Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - Coming Polar Shift-Jan.11th 2009.12 audio vids.

Jnana · 01-13-2009, 06:50 PM

I'm afraid I don't find Brent Miller at all credible. He claims to be using a scientific approach, but his arguments are internally inconsistent, he makes claims that have absolutely no support or are inconsistent with real data collected over decades, and he repeatedly spews utter nonsense (such as "we can't create a purely magnetic field" - oh really? what then, is a permanent magnet?).

I will provide a more detailed dissection of this interview if and when I get a chance. To start with, take a look at this article on sea floor spreading. The data showing magnetic pole reversals captured in the rock of the sea floor symmetrically around the mid-atlantic ridge is one piece of the puzzle that established plate tectonics. There are many other pieces, including the fossile record. The movement of the continents from Pangea to the current locations did not happen over a few days as Miller claims. The age data on the sea floor rocks IS consistent with the slow movement model, including the age of the Pacific basin relative to the Atlantic. This is one of the most thoroughly established theories in modern science. It was highly controversial at first, and it took a lot of data to convince the nay sayers. Miller is either dishonest or totally misinformed.

The "galactive plane" discussion is even more nonsensical. A small gravitational force causing a geographical pole shift? More nonsense. Oh, right, they did a computer model.

I can't help but wonder why so many groups like the Horizon Project are promoting these doomsday fabrications. One possibility is that the PTB are going to crash civilization and they want us to blame external forces rather than them so that when they offer to "save" (enslave) us, we'll accept willingly (problem-reaction-solution, as usual, they create the problem). Another possibility is that this is "fair warning" to prepare, even though the real cause of the problem is not the one described. Perhaps both? Is it just to make money? Something else?

In any case, please use some discernment. Use what you know. Learn enough to challenge these claims. Don't take this stuff at face value.

01-13-2009, 06:50 PM	#5
Jnana Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Indiana Posts: 653	Re: Coming Polar Shift-Jan.11th 2009.12 audio vids. I'm afraid I don't find Brent Miller at all credible. He claims to be using a scientific approach, but his arguments are internally inconsistent, he makes claims that have absolutely no support or are inconsistent with real data collected over decades, and he repeatedly spews utter nonsense (such as "we can't create a purely magnetic field" - oh really? what then, is a permanent magnet?). I will provide a more detailed dissection of this interview if and when I get a chance. To start with, take a look at this article on sea floor spreading. The data showing magnetic pole reversals captured in the rock of the sea floor symmetrically around the mid-atlantic ridge is one piece of the puzzle that established plate tectonics. There are many other pieces, including the fossile record. The movement of the continents from Pangea to the current locations did not happen over a few days as Miller claims. The age data on the sea floor rocks IS consistent with the slow movement model, including the age of the Pacific basin relative to the Atlantic. This is one of the most thoroughly established theories in modern science. It was highly controversial at first, and it took a lot of data to convince the nay sayers. Miller is either dishonest or totally misinformed. The "galactive plane" discussion is even more nonsensical. A small gravitational force causing a geographical pole shift? More nonsense. Oh, right, they did a computer model. I can't help but wonder why so many groups like the Horizon Project are promoting these doomsday fabrications. One possibility is that the PTB are going to crash civilization and they want us to blame external forces rather than them so that when they offer to "save" (enslave) us, we'll accept willingly (problem-reaction-solution, as usual, they create the problem). Another possibility is that this is "fair warning" to prepare, even though the real cause of the problem is not the one described. Perhaps both? Is it just to make money? Something else? In any case, please use some discernment. Use what you know. Learn enough to challenge these claims. Don't take this stuff at face value.