The Plandemic Resistance thread

[Luke Holiday]

Posted by wegge (here)
To Bill: what would be a „pure“ virus death? Isn’t always something in the body giving in (like the kidney failure caused by the Virus that then leads to other failures? (Hope you understand what I mean.)

Should we really believe a decision on that level, „reducing“ the potential impact of the thing that’s caused a huge debate and uproar by 94% is not seen by anyone of the CDC? How many layers and gatekeepers does this have to pass on its way onto their homepage?

(I have a hard time believing that story of the media-blind scientist - sounds like a lonely gunman theory)

Did someone resolve the germ vs terrain theory by the way? It is a fundamental underlying premise (germ theory being the winner) that we seem to accept here. Anyone has any enlightening material on that?

I hear you loud and clear:

There is an excellent thread covering this exact same title started by anadacate:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...mp-Germ-Theory

It may be apropos to revisit the Pasteur deathbed quote on the subject:


Quoted louis pasteur on his death bed... It’s not the bacteria or the viruses themselves that produce the disease, it’s the chemical by-products and constituents of these microorganisms enacting upon the unbalanced, malfunctioning cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce disease. "If the body’s cellular metabolism and pH is perfectly balanced or poised, it is susceptible to no illness or disease."

http://www.neurotalk.org/parkinson-s...:~:text=quoted

Also, I would add that any good Naturopathic Physician treats her patients from a core belief that, the overwhelmingly majority of all dis-ease is cured and prevented by bringing the mind, body and spiritual terrain into balance and optimal function





Blessings Luke

[DaveToo]

Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
#RebelNews #AndrewSays #CDCReport
6 per cent: COVID-19 deaths shockingly low without pre-existing conditions, according to CDC

Blessings Luke

I've been ultra busy working on another project so I had to abandon my daily Covid research.
A few months ago I used to visited the CDC website, the exact page where they posted their latest "6% stats".
I started compiling a death stat Excel file.

For me the jig was up back then already.
I was using the CDC's numbers so I was getting them from the "horse's mouth".

How 'strange' it was when I discovered that the all cause mortality in the U.S. was up just 5% from the last five year average!!
And this was with them monkeying around with their figures!

This 6% news is H U G E !!!!!

It needs to shouted from the top of the mountains everywhere.
It needs to be in the front page headlines of every news site around the world !!!!

It's B I G !!!

Tell all your friends and relatives that they can now breathe a big sigh of relief!
Tell them Covid-19 is not dangerous at all !!!

Give them the CDC's numbers and explain that less than 10,000 Americans have died, (not 180,000) from Covid-19 alone.

Tell them that if they are healthy with no other serious illness(es) that lands them in hospital, they are almost more likely to die from a lightning strike than from Covid-19 !!!

[Luke Holiday]

Thank you Dave - We both pointed this out in the lockdown vs non-Lockdown thread. I

I just want to show what 5% looks like in chart form:

Note from 2018 to 2020 there was a 2% increase in the death rate; Also note the unchanging growth rate over the last 5 years...

The proof is in these numbers folks!!! Here is your clarity, your honesty, your understanding and most importantly here is the truth...THERE IS NO PANDEMIC... THERE NEVER WAS.... You can pick a country and the data will be the same... Go ahead I dare you...

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...kdown+lockdown

Data Source: United Nations - World Population Prospects

https://www.macrotrends.net/countrie...tes/death-rate

Year Death Rate Growth Rate
2020 8.880 1.120%
2019 8.782 1.120%
2018 8.685 1.220%
2017 8.580 1.240%
2016 8.475 1.270%
2015 8.369 1.270%
l
Blessings Luke



“We have seen mass protests about military invasions and about injustices of many kinds, but we are now entering a new era of understanding and for the first time we are going to see people protesting in large numbers about the conspiracy itself and not just its individual expressions, like globalisation and wars. It is a time when the irresistible force (the human awakening) is going eye-to-eye with what it thinks is the immovable object (the agenda for global control). Immovable it is not, as we shall see in due course, but it is not going to go quietly. We need to be strong and refuse to acquiesce to these control freaks under any circumstances, no matter what the scale of intimidation and provocation. The Illuminati families may have the money, governments, banks, corporations, police and military, but the humanity that they so mercilessly target has the sheer numbers.”

― David Icke, Human Race Get Off Your Knees: The Lion Sleeps No More

[greybeard]

At the root of this is a fear of death.
So many people seem scared witless to the point they have accepted Draconian measures.
Death is inevitable --why fear it.
True there are difficult passings and easy ones.
The late Dr David Hawkins claimed that the time and date of our death is fixed at birth -- now if that is true --why worry.
You dont die of anything, the body gives up for whatever "reason" we attribute to it and home we go.
The passing probably easier if we lived wisely, took care of body and mind physically and spiritually.
Chris

[greybeard]

Piers Corbyn claims coronavirus lockdown is 'psychological operation to close down the economy'
Imogen Braddick
Evening Standard1 September 2020, 8:06 am BST

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/piers-corb...070605723.html

The brother of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has claimed the coronavirus lockdown is a "psychological operation to close down the economy".

Piers Corbyn was arrested and slapped with a £10,000 fine for his part in anti-lockdown protests on Saturday which saw thousands descend on Trafalgar Square.

The 73-year-old, a climate change denier who set up controversial weather forecasting business Weather Action, said on Twitter he had been handed the fixed penalty fine as "organiser".

Asked about his suggestions that Boris Johnson "invented" a virus which might not exist, Mr Corbyn told Good Morning Britain: "I don't know if anyone invented it or not, but I would say that the numbers of people getting whatever they are getting is declining rapidly and there is no justification whatsoever so a continuing lockdown."

He added: "800,000 people have died and have been labelled Covid when it might have been completely something else. It is not a pandemic because the numbers dying are nothing different from a normal year of people dying.

"Secondly, it is not a high-consequence infectious disease, and that was declared by the Government and the World Health Organisation on March 19.

"So what we have is a psychological operation to close down the economy in the interest of mega corporations who are going to gain from massive job losses happening now."

More follows...

[Luke Holiday]

Watch Here: Sterilized masks made with extraordinary attention to detail and protection

https://www.facebook.com/nomiabraham...3NDkzNjIwOTQy/

https://davidicke.com/2020/09/02/tec...ale-of-deceit/

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

https://davidicke.com/2020/09/02/dav...has-the-power/


...latest Call to action from David Icke

Blessings Luke

¤=[Post Update]=¤

‘Masks Make Us Slaves’: Massive Protests in Germany Over Lockdown

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o0GN9WjMP0w

Blessings Luke

[Delight]

Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
https://davidicke.com/2020/09/02/dav...has-the-power/


...latest Call to action from David Icke

Blessings Luke

¤=[Post Update]=¤

‘Masks Make Us Slaves’: Massive Protests in Germany Over Lockdown

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o0GN9WjMP0w

Blessings Luke

Just have to bump in happy hope many will look at the video.....

[onawah]

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Wants Investigation on Potential Life-Threatening Anaphylaxis if Injected with Moderna’s COVID Vaccine
September 2, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...covid-vaccine/
By the Children’s Health Defense Team

(Many hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"On August 26, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) wrote a letter to Dr. Jerry Menikoff, Director of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP), asking for an investigation into serious safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccine being developed by Moderna. Moderna’s version of the vaccine, championed by Dr. Anthony Fauci and funded with $500 million in taxpayer dollars through Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), a molecule to which approximately 72% of the American population have antibodies and 8% have highly elevated levels of antibodies. People who have pre-existing PEG antibodies could experience life-threatening anaphylaxis if injected with PEG-containing substances such as the Moderna COVID vaccine. Additionally, antibodies to PEG can both decrease the effectiveness of the vaccine and increase the risk of side effects.

CHD’s letter to OHRP

Below is RFK, Jr.’s letter to Dr. Fauci:

August 26th, 2020

Anthony Fauci, MD, Director

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease

RE: Phase III Moderna mRNA-1273 Vaccine

Dear Dr. Fauci,

We urge you to require Moderna to inform clinical trial participants of the unique risks associated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), an ingredient in the NIAID funded Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. As you know, approximately 72% of Americans may have antibodies to PEG with 8% of those individuals having highly elevated levels of antibodies, >500ng/ml.

Injecting a PEG-containing vaccine into individuals with pre-existing PEG antibodies could lead to life-threatening anaphylaxis. The presence of anti-PEG antibodies in approximately 7 out of 10 Americans led to the authors conclusion that “…sensitive detection and precise quantitation of anti-PEG Ab levels in a clinical setting will be essential to ensuring the safe use of PEGylated drugs in all target patient populations going forward.”

In its prospectus, Moderna acknowledges the potential for its proprietary lipid nanoparticles and PEG to produce “systemic side effects”. The company has nevertheless refused to prescreen individuals participating in the clinical trials for preexisting PEG antibodies, despite FDA’s strong recommendations that it do so.

For those participating in the Moderna clinical trials, the uptick in parenteral exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—potentially disastrous and life-threatening. Moderna reported results from the Phase 1 open-label trial in 45 healthy adults acknowledged that over half (23 out of 45) of the participants experienced a vaccine adverse event, including one volunteer who withdrew from the trial due to urticaria (hives), a condition often associated with drug allergies and life-threatening anaphylaxis. We worry that Moderna’s failure to inform the trial participants of the PEG allergy risks not only endangers their lives, but also may have caused clinicians and volunteers to dismiss telltale allergic reactions as “unrelated” to the vaccine.

Children’s Health Defense has grave safety and efficacy concerns about the use of PEG in vaccines due to the high percentage of the population having preexisting antibodies to PEG. While it’s unlikely that everyone with pre-existing PEG antibodies will have a severe reaction to a vaccine containing PEG, it is criminally reckless to assume that none will. It is our hope that you will make the appropriate public assurances that NIAID will promptly inform the volunteers of this risk.

Moderna answers critics of its dangerous failure to warn trial subjects by dismissing the well-documented fact that a high percentage of people have anti-PEG antibodies as merely “hypothetical”. Moderna’s justification is disingenuous, at best. There is no serious dispute about PEG’s ubiquity across the population. Moderna’s refusal to screen for PEG is dangerous to the trial participants and violates 45 CFR 46.116(b)(2). That regulation requires manufacturers to disclose any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to clinical trial subjects. Another provision, 45 CFR 46-111(a) (1) mandates that manufacturers minimize risks to clinical trial participants by using procedures that are consistent with sound research design and that do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk.

The world is aware of NIAID’s deep institutional commitment to the Moderna Vaccine. Moderna’s novel MRNA vaccine is a career vanity project for certain powerful NIAID officials who have nurtured the platform for years. NIAID apparently owns half of Moderna’s patent. At least six NIAID officials also share patent ownership and apparently stand to collect personal royalties of up to $150,000 annually on vaccine sales. NIAID has committed billions of dollars of public monies to the project and placed the Moderna vaccine at the front of the line. As you know, critics have suggested that NIAID’s conflicts have engendered a posture, among NIAID regulators, of ignoring emerging safety signals because the Moderna Vaccine is “too big to fail”. But, NIAID’s peculiar interest in Moderna is no excuse for short cuts. To the contrary, it is critical that NIAID’s regulatory scrutiny of Moderna be beyond reproach, since other manufacturers will look to Moderna as a role model for their own safety studies. NIAID’s pet vaccine should be a template for rigorous protocols that unambiguously elevate safety above monetary considerations. We urge that you give priority to your agency’s duty to protect public health and the rights of trial participants to genuine informed consent. We ask you to order Moderna to immediately inform all trial participants of the risk for allergic reactions from PEG, and to carefully monitor and publicly disclose allergic reactions potentially associated with PEG.

Sincerely,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
cc: President Donald Trump
Jared Kushner

CHD Note: At the time of publication, we have not received a response from either the OHRP or Dr. Fauci. We will update our readers with any developments as they occur."

[onawah]

Millions March in Berlin / London PLUS Only 6% of C0VlD Deaths actually from C0VlD?
16,545 views•Sep 1, 2020
Ben Swann
151K subscribers

"We take a look at the millions of protestors marching in Berlin and London over the weekend and we break down the numbers from CDC that appear to show that only 6% of C0VlD deaths are actually not from C0VlD, turns out that is not quite true. I'll explain."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4w61LNX4EJM

[norman]

A 'Higherside Chat' about concious resistance, with Derrick Broze. He's founder of The Concious Resistance Network, and wrote a book called "How to Opt Out of the Technocratic State".

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jIPKfgZyw3k

start at 2 minutes 38 seconds to skip the housekeeping talk

[Luke Holiday]

THE COVID HOAX IS MSM OFFICIAL FOLKS!!!

NY TIMES ON COVID-19 TEST: “UP TO 90% OF PEOPLE TESTING POSITIVE CARRIED BARELY ANY VIRUS,” MANY ARE “NOT LIKELY TO BE CONTAGIOUS”

Widely-used Covid-19 test is “diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus,” says NYT

The New York Times says “up to 90% of people testing positive” with a standard Covid-19 test “carried barely any virus” because the test is too sensitive, and is thus “diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus” and “are not likely to be contagious.”

In an Aug. 29 article, the Times said that the most widely used Covid-19 test, the PCR test, doesn’t provide feedback on how contagious an infected patient may be because it’s a simple “yes or no test,” and the test is so sensitive that it’s testing positive for “genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left,” according to one doctor.

“Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus,” the article begins. “Most of these people are not likely to be contagious, and identifying them may contribute to bottlenecks that prevent those who are contagious from being found in time.”



The article is only getting attention now because the Times gave it a rather weak headline despite the article turning the entire Covid-19 narrative upside-down, especially as politicians use positive case numbers to justify “mail-in ballots” in the upcoming election as well as the massive lockdowns that have destroyed jobs and disrupted families.

It’s almost as if the Times was forced to report on something it didn’t want to because the story is too big to contain, which is plausible given that an increasing number of people know someone who has tested positive for Covid-19 but never appeared outright sick from it.


“The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious,” the Times continued. “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.”

Interestingly, the Times also stated that similar tests for other viruses do provide a sense of how contagious a patient may be.

It’s rather convenient for politicians that the Covid-19 tests, on the other hand, provide only a simple “yes or no” result.

“We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all,” said Dr. Mina, as quoted by the Times. “We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making.”

https://www.infowars.com/ny-times-on...be-contagious/

AJ has video to accompany article




Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

CDC WANTS STATES READY FOR COVID-19 VACCINES BY NOVEMBER
Vaccine could be rushed into distribution days before election


I would like to have some discussion on why the Cabal bastards (CB's) are rushing the vaccine into mass implementation when everyone knows that proper testing of vaccines takes years before they can be considered safe....

Quick thoughts as to why...
.
1. Are the CB's afraid of a DJT re-election... DJT has hinted that Vaccinations will not be mandatory

2. CB's know that Creepy, Perverted, Sleepy, Demented JB has no chance at being elected legitimately and this may there only shot (pun intended) at getting that shi*e into our system's

3. CB's know they cannot stick their poison in the majority of the population at this time, because the resistance is too great.

Do you think it is a coincidence that the CB's put out this story the day after the CDC announced there is 94% lower death rate rate for persons without co-morbities then had been previously reported?

What are your thoughts...?


https://www.infowars.com/cdc-wants-s...s-by-november/



Blessings Luke

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Vaccine-derived polio spreads in Africa after defeat of wild virus

https://www.theguardian.com/global-d...-of-wild-virus

A new polio outbreak in Sudan has been linked to the oral polio vaccine that uses a weakened form of the virus.

News of the outbreak comes a week after the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that wild polio had been eradicated in Africa.

The WHO linked the cases to a strain of the virus that had been noted circulating in Chad last year and warned that the risk of spread to other parts of the Horn of Africa was high.

In a statement on the new cases, the WHO said two children in Sudan, one from South Darfur state and the other from Gadarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea, were paralysed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio.

Advertisement
The WHO said initial outbreak investigations showed the cases were linked to a continuing vaccine-derived outbreak in Chad that was first detected last year and is now spreading in Chad and Cameroon.

While so-called vaccine-derived polio is a known risk, the emergence of these cases so soon after the announced eradication of wild polio in Africa is a setback.

At issue is the fact that the oral polio vaccine – preferred in some places because of its ease of delivery and the lack of need for sterile syringes – uses an attenuated or weakened version of polio.

When a child receives the oral vaccine, the weakened virus replicates in the intestine, encouraging the production of antibodies, and can be present in excreta. In an area where there are high enough levels of immunity in the population, this usually does not present a problem, even if sanitation is poor.

But in areas where there is both poor sanitation and a lack of general immunisation the virus can survive and circulate for months, mutating over time until it poses the same risk of paralysis-causing disease as wild polio.

Use of the oral polio vaccine was discontinued in the UK in 2004 and the US in 2000, and the UN agency advises that the use of the oral vaccine should be discontinued after polio is judged to be eradicated because of the risk of vaccine-derived outbreaks.

Genetic sequencing of the virus involved in the Sudan cases confirmed that they were linked to the outbreak in Chad.

The WHO warned on Monday that the risk of further spread of vaccine-derived polio across central Africa and the Horn of Africa was high, noting the large-scale population movements in the region.

Amid the coronavirus pandemic, many major vaccination campaigns needed to stamp out polio have been disrupted across Africa and elsewhere, leaving millions of children vulnerable to infection.

A rise in deaths from preventable diseases must not be part of Covid-19's legacy
Read more
In April, the WHO and its partners reluctantly recommended a temporary halt to mass polio immunisation campaigns, recognising the move could lead to a resurgence of the disease.

In May, they reported that 46 campaigns to vaccinate children against polio had been suspended in 38 countries, mostly in Africa, because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Some of the campaigns have recently been restarted, but health workers need to vaccinate more than 90% of children in their efforts to eradicate the paralytic disease.

Health officials had initially aimed to wipe out polio by 2000, a deadline repeatedly pushed back and missed.

Wild polio remains endemic in Afghanistan and Pakistan; both countries are also struggling to contain outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio.

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

Smiles on faces – not masks – the antidote to the psychopaths

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=FBktvsUr-Aw

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

It was always coming – excess deaths at home caused by lockdown now higher than even the manufactured ‘Covid’ figures and this was blatantly predictable from the start so making it premeditated


https://www.expressandstar.com/news/...us-deaths-ons/




Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

France's Kristina Mladenovic suffers meltdown in US Open loss, rips COVID-19 protocols

https://sports.yahoo.com/frances-kri...105331104.html

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

The message of Jon's Post is so important that I wanted to also post it here..

The whole scam just fell apart: COVID test, overwhelming number of false positives
by Jon Rappoport
September 1, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...lse-positives/

"Townhall.com, August 29: “According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.”

“’Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…’ warns The Times.”

Yes, that’s what the NY Times is confessing (8/29): “Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”

“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

Let me break this down for you, because it’s a lot worse than the Times admits. The rabbit hole goes much deeper—and I’ve been reporting on the deeper facts for months.

The issue appears to be the ballooning sensitivity of the PCR test. It’s so sensitive that it picks up inconsequential tiny, tiny amounts of virus that couldn’t harm a flea—and it calls these amounts “positive.”

Therefore, millions of people are labeled “positive/infected” who carry so little virus that no harm would come to them or anyone they come in contact with.

That would be bad enough. But the truth is, the PCR test is not able to produce ANY reliable number that reflects how much virus a person is carrying. A lot, a little, it doesn’t matter.

The test has never been validated, in a large-scale study, for the ability to quantify the amount of virus a person is carrying. I’ve proposed how that study should be done IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT IN THE LAB.

You take 1000 people and remove tissue samples from them. A lab puts these samples through its PCR and announces which virus it found in each case and how much virus it found in each case.

It says: “All right, in patients 23, 46, 76, 89, 265 we found a high amount of virus.”

That should mean these particular patients are visibly sick. They will have obvious clinical symptoms. Why? Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body.

So now we unblind these particular patients with high amounts of virus, according to the PCR. Are they, in fact, sick? Or are they running marathons and swimming five miles a day? Let’s see. For real.

THIS VALIDATION OF THE PCR HAS NEVER BEEN DONE.

Therefore, the claim that the PCR can determine how much virus is in a human is completely and utterly unproven. Period.

Therefore, ALL the PCR tests being done on people all over the world reflect NOTHING about illness, infection, contagion, or transmission.

The scam is wall to wall.

But there’s more.

The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven.

And finally, as I’ve been writing and demonstrating for months, there is no evidence that researchers used proper procedure to discover “a new coronavirus that is causing a pandemic.”

Therefore, the PCR test, as worthless as it already is, aims to show the presence of a germ that has never been shown to exist.

But let’s lock down the planet, destroy economies and untold numbers of lives in the process."

SOURCES:

http://www.townhall.com/tipsheet/bro...ative-n2575305

http://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/he...s-testing.html

Jon's website/blog: https://nomorefakenews.com/

Onawah's thread: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ight=rappoport

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

... Laws for thee ... but not for me!



The hypocracy...the arrogance is incredible and will be their downfall...

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

Extremely important well researched/referenced article to understand the effects of 5 G... and educate others...

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1375925 - Posted by Exomatrix

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...-irreversible- started by Exomatrix



Summary of the research proven 5G health effects:

In summary, we have a series of 5G linked events that have occurred in more than one situation, where we have plausible mechanisms by which 5G radiation can cause them and where we know that counter arguments are based on “safety guidelines” which fail to predict biological effects and are, therefore, fraudulent.

These include: (KEY: VGCC = Voltage Gated Calcium Channels)

1. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects reported both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to but more severe than effects caused by other EMF exposures.

2. Three suicides within 11 days of each other in the first 5G ambulance personnel

3. Cardiac effects also reported in both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to those found in in humans in following other EMF exposures as well as in animal experimental studies.
https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...ve-myocarditis (added by the postee LH)

4. Two cases of massive, almost instantaneous 5G bird sudden cardiac death effects, one in the Netherlands and one in the UK.

5. We have cases of mass panic in cattle, as well as unusual aggressive behavior in cattle and sheep.

6. We have multiple cases of human limb birth defects in France and Germany.

7. We have multiple cases of apparent 5G fires in Korea and in Southern California.

8. We have large apparent increases in EHS in Stuttgart Germany. While this is a single example, to my knowledge, similar although more slowly developing examples of EHS have been shown to occur in occupational EMF exposure studies and in the two smart meter studies. The case may be weaker here, because it is based solely on the Stuttgart example, but is still substantial.

9. Four downstream effects produced by EMFs acting via VGCC activation, oxidative stress, NFkappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis greatly stimulate both coronavirus infectious process, including aspects involved in viral spreading and also pneumonia, the predominant cause of death in the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic. It follows from this that the “coincidence” that Wuhan, China’s first smart 5G city and location of China’s first 5G highway and the other “coincidence” that the epidemic was first discovered when high 5G antenna densification started, with the severity of the epidemic and death rate increasing very rapidly as circe 8,000 5G antennae were built all over the city of Wuhan. It is, therefore, highly probable that these are not coincidences but rather involve causal roles of 5G EMFs.

In each of these cases, as stated above, we have plausible mechanisms by which each of them can be produced by 5G EMF exposure and where all contrary claims based on “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent. In the eight of these of these effects (#8 being an apparent exception), we have a prima facie case for 5G causation. And let me repeat that any effects seen with the initial “rollout” of 5G radiation will be a tiny fraction of those predicted by a mature 5G system interacting with the “internet of things” because any initial 5G system has very little to communicate with on initial rollout and therefore will produce only a tiny fraction of highly pulsed EMF effects of such a mature system. The very high impacts of modulating and nonmodulating pulses mean that the extraordinarily high level of modulating pulses in 5G radiation, with those pulses communicating vast amounts of information per second, means that 5G radiation is vastly more dangerous than the exposures we previously have had and those previous exposures have already having massive impacts on us and on other organisms.

The eight apparent 5G effects listed above do not include other predicted massive effects of 5G radiation where we have no evidence of whether they are occurring or not but where we have evidence of important causal roles of other EMF exposures.

These include:

1. Massive impacts on male reproduction, where 5G radiation may well produce very rapid crashes in male reproduction to close to zero.

2. Universal of near universal very early onset Alzheimer’s dementias (AD). Here we know that all you have to do to produce universal or near universal very early onset AD in a rat model, is to give a series of EMF pulses during one day and even during one second. If you give pulses every day, you get universal or near universal AD in six month old rats (roughly the equivalent age of a 12 year old child).

3. Universal or near universal autism. We know, from genetic studies, that human autism is caused by excessive VGCC activity and because this is the primary mechanism of action of EMFs, including MM-wave EMFs of 5G, it is highly plausible that the very highly pulsed 5G may cause universal or near universal autism. 4. Very high levels of germ line mutations caused by the impact of 5G radiation acting via VGCC activation on the DNA of human sperm and on the DNA of human oocytes. What this argues is that what little human reproduction survives the effects of #1 may well be heavily impacted by very high levels of de novo mutation.

Possible causation of each of these by 5G radiation could have been tested by animal model studies, before any 5G rollout. It is my opinion that it is an atrocity of almost unbelievable proportions that no such tests have been done. All of this argues that 5G presents threats of the sort that we have never seen before – multiple imminent existential threats to our survival.

Source

Blessings Luke

Onawah the answer to your question: Can 5 G produce a Bradykinin storm is Yes!

1. Exomatrix article post:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1375925

2. https://electricalvitality.com/vgcc/

3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657726/
Kinins— The Kallikrein-Kinin System and Oxidative Stress

4. Bradykinin Protects Against Oxidative Stress–Induced Endothelial Cell Senescence
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1...AHA.108.123729

The Supercomputer article is outlining a CV 19/Bradykinin storm hypothesis. Onawah you asked if 5 G could produce the same sx's. The answer is yes! ... just have to connect a few dots...

A. Reference 1: John's article reveals 5 G's primary negative affect on human health is the disruption of Voltage-Gated Calcium channels (VGCC).

B. Reference 2: Reveals disruption of VGCC causes increased Oxidative stress in the body.

C. Reference 3/4: Pub med journal articles revealing Oxidative stress causes an increase in Bradykinin/Kinin (BK) release. The more the Oxidative stress the greater the BK release.

In Summary: 5G EMF = Disruption of VGCC's, = Increased Oxidative stress in the body = Increased Bradykinin release

Blessings Luke

[Luke Holiday]

Link no longer valid please delete