Hi David,
I think the answer to that one is in the disclaimer on the Camelot site which states that the owners do not necessarily agree with the witnesses or posters of information.
At the end of the day it's for the reader to arrive at their own conclusion.
I always feel the need to question and rattle cages to get answers so I can arrive at my own conclusions about some of the posts, not only in this forum, but in any forum and also about any subject that catches my eye.
The burden is not for one to disprove what somebody posts, but is indeed on the poster to prove what they are saying. If they cannot prove this,they can only expect not to be believed, it's par for the course.
Of course time will tell the truth..... always.
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by David
Carol, can you explain how the criteria of disinformation and creditability are scaled here on Project Camelot? Is there a set belief already in place that is used as the basis for comparison?
|