PDA

View Full Version : PathWalker interview with Kerry Cassidy 2017-nov-15: Spiritual reality, souls, polarity, evolution...



PathWalker
16th November 2017, 13:06
Greetings All,

I wish to share an interview I did with Kerry Cassidy today.

The discussion is about spiritual matters and subjects only. We did not discuss matters/events/conspiracies of the world.

The goal of the interview was to explore the lore of souls and its relevance to our life.
As always, it turned out something else: Kerry's spiritual philosophy and interpretation of reality.

I approached Kerry because I admire her character and approach to life.
I find her to be very spiritual and her conduct is 100% aligned/connected. I regard her, to walks her talk 90%-100% of the time (me less).

The topic covered: souls, evolution, spiritual conduct, polarity, contentedness, discernment, individual path, spiritual teachings, reincarnation, source/creator/oneness and more.

The outcome surpassed the expectation.

Here are some reflection I had:
1. There is abundance of spiritual teaching and teaching references in the interview.
2. Kerry view the 3rd dimension as battle ground of polarity (I view it is as a virtual game of construction and interactions - think of Sims (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sims)/Second life (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Life)/Lego/Playmobil)
3. Kerry is very connected to her higher self, and draw her information/wisdom from within.
4. Kerry believes the way to progress spiritually is by trial and error through endless reincarnations (I do not hold to this belief).
5. The answer about earth as a prison planet, was not conclusive.
6. I endorse the idea of false ascension to other dimension, sorry she did not explain the growth through service.

Please post your reflection as well.

I wanted the interview to evolve around souls and their mechanics, please reflect on that as well.

Thanks
Joy and happiness
PathWalker

ksz26Wd1fhU

Foxie Loxie
16th November 2017, 18:15
Thank you, Pathwalker, for sharing this with us. It IS helpful to listen to Kerry's conclusions from the spiritual perspective as she has had a most unusual life, as has our Bill. Can't wait to hear Bill's Part 2 Interview!! :sun:

Cardillac
16th November 2017, 22:16
I just think that NONE of us due to our puny/extremely limited 3-D conscious minds (research David Icke on this topic) can understand the reason for our existence-

Larry

Michelle Marie
17th November 2017, 00:22
The inner world is deep and illuminating. Nobody can go there for another. One cannot limit other people's experiences, either, by their own perspective.

Kerry shares great understanding that I totally resonate with. I've also studied the Bhagavad Gita and practice meditation.

States of consciousness are developed by specific practices, although there are many paths. There are different levels of development for the intelligence. Perceptive abilities increase with certain practices.

Belief systems, that are decisions based on speculation mixed with accepted perspectives, eventually get discarded for attunement to truth. James Gilliland called them be-lie-f systems, highlighting the lie in the middle.

Receptivity is a big factor in expanding awareness. The walls of limitation and non-acceptance of change dissolve to allow new information to be discerned rather than dismissing it offhand. It is quite fascinating and rewarding.

It's a process of evolution, that's for sure!

⚡️💜⚡️💙⚡️
MM

Very valuable interview. Thank you, Pathwalker.

Sunny-side-up
17th November 2017, 16:38
I just think that NONE of us due to our puny/extremely limited 3-D conscious minds (research David Icke on this topic) can understand the reason for our existence-

Larry

Ill second that for sure.
:wizard:

Kano
17th November 2017, 18:20
I just think that NONE of us due to our puny/extremely limited 3-D conscious minds (research David Icke on this topic) can understand the reason for our existence-

Larry

If you're saying it's a matter of our minds not have the conceptual capacity to understand the nature of our existence, where we come from/why we are here, etc., I disagree.

If we were told the end all be all truth, we would have no problems connecting the dots and consuming a new domain of "knowing" about the human condition.