SNOW CIRCLES ...instead of CROP CIRCLES

[mntruthseeker]

my remark about 666 is just as it is................to me its just a number and what ever reason you decide to add it is fine with me.............


Maybe seeing as you showed up, you would like to explain to us how you think the "snow circle" happened to be done. Is it fake snow and wheat sprayed white ahead of time or what ?

I can't imagine snow not melting and regardless of anything you may say, I believe that at least 20 % of crop circles are not done by anyone here or do you think we are alone on this planet ?

I dont take to swearing as its just not part of me.

[truthseekers]

Originally Posted by mntruthseeker

my remark about 666 is just as it is................to me its just a number and what ever reason you decide to add it is fine with me.............


Maybe seeing as you showed up, you would like to explain to us how you think the "snow circle" happened to be done. Is it fake snow and wheat sprayed white ahead of time or what ?

I can't imagine snow not melting and regardless of anything you may say, I believe that at least 20 % of crop circles are not done by anyone here or do you think we are alone on this planet ?

.

To state that you will not be interested in any possibilities I give means you are playing the same game many crop circles researchers play which is that no matter how much evidence is given to them they will defy it and go against it. I dont go with this sort of position.

No i dont think it is wheap sprayed white. Its interesting that you use the 20% argument which is basically you picking up and repeating the statements of crop circle researchers. the latest figures from this years say more like 5% may be real. What next year... none are real. I think it just comes down to the quality of the researh which has been helped along by circlemakers such as ourselves helping teh researchers to see the facts.

Originally Posted by trainedobserver

No. Let's think about it this way. Say you have a car. Do you take it to a mechanic who is schooled in automotive mechanics, who will examine the evidence, make conclusions based on the evidence, and then make the appropriate repairs? Or do you take it to a man who meditates on what might be the cars problem and based on how he feels at the moment may or may not replace some part in the car for no real mechanical reason?

The "scientific method" is what we are talking about vs. what exactly?

The Internet, the method by which we are communicating, the myriad machines that make it up, was designed and is maintained through science and not through meditation, looking within, or revealed knowledge, nor could it ever be.

The evidence that Crop Circles are created by human beings through the use of rather prosaic mechanical methods is there for all to see. Some of the makers are more than willing to tell and explain all about it, but you have to have an open mind and the willingness to examine the evidence without bias.

The reluctance to let go of the paranormal explanation for something by people who claim to be on some sort of spiritual journey to the truth is incredibly disconcerting but not surprising to me for the simple reason I did the same thing for many years. I understand where you are coming from after a fashion. However, at some point the passion for the truth must overtake any pet theories or ideas that we might have or it isn't a pursuit of truth at all. This can very difficult, depending on the subject, or at least it was for me.

As I've said before, believe what you will, but at least look at all of the evidence available and revise your conclusions as necessary. For your sake.

VIDEOS
Testing of Crop Circles
How to work out a crop circle is man made
The science and "experts" exposed
Crop Circles being made

I am glad some people like yourself have the skills to spot that circles are man made. To many it's too much of a shattering prospect to realise that circles arent made by aliens directly. However some of the experiences that both circlemakers have had and people visiting the circles are enough to say that there is something unusual going on even though people make the circles. I have been driven/guided to go out and make a design that a group were meditating on. I did the exact shape they were asking for.

There is a heap load of arrogance and denial about human circlemaking. I find it hard to know if it is due to researchers wanting to keep face, make some money or gain some power over followers of their theories or if it because they just are not bright enough to get the truth. I know **for certain** I have seen time after time researchers who will all out lie their butts off when they know full well a circle has been created with the farmer been paid for a experiment/demonstration or wedding ceremony or all manner of reasons, they will then tell their followers there is no evidence the circle was man made. Now stand where I am standing and tell me you would cry a big FOUL if you had seen these researchers do this. How could you ever take them seriously again if you knew that???

This is literally what I am up against. Its not about being truly right, it seems to them it is about being seen to be right, even if your wrong. This is a lot for many people who are genuinely interested in these subejcts to take on board. They naturally want to fall back behind the trench lines of belief in circles. The wish not to underme the core beliefs they have held for years means that is often easier for people to believe that circlemakers are the liars and go back to untested researchers positions rather than face that many (yes manY) researchers either dont know whats going on, or do know exactly whats going on and arent saying! The reasoning for positions held on crop circles are usually because of what you saw on tv or read in a book or heard in a lecture. Very few people actually properly research circles and fewer still bother to speak to circlemakers or listen t teh things we are saying. So people gain their beliefs based on third hand information, not well established facts gained first hand.

There are even videos now being released where in order to win favour from eager belivers the researchers are resorting to efforts to say that we are government agents. I just cant believe this. I even had Linda Moulton Howe say that I worked for the CIA. How come I work for the CIA when I'm British? Sheesh! Wheres the proof? Well the simple answer is there is no proof, these are just hunches and opinions from researchers who are angry as hell that we are bit by bit taking away their believers and making them look silly. However I must stress that before my recent youtube education campaign we had tried in vain for many years to work with researchers who were prepared to speak to us to help them understand the truth of how circles were made by people. Most wouldnt even speak to us, behaving in very agressive or offhand manner. Had they worked with us and seen the truth 9 years ago I would not be so determined now with my youtube channel and lectures to present the truth to a wider audience. Its their problem if they couldnt move with the times.

Its like someone who has one of those suitcase mobile phones - its old school... it doesnt work on todays networks... its not sophisticated and you missed the boat. Smart kiddies can grasp much easier than older folks new information and its the older folks who have a much harder time seeing the facts.

One of the most couragous researchers to tell the truth is Colin Andrews, who said he felt most circles were man made. That took a lot of guts and honesty to do that. However look what happened to him. He was then cut off from the research community. His lectures were cancelled and he isnt welcome to speak in many groups now. This is how the information is controlled folks and it isnt a conspiracy by MI5 or the CIA... its the people who organise these conferences and their customers who want to control the flow of information so it spins the way they like it. Bear this in mind. It is a fact!

[QUOTE=trainedobserver;206980]

Originally Posted by truthseekers

Wow! A real whistle blower with tons of experience and video evidence. Now that would make a great Project Camelot interview don't you think Mr. Ryan?

I am happy to do an interview with anyone... who is Mr Ryan?

[trainedobserver]

Originally Posted by truthseekers

T
I am glad some people like yourself have the skills to spot that circles are man made.

Thanks. Your efforts in educating the public on the truth of crop circles are largely responsible. I appreciate the honest work you are doing. Please keep it up. Please produce a DVD or two with your videos on them. And please do make another Crop Circle documentary that brings things us up to date on the scene as it is today.

Originally Posted by truthseekers

... This is how the information is controlled folks and it isnt a conspiracy by MI5 or the CIA... its the people who organise these conferences and their customers who want to control the flow of information so it spins the way they like it. Bear this in mind. It is a fact!

It's like scales dropping of your eyes when you realize what is actually going on isn't it? To realize that the disinformation effort is largely a symptom of the UFO/paranormal community ITSELF and not the work of some shadowy outside agency is disheartening isn't it? While it is a documented fact beyond all denial that government and military agencies have monitored, infiltrated, and controlled many UFO study groups since the early 50s, not all "disinformation" comes from them. Unscrupulous researchers, con-men, and well meaning but naive true believers have been doing a great job on their own.

Originally Posted by trainedobserver

I am happy to do an interview with anyone... who is Mr Ryan?

I was referring to Project Camelot's Bill Ryan. Since Project Camelot prides itself on controversial subjects an interview with you should be exactly what they are looking for ... one would think anyway. What about it Bill or Kerry?