Quote:
Originally Posted by trainedobserver
Well I most strongly disagree. It is about results. What bears out good and reliable results? Examining evidence, asking questions, getting answers, conducting experiments, checking results, or "how we feel about it"?
|
But you're still saying how YOU feel about it; isn't THAT based on blood sugar as well?
We differ in opinion, TrainedObserver. And that's okay! That doesn't mean we can't be friends; that doesn't mean we are enemies. It just means that - based on the world we each live in, based on the experiences we've both had, based on who we are as souls - we see things from a different perspective. Maybe someday, you'll see the world from my angle - maybe someday, I'll see the world from yours.
Your vision of "good and reliable results" IS examining evidence, asking questions, getting answers, conducting experiments, and checking results; MY vision of "good and reliable results" is reading and absorbing, asking questions (we have that in common!
), looking inside, meditation, and reflection upon my own past experiences or intuitive feelings and finding how it applies now.
We all have a path to truth; it's just that said paths may look a little different. And I appreciate that difference - it surely makes the world interesting! Could you imagine how boring and uneventful the world would be if everything you said to people was always agreed with?! Some of the most passionate conversations, where the most answers are found, are those that stem from disagreements. (And some of the most passionate conversations, where the most answers are found, are those that stem from agreements.
)
We are all one, TrainedObserver!
<3