View Single Post
Old 09-24-2008, 04:59 PM   #4
matrix
Avalon Senior Member
 
matrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 30
Default Re: Radiant Zones - Unity & Diversity - Social construction?

Max-Neef and his colleagues have developed a classification of human needs by which communities can identify their "wealths" and "poverties" according to how these needs are satisfied.
Human Scale Development is defined as "focused and based on the satisfaction of fundamental human needs, on the generation of growing levels of self-reliance, and on the construction of organic articulations of people with nature and technology, of global processes with local activity, of the personal with the social, of planning with autonomy, and of civil society with the state." (Max-Neef et al, 1987:12)
The main contribution that Max-Neef makes to the understanding of needs is the distinction made between needs and satisfiers. Human needs are seen as few, finite and classifiable (as distinct from the conventional notion that "wants" are infinite and insatiable). Not only this, they are constant through all human cultures and across historical time periods. What changes over time and between cultures is the way these needs are satisfied. It is important that human needs are understood as a system - i.e. they are interrelated and interactive. There is no hierarchy of needs (apart from the basic need for subsistence or survival) as postulated by Western psychologists such as Maslow, rather, simultaneity, complementarity and trade-offs are features of the process of needs satisfaction.

He classifies the fundamental human needs as:
subsistence, protection, affection, understanding, participation, recreation(in the sense of leisure, time to reflect, or idleness), creation, identity and freedom.

Needs are also defined in categories of being, having and doing.

Once we realise that we basically have the same needs, we might start to focus how we are the same, instead of focussing on what differentiates us.
matrix is offline   Reply With Quote