|
|
Project Camelot General Discussion Reactions, feedback and suggestions on interviews, current events and experiences. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-29-2008, 08:24 PM | #51 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Its been interesting watching this conversation go as it has. Its been awhile since i read Sitchin's material and and i plan to reaquaint myself. There alot more info out there regarding Nibiru and the Anunnaki and I hope to add more to this topic.
|
10-29-2008, 08:31 PM | #52 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 115
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
delighted to see that im not alone about sitchin, as i thought i was for years...
|
10-29-2008, 08:42 PM | #53 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blackbutt, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
I'm reminded of how Adamski was rubbished back in the 50s and 60s but now, some of what he wrote about his experience is being confirmed. The same goes for Immanuel Velikovsky around that same period of time. Once again, many of his outrageous claims have been proven. So, exercise caution in what you accept as truth, but don't reject anything out of hand just because it doesn't fit on your page. It may just turn out that you need to get a bigger book. |
|
10-29-2008, 09:21 PM | #54 | |||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
actually there is, that is the point - there is proof that sitchin's info is false, from the very fine details to the entire broad general ideas and beliefs proposed by such theories. The proof is in his own work - it doesn't add up. It can only add up when fantasy and falsified information is added. As well, there are many declassified cia documents showing how the new age was set up and would be used(including such far out techniques as making the public believe aliens rule the world), as well it would be benificial to study all other history involving the new age culture creation, such as blavastky's writing, crowley's, etc. I believe I have responded to comments like this a few times already in this thread - No one is blindly judging, I am advocating looking into all sides of the story rather than just sitchin's. I have researched sitchin thoroughly for many years. The problem is people aren't learning about the new age, and conspiracy culture creation - and because of it they are buying into lies, that are only backed up by other lies. It's a major psyops to keep us from the real truth. Quote:
Quote:
I'm just asking that people learn more about the techniques used to control us, before thinking they have found solutions in some of these "theories" such as sitchin's. Because the more you learn how they control us, the better you are able to not buy into any of these scams. once aware, we have to get a better understanding of what we are aware of, before we can fix anything. Based on your logic, you should at least research more into what I'm saying, considering you have already researched sitchin's side of the story, and most likely already know from being bombarded the mainstream's side of the story (imho the mainstream pushes sitchin's side of the story as well as the mainstream debunker's side of the story - they play off each other). Remember, there's always more than 2 sides to the story, and the answer is never black and white, but usually grey. Even if I was wrong, and that me asking people to look into how Sitchin is illegitimate might be dis-info itself - is it not at least as worthy of being looked into as Sitchin's? The truth is tough to swallow, and most of us WANT to believe in these fantastic stories put out there that aren't true at all(like Sitchin's) - we've been trained to do so by fiction, by predictive programming. Last edited by Doom; 10-29-2008 at 09:46 PM. |
|||
10-29-2008, 09:52 PM | #55 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
As Adam Weishaupt said: "Oh, foolish man, what can you not be made to believe?" You see they have a very old system, and this is the age/time where they are bringing that system down and bringing a new one in. And because of this they are the ones who are first to put out dis-info that shows some truth(how the old system was a con-to gain followers), and then mixes it with fiction and new age beliefs, so that when others come out with the real truth afterwards, it is discredited and associated with the ficitonal conspiracy culture that they created that helps lead us down the path to their new system. first they introduce the cultures by setting up their foundations with massive funding using music, movies, books, etc., and once those are established, and people fall into them, the people become conditioned to accept the new system. And so you got all these confused truth seekers buying into one or more of these some of these top down created conspiracy sub-cultures, thinking they are opposing the establishment, when infact, the culture is just perpetuating the new world order into it's final stages. Last edited by Doom; 10-30-2008 at 12:31 AM. |
|
10-30-2008, 08:29 AM | #56 | |||||||||||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
I am a walking example of how dis-info can wake you up as I was heavily into the new age blavastky, Godfre Ray-king 30 years ago, it woke me up and by the nature of my new ability to discern I found that my source was flawed which allowed me to move on to other stuff and here I am. Todays truths are tomorrows lies - the very nature of mental evolution and even life itself. It is the mistakes we make that build our truths. Are you saying that mistakes are worthless and fruitless? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Furthermore I am really interested in your findings on the connection with Sitchen and the new age movement. Could you post some of it or PM some of that info to me? An article or anything as this really interests me. Thanks. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Bob Dean even says he lies to Kerry and Bill and this is no doubt due to the fact that he can only reveal so much. This is also true with other insiders. Perhaps even Zacharia Sitchen did this in his books. Point is, we simply do not know. my take anyway |
|||||||||||
10-30-2008, 10:26 PM | #57 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
Well...the only way it can wake someone up, is if it makes someone aware there's something going on, and then they look into it for themselves. Ie. If Sitchin makes you aware there's something crazy going on, but then you look into it and relize there is some crazy going on but that Sitchin's info was set up to mislead anyone who dared question their reality. Then Dis-info can wake one up. But most likely it will just lead them on a journey chasing your imagination around in circles. And it is hard to break out of because so much has been pushed out by the establishment that people think is waking them up, when it is actually disabling the victims minds. That's my point, stop getting the info from "whistle-blowers" and "disclosers" who are fed the dis-info or have been set up to put out the dis-info. go to the sources yourself, the documentation from the establishment, and you will see 95% of these people are mislead or liars. The real big players really running the world don't write about aliens, or reptilians, etc. because there aren't any. (aren't any here involved in anything anyway - i don't doubt there is life elsewhere in the universe). Just take a look how much establishment mainstream media support there is for aliens/reptilians/ancient astronauts. It's everywhere, much of this is documented in links I have previously provided. Like I said before as well, they put out the mainstream debunkers, and the mainstream conspiracies, and play them off each other to advance their agenda. I have posted a list of over 100 books in this thread: http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...ad.php?p=11144 Many by the elite. Please check them out if you haven't. I also should say that the declassified cia douments I'm refering to (sorry i don't have direct links - For at least one, if you can find it, CIA has declassified information about a booklet/magazine the CIA put out in the 50s called "The New Age". ) don't specifically refer to Sitchin, they refer to the setting up of the new age culture - they refer to things like creating the belief in people's minds that aliens were here in the past and created us. Almost all supporting evidence of this theory is false, and a part of the same major psyops. They want people believing this, because then the people who do have already been defeated - They disable the mind of the victim. Last edited by Doom; 10-31-2008 at 12:14 AM. |
|
10-30-2008, 10:37 PM | #58 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 100
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
|
|
10-30-2008, 11:43 PM | #59 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Cool. Yea, I've read many similar reports about the Crystal Skull not being the true artifact it is made out to be either. I can't say for sure with what you posted and the crystal skull, but I can say for sure that many, many, of these evidences for all this type of stuff has been forged/made up/etc..
|
10-31-2008, 04:00 AM | #60 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
It did not mess with any orbits as it was the ejection of gases that made it that large, not the actual mass... Funny how he missed that |
|
10-31-2008, 04:17 AM | #61 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
Well that is fine... but may I suggest that you ACTUALLY research what Sitcins DOES SAY? I shall Quote Sitchin.... Nibiru settled into a clockwise orbit (equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun). Nibiru stabilized into a clockwise orbit, equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun until 10, 900 B.C.E., when Nibiru arrived earlier, due to increasing drift from Solaris of Uranus. Uranus' gravity sped Nibiru's orbit. As a result of this close encounter between Nibiru and Uranus, one of Nibiru's moons, Miranda, was captured by and became a moon of Uranus as Nibiru and Uranus pulled at each other. From 10,000B.C.E. on, Nibiru's revolution sped to 3.450 Earth years; which makes Nibiru's next return 2900A.D. rather than 2012 as predicated on the earlier 3600- year orbit Sitchin, Z., 2007, The End of Days, pages 315 - 317 Now if Bob Dean believes Sitchin and qoutes Sitchin... why does he say 2017ish when Sitchin says 2900 AD? As you say RESEARCH... something I do well.... Quote:
On Sumerian? Yes... Mike Hieser says Nibiru means crossing point or gateway... Perhaps indeed the Sumerians had access to a Stargate... Now Sitchin based Nibiru on one cylinder seal.. Well I have several that show they had a stargate... And there is no misinterpretation that it represents a gate... Ea stands in his watery home the Apsu Enki walks out of the watery gateway to the land. Their is a good possibility that the Abyss in Revelations is indeed this same gateway... Abydos also known as Abtu or Abdju Abzu Sumerian name for the Abyss... Abyss Biblical watery gateway... Abyss = Abzu = Abtu = Abdju = Abydos From an excavation in Abydos So there are other possible interpretations But Sitchin sells books and has now a cult following... Believe as you wish... but personally I 'favor' the Stargate concept... And so does Giovanni di Paolo, a painter from 1445, "Creation of the World & Expulsion from Paradise" |
||
10-31-2008, 05:41 AM | #62 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
REgarding that painting from the 1500's, Even back then they were into puting out media to control the minds of the public, plays that were mandatory to attent, and lots and lots of art from painting to sculptures, they of course loved to scare the public with lots of gargoles. They have been creating myths of things that come from the skies for many ages. Though I can't say for sure about that particular painting, it's meanings etc., but I would have to suggest that does not have to do with a stargate.
If we read the Sumerian tablets, it’s no different from ancient India or Ra of Egypt where the God inseminates himself and all the rest of it, etc.. He has sex with the spirit of the air. It’s all to do with spirits, you understand, not people. There are no references to "stargates" in my opinion. the engraving of the 'helicopter' and other 'craft' is acutally a picture that is a composite of two quite ordinary hieroglyphic texts laid over each other. The appearance of the helicopter on the artefact was actually an artefact itself, and was formed from two separate hieroglyphs. Last edited by Doom; 10-31-2008 at 05:54 AM. |
10-31-2008, 04:52 PM | #63 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
I am about to do some heavy research on all this myself because I have pretty much discounted Nibiru as garbage and Dean's testimony is urging me to look into it further. didn't Burish discuss a stargate in Iraq? Same one maybe? hmmm My stance on all this? - undecided and seeking answers just another paradigm to add to my collection HAH! |
|
10-31-2008, 05:10 PM | #64 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
Agreed, my point is just that, more often than not, dis-info won't get the person to look more into whats behind everything, but will just get them looking deeper into the dis-info. But yes, it does happen that some people start with dis-info, but then with the relization that such deception is out there, will question the dis-info, and eventually actually wake up. |
|
10-31-2008, 05:28 PM | #65 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
it greatly depends on the person and their thirst for knowledge, and how easily satisfied they are, I am never satisfied and perhaps I just couldn't see beyond that peace |
|
10-31-2008, 09:28 PM | #66 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 650
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Is it possible that with time travelling UFO's some of these stone carving's could actually be sent back in time to be disinfo?
Just throwing in a curve ball there to this discussion. |
10-31-2008, 09:51 PM | #67 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
set our past up to support their benevolent presence so we would see them in the light they wish I have heard alot of things though, and many of them conflict interesting times eh? |
|
10-31-2008, 10:04 PM | #68 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
If you look back to some of the links I gave, it explains in one particular instance how erich von daniken(author of Chariots of the Gods) paid some mexican children to do some of the "ancient astronaut" stone carvings etc. that he used as evidence. Last edited by Doom; 10-31-2008 at 10:07 PM. |
|
10-31-2008, 11:27 PM | #69 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 121
|
Re: (Whatever!)Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Please see this video part1 and 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1wsLOJ7Tvw please realize that most or all the information that your using to rebuke his claims or facts are based on others information that most likely is a disinformation smear campaign to steer everyone away from the truth of who we and how we came to be as human beings. i've heard tons of things said about sitchin being illuminati and meeting with the vatican. im not saying 100% everything is true but FOR THE RECORD. Nibiru is a real. The ANNUNAKI do exist. They created what is now called the cadueces or entwined serpents ans much much more. you dont have to like sitchin. it doesnt matter. dont sell yourselves short in not believing that the ANNUNAKI exist. who do you think are our archangels? everyone of them are ANNUNAKI. is that a shocker too? what about JESUS? everyone wants proof. mostly everyone is searching outside themselves for the answers when all along all the answers have been inside all of us. its in our consciousness. its all up to yourselves to find it. but looking on a computer and doing "years" of "research" makes you question sitchin? question your own techniques and tools. the truth will always be. Bob Dean said that he was informed that Nibiru's atmosphere is orange/yellow. thats true. seeds of devotion and enlightenment, elias. |
10-31-2008, 11:51 PM | #70 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
There is no time, just as when you look outside the window of a car, things seem to move, but it is only you and your perception that move. We are merely moving along an infinite tapestry and our choice determine where on this tapestry we decide to go next. The only "time" that exists is now. Even though it is hidden from your view, it is also 2000 years ago right now. Just as it is 2000 in the future, right now. Your now just happens to be here instead of there, because you lack the technology to make it otherwise (accept for memory). check out Wilcock's work on the relationship between space/time and time/space. Not to hard to wrap your mind around the basics. Time...is spatially related. Judging by your "conviction" I assume you have more evidence than has been presented so far. I want to believe too, please help me with some more data found elsewhere beyond Sitchen and Dean if you have it. I really want to know! Thanks |
|
11-01-2008, 08:15 AM | #71 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 121
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Judging by your "conviction" I assume you have more evidence than has been presented so far. I want to believe too, please help me with some more data found elsewhere beyond Sitchen and Dean if you have it. I really want to know!
Thanks[/QUOTE] hello Heretic, My data isn't on paper though its well documented by, let's say, third parties. if i say, "Shamanism". what do you think of? natives dancing around a fire? eagle feathers? sometimes you have to learn the ancient techniques that are still available to this day. their taught to anyone who is willing to learn. does that sound strange to you? i'm learning every single second, also. if you check out my blog you'll get an understanding of why i say this. http://heavenlycatalyst144.blogspot.com check out Wilcock's work on the relationship between space/time and time/space. Not to hard to wrap your mind around the basics. Time...is spatially related. "time is spatially related?" i missed that lesson that day. i think i was day dreaming when in class as i usually do. day dreaming is a right brain function. so is creativity. so is the divine feminine energy. have you heard of something called "fluid intelligence?" its when a person can link random things or patterns without having to go though the "order" of "things". kind of like when you get an intuitive feeling about something. so if you can... lets say, jump to get info. then why cant you jump dimensions. everyone does it all the time. they just call it memory. what about day dreaming. big brother calls it "reality engineering". why do you think we've got millions of gifted kids diagnosed with ADD or ADHD. the gov. is trying to keep these gifted people from accessing parts of their brain that do amazing but normal things. space and time is only applied in dense realities like 3rd dimension. their really is no such thing as space and time or time space. of course theirs rules when on this earth and in your body but they all go away when its just your consciousness which really isn't just your consciousness, its consciousness. your the gatekeeper. flouride, gmo's, etc. all to keep the human being from being. being a vegetarian helps also. dont eat anything that feels pain or fear. yeah plants feel a little pain but its not like an animal being slaughtered while still alive and screaming and convulsing in pain. the meat that people eat is filled with that pain and fear or energy. if you eat meat then you are giving yourself free reign for the reptilians. they thrive on those emotions. we are love. if you want to see a graphic documentary about how people get their meat watch this. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...30308142&hl=en have you heard of the Mekaba? its that picture i have on my profile. its also called the chariot for good reason. you can go places. seeds of devotion and enlightenment, visvasa Last edited by Visvasa144; 11-01-2008 at 08:53 AM. |
11-02-2008, 05:09 AM | #72 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 146
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
Sorry bud, already have looked into all that stuff. Doesn't change anything. I understand the science. There are no time travelling ufos. You can throw all the quantum science out there, even being able to prove the possibilty of it doesn't change the realtiy that there are no time travelling ufos. Just because something is possible doesn't mean it must be. BTW david wilcock is one of the last people on earth i'd take advice from. Last edited by Doom; 11-03-2008 at 05:46 AM. |
|
11-02-2008, 10:01 PM | #73 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Now
Posts: 371
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
*shrug*
good times all peace |
11-03-2008, 05:45 PM | #74 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 100
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
Quote:
On the UFO part I can just say this: It is important what we describe as a UFO. |
|
11-03-2008, 06:13 PM | #75 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 398
|
Re: Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate
|
|
|