mojo
17th October 2017, 18:45
Recently, two sources of information posted on the web and debunking the group of UFO callers (summoners) in the LA region has caught my attention. As much as a skeptic myself over their evidence I did not like the way the attacks on them took place. Having been the object of a disinfo campaign made me realize how damaging this form of attack can be. The LA group has value in their efforts because there are such sky anomalies but better efforts on finding the subtle clues needed to be done by them and some in the group still today feel they are induced with special summoning abilities and use that title as a badge which is really just ego imo. There are two at faults, one the group itself for not being more diligent with evidence and proofs and the other attacking/debunking group not doing do diligence with hearing both sides to the story.
Warning: Strong language: if you click and watch for just briefly you will catch the context.
It could easily be another person or group ... Also it does nothing to help prove sky anomalies might exist. Personally witnessed an object that was beyond anything seen before and if others observed these objects it would be easy to class them into the same earthly origin as balloons. The main thing about debunking is using history and evidence to help build a good case and not the people.
9NaexUkJYsk
Warning: Strong language: if you click and watch for just briefly you will catch the context.
It could easily be another person or group ... Also it does nothing to help prove sky anomalies might exist. Personally witnessed an object that was beyond anything seen before and if others observed these objects it would be easy to class them into the same earthly origin as balloons. The main thing about debunking is using history and evidence to help build a good case and not the people.
9NaexUkJYsk