Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Camelot Forum > Project Camelot > Off-Topic

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2009, 07:31 AM   #126
Humble Janitor
Avalon Senior Member
 
Humble Janitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,201
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

The mere suggestion of intentional population control reeks of reptilian doings.

I'm surprised that this thread is even still alive.
Humble Janitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 10:00 AM   #127
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble Janitor View Post
The mere suggestion of intentional population control reeks of reptilian doings.

I'm surprised that this thread is even still alive.
Calling for Censhorship??!! Also Here??!! Man!

But seriously, Humble Janitor, in your love of conspiracies and shadow chasing, don't you mind any contradictions at all? - how could 'reptilians', who allegedly eat Human flesh(sic), promote population reduction through Birth Control????
Are 'reptilians' so dumb?!

Last edited by RaKaR; 06-21-2009 at 10:16 AM. Reason: Proofreading: 'how' inst. of 'who'
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 10:12 AM   #128
burgundia
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,442
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

I only know that constant increase in the population is not good...I doubt mother Earth can take it much longer...fewer animals and plants, more and more people....where is the balance?
burgundia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 10:18 AM   #129
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundia View Post
I only know that constant increase in the population is not good...I doubt mother Earth can take it much longer...fewer animals and plants, more and more people....where is the balance?
That is certainly a legitimate question - specially with the knowledge/acknowledgement, that all is connected and interdependent.


Namaste.
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 10:34 AM   #130
Traverser
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where I'm Supposed To Be - Scotland
Posts: 72
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble Janitor View Post
The mere suggestion of intentional population control reeks of reptilian doings.

I'm surprised that this thread is even still alive.
Calling for Censhorship??!! Also Here??!! Man!

But seriously, Humble Janitor, in your love of conspiracies and shadow chasing, don't you mind any contradictions at all? - who could 'reptilians', who allegedly eat Human flesh(sic), promote population reduction through Birth Control????
Are 'reptilians' so dumb?!
Blessings To You All...

Humble Janitor,
I must say I agree totally with you that the intentional control of the World's Population is wrong on all levels.
However, I must respectfully disagree with you that this thread should be closed...

I'd much rather know what what we're dealing with here when it comes to mindset of fellow Human Beings, who wish to control the World Populace...

RaKaR,
I refer to my previous post where I called for All Human Beings to live in 'Abundance'. Do you see the logic in that point of view that if this were the case, then people would have no need for larger families to work the land. Thus reducing the World Population in a more controlled and Balanced way - Nature's Way...

BROOK,
I would just like to say to you that I appreciate all your hard work and research you've done, it's Enlightening, Thank You...

Namaste,

Love and Light to All,
Trav.

Last edited by Traverser; 06-21-2009 at 10:47 AM. Reason: additional comment...
Traverser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 11:30 AM   #131
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:

...and now we are increasing by 100 million every single year.

No wonder they call it the human race.

Solution birth control: quality of life not quantity..."


What say you?

Take action! Improve the life of mankind! Save your world!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/111795148


Two other petitions calling for awareness of overpopulation and for a world wide democratic and scientific birth control are to be found here:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/wor...-birth-control

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Bil...ecial:Petition
I have just scanned this thread for the first time...

The opening post cites two websites:
  • care2 petitionsite
  • Future of Mankind - A Blly Meier Wiki

Am I correct to say that this thread was started based on Billy Meier prophesy?
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 11:52 AM   #132
Traverser
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where I'm Supposed To Be - Scotland
Posts: 72
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by seashore View Post
I have just scanned this thread for the first time...

The opening post cites two websites:
  • care2 petitionsite
  • Future of Mankind - A Blly Meier Wiki

Am I correct to say that this thread was started based on Billy Meier prophesy?
Greetings seashore,

I believe you're correct!

It's a substantial part of it, Yes!

It still doesn't make it any more right, in my humble opinion...

Namaste,

Love and Light to All,
Trav.
Traverser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 12:10 PM   #133
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by seashore View Post
I have just scanned this thread for the first time...

The opening post cites two websites:
  • care2 petitionsite
  • Future of Mankind - A Blly Meier Wiki

Am I correct to say that this thread was started based on Billy Meier prophesy?
Greetings Seashore,

You are correct; i would just add 'Billy Meier Prophecy' and sheer common sense.
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 12:13 PM   #134
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
I believe you're correct!

It's a substantial part of it, Yes!
I noticed that Brook did a lot of research for the thread. But that research was based on news articles that were introduced in subsequent posts on the thread...

The opening post of the thread--the premise for the argument to sign a petition to end the population "explosion"--is not based on science...

I would love to see a discussion of world population based on reliable science...

But that's so hard to find. The United Nations cannot be trusted. And universities get their funding from sources controlled by the powers that be. So scientists there are under pressure and are not free to speak their minds.
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 12:21 PM   #135
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Traverser,
You wrote, i quote: "I refer to my previous post where I called for All Human Beings to live in 'Abundance'. Do you see the logic in that point of view that if this were the case, then people would have no need for larger families to work the land. Thus reducing the World Population in a more controlled and Balanced way - Nature's Way..."

Spot on! - a life of sole physical survival is really beneath Human Dignity and SPIRITUAL nature, our true essence.
I will just point to your attention, that nature in its endless wisdom has also provided us with Reason and Judgement, so that we could take care of ourselves and manage our life.
Embracing a scientific, rational, democratic and world wide Birth Control for the sake of our own selves, for future generations, Mother Earth, the Flora and fauna would indeed be exactly 'Nature's Way' - for it is in the Nature of Humans to have and make efficient use of NATURAL reason and judgement.


Namaste.
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 12:51 PM   #136
Traverser
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where I'm Supposed To Be - Scotland
Posts: 72
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
Traverser,
You wrote, i quote: "I refer to my previous post where I called for All Human Beings to live in 'Abundance'. Do you see the logic in that point of view that if this were the case, then people would have no need for larger families to work the land. Thus reducing the World Population in a more controlled and Balanced way - Nature's Way..."

Spot on! - a life of sole physical survival is really beneath Human Dignity and SPIRITUAL nature, our true essence.
I will just point to your attention, that nature in its endless wisdom has also provided us with Reason and Judgement, so that we could take care of ourselves and manage our life.
Embracing a scientific, rational, democratic and world wide Birth Control for the sake of our own selves, for future generations, Mother Earth, the Flora and fauna would indeed be exactly 'Nature's Way' - for it is in the Nature of Humans to have and make efficient use of NATURAL reason and judgement.


Namaste.
Greetings RaKar,

I have to point out that I feel that your replay is somewhat out of context to the question I posed which was regarding all people's of the world living in 'Abundance'.

Again I respectfully ask; "Do you see the logic in that point of view that if this were the case, then people would have no need for larger families to work the land. Thus reducing the World Population in a more controlled and Balanced way - Nature's Way..."

It is precisely the lack of 'Abundance' that is the 'Root Cause' and has forced Human Being's to increase in numbers. We are all indeed in very fortunate positions and we don't find ourselves fearing for our survival or that of our family...

Again, this is Man's solution to a perceived problem, let's get to the 'Root Cause' and stop ignoring what's blatantly staring us in the face...


'Abundance is Key'

Namaste,

Love and Light to All,
Trav.
Traverser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 01:18 PM   #137
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Hello again, Traverser,

I believe, i answered your question by tackling it from 'its roots': abundance being the key'.
The point is, abundance demands sustainability and sustainablity passes through a responsible attitude towards ourselves, our number and legitimate needs and the rest of Nature, Mother Earth.
How would you otherwise achieve that abundance?
Our houses, recreation and sport spaces, factories... are taking much of the room.
The air and water are being heavily polluted.
Species of both the fauna and flora are being extincted, because their natural habitats are being invaded - think of honey bees, for instance.
How much cultivable land is still left?
Our food comes from the countryside - while most of us are packed in cities.

How would you increase the production, to reach that abundance? - by increasing the use of chemicals, which would poison the soil and water still more?

Or are you thinking of the legendary and mysterious free energy, the panacea? - where is it? Who has it? Will those having it, share its benefits with all Mankind?

And actually, even with a free energy device, we would need to follow natural laws, that is that the land needs time to naturally recover, after a certain nombre of years of exploitation.


Abundance is also not only limited to having enough food, clean water and other commodities; it is about creating a living situation, whereby we, Humans, could also spiritually grow - and Spirituality supposes, as a necessary condition, due care for other life forms.

So, i say, let's work with what we REALLY have and be self responsible.


Namaste, indeed.
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 01:51 PM   #138
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:

You are correct; i would just add 'Billy Meier Prophecy' and sheer common sense.
I have to say that my common sense does not accept the premise that the math shows that we will overtake our planet if we don't intervene in the birth rate.

Or has the thread disposed of this idea and is debating something else now?
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 02:00 PM   #139
TruthWillSetUFree
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 673
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

I can't believe this thread is still alive either. There is nothing you can say to legitimize this bs.

A few other thoughts would be


I believe more souls are coming in at this time to help with the transition.

No one on the planet has the right to play God about the population.

Someone mentioned we could find a way to feed everyone on the planet IF we wanted to. This is the Truth. TPTB want us to think that we are at fault for living, just like we are at fault for 'global warming', at fault for using gas, at fault cause we were born with sin on our souls, etc etc. It is all made up to program us in a subservient mindset.
We have had free energy for a long time but they 'suicided' those that tried to bring it to the public, we had the electric car before 'they' shut it down and took it away.

If this world hadn't been used to make them richer and the masses poorer every human being would be feeding their families without any problem. That is a basic survival mechanism in humans. They make it difficult, rob countries, close down whole business's and cause recessions and depressions, then blame it on over population.

What ****

I am done with this thread
TruthWillSetUFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 02:00 PM   #140
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by seashore View Post
I have to say that my common sense does not accept the premise that the math shows that we will overtake our planet if we don't intervene in the birth rate.

Or has the thread disposed of this idea and is debating something else now?
Hi Seashore,
Read, " sheer common sense ...of the author of the thread":-)
And no, as you can see, the thread is still on it - and it is rock'n!

Cheers!
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 02:02 PM   #141
RaKaR
Avalon Senior Member
 
RaKaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthWillSetUFree View Post
I can't believe this thread is still alive either. There is nothing you can say to legitimize this bs.

A few other thoughts would be


I believe more souls are coming in at this time to help with the transition.

No one on the planet has the right to play God about the population.

Someone mentioned we could find a way to feed everyone on the planet IF we wanted to. This is the Truth. TPTB want us to think that we are at fault for living, just like we are at fault for 'global warming', at fault for using gas, at fault cause we were born with sin on our souls, etc etc. It is all made up to program us in a subservient mindset.
We have had free energy for a long time but they 'suicided' those that tried to bring it to the public, we had the electric car before 'they' shut it down and took it away.

If this world hadn't been used to make them richer and the masses poorer every human being would be feeding their families without any problem. That is a basic survival mechanism in humans. They make it difficult, rob countries, close down whole business's and cause recessions and depressions, then blame it on over population.

What ****

I am done with this thread
Good for you!
Keep your belief for yourself and let others be themselves, please.

Take good care.
RaKaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:07 PM   #142
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt
From The Sunday Times

March 22, 2009


Jonathan Leake and Brendan Montague

JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.

Porritt’s call will come at this week’s annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT), of which he is patron.

The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably.

Porritt said: “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure.
Each person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.”

Population growth is one of the most politically sensitive environmental problems. The issues it raises, including religion, culture and immigration policy, have proved too toxic for most green groups.

However, Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Rapley, who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year.

“We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder,” he said.

Such views on population have split the green movement. George Monbiot, a prominent writer on green issues, has criticised population campaigners, arguing that “relentless” economic growth is a greater threat.

Many experts believe that, since Europeans and Americans have such a lopsided impact on the environment, the world would benefit more from reducing their populations than by making cuts in developing countries.

This is part of the thinking behind the OPT’s call for Britain to cut population to 30m — roughly what it was in late Victorian times.

Britain’s population is expected to grow from 61m now to 71m by 2031. Some politicians support a reduction.

Phil Woolas, the immigration minister, said: “You can’t have sustainability with an increase in population.”

The Tory leader, David Cameron, has also suggested Britain needs a “coherent strategy” on population growth.

Despite these comments, however, government and Conservative spokesmen this weekend both distanced themselves from any population policy. ”

Please answer this...HOW do they plan on achieving this?

I also must say...there is politics all over this article....pure POLITICS
I keep hearing from you there is this critical need to lower the population....just exactly how do they plan on doing this?

And remember several posts back, I questioned the motives....I keep seeing the same group of aristocrats and political people involved with this organization.
Conspiracies are not the only issue here..there are cold hard facts to consider...one of the members of this organization....
Paul Ehrlich ....wrote a book back in 1968...stating the very thing you are stating now, via this organization.....not only did his prediction NOT come true, but he lost a BET...that key minerals would face depletion due to this problem....not only was he wrong...they actually abounded in key minerals..dropping the index rate in the market. As far as food supply ...well in his time of indicating disaster..the world food supply TRIPLED ....
I want to see some cold hard FACTS..not political agenda here...what do you have to offer us that is NOT tainted by big media, or political agendas. Or for that matter that could not be corrected by Political Change, and investment in mankind instead of big banking.


Last edited by BROOK; 06-21-2009 at 07:10 PM.
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:22 PM   #143
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Indefinite population growth being physically impossible, it must stop at some point: either sooner through fewer births by contraception and humane, pro-active population policy; or later through more deaths by famine, disease, war, and environmental collapse; or some combination of these

I
t is not Physically impossible....political rhetoric in my view

famine, disease, war, and environmental collapse; or some combination of these......again....WAR...DISEASE....this sounds more like threats to me.

this taken from your post here # 116
http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...t=12538&page=5
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:50 PM   #144
Traverser
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where I'm Supposed To Be - Scotland
Posts: 72
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Blessings to you RaKaR and to All,

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
Hello again, Traverser,

I believe, i answered your question by tackling it from 'its roots': abundance being the key'.
The point is, abundance demands sustainability and sustainablity passes through a responsible attitude towards ourselves, our number and legitimate needs and the rest of Nature, Mother Earth.
How would you otherwise achieve that abundance?
I firmly believe that we could better Manage and Distribute, the resourses of our planet. Right now, as we speak, this planet is being run by greed. That is true, I hope you'd agree..?

Now that said, the power of change lies within us, All Government's and All People's of the World. We, particularly First World Countries are Consumer driven, there is too much waste, too much over indulgence, without a care or thought for others. This has to change if we want to see a shift in our current paradigm.

Here is a link to an article from BBC NEWS; The Waste & Resources Action Programme estimate that householders in the UK waste £10.2bn each year (Approx $15.0bn). This is the UK only, now take that Globally, and you get the picture. No matter your stand point on this whole issue, that would feed, give shelter and clothe a lot of people...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7389351.stm


Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
Our houses, recreation and sport spaces, factories... are taking much of the room.
The air and water are being heavily polluted.
Species of both the fauna and flora are being extincted, because their natural habitats are being invaded - think of honey bees, for instance.
How much cultivable land is still left?
Our food comes from the countryside - while most of us are packed in cities.
The very point you make Our homes, recreational spaces and factories taking up to much room is nonsensical. Every Human Being on the face of the Earth could live in any state in the US, this is a Fact!

The very issue of polution has to be addressed and I for one don't think that Renewable Energy is being fully utilised, no where near it. So Wind Power, Tidal, Geothermal and Solar Energy and many others need heavier investment, but that wouldn't suit the Plutocricy.

As for the invasion of natural habitats, this is created by man's insatiable greed, which I'd suggest is the 'Root Cause' here... Not, over population as you'd suggest. The World population is what it is because of the way Human Beings are forced to scratch out a living.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
How would you increase the production, to reach that abundance? - by increasing the use of chemicals, which would poison the soil and water still more?

Or are you thinking of the legendary and mysterious free energy, the panacea? - where is it? Who has it? Will those having it, share its benefits with all Mankind?

And actually, even with a free energy device, we would need to follow natural laws, that is that the land needs time to naturally recover, after a certain nombre of years of exploitation.
This point was covered in my first and second answers; Better Management and Distibution of what we already have. And Heavier Investment into Renewable Energy, much more than there is now.

I've never mentioned Free Energy up until this point. So, since you brought the subject up, I believe the technology exists. But, if they can't/won't give us Renewable Energy, then Free Energy will be a long way off. I wouldn't hold my breath, put it that way...


Quote:
Originally Posted by RaKaR View Post
Abundance is also not only limited to having enough food, clean water and other commodities; it is about creating a living situation, whereby we, Humans, could also spiritually grow - and Spirituality supposes, as a necessary condition, due care for other life forms.

So, i say, let's work with what we REALLY have and be self responsible.
I Agree with All of what you say here...
Looks like we've found some middle ground RaKaR.


Namaste,

Love and Light to All,
Trav.
Traverser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:01 PM   #145
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

More members of this organization...very politically involved group



Sara Parkin

Sara Parkin is a former Green Party of England and Wales activist. She rose to prominence during and after the 1989 European election, in which the Green Party received 15% of the vote. She left the Greens as the result of internal feuds in the wake of constitutional changes she introduced, and went on to found the Forum for the Future with Jonathon Porritt.

Political career

Parkin joined the Ecology Party in the 1970s, partly as the result of the influence of public lectures by Conrad Hal Waddington. in 1979 she stood as a Ecology candidate against Keith Joseph. Parkin also contributed to the development of Green Parties world wide. After 1989, she emerged as the most articulate and telegenic Green party spokesperson, alongside David Icke.

She was credited with both being personally close to Green Party policy views, and practical in terms of political tactics.

She was considered a highly dynamic figure within the party during the 1989 elections: “Quite often we'd be exhausted in the office and she'd burst through the door and bring with her new thoughts and ideas,” said Caroline Lucas at the time.

Walter Schwartz wrote, after the 1989 results that “she could be the party’s best all-rounder, the easiest of the Greens to imagine as a cabinet minister. She is a highly organised political animal. Most Greens are not."

However, during the 1989 conference, internal disputes began to arise. Parkin was defeated in her attempt to initiate negotiations with other parties to establish a pro-proportional representation alliance against the Conservative Party.

She also at this stage supported ideas to slim down the number of official external spokespeople, Principal Speakers but rejected the idea of a single leader.

Later, she became associated with the group Green 2000 which advocated wholesale constitutional changes to the Green Party, including creating an Executive with a single Chair and only two Principal Speakers. Although successful in getting these changes agreed and winning almost all the positions on the Executive staked everything on the 1992 general election which brought a complete lack of success. The fall out resulted in Parkin and others becoming the target of a 'recall' campaign which, although unsuccessful, was thought to be a factor in why Parkin withdrew from the re-election competition as Chair of the Green Party and subsequently left the party and active politics.
Life after politics

Parkin moved on to create the Forum for the Future with two other past Green party activists, Porritt and Paul Ekins.

While at the Forum, she designed the pioneering Forum Leadership for Sustainable Development Masters.

She also currently sits on the boards of the Natural Environment Research Council, the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education and Head Teachers into Industry, and from 2000-2006 was a board member of the Environment Agency for England and Wales. Sara is a Companion of the Institution of Civil Engineering and the Institute of Energy.[2] She is a Trustee of the St. Andrews Prize and Advisor to the Population and Sustainability Network.

Norman Myers

Professional career

Myers is currently Professor and Visiting Fellow at Green College, Oxford University, and at the Said Business School. He is an Adjunct Professor at Duke University. He holds visiting professorships at Harvard, Cornell, Stanford and Berkeley.

Myers has been a senior advisor to organizations such as the United Nations, the World Bank, the White House, scientific academies in a dozen countries, influential politicians (including six prime ministers and presidents) and business leaders worldwide. He has publicized his work in hundreds of scholarly papers and popular articles and 19 books (sales of these books, over one million copies).

Dr. Myers’ expertise in both the natural sciences and the social sciences has enabled him to contribute responses to a broad range of environmental issues, including: population pressures, developing country poverty, over-consumption, unsustainable agriculture, climate change, and environmental security.

One of the chief characteristics of Norman Myers’ research is his penchant for raising new questions as well as supplying new answers to established questions. He has pioneered more than 15 research issues.

Recently, Myers has given support to the Forests Now Declaration, which calls for new market based mechanisms to protect tropical forests. He is a patron of the Optimum Population Trust.
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:17 PM   #146
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

The cry should go up in Europe: more babies, please
From The Times



Melanie McDonagh

Of all the bogeys you might have thought well and truly nailed in the past decade or so, the population control movement seemed most obviously to have a stake through its heart. At a time when we – I mean, anyone over 35 – are all horribly conscious that there won’t be enough taxpayers to support us in gin and cigarettes in our old age, the very last thing we need to worry about is excess population growth. On the contrary: as seen from the dinner party circuit, the real crisis is the difficulty for female graduates in getting anyone to breed with. Forty per cent of women graduates don’t have a single baby at the age of 35.

But, against all the odds, the population control lobby is back and trying to make the breeders feel guilty. The Optimum Population Trust – a wonderfully loaded title – made a call this week for families in the UK to limit themselves to no more than two children. It was like stepping into a time warp, back to the Seventies. Britain’s birthrate, growing at its fastest for nearly 30 years – at 1.87 children per couple – is, says the author of its report, Professor John Guillebaud, an environmental liability. “Each new UK birth, through the inevitable resource consumption and pollution that UK affluence generates, is responsible for about 160 times as much climate-related environmental damage as a new birth in Ethiopia.” He wants the Government to appeal to families to “stop at two children”, with particular reference to fecund teenage girls. Funny, I dimly recall Patricia Hewitt, as Health Secretary, opining that couples ought to have three children – one for each parent, and one for the State.

And there is the hint – but just a hint – from the Optimum Population people that if voluntary restraints do not work, governments will bring in coercive measures. The example that springs to mind here is, of course, China and its compulsory one-child policy. I’ve come across some distinguished academics myself who wouldn’t dream of trying to impose coerced abortion here but have made it quite clear, in private conversation, that we should all be grateful on environmental grounds that it happens in China.

Most environmentalists are more sensitive, at least in their public pronouncements. But undeniably, population control is back on the public agenda. There was a nuanced BBC radio discussion on this subject to coincide with the Live Earth concert between the writer George Monbiot and Chris Rapley, the head of the British Antarctic Survey, in which Professor Rapley declared that population growth was the “Cinderella subject” in the environmental debate. More people equals more carbon emissions: simple as that. Monbiot agreed that the subject was not talked about as much as it should be and emphasised that if we’re talking about population control, we have to worry not just about the developing world but about the breeding habits of the affluent West. About us.

That sounds dandy. The nice approach to curbing population growth is by making family planning more freely available in the developing world and in particular, to educate girls, who then marry later and have fewer children. The complementary route is to increase economic growth in developing countries: when people don’t have to rely on children as their seed corn for old age, they tend to have smaller families. Trouble is, increased economic
growth also means higher carbon emissions. You can’t win.

But when it comes to the suggestion that in Western Europe, and especially Britain, we should be cutting back on babies, especially among the indigenous population, well, the family planners have got to be nuts. Do they all have private pension provision, own homes and health insurance, or what? The rest of us – including those, like me, who are eco-puritans – have a vested interest in ensuring that the Continent does not shrink out of existence. We’ve got our old age to think about. The price of family homes in Britain and Ireland is already the most effective contraceptive measure ever known.

Don’t the environmentalists get out at all? Don’t they realise that there are only two classes in Britain for whom three or more children are an option – the rich, for whom mortgages don’t matter, and the poor, whose children are supported by the benefit system? The increase in the birth rate this year was largely accounted for by immigrants and older, richer mothers. One reason why there's such resentment – articulated by the Labour minister Margaret Hodge – among white working-class Britons about asylum-seekers with children getting social housing ahead of them is that the system seems to discriminate against couples who postpone having children until they can afford them in favour of ethnic minority communities with large families.

Europe needs more babies – the average continental family has a mere 1.37 children. Cutting back non-EU immigration to limit pressure on housing stock would help. So would state cash handouts. In Portugal, where the birthrate has fallen to 1.7 children per couple, the Government has considered giving tax breaks to people who have more than two children and levying higher taxes on those who have fewer. Germany is similarly concerned – it could lose the equivalent of the population of the former East Germany within 50 years. Russia’s population is contracting at the rate of three quarters of a million a year: the resourceful Mr Putin is paying mothers to have a second child.

The last thing we should be doing is bullying people to breed less. The population controllers have to be put back in their box. You know, Augustus Caesar had a tax on Roman bachelors. With due allowances for gay men and professional celibates, there’s lots to be said for the idea.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle2067023.ece
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:46 PM   #147
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

The Population Control Agenda
Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.


One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that there are human beings dedicated to coercive population control and genocide. Many readers will acknowledge that our government is helping to finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, forced sterilization, infanticide, and control of the numbers of live births. Most readers will accept the fact that our nation is helping to finance the United Nations' world-wide "family planning program," a form of population control. Most rational men and women, however, find it impossible to believe that such programs are really part of a "master plan" to kill off large segments of the world's population.
I shall have to admit that I studied the politics of AIDS (HIV disease) for over a decade before I finally came to a horrifying conclusion. The real motivation behind efforts to block utilization of standard public health measures to control further spread of the HIV epidemic was "population control." That was not an easy concept for me to acknowledge, despite the fact that I had long recognized that the twentieth century has been the bloodiest hundred-year period in all recorded human history.
It was not until I journeyed to Elberton, Georgia, stood within the dark shadows of the great Druid-like monument built there, and read the words engraved on the massive stone pillars of that structure that I finally came to accept the truth. At that point it became obvious that just as our Lord has given mankind Ten Commandments to guide our lives, so, too, those from "the dark side" have been given their instructions from the "one" they worship. The ten programs of the "guides" are inscribed in eight different languages on the four great granite pillars of the American Stonehenge. That message foretells a terrifying future for humanity, and explains why efforts to approach the AIDS epidemic from a logical point of view have been consistently thwarted.1
Before you scoff, and reject my suggestion as some sort of madness, check out my references, then try to disprove my conclusions. If my allegations are unfounded, you will soon recognize the deception and return to your daily activities, certain that there is no cause for concern. On the other hand, should you determine that my assessment is correct, or even partially correct, then you have a moral obligation to decide just what part you intend to play in response to the unfolding world genocide - how you will protect yourself, your loved ones, and the countless millions of helpless human beings throughout the world who have been marked for destruction.
You must never forget the warning recorded for posterity by Martin Niemoeller, the Lutheran minister who lived in Hitler's Germany during the 1930s and 1940s. His words echo down to us over succeeding decades:
"In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up." 2
You will note that Reverend Niemoeller warned that after coming for the Jews the Nazis came for both Catholics and Protestants. Why is that fact never mentioned? The question that I am most frequently asked is, "How can you possibly believe that there are people who intend to kill off large segments of the world's population?" My answer is really quite simple. I hold that belief because I have read their writings. I believe they are telling the truth. Just as Adolf Hitler wrote of his plans for Europe in "Mein Kampf" (My Plan), so, too, those who intend to depopulate large segments of the earth have written of the necessity of limiting the world's population. They fully intend to "exterminate" a significant portion of the world's population. The fact that the vast majority of Americans have never heard of their intent, of The Georgia Guidestones in Elberton, or of "The Plan" and "The
Hierarchy" attests to the degree of control that exists over what the American people have been allowed to know about the occultic forces which are working within our society today.
Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood
As you read on you will soon discover that I have primarily relied on material which can be readily found in books, audio-taped interviews, and public news sources. If you take the time to check my references, you will soon discover that there really are those who have publicly advocated the elimination of "human weeds" and "the cleansing of society." Indeed, to this very day your tax money is used to finance Planned Parenthood, an organization founded by Margaret Sanger. During the 1930s Margaret Sanger openly supported the Nazi plan for genetic engineering of the German population, and the propagation of a "super race."
In Planned Parenthood's 1985 "Annual Report" leaders of that organization proclaimed that they were, "Proud of our past, and planning for our future." 3
How could anyone possibly claim to be proud of the organization founded by Margaret Sanger when history records that she wrote of the necessity of: "the extermination of 'human weeds' ...the 'cessation of charity,' ... the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,' and ... the sterilization of 'genetically inferior races.'"4
Margaret Sanger published "The Birth Control Review." In that magazine she openly supported the "infanticide program" promoted by Nazi Germany in the 1930s, and publicly championed Adolf Hitler's goal of Aryan white supremacy. In the years prior to World War II Margaret Sanger commissioned Ernst Rudin, a member of the Nazi Party, and director of the dreaded German Medical Experimentation Programs, to serve as an advisor to her organization. In his excellent book "Killer Angel," George Grant chronicles the life and writings of Margaret Sanger, and painstakingly documents Sanger's plans for the genetic engineering of the human race. George Grant noted that in the 1920s Margaret Sanger wrote "The Pivot of Civilization" in which she called for:
"The 'elimination of 'human weeds,' for the 'cessation of charity' because it prolonged the lives of the unfit, for the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,' and for the sterilization of genetically inferior races.'"5
ccording to George Grant, Margaret Sanger believed that the unfit should not be allowed to reproduce. Accordingly, she opened a birth control clinic in: "The Brownsville section of New York, an area populated by newly immigrated Slavs, Latins, Italians, and Jews. She targeted the 'unfit' for her crusade to 'save the planet.'" 6
Nineteen years later, in 1939, Margaret Sanger organized her "Negro project," a program designed to eliminate members of what she believed to be an "inferior race." Margaret Sanger justified her proposal because she believed that: "The masses of Negroes ...particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit..." 7
Margaret Sanger then went on to reveal that she intended to hire three or four Colored Ministers "to travel to various black enclaves to propagandize for birth control." She wrote: "The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." (emphasis added-Ed.) 8
As Margaret Sanger's organization grew in power, influence, and acceptance, she began to write of the necessity of targeting religious groups for destruction as well, believing that the "dysgenic races" should include "Fundamentalists and Catholics" in addition to "blacks, Hispanics, (and) American Indians." 9
As the years went by, Margaret Sanger became increasingly obsessed with her occultic beliefs. Along with her acceptance of the occult, she became increasingly hostile to both Christianity and the American precepts of individual freedom under God. Her distaste for America can be seen in her writings when she wrote: "Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism." 10 Margaret Sanger eventually embraced not only communism but theosophy as well. What is theosophy? It is a covert, occultic religion based upon the repudiation of God and the worship of Lucifer. In modern-day America, theosophy is one of the most powerful hidden (occult) forces working behind the scenes in New York City, Washington D.C., and across our nation today. 11
How many times have you been told that Adolf Hitler killed 6 million Jews in the Holocaust? What you probably have never been told, however, is the segment of the Holocaust tragedy recorded by Professor Norman Cohn in his historical account of the Jewish Holocaust, "Warrant for Genocide." Professor Cohn chronicled the dark days of World War II, noting: Only about a third of the civilians killed by the Nazis and their accomplices were Jews ...Other peoples were marked out for decimation, subjugation, and enslavement, and the civilian losses of some of these (countries - Ed.) amounted to 11 per cent to 12 per cent of the total population." 12
If Professor Cohn's figures are accurate - and I feel certain that they are, because other Jewish researchers have come up with similar figures - then why haven't the Christians of America been allowed to learn the fact that in addition to the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis, somewhere between 7 and 12 million non-Jews were also ruthlessly liquidated in Hitler's Germany?
I believe this information has been intentionally suppressed because those who were killed were largely Christians, and the covert forces which control the reality of the American public today do not want the followers of Jesus Christ in our nation to awaken to their peril ...until it is far too late. Hitler hated not only Jews and Judaism, he also hated Christians and Christianity as well. Why was that? Because Adolf Hitler, just like Margaret Sanger, was a disciple of theosophy and of Madame Blavatsky, the founder of a religion that worshipped Lucifer. Accordingly, both Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler were energized by the same "dark, spiritual forces." The fact that most of our citizens have never heard of Madame Blavatsky, theosophy, or that two of theosophy's most ardent disciples were Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger clearly reflects the degree of control that exists over what the American people have been allowed to learn about the occultic forces at work in our nation today.
As a researcher on the subject of the occult, I regularly receive letters and publications from the Lucis Trust. The Lucis Trust of today is the modern-day extension of the "Lucifer Publishing Company," an organization founded by Alice Bailey during the early years of the twentieth century. Alice Bailey was a disciple of Madame Blavatsky and the nominal leader of the Theosophical Society between the early 1900s and the late 1920s. Because the name "Lucifer" had such a bad connotation in those days, Alice Bailey changed the name of her organization from "The Lucifer Publishing Company" to "The Lucis Trust." The nature and beliefs of her organization, however, have always remained the same. The Lucis Trust of today is one of the major front groups through which theosophy works to influence life here in America. The supernatural powers that still energize The Lucis Trust today certainly come from the same dark, spiritual forces that energized Madame Blavatsky, Adolf Hitler, and Margaret Sanger in generations past.
Publications from The Lucis Trust regularly refer to "The Plan" for humanity that has been established by "The Hierarchy." Part of that plan is inscribed on the great granite pillars of the American Stonehenge in Elberton, Georgia ... "The Georgia Guidestones." 13
A full discussion on the subjects of population control and occultism is far beyond the scope of this short monograph. Full documentation on these subjects will be found in my soon-to-be-published book, "None Dare Call It Genocide." At this point let me simply offer a few examples of the views expressed by those who publicly advocate population reduction and/or genocide.
David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times Book Review Section, October 22, 1989, as saying: "Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true ... We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth ...Until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along." 14
Michael Fox, when he was the vice-president of The Humane Society of the United States wrote, "Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish and unethical animal on the earth." 15
In "The First Global Revolution," published by The Council of the Club of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note that: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention ...The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." 16
he Los Angeles Times of April 5, 1994 quoted Cornell University Professor David Pimentel, speaking before the American Association for the Advancement of Science, as saying that, "The total world population should be no more than 2 billion rather than the current 5.6 billion."
In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: "The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it."17
Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," wrote, "At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." 18
egative Population Growth Inc. of Teaneck, New Jersey recently circulated a letter stating their long-range goal. "We believe that our goal for the United States should be no more than 150 million, our size in 1950. For the world, we believe our goal should be a population of not more than two billion, its size shortly after the turn of the century." 19
n the Global Assessment Report of UNEP (a United Nations sponsored study group), Phase One Draft, Section 9, the authors quoted an expert who suggested that: "A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible." 20
More New Age Influence
Speaking at a round-table discussion group at the Gorbachev Conference held in San Francisco in the fall of 1996, Dr. Sam Keen, a New Age writer and philosopher stated that there was strong agreement that religious institutions have to take a primary responsibility for the population explosion. He went on to say that, "We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control the population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."
Mr. Keen's remarks were met with applause from the assembled audience made up largely of New Age adherents, Socialists, Internationalists and occultists. Many of the leading occultists of our modern world attended that meeting in San Francisco, a meeting organized by Mikhail Gorbachev, former Director of the Soviet KGB, and later President of Russia. 21
What is the message found on The Georgia Guidestones? What is the plan of the "guides"? If you read occultic literature, you will soon find that those who worship Lucifer today refer to a "Hierarchy" that guides both their actions and the affairs of the world. Who are the "Hierarchy"? The Lucis Trust, formerly The Lucifer Publishing Company, recently sent a letter to their supporters stating, "The spiritual Hierarchy makes definite use of the twelve spiritual Festival periods. We can learn to cooperate with the members of the Hierarchy as they work to bring the divine Plan to the attention of men and women of goodwill and spiritual aspiration everywhere throughout the world. The idea of spiritual approach - of Hierarchy to humanity and humanity to Hierarchy - is the primary principle underlying meditation ...understanding of how the spiritual energies which flow through each zodiacal sign can illumine and inspire right human relations." 22
The ancient Druids were members of an occultic religion; the circle of monuments at Stonehenge in England is occultic; and the message engraved on the American Stonehenge in Elberton is occultic. Yoko Ono is the widow of John Lennon, a man who was deeply involved in the occult. Yoko Ono has written a musical score with three movements dedicated to the message of The Georgia Guidestones. She was recently quoted as saying, "I want people to know about the stones ...We're headed toward a world where we might blow ourselves up and maybe the globe will not exist ... it's a nice time to reaffirm ourselves, knowing all the beautiful things that are in this country, and The Georgia Stones symbolize that." 23
What is the message to modern-day man which is engraved on the great stone pillars of the Druid-like monument in Elberton? The first of the "guides" reads: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. (This-Ed.) Means the entire human race at its climax level for permanent balance with nature."
he Infamous Tuskegee Study
In recent history, we have seen the influence of occultic population control advocates here in America. Nowhere is that influence better demonstrated than in the Tuskegee Study, a scientific research program in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited by the U.S. Public Health Service back in 1932. The participants were all told that they would be treated for their infections, but instead of treating their illness, all medicines were withheld. The black men were then actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, and the bodies of their wives and children, were systematically ravaged by disease.he evil men who conceived that Nazi-style study justified their atrocity by alleging that scientists needed to learn how untreated syphilis progressed in the human body. For a period of forty years, between 1932 and 1972, the genocidal Tuskegee Study continued. It was not until 1972, when one newspaper finally had the courage to break the story to the public, that the Tuskegee Study was finally terminated. By that time, only 125 of the original 400 black men had survived.
To this very day, 24 years after the end of that grotesque human experiment, none of the perpetrators of that atrocity have ever been either accused or indicted for their crimes. Back in 1932, when the Tuskegee Study began, Margaret Sanger's ideas had already begun to infect the minds and souls of physicians and scientists here in America. According to Margaret Sanger's sense of morality, experiments on "human weeds" were fully justified in the name of "science." Do you honestly believe for one moment that such an experiment would have been tolerated here in America had the participants been white men? 24
Another far more effective method of reducing the world population was devised in the early 1960s by a group of environmentalists and population-control adherents. They set out to block the use of DDT for mosquito and malaria control after it had been found that the insecticide was extremely effective in saving human lives.
Alexander King, president of the Club of Rome, wrote, "My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem." 25
In 1970 The National Academy of Sciences, in their book "Life Sciences," stated that, "In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million deaths due to malaria."
To population-control advocates, this irresponsible preservation of human life was unconscionable, so they set out to outlaw further use of the pesticide. Up until 1970 all reliable scientific data had consistently demonstrated that DDT was completely safe for both humans and animals. Indeed, DDT was the safest pesticide ever known to mankind. Furthermore, it was inexpensive and could be widely used in third-world countries to control the spread of insect-borne diseases. Accordingly, population-control adherents set out to have DDT banned in the name of saving the environment.
You have probably read the contrived stories alleging that DDT caused softening of eggshells, interfered with the balance of nature, and endangered humanity by entering into the food chain. In truth, all of those stories were fabricated, and were simply part of a carefully coordinated program to block further use of the life-saving pesticide. If you are interested in learning the truth concerning the deceitful campaign waged against DDT, I suggest that you order a copy of my audio-taped interviews with Dr. J. Gordon Edwards. Dr. Edwards is a world-renowned biologist who led the fight in the 1960s to counter the propaganda program waged by environmentalists and population-control advocates to ban further use of DDT. You can also order a copy of Dr. Edward's excellent monograph, "Remembering Silent Spring and its Consequences."
William Ruckelshaus was a long-time member of the Environmental Defense Fund, and the Director of the EPA. He outlawed further use of DDT in 1972 despite the recommendation of the chairman of the EPA investigating committee which had heard six months of testimony on use of the pesticide, and had determined that DDT was completely safe. When Ruckelshaus outlawed further use of DDT, he signed the death warrant for hundreds of millions of helpless human beings living in third-world countries. To those energized by the dark side, however, the loss of hundreds of millions of human lives was relatively inconsequential.In his excellent monograph, "Remembering Silent Spring and its Consequences," Professor J. Gordon Edwards quoted from a speech delivered by Victor Yanconne, founder of the Environmental Defense Fund. In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told to him by a reporter who had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far greater use of much more toxic pesticides. Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied: "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way as any." hen asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing of people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because organo phosphate acts locally and only kills farmworkers and most of them are Mexicans and Negroes." 26
How many people have died in the past 25 years since the use of DDT was outlawed? If the National Academy of Sciences was correct in their 1970 assessment that 500 million lives had been saved by DDT over a twenty-year period, then we have probably lost well over 600 million human lives during the past twenty-five years since advocates of population control succeeded in outlawing DDT. 27
The Relationship Between Abortion, Breast Carcinoma, and Population Control
Let me offer another example of a population control program which is being promoted here in the United States today. Many physicians have expressed their concern about the dramatic increase in breast carcinoma seen in women in recent years.
Despite the fact that 18 scientific studies published in both domestic and foreign medical journals have clearly demonstrated the direct causal relationship between first-trimester abortion and breast cancer, all efforts to disseminate that information here in the United States have been consistently blocked by those who favor abortion and population control. In the fall of 1996 a new scientific paper dealing with a meta-analysis of 23 different scientific studies on the relationship between first-trimester abortions and breast cancer was published in a British medical journal.
That study clearly demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer in women who had had first-trimester abortions. In response to that publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Cancer Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population-control advocates joined together in an unholy alliance to attack the conclusions of the authors, and to block all efforts to disseminate that information to American physicians. All of the organizations mentioned above continue to oppose efforts to have physicians warn women of the risk they face when they submit themselves to first-trimester abortions. Before carrying out all surgical procedures in America "advised consent" is required, except for abortion.
The AMA. the ACS, and the pro-death lobby continue to insist that women must not be advised of the risk they incur when they destroy the life of their unborn child. Why is there such inconsistency? Current abortion policies in America are absolutely necessary to reduce our population. That is why a minor child can be taken from school to an abortion clinic without parental notification, yet that same child cannot be given an aspirin without parental consent. It all has to do with population control. 28
Population Control in Russia Today
Another dramatic example of population control is the tragedy being played out in the "former" Soviet Union today in regard to male longevity. In Russia, the life span of the average Russian male has dropped precipitously over the past several decades. The average life expectancy of an American male is 74-78 years of age, and in Japan the average life span is 78 years, but the average life span of Russian men has fallen from 68 years in the 1970s to 63.8 years in 1985, to 57.7 years in 1994. It is estimated that, if current trends continue, the average life span of a Russian male will be 53 years shortly after the turn of the century. Do you really believe that this shocking reduction in life span is happening simply by "accident"? The true cause of this dramatic reduction in life span in Russia will be detailed in my coming book, "None Dare Call It Genocide." 29The Massacres in Africa
One has only to learn what really happened to the Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994 to imagine what may lie in store for Christians here in America at some time in the not-too-distant future.
After the Christian Tutsis had been disarmed by governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically massacre the defenseless Christians. The massacre began in April 1994 and continued until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu forces were able to create a state of abject fear and terror within the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered hundreds of thousands of them. The United Nations immediately convened hearings on the genocide taking place in Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, the American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the "civil war had come to an end." In reality, of course, there was no civil war since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder.
In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline Albright also insisted that the word "genocide" must not be used, and that the United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene. In the three months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a million Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued. Tens of thousands of Christians were murdered in their churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in their hospitals and in their schools. On several occasions, United Nations soldiers stationed in Rwanda actually handed over helpless Christians under their protection to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces.
At the end of the carnage, in late July 1994, the American government rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid. Strangely, the American press has remained silent about the fact that almost all of those who were slaughtered were Christians, and it was the policies of our government that were primarily responsible for blocking efforts by neighboring African countries to intervene.
There are literally dozens of other examples of population- control programs which have been implemented throughout our world by modern-day "Malthusians" in their effort to ensure that the world population is dramatically curtailed. To date it is estimated that far more than one billion human lives have been terminated as a result of the world-wide abortion programs financed by the United States. In addition, we are beginning to see the devastating effects of the AIDS epidemic as this modern-day plague begins to depopulate large areas of both Asia and Africa. Because of the influence of occultic population controllers, however, all logical efforts to address the HIV epidemic throughout the world continue to be blocked. Rather than utilizing the proven public health methods used with all other illnesses, advocates of population control continue to promote both hedonistic sex education and condom distribution. In the May 1996 issue of "Special Warfare," a publication of the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, it was noted that: "The immediate future may present other daunting challenges to Civil Affairs units. Because of complicated social and cultural reasons, AIDS already infects a high proportion of the military and civilian officials of Zaire, Uganda, Kenya, Zambia, and other central Africa countries. In some or all of these countries, government establishments may collapse in the next 10-15 years. If this pattern is repeated in other areas where AIDS is spreading at an alarming rate, then civil rule may also erode or break down in parts of North Africa, the Middle East, India, and Southeast Asia."
Let me assure you that there really are hundreds of thousands of occultly energized people throughout the world today who honestly believe that human compassion is outmoded, and that the inferior peoples of the world must either be allowed to die or be actively exterminated. I will conclude this monograph by quoting from the writings of the English Churchman, Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834). In his "An Essay on the Principle of Population," Malthus wrote: "All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room may be made for them by the deaths of grown persons ...Therefore ...we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality..."

http://www.radioliberty.com/pca.htm
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 09:11 PM   #148
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Monday May 25, 2009



Commentary: World's Elite Make Population Control #1 Priority against Backdrop of Underpopulation Threat


Commentary by John-Henry Westen
NEW YORK, May 25, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Even though recent demographic study has revealed a great looming threat of demographic winter, the richest of the rich seem to believe that overpopulation is the top priority for their philanthropic endeavors. John Harlow writes today in The Times about a secret meeting of the global financial elite, convened by Microsoft mogul Bill Gates, at which attendees agreed that curbing the world's population should be their top priority.
In "Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation," Harlow recounts that a May 5 meeting took place in Manhattan that included "David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey." Harlow notes that the general agreement that population control was a major priority came at Gates' instigation.
Gates' enthusiasm for population control comes as no surprise since he has himself admitted to being strongly influenced by the views of Thomas Malthus, the fear-mongering overpopulation guru of the late 18th century. He has also admitted that his father headed a local Planned Parenthood while he was growing up. (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2003/may/03050902.html)
Of note, The Times reports that at the secret meeting, participants "discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change."
The group's priority certainly comes into conflict with Catholicism, as Pope Benedict has recently spoken of population growth as an asset rather than a deficit. In his message for World Day of Peace issued in December, Pope Benedict XVI deplored the "international campaigns afoot to reduce birth-rates, sometimes using methods that respect neither the dignity of the woman, nor the right of parents to choose responsibly how many children to have; graver still, these methods often fail to respect even the right to life."
Smashing any appeal to undertake population control in the name of alleviating poverty, the Pope added: "The extermination of millions of unborn children, in the name of the fight against poverty, actually constitutes the destruction of the poorest of all human beings."
In his message, the Pope brought demographic evidence to defend his views. "Nor must it be forgotten that, since the end of the Second World War, the world's population has grown by four billion, largely because of certain countries that have recently emerged on the international scene as new economic powers, and have experienced rapid development specifically because of the large number of their inhabitants. Moreover, among the most developed nations, those with higher birth-rates enjoy better opportunities for development.


In other words, population is proving to be an asset, not a factor that contributes to poverty," the Pope concluded. (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/dec/08121202.html) The Times paraphrased the account given by one attendee of the secret meeting who spoke anonymously, saying, "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat."
"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers," said the guest. "They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming." In answer to a question about the secrecy, the guest replied, "They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government."
In sharp contrast to the ideas of the billionaires, a recent film containing the views of some prominent demographers has sounded the alarm on underpopulation rather than overpopulation. Promoting the film 'Demographic Winter' at a recent event, celebrated columnist Don Feder said that the demographic problem of worldwide declining birthrates "could result in the greatest crisis humanity will confront in this century" as "all over the world, children are disappearing."
Feder noted, "In 30 years, worldwide, birth rates have fallen by more than 50%. In 1979, the average woman on this planet had 6 children. Today, the average is 2.9 children, and falling." He explained the situation noting, "demographers tell us that with a birthrate of 1.3, everything else being equal, a nation will lose half of its population every 45 years." (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jan/09012611.html)
See the article in The Times here:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6350303.ece

Last edited by BROOK; 06-21-2009 at 09:15 PM.
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 09:18 PM   #149
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

Monday January 26, 2009

Demographic Winter: "Schools will be turned into nursing homes. Playgrounds will become graveyards."

By John-Henry Westen

WASHINGTON, DC, January 26, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Celebrated columnist and pro-family leader Don Feder gave a jaw-dropping presentation on the coming 'Demographic Winter' at the Rose Dinner which closes the official March for Life festivities every year. Speaking to hundreds of attendees, Feder suggested that the demographic problem of worldwide declining birthrates "could result in the greatest crisis humanity will confront in this century" as "all over the world, children are disappearing."

"In the Western world, birthrates are falling and populations are aging," said Feder. "The consequences for your children and grandchildren could well be catastrophic."

Feder noted, "In 30 years, worldwide, birth rates have fallen by more than 50%. In 1979, the average woman on this planet had 6 children. Today, the average is 2.9 children, and falling." He explained the situation noting, "demographers tell us that with a birthrate of 1.3, everything else being equal, a nation will lose half of its population every 45 years."
Beyond an inability to pay for pensions, it is likely that euthanasia will be one looked-to solution to the aging crisis, he said.

"Demographic Winter is the terminal stage in the suicide of the West - the culmination of a century of evil ideas and poisonous policies,'" he said. Among them he listed:

"Abortion - As I mentioned a moment ago, worldwide, we're killing 42 million people a year. It's as if an invading army killed every man woman and child in Italy - then repeated the process every year.

"Contraception - For the first time in history, just under half the world's population of childbearing age uses some form of birth control. Some of us remember when births weren't controlled and pregnancies weren't planned. With all the wailing about man-made Global Warming, carbon footprints and the ozone layer, wouldn't it be ironic if what did us in wasn't the SUV but the IUD?

"Delayed marriage. People are marrying later and later. After 35, it becomes progressively harder for a woman to have children.

"The decline of marriage and the rise of cohabitation. Not surprisingly, in relationships without commitment, people have fewer children. By the way, the left's contribution to the coming population crisis is to push the one type of ‘marriage’ (and I use the term advisedly) that can't conceivably produce children.

"But perhaps,” he concluded, “the most important factor is a culture (including Hollywood, the news media and academia) that tells people that children are a burden, rather than a joy; that pushes an ego-driven, live-for-the-moment ethic; a culture that tells us that contentment comes from careers, love, friendship, pets, possessions, travel, personal growth - anything and everything except family and children. It's a culture that can look at Sarah Palin and her beautiful family and ask why she had to have 5 children and why she didn't abort her child with Downs syndrome."

For more see the first documentary on the plummeting birth rate:
"Demographic Winter: the decline of the human family"
http://www.demographicwinter.com

** See the full text of Feder's talk here **
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009...nnerspeech.pdf

Last edited by BROOK; 06-21-2009 at 09:21 PM.
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 09:34 PM   #150
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: END POPULATION EXPLOSION (petition)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG2IZEzUmA0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7asW73ozBqU
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
action, awareness, choice, responsibility

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon