-
23rd April 2011 18:51
Link to Post #241
Avalon Member
Re: Integrity
Quotes in black from Chicodoodoo post 230. In purple are my comments - Flash
Bravo, Flash! This cuts to the heart of the matter. There may be a BIG problem here on Avalon where integrity and tolerance clash. That is the point, integrity and tolerance should not have to clash. An integral person knows itself and knows where he is not congruent, this is integrity. Not being only one piece, but knowing where we lack, admitting it, forgiving it. Liking diversity and hating individuality would not be integrity, it would be being messed up
This post of Bill's on "Integrity" really needs to be seen in context, and that context cannot be seen without hearing the voices of those Avalon members that have been recently banned. With that context, the reasons behind Bill’s post become more visible.
Speculation: Bill is using the ideas of "ownership", "integrity", and "separation" to justify his actions of intolerance and non-acceptance that are resulting in the increasingly common unsubscribing of Avalon members. If you don't mind my intrusion, be carefull here Chicodoodoo, have you checked with Bill about those speculations - I am glad you used that last term, it puts it into context
1. Bill "owns" the Avalon forum. He models this public forum as a private club. Bill emphatically reserves the right to dismiss anyone for any reason at any time. The separation is sudden, complete, and final. There is no oversight or review of this power. As we all know, there is the very real risk of corruption when power like this is reserved to a single person. Again, be careful and check. It may seem like this without being like that. But it points definitely to a communication interface missing or problematic: may be rules for the forum are not specific and clear enough. What are the values to be carried by this forum, how are they defined, what are the no no behaviors in specifics. Where and when is the line crossed for no return? We are from widely varied backgrounds, cultures and languages, behaviors have different meanings as well as words depending on where you are on the planet or in your head. If we were in he heart and beyond, most of these problems would be absent though - it is called evolution
2. The rationalization that Bill makes for removing Avalon members is that he is acting with integrity by following the ground rules he himself has laid out. The human legal system has sunk into this same trap, where the law is manipulated to legalize unjust actions. At the same time, the condemned Avalon members stand accused of lacking integrity, but they are given no recourse to any defense whatsoever. I am not sure this is a rationalization. Could it be lack of clarity in communicating values? Could it be changing values? One thing I know is that I personnaly, in my private life, dropped all those that were constantly pulling me down with destructive comments and action, or with manipulative behaviors, after numerous times of trying to communicate my needs and desire for better. I also personnally realised that I still have quite a lot of negative thinking in me, therefore attracting the negative, which I am cleaning up as well. May be Bill is just doing that, plain and simple.t
3. A further rationalization is that the process of separation is occurring all over the world, so it must be OK to participate in it. We all know that separation is part of the "divide and conquer" strategy used by the controllers to subdue humanity. Avalon, like humanity, should be uniting, not separating.Yes, in fact we are all one. Those that have negative behaviors and comments are a reflection of us - we are in these fields with them, together, we are one. It does not mean that we have to remain underneath, a victim though. Getting out of the pattern may be the lesson to learn and to give, together. When talking about "beyond", we are taliking of the whole field of energy in the universe. It is my belief that to overcome PTB we have to go into these fields. And bring them back here. PTB is still too powerful otherwise.This means tolerance, respect of everyone in their state (including PTB) but not sinking into victimhood. It is mostly acceptance of oneself, with one's rotten side as well, and forgiveness to oneself first. (This is what I was seeing you trying to do Chicodoodoo, with your thread on a new world declaration, going beyond and changing the field here).
I would encourage other Avalon members to act in the original spirit of Project Camelot and look into all sides of this issue, not just Bill’s side. The integrity of Avalon is at stake. As Flash points out, if we can’t solve this problem here, what chance does humanity have?[/QUOTE] I do agree with myself at this point. I just want to add that tolerance, love and integrity are one, they do not have to clash.
Last edited by Flash; 23rd April 2011 at 18:57.
-
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:
Chicodoodoo (23rd April 2011), giovonni (23rd April 2011), Mike (23rd April 2011), mosquito (24th April 2011), sandy (23rd April 2011), skippy (23rd April 2011)
-
23rd April 2011 19:19
Link to Post #242
Avalon Member
Re: Integrity
I'm wondering if a house full of guests is really a good model for the future.
My gut tells me the right model is a family home.
-
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:
Arc (24th April 2011), Chicodoodoo (23rd April 2011), Gardener (24th April 2011), jorr lundstrom (23rd April 2011), Lettherebelight (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (24th April 2011), magicmanx (24th April 2011), sandy (23rd April 2011), skippy (23rd April 2011)
-
23rd April 2011 19:21
Link to Post #243