Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - What Will It Take to Defeat the "New World Order"?

Seashore · 05-12-2009, 12:56 PM

While pondering this question, the term "passive aggressive" keeps coming to my mind...

So I searched the term, looking for confirmation that people being passive aggressive would have anything to do with defeating the NWO...

First, here is a definition of the term, from a blurb on the website wiseGEEK:

"The term passive-aggressive is used to describe someone who exhibits manipulative behavior within their personality. On the surface, the traits may appear as stubbornness or a polite unwillingness to agree with a situation. The end result is that the person is manipulating you to turn to their way of thinking."

I like this quote from the same blurb:

"The term passive-aggressive is thought to have originated during World War II. Soldiers were found to be shirking their duties, but in ways that were not openly disobedient. The army used the term passive-aggressive in a bulletin sent to soldiers regarding this behavior. Many soldiers saw this behavior as a simple response in order to keep from being killed during the war."

05-12-2009, 12:56 PM	#65
Seashore Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,564	Re: What Will It Take to Defeat the "New World Order"? While pondering this question, the term "passive aggressive" keeps coming to my mind... So I searched the term, looking for confirmation that people being passive aggressive would have anything to do with defeating the NWO... First, here is a definition of the term, from a blurb on the website wiseGEEK: "The term passive-aggressive is used to describe someone who exhibits manipulative behavior within their personality. On the surface, the traits may appear as stubbornness or a polite unwillingness to agree with a situation. The end result is that the person is manipulating you to turn to their way of thinking." I like this quote from the same blurb: "The term passive-aggressive is thought to have originated during World War II. Soldiers were found to be shirking their duties, but in ways that were not openly disobedient. The army used the term passive-aggressive in a bulletin sent to soldiers regarding this behavior. Many soldiers saw this behavior as a simple response in order to keep from being killed during the war."