Junk DNA Contains an Incredible Secret

[morguana]

Junk DNA Contains an Incredible Secret According to Researchers
By Chris Capps

In human DNA, only 97 percent is actually used in coding for anything useful. The rest of the standard human’s genetic material is called “junk DNA.” Junk DNA, it was thought, held no purpose, and served merely as a placeholder for the more useful DNA around it. Recently, however, researchers on The Human Genome project have been conducting several tests and come to a shocking conclusion: This Junk DNA may hold genetic material that is extra terrestrial in origin!

For years there have been reports by abductees about alien abduction and tests. Often abductees will tell of alien captors telling them the entire process is for “genetic testing” or to put it another way, to combine human and alien DNA in order to create a hybrid race. Rarely is it conjectured, however, that this hybrid race may actually be walking the earth now.

Could we be the ongoing project? Professor Samuel Chang, leader of the group exploring the idea says the junk DNA clearly seems to have a life of its own. He further adds that this material “has its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs.” He goes on to explain the theory arising from this mysterious link, “Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria in Petri dishes. We can’t know their motives – whether it was a scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling life in the universe.”

The idea of humans being seeded here by extra-terrestrials is not a new one. In fact, the late great thinker and futurist Charles Fort once wrote, “Earth is a farm. We are someone else’s property.” Several ancient traditions, including Sumerian ones claim life on earth came due to intervention of beings that lived in the sky or in the stars.

So how much stock can we put into this really? Aside from the fact that these are well respected scientists working with the human genome project, and trusted with one of the greatest undertakings of modern man, they are not alone in their assertion. Several people from other areas of genetic research have surmised that human life may have “reached” earth rather than originating here as an extremophile in volcanoes as others have postulated.

Still, it does seem like quite an extreme claim to make. Even the most respected geneticists in the world will have an uphill battle in convincing the majority of mankind that all human life originated in an alien laboratory. Given the nature of the subject, the origins of humanity (and life on this planet in general) will be virtually impossible to discover without comprehensive reproducible data. Even an alien race coming to Earth and outright saying, “Humanity is a product of our genetic engineering,” would be considered dubiously. Still, it will be interesting to hear the future research of Professor Samuel Chang and his team to see what they can further discover encoded within us all.

http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/...le_14361.shtml

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...ncia_adn07.htm

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/hom.../08/01288.html

ok, i have found lots about these 'findings' on line, all mainly regurgitating the same words......but i havent found really any thing from a 'reliable' source.....so wondered what you folks think ....are we? or arnt we?
bou x

[chelmostef]

I think its very likey thats it is so. Scientist are still searching for the missing links perhaps they are looking in the wrong direction, they should look upwards no less.

But I will say that opposable thumbs has come hand in hand (no pun intended) with our physical evolution without these we could only contemplate what it would be like to build ourselves a better home.

Stef

P.S that link is a great read http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/hom.../26/01340.html

[tone3jaguar]

DNA is the same everywhere in the universe, it originates in hyperspace / higher dimensions and manifests in this reality. It is not extra terrestrial in origin, it is extra dimensional in origin. Much of the "Junk" DNA actually holds the programming of our fate in it. Then as we make new choices the DNA changes to suit them.

[chelmostef]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

DNA is the same everywhere in the universe, it originates in hyperspace / higher dimensions and manifests in this reality. It is not extra terrestrial in origin, it is extra dimensional in origin. Much of the "Junk" DNA actually holds the programming of our fate in it. Then as we make new choices the DNA changes to suit them.

I like that.

With that in mind would it be possible to predict our future from our DNA Or would that only occur once our fate has been written by our decisions? Chicken and egg I guess.

Stef

[tone3jaguar]

As soon as you look at the future you change it. The old, observer bit.

[chelmostef]

I stilll think time travel is possible. I my mind it couldn't work any other way. Take for instance a planet, one is looking at it 10 million light years away, now this planet might have nothing on it but in 10 million years it could be teaming with life. So as the observer, in esence I have been looking into the past? So with worm hole technogy one can travel faster than the speed of light? Now if observing a planet and you happen to see somthing happed from far away, it could be possible to worm hole there and change events? Would this then create a paradox? Or are timelines changeable if observed from far enough away?

Stef

[Fredkc]

In human DNA, only 97 percent is actually used in coding for anything useful. The rest of the standard human’s genetic material is called “junk DNA.”

My take?

This is typical "science speak" for "we are embarrassed to find ourselves still in the learing process". Science (here I use a capital S because it is a formal religion) loves to tout new discoveries, so long as they find them first.

When handed something new, they react in the same fashion a 4 yr old does when you hand them a Brussel sprout, or asparagus; they give it the "fish-eye" and then say something like "I don't like that!".

They'll pretend it doesn't exist.
Then marginalize it.
Then, once they've figured out how to explain it, they'll announce a "Great New Discovery".

When you think about how much faster man's learning cycles could be without all this silliness... almost makes you want to cry.

Teachers, among all the learned, should understand the benefit of living by the motto; "I live to be educated".

Fred

[giovonni]

Could be?
bou c

I use to think Nasa was a trustworthy source, but not anymore

[chelmostef]

Originally Posted by Fredkc

My take?

This is typical "science speak" for "we are embarrassed to find ourselves still in the learing process". Science (here I use a capital S because it is a formal religion) loves to tout new discoveries, so long as they find them first.

When handed something new, they react in the same fashion a 4 yr old does when you hand them a Brussel sprout, or asparagus; they give it the "fish-eye" and then say something like "I don't like that!".

They'll pretend it doesn't exist.
Then marginalize it.
Then, once they've figured out how to explain it, they'll announce a "Great New Discovery".

When you think about how much faster man's learning cycles could be without all this silliness... almost makes you want to cry.

Teachers, among all the learned, should understand the benefit of living by the motto; "I live to be educated".

Fred

I think you hit the nail right on the head there. Too many rules and to many "right" books to think any other way.

One can become ostracized for being different. The Irony of the nerds getting their own back. (im not saying all scientist are nerds of course)

stef

[Swanny]

I don't see why not, certainly not for me or anyone else to say that it's not possible

[12DnAHelix]

What is regarded as 'Junk DnA' is actually more properly referred to as 'non-coding'. There is alot of information available on the internet for perusal via a simple query such as 'Junk DnA' or 'non-coding dna'.

When Junk DnA isn't Junk.
http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html

As an aside, and based on my own personal self exploration. I would have to say that at the quantum level within our DnA there is a voluminous amount of information stored. It appears to exist inside of what I personally call 'holographic storage modules'.

This information can be accessed and perceived directly as projections upon ones internal visual field, if you use the correct internal magnifying lens.

The information does include details regarding the 'stellar ancestry of the human species'.

If you are looking for evidence that perhaps may hint at some type of 'ancient genetic engineering'.

You might want to look into 'chromosome 2 fusion', whether it was something that occurred 'naturally' or was this 'fusion' achieved via engineering ?

That's a pretty good question if you ask me.