|
|
Free Energy Free Energy devices and information |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 29
|
![]()
My personal opinion is that this Flying Pyramid guy is full of ****. I hope I'm wrong.
Cheers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 45
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 29
|
![]() Quote:
If indeed I am wrong, I will admit it with all my heart when F_P comes forth with the first in the world unipole magnet shaped like whatever. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 84
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Waking.Up;231007]Just read the thread. Flying pyramid is saying that you need a unipole magnet to run this only true free energy design. Well, doooh, if there were in existance unipole magnets, perpetual motion devices would be fairly easy to build. Hence, his design is not the only one that is the true design, because in the world of unipole magnets, you could design number of devices, and all would work on the same principle. The problem is with the unipole magnet.. Not some notches on the spheres or the size and design of the pyramid.
What is a unipole magnet? Unipole Or Unidirectional Magnets are strongly recommended for therapeutic usage. These magnets are a flat surface type with the Positive pole on one flat side, and the Negative pole on the opposite flat surface. The Positive side is usually marked with a red color. The Negative is usually indicated by a GREEN colored-coded sticker. The green NEGATIVE side is always the side placed toward the body. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Magnets always have 2 poles. What is refered to a unipole magnet is simply one that has a very strong pole and a very weak one. So its like the stronger pole cancels out any effect of the weaker pole.
Calling it a unipole is misleading as it still has 2 poles. That being said, I have followed this thread since the begining. I am still baffled at why FP would "play" for so long. We don't have the leisure to play anymore. If this thing is real, now is the time to get it out, if not, then lets move on. Sofar, I have lost maybe the equivilent of 5 hours on this, I will never get them back and it will be very frustrating if thing is bogus! So FP, one cannot say we are being impatient and rude to you, it has been one friggin year now! Either put up or move on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 29
|
![]()
Is it possible for a one solid whole object that in fact is a magnet to have one pole that is weaker than the other? e.g. If you have, I dunno, a cube that is a permanent neodymium magnet - how is it possible to reduce one poles strenght?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
![]()
I recommend a great book if you want to know more about the power of magnets, including healing and magnetizing water. It was originally written in Dutch but has been translated in several languages.
Its called "Genezen met Magneten" by Uitgeverij, publisher is Deventer Holland. Here is is at Amazon, french version: http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5183EJ5ZF4L._SL500_AA240_.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.amazon.fr/Magn%25C3%25A9toth%25C3%25A9rapie-aimants-gu%25C3%25A9rissent-Kumar-Mehta/dp/2890742296&usg=__Fxer1kZ63ia50NoJ5xtzEirNYMc=&h=24 0&w=240&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=0ei2MurJWYL VkM:&tbnh=110&tbnw=110&prev=/images%3Fq%3DMagnetotherapie%2Bles%2Baimants%2Bqui %2Bguerissent%2Benglish%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfiref ox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US ![]() So as for your question, the shape of a magnet plays on the intensity of the poles. A thicker magnet will have stronger poles. The magnetic effect is always omnidirectional but the intensity is always stronger at the tip of the magnet. As for a magnetized "ball", it would be interesting to see how it reacts. For sure, all magnets are self adjusting, so to change the behaviour of one, I guess you have to play with the shape and see how it reacts. A cube in my opinion, would have 2 stronger poles and the 2 other sides on the same plane would be weaker. Again, it self adjusts. I have never seen a magnet with more than 2 strong poles. Cheers Last edited by Olam; 01-31-2010 at 12:01 PM. Reason: Edited name |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 45
|
![]() Quote:
Marko Rodin Permanent Monopole Magent (biased Poles) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnjW1zROJPc The Jeff Cook Effect http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMm70qQ5Jms Jeff Cook Effect - Wizard Wand http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNEGBelLZNY Love, peace and understanding together with free energy for ALL, would make my day! ![]() Sollve |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London South East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
just a quick one.
The bloke in that video about Giants describes an artifact. A cup that sounds very much like a unipole magnet. Here, Klaus Dona http://projectcamelot.org/klaus_dona.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|