John Lear

[Love/Light 13]

when you say there is no NWO, do you mean that you do not believe the Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate exists? Or do you just mean that an actual New World Order organization does not exist?

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by Love/Light 13

when you say there is no NWO, do you mean that you do not believe the Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate exists? Or do you just mean that an actual New World Order organization does not exist?

That an actual NWO organization does not exist.

The Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate use the NWO as their whipping boy.

[King Lear]

Originally Posted by johnlear

That an actual NWO organization does not exist.

The Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate use the NWO as their whipping boy.

So, the The Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate is a loose independant "NWO" - sharing the same aspiration but aren't interacting, in your opinion?


Like Al Quaida shall do. (independant cells)
And also Russian Oligarchs and Mafia Clans do.

[CONDE]

OHHHHH Nooooooooooo!

king liar is here.... * cue funeral march *

The mood is ruined !

Go Away ! you fake cardboard crown, nit picking, silly question asker,
time waster, party puuper, Jimmy Carter looking ARSH LO...

Ha ha "just joking" ...

[King Lear]

Originally Posted by CONDE

OHHHHH Nooooooooooo!

king liar is here.... * cue funeral march *

The mood is ruined !

Go Away ! you fake cardboard crown, nit picking, silly question asker,
time waster, party puuper, Jimmy Carter looking ARSH LO...

Ha ha "just joking" ...

conde you're sooooo kind...

[CONDE]

Maybe, but in the fake competition you are KING !

[GoingToFast]

Originally Posted by johnlear

That an actual NWO organization does not exist.

The Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate use the NWO as their whipping boy.

You may have a point on this one John.

[MOD EDIT]
Conde..

King..

Play nice!

[CONDE]

Yes Musado, sorry.

UR quick !

[eagle]

GoingToFast:

Why do all the videos of the WTC crashes conflict on trajectory and velocity?

Why will the film makers (lucky guys) never talk about their films and where some were even filmed?

Video fakes are child's play.

I hope this is not your only hypothesis.

The hologram is not even neccessary since no one saw it. If they did, they're liars, since it was moving 500mph (according to the videos - lol).

Now figure out how a airliner can go 500mph and hit anything, UNLESS it was remote controlled.

Google "Home Run" aircraft

[Kate]

Originally Posted by johnlear

That an actual NWO organization does not exist.

The Illuminati/Jesuit Order/Rothschild Banking conglomerate use the NWO as their whipping boy.

I 100% agree... we have to get our heads realigned with what NWO is...

from what i understand, it is definately a mix of hundreds of 'secret organisations( FREEMASON BASED) /religious orders/ multi nationals who are the big players in the GAME'

NEW WORLD ORDER is a 'tag' which is convenient for the PTB to wrap their agendas around!!
I am totally loving the posts and information spilling out of this thread! keep going folks...great stuff!

live laugh love learn
fire

[Mike_Jetson]

John a couple questions if you will let me. I thought when I saw your Camelot interview and OMF posts but just remembered. If the holograms were used, then surely there would be no need for video fakery?. One point that made me consider the holograms more, was that when the second plane hits, you see barely any wreckage start to fall to the ground. Its like the entire plane goes fully into the building and disapears so unlike a lot, i wont rule it out. Im still on the fence side where remote control smaller planes are used though

In relation to the van allen belt, are you saying we have no bases on the moon or mars?

also, I wish you were serious about the tin hats, I think I need to make one for my facebook profile

OMG! About three pages back I was just trolling along reading all the 'hope he shows up on this site' posts and the next one I read popped up the cutest picture of himself in a birthday hat!! I was so tickled!! I respect and love reading anyone's works that takes me to new area's of awareness and being the curious Leo that I am, I hate not knowing the truth of just about ANYTHING so I'm still in the "Sponge" stage...so thank you so much John for being so generous in sharing your research ...

OK, I hope my little crush doesn't seem tooo gushy! I also want to thank you for posting the piece about the new area 51. I just finished reading the Millenium Hospitality series by Charles Hall and my first thought when I saw that post was if the 'tall whites' have moved to the new nevada digs or are still at Nellis...?

Also, just for funzies, would I still be in Integrity if I didn't vote in this election? (for the first time in my life)

thank you for being so accessable for us here John

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by Mike_Jetson

John a couple questions if you will let me. I thought when I saw your Camelot interview and OMF posts but just remembered. If the holograms were used, then surely there would be no need for video fakery?.

The jury is still out. Everyone of the videos were faked. Most witnesses saw no planes. Was Flight 11 a hologram and 175 video fakery? Was each a little of both?

One point that made me consider the holograms more, was that when the second plane hits, you see barely any wreckage start to fall to the ground. Its like the entire plane goes fully into the building and disapears so unlike a lot, i wont rule it out.

All I am saying is that between all four airplanes there should be at least one or two of the 9.6 million serialized and documented parts with associated part numbers that we can identify. Between the 4 airplanes there was approximately 300 miles of wiring, every 6 inches of which is stamped with a long part number telling were it is coming from, where it is going to and its rating. All I want is 6 inches with that number. I mean the 300 miles of wiring had to go somewhere. It can't all have burned up.

Im still on the fence side where remote control smaller planes are used though

Nope. No remote control planes. Too risky.

In relation to the van allen belt, are you saying we have no bases on the moon or mars?

I no longer believe we have any bases on the moon or Mars. But let me caution you. I have been wrong before.

also, I wish you were serious about the tin hats, I think I need to make one for my facebook profile

Price: $20 includes shipping and handling and an autograph.

[Zenbuoy]

"Nope. No remote control planes. Too risky."


Good Sir.

What might you think of this video @ 1:08 showing a white dot possibly guiding the plane image?


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgDjYSE0pDU


thanks

[eagle]

Originally Posted by Zenbuoy

"Nope. No remote control planes. Too risky."


Good Sir.

What might you think of this video @ 1:08 showing a white dot possibly guiding the plane image?


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgDjYSE0pDU


thanks

Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack Aircraft
http://www.geocities.com/mknemesis/printer.html


Still, the cruise missile is remote controlled and highly accurate for decades. Somehow an empty "home run" can't?

Remote is a definite possibility. I still lean toward the missile, but whichever.

If remote, WHERE ARE THE PARTS!

Any parts found do not match the official story, so it is suppressed (missile parts).

This makes me lean to missile and no plane.

The pentagon incident looks like a drone to me.

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by Zenbuoy

"Nope. No remote control planes. Too risky."


Good Sir.

What might you think of this video @ 1:08 showing a white dot possibly guiding the plane image?


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgDjYSE0pDU


thanks

If a video purporting to have been taken on 911 contains an airplane crashing into the WTC, that video has been faked or has imaged a holograph.

The purpose of these fake videos is to reinforce public perception that there was in fact airplanes crashing into the WTC.

These videos were fabricated using red dots, white dots, airplanes diving, airplanes turning, airplanes going straight, airplanes looking like drones every possible scenario to keep the perception going that 'something' crashed into the WTC.

When in fact nothing...nothing crashed into the WTC. It was video fakery and Tom Foolery.

What created the Wile E. Coyote cartoon cutouts in the sides of the WTC were sophisticated beam weapons. What destroyed the WTC towers were orbiting space based weapons using molecular disassociation technology.

Just ask yourself this question: Why, in 7 years, has not one building been erected on ground zero? And why, of those that have been partially erected been immediately torn down?

[King Lear]

Originally Posted by johnlear

Nope. No remote control planes. Too risky.

What about the 4 "Doomsday"planes?


Andreas Hauß alludes that these flying command centrals could be able to remote control the planes. And one was filmed very near to the twin towers.

[eagle]

Originally Posted by King Lear

What about the 4 "Doomsday"planes?


Andreas Hauß alludes that these flying command centrals could be able to remote control the planes. And one was filmed very near to the twin towers.

Butting in!

Where are the PARTS? Anything? even as small as my arm...?

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by King Lear

What about the 4 "Doomsday"planes?


Andreas Hauß alludes that these flying command centrals could be able to remote control the planes. And one was filmed very near to the twin towers.

I have only seen a video of one E4-B. There was no remote control. There was no remote control airplanes. There were no remote control drones. There were no remote control airliners. There were no remote control hijackers. There was no remote control A-3. There was no remote control Boeing 737. No remote control extraterrestrial spaceship. No remote control aliens. No remote control nothing. Forget remote control.

Remote control is a cop out, a fantasy, a crutch for those who simply cannot admit that we were all hoaxed by video fakery.

You all run around in circles bumping into each other with wild claims about remote control, black ops hijackers, autopilots that takeover from the pilot and land somewhere, missiles and airliners exploding over the Atlantic.

You were hoaxed by video fakery. Get over it!

[GoingToFast]

"The D-21 drone was a single engine ramjet for reconnaisance. After that accident it was mounted on B-52's. I believe that there were many successful missions over China."

How did they get the engines running on the "drone" when it was mounted on the B-52, as you can see below it had to go over M 3 to fire up, it had to be one hell of a B-52.

"No, it is not a coincidence. First of all it wasn't an SR-71 Blackbird, it was an A-12 modified with a back seat for the launch coordinater who was Ray Torick. Second of all they had to get the D-21 going over M 3 just to get the engine started and the A-12 was all they had. No coincidence there."

The SR-71 and the A-12 practicly are the same vehicle, get a grip man.

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by GoingToFast

"The D-21 drone was a single engine ramjet for reconnaisance. After that accident it was mounted on B-52's. I believe that there were many successful missions over China."

How did they get the engines running on the "drone" when it was mounted on the B-52, as you can see below it had to go over M 3 to fire up, it had to be one hell of a B-52.

I wasn't there but there were obviously modifications. It is unlikely that they got 'one hell of a' B-52 up to Mach 3. You need to get a grip.

"No, it is not a coincidence. First of all it wasn't an SR-71 Blackbird, it was an A-12 modified with a back seat for the launch coordinater who was Ray Torick. Second of all they had to get the D-21 going over M 3 just to get the engine started and the A-12 was all they had. No coincidence there."

The SR-71 and the A-12 practicly are the same vehicle, get a grip man.

What does 'practically' mean? The A-12 was shorter, did not have chines, was a single seater, went faster and higher and there were several other changes.

But it was black. Maybe thats what you mean?

[GoingToFast]

Originally Posted by johnlear

I wasn't there but there were obviously modifications. It is unlikely that they got 'one hell of a' B-52 up to Mach 3. You need to get a grip.



What does 'practically' mean? The A-12 was shorter, did not have chines, was a single seater, went faster and higher and there were several other changes.

But it was black. Maybe thats what you mean?

Have to go to sleep now, got to get up early in the morning.
What ever you think of our little conversation here, I realy like you John, you are one hell of a guy. Sweat dreams to you all.

[Ashatav]

Exelent having you here Mr Lear.

Congratulations for all the work you have being doing during these years!








PD: all have to look at this wingmaker material from Dr Neruda interview!

Lets see:

Sarah: "This is what George Bush used to call the New World order isn't it? (!!)
Dr. Neruda: "Yes, but there have been four other presidents who've acknowledged this concept."
(!!!)
Sarah: "What would make the world's people decide to unify under one governing body, or for that matter, create a global culture--whatever that means? I just can't envision it happening--not in my lifetime." (!!!!)
Dr. Neruda: "According to the WingMakers it will happen through the digital economy and then through the Internet's OLIN technology platform. And through this global network, entertainment and educational content will be globalized. This is the basis of a global culture with unified commerce, content, and communities. Once these pieces of the infrastructure are in place, then the need to govern this infrastructure will loom as the preeminent issue of the day. And the United Nations is the logical ruling body for such an endeavor. (!!!!!) As long as the World's people allow the digitization of the economy and embrace the OLIN technology platform, a global government and culture is virtually assured to emerge."

what?!

[johnlear]

Originally Posted by GoingToFast

Have to go to sleep now, got to get up early in the morning.
What ever you think of our little conversation here, I realy like you John, you are one hell of a guy. Sweat dreams to you all.

Thanks. You may not be aware but when the bluesuiters took over in 1967 there was a lot of ill will. Roadrunners might take considerable offense at someone calling their A-12 an SR-71.