+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst 1 3 13 23 28 LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 558

Thread: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

  1. Link to Post #241
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,052
    Thanks
    9,999
    Thanked 56,255 times in 8,324 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    As Paul Watson put it, when Alex asked him what he thought the imminent false flag event might be, "Alex, the imminent false flag event is the mid term elections".


    T Smith, you've got it bang on.


    There is only one thing to say, after that. Considering how much work the patriots in the system and military have obviously put into getting this far, don't count on them walking away and giving up if the crooks get their way in the upcoming elections.


    I'm not even sure which was plan A and which was plan B.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), T Smith (15th August 2018), Tintin (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  3. Link to Post #242
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,621
    Thanks
    30,533
    Thanked 138,643 times in 21,530 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Dimitri Orlov has an excellent essay on this topic: Censoring Alex Jones.

    After a number of well stated comparisons between his own views and Alex Jones' views, Orlov observes that the censoring of Alex Jones by "Google, Facebook, Apple, Google Podcast, Spotify, iHeartRadio, MailChimp, Disqus, LinkedIn, Flickr, Pinterest and several others" (Orlov's list) was clearly coordinated effort instigated by some element of or near the US government.

    This makes these organizations, "Google, Facebook, Apple, Google Podcast, Spotify, iHeartRadio, MailChimp, Disqus, LinkedIn, Flickr, Pinterest and several others", agents of the US government.

    This means that these organizations are in violation of international law. Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defends the right to freedom of opinion and expression: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

    This also means that these organizations are in violation of laws in various nations that require foreign agents to register.

    Orlov suggests that "Jones should sue the US and the companies that censored him in the European Court of Human rights in Strasbourg, France and seek redress both against entities within the US government which issued the illegal order (to be ferreted out in the course of discovery) and against the transnational companies that carried it out."

    Orlov further expects that the activity of these censoring companies, once it becomes clear they agents of the US, will become significantly curtailed in various other nations whose laws have been violated.

    If you enjoy reading Dimitri Orlov as I do ... give it a read.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Bayareamom (15th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), happyuk (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), Nasu (15th August 2018), norman (15th August 2018), PurpleLama (15th August 2018), T Smith (15th August 2018), Tintin (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  5. Link to Post #243
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd June 2013
    Location
    North America
    Age
    72
    Posts
    6,884
    Thanks
    12,723
    Thanked 29,293 times in 6,140 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Twitter says ALEX , you are banned for a week.. Have a nice day

    https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/14/med...nes/index.html

    Conspiracy, culpability most certainly..
    The spokesperson said the content which prompted Twitter to suspend Jones was a video published Tuesday in which he said, "Now is time to act on the enemy before they do a false flag."

    On Friday, one day after a CNN investigation found that Jones' Twitter accounts appeared to have repeatedly violated the company's rules, Twitter said the accounts belonging to Jones and his fringe media organization InfoWars would remain online.

    At the time, a Twitter spokesperson said the company concluded that of the more than a dozen tweets included in CNN's Thursday report, seven were found to have violated Twitter's rules. Twitter would have required those tweets to be deleted, if they were to have remained up.

    But after CNN's investigation was published, the tweets cited in it were almost immediately deleted from the social media website. Jones said on his program that he had instructed his staff to do so and "take the super high road," though he contested whether the tweets violated any Twitter rules.

    Related: Twitter admits InfoWars violated its rules, but says it will remain on the platform

    Twitter is one of the only major social media companies that has not scrubbed its platform of Jones or InfoWars. Recently, Jones has seen the vast majority of the social media infrastructure for his media empire crumble. Apple has removed the full library of his podcasts, Facebook has unpublished his pages, YouTube terminated his account, and other technology companies took similar action.

    However, InfoWars apps remain available through the Google Play store and Apple's app store.
    Mass-Social-media needs a reset.. no words..

  6. Link to Post #244
    Avalon Member Dom1noe's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Age
    36
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 29 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    The website itself is down right now.

    http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/infowars.com.html

    Edit: After trying some more, the page loaded, but I can't repeat the loading. This suggests a DoS attack. How are your attempts?
    Last edited by Dom1noe; 15th August 2018 at 05:17.

  7. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dom1noe For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), Nasu (15th August 2018), Tintin (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  8. Link to Post #245
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,621
    Thanks
    30,533
    Thanked 138,643 times in 21,530 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Dom1noe (here)
    The website itself is down right now.

    http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/infowars.com.html

    Edit: After trying some more, the page loaded, but I can't repeat the loading. This suggests a DoS attack. How are your attempts?
    I've been able to reload InfoWars.com each time I tried just now, but it's a bit slow (perhaps a few seconds slower than I'd expect.)

    However http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/infowars.com.html continues to show that InfoWars.com is down. I don't know why the discrepancy.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), Nasu (15th August 2018), Tintin (15th August 2018)

  10. Link to Post #246
    Avalon Member T Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Posts
    1,785
    Thanks
    15,305
    Thanked 11,418 times in 1,676 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Dimitri Orlov has an excellent essay on this topic: Censoring Alex Jones.

    After a number of well stated comparisons between his own views and Alex Jones' views, Orlov observes that the censoring of Alex Jones by "Google, Facebook, Apple, Google Podcast, Spotify, iHeartRadio, MailChimp, Disqus, LinkedIn, Flickr, Pinterest and several others" (Orlov's list) was clearly coordinated effort instigated by some element of or near the US government.
    Excellent essay/ analysis... very enjoyable read. Although I think you are refining Orlov's analysis by characterizing his notion of collusion as "some element of or near the US Government..." As far as I could glean from Orlov he is coming at this from more of an old-school-Soviet perspective where he envisages the government as the centralized power giving the marching orders (in his words, Big Tech then "salutes"); I believe it is true that in the old USSR the big tech companies would have been the lapdogs for the government/KGB; but I would posit whatever the power structure undergirding this conspiracy isn't the US Government, per se. Call it Deep State. Call it some power "of or near" as you have, but not the US Government itself, which is a lap dog to them. Big Tech itself either is, or is closer to this power than the US Government itself.
    Last edited by T Smith; 15th August 2018 at 11:18.

  11. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to T Smith For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), norman (15th August 2018), ThePythonicCow (15th August 2018), Tintin (15th August 2018)

  12. Link to Post #247
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd January 2011
    Location
    Ignoring Your Outrage
    Language
    Discordian
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks
    29,096
    Thanked 40,082 times in 4,764 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    As a result of our reaction, the solution to be presented will be to have the gov't get in to the internet business, ostensibly to ensure fairness but in reality to control the discourse leaving us with less recourse than we have now.

    What recourse do we have? Put every bit we can to drive traffic to every smaller independent social media site that we can.

  13. Link to Post #248
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,052
    Thanks
    9,999
    Thanked 56,255 times in 8,324 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    I dissagree there PL. That's continuing the same merry go round. What's small and independent one year is a monolithic menace to humanity a few years later.


    A level playing field is not something to be ideologically paranoid about.


    What absolutely confounds me to the point of banging my head on the wall is, why are Americans SO proud of their bill of rights at exactly the same time as they are stuck with superglue to the principle of corporate autonomy ?
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (16th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), PurpleLama (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  15. Link to Post #249
    Canada Avalon Member Fellow Aspirant's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Location
    Kingston, Ontario
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,104
    Thanks
    6,038
    Thanked 5,595 times in 1,002 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Re:
    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
    If I ever post hate speech in this forum, then I would expect to be banned.
    But Brian, what's hate speech?

    Please define it precisely. Your post that I quoted implies that you think you know exactly what it is.

    (Maybe others can try to do the same. But do note that it has NO formal legal definition.)

    This is central and important to this entire thread.




    Why yes, Bill, as a matter of fact, when I use language, I usually DO think I know what I mean, a condition not too alien to most of us around the here. This would, by extension, include the concept of “hate speech”. And while legal assignations of its meaning are always in flux, the concept itself is deeply enshrined in a plenitude of legal declarations. Entire countries have signed on to definitions of it. As always, though, its validity and consequences are to be decided on a case by case basis.

    But here we are faced with a historical conundrum, aren’t we? The subjective nature of language requires a constant vigilance coincident with its use – else we risk the danger of confusing our audience. Clarity is key to understanding, and careful choice in one’s diction is always of utmost concern. And nowhere, not incidentally, is diction more germane than when deciphering the intent of those who wield hate speech.
    Lewis Carrol had some serious fun with the subjective nature of language when he penned the encounter between Alice and Humpty Dumpty as …

    Name:  Humpty D.gif
Views: 308
Size:  9.1 KB

    "I don't know what you mean by 'glory'," Alice said.
    Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't- till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
    "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
    "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less."
    "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
    "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-that's all."

    Through the Looking Glass, Ch. VI

    Word meaning, as Carrol so beautifully points out, can be rather malleable, depending on the intent of the one using it, and it behooves all of us to try to nail down the essences and boundaries of our thinking, especially when we embark on dialogues and arguments with others.

    Herewith, then, is my rather feeble attempt at “nailing down” the amoeba that is hate speech.

    To begin, I promise that I will eschew the temptation to resort to using the famous claim uttered by Justice Potter Stewart, to wit:

    The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio.[1][2][3] In explaining why the material at issue in the case was not obscene under the Roth test, and therefore was protected speech that could not be censored, Stewart wrote:

    I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.[4]

    Tempting as it is, and as common-sensical as it is, such an approach as ‘knowing it when you see it’ will do little to sate the appetites of those of us in the Avalon Forum who crave a deeper understanding of the human condition. So I must persist in my efforts, and I will.

    “Hate speech” is, of course, a very complicated and contentious area of human interaction, but one which is extremely important and of increasing relevance (unfortunately) today. No longer is it possible to consider hate speech to be a weapon utilized only by deranged third world demagogues or upstart National Socialists of the past. No. With the advent of the all-pervasive and all-intrusive internet, hate speech is now in a golden era, a time when it is rampant and ascendant within our social discourse and our very psyches. It is simultaneously a beast that is dragonlike, full of ostentatious, fiery destruction and at the same time something far more subtle, an insidious nascent germ set into the protoplasm of the victim, growing stealthily within. It is a scourge that must be acknowledged and comprehended and, I would venture, one of the most damaging forces that our civilization has to reckon with.

    The predicament in which Alex Jones finds himself, with respect to the legal consequences of his hate speech, and his vain attempts to save himself from financial ruin, (to the point of actually disowning his own claims, saying that "Sandy Hook probably happened") is now ground zero for what is surely to be a defining moment for the American notion of free speech. That the United States Supreme Court will have to weigh in at some point is very likely, and its decisions will have ramifications extending far into the lives of all of us. Whether having the court stacked with right leaning thinkers is an effect that is yet to be determined in this area.

    Examining the concept of hate speech offers up the possibility spending a lifetime in the back and forth of moral concepts and applicability of the role that language plays. Such is not my intention – this lifetime is already too short to spend much effort on the unsolvable mystery that involves ideological fixations, psychological and spiritual core beliefs and other personal discernments. The shibboleth that is Alex Jones is but one manifestation of the looming crisis. The issue at hand, in my view, is not whether censorship is being imposed on Alex Jones because he poses a threat to The Powers That Be, but because he has incited violence in his deranged rants. In other words, there are limits to "free speech".

    That said, I would like to ask your indulgence to allow a break in my essay. On my return, I intend to further my investigation. Till then,

    Be Well everyone

    Brian

    ===

    [ Mod-edit:
    I disagree with your emboldened claim that Alex Jones has incited violence. See also Bill's Post #274 and my Post #276, below. -- Paul. ]
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 17th August 2018 at 01:11.
    A human being is a part of the whole, called by us "Universe," a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest—a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.

    Albert E.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fellow Aspirant For This Post:

    Satori (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  17. Link to Post #250
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd January 2011
    Location
    Ignoring Your Outrage
    Language
    Discordian
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks
    29,096
    Thanked 40,082 times in 4,764 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by norman (here)
    I dissagree there PL. That's continuing the same merry go round. What's small and independent one year is a monolithic menace to humanity a few years later.


    A level playing field is not something to be ideologically paranoid about.


    What absolutely confounds me to the point of banging my head on the wall is, why are Americans SO proud of their bill of rights at exactly the same time as they are stuck with superglue to the principle of corporate autonomy ?
    Dialing back corporate power and enforcing rules on them is one thing, doing so on the whole of the internet and its users is quite another. What we have is quite the sticky situation, and government rules applied to the internet at large is definitely not which way we want to go, as government and corporations alike make every attempt to end run around our beloved documents with the rules and rights they enumerate.

  18. Link to Post #251
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,052
    Thanks
    9,999
    Thanked 56,255 times in 8,324 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by PurpleLama (here)
    Quote Posted by norman (here)
    I dissagree there PL. That's continuing the same merry go round. What's small and independent one year is a monolithic menace to humanity a few years later.


    A level playing field is not something to be ideologically paranoid about.


    What absolutely confounds me to the point of banging my head on the wall is, why are Americans SO proud of their bill of rights at exactly the same time as they are stuck with superglue to the principle of corporate autonomy ?
    Dialing back corporate power and enforcing rules on them is one thing, doing so on the whole of the internet and its users is quite another. What we have is quite the sticky situation, and government rules applied to the internet at large is definitely not which way we want to go, as government and corporations alike make every attempt to end run around our beloved documents with the rules and rights they enumerate.

    Constitutional rules, not government rules.


    All the governement has to do is set a level playing field and let the corporations apply to be allowed to provide the services. If they all choose to run away, then the government can do it itself.


    What would be so bad about a search engine at least as good as google that was set up and run by an accountable ( FOIA requests etc ) department of the US government ? The government could even enforce a replicative transition of all US user accounts with Facebook and Youtube to their own system. That is, they could force the corporations to not destroy the accounts while they pull out of the American social media market due to not agreeing with the new rules. The users could wake up one morning with their accounts intact but running on a new service system out of a government department, again, FOIA friendly into the bargain.


    It only needs some imagination and resolution to kill the cancer. The corporations can do whatever they want, but they'll have to go and do it on their own.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), PurpleLama (15th August 2018)

  20. Link to Post #252
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,052
    Thanks
    9,999
    Thanked 56,255 times in 8,324 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)


    . . The predicament in which Alex Jones finds himself, with respect to the legal consequences of his hate speech . .



    Explain that bit to me in simple terms, please.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), PurpleLama (15th August 2018)

  22. Link to Post #253
    Avalon Member Deux Corbeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th August 2018
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    77
    Posts
    476
    Thanks
    5,367
    Thanked 3,069 times in 456 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    -

    Vimeo joins Facebook, Apple, YouTube and other tech giants in banning InfoWars' Alex Jones from its platform


    The video-hosting website Vimeo removed InfoWars from its platform for violating the site's Terms of Service.

    It follows similar moves by almost every major Silicon Valley company, including Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Spotify and Pinterest. Twitter remains one of the last holdouts to keep Jones and InfoWars' content up on its site.

    Jones appeared to seek out Vimeo as a refuge after he found himself banned from most popular social media platforms.

    InfoWars posted more than 50 new videos on Vimeo by Thursday and Friday, Business Insider said.

    Before that, the channel had fewer than a dozen videos uploaded to it.

    Vimeo's Trust & Safety team manually reviewed the videos uploaded to InfoWars' channel and moved within 48 hours to delete them from the site.

    As of Monday, InfoWars' Vimeo account shows a notice that says 'Sorry we couldn't find that page.'

    Last week, several employees raised concerns internally at Vimeo that Jones' account was allowed to stay up on the site, Business Insider reported.

    'We can confirm that Vimeo removed InfoWars’ account on Sunday, August 12 following the uploading of videos on Thursday and Friday that violated our Terms of Service prohibitions on discriminatory and hateful content,' a Vimeo spokesperson told MailOnline.

    'Vimeo has notified the account owner and issued a refund.'

    Vimeo CEO Anjali Sud is expected to make a company-wide announcement about the decision on Monday.

    This means that Twitter is one of the last popular platforms where Jones and InfoWars can post content.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...-platform.html
    Last edited by Deux Corbeaux; 15th August 2018 at 15:29.

  23. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Deux Corbeaux For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), Hervé (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), Nasu (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  24. Link to Post #254
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,454
    Thanks
    11,372
    Thanked 22,088 times in 2,423 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
    Re:
    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
    If I ever post hate speech in this forum, then I would expect to be banned.
    But Brian, what's hate speech?

    Please define it precisely. Your post that I quoted implies that you think you know exactly what it is.

    (Maybe others can try to do the same. But do note that it has NO formal legal definition.)

    This is central and important to this entire thread.




    Why yes, Bill, as a matter of fact, when I use language, I usually DO think I know what I mean, a condition not too alien to most of us around the here. This would, by extension, include the concept of “hate speech”. And while legal assignations of its meaning are always in flux, the concept itself is deeply enshrined in a plenitude of legal declarations. Entire countries have signed on to definitions of it. As always, though, its validity and consequences are to be decided on a case by case basis.

    But here we are faced with a historical conundrum, aren’t we? The subjective nature of language requires a constant vigilance coincident with its use – else we risk the danger of confusing our audience. Clarity is key to understanding, and careful choice in one’s diction is always of utmost concern. And nowhere, not incidentally, is diction more germane than when deciphering the intent of those who wield hate speech.
    Lewis Carrol had some serious fun with the subjective nature of language when he penned the encounter between Alice and Humpty Dumpty as …

    Attachment 38786

    "I don't know what you mean by 'glory'," Alice said.
    Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't- till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
    "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
    "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less."
    "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
    "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-that's all."

    Through the Looking Glass, Ch. VI

    Word meaning, as Carrol so beautifully points out, can be rather malleable, depending on the intent of the one using it, and it behooves all of us to try to nail down the essences and boundaries of our thinking, especially when we embark on dialogues and arguments with others.

    Herewith, then, is my rather feeble attempt at “nailing down” the amoeba that is hate speech.

    To begin, I promise that I will eschew the temptation to resort to using the famous claim uttered by Justice Potter Stewart, to wit:

    The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio.[1][2][3] In explaining why the material at issue in the case was not obscene under the Roth test, and therefore was protected speech that could not be censored, Stewart wrote:

    I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.[4]

    Tempting as it is, and as common-sensical as it is, such an approach as ‘knowing it when you see it’ will do little to sate the appetites of those of us in the Avalon Forum who crave a deeper understanding of the human condition. So I must persist in my efforts, and I will.

    “Hate speech” is, of course, a very complicated and contentious area of human interaction, but one which is extremely important and of increasing relevance (unfortunately) today. No longer is it possible to consider hate speech to be a weapon utilized only by deranged third world demagogues or upstart National Socialists of the past. No. With the advent of the all-pervasive and all-intrusive internet, hate speech is now in a golden era, a time when it is rampant and ascendant within our social discourse and our very psyches. It is simultaneously a beast that is dragonlike, full of ostentatious, fiery destruction and at the same time something far more subtle, an insidious nascent germ set into the protoplasm of the victim, growing stealthily within. It is a scourge that must be acknowledged and comprehended and, I would venture, one of the most damaging forces that our civilization has to reckon with.

    The predicament in which Alex Jones finds himself, with respect to the legal consequences of his hate speech, and his vain attempts to save himself from financial ruin, (to the point of actually disowning his own claims, saying that "Sandy Hook probably happened") is now ground zero for what is surely to be a defining moment for the American notion of free speech. That the United States Supreme Court will have to weigh in at some point is very likely, and its decisions will have ramifications extending far into the lives of all of us. Whether having the court stacked with right leaning thinkers is an effect that is yet to be determined in this area.

    Examining the concept of hate speech offers up the possibility spending a lifetime in the back and forth of moral concepts and applicability of the role that language plays. Such is not my intention – this lifetime is already too short to spend much effort on the unsolvable mystery that involves ideological fixations, psychological and spiritual core beliefs and other personal discernments. The shibboleth that is Alex Jones is but one manifestation of the looming crisis. The issue at hand, in my view, is not whether censorship is being imposed on Alex Jones because he poses a threat to The Powers That Be, but because he has incited violence in his deranged rants. In other words, there are limits to "free speech".

    That said, I would like to ask your indulgence to allow a break in my essay. On my return, I intend to further my investigation. Till then,

    Be Well everyone

    Brian
    I thank Brian for his post because I find it to be very thoughtful and well-written, not because I agree that AJ is guilty of inciting violence through hate speech--whatever that is.

  25. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th August 2018), Ernie Nemeth (15th August 2018), mountain_jim (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  26. Link to Post #255
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,661
    Thanks
    26,233
    Thanked 36,612 times in 5,382 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    And while flowery tales are told and arguments bantered about free speech takes its biggest hit yet. And in a few days or a coupla weeks this will all but be forgotten.

    Just like Nazi Germany in the thirties, no one cared, no one acted, no one made a difference. Soon dissidents and even moderates were disappearing in the night. Soon the populace became parnoid and silent and obedient - lest they meet the fate of those already disappeared.

    That is our next step too. Who will remember us? Who will remember me when I am disappeared. Since my teens I have continually stated that we are at war, that the very system we look to to save us is the enemy.

    No one listens, but they do muddy the waters with this or that distinction or observation. We are at war - an ideological war that has been unable to win the rhetorical theatre so now we move to elliminating dissent and alternate veiws.

    Those of you who think that this is no big deal take heart, your counterparts in Nazi Germany thought the same...
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

    Free will can only be as free as the mind that conceives it.

  27. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th August 2018), Blacklight43 (15th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), norman (16th August 2018), Satori (15th August 2018), Valerie Villars (15th August 2018)

  28. Link to Post #256
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,984
    Thanks
    31,354
    Thanked 127,191 times in 21,080 posts

    Exclamation Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Jordan Peterson Reacts to ALEX JONES Being DEPLATFORMED



    Jordan Peterson joins Steven Crowder to discuss Alex Jones/Info Wars being banned from various social media/tech sites and whether or not platforms such as YouTube should be treated as public utilities.


    Alex Jones himself said he was the canary in the coal mine. It is stomach-churning to see liberals cheerleading the silencing of dissent by billion-dollar corporations. What hypocrites and moral cowards the Left has become!
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 15th August 2018 at 20:31.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  29. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th August 2018), Ernie Nemeth (15th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), norman (16th August 2018), Satori (15th August 2018), T Smith (16th August 2018)

  30. Link to Post #257
    United States Avalon Member Foxie Loxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th September 2015
    Location
    Central NY
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,078
    Thanks
    67,683
    Thanked 17,639 times in 2,960 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Ernie.....I would rather say that more people are being made aware of the fact that there IS a war going on & better yet(!) are DOING something about it!

    The "Tip of the Spear" has made a dent or "they" wouldn't be worried about him!!

  31. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Foxie Loxie For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (15th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018)

  32. Link to Post #258
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,621
    Thanks
    30,533
    Thanked 138,643 times in 21,530 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    Quote Posted by T Smith (here)
    Excellent essay/ analysis... very enjoyable read. Although I think you are refining Orlov's analysis by characterizing his notion of collusion as "some element of or near the US Government..." As far as I could glean from Orlov he is coming at this from more of an old-school-Soviet perspective where he envisages the government as the centralized power giving the marching orders (in his words, Big Tech then "salutes"); I believe it is true that in the old USSR the big tech companies would have been the lapdogs for the government/KGB; but I would posit whatever the power structure undergirding this conspiracy isn't the US Government, per se. Call it Deep State. Call it some power "of or near" as you have, but not the US Government itself, which is a lap dog to them. Big Tech itself either is, or is closer to this power than the US Government itself.
    Yes - I was "being kind to" Dimitri Orlov when I diluted his "government" to "elements of or near the government".

    Yes - Deep State something - a topic in its own right.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  33. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (16th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018), Satori (15th August 2018), T Smith (16th August 2018)

  34. Link to Post #259
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,661
    Thanks
    26,233
    Thanked 36,612 times in 5,382 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    I agree Paul. A business is led by one person, easily manipulated. A country is run by many people with many interests and little power in any one hand.

    It is a misnomer to call the president, 'the most powerful man in the free world'. That distinction can only be held by someone with massive amounts of money - and wealth - and influence. A Soros or Zuckerberg or Gates type, or a Mafioso don or an El Chapo or a pope type. Greedy or evil seems to be the only categories...
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

    Free will can only be as free as the mind that conceives it.

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (16th August 2018), norman (16th August 2018)

  36. Link to Post #260
    United States Avalon Member Valerie Villars's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th November 2017
    Age
    62
    Posts
    2,885
    Thanks
    32,001
    Thanked 20,435 times in 2,846 posts

    Default Re: YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

    In China, they are being ordered to replace pictures of Jesus with those of the President of that country. They are confiscating Bibles. If you don't like something, just hit delete and pretend they never existed.
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone when we are uncool." From the movie "Almost Famous""l "Let yourself stand cool and composed before a million universes." Walt Whitman

  37. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Valerie Villars For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (16th August 2018), Foxie Loxie (16th August 2018), KiwiElf (15th August 2018)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst 1 3 13 23 28 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts