Future Events

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Chinacat]

Hello and thank you for the messages. Can you explain this statement?

The dire events of 20 June 2008


I am not sure what you are referencing.

[RubyTuesday]

Originally Posted by Chinacat

Hello and thank you for the messages. Can you explain this statement?

The dire events of 20 June 2008


I am not sure what you are referencing.

The Georgia/Russia conflict. It's not over at all, just the beginning it seems.

[Merkhava]

.

[Chinacat]

Originally Posted by Merkhava

The USA and Russia were at the brink of nuclear war on 20 June 2008.

http://www.stevequayle.com/News.aler...ussia.war.html

With all due respect to the posters here, Steve Quayle is un reliable based on previous misinformation from him. He has shown me he exagerates and often makes stuff up to fill air time. I believe there might have been an incident on 20 June, but if Quayle says he saw a missle launch and exoctic craft, I would wager that is his need for attention getting in the way of something that might be the truth. Namely that there was an incident on 20 june.

So please do not think I am doubting of the whole report. Just whatever quaytle says, not the easily verified radio traffic.

[Merkhava]

.

[Chinacat]

Originally Posted by Merkhava

Agreed. There are particular details of that report that beg credibility. Those fringe details are not anything I would advocate or defend.

I think the important point should not be lost by all the clutter of disinformation and exaggerations, and that is this:

There was unusual activity on 20 June 2008 involving the nuclear forces of the USA and Russia.

The current breakdown in US-Russian relations and the overt display of Russian conventional military capbability in response to western expansion deep into the Russian spheres of influence is consistent with a major change of policy in Moscow to oppose the unipolar paradigm of the US being "the sole world super power."

The US has overplayed its hand and the Russians made it clear they have had enough.

The rise of the Shanghai Cooperation Council as an eastern alliance to counter balance the West is altering the geopolitical lanscape and making old assumptions irrelevant.

Russia and China have reminded the US they possess nuclear weapons and that they will not standby idly if the US attacks Iran.

Yes, good read. I think a faction in the US is trying to pick a fight to help McCain and Israel. I also think Wall street needs a war to distract from their on going collapse.

[Merkhava]

.

[Andre]

Originally Posted by Merkhava

The cancellation of 2008 Presidential Election

Never since the crisis of the American Civil War has the potential existed for the unprecedented cancellation of the Presidential election in the USA. There are a number of reasons for this:

1) The threat of a WMD attack to influence the outcome of an election is ever present. It happened in Madrid, Spain just prior to the Spanish election, resulting in the removal of a strong supporter of the Bush Administration. Soon afterwards, all Spanish troops in Iraq were withdrawn. It is very conceivable, in the event of another 911 type of attack prior to the US election, that Bush/Cheney would implement the COG, indefinitely “postpone” the election and suspend the Congress and US Supreme Court from convening out of concern “for the individual safety” of members of the Legislative and Judicial branches of government.


2) Members of the 911 Congressional Commission charge that little has been done since 2001 to protect the nation against a WMD attack involving nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080909/...tdIRkV9NkazJV4

"The threat of a new, major terrorist attack on the United States is still very real," says the report to be released Wednesday, the same day a congressional commission will hold a hearing in New York on nuclear and biological terrorism threats.

"A nuclear, chemical or biological weapon in the hands of terrorists remains the single greatest threat to our nation," the report said. "While progress has been made in securing these weapons and materials, we are still dangerously vulnerable."

Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, had harsher criticism of the Bush administration's efforts. Their report, written by the staffs of the House Homeland Security and Foreign Affairs committees, found little or no progress across the board on national security initiatives.

"The Bush administration has not delivered on a myriad of critical homeland and national security mandates," said the Democrats' report that was released Tuesday.

"The administration has just failed to act in so many ways," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. "Let's say that we've been fortunate that we have not been attacked" since 2001, said Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.


3) There is a tenacious impeachment movement in the US that is growing in grassroots support. This movement places many powerful individuals in the Bush Administration in personal jeopardy of not only being removed from office, but also being subjected to criminal prosecutions.

http://www.pubrecord.org/politics/31...inst-bush.html

Kucinich has collected 150,000 signatures, 100,000 of which have already been filed. On Wednesday, the day before 9/11, about 50,000 additional signatures will be filed with the Speaker through the Clerk of the House. Kucinich's office said the effort is ongoing.

Wednesday's news conference is entitled “The day before the world changed, a day to change the world!” It will focus on Kucinich's ongoing efforts to hold impeachment hearings against Bush.


4) Statements have been made by the Democratic Presidential candidates that investigations could happen to investigate potential capital crimes committed by Bush Administration officials while in office.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-13967420.html

Democratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden has said that that he and running mate Barack Obama could pursue criminal charges against the Bush administration if elected to the White House this November.

Biden said that an Obama-led government would go through Bush administration data with “a fine-toothed comb” and pursue charges if necessary.

-------------------------------------------------------

The motivations now exist to influence the Bush Administration to seek cancellation of the 2008 Presidential election in order to shield themselves from war crime prosecutions, remain indefinitely in office and continue their “War on Terror” global agenda. What is missing is the overwhelming justification to the American people.

If there is a WMD attack on one or several American cities, the pretext will exist to declare martial law and establish a de facto Bush/Cheney executive dictatorship.

These are good points. But we must not lose sight of the fact that the Republicans and Democrats are pawns in the chess game. This idea of Obama/Biden impeaching Bush/Cheney and the constant to and fro between each sides is just manipulation that is carried by the mainstream media.

We need to see through that.

Whether or not there is an election or whoever takes control of the White House in January, the true earthly powers will always reside with the Papacy and the Jesuits and/or the Illuminati.

[Anti-Ignorance]

Good stuff, keep it coming!! I've seen all of this from other sources, but this is put together nicely.

I think an important thing for people to know, is that it's useless debating who will win a war between US and Russia or China, because wars are not about "winning". They are financed, coordinated, and instigated at the highest levels. The US is planned to lose this war, as the entire collapse of the American Empire is planned. It just seems as if the neocons are having a little trouble lately trying to get another country to fall into their trap... but they have many tricks up their sleeves...

Now just because something is planned, doesn't neccesarily mean they will succeed...

Once again, thank you for this great information!

[fawziya]

?

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Rocky_Shorz]

and don't forget, Turkey, one of the Strongest NATO militaryforces in the region will also stand with Iran, thanks to their new Islamic Government...

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.

[Carol]

Hmmm, it's interesting to note just how much posturing is done by various countries as a means to let the other side know what "could" be at stake. Years ago, when the Berlin wall came down and the cold war ended, Russia had the opportunity to get back on its financial feet and with the help of US businesses to boot. Russia can now financially wipe out the US so why would one worry about nukes? By now, many know that 9/11, which is instigated by the Cheney cartel and was based upon taking out the US economy so as to redirect the US toward a one-world-government that Pappy Bush started back in the days when he was around JFK and likely had something to do with JFK's demise.

The military are chess pawns. All one has to do is watch deployment to get an idea of the next psychological move against other PTB in the world today. Most of this is just posturing with no real threat (in actual terms of nukes being fired) in the offing. For the most part all of this posturing is “pre-planned” where each of the sides are aware of what the other one is doing. At least awareness is present in the upper echelons of where these decisions originate.

It is best to stand in mode of the observer and on an energetic level continues to pour forth positive intention in the direction of the dysfunctional situation. In the end, it is our intention which controls the outcome of events, and to be effective ones intention must become focused on a positive outcome. .

[Merkhava]

.

[Merkhava]

.