The Reptilian Agenda - Activities On Earth

[TRANCOSO]

I just read chapter 1 & 2 of 'Defending Sacred Ground' by Alex Collier.
None of the predictions the Andromedanians fed him came true.
Makes you wonder from where/whom these 'benevolent' Andromedanians get their intel.

[orthodoxymoron]

Originally Posted by TRANCOSO

I just read chapter 1 & 2 of 'Defending Sacred Ground' by Alex Collier.
None of the predictions the Andromedanians fed him came true.
Makes you wonder from where/whom these 'benevolent' Andromedanians get their intel.

I think everything is suspect. I like Alex Collier...but I am leaning toward the idea that the info was remotely viewed, channeled, researched, insider-assisted...rather than Alex living on an Andromedan spaceship for long periods. I could be wrong...but that's what I think. I still get more out of listening to Alex than I do listening to nearly everyone else.

Are there any pictures of Reptilians? I've seen pictures of purported Greys and Hybrids...but no Reptilians. All I have seen is drawings. Has anyone heard of a Reptilian Autopsy? The non-physical aspect of these beings troubles me. Do they find Reptilian bodies in crashed UFO's? Are they really mostly demonic beings? I'd love to be friends...but I don't want to get slimed or possessed! Also...do we really have hard evidence that there are thousands of kidnapped children being eaten by Reptilians? Wouldn't it be much less discoverable for the Reps to raise them inside the earth...rather than tasking humans with kidnapping them? I'm very suspicious of both the good and bad aspects of the UFO/Alien phenomenon. I don't know who to trust or believe...so I pretty much doubt everyone...including some of my favorite speakers and writers. I mostly ask questions...and try to formulate possible realities and scenarios.

Namaste

[Seafury]

Originally Posted by TRANCOSO

I just read chapter 1 & 2 of 'Defending Sacred Ground' by Alex Collier.
None of the predictions the Andromedanians fed him came true.
Makes you wonder from where/whom these 'benevolent' Andromedanians get their intel.

Thats when I stopped reading too. I even like Alex Collier, but it's pretty hard to want to go any farther when you read stuff like that.

He's come out more recently and stated that timelines change, things change, those were probabilities etc, but guess what? That's what everyone says who predicts something that doesn't happen. If you know that, why would you not only make those predictions, but make them so definitively?

As soon as you start making definitive predictions, you're asking for trouble and ruining any good information you may have to put out because it's intertwined with disinfo.

Yes, information predicting things that don't happen is disinfo. It's not a warning of a possibility, it's a prediction.....that ...was...false.

[trainedobserver]

Originally Posted by TRANCOSO

I just read chapter 1 & 2 of 'Defending Sacred Ground' by Alex Collier.
None of the predictions the Andromedanians fed him came true.
Makes you wonder from where/whom these 'benevolent' Andromedanians get their intel.

What are the possibilities here?

1. There was no one from Andromeda talking to Collier.

• Collier is lying
• Collier was hallucinating
  

2. Collier was targeted and feed disinformation by someone for reasons unknown.
3. Andromedains (or whoever they really are) lied for reasons unknown.

Of the three possibilities (there are others I imagine) which seems the most likely scenario?

Collier seems like a nice guy. That of course is immaterial. Many pathological liars and or con-men are very likable and nice guys (example: politicians). I've met several in my life as I'm sure you have.

This brings up the question: Have any contactee 'predictions' ever proven accurate? Information provided by contactee's such Adamski for example are notoriously inaccurate and improbable.

[Seafury]

Most definitive predictions I've come across, especially with PC in 2008, have all turned out to be false. Not a single one came true.

There are a couple of ways to look at it in my opinion.

1) People making predictions have gotten excited and are off-balance. Take what you can from their information and throw their predictions away, they're garbage.

2) Predictions are merely probabilities of what may happen. Things change all the time, wipe your brow with relief that what they predicted didn't happen and move on. I personally detest this point because it means we're all free to say whatever the heck we want and then when it doesn't come true say, whew!! Keep listening folks, soon I'll feed you some more BS and then take credit when it doesn't happen because I filled you in so we all narrowly avoided it. Please.

Well I think you know which point I'm behind. One thing's for sure, it really discredit's the Andromedans as far as being advanced evolved beings if they're taking point number 2 in my opinion. They can't interfere with us because of free will...but....they can feed us predictions (probabilities we find out later) and then when they don't happen it's because we all took note and changed our timeline? Well....wouldn't that in itself be a violation of our free will? Subtle yes, but where do you draw the line? At what point is any interaction with a human not a violation of free will? You affected us. We've been affected. You were an affect. The End.

[TRANCOSO]

Originally Posted by trainedobserver

What are the possibilities here?

1. There was no one from Andromeda talking to Collier.

• Collier is lying
• Collier was hallucinating
  

2. Collier was targeted and feed disinformation by someone for reasons unknown.
3. Andromedains (or whoever they really are) lied for reasons unknown.

Of the three possibilities (there are others I imagine) which seems the most likely scenario?

Collier seems like a nice guy. That of course is immaterial. Many pathological liars and or con-men are very likable and nice guys (example: politicians). I've met several in my life as I'm sure you have.

This brings up the question: Have any contactee 'predictions' ever proven accurate? Information provided by contactee's such Adamski for example are notoriously inaccurate and improbable.

You only have a good name once. You can never trust somebody again for the full 100%, once they've been caught lying.