Intuitive Dissection of the Pete Peterson Information

[iainl140285]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

I kind of new something was "fishy" when he acted as though the name of a fish with special oil in it was above top secret information. LOL

It is top secret. The 'fish oil' is already inside EVERY single person provided you havent wasted it.

It is the oil you use to 'burn the lamp' and ignite.

This info. is more secret than any flying ship they have out there.

[SWIFT]

Hi All,
I love it when people search for coverups in the PC interviews Dr Peterson seems to be a brave individual who steping outside the box. He has served his nation and has my respect for putting on that uniform for democracy. I find many people tend to forget Dr Peterson is Vietnam Veteran and deserves repect even if your don't believe in the Politics.

I wonder how many of you would put your familes in front of a firing line to speak out?

Peace & freedom
SWIFT

[tone3jaguar]

Guys, I did not think about what the answer should be or what it could be before I dowsed it. I wrote down the questions, and dowsed them up with no biased towards how the answers turned out. Is intuitive dowsing always 100% on? No. Is intuitive dowsing always more accurate then pure intuitive discernment with no tools? Yes

Remember everyone, this is my personal intuitive take on this. I have specifically give the instructions for how to do this and encouraged everyone do get their own data in the same way I have.

Hey Tone, thanks for doing the dowsing. It has been reported that the Russians did bug our embassy and bombard our employees there with EMF stuff to make them very ill. So, the question:

(FALSE) The Russians bombarded the U.S. Embassy in Moscow with Microwaves in order to disorient the occupants.

seems to be wrong or not specific enough.

Understandable, I had actually heard the same rumors years ago. However, If I ask the question about microwaves bombardment it still comes up negative. It must have been something besides microwaves. Perhaps it was some of those scalar waves they where working on for so long.

Ok TJ3 I have to tell you some thing as a machinist I have machined many types of materials and I can say this once a material has been heat treated and hardened it becomes very brittle it is stong as h*ll but depending on the hardness of it some and its shape I would have to agree with Pete what temp s do nuclear reactors run at the higher the temp the more brittle a material becomes . I have seen pcs machined and hardened that come out after cooling and you can see cracks in them and they then become paper weights so it true .

Then again in order to take some of the hardening properties out of steel you need to heat it to a certain temperature so these things are possible

I agree with you on the general properties of metal. However, I could be wrong but I think his statement was "Strong Materials become brittle" and "Weak Materials become strong". I dowsed it up using the word materials not metals. I am also framiliar with how the heat treating process can do this to metals because I am a gear head.

(FALSE) The Tibetans drill holes in their foreheads in order to unshroud the Pineal Gland.

I chuckled when I heard the above. Lobsang Rampa described this exact procedure that was done to him in his third book ("The Third Eye" if I recall correctly).

Evidently I got that one wrong.

Hi All,
I love it when people search for coverups in the PC interviews Dr Peterson seems to be a brave individual who steping outside the box. He has served his nation and has my respect for putting on that uniform for democracy. I find many people tend to forget Dr Peterson is Vietnam Veteran and deserves repect even if your don't believe in the Politics.

I wonder how many of you would put your familes in front of a firing line to speak out?

Peace & freedom
SWIFT

Getting the approval of the people you describe as bastards that you work for before releasing the material is not exactly sticking you neck out there. He held back all of the juicy stuff that he told the rest of them because he did not want to risk any adverse side effects. That is why he would not answer most of Kerry's questions.

Telling all of us that so and so that has yet to give him accurate logistical intel on economic matters is telling him that the economy is doomed is not useful. I know plenty of people that are veterans of Vietnam and also Iraq and Afganistan. If one of them walks up to me and tells me somthing that is hard to swallow I do not just buy it because once upon a time they where in the suck.

Instead of focusing on the questions that I may have gotten wrong (small percentage) lets focus on some of the questions that I may have gotten right that turned out false. These are the most ludicrous statements if you ask me.

(FALSE) A number of governments around the world are now in possession of this technology of the “Dr. Who Telephone Booth” technology.

So a number of governments have time travel technology. Really? The U.S. military industrial complex decided that it would be a good strategic idea to sell time travel technology to the rest of the world? Sorry, does not add up.

(FALSE) Wild Cats do not eat muscle tissue.

I have seen some pretty healthy wild cats at the zoo that feed on large steaks with plenty of muscle tissue on them. What is happening during those Nat Geo nature films after the wild cat catches his prey? Does the cat have David Blane like vanishing illusions and sticks the meat off camera by spitting it out when we are not looking. Ever seen a house cat catch a bird? All that is left over is feathers. Sorry, does not add up.

(FALSE) He invented and developed the worlds first Satellite tracking system privately before there where any satellites when he was 17 years old.

(FALSE) Asked to build a UFO detector when he was 14 years old

Let me see if I get this strait. When he was 14 the government asked him to build a UFO detector. Then when he was 17 he built a satellite tracking station on his own and this is why the governement took an interest in him? Which is it, did they contact him at 14 wanting the UFO detector built. Or did they contact him after he built the satellite tracking station when he was 17. And what exactly would be the difference between these two devices? Sorry, that is a total slip up by him where he messed up the chronological aspects of the fictional part of his story. Does not add up. Common sense here people!

(FALSE) Children born outside of the normal Family environment will never grow up to amount to anything special.

Bold Face lie, just ask Wayne Dyer.

(FALSE) Whales beach themselves because they are intelligent enough to know that there is not enough plankton left for all of them to eat and they are sacrificing themselves for the greater good of the ocean.

He knows this as fact because he has seen how smart whales are from working with them in government projects? That is a pretty big assumption and one filled with holes. According to recent research the quantity of minerals and microbes is going up in the oceans world wide. Sorry, does not add up.

(FALSE) As a result of us killing off all of this plankton we may run out off air on the planet earth in the near future.

Anyone can say anything. Where is the data to back this up?

[tone3jaguar]

Even if I got some of the questions wrong which is entirely possible when dowsing this quantity of material in this short of a time frame. There are still some things he stated that are bold face lies. Cats eat muscle, I am sorry but they have and always will. They actually leave behind the intestines and what not. Whales do not commit suicide because there is not enough food for their buddies. The air on earth is not going to run out and the microbial levels in the oceans are now increasing.

He held back any info in the video that would put him at risk and would not talk about it. Other than the clever marketing for his medical devices I would like for someone to point out information that he gave us that we did not already know that is actually logistically usefull.

I am tired of people claiming to have the information that we need and then comming foward with a bunch of sci-fi stories true or not that would only have usefulness to us if we where engineers at a competitive military industrial complex corporation. Tell me things I need to know or shut the f--k up.

[Northern Boy]

TJ3 I agree He didn`t really give us anything new . All the things he could have given us were talked about off the record and these things we will never be privy to. For some reason the time line has been altered by 8 to 9 years so government knew this was coming for some time and did nothing to tell any one . makes you want to vote with a bullet sometimes instead of a pencil after all its still lead in a different form

What if they had an election and some one spoke out and started asking the tough questions in a town hall like atmosphere? We know the police would try to escort him or her out of the building and the guy running gets to avoid the question. It is a way of avoiding the questions they don`t want to talk about . Why is it no one else ever stands up and says no and makes the guy answer it. We are so afraid that we may end up in jail . What about my job and my home and my toys, Wake up they will be gone soon enough

It is these actions that allows politicians to put you in the very position you and the rest of the world are facing. There has been no crime there can be no charge but we always allow it to happen . Why can`t more people stand up and say no this is wrong and bar the door make the guy answer it. what could possibly happen its supposed to be a free country you need to forget about political lines . If you haven`t guessed by now it is a class war the rich against the rest of us they are no better than you . You all know the money is worthless so all they have is more paper / ones and zeros thats it.

Its the people who make government accountable. You proved it on the Health insurance bill they were not even going to read it till you spoke up. The same thing needs to be done on Cap and Trade and Internet security they are both up for passage and if you think the fight is over then guess what it will be . By doing nothing you allow them to dictate to you and when that happens it is to late to do anything. .............. Rant over

[tone3jaguar]

I also had a problem with the way he described the "unforeseen" non-crashing of the economy back in 2001 and also now. He describes this as being caused by INERTIA? How the f--k does a term invented to explain the resistance of an object to vectors of friction have anything to do with economic science?

My logic for why this does not add up is simple. We hear all of the time how these cooperations stole the money because they could not account for it. I think the whole thing is a giant smoke screen now.

Let me see if my simple mind is seeing the truth of what actually happened. First the Federal Reserve created a digital representation of billions of dollars out of thin air. Next this digital illusion of monetary value passes through the hands of the government then the hands of financial institutions then disappears again into oblivion.

So the money appeared out of nothing, then disappeared again back into nothingness. Am I off base when I conclude that nothing actually happened other than the make believe story about a bunch of ones and zeros on a few computer databases? Was the whole thing a giant distraction? Did it actually result in the devaluation of our currency? If it did then why hasn't the dollar crashed already. Why isn't bread 30 bucks a loaf?

_________________

[Tango]

L00K Tone whatever... I understand, that "Enthusiasm is the Lub. of life."

And, I respect dowsing... But, the 'operator' must be a third party; NOT

be pre-loaded w/personal feelings... YOU corrupted your own data...

The readings would have to be IN THE BLIND to have just half a chance

at being correct... Go check w/ Yo Auntie... You CAN'T Pre-Load...

And, you don't respect mil. veterans....? Haven't you beaten 'this poor

thread enough' already......? If, we all don't follow what you say than say *** U?

Whats wrong with YOU...? You need a 'girl friend'.... Someone to give you

some attention; that you Crave. 'That's not dowsing; that's just your personal opinion. '

Let others, give their opinions... They paid their Nickel; let them use it...

Enough of YOUR SLANT. Give it a rest. " I know; I know; *** me very much..."


Tango

[Northern Boy]

TJ3 the devaluation of the dollar is out of the U.S. governments hands it is in the hands of foreign interests . China Russia And Japan control the fate of the dollar . China is already making waves about the derivative markets and not honoring their contracts. They are starting to sell off their T-Bills as well unless the government can pull a rabbit out of its hat the dollar and the economy are going to be going down like the Titanic in record time .

There are rumors Japan is going to distance itself from the U.S. as well . The new regime change are tired of the American policies being forced on them. Russia are in a much better position then the U.S. thinks as well. Its going to be sink or swim time soon and we all know it has to happen . Whether it happened in 2001 or 2010 what difference does it make . Be glad its coming and be sure that they are not allowed to restart it when they come out of their caves and holes and try to resume power

[tone3jaguar]

This is coming from an individual who thought that the best most constructive thing to say about the Steven Greer interview was that Kerry had put on to much weight. First impressions are everthing Tango.

Now all of the sudden you are an expert on intuitive information? Yes you are right that the best way to get accurate information is to dowse it blind not knowing the answers.

However, I was doing this on my own and did not have that as an option. The truth is that because most of the things he discussed in the film have almost zero impact on my life or anything a normal person needs to think about I was emotionally detached from the material until after I had done the dowsing and had a chance to analyse it from a normal point of view.

[tone3jaguar]

And another thing Tango, you seem to flip flop in your opinions and paradigms like a 90's politician. The only proof we have that you where actually military is that you posted up a youtube video of James from Top Gear riding in a U2 and then you said "Welcome to my world". Do me a favor, actually post up something relevant or go away.

[tone3jaguar]

Let others, give their opinions... They paid their Nickel; let them use it...

Enough of YOUR SLANT. Give it a rest. " I know; I know; *** me very much..."

I am not a moderator, please explain to me how posting up a thread and filling it with information in a rarely used area of the forum is owning the floor. It is not possible to stop others from voicing there opinion here unless you have administrative access. If you are trying to shift perceptions about me you are not being very intellegent about it.

[tone3jaguar]

"If people are not ****** off, then things are not changing fast enough"

(Colin Powell Shortly after he started his overhaul of the state department)

[tone3jaguar]

And just for any other "experts" out there that may be under the impression that I am not fully versed in all of the logistics of attaining information in this manner, this is a cut an paste of a response that I gave in the Manticore Forums about factors effecting dowsing accuracy. This was posted after I dowsed up the whole list of Camelot Interviewees and before the Peterson interview was published.

I must add that it is 100% impossible to get accurate results if you have any personal vested interest with ego or otherwise in the data you are trying to dowse about. The truth is that I do not really care which one of the Camelot Witnesses are accurate and which ones are not because there is almost no logistically valuable information in any of these interviews for my own personal path and development. Being able to recognize this before I did the dowsing gave me a neutral frame of mind from which to dowse the information from.

To be 100% honest, the best way to insure accuracy is blind dowsing. This was not possible here because I had already watched most of these interviews, and I was doing the work on my own. I only consciously remembered who had said what when it came to a couple of the interviewees.

Therefore, the chances of most of my dowsing data being accurate is higher than someone who has clear recolection of each interview. For example if I was Bill or Kerry attempting to dowse the accuracy of these testimonies the chances of accuracy would be much less. This is because they have a vested interest in how much of it is true or not.

A true blind dowsing of this data would be to take an experienced dowser who had never seen or been to the Camelot web page and give them the list of names and ask them to dowse for the accuracy of the testimony. This would remove 100% of the chance of the subconscious mind stepping in a squewing results.

Another way one could blind dowse would be a numbered or lettered list. In other words you would have a friend list the names of the people in a random order on a piece of paper and then put that paper face down or in some sort of covering so that you can not see it. They would either put numbers or letters (alphabetical order) on another page for you to write the dowsed data on where the names are not present, only the letters.

I guess that the only one of these testimonies that I did a blind impression on was the Pete Peterson testimony. The only people who have seen that are those present during the taping and also the editors of the vids.

For a recap, the Peterson information had dowsed up 32% total factual accuracy before I ever saw a single word of it. This was not just the content of the interview it was also everything he had disclosed to the interview team. How do you like those apples Tango

[Karen]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

I am not a moderator, please explain to me how posting up a thread and filling it with information in a rarely used area of the forum is owning the floor. It is not possible to stop others from voicing there opinion here unless you have administrative access. If you are trying to shift perceptions about me you are not being very intellegent about it.

Tone3, If you would just ignore and not respond to such irritants, they would quickly pass.

[tone3jaguar]

Passive resistance is not my style and never will be. If I am challenged I step up to the plate. Sitting in the dug out is for followers.

[iainl140285]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

And another thing Tango, you seem to flip flop in your opinions and paradigms like a 90's politician. The only proof we have that you where actually military is that you posted up a youtube video of James from Top Gear riding in a U2 and then you said "Welcome to my world". Do me a favor, actually post up something relevant or go away.

Please do a little homework before making such statements. If someone is mil. its not up to them to prove it unless they are making outlandish claims using a mil. persona.

Tango has not IMHO.
It will litteraly take 5 mins. to research.

[tone3jaguar]

Do a little homework? What you mean like google TANGO. Whatever, the truth is that the people who have a problem with me posting this stuff up are the ones that would like to live in the illusion that these "whistleblowers" are accurate. The idea of not questioning the comments that someone makes because they where in the military and deserve respect defies logic.

[iainl140285]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

Do a little homework? What you mean like google TANGO. Whatever, the truth is that the people who have a problem with me posting this stuff up are the ones that would like to live in the illusion that these "whistleblowers" are accurate. The idea of not questioning the comments that someone makes because they where in the military and deserve respect defies logic.

My apologies Tone3, I've just read my post and it comes across more confrontational than I had intended My bad.

You are absolutely right to question the 'whistleblowers'. Many of whom simple plagurise the work of others available on the net and other sources. I dont believe much of what THEY put out. It would also be nice for them to provide documentation to back their claims, in this case you picked up on his mil. status. In another thread someone picked up they would like proff of his education.

Requesting this from 'whistleblowers' IMO, is not un-reasonable at all.

Howwever, my comment was in reference to your post directed at Tango questioning his mil. history. Why? You dont ask me to prove that I work in an office. He hasn't claimed anything. He's not trying to make a name for himself. He's here to help where he can. He is doing his lifes purpose to pay it forward as it were.

You can argue his points certainly. But he will never need to prove his mil. history simply because he has claimed he has been and you would like proof.

Much respect
Iain

[tone3jaguar]

Howwever, my comment was in reference to your post directed at Tango questioning his mil. history. Why? You dont ask me to prove that I work in an office. He hasn't claimed anything. He's not trying to make a name for himself. He's here to help where he can. He is doing his lifes purpose to pay it forward as it were.

He called me out so I called him out back. Immature, maby. Impulsive, maby. Warranted, perhaps not. But when someone comes into a thread and states things like (check wit yo auntie) and (whats the matter you need a girlfriend) and has claimed to be some sort of military or ex-military who is standing up for his own then I am going to call him out.

I would like for someone, anyone to find me an ex-military person who has been in the s--t who spends any time at all typing up sensationalized mass media types of judgements. My guess is no one will never find one. When people have seen crazy ass s--t, it drives the superficial paradigms out of them.

[Sarahmay]

I, for one, really appreciated your very detailed dowsing results. Thank you for posting them!

I apologize if this has been asked before, but have you ever dowsed Anna Hayes' (Ashayana Deane) info?

[tone3jaguar]

No, I am not familiar with her stuff. I encourage people to use the instructions that I made in the other thread in this forum section and discern these things for themselves. I think it is more important that people empower themselves with the knowledge that they can get to the truth with the help of no one else.

[Anchor]

Originally Posted by Tango

If, we all don't follow what you say than *** U?

Whats wrong with YOU...? You need a 'girl friend'.... Someone to give you

some attention; that you Crave... Your, like a ' fly that doesn't go away.'

Let others, give their opinions... They paid their Nickel; let them use it...

Enough of YOUR SLANT. Give it a rest. " I know; I know; *** me very much..."


Tango

Tango,

why dont you give it a rest?

For the n'th time please dont make personal attacks.

A..

[SWIFT]

Hi Unified Serenity ,

Dr Peterson (military servicemen) has put his family at risk as any other individual when they come forward who have had a top secret ID and surley you would reaise death threats are part and parcel of that envoriment which Bill & Kerry suggested already have h..d regarding discloure of further information regarding the Dr Peterson interview.

If people are not happy with Dr Peterson interview maybe they should join a top secret military institution then try and come forward.



Peace & Freedom
SWIFT

[tone3jaguar]

If the people who would disapprove of the information had the opportunity to edit the information by way of Peterson before it was released then how is that risking anything? I do not get it, how is this guy giving the perception that he has released anything that would put him in danger other than the smoke and mirrors about not releasing the video for 2 months?

[Baron]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

If the people who would disapprove of the information had the opportunity to edit the information by way of Peterson before it was released then how is that risking anything? I do not get it, how is this guy giving the perception that he has released anything that would put him in danger other than the smoke and mirrors about not releasing the video for 2 months?

I agree this is a very sound point.What risk? Why did he not just be a whistle-blower anonymously and tell the whole story instead of part, of a non story out in the open?

Once gain though I giving him the benefit of the doubt for now and wait for some solid information based on provable or replicative evidence.

Regards
Baron