Stop 5G before it's irreversible! [Archive] - Page 4 - The Project Avalon Community Forum

onawah

13th August 2020, 17:14

Online meeting about 5G satellites, August 13
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org5G Space Appeal
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/SqHVAGDll9IZHCjxZzhN4XFkUM2usrXzGZzc78EovB24bFpV0FSw8X9_VsJng4fcH2LLU3PZpqdU32tL2q5t5Y3iz0V-LYJ2HACQzzP7j3DiR2jv7tsbD68m8vfR-XV5zH63Xc5zL-_gGAJOajEGptnDE2o0Ww2GjPSGuB2U_09jOkj_F-ol7Fc6xWZkUSA2CMizAoUOUsVf_xIWu2_2RLTO74vsmsIGrcTLJKW6vgCqs98M0e5d=s0-d-e1-ft#https://cdn.cyberimpact.com/clients/34403/public/d3918c47-f0c9-4539-f962-13b8060e5f32/image/trial_banner_from_shuttercock_image_1_contrast_2_high.jpg?1597169616491
"Dear Friends,

Due to problems with my email marketing service, a great many of you were not receiving these important newsletters about our common future. Therefore I temporarily stopped sending them while I hired a consultant to troubleshoot and fix the problems. This is my first newsletter since June 18. Coincidentally, SpaceX also had problems with its launches and did not send any Starlink satellites into space during that time. The launch of 57 satellites on Friday, August 7, 2020 was SpaceX’s first such launch since June 13.

Arthur

THE CURRENT SITUATION IN SPACE

SpaceX

The launch of 57 more satellites by SpaceX in the early morning of Friday, August 7, at 1:12 AM EDT, has brought the number of SpaceX’s “Starlink” satellites orbiting in the Earth’s ionosphere up to 595.

Although this was the first launch since June 13, SpaceX has not been idle during this time. It has built additional ground stations and has received permission from the Federal Communications Commission to operate (so far) 40 ground stations, scattered throughout the United States. It has signed up customers to begin “beta testing” of the satellites that are already in orbit. Beta testing will occur initially, says SpaceX, with customers who live between 44 and 52 degrees latitude in the northern U.S. and southern Canada. SpaceX plans to begin the testing sometime in September.

As I reported in a previous newsletter, SpaceX’s launch of April 22, which brought the number of its satellites up to 420, was accompanied by reports of heart palpitations from far and wide, including from yours truly. I again felt strong heart palpitations that began early in the morning on August 7. Actually I began to experience a feeling of oppression Thursday night about two hours before the launch time. Please contact me if you have been having heart palpitations since Friday’s launch.

OneWeb

OneWeb, which is based in the UK, and which had declared bankruptcy in March, has been bailed out to the tune of one billion dollars by the UK government and Indian telecommunications company Bharti Global. And on May 26, 2020, OneWeb applied to the FCC for permission to compete on an equal footing with SpaceX by launching 47,844 satellites into the ionosphere.

Although OneWeb’s offices are in the UK, none of its Directors live there. Its CEO, Adrián Steckel, is Mexican, and the rest of its Directors live in the U.S., Germany, Israel and Mexico. Its major stockholders are Qualcomm (Singapore), SoftBank Group (Japan), and 1110 Ventures (U.S.).

Amazon

On July 29, 2020, the FCC granted Amazon’s application to launch 3,236 satellites into the ionosphere. Like the satellites of SpaceX and OneWeb, Amazon’s satellites will operate at millimeter wave frequencies and use phased array technology to cover the Earth with focused beams of radiation enabling customers to access the Internet from anywhere on Earth, on land or ocean.

The satellites of SpaceX, OneWeb and Amazon alone, if they are all launched, will total, together, about 92,000 satellites. If you add in Iridium and Globalstar, which are already operating small constellations, and the plans of Facebook, Link, Canadian companies Kepler and Telesat, the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation, Russia’s Roscosmos, and other competitors, there could soon be 100,000 satellites orbiting in the ionosphere.

“But will you wake for pity’s sake”*

The out-of-control satellite industry is one of the stupidest things humankind has ever created. It treats the life-giving envelope of our atmosphere as if we don’t depend on it. It poses an immediate threat to life on Earth, in so many ways.

The 100,000 planned 5G satellites, each with a designed lifespan of 5 to 10 years, must be constantly de-orbited and replaced. This means that at least 10,000 satellites will have to be launched every year, forever into the future. If an average of 50 satellites can be launched on each rocket, that’s 200 rocket launches per year, just to maintain the satellites used for cell phones and Internet. And it means the de-orbiting of 10,000 worn out satellites per year, burning them up in the atmosphere and turning them into toxic dust and smoke. And that’s not counting the ever-increasing numbers of weather, research, tracking, monitoring, surveillance, military, and other kinds of satellites and missiles being launched in what will soon be a parade of rockets burning prodigious quantities of fossil fuels, punching holes in our atmosphere on a daily basis, and treating the source of all life as Earth’s largest garbage pit.

Martin Ross of the Aerospace Corporation and other researchers have been modeling the effects of daily rocket launches on ozone and global temperatures. Rocket exhaust, depending on the type of fuel used, may contain chlorine and/or oxides of nitrogen, hydrogen, and/or aluminum, all of which destroy ozone. SpaceX’s kerosene-fueled rockets deposit enormous amounts of black soot into the stratosphere, where it accumulates, absorbing solar radiation and warming the stratosphere. The warming of the stratosphere accelerates the chemical reactions that destroy ozone.

Most rockets are launched from the northern hemisphere. And the winter and spring of 2020 saw the largest and longest-lasting Arctic ozone hole in history. Ozone-watchers did not know what caused it, but they were not communicating with the scientists who are studying rocket exhaust. Our world is full of specialists, deaf and blind to other specialties, collectively asleep and marching toward oblivion.

Atmospheric physicists do not study astronomy. Astronomers do not study electricity. Electricians do not study biology. Medical doctors do not study acupuncture. Doctors of oriental medicine do not study atmospheric physics. But the universe is not fragmented, it is a whole, and our culture has forgotten what that is, to its peril and to the peril of everything alive.

The ionosphere is a source of high voltage that controls the electric circuitry of the biosphere and everything in it, including the fine-tuned circuitry of every human, every animal, every tree, and every fish. If we do not immediately stop the destruction of our fragile blanket of electrified air, upon which we depend for growth, healing, and life itself, climate change and ozone destruction may not matter. Beta testing begins in September.

NATIONAL MEETING ABOUT SATELLITES, AUGUST 13

On Thursday, August 13, 2020, from 7 to 9 PM EDT (2300 to 0100 UTC), Americans for Responsible Technology will host a meeting about the 5G satellites on Zoom that will be simulcast on Facebook. In the first hour, four presenters will speak for 15 minutes each:

Ben Levi, technology consultant, will summarize the current satellite situation. Where are we now, and what is forecast over the next few years?

Joe Sandri has a law degree and has training and experience in radiofrequency engineering. He will describe how the satellites work. How will a typical 5G transmission use the satellites? What kinds of earth stations will be required?

Arthur Firstenberg will talk about the impact of the satellites on people and the environment. How will the electrical environment of the earth be altered by constant transmission of 5G signals?

Julian Gresser, attorney, will address what is being done legally to stop this. What right does the FCC or any other agency have to authorize the use of space for private commercial interests? What are the legal and ethical principles involved?

The second hour of the meeting will consist of a discussion among the presenters, followed by questions from the online audience, which will include members of the press.

Attend by Zoom (limited space). Participants must register in advance: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZwkdeqoqjIiGNx6dqXjti7HrZHqle3LNwrH

Watch on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/1176845649355076

CORONAVIRUS’S HIDDEN THREAT

When SpaceX begins its beta testing in the northern United States and southern Canada later this summer, the single biggest obstacle to recognizing its effects on humans will be COVID-19. Because no matter how many people sicken or die in that part of the world, it will be blamed on the coronavirus.

As I pointed out in a previous newsletter, the pandemic began with 5G. 5G came to Wuhan shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. 5G came to New York City streetlamps shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. COVID-19 deprives the blood of oxygen, while radio waves deprive the cells of oxygen. COVID-19, alone, is just a respiratory virus like the common cold. But together with 5G, it is deadly. To deal with COVID-19 effectively, society must first recognize the harm done to the body by radio waves. 5G is radio waves on steroids.
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/ZrJ_pjL8DpuS3lBiiaqXdMEiReBtlNnVC8qdz2Qnx515H01Q4VsKq002NVwX50VuxrWpKAhv45U9ow5vMFpvMTaPOUDpN7SmWnYO v9sH0h-RrVyFRY-9Fl6y1tAVqa0zTRl9Zy14wHJxx7L1phnB_pSGN6ouc9h_GYNualWzu1nTMicd4uwBcGzIPpjOr2wOKxU45KsEtg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://cdn.cyberimpact.com/clients/34403/public/d3918c47-f0c9-4539-f962-13b8060e5f32/image/water_tank_water_dies.jpg?1597164813890

This worker’s death was not caused by hot weather, as was reported by the media

Instead of acknowledging the harm from radio waves, society is tearing its fabric apart by instituting measures that are protecting no one and are instead sickening and killing people. I will mention just one of those measures here: facial masks.

As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”

I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.

Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”
Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”
Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”
Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”
Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.”
Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”
Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”
Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”
Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes -- two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask.

Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them.

“We are living in an atmosphere of permanent illness, of meaningless separation,” writes Benjamin Cherry in the Summer 2020 issue of New View magazine. A separation that is destroying lives, souls, and nature.
_____________
* from Christopher Fry, A Sleep of Prisoners, 1951.

Arthur Firstenberg

August 11, 2020 "

Hughe

15th August 2020, 12:31

Biograd in Croatia adopts 5G moratorium

The City Council of Biograd, a small town on the Adriatic coast and popular tourist summer yacht destination, near the old town of Zadar, has voted to ban the implementation of 5G until independent scientific research proves that the technology has no harmful health and environmental effects. After Hvar, this is the second Croatian tourist town to take the same decision.

The news was announced on Monday, 10 August 2020, by a regional newspaper, Zadarski list:
https://www.zadarskilist.hr/clanci/10082020/2-elektronicka-sjednica-grad-biograd-zabranio-uvodenje-5g-tehnologije-dok-se-ne?fbclid=IwAR3CDpX3AXfHgB7r5K3ev0QNgVDz4hb442Lw482gObuh966huFW0l1D0q50

onawah

18th August 2020, 21:45

5G Satellite Lawsuit Against the FCC
Email update today from: 5G Crisis report@5gcrisis.com via gmail.mcsv.net
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/py_-eVyj_eZ3RwuCpdJW_tedoVkuVTUpI120JkRHWg-fmcLez7sB7SEhApTY7ihJCtBWHrM2R15Yb79X-xU3gJ1teZzrfBvDnVoJPAAG9JJeRmoUDGYVcFidSOoOVRBYhV0FogxAl8jlKmMAym5nl7YCo5moKQ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b/images/eda3bb5f-9584-44a3-a56b-c6b4fd75d76b.png
8/18/20

"Last week we hosted an international Zoom call to highlight the massive proliferation of 5G satellites in space. Our guest speakers were Ben Levi, Joe Sandri, Arthur Firstenberg and Julian Gresser.

If you weren’t able to join the call, you can now watch the video here.

Julian Gresser, a former Harvard and MIT law professor, is organizing the legal challenge to the FCC regarding its qualifications, experience and legal basis for authorizing the exploitation of space for private gain. We are supporting Julian and his team of legal, business and scientific experts to carry out this critical mission, and we hope you will join us.

This Take Action Tuesday, we’re asking you to make whatever donation you possibly can to support the efforts of Julian Gresser and the Healthy Heavens Trust Initiative and to share this message with others.

The Trust's co-sponsors, the Citizens for Health Education Foundation (CHEF) and the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy (NISLAPP) are 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations, so all your donations are tax-deductible charitable contributions."

Qh8tIScM2a0

onawah

23rd August 2020, 02:09

Epoch Times Covers CHD Case Against FCC, Quoting Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Petitioners
By Conan Milner, Epoch Times
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org/weeklywrapupweeklywrapupchdvfacebookplandemicgard?wvpId=6e43f36e-0dfe-4224-991b-cf84941660dc
https://www.theepochtimes.com/lawsuit-challenges-fcc-wireless-safety-standards_3458350.html?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c4b8e232-2fa3-4416-a49b-c368044c395d

"The case challenges the FCC to reconsider its wireless health and safety guidelines that have been in place since 1996."We know now, from thousands and thousands of peer-reviewed published studies, that microwave radiation injures the human body and human cells at a tiny fraction of what it takes to raise the temperature of your body," Kennedy said. "It shows a grim inventory of injuries connected to Wi-Fi, including oxidative stress, sperm and testicular damage, cell damage, DNA damage, and neuropsychiatric damage. The neuropsychiatric damage can be so powerful that it can be read almost immediately on EEGs in children, and those effects do not disappear after you withdraw the radiation."But you’re not likely to hear these details of this unsettled science in the mainstream media. Kennedy said one of the most frustrating issues in getting the public to understand the harms related to RF radiation is the powerful influence the wireless industry has in silencing the story. In a world where media companies are often intimately tied to big telecom companies that have a stake in the 5G rollout, such stories are bad for business. Facebook, in particular, admits to censoring criticism of 5G."

ExomatrixTV

23rd August 2020, 12:55

So when you combine:

01. Rockefeller PDF Document Lockstep (https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Annual-Report-2010-1.pdf) 2010
02. Rockefeller Foundation PDF (http://tinyurl.com/Rockefeller-Foundation-PDF2020) ID2020
03. World Economic Forum #Agenda2030 (https://www.weforum.org/strategic-intelligence)
04. Bill Gates (http://tinyurl.com/BillGatesTyranny) and his "Event 201 (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/)" exercise in Fall 2019
05. "The Great Reset (http://tinyurl.com/The-Great-Reset-Cover-Up)"
06. Club of Rome "Planetary Emergency Plan (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111849-Club-of-Rome-PLANETARY-EMERGENCY-PLAN)"
07. "Global Governance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_governance)" run by unelected (psychopathic) Technocrats (http://Technocracy.News) using advanced A.I. Algorithms!
08. 5G - Mass A.I. Surveillance Smart Grid (http://tinyurl.com/Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible) (The Big Elephant in The Room!).

All in plain sight ... meanwhile almost all Mainstream Media refuses to ask the hard questions!

cheers,
John Kuhles

ExomatrixTV

23rd August 2020, 14:31

Bogus "5G = virus" narrative & Dis-info memes exposed!

⚠️ In 2017 & 2018 before the mass C0VlD HYSTERIA ... I stated multiple times ON RECORD: That millions of new #5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/5g?__eep__=6) Cell Towers & Smartphones could have an impact when we have a "common cold" or "common flu" ... I NEVER said nor claimed "5G = virus" ... Vast majority of our Stop5G Fb Group members neither!

🌐 I also stated that the increase of more and more Erratic Pulsed Microwaves (Non-Native EMFs) Cumulative Radiation everywhere like: 4G WiFi & 5G AFFECTS our >> immune system << as it is shown in Declassified Navy Documents calling it "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" + 1000s other PubMed Peer Reviewed #Science2Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/science2stop5g?__eep__=6) Scientific publications like Dr. Martin Pall ... This evidence is NEVER allowed to be discussed in ANY mainstream media!

⚠️ This very important symptoms list has similarities with "flu-like symptoms" so WHY does the Mass Mainstream Media ONLY focus on the BOGUS "5G = virus narrative" false assumption we suppose to "agree" with? ... Which is an obvious LIE & Straw-man Argument Fallacy Tactic!

🤔 How many "5G = Virus Memes" are NOT made by real #Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/stop5g?__eep__=6) Activists but by those who GAIN to flood social media with DIS-INFO? Then use it to demonize ANYONE discussing 5G + Flu connection we already discussed in 2017 & 2018 ... What if they knew in advance 5G will make ALL common flu & common cold more dangerous for the weak, the elderly and those having multiple other conditions? ... If so, THAT explains the FRAMING of Stop5G Activists to make us go silent (mass censorship).

🦋 Now you know WHY Mainstream Media never allowed a real uncensored (live) debate between Pro 5G vs Stop5G Activists ever last 4 years! ... They FEAR US being treated fair & with 100% transparency for all to see.

If you have ANY EVIDENCE that last 4 years Mainstream Media allowed an honest real open debate where a summary does 100% justice what we stand for ... Feel free to share that evidence here in comments. If you are NOT able to do that ... does that, at least, make you think & question how the masses are conditioned in a very narrow (corporate approved) narrative?

John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

Eric J (Viking)

23rd August 2020, 20:28

I think this belongs here...

OOKLA 5G MAP (SEE WHERE YOU LIVE IF YOU WILL BE ZAPPED BY 5G - IT WILL KILL YOU)
OOKLA 5G MAP™

The interactive Ookla 5G Map tracks 5G rollouts in cities across the globe. Updated weekly from verified public sources and Ookla data, you can follow operators' newest 5G networks on @Ookla5GMap.

https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map

Viking

onawah

26th August 2020, 20:54

A Primer for Corrupt Governments: How to Implement 5G Wireless Technology Against the Wishes of Your Population
By Claire Edwards
Global Research, June 03, 2019
https://www.globalresearch.ca/primer-governments-how-implement-5g-against-wishes-your-population/5679368

(This may have been posted already, but probably merits a re-post. )

"Spare a thought for all the governments wanting to cash in on the multi-trillion-dollar bonanza of the fifth generation of wireless technology or 5G while pacifying the half of their population who are anxious about its dire health and environmental consequences and keeping in ignorance the other half of the population who do not yet oppose its introduction because they are uninformed about its dangers.

Various governments have adopted different strategies to tackle this challenge, any of which may serve as a template for other governments to use. Let us take some instructive examples from Austria, France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Governments that have been dilatory in availing themselves of the surveillance and control potential of 5G to quash dissent may wish to choose a strategy from the following list that they feel is most compatible with the national character and situation of their country and therefore most likely to meet their need for a smooth and rapid 5G rollout.

Austria: brute force and public ignorance

The most advisable strategy for any cautious government is to ensure that the population remains uninformed of the dangers of 5G. This is relatively simple to achieve by using brute force to rapidly sign into law legislation forcing the entire population to accept “smart” meters with no possibility of refusal, as the Austrian government did in 2018, and issuing a Gesteznovelle or amendment to a law allowing 5G antennas to be installed on all public buildings, including nurseries, kindergartens and schools. This results in a quick 5G rollout, which can then be portrayed as a triumph in the race to digitalization and its claimed benefits of more jobs, faster downloads, low latency, fourth industrial revolution, core cloud, cutting edge technology, or any other similarly hyperbolic promotional rhetoric designed to con the public (or, in PR language, “capture the public imagination”).

Complicity with the media conveniently ensures that no whisper of the dangers inherent in a new and untested technology penetrates the public sphere. The population remains in ignorance, is not given the option to refuse 5G infrastructure and is propagandized to believe that their country is at the forefront of the modern age. This strategy has much to recommend it and avoids all controversy, long-winded debate, troublesome negotiations, annoying delays and unnecessary costs. Well done, Austria, for demonstrating how easy the 5G rollout can be when such a simple and highly effective strategy is adopted!

France: trickery and opportunism

France offers two possible strategies for rolling out 5G, each of which has great potential. France’s majority state-owned ENEDIS is steamrolling the French public with “smart” meters (called “Linky”) for the 5G Internet of Things, despite opposition from 71% of the population. Since 1884, electric meters belong to the municipalities of France, 906 of which, out of a total of 35,498 (2.5%) are refusing “smart” meters, a number that is constantly rising. The French population recognizes that “smart” meters are being imposed without their consent, with many complaints of trickery used by ENEDIS subcontractors, including some where the gendarmerie had to intervene to protect the citizenry.

If stealth and trickery should fail, another possibility is to take advantage of a national tragedy to impose 5G surreptitiously. While the nation is preoccupied mourning the loss of a much-loved historical monument, oligarchs – including those with close ties to telecommunications companies – have a whip round involving hundreds of millions of euros each to reconstruct rather than restore, your lawmakers announce the suspension of regulations regarding the protection of a national and world heritage site, and declare the legitimacy of rebuilding according to “the techniques and challenges of our era”. Any dissent expressed by historical experts or architects about the origins of the fire or the manner of rebuilding the monument is suppressed.

The public discovers only later that the ground on which the monument stood had already been subject to advance privatization plans before the terrible tragedyof its destruction and hey presto!, it can be rebuilt complete with modern technology suitable for the 5G rollout, especially appropriate and convenient given its central location as the “point zero” of France, from which all distances in the country are calculated.

Since France´s 5G rollout strategy is not yet complete, the above scenario remains at the level of speculation; only time will tell if indeed this strategy turns out to be the one employed. Whatever the case, it would have been a strong contender for most inventive strategy had it not been a longstanding and now rather tired strategy of disaster capitalism, these days greatly facilitated by the advent of directed energy weapons.

Switzerland: intricacies of the exclusion clause and amended subparagraph

Switzerland´s public servants are to be commended for demonstrating a mental dexterity that has enabled them to solve the conundrum of introducing 5G while facing an educated and informed citizenry. It has provided a useful template for the benefit of similarly unfortunate governments. Switzerland´s approach involves the devious use of exclusion clauses and innocent-looking subparagraphs.

Switzerland follows the exposure levels set out in the so-called safety guidelines of the so-called International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (more about these “guidelines” and ICNIRP later). The problem for the Swiss government is that Switzerland has precautionary exposure levels for single transmitters (base stations) that are 10 times lower than the ICNIRP levels.

Having gone ahead and auctioned the available spectrum in the 700 MHz and 3.5 GHz bands in February 2019, netting US$380 million, the Swiss government was faced with the challenge of enabling the use of the spectrum it had sold by raising limits without alerting the public.

As the public and cantonal lawmakers gradually started to grasp the scale of the threat from the completely untested 5G, the federal government’s dilemma grew. First came a people´s petition to force a parliamentary debate on 5G signed by 56,000 Swiss, then the cantons of Vaud, Jura and Geneva adopted moratoria on the 5G rollout. These were closely followed by Neuchâtel, which posed a series of questions to the federal government regarding the safety of 5G technology.

Cantonal lawmakers and Swiss citizens were outraged when the majority state-owned Swisscom defied the opposition to 5G by using existing antennas installed for previous generations of wireless technology to impose 5G on 102 locations in Switzerland. They will doubtless be further outraged when they learn that Swisscom has known about the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic radiation since at least 2004, when it filed a patent on a method and system for reducing electro smog in wireless local networks. This reveals that Swisscom has rolled out 5G on the Swiss population in full knowledge of its ability to cause damage to DNA and increase cancer risk.

Wireless Radiation: Stop the 5G Network on Earth and in Space, Devastating Impacts on Health and the Environment
On 17 April, the federal government made its move to stymie the public opposition while enabling the 5G rollout. This constitutes a veritable primer on conning the public. It published a document modifying its 1999/2016 ordinance on protection against non-ionizing radiation (NIR), with effect from 1 June 2019. The beauty of this is that an ordinance cannot be challenged by a people´s referendum. The accompanying report helpfully explains the purpose and operation of the modifications.

Given that more than half the Swiss population considers the radiation emitted by mobile phone antennas to be dangerous or rather dangerous (Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS), Omnibus 2011, 2015), the modifications to the ordinance have two significant purposes: (1) to establish a system of monitoring public exposure to NIR (sect. 4.1.1) in accordance with the Aarhus Convention, which obliges ratifying states to inform the public about pollutants and their effects on people and the environment, and (2) to fill the gaps in regulation that impede the deployment of 5G (sect. 2).

Point 1, the monitoring system, sounds promising until we are told later on in the report that the Federal Office for the Environment (OFEV) would be tasked with informing the public periodically of the extent of their exposure to NIR and the state of the science on the effects of NIR, but that no coordination with the Federal Office of Public Safety would be required since “no biological marker or modification of a biological marker presenting a link with NIR or its effects on health has been identified to date [sic]” (sect. 4.1.1).

The great advantage of this strategy, we are told, is that the public would thereby be informed “in an objective manner about its exposure to NIR and its origin, and the current margin as compared to the limits set out in the ordinance, which would contribute to taking the passion out of the debate and the perception of risk”. And most satisfyingly, OFEV would always be in a position to justify to the public why the current exposure limits were in line with science and testing (sect. 4.1.2). In other words, it would be a closed circle and no examination of the real health and environmental dangers of NIR would be possible.

Point 2 is equally a master-stroke, for filling in the gaps in regulations that impede the deployment of 5G turns out to mean that the modified ordinance should include a principle of evaluation of “beam-forming” antennas and that “mobile phone antennas that emit during less than 800 hours per annum” should be exempted from the requirement to “respect the preventative exposure limits” (sect. 2).

This sleight of hand enables the federal government to exclude all 5G antennas from regulation, since they are all beam-forming and, if their emissions are calculated on the basis of their “directionality”, as implied by the chap. 62, additional subpara. 6, which states that “[The term] beam-forming antennas is intended to mean the radiating direction or the antenna pattern is adjusted automatically at short intervals”, it appears that it could be not the entirety of the emissions that would be subject to calculation, but solely each direction of emission. 800 hours would permit two months of emissions per annum per stationary antenna, but if each degree of emission of, for example, 180 degrees of movement of a directional antenna were to be permitted 800 hours, then no 5G antenna, all of which are directional, could exceed 800 hours of emissions and therefore none would come within the ambit of the modified ordinance.

Et voilà! As if by magic, the Swiss federal government checkmates the Swiss people and their cantonal governments to enable 5G!

It is to be noted here that, thanks to the diligence of Swiss NGO Gigaherz, Swiss telephone companies have already been caught in the act of illegally irradiating the Swiss people, when antennas hidden under manhole covers were found in 2018 to be transmitting way in excess of their permitted limits.

Who would know if the millions of beam-forming antennas throughout Switzerland were exceeding the permitted exposure limits or transmitting in excess of 800 hours? Would anyone want to risk exposure by taking up position within their vicinity, given that the new beam-forming antennas are “especially used with the high frequencies auctioned in early 2019” (sect. 4.3)?

No wonder Switzerland is famous for its high-class and high-tech products! Its skill and meticulousness in drafting such a Byzantine 5G rollout strategy trumps all!

United Kingdom: strict legalism and authoritative assertions

The United Kingdom can always be relied upon for its professed adherence to the rule of law. Thus enquirers as to the safety of 5G, both members of the public and parliamentarians, are treated to lengthy disquisitions on the reliability of the so-called science produced by the various official bodies responsible for assuring the public that they are duly protected from electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As in the popular British children´s party-game, this may be termed a “pass-the-parcel” strategy and is greatly facilitated by the existence of a large number of organizations with acronyms that may be conveniently juggled as needed.

Answers to questions in parliament or from the public are drafted along the following lines: Public Health England relies on AGNIR [if this body has unfortunately been disbanded due to allegations of conflict of interest, incompetence, lack of qualified experts, falsified science or any other reason, the name of another body such as ICNIRP or SCENIHR may be substituted here] to supply the scientific evidence showing the safety of wireless telecommunications technologies since [add appropriate date]. The World Health Organization endorses the safety guidelines set forth by [name of body] in setting its EMR safety guidelines. Should Public Health England be made aware of any changes in the science, it will amend its policies accordingly.

It may easily be seen that the UK strategy is an astute one since it serves simultaneously to impress and mystify, for no one has any clue as to the meaning of the various acronyms or the tainted reputations of the various bodies named, especially when they hail from another country. Such is the case, for example, with the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection or ICNIRP, which is in reality just a little club of male scientists in Germany that appoints its own members without supervision or consultation with anyone and mysteriously receives funding from, and is housed by, the German government, conveniently in the same building with the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection. Nor would any UK citizen be likely to wonder how it came to be that the little club´s guidelines were adopted and endorsed not only by the UN´s World Health Organization, but also by its International Telecommunication Union.

Great work, United Kingdom! Deceiving the public while sounding sincere and trustworthy is quite an achievement. A note of caution, though, for other governments considering employing a similar strategy: it does necessitate a certain level of gullibility among the general public and is therefore unlikely to be effective in the case of populations already skeptical about government pronouncements.

United States: big spending by lobbyists to enable capture of government agencies

As may be expected of the United States, the preferred 5G rollout strategy involves money and muscle. The imposition of 5G without public consent or consultation was made possible long in advance by regulatory capture by industry, which ensured that laws were changed to prohibit injury to health and environmental damage being taken into account to prevent or hinder the rollout of 5G.

President Clinton signed into law the 1996 Telecommunications Act, section 704 of which states that no health or environmental concern can interfere with the placement of telecom equipment such as cell towers and antennas. Wireless facilities have been made a permitted use in all public rights-of-way, with the intention of locating them directly in front of homes and businesses and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with babies. Public notice requirements and public hearings have been eliminated. Local authorities are prohibited from taking into consideration testimony from scientific experts. For example, local governments are prohibited from regulating wireless technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation”, and courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.

Combined with corporate control of the media, preferably by telecommunications companies, and manipulation of lawmakers by armies of highly paid lobbyists, the strategy of regulatory capture is much to be admired, since – barring the appearance of a lawmaker with integrity and the existence of alternative media – it becomes almost impossible for the public to learn that 5G was never tested for health or safety and poses an existential threat to the entire planet.

In a country such as the US that believes itself a bastion of freedom, the public are unlikely to find plausible the idea that they are being hoodwinked in this way over such a dangerous technology and the 5G rollout may therefore be expected to proceed relatively unhindered. Should any information on the adverse effects of 5G leak out, recourse may be made to the oft-used and handy “blame-it-on-the-Russians” narrative. It should be noted, however, that this strategy requires considerable advance planning and the easy availability of funds sufficient to make your point of view the only one visible to lawmakers. It will therefore not be within the means of all countries. Nevertheless, this one has to qualify for the prize in the “heavy-handed but effective” category.

International aid and assistance

Implementation of the above strategies is likely to be facilitated by recourse to the assistance of international organizations. If the aim is to impose a global telecommunications technology capable of “blanketing” the Earth, as stated in the literature on 5G, especially one involving transmissions by satellites, it would be indispensable to enlist the aid of the United Nations. An appropriate Secretary-General would have to be appointed, preferably someone benefitting from a professional background as an electrical engineer and physicist. Timing here is all, for such an opportunity arises only once every eight years.

Should 5G proponents be successful in this, they would have struck gold, for a UN Secretary-General can guide all of the organization´s activities in the desired direction, ensuring that 5G deployment feeds into the implementation of all treaties and conventions and thus becomes seen as a sine qua non in all resulting policy-making activities.

The UN Secretary-General also has the prerogative of “spontaneously” appointing, for example, an international Panel on Digital Cooperation, which could include all the international proponents of 5G in one go, while conveniently excluding any difficult people such as scientists or physicians knowledgeable about the deleterious biological effects of EMR. The Panel´s terms of reference would want to ensure its separation from the usual work of the UN, again obviating time-wasting questions that might be posed by UN officials or other concerned experts. The members of the Panel would automatically gain access to all UN member states, thereby profiting from the opportunity of one-sidedly convincing them of the benefits of 5G while conveniently failing to mention any possible downsides to the technology.

Should anyone have the temerity to raise objections to the UN’s failure to even mention the word “health” in the context of its rush to embrace 5G in all its programs and to assist in its imposition on every inch of the planet as well as in space, the cooperation agreement between Interpol and the UN’s International Telecommunication Union may be usefully invoked to intimidate such a person as a potential cybercriminal.

The generally favorable worldwide public view of UN activities combined with universal ignorance about those activities and their purposes makes seeking such international assistance distinctly advantageous.

A smorgasbord of opportunities for rolling out 5G

I hope it is clear by now to all the governments reading this primer on the world´s most effective 5G rollout strategies that they have a smorgasbord of opportunities and support available to them for implementing 5G. Excuses regarding opposition from namby-pamby scientists and physicians across the world complaining about the lack of health and safety testing of 5G, citing the tens of thousands of studies that demonstrate the biological effects of EMR, or calling 5G the stupidest idea in the history of the world will not be tolerated.

Nor will excuses regarding pockets of opposition from nationals of your countries who cite phenomenal rises in all the major diseases of civilization since the advent of wireless technology and smartphones, plus ADHD, autism, suicides, depression, neurological diseases, and catastrophic decreases in fertility across the planet, as well as major declines in insect populations.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Screen-Shot-2019-06-03-at-10.39.28-PM.png
5G IS A GOOD THING BECAUSE WE SAY SO AND YOU WILL DO AS YOU HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED OR LIVE TO REGRET IT WHEN WE CONTROL EVERYTHING

Signed:

Sophia

pp. A.I.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc."

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Claire warned the Secretary-General about the dangers of 5G during a meeting with UN staff in May 2018, calling for a halt to its rollout at UN duty stations. She part-authored, designed, administered the 30 language versions, and edited the entirety of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org) and vigorously campaigned to promote it throughout 2019. In January 2020, she severed connection with the Appeal when its administrator, Arthur Firstenberg, joined forces with a third-party group, stop5ginternational, which brought itself into disrepute at its foundation by associating with the Club of Rome/Club of Budapest eugenicist movement. She is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Claire Edwards, Global Research, 2019

Anna70

27th August 2020, 00:18

Hello all,

Dr Sarah Myhill has compiled a huge list of links to medical reports and other sources of information related to 5G on her website (https://drmyhill.co.uk/wiki/5G_%E2%80%93_the_WHAT_the_WHY_and_the_HOW), which I feel I have to share here, in case it contains useful information that may be new to any of the group members. Though I see that there is a wealth of articles here already!

Hughe

27th August 2020, 22:11

CLAIRE EDWARDS is with us once again via a livestream. In this presentation she will present and share with us a very speciel document which she calls a GROUNDBREAKING document, with major revelations about what is really going on on our planet right now. Claire Edwards is a former United Nations Staffer in Vienna and Editor and Co-author of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.

Download the document here:

DOWNLOAD (http://ageoftruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/INVESTIGATIVE-REPORT-ON-THE-COVID-19-PANDEMIC-AND-ITS-RELATIONSHIP-TO-SARS-COV-2-AND-OTHER-FACTORS.pdf)

Here is a description of the presentation from Claire:

WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON?

Claire Edwards will present a document drawn up by a group of experts that comprehensively explains what is happening on our planet right now and why. It is also a self-help manual for a situation unprecedented in human history.

Bill Ryan

27th August 2020, 22:26

norman

28th August 2020, 05:37

Here's the video, streamed live 13 hours ago:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8FF2Id_lLc

Here's a cleaned up and trimmed ( chopped out the 10 minute break and other tweaks) AUDIO version:

Play or download
MP3
https://app.box.com/s/xlwep1a9435v4velkvpjaz6302mhjn5d

onawah

29th August 2020, 05:04

Trump’s Campaign Revitalized His Proposal to Nationalize 5G
AUGUST 28, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/proposal-to-nationalize-5g-revitalized/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=d2ce4134-97a8-4be6-901d-cd2864f0d378

By Dafna Tachover, CHD’s Director of 5G & Wireless Harms Project

"President Trump’s campaign is reviving its proposal to nationalize 5G, which means that the government will build 5G “small cell” infrastructure and rent access to wireless carriers. Trump first suggested the plan in early 2018, but it met with strong resistance from the FCC, the telecom industry and Congress. The plan was dropped shortly thereafter, and the Air Force official who authored it was removed from the National Security Council and left the White House.

Several rationales have been used to justify the plan, including the alleged need to win the race to 5G over China; establish a national high-speed wireless internet network; provide rural America a breakthrough in quality of life and economic growth; and promote the US economy by building a massive infrastructure just like the buildout of the national highway system in the 1950s.

However, when the main concern regarding China is national security and providing a secure network, promoting 5G as a tool to beat China and address cyberespionage seems counterproductive, as the main problem with wireless networks is, in fact, cybersecurity. Wireless networks can be easily hacked. A better solution is to provide fiber optics to the home.

Fiber optic infrastructure has been deployed in many rural areas across the country and has already been paid for by taxpayers. Nevertheless, in many cases the fiber optic network hasn’t been connected to the homes; instead it has been used to connect cell towers.

Fiber optic infrastructure would provide a safer, faster and healthier solution. 5G has been promoted as an economic booster, and it is supposed to be an infrastructure for the Internet of Things, driverless cars and “smart cities.” However, the voices within the telecom industry that consider the 5G hype to be false are growing and some even say that it is perhaps “a scam perpetrated by an industry desperate for growth.”

One thing is certain: the deployment of 800,000 5G “small cell” antennas near homes and interconnecting 50 billion more radiation-emitting devices, as this current plan dictates, is going to result in a health crisis. In fact, widespread sickness already exists. Ignoring the evidence is merely going to increase the size of the problem."

ExomatrixTV

4th September 2020, 10:20

Massive Predicted Effects of #5G in the Context of Safety Guideline Failures:

Massive Predicted Effects of 5G

Professor Emeritus Martin Pall

Massive Predicted Effects of 5G in the Context of Safety Guideline Failures:

Very High-Level VGCC Sensitivity to Low-Intensity EMFs and Especially to Pulsations Feb. 25, 2020

The voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) protein molecule contains a four domain structure with each domain carrying an alpha helix, each designated an S4 helix, containing 5 positive charges. Those four charged alpha helixes act together as what is called the voltage sensor, the structure that responds to electrical changes across the plasma membrane to open the channel. It has been shown that not only 4 distinct types of VGCCs, but also a voltage gated sodium channel, potassium channel and chloride channel are all activated by low intensity EMFs of various frequencies, suggesting that the EMFs act on the voltage sensor. In plants, EMFs apparently act via activation of some other channels, known as TPC channels, which also contain a similar voltage sensor. The structure and location of the voltage sensor and two laws of physics, Coulomb’s law and Ohm’s law, predict that the EMF forces on the voltage sensor are stunningly strong, approximately 7.2 million times stronger than the forces on singly electrically charged groups in the aqueous parts of our cells and bodies. This explains why the voltage sensor is the main direct target of the EMFs. The voltage-gated sodium, potassium and chloride channels apparently play only minor roles in producing EMF effects, so that to a first approximation, effects can be explained as being predominantly from VGCC activation and consequent increases in intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i. This falsifies the industry claim that there are only thermal effects can occur. The VGCC mechanism has been widely accepted in the scientific community as shown be the 247 citations of my first 2013 EMF paper (Google Scholar) and by my 58 different invited professional talks on this topic.

Large numbers of non-thermal pathophysiological EMF effects can be explained through the action of VGCC activation as produced by two different pathways of action shown in Fig. 1 below: the calcium signaling pathway and the peroxynitrite/free radical/oxidative stress/inflammation pathway. These include are 9 types of effects produced from microwave frequency non-thermal effects as shown in from 9 to 38 different reviews: Lowered male and female fertility; increased neurological/neuropsychiatric effects; 3 types of effects on cellular DNA; endocrine (hormonal) effects; increased apoptosis (programmed cell death); cardiac effects on the electrical control of the heart; oxidative stress/free radical damage; excessive [Ca2+]i; cancer.

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1021/7291/files/Screen_Shot_2020-02-27_at_11.18.24_AM_large.png?v=1582831165

ICNIRP, EU, UK and other “safety guidelines” are all based on average intensities over a 6 minute period, with allowable exposures set by SAR, a measure of heating. Predictions of these safety guidelines have been tested by 8 different highly repeated types of studies and each of these 8 shows that the safety guideline fail and fail massively. Modulating pulsations, nanosecond pulses and paired nanosecond pulses of identical polarity each produce large effects that the safety guidelines claim cannot be produced. These pulsation effects are of high relevance to 5G because 5G is designed to be very highly pulsed in order to carry vast amounts of information per second because it is the pulsations that carry the information. Other types of evidence showing that the safety guidelines do not predict biological effects include the calcium channel blocker studies which show that low-intensity EMF exposures produce effects through VGCC activation rather than by heating, the many reviews showing non-thermal health impacts discussed above and the findings that there are exposure windows that produce maximum effects but lower and higher intensity exposures produce much lower effects. The failure of the “safety guidelines” to predict biological effects and therefore safety means that these are not safety guidelines. Consequently, any claims of safety made by the multi-trillion euro telecommunications industry based on these “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent.

These failures of the “safety guidelines” must be considered in terms of the principle that is at the core of the scientific method. That principle is that when we have a scientific theory and we test predictions of that theory and the theory predictions are shown to be false, then we must throw the theory out. It follows that when we have eight highly repeated findings each of which show that the “safety guidelines” do not predict biological effects and do not, therefore, predict safety, it is a scientific requirement that the “safety guidelines” be thrown out. The failure of ICNIRP, the European Commission and various regulatory agencies to throw out the “safety guidelines” clearly shows that their actions are both unscientific and anti-scientific.

Penetration of Millimeter Wave Effects

What can we say, then, about 5G? MM-waves used for 5G also work via VGCC activation. 5G is designed to carry extraordinarily high amounts of information per second and is, therefore, extraordinarily highly pulsed. The electrical parts of these MM-waves do not penetrate well into buildings, such that millions of 5G antennae are planned in close proximity to our home, schools, churches, businesses, etc,
such that it will be nearly impossible to avoid exposures. Given the high pulsation level for 5G radiation, even short exposures may well produce severe biological effects. In addition to this, the finding that 5G systems involve output power sometimes like 30 times higher output than did previous systems, we have an strong argument for disaster (Human exposure to RF fields in 5G downlinkI Nasim, S Kim - arXiv preprintarXiv:1711.03683, 2017 - arxiv.org).

It has been argued by the industry that 5G will only produce effects in the outer millimeter of the body because of the absorption of 5G radiation and other MM-wave frequency EMFs. It is the case that 5G and other millimeter wave frequencies will produce very strong surface effects which are of major concern. But it has also been shown that MM-waves produce highly penetrating effects, impacting human brain function and EEG activity and also impacting many internal organs in animals.
Zalyobokskaya NP, 1977. Biological effect of millimeter radiowaves. Vrachebnoye Delo 3: 116-119. Declassified and Approved for release 2012/05/10: CIA-RDP88B01125R000300120005-6 Levedeva NN, Reactions of the central nervous system to peripheral effects of low-intensity EHF emissions. Approved for release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000100070001-9 Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in
the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41Numerous other citations showing penetrating effects of millimeter waves are cited in: Betskii OY &Lebedeva NN. Low-intensity millimeter waves in biology and medicine. In: Clinical Application of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, Marcel Decker, New York, pp. 30-61. A very recent paper came to the same conclusion that millimeter waves produce highly penetrating effects for the same reason, extensive empirical evidence: Kostoff et al (Toxicol Lett 2020:323;35-40).

So the industry claims are wrong on this as in so many other areas. How can we get such penetrating effects? The magnetic parts of the coherent EMFs are highly penetrating. They place forces on dissolved ions in the aqueous parts of our cells and bodies, moving those ions and regenerating the electrical parts of the EMFs with the same frequency and pulsations, just much lower intensity. Those can then activate theVGCC voltage sensor because of its extraordinary sensitivity to the electrical forces of even very weak EMFs. So the physics again tells us how the system works on the main actual biological target of the VGC voltage sensor.

The impacts of any full-fledged 5G (it always works together with 4G) will be vastly worse than any initial impacts seen following the turning on of 5G, because initially 5G has little to communicate with, so it will initially have much less pulsation. My six worst nightmares is that 5G will produce widespread in most cases universal or near-universal impact of the following types (and each of these needs to be considered in detail, based on the available evidence):

1. A rapid and irreversible crash in human reproduction to close to zero, based mainly but not solely on the impacts on male reproduction.
2. A rapid (albeit somewhat slower than in 1) crash in our collective brain function produced by massive impacts on human brain
structure and function.
3. Very early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia also caused by the human brain impact seen in 2.
4. Autism and ADHD caused primarily by perinatal 4G/5G exposures.
5. Massive deterioration in the human gene pool, caused by the DNA effects in human sperm and possibly also on human eggs.
6. Widespread sudden cardiac death in all age ranges caused by the EMF impacts on the pacemaker cells in the sino-atrial node of the heart.

What are we actually seeing initially from 5G?

The reports of human effects in Switzerland included many reports of neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and also cardiac effects.

https://www.illustre.ch/magazine/5g-sentons-cobayes (https://www.illustre.ch/magazine/5g-sentons-cobayes?utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR1kXKK1yWBDKoaZRVOQB7gRvC8o-1a3GyVbQHJPyPkAzzpl73iKYtaiA6Q)

There are, of course many reviews reporting such effects, as discussed above, following EMF exposures. The physicians in Stuttgart reported these same two types of effects following 5G rollout and in addition, high amounts of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).

https://www.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/inhalt.demo-am-staatsministerium-in-stuttgart-protest-gegen-5-g-in-weissen-arztkitteln.f964401b-85f9-4915-a236-4f3177597300.html

All three of these effects were reported to occur following smart meter exposures in both the Lamech and also the Conrad studies; all three were also reported to occur in the largest EMF occupational exposures studies ever performed as reviewed by Professor Emeritus Karl Hecht. The difference is that the effects appear to be much more severe following 5G exposure as opposed to the occupational exposure studies or even the smart meter studies. I am aware of still more severe apparent 5G neuropsychiatric effects in Southern California, but those have not been published to date. We have every reason to believe that any full fledged 5G system, communicating with the “internet of things” will produce still vastly greater effects than any of these initial findings.

It was proudly announced in England that an ambulance service will be using 5G communication between the ambulances and the hospitals served by them. The first such ambulance, it was proudly announced, was to be put into operation in Coventry in the West Midlands region of the UK:

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/what-is-5g-15108544

So what happened when that 5G ambulance was operational? What happened is that three of the ambulance personnel died within an 11 day period of apparent suicide: Three NHS workers die suddenly while working for same 'toxic' ambulance trust. Could 5G be related? Alan Selby Mirror Sun, 24 Nov 2019 02:23 UTC;

https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2019-11-22/concern-for-welfare-of-east-of-england-ambulance-staff-after-three-deaths-in-11-days/

Shortly before their deaths a whistleblower wrote to the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust's boss complaining about psychological abuse. There are widespread neuropsychiatric effects produced by low-intensity EMF exposures, including depression. Depression can cause suicide and various neuropsychiatric effects may well lead to abusive behavior.
Two large occurrences of panic in cattle in the North Friesland area of the Netherlands correlated with 5G testing exposures:

https://www.melkvee.nl/artikel/191780-koeien-in-paniek-mogelijk-door-testen-5g-netwerk/

This should not be surprising, given that EMF exposures cause neurological/neuropsychiatric effects. Two specific mechanisms are likely to be involved in producing panic in cattle. Excessive VGCC activity produces fear conditioning in animals and in humans (Kabir et al, J Physiol 2016; 20:5823-5837). EMFs also acting via excessive VGCC activity also produce large increases in the release of norepinephrine, the fight or flight hormone. These two are likely to act together to produce panic. The impact of EMFs on milk production in dairy cattle suggests that cattle may be quite sensitive to EMF effects. There are also several incidences of bizarre, aggressive behavior of cattle and sheep from Germany that may also be related to 5G radiation effects:

1.https://www.nordbuzz.de/niedersachsen/niedersachsen-ort29155/papenburg-oldenburg-niedersachsen-schock-schafe-brechen-attackieren-menschen-11833036.html
2.https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/bayern-peiting-kuh-bauernhof-dach-1.4626878
3.https://www.bayerische-staatszeitung.de/staatszeitung/leben-in-bayern/detailansicht-leben-in-bayern/artikel/danger-die-kuh-das-wilde-wesen.html#topPosition
4.https://www.tz.de/bayern/altoetting-bayern-tier-drama-kuh-buext-aus-stall-aus-sie-ueberlebt-ihren-ausflug-nicht-12189661.html
5.https://www.tz.de/bayern/altoetting-bayern-tier-drama-kuh-buext-aus-stall-aus-sie-ueberlebt-ihren-ausflug-nicht-12189661.html
6.https://www.tz.de/welt/ice-strecke-kassel-wuerzburg-kuh-laeuft-in-tunnel-und-legt-bahnverkehr-lahm-zr-11832114.html

Each of these needs to be clearly investigated for possible roles of 5G radiation. The 5th of these is the most clearly linked to 5G because the cow involved is from North Friesland, where cattle were, as noted in the second paragraph above, exposed to 5G radiation. Each of these must be investigated before any final conclusions can be drawn. However given that the “safety guidelines” have been repeatedly shown to fail to predict biological effects and therefore safety and that therefore, all assurances of safety based on those “safety guidelines” are fraudulent, and that there are plausible mechanisms by which EMF exposures can cause these effects, it is essential that the obvious possible cause, electromagnetic field exposures from 5G and/or high antenna density 4G radiation, should be extensively studied.

There have been a series of very unusual human birth defects, in both Germany and France, involving aberrant limb development, such as aberrant hand and finger structure and even missing hands or missing arms.

https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/menschen/gelsenkirchen-drei-saeuglinge-mit-handfehlbildungen-geboren-16382810.html

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/171108105918-baby-feet-stock-large-169.jpg

None of the many articles on these limb birth defects have suggested a link to 5G EMF exposures but such a link should be considered. The reason for that is that Bates et al, Ion Channels in Development and Cancer, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2015; 31: 231-247 showed that elevation of both VGCC activity and also elevation of other voltage-gated ion channels can produce aberrant limb development. While the excessive activities of single channels do not produce aberrations identical to those in these recent human birth defects, a combination of excessive voltage-gated ion channel activities may well do so. Among the genetic studies showing that excessive activity of a particular VGCC produce limb developmental defects are the studies on Timothy syndrome. The Timothy syndrome mutation produces much higher VGCC activity because the closing mechanism of the channel is defective, such that activated channels close extremely slowly such that they produce much higher [Ca2+]i. The Timothy syndrome mutation produces not only limb development aberrations but also severe cases of autism and also cardiac effects. Most Timothy syndrome individuals die of apparent sudden cardiac death at age ranges circa 3 to 7 years old – the oldest known Timothy syndrome individual died at age 13. Here we have two effects produced or apparently produced by 5G exposures, the cardiac effects and the limb birth defects and a third proposed to be caused perinatal by 5G exposures, namely autism, all linked in their causation to VGCC activation.

There were hundreds of birds that died of apparent sudden cardiac death during three days of 5G testing in a park near Rotterdam.

https://www.healthnutnews.com/hundreds-of-birds-dead-during-5g-experiment-in-the-hague-the-netherlands/

There had been earlier stories published on these bird deaths where the industry denied doing 5G testing but in this article, it was shown that workers had been told to lie about those tests. It has been shown in rodents that MM-wave exposure (non-pulsed) can cause sudden cardiac death (Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41 (in Russian)), making it very plausible that these bird deaths were in fact caused by 5G exposures. A second apparent large epidemic of birds falling out the sky of apparent cardiac death occurred last October shortly after the 5G ambulance was turned on in Coventry (see discussion above): , In October, there were already reports that birds fell down from the sky outside the Coventry hospital, after 5G antennas were turned on to enable the Smart Ambulance 5G wireless system in Coventry.

See link:

https://www.facebook.com/Francesalexandrina/posts/2704854299560059

Insect will be massively impacted by 5G EMFs. In 2000 and 2001, two US patents issued for the use of millimeter wave EMFs as insecticides (patent #s 6,073,365 and 6,192,598). These were for using nonpulsed EMFs not the extraordinarily pulsed and therefore dangerous 5G EMFs. 5G will likely cause massive fires because of the impact of 5G EMFs on plants. EMFs impact plants producing large increases in intracellular calcium levels which act in turn to produce large increases in highly volatile and highly flammable terpenes. This, in turn, can make the plants burn as if they were sprayed with a light spray of gasoline. We may have seen the first 5G fires. Five cities along the east coast of South Korea, where some of the earliest 5G rollouts in the world occurred, had their 5G systems turned on – late April 3, 2019. The five unprecedented fires occurred in those same cities 1 ½ days later, April 5, 2019!

https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/s-korea-launches-5g-networks-early-to-secure-world-first/article26730605.ece;
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/05/thousands-flee-homes-wildfires-rip-south-korea/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8799140/south-korea-biggest-wildfire-near-olympic-city/

Other possible 5G fires may have also occurred in 2019 in areas of Southern California where 5G was rolled out, including along I405 freeway.

Role of 5G in the Coronavirus Epidemic in Wuhan China

Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province in China, was chosen to be China’s first 5G “smart city” and the location of China’s first smart 5G highway. Wuhan is also the center of the horrendous coronavirus epidemic. The possible linkage between these two events was first discussed in an Oct. 31, 2019 article entitled: “Wuhan was the province where 5G was rolled out, now the center of deadly virus”

https://5gemf.com/wuhan-was-the-province-where-5g-was-rolled-out-now-the-center-of-deadly-virus/

The question that is being raised here is not whether 5G is responsible for the virus, but rather whether 5G radiation, acting via VGCC activation may be exacerbating the viral replication or the spread or lethality of the disease. Let’s backtrack and look at the recent history of 5G in Wuhan in order to get some perspective on those questions.

An Asia Times article, dated Feb.12,2019

https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/02/article/china-to-launch-first-5g-smart-highway

Stated that there were 31 different 5G base stations (that is antennae) in Wuhan at the end of 2018. There were plans developed later such that approximately 10,000 5G antennae would be in place at the end of 2019, with most of those being on 5G LED smart street lamps. The first such smart street lamp was put in place on May 14, 2019

www.china.org.cn/china/2019-05/14/content_74783676.htm (http://www.china.org.cn/china/2019-05/14/content_74783676.htm)

But large numbers only started being put in place in October, 2019, such that there was a furious pace of such placement in the last 2 ½ months of 2019. These findings show that the rapid pace of the coronavirus epidemic developed at least roughly as the number of 5G antennae became extraordinarily high. So we have this finding that China’s 1st 5G smart city and smart highway is the epicenter of this epidemic and this finding that the epidemic only became rapidly more severe as the numbers of 5G antennae skyrocketed.

Are these findings coincidental or does 5G have some causal role in exacerbating the coronavirus epidemic? In order to answer that question, we need to determine whether the downstream effects of VGCC activation exacerbate the viral replication, the effects of viral infection, especially those that have roles in the spread of the virus and also the mechanism by which this coronavirus causes death. Accordingly, the replication of the viral RNA is stimulated by oxidative stress: J Mol Biol. 2008 Nov 28;383(5):1081-96. Variable oligomerization modes in coronavirus non-structural protein 9. Ponnusamy R, Moll R, Weimar T, Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R.
Other aspects of viral replication including those involved in the spread of the virus are stimulated by increased intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis, each of which are increased following EMF exposure. The first citation below shows an important role of VGCC activation in stimulating coronavirus infection.
Virology. 2020 Jan 2;539:38-48. Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) modulates calcium influx to favor viral replication. Bai D, et al.
J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
Cell Calcium. 2018 Nov;75:30-41. NAADP-dependent Ca2+ signaling regulates Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus pseudovirus translocation through the endolysosomal system. Gunaratne GS, et al.
J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
Proteome Sci. 2011 Mar 8;9:11. Proteomic analysis of chicken embryonic trachea and kidney tissues after infection in ovo by avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus. Cao Z, et al.
Res Vet Sci. 2015 Jun;100:12-7. Serum biomarkers of oxidative stress in cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Tecles F, et al.
J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;197(6):812-6. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency enhances human coronavirus infection. Wu YH et al.
J Virol. 1998 Jun;72(6):4918-24. Transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus induces programmed cell death in infected cells through a caspase-dependent pathway. Eleouet JF, et al.

The predominant cause of death from this coronavirus is pneumonia. Pneumonia is greatly exacerbated by each of those five downstream effects of VGCC activation, excessive intracellular calcium, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis. The first of the citations listed below shows that calcium channel blockers, the same type of drugs that block EMF effects, are useful in the treatment of pneumonia. This predicts that EMFs, acting via VGCC activation, will produce increasingly severe pneumonia and therefore 5G radiation as well as other types of EMFs may well increase pneumonia deaths.

Zheng et al. 2016 Preadmission Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and Outcomes After Hospitalization With Pneumonia: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Ther. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):e30- e38.
Fang et al. 2017 Pneumolysin-Dependent Calpain Activation and Interleukin-1α Secretion in Macrophages Infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2017 Aug 18;85(9). pii: e00201-17.

Fettel et al. 2019 Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) induces potent anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo by S1P receptor 4-mediated suppression of 5-lipoxygenase activity. FASEB J. 2019 Feb;33(2):1711- 1726.
Liu and Shi. 2019 Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 1 (CLCA1): More than a regulator of chloride transport and mucus production. World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Nov 29;12(11):100077.

Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15393. Surfactant protein D attenuates acute lung and kidney injuries in pneumonia-induced sepsis through modulating apoptosis, inflammation and NF-κB signaling. Du J, et al.
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020 Jan 28. MicroRNA (miR)-429 promotes inflammatory injury by targeting kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in neonatal pneumonia. Zhang L, et al.
Life Sci. 2019 Jul 1;228:189-197. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 targets miR-146a-5p/CCL5 to regulate LPS-induced WI-38 cell apoptosis and inflammation in acute pneumonia. Zhou Z, et al.

These all argue that 5G radiation is likely to greatly exacerbate the spread of the coronavirus and to greatly increase the lethality of the infections produced by it. The good news is that it is likely that those of us that live in areas with no 5G radiation and who avoid other EMFs wherever possible will probably escape much of the impacts of this prospective global pandemic. It is highly probable that one of the best things Wuhan can do to control the epidemic in the city is to turn off the 4G/5G system.
In summary, we have a series of 5G linked events that have occurred in more than one situation, where we have plausible mechanisms by which 5G radiation can cause them and where we know that counter arguments are based on “safety guidelines” which fail to predict biological effects and are, therefore, fraudulent.

These include:

1. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects reported both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to but more severe than effects caused by other EMF exposures.

2. Three suicides within 11 days of each other in the first 5G ambulance personnel

3. Cardiac effects also reported in both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to those found in in humans in following other EMF exposures as well as in animal experimental studies.

4. Two cases of massive, almost instantaneous 5G bird sudden cardiac death effects, one in the Netherlands and one in the UK.

5. We have cases of mass panic in cattle, as well as unusual aggressive behavior in cattle and sheep.

6. We have multiple cases of human limb birth defects in France and Germany.

7. We have multiple cases of apparent 5G fires in Korea and in Southern California.

8. We have large apparent increases in EHS in Stuttgart Germany. While this is a single example, to my knowledge, similar although more slowly developing examples of EHS have been shown to occur in occupational EMF exposure studies and in the two smart meter studies. The case may be weaker here, because it is based solely on the Stuttgart example, but is still substantial.

9. Four downstream effects produced by EMFs acting via VGCC activation, oxidative stress, NFkappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis greatly stimulate both coronavirus infectious process, including aspects involved in viral spreading and also pneumonia, the predominant cause of death in the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic. It follows from this that the “coincidence” that Wuhan, China’s first smart 5G city and location of China’s first 5G highway and the other “coincidence” that the epidemic was first discovered when high 5G antenna densification started, with the severity of the epidemic and death rate increasing very rapidly as circe 8,000 5G antennae were built all over the city of Wuhan. It is, therefore, highly probable that these are not coincidences but rather involve causal roles of 5G EMFs.

In each of these cases, as stated above, we have plausible mechanisms by which each of them can be produced by 5G EMF exposure and where all contrary claims based on “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent. In the eight of these of these effects (#8 being an apparent exception), we have a prima facie case for 5G causation. And let me repeat that any effects seen with the initial “rollout” of 5G radiation will be a tiny fraction of those predicted by a mature 5G system interacting with the “internet of things” because any initial 5G system has very little to communicate with on initial rollout and therefore will produce only a tiny fraction of highly pulsed EMF effects of such a mature system. The very high impacts of modulating and nonmodulating pulses mean that the extraordinarily high level of modulating pulses in 5G radiation, with those pulses communicating vast amounts of information per second, means that 5G radiation is vastly more dangerous than the exposures we previously have had and those previous exposures have already having massive impacts on us and on other organisms.

The eight apparent 5G effects listed above do not include other predicted massive effects of 5G radiation where we have no evidence of whether they are occurring or not but where we have evidence of important causal roles of other EMF exposures.

These include:

1. Massive impacts on male reproduction, where 5G radiation may well produce very rapid crashes in male reproduction to close to zero.

2. Universal of near universal very early onset Alzheimer’s dementias (AD). Here we know that all you have to do to produce universal or near universal very early onset AD in a rat model, is to give a series of EMF pulses during one day and even during one second. If you give pulses every day, you get universal or near universal AD in six month old rats (roughly the equivalent age of a 12 year old child).

3. Universal or near universal autism. We know, from genetic studies, that human autism is caused by excessive VGCC activity and because this is the primary mechanism of action of EMFs, including MM-wave EMFs of 5G, it is highly plausible that the very highly pulsed 5G may cause universal or near universal autism. 4. Very high levels of germ line mutations caused by the impact of 5G radiation acting via VGCC activation on the DNA of human sperm and on the DNA of human oocytes. What this argues is that what little human reproduction survives the effects of #1 may well be heavily impacted by very high levels of de novo mutation.

Possible causation of each of these by 5G radiation could have been tested by animal model studies, before any 5G rollout. It is my opinion that it is an atrocity of almost unbelievable proportions that no such tests have been done. All of this argues that 5G presents threats of the sort that we have never seen before – multiple imminent existential threats to our survival.

Source (https://fourfoldhealing.com/blogs/news/massive-predicted-effects-of-5g)

ExomatrixTV

4th September 2020, 11:45

🤔 Did we ever had a real "Balanced" #5G vs #Stop5G report in Mainstream Media? ... Still no real (unedited) MSM debate allowed, why? ... Even if 5G will impact ALL of Humanity and all Biological Life forms forever!

⚠️ ICNIRP and/or W.H.O. and/or FCC discussed in any Pro 5G video or MSM articles? 🌐 Always share these 58 Stop5G links

01. DrMartinPall-vs-ICNIRP (http://whynotnews.eu/pdf/5G-Risks-The-Scientific-Perspective-Science2Stop5G.pdf) (PDF)
02. WHO-5G-EMFs-CoverUp (https://www.emfoff.com/cover-up/)
03. MSM-Bias-Fact-Check-5G (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/why-does-msm-like-bbc-metro-wired-feel-the-need-to-misrepresent-stop5g-activists/)
04. Stop5G-vs-ICNIRP-Corruption (http://tinyurl.com/Stop5G-vs-ICNIRP-Corruption)
05. ICNIRP-Corruption-Dossier-01 (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/icnirpcorruption)
06. MSM-ICNIRP-Deceptive-Content (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/msm-pushes-bogus-radiation-watchdog-icnirp-2020-safety-guidelines-not-safety-standards-backed-by-evidence/)
07. FCC A Captured Agency (https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/harvard-press-book-telecom-industry-influence-us-fcc-captured-agency/)
08. Scientific-American-5G-Warning (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/)
09. 5G-Warning-by-IEEE (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/5g-warning-by-institute-of-electrical-electronics-engineers/)
10. 5G-EU-Science-Appeal (https://www.jrseco.com/european-union-5g-appeal-scientists-warn-of-potential-serious-health-effects-of-5g/)
11. 2020-Science2Stop5G (http://whynotnews.eu/pdf/2020-Academic-Science2Stop5G-Paper-Extreme-Danger-of-5G.pdf) (PDF)
12. Science2Stop5G-2020 (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/902581193510370/)
13. 5GviolatesNurembergCode (https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/62452/LARGEST_UNETHICAL_MEDICAL_EXPERIMENT_FINAL.pdf) (PDF)
14. WHO-and-5G-Corporatism (https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046)
15. Stop5G-Scientists-and-Doctors (https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/05/15/scientists-doctors-make-it-quite-clear-that-5g-could-pose-a-risk-to-human-health/)
16. Gov-Ignore-Own-EMF-Evidence (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/government-ignoring-its-own-wireless-radiation-risks-evidence/)
17. ICNIRP-5G-Safety-Deceptions-II (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/exposing-icnirp-5g-safety-deceptions-part-ii/)
18. Stop5G-CHD-vs-FCC (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/chd-gives-notice-to-fcc-against-5g-cell-towers/)
19. Smartphone-Radiation-Law (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/smartphone-radiation-lawfully-reduced-restricted-in-belgium-march-2020/)
20. Legitimate-5G-Concerns (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/questions-about-negative-5g-effects-are-legitimate-says-minister-rudi-medved/)
21. 5G-Health-Risks-Warning (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/dutch-surgeon-oncologist-warns-of-long-term-5g-radiation-risks/)
22. 5G-Russian-Roulette (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/5g-russian-roulette-with-our-health/)
23. Top100-Science2Stop5G-Videos (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/doctors-scientists/)
24. Stop5G-Disband-ICNIRP (https://microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house)
25. NEPA-vs-FCC-Stop5G (https://mdsafetech.org/2019/12/08/nepa-the-nrdc-and-5g-neighborhood-cell-towers/)
26. 5G-Can-Damage-Eyes-Skin (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/study-commissioned-by-parliament-austria-5g-can-damage-eyes-skin/)
27. Sub-TerraHerz-5G-Dangers (https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/is-5g-safe/)
28. 5G-1st-Safety-2nd-FCC-Policy (https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/putting-the-cart-before-the-horse-the-fccs-5g-first-safety-second-policy/)
29. Green-Party-and-5G (https://www.5gexposed.com/2019/05/28/proposal-for-a-5g-moratorium-motion-green-party/)
30. Non-Ionizing-Radiation-Lie (https://reject5g.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Big-Telecoms-Big-Non-Ionizing-Lie6.pdf) (PDF)
31. EU-Greens-vs-ICNIRP (http://tinyurl.com/EU-Greens-vs-ICNIRP)
32. Devra-Davis-PhD-Science2Stop5G (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-JUNE-2020.pdf) (PDF)
33. ICNIRP-Conflict-of-Interest (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/ICNIRP-Conflict-of-Interest-in-Bioelectromagnetics.pdf) (PDF)
34. ICNIRP-SCAM (https://www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/the-scientists-and-the-organisations#conflict-of-interest)
35. ICNIRP-Serves-5G-Industry (https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/2020/5g-covid-conspiracy/)
36. 5G-Massive-Health-Experiment (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5784487/The-roll-5G-wireless-service-massive-health-experiment-public-health-expert-warns-a.html)
37. FCC-5G-Lawsuit (https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Our-Legal-Actions-Update--My-Cong--Voting-Results--Armenian-USSR-TV-Covers-5G.html)
38. 400-MDs-Against-FCC-5G-Plans (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/400-medical-professionals-against-fcc-plans-for-expanded-wireless-5g-june-2020/)
39. 5G-in-5-minutes (https://www.bitchute.com/video/coy4VhCvjixi/)
40. Stop5G-Victories (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/multiple-cities-successfully-stopping-or-banning-5g-worldwide/)
41. Stop5G-Brainstorm (http://tinyurl.com/Stop5G-Brainstorm)
42. ICNIRP-Needs-Your-Ignorance (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/961926904242465/)
43. FCC-Ignores-SAR-Children (https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/fcc-limit/)
44. EMFs-and-Wildlife-Stop5G (https://www.emfresearch.com/emf-wildlife/)
45. Specs-Beamforming-5G-Towers (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/962454057523083/)
46. Stop5G-MSM-Straw-Man-Fallacy (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/963994264035729/)
47. Quantum-Fractal-Antennas-vs-5G (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111429-Intermediary-effect-and-function-of-Fractal-Antennas-to-Quantum-World)
48. NewNormal-was-all-Planned (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/967208497047639/)
49. Corrupt-Perception-Management (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/963975014037654/)
50. July2020-Science2Stop5G-Papers (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/July-2020-Science2Stop5G-Papers.pdf) (PDF)
51. Non-Ionizing-Lie-Explained (https://reject5g.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Big-Telecoms-Big-Non-Ionizing-Lie-Explained-Rev6.pdf) (PDF)
52. Science2Stop5G-Legal-Action (http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/Science2Stop5G-Danish-Legal-Action-Jensen-2019.pdf) (PDF)
53. 17-Legit-5G-Questions (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/988903244878164/)
54. EU-5G-PDF-File-2020 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf) (PDF)
55. Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-)
56. Bogus-5G-is-Virus-Exposed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/998867930548362/)
57. WhatTheyDoNotWantYouToSee (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/1001874936914328/)
58. Telecoms Are Losing the 5G Battles (https://scientists4wiredtech.com/telecoms-losing-the-densified-4g-5g-battle/)

🤔 99,9% chance they (MSM) can NOT summarize above 58 links ... because their minds are already made up! ... 1000s of mainstream publications are UNBALANCED ... and the moment they decide to make it "balanced" and allow better more "honest" representation of those who are against #5G they are MOST LIKELY able to spin it and to manipulate it in such a way you have the illusion it was "balanced" but we know better as I stated: they can not even make an honest representation / summary of above 58 links! >>> They are corporate pushed Perception Managers!

🌐 If you repeat the corporate pushed narratives over and over and over and over ... that means it takes almost NO EFFORT to explain THEIR views later on ... as most sheeple were already mass conditioned 24/7 why "5G is okay" ... but when you NEVER made an honest summery of above 58 links it is much much harder for the masses to fully comprehend what really is going on ...

🌐 So the moment an alleged (assumed) "balanced" report appears THEY have already had the time to mass brainwash 1000s of times before the "balanced" report even started. That is why I call it the illusion of "free (mainstream) press" or "free (mainstream) media" totally rigged by corporate interests!

🌐 That is why you never find any real (unedited) 5G health risks debate in mainstream media! ... They KNOW they gonna lose face.

ps. Some of the 58 links do not work anymore because Facebook decided to BLOCK all Fb Posts containing Stop5G.net non-commercial site build by me with NO ADDS no sponsors no connections with anyone ... no bullying ... no racism ... no calling for any form of violence ... etc. etc. etc. ... Lucky for me I have a backup for everything I have done on Facebook so I will FIX some broken links very soon and UPDATE the links to work just fine again.

Facebook is KNOWN to be completely wilful slave to W.H.O. (Funded by a.o. Bill Gates & China).

Bogus "5G = virus" narrative & Dis-info memes exposed!

⚠️ In 2017 & 2018 before the mass C0VlD HYSTERIA ... I stated multiple times ON RECORD: That millions of new #5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/5g?__eep__=6) Cell Towers & Smartphones could/can have an impact when we have a "common cold" or "common flu" ... I NEVER said nor claimed "5G = virus" ... Vast majority of our Stop5G Fb Group members neither!

🌐 I also stated that the increase of more and more Erratic Pulsed Microwaves (Non-Native EMFs) Cumulative Radiation everywhere like: 4G WiFi & 5G AFFECTS our >> immune system << as it is shown in Declassified Navy Documents calling it "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" + 1000s other PubMed Peer Reviewed #Science2Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/science2stop5g?__eep__=6) Scientific publications like Dr. Martin Pall ... This evidence is NEVER allowed to be discussed in ANY mainstream media!

⚠️ This very important symptoms list has similarities with "flu-like symptoms" so WHY does the Mass Mainstream Media ONLY focus on the BOGUS "5G = virus narrative" false assumption we suppose to "agree" with? ... Which is an obvious LIE & Straw-man Argument Fallacy Tactic!

🤔 How many "5G = Virus Memes" are NOT made by real #Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/stop5g?__eep__=6) Activists but by those who GAIN to flood social media with DIS-INFO? Then use it to demonize ANYONE discussing 5G + Flu connection we already discussed in 2017 & 2018 ... What if they knew in advance 5G will make ALL common flu & common cold more dangerous for the weak, the elderly and those having multiple other conditions? ... If so, THAT explains the FRAMING of Stop5G Activists to make us go silent (mass censorship).

🦋 Now you know WHY Mainstream Media never allowed a real uncensored (live) debate between Pro 5G vs Stop5G Activists ever last 4 years! ... They FEAR US being treated fair & with 100% transparency for all to see.

If you have ANY EVIDENCE that last 4 years Mainstream Media allowed an honest real open debate where a summary does 100% justice what we stand for ... Feel free to share that evidence here in comments. If you are NOT able to do that ... does that, at least, make you think & question how the masses are conditioned in a very narrow (corporate approved) narrative?

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (http://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G)
Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & Twitter.com/Stop5G (http://Twitter.com/Stop5G)

Luke Holiday

4th September 2020, 14:58

Can 5 G produce a Bradykinin storm?

1. Exomatrix article post:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1375925

2. https://electricalvitality.com/vgcc/

3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657726/
Kinins— The Kallikrein-Kinin System and Oxidative Stress

4. Bradykinin Protects Against Oxidative Stress–Induced Endothelial Cell Senescence
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.123729

The Supercomputer article outlined a CV 19/Bradykinin storm hypothesis. Can 5 G produce the same sx's? The answer is yes - based on connecting the dots of the scientific research below:

A. Reference 1: John's article reveals 5 G's primary negative affect on human health is the disruption of Voltage-Gated Calcium channels (VGCC).

B. Reference 2: Reveals disruption of VGCC causes an increase in oxidative stress.

C. Reference 3/4: Pub med journal articles revealing oxidative stress causes an increase in Bradykinin/Kinin (BK) release. The more oxidative stress the greater the BK release.

In Summary: 5G EMF exposure = Disruption of VGCC's = Increased Oxidative stress in the body = Increased Bradykinin release

Blessings Luke

ExomatrixTV

4th September 2020, 15:10

Luke Holiday

4th September 2020, 15:31

4. Bradykinin Protects Against Oxidative Stress–Induced Endothelial Cell Senescence
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1...AHA.108.123729

Link 4 gives "404 Page not found"

Mod note from Bill: it's an incomplete link, which he copied directly as text after it'd been already shortened on the original page. (Luke often doesn't format his posts correctly. I gave up fixing them on his behalf quite a long time ago.)

... That should do it...link corrected..

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.123729

Thanks Bill ... I had to rewrite it because you deleted the original...

Blessings Luke

onawah

4th September 2020, 23:45

Jordan Maxwell, Edward Riordan... and 5G?
April 24th 2020
Illuminutty Farms
The Big Bad Wolf
69 subscribers

"The conversation took place on Friday evening, April 24th, 2020 around midnight. We discussed Coronavirus, Civil Disobedience, and the "Above The Courts" Digital Banking System that will likely be implemented around October of 2020, whether Trump was selected or elected, "Zionism vs Jesuits" dividing the Truth Community, The Grey Pope, Papal Bloodlines, Two Popes Being Against Canon Law, Something Diabolical, Communism (Democracy), the end of the bull**** Court System in America by design, and the Institution of Tyranny, the beginning of a fascist digital Judge Dredd scenario, Jesus was spit on for trying to guide us. Do we deserve what's happening? Do we prop up the system? Do we need to look in the mirror? Is our apathy and rejection of Truth our undoing?And some other things. So... take from it what you will."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Eg730ytYyHe7 (https://www.bitchute.com/video/Eg730ytYyHe7/)

Eg730ytYyHe7

(He says at the end of September 2020 civilization as we know it will come to a stop.
He's apparently not talking about Covid or the lockdown, because he says that one year and 4 months later, a new system will replace the old one that was destroyed, and it will all be digitalized. In other words, TPTB will have realized their dream of total control over everyone.

It sounds a lot like what Edward Riordan was describing in his remote viewing of the "event horizon", where people would just be "disappeared".
See: CxIutZCmFkw
Riordan says in the 2020s it will all be a "new phase of control over human emotions via the new technology, like a massive podcast, which goes over the earth like a wave".
Sure sounds like 5G to me.
No mention of how all the sudden change would doubtless create a lot chaos and a big, long, painful mopup process afterwards.
He uses the words "new dawn, new day" and describes it as beautiful, but I can't see how this could be positive, unless you suddenly switch to seeing it from the TPTB's perspective when their dream of total control comes true.
Kind of like the Annunaki who decided a huge flood that would get rid of the human race would make the world a better place.
And after all the chaos, there would have to be a long mopup process, which sure wouldn't be "beautiful".

Maxwell warns to beware of things described as "a new day or a new dawn", by the way.
He also says it's ludicrous to think that Covid can be transmitted airborne.
He describes the "great unwashed" masses as only wanting handouts, and says that democracy is just rule by the mob, and that the Democrats are actually Communists.
Most of the rest is about words and their origins.

I was trying to find what Maxwell might have said about 5G and found this interview from his channel, which was not conducted by him, but which presumably he must have been in favor of having on his channel:
5G -THE INTERVIEW OF THE CENTURY ON WIRELESS -ARTEMIS AND APPLE 666-- URGENT FORBIDDEN INFORMATION-
52,087 views•Apr 16, 2018
The Fullerton Informer
120K subscribers
"THE INTERVIEW OF THE CENTURY ON 5G AND THE ENTIRE WIRELESS AGENDA EXPOSED. THE JOE IMBRIANO AKA THE FULLERTON INFORMER INTERRVIEW ON THE JORDAN MAXWELL SHOW. YOU WILL NOT HEAR OR SEE THIS INFORMATION ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD. THIS IS THE MOST FACTUAL, COMPREHENSIVE EXPOSE ON THE 5G WIRELESS ANYWHERE PERIOD. YOUR LINEAGE DEPENDS ON THIS INFORMATION GETTING OUT TO THE MASSES."
tMxLaItznu0Also posted here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111920-Jordan-Maxwell-s-prediction-for-the-world-in-October-2020&p=1376065&viewfull=1#post1376065

( I wanted to see what I could find about what Maxwell says about 5G because of some disagreements on this thread: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111942-A-Supercomputer-Analyzed-Covid-19-and-an-Interesting-New-Theory-Has-Emerged&p=1375729&viewfull=1#post1375729
And recent discussion on the October Surprise thread at: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111797-What-s-the-2020-October-Surprise&p=1372418&viewfull=1#post1372418
Still looking, but I'm assuming Maxwell thinks 5G is dangerous, or he probably wouldn't have had this on his channel.
Jordan Maxwell Show with Guest Host Jeffrey Matte and Special Guest Max Igan 1/26/18
4,652 views•Jan 29, 2018

American Freedom Radio
15.7K subscribers
Tonight's special guest Max Igan, shares his research on what’s really going on and how the system actually works today. He also talks about how some groups are using affidavits to slow or stop the corporate creep of dangerous technologies like smart meters in Hawaii and other unfair changes in our society. The FULL CIRCLE PROJECT. https://www.fullcircleproject.net/ is also a tool which can bring like-minded men and women together in your community to learn more from each other, make friends and take action on key local issues! Max also spends time on what’s really going on with the 5G networks, the smart grid and the Chinese Social Credit system which is transforming and limiting the choices of the citizenry based on desired and undesirable behaviors" )
QruKWuSj20o

greybeard

5th September 2020, 21:21

The 5G Dragnet
The Corbett report

Telecom companies are currently scrambling to implement fifth-generation cellular network technology. But the world of 5G is a world where all objects are wired and constantly communicating data to one another. The dark truth is that the development of 5G networks and the various networked products that they will give rise to in the global smart city infrastructure, represent the greatest threat to freedom in the history of humanity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXbvL0uZkrY

greybeard

5th September 2020, 22:04

Is 5G Safe?

You are being exposed to radiation right now. It’s coming at you from both space and the soil. From water and food. Your body itself is radioactive. And you’re being exposed to microwaves and radio waves, both natural and human-made. WiFi. TV. Radio stations. Cellphones. 3G, 4G and now, 5G.

5G is just getting started. Qualcomm, Samsung, Verizon, LG, Sprint — all these companies and more are right now working to build out the 5G ecosystem. But there is a spreading fear that 5G will cause cancer. Here's why scientific consensus says 5G is safe and will not harm humans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag1hkv2Upww

ExomatrixTV

7th September 2020, 13:47

Main (often ignored or overlooked) insight between 3G, 4G & 5G = with 3G & 4G Cell Towers you have a choice to move/live elsewhere AWAY form the Cancer Cluster Zones... With 5G (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-) (y)our children and their children will be FORCED to be in it 24/7 (much closer proximity) so do your pets, birds, bees, plants, trees and last but not least: yourself.

onawah

9th September 2020, 03:06

MSOM SPECIAL REPORT SR5: Exposure - The Electromagnetic Human Test - James Grundvig
1,940 views•Sep 7, 2020
Making Sense Of The Madness
5.51K subscribers
TRANSCRIPT
https://johnmichaelchambers.com/5g-exposure-the-electromagnetic-human-test/

"The following is an exclusive special report titled, “Exposure – The Electromagnetic Human Test, which will premiere on “Making Sense of the Madness” daily broadcast on Monday September 7, 2020. The eye opening article was written by investigative journalist, James Grundvig. There is far more to the global shutdown, enacted by the Architects of the Plandemic than meets the eye. Much of this is now being revealed if you look in the right places. Exposure – The Electromagnetic Human Test? Just what does this mean? Put on your seatbelts. You are about to find out.

5G Exposure – The Electromagnetic Human Test
The global shutdown, enacted by the Architects of the Plandemic, required misdirection carried out with the skill of a magician: Lure the audience into hypnotic focus on a single object as they rolled out their agenda in veils of concealment. Like the lead up to a grand finale, the Masters of Illusion hooked the audience’s attention with one dazzling move after another. First, with the virus breaking out of China showing people falling dead in the streets and hospitals overrun with bodies. Then, with the worldwide epidemic infecting cruise ships and decimating industries. Next, they imposed fear of the unknown with “asymptomatic” carriers. At each turn there was a new trick. They sold Vaccines made at “Warp Speed” as the only solution; the only way to “return to normal.” They planted more seeds of doubt to keep eyeballs glued on COVID-19 with an endless stream of news bytes on wearing masks, social distancing, and the CDC’s new “Twindemic” coming this flu season.

They weaponized Big Media, while directing the Tech Giants to ban, censor, and erase opposing narratives. They controlled the news. They controlled the information. They controlled the people. Take your eye off the magic wand and one can see the coronavirus serving two purposes.

First, the Architects used it to distract people from discovering the underlying cause of the virus-blamed illnesses. Second, it allowed the rollout of 5G infrastructure on earth and in the sky.The world had been hoodwinked. Using the shelter-in-place orders as cover, telecom contractors installed 5G equipment and networks in empty schools and offices, while many businesses switched on surveillance spacing and tracking apps, electrifying the environment with non-ionizing radiation. With few eyes on the stealth rollout of 5G in 2020, they erected cell towers camouflaged as trees and cacti, and hidden on lamp-posts in the suburbs. The Architects did all of this and more, neither informing the public about the true nature of their plan nor seeking their consent to being exposed in the greatest biological experiment in human history.

The majority of people around the world have little idea they are being doused daily with non-ionizing radiation from space, where they live, and where they travel. Add WiFi, laptops, smartphones and new tracing and spacing apps, and the exposure to millimeter waves have grown exponentially. Soon 5G wireless technology will be everywhere. An omnipresent eye.

The end goal of what the World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab wrote in the Fourth Industrial Revolution report in 2016, aims to transition societies to run on data while be controlled by AI and automation. The onramp of smart vehicles, smart homes, smart buildings, smart factories, and smart cities will one day connect consumers, businesses, and industries in the 6G web of Nikola Tesla’s digital “ether.” Selling the promise of magnitudes of efficiency gains and super-fast download speeds, what’s rarely discussed are the darker elements of the cashless society or the 24/7 surveillance state. Convenience traded in for absolute control. But what is not talked about are the health impacts of living and working in the “hot” environment.

Test Case: Wuhan, China. The industrial hub of 11 million people became the first 5G city in Asia.
On the same October 18, 2019, day as the Gates Foundation-sponsored Event 201 simulated a coronavirus pandemic killing 65 million people, Wuhan hosted the World Military Games. During the two week expo, Wuhan turned on 20 percent of its 10,000 base stations that all went live by year end. Was it a coincidence that the COVID-19 outbreak occurred in the world’s first 5G hot spot city? Or that many of its citizens dropped dead in the street, their brains starved of oxygen, an ailment known as hypoxia or acute mountain sickness?

The next outbreak occurred on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship in February. With one person out of 3,700 people on the ship infected with coronavirus when it docked in Japan for quarantine, the shelter-in-cabin order backfired. In two weeks, COVID-19 spread like wildfire infecting 712 people on board, almost one fifth the total head count.

How did that happen? The world health experts could only venture a guess. Food? HVAC duct systems? What was left out of the probe of the Diamond Princess, however, and three of its sister ships: Princesses Cruises was the first cruise line to become a wireless hot spot. Late last year, the four ships installed Medallion Net, a dual-satellite system using near-earth orbit and geosynchronous satellites to beam WiFi down to the vessels crossing the vast open space of oceans.

The Grand Princess, which docked in Oakland, California, avoided a similar fate. In that case, authorities disembarked the passengers and sent them to quarantine at a nearby military base. The Ruby Princess, which quarantined in Australia, triggered a homicide investigation when eleven of its 250 “unwell” passengers died in less than a week. The next epicenter in the global pandemic shifted to Northern Italy. It, too, like Wuhan, became Europe’s first 5G hot zone. Soon, the Corona-Plague killed off the elderly and the weak, with stay-at-home orders and shutting down businesses doing more harm than having any measurable effect of containing the epidemic. In each instance, like New York and Seattle that followed, COVID-19 spread unevenly flaring up in nursing homes that likely deployed 5G wireless systems for patient monitoring and telehealth.

The question becomes: Why has the world been dealing with a coronavirus outbreak that never behaved like its predecessors before, dating back to the 1960s? And are the long list of unusual ailments, many related to oxygen deprivation, the result of the “common cold” virus? Or is it something else, something less quantifiable such as the next permutation of blanketing the world with Space-X’s new 5G StarLink system?

Under new scrutiny, the coronavirus cover story begins to break apart like the RNA fragments the PCR tests identify as “positive” cases. Could the faulty tests be a tool of deception? Do they also pick up the breakages in human cells, known as exosomes, due to amplification of the new wireless systems, as well as the coronavirus? It would explain why predominantly the elderly and people with comorbidities didn’t survive the onslaught of the next plateau of irradiating the planet.

One last anomaly sticks out of the magician’s act. Scientists found coronavirus strains in the sewer systems of Seattle and Northern Italy… last December. That’s months before the outbreaks started in either region. Did the Architects of the Plandemic preload coronavirus into last season’s flu vaccines in China, Europe, and the United States, as some medical doctors suspect? If so, the Corona-cover story, being natural in origin, takes on a lot of water. What people need to do is watch the schools in the West that reopen this fall to see if new COVID-19 clusters emerge with the children, teens, and staff. New wireless systems installed in those facilities would be another piece of circumstantial evidence that the coronavirus pandemic is in fact a cover story for the deleterious harm caused by switching on 5G satellites and hot spots around the world.

Summary
The Deep State and Shadow Government will stop at nothing. We are at a crossroads for humanity. It’s either us-or them. This one is for all the marbles and this story is not yet over. We have an awesome responsibility to expose the lies and crimes and to reveal the truth. Freedom? It’s up to us. Be sure to share this article far and wide. And remember, stay the course, trust the plan and heed the call for WWG1WGA. God Bless."
QPzGKClDvtQ

onawah

14th September 2020, 20:18

This short video (which also belongs here) of Dr. Rashid Buttar (who usually talks about vaccines, but is obviously very clued in on many subjects) is about how technologies like 5G, which broadcast electromagnetic frequencies and microwaves all over the planet, may not just be affecting lifeforms on planet Earth, but also the planet itself, manifesting in disruptions to the weather, the natural magnetic grid--the very natural pulse of the Earth.
Although 5G has not yet gone planetwide to the extent to which the planners intend, that is in the process, and thousands of 5G broadcasting satellites are already encircling the globe.
( Not sure how this relates to Trump or vaccines, which he also mentions, but hopefully that has been explained elsewhere. However, that video is from 3 months ago, and might as well have been 3 years ago, the way events are amping up. I wish I could understand what Trump is doing re the vaccine--trying to rush it through, with the military involved. etc. Input on that would be most welcome!)

It Will Happen By DECEMBER!! Dr Rashid Buttar
1,679,368 views•Premiered Jun 28, 2020
rv5f6ebjQCc

ExomatrixTV

17th September 2020, 11:51

1306566262663901185

ExomatrixTV

21st September 2020, 14:48

The Secret inside your Cellphone CBC Marketplace
Wm69ik_Qdb8

ExomatrixTV

25th September 2020, 10:15

1309410039862562816
1309243869742202881
1309237419875721217

ExomatrixTV

29th September 2020, 13:46

1310948125713076225
1310912430009090048
1310908585472413698

ExomatrixTV

14th October 2020, 03:14

WTF?! "To Aid LETHALITY???" So They're NOT Just "Phone Towers"
ZOGHLeTvWWM
backup video:

https://archive.org/download/youtube-ZOGHLeTvWWM/WTF_To_Aid_LETHALITY_So_They_re_NOT_Just_Phone_Towers-ZOGHLeTvWWM.mp4

source (https://altcensored.com/watch?v=ZOGHLeTvWWM)

Philippe

14th October 2020, 17:53

Are we already sitting ducks in kill-zones for a vast electromagnetic pulse attack or accident ?
If this very detailed and disturbing report is a hoax, it is very elaborated one. I realize it comes via Benjamin Fulford whom I do not follow ( I have always considered his reports as fiction but useful meaning that they put out creative thoughts of what should be happening)

https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2...-MX2VqMDl9UTuw

GET OVER YOUR BENJAMIN FULFORD AVERSION AND SCROLL DOWN IN THE REPORT OF A WHISTLEBLOWER TO THE 5G COMMENTS

Protesting against 5G is one thing but it is necessary to look at the different dangerous intensities of GHz. And to make the scare complete the possibility to make 5G work through the electricity distribution network. To avoid the wifi to receive TV (which I do not use ) one can let the distribution flow through the electric wiring of the house.

This report explains also the practice of "flogging" with nano particles to sanitize a plane. Important to know for anyone who still hopes to air-travel again

If true that 5G is already implemented using the electricity grid that would explain outbreaks of covid19 in all kind of remote places or third world countries.

ExomatrixTV

14th October 2020, 19:32

⚠️ When I started this Stop 5G before it's irreversible! (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-) Project Avalon Forum Thread 11-11-2017 which has 128,427+ views & 795+ replies!

Back then, the vast majority had no clue how severe 5G (http://Stop5G.net) will be or become (especially when 1000s of new 5G Satellites from space (https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal) spewing Erratic PULSED (Beam Forming) MICROWAVES & mmWaves Radiation 24/7)

... and still there are people who FALSELY assume "it is just all fear porn" some of the moderators/admins even added a tag to this Forum thread "fear-porn" am still waiting if that person changed his or her mind and maybe even apologize ... if not ... all is good as it is not an easy topic and most do not want to go that deep as I did and still do (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g).

I was (on record) warning about (Beam Forming) 4G LTE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_(telecommunication)) & warning about living too close to 3G & 4G Cell Towers for a much longer time on record in (early 2000s up to 2009) and now with millions (or even billions) of people are forced to live near those new toxic 5G cell towers at close proximity 24/7 where most have no choice anymore including your children ... With 4G Cell Towers you always could chose to move (live) to a different location! ... With 5G coming 10 years we will not anymore ... especially when they beam at us from space 24/7 ... Everytime lot of people "forget" this OBVIOUS issue of proximity + time (24/7) of exposure and focus only on corporate pushed propaganda talking points.

cheers,
John Kuhles - October 14, 2020

Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (http://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G) (35,750+ members)

Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) - Twitter.com/Stop5G (http://Twitter.com/Stop5G)
Bitchute.com/channel/Stop5Gdotnet (http://Bitchute.com/channel/Stop5Gdotnet)

onawah

15th October 2020, 00:25

EMERGENCY IN THE HEAVENS
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Emergency-in-the-Heavens.pdf
10/14/20
by Arthur Firstenberg
https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/wpmD5k_LsSBMAo9qLFA5YewJxU87203KQn70m-WS9_tWTB2s_TaJgJOatHZE926hsfM8UE5Y8-0JtKjO_wSc67y3O_Qw3VJKfLsOqnTNFZrie1v4rUD9O2d7L5Kf5dmuM7auWJ4vgWHfpL5-nz38AfoTfdX5Y-ZYH8l1X3idBZBEmV0vRaKPnGgY9XQLfqb1g-FDD-oVQla_TArGdgWDpYQMvmYDpBmPsCO5feuFGDA6r35JEgDof7u-jVEXFPt__bYqw3Kn0veBItPqjWGAVtVyF-KY-zWsHJL6x0J3o4gtUTR6esIiYrXd5-kufzH_DwhaubhMOiH_Sv4icmZtDbgiB9jDjusgixKB3GnouOHL9rcaBNufTZYlr5LcLR5xCWcvHTyoBTpzQnF78vs1KSaAxOhOtA cCjr8hknXIcGE3dOZeaJJEMqB2WKyVFyF4Km2XmdXqk1NudxqGIZkdqorDF1uIpXZk4hIIkXqUz5GHem1CgrG4Mwk=s0-d-e1-ft#http://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=BLZaFN4jRjxI1Bsv6do0JaWJ6jEB4 Sl0v0ugBHisKoOLm7FGxxEVCX0RwU_QfXoa1uEPH6xHQEGdWPjLoc4YGRanUHcPSHxQBxaAprOXg9alJlb4SfxnPQQ2FHxi21wJn weP92cbwRTkOoP3RCGEW-ggI13KVNa_yYHTC6LMZiYoah53bev56fWYsN4-hoJdD1nLnk4mRD0Yz9EBYeblbUPiTUeTevglLu__CH0ZJ9rS

"Early on October 6, 2020 at 5:29 a.m. Mountain Time, SpaceX launched another 60 satellites, to join their fellows racing through the ionized layer of air that protects us and gives us life. At about that time, a good friend of mine here in Santa Fe was awakened by a severe nosebleed. That evening, I told the grocery clerk at the checkout counter that I was feeling unusually tired. “So am I,” he said.

There are now 738 satellites operating in the Starlink constellation. Except for what they can do for us -- connect us faster and faster with billions of people and machines -- everyone pretends that they are not there, that we can continue to punch holes in the air with impunity, burn prodigious amounts of fossil fuels, fill up the stratosphere with black soot, litter the night sky with moving lights, and alter the invisible electric field that connects us with the sun and stars and circulates through our bodies from birth until death.

In recent weeks, on the coast of Australia, record numbers of whales committed suicide by beaching themselves. In Botswana, hundreds of elephants suddenly collapsed and died. Here in the southwest, from Nebraska, to Colorado, to Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, to northern Mexico, millions of migrating birds have fallen dead out of the sky, emaciated, starved to death because there are no insects to eat.

Our house is burning down and no firefighters come. The source of the flames is unacknowledged, unseen. It is there, in the air, speeding from phone to phone, antenna to antenna, satellite to satellite, filling atmosphere, earth, and seas, penetrating bones and disrupting nerves of every animal, bird, insect, and tree.

And it is not because we are horrible people. It is not because of a conspiracy to destroy the world. It is because the phones in our hands demand it. On April 11, 1862, Henry Brooks Adams, grandson of the sixth American president, wrote, “I firmly believe that before many centuries more, science will be the master of man. The engines he will have invented will be beyond his strength to control. Someday science may have the existence of mankind in its power, and the human race commit suicide by blowing up the world.”

That day is here. It is up to us to put out the fire, not just to protest and march and blame other people. We cannot stop the earth from burning down until we stop shooting flames from our fingers wherever we go. It is the people without cell phones who are going to lead the new environmental movement, to lead the way to a sustainable future.

Other technologies pollute inadvertently. Pesticides are intended to kill pests; the fact that they escape into the general environment is unintentional. Nuclear waste is not intended to go everywhere. Plastics are not intended to end up in the ocean. But with cell phones, the pollutant -- radiation -- is the product. Cell phones cannot work unless every square inch of the environment is irradiated. Once this becomes acceptable, nature is no longer of value.

This newsletter will be devoted to two of the engines of science that are beyond our strength to control, that have the existence of the world in their power: cell phones and plastics -- unless we wake up and stop using them.

IT’S NOT LIKE WE DIDN’T KNOW

If Neil Armstrong had brought a cell phone to the moon in 1969, it would have appeared from earth, at night, to be the brightest object in the universe in the microwave spectrum. In the daytime, the sun would have been brighter, but at night, the cell phone would have outshone every star.

There is a reason cell phones are outlawed in Green Bank, West Virginia, home of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory: even a single cell phone, even from miles away, would blind the radio astronomers there and make it impossible for them to see the stars. Astronomers measure radio waves in units called janskys. A typical star shines at 10 to 100 janskys. The Sun shines at about 500,000 janskys. When you hold a cell phone against your head, you are pumping energy at the rate of about 100,000,000,000,000,000 janskys into your brain.[1]

If we are going to save this planet, we have to be able to think and reason. And we have known since 1975 that microwave radiation damages the brain. In that year, Allan Frey published his ground-breaking article, “Neural function and behavior: defining the relationship.”[2] In a study on rats, he found that low-level microwaves -- one hundred times lower than what people’s brains are exposed to from their cell phones today -- damage the blood-brain barrier. This is the anatomical barrier that keeps toxic chemicals, bacteria and viruses in your blood from entering your brain. It is also the barrier that maintains the inside of your head at a constant pressure and prevents you from having a stroke.

At least twenty laboratories in many countries confirmed Frey’s work over the years. Finally, in 2003, neurosurgeon Leif Salford, at Lund University in Sweden, proved the obvious: that disrupting the blood-brain barrier causes brain damage. He exposed rats to a cell phone, once for two hours, at very low power, and sacrificed them fifty days later. Two percent of the exposed rats’ brain cells were damaged or destroyed.[3] He later exposed rats to a cell phone, again at very low power, for two hours once a week for a year, and found that they were cognitively impaired.[4]

And in 2020, a study has been published showing that the same thing happens in humans. A team of scientists at Heidelberg University in Germany used MRIs to examine the brains of 48 young adults between the ages of 18 and 30. They found that the more hours per day their subjects habitually spent on their smartphones, the less gray matter they had in their brains and the less brain activity was detected.[5]

DITCH YOUR PHONE AND JOIN ECHOEarth

My newsletter of May 20, 2020 reported on the formation of an organization for people who do not own cell phones. It is called ECHOEarth and it stands for End Cellphones Here On Earth. My newsletter of June 18, 2020 reported that Collectif Dring Dring in France had joined forces with ECHOEarth. Our joint mission is “to liberate humankind from the mobile phone. Physical and mental health, freedom, privacy, ecology, relationships... The mobile phone is a poison for each of these elements.” Anyone who does not own a mobile phone can join ECHOEarth here: https://www.echoearth.org/sign-here (in English) or here: https://www.echoearth.org/signez-ici (in French).

So far 1,250 people from 67 countries have joined ECHOEarth. We have only just begun. Please join us to save this planet.

PLASTIC, PLASTIC EVERYWHERE, NOR ANY DROP TO DRINK

“Plastic is choking our oceans and destroying our planet,” said an article in the June 2019 issue of Adidas magazine. It went on: “Plastic is everywhere you look. It’s in food packaging, electronics, cars, toys, credit cards and clothes. Plastic is also everywhere you can’t look. It’s littering uninhabited beaches 3,000 miles from the nearest human being, killing off the plankton that produce our oxygen kilometers beneath the surface of the ocean, and clogging the gullets of albatross chicks in the Pacific. Plastic is also moving through your body, your bloodstream, your organs and those of the people you love.”

There is now more than a ton of plastic littering our planet for every person on Earth, says that article.

And when plastic bottles and bags break down, they don’t disappear: they turn into what is being called “microplastics,” which can persist for hundreds of years and are filling up our air, water, and soil. According to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature,[6] a large portion of the microplastics in our environment come not from what we ordinarily think of as “plastic,” but are fibers from synthetic clothing that wear away in our washing machines and end up in our rivers and oceans, and particles from automobile tires that wear away on our roads, wash away in the rain, and also end up in our rivers and oceans.

According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, at the present rate of accumulation, there will be more plastics by weight than fish in our oceans by the year 2048.[7]

It was estimated that between 5 and 13 million metric tons of plastic entered the oceans in 2010, and it was projected that this would increase to between 100 and 250 metric tons per year by 2025.[8] All that plastic does not just float on top of the water, it is mixed throughout the ocean and even has been getting deposited in sediments on the ocean floor. A study from Australia that was just published on October 5, 2020 analyzed deep-sea sediments hundreds of kilometers from the Australian shore and found up to 13 fragments of plastic in every gram of sediment they analyzed.[9]

And the world’s plastics are not just ending up in the oceans. We are also breathing them. Scientists at King’s College sampled the air on a nine-story-high riverside rooftop and estimated that an average of 771 particles of plastic were falling from the air everyday onto every square meter of London.[10] Janice Brahney, from Utah State University, collected both air and rain samples in national parks and wilderness areas of the United States, and found that an average of 132 particles of plastic were being deposited out of the atmosphere everyday on every square meter of protected U.S. western lands. Many of the particles were small enough to have been transported hundreds or thousands of miles from their place of origin.[11]

A team of German scientists found incredible amounts of plastic even in snow in the Swiss and Bavarian Alps, and in the Arctic. Arctic snow contained an average of 1,760 particles of plastic per liter of snow, with one site containing over 14,000 plastic particles per liter. At one site in the Bavarian Alps there were 154,000 particles of plastic in a liter of snow.[12]

Cell phones are made of plastic. We throw them away by the billions.

UPDATE ON OUR FEDERAL LAWSUIT

On December 21, 2018, I organized and funded a lawsuit against the City of Santa Fe, New Mexico; the State of New Mexico; and the United States of America, to restore the constitutional rights of the people of the United States. We are challenging the constitutionality of a City ordinance, a State law, and Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

These laws, and laws like them all over the world, effectively mandate the placement of antennas on the streets and sidewalks in front of homes and businesses, while depriving injured people of any means of protest, or any remedy for their injuries.

These laws violate:

the First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech;
the First Amendment Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances;
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Right not to be deprived of Life, Liberty or Property without Due Process of Law;
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Right not to have property taken without Just Compensation.

On May 6, 2020, the District Court dismissed our complaint, and we immediately filed an appeal in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver. The case is Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety v. City of Santa Fe, Case No. 20-2066. Oral argument has not yet been scheduled.

You can read our briefs here: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/5g-litigation

This is the only case of its kind in the United States. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act prohibits States and local governments from regulating cell towers on the basis of their health or environmental effects. This is a vitally important lawsuit. Donations are always welcome.

Arthur Firstenberg
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org
https://www.5gSpaceAppeal.org "

Hughe

22nd October 2020, 03:13

FRANCE: Lille City Council adopts a moratorium on 5G deployment

Mayor Martine Aubry has "doubts" about the health and environmental impacts of 5G.

By Le Figaro with AFP https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-eco/5g-le-conseil-municipal-de-lille-vote-un-moratoire-sur-le-deploiement-20201010

Published on 10 October 2020 at 11: 14, updated on 11 October 2020 at 10:30

Martine Aubry, socialist Mayor of Lille, prefers to wait for the publication of the report of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), in 2021

The City Council of Lille adopted a moratorium on the deployment of 5G on the night of Friday to Saturday, the city announced. "Because we have doubts about the deployment of 5G both from the point of view of health and environmental impact, we adopted a (...) moratorium. It is vital to wait!", tweeted Lille Mayor Martine Aubry.

"Before we can say that 5G definitely represents a step forward for our cities and their inhabitants, it seems to us that several grey areas (...) remain to be clarified", the elected officials explain in the text of the motion, presented by the municipal majority, the group Lille in Common. "Official reports published in recent months (...) still do not enable the most appropriate authorities to exclude any real risk to populations in connection with exposure to this new technology, " they argue.

The elected officials also question the "high level of investments required", in the "difficult financial context" of the Covid-19 epidemic, or the "real utility" of this technology, which will force individuals and professionals "to renew their electronic products despite any consideration related to their sustainability".

The motion adopted provides for the suspension within the municipality "of any authorization of installation or activation of antennas + test + related to 5G technology (...) at least until the publication of the ANSES report expected in 2021" [French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety]. The Lille in Common group is asking the European Metropolis of Lille (MEL) [an intercommunal structure, composed by a network of big cities (Lille, Roubaix, Tourcoing, Villeneuve d'Ascq, Armentières, etc.] to take "a similar position".

The metropolis of Bordeaux adopted a motion at the end of September asking the government to place a moratorium on this technology and to delay the process of frequency allocation. The executive rejected the idea of a moratorium on the 5G spectrum auction, also put forward by 70 representatives from left and ecological parties in mid-September, citing the absence of any health risk.

onawah

22nd October 2020, 20:09

Response Brief Filed in Landmark Case Against FCC on 5G and Wireless Health Impacts
OCTOBER 20, 2020
childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/response-brief-filed-in-landmark-case-against-fcc-on-5g-and-wireless-health-impacts/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=4
(There was a virtual press conference on 10/20 which I missed, but you can still see what it was about (it covered some very vital issues) by reading the following. KUDOS to RFK Jr. and team!! :clapping: )
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/chd-v-fcc-press-conf-response-10.20-800x417.png

"WASHINGTON, DC, October 20, 2020—Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the children’s health advocacy group headed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., filed its response to the Federal Communications Commission’s brief on Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

CHD’s case against the FCC is challenging the agency’s refusal to review its 25-year-old obsolete wireless “health guidelines” and to adopt scientific, biologically-based radio frequency emissions rules that adequately protect public health. CHD is represented by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Scott W. McCollough. The brief was filed jointly with Environmental Health Trust.

The response brief is a response to the FCC brief that was filed on September 22nd. CHD’s principal brief was filed on August 14, 2020.

The Petitioner’s response brief accuses the FCC of failing to “meaningfully assess the vast amount of reliable peer-reviewed scientific and medical evidence generated after 1996 indicating current and potential health risks from exposure at currently-authorized levels” of the radiation emitted by wireless sources such as cell phones, Wi-Fi, cell towers and 5G technologies at levels well below current FCC emission limits.

Petitioners claim that FCC’s irresponsible refusal to confront the evidence has resulted in widespread sickness, including in children. The petitioners assert that the FCC’s disdain for human suffering reflects a disturbingly distorted view of the public interest.

The FCC guidelines are based on the premise that wireless radiation is not harmful unless it is causing thermal change in tissue. The brief shows that these guidelines are based on obsolete and disproven assumptions which ignore human biology and are promoted by engineers and those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

The brief provided evidence showing that to justify its position, the FCC used unauthorized materials, misconstrued evidence brought by the petitioners, and misrepresented other government agencies’ positions.

The brief also claims that the FCC gave “inappropriate weight to unreliable and conflicted views and opinions by industry-supported sources” such as the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the inter-related World Health Organization’s EMF Project. The brief quoted decisions from Italy, one by the Italian Supreme Court that found a causal link between cell phones and brain tumors, and a 2020 Appellate Court decision which stated that experts with ICNIRP affiliations “lacked credibility and authority, and as such, were essentially outside the scientific community.” The brief argues that organizations like ICNIRP may be “influential” but represent a minority view.

The scientific consensus is different than the one represented by the FCC. The evidence in the brief shows that the majority of experts, as represented by the BioInitiative working group and its report and by the EMF Scientist’s Appeal, agree that the radiation emitted by wireless sources was proven to harm humans and the environment.

The brief claims that the FCC and the FDA’s dismissal of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) study is indefensible. The NTP’s FDA-funded $30 million study found clear evidence of cancer and DNA damage. The FDA opinion that the results cannot be extrapolated to humans is contrary to the FDA’s own protocols and was rejected by numerous experts. The World Health Organization’s IARC already classified wireless radiation as a “possible” (2B) carcinogen in 2011. Scientists argue that the NTP and the Ramazzini Institute study, another large-scale animal study, provide the “missing link” needed to classify wireless radiation as a human carcinogen. Courts, including Italy’s Supreme Court, already determined that cell phones can cause brain tumors.

The former head of the National Institute of Environmental and Health Sciences (NIEHS), Dr. Linda Birnbaum, supports the case. In a statement that was included in an Amicus Brief, she refuted the FDA and the FCC’s position and stated that “overall, the NTP findings demonstrate the potential for RFR to cause cancer in humans.” The National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) also filed an Amicus Brief in support of the petitioners.

The brief concludes by accusing the FCC of “obstinacy” and “willful blindness.” The brief further strengthens CHD’s claims that the FCC’s decision is capricious, arbitrary, not evidence-based and an abuse of discretion as defined under the Administrative Procedures Act.

“Children’s Health Defense is committed to protecting children from toxic exposures. The FCC’s brief provides further evidence that it is a captured agency that puts the interests of telecom ahead of the health of children,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel at Children’s Health Defense. “We are committed to making our government accountable, and giving a voice to injured children, their parents, their doctors, and the scientists who have spoken out for justice on this issue.”

In response to the FCC’s denial of “Radiation Sickness” Dafna Tachover, CHD’s director of its 5G and Wireless Harms Project said, “The FCC failed to address early signs of a problem, and now the sickness is widespread. Nevertheless, the FCC continues to perpetuate alleged uncertainty and marginalize those who have been injured. There is no uncertainty. The situation of those who have been injured, including children, is desperate especially with the unprecedented deployment of 5G. We hope this case will give visibility to an invisible problem.”

“In my 50 years working in public health, I’ve seen numerous public health failures,” said Prof. David Carpenter, MD, Director of the Institute for Health and Environment at the University of Albany and a Petitioner in the case. “Many are a result of government agencies’ reliance on industry-friendly science committees. The failure to protect the public health from wireless radiation is, in my opinion, the worst failure.” Carpenter is also the co-editor of the BioInitiative Report, the most extensive review of the science on wireless health impacts written by 29 of the world’s leading scientists.

Background on FCC’s Safety Guidelines and the decision leading to this case

In 1996, the FCC adopted safety guidelines which only protect consumers from thermal levels of radiation emitted by wireless devices and infrastructure, ignoring substantial evidence of profound harm from non-thermal levels. The FCC has not reviewed these guidelines since then, despite clear scientific evidence and growing rates of radio frequency-related sickness. In 2012, the Government Accountability Office of Congress published a report recommending that the FCC re-assess its guidelines. As a result, in 2013, the FCC opened docket 13-84 asking for public comment. Despite overwhelming evidence submitted by hundreds of individuals and scientists, which indicated an urgent need for new, biologically based rules, the FCC decided not to review its guidelines. Consequently, on February 3, Children’s Health Defense filed a lawsuit challenging the FCC’s decision. (Read the short press release. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/10-20-20-2020-10-20_CHD-FCC-PR-_FINAL-to-Cision.pdf)"

# # #

Children’s Health Defense is devoted to the health of people and our planet. Our mission is to end the childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and establish safeguards so this never happens again.

Lunesoleil

26th October 2020, 10:51

lF5XAsG5lEw

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: Sends a Powerful Message for Freedom and Hope to the World - 10/24/2020

Today, October 24, 2020, there are many gatherings around the world. Activists from these countries unite to speak with one voice: Germany, Argentina, Bolivia, Peru, Uruguay, Italy, Poland, Belgium, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, France and Austria.

Citizens of all countries are paying a huge price for the epidemic. They not only lost their loved ones, but also their freedoms, their livelihoods, their joy. Children and young people are also suffering from this crisis. Without their friends and social activities, mental health problems among our young people are reaching an unprecedented level. All over the world, people are asking to be spared from the devastating consequences of the epidemic.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, President of Children's Health Defense, Delivers Inspirational Message for Freedom and Hope to Activists Around the World

greybeard

28th October 2020, 12:43

Charlie Ward talks to 5G expert
A product for sale in the video description
Chris

https://drcharlieward.com/5g-danger-emf-protection/

ExomatrixTV

29th October 2020, 16:03

1321841672729276416

⚠️ The Big Tech Lobby pushing #5G on both sides is enormous and if Trump would not represent the "bi-partisan majority vote" he would face endless lawsuits and called a "dictator" ...

People who assume it is Trump "who is behind it all" are in my view beyond stupid & pathetic in my book.

It is never "Trump's FCC" never is never was ... as he himself is NOT a "science expert" nor an "health expert" he is just TOLD "what to do" just like ALL other Presidents before him.

There are many Republicans and many Democrats on BOTH sides PUSHING #5G long long time ... they represent the majority (not Trump).

Quote: "Trump FCC's Latest Lies" unquote. is not correct nor was it "Obama's FCC" as we are ruled by Bi-Partisan Technocracy Lobbyists like: Google, Apple, IBM, AT&T, Verizon, Samsung etc. etc. and most of these Big-Tech Lobbyists are Pro Democrats thus Bi-Partisan 5G insanity is inevitable.

John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

Hughe

22nd November 2020, 02:49

5G antennas may be banned at French airports and nearby residential areas as they could interfere with aircraft altimeters. Poor old telcos! They deplore the fact that this could set off a whole new round of conspiracy theories about 5G. So let's go for it folks!

L'installation des antennes 5G risque de n'être pas permise non seulement dans les aéroports mais aussi dans les agglomérations qui se trouvent à proximité. Les pauvres opérateurs ! Ils se plaignent en particulier que cette histoire risque de faire repartir de plus belle les théories du complot sur la 5G. Alors, allons-y, mes amis ! (Version française se trouve en bas et ci-jointe.)
5G: Civil aviation sparks controversy with telecoms companies

Are 5G antennas installed at airports likely to disrupt guidance systems inside aircraft? This is what the DGAC (French Civil Aviation Authority) is suggesting, based on a report stating that the 3.7-3.9 GHz band to be used for 5G could create a "major risk" for aircraft radio altimeters, which also use these frequencies.

This objection from civil aviation has angered the telecoms companies as it may result in antennas not being allowed to be installed not only in airports but also in nearby urban areas. "Additional technical analyses are being undertaken to ensure the compatibility of these 5G antennas with the needs of civil aviation," said Philippe Barnola, DGAC Deputy Director.

The four telecoms companies (Orange, SFR, Bouygues Telecoms and Free) were all the more put out by the announcement coming after the frequency auctions that raised 2.786 billion euros for the state.

"In the end, it's exhausting"

They sent a letter to Cédric O, Minister in charge of Digitisation and Electronic Communications, expressing their amazement at hearing of this risk and discussing the ramifications.

According to Les Echos, SFR (Altice Group, which also owns BFM Business and BFMTV) threatened "not to pay the 118 million euros due to the state until the situation is resolved". For its part, Bouygues Telecom demanded to be compensated "in proportion to these new constraints".

Contacted by AFP [Agence France presse], SFR did not provide a comment, while Bouygues Telecom said it had not asked for "any compensation", but that "this complexity should be taken into account" in the deployment of 5G.

"Having reservations is legitimate, but 7% of the world is already covered in 5G. There has never been a single problem with planes," one telco told Les Echos. "In the end, it's exhausting. This situation could set off a whole new round of conspiracy theories about 5G".

Telcos also say that they should have been told about this situation earlier. They submitted their first applications for authorization for 5G antennas in the 3.5 GHz band a few days after the end of the auction, on 20 October, and the first responses to the telecoms companies were made Thursday, said the DGAC.

5G : l'aviation civile ouvre une polémique avec les opérateurs
https://www.lesechos.fr/tech-medias/hightech/5g-les-operateurs-telecoms-sont-furieux-apres-le-veto-des-aeroports-1266848

Les antennes 5G installées dans les aéroports risquent-elle de perturber les systèmes de guidage à l'intérieur des avions? C'est ce que soulève la DGAC (direction générale de l'aviation civile) en s'appuyant sur un rapport affirmant que la bande des 3,7-3,9 Gigaghertz utilisable pour la 5G pourrait créer un "risque majeur" pour les radioaltimètres des avions qui passent aussi par ces fréquences.

Cette réserve de l'aviation civile a provoqué la colère des opérateurs. En effet, elle risque de ne pas permettre d'installer des antennes non seulement dans les aéroports mais aussi dans les agglomérations qui se trouvent à proximité.

"Des analyses techniques complémentaires sont en cours pour s'assurer de la compatibilité de ces stations 5G avec les besoins de l'aviation civile", a précisé aux Echos Philippe Barnola, sous directeur à la DGAC.

Cette annonce a d'autant plus heurté les quatre opérateurs (Orange, SFR, Bouygues Telecoms et Free) après les enchères de fréquences qui ont permis à l'Etat d'engranger 2,786 milliards d'euros.

"A la fin, c'est usant"

Il ont adressé une lettre à Cédric O, ministre chargé du Numérique et des Communications électroniques, pour l'informer de leur étonnement sur ce risque et prévenir des conséquences.

Selon Les Echos, SFR (groupe Altice, également propriétaire de BFM Business et BFMTV) menacerait "de ne pas verser les 118 millions d'euros dus à l'État tant que la situation n'est pas résolue". De son côté, Bouygues Telecom exigerait d'être indemnisé "à proportion de ces nouvelles contraintes".

Contactés par l'AFP, SFR n'a pas fait de commentaire, tandis que Bouygues Telecom a indiqué n'avoir demandé "aucune indemnisation", mais la "prise en compte de cette complexité" dans le cadre du déploiement de la 5G.

"Avoir des réserves, c'est légitime, mais 7 % du monde est déjà couvert en 5G. Il n'y a jamais eu le moindre problème avec les avions", a répondu un opérateur aux Echos. "A la fin, c'est usant. Le risque, avec cette histoire, c'est que les théories du complot sur la 5G ne repartent de plus belle".

Les opérateurs disent aussi avoir été mis face cette situation tardivement. Ils ont soumis leurs premières demandes d'autorisation pour les antennes 5G dans la bande 3,5 GhZ quelques jours après la fin des enchères le 20 octobre et les premiers retours ont été faits jeudi aux opérateurs, précise la DGAC.

Hughe

24th November 2020, 23:14

Tutzing, Bavaria, Germany adopts 5G moratorium
https://www.diagnose-funk.org/publikationen/artikel/detail?newsid=1627

AUTOMATIC (VERY ROUGH) TRANSLATION

Tutzing (Starnberger see): Green, Free voters, the SPD and the ÖDP decide a Moratorium for 5G+
Council calls for technology assessment, Preparedness, and mobile concept

In Tutzing (Bavaria) by setting four groups for a Moratorium on the high-frequency technology. The Süddeutsche Zeitung reported:

"Transmission equipment for mobile radio technology, with more than 3.8 GHz supports the municipality on the entire municipal territory, including their properties in the future, only "if the safety of people and environment by industry and government is proven by independent scientists to reliably". This Moratorium, initiated by the citizens initiative for 5G-free Tutzing, went through on Tuesday in the municipal Council with 10:8 votes.At the same time as comprehensively as possible to ensure, powerful, and as far as possible, on fixed network technology based broadband Tutzings and its districts. In addition, if you want to develop, with the experts in a "mobile precautionary approach" - is to minimize a positive planning, where plants could be set up for the purposes of the municipality, the pollution of citizens.In the emotional debate, the Doctor and a Councilor of the Free voters, Verena Jordan-Marstrander, pointed out that there is yet "no evidence for the safety" of high frequency mobile radio technology. You have "significant health concerns". Autonomous Driving, real-time transfers, and new devices - "do we need this? We want to do that?", you asked ... ÖDP-councillor Caroline pitcher that followed for many years is critical to the mobile development at the place, knocked on the precautionary principle.Accordingly, the community of the existence must bear - such as the health care of their citizens. Jug according to 700 Tutzinger have signed the appeal for the Moratorium, including 40 professionals."(12.11.2020)

The FDP and CSU criticized the decision sharply.

Source and more information: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/starnberg/mobilfunk-kritischer-umgang-mit-5g-1.5112864
The decision of the municipal Council leads the network to discussions. The citizens ' initiative responds based on the allegations, the criticism of 5G is based on unfounded, Yes, esoteric statements.

Citizens ' initiative 5G-free Tutzing on 13.11.2020 - 21:47
Only the specified contribution helps, unfortunately, not an industry-independent representation of the Pros and Cons, quite the contrary! The specified source is not obtained in any case, the impression of a scientifically sound analysis.
Why the high number of scientific studies, as well as for example. Findings of the technology, it is not a result of Committee of the Federal government, the Scientific service of the European Parliament, to name just a few, as esoteric estimate is for us to understand.

(1) A technology assessment has not yet taken place. The HEAD of the technology Committee OF the Bundestag, Prof. Armin Grunwald, the consequences of 5G called a "Experiment on people". ( see Prof. Armin Grunwald, head of the office for technology assessment at the German Bundestag, July 2019, available at https://kurzelinks.de/hv8f)

(2) On the basis of the classification of the previous technique, the radiation from a 2G (GSM), 3G (UMTS), 4G (LTE) and Wi-Fi as a "possible carcinogen" (category 2B) by the IARC of the WHO scientific services of the European Union in policy papers for the members warn of the potential health risks of 5G.

(3) the SCIENTIFIC SERVICE OF the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT in February 2020 on 5G there is no evidence as to its safety. "The current scientific literature shows that there is a permanently acting wireless radiation probably has biological effects, which is the case for the special features of the 5G in a special way: the combination of millimeter-wave, a higher frequency, the number of transmitters and the number of Connections.Various studies suggest that 5G the health of people, plants, animals, insects and microbes would affect – and that 5G a cautious approach would be appropriate, since it is an untested technology is." cf. ibid. (Briefing of the EPRS), p. 1, document available at https://kurzelinks.de/f0w7

(4) Interestingly, recommends that even the PRESIDENT OF the GERMAN FEDERAL office FOR radiation protection (BfS), Fr. Dr. Inge Paulini in 3sat on 25.02.2019 a cautious approach under a provisional exemption of "sensitive places" of 5G.
Video available at https://www.3sat.de/wissen/nano/gefahr-fuer-die-gesundheit-100.html?mode=play&obj=79212 (available to 26.02.2024)

(5) it is Interesting that the French city of Lille for a Moratorium on 5G decides about 600 municipalities in Italy, the million cities of Marseille and Lyon, in addition to other 9 cities in France with a 5G-expansion of stop demand, as Brussels and Geneva. (cf. https://www.diagnose-funk.org/publikationen/artikel/detail&newsid=1613)

(6) For further Research, I also recommend "what time is it in Germany again a radiation protection?", Open letter with options for action to the President of the Federal office for radiation protection, Dr. Inge Paulini, by Jörn Gutbier / Peter Hensinger, diagnosis:radio e. V., p. 2 and p. 3, document available at https://kurzelinks.de/vtzw

Come with questions to us: Tutzing@posteo.de">5G-freiesTutzing@posteo.de
For more information and resources see also under https://www.5g-freies-tutzing.de

Source: on-the-spot News Tutzing: https://www.vorort.news/tutzing/kommunalpolitik/2020/11/11/tutzing-verlangt-nachweis-fuer-5g-unbedenklichkeit/

¤=[Post Update]=¤

French Court of Appeal: Installation of "smart" meters is not mandatory in European law

Good news from France about "smart" meters. The Court of Appeal of Bordeaux, France, has confirmed that the installation of a "smart" meter is not mandatory. The court has stated that,

"Contrary to what is claimed by Enedis [a French electricity company], no legal or regulatory text, European or national, requires Enedis, a private commercial company, public service concession-holder, to install smart meters at the homes of individuals".
This confirmation benefits all consumers, even non-victims of microwaves.

The court also recognized an unlawful function added to the "smart" meter by Enedis which, according to the former director of the "smart" meter programme, enabled surveillance of the starting or stopping of certain appliances in the home, such as a dishwasher.

The court ruled as follows: "This function, described as "intrusive" by Enedis' opposing parties, is confirmed by the publication of the university thesis carried out under a contract with the Research and Development Department of Smart Meters, which states that "The characteristics of the electrical consumption of a device in the short moment after it is turned on can be used to identify the device". "[...] It must therefore be held that Enedis failed to fulfil its obligation to provide information as defined by the provisions of Article L. 111-1 of the Consumer Code."

So here we have the elements of rights that we have talked so much about. Accordingly: no penalty on refusal to allow the installation of a "smart" meter.
Fees for manual readings of meters will be slightly increased to about € 30 per year, instead of about € 21 usually.

No charge can be made for installation because it is already included in the ENEDIS contract for the maintenance of the network, and it is even less justified if you refused the "smart" meter.

Thanks to STOP LINKY VAR & PACA for this good news

https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk/mr/F6zRQtsvJ1c2z9lk7hdCpu3L5kMYC_yJ5htegLS85rxyNPdjPRgLTbgGcXLKbD9FTaCF_hUgeDZqC3LvwobOpR8MXODCzSBpER9c BL4BsGrnZw4

Version française originelle disponible à https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk/mr/F6zRQtsvJ1c2z9lk7hdCpu3L5kMYC_yJ5htegLS85rxyNPdjPRgLTbgGcXLKbD9FTaCF_hUgeDZqC3LvwobOpR8MXODCzSBpER9c BL4BsGrnZw4

Une bonne nouvelle à vous annoncer, une fois n'est pas coutume. !
La Cour d'appel de Bordeaux confirme que l'installation du Linky n'est pas obligatoire.

En effet, la Cour rappelle que : «contrairement à ce qu'affirme la société Enedis, aucun texte légal ou règlementaire, européen ou national n'impose à Enedis, société commerciale privée, concessionnaire du service public, d'installer au domicile des particuliers des compteurs Linky ».

Cette affirmation bénéficie à tous les consommateurs, même non-victimes des ondes.

La Cour reconnaît par ailleurs une fonction illicite ajoutée au Linky par Enedis qui permet, de l'aveu-même de l'ancien directeur du programme Linky, de visualiser le démarrage ou l'arrêt de certaines installations du domicile, comme un lave-vaisselle.

La Cour tranche :«Cette fonction, qualifiée d'"intrusive" par les parties adverses d'Enedis, est confirmée par la publication de la thèse universitaire réalisée dans le cadre d'un contrat avec le service de Recherche et Développement de Linky qui affirme que "les caractéristiques de la consommation électrique d'un appareil pendant le court instant qui suit sa mise sous tension peuvent être utilisées à l'identification de l'appareil". [...] Dès lors, il y a lieu de considérer que la société Enedis a failli à son obligation d'information telle que définie par les dispositions de l'article L.111-1 du code de la consommation. ».

Voici donc confirmés les éléments de droits dont nous vous avons tant parlé. En conséquence : aucune pénalité sur le refus.

La relève à pied sera légèrement augmentée environ 30 € par an, au lieu de 21 € environ habituellement.

La pose ne pourra vous être facturée car déjà incluse dans le contrat d'ENEDIS pour l'entretien du réseau, et donc encore moins si vous l'avez refusé.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Good news from France about "smart" meters. The Court of Appeal of Bordeaux, France, has confirmed that the installation of a "smart" meter is not mandatory. The court has stated that,

"Contrary to what is claimed by Enedis [a French electricity company], no legal or regulatory text, European or national, requires Enedis, a private commercial company, public service concession-holder, to install smart meters at the homes of individuals".
This confirmation benefits all consumers, even non-victims of microwaves.

The court also recognized an unlawful function added to the "smart" meter by Enedis which, according to the former director of the "smart" meter programme, enabled surveillance of the starting or stopping of certain appliances in the home, such as a dishwasher.

The court ruled as follows: "This function, described as "intrusive" by Enedis' opposing parties, is confirmed by the publication of the university thesis carried out under a contract with the Research and Development Department of Smart Meters, which states that "The characteristics of the electrical consumption of a device in the short moment after it is turned on can be used to identify the device". "[...] It must therefore be held that Enedis failed to fulfil its obligation to provide information as defined by the provisions of Article L. 111-1 of the Consumer Code."

So here we have the elements of rights that we have talked so much about. Accordingly: no penalty on refusal to allow the installation of a "smart" meter.
Fees for manual readings of meters will be slightly increased to about € 30 per year, instead of about € 21 usually.

No charge can be made for installation because it is already included in the ENEDIS contract for the maintenance of the network, and it is even less justified if you refused the "smart" meter.

Thanks to STOP LINKY VAR & PACA for this good news

https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Version française originelle disponible à https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Une bonne nouvelle à vous annoncer, une fois n'est pas coutume. !
La Cour d'appel de Bordeaux confirme que l'installation du Linky n'est pas obligatoire.

En effet, la Cour rappelle que : «contrairement à ce qu'affirme la société Enedis, aucun texte légal ou règlementaire, européen ou national n'impose à Enedis, société commerciale privée, concessionnaire du service public, d'installer au domicile des particuliers des compteurs Linky ».

Cette affirmation bénéficie à tous les consommateurs, même non-victimes des ondes.

La Cour reconnaît par ailleurs une fonction illicite ajoutée au Linky par Enedis qui permet, de l'aveu-même de l'ancien directeur du programme Linky, de visualiser le démarrage ou l'arrêt de certaines installations du domicile, comme un lave-vaisselle.

La Cour tranche :«Cette fonction, qualifiée d'"intrusive" par les parties adverses d'Enedis, est confirmée par la publication de la thèse universitaire réalisée dans le cadre d'un contrat avec le service de Recherche et Développement de Linky qui affirme que "les caractéristiques de la consommation électrique d'un appareil pendant le court instant qui suit sa mise sous tension peuvent être utilisées à l'identification de l'appareil". [...] Dès lors, il y a lieu de considérer que la société Enedis a failli à son obligation d'information telle que définie par les dispositions de l'article L.111-1 du code de la consommation. ».

Voici donc confirmés les éléments de droits dont nous vous avons tant parlé. En conséquence : aucune pénalité sur le refus.

La relève à pied sera légèrement augmentée environ 30 € par an, au lieu de 21 € environ habituellement.

La pose ne pourra vous être facturée car déjà incluse dans le contrat d'ENEDIS pour l'entretien du réseau, et donc encore moins si vous l'avez refusé.

Hughe

26th November 2020, 22:38

CLAIRE EDWARDS INTERVIEW
lXdcULTaa60

--

My comment:

- 5G is part of the depopulation agenda.
- Advancement of science and technology already made the corporations getting rid of ninety nine percent of work forces. One capable technician or operator can do the same quantity of work that required thousands of workers two decade ago.

onawah

28th November 2020, 00:43

Industry-Sponsored Journal Publishes Scientific Paper Questioning Safety of 5G Radiation
11/25/20
https://www.5gcrisis.com/post/industry-sponsored-journal-publishes-scientific-paper-questioning-safety-of-5g-radiation

"A new peer-reviewed paper, "Human Electromagnetic Field Exposure in 5G at 28 GHz," questions the safety of exposure to 5G millimeter waves.
The authors found in a simulation study that use of a 5G cell phone at 28 GHz could exceed ICNIRP (i.e. international) radio frequency exposure limits when held at 8 centimeters (i.e., 3 inches) or closer to the head or body.
Read Dr. Joel Moskowitz's commentary on the paper, as well as key excerpts from the original paper, here:
https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-wireless-technology-is-5g-harmful-to.html
Dr. Moskowitz is the Director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health."

Rawhide68

28th November 2020, 20:42

Klaus Schwabb what a guy, the film industry turned him down, the next James Bond film was just not in reach for him.
So he took it out on "te world" instead.

Academy of Fine Arts Vienna "In 1907 and 1908, young Adolf Hitler, who had come from Linz, was twice denied admission to the drawing class."
So he took it out on "te world" instead.

ExomatrixTV

28th November 2020, 20:51

Project Pandora?
_uMlxZ6ei5U
DOCTORS WARNING! ""No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe":
OeGT72WhVEc

backup video:

https://archive.org/download/youtube-OeGT72WhVEc/DOCTORS_WARNING_No_Reason_to_Believe_5G_Is_Safe-OeGT72WhVEc.mp4

source (https://altcensored.com/watch?v=OeGT72WhVEc)

ExomatrixTV

28th November 2020, 21:21

Nurse: ‘Covid’ was a Lie, but now people are ‘throwing blood clots’ all over - David Icke:

VHh2APZOGCYi

onawah

16th December 2020, 16:49

Landmark 5G Study Highlights Health Threats
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 16, 2020

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Newest data from the New Hampshire legislative commission confirms wireless technology produces significant negative effect on humans, animals, insects and plants
In the race for hyperfast internet speed and connectivity, experts are making comparisons between the release of 5G and the lies told by the tobacco and oil industries
The structure required to support 5G will place cell antenna ports close to your home and workplace, making it nearly impossible to avoid and raising your risk of excessive oxidative stress that may lead to anxiety, depression and Alzheimer's
It is important to get involved in helping to prevent implementation of 5G by contacting your local lawmakers and signing local petitions. Consider taking steps in your home to reduce exposure

Flying under the radar, so to speak, during the media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, is the rollout of a hyperfast speed 5G wireless network. As millions of Americans are suddenly working remotely, it has proven to be a powerful opportunity for regulators to move 5G forward. Yet, in the face of expanding wireless connections, a landmark study recommends reducing exposure.

Despite concern by many experts, the implementation is moving forward under the guise of bringing a faster and more efficient internet, at any cost. The term 5G stands for the fifth generation of wireless access, which Jonathon Adelstein, head of the Wireless Infrastructure Association, characterizes as “4G on steroids.”1 The association represents nearly 200 companies in the telecommunications industry.2

However, Adelstein’s characterization of 4G on steroids is not quite accurate. While the 4G network uses under 6 gigahertz (GHz) on the radio frequency spectrum, 5G will occupy from 30 GHz to 300 GHz, which are shorter millimeter wavelengths.3 The health effects of consistent exposure to pulses of these wavelengths have not been thoroughly studied, but the initial evidence shows it is likely dangerous.

If faster speed and reliability are truly the end goals, then fiber optic connections are a far better and safer way forward. It's not the faster speeds of 5G that are of concern to scientists but, rather, the distribution of wireless data when in most cases it could be routed more easily and less expensively over fiber optic cables.

Newest Data Confirms Past Evidence
Following the passage of New Hampshire House Bill 522, the New Hampshire legislative Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology was formed.4 The commission was engaged to “study the environmental and health effects of 5G wireless technology in 2019.”5

The commission was made up of 13 members whose education included epidemiology, occupational health, toxicology, physics, engineering electromagnetics and a representative from the wireless industry. As quoted from EMF Safety Network, the commission was asked to answer eight pointed questions, including:6

Why thousands of peer-reviewed radiofrequency (RF) studies that show a wide range of health effects, including DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility and many other ailments, have been ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)
Why the FCC guidelines do not account for health effects of wireless technology
Why the FCC RF limits are 100 times higher than those in other countries
Why the FCC is ignoring the World Health Organization classification of wireless as a possible carcinogen
Why, when the world’s leading scientists signed an appeal to protect public health from wireless radiation, nothing has been done
The commission heard from experts and ultimately all except the telecommunication representative acknowledged that RF radiation coming from wireless devices had an effect on humans, animals, insects and plants. The commission wrote:7

“There is mounting evidence that DNA damage can occur from radiation outside of the ionizing part of the spectrum. The Commission heard arguments on both sides of this issue with many now saying there are findings showing biological effects in this range. This argument gets amplified as millimeter waves within the microwave range are beginning to be utilized.”

Their first recommendation was “an independent review of the current RF standards of the electromagnetic radiation in the 300MHz to 300GHz microwave spectrum” to assess the health risks that were linked to cellular communications.8

The remaining recommendations included those that would reduce an individual's exposure to the 5G network and increase the public's knowledge and awareness of their exposure.

Included was a shorter minority report written by the business and industry representative and the telecommunications representative, who were not in agreement with the majority of experts. The EMF Safety Network wrote, “This minority report parrots the language of the telecommunications industry and exposes their agenda to ignore science and continue to confuse the public.”9

Safety Is Taking a Backseat to Speed

W2EyQp7GP68

In much the same way the tobacco industry convinced the public that smoking was not dangerous, so is the telecommunications industry selling the public on speed over safety. In the interview above with Greater Earth Media, IT professional Jon Humphrey made the glaringly obvious comparison between the actions of telecommunication, tobacco and leaded gas industries, saying:10

“So, they know the technology is dangerous and that's why they're just trying to get as much of it out there as they can before they're finally held accountable. Sadly, we've seen this all before.

We saw it with big tobacco, we saw it with leaded gas and in every single case the big corporations did what they always do — they lied and then they paid off politicians and they paid scientists and they silenced people and discredited them and sadly they did get away with a lot of it and that's what we need to make sure doesn't happen with 5G.”

The promise is that speeds will be from 10 to 100 times faster than 4G running primarily on millimeter-wave (MMW) bandwidth. According to EMF coach and author Lloyd Burrell, the signals will likely be weaker since the wavelengths do not penetrate buildings and tend to be incorporated into rain and plants. To adjust, the 5G network will use:11

“… smaller cell stations (and the technology of beamforming) that’ll scramble/unscramble and redirect packets of data on a no-interference path back to us. This could mean wireless antennas on every lamp post, utility pole, home and business throughout entire neighborhoods, towns and cities.”

This requires a new infrastructure mounting 5G cell stations on existing structures, such as utility poles. During U.S. Senate hearings on the topic, when asked about the safety studies on these small cell stations, representatives from the industry stated they were not aware if any such studies existed.12

This led Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., to say, “So there really is no research ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here.” An article published in Scientific American by Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., director for the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley, identified another challenge:13

“5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.”

How Is 5G Different From 4G?

GEx_d0SjvS0

As explained in this video by IEEE Spectrum, part of a large organization devoted to engineering, there are several differences between 4G and 5G technology. Considering there are already many who struggle with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with additional radio frequencies will only add to this once rare affliction.

One of the significant problems with the technology is that it relies primarily on MMW, which is known to penetrate human tissue up to 2 millimeters, where it is absorbed by the surface of the cornea and is conducted by sweat glands within the skin.14 Each of these factors leads to an association with a number of potential health problems.

For example, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is using MMW in crowd control weapons called the Active Denial System because it produces a severe burning sensation. The DOD writes, "The Active Denial System generates a focused and very directional millimeter-wave radio frequency beam."15

MMW is also known to suppress your immune function16 and increase cellular stress, harmful free radicals, learning deficits17 and, potentially, bacterial antibiotic resistance.18 There is nothing to suggest that 5G will produce less harm than the current technology, and there are thousands of studies demonstrating the harmful effects from that.

Research by Martin Pall, Ph.D., details how excessive oxidative stress triggered by microwave exposure from wireless technology can lead to reproductive harm and neurological disorders, such as anxiety, depression, autism and Alzheimer's.19

Without the Choice to Opt-Out, What Can You Do?
Once it’s installed in your neighborhood, you won’t have a choice to opt out of 5G exposure. “5G will be virtually everywhere, with the options of being able to simply “get away from it” being very limited as millions of small cell devices are rolled out,” Humphrey says.20

There’s no doubt in my mind that microwave radiation from wireless technologies is a significant health hazard that needs to be addressed if you’re concerned about your health. Unfortunately, the rollout of 5G will make remedial action difficult, which is why we all need to get involved and do what we can to prevent it in the first place, such as contacting your local lawmakers and signing local petitions.

Below are several suggestions to help reduce your exposure and mitigate the damage from wireless technology. In addition, you can download a free chapter from my book, “EMF*D,” that summarizes many of the major recommendations. This is handy to keep on your desktop as a reference as you’re making changes in your home.

Identify major sources of EMF in your home, such as your cellphone, cordless phones, Wi-Fi routers, Bluetooth headsets and other Bluetooth-equipped items, wireless mice, keyboards, smart thermostats, baby monitors, smart meters and the microwave in your kitchen. Ideally, address each source and determine how you can best limit their use.

Barring a life-threatening emergency, children should not use a cellphone or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cellphone radiation than adults due to having thinner skull bones and developing immune systems and brains.

Research also demonstrates that infants under the age of 1 do not effectively learn language from videos, and do not transfer what they learn from the iPad to the real world, so it’s a mistake to think electronic devices provide valuable educational experiences.21

Connect your desktop computer to the internet via a wired Ethernet connection and be sure to put your desktop in airplane mode. Also avoid wireless keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and portable house phones. Opt for the wired versions.

If you must use Wi-Fi, shut it off when not in use, especially at night when you are sleeping. Ideally, work toward hardwiring your house so you can eliminate Wi-Fi altogether. If you have a notebook without any Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will allow you to connect to the internet with a wired connection.

Avoid using wireless chargers for your cellphone, as they too will increase EMFs throughout your home. Wireless charging is also far less energy efficient than using a dongle attached to a power plug, as it draws continuous power (and emits EMF) whether you’re using it or not.

Shut off the electricity to your bedroom at night. This typically works to reduce electrical fields from the wires in your wall unless there is an adjoining room next to your bedroom. If that is the case, you will need to use a meter to determine if you also need to turn off power in the adjacent room.

Use a battery-powered alarm clock, ideally one without any light. I use a talking clock for the visually impaired.22

If you still use a microwave oven, consider replacing it with a steam convection oven, which will heat your food as quickly and far more safely.

Avoid using “smart” appliances and thermostats that depend on wireless signaling. This includes all new “smart” TVs as they emit a Wi-Fi signal and, unlike your computer, you cannot shut the Wi-Fi signal off. Consider using a large computer monitor as your TV instead, as they don’t emit Wi-Fi.

Refuse a smart meter on your home as long as you can, or add a shield to an existing smart meter, some of which have been shown to reduce radiation as much as 98%.23

Consider moving your baby’s bed into your room instead of using a wireless baby monitor. Alternatively, use a hard-wired monitor.

Replace CFL bulbs with incandescent bulbs. Ideally remove all fluorescent lights from your house. Not only do they emit unhealthy light, but more importantly, they transfer current to your body just being close to the bulbs.

Avoid carrying your cellphone on your body unless in airplane mode and never sleep with it in your bedroom unless it is in airplane mode. Even in airplane mode it can emit signals, which is why I put my phone in a Faraday bag.24

When using your cellphone, use the speaker phone and hold the phone at least 3 feet away from you. Seek to radically decrease your time on the cellphone. Instead, use VoIP software phones that you can use while connected to the internet via a wired connection.

Avoid using your cellphone and other electronic devices at least an hour (preferably several hours) before bed, as the blue light from the screen and EMFs both inhibit melatonin production.25,26 If you must use your phone make sure you have the blue light filters activated and have it in dark mode.

The effects of EMFs are reduced by calcium-channel blockers, so make sure you’re getting enough magnesium. Most people are deficient in magnesium, which will worsen the impact of EMFs.

Pall has published a paper suggesting that raising your level of Nrf2 may help ameliorate EMF damage.27 One simple way to activate Nrf2 is to consume Nrf2-boosting foods, such as cruciferous vegetables and fermented foods and beverages.28

Exercise, calorie restriction (such as intermittent fasting) and activating the nitric oxide signaling pathway (one way of doing that is the Nitric Oxide Dump exercise) will also raise Nrf2."

+ Sources and References
1 Youtube, Full Measure, September 15, 2019, minute 3:25
2 Wireless Infrastructure Association, Jonathan S. Adelstein
3 YouTube, Everything You Need to Know About 5G
4, 7, 8 State of New Hampshire, November 1, 2020
5, 6, 9 EMF Safety Network, Landmark 5g Study by New Hampshire Legislative Commission Recommends Reducing Wireless Exposure
10 YouTube, Greater Earth, July 4, 2019
11 Electric Sense, January 15, 2020
12 YouTube, February 16, 2019
13 Scientific American, October 17, 2019
14 Grassroots Environmental Education, 5th Generation (5G) Wireless Communication Fact Sheet
15 Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office, Active Denial System FAQs
16 Biofizika. 2002 Jan-Feb;47(1):71-7
17 Environmental Health Trust, September 13, 2017
18 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology June 2016; 100(11): 4761-4771
19 Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):43-51
20 Northwest Citizen, October 20, 2018
21 AAP.org, Growing Up Digital October 1, 2015
22 Amazon.com Talking Clock
23 IRDA.org March 22, 2020
24 Amazon.com Mission Darkness Faraday Bag for Phones
25 Journal of Advanced Research March 2013; 4(2): 181-187
26 Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb; 12(2): 2071–2087
27 Sheng Li Zue Bao 2015 Feb 25;67(1):1-18
28 PLOS|One, 2016, 11(2)

onawah

22nd December 2020, 04:30

Archive of 4,000 Documents Reveals Government Knew Decades Ago About Health Impact of Wireless Technology
12/21/20
By Dafna Tachover, Esq
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/government-knew-harmful-impact-wireless-technology-human-health/

"Researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving studies that examine the link between certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies. Scholars and the public are now invited to help review Glaser’s documents.

Zorach (Zory) Glaser Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR, is one of the most important scientists to study the impact of wireless technology on human health. His career as a government research scientist spans decades working for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Public Health Service, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Bureau of Radiological Health.

Glaser’s extensive archive of nearly 4,000 documents, now available to the public, provides clear evidence that the harmful effects of wireless were known long before cell phones and wireless technology were commercialized in the early 1980s.

The archive materials reveal that the U.S. government, particularly the military, knew for decades of the harm wireless technology can cause to human health. During World War II, the U.S. military started to use radar, and the use of radio telecommunications systems was growing.

Soldiers working with these systems, which use radio and microwave frequencies — the same frequencies used for wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi — began to complain of adverse health effects from exposure to the radiation emitted by these systems.

At the time, the illness experienced by these soldiers was referred to as “Radiation Sickness /Microwave Sickness.”

Glaser was assigned by the U.S. Navy’s Naval Medical Research Center to investigate. He spent about a decade collecting every study conducted within and outside the U.S. showing that the radiation emitted from radio frequencies (RFs) and microwave frequencies may cause adverse health effects.

Dr. Glaser’s report, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation,” was published in 1971. The report references more than 2,300 studies showing multiple adverse biological responses to radio- and microwave-frequency radiation.

Pages 5-12 of the report’s bibliography list these adverse effects, including damage to vital organs and other tissues and the central nervous system, physiological and psychological effects, blood and vascular disorders, metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders, and endocrine and histological changes.

Glaser’s 1976 updated report includes 3,700 studies which confirm the soldiers’ complaints.

At that time, it was mostly only military personnel who were exposed to high levels of microwaves and RF radiation and who developed Microwave/Radiation Sickness.

But today, the whole population is exposed to levels of radiation which are millions and sometimes billions of times higher than they were when Glaser started his work a few decades ago.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/HI-.png

The “Microwave Sickness” symptoms suffered then by the military personnel are now widely seen among growing numbers of people in the general population who are exposed to this electro-smog pollution from wireless devices. The sickness, also referred to as electro-sensitivity, is estimated to affect 10% of the general population.

Glasers’ studies and reports are of the utmost importance and relevance to existing harms from current wireless technology, including 5G, cell towers, Wi-Fi and cell phones which use the same type of frequencies and intensities as those studied by Glaser. For this reason Glaser’s reports have been crucial in supporting advocacy efforts and letting the public know that despite what the government and telecom say, there is more than ample evidence of harm from these exposures.A few years ago, when Glaser realized the importance of his archives, he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada. Havas, an associate professor of environmental and resource studies, has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology.

According to Havas, Glaser’s archive contains quite a few “gems.” “Zory was a packrat (his words) and he kept everything, Havas said. “I found one paper that was circulated to only nine people with health recommendations that were ignored.”

To make these important documents available to the public, Havas and her team have worked for years to scan all the documents and make them searchable. So far Havas’ team has scanned 20 out of the 25 boxes of Glaser’s archives.

Because of the archive’s magnitude, the public is invited to help review the documents. Scholars who are interested are invited to write short overviews of some of the more useful and relevant finds and post those overviews on Zory’s website. People who find important information are asked to let Havas know.

If you are interested in participating in this project, please contact Dr. Magda Havas (drmagdahavas@gmail.com) with a subject heading of “Zory’s Archive.”

onawah

25th December 2020, 23:47

[Special Report] The Plague of 5G (and how to survive it)
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com
9:34 AM (8 hours ago) 12/25/20
ElectricSense
132, Avenue de Rochefort
Royan Poitou Charentes 17200
FRANCE
From the email update today:

"I want to make sure you have my very special 15-page eGuide on protecting yourself, and your family, from 5G radiation.

In addition to this important eGuide, over the coming days and weeks I will be sharing important information on energetic and frequency healing, navigating electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and also bring you access to many of the world’s leading scientific minds on energy (good and bad).

Please click here for access to the eGuide, exploring some important realities:
5G is the latest “communication highway” coming at us from all directions - and soon it could support at least 100 billion devices - but like all highways (and technology), there is a downside.
What this comprehensive global digital connectivity means is we’re going to have radio-frequency microwave radiation blanketing and permeating our homes, schools, cities, counties and airspace like never before.
Learning to protect yourself (and your loved ones) from EMFs, 5G, Cell Phones (and more) is VITALLY important for your health and your peace of mind.
5G eGuide - Click Here for Free Download https://emffreereport.s3.amazonaws.com/5G-Protection-Report-Lloyd-Burrell-H.pdf
This succinct but powerful eGuide is about understanding the risks and how to avoid them.

To your good life and good health,

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. Anxious to know more? Click here to discover my solutions oriented book, offering the most profound education on this topic.
https://emffreereport.s3.amazonaws.com/5G-Protection-Report-Lloyd-Burrell-H.pdf
This is a comprehensive summary of the known and suspected effects of electromagnetic fields from everyday devices and appliances like cell phones, computers, wi-fi on humans, animals, and nature, offering a wealth of information, not only on the hazards, but also the practical solutions and insights that will benefit every man, woman, and child on the planet."

P.P.S if the above link doesn't work copy/paste this link into your browser: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/emf-practical-guide-hto/

ALSO . Click here for FREE access to six EMF expert excerpts :https://www.electricsense.com/6-science-backed-emf-solutions-thanks-excerpts-2/

onawah

28th December 2020, 05:42

$30 million US study finds “clear evidence of cancer” from cell phone radiation
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense lloyd@electric
12/27/20

(This is an ad for a book. I'm not benefiting from posting this in any way other than the satisfaction of sharing valuable information. In any case, the charge for the book is very reasonable, and even without buying the book, there is plenty of great free info on the ElectricSense site. No doubt the book is great too.)

"Did you know that using your cell phone just 30 minutes a day can increase your risk of getting a brain tumor by 40%?

Also, did you know that:
An extensive 10 year $30 million US federal study recently concluded “clear evidence of cancer” from cell phone radiation
Multiple studies link EMFs from cell phones and the like with chronic inflammation suffered by 60% of Americans
24 Hours of EMF exposure from electrical devices commonly found in your home can cause more DNA damage than 1,600 chest X-Rays
5G means the cell phone industry is installing millions of small cell antennas on lamp posts, buildings, and power poles all over the world (+13 million in the US alone) GREATLY increasing radiation levels
I know all this sounds scary, and it is kind of.

But there is something else I want you to know.

A lot of people think that because they can’t feel anything when they use their cell phone and other EMF devices, that they’re okay.

Not true.

“It’s not because you can’t feel Electromagnetic Fields that your cells can’t.”

This is the abundantly clear message from the thousands of independent studies carried out.
I'm not trying to scare you, I just want you to know the hard facts about these dangers and more importantly to share the solutions.

Because, fortunately there are solutions galore, which I’ve laid out in my complete EMF Practical Guide: The Simple Science of Protecting Yourself, Healing Chronic inflammation, and Living a Naturally Health life in Our Toxic Electromagnetic World.

Many other experts in the EMF field have given a lot of time and effort to endorse and support this book. In fact, leading alternative health advocate Dr. Joseph Mercola wrote the foreword.

I truly believe this package is the best investment you can make to protect yourself from 5G and EMFs.

Go to: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/emf-practical-guide-hto/

(If the above link doesn't work copy/paste it into your browser.)

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. the link to all the studies cited above can be found here:
https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/emf-practical-guide-hto/#scientific-ref
(just scroll to the bottom of the page). "

ElectricSense
132, Avenue de Rochefort
Royan Poitou Charentes 17200
FRANCE

greybeard

29th December 2020, 18:09

David Icke | What's Really Happening Globally 5G

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmCi68GWiUY

ExomatrixTV

29th December 2020, 22:35

1344012291612811266
source (https://twitter.com/libertytarian/status/1344012291612811266)

ExomatrixTV

29th December 2020, 23:00

5G Tech + A.I. ??

They Control Your Mind Through Your Very Own Virtual Avatar in a Digital Mirror World:
neOQNpxN0zs

JenMorri88

11th January 2021, 10:18

If someone nearby has links to links about the harm of 5g, I would like to read proven research in this area, I'm just looking here, but for a very long time I can't find

onawah

14th January 2021, 20:07

THE COMING SURVEILLANCE STATE AKA THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS--PATRICK WOOD
First published at 14:42 UTC on September 7th, 2020.
The Truth About COVID
430 subscribers

onawah

16th January 2021, 06:49

THE COMING SURVEILLANCE STATE AKA THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS--PATRICK WOOD
First published at 14:42 UTC on September 7th, 2020.
The Truth About COVID
430 subscribers

( Somehow I forgot to post the youtube address, and now I can't find it, but here is another one from Wood:
4QEgnc5kmdI

onawah

19th January 2021, 19:31

5G's impact on nature - flyer available
Email update today from 5G Crisis <report@5gcrisis.com> via gmail.mcsv.net
1/19/21
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/KZgBhkIbDY8yyFLLvMOc7cnKFRo4o6tcYWIYXJUnhp6fl5CXLPCgQ6zMpcNFRbC6GonjrroeSJYB60qRH3n1z6Kgu62Xbyc18kLp ssAxelHGezlYAIE8bSZ-VTzlRv5jduLUA6KRZshh3OQ2d5Rbg695ZQfFyg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b/images/c0360f11-e2c8-4c99-8a26-769e15b7c07f.png

"How 5G Could Dramatically Alter Our Natural World
Informational Flyer Available Now
While much of our educational and outreach work has focused on wireless radiation and its adverse effects on humans, a sizable body of research is developing which documents the alarming effects radio frequency (RF) radiation can have on the natural world.

This Take Action Tuesday, please share our informational flyer with your state environmental protection agency officials and local environmental committee members about the impacts RF radiation can have on bees and insects.

Access the Flyer HERE: https://8a6b8cd0-359b-4b1b-b042-cdb0cdb8be26.filesusr.com/ugd/2cea04_00d3c4115e824aed85a3047fbb06949f.pdf

Sample Email to State/Local Stewards of Environmental Protection:

Dear _______,

I am writing to alert you to the growing body of science regarding the disturbing effects 5G wireless radiation frequencies can have on our natural world.

Please see the informational flyer attached, which includes some of the science regarding bees and insects. Many more studies have examined the impacts on birds, trees and other aspects of the environment.

I respectfully urge [insert state department name or local environmental committee name] to investigate this issue further and advocate for communities to stop the deployment of 5G antennas until such time as the environmental effects of this new, powerful technology have been thoroughly examined and fully understood.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely, _________
As always, thank you for taking action. Together, we must continue to work diligently to protect public health and the environment from 5G and the greedy telecom industry.

-The 5G Crisis Team"

ExomatrixTV

27th January 2021, 09:34

⚠️ More 'Big Guns' Question 5G Safety 🦜🦋🌳

aWUMewO77gyh
source (http://bitchute.com/video/aWUMewO77gyh/)

gnostic9

28th January 2021, 19:52

Max Igan talks to Rinat Strahlhofer about the Stop 5G campaign.

https://zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/tj99AwcN3zlH/PFxtLWHe6jpN.mp4

Love peace and joy to all!

onawah

30th January 2021, 05:02

Aside from the usual warnings, this discussion mentions what concerns me greatly, which is that cell phones, not to mention 5G, compromises our immune systems. and that is part of the COVID coverup.
Such an easy way for the elites to cull the population, when most people are so addicted to their cell phones, wifi, etc. that they don't want to hear a word about the dangers.
And the way the attention span is being affected by constantly being on cell phones, besides being bombarded by so much radiation, is also part of the problem.

Max Igan talks to Rinat Strahlhofer about the Stop 5G campaign.

https://zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/tj99AwcN3zlH/PFxtLWHe6jpN.mp4

Love peace and joy to all!

Ernie Nemeth

30th January 2021, 05:15

Onawah.
If they can produce an experimental gene altering injection never before attempted, and with all previous attempts terrible failures, and with no animal studies, no long term studies, no studies on pregnant women, no study on the ill, and bring it to market in less than 1/10th the time any responsible medical professional would and should have done, and insist that all the world's people should take not one but two doses...well...I don't think they care about or will ever actually study the ill effects of their newest tech deployment.

It's just big business as usual. And while we can rot, they are too big to fail!

onawah

16th February 2021, 19:07

5G Press Conference 2/16/21 8pm EST - Hosted by Environmental Health Trust
Email update from Americans for Responsible Technology

"Join the Environmental Health Trust and the Tahoe legal team TONIGHT at 8pm EST for a press conference discussing a landmark federal cell tower litigation concerning the Lake Tahoe region.

https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/jWey4dPRCvVeQHJWUecEl8egslgYLPftXjuLaZ2-d3KKkoQjVKFAAGFuhTQHt8ng1KOdVVoWkyH5Pn8IRMHAOSIA497J_2owuhfMIV7XtUvNrPqB7hKlPbxv5mDmbFTKp7U1vulj2V0I 59wXO-zKkbrucJihUQ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b/images/3f90d5f2-2b07-421f-8abb-0811e21e76ad.png

Learn why this is a potentially precedent-setting case and how a positive outcome could impact future telecom battles around the country for years to come.

Until now, many challenges to cell towers and small cell installations on the basis of health and environmental concerns have failed. But in Tahoe, this time, the outcome may well be different.

The duration of the program will be one hour, with 15 to 20 minutes dedicated to Q&A. You won't want to miss this live event!

Pre-Register Here
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_foTRcgj0RTC8AKaYsi0jCg?fbclid=IwAR3x_kq64Wf6W4O3yf3KGgGIBo651Q6b7GZfyVGnGcilLxzu0-2GFdvVwCk

Local 5G Action Leadership Seminar Next Thursday, February 25th @ 8pm EST -Hosted by Americans for Responsible Technology

https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/vnNRMX8HFvlWg6mPGmOcAbZQqbLMnoEGe5KXPXpuay_cmWs7fFpp6ieHKaiPP2tWTQX2KU7KCvdONIQKBtoypM7zEakEs6ioqSEp Jm6P_Gb8dmsMlxTWYNEH7kunyuY9Ag3nkov53SxM1g9y8sz3VoJ5fwRhIQ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b/images/69886e96-37c2-4c6e-aa4a-a93b3d67770b.png

At 8pm EST next Thursday, February 25th, Americans for Responsible Technology will host its first local 5G action leadership seminar of 2021 with some of the country's most successful and organized safe tech advocates.

You'll hear from leaders in Indiana, Massachusetts, California, New York, Florida, and the U.S. Virgin Islands about how they've navigated the complexities of the telecoms' aggressive 5G rollout plans thus far.

Speakers will also discuss strategies you can employ to effectively raise awareness of 5G risks in your community and how to advocate for the enactment of local laws to better protect your area from future wireless infrastructure deployments.

There will be a total of 20 minutes dedicated to Q&A during this event.

Pre-Register Here
https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUlfuGhqzguGtP9p8loaNXUV2VYHGR9kUPL

View the Event Invite on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/events/1117767665304044?acontext=%7B%22event_action_history%22%3A[%7B%22extra_data%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mechanism%22%3A%22surface%22%2C%22surface%22%3A%22permalink%22%7D% 2C%7B%22extra_data%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mechanism%22%3A%22surface%22%2C%22surface%22%3A%22edit_dialog%22 %7D]%7D

We look forward to seeing you at these important upcoming events.

If you need assistance pushing back against 5G and/or other wireless infrastructure deployments in your area, please don't hesitate to reply to this email or call us at 516-883-0887."

-The 5G Crisis Team

Onawah.
If they can produce an experimental gene altering injection never before attempted, and with all previous attempts terrible failures, and with no animal studies, no long term studies, no studies on pregnant women, no study on the ill, and bring it to market in less than 1/10th the time any responsible medical professional would and should have done, and insist that all the world's people should take not one but two doses...well...I don't think they care about or will ever actually study the ill effects of their newest tech deployment.

It's just big business as usual. And while we can rot, they are too big to fail!

( Maybe not entirely hopeless, Ernie! )

onawah

19th February 2021, 19:32

Bombshell interview: the link between EMFs and the current health crisis
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com
lloyd@electricsense.com
Feb 18, 2021

(The audio is still working here: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02/
...for about another 22 hours from the time of this posting. I will ask the Mods if it can be embedded and added to the library.)

From Bill: here's the audio:

https://hosting.instantteleseminar.com/audio/130820784165889-001.mp3

"Today, Thursday 18 February at 12 Noon ET (9 AM PT or 5 PM GMT) I’m interviewing Dr. Beverly Rubik.

She is the co-author of a new research paper entitled 'Evidence for a Connection Between C*****19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves'.

Warning: this interview is more sciencey than my usual interviews but hang on tight it's worth it.

To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02 (there's also a FREE 48-hour replay).

Listen to my interview with Dr. Beverly Rubik and discover:

How research shows that carrying your cell phone for just 45 minutes in a backpack (no calling or texting) can cause blood deterioration and stickiness

How this cell phone-induced blood deterioration can increase your risk of heart attacks and strokes (it’s worse if you use your phone)

How one of the main symptoms in the current health crisis is also blood deterioration, stickiness (keep reading, the plot thickens)

How Spanish researchers have found a correlation between 5 g and C19 (note: correlation, not causation)

How the focus with C19 is on the ‘vy-rus’ and ‘the person’ – little attention is being given to environmental stressors

How Dr. Beverly’s new research paper (as yet to be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal) reveals an ALARMING link between 5 g and C19

How too much calcium inside your cells (which wireless exposures are known to create) helps the ‘vy-rus’ to enter your cells

How Dr. Beverly’s research has identified 5 different ways that wireless exposures and C19 intersect – and the lack of oxygen being observed with C19 patients may be a result of poor blood flow

How wireless exposures+chemicals (pesticides, herbicides like glyphosate) are a ‘one-two punch’ assault on our bodies, then add in the ‘vy-rus’ can lead to the ‘knock-out’

How certain frequencies given over the Internet, can counteract the stress response (-ve effects) of wireless

The EMF meter that Dr. Beverly recommends, which can measure EMFs from wiring but also the lower part of the 5 G spectrum

How many of us are electron deficient (as demonstrated by blood analysis) – and a simple and quick daily practice which can remedy this

A wearable device that can offer some protection by boosting the energy field of the body – above all Dr. Beverly recommends a multi-faceted approach

The safer alternative to 5 G, which is faster and is not a biological hazard
A powerful supplement that helps the body fight the stress of wireless and also the disease of C19 (backed up by trials)

To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02 (if the page doesn't open just copy/paste this link in your browser).

You can also listen to the broadcast by telephone so you don't have to spend too much time in front of your computer - details will be on the interview page.

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!"
(You can still listen to the broadcast for 22 more hours from the time of this posting here:
https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02/ )

To read Dr. Beverly Rubik’s study in full click here: https://osf.io/9p8qu/

To make a DONATION to Dr Beverly’s non-profit lab click here: https://frontiersciences.org/contact-us.html (Dr Beverly really does need funding to carry on this important work. If everyone that came to this page made a donation of just a few dollars even, this would make a tremendous difference.)

For more information on Dr. Beverly click here: https://www.brubik.com/ "

onawah

8th March 2021, 23:47

TechSafe Schools Legal Webinar TOMORROW:
Tuesday, March 9th @ 1pm EST

Join us for the first 90-minute TechSafe Schools webinar TOMORROW, Tuesday, March 9th, at 1pm EST (10am PST).

The TechSafe Schools project: https://www.techsafeschools.org/
...is an initiative created by Grassroots Environmental Education, a science-based 501(c)(3) environmental health non-profit organization based in New York.

Hear from some of the country's leading telecom lawyers about the potential legal implications associated with exposure to wireless radiation in schools.

Specific topics to be discussed during the 90-minute webinar include, but are not limited to, the following:

- The Fiduciary Responsibility and Duty of Care of School Administrators

- Recognition of electromagnetic sensitivity as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act

-Cell towers on school property

-Teachers’ rights under the California Fair Housing and Employment Act

Pre-Register Now: https://www.techsafeschools.org/webinars
View the Event Invite on Facebook: https://upload.facebook.com/events/528354825232450

Tomorrow's distinguished webinar will be led by Julian Gresser, twice Visiting Mitsubishi Professor at Harvard Law School. Panelists include Andrew Campanelli, Esq., Robert Berg, Esq., Jim Turner, Esq., Julian Gresser, Esq., Gregg Lien, Esq., and Mark Pollock, Esq.

The event will be recorded and stream live on our "Americans for Responsible Technology" Facebook page.

We look forward to seeing you tomorrow at 1pm EST (1oam PST). You won't want to miss this cutting-edge event!

-The 5G Crisis Team"

onawah

17th March 2021, 04:05

Essential Oils for EMF sensitivity
Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
From Lloyd Burrell's email update:
https://us20.campaign-archive.com/?u=20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766&id=c41d140427&e=82cffe55e1

"I wish you a day filled with great health and GOOD energy!

Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

Today I am thrilled to share a wonderful podcast with a brilliant colleague and friend, Jodi Cohen, where we’ll talk about essential oil solutions to deal with EMFs and EMF-sensitivity.

Please click here to download the PDF. https://interviews101direct.s3.amazonaws.com/jodiecohenhgf.pdf

Jodi is a best-selling author, award-winning journalist, and the Founder of Vibrant Blue Oils, a top resource for essential oils.

Her newest book (already a best-seller), Essential Oils to Boost the Brain and Heal the Body, synthesizes decades of leading scientific research to help explain how essential oils can work to support your body and brain.

Click here to access the interview. https://www.electricsense.com/vibrant-blue-oils-podcast/
And here are a few timestamps to support your journey:

[06:55] A powerful comparison of muscle testing and volume. “You either hear something quietly or it’s really loud. Really loud usually means this is going to help.”

[07:40] How blending oils supports organs getting back into functionality.

[10:38] Recognizing and using each person’s utterly unique energetic “blueprint”.

[14:40] How are essential oils made?

[22:22] Exploring Jodi’s unique method of blending oils to balance different organ systems, rather than focusing on symptom correction.

[24:42] Learn how essential oils overcome the blood-brain barrier.

[26:30] Where do you start? Important details about Jodi’s new best-selling book (includes blend recipes).

[27:28] Discover the five things that help everyone.

[29:00] Comparing the sympathetic vs. the parasympathetic state.

[33:49] Essential oil solutions to deal with EMFs and EMF-sensitivity.

[37:33] The science behind accessing your brain via your olfactory channel.

[38:50] The high-vibe of rose essential oil to interrupt anxiety and fear.

[45:02] Activating the parasympathetic state.

[47:10] Specific oils for grounding.

[53:20] Learn about Jodi’s specific blends: Circadian Rhythm Blend, Pancreas Blend, Liver and Gallbladder Blends.

[57:38] Discover which essential oils support lymphatic and glymphatic decongestion (to drain toxins from the brain).

[59:26] Essential oils and their effect on immune modulation.

P.S. Essential oils can help raise the vibration, or frequency, of your personal energy field (your biofield) so you are no longer a match for low vibrational threats like pathogens, VIRUSES, and EMFs. "

******************

MORE HERE FROM A DIFFERENT SOURCE:
From the Body Electric Summit email update:
"We'd like to take a moment to thank Dr. Eric Zielinski for his efforts to help make The Body Electric Summit 2.0 such a tremendous success.

Dr. Eric Zielinski and his family were affected by EMFs, and their health suffered greatly!

It wasn't until they started protecting themselves from 5G and EMF exposure with essential oils that they were able to recover...

In this 47-page eBook you'll discover:

Why EMFs and 5G are dangerous & hidden sources of exposure
The top 7 essential oils for EMF protection
The no-microwave survival guide & other Natural Living strategies to reduce risk

Click here to download your Essential Oils for 5G & EMF Protection eBook today:"
https://naturallivingfamily.com/offer-emfs-essential-oils/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Essential+oils+for+EMF+protection&utm_campaign=ENR21&cookieUUID=2c2fe4d7-5041-455b-9c55-7ae70f65089a

Hughe

18th March 2021, 00:32

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Beginning-the-Healing.pdf

CANCER LAWSUIT FILED IN 2001 WILL FINALLY GO TO TRIAL

In 2001 and 2002, Michael Patrick Murray and five other people, all of whom had brain tumors located beneath where they had held their cell phones, sued the telecommunications industry for damages. In 2010 and 2011, seven more brain cancer victims joined the case as additional plaintiffs.

The defendants represent most of the American telecommunications industry: Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile, Bell South, Bell Atlantic, Motorola, Qualcomm, Samsung, SONY, Sanyo, Nokia, the CTIA, the FCC, and dozens of other telecom companies.

Through extensive maneuvering and delaying tactics by the defendants, this important case has bounced back and forth from court to court for twenty years like a ping pong ball. It went from D.C. Superior Court, to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, to U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, back to D.C. Superior Court, up to the D.C. Court of Appeals, back to D.C. Superior Court, back up to the D.C. Court of Appeals, and back to D.C. Superior Court.

This summer, despite the fact that many of the plaintiffs are no longer alive, Murray v. Motorola will finally go to trial. Expert witness are scheduled to testify before Judge Alfred S. Irving from July 12-23, 2021. If the judge rules that the witnesses are qualified, then they will later testify before a jury.

The witnesses for the plaintiffs include:

Dr. Igor Belyaev, Head Research Scientist at the Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Science
Dr. Michael Kundi, professor at the Medical University of Vienna and former head of its Institute of Environmental Health
Dr. Abraham Liboff, professor emeritus of physics at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan
Dr. Wilhelm Mosgoeller, associate professor at the Medical University of Vienna's Institute of Cancer Research
Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos, founder of the Radiation Biophysics Laboratory at the University of Athens
Dr. Laura Plunkett, toxicologist and principal consultant at Integrative Biostrategies in Houston, Texas
Dr. Christopher Portier, Senior Advisor to the World Health Organization's Environmental Program and former Director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control

Dr. Portier's report was submitted to the court on March 1, 2021.

BEGINNING THE HEALING

The Murray case, which has been simmering on the back burner, is confronting us with a question that all the judges, and the courts, and the telecommunications companies, and the public, have managed to avoid for two decades. But the testimony we will hear in July from the world's most prominent experts will focus directly on it: what are the cell phones in our hands doing to our bodies and to the world around us?

Has our attention on cell towers diverted attention away from where it needs to be?

There are about 14 billion mobile devices in the world, each emitting up to 2 watts of microwave radiation, for a combined emitting power of about 28 billion watts.

Outside of China, there are about 3 million 4G cell towers in the world, each emitting up to a few hundred watts of microwave radiation, for a combined emitting power of perhaps 1 billion watts. Within China, there are 6 million more 4G towers, for an additional 1 to 2 billion watts.

Where is most of the radiation coming from, cell phones or cell towers? Which are more responsible for killing birds and bees, cell phones or cell towers? When you measure the radiation levels where you live, what are you mostly measuring, the many phones around you or the fewer towers? It depends on where you live.

The biggest difference between phones and towers is that phones radiate equally in all directions, whereas towers focus most of their radiation along the ground. This can multiply the effective power of a cell tower on the ground by a factor of 30 or more. But even that is not enough to raise the average radiation levels on most of the earth from all the cell towers beyond the average radiation levels from all the cell phones. And high in the air, above the main beams of cell towers, birds and insects can receive more radiation from phones than from towers.

Cell phones, as we will hear in July, damage DNA, alter the structure of proteins, affect cell growth, damage sperm, cause spontaneous abortions, interfere with memory and learning, damage the blood-brain barrier, alter brain waves, disturb sleep, affect the immune system, alter metabolism, interfere with development, damage tissues and organs, and cause cancer. What, then, are all the cell phones doing to our world?

But the antennas on towers are so much bigger than phones, you may say. Size has nothing to do with it. The extra size mostly allows the tower to focus its beam along the ground instead of up in the air.

But towers are always on, you may say, and phones aren't. Untrue. If all the phones were ever off, a tower would only emit enough power to let the phones know that it is there. And even when you think your phone is turned completely off, the resonant circuits within it are still connected to the battery and are still affecting the space around them.

But your phone only emits one frequency, you may say, while the tower emits hundreds. Yes, but the tower only emits hundreds of frequencies when hundreds of phones are communicating with it. The combined radiation and combined number of frequencies are still about the same from all the phones as from all the towers.

What is making people more sick, and doing more damage to the earth? The phones? Or the towers?

We have all had the experience that the higher in elevation we are, the more radiation we feel. This is partially because there are cell towers on the tops of hills and mountains. But it is also due to radio towers and radar stations, which do not focus their energy along the ground. Weather radars. Air traffic control radars. Civil defense radars. They are all proliferating and increasing in power and sophistication, and they are all helping to destroy the Earth. Cell towers are contributing too, but it is a mistake to blame the cell towers while you are holding a cell phone in your hand, or are keeping one in your home.

Just 25 years ago, the average human being did no harm to other species, or other humans, when taking a walk. Today, every human being is a source of radiation wherever he or she goes.

I have confined this discussion to 4G, because 5G is changing the picture. But it is not changing the picture as much as you may think. With 5G, both towers and phones will aim narrow beams at each other. This will further increase the effective power of both towers and phones more than tenfold, if you happen to be standing in the beam. But what this also means is that a person using a cell phone will be even more hazardous than before to any person or animal in their immediate vicinity, and to any bird or insect that flies between the phone and the tower. And since there are billions of phones on earth, woe be to any creature that still wants to fly through the air at all. Not because the towers will be emitting radiation at all times, but because there are so many cell phones to aim their beams at.

The late Pelda Levey, a co-founder of the Cellular Phone Task Force, told this joke about cell phones: "I have both good news and bad news about cell phones. The bad news is that a cell phone can give you a brain tumor. The good news is that if you feel one coming on, you can always call 911."

Calling 911 will not save the Earth. Throwing away your cell phone just might. It might begin the healing.

onawah

20th March 2021, 01:01

CHD Files Emergency Injunction to Stop Rule Allowing 5G Antennas on Homes
3/19/21
By CHD 5G and Wireless Harms Project Team
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/emergency-injunction-fcc-5g-antennas/?utm_source=salsa&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=otard#register-form&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=d7587973-a843-49b6-aaa7-5938b2486bbd

"Children’s Health Defense will hold a press conference March 22 to discuss why it seeks emergency relief to stay a rule that would preempt federal and state civil rights laws designed to protect the disabled.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Thursday filed a motion for emergency relief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit asking the court to stay the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Over-the-Air Reception Devices” (OTARD) Rule Amendment before it goes into effect March 29.

The motion is part of CHD’s petition, filed on Feb. 26, challenging the rule amendment. CHD will hold a press conference March 22, at 4 p.m. EDT (register below).

CHD is opposing an amended rule allowing private property owners to place fixed point-to-point antennas supporting wireless service on their property and, for the first time, to extend wireless data/voice services, including 5G, to users on neighboring properties. The rule purports to facilitate fast deployment of mesh Wi-Fi networks, 5G and the ground infrastructure for SpaceX satellites, especially in rural areas.

The amended rule allows installation of radiation-transmitting antennas on homes while preempting all state and local zoning authority. No permit is required, homeowners’ association and deed restrictions and any other state laws are preempted.

The focus of CHD’s motion for emergency relief is the FCC’s preemption of federal and state civil rights laws that protect the disabled and their rights for accommodations. People who are adversely affected will have no right to object to the installation of these devices, even though they will be involuntarily exposed to harmful radiation in their homes.

A motion for stay requires that the movants demonstrate: (a) likelihood of success on the merits in the case; (b) they are likely to suffer irreparable harm; (c) the balance of interests favors an injunction; and (d) a stay is in the public interest.

In its motion, CHD claims that if the amended rule goes into effect, petitioners and many others who developed radiation sickness (electrosensitivity) or other sicknesses caused or aggravated by wireless technology radiation, will suffer immediate, irreparable and, for some, life-threatening injuries. Many will be driven out of their homes, but nowhere will be safe for them, not even rural areas.

CHD argues petitioners are likely to win the case because the amended rule violates substantive and procedural due process rights, and is unlawful and contrary to the public interest. Therefore, and because of the irreparable harm to many, the court should grant the stay pending a final decision in the case.

Petitioners include a family physician and mothers of four children who are sick from wireless radiation.
.
CHD’s April letter to the FCC was joined by 6,231 people who declared that they and/or their children are sick from wireless radiation. Eleven affidavits were filed in support of the motion, providing evidence of widespread sickness and even death in adults and children.

Three of the affidavits were filed by experts, including Beatrice Golomb, M.D., Ph.D., whose 2018 paper showed that the “mystery sickness” suffered by U.S. diplomats was likely caused by pulsed radio-frequencies The petitioners in the March 18 filing experience the same sickness and symptoms brought on by exposure to wireless technology.

Following the request of the U.S. Department of State to advise officials on the “mystery” sickness of the U.S. diplomats, in December 2020, the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) published a report, “An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies,” confirming Golomb’s findings regarding the diplomats.

Riina Bray, medical director, Environmental Health Clinic, Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Canada — the first hospital clinic in the world to specialize in radiation sickness, wrote to the court that seven doctors in the clinic had already diagnosed more than 400 patients with the condition, and they have a long waiting list. In addition to having a medical degree, Bray has a degree in chemical engineering and a master’s in pharmacology/toxicology in the area of drug addiction and neurotoxicology.

In her affidavit, Dr. Toril Jelter, a California pediatrician treating 100 patients, including children, who suffer from radiation sickness, wrote about the improvement she is seeing in children with neurodevelopmental conditions after the families remove wireless devices from their house.

The effects of wireless radiation on children, especially those with preexisting conditions, was confirmed recently by the Swiss government’s expert committee on electromagnetic fields and non-ionizing radiation, BERENIS. In January 2021, the committee published an extensive evaluation of the scientific literature and concluded that exposure could cause or worsen several chronic illnesses, and that children and people with immune deficiencies or diseases are especially at risk.

“Injunctions are very difficult to obtain,” said Dafna Tachover, director of CHD’s Wireless Harms and 5G Project. “However, the grave and immediate harm and injustice that will be caused to many if this rule goes into effect is intolerable. For those who are sick, this motion is literally a battle for their right to exist. We had to file this motion no matter what the chances are.”

CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said: “By eliminating due process and civil rights protections, the FCC has shown that it will silence any evidence of wireless harms that threatens its wireless agenda. FCC is sacrificing the health of adults and children on the altar of Telecom profit taking. Removing people’s disability accommodations even in their own homes is morally and legally indefensible.”

CHD’s lead attorney for this case is Scott McCollough, a telecommunications and administrative law attorney with 35 years’ experience. Mr. McCollough also represented CHD in its previous and ongoing case against the FCC. The first case, filed in February 2020, challenges the FCC’s obsolete health and safety guidelines regarding 5G and wireless radiation. Oral arguments in the case were heard in January 2021. The case is now awaiting the court’s decision.

Prior to filing of the March 18 motion, CHD filed an administrative motion with the FCC to stay the rule amendment from going into effect until a decision in the case. The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association, which lobbied for the rule amendment, opposed the motion. However, the FCC hasn’t ruled on the motion, and therefore, CHD filed a motion for an emergency injunction with the court.

Immediately after the filing of the motion to stay the rule amendment, the court appointed a three-judge panel to decide on the motion, comprised of Judith W. Rogers, Judge Rober L. Wilkins and Judge Neomi Rao. The court ordered the FCC to file its response on March 23. CHD will be able to file a reply to the FCC’s response on March 24. A decision is expected before March 29, when the rule is supposed to go into effect."

ExomatrixTV

24th March 2021, 21:16

US Policy Actions on 5G, Health and Environmental Effects:

Jz6z1AOxSyA

ExomatrixTV

29th March 2021, 16:28

#Stop5G .. Microwaves spectrum starts at 300 Mhz and (Beamforming) Microwaves go up to 30 Ghz AND above 30 Ghz up to 300 Ghz are called mmWaves (millimeter waves) but even mmWaves are part of the Microwaves spectrum. . Mhz (Mega = Million Hz) ... GHz is Giga Hertz = Billion Hz ...

What almost all Mainstream Media totally ignores is the Erratic PULSED Nature of Microwaves that cause so many cumulative health problems ... which manifest over a longer time period mixed with other toxins responding to those frequencies ... all depends how much TOXINS you have in your body reacting to Erratic Pulsed Microwaves! . * Hz = Hertz = Pulse Per Second!

🌐 CUMULATIVE HARMFUL explained here:

If you give a 5 year young child a droplet of alcohol ... it will not die nor get ill at the spot (unless it is allergic to it) ... but if you give it 1 droplet alcohol every 5 minutes 24 hours a day 7 days a week it will be cumulative harmful just like #5G can be and the severity all depends how much toxins you have in your body. . Being saturated by more and more increasing ERRATIC PULSED microwave-transmitters of all kinds everywhere they DELIBERATELY do not account of the mixture effects of all of them ... as it will be hard to predict the consequences of being surrounded by so many (new) transmitters.

⚠️ When people have certain (new) CHRONIC "mystery" health problems and they can not find the cause of it ... tried to rule out all possibilities ... often they never considered to stop using WiFi and make your home completely go wired ... (USB3 Ethernet Adapters are not expensive!) ... Some lucky ones noticed their health problems rapidly diminished after long vacation in a Microwave Free zones BUT these areas become more rare by the day ... as the PUSH for having 5G everywhere even from space radiating all of us 24/7.

Science2Stop5G PDF (https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=466059141505023&set=gm.1154347918333695) (1 of 1000s)

John Kuhles March 29th, 2021 🦜🦋🌳
Founder Stop5G Fb Group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/) (35,000+ members)

Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & twitter.com/Stop5G (https://twitter.com/Stop5G)

onawah

11th April 2021, 22:52

Jay Dyer Breakdown of SPARS 2025-2028 Depopulation Document
Published April 10, 2021 2,426 Views
https://rumble.com/vfjq19-jay-dyer-breakdown-of-spars-2025-2028-depopulation-document.html
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/jay-dyer-breakdown-of-spars-2025-2028-depopulation-document/

"Jay Dyer does an excellent analysis of the SPARS document and the post-human agenda that is driving it, as well the global scamdemic to which humanity is now being subjected.

"It'll be robotic...from the macro to the micro scale. The idea is that eventually, this can replace the existing failed biological world.

"So the real enemy here, if you're wondering why they're always talking about carbon and why is carbon bad and 'carbon credits'? Carbon is the basis of life. And the enemy in this Malthusian scheme is carbon-based life forms that need to give way to synthetic-based life forms...

"The modus operandi in this worldview is evolution in the strict, Luciferian sense. I'm not talking about adaptation – we all believe that species evolve to adapt to their environment. But I'm talking about the idea that you can evolve into some other totally different being...

"In order to get to that, that requires the cyborg mutation phases, to move out of being 'human' into modified humans, to cyborgs, androids, then into the post-human. So, silicon-based life forms, nanotech-based mutations...

"It sounds like a science fiction story. It IS a science fiction story but they believe it, OK? And that's what Klaus [Schwab] says in the second half of this book ['Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution'], is that we're going to have logical reclassifications of what life forms are, so that we can have nanotech, synthetic organisms now classed as life forms.

"This will allow us to prepare the way, legally for the new system that comes into play. The new system is a re-write of all of nature and the world and biological systems to be more 'logical', more 'rational' mecha systems. That's the plan.

"The plan is not just to have a global government of baby-eating adrenochrome-guzzling Satanists, OK? That does go on in some places but that's not the real longterm goal, here. The real longterm goal is to be post-human, to end man as man is known...

"And Klaus is abundantly clear, every chapter in the second half of this book is about the 3D printing the robots, themselves will control to self-replicate. They will then run giant drone fleets, 'the AI', he's saying, they'll have the killer drones that will, then through targeted tracking and tracing get rid of anyone that's a problem.

"And he says by 2030, 2040, 2050, there won't be humans. You won't be born in your mom's womb. There'll be CRISPR technology that will engineer synthetic humanoids - synthoids...This what Klaus projects - the head of the World Economic Forum; the head of Davos...

"He says the key to all of this is to control energy, via the SmartDust, via the SmartTech, via the tracking, via a robot drone fleet that will police everything after everything has been sprayed with SmartDust. That's what he says. You can call that crazy if you want to. That's one of the most influential, wealthiest men out there; part of this global Liberal, Left elite of the World Economic Forum." "
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113713-Transhumanism-in-action-spiritual-warfare&p=1421484&viewfull=1#post1421484

onawah

12th April 2021, 21:26

:bump: Great talk!
Max Igan talks to Rinat Strahlhofer about the Stop 5G campaign.

https://zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/tj99AwcN3zlH/PFxtLWHe6jpN.mp4

Love peace and joy to all!

James Newell

12th April 2021, 21:35

Health Ranger posted a very interesting video on what 4g does to xylitol. Two cell phones completely morph the crystal. We of course have crystals in our body and the powers that be must know data like this.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-04-12-shocking-video-reveals-mobile-phone-interfering-with-xylitol-crystal-formation-morphic-resonance.html

ExomatrixTV

13th April 2021, 18:02

#Stop5G Related Issues: "Xylitol Crystal Morphology (https://www.bitchute.com/video/P5QEnCVakY0e/) vs. 4G Mobile Phone Erratic Pulsed Microwaves"

P5QEnCVakY0e

Icare

13th April 2021, 22:30

Too late for Germany :(

It's now operational in Germany with 170 cities and municipalites now having it.
Two of the places are just around the corner from where I live. I'm gutted. :(

https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/04/germany-170-cities-and-municipalities-now-have-5g/

ExomatrixTV

18th April 2021, 20:55

Over 700 Medical and Scientific Experts Slam FCC For Ignoring Environmental & Health Risks of 5G

In a letter (https://ed84ae68-328e-42f4-847a-66fb863ac9df.filesusr.com/ugd/2cea04_846b6754a3904ad6b5d325bab4a32f06.pdf) submitted to the Federal Communications (FCC) on August 5th, more than 700 medical professionals and scientific experts from across the country have called for the agency to stop its incipient approval of commercial use of high spectrum bands for 5G communication until independent scientists have been consulted about the wide array of potential effects such action may have on humans, wildlife and the environment.

"Humans interfere with nature at our peril, and the agency's apparent disregard for the potential impacts of dramatically expanding the use of these high-frequency bands on our natural world is deeply disturbing," the letter states. "We urge the Commission, in the strongest possible terms, to proactively seek the guidance of scientific experts who can enlighten agency officials regarding the possible and probable consequences of its proposed actions."

The experts cite independent scientific studies showing that high frequency radiofrequency transmissions can interfere with the navigational ability of insects, birds and other animals that use earth's magnetic fields for orientation, as well as other studies showing that certain frequencies can also cause biological and physiological harm to honey bees. Some studies have linked increasing exposure to radiofrequency radiation with Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD).

"Every day, scientists are learning more about how wireless radiation can adversely impact our natural world," says Zoe Berg, Project Manager for non-profit Americans for Responsible Technology (https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/), which helped coordinate signatories for the letter. "So it's disheartening, and more than a little frightening, that the FCC is either unaware of such research or just unconcerned about it. American taxpayers deserve an FCC that prioritizes public health and the protection of the environment over the desires of private companies.”

The professional signatories were joined by more than 1,700 additional citizens calling for the FCC to delay action on Docket No. 20-133. A copy of the letter can be found here (https://ed84ae68-328e-42f4-847a-66fb863ac9df.filesusr.com/ugd/2cea04_846b6754a3904ad6b5d325bab4a32f06.pdf).

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2cea04_8ebd5b550fe84bce9d790235baaeb4ef~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_389,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/2cea04_8ebd5b550fe84bce9d790235baaeb4ef~mv2.webp

source (https://www.5gcrisis.com/post/over-700-medical-and-scientific-experts-slam-fcc-for-ignoring-environmental-health-risks-of-5g)
pdf (https://ed84ae68-328e-42f4-847a-66fb863ac9df.filesusr.com/ugd/2cea04_846b6754a3904ad6b5d325bab4a32f06.pdf)
This is not "Fear Porn" as 1 unnamed admin claims in tags of this forum thread!

ExomatrixTV

18th April 2021, 21:19

2010 Lloyd's of London Report Compares EMFs (Wireless Radiation) to Asbestos

In 2010, Lloyd's of London, one of the largest insurance markets in the world, published a report titled, "Electro-magnetic fields from mobile phones: recent developments." This report compares electromagnetic fields (EMFs) to the asbestos disaster on Page 15 of 26:

"The issue of asbestos and its implications is widely known throughout the insurance industry, and many comparisons can be drawn with EMF – the initial impression that it was a ‘wonder product’ coupled with potential very long-term serious health issues not understood at the start of its use. Like asbestos any EMF litigation will probably be long and complex – similar issues could occur such as the definition of an actionable injury, policy triggers and apportioning liability."

While this report is 11 years old, and primarily discusses the adverse health effects associated with EMF exposure in the context of brain cancer, which of course is not the only major health issue (https://www.5gcrisis.com/scientific-studies) correlated with exposure, the comparison between EMFs and asbestos is both striking and highly disturbing. Interestingly, in 2015, Lloyd's of London created a pollution exclusion (https://www.scribd.com/document/261610831/Insurance-AE-CFC-Underwriting-Limited-Lloyds-Latest-Version-February-7th-2015) from their policies related to risks that may arise due to exposure to EMFs.

Read the full publication here (https://assets.lloyds.com/assets/pdf-emf-final-november-2010/1/pdf-emf-final-november-2010.pdf).

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2cea04_903f9c212d2c407c95682df9bf484bf4~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_389,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/2cea04_903f9c212d2c407c95682df9bf484bf4~mv2.webp

source (https://www.5gcrisis.com/post/2010-lloyd-s-of-london-report-compares-emfs-wireless-radiation-to-asbestos)

onawah

24th April 2021, 22:01

It will probably be a while before any standard scientific studies can be done, but there are credible sources reporting on the transmission of something from those who have had the COVID injections--too many to be coincidental.
It will probably be a while before any standard scientific studies can be done, but there are credible sources reporting on the transmission of something from those who had the COVID injections--too many to be coincidental.
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/4Bb4KAJ4kppw/
Testimonies from several experts including Dr. Christian Northrup.
Dr. Carrie Madej introduces the possibility that toxic frequencies are part of the transmission problem, if there is some kind of nanotech in the shots.

Also posted here:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113781-Could-a-vaccinated-person-pass-on-a-jab-ingredient-to-an-unvaccinated-person&p=1424136&viewfull=1#post1424136

TomKat

28th April 2021, 20:24

A story of a 5G tower. Local government powerless. People sick.

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/04/5g-earth-day-countdown-children-amelias-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-cell-tower-days.html

Probably a global dictate, like chemtrails.

ExomatrixTV

4th May 2021, 20:50

CEO Frank Clegg challenges a President of Rogers Communications on 5G Safety Claims!

Tgy7oBg8MHiK
source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/Tgy7oBg8MHiK/)

ExomatrixTV

8th May 2021, 12:44

5G Summit - Ronald Melnick - Clear Evidence of Cancer: The 30 Million NTP Survey:

non2phOTNNzx

Interviewer: Josh del Sol; translated by Vera Groen. This translation is a pre-release of a selection of the transcripts from the 5G Summits 2019/20:
PDF (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&ajax=1&u=https://www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5G20_Digital_Book.pdf)

Which will be published in book form in the Netherlands. The translator is one of the volunteers participating in this project.

Dr. Ronald Melnick spent 28 years as a lead toxicologist and independent consultant at
the National Toxicology Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS),
which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). He led the design and interpretation of
toxicological and mechanistic studies on chemicals in the environment and working environments. He has served
on numerous scientific review committees and advisory panels, including the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). In 2011, the IARC classified radio frequency radiation as
possibly carcinogenic. Dr. Melnick led the NTP investigation into cell phone radiation.
He retired before the end of the study, but he still took part in the
2018 peer review. Melnick also spent a year at
the White House 's Office of Science and Technology Policy .

Josh: Participant at the Summit today is Dr. Ronald Melnick. Ron, thank you very much for being with us.
Dr. Melnick: I am happy to be there. Thank you.
Josh: Can I have you Ron or Ronald or Dr. Call Melnick?
Dr. Melnick: My friends call me Ron.
Josh:Okay. Thank you. You were in charge of the National Toxicology Program's research into
radiofrequency radiation, which cost $ 30 million and was initiated about 20 years ago.
So your story really comes first hand. We get important information from someone who has
actually done the real scientific work. We hear his opinion about the
study, the results, the safety standards, and about 5G. So an important interview.
Dr. Melnick: Yes, just a point to clarify. I led the design. I retired
before the investigations were completed. I did participate in the peer review of the study.
Josh: That was in 2018.
Dr. Melnick: In 2018, yes.

The National Toxicology Program

Josh: Ron, you have an extensive background and it's nice to talk to you about it. I would
like to go deep into things. I really want to understand them and try to get a clear picture of
the NTP research that was funded by the government. How big was it in size and what was
your role in it?
Dr. Melnick: I wonder if I shouldn't even go back a step further, for people who may
not know what the National Toxicology Program is.
Josh: Please.
Dr. Melnick:The National Toxicology Program dates back to 1978. The then Secretary of
Health and Wellness thought it better to merge the different bodies in HEW (which is now DHHS
) into one program - instead of doing their own toxicity studies.
So the National Toxicology Program is actually a combination of multiple agencies. It
currently includes the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and
the National Institutes of Health, headquartered at the NIEHS. It grew out of a
cancer research program conducted at the National Cancer Institute, that
eventually moved to Research Triangle Park in North Carolina. I
spent over 28 years there at the NIEHS National Toxicology Program.
Josh: Okay, great. Thank you.
Dr. Melnick: The National Toxicology Program accepts nominations for studies from multiple
sources - all sources, in fact. They can come in through agencies. The main source of
nominations is usually the National Cancer Institute. But they can come from the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, or the EPA, maybe even the FDA, but also citizens or
unions or whatever group. The nominations are assessed and eventually the
selected candidates in a general sense within the National Toxicology Program.
Cell phone radiation entered the National Toxicology Program from the FDA.
Josh: Who commissioned this big investigation?
Dr. Melnick: They asked.
Josh: Okay.

Tissue warming

Dr. Melnick: They were asked to conduct animal experiments in order to assess whether there is a risk to
humans from the radiation from mobile phones. The exposure guidelines that
existed at the time were based on thermal damage or heating of tissue during short term
exposure. They thought it important that we tried to understand whether or not there are
long-term health effects from non-thermal exposures, if you
were to reduce the warming effect.
As most people know, it is microwave radiation. When you are exposed to
a high level, it causes heating. That's why you put your food in the microwave. But at lower
levels you can minimize the warming effect. That's like the radiation from cell phones.
But are there possible health effects even without the tissue heating?
Josh:So you look at possible effects that occur at levels well below the threshold of what is
necessary to heat tissue - what the standards are based on.
Dr. Melnick: Yes.
Josh: Okay.
Dr. Melnick: I can tell you a little more about that standard if it interests you.
Josh: Please.

The exposure standards

Dr. Melnick: The standard was developed as a result of exposures. They were done in monkeys; they
were exposed to this type of microwave radiation. There was a dose - I'll try to explain
- and it was 4 watts per kilogram. That's a numerical value to keep in mind for a while;
but so the body temperature did not rise by one degree Celsius. That then became the target
for cell phone exposures.
That value of 4 watts per kilo was divided by 50 to determine that this would be a safe dose
for human whole body exposure. And 4 divided by 50 is 0.08 watts per kilo.
But there is another standard involved besides that for whole body exposure. The
other aspect is local tissue exposure. For one gram of tissue they set the
exposure value at 1.6 watts per kilo.
These values are called SAR: Specific Absorption Ratio (or SAT: Absorption Rate). If you search in the
menu of your mobile phone, you have to look under Settings general - Legal
information - Radiation. This will help you find out what the permitted exposure or emission of your mobile
phone is - what it has been tested for. The standard is therefore 1.6 watts per kilo.
These figures are important because they underlie the design of the study.
Josh: Why is the whole body exposure figure a much more stringent
threshold, while the other figure for exposure to a specific point is much higher?
Dr. Melnick:I'm not exactly sure why. The whole body, as I said - that was based on a
rise in temperature, a rise in whole body temperature. For example, you have exposure
when you walk past or are close to a cell tower; the whole body is then exposed. But
if the whole body is exposed, then there may be a higher level at the tissue level, as long as
the whole body stays within the limit.
I want to explain something about that, namely the importance of the difference between the values 1.6 and 0.08. The
NTP studies were designed for 1.6 watts per kilo. That has to do with the location of the
antenna, because it emits the radiation from the mobile phone. Suppose I hold a cell phone
to my head. The tissue that is heated is the tissue that is right next to the antenna
. So my concern is that 1.6 watts per kilo applies to that fabric.
Dividing that value by my entire body weight, including my ankles, my calves, the rest of my body, would
virtually eliminate the exposure of the local tissue.
So you have a local SAR of 1.6 watts per kilogram, and a whole body SAR of 0.08 watts.
When designing the NTP study, I was mainly concerned with the 1.6 watts per kilo, because that is the
permitted exposure.

Distance is decisive

Josh: So we are at 1.6 watts per kilo, that is the SAR standard, the specific absorption ratio. That is the
permissible microwave radiation threshold from a cell phone for the tissue next to it. And
only warming is assumed. Okay, please move on.
Dr. Melnick: The experiments at the NTP were done with animals. You cannot measure SAR in
living animals or humans. A model must be devised for it. The value that you find in your mobile
phone is obtained by holding the antenna next to a simulation liquid, a liquid
with properties comparable to fabric. And that provides a model for the analysis.
It comes down to how close the antenna is to the tissue. If the antenna is further away, the
impact decreases with a square of the distance. So if I double the distance between the antenna and my
head, the impact is a quarter instead of half.
Why animal testing?
Dr. Melnick: So the NTP conducts research on animals. And why do we conduct research on animals
instead of humans? Well, first of all ...
Josh: Ethics.
Dr. Melnick: That's one reason. Another reason is that many disease processes occur in animals
take place in the same way as in humans. Every human carcinogen known to us
has also been shown to be carcinogenic in animal studies that have been properly conducted.
Another reason is the issue of disruptions when conducting human research. They are
exposed to one influence, but there are also other environmental influences that occur. And
was it the specific influence you were focusing on, or was it a result of other disruptive
factors? However, with animals, we can very carefully design a study to
really measure the exposure in those animals appropriately.
Finally, if there is a anticipated effect, regulators can use the data to
reduce exposures in order to limit the risks. Cancers can have a long
reaction time. It can take thirty years before we really know whether something is safe or not. This in
contrast to animal experiments, where it can be done in much less years.
Josh: So it was a twenty-year study. And it happened with radiation from 2G and 3G, right?
Can you confirm that?
Dr. Melnick: The investigation took about 20 years. But it actually involved researching
chronic animal exposure. It was a study in stages. The animals in the cancer study
were actually exposed for over two years.
Josh: So collecting data for two years, is that right?
Dr. Melnick: Two years of exposure. I can go through the different steps in the process a bit
.
Josh: A quick overview, yes. That would be helpful.

Assessing the risk

Dr. Melnick: So the actual cancer exposure was two years. I was the project leader
for the design of the experiment. Because how do you do that, animal experiments with cellular radiation
Phones? Of course you sometimes see a cartoon with mobile phones and animals. But in
reality, we had to find a way to expose animals to the radiation
without disrupting their normal life.
A few studies had been done on this type of radiation. At the time, we found them insufficient
to understand whether or not there is an effect. When the research was conducted - and this is important
- it was assumed that the only effect of this type of radiation is heating. Because it is non-ionizing radiation, that is to say, it does not break chemical bonds.
So we wanted to test that hypothesis: is there an effect that has nothing to do with global warming? And
if there is such an effect, can we gather enough information for what we call a dose response analysis? Can we more or less quantify the risks? because animal testing can be
regarded as relatively insensitive in this respect.
We usually work with 50 copies. But in this study we had 90 animals per group. In
such a study, you will not reach statistical significance until you see an increase of at least 5 percent
over the control level.
Now 5 percent in a human population would be epidemic. So animal testing is usually
done with much higher levels of exposure than what humans experience. By means of a
dose-response analysis we try to estimate the risk at lower levels. So it is
clear that a risk of 10 percent is unacceptable. But what is acceptable? Is one in
1000 a risk?
We think 250-300 million people in the US have a cell phone, so one in 1000
is a lot of people. How about one in 100,000? Or one in a million? Those are tough
questions when it comes to what the tolerable risk is. It's something the Supreme Court
dealt with in the 1980s. What is an acceptable risk? Do you want to hear their conclusion?
Josh: Sure. What did they say?
Dr. Melnick:They took a little guess. If the risk was less than one in a billion, it was
insignificant. If it was greater than one in 1,000, it was extremely significant. So they left a
big gap between one in 1,000 and one in a billion. EPA took one in a million. OSHA, the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, took one in 1,000 - which is quite different.
In any case, we want to know what the risk is. Because if you understand the risk, you can try to mitigate it
by adjusting the device or taking other precautions.

Reverberation room with paddles

Josh: Before we go into the findings, I would like to confirm this: it was about
2G and 3G technology, is that right? And were they mice or rats; or which animals were used?
Dr. Melnick: We use mice and rats. The main effects were seen in rats.
Josh: Okay.
Dr. Melnick: Basically it concerns 2G. Much of 3G is still like 2G, just faster.
So all this in terms of setting up the study, and that's why it took a long time. I
contacted engineers and physicists at the National Institute of Standards and
Technology because another group there had helped us with radiation from electricity, the very low-
frequency radiation.
I spoke to someone there, his name was Perry Wilson, and we talked about the concept of reverberation chambers. We
investigated the feasibility of conducting tests in a reverberation room. That is a space that resembles a large
microwave. In that room you have an antenna and it emits the radiation. You also have
rudder paddles, which actually bounce the radiation in all directions. This way you have a
homogeneous environment with this radio frequency radiation within a short time .
We wanted to see if we could do our animal experiments in a reverberation room. So we had to
show that you could create a homogeneous environment, so that animals living in one part of the
room, receive the same radiation level as animals in another area. It took a
while to develop that.
We reached out to a group in Zurich, Switzerland. And we were concerned with
modeling the nature of the absorption dose in animals and their specific tissues when exposed in
a reverberation chamber. So they developed the particular model for quantifying at the frequencies that
we were using, at the level of the doses to be absorbed. We used two frequencies: 900
megahertz and 1800 megahertz. Because those are the central frequencies that are used for mobile
telephone communication.
Josh:Does that apply to 2G and 3G respectively?
Dr. Melnick: Yes. I believe they are still in use. Yes, 3G and ... I'm not sure. But I also
think 4G. 5G will be very different. 5G has a much higher frequency.

Room to move and water

Josh: Let's look at the findings. What have you discovered?
Dr. Melnick: I wasn't done yet ...
Josh: Okay, I'm a little impatient. But I will let it go. Because you are laying a very
important basis here before we go into the findings. Please go on.
Dr. Melnick: That's what I'm trying to do ...
So back, we wanted to look at effects other than global warming. So we did what we called a
thermal pilot study, in which we exposed animals to different levels of radiation.
We had temperature measurements taken; because we didn't want to increase body temperature by more than one
degree Celsius. Because that is the basis for the guidelines for cell phones.
There were four rats where we could go up to 6 watts per kilogram instead of 4 watts per kilogram.
That ended up being the highest exposure we used in our rats.
As I said before, you usually sit much higher on a toxicity test. You then do a
quantitative risk analysis and then extrapolates to lower values. But we couldn't
go higher than 6, because at 6 you'd get the warming effect.
The first thing we had to do now was set the highest level. We used the usual
modulation. You have GSM, the Global System for Mobile Communication, which is commonly used in
Europe. I also believe in two networks in the US. I thought AT&T; not sure if it is also with TMobile. The other is CDMA, Code Division Multiple Access. These are modulations with which you give many
people access to the network. So we included both GSM and CDMA in our studies
.
To give a study more weight, we increase the number of animals. A normal NTP study has 50 animals per group. When we switched to the chronic part,
we increased to 90, with the highest exposure now being 6 watts per kilogram. We also used 3 watts per
kilogram and 1.5 watts per kilogram. So essentially halving the dose so that if there was an effect it
would be possible to do a dose response analysis for a quantitative risk assessment.
To get a higher sensitivity in the rats, we took rats from pregnancy to
delivery and then for another two years.
A typical NTP study takes two years: from about six weeks old. But let me first
explain something about the reverberation room, I think this is also important.
In a reverberation room the animals walk around freely in their cage. This is important, because in previous
studies the animals were confined in tubes during exposure. In previous
experiments, the animals also had no access to water; therefore exposure
periods were limited to two hours per day.
We wanted to increase the exposure time because we could not increase the exposure dose. We came
up with a way for the animals to get to water during exposure. You ca
n't just put a bottle in it, because that bottle of water would absorb energy and get warmer. You can use the
do not shield the bottle and just work with a large hose. That water would also heat up and you could have
scattering effects between the animals when they are drinking. So we had an
automatic water system in the design with a valve, so the animals could drink without
their heads being exposed to the radiation.

Schwannomas and Gliomas

Dr. Melnick: The study was conducted for two years after the design was completed. There
were multiple effects in the rats. Some of the effects observed were increases
in heart schwannomas. Schwann cells are the cells that make up the myelin sheath around the nerve.
That was one type of tumor effect in the males. The other kind was a glioma. This is a
brain tumor that was also seen in the exposed animals and not in the control animals.
So we had four groups. We had a control group, exactly the same room, with a rudder paddle.
There was even an antenna too; but it had no power. The other groups were
exposed to different levels of radiation under exactly the same conditions; we maintained
1.5 watts, 3 watts, or 6 watts per kilogram for the animals throughout the study. As they increased
, the intensity of exposure could increase, but the actual dose of SAR remained
constant.
Josh:So you found schwannomen in the heart. Is that a malignant tumor?
Dr. Melnick: Yes.
Josh: And then gliomas in the brain, is that right?
Dr. Melnick: That's right. In addition, if you look at those effects before making a decision, how
strong is the evidence? They are rare tumors, which you don't see very often in the control groups, and that
gives them more priority against the rest of the background. So you see a small number of increases, but
because it is a rare tumor that you hardly encounter in such a program, this has more
relevance.
Josh: And are schwannomas and / or gliomas rare?
Dr. Melnick: Yes, they are unusual.

No Risk Assessment

Josh: You said the Supreme Court reported between one in 1,000 and one in a billion, somewhere in
that gray area, but OSHA one in 1,000. And EPA one in a million. What are the numbers for
the NTP study? How much increase in those two cancer tumors was there?
Dr. Melnick: You can only answer that question if someone does a risk analysis with the data.
And that did not happen. The purpose of this study - nominated by the FDA - was that
a quantitative risk analysis could be done. And if that could be done, the
information is provided to the FCC, which establishes the guidelines. The intention would be to
develop guidelines that protect health, rather than guidelines based on the assumption that you have
absorption and no warming effect. This quantitative risk analysis has not been carried out.
Josh: In other words, the FDA asked for the study to be carried out and it was. There
were significant findings showing increases in cancer - those cancerous tumors.
What happened then? They just let it be; or what has been the effect of these findings
? Are you satisfied with the effect they have had?
Dr. Melnick:Well, I am not satisfied. That's for sure. Because the FDA said we
can't apply this information to humans.
Josh: Why?
Dr. Melnick: They didn't give a reason. They just explained it. The director of the
Radiological Wireless Equipment Department simply put it this way: this doesn't apply to humans. But
it just doesn't make any sense because the FDA nominated it with the intention that we
would do a quantitative ... a risk assessment for humans. So the FDA is essentially shying away from
its responsibility and not living up to the intent of its own nomination.

Advice for users

Josh:You wrote an article saying, "The FDA states that" existing exposure guidelines are
based on protection against acute injury from thermal effects of exposure to
radio frequency radiation, but they may not protect against non-thermal effects of
long-term exposure. " But by taking this new position, and
ignoring the NTP results , the FDA is clearly evading its responsibility for assessing
the impact of radiofrequency radiation on human health. ”
We could go in different directions now. But the mere meaning of realizing that there is
about $ 30 million has been invested to see if cell phones are at or below the
allowable level for cancer in rats! And the answer is that there was a significant increase
in schwannomas in the heart and gliomas in the brain. And then they left it at that.
I would like to ask the following question. It's speculation, but we know what
Harvard 's Department of Ethics has written about the FCC: that it's industry controlled. But in the other
interviews at this Summit, we've also heard a lot about the FDA. What is actually going on
, and what is the significance of this, Ron? The investigation was carried out, there was cancer
demonstrated, and then they left it for what it was. What kind of picture does this fit?
Dr. Melnick: I can't tell you why they decided it that way. All I can say is
that at this point, as far as I know, they decided not to do anything about it. In fact, the information had already become
available in 2016, when the NTP released some partial findings due to the
potential impact of these findings on the general population. The tumors in the heart and the
tumors in the brain - that was already known in 2016.
They may not want people to think that their cell phone is at risk of cancer
entails. Maybe they have other reasons. I can't say whether or not the industry has an
influence, but it is certainly a possibility. But from a public health point of view
, it seems to me that you want to understand, and quantify, and do something about the risks.
Recommend precautions, at least for humans.
On many sites nowadays you see: If you are concerned, you can do this and that and so and so. A
commoner using a cell phone might think, "If the FDA isn't
worried, and if the FCC isn't worried, why bother?" According to
at the very least they should have told me, "This and that is what you should do, given the
outcomes we see in determining the risks." That would also put a little more pressure on
the industry to reduce the amount of radiation emitted by the phones.
The industry has made some improvement to their cell phones since then, so far.
Like I said, the radiation comes from where the antenna is. That location has a major influence on the dose that
the tissue receives there. The antenna has now been moved from right next to your ear to the speaking part. So a
little lower; it gives a little more distance. But it depends on how people use their cell phones
use. As far as I am concerned: at least give certain recommendations, just sensible advice.
People text more, which is good because then you don't hold your phone next to your head. Do people know
when the signal is weak? You can see that on your phone, the number of dashes. When the signal is weak,
the phone has to work harder to keep the communication good. It then emits more radiation
than with a stronger signal.
Josh: In some cases it's thousands of times more. I actually tested it with my
Cornet electrosmog meter. It's really shocking how much your phone's radiation goes up when you
only have one or two bars.
Dr. Melnick: Exactly, but most people don't know that. The FDA should encourage this
kind of information to be out there, instead of just saying we're just ignoring it.

Acceptance and Liability

Josh: How else should the FDA and FCC respond to the NTP results? How
should they apply it?
Dr. Melnick: They should do a quantitative risk analysis. We should be able to
track the exposure levels. It could be an exposure and exposure
duration associated with a cancer risk of, for example, one in 100,000. Take that as a risk:
that people know that the risk is, say, one in 1,000 for calling one hour a day for a year.
I'm just making up these numbers. That you know that the risk is one in 1000 if you keep your mobile
phone next to your head for one hour a day. Then people could say, "Well, that's not a
risk I want to accept." And they would act accordingly.
There is one more aspect, for children, that I am also concerned about. The radiation penetrates
deeper into a child 's brain. Brains are more sensitive to tissue damage factors
in the case of the developing brain. There are many kinds of toys for children
made that are a concern. Because children don't see any difference between a real phone and a
device that looks like it. That should be curtailed.
If you don't know the risk ... It's hard to know how people react. If they understand the risk and
the FDA makes recommendations ... For example, we're working to reduce emissions.
But do give that advice in the meantime. You know, if you're in an elevator and you've only got one
dash, that might not be a good time to call. You also disturb the other
people who are in that confined space with you.
Josh:Yes, a kind of liability applies here, isn't that possible? I mean, it may not be your
expertise, your area of expertise. But what if you think about the reasons that industry and
government have. If they said, Are you in an elevator, or if you only have one line, don't hold the
phone next to your head. Then that would work.
But maybe as they view it, they don't want to cause panic. Because really, they
worry about their liability once it hits a certain threshold. Why else do
Lloyds of London and other major insurance companies not insure wireless products
from companies?
Dr. Melnick:I hadn't thought of that. But it does make sense.

Assumption versus Effects

Josh: What else did you encounter? Tell.
Dr. Melnick: Let me mention this: In addition to the tumors, there were a few other effects. There was also
a condition called cardiomyopathy, heart muscle disease. This is a disease of the
muscle tissues of the heart, which showed a very clear dose response. And there was DNA damage in
the brains of rats.
A number of mechanistic studies have been done since the IARC review in 2011. These
may provide clues as to why there is observable DNA damage in the brain
occurs. In addition, as I said, the rats were exposed during gestation, ie in the
womb, and the young had reduced body weight.
So there also seem to be other effects. And in fact, when you see these kinds of effects, we
now know that that initial assumption - which the research was supposed to challenge - is false. The assumption that the
only effect may be tissue heating is incorrect, as we have tried to control the effect of
temperature to the limit.
Now with several of these effects, we can no longer rely on assumptions when it comes to
wireless devices.
Josh:And in the early 1970s, Dr. Zory Glaser for the United States Navy research 2,300 reports, each containing five pages of effects of microwave radiation of
varying intensities. That should also be mentioned. I mentioned that in my documentary Take
Back Your Power.
Now my question is: So you have looked at different effects and you have
seen different effects in this NTP study. What about all the other possible effects that haven't been looked at?
You can assume that this kind of exposure to microwave radiation affects life - affects biology in
multiple areas. I want to talk about your role, because you have a lot of work
done for the WHO IARC panel.
Dr. Melnick: That's right.
Josh: I also want to ask you, what effect did the NTP study have on the IARC? And could you briefly
summarize the work you have performed for the IARC?

The Interphone study

Dr. Melnick: The IARC panel met in 2011. NTP data was available at the time. At
that point, the IARC panel, as you probably know, concluded that radiofrequency
radiation was potentially carcinogenic to humans.
The IARC has a certain type of process that most people probably don't understand, they do
have no idea. People from all over the world are invited to come to Lyon,
France, to prepare a so-called monograph. That is actually a book. For
radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones, as well as for chemicals, the participants are divided into
four groups. One group looks at the exposures and emissions. The second looks
at animal cancer studies. The third to the available studies in humans or
epidemiology. And the fourth group looks at the mechanistic information available at the time
.
IARC had sponsored a supposedly multinational evaluation of cell phone radiation, under the name
Interphone. This had a major influence on the discussions during the IARC meeting. In addition, a
number of studies had been carried out by the Swedish scientist Lennart Hardell. He had also
reported on numerous studies that found an increased risk of brain cancer;
it was about tumors, gliomas. They also found schwannomas of the nerve sheath near the ear; which
shows agreement between the NTP study and the human studies. At the time,
studies in animals were considered limited.
There were no similar studies with conventional models. There were a number of
so-called promotional studies or co-carcinogenic studies that had a positive effect
showed; but it was very limited. IARC uses certain terms. Limited means that
the data on animals was inconclusive.

Possibly carcinogenic

Dr. Melnick: The data on humans was also considered limited. This
is because different types of studies have been conducted in humans. One of these is a
so-called case-control study. This is a study in which, for example, you have people who have a
certain tumor, or who have died of a tumor, or who have a certain type of cancer. You look at
that population; it could come from a hospital, for example. Then you compare the characteristics of those
population with the same population that does not have that type of cancer. So gender, age, perhaps other
factors, everything else the same.
The Interphone study and Hardell studies were case control studies. The
problem that emerged at the meeting was that a case-control study
may contain bias. Because you question people or their descendants afterwards about the
phone use of the person with cancer. They designed the questionnaire in such a way that it did not
seem to focus exclusively on that one issue. But there may be some bias when someone says, 'Oh,
sure, he used his cell phone on this side of the head and that's where the tumor
originated. " So you have that possibility of bias.
The other type of research concerns the so-called cohort studies. You look at a large
population and try to see within that population whether the tumor ratio is higher in people who use
mobile phones more often, compared to a population in which there is no or much less use
of mobile phones. This type of research gave negative results; but they have major problems
with the classification of the exposure.
For example, if they take a large population, you know, thousands and thousands of people, they
sometimes look at the calling data. But they may not reflect the actual use of the person who has the
telephone subscription. So the cohort studies were negative. The case-control
studies , from Interphone, were positive at the highest exposure level, as were the Hardell studies.
The IARC panel then concluded that human data was limited.
Limited does not mean that there were no effects. It means that there was a causal interpretation
that was credible; but you couldn't get accidental bias or confusion to a reasonable degree
rule out, and so they kept it limited. So if you
have limited results in both humans and animals, the IARC will qualify that as 'possibly carcinogenic' to humans. Limited
in humans but sufficient in animals would have resulted in "probably carcinogenic" to
humans.

The World Health Organization

Josh: There is a movement among scientists, in the world of science,
to reclassify radiofrequency radiation as 2A, "probably carcinogenic," or group 1, "recognized
carcinogen."
Dr. Melnick:Hardell and others have done more studies. In France you have another
study with positive outcome regarding gliomas. There is a nomination process at the IARC for
studies that have been notified and will be evaluated in the near future. They operate
at five-year intervals. As far as I know, radio frequency radiation has been discussed and is on the
list for re-evaluation. I don't think it's fair to say that the societal pressure to classify it
as this or that has to do with it. Because it is an evaluation process.
In 2011 it concerned about 25 people. Judgment plays a big part in all of this. You know, I have mine
own conviction as to what would be appropriate; but others may think otherwise.
It is a scientific debate between the experts during the meeting, who then come to
a conclusion.
Josh: I want to go into more detail before we get to the end of the conversation. You said the FDA is
avoiding its responsibility by
not recognizing and acting on the data from this $ 30 million NTP study . Doesn't the World Health Organization also shirk
its responsibility here?
Dr. Melnick: I think they are in a process. It takes a while to bring all the data together
for a panel. As far as I know, it's in the schedule. I don't know if it's on the roster,
but it's in the plans for the next five years to re-evaluate radiofrequency radiation.

Assumption versus Evidence

Josh: We are switching to 5G. Because in the meantime, as we know, the industry continues to implement
it in the United States and around the world. This is done without
having done any research to show its safety, and without even intending to do any research
. I feel very strongly that it is because they know what they will find when they are real
if they actually did research. Are you very concerned about what is happening,
and if so, why?
Dr. Melnick: Well, I can give a number of reasons. One of these, as you just said, is falling back
on assumptions without data. The assumption is, "Okay, this is safe." But we
should have learned from the radiofrequency radiation from cell phones that assumptions are not necessarily really in the
interest of public health. So I'm saying there should be a certificate of security rather than
just a statement of security.
In fact, recently there was a Senate hearing about 5G and Senator Blumenthal brought
this question emerges. He wanted to be sure of safety and was told, "Well, there is no
consistent evidence of damage." Yes, because there are no studies. And of course, if you don't have any investigations, you ca
n't provide evidence of damage. But you cannot substantiate the assumption that it is safe
. So that's a problem for me.
The other issue is the antennas. Due to the way in which 5G works, the radiation does not get very far.
It also does not pass through buildings. That is why the antennas in neighborhoods are placed very close together
. I hear they might be about 200 to 300 meters apart: on lampposts, something
above street level, just with people walking around. So if you walk past a
lamppost in the city , you are close to an antenna, which emits a type of radiation about which we
know little about effects.
Now 5G does not penetrate the body to the same extent as radio frequency radiation. Well, that's what
they were talking about, okay. Thus, it is largely absorbed into the skin. But are you outside ... remember
when I talked about disruptions? If you are outside in the environment, you are exposed to more
than just 5G radiation. On a sunny day you are exposed to UV radiation. If UV radiation is of influence
on the development of melanomas, what happens when you have 5G radiation and UV radiation together?
We can say, either we assume there is no effect, or we test the hypothesis and
demonstrate that there is no effect. Because what about the eyes? Is there a risk to vision if
people walk past those antennas? Is there any injury? I don't know those answers. But there is
no one who can say they have the answers, because no tests have been carried out.
So I fear that we are exposing the population to something without knowing the risks or the health effects
of it. And I would be happy if there were no adverse health effects. But I would
be happier if I knew proven that there are no adverse health effects, rather than
just an assertion.

The Precautionary Principle

Josh: We know from Dr. Devra Davis and others we speak to at this Summit that there are independent
studies on millimeter-wave radiation that show really extraordinarily serious biological effects
. There is some indication that the effects can penetrate into the body. One study is about
the sweat ducts and how they can act as spiral antennae,
sending energy into the body and causing effects deeper within. Obviously a worrying situation.
What, from your perspective, would it take to change the paradigm, the way
business is done by the industry, those 'grabbing', claims of security
backed by nothing ? They just go for profit, they push and ram it through, no matter how.
You mentioned the precautionary principle - which is not recognized in all countries in Europe - or the principle
of weighing evidence. Would you like to say something about that, what do you think is needed?
Dr. Melnick: It's a tough situation right now, because 5G is political too. In the political sphere
in which we operate, we are in competition with the Chinese. They are developing 5G, and we have to make them work
to win.
Politics also controls what will happen, bypassing local authorities. As they think about
whether you can place cell towers within a municipality - you can't do that. All they
say is: it is possible, it is safe, so we are going to do it.
I think we need to gather the necessary knowledge first. Because the properties of 5G have not
yet been fully determined. When we talk about 5G, we don't even know: what exactly is
being broadcast by those antennas? What are its specifications? We just know it's 5G and it's going to be
a high frequency. How do you test something if you don't even have the specifications of what you
are testing?
I think - instead of getting in here - it would be best to first determine: this is
safe, and that is harmful. Bring industry and the scientific community together and say
we want to address this issue. We want to have safety for health. What do
we need to do to make sure we don't increase health risks by installing these
new antennas in our neighborhoods? Then you get one side opposite the other. And if politics
prefers one side, then it has won.
So the FDA says we will ignore the NTP radiofrequency study. As far as I
can see, there is no pressure on them to do anything except by myself and others
who speak out against it. The government has kept quiet. If they did something, and they
demonstrated the risks, it could cause problems for the industry, for the government
itself, or for the FCC. If RF radiation is a risk, what to do with 5G? They have no
answer for that.

Accountability and Responsibility

Josh: So what you say we really need to take the next step in response to this incredibly important
study that you designed. Because the NTP research is intended for a risk analysis by the FDA.
Dr. Melnick:That would be a first step; with a simultaneous recommendation to take
precautions.
Josh: And also investigate the frequencies of 5G, look much broader, bring in science. For
that to happen, the voice of the population is needed. As you said, you and a number of others are speaking
out against this. But we need people to put pressure on the agencies, which unfortunately
are dominated by commercial interests. And also liability actions to
hold them accountable ; responsibility and accountability must be there.
Dr. Melnick:Unfortunately, our system works in such a way that if the regulators do nothing, the decision is made in
court. It's the lawsuits that sometimes enforce something that
is ignored by the government . That's how it happened with a number of chemicals. I am not
involved in any lawsuits over radiofrequency radiation, but I understand there are currently a few pending cases involving people
who have developed brain cancer.
To me, that's not the way our health should be protected. It is better
if the government, scientists, regulators and industry would work together and
say, we don't want problems, how can we avoid them?
Josh:Thank you. Dr. Ronald Melnick, thank you very much for your time, for your many years of work as a
scientist and your help in defining and putting into perspective this problem; for your
efforts to resolve this issue. Thanks again.
Dr. Melnick: I really hope there will be a solution someday. By the way, there's another person who ... I do
n't know if you interviewed him or if he was going to be interviewed ... did you
speak to Senator Blumenthal ? Namely, he raised this issue, but received no answer. Has he
received an answer since then? Is he still going after it? Because - and we talked about that already -
it's about the people who get in the gun. With a senator you are stronger; just like with
people who have a little knowledge of the matter. It would be interesting to hear what Senator
Blumenthal says to your questions.
Josh: We haven't been able to get in touch with him, but it's a really good idea. We
haven't actually heard anything back at all.
Dr. Melnick: I want to be a contact person.
Josh: Thank you. (VG)

onawah

12th May 2021, 03:03

Satellites, Data, and Nature
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
5/11/21
from: Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>

https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/UhVFWZK5hlDWwmWqbVTfw8PlpMkP5p1NOk6OBeSp7i6UOKzQ1kzu4CJ6rlgTg3VmFfFLMft4Sb-349ee5ijbggY9i9oYiG04sX5Lc4GZgfX8BAVu6x014IOcDYjUw6l53tvcQ6YvNbXZXcqdQTHcojtwfM-3dVr1bMqs88Ty48aQkwjZ28pCbwgeKCpPrXtlTf692yR4KuvMo-ZhFmz6q60QUkog7TcfN1EXu7JOdIEx6ypZdGoM5uPhJJG_k6lCpC3PTmBCBSHrpRN62ug1hshaeAvmKx85gp_pxQx0jrosX1DUk0 tXIUFU2P6abotVIsc7gVc_m6ygzufy7_eJ29gO7Cj8rVzr9C1ool07Fac2olZgZXFnvCBzzskk4K7IC1P8iM2c1wanXARAHoNQKK 3W34AzBDYtvGqA6OwrdOLyAv8-b0eeoHv-9chEO5qTOqxHLTxNnbje8YOM7OctPu1uqVdlT9j27SCsoop932WINZ9m86UMI5Y=s0-d-e1-ft#http://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=rs2EoO7aCalgsAFr_kogTNFE2w4L2 VU26VVawCj61JP4JwY5YW4PLMSDa1ZWm7IX7yAVQOPbPRoY6Y1ynhPUfDnOBnuCMJhzjb8HdRGgc-zUNOxU4gjuCH9w1mIuFxb1cxHSwA6QnOWFJwpJMG-2GFI8_m0Lyk7AC_fQCOcRMh1OpY_V8HoWTEkLtNqNQXc-Qa5SOds1NWJb4KiUUp_TVw35Ihd_0RasChAfU7AvOmV7

"The purpose of these newsletters is to inform, support, and collaborate in bringing humanity out of denial. Levels of radio-frequency radiation that are
10 billion times higher than what life evolved with are destroying this planet.
TO SUBSCRIBE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe/

SATELLITES, DATA, AND NATURE

Two years ago, in May 2019, I wrote an article titled Planetary Emergency, in which I explained what was about to happen to our world, listed the board members, chief officers and principal investors in SpaceX and OneWeb, and asked for help in reaching out to them. I wrote:

“Please contact me if you know any of the gentlemen or ladies I have listed, or if you know someone who can get us an audience with one of them. All we need is one. An opening into that community of billionaires, to begin a dialogue that will save this planet...

“All these people have families and children and have a stake in the future of the Earth. Some -- for example, Kimbal Musk and his wife, Christiana -- are long-time advocates for the environment and investors in environmental causes.”

In two years not a single person has answered that plea, and we are now only months away from global catastrophe. Below I will update you on the extraordinary escalation of the assault on the Earth’s life-giving envelope that is in progress, and I will renew my call for help.

MARCH 24, 2021 AND BEYOND

Last month’s newsletter (Survey Results) contained a summary of about 1,000 emails I received from subscribers reporting sudden illness in themselves and their spouses, children, parents, neighbors, friends, coworkers, clients, cats, dogs, chickens, goats, and cows that I received from all over the world. On March 24-25, the first time that SpaceX and OneWeb both launched satellites on the same day, most people that I spoke with or heard from experienced similar, dramatic illness that came out of nowhere. Pain and itching all over their bodies, especially their legs, feet and head. Sudden increase in the ringing in their ears. Profound exhaustion and complete inability to sleep. Muscle spasms. Skin rashes. Stomach aches and diarrhea. Nosebleeds. Heart palpitations. Inflamed eyes. Ill temper, depression or suicidal thoughts.

In the following weeks it became clear that something extraordinary had happened, and is continuing to happen, not only to my friends and subscribers, and not only to people and their pets and farm animals.

In my newsletter of May 5, 2020 (The Evidence Mounts), I reported the sudden illness and deaths of thousands of blue tits and other small birds in Germany, in the Mosel River Valley and other areas with poor cell phone reception. They were described as “apathetic birds with breathing problems.” This occurred during March and April 2020, while Vodafone was upgrading its cell phone service in these regions from 2G to 4G LTE and building hundreds of new cell towers.

The German environmental organization NABU has been monitoring the health of these birds ever since and, like illnesses in the humans I heard from, blue tit deaths spiked in Germany beginning on March 25, 2021:

And lest anyone think that there aren’t animals that know what is going on, consider this report from a subscriber in Ireland:

“One of our cats now sometimes howls during the night, then takes my daughter upstairs, stands by the WiFi box demanding it’s turned off, then settles down to sleep.”

As I reported in my last newsletter, March 25 registered the second highest number of COVID-19 cases worldwide this year, and the fifth highest since the pandemic began.

There was a sudden spate of mass shootings in the U.S. in the news in March and April. A colleague asked me if that, too, had spiked on March 24 or 25. It had. The number of mass shootings rose suddenly on March 25 and remained high for three weeks. An average of 6 shootings involving 4 or more victims occurred every day between March 25 and April 13.

There were strange natural anomalies reported as well, that I cannot explain but neither can anyone else. A woman in Hoboken, New Jersey took this picture of worms arranging themselves in a great spiral on the sidewalk. It was on March 25, 2021:

And photographs of hundreds of unusually silent sheep, also arranged in a perfect spiral, were taken by by Christopher Hogg, a lecturer at Royal Holloway University, London on March 26, 2021:.

SPACEX TO BEGIN COMMERCIAL SERVICE THIS SUMMER
OneWeb to Begin Service by End of Year

Both SpaceX and OneWeb have announced that they plan to begin commercial service this year. They are both racing to convert the most beautiful place in the world, whose unchanging vista has given a sense of peace and belonging to millions of generations of people, animals and birds -- the heavens -- into the world’s largest garbage dump, streaking with moving lights and the refuse of burned up and exploded satellites.

With its launches of April 28, May 4 and May 9, 60 more satellites per launch, SpaceX now has 1,554 operating Starlink satellites in low orbit around the Earth. For command and control of these satellites it has already built 61 ground stations in the U.S., 1 in Canada , 6 in New Zealand, 9 in Australia, 2 in Germany, 2 in France, 3 in the UK, and 7 in Chile, and many more are under construction. More than 10,000 customers are now beta testing the satellite network, and 500,000 people worldwide have pre-ordered user terminals. SpaceX expects to fill all their orders and begin commercial service of high-speed Internet from space this summer. At that time, users will still only be able to receive stationary service in a single location. By the end of 2021, SpaceX expects to also be able to provide mobile service anywhere in the world with user terminals that can be mounted on ships, planes, RVs and trucks.

With its launch of 36 more satellites on April 25, OneWeb now has 182 satellites in low polar orbit. It has announced that by June of this year, after two more launches, it will be able to provide connectivity to the UK, Alaska, northern Europe, Greenland, Iceland, the Arctic Seas and Canada, that it will begin commercial service to those northern regions before the end of this year, and that it will provide global service in 2022.

SpaceX states in its application to the FCC for approval of its mobile user terminals that it is responding to consumer demand. It states that by 2022 approximately 4,800 billion gigabytes of data will be exchanged worldwide per year. “No longer are users willing to forego connectivity while on the move,” writes SpaceX.

And that is exactly the problem. People are treating data, which didn’t even exist as a commodity until the 1990s, as their God-given right. They do not understand that “data” is not something abstract but has its source in a finite and increasingly scarce natural world. That when you manipulate “data” you are manipulating forests, oceans and wildlife. People do not understand that the more data you shoot all over the world, the quicker you scramble this planet’s ecosystems until there is nothing left of them.

Meanwhile, building and launching rockets is becoming quicker, easier and cheaper all the time. A company called Relativity Space is now able to produce rockets using the world’s largest 3-D printer, dubbed “Stargate.” It already has contracts with Lockheed Martin, Telesat, Iridium and other companies and plans to begin launching its disposable rockets this fall. It advertises on its website that its rockets have “100 times fewer parts” and that it can go “from raw material to flight in 60 days.”

Now, virtually anyone can destroy the Earth.

SECOND CALL FOR HELP

The list of board members, officers and investors in SpaceX and OneWeb in Planetary Emergency is still accurate. I remain convinced that Kimbal Musk, who is both an environmentalist and a board member of SpaceX, as well as being the younger brother of Elon Musk, is the most likely person to begin a dialogue with us. If you would like to help me contact him, please get in touch with me."

Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
May 11, 2021

The last 18 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, and French. "

s7e6e

12th May 2021, 07:57

I think there's no more point in fighting the manifestations of these low level vibrating individuals. The fight worth fighting, the only one with colossal potential, is spiritual. Manifest your will every single day and night. Wish the change, will the change!

The only thing they have access to, is the crude low vibration matter. It's the only thing they can change.

onawah

19th May 2021, 00:28

Internet of Things: What IoT Deployment Means for Your EMF Exposure
By R Blank
Last Updated
May 17, 2021
https://www.shieldyourbody.com/internet-of-things/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=The+Biggest+Risk+of+5G&utm_campaign=20210518+-+IoT+-+Intro+++Post&vgo_ee=skdpDJCXllVoqWOVbfck%2BA%3D%3D

"The Internet of Things, or IoT, is a huge jump for humanity at a technological level. Tech pioneer Kevin Ashton coined the term in 1999, and his vision was for computers to manage all individual things. When the IoT began, it promised a revolution in the way we live and work, and so far, it hasn’t failed to impress us.

From when the IoT was just a concept to this day, we’ve seen mind-blowing developments in the tech industry. We now have machines doing things for us that once required hours of manual labor.

But the Internet of Things doesn’t only come with benefits — it has a downside that requires a more in-depth exploration. This is the EMF side.

IoT systems emit a hefty amount of EMF, which adds to our already EMF-polluted environment. And that’s a concern on a number of levels.

So, let’s dive into this topic to better understand the IoT’s pros and cons and how you can protect yourself from the EMF problem it will eventually cause.

Table of Contents
What is the Internet of Things?
The Internet of Things essentially refers to the billions of devices, objects and appliances connected to the internet through wireless networks.

Related Articles
EMF Radiation Health Dangers for Women: 3 Things To Know
EMF & Nutrition: Foods & Supplements That Protect Against EMF Exposure
Why Use Wifi Calling? To Cut Your EMF Radiation Exposure
Home Office & EMF: How to Reduce EMF Exposure When Working from Home?
EMF & Brain Health: How EMF Exposure Affects Your Brain’s Functioning

An additional characteristic of an IoT device is that it can send your user data to the cloud of whichever company manages it, which then uses machine learning to decode your behavior and enhance your user experience.

https://www.shieldyourbody.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/IoT-diagram-devices-and-internet-of-things-600x390.png

Thanks to the omnipresence of wireless internet, you can now turn anything from a pill to an airplane into an IoT object.

How Does IoT Work?
The IoT uses smart computer chips for data collection. It collects things like your location and gadget-specific behavior. The company from whom you’ve purchased the device keeps a cloud where they gather the data and analyze it using AI or artificial intelligence. It then puts the analyzed data into a machine learning software that identifies and applies the necessary changes required to enhance your user experience.

The process of machine learning is relatively simple – not the development part obviously, but the way it works. It’s automatic, and it learns and grows using the collected data.

Think of this: whenever you search a certain video on YouTube and watch it along with 2-3 similar videos, the next time you refresh your homepage, it will be filled with videos similar to what you previously searched. That’s machine learning at work.

IoT uses a similar program to understand your behavior and make changes accordingly. A real-life example of IoT would be smart refrigerators. These refrigerators scan most of the products and send a notification to your phone whenever a certain product is about to expire or run out.

Smartphones also play a crucial role in the IoT infrastructure, as most of these products come with a mobile phone application.

IoT Devices
There are many categories of IoT devices. Some of them are available right now, and some are in their developmental phase. These categories include:

Home appliances
Home security systems
Farming equipment
Smartwatches like Fitbit and Apple watch
Factory equipment
Inventory trackers
Biometric cybersecurity scanners
Shipping container and logistics tracking
Connected cars, and many more.
Here’s an interesting thing that IoT experts say: In the future, we won’t need traffic lights. Self-driving vehicles will overtake the market, and since they will be connected to the internet, these cars will be able to communicate with each other without any human intervention.

Data on the internet travels at the speed of light, so your car can notify another car that it’s coming from a certain direction at a certain speed, and all other cars on the road will adjust accordingly.

They even go as far as to say that, since AI reacts a thousand times faster than humans, road accidents will be a thing of the past.

IoT Applications
The current IoT infrastructure is distributed into different categories according to their design like consumer, medical, infrastructure, and military.

Consumer Applications
A major portion of IoT devices are created for consumer use. This is partly because of the expensive nature of IoT. Without selling it to the general public, it would be tough to continue its development and reach its highest potential.

Some of the device categories that I mentioned above are designed specifically for consumer use.

You may have heard of smart homes, one of the most outstanding achievements in IoT development. These homes can have a lot of benefits, especially for the elderly and people with disabilities.Smart homes are also referred to as home automation because almost everything in these homes is automatic. From lighting, heating, air conditioning, and security systems to media and camera systems, everything has its own intelligence to knows when to operate. And if a certain automation feature isn’t for you, you can control it right from your phone.

For instance, let’s say that you leave for work at 9 a.m and arrive home at around 6. After a few days of sampling, you can expect things like your heater heating your room to the perfect temperature right before you arrive and your lights turning off automatically right after you leave.

Similarly, elder care and assisting people with disabilities is one of the key features of home automation. It can monitor for things like medical emergencies and perform various duties to make life easier.

Medical Applications
Internet of Medical Things, or IoMT, sometimes referred to as “smart healthcare,” is also one of the public-benefitting uses of the Internet of Things. This is primarily dedicated to patient health monitoring, especially after implant device surgeries.

Smartwatch companies have also contributed to the IoMT infrastructure by developing products that allow patient health monitoring.

Infrastructure Applications
The infrastructural side of IoT monitors and controls operations of sustainable urban and rural infrastructures. It sends real-time data from places like bridges and railway tracks, allowing the authorities to increase safety where required and lower the risk of accidents.

Examples of IoT’s infrastructural applications are metropolitan scale deployments, energy management, environmental monitoring, and living labs.

Military Applications
Internet of Military Things are IoT devices used for surveillance, recon, and many other combat-related strategies.

Recently, the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) launched the Internet of Battlefield Things project. This project focuses on basic IoT-related science to enhance a soldier’s abilities on a battlefield.

Similarly, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) also launched a project named “Ocean of Things,” which they use to monitor environmental and vessel activities data.

IoT is Vulnerable
Even though IoT is relatively new, there’s a huge competition between tech companies to be the first ones to release new concepts. Because of this, they have to work faster, and the time crunch sometimes leaves security gaps in the devices.

These vulnerabilities obviously don’t reach the IoT’s military applications because of the strict testing phases products go through before being deployed to the military.

The devices that I am referring to are the ones sold to the general public.

Dark Reading, one of the most-read cybersecurity news sites on the internet, says that IoT is exposed to the eight most common firmware vulnerabilities.

These vulnerabilities are:

Unauthenticated access
Weak authentication
Hidden back doors
Password hashes
Encryption keys
Buffer overflows
Open-source code
Debugging services
So, even if you buy these devices, you need to make sure that you follow the best cybersecurity practices.

Relationship Between IOT and 5G
5G was engineered from the ground-up to support the network requirements of IoT. This is because IoT devices require a high-speed internet connection with minimal latency, and the current 4G infrastructure isn’t enough to support its needs.

According to the GSMA, 1.8 billion users will connect to 5G by 2025, which means that the massive deployment of high-performing IoT gadgets is not too far away.

The 5G Concern
Contrary to what most tech companies say, non-ionizing radiation has been proven to cause health issues ranging from minor sleep disorders to chronic diseases like cancer. There are literally thousands of peer-reviewed research papers on this subject, and together they make it crystal clear that EMF affects humans, flora, and fauna.

The current 5G network also comes under the non-ionizing category of EMF, but it operates on a much higher frequency than 4G. A paper published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health says that 5G lacks clarity on what tech is being used and lacks enough scientific evidence to be considered entirely safe. Adding to this, they conclude that 5G deployment should be halted until enough research is done and we know for sure that it’s safe for living beings.I have an entire series of articles dedicated to 5G. There I talk about the nature of 5G, its health risks, and the actions you can take to protect yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QYoi1TK9Q8

What Does Massive IoT Deployment Mean for You?
We’re already facing unprecedented levels of EMF in our environment. This is often referred to as EMF pollution because its presence is unnatural, is increasing, and, though invisible, is detrimental to human health. With gadgets like cell phones, WiFi routers, smart meters, laptops, and tablets, it is more challenging than ever to escape heavy EMF exposure.

On top of that, the number of new gadgets being introduced to the market continues to explode. For example, just when we thought we had all the Apple devices we could ever need, along came AirTags – tiny, button-sized tracking devices that attach to your most important personal belongings.

While sticking an Apple AirTag to your car keys will certainly make it harder to lose them, this technology means that a plethora of your personal items – like your keys or you wallet – that are not currently sources of EMF, will become sources of EMF. This is a clear and immediate example of the impending explosion in the number of sources of EMF to which we are exposed in our daily lives.

Right now, it is still possible to lower your exposure by reducing your tech use and maximizing your distance from EMF sources.

This most certainly won’t be the case when IoT devices deploy on a massive scale.

IoT devices depend on 5G, which has a shorter range than 4G. This means that small cells (portable 5G towers) will have to be installed everywhere, emitting high-frequency EMF on a huge scale.

We still don’t know what frequency the 5G network will operate on when it reaches its full potential. The chances are that our current EMF shielding techniques like using conductive materials will start to fail, because conductive materials like silver have a limit to the amount of EMF they can shield.

This could leave us in a vulnerable state where high-frequency EMF is everywhere, and there isn’t much that we can do about it.

What Can You Do?
IoT devices only emit EMF when they’re connected to a network. So, IoT is indeed a matter of concern, but so is 5G. If there’s no 5G, the IoT deployment will automatically decrease.

But my goal is not to keep you from enjoying new technology. I just want you to take the necessary precautions to make it safer to use.

Again, you can visit my 5G content hub to learn more about the subject.

Recently, lots of people are asking their respective governments to stop the 5G rollout. And many countries have also invoked a temporary halt to 5G deployment until research confirms that it is safe.

You can share your knowledge with your family and friends. But note that you’ll have to talk with them in a way that convinces them to make changes in their lives.

For this, I’ve created an EMF advocacy training guide which you can download for free.

The second step would be to refrain from buying unnecessary tech gadgets. This is actually a big problem. Every year people purchase new tech gadgets and realize later on that they didn’t even need them.

Reducing unnecessary tech purchases will reduce your EMF exposure by a lot. This is super important to remember, especially in a few years when IoT gadgets will roll out on a massive scale. They’ll certainly look amazing and some may give you incredible benefits. But do I actually need this? — is the question you should be asking every time it crosses your mind.

Final Thoughts
The Internet of Things is certainly a massive leap for humanity. It promises to give us things that we’ve never seen or experienced before, and there’s not a shred of doubt about its ability to change our lives.

Our current ways will be old someday, and it’s inevitable that we’ll be completely tech-dependent given the pace at which the tech industry is advancing.

But we’re not there yet. IoT and 5G haven’t reached their full potential. So right now, your main goal should be to keep yourself and your loved ones safe from the increasing levels of EMF that are currently in our environment.

Minimizing your tech use and maximizing your distance from EMF sources will take you far in the journey of reducing your EMF exposure.

There are many other ways to mitigate your exposure further, and I’ve written about them all on this blog. You can start by browsing my Healthy Living Tips. It’s accessible to everyone and the tips are mostly free or affordable to implement, so you’ve nothing to lose by giving them a shot.

Resources
5G
Safety Tips
Health Effects
Babies & Children
EMF in the Home
Safety Regulations
EMF Tech
EMF Testing
Advocacy
Shop Protection
Phones
Headsets
Headsets
Apparel
Babies
Laptops & Tablets
Home & Office
Related Articles
EMF Radiation Health Dangers for Women: 3 Things To Know
EMF & Nutrition: Foods & Supplements That Protect Against EMF Exposure
Why Use Wifi Calling? To Cut Your EMF Radiation Exposure
Home Office & EMF: How to Reduce EMF Exposure When Working from Home?
EMF & Brain Health: How EMF Exposure Affects Your Brain’s Functioning"

onawah

12th June 2021, 19:19

EMFs, ADHD, Autism and The Brain Immune Gut Masterclass
From: Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense lloyd@electricsenseinterviews101.com via gmail.mcsv.net
https://us20.campaign-archive.com/?u=20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766&id=0be7b542d9
6/12/21

"Wrapping up this week, I am so grateful to share several powerful events and opportunities. This is a little longer than usual. Please take your time and go through all of this valuable information, in a step-by-step way, so you don’t miss anything.

Thank you for sharing today’s newsletter and features with those you love. Enjoy!

First, for those families navigating ADHD and Autism, there are several tools to support you today, including a free 15-minute consultation with Brain Harmony Group (who recently won the NBCOT Award for the incredible results they’re getting with children on the spectrum and supporting the elderly who are dealing with cognition issues). Click here to learn more: https://ui548.isrefer.com/go/Attention/LB2021/ (These links might only open in Chrome.)

And, for ALL families who are managing more stress than normal during this time, or sorting through anxiety due to ever-increasing EMF connectivity, click here to download “4 Steps to Creating Calm in the Home” https://ui548.isrefer.com/go/CALMhome/LB2021/

VIP Invitation to discover my EMF Solutions Club

The truth is that protecting your loved ones - young and old - from the omnipresent threat of EMF toxicity and how it especially impacts the brain - must be an every day TOP priority. So I want to invite you to join my EMF Solutions Club.

In it, you get unlimited (immediate) access to a unique audio resource of over 150 solution oriented interviews on EMFs and health, plus a monthly live Q&A where you can get all your EMF questions answered (by me), plus two new interviews (and the transcriptions) with world class experts, researchers and educators every month.

You will ALSO get a huge gift - The EMF Fast Start Pack (Easy Steps to See a Significant Improvement in Your Health In 30 Days or Less). In this dynamic 4 part BONUS package (previously sold for $197) you’ll learn:
The 4 distinct categories of EMF exposures you need to measure and how precisely to measure them so you can maximise your chances of fast relief
The number one thing you must understand to effectively deal with EMFs… overlook this and you can spend years wasting your time and slip into chronic illness
When and when not to shield from EMF exposures – because shielding can sometimes make matters worse
The 5 steps you need to follow to achieve effective whole room shielding and 3 things to consider before buying shielding film
The systematic holistic model and ‘secret sauce’ which forms the basis of my unique step by step approach to ‘Ultimate EMF Protection’
The 3 detox protocols you need to integrate into your health regime to open the door to some very powerful results – literally overnight in my case
The key tool which allows you to create a ‘feedback loop’, tune into the minute changes in your condition and practically guarantee a successful recovery
The 3 free and easy subtle energy healing modalities which when used daily can render a massive improvement in your health – I continue to use them every day!
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Fs1DMh2jc8c39pi9oim5YhKgUt3C-8Z-VeMUVstYttmvJWv4dLH19-VDC7VuM9YiAwwLAWCywo88cYZkfrL1LxX1u3tDwkWPS7COD9O8768SNUUEzJsFrk6tuiaxmN-kphx60dZWRiSKA3al_Pwswy8uPPTmww=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766/images/6bb3f961-d5fb-ce35-1d22-f1e17a6cfd14.png
Please click above to learn more and join for only $19.95 per month:
https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/offer-aw1/
I AM SPEAKING TODAY - JUNE 12 - at the BRAIN DEGENERATION SUMMIT

Yes, my talk on the Brain Degeneration Summit is TODAY (the day I am mailing this weekly wrap up). But don’t worry if you open this late - there is an encore weekend where you can still get my talk - coming up on June 19th and 20th. Click here to get my talk: “EMFs - The Missing Link in Brain Health?”
Learn how EMFs impact brain health
5G: Should you be concerned?
Protecting your brain health
It’s never too late to make changes to optimize your brain health, it’s also never too early, so get started today to live your best life!

Remember, many causes of cognitive decline are also related to constant exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and are treatable — even potentially curable. And for many struggling with neurodegeneration, protecting yourself and your family is crucial.

https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/TCmi2rp_9AwaMYSiI0NESq_Q1WT1uCxEYF1hOsOwJP_ef3wgYAAN_sACTLfPSDiXlFA-CwjKOvhBwgSMqtoSaMU4JZ9DWcuNXwjmeHK1Gpv06gRLz81RNbGVKRSntEhrzzDgg_TSyNJUI6GWdCCv94MyzMxKTg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766/images/03184dc9-ae88-37b6-2757-75de584f082e.png
In case you need it, here’s the link to join this event. https://braindegeneration.byhealthmeans.com/?idev_id=11469 (These links might only open in Chrome.)
UNLOCKING ADHD & AUTISM WITH PERSONALIZED NUTRITION

Learn about the link between food sensitivities and behavior challenges, symptoms and testing options. EMF protection is important, clearly, but nutrition can turn things around — from despair to hope, from struggle to improved behavior.

Get the vital information you need to:
Understand how diet and nutrition can improve autism and ADHD
Personalize a special diet that supports health and healing
Navigate past common picky eater issues
Empower kids to get involved in the kitchen

https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/CsHkCEPt0CsaOe36pt79OTT3PqhkxOMYvnuX8OXLtZc9055ijLu8Z43VU0GRKVtoemGCIuCYpaA6KE02E2nDjy44qC3gPl7q8Tri mecsLTAXMDJ6-7LE6SXuVelIcPXDWTW5QP3BLD08gPI-Fx0AhmtzNkhbSg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766/images/eac42fac-3c6a-7952-c747-20ec2909dbd3.png
Please pass this event along to those families you know and love who are navigating the spectrum with their kids. Just knowing events like this are out there can add inspiration - and tools - to their journey. https://nourishinghope.byhealthmeans.com/?idev_id=11469
Discover a Powerful New Masterclass on the: BRAIN - IMMUNE - GUT AXIS

Make no mistake, your brain is command central, and when one part of the Brain-Immune-Gut Axis becomes defective, due to toxic load (including EMFs), the other parts start to malfunction. Here’s what that looks like:

* Brain symptoms such as brain fog, fatigue, depression, memory loss, anxiety
* Immune symptoms such as autoimmune disease, inflammation, infections
* Gut symptoms such as gas, bloating, heartburn, reflux, IBS
* And more…

Removing these triggers and stabilizing your fuel delivery mechanisms can jumpstart your quality of life and heal your body from the inside out!

I hope you will sign up to attend the upcoming BIG Masterclass, offered at no cost by Dr. Peter Kan. No cost, just priceless information for my community. Don’t miss it!

This masterclass does a deep dive on immunity and the gut / brain axis and how to reduce inflammation and toxic load.

https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/rSlRY_-9elV3FWyKPOW5N4Yp4zNN4rspLYkK2vapANKXW7VaAHdYtGzOkRCU15zGTHUs7yeBh7VZagUYw4oN5mciCJyXyRdpKtfVOkA0_PQ d4J0sKV74YU5t_9ihhQxi4kLL46YAuvt93GcsIRgcHeXual7a8g=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766/images/990ef54c-9164-408f-a788-45fe4998c701.jpg
Click here to attend and share this event: https://wy270.isrefer.com/go/6260/LloydBurrell/ (These links might only open in Chrome.)
Thank you for your time today.

Don’t forget to download your 36-PAGE Neurometabolic Gut Repair Program to reduce inflammation, tame food sensitivities, and optimize your brain, immune and gut health!

This is loaded with powerful new protocols to protect and improve your gut health to optimize your BRAIN health journey.

And feel free to share the link: https://wy270.isrefer.com/go/gutrepair/LloydBurrell

Thank you for your time today. I know there was a lot to cover, but there’s no minimizing how important brain health is - and how, because of neuroplasticity, we can ALWAYS improve our brain.

To you and your family,

Lloyd Burrell "
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!
EMF protection is IMPORTANT
please share ElectricSense emails
with your friends and colleagues.
Please share ElectricSense emails
with your friends and colleagues.

Our mailing address is:
ElectricSense
132 avenue de rochefort
Royan 17200
France

onawah

4th July 2021, 04:02

INTERFERING WITH THE FIRES OF LIFE
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
6/30/21
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Interfering-with-the-Fires-of-Life.pdf
https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/eStofqt-ocSePp8maWPAwOs1NhYq8c_C3JStRr7CEbd5sW7IKznEb06wCFN267n1OVKtASdPGTmQY6ESswdrhMOB3aLaRiXlSnIwxUC9aufn rtVlrWuUgClVg8L81umd1B5kwGNPpAoYwbCYsLskcEAo3ITHbJPxS-Qgu9CIqn7_csBXXOPkyKwJPEytKqJdIHowXZQtK0-qTo2EOBpFi_h3HPs7nx3ydMRBtCiiCataAEue5y9zpYbAMGSmacbVHkxVbRdJ09lXRA7k4Uvx1U5DVU-CQj0Q8nfZxdK76KdxEJRLUThf_oNwJAhEmn92wVRRbPiX0Au6nAzpW0tTbZMqoSIte1HFS4NChh5hmzYFRY5oGIvBM71hwAlCjKg m2x1jgwbS94nRmeXrgsg4pbMGHaCfjkd1gjHvevwpVd7gmB-M07weLpxKPrFn_FL8H1DmipyuWicOpRuPtCtVBBWRycqxzxiVkj-wMPaoU23BFVpSj6IjUOE3=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=mph5yb_hi-nkn0TNz9oU0-0F84Gi6FeM8LZd6Eg3LtxSp2_kkj1xS-z4PQ76LAUjCt3equI8XlG9SIB1oEkFQqalSXy8Z1irStJkfchzUK_yBzLQJ66lOC1EWU_1MkghjiYdTmWx8f4_MDn5bmihe653Za BmUwJlIkHdwnvpHUttm4a5EPt8c-RLGjmH7GTHAZG4lKr7HLwTsG6i0Q-3b9B-BWZQOjvEGj8z_jH3LrVS

To forward this newsletter via social media, copy and paste this link:
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Interfering-with-the-Fires-of-Life.pdf

"Eating and breathing are the fundamental requirements of life. But the energy for life also requires combustion: the food we eat must combine with the oxygen we breathe. This combustion takes place inside our cells in tiny structures called mitochondria. And within our mitochondria are even tinier structures called electron transport chains. These are the invisible wires that carry the electrons generated by the digestion of our food to the molecules of oxygen supplied by our lungs and blood. Anything that interferes with these tiny electric currents interferes with life.

Wireless technology, by bombarding our cells with complex, pulsed, modulated electromagnetic fields, plays havoc with these currents of life. The whole process of eating, breathing, digesting, and producing energy -- the process of living -- slows down. We are seeing the consequences everywhere.

Diabetes, Heart Disease and Cancer

When the electron-generating enzymes in our mitochondria cannot keep up with the volume of sugars, fats and proteins being supplied by our digestive system, those components of our diet accumulate in our blood.

The accumulation of sugar in the blood, and its excretion by the kidneys, is called diabetes, a disease that was so rare before 1860 that most doctors never saw a case during their lifetime. Eating sugar, no matter how much, once did not cause diabetes.

The accumulation of fats in the blood, and their deposition in the walls of our arteries, including our coronary arteries, causes heart disease, which was uncommon in 1850 and almost never occurred except in infants and the elderly. Cholesterol, and high-fat diets, once did not cause heart disease. Later, the same changes occurred in zoo animals. Heart disease, for example, did not exist in any animals in the Philadelphia Zoo before 1945. And the first heart attacks ever recorded in zoo animals occurred in 1955. Yet sclerosis of the coronary arteries increased so rapidly that by 1963, over 90 percent of all mammals and 72 percent of all birds that died in the zoo had coronary disease, while 24 percent of the mammals and 10 percent of the birds had had heart attacks. Similar trends were reported from the London Zoo and the Zoo of Antwerp.

When our cells are starved of oxygen because they cannot use all the oxygen we breathe, sometimes they revert to anaerobic (non-oxygen using) metabolism and become cancerous. Cancer, too, was once quite rare. In 1850 it was the 25th most common cause of death in the U.S., behind accidental drowning. Even tobacco smoking, before about 1920, did not cause lung cancer. And during the 1930s and 1940s the rates of both malignant and benign tumors increased dramatically among many families of mammals and birds at the Philadelphia Zoo.

The modern pandemic of obesity is also an electrical disease caused not by overeating and lack of exercise but by the same slowing down of metabolism. Depending on our genetic disposition, our bodies either excrete a large portion of our digested food unused, causing weight loss, or else convert much of the carbohydrates and fats we eat into fatty tissues, causing obesity. Obesity has been steadily increasing, worldwide, not only in humans, but in zoo animals, laboratory animals, pets, farm animals, and wild animals, due to the increase in radiation.

Longevity

Contrary to popular belief, the lengthening of the human life span is not due to modern medicine. It is instead caused by the interference with metabolism that slows down our rate of living. And also contrary to popular belief, this is not a good thing: we are all living slower, sicker, less vital lives. This was observed in 1880 by Dr. George Miller Beard in his book on neurasthenia: “Although [neurasthenia] may tend to prolong life and to protect the system against febrile and inflammatory disease, yet the amount of suffering that [it] cause[s] is enormous.” And the same observation was made by Yasuo Kagawa in 1978 about the remarkable increase in lifespan in Japan: “Extended life expectancy but increased diseases.”

This, too, has been occurring in both humans and animals.

The evidence for what I have summarized so far is set out in detail in chapters of my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life: Chapter 11, “Irritable Heart”; Chapter 12, “The Transformation of Diabetes”; Chapter 13, “Cancer and the Starvation of Life”; and Chapter 14, “Suspended Animation.”

The rest of this newsletter is devoted to additional evidence that has been brought to my attention only recently.

Normal Body Temperature is Decreasing

Dousing the fires of life by interfering with metabolism might be expected to lower the body’s temperature. And it is so.

Two weeks ago, Dr. Mark Thompson, a biochemist in the UK, called my attention to a paper published by a group of doctors at the Stanford University School of Medicine. They pointed out that normal body temperature is no longer 37° Celsius (98.6° Fahrenheit), but that it in fact has been steadily declining for close to 150 years. Their paper, published January 7, 2020, is titled “Decreasing human body temperature in the United States since the Industrial Revolution.” The data they relied on were hundreds of thousands of temperature measurements taken from three databases: the Union Army Veterans of the Civil War (measurement years 1862-1930); the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES) (1971-1975); and the Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment (STRIDE) (2007-2017).

Because these scientists could not figure out what could make body temperature drop so steadily, they attributed it to “physiologic evolution” instead of to an environmental factor.

Another study, this time of the Tsimane’ people in the Bolivian Amazon, came to my attention a few days ago. It is titled “Rapidly declining body temperature in a tropical human population.” Most Tsimane’ villages still have no electricity, but in 2004, many of the villagers acquired cell phones, radios, antennas, light bulbs, and solar panels, and in 2009 a 374-kilometer, 115-kilovolt transmission line was completed through the area. The line runs close to about a 50-kilometer stretch of the Maniqui River, where many of the villages are located. Today there is cell phone service for at least 25 kilometers, and probably farther, in every direction from the only town, San Borja. 16,800 measurements of body temperature were made between 2003 and 2018. During this period of time, normal body temperature plummeted among these people from 37.4° C (99.3° F) to 36.4° C (97.5° F).

I have charted all the data from both these papers on the same graph:

https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/cjz5nPjezlS5DVEmlVC5hjnJZbvL1Np1Mlh-BNNEVYFJN6HfDA8JEdxTUVltcyMfmagz_PdbkZnho7PdXOrgfK5NIrEF3TxUqF4gmE7PgstsGqBlWcLQsjkJHh3zfBZvwmZVLiaL pPQlDXcr3LdYkaO3_AxmKqzojRSUVUsIoD9WGpddy_bTvGIDrVCzLE3lG5-dATu8AbJyCjamUyxP3HLVQ5VK9jCIhMMtTBaT2HJfhCU5DyCJrDPfy4Ogu4Em9eTvMpoNJ1c1H1rcQb3Fxdz1sblh4BCD1a1YiB8 CSW8zI39VsO5BAVxD9LaIBLresJM6YZpLF9p4D6QTzKh1lXfKCXWNsk9hoLFO7OhNBb8QC_eO28wfx32Cn68Ezq0hmRrztyOU6kI tjizmujeRjdujQ6KUEVSR_T3RSpTS36hC974g3V7HL1qUwqj1LUSRpNU-SGqJ0cpS7fIopb5xloauBJSPQwKtQWUSBd7D1FaaDnwZ6qvA0tnc=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/3e85da0e1ff4642189bd2b9baa217f9f35b86477975b87d0c4ef8cda90a21ed4.jpg?e=lLz2AgMW87AsxvOJShwLs09nsj1mA 25ZKAGPvBwniSeTlH6GFKshbvvjgI7D_O4tJt5f0bqQH62TR1WNQTnXTtJLAdfNzuCj0eiGKEpF7uP0kT_q97A9tUzL2pzqMXo6S 0fj3OgFKVHNIHSCGhvOGM-T9ufV9lqmEsH7rwkrm2qYY21sq1ajnz2TTT90phm9qg3dJ6hTC9lZdAs3NNkqJgVEFeqqwKewCGGSB3hl2Owk

One detail that the Stanford scientists ignored is the sharp drop in body temperature that occurred in the U.S. when it entered World War I in 1917 and that continued through most of the 1920s. This is consistent with the deployment of immensely powerful low frequency radio stations by the United States in order to reach Navy ships overseas during the war, most of which were dismantled or replaced by lower power shortwave stations by the end of the 1920s.

The role of electricity and radio in causing influenza, including the Spanish influenza of 1918, is also explored in my book: Chapter 7, “Acute Electrical Illness”; Chapter 8, “Mystery on the Isle of Wight”; and Chapter 9, “Earth’s Electric Envelope.”

Cancer is Not a Genetic Disease

Additional evidence that cancer is a metabolic mitochondrial disease has also come to my attention recently. Although modern oncologists are wedded to the idea that cancer is caused by genetic mutations caused by environmental toxins, a rival theory, formulated a century ago by Otto Warburg, holds that cancer is a metabolic disease caused by lack of oxygen, and that carcinogens cause cancer by damaging cellular respiration.

Warburg based his hypothesis on the observation that cancer cells do not require oxygen, and this observation is behind the modern method of diagnosing and staging cancer using positron emission tomography, or PET scanning. Because anaerobic metabolism is inefficient and consumes glucose at a tremendous rate, PET scans can easily find tumors in the body by their more rapid uptake of radioactive glucose.

Now, new research by Thomas Seyfried at Boston College has virtually proven that cancer is not caused by genetic mutations. He reviewed evidence from nuclear transfer experiments done in his own and other laboratories in recent years that prove that it is the mitochondria-containing cytoplasm, and not the DNA-containing nucleus, that determines whether a cell is cancerous or not.

When the nucleus of a cancer cell is combined with the cytoplasm of a normal cell, the resulting fused cell grows normally when implanted into an animal. Conversely, when the nucleus of a normal cell is combined with the cytoplasm of a cancer cell, the fused cell forms a tumor when implanted. It is the mitochondria, and not the DNA, that determines whether a cell is cancerous or not.

“In contrast to the somatic mutation theory,” writes Seyfried, “emerging evidence suggests that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, according to the original theory of Otto Warburg.” Cancer, he says, is caused by lack of oxygen, and DNA mutations are a secondary effect of that lack. “It has been my view,” he writes, “that the plethora of random somatic mutations seen in tumors of almost every kind arise ultimately as downstream effects of insufficient respiration with compensatory fermentation.”

The prevailing, mistaken view of cancer is responsible for the artificial, wrong, and devastating distinction made by scientists, governments, and the World Health Organization between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is energetic enough to knock electrons off of atoms and create ions, and anything that can ionize your DNA is supposed to be able to cause genetic mutations which is supposed to be the cause of cancer. Therefore, according to the prevailing theory, wavelengths much shorter than light waves (high-energy ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays) are dangerous and wavelengths longer than light waves (infrared, radio waves, and power line radiation) are safe, and can be pulsed, modulated and manipulated, and sent all over the planet with impunity.

Seyfried and his colleagues have virtually proven that this is wrong."

Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
June 30, 2021

The last 20 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/newsletters/
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, and French.

onawah

5th July 2021, 20:20

An Invisible Threat: The Possible Link Between Microwave Technology and Health
ENDEVR Documentary
112,109 views
May 30, 2021

"We cannot see the waves, we cannot hear them, we cannot touch them, but they are all around us, invading the air, irradiating our body and the environment. An Invisible Threat looks at the relationship between microwave technology and health, investigating the conflicts of interest among industry representatives, politicians, scientists and consumers that leave us unprotected to the effects of radiation. Wireless networks irradiate microwaves indiscriminately across cities, villages and the countryside of all developed countries. This increasing exposure disturbs the biological processes that are essential for the healthy growth of human beings, animals and plants – it especially affects children and teenagers.
Our investigation delves into three groups: the telecommunications industry (mobile telephone companies, MMF); official organisations (WHO, IARC, ICNIRP) and official scientific reports (BioInitiative, Interphone, CEFALO)."

wCpXMmD3kWs

onawah

5th July 2021, 21:14

The Real Price of your Cell/Mobile Phone
ENDEVR Documentary
177,687 views
Mar 28, 2021
3.1K

"A mobile phone is sold every 57 seconds meaning that there are now more mobile phones on the planet than toothbrushes. We investigated the shameful secrets of the multinationals who produce our mobile phones. They are the big winners of the mobile revolution as their profits explode but what is the human and environmental cost in the production countries of China and the Congo?
We bring exclusive footage from inside Chinese factories where scores of children are working long hours under arduous conditions. The multinationals claim they are doing all they can, but these shocking images say otherwise. In Africa the mines that retrieve minerals essential to components in our smartphones are dangerous and unregulated. Injuries and deaths occur regularly amongst workers just desperate to support their families. Whilst in China the environmental damage has scarred the landscape, emptied a village and possibly caused severe illness among the population.
We confront the major names in the smartphone industry with the realities that they would like to keep hidden."

JxLHXHjpal8

onawah

10th July 2021, 21:33

Microwave Neighborhoods Coming
JULY 7, 2021
Alliance for Natural Health
https://anh-usa.org/microwave-neighborhoods-coming/

(many hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"How a little-known rule could alter your neighborhood and endanger your health.

The federal government has ensured that 5G can come to your neighborhood whether you like it or not. A recent rule change allows the telecoms industry to turn consenting private residences into cell towers, endangering the health of the neighborhood. The only way to fight back is to talk to neighbors who may be considering adding an antenna to their house to inform them of the facts that industry is conveniently leaving out.

Our previous coverage: https://anh-usa.org/your-home-a-cell-tower-dont-let-fcc-do-it/
...provides more background on the OTARD rule, an acronym for “over the air reception device.” Originally, the rule prohibited local municipalities from restricting the installation of satellite dish antennas and other antennas on private residences for reception of TV signals; it didn’t apply to devices that also transmit signals. The FCC recently implemented changes to the rule that allows industry to install wireless transmitting antennas on private homes; and since this would be done on private property, it circumvents the need for companies to meet local zoning and environmental requirements. There is also no requirement to notify neighboring property owners. The OTARD rule has thus been changed from a pro-consumer rule to a pro-industry rule.

Telecom companies are now reportedly going around neighborhoods with deceptive offers like: “Earn $600 – Get paid for doing nothing while helping your community. Be the first person to provide Internet of Things coverage in your neighborhood.”

For some, this may be a tempting offer. Industry may even offer benefits like free internet…but they may also charge you for the electricity used by the antenna. We just don’t know. But it is certain that wireless companies are not telling property owners that they could be held liable if their neighbors experience negative health effects due to the radiation coming from these antennas.

While the telecoms industry has insisted for decades that cell phones, and now 5G networks, are completely safe, there are mountains of evidence to suggest otherwise. We’ve covered a lot of this evidence in previous articles linking EMF radiation to altered metabolism, cancer, cardiovascular disease, DNA damage, impaired sperm function, cognitive impairment, neurological damage, and many more health conditions.

For these reasons, insurers rank 5G EMF radiation as “high risk,” and due to these risks, most insurance plans include an “electromagnetic field exclusion”—that is, insurance plans do not cover injuries related to wireless radiation. Telecoms cannot offer homeowners insurance against liability from the antenna causing physical harm to others because this insurance doesn’t exist.

Unless immediate action is taken, we will be exposed to radiation generated by wireless devices on an unprecedented scale. Especially concerning is that 5G networks that are being rolled out use short millimeter waves, which cannot travel as far as longer waves. This means that more “small cell” towers are needed to create a network, which is why the telecoms industry needs to turn private homes into cell towers. Some neighborhoods would see dozens of small cells installed, all of them emitting microwave radiation. These towers will also emit the lower 4G frequencies, since 5G rollout is still ongoing.

There are particular dangers with 5G networks. We’ve pointed out that Israeli researchers found that our sweat ducts act as antennas for millimeter waves, meaning we would absorb more of this energy into our bodies. Millimeter wavelengths are also used in crowd control systems, making people caught in the high-powered millimeter wave feel like their skin is on fire. No independent research has confirmed the safety of 5G networks.

The US government’s own National Toxicology Program released the results of a $30 million, ten-year project looking into the link between cell phones and cancer. It concluded that “there is clear evidence that male rats exposed to high levels of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones developed cancerous heart tumors.” Again, 5G networks dramatically increase these exposures due to the increased number of “small cells” which will blanket neighborhoods with EMF radiation.

An additional issue is that it’s nearly impossible to effectively sue the wireless companies themselves. A close look at city and municipal contracts shows that it isn’t Verizon, for example, doing business, but a smaller LLC that is created by Verizon to do business in a particular location. This insulates Verizon from being liable for huge amounts in damages. If a lawsuit is successful, you’re raiding the coffers of a “Verizon New York, Inc.” or a smaller company “doing business as” Verizon. ANH is, however, joining Safe Technology Minnesota in submitting an amicus brief in support of Children’s Health Defense’s lawsuit challenging the FCC for adopting the OTARD rule changes.

A better strategy is to engage with neighbors considering telecoms offer of satellite installation and asking questions: are they aware that insurance against health effects from EMF radiation doesn’t exist? If a neighbor, or neighbors’ children, get sick from the radiation emanating from the antenna on their house, can they afford a legal defense? Are they aware of the myriad health dangers associated with EMF radiation? Are they on the hook for the electricity taken up by the antenna? Perhaps proactive action to discuss the issue with neighbors before the industry makes the offer can inoculate neighborhoods from industry propaganda. Friendly but frank conversations about this issue may be the only way to prevent your neighborhood from being blanketed with EMF."

Hughe

19th July 2021, 22:32

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-19-nissan-sued-electromagnetic-radiation-electric-leaf-vehicle.html

(Natural News) A Georgia man has filed a lawsuit against Nissan accusing the automaker of “permanently damaging his health” and “destroying his family and career.”

What did Nissan do, exactly? According to the plaintiff, the company’s “green” LEAF vehicle emitted so much electromagnetic radiation that it caused him to develop lifelong health problems.

The 2015 LEAF has a battery underneath the seat that the plaintiff says is a heavy emitter of low-frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation. Said radiation allegedly caused him to develop uncontrolled eye dilation, chest palpitations, memory loss, difficulty concentrating, and “sporadic hallucinations.”

“Towards the end of January 2017, the plaintiff had a difficult time to distinguish what was real and what was not, and as a result was terminated from his job,” the plaintiff’s lawyer says.

“On January 25th, the plaintiff was hospitalized with inability to hear and speak. Going forward, the plaintiff kept suffering physical and mental symptoms and his marriage fell apart as his wife filed for divorce on April 15th, 2017.”

“Safe” levels of EMF are considered to be 2 mG (milligauss) or less. However, the 2015 Nissan LEAF, according to the lawsuit, emits EMF at the following levels:

• Driver’s floor – up to 9.2 mG, Top of the seat – up to 5.3 mG
• Passenger floor – up to 13.1 mG, Top of the seat – up to 4.9 mG
• Back row floor – up to 31.3 mG, Top of the seat – up to 4.5 mG
• Back row / top of the elevated floor panel at the center of the vehicle – up to 12.6 mG

Is your “green” vehicle killing you?
Prior to purchasing and driving his Nissan LEAF, the plaintiff says he was active and healthy. Everything changed after he started driving his “green” vehicle, which he says left him unable to work because of worsening physical symptoms.

The plaintiff says that working on a computer for more than two hours at a time causes his symptoms to become exponentially more several. It has taken him several years, he says, to “get his life in sort-of order where he can function in a society.”

In January 2017, the plaintiff had to be hospitalized for “chest palpitations” and “facial tingling combined with pressures on his cheeks that felt like the cheeks were about to collapse into his face and breathing difficulties.”

Ever since that time, the plaintiff says he has continued to suffer health setbacks due to chest pains, heart palpitations, low energy, insomnia, ringing in the ears, and facial tingling, all of which he says resulted from exposure to his Nissan LEAF.

In addition to seeking $10 million in damages from the company, the plaintiff also wants Nissan to pay another $990 million for gross negligence in the production of this dangerous vehicle.

With this money, the plaintiff plans to “start a non-profit, public awareness entity to educate people around the world about the dangers of long-term exposure to low-frequency EMF radiation emitted by many unshielded electronic devices such as electric cars, cell phones, microwaves, high voltage powerlines … etc.”

Tesla, by the way, is also producing dangerous vehicles. As we reported, Elon Musk’s “green” vehicles are driving themselves off the road or exploding randomly for no reason, putting people’s lives at risk.

One wonders what the EMF levels are in Teslas, and if they are comparable to those identified in the 2015 Nissan LEAF. Perhaps someone needs to conduct some tests on those cars as well to see if they, too, are killing people with dangerous radiation.

As for the Nissan LEAF case, it was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia: Josef Tater, v. Nissan North America, Inc.

ExomatrixTV

27th July 2021, 22:40

BREAKING NEWS: THE MOST SHOCKING INTERNATIONAL NEWS REPORT! - by Brian Gerard Schaefer (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115813-BREAKING-NEWS-THE-MOST-SHOCKING-INTERNATIONAL-NEWS-REPORT--by-Brian-Gerard-Schaefer)

ExomatrixTV

10th August 2021, 15:29

(Corrupt) ICNIRP dominates expert investigations!

The review of ICNIRP 2020 shows that ICNIRP, WHO, SCENIHR and SSM have consistently rejected available studies that show harmful effects at levels below ICNIRP's values. Studies that show harmful effects have been criticized or ignored, while studies that do not show effects are accepted as evidence that there are no risks despite serious methodological problems with the studies, such as the Danish and British cohorts. Other studies do not claim to show increased cancer risks even though the studies show the opposite (eg Interphone or Cefalo).

It also shows that ICNIRP and IEEE members dominate expert investigations at WHO, the EU and SSM, which means that these other bodies always come to the same conclusion, that ICNIRP's limit values are good and that no risks are shown below them.

In 2018, researchers and organizations active in the field requested that ICNIRP be replaced by an independent organization. ICNIRP is not as independent of the industry as it claims to be. Its assessments are not objective and do not reflect the state of scientific knowledge. They are angled in favor of industry.

Furthermore, the EU report that examined ICNIRP in 2020 concluded that ICNIRP cannot be relied on for impartial scientific assessment.

ICNIRP's opposition to the extensive and growing scientific evidence for health risks is detrimental to public health and leads to suffering and premature death that could have been avoided, Hardell and the others state in their review.

ICNIRP's conclusion that no effects on cancer development could be substantiated is not true and is contradicted by scientific results. Extensive and convincing evidence for increased risk of cancer is available today. ICNIRP values allow harmful exposure.

In the interest of public health, ICNIRP's reference values must be replaced with values that truly protect against health effects and have been developed by researchers who are independent of industry.

Source: “ Aspects o n t he International Commission o n Non - Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2020 Guidelines o n Radiofrequency Radiation”

source (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se%2F2021%2F06%2F02%2Ficnirp-dominerar-expertutredningar%2F)

ExomatrixTV

10th August 2021, 15:34

India: Abnormally many deaths in several villages are reported to be caused by 5G

From several villages in India, there are reports of abnormally high deaths after 5G was launched. In one village it is stated that 32 people have died in a short time and in another 65. The villagers say that there is a temporal connection between the start of 5G and the deaths.
In the village of Jaffrabad, 32 people died within 20 days after the 5G master was launched. Most were between 40 and 50 years old and they should not have had any previous illness.

In the village of Titoli, 65 people are said to have died shortly after 5G was started in early May. But since the power to the mast was turned off, the deaths have ceased, according to a spokesman.

Several deaths have occurred very quickly and the victims must have had a fever, heart attack or chest pain.
Watch videos here (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&ajax=1&elem=1&se=1&u=https://radiationdangers.com/2021/06/06/india-5g-towers-kill-32-villagers-in-20-days/) and here (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&ajax=1&elem=1&se=1&u=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DY1waUTHVgS0) !!

More than 400 scientists and doctors have called for 5G to be stopped

Since the 5G Appeal (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/5g-appeal-varnar-for-allvarliga-halsokonsekvenser-av-5g/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) was launched in 2017, more than 400 scientists and doctors have called for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G due to serious potential health consequences. 5G leads to a massive increase in forced microwave radiation and there is a complete lack of research showing that 5G can be expanded without seriously damaging human health and the environment.

Microwave radiation has already been proven to be hazardous to health below the reference values for permitted radiation recommended by the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority. Among other things, extensive research (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2020/10/01/vaxande-bevis-mikrovagsstralning-orsakar-oxidativ-stress-dna-skador-och-skadliga-effekter-pa-hjarnan/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) shows that radiation damages cells' DNA, causes oxidative stress, harmful effects on the brain, microwave syndrome (difficulty sleeping, headaches, heart effects, stress, dizziness, tinnitus and more). Prolonged exposure increases the risk of cancer, degenerative diseases and reproductive effects.

A 1970s (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/US-_apport_1976_defense_intelligence_agency.pdf?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) US government report (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/US-_apport_1976_defense_intelligence_agency.pdf?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) describes that certain combinations of frequencies can lead to immediate death by heart attack:
" Animal experiments reported in the open literature have demonstrated the use of low-level microwave signals to produce death by heart seizure"

Research on effects is completely lacking

There is no research at all (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2021/06/02/icnirp-dominerar-expertutredningar/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) that shows that it is possible to fully expose people to 5G radiation from base stations without harming human health at the permitted levels, ie up to 10,000,000 microW / m2 on average over 6 minutes. There is not even research that shows it for 4G or 3G or 2G, individually or in combination - that is, real exposure. In reality, people are exposed to a combination of 5G, 4G, 3G and in many cases even WiFi.

There is not even research that shows that it does not pose health hazards at levels that are 1000 times lower than the authorities' so-called reference value, which indicates permitted radiation.

Anecdotal testimonies important

As there is a complete lack of research on the effects of exposure to 5G radiation from base stations, it is important to consider early anecdotal reports such as these from India, as well as those reported by the Radiation Protection Foundation from Sweden in 2020. People in Sweden increasingly testified to (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2020/04/10/manga-sjuka-pga-den-okande-stralningen-fran-mobilbasstationerna/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) respiratory problems, pressure over the chest, heart problems, tinnitus, feeling of fever, severe headache in connection with the expansion of 5G in Sweden. At the same time, we were able to establish with measurements that the radiation increased massively (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2020/04/23/mycket-hog-stralning-i-bostader-manniskor-har-svara-symtom/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) , just as 5G Appeal warned against. For 50 years, all symptoms have been (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2020/12/03/skadliga-effekter-kanda-1969-fornekas-an-i-dag/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) described as an effect of pulsed microwave radiation, but the connection is still denied by the responsible authorities.

No follow-up is made at all by the authorities and the government regarding the health consequences of the expansion of 5G, despite the fact that there is thus no research at all on the effects of 5G or the combination of 5G, 4G and 3G that people are actually exposed to. The many reports of serious health problems submitted to the authorities are left without action with reference to the fact that the radiation is below the current reference value - despite the reference value (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/gransvarden/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) completely lacking protection against the effects of long-term exposure (more than 30 minutes) and the witnessed health problems.

In December 2020, the National Academies of Sciences (https://www-stralskyddsstiftelsen-se.translate.goog/2020/12/09/regeringsrapport-huvudvark-somnproblem-yrsel-tinnitus-orsakades-av-mikrovagsstralning/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=ajax,elem) (NAS) stated that pulsed microwave radiation had caused a large number of illnesses among embassy staff. Like the Radiation Protection Foundation, the report from NAS states that the symptoms that the diplomats suffered have been described for a long time as an effect of microwave radiation:
"Studies published in the open literature more than half a century ago and over the following decades by Western and Soviet sources provide circumstantial support for this possible mechanism."

source (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se%2F2021%2F06%2F29%2Findien-onormalt-manga-dodsfall-i-flera-byar-uppges-vara-orsakade-av-5g%2F)

Eva2

12th August 2021, 22:51

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/6G-Closer-than-you-think.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1BfGtIua5whuSM5OcghyJm-6WqcusazcIdPl6rNJY2rz9mVVG3SAU3rXY

(I've copied and pasted this but its probably easier to read on the initial link at the top)

6G
All over the world, scientists, governments, corporations and consumers are collaborating to turn the Earth into a giant computer, fulfilling the warning predictions of the great Swedish physicist and Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén. Written under the pen name Olof Johannesson, his 1966 science fiction novel Sagan om den stora datamaskinen (The Tale of the Great Computer) predicted smart phones, the internet, fitbits, artificial intelligence, chip implants enabling direct human-to- computer communication, the colonization of Mars, and ultimately the replacement of humankind entirely by computers, which regarded human beings as just one step on the evolutionary path to themselves.
Some of the national and international groups already working toward 6G are:
 6G Flagship, a Finnish research and development program funded by the University of Oulu and the Academy of Finland.
 URLLC (Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communications) is a collaboration between the University of Oulu and South Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI).
 TEMA (Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association of India), in association with CMAI (Cellular Mobile Association of India), have formed the 6G Council.

 CEA-LETI. This is the Laboratoire d'électronique des technologies de l'information (LETI), a subsidiary of the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives(CEA), France's nuclear and renewable energy commission. LETI employs 1,900 people and is headquartered in Grenoble. Its 6G program is called New-6G.
 6GIC (6G Innovation Centre), a project of the University of Surrey, in the UK.
 InterDigital, a technology research and development company with offices in
the US, Canada, Belgium, England and France.
 6GWorld, a subsidiary of InterDigital.
 ATIS, the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions, which has 150 member companies. ATIS issued a press release on October 13, 2020 proclaiming, “ATIS Launches Next G Alliance to Advance North American Leadership in 6G.”
 5G-ACIA, the 5G Alliance for Connected Industries and Automation. This is a working group of Zentralverband Elektrotechnik- und Elektronikindustrie e.V. (ZVEI), the German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers Association.,
 5G IA (5G Infrastructure Association), the “Voice of European Industry for the development and evolution of 5G.” In the 5G PPP (5G public private partnership), 5G IA represents the private side and the European Commission the public side. 5G IA is Headquartered in Brussels, Belgium.
 6G@UT, a new research center launched on July 7, 2021 by the University of Texas at Austin and funded by InterDigital, AT&T, Qualcomm, Samsung, and NVIDIA.
6G will use frequencies from 40 GHz to 330 GHz, called “sub-terahertz” frequencies, in order to support “extreme data rates up to 1 Tbps.” The signal bandwidth will be in tens of GHz to “over 100 GHz.” Among other things, 6G will enable autonomous drones, cars, forklifts, trains, excavators and harvesters.
The first European 6G Symposium, a virtual event with 72 speakers, took place May 4-6, 2021. It was organized jointly by 6GWorld, 6GIC, Interdigital, and 6G Flagship. It featured Andreas Mueller, chairman of ACIA; Colin Willcock, chairman of 5G-IA; BK
2

Syngal, chairman of the 6G Council of TEMA/CMAI; Emilio Calvanese Strinati, program director of New-6G, CEA-LETI; DongKu Kim, professor at Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea and co-chair of the 6G R&D Strategy Committee of the university.
The 2021 Joint EuCNC & 6G Summit took place June 8-11, 2021. EuCNC is the European Conference on Networks and Communications. This event was a joint program of 6G Flagship and the European Commission. It was a virtual conference based in Porto, Portugal.
On July 13, 2021, at an event called Asia Tech x Singapore, 6G Flagship announced a partnership with the country of Singapore. The Singapore part of the collaboration will be housed at the Singapore University of Technology and Design.
Another 6G Summit will take place on August 31, 2021 at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado. There will be speakers from Verizon, AT&T, US Cellular, Rogers Communications, T-Mobile, Northeastern University, the Next G Alliance, the National Science Foundation, Virginia Tech and others. The physical event will be followed by a virtual event on September 2, 2021. This 6G Summit is sponsored by the Big 5G Event in collaboration with the Next G Alliance and ATIS.
The IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), a virtual conference sponsored by 6G Flagship, will take place September 13-16, 2021.
A 6G Symposium will take place Sept. 21-22, 2021 in Washington DC at Halcyon House. There will be 50 speakers from industry, universities and governments. It is sponsored by 6GWorld in partnership with InterDigital; the Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things at Northeastern University; and the Next G Alliance.
On September 23, 2021, also at Halcyon House in Washington, the U.S. Department of Defense will hold a symposium called 5G to XG US Defense Symposium. It will feature former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell as well as speakers from InterDigital, Lockheed Martin, Space Economy Rising, the IEEE, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Spectrum Consortium, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and the Department of Defense.
And the Brooklyn 6G Summit, titled “Dawn of 6G” and hosted by the Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, will be held virtually on October 18-19, 2021. It will feature speakers from the U.S., Japan, Europe and China.
3

The third issue of 6G Waves magazine was published in Spring 2021. In it, we read that “the role of 5G/6G is to cognitively connect every feasible device, process, and human to a global information grid.” Its articles paint a picture of a nightmare world into which scientists and engineers are leading us:
 The Hexa-X project promises “seamless unification of the physical, digital and human worlds... Whereas 5G is significantly enhancing our ability to consume digital media anywhere, anytime, 6G should enable us to embed ourselves in entire virtual or digital worlds.” This article talks about “massive twinning,” “telepresence,” “cobots,” “the internet-of-senses,” and “ubiquitous autonomous systems closely interleaved in every aspect of our lives.”
“Massive twinning” is “the creation of a digital twin from humans, physical objects, and processes.”
“Telepresence” will allow people to “interact with, or experience the physical world remotely with lifelike fidelity.”
“Cobots” will be “collaborative robots” in homes and public spaces.
 Another article discusses a “tactile internet” enabling “humans wearing wearables and interacting with virtual spaces implemented in the network, where the users feel as if they were present in a real place of interest directly interacting with its surroundings.” It envisions “face-to-face (F2F) conferences where remote attendees feel as if they were in a conference room where they can look at any direction. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the demand for such applications.”
 Another article reviews the development of “extremely fine smart dust” -- wireless devices that are so small they are the size of tiny particles.
 Dr. Ian Oppermann, a government scientist and professor at the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia, thinks 6G is necessary, and that there is “no alternative path for us, if we are to survive as a species.” His only concerns are that we protect people’s data and privacy. He imagines “a smart home, where the lights turn on and off as you move from room to room, where the heating is controlled intelligently by the number of people at home.” He envisions “a smart toilet that analyzes your urine chemistry and gives you
4

recommendations for what to eat, based on your phosphate levels. Maybe that information gets shared with your fridge and it suggests you should eat more bananas.” “Another convenient piece of technology might be a drone hovering above your home, providing you with an ad hoc mobile network (great), but in addition the drone can record your location (dubious, but OK) and perhaps measure your body temperature (definitely not OK). The obvious question is, do you consent to all of this?”
And on August 5, 2021, the Federal Communications Commission created new “Innovation Zones” in Raleigh, North Carolina and Boston, Massachusetts and expanded its existing Innovation Zone in New York City. These are programs of the Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research (PAWR), which is funded by the National Science Foundation and a consortium of over 30 technology and telecommunications companies.
The Northeastern Innovation Zone will be operated jointly by Northeastern University and DARPA. It will cover 0.8 square miles at Northeastern’s main campus in Boston, bordering Carter Playground to the east, Columbus Avenue to the south, and Huntington Avenue to the north; and 0.9 square miles at its satellite campus in Burlington, bordering Mary Cummings Park. These facilities will expose everyone in these test areas to frequencies ranging from 746 MHz all the way up to 1.05 THz (1,050 GHz).
The expanded New York City Innovation Zone, known as COSMOS, will be run jointly by Columbia University, Rutgers University, New York University, and City College of New York, and will cover portions of Columbia University, City College, nearby streets, and parts of Riverside and Morningside Parks. Other partners include Silicon Harlem, the University of Arizona and IBM. The New York City testbed will focus on developing ultra-high bandwidth, low latency wireless communications. It will use frequencies from 2500 MHz to 40 GHz.
The Raleigh Innovation Zone will be split into two areas. One will cover 10.5 square miles, including the North Carolina State University campus, a suburban residential area, and the Lake Wheeler Agricultural Research Station. This zone will house the Aerial Experimentation and Research Platform for Advanced Wireless (AERPAW), which will focus on developing wireless communications from unmanned drones. An additional 3 square miles, covering a different portion of the university campus and extending into the Town of Cary, will host four fixed towers with wireless transceivers. The Raleigh testbed will be operated by North Carolina State University
5

in partnership with Wireless Research Center of North Carolina, Mississippi State University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Town of Cary, the City of Raleigh, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Purdue University, and the University of South Carolina. This testbed will use frequencies from 617 MHz to 40 GHz.
Another Innovation Zone, which was established by the FCC in September 2019, is located in Salt Lake City, Utah. It covers 4 square miles consisting of a portion of the University of Utah campus, a downtown area and a corridor connecting the two. This testbed is a joint project of the University of Utah, Rice University and Salt Lake City. The frequencies used in this testbed range from 698 MHz to 7125 MHz. All of the Innovation Zones are managed by the National Science Foundation’s Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research (PAWR) program.
And on June 22, 2021, PAWR announced the establishment of yet another large testbed, based at Iowa State University in central Iowa. This testbed will be spread across Iowa State University, the City of Ames, and surrounding farms and rural communities. Funded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, it “will create a multi-modal, high-capacity wireless mesh network including low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite links, a free-space optical (FSOC) platform, and long-distance millimeter wave (mmWave) and microwave point-to-point communications.”
______________________
In 1862 Henry Brooks Adams, grandson of the sixth American president, wrote, “I firmly believe that before many centuries more, science will be the master of man. The engines he will have invented will be beyond his strength to control. Some day science may have the existence of mankind in its power, and the human race commit suicide by blowing up the world.”
The nightmares of sages past are coming true at a dizzying pace. Do we have the ability to face them, and the courage to plot a different course? To stop blaming one another, and realize that no one is in charge. To stop fighting fire with fire, to let the flames of technology die out so that the dormant seeds of nature may reemerge through its cinders to rebeautify the world, before it is too late.
Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life P.O. Box 6216
6

Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129 arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org August 12, 2021
The last 23 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian and French.
To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce/subscribe

onawah

13th August 2021, 04:58

Here it is in a somewhat more legible form, from Firstenberg's email newsletter:

6G - Closer than you think
https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tQtAsAG1SQpwTeUSXwq6SVXKDWj-pLy1aRRuSjv2WYYdVbbJZAvZevkb4sY6d16i7YDyPZrKOVgvkoXVGMlqtyR6BXM3KVY8zSSA9WuHL4xINntryT86fy7Zy2JhL_nW q1IJsiX0grPtKTR6DEqJAXsGevdx5Uz11i3hKK2HOCDBqbM3YYvdc7ZrIbCTSLQ6rk2u6w9MF2ODn2b0gVT6fyg1n45QqwWlwA2-zG5i3BN7SEZ6U9XgSn9ucwB9umcqRdjm1n2f2qJjb45dAaFmgYg--H1VUghYMctB2em1wKOhG7FqKf7etVy9zSXhz_9EkTLca5RkoyZz31doD-ReLIwEKbFTX0d2eajytBOsYirdQVoKAASTprOUe4xAID_6adIO7jLzwUW1Bche4c8J7IpRyaHWN8dv_jCIOAysCUGAwT27YxdJQa Teuk6-aqfy6jj2zDeTwulpidLyh44Nk1IVpPTdnNVl_M5Xi1eAFMxvtPMSImcTOO3D=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=ODB068oAJjbDgIRupY3-OMdhCXnxdjA0z3WZe1FPE0l9oZ2f85BY5AtriTt5nCxhpVgJQvu50608UP8FN9IqH0KOVkjeneUiQ8UtlJQfr-LDHq4ajEDOGrkEmjkP8TE1vPTva5junGX6HjCgehIzPJRPpf8n5Q9UsufU5fcyhATOtummCTsOYw9D77IWK5L_EJ59QS8JojrtPY YFbQiZHIRLsK9pYCxGa3Gh9QD0fSMu
"All over the world, scientists, governments, corporations and consumers are collaborating to turn the Earth into a giant computer, fulfilling the warning predictions of the great Swedish physicist and Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén. Written under the pen name Olof Johannesson, his 1966 science fiction novel Sagan om den stora datamaskinen (The Tale of the Great Computer) predicted smart phones, the internet, fitbits, artificial intelligence, chip implants enabling direct human-to-computer communication, the colonization of Mars, and ultimately the replacement of humankind entirely by computers, which regarded human beings as just one step on the evolutionary path to themselves.

Some of the national and international groups already working toward 6G are:

6G Flagship, a Finnish research and development program funded by the University of Oulu and the Academy of Finland.

URLLC (Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communications) is a collaboration between the University of Oulu and South Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI).

TEMA (Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association of India), in association with CMAI (Cellular Mobile Association of India), have formed the 6G Council.

CEA-LETI. This is the Laboratoire d'électronique des technologies de l'information (LETI), a subsidiary of the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), France's nuclear and renewable energy commission. LETI employs 1,900 people and is headquartered in Grenoble. Its 6G program is called New-6G.

6GIC (6G Innovation Centre), a project of the University of Surrey, in the UK.

InterDigital, a technology research and development company with offices in the US, Canada, Belgium, England and France.

6GWorld, a subsidiary of InterDigital.

ATIS, the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions, which has 150 member companies. ATIS issued a press release on October 13, 2020 proclaiming, “ATIS Launches Next G Alliance to Advance North American Leadership in 6G.”

5G-ACIA, the 5G Alliance for Connected Industries and Automation. This is a working group of Zentralverband Elektrotechnik- und Elektronikindustrie e.V. (ZVEI), the German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers Association.

5G IA (5G Infrastructure Association), the “Voice of European Industry for the development and evolution of 5G.” In the 5G PPP (5G public private partnership), 5G IA represents the private side and the European Commission the public side. 5G IA is headquartered in Brussels, Belgium.

6G@UT, a new research center launched on July 7, 2021 by the University of Texas at Austin and funded by InterDigital, AT&T, Qualcomm, Samsung, and NVIDIA.

6G will use frequencies from 40 GHz to 330 GHz, called “sub-terahertz” frequencies, in order to support “extreme data rates up to 1 Tbps.” The signal bandwidth will be in tens of GHz to “over 100 GHz.” Among other things, 6G will enable autonomous drones, cars, forklifts, trains, excavators and harvesters.

The first European 6G Symposium, a virtual event with 72 speakers, took place May 4-6, 2021. It was organized jointly by 6GWorld, 6GIC, Interdigital, and 6G Flagship. It featured Andreas Mueller, chairman of ACIA; Colin Willcock, chairman of 5G-IA; BK Syngal, chairman of the 6G Council of TEMA/CMAI; Emilio Calvanese Strinati, program director of New-6G, CEA-LETI; DongKu Kim, professor at Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea and co-chair of the 6G R&D Strategy Committee of the university.

The 2021 Joint EuCNC & 6G Summit took place June 8-11, 2021. EuCNC is the European Conference on Networks and Communications. This event was a joint program of 6G Flagship and the European Commission. It was a virtual conference based in Porto, Portugal.

On July 13, 2021, at an event called Asia Tech x Singapore, 6G Flagship announced a partnership with the country of Singapore. The Singapore part of the collaboration will be housed at the Singapore University of Technology and Design.

Another 6G Summit will take place on August 31, 2021 at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado. There will be speakers from Verizon, AT&T, US Cellular, Rogers Communications, T-Mobile, Northeastern University, the Next G Alliance, the National Science Foundation, Virginia Tech and others. The physical event will be followed by a virtual event on September 2, 2021. This 6G Summit is sponsored by the Big 5G Event in collaboration with the Next G Alliance and ATIS.

The IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), a virtual conference sponsored by 6G Flagship, will take place September 13-16, 2021.

A 6G Symposium will take place Sept. 21-22, 2021 in Washington DC at Halcyon House. There will be 50 speakers from industry, universities and governments. It is sponsored by 6GWorld in partnership with InterDigital; the Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things at Northeastern University; and the Next G Alliance.

On September 23, 2021, also at Halcyon House in Washington, the U.S. Department of Defense will hold a symposium called 5G to XG US Defense Symposium. It will feature former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell as well as speakers from InterDigital, Lockheed Martin, Space Economy Rising, the IEEE, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Spectrum Consortium, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and the Department of Defense.

And the Brooklyn 6G Summit, titled “Dawn of 6G” and hosted by the Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, will be held virtually on October 18-19, 2021. It will feature speakers from the U.S., Japan, Europe and China.

The third issue of 6G Waves magazine was published in Spring 2021. In it, we read that “the role of 5G/6G is to cognitively connect every feasible device, process, and human to a global information grid.” Its articles paint a picture of a nightmare world into which scientists and engineers are leading us:

The Hexa-X project promises “seamless unification of the physical, digital and human worlds... Whereas 5G is significantly enhancing our ability to consume digital media anywhere, anytime, 6G should enable us to embed ourselves in entire virtual or digital worlds.” This article talks about “massive twinning,” “telepresence,” “cobots,” “the internet-of-senses,” and “ubiquitous autonomous systems closely interleaved in every aspect of our lives.”

“Massive twinning” is “the creation of a digital twin from humans, physical objects, and processes.”

“Telepresence” will allow people to “interact with, or experience the physical world remotely with lifelike fidelity.”

“Cobots” will be “collaborative robots” in homes and public spaces.

Another article discusses a “tactile internet” enabling “humans wearing wearables and interacting with virtual spaces implemented in the network, where the users feel as if they were present in a real place of interest directly interacting with its surroundings.” It envisions “face-to-face (F2F) conferences where remote attendees feel as if they were in a conference room where they can look at any direction. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the demand for such applications.”

Another article reviews the development of “extremely fine smart dust” -- wireless devices that are so small they are the size of tiny particles.

Dr. Ian Oppermann, a government scientist and professor at the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia, thinks 6G is necessary, and that there is “no alternative path for us, if we are to survive as a species.” His only concerns are that we protect people’s data and privacy. He imagines “a smart home, where the lights turn on and off as you move from room to room, where the heating is controlled intelligently by the number of people at home.” He envisions “a smart toilet that analyzes your urine chemistry and gives you recommendations for what to eat, based on your phosphate levels. Maybe that information gets shared with your fridge and it suggests you should eat more bananas.” “Another convenient piece of technology might be a drone hovering above your home, providing you with an ad hoc mobile network (great), but in addition the drone can record your location (dubious, but OK) and perhaps measure your body temperature (definitely not OK). The obvious question is, do you consent to all of this?”

And on August 5, 2021, the Federal Communications Commission created new “Innovation Zones” in Raleigh, North Carolina and Boston, Massachusetts and expanded its existing Innovation Zone in New York City. These are programs of the Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research (PAWR), which is funded by the National Science Foundation and a consortium of over 30 technology and telecommunications companies.

The Northeastern Innovation Zone will be operated jointly by Northeastern University and DARPA. It will cover 0.8 square miles at Northeastern’s main campus in Boston, bordering Carter Playground to the east, Columbus Avenue to the south, and Huntington Avenue to the north; and 0.9 square miles at its satellite campus in Burlington, bordering Mary Cummings Park. These facilities will expose everyone in these test areas to frequencies ranging from 746 MHz all the way up to 1.05 THz (1,050 GHz).

The expanded New York City Innovation Zone, known as COSMOS, will be run jointly by Columbia University, Rutgers University, New York University, and City College of New York, and will cover portions of Columbia University, City College, nearby streets, and parts of Riverside and Morningside Parks. Other partners include Silicon Harlem, the University of Arizona and IBM. The New York City testbed will focus on developing ultra-high bandwidth, low latency wireless communications. It will use frequencies from 2500 MHz to 40 GHz.

The Raleigh Innovation Zone will be split into two areas. One will cover 10.5 square miles, including the North Carolina State University campus, a suburban residential area, and the Lake Wheeler Agricultural Research Station. This zone will house the Aerial Experimentation and Research Platform for Advanced Wireless (AERPAW), which will focus on developing wireless communications from unmanned drones. An additional 3 square miles, covering a different portion of the university campus and extending into the Town of Cary, will host four fixed towers with wireless transceivers. The Raleigh testbed will be operated by North Carolina State University in partnership with Wireless Research Center of North Carolina, Mississippi State University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Town of Cary, the City of Raleigh, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Purdue University, and the University of South Carolina. This testbed will use frequencies from 617 MHz to 40 GHz.

Another Innovation Zone, which was established by the FCC in September 2019, is located in Salt Lake City, Utah. It covers 4 square miles consisting of a portion of the University of Utah campus, a downtown area and a corridor connecting the two. This testbed is a joint project of the University of Utah, Rice University and Salt Lake City. The frequencies used in this testbed range from 698 MHz to 7125 MHz. All of the Innovation Zones are managed by the National Science Foundation’s Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research (PAWR) program.

And on June 22, 2021, PAWR announced the establishment of yet another large testbed, based at Iowa State University in central Iowa. This testbed will be spread across Iowa State University, the City of Ames, and surrounding farms and rural communities. Funded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, it “will create a multi-modal, high-capacity wireless mesh network including low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite links, a free-space optical (FSOC) platform, and long-distance millimeter wave (mmWave) and microwave point-to-point communications.”
______________________

In 1862 Henry Brooks Adams, grandson of the sixth American president, wrote, “I firmly believe that before many centuries more, science will be the master of man. The engines he will have invented will be beyond his strength to control. Some day science may have the existence of mankind in its power, and the human race commit suicide by blowing up the world.”

The nightmares of sages past are coming true at a dizzying pace. Do we have the ability to face them, and the courage to plot a different course? To stop blaming one another, and realize that no one is in charge. To stop fighting fire with fire, to let the flames of technology die out so that the dormant seeds of nature may reemerge through its cinders to rebeautify the world, before it is too late.

Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
August 12, 2021

The last 23 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, and French.

To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce/subscribe or click on this link:https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe/ "

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/6G-Closer-than-you-think.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1BfGtIua5whuSM5OcghyJm-6WqcusazcIdPl6rNJY2rz9mVVG3SAU3rXY

(I've copied and pasted this but its probably easier to read on the initial link at the top)

6G
]

ExomatrixTV

13th August 2021, 23:27

1426321427813257222
source (https://twitter.com/saferphones/status/1426321427813257222)
1426323606469021698
source (https://twitter.com/Stop5G/status/1426323606469021698)

¤=[Post Update]=¤

🤔 Did we ever had a real "balanced" #5G vs #Stop5G report in Mainstream Media? ... Still no real (unedited) MSM debate allowed, why? ... Even if 5G will impact all of humanity and all biological life forms forever!

⚠️ ICNIRP and/or W.H.O. and/or FCC discussed in any Pro 5G video or MSM articles? 🌐 Always share these 59 Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) links

01. DrMartinPall-vs-ICNIRP (https://web.archive.org/web/20210813233012/http://whynotnews.eu/pdf/5G-Risks-The-Scientific-Perspective-Science2Stop5G.pdf) (PDF)
02. WHO-5G-EMFs-CoverUp (https://www.emfoff.com/cover-up/)
03. MSM-Bias-Fact-Check-5G (https://web.archive.org/web/20221005044245/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/why-does-msm-like-bbc-metro-wired-feel-the-need-to-misrepresent-stop5g-activists/)
04. Stop5G-vs-ICNIRP-Corruption (https://web.archive.org/web/20211124112308/http://whynotnews.eu/5G-Mass-Experiment-ICNIRP-Cartel-Corruption-Europe.pdf)
05. ICNIRP-Corruption-Dossier-01 (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/icnirpcorruption)
06. MSM-ICNIRP-Deceptive-Content (https://web.archive.org/web/20210623114759/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/msm-pushes-bogus-radiation-watchdog-icnirp-2020-safety-guidelines-not-safety-standards-backed-by-evidence/)
07. FCC A Captured Agency (https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/harvard-press-book-telecom-industry-influence-us-fcc-captured-agency/)
08. Scientific-American-5G-Warning (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/)
09. 5G-Warning-by-IEEE (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190250/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/5g-warning-by-institute-of-electrical-electronics-engineers/)
10. 5G-EU-Science-Appeal (https://www.jrseco.com/european-union-5g-appeal-scientists-warn-of-potential-serious-health-effects-of-5g/)
11. 2020-Science2Stop5G (https://web.archive.org/web/20211124111936/http://whynotnews.eu/pdf/2020-Academic-Science2Stop5G-Paper-Extreme-Danger-of-5G.pdf) (PDF)
12. Science2Stop5G-2020 (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/902581193510370/)
13. 5GviolatesNurembergCode (https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/62452/LARGEST_UNETHICAL_MEDICAL_EXPERIMENT_FINAL.pdf) (PDF)
14. WHO-and-5G-Corporatism (https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046)
15. Stop5G-Scientists-and-Doctors (https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/05/15/scientists-doctors-make-it-quite-clear-that-5g-could-pose-a-risk-to-human-health/)
16. Gov-Ignore-Own-EMF-Evidence (https://web.archive.org/web/20210325083454/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/government-ignoring-its-own-wireless-radiation-risks-evidence/)
17. ICNIRP-5G-Safety-Deceptions-II (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190348/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/exposing-icnirp-5g-safety-deceptions-part-ii/)
18. Stop5G-CHD-vs-FCC (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190232/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/chd-gives-notice-to-fcc-against-5g-cell-towers/)
19. Smartphone-Radiation-Law (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190403/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/smartphone-radiation-lawfully-reduced-restricted-in-belgium-march-2020/)
20. Legitimate-5G-Concerns (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190331/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/questions-about-negative-5g-effects-are-legitimate-says-minister-rudi-medved/)
21. 5G-Health-Risks-Warning (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190258/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/dutch-surgeon-oncologist-warns-of-long-term-5g-radiation-risks/)
22. 5G-Russian-Roulette (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190306/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/5g-russian-roulette-with-our-health/)
23. Top100-Science2Stop5G-Videos (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190346/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/doctors-scientists/)
24. Stop5G-Disband-ICNIRP (https://microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house)
25. NEPA-vs-FCC-Stop5G (https://mdsafetech.org/2019/12/08/nepa-the-nrdc-and-5g-neighborhood-cell-towers/)
26. 5G-Can-Damage-Eyes-Skin (https://web.archive.org/web/20220705063407/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/study-commissioned-by-parliament-austria-5g-can-damage-eyes-skin/)
27. Sub-TerraHerz-5G-Dangers (https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/is-5g-safe/)
28. 5G-1st-Safety-2nd-FCC-Policy (https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/putting-the-cart-before-the-horse-the-fccs-5g-first-safety-second-policy/)
29. Green-Party-and-5G (https://www.5gexposed.com/2019/05/28/proposal-for-a-5g-moratorium-motion-green-party/)
30. Non-Ionizing-Radiation-Lie (https://reject5g.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Big-Telecoms-Big-Non-Ionizing-Lie6.pdf) (PDF)
31. EU-Greens-vs-ICNIRP (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-JUNE-2020.pdf) (PDF)
32. Devra-Davis-PhD-Science2Stop5G (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-JUNE-2020.pdf) (PDF)
33. ICNIRP-Conflict-of-Interest (https://web.archive.org/web/20211124112300/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/ICNIRP-Conflict-of-Interest-in-Bioelectromagnetics.pdf) (PDF)
34. ICNIRP-SCAM (https://www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/the-scientists-and-the-organisations#conflict-of-interest)
35. ICNIRP-Serves-5G-Industry (https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/2020/5g-covid-conspiracy/)
36. 5G-Massive-Health-Experiment (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5784487/The-roll-5G-wireless-service-massive-health-experiment-public-health-expert-warns-a.html)
37. FCC-5G-Lawsuit (https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Our-Legal-Actions-Update--My-Cong--Voting-Results--Armenian-USSR-TV-Covers-5G.html)
38. 400-MDs-Against-FCC-5G-Plans (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190406/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/400-medical-professionals-against-fcc-plans-for-expanded-wireless-5g-june-2020/)
39. 5G-in-5-minutes (https://www.bitchute.com/video/coy4VhCvjixi/)
40. Stop5G-Victories (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190310/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/uncategorized/multiple-cities-successfully-stopping-or-banning-5g-worldwide/)
41. Stop5G-Brainstorm (https://web.archive.org/web/20220901190341/https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-cancer/%E2%9A%A0%EF%B8%8F-top-20-most-powerful-stop5g-brainstorm-points/)
42. ICNIRP-Needs-Your-Ignorance (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/961926904242465/)
43. FCC-Ignores-SAR-Children (https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/fcc-limit/)
44. EMFs-and-Wildlife-Stop5G (https://www.emfresearch.com/emf-wildlife/)
45. Specs-Beamforming-5G-Towers (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/962454057523083/)
46. Stop5G-MSM-Straw-Man-Fallacy (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/963994264035729/)
47. Quantum-Fractal-Antennas-vs-5G (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111429-Intermediary-effect-and-function-of-Fractal-Antennas-to-Quantum-World)
48. NewNormal-was-all-Planned (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/967208497047639/)
49. Corrupt-Perception-Management (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/963975014037654/)
50. Science2Stop5G-Papers (https://web.archive.org/web/20211124112118/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/July-2020-Science2Stop5G-Papers.pdf) (PDF)
51. Non-Ionizing-Lie-Explained (https://web.archive.org/web/20211124112118/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/July-2020-Science2Stop5G-Papers.pdf) (PDF)
52. Science2Stop5G-Legal-Action (https://web.archive.org/web/20210813233026/http://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/pdf/Science2Stop5G-Danish-Legal-Action-Jensen-2019.pdf) (PDF)
53. 17-Legit-5G-Questions (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/988903244878164/)
54. EU-5G-PDF-File-2020 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf) (PDF)
55. Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-)
56. Bogus-5G-is-Virus-Exposed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/998867930548362/)
57. WhatTheyDoNotWantYouToSee (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/permalink/1001874936914328/)
58. Telecoms Are Losing the 5G Battles (https://scientists4wiredtech.com/telecoms-losing-the-densified-4g-5g-battle/)
59. 2021 European Parliament (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf)#5G (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf) Health Impact Studies (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf) (PDF)

🤔 99,9% chance they (MSM) can NOT summarize above 59 links ... because their minds are already made up! ... 1000s of mainstream publications are UNBALANCED ... and the moment they decide to make it "balanced" and allow better more "honest" representation of those who are against #5G they are MOST LIKELY able to spin it and to manipulate it in such a way you have the illusion it was "balanced" but we know better as I stated: they can not even make an honest representation / summary of above 59 links! >>> They are corporate pushed Perception Managers!

🌐 If you repeat the corporate pushed narratives over and over and over and over ... that means it takes almost NO EFFORT to explain THEIR views later on ... as most sheeple were already mass conditioned 24/7 why "5G is okay" ... but when you NEVER made an honest summary of above 59 links it is much, much harder for the masses to fully comprehend what really is going on ...

🌐 So the moment an alleged (assumed) "balanced" report appears, THEY have already had the time to mass brainwash 1000s of times before the "balanced" report even started. That is why I call it the illusion of "free (mainstream) press" or "free (mainstream) media" totally rigged by corporate interests!

🌐 That is why you never find any real (unedited) 5G health risks debate in mainstream media! ... They KNOW they gonna lose face.

ps. Some of the 59 links do not work anymore because Facebook decided to BLOCK all Fb Posts containing Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) non-commercial site build by me with NO ADDS no sponsors no connections with anyone ... no bullying ... no racism ... no calling for any form of violence ... etc. etc. etc. ... Lucky for me, I have a backup of everything I have done on Facebook, so I will FIX some broken links very soon and UPDATE the links to work just fine again.

Facebook is KNOWN to be completely willful slave to W.H.O. (Funded by a.o. Bill Gates & China).
Bogus "5G = virus" narrative & Dis-info memes exposed!
⚠️ In 2017 & 2018 before the mass C0VlD HYSTERIA ... I stated multiple times ON RECORD: That millions of new #5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/5g?__eep__=6) Cell Towers & Smartphones could/can have an impact when we have a "common cold" or "common flu" ... I NEVER said nor claimed "5G = virus" ... Vast majority of our Stop5G Fb Group members, neither!

🌐 I also stated that the increase of more and more Erratic Pulsed Microwaves (Non-Native EMFs) Cumulative Radiation everywhere like: 4G Wi-Fi & 5G AFFECTS our >> immune system << as it is shown in Declassified Navy Documents calling it "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" + 1000s other PubMed Peer Reviewed #Science2Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/science2stop5g?__eep__=6) Scientific publications like Dr. Martin Pall ... This evidence is NEVER allowed to be discussed in ANY mainstream media!

⚠️ This very important symptoms list has similarities with "flu-like symptoms" so WHY does the Mass Mainstream Media ONLY focus on the BOGUS "5G = virus narrative" false assumption we suppose to "agree" with? ... Which is an obvious LIE & Straw-man Argument Fallacy Tactic!

🤔 How many "5G = Virus Memes" are NOT made by real #Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/stop5g?__eep__=6) Activists but by those who GAIN to flood social media with DIS-INFO? Then use it to demonize ANYONE discussing 5G + Flu connection we already discussed in 2017 & 2018 ... What if they knew in advance 5G will make ALL common flu & common cold more dangerous for the weak, the elderly and those having multiple other conditions? ... If so, THAT explains the FRAMING of Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) Activists to make us go silent (mass censorship).

🦋 Now you know WHY Mainstream Media never allowed a real uncensored (live) debate between Pro 5G vs Stop5G Activists ever last 4 years! ... They FEAR US being treated fair & with 100% transparency for all to see.

If you have ANY EVIDENCE that last 7 years Mainstream Media allowed an honest real open debate where a summary does 100% justice what we stand for ... Feel free to share that evidence here in comments. If you are NOT able to do that ... does that, at least, make you think & question how the masses are conditioned in a very narrow (corporate approved) narrative?

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://substack.com/@johnkuhles)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://x.com/JohnKuhles1966) 🦜🦋🌳
Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (http://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G)
Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & Twitter.com/Stop5G (http://Twitter.com/Stop5G)
x.com/JohnKuhles1966 (https://x.com/JohnKuhles1966)
substack.com/@johnkuhles (https://substack.com/@johnkuhles)

Above is a 2024 updated and a corrected version! :cat::dog:

onawah

16th August 2021, 02:13

‘Historic Win’: CHD Wins Case Against FCC on Safety Guidelines for 5G and Wireless
08/13/21
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-wins-case-fcc-safety-guidelines-5g-wireless/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=794a9103-1b18-45ca-8441-001a334a6936

"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit court ruled the Federal Communications Commission failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation."
By
Children's Health Defense Team

"Children’s Health Defense (CHD) won its historic case today against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a case challenging the agency’s decision not to review its 1996 health and safety guidelines regarding wireless-based technologies including 5G.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit published its decision Aug.13. The court ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its1996 radiofrequency emission guidelines protect the public’s health.

The court’s judgment states:

“The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation…”

CHD Chairman and attorney on the case Robert F Kennedy, Jr. said:

“The court’s decision exposes the FCC and FDA as captive agencies that have abandoned their duty to protect public health in favor of a single-minded crusade to increase telecom industry profits.”

CHD’s case was consolidated with another similar case that was filed by the Environmental Health Trust. The organizations filed joint briefs in the case.

CHD’s lead attorney for the case, Scott McCollough, a telecommunication and administrative law attorney who represented the petitioners in the hearing, said:

“This is an historic win. The FCC will have to re-open the proceeding and for the first time meaningfully and responsibly confront the vast amount of scientific and medical evidence showing that current guidelines do not adequately protect health and the environment.

The court’s decision continued to say:

“…the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment…The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms.”

The petitioners in the case filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology which the FCC ignored, including evidence of already existing widespread sickness.

Attorney Dafna Tachover, CHD’s director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project, who initiated and led the case for CHD, said:

“The FCC will finally have to recognize the immense suffering by the millions of people who have already been harmed by the FCC’s and FDA’s unprecedented failure to protect public health. Finally the truth is out. I am hopeful that following this decision, the FCC will do the right thing and halt any further deployment of 5G.”

The court ruling was a two-to-one panel decision. Judge Robert Wilkins wrote the majority opinion. Judge Patricia Millett joined him and Judge Karen Henderson, who presided over the panel, issued a dissent.

CHD President Mary Holland said:

“The U.S. Court of Appeals decision in CHD’s case against the FCC reaffirms my faith in the judiciary. In these chaotic days, courts can still hold out the hope for sober-minded decisions according to the rule of law. I eagerly await FCC action in compliance with the court’s ruling.”

This historic case was filed by CHD on Feb. 2, 2020. The case challenged the agency’s decision not to review its 25-year-old radio-frequency emissions (RF) guidelines which regulate the radiation emitted by wireless technology devices (such as cell phones and iPads) and infrastructure (cell towers, Wi-Fi and smart-meters), and to promulgate biologically and evidence-based guidelines that adequately protect public health.

In 1996, the FCC adopted guidelines which only protect consumers from adverse effects occurring at levels of radiation that cause thermal effects (temperature change in tissue), while ignoring substantial evidence of profound harms from pulsed and modulated RF radiation at non-thermal levels. The FCC hasn’t reviewed its guidelines or the evidence since, despite clear scientific evidence of harm and growing rates of RF-related sickness.

In 2012, the Government Accountability Office of Congress published a report recommending the FCC reassess its guidelines. As a result, in 2013 the FCC published an inquiry to decide whether the guidelines should be reviewed. It opened docket 13-84 for the public to file comments.

Thousands of comments and scientific evidence by scientists, medical organizations and doctors, as well as hundreds of comments by people who have become sick from this radiation were filed in support of new rules. Nevertheless, on Dec. 4, 2019, the FCC closed the docket and published its decision, affirming the adequacy of its guidelines without proper assessment of the comments or the evidence.

The lawsuit, called a Petition for Review, contends that the agency’s decision is arbitrary, capricious, not evidence-based, an abuse of discretion and in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

CHD’s lawsuit was joined by nine individual petitioners. Petitioners include Professor David Carpenter MD, a world-renowned scientist and public health expert who is co-editor of the BioInitiative Report, the most comprehensive review of the science on RF effects; physicians who see the sickness caused by wireless radiation in their clinics; and a mother whose son died of a cell phone-related brain tumor.

CHD’s lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. However it was transferred to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit where it was joined with a similar lawsuit filed by the Environmental Health Trust and Consumers for Safe Cell Phones. The main brief and the reply brief were filed jointly by all petitioners."

ExomatrixTV

16th August 2021, 18:05

When I started this "Stop 5G before it's irreversible!" Project Avalon Forum Thread November 12th, 2017 ... I was one of the very first who created a Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) Facebook Group (Since November 11th, 2017) reaching over 35,000+ members in 2020 before the shadow banning started, Stop5G on Twitter (https://twitter.com/Stop5G) and created Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) long before the topic became a major hype worldwide in 2018-2019.

Back then I was well aware that many so called "debunkers" misrepresenting & framing Stop5G activism ... I know all their claims & counter-claims etc.

When anyone had NO CLUE what it is really about ... and start using "Google search engine" will find tons of misrepresentations plus corrupt "fact checkers" (which at the time was not evident for many people) accusing activist like me for spreading "fear porn" ... without allowing any real debate whatsoever ... Just like what they did with the Mass Covid Hysteria in Spring 2020.

Someone of the Project Avalon Admins/Moderators added a TAG called "5g fear porn (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/tags.php?tag=5g+fear+porn)" ... it is possible that this Project Avalon Admin or Moderator is not active now ... But I want to know WHO was it? ... And does he or she still think there is nothing to it? ... Have the decency to show your face and explain why you think it is all "fear porn" ... based upon what exactly?

If no one dares to take responsibility placing/adding this "5g fear porn (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/tags.php?tag=5g+fear+porn)" tag, within coming weeks, it would be nice if @Bill Ryan (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/member.php?u=6) can take it off.

I would really appreciate that.

After 857+ Replies & 163,837+ Views you can assume it created some new perspectives/insights some (avalonian skeptics) have overlooked or never heard or considered before. Especially when 99,99% of Mainstream Media does not allow open debate about it.

cheers,
John

ExomatrixTV

17th August 2021, 15:58

Is Five G Safe? ... Hell No!

1QIwQf88_N0
1913042796971254067
source (https://x.com/JohnKuhles1966/status/1913042796971254067)

ExomatrixTV

18th August 2021, 17:12

EMF (5G, WiFi...) Human Rights Scandal in Switzerland / Schweiz and Worldwide - by Réza Ganjavi, MBA:

cB02xHWLmco

Réza Ganjavi (https://www.rezamusic.com/about/biography) is Senior Co-Admin of Facebook.com/groups/Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) (almost 35,000 members).

ExomatrixTV

18th August 2021, 17:47

The FCC has Fallen to the Sword (https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-fcc-has-fallen-to-the-sword-of-lady-justice/) of Lady Justice!

¤=[Post Update]=¤

vEkBB7SLTgM

Patents by Inventor Hendricus G. Loos (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/hendricus-g-loos)

The name Hendricus G. Loos does not belong to a person, its a fictitious name. Perhaps the person working behind this name is Professor Ross Adey , who qualified in Medicine from Australia, then came to Oxford University to study brain physiology . Then he joined University of California in 1954, later joined the Brain Research Institute in 1961. He mainly studied the effects of ELF & microwaves on human brain and nervous system. He developed several devices for remote mind control and manipulation of nervous system which were later patented in US. There could be a few other such professionals and scientists, who developed the Mind Control devices under a single fictitious name 'Dr Hendricus G. Loos', actually working for DARPA or CIA, so as not to attract the attention of the Media or investigators.

As per available records Dr Hendricus G. Loos( fictitious ) was associated with Plasmadyne Corporation during the late fifties. He published an article about Yang-Mills field in 1969 in American Physical Society Journal. He had set up a shop in Fallbrook, California and developed Lagoona Research Laboratory. Then he worked with the department of Defence , US; department of Health & Human Services and Defence Advance Research Projects Agency ( DARPA) where he spent most of his time. In 2003 , he became the President of Cuewave Corporation. Dr Loos filed for business licence ( entity no-C2396570). Company's own site cuewave.com (http://www.cuewave.com) is nothing more than a copy of site for advertising business. Any search for business yields nothing more than directory listings. The listings themselves provide little additional data other than the business is listed for commercial physical research and has a standard industrial classification (SIC) with code of 8731(10) This classifies them for commercial, physical and biological research. He is also referred to as Dr Henry Loos or Dr Hank Loos. Since 1978 , he has been awarded 11 patents by US for devices mainly aiming for human nervous system manipulation. Some examples are:

USP# 3009080- Apparatus and method for generating and containing plasma having ultra high temperatures.
USP# 4245909- An optical instrument for measurement of particle size distribution.
USP# 6238333- Remote magnetic manipulation of nervous systems.
USP# 6091994- Pulsative manipulation f nervous systems.
USP# 5782874- Method and apparatus for manipulating nervous system.
USP# 6017302- Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system.
USP# 6506148-Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitor.

All devices are used for Mind Control projects run by CIA or other intelligence agencies. A group of researchers( under the name Dr H Loos) were actually a group of hired professionals for researching and inventing such devices which could be developed and used for mass mind control, PSYOPS, behavior modification later by CIA.

ExomatrixTV

20th August 2021, 00:10

Children, 5G, Wireless and Health Seminar to Chile Pediatric Society Sociedad Chilena de Pediatría:

s8g6K4SA7TE

ExomatrixTV

20th August 2021, 18:59

5G Legal Victory Will Force FCC to Revisit Evidence of EMF Dangers (https://www.bitchute.com/video/1BXyFrzUzpw6/)

1BXyFrzUzpw6

Derrick Broze breaks down a landmark victory in the fight against 5G technology and EMFs. This is a clip from Free Thinker Radio (8/18/21): The People Are Rising theconsciousresistance.com/free-thinker-radio-8-18-21-the-people-are-rising (https://theconsciousresistance.com/free-thinker-radio-8-18-21-the-people-are-rising/)

5G Legal Victory Will Force FCC to Revisit Evidence of EMF Dangers (https://www.facebook.com/derrickbroze/videos/584528846292317)

Derrick Broze breaks down a landmark victory in the fight against 5G technology and EMFs. This is a clip from Free Thinker Radio (8/18/21): The People Are Rising
Find more Free Thinker Radio: thehoustonfreethinkers.com (http://thehoustonfreethinkers.com)

ExomatrixTV

26th August 2021, 08:34

New 5G Starlink Dishes For Cars, Planes To Carry Radiation Hazard (https://wccftech.com/new-starlink-dishes-for-cars-planes-to-carry-radiation-hazard-warning) Warning

ExomatrixTV

26th August 2021, 21:51

Doctors and Scientists Call For Protective Policy After Historic Court Ruling on Wireless Radiation (https://ehtrust.org/doctors-and-scientists-call-for-protective-policy-after-historic-court-ruling-on-wireless-radiation)

Qb42IZrMwFg
In a landmark ruling in the case brought by Environmental Health Trust against the Federal Communications Commission, the court ruled the commission’s refusal to update 1996 human exposure limits and its failure to consider non-cancer health effects and environmental impacts from 5G and wireless technologies was capricious, arbitrary, and not evidence-based.
Stay updated with the latest EHT news by signing up for Environmental Health Trust’s newsletter. (https://ehtrust.org/publications/newsletters/)

Washington, D.C.: In a press conference (https://youtu.be/Qb42IZrMwFg) held Aug. 16, 2021, doctors and scientists are calling for action by the federal government after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s August 13, 2021, decision (https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/FB976465BF00F8BD85258730004EFDF7/$file/20-1025-1910111.pdf) found the Federal Communications Commission failed to explain why it ignored science showing harmful effects from wireless radiation.

The Court Decision

The landmark ruling in the case Environmental Health Trust et al. v the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found the FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act because the FCC’s 2019 decision (https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-126A1.pdf) not to update its 1996 exposure limits failed to address impacts of long term wireless exposure, failed to address unique impacts to children, failed to address the testimony of people injured by wireless radiation, failed to address impacts to wildlife and the environment, and failed to address impacts to the developing brain and reproduction.
The court remanded the issue back to the FCC for reasoned decision making on numerous issues. The court specifically ordered the FCC to do the following:

“Provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to retain its testing procedures for determining whether cell phones and other portable electronic devices comply with its guidelines.”
“Address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, the ubiquity of wireless devices, and other technological developments that have occurred since the Commission last updated its guidelines.”
“Address the impacts of RF radiation on the environment.”

Press Conference Read the Transcript (https://ehtrust.org/transcript-of-press-conference-following-eht-federal-court-victory-over-fcc-wireless-radiation-safety-limits/)

Expert participants in the press conference (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb42IZrMwFg) include:

Devra Davis PhD, MPH, EHT President
Dr. Hugh Taylor MD Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Hospital, president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine
Edward B. Myers, EHT attorney
Theodora Scarato MSW, EHT Executive Director
Frank Clegg, CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology and former President of Microsoft Canada
Paul Ben Ishai PhD, Professor Physics at Ariel University
Elizabeth Barris, The People’s Initiative Foundation
Cindy Franklin, Consumers for Safe Cell Phones

Full biographies are below.

“The Commission’s failure to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that exposure to RF radiation at levels below its current limits does not cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer renders inadequate the Commission’s explanation for its failure to discuss the implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, exposure to RF pulsation or modulation, or the implications of technological developments that have occurred since 1996, including the ubiquity of wireless devices and Wi-Fi, and the emergence of “5G” technology…we find the Commission’s order arbitrary and capricious in its complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.” – US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, August 13, 2021 Ruling (https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/FB976465BF00F8BD85258730004EFDF7/$file/20-1025-1910111.pdf)

The Legal Case

The case EHT et al. v. FCC (https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/) centers around the FCC’s safety limits for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation- the wireless radiation emitted from 5G, cell tower, cell phone, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and wireless technologies. These exposure guidelines developed by industry connected groups were adopted in 1996 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1996/08/07/96-20082/guidelines-for-evaluating-the-environmental-effects-of-radiofrequency-radiation)by the FCC just after the EPA was fully defunded (https://www.bems.org/node/980) from working on wireless radiation and non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Until being defunded, EPA had been tasked to develop human exposure limits for wireless- radiofrequency (RF) radiation (See EPA slide presentation (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1995-Briefing-for-the-FCC-by-the-EPA-on-the-Development-of-RF-Exposure-Guidelines.pdf), letter updating the FCC on guidelines (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/EPA-Letter-to-Mr.-Smith-by-Ramona-Travato.pdf) and US Science Advisory Board recommending the EPA develop guidelines (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/US-Science-Advisory-Board-Letter-that-recommends-that-the-EPA-develop-radiation-protection-guidance-to-protect-the-public-1984.pdf)) . FCC limits on human exposure have remained unchanged since 1996.

In 2013, the FCC asked the question in a formal Inquiry- (https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-review-rf-exposure-policies)should these 1996 limits be changed? Do children need more protections? Should the FCC change the way companies radiation test cell phones at a distance from the body? Over 7 years, the FCC received thousands of responses to their Inquiry, all of which were put on the 18-34 record (https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=13-84&sort=date_disseminated,DESC). However in 2019, the FCC issued a decision refusing to change these 1996 exposure limits for wireless radiation. We took the FCC to court because the record contained hundreds of peer reviewed published studies showing harm from wireless radiation at levels that were very low, lower than FCC thresholds. In addition, hundreds of scientists and organizations representing thousands of medical doctors were on the FCC record recommending public exposure be reduced due to this mounting evidence. The vast majority of submissions said loud and clear, “Wireless radiation is harmful. FCC limits do not protect us.”

Yet the FCC ignored the science and recommendations to change the 1996 safety limits submitted to the record (https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=13-84&sort=date_disseminated,DESC) of the 2019 Order Docket 19-226. (https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-126A1.pdf) The FCC then declared that it would retain the existing 1996 wireless RF radiation standards and terminated the Inquiry. FCC limits are based on the premise that overheating is the only harm from wireless radiation. So long as tissue is not overheated, safety can be assured. The FCC even further asserted without evidence that the same approach would prove relevant to the higher frequencies to be used in 5G networks.

The Environmental Health Trust and our scientific advisors had submitted thousands of pages of evidence (https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=13-84&q=(filers.name:(*environmental%20health%20trust*))&sort=date_disseminated,DESC)to the FCC and met numerous times with FCC staff. When the FCC clearly ignored the science, we took legal action.

About Environmental Health Trust

The Environmental Health Trust, a scientific nonprofit, lead petitioner in the case against the FCC, has worked on the issue of wireless radiation for over a decade submitting thousands of pages of evidence to the FCC in the years leading up to the court’s decision. EHT scientists testified in 2009 Senate hearings (CSPAN link (http://www.c-span.org/video/?288879-1/health-effects-cell-phone-use) ) and 2008 Congressional hearing (CSPAN link (https://www.c-span.org/video/?281358-1/health-effects-cell-phone-use)) on cell phone radiation- the last ones ever held. Following the last hearing, EHT held a conference in Washington DC (https://ehtrust.org/science/key-scientific-lectures/2009-expert-conference-on-cell-phone-radiation/) attended by the FCC with presentations by NIH and the American Cancer Society later followed by the release of a Research Agenda. (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/FINAL-ResearchAgendaWashington-091221.pdf)Although funding for US government research in the area dried up, EHT scientists continued to publish numerous studies (https://ehtrust.org/science/recent-scientific-publications-by-the-eht-scientific-team/) on the health effects of non -ionizing electromagnetic radiation and organized numerous national and international scientific conferences (https://ehtrust.org/science/key-scientific-lectures/) on the issue.

EHT co-founder Dr. Ronald Herberman (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=ronald%20b.%20herberman), who founded the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (https://hillmanresearch.upmc.edu/)(UPCI) and helped discover natural killer cells (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12068385/) capable of killing cancer . issued the first recommendations (https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/prominent-cancer-doctor-warns-about-cellphones/) by a US medical institution to his faculty recommending that they reduce cell phone radiation in a memo (https://ehtrust.org/ronald-b-herberman-md-director-university-pittsburgh-cancer-institute-upci-upmc-cancer-centers-memo-precautionary-cell-phone-use-upci-staff/) featured in the New York Times article “Researcher warns of brain cancer risk from cell phones (https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/technology/24iht-cellphone.4.14767955.html).”
EHT sent a letter to President Biden calling for federal accountability on this issue. EHT coordinated a letter to the FDA (https://ehtrust.org/expert-physicians-surgeons-and-scientists-call-for-fda-to-retract-biased-anonymous-report-of-cancer-impacts-of-cell-phones/) on their biased 2020 literature review on the science on cell phones and cancer. EHT has sent letters to the National Park Service (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-National-Park-Service-Sept-2020-3-1.pdf), and governments of France, (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/EHT-Submission-to-France-ANSES-on-5G-2.pdf) Bermuda, (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/EHT-Submission-to-France-ANSES-on-5G-2.pdf) India, (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/5G-Letter-to-India-Supreme-Court-1.pdf)Guernsey (https://www.saynoto5g.gg/reports/), British Columbia Trustee’s (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Colleges-and-Schools-2020-letter-on-Wi-Fi-and-Cell-Phones-.pdf) and more. (https://ehtrust.org/policy/resources-for-policy-makers/letters-testimony-health-effects-cell-phones-wireless-radiation/) EHT’s resources include a database on international policy action (https://ehtrust.org/policy/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/), letters by scientists on 5G (https://ehtrust.org/small-cells-mini-cell-towers-health-letters-scientists-health-risk-5g/), practical steps to reduce exposure (https://ehtrust.org/educate-yourself/ten-steps-to-safe-tech/), printable resources on safe technology, (https://ehtrust.org/resources-to-share/printable-resources/) a video library, (https://www.youtube.com/user/watchehtrust) toolkits on Wi-Fi in School (https://ehtrust.org/wifi-in-schools-tool-kit/) and 5G (https://ehtrust.org/take-action-on-5g-and-cell-phone-radiation/).

Bios of Press Conference Panelists

Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Co-founder and president of Environmental Health Trust

Devra Davis PhD, MPH (https://ehtrust.org/about/dr-devra-davis/) was a founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and has worked on numerous environmental exposures, from chemicals to lead to air pollution. Among the NAS reports she directed were those advising that tobacco smoke be removed from airplanes and the environments of young children. She was also a Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety And Hazard Investigation Board,former Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, anda member of the team of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize (https://ehtrust.org/devra-davis-part-of-the-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-awarded-nobel-peace-prize-alongside-honorable-al-gore/) with the Honorable Al Gore in 2007.

Dr. Hugh S. Taylor, MD, Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Hospital, president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine

Dr. Hugh S. Taylor MD has served as President of the Society for Reproductive Investigation and will be president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in 2021. He is a member of the National Academy of Medicine. Dr. Taylor is the Anita O’Keeffe Young Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Yale School of Medicine and Chief of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Yale-New Haven Hospital.

Dr. Taylor’s research on prenatal exposure to cell phone radiation (https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00312) was published in Scientific Reports. Dr. Taylor is also Professor of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology at Yale University. Dr. Hugh Taylor received his undergraduate training at Yale University, his medical degree from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Yale and his postdoctoral training included a fellowship in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility as well as a fellowship in Molecular Biology, both at Yale. Dr. Taylor is a board certified specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology and in Reproductive Endocrinology. He is a recipient of ten National Institutes of Health research grants and directs The Yale Center for Reproductive Biology. Dr. Taylor has published more than 400 articles and in leading medical journals.

Edward B. Myers, Attorney for Environmental Health Trust in EHT et al. v. FCC

Edward B. Myers has practiced law over 40 years representing government, trade associations, and private clients in complex regulatory matters involving energy, telecommunications, and the environment. In 2018, Mr. Myers worked with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in a successful challenge (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Court-Opinion.pdf)to an order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that had sought to eliminate any environmental review of 5G cell towers and transmitters. The NRDC filed an amicus brief (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/20-1025-NRDC-amicus-brief.pdf) in the EHT case. Mr. Myers is a graduate of Gettysburg College and the University of Notre Dame Law School.

Frank Clegg, CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology and former President of Microsoft Canada

Frank Clegg founded Canadians for Safe Technology (https://c4st.org/) (C4ST), a national, not-for-profit, volunteer-based coalition of parents, citizens, and experts. C4ST’s mission is to 1) educate and inform Canadians and policy makers about the dangers of the exposures to unsafe levels of radiation from technology; and 2) to work with all levels of government to create healthier communities for children and families.
Mr. Clegg was the President of Microsoft Canada from 1991 to 1996 and was re-appointed to that post from 2000-2005. He has played a leadership role in the country’s technology sector and in the broader Canadian community for many years. Mr. Clegg holds an Honors Degree in Mathematics from the University of Waterloo.

Paul Ben Ishai, PhD, Professor Physics at Ariel University

Paul Ben Ishai PhD is currently a Senior Lecturer with the Department of Physics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel, and the Head of the Laboratory of Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy. He was the Director of the Hebrew University’s Center for Electromagnetic Research and Characterization, Department of Applied Physics and has published over 50 articles including several papers (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Paul+Ben+Ishai&sort=date) on 5G frequencies and the skin. Until 2016, he was involved with the Laboratory of Prof. Feldman, concentrating on dielectric research. His research interests include soft condensed matter physics, glassy dynamics, biophysics, sub-terahertz spectroscopy, and dielectric spectroscopy. He currently holds 3 patents in these fields. He received the Ph.D. degree in applied physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Theodora Scarato, MSW, Executive Director of Environmental Health Trust (https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/)and a petitioner in the case.

Theodora Scarato directs EHT programs and coordinates scientific programs in the US and internationally with EHTs Senior Science Advisors. Scarato is lead policy analyst and researcher for the EHT database on international actions (https://ehtrust.org/policy/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/)– the most comprehensive collection of information on policy actions on cell phones and wireless.
Scarato has led efforts for federal accountability. She is on the board of PhoneGate Alert. (https://www.phonegatealert.org/en) Her Freedom of Information requests (https://ehtrust.org/the-cdc-hired-an-industry-consultant-to-develop-website-information-for-the-public/)found the CDC hired an industry consultant for website rewrites. Her communications (https://ehtrust.org/epa-birds-bees-trees-5g-wireless-effects/) with the EPA were submitted as key evidence in the Natural Resources Defense Council Amicus Brief (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/20-1025-NRDC-amicus-brief.pdf)submitted in the FCC lawsuit and provide critical information for legislators. She also coordinated the scientific review (https://ehtrust.org/oregon-department-of-health-report-on-wi-fi-health-effects-documentation-of-scientific-errors/) of the Oregon Health Department Report on wireless radiation which resulted in a planned September 2021 hearing in the Oregon Senate to investigate the issue. She has championed efforts for safe technology in schools (https://ehtrust.org/wifi-in-schools-tool-kit/)and her efforts lead to the Maryland Council on Children’s Environmental Health to issue recommendations (http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/first-state-in-the-nation-maryland-state-advisory-council-recommends-reducing-school-wireless-to-protect-children-777904.htm) to reduce children’s Wi-Fi exposure. She has coordinated efforts (https://ehtrust.org/will-the-world-health-organization-dr-van-deventer-answer-questions-on-transparency/) to hold the WHO EMF Project accountable to their online factsheets that downplay the science and the letter by scientists to the WHO EMF Project remains unanswered to this day. Scarato has long worked to showcase the conflicts of interest at ICNIRP (https://ehtrust.org/icnirp-the-international-commission-on-non-ionizing-radiation-protection-deep-industry-ties-no-oversight-and-only-14-members/)as documented in scientific articles and was featured in an European Parliament member’s report on ICNIRP conflict of interests. (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-JUNE-2020-2-1.pdf)

Scarato co-authored a landmark paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132319305347) on why and how to reduce radiofrequency wireless in buildings and has presented at the National Institutes of Health, the New Hampshire State 5G Commission, the San Francisco Teachers Union, the University of California San Francisco and the American Federation of Teachers.

source (https://ehtrust.org/doctors-and-scientists-call-for-protective-policy-after-historic-court-ruling-on-wireless-radiation/)

ps: there is an unknown Project Avalon Admin or Moderator (that remains cowardly anonymous) for adding "5g fear porn (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/tags.php?tag=5g+fear+porn)" tag to this Stop5G Forum Thread afraid to debate me ... sad.

ExomatrixTV

27th August 2021, 01:26

HISTORIC WIN AGAINST 5G DANGERS

https://static.arkengine.com/video/cll6vyeyf00gnik01njoin0wr/file/mp4/HISTORIC_WIN_AGAINST_5G_DANGERS.mp4

Children’s Health Defense earned a huge legal win in the court of appeals this week against the 1996 FCC safety guidance stating that wireless technology is safe unless it raises the temperature of your internal organs. Another step closer to bringing attention to the serious safety and privacy concerns with the mass rollout of 5G.

source (https://thehighwire.com/videos/historic-win-against-5g-dangers)

onawah

8th October 2021, 05:29

4 States. 5 Major Victories
email update from: Americans for Responsible Tech. info@americansforresponsibletech.org via gmail.mcsv.net
10/7/21
TOGETHER, WE WON.

"Plus 4 more exciting victories to report...

After months of non-stop lobbying, letter writing campaigns, op-ed submissions, testifying at public hearings, and so, so much more...

...on Monday, October 4th, Governor Newsom VETOED SB-556.

556 was a telecom-industry sponsored bill that would have removed significant local control over the deployment of 5G antennas in communities across the entire State of California.

The telecoms thought they had this one in the bag...until they didn't.

We want to reiterate our sincere thanks to all of the individuals and groups in California and beyond who helped make this victory possible. We are proud to have played a part in this great, collective success.
Excerpt from Governor Gavin Newsom's Veto Statement for SB-556:

"I am returning Senate Bill 556 without my signature.

This bill would restrict the ability of local governments and publicly-owned electric utilities to regulate the placement of small cell wireless facilities on public infrastructure and limit the compensation that may be collected for use of these public assets."

-Governor Gavin Newsom
Read Governor Newsom's Full Veto Statement Here
Four states. Four more wins.
What's the winning strategy for cell towers?
One word: AESTHETICS.
1. Sylvania, OH - In a 6-0 vote, Sylvania, OH City Council unanimously denies construction of 140-foot Tarpon Towers/Verizon cell tower at Northview High School. (To our knowledge, the City Council has not yet issued a written decision on this matter. However, you can view a recording of the final vote on the tower beginning at minute 15:10 of this video.) Note: We were happy to assist Sylvania residents defeat this ill-sited facility.

2. Lakeland, FL - Lakeland wins lawsuit over proposed cell tower near historic Dixieland. Read the news here. Forward the court's written decision to your local elected officials (mayor, city council members, city attorney, etc.). Let them know that they can legally fight towers on the basis of aesthetics and historic preservation! Note: This news is from July, 2021.

3. Brawley, CA - City Council unanimously rejects proposed installation of cell tower in heart of residential area, adjacent to playing fields. Read the news here. Note: We were happy to assist Brawley residents defeat this ill-sited facility.

4. Loudon County, VA - Loudoun County Board of Supervisors denies proposed AT&T cell tower facility atop Short Hill Mountain ridgeline due to aesthetic concerns and community backlash. Read the news here https://www.loudountimes.com/news/loudoun-supervisors-deny-proposed-at-t-cell-tower/article_0323db26-2632-11ec-ab90-9f404beb2700.html

Proposed installation site for approx. 110-foot cell tower in Brawley, California nestled in the heart of a residential area, adjacent to multiple playing fields.
PRO-TIP #1: In our experience, the most consistent winning strategy for fighting unwanted cell towers is arguing that the tower will impose an eyesore on your community, devalue nearby properties, and/or have a detrimental visual impact on surrounding historic areas.

PRO-TIP #2: Ensure that your local telecommunications ordinance is up-to-date and contains specific language to protect residents of your community from ill-sited 5G "small cell" antennas.

PRO-TIP #3: Want to stay ahead of the curve on wireless antenna installations in your area? File a FOIL request (or your state's equivalent) on your locality's website. Ask to review all pending applications for wireless telecommunications facilities within a one-mile radius of your home. Contact your local clerk if you have questions or concerns about how to do this.

*Please email us if you need assistance! info@americansforresponsibletech.org
Again, thank you to all of the organizations and individuals who have helped implement our political strategy in California and around the country. Our movement is growing rapidly, with a "reach" now exceeding over 600,000 individuals a month."
.

-The ART Team

onawah

26th October 2021, 20:39

Petition Filed in U.S. Supreme Court
10/26/21
From today's email update: Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>

The article at: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Appeal-Filed-in-U.S.-Supreme-Court-Yesterday.pdf

https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/nS3DP4FXptmJXG1AC0sBT_lAkLVzUruRb7JfMgX-lPk4eB82KJ9FGaHtopIecmGNzvb-hIbNCQO5RUIar63fCKiB-4SOr6YIuyjdPYrQnCb20sIjj6MF3pV-B1z2uix2ETDOWw4oMm44Gv0JL9HkYKdq4s-_MK3gHhQC5leEY23tUrPX36I0gIxQXpqZdMQ7wem_axO-u7Hib6X642si8adqEZuDO-uHhm2IeBVTSvu9rlRwhn7zieFnqnUVfY1Kg8Fzd86HFX2A88hLKTkB0NtxNmJ_QQRxmfHzsdBu8oFHN4oWmzIZ9c9fvdSPLaqc-r5Gr5X0s0scI8ZIUtYbS1J_zUMLCJmQEqIbpzN8eZX5ji1idI6efqgcCJK0EupRUvg7p6YMPmNgZx2AgaAlf2To24NrpHYW-tI2yUBArQnN6gqHzkyKnQ3jjOzCwJAuP_xwwdu45nx1g3vLXj4AOuj5s1-A-Z0tGVTo7PhJtGV2a7vTTw6ssCAy=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=WV8ULHsBhs8nQuVsEo9UwFMqABJ5N 7Du9NnOSTi7Uxrxj20xpeLQXH8gK0yepiNZ4uLbOYx6zERdD6iivaHerB79YFRv2k7m92SS8JFEnuJpMmQvTNa4lojimdGkUzFEP QrGxdvJne2GFse59rL5Tbrz16OI_BDsVYoUMlpNtJLgxSq9oWRpNLqGaM0DmBJ8oD8NZQdyLPfu-2N32YvB_7kdRbxq9nk40Xff5F7vxr6F

"The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety filed a petition yesterday afternoon asking the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on a threat to the very existence of this country, and this world.

Twenty-five years ago, Congress passed a law that permitted the unlimited pollution of every square inch of this country with microwave radiation. The polluters -- telecommunications companies -- were exempted from all liability for injury, death and property damage. Cities and states were forbidden to protect their citizens. State courts were prohibited from hearing lawsuits. The millions of people who have been injured, killed, and deprived of their income and property by cell towers and antennas have had no remedy for their injuries, deaths and losses.

The law that accomplished this assault on our country is the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 704 of that law states:

“No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.”

The “Commission” is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has no authority over health or environment, and does not even have the power to enforce its own regulations concerning microwave (also called radio frequency) radiation. The result of Section 704 is that no one has been protecting our country, our citizens, and our environment from this radiation for the past 25 years -- not the FCC, not the states, not the cities, and not the courts.

The advent of 5G technology has brought this situation to a crisis point. Like many other cities, Santa Fe, New Mexico passed an ordinance exempting antennas in the public rights-of-way from all land use requirements, and in 2018, franchises were awarded to five telecommunications companies to place cell towers and antennas anywhere they please in the streets and on the sidewalks of Santa Fe. The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety immediately filed a lawsuit in federal district court. That lawsuit is now before the highest court in the land.

We are asking the Supreme Court to rule on two related questions:

1. Does Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 violate the right of access to courts guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution?

2. Does “environmental effects” mean “health effects” in Section 704?

Either an affirmative answer to the first question, or a negative answer to the second, would immediately restore to all Americans the right to protect their health, their lives and their property from microwave radiation, and would subject telecommunications companies to liability for the injuries, deaths and property damage they are causing.

The petition we filed in the Supreme Court yesterday is here:

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Santa-Fe-Alliance-Petition-for-Certiorari-as-filed.pdf

We need as many organizations as possible to support this petition by joining the amicus (friend of the court) brief that is now being prepared, and which must be filed in the Supreme Court by November 24, 2021. The Supreme Court picks and chooses the cases it will decide, and the more support we have from organizations throughout the world, the more likely the Court will grant our petition and hear our case. The granting of our petition, by itself, will get publicity, and will advance public awareness of this invisible threat to our nation.

Simply talking to one another, putting on conferences, organizing protests, and filing lawsuits against the FCC, which has no authority over health, has not and cannot advance our cause to any significant degree. The proper target for attack is not the FCC, but the unconstitutional law that Congress passed 25 years ago. If your organization would like to join the amicus brief and has not already done so, please send the following information to me at info@cellphonetaskforce.org as soon as possible:

1. Organization's name, email address, mailing address, and phone number
2. Your name and your role in the organization
3. Organization's website and social media URLs (if any)
4. Roughly, how many members?
5. Mission statement
6. Is your organization for profit?
7. Any other information you would like to share

Thank you.

Donations in any amount are always appreciated. This litigation has been costly. The Cellular Phone Task Force is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and donations from U.S. residents are tax-deductible.

DONATE

Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
October 26, 2021

The last 29 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/newsletters/
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, French and Norwegian.

To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe"

DaveToo

26th October 2021, 21:25

Me thinks there's a wee bit of a double standard going on here.

We must fight CLIMATE CHANGE with all our might to keep the world
in harmony with nature, BUT...

We should not fight EMF CHANGE with all our might to keep the world
in harmony with nature.

Huh???

Greta you can't have your cake and your 5G cellphone too!

Lariliss

27th October 2021, 07:59

onawah

27th October 2021, 20:39

THE MOST DANGEROUS TECHNOLOGY EVER INVENTED Part Two
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
10/27/21
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/The-Most-Dangerous-Technology-Ever-Invented-Part-Two.pdf

https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/x4b_3bdJJ-EsDNVU1bJmkVUQZ8bKUu6TWuODBbDIeIV8VVaZ25TCTw01FWBEA34KU-vkZ-nDij9VznmEgaqIv-mxJEmy34oaP_p1qr3iaOaGB1KLvQXqqVYjG8ECAFqfVz2ke_NwEFrSybd2L7M0rKUesbb1mWehuRfNFRCYMkX_xfxos9ZoJxLxez BOgDCjMBoBDT5xZASiRNnZLFWJpmWlc-OtKTWVLVwFfppumCA7n_1tLqQj2JBVoZd0Fyu8Hlz_L4sAWUgu1U-L_eHOeb3p_GNxGpI4WOTkjBWx9RXlDZTZ0fnFoZS0uOCKFm39tW0t2J7IC8M9lFDObCslmbqNyc-bDnV0x-PHwWa-APGL45QpCxvUEhKldLATkcfXN669I3zWu3VCwYXXL19dsL_SMT-XMW_ACU8T_Wzu2NDupjLBEEEbo_H8oLe0kXVbme5rJ1cJi0nSxTwenX3kmNMUMVnd4VHdCr15vp9duvvOer7liszTqGFs=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=LDsEttITFbpCPRLiLID6QoRlSkHSl CED_tmwBGDsLU0KaSA64AanqRBckERpJhpA3vLRg26F7Sp9CP2j9WNUjf7WG_ZsfNmLWHFgGCjmVkp-btCuVHbw4zWEm4AgGmJLi1hMC4gtNJjqCv7n-cPNhZomiAmO8udCjiAkgASXS9KuM8sWqcffPlz1Eu9CeXOrUcdeAxmS60_soyVh9yuSwe0mT95NwhwDLbUZQcoWNEP_

"There is No Dose Response for Microwave Radiation

The selling of cell phones is, and always has been, based on lies and deception. The biggest lie is that they are “low power” devices and that this makes them safe. That is a double lie. It is a lie because they are not low power. If you put a cell phone -- any cell phone -- in your hand or next to your body, you are being blasted by more microwave radiation from your phone than you are getting from any cell tower, and by ten billion times as much microwave radiation as you are getting from the sun, the Milky Way, or any other natural sources. The exposure guidelines established by the Federal Communications Commission reflect this reality: cell towers are permitted to expose your body at a specific absorption rate of 0.08 watts per kilogram, while cell phones are allowed to expose your brain at a specific absorption rate of 1.6 watts per kilogram, which is twenty times higher.

And it is a lie because low power devices are not any safer than high power devices. The reason for this is that electromagnetic fields are not toxins in the ordinary sense, and the rule in toxicology that a lower dose is a safer dose does not apply to microwave radiation. As Allan Frey wrote in 1990:

“Electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance to living beings like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances, the greater the dose, the greater the effect -- a dose-response relationship. Rather, living beings are electrochemical systems that use low frequency EMFs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. To model how EMFs affect living beings, one might compare them to the radio we use to listen to music... If you impose on the radio an appropriately tuned EMF or harmonic, even if it is very weak, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if we impose a very weak EMF signal on a living being, it has the possibility of interfering with normal function if it is properly tuned. That is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicological model.”

The most thorough investigation of the blood-brain barrier effect, which Frey discovered in 1975, was done at Lund University in Sweden beginning in the late 1980s with various sources of microwave radiation and later, in the 1990s and 2000s, with actual cell phones. They found not only that there is not a dose response, but that there is an inverse dose response for this type of injury. They exposed laboratory rats to what is now called 2G cell phone radiation, and then they reduced the power level of the radiation ten-fold, a hundred-fold, a thousand-fold, and ten thousand-fold. And they found, to their surprise, that the greatest damage to the blood-brain barrier occurred not in the rats that were exposed at full power, but in the rats that were exposed to phones whose radiation was reduced by a factor of ten thousand! This was the equivalent of holding a cell phone more than one meter away from your body. The leader of the research team, neurosurgeon Leif Salford, warned that non-users of cell phones were being damaged by their neighbors’ cell phones, and that this technology was “the world’s largest biological experiment ever.”

And in a further set of experiments, published in 2003, Salford’s team exposed young rats to what is now called a 2G cell phone, just once for two hours, either at full power, or at two different levels of reduced power, and sacrificed them 50 days later to examine their brains. They found that a single exposure to an ordinary cell phone operating at normal power had permanently destroyed up to 2% of almost all the rats. Damaged neurons dominated the picture in some areas of their brains. When the power of the phone was reduced ten-fold it caused brain damage in every rat. When the power of the phone was reduced one hundred-fold, this type of permanent brain damage was observed in half of the exposed animals.

And in still further experiments, published in 2008, they exposed rats to a cell phone for two hours once a week for a year, still using what is now called a 2G cell phone. The exposed rats suffered from impaired memory, regardless of whether they were exposed at an SAR level of 60 milliwatts per kilogram or 0.6 milliwatts per kilogram. In other words, reducing the power level by a factor of one hundred did not make the cell phone less dangerous.

The lack of a dose response has been reported over and over. Physicist Carl Blackman spent much of his career at the Environmental Protection Agency figuring out why not only particular frequencies but also particular power levels of RF radiation cause calcium to flow out of brain cells. Ross Adey at UCLA, Jean-Louis Schwartz at the National Research Council of Canada, and Jitendra Behari at Jawaharlal University in India reported the same thing. Geneticist Sisir Dutta, studying the same phenomenon at Howard University in 1986, found peaks of calcium flow at SAR levels of 2 W/kg and 1 W/kg, and also at .05, .0028, .001, .0007, and .0005 W/kg, with some effect all the way down to .0001 W/kg. The effect at 0.0007 W/kg SAR was quadruple the effect at 2.0 W/kg, in other words a 3,000-fold reduction in power level resulted in a 4-fold increase in calcium disturbance. The frequency was 915 MHz, the same frequency that was later to be used for cell phones.

Maria Sadchikova and her Soviet colleagues, in the 1960s and 1970s, examined hundreds of workers exposed to microwave radiation on the job, and consistently found that the sickest workers were the ones who were exposed to the lowest, not the highest power levels.

Igor Belyaev, at Stockholm University, found that genetic effects occurred at specific frequencies and that the magnitude of the effect did not change with power level over 16 orders of magnitude, all the way down to 0.000000000000000001 watts per square centimeter, a level that is one quadrillion times lower than what a cell phone delivers to one’s brain.

Dimitris Panagopoulos, at the University of Athens, found that fruit flies exposed to a cell phone for just one minute a day for five days produced 36 percent fewer offspring than flies that were not exposed at all. When he exposed them to the phone for six minutes a day for five days, it reduced the number of their offspring by 50 to 60 percent. And the maximum effect occurred when the cell phone was about one foot away from the flies, not when it was touching the vial that the flies were in. In further research, he showed that the effect is due to DNA damage and consequent cell death caused by the radiation.

In another experiment, Panagopoulos’s colleague, Lukas Margaritis, exposed fruit flies to various frequencies of RF radiation at exposure levels ranging from 0.0001 watts per kilogram to 0.04 watts per kilogram, and found that even a single exposure to any of these frequencies at any of these power levels for just 6 minutes caused a significant amount of ovarian cell death.

And in further research, Margaritis’s team exposed fruit flies to a cell phone either once for 6 minutes, once for 12 minutes, 6 minutes a day for 3 days, or 12 minutes a day for 3 days. Under each condition the phone tripled to sextupled the amount of ovarian cell death. And then this team tried other sources of microwave radiation for between 10 and 30 minutes per day for up to 9 days and found that each of them reduced the number of offspring by between 11 and 32 percent. The cell phone and the cordless phone had the greatest effect, but the WiFi, the baby monitor, the Bluetooth, and the microwave oven also substantially reduced the fecundity of the flies.

The effects on insects are so obvious that even a high school student can easily demonstrate them. In 2004, Alexander Chan, a sophomore at Benjamin Cardozo High School in Queens, New York, exposed fruit fly larvae daily to a loudspeaker, a computer monitor, and a cell phone for a science fair project and observed their development. The flies that were exposed to the cell phone failed to develop wings.

What Are We Doing to Nature?

We are distressing and disorienting not only birds, but also, as is being discovered, insects. It appears that all little creatures that have antennae use them to send and receive communications electronically -- communications that are being interfered with and drowned out by the much more powerful communications of our wireless devices.

When honey bees perform their waggle dance to inform one another of the location of food sources, it is not only a visual dance but an electromagnetic one. During the dance they generate electromagnetic signals with a modulation frequency between 180 and 250 Hz. And they send another kind of signal, which has been called the “stop” signal, up to 100 milliseconds long, at a frequency of 320 Hz. The stop signal is used when the colony already has too much food, and it causes the dancers to stop dancing and leave the dance floor. Uwe Greggers, at Freie Universität Berlin, discovered that bees will start walking and actively moving their antennae in response to artificially generated electromagnetic fields that imitate these natural signals, even in the absence of any visual or auditory cues. Bees whose antennae he had removed or coated with wax did not respond to these signals.

Pollination is also dependent on electromagnetic communication -- between bees and flowers. Bees carry positive charge on their bodies from flying in the global atmospheric electric field, while flowers, being connected to the earth, carry a negative charge. Dominic Clarke, at the University of Bristol, has proved that not only does this facilitate pollen transfer from flowers to bees, but that bees sense and are attracted not only to the colors of flowers but also to the distinct patterns of their electric fields. The electric field of a flower diminishes immediately after being visited by a bee, and other bees “see” this and only visit flowers whose electric field is robust. While honey bees see the fields with their antennae, bumble bees see the fields more with the hairs that cover their bodies, which not only make them such distinctive creatures but also function as a kind of antenna.

In 2007, German biologist Ulrich Warnke published an important booklet in both English and German titled Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by “Elektrosmog” (Bienen, Vögel und Menschen: Die Zerstörung der Natur durch ‚Elektrosmog'). In it, he reminded us that there are only two long-range forces -- gravity and electromagnetism -- that shape everything in the universe including our bodies, and that we ignore that fact at our peril. Electricity is the foundation of life, he warned, and “this destruction of the foundation of life has already wiped out many species forever.” We cannot immerse our world, he said, in a sea of electromagnetic radiation that is up to 10,000,000,000 times as strong as the natural radiation that we evolved with without destroying all of life. He summarized the research that he and others had done with honey bees. It is no wonder, wrote Warnke, that bees are disappearing all over the world.

They began disappearing at the dawn of the radio age. On the small island lying off England’s southern coast where Guglielmo Marconi sent the world’s first long-distance radio transmission in 1901, the honey bees began to vanish. By 1906, the island, then host to the greatest density of radio transmissions in the world, was almost empty of bees. Thousands, unable to fly, were found crawling and dying on the ground outside their hives. Healthy bees imported from the mainland began dying within a week of arrival. In the following decades, Isle of Wight disease spread along with radio broadcasting to the rest of Great Britain, and to Italy, France, Switzerland, Germany, Brazil, Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States. In the 1960s and 1970s its name changed to “disappearing disease.” It became urgent in the late 1990s with the wireless revolution, and became a worldwide emergency by 2006, when it was renamed “colony collapse disorder.” Today not only domestic bees, but all wild bees, are in danger of extinction.

Amphibians are not only disappearing, but large numbers of amphibian species have already gone extinct, even in the most remote, pristine areas of the world -- pristine, that is, except for communication towers and radar stations emitting microwave radiation. Amphibians are the most vulnerable of all classes of animals on the planet to electromagnetic radiation, and they have been dwindling and going extinct since the 1980s. When I looked into this in 1996, every species of frog and toad in Yosemite National Park was disappearing. In the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve of Costa Rica, the famous and highly protected golden toad had gone extinct. Eight of thirteen frog species in a Brazilian rainforest preserve had gone extinct. The famous gastric-brooding frog of Australia was extinct. Seventy-five species of the colorful harlequin frogs that once graced streams in the tropics of the Western Hemisphere were extinct. Today, more than half of all known kinds of frogs, salamanders and caecilians (snake-like amphibians), amounting to 4,300 species, are either extinct or in danger of extinction.

In 1996, when cell towers marched into remote areas of the United States, mutant frogs began turning up by the thousands in lakes, streams and forests all across the American Midwest. Their deformed legs, extra legs, missing eyes, misplaced eyes, and other genetic mistakes were frightening school children out on field trips.

In 2009, wildlife biologist Alfonso Balmori did a simple, obvious experiment on the balcony of an apartment in Valladolid, Spain not far from a cell tower, an experiment that proved what was happening: he raised tadpoles in two identical tanks, except over one of them he draped a thin layer of fabric that was woven with metallic fibers, which admitted air and light but kept out radio waves. The results shocked even Balmori: in a period of two months, 90 percent of the tadpoles in the tank without the shielding had died, versus only 4 percent in the shielded tank.

Similar shielding experiments have confirmed, in spades, what is happening to birds, and what is happening to our forests.

Scientists at the University of Oldenburg in Germany were shocked to find, beginning in 2004, that the migratory songbirds they had been studying were no longer able to orient themselves toward the north in spring and toward the southwest in autumn. Suspecting that electromagnetic pollution might be responsible, they did for their birds what Balmori did for his tadpoles a few years later: they shielded the aviary from radio waves during the winter with aluminum sheeting. “The effect on the birds’ orientation capabilities was profound,” wrote the scientists. The birds all oriented toward the north the following spring.

And in 2007, in a backyard laboratory in the foothills of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains, Katie Haggerty decided to do the same experiment with aspen seedlings. She wanted to find out if radio waves were responsible for the decline of aspen trees all over Colorado that had begun in 2004. She grew 27 aspen trees -- nine without any screening, nine with aluminum window screening around their pots which kept out radio waves, and nine with fiberglass screening which kept out just as much light but let in all the radio waves. After two months, the new shoots of the radio-shielded aspens were 74 percent longer, and their leaves 60 percent larger, than those of either the mock-shielded or the unshielded aspens. And in the fall, the shielded trees had large, healthy leaves in brilliant fall colors that aspens are famous for: bright orange, yellow, green, dark red, and black. The mock-shielded and unshielded trees had small leaves in drab yellow and green, covered with gray and brown areas of decay. The only thing that had changed in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains in 2004 was the installation of a new emergency communication system called the Digital Trunked Radio System composed of 203 radio towers whose transmissions covered every square inch of the state.

(to be continued)

Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
October 27, 2021

The last 29 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, French and Norwegian.

To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe or click on this link: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe/ "

onawah

27th October 2021, 20:47

It appears we have a 5G shill in our midst.

Dears,
We are exposed to EMF for generations.
1. Telecommunication:
has very strict EMF control, installed even outdoors so that it is not affecting the human body. Indoors regulations sometimes are so high, that it is hard to get the coverage with indoor antennas. 2G/3G/4G/5G, the same, if we have all of them on the site, they are summed. The higher ‘G’ the less is transmitter power.
next generation step means more effective spectrum usage; 5G is the same Hertz as Wi-Fi, but technically, it has better performance for moving objects, better latency and it is telecom;
a microwave oven is in the same spectrum and is more dangerous near to you making dinner hot.
2. Wi-Fi is already mentioned, it is all around indoors competing telecom for data users.
3. Industry. Mining is going deeper and getting more dangerous, breaking the boarders of human safety regulations. We send 250 ton vehicles, carrying 250 of ore more on itself without, fully autonomous without any humans to be in danger. Thanks to 5G technology.

All the wireless coverage providers go through the path of regulations and restrictions before making a new roll out and they have to pass the checks.
5G transmitters will reuse 4G sites and even make the EMF less with more efficient technology replacement.

It is the responsibility of every one habits, life style and comfort zones.
Nice to sit in a warm house watching the cold outside and sending messages, using wi-fi, while my 4G mobile gets calls and my bath gets warm.

Michel Leclerc

27th October 2021, 22:15

Dear Onawah,

Some time ago I visited a family member, who is a mathematician by profession. He invited me to visit his garden, and his fruit trees. His garden was divided in square plots between which a regular grid of paths allowed one to see and use every one of the plots. Each of the five or six plots was planted with apple and pear trees, 16 per plot, in a 4 x 4 pattern.
As he lived in an area not far from the middle-sized towns Belgium is sprinkled with, as is, as you know, your Netherlands, I asked about pollination. Were there sufficient bees?
Oh, that is not a problem, he replied, I buy them. You buy bees, really? (I was thinking of the truckloads of bees carted from all over the United States to the Californian almond tree groves, so that the world can eat almonds.) Yes, he said, I buy them in boxes. Boxes? Yes, neat cubes of cardboard of (I do not remember the number of centimeters, let’s call the number x then) x by x by x centimeters.

A number of years earlier I discussed with my language and communication students in the business entities I had as my company’s customers the fate of the young girls murdered in the early 90s’ pedosexual crime crisis in Belgium. The consensus among my students was that it was far better for all those girls to have died or been killed than that they would have had to live on with the memories of what had been done to them.

As long as I can afford good honey from far-away mountainous areas, why would I worry about bees?

As long as I manage to protect my own children, why would I worry about the neighbours‘s kids being eaten alive?

That was the situation, in Belgium, twenty to thirty years ago.
What we are witnessing now, with people being complicit in murder and suicide on a gigantic scale, is the outcome of the suppression of pain and guilt – especially guilt – twenty to thirty years ago.

As the bees, we have lost our ability to fly by intuition. We dance, alone, with headphones on, in dancings for hundreds of people who do not touch each other, instead of dancing sophisticated ballets showing each other where food is, for body, soul, consciousness, spirit.

As the neighbour’s girls, we are being eaten alive, this time from the inside out.

...

(I do love mathematics.)

hm337

2nd November 2021, 01:48

5G is not needed for faster internet on mobile phones - it is fast enough. 5G is not needed for industrial robots and for in-home smart devices, as those are attached to LAN or Wi-Fi access points. 5G is perhaps needed for something else. But what?

5G should not be looked in isolation from other conspiracy theories. We have theories about graphene being put in chemtrails, food, vaccines, masks, PCR tests. Why graphene? Because this material of the future is extremely thin (2D layer of carbon atoms), extremely strong and super conductive. Graphene is exceptionally good for making brain to computing interfaces. Look at this video

31XN-63kxBo

InBrain company specialize in producing graphene based man to machine interfaces for medical purposes.

We are developing the next generation of neuroelectronic therapies powered by machine learning. Our graphene-brain interfaces have the capability of reading at a resolution never seen before, as well as detecting therapy-specific biomarkers and triggering highly focal adaptive neuromodulation for increased outcomes in personalised neurological therapies.

https://www.inbrain-neuroelectronics.com/

Look at this scientific papers:

1. Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells

On the other side, graphene can be exploited as a substrate for tissue engineering. In this case, conductivity is probably the most relevant amongst the various properties of the different graphene materials, as it may allow to instruct and interrogate neural networks, as well as to drive neural growth and differentiation, which holds a great potential in regenerative medicine.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29695956/

2. Bioinspired mechano-photonic artificial synapse based on graphene/MoS2 heterostructure
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd9117

So, there is work on graphene based brain interfaces (company inBrain) the work on building graphene based synthetic synapses used in artificial neural networks (paper 2) and work on interfacing graphene with neural cells(1). We know that science development in military and secret labs is years ahead of the one published in scientific papers.

What if the agenda behind 5G and Graphene spreading is one agenda - a plan to connect us all to artificial intelligence? What if the end game is the assimilation of humans into AI grid? Perhaps top elites have already gone through the assimilation process and now the process is by them imposed on lower levels in hierarchy and eventually on all humans.

onawah

5th November 2021, 08:08

The Most Dangerous Technology Ever Invented - Part Three
11/4/21
Arthur Firstenberg info@cellphonetaskforce.org
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/The-Most-Dangerous-Technology-Ever-Invented-Part-Three.pdf
https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/sGqSEtymbi8j2eaGyUlTOdo2uLdqzDW17yHF95ppTyWoiS8UwBgBJ-HQHZ6mWaZzGy6rJa8Kv-1nZyusVxr6ejwn7s-yRcs5gMtHO5T6atacYFvsW3ruRuJFt77zleHSgEAn1ng_D3JQKa68CeNABnaDiIPjyJaziGV3EbUCz9n_SGv6GHC8d45L7jqYW0z RlbX9AjZp6gvTrwONAd5aUAgbHFOZ8mudwFHlgBoE6dP6_jRaABUqZ1whGI08BN5I5inMMC9H2jrBBc7WsYkv2gQD6p8xs235MCq s1Okb5oyM6GDQUdWJJ11s10F-3nZYfGknRYmmaalbBxeFXPkJ6Hetbmk77MG4u7FfmEGxjmCbf9NrqCmpfYDE6WGQU9huzRAYCd291l8heRSHseX36DgUZ0C7VscP Ry89e_HRGC5EyWqsTIlzxpIyNFof0H91lRz5ZfJgM7EuO8ehK4NWZUj67Fr5wnYxFYTciY1zqVa_1DpDazZlbsMG=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=k7a1cxoliifDt-9SHMtsXpTGwE1CKndK_-vd8FjaGhFrf2QstHt-OxSYYyLvV4Bge27sa4oq7XjPnIFYBN9ZvGO8JVSzc9gkMwOML_gRWWI-zGnJs7UsMkcPNKUOfYViEVqsAhD1i2rTPrUURxT3cKKa6Gp8heerCpzoPkhsSwTlIYRIRZ5imzWzzmNAC5UDt2B_zB7WkoUxU5ct hWW5KorGL7PqqCXhKDCnxQl-272w

"Cell Phones Are Not Here to Stay

On the day digital cell phone service began in New York City, I was away from home at a three-day law conference. The day I returned home I became dizzy. Within a few days I was also nauseous and I had uncontrollable tremors. I had the first asthma attack of my life. My eyeballs felt like they were bulging out, my lips felt dry, fat and puffy, I felt pressure in my chest, and the bottoms of my feet hurt. I became so weak I couldn’t lift a book. My skin became so sensitive I couldn’t bear to be touched and I could hardly stand to wear my clothes. My head was roaring like a freight train. After the fourth day I could not sleep or eat. During the sixth night my larynx went into spasm three times. Each time that happened I couldn’t draw a breath in or out and I thought I was going to die. I left home the next morning, never to return.

This did not happen only to me, or only to a few people. Beginning November 14, 1996, the day Omnipoint Communications turned on all those cell towers, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers became suddenly ill. Many thought they were having a heart attack, a stroke or a nervous breakdown. The Health Department called it an influenza epidemic, and it lasted until the following May. They did not stop to wonder why it hit only New York and not any nearby cities at that time. Weekly mortality statistics from the Centers for Disease Control revealed a 17 percent rise in mortality in the city beginning the week of November 17, lasting 11 weeks, that killed 2,300 people.

The epidemic did not hit Boston until the following year, when Sprint began service there on November 12, 1997. Mortality spiked by 15.5% for 16 weeks. It hit San Diego when Pacific Bell began service there on November 1, 1996, lasted for 17 weeks, and raised mortality by 14.5%. It did not hit nearby Los Angeles until the following summer, when Pacific Bell began service there on July 3, 1997, and mortality rose by 30% for the next 15 weeks. It hit Philadelphia in the spring, when Sprint began service there on April 3, 1997, and Detroit in the fall, when Sprint began service there on October 15, 1997. It hit Jacksonville, Florida the previous fall, when Powertel began service there on October 15, 1996. It hit Chicago, Milwaukee, Austin, San Antonio, Fort Worth, Houston, Atlanta, Fresno, Spokane, Portland, Sacramento, Charlotte, and Tulsa, beginning in each city on the day digital cell phone service became available in that city.

I learned, in 1996, that power levels do not matter. After microwave radiation had nearly killed me in Brooklyn after only six days of exposure, I was sure the radiation levels must be sky high, and I hired a professional engineer, Stuart Maurer, to go to my house with his spectrum analyzer to measure the radiation. I came down for the day from my motel room in upstate New York to watch him. To my astonishment, the highest level he measured, anywhere in my house, was 0.0001 microwatts per square centimeter. Clearly I still had a lot to learn about microwave radiation, and many things I thought I knew were wrong.

The same thing is happening now with 5G, only this time instead of blaming an influenza virus, society is blaming a coronavirus. And this time, it is happening everywhere at once instead of one city at a time. On October 13, 2020, Verizon issued a press release announcing the availability of its 5G network throughout the United States, and on the same day Apple issued a press release announcing the launch of its 5G phone, the iPhone 12. The iPhone 12 and 12 Pro were available in stores October 23, and the iPhone Mini and Max were available in early November. And in every state except two, mortality began to suddenly rise the week of October 24 or soon after, and not later than the week of November 21. The two exceptions were Wisconsin, where the mortality spike began the week of October 17, and Hawaii, which did not have a significant rise in deaths last winter. Nationally, mortality rose an average of 25% for 20 weeks, and 300,000 people died.

It is happening everywhere at once also to birds, insects, wildlife, and plant life. A correspondent in Knoxville, Tennessee wrote to me last week:

“These past couple of months I've noticed 5 bumblebees now on our flowers that have appeared paralyzed to me. We unfortunately have Verizon's 5G Ultra Wideband very close to our home, which is only available outside, and I think they are being impacted by that. We brought 4 of them into our house, each at different times, and 3 of the 4 revived within about 5 minutes, so I then released them back outside. The 4th one took a little over an hour to revive before it was able to fly off.”

Another observer, in East Dover, Vermont, wrote, a couple of days ago:

“We grow 3 acres of blackcurrants, 200 blueberry bushes (11 varieties) and a smattering of other novelty berry plants. Our small farm is certified organic with 8 open acres certified (only 3 planted) and the remainder of the 31 acres is wooded. The blackcurrants are early bloomers and our 4 varieties all bloom within a few days of each other. There are so many different pollinating insects that come to the fields including a certain type of bumblebee with a red middle. It is wondrous to see and hear all the different shaped insects noisily working away.

“This spring, as I walked down the rows and admired all the blossoms in the front field, I suddenly stopped because it was almost completely quiet. There were two bumblebees among the 2,225 blackcurrant bushes and their buzzing was so noticeable because everything was so silent. When I mentioned this to a fifth generation apple farmer, he said that not only were there no pollinators this year, the timing of everything was off. For example, his asparagus was two weeks early (ours was, too). Compared with 2020, our blackcurrant blooming times were 2 weeks early this year. It was a cold spring but I would think that would delay blooming. So that is another reason the insects weren’t around yet. Two weeks is a huge amount of time! The blueberries were also generally early and the usual succession of blooms through the varieties was altered.

“The next day, I raced over to Forever Wild, a honeybee farmer, and secured a pallet of four hives. It was too cold for them to fly so they stayed in their hives in the middle of a gorgeous bloom of blackcurrants. Apparently, bumblebees will fly when it is in low 50s but honeybees need it to be at least 59 degrees. The honeybee farmer said they pollinate one quarter of the whole state (Vermont) and that all the guys up north (mostly apples) were talking about the same thing -- no pollinators and specifically no bumblebees.

“Another curiosity this year was the fact that we had very few Japanese beetles. This could be because it was an extremely wet year but it is interesting to note that the beetles and bumblebees both winter underground. Also, when I visited my parents in September in Concord, MA, my mother pointed out how all the oaks had dark spots on them. All our tree leaves have the same spots here in southern Vermont and especially on the beech and quaking aspens. I planted our first berry plants in 2014 so I don’t have a vast wealth of personal experience owning and running a farm but I hope to continue my observations and plan on recreating that experiment with aluminum screening that Katie Haggerty did except with blackcurrants.”

A naturalist in Greece, Diana Kordas, wrote in October from the island of Samos in the eastern Mediterranean:

“I live in the country a few kilometers from the capital town of Samos, Vathi, which sits at the end of a large bay, and opposite the tourist village of Kokkari. In July of this summer, 2021, a pilot 5G cell tower was turned on above Kokkari. This cell tower is across the bay from us, one of its two panels points directly at us, and it is at the same height above sea level as our property. It is approximately 6 kilometers away.

“Where we live we are surrounded by cell towers and boosters (14 total) operating at 2G, 3G, and 4G frequencies. There has been a gradual diminution of insect and bird life in the last few years, especially since 2014, when 4G came here. Many species are affected; we lost the last of the fireflies (we used to have many) two summers ago. It has been years since we had a bug splattered on the windshield of the car as we drove along. But since that 5G cell tower across the bay went live, we have lost nearly all the pollinators and a great deal more besides.

“In the early part of the summer we had a great many pollinators: bumblebees, honeybees, many sorts of wild bees, carpenter bees, wasps of all kinds, and hoverflies. We tend to notice them as we grow all our own fruit and vegetables. Our early summer crops were pollinated without any problem, but melons, tomatoes and courgettes (zucchini) which we planted in early July have produced very little fruit as they did not get many pollinators though there were many blossoms. Not a single courgette has been pollinated and the tomatoes produced only 3 fruits; the melons (not as many as we would have expected) seem to have been pollinated by tiny night-flying moths.

“We own three and a half acres of land, which a big property for the island. It has many large trees (pines, cypresses, carobs, wild pistachio, olives, almonds and a grove of extremely rare gum mastic trees) and some fruit trees (apricots, plums and pears) as well as fields of grasses and wild plants. I should note here that we do not use pesticides of any sort, and we do not have any adjoining neighbours who use any pesticides; also, most of the land surrounding us is wild both up the mountain and down to the sea. Our own land has never had any pesticides and I would say the same is most likely true for most of the land around us. This is NOT a pesticide problem.

“We also keep our land as wild as possible, and except for the plots we cultivate the wild plants are allowed to grow freely: grasses, flowers (many orchids), and a lot of wild fennel. There are many bushes and hedges (I don’t know the English names for these plants). Many of the trees are over 100 years old, and some of the cypresses are over 300 years old.

“When planting we tend to intercrop and also plant flowering basils and zinnias, which attract pollinators, among the other plants. We also put out saucers of water for them to drink from -- bees get thirsty. We usually get lots of bees, butterflies, hoverflies, wasps, etc., of many species, and we had many pollinators until recently. The decline began in July when the tower went live.

“The bees and other pollinators, and indeed most of the insects, are now almost all gone. We know this for several reasons: one is what we see (or don’t see) on the vegetable beds, one is what we are seeing generally (or not seeing, which is hardly anything) and the most important is what we are not seeing on the carob trees. Every year at this time, the male carobs flower abundantly and draw in hundreds of pollinators: bees of all sorts, wasps, hornets and hoverflies. You can’t go anywhere near these trees without being aware of a loud buzzing, and the insects are busy on them all day. These trees bloom for about a month, they are in full flower, and to date there has been virtually nothing on them: one bumblebee, one honeybee, a few hornets, a few flies of different species, a couple of tiny wild bees. We check many times a day, every day.

“This is NOT due to the weather, either. Since the carob trees went into flower we have had a variety of weather patterns, from strong northerly winds to fairly strong southerlies, interspersed with a good many still days. It has rained once. The temperatures are about average for the time of year. Wind or no wind, warm or cool, there are virtually no pollinators on the carobs.

“One day we also checked for bees on every male carob we could find between here and Kokkari, and we couldn’t find any insects on any other flowering carob—or any insects at all, except a few flies.

“The flowering carobs are a good indicator of pollinators because they attract so many. Certain plants are good for this, like traveller’s joy/cat’s claw, a thorny climbing vine which has very sweet-smelling flowers and blooms in this season (we haven’t seen any pollinators on them either) and onion flowers, which will attract every type of wasp and hornet there is (but not bees). We do not have onion flowers at this time, but on past occasions when we have had, we got large numbers of wasps and hornets, including many species we did not recognize.

“On our land, as I write this, we have lost not only bees but all sorts of other insects: beetles of all sorts including cockchafers and ladybirds, web-spinning spiders, mantises, moths and butterflies (we always get great clouds of graylings on the pines in July-August, but hardly any this year), dragonflies of all sorts, grasshoppers and crickets. October is the season for dragonflies, and we presently have the warm, still weather when they arrive in the thousands. This year we have maybe 1/100th of the usual number. We have a few hornets (not nearly as many as usual), horseflies (fewer than usual) and flies (which seem of all the insects to be the least affected).

“We still have mosquitoes, but I believe the reason for this is that they breed in our cistern, which has stone walls two feet thick and a cement roof -- it is protected from electromagnetic fields. The mosquitoes get in through the overflow pipe and tiny gaps in the stones that cover the drain holes. Our neighbour, who has an open-topped cistern, had thousands of mosquito larvae in the water (and a big mosquito problem) earlier in the summer, now has no mosquitoes. I checked, and there are no larvae in the water of his cistern any more.

“I can only think that the 5G cell tower has caused these things to happen, because nothing else accounts for the sudden, severe drop in the number of insects here. The tower went live in July and the losses we are seeing have happened since July. I also think that we are seeing a drop in the number of small rodents: rats, mice and voles. We are not losing fruit and vegetables to mice or rats, which we always do. Also, on a wild bit of land like this, one tends to find traces of them, or to catch tails whisking away in the beam of a torch at night, or to hear them (tree rats can be quite noisy), and it seems they too are gone or going. My neighbour keeps finding dead rats, yet he never poisons them so they didn’t die from that.

“We are also seeing changes in animal behaviour. We feed a number of golden jackals which are having problems hunting due to a lack of wildlife in the area. The bay of Samos is/we are already surrounded by many cell towers and boosters in addition to the new 5G cell tower and wildlife including insects and birds has been declining for years. However, over the past few weeks the number of jackals coming to us has tripled and they are exhibiting symptoms of extreme anxiety, following us around in the evenings and now starting to appear in the daytime as well (they are primarily nocturnal). These are wild animals that we do not treat as pets, but some of them are becoming positively clingy, approaching to within several feet and sitting for periods of time just a few feet away. Some of them, which were not aggressive before, have started to become very aggressive with other jackals and fights are always breaking out.

“The area is also experiencing problems with wild boar, which are also looking for food. We have had several too-close encounters with these large and dangerous animals (which are also appearing at times when they shouldn’t, before sunset) and digging up large portions of our land at night. I was charged by one and so was my husband. Many people are seeing them in daytime, and they have dug up gardens, groves and the sides of the road. This has never happened before.

“Bird numbers are diminishing. We have still got fairly large numbers of great tits and sardinian warblers, which tend to stick to the deep cover of thick hedges and large trees, but we have lost all the chiffchaffs and chaffinches. We have a few blackbirds but it is a long time since we have seen a songthrush, or a wren. The robins have not arrived from further north, though they should have by now. We have a pair of tawny owls but little owls have disappeared. We get jays and crows, a few ring-neck doves (diminishing) and wood-pigeons, which have become few in number lately. Gull numbers (yellow-legged gulls) are falling and the shags which were always on the beach below our land have disappeared entirely. We are getting fewer raptors -- we usually have sparrowhawks, Eleanora’s falcons, goshawks, buzzards and short-toed eagles, but they are avoiding this area now though we see them elsewhere, as well as ravens.

“We have seen virtually no migrating birds in this area this fall: a few flycatchers, a couple of red-backed shrikes, and a flock of Little Gulls flying out to sea is all. We heard but didn’t see a flock of bee-eaters, which didn’t stop here as they usually do.

“In conclusion, cell towers in general have diminished the number of insects and pollinators in this area, along with bird numbers and wildlife generally. The new 5G cell tower has had a devastating effect in a very short time, but it is impossible to know the full consequences until next spring at the earliest.”
_____________

Those of you who remember car windshields splattered with insects, gardens ablaze with butterflies and abuzz with bees, loud choruses of crickets on land, and of frogs in ponds, and thick flocks of songbirds singing their joy at life, will understand what I am about to say. Cell phones are not here to stay. Whether people will willingly give them up is another question.

If people will willingly give up cell phones, the sudden and dramatic improvement in everyone’s health and sense of well-being, and the return of all our lost and disappearing cousin species who are still trying to share the Earth with us, will restore hope to the human species and catalyze other changes that will suddenly become possible, most importantly the ending of the mining and use of fossil fuels, which are converting the oxygen in our air to carbon dioxide, acidifying our oceans, polluting our rivers, lakes, streams and groundwater, and filling oceans, land, atmosphere, and ourselves with particles of plastic.

If people do not willing give up cell phones, then our planet does not have long to live, and cell phones will die with the Earth. In either case, they are not here to stay. Please join me in working toward the restoration of our home. If you have not yet signed it, sign the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space. If your organization has consultation status at the United Nations and has the ability to formally submit this Appeal to the U.N., get in touch with me. If your organization opposes 5G and you have not yet done so, contact me at info@cellphonetaskforce.org about signing the amicus brief supporting our case in the Supreme Court. Please download, save, and distribute Part I, Part II and Part III of this series. If you still own or use a cell phone, please throw it away, now, and if you do not have a landline, get one."

REFERENCES

Anderson, John. “‘Isle of Wight Disease’ in Bees. I.” Bee World 11(4): 37-42 (1930).

Balmori, Alfonso. “Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Tadpole: The City Turned into a Laboratory.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 29: 31-35 (2010).

Bartoniček, Václav and Eliska Klimková-Deutschová. “Effect of Centimeter Waves on Human Biochemistry.” Casopis Lekařů Ceskych 103(1): 26-30 (in Czech). English Translation in G. L. Khazan, ed., Biological Effects of Microwaves, ATD Report P-65-68, September 17, 1965 (Washington, DC: Dept. of Commerce), pp. 13-14 (1964).

Bawin, S.M. and W. Ross Adey. “Sensitivity of Calcium Binding in Cerebral Tissue to Weak Environmental Electric Fields Oscillating at Low Frequency.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 73(6): 1999-2003 (1976).

Belokrinitskiy, Vasily S. “Hygienic Evaluation of Biological Effects of Nonionizing Microwaves.” Gigiyena i Sanitariya 1982(6): 32-34. JPRS 81865, pp. 1-5 (1982).

Bigu del Blanco, Jaime. Interaction of Electromagnetic Fields and Living Systems with Special Reference to Birds. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-113, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

Bigu del Blanco, Jaime and César Romero-Sierra. Bird Feathers as Dielectric Receptors of Microwave Radiation. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-89, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

Blackman, Carl F., S.G. Benane, J.A. Elder, D.E. House, J.A. Lampe, and J.M. Faulk. “Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation.” Bioelectromagnetics 1:35-43 (1980).

Blackman, Carl F. “Radiobiological approaches to electropollution.” In Biological Effects of Electropollution, S. Dutta and R. Millis, eds., Information Ventures, Phila., 1986, pp. 39-46.

Brodeur, Paul. The Zapping of America. New York: W.W. Norton (1977).

Clarke, Dominic, Heather Whitney, Gregory Sutton, and Daniel Robert. “Detection and Learning of Floral Electric Fields by Bumblebees.” Science 340: 66-69 (2013).

Clarke, Dominic, Erica Morley, and Daniel Robert. “The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception.” Journal of Comparative Physiology A 203: 737-748 (2017).

Dutta, S. et al. :Microwave radiation-induced calcium ion flux from human neuroblastoma cells: dependence on depth of amplitude modulation and exposure time.” In Biological Effects of Electropollution, S. Dutta and R. Millis, eds. Information Ventures, Phila., 1986, pp. 63-69.

Edwards, G. S., C. C. Davis, J. D. Saffer, and M. L. Swicord. “Microwave Field-Driven Acoustic Modes in DNA.” Biophysical Journal 47: 799-807 (1985).

Engels, Svenja, Nils-Lasse Schneider, Nele Lefeldt, Christine Maira Hein, Manuela Zapka, Andreas Michalik, Dana Elbers, Achim Kittel, P. J. Hore, and Henrik Mouritsen. “Anthropogenic Electromagnetic Noise Disrupts Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Migratory Bird.” Nature 509: 353-56 (2014).

Fink, Hans-Werner and Christian Schönenberger. “Electrical Conduction through DNA Molecules.” Nature 398: 407-410 (1999).

Frey, Allan H. “Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency Energy.” Aerospace Medicine 32: 1140-42 (1961).

Frey, Allan H. “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy.” Journal of Applied Physiology 17(4): 689-92 (1962).

Frey, Allan H. and Elwood Seifert. “Pulse Modulated UHF Energy Illumination of the Heart Associated with Change in Heart Rate.” Life Sciences 7 (part 2): 505-12 (1968).

Frey, Allan H. and Rodman Messenger, Jr. “Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy.” Science 181: 356-58 (1973).

Frey, Allan H., Sondra Feld, and Barbara Frey. “Neural Function and Behavior: Defining the Relationship.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247: 433-39 (1975).

Frey, Allan H. “Is a Toxicology Model Appropriate as a Guide for Biological Research with Electromagnetic Fields?” Journal of Bioelectricity 9(2): 233-234 (1990).

Gel'fon, I.A. and Sadchikova, M.N. “Protein fractions and histamine of the blood under the influence of UHF and HF.” In The Biological Action of Ultrahigh Frequencies, A.A. Letavet and Z.V. Gordon, eds., Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow. JPRS 12471, pp. 42-46 (1960).

Glaser, Zorach R. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation. Bethesda, MD: Naval Medical Research Institute. NTIS reports nos. AD 734391, AD 750271, AD 770621, AD 784007, AD A015622, AD A025354, and AD A029430 (1971-1976).

Glaser, Zorach R. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation: Ninth Supplement to Bibliography of Microwave and RF Biologic Effects. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NTIS report no. PB83176537 (1977).

Greggers, Uwe, Gesche Koch, Viola Schmidt, et al. “Reception and Learning of Electric Fields in Bees.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280: 20130528 (2013).

Haggerty, Katie. “Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen Seedlings: Preliminary Observations.” International Journal of Forestry Research, article ID 836278 (2010).

Hallowell, C. “Trouble in the Lily Pads.” Time, Oct. 28, 1996, p. 87.

Hawk, Kathy. Case Study in the Heartland. Butler, PA, 1996.

Holtze, Christian, R. Sivaramakrishnan, Markus Antonietti, J. Tsuwi, Friedrich Kremer, and Klaus D. Kramer. “The microwave absorption of emulsions containing aqueous micro- and nanodroplets: A means to optimize microwave heating.” Colloid and Interface Science 302: 651-657 (2006).

Imms, Augustus D. “Report on a Disease of Bees in the Isle of Wight.” Journal of the Board of Agriculture 14(3): 129-40 (1907).

Koh, K.H., C Montgomery, D Clarke, EL Morley and D Robert. “Bumble Bee Hair Motion in Electric Fields.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1322: 012001 (2019).

Kordas, Diana. Comment to US Fish and Wildlife Service Concerning the Effects of a 5G Cell Tower on the Island of Samos. October 13, 2021.

Kordas, Diana. “Birds and Trees of Northern Greece: Population Declines since the Advent of 4G Wireless An Observational Study.” Oct. 5, 2017, 26 pages.

Kunjilwar, K.K. and Jitendra Behari. “Effect of amplitude-modulated RF radiation on cholinergic system of developing rats.” Brain Research 601:321-324 (1993).

Margaritis, Lukas H., Areti K. Manta, Konstantinos D. Kokkaliaris, et al. “Drosophila Oogenesis as a Bio-marker Responding to EMF Sources.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 33(3): 165-189 (2014).

Microwave News. “Industry Pressures FCC to Adopt ANSI RF/MW Exposure Standard.” March/April 1996, pp. 1, 11-12.

Microwave News. “Highlights.” May/June 1995, p. 12.

Moore, Julie L., indexer. Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation, compiled by Zorach R. Glaser. Riverside, CA: Julie Moore & Associates (1984).

Navakatikian, Mikhail A. and Lyudmila A. Tomashevskaya. “Phasic Behavioral and Endocrine Effects of Microwaves of Nonthermal Intensity.” In: David O. Carpenter and Sinerik Ayrapetyan, eds., Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields (New York: Academic), vol. 1, pp. 333-42 (1994).

Nieh, James C. “The Stop Signal of Honey Bees: Reconsidering Its Message.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33(1): 51-56 (1993).

Nikitina, Valentina N. 2001. “Hygienic, Clinical and Epidemiological Analysis of Disturbances Induced by Radio Frequency EMF Exposure in Human Body.” In Kjell Hansson Mild, Monica Sandstrom, and Eugene Lyskov, eds., Clinical and Physiological Investigations of People Highly Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields (Umeå, Sweden: National Institute for Working life), Arbetslivsrapport 3, pp. 32-38 (2001).

Nittby, Henrietta, Gustav Grafström, Dong Ping Tian, Lars Malmgren, Arne Brun, Bertil R.R. Persson, Leif G. Salford, and Jacob Eberhardt. “Cognitive Impairment in Rats after Long-Term Exposure to GSM-900 Mobile Phone Radiation.” Bioelectromagnetics 29: 219-232 (2008).

Paffhausen, Benjamin H., Julian Petrasch, Uwe Greggers, et al. “The Electronic Bee Spy: Eavesdropping on Honeybee Communication via Electrostatic Field Recordings.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 15: 647224 (2021).

Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. “Effect of Microwave Exposure on the Ovarian Development of Drosophila melanogaster.” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 63: 121-132 (2012).

Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. “Analyzing the Health Impacts of Modern Telecommunications Microwaves.” In Advances in Medicine and Biology, Leon V. Berhardt, ed., Nova Science Publishers, NY, Vol. 17, pp. 1-55 (2011).

Panagopoulos, Dimitris J., Evangelia D. Chavdoula, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Bioeffects of Mobile Telephony Radiation in Relation to Its Intensity or Distance from the Antenna.” International Journal of Radiation Biology 86(5): 345-357 (2010).

Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Mobile Telephony Radiation Effects on Living Organisms.” In Mobile Telephones, Networks, Applications, and Performance, A.C. Harper and R.V. Buress, eds., Nova Science Publishers, NY, pp. 107-149 (2008).

Panagopoulos, Dimitris J., Andreas Karabarbounis, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Effect of GSM 900-MHz Mobile Phone Radiation on the Reproductive Capacity of Drosophila melanogaster.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 23(1): 29-43 (2004).

Persson, Bertil R. R., Leif G. Salford, and Arne Brun. “Blood-brain Barrier Permeability in Rats Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields Used in Wireless Communication.” Wireless Networks 3: 455-61 (1997).

Phillips, Ernest F. “The Status of Isle of Wight Disease in Various Countries.” Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 391-95 (1925).

Polk, Charles. “Implications of Measured Electric Conductivity of DNA for Bio-effects of E.M. Fields.” In Bioelectromagnetics Society Annual Meeting, June 9-16, 2000, München, Germany, Abstracts book, pp. 22-23.

Raumer, Max. “Heisse Gespräche.” ZEIT Wissen, May 2006, https://www.zeit.de/zeit-wissen/2006/05/Handy-Strahlung.xml/komplettansicht.

Romero-Sierra, César, Arthur O. Quanbury, and J. Alan Tanner. Feathers as Microwave and Infra-Red Filters and Detectors — Preliminary Experiments. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-40, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1970).

Sadchikova, Maria N. “Clinical manifestations of reactions to microwave irradiation in various occupational groups.” In Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18 Oct., 1973, P. Czerski et al., eds., pp. 261-267 (1974).

Saglioglou, Niki E., Areti K. Manta, Ioannis K. Giannarakis, Aikaterini S. Skouroliakou, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Apopoptic Cell Death during Drosophila Oogenesis Is Differentially Increased by Electromagnetic Radiation Depending on Modulation, Intensity and Duration of Exposure.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 35(1): 40-53 (2014).

Sagripanti, Jose-Luis and Mays L. Swicord. “DNA Structural Changes Caused by Microwave Radiation.” International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine 50(1): 47-50 (1986).

Sagripanti, Jose-Luis, Mays L. Swicord, and C. C. Davis. “Microwave Effects on Plasmid DNA.” Radiation Research 110(2): 219-231 (1987).

Salford, Leif G., Arne E. Brun, Jacob L. Eberhardt, Lars Malmgren, and Bertil R.R. Persson. “Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111(7): 881-83 (2003).

Salford, Leif G., Bertil Persson, Jacob Eberhardt, Gustav Grafström, and Lars Malmgren. “Non-thermal Effects of EMF upon the Mammalian Brain.” Abstract for a presentation made at an international conference titled The Precautionary EMF Approach: Rationale, Legislation and Implementation, Benevento, Italy, February 2006.

Schwartz, Jean-Louis, Dennis E. House, and Geoffrey A.R. Mealing. “Exposure of Frog Hearts to CW or Amplitude-Modulated VHF Fields: Selective Efflux of Calcium Ions at 16 Hz.” Bioelectromagnetics 11: 349-358 (1990).

Serant, Claire. “A Human Science Experiment.” New York Newsday, May 10, 2004.

Sikorski, M. and J. Bielski. “Disturbances of glucose tolerance in workers exposed to electromagnetic radiation.” Medycyna Pracy 47(3) 227-231 (1996) (in Polish).

Souder, William. “An Amphibian Horror Story.” New York Newsday, Oct. 15, 1996, pp. B19, B21.

Souder, William. “Deformed Frogs Show Rift Among Scientists.” Houston Chonicle, Nov. 5, 1997, p. 4A.

Stern, John. “Space Aliens Stealing Our Frogs.” Weekly World News, Apri 17, 1990, p. 21.

Sutton, Gregory P., Dominic Clarke, Erica L. Morley, and Daniel Robert. “Mechanosensory hairs in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) detect weak electric fields.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(26): 7261–7265 (2016).

Swicord, Mays L. “Chain-Length-Dependent Microwave Absorption of DNA.” Biopolymers 22: 2513-2516 (1983).

Syngayevskaya, V. A. 1970. “Metabolic Changes.” In I. R. Petrov, ed., Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Organism of Man and Animals (Leningrad: “Meditsina”), in English translation, 1972 (Washington, DC: NASA), report no. TTF-708, pp. 48-60 (1970).

Tanner, J. Allan. “Effects of Microwave Radiation on Birds.” Nature 210: 636 (1966).

Tanner, J. Alan and César Romero-Sierra. “Bird Feathers as Sensory Detectors of Microwave Fields.” In: Stephen F. Cleary, ed., Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation. Symposium Proceedings (Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare), Publication BRH/DBE 70-2, pp. 185-87 (1970).

Tanner, J. Alan, Jamie Bigue del Blanco, and César Romero-Sierra. Bird Feathers as Dielectric Receptors of Microwave Radiation. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-89, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

Tanner, J. Alan and César Romero-Sierra. “The Effects of Chronic Exposure to Very Low Intensity Microwave Radiation on Domestic Fowl.” Journal of Bioelectricity 1(2): 195-205 (1982).

Trovato, E. Ramona, Director, Division of Radiation and Indoor Air, Environmental Protection Agency. Letter to Federal Communications Commission (June 19, 1995).

Underwood, Robyn M. and Dennis vanEngelsdorp. “Colony Collapse Disorder: Have We Seen This Before?” Bee Culture 35(7): 13-18 (2007).

United States General Accounting Office. Efforts By The Environmental Protection Agency To Protect The Public From Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures. CED-78-79, B-166506 (March 29, 1978).

United States Senate, Committee on Appropriations, 104th Congress. Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Bill, Report No. 104-140 (September 5, 1995).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Federal Radiation Protection Guidance; Proposed Alternatives for Controlling Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation.” Notice of Proposed Recommendations, Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 146, pp. 27318-27339 (July 30, 1986).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Federal Radiation Protection Guidance for Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation,” ARP-FRL-2245-6. Advanced Notice of Proposed Recommendation, Federal Register, Vol. 47, pp. 57338-57440 (Dec. 23, 1982).

vanEngelsdorp, Dennis, Jay D. Evans, Claude Saegerman, Chris Mullin, Eric Haubruge, Bach Kim Nguyen, Maryann Frazier, Jim Frazier, Diana Cox-Foster, Yanping Chen, Robyn Underwood, David R. Tarpy, and Jeffery S. Pettis. “Colony Collapse Disorder: A Descriptive Study.” PLoS ONE 4(8): e6481 (2009).

Vogt, Amanda. “Mutant Frogs Spark a Mega Mystery.” Chicago Tribune, August 4, 1998, sec. 7, p. 3.

Warnke, Ulrich. Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by “Elektrosmog” (Bienen, Vögel und Menschen: Die Zerstörung der Natur durch ‚Elektrosmog'). Kompetenzinitiative, Stuttgart, Germany (German edition 2007; English edition 2009).

Watson, Traci. “Frogs Falling Silent across USA.” USA Today, August 12, 1998, p. 3A.

Wilson, William T. and Diana M. Menapace. “Disappearing Disease of Honey Bees: A Survey of the United States.” American Bee Journal, February, pp. 118-19; March, pp. 184-86, 217 (1979).

Zaret, Milton M. Investigation of Personnel Hazard Associated with Radio-Frequency Fields Encountered in Naval Operations. Office of Naval Research, Contract No. N00014-69-C-0358, ONR Identification No. NR 101-765. Dept. of the Navy, Arlington, Virginia (1971).

Zaret, Milton M. Hearings before the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session on Public Law 90-602, Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968, Serial No. 93-24, pp. 100-113. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office (1973).

Zaret, Milton M. “Cataracts Following Use of Microwave Ovens.” New York State Journal of Medicine 74(11): 2032-2048 (1974).

Zaret, Milton M. “Selected cases of microwave cataract in man associated with concomitant annotated pathologies.” In Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18 Oct., 1973, P. Czerski et al., eds., pp. 294-301 (1974).

Zaret, Milton M. “Blindness, Deafness and Vestibular Dysfunction in a Microwave Worker.” The Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Monthly 54: 291 (1975).

onawah

28th November 2021, 18:34

Do you want your tax money used to deploy 5G?
11/28/21
Today's email update from: Americans for Responsible Technology <info@americansforresponsibletech.org> via gmail.mcsv.net
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/LpKJR6gMasT4pm6IEjPPw8wE9TlgVJlxvU8iGivgaoTTm5P2Y8yWTt0iadc7l5MgrG8CiOYJRsixiCtFBsJSk8BEefPGqABe8MmU a-ZlIm1U6Cwa018XZcZQTwj-DeSQfoLbtysjFkqSOJdcto9tqpldOC96_g=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b/images/5915194d-cc52-43be-93fe-b4d06a800165.png

"Do you want your tax money used to deploy 5G?
Because of ONE word in the new infrastructure bill, all taxpayer-funded broadband projects must support the deployment of 5G! That needs to change!

Section 60102 (a) (2) I (ii) (II) of the new infrastructure bill requires all new broadband projects to "support the deployment of 5G" to qualify for federal funding.
We've uncovered an outrageous provision of the new infrastructure bill -– one that needs to be fixed, and the sooner the better.

The intent of Congress was to help close the digital divide by providing billions of dollars for broadband projects, including both wired and wireless projects. Wired broadband is faster, cheaper, safer, more reliable, less susceptible to hacking and much more energy efficient than wireless.

But lobbyists for the wireless industry snuck a phrase into the 1036 page bill that requires any federally-funded broadband project to support the deployment of 5G. Wait, what?

It's a naked demonstration of telecom influence in Congress and an insult to every family in underserved communities who desperately need cost-effective broadband, not slow, expensive, unreliable, hackable, energy-guzzling wireless broadband.
So, we need a one-word fix:

Bad law: "...Support the deployment of 5G, successor wireless technologies, and other advanced services."

Better law: "...Support the deployment of 5G, successor wireless technologies or other advanced services."

There is only one way to fix this:
Congress needs to act!

Today, please take a minute to email your representatives in Washington and ask them to "Fix the 5G Mistake."

And why not forward this message to a few friends?
Sample email:

Dear (name of legislator),

I'm writing about one word in the infrastructure bill, HR 3684.

As written, Sec. 60102 (a) (2) I (ii) (II) requires that all broadband projects must "support the deployment of 5G" to be eligible for federal funding. So, for instance, projects that provide low-cost wired community broadband connections can't be funded.

I'm sure you would never knowingly support that kind of language. After all, everyone knows that wired broadband connections are faster, cheaper, safer, more reliable, less susceptible to hacking and much more energy efficient than wireless. Wired broadband is how we fix the digital divide for good!

So we need to fix the law. The fourth word from the end of that section needs to be changed from "and" to "or."

This simple change that would reinstate the will of Congress, help close the digital divide, and prevent billions of taxpayer dollars from becoming a windfall for the wireless industry.

Please let me know you received this message and what action you plan to take.

Thank you!

Find your federal representatives
https://myreps.datamade.us/index.html

And while we're talking 5G.....

Don't let any municipal official tell you that their "hands are tied" with regard to the deployment of 5G. The fact is that Congress gave local governments plenty of control over deployment, but local governments have to pro-actively take that power through smart planning provisions in their local codes.

Please read, download and share our new Advisory Bulletin on the powers local governments have to control deployment of 5G.

Download the new Advisory Bulletin from the ART Tool Kit
https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/tool-kit

This message is brought to you by Americans for Responsible Technology (ART), a non-profit coalition of grassroots organizations across the country supporting the deployment of safe, economical and future-proof wired technology. We are deeply grateful for your financial support. "

norman

3rd December 2021, 23:54

Matt Landman talks to Freeman about many of the aspects of the current situation but from around 35 - 40 minutes into this he has some startling things to say about 5G.

He produces Faraday bags for people to put their phones in to stop all signal activity. He first produced single layer bags. They worked for a while but eventually growing numbers of customers reported that the bags were not working any more, signals were passing through them. After collecting a lot of these reports he switched to producing double layer bags. That fixed the problem, for a while. Then he started getting reports from customers that even the double layer bags were failing.

His hypothesis is that the signals are being ramped up in strength.

This conversation ranges around a bit and he's a bright fella with intelligent thought tracking of his and Freeman's observations throughout the entire covid event. As worrying as some of their observations are, I felt quite relieved to listen to someone speak with such a well joined up thinking thing going on in his head, rather than slice things away into tightly isolated topics in a mental library stripping out all the dot joinability of the primary observations in the first place.

A very worthwhile hour of podcast listening.

https://freemantv.com/preparing-for-the-great-reset-matt-landman/

DaveToo

4th December 2021, 00:15

Matt Landman talks to Freeman about many of the aspects of the current situation but from around 35 - 40 minutes into this he has some startling things to say about 5G.

He produces Faraday bags for people to put their phones in to stop all signal activity. He first produced single layer bags. They worked for a while but eventually growing numbers of customers reported that the bags were not working any more, signals were passing through them. After collecting a lot of these reports he switched to producing double layer bags. That fixed the problem, for a while. Then he started getting reports from customers that even the double layer bags were failing.

His hypothesis is that the signals are being ramped up in strength.

This conversation ranges around a bit and he's a bright fella with intelligent thought tracking of his and Freeman's observations throughout the entire covid event. As worrying as some of their observations are, I felt quite relieved to listen to someone speak with such a well joined up thinking thing going on in his head, rather than slice things away into tightly isolated topics in a mental library stripping out all the dot joinability of the primary observations in the first place.

A very worthwhile hour of podcast listening.

He's just playing into their system.
You don't produce Faraday bags for your phones.
You stop using them (phones) period!
And stop getting jabbed!

No phones (and no one getting jabbed) no one to control, no use for 5G towers.

Shadowman

5th December 2021, 11:15

Dears,
We are exposed to EMF for generations.
1. Telecommunication:
has very strict EMF control, installed even outdoors so that it is not affecting the human body. Indoors regulations sometimes are so high, that it is hard to get the coverage with indoor antennas. 2G/3G/4G/5G, the same, if we have all of them on the site, they are summed. The higher ‘G’ the less is transmitter power.
next generation step means more effective spectrum usage; 5G is the same Hertz as Wi-Fi, but technically, it has better performance for moving objects, better latency and it is telecom;
a microwave oven is in the same spectrum and is more dangerous near to you making dinner hot.
2. Wi-Fi is already mentioned, it is all around indoors competing telecom for data users.
3. Industry. Mining is going deeper and getting more dangerous, breaking the boarders of human safety regulations. We send 250 ton vehicles, carrying 250 of ore more on itself without, fully autonomous without any humans to be in danger. Thanks to 5G technology.

All the wireless coverage providers go through the path of regulations and restrictions before making a new roll out and they have to pass the checks.
5G transmitters will reuse 4G sites and even make the EMF less with more efficient technology replacement.

It is the responsibility of every one habits, life style and comfort zones.
Nice to sit in a warm house watching the cold outside and sending messages, using wi-fi, while my 4G mobile gets calls and my bath gets warm.

Hi Larliss,

Have you read "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg? It refutes your assertions referencing detailed scientific studies, footnotes and a comprehensive bibliography. If you can't find it online PM me.

Here is a recent paper you may find interesting;

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/

Very strict EMF safety control? Please feel free to cite any studies or research papers looking into non-ionizing WCR (wireless communications radiation) effects on biology,
showing that it is safe. The paper linked above references decades of peer reviewed science papers showing that it is quite the opposite.

The short video below addresses this point rather succinctly;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w

Ernie Nemeth

5th December 2021, 11:23

This is the truth as far as the industry is concerned: 'It does not matter what the health effects are because we are going to implement 5G irregardless anyway.'

norman

6th December 2021, 01:30

This is the truth as far as the industry is concerned: 'It does not matter what the health effects are because we are going to implement 5G irregardless anyway.'

Unless there's a miracle, we're going through a 'destruction test'. They don't care how many of us they turn into smoke and ashes while they whittle us down to a remaining small cluster that match their desired tick list of attributes on their mad genius wish list.

These bastards, typical faux scientists, are brilliant at focusing in on a conjured objective, in absolute denial, or is it ignorance, of their 359.999 degree blind spot.

If only 1 percent of us prove to be resilient to the insane amount of abuse they intend to inflict upon us, they will cheer and celebrate that they have done a wonderful thing.

ExomatrixTV

11th December 2021, 15:52

Activated by 5G Pulsed Microwave Radiation?

https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/nano-bloed-570x360-0.jpg?resize=700%2C441

Is there graphene in the Corona vaccines and are they active by the 5G frequencies? factchecknederland.afp.com (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://factchecknederland.afp.com/http%25253A%25252F%25252Fdoc.afp.com%25252F9F63FK-1)This is very quickly contradicted. The saying goes: where there is smoke, there is fire (=where there are rumors of wrongdoing, there must be something wrong)

Sources of ionizing radiation

Ionizing radiation is naturally present, but can also come from artificial sources. Radiation from natural sources is called background radiation.

Radiation from natural sources

-Cosmic rays from the universe. Cosmic rays come from the sun and from sources outside the solar system. At high altitudes, cosmic rays are less shielded by the atmosphere;

-Radiation from the bottom. Radiation from the soil is called terrestrial radiation. It is emitted by certain minerals in the soil. A radioactive noble gas, radon, is also released from the soil into the air that we breathe. The amount of radiation from the soil and the amount of radon is low in the Netherlands. This has to do with the favorable soil type in the Netherlands.

Radiation from artificial sources

-Medical care. During medical examinations, people may be briefly exposed to radiation. For example, if the dentist makes X-rays of the teeth. Such a low dose of radiation is not dangerous. Sometimes radiation is deliberately applied, for example in radiotherapy with radioactive isotopes in breast cancer or prostate cancer. The radiologist ensures an optimal consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of applying radiation;

-Industry. Industry uses radiation, eg nuclear installations to generate energy (nuclear power plants) and nuclear research reactors to produce isotopes for industrial and medical applications, also use radioactivity.

https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Elektromagnetisch_spectrum.jpg?resize=700%2C268

Effects on humans

Ionizing radiation can cause damage to tissues, and DNA autoriteitnvs.nl/onderwerpen/straling/ioniserende-straling-bronnen-en-effecten (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.autoriteitnvs.nl/onderwerpen/straling/ioniserende-straling-bronnen-en-effecten)

The fifth column

The fifth column or LA QUINTA COLOMNA is a free thought movement founded by Ricardo Delgado Martin. Graduated in statistics from the University of Seville (Spain). Measurements with analog Geiger counters* have ended up at La Quinta and it appears that ionizing radiation has been measured around 5G antennas. Together with Dr. José Luis Sevilla has Ricardo Delgado's thoughts on this. Indeed, a 5G antenna is supposed to emit non-ionizing radiation, as the Telecom providers say, and yet Geiger counters reveal that these antennas emit ionizing radiation.

straalsleed.nl/blog/ Makes-5g- Use-of-ionizing-Railing (https://stralingsleed-nl.translate.goog/blog/maakt-5g-gebruik-van-ioniserende-straling/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en)

*The Geiger counter (also called Geiger-Müller counter, Geiger-Müllertel tube, GM tube or GM counter) is a radiation detector that can be used to measure ionizing radiation.

Ionizing radiation from UV light

Ultraviolet (abbreviated UV, also called ultraviolet radiation, black light or UV light) is electromagnetic radiation after visible light. The wavelength after visible light is becoming shorter and more energetic. With regard to the effects of ultraviolet light on humans and the environment, a distinction is made between;

-UV A. Uv A is ultraviolet radiation with a wavelength between approximately 315 and 400 nm,
-UV B. Uv B has a wavelength between 280 and 315 nm
-UV C. Uv C has a wavelength between 100 and 280 nm (“ short-wave radiation").

Radiation with a shorter wavelength (between 10 and 100 nm) does not fall in the UV spectrum, but belongs to the so-called soft X-rays. This is where (on paper) the ionizing radiation starts!

https://i2.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Grafeen-0.jpg?resize=700%2C455

Graphene or 'nano chicken wire'

Among the theories that have been put forward, there is the possibility that the graphene in the environment (dispersed by chemtrails) is being stimulated by the non-ionizing waves emitted by the 5G antennas. It is also possible that the antennas themselves have graphene plates or something similar in their structure that multiply the signal so that it comes within the ionization range. Graphene is a layer of carbon atoms packed in the form of contiguous hexagons, such as a honeycomb. The material is extremely thin, virtually transparent, extremely flexible and much stronger than, for example, steel. Graphene could make the internet a hundred times faster and a camera sensor a thousand times more sensitive. Its appearance is determined by the way the carbon atoms are arranged. These atoms form hexagons,making graphene look like a honeycomb or chicken wire under a very strong microscope. Graphene is therefore sometimes jokingly referred to as 'nano chicken wire' nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/grafeen (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/grafeen/)

Graphene

Oxide Graphene oxide (GO) is the oxidized form of tombstone. That is, graphene functionalized with groups containing oxygen.

'Graphene nanotubes in Corona vaccines are activated by 5G frequencies and change brain processes'

The latest developments and discoveries with regard to graphene (oxide), and the major role that this substance seems to play in the construction of the 'operating system' that is under the guise of 'Covid-19 vaccines' will be injected into people step-by-step, so that everyone will be unsuspectingly integrated with a global Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) controlled 5G/6G network.

* Artificial intelligence (AI) (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?102409-A.I.-is-Progressing-Faster-Than-You-Think-) is the foundation for mimicking human intelligence by creating and applying algorithms built into a dynamic computing environment. Simply put, AI attempts to make computers think and react as if they were humans.

The major news media still claims that a link between graphene (oxide) and Covid-19 is an unproven 'conspiracy theory', but nothing could be further from the truth. The Spanish company Graphena produces various materials and chips made of graphene and in March 2020 the company offered free graphene for the 'treatment of Covid-19'.
The EU is funding the overarching Graphene Flagship graphene-flagship.eu (http://graphene-flagship.eu) with € 1 billion , to which various Dutch universities are also affiliated. And Graphene Flagship launched a special 'Covid-19 Task Force'. It investigated how the body could be 'protected' with graphene and how the material could be used to make society 'Covid-resistant'.

Graphene oxide discovered in Pfizer vaccines

In Spain, university researchers recently discovered that the Pfizer vaccine contains a very high concentration of graphene oxide (coronazwendel.nl/2021/07/05/spaanse-universitaire-spreis-ontdekken-grafeenoxide-nanoparticles- in-pfizer-vaccin-xandernieuws/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.coronazwendel.nl/2021/07/05/spaanse-universitaire-wetenschappers-ontdekken-grafeenoxide-nanodeeltjes-in-pfizer-vaccin-xandernieuws/) and groningerkrant.nl/opinie/column-sars-cov-2-feitelijk-grafeenoxidetoxic/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://groningerkrant.nl/opinie/column-sars-cov-2-feitelijk-grafeenoxidevergiftiging/) ). This was confirmed in at least two other studies.

However, it is still unclear whether Pfizer has added graphene oxide in all batches worldwide. Since the vaccine manufacturers have officially been given complete free rein by the politicians to carry out these medical gene manipulation experiments on humanity, it is theoretically conceivable that in other countries there is no graphene oxide in the injections, but perhaps something else has been added that is not on the package inserts. will be mentioned. Further research into other batches is therefore urgently needed.

(Under the post-WWII Nuremberg Code agreed upon, medical experiments without fully informing recipients and expressly requesting their consent is a very serious crime against humanity for which military tribunals may hand out the death penalty.)

Graphene oxide nanotubes attach themselves to our brain

Riccardo Delgado (presenter of the online program LA QUINTA COLOMNA) and Dr Jose Luis Sevillano (GP) analyzed the now established and undeniable electromagnetism that arises in many people after they have been vaccinated. This effect is called magnetofection. Graphene has (electro-) magnetic properties, and in 2013 it was shown that the magnetism in graphene can be switched 'on' and 'off'. Delgado and Sevillano found that graphene oxide nanotubes in the injections adhere to synapses in the brain. In the study published by ScienceDirect https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32082970/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32082970/) (2019) has already mentioned 'nanotubes' with which medicines (and therefore also 'vaccines') can be introduced into the body, which can also 'make a link with neurons and neuronal networks' in the brain.

Riccardo Delgado: “It is possible to use the carbon nanotubes to create antennas for wireless communication at gigahertz (GHz) and terahertz (THz) wavelength (5G) and thus make people a willful victim. A human-robot! http://straalsleed.nl/blog/de-mens-voor-de-helft-een-computer-is-dit-de-toekomst/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://stralingsleed.nl/blog/de-mens-voor-de-helft-een-computer-is-dit-de-toekomst/)

Graphene nanoparticles self-assemble under the influence of EM fields.

A study by Rice University (Houston) shows that electric fields generated with Tesla coils can transfer energy to graphene nanoparticles, allowing them to act as a miniature power source, but above all to self-assemble in new, longer shapes. The 'behaviour' of graphene nanoparticles can therefore in principle be influenced from a distance by means of electric fields. (Remember in this context that it is the intention that not only every street, but probably also every home, gets its own 5G antenna).

Graphene nanoparticles are not only sensitive to these types of electric fields, but can also serve as antennas for electromagnetic fields in the 5G and 6G range. In a study with human fibroblasts (cells found in our connective tissue) to which graphene nanoparticles had been added, exposure to electromagnetic radiation at frequencies of 900, 2400 or 7500 MHz (say 4G and 5G range) was shown to induce cell death.

Human/robot

The brain then becomes a receiver, but of what? Messages and instructions that give off or cause a certain stimulus, reaction, feeling or thought? Who hand out a reward or punishment? Do those people activate to do something, or make them immobile? Those people show or hear something that is not really there? That erase existing memories and knowledge, and implant false memories and knowledge? With 5G / 6G this is technically possible.

Total permanent control over all people now very close?

So the possibilities for brain and behavioral manipulation will soon be literally limitless? With that, the great dream of all dictatorships finally comes true: TOTAL permanent control over ALL people, even over their behavior, their thoughts, their wishes and their desires? As a working person, do we have a choice to refuse the vaccination?

herstelrepublic.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/alarm-you-become-radioactive-irradiated-everywhere/#more-77668
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://herstelderepubliek.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/alarm-u-wordt-radioactief-bestraald-overal/%23more-77668)mcbspecials.eu/nl/blog/grapheen
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.mcbspecials.eu/nl/blog/grafeen)coronazwendel.nl/2021/08/13/grapheen-nanotubes-in-vaccins-worden-door-5g-frequencies-active-en-veranderen-hersenkoppen-xandernieuws/
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.coronazwendel.nl/2021/08/13/grafeen-nanobuisjes-in-vaccins-worden-door-5g-frequenties-actief-en-veranderen-hersenprocessen-xandernieuws/)https://herstelderepublic.wordpress.com/2021 /07/17/covid-vaccine-inserting-receiving-antennas-let's-watch-what-is-happening-in-your-brain/
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://herstelderepubliek.wordpress.com/2021/07/17/covid-vaccin-het-inbrengen-van-ontvangst-antennes-eens-even-kijken-wat-er-in-uw-hersenen-gebeurt/) Photographer AlexanderAlUS via CC BY-SA 3.0
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graphen.jpg) Photo wavelengths in nanometers : examenoverzicht.nl/natuurkunde/licht
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.examenoverzicht.nl/natuurkunde/licht) Photo; icthealth.nl/blog/nano-vaccins-en-medicijncouriers-klein-maar-fijn/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.icthealth.nl/blog/nano-vaccins-en-medicijnkoeriers-klein-maar-fijn/)

source (https://stralingsleed.nl/blog/geactiveerd-door-5g)

JackMcThorn

16th December 2021, 14:59

onawah

17th January 2022, 01:04

LA QUINTA COLUMNA 1-ON-1: SPANISH RESEARCHER FIRST TO REVEAL GRAPHENE OXIDE
1/15/22
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/la-quinta-columna-1-on-1-spanish-researcher-first-to-reveal-graphene-oxide/

"Biostatistician Dr Ricardo Delgado of the La Quinta Columna dissident research group from Spain joins Stew Peters to discuss the contents of the vaxxine vials.

La Quinta Columna was the first group to report graphene oxide, which Dr Delgado says amplifies 5G signals within the body, from gigahertz to terahertz, which he thinks, in turn powers their self-assembly into the microchips, which are also found in the vaccine, over time.

Dr Delgado says that vaccinated people therefore emit lots of radiation and that an aspect of the “shedding” phenomenon, whereby unvaccinated people are made ill in the presence of those who are vaccinated has to do with these high levels of radiation.

He says that classic COVID symptoms match those described in the scientific literature as symptoms of radiation exposure. He does not believe the virus is real and notes that it has never been isolated from a human body.

He believes COVID symptoms are largely a result of the new 5G signals that are starting to come online all over the world. These fields can sicken the unvaccinated but their effect on the vaccinated is to make them even sicker.

Stew tells him about his recent bout with what was diagnosed as COVID and how he was treated with ivermectin and other alternative medications, which he says helped him. He asks Dr Delgado if COVID isn’t real, then how could these medications help him if what he was actually suffering from was radiation exposure?

Dr Delgado responds that many of these medications have the effect of bringing oxygen into the cells and they also support the immune system, which has been triggered by the radiation.

When asked if he his found anything like what Dr Carrie Madej and others have reported; of parasites and other biological life in the vials, Dr Delgado replies that he believes that these are synthetic biology, not actual living organisms.

He says his group hasn’t yet identified everything in the vials but they have been able to positively identify some things, such as micro antennae and micro routers, which he believes are what cause some of the vaccinated to emit MAC addresses.

Way back in mid-2015, I first began reporting on the videos of Level9News, which described plans by proponents of global governance at the World Economic Forum and the Bilderberg Group (both of which are headed by Klaus Schwab) to deploy a vast “neural net” that would turn human bodies into “nodes” on the Internet of Things.

At the time, she explained that this was being controlled and coordinated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (GEOINT) but she didn’t know that vaccination would be the means by which this technology would be deployed."

vpwwx9
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115576-Graphene-in-the-vaccines&p=1476215&viewfull=1#post1476215

DaveToo

17th January 2022, 02:04

LA QUINTA COLUMNA 1-ON-1: SPANISH RESEARCHER FIRST TO REVEAL GRAPHENE OXIDE
1/15/22
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/la-quinta-columna-1-on-1-spanish-researcher-first-to-reveal-graphene-oxide/

Thanks onawah.
I was going to comment on this topic even without this latest video that was posted.

Stew asked the doctor a question similar to what I am going to ask now.

You can count on one hand, possibly two, the number of people who have gone public with their findings about the contents of the jabs.

I believe they are all being truthful with what they have discovered.

With all the doctors, scientists, lab experts, virologists, biologists etc. around the world that can
gain access to the ubiquitous jabs, one would think that there would be dozens and dozens or even hundreds who would have done this same research.

It's not very difficult at all. A microscope and discarded vial would be all that's required to examine the jab contents.

I can well understand the reluctance of people to go public with their findings under their own name.
Some type of reprisal would be almost guaranteed.

But there are many ways to release findings and still remain anonymous.
It puzzles me as to why we aren't seeing more people doing this research and
releasing it to the public.

Does anyone have any thoughts about this?

onawah

17th January 2022, 02:20

Outstanding article! :bump:
Thanks John.

Activated by 5G Pulsed Microwave Radiation?

https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/nano-bloed-570x360-0.jpg?resize=700%2C441

Is there graphene in the Corona vaccines and are they active by the 5G frequencies? factchecknederland.afp.com (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://factchecknederland.afp.com/http%25253A%25252F%25252Fdoc.afp.com%25252F9F63FK-1)This is very quickly contradicted. The saying goes: where there is smoke, there is fire (=where there are rumors of wrongdoing, there must be something wrong)

Sources of ionizing radiation

Ionizing radiation is naturally present, but can also come from artificial sources. Radiation from natural sources is called background radiation.

Radiation from natural sources

-Cosmic rays from the universe. Cosmic rays come from the sun and from sources outside the solar system. At high altitudes, cosmic rays are less shielded by the atmosphere;

-Radiation from the bottom. Radiation from the soil is called terrestrial radiation. It is emitted by certain minerals in the soil. A radioactive noble gas, radon, is also released from the soil into the air that we breathe. The amount of radiation from the soil and the amount of radon is low in the Netherlands. This has to do with the favorable soil type in the Netherlands.

Radiation from artificial sources

-Medical care. During medical examinations, people may be briefly exposed to radiation. For example, if the dentist makes X-rays of the teeth. Such a low dose of radiation is not dangerous. Sometimes radiation is deliberately applied, for example in radiotherapy with radioactive isotopes in breast cancer or prostate cancer. The radiologist ensures an optimal consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of applying radiation;

-Industry. Industry uses radiation, eg nuclear installations to generate energy (nuclear power plants) and nuclear research reactors to produce isotopes for industrial and medical applications, also use radioactivity.

https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Elektromagnetisch_spectrum.jpg?resize=700%2C268

Effects on humans

Ionizing radiation can cause damage to tissues, and DNA autoriteitnvs.nl/onderwerpen/straling/ioniserende-straling-bronnen-en-effecten (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.autoriteitnvs.nl/onderwerpen/straling/ioniserende-straling-bronnen-en-effecten)

The fifth column

The fifth column or LA QUINTA COLOMNA is a free thought movement founded by Ricardo Delgado Martin. Graduated in statistics from the University of Seville (Spain). Measurements with analog Geiger counters* have ended up at La Quinta and it appears that ionizing radiation has been measured around 5G antennas. Together with Dr. José Luis Sevilla has Ricardo Delgado's thoughts on this. Indeed, a 5G antenna is supposed to emit non-ionizing radiation, as the Telecom providers say, and yet Geiger counters reveal that these antennas emit ionizing radiation.

straalsleed.nl/blog/ Makes-5g- Use-of-ionizing-Railing (https://stralingsleed-nl.translate.goog/blog/maakt-5g-gebruik-van-ioniserende-straling/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en)

*The Geiger counter (also called Geiger-Müller counter, Geiger-Müllertel tube, GM tube or GM counter) is a radiation detector that can be used to measure ionizing radiation.

Ionizing radiation from UV light

Ultraviolet (abbreviated UV, also called ultraviolet radiation, black light or UV light) is electromagnetic radiation after visible light. The wavelength after visible light is becoming shorter and more energetic. With regard to the effects of ultraviolet light on humans and the environment, a distinction is made between;

-UV A. Uv A is ultraviolet radiation with a wavelength between approximately 315 and 400 nm,
-UV B. Uv B has a wavelength between 280 and 315 nm
-UV C. Uv C has a wavelength between 100 and 280 nm (“ short-wave radiation").

Radiation with a shorter wavelength (between 10 and 100 nm) does not fall in the UV spectrum, but belongs to the so-called soft X-rays. This is where (on paper) the ionizing radiation starts!

https://i2.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Grafeen-0.jpg?resize=700%2C455

Graphene or 'nano chicken wire'

Among the theories that have been put forward, there is the possibility that the graphene in the environment (dispersed by chemtrails) is being stimulated by the non-ionizing waves emitted by the 5G antennas. It is also possible that the antennas themselves have graphene plates or something similar in their structure that multiply the signal so that it comes within the ionization range. Graphene is a layer of carbon atoms packed in the form of contiguous hexagons, such as a honeycomb. The material is extremely thin, virtually transparent, extremely flexible and much stronger than, for example, steel. Graphene could make the internet a hundred times faster and a camera sensor a thousand times more sensitive. Its appearance is determined by the way the carbon atoms are arranged. These atoms form hexagons,making graphene look like a honeycomb or chicken wire under a very strong microscope. Graphene is therefore sometimes jokingly referred to as 'nano chicken wire' nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/grafeen (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/grafeen/)

Graphene

Oxide Graphene oxide (GO) is the oxidized form of tombstone. That is, graphene functionalized with groups containing oxygen.

'Graphene nanotubes in Corona vaccines are activated by 5G frequencies and change brain processes'

The latest developments and discoveries with regard to graphene (oxide), and the major role that this substance seems to play in the construction of the 'operating system' that is under the guise of 'Covid-19 vaccines' will be injected into people step-by-step, so that everyone will be unsuspectingly integrated with a global Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) controlled 5G/6G network.

* Artificial intelligence (AI) (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?102409-A.I.-is-Progressing-Faster-Than-You-Think-) is the foundation for mimicking human intelligence by creating and applying algorithms built into a dynamic computing environment. Simply put, AI attempts to make computers think and react as if they were humans.

The major news media still claims that a link between graphene (oxide) and Covid-19 is an unproven 'conspiracy theory', but nothing could be further from the truth. The Spanish company Graphena produces various materials and chips made of graphene and in March 2020 the company offered free graphene for the 'treatment of Covid-19'.
The EU is funding the overarching Graphene Flagship graphene-flagship.eu (http://graphene-flagship.eu) with € 1 billion , to which various Dutch universities are also affiliated. And Graphene Flagship launched a special 'Covid-19 Task Force'. It investigated how the body could be 'protected' with graphene and how the material could be used to make society 'Covid-resistant'.

Graphene oxide discovered in Pfizer vaccines

In Spain, university researchers recently discovered that the Pfizer vaccine contains a very high concentration of graphene oxide (coronazwendel.nl/2021/07/05/spaanse-universitaire-spreis-ontdekken-grafeenoxide-nanoparticles- in-pfizer-vaccin-xandernieuws/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.coronazwendel.nl/2021/07/05/spaanse-universitaire-wetenschappers-ontdekken-grafeenoxide-nanodeeltjes-in-pfizer-vaccin-xandernieuws/) and groningerkrant.nl/opinie/column-sars-cov-2-feitelijk-grafeenoxidetoxic/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://groningerkrant.nl/opinie/column-sars-cov-2-feitelijk-grafeenoxidevergiftiging/) ). This was confirmed in at least two other studies.

However, it is still unclear whether Pfizer has added graphene oxide in all batches worldwide. Since the vaccine manufacturers have officially been given complete free rein by the politicians to carry out these medical gene manipulation experiments on humanity, it is theoretically conceivable that in other countries there is no graphene oxide in the injections, but perhaps something else has been added that is not on the package inserts. will be mentioned. Further research into other batches is therefore urgently needed.

(Under the post-WWII Nuremberg Code agreed upon, medical experiments without fully informing recipients and expressly requesting their consent is a very serious crime against humanity for which military tribunals may hand out the death penalty.)

Graphene oxide nanotubes attach themselves to our brain

Riccardo Delgado (presenter of the online program LA QUINTA COLOMNA) and Dr Jose Luis Sevillano (GP) analyzed the now established and undeniable electromagnetism that arises in many people after they have been vaccinated. This effect is called magnetofection. Graphene has (electro-) magnetic properties, and in 2013 it was shown that the magnetism in graphene can be switched 'on' and 'off'. Delgado and Sevillano found that graphene oxide nanotubes in the injections adhere to synapses in the brain. In the study published by ScienceDirect https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32082970/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32082970/) (2019) has already mentioned 'nanotubes' with which medicines (and therefore also 'vaccines') can be introduced into the body, which can also 'make a link with neurons and neuronal networks' in the brain.

Riccardo Delgado: “It is possible to use the carbon nanotubes to create antennas for wireless communication at gigahertz (GHz) and terahertz (THz) wavelength (5G) and thus make people a willful victim. A human-robot! http://straalsleed.nl/blog/de-mens-voor-de-helft-een-computer-is-dit-de-toekomst/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://stralingsleed.nl/blog/de-mens-voor-de-helft-een-computer-is-dit-de-toekomst/)

Graphene nanoparticles self-assemble under the influence of EM fields.

A study by Rice University (Houston) shows that electric fields generated with Tesla coils can transfer energy to graphene nanoparticles, allowing them to act as a miniature power source, but above all to self-assemble in new, longer shapes. The 'behaviour' of graphene nanoparticles can therefore in principle be influenced from a distance by means of electric fields. (Remember in this context that it is the intention that not only every street, but probably also every home, gets its own 5G antenna).

Graphene nanoparticles are not only sensitive to these types of electric fields, but can also serve as antennas for electromagnetic fields in the 5G and 6G range. In a study with human fibroblasts (cells found in our connective tissue) to which graphene nanoparticles had been added, exposure to electromagnetic radiation at frequencies of 900, 2400 or 7500 MHz (say 4G and 5G range) was shown to induce cell death.

Human/robot

The brain then becomes a receiver, but of what? Messages and instructions that give off or cause a certain stimulus, reaction, feeling or thought? Who hand out a reward or punishment? Do those people activate to do something, or make them immobile? Those people show or hear something that is not really there? That erase existing memories and knowledge, and implant false memories and knowledge? With 5G / 6G this is technically possible.

Total permanent control over all people now very close?

So the possibilities for brain and behavioral manipulation will soon be literally limitless? With that, the great dream of all dictatorships finally comes true: TOTAL permanent control over ALL people, even over their behavior, their thoughts, their wishes and their desires? As a working person, do we have a choice to refuse the vaccination?

herstelrepublic.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/alarm-you-become-radioactive-irradiated-everywhere/#more-77668
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://herstelderepubliek.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/alarm-u-wordt-radioactief-bestraald-overal/%23more-77668)mcbspecials.eu/nl/blog/grapheen
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.mcbspecials.eu/nl/blog/grafeen)coronazwendel.nl/2021/08/13/grapheen-nanotubes-in-vaccins-worden-door-5g-frequencies-active-en-veranderen-hersenkoppen-xandernieuws/
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.coronazwendel.nl/2021/08/13/grafeen-nanobuisjes-in-vaccins-worden-door-5g-frequenties-actief-en-veranderen-hersenprocessen-xandernieuws/)https://herstelderepublic.wordpress.com/2021 /07/17/covid-vaccine-inserting-receiving-antennas-let's-watch-what-is-happening-in-your-brain/
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://herstelderepubliek.wordpress.com/2021/07/17/covid-vaccin-het-inbrengen-van-ontvangst-antennes-eens-even-kijken-wat-er-in-uw-hersenen-gebeurt/) Photographer AlexanderAlUS via CC BY-SA 3.0
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graphen.jpg) Photo wavelengths in nanometers : examenoverzicht.nl/natuurkunde/licht
(https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.examenoverzicht.nl/natuurkunde/licht) Photo; icthealth.nl/blog/nano-vaccins-en-medicijncouriers-klein-maar-fijn/ (https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.icthealth.nl/blog/nano-vaccins-en-medicijnkoeriers-klein-maar-fijn/)

source (https://stralingsleed.nl/blog/geactiveerd-door-5g)

jaybee

17th January 2022, 09:51

This might not stop 5g, but it looks like it will result in a new location for the tower.

The Foley family, whose home is within a few metres of the mast, said they cannot describe what they are going through right now

https://www.rte.ie/news/munster/2021/1216/1267143-kerry-mast/

wow... I wonder how long it would have been before everyone living in this house became sick and died...?

https://img.rasset.ie/001a1c3f-800.jpg

the same applies to dwellings anywhere near these masts as well, I think... it's just not so obvious when it's down the road a little way away from a house...

If there were machine guns on top of lamp posts / cell phone masts... spinning round and firing bullets - the effects would be more or less the same - injury and death - but they can get away with the killer 5G because the pollution and the assault is invisible.... if there was something visible people would soon get rid of it by any means possible...

onawah

19th January 2022, 18:21

AT&T, Verizon Will Delay 5G Near Airports After Airline CEOs Warned of ‘Catastrophic Aviation Crisis’
By T. Grant Benson -January 17, 20220105
https://breaking911.com/urgent-airline-ceos-sound-alarm-on-catastrophic-aviation-crisis-when-5g-rollout-begins-this-week/?fbclid=IwAR3ZKX-GnAjAJtqBo-OhRTzuUpI7FvPDYEMWqqiBuG6RNVJlUEwB1XOrzxA

"AT&T and Verizon said Tuesday they will voluntarily limit 5G network around airports amid fears of flights disruptions.

Verizon joins AT&T in delaying some 5G deployments near airports when it turns on its newest version of 5G service tomorrow as both companies work with the FAA and airlines on concerns over possible interference.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1483508727496024066
12.5K views
0:39 / 1:09
10:36 AM · Jan 18, 2022·Twitter Media Studio

Kara Kenney
@KaraKenney6
·
Jan 18
#Breaking: Both
@ATT
and
@Verizon
will halt 5G deployment near airports following concerns from the aviation industry about potential impacts on air travel. Verizon statement:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJZ7pyAX0AcMSpQ?format=png&name=small

The chief executives of major airlines in America Monday sent a letter to the White House warning of a potential “catastrophic” aviation crisis on Wednesday when AT&T and Verizon are scheduled to switch-on the new 5G services.

The CEOs reportedly said the 5G deployment “could potentially strand tens of thousands of Americans overseas.”

“Unless our major hubs are cleared to fly, the vast majority of the traveling and shipping public will essentially be grounded,” the leaders of American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, Southwest Airlines and others wrote in a letter, according to Reuters. “This means that on a day like yesterday, more than 1,100 flights and 100,000 passengers would be subjected to cancellations, diversions or delays.”

President Joe Biden issued a statement thanking the cell carriers for their delay near airports: “I want to thank Verizon and AT&T for agreeing to delay 5G deployment around key airports and to continue working with the Department of Transportation on safe 5G deployment at this limited set of locations.”

“This agreement will avoid potentially devastating disruptions to passenger travel, cargo operations, and our economic recovery, while allowing more than 90 percent of wireless tower deployment to occur as scheduled. This agreement protects flight safety and allows aviation operations to continue without significant disruption and will bring more high-speed internet options to millions of Americans. Expanding 5G and promoting competition in internet service are critical priorities of mine, and tomorrow will be a massive step in the right direction. My team has been engaging non-stop with the wireless carriers, airlines, and aviation equipment manufacturers to chart a path forward for 5G deployment and aviation to safely co-exist – and, at my direction, they will continue to do so until we close the remaining gap and reach a permanent, workable solution around these key airports.”

https://breaking911.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/WhatsApp-Image-2022-01-17-at-3.06.37-PM.jpeg

https://breaking911.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/WhatsApp-Image-2022-01-17-at-3.06.42-PM.jpeg

Reuters U.S. News
@ReutersUS
EXCLUSIVE Major U.S. airline CEOs warn 5G could ground some planes, wreak havoc http://reut.rs/326ts1o
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJU99BNXwAI8dLf?format=jpg&name=small
11:30 AM · Jan 17, 2022·True Anthem
39
Retweets
17
Quote Tweets
39
Likes

According to the report from Reuters, the letter was sent to White House National Economic Council director Brian Deese, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Steve Dickson and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel."

DaveToo

19th January 2022, 20:16

Reuters U.S. News
@ReutersUS
EXCLUSIVE Major U.S. airline CEOs warn 5G could ground some planes, wreak havoc http://reut.rs/326ts1o
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJU99BNXwAI8dLf?format=jpg&name=small
11:30 AM · Jan 17, 2022·True Anthem
39
Retweets
17
Quote Tweets
39
Likes

According to the report from Reuters, the letter was sent to White House National Economic Council director Brian Deese, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Steve Dickson and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel."

Funny how they were obviously able to do tests to these computer systems but the communications companies didn't feel any need to do tests to populations prior to their 5G rollout.

onawah

22nd January 2022, 04:49

Americans for Responsible Technology
<info@americansforresponsibletech.org> via gmail.mcsv.net
1/21/22
https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/fdapetition

"Dear friends,

We'd like to remind you of three important things during these cold, dark days of winter.

1. The FDA Petition

Our FDA legal petition was filed on December 21st. We have not yet had a response from the FDA, which is not surprising. We fully expect the agency to reject our petition, forcing us to go to court (see below). Comments to the FDA are critical to the success of this action.

If you haven't had a chance to file your comment yet, it's not too late. You can find sample comments and instructions on how to file here.
https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/fdapetition

BTW, we've gotten some emails from people filing comments who are confused when asked "What is your comment about?" Since this is the FDA site, there is not (yet) an option to select "wireless radiation." If you are a medical professional, please select that choice. If not, we recommend you select "individual consumer."
Speaking of going to court, we are in the process of raising funds for the legal work required to move forward with our case. This effort demands a lot of historical research, and court costs and lawyers' fees add up quickly. If you are in a position to help contribute to our legal fund, we would very much appreciate your donation in any amount. Thank you!
CONTRIBUTE TO THE ART LEGAL FUND

2. Our work in Washington continues.

As you recall, the recent infrastructure bill passed by Congress contained a provision, written by the telecoms, that requires that all new local broadband projects must "support the deployment of 5G" to receive priority government funding.

The wireless industry claims, with a straight face, that its goal is to help close the digital divide, even though the industry has been red-lining minority communities for years, and never completed the job of connecting everyone with fiberoptic cable, which they promised and we all paid for through our phone bills.

This outrageous money and power grab by the telecom industry ($65 billion of your tax dollars) shows just how much influence it has in Washington, but it's a travesty that must be fixed!

ART is teaming up with like-minded organizations in Washington to demand congressional hearings and a change in the language of the law. Stay tuned.
3. It's all about the Code...

Any application for construction of a small cell antenna in your community will be subject to the code in place at the time of the application. If your town or city's code doesn't take advantage of the power given to local governments by Congress, you're out of luck.
Local governments can't prohibit 5G antennas - that's against the law. But they can - and should - arm themselves with language that gives them protection from the irresponsible placement of antennas in the community.

Our document on "Smart Planning Provisions" is based on information from some of the top attorneys in the field who know the law and the options that are available to local officials.

So don't let any municipal official tell you, "Our hands are tied by the FCC." If they do, ask them to invite ART representatives to meet with them and explain the options they have. There is no cost or obligation.
Thank you for your ongoing support for our efforts to protect individuals and communities from involuntary exposure to wireless radiation. We appreciate your feedback; let us know what more we could be doing to help, and follow our late-breaking news on social media.

Doug Wood
And the rest of the ART team!"

onawah

27th January 2022, 06:22

History of the Anti-Wireless Movement
1/26/22
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/History-of-the-Anti-Wireless-Movement.pdf
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/nlg18OrimJ8o0rC3c8cDVGebgpZ-cPzYqigW1Iv49Lxrz89NZ2V3Ly-I0g1tjnWx-MmAlFComZu9IET6C7qAgFYhRnd9-B_qt6kf5Y40so5mqMocTmV109nG1pU4wwnhKewmoJdcxqwXoUFeNdAq3GaZH5qidAf-zdI1MbG5SuGFiwEskJvA1ED1wmbvTcnsEGfrNqxLwow1xXtR84z9vSwndX57BR34OiMxDwHucqVXUkqMsZaCyKgguM2kG81YJJ8c Re2uf1Aj3gOQK1Dj8wWN6CPeikK5DOqXRxuuwnXGSHTOvKhJ8juJH6dVjYoqfNnCJ9n-yzEI8CLeWwJ12qJUHMder6MFYMQmtXnelPw4EbWqUiGk3Hnbzo5xX22AX1PiEgvr4GYgs_5tvx7F4uv-9pmUGd9n2IcIjnCgkfLMWpwNQcLEa12eXZsgpRETQooM-pv1GPYQptZxyHwkyjFrWCB8U_PR_XRq3tPTZaAr57Up9uGc3gcg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/78aa9c1fdbd125d7d64cbf32fc8a9e18315f13d6461d573e4fdbf8d302d03397.jpg?e=IPuDj1fdqdWhPyBbtbsa-agwH2QMqJkuEUYAZWT_9veGgQ710QqkQPHnmr7XZTcVtZm_fWdtS9oeVjFMl69zaFFBepDlroQ2xGnzFpUChV3ItS9xSgOjV0rAr oWOV5raonRpfB-7bdDb-h4EtBn_kDoBiQiCoXTWOz9_BXhvbK-_yo3dFW0ffmp-hl5I1U2QGhjIC7SPRRSa_DyadgdnACcwqLfVzGWKf5g4NKVIRkkk

(To forward this newsletter via social media, copy and paste this link:
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/History-of-the-Anti-Wireless-Movement.pdf )

"In 1996, when almost no one owned a cell phone, and WiFi had not yet been
invented, organizations formed to oppose wireless technology in order to protect
our world from an unprecedented assault. The telecommunications industry planned
to put a cell phone in the hands of every man, woman and child so they could
communicate instantaneously from any point on Earth to any other point on Earth.
In order to accomplish this, and for the first time in the history of the planet, every
square inch of the Earth was going to be bathed in microwave radiation at all times.
Also every human being -- all seven billion of us – were going to become sources of
such radiation. This was also unprecedented. Human beings, like all other creatures,
were part of nature, not its enemy. But for the first time in the history of the Earth,
every member of one of its species was going to be emitting radiation wherever they
went.
Today, in 2021, when almost everyone owns a cell phone, WiFi, and an average of
23 other wireless devices, both the organizations and their goals have changed.
Health and nature have already been destroyed, and the fight is no longer against
wireless technology but, often, against each other. The purpose of this article is to
review this history in order to remind people of the purpose of our movement and to
unify and redirect global action once again to where it needs to be: against all of
wireless technology in order to stop the radiation and recover our health and
environment before it is too late. I will focus this article on the opposition in the
United States because I am most familiar with it, but similar dynamics have been
operating in other countries.
2
On February 8, 1996, the Telecommunications Act was signed into law, mandating
the rollout of wireless technology across America, and prohibiting local governments
from protecting their citizens’ health and environment from the radiation that it
produces. Both existing and new organizations all over the United States united to
oppose wireless technology and to try to restore democracy.
The EMR Alliance, which until that time had focused on radiation from power lines
and computers, now directed its energies to fight cell towers. Citizens for the
Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities was organized. I helped
found the Cellular Phone Task Force to oppose not just cell towers but cell towers’
reason for being, which is cell phones. Other organizations that formed included Noe
Valley Families Against the Antennas; Healthy Home Alliance; Families for
Appropriate Cellular Tower Siting; Ulysses Citizens for Responsible Technology;
Hardwick Action Committee; Thistle Hill Neighborhood Alliance; Coalition of
Concerned Citizens for Responsible Technologies; Citizens of Marin for Sensible
Communications Planning; Northboro Residents for Responsible Tower Siting;
Telecommunications Master Plan Coalition of San Francisco; and Rainier Valley
Association for Safe Wireless Technology. These and other groups, individuals, public
officials, and the Communications Workers of America, joined together to sue the
Federal Communications Commission in order to protect health, nature and
democracy.
In 2000, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against us, and the Supreme Court
refused to hear our case.
In the aftermath of our failure, a national coalition called the EMR Network was
formed to try to unify efforts to protect us all against radiation. But in the five years
since the passage of the Telecommunications Act, a majority of the population had
acquired cell phones, and many had also acquired WiFi, which had recently been
invented. Cracks formed in the coalition, which was beginning to split into factions.
One faction still opposed all of wireless technology. Another opposed cell towers but
not cell phones, as if one could exist without the other, and as if the radiation did not
come from both. A third represented the interests of people who called themselves
electrically sensitive. And not only were there differences of opinion among us, but
outside interests had infiltrated our movement and helped to divide us.
The EMR Alliance, which had previously functioned as a national coalition, vanished.
Its corporate counsel, Michael Withey, was the head of a national network of
personal injury lawyers hunting for million dollar lawsuits, called the Electromagnetic
3
Radiation Case Evaluation Team (EMRCET). When those lawyers concluded that ours
was a losing cause and there was no money to be made from lawsuits about
electromagnetic radiation, EMRCET disbanded, and the EMR Alliance also
disappeared.
Another lawyer, James Hobson, who had represented most of the parties before the
Second Circuit, and who became counsel for the EMR Network, was a
telecommunications lawyer who, simultaneous to representing the parties against
the FCC, represented a number of telecommunications companies, as well as the
Telecommunications Industry Association, on other matters. He had also previously
been in-house counsel for the FCC.
George Carlo, a lawyer as well as a scientist, who had headed up the
telecommunications industry’s effort to prove cell phones safe, made headlines
when he switched sides and wrote a book condemning cell phones as dangerous. It
was titled Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age. He attempted to join the
national coalition against wireless technology, but like Hobson, not everyone trusted
him. He had spent most of his career as a scientist-for-hire working for major
polluters. In addition to being hired by the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association to prove cell phones safe, he had been a consultant to the Tobacco
Institute, Dow Chemical, Dow Corning, the Chlorine Institute and other polluters and
published articles for two decades purporting to show that tobacco smoke, breast
implants, dioxins, herbicides, and other chemicals were not dangerous.
Eventually the EMR Network, beset by internal quarreling, broke up and yet another
coalition, called the EMR Policy Institute, formed. And gradually, over the years, as
the wireless industry’s adversaries came more and more to also be its customers,
they abandoned, for the most part, the fight to protect human health, nature, and
democracy. Many opponents of cell towers today are not only not opposed to cell
phones, but they are heavily addicted to them and have damaged their health from
years of exposing themselves to their radiation. The birds, insects and animals have
already disappeared from their yards and they have grown used to living without
them. I used to get more calls asking how to help fight wireless technology. Now,
more often, people call me or email me from their cell phones asking me what is the
safest kind of cell phone to use, how far away from their body to hold it, what kinds
of devices will best neutralize the radiation, and how to distinguish a 5G tower from
a 4G tower. When I tell them that radiation is radiation, that there is no way to
“neutralize” it, that distance doesn’t matter, and that it is destroying the Earth
regardless of what you call it, they don’t understand what I am saying. More and
4
more, they ask, in frustration, “What is the alternative?” And when I answer that the
alternative to not having a cell phone is the imminent, well-under-way destruction of
all life on Earth, including their own, they don’t seem to register what I am saying.
They simply can’t imagine living without a cell phone. ECHOEarth (End Cellphones
Here On Earth), an organization that I helped create in May 2020 in order to build a
movement to abandon wireless technology, still has fewer than 2,000 members
although 300,000 people and organizations have signed the International Appeal to
Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.
Meanwhile the EMR Policy Institute has also disappeared and a lot of new
organizations have taken its place. The focus of many is not to stop wireless
technology, or even cell towers, any more, but just to stop the newest version of
them, which is called “5G”. There is an international coalition called Stop 5G
International. In the United States there are Stop 5G Chicago, Stop 5G San Diego,
Stop 5G Hawaii, Stop 5G Georgia, 5G Free California, 5G Free Vermont, 5G
Awareness Now, 5G Colorado Action, Citizens Against 5G Cell Towers, and dozens of
other organizations with similar names. For many it is not because they no longer
think radiation is harmful, but because they have given up trying to stop it, and
because most of their members own cell phones.
And there are still outside interests assuming positions of leadership in our
movement, and telecommunications lawyers representing us in court. Children’s
Health Defense, directed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is doing wonderful advocacy
work. However, it has been represented in its legal work against 5G by Scott
McCollough, a telecommunications lawyer. Like George Carlo and James Hobson, he
claims to have switched sides, but his website does not say anything of the sort, and
he has told me that he does not believe RF radiation harms everyone, just people
with electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
And there is a new national coalition that is now filling the void left by the EMR
Policy Institute. It holds Zoom meetings every other Friday, and has invited a series
of excellent speakers to present at these meetings. But they are only speaking to the
choir, and the organizer of that coalition, Odette Wilkens, is a technology lawyer who
makes her living representing IBM. IBM is the company that launched a “Smarter
Planet” campaign in 2008 and a “Smarter Cities Challenge” in 2010. Everything IBM
does today depends on cell phones and wireless technology. I have asked Odette
whether she has a conflict of interest, but she has not responded. She is also an
animal rights activist for which I admire her and I would like to be able to trust her,
but she has give me no reason to do so.
5
Odette tried to sabotage the amicus brief that was filed in support of our current
petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. She convinced the coordinator of the amicus
brief not to file it, after a lot of organizations had already signed on and people had
already donated money toward it, so that I had to find another organization on short
notice to take over the effort and get it filed. She told a lot of people why not to sign
on to the amicus brief and why not to donate money toward it. It was after she did
this that I investigated her and discovered who she works for. Her new website,
wiredbroadband.org, doesn’t even have her name anywhere on it. In an interview (at
37:55) she said, falsely, that the preemption clause in the Telecommunications Act,
which we are again asking the Supreme Court to strike down, does not apply to 5G
and that people should not worry about it. She said that local governments are free
to prohibit 5G towers to protect our health and environment because they provide
“broadband” services and not “cell phone” services.
But that is false. Today “cellular” and “broadband” have merged and there is no
difference. 5G provides both voice and internet services. And the preemption clause
does not say “cell towers,” it says “personal wireless service facilities,” which
encompasses everything. We are back before the Supreme Court after twenty years
asking it, again, to strike down that clause, in order to restore to local governments
the right to protect our health and environment, and impose liability on
telecommunications companies that injure and kill people. In 2000, the Second
Circuit addressed only the issue of States’ Rights. Today we are asking for our
Personal Rights to life, liberty, and property. And in our petition to the Supreme
Court we are represented not by telecommunications lawyers, but by lawyers with
expertise in environmental law and civil rights.
The radiation emitted by cell phones is more, not less harmful than the radiation
emitted by cell towers. There are 15 billion mobile devices in the world, and only
seven million towers. And the phones are right next to everyone’s body. The main
difference is that people have become used to them. People have become used to
the absence of butterflies and sparrows. People have become used to being fat and
diabetic, and at risk for heart attacks and strokes. By this newsletter I am reaching
out to all organizations and people who love this Earth. I ask them to remember
what they are fighting for and to unite together in a campaign to abandon wireless
technology and eliminate cell phones from this planet in order to save it. Cell phones
are not the only threat to life on Earth, but they are the most urgent.
Cell phones are effectively radioactive devices. The idea that they are not radioactive
comes from a mistaken distinction that the medical community made a century ago,
6
which most people persist in believing despite a century of research showing that
distinction to be little more than a fantasy. It is a fantasy that says that (a) only
radiation above a certain frequency is energetic enough to remove electrons from
molecules to form ions, (b) this causes genetic mutations which are the cause of
cancer, and (c) radiation is harmless if it does not cause cancer.
The most obvious of those fictions is that radiation has no effects besides cancer.
Whereas in fact radiation acts directly on the electrons in our mitochondria, slowing
metabolism, making us hypoxic, and causing diabetes, heart disease and, yes, cancer.
Radiation also acts directly on all the electric transmission lines in our bodies,
including our nerves, our blood vessels, our heart’s pacemaker, and yes -- even
though western medicine doesn’t recognize their existence -- our acupuncture
meridians. All this plays havoc with life and in just 26 years has wiped out most of the
Earth’s insects, a large percentage of the small birds, and is imminently threatening
to put an end to what’s left -- including us -- if we do not put an end to it.
Please work with me on a campaign to abolish cell phones. It is necessary, it is
realistic, and the alternative is unthinkable. Thousands of people have written to me
over the past few years asking how they can help. You can all help to begin this
movement by throwing away your cell phones and joining ECHOEarth. As soon as
enough people have joined ECHOEarth so that it has strength in numbers, I will
contact the people who want to work on this in earnest and we can discuss the next
steps."
Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Administrator, International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
Caretaker, ECHOEarth (End Cellphones Here On Earth)
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org
January 26, 2022

JackMcThorn

27th January 2022, 11:49

Could 5G really stop your plane taking off?

https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2022/0127/1276129-5g-masts-airports-planes-communication-issues/

Several international airlines recently cancelled flights into certain US airports over concerns the rollout of 5G mobile communication technology could interfere with some planes' equipment. After warnings about the potential problem from aviation bosses and the Federal Aviation Administration, telecommunications companies AT&T and Verizon delayed activating some 5G masts around US airports...

onawah

30th January 2022, 18:30

Why 5G Is Dangerous for Planes — and People
01/28/22
By Jeremy Loffredo
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/del-bigtree-dafna-tachover-5g-dangerous-planes-people/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b785327e-26d7-4c2d-8dc9-f9034d1d1971
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Highwire-Dafna-5G-aviation-dangers-feature-800x417.jpg

"On the latest episode of Del Bigtree’s “The HighWire,” Dafna Tachover, attorney and founder of We Are The Evidence, explained how 5G technology could have catastrophic impacts on airplane safety equipment and why it’s so harmful to human health.

On the latest episode of Del Bigtree’s “The HighWire,” Dafna Tachover, attorney and founder of We Are The Evidence, explained how 5G technology could have catastrophic impacts on airplane safety equipment and why it’s harmful to human health.

The interview followed news last week that executives from the biggest U.S. airlines warned of an impending “catastrophic” aviation crisis unless the Biden administration intervened in plans by AT&T and Verizon to deploy 5G technology near major airports.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
It’s unfortunate that advocates for human health and the environment don’t have the robust lobbying power of the airline industry. The damages to the human and natural biomes from WiFi dwarf the impacts of its interference with aviation altimeters.
childrenshealthdefense.org
Airlines Ask Biden to Delay 5G Rollout, Warn of ‘Catastrophic Aviation Crisis’
Executives from the biggest U.S. airlines asked the Biden administration for "immediate intervention" in today’s scheduled rollout of 5G technology near major airports, warning of an impending...
12:36 PM · Jan 19, 2022·Twitter

Tachover explained how 5G differs from other versions of wireless technology. “1G was calls, 2G was calls and text, 3G was calls, texts and some data, 4G was calls, texts and a lot of data,” she said.

Tachover said 5G is a concept, not just a technology. “It’s a concept of infrastructure that’s supposed to allow the Internet of Things, driverless cars and anything and everything else moving forward,” she explained.

Tachover said:

“We’re going to interconnect tens of billions of devices. Everything in our house and our environment is going to communicate and intercommunicate … Your laptop will talk to your refrigerator, your laundry machine to your tea kettle.”

Tachover told Bigtree even the most mundane objects will be connected to the internet, even diapers — a small sensor and antenna sends an alert to the mother’s smartphone every time a baby poops.

“So all of these devices will be interconnected and for that we need a much more intense infrastructure of antennas … and that is what 5G is,” she said.In the beginning, telecommunication giants thought they would run 5G off of millimeter-wave networks, Tachover said. But the industry ran into a problem. The millimeter-wave networks are easily obstructed by different environmental factors, such as trees, houses and walls — so they fail to reach medium to long distances.

“So you would need to put many more antennas in very close proximity in order to have this network function,” Tachover said.

So the telecom industry moved to buy lower frequencies, known as the C band frequencies, from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) for their so-called “next-generation wireless networks.”

The C band frequencies travel faster and further than the frequencies on which the telecom industry originally planned to build the 5G network.

Before telecom industry giants purchased the C band frequencies in 2021, the frequencies were used primarily by the military, Tachover said.

“The purchase forced the military to change the frequency used by their communication equipment to make way for Verizon, AT&T and their Internet of Things,” she said.

The only problem, said Tachover, is that commercial airlines also use these C band frequencies for their safety communication equipment — a fact no one considered until very recently.

“So the military got off of the [C band] because it was being sold, but no one talked to the airlines?” asked Bigtree.

“Correct,” said Tachover. And the risk is that the antennas and technology that commercial airplanes use to measure and communicate altitudes and weather systems is the same frequency that the telecom industry plans to put its network on.

“When you have two antennas that use the same frequency there’s going to be interference,” she said. “That is clearly a huge risk,” she said.

Tachover said the Federal Aviation Administration ordered a halt to the 5G implementation, but at only 50 airports, out of 5,217 public airports in the U.S.

“What about all of the other ones?” she said. “And it’s not even the main airports.”

Tachover explained:

“It seems the telecommunications industry has so much power, they’re allowed to endanger planes, air traffic and people in order to bring download speeds from 10 seconds to 2 seconds. How can that be more important than safety? … It’s outrageous.”

Tachover said wireless technology regulations are outdated, especially when it comes to the impact of the technology on human health.

She said:

“The FCC adopted health guidelines on radio frequency or wireless technology in 1996, and since 1996, the FCC has not updated its guidelines despite thousands of studies, including government studies, showing clear evidence [of harm].”

In 2013, a federal court forced the FCC to open an online public forum, asking whether or not the commission should review the outdated guidelines.In the beginning, telecommunication giants thought they would run 5G off of millimeter-wave networks, Tachover said. But the industry ran into a problem. The millimeter-wave networks are easily obstructed by different environmental factors, such as trees, houses and walls — so they fail to reach medium to long distances.

“So you would need to put many more antennas in very close proximity in order to have this network function,” Tachover said.

So the telecom industry moved to buy lower frequencies, known as the C band frequencies, from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) for their so-called “next-generation wireless networks.”

The C band frequencies travel faster and further than the frequencies on which the telecom industry originally planned to build the 5G network.

Before telecom industry giants purchased the C band frequencies in 2021, the frequencies were used primarily by the military, Tachover said.

“The purchase forced the military to change the frequency used by their communication equipment to make way for Verizon, AT&T and their Internet of Things,” she said.

The only problem, said Tachover, is that commercial airlines also use these C band frequencies for their safety communication equipment — a fact no one considered until very recently.

“So the military got off of the [C band] because it was being sold, but no one talked to the airlines?” asked Bigtree.

“Correct,” said Tachover. And the risk is that the antennas and technology that commercial airplanes use to measure and communicate altitudes and weather systems is the same frequency that the telecom industry plans to put its network on.

“When you have two antennas that use the same frequency there’s going to be interference,” she said. “That is clearly a huge risk,” she said.

Tachover said the Federal Aviation Administration ordered a halt to the 5G implementation, but at only 50 airports, out of 5,217 public airports in the U.S.

“What about all of the other ones?” she said. “And it’s not even the main airports.”

Tachover explained:

“It seems the telecommunications industry has so much power, they’re allowed to endanger planes, air traffic and people in order to bring download speeds from 10 seconds to 2 seconds. How can that be more important than safety? … It’s outrageous.”

Tachover said wireless technology regulations are outdated, especially when it comes to the impact of the technology on human health.

She said:

“The FCC adopted health guidelines on radio frequency or wireless technology in 1996, and since 1996, the FCC has not updated its guidelines despite thousands of studies, including government studies, showing clear evidence [of harm].”

In 2013, a federal court forced the FCC to open an online public forum, asking whether or not the commission should review the outdated guidelines."

vqnyx7/?pub=ijro7

ExomatrixTV

31st January 2022, 00:03

prk0a8bf9d
source (https://gettr.com/post/prk0a8bf9d)

onawah

2nd February 2022, 20:31

5G POWERED GRAPHENE BASED NANO-TECH IN THE PFIZER VACCINE
2/2/22
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/5g-powered-graphene-based-nano-tech-in-the-pfizer-vaccine/

"This latest Greg Reese video about the findings of La Quinta Columna (the Fifth Column) is of interest for both the injected and the non-injected, because we all need to know what is in them and their potential effects. Those who are able to survive the procedure may find they are no longer in control of their own will.

***
TRANSCRIPT

The Fifth Column recently published their findings and conclusions on the strange, self-assembling nanotech they discovered in the Pfizer mRNA vaxxines via optical microscopy analysis.

The objects they found in the vaxxine correspond with known items in the scientific record and the conclusion they come to seems quite clear: that the well-documented scientific goal to use nanotechnology in living human beings to form networks capable of controlling several nano machines is currently being deployed in the CoV-19 vaxxines, which amounts to the most intrusive assault against humanity in all of recorded history.

While the media and Government lie and cover for Big Pharma, the official ingredients are still unknown.

But we have thousands of brilliant scientists worldwide studying these experimental vaxxines. Some have died in highly-suspicious ways but most have been able to share their findings and the work shows us that graphene oxide is a key component in all of this.

There have been dozens of official documented studies on the use of graphene oxide related to how we see it being used here today, among other things, as a power converter.

Graphene. The one-atom thick hexagonally-arranged carbon atoms is the thinnest and strongest material known to man and an outstanding conductor of heat and electricity.

It can boost gigahertz frequencies into terahertz, which is exactly what these nanotech machines need for power.

In order to do this, the graphene first needs a frequency to power it and the optimal frequency to externally power graphene is known to be 26 GHz, which is also the frequency put out by 5G.

In this model, the graphene within the body is activated by microwave signals in the gigahertz range, which it then boosts into the terahertz range, which then powers the novel nanotech machinery to self-assemble within the human body.

Once assembled, what do these nanotech machines do?

The images, compared to the scientific literature suggest that they are the foundation of an internal electronic system, with endless potential for biomanipulation of the human host.

Nano routers then emit MAC addresses, able to be registered via Bluetooth. Nano and plasma antennas, to amplify signals. Nano rectannnas, to act as rectifier bridges from AC to DC current, codecs and logic gates for encryption of communications.

The raw material for all this self-assembly is also graphene oxide, and when we compare known side effects of graphene oxide to the side effects of the CoV-19 vaxxines, we find them to be the same.

Once graphene oxide is injected into the body, it acquires magnetic properties, predictably, beside the injection site, the heart and the brain.

Graphene is seen as a pathogen by our immune system and will often result in paralysis and stroke. Graphene is known to cause blood clots and heart conditions.

Graphene oxide can generate small discharges, causing cardiac arrhythmia.

There is so much going on with these experimental vaxxines and the evidence seems clear that a mass experiment is going on, with certain batches marked more deadly than others.

And certain batches contain a bold new technology, akin to a manmade parasite, intended to control the host human, if it doesn’t kill them first, in the process.

Perhaps that is what the mad scientists and psychopaths are after: human genetics that can withstand this invasive and deadly nanotech."

vr6v2k/?pub=ijro7

ExomatrixTV

6th February 2022, 03:00

5G Powered Graphene Based Nano-Tech in the Pfizer Vaccine:

61f94e7d17bdc33301c16f51

DaveToo

6th February 2022, 03:22

onawah

6th February 2022, 04:07

I have no idea HOW it's done, but the WHY may be because it would be much more difficult to hide what they are doing otherwise.

If complex computer chips can self-assemble as is claimed to be taking place inside our bodies after being jabbed, then Intel, AMD and the other chip manufacturers could save a ton of money using the same technique to make their chips.
And they could do it without having to worry about body fluids hampering the process!!!
Just as demolition companies could save billions of dollars on explosives if they simply followed the 'create a fire and watch the building collapse' model shown to be effective on 9/11.
Please someone, anyone, explain how it is possible for these complex computer circuits to be manufactured in our bodies out of graphene oxide?

onawah

7th February 2022, 21:12

Geoengineered Transhumanism - Elana Freeland
2/6/22
https://rumble.com/vu93ri-geoengineered-transhumanism-elana-freeland.html

"Writer and lecturer, Elana Freeland, discusses the direction that our sophisticated technology is heading, and some of the challenges that humanity as a whole will be forced to confront.

If the World Economic Forum’s planned path for the world comes to fruition, human beings will live in a vastly different world than the one experienced today. Freedom of movement will be limited, synthetic biology will play a huge role, and human beings will no longer be natural. They will legally become classified as a new species: transhuman.

Is it too late to break away from the planned enslavement of the population, or is now the time to come together and fight the psychopaths before they are able to close the doors to the digital prison behind us?"

vrmxog/?pub=ijro7

ExomatrixTV

21st February 2022, 19:22

Look At That! ... Cumulative Lethal EMF Radiation is the enemy from within ...

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/x/3/Z/j/x3Zjd.caa.mp4

source (https://rumble.com/vvhwif-look-at-that-...-cummelative-lethal-emf-radiation-is-the-enemy-from-within-.html)

DaveToo

21st February 2022, 20:26

ExomatrixTV

22nd February 2022, 01:34

Mashika

22nd February 2022, 01:46

5G Radiation? - More Birds Are Dropping Dead All Over The World:

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/y/S/-/j/yS-jd.caa.mp4

source (https://rumble.com/vviuqg-5g-radiation-more-birds-are-dropping-dead-all-over-the-world.html)

cheers,
John

Mexican researcher looking into this
https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/estados/2022/02/19/misterio-resuelto-esta-es-la-razon-detras-de-la-muerte-de-pajaros-en-chihuahua/

The phenomenon that caused the death of several dozen birds in the town of Rubio, municipality of Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua, has nothing to do with pollution or some electric shock, but with an electromagnetic event related to the radio communication towers.

According to Jorge Contreras, specialist in natural resources and former collaborator of the Pronatura-American Bird Conservancy civil association, this event would have caused the yellow-headed thrush flock to lose its orientation while flying, which led to its precipitation against the pavement.

“The electromagnetic field that these birds use to communicate, to join and to fly in sync, was affected by some near or distant radio communication system, which crossed or crossed the point where the flock was flying at that time, affecting them and causing them to collapse,” explained the specialist.

DaveToo

22nd February 2022, 02:27

ExomatrixTV

13th March 2022, 19:44

5G Marketing False Advertising? - Henley University 2022 Lecture:

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/9/R/s/v/9Rsvd.gaa.mp4

source (https://rumble.com/vxaewt-5g-marketing-false-advertising-henley-university-2022-lecture.html)

more info: here (https://web.archive.org/web/20220315213612/https://whynotnews.eu/2022/03/5g-marketing-false-advertising-henley-university-2022-lecture/) :dog:

MartinNovotny

14th March 2022, 06:29

Please check https://signstop5g.eu, read the content (you can switch to different language in upper right corner) and if you are an EU citizen, pls support this ECI. If you know some of your EU friends share the same view, pls send them https://signstop5g.eu link. Thanks!

onawah

22nd March 2022, 02:55

Free 5G Summit:The TRUTH About EMF & 5G
3/21/22
https://emfhazards.com/?oprid=11657&ref=5

"Over the next few days, you’ll be hearing about this 4-day online virtual summit titled the "EMF Hazards Summit".
It’s the only one of its kind, focused on safeguarding your entire household from 5G and electropollution.
The host of the summit Nicolas Pineault, is a friend of mine who gave me a link to share with you so that you can claim your “virtual” seat at the online event for FREE!
Here’s your link to claim your seat and [register here before it’s too late]. → EMF Hazards Summit https://emfhazards.com/?oprid=11657&ref=51
Once you register, you’ll get a link each day to the free summit talks.
Just make sure that you don’t miss out on this one!
See you there,
Alexandra

P.S. If you're to start safeguarding your entire household from electropollution, preserving your good health and increasing your odds of living a long and healthy life, then I encourage you to dive into this innovative and game-changing virtual EMF summit - while it's still free!"

https://emfhazards.com/?oprid=11657&ref=51

onawah

4th April 2022, 20:12

Learn to overcome the symptoms of EMFs and fibromyalgia (new summit)
From: Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense <lloyd@electricsense.com>
4/4/22

"EMFs can cause on-going stress to your immune system, which affects your nervous system and restricts blood flow and oxygen to your organs. If you, or someone you love is battling fibromyalgia, this is particularly relevant.

→ Click here to learn why ←https://fibrosummit.byhealthmeans.com/?idev_id=11469

When my own sensitivity to EMFs blew up, chronic pain was a huge part of it - from searing headaches to full body pain, the reaction seemed to take on a life of its own.

Finally science is catching up with this. A recent study showcased a pathological link between excess exposure to electromagnetic devices as underlying or at least augmenting factors of fibromyalgia symptoms.**

And reduced exposure to EMFs & dirty electricity continues to show reports of symptom relief from all forms of fibromyalgia.*

See the image below:
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/W8UxSMcr3D-ETYBUAjCFq7qcToObk5lF91FcSycDhEqGrHpF0lhtvyz_6C1ab8QRV4rQZbgxQVW3h5LdYufp4FJiIBpFoURDxFgwviQgmDbm4nf YfCz-rLqPqCoxXT1lluyrv851QUE6=s0-d-e1-ft#https://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/fibro-summit.png?t=1649068995
Join the conversation about fibromyalgia this upcoming May, where you can learn the ins and outs about Fibromyalgia with Dr. Rodger Murphree who has devoted himself to specializing in fibromyalgia for 20+ years.

Dr. Murphree’s Online Fibro Summit: https://fibrosummit.byhealthmeans.com/?idev_id=11469

Dr. Murphree has found that by focusing on the underlying cause of the fibromyalgia symptoms, patients can see dramatic improvement. Now his mission is to spread the word that with the right information and guidance, patients can learn to overcome fibromyalgia - not just “live with it.”

On top of the daily struggle with pain and fatigue, fibromyalgia patients, (much like those suffering debilitating symptoms of EMF exposure), are forced to fight another challenging battle: convincing doctors, friends, coworkers and others that their condition is real, and that their symptoms don’t only exist in their minds.

→ Find out more at Dr. Murphree’s Online Fibro Summit ←

Don’t forget to mark your calendar for May 16-22, 2022."

To your continued health,

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. When you register for The Fibro Summit, you’ll also unlock early-access interviews, complimentary guides and helpful eBooks about living your most resilient life!

P.P.S. If the above link don’t work copy/paste this link into your browser https://fibrosummit.byhealthmeans.com/?idev_id=11469

ElectricSense
132, Avenue de Rochefort
Royan Poitou Charentes 17200
FRANCE

ExomatrixTV

12th April 2022, 14:12

If 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) is "so safe" Then Why Do Wireless Companies Warn Their Shareholders but Not Consumers?

https://whynotnews.eu/pix/stop5g-2022a0.png

The picture below is the “small cell” outside my hotel bedroom window in San Francisco on my last California trip, likely built in the name of 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g). Now, California Governor Newsom has a decision to make about two bills, AB 537 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB537) and SB 556 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB556). If he signs them into law, these bills would strip local authority and make it easier for companies to build “short” 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) “small” cell towers on neighborhood streets.

https://whynotnews.eu/pix/Stop5G-2022a1.jpg

5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) is the fifth generation wireless aiming to tie together the latest and greatest technology at super-fast speeds.

In order to make it work, companies want to erect millions of new short cell towers called “small cells” near homes and schools on poles called “small cells.” According to the FCC, (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-wireless-5g/u-s-court-upholds-fcc-cap-on-5g-small-cell-fees-in-win-for-wireless-carriers-idUSKCN25829Q) hundreds of thousands of new wireless transmitters will be attached to street lights, utility poles and buildings.

Published peer-reviewed research documents (https://ehtrust.org/high-radiation-from-millimeter-wave-5g-deployment-in-austin-texas/) how 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and the densification of network radiation emissions from small cells will increase environmental exposure levels of radiofrequency non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation throughout the neighborhood.
Yet when people protest wireless network antennas being outside their bedroom windows, they are met with safety assurances from telecommunications company and government officials.

If 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and wireless radiation are "so safe" then why do insurance authorities classify 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) as high risk?

“Off the leash — 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) mobile networks” is the title of a Chapter in the 2019 Swiss Re Report (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Swiss-Re-SONAR-Publication-2019-excerpt.pdf) on New Emerging Risks for the Insurance industry, which rates 5G as a “high impact” risk.

“As the biological effects of EMF in general and 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) in particular are still being debated, potential claims for health impairments may come with a long latency. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence.”

Download (https://ehtrust.org/swiss-re-classifies-5g-as-high-risk-in-white-paper/) the Swiss Re report classifying 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) as “high risk” off the leash here.
See Environmental Health Trust’s compendium of insurance company reports on non-ionizing radiation here.

If 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and wireless radiation are "so safe" then why do insurance companies refuse to cover damages from non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation?

For example, the Portland Oregon Public School Genesis Insurance Company (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Portland-Public-School-2017-18-Excess-Liability0D0A-policy-1.pdf) states,
“Exclusions: This insurance does not apply to: Bodily injury, personal injury, advertising injury, or property damage arising directly or indirectly out of, resulting from, caused or contributed to by electromagnetic radiation, provided that such loss, cost or expense results from or is contributed to by the hazardous properties of electromagnetic radiation.”

See Environmental Health Trust’s compendium of insurance company electromagnetic radiation exclusion clauses here (https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/electromagnetic-field-insurance-policy-exclusions/)

If 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and wireless radiation are "so safe" then why do the wireless companies themselves define non-ionizing radiation as a “pollutant?”

Both AT&T Mobile Insurance (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ASATT-531-MI-Terms-web-04.pdf) (pg. 4) (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ASATT-531-MI-Terms-web-04.pdf) and Verizon Total Mobile Protection (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/device-protection-brochure-nationwide.pdf) (page 10) (https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/device-protection-brochure-nationwide.pdf) state that coverage is excluded for pollutants, which are defined as “Any solid, liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritant or contaminant including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acid, alkalis, chemicals, artificially produced electric fields, magnetic field, electromagnetic field, sound waves, microwaves, and all artificially produced ionizing or non-ionizing radiation and waste.”

https://whynotnews.eu/pix/stop5g-2022b1.png

And finally, if 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and wireless radiation are "so safe" then why do wireless companies themselves warn their shareholders of potential risks but not warn customers who buy their products and not warn people living with wireless network antennas directly outside their bedroom windows?

Crown Castle warns shareholders in their 2020 10-K tax filing (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1051470/000105147018000082/cci10-k123117.htm) that:
“If radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets or equipment on our communications infrastructure are demonstrated to cause negative health effects, potential future claims could adversely affect our operations, costs or revenues.
“The potential connection between radio frequency emissions and certain negative health effects, including some forms of cancer, has been the subject of substantial study by the scientific community in recent years. We cannot guarantee that claims relating to radio frequency emissions will not arise in the future or that the results of such studies will not be adverse to us.”

“If a connection between radio frequency emissions and possible negative health effects were established, our operations, costs, or revenues may be materially and adversely affected. We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.”

Verizon Wireless warns their shareholders in their 10-K form (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732712/000073271218000009/a201710-k.htm) to the US Securities and Exchange Commission that:

“Our wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.”

https://whynotnews.eu/pix/stop5g-2022b2.png

Click here (https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/corporate-company-investor-warnings-annual-reports-10k-filings-cell-phone-radiation-risks/) to go to Environmental Health Trust’s compendium of Telecom shareholder warnings in Annual Reports and corporate form 10 K filings.

If 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) and wireless radiation is "so safe" then why aren’t companies being just as honest with us as they are with their shareholders?

Theodora Scarato is Executive Director of Environmental Health Trust (EHT), a scientific think tank creating a healthier environment though research, education and policy. EHT shares more FAQs on 5G here (https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-internet-everything/20-quick-facts-what-you-need-to-know-about-5g-wireless-and-small-cells/).

source (https://theodora-scarato.medium.com/if-5g-is-so-safe-then-why-do-wireless-companies-warn-their-shareholders-but-not-consumers-23171885cabc)

ExomatrixTV

12th April 2022, 14:54

onawah

12th April 2022, 17:21

I second that!

This Sop5G Forum Thread has almost 200,000 visitors :thumbsup: ... and with good reason ... One of the P.A. Admins or Moderators (who remains anonymous) tagged this thread as "5g fear porn" when I started this thread at that time most had no clue ... I wondered if he or she (who remains "anonymous") still thinks it is all "fear porn" ... if so please explain! ... if not ... then please delete/take out the tag ... thanks ... Legit 5G concerns are not "fear porn".

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 April 12, 2022
Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (https://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G)
Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & Twitter.com/Stop5G (https://Twitter.com/Stop5G)

ExomatrixTV

12th April 2022, 17:40

I second that!

This Stop5G Forum Thread has almost 200,000 visitors and 902+ comments :thumbsup: ... and with good reason ... One of the P.A. Admins or Moderators (who remains anonymous) tagged this thread as "5g fear porn" when I started this thread at that time most had no clue ... I wondered if he or she (who wants to remain anonymous) still thinks it is all "fear porn" ... if so, please explain! ... if not ... then please delete/take out the tag ... thanks ... Most know by now that legit 5G concerns (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) are not "fear porn".

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 April 12, 2022
Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (https://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G)
Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & Twitter.com/Stop5G (https://Twitter.com/Stop5G)

:Avalon::bowing:

Nick Matkin

16th April 2022, 12:30

ExomatrixTV

16th April 2022, 13:21

This Stop5G Forum Thread has almost 200,000 visitors and 902+ comments :thumbsup: ... and with good reason ... One of the P.A. Admins or Moderators (who remains anonymous) tagged this thread as "5g fear porn" when I started this thread at that time most had no clue ... I wondered if he or she (who wants to remain anonymous) still thinks it is all "fear porn" ... if so, please explain! ... if not ... then please delete/take out the tag ... thanks ... Most know by now that legit 5G concerns (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) are not "fear porn".

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 April 12, 2022
Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G (https://Fb.com/groups/Stop5G)
Stop5G.net (http://Stop5G.net) & Twitter.com/Stop5G (https://Twitter.com/Stop5G)

So how is the "stopping 5G before it's too late" going?

... there are plenty successes 5G not being used where it originally was suppose to be used thanks to new public awareness ... and I shared many examples of that in this thread ... we (all Stop5G activists worldwide) halted (stopped) "5G projects" on many levels worldwide mostly locally sometimes also nationally ... but you did not study the 900+ content based replies of this thread I guess!

The main mission is raising awareness & (censor-free) education no matter what the outcome is ... (just like with exposing toxic 'vaccines' (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118365-Too-Complex-or-Super-Obvious-What-is-Going-on-Here)).

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Nick Matkin

16th April 2022, 14:27

You're right, after the first few hundred posts I did not read each one subsequently. However, I suspect where the roll-out has been stopped, this will turn out only to have been a delay once people (educated or not) realise how useful it is. Then there's the possibility that even in countries where public EMF exposure limits are either non-existent or not enforced the health risks might in practice to be not significant - or they are can be managed - in the same way we manage other risks to the public.

Simon Sparx

16th April 2022, 15:28

So I guess COVEFE was a bust?

Weren't those mineral symbols that was supposed to help with this 5G radiation?

IDK, might want to revisit that, seems like allot of what was said back at the beginning might actually have some truth to it.

New Wireless Facilities Code Includes Environmental Provision; Addresses Endangered Species, Wetlands, Wildlife Areas, etc. (OK)

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/new-wireless-facilities-code-includes-environmental-provision-addresses-endangered-species-wetlands-wildlife-areas-etc-ok.html

MartinNovotny

17th April 2022, 06:23

Please help us spread the word about European Citizen Initiative "Stop(((5G))) Stay Connected, But Protected" (http://signstop5g.eu) - any resident of EU that signs counts. We need to gather 1.000.000 signatures before Apr 2023 in order to make EP/EC to discuss our proposals. Thanks!

ExomatrixTV

17th April 2022, 22:06

5G News, Russia vs Ukraine, Cults & Is Mexico a Safe Haven?

UEQ1K7dwwwE

ExomatrixTV

26th May 2022, 19:58

Control through our DNA (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118675-Control-through-our-DNA)

ExomatrixTV

26th May 2022, 21:21

Global Protest for Freedom on Earth, Space and in the Oceans:

Gk4sEX7UXto

ExomatrixTV

12th June 2022, 21:08

Innocent Warrior

13th June 2022, 05:55

ExomatrixTV

13th June 2022, 12:14

Innocent Warrior

14th June 2022, 01:38

🚨 Shtf Prepare! New Military Experiment In US| Ex Navy Reveal

yG7FezKqn6E
Shtf ww3 prepper military to deploy new electromagnetic warfare trucks electric sensitivity to be amplified ehs is real and you need know how to block radio frequency signals in a electromagnetic warfare environment.

Hi, John.

There really needs to be a shungite thread. Primarily for its capacity to protect us but it also has other applications with equally mind blowing results that will help people enormously at this time. I’ve been using it and have lots to share about it but I don’t have the time to give a thread on it the attention and maintenance it deserves.

You’re the perfect member to maintain such a thread, will you please consider starting a thread on shungite? My online presence is too spotty to give regular updates but I have some good info to share to begin with and can give updates whenever I visit, so I would not abandon it altogether.

If you’re not interested in doing that I will, just thought I’d ask you first, for the above stated reasons.

Cheers mate.

The reason I avoid any "product" is when it is sold via my "tips/suggestions" even if I did not intend to sell anything ... people CAN be duped with false or exaggerated claims of people selling "EMF protection/shield" products .... I have been warning so many in my Stop5G Fb Group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) (33,200+ members) NOT to promote the selling any product ONLY real independent reviews are allowed.

That is why I avoid the shungite hype, some skeptics even claim I get "rich" selling fear porn ... NONE OF THAT IS TRUE!

Needles to say I will never create nor run such a "product" thread.

cheers,
John

Haha, definitely not the perfect person to start a shungite thread.

I completely agree with you, in fact those donkeys in the video who are selling those shungite products are what caused me to bring up the shungite thread topic here as a reply to you. What do you take me for, John! :D Not only am I not stupid enough to listen to people like that (I only buy it straight from Russia) but I buy extra for others and give it away (yes it’s that effective and IMO important).

Excuse me while a write a few words on shungite to clear this up a bit because people will benefit enormously from it and it would be detrimental to dismiss it after reading your post.

John is right, never listen to anyone’s claims who are selling shungite products because they either don’t know what they’re talking about or they’re scammers and exploiting the current situation, either way they can’t be trusted. The reason is because shungite is accessible and cheap and does all it needs to without being turned into products like powder blocks or whatever TF those clowns were making (powder is cheapest form BTW).

Shungite is the primary source of natural fullerenes (C60). Natural fullerenes are superior to synthetic fullerenes, far superior and much cheaper.

I saw a video of a medical doctor using a chunk of shungite to block the harmful radiation coming out of a router and decided to look into it. I came to learn of additional uses and amazing effects, actually pretty unbelievable effects and decided to see if it is real for myself. I am electrosensitive, 4G was bad enough, so I wanted to make sure my family and I were prepared for when 5G came on here. Also, a colleague who has had the shots went temporarily blind while working over a modem and I wanted to be able to help people protect themselves (temporary blindness has been reported as an adverse event).

I bought Regina Martini’s book, five type two stones and a mala from a store here in Australia to try it out and was delighted to find that shungite seemed to be all it’s cracked up to be. I then purchased enough of Shungite to try everything in the book.

So far it has cured my fiancé’s IBS in one week, it’s completely gone and he had suffered from it all his life. My son had been having problems with his digestive system which was also resolved in a week. I no longer suffer from electrosensitivity. Plants grew 50% larger after just one watering of shungite water. There are other effects but I’ll elaborate on that later (it accelerates everything good, like spiritual development).

People need to at least be made aware this exists with accurate information and have the opportunity to make an informed choice about whether to use it or not. People need to know what it can do, how to use it and where to purchase it (many frauds). Accounts from people with direct experience of it is best, which is mostly what I hope to gain out of a thread.

Thanks for your reply, John.

Nick Matkin

18th June 2022, 07:58

To understand how to block radio frequency signals coming out of any device, it really helps to have some knowledge about RF. Unfortunately these "Stop Harmful Radiation" products rely on the public's anxiety but lack of understanding. There is plenty of scientific, evidence-based data out there, but it isn't as interesting as someone unqualified in any relevant field flamboyantly pushing woo.

If these products worked they'd be used in industry, broadcasting and medicine to protect workers. The only way to shield from RF signals is to use a Faraday cage - any conducting metal (or sometimes carbon) earthed shield completely enveloping the device or person. Just placing anything in the RF field to "attract radiation" does nothing, and those out there peddling such stuff either are deliberately selling nonsense or just don't understand the subject. If they're taking money there's no excuse for either!

Nick

Edit: It would also help if people understood the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation. It's ionising radiation that's particularly dangerous. Electromagnetic radiation is non-ionising. The two types of radiation get (deliberately?) confused in these discussions which does not help understanding of the risks. We can do better...

Eric J (Viking)

27th June 2022, 19:30

Avalonians…Can someone confirm that this is correct. It’s above my understanding. On a telegram channel but not sure of validity.

********

60 Giga Hertz. ...... WI-Fi Frequency

That is all it takes .....

To make everyone drop dead like flies....

THE WARNING HAS BEEN TRUMPETED.

********

Viking

onawah

12th July 2022, 00:54

CHD Urges FCC to End Discrimination Against People Disabled by Electromagnetic Sensitivity
By Children's Health Defense Team
7/11/22
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/chd-fcc-electromagnetic-sensitivity-feature-800x417.jpg

"Children’s Health Defense led advocacy groups in replying to the Federal Communications Commission’s request for comments on preventing digital discrimination by urging the commission to accommodate the electromagnetically sensitive.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and a coalition of more than 80 nonprofits — including disability advocacy groups, safe technology groups and individuals — responded to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) request for comments on how to “prevent and eliminate digital discrimination.”

The June 30 “Reply Comments of Advocates for the EMS-Disabled” summarized more than 330 comments submitted by the public since the comment period opened on March 17.

In addition to calling for acceptance, affirmation and inclusion of people for whom electromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) is a disability, the June 30 reply comments made these two key points:

The FCC should always prioritize “to-the-premises” fiber solutions and rely on wireless only when wiring is technically or economically infeasible or the main purpose is mobility.
If the FCC is sincere about achieving “diversity, equity and inclusion,” it must recognize the specific and profoundly deleterious effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) on the EMS-disabled and take immediate measures within its regulatory remit to address and solve this growing plight.
The proceeding was required by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and President Biden’s Executive Order 13985 — “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.”

On May 16, CHD and 50 cosigners submitted comments accompanied by a white paper.

People who are electromagnetically sensitive, or EMS-disabled, suffer from a sensitivity to wireless radiation that makes living in a wireless world intolerable.

As of June 28, FCC Docket 22-69 listed 333 comments. Among the 333 comments, 65.17% stated they suffered from EMS disability or their family members and/or friends experienced symptoms of EMS or electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) or electrosensitivity.

More than 62% advocated that the EMS-disabled be accommodated with fiber to the premises and wireless-free zones, and 50.15% of respondents requested fiber to the premises.

EMS/EHS affects a growing segment of the population. Somewhere between 3% and 30% of the U.S. population, or between 9 million and 99 million people, are harmed by wireless technology.

Sensitivity to wireless technology usually is not limited to one device or one frequency.

EMS-disability is a constellation of neurological symptoms caused by sensitivity to cell phones, cell towers, smart meters, Wi-Fi and smart appliances.

EMS/EHS symptoms frequently include chronic headaches, cognitive impairment, extreme fatigue, trouble sleeping, ringing in the ears, rashes/hives, nausea, anxiety, depression and hyperactivity.

The U.S. Access Board, an independent federal agency that advises the government on guidelines for accommodation, recognized this disabling condition in 2002, and promised to develop accommodation guidelines but has failed to follow through.

“A rapidly increasing percentage of our population is suffering from a spectrum of EMS-disability,” said Mary Holland, CHD president and general counsel. “This condition and its disabling effects were acknowledged more than 20 years ago, but those who suffer are still not accepted by society, and are still routinely denied the accommodations they deserve.”

Holland added:

“There must be an allowance for radiofrequency radiation-free ‘safe zones’ in public spaces and buildings to ensure these individuals’ inclusion in public life. We must have fiber to and throughout the premises in every building accessed by the public, and fiber to the home in the United States.

“Refusing accommodation for this growing population of EMS-disabled is the direct opposite of the FCC’s stated goal of achieving diversity, equity and inclusion. The EMS-disabled cannot come to public meetings because of radiofrequency radiation saturation so we will advocate for them.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-fcc-digital-discrimination-electromagnetic-sensitivity-disabled/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=aa185666-d34b-4f2e-b4eb-25a6f7d23783

ExomatrixTV

21st July 2022, 19:17

New Review Paper On Health Risks From Living Near Cell Towers: Radiofrequency Sickness, Cancer, Changes In Biochemistry

https://cdn.nexusnewsfeed.com/images/2022/6/a-1658236109324.jpg?w=992&h=744

Submitted by Patricia Burke (https://www.naturalblaze.com/tag/patricia-burke) of Safe Tech International (https://safetechinternational.org/about/)

https://cdn.nexusnewsfeed.com/images/2022/6/res-1-1658236115314.png?w=992&h=744

Analysis by Joel M. Moskowitz (https://www.saferemr.com), Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley:

“Cell Tower Health Effects”

Federal regulations protect the public only from the thermal (i.e., heating) risk due to short-term exposure to high intensity, cell tower radiation. The Federal radio frequency exposure limits ignore the preponderance of peer-reviewed studies that has found harmful bio-effects from exposure to non-thermal levels of cell phone radiation.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not allow communities to stop the siting of cell towers for environmental or health reasons as long they comply with the weak radio frequency exposure limits established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The public needs to organize and change the Federal law to protect public health and wildlife from exposure to microwave radiation emitted by mobile phone base stations.
As of February 6, 2021, antennasearch.com (http://www.antennasearch.com), an industry website, reported 803,000 cell towers and 2.1 million cell antennas in the United States. Texas has the most cell towers (80,300), and California has the most cell antennas (151,000). We cannot verify the accuracy of these data because the FCC only collects data on certain types of cell towers. “

Balmori, A. Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer. Environmental Research (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113851.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to perform a complete review of the existing scientific literature to update the knowledge on the effects of base station antennas on humans. Studies performed in real urban conditions, with mobile phone base stations situated close to apartments, were selected. Overall results of this review show three types of effects by base station antennas on the health of people: radiofrequency sickness (RS), cancer (C) and changes in biochemical parameters (CBP). Considering all the studies reviewed globally (n=38), 73.6% (28/38) showed effects: 73.9% (17/23) for radiofrequency sickness, 76.9% (10/13) for cancer and 75.0% (6/8) for changes in biochemical parameters. Furthermore, studies that did not meet the strict conditions to be included in this review provided important supplementary evidence. The existence of similar effects from studies by different sources (but with RF [radio frequency radiation] of similar characteristics), such as radar, radio and television antennas, wireless smart meters and laboratory studies, reinforce the conclusions of this review. Of special importance are the studies performed on animals or trees near base station antennas that cannot be aware of their proximity and to which psychosomatic effects can never be attributed.

Excerpts

Introduction: During the last few decades, hundreds of thousands of mobile phone base stations and other types of wireless communications antennas have been installed around the world, in cities and in nature, including protected natural areas, in addition to pre-existing antennas (television, radio broadcasting, radar, etc.). Only the aesthetic aspects or urban regulations have been generally considered in this deployment, while the biological, environmental and health impacts of the associated non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation emissions have not been assessed so far. Therefore, the effects on humans living around these anthropogenic electromagnetic field sources (antennas) have not been considered.

In France, there is a significant contribution of mobile phone base stations in the exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) of urban citizens living nearby (De Giudici et al., 2021). Some studies from India indicate that more than 15% of people have levels of EMF strength above 12 V/m due to their proximity to antennas (Premlal and Eldhose, 2017). Exposure estimates have shown that RF-EMF from mobile telephone systems is stronger in urban than in rural areas. For instance, in Sweden the levels of RF radiation have increased considerably in recent years, both outdoor and indoor, due to new telecommunication technologies, and the median power density measured for RF fields between 30 MHz and 3 GHz was 16 μW/m2 in rural areas, 270 μW/m2 in urban areas and 2400 μW/m2 in city areas (Hardell et al., 2018). Total exposure varies not only between urban and rural areas but also, depending on residential characteristics, between different floors of a building, with a tendency for building exposure to increase at higher floors (Breckenkamp et al., 2012).

Over the past five decades, and more intensively since the beginning of this century, many studies and several reviews have been published on the effects of anthropogenic electromagnetic radiation on humans living around the antennas. The first studies were carried out with radio and television antennas, investigating increases in cancer and leukaemia (Milham, 1988; Maskarinec et al., 1994; Hocking et al., 1996; Dolk et al., 1997a, 1997b; Michelozzi et al., 1998; Altpeter et al., 2000), as well as around radars (Kolodynski and Kolodynska, 1996; Goldsmith, 1997).

Regarding base station antennas, there are scientific discrepancies in their effects: some studies concluded that there are no health-related effects (e.g. Augner and Hacker, 2009; Blettner et al., 2009; Röösli et al., 2010; Baliatsas et al., 2016) whereas others found increases in cancer and other health problems in humans living around antennas (e.g. Santini et al., 2002; Navarro et al., 2003; Bortkiewicz et al., 2004; Eger et al., 2004; Wolf and Wolf, 2004; Abdel-Rassoul et al., 2007; Khurana et al., 2010; Dode et al., 2011; Shinjyo and Shinjyo, 2014; Gandhi et al., 2015; López et al., 2021; Rodrigues et al., 2021). There is a specific symptomatology linked to radar and RF exposure at low levels, characterized by functional disturbances of the central nervous system (headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, appetite loss, difficulty in concentration, dizziness, etc.), that has been termed ‘RF sickness’ (Lilienfeld et al., 1978; Johnson Lyakouris, 1998; Navarro et al., 2003).

Methods

Only studies performed in real urban conditions, with mobile phone base stations situated close to apartments, were selected. Studies conducted in larger regions with numerous antennas, based on surveys and geographic data, were also included.
Results: The studies that met the selected criteria are presented in chronological order in Table 1, catalogued as Y/N depending on whether or not they found effects. The selected studies cover three types of effects: radiofrequency sickness (RS) (according to Lilienfeld et al., 1978; Johnson Lyakouris, 1998), cancer (C) and changes in biochemical parameters (CBP). Table 1 also includes the authors, year and country, antenna type, study design, diseases and symptoms found/not found and the main conclusions of each study.

Discussion

Considering all the selected studies (n=38), 73.6% (28/38) showed effects: 73.9% (17/23) for radiofrequency sickness, 76.9% (10/13) for cancer and 75.0% (6/8) for changes in biochemical parameters (Figure 1). Therefore, most of the studies carried by research groups from twenty different countries reach the same conclusions.
For the reasons previously explained, the following studies (n=85) were not considered in this review, even though the conclusions of some of these studies will be discussed later due to their importance regarding the similarities of the electromagnetic radiation types involved and the effects found in many case.

The results of this review show three types of effects by base station antennas on the health of humans: radiofrequency sickness, cancer and changes in biochemical parameters (Fig. 1).

From among all these studies, most of them found effects (73.6%). Thus, despite some limitations and differences in study design, statistical measures, risk estimates and exposure categories (Khurana et al., 2010), together they provide a consistent view of the effects on the health of people living in the vicinity of base station antennas.

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP (https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/msm-pushes-bogus-radiation-watchdog-icnirp-2020-safety-guidelines-not-safety-standards-backed-by-evidence/)) is a private organization that issues exposure guidelines that are then adopted by governments, but it has been accused of having conflicts of interest (Hardell and Carlberg, 2020; Hardell et al., 2021).

The ICNIRP (https://stop5g-resistance.whynotnews.eu/5g-accountability/msm-pushes-bogus-radiation-watchdog-icnirp-2020-safety-guidelines-not-safety-standards-backed-by-evidence/) (2010, 2020) limits are thousands of times above the levels where effects are recorded for both extremely low frequency and RF man-made EMF and account only for thermal effects, whereas the vast majority of recorded effects are non-thermal. These existing guidelines for public health protection only consider the effects of acute intense (thermal) exposures and do not protect from lower level long-term exposures

(Israel et al., 2011; Yakimenko et al., 2011; Blank et al., 2015; Starkey, 2016; Belpomme and Irigaray, 2022). The exposure duration is crucial to assess the induced effects.

Conclusion

In the current circumstances, it seems that the scientific experts in the field are very clear about the serious problems we are facing and have expressed this through important appeals (Blank et al., 2015; Hardell and Nyberg, 2020). However, the media, the responsible organizations (World Health Organization, 2015) and the governments are not transmitting this crucial information to the population, who remain uninformed. For these reasons, the current situation will probably end in a crisis not only for health but also for the technology itself, as it is unsustainable and harmful to the environment and the people.

source (https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/new-review-paper-on-health-risks-from-living-near-cell-towers-radiofrequency-sickness-cancer-changes-in-biochemistry)

onawah

24th July 2022, 02:28

'The CCP Uses America's Culture Against Us': Jon Pelson on China's Huawei Threat
1,793 views 7/23/22
249
China in Focus - NTD
699K subscribers
⭕ Watch the full episode on EpochTV 👉 https://ept.ms/Chinas5GThreat_FULL

"In this special episode, we sat down with Jon Pelson, author of "Wireless Wars: China’s Dangerous Domination of #5G and How We’re Fighting Back." He spoke about the United States investigating Huawei over its equipment being built near missile and #Nuclear facilities, the dangers to national security, and what steps need to be taken to stem that threat."

VsYXsSGDYOA

More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-ccp-uses-americas-culture-against-us-jon-pelson-on-chinas-huawei-threat_4616492.html?&utm_medium=ChinaInFocus&utm_source=YouTube&utm_campaign=Chinas5GThreat&utm_content=07-23-2022

"In this special episode, we sat down with Jon Pelson, author of “Wireless Wars: China’s Dangerous Domination of 5G and How We’re Fighting Back.” He spoke about the United States investigating Huawei over its equipment being built near missile and nuclear facilities, the dangers to national security, and what steps need to be taken to stem that threat.

As for why Huawei is a security risk, Pelson said: “So if you make the equipment that goes into a cell tower, Huawei’s not running that network, but they made the equipment, and you never let your hands off of equipment. When you install it, whether it’s for Verizon or AT&T or whether it’s for a rural family-owned company like this, the company that built it has to keep an eye on it and make sure they’re giving software updates, that if there’s a service problem, they can look at the box itself and fix it remotely, you know. Huawei’s not going to fly someone all the way across the world to fix a remote cell tower, so it’s remotely controlled. And so when you have that, you can tell, even if you can’t eavesdrop on what’s being said over the connections—and that’s a possibility; whether or not they can isn’t clear—you can tell through something called metadata. You can tell who’s there on the base that day, who are they calling—so you know the numbers called in and out, you know who they text, you know where they are, you can tell the volume, you can see if there’s a lot of activity going on. If you’ve got a Navy SEAL base—and there’s Huawei equipment around our Navy SEAL bases—and you see there’s suddenly there’s a surge of activity, and these senior people from the Pentagon are now on that SEAL base—because you can tell who’s there, remember that.

“Maybe you can’t hear what they’re saying, but you say, ‘Why are these people at that base?’ A geopolitical rival or an enemy can say, ‘We can tell that America is getting ready to do something.’ And you also have the possibility of saying, ‘We’re going to send a signal out here, and now that cell site’s not going to work so well.’ The vast majority of military communications go over the public network, not over end-to-end Department of Defense networks. And so … the company running the equipment has the possibility of being able to deactivate it or throttle it, which in a time of crisis would be very damaging, very dangerous.” "

ExomatrixTV

29th July 2022, 14:28

Town Wins in Court, Stops 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) Cell Tower Installation in Residential Neighborhood!

https://www.activistpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Firefighter-cell-tower.jpg (https://www.activistpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Firefighter-cell-tower.jpg)

Opposition to 5G and 4G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) cell tower deployment and densification continues to increase worldwide. Decades of research has already proven that exposure to radiation from cell towers (https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-on-cell-tower-radiation-and-health/) as well as other sources of wireless radiation is biologically harmful. People in the U.S. and worldwide continue to report symptoms and illnesses after 5G and/or 4G infrastructure has been installed and activated near them (see 1 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/07/residents-sick-from-church-steeple-cell-tower-new-radiation-readings-show-a-three-times-increase-compared-with-the-previous-analysis.html), 2 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/06/board-of-health-withdraws-cease-and-desist-order-on-cell-tower-thats-making-residents-sick-after-verizon-gets-legal.html), 3 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/01/sick-people-sick-pets-homes-put-up-for-sale-revisiting-nyc-in-2018-when-verizon-activated-5g.html), 4 (https://www.activistpost.com/2019/11/patriots-captain-has-never-seen-so-much-illness-among-players-could-it-be-from-verizon-operating-5g-at-their-stadium.html), 5 (https://www.activistpost.com/2019/09/switzerland-sick-of-and-sick-from-5g-nationwide-revolt-planned-for-september-21.html), 6 (https://www.activistpost.com/2019/07/youtube-terminates-account-of-sacramento-family-fighting-verizon-5g-small-cell-tower-installed-next-to-childrens-bedroom.html)). Some are taking legal action to deactivate towers and stop deployment (see 1 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/07/court-decides-property-owners-who-rent-space-to-telecoms-can-be-held-liable-for-health-impacts-cell-towers-antennas-germany.html), 2 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/07/webinar-promotes-appeal-to-stop-5g-deployment-in-europe-1000000-signatures-needed.html), 3, (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/05/cell-tower-turned-off-by-court-after-farmer-complained-that-its-radiation-was-damaging-his-cows-health.html) 4 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/05/court-of-appeals-approves-anti-5g-groups-case-against-uk-govt.html)). Kudos to the folks in Mahopac, NY for stopping a cell tower for being installed in their neighborhood.

From Inside Towers: (https://insidetowers.com/new-york-town-of-mahopac-wins-legal-battle-over-cell-tower-placement/)

New York Town of Mahopac Wins Legal Battle Over 5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) Cell Tower Placement

UPDATE (https://bit.ly/3zuXKZt) Residents in the hamlet of Mahopac within the town of Carmel, NY took their fight against Verizon Wireless to court. As the Westchester Journal News reports, State Supreme Justice Thomas Davis agreed with the plaintiff’s grievances. He held that the town of Carmel entered into an unlawful agreement with Homeland Towers to build a 140 foot cell tower in a residential neighborhood. The judge found that the dealings were not conducted in a transparent manner, and were influenced by a voting member who stood to gain financially from the arrangement.

“We do not agree with the State Judge’s decision,” Manuel Vicente, President of Homeland told Inside Towers, “and will continue to vigorously pursue our legal options in our efforts to bring critical wireless infrastructure and service to the residents of Carmel.”

In a close vote to approve the cell tower construction, Town Board member Frank Lombardi voted in favor of the cell tower plan. However, as a member of the Maple Estate homeowners association, he was part of the HOA group slated to earn $18,000 per year for the land lease.

“He should have disclosed his interest and recused himself from the Town Board’s vote,” Judge Davis stated.

“It’s unfortunate that the residents of Walton Drive had to take legal action against Homeland Towers and the town,” said former Town Supervisor, Ken Schmitt, who helped facilitate the original agreement. “I’m glad the residents prevailed. I could have done a better job, doing a deeper dive into the terms of the settlement. I fault myself,” he told the Westchester Journal News.

“Five of us kicked in to pay the lawyer,” said town resident Rob Cavallaro. “There’s a small balance we are still paying. It hurts. But something had to be done. And hopefully Homeland Towers goes away.”

Verizon Wireless and Homeland Towers have challenged earlier versions of this plan, running into obstacles with placement and zoning. There has thus far been no official response to Mahopac’s recent legal victory.

In 2021 a federal court ruled in favor of organizations and petitioners (https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/) that sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for NOT adequately protecting Americans (https://ehtrust.org/policy/fcc-safety-standards/) from wireless radiation exposure. Despite the ruling, the FCC (see 1 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/fcc-gathering-info-on-wireless-receiver-performance-hasnt-done-squat-in-re-lawsuit-it-lost-for-not-updating-wireless-exposure-limits.html), 2 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/despite-warnings-and-opposition-amazon-approved-for-launching-3236-broadband-satellites.html), 3 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/group-asks-fcc-other-federal-agencies-to-pause-satellite-launches-for-180-days-and-conduct-proper-risk-assessment.html), 4 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/fcc-considers-issuing-new-rules-for-wireless-receivers-to-prevent-future-conflicts.html), 5 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/02/d-c-court-denies-petition-challenging-fcc-otard-rule-private-property-owners-can-install-5g-base-stations-w-o-permits.html), 6 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/01/fcc-provides-361m-more-in-broadband-funding-4-2b-provided-so-far-even-though-americans-already-paid-for-broadband.html), 7 (https://www.activistpost.com/2021/12/court-rules-against-petitioners-who-say-unlicensed-6ghz-band-users-could-cause-harmful-interference-issues-with-fixed-wi-fi.html), 8 (https://www.activistpost.com/2021/12/utility-groups-others-petition-fcc-to-delay-opening-6ghz-band-to-block-6g-consumer-electronics-that-will-threaten-public-safety.html)) as well as other government and state agencies and committees (see 1 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/05/dod-launches-new-5g-smart-warehouse-network-at-naval-base.html), 2 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/gop-committee-leaders-on-spending-billions-for-broadband-recommend-avoiding-overbuilding-existing-networks.html), 3 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/dod-and-ntia-team-up-to-launch-5g-challenge-event-with-total-prize-purse-of-up-to-3-million-to-contestants.html), 4, 5 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/biden-proposes-adding-600m-more-to-the-2b-recently-allocated-for-usda-rural-utilities-broadband-program.html), 6 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/following-the-money-billions-already-given-to-telecoms-that-deliberately-created-the-digital-divide-continue-to-harm-americans.html), 7 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/02/u-s-govt-commits-to-keep-funding-companies-that-created-the-digital-divide-and-have-been-harming-americans.html)) continue to promote and fund the deployment and densification of both 5G and 4G cell towers (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/study-reveals-high-radiation-levels-on-streets-where-5g-and-4g-cell-towers-are-installed.html) and other wireless infrastructure. American businesses and school districts (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/05/225000-5g-and-4g-small-cells-activated-for-private-networks-at-u-s-businesses-school-campuses-some-installed-indoors.html) continue to install 5G, 4G, and Wi-Fi for “private networks” as well. Additionally, catastrophic aviation safety risks from 5G activation have still not been resolved (see 1 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/06/airlines-group-argues-5g-filters-not-enough-significant-bleed-over-to-the-radio-altimeter-band-is-inevitable.html), 2 (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/06/u-s-aviation-safety-risks-and-5g-the-problems-havent-been-solved.html)). The Department of Defense (DoD) is trying to mitigate military radar interference risks (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/07/dod-tech-companies-partnering-to-mitigate-potential-military-radar-interference-with-5g-networks.html) with 5G as well.
35ETt8NVQfo
LZLbcOHpns8
cVur1Nbzwbo
Qb42IZrMwFg
Activist Post reports regularly about cell towers and unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives (https://www.activistpost.com/tag/cell-towers) and the following websites.

Americans for Responsible Technology (https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/)
Environmental Health Trust (http://ehtrust.org/)
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety (http://www.saferemr.com)
Physicians for Safe Technology (https://mdsafetech.org/)
Safe Tech International (https://stop5ginternational.org/)
Wireless Information Network (http://www.win19.org)

source (https://www.activistpost.com/2022/07/town-wins-in-court-stops-cell-tower-installation-in-residential-neighborhood.html)

Article (https://www.frontnieuws.com/v-s-rechtbank-stopt-installatie-van-gevaarlijke-5g-celtorens-ze-zijn-gevaarlijk-voor-de-menselijke-gezondheid) (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
Facebook.com/groups/Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g)

Gwin Ru

30th July 2022, 13:14

“The sky is falling! The sky is falling!” cried Chicken Little (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=256733)

by tts-admin (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?author=39262) | Jul 29, 2022

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Texel-Island-June-2022.jpg
Texel Island early June 2022

And the sky fell, and no one listened, and all was still.

Arthur Firstenberg – Cell Phone Task Force July 28, 2022

A scholarly literature search (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/1xXsDfHEK6vuRzN23kNjMTKAWpVEH1sHiW9r3a3QPzmmenhQAtVe3CYf_MDlW-e6VwqcCcyXoYUI9rlvcM4G75U0Miaui34mK6aVZxHJoJ2QPbXyeTg8YYjB0RdynBMyOmG6LTSBWUw8IS3-0Lxio9E759iNz1wlxtDOg6lZo-BEDoZLxlPGpCEOm_9eqXrArNj0NBR%20) for “electromagnetic” + “biological effects” produces the astonishing number of 76,400 studies, more studies than for most other environmental threats, yet the world continues on, looking yet blind, listening yet deaf, mistaking silence for comfort, the advancing flames for a bright future.

On the Dutch island of Texel, being the south end of a line of islands separating the Wadden Sea from the North Sea, a large breeding colony of seabirds called Sandwich terns (“great terns” in Dutch) made headline news last month by dying. Of the 7,000 birds nesting in the De Petten nature reserve until the end of May, none were left by the middle of June. 3,000 avian corpses were collected, and the rest either died or abandoned their nests.

The correspondent who sent me this news, Antonia in the Netherlands, also sent me to a Dutch website (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/Ss0a5pWm9_sPQs7iMlElFWvVlqkCUNdLRf8uZGcwCzN4oC5PXrCKCTSPYlS-KBgeTW5flE2VnXK00ipcUJgJ0q9qx3xXogrpLW5FOf9OmWL74PB-8aFXYxSv8tK2uElUCrgngq9eIHbGgSwbPFVPhQTkSSm63ddneIQJP1K-84KFb8_rFsG_icu5tKRpfUNjODBFvN5%20) that monitors all cell towers and antennas throughout the country. The tern catastrophe was being blamed on “bird flu” and she suspected something else might be going on. When I looked at the website I was floored. The first 35 dead terns at De Petten were found on May 29, 2022. There are three cell towers on the edge of the reserve, and actually in the territory which the terns inhabit. According to the website, 18 new 4G antennas had just been added to those towers — 6 by Vodafone to its 83-foot tower on May 25, 2022, and 12 by KPN to its 108-foot tower on May 29, 2022. The number of frequencies emitted by those two towers had increased overnight from 5 to 11.

In addition to having all those antennas right at the reserve, De Petten is located on the northern edge of a waterway that separates the North Sea from the Wadden Sea, and a large number of antennas on both sides of that waterway — the antennas in Den Helden to the south and the antennas on Texel to the north — are aimed at that busy waterway, which is intensely used by the ships that continually pass through it. Consequently, according to my research, there are a total of 105 4G antennas within 7 miles of De Petten that are aimed directly at it.

Were Texel’s Sandwich terns already in bad shape from all the radiation they had been exposed to in the last few years? And did the sudden increase in both the number of antennas and the number of frequencies finally kill them?

I decided to investigate further. What I have discovered, both in the Netherlands and elsewhere, is consistent but not simple. Here are some rough rules:
(a) A sudden dramatic increase in the number of antennas and frequencies whose source is within a breeding colony or on its border is lethal. Nesting birds cannot avoid the radiation; they must either abandon their nests or die.

(b) The effect of antennas aimed at a breeding colony from a distance depends on the human population. In a sparsely populated region, the antennas emit little radiation and few frequencies because few people are using them. By contrast, cell towers located in major ports are heavily used, both by residents and ships, and emit maximal radiation. The same is true of antennas aimed at heavily used shipping lanes.

(c) Distance does not matter as much as terrain and tower height. The radiation from a taller tower travels further. And when there is nothing but water between the tower and the bird colony, the water reflects and amplifies the signal and distance matters very little.

(d) 4G towers are generally worse than 5G towers. This is because 4G towers broadcast their radiation in all directions while 5G towers emit most of their radiation in focused beams, aimed directly at people holding 5G phones in their hands.
With these rules in mind, let us look at a few other breeding colonies of Sandwich terns and see what has happened to them this year:

Another large breeding colony of Sandwich terns made headlines a bit later, and for the same reason: the one at Waterdunen, at the opposite end of the Netherlands, in Zeeland province. Like De Petten, the Waterdunen nature reserve is located on a busy shipping lane at the entrance to a busy port. The largest colony of these birds in the Netherlands, Waterdunen hosted 7,000 pairs of terns that flew up from Africa to breed there this spring. But on June 24, 2022, it was reported that 4,600 dead adult and young Sandwich terns had been collected there during the previous two weeks. By the end of June, this colony no longer existed either.

The nature reserve at Waterdunen has 318 heavily-used 4G antennas aimed in its direction from distances of from 0.5 to 8 miles. Most of these emit between 1,000 and 2,000 watts of radiation each. 46 of these antennas are new, having been added to existing towers in April, May and June 2022. One 55-foot tower less than 2 miles down the beach from Waterdunen was upgraded on May 18, 2022 from 6 antennas to 12 and from 2 frequencies to 4. Another, 40-foot tower in the same location was upgraded on June 22, 2022 from 6 antennas to 18 and from 2 frequencies to 6. As Sandwich terns live on fish, that tower is within the foraging area for that colony.

Did the same thing happen to all nesting Sandwich terns in the Netherlands? No. Just 20 miles from Waterdunen was a small, healthy colony of terns at a nature reserve called Yerseke Moer. And from April to July, i.e. throughout the 2022 nesting season, this colony thrived and no dead birds were found there. Unlike De Petten and Waterdunen, this reserve is located in a relatively isolated place, is not near a major port and is not on a shipping lane. A total of 35 4G antennas are aimed at this reserve from distances of up to 8 miles. Only two of those antennas have been added since April.

Likewise in France, two very large colonies of terns had two completely different experiences. At the Platier d’Oye nature reserve near the port of Calais, a colony of 3,000 Sandwich terns began nesting in April. The first 100 dead birds were discovered on May 20, and within a few weeks the colony was almost completely wiped out.

The situation at Platier d’Oye is similar to that further north in Texel: dozens of new 4G and 5G antennas were added near the reserve during the months of May and June. 3 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 90-foot cell tower bordering the reserve. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 140-foot tower about two miles to the southeast. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 95-foot tower about two miles to the east. At this writing there are the astounding number of 355 antennas of all kinds on 26 towers at 13 locations ranging from 10 feet tall to 255 feet tall within about 4 miles of this nature reserve.

An even larger colony — the largest breeding colony of Sandwich terns in France — had no disease during the 2022 breeding season.

It is called the Polder de Sébastopol and was host to several thousand pairs of nesting birds. But like Yerseke Moer, it is on an isolated island with few human residents. The island’s land area is largely devoted to parks, nature reserves and visitor accommodations. None of the antennas on the two cell towers a half mile west of the Polder are aimed at it. And even though there are a large number of antennas between one and four miles away that are aimed directly at the Polder, no ships pass by offshore and those antennas are little used except by visitors to the reserve walking its trails.

Looking at the details and different experiences at particular breeding colonies of these birds, the official story breaks down. How can one make sense of the extermination of so many of these birds in a matter of a few weeks in such widely scattered places? According to the bird conservation organizations, bird flu is so contagious that it spreads among Sandwich terns all over Europe in a matter of days, yet it is so non-contagious that a small colony of terns 20 miles away escapes scot-free. Bird flu travels from one end of the Netherlands to the other in a few days, but not between two Dutch colonies 20 miles apart, and not between the two largest colonies in France?

Apparently the conservation organizations also do not think it strange that suddenly and for the first time ever, in 2022, bird flu is (a) killing Sandwich terns and (b) is occurring during their breeding season. In decades of monitoring them, bird flu has never affected Sandwich terns before anywhere in the world. And it has always been a seasonal disease, occurring only in autumn and winter, and has never before affected any types of wild birds in spring and summer until 2022. It has also never affected so many different kinds of wild birds at once — terns, seagulls, avocets, gannets, skuas, guillemots, puffins, oystercatchers, ducks, geese, godwits, pheasants, magpies, sanderlings, storks, cranes, pelicans, herons, swans, loons, sparrows, pigeons, red-winged blackbirds, owls, cormorants, grebes, dunlins, crows, ravens, bald eagles, hawks, falcons, vultures. Both the bird organizations and the authorities are reacting reflexively by wearing masks and hazmat suits when they visit these colonies and handle dead birds. But they should begin questioning the cause of such an unprecedented catastrophe.

There is no doubt that sick birds have tested positive for a virus called H5N1. But when every testing laboratory is constantly amplifying fragments of that virus in untold numbers of PCR tests, one has to suspect that the walls, floors, air, equipment, and personnel in the testing laboratories are contaminated with this virus. When one remembers that samples from a goat, a quail and a papaya, sent to the National Health Laboratory of Tanzania, all came back positive for COVID-19, the results of PCR tests, whether for people, birds, or fruit, should be regarded with caution. Yes, both birds and people are getting sick and dying, but there is another obvious factor that is being ignored. The tendency to blame all illness on microorganisms is destroying our world.

It is the uncontrolled irradiation of our world that is killing us and wiping out all the birds. Both 4G and 5G antennas are being erected more quickly and in greater numbers than ever before, not only on land but even on the surface of the sea. Wherever there are offshore wind farms, the cell phone companies are placing cell towers on those platforms. Seabirds will soon not only have no place to lay their eggs and raise their young, but they will not even be able to hunt for their food and feed their young without being irradiated. The largest company building cell towers on the surface of the sea is called Tampnet. Here is a map of all their towers and their coverage areas in the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico: https://www.tampnet.com/coverage-maps (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/QPmn27J9BZ4nNrzIGvDkLYdeOhBHMzTIxt4JlPGbMnbbnSI8H2s5Vr436b40y64wVkSOlsRNsaFjVC_akVSCTuQDunJPM5e9orBz ugZx5b5Uocc0Q7dR0trmk457MdPpfAnCWc7TZ69OQrBs8G1mMV9Jh19M6_6U9h5sBehParDU2QDoY94y7ZYFydoFS3AHwpdEgsx% 20)

In 1918, at the very height of the Spanish influenza, attempts by medical teams in Boston and San Francisco to demonstrate the contagious nature of the flu met with complete and resounding failure. They collected mucous secretions from the mouths, noses, throats, and bronchi of sick flu patients in various stages of the disease and transferred these secretions to the noses, throats, and eyes of hundreds of healthy volunteers. They injected blood from sick flu patients into healthy volunteers. The had healthy volunteers sit nose to nose with severely ill flu patients while they spoke to each other and then the patient coughed five times directly in the face of the volunteer. None of the volunteers got sick in any way. These experiments were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/xfOj2GObzwOI7OZZENnF_LAm1yqz7CWzGxlWTQlI_3q0uzh_bPaaZOtsMySp0VwbJo0rLouWnvYhW51sFvtKR-wfd9c9I6twXqXAWKlq6fcRhhwxxLewXWBnuDTerDDWWPddcnvWDUV5iZlQgUerB0CqAtHz8LEYroDYE6jJfJcnF2NQd-GXdUUhBxcchqjVdtlVvfc%20), the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/x09QjlH00TB341Nt7jTXAr7hrJK_wFttRVWQDOSZg4xknd7laNidpjz2Tca4kEonDrKAGFSdyBp5Jf9tmLio2nvDHlitbmcvRyhV hMFw3QO1v_RpymCCnxrcgRXA6BRW4dHwhQp1CqKmM-RFoglFQ7htZYq_QMmc0p_a1T0tUTMQ07eomtf0SmnplmHZPGQgZhzpJ0C%20), and Public Health Reports (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/PHfdyIwZVvuHdStuDOP2H1Lx5r3DprL71e-LuYCSqjNp7oPdvvuWvttDF_ptJZ0LHV2Hi0I5bEt2NIAw2s02cCgMOsXECuidVsdxj4vMbID1svt5fOiKPS7ZffBGEkGzyN8-xjsfl-RvWmjgKnkj7XzTrrNcDPta8vRDAV5UDq2U9CLsp19DwNJneTdFndUXLxTS04r%20).

Horses also came down with influenza, and similar failure attended attempts to transfer influenza from one horse to another. As a result of these experiments, Lieutenant Colonel Herbert Watkins-Pitchford wrote (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/9YIHKZJ_IczRVrJgUK1mDoqmvvqiZFUBmKOKD_B-2_0czCMnRi2LgkIrD9xEcEvOw_4vjMxktt3ShjjJD8XGpuFjx4l69VvEEI-A6d_K3JVKSjhv2R0Ne5WLMQBFQxn-80dHR2zCUqvXMaQWgvnu5jdFovfEfRSLN0RW1hN5KhWOGMIbaBR72amtiRiqzWxbQMfY-ih%20) that he could find no evidence that influenza was ever spread directly from one horse to another.

Many are the scientists, over the years, who have observed that influenza, whether in humans, horses, birds, or pigs, is an exceedingly strange disease. No one has ever explained why the flu is seasonal, for example. Or why flu epidemics end. Or why out-of-season epidemics do not spread. Or why flu epidemics explode over whole countries at once, and disappear just as miraculously, as if suddenly prohibited. Or how human influenza can spread around the world in days, and has always done so, even centuries ago when neither airplanes, automobiles, railroads, nor steamships existed. At least 23 scientists over the years, including Richard Shope, the scientist who first identified the flu virus in 1931, have published papers questioning the contagious nature of the flu and/or suggesting an electrical cause for it.

Chapters 7, 8 and 9 of my critically important book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/Rn8imUIkaCcEYvBZsyi-vjB0hTiZNSSy0fg5mmgPv9EiksnaHw2G4pbT4XD99J-Z1Gx7cC2eUYPRpgfcku_I9pQJYWftyFkF-pTTVpw_L3n1f9-r9t-l7XEZTQezqFqBL9mNQtBGG3LNUFozN0jJEGVOt_IafumD_UM1oek5TGvdLE1GDt3O_iZXN7jT0IqaW8AFd8z%20), are devoted to a complete, detailed examination of the history and science of influenza. Chapter 16, the longest chapter in the book, is devoted in part to the effects of electromagnetic radiation on birds. I suggest that all bird conservation organizations should acquire my book and read it carefully

Arthur Firstenberg, President

Cellular Phone Task Force

P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org

July 28, 2022

The last 44 newsletters, including this one, are available for viewing on the Newsletters page (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/MXuUmK5nINV3F47eyW10PRA8SgrD_hv1AoPKM8PlCTth23iaYfwniFtIQ872IWjULDWbtU6r4Aa8RhVP_01n2dynObzmHwkW2S7J VzgdAHDHapF7KLADyrfYJtAqo473SDgwQvHedsheIsvTQ3IzL6nfDttCaxTKocT_eyqdyWjMH8TQfVeEXDQPtMp6R4osPxTdw8_% 20) of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, French, Norwegian, and Dutch. To share as PDF: Birds on Texel Island (http://r.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/mk/cl/f/KIiyBt5fddtA0iXLo3ReVc66kgYOgPur4btowycGDZhjiq7jzhH5-GAwnSQ_-sHjMSAAkdn7sK1EJj4glWVQnnjIuTWn6N_PIGs8TQSIzaMHD9mj-o9bKtk_h7NDMT_JkuLkWi7my8aiqN5GBHc2seZzA7p__E1SRlZZ3Dsy1offCx4HPPq1gu2qyI9VzK06It5b4qN%20).

Source (https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Birds-on-Texel-Island.pdf)

ExomatrixTV

1st August 2022, 13:04

European Citizens’ Initiative Project: “Stay Connected But Protected”:

hRLYwV9z2io
Webinar to Promote the European Citizens’ Initiative Project: “Stay Connected But Protected” July 17, 2022.

The European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) Stop5G Project was launched in March 2022, and has one year to gather a million signatures from across Europe. If successful, the European Commission and Parliament will be obliged to address the proposals that the EU enact regulations to protect health, nature, the environment and privacy.

Safe Tech International hosted this webinar to help “get the word out” about this critical and potentially life-changing Appeal, and to ensure that the 27 European countries who collaborated on this effort, reach their goal of 1,000,000 signatures by March, 2023.

Promotional video for the European Citizens’ Initiative Project Stop5G.
2tq9w1fsMRY

To sign the European Citizens’ Initiative or to learn more about it, please go to,

SignStop5G.eu (https://signstop5g.eu)
facebook.com/groups/Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g)

ExomatrixTV

16th August 2022, 19:19

5G plus?

xcQ3UEha30Kk

ExomatrixTV

30th August 2022, 17:23

Weapons Research Scientist Tells All: World Government Weaponized 5G And Radiation For Vaxxed

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/R/v/i/u/Rviuf.gaa.mp4

source (https://www.stewpeters.com/video/2022/08/weapons-research-scientist-tells-all-world-government-weaponized-5g-and-radiation-for-vaxxed)

ExomatrixTV

13th September 2022, 22:00

South Carolina Statehouse Testimony on 5G

fjQIr7b1g4s

ExomatrixTV

20th September 2022, 03:10

5G Tech is not insured!

https://alive528.com/videos/video_220919092443_vc0b5/video_220919092443_vc0b5_SD.mp4

source (https://alive528.com/v/16720)

ExomatrixTV

29th September 2022, 12:24

VfD2N7zgf4NK

ExomatrixTV

29th September 2022, 14:22

614265827003046

source (https://www.facebook.com/100084200030957/videos/614265827003046)

Water before and after 5G frequencies.

The Human body is 60% Water (https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/water-you-water-and-human-body) overall.
If 5G is changing the crystallography of water what is it doing to us? https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/tec/1.5/16/1f627.png

onawah

14th October 2022, 20:57

How the jabs and 5G work together
Note this especially: “All products for COVID-19; it’s in the patents, it’s on the World Health Organization – so not just the vaxxines but all the tests, all the treatments, all can be inoculated with this parasite. So every COVID-19 product needs to be banned, recalled and if anyone is using it, it should be considered an act of crime, of attempted murder, because that is what it is.

“Lastly, we need to make a movement to take down the technology. 5G and Starlink have nothing to do with helping humanity. If you go to CloudMinds’ SEC filing, they clearly state that their new 5G species; its functionality, its ability to communicate and its ability to spread is based on 5G technology.

“CloudMinds is an AI technology company based out of China whose endgame operations are for Chinese military operation use. They are a threat to national security and they need the 5G towers that we’ve put up all across this country for our convenience. No. It’s not for our convenience. It’s for our extermination."

Ever wondered why Dr Robert Malone got to sit in with Rogan ( the limited hangout podcast specialist ) ? . . . And Dr Peter McCullough, the man who can convince anybody we are dealing with a virus and a failed vaccine ?

Strap yourself in, for a wild ride, as Keren Kingston pulls out all the stops. Clue, she doesn't trust Dr Robert Malone.

She may have a few little things wrong, but I think she's a dog that's got the rabbit.

Karen Kingston - PROOF COVID Is A Nano-weapon PARASITE & Vaxx Are Biosynthetic Parasites Part 1

https://rumble.com/v1ntoms-must-watch-part1-proof-covid-is-a-parasite-and-vaxx-are-biosynthetic-parasi.html

Karen Kingston joins Stew Peters to discuss how she’s discovered the whole lie behind COVID-19.

She says, “the greatest lie that we were told is that the “novel coronavirus”…COVID-19 was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, this mRNA gain-of-function virus.

“And we were told that it could infect people and it was highly-infectious. Unfortunately for people that have been propagating this lie, the body of scientific evidence, scientific experts, government documents and the inventor of SARS-CoV-2, himself, Ralph Baric has clearly stated that, all mRNA viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 are impossible to achieve human-to-human infection.

“And the evidence comes from Ralph Baric, he published in 2016 in PNAS, where he published that he had done an abundant amount of research on his entire database of bar coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, which produces the WIV1 spike protein and he said, ‘Look, if we can even get it into a human body, it immediately becomes impotent. It’s weakened and useless, so we need to do further adaptations to make it of pandemic potential.

“The head of mRNA research and vaccines at Sanofi, the largest vaccine company in the world; this man is an expert, this man is Frank DeRosa, has said, ‘mRNA will fall apart if you look at it wrong.’

“In Chemical Engineering News, they talk about this breakthrough lipid nanoparticle technology, because for over 30 years, mRNA was considered and SARS viruses were considered a lame duck invention.

“There’s also a publication from 2017 in Nature Biotechnology – and this is the real kicker, Stew – in that publication, of this peer-review publication of experts in mRNA technology, they state that no RNA viruses, including mRNA can ever infect ANY cell, because o the 4 billion-year evolutionary defense of the lipid biolayer.

“It was always a lie that this virus could infect humans and be transmissable and I have all the documentation to prove it.

“So the question is are the experts that are telling us this is transmissable – are we to trust them? Or are we going to trust the body of evidence that we’re showing your viewers? We’ve been gaslit.

“The greatest stunt, trick the Devil ever did was teaching the world he didn’t exist. We’ve been gaslit and distracted by this concept of a coronavirus that’s infectious and everyone that’s come forward to validate the experts and the witnesses that you’ve had on your show saying, ‘Hey, people are magnetic. People are having weird neurological and CNS dysfunctions.’

“We’re looking underneath the microscope to see these self-assembling nanotechnologies. We’re looking under the microscope of people who have been injected and their self-assembling nano-technologies and we’re ignoring the evil, itself.

“Why are we being gaslit about a virus that is clinically, statistically, evolutionarily and scientifically impossible to infect people and not talking about the Artificial Intelligence nanoweapon that’s been unleashed on the American People?

“And by the way, the spike protein is actually matches up with the CAD file – the Computer-Animated Design files – in three patents for a nanoweapon technology that is made from Artificial Intelligence magnetic hydrogels.”

Stew then asks her if it’s not a virus and it’s not contagious, then how were people getting sick?

Karen responds, “They were getting sick with an Artificial Intelligence nanoweapon…Let me explain what it is, first…If you go through the research for mRNA and Professor Catherine Whitehead from Carnegie-Mellon, head of chemical engineering she had said, ‘Look, we can’t do anything with mRNA technology. We can’t even do research in vitro, outside of the cells, in the labs, it’s so unstable. We have to do the genetic editing technology of the technology inside the cells, inside the animals. mRNA can only be successful if the genetic editing is done by nanotechnology inside the cells, inside the animals.’

“So, what the spike protein is is this lipid nanoparticle; it’s a magnetized lipid nanoparticle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_nanoparticles), it’s called an MPEG that has the CRISPR-Cas9 technology and something called a ‘cubisome’. And the AI nanoweapon…looks just like the spike protein. And those spikes are actually probes that actually penetrate the cells.

“So, they look like cholesterol and per Ralph Baric’s pitch to DARPA, per the patents, these can be delivered in an aerosol attack, they can be delivered through water, they can be delivered in food. And so what people were infected with was an Artificial Intelligent parasite.”

Stew then asks her if this is why we saw all of those videos of people sticking magnets to meat in the grocery store.

“Yeah. So, it’s in our food supply. People are sticking magnets to themselves. It’s an AI nanoweapon and again, if you take a look at the peer-reviewed journals in nanotechnology and the peer-reviewed journals in vaccinology and viruses, you’ll see that the technology for the lipid nanoparticles is the same as the spike protein. You’ll also see it’s the same as a military-grade bioweapon or a nanoweapon and James Giordano (https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/hacking-the-brain-with-nanoparticles/) has said, ‘Look, we can use these lipid nanoparticles to infect people and cause disruptions in their emotions and their thoughts and behaviors. We can also induce a pandemic of strokes.’

“So this is what the nanotechnology is. And maybe because it’s so unbelievable, I think people really found validity in patents. Would it be OK if I went to one of the patents right now to explain exactly what this is? OK, so I’m going to go to this patent. It’s one of three patents for the nanoweapon technology and it’s called Intelligent Sensor Platforms and in the abstract, the viewers can see on the cover something similar to a spike protein image.

“So this invention is (https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0178652.html#:~:text=INTELLIGENT%20SENSOR%20PLATFORMS%20United%20States%20Patent%20Application%20201 60178652,are%20further%20capable%20of%20autonomous%20and%2For%20cognitive%20action.) ‘…embodiments that are directed to self-adapting, scalable, and communicating sensor platforms that are further capable of autonomous and/or cognitive action. The invention relates to a multifunction sensor platform, such as a biomedical sensor platform, bio-molecular sensor platform, electronics sensor platform, communications sensor platform, information processing sensor platform, and the like. In another invention embodiment, one or more sensors improve the efficacy of a healthcare.’

“So this can be used as a bioweapon and it can be used in healthcare. Now, as long as there’s no FDA approval of a product under a pre-market application, a medical device does not need to be disclosed to the American People…That’s why the August 23rd approval was so important. We could have changed the rules of warfare.

“But let’s go through this patent to go through what people have bene inoculated with. Essentially, the new AI nanoweapon is a new AI species. Those spike proteins are parasites. And those parasites do gene editing inside of you to spawn viruses, diseases, biosynthetic structures, as well as to host the development of these new species that are being developed.

“So, I’m going to read it from the patent. So, it says here: ‘In one embodiment, the instant invention teaches one or more elements that in whole or in part execute one or more types of actions for creating, spawning, comprising modifying, repairing, regenerating, reassembling, and or control and regulation of one or more cells, cellular elements, cell organelles, including like action and behaviors involving cellular processes such as endocytosis (so things being exuded from cells), exocytosis (being extracted from cells, such as DNA), mitosis, trafficking and signaling (so completely controlling your cytokines, your signals of your immune system, the signals of your central nervous system, your nerve cells), communication between cells, receptor upregulation and downregulation, other behaviors, and the like.’

“So it truly is to completely control the body and now, we know COVID-19, there’s all these CNS symptoms, fatigue, emotional disruption and that’s because this does hijack the central nervous system. So, in one other section here, it says, ‘In one invention embodiment, one or more elements, with or without additional elements, and in some embodiments with minimal functionalization, enter the central nervous system, including passing the blood brain barrier (BBB),’

“Again, I warned the nations about this crossing the blood brain barrier in May of last year – on your show and July of last year – and that these were lipid nanoparticle technologies that were meant to hijack the central nervous system. So here is one of the evil master patents that talks about that.

“An, now, this part’s really important, as well. It says here, that, ‘the invention enables post administration delivery of one or more types of agents into the CNS in 30 minutes or less.’ So, you’ll see sometimes when people get injected, there was that nurse that was injected and you’ll see them automatically go like this [put her head in her hand].

“Well, that’s because this AI nanoweapon is designed to hijack your central nervous system and go straight to you brain within less than 30 minutes. Some of the sequences that are in there are designed to do that.

“So when we were told that the vaccine contained the full mRNA sequence for SARS-CoV-2, we were under the assumption… this synthetically recreated virus that was encapsulated in the lipid nanoparticles. No! It’s actually a computer sequence. It is a computer program sequence.

“So that’s what this is. These are nanotechnology…1/100th as small as a virus. So the masks don’t do anything. Nothing does anything. A biohazard suit doesn’t do anything…they can get through nearly anything.”

Stew comments that these are biosynthetic parasites and that’s why they were responding to ivermectin.

Karen replies, “Thank you for bringing that up, because I want people to have hope. This is not just technology. It’s part technology, part biology. And as you go through the patents and the peer-reviewed publications, most of the biological sequences for this nanoweapon are from parasites…That’s why the ivermectin and the hydroxychloroquine and the anti-parasitical treatments kill it and/or at least slow it down.

“Now, the other thing is it’s part technology…It clearly states on one of the patents that this based on Quantum Dot, it’s based on the Bohr particle, which is based on frequencies – which means that frequencies can also disable the technology and there’s a peer-reviewed publication in Science Magazine that actually talks about how there are specific electromagnetic sequences that completely disable the spike protein (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/External-electric-fields-affect-the-attachment-of-SARS-Cov-2-to-the-host-cell-a-Virus_fig1_350341631).

“Why is that? Because it’s not a biological spike protein. It’s a nanotechnology. That’s why frequencies will disable it…and this is also in SEC filings.

“The 5G towers are part of the energy source for this AI nanoweapon. This AI parasite. Which, again, keep in mind, we’re all being infected with it to – as the patent says – to spawn nee genetic species. That’s what it’s for. So if the 5G towers are taken down – and Starlink was not built for our protection, it’s not a military operation for our protection. It’s a military operation to take down humanity.

“So, the Starlink network and the 5G are needed to basically provide the fundamental energy source for these Artificial Intelligent parasites…genetically-engineered magnetic hydrogels are self-aware. They have cognitive ability and that’s what the are. It’s in the patents, it’s in all of the documentation. They are what is called a smart technology. There’s no real gray area around any of this.”

There is a Part Two to this interview, which I will post soon! You can read more on Karen’s Substack (https://karenkingston.substack.com/).

[I]Contributed by Alexandra Bruce (https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/karen-kingston-has-proof-covid-vaxx-are-biosynthetic-parasites/)

[continued in Part 2]

v1l7isw/?pub=4

Philippe

17th October 2022, 16:04

Here is Part 2.
Part 1 and this seems of the utmost importance. It explains so much about this strange virus and injections. It will need listening more than once to understand all the implications .
For instance:
1:40 What if somebody got sick by infiltration with these bio-synthetic parasites ..?
That is of interest for the many unvaxed in this forum. Obviously the flu and influenza do exist. But what with all these strange symptoms and extreme respiratory attacks that have been labelled Covid? How have people been contaminated or infiltrated by that if there is no Covid virus that spreads thru aerosol contagion ? There is no answer given

Karen Kingston Has Proof COVID & Vaxx Are Biosynthetic Parasites – Part 2

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/karen-kingston-has-proof-covid-vaxx-are-biosynthetic-parasites-part-2/

And “All products for COVID-19; it’s in the patents, it’s on the World Health Organization – so not just the vaxxines but all the tests, all the treatments, all can be inoculated with this parasite. So every COVID-19 product needs to be banned, recalled and if anyone is using it, it should be considered an act of crime, of attempted murder, because that is what it is."
Last week I drove 850 km up north and had a co traveller from French Guadalupe. In july 2021 he needed a PCR test to fly back to France and tested positif. He protested because he was feeling very healthy and none in his family or surroundings were sick. They did a second test in the other nostril and he tested positif again. Therefore he could not fly. BUT 2 hours after the test he came down with high fever and the covid symptoms like body aches. Thanks to the indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants by his mother he recovered in 2 days drinking all thru it the herb there called "herbe de pic" . This is a testimony that the test can be causing the illness.

norman

27th October 2022, 13:26

Experts now urging pause on 5G rollout after study reveals regulators were ignoring health risks of radiation
10/25/2022 - By Belle Carter

https://www.newstarget.com/2022-10-25-experts-urge-halt-5g-rollout-health-hazards.html

https://www.newstarget.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2022/10/Hand-5G-Wireless-Cell-Tower-Phone.jpg

Scientists called for a moratorium on the rollout of 5G (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-cell-tower-health-risks-radiation/) after a study revealed that government regulators were not being fully transparent on the technology’s health hazards.

A study conducted by the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) and subsequently published in public health journal Environmental Health highlighted the risks of exposure to radiation (https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9) from 5G technology. Researchers also said the existing exposure limits for wireless radiation are inadequate, outdated and harmful to human health and wildlife.

In this regard, ICBE-EMF called for an independent assessment of the dangers and impacts (https://www.saferemr.com/2022/10/international-commission-on-biological.html) of wireless radiation and “an immediate moratorium on the further rollout of 5G wireless technologies until safety is demonstrated and not simply assumed.”

Lead study author Dr. Lennart Hardell said in a press release that multiple robust human studies of cell phone radiation have found increased risks for brain tumors. “These are supported by clear evidence of carcinogenicity of the same cell types found in animal studies,” he continued.

Hardell and his co-authors also blasted regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection for ignoring the risks of 5G, even though a multitude of studies indicating the dangers of exposure to wireless radiation are already in print.

The ICBE-EMF is a multi-disciplinary consortium of scientists, doctors and related professionals who are, or have been, involved with research related to the biological and health effects of electromagnetic frequencies (https://emf.news/) up to and including 300 GHz and dedicated to ensuring the protection of humans and other species from the harmful effects of non-ionizing radiation.

Pregnant, children, EMF hypersensitive are the most at risk

The Defender, the official news outlet of the nonprofit Children’s Health Defense, interviewed study authors Hardell and Joel M. Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California, Berkeley‘s School of Public Health. The two authors discussed their findings and their advocacy to raise awareness of the dangers of 5G.

According to Moskowitz, exposure to cell phones and other wireless devices should be limited, especially for pregnant women, children and those electromagnetically hypersensitive. As much as possible, these people should at least minimize their exposure to wireless radiation, they advised.

They also compiled suggestions on how to reduce wireless radiation exposure via an online resource. These include keeping devices such as smartphones and cordless phones at a distance from the body and particularly the head; using these devices in areas where there is a strong signal; reducing secondhand exposure to other individuals’ devices; and switching off household wireless devices at bedtime.

“The 5G technology has many new features never tested for safety, including different carrier frequencies, new modulation and pulsing schemes, beam-forming, phased arrays, and massive MIMO [multiple input, multiple outputs],” Moskowitz said. “The proximity of small cell antennas near where people live and work could pose health problems in addition to wireless radiation exposure from 5G cellphones.”

Meanwhile, Hardell noted that the pulses can be extremely high with 5G technology. “The risks are not studied, especially not long-term,” he said. (Related: Still think 5G is harmless? Scientific American issues warnings about the confirmed and UNKNOWN DANGERS of 5G tech (https://naturalnews.com/2020-10-20-scientific-american-issues-warnings-dangers-of-5g.html).)

Visit 5GAlert.com (https://5galert.com/) to know more about the risks of 5G on human health and the environment.

Watch this video that talks about the scientists’ call for a moratorium on 5G rollout due to exposure hazards (https://www.brighteon.com/e10c88da-be6c-43dc-b6a8-74ff523737af).

Sources include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-cell-tower-health-risks-radiation/)

EHJournal.BiomedCentral.com (https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9)

SaferEMR.com (https://www.saferemr.com/2022/10/international-commission-on-biological.html)

onawah

27th October 2022, 17:32

5G, CV19, AI Bioweapon from Infection to Injection -Karen Kingston
5G is a big component of the injected bioweaponry

CV19 AI Bioweapon from Infection to Injection -Karen Kingston
Greg Hunter's USAWatchdog.com
Published October 25, 2022

"Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with biotech analyst Karen Kingston as she gives us a mind-blowing update on the bioweapon injections for 10.25.22."

This summary from anther Avalonian:
"Rand Paul sponsored new legislation that bypasses animal medical trials, allowing the use of humans in trials, thereby making it official. (Not such a "good guy" after all...)
Qdot, the quantum aspect of the vaccines is the 'final nail in the coffin' of this situation for lack of a better metaphor.
This means information on the quantum/subatomic level is being 'activated' by wireless networks (such as 5G) and manifesting on the atomic level to be used in the non biological/mechanistic portion of the vaccines (ie AI).
There was news coverage re herds of cattle dying enmasse with no explanation as to why, and that was a trial run of this technology.
They vaccinated the cattle, switched on the network activating the AI, and killed the herd."

v1n9vt7/?pub=ijro7

onawah

30th October 2022, 02:38

‘You’re in World War III Today': Casey Fleming on Unrestricted Hybrid Warfare
China in Focus - NTD
701K subscribers
348
3,077 views
10/29/22
⭕ Watch the full episode on EpochTV 👉 https://ept.ms/WW3Today_YT

(No specific mention of 5G in this discussion, but it definitely plays a part.)

"In this special episode, we sat down with Casey Fleming, CEO of business warfare and counterintelligence company BlackOps Partners. He sheds light on a new report by the Institute for Security and Technology called "REWIRED: How Digital Technologies Shape Cognition and Democracy." How is this happening, who's behind it, and what can be done?

Fleming said: "Rewiring is actually rewiring the brain. And it's called psychological warfare—cognitive warfare is the new term—and it all falls underneath hybrid warfare. And that's really to control the minds and the souls of the audience or the population. So it's basically rewiring the brain, and it's accelerated and exacerbated by social media."

"You're in World War III today. It's called hybrid warfare. We're not aware of it, we don't understand it. ... But hybrid warfare, you're in it, you've been in it, and it's peaking, and it's maturing at this point. Eventually, it'll go to conventional warfare at some point, and we may be several years away from that, but understand that our enemy has declared us their enemy. And so therefore, they are our enemy. And we are in a hybrid war, and you need to understand that," he added.

As for what can be done, Fleming said: "We need Americans to realize that they're Americans. And whether they're left, right, or center, that they are Americans and they need to vote for people in office that are going to fix this. That's how we work. That's how we operate. We're a democracy, and the way we change is through voting. We need those people in state, federal, local government that are going to address this thing. It's called foreign influence—under the umbrella of foreign influence. Also, the big data piece of it is not necessarily foreign influence, although the data that they collect is being sold to nation states for foreign influence. Big tech needs to have laws. Big tech says, 'No, we'll regulate ourselves, we can do a better job.' Well, they certainly haven't. And, again, we as Americans cannot, should not, allow that our data be collected and our privacy be violated for other companies to exploit that, and to make money and keep us addicted on their platform. So the way that it would look is voting people into office that are going to fix that and uphold human rights and individual rights on privacy," he added."

RitBoNZIZeM

ExomatrixTV

9th November 2022, 22:23

Is the 5G Radiation From Your Phone Killing You? Using GQ EMF-390 EMF Meter

nKPw-dnxZTo

5G Cell Tower Radiation Level Test with EMFields Acoustimeter AM11 RF Meter:

YcZGVmj7O_4

01. Microwave Sickness Syndrome is KNOWN and Declassified
02. Erratic Pulsed is the opposite of Natural Cosmic Background Radiation
03. WiFi, 4G & 5G CAN Sterilize Chicken Eggs = Biological Effects!
04. ICNIRP has been proven to be Corrupt!
05. Close Proximity to Microwaves = Cumulative Harmful declining Life-expectancy

Most people have no clue what "8x8 (64) Antenna's Phased Array BeamForming Microwaves" are ... let alone what: "Erratic Pulsed Microwaves" are >>> how that differs from natural (super low) Microwave (background) Radiation coming from the Cosmos ... and when they assume it is "non ionizing" like ICNIRP claims they "forget" to mention that Wifi, 4G & 5G WILL react/resonate to (toxic) metallic particles (of all kinds) in (y)our body >> especially aluminum particles ... causing multiple CUMULATIVE harmful health effects ... Just put a wrinkled wrapped tinfoil in your microwave oven and just see what happens when you turn it on .... >> What you see is 100% evidence of ionizing effects that "not suppose to happen" but actually it does happen! ... Multiple Declassified Navy (Government) Documents of the 1970s & 1980s discussing: "Microwave Sickness" >> they even made a list of "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" that is very similar to what we call: "The Flu" ... These FACTS has been discussed in our #Stop5G Fb Group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g) long before the C0VlD Hysteria started! ... between 2017 and 2019 multiple times on record! ...

cheers,
John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
November 9th, 2022 🦜🦋🌳

ExomatrixTV

18th November 2022, 15:52

Neuro-Weapons Exposed (Feat. Robert Duncan)

These are brain control systems that allow A.I. to interface with the bio-electrical system of a human being (remotely) gaining access to the mind and body!
1593105286008827904

Hughe

19th November 2022, 00:41

It's possible Korean government cancels 5G network service of major telecommunication companies due to their lack of 5G infrastructure investment.

Government's punishment of mobile carriers which ignores ‘5G network investment’

The government judged that the number of 5G 28GHz base stations of the three mobile telecommunication companies did not meet the frequency allocation requirements, and canceled frequency allocation and shortened the usage period. It is the first time that the government has canceled the allocation of frequencies owned by a telecommunications company. It is interpreted as a strong warning from the government against the three mobile carriers avoiding 28GHz investment.

The Ministry of Science and ICT announced on the 18th that as a result of checking the implementation rate of base station installation in the 28 GHz band, it notified SK Telecom (SKT) of a 10% (6 months) reduction in the usage period and KT and LG U+ (LGU+) of the disposition of allocation cancellation. .

The Ministry of Science and ICT allocated 3.5 GHz and 28 GHz bands for 5G frequencies to three mobile telecommunication companies in 2018, and ordered them to build 22,500 and 15,000 base stations, respectively, by the third year. In addition, the condition that the allocation can be canceled if the number of base stations is less than 10% of the mandatory number of base stations or the evaluation result score is less than 30 points. In the recent implementation result inspection conducted by the Ministry of Science and ICT, all three telecommunication companies received a passing score of 90 or higher for the 3.5GHz band. However, in the 28GHz band, SKT received only 30.5 points, LGU+ 28.9 points, and KT only 27.3 points.

If the final cancellation decision is made in the hearing process next month, KT and LGU+ must turn off the 28GHz band frequency. The government plans to cancel the allocation if SKT fails to meet the allocation conditions by the end of May next year. The government is also leaving open the possibility of foreign operators entering the market as new operators.

Regarding the government's decision, LGU+ expressed regret, saying, "We have participated in national projects related to the 28GHz service and have carried out many construction activities such as developing business models." KT lowered its stance, saying, "Due to realistic limitations such as the characteristics of 28 GHz radio waves, the level of infrastructure development does not meet the government's expectations."

Source: https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/022/0003755887?sid=105

norman

2nd December 2022, 14:59

Clueless New Yorkers want THOUSANDS of 5G towers in the city to be gone for being “unsightly,” oblivious to their real purpose
Sunday, November 27, 2022 by: Arsenio Toledo

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-27-new-yorkers-want-unsightly-5g-towers-gone.html

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/91/2022/11/3D-5G-Wireless-Internet.jpg

In New York City, particularly in the borough of Brooklyn, city residents are suddenly seeing thousands of giant 5G towers being erected (https://greatgameindia.com/new-york-giant-5g-towers/) all over their neighborhoods. These residents want the towers gone because of their appearance and how they might affect property values.

The gray, 32-feet-tall 5G towers began appearing all over the city almost overnight as part of LinkNYC (https://www.brooklynpaper.com/monstrosities-brooklynites-question-the-look-locations-of-5g-towers/), an ongoing project started by former Mayor Bill de Blasio to replace the city’s payphones with free WiFi kiosks. The latest step of this project involves replacing some of those kiosks with next-generation 5G towers known as “NYC Link5G.”

The city plans to construct at least 2,500 of these (https://www.fox5ny.com/news/5g-towers-spark-outrage-across-nyc) towers all over the city, mostly in areas where cell service is considered relatively weaker, with the goal of eventually eliminating these so-called “internet deserts.” (https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/5g-towers-suddenly-showed-up-across-nyc-heres-why-some-neighborhoods-want-them-gone/3944233/) (Related: Alex Jones: People living close to 5G kill grids are going to DIE from cancer (https://naturalnews.com/2022-11-17-people-close-5g-kill-grids-die-cancer.html).)

The towers were installed as part of LinkNYC, a project by former Mayor Bill de Blasio to replace the city’s payphones with free WiFi kiosks. The 5G towers are touted as being the next-generation model of the kiosks (https://www.brooklynpaper.com/monstrosities-brooklynites-question-the-look-locations-of-5g-towers/), known as “NYC Link5G.”

The 5G towers that have come online are offering city residents free public WiFi, much like the former Link NYC WiFi kiosks. The poles also come with keypads, speakers and audio jacks for people to make calls with, along with USB ports to charge devices and a 911 call button for emergencies.

Most New Yorkers that have spoken with mainstream media outlets seem to be unaware of the health dangers associated with living close to 5G towers, and have instead lambasted the city because the towers are “imposing eyesores.” (https://www.fox5ny.com/news/5g-towers-spark-outrage-across-nyc)

“It’s extremely huge,” said Marion Little, the owner of a hardware store in Brooklyn, who is also concerned about how the towers will affect nearby residential property values. “A lot of people call me, email me, text me like ‘What is that? What’s going on?’ And I have no answer.”

“When I saw how huge it was, and this monstrosity of an installation, I said, ‘What is that?’ No one came to us to ask if we wanted it, if we were concerned,” said Hon. Renee Collymore of the Vanderbilt Block Association over in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Fort Greene.

Some New Yorkers actually worried about their safety

In Manhattan’s Upper East Side, Gus Rosendale of NBC New York was able to interview some New Yorkers who were actually worried about their safety and their health.

In one apartment building on East 90th Street, neighbors organized a petition to get the tower moved far away from them.

“We have a five-month-old baby who sleeps right here, 10 feet away from it,” said Joe Formica, who is very concerned about the health risks a close tower could have on his child. “We haven’t been given information. Just went up. We are right there, definitely a concern.”

“They were supposed to change a light bulb and they changed this,” said Virginie Glaenzer of the Yorkville neighborhood. “Once this enormous, threatening box was installed, the world was flipped upside down.”

Learn more about the dangers related to living close to 5G towers at 5GAlert.com (https://5galert.com/).

Watch this clip from InfoWars discussing how 5G grids are spreading across the globe at a very alarming rate (https://www.brighteon.com/86e7b351-19fe-49a6-9db9-fa2edea56e99).

More related stories:

New Yorkers freaking out over sudden appearance of ominous, three-story-tall 5G towers all across the city (https://naturalnews.com/2022-11-08-new-yorkers-concerned-sudden-appearance-5g-towers.html).

Health hazard: 5G exposure may cause cancer, infertility and developmental defects. (https://radiationscience.com/2022-10-13-5g-exposure-causes-cancer-infertility-developmental-defects.html)

Scientists call for moratorium on 5G after study shows regulators ignoring health risks of radiation. (https://5galert.com/2022-10-20-scientists-call-for-moratorium-on-5g.html)

5G rollout must be stopped to avoid widespread exposure to EMF and RF radiation. (https://radiation.news/2022-08-18-stop-5g-rollout-avoid-exposure-emf-radiation.html)

NOT JUST HUMANS: Scientists say 5G radiation is killing animals and wildlife. (https://5galert.com/2022-02-06-scientists-say-5g-radiation-killing-animals-wildlife.html)

onawah

8th December 2022, 00:12

Proof of how 5G and the VAXX work together to maim and kill

Heart Attacks in Unborn Babies- Episode 9 BRAVE: Live Courageously, Heal Miraculously
From: Jonathan Otto <jonathan@healthsecret.com>
12/7/22

I've edited the following message to eliminate the ads for the docuseries and all the rest they are offering in a limited time package deal, which is very comprehensive. It's here: https://braveseries.com/own/
It looks like a great deal and if I had the money, I would buy it and donate the videos, etc. to the local library.
Perhaps some Avalonians will want to buy it & do something similar.
Following is the vital info briefly outlining what info they are covering in the series.

"The last episode of our incredible 9-episode BRAVE: Live Courageously, Heal Miraculously | RELOADED docuseries aired last night…
Viewers learned how to protect themselves from the wiles of the Elites… because they’re still intent on depopulating the planet by spreading disease.
They’ve spread their dangerous toxins almost everywhere.
And since the rate of serious disease is skyrocketing worldwide, their plan must be working.
But experts have uncovered how to protect yourself and your loved ones from the GlobalistBefore we continue with the shocking revelations in this episode…
Do you know that even unborn babies are now dying of heart attacks in their mother’s wombs?
This is outrageous, but true.
And it’s part of what world famous investigative journalist Stew Peters shared to viewers earlier today:

“These injected mothers, their babies are having heart attacks in the womb, unborn babies. I don't know what else to say to you.”
Stew Peters is the famous producer of the “Died Suddenly” documentary that went viral.
You really want to hear all the shocking revelations he shared with viewers in this episode…
Especially how to protect yourself and your family from the Oligarchs who desperately want to remake the world in their own image.

Christopher Key also revealed the “sixth extinction” plan of the Globalists and how childhood vaccines are at the heart of this 60+ year depopulation plan.
“We're in the midst of the sixth extinction right now. Right now, one in every three of our males are infertile. One in every four of our females.
“Do you understand that in 1965, 4% of the United States population had a chronic disease? And then, in 2010, HHS did a study and showed that 54% of our children now have a chronic disease.”
This percentage will be close to 80% today.
But, is it all coincidence?
Experts don’t think so, and there’s enough evidence that this was premeditated.
Next… Dr. Lee Merritt shared the latest news about EMF and how it subtly triggers some of the worst autoimmune conditions we know today.
“They called it telegrapher's disease… in Fort Riley, Kansas. The Russians called this fotony smert or death photons. You have to be in the electromagnetic frequency band of the world.
The implication here is that you can use wavelength to help to heal or to damage, and it can create diseases. They've been lying to us about viruses. It can be done with EMF and it isn't just about 5G. They've been doing this for a long time.”
To prove that this was true, Dr. Merritt invested in an EMF monitor and the result of her home test is eye-opening.
“Here's a perfect example. I have a cell phone monitor or electromagnetic frequency monitor. So I did it with my cell phone and I put the monitor on my chest and then I turned on my cell phone like I was reading. And high, high levels right on my breast area.”
>> Listen to Dr. Merritt’s recent findings about the dangers of EMF, 5G and cell towers and discover the best EMF mitigation strategies
You’ll also hear from frontline health practitioners like Dr. Paul Thomas… Dr. Jane Ruby… Nurse Erin Marie Olszewski… and Nurse Priscilla Romans…
Who share “inside information” that everyone must know about the elites, medical bullying, and how to make sure your loved ones are not denied critical care when they need it.

“We are seeing young people, young, healthy athletes, boom, dropping dead here and there and everywhere, comedians dropping dead, people going into seizures.
In pregnancy, it's a disaster. It's causing stillbirth, miscarriages, and a whole host of bleeding, menstrual abnormalities. It basically goes to almost any place in the body.” – Dr. Paul Thomas

In BRAVE AWARENESS: Exposing the Global Governments’ Coercive Agendas…

Experts will open your eyes to the subtle mind-control “tricks” the Globalists use to coerce the vast majority of humanity to do their bidding…

And in BRAVE NEW WORLD: How the Global Elites are Transforming Humanity...

Top medical experts Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Bryan Ardis, and Ann Vandersteel uncover the undercover plan to wipe out human DNA over several generations… and why experts find high-tech EMF ‘devices’ in the vaccines under powerful magnification.

To your health,
Jonathan Otto "

https://braveseries.com/own/

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114253-Vaccine-Crimes&p=1531713&viewfull=1#post1531713

onawah

11th December 2022, 01:32

Braveseries.com is showing the series free again online today
Email update today from: Jonathan Otto <jonathan@healthsecret.com>
12/10/22

"I just wanted to remind you that Replay Weekend is still on!

Which means that you have free access to watch all 10 Episodes and 20 Bonus Episodes of our just concluded BRAVE: Live Courageously, Heal Miraculously | RELOADED docuseries.

So if you missed some episodes… or want to listen to your favorite experts and episodes again…

Now’s the time to do it.

So here’s the link to your Replay Weekend episodes:

>>> Watch Episodes 1-10 and Bonus Episodes 1-10 of BRAVE: Live Courageously, Heal Miraculously | RELOADED :
https://braveseries.com/replays/

onawah

12th December 2022, 03:55

5G and the jabs, working together

That makes sense. People in China were dropping dead in Wuhan right after they got the jabs and when 5G was implemented.
That would be what the nano tech in the jabs is all about.

Additional Info:

Let's see how long this will last on Youtube .. haha...

This is what 'phasing' looks like...

zqvVR8DG6po

Is this what peeps are saying will be activated by 5gee

Hermoor

19th December 2022, 17:02

This story just came to my attention about the dangers of 4g.

It revolves around a French dairy farmer, Frederic Salgues. In July 2021 a 4g antenna was switched on 200 metres from his farm. After a few days he already noticed a 15-20% drop in his cows' milk production. 40 of his 200 cows then proceeded to die off!

In court the mayor who authorised the antenna actually testifed in favour of Salgues. The mayor said he had growing concerns for the health of his 1500 villagers and feared for a human catastrophe on a wider level.

The court ordered the antenna to be switched off for two months for further monitoring and assessment. Yet lawyers for the telephone companies protested that there was no scientific evidence of a link between animal health problems and electromagnetic fields surrounding mobile phone antennas! Quelle surprise....

https://www.thescottishfarmer.co.uk/news/20193762.mast-kidding---french-court-orders-4g-turn-off-40-cow-deaths/

Slightly different reporting and an update here.

https://www.connexionfrance.com/article/Practical/Environment/French-farmer-on-a-mission-to-prove-4G-tower-is-harming-his-cattle

The most recent update I could find is here. Fancy legal strokes are being pulled to prolong and complicate the matter. The big club appears to be trying to starve out Monsieur Salgues and sweep the whole thing under the carpet. What a world we live in.

https://www.zoomdici.fr/actualite/antenne-4g-la-ferme-du-mazeyrat-toujours-dans-limpasse#comments

ExomatrixTV

2nd January 2023, 23:21

Strange Things Happen When You Do Not Have A Smartphone:

xDsf3sztavI
It's been almost two months since I got rid of my smartphone. I have made some observations I did not expect. Also smartphone addiction is far worse and much more widespread than I realized.

bull-hansen.com (https://bull-hansen.com)

ExomatrixTV

14th January 2023, 15:42

Is EHS-EMF Sensitivity Real? (https://www.elexana.com/journal-emf-emi-information/2021/7/18/is-ehs-emf-sensitivity-real)

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5a0e23c44c326d9936152f3b/1626097401070-4C32Q6DVTXUQBGIYOW1V/EHS-EMF+Sensitivity-Is-it-real.jpeg

EHS/EMF Sensitivity: Is it Real?

Medical Disclaimer: The following article is for educational purposes only. It is in no way meant to diagnose, be a diagnostic tool, or offer any form of medical treatment. Therefore, if you have any of the symptoms mentioned, we advise you to see your licensed medical practitioner or physician. In addition, some of the statements herein are the author’s opinions, not necessarily shared by anyone else associated with Elexana.
In Sweden, electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is an officially fully recognized functional impairment (i.e., it is not regarded as a disease). Survey studies show that somewhere between 230,000-290,000 Swedish men and women report a variety of symptoms when being in contact with electromagnetic field (EMF) sources. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17178584/
EMF Sensitivity™ @2012,©2016, ©2018, ©2021. All rights are reserved.
(A.K.A. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, EMF Sensitive, Electromagnetic Field Sensitive, EHS, Electrohypersensitivity, Electrosensitivity, Radio Frequency Intolerance, EMF Allergic)

There is a growing number of New Yorkers and others around the world calling us because they have developed an acute sensitivity to human-engineered electromagnetism. Is EHS-EMF Sensitivity Real?

Are some people gaming the system, in Europe; collecting disability because they claim to have EHS to get out of working for a living? Possibly.
Are some people who have various psychological adaptive disorders claiming they have EHS and in reality do not? Yes, and I have met a few.
Are some people claiming to have EHS sensitive to electromagnetic fields at far below any government’s safety guidelines? Yes. I do not doubt that individuals have developed an acute sensitivity to EMF, and the number of those suffering from this sensitivity, each to a seemingly different degree, appears to be increasing steadily over time. However, due to the nature of this affliction, I would be surprised if more than 10-15% of the population eventually suffers from EHS. Still, I also have absolutely no doubt that many more people suffer from the consequences of electromagnetic interference caused by human-engineered electromagnetism than the medical profession, except for a select few talented physicians realize.

Back in the 1980s, none of us imagined that telecoms and all of the related secondary and tertiary industries would become as significant drivers of the American economy as they have become today. In a modern economy, the sectors that are the leading profiteers are those buying the most television commercial time. Today, in America, there seems to be not one TV commercial break on any channel that does not have a Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Google, Apple, Sprint, or Samsung TV commercial.
What would it mean to those profiting from technologies involving human-engineered electricity if EHS were an actual physical health issue and not a mental health issue, as considered today? What would it mean if the numbers of those with EHS became the majority?

The CBS Sunday Morning Show brought up the insomnia epidemic in this country. Why is no one on TV considering the possibility of cellphone towers, wifi, smart meters, and other wireless devices in our homes, catalysts for this insomnia epidemic? One in every five new married couples is infertile, and the number is growing by the decade. Why is no one on TV making the possible link to wireless technology? Every radio frequency that exceeds 114 MHz travels out through the ionosphere into outer space. If solar flares cause blackouts, how will 60,000 Starlink satellites sending and receiving extremely fast pulsed electrical signals through the ionosphere affect our planet? All frequencies above 114 MHz, do not reflect or bounce off of the ionosphere but travel through it. How are these transmissions affecting both the ionosphere and our planet? Has anyone on TV brought this up? We know that the same money funding modern technology also buys our politicians' campaign funding, provides scientists with the best paying jobs, and donates billions to our universities. Many museums and historical societies rely on the rent income received from hosting antenna ports.

If you are reading this page, you may have EHS or think that you might have it. You may be aware of the "scientific" studies that "prove" that EHS seems to be nothing more than an imagined phenomenon, therefore a psychological issue and not a physical one. This opinion is the current viewpoint of the American Medical Association. Unfortunately, the A.M.A.'s well-documented historical batting average does not provide confidence in their first opinions. Its original medical ideas regarding cigarette smoke, asbestos, processed sugar, and the countless drugs and medical devices they have endorsed that were eventually removed from the shelves all diminish its scientific credibility. Are all those suffering from EHS delusional, or insane? Or, is EHS a real physical phenomenon, independent of belief systems and neurosis, rooted in physiology and physics?

Is there an unidentified group of people suffering from EHS who have not yet connected their discomfort to non-ionizing radiation or live in denial because it is just too difficult to accept as a possibility? After all, human-engineered electromagnetism is inescapable if you choose to live in society.

If you are reading this post, you may be wondering about yourself or your spouse? Have you been recently experiencing unexplainable pressure inside your head, tingling or heat sensations on your skin, inexplicable rashes, sudden heart palpitations, insomnia, occasional vertigo, dizziness, or constant fatigue? Does your eardrum area hurt when you put a cellphone to your ear? Do you ever feel a deep pressure at the top of your spine?

Do you suffer from a thyroid condition, premature cataracts, unexplainable headaches, ADHD, ADD, short-term memory lapses (and, you are not old), irrational mood swings, premature aging, or a symptom your doctors can't explain?

Many of these experiences or symptoms have been shown, with peer-reviewed studies at BioInitiative.org (http://www.BioInitiative.org), to be caused by entering into strong electromagnetic fields or from persistent and prolonged exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Therefore, if you can consciously feel electromagnetic radiation or experience discomfort, you may have EHS (Electro-Hypersensitivity), EMF (Electromagnetic Field Radiation) Sensitivity, EM Sensitivity, EM Awareness, etc. Call it what you will. If you have it, you live with it, and it doesn't matter what anyone calls it.

Human-engineered electromagnetism is not natural electromagnetism. Human-engineered electricity is either made from:

Alkaline and lithium-ion batteries or some other battery using a chemical reaction to generate and store DC electricity.
AC (Alternating Current) uses rotating magnets and transformers to convert natural energy into electricity with a sinusoidal waveform at 50-60 cycles per second.
DC (Direct Current) electricity produced using rectifiers consisting of looped circuit alternating diodes switching on and off, and often adding resistors, a transformer/inductors, and capacitors to smoothen out the AC sine wave to form a pulsed DC at 120 Hertz.
EMF emissions are from electrical equipment such as wifi routers, cellphones, cellphone tower transmissions, power lines, transformers, unshielded home wiring, electrical wiring errors, power tools, wireless surveillance systems, baby monitors, Bluetooth devices, and so much more.

The number of persons with EMF Sensitivity is estimated to comprise 3-5% of the population. The numbers could be much higher due to both the growing awareness of EMF health effects and the regular addition of new wireless technologies. I would like to add the perversely high percentage of homes that are poorly grounded, and the high number of homes with electrical wiring errors made by unlicensed and poorly trained electricians.

Often, those who claim to be sensitive begin feeling this energy in their early to mid-forties. (Although lately, we're encountering an increasing number of callers in their thirties and even twenties. In addition, many children with Downe syndrome or those on the spectrum present EMF sensitivity.

Most with EHS can relate to a time in their lives when they spent long periods exposed to specific electromagnetic fields. Examples are: sitting hours at their desk with the wifi next to them, sleeping near their electrical panel, welding for a living, using power tools for a living, driving a patrol car for many years, living under a power line, etc.
The realization that one is sensitive can be perplexing, daunting, or even terrifying. EHS can suddenly seem to happen in one day. Bam! You suddenly feel everything that produces electromagnetism. And then, the awareness that RF transmitters are everywhere! In the subways, everyone has a cellphone; smart meters are in your building, Bluetooth devices are in your home, it's endless!

Typical EHS symptoms include feeling an uncomfortable pressure in the cerebral cortex/occipital lobe areas, deep pain or pressure in the neck area or upper spine, chronic insomnia, brain fog, concentration issues, short-term memory lapses, or going suddenly blank in the middle of doing something, occasional vertigo, loud ringing in the ears, low-frequency rumbling sounds, unexplainable rashes or a burning or heating sensation in the skin, tingling sensations in the legs and arms, sharp headaches, sudden pain in an eye, intermittent irritability for no apparent reason, mood swings, irrational relationship-sabotage or self-sabotage, teeth grinding or clenching during sleep, and more. Every month, I hear of a new symptom.

* Again, if you experience any of these symptoms, I am obligated by law to recommend that you see your doctor.

Before continuing, I have to make one significant point: Everyone is adversely affected by EMF, to one degree or another. Anyone who does not realize this or believes that their exposure to electromagnetic radiation is not a potential concern is simply ignorant of the peer-reviewed science. In addition, some professionals, including doctors, understand the health effects of electromagnetic radiation and why it can cause health problems. However, most realize that this understanding requires a cross-discipline knowledge of physics and biology, termed Quantum Biology or Molecular Biophysics, that most doctors do not learn in medical school.

After all, what is a chemical reaction? In essence, it is bonds created or broken by the sharing or releasing of electrons. In other words, a chemical reaction is an electromagnetic reaction.

From the vantage of all certified EMRS, an increasing number of people are suffering from uncomfortable physical symptoms and illnesses due to electromagnetic radiation. We have each tested many homes of those claiming to have EMF Sensitivity. These clients felt the most discomfort where the EMF levels were at their highest in their homes. Most clients with EHS have been very consistent with identifying the areas in their homes with the strongest fields. For those who have proven to be truly sensitive, I encourage them to trust what they are feeling. We all need to do this; trust what we feel.

As already indicated, I'm aware of most of the studies claiming the "data" prove that EMF Sensitivity appears to be “psychosomatic and idiopathic.” Yes, anything is possible when it comes to the tricks the mind can play. But, what explains those times when someone gets a sharp pain without foreknowing that a cell transmitter is nearby? What defines the consistency between the areas in their homes where they feel the worse and the measured levels corroborate what they are feeling?

Fortunately, I am well-versed in the scientific method and have reviewed every single one of these "studies" I could find which claimed to debunk EHS. What did I uncover?
I have found that each of these studies had a least one significant error or flaw involving either the set-up, measuring protocols, assumptions, collection of the data, or analysis of the data. To add, any person who has studied statistics also knows that a clever person can create a "study" to prove or disprove just about anything! Replicability is essential for verifying scientific conclusiveness. Without a third party replicating any of these debunking studies, their conclusions should not be taken seriously by anyone.
All pain can be said to “be in the head.” Our brains receive signals from traumatized cells, irritated nerves and then register these sensations as pain.
Let's look at two studies.
When someone says that they felt pressure from applied electrostimulation and then 20 seconds later did not, it does not prove that this person was making their sensitivity up, after having been exposed a first time. And, for a scientist to draw this conclusion only provides us with information that they 1. do not understand the nature of EHS at all, and, 2. do not have the necessary talent, training, motivation, or discipline to conduct an open-minded experiment.

If nerves within the surrounding fine tissue, containing trace amounts of metals such as; copper, iron, silver, and others, are irritated, then that fine tissue becomes inflamed or swollen, to some degree, in reaction to the irritation. As a result, these nerves may not differentiate a second exposure occurring within a short time interval from the first exposure. In addition, the slow healing time of swollen tissue will ipso facto cause the subject to lose the ability to differentiate consequential exposures.
Another “debunking study” shows that an EHS subject was "proven" to be duped by a placebo exposure to electromagnetism while sitting near the testing machine that was electrically floating; emitting a strong proximal electric field. The subject's feet were also close to the wall that may have had unshielded wiring, and overhead was an old-style magnetic ballast fluorescent light undoubtedly emitting a magnetic field; causing harmonic transients coupled onto the electric fields of the testing device itself. Who knows what the ambient EMR was in the room? Here was a "conclusive scientific experiment" that only proved the scientists' shortcomings.

What about studies from "third-party independent labs." So many of us can be gullible when it comes to the tricks of "science," either innocent or manipulative, that both science and the medical industry can play. We need to ask, "Who funded the study? Was is a shell company funding this study? Did the funder or the scientist, have a bias or personal agenda? How was the data compiled and interpreted?" And, then there's the whole concept of using relative versus absolute result ratios, which can skew any experiment's interpretation.

Too many studies and their conclusions are unreliable, dishonest. This is why I do not “trust the science.” This is why I have to test for myself. (5G is a good example. The present reality of 5G is not even close to what the TV commercials tell us that it is. Most likely the sales and marketing managers do not even understand the details of the technology of 5G.)

If you walk into a room and you feel a strong EMF, then measure it or have an Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist (EMRS) measure it for you. Everyone should own an AC gaussmeter and an RF meter. Amateur meters will tell you if the levels are going up or down. That is all you need to know, in many instances. A certified EMRS can help you with solutions.

From what we EMRS have collectively observed, there appear to be consistencies between chemical toxicity sensitivity, Lyme disease, and EMF toxicity sensitivity. According to Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D., one significant result of exposure to EMF is interference to calcium ion (Ca2+) motility and signaling in the body. This interference has a direct effect on neurology and autoimmune function. Thus, it appears that chemical and EMF sensitivity are natural results of becoming over-exposed to particular environmental stressors or toxins.

The human body is capable of sensing the lowest levels of electromagnetism. Dr. Robert O. Becker (The Body Electric) writes that the human body is sensitive to a direct electrical stimulation down to nearly 100 nano-amperes. A nano-amp is a billionth of an amp or 0.000000001 amps. Today, Mount Sinai Hospital uses electrical stimulation, just a few hundred nano-amps of DC, to accelerate bone cell regeneration. Like many things, a little can be good, and a lot, not so good.

Our skin-voltage monitor shows our clients that the skin will react to electromagnetic fields with a strength as low as a thousandth of a volt, a millivolt. During an epidermal voltage measurement, one never consciously feels anything on their skin, yet the skin responds immediately to the slightest change in the electric field. Thus, the epidermis is highly sensitive to electromagnetism, whether we consciously feel it or not.
To further show how sensitive we are to the smallest amounts of microsimulation from electromagnetism, Guy Doron and Michael Brecht published a work in 2015 titled:

"What Single-Cell Stimulation Has Told Us About Neural Coding." (http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1677/20140204)

In this report, they state, "The later development of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), a technique in which trains of short (100–200 ms) constant electrical pulses of small current intensities (1–100mA) are delivered extracellularly via a microelectrode at rates of tens to hundreds of Hertz, enabled a more reliable activation of localized populations of neurons and directly influenced sensory perception, movement, and cognition."

Of course, none of us can consciously sense levels as low as a few hundred nano-amps. Still, there is mounting scientific evidence that conscious sensitivity to higher levels is a natural result of one having higher levels of trace metals or even naturally occurring biogenic magnetite in their tissues. The latter was a result of a study by Caltech's Joseph Kirschvink in 1992.

oaringlionpublishing.com/tony_uploads/Magnetite_Biomineralization_in_the_Human_Brain.pdf (http://www.roaringlionpublishing.com/tony_uploads/Magnetite_Biomineralization_in_the_Human_Brain.pdf)

Here, Kirschvink reveals that we all have ferromagnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) in our brain tissue and throughout our bodies. Iron is not only conductive, but iron is also is susceptible to magnetic fields.

In 1975, Allen Frey demonstrated that continuous exposure to microwaves at power densities as low as 30 µW/cm2 (30,000 µW/m2) could weaken fine membranes such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A permeable BBB will allow larger-sized trace-heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium, aluminum, lead, antimony, and others, to penetrate the BBB.

Eberhard et al. (2008) report that two-hour exposures to cell phone GSM microwave RF resulted in albumin leakage across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and neuron damage. Neuronal albumin uptake was significantly correlated with the occurrence of damaged neurons when measured at 28 days post-exposure. The lowest exposure level was 0.12 mW/kg (0.00012 W/kg) for two hours. The highest exposure level was 120 mW/kg (0.12 W/kg). The weakest exposure level showed the most significant effect in opening the BBB and neuron damage and death.

elexana.com/news/2017/12/22/cell-phone-study-drastically-lowers-safety-thresholds (https://www.elexana.com/news/2017/12/22/cell-phone-study-drastically-lowers-safety-thresholds)

Are our brains also electromagnetic sensors? In 2016, the same Joseph Kirschvink proved that we use biogenic magnetite to sense polarity changes in the Earth's magnetic fields. This sense helps our brain's awareness of daytime short waves shifting to nighttime's much longer waves, signaling the pineal gland to release melatonin.
Yes. Science is speaking. We are all sensitive to electromagnetic fields. This phenomenon is why it is so critical that we mitigate the strong fields created within our homes and workplaces.

Sometimes, those with EHS feel like they are "trapped in this modern technological world."

There is hope. Removing trace metals from the blood takes time, but clients have done it. Unfortunately, discharging trace metals from the brain area is more challenging once they pass through the BBB. Yet, I believe it is possible to release these toxins. For that matter, so does the University of Kentucky's Dr. Boyd Haley, who has a chelating agent in the final stage of testing for FDA approval.

Another theory for the cause of EHS symptoms is that some are deuterium toxic and can't release this heavy form of hydrogen. It is found everywhere in the universe. D2O is the heavy water we use to cool nuclear reactors. High-fat diets seem to help the body release deuterium. There is much we don't know about this area of research.
Some medical practitioners such as Dr. Jerry Tennant believe that emotional trauma causes DC magnetic fields to become stored in the limbic system. Some medical practitioners believe that healing therapies can help reduce limbic system magnetic fields to reduce sensitivity to EMF.

In conclusion, some folks have not only found relief from the intensity of EHS and have been able to rise above the existential angst of feeling trapped without an escape from our modern world's ubiquitous human-engineered electromagnetic radiation. So, please, do not despair. Reach out to your local EMRS for a home consultation. If you do not have a local EMRS, then please call Elexana for virtual testing via the zoom platform. Take control of your immediate environment as best you can.

source (https://www.elexana.com/journal-emf-emi-information/2021/7/18/is-ehs-emf-sensitivity-real?fbclid=IwAR2EbfPJkxo9FsKo6GcsekIFzG9ORBRQIORpcfMkFwNyNjLXD3K3fsZ5KOQ)

ExomatrixTV

30th January 2023, 18:14

U.S. Government Admits ‘5G Radiation Causes COVID-19’ – Stunning Admission!

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/i/u/-/6/iu-6h.gaa.mp4

Bombshell new peer-reviewed scientific studies have revealed what many of us knew from the beginning. 5G radiation is not only connected to the Covid-19 pandemic, it actually induces the body to create new viruses and illnesses, including coronaviruses.

And before the mainstream media gets hold of this study and convinces the masses that it is unimportant, you should know that these are peer-reviewed scientific studies published on the National Institute of Health website.

source (https://rumble.com/v274idk-u.s.-government-admits-5g-radiation-causes-covid-19-stunning-admission.html?s=04&fbclid=IwAR25nJa0ka9_7fYNkkBMeDx-bjQpa5R1jf-ukAf8L52XdJ26cxiss4H8rlU)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522)

Nick Matkin

31st January 2023, 18:01

onawah

31st January 2023, 20:26

Any claims that COVID is caused by EMFs is going to come under a lot of scrutiny, but it's already been proven beyond a doubt that EMFs make living things more vulnerable. If the NIH is coming out with that info, it's a very good sign.
The following comment from the medicalxpress link is worth noting:

Wood73
5 days ago
I am a retired director of engineering and planning from the telecom industry. I retired 18 years ago when we had 3g and 4g was coming. In 30 years with telecom, I never saw a new radio wave technology deployed without having fcc radiation testing.
About 2 years ago, I saw a group of doctors and professors go before a US senate subcommittee to try to force testing (they got nowhere.) Then the subcommittee brought in VPs from the Telcos and manufacturing. They were asked if any studies to identify the impact on humans were done. The answers from every one of them were "not to my knowledge". I thought this was bizarre. Then I heard in the US that town councils were not allowed to stop it from being deployed. Then I saw a strange speech by the head of the US FCC, in which, he said something like if people claim that they know what this does "run the other way" He then broadly said get out of the way because you won't stop it.. This reminds me of TRUMPS rolling out untested vaccines in "operation warp speed"

All too conveniently fast, with no liability.
Odd that Corona virus spread just as swiftly in nations without a decent mobile phone system, let alone a 5G network. Seems the above report is well and truly discredited here: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-linking-5g-covid-swiftly-debunked.html

ExomatrixTV

1st February 2023, 21:39

Nick Matkin

3rd February 2023, 11:42

ExomatrixTV

3rd February 2023, 11:44

Odd that Corona virus spread just as swiftly in nations without a decent mobile phone system, let alone a 5G network. Seems the above report is well and truly discredited here: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-linking-5g-covid-swiftly-debunked.html

Here is the government website, factcheckers! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522

That's the report that has been discredited and retracted by the publishers.

See here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/

Not the same, and even if it was ... being healthy skeptical of the word: "retracted" ... there is a big chance that certain powers can push for it to be taken down (covered up) for obvious reasons ... that is not "impossible" in a world of so much corruption!

Spin doctors always use fancy lawyer terms to frame things a bit different and use all kinds of gaslighting techniques to harass anyone exposing crimes against humanity!

This has been done on so many topics like: Tobacco "Science", Agent Orange, Asbestos, GMO food, Round Up Pesticides etc. etc.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

onawah

7th February 2023, 22:32

The plague that is ruining the lives of millions - not to mention what it's doing to the planet
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense <lloyd@electricsenseinterviews101.com> via gmail.mcsv.net
2/7/23

"Can you believe that only 5% of mystery symptoms are caused by genetic mutation? Health experts attribute the other 95% percent to the toxic overload that overwhelms your body’s ability to cope with external threats.
Toxins have become a plague that are now ruining the lives of millions of people, not to mention the damage being done to the planet.

Then there is the EMF curveball. Repeated chemical and environmental toxin exposures over days, weeks, months…. years combined with wireless and other forms of man-made electromagnetic field exposure…. This is how EMFs surreptitiously disrupt your body’s natural functioning, opening the floodgates to dis-ease.

https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/9ecQMYFo73wKEZri1NuT1sD6hb0t-yuNHhluOwI6bYPReTLlpuNEbIMOGm6-RQMzTICqER5tns2X4-nA6_x-4oW2XvxyyrqoAjyi9ECh8ZvAmrlezEno1MfYDx6CxW65wvn51rPvN_SWEnc685i4RbabuxoMNQ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mcusercontent.com/20530cbb0ca083edf4657e766/images/5097232e-2fcf-dcee-3721-eca26fcae418.png

These same toxins are responsible for invisible “conditions” like autoimmune diseases and many other mystery illnesses like inexplicable joint pain, recurring fever, heartbreaking infertility and so much more!

That is why I am excited to share with you how you can take steps to protect yourself from this invisible damage - top experts in environmental medicine have joined together (like Dr. Kelly McCann, Brian Vaszily, and Ocean Robbins) to help you secure a healthier future!

Yes, it’s true that we have a naturally built-in detox system, but honestly it’s overworked and overloaded - making it difficult to manage the huge amount of toxins we are bombarded with every day.

So let’s explore the toxin side of autoimmune diseases, allergies, cancer, weight issues and other mystery illnesses - find out what the experts have to say.

To your highest health,

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. This is something everyone will greatly benefit from - don’t miss out. Here is the link
https://zonia.com/toxin-free?a=electricsense&b=0d539318
...and don’t forget to share this with your loved ones.

ExomatrixTV

13th February 2023, 01:27

Case Report: The Microwave Syndrome after Installation of 5G Emphasizes the Need for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation (https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/case-report-the-microwave-syndrome-after-installation-of-5g-emphasizes-the-need-for-protection-from-radiofrequency-radiation)

Blastolabs

14th February 2023, 23:55

Declassified document from dia.gov FOIA Library :sherlock:
They openly voice frustrations that a "schizophrenic person" was able to aquire the information via FOIA. :facepalm:

Very strange document. The document is suppose to be about EM impacts that UFO's have upon humans, but much of the document is about the targeted individual mentioned above, and details all the different ways (human generated) electromagnetic waves can be used to harm people.

Most detailed "official" over view of the real risks posed by all types of electromagnetic waves.

https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170026/

ExomatrixTV

21st March 2023, 16:20

5G Technology Is Biologically Disruptive: 5G Radiation Penetrates Human Blood Brain Barrier

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/o/E/o/N/oEoNi.gaa.mp4

There are no official safety standards for 5G tech, there are only guidelines. Dr. Beverly Rubik joins Stew to talk about how 5G can disrupt the tissue structures inside the human body. 5G can produce oxidative stress, changes in cell membranes, DNA damage, nervous system problems, and reproductive harm. As 5G technology blankets across the earth it will terraform it into an electromagnetic hell scape. There has never been an environmental review of 5G and yet the installation process continues. Dr. Rubiks’s experiments with 4G and 5G cell phones showed decreased blood flow to vital organs. Microwave radiation is a well known and well accepted electromagnetic stresser. Electromagnetism in the environment that is unnatural is something we all have to worry about because we all are at risk.

source (https://rumble.com/v2e15e6-5g-technology-is-biologically-disruptive-5g-radiation-penetrates-human-bloo.html)

ExomatrixTV

24th March 2023, 14:12

Quantum Chemical Warfare - 5G - Vaccines and NanoTech (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120802-Quantum-Chemical-Warfare-5G-Vaccines-and-NanoTech)

ExomatrixTV

27th March 2023, 14:49

School Superintendent Tells Angry Parents It Would Cost “Millions of Dollars” to Cancel 5G Rooftop Antenna Contract
(https://www.activistpost.com/2023/03/school-superintendent-tells-angry-parents-it-would-cost-millions-of-dollars-to-cancel-5g-rooftop-antenna-contract.html)

ExomatrixTV

12th April 2023, 21:39

Parents Protest Cell Tower At Wyandotte Elementary School Michigan: News Compilation:

Nfw0fwNHOoc
In Michigan, parents are protesting the installation of 5G cell antennas on the Wyandotte elementary school. The story has resulted in near daily news coverage. U.S Congressman Shri Thanedar released a press statement saying that the cell tower on top of the school is unacceptable. Michigan state representative James Desana has introduced a bill to restrict cell towers and equipment near schools. EHT submitted a scientific letter on the health effects of cellular radiation to Michigan lawmakers in support of the bill. This is a news compilation of recent reports.

ExomatrixTV

13th April 2023, 15:25

FkzPyxmCwvk

facebook.com/groups/548912049259423 (https://www.facebook.com/groups/548912049259423/)
facebook.com/groups/Stop5G (https://www.facebook.com/groups/Stop5G)

ExomatrixTV

13th April 2023, 17:25

Pulsed Microwave Genotoxic Radiation Human Rights Scandal Switzerland & Worldwide. By Reza Ganjavi

cB02xHWLmco

rezamusic.com/health/emf/EMF (https://www.rezamusic.com/health/emf/EMF)

onawah

14th April 2023, 03:23

Is 5G part of a psyop designed to disconnect us from beneficial energies that the ancients designed into churches, startforts, etc.?
Dutchsinse is connecting the dots on a whole new discovery. See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYFNOHHVtQM
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120618-Starforts-and-Other-Ancient-Anomalies&p=1552203&viewfull=1#post1552203

onawah

14th April 2023, 21:49

100 Consequences of Owning a Cell Phone
4/12/23
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/mb7gDJc6YoPe59_3HT4mS4TQET2g8JVVef1F6ywjC2edwSWKZ5_HKEY4C0FVJArjM3x3FNdIGsiBMtNBkUkqzPjqRYFW8kLQESRV KUoEjKamuIHsslBFc3hlKUeVDaio9sYYczQYLageP9vY6DjCchYMQ1Q_s3VMTC6-pYQxCWo6J0wXogoS9vRHNujpJ6jXn8mcWDhKGlkaP2habh_Js6lWTgsClaRwxXKIrhhTBQzD5i-0egTc1avkJvEtRpmvI2Bl12t3t_bV-HwbWTPuHoFFCQup6F78etUos820fSatujEmGIWnAmrUfiOtirMNU2aUBSg6Rd7jyUgHyyyGoVhrXjckqqKfZHCrlZ2XOeSL6N_5T 6cnluq4rz7yMZM37HakjNL3szmDsKtFLCNWniNr5rsCwFNbDSL-S4w_QMlZDCYsEn99UXIGWZmibupVOOQ_c4TpKODY__mwUDtoSV2PosbMqzTXF0nqEm2huJcHXL9rMjMeugE0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://img.mail.cellphonetaskforce.org/im/2401213/566cf4d51277de639a31693900a568831d1c06a2eded0795e3c01ad8a681bdb3.jpg?e=uD9EX3wEKn45zH-k5gE2cNzGVGEeyjHn5hX78LJSGlMQc-Wyol76M8Xd8yMRLGKiHhbUUJ17NRzyC_Iz22F26tIE9Ir1gHJMOrDff-5ZoldtSboOffkhRU3JzgzYUDi_2Tt33LOpeRwSH6L-vMtbWo52QRzO1LEcVJdS8Z5crUchulO6RtWKnkmlz0Nalaihe8vDYUT79x2ZA9iwFerG1mZHOSLnKI2mV2FZRe8uVkf8

100 CONSEQUENCES OF OWNING A CELL PHONE

Destruction of brain cells
Stroke
Seizures
Tremors
Multiple sclerosis
ALS
Memory loss
Early Alzheimer's disease
Heart attack
Heart disease
Cardiac arrhythmia
Heart palpitations
High blood pressure
Chest pain
Brain cancer
Breast cancer
Thyroid cancer
Lung cancer
Prostate cancer
Colon cancer
Ovarian cancer
Testicular cancer
Melanoma
Obesity
Diabetes
Hypothyroidism
Respiratory infections
Asthma
Infertility
Spontaneous abortion
Birth defects
Hair loss
Hair losing color
Osteoporosis
Broken bones
Constipation
Diarrhea
Eye pain
Dry eyes
Cataracts
Retinal detachment
Glaucoma
Decreased sense of smell
Tinnitus
Hearing loss
Inability to concentrate
Headaches
Insomnia
Sleep Apnea
Nightmares
Fatigue
Dizziness
Vertigo
Nausea
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Muscle pains
Joint pains
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Numbness
Tingling
Nosebleeds
Irritability
Nervousness
Anxiety
Depression
ADHD
Autism
Paranoia
Skin rash
Depression in children
Suicides by children
Heart attacks in young people
Strokes in young people
Cancers in pets
Shortened lives of pets
Proliferation of cell towers to enable cell phones to work
Proliferation of satellites to enable cell phones to work
Disappearance of birds
Deaths of birds
Disappearance of bats
Disappearance of insects
Disappearance of worms
Disappearance of frogs
Disappearance of wildlife
Deaths of wildlife
Dead and dying plants
Dead and dying trees
Dead and dying marine life
Child slavery in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Genocide in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Extermination of the lowland gorilla
Genocide in West Papua
Massive pollution of groundwater in China
Enormous amount of electricity to power the cloud
Enormous amounts of toxic waste
Enormous amounts of discarded plastic
Loss of touch with nature
Social isolation
Loss of touch with reality
_________________________________

Arthur Firstenberg
President, Cellular Phone Task Force
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Administrator, International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
Caretaker, ECHOEarch (End Cellphones Here On Earth)
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org

ExomatrixTV

18th April 2023, 21:28

ZEcRk1YkTBk
To book a ticket, go to alternativeview.co.uk (https://alternativeview.co.uk)
My website 5gawareness.com (https://www.5gawareness.com)

ExomatrixTV

18th April 2023, 21:58

5G : Is It SAFE? - Presented by Ian R Crane:

cdBhOHXUfqY
'Short for 'fifth- generation', 5G wireless technology promises faster download and upload speeds. Mobile network provider EE, claims 5G technology will 'provide a better connection in busy places. 'The technology has already begun to be rolled out across several major UK cities, including London, Cardiff, Manchester, Birmingham and Glasgow, but not everyone is convinced the technology is progress. In fact, 5G technology is a hugely controversial topic, that has caused mass controversy, with many scientists, academics & Health Care professionals voicing concerns about potential health risks. In fact, there is not a single INDEPENDENT Scientific Study PROVING 5G frequencies to be SAFE! Consequently, the 'Precautionary Principle' should be applied pending further study but the 5G agenda is being driven by Corporate Greed ... Health & Well-being then become secondary considerations, until such time as Concerned Communities come together to remove the 'Political Will' to continue rolling out a potentially devastating, ecocidal technology.

Ian R Crane is a former Oilfield Services Executive who spent seven years (2013 - 2019) supporting Communities develop their resistance the UK Government's FRACKING agenda. In late 2017, Ian became aware that the Countrywide Tree-Culling was directly related to the planned roll-out of 5G, due to 'Organic Material' being a BLOCK to 5G frequencies. This prompted him to study the available academic research of the Negative Health Impacts of 5G microwave frequencies. Ian's mantra is to encourage people to do their OWN research ... and his thought-provoking presentation will undoubtedly stimulate further curiosity, particularly amongst those who are already concerned at the pace with which Humanity is being led deeper into technological reliance.'

ExomatrixTV

27th April 2023, 19:14

Non-thermal disruption of β-adrenergic receptor-activated Ca2+ signalling and apoptosis in human ES-derived cardiomyocytes by microwave electric fields at 2.4 GHz

Highlights

•Microwaves at 2.4 GHz are fundamental to today's wireless communication (e.g., 4G, WiFi).
•The non-thermal effects of 2.4 GHz microwaves on biological systems are controversial.
•2.4 GHz microwaves eliminated the response of human heart cells to β-AR stimulation.
•Microwave-disrupted calcium signalling promoted spatially-clustered apoptosis.
•The destructive effects of 2.4 GHz microwaves were mediated by non-thermal mechanisms.

Abstract

The ubiquity of wireless electronic-device connectivity has seen microwaves emerge as one of the fastest growing forms of electromagnetic exposure. A growing evidence-base refutes the claim that wireless technologies pose no risk to human health at current safety levels designed to limit thermal (heating) effects. The potential impact of non-thermal effects of microwave exposure, especially in electrically-excitable tissues (e.g., heart), remains controversial. We exposed human embryonic stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes (CM), under baseline and beta-adrenergic receptor (β-AR)-stimulated conditions, to microwaves at 2.4 GHz, a frequency used extensively in wireless communication (e.g., 4G, Bluetooth™ and WiFi). To control for any effect of sample heating, experiments were done in CM subjected to matched rates of direct heating or CM maintained at 37 °C. Detailed profiling of the temporal and amplitude features of Ca2+ signalling in CM under these experimental conditions was reconciled with the extent and spatial clustering of apoptosis. The data show that exposure of CM to 2.4 GHz EMF eliminated the normal Ca2+ signalling response to β-AR stimulation and provoked spatially-clustered apoptosis. This is first evidence that non-thermal effects of 2.4 GHz microwaves might have profound effects on human CM function, responsiveness to activation, and survival.

1. Introduction

The rapid increase in wireless connectivity of electronic devices (e.g., the Internet of Things (IoT)) has seen microwave-range electromagnetic fields (EMF) emerge as one of the fastest growing forms of electromagnetic exposure [1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib1)]. The ubiquity of ‘human-made’ environmental microwaves (ranging from 1 to 30 GHz and encompassing key designated frequency bands for industrial, medical, and scientific applications) lends urgency to the need to add knowledge on their potential impact on human biology and health. Microwaves heat polar molecules (e.g., water) through a dielectric relaxation, with the absorbed microwave energy being dissipated as heat. In order to prevent potential heating effects, European safety standards limit all domestic microwave-emitting devices (e.g., mobile phones) to an absorption rate of <2 mW/g [2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib2)]. Different interpretations of available data have led to different national guidelines on microwave EMF safety limits [3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib3)].

However, a growing evidence-base refutes the claim that widespread deployment of microwave-frequency wireless technologies (e.g. ‘4G’) poses no risk to human health at currently permitted safety levels [[4] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib4), [5] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib5), [6] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib6)]. Studies involving mobile phones, in particular, are prone to inherent issues such as changing technologies and phone use habits, in addition to low numbers for the unexposed control group. Several questions relating to the safety of microwaves at these frequencies remain unresolved [2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib2),3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib3),7 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib7)].
Microwave EMF impacts on embryonic development (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/embryogenesis) in zebrafish [8 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib8)], chicks [9 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib9)] and humans [10 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib10)] and is also reported to disrupt the function of neurologic [11 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib11)], cardiovascular [[12] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib12), [13] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib13), [14] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib14), [15] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib15)], blood [16 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib16),17 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib17)] and other biological systems [18 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib18)]. The effects of microwaves might be of particular relevance in the context of electrically-excitable tissues, where evidence exists for the disruption of ion handling in in vitro culture systems of brain and heart cells [[19] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib22), [20] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib23), [21] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib24), [22] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib25)]. Although the majority of the effects reported are presumed to be mediated by a thermal (heating) effect of EMF, the contribution of non-thermal mechanism(s) to downstream effects of EMF remains controversial [[7] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib7), [23] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib19), [24] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib20), [25] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib21)].

In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate the functional impact of non-thermal effects of the electric field component of microwaves at a major frequency band used extensively in 4G, Bluetooth™ and WiFi communications (i.e., 2.4 GHz) on human embryonic stem-cell derived CM.

2. Materials & methods

2.1. Materials

Human embryonic stem-cell derived CM (Cytiva™) were obtained from GE Healthcare. All Cytiva™ used in this study were from a single batch (7396634) in which CM comprise 74% of the total cellular component [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27)].

All chemicals were the highest quality available from Sigma unless stated. 10 kD and 70 kD dextrans (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/dextran) (Dex-10 and Dex-70) conjugated to tetramethyl-rhodamine (TMR) were from Molecular Probes (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/molecular-probe). Staurosporine (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/staurosporine) was from Merck. All cell culture reagents were Gibco brand from ThermoFisher except for Matrigel which was obtained from Corning Biosciences. Other materials were obtained from sources as described below.

2.2. Experimental design

CM were randomly allocated to three experimental groups (EMF-exposure (‘EMF’); heating only (‘Heat’); control (‘Ctrl’)). After exposure to these conditions, CM were subsequently randomized again prior to the addition of isoproterenol (‘ISO’) or to vehicle-only (media) control (‘Veh’). To prevent EMF-induced heating raising the temperature of the bulk media to above 37 °C during the 1-min exposure to microwave EMF, CM in the ‘EMF’ group were cooled to 28 °C immediately prior to the application of microwaves. To control for this heating effect, experiments were done in CM-populations cooled to 28 °C and then heated to 37 °C using a programmable heating platform that raised the temperature of the sample at the precise rate measured experimentally in the EMF group (‘Heat’). To control for any heating effect resulting from either direct heating or by EMF exposure, control experiments were also done in which CM were maintained at 37 °C throughout the experimental protocol (‘Ctrl’). The experimental design is shown in Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)A. All data acquired were analysed by operators blinded to the nature of experimental conditions under test. ‘N’ defines the number of discrete CM tubes studied in independent experiments and ‘n’ denotes the number of sub-tubular regions (see Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)).

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr1.jpg

Download : Download high-res image (1MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr1_lrg.jpg)
Download : Download full-size image (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr1.jpg)

Fig. 1. CM networks, microwave instrumentation and experimental design. (A) Experimental design. Black and orange arrows denote addition of vehicle-only (Veh) or ISO (30 nM), respectively. (B) (i) Composite image of a typical CM network produced by tessellation of separate brightfield images (456 × 456 μm each). The boxed area is magnified in (ii) and depicts the ‘tube-like’ CM structures from which data were acquired. (C) Electric (E-) and magnetic (H-) field intensities (simulated using COMSOL) in the bulk resonant cavity (i) and in the plane of the CM (ii) and (iii). (D) Resonance/frequency domain plot showing the maximum absorption of microwaves by the sample occurs at 2.4 GHz. (E) Rates of heating in ‘EMF’ and ‘Heat’ groups (N = 16 and 18, respectively). The average thermal profile (red) was calculated from data obtained from separate experiments (grey). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

2.3. Cardiomyocyte (CM) network formation

CM were seeded in silicone chambers adhered to matrigel-coated glass in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with B27 [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27)]. Before exposure to ‘Ctrl’, ‘Heat’ or ‘EMF’ conditions, CM were transferred from this medium (free [Ca2+] approximately 0.4 mM) into indicator-free Leibovitz (L-15) medium (free [Ca2+] approximately 1.3 mM) and loaded with fluo-4 Ca2+-sensitive reporter [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27)]. All data were acquired from tubular-like CM structures (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)B and Supplementary Movie 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)).

2.4. Microwave instrumentation

Microwave electric (E-) and magnetic (H-) fields were separated using a TM010 mode cylindrical resonant cavity, with samples exposed to the axial E-field (where H is close to zero) [28 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib28),29 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib29)]. The equipment delivered an output power of 19 W rms at 2.4 GHz (at resonance with |S11| of −35 dB) via 10 ms pulses in a 50% duty cycle for a duration of 60 s. The temperature of the aqueous environment in the immediate vicinity of CM was monitored continuously using a fluoroptic sensor (Luxtron, LumaSense Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) which does not interact with the applied microwave fields [30 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib30)].

2.5. COMSOL multiphysics simulation

To visualise E- and H-field distributions within the resonant cavity, and to calculate the field intensity applied to sample cells under test, 3D finite-element simulation was carried out using COMSOL Multiphysics v4.4 [31 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib31)]. The simulation model replicated the experimental conditions: an aluminium microwave cylindrical cavity (relative permittivity (εr), 1; electrical conductivity (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/electric-conductivity) (σ), 3.774e7 S/m) with an input coaxial coupling port (N-type connector), polystyrene confocal culture dish (εr, 2.5; σ, 0) with silica-glass coverslip (εr, 5; σ, 1e-14 S/m), CM contained in a silicone chamber (εr, 3.5; σ, 1e-12 S/m), and L-15 (aqueous) medium (εr, 80-j∗10; σ, 5.5e-6 S/m) [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26)]. The simulated resonant frequency of TM010 mode was 2.4 GHz (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)C).

2.6. Ca2+ imaging and CM frequency stimulation via β-AR activation

Baseline Ca2+ oscillations were recorded in CM maintained at 37 °C in phenol-red-free L-15 medium using resonant-scanning confocal microscopy (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/confocal-microscopy) (Leica SP5) [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27),32 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib32)] (Supplementary Movie 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)). In some experiments the non-selective β-AR agonist, isoproterenol, was used to elicit a sustained increase in oscillatory rate (ISO; 30 nM, prepared via the dilution, in L-15 medium, of a 10 mM ISO stock containing 30 mM ascorbate). To control for the addition of ISO, vehicle-only experiments were done (Veh; L-15 medium containing 100 nM ascorbate). Following simultaneous imaging of brightfield (contractility) and fluorescence (Ca2+) signals, CM-containing chambers were returned to 37 °C/5% CO2 incubation for 4 h prior to quantification of apoptosis.

2.7. Ca2+ signal analysis

Imaging datasets were segmented into symmetric 4 × 4 regional grids (Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) and fluorescent time-series data corresponding to fluo-4-dependent Ca2+ signals were analysed using SALVO software [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27),32 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib32)]. An eleven-parameter output provided a quantitative description of temporal and amplitude features of CM Ca2+ signals (Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)).

2.8. Quantification of the extent and spatial clustering of apoptosis

Apoptosis was measured by quantifying the extent of nuclear DNA fragmentation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/dna-fragmentation) in CM 4 h after Ca2+ imaging using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase) dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) method as per manufacturer's instructions (DeadEnd, Promega). Nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/propidium-iodide) (0.5 μM), samples were mounted under Prolong Gold (Invitrogen) and stored at 4 °C until analysis. In other experiments, staurosporine (1 μM, 4 h) was used to induce maximal apoptosis [33 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib33)]. The spatial clustering of TUNEL-positive nuclei was done using digitized confocal images and a maximum-likelihood probability density function programmed in MatLab (Mathworks) [34 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib34)]. The maximum and minimum extent of spatial clustering of apoptotic nuclei was assigned ‘1’ and ‘0’, respectively.

2.9. Assessing CM membrane intactness using fluorescent-conjugated dextrans

Endogenous CM fluorescence at 575 nm was imaged following excitation using a 543 nm HeNe laser (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/helium-neon-laser). CM were then equilibrated for 5 min with TMR-conjugated Dex-10 and Dex-70 (exmax 555 nm/emmax 580 nm) used at 5 μM to avoid aggregation. Dex-10 or Dex-70-incubated CM were then subject to heating-only or EMF exposure for 1 min and TMR fluorescence was continuously recorded over a subsequent 3 min period. The maximum intracellular accumulation of Dex-10 and Dex-70 was determined following the permeabilization of CM surface membrane using saponin (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/saponin) (0.01% (w/v) in L-15 medium).

2.10. Statistical analysis

All data were tested for normal distribution. No log-transformation of data was done. Pair-wise comparisons of data within the same group (e.g., same CM tube before and after the addition of ISO or vehicle) were compared using paired student's T-test or Mann-Whitney test for normal or non-normally distributed data, respectively. For comparison of more than two groups, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis was used if the data were normally or non-normally distributed, respectively. Where gateway criteria for post-hoc testing were met, Holm-Sidak (normal) or Dunn (non-normal) testing was done. For comparison of more than two groups with two variables (i.e., exposure condition and ISO/vehicle addition), two-way ANOVA was used. Correlation analysis of Ca2+ signalling parameters was done by calculating Spearman correlation co-efficients. All statistical analysis was done using MatLab (Mathworks, vFeb22), and Prism (v9.0, GraphPad).

3. Results

Cytiva™ CM formed spontaneously-organised networks of contractile ‘tubes’ (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)B; Supplementary Movies 1 and 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) which were exposed for 1 min to uniform E-field strength (around 2 kV/m; Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)C (left column)) and negligible H- field strength (<5 A/m; Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)C (right column)) at a frequency of 2.4 GHz (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)D). These conditions produced a linear rate of heating of the aqueous environment immediately surrounding the CM of 0.19 ± 0.02 °C/s (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)E (i)). To control for this thermal effect of EMF, this heating profile was recreated precisely using a programmable heating platform, in the absence of any extrinsic E- or H- fields (0.17 ± 0.02 °C/s; Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)E (ii)).

SALVO was used to generate an eleven-parameter description of the temporal and amplitude features of Ca2+ signalling (see Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) in CM under baseline conditions following exposure to ‘Ctrl’, ‘Heat’ or ‘EMF’ regimes. Baseline Ca2+ signalling parameters including synchronisation, an index of the extent of functional coupling between CM (Supplementary Movie 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)), were comparable in all three experimental groups (Table 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#tbl1)). The rate of Ca2+ release and the rate of Ca2+ decay was equivalently changed in ‘EMF’ and ‘Heat’ groups when compared with CM maintained at 37 °C (‘Ctrl’) (Table 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#tbl1)).
Table 1. Baseline Ca2+ signalling parameters in control, heat-only and EMF exposed CM.
Ca2+-signalling parameterUnitsCONTROL (N = 20)HEAT (N = 24)EMF (N = 21)AverageMinMaxAverageMinMaxAverageMinMaxSynchronisation%65 ± 441.5597.3360 ± 242.3283.0261 ± 343.0884.55FrequencyHz0.64 ± 0.060.301.230.50 ± 0.030.270.830.54 ± 0.040.240.84Temporal heterogeneitya.u.0.19 ± 0.030.050.530.31 ± 0.050.061.220.39 ± 0.070.061.25Amplitude heterogeneitya.u.0.11 ± 0.020.040.340.12 ± 0.020.050.330.11 ± 0.020.030.47Ca2+ spike amplitudeΔF/F01.6 ± 0.130.663.081.92 ± 0.091.362.921.76 ± 0.090.753.24Ca2+ spike durations1.65 ± 0.130.812.721.77 ± 0.061.172.281.78 ± 0.111.182.88Ca2+ spike areaa.u.0.80 ± 0.100.222.400.97 ± 0.070.561.960.91 ± 0.120.331.70Rate of Ca2+ releaseΔF/s209 ± 2373.90484.43129 ± 9∗∗∗66.92230.63139 ± 12∗∗52.54260.24Rate of Ca2+ decayΔF/s−47.1 ± 5.1−15.09−98.07−26.7 ± 1.9∗∗∗−13.42−49.14−26 ± 2∗∗∗−9.24−43.20Ca2+ decay noisea.u.50.1 ± 4.914.4597.5037.4 ± 2.718.3474.9037 ± 312.2758.91Inter-spike noisea.u.0.13 ± 0.010.050.240.14 ± 0.010.080.210.13 ± 0.10.090.19

CM characterised by intercellular synchronisation <40% and oscillatory frequency <0.2 Hz were excluded from analysis as these are indicative of poor cell-to-cell coupling and sub-optimal CM network formation. Parameters are described in Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1) and data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), expressed to one or two significant figures. F, fluorescence; a.u., arbitrary units. ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 compared with control group.

ISO (30 nM) was used to stimulate β-AR-mediated Ca2+ signalling in CM previously exposed to Ctrl, Heat or EMF conditions (Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)A). Paired assessments of baseline Ca2+ signalling, and following a 12-min incubation in ISO, showed that ISO extensively modulated Ca2+ signalling in control CM, including a characteristic increase in oscillatory frequency (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)A, Ctrl and 2B). There were also significant post-ISO changes in Ca2+ signalling in those CM exposed to heating alone, but oscillatory frequency remained unchanged in this group (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)A, Heat and 2B)). Remarkably, CM exposed to EMF did not exhibit any response in Ca2+ signalling following the addition of ISO and no Ca2+ signalling parameters were changed by ISO (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)A, EMF and 2B).

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr2.jpg

Download : Download high-res image (757KB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr2_lrg.jpg)
Download : Download full-size image (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr2.jpg)

Fig. 2. The effect of heat or 2.4 GHz EMF on baseline and ISO-stimulated Ca2+ signalling. (A) Paired assessment of Ca2+ signalling parameters in CM under baseline conditions (grey) and following the addition of ISO (30 nM, 12 min) (black). Data were acquired from CM maintained under under control temperature conditions (Ctrl) or those exposed to heating only (Heat) or to EMF (EMF). Post-ISO data were normalised to separate experiments in which CM were exposed to vehicle-only addition (Veh; see Experimental Design, Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)A). Where the addition of ISO stopped Ca2+ oscillations, data were excluded. Ctrl, N = 8; Heat, N = 11; EMF = 10 CM tubes. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001. (B) Relative changes in Ca2+ signalling parameters following ISO addition were calculated from the data shown in (A). Blue and red denote statistically significant reductions and increases, respectively (p < 0.05). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

An association between disrupted Ca2+ signalling and susceptibility to apoptosis has been reported in CM [35 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib35)]. Since EMF eliminated the response of CM to β-AR stimulation (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)), we explored whether this translated into enhanced sensitivity of CM to apoptosis (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)A). The addition of ISO to ‘Heat’-treated CM resulted in levels of apoptosis comparable to that determined in vehicle-only experiments (6.7% versus 7.7%, respectively; Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)B (i)). However, ISO addition to CM exposed to EMF was associated with significantly increased levels of apoptosis, relative to the vehicle-only group (11% versus 7%; 53% relative increase) (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)B (i)). In control CM maintained at 37 °C, ISO at concentrations up to 100 nM had no measurable impact on the levels of apoptosis (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)B (ii)).

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr3.jpg

Download : Download high-res image (2MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr3_lrg.jpg)
Download : Download full-size image (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr3.jpg)

Fig. 3. ISO-stimulation increases apoptosis in CM exposed to 2.4 GHz EMF, but not to heating alone. (A) Images of apoptotic nuclei (green) in CM (brightfield) in ‘Heat’ and ‘EMF’-groups under baseline (Baseline) or post-ISO (30 nM, +ISO) conditions. Staurosporine (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/staurosporine) (1 μM, 4 h) was used to provoke the maximum extent of apoptosis. (B) (i) Apoptosis in heat- or EMF-exposed CM following the addition of vehicle or ISO. Heat_Veh, N = 63; Heat_ISO, N = 77; EMF_Veh, N = 61; EMF_ISO; N = 61; Staurosporine; N = 21. In (ii), apoptosis in control CM following addition of ISO (0.3–100 nM, 4 h) was measured (N = 20–29). ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001 between designated groups. §, p < 0.001 when compared with any other group.
(C and D) Data from (B) plotted in individual histograms (C) and combined distributions (D).

(E) Spatial clustering of apoptotic nuclei. Heat_Veh, N = 50; Heat_ISO, N = 61; EMF_Veh. N = 45; EMF_ISO, N = 55. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001. N is different from (B) since tubular CM structures with none or one TUNEL-stained nucleus cannot be factored into any calculation of CM clustering. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

In all experimental groups, the extent of apoptosis was variable (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)B (i)). However, there was a pronounced right-shift in the distribution of data acquired from the post-ISO EMF group (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)C and D). To investigate the possibility that some CM within the tubular structures might be differentially susceptible to apoptosis following EMF exposure, we quantified the spatial distribution of apoptotic nuclei under these experimental conditions. The output of a probability density function, used previously to investigate cellular clustering in the post-infarct swine heart [34 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib34)], showed significantly increased spatial clustering of apoptosis in EMF-exposed CM, when compared with those CM exposed to heating alone (clustering index of 0.37 versus 0.26, respectively) (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)E).

Previous work using bacteria has shown that microwaves at a power of around 5 W/g caused membrane poration [36 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib36)]. Our finding that, under the experimental conditions used in the present study, baseline Ca2+ signalling in CM exposed to 2W/g EMF remained largely unchanged (Table 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#tbl1)) suggested strongly that the CM surface membrane remained intact. Corroborating this conclusion, experiments done using TMR-conjugated Dex-10 and Dex-70 revealed negligible accumulation of these fluorescent labels (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/fluorescent-label) in CM following heating-only or EMF exposure (Fig. 4 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig4) and Supplementary Movie 3S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)).

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr4.jpg

Download : Download high-res image (945KB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr4_lrg.jpg)
Download : Download full-size image (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr4.jpg)

Fig. 4. Heating-only or EMF-exposure does not induce CM surface membrane permeability (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/membrane-permeability). (A) Representative images of CM tubes before and after incubation with Dex-10 and Dex-70 in 'Heat' or 'EMF'-treated groups (see 2.9 Methods). Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative images of the effect of saponin (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/saponin) permeabilization (final concentration 0.01% (w/v in L-15 media)) on CM accumulation of Dex-10 and Dex-70. Saponin altered the morphology of some CM tubes under test. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Ratios <0 and >0 denote intra-CM TMR fluorescence as less than, or more than, fluorescence determined in the bulk media, respectively. Heat_Dex-10, N = 18; Heat_Dex-70, N = 25; EMF_Dex 10, N = 18; EMF_Dex-70, N = 20; Saponin (Sap), N = 4 for both Dex-10 and Dex-70. ∗p < 0.05 when compared with Heat and EMF groups using two-way ANOVA.

The temporal and amplitude features of cellular Ca2+ oscillations are highly interconnected and the extent of disruption of these inter-relationships can be used as an index of CM dysfunction [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),27 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib27),35 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib35),37 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib37)]. We hypothesised therefore that, even though there was no change in any discrete Ca2+ signalling parameter in the EMF-treated CM group in response to ISO (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)), the increased levels and spatial clustering of apoptosis determined in this group (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)) might be associated with alterations in the inter-relationships of these Ca2+ signalling parameters. Correlation analysis of the multi-parametric output from SALVO (Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) revealed extensive changes in the inter-relationships of Ca2+ signalling parameters in control, heating-only and EMF CM groups following ISO addition (Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5)A (i), (ii) and (iii), respectively). Directly comparing the data obtained from heat-treated or EMF-exposed CM with those from control CM showed that the nature and extent of changes in inter-parametric correlations following heating alone (Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5)B(i)) or EMF-exposure (Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5)B(ii)) were very different.

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr5.jpg

Download : Download high-res image (989KB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr5_lrg.jpg)
Download : Download full-size image (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-gr5.jpg)

Fig. 5. Different inter-relationships of post-ISO Ca2+ signalling in control, Heat-treated or EMF-exposed CM. (A) Post-ISO inducedchanges in correlation coefficients (post-ISO Δr) of Ca2+ signal descriptors in ‘Ctrl’, ‘Heat’ and ‘EMF’ groups, relative to those determined in the same CM populations under baseline conditions, were calculated. Numeric data are from correlation analysis given in full in Supplementary Fig. 2S, 3S and 4S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1). The extent of synchronisation (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)) is calculated from the analysis of multiple intra-tubular regions (see Supplementary Fig. 1S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) and was not subject to correlation analysis. (B) Post-ISO Ca2+ signalling parameter correlations in ‘Heat’ or ‘EMF’ groups (Supplementary Figs. 3S and 4S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)) were plotted relative to those correlations calculated in post-ISO treated control CM (Supplementary Fig. 2S (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#appsec1)).

4. Discussion

The heart is the human body's largest bioelectrical source, and its normal function depends on the electrical and functional synchronisation of approximately three billion CM in situ [38 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib38)]. This proof-of-concept study is the first to resolve a non-thermal effect of 2.4 GHz EMF on functionally-coupled human CM networks in vitro. A major objective of the work was to employ EMF at power sufficient to elicit a pronounced temperature rise (9 °C, from 28 to 37 °C), so that a clear and obvious thermal effect could be separated from any non-thermal effect. Our experimental configuration, which also incorporated carefully calibrated EMF E-field and attenuated H-field, showed that while thermal effects did modulate CM Ca2+ signalling (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2), Heat and Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5)), only those changes provoked by exposure to 2.4 GHz EMF (i.e., a cumulative thermal and non-thermal effect) elicited increased levels of apoptosis (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2), Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3), Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5)).

Previous studies have reported that the abnormal amplification of low amplitude Ca2+ fluxes, which do not directly contribute to cellular contractility (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/muscle-contractility) under normal conditions, had a profoundly negative impact on CM function and survival [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26),32 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib32),35 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib35)]. Counter to these studies that illustrated a pro-apoptotic role for augmented (non-spike) Ca2+ fluxes, the data reported in this work evidence a new paradigm in which the absence of a β-AR-mediated Ca2+ response in CM exposed to 2.4 GHz EMF (Fig. 2 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig2)) promoted apoptosis (Fig. 3 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig3)).

The data shown in Fig. 5 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig5) confirm that the effects of 2.4 GHz EMF exposure on CM Ca2+ signalling are complex. The similarities between thermal and non-thermal effects on the relationships between Ca2+ signalling parameters in the post-ISO states of ‘EMF’ and ‘Heat’ groups illustrates, perhaps, why it has proved difficult so far to untangle the effects of heating- and non-heating components of microwave E-field exposure. However, these data also highlight that the differences in Ca2+ signalling modulation between heating-only and EMF exposure are likely to be sufficient to underpin the increased apoptotic susceptibility determined in our experiments.

This study was not configured to resolve the specific mechanisms that transduce the impact of EMF exposure into biological perturbations. Formica and Silvestri have advanced the idea that thermal effects arise from energy transfer between external EMF sources and cellular material, and that non-thermal effects occur as a consequence of information transfer between irradiated cells [39 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib39)]. On the latter, a dipole effect involving polarized cellular structures [40 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib40),41 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib41)] is entirely consistent with the theory of ‘Fröhlich's Condensates' [42 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib42),43 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib43)]. It is possible that vibrational modes of the highly polarized surface membrane of the CM used in this study (membrane potential of approximately −80 mV [26 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib26)]) might participate in ‘information coupling’ via resonance interaction with the applied microwave EMF [23 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib19),44 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib44)]. We also speculate that mitochondria could be involved in mediating the non-thermal effects of 2.4 GHz microwaves. Mitochondria form functionally coupled networks, acting as co-incidence detectors to modulate cellular homeostasis (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/homeostasis) and function [45 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib45)]. The high charge-separation across mitochondrial membranes (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/mitochondrial-membrane) might explain the susceptibility of mitochondrial dysfunction to microwave EMF which has been demonstrated by others [18 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib18),21 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib24),[46] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib46), [47] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib47), [48] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib48), [49] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib49)].

Providing mechanistic clarity on how non-thermal effects of microwave EMF disrupt cellular electrical excitability will not be straightforward. For example, measuring the functional impact of microwaves on surface-membrane voltage-gated channels, that are characterised by open-closed kinetics in the nanosecond range, is not possible. There are also practical issues that negate the use of electrophysiologic approaches such as interference caused by the applied microwave E-field on the electronic recording equipment used (e.g. patch clamp).

The intriguing finding that ISO provoked increased levels of spatially-clustered apoptosis in EMF-exposed CM, but not in heat-treated CM, suggests that non-thermal effects of EMF might be variably transduced into biological abnormalities that are predicated by individual CM status in the highly-coupled CM network. It is plausible, but remains to be tested, that the functional uncoupling of sub-populations of damaged CM in these networks might lead to their increased susceptibility to the effects of EMF. This might have relevance therefore to future efforts to develop the therapeutic utility of microwave EMF in targeted destruction of specific sub-populations of cells in damaged tissue (e.g., cellular ablation in post-infarcted myocardium).

5. Study limitations and other considerations

To maximize the likelihood of eliciting a measurable thermal and non-thermal effect on the biological processes (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/biological-phenomena-and-functions-concerning-the-entire-organism) that modulate cellular Ca2+ signals, our study used microwave power levels equivalent to an absorption of approximately 3 W/g. This is more than 1000-times higher than the recommended specific absorption rate (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/specific-absorption-rate) (SAR) safety threshold in Europe and the US. It is unlikely that exposure to microwaves at this power will be encountered in everyday life. However, pulses of GHz-frequency microwaves at powers that exceed10W have been used for imaging via thermoacoustic emission [50 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib50)] and in therapeutic applications, including in the treatment of hypothermia and cancer [51 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib51)]. The temperature change in both ‘Heat’ and ‘EMF’ groups (9 °C acheived at a rate of heating of 0.2 °C/s, Fig. 1 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig1)E) did not produce measurable increases in the extent of apoptosis (Fig. 4 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#fig4)). However, there might be other downstream biological consequences in response to this large thermal gradient that we did not investigate.

In this proof-of-concept work we did not investigate the power-, frequency-, pulse- or time-dependence of EMF effects. Since the perturbation of biological processes might be related to EMF frequency in a highly non-linear manner [39 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib39)], adding knowledge on these variables will require further work. Microwaves at a frequency of 2.4 GHz were used owing to the relevance of this frequency to 4G communications, Bluetooth™ and WiFi. Next generation communication systems (e.g., 5G and above) will use higher frequencies for greater data bandwidth and gaining new knowledge on the functional impact of these higher frequencies on human health is a priority area for future study.

The data reported in this study show that non-thermal effects of EMF fundamentally remodel β-AR -stimulated Ca2+ signalling and lead to increased levels of apoptosis. We recognise though that there might be other downstream consequences of EMF exposure, on aspects of CM behaviour distinct from apoptosis induction, that we did not explore.
We also only exposed CM to microwave E-field since a previous study on the exposure of photoluminescent bacteria to EMF (where light output was used as a biological marker) showed that the magnetic H- field, albeit a necessary component of an electromagnetic wave (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/electromagnetic-radiation), had no influence on the state of the bacteria over the full range of microwave power levels used [29 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#bib29)]. Whilst our experimental configuration purposely attenuated the applied magnetic H-field therefore, it is conceivable that exceptionally high H-fields might modulate cell and tissue function under some circumstances.

Author contributions

Study conception and design: CFW, DL, AP, CHG.
Experimental work and computer modelling: CFW, CH, CLJ, HC, AP, CHG.
Data and statistical analysis: CFW, CH, JSC, JZ, RGP, AWO, RD, CHG.
Manuscript drafting and editing: CFW, HC, AP, CHG.

Data and resource availability

All raw data and computer code generated in this study is available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Christopher George reports financial support was provided by British Heart Foundation. Christopher George reports financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust. Christopher George reports financial support was provided by European Union. Adrian Porch reports financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust. Catrin Williams reports financial support was provided by Welsh Government. Heungjae Choi reports financial support was provided by Welsh Government. Christopher George is a Board Member of the National Centre for Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and Chairs the Grants Assessment Panel.

Acknowledgements/Research Funding

The study was supported by a Sêr Cymru II Fellowship part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government (TG/KJB/VSM:1063339 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#gs1)) to CFW and (TG/KJB/VSM:1103515 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#gs1)) to HC; Wellcome Trust Infrastructural Support Fund to CHG and AP; British Heart Foundation Programme Grant (RG/15/6/31436 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#gs3)) to CHG; a Swansea University Research Excellence Studentship (SURES) to AWO/CHG; EU/WEFO award to CHG (T37/18 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473?fbclid=IwAR3-N--_P_H-GcoMCEok1h3AuqbyEADj4JmhT09K-a_-Nyr_zOi_KC721t8#gs4)).

Appendix A. Supplementary data

What’s this? (https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/19286/supporthub/sciencedirect/)The following are the Supplementary data to this article.

Download : Download Acrobat PDF file (7MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-mmc1.pdf)
Multimedia component 1.
Download : Download video (15MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-mmc2.mp4)
Multimedia component 2.
Download : Download video (20MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-mmc3.mp4)
Multimedia component 3.
Download : Download video (16MB) (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0006291X23004473-mmc4.mp4)
Multimedia component 4.

source (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X23004473)

ExomatrixTV

4th May 2023, 12:21

Measuring 5G Electric Fields Strength With Software Defined Radios (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9955380)

5G and COVID Symptoms: Dr. Magda Havas

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/E/Y/U/p/EYUpj.gaa.mp4

Expert researcher Dr. Magda Havas sheds light on the potential link between Electromagnetic Interference and COVID-19 symptoms and discusses the role of 5G technology deployment during global lockdowns.

Sign the Petition | Donate | Make it Happen

nationalcitizensinquiry.ca (https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca)

source (https://rumble.com/v2kcqe6-5g-and-covid-symptoms-dr.-magda-havas-saskatoon-day-3-national-citizens-inq.html?fbclid=IwAR32ndSTlZdobV0ISINZoAmd3klLK0dk2sYCeOzOdVsJ_B3pnenqu_Nl5-c)

Measuring 5G Electric Fields Strength With Software Defined Radios (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9955380)

ExomatrixTV

4th May 2023, 13:20

5G The Invisible Rainbow — Arthur Firstenberg

https://seed132.bitchute.com/q2K1sr7KzBaC/JDdyYpPVIDO4.mp4

source (http://thephaser.com/2023/04/5g-the-invisible-rainbow-arthur-firstenberg)

Invisible Rainbow: A History of EMFs and Health

e-l1gro7wFU

Arthur Firstenberg: Is Our Tech Making Us Sick?

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/Q/m/k/k/Qmkkh.caa.mp4

Speaking at General Assembly Meeting #68 on Monday, December 5, Arthur Firstenberg gave an eye-opening presentation on the harmful effects of wireless technology.

Arthur is a scientist, journalist and author who is part of a growing worldwide movement to bring attention to the most ignored threat to life on Earth. His book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, is the first book to tell the history of electricity from an environmental point of view.

The Cellular Phone Task Force, an organization he co-founded in 1996, provides a global clearinghouse for information about wireless technology’s harmful effects, and a support network for the millions of people injured by this tech.

After graduating Phi Beta Kappa from Cornell University with a B.A. in mathematics, he attended the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine from 1978 to 1982.

Watch the rest of the meeting:
➨ worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/general-assembly-meeting-68 (https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/general-assembly-meeting-68)

source (https://rumble.com/v1zi8mi-arthur-firstenberg-is-our-tech-making-us-sick.html)

ExomatrixTV

4th May 2023, 13:26

The Invisible Rainbow - A History Of Electricity And Life - By Arthur Firstenberg:

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/Y/z/c/e/Yzced.gaa.mp4

Original title: Arthur Firstenberg - "The Invisible Rainbow" - The Hidden Dangers of Wireless & Cell Phone Radiation

The Hidden Dangers of Wireless & Cell Phone Radiation»

cellphonetaskforce.org (https://cellphonetaskforce.org)

Audio EQ'ed and compressed for maximum quality fidelity. The soundtrack is from an audio recording of an interview conducted by Tonio Epstein and scientist Arthur Firstenberg that was published on Soundcloud by WGDR, Goddard College Community Radio, Plainfield, United States,on April 6, 2018. Arthur Firstenberg is a scientist and journalist who is at the forefront of a global movement to tear down the taboo surrounding this subject. After graduating Phi Beta Kappa from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics, he attended the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine from 1978 to 1982. Injury by X-ray overdose cut short his medical career. For the past thirty-five years he has been a researcher, consultant, and lecturer on the health and environmental effects of electromagnetic radiation, as well as a practitioner of several healing arts.

source (https://rumble.com/vulgtu-the-invisible-rainbow-a-history-of-electricity-and-life-by-arthur-firstenbe.html)

onawah

5th May 2023, 01:49

RESTORED HEALTH AND VITALITY
FROM DITCHING MY CELL PHONE
by Kathleen Burke
https://cellphonetaskforce.org/restore-health-and-vitality-from-ditching-my-cell-phone-k-burke/
https://cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/woman-throwing-phone-in-trash-20-768x457.jpg

"For the health and safety of all living beings, please read this newsletter only from a hardwired device with the deadly Bluetooth antenna and wireless turned OFF, or a printed hard copy. If these are not available to you, please begin taking the steps today to make them so.
**************
A year ago, I was leading a normal, full, active life with no idea of the damage my mobile phone was doing to me. On July 1, 2022, I cancelled my mobile phone service (“cell phone” in the U.S) and turned off the wireless function on my computer as well as the modem. I made these changes at the request of my respected ally and colleague, Arthur Firstenberg. In order to work together I had to experience, first-hand, the shedding of wireless technology, and I had to be willing to “be the change”. It seemed extreme at the time, and as readers may recall, I even cried over the matter before making my final decision. But ten months into this experiment my life is different, and better.

When people ask me if I regret having given up my cell phone, my answer is unequivocally “No”. I don’t miss texting on a phone. I don’t miss GPS. I don’t miss reading news that some news aggregator selected for me. I don’t miss QR codes for this, that and everything else. I do not regret ridding myself of having a cell phone and I would not go back to having one.

I generally feel better… a lot better! Before the wireless purge I was waking up five-six times a night, walking to the bathroom only to urinate minimally and returning to bed; sometimes falling back to sleep, sometimes not. In the weaning off process, I began sleeping better and I now sleep deeply every night and wake up maybe once a night. I also had had chronic stomach aches in the early morning for ten years. Doctors ruled out acid reflux, ulcers, etc. The stomach aches are now gone, entirely. I had frequent nightmares, and I often had headaches upon waking. Those are all gone as well. I wake up happy now instead of lethargic and depressed. Who knew?

My energy level changed noticeably after giving up my phone. I went from long days surrounded by wireless technology which rendered me exhausted, to equally long workdays ending still healthy feeling and still energetic. Now I easily move from the end of the workday to getting on my bicycle or hiking boots and going, rather than languishing due to low energy. This is the primary reason I will not go back to wireless phone or wireless computer. My life, my living is that much better now. I haven’t needed acupuncture for several months. My prana is better. My chi is stronger.

Other things I have noticed: my hair is growing in healthier and I have noticed more new hair growth along my hairline. In my cell phone using days I lost a lot of hair. There was a one-year period, 2016-2017, when I engaged in a lot of high-stress work and carried two cell phones at the time. I lost about one third of the hair on my head during that period and my hair greyed at a rate faster than I had previously seen. At the time I believed that it was simply stress which caused my hair loss. Now, I see it differently. I believe it was the result of having two cellphones near me and in operation at nearly all times. Two cellphones in close proximity produce a tremendous amount of toxic, I call them “slow death”, microwaves, though in truth, for many people they are “fast death” microwaves; those causing cardiac events, for instance. My body reacted to all the radiation. My cells coped, but poorly. I am experiencing a recovery now. My weight has normalized, which would be expected if my cells are now functioning better.

Once I began weaning myself off the cellphone, prior to shutting off my service altogether, I only powered it on rarely. When I began that process, I noticed that when I looked at the screen while powering on the phone, I felt quick and sharp pains in my face. They were subtle, but obvious, something like invisible low-pain darts hitting my face. I had never before felt these pains. I only felt them when I used the phone and only very briefly. I took that as a warning and further reason to get rid of the phone. I have not felt those pains again since except when the Bluetooth was accidentally turned back on in my computer for a few weeks—a few weeks during which my vision deteriorated for no reason that I could fathom until I realized the Bluetooth was on. I turned it off immediately and make sure that it is off every morning when I boot up.

The immediate effects from wireless are not noticed by most of us who have become accustomed to the damage microwave radiation is doing to us. Decreased health and vitality—and increased diseases and demand for medications—is thought of as “normal”. When I was carrying two cell phones I did not “feel” the effects they were having on my body. I didn’t “feel” my mitochondria. I didn’t “feel” cell death. I didn’t relate the deterioration of my body to my use of devices. But that is what was happening. I was aging myself prematurely, unknowingly.

Before I cancelled my service, I spent two months deeply researching the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living beings. I read peer-reviewed studies, books, reports from scientists around the world, and more. I found references to thousands of such studies, both recent and dating back decades. I read Arthur’s book, The Invisible Rainbow, and the compelling history of the dangers of wireless technology as well as electricity, and their deadly effect on living organisms.

I am reminded in this moment that two of the most intelligent, and youthful “senior” (they don’t seem senior) people I know do not own a cellphone and swore them off years and years ago. This cannot be an accident. These are the only other two adults I personally know at the time of this writing who do not own a cell phone, aside from the many kind folks who have contacted me via the Cellular Phone Task Force. They are exceptionally “alive” people.

A few weeks ago I discovered that a dear friend was living in a home riddled with RF radiation. This friend and I watch out for each other. He is almost 80 years of age and was formerly enthusiastic about tech and a big consumer of it. I believed that he had checked his home thoroughly with an RF meter last year and that his home was relatively safe. Just to be sure, I thought I better check.

I was shocked to see my RF meter flashing red, meaning “evacuate the area at once”, in his bedroom and in his office where he spends roughly three quarters of his life. The source of the incredibly high levels of radiation? Three cordless phones distributed around the home, a printer with a built-in wireless/Bluetooth connection, a modem which was mistakenly believed to have had the wireless function turned off, a state-of-the-art desktop PC which even though plugged into the Ethernet with the WiFi turned off was emitting like crazy because the Bluetooth was on. He and his three cats were bathed in radiation in their own home, which reminds me to point out that radiation from home devices, and associated illnesses and extinctions, are becoming more insidious, not less, still.

His wife died from complications (a fall) from advanced Parkinson’s disease. There was never an explanation given by any doctor for what caused the progressive Parkinson’s leading to her death. She was heavily irradiated in her home, which was the above scenario, plus two additional cell phones, and two additional PCs using wireless. She could not overcome the dense radiation in her home, where she also worked and taught piano. My friend, a man with obviously strong genes, was barely overcoming it; sleeping with a CPAP machine for sleep apnea while living in the midst of off-the-charts radiation. He was moving around his life in something of a zombie state. I witnessed it. This is when I met him. He often had trouble initiating walking, though he was perfectly able to walk. Often, I observe this semi-zombified state in people around me.

Even his indoor cats seemed neurotic, with patches of hair loss and various acting out of the norm. I look forward to seeing them improve now that the radiation is being brought to below “need to evacuate” levels after 20+ years of increasing radiation. They will all enjoy drastic improvements.

Another experience which reinforced my certainty about what wireless technology is doing to the world was my trip to the COP 27 in Egypt last November, where the entire grounds of the convention center were heavily irradiated at all times. My RF meter flashed red in every nook and cranny of the convention center where numerous cell towers lorded overhead disguised as palm trees. The out-of-doors was equally irradiated and essentially everywhere every person was on a cell phone at almost all times, partly because no conference information was made available on paper, not even maps of the intricate multi-facility conference grounds. It was estimated that over 40,000 people were present.

Sharm El-Sheikh is a modern tourist town where landlines are nowhere an option. The condominium complex where I stayed had wireless connections throughout and my housemates of course had their cell phones. Due to being heavily irradiated, I did not sleep for four nights upon my arrival and was subsequently placed in hospital, very depleted, where I required IV fluids and sedatives. Interestingly, the doctor’s four different sedatives did not work, which I can only attribute to the extremely high level of radiation at the hospital, because normally I am highly sensitive to medication. Again, the “evacuate at once” red flashing light on my RF meter. With some chagrin, when my legs began involuntarily spasming I left the hospital AMA (against medical advice), much to the physician’s displeasure. I did my best to smooth things over and finally slept on the fifth night at the condominium thanks to my kind housemate’s Melatonin and a space in the bedroom I identified with lower radiation.

There was a near total absence of birds at this the southernmost tip of the Sinai Peninsula, even though it was migration season. I saw a few flocks fly past out on the Red Sea, but not more than a dozen birds on shore and inland during the two weeks I was visiting. Birds simply are few there, despite plentiful palm trees and flowering shrubs. There was an unsettling quiet all around. Fortunately, a plentiful array of tropical fish still inhabit the sea there.

It was a tremendous relief to get back to the safety of my home where I resumed my journey to health and vitality again.

I gave up my cell phone and wireless service for a number of reasons, three of those being:

the preservation of my life and health, and that of my pets
the preservation of the creatures that keep this planet, my garden, and the refuges where I hike, lively, abundant and habitable
and concern for the survival of all species
Removing radiation in the home is like shaking off a debilitating disease. It has made for the restoration of a more beautiful and graceful life, one I thought I had simply lost. I am again feeling well and sleeping well. I am no longer damaging brain cells, destroying my blood brain barrier, or endangering my mitochondria; all things which compromise our wellbeing and what is needed for longevity and happiness.

In addition to being healthier, I am also freer now. My living is less interrupted by alerts and rings, many of which, in retrospect were superfluous. My friends and colleagues still matter to me every bit as much as they did before. Perhaps they matter more as my life has simplified. My time with them today is richer and feels better because I feel better. My social life improved qualitatively. I care for my friends and associates near and far and I sense they still care for me equally. Not carrying a cell phone has not changed that reality nor my ability to access life and love.

Having detached from the news aggregator which I previously used frequently on my phone has also improved my life. The news aggregator was informative, yes, but heavily propagandized like most news today; essentially an echo chamber endlessly looping propaganda at me. I am glad to be free of that. I am no longer bombarded by upsetting and intrusive hyped news all day long. I pick up news here and there. I am less propagandized. I feel less propagandized, and freer.

Desperately, my colleagues and I want the extinction of species to stop. I am thrilled by the birds and insects that make this planet productive. I have already envisioned a planet with the numbers of birds and insects returned. It is suspected that radiation is responsible for “half or more” of the species lost in the Seventh Mass Extinction which is ongoing. My garden is visited by relatively few birds and even fewer butterflies; just a few moth species. I saw some juvenile praying mantises last spring but never saw a single adult. Even worms are few. Climate change, pesticides and deforestation are factors, but radiation is a larger, more destructive factor, not smaller. Most of the world is downplaying, ignoring and even suppressing the destructive role of radiation as regards extinction.

Thanks to insights from the researcher Diana Kordas on the Greek island of Samos, I have come to understand that while I make choices around my personal use of deadly wireless technology, beyond my little bubble are all the creatures who have no say in a matter which is about life and death. Quite possibly their entire species are being irradiated to extinction by man-made wireless technology. I have a choice; they do not. Like on Samos, there are distressingly few signs of living animal creatures in my local mountains. There are increasingly fewer places to which they can escape from cell towers, cell phones and the like, and in many instances, no place at all. Hence extinction.

Tonight is a cool spring night in the high desert of the southwest U.S. It is quiet outside. The city where I live is not a typical bustling wealthy American city and I suspect most people are at home, perhaps at rest. Home, generally the place to which we go for safety and warmth. I wonder, as we are nestled here in our respective retreats, “Is home a place of safety anymore? Has home become as dangerous or more than the streets of a high-crime city?”. Consider nearly every home and public place in developed countries and beyond has at least one modem emitting deadly EMFs day and night, and one or more cell phones. Add to that a smart meter (wireless utility meters affixed to homes), perhaps a baby monitor, and all other sorts of other wireless gadgets.

My house is a haven and I am safer here, as are my pets. I fear for their well-being but know that they are protected here, at least. Even my dear neighbor’s new cat has chosen my home, which measures as far safer than the home where he is meant to be living. At least I can provide a haven for these few and for myself. I am much relieved that my pets are more safe, not less in my home.

A month after my return from Egypt, the subject line for one of the world’s most circulated newspapers, a popular U.S. publication, read: “The Morning: a happier new year, develop stronger relationships in 2023”. The first paragraph: “For over 80 years, researchers at Harvard have studied what makes for a good life. They found one surefire, scientifically proven predictor of happiness: developing warmer relationships.” The publication went on to say, “What emerged is that a crucial element of happiness is relationships.” One might question, what about those of us who have highly developed, ongoing warm relationships and relative happiness? What would be the challenge for us in 2023?

I am a big fan of warm relationships. If I am going to fry I would prefer to do so in the arms of a beloved. But let’s be clear, in the current dire state of what we, the living beings on Earth, are faced with, love is not enough. Warm relationships cannot reverse utter cell destruction and death from radiation. We here at the Cellular Phone Task Force will be much more optimistic on January 1 of next year if a headline were to read, “The Morning: a happier new year, cell towers being removed worldwide in 2024 as cell phone ownership declines and world leaders declare microwave radiation destroying the health of all species”.

There is no lasting happiness without health, according to the ancient medical system of Ayurveda. And health is becoming more and more elusive on this planet as every day a web of deadly radiation more densely blankets our planet; our home, Earth. There are scientists studying the effects of electromagnetic fields and radiation who predict humanity will only survive two more years on the planet due to radiation. There are many more scientists flagrantly ignoring this possibility altogether.

It is not unreasonable to conclude that in this current world of destructive microwave radiation “safety” is no longer a reality anywhere. I have relatively low electromagnetic frequencies in my home because of the precautions I have taken and I have walls built of mud bricks, which helps. But my home is not entirely safe and won’t be as long as wireless technology dominates and destroys our planet. We at the Cellular Phone Task Force encourage you and your families to join us by “being the change”.

Here is a short list of our top reasons to ditch your cell phone and other wireless devices:

Protect your health and happiness, including your brain, and minimize your need for medical intervention.
Protect your children’s happiness and their development, especially their brains.
Preserve your youth.
Protect your pets.
Protect your surroundings and gardens; pollinators, soils, plants, neighbors, wildlife.
Preserve species from extinction.
Preserve life on the planet.
Kathleen Burke is the executive assistant to Arthur Firstenberg, celebrated American scientist, anti-wireless activist, and author of the internationally acclaimed The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press 2017; Chelsea Green Publishing 2020) published in ten languages, as well as Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution (Cellular Phone Task Force 1996 and 1997) and president of the Cellular Phone Task Force. She authored the paper “How to Break Up with Your Cell Phone” (Cellular Phone Task Force 2022).

Kathleen is a gardener, hiker, and practitioner of Ayurveda in the US desert Southwest where she resides. She holds a certificate in Ayurvedic Medicine from the Ayurvedic Institute, Dr. Vasant Lad, BAMS. For reasons of personal health and the environment, Kathleen permanently gave up her mobile phone and ended her use of wireless devices in June, 2022 and has never regretted it. She can be reached at kathleenmariaburke@yahoo.com."

__________________

Cellular Phone Task Force
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org
May 3, 2022

Kathleen has been invited to go to England to speak at the
Better Way Conference in Bath, held June 2-4, 2023.

ExomatrixTV

11th May 2023, 03:43

MqMj_L-Qqu4
“Today’s mighty oak is just yesterday’s nut that held its ground.”

As one of the world’s pre-eminent professional conspiracy theorists, David Icke has been a regular guest on London Real, discussing topics as diverse as 5G, 9/11 and censorship.

Often described as a maverick or a renegade, David is a unique voice in the space, propounding a number of predictions around his post-Orwellian vision of society and the future.

Since his spiritual awakening in 1990, David enjoys a sizable global following, regularly speaking for up to 10 hours at venues such as Wembley Arena to audiences of thousands of people.

As well as public speaking, David is an acclaimed author having written over 20 books including The Robots’ Rebellion (1994), And The Truth Shall Set You Free (1995), The Biggest Secret (1999) and Children of the Matrix (2001), in which he developed his worldview of New Age thinking.

With a mission to wake up society and free our minds from what governments and mainstream media are trying to make us do, his credentials make him one of the most influential thinkers and catalysts for change.

In this interview, David talks extensively about the Coronavirus (Covid-19), how governments manipulate their citizens and the wider agenda behind social control and a Surveillance Society; in a wide-ranging session, watch London Real’s founder and host Brian Rose and David engaging across a range of conspiracy-related themes.

Offering more than meets the eye on first glance, David Icke is a man with serious credentials and a challenging perspective on our species and planet.

🍿 Watch the full interview for free at: freedomplatform.tv/1000000-fighting-for-freedom (https://freedomplatform.tv/1000000-fighting-for-freedom/)

ExomatrixTV

11th May 2023, 14:12

Google search: "Microwave Sickness Symptoms (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/government-knew-harmful-impact-wireless-technology-human-health)" + Navy + Declassified + PDF

The US Navy used the same type of pulsed frequencies range in the 1970s & 1980s that is much closer to #5G than 4G ... back then they KNEW the long term harmful EMF Effects ... The US Navy even made a list of symptoms that is very similar to what we now call: "COVID Symptoms" <<< That does NOT mean we claim: "5G created the Virus" <<< that is how some trolls & fake Anti-5G (posers) inject & spread dis-info meme tactics ... So that we get falsely accused & smeared by corrupt "fact-checkers" sites.

They hope people stay dumb and be told "how to think & judge" not using any common sense of your own. Trained like an obedient, willful slave.

5G is Military Grade Technology ... that is why they use the military term: We "deployed" the 5G small cell towers with 8x8 phased array omnidirectional beamforiming antenna's ... that CAN be weaponized if need be for "crowd control" admitted by multiple mainstream sources!

Between 2017 and 2019 I told everybody multiple times on record that 5G Tech that is close to you will affect (y)our immune system cumulatively ... so much so that a normal flu/cold can become deadlier for certain weaker people (having already other underlying comorbidity causes) ... that does NOT mean it will happen to everybody, that depends heavily on:

01. Lifestyle.
02. Duration Exposure!
03. Proximity of the Transmitter to your body.
04. Other Erratic Pulsed Microwave sources like: 4G Towers, WiFi, Bluetooth, Smart meters, Smartwatches etc. etc.
05. Overall Health Condition.

Many do not understand the term: "Cumulative Harmful" ... so let me explain that in layman terms:

"If you give a drop of alcohol to a 5-year young child, is that "dangerous" or "deadly"? Everybody would say NO! ... But what if you secretly give it every 5 minutes a drop of alcohol 24 hours a day 7 days a week >>> there will be a point that this young child behaves differently and may even die! That is what I mean with "cumulative harmful".

For some the EMF effects will show in just 1 year, for others in 5 years of exposure depending on your health condition ... For weaker people it will be much faster and when someone "mysteriously" dies, most Doctors will NOT consider being exposed to multiple microwave sources ... they only focus on what they are told to focus upon. >>> The world would be literary a different place if all Doctors using a light-microscope analyzing the blood & blood cells of their patients keeping records of the past and compare the pictures/videos if something is changing drastically or not. <<< If that happens, they only have to ask what was different between two measure points.

It may well be that someone moved very close to a 4G Cell Tower or 5G mast, or they have a new smart meter installed, or they use a new Wifi or use a new "Smartphone" every day "for work" etc. You see, there are PLENTY of options to fight this and to expose what is going on scientifically. But the mass media acts dumb, or they willfully ARE dumb and want to say dumb about it ... What is worse here?

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles May 11, 2023 🦜🦋🌳
Founder of #Stop5G Fb Group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/Stop5G)
Creator of this Forum Thread (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-)!!

source (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/posts/1664893183945830)
PDF (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Medical%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20Wi-Fi%20Wireless%20Devices%20and%20%20Smart%20Meters%20-%20Book%20Two%208.10.16.pdf)
zoryglaser.com (https://zoryglaser.com)
padrak.com/vesperman (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman)

Ernie Nemeth

11th May 2023, 14:20

Just to keep it fresh in everyone's mind, and it is probably already pointed out somewhere in this thread, 5G was being rolled out the beginning of 2020, just as the covid scam began.

Since the 'virus' displays the same symptoms as 5G technology side effects, the ill effects of the 5G roll-out were hidden by the 'viral outbreak'.

It is valid to ask: 'How many of those with the wide gamut of 'symptoms' claimed to have been caused by the virus were actually reacting to 5G as it was turned on all over the world?'

ExomatrixTV

11th May 2023, 14:59

The 1st book: Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers (Rev. 8/17/16, 7/2/16, and Rec. 6/26/16) (*.pdf file) (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Medical%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20Wi-Fi%20Wireless%20Devices%20and%20%20Smart%20Meters%208.17.16.pdf)
Gary Vesperman's First Book regarding the hazards and health effects of these toxic devices. 233 Pages.

The 2nd book: Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers, Book 2 (Rev. 8/17/16 and Rec. 8/10/16) (*.pdf file) (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Medical%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20Wi-Fi%20Wireless%20Devices%20and%20%20Smart%20Meters%20-%20Book%20Two%208.10.16.pdf)
Gary Vesperman's Second Book regarding the hazards and health effects of these toxic devices. 190 Pages.

The 3rd book: Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers - Book Three (Rec. 9/17/16) (*.pdf file) (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Possible%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20and%20Towers%20Book%203.pdf)
Gary Vesperman's Third Book regarding the hazards and health effects of these toxic devices. 227 Pages.

The 4th book: Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers - Book Four (Rec. 12/13/16) (*.pdf file) (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Medical%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20and%20%20Towers%20Book%204.pdf)
Gary Vesperman's Fourth Book regarding the hazards and health effects of these toxic devices. 239 Pages.

The 5th book: Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers - Book Five (Rec. 12/21/16) (*.pdf file) (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman/Medical%20Hazards%20of%20Cell%20Phones%20and%20%20Towers%20Book%205.pdf)
Gary Vesperman's Fifth Book regarding the hazards and health effects of these toxic devices. 108 Pages.

padrak.com/vesperman (http://www.padrak.com/vesperman)

ExomatrixTV

11th May 2023, 19:19

673yA_kSWBs

onawah

27th May 2023, 04:37

Pulsed Electro Magnetic Field And 5G Exposure Experiments With C19 Vaccinated Blood
Beware Graphic Images
Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
MAY 26, 2023
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/pulsed-electro-magnetic-field-and?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F28548800-bc97-4589-971b-43a3d81d27b1_1196x669.png

"I have previously posted our findings on clotting evaluation of C19 vaccinated blood. Blood samples had been drawn of three C19 vaccinated individuals. Two were vaccine injured and one was completely asymptomatic. All of the samples formed a yellowish rubbery layer on top after the sample was left standing for 4 hours at room temperature. This yellowish layer was rubbery and not mechanically dissolvable. As I have previously written about, I believe this is hydrogel polymer separating from the blood. You can see these experiments here - please review the previous article for contextual understanding:

Visual Inspection Of C19 Vaccinated Live Blood Clots - Rubber (Hydrogel) Like Substance Found - Beware Graphic Images
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1300,h_650,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F841c5014-71aa-4e04-bbce-2b7946f92801_448x601.png

Image: Four vaccinated Blood Samples left to sit for 4 hours I have posted the work of Clifford Carnicom and myself showing that Near Infrared Spectroscopy performed on C19 vaccinated and unvaccinated blood repetitively identified the spectral signature of functional chemical groups indicating polymer hydrogels.

Read full story: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/visual-inspection-of-c19-vaccinated

It is very important to note that completely asymptomatic C19 vaccinated individuals have the same blood clotting findings as the vaccine injured. About a year ago, I first discussed Computerized Thermography of C19 Vaccinated people who were asymptomatic as a detection method for asymptomatic blood clots. This would be challenging to roll out on a mass scale due to limited access to thermography and cost. This new method presented here, simply requires a blood draw and it is possible to see the severity of the plastic like hydrogel layer within 45 minutes. To ensure adequate time of hydrogel coagulation, we left the samples for 4 hours in our previous tests.

In this next set of experiments we wanted to answer important questions on what effect does 5G radiation exposure have on the development of the yellowish rubbery zone - which I presume to be hydrogel polymer - based on all our previous experiments with Clifford Carnicom and my research. Many people have suggested to disable the nanotechnology and synthetic biology with pulsed electromagnetic fields. The idea comes from the understanding that you can wipe out a cell phone drive and its programming with such pulsed electromagnetic fields - hence the hope was that the suspected nanotechnological program should also be disabled via such a method.

In the first set of experiments, four syringes of 30ml blood from a C19 vaccine injured individual was drawn. One syringe was exposed to 40 min of 5G radiation by a 5 G tower. Another syringe was exposed to 40 min of 5G radiation and 3 minutes of PEMF. Two syringes were placed in a Faraday bag immediately after blood draw as a control. All samples were inspected after 4 hours and images were taken.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F85dbb25a-8e47-4a99-9cf6-45edd9a7280f_1199x669.png

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcb2345c4-af00-46c3-8cb2-e01540b36e5b_1176x660.png

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbbbdf5c8-d784-4d25-b859-16e9de78b64a_1184x645.png

No significant difference was detected in the blood clots exposed to 5G, PEMF or the Faraday bag shielding. It appeared as if the PEMF was helping break down the clot. Hence the next experiment was performed. The C19 vaccinated individual had a whole body exposure to the PEMF for 3 minutes. Then blood was drawn again and inspected after 30 minutes:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd148f0fe-402b-460d-91f4-4039230e3fb6_1140x637.png

It appeared that the PEMF did not increase the yellow hydrogel area. It was possible to disintegrate the clot mechanically, but it had some stringy yellowish features.

One month later, the same experiment was repeated. The same C19 vaccine injured individual was exposed to 3 minutes of PEMF.

This time the pre -PEMF blood already had a yellowish rubbery “hydrogel” zone. However, after 3 minutes of PEMF exposure, the yellowish clot part significantly increased and worsened. Additionally the red blood part changed from normal consistency to a sticky consistency - this was the first time a change to the red blood part was observed. It is not possible to disintegrate the yellowish hydrogel clot mechanically as we have shown in the video embedded in the last article.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc719638f-4f7f-4967-919a-033ed7c52edf_1169x660.png

Summary:

Our before and after blood clotting experiment is a cheap and easy way to quantify treatment improvement or worsening. We will be showing different experiments in subsequent posts.

We did not see immediate worsening of the hydrogel development after 5 G exposure, however on live blood analysis we have consistently seen worsening hydrogel filaments and increased rouleaux formation - hence we still advise extreme caution with any 5G or EMF exposure.

While initially it appeared that the PEMF exposure was helping to break up the clots, a repeated experiment showed worrisome worsening and rapid growth of the hydrogel clot part. Therefore we advise EXTREME CAUTION in exposing C19 vaccinated individuals to pulsed electromagnetic fields for the purpose of disabling the nanotechnology or clots. It may make people worse."

onawah

8th June 2023, 00:19

Activists Halt 5G Tower Installation
JUN 7, 2023
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/activists-halt-5g-tower-installation/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=chdtv

"What does it take to fight back against Big Tech giants with power over our school boards, city commissions and neighboring homeowners? These three ‘Good Morning CHD’ guests have boldly taken charge in their community and found victory in this ongoing battle. Find out how they are pushing back against unsafe radiofrequency exposure in this episode!

LIVE CHAT
References:

‘Death Sentence For Millions’: WHO, EU Launch New Global Vaccine Passport Initiative

FDA's 'Rumor Control' Hub Encourages Public To 'Snitch' On 'Misinformation Spreaders'

Rumor Control - FDA U.S. Food & Drug Administration

Faster Rollout Of Wireless Infrastructure Serves Industry Not U.S. Citizens, Experts Say

Manatee County - Municode Library

The European Commission And Who Launch Landmark Digital Health Initiative To Strengthen Global Health Security | Press Release

The European Commission And Who Launch Landmark Digital Health Initiative To Strengthen Global Health Security

‘Historic Win’: CHD Wins Case Against FCC On Safety Guidelines For 5G And Wireless

Manatee Commissioner: Locate Cell Tower At Premier Sports

Manatee County Commission Oks Developments, Rejects Proposed Cell Tower

County To Debate Towers On Public Land | Your Observer

The Electrifying Factor Affecting Your Property's Value

A Cell Phone Tower Is Coming To Lakewood Ranch. It’ll Look Like A Tree, Developers Say

Manatee Commissioner: Locate Cell Tower At Premier Sports

A Cell Phone Tower Is Coming To Lakewood Ranch. It’ll Look Like A Tree, Developers Say

Take Action Campaigns - CHD

Sign The Petition - Neighbors Against The Cell Phone Tower

Available in these languages:
English
Spanish
German
French
Italian
Portuguese "

PlasmaVortex

15th June 2023, 12:38

My mother died of blood cancer two years ago I'm starting to wonder if this technology is to blame, I appreciate all the work you do on the forum John and everyone else I will be making a pledge to donate monthly.

ExomatrixTV

17th June 2023, 09:39

San Fran Exodus: AT&T Closing Flagship Store, Citing 'Changing Consumer Habits' (https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/san-fran-exodus-att-closing-flagship-store-citing-changing-consumer-habits)

ExomatrixTV

22nd June 2023, 23:04

Tanja Rebel (https://www.facebook.com/groups/548912049259423/) Stop5G Interview:

-WE-A8BFEOY

facebook.com/groups/Stop5G :dog: (https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g)
facebook.com/groups/548912049259423 (https://www.facebook.com/groups/548912049259423/) (Tanja Rebel Global Stop5G Fb Group)

ExomatrixTV

7th July 2023, 10:17

E.M.F. The Other Pandemic (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?121463-E.M.F.-The-Other-Pandemic) :dog:

ExomatrixTV

7th July 2023, 10:29

American Airlines pilot warns 5G rollout on planes 'is just crazy' (https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/american-airlines-pilot-warns-5g-rollout-planes-crazy)

onawah

31st July 2023, 00:06

5G in Israel
JUL 26, 2023
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/5g-in-israel/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=chdtv

(Video at the link and hyperlinks not embedded here. The video (over 90 minutes long) begins with a brief interview and report about a baby killed by vaccines, but the rest is about 5G.)

" "A lot of lies, a lot of fake science, a lot of harm is being caused to the people and our children.” Today, Ilana Rachel Daniel and her guest discuss new technologies and whether enough safety data exists to justify their rollout. Tune in to ‘The Jerusalem Report’ to hear the in-depth, timely conversation."[B]

References (hyperlinks for them at the link):

Cellcom 3G / 4G / 5G Coverage Map, Israel | NPerf.Com

5G Apocalypse: The Extinction Event – Film By Sacha Stone

Israel Uses 5G To Innovate Digital Health

Shai Danon | Lawsuit Against 5G Filled To The Supreme Court Of Israel

Shai-Danon And Cindy Niles Discuss The Urgent Need To Undo Smart City Infrastructure Installations

KosherCell | Browser Free Phones And Devices

The Secret Intelligence Of Water

Ultra-Orthodox Jews In Israel Avoid Using Technological Devices In Daily Life

UTJ Deal Set To Reverse Phase Out Of 2G, 3G Networks; Officials Slam Retrograde Step

The Second Chance Of The Fifth Generation

Israel Targets ‘Smart’ Cities With New 5G Mobile Auction

Israel Calls For 5G Tech Pilots To Promote Next-Gen Network Deployment

Israel Launches Inter-Ministerial Panel For Nationwide 5G Implementation

Israel’s Binary Fallacy In The Us-China Rivalry - Opinion

UK To Remove Chinese Surveillance Cameras From Sensitive Government Sites As Beijing Hits Back

Israeli Minister Warns As US Presses On China Ties: We Are In A Cold War

Three Million 5G Base Stations Built Worldwide, As 5G Development Enters Fast Lane: Industry Forum

ExomatrixTV

14th August 2023, 13:21

Bristol 5G Radiation Readings:

@LSB_FILM_PRODUCTIONS:4/bristol-5g-radiation-readings:c?r=35xtShSNdDmnZrxKQPRWLSWTkyAfweTF
Founding member of the National Residents Association, Cassie Langford took to the streets in Bristol, where she and her companion measured the levels of radiation being omitted from the surrounding 5G masts.

nationalresidentsassociation.co.uk (https://www.nationalresidentsassociation.co.uk)

ehmfEXTDUvo

ExomatrixTV

14th August 2023, 14:20

@CarterHeavyIndustries:6/5g-penta-gram-radiation-poisoning:2?r=35xtShSNdDmnZrxKQPRWLSWTkyAfweTF

ExomatrixTV

2nd September 2023, 18:18

There are many points that this lady makes that "sounds ridiculous", but me being the founder of #Stop5G Fb Group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/Stop5G) in 2017 with 10,000s of hours of research in to EMFs, DEW, Erratic Pulsed Microwaves, Smartphones, 8x8 Phased Array Beamforming Antenna’s, Smart Meters connected to mass burning houses in California etc. all CAN be weaponized! ... Everything she says was already known to me, but I got called: "crazy" or "spreading fear porn (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-&p=1446016&viewfull=1#post1446016)" etc. etc. many times, meanwhile, everything she says can save millions of lives ONLY if people decide to educate themselves about it. To trigger that, SOMEONE has to explain why it is important!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
v3b1opm/?pub=1hi16y

ExomatrixTV

11th September 2023, 19:53

1386455255237439

source (https://www.facebook.com/reel/1386455255237439)

norman

14th September 2023, 12:42

5G REMOTE KILL VECTOR: Science paper reveals cell phone signals can activate the release of biological PAYLOADS from graphene oxide injected into the body
09/14/2023 // Mike Adams

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-14-remote-kill-science-paper-reveals-cell-phone-signals-release-biological-payloads-graphene-oxide.html

https://www.naturalnews.com/images/Wireless-On-Demand-Drug-Release-600.jpg

A science paper published in MaterialsToday Chemistry reveals that cell phone signals can be used to release biological or chemical payloads from graphene oxide that's introduced into the human body. The paper, published in September of 2022, is entitled, "Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery."
The study abstract reveals how a cell phone can emit signals to activate a low voltage current that interacts with Graphene Oxide (GO) molecules, causing efficient delivery of drug payloads:

This study aims to determine low-voltage-controlled dual drug (aspirin and doxorubicin) release from GO surface. Here, we have demonstrated how to control the drug release rate remotely with a handy mobile phone, with zero passive release at idle time.

Because of its extremely high surface area and complex structure composition, graphene oxide turns out to be the perfect molecule for delivery of biological or drug payloads inside the body. From the study:

These advantages make GO an extremely potential nanocomposite material as a drug carrier in the field of biomedicine and biotechnology, while being combined with a polymer or inorganic matrix.

Continue reading . . . . (https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-14-remote-kill-science-paper-reveals-cell-phone-signals-release-biological-payloads-graphene-oxide.html)

ExomatrixTV

15th September 2023, 00:28

5G REMOTE KILL VECTOR: Science paper reveals cell phone signals can activate the release of biological PAYLOADS from graphene oxide injected into the body

09/14/2023 // Mike Adams (https://www.naturalnews.com/author/healthranger)

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/91/2023/09/Cell-Phone-Signals-Human-Body-Molecules.jpg

A science paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468519422002166) published in MaterialsToday Chemistry reveals that cell phone signals can be used to release biological or chemical payloads from graphene oxide that's introduced into the human body. The paper, published in September of 2022, is entitled, "Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery."

The study abstract reveals how a cell phone can emit signals to activate a low voltage current that interacts with Graphene Oxide (GO) molecules, causing efficient delivery of drug payloads:

This study aims to determine low-voltage-controlled dual drug (aspirin and doxorubicin) release from GO surface. Here, we have demonstrated how to control the drug release rate remotely with a handy mobile phone, with zero passive release at idle time.

Because of its extremely high surface area and complex structure composition, graphene oxide turns out to be the perfect molecule for delivery of biological or drug payloads inside the body. From the study:

These advantages make GO an extremely potential nanocomposite material as a drug carrier in the field of biomedicine and biotechnology, while being combined with a polymer or inorganic matrix.

https://www.naturalnews.com/images/Wireless-On-Demand-Drug-Release-600.jpg

Importantly, the presence of a specific frequency of a low voltage current is all that's necessary to cause graphene oxide to release its payload.

5G cell tower signals create micro currents inside the body

We already know that 5G signals can generate electrical currents inside the human body, even from a significant distance. An important article (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-emf-radiofrequency-radiation-health-risks-exposure-humans-cola/) authored by Dr. Joseph Mercola and published in Childrens Health Defense reveals that 5G cell signal radiation results in measurable biological and chemical changes inside the human body. From his article:

5G relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimeter wave, known to cause a painful burning sensation. It’s also been linked to eye and heart problems, suppressed immune function, genetic damage and fertility problems.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) admits no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or telecom industry, and that none are planned.
The FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it.
Persistent exposures to microwave frequencies like those from cellphones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals produced from peroxynitrite.
Excessive exposures to cellphones and Wi-Fi networks have been linked to chronic diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility.

The Cellular Phone Task Force website (http://cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless-technology/) lists numerous warnings from governments and agencies around the world who have sounded the alarm on cell phone radiation and its harmful effects on human biology.

Radiofrequency microwave radiation causes voltage changes inside the body's cells, altering calcium channels

Additionally, compelling research led by Martin Pall, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, reveals that microwave radiation from mobile devices and wireless routers causes voltage changes inside the body's cells, activating what are called "Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels" (VGCCs), which are located in the outer membrane of your cells. It is this membrane that determines what passes into and out of the cell.

See the full study by Martin Pall, PhD., entitled: Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23802593/). That study explains:

Twenty-three studies have shown that voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) produce these and other EMF effects... Furthermore, the voltage-gated properties of these channels may provide biophysically plausible mechanisms for EMF biological effects.

From Dr. Mercola's article linked above: (emphasis added)

According to Pall’s research radiofrequency microwave radiation such as that from your cellphone and wireless router activates the voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) located in the outer membrane of your cells.

According to Pall, VGCCs are 7.2 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation than the charged particles inside and outside our cells, which means the safety standards for this exposure are off by a factor of 7.2 million.

Low-frequency microwave radiation opens your VGCCs, thereby allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions into the cell, which in turn activates nitric oxide and superoxide which react nearly instantaneously to form peroxynitrite that then causes carbonate free radicals, which are one of the most damaging reactive nitrogen species known and thought to be a root cause for many of today’s chronic diseases.

This means that cell phone radiation (and 5G cell tower radiation) does, indeed, induce voltage changes in the human body, and that these voltage changes have very real biochemical effects, some of which may be dangerous to human health (such as the formation of peroxynitrite molecules).

Fighting these potent free radicals can be achieved in part with nutritional approaches, such as through the use of superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD), which is the foundational nutrient in the Health Ranger Store's 5G Defense powders (https://www.healthrangerstore.com/collections/5g-defense-powder). Notably, SOD (which is usually derived from melon fruit) does not block cell tower radiation itself, but it helps the body respond to cellular stresses such as the formation of peroxynitrite molecules.

In related news reported by Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/technology/french-watchdog-halts-iphone-12-sales-over-too-high-radiation-minister-2023-09-12/), French regulators have issued a warning to Apple to stop selling iPhone 12 phones due to the presence of excessive radiation produced by the devices. Apple's smartphone exceeds the allowable legal limit of radiation. This phone has been sold since 2020.

5G signals may be used to cause Graphene Oxide to release payloads inside the human body

Connecting the dots on all this, 5G signals can be used to generate low voltage inside the human body, causing Graphene Oxide molecules to release predetermined payloads inside the body. Via the published paper linked above:

Upon application of external stimuli, many materials are able to release drugs. However, most of them need sophisticated instruments except electrical stimulation. Electro-stimulated drug delivery has attracted attention due to the low expense, painless, and portability of the control equipment, making it manageable for customized applications. In this study, we used NGO as an electro-sensitive material to deliver drugs in a controllable manner.

"This is the first time we have used ASP and DOX as a model drug which can be delivered simultaneously by external voltage," the paper states. The conclusion of the paper adds: (emphasis added)

In conclusion, we have shown here that NGO can be used as a dual drug delivery agent, and the release of drugs can be controlled by an external voltage. To exploit the synergistic effect of ASP and DOX, we modified NGO and attached two drugs to it. Our labmade remote-controlled device efficiently released the anticancer drug. The releasing process can easily be switched on and off with a mobile phone by changing the bias voltage.

https://www.naturalnews.com/images/Human-Body-Cell-Phone-Signals-Molecules-550.jpg

Graphene Oxide can carry biological or chemical weapons as payloads

In the scientific paper quoted above, the payload was aspirin plus a common cancer drug. However, payloads can be almost anything of sufficiently small size, including both hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules. From the study, "We have also demonstrated how hydrophilic (ASP) and hydrophobic drugs (DOX) can be delivered by using a single delivery platform."

This means that potent chemical weapons -- theoretically including nerve agents that are fatal at nanograms of exposure -- could be loaded into graphene oxide molecules which are surreptitiously delivered into the body via aggressively propagandized medical interventions such as fake vaccines or covid swabs. Theoretically, such weapons might be able to be delivered to the population via food vectors as well. Once in the body, a small amount of payload leakage may generate some level of nerve damage among inoculated victims, but the real payload delivery won't happen until a proper 5G signal is broadcast across the inoculated population, using the "release frequency" that generates the required voltage to unleash the payload.

In other words, a 5G broadcast signal at the appropriate frequency could instantly cause graphene oxide molecules to release the payloads into the bodies of those who were previously inoculated with those payloads. This would happen simultaneously, across the entire population that is within range of the broadcast frequencies which generate the necessary voltage in the body.

If the payload were a nerve agent, the real world effect would be the sudden dropping dead of large portions of populations across cities where 5G broadcast are able to saturate them. If payloads were virus-like nanoparticles, payload delivery could cause a large portion of the population to suddenly appear to be "infected" with a pandemic virus that is spreading at unimaginable speed.

This technology, in other words, could be used as a "kill switch" to terminate whatever portion of the population was previously inoculated with payload-carrying GO.

"Black ink" printed on pharmaceutical capsules shown to be magnetic and may contain graphene oxide

Some additional information came to my attention during the writing of this article. The black ink printed on the side of pharmaceutical capsules actually consists of mysterious black specks which are magnetic. A contact sent me a video, represented in the following screen shot, showing pharmaceutical capsules soaked in water for several hours, after which the black "ink" from the capsules turned into black specs that displayed startling magnetic properties. In this still photo, you can see the black specs gather at the common magnet held against the glass:

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/drug-capsules-black-ink-magnetic.png

As this article reveals in LiveScience.com (https://www.livescience.com/graphene-hides-rare-magnetism.html), stunning new research finds that graphene can be made magnetic by assembling layers in a specific rotational orientation. This gives rise to magnetism, even though the underlying atomic elements are nothing but carbon. From the article:

The magnetic field isn't created by the usual spin of electrons within the individual graphene layers, but instead arises from the collective swirling of electrons in all of the three-layers of the stacked graphene structure, researchers reported Oct. 12 in the journal Nature Physics.

Is graphene being used in the "ink" that's printed on the side of prescription medications? We don't know for certain, but the fact that this ink is clearly magnetic is alarming.

Graphene oxide can also transmit gigahertz signals to nearby receivers

Additionally, under certain exotic applications of graphic oxide (GO) materials, those whose bodies are activated by cell tower broadcast could themselves function as electromagnetic "repeaters" due to the ability of GO to function as transmitters.

This capability is well documented in a study entitled, "Radio-frequency characteristics of graphene oxide," published in Applied Physics Letters in 2010. (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3506468) That study explains: (emphasis added)

We confirm graphene oxide, a two-dimensional carbon structure at the nanoscale level can be a strong candidate for high-efficient interconnector
in radio-frequency range. In this paper, we investigate high frequency characteristics of graphene oxide in range of 0.5–40 GHz. Radiofrequency transmission properties were extracted as S-parameters to determine the intrinsic ac transmission of graphene sheets, such as the impedance variation dependence on frequency. The impedance and resistance of graphene sheets drastically decrease as frequency increases. This result confirms graphene oxide has high potential for transmitting signals at gigahertz ranges.

Graphene oxide materials, in other words, can both carry payloads which are delivered via remote cell phone signaling, as well as transmit signals to other nearby receivers.

This could theoretically be used to start a "chain reaction" of 5G cell tower signals being re-broadcast from one person to another. In theory, this could extend a "kill switch" signal broadcast far beyond the initial range of 5G cell towers themselves.

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/graphene-oxide-transmission.png

From the conclusion of that published paper:

...[W]e expect that GO could be used for transmission lines in next-stage electronics and could be very strong candidate for nanocarbon electronics.

Conclusions

Graphene oxide can carry chemical or biological payloads.
Graphene oxide carrying payloads can be introduced into the body through vaccines or swabs.
The release of those payloads can be controlled by external cell tower signals which cause specific voltage changes in human cells.
Some voltage changes are already known to occur with exposure to cell tower radiation, especially with 5G.
Graphene oxide payloads can include "kill switch" payloads such as nerve agents or infectious agents.
The 5G tower system can therefore function as a chemical weapons payload release infrastructure system to achieve a "mass kill" of populations which were previously inoculated with payload-carrying GO.
Covid vaccines -- which are now widely known to have had nothing to do with halting any pandemic (since even the White House and CDC both admit they do not halt transmission or infections) -- could have theoretically been used to inoculate people with graphene oxide payloads which have not yet been activated.

Thus, it is plausible -- but not proven -- that vaccines + 5G cell towers could be exploited as a depopulation weapon system to achieve near-simultaneous mass extermination of a large percentage of the human population, simply by activating GO payload release with a specific broadcast energy intensity and frequency.

Given that the western governments of the world are clearly attempting to exterminate their own populations right now, this conclusion should be concerning to all those who wish to survive the global depopulation agenda (https://depopulation.news).

Sources cited in this article include:

childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-emf-radiofrequency-radiation-health-risks-exposure-humans-cola (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-emf-radiofrequency-radiation-health-risks-exposure-humans-cola/)
sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468519422002166 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468519422002166)
reuters.com/technology/french-watchdog-halts-iphone-12-sales-over-too-high-radiation-minister-2023-09-12 (https://www.reuters.com/technology/french-watchdog-halts-iphone-12-sales-over-too-high-radiation-minister-2023-09-12/)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23802593 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23802593/)
cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless-technology (http://cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless-technology/)
pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-abstract/97/19/193103/324025/Radio-frequency-characteristics-of-graphene-oxide?redirectedFrom=fulltext (https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-abstract/97/19/193103/324025/Radio-frequency-characteristics-of-graphene-oxide?redirectedFrom=fulltext)

https://www.naturalnews.com/WP-Content/Uploads/Bio-Mike-Adams.jpg
About Mike Adams:

See real-time updates from the Health Ranger on Brighteon.social (https://brighteon.social/@healthranger)

Mike Adams (aka the "Health Ranger (http://www.healthranger.com)") is the founding editor of NaturalNews.com, a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com called "Food Forensics (http://foodforensics.com)"), an environmental scientist, a patent holder for a cesium radioactive isotope elimination invention, a multiple award winner for outstanding journalism, a science news publisher and influential commentator on topics ranging from science and medicine to culture and politics.

Mike Adams also serves as the lab science director of an internationally accredited (ISO 17025) analytical laboratory known as CWC Labs (http://cwclabs.com). There, he was awarded a Certificate of Excellence (https://www.naturalnews.com/053735_CWC_Labs_Health_Ranger_certificate_of_excellence.html) for achieving extremely high accuracy in the analysis of toxic elements in unknown water samples using ICP-MS instrumentation.

In his laboratory research, Adams has made numerous food safety breakthroughs such as revealing rice protein products imported from Asia to be contaminated with toxic heavy metals like lead, cadmium and tungsten (https://www.naturalnews.com/043838_rice_protein_heavy_metals_data_charts.html). Adams was the first food science researcher to document high levels of tungsten in superfoods (https://www.naturalnews.com/043808_rice_protein_heavy_metals_NN_standard.html). He also discovered over 11 ppm lead in imported mangosteen powder (https://www.naturalnews.com/044540_mangosteen_powder_heavy_metals_lead_contamination.html), and led an industry-wide voluntary agreement (https://www.naturalnews.com/043792_rice_protein_heavy_metals_industry_agreement.html) to limit heavy metals in rice protein products.

Adams has also helped defend the rights of home gardeners (https://www.naturalnews.com/032960_Julie_Bass_home_gardening.html) and protect the medical freedom rights of parents (https://www.naturalnews.com/032090_Maryanne_Godboldo_health_freedom.html). Adams is widely recognized to have made a remarkable global impact on issues like GMOs, vaccines, nutrition therapies, human consciousness.

source (https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-14-remote-kill-science-paper-reveals-cell-phone-signals-release-biological-payloads-graphene-oxide.html)