Barry King British Whistleblower testimony

Operator · 10-13-2008, 03:25 PM

Hi Steve,

No harm done ... that's why I came in with: "please be careful".

I know what you mean ... it's very difficult to discern the truth between all the pieces ...
I want to raise an interesting question: What would be better ?

1. All evidence supporting each other
2. Some evidence in conflict with other evidence

In case 1 someone can easily fall for a hoax nothing is contradicting, it must be true.

Case 2 however makes it more interesting. Because the contradictions it will make you more sharp. Someone must NOT be telling
the truth ... and why ?

The why question most of the times is the best lead ......

Cheers

10-13-2008, 03:25 PM	#11
Operator Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Caribbean Posts: 375	Re: Barry King British Whistleblower testimony Hi Steve, No harm done ... that's why I came in with: "please be careful". I know what you mean ... it's very difficult to discern the truth between all the pieces ... I want to raise an interesting question: What would be better ? 1. All evidence supporting each other 2. Some evidence in conflict with other evidence In case 1 someone can easily fall for a hoax nothing is contradicting, it must be true. Case 2 however makes it more interesting. Because the contradictions it will make you more sharp. Someone must NOT be telling the truth ... and why ? The why question most of the times is the best lead ...... Cheers