Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE)

Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) (http://projectavalon.net/forum/index.php)
-   Project Camelot General Discussion (http://projectavalon.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   David Wilcock quetion ! (http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3036)

Morphious 09-22-2008 03:49 AM

David Wilcock quetion !
 
This Question is for David Wilcock only ! What do you think about Oct 14 2008 ? hmmmmm ??? This will be interesting "IF" he replies ! :smoke:

Love/Light 13 09-22-2008 04:16 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I don't believe David Wilcock is not a member of this forum...............

Racsouran 09-22-2008 04:17 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Love/Light 13 (Post 24467)
I don't believe David Wilcock is not a member of this forum...............


maybe not yet. who knows hahaha

goody8504 09-22-2008 03:12 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
this thread would probably more likely get a response if it were posted on the forum at david's website

Malletzky 10-07-2008 09:56 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
please go to David's website and find the answer to this question. It's there and it is clear:mfr_lol::trumpet:

Whitewolf 10-07-2008 11:25 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
David's messageboard is subject to review of all its posts by moderators before it's allowed onto the actual site. Sad but true.

zuni 10-07-2008 11:42 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
why....where is the freedom of speach....???? don´t like that....

Atk1d 10-08-2008 01:45 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I agree where's the freedom he so highly speeks of????? seems like he's not very good at practicing what he preaches.
Then there is the possibility of people paying attention and asking ligitimate questions,sensible questions, clearly the type that would make him look bad!!!
I mean really why else would he have a team to moderate the questions, of coarse he'll answer with the removal of some questions is for time only and in no way is ment to convey censoring of any individual or their concerns. blah blah, what ever!
good entertainment value.
not meaning to be negative, but come on it's plain censorship no matter how that pie is sliced.:mad3:

333mark333 10-08-2008 02:13 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
One word of negativity can start a chain reaction.David does not want his site perverted by cheap shots and violent words. This will only discredit his hard work for us.
Look at what is happening on here. Words are powerful!, a guest comes on see's the bickering and off they go.
Positivity cannot be allowed to drown in a sea of ignorance.

Freedom of speech is great but some people on here obviously have problems communicating, and they resort to slander which is not great.

LiquidSwordz 10-08-2008 02:22 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morphious (Post 24442)
This Question is for David Wilcock only ! What do you think about Oct 14 2008 ? hmmmmm ??? This will be interesting "IF" he replies ! :smoke:


Oh great, now we have 12 year olds in this forum now.

wes_whitewolf 10-08-2008 02:28 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 333mark333 (Post 43241)
One word of negativity can start a chain reaction.David does not want his site perverted by cheap shots and violent words. This will only discredit his hard work for us.
Look at what is happening on here. Words are powerful!, a guest comes on see's the bickering and off they go.
Positivity cannot be allowed to drown in a sea of ignorance.

Freedom of speech is great but some people on here obviously have problems communicating, and they resort to slander which is not great.

Remember what the Bloodliner Insider said about written words and how they emit energy as well as spoken? It's true!!!

undetected 10-08-2008 03:42 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I know perfectly well what David would answer to that "quetion." Apparently unlike you, I listen when people speak. Also unlike you, I can spell. Man I'm a genius...

linkes 10-08-2008 03:56 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I know! I tried talking about how these two Nazi p addicts tried to assassin Obama and they rejected my thread, pity though it was a fantastic piece alas not good enough for David ::thumbdown::mad3:

So I just don’t go into his forum anymore::roll1:

All I do is read his bloggs and chat about them on other sites and share my views with those who allow freedom of :trumpet:

I just hope this forum doesnt go that way:bleh:

linkes 10-08-2008 04:01 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 333mark333 (Post 43241)
One word of negativity can start a chain reaction.David does not want his site perverted by cheap shots and violent words. This will only discredit his hard work for us.
Look at what is happening on here. Words are powerful!, a guest comes on see's the bickering and off they go.
Positivity cannot be allowed to drown in a sea of ignorance.

Freedom of speech is great but some people on here obviously have problems communicating, and they resort to slander which is not great.

dont you think the whole rejection of negativity is a bit of contradiction considering David follows the law of one ra material teachings, where there is no seperation and all is one?

mm I think the ignorance here is not accepting all as one be it negative or positive, reactive or active.

There is also the simple addition of a report abuse button instead of moderating every thread poor guy no wounder he has so many emails to read.:lmao:

333mark333 10-08-2008 04:17 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by linkes (Post 43370)
dont you think the whole rejection of negativity is a bit of contradiction considering David follows the law of one ra material teachings, where there is no seperation and all is one?

mm I think the ignorance here is not accepting all as one be it negative or positive, reactive or active.

There is also the simple addition of a report abuse button instead of moderating every thread poor guy no wounder he has so many emails to read.:lmao:


I agree with your point but...

In these times The focus of all of us must be to Transcend Negativity, if we want to debate then lets do it privately between us. Let not our Words pervert the hungry minds who NEED our guidance.

That one word of negativity may just sway the mind and cause them to enter back into the great sleep.

Our job as lightworkers is to evolve us not De-evolve.

Keep the posts in the vibration of Melchizedek and FREE your brothers/sisters.

333mark333 10-08-2008 04:56 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wes_whitewolf (Post 43261)
Remember what the Bloodliner Insider said about written words and how they emit energy as well as spoken? It's true!!!

Wes,
Here's the scientific proof. Check out MR EMOTO'S "The Message from Water" Do not know how to link as i am just learning computers.

Thought forms given energy produce Action. :)

linkes 10-08-2008 07:56 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 333mark333 (Post 43386)
I agree with your point but...

In these times The focus of all of us must be to Transcend Negativity, if we want to debate then lets do it privately between us. Let not our Words pervert the hungry minds who NEED our guidance.

That one word of negativity may just sway the mind and cause them to enter back into the great sleep.

Our job as lightworkers is to evolve us not De-evolve.

Keep the posts in the vibration of Melchizedek and FREE your brothers/sisters.

shouldn’t a good debate entitle others to make up their own choices whether its the positive path or the negative path should we all not be entitled to the choice and the ability to view both sides of the coin.

There’s no perverting and there’s no influencing others choices or their hungry minds people need to learn their own level of discernment

So no I don’t agree with you

Orion Morris 10-08-2008 08:11 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidSwordz (Post 43255)
Oh great, now we have 12 year olds in this forum now.

great liquidswardz!!!

and your signiture says that you "throw rocks at fat kidz"

goody8504 10-08-2008 08:21 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by undetected (Post 43348)
I know perfectly well what David would answer to that "quetion." Apparently unlike you, I listen when people speak. Also unlike you, I can spell. Man I'm a genius...

too bad your gammar isn't as good as your spelling

Mike_Jetson 10-08-2008 09:50 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Im really bored of you freedom of speech Wilcock complainers

I wouldnt let you wipe your muddy feet on my carpet because I would be the one to have to clean it up.

333mark333 10-08-2008 10:42 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by linkes (Post 44265)
shouldn’t a good debate entitle others to make up their own choices whether its the positive path or the negative path should we all not be entitled to the choice and the ability to view both sides of the coin.

There’s no perverting and there’s no influencing others choices or there hungry minds people need to learn their own level of discernment

So no I don’t agree with you


If people want to learn about the negative path go to another forum.

We want this to be positive.

There is a difference between a positive debate and down right Negativity.

Evolving beings ( us ) need guidance

Do you not guide the children to grow so that their full human potential is reached.

Why are you here? for a debate.

Avalon is about positivity and Truth.

Negativity need not apply.

:)

linkes 10-08-2008 11:47 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
ok last time I am saying anything this is getting ridiculous

To assume I am one who follows the path of self service is naive but none the less all I am doing is giving two side to the coin that’s it.

I believe in choice and acceptance although it is hard sometimes to accept certain things I believe its imperative that we do, if we want to move forward.

Look at the world and it religions how the fight over wrong and right how they condemn each other for different beliefs

mm sounds familiar

Peace and Blessings
Linkes

333mark333 10-09-2008 12:52 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by linkes (Post 44615)
ok last time I am saying anything this is getting ridiculous

To assume I am one who follows the path of self service is naive but none the less all I am doing is giving two side to the coin that’s it.

I believe in choice and acceptance although it is hard sometimes to accept certain things I believe its imperative that we do, if we want to move forward.

Look at the world and it religions how the fight over wrong and right how they condemn each other for different beliefs

mm sounds familiar

Peace and Blessings
Linkes



Peace and Blessings to you friend :) There are 2 sides.

bodzoyfa 10-09-2008 02:09 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidSwordz (Post 43255)
Oh great, now we have 12 year olds in this forum now.

I really dont want to engage in your mindless chatter, but I cant help myself. You have nothing but antogonistic immature approaches to peoples comments that you differ with. I believe you are either a disinformation agent or a young punk who doesnt have a clue as to what you're talking about. Either way you dont need to be on this site. Clean it up and grow up or take a hike. Seems like some fresh air would do you some good.

Dantheman62 10-09-2008 02:49 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bodzoyfa (Post 44771)
I really dont want to engage in your mindless chatter, but I cant help myself. You have nothing but antogonistic immature approaches to peoples comments that you differ with. I believe you are either a disinformation agent or a young punk who doesnt have a clue as to what you're talking about. Either way you dont need to be on this site. Clean it up and grow up or take a hike. Seems like some fresh air would do you some good.

Amen!

undetected 10-11-2008 03:13 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by goody8504 (Post 44328)
too bad your gammar isn't as good as your spelling

Interesting that you had to edit your post 3 minutes after you sent it. As English isn't my native language, please tell me what was wrong with my "gammar," I like to improve every now and then. Thanks.

Evolution22 10-11-2008 03:21 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
sorry I didn't bother to look at all the other posts, but David already answered the oct.14 issue. He said it was bogus and it will not happen.

Hope this helps...

Theresa 10-11-2008 04:27 AM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
As I recall, he said that it's not going to happen because we are not ready for a contact of that degree, and that they will not interfere with our free will.

I heard the exact same message when channeling the galactic federation. (I channeled it before I heard Wilcock's take on it, which was the same as what I heard.)

What I was told is that there are two reactions that they can not invoke in human beings. THe first one is fear, the source of that is obvious. The second is more subtle, but none the less a non-allowed interference. That is that people would think that they were here to rescue them, and would stop doing their inner spiritual work because now they wouldn't have to be responsible for their own growth, because they were going to be rescued. They say, sorry, no one gets out of doing their "grow up" work....

so, that's why it's not for real and would not happen.

Just for the record, as a channeler myself who channels very high truth vibration (sign up for my free newsletter at www.forgiveandawaken.com and see for yourself), when I went to "blossomgoodchild's" website, something felt "off" to me, like maybe she's a psy ops plant. The vibe was not that high.

You can tell psy ops spiritual disinfo messages because it will SEEM to be communicating truth, but it's more like wonder bread-LOOKS like the real thing, but just doesn't have any real substance.

Judge for yourself, just tune into your heart center and see what you feel.

5th dimensional ET's (and higher) would never say things like, "you MUST trust us," or "you MUST listen to us." They would never say that. I am concerned that this could be part of project blue beam, but I guess we'll know in about 5 days...

Just sharing, as usual!

Blessings!

undetected 10-11-2008 12:04 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Theresa (Post 47144)
What I was told is that there are two reactions that they can not invoke in human beings. THe first one is fear, the source of that is obvious. The second is more subtle, but none the less a non-allowed interference. That is that people would think that they were here to rescue them, and would stop doing their inner spiritual work because now they wouldn't have to be responsible for their own growth, because they were going to be rescued. They say, sorry, no one gets out of doing their "grow up" work....

Yes! This is exactly what people need to understand. If you think somebody will "save" you and you won't have to grow up, you got it wrong. Theresa is right about the reasons as well as about David's position. Nice post.

franciejones 10-11-2008 02:12 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I had a dream about Bill, Kerry and David this morning. It was unpleasant. It was weird because I don't even think about David Wilcock and the dream was very real

goody8504 10-11-2008 05:44 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by undetected (Post 47083)
Interesting that you had to edit your post 3 minutes after you sent it. As English isn't my native language, please tell me what was wrong with my "gammar," I like to improve every now and then. Thanks.

for starters, just because english is your first language doesn't mean you know jack about grammar. secondly, what does my editing my post have to do with anything? i saw a typo, so i fixed it.
as for your mistakes...'apparently' and 'also' are transitions, meaning they require a comma. my point was simpyl that we all make mistakes. you made a threat ripping on somebodys typo, and then proceeded to make mistakes in your own response. if you don't want people picking out every little mistake you make, don't give others a hard time because of theirs. i personally couldn't care less if your punctuation sucks, but grow up

undetected 10-11-2008 07:16 PM

Re: goody8504
 
Thanks for explaining, I never understood commas in English very well.
Of course the spelling matter was hardly the point of my post. The initial post was really poor on every level. Even against the guidelines of the forum. And it shouldn't be that hard to at least get the title right. No big deal, I know, but no need to decrease the quality of the posts more than necessary.

larissarissa 10-11-2008 08:28 PM

Re: David Wilcock quetion !
 
I'd like to respond in some way, not sure how. How did a discussion of what DW thinks about Oct. 14 turn into bickering about someone's grammar and whether posts are negative or positive or whatever? Well, actually I do know. Someone says something, then the other person takes it personally, then they just can't stop themselves, and on it goes. I think when it gets really nasty a moderator stops the thread and that's that. :mad3: :lmao:

How can anyone hope to improve this world when they haven't improved themselves? Still, I believe that it's all good, bickering and all. Everyone starts off immature, that's the nature of growing up. Tolerance, acceptance, these are spiritual principles we're working on. Not easy to learn, at least for me.

Polarity is the name of the game in this 3D world, it's supposed to speed up the learning process. I try to imagine what my hero would do in the situation (my imaginary martial arts spiritual warrior type person). He certainly wouldn't lose his cool no matter what. But he's too serious, I like to add a bit of humor, lighten things up.

http://kr.youtube.com/watch?v=XiDmMBIyfsU


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon