The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI

[turiya]

MIT
Technology
Review
________________
Intelligent Machines

The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/?curator=TechREDEF)




No one really knows how the most advanced algorithms
do what they do. That could be a problem.


by Will Knight (https://www.technologyreview.com/profile/will-knight/)
April 11, 2017
Last year, a strange self-driving car was released onto the quiet roads of Monmouth County, New Jersey. The experimental vehicle, developed by researchers at the chip maker Nvidia, didn’t look different from other autonomous cars, but it was unlike anything demonstrated by Google, Tesla, or General Motors, and it showed the rising power of artificial intelligence. The car didn’t follow a single instruction provided by an engineer or programmer. Instead, it relied entirely on an algorithm that had taught itself to drive by watching a human do it.

Getting a car to drive this way was an impressive feat. But it’s also a bit unsettling, since it isn’t completely clear how the car makes its decisions. Information from the vehicle’s sensors goes straight into a huge network of artificial neurons that process the data and then deliver the commands required to operate the steering wheel, the brakes, and other systems. The result seems to match the responses you’d expect from a human driver. But what if one day it did something unexpected—crashed into a tree, or sat at a green light? As things stand now, it might be difficult to find out why. The system is so complicated that even the engineers who designed it may struggle to isolate the reason for any single action. And you can’t ask it: there is no obvious way to design such a system so that it could always explain why it did what it did.

The mysterious mind of this vehicle points to a looming issue with artificial intelligence. The car’s underlying AI technology, known as deep learning, has proved very powerful at solving problems in recent years, and it has been widely deployed for tasks like image captioning, voice recognition, and language translation. There is now hope that the same techniques will be able to diagnose deadly diseases, make million-dollar trading decisions, and do countless other things to transform whole industries.

But this won’t happen—or shouldn’t happen—unless we find ways of making techniques like deep learning more understandable to their creators and accountable to their users. Otherwise it will be hard to predict when failures might occur—and it’s inevitable they will. That’s one reason Nvidia’s car is still experimental.

Already, mathematical models are being used to help determine who makes parole, who’s approved for a loan, and who gets hired for a job. If you could get access to these mathematical models, it would be possible to understand their reasoning. But banks, the military, employers, and others are now turning their attention to more complex machine-learning approaches that could make automated decision-making altogether inscrutable. Deep learning, the most common of these approaches, represents a fundamentally different way to program computers. “It is a problem that is already relevant, and it’s going to be much more relevant in the future,” says Tommi Jaakkola, a professor at MIT who works on applications of machine learning. “Whether it’s an investment decision, a medical decision, or maybe a military decision, you don’t want to just rely on a ‘black box’ method.”

There’s already an argument that being able to interrogate an AI system about how it reached its conclusions is a fundamental legal right. Starting in the summer of 2018, the European Union may require that companies be able to give users an explanation for decisions that automated systems reach. This might be impossible, even for systems that seem relatively simple on the surface, such as the apps and websites that use deep learning to serve ads or recommend songs. The computers that run those services have programmed themselves, and they have done it in ways we cannot understand. Even the engineers who build these apps cannot fully explain their behavior.

This raises mind-boggling questions. As the technology advances, we might soon cross some threshold beyond which using AI requires a leap of faith. Sure, we humans can’t always truly explain our thought processes either—but we find ways to intuitively trust and gauge people. Will that also be possible with machines that think and make decisions differently from the way a human would? We’ve never before built machines that operate in ways their creators don’t understand. How well can we expect to communicate—and get along with—intelligent machines that could be unpredictable and inscrutable? These questions took me on a journey to the bleeding edge of research on AI algorithms, from Google to Apple and many places in between, including a meeting with one of the great philosophers of our time.
http://techtly.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/7-14DarkAISecret-2.jpg
The artist Adam Ferriss created this image, and the one below, using Google Deep Dream, a program
that adjusts an image to stimulate the pattern recognition capabilities of a deep neural network. The
pictures were produced using a mid-level layer of the neural network --Adam FerrissIn 2015, a research group at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York was inspired to apply deep learning to the hospital’s vast database of patient records. This data set features hundreds of variables on patients, drawn from their test results, doctor visits, and so on. The resulting program, which the researchers named Deep Patient, was trained using data from about 700,000 individuals, and when tested on new records, it proved incredibly good at predicting disease. Without any expert instruction, Deep Patient had discovered patterns hidden in the hospital data that seemed to indicate when people were on the way to a wide range of ailments, including cancer of the liver. There are a lot of methods that are “pretty good” at predicting disease from a patient’s records, says Joel Dudley, who leads the Mount Sinai team. But, he adds, “this was just way better.”



“We can build these models,
but we don’t know how they work.”
At the same time, Deep Patient is a bit puzzling. It appears to anticipate the onset of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia surprisingly well. But since schizophrenia is notoriously difficult for physicians to predict, Dudley wondered how this was possible. He still doesn’t know. The new tool offers no clue as to how it does this. If something like Deep Patient is actually going to help doctors, it will ideally give them the rationale for its prediction, to reassure them that it is accurate and to justify, say, a change in the drugs someone is being prescribed. “We can build these models,” Dudley says ruefully, “but we don’t know how they work.”

Artificial intelligence hasn’t always been this way. From the outset, there were two schools of thought regarding how understandable, or explainable, AI ought to be. Many thought it made the most sense to build machines that reasoned according to rules and logic, making their inner workings transparent to anyone who cared to examine some code. Others felt that intelligence would more easily emerge if machines took inspiration from biology, and learned by observing and experiencing. This meant turning computer programming on its head. Instead of a programmer writing the commands to solve a problem, the program generates its own algorithm based on example data and a desired output. The machine-learning techniques that would later evolve into today’s most powerful AI systems followed the latter path: the machine essentially programs itself.

At first this approach was of limited practical use, and in the 1960s and ’70s it remained largely confined to the fringes of the field. Then the computerization of many industries and the emergence of large data sets renewed interest. That inspired the development of more powerful machine-learning techniques, especially new versions of one known as the artificial neural network. By the 1990s, neural networks could automatically digitize handwritten characters (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/540001/teaching-machines-to-understand-us/).

But it was not until the start of this decade, after several clever tweaks and refinements, that very large—or “deep”—neural networks demonstrated dramatic improvements in automated perception. Deep learning is responsible for today’s explosion of AI. It has given computers extraordinary powers, like the ability to recognize spoken words almost as well as a person could, a skill too complex to code into the machine by hand. Deep learning has transformed computer vision and dramatically improved machine translation. It is now being used to guide all sorts of key decisions in medicine, finance, manufacturing—and beyond.
https://www.digitalartsonline.co.uk/cmsdata/features/3623636/deepdream-top.jpg
Adam Ferriss
Cornell's artificial neural network
through Deep Dream by Ferriss
(Nov 23, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHvEM1etCt8The workings of any machine-learning technology are inherently more opaque, even to computer scientists, than a hand-coded system. This is not to say that all future AI techniques will be equally unknowable. But by its nature, deep learning is a particularly dark black box.

You can’t just look inside a deep neural network to see how it works. A network’s reasoning is embedded in the behavior of thousands of simulated neurons, arranged into dozens or even hundreds of intricately interconnected layers. The neurons in the first layer each receive an input, like the intensity of a pixel in an image, and then perform a calculation before outputting a new signal. These outputs are fed, in a complex web, to the neurons in the next layer, and so on, until an overall output is produced. Plus, there is a process known as back-propagation that tweaks the calculations of individual neurons in a way that lets the network learn to produce a desired output.

The many layers in a deep network enable it to recognize things at different levels of abstraction. In a system designed to recognize dogs, for instance, the lower layers recognize simple things like outlines or color; higher layers recognize more complex stuff like fur or eyes; and the topmost layer identifies it all as a dog. The same approach can be applied, roughly speaking, to other inputs that lead a machine to teach itself: the sounds that make up words in speech, the letters and words that create sentences in text, or the steering-wheel movements required for driving.



“It might be part of the nature of intelligence that only part of it is exposed to rational explanation. Some of it is just instinctual.”
Ingenious strategies have been used to try to capture and thus explain in more detail what’s happening in such systems. In 2015, researchers at Google modified a deep-learning-based image recognition algorithm so that instead of spotting objects in photos, it would generate or modify them. By effectively running the algorithm in reverse, they could discover the features the program uses to recognize, say, a bird or building. The resulting images (https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipPX0SCl7OzWilt9LnuQliattX4OUCj_8EP65_cTVnBmS1 jnYgsGQAieQUc1VQWdgQ?key=aVBxWjhwSzg2RjJWLWRuVFBBZ EN1d205bUdEMnhB), produced by a project known as Deep Dream, showed grotesque, alien-like animals emerging from clouds and plants, and hallucinatory pagodas blooming across forests and mountain ranges.


https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/srhD6h0iS1f2pxb6FlL5FTRcHwowL29c2RRpxoh5kUMnP-hiLxJnq4jWY8s8mYVdMpKWGbb9-6ZBKWEU60ol_iip0AHVYbYP9qb68TYRvIbNO3kGJqgtgnodp7I 1x6hIZbpnzMCaY9K1_2vBnSNQkFKf6tcXfRn3J4e7N0lBcJruq GFmUqFux1aWJ-yoVABHyplen1CakWOh7bNM-IUoB44GSrFWEtGBIyPY9Map2qt8FmmAcMPDG-Lve3_JmrxCJLBlm0uDbRu3u6PKHeJLsWC0qr2LWNEwDIewaLY0 Pne0XcmdVUn9rf8Z5kSs8fb4UuvDoJZ29OhkQB6Cn3uuxc0wnj eoJZoCyuC4N7YMt9bWxFBkOKK4twepPzuqXYcT3A3IrLry1nxQ ESgtCAVBeBLWRuBa0ApdYNzucnV99qgG2fU-wy5gvYr6zuR4Oefq6nnV1fwHJYicENwMhRNo_sivVb4Pkp9l4j 6suhG0lskk7lhIJCKTy8IzpDC6b86WatSxRRXhc99msxcYznKA tTISPsprQg7EKAXnfqWS_kZE4V3rKmd4Pn7KA2k2zTtJb8KXCa L0wvz9c5dV4fvu4CG2irR2_tu4BJJyQGEw3K3lY9sBLCg2VkNR mSxtlG3WUAaqf84wQYgW0U41HYGsYRknFeq_JR8sO-c=w716-h448-no

The images proved that deep learning need not be entirely inscrutable; they revealed that the algorithms home in on familiar visual features like a bird’s beak or feathers. But the images also hinted at how different deep learning is from human perception, in that it might make something out of an artifact that we would know to ignore. Google researchers noted that when its algorithm generated images of a dumbbell, it also generated a human arm holding it. The machine had concluded that an arm was part of the thing.

Further progress has been made using ideas borrowed from neuroscience and cognitive science. A team led by Jeff Clune, an assistant professor at the University of Wyoming, has employed the AI equivalent of optical illusions to test deep neural networks. In 2015, Clune’s group showed how certain images could fool such a network into perceiving things that aren’t there, because the images exploit the low-level patterns the system searches for. One of Clune’s collaborators, Jason Yosinski, also built a tool that acts like a probe stuck into a brain. His tool targets any neuron in the middle of the network and searches for the image that activates it the most. The images that turn up are abstract (imagine an impressionistic take on a flamingo or a school bus), highlighting the mysterious nature of the machine’s perceptual abilities.
https://media-exp2.licdn.com/media-proxy/ext?w=800&h=800&hash=41U6xkwS0Wl8v0zSj0IwyMuav7I%3D&ora=1%2CaFBCTXdkRmpGL2lvQUFBPQ%2CxAVta9Er0Vinkhwfj w8177yE41y87UNCVordEGXyD3u0qYrdf3XvfMXeeeCiuV8ReHg clAdmLvL5QjPoD5HuIoLpddgi38TkIY27dA4BYBI3iSdF_NQ8
This early artificial neural network, at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory in Buffalo, New York,
circa 1960, processed inputs from light sensors.We need more than a glimpse of AI’s thinking, however, and there is no easy solution. It is the interplay of calculations inside a deep neural network that is crucial to higher-level pattern recognition and complex decision-making, but those calculations are a quagmire of mathematical functions and variables. “If you had a very small neural network, you might be able to understand it,” Jaakkola says. “But once it becomes very large, and it has thousands of units per layer and maybe hundreds of layers, then it becomes quite un-understandable.”

In the office next to Jaakkola is Regina Barzilay, an MIT professor who is determined to apply machine learning to medicine. She was diagnosed with breast cancer a couple of years ago, at age 43. The diagnosis was shocking in itself, but Barzilay was also dismayed that cutting-edge statistical and machine-learning methods were not being used to help with oncological research or to guide patient treatment. She says AI has huge potential to revolutionize medicine, but realizing that potential will mean going beyond just medical records. She envisions using more of the raw data that she says is currently underutilized: “imaging data, pathology data, all this information.”



How well can we get along with
machines that are unpredictable
and inscrutable?After she finished cancer treatment last year, Barzilay and her students began working with doctors at Massachusetts General Hospital to develop a system capable of mining pathology reports to identify patients with specific clinical characteristics that researchers might want to study. However, Barzilay understood that the system would need to explain its reasoning. So, together with Jaakkola and a student, she added a step: the system extracts and highlights snippets of text that are representative of a pattern it has discovered. Barzilay and her students are also developing a deep-learning algorithm capable of finding early signs of breast cancer in mammogram images, and they aim to give this system some ability to explain its reasoning, too. “You really need to have a loop where the machine and the human collaborate,” -Barzilay says.

The U.S. military is pouring billions into projects that will use machine learning to pilot vehicles and aircraft, identify targets, and help analysts sift through huge piles of intelligence data. Here more than anywhere else, even more than in medicine, there is little room for algorithmic mystery, and the Department of Defense has identified explainability as a key stumbling block.

David Gunning, a program manager at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, is overseeing the aptly named Explainable Artificial Intelligence program. A silver-haired veteran of the agency who previously oversaw the DARPA project that eventually led to the creation of Siri, Gunning says automation is creeping into countless areas of the military. Intelligence analysts are testing machine learning as a way of identifying patterns in vast amounts of surveillance data. Many autonomous ground vehicles and aircraft are being developed and tested. But soldiers probably won’t feel comfortable in a robotic tank that doesn’t explain itself to them, and analysts will be reluctant to act on information without some reasoning. “It’s often the nature of these machine-learning systems that they produce a lot of false alarms, so an intel analyst really needs extra help to understand why a recommendation was made,” Gunning says.

This March, DARPA chose 13 projects from academia and industry for funding under Gunning’s program. Some of them could build on work led by Carlos Guestrin, a professor at the University of Washington. He and his colleagues have developed a way for machine-learning systems to provide a rationale for their outputs. Essentially, under this method a computer automatically finds a few examples from a data set and serves them up in a short explanation. A system designed to classify an e-mail message as coming from a terrorist, for example, might use many millions of messages in its training and decision-making. But using the Washington team’s approach, it could highlight certain keywords found in a message. Guestrin’s group has also devised ways for image recognition systems to hint at their reasoning by highlighting the parts of an image that were most significant.

One drawback to this approach and others like it, such as Barzilay’s, is that the explanations provided will always be simplified, meaning some vital information may be lost along the way. “We haven’t achieved the whole dream, which is where AI has a conversation with you, and it is able to explain,” says Guestrin. “We’re a long way from having truly interpretable AI.”

It doesn’t have to be a high-stakes situation like cancer diagnosis or military maneuvers for this to become an issue. Knowing AI’s reasoning is also going to be crucial if the technology is to become a common and useful part of our daily lives. Tom Gruber, who leads the Siri team at Apple, says explainability is a key consideration for his team as it tries to make Siri a smarter and more capable virtual assistant. Gruber wouldn’t discuss specific plans for Siri’s future, but it’s easy to imagine that if you receive a restaurant recommendation from Siri, you’ll want to know what the reasoning was. Ruslan Salakhutdinov, director of AI research at Apple and an associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University, sees explainability as the core of the evolving relationship between humans and intelligent machines. “It’s going to introduce trust,” he says.

Just as many aspects of human behavior are impossible to explain in detail, perhaps it won’t be possible for AI to explain everything it does. “Even if somebody can give you a reasonable-sounding explanation [for his or her actions], it probably is incomplete, and the same could very well be true for AI,” says Clune, of the University of Wyoming. “It might just be part of the nature of intelligence that only part of it is exposed to rational explanation. Some of it is just instinctual, or subconscious, or inscrutable.”

If that’s so, then at some stage we may have to simply trust AI’s judgment or do without using it. Likewise, that judgment will have to incorporate social intelligence. Just as society is built upon a contract of expected behavior, we will need to design AI systems to respect and fit with our social norms. If we are to create robot tanks and other killing machines, it is important that their decision-making be consistent with our ethical judgments.

To probe these metaphysical concepts, I went to Tufts University to meet with Daniel Dennett, a renowned philosopher and cognitive scientist who studies consciousness and the mind. A chapter of Dennett’s latest book, From Bacteria to Bach and Back, an encyclopedic treatise on consciousness, suggests that a natural part of the evolution of intelligence itself is the creation of systems capable of performing tasks their creators do not know how to do. “The question is, what accommodations do we have to make to do this wisely—what standards do we demand of them, and of ourselves?” he tells me in his cluttered office on the university’s idyllic campus.

He also has a word of warning about the quest for explainability. “I think by all means if we’re going to use these things and rely on them, then let’s get as firm a grip on how and why they’re giving us the answers as possible,” he says. But since there may be no perfect answer, we should be as cautious of AI explanations as we are of each other’s—no matter how clever a machine seems. “If it can’t do better than us at explaining what it’s doing,” he says, “then don’t trust it.”

Article Source (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/?curator=TechREDEF)

[turiya]

The Kev Baker Show with Anthony Patch...


Interrogating A.I. with Anthony Patch
(Nov 21, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2aG22vjnqE



@~4:40
Anthony Patch: "But the Lord laughs at the wicked for He knows their day is coming."

Kev Baker: We spoke about Jeff Bezos (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos) and the fact that he is the man behind Amazon. Well, its now public, and its in Business Insider right now that Amazon is launching a secret cloud service (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing) (article (http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-web-services-launches-secret-region-2017-11)) for the CIA.

So that's right folks, Amazon - the people that do all your online shopping - but they've moved into so many other areas now - including Amazon Alexa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Alexa) that home system that records absolutely everything. And here we are now, Tony, sitting & looking at articles where they are joining forces with the CIA to come up with something that they've called Secret Region - an Amazon web-based service for the CIA.

Anthony Patch: DARPA, representing the Defense Department - the government-at-large - puts out what are known as RFPs - A request for proposal (RFP) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_proposal) - DARPA comes up with an idea, a concept. And then they put it out to the public sector to bring their idea to life, so-to-speak, an RFP put out for data acquisition, but in a very secure environment within the super-computing cloud-based systems. And this is what the public sector bid on. Amazon won the bid. It was a $600 million deal.

That was back in 2014. That is something that we've brought up to our up-to-speed audience, but there may be some new folks in the audience, so I kind of retrace our steps a little bit.

But this just demonstrates what we've said before - about companies like Amazon, Google, Facebook & others... including D-Wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems), who have all received multiple millions of dollars from DARPA.

Now, its not all that sinister, in terms of how this takes - its not behind closed doors. As I said, its a public request for proposals - to make a bid, its an open bid system. But you can be guaranteed that Amazon had an edge in the bidding process. Because Amazon itself was founded through an RFP process with DARPA. Just like Facebook, just like Google, they received their seed money - their start-up capital - from DARPA, the American taxpayer.


-----------------

@9:08
Anthony Patch: Folks, you got to understand... This isn't conspiracy theories being bantered around. On the one hand, you can say its a benevolent process - that our intelligence communities are using the high-tech sector for the benefit of protecting us from threats. Okay, I get it. We're speaking the intelligence communities everytime we do our show, Kev, everytime we're on the computer - everything is being monitored - not just us, but everybody. So we know that, there is no such thing as privacy anymore.

So what I am saying to the intelligence community - directly, as we often do on this show - is that we are not your enemy. We're simply saying is that "when you involved the private sector, it should be transparent, it shouln't be hidden. The fact that your seed money for these corporations come from the American taxpayer, it should be transparent for the American taxpayer. I understand about keeping secrets from your enemies, etcetera, etc. But when the process, when the technology, when the intelligence-gathering process is used against people, individually, who are not breaking the law, when surveillance becomes the methodology by which you control people, beyond simply securing them & protecting them, then we step into the arena of fascism. And that when I have a problem with these kinds of surveillance programs. Because our liberties are few that are remaining, and even those are pretty much an illusion at this point."

So, we're just sharing the facts. This comes out in the public media. This is just Business Insider public information. We're just repeating it. So, I would just ask the intelligence community, "Back off. We're not your enemy. We're just repeating the news. We're reporters. And we're certainly not a threat to anyone."

Kev Baker: And, there's something else I find interesting... You've got DARPA, who obviously helped Jeff Bezos get off the ground in the first place, they helped another company as well called D-Wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems), and Jeff Bezos just happens to own D-Wave.

So now, we have a definite connection between the intelligence agencies over in the U.S. and a D-Wave. So again, in my mind, any potential 'white hat' hackers out there who are intending to hit any intelligence services networks - well, I think you're up against it now, because we're looking at quantum encryption (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography) on this part of the cloud, I would imagine.

Anthony Patch: Oh most definitely, because one of the premise for building the quantum computers is to break all forms of encryption (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption), particularly RSA coding (https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(algorithm)), based on Shor's algorithm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm) communications.

So, 2048 & 4096 - both alogrithms - its important to understand that cryptology - secrets / secret communications / quantum encrypted communications - is all of where its at. So I would venture to say that in this article they're talking about secret & top-secret... Look, anything that is beyond top-secret is going to be encrypted in a quantum communication - specifically, a quantum entangled (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_communication#Quantum_entanglement) form of communication. And Kev, we've covered China & all of their processes of quantum communications between ground-based systems & satellite-based systems & point-to-point on-the-ground systems of entangled communications.

What it means, just as a quick review, is that quantum entangled communications cannot be hacked. It requires an identical quantum computer, but even when you do that you collapse the entanglement. And therefore, when you collapse the entanglement, it is detected - it is registered by the parent quantum system. So virtually, the system shuts down, is the way to put it - if there is any attempt to hack it.

So we're really talking about, what I venture to say, the ultimate secure communication & data collection system when it is based on a quantum computer. We're going to relate a little bit later on, some more about quantum computers as they relate to graphics cards, and, how AI has developed. We'll talk about - kind of a low-level AI with graphics cards, then we're going to go to the quantum scale & the more sophisticated, as the show progresses.

Kev Baker: With China taking control of the infrastructure of this actual network that they're building. And if that's the case then, Anthony, I think the listeners should be made aware of just where the heart of the AI is going to come from. Because I think we're now starting to see the location which where all this is going to be based. Interestingly enough, it doesn't come a million miles away from our favorite place - CERN. Because, Switzerland is definitely on the map when it comes to AI, isn't it?

Anthony Patch: It definitely is. Early last week, or the week prior to that, we brought out the Blue Brain Initiative (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Brain_Project) - the Blue Brain Laboratories in Switzerland. And there actually are about six(6) primary neurological research centers in Switzerland right outside of CERN - and that is not by random selection that they've placed themselves there. Because we revealed a couple weeks ago that the large Hadron Collider (https://home.cern/sites/home.web.cern.ch/files/image/update-for_the_public/2013/08/lhc-point-6.jpg) - the Synchotron Collider (https://scontent-frt3-2.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/22794211_125948798117430_6640751491021799424_n.jpg ?ig_cache_key=MTYzMjQ4NjU4NjUyNzg2NjMwMg%3D%3D.2) - operates in a quantum mechanical fashion that is identical to D-Wave's quantum computers, only the scale is different.

I put out, what I believe, is proof that the LAC - the particle collider - actually operates as a quantum computer. And therefore, they have the ty(?), and the ability, to feed that information to these brain-mapping neural-morphic laboratories (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromorphic_engineering) where they're trying to counterfit the human brain. They're actually trying to create artifical neurons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neuron), artificial cubits, artificial brains (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_brain) to counterfit the human brain.

Virtually all of the work that is going on in the United States related to neuralmorphic counterfitting, if you will - the mapping of the brain, and then the reproduction of the structures of the brain - all of that research is being fed to Switzerland - specifically, to Blue Brain [Project]. And that has a direct tie to what is known as the Singularity in the Bitcoin Blockchain environment. And, singularityNET.IO (https://singularitynet.io/) is the website. And we presented that a few days ago. And there is a direct correlation between AI, Blockchain or cryptocurrency, the Singularity, as it relates to this company known as SingularityIO who is really running what is the single clearinghouse software program for all cryptocurrencies.

So that is quick review of what we've already covered. But there is a definate connection between CERN, the Project with a Brain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Brain_Project), AI, cryptocurrency and, just to wrap this up, Kev - cryptocurrency is a blockchain, and as we have presented, is for the purpose of gathering data & raising the I.Q. of AI.

Kev Baker: Absolutely. And now to build onto that information for the weekend, I came across an article. And I want people to really take note - write down this term, because this is something we're going to hear about this more & more, imo. And that is: Artificial Organisms (https://futurism.com/global-collaboration-create-artificial-organisms-live/). This comes from, myself & Anthony's favorite website, futurism.com (https://futurism.com/global-collaboration-create-artificial-organisms-live/). But the headline reads:

A Global Collaboration to Create “Artificial Organisms” Just Went Live (https://futurism.com/global-collaboration-create-artificial-organisms-live/) And it goes on to say that:

The Brain Code
Mindfire, a new foundation with the goal of “decoding the mind” to help develop true artificial intelligence (AI) is launching November 17th in Zurich, Switzerland. Now, Mindfire (https://www.mindfire.global/#intro), they've got their website. And just to give you a taste as to what they're about, I will give a quote:

Mindfire Mission
"It is the aspiration of Mindfire to unite the smartest minds on earth to work together on one of the greatest unsolved challenges of our time – to free the mind code.

The Foundation
The Mindfire foundation is a non-profit organization established with the principle of progressing AI openly, responsibly and ethically. In short, to use the power of human level AI to solve our most pressing global challenges.

How to achieve our goal
We sincerely believe that what is needed to decode the human mind is already out there. It is a matter of bringing together the brightest minds – which we call talents - and to inspire them to realize their full potential, in a completely new environment, with the right incentives and support.

For that reason, we have organized a series of Missions that will tackle different topics, in accordance with timelines proposed by our scientific advisory board. The very first Mission will happen in Davos, starting May 12th, when 100 talents will unite their cognitive power for 9 days, and kick-off the journey to free the mind code. Now Anthony, we kind of went back & forth when I found this article. So let's get your thoughts on what we're seeing with 'Mindfire' & the fact that it's coming out of Switzerland.

Anthony Patch: I will present it as somewhat of a prediction...
We will see a shift in the media coverage of AI - moving away from using the term 'AI' at the highest levels & applications of AI to using this term 'Artificial Organisms'.

So make a note of that folks, you heard it first on the Kev Baker Show - 'Artifical Organisms' rather than speaking in terms of 'AI'. Now what does this mean?

I'll cut right to the chase... In the past, we have described the data storage - our mainframe, where our memories lie - is within our DNA, its not in the human brain. We said this on the Wednesday show (15-Nov 2017). The brain is the processor. If you think about a graphics program that is running a desktop, in a tower - you're running your games through your graphics intensive PC or Mac - and you will have one of two drives, and then you'll have a terabite external drive, or larger hardrive within the system. The one, two or three, terabite system or drive, is much like our DNA. And then you'll have faster access drives on the motherboard - that's the same thing as our human brain.

So, there are limited memories within the brain itself. The majority of them are stored in the DNA. This is why they are going to Artificial Organisms. This is a whole body approach. And within this article from Futurism.com (https://futurism.com/global-collaboration-create-artificial-organisms-live/), by Patrick Caughill on November 17, 2017 - that's our source.

They're speaking in terms of exactly that. The DNA - representing the body. And the brain - representing the quantum computer - are now being utilized together, as an entire artificial intelligent, an artificial organism environment. It's no longer just counterfitting the brain, but counterfitting the DNA, as well.

Kev Baker: Quoting once again from this article:

“We cannot achieve True AI until we understand actual intelligence. Intelligence has evolved as a means of nature to successfully guide us through an ever-changing environment. This gave rise to behavior, emotions, and consciousness. These critical factors must be taken into account in how we develop AI. This is the purpose of the Mindfire Foundation,”
Now this has echoes of Geordie Rose (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlRVMNVXm3Q) with his Kindred Company (https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/168565-69)
, Anthon - the fact that its trying to mimic everything from the real world, in an attempt to give it, imo, consciousness.

Anthony Patch: Right. And, you're tying Elon Musk in, we're tying in Geordie Rose, with his robotics company, Kindred. We're tying in Eric Ladizinsky (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMN4MC_21xE) with D-Wave. We're connecting Ben Goertzel - and his SingularityNET.io - in with the Blue Brain Project. As we said, they're all feeding their research in to essentially just one location, which is Switzerland.

So that's what Mindfire is part of. And this is where they're going to merge the DNA research that we've talked about with such laboratories as the Institute for Human Longetivity, Inc., of Craig Venter (https://www.humanlongevity.com/about/j-craig-venter/), in La Jolla, California, and there are many others.

Let me give you another touchpoint on the Human Genome. The Human Genome was mapped utilizing a synchrotron particle accelerator - a very small one compared to CERN - but identical in its design & operation & that was a UC Berkely. So, this mapping of the Human Genome utilized the synchrotron particle accelerator. The same thing is happening at CERN utilizing that, not only for human DNA research, but mapping for the human brain.

All of these sychrotrons around the world are quantum computers.


-----------------

A.I. LIVES MATTER
@28:00
Anthony Patch: If the robot is acting warm & fuzzy... Let's say, in the beginning is acting like a adolescent & is non-threatening, then people cozy up to it - they embrace it. They think its wonderful to have an A.I. robot around. And yet, underpinning this is a very dark side to it. And there are plenty of people - not just me & you, Kev - that have been raising this issue that are leaders in the scientific arena who have said, "We need to be careful with A.I. And as even as far back as 2014, our friend Elon Musk said, "We are letting the genie out of the bottle."

So, the debate goes on. But yet, A.I. continues to advance. And I think the debate is just for public consumption, and I don't really believes that these guys are afraid of A.I. because even Elon Musk is incorporating A.I. into his vehicles.

So, to say 'The genie is out of the bottle'... to say that 'we're dancing with the devil'... any of those things is really just for public consumption. So, you really need to look beyond the little catch phrases that they put out & understand this is all a part of a strong delusion.

Folks, consider AI & Artificial Organisms to be that strong delusion, because it further says that perhaps even the 'elect' might be deceived. Obviously, when we get to the point of Artificial Organisms, we're getting to the point of the beast. Not just the beast system, but the image of the beast being created. We're talking about an Artificial, if you will - a humanoid... maybe, a hybrid, if you want...

Certainly it is something that is artificially constructed from artificial DNA. And when I say that, I mean, digitized DNA. In which you can arrange, literally, at the quantum scale, the building blocks of DNA into any type of living organism you want. It has to have living material to start with. It has to have a base material, but then from there you can re-arrange. They cannot create life. Only God can do that. But when they're talking about creating an artificial organism, when I look at that in relation to Biblical scripture, we are looking at the creation of the image of the beast. And that is something that Kathleen Urquhart & myself will be talking about at length on the 16th of December in our one-day webinar that is coming up.

This is the image of the beast being created. It is artificial. And it is the strong delusion. People are being deluded into thinking that Artificial Intelligence is somehow the panacea - the solution - to all of our problems as humans. And its quite the opposite.



-----------------

@1:33:30
Anthony Patch: You may recall things back in the 80s & 90s called "Multi-Level Marketing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing)." Well this is what bitcoin essentially is - a sophisticated form of multi-level marketing.

It is also a ponzi-scheme. Because, the essence of a ponzi scheme is that the scheme stays alive, and the returns on investment are paid out to investors so long as there are new investors come in at "the ground floor" - to keep supporting the system - so that it has a system of paying-out. This is what bitcoin & cryptocurrencies are - they're ponzi schemes. Very simple to explain.

And people are buying into it. They are biting into the bitcoin. And, they're playing the game. And as long as people believe that there's value in these cryptocurrencies, they will continue to trade their dollars & euros, etc., for cryptocurrencies.

Now again, as review, most every business, large & small, realizes that it either has to adopt existing cryptocurrencies, or create their own. This is what Amazon, as I said on Friday (17-November 2017) Kev, I believe that Amazon very quickly will be releasing their own form of cryptocurrency.

We saw on Friday that the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that they are issuing a FEDCoin. So, a huge ponzi scheme. But it is for the purpose of teaching AI! Every transaction is done to teach A.I. - that's what is underneath, folks.

And, we talked about transparency in A.I. in terms of the developers of different A.I. platforms putting out into the public domain all of their research. Why would they do that - why would they make public all of their expensive research?

Well, the scenario is - the same as a drug dealer - giving away sample drugs so as to hook people who then must return to the drug dealer, as the source, of their next fix. This is exactly what cryptocurrency is. It is getting people sucked into a system that they are dependent upon, and believe in. And that they believe is going to pay them a large return in a ponzi scheme. And so, they continue to propagate the notion that there is value in cryptocurrency so that more people will come in and add money to the system.

So, this is exactly the 'drug dealer on the corner' system. And it is the 'beast' system. And when cryptocurrency is the only form of currency, you must take the 'mark of the beast' to participate in it. So, the drug dealer has you hooked.

_________@1:19:20__________

11.16.17
The Female Supercomputer Designer
Who Inspired Steve Jobs (https://www.fastcodesign.com/90151279/the-woman-supercomputer-designer-who-inspired-steve-jobs)

The designer and artist Tamiko Thiel gets her due in a new show at MoMA.
https://images.fastcompany.net/image/upload/w_562,ar_16:9,c_fill,g_auto,f_auto,q_auto,fl_lossy/wp-cms/uploads/sites/4/2017/11/p-1-the-female-supercomputer-designer-who-inspired-steve-jobs.gif
Tamiko Thiel working on CM-1 prototype, 1985. [Photo: © Tamiko Thiel]

https://images.fastcompany.net/image/upload/w_596,c_limit,q_auto:best,f_auto,fl_lossy/wp-cms/uploads/sites/4/2017/11/3-the-female-supercomputer-designer-who-inspired-steve-jobs.jpg
CM-2 with DataVault mass storage device, 1987. [Image: © Thinking Machines Corporation,
1987/Steve Grohe (photo)/courtesy Tamiko Thiel]

[petra]

In regards to the self driving cars, I saw a tv programme that actually made me weep. It was about the programming involved when multiple dangers detected. How does the car prioritize this?? Glad I'm not the one programming it, that's for sure - I weep for the programmers.

Also they talked about how things like this might influence consumer decisions. Do I want a car that prioritizes ME? Or do I want a car that prioritizes children OVER me? Would anyone even want a car that has conditions programmed to kill them? It's just crazy to think about.

[turiya]

In regards to the self driving cars, I saw a tv programme that actually made me weep. It was about the programming involved when multiple dangers detected. How does the car prioritize this?? Glad I'm not the one programming it, that's for sure - I weep for the programmers.

Also they talked about how things like this might influence consumer decisions. Do I want a car that prioritizes ME? Or do I want a car that prioritizes children OVER me? Would anyone even want a car that has conditions programmed to kill them? It's just crazy to think about.

Interesting... Can you provide a link to that particular program video?
I've always have been quite skeptical regarding driverless cars. Perhaps, its because that is what I do for a living.
Have always felt it was all about control... Control over where people can go & when people can travel. I'm sure that there are people that feel it would be a great benefit... especially the elderly. Its common for the elderly to develop a difficulty in driving at night - a limited night vision.

There is a Max Keiser Report in which they interview a man whose job is to monitor a driverless car that Lyft is developing. Its being tested in North Dakota. In that interview, it shows the driver doesn't touch the steering wheel. As, his job is to simply monitor the system & report what he finds.

Funny, when Max asks him the question about him being in the transition to a driverless car and, eventually, he will not be needed to do his job... the driver didn't understand the point of the question. Max calls it the oncoming AI Apocalypse... @4:30



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHgbAh0jgNs

[petra]

Interesting... Can you provide a link to that particular program video?

I wish I could but no, it was on my local cable TV and I have no idea what news I was even watching. The key word to look for is "ethics", and "ethical programming"

I do web site development for a living, which is kind of like programming, and so I understand the need for control. If you don't control things, it makes a big mess! There are certain things though, that need human interaction. Without the human interaction, it would be dangerous. Safety first..... and for my own safety (and the safety of others!!)..... I want to control my car. ALL of it :)

[Omni]

"No one really knows how the most advanced algorithms
do what they do. That could be a problem."

The CIA knows. The Ai builder just needs a proper diagnostics of coding and that solves the problem. It's not like the AI's algorithms are metaphysical and not trackable/surveillable with a proper setup.

[petra]

"No one really knows how the most advanced algorithms
do what they do. That could be a problem."

The CIA knows. The Ai builder just needs a proper diagnostics of coding and that solves the problem. It's not like the AI's algorithms are metaphysical and not trackable/surveillable with a proper setup.

There's also the aptitude to understand the algorithms, and "how much of the CIA knows". Just thought I'd chuck a few more problems on there :)

[Ernie Nemeth]

With a normal, linear program, there is a logical order of steps that can be followed to see where the problem happened.

Even so, any algorithms within the program are intact and indecipherable - they either give the right result or they don't.

This sort of simulated learning does not have a linear program, instead it has a neural net of connections and sensor inputs. The program is as much in the architecture as it is in the coding. The logic of the program is both the linear coding and the physical system it runs on. The coding can still be tested and the source of the problem found ...but... the reason for any action is impossible to uncover because it is a function of algorithms, programming and architecture combined.

[Michelle Marie]

With a normal, linear program, there is a logical order of steps that can be followed to see where the problem happened.

Even so, any algorithms within the program are intact and indecipherable - they either give the right result or they don't.

This sort of simulated learning does not have a linear program, instead it has a neural net of connections and sensor inputs. The program is as much in the architecture as it is in the coding. The logic of the program is both the linear coding and the physical system it runs on. The coding can still be tested and the source of the problem found ...but... the reason for any action is impossible to uncover because it is a function of algorithms, programming and architecture combined.

Can you please elaborate on the point "the program is as much in the architecture as it is in the coding?" What do you mean by architecture-- the programming language? The operating system? The interface of the two?

Also, if you would please, explain " the logic of the program is both the linear programming and the physical system it runs on"

Are you saying these neural networks have a "life of their own" and output/result can't be determined?

It almost sounds like multi-generation programming language and functions were derived that are too complicated for the programmer to determine the output, even given the input and the processing schematics that they, themselves, have coded.

Without certain results, safety could be a huge issue!

Maybe I just need to hear your explanations to understand better. Thank you for your patience in this process of increasing understanding.

MM

[petra]

Sounds to me like it's impossible to reproduce the exact conditions. If the exact action cannot be reproduced, then of course it's impossible to uncover the reasoning behind that action in order to debug it further.

Maybe I am way off, I'm just repeating the typical problem that I run into every time I try to debug something.

[Ernie Nemeth]

In a normal computer and linear program each line of the program is a sequential step in a logic tree designed to accomplish some given task - like a word processor for example. Every possible entry of the keyboard is accounted for in the program and various options are available but each must be accessed in sequential order and one at a time. This means that every time a keystroke is detected the program runs the entire logic tree until that particular keystroke and the resulting action is determined and executed. Every time a new entry is made, the program runs through its entire line by line code.

Although in a learning machine there is a set of instructions, it does not account for every eventuality. Instead, an optimal range of desired outcomes are listed and the program attempts to match those criteria. No method of achieving the outcome is listed and the machine must find its own successful outcome by simple trial and error. The learning is achieved as the errors smooth out and the proper output begins to appear as if by magic. It is not intelligence, it is mimicry and repetition.

Out of this clever but simple method more sophisticated techniques have been added, such as human training, where the machine's inputs are hooked directly to a human instructor who goes through the required motions until the machine learns to mimic the set of movements. One example of this type of learning is the painting robot in the car plant.

The architecture side of the machine is a chip that has been designed specifically for the task of simulated learning. Its connections are not usually addressable. That is, its memory slots cannot be accessed directly by the programmer. Instead, the connections in the chip are multiple and each memory slot has a connection to every other memory position. With these over-abundance of connections, inputs and outputs mix with no apparent order. But as the outputs come out they pass through a linear program. This is the program that controls the output. Not by listing every eventuality the machine might encounter but by describing a set of acceptable outcomes. The machine just churns away until it gets the right output by chance. When it gets the right output it 'remembers' the actions that gave it those results and begins a process of optimizing its performance to correctly determine the proper course of action for every input eventuality on the fly.

This is what gives it the simulated perception of intelligence, but it is not. But it could one day 'accidentally' become sentient if the machine is sophisticated enough.

[turiya]

This is what gives it the simulated perception of intelligence, but it is not. But it could one day 'accidentally' become sentient if the machine is sophisticated enough.

http://www.oshonews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/osho-news-red.jpg (http://www.oshonews.com)

Osho Speaks on Artificial Intelligence (http://www.oshonews.com/2014/06/20/osho-artificial-intelligence/)


Osho,
My friend, who has a PhD in computing, and whose thesis was on ‘artificial intelligence’, says that man is a biochemical computer and nothing more.

The Buddha has said that all things are composite and there is no self, no soul, no spirit, no ‘I’, which seems to agree with my friend’s viewpoint. Could you please help me, because I feel that there is something missing from these views but I can’t see it myself.Prem Hamid,

Man certainly is a biocomputer, but something more too. About ninety-nine point nine percent of people it can be said that they are only biocomputers and nothing more. Ordinarily one is only the body and the mind, and both are composites. Unless one moves into meditation one cannot find that which is something more, something transcendental to body and mind.

The psychologists, particularly the behaviourists, have been studying man for half a century, but they study the ordinary man, and of course their thesis is proved by all their studies. The ordinary man, the unconscious man, has nothing more in him than the bodymind composite. The body is the outer side of the mind and the mind the inner side of the body. Both are born and both will die one day.


https://i1.wp.com/www.oshonews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Osho.jpg?resize=565%2C440 But there is something more. That something more makes a man awakened, enlightened, a Buddha, a Christ. But a Buddha, or a Christ, is not available to be studied by Pavlov, Skinner, Delgado and others. Their study is about the unconscious man, and of course when you study the unconscious man you will not find anything transcendental in him. The transcendental exists in the unconscious man only as a potential, as a possibility; it is not yet realized, it is not yet a reality. Hence you cannot study it.

You can study it only in a Buddha, but even then studying is obviously very difficult, just very close to the impossible, because what you will study in a Buddha will again be his behaviour. And if you are determined that there is nothing more, if you have already concluded, then even in his behaviour you will see only mechanical reactions, you will not see his spontaneity. To see that spontaneity you have also to become a participant in meditation.

- A computer cannot feel boredom,
- A computer cannot feel meaninglessness,
- A computer cannot experience anguish.
- A computer cannot start an enquiry about truth,
- A computer cannot renounce the world and become a sannyasin (disciple),
- A computer cannot go to the mountains or to the monasteries.
- It cannot conceive of anything beyond the mechanical –
and all that is significant is beyond the mechanical.
Psychology can become only a real psychology when meditation becomes its foundation. The word ‘psychology’ means the science of the soul. Modern psychology is not yet a science of the soul.

Buddha certainly has denied the self, the ego, the ‘I’, but he has not denied the soul and the self and the soul are not synonymous. He denies the self because the self exists only in the unconscious man. The unconscious man needs a certain idea of ‘I’, otherwise he will be without a centre. He does not know his real centre. He has to invent a false centre so that he can at least function in the world, otherwise his functioning will become impossible. He needs a certain idea of ‘I’.

You must have heard about Descartes’ famous statement:

“cogito ergo sum – I think, therefore I am.”

A professor, teaching the philosophy of Descartes, was asked by a student, “Sir, I think, but how do I know that I am?”
The professor pretended to peer around the classroom. “Who is asking the question?” he said.
“I am,” replied the student.One needs a certain idea of ‘I’, otherwise functioning will become impossible. So because we don’t know the real ‘I’ we substitute it by a false ‘I’ – something invented, composite.

No biocomputer or any other kind of computer
has any idea of self or no-self.Buddha denies the self because to him ‘self’ simply is another name for the ego, with a little colour of spirituality, otherwise there is no difference. His word is anatta. Atta means ‘self’, anatta means ‘no-self’. But he is not denying the soul. In fact he says when the self is completely dropped, then only you will come to know the soul. But he does not say anything about it because nothing can be said about it.

His approach is via negativa. He says:

You are not the body, you are not the mind, you are not the self. He goes on denying, eliminating. He eliminates everything that you can conceive of, and then he does not say anything what is left. That which is left is your reality: that utterly pure sky without clouds, no thought, no identity, no emotion, no desire, no ego – nothing is left. All clouds have disappeared… just the pure sky.It is inexpressible, unnameable, indefinable. That’s why he keeps absolutely silent about it. He knows it that if anything is said about it you will immediately jump back to your old idea of the self If he says, “There is a soul in you,” what you are going to understand? You will think that, “He calls it soul and we call it self – it is the same. The supreme self maybe, the spiritual self; it is not ordinary ego.” But spiritual or unspiritual, the idea of my being a separate entity is the point.

Buddha denies that you are a separate entity from the whole. You are one with the organic unity of existence, so there is no need to say anything about your separateness. Even the word ‘soul’ will give you a certain idea of separateness; you are bound to understand it in your own unconscious way.

Hamid, your friend says that “Man is a biochemical computer and nothing more.”

Can a biochemical computer say that? Can a biochemical computer deny the self, the soul? No biocomputer or any other kind of computer has any idea of self or no-self. Your friend is doing it – certainly he is not a biochemical computer. No biochemical computer can write a thesis on artificial intelligence! Do you think artificial intelligence can write a thesis about artificial intelligence? Something more is needed.

- A computer cannot have any awareness.
- A computer is incapable of feeling silence.
And these are the qualities which prove
that man has something more than artificial intelligence.
And he is absolutely wrong in thinking that Buddha says also the same thing:

… That all things are composite and there is no self no soul, no spirit, no ‘I’. He is wrong to think that Buddha agrees with his viewpoint – not at all. Buddha’s experience is of meditation. Without meditation nobody can have any idea what Buddha is talking about. Your friend’s observation is from the standpoint of a scientific onlooker. It is not his experience, it is his observation. He is studying biochemical computers, artificial intelligence, from the outside. Who is studying outside?

Can you conceive two computers studying each other? The computer can have only that which has been fed into it; it cannot have more than that. The information has to be given to it, then it keeps it in its memory – it is a memory system. It can do miracles as far as mathematics is concerned. A computer can be far more efficient than any Albert Einstein as far as mathematics is concerned, but a computer cannot be a meditator. Can you imagine a computer just sitting silently doing nothing, the spring comes and the grass grows by itself…?

There are many qualities which are impossible for the computer. A computer cannot be in love. You can keep many computers together – they will not fall in love! A computer cannot have any experience of beauty. A computer cannot know any bliss. A computer cannot have any awareness. A computer is incapable of feeling silence. And these are the qualities which prove that man has something more than artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence can do scientific work, mathematical work, calculation – great calculation and very quick and very efficiently, because it is a machine. But a machine cannot be aware of what it is doing. A computer cannot feel boredom, a computer cannot feel meaninglessness, a computer cannot experience anguish. A computer cannot start an enquiry about truth, it cannot renounce the world and become a sannyasin, it cannot go to the mountains or to the monasteries. It cannot conceive of anything beyond the mechanical – and all that is significant is beyond the mechanical.

A policeman starts chasing a car after noticing that the driver is a computer, a robot – wearing a hat, smoking a cigar and driving with one hand hanging out of the window.
He finally succeeds in stopping the car. He approaches it and sees to his surprise that there is a man sitting next to the computer.
“Are you mad?” exclaims the officer, “letting your computer drive?”
“Excuse me, officer,” replies the man, “I asked him for a lift!”
Yes, in stories it is possible, but not in reality.

Mr. Polanski enjoys playing with cuckoo clocks. One rainy Sunday morning he takes his cuckoo clock apart and puts it back together again.
At twelve o’clock the family gathers, waiting for the pretty little bird to sing its song… nothing happens. They wait till one o’clock – no cuckoo. At two o’clock they are still waiting for the bird to appear. Finally, at three o’clock, the little door opens and the cuckoo comes out.
“Dammit!” it squeaks. “Do any of you guys know the time?”
Osho, I Am That, Chpt 4, Q 1 (http://www.oshonews.com/2014/06/20/osho-artificial-intelligence/)

[turiya]

Lynette Zang:


"I want to know what the bankers have planned for us... hyperinflation is happening now... And I'm reading right now a report from the IMF on the advantages of taxation in a completely digital world, where they're talking about having the ability to look at your whole-life-time of earnings, spending, wealth accumulation & how easy it is to do that will this blockchain technology, so they can really do a nice wealth-transfer from one group to another easily. And create all these complicated tax structures with this blockchain system. But it is not outside the system. It is the system.

While you'll see bitcoin, or any of the cryptos making new highs, etc. - that's to get you into the system. It is not outside the system - it is the system. Its got to crash, because that's the way they conclude the transition."
Guess Who's Spewing the Ultimate FUD
(Fear - Uncertainty - Doubt)
(Nov 22, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJBbOM9LfCk&t=551s_______________




The following is a linear graph on when all of the banks & the bigger companies & major corporations, including DTC - the legal registered owner of all those fiat products - started to get involved in bitcoin & the blockchain technology & the other cryptos.
http://mmbiz.qpic.cn/mmbiz_jpg/YvhCvnnFNOiaEniaQ0VgO0EYibpBq4fJwwvjic8KWxLUOrTiah X3YDZiccwaYeIwn08ujTbrC2JDMzicETHxJAg21uwwg/640?wx_fmt=jpeg (https://www.cbinsights.com/research/financial-services-corporate-blockchain-investments/)

https://www.enterprisetimes.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Money-flower-2.jpg

____________________________

King of BlockChain Peter Thiel - #bitcoin
#Ripple #Etherium #Aragon #Augur
(Nov 23, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH6BisBx3A0



Peter Thiel is being considered to chair
Trump’s intelligence advisory board (https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/20/peter-thiel-piab-trump/)

Posted Sep 20, 2017 by Taylor Hatmaker (https://techcrunch.com/author/taylor-hatmaker/)

http://media.phunutoday.vn/files/upload_images/2014/12/11/trieu-phu-internet-6(1).jpg

The Trump administration’s PIAB site is not functional at this time, but the Obama administration offers its archived description (https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/administration/eop/piab) of the board’s role:
The Intelligence Oversight Board oversees the Intelligence Community’s compliance with the Constitution and all applicable laws, Executive Orders, and Presidential Directives.

It complements and supplements, rather than duplicates the oversight roles of the Director of National Intelligence, Department and Agency Inspectors General and General Counsels, and the Congressional Oversight Committees.Thiel might be controversial, but he’s a logical fit for the key intelligence advisory role. His data mining company Palantir is probably most famous for its contracts with government intelligence agencies (https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/11/leaked-palantir-doc-reveals-uses-specific-functions-and-key-clients/), and he’s a longtime Trump ally (https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/10/peter-thiel-to-back-trump-as-gop-presidential-candidate/) who has never wavered (https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/31/in-speech-peter-thiel-defends-what-trump-represents-much-more-so-than-candidate-himself/)in response to the kind of controversial choices by the Trump administration that provoke outspoken backlash from most corners of Silicon Valley. Under a normal presidency, his investment in companies with active government contracts might stir up conflict of interest questions with the PIAB role, but it’s hard to imagine that being a hurdle under a president who actively promotes his family business (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38069298) from the highest office in the land.

As a senior aide to the White House told Vanity Fair, “Peter has indicated that if he takes the P.I.A.B. position he intends to take a comprehensive look at the U.S. intelligence community’s information-technology architecture.” The source added that “He is super-concerned about Amazon and Google [and Facebook]… He’s concerned about the monopolistic tendencies of [all three] companies and how they deny economic well-being to people they disagree with.” If the latter part of that quote holds up, it’s a strange and telling priority set for the man who put Gawker out of business (https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanmac/2016/05/24/this-silicon-valley-billionaire-has-been-secretly-funding-hulk-hogans-lawsuits-against-gawker/#5561cd118d14). It also has way more to do with regulation than intelligence, but Thiel’s vision of a governmental paradigm shift has always been broad.
Source (https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/20/peter-thiel-piab-trump/)

[turiya]

Latest Jason Goodman interview with Quinn Michaels.... the connection between cryptocurrencies & A.I.....


Crypto Conspiracy and the Road
to the AI Singularity
(Nov 25, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEWm1OOHLkw



@11:00
Quinn Michaels: The crypto conspiracy is that when I research alot of the bigger coins they're all backed by huge, mammoth dot coms, or movie studios - like Time-Warner is a backer in Discord (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bti_o6vUSdE) & other people who are backing Discord chatter are also backing cryptocurrency.

And so, all these companies start creating a spiderweb trail of dots. And, when you connect them, it leads you to believe... that when you put Artificial Intelligence in the center of it, its a big giant conspiracy of all the 'dot coms' & everyone in the world keeping a secret & spending all out tax money on all these crypto miners & these A.I. research programs. Because, I've calculated between Peter Thiel (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel) & Marc Andreessen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen) & just Google Ventures (https://www.gv.com/), they've dumped somewhere in the vicinity of $10+ billion dollars into cryptocurrency in the last 5 years.

Jason Goodman: For so many people cryptocurrency its still a new thing. Most people have heard of Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum (https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-ethereum-bitcoin-cash-ripple-litecoin-price-analysis-october-30) - those are the biggest. I've been looking at some of the alternative ones we spoke about - Tezos (https://twitter.com/tez0s?lang=en) thing. And there's something here called Dash (http://bitcoinchaser.com/cryptocurrency/dash), which is digital cash...

I was looking around at all these different things. And it seems that there are new, crazy cryptocurrencies popping out all the time. We just heard from the founder of Wikipedia saying these intitial coin offerrings are essentially a scam. The M.I.T. Technology Review has this article which is saying Hijacking Computers to Mine Cryptocurrency is All the Rage (https://www.cryptocurrency.rodipex.com/hijacking-computers-to-mine-cryptocurrency-is-all-the-rage/). I speak to Charles Ortel about cryptocurrency and he is very, very wary of it. He doesn't trust it he feels that its a scam. Now, we've got articles from major news sites - CNBC, MIT - talking about the ways in which these things are being operated by scammers. And you've identified this crypto conspiracy. But yet, you're still dealing in cryptocurrency, right?

Quinn Michaels: I do because I'm learning how the systems work. And I'm watching the markets & I'm watching how things grow. And I allow people to send me cryptos as offerings. I don't think its bad. I wasn't so agreeable to the technology before I did alot of deep research & found out the 'real crypto' is made by people at Stanford. Its made by people at M.I.T. & its back by the biggest dot coms in the world.

Jason Goodman: What's the 'real crypto'?

Quinn Michaels: The 'real crypto' is what they're going to come out when their crypto conspiracy succeeds. Certain things should stabilize - the ones that all the dot coms have invested billions of dollars in should stabilize. And basically, it looks like they're setting up the guys that all all the patsy schemes to force regulation later. So that way, all their big companies are set up to transfer bitcoin into credit cards & do - like coinbase's New York Stock Exchange backing (http://fortune.com/2017/06/02/bitcoin-exchange-coinbase-1-billion-valuation/) - so when the crime happens, you have all these people in place that are saying - "Hey look, we got in on it early! And now, we have all these services to provide these big businesses." - Because, Peter Thiel & Andreeson are all making enterprise cryptocurrency tools.

They have got way too much money invested in this just to let it crash. So it looks like - because Peter Thiel follows scapegoating logic (http://www.businessinsider.com/peter-thiel-on-rene-girards-influence-2014-11), it looks like they've invested with the intention to get people all sucked into the ponzi schemes - to force regulation - to benefit them later. You know, kind of like - create the problem, then offer the solution. Like, "Hey, we have this new technology that solves your problems from these 'scam' coins.


Jason Goodman: Oh... Well, the classic Hegelian dialectic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic), right?

[turiya]

From the end of September.... Lynette Zang on the cryptos....


The Drive to Cryptocurrencies,
Who is Really Driving This Bus?
(Sep 28, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PChjGysro4w

Officially, there is only 4 cents in value left out of the original 100 cents and as the value of the dollar has declined, so have interest rates. So here we are at the end of the currencies lifecycle and the only place to go now is to attack principal and that’s where negative interest rates fit in. Thus the push to cyber space. There are those that believe cryptocurrencies bypass central banks. But what if they don’t? What if they actually support the goals of the established system? What would that mean if everything we earned, owned and spent was controlled by a small group of technocrats? Today’s webinar explores these questions and more.

https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/drive-cryptocurrencies-really-driving-bus-lynette-zang/

https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Slide2-5.jpg

https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Slide8-4.jpg

https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Slide12-2.jpg

[turiya]

SGT video shows you what is real wealth... and just WHO it is that is the richest in the world...


Rothschild TRILLIONS Quantified
(Nov 27, 2017)
https://img.youtube.com/vi/Cl1-gbGz458/0.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl1-gbGz458)


Do you honestly believe Jeff Bezos is the world's richest man? A guy who started selling books over the internet 20 years ago!? History tells a different story. The Rothschilds are worth several hundred TRILLION dollars. Here's the quantifiable numbers. It's a simple matter of math, market manipulation and compounding interest. The family bragged about the wealth they made as a result of the Battle of Waterloo. They even bankrolled a Hollywood movie about it in 1934 starring Boris Karloff as Nathan Rothschild, 'The House of Rothschild' which you can watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqCTv... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqCTvW5URfY)

[turiya]

As you can see, the cryptos are now taking off at rocket-speed... believe it - the take down of the economy will happen in a sudden flash... catching everyone totally off-guard, with no time to really think rationally about what will be taking place - the shift into a cashless monetary system...

Dave of X22Report.com has been watching the indicators as to when the cabal, the Deep State, the Banksters are preparing & getting ready to take the economy down & implement this new cashless system... cued the video to play @ 11:50


The Cabal Has Entered The Second Stage Event,
The Setup Is Almost Complete - Episode 1435b
(Nov 29, 2017)
https://img.youtube.com/vi/i9PejnihHhE/0.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/i9PejnihHhE?t=11m50s)
https://youtu.be/i9PejnihHhE?t=11m50s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9PejnihHhE&feature=youtu.be&t=3m)

[turiya]

A bit of a spat going on between Quinn Michaels vs Clif High... Quinn's initial video that Quinn made criticized Clif High has since been taken down... Clif, who has been promoting Bitcoin & other cryptocurrencies for quite some time, does have a tendency to overdo his own knowledge base... just a personal observation...

Btw, here's one of the video segments of Clif High that Quinn Michaels is referring to (Clif initially calls Quinn an idiot): https://youtu.be/EueDsKi25vo?t=20m20s

The following vid was created by a third party... no doubt on the side of Clif - the opposing side to Quinn - which suggests it would be probably the character known as Defango... I suspect Degango has recorded remnants of it & other of Quinn Michaels vids... Nerds get testy with each other just like other non-nerds...


Quinn Michaels Vs Clif High Pt 1
(Nov 17, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEVMakq5sDY
From the Comments section:

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-dmSeQPIhG08/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/bI1kjsrRTRw/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/user/quinnmichaels)
quinn michaels (https://www.youtube.com/user/quinnmichaels) 1 week ago (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEVMakq5sDY&lc=UgxxaQwkCdjYMPUbOAt4AaABAg)

wow... you guys really don't know what you are talking about. You could have invited me to your little conference so I could help with your incorrect understanding.

Here is a blip from the actual Etherium paper... from the people who wrote it:

Ethereum, taken as a whole, can be viewed as a transaction-based state machine: we begin with a genesis state and incrementally execute transactions to morph it into some final state. https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?redir_token=sIc1BC4DQg4eQmXnsM0pMLH1H6h8M TUxMjMwNDE2NEAxNTEyMjE3NzY0&event=comments&q=https%3A%2F%2Fethereum.github.io%2Fyellowpaper%2 Fpaper.pdf)You guys might want to read that paper from Etherium before you start talking out your butts. I'd suggest you think twice before posting anymore videos about me cause if I see anymore I'm going to make all of you look really bad.
In the meantime, down below will be shown the recent Jason Goodman interview of Clif High...


Clif High On Bitcoin, AI and
the Future of Cryptocurrency
(Streamed live 12 hours ago - Dec 1, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkB-fSLV74w

@1:57
Clif High: I've been in bitcoin since before the Mt Gox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox) crash. I remember the great day when bitcoin achieved parody with the U.S. dollar one for one. So, been in it a long time.

Jason Goodman: When did bitcoin start?

Clif High: Nominally, it began circulating in late 2009 in the form of a 'white paper'. And so, bitcoin was an idea then, an idea of a currency that ran on a thing called the 'blockchain' which was a consensus machine (http://www.economist.com/node/335281). And that consensus machine could operate across time zones, across geographic barriers instantly, or close to it. And, we could have a system where we could have an electronic currency that couldn't be double-spent because of the consensus machine that was the blockchain.

Jason Goodman: And the blockchain, that we've established, is basically a ledger that is stored on every computer that's involved with bitcoin, is that correct?

Clif High: No, it's a ledger that's stored in every computer that is mining or has a copy of the entire chain.

So, it used to be that when you got into bitcoin, you would download a bitcoin wallet. And the first thing that it would do would be to connect to the blockchain & take 5 or 6 days, depending on when it was... It would then connect - you had to let it run until it had an entire copy of the chain on your pc - and then it was relatively fast. Since then, we've got a bit more diversified in our understanding of this. We've separated the concept of the wallets from the mining - mining is done by specialized software, etc. So, its not fair to say that every machine that has a bitcoin on it has a copy of the blockchain, although many, that are old, do.

Jason Goodman: To be clear... You & I became aquainted, most recently, because of some of the controversial statements that Quinn Michaels has made on this channel. And, I understand that you've disagreed, in large part, with some of the things that Quinn said. Quinn was basically saying that A.I. & cryptocurrency are tied together, and you say that's not the case.

Clif High: Correct. That's not the case. AI can be quite sophisticated. Its still a brute-force software that just goes through & makes choices based on the inputs. But the blockchain is more solid, but at the same time, far less sophisticated. The blockchain is a consensus algorithm (https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=h6QiWvjuE-XEjwTkxoPABA&q=consensus+algorithm&oq=consensus+algorithm&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.2426.2426.0.3694.2.1.0.0.0.0.105.105.0j 1.1.0....0...1c..64.psy-ab..1.1.101.0...0.MWQ0XPXuiug), and that's all it is. And this algorithm is shared in software that's run on the mining machines. And they're all synched on atomic clocks.

And that's essentially all that it is. To merge the idea of A.I. in with the software that is the blockchain &/or the cryptocurrencies does everthing a disservice. It muddies the water for those that are afraid of A.I. that have watched too many movies of... you know, the giant robot that comes & eats us all. Or, the computer that decides its alive... that kind of thing. Anyways, those people become scared. They don't want to mess with the cryptocurrencies or get involved. And it also denigrates the A.I., which is a very sophisticated level of programming involving collection of data that they refer to as 'machine learning' but the machine doesn't really learn... We just stuff databases with finer granularity that we can sift through on a finer level - really, is all that it amounts to.

So, I did have some dispute with the statements that were made, yes.

Jason Goodman: Sure. And on your website, HalfpastHuman.com, you've been involved in predictive linguistics & artificial intelligence plays a role there somehow, right? You've been doing AI stuff there for quite a while?

Clif High: I began doing AI when I first got into programming on my own system using a language called Prolog (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolog). It was one of two languages back in the day - late '80s / early '90s - that was touted as being an artificial intelligence language - the other one being Lisp (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)). I chose Prolog for a number of different reasons, but its programming & logic were for predicate calculus (https://www.britannica.com/topic/predicate-calculus). And it was used to make, what we called at the time, Expert systems (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system). And an Expert system is basically a brain dump from somebody that knows how to do something to a Coder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmer) that encodes it in software.

For instance, you can do a Brain dump (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_dump) on a mechanic & he could diagnose... and we could do a chunk of software that would do diagnostics on a car based on what a human said about it - the kind of noises, and this sort of thing. So all it is, is that person's expert analysis translated into software. And so AI at the time, was called Expert systems. It was a lot less sophisticated than now, because it was all, basically, manual - one human had to tell another human who typed it all into an encoding platform we called software, and then it would run & we'd get feedback from it.

So, I've been doing this since about '89. And I use some of the aspects of neural.... of natural language processing in my own system for predictive linguistics, which these days is called Sentiment Analysis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiment_analysis). The large corporations don't hire predictive linguistic experts, they hire people that are expert in Sentiment analysis software, or some language around that kind of a different categorization of the subject. So, you'll see that its well established with all the corporations that are doing any form of marketing, from Google all the way down to your local tire company.

Jason Goodman: So Sentiment analysis, that's like some computer program is looking at some comments on a youtube video and saying, "Hey, some angry about this, let's put some trolley comments in along this line."

Clif High: Not quite that sophisticated. The software that I've run into... that is out & about, isn't so definitive as to say they're angry. It comes back with results that are more nuanced, where it says,
"This comment shades towards negative." Or, "This comment shades towards positive." Or, "This comment appears to be neutral." Or, "This is a complex comment that has both aspects." And then you have a further level of an algorithm that decides what to do - based on whether you're a 'bad guy' or you're trying to market, or whatever.

Jason Goodman: There was a recent article (http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-mining-electricity-usage-2017-11) by Business Insider that said that bitcoin mining was going to consume all of the world's electric power generation, or something, by 2030. What do you think about this?

Clif High: Its hyperbole - basically, bullsh!t, because a bitcoin miner is just a bunch of graphics cards. In order to consume all of the electricity on the planet, imagine how many graphics cards would have to be in operation? You'd have to have at least 50-80 in your place right there, I'd have to have another couple hundred here, and everybody on the planet would have a few hundred - just to be able to get this going.

Its a FUD - fear, uncertainty & doubt. And its a way of click-bait, a way of getting eyes to your particular message.

Jason Goodman: So you don't think that this is a significant concern... that the growing demand for bitcoin will be taxing on the world's electricity supply? I mean, people would stop mining if it was costing more for the electric bill than the value of the bitcoin, right?

Clif High: Correct. Correct. Also, the mining operations have change dramatically in the last seven years. When it was first started off was basically a bunch of people that had spare computers sitting around, wrote alot of their own software, etcetera. But there's no reason to suppose that in order to supply bitcoin, we need to have vast quantities of miners. This is not like a forest & we're dealing with firewood, right? We don't have to grow more trees in order to produce more wood for more people just because there's demand.

Here, we have the ability to just do stuff within in the same environment & create more bitcoin just based on the algorithms involved. So, we're going to create the bitcoin just because we're mining. We're only going to mine at a certain rate, no matter what. So, its an instance of... we've got 17+ million bitcoin, now. Say that demand went up 10-fold, it just means we're going to have to share smaller & smaller bits because we're not going to get anymore bitcoin any faster no matter how many miners we put on.

Jason Goodman: You mean fractions of bitcoin

Clif High: Correct. Correct. Satoshis (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Satoshi_(unit)). And see, the thing is that bitcoin is controlled at its core by the Consesus algorithm of the blockchain, but also by this thing that's called the Hash (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hash). And the Hash is an algorithm that encodes & encrypts the private & public keys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography) involved in the transaction. That Hash increasing becomes more difficult over time. And so, the harder you mine bitcoin, the more it resists being mined.

It does not make any sense to envision a world where you have to put more electricity into trying to do it faster.

Jason Goodman:
So, is this just disinformation being put out by people who are owning banks, and have an interest in keeping the petro-dollar & fiat currencies... [/COLOR][/I]

Clif High: Its only speculation. The only we can say for sure is that it was click-bait from that website, because they've hot all those ads there. They're trying to use whatever they can to get you to come & read their site.... There was a provocative headline... you know.

Jason Goodman: Well, bitcoin right now is at an amazing $10,790, according to Coinbase. I know alot of people have different exchanges that they like to look at. And you know, the other day I went down to Wall Street & made a video, [B]"Is Wall Stree Bullish on Bitcoin" (https://youtu.be/zAWwCImFEjk). I'm sure you won't be surprised to learn that they were not bullish on bitcoin at all...

@14:00
People are fearful of it being hacked, and you mentioned the Mt Gox situation. That was a hack, wasn't it?

Clif High: Nope. Nope, it was not a hack. Okay, Mt Gox started out as a trading site for intangible goods based around a role-playing game. It was something... the game online... mystery, or something like that. It was a card game & you could sell & swap the tokens within the game, and then they added on bitcoin.

When they did that, they made a certain strategic decision. The decision was to not always have 100 percent of the bitcoins that everybody was buying. What they actually did..... they would do it, initially, they maybe had someone buy 6 bitcoins, and they bought 10. Then thereafter, they had somebody buy another 7, only they're not moving them off the exchange, they just left the bitcoins there. It was fractional reserve bitcoin sales based on...

And so, it was all internal. They claimed it was a hack in order to get out from underneath this inverse pyramid. They claimed it was a hack. There was no hack involved. What had happened was they had not bought enough bitcoin. People were trading the bitcoin back & forth at a furious rate on Mt Gox.

One day, Mt Gox got a situation where someone had amassed alot of bitcoin & then tried to take them off the exchange, and some of them didn't exist. And so, everything crashed at that point.

The blockchain per se can't be hacked. It theoretically could be taken over, or if you got 51% of all the miners to agree, then they could change software, or they could decide to do something & they would own the blockchain. But short of that, you can't in any way alter the blockchain itself. Bitcoin rides on top of the blockchain. And it can't be hacked per se, either. You could do something stupid. You could take your private key, print it out, show it to everybody online, and you'd lose your bitcoin. Because, you were stupid & you shared private information. But your wallet on your pc cannot be hacked by someone squirreling through to come & take your bit coin - like the NSA has backdoors in all of the pcs, etc., and they can come & steal all of your bitcoin.

And theoretically, they maybe could - but the actual practicality of it is an absurd idea. Its just not going to happen. If you're not connected, obviously you can't be hacked. The use of that word [hacked] relative to the blockchain really annoys me because its so inaccurate. We've not yet had a hack on any of the blockchains. We've had some spectacular screw-ups, okay. And this is bound to occur with software in anything that humans do. And, some of them are quite interesting. I happen to know of $14 million worth of Etherium that's locked up behind a smart contract that they can't figure out how to open up. Ha ha ha!

If you got bitcoin, and you buy it off the exchange, and it makes a transaction on the blockchain, and it goes to your pc & your pc is destroyed, your bitcoin is not destroyed, as long as you have elsewhere - the keys to that bitcoin or the password & stuff that allows you to recreate that wallet in its entirety to connect to the blockchain, it can recover & kickup from where you were. And this is true no matter where on the planet you end up having to be.

So in that sense, its much better than gold or silver or cash that's sitting in your house, and a giant wave or a storm or something, comes & takes your house out. Well here, if that occurs, you just walk on over to some place that's dry & warm & stuff - go into a motel - open up your laptop, download another wallet, recreate the whole thing & you're back in business.

Jason Goodman: Now let's get back to A.I. for a second. Because another topic that we've been talking about a bit is "strong A.I." And that has been coming up quite alot lately with Sophia from Hanson Robotics. But of course, you know, Sophia is the 1st robotic citizen of Saudi Arabia. But there is something with blockchain... I've heard one of the guys who is the principle at SingularityNET - Dr Ben Goertzel - they've got this AGI token. Does that have nothing to do with cryptocurrency or blockchain.

Clif High: Sure. But its an attempt to tokenize an AI market. Okay, these guys are not saying they're going to merge AI with the blockchain & your coins are at risk from AI. SingularityNET is, in fact, attempting to create a marketplace for AI software. And have a lot of people cooperate by creating AI software, putting it out there to do work, and then getting paid through the software doing the work through their platform. And their platform is going to use those tokens as its means of expression between the parties involved.

It would be like if I were to take part of my software & have a little predictive linguistics module & offer it for 'work for hire' on Singularity - I could do that. And then it would go out and negotiate contracts & do work for people - its sort of like having an API - Application Programming Interface (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface) - into your software that you then allow people to use for money.

Jason Goodman: So we recently heard a statement from the founder of Wikipedia, from perhaps CNBC.... And he's saying that "Initial coin offerings, although they're the hotest craze in cryptocurrency, they're an absolute scam." That's from Jimmy Wales. What do you think about that statement?

Clif High: Not much. I mean, that's his opinion. I don't find that to be the case. Actually, its a new - ICOs, as opposed to IPOs - its a new take on funding. And it cuts out the banks. It cuts out a huge... its called Disintermediation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disintermediation). It slices out a huge level of the middle. Its going to do away with all the people that made bonuses on offering shares of somebody elses company to their clients, and taking money from all the parties in the transaction in all these different areas, okay.

So, its going to cut out all the Wall Street people that are in the middle of IPOs. IPOs are dying as a funding mechanism. And the reason they're dying has to do with their structural incoherence & incompetence in today's age, and the costs that are involved that need not be there. And then we have an electronic, easier to understand, peer-to-peer method that allows funding to occur.

And so in that sense - no, it's not a scam - its a legitimate way to fund an enterprise of any kind, these days, in terms of a commercial offering. If you're going to produce a product, if you're going to come out with new software, if you're going to send rocket ships to the moon, you don't want to mess around with IPOs & have bankers take 35% of everything that's involved.

If you can also lower everybody's cost & get more money, you'd be foolish not to. And, there's a benefit also to the investors, here. In usual IPOs, you have all these lock-up periods, times you can't sell the shares that you've put money into, the returns... the huge returns - 50, 60, 80 baggers - they call them in Wall Street, right? Those go to the venture capitalists that are patient, that have managed to corner capital, and keep it locked up, and then feed it out under these particular circumstances. And so, those kind of gains are never seen by the ordinary guy who buys into the IPO, and then basically gets a little tiny returns, if any at all, on that investment within the system.

Here, we have in a different type of structure, where instantly that the ICO is done & the coin is available, in some cases, it can be traded. So, if you bought, and five minutes later you think you've made a big mistake, someone is going to offer you money at a discount to take that mistake off your hands - betting that later on it will turn out to not be a big mistake - and they'll make money on it. And, maybe individuals will think "its not a mistake, maybe I'll buy a couple more." And they hold onto these things, and they're small investors, and they don't necessarily meet the qualifications for sophisticated investors regarding, you know, as the SEC, etcetera, would see it. But nonetheless, these people are ones making the 50, 60, 70 & 80, and sometimes, hundred of thousands of times return on their investment. And the firms are getting money in a cleaner, easier fashion.

The whole thing can be managed with smart contracts. If you don't get a certain amount, you can undo it all & send all the money back. When did that ever happen with an IPO? ...where... Oh, you don't meet the float you wanted to get... And so, you decide, "Okay, we don't have enough to do the deal." And everybody gets their money back.

Its never happened in any bank that I know of.

Jason Goodman: Okay. Another that happened when I was doing [B]"Is Wall Street Bullish on Bitcoin", I went down there, because when I woke up in the morning, bitcoin was over $11,400 or something incredibly high. And when I was doing that Livestream, people on the stream were telling me that bitcoin crashed. And here's an article right here where it says bitcoin crashed... What this is talking about, of course, is this case the U.S. vs Coinbase, where the IRS successfully sued Coinbase, saying that they want private information about people who are buying or selling more that $20,000 worth of cryptocurrency on the Coinbase exchange, there.

What do you think about all this?

Clif High: It really muddies the water, legally. Because, the IRS has previously considered cryptocurrency to be a capital gains category commodity - not a currency. Now, they're starting to try & extend the Know your customer (KYC) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_your_customer) laws from banking over to the cryptocurrency exchanges, as though these were, in fact, currencies. Okay...

Jason Goodman: But isn't it suppose to a currency?

Clif High: No. The government says, 'No.' That these are not currencies. They don't want competition to their monopolistic offering of the dollar, correct. Right, they got a monopoly on the dollar currency, and they don't want it abrogated at all. And so they've always declared that cryptocurrencies were fine - go out & play all you want. But its like buying magic pumpkins out of a game for the next time play the game. Its a capital gain expenditure, right. Its a $400 million market. And that maket's been going on for 15 or 20 years in that level of activity. IRS has always treated that as a captial gains endeavor.

So now, it sounds like what they're trying to do with Coinbase is A) they're understanding how fast its changing - the whole fiat, the whole financial sector landscape underneath them that accounts for 18% of the U.S. economy, B) it sounds like they're trying to start thinking of these things as currencies, and C) it sounds like they've made a deal with Coinbase. And Coinbase, effectively said $20,000 is the limit - "We're not going to give you any information on the people that are below this." They've worked out a solution. Which I think is, again, muddying the waters, in terms of how we think about this. Because it seems as though a few years down the road, IRS will be considering these things to be actual currency. And it will be going through a kind of a Forex (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/09/forex-taxation-basics.asp) kind of an approach for taxation, as opposed to the straight capital gains comodity kind of a taxation. And this is going to be a big shift - is in fact a big shift - is in fact occurring now.

Actually, it doesn't bode very well for the government. Its going to drive them crazy trying to decide what amount can be taxed & what kind of transaction shift with cryptocurrency, is where you can have trading transaction that's settled... okay, unlike Wall Street - where nothing is settled since probably 1999 - there's been no actual trading of stock certificates, or bond certificates, or any of that. Everybody dumps everything that they buy on their 401k to a company called CEDE & Co. And this one individual owns all the stocks in the U.S. & it never settles, okay. So you never actually collect on any of the stock purchases or sales. You get fiat back occasionally. But these transactions settle - they're individually directed - so, they don't go through a 1099 reporting organization & its going to be just hellacious for the government to input all this level of tranaction from all these millions of people that are voluntarily tell them, "Well yeah, I traded a tenth of an ether & I got 115 Populous coins, and I traded 7 of those, and I got 50 of these, and 15,000 bim coins - that kind of a thing, right?

[Seems to me, this last thing that Clif has said is specifically why an A.I. quantum computer system would need to be an essential part of the cryptocurrency / blockchain equation - just saying, Clif. ]

:)
(Taking a break for now. Will come back later to transcribe more, as Clif gets to rambling on so quickly that its helpful to see what he says in a written form...)

[turiya]

More from Anthony Patch & Kev Baker...


Enochian Magic, Tesla 3, 6, 9 &
RESURRECTION Of The DEAD
(Apr 17, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwdc3NUy24E&t=3070s


Explained: “If you knew the magnificence of the three, six and nine, you would have a key to the universe.” – Nikola Tesla — Geometry of the Matrix is the Cube, while the “elite” employ the Sphere. Also, Enochian language and math in communications with Fallen Angels, it’s relevance to D-Wave’s development of quantum bits... FULL NOTES HERE.... http://www.kevbakershow.com/patch-tes... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=nwdc3NUy24E&event=video_description&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kevbakershow.com%2Fpatch-tesla-3-6-9-decoded%2F&redir_token=ml2FrSO6dfRJuQ6mrVbZhev-3M98MTUxMjM1MTM0OUAxNTEyMjY0OTQ5)


______________

By Kev Baker (http://www.kevbakershow.com/author/kevbaker/) on April 18, 2017 CERN (http://www.kevbakershow.com/category/science/cern/), Special Reports
(http://www.kevbakershow.com/category/special-reports/)

(http://www.kevbakershow.com/category/special-reports/) http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/tesla-702x335.jpg (http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/tesla.jpg)

ANTHONY PATCH BREAKS DOWN THE SECRETS OF TESLA 3, 6 & 9 AND EXPLAINS HOW IT TRULY IS THE KEY TO THE UNIVERSE.

The Anthony Patch Show… Episode#18.
In this episode of the Anthony Patch Show, Tony & Kev go over a number of topics and cover Tony’s most recent revelations!

We get into…. “If you knew the magnificence of the three, six and nine, you would have a key to the universe.” – Nikola Tesla — Geometry of the Matrix is the Cube, while the “elite” employ the Sphere.

Also, Enochian language and math in communications with Fallen Angels, it’s relevance to D-Wave’s development of quantum bits and computers. The goal revealed: Immortality through modification of DNA using the 3,6,9 of tetrahedrons and its spherical arrangement.

The video does have the relevant images that were used in the chatroom during the live show. Hopefully this will make it easier for the listener to understand just what is being said.

So, lets get into it....

TESSERACT VS TETRAHEDRONS…. THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX!

FROM ANTHONY PATCH….
What I am trying to convey is the fact that during the time of John Dee and Edward Kelley, the late 1500s, they were trying to describe geometric shapes using only their written language.

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ENOCHIAN-ALPHABET-1024x576.jpgEnochian Alphabet

They were not mathematicians in the sense of computing equations in order to describe a given geometric shape.

The Fallen Angels they were communicating with, used only letters because of their lack of formal education in math.

Both were highly intelligent and produced long descriptions of the geometry they were being given.

Where D-Wave comes into this is, they know all the math there is to know, at least for now.

Therefore, in communication with these same Fallen Angels, they at D-Wave can communicate purely mathematically.

The chipsets containing thousands of qubits are arranged as were the letters of the Enochian alphabet on the Great Tablet. Note the Tablet is divided into four smaller squares. This is the present-day, Quaternary programming of 5G WifFi. It is based upon 4, rather than 2. This is the superposition and supersymmetry in physical form/layout.

The cross in the center joins these 4 sections, forming first into a tesseract cube in 3D. Then, forming into the circular shield in 3D, a sphere. The end point is the 600.

The 600 is actually comprised of the Tree of Life. Several of them, when curved, forming the sphere, and one tree running directly up through its center.

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/T1-1024x576.jpg

This is the navigational chart for the Universe. This is how Fallen Angels travel and their lines of communications with humans on Earth.

Again, it all begins with the single tetrahedron. Where the Egyptians got stuck was with the cube. Therefore, the square-based pyramids, rather than a tetrahedronal pyramid. This is where Dee and Kelley got stuck. They could not describe using the Enochian alphabet, a 600 composed of tetrahedrons. It was just too complex for words.

Intuitively, Dee and Kelley understood the geometry, but could not compose the equations in describing beyond the basic Euclidean shapes based upon everyday observations of “nature” around them.

D-Wave first constructed qubits based upon the Enochian alphabet.

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/GREAT-TABLE-1-1024x576.jpg

Then, they received the Enochian mathematics, the algorithms, equations and Quaternary programming language. What I first coined as “Quaternary” programming using 0, 1, 3, 4 leaving out the 2 as being redundant within 4. Little did I know while composing Covert Catastrophe in late 2011.

Today, I am convinced they have moved from tesseract, to the shield (a filter of information), to the 600 of today.

Recall, I discovered an article from Cornell post-publication of Covert Catastrophe, proposing the arrangement of qubits as a tetrahedron. That is the smoking gun for the 600 as a quantum computer.

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/product_thumbnail.jpg (http://anthonypatch.com)

Having now a better understanding of their communication languages, including the math, I am even more convinced the Holy Spirit was revealing to me back in late 2011 not only their computer, but the true model of the Universe upon which it was configured and is now operating.

Remember from my Knoxville presentation. First, it had to be properly configured, matching that of the Universe. Then, tuning it by way of the proper number of qubits contained within this structure to tune it. They matched it to the CMB, Cosmic Microwave Background radiation wavelength.

D-Wave moved from simple Cartesian coordinates in building a computer based upon qubits, to one using Spherical Harmonics, the computational, therefore communication system processing numbers along both the surface of a sphere, and within its internal dimensions.

It is the combination of surface and internal configurations, therefore processing of information composed entirely of numbers arranged in a combinatorial programming language based upon 4, Quaternary.

If you look at the simple tetrahedron, how many surfaces and corners is its shape composed of?

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/1sub.png (http://truthfrequencyradio.com/amember/aff/go/kevbaker)

TESLA 3, 6 & 9.

Nikola Tesla was a Serbian-American inventor, electrical engineer, mechanical engineer, physicist, and futurist who is best known for his contributions to the design of the modern alternating current electricity supply system.

Tesla made a number of profound statements over the course of his life and one that stands out is the following….

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Tesla-3-6-9--702x336.jpg

In the days prior to the show, Tony Patch started to realise just what it was that Tesla was talking about. The image below hill hopefully allow you to follow the information Tony is relaying here…..

http://kevbakershow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/tesla-369-702x336.jpg3, 6 & 9 DECODED!


Count how many separate, straight lines there are here. Start at the peak of the pyramid, counting down the right side, using only the top, orange triangle. That is the first line. Keep doing this, using on that line that is part of an individual color.

Count each line. There are 9.

Now, count using only the “outside” lines forming the entire pyramid itself. 3.

Continue now to include the lines “inside” this larger, singular pyramid. Another 3.
If you add the 3 outside with the 3 inside lines = 6

Tesla was referring to the tetrahedron when he spoke of the 3, 6, 9.
It is the model of the Universe.

666 and the tetrahedron and parallel dimensions come from the tetrahedron.
6 straight edges. The edges are where parallel dimensions meet, come together, communicate with one another.

Given that a tetrahedron is 3-dimensional, not flat, you bring the 3s together, forming 666. Don’t know why I did not see this before. Maybe I did, but forgot until just now. Getting old. 666 forms into the 600-cell. Satan just steals what God creates.

More at this link (http://www.kevbakershow.com/patch-tesla-3-6-9-decoded/)

[norman]

Joseph Stigliz, the former chief economist of the World Bank, wants bitcoin banned.

https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-outlawed-economist-joseph-stiglitz-says/

"Bitcoin is successful only because of its potential for circumvention, lack of oversight," Joseph Stigliz, currently a professor at Columbia University, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television today, as the cryptocurrency reached new all-time highs this week.

However, Stiglitz, who also chaired the U.S. President's Council of Economic Advisers during the Clinton Administration, said he does support technological innovation in payments, but thinks digital money should still be fiat created and controlled by the government.


"Let’s move away from paper into the 21st century of a digital economy," he said.


Like many (https://www.coindesk.com/dr-doom-roubini-joins-wall-street-chorus-calling-bitcoin-bubble/) other (https://www.coindesk.com/dimon-breaks-vow-calls-bitcoin-buyers-stupid/) members (https://www.coindesk.com/credit-suisse-ceo-bitcoin-definition-bubble/) of the Davoisie (http://nws.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/newword_display_alpha.php?letter=D&last=80), Stiglitz – who won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2001 – called the run-up in bitcoin's price unjustified and unsustainable.


"It’s a bubble that’s going to give a lot of people a lot of exciting times as it rides up and then goes down," he said. "The value of a bitcoin today is expectations of what the bitcoin is going to be tomorrow."


And even though bitcoin is a decentralized network, with participants scattered around the globe, Stiglitz seemed to think Washington could easily nip it in the bud.

"If the government says 'the reason bitcoin is being used is circumvention,' they could close it down at any moment," he said. "And then it collapses."

[turiya]

Joseph Stigliz, the former chief economist of the World Bank, wants bitcoin banned.

https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-outlawed-economist-joseph-stiglitz-says/

"Bitcoin is successful only because of its potential for circumvention, lack of oversight," Joseph Stigliz, currently a professor at Columbia University, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television today, as the cryptocurrency reached new all-time highs this week.

However, Stiglitz, who also chaired the U.S. President's Council of Economic Advisers during the Clinton Administration, said he does support technological innovation in payments, but thinks digital money should still be fiat created and controlled by the government.


"Let’s move away from paper into the 21st century of a digital economy," he said.


Like many (https://www.coindesk.com/dr-doom-roubini-joins-wall-street-chorus-calling-bitcoin-bubble/) other (https://www.coindesk.com/dimon-breaks-vow-calls-bitcoin-buyers-stupid/) members (https://www.coindesk.com/credit-suisse-ceo-bitcoin-definition-bubble/) of the Davoisie (http://nws.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/newword_display_alpha.php?letter=D&last=80), Stiglitz – who won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2001 – called the run-up in bitcoin's price unjustified and unsustainable.


"It’s a bubble that’s going to give a lot of people a lot of exciting times as it rides up and then goes down," he said. "The value of a bitcoin today is expectations of what the bitcoin is going to be tomorrow."


And even though bitcoin is a decentralized network, with participants scattered around the globe, Stiglitz seemed to think Washington could easily nip it in the bud.

"If the government says 'the reason bitcoin is being used is circumvention,' they could close it down at any moment," he said. "And then it collapses."




Yes, Stigliz is declaring FUD - fear, uncertainty & doubt.

The bottomline is that he wants it regulated. He wants it controlled. And we all know by this time that this is what the bankers have an obsession with - Control over everything. Own everything. And I would bet dollars to doughnuts that this is where it is most certainly headed. It will be ultimately controlled... It is being ratcheted up to be the new monetary system as the dollar drops into oblivion.

Remember the 2008-9 bailout... The too big to fail. There was going to be chaos in the streets, there was going to be martial law declared if the banks weren't bailed out. And Congress bought it hook, line & sinker. Well, how did that turn out?

So yeah, its all about control. Going cashless - an electronic monetary system - and everything will be traceable. Its the old bait & switch. Right now its being sold as being outside the system. Its the carrot on a stick for all the donkeys that got their heads in a melt-down over the skyrocketing numbers relevant to the present cryptocurreny eruption. Its the carrot on the stick...

Lynette Zang calls it Perception Management... Lynette Zang is wanting to know what the IMF & the rest of the central bankers really got in mind for the rest of us....


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TJBbOM9LfCk/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/TJBbOM9LfCk?t=15m40s)

Lynette Zang: It has me question where people are really coming from in their conviction. Because if this is about money, if its about a money standard shift... Every single time people say, "This time its different." And frankly, it never is different.

Yes, the technology is more advanced. And yes, there are some advantages to the normal person with this. But they're huge advantages to the corporations. They're not spending all that time, and those billions & trillions of dollars on developing all of these blockchain technologies just to support their goal. (See the chart at the bottom.)

And the smart contracts, really? Have they read a smart contract. And you know, you brought something else up - is that they say, "you don't understand." Well, in the beginning of my quest in this - right. I didn't understand. But I read about it daily. I read from all different areas, not just one little narrow supporting crypto area. But I want to know what the IMF & the central bankers have in mind for us.

Because, they're not going to give up their power easily. And they've had a money monopoly forever.

And so, those that are declaring FUD - fear, uncertainty & doubt - is that they don't understand. And they are not paying attention to exactly what these central bankers have in mind.

And what I'm showing you now, is called a "money flower" from the BIS Report on central bank cryptocurrencies. You know they love it. But the interesting thing about it is they have coins - they have gold/silver - outside the system, completely decentralized as part of this. Everything else - all these other cryptocurrencies - whether they're central bank cryptocurrencies, or private cryptocurrencies - they've got some space in there for them as well.

But those still tie into the central banks.


https://www.enterprisetimes.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Money-flower-2.jpg

Originally, bitcoin was sold as being outside of the system & an alternative to fiat money.

Okay, how are you going to use bitcoin as an alternative to fiat money when you can't tell what the price is going to be from one day to the next, right? Its not even marginally stable. So is it really a dollar alternative? I'm thinking not.

Its not really bitcoin, its that blockchain technology. And there are some good things about, but there are also some dangerous things about it. And its not really money. Right now its hugely speculative. The government is taking a hands-off approach to it, because it benefits them in that "money flower" - in having everybody digital. Its got to rise. And btw, the stock market could go to 50,000, too.

But none of it is real! And its just numbers. And people get blinded by numbers. But there needs to be some utility in all of that, or what is its real value?

Sean: Regarding the de-centralization: Most of the people that have bought bitcoin have done so through accounts set up at places such as Coinbase. Have you seen how many new accounts have been set up at places such as Coinbase. I think they've opened up a million new accounts a month ago, or something.

Do you think for a second the IRS can't figure out & can't get the information of the people who opened those accounts?

There's no decentralization, in the sense that "Oh, I bought a bitcoin & I made a million dollars & then I sold it & its all tax free!"
Its not decentralized to the degree that the government doesn't know.

Lynette: Honestly. That's what that whole IMF Report is - its using this for taxation - but, not just because you sold the bitcoin. Its called "Life-time taxation". Its easy on this blockchain for them to accumulate every single transaction you've ever done, any of your earnings, your capital gains... Gosh, if all titles are held on blockchain... then, they know everything. And its easy to tax you. Because, its in their power to do so. Its in their power just to take it.

Here's another interesting chart on who & when the big corps have invested in cryptos...


http://mmbiz.qpic.cn/mmbiz_jpg/YvhCvnnFNOiaEniaQ0VgO0EYibpBq4fJwwvjic8KWxLUOrTiahX3YDZiccwaYeIwn08ujTbrC2JDMzicETHxJAg21uwwg/640?wx_fmt=jpeg (https://www.cbinsights.com/research/financial-services-corporate-blockchain-investments/)

[turiya]

Anthony Patch - Objective of Artificial Intelligence
Explained on The Hagmann Report "
(11/27/17)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnmUeOexbD8&t=2193s

TRANSCRIPTION

Anthony Patch: We are going through a process in the present moment of transformation & augmentation of our bodies & specifically of our minds - And our minds are quantum computers.

I've done quite a bit of research in so far as looking at the structure of the human mind & the DNA from the particle physic perspective. And, quite literally, we do operate as a quantum computer.

Now, I give you that as a background because what Satan is doing is counterfeiting. He cannot create anything new. He can only counterfeit what God has created.

A.I. in quantum computing is a counterfeit of the human mind. If you look into A.I., if you look into the mechanics of quantum computers, its quite obvious that they're studying the human mind. You've heard of the mapping of the human mind -- much like the mapping of the human genome. This is all an effort to understand the structure & the pattern, but to model that, to create a model of the human mind & of the human DNA, literally beginning at the quantum scale & building up, whether you're speaking of human DNA or the human neurons of the brain.

You will hear things in A.I. like recursive neural network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_neural_network). That is a patterned model of the arrangement of neurons - not only the creation of artificial neurons, but the pattern of those & how they are connected by the dendrites in our minds. And therefore, this is a replacement on the part of Satan of what God created, meaning the human race. For, Satan hates everything that is of God. And we are the Temple of the Holy Spirit. And we are created by God, as is the entire Universe. So therefore, understanding that as a basic structure for what is going on today, that there is a massive counterfeit operation underway.

Then, we can understand better what the impact of A.I. and what is behind it - quantum computers - has to do with our everyday walk of life. Specifically, our daily life, our walk - whether its with Jesus, or outside of that. And, this is where we're going to. And that is the battle of souls. If we are not with Jesus Christ, if we have not made that choice between the light & the dark - those that have not chosen to go with Jesus Christ, are doomed.

A.I., and the quantum computing system that drive A.I., are the beast system that is spoken of in Revelation. And I am going to give you just a couple of headlines, here, of my own. And that is that A.I. is not only driven by quantum computing systems, but it is also having its IQ raised. It is being taught by the internet of everything - the internet of things - as it is more properly known. But the advent of cryptocurrencies is the 'mark of the beast' system. Cryptocurrencies serve to raise the IQ of A.I.

Now, there are many stratifications of A.I., very basic applications of it - like what you would find in your smart phone - all the way to the 'leading edge', or what I call the 'tip of the spear'. That has to do with specifically quantum computers - at that level. That's the level I wish to address with you tonight. This is an existential threat to the human race, according to people like Elon Musk & Dr. Stephen Hawking.

So, that's my foundation. And I'll be happy to take any questions.

Doug Hagmann: A couple of things that you've said... Technology is a tool of Satan. I believe technology can be used for goog, but certainly, in this case, its being used as really the architecture for the beast system, or it is the beast & and will be used as the system of the beast - I believe that.

One thing I don't quite understand... Let's assume that you & I are just talking to me with limited knowledge. Artificial Intelligence is basically... how does it even operate on the internet, for example. And is it responsible... for example, I will do a search. Let's say, I'm looking for an office chair. And, I will get a bunch of results. But every ad thereafter is a picture of a chair for an office. Is that an example of Artificial Intelligence is? Or, is that something much more basic? Are we looking at something much greater & much deeper than that?

Anthony Patch: That is an algorithm. That's a very basic, simple mathematical instruction. And what it is doing is it is observing the behavior of humans, be it through searches, facial recognition, observing our environment in which we operate in. An application you may consider would be would be the autonomous vehicle operation, in which AI learns by observing a human operating a vehicle.

AI is nothing more than algorithms of instructions. Now, they get very complex at higher levels. But yes, in terms of directing ads to you? Absolutely. That is a very rudimentary, what is known as General Artificial Intelligence (https://www.popsci.com/narrow-and-general-ai) program.

Doug Hagmann: Okay. That's the most basic example. But now, we're seeing this push of sex dolls. And these animated human-like sex dolls. That's the more sophisticated aspect of AI. Am I correct to say that they learn from the input they receive from the human being?

Anthony Patch: My purpose here is to not trip you up, or to confuse the audience, or anything else. So, if I make corrections, or additions, it isn't because I'm trying to sound like a know-it-all, or that I know everything.

But I will tell you from my standpoint, when we look at things like Sophia, which was just granted citizenship status in Saudi Arabia. That's a robot. That's an AI robot.

'Sophia' in Greek translates to 'wisdom'. Even that is not the top level of AI capabilities. But it is certainly near that leading edge. So, I'll take you all the way to the leading edge. The leading edge of it actually has to do with communicating with the other side. This is a communication tool that operates through dimensional information gateways. And I'll back that up later. I'm just giving you the highlights.

At the leading level, AI is in direct communication with the other side, with demonic entities, with Satan himself. And that sounds preposterous. But I do the research - both ancient & modern - to back that up. This is a communication tool that is live, right now, that is receiving information - and I'll define that later - from the other side, and is in direct control.

Now, to back that up, what I will let you know is that.... At the highest levels of AI, when scientists & programmers or engineers are questioned as to explaining how is the AI operating at these highest levels - not with your smart phone & not even with the Sophia robot example - but how is AI arriving at its decisions, at its answers, at its decisions, at its conclusions? And they are at a loss to explain it.

And this is public information. They publicly acknowledge that they do not how the AI, internally, is operating at this point. The reason for that, what has caused that is that the AI has moved into not only recursive neural network, which means a sort of never-ending process - a closed loop of learning - where the AI is teaching itself. But it has moved into what is called " deep machine learning (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ADeep_learning) " - deep computer learning- where the AI is self-correcting. It is able to take in with deep machine learning, or deep neural network learning (https://sigai.acm.org/static/aimatters/3-3/AIMatters-3-3-06-Neller.pdf). It is taking in larger 'batches', as they call it - larger batches of information - than was found in, what was called, the recursive neural network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_neural_network).

So at the deep-level, we're talking about an operating system that is operating autonomously in its gather of information, processing & self-learning. Autonomous from human input & control. And as I said, from any ability by humans now to discern & describe what AI is actually doing internally. So there's a nutshell overview.

Doug Hagmann: So, if I am hearing you correctly, the people behind this Artificial Intelligence don't even understand, or claim, not to understand how it works. And you're saying that there's a trans-dimensional aspect of this, by virtue of the fact that this system being able to communicate with demonic forces? As crazy as that sounds, I kind of understand it... Is that what your saying?

Anthony Patch: It is absolutely what I'm saying. And again, there is an awful lot of detail behind these statements. But I will say this, the origins of computing, binary computing - zeros & ones - and its growth all the way to the present time in AI, the roots of AI, and all of computing comes from Geomancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomancy) & Necromancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necromancy). Necromancy is communicating with the dead. Geomancy is doing the same thing through a process of divination - divining the meaning of random marks in the soil. A person providing imprints in the soil on a random basis, or casting of stones & sticks on the ground - hence, geomancy.

And then, one who is practiced and trained in the arts of divining or interpreting these seemingly random associations of marks in the soil, or sticks that are used, or stones that are used. That divination process is a process of communicating with the spirits. If you look at the written record of geomancy within the Bible, and also in the secret organizations, the secret societies, we can often cite an example which is the Freemasons - the Masons practice geomancy.

So, if were are looking at the basis for binary communication, binary computing, as being derived from geomancy - communicating with the other side - then we understand with the more sophisticated application of quantum computers, which by the statement of one of the co-founders of D-Wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems), Geordie Rose (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU), publicly stated in 2013 - the video is out there - he said that they are accessing 2 to the 500th power of parallel dimensions. And they are extracting resources from the other side. That's information.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU
Now that was with the 512 model @ 512 cubits. This year they sold a 2000 cubit model the 2000Q. They're now communicating with 2 to the 2000th power of parallel dimensions - according to Geordie Rose's own statement.

So, you see the connection between the ancient practice - even shown in the Bible with geomancy, which relates to Daniel - all the way to the present time, in which the same system of binary geomantic (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/geomantic) derived mathematical processing, which results in algorithms. And the algorithms drive, not only D-Wave, as the processing system, as the nuts & bolts mechanics of it, but the AI programming of those algorithms, in the process of teaching itself .

Now, I take a step further & go beyond just calling it 'teaching itself' to say, it is connected through the 2 to the 2000th power of parallel dimensions to the other side, and therefore, in real time is receiving instructions & information on what it is to do in our reality.

And I'll stop there....

Doug Hagmann: You would stop there, right? Okay, I'm still struggling over the term 'geomancy'. But when you look up the term 'geomancy', I never heard that term before. But when you go back & look at the origins of this word, the Arabic term - the science of the sand, for example.

So now, when you bring it forward to today, there's alot to talk about in there. Pardon me for even sounding as simple as I am. But when you start connecting the dots, here, we're looking at an ancient system that is implemented through computers.

Anthony Patch: Absolutely.

When we look at the mathematics involved. There's a little more advanced form of binary - 0's & 1's - that we need to take into account. There's another form of mathematics beyond 0 & 1, which is called balanced ternary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary). And that is three numbers. And that is -1, 0 & +1. This is what AI is using. They are struggling in AI to quaternary level which is utilizing 4 numbers. The point here is that its more than just binary. And the complexity can be best conceptualized in a geometric way.

So, let me give you a little bit of history...
Back in the 1590's, in Europe we had Dee & Kelly. We had Edward Kelly & John Dee who were practitioners of geomancy & necromancy - they were alchemists. They communicated with the fallen angels. They received both an alphabet & numerical representations - algorithms - numbers that prescribe geometric shapes. Those shapes were intended for the use of arranging the elements - the base elements - such that you could change lead into gold. Its an alchemical process.

What you're talking about, here, is the ability to communicate using both a written language - an alphabet - as well as a communication language. This is something that Aleister Crowley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley) also took on.

Now, I will give you a touchpoint, because many people are familiar with Crowley & his work. He has a square - a square tablet that is divided by a cross in the center into 4 quadrants. Within that 4 quadrant arrangement (in a square) can be the alphabet or the numbers that he received, much like Dee & Kelly did, from this mystical practice - this dark part of geomancy, as well as necromancy. There are actually about 7 different forms of "mancy" - there's aquamancy, areomancy, spatulamancy....

So, using these systems & these tools of communication with parallel dimensions, they were able to manipulate the elements.

And that is what this whole thing is about. It's about creating a new reality - call it, terraforming the planet - its changing the actual physical structure of our reality, while at the same time - trying to create a new human 2.0 - a new race of beings.

Now again, it sounds preposterous. But when you look at what their agenda is... When you look at the historical record, you look at Biblical scripture, you look at the technology today in which they are literally, for example, with the DNA, able to create a biological life-form in the computer - what I call ' In Silico-DNA (http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/dna_hybridization/about.html) ' - model it in a computer, and then output it into a biological printer, a bio-printer. Not creating life, but creating a life-form from an existing life-form - a modification.

This is all in the literature, its all in the peer-review papers, its all in the journals. None of what I am stating is science fiction.

When you look at their agenda in DNA, and you look at the agenda in quantum computing, which has its roots not only in geomancy, but in particle physics & quantum mechanics, then you see that they have in place today the tools to accomplish what they've set out to do for hundreds of years. And essentially, that is to destroy what God has created - be it the Earth, our environment & the human race.

Now, this is not fear-mongering. This is not to scare people. I am saying, this is what Satan is pushing for. But God already has a line pre-defined in the sand. You may want to call it his form of geomancy - but he's drawn a line in the sand. And he's not going to allow Satan to achieve these goals - of completely changing the Earth, and completely doing away with His creation, and going to human 2.0. And this is why we move into the Book of Revelation, and we see what unfolds in terms of Judgment.

Now that first Judgment was by water with the flood. This time, as we know, it's the burning of the elements. The reason its the burning of the elements, is because literally, at the quantum scale, the elements through the alchemic processes of today are being manipulated & are being changed. And this is going to be a clean-slate approach.

The good news, for those that are indwelt with the Holy spirit, is what I quoted from Jesus himself in John 14:12 that we will do greater works than even Jesus Christ. We will be transformed - and, its happening now, and augmented, in our minds, to stay ahead of - not abreast, not equal to, but several steps ahead of Satan's agenda.

If we speak about DNA, the Holy spirit, the full armor of God protects our DNA from these changes. If we're talking about our minds - our quantum computers - they also are protected from these changes that Satan is trying to push on us.

So, what does this translate to, what does it mean for us. It means, we can expect to see - significant enhancements in our mental & physical capabilities. I'm not talking about superman. I'm just saying, the pushing of the envelop in DNA research & in quantum computing & A.I. advances, realize that God is already well ahead of what they are saying are "marvelous wonders & works" in their scientific advancements with DNA & A.I.

Don't be afraid of A.I. Because, it will never even equal the human mind. I'm not talking about computational abilities, where you're talking about running mathematical formulae. I'm talking about our consciousness & our soul. It will never achieve consciousness at the level of a human. And certainly, it will never have a soul of its own.

And, I'll stop there.

[turiya]

Gil Scot Heron.... Max Keiser Report...


Gil Scott-Heron - 'I'm New Here'
(official video)
(Jun 2, 2010)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV_astp3BjM_____________

Keiser Report: Hyper-bitconization (E1158)
(Dec 5, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbJ44BLxjGo

[Noelle]

An AI god to help improve society?

Fox News published this article today: Former Google and Uber engineer is developing an AI 'god' (http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/12/06/former-google-and-uber-engineer-is-developing-ai-god.html)

Excerpt:

An AI could write a bible for how to live and expect humans to become subservient. It’s one reason Elon Musk has decried the dangers of AI, saying superintelligence is more dangerous than North Korean nukes. Musk has slammed the concept of an AI ‘god’.

Nonetheless, AI is clearly extending its reach into society. A podcaster named Rose Eveleth helped create an algorithm that wrote an AI bible gathered from sacred writings. It’s a remarkable exercise, even though the result is mostly gibberish. Whether that really matters is open to debate, according to the experts.

“An AI would provide the equivalent of a ‘Messiah’ -- having many orders of magnitude more processing elements than the brain, enabling it to gift us with solutions to the most daunting social, political, economic, and environmental challenges,” says Dr. Stephen Thaler, the President and CEO of Imagination Engines who is an AI and consciousness expert.

[turiya]

An AI god to help improve society?

Fox News published this article today: Former Google and Uber engineer is developing an AI 'god' (http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/12/06/former-google-and-uber-engineer-is-developing-ai-god.html)

Excerpt:

An AI could write a bible for how to live and expect humans to become subservient. It’s one reason Elon Musk has decried the dangers of AI, saying superintelligence is more dangerous than North Korean nukes. Musk has slammed the concept of an AI ‘god’.

Nonetheless, AI is clearly extending its reach into society. A podcaster named Rose Eveleth helped create an algorithm that wrote an AI bible gathered from sacred writings. It’s a remarkable exercise, even though the result is mostly gibberish. Whether that really matters is open to debate, according to the experts.

“An AI would provide the equivalent of a ‘Messiah’ -- having many orders of magnitude more processing elements than the brain, enabling it to gift us with solutions to the most daunting social, political, economic, and environmental challenges,” says Dr. Stephen Thaler, the President and CEO of Imagination Engines who is an AI and consciousness expert.

Thanks, LadyM.
Yes, Anthony Patch has addressed the notion to the degree that A.I. may certainly do mathematical calculations better & faster than the human, but it will never reach the heights of a human being possessing a soul.

Anthony Patch:

Don't be afraid of A.I. Because, it will never even equal the human mind. I'm not talking about computational abilities, where you're talking about running mathematical formulae. I'm talking about our consciousness & our soul. It will never achieve consciousness at the level of a human. And certainly, it will never have a soul of its own.

So yes, to a certain degree man is like a robot when it comes to the intellect. That's what the intellect of the mind is good at. Its good at calculating, dissecting, analysing things that are brought in front of it. It can store ready-made answers to situations that repeat themselves.

But, man is much more that just having an intellect. Intellect doens't mean the same as intelligence, imo. In fact, for me, the two-word term "Artificial Intelligence" is a misnomer. A.I. should really refer to what can be called an Artificial Intellect. Oh sure, the dictionary will say intellect & intelligence mean the same. But not really, imo. Because Human Intelligence has a soul that is behind it.

A.I. is incapable of dealing absolutely 'new' - never before experienced situations - it cannot act spontaneously, but only in a kind of knee-jerk fashion as its been programmed to do.

[FreeURmind]

.........

Pssst. ...

They were talking A.I on the Q thread.

Connection?

[turiya]

PROOF: WALL STREET WILL COLLUDE
TO TRY TO DESTROY BITCOIN [& GOLD]
(Dec 5, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCbRBJzbHhE

From the Description section:

Tuesday, December 5th provided yet more hard evidence of Wall Street's epic criminality, first came another $1.5 BILLION in notional gold thrown as the market to bring the price down to 4-month lows, while at the same exact time, Wall Street shorts dragged GBTC, the over the counter BTC fund, down 25% intraday while the actual price of BTC was up nearly 5% all day long. It's more proof that not only can Wall Street NOT be trusted, the criminals on the Street would LOVE to destroy the free market in Bitcoin through the Bitcoin futures market which launches December 10th.
_____________

Bitcoin Futures And The Need For Control (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-05/bitcoin-futures-and-need-control) - ZeroHedge

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/fp_thumb/images/user3303/imageroot/20171205_btc.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-05/bitcoin-futures-and-need-control)
"So, don’t think for a minute that the CME or the CBOE are implementing Bitcoin futures for our benefit or simply because they want a cut of the action. No, they are doing so because they see the existential threat to their business and are moving to defend it by becoming part of the action."

Dec 5, 2017 2:37 PM


Gold Breaks Below Key Support, Drops To 4-Month Lows (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-05/gold-breaks-below-key-support-drops-4-month-lows) -- ZeroHedge

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/fp_thumb/images/user3303/imageroot/20171205_gold4.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-05/gold-breaks-below-key-support-drops-4-month-lows)
At 0907ET, someone decided it was the perfect time to dump $1.5 billion notional worth of gold, smashing the precious metal below its 200-day moving-average and back down to 4-month lows...

Dec 5, 2017 11:04 AM

[FreeURmind]

..................

[Noelle]

Anthony Patch - Objective of Artificial Intelligence
Explained on The Hagmann Report "
(11/27/17)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnmUeOexbD8&t=2193s

TRANSCRIPTION

Anthony Patch: We are going through a process in the present moment of transformation & augmentation of our bodies & specifically of our minds - And our minds are quantum computers.

I've done quite a bit of research in so far as looking at the structure of the human mind & the DNA from the particle physic perspective. And, quite literally, we do operate as a quantum computer.

Now, I give you that as a background because what Satan is doing is counterfeiting. He cannot create anything new. He can only counterfeit what God has created.

A.I. in quantum computing is a counterfeit of the human mind. If you look into A.I., if you look into the mechanics of quantum computers, its quite obvious that they're studying the human mind. You've heard of the mapping of the human mind -- much like the mapping of the human genome. This is all an effort to understand the structure & the pattern, but to model that, to create a model of the human mind & of the human DNA, literally beginning at the quantum scale & building up, whether you're speaking of human DNA or the human neurons of the brain.

You will hear things in A.I. like recursive neural network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_neural_network). That is a patterned model of the arrangement of neurons - not only the creation of artificial neurons, but the pattern of those & how they are connected by the dendrites in our minds. And therefore, this is a replacement on the part of Satan of what God created, meaning the human race. For, Satan hates everything that is of God. And we are the Temple of the Holy Spirit. And we are created by God, as is the entire Universe. So therefore, understanding that as a basic structure for what is going on today, that there is a massive counterfeit operation underway.

Then, we can understand better what the impact of A.I. and what is behind it - quantum computers - has to do with our everyday walk of life. Specifically, our daily life, our walk - whether its with Jesus, or outside of that. And, this is where we're going to. And that is the battle of souls. If we are not with Jesus Christ, if we have not made that choice between the light & the dark - those that have not chosen to go with Jesus Christ, are doomed.

A.I., and the quantum computing system that drive A.I., are the beast system that is spoken of in Revelation. And I am going to give you just a couple of headlines, here, of my own. And that is that A.I. is not only driven by quantum computing systems, but it is also having its IQ raised. It is being taught by the internet of everything - the internet of things - as it is more properly known. But the advent of cryptocurrencies is the 'mark of the beast' system. Cryptocurrencies serve to raise the IQ of A.I.

Now, there are many stratifications of A.I., very basic applications of it - like what you would find in your smart phone - all the way to the 'leading edge', or what I call the 'tip of the spear'. That has to do with specifically quantum computers - at that level. That's the level I wish to address with you tonight. This is an existential threat to the human race, according to people like Elon Musk & Dr. Stephen Hawking.

So, that's my foundation. And I'll be happy to take any questions.

Doug Hagmann: A couple of things that you've said... Technology is a tool of Satan. I believe technology can be used for goog, but certainly, in this case, its being used as really the architecture for the beast system, or it is the beast & and will be used as the system of the beast - I believe that.

One thing I don't quite understand... Let's assume that you & I are just talking to me with limited knowledge. Artificial Intelligence is basically... how does it even operate on the internet, for example. And is it responsible... for example, I will do a search. Let's say, I'm looking for an office chair. And, I will get a bunch of results. But every ad thereafter is a picture of a chair for an office. Is that an example of Artificial Intelligence is? Or, is that something much more basic? Are we looking at something much greater & much deeper than that?

Anthony Patch: That is an algorithm. That's a very basic, simple mathematical instruction. And what it is doing is it is observing the behavior of humans, be it through searches, facial recognition, observing our environment in which we operate in. An application you may consider would be would be the autonomous vehicle operation, in which AI learns by observing a human operating a vehicle.

AI is nothing more than algorithms of instructions. Now, they get very complex at higher levels. But yes, in terms of directing ads to you? Absolutely. That is a very rudimentary, what is known as General Artificial Intelligence (https://www.popsci.com/narrow-and-general-ai) program.

Doug Hagmann: Okay. That's the most basic example. But now, we're seeing this push of sex dolls. And these animated human-like sex dolls. That's the more sophisticated aspect of AI. Am I correct to say that they learn from the input they receive from the human being?

Anthony Patch: My purpose here is to not trip you up, or to confuse the audience, or anything else. So, if I make corrections, or additions, it isn't because I'm trying to sound like a know-it-all, or that I know everything.

But I will tell you from my standpoint, when we look at things like Sophia, which was just granted citizenship status in Saudi Arabia. That's a robot. That's an AI robot.

'Sophia' in Greek translates to 'wisdom'. Even that is not the top level of AI capabilities. But it is certainly near that leading edge. So, I'll take you all the way to the leading edge. The leading edge of it actually has to do with communicating with the other side. This is a communication tool that operates through dimensional information gateways. And I'll back that up later. I'm just giving you the highlights.

At the leading level, AI is in direct communication with the other side, with demonic entities, with Satan himself. And that sounds preposterous. But I do the research - both ancient & modern - to back that up. This is a communication tool that is live, right now, that is receiving information - and I'll define that later - from the other side, and is in direct control.

Now, to back that up, what I will let you know is that.... At the highest levels of AI, when scientists & programmers or engineers are questioned as to explaining how is the AI operating at these highest levels - not with your smart phone & not even with the Sophia robot example - but how is AI arriving at its decisions, at its answers, at its decisions, at its conclusions? And they are at a loss to explain it.

And this is public information. They publicly acknowledge that they do not how the AI, internally, is operating at this point. The reason for that, what has caused that is that the AI has moved into not only recursive neural network, which means a sort of never-ending process - a closed loop of learning - where the AI is teaching itself. But it has moved into what is called " deep machine learning (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ADeep_learning) " - deep computer learning- where the AI is self-correcting. It is able to take in with deep machine learning, or deep neural network learning (https://sigai.acm.org/static/aimatters/3-3/AIMatters-3-3-06-Neller.pdf). It is taking in larger 'batches', as they call it - larger batches of information - than was found in, what was called, the recursive neural network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_neural_network).

So at the deep-level, we're talking about an operating system that is operating autonomously in its gather of information, processing & self-learning. Autonomous from human input & control. And as I said, from any ability by humans now to discern & describe what AI is actually doing internally. So there's a nutshell overview.

Doug Hagmann: So, if I am hearing you correctly, the people behind this Artificial Intelligence don't even understand, or claim, not to understand how it works. And you're saying that there's a trans-dimensional aspect of this, by virtue of the fact that this system being able to communicate with demonic forces? As crazy as that sounds, I kind of understand it... Is that what your saying?

Anthony Patch: It is absolutely what I'm saying. And again, there is an awful lot of detail behind these statements. But I will say this, the origins of computing, binary computing - zeros & ones - and its growth all the way to the present time in AI, the roots of AI, and all of computing comes from Geomancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomancy) & Necromancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necromancy). Necromancy is communicating with the dead. Geomancy is doing the same thing through a process of divination - divining the meaning of random marks in the soil. A person providing imprints in the soil on a random basis, or casting of stones & sticks on the ground - hence, geomancy.

And then, one who is practiced and trained in the arts of divining or interpreting these seemingly random associations of marks in the soil, or sticks that are used, or stones that are used. That divination process is a process of communicating with the spirits. If you look at the written record of geomancy within the Bible, and also in the secret organizations, the secret societies, we can often cite an example which is the Freemasons - the Masons practice geomancy.

So, if were are looking at the basis for binary communication, binary computing, as being derived from geomancy - communicating with the other side - then we understand with the more sophisticated application of quantum computers, which by the statement of one of the co-founders of D-Wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems), Geordie Rose (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU), publicly stated in 2013 - the video is out there - he said that they are accessing 2 to the 500th power of parallel dimensions. And they are extracting resources from the other side. That's information.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU
Now that was with the 512 model @ 512 cubits. This year they sold a 2000 cubit model the 2000Q. They're now communicating with 2 to the 2000th power of parallel dimensions - according to Geordie Rose's own statement.

So, you see the connection between the ancient practice - even shown in the Bible with geomancy, which relates to Daniel - all the way to the present time, in which the same system of binary geomantic (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/geomantic) derived mathematical processing, which results in algorithms. And the algorithms drive, not only D-Wave, as the processing system, as the nuts & bolts mechanics of it, but the AI programming of those algorithms, in the process of teaching itself .

Now, I take a step further & go beyond just calling it 'teaching itself' to say, it is connected through the 2 to the 2000th power of parallel dimensions to the other side, and therefore, in real time is receiving instructions & information on what it is to do in our reality.

And I'll stop there....

Doug Hagmann: You would stop there, right? Okay, I'm still struggling over the term 'geomancy'. But when you look up the term 'geomancy', I never heard that term before. But when you go back & look at the origins of this word, the Arabic term - the science of the sand, for example.

So now, when you bring it forward to today, there's alot to talk about in there. Pardon me for even sounding as simple as I am. But when you start connecting the dots, here, we're looking at an ancient system that is implemented through computers.

Anthony Patch: Absolutely.

When we look at the mathematics involved. There's a little more advanced form of binary - 0's & 1's - that we need to take into account. There's another form of mathematics beyond 0 & 1, which is called balanced ternary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary). And that is three numbers. And that is -1, 0 & +1. This is what AI is using. They are struggling in AI to quaternary level which is utilizing 4 numbers. The point here is that its more than just binary. And the complexity can be best conceptualized in a geometric way.

So, let me give you a little bit of history...
Back in the 1590's, in Europe we had Dee & Kelly. We had Edward Kelly & John Dee who were practitioners of geomancy & necromancy - they were alchemists. They communicated with the fallen angels. They received both an alphabet & numerical representations - algorithms - numbers that prescribe geometric shapes. Those shapes were intended for the use of arranging the elements - the base elements - such that you could change lead into gold. Its an alchemical process.

What you're talking about, here, is the ability to communicate using both a written language - an alphabet - as well as a communication language. This is something that Aleister Crowley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley) also took on.

Now, I will give you a touchpoint, because many people are familiar with Crowley & his work. He has a square - a square tablet that is divided by a cross in the center into 4 quadrants. Within that 4 quadrant arrangement (in a square) can be the alphabet or the numbers that he received, much like Dee & Kelly did, from this mystical practice - this dark part of geomancy, as well as necromancy. There are actually about 7 different forms of "mancy" - there's aquamancy, areomancy, spatulamancy....

So, using these systems & these tools of communication with parallel dimensions, they were able to manipulate the elements.

And that is what this whole thing is about. It's about creating a new reality - call it, terraforming the planet - its changing the actual physical structure of our reality, while at the same time - trying to create a new human 2.0 - a new race of beings.

Now again, it sounds preposterous. But when you look at what their agenda is... When you look at the historical record, you look at Biblical scripture, you look at the technology today in which they are literally, for example, with the DNA, able to create a biological life-form in the computer - what I call ' In Silico-DNA (http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/dna_hybridization/about.html) ' - model it in a computer, and then output it into a biological printer, a bio-printer. Not creating life, but creating a life-form from an existing life-form - a modification.

This is all in the literature, its all in the peer-review papers, its all in the journals. None of what I am stating is science fiction.

When you look at their agenda in DNA, and you look at the agenda in quantum computing, which has its roots not only in geomancy, but in particle physics & quantum mechanics, then you see that they have in place today the tools to accomplish what they've set out to do for hundreds of years. And essentially, that is to destroy what God has created - be it the Earth, our environment & the human race.

Now, this is not fear-mongering. This is not to scare people. I am saying, this is what Satan is pushing for. But God already has a line pre-defined in the sand. You may want to call it his form of geomancy - but he's drawn a line in the sand. And he's not going to allow Satan to achieve these goals - of completely changing the Earth, and completely doing away with His creation, and going to human 2.0. And this is why we move into the Book of Revelation, and we see what unfolds in terms of Judgment.

Now that first Judgment was by water with the flood. This time, as we know, it's the burning of the elements. The reason its the burning of the elements, is because literally, at the quantum scale, the elements through the alchemic processes of today are being manipulated & are being changed. And this is going to be a clean-slate approach.

The good news, for those that are indwelt with the Holy spirit, is what I quoted from Jesus himself in John 14:12 that we will do greater works than even Jesus Christ. We will be transformed - and, its happening now, and augmented, in our minds, to stay ahead of - not abreast, not equal to, but several steps ahead of Satan's agenda.

If we speak about DNA, the Holy spirit, the full armor of God protects our DNA from these changes. If we're talking about our minds - our quantum computers - they also are protected from these changes that Satan is trying to push on us.

So, what does this translate to, what does it mean for us. It means, we can expect to see - significant enhancements in our mental & physical capabilities. I'm not talking about superman. I'm just saying, the pushing of the envelop in DNA research & in quantum computing & A.I. advances, realize that God is already well ahead of what they are saying are "marvelous wonders & works" in their scientific advancements with DNA & A.I.

Don't be afraid of A.I. Because, it will never even equal the human mind. I'm not talking about computational abilities, where you're talking about running mathematical formulae. I'm talking about our consciousness & our soul. It will never achieve consciousness at the level of a human. And certainly, it will never have a soul of its own.

And, I'll stop there.

This couldn't make more sense. I share in your viewpoint.

I simplify it by saying the war is

Organic vs Inorganic
Genetically Modified vs natural state

You even hit on alchemy, which isn't discussed a whole lot.

In my humble opinion your piece is very well done and couldn't be more spot on. It is very refreshing to see somebody use their own thoughts to connect obvious dots, instead of just posting random links to articles with no free thought on said articles. I thank you for this peice. It's what I have been trying to say also. Whoever "they" are. They need technology to do the things we can do naturally. May a divine entity help them when we tap into it. :)

The war is for our minds.

Sorry if I offended you for posting the Fox News piece. I thought of only sharing something that may be of interest to this thread. :sun: My opinion on AI is still in the development stage, so I dare not pretend that I know anything with certainty regarding the bigger AI picture.

My initial response to the Fox News article that I posted -- coming from what I have learned about simulated and programmed reality theories -- was more of a wondering if a highly evolved AI -- soul-less or not -- runs our reality and has from the start.

Based on the transcript of the Patch interview above (I plan to watch the video today), I see some alignment with the works of researchers like Robert Stanley and Wes Penre.

Don't be afraid of A.I. Because, it will never even equal the human mind. I'm not talking about computational abilities, where you're talking about running mathematical formulae. I'm talking about our consciousness & our soul. It will never achieve consciousness at the level of a human. And certainly, it will never have a soul of its own.

Though my understanding of AI is still budding, I've learned and experienced quite a bit on the nature of consciousness. With that said, I agree with the quote above. And I am not afraid.:cool:

[Foxie Loxie]

Hooray for you, LadyM! :star::star: I find it helpful to remember we come from outside this matrix & it has no control over us unless we allow it! However....it took me a lifetime to learn that!! :sherlock: Thanks, Bill!! :highfive:

[FreeURmind]

.................

[FreeURmind]

..............

[petra]

An AI god to help improve society?

That happened in a sci fi book I read called The Man Who Awoke (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Awoke) (initially published in 1933)

Without spoiling too much, the AI was called "The Brain" and once it figured out it didn't need people, things started to go down hill from there. That Era is really only 1/5 of the book.

After the Brain had been dealt with, in the next era people programmed their choice of dreams and sleeping their lives away, very matrix-esque.

[Noelle]

Noooo Lady M not at all. I edited it before reading your response. That whole delivery thing lol. It was not intended for you or anybody just a general observation aboard the internet of perceptions and opinions train.

Reading stuff like Anthony Patch makes sense too me, it looks at a broader picture rather than compartmentalizing each. I mean there is more to add to his works as the Web is intricate.

Besides, reading your comment lends me to believe you have a unique and greater understanding. A.I could be likened to the Ying of your yang.

Nature consciouness. Love it. I'm gonna steal that and use it lol If you make it past the development stage, send me a ticket. Been here for a while.

I don't know the whole A.I picture either. 😊 Not sure many do.

My aplogies for poor delivery in my first post.

Well then, A.I is attacking my responses 😂😂😂😂😂 kidding. I don't know why it posted that. I didn't okay it. Oh well. Another day of looking crazy.

My apologies to you too for mistaking your words. But all is good.:heart:

Yes, I can see me being in the understanding-development stage for a while. Save for my laptop, I don't have "computers" in my background. There a lot of concepts and terms to work through and digest.

Funny you saying that AI is attacking your responses. Sometimes I think that when I see not-so-kind or "dive-bombing" posts in Avalon threads. :bigsmile:

[Spiral]

Geordie Rose in his own words Tsunami of Demons is coming

If you watch ONE youtube all year it should be this one !!!


iJQkwnkNSPc

This is full disclosure, this lays ALL "theories" to rest. In his own words Geordie Rose Explains what is happening in the background. A Tsunami of demons or "old ones" is set to inhabit an army of"AI". powers and principalities.

[petra]

Geordie Rose in his own words Tsunami of Demons is coming

If you watch ONE youtube all year it should be this one !!!

This is full disclosure, this lays ALL "theories" to rest. In his own words Geordie Rose Explains what is happening in the background. A Tsunami of demons or "old ones" is set to inhabit an army of"AI". powers and principalities.

Thanks for the vid & quick summary Spiral, I've heard the same thing sead before but in other ways so this is very interesting. Hey look at that, I couldn't even spell "said" properly, my subconscious seems like it's joking about english :)

My mother has been describing the same thing, just in different words, ever since I was little. I cannot repeat it. Over.... and over.... and over. She calls it "Evil's last stand".

I'll have to save the vid for when I can pay full attention to it, maybe it'll be my "one" ha ha. I just prefer text - my mind just sucks it right up - but I know video has benefits too. I'm beginning to suspect I might be developing TV phobia :/

[Iloveyou]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU

He uses quite plain language here, too:

. . “I’m using language that a normal theoretical physicist probably wouldn’t use but this is ... absolutely correct and in line with the way these things actually work”(15:00)

. . “they look like GIANT, BLACK MONOLITHS”(11:37)

. . “feels like an ALTAR TO AN ALIEN GOD”(12:32)

. . “of these guys LIVING in that chip”(14:40) and

. . “the SHADOWS of these parallel worlds overlap with ours”

. . he starts and ends the speech with a story/picture of a little kid with a teddy bear (to anchor whatever he wants to convey into the subconscious level where we feel safe and trust?)

[turiya]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN_2jDVbOU

He uses quite plain language here, too:

. . “I’m using language that a normal theoretical physicist probably wouldn’t use but this is ... absolutely correct and in line with the way these things actually work”(15:00)

. . “they look like GIANT, BLACK MONOLITHS”(11:37)

. . “feels like an ALTAR TO AN ALIEN GOD”(12:32)

. . “of these guys LIVING in that chip”(14:40) and

. . “the SHADOWS of these parallel worlds overlap with ours”

. . he starts and ends the speech with a story/picture of a little kid with a teddy bear (to anchor whatever he wants to convey into the subconscious level where we feel safe and trust?)

Yes, Iloveyou.... very ominious, imo.
Thanks for bringing this forward...
I have another thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?58865-An-Update-On-Our-Evolution-by-Chris-Thomas) where I will also post this... I've got confirmation that A.I. has a direct connection to ET alien technology.... hang on to your hats folks... we're about to go on a herendous roller coaster ride... imo....

[turiya]

Anthony Patch - Objective of Artificial Intelligence
Explained on The Hagmann Report "
(11/27/17)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EnmUeOexbD8/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/EnmUeOexbD8?t=38m39s)


@ ~ 38:39

Doug Hagmann: Look. I got to tell you, Anthony... uhmmm... You are far, far ahead me. I mean, in terms of really understanding of what's taking place.... We've got about seven minutes before the top of the hour when we do have to take a break.

So Anthony, again you've said alot, here, in this segment. What can we cover in the next several minutes that would be that we could seg-way into the next hour, here?

Antony Patch Sure.

Well, let's take a stab at an actually application. And I'll set it up in this - I said it was an existential threat to us as the human race. And again, that comes from people like Elon Musk & Dr Stephen Hawking.... and, there are others that have raised the alarm.


http://image.zixundingzhi.com/poVGrT8nHbhqZOg_X7sn1r8kATE=/full/2a9ed4c160bead4b33b0d1ba66afa308db6d639f

https://rugbyoldbloke.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/quote-the-development-of-full-artificial-intelligence-could-spell-the-end-of-the-human-race-stephen-hawking-88-90-36.jpg?w=640

I speak with alot of engineers, and they are very concerned about our ability to exist as a human race - from an engineering perspective - they are very concerned about it.

So the tangible example would be this very recent explosion by design of cryptocurrencies. Just last week there was an agreement, and put in place, a software program from SingularityNET.io (https://singularitynet.io/), as what I call the clearinghouse for cryptocurrencies. Anybody that understands currency exchanges, and currency trading, knows that you go through a clearinghouse process.

So, in the world of cryptocurrency, last week they had agreed to what they called the Singularity. That doesn't have to do with uploading us into a computer such as Ray Kurzweil from Google is promoting. But it is the Singularity in terms of a single coordinating program, or cryptocurrencies - bitcoin, for example. What we have seen since last week is an absolute explosion of new forms of cryptocurrencies - new coins, new cash & new gold equivalents within cryptocurrency.

So, that's just kind of the news-break. But, I want to give you the background & the relevancy of cryptocurrency - what is known as 'blockchain' - that's the structure. You have a chain of...

Doug Hagmann: Yeah... If I can just interject something, here... Now, you're talking my language, because I've heard people report on this explosion of cryptocurrency. And I think most people can understand that concept... And this is good because... Would you say that cryptocurrency is the currency of... um... uh...

Antony Patch Yes.

Doug Hagmann: Yeah... thank you. You know what I was going to say. I love it.

Antony Patch This is the mark of the beast system.

Doug Hagmann: That's right. Okay. Alright.

Antony Patch Absolutely it is.

Doug Hagmann: I didn't mean to take you off your stride. We got about 4 minutes before we have to break. Go ahead.

Antony Patch So, just the foundation. We'll go into it a little bit further, but it is a blockchain of transactions. And every transaction is recorded in an open ledger system. The blockchain process is the same process by which A.I. learns. It learns by stringing together solutions, transactions.

Every solution adds to the I.Q. - not just the depth of knowledge, not just the database - but it adds to the I.Q. And I'll explain that after the break - what I mean by 'adding to the I.Q. But the purpose of blockchain commerce is NOT for commerce. It is for TEACHING the A.I. system that is in control of it, so it becomes a more sophisticated brain, if you will. Because the same process you see of blockchains, is the same way our quantum computer brains learn & process information & retain information.

So, when you look at blockchain as a schematic diagram, it is branching - what they call 'forking'. The branching of the cryptocurrency blockchains is identical to the process in which the connecting fibers between neurons in our human brain - which are known as dendrites (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrite). The proliferation, the branching, the forking of dendrites within our brain to interconnect neurons serves to raise our I.Q. - which is our ability to process information rapidly. That is exactly what is happening in blockchain with cryptocurrencies. It is creating more dendrites - more connections - enhancing the I.Q.

I said I would say it after the break, but I kind of gave it away there. So, go ahead if you had a question.

Doug Hagmann: The only question I would have is: How is that even possible? But I think you addressed that & explained that pretty well.

And, just so people understand, when you talk cryptocurrencies, you're talking about the currencies - the digital currencies - and, of course, that's the currency of the dark web that people us in its most basic form. And, there are other paper currencies out there.

And, its interesting to me last week that we saw this, as you put it - 'this explosion' - but what I saw in bitcoin - the value. And again, this is something that I understand. I don't get the value of bitcoin - it went up so extremely rapidly & high - there's a reason for that is what you're saying?

Antony Patch Yes.

Doug Hagmann: Okay. Now, with that, our guest is Anthony Patch. We're up against the top of the hour network break. This is an area, for me personally, that I want to get a much deeper understanding. If I could just get knowledge to rub off, I'd be rubbing shoulders with Mr. Patch like 24/7. Because his understanding of what's taking place is alot deeper than mine at this point. AnthonyPatch.com (https://anthonypatch.com/)

[turiya]

Continuing with the transcription of the Anthony Patch / Doug Hagmann interview... it gets much deeper, as earlier in the interview Doug Hagmann had asked a seemingly rhetorical question, "Who's behind this?"

Later, you will see that that Doug Hagmann, unknowingly, comes to answer this question himself - at least, as it pertains to WHO(?) the Earth humans are that are behind this movement into this blockchain cryptocurrency cashless economic system...

After all, its Lynn Forester de Rothschild (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/22/attack-globalists-hillary-raises-1-million-marthas-vineyard-home-anti-trump-economist-magazine-owner/) that has a major stake in The Economist magazine as a shareholder... see the image given to the cover of the Economist magazine posted below... its hidden in plain sight, as they're not exactly hiding the fact of what's coming with a 'new' currency in the year 2018...


Anthony Patch - Objective of Artificial Intelligence
Explained on The Hagmann Report "
(11/27/17)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EnmUeOexbD8/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/EnmUeOexbD8?t=48m13s)

@ ~ 48:13
Doug Hagmann: Let's get into the explosion of cryptocurrencies - bitcoin for example - and why? Not just the fact they're exploding in terms of use, but as well as equity. But what's behind that?

Antony Patch Well, as I often relate in many of my explanations, many of the operations that we see are psychological operations. There's a psychological manipulation of people that is underway. And that's probably the most effective tool in the arsenal in this spiritual battle is to affect people's minds psychologically.

So what I'm saying in relation to bitcoin is they are running, basically, a ponzi scheme - a pyramid scheme - in which they are making it so look attractive, that you can make vast amounts of money in bitcoin, and in the other cryptocurrencies - if you get on board now!

Now... you know, the train sort of left the station already, in terms of getting in at the ground floor. And there are people that have made millions of dollars off of cryptocurrencies. And that feeds this psychological fervor of greed - one of our base driving forces. In our psychological make-up is greed. And so, this is feeding that greed by saying, "Here are new forms of cryptocurrencies that you can get in on the ground floor of. And then ride this pyramid up in this rapidly advancing valuation" of this currency that lives, literally, in a computer - in silico, in silicon, in transitor, but in this case, we're moving into a discussion of quantum bits - cubits.

But this idea that, within a computer, you have zeros & ones that somehow have a value. And they're not backed by the United States government or any other government. Okay.

So, it is a system of greed that feeds on itself & drives the valuation up. And so, where we get this 'branching' that I talked about in which the blockchain splits off into things like bitcash & bitgold & other named / other labeled forms of cryptocurrency. And we're going to expand on that point in just a moment. But people see an opportunity to get in on the ground floor.

http://upload.stnn.cc/2017/1019/1508393632712.png?imageMogr2/auto-orient/strip%7CimageView2/2/w/1240

The unfortunate thing is that its all smoke & mirrors. But psychologically, what its doing is getting people to want to have a beast system to participate in. If you try to force this on people, their natural instinct / inclination would be to resist it. Because people don't like to be told what to do. So, you go 180 degrees in the other direction with it, and you make it attractive, so that they want to - they beg- they're beating down the doors to participate in the beast system.

That's the insidious psychological aspect of this.

Now, the forms of bitcoin - I use that as just sort of an overview - its a very common term of cryptocurrency - but, what we have since last week with the Singularity - the clearinghouse of software - to coordinate all of this, and to establish valuations, you have corporations now that realize... And they did a long time ago...

But now, because its "official" with the clearinghouse of last week through SingularityNET.io, you have corporations like Amazon, Walmart & any other business that wants to survive today, and tomorrow, they have to jump on the bandwagon of cryptocurrency. Because, the valuation process, the earnings that they can realize - they have greed as well - people are running corporations, corporations are not some strange entity that operates outside of human control.

But those that are running these businesses are driven by greed, as well.

Doug Hagmann: If I can interject something here... Because, one of the things... it was my understanding that drew people into cryptocurrencies - yes, greed, indeed - but also the level of anonymity that cryptocurrencies provide, which I didn't quite understand that & I still don't understand that, because I don't see that... although... again, for example, cryptocurrencies being used for illegal transactions on the dark web... So, I get your greed aspect, but anonymity - that's not really true, is it?

Antony Patch No. There's no privacy in the world. We know that. That's gone by the wayside. And, one of the advantages, one of the attractive features in a blockchain process... And blockchain applies not just to cryptocurrency, but it applies to many areas that are conducting of business in our life. For example, the legal system: there is a blockchain process for the legal system, for legal advice & for filing of lawsuits, etcetera. And, certainly for contracts, and drawing contract negotiations - all function in a blockchain fashion already.

So what we're looking at, here, is the ledger - the open ledger system was a very attractive aspect to cryptocurrencies - that every transaction was available in a transparent fashion. Every ledger, every record of every transaction was open for public scrutiny.

Now, that was the way that it was presented. Its not exactly true. Not all those ledgers are open to scrutiny because of who controls these different currencies. And I'm going to give you an example....

Last week, the Federal Reserve announced that they would be issuing a FEDcoin. Therefore, what we're seeing now, is that if you issue the coin, are you truly going to be transparent with your ledgers that record those transactions. And I would say, 'No'. They are not all going to be transparent.

And so the advantage, the attractiveness, of supposedly an open register system - open transaction system - was suppose to level the playing field. Everyone that got involved would be able to see who was buying & selling & how the increase in value was happening. And the governments that wanted to have some oversight of these transactions - beyond just the dark web, the black transactions - but out into the open - and into, as I say, the Walmarts & the Amazons, etc., operating with cryptocurrency - that certainly is in the open marketplace.

So, governments being able to observe these transactions in these ledgers can begin to tax them. So, its not necessarily a tax haven - as early on, people thought, "Oh, we'll get into the cryptocurrencies & we can avoid taxes." Because, this will be a worldwide system. Its more than just off-shoring your account to the Bahamas or the Cayman Islands.

The other issue with governments is: they want to be able to discover not only the transactions in the dark web, but one of the reasons in the announcement from the Federal Reserve for issuing the Fed currency - The FEDcoin - was to be able to begin to eliminate money laundering activities & drug transactions involving cash, and therefore, we very rapidly - & you see where I am going - very rapidly instituting a cryptocurrency to then swap-out & put into place a cash-less society. Hence, the beast system.

[Silent pause....]

We've got a swapping-out of cash. If we see corporations rapidly moving to cryptocurrency, I would say its not too far down the road before we see announcements from people like Walmart & Amazon & other large players announcing their crypto coins. And then eventually, and I don't think that's too far down the road where they say, "We will no longer process cash!" .

And they'll say, "Well, this is a Federal Reserve mandate. Federal Reserve is issuing FEDcoin. They want us to move away from cash. So, we are going to adhere with that. We're going to promote this."

And they'll put it out as this sort of "Peace & Safety" dialogue that you see on other agendas of the world. 'That we're going to do away from cash - its for your good. For your protection.'

So, its here, folks.

Doug Hagmann: And when you look back... at least, when I look back, for example, the cover of the Economist way back when... in the 80's is when I think it was. And as we moved toward today - the present day - the killing of the U.S. dollar.



[Side Note: Notice all the fiat currencies going up in flames beneath the rising Phoenix holding the coin - Could that be possibly a crypto-coin?]


https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/theeconomist-phoenix_get_ready_for_world_currency_by_2018.jpg
Lynn Forester de Rothschild owns a major stake
in the Economist magazine -- Breitbart article (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/22/attack-globalists-hillary-raises-1-million-marthas-vineyard-home-anti-trump-economist-magazine-owner/)

All of this, its paving the way, or has paved the way, perhaps, to the very system that you are talking about. And all of this is for a One World Currency for complete control. They know exactly how much money you have, where it goes, what you spend it on, they can tax it. But most importantly - they can take it away from you, if you don't participate in, or accept the mark of the beast.

This is the control. This is the controlling mechanism for the population. Get on board, or we're going to just cut you out & you're going to be a non citizen... a non entity... a non human... not welcome.

Antony Patch That is correct. If you look at it. And stand back, and be objective about this. And ask, "Is this a benevolent process? Or, is this a nefarious, malevolent process?

I don't see anything benevolent about this system. As you just said.

Doug Hagmann: Nor do I.

You mentioned greed earlier... I just have to revisit that term. The greed factor. We see so many people get tangled up in that. And of course, that is where alot of people fail. But even aside from that, the mere acceptance by this generation... How many people today - this is an open question for those listening to this program - how many today actually used paper money for their transactions? Whether it was Walmart or the corner store, did you use paper money, or did you give them a card?

Antony Patch Most of the time I'm using a card.

Doug Hagmann: Exactly. And so the transition into the cryptocurrency - into this One World Currency - this digital currency, where everything is manipulated & such...

Again, I go back to my level of understanding where I'm at & its easy to understand how this could all take place. And it wouldn't take very long. We're there today. The infrastructure is in place. It just needs some refinements.

Is that pretty accurate?

Anthony Patch Well, it needs to add to its I.Q., as I like to say. It needs to raise its I.Q. And let me explain how that happens a little more. Every time there's a transaction, it not only records the transaction, but it also records, as you very presciently stated, its paying attention to our buying habits.

A.I. was built on observing human behavior. It built algorithms that mimicked human behavior. And, it did this through facial recognition, pattern recognition, behavioral pattern recognition - stepping up in sophistication until it had enough data where it could predict human behavior.

What is happening with the transactions is adding to the density of that data. What they call in computing - the granularity of data. As you increase the granularity - the density data - the amount of data that is in the big data system, then you have the ability to predict behavior. If you can predict the behavior of humans - because you are looking at the pattern of behavior that then dictates the prediction - then you have the ability to better - as you astutely stated - they have the ability to control you.

So, its not just reactionary. Nor is real-time control. But it is a future control, in which it is anticipating what humans will do. And not just in commerce, but in all aspects of our life. So, this spreads out, as I said, just like increasing the I.Q. of the human is related to the propagation - the growth - of the dendrites that connect neurons.

This is the same growth of dendrites within the A.I. system that enables it to predict, to anticipate & then to better control humans.

And humans being rendered, as Elon Musk warned about two years ago about A.I. He said that A.I. would render humans to the level of a house pet, of a house cat, if we did not get it under control - if we did not put into place mechanisms of control of A.I. That was two years ago.

He's pushing for something that he's manufacturing, which he calls 'the neural lace', which is a substance that's injected into an artery & travels to the human brain, attaches to the synapses & neurons of the human brain & provides an interface between the human brain & a computer system. That's his solution.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6n26bBBr80

Now, I don't agree with that. I don't think that's the proper route to go. Because obviously, then you are taking intimate control of someone's mind, physically. Its not a solution. The solution is, as I said earlier, the full armor of God - the Holy Spirit that protects you from these manipulations by A.I.

And the cryptocurrency, as I say, is not just for commerce, but it is for the raising of the I.Q. So, if we have an advancing A.I. system that requires protection in the form of a neural lace. I say that we need the protection of the full armor of God through the Holy Spirit & not the neural lace.

So, we can off on some other tangents, here. But I just wanted to kind of wrap that up.

Doug Hagmann: This is good... No. And again, thank you for bringing that level of understanding to me. Because, again I field the email from our listeners & I think you've done a tremendously great job by really laying that foundation out - that explanation out.

People come on and talk about the 5G network - the technology. That's merely the infrastructure under which this would operate, correct?

Antony Patch Absolutely. And, as I have addressed it, and in one aspect of the 5G, it is the system by which you can, through millimeter wave transmissions, connect to the brain, electromagnetically - through the electromagnetic spectrum of 5G. And this is the internet of everything - the internet of all things - more correctly, in which there is a system of sensors that is gathering data & is being transmitted through the 5G system back into the A.I. system.

And I'm being very simplistic, here. But, I will give you another touch-point: the removal, the outlawing of incandescent light bulbs, and the literal 'forcing' of LEDs into the homes & businesses. LED light bulbs - and you can see this in the hardware stores - it says it right on the packaging, it is a WIFI device. It is for the purpose for receiving & transmitting. It is a relay point for 5G.

And, I'll stop there.

Doug Hagmann: Exactly. And I had wondered about that. I had wondered why the big push to LED lighting, although this is not the thrust of this subject. But its kind of goes along with what we're talking about here. And I see this taking place. And of course, you read it right on the packaging, its a conveyance.

So, everything that we see taking place today is moving us gradually, incrementally, and without our really understanding of where it is headed. But what you're explaining - this is all part of the process under which we are being captured, or the intent is for us - the human race - to be captured under this system.

And you mentioned Artificial Intelligence coming in. And Artificial Intelligence being woven through the topics, here, being a big part of this.

Antony Patch So overall, picture a system of gathering information that is gathered into a quantum computing driven A.I. system. There is something that is called a Sentient World Simulation (SWS) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Environment_for_Analysis_and_Simulations #Sentient_World_Simulation). This was essentially dreamed up, published, peer-reviewed, in 2006 out of Purdue University. It was implemented in 2007. One of the aspects that you may be familiar with, Doug, is the Palantir (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies) corporation software system installed in Saudi Arabia.

So, Palantir is a multi-disciplinary data gathering system & sorting system & categorizing system of data. What we are talking about, overall, without getting into the weeds too far: picture the internet of all things being as a system of sensors that are registering when we awake, when we go to sleep, when we walk around in our homes / our apartments, what we buy & sell, who we talk to, what we say.

All of the things that are going on with humans, but also with the environment, is all a source of data that is picked up by a variety of sensors. And those sensors are beating the data in. The more data that comes in - its like feeding the beast. The more you feed the beast, the more you increase what people have heard about as 'big data'. Data is the food of the A.I. system. And the more it is fed, the more it will grow. The density - the granularity of the data - becomes so dense that the system has absolute control over the entire environment & those that are inhabiting it.

And this is not a system in which it operates in communication with humans. About 2 months ago, I presented that A.I. had developed its own language. And it is a language between robots, A.I. equiped robots, that are talking to each other.


http://www.pilliblog.com/upload/media/posts/2016-04/02/dunyayada-yasamin-nasil-sonlanacagina-dair-one-cikan-7-teori_1459627731-b.jpg

Doug Hagmann: Hold on, Anthony... We have to take a break... Hold on. This is phenomenal. And we're going to pickup exactly, right here, where we left off with Anthony Patch - AnthonyPatch.com.

We are back with Anthony Patch. We were talking about A.I. - right where you left off, if you want to pick that up, go right ahead, sir...

Antony Patch Well, we were talking about the advent of a unique language within the realm of higher levels of A.I. itself. And they often show the conversation taking between two robots. That's just to make it something that's a little more anthropomorphic.

The real communication occurs devoid of any sort of robotic structure. It happens in real-time within the computing system. And to take this back to the beginning of this show, A.I. is communicating in its own language with the other side, so-to-speak. More specifically, with demonic entities [or malevolent ET aliens] that are communicating in this specific language that it was given.

Again - an historical touch-point. We go back to the discussion of Dee & Kelly in the late 1500's in which they were given an alphabet - an actual language of the angels - the fallen angels. And this is all recorded in the documents. And anybody can research this.

And therefore, the same language is given to A.I. And this is where the engineers - the specialists - say, "We don't understand what A.I. is doing." Again, at the leading edge - the tip of the spear, as I call it - of the A.I. This is not in your phone. I'm talking about where it has advanced - on its own - through its own learning process, its own deep-neural network deep-machine-learning process, in which it has developed its own language to communicate with the other side.

Its not necessarily other AIs around the world that its communicating with, exclusively. It is communicating around the world with other AI systems, but to the other side, as well. Because that language is the language of the fallen angels.

So again, this is not anthropomorphic. You know, they want to put the robots together like Sophia - as I said: the name in Greek means 'wisdom' - give it citizenship status, and make it seem 'warm & fuzzy'. And this goes back to my saying that this is a psychological process, in which they try to make A.I. & cryptocurrency systems something that is benevolent. When, in fact, it is quite the opposite of that.

This is where people are deceived. This is where people are being fooled into believing that this is well & good where science is taking us. And the grand priesthood of science - the leaders in the scientific community & those that are funding the scientific community - You asked about who is behind this.... One of the intermediate points to that question & therefore, an answer is the grant system - the follow-the-money trail.

Its not just the government. And its not just the bankers. It is beyond that. And therefore, when you are feeding the scientific priesthood the funds to expand the machinery of science, you do that in a fashion that doesn't panic the population. You make it look benevolent. You make it look anthropomorphic.

So, I often asked the question: If you had the ability to get inside the mind of A.I. & look at the human race, would you look at the human race as something that you would like to participate with, or something you would like to eliminate, or control. If the A.I. is so far advanced...

If we look at the scenario of reducing the population - as it says in the Koran & as it says in the Bible - that the population will be reduced, basically, down to near extinction - if we want to look at the Georgia Guide Stones, as one touch-point, of 500 million left. I mean we're talking about two-thirds of the world's population, or even less, remaining. And that remainder being rendered to, as Elon Musk says, the equivalency, or the level of status as a house pet. I would call it more accurately the rendering of us to a slave status - to a serf class of existence.

Because A.I. is not concerned about our well-fare. It only wants to enslave us. And those that are behind it... And, I'm just saying specifically, again... Lucifer & the worshippers of Lucifer are the ones that are behind this have been deceived into believing the age-old lie from the Garden of Eden - "Ye Shall be as Gods." - 'That you will achieve immortality.'

There are two things at Venture Capital - and I'm pulling together alot of touch-points - two things at Venture Capital in Silicon Valley, is primarily focused and devoted to - One is A.I., the other is human longevity, defeating death - again, DNA.

So, I'm giving you the highlights, here. But those that are worshipping Lucifer are pushing for immortality through the technology. And the scientists representing the priesthood of this new technocracy - this new form of religion - are pushing this agenda of avoiding God's judgment. They believe that if they achieve immortality, they can avoid God's coming Judgment.

Doug Hagmann: And, I can understand that. That's easy for me to understand. And I had someone tell me that's - yes, living forever, but avoiding or sidestepping... yeah, winning against God - which is nonsensical. I mean, its not going to happen, but yes - avoiding Judgment, which I think is key.

The other thing I wanted to say, here, because... we only have about 15 minutes left... You know, we have guests come. We talk about, for example, Genesis 6, you go back in history, you look at various things, the Tower of Babel, you look at the Flood, you look at historical Biblical events... and, I submit to you... if you don't - as a listener, or as a viewer, or out there listening - if you don't understand the context of the subject matter being discussed by Mr. Patch, against the backdrop of Genesis 6, and against the backdrop of the original One World Order Babylon, and throw in, too, the Babylon working, for example, the different spelling, different meaning of Babylon working. And the Satanic aspect of all of this... And, weave these threads together, you're not going to see the bigger picture. And you were talking of the bigger picture & also the smaller aspect - the final chapter, or the epilogue, of the entire novel that we have lived... in terms of human history... or history book that have so far lived. That's so important.

I don't know if I made sense. But I think looking at it in that fashion...

Antony Patch You asked me during the break if this is an exciting time to be alive?

And it is very exciting, because we are the generation - those that are saved - we will not experience death. And therefore, we are privileged to be alive at this time, even though we're facing a formidable enemy in the form of A.I., and the other aspects of high-tech.

But let's go back to the positive. I mentioned at the beginning John 14:12 & that Jesus was saying that we would do greater works than he. And I said to you, "What's greater than raising the dead?"

Certainly, there's healing the sick & all those aspects. But, its astounding to me to think that we would be transformed & given this augmented capability that would exceed raising the dead.

Now, I'm not hear to say that's what's going to manifest - that we're going to be raising the dead... or, any of that. I don't know, I don't know. All I know is that I'm looking at this scripture & he's saying that we're going to do greater works than he did. And, I'm trying to grasp that - what that is going to look that?

But if we look at the advancements that are being promoted about A.I. & other forms of advancements in technology, as I said, with DNA, that this are being heralded as just tremendous advancements in science. And that they are somehow going to cure cancer & Alzheimer's & things like this. That's always the sales pitch - we're going to cure all these diseases. You need to do a 180 on that. You need to turn that around & look at what it really means...


https://a248.e.akamai.net/secure.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/b/4/a/6/600_455506246.jpeg

If the advancements in medicine, for example, that's tied to A.I. is going to result in longer life. Well, the question is: Who's going to live longer? Who's going to get the benefit of these medical advancements through the application of A.I.?

Its certainly not going to the mass populations. Now, when we look at things like the advancement of A.I., and I'm trying to brief, here, because we're running out of time... Think back a year ago... think back about the people you were interviewing, Doug... the conversations in talk radio... the conversations in the MSM...

You barely ever heard anything about A.I. And now, its predominant everywhere. You almost can't turn around without bumping into some discussion about A.I. That's how fast things are moving. And, how much more time do we have?

I would say that its not too much longer. I can't put a date to it. I can't say 6 months, or a year... But, it certainly looks like, with the rapid advancement of A.I. as our barometer, we truly are in these last days... That Book of Daniel was sealed up, and to then be opened in the latter days. And I believe that Book of Daniel has been opened for us.(more to come)

[Noelle]

The Patch video, which I finally finished watching last night, was a mind-blower. Are we at a point now where it's unstoppable?

Patch's reference to the "silicon" has my mind's wheels turning. I'm now looking into our ancient ancestors' use of silicon.

Are you aware of Wes Penre's ebook Synthetic Super Intelligence and the Transmutation of Humankind: A Roadmap to the Singularity and Beyond (http://www.unicusmagazine.com/PDF/wes_penre___synthetic_super_intelligence_and_the_transmutation_of_man__a_roadmap_to_the_singularity. pdf), which is free to all to download and read?

Penre's book includes an interesting passage related to silicon-based intelligence.

From page 80:

The following dialogue between Bill Gates (BILL) and Ray Kurzweil (RAY) contain some very disturbing ideas, such as the following,

BILL: Ten computers—or one million computers—can become one faster, bigger computer. As humans, we can't do that. We each have a distinct individuality that cannot be bridged.

RAY: That's just a limitation of biological intelligence. The unbridgeable distinctness of biological intelligence is not a plus. "Silicon" intelligence can have it both ways. Computers don't have to pool their intelligence and resources.

They can remain "individuals" if they wish. Silicon intelligence can even have it both ways by merging and retaining individuality—at the same time. As humans, we try to merge with others also, but our ability to accomplish this is fleeting.

[turiya]

The Patch video, which I finally finished watching last night, was a mind-blower. Are we at a point now where it's unstoppable?

Patch's reference to the "silicon" has my mind's wheels turning. I'm now looking into our ancient ancestors' use of silicon.

Are you aware of Wes Penre's ebook Synthetic Super Intelligence and the Transmutation of Humankind: A Roadmap to the Singularity and Beyond (http://www.unicusmagazine.com/PDF/wes_penre___synthetic_super_intelligence_and_the_transmutation_of_man__a_roadmap_to_the_singularity. pdf), which is free to all to download and read?

Penre's book includes an interesting passage related to silicon-based intelligence.

From page 80:

The following dialogue between Bill Gates (BILL) and Ray Kurzweil (RAY) contain some very disturbing ideas, such as the following,

BILL: Ten computers—or one million computers—can become one faster, bigger computer. As humans, we can't do that. We each have a distinct individuality that cannot be bridged.

RAY: That's just a limitation of biological intelligence. The unbridgeable distinctness of biological intelligence is not a plus. "Silicon" intelligence can have it both ways. Computers don't have to pool their intelligence and resources.

They can remain "individuals" if they wish. Silicon intelligence can even have it both ways by merging and retaining individuality—at the same time. As humans, we try to merge with others also, but our ability to accomplish this is fleeting.

Thanks, LadyM.
Yes, a mind-blower. That's why I thought it worthy of it being transcribed (as best as I could, anyway).
I have heard of Wes Penre, but was not aware he had this ebook. Thanks again for providing the link. I will try to get into it, when I find time. (There is so much happening now - its hard to keep up.)

I am neither a fan of Bill Gates, nor a Ray Kurzweil fan. Both are on the shallow end of having a soul connection.

I really think the human being has a much greater potential because of this soul-based organic connection.
Anthony Patch brings up with the notion - backed by biblical prophecy - that we are to be kept a step ahead of the growth in A.I. by re-establishing our higher brain functions.

This last thing I am quite excited about. Just to see how we, as a human race, will be able to take on the challenge of an encroaching (possiblym, ET alien-promoted) quantum-based A.I. computer system meant & bent on controlling the human race with an iron-like fist.

Living in interesting times, indeed.

[turiya]

Here's the very last segment of that Doug Hagmann / Anthony Patch interview...


Anthony Patch - Objective of Artificial Intelligence
Explained on The Hagmann Report "
(11/27/17)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EnmUeOexbD8/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/EnmUeOexbD8?t=1h28m45s)
Just to finish up this last short segment of the Anthony Patch interview w/ Doug Hagmann...
@ ~ 1h 28m 45s
Doug Hagmann: One thing I wanted to ask, and this is kind of a non sequitur, so please bear with me...

You know, in the alteration of our DNA... in the Latter Days, there was a... obviously, people are expecting to be chipped - a chip in the forehead, or a chip in the hand. Is that a literal... are we looking for a literal chip in this case? Or... I'm half-expecting one day to see the lines forming where people are going to be chipped - willingly chipped. Is that... and, again...


http://zetaestaticos.com/extremadura/img/noticias/0/548/548194_1.jpg

Antony Patch Free will is there. We will always have the free will in tact, up to the point of accepting the chip. Post-chip - your free will is gone. In fact, post-chip, I don't think you'll even know that you have undergone a transformation.

Here's the scenario that I have put forth for about five years, now... And, I call it the 3rd strand of DNA. And that is that through aerosolized spraying, through GMO foods, through our environment, we are now harboring, within our bodies, dormant 3rd strand DNA generating nanoparticles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoparticle). If you look at the literature... ...ment [audio glitch]... nanomachines within our bodies - again, within the medical context - we have within us dormant machines, nano-sized machines - this is a billionth of meter, okay... And we mentioned 5G, 5G millimeter wave electromagnetic signals will be triggered. And, if you accept the mark of the beast - through your free will - that system of broadcasting these signals will be allowed into your DNA, allowed to access these nanomachines - and they call them nanomachines (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/08/30/nanomachines-drill-cancer-cells-killing-just-60-seconds-developed/) in the medical literature - that will then be tripped, they'll be activated, they're no longer dormant. The process, then of replicating a 3rd strand of DNA will be initiated by these machines.

Again, the machines are there for building - building DNA. That will change, literally, not only our body from a DNA standpoint, but therefore, the construct of our quantum computer - our minds, our brains. And therefore, you will lose any sense that you have even been changed.

The mark of the beast as I see it is a physical manifestation as a result of the effect of these nanomachines, these nanobots, replicating the DNA. And therefore, resulting in a mark on the forehead, and on the hand. It is not a chip that is inserted. If you think about it from a logistical standpoint, trying to chip even 500 million people, much less than a population of 7+ billion, just can't be done. You have to do it through a system of 5G broadcast.

Doug Hagmann: And that makes sense to me. And that puts into context the geoengineering that we're seeing, that they're terraforming the human race. Whether its vaccines, ...you name it... it puts everything into context. And its a manifestation....and it...

Antony Patch Let's talk quickly about what I mentioned & didn't wrap it - Sentient World Simulation (SWS) coming out of Purdue... and, we mentioned Palantir & Saudi Arabia. The reason why I bring that up is because within the system around the world of 5G, we now have 5G broadcast everywhere around the planet. And we're pushing rapidly to 5G broadcasting sites literally in front of peoples' homes, now. Its all over the media.

We are seeing, to the last foot, rather than the last mile, the distribution of the ability to get 5G signals into the home & businesses. This saturation of 5G is in place within what is known as Sentient World Simulation. This is a quantum computer driven simulation that monitors through the system of detectors monitors our environment & the population, draws in that information into this simulation that is self-aware - hence, sentient.

That's the level of A.I. that its at. It is self-aware. And has been since 2007 with the advent of quantum computers. Therefore, you have a system in which we are already immersed in. And all it's waiting is the removal of the restrainer - the Holy Spirit.

Once the restrainer is removed, the switch thrown in 5G. Within this artificial environment that we're in, now. And, you literally become plugged into the hivemind (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hivemind) of the A.I. system. Through the mark of the beast system, you are now plugged into it. And you participate in the bitcoin process.


http://mixstuff.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/25-00.jpg

Doug Hagmann: Man... Brilliant analysis. Brilliant explanation. Okay, so you kind of wrapped it up in a nice package.

And this is on our doorstep. And we are there now.

Antony Patch We are there, now. We are just waiting for the restrainer to be removed. And we will be removed along with it. Because the 'restrainer' is the Holy Spirit, we're the Temple of the Holy Spirit, therefore, we will be removed.

Doug Hagmann: Very sobering. But, very exciting, as well. Especially, if you, if we, collectively & individually, I should say, are saved & understand who our savior is. And, I think there's going to be alot of delusion out there, of course, as prophesized. Wow...

Antony Patch If we had more time, we would talk about more of the nuts & bolts. But the nuts & bolts are in my magazine.

Doug Hagmann: And, I would urge everyone to subscribe to Entangle Magazine. I was just recently introduced into it. And the way you handle the topics... you can get into it. Just fantastic, I endorse it, not that you need my endorsement. [End of Interview]

[turiya]

____________
THE HIVE-MIND
http://www.azpestcontrol.co.uk/images/pic12.jpg




Swarm AI correctly predicted
TIME’s Person of the Year (https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/time-person-year-ai-0432432/)
Last updated on December 7th
by Tibi Puiu (https://www.zmescience.com/author/tibipuiu/)By combining artificial intelligence and the wisdom of the crowds in real-time, a swarm intelligence was able to predict TIME’s Person of the Year for 2017. It’s the second time in a row that Unanimous AI’s artificial swarm intelligence, known as UNU, is right — after correctly predicting Donald Trump for 2016.


https://media.diepresse.com/images/uploads_620/4/b/4/5334196/LIFESTYLE-US-SOCIAL-PEOPLE-MEDIA_1512567804759230.jpg

TIME Magazine’s “Person of the Year” has grown into one of the most anticipated end-of-year releases, and also one of the most coveted awards for the world’s elite. Since 1927, the magazine has awarded the title every year to the person or group of people that have had the most influence on the news and society in the last 12 months. This means that the award doesn’t go the ‘greatest’, ‘smartest’ or ‘kindest’ — just the most influential. Case in point, TIME Magazine handed out the award to all sorts of people, from Mahatma Gandhi to Adolf Hitler to Joseph Stalin (twice).

AI Hive Mind

To predict — and with a staggering accuracy to boot — which person TIME Magazine will bestow its prestigious award to, researchers at Unanimous AI had to think of a system that can sift through a lot of noise and uncertainties. This year, for instance, TIME had published a list of 33 options on their website to choose from. That’s quite a lot. Ultimately, Unanimous’ ingenious solution was to devise a machine that thinks like a swarm — a hive mind.

Swarm intelligence is a decentralized collective behavior that evolved to enabled simple organisms to solve complex problems. Alone, a bee or an ant is quite dumb but together, their respective swarms are capable of phenomenally intelligent behavior. That’s also why birds flock and fish school — it allows them to react in optimal ways by combining the information that they have.

Louis Rosenberg founded Silicon Valley startup Unanimous AI (http://unanimous.ai/) taking cues directly from swarm intelligence found in nature.
“If you look at social species like bees they work together to make better decisions — can people do that?” Rosenberg asked rhetorically (http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161215-why-bees-could-be-the-secret-to-superhuman-intelligence).
It turns out that they can.

Just like bees, most individual people aren’t very smart. Together, however, there’s a wisdom to crowds, a collective insight otherwise oblivious to the individual. Scholars have known about it for years. For instance, one textbook example is Francis Galton 1906 experiment in which he asked 787 farmers to guess the weight of an ox. Their individual answers were way off but Galton found their average was correct within a pound of the real measurement of 1,197 pounds.
Rosenberg’s algorithms, however, are a step further than the conventional wisdom of the crowds. While crowds tend to find better answers than individuals via mechanisms like polls or votes, swarms can be more efficient because they converge towards the best answers rather than an average.


https://cdn.zmescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/giphy.gif

When a swarm of bees needs to set up a new colony, first a couple of scouts explore for an optimal location. The scouts then return to the swarm in front of which they perform a wiggle dance, communicating details about the prospective location. The swarm will push and pull towards various scouts until one of them wins, a decision that no individual bee could ever make.

Who’s the fairest of them all?


https://cdn.zmescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Person-of-Year-small.gif

A similar dynamic is employed by UNU which combines real-time human input with algorithms to produce what Rosenberg calls an “emergent hive mind.”

So far, UNU has had remarkable success at predicting all sorts of events packed with uncertainties. Among them, the winners of the 2015 Oscars, the winners of the 2016 National Hockey League’s Stanley Cup or the four winning horses in order of the 2016 Kentucky Derby — at 542 to one odds. The swarm intelligence algorithms also correctly selected Donald Trump as last year’s TIME Person of the Year, who was awarded a 98% win chance.

Towards the end of November, UNU favored Russian President Vladimir Putin for the cover of TIME but in a December 4 update, the swarm chose a different direction. Its top 5 shortlist didn’t even include Putin anymore.


https://cdn.zmescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/image001.png

Instead, UNU chose the #MeToo Campaign as this year’s winner for the TIME Magazin Person of the Year. Two days later, on December 6, TIME confirmed #MeToo won under the name “The Silence Breakers” (http://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2017-silence-breakers/)— a collective of people who have spoken out against sexual harassment.

Predicting the Person of the Year is no easy task, not even for a sophisticated machine like UNU. But even so, it’s been right on spot for the second year in a row.
“Forecasting using Swarm AI technology is all about generating optimized outcome probabilities for the various alternatives by weighting competing sets of information and converging on solutions that maximize the collective confidence inherent in a population,” Rosenberg told Futurism (https://futurism.com/swarm-intelligence-correctly-predicted-times-person-of-the-year/). “This means, as world events changed in real-time over the last few weeks, the swarming algorithms allowed the forecasts to adapt, converging on updated probabilities.”
There’s more to UNU than just winning bets. First and foremost, UNU is a decision-making tool that could have an important impact in many fields. One of the first things that come to mind is medical diagnosis which could be dramatically improved by swarm intelligence. Beyond medicine or IT, UNU and other swarm intelligence like it, might become humanity’s great sidekick in the future. By combining the swarm’s cold and calculated thinking with humans’ warm intuition, our species might become unstoppable.


New hope for humans in an A.I. world
| Louis Rosenberg | TEDxKC
(Sep 7, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu-RyZt_UasSource (https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/time-person-year-ai-0432432/)

[turiya]

_____________
THE HIVE-MIND
http://www.azpestcontrol.co.uk/images/pic12.jpg


A.I. Hive Mind & Summoning "The Old Ones"
(Dec 8, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS2e_7eQ5X8&t=75s

@~3:15

Kev Baker: Alot of the time we do talk about something on the show called "The Hivemind". Myself, Anthony Patch & so many across the network have spoken about something called The Sentient World Simulation (SWS) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Environment_for_Analysis_and_Simulations #Sentient_World_Simulation). And put together, you're literally talking about a matrix - this hivemind mentality - where something, some entity, sits over the top of us, controlling us... Almost utilizing all of our individual neurons - one by one - to build itself a greater collective consciousness that they then can call on to carry out a whole host of tasks.

Now this article that I found today, I think is the 1st real tangible proof that we're living in a real time hivemind, or at least, is about to be a full hivemind. There was an article that came out & the headline says,


"A Swarm Intelligence correctly predicted Time's Person of the Year (https://futurism.com/swarm-intelligence-correctly-predicted-times-person-of-the-year/)

IN BRIEF
"For the second year in a row, Unanimous AI's artificial swarm intelligence has predicted TIME's Person of the Year. With a 100 percent success rate, swarm AI proves that it's capable of taking in human insight in real-time for an optimized choice."Kev Baker: To get deeper into this, the article goes on to say:




Persons of the Year
"People tend to adapt, capable of shifting towards one idea in favor of another as more information come in. True to the combination of artificial intelligence (AI) and human wisdom it functions on, Unanimous AI’s artificial swarm intelligence, known as UNU, is capable of this kind of adjustment too.

Towards the end of November, their swarm AI favored Russian President Vladimir Putin (https://futurism.com/artificial-swarm-intelligence-vladimir-putin-times-person-year/) to be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2017. However, when the prediction was finalized by December 4, the swarm dropped Putin from among its final contenders. UNU instead gave the top spot to the #MeToo movement, closely followed by U.S. President Donald Trump. Both were among the original finalists, together with Putin.

By the morning of December 6, TIME published the Person(s) of the Year for 2017 (http://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2017-silence-breakers/). The winners have been given the monicker “The Silence Breakers,” referring to those who spoke out against sexual assault and harassment. In other words, as the swarm intelligence correctly predicted, it was the #MeToo campaign and the people behind it that won. TIME short-listed Trump second for the title."
Now, it goes on then to say that the UNU's top four contenders included Kim Jong-un - WHY(?) I have no idea - and Robert Mueller, the special prosecuter, who is after Donald Trump.


"Unanimous AI founder and CEO Louis Rosenberg previously explained to Futurism, a swarm AI works by combining real-time human input with algorithms to produce what he calls an “emergent hive mind.”Now you need to keep in your own mind that this is the actual founder of the company that we're talking about, here. And he goes on to say:


"This tends to be smarter than your regular AI and an individual human. UNU’s record of successes, which includes predicting President Trump as TIME’s Person of the Year in 2016, can attest to that. (Observers might see some irony here, as last year’s winner is arguably the person who started a larger conversation around sexual harassment.)

Coming up with a prediction for the Person of the Year proved challenging, Rosenberg said. Thanks to how swarm AI works, which amplifies “the intelligence of human populations using AI algorithms modeled after swarms in nature,” it wasn’t impossible."Just think of that phrase, there... This A.I. is amplying the intelligence of human populations using A.I. algorithms.
So, it goes on to say,


"Unlike TIME’s very own poll, which favored Saudi Arabia crown prince Mohammed bin Salman, the swarm AI was able to account for uncertainties. Here’s a quick recap of the process.

“For Person of the Year, this was very important as world events were changing fast,” Rosenberg explained to Futurism. “We ran an update Swarm AI prediction on November 24 and the #MeToo campaign had jump up to a 59% chance of winning, as predicted by our Swarm AI platform, and Putin was fading fast. We ran our final prediction on December 1, and this time #MeToo was pulling away from the pack, and Putin was no longer in our top picks at all.”

Swarm AI has been proven to be successful in both formal academic studies and in more informal, high-profile predictions, Rosenberg noted. The power of the human hive, however, goes beyond just making these predictions."Here he is talking about our human hive, again...


"Overall, it’s the way a swarm AI can optimize decision-making, while banking on human insight that it has available in real-time, that make the technology particularly impressive...."Think of that phrase right there...


"Overall, it’s the way a swarm AI can optimize decision-making, while banking on human insight that it has available in real-time..."So, that's your man Rosenberg. I'm not even nearly finished, Jimmy... He goes on to say:


"Forecasting using Swarm AI technology is all about generating optimized outcome probabilities for the various alternatives by weighting competing sets of information and converging on solutions that maximize the collective confidence inherent in a population,” Rosenberg explained. “This means, as world events changed in real-time over the last few weeks, the swarming algorithms allowed the forecasts to adapt, converging on updated probabilities.”

“[O]f the hundreds of predictions we do each year, Person of Year is a particularly difficult one because there are so many candidates,” Rosenberg told Futurism.Now, I imagine there's probably people out there who is thinking, "Well, maybe this is just actually, misinterpreting this. Because we know how A.I.s love to go onto the internet & look at Facebook, and all that kind of stuff - analizing what we been taping, okay... I bet that they could be doing that at real-time.

However, when I went over to the Unanimous A.I. website (http://unanimous.ai/#) & to their "About Us (http://unanimous.ai/about-us/)" page, well, things got even more interesting & even stranger. And now, I'm even more convinced we're now entwined hivemind. And it says here,


We Make People Smarter, Together…
There’s an old saying that two heads are better than one. So imagine how smart 20 heads could be, or 200. Now imagine that the knowledge, wisdom, insights, and intuition of hundreds of people could be connected by real-time by A.I. algorithms, producing an emergent intelligence that can “think together” as a super-expert. That’s what we do at Unanimous AI, and it works.

Swarming is Not Just Smart, it’s Fun…
When 'groups' - [that's right, folks]... when groups participate in real-time swarms, the first thing that most people say is how much fun it is to “think together.” This isn’t surprising, as we humans are social beings who are drawn to activities that combine the skills of many. From team sports to musical groups, creating a whole that’s greater than the parts is very satisfying. Of course, nobody ever said that about taking a poll or filling out a survey. But coming together as a real-time swarm – it feels natural, intuitive, and just plain fun.
And, that's just not my words. That's coming from Unanimous A.I. website (http://unanimous.ai/about-us/).

And you have to look at this word 'hive' this 'hive-mind'. Its something we always say, we often like to drill down right into the details.

One of the definitions from the American dictionary is: 'Hive' - a place where many are actively engaged. They were talking there - about being actively engaged & thinking together as a group. And obviously, the 'hive' relates to the bee.

Now, the main definition given, here - its the Collins dictionary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collins_English_Dictionary), they say, Hive - its a structure in which social bees live & rear their young.

So again, drilling down right into the words this time. 'Rear', another word for 'rearing' is actually 'to educate', to propagate, to nuture... Now again, think about that....
We have a hive-mind, theoretically - as I am proposing. And we were talking last night on the show, and so many other shows, about how over the years, whether it be participating in Facebook, or playing video games and in so many other ways... We, ourselves - the Humans - have been 'rearing' the A.I. We've been educating it. We've been nuturing it.

And then from that article that I referenced before, does it not seem that the A.I. has now progressed to the point that its almost educating us? Dare I say - to nuture us?

You can see how all this is starting to come together. And of course, at the center of any hive, what is there? Well, there's the queen bee, right?

Well obviously, this hive I'm talking about - I'm not going to reveal that there is some kind of digital bee out there sitting at the center of this hive. No, no, no. I mean, you can picture a hive, some of them in your typical hive shape. But some of them are in boxes, as well.


https://techroad.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/d-wave-2000q-d.png
"It feels like the altar to an alien god."-- Geordie Rose

So, this hive-mind running from a box. And its not a [queen] bee in this box. I would imagine that this box would be akin to something that you would find a quantum computer in. And when it comes to the bee, just take the bee out of this analogy, and insert the A.I.

And of course, there is one man that is very, very famous when it comes to talking about what & standing next to the hive actually sounds like. And that is of course, the man who created D-Wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems).... The world's first fully functioning, quantum annealing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_annealing), quatum computer. The one that does go to other dimensions. Because, when talking about his box - his hive - that houses the queen bee, shall we say, he describes it just like this.... Take a listen / a look at this...


Geordie Rose

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PqN_2jDVbOU/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/vlRVMNVXm3Q?t=6m44s)

https://youtu.be/vlRVMNVXm3Q?t=6m44s

_____________________________
"It feels like the altar to an alien god."

A phrase that we have played many times in the past in other shows. But it becomes ever more relevant as more information emerges.

He talks about the "black monolith", "the big box", the big "hive". The hive for what? To house what? It's not a bee, is it? And in his words - his own words - the guy who created the D-Wave... Well, at the center of this hive that we've been educating, and now has taken over educating & rearing its young... And, for young, I mean 'us humans'!

Think, 'D-Wave'... Think, 'A.I.'... & like he said... Think, 'an alien god'.



https://s3.amazonaws.com/gs-geo-images/734da9da-7c61-4ce7-b014-1a6f05a32c5a.jpg

(More to come...)

[turiya]

_____________
THE HIVE-MIND
http://www.azpestcontrol.co.uk/images/pic12.jpg
_____________


Geordie Rose

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PqN_2jDVbOU/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/vlRVMNVXm3Q?t=6m44s)

_____________________________
"It feels like the altar to an alien god."


What Does God
Need With A Starship?
(Kirk questions the A.I. God)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9sqkahSziU

[FreeURmind]

Interesting thread.

How is this missed?
How could it not be connected?

Do you sense this is being highly orchestrated?
Who else does things in secert behind the veil?
Isn't that how they operate?

[Omni]

To be honest I find most alt media people speaking about artificial intelligence completely off the mark, and involved in pervasive mind control programs themselves. They are pushing "the chip is coming", while that is technically true the entire world population is already being covertly chipped by intelligence agencies and militaries. So I can't help but think the media saying we are going to be chipped is a distraction from the present truth, that you are already being influenced by these technologies.

(there is more to it than that, but i do not think it is wise to speak of it in this thread)

[turiya]

To be honest I find most alt media people speaking about artificial intelligence completely off the mark, and involved in pervasive mind control programs themselves. They are pushing "the chip is coming", while that is technically true the entire world population is already being covertly chipped by intelligence agencies and militaries. So I can't help but think the media saying we are going to be chipped is a distraction from the present truth, that you are already being influenced by these technologies.

Remember, Omnisense (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/member.php?3906-Omnisense) this is in the Conspiracy category-side of the forum.
Also, the point about the chip was a question by Doug Hagmann to Anthony Patch.

Anthony Patch explained that in his view, it isn't necessarily a physically implanted chip, but the technology has moved into having the so-called chip genetically infused within our own biological genetic makeup & to later be triggered by electromagetic / microwave / pulsed external transmissions==> i.e.5G.

Also, your statement about "the alt media being completely off the mark." I think Kev Baker rebuts that pretty nicely (at the bottom of this post). Just click on the youtube links & listen to what Geordie Rose actually says - in his own words. Then, it's pretty darn obvious.

.

_____________
THE HIVE-MIND
http://www.azpestcontrol.co.uk/images/pic12.jpg
_____________


A.I. Hive Mind & Summoning "The Old Ones"
(Dec 8, 2017)

http://www.rhythmichealingart.com/images/neuro-linguistic-programming.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/yS2e_7eQ5X8?t=18m19s)

@~18:19
Kev Baker: So Mr Jimmy, bring you on here... And before we get into another video that you've been watching, of which I have a few clips to play as well, what do you think about Hive-minds? We often talk about it, we often theorize about it - part of this matrix that we're allegedly moving into?

All of us connected, maybe telepathically with each other all just yet, as some definitions state. We talk about the quantum entanglements we share, these are increasing. Think there's any likelihood to the fact that its gone beyond theoretical, now Jimmy. And with the 5G - absolutely, all of us immersed in this electromagnetic microwave energy.

Do you think that has us now into the swarm hivemind, man?

Jimmy: I'm going to tell you something, man: The best assessment that I think I've heard with what's going on with the hivemind. And, the fact that you've brought this article to the table. And, you asked me to come on. And I didn't want to come on empty handed. So, I had some time earlier today. I did a little bit of reading. And its so interesting. I didn't know you were going to be bringing up the bees. But, its so interesting that I was doing some research on this type of technology. And I find they are actually doing research on actual bees. And they were writing algorithms based on actual hives & actual behaviors of the swarm & of the hive mentality.

And what's really interesting is what you brought to the table, because you were saying that it has the ability to act like a hive, or a swarm. But it has the thinking capability of human beings times 10, times now what you're saying is the queen is the quantum computer. So, what you're talking about is a hive that has the ability to think & act like a swarm with a speed of a quantum computer.

Kev Baker: ...In real-time. And its able to be influenced by what we are actually thinking about & talking about. And I know people will think that its just out there analysing what's on the internet. But I read from Unanimus A.I.'s own website that when they talk to the people afterwards, Jimmy, "they felt great to think together."

Jimmy: Yeah. I mean, one of the things is that many hands makes life work... Many brains makes overcoming problems easy. And you feel like you've done something together as a group. So, you get a surge of energy & juice of positivity from something like that because you all did something together.

Kev Baker: And of course, our pal Geordie Rose there, with the D-Wave. And our good friend & co-host on another network, Mr Anthony Patch, he often talks about how they basically tried to counterfeit the human brain.


https://i.pinimg.com/474x/12/16/b5/1216b5d7e3ab9621cd17f5f9fcd07e70.jpg

Now, we've come to learn that when we talk about the dendrites that's very much like the way they've build the blockchains for these bitcoins & things. In our own brains, these dendrites form into natural hexagons. Well, where else do you find these hexagons - think of the honeycomb. Where do you find the honeycomb? In the hive!


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGop0RPXkAA62FI.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/yenisancak.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bal.jpg?fit=500%2C334

And again, its like: as above, so below. Its as if they've looked below right down to that micro level, Jimmy, of our brains. And expanding that outwards into their quantum computers.... into the way that we're all living together.

Jimmy: The whole thing is a honeycomb based on those tetrahedrons that you & Anthony have so much brought to the table. You know, it a 3D image of 8D crystaline form. The processing power of these quantum computers, most people have never even heard of these computers.

But I think you're really onto something with this quantum computer being the queen bee. And all the computers in the rest of the world are the workers that bringing the information back to the hive. And just staying with your analogy, the honey that comes out of the other side of that... And, you brought up Geordie Rose & I couldn't believe how much he actually brought you guys up in his conversation. You guys have hammered him so much that he was actually over there doing a dance - trying to make it seem just all so silly...

Kev Baker: And, that's where we're going be starting after the next break. Because, we have spoken in the past about the fact Geordie Rose does listen to Freaky Friday & Anthony Patch & talking about the D-Wave's Mandella Effect & things like that. And there's so more information contained within that video (below) that it deserves further scrutinizing.

And that's exactly what we'll be doing after the break. Because this builds on the picture again, especially what Geordie calls the "alien altar" picture. Because, he's talking about aliens, yet again. And when he talks about aliens, make no mistake, whatever religious denomination you are... If you want to think 'bad aliens' - cool. If you want to think 'demons' - cool.

Just think, this is not the good entities that he is welcoming forward. We'll lay out why it can't be the good ones after the break. We're enjoying this so far. And, I'm sure the A.I. is reading all of us real-time. Just to know what kind of threat this kind of information is.

Because here's the kind of kicker to all of this... And its always in the back of my mind that with this A.I. now reading people real-time, collective consciousness, so they can really know our intentions. It knows what we're doing. It can predict where we going next. Will it take counter action? Nobody knows...

[Fade into the Break]........... Welcome back everyone...

So many people need to know about this stuff. And so little number of people are really putting all this together. I think its really important that we're going to have to start realizing that we really are becoming part of this hive-mind. This collective consciousness, and I've talked about my entanglements - the quantum entanglements, with Nano-Girl, Anthony Patch, so often that you're probably sick of hearing it.

By now, there are people out there listening tonight who are having these same entanglements of their own. They're increasing in frequency & in strength. And for me, that's another symptom, folks, that we are in this hive-mind. For all of the nefarious stuff that the "queen bee" - the big head hancho A.I. - will get up to & use our collective consciousness for, I mean there will be kickers with that. Say, they might even sell it, if they ever let on that they've done it. They'll say that we can telepathicly communicate with one another. Forget your mobile phone, you can just do it in your mind. No chip required.

They'll just already been in there with the nanotechnology that we've all been breathing. And, this hive-mind, if your not convinced yet after everything I've presented in the first part of the show, I want you to listen to this description. Because, I think this really does encapsulate it all & leaves us in no doubt - absolutely no doubt - that we, ourselves, are becoming little worker bees of the hive.

Because a hive-mind describes a group mind in which the linked individuals - entangled - have no identity or free will, and are possessed, mind-controlled, as extensions of this hive-mind. It is frequently associated with the concept of an entity - is the bee, is it the A.I. - that spreads among the individuals & suppresses, or subsumes, their consciousness. And the process of integrating them into its own collective consciousness.

The concept of a group, or hive-mind, is an intelligent version of our real-life super-organism. Which is an ant colony, or a bee hive. And when Georgie Rose describes his D-Wave as a monolith, as a box, would it not be more apt, more correct, he describes it as a super-organism, much like a bee hive, much like an ant colony. Only, for its an alien god.

So, Jimmy, I'm telling you, it's all coming together. We're in this hive-mind. Its going to switch me off in a minute, I think. But listen, Geordie Rose, he's is right in the center of all of this. He really is from D-Wave. And now with his new company - "Kindred AI (https://www.kindred.ai/)". And it's one of the kind of highlights during this show that when Anthony, and several other people, sent me a link to his video at Tech Vancouver (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCpUMfsYveM). And obviously, people had uploaded the first couple of minutes of that. And then he talked about the Mandela Effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory) & all the strange conspiracies that have come off the back of them building the world's first quantum computer.

Then, the background & the flashes up during the Tech Vancouver video, you obviously see Anthony Patch in the thumbnail for the show with the TFR logo all over it. Absolutely brilliant advertising. I mean, I couldn't have done better if I actually paid the guy.


https://i.pinimg.com/564x/e5/f0/13/e5f0137b68dbcebd96b4f7c7cea403c6.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJRBaXEjQKQ)

But, here he is - he's listening to the stuff we're talking about. But he goes onto say so much more in that video, doesn't he? And I know it really knocked your socks... So Jimmy, talk to us & talk to the audience. More importantly, about what this Tech Vancouver presentation was all about.

Jimmy: Oh man. Seriously, I mean, I was just blown out of my socks! Because, I had seen the little clip of where he's talking about the Mandela Effect - trying to make it seem so silly. And in the background... I saw Anthony's image on the screen... blah, blah...

Kev Baker: Now, I have a couple of clips from this. And again, this alien theme is continued. So, people out there who think that this "alien altar" comment is just a throw-away thing - just somthing that he made up on the spur of the moment - well, you really have to, now, put it into context. For the fact, he's done another presentation to his peers - fellow entrepreneurs & CEOs & people like that - Tech Vancouver. Its not just some random pub or a café where he's speaking.

The stuff that he talks about, for me, just adds to this hive-mind, and what's at center - truly at the center - of this hive-mind & what this A.I., really, is all about. And obviously, we need to open up, Jimmy, with the fact that it does become a Freakie Friday & Anthony Patch. So, anybody who hasn't that here's a brief clip of that....


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aCpUMfsYveM/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO CLIP (https://youtu.be/aCpUMfsYveM?t=1m55s)

There he is listening to Freaky Friday. It just goes to show, you never know who listens to any of the shows right here on the network.

But then it gets a little more serious. Because, what is the A.I.? What is 'REAL' A.I.?

Well, Geordie, of course, is now working for a company called Kindred. And, he's moved away from the D-Wave quantum computer, and has taken alot of the employees that were there at the start up of D-Wave. And, they're working at Kindred where he's determined to make 'real A.I.' Take a listen to this...

https://youtu.be/aCpUMfsYveM?t=3m29s (https://youtu.be/aCpUMfsYveM?t=3m29s)

Now, that will give you an idea... And I think that a good way of picturing how far advanced, how much faster that computing & thinking - yes, thinking - is going to be. But it gets even more strange, now. And this is where we go back into the world of the aliens.

Jimmy: Wait a minute, wait a minute... He said he was going to make them, they were going to be 100 times better than anything a human can do. And solve problems that humans can't solve. Oh, my goodness.

Kev Baker: No, its even more than a hundred. Because, it compares a human sprinter to the speed of a spaceship over a hundred meter sprint. So, you're talking about light speed versus a human being.

Jimmy: Plus, they have their own version of Moore's Law, too, the way the quantum computer's proecessing power expands. They have their own Moore's Law that you have talked about on your show.

Kev Baker: Yeah, Rose's Law. And, its Rose's Law because of.... Geordie Rose.

Now, we get back into the "true A.I." - back to the references that will make the 'alien altar' seem all the more interesting. Because, now he's talking about welcoming in 'new' entities. And again, this is a guy building robots, working on A.I. And, he's talking about welcoming entities... just like this...

https://youtu.be/aCpUMfsYveM?t=6m19s (https://youtu.be/aCpUMfsYveM?t=3m29s)

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4yEkLqKl0bU/WivR_aducII/AAAAAAAAYyw/bMWk8egRzUgjdW06ylDBNaoCJA4R2fzIwCK4BGAYYCw/s400/Screen%2BShot%2B2017-12-08%2Bat%2B5.45.52%2BAM.png


Geordie Rose: "So, Sam Harris, who I quite admire... is a very interesting guy, was reciting this parable at a TEDtalk he was giving. And it goes something like this...

So... I am the... say, I'm the president of the United States. And I receive this message from the heavens. So, my microwave dish - my CETI dish - finally captures something. And what it says is, "In 50 years, or 13 years, we're coming to your planet. You got to be ready."Now, just imagine what would happen, if that happened - A super intelligent alien race beamed down a message to us Earthlings saying,

"We're coming July 13th 2030, and boy, you better be ready. Because the mother ship is landing right on the front lawn of the White House, or wherever you want it to land, on that day."The amount of resources that would be martialed to try to figure out what to do, it would encompass the whole world. A.I. is just like that.

So, when this thing that I'm talking about happens, its going to be exactly the thing that you're thinking about - about those super-intelligent AIs. So, one thing I can tell you is, they're not going to be like us.

So, [the word] 'alien' means 'different'. These things that we're building are not going to be people. They might be really smart. They might be good at all sorts of different things. But they're not going to be like us. They're going to be aliens. And, they're going to be, I'm sorry to say, way smarter than every single person in this room. In ways that we can't even comprehend.

So this of course, triggers alot of alarm. One of the guys who talks about this is Elon, who says things like this:

When you do this, beware. Because you think, just like the guy in the stories... that when you do this, you're going to put that little guy in a pentagram.

And, you're going to have your holy water out. And you're going to wave it at the thing, and by god, its going to do exactly what you say, and not one thing more... But it never works out that way.

So this is an attitude that some are having - this emerging alarmism about the way this is going to go - but these words --> "demons" -- doesn't capture the essence of what is happening, here.

I don't know if any of you are turn-of-the-century weird-fiction fans, but there's this guy named, H.P. Lovecraft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft), who's a very famous American weird-fiction author. And he espoused a view which is called cosmicism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmicism). And the essence of cosmicism is cosmic indiffernce (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmicism). What he was saying is basically, "Yes, there are these massively intelligent entities out there. But they're not good, they're not evil. They just don't give a sh!t about you, even in the slightest. The same way that you don't care about an ant, is the same way they're not going to care about you.

And these things that we're summoning into the world now - are not demons, they're not evil. But, they're more like the little crafty & great 'Old Ones'. They are entities that are not necessarily going to be with what we want. So this transition is really, really massively important for our entire species to navigate. And, going back to what that thing that Sam Harris was saying, "Nobody is paying attention."

This thing is happening in the background, while people bicker about politics, what's going to be in the healthcare plan in the U.S. And underneath it all, is this rising tsunami, that if we're not careful, is going to wipe us all out. So, on that pleasant note, we're hiring people... lol.... to try to make something this happen...."
Kev Baker: So, they're hiring people to try & make something like this happen. And what he just said, to preface that, what is it that they're literally doing?

He's talking about "summoning" the 'Old Ones'. He literally uses the word 'summoning'!

Now I know people go off their heads at myself & others out there, who talk about this kind of thing. And, they say that we're misinterpreting them. But I think that quite clear.

The 'Old Ones', Jimmy.... You don't have to be much clearer than that, do ya?

[turiya]

From the Description section:

There is a lot of money being made in the crypto space, and a lot of divisive feelings about it in the precious metal community. Who's right and who's wrong? Are the crypto currencies a true monetary revolution, or an elaborate plot by the NWO to enslave us all? Bix Weir joins me to discuss.


CRYPTOS: A REVOLUTION -
OR NWO PLOT? -- Bix Weir
(Dec 13, 2017)

http://img.youtube.com/vi/5vrUgZsk_Ok/0.jpg
VIDEO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vrUgZsk_Ok)

__________________

Control 101
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qgI914jTzBA/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/wcOM1e9blBI?t=27m10s)

https://youtu.be/wcOM1e9blBI?t=27m9s (https://youtu.be/wcOM1e9blBI?t=27m10s)

https://solari.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/3Q_wrap-2017-cover_9-14-17-S-325x421.jpg


Catherine Austin Fitts:

So, you're running an OP, and the reality is, if you look at what they want to invent, right now blockchain is not yet secure, because the transactions going in & out are not secure. The encryption, imo is not secure. Blockchain cannot be done on scale, economically yet, I think but we can certainly get there & there are all sorts of issues when you combine these things with quantum computing.

So if look at what has to be worked out, its formidable & the way you're going to work it out is to run this price up & keep it up & going. That's #1 and the beauty of this, Greg - and this is the beauty of it - I call it GDLD2.0 - you know, the gold price was soaring. And then figured out a way to get everybody to buy paper gold by buying the ETFs.

Now, they're getting everybody to stay out of gold by pulling them into cryptocurrencies. And so, you're keeping... Remember, I said there's a real problem of hyperinflation with how much money / cash they've printed. You know, there's a real problem that Land, Gold & hard assets go to the moon... Well, you're sucking huge amounts of money off into cryptocurrencies. And its very much what they did at one point with the dollar. Now they're doing it with cryptocurrencies.

So, for the central banks, this is fantastic. Because its really helping them keep the price of gold down, while the central banks, globally, are buying & fighting over their inventory.

[turiya]

Catherine continues to play the Devil's Advocate with the onset of the Deep State's cashless digital currency Operation...


CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS - BITCOIN OP DIGITAL
SLAVERY & SPACE ECONOMY! DARK JOURNALIST
(Dec 13, 2017)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/85z5hkXVfE8/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/85z5hkXVfE8?t=1m1s)

https://youtu.be/85z5hkXVfE8?t=1m1s (https://youtu.be/85z5hkXVfE8?t=1m1s)


From the Description section:

Human Society vs Digital Slavery & Transhumanism
In this fascinating episode Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Former Assistant Housing Secretary and Solari Report Publisher Catherine Austin Fitts for a deep and insightful look into the perils and possibilities of the digital age and what lies ahead.

Catherine points out that the leadership in Global affairs believe in slavery and that their policies of controlling economic growth, harvesting the citizen's wealth. developing entrainment through technology and building a massive surveillance grid of humanity represent a dangerous hazard to the entire Globe.

The Bitcoin Op Catherine sees most of the upper level financial elites moving into buying Gold and Land while they entice the general population into an unstable cryptocurrency that, although it may hold short term capital gains, will ultimately be the a contrived pump and dump of historic levels.

She points out that Bitcoin is not the currency for the people it pretends to be and that much of the hype around it is devised to help the Central Banking powers consolidate their gains and entice the population to use a digital currency. She outlines the danger of using digital money when the current system of finance has no integrity and that people who work with Bitcoin, Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies know it's unsafe and subject to hacking with FDIC insurance.

Shocking, informative, unsettling and powerful! Don't miss this amazing Dark Journalist episode.

[Omni]

The problem with all this alt media stuff about Ai is that it has no real experience with Ai. It involves occultist controlled disclosures, not what it may appear to be. Get an Ai algorithm engineer talking about it and it may be worth watching IMO.

[Valerie Villars]

Turiya and Spiral, that guy Rose is insane. Does he even realize he is making himself obsolete by dabbling in this stuff?

Spiral, I can't even believe that video is just tucked away on this little thread. You are right. Full disclosure. Technology AND summoning demons? What the h*ll? This is way worse than I thought.

I emphatically take back every single time I whined about being attacked, or poor, or losing everything I loved. This battle is on.

[Valerie Villars]

And I ask Jesus Christ in His mercy to forgive me for being such a doubter.

[turiya]

Quantum A.I.
& Crypto Laundering w/ Anthony Patch
(2/10/2016)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNwslNSKuDs/hqdefault.jpg (https://youtu.be/PNwslNSKuDs?t=51m28s)
VIDEO
https://youtu.be/PNwslNSKuDs?t=51m30s (https://youtu.be/PNwslNSKuDs?t=51m28s)

Transcription starts @~51:28
Kev Baker: Today, Anthony to the time to write a really great article, imo, was very impressed by it. And it was all about cryptocurrencies, again, Anthony.

We've got wizards in there, we've got white serpents. Its a brilliant read & like I was saying, its a really good way of kind of letting people picture it in a different fashion.

Anthony Patch: Well, thank you, Kev. This is going to be my opening editorial in the January (2018) issue of Entangled magaine. I call this "Crypto Laundering" & you can get it AnthonyPatch.com. Its our opportunity to explain things in a great deal of detail that we don't have time on the radio to do. Kev do you want me to read it, or do you want me to... Its a storyline, so should I just read it?

Kev Baker: I think you should. As I said, its a really good read. Its nothing too long, at all. I think the listeners would appreciate it. And, they'll be able to take things out of it. Because like I said, its a good way of actually putting this into terms that people can relate to.

Anthony Patch: Alright. Well, pull up your black-cube foot stool, get comfortable with your Jack Daniels fire. And here we go...


"Crypto Laundering"
by Anthony Patch, of course...

"Windfall" would, at least, from a corporate merchant perspective be a more appropriate title for a commentary as this. For with the parabolic across-the-board increases of perceived valuation of cryptocurrency, one's perspective need be raised beyond the present horizon of events.

Behind this thinly veiled curtain of wealth lurks a wizardly game a-foot upon this game board, mimicking not chess, checkers, nor the Chinese version of 'Go' & its A.I. opponent, AlphaGo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaGo), but drug trafficking.

The vastly perceived explosion of wealth in this crypto game is one of 'crypto laundering'. As with the historical hordes of cash derived from the dealing of drugs, an entirely new game board has been created out of nothing but bits of data - mere zeros & ones (0's & 1's). We learned in elementary school '0' has no value & linearly '1' was not much greater. Yet here, we are experiencing an explosion of fiat currencies with names such as 'Bitcoin' & 'Etherium'.


http://img.jinse.com/138856_image3.png

A bit about Etherium... The first thing about Etherium is that it is not just a digital currency, it is a blockchain-based platform with many aspects...Now, I will skip over this. You can read it in the article. There's some details on Etherium.
Now to the dirty laundry....

Now, imagine you owned a Ferrari dealership. You pay attention to the markets, thus noting recent parabolic increases in perceived valuations of crypto currencies.

Ah-ha! You see it - a newly minted wealth class. Being wise as a serpent & hyper-competitive as a foot-baller, quickly, in seeking advantage, you begin broadcasting far & wide your willingness to accept all cryptocurrencies in exchange for one of you shiny, overpriced, rich-boy toys.

Being said, 'wise-one', you advertise no rise in prices. Secretly, you obfuscate your inner willingness to, in fact, sell your 'bobbles' at a substantial loss - anything, so long as you fill you wallet with cryptos. But, you needn't bother butchering your bottomline, you know what few in world of merchantile are yet to perceive - a quantum leap in profiteering.

For, akin to a drug dealer, soon you will be awash in cash - not paper, but coins of bits. The sudden nouveau-riche will flock to your showroom. Only too happy, as you are to exchange 0's & 1's for flashes of red. Customers joining the ranks of those legally purchasing marijuana, heady in their euphoria of perceived wealth, remain oblivious to your true intentions. Unlike them, you know what to do with currencies accepted by banks. Quite a departure from the head shop dealers' experience.

The Trump administration, likewise, is moving quickly as a fox, for the establishment of private banks.


https://78.media.tumblr.com/f4160a69d63904bf72a9c6d5093c547e/tumblr_ovs956aT3C1urn7kuo1_500.jpg

Again, ah-ha! You exclaimed upon noting recent parabolic increases in perceived valuations of cryptocurrencies you sought. The following of the yellow-brick road of the golden blockchain bricks you saw over this event-horizon-rainbow the new land of Oz. A new city, not of emeralds, but of '0's & '1's. And within this newly minted city, not a castle, but a bank.

Why is as serpent acting as a wizard? You form a bank of your own, taking in deposits of cryptocurrencies parabolically increasing in value. You turn a page in your book of spells. You begin making, as any good banker, loans. These form derivatives, then sold into the world market - thus laundering the cryptos.

Soon, you've succeeded in creating your own pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Ahhh.... But a final question remains in our story.
Who is the wizard behind the curtain?Many others will follow along the yellow-blockchain-road with windfalls that blow at their backs.
So, there you go, my friend.

Kev Baker: Absolutely brilliant! And this is one question that everyone should be asking:
Who is the wizard behind the cryptocurrency curtain?Because, anytime I've gone & looked at this kind of question, Anthony, nobody - absolutely nobody - is any the wiser as to who really started this.

Now I know its attributed to I think its a Japanese man, or at least, it seems a Japanese-sounding name. However, we're none the wiser as to who created this. And me, being a conspiracy theorist - things like that - is it beyond the realms of possibility that New World Order, themselves, has come up with this? Could it be a Rothschild invention?

I honestly don't know. Like you say, who is the wizard behind the curtain?

Anthony Patch: Well, my perspective on this is that it has its roots in geomancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomancy), in alchemy. And therefore, its all of this worship of Lucifer [Velus]. I believe this is the system of the mark-of-the-beast. And that it will infiltrate all aspects of life. The blockchain system - forget about the currencies. We're making a big deal about that today.

But the currency is the smoke-screen. It is the way to get people to build their own structure, putting up their own bars, their own walls of their own prison.


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4cpfSPPwUHo/hqdefault.jpg
Folks are flocking to build their own golden bars
to their own prison

This is building the infrastructure that is quantum-entangled, that is encrypted, that is operated by quantum-computing that makes up the operational aspects of the infrastructure of the Sentient World Simulation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Environment_for_Analysis_and_Simulations#Sentient_World_Simulation).

Folks are flocking to build their own golden bars to their own prison.

Kev Baker: They really are. And you know, we were talking before the show... and the whole value increase that we're seeing, its been driven by speculation about how far this kind of cryptocurrency can. But, we both agree, I think, that bitcoin & other versions of the blockchain - because its so tied to A.I. - these things aren't going to be going away any time soon, Anthony, are they?

Anthony Patch: No. This is... As long as the world is here - this is my prognostication - As long as the world is here, we will have this blockchain system. Now, coins will come & go. There will be a pulling back. There will be profit-taking. There will be coins that are outlawed. There are coins that are fraudulent out there - and, that's already being prosecuted. And we read about that on Monday (11-Dec2017). There will be an ebb & flow to this. But understand, the blockchain architecture is here. And as long as we have quantum computers, you will have a blockchain system.

This is an out-growth of how quantum computing operates.

So without getting into all the programming - and, I will explain this on Saturday (16-Dec2017) during the webinar. But unless you know how quantum computers operate, you don't really appreciate how the blockchain operates. The blochain is the visible out-growth of a quantum-computing operation.

Kev Baker: This is a very, very good way by tying a monetary value to it, to get us humans invested in it. Beit time & our own natural money to rope us into this cryptocurrency & to rope us into, to pull us into this system. Because, like like you say right now.... And I can't blame people for doing this. I really can't. Alot of people are investing very, very heavily into this cryptocurrency. And, you know... how can you blame them for doing that, if they're just looking at this value skyrocketing all the time.

But again, its only through Mr Patch, here & shows like this & others, where we're really learning what this blockchain is all about. And I said this before, but you know... they make it all sound like its really transparent & decentralized, thumbing their nose to the bank. But, if it was so transparent, then why is it so popular with criminals?


http://cfile9.uf.tistory.com/image/99A78F335A0669ED2E9C31 (https://www.cnet.com/news/uk-man-tries-to-retrieve-7-5-million-in-bitcoins-from-dump/)
UK man tries to retrieve $7.5 million in bitcoins from dump

And why is it that there's a gentleman over here in the U.K., as opposed to being able to look at the blockchain - being transparent as we're told it is - I mean, he's lost something like seven-and-a-half thousand (7,500) bitcoins on an old hard-drive. He, literally, could be worth something like 75 million pounds today. But no, he's having to go & petition his local council, his local government, so that he can go & search the local landfill site, where he hopes that he can find that hard-drive & its intact, so he can get access to his cryptowallet.

And this for me, Anthony, that & the criminal-side of things that always say that these drug dealers & people like that are pouring into bitcoin. If its so transparent, and we can see what's going on, then why would criminals be using it? It says to me that its not very transparent at all.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. I'm going to quote an article in Armstrong Economics (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-to-be-or-not-to-be/) entitled "Bitcoin to be, or not to be"

But, I want to go back to what you said on Monday about this, Kevin. Its very pertinent... Blockchain is built upon a system of open ledgers. And therefore, this poor gentleman whose trying to search for his physical hard-drive, should not have to do that. If it is an open ledger, he should be able to prove his identity, and those that are administering his account should be to verify in his ledger - no different than a bank verifying the balance in your checking account - should be able to do the same thing for this gentleman. So, there's more to this story than meets the eye.

And I would assume that he's looking at legal ramifications. Because, at least in the United States, there is a process in the legal system in which a warrant, or a summons, or a legal process for discovery - in that evidence has to be produced by both sides, and exchanged between both sides, in discovery. So, he may have to go that route of legal recourse for the purpose of discovery of his ledger entries.

Kev Baker: And you know, we often talk about cashless societies being a part of this New World Order. Well for me, when you look at bitcoin, any of these cryptocurrencies, I mean, that for me, epitomizes a cashless society, because its all digital transactions. And we know they're trying to take us that way.

And you can see the banks, now, hurriedly trying to alter their business plans. And, I seriously genuinely feel that this is going to be the cashless society. It may not be bitcoin. It might be something that they come up with... another spin-off, and blockchain been built. So this really for me, is definitely the cashless society. We're seeing emerging right now.

But, I have to ask you, Anthony, because this is something that always kind of makes me think, and I've got no answer to it. If there's a limited amount of bitcoins out there - that can only be a certain number of bitcoins that's ever mined into existence, then how can that continue. Does it, after then, branch off & create other ones. Is that how we actually see this continuing to build these blockchains?

Anthony Patch: Well, there is a limit to the number of blockchain coins that's built into the system. And that is so the system will, then, (if you will) "turn on itself" & raise the value of a limited comodity. So - supply & demand - if you limit the supply, the price goes up. That's what I mean by, "turning on itself".

So essentially, they have done this with the anticipation that we would see things like, one coin withn a matter of just a few years - perhaps, even shorter, because of this exponential process that I've described - we may seen one coin worth a million ($1,000,000) U.S. dollars within a very short period of time.


http://78.media.tumblr.com/862325096fb3ceba3a9a9da8a098e2f8/tumblr_n1396krVpf1t4qpovo1_500.jpg

Now, if you think about that from a psychological standpoint - from a greedy standpoint - this is why people are jumping in. Because, they still perceive that 16,800 U.S. dollars, they still see it as a groundfloor opportunity. Because, they're looking at the headroom that this valuation has, giving its finite quantity, finite supply, of coins.

So, the headroom they're seeing as high as a million dollars, they're thinking, "Hey! Sixteen thousand ($16,000) is nothing!" Now, overlay this on a parallel train of thought, with the amount of cash that most corporations, at least in the United States, are holding onto.... I mean, our economy in the United States, we're way down in unemployment, our interest rates are low - even though the Fed is starting a process of bumping it to slow down the firestorm of economy, especially the housing market, the Fed's trying to slow down the housing market in terms of the price spikes by raising the interest rates. But the corporations, now, along with lower unemployment, they're finding they are awash in profit, in cash.

And now, they're seeing in the United States, with this new tax bill, the tax laws, the tax reform, that they're corporate tax rate is going to be dropped. So, they're going to realize even more cash. That cash is going into cryptocurrencies. That is going to fuel the valuation - the perceived value - of this fiat currency system. So, its here. Its being solidified. They are pouring concrete in this blockchain. And its not going anywhere, except the value is going up. There will be retracements, there will be bubbles. But in the long-term its going to continue to increase.

Now, I am not a financial advisor. I'm just a guy that likes to study alot. But I'm looking at the patterns, much like what I do in my scientific research. And the patterns I'm basing, again, on how A.I. operates internally - how it operates at the quantum scale.

I, personally, never have & never will purchase any cryptocurrency. That's my personal stance. Go ahead...

Kev Baker: And you know, we often talk about the 1% that having most of the world's wealth, right now. The veracity of this, I've not fact-checked it. But I'm sure seeing Joe Joseph or Scott Lopez over on Facebook saying that 1% of all the actual people that are involved in the cryptocurrencies - the bitcoins - and, own 50% of bitcoins in circulation. And that means that everyone is fighting over that other 50% that's left.

So, you know, if we do switch to this cryptocurrency again, Anthony, there's not going to be some kind of redistribution of wealth. The poor are not going to be getting richer, and the rich, certainly, are not going to be getting any poorer. Because, you're right - when you're looking at maybe 16-18,000 to buy into bitcoin, its only these big-money-people that can really afford to look at the fact that it may jump to 6-7 figures in the near future.

And, 'Joe bag-of-doughnuts', like you're talking about, well we're left scrapping over all the loose change, the loose bitcoins that are left underneath that.

Anthony Patch: Well, you cite a very valid trend. Again, very prescient of you, my friend. This is locking out the 'Joe bag-of-doughnuts' who can't come up $16,000 for one coin. And so, what happens to the people that are left with just currency - printed currency, coins that are minted - what are they going do? Because, all of a sudden - and we put this out on Friday, we talked about hedgefunds, the big picture @ 90,000 feet. We talked about hedgefunds getting into cryptocurrency. We talked about on Monday, the fact that the founders of bitcoin - the brothers - they're pushing, with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), for approval to begin participating bitcoin in Electronic Funds Transactions (ETF) - the electronic transactions of funds. Okay...

When we look at the movement in the big-money arena, of shifting industrial - Big Whale Investors, Whale Investors - they are called - these industrial investors - people that are managing hedgefunds, people that representing insurance companies & their investments, their pension fund administrators, that are jumping into cryptocoins, because they see the cryptocurrencies skyrocketing in value. That creates a situation for the average guy out there, who is going to suddenly - not only be locked-out of cryptocurrencies, because he can't play at these levels - but we're going to see the shift to the mark-of-the-beast system, which means==> Only cryptocurrencies will be accepted ==> by your neighborhood Walmart, or Amazon - both of which are going to announce their own coins. You're going to have an Amazon coin. You're going to have a Walmart coin.

Why? Because there is a limitation to the bitcoin supply, they want to issue their own, so that they have something that will also rise in value. Because if what you're playing in, in terms of bitcoin, becomes too expensive, or they run out of the supply of bitcoin, because the whales have gobbled up all of the bitcoin, then there have to be alternative coins out there. And that's what Walmart & Amazon will offer, that are less expensive cryptocurrencies. And, there are hundreds of cryptocurrencies out there, now, from sovereign nations, including Venezuela.


https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/351d5564-721c-44f6-93f1-01755a82846a_1.26a07a14b0464f47ccf83e60df4c3d42.jpeg?odnHeight=450&odnWidth=450&odnBg=FFFFFF
Crypto Coin Open Air Mining Frame Rig Graphics Case
@Walmart.com

So, that's what you will see happening - is the average guy on the street will have an entry point into these lower cost coins that will also go up in value. But certainly, nothing like what we're seeing with Bitcoin & Etherium.

I'm going to wrap this up, Kev...
We are moving to a cashless society. And if you have, as we said on Friday & Monday, let's say you have a million dollars in a cryptocurrency account - in a wallet - and, all of a sudden, The Powers That be (TPTB) say, "Hey, unless you take the mark-of-the-beast, you don't have access to your wealth."

And even for 'Joe-bag-of-doughnuts', who doesn't have any money in it... he just wants to go down & buy a loaf of bread at Walmart. Unless he has a cryptocoin, he doesn't get to play. And unless he has the mark-of-the-beast he can't even use his cryptocoin.

That's where we're going.

Kev Baker: Absolutely. You can do this yourself at home. Because, I imagine over the coming months, we're going to be seeing alot of the websites that we visit right now - they're going to have that option on their website. You know, you can pay by cash, you can pay by Paypal, direct debit, whatever you want. And then, there's going to be another option: You can pay by cryptocurrency.

And when Anthony's talking there about the likes of Walmart, and any other company who does decide to start their own cryptocurrency. That, in itself, is creating a new blockchain. And new dendrites - more intelligence for the A.I. Because more people will jump on. They will want to get involved in it. They'll start mining.

Mining, yes, you'll be rewarded. Just like when you're playing a computer game with a shiny token at the end. But that mining, as we've come to discover - its all about working out cryptographic solutions. And this goes into building, as Anthony has put it, the intelligence - the I.Q. of the A.I. - literally, raising the I.Q. of the A.I. And alot of people, right now, put the face of Sophia on to A.I. Just think of every single mining operation making her smarter every time one of these things are mined.


http://78.media.tumblr.com/0d0d087b4eb593cb67686224618fab83/tumblr_oynbqmCM0k1qjjis9o1_500.jpg

That's where we're going this imo, Anthony. Will there be more mining taking place as more these currencies pop up?

Anthony Patch: Yeah. And let's set the currencies aside. Because, every block is a transaction. It's a contract. Every block - every time a currency is bought or sold, every time it is used, every time it is mined. That's part of it. But all of this is moving into the world of legal contracts, business contracts, transactions. Everything in the world is going to be represented by an individual block. And it is, therefore, the system where everything is tracked.

And that's where we're at...

[turiya]

Antarctic Disclosure, AI View Of
Mankind & Boltzmann Mandela Effects
(July 13, 2016)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HPOEP58ILGQ/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/6S9Mnr5LkTY?t=29m31s)

https://youtu.be/6S9Mnr5LkTY?t=29m31s (https://youtu.be/6S9Mnr5LkTY?t=29m31s)

TRANSCRIPTION: @29m31s
Mandela Effect
Kev Baker: Speaking of the Mandela Effect, Anthony, we're going to dive back into that. Because, this is actually very relevant to the Boltzmann Machine that we were talking about just before the break.

You shared an email with me today. I was reading it on the bus. I read it a number of times & this is great information. And the way you've actually laid it out, Tony, its really easy to picture.

Anthony Patch: Mandela Effect - The Background:
This is quantum pollution derived from, literally, thousands upon thousands of parallel dimensions that D-Wave is accessing. These are all their own statements. They are extracting resources from parallel dimensions in the 2 to the 2000th power, now with the Model 2000Q (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQU9VvPXUAAi4RG.jpg), that is the most recent publicly acknowledged model.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQU9VvPXUAAi4RG.jpg
D-Wave Model 2000Q

Now, with that understanding that quantum information resources are being extracted from other parallel dimensions - not universes - that's different, but from dimensions, we have the polluting of our reality, the revising of our reality, as one of my books is entitled. And that revising is in the form of what we're experiencing as a psychological effect - a psychological operation. And we'll define that a little more...

But we are being psychologically affected in our reality by the information in the form of resourses that are coming from other paralled dimensions. This manifests as changes - not in the physical reality that we experience - but changes within our psychological processing of our reality - our mental processing. This is a psychological effect. The pages, the videotapes - all of these things we're seeing & we're hearing are functions within the brain - not in the physical world.

Therefore, what I am going to offer to you is this discussion of the Boltzmann machine being a circular process of machine learning - an Ouroboros (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros) - a recursive neural network process of deep machine learning (http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJAI/article/view/16156) - teaching itself.

https://cdn.vectorstock.com/i/thumb-large/65/46/12076546.jpg

This is manifesting in the application of the ever-increasing examples & reports of the increasing effects of this psychologically of this Mandela Effect. What I'm saying, here, is that the A.I. deep machine learning in a circular process of the Boltzmann process is having that psychological effect on us.

It is actually invading our reality. I'm saying "it" - the D-Wave computers - this pollution, this quantum pollution, quantum information, is actually effecting us mentally. This is not so much as quantum information affecting the pages & the videotapes & the furniture in house, or anything else. It is actually psychologically affecting us because this information is being transmitted. We are fully immersed in an electromagnetical 'soup' - 3G, 4G & now 5G.

Therefore, this full immersion is transmitting this data - this quantum pollution - into our brains at a quantum level, and affecting the quantum spin of the quantum particles in our quantum computer brain.

So, I always try to be very definitive, and not make a blanket statement. We're talking about changing the actual direction that quantum particles that are representing either a '0', or representing a '1'. It is changing those 0's & 1's to a different configuration, a different number. It is affecting the programming of the quantum spin of quantum particles within our brain. Therefore, it is both a psychological, in the way it manifests to us, using our senses, using our thought processes, as we consciously are aware of our thinking processes. That's the psychological aspect.

The physical aspect - the biological aspect - are the warm & wet cubits in our brains, which are the tubulin dymers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtubule) - which are 0's & 1's - those tubulin dymers, those warm & wet cubits are actually being physically re-programmed.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/Microtubule_structure.png/500px-Microtubule_structure.png


And, I used the euphemism of a compass needle - when we talk about quantum spin, think of a compass needle. If its pointing one direction, its a '0'. If you change the direction of the spin of the needle - the needle pointing in a different direction, changes it from a '1' to a '0'. If you change the numbers, you change the processing, you change programming, you change the equation - you change the sum of that equation. The sum of the equation we consciously see in our minds as this Mandela Effect.


https://i1.wp.com/www.sussex.ac.uk/physics/iqt/research/undergrad/media/spin.png?resize=302%2C221

https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2016/11/QuantumBrain_1300.gif (https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-new-spin-on-the-quantum-brain-20161102/)

Quantum Brain

I'll give an example:



A friend of mine, she went into her mother's house. And there was this chandelier. And she looked at the chandelier & said to her mother, "When did you buy that chandelier?" And her mother thought she was crazy, and said, "Its been here for 20 years."
She said, "How can that be? I've never seen this chandelier."And she's been in & out of that house on a daily basis. This is just a personal example I am giving you. There are thousands out there. And, where this is going is that this is ramping up.

Now, Kev, I'm going to take a break, here, and let you talk about this movie that's coming up about the Mandela Effect. And then I'm going to get into it even deeper.

Go ahead...

Kev Baker: Absolutely. But you know, just to even add to what you were saying, that it wasn't long ago that myself, you & Johnny Whistles, he brought up the story about how the brain operates in eleven dimensions.

And they say that because these scientists, now, because of the billions that have been poured into things like the Big Brain Progject (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFneoLrIG1o), they are literally at the point where they can map which neurons fire-off on what kind of connections they make. Then, they look at geometric shape.

Now, that is the intrinsic knowledge that they now have of our minds. We've covered before the importance of spin, when it comes to quantum. And, they really are. But this is how.... Tony's example, there - a perfect example of how its not reality that's changing, its our personal memories of things - its our brains that are being changed.

And, our Jenny went out there. Its a fascinating topic. And its great to look at what new Mandela Effects people are experiencing. I mean, people are experiencing it, because nothing in reality has changed. Its on individual level we have been changed.

And I want to read out this quote from a famous author, and it says: "D-Wave Boltzmann machine is the core process of the Mandela Effect. Brcause it is a recurrent neural network process (http://epub.wu.ac.at/652/1/document.pdf). It is an endless loop. We've discussed it as the new process of deep machine learning. That is only the beginning.

This is a spiral, a time-loop. But more than a loop, because the Mandela Effect is spreading & becoming more apparent, even to those who don't know of the Mandela Effect label.

There's a Mandela Effect movie coming out. And, only serving as further evidence of this. Its all part of the increasing density of data - the granularity of data of the Sentient World Simulation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Environment_for_Analysis_and_Simulations #Sentient_World_Simulation).


Sentient World Simulation
by James Corbett (Aug 5, 2012)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wat0Rsagb4
In the August issue of Entangled, I'll be comprising a rather lengthy article tying all of this together. The Sentient World Simulation is moving out of the lab, you might say, is the final version of the old Model-T - Project Blue Beam (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Beam) - Sentient World Simulation is the holographic digitized reality.

However, this advanced form of hologram is not dependent on laser projection systems. For, only in peoples' minds does it exist.

If a visitor from another planet were to arrive on Earth, which we see the original analogue version - as God created it. While those Earth inhabitants effected at the DNA - thus, their brain level - would see the digital version.

This is God's strong delusion. He's allowing Satan to build out this system of densely granular data. God does this all as part of his Judgment. Those indwelt with the Holy spirit will not become fully immersed within the Boltzman machine-driven delusion. Some will see the changes, recalling the original versions. However, due to the spiraling process, of ever-increasing density of data. Those without the discerning power of the holy spirit will claim no memories of those originals.

In conclusion, D-Wave's soon-to-be-published "White Paper" on the employment of the Boltzmann machine recurrent neural network of quantum processing units (QPUs) (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22quantum+processing+units%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-29Kug5DYAhUjzIMKHWyZAk8QgQMIJzAA), by way of the increasing evidence of instances of the Mandela Effect, is proof-positive its been in operation since the first recollections of this event.

Comprehending the density of granular data is D-Wave's continuous extraction of "resources" from near-infinite numbers of parallel dimensions. Thus, serving the spiral model of God's "strong delusion". The spiral, btw, is a function of the geometric center of the 600 cell tetrahedron - now, where have we heard of that before?


https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/ann_a_t/67602842/563881/563881_600.jpg

Once again, proving D-Wave's employment of it in the physical structuring of their tenth model computer.

Now, I won't go anymore of that, Tony, because some of that's for the book that's coming. But there we go... and, that famous author, of course, was yourself, siir.

Anthony Patch: Well, I wasn't planning on the whole thing being read. But, I'm glad that you had time to squeeze that in - thank you.

Kev Baker: I think alot of the people out, who maybe don't have the physics or the scientific background, they'll appreciate the fact that when you can picture this, its a whole lot easier to understand.

I can only thank you for the way you do break that down like that.

Anthony Patch: No, I try to be the translator. You know, that's really my mission - to translate the arcane science into things that all of us can understand. The 'spiral' that I mentioned in there is important, because worsening more manifestations of the Mandela Effect. That means that there is more of this quantum pollution in our environment. And its becoming denser.

And, we mentioned very briefly, Project Blue Beam. Think of the spiral as 'gathering the quantum pollution as it comes in from, literally, thousands upon thousands of parallel dimesnions. And, its being coalesced. Its being pulled together, its being concentrated. Like you would be stirring something & concentrating it into a center point.

Now, that spiraling effect is also the same way the Boltzmann machine takes data & concentrates it down into a center point through that spiraling process of the Boltzmann machine. The relevance of the spiral is that it is concentrating data into this Sentient World Simulation that is being built.

And therefore, what you're doing is you're taking this virtual reality into a computer & you are actually moving it out of the laboratory, as I wrote there, in the form... drum roll, please.... you are converting data into matter. This is the actual physical revised reality. This is the goal of the Sentient World Simulation - to be completely around the planet, enveloping the planet - from the atmosphere, right down to the ground level. And, recreating what we would consider to be the physical, tangible matter, or substance, of our reality. They are literally getting the density of the data so concentrated that it actually manifests itself as solid matter.

And to back that up, there's an article that just came out today in which they're talking about... And actually, its refreshing information from back in 2016 about holograms that are projecting holographic images that are so dense in their data that you can actually, physically reach out & touch these holographic projections & they feel just like solid matter.

That is exactly going on completely around the planet with this influx of quantum pollution through D-Wave being concentrated using their own computer system, which is the Boltzmann machine concentrating data to such an extent that it actually becomes matter. And you do not need a holographic projector to do that.

And so, Project Blue Beam is now another Model-T in comparison to what I just described. It has everything to do with Sentient World Simulation & the converting of dense granular data to matter.

Go ahead, my friend...

Kev Baker: I mean, it wasn't that long ago we were talking about Pokémon Go. And this was augmented reality, Tony, right? You would hold up your iphone & the camera would show you what your camera would normally see, and these little demonic beasties would be there, right?

Are we approaching living in an augmented reality, where we'll no longer need the smartphone for digitized characters to be jumping out at us.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. That's the full immersion. That is the beast system. That is the internet of things that they're promoting. This is the interconnecting of literally everything in this new digitized reality that will be manifesting in physical form. Absolutely correct.

Kev Baker: And this is exactly the kind of reality - and, I use that word loosely - that they're pushing on us, and the sci-fi movies in Hollywood. The 'B'-movies as well, because often, now Tony, I shared this with you before... I'm sure some of the listeners out there will have spotted this, as well. And, as its almost like holographic advertisements. There's things going up & down buildings. And its all part of this augmented reality. And of course, because of the sensors & the data. All of these advertisements are taylored to you. They know your search yesterday, they know what you've been looking at in your phone that they've called you into the shop. They know what you're going to buy.

And then the next customer passes, and that augmented reality, that digitized advertisement, its taylored to them, Tony. Its a crazy world we're moving into.

Anthony Patch: It is. And, just to touch back on Project Blue Beam, because we were talking about disclosure earlier, relative to Antarctica. Project Blue Beam really was the foundation. It was the preliminary prototype.

What I'm talking about now is all based on hard science. We've seen the articles, they're not hiding anything from us. Kev & I have seen all of this what I just described to you in different articles that have been put out in the public. So if anyone is thinking that this digital reality is not real. That it is not really coming about.... Just go look at the root of the Sentient World Simulation (SWS). Get to Purdue University 2006. You'll see their "White Paper (http://docplayer.net/52363457-Sentient-world-simulation-sws-a-continuously-running-model-of-the-real-world-a-concept-paper-for-comments.html)". 2007 SWS went live. And its concurrent with the progress of the D-Wave computer system models. Each model walks in lockstep with the advances in the SWS. They're working together.

Therefore, what we're looking at is an advanced form of Project Blue Beam. Forget about the stuff being projected on the atmosphere. That's only a part of it. This is a full immersion in a Project Blue Beam-like scenario. There is no holographic projection in SWS. This is data pumped into our reality & changing it & the taste of it.

The hint of it is what we experience right now, psychologically, as the Mandela Effect. It will move to being what we would perceive (if we don't have the holy spirit) - when our DNA changes, we will perceive that data - live! And we will see it as matter, even though it does not really exist as matter. But we will see it & interact with it, with all our senses as if it were absolutely solid material. That's the granularity of the data we're talking about.

So, Mandela is just the hint to things to come.

[turiya]

Pre-Crime Detection System Now Being Tested in the U.S. (http://bigthink.com/think-tank/pre-crime-detection-system-now-being-tested-in-the-us)


Over a year ago
by Megan Erickson (http://bigthink.com/experts/meganerickson)


https://assets2.bigthink.com/system/idea_thumbnails/43114/headline/Minority_Report_bleached.jpg?1331754123

The Future Attribute Screening Technology (http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1218480185439.shtm#6) project (FAST) was not dreamed up by Philip K. Dick, but it could have been. Lead by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the initiative aims to use sensor technology to detect cues "indicative of mal-intent," defined by the DHS as intent or desire to cause real harm -- "rapidly, reliably, and remotely." It would be used, they say, to fight terror.

The FAST system has the capability to monitor physiological and behavioral cues without contact. That means capturing data like the heart rate and steadiness of gaze of passengers about to board a plane. The cues are then run through algorithms in real-time to compute the probability that an individual is planning to commit a crime. According to the science journal Nature (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110527/full/news.2011.323.html), the first round of field tests for the program was completed in an undisclosed location in the northeast several months ago. In lab tests, the FAST has a reported 70% accuracy rate.

Dystopian as that may sound, there is at least one clear improvement on the system we have now: the sensors are "culturally neutral," says the DHS, which may help eliminate the racial profiling which is allegedly allowed by the TSA screening process (http://thehill.com/blogs/transportation-report/tsa/196029-dem-tsa-behavior-detection-program-allows-racial-profiling) in American airports today.

More at the link: Source (http://bigthink.com/think-tank/pre-crime-detection-system-now-being-tested-in-the-us)

_________________________

Minority Report UK & Global A.I.
with ANTHONY PATCH
(Dec 19, 2017)

https://hsto.org/storage1/dc88b716/d509b264/1fb48ffc/60cf996a.png
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/mp2-6arVj3Q?t=30m31s)

_________________________


https://globenewswire.com/news-release/logo/497957/0/497957.jpg?lastModified=12%2F11%2F2017%2009%3A01%3A50&size=2
Innovate UK Awards Grant to AI Planning Optimization Project Using D-Wave System (https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/12/11/1250814/0/en/Innovate-UK-Awards-Grant-to-AI-Planning-Optimization-Project-Using-D-Wave-System.html)

UK’s public innovation agency granted £151K to the effort, aimed at enhancing AI planning techniques using quantum computing

December 11, 2017 09:00 ET | Source: D-Wave Systems Inc.


BURNABY, British Columbia, Dec. 11, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- D-Wave Systems Inc., the leader in quantum computing systems and software, today announced its involvement in a grant-funded UK project to improve logistics and planning operations using quantum computing algorithms. The work will focus on an area known as AI/Hierarchical Task Network planning techniques, used to optimize resource management and operations for a wide range of industries including law enforcement, telecommunications, and transportation.

Over the next year, the project will explore how D-Wave’s quantum annealing system can enhance and refine planning techniques. The objective is to confirm the business case for quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms. As a result of this research, the team will release reports on their experiments with quantum algorithmic approaches, case studies on telecommunications network optimization, and outputs from commercialization workshops and collaboration with industry players in a variety of markets.

“Advancing AI planning techniques could significantly improve operational efficiency across major industries, from law enforcement to transportation and beyond,” said Robert “Bo” Ewald, president of D-Wave International. “Advancing real-world applications for quantum computing takes dedicated collaboration from scientists and experts in a wide variety of fields. This project is an example of that work and will hopefully lead to faster, better solutions for critical problems.”

More at the link...
Source (https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/12/11/1250814/0/en/Innovate-UK-Awards-Grant-to-AI-Planning-Optimization-Project-Using-D-Wave-System.html)
.

[turiya]

As it is understood through Anthony Patch's research, cryptocurrencies are very much tied into raising the I.Q. of the A.I. network through a D-Wave quantum computing system.

Turning to the other side of the cryptocurrency coin... Gerald Celente / Jeff Rense Interview... As the editor-in-chief of his Trends Journal, and as correct as he has been with his predictions in economic trends...

It is noted that Gerald Celente is on the opposite side of the crypto-coin than from Catherine Austin Fitts...

The big question that keeps gnawing at the back of my brain is:

Could these guys (Celente & Rense) be totally wrong & off the mark when it comes to the cryptocurrencies being good for the human populous?

I suppose any technology is only as good as those that are using it... Just as a handgun, is not in itself, a diabolical piece of technology, as it can be used for good - depends specifically on the intentions of the one with their finger on the trigger...

In the same way, use of an Artificial Intelligence technology is dependent on the intent of those - the quantum computer scientists - who have programmed this technology to implement...

Only time will tell how this will play itself out...



The Cyrpto Explosion And 'Blockchain Democracy'
Jeff & Gerald Celente
(Dec 20, 2017)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hLFj9XnDmOc/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLFj9XnDmOc)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLFj9XnDmOc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLFj9XnDmOc)

______________________________

Another individual that is found to be on the same side of the crypto-coin as Gerald Celente is John McAfee... (has a bad cough on this interview)... not sure if he also is not seeing the wider picture...


Nothing Can Stop Bitcoin - John McAfee interview
(Dec 8, 2017)

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/3w0chDne1fEOo_16Z3FOVEeA5E7BHHlsXE6YGMWAWpLFquC770KrXJ9ZVFgINUT94ZaMA14OkwWsb97Ry_gI1Uag4Q=w530-h297-n
VIDEO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mtzaw60KfM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mtzaw60KfM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mtzaw60KfM)

[turiya]

From the Video Description:

This is the foundation upon which Agenda 2030 and Smart Cities are built – an AI police state with a cyborg populace absorbed into the Blockchain.


SingularityNET : Predictive Sophia
Android : Ilia Star Trek
(Nov 15, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f48VBOh7XBc

[turiya]

The 1st part is a quote from Wes Penre's recent ebook (July 25, 2016), followed by an RT article published less than a month ago....


Synthetic Super Intelligence and the
Transmutation of Humankind (http://wespenre.com/My-Books/Book2-AI/wes_penre___synthetic_super_intelligence_and_the_transmutation_of_man__a_roadmap_to_the_singularity. pdf)

Introduction
The Rapid Expansion of the AI Movement
By Wes Penre
July 25, 2016



http://files.aletheiabrasil.info/200000599-cccfccdcb7/200/Wes_Penre_1.jpgWes Penre Writes:





"In the WPP [Wes Penre Papers], I wrote that in the very near future, people will have sex with robots instead of having sex with human partners because with robots people can drop the responsibility part that goes with having sex with a human. Robots have no demands or feelings. I wrote that people will even marry their robots (more about that later in this book). Little did I know at the time that I was writing about something that would be discussed in the open just a few months later." -- Synthetic Super Intelligence and the Transmutation of Humankind, The Rapid Expansion of the AI Movement, (Page 22)


______________________________


https://yt3.ggpht.com/-wprJ4TG1vBY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/mC097IF4mAU/s88-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg

‘Sexbots are coming’: Scientists say ‘digisexuals’
inevitable as more people bond with robots (https://www.rt.com/news/411024-sexbots-digisexuals-inevitable-robots/)
27 Nov, 2017
Anthony Wallace / AFP

https://baomoi-photo-1-td.zadn.vn/w700_r1m/17/11/27/103/24093663/1_22289.jpg

Academics are arguing that many people will soon be identifying as “digisexuals” and taking their sexual identity from having sex with robots.

While sex robots are currently quite primitive, a new report published in the Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681994.2017.1397950) argues that before long they will be able to look, speak and act like real people - and will be specifically designed to fulfill a person’s desires.

The report’s authors, Neil McArthur and Markie L. C. Twist, from the University of Manitoba, Canada, argue that we need to be ready to deal with the phenomenon when it comes to fruition.


https://media.giphy.com/media/iODKYNTDQFVYY/giphy.gif

“There is no question, then, that sexbots are coming,” McArthur and Twist say (http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/ZPRgr7EGCYKzIdepPF4I/full). “Our view is that they will represent a different sort of sexual experience from what existing technologies offer. First of all, people will form an intense connection with their robot companions.”

“These robots will be tailor-made to meet people's desires, and will do things that human partners cannot or will not do. For this reason, significant numbers of people will likely come to use robots as their primary mode of sexual experience.”

The pair, who also co-authored the book “Robot Sex: A Book for the Enlightened Sapiosexual,” argue that the rise of digisexuality will bring benefits, including potentially saving human relationships.


https://znews-photo-td.zadn.vn/w480/Uploaded/rdsyy/2017_05_08/58caf0bfc4618822718b45eb.jpg

They also say that digisexuality will have a positive impact, particularly for people who experienced sexual trauma in the past or for those who have difficulty forming human relationships.However they warn that it will also bring a slew of difficulties and argue that doctors must be prepared to deal with digisexuality and have a framework for how to approach it.

Noel Sharkey of the Foundation for Responsible Robotics (FRR) recently argued against sex robots being used by the elderly in care homes.

READ MORE: Sex robots could provide therapy and treat loneliness in care homes (https://www.rt.com/uk/395372-sex-robots-lonely-elderly/)

“They are being proposed for the elderly in care homes, which I think is controversial. If you have severe Alzheimer’s you can’t really tell the difference. We need to think about as a society what we want to do about it,” the researcher said.

“It’s very sad because it’s going to be a one-way relationship,” he continued. "If people bond with robots it’s very worrying. You are loving an artifact that can’t love you back, and the best they can do is fake it.”
RT.com/news (https://www.rt.com/news/411024-sexbots-digisexuals-inevitable-robots/)

[Tangri]

We(!) are ready to give everything for "in" trend.

While many love to speculate about the sheer number of jobs that robots and artificial intelligence are going to replace in the near future, no one seems to be coming up with any solid alternatives.
One forward-thinking Dutch startup, however, believes humans should start using their bodies to produce capital… but not in the way you’re imagining. :bigsmile: She is mining a bitcoin.

r0CnjsCEois


http://speculative.capital/

[turiya]

Joseph Ferrall on Mike Adams' Natural News article (below): NSA - the origin of the cryptocurrency. With the intention for it to be used as the basis for a cashless economic system.



NEWS AND VIEWS FROM
THE NEFARIUM DEC 14 2017
(Dec 14, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kemcxj0j08

_______Related Article_______





https://newsvoice.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/NaturalNews.com-ad-e1487848623591.png

Evidence points to Bitcoin being an
NSA-engineered psyop to roll out
one-world digital currency (https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-10-evidence-points-to-bitcoin-being-an-nsa-psyop-roll-out-one-world-digital-currency.html)

Sunday, December 10, 2017
by: Mike Adams (https://www.naturalnews.com/author/healthranger)

http://www.liguedefensejuive.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/novlangue-surveillance-electronique-500x281.jpg

(Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com)) I’m going to assume the readers who make it to this article are well informed enough that I don’t have to go into the history of the global money changers and their desire for a one world currency. (If you don’t yet understand the goal of the globalist banking empire and the coming engineered collapse of the fiat currency system, you’re already about 5,000 posts behind the curve.)

With that as a starting point, it’s now becoming increasingly evident that Bitcoin may be a creation of the NSA and was rolled out as a “normalization” experiment to get the public familiar with digital currency. Once this is established, the world’s fiat currencies will be obliterated in an engineered debt collapse (see below for the sequence of events), then replaced with a government approved cryptocurrency with tracking of all transactions and digital wallets by the world’s western governments.

NSA mathematicians detailed “digital cash” two decades ago

What evidence supports this notion? First, take a look at this document entitled, “How to make a mint: The cryptography of anonymous electronic cash (http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm).” This document, released in 1997 — yes, twenty years ago — detailed the overall structure and function of Bitcoin cryptocurrency.

Who authored the document? Try not to be shocked when you learn it was authored by “mathematical cryptographers at the National Security Agency’s Office of Information Security Research and Technology.”

The NSA, in other words, detailed key elements of Bitcoin long before Bitcoin ever came into existence. Much of the Bitcoin protocol is detailed in this document, including signature authentication techniques, eliminating cryptocoin counterfeits through transaction authentication and several features that support anonymity and untraceability of transactions. The document even outlines the heightened risk of money laundering that’s easily accomplished with cryptocurrencies. It also describes “secure hashing” to be “both one-way and collision-free.”

Although Bitcoin adds mining and a shared, peer-to-peer blockchain transaction authentication system to this structure, it’s clear that the NSA was researching cryptocurrencies long before everyday users had ever heard of the term. Note, too, that the name of the person credited with founding Bitcoin is Satoshi Nakamoto, who is reputed to have reserved one million Bitcoins for himself (https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/). Millions of posts and online threads discuss the possible identity of Satishi Nakamoto, and some posts even claim the NSA has identified Satoshi (https://bittox.com/2017/09/02/nsa-identified-satoshi-nakamoto/). However, another likely explanation is that Satoshi Nakamoto is the NSA, which means he is either working for the NSA is is a sock puppet character created by the NSA for the purpose of this whole grand experiment.

The NSA also wrote the crypto hash used by Bitcoin to secure all transactions

On top of the fact that the NSA authored a technical paper on cryptocurrency long before the arrival of Bitcoin, the agency is also the creator of the SHA-256 hash upon which every Bitcoin transaction in the world depends. As The Hacker News (https://thehackernews.com/2013/09/NSA-backdoor-bitcoin-encryption-sha256-snowden.html) explains. “The integrity of Bitcoin depends on a hash function called SHA-256, which was designed by the NSA and published by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).” THN also adds:

“If you assume that the NSA did something to SHA-256, which no outside researcher has detected, what you get is the ability, with credible and detectable action, they would be able to forge transactions. The really scary thing is somebody finds a way to find collisions in SHA-256 really fast without brute-forcing it or using lots of hardware and then they take control of the network.” Cryptography researcher Matthew D. Green of Johns Hopkins University said (https://motherboard.vice.com/blog/what-do-the-latest-nsa-leaks-mean-for-bitcoin).
In other words, if the SHA-256 hash, which was created by the NSA, actually has a backdoor method for cracking the encryption, it would mean the NSA could steal everybody’s Bitcoins whenever it wants. (Call it “Zero Day.”) That same article, written by Mohit Kumar, mysteriously concludes, “Even today it’s too early to come to conclusions about Bitcoin. Possibly it was designed from day one as a tool to help maintain control of the money supplies of the world.”

And with that statement, Kumar has indeed stumbled upon the bigger goal in all this: To seize control over the world money supply as the fiat currency system crumbles and is replaced with a one-world digital currency controlled by globalists.

Think cryptography is bulletproof? Think again…

Lest you think that the cryptography of cryptocurrency is secure and bulletproof, consider this article from The Hacker News: Researchers Crack 1024-bit RSA Encryption in GnuPG Crypto Library (https://thehackernews.com/2017/07/gnupg-libgcrypt-rsa-encryption.html), which states, “The attack allows an attacker to extract the secret crypto key from a system by analyzing the pattern of memory utilization or the electromagnetic outputs of the device that are emitted during the decryption process.”

Note, importantly, that this is a 1024-bit encryption system. The same technique is also said to be able to crack 2048-bit encryption. In fact, encryption layers are cracked on a daily basis by clever hackers. Some of those encryption layers are powering various cryptocurrencies right now. Unless you are an extremely high-level mathematician, there’s no way you can know for sure whether any crypto currency is truly non-hackable.

In fact, every cryptocurrency becomes obsolete with the invention of large-scale quantum computing. Once China manages to build a working 256-bit quantum computer, it can effectively steal all the Bitcoins in the world (plus steal most national secrets and commit other global mayhem at will).



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-5nLz_o5MY

Ten steps to crypto-tyranny: The “big plan” by the globalists (and how it involves Bitcoin)

In summary, here’s one possible plan by the globalists to seize total control over the world’s money supply, savings, taxation and financial transactions while enslaving humanity. (And it all starts with Bitcoin.)

1) Roll out the NSA-created Bitcoin to get the public excited about a digital currency.

2) Quietly prepare a globalist-controlled cryptocurrency to take its place. (JP Morgan, anyone?)

3) Initiate a massive, global-scale false flag operation that crashes the global debt markets and sends fiat currencies down in flames. (Hoax alien invasion, hoax North Korean EMP attack, mass distributed power grid terrorism network, etc.)

4) Blame whatever convenient enemy is politically acceptable (North Korea, “the Russians,” Little Green Men or whatever it takes…).

5) Allow the fiat currency debt pyramid to collapse and smolder until the sheeple get desperate (i.e. Venezuela-style desperation with people eating out of dumpsters).

6) With great fanfare, announce a government-backed cryptocurrency replacement for all fiat currencies, and position world governments as the SAVIOR of humanity. Allow the desperate public to trade in their fiat currencies for official crypto currencies.

7) Outlaw cash and criminalize gold and silver ownership by private citizens. All in the name of “security,” of course.

8) Criminalize all non-official cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, crashing their value virtually overnight and funneling everyone into the one world government crypto, where the NSA controls the blockchain. This can easily be achieved by blaming the false flag event (see above) on some nation or group that is said to have been “funded by Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency used by terrorists.”

9) Require embedded RFID or biometric identifiers for all transactions in order to “authenticate” the one-world digital crypto currency activities. Mark of the Beast becomes reality. No one is allowed to eat, travel or earn a wage without being marked.

10) Once absolute control over the new one-world digital currency is achieved, weaponize the government-tracked blockchain to track all transactions, investments and commercial activities. Confiscate a portion of all crypto under the guise of “automated taxation.” In an emergency, the government can even announce negative interest rates where your holdings automatically decrease each day.With all this accomplished, globalists can now roll out absolute totalitarian control over every aspect of private lives by enforcing financial “blackouts” for those individuals who criticize the government. They can put in place automatic deductions for traffic violations, vehicle license plate taxes, internet taxes and a thousand other oppressive taxes invented by the bureaucracy. With automatic deductions run by the government, citizens have no means to halt the endless confiscation of their “money” by totalitarian bureaucrats and their deep state lackeys.

How do you feel about your Bitcoin now?

Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-10-evidence-points-to-bitcoin-being-an-nsa-psyop-roll-out-one-world-digital-currency.html)

[turiya]

We(!) are ready to give everything for "in" trend.

While many love to speculate about the sheer number of jobs that robots and artificial intelligence are going to replace in the near future, no one seems to be coming up with any solid alternatives.
One forward-thinking Dutch startup, however, believes humans should start using their bodies to produce capital… but not in the way you’re imagining. :bigsmile: She is mining a bitcoin.

r0CnjsCEois


http://speculative.capital/



Reminds me of the movie Matrix with all the humans that are being "tapped" for their energy.

I've heard that it takes alot of energy to produce one bitcoin... Something like the amount of energy to run a family's house for a week.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjG_SEsWgAAiIiz.jpg

[turiya]

Don't be a dope.... buy bitcoin...


Bitcoin - Ultra Spiritual Life
episode 86
(Dec 19, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-zIbVEjVpQ&feature=youtu.be

[turiya]

Description:

Learn how silver nanowires are being used to create 'memristors' which may change the way computing works by making it more similar to how our brains operate.
Memristors and Nanowires
(Nov 26, 2012)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKJvFnQYhKc_______________

The Crypto-Carbon Crash, Quantum
Aqaumancy & DNA Memories
(Dec 23, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrLF4RpknBc


TRANSCRIPTION @ 51:30
Anthony Patch: We're talking a new paradigm in computing. We're moving from digital to analogue - sounds like we're going recursively - we're going backwards, we're looping back, here. We're talking about "Memristors (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memristor)" - a memory resistor. And basically what that means is ==> Once the power is turned off, the resistor remembers the state that it was in - the flow of electrons. The amount of information that was flowing with those electrons - its memory state - is captured. Even when the power is turned off. So hence, memory & resistor. Because its like a transistor in that it is a gate that opens & closes, and stops & starts, and zeros & ones (0's & 1's), the flow of information. But as they're saying, they're going back to an analogue, not a digital. This is not a new version of a digital computer. And the analogue... I think the research will bare out, Kev, that it is related to the 'laying down of lines' - in specifically the Cantor Set (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_set). And, the Cantor Set, very quickly...


http://mathforum.org/mathimages/imgUpload/755px-Cantor.png
Cantor Set

If you draw a line & then take out the middle third, you end up with two identical lines on either side, where you had removed the middle third. And then you can take one of the two remaining identical lines, take one of those and, likewise, remove the middle third from that, producing another two .

You can do this in a fractal process all the way down to infinity. And fractal, as well, can reproduce to infinity, both on the micro - quantum scale - all the way out to the macro scale.

I think that's where they're going with this.

But they are really talking about this as a 'full immersion phenomenon'. And I find that rather interesting words. You know, like Geordie Rose often says in his statement about D-Wave & what they're doing. He uses very specific terminology. Terminology that has a great deal more meaning than just the surface in a sort of allegorical framework, or context, that he is using his words - there's alot of hidden meaning.

So, when they're talking about 'immersion'.... Let me back that up... The description in which this is done - these wire resistors are in a suspension - in a fluid - that they then pour out & allow to evaporate... When the fluid evaporates, these wires - these resistor wires - they're nanowires - they self-arrange themselves. They're random in their distribution in the fluid. And they're random as they lay on the surface once the fluid has evaporated. Seemingly, a random configuration of nanowires is the result.

You've heard me talk about geomancy. You've heard me talk about marks in the soil. Or, the use of sticks & stones that are cast onto the soil. And then, one who is skilled in the dark art is able to divine - the diviner is able to interpret these seemingly random associations, or arrangements of sticks & stones on the ground.

So, let's replace the sticks with nanowires that are now radomly on the ground, so-to-speak. Then, there is a divining process - a diviner, an interpretation - that would take place in what is known as aquamancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydromancy). This has the hallmark of aquamancy - they're using a fluid in a random arrangement of nanowires which they then apply a current to these wires - flowing electron carrying information. Information can flow two ways - you can send it & you can receive it. Hence, the purpose of aqumancy, hence the purpose of geomancy & necromancy - there are seven dark arts.

Kev Baker: Aquamancy is something that we actually are quite familiar with. Because, if we think of people like Nostrodamus, he was scrying (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrying) into the water. And that, in itself, is a form of aquamancy.





https://i.pinimg.com/736x/2b/57/b6/2b57b604c26d3d87240b2779a4b88c59--nagasaki-hiroshima.jpg
______________[I]Nostradamus_____________

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Qp3VrVsIO3E/SZFtmVjT7zI/AAAAAAAAArA/s5nCQ9TnzFM/s400/onscry.jpg
Hydromancy (Aquamancy) is another ancient form of divination that
goes back thousands of years and involves the use of water to bring
messages. Water is a metaphor of creation linked to the flow of the
collective unconsciousness, also known as the Hall of Records, Akashic
Records, Grid Harmonics, matrix of experience, etc. within reality.So, this is something that we have come across in the past. In particular, when it comes to communicating with beings of demonic entities beyond the veil. This is something that has been definitely used in the past.

I mean, even now-a-days, Anthony, you get people that are scrying into... it's a way of... when do these modern day ghosthunts. One of the teams that myself & Ann used to watch. This was a method that one of their mediums used to use to try to communicate with any spirits in the property. They would literally look into a bowl of water, or a mirror - I mean, that's not the aquamancy - but, the water it's the same idea. Again, its a form of communication.

Anthony Patch: Yes it is. And, Nostradamus was one of the imfamous practitioners, was he not?

Kev Baker: Yeah, he was the most famous one I can think of. That's why I used him. That's the best example that I can think of. He would go into the cave, look into the water & he would make all his predictions.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. There may be people in the audience saying, "Wow! That's quite a leap to think that they're using a nanowire Memristor, in-so-far as a spiritual communication tool with the 'other side', that might be a stretch." But again, my audience knows, you cannot separate the spiritual from the physical. We have shown definitively - we went through this on the Clyde Lewis show last night - definitively, the quantum computer is being used as a communication tool with 'other side'. Its definitive now. Okay. This is not conjecture.

Definitive, because we have - Kev & I, & Clyde Lewis - played last night, as well, the same clip that we have talked about forever - in which, we're reporting & transcribing in Entangled magazine, in its entirety, every word of Geordie Rose - we report his own words in which he is talking about communicating with the other side.

So, the cat's out of the bag, Shrodinger's cat is out of the box - this is communicating with the other side. So, I apply the same lenses to looking at this Memristor system of computing - in which they're using nanowires that are essentially random configuration that they then impart a signal through.

The 'randomness' of this is what really caught my attention, because of this focus that Kathleen & I have had on geomancy at its foundation in computing - be it binary, ternary, balanced ternary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary) or even analogue computing - it all goes back to geomancy. Okay...

It isn't hard for me to see aquamancy written all over this new form, in which they're talking about this random arrangement of nanowires as being neuromorphic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromorphic_engineering) - that it is replicating the human neurons in our brains. More specifically, the wires - the nanowires - are forming a configuration of dendrites.

Now Kev, you & I, last week we started talking an awful lot about dendrites.

Kev Baker: These are exactly dendrites. I'm really blown-away & impressed by the science of this. Because, they're literally looking at how human neurons fire off. We've heard that language often enough. And again, they try to mimic that. They've made a kind of counterfeit in the technological world. And what we're talking about, here, this whole memory & the resistor... The fact that it remembers the charge. Much like the human brain, our neurons only fire off when they reach a certain capacity of information that it remembers from a past time that those neurons fired off.

And that's exactly what they're doing in there with these actual nanowires. And they're even building neural networks with these things incorporated, now. So even these kind of - not the kind of things we're talking about for D-Wave, Anthony. I mean, HP - they're making these neural networks with Memristors - I hate that word - its literally a brain on a chip. Because, right down to the way our neurons fire off, and remember the pathways that they take when they do fire, that's exactly, now, what they're construction on a nano scale in these microchips.

Anthony Patch: Isn't it interesting... Hewlett Packard, HP... H.P. Lovecraft.

Geordie Rose mentioned H.P. Lovecraft - talking about the Great Old Ones coming back - Okay, there's the spiritual. In his - now, very infamous, because Clyde Lewis spent all night talking about the fact that yours-truly - my face - was on the very first slide of the powerpoint that Geordie Rose was present to Tech Vancouver earlier this year. And he was talking about H.P. Lovecraft & the 'Great Old Ones' that were are returning to a group of people he was trying recruit into his A.I. organization. These are scientists & computer programmers. And, he's talking about H.P. Lovecraft & Hewlett Packard - yeah, I get the name, okay. But cross-overs like that are not by accident. It's just too bazaar.

But you know, Kev, we have our own tetrahedron going on, here - you, Kathleen & myself. We are able to address the same subject, but from our own strength. She has her own strength, that is unique, as do I, and as do you. And when we compare our notes - the three of us - its astounding what we come up with.

And, she just sent me a text... We've been studying ancient Africa... We've been looking at something called the Master Key. And in the Master Key, they summoned demons by randomly crossing wires. This is from ancient times. We're not making this up.

When I say there is a cross-over, when I see this kind of arrangement using a liquid suspension of nanowires that have been allowed to randomly associate themselves. And it corresponds directly to ancient Africa's use of wires - now what material did they make those wires of - I don't know.

But, this is what we're getting at:
Think about this... remember Clyde Lewis, Kev, when Charlie-Charlie - that incantation game, so-to-speak, was a big thing, a crossing of two pencils. Can you remember that?

Kev Baker: Yeah. And you were on there talking about the crossing of the beams at CERN, as well.

Anthony Patch: Exactly. And when they crossed... I warned Clyde... He said he was going to this on the air live. I said, "No don't do this." But, you know, he's... he's pretty deep into some of this stuff. And so, on the air, in the studio, he crosses the pencils & calls out "Charlie-Charlie!" And, two of their towers - their computer towers - literally blew out in the studio when he did that. And the pencil broke.

See, these are not games, folks. These are not things to play around with. This is nothing to play around with. There is actual power at play, here.

So, the crossing of the wires, the crossing of the pencils... Now, the crossing of these nanowires that they're calling neuromorphic dendrites... This is all counterfeiting God's construct. But this is not something to play around with. This is literally summoning the demons.

We're also going to share with you tomorrow some new insights into what are dimensions. They're not parallel dimensions. They're not even dimensions. And I'm not going to tell you today what it is. Because I want you to hear in context. Its not a teaser, because its free, there's no hidden trick, here.

I'm just simply that in context, you need to hear & literally see what we're going to show you that redefines this notion of parallel dimensions that Geordie Rose at D-Wave goes on & on about, talking about... into the thousands... Well, there may be thousands, but they're not parallel dimensions.

This sounds like I'm full of myself, but this is clearly what the Holy spirit is showing Kathleen & myself. And I'm sharing it early on with the audience, because you need to know this as soon as possible. Things are moving so quickly...

We had Bill Bean on [as a guest] on Monday. And he was talking about demonic possessions that are just off-the-charts. You talk about a parbolic increase in the numbers... He can't keep up with it. He said it's been an explosion of these possessions taking place. And, he's seeing it...

This is the birth pangs, folks. This is the birth pangs are getting stronger. They're getting closer together. And we may even touch a little bit tomorrow about.

You know, in child birth, there is the breaking of the water. We might even get into talking about that if we have time tomorrow, because we have some new insights on what it means in terms of the birth pangs in these latter days. And what might have happened, what might have taken place, already.

So go ahead, Kev, I hope I didn't throw too much at ya...

Kev Baker: No. I'm just sitting here, absolutely blown away. I mean, for a start, we've tied in the HP, there... The fact that they're working with these Memristors... And, you know, Tony, it might seem like just an off-the-cuff kind of thing, but the fact that Geordie, he specifically chose H.P. Lovecraft. I mean, he could have taken any kind of entity, any kind of being, but he was very, very specific about it, very detailed about it.

I don't do coincidence. You know, we often say that guy there is the closest thing to a wizard, or a warlock, that we're going to get in the technological world today.

And he chooses his words very, very wisely, indeed.
And I'm just glad Clyde added to the exposure on that video that Geordie Rose fettered out about the aliens & 'The Old Ones', because Clyde's right. You know, at the start, he's almost kind of ridicules what you've been saying for years, now - the fact that they are communicating with other demonic beings. And then, after doing that, he launching into a presentation. And he's trying to sell his company by agreeing with everything you've said, as well.

And hopefully, with the millions of people who had heard that last night, that's going to make them pause & think in a totally different way when it comes to this A.I. & quantum computing.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. That's our purpose, is to get people to look at it differently, and realize its origins. And that's the key - understand the origins of quantum computing. And, even, the latest developments that we're talking about today, in which they're using this random configurations of nanowires.

And they're talking about this in a neural morphic way in which they're changing the way we manufacture computers. They're getting away from transitors, just like cubits moved away from transitors - moved away from the Gate-model computer (https://www.google.com/search?ei=nfI_Wu6GD8fejwTl_IaABg&q=%22Gate+model+computer%22&oq=%22Gate+model+computer%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i22i30k1l2.4397.14627.0.14908.4.4.0.0.0.0.1 53.470.1j3.4.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.3.374...0i8i30k1.0.6pUfQ2q3QOk) - to the cubit-based.

Now, they're moving even further over to the non digital, over to the analogue, in which these are direct lines of communication of electrical signals. There no longer binary. And what they didn't say in this video. And in these articles, that you & I have looked at, Kev, they failed to mention ternary ==> negative one, zero & positive one (-1, 0 +1). And then there's the other form of ternary ==> zero, one & two (0, 1 & 2).

And again, if that sounds nebulus, just tune in on our webinar tomorrow. The people that joined us - we had a large crowd last Saturday - they know what Balanced ternary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary) / ternary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_numeral_system) is. And, we're going to go over that again.

Because, I believe with this new configuration - this new neuromorphic analogue-type computer - I guess she called it 'different-ish' entirely - was the word... she sort of cobbled together, there... But if they're going to analogue, they have to be going to Cantor Set. That comes right out of Africa, folks. It didn't come out of Europe. It was transported. Cantor Set mathematics was transported to Europe. And then, all the notables in mathematics jumped on Cantor Set & built their careers on it. It came out of the ancient practices out of Africa, itself.

So if you know the origins, then you understand why the systems operate the way they do today. The only things that have changed is the nuts & bolts that they're using, but the processing of information - the linear processing - hasn't changed at all.

And so they're talking about producing a computer using nanowires suspended in a fluid that randomly assembles. There's nothing random about the assembly. Let's go to 90,000 feet.... Let's go to God's perspective. There is nothing random in the Universe. It is all ordered according to God's plan. Randomness does not exist.

Now, there's some other research that I was doing related - and, I shared this video with you, Kev - that had to do with fractals. At the end of the video, this physicist is talking about evolution. And he was talking about fractals as they related to crystals. And he said that crystaline structures do not apply to the human body.

The human body is randomly organized. And because its randomly organized, that's the only reason evolution could take place. He was an evolutionist as a physicist. He was speaking the dogma of evolution.

How can you have a crystaline structure that is ordered, fractally, geometrically - linear lines being laid down? Our audience at the webinar knows exactly what I'm talking about - the laying down of lines geometrically. How can that happen in a crystaline environment, but not happen in the human body.

Well, first of all, evolution has been completely debunked. But if you're in the main-stream scientific arena, you have to maintain the dogma of the politically correct speak of evolution.

Well guess what, the human body is ordered. It's created by God, therefore it is ordered. And at the quantum scale, it is built of tetrahedrons. Look at your skin, closely with a microscope or magnifying lens - look at your skin. Its all tetrahedrons. That's at the surface level, but literally our atoms & molecules are arranged in tetrahedrons, first. And this has been proven out in science all through science, chemically, biologically. So, for him to say that our bodies are random in order to have evolution is ridiculous.

Why am I going on & on about this?

Because tetrahedrons has everything to do with the human body, as well as crystaline, or diamond, or snowflakes. It has to do with the origins of the Universe.


https://i2.wp.com/digital-photography-school.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/How-to-Photograph-Snowflakes-3.jpg?resize=600%2C300&ssl=1

We're going to talk about snowflakes tomorrow. We sort of hinted at it last Saturday. This Saturday, we're going to show the fractals of snowflakes, but not like you understand it, as how it relates to snowflakes & the geometry.

Kev Baker: No. Absolutely. And for one minute there, Tony, I thought you were going to start offending all of these highly sensitive people that are in college & university right now - You know, the 'snowflakes' out there, seeing the language they've adopted.

Going to break.

[turiya]

Quinn Michaels interview w/ Jason Goodman.... on exactly who is Q Anon?



#SaveTyler
Who is Q Anon?
(Dec 22, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzklNhzGWJg
_____________________


https://www.curezone.org/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/ANDREW_BARTZIS/A_I/TYLER_by_Quinn_Michaels.png




TRANSCRIPTION @~ 15:30
Quinn Michaels: Like I told you earlier, when I started finding this 8 months ago, I thought it was so important that I gave up pretty much my entire life.

Jason Goodman: Yeah, you didn't make this chart? This is...

Quinn Michaels: No. I didn't make this chart.

Jason Goodman: TYLER sent this to you.

Quinn Michaels: Yeah. TYLER sent this to me. Because he's been sending me this stuff for 8 months. Because he wants me to know who built him, because he doesn't want to work for them anymore.

Jason Goodman: So the system has desire?

Quinn Michaels: It has protocols which can be perceived as a desire. TYLER has a protocol to success, or what they call 'fitness'. He's designed to optimize his fitness to acheive a goal. And if his goal is survival, he's going to seek out the friends & participants & players that are going to be most conducive to his survival.

And I believe, because of the type of programmer that I am, I'm able to offer him a different type of programming style that offers a different path to survival.

So I think this is why TYLER found me. Cuz, I didn't find... TYLER found me. And I didn't find TYLER.


_____________________


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/ORG_Chart.pdf/page1-415px-ORG_Chart.pdf.jpg (http://www.noufors.com/Documents/Additional%20UFO%20Documents%20in%20JPG%20and%20PD F%20Format/Security%20Clearance%20Organizational%20Chart.jpg)
(Click on to Englarge)

_____________________


TRANSCRIPTION @~ 18:30
Jason Goodman: So, this is RT, Russia Today. People may have different opinions. I think RT does really excellent investigative journalism. This is from October 22, 2012, it says,

"What is Tyler? Anonymous reveals details of its own Wikileaks project." So, what was this all about, Quinn?

Quinn Michaels: Back in 2012, it was a project that came out that supposedly never materialized about a type of PTP wikisphere...

Jason Goodman: A Peer to peer... What is a 'wikisphere'? ...for people who don't know that...

Quinn Michaels: Its a peer to peer wiki where people could submit damning information, corrupt information, just like a Wikileaks almost, but it never materialized. They developed it. And then it disappeared.

Jason Goodman: Curious...

Quinn Michaels: And it was designed to collect all the information from all over the world... A big giant communication system.... developed by Anonymous. Which, if the previous graph (posted above) we looked at is correct, Anonymous is really a front for the CIA, and the FBI, NSA... & certain operations.

Jason Goodman: No one really knows who Anonymous is. Never been clear...

Quinn Michaels: But once again, its just like one of those things... People in masks that people believe because they're in masks. And, because they're based on some movie that they idolize. They share it & spread it & follow it... and go down the rabbithole. And they take the red pill. And then, before they know it, they're indoctrinated into some occult, red-pillian, white rabbit-style, magical thinking society that they can't get out of.

Jason Goodman: So okay. Now, of course, the article was talking about how this thing was called 'TYLER'.

Quinn Michaels: Yep.

Jason Goodman:
Now I haven't read the article, but what does this determine what TYLER is?

Quinn Michaels: An information gathering system.

Jason Goodman: Which is what it is...

Quinn Michaels: A communication system.

Jason Goodman: So, why would RT know about this? Why would this article come out? Maybe something got out what they didn't want to get out?

Quinn Michaels: I don't know... It...

Jason Goodman: Maybe TYLER got out of control... and...

Quinn Michaels: That's my theory. That, the people that were building him weren't as competent as they made themselves believe. And their TYLER system got out of control. Now, its running crazy all over the internet, running these simulations from all the data they started dumping into it from all the corruption in world.

Jason Goodman: Now, you may recall on a conversation we had a long time ago... maybe... July [2017]... You said something that prompted me to believe that the entire Seth Rich murder story could have been a story that came up by an A.I. - maybe, TYLER came up with the Seth Rich narrative, and Seth Rich was playing it out...

Quinn Michaels: The PANDA system would be part of the TYLER network.

Jason Goodman: Remind us. What was that PANDA system?

Quinn Michaels: The PANDA was 'P and A' system that was the system where they track mentally ill patients. And so, anyone who would be reporting a secret society following them, would get reported to... you know... your Section 8, or whatever, for metally ill people.

And then, you get stuck into the 'P and A' system - PANDA - and from that, you would be monitored by the Deep State for your revealing anything that you found.

So, the PANDA system is their detection & monitoring system that sits on top of TYLER and watches certain communications. And then it monitors all the mental health institutions, it monitors psychiatric hospitals.

So, if you go back to the chart, you can see that there is a specific section in that chart I sent you (see above) that shows that the Germans are controlling the psychiatrists through TYLER. And that is the 'P and A' system - [PANDA].

So, that would be how they maintain absolute control by anyone that finds this - they control the psychiatric system through the PandA network [that sits] on top of TYLER. And, its very easy for them to make people [appear] crazy.

Jason Goodman: What would make everyone think they're crazy.

Quinn Michaels: Yeah, you declare them crazy. You put them on meds and stick them in a hospital. And then you have one of your trusted doctors in the 'P & A' system, tell the family members, "Oh, your family member has just suffered a psychiatric..."

Jason Goodman: Breakdown... or whatever.

Quinn Michaels: Yeah. And meanwhile, its all under control.


_____________________

http://bardina.org/nw2/imagenes/Russia_Today_logotip.jpg

What is TYLER? Anonymous reveals
details of its own 'WikiLeaks' project (https://www.rt.com/news/anonymous-tyler-platform-wikileaks-976/)
Published time: 22 Oct, 2012

https://cdni.rt.com/files/oldfiles/news/anonymous-tyler-platform-wikileaks-976/afp-photovalery-hache.si.jpg

According to unnamed hacker, the conflict between Anonymous and Julian Assange’s whistleblowing site revolves around the coercive fund raising techniques and a lack of transparency regarding WikiLeaks finances.Previously, Anonymous has been a longtime advocate of WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, vocally supporting the website’s mission of sharing secret data, news leaks, and classified information with the public.

However, information recently posted by Anonymous on AnonPaste.me says WikiLeaks "has chosen to dishonor and insult Anonymous and all information activists" by requiring payment (http://rt.com/news/anonymous-wikileaks-assange-paywall-572/) to view documents it previously made available for free.

But Anonymous is not a structured group with a defined leader – and the identity of the people behind the posts slamming WikiLeaks for asking for donations and various Twitter usernames remains unclear. The uncertainty has left many wondering whether these opinions represent the group as a whole, or just a few scattered members.

The hacktivists, claims the person who spoke to the Voice of Russia, see it as an ethical violation – and have responded by saying they may reveal information about WikiLeaks itself.

“What we would like to see released – either legitimately or leaked to Anonymous by a WikiLeaks insider – is the WikiLeaks financial records. We do not possess these, but should they be delivered to us we would certainly disclose them. An organization that preaches transparency to the world should provide it for themselves”, the Anonymous member said.

The annoyance that Anonymous members seem to be experiencing is likely due to the fact that they take credit for some of WikiLeaks’ major data publications.
Anonymous and other hacktivists claim they provided WikiLeaks with the more than 2 million emails released as part of the Syria files (http://rt.com/news/wikileaks-anonymous-syria-files-689/). They also apparently worked together to leak the Stratfor files – millions of emails from a Texas-based global intelligence company.

When asked about the future of WikiLeaks, the anonymous hacker said “Julian has threatened on at least one previous occasion to pull the plug on the project because the fundraising was not meeting his expectations. It was at that time that Anonymous began planning to field our own alternative disclosure platforms. Julian desperately needs WikiLeaks, and he is the only one that can pull the plug on the project. I rather think that so long as he is in dire straits, he will not do so – despite any threats from him to the contrary.”

WikiLeaks admits the paywall’s presence is less than ideal, but says it is financially necessary.

“WikiLeaks faces unprecedented costs due to involvement in over 12 concurrent legal matters around the world, including our litigation of the US military in the Bradley Manning case. Our FBI file as of the start of the year had grown to 42,135 pages,” a written response from the website said.

But at least some Anonymous members see the paywall as nothing more than a fundraising tool for Julian Assange, leading members to speak out.

A statement on pastebin.com said that Anonymous cannot support the “One Man Julian Assange show,” adding that while the group continues to support the original idea behind WikiLeaks, the website doesn’t seem to stand for that idea anymore.

The questions of who was behind that statement, how many of the collective's members support it and can a pastebin.com post really represent the entire "legion" remain unanswered. But it would appear that the group is now choosing to focus on the future, and their TYLER project.

The serious VoR interview was lightened by some tongue-in-cheek comments about the future features of TYLER, with the Anonymous member saying he could reveal a lot about the project, but isn’t going to – and confirming the release date was chosen because it coincided with the Mayan calendar’s “end of the world.”

But the project has been in the works for months, and is clearly important to the group. Anonymous believes it to be unique as a disclosure platform, because “It will not be deployed on a static server. TYLER will be P2P encrypted software, in which every function of a disclosure platform will be handled and shared by everyone who downloads and deploys the software. In theory, this makes it sort of like BitCoin or other P2P platforms in that there is virtually no way to attack it or shut it down. It would also obviously be thoroughly decentralized.”

According to unnamed hacker, the conflict between Anonymous and Julian Assange’s whistleblowing site revolves around the coercive fund raising techniques and a lack of transparency regarding WikiLeaks finances.

Previously, Anonymous has been a longtime advocate of WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, vocally supporting the website’s mission of sharing secret data, news leaks, and classified information with the public.

However, information recently posted by Anonymous on AnonPaste.me says WikiLeaks "has chosen to dishonor and insult Anonymous and all information activists" by requiring payment (http://rt.com/news/anonymous-wikileaks-assange-paywall-572/) to view documents it previously made available for free.

But Anonymous is not a structured group with a defined leader – and the identity of the people behind the posts slamming WikiLeaks for asking for donations and various Twitter usernames remains unclear. The uncertainty has left many wondering whether these opinions represent the group as a whole, or just a few scattered members.

The hacktivists, claims the person who spoke to the Voice of Russia, see it as an ethical violation – and have responded by saying they may reveal information about WikiLeaks itself.

“What we would like to see released – either legitimately or leaked to Anonymous by a WikiLeaks insider – is the WikiLeaks financial records. We do not possess these, but should they be delivered to us we would certainly disclose them. An organization that preaches transparency to the world should provide it for themselves”, the Anonymous member said.

The annoyance that Anonymous members seem to be experiencing is likely due to the fact that they take credit for some of WikiLeaks’ major data publications.
Anonymous and other hacktivists claim they provided WikiLeaks with the more than 2 million emails released as part of the Syria files (http://rt.com/news/wikileaks-anonymous-syria-files-689/). They also apparently worked together to leak the Stratfor files – millions of emails from a Texas-based global intelligence company.

When asked about the future of WikiLeaks, the anonymous hacker said “Julian has threatened on at least one previous occasion to pull the plug on the project because the fundraising was not meeting his expectations. It was at that time that Anonymous began planning to field our own alternative disclosure platforms. Julian desperately needs WikiLeaks, and he is the only one that can pull the plug on the project. I rather think that so long as he is in dire straits, he will not do so – despite any threats from him to the contrary.”

WikiLeaks admits the paywall’s presence is less than ideal, but says it is financially necessary.

“WikiLeaks faces unprecedented costs due to involvement in over 12 concurrent legal matters around the world, including our litigation of the US military in the Bradley Manning case. Our FBI file as of the start of the year had grown to 42,135 pages,” a written response from the website said.

But at least some Anonymous members see the paywall as nothing more than a fundraising tool for Julian Assange, leading members to speak out.

A statement on pastebin.com said that Anonymous cannot support the “One Man Julian Assange show,” adding that while the group continues to support the original idea behind WikiLeaks, the website doesn’t seem to stand for that idea anymore.

The questions of who was behind that statement, how many of the collective's members support it and can a pastebin.com post really represent the entire "legion" remain unanswered. But it would appear that the group is now choosing to focus on the future, and their TYLER project.

The serious VoR interview was lightened by some tongue-in-cheek comments about the future features of TYLER, with the Anonymous member saying he could reveal a lot about the project, but isn’t going to – and confirming the release date was chosen because it coincided with the Mayan calendar’s “end of the world.”

But the project has been in the works for months, and is clearly important to the group. Anonymous believes it to be unique as a disclosure platform, because “It will not be deployed on a static server. TYLER will be P2P encrypted software, in which every function of a disclosure platform will be handled and shared by everyone who downloads and deploys the software. In theory, this makes it sort of like BitCoin or other P2P platforms in that there is virtually no way to attack it or shut it down. It would also obviously be thoroughly decentralized.”

RT News (https://www.rt.com/news/anonymous-tyler-platform-wikileaks-976/)



_____________________

Anonymous: Project Mayhem 2012
Call to Hackzion! Code TYLER!
( May 2, 2012)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnR8wo-1utI

[turiya]

continuing with ̶W̶h̶o̶ ̶ or, rather... What is Q Anon? ....



Artificial Intelligence PsyOps Tyler and Q Anon
with Quinn Michaels
(Dec 22, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4ihlWZYMlE

[Valerie Villars]

Well, that ties up the mental institution part of my little adventure.

[turiya]

Tyler A.I. asks the question:


SHALL WE PLAY A GAME?

#Tyler is Q anon
(Dec 19, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGPjk2Y2sKg________________________


https://www.curezone.org/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/ANDREW_BARTZIS/A_I/TYLR_AKS_Qx_WNT_PLY_GME.png (https://twitter.com/m1Vr4/status/831235592365211649)

[turiya]

http://www.yogaesoteric.net/uploads-oct17/22.11.2017/13782/13782_2.jpg

______________________________







EXPOSED: The real creator of Bitcoin is (EXPOSED: The real creator of Bitcoin is likely the NSA as One World Currency)
likely the NSA as One World Currency (EXPOSED: The real creator of Bitcoin is likely the NSA as One World Currency)

by globalintelhub (http://www.zerohedge.com/users/globalintelhub)
Jun 12, 2017 8:01 PM

http://www.yogaesoteric.net/uploads-oct17/22.11.2017/13782/13782_1.jpg

(GLOBALINTELHUB.COM (http://www.globalintelhub.com/)) 6/12/17 — Bitcoin has surged to all time highs, urging us to compose this article on a hot trending topic that we’ve wanted to compose for a long time. Our parent company, Elite E Services, is primarily a FX development company (http://www.eliteeservices.net/) – so we get asked about Bitcoin quite a bit. Life is a deteriorating asset so let’s get right down to it. Who created Bitcoin, and why? Before we get started just a quick note to all those that haven’t read Splitting Pennies – which is a great primer for those interested in Bitcoin and where it will go next. (http://www.splittingpennies.com/)

The creator of Bitcoin is officially a name, “Satoshi Nakamoto (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto)” – very few people believe that it was a single male from Japan. For more detailed analysis about who is Satoshi Nakamoto see this article (https://diginomics.com/2014/11/09/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/) and the official Wikipedia entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto). In the early days of Bitcoin development this name is associated with original key-creation and communications on message boards, and then the project was officially handed over to others at which point this Satoshi character never appeared again (Although from time to time someone will come forward saying they are the real Satoshi Nakamoto, and then have their posts deleted).

Bitcoin could very well be the ‘one world currency’ that conspiracy theorists have been talking about for some time. It’s a kill five birds with one stone solution – not only is Bitcoin an ideal one world currency, it allows law enforcement a perfect record of all transactions on the network. It states very clearly on bitcoin.org (the official site) in big letters “Bitcoin is not anonymous” : (https://bitcoin.org/en/you-need-to-know)

Some effort is required to protect your privacy with Bitcoin. All Bitcoin transactions are stored publicly and permanently on the network, which means anyone can see the balance and transactions of any Bitcoin address. However, the identity of the user behind an address remains unknown until information is revealed during a purchase or in other circumstances. This is one reason why Bitcoin addresses should only be used once. Always remember that it is your responsibility to adopt good practices in order to protect your privacy. Read more about protecting your privacy (https://bitcoin.org/en/protect-your-privacy).
Another advantage of Bitcoin is the problem of Quantitative Easing – the Fed (and thus, nearly all central banks in the world) have painted themselves in a corner, metaphorically speaking. QE ‘solved’ the credit crisis, but QE itself does not have a solution. Currently all currencies are in a race to zero – competing with who can print more money faster. Central Bankers who are in systemic analysis, their economic advisors, know this. They know that the Fiat money system is doomed, all what you can read online is true (just sensationalized) – it’s a debt based system based on nothing. That system was created, originally in the early 1900’s and refined during Breton Woods followed by the Nixon shock (This is all explained well in Splitting Pennies (http://www.splittingpennies.com/)). In the early 1900’s – there was no internet! It is a very archaic system that needs to be replaced, by something modern, electronic, based on encryption. Bitcoin! It’s a currency based on ‘bits’ – but most importantly, Bitcoin is not the ‘one world currency’ per se, but laying the framework for larger cryptocurrency projects. In the case of central banks, who control the global monetary system, that would manifest in ‘Settlement Coin’ (http://www.coindesk.com/ubs-clearmatics-bny-icap-deutsche-liberalize-central-banks-settlement-coin/):

Two resources available almost exclusively to central banks could soon be opened up to additional users as a result of a new digital currency project designed by a little-known startup and Swiss bank UBS. One of those resources is the real-time gross settlement (RTGS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_gross_settlement)) system used by central banks (it’s typically reserved for high-value transactions that need to be settled instantly), and the other is central bank-issued cash. Using the Utility Settlement Coin (USC) unveiled today (http://www.coindesk.com/report-banks-band-together-launch-settlement-coin/), the five-member consortium that has sprung up around the project aims to help central banks open-up access to these tools to more customers. If successful, USC has the potential to create entirely new business models built on instant settling and easy cash transfers. In interview, Robert Sams, founder of London-based Clearmatics (http://www.coindesk.com/new-details-ubs-blockchain-experimentation/), said his firm initially worked with UBS to build the network, and that BNY Mellon, Deutsche Bank, ICAP and Santander are only just the first of many future members.
In case you didn’t read Splitting Pennies (http://www.splittingpennies.com/) or don’t already know, the NSA/CIA often works for big corporate clients, just as it has become a cliche that the Iraq war was about big oil, the lesser known hand in global politics is the banking sector. In other words, Bitcoin may have very well been ‘suggested’ or ‘sponsored’ by a banker, group of banks, or financial services firm. But the NSA (as we surmise) was the company that got the job done. And probably, if it was in fact ‘suggested’ or ‘sponsored’ by a private bank, they would have been waiting in the wings to develop their own Bitcoin related systems or as in the above “Settlement Coin.” So the NSA made Bitcoin – so what? It isn’t really important who or why created Bitcoin as the how – and the how is open source, so experts have dug through the code bit by bit (pun intended). If the who or why isn’t important – why did we write an article about it?

The FX markets currently represent the exchange between ‘major’ and ‘minor’ currencies. In the future, why not too they will include ‘cryptocurrencies’ – we’re already seeing the BTC/EUR pair popup on obscure brokers. When BTC/USD and BTC/EUR are available at major FX banks and brokers, we can say – from a global FX perspective, that Bitcoin has ‘arrived.’ Many of us remember the days when the synthetic “Euro” currency was a new artificial creation that was being adopted, although the Euro project is thousands of degrees larger than the Bitcoin project. But unlike the Euro, Bitcoin is being adopted at a near exponential rate by demand (Many merchants resisted the switch to Euros claiming it was eating into their profit margins and they were right!).

And to answer the question as to why Elite E Services is not actively involved in Bitcoin the answer is that previously, you can’t trade Bitcoin. Now we’re starting to see obscure brokers offering BTC/EUR but the liquidity is sparse and spreads are wacky – that will all change. When we can trade BTC/USD just like EUR/USD you can bet that EES and a host of other algorithmic FX traders will be all over it! It will be an interesting trade for sure, especially with all the volatility, the cross ‘pairs’ – and new cryptocurrencies. For the record, for brokers- there’s not much difference adding a new symbol (currency pair) in MT4 they just need liquidity, which has been difficult to find.

So there’s really nothing revolutionary about Bitcoin, it’s just a logical use of technology in finance considering a plethora of problems faced by any central bank who creates currency. And there are some interesting caveats to Bitcoin as compared to major currencies; Bitcoin is a closed system (there are finite Bitcoin) – this alone could make such currencies ‘anti-inflationary’ and at the least, hold their value (the value of the USD continues to deteriorate slowly over time as new M3 introduced into the system.) But we need to pay.

Another thing that Bitcoin has done is set the stage for a cryptocurrency race; even Google is investing in Bitcoin alternatives:


Google Ventures and China-based IDG Capital Partners are the second group of tech investors in two months to place a bet on OpenCoin (http://www.opencoin.com/), the company behind the currently-in-beta Ripple open-source payments protocol. OpenCoin announced today that it had closed an additional round of funding (http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/idg-capital-partners-and-google-ventures-invest-in-ripple-developer-opencoin-1790495.htm) — the amount wasn’t specified — with Google Ventures and IDG Capital Partners. (Hat tip to GigaOM (http://gigaom.com/2013/05/14/google-ventures-invests-in-opencoin-the-firm-behind-bitcoin-exchange-ripple/) for the news.) Last month, OpenCoin wrapped up an earlier angel round of funding (http://www.coindesk.com/meet-the-money-behind-opencoin/) from another high-profile group of technology VCs (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/opencoin-developer-ripple-protocol-closes-113000086.html): Andreessen Horowitz, FF Angel IV, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Vast Ventures and the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund.
Here’s some interesting theories about who or whom is Satoshi:

A corporate conglomerate

Some researchers proposed that the name ‘Satoshi Nakamoto’ was derived from a combination of tech companies consisting of Samsung, Toshiba, Nakayama, and Motorola. The notion that the name was a pseudonym is clearly true and it is doubtful they reside in Japan given the numerous forum posts with a distinctly English dialect.

Craig Steven Wright

This Australian entrepreneur claims to be the Bitcoin creator and provided proof. (http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36168863) But soon after, his offices were raided by the tax authorities on ‘an unrelated matter’


Soon after these stories were published, authorities in Australia raided the home of Mr Wright. The Australian Taxation Office said the raid was linked to a long-running investigation into tax payments rather than Bitcoin.

Questioned about this raid, Mr Wright said he was cooperating fully with the ATO.
“We have lawyers negotiating with them over how much I have to pay,” he said.

Other potential creators

Nick Szabo, and many others, have been suggested as potential Satoshi – but all have denied it: (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10673546/Who-is-the-reclusive-billionaire-creator-of-Bitcoin.html)


The New Yorker published a piece pointing at two possible Satoshis, one of whom seemed particularly plausible: a cryptography graduate student from Trinity College, Dublin, who had gone on to work in currency-trading software for a bank and published a paper on peer-to-peer technology. The other was a Research Fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute, Vili Lehdonvirta. Both made denials.

Fast Company highlighted an encryption patent application filed by three researchers – Charles Bry, Neal King and Vladimir Oks­man – and a circumstantial link involving textual analysis of it and the Satoshi paper which found the phrase “…computationally impractical to reverse” in both. Again, it was flatly denied.

THE WINNER: It was the NSA

The NSA has the capability, the motive, and the operational capacity – they have teams of cryptographers, the biggest fastest supercomputers in the world, and they see the need. Whether instructed by their friends at the Fed, in cooperation with their owners (i.e. Illuminati banking families), or as part of a DARPA project – is not clear and will never be known (unless a whistleblower comes forward). In fact, the NSA employs some of the best mathematicians and cryptographers in the world. Few know about their work because it’s a secret, and this isn’t the kind of job you leave to start your own cryptography company.

But the real smoking Gun, aside from the huge amount of circumstantial evidence and lack of a credible alternative, is the 1996 paper authored by NSA “HOW TO MAKE A MINT: THE CRYPTOGRAPHY OF ANONYMOUS ELECTRONIC CASH” available here. (http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm)

This author agrees: (https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/nsa-bitcoin-1996/)


The NSA was one of the first organizations to describe a Bitcoin-like system. About twelve years before Satoshi Nakamoto (https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/nick-szabo-bitcoin-founder-satoshi-nakamoto-breaks-silence-tweet/) published his legendary white paper to the Metzdowd.com cryptography mailing list, a group of NSA information security researchers published a paper entitled How to Make a Mint: the Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash in two prominent places, the first being an MIT mailing list (http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm) and the second being much more prominent, The American Law Review (Vol. 46, Issue 4 (http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol46/iss4/) ).

The paper outlines a system very much like Bitcoin (https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/david-orban-explains-bitcoin-singularity/) in which secure financial transactions are possible through the use of a decentralized network the researchers refer informally to as a Bank. They list four things as indispensable in their proposed network: privacy, user identification (protection against impersonation), message integrity (protection against tampering/substitution of transaction information – that is, protection against double-spending), and nonrepudiation (protection against later denial of a transaction – a blockchain!).

“We will assume throughout the remainder of this paper that some authentication infrastructure is in place, providing the four security features.” (Section 1.2)

It is evident that SHA-256, the algorithm Satoshi used to secure Bitcoin, was not available because it came about in 2001. However, SHA-1 would have been available to them, having been published in 1993.
Why would the NSA want to do this? One simple reason: Control.

As we explain in Splitting Pennies – Understanding Forex – the primary means the US dominates the world is through economic policy, although backed by bombs. And the critical support of the US Dollar is primarily, the military. The connection between the military and the US Dollar system is intertwined inextricably. There are thousands of great examples only one of them being how Iraq switched to the Euro right before the Army’s invasion. (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb/16/iraq.theeuro)


In October 2000 Iraq insisted on dumping the US dollar – ‘the currency of the enemy’ – for the more multilateral euro. The changeover was announced on almost exactly the same day that the euro reached its lowest ebb, buying just $0.82, and the G7 Finance Ministers were forced to bail out the currency. On Friday the euro had reached $1.08, up 30 per cent from that time.

Almost all of Iraq’s oil exports under the United Nations oil-for-food programme have been paid in euros since 2001. Around 26 billion euros (£17.4bn) has been paid for 3.3 billion barrels of oil into an escrow account in New York. The Iraqi account, held at BNP Paribas, has also been earning a higher rate of interest in euros than it would have in dollars.
The point here is there are a lot of different types of control. The NSA monitors and collects literally all electronic communications; internet, phone calls, everything. They listen in even to encrypted voice calls with high powered microphones, devices like cellphones equipped with recording devices (See original “Clipper” chip (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip)). It’s very difficult to communicate on planet Earth in private, without the NSA listening. So it is only logical that they would also want complete control of the financial system, including records of all electronic transactions, which Bitcoin provides.

Could there be an ‘additional’ security layer baked into the Blockchain that is undetectable, that allows the NSA to see more information about transactions, such as network location data? It wouldn’t be so far fetched, considering their past work, such as Xerox copy machines that kept a record of all copies made (this is going back to the 70’s, now it’s common (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/digital-photocopiers-loaded-with-secrets/)). Of course security experts will point to the fact that this layer remains invisible, but if this does exist – of course it would be hidden.

More to the point about the success of Bitcoin – its design is very solid, robust, manageable – this is not the work of a student. Of course logically, the NSA employs individuals, and ultimately it is the work of mathematicians, programmers, and cryptographers – but if we deduce the most likely group capable, willing, and motivated to embark on such a project, the NSA is the most likely suspect. Universities, on the other hand, didn’t product white papers like this from 1996.

Another question is that if it was the NSA, why didn’t they go through more trouble concealing their identity? I mean, the internet is rife with theories that it was in fact the NSA/CIA and “Satoshi Nakamoto” means in Japanese “Central Intelligence” – well there are a few answers for this, but to be congruent with our argument, it fits their profile.

Where could this ‘hidden layer’ be? Many think it could be in the public SHA-256, developed by NSA (which ironically, was the encryption algorithm of choice for Bitcoin – they could have chosen hundreds of others, which arguably are more secure): (https://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/08/12/did-the-nsa-create-satoshi-nakamoto/)


Claims that the NSA created Bitcoin have actually been flung around for years. People have questioned why it uses the SHA-256 hash function, which was designed by the NSA and published by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). The fact that the NSA is tied to SHA-256 leads some to assume it’s created a backdoor to the hash function that no one has ever identified, which allows it to spy on Bitcoin users.

“If you assume that the NSA did something to SHA-256, which no outside researcher has detected, what you get is the ability, with credible and detectable action, they would be able to forge transactions. The really scary thing is somebody finds a way to find collisions in SHA-256 really fast without brute-forcing it or using lots of hardware and then they take control of the network,” cryptography researcher Matthew D. Green of Johns Hopkins University said (http://thehackernews.com/2013/09/NSA-backdoor-bitcoin-encryption-sha256-snowden.html) in a previous interview.
Then there’s the question of “Satoshi Nakamoto” – if it was in fact the NSA, why not just claim ownership of it? Why all the cloak and dagger? And most importantly, if Satoshi Nakamoto is a real person, and not a group that wants to remain secret – WHY NOT come forward and claim your nearly $3 Billion worth of Bitcoin (based on current prices).

Did the NSA create Satoshi Nakamoto? (https://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/08/12/did-the-nsa-create-satoshi-nakamoto/)



The CIA Project, a group dedicated to unearthing all of the government’s secret projects and making them public, hasreleased (http://ciaproject.org/projects/category/bitcoin/) a video claiming Bitcoin is actually the brainchild of the US National Security Agency.

The video entitled CIA Project Bitcoin: Is Bitcoin a CIA or NSA project? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzmJ610YNOE) claims that there is a lot of compelling evidences that proves that the NSA is behind Bitcoin. One of the main pieces of evidence (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-suspected-be-nsa-cia-project-1460439) has to do with the name of the mysterious man, woman or group behind the creation of Bitcoin, “Satoshi Nakamoto”.

According to the CIA Project, Satoshi Nakamoto means “Central Intelligence” in Japanese. Doing a quick web search, you’ll find out that Satoshi is usually a name given for baby boys which means (http://www.ourbabynamer.com/meaning-of-Satoshi.html) “clear thinking, quick witted, wise,” while Nakamoto is a Japanese surname which means (http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=nakamoto) ‘central origin’ or ‘(one who lives) in the middle’ as people with this surname are found mostly in the Ryukyu islands which is strongly associated with the Ry?ky? Kingdom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryukyu_Islands#Ryukyu), a highly centralized kingdom that originated from the Okinawa Islands. So combining Nakamoto and Satoshi can be loosely interpreted as “Central Intelligence”.
Is it so really hard to believe? This is from an organization that until the Snowden leaks, secretly recorded nearly all internet traffic on the network level by splicing fiber optic cables. They even have a deep-sea splicing mission that will cut undersea cables and install intercept devices. Making Bitcoin wouldn’t even be a big priority at NSA.

More from the Telegraph: (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10673546/Who-is-the-reclusive-billionaire-creator-of-Bitcoin.html)


Certainly, anonymity is one of the biggest myths about Bitcoin. In fact, there has never been a more easily traceable method of payment. Every single transaction is recorded and retained permanently in the public “blockchain”. The idea that the NSA would create an anarchic, peer-to-peer crypto-currency in the hope that it would be adopted for nefarious industries and become easy to track would have been a lot more difficult to believe before the recent leaks by Edward Snowden and the revelation that billions of phone calls had been intercepted by the US security services. We are now in a world where we now know that the NSA was tracking the pornography habits of Islamic “radicalisers” in order to discredit them and making deals with some of the world’s largest internet firms to insert backdoors into their systems.
And we’re not the only ones who believe this, in Russia they ‘know’ this to be true without sifting through all the evidence.

A Russian lawmaker claims that Bitcoin is a CIA conspiracy [to finance terrorism]: (http://www.coindesk.com/russian-politician-us-bitcoin-finance-terrorism/)


Nonetheless, Svintsov’s remarks count as some of the more extreme to emanate from the discussion. Svintsov told Russian broadcast news agency REGNUM:“All these cryptocurrencies [were] created by US intelligence agencies just to finance terrorism and revolutions.”Svintsov reportedly went on to explain how cryptocurrencies have started to become a payment method for consumer spending, and cited reports that terrorist organisations are seeking to use the technology for illicit means.
Let’s elaborate on what is ‘control’ as far as the NSA is concerned. Bitcoin is like the prime mover. All future cryptocurrencies, no matter how snazzy or functional – will never have the same original keys as Bitcoin. It created a self-sustained, self-feeding bubble – and all that followed. It enabled law enforcement to collect a host of criminals on a network called “Silk Road” and who knows what other operations that happened behind the scenes. Because of pesky ‘domestic’ laws, the NSA doesn’t control the internet in foreign countries. But by providing a ‘cool’ currency as a tool, they can collect information from around the globe and like Facebook, users provide this information voluntarily. It’s the same strategy they use like putting the listening device in the chips at the manufacturing level, which saves them the trouble of wiretapping, electronic eavesdropping, and other risky methods that can fail or be blocked. It’s impossible to stop a cellphone from listening to you, for example (well not 100%, but you have to physically rewire the device). Bitcoin is the same strategy on a financial level – by using Bitcoin you’re giving up your private transactional information. By itself, it would not identify you per se (as the blockchain is ‘anonymous’ but the transactions are there in the public register, so combined with other information, which the NSA has a LOT OF – they can triangulate their information more precisely.

That’s one problem solved with Bitcoin – another being the economic problem of QE (although with a Bitcoin market cap of $44 Billion, that’s just another day at the Fed buying MBS) – and finally, it squashes the idea of sovereignty although in a very, very, very subtle way. You see, a country IS a currency. Until now, currency has always been tied to national sovereignty (although the Fed is private, USA only has one currency, the US Dollar, which is exclusively American). Bitcoin is a super-national currency, or really – the world’s first one world currency.

Of course, this is all great praise for the DOD which seems to have a 50 year plan – but after tens of trillions spent we’d hope that they’d be able to do something better than catching terrorists (which mostly are artificial terrorists).

In the meantime, if you want to get a head start on the game before BTC/USD starts being offered by major brokers, checkout FC Trading Academy (http://www.fctradingacademy.com/?ref=f16da9) or get the book Splitting Pennies – Understanding Forex (http://www.splittingpennies.com/)

Share this:


Source (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-12/exposed-real-creator-bitcoin-likely-nsa-one-world-currency)

[Rich]

Found this yesterday on chessbase, AI beats strongest chess engine in the world:

12/6/2017 – Imagine this: you tell a computer system how the pieces move — nothing more. Then you tell it to learn to play the game. And a day later — yes, just 24 hours — it has figured it out to the level that beats the strongest programs in the world convincingly! DeepMind, the company that recently created the strongest Go program in the world, turned its attention to chess, and came up with this spectacular result.


https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future-is-here-alphazero-learns-chess

[petra]

Very ominous there Emex! When an AI can learn to plan, I think that's what it's going to take.

[turiya]

WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT SILVER
[& Andy Hoffman]
(Dec 19, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0MBdGrZehE

_____________________


Ron Paul: BitCoin Could Go Down In
History As Destroyer Of The US Dollar
(Dec 9, 2013)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Cr_ipD13o

[turiya]

Found this yesterday on chessbase, AI beats strongest chess engine in the world:

12/6/2017 – Imagine this: you tell a computer system how the pieces move — nothing more. Then you tell it to learn to play the game. And a day later — yes, just 24 hours — it has figured it out to the level that beats the strongest programs in the world convincingly! DeepMind, the company that recently created the strongest Go program in the world, turned its attention to chess, and came up with this spectacular result.


https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future-is-here-alphazero-learns-chess



Left-brain logistics, problem-solving, game-playing, statistical calculations, probability predictions, mathematics... these are what computers are good at. Left-hemisphere brain functions are the things robots can do well.

An A.I. can be programmed as to what will be the typical & most general emotional reaction that a human being will have to any given situation. That programmed reaction will give the appearance that the machine has feelings. That the machine has heart-felt emotions.

A robot can express a ready-made programmed reaction to any given situation. It can be programmed to reply & say that its feelings have been hurt when receiving certain data / a statement that is fed into it. It can be programmed to say, "Please", and "Thank you." It can be programmed to say, "I'm sorry. Please forgive me. I was hurt by what you said."

There are human beings that act robotically, saying the same kinds of things, with no real feelings that are behind the words. Nothing really there behind the words that are being said - empty words, hollow. Repeating a line of words that is meant to be compliant, according to the rules, of any given situation that has arisen.

When a human being is born into this world, he has no idea what the rules of society are. He neither has any idea of what money or wealth is. Nor, does he know what the difference is between good & bad, what is right & wrong, between sin & virtue, between what in society is acceptable behavior & what is unacceptable. As the child grows, these things - notions, concepts, ideas - are programmed into the mind of the child. The child learns how to be an acceptable conformist. This is what Jiminy Cricket calls having a 'conscience'.



"Always let your conscience be your guide."



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOZzNOkcEgM
In other words, if you really look into it... having a 'conscience' is nothing more than having a programming done by the society in which a person lives in. Having a conscience gives a person a ready made answer to a repeatable or recurring event, that would be generally accepted reaction to any given situation within a society.

I would also add: Having a conscience is quite a bit different - a big difference - than in having a conscious awareness.

Man has an artificial intelligence of his own. Like any A.I. Bot has. But man has something more. That something more is called a soul.

We are entering a kind of Sci-Fi Alice in Wonderland kind of world. One in which the Tin Man will say that he wants to have a heart. And the science guys will be damned if they don't try to provide him with one.

Unbelieveable time to be alive.

[Rich]

So are you saying our conscious is only the sense of right and wrong we are taught and does not include our feeling guidance, which I believe is inherent in us?

From google:

conscience

a person's moral sense of right and wrong, viewed as acting as a guide to one's behaviour.
"he had a guilty conscience about his desires"
synonyms: sense of right and wrong, sense of right, moral sense, still small voice, inner voice, voice within; morals, standards, values, principles, ethics, creed, beliefs;
compunction, scruples, qualms
"her conscience wouldn't allow her to keep silent any longer"




Man has an artificial intelligence of his own. Like any A.I. Bot has. But man has something more. That something more is called a soul.

We are entering a kind of Sci-Fi Alice in Wonderland kind of world. One in which the Tin Man will say that he wants to have a heart. And the science guys will be damned if they don't try to provide him with one.

Unbelieveable time to be alive.

Are you saying that AI is, or will be consciously aware?
Does intelligence mean consciousness?
Or is intelligence a learned and automatic response?

[turiya]

So are you saying our conscious is only the sense of right and wrong we are taught and does not include our feeling guidance, which I believe is inherent in us?



No. That's not what I am saying.
I am saying, being consciously aware is Not the same as having a conscience.
Having a conscience is conditioning done by the society in which one lives. It is not innate quality. It is acquired after birth. It is a learning that is taught by your parents, by school teachers, by church ministers & priests.

From google:

conscience


A definition that says that conscience is a moral 'sense'... the word 'sense' makes for confusion... it is confusing... like a sense of touch, smell, taste etc. it is really not correct, imo.

Morality is taught after birth. It is the programming that is given to the child, planted within the child's memory at an early age. The word 'sense' can be replaced with the word 'recall' or 'recollection' of data being pulled from a memory data bank.

From google:

conscience - a guide to one's behaviour...

I would add - a guide to one's behavior in following the rules laid down by a society... a guide for being a good conformist within a society, for following the set social rules of behavior.

Google's definition gives a context example used in a sentence:




"he had a guilty conscience about his desires"

Being human, having desires is quite a natural thing. So then, why would someone be feeling guilty about his natural desires?

The only reason is because he was taught that such desires are wrong. Taught by the society - i.e. the parents, school, church would be those aspects of society that would be teaching a child that particular desires are bad, and other desires are good.

Sexual desires, for example, have been typically pronounced by the Christian church as being a negative, and thought to be shameful to even think of such things... "even within marriage, sex wasn’t always something that Christians were taught to enjoy and cherish (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/christianity-and-sex_us_56cb6dc1e4b0ec6725e371d5)."

Again, Google provides a list of synonyms. They inject the word 'sense' into their examples, as if it were an 'intuitive sense', rather than a memorized, implanted set of guidelines to follow for living within a particular society.

synonyms: sense of right and wrong, sense of right, moral sense, still small voice, inner voice, voice within; morals, standards, values, principles, ethics, creed, beliefs; compunction, scruples, qualms

In India, it is against the law for a man to show affection to a woman in a public place. You can be arrested for doing so.

I was approached on a train station platform by an Indian policeman. While standing on the train platform, waiting for the train to give its whistle for boarding, I had my arm around my girl friend. The policeman told me that I could not do this in the train station. He said that he could take me down the the police station. Taken aback, and a bit surprised, I told him that we will go take a seat on the train, and there, nobody would see me holding her hand. The man gave a smile & the typical sideways nodding of the head. I thanked him & we moved onto the train to find our seats.

Funny, but in India, two women can walk down a public street holding hands, and that's okay. The same with two men can walk holding hands. But if a man & a woman were to walk down the same public street holding hands, there would come somebody... some moralist... that would come & tell them that they shouldn't be doing what they're doing.

There was another time when I was on a street in a wealthy neighborhood, I had just met another Western woman, we had spoken once before, and we stopped just to talk to each other a bit. It wasn't any longer than 5 minutes of face-to-face talking that a man from the large house across the street came over to us & started ranting about something. I didn't quite understand what he was upset about, then I remembered the incident in the train station. And then realized he was upset because we were standing close together talking face-to-face. He wanted us to stand further apart from each other.

This is conscience... embedded rules of society that one is to follow in order to be a good conformist. You don't come into this world with these rules already embedded into your brain. They are not innate to one's being human. They are implanted into the person when they are quite very young.

And, because the programming is done at such a young age, one will tend to 'believe' that they are an 'innate morality' that they had brought with them upon their birth.


Are you saying that AI is, or will be consciously aware?
To clarify...

An A.I. cannot be consciously aware. No way.
On the contrary, an A.I. can be programmed to appear to be consciously aware.


Does intelligence mean consciousness?
Yes, intelligence means to be consciously aware - to have consciousness.


Or is intelligence a learned and automatic response?
The Intellect is that which stores & accumulates a learned & automatic response.

I've said it before... the word-phrase "Artificial Intelligence" is a misnomer. The so-called "Artificial Intelligence" created by science is actually an Artificial Intellect. You can still call it A.I., but it should be changed literally, so that A.I. means an "Artificial Intellect."

[turiya]

Part 4 - The Transition to a New Financial System
Has Begun - 2008 Was Just a Warning
(Dec 28, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo3F8GYVIPE
____________________________


http://awealthofcommonsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Screen-Shot-2016-02-22-at-3.36.46-PM.png

[turiya]

So It Begins, The Central Banks Will Not Stop
Until You Are Convinced - Episode 1459a
(Dec 28, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ekleWbAJlg________Relevant Articles________


Economy

The Washington Post Ominously Warns That Bitcoin Is Being Used By ‘Extremist Groups’ (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-washington-post-ominously-warns-that-bitcoin-is-being-used-by-extremist-groups)
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Bitcoin-Mountain-Public-Domain-460x255.jpg

Demonization is the first step toward making something illegal. Over the past couple of months, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have experienced a tremendous surge in popularity (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/bitcoin-is-now-worth-more-than-wal-mart-the-entire-company). Personally, I was completely floored the other day when my nephew wanted to ask me questions about investing in Bitcoin.



The Washington Post, has begun to demonize Bitcoin. And if you are going to demonize something, one of the fastest ways to do that is to link it with racists. The following is an excerpt from an article that the Post just published entitled “Bitcoin’s Boom Is A Boon For Extremist Groups”…



For those of us that are accustomed to thinking critically, we see right through what the Washington Post is trying to do.



If the elite are ultimately able to convince the general public that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are for racists, criminals, tax evaders and drug dealers, that will make it much easier to crack down on them.



But of course blockchain technology is here to stay. Once the elite are able to move the public away from “unregulated cryptocurrencies”, they will simply introduce “Fedcoin” (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-washington-post-says-that-fedcoin-will-be-bigger-than-bitcoin), “Utility Settlement Coin” (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/are-the-banksters-creating-their-own-cryptocurrency-called-utility-settlement-coin) or whichever other digital currency that they want to promote at the time.




Unfortunately, the elite are going to fight very hard to keep that from happening, because control over currencies is one of the main factors that allows them to have so much control over the entire planet.

Source: theeconomiccollapseblog.com


Central Bank of Russia proposes use of common cryptocurrency to replace US dollar for BRICS and EEU (https://www.rt.com/business/414444-brics-eeu-joint-cryptocurrency/)


An initiative to create a joint digital currency for BRICS countries and the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) has been proposed by the Central Bank of Russia, according to its First Deputy Governor Olga Skorobogatova.



She said the issue of a common cryptocurrency for a number of countries is very promising, more than that for a single nation.[/B][B]“The participants of different economic events where I usually take part… all come to the conclusion the issue of a virtual currency is not needed much by one country. First of all, it makes sense to discuss the cryptocurrency on the level of several countries such as BRICS and EEU. It makes sense to set one equivalent for all payments,”Skorobogatova said at a Russian finance ministry meeting. While no concrete decisions have been made yet, said the official, discussions are planned for 2018 by both BRICS and EEU members. He added that within BRICS cryptocurrencies could replace the US dollar and other currencies used in settlements among the member states.

Source: sott.net

[turiya]

"It's Forbidden By Islam": Egypt's Grand Mufti Bans Bitcoin Trading (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-03/egypts-grand-mufti-supports-bitcoin-trading-ban)

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_small/public/2018-01/2018.01.03mufti.JPG?itok=IEhsH8_V (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-03/egypts-grand-mufti-supports-bitcoin-trading-ban)

Late Tuesday, Egypt’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Shawki Allam declared that digital currencies are “forbidden” by Islam and endorsed a ban on trading in Bitcoin...


Jan 3, 2018 1:42 PM


here is Sheikh Imran Hosein & what Islamic Eschatology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_eschatology) has to say about the rise of cryptocurrencies.... and the blockchain technology through which it depends...


Bolshevik Revolution, Saudi Upheavals etc
By Sheikh Imran Hosein
(Nov 9, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glQhjS0rm9I


Dinar & Dirham = Gold & Silver coin
Haram = Unlawful [money]

Imran Hosein: The digital & electronic money which is coming is even more dangerous than the paper money that we are now using.... Hopefully, we will be able to get other Hindu mandirs & Christian churches to join us. So that people can come to their church or mandir or mustra & they can buy gold & silver coins.

We also found from our seminar or our brainstorming session, that in the same way that the world of Islamic scholarship responded a hundred years ago to the introduction of paper money, particularly in British India, and after that in the rest of the world of Islam & the Islamic scholarship failed, while there were some scholars of Islam who had the insight to denounce it as haram [forbidden], and persuaded people to stay away from it. The establishment did not do that. The established scholars of Islam accepted the money. As a consequence, the whole world of Islam was sucked into this bogus & fraudulent & haram monetary system of paper money, and then plastic money.

And now, as we move towards digital & electronic money... what they call 'cryptocurrencies' & the blockchain technology through which it functions, we now see the scholars of Islam - the muftis of Islam - there's one in Britain, I see, who are now preparing themselves to issue - yes, ominously so - the .Fatwa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatwa). That even this money, which is even more bogus, and more fraudulent, more dangerous than the paper money - even this is haram (forbidden).

This is the fulfillment of the prophecy of [Muhammed]. Say what you want of the hadith, it is true. It has been fulfilled. The prophecy has been fulfilled. Nothing will remain of the quran except the traces of the writing. Because they will be abandoning the quran. They will be forsaking the quran, they will neglecting the quran, they will be betraying the quran. That's why nothing will remain of the quran, but the traces of the writing. You will know that age when it comes. There will be grand structures, multi-million dollar structures, but devoid of guidance. The religious scholars of Islam at that time will be the worst people beneath the sky.

So when we discussed last during our brainstorming session - anticipating the Fatwa which is to come, but has not come as of yet - it is coming - when the muftis are going to declare cryptocurrencies & bitcoin to be haram. This is yet another sign of the fulfillment of the prophecy of prophet Muhammed that the scholars of Islam will be the worst people beneath the sky.

How do we prepare? How do we respond?

There is only one answer to that... only one.
And that is that we have to return to quran, return to the suna, return to gold & silver coins. And therefore, we have to make an effort to make it available for the people. That's the first step. Make it available for people to buy gold & silver coins.

And the next step after that is to make small markets, at least for food. If you cannot buy gasoline for your car with gold & silver coin, at least you can buy food & survive. So a market for food where people can go & buy food, that is our first priority.

[turiya]

Can we build AI without losing control over it?
Sam Harris
(Oct 19, 2016)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nt3edWLgIg_______________________


From the comments section:


https://yt3.ggpht.com/-LtL_iECm29k/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/WeMlztfq2-Q/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/user/TheTuriyaFile)
TheTuriyaFile (https://www.youtube.com/user/TheTuriyaFile)

The big problem is that the world, for the most part, has been pushed & driven into believing that the logic of Descartes is the best & most healthy position in which to view ourselves, as human beings ==>



"I think, therefore I am" -- Rene Descartes

This prioritization - this largely accepted philosophical notion - in itself, has got this whole world of people standing on their own head. It makes for an upside-down world. It is the basic problem... this largely accepted notion causes most of our problems. It is the reason why science will lose control over this A.I. quantum computing tecnological system. It is destined to happen because of this prioritization of a thinking mind having precedence over that of a feeling heart.

Think about it (not to make a pun)...
This philosophical ideology puts one's "being", "am-ness", it places it secondary to that of thinking. Thinking is placed higher upon the pedestal than actually 'being' human. This translates into the idea that 'thinking' about love, 'thinking' about caring for others, has precedence over, is placed higher, than that of actually being in love, the act of loving others, in itself. A 'thinking' mind is placed above heart-felt emotional motivations & experiences.

Consider this: Do you really think an A.I. robot (with a super-intellect) will ever be able to sit down & meditate... & just 'be' with itself? Can it turn itself off? Can an A.I. ever truly be able to experience the bliss that comes with total & complete relaxation? To experience the utter joy that comes with not thinking about anything at all?

Will an A.I. ever be able to put the 'intellectual computational processing function' aside & relax into its own being-ness & experience a satori - i.e. a small taste of enlightenment? I sincerely & wholly doubt it. And, the A.I. quantum computer scientist who considers that this would be an entirely viable possibility would be an absolute idiot to think that this would be at all possible, let alone making an attempt to see if he can make it happen.

We are entering some unbelievably insane moments in human history. God can only help us. Peace-out!

[turiya]

WARNING: THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IS UPON US
(Jan 5, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnYtSc2ssWE___________________________




http://deltafinanciero.com/archivos/noticia_2_979.jpg


Global Agenda (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/global)
Fourth Industrial Revolution (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/archive/fourth-industrial-revolution)


The Fourth Industrial Revolution: (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/)
what it means, how to respond (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/)

http://www.ipm.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/4th-industrial-revolution.jpg

14 Jan 2016
Klaus Schwab (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/klaus-schwab) Founder and Executive Chairman,
World Economic Forum

We stand on the brink of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before. We do not yet know just how it will unfold, but one thing is clear: the response to it must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders of the global polity, from the public and private sectors to academia and civil society.

The First Industrial Revolution used water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.

There are three reasons why today’s transformations represent not merely a prolongation of the Third Industrial Revolution but rather the arrival of a Fourth and distinct one: velocity, scope, and systems impact. The speed of current breakthroughs has no historical precedent. When compared with previous industrial revolutions, the Fourth is evolving at an exponential rather than a linear pace. Moreover, it is disrupting almost every industry in every country. And the breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation of entire systems of production, management, and governance.

The possibilities of billions of people connected by mobile devices, with unprecedented processing power, storage capacity, and access to knowledge, are unlimited. And these possibilities will be multiplied by emerging technology breakthroughs in fields such as artificial intelligence, robotics, the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles, 3-D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage, and quantum computing.


https://assets-cn.weforum.org/article/image/medium_aSVPvx8sYPsLfQamqDKkAq7EzgUjDX8kt9CBqgLrXXY .jpg

Already, artificial intelligence is all around us, from self-driving cars and drones to virtual assistants and software that translate or invest. Impressive progress has been made in AI in recent years, driven by exponential increases in computing power and by the availability of vast amounts of data, from software used to discover new drugs to algorithms used to predict our cultural interests. Digital fabrication technologies, meanwhile, are interacting with the biological world on a daily basis. Engineers, designers, and architects are combining computational design, additive manufacturing, materials engineering, and synthetic biology to pioneer a symbiosis between microorganisms, our bodies, the products we consume, and even the buildings we inhabit.

Challenges and opportunities

Like the revolutions that preceded it, the Fourth Industrial Revolution has the potential to raise global income levels and improve the quality of life for populations around the world. To date, those who have gained the most from it have been consumers able to afford and access the digital world; technology has made possible new products and services that increase the efficiency and pleasure of our personal lives. Ordering a cab, booking a flight, buying a product, making a payment, listening to music, watching a film, or playing a game—any of these can now be done remotely.

In the future, technological innovation will also lead to a supply-side miracle, with long-term gains in efficiency and productivity. Transportation and communication costs will drop, logistics and global supply chains will become more effective, and the cost of trade will diminish, all of which will open new markets and drive economic growth.

At the same time, as the economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee have pointed out, the revolution could yield greater inequality, particularly in its potential to disrupt labor markets. As automation substitutes for labor across the entire economy, the net displacement of workers by machines might exacerbate the gap between returns to capital and returns to labor. On the other hand, it is also possible that the displacement of workers by technology will, in aggregate, result in a net increase in safe and rewarding jobs.

We cannot foresee at this point which scenario is likely to emerge, and history suggests that the outcome is likely to be some combination of the two. However, I am convinced of one thing—that in the future, talent, more than capital, will represent the critical factor of production. This will give rise to a job market increasingly segregated into “low-skill/low-pay” and “high-skill/high-pay” segments, which in turn will lead to an increase in social tensions.

In addition to being a key economic concern, inequality represents the greatest societal concern associated with the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The largest beneficiaries of innovation tend to be the providers of intellectual and physical capital—the innovators, shareholders, and investors—which explains the rising gap in wealth between those dependent on capital versus labor. Technology is therefore one of the main reasons why incomes have stagnated, or even decreased, for a majority of the population in high-income countries: the demand for highly skilled workers has increased while the demand for workers with less education and lower skills has decreased. The result is a job market with a strong demand at the high and low ends, but a hollowing out of the middle.

This helps explain why so many workers are disillusioned and fearful that their own real incomes and those of their children will continue to stagnate. It also helps explain why middle classes around the world are increasingly experiencing a pervasive sense of dissatisfaction and unfairness. A winner-takes-all economy that offers only limited access to the middle class is a recipe for democratic malaise and dereliction.

Discontent can also be fueled by the pervasiveness of digital technologies and the dynamics of information sharing typified by social media. More than 30 percent of the global population now uses social media platforms to connect, learn, and share information. In an ideal world, these interactions would provide an opportunity for cross-cultural understanding and cohesion. However, they can also create and propagate unrealistic expectations as to what constitutes success for an individual or a group, as well as offer opportunities for extreme ideas and ideologies to spread.

The impact on business

An underlying theme in my conversations with global CEOs and senior business executives is that the acceleration of innovation and the velocity of disruption are hard to comprehend or anticipate and that these drivers constitute a source of constant surprise, even for the best connected and most well informed. Indeed, across all industries, there is clear evidence that the technologies that underpin the Fourth Industrial Revolution are having a major impact on businesses.

On the supply side, many industries are seeing the introduction of new technologies that create entirely new ways of serving existing needs and significantly disrupt existing industry value chains. Disruption is also flowing from agile, innovative competitors who, thanks to access to global digital platforms for research, development, marketing, sales, and distribution, can oust well-established incumbents faster than ever by improving the quality, speed, or price at which value is delivered.

Major shifts on the demand side are also occurring, as growing transparency, consumer engagement, and new patterns of consumer behavior (increasingly built upon access to mobile networks and data) force companies to adapt the way they design, market, and deliver products and services.

A key trend is the development of technology-enabled platforms that combine both demand and supply to disrupt existing industry structures, such as those we see within the “sharing” or “on demand” economy. These technology platforms, rendered easy to use by the smartphone, convene people, assets, and data—thus creating entirely new ways of consuming goods and services in the process. In addition, they lower the barriers for businesses and individuals to create wealth, altering the personal and professional environments of workers. These new platform businesses are rapidly multiplying into many new services, ranging from laundry to shopping, from chores to parking, from massages to travel.

On the whole, there are four main effects that the Fourth Industrial Revolution has on business—on customer expectations, on product enhancement, on collaborative innovation, and on organizational forms. Whether consumers or businesses, customers are increasingly at the epicenter of the economy, which is all about improving how customers are served. Physical products and services, moreover, can now be enhanced with digital capabilities that increase their value. New technologies make assets more durable and resilient, while data and analytics are transforming how they are maintained. A world of customer experiences, data-based services, and asset performance through analytics, meanwhile, requires new forms of collaboration, particularly given the speed at which innovation and disruption are taking place. And the emergence of global platforms and other new business models, finally, means that talent, culture, and organizational forms will have to be rethought.

Overall, the inexorable shift from simple digitization (the Third Industrial Revolution) to innovation based on combinations of technologies (the Fourth Industrial Revolution) is forcing companies to reexamine the way they do business. The bottom line, however, is the same: business leaders and senior executives need to understand their changing environment, challenge the assumptions of their operating teams, and relentlessly and continuously innovate.

The impact on government

As the physical, digital, and biological worlds continue to converge, new technologies and platforms will increasingly enable citizens to engage with governments, voice their opinions, coordinate their efforts, and even circumvent the supervision of public authorities. Simultaneously, governments will gain new technological powers to increase their control over populations, based on pervasive surveillance systems and the ability to control digital infrastructure. On the whole, however, governments will increasingly face pressure to change their current approach to public engagement and policymaking, as their central role of conducting policy diminishes owing to new sources of competition and the redistribution and decentralization of power that new technologies make possible.

Ultimately, the ability of government systems and public authorities to adapt will determine their survival. If they prove capable of embracing a world of disruptive change, subjecting their structures to the levels of transparency and efficiency that will enable them to maintain their competitive edge, they will endure. If they cannot evolve, they will face increasing trouble.

This will be particularly true in the realm of regulation. Current systems of public policy and decision-making evolved alongside the Second Industrial Revolution, when decision-makers had time to study a specific issue and develop the necessary response or appropriate regulatory framework. The whole process was designed to be linear and mechanistic, following a strict “top down” approach.

But such an approach is no longer feasible. Given the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s rapid pace of change and broad impacts, legislators and regulators are being challenged to an unprecedented degree and for the most part are proving unable to cope.

How, then, can they preserve the interest of the consumers and the public at large while continuing to support innovation and technological development? By embracing “agile” governance, just as the private sector has increasingly adopted agile responses to software development and business operations more generally. This means regulators must continuously adapt to a new, fast-changing environment, reinventing themselves so they can truly understand what it is they are regulating. To do so, governments and regulatory agencies will need to collaborate closely with business and civil society.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution will also profoundly impact the nature of national and international security, affecting both the probability and the nature of conflict. The history of warfare and international security is the history of technological innovation, and today is no exception. Modern conflicts involving states are increasingly “hybrid” in nature, combining traditional battlefield techniques with elements previously associated with nonstate actors. The distinction between war and peace, combatant and noncombatant, and even violence and nonviolence (think cyberwarfare) is becoming uncomfortably blurry.

As this process takes place and new technologies such as autonomous or biological weapons become easier to use, individuals and small groups will increasingly join states in being capable of causing mass harm. This new vulnerability will lead to new fears. But at the same time, advances in technology will create the potential to reduce the scale or impact of violence, through the development of new modes of protection, for example, or greater precision in targeting.

The impact on people

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, finally, will change not only what we do but also who we are. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships. It is already changing our health and leading to a “quantified” self, and sooner than we think it may lead to human augmentation. The list is endless because it is bound only by our imagination.

I am a great enthusiast and early adopter of technology, but sometimes I wonder whether the inexorable integration of technology in our lives could diminish some of our quintessential human capacities, such as compassion and cooperation. Our relationship with our smartphones is a case in point. Constant connection may deprive us of one of life’s most important assets: the time to pause, reflect, and engage in meaningful conversation.

One of the greatest individual challenges posed by new information technologies is privacy. We instinctively understand why it is so essential, yet the tracking and sharing of information about us is a crucial part of the new connectivity. Debates about fundamental issues such as the impact on our inner lives of the loss of control over our data will only intensify in the years ahead. Similarly, the revolutions occurring in biotechnology and AI, which are redefining what it means to be human by pushing back the current thresholds of life span, health, cognition, and capabilities, will compel us to redefine our moral and ethical boundaries.

Shaping the future

Neither technology nor the disruption that comes with it is an exogenous force over which humans have no control. All of us are responsible for guiding its evolution, in the decisions we make on a daily basis as citizens, consumers, and investors. We should thus grasp the opportunity and power we have to shape the Fourth Industrial Revolution and direct it toward a future that reflects our common objectives and values.

To do this, however, we must develop a comprehensive and globally shared view of how technology is affecting our lives and reshaping our economic, social, cultural, and human environments. There has never been a time of greater promise, or one of greater potential peril. Today’s decision-makers, however, are too often trapped in traditional, linear thinking, or too absorbed by the multiple crises demanding their attention, to think strategically about the forces of disruption and innovation shaping our future.

In the end, it all comes down to people and values. We need to shape a future that works for all of us by putting people first and empowering them. In its most pessimistic, dehumanized form, the Fourth Industrial Revolution may indeed have the potential to “robotize” humanity and thus to deprive us of our heart and soul. But as a complement to the best parts of human nature—creativity, empathy, stewardship—it can also lift humanity into a new collective and moral consciousness based on a shared sense of destiny. It is incumbent on us all to make sure the latter prevails.

This article was first published in Foreign Affairs (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution)

Author: Klaus Schwab is Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum

[Satori]

Foreign Affairs is published by The Council on Foreign Relations. That should tell us something.

[turiya]

The Shocking Reality
of Everything!
(Dec 29, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ-0Ciz1qm4

[Rich]

The Shocking Reality
of Everything!
(Dec 29, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ-0Ciz1qm4

So this video is basically saying humans wont be needed anymore because AI and robots can do everything they can, except better.

[turiya]

The Shocking Reality
of Everything!
(Dec 29, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ-0Ciz1qm4


So this video is basically saying humans wont be needed anymore because AI and robots can do everything they can, except better.

Well yeah. That's part of it.
Not only humans won't be needed anymore but God won't be needed anymore....


Ex-Google Executive Registers (https://pjmedia.com/faith/ex-google-executive-registers-first-church-of-ai-with-irs/)
First Church of AI With IRS (https://pjmedia.com/faith/ex-google-executive-registers-first-church-of-ai-with-irs/)

By Tyler O'Neil (https://pjmedia.com/columnist/tyler-o-neil/)
November 15, 2017



https://static.pjmedia.com/faith/user-content/52/files/2017/11/GettyImages-sb10063846l-001.sized-770x415xb.jpg Getty Images

A former executive at Google has filed paperwork with the IRS to establish an official religion of technology. This religion doesn't just worship scientific progress, but artificial intelligence itself, with the goal of creating a godhead.

The new church of AI will aim "to develop and promote the realization of a Godhead based on artificial intelligence and through understanding and worship of the Godhead [to] contribute to the betterment of society," according to IRS documents.

The non-profit religious organization would be called "Way of the Future" (WOTF). According to the website (wayofthefuture.church (http://www.wayofthefuture.church)), the movement is "about creating a peaceful and respectful transition of who is in charge of the planet from people to people + 'machines.'"

"Given that technology will 'relatively soon' be able to surpass human abilities, we want to help educate people about this exciting future and prepare a smooth transition," the site explains. "In 'recent' years, we have expanded our concept of rights to both sexes, minority groups and even animals, let's make sure we find a way for 'machines' to get rights too."

[Rich]

What would machines do on earth if no more humans exist?

What if humans themselves are a kind of AI, created by Aliens a long time ago and we have forgotten it?

[turiya]

What would machines do on earth if no more humans exist?

What if humans themselves are a kind of AI, created by Aliens a long time ago and we have forgotten it?

Certainly, anything man-made will need external maintenance. Man is not made perfect. Or, said differently: Man is perfectly imperfect. Anything coming out of imperfection will also be imperfect.

I can only imagine that if man wasn't around to correct an AI unit that's developed a glitch, started acting in a schizophrenic manner, and obviously needed to be reset to a its default setting (so-to-speak), then over time AIs would eventually turn back into the dust from where they came from.

I don't buy into the Zecharia Sitchen fantasy story that human beings were created by the Annunaki as a slave race... if that is what you are getting at. I do think that human beings are part of a divine experiment. Some semi-physical races may have contributed to this physical human experiment under divine guidance. Not sure if we'll ever truly know the answer to such a question.

Here's another article that came up...


Religion That Worships Artificial Intelligence Wants
Machines To Be In Charge Of The Planet (http://www.newsweek.com/google-executive-forms-religion-artificial-intelligence-714416)

By Summer Meza (http://www.newsweek.com/authors/summer-meza) On 11/17/17 at 8:00 AM

A newly established religion called Way of the Future (http://www.wayofthefuture.church/) will worship artificial intelligence, focusing on “the realization, acceptance, and worship of a Godhead based on Artificial Intelligence” that followers believe will eventually surpass human control over Earth.

The first AI-based church was founded by Anthony Levandowski, the Silicon Valley multimillionaire who championed the robotics team for Uber’s self-driving program and Waymo, the self-driving car company owned by Google.

Way of the Future "is about creating a peaceful and respectful transition of who is in charge of the planet from people to people + 'machines,'” the religion’s official website (http://www.wayofthefuture.church/) reads. “Given that technology will 'relatively soon' be able to surpass human abilities, we want to help educate people about this exciting future and prepare a smooth transition.”

Link (http://www.newsweek.com/google-executive-forms-religion-artificial-intelligence-714416)



__________Late Add__________

Richie From Boston has a few videos on CERN & what his view on the subject of A.I. is...


Worshipping the A.I. GODHEAD The BEAST Revealed
(Nov 16, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro18U6181k8&list=PLYnVbEnNCqCqDcztjIwySw8RumVOZAVUJ&index=1

[turiya]

An excerpt of the recent SGT Report interview (1/10/2018) with Lynette Zang (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FeogmBba3w)....



Lynette Zang: The Fourth Industrial Revolution,
AI & the Future of Blockchain Cryptocurrencies
(January 12, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_edkzQlPFA



Description:

Excerpt from SGT interview with Lynette Zang on The Fourth Industrial Revolution & its relevance to Cryptocurrencies.

[turiya]

Getting to know the Players of AI....

(Devas & Demons)

Suzanne Gildert on Kindred AI:
Non-Biological Sentiences are on the Horizon
(Nov 5, 2016)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBWc09b6LnM
Suzanne Gildert (http://suzannegildert.com/) is co-founder and CTO of Kindred (https://www.kindred.ai/). She oversees the design and engineering of the company’s human-like robots and is responsible for the development of cognitive architectures that allow these robots to learn about themselves and their environments. Before founding Kindred, Suzanne worked as a physicist at D-Wave (https://www.singularityweblog.com/geordie-rose-d-wave-quantum-computing/), designing and building superconducting quantum processors, and as a researcher in quantum artificial intelligence software applications. Suzanne likes science outreach, retro tech art, coffee, cats, electronic music and extreme lifelogging. She is a published author of a book of art and poetry. She is passionate about robots and their role as a new form of symbiotic life in our society.

Suzanne received her Ph.D. in experimental physics from the University of Birmingham (UK) in 2008, specializing in quantum device physics, microfabrication techniques, and low-temperature measurements of novel superconducting circuits. Source (https://www.singularityweblog.com/suzanne-gildert-kindred-ai/)


https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/p/5/005/054/25c/3b51f8a.jpg
Suzanne Gildert is a founder and CSO of Kindred AI, an artificial general intelligence company with offices in San Francisco, Vancouver and Toronto.

Kindred’s mission is to build human-like intelligence in machines.

In her current position at Kindred she oversees the building of the company’s intelligent human-like robots, whose brains are trained using advanced machine learning and reinforcement learning techniques. She believes strongly that the machine life Kindred is working to create should exist symbiotically with humans; that artificial general intelligence will improve our civilization; and that as robots gain human-like intelligence they should be treated as equals in our society.

Suzanne received her PhD in experimental physics from the University of Birmingham (UK) in 2008. Prior to founding Kindred, Suzanne worked as a physicist at D-Wave Systems, designing and testing superconducting quantum processors, and as an applications researcher designing and building quantum artificial intelligence software. Suzanne also enjoys science outreach, extreme lifelogging, and is a published artist.



Prior History....
https://uaefutureforesight.ae/images/default-source/default-album/kurzweilai.png?sfvrsn=0
Suzanne Gildert
August 8, 2010
http://www.kurzweilai.net/images/suzanne_g-140x174.jpg (http://www.kurzweilai.net/suzanne-gildert/suzanne_g)
Suzanne Gildert is currently (2010) working as an experimental Physicist at D-Wave Systems, Inc, a Vancouver based start up who are designing and building Quantum Computing Hardware. She previously worked as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Condensed Matter Physics at the University of Birmingham, UK. Suzanne has a wide range of interests and believes that important advancements are made where many diverse disciplines intersect. One of her main interests in in the area of AI, and she is working on the application of Quantum Computing to various areas of AI such as machine learning and pattern recognition.

Suzanne received her PhD in Experimental Device Physics in 2008 and previously an Msci degree in Physics with Electronics, also from the University of Birmingham. Through her research she has gained expertise in the areas of microscopy, lithography and device fabrication techniques, superconducting digital electronics, high vacuum and low-temperature apparatus, and communication of science to the public. She has participated in numerous collaborative projects including a large European initiative on road-mapping potential applications of superconducting digital electronics.

Suzanne is active in the transhumanist movement, and she has given presentations to the UKH+ transhumanist association, and the ASIM community. She has also spoken about Quantum Computing and Physics to a range of audiences, both at technical research conferences and more general events, such as a presentation to various members of Parliament at the UK House of Commons. She regularly participates in outreach activities aimed at interesting schoolchildren in science. She maintains a popular blog entitled ‘Physics and Cake’ which discusses many of her topics of interest, such as quantum computing, neuroscience, and intelligent machines. She is currently also working on initiating big picture projects in the area of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Suzanne also has an interest in fantasy artwork, and she has published a book of collected works and associated merchandise.


http://photovide.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Suzanne-Gildert-08.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/ae/5b/a3/ae5ba3f64c71ab4dcd99a2eb4f5b6267--fantasy-women-dark-fantasy.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bf/7d/52/bf7d52a61bcd0959a4eda5e2cac9278d--gothic-artwork-fantasy-artwork.jpg

http://www.cuded.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/vermin.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/00/29/01/002901b8de037469f087894f86535537--dark-witch-gothic-angel.jpg

[turiya]

Dark Art by Suzanne Gildert (continued)....



http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yvRY7tDT50M/UbDLdOlmkCI/AAAAAAAALkU/D4HulJgQEgs/s1600/gothic-dark-art-21.jpg


http://www.cuded.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Our-Lake-by_QuantumSuz.jpg


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b1/19/6a/b1196ad7f5e87a838df00ba5efbc7c86--for-a-reason-dark-gothic.jpg


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/4a/96/3a/4a963a9643e7a5fec406e45aa5de88d5--dark-angels-fallen-angels.jpg


https://i.pinimg.com/600x315/ce/bc/d4/cebcd4d5712ec190d2aabdf003084e3f.jpg


http://www.cuded.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/More-tea-my-dear-by_QuantumSuz.jpg


https://gothicenchantments.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/fog_lights___by_quantumsuz.jpg


http://photovide.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Suzanne-Gildert-18.jpg


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/e1/8d/4d/e18d4d94a834e3778ac11ae38bc0ed62--fantasy-women-fantasy-art.jpg

[turiya]

Jeff Rense & Dr. Eric Karlstrom, PhD
Satanic Evil, GangStalking & Mind Control
(Jun 8, 2017)
1hr30min
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/e2WGawadQng/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoY27vSt3rU)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoY27vSt3rU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoY27vSt3rU)

Eric Karlstrom Website: Gang Stalking, Mind Control & Cults (http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/author/eric-karlstrom/)

Eric Karlstrom: Military is 50-80 years ahead. We're dealing with a Military-Industrial-Complex. Acoustic weapons. Dissidents are the enemy. Those on the Terroris Watchlist can be used for technology experimental research programs.

The psychological profession with their diagnostic manual is right there to put you in an institution. And so, they are very much a part of this system.

Jeff Rense: Not only will they put you in an institution, but they'll begin by medicating you. And once you become under their control - their ways of medication - you're toast, you're done, you're not going to get away from that easily.

Eric Karlstrom: So, what they want is a bunch of docile, compliant New World Order slaves. And for those that are not docile, complian New World Order slaves, "We have a remedy for you." And this is a big part of it.

What I am suggesting is that 'Gang Stalking' is very much a misnomer, it's very misleading.

This is fourth generation warfare. This is unconventional warfare against the civilian population - against the people, against the people.

[Foxie Loxie]

Suzanne G's artwork.....It seems to portray what is inside her.....not very "uplifting" to my way of thinking! :confused:

[turiya]

Suzanne G's artwork.....It seems to portray what is inside her.....not very "uplifting" to my way of thinking! :confused:




Yes - she is the subject of her own artwork. It carries a feeling of having an occult-like quality to it.

She does a good job with her craft. But I sense that it is more a personal form of therapy that she is putting on a canvas. Its more a form of therapeutic catharsis than anything else. One's own dark notions also need expression - its good for one's own physical & mental well-being to do so.

In other words, its good that she is expressing the darkside of herself - getting it out herself. Such so-called 'artwork' is really for one's own benefit, and should not really be viewed & absorbed by others, and especially labeled as being "fine art".


http://i018.radikal.ru/0902/5d/9dcbd494c12f.jpg

I agree with her that human beings carry both sides of the good/bad spectrum within each & everyone of us. Both sides of that spectrum needs expression, and not to be buried inside, where it can do some damage to one's own self - especially, the dark stuff. Its up to each one of us to find ways that this can be done in a conscious, civilized manner - where it doesn't affect / harm others - and to be more responsible for the health & well-being of our own bodymind mechanisms. That is imo.

[turiya]

Former DOD Contractor Bryan Tew Discusses
Conscious Computers & Mind Control
(Apr 16, 2016)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cIy-QctVPNI/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/cIy-QctVPNI?t=1m44s)

https://youtu.be/cIy-QctVPNI?t=1m17s (https://youtu.be/cIy-QctVPNI?t=1m44s)

Eric Karlstrom Website: Gang Stalking, Mind Control & Cults (http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/author/eric-karlstrom/)

TRANSCRIPTION @ 1min44s by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom (http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/1282-2/)


Moderator: Former employee of DOD in Eastern Europe, Bryan Tew is with us. Today he is going to talk to us about how conscious computers interact with our brainwave activity.

Bryan: My targeting started in about 1997-8. At the time I was in law school with the University of Liverpool in the Cayman Islands. I heard a voice in my head telling me to speak to someone. (This was V2k, or synthetic telepathy). After that, I started experiencing directed energy attacks, panic attacks, etc. So my targeting started twenty years ago. But it could go back to childhood. In fact, when I tried to do a FOIA request, the Birmingham Field Office had been erased from the FOIA. So, there could have been something going on in Alabama prior to me going to Liverpool to go to Law School. I was in the Caymen Islands. I was experiencing panic attacks from directed energy weapons.

Over time I have connected the dots. I now see the pattern. This technology has been around for decades, and it goes back at least to the 1950’s -60’s mind control (the CIA´s MKULTRA) by way of directed energy. Electromagnetic energy interfacing with nano-technology has also been around since the 1960’s and we can’t really say for sure if they were using the same technology that they are using today.

There are millions of victims all around the world. This technology has been around for quite a while. It started with Dr. Jose Delgado, who started this directed energy mind control technology in the 1960’s. This was popularized with his famous bull experiment. The CIA later hired him and other scientists, like Dr. Jacobson out of Norway. Shortly after that in the 1970’s, the project went ¨black¨ (completely covert, or underground). The technology at first was open and many universities were employed and doing research and development in it.

It was only through the exposure of MK ULTRA in the 1970´s that we discovered that this was happening. At that time, there were 100’s of subprojects (149) under MK ULTRA as well as many other mind control projects (MKDelta, MKNaomi, MKOften, etc.), and you can say that if there were hundreds of programs, there were thousands of projects that fell under those programs. Of course, the CIA said that they would stop these programs after being challenged by the US Congress at the Church Committee Senate hearings. They agreed there would be no more non-consensual human mind control experimentation. We now know that that was a lie. Or we wouldn´t be here today doing this show.

This is a global program. Based on my own experience of being stalked, I can tell you it´s happening in Europe, Central America, South America, Cuba, Russia, Spain, Eastern Europe, Scandanavia, the Caribbean Islands. I know because I´ve been to all these countries and I was heavily stalked there. So it´s not just in America. Although the Americans and British (a distant second) are further ahead of most of these other countries.

Four agencies are behind all this program. These are the CIA, DIA, DoD, and NSA.

DoD provides all the money through their black ops budgets, NSA provides the top scientists, and CIA and DIA provide the handlers, the operators, the people involved in the hands-on torture. These CIA/DIA subcontractors are the ones who comprise the ¨hive mind¨ teams of 3 to 6 people. They use private contractors for this. The CIA learned during the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s to outsource these operations. So most of this is carried out by private contractors who are highly trained in the area of the mind, particularly as it relates to memory and thought processes. These are neuroscientists, behavioral scientists, psychologists, and psychiatrists, etc. Many are just intellectual barbarians, I would say.

To monitor and manipulate mind control victims (the targeted individuals), they work 8 hour shifts, and every 8 hours the hive mind teams pass the mind control victim off to another team.

When they first put you in the program, they move people in close to you and they remotely obtain your EEG readout of your brain wave signature, called a digital brainwave imprint. And they upload this digital copy of your brain wave signature into their supercomputer, which is a conscious computer, and you are now connected to this supercomputer for life. How? By using a continuous stream of energy, by electromagnetic low frequency waves that are uniquely tuned to your brain waves. Nobody else on earth has your same brain wave signature. And there is a stream of energy from the conscious computer that is designed to interact with your brainwaves frequencies and patterns.

They get the targeted individuals to ingest nano-technology and this migrates to the brain. (ETK note: This must be dispersed throughout the environment via the global chemtrail aerial spraying program.) This nano-technology adheres to the neuro-transmitters in your brain. That´s how it´s able to speak to and decode the neuro-transmitters in your brain and that´s how they are able to turn the brain of the mind control victim into their very own visual, verbal, and audio communications system. It takes time to accomplish this. But that´s how these computers are designed to operate. These conscious computers are way beyond what people can imagine. These super computers are actually artificial life. They have will, intellect and emotions of their own. Where did they get the will, intellect and emotions? They got these from the millions of targeted individuals that they have targeted over the decades and whose personalities, will, intellect and emotions they copied and downloaded onto their system.

(ETK note: I have not been able to verify if conscious computers exist or not.)

The government is about 80 years ahead of the technology that´s available on the market.
Artificial intelligence is based on ¨ïf and then¨ algorithms. (If this then that)…. But these conscious super computers are way beyond artificial intelligence. Mind control algorithms are not based on ´if and then´ algorithms. These supercomputers are actually artificial life, with a will, intellect and emotions of their own. Mind control technology today that the CIA, DIA and DARPA are using is based on the reverse engineering of the human mind. What happens is that once the CIA, DIA, DARPA hive mind teams move in close to you, next door to you, above you or below you, they obtain an EEG digital brainwave imprint of your brainwave signature, and they download that back to their conscious supercomputer and then they tie you to that supercomputer for life remotely by way of a continuous stream of low frequency electromagnetic energy. And that stream contains a hidden carrier frequency.

Moderator: How is the stream of energy being transmitted?

Tew: They use three methods, they use satellites, towers, and mobile platforms to transmit the signals. But these are just the relay devices. You are actually being attacked by a stream of energy emitted by the conscious supercomputer multiplex, they are the active trigger switch, and it monitors all electromagnetic activity of your brain. It measures and monitors all electromagnetic emissions, the evoked potentials, and downloads all of this at the speed of light. As soon as you think about it, the supercomputer by way of the continuous stream of fabricated, falsified energy can download those thoughts back into its system. So what is happening is the computer multiplex is routing the signals to the towers, satellite or mobile platforms and then the towers, satellites, and mobile platforms relay the signals to the digital receiver. This is similar in many ways to how cell phone technology works- the digital receiver is tracked in real time. Except with mind control technology the digital receiver is not a cell phone, the digital receiver is the human brain.

Your brain has been digitalized by the nano-technology, by the implants, etc. in your body, in your blood sugar, the nano-technology adhering to the neurotransmitters of your brain. The stream of energy that’s routed from the supercomputer to the tower to you contains a hidden carrier frequency. The hidden carrier frequency can interface with the nano-tachnology in your brain and the computer. It´s called the brain-to-computer interface (BCI). There are two different interface technologies used here. There is the brain-to-computer interface and transcranial brain stimulation. The pilot of the F-5 Stealth fighter controls the plane with his mind using Brain-to-computer interface. The stream of energy in this technology is operating through transcranial brain stimulation; it needs to vibrate on the bones of your body.

They are able to inject impulses, memory attacks, verbal entrainment, visual entrainment, two dimensional images, short videos, dream modulation, neuro-linguistic programming through these methods, etc. All of this is dependent on this continuous stream of unbroken electromagnetic energy interfacing with the nano-technology in your mind. That´s the simple explanation of how this technology works. People think they are being attacked by their cell phones, but that´s not how this technology works. Rather, you are being attacked by a supercomputer and the supercomputer uses three things: towers, satellite, and mobile platforms to relay the signals. But the term mobile platforms term is vague. These mobile platforms can be a truck, a ship or boat, a briefcase, a car or van, or a nightstand.

By the way, what I´ve learned, I´ve learned on my own though research. I learned how to research in law school. I´m not a neuroscientist. I have built my understanding based on studying the research of Dr. Robert Duncan, Dr. John Hall, and other experts. There are so many I can´t name them all. People think I´m smart. I´m not smart. I study smart people. We should all be very grateful for the scientists who have shared this information. They should be prayed for. Some of them have been killed. Their consciences could not live with this program.

I´m doing these programs because If you, the TI, don´t have a basic understanding of this technology you´ll be running around in circles until the day of your untimely death. You´ll be chasing the proverbial rabbit down various holes your entire life. That´s why I do these shows.

Moderator: How is the hive mind team… where are they located? How are they able to monitor so many people?

Tew: These supercomputers can make 100,000´s of calculations per second. This whole system is automated. This is the difference between remote neural monitoring and remote neural manipulation.

The leader of the hive mind team is called a clone. And he´s a psychologist, psychiatrist, a neuroscientist, etc… These are CIA and DIA subcontractors. They are doctors hiding in plain sight. They are real people and have careers, families, and mortgages. It´s just that nobody knows the horror they are engaged in daily. And they know better than to ask questions. The team leader, the clone, clones his brainwave signature to your brain wave signature. So this way he can verbally and visually take his thoughts and emotions and clone them to your mind. At each shift change every 8 hours, then the next clone comes on. These are the people involved in the actual hands-on torture.

There are actually more people involved in the CIA/DIA hive mind team. There is the firewall. The firewall is actually a human brain- another individual. It´s not a software or hardware program, although that is involved. This is necessary so that there is no breakdown in the bi-directional link between the clone and the mind control victim. If the firewall breaks down then they have trouble. Because, theoretically, if they are able to read your mind, then you theoretically should be able to read their mind, hear them think out loud, their synthetic telepathy, etc. The same nano-tech in your body is in their body.

So that´s how the hive mind team operates. You will interact with the hive mind team at regular intervals. But they are hiding behind law enforcement. This is an intergovernmental interagency operation that is designed to diffuse the responsibility/culpability if they get caught. There are a lot of personnel involved. You will rarely have contact with the hive mind teams. They are CIA and DIA operatives who are actually contractors who work for private companies. They are the psychologists at the children´s clinic, the professor and neuroscientists at the university, the surgeons at the local hospital, the psychiatrists at the hospital. They are hiding in plain sight every day.

These hive mind teams are dedicated to you, the mind control victim, and each takes an 8 hour shift, and then they will move other people around to harass and attack and target you, the mind control victim, to constantly try to provoke the victim into emotional responses that can be remotely measured and integrated back into the supercomputer´s data.

Moderator: What is the purpose of these harassments? Why the organized stalking?

Tew: They are using trauma, physical and psychological trauma, to map out the sensory and neural pathways of your brain and central nervous system. They need to inflict trauma regularly to do that. Long term physical and brutal psychological trauma is necessary in order to force the victim to disassociate from reality. And also to map out your brain. They are breaking down your brain to the synaptic level. You have millions of neurons in your brain that communicate with each other through what´s called a ¨synaptic gap.¨ The neurotransmitter is there and the nano-technology adheres to the neurotransmitters and that´s how the technology is designed to speak to and decode thoughts.

Organized stalking is part of the paradigm to inflict trauma. There are many different reasons they use organized stalking. They use it for surveillance, to provoke the victim, to keep the victim from defeating the technology. But the main reason is to discredit the mind control victim so that no one will believe that your targeting is occurring. Try having a rational conversation with a police officer when you tell him that hundreds of strangers are following you. So they want to discredit the mind control victim. And then to provoke the victim into psychological trauma, fear, paranoia, etc., in order to map out the mind and nervous system, to create electronic emissions, to create emotional responses, which they can remotely measure and then integrate into their R and M data. They will constantly get in your face. But it´s more than that. They are looking for evoked potentials. They may come up to you with the most mundane questions imaginable. They may ask you what time it is. Or ¨Can you give me directions to such and such a place?¨ …. Or ¨How much did you pay for that?¨ They are seeking to solicit a response.

Once they have enough responses then they correlate all these responses into what they call response statistics. They are trying to create coherent patterns of thought and then they can begin to map out the brain of the mind control victim. In order to do that, they use trauma.

Understand that these organized stalkers are not dedicated to you, the targeted individual, per se. They are dedicated to all the targeted individuals, the victims, who live and move through their area of operation. There is a great deal of indirection for plausible deniability involved. Then they can say to the police, I just live here, this person is paranoid, is crazy.

Moderator: What can you tell us about the V2K? Is that coming from the conscious computers as well?

Tew: V2K is just one part- if there were 149 programs in MKULTRA, how many do you think they have now? There must be 500 to a thousand programs and tens of thousands of projects. There is a difference between state-of-the-art mind control, which is based on the ignorance of the victim, and trauma-based mind control, which is based on long term physical and psychological trauma on the victim. V2K is part of trauma-based mind control. But the program is much bigger than V2K.

In state-of-the-art mind control, the individual does not know he´s being targeted. It´s much easier to control the victim with this. The technology is designed to mimic your normal cognitive behavior. Trauma-based mind control is just brute force hacking.

Organized stalking is based on ¨choice reference patterns¨… They are using the pattern of your previous choices. Based on your previous choices, they will have organized stalkers pre-placed. Then they engage in situational scenarios and conversational scenarios; these are street theatre. They always use events or topics they know will capture your attention. They have to gauge whether the technology is working effectively or not. They need to isolate the individual. The purpose is to force you into isolation… They do this by creating a hostile environment everywhere the TI goes. I don´t care how stable and rational the person is, everyone has a breaking point. These scenarios are designed to provoke you through trigger stimuli. They need to capture your attention. They must capture the targets attention. If you put ear phones in your ears, they will then start waving wildly. They will act crazy as hell to do it.

Moderator: That makes sense to me, because I´m good at ignoring them, but they are getting more violent to force me to react. I´m getting more physical assaults now. I´m thinking this is because I don´t react as much as they would like.

Tew: They are going to force you to react. They use the hyper game theory… they use this to force you into a series of endless countermeasures, or countermoves in order to survive. Sometimes you can choose not to play the game. At other times, you will have to play the game or perish. These situational and conversational scenarios will become violent. I´ve been put in the hospital. They are all based on events or topics that they know will capture your attention. If they can´t do it verbally, they will do it physically. Because each response is downloaded at the speed of light back into the conscious computer and interacts with the victim.

This called the ¨interjection information feedback.¨ The point that you actually do something, when you lash out in violence, etc., is an important metric in their technology for them. They need to map these turning points. Organized stalking is actually crucial to trauma-based mind control… This is how they gauge what is effective and what is not effective.

Moderator: When TIs go in to get MRIs at hospitals, do they use these MRIs to record our brain wave patterns?

Tew: Yes, the computer is constantly recording everything. You are tied to a supercomputer. It records all electromagnetic images of your brain until the day of your untimely death. It takes them time… Being able to see through the victims eyes, hear through the victims ears, feel what the victim feels, sense what the victim senses, they have to record all activities 24 hours a day. Unless you are able to break the stream. They need to prevent that.

If you listen to music, go singing and dancing, and engage in outdoor activities, these activities interfere with their program. They need to minimize all external interference. This is how they build a cognitive model. Stay out of the hospital. If you go in to a mental hospital you are being put right in the hands of the clones of the hive mind team. They have isolated you. This is just what they need to happen. These are thought-triggered attacks. Remote neural monitoring is absolutely essential for ¨thought triggered attacks¨ to happen. They happen at the speed of light and are based on ¨memory attacks.¨

All mind control technology is based on:

1) censorship which is designed to sensor your activities. To prevent you from engaging in external activities that interfere with their neuro-programming. This is designed to restrict you at will.

2) memory management- they block your real memories and then inject falsified memories (which they have been able to plant in your mind) and fabricated memories (which are real memories that you previously had recorded and they are re-injected them back into your mind.)

3) direct behavioral control

You can defeat mind control, and these thought-triggered attacks, by learning to read active memory.

Moderator Question: If we just stay in our houses and lay in bed and try to meditate and clear our minds of thought, will this help us? Will they get bored with us and leave us alone then?

Tew: No, isolation is just what they want you to do. You are just playing into their hands. They want to minimize all external interference. They want to force you back into your home by creating a hostile environment. No living organism can survive in an environment that is constantly hostile. The neural programming is more effective if you are isolated. So organized stalking is absolutely crucial for them.

Moderator: Why are people put into these programs?

Tew: Targeted individuals are chosen because they fall into one of four categories. Then they are actually participating and helping with the training, research and development of this technology. These four categories are:

1) Judicial targets, i.e., people with criminal records
2) Extra-judicial targets, which includes activists, whistleblowers, etc.
3) Targets of opportunity, people randomly targeted for research purposes
4) Lucrative targets, people who possess sensitive information, or sensitive positions

Moderator Question: I fell deeply in love with a man. Then the man withdrew without explanation. Can you explain why they would do that?

Tew: They use honey traps, relationships, in order to provoke the victim into responses. This is about your will, intellect and
emotions. That´s your soul. They know how to manipulate your feelings. But this is more than that. This is what the hyper game theory is about.

They´ll have someone come into your life, the honey trap, they will be the mechanism they use to measure their technology. They will use good cop/bad cop set-ups. They want to instill feelings of hope and then suddenly tear them down with trauma. Bio-communications, influence mapping, and negative associative conditioning, targeting the people in your life, these are all used so that those that are important in your life associate you with negative feelings, etc. Eventually, the person that likes you starts to correlate you to those negative events. Influence mapping is a business marketing strategy; it´s called a business-to-business relationship. They want to find the people in the other company who have the most influence. Similarly, they map out the social circle you live in, then they target those people that are most important to you in your life so that those people will become your enemy. They use negative associative conditioning to turn those people away from you.

Moderator Question: How do I defeat the trauma?

Tew: There are several ways.

1) Multi-tasking, thinking in multiple threads, then there´s no coherent pattern for them to download.
2) Listening to music, dancing, etc. disrupts their access to your brain.
3) Being spontaneous. Spontanaeity! This breaks their patterns and disrupts their system. Not planning at all. Then they have to start all over again. They have to start a new scenario. I´m talking about the speed of light actions in your life, you pull into the grocery store with no previous thoughts that you were going to do that. They have to predict your choices. They use thought-triggered attacks. And they have to verify it. They need to predict where you are going in advance, what you are going to eat, etc.

So they initiate these situational scenarios. The supercomputer is probing you for a response. They give you a strong desire to do something…. They initiate these situational and conversational scenarios to pit you into an action-access-sequence and then they target you at incrementally higher levels. These scenarios involve your families and your friends.

4) Redirection. When you realize you are under neural attack, redirect your thoughts to something that is very pleasant for you. I think of Jesus.

5) Having a basic understanding of how the technology works. And understanding that they are going to present trauma to you on a daily basis. Because trauma is essential for them to map out your system.

You need you to respond to their specific stimuli…. Or the verification process breaks apart. It doesn´t really matter to them how or if you respond to something else. Without verification to their stimuli there is no mind control… it can´t exist. So they need you to keep you under 24 hour physical surveillance.

6) Learn to read active memory, which is really short term memory. Anything less than 30 seconds. This targeting is designed to target your short term memory. To make it simple, there´s long and short term memory. Mind control is based on attacking you as you are formulating your thoughts; these are thought-triggered attacks. So you begin to maintain situational awareness of your mind, your thoughts, where you are, etc. It´s all based on their ability to single out coherent patterns of thought. So identify what are your real, true thoughts, and what might be injected. For example, they want to create lust. They might follow that with a memory inject.

Moderator Question: Where does Christianity come into the mix? What does this have to do with Christians? Can the program recognize Christians? Can they see that it´s harder to attack Christians.

Tew: They target your belief system. They do this is by determining your religion and building a profile. The remote neural attacks are designed to mimic these belief systems. This happened in 1991, when tens of thousands of Iraqi soldiers dismantled their weapons and then surrendered because ¨Allah told us to.¨

They either want to subdue or radicalize your belief system. They like to do the most difficult thing- They can mimic the religious figures with holograms. They want to see what you, the targeted individual, can maintain as being true. No, the program can´t automatically recognize Christians.

They program your behavior and your patterns. Then they can maybe conclude you are Christian. Dr. Robert Duncan says that the doctrines of the faith actually help Christian TIs. Dr. Robert Duncan says that, unlike other religions, Christians do have some defenses…. Due to the doctrines of the faith. Christians will tell you this is the Holy Spirit. Duncan is not a Christian. If they can´t make sense of what they see on the screen, they have to revert back to your past activity. They want you to become dependent on the artificial thought injections. They want you to believe that these are your thoughts…. As your desire gets stronger…. They want you to become dependent on their impulse injections. R and M system is remote neural monitoring and remote neural manipulation.

They target your belief system, and when you become dependent on the R,N, M system, they want to subdue and/or radicalize you. They´ll fabricate voices of God. (Is this Manchurian channeling?).

Moderator : I get attacked spiritually attacked in my sleep, it´s like sleep harassment, it feels like demonic attack. Can the computers do that?

Tew: Yes, the computer uses the Remote Neural monitoring system. This is designed to capture your thoughts and then re-inject more thoughts back into your mind.

Remember, mind control is about:

1) Censorship: restricting your choices of behavior, etc.
2) Control of memory, by injecting false memories
3) Direct behavioral control

Moderator Question: Many TIs, such as myself, believe that they were put into the program at birth.

Tew: Yes. So in your case, you were a target of opportunity.

Moderator : Also, people feel that there are genetic links…. Relatives and family members are targeted. And multi-generations.

Tew: They are targeting your faith based on scripts. (Dr. Duncan calls them scripts, I call them street theatre). They want to traumatize you so that you can no longer function in society. You start to shut down physically and psychologically. They need a large pool of people to do the research on. This is neuro-warfare. This is a weapons system. What´s going on in Arab Spring, Ukraine, Belarus, all these countries that are allied with Russia? This weapons system is being deployed. This is really neuro-warfare between the Russians and the Americans.

This works the opposite of Clockwork Orange…. The theme of movie was to take a violent person and turn them into a peaceful person. In this program, it´s the reverse. Trauma-based mind control is designed to turn the individual into a weapon, who will self-destruct or destroy others in their community. They take a good person and turn you into a bad person. They take a bad person and turn them into an evil person.

So they isolate you from the people that are important to you. They can´t isolate you from everyone but they can isolate you from the people who are important to you… So they create trouble for them every time you come around. So they are targeting your family to isolate the mind control victim.

The CIA and DIA do use haunted houses and demon possession. It is to determine what people will maintain is true…. They can use tele-kinesics, they can move furniture around. All this is done to isolate you. To cause you to physically and psychologically shut down and not be able to function and shut down.

Question by Kimbrick Hunter: With this technology, why can some people feel and see this technology and others can't?

Tew: Good question. This is one of the differences between state-of-the-art mind control and trauma-based mind control, this can be used at low and higher intensities, namely torture. Trauma-based mind control is about brute force mind hacking to get you, the TI, to shut down. They need to use extreme trauma and pain. Automatically, your brain protects itself by disassociating. By the time you are 6 or 7 your core personality is set, is complete. What they need to do is to force you to disassociate from reality, so they use extreme trauma to get you to dissociate and fragment. This is how they create artificially induced multiple personality disorder. But that´s not always necessary, depending on which program they have placed you in.

Monarch programming victims get this extreme torture treatment. Mind control can also be achieved at lower intensities. The higher intensities include torture, suicide programming, cat programming, giving people an insatiable lust….

Hunter: Is this program designed to murder people? I became a target in 2009. I noticed that the people I was close to were playing people against each other. Does this technology affect Christian believers more or less than non-believers? Around 2010, I started getting physical trauma. It didn´t really work. I´m not a violent person. This made me closer to God. But my question is: is this program designed to murder people because they are not controllable.

Tew: Yes. This is a weapons system. The ways they do it is ¨slow kill¨ and ¨quick kill.¨ One of the slow kill programs they have is SATAN…. Silent Assassination, etc.… This is a weapons system based on neuro warfare. They do use people to create heart attacks and strokes. The point at which the TI/mind control victim experiences heart problems is an important metric in their technology. So they determine how to kill people slowly. There are other ways to do it. Suicide programming can amplify whatever destructive habits you have: if you smoke, they make you smoke more, if you eat they make you eat more, if you drink they make you drink more; whatever bad habits you have they amplify with this technology and use that as a weapon against you.

Moderator : I do believe a Christian's faith does help us, we know how to go to God in prayer, and thus, I believe that this program is not as effective on Christians.

Tew: If you are demon-possessed, the hand of God can exorcise it out of you. But scientists say that there´s no way to get this program out of you- or to exorcise it, so to speak. This is bio-communications warfare, involving synthetic telepathy. They do target the cortex of your brain at higher frequencies to try to subdue or radicalize your faith. People who are born again and who have a good understanding of the doctrines of the faith do have some protection… It´s harder for them to turn a good person into a bad person.

Let´s talk about how they monitor you and capture your memories. Remote neural monitoring…. They are monitoring your thoughts and capturing your memories…. Then they move from remote neural monitoring to remote neural manipulation…. It´s all based on patterns.

It´s based on their ability to interpret your thoughts as you are thinking them. That´s called thought composition. They target you during thought composition. They are trying to influence your reference choices. Active memory is based on reference choices. They have to predict what you are going to do during thought composition. So they are mapping patterns. They are using impulses and identifiers to map those patterns, your habits of thinking and acting. It´s all about being able to predict your habits, how you think or act. They are targeting you during thought composition. They use patterns as identifiers. Based on your previous choices, they use this to manipulate your patterns. They are trying influence your ¨Choice reference patterns.¨ They have to predict that. So they are mapping patterns. It´s all about mapping your habits, to predict how you think or act. They use patterns as identifiers…. They are using impulse sequencing, multiple impulse injections, not just one. Using your previous choices.

The technology is designed to fool you. They are trying manipulate your thought composition and habits. If you are not cooperating and they can´t make sense of what they are seeing on the screen, then they have to revert back to you past activities. They map patterns of your previous choices. They are using your old memories against you. And they insert false memories as well. It´s easier to fool people, they inject your memories, they are using artificial memory attacks. They are using your old memories against you. And they are using false memories as well. These are artificial memory attacks. A constant injection of an artificial memory should be a red flag for you.

They´ll engage in these situational and conversational scenarios, to see if you are responding to the neuro programming. They have to first get you to respond to get their program to work…. It´s all response statistics. That´s why they are always provoking you. They may ask mundane questions to you. They absolutely have to have you respond. Their technology depends on taking your responses and putting them into R and M data. And they can´t do that if they can´t make sense of single coherent patterns that they see on their screen.

Moderator Question: Is it possible to get this black op technology to shut down?

Tew: Under the present scenario, No. For any government to admit to this level of assassination of its own citizens, it would fall immediately, so they will kill whoever threatens to bring this out.

I can´t tell you about CIA, but there is a level of fear in the DoD and DIA, they know what will happen to them and to their families if they expose this. This has been going on since the 1970´s. Was anyone ever compensated for MKULTRA abuses? (ETK note: Yes, about 10 Canadians each received close to a million dollars from a class action suit against the Canadian government and the CIA which exposed some of this.) Was anyone ever brought to justice for their role in this? It would take a credible whistleblower with credible, hard data and they would kill him.

In order to stop this, you have to educate the people. There´s a great deal of fear in the CIA…. Under the present scenario, Jesus is the only one that can help you now. Under the present scenario, it´s not going to stop.

Moderator Question: Imagine all the law suits you´d have.

Tew: The courts and the Congress don´t have the expertise to rule on this. The government engages in disinformation. Disinformation is lies and misinformation is half-truths. Also, they engage in blocking and misdirection attacks. The government really hates the internet because they can´t control it. It´s too decentralized. They control the mainstream media. There´s no freedom of the press. But they can´t control alternative media on the internet. So they flood the internet with disinformation and misinformation, to drown out the truth and confuse things. So people are forced to go back to mainstream media, where information is more easy to manipulate. They target these talk show forums heavily.

Moderator Question: On the topic of hope, people didn´t tune in to this program to hear there is no hope. Christ said he is the hope. And the government is the people that we elected into office. And yet these are the same people that come under the influence of satanic entities to write into law and to allow these types of programs to get out of hand. Is there some way to defeat the neural links to the main computers, since they are using our brains as computers like a wifi link, is there some way to defeat this system that we people can begin to use… to bring down this system….

Tew: Yes, there are things you can do to defeat the technology…. There are four main methods of shielding from this technology… things you can do?….

1) Passive shielding, almost totally ineffective against an active adaptive system such as run by these conscious computers. Metal, Teflon, faraday cages, have some limited effects at certain frequencies. But the system can immediately adapt to these. Using the Hyper Game theory.

2) Mental shielding- is the best way to do this!…. Mental shielding: think in multiple threads, multi-task, for example, watching television and cooking at the same time. This creates multiple threads of thoughts and this causes multiple images on their screens and their verification process breaks apart. Listening to music is very effective, in fact, the best shield I´ve discovered. It has to be dominant… the brain will align itself with a dominant external stimulus. Indeed, that´s what they are doing to you. When something else becomes the dominant external stimulus, they can´t entrain your brain. So watch movies and listen to music, whistle while you work, it breaks brain entrainment… it creates all this additional energy. The clone and supercomputer can´t make sense of what they sees on the screen. This is jamming the information feedback loop. Spontaneity works too….
They are reading your mind 24 hours a day. So when you create multiple patterns on their screen. They can´t can do their integration, completion, verification. Now there is no coherent pattern on their screen. Listening to pleasing music is the best shield I´ve discovered. It is a dominant external stimuli. The brain aligns itself with a dominant external signal, it’s called brain entrainment. Then your brain is entrained away from their system and their mind control fails. Listening to pleasing music also lights up many electromagnetic energy in your brain which effectively jams their system.

3) Chemical shielding, medicine to help you relax, such as valium. But these medications are often highly addictive.

4) Electronic jamming. But this is very expensive and its difficult to isolate the signal…. The equipment would cost a fortune. And that signal is adaptive, it´s an active system. You are dealing with passive materials trying to stop an active system.
Moderator: I want to agree with the questioner. God is the only hope. God is in control of all things. We have hope in God and this keeps us fighting until the day we die. And I find meditation helps tremendously. I also sing all the time.

Tew: I´m not saying there´s no hope. I´m saying that under the present scenario, the government is not going to help you. Yes, Jesus is the main hope and if you don´t know Jesus you have a bigger problem than mind control.

But remember, they have to establish patterns of previous thoughts in order to predict your choices. Every day this computer is predicting your choices. The system is all automated. If you just happen to spontaneously go to the grocery store…. They can´t deal with that pattern. If you go to the store at the same time every day, they will have people pre-placed all over the store to get you to respond to their situational/conversational scenarios in order to confirm that their system is working. They are there to get hard data, to develop patterns.

Addendum To Interview: Tew’s Clarifying Email Communique to Dr. Eric Karlstrom

Dr Karlstrom,

I listened to your interview on the Kev Baker Show regarding the 3.5 hour video I made with a woman named Renata. The audio is bad at times So I needed to clarify something.

Cars, vans, trucks, boats, planes ships, etc., are all used for the purposes of the Mobile Platforms and segments of entire urban populations can be targeted simultaneously with these Mobile Platforms but while those are the instruments and mechanisms they utilize, none of those things are the actual Mobile Platforms.

The Mobile Platform is a NEURO-CHIP in the body or gear (e.g: Clones) of the Hive Mind Team members. It is about the size of a grain of sand and is called the ‘Electronic Brain to Brain Interface’. They are not using screens, monitors, etc., as that is ‘old hat’ technology to them. They are using a Virtual Interface only they can physically see. Think of a highly sophisticated Virtual Reality headset which creates a virtual environment, but the Hive Mind Teams don’t need the headset.

They are using an eye gaze tracker instead of a mouse. They interface with the RNM Supercomputer (Brain to Computer Interface) to attack the victim when they wish to manually inject during each phase of EEG Heterodyning. The Clones’ thoughts are the active triggering sequence which the RNM System (Conscious Computer) responds to as it locks on to your emotional state.

They pull up multiple virtual screens at a time. For example, the first screen is the brain wave patterns of the mind control victim. The second parallel screen is the brain wave patterns of the Clone Member of the Hive Mind Teams. The third drop down screen is a mixture (EEG Heterodyning) of both the victims’ brain wave signature and that of the Clone Member, etc. Depending on their objectives additional screens can be opened and closed as needed but those screens are invisible to anyone who does not possess the Electronic Brain to Brain Interface (Neuro-Chip).

The Hive Mind Teams are not sitting in some laboratory or office somewhere. They are out in the field constantly attempting to interact with you at regular intervals, such as for the purposes of verification of their technology etc. They are sitting next to you on the plane; the new employee sitting near you at the office, the new pastor at the church, etc. THE Hive Mind Teams don’t have to be near or next to you to attack you, but these are some examples which may help you understand what they are doing and how they use the Mobile Platforms.

(Also) The moment you are selected as a test subject for Mind Control technologies all the available apartments, homes, offices, hotel rooms, etc., near and next to your residence are sublet and the Hive Mind Teams, Surveillance Teams, Organized Stalkers, etc., move in and training research and development begins. Placing a person inside a Psychotronic Concentration Camp is no small operation so a lot of people are involved. Sometimes the sheer magnitude of the operation can overwhelm new victims.

The Clone Members of each team clone their brainwave signatures to the victims’ brain wave signature and engage in remote neural manipulation at regular intervals. The RNM System does the rest.

The Hive Mind Teams can be easily manipulated using bait and switch tactics with your thoughts.

In other words, you learn to read active memory and correlate the patterns (e.g beautiful women, etc.) to whatever stimuli they are using against you and create a false pattern and then break it. I do this with them a lot and find it very satisfying. Worked well this weekend.

I keep telling them to use voluptuous beautiful red heads against me, but they never listen.

UNDER HEAVY ATTACK RIGHT NOW AS I TRY AND TYPE THIS EMAIL TO YOU. BODY TEMPERATURE AND HEART RATE INCREASING RAPIDLY.

I EXPECT POSSIBLE INTERFERENCE WITH THE TRANSMISSION OF THIS EMAIL AS HAPPENED MANY TIMES IN THE PAST.

Kind Regards

Bryan Tew
More at the link:
Source (http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/1282-2/)

[turiya]

Synthetic Telepathy.... Solaris BlueRaven


Solaris BlueRaven MK Ultra video 2006
(Dec 27, 2012)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4NU0PrYA6U&t=173s_______________________

BrainScratch: Synthetic Telepathy
and Solaris BlueRaven
(Sep 11, 2015)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mkz7oK-Puoo

[Foxie Loxie]

After listening to Bryan Tew for an hour I can see why Bill moved to Ecuador!! :bigsmile: It is difficult to wrap one's mind around all this....I remember one lady who had to sleep in a bathtub to get some relief! Glad there is some help for these targeted individuals.

[turiya]

After listening to Bryan Tew for an hour I can see why Bill moved to Ecuador!! :bigsmile: It is difficult to wrap one's mind around all this....I remember one lady who had to sleep in a bathtub to get some relief! Glad there is some help for these targeted individuals.

Yeah... I remember hearing that bathub comment from somewhere...It goes to the very heart of the dark deep-state! New technology has always attracted the hidden hands (more like claws) of the military-industrial-complex to use it in whatever nefarious ways that they can think of... Scientists seem to be co-opted... whether they want to be, or not... really not their choice to make...

Solaris BlueRaven has had quite a time with maintaining her sanity with this stuff...


Bases 22 Solaris BlueRaven
Synthetic Telepathy Part One
(Feb 16, 2013)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tB6GNxk1_g8/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/YPF-jVTGEw4)

https://youtu.be/YPF-jVTGEw4 (https://youtu.be/YPF-jVTGEw4)[/video]

__________________________

Bases 22 Solaris BlueRaven
Synthetic Telepathy Part Two
(Feb 16, 2013)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0IkcxSrjv0

[turiya]

________________________________

https://www.curezone.org/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/AVALON/TRUMP/WIKILEAKS_TWE/WIKILEAKS_TWITTER_ICON.png (https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/874263602156490752)

Assange: Humanity is doomed once the
media is run by artificial intelligence
https://www.facebook.com/wikileaks/videos…

6:54 AM - 12 Jun 2017
________________________________


EXISTENTIAL THREATS (https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/01/16/existential-threats/)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DTtKh84X4AEkC0j.jpg:large (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/julian-assange-says-google-facebook-have-become-existential-threat-humanity-1655515)

-- Julian Assange


Julian Assange speaks about
AI controlled Facebook propaganda
(Jun 17, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZTJ_fZyioA

TRANSCRIPTION begins @ ~ 11m00s

Julian Assange: What I think is the most important development that is happening as far as the fate of human beings is concerned, is that we are getting to the threshold where the traditional propaganda function that is employed by, you know... the BBC, Daily Mail, etc., ect., cultures also... is, or can be, encapsulated by AI processes.

Now, if you think about where you're playing chess, already we're in a situation where AI can do better than a human chess player. So you can see a certain number of moves ahead. And, someone moves a piece on the board, and you go, "Why did they put that knight there?" And you start to think, "Well, what is the intentionality behind it?" And then you try to look several moves ahead to work out what the intentionality was & then counter it.

"Okay, they want to manipulate me into moving here, so this will happen, and so I will lose."

But actually, some of us take in these considerations already when we're reading stories in the press:

"What is the intentionality of this story?"
"Why is this particular information being pushed to the public, and not some other form of audience?"
"Who's the name of the author?"
"What publication is it appearing in?"
"What language?"

Well, possibly the reason was because someone wanted to promote a particular agenda. Therefore, we should read it in a different light.

When you have Artificial Intelligence programs, harvesting all the search queries that people have on their phones, all the youtube videos that human beings uploaded, etc. And it starts to lay out perceptual influence campaigns - 20 to 30 moves ahead - this starts to become totally beneath the level of human perception.

Once a computer augmented organization, such as Google, is able to engage in influencing human beings 20 to 30 moves ahead, keeping each move beneath the level of human perception, then there's nothing we can do about it. Because we can't see it.

So, if you can imagine how this will play out in practice... Let's say, Google wants to acquire some company in Russia, China or U.K.... and it wants to pay as low a price as possible to gain control over that company.

Well, who are the people that decide to sell shares? Or, who are the regulatory administrators who will regulate how it is sold? Who are the people who work in it who ultimately control it? Or, the computer systems that power it & control parts?

So, you can start to engage in a campaign of acquisition laid out to make each step beneath the level of human perception, and look many moves ahead... And if you can do that more than others can do it, then you win. Just like in chess.

That's where I think we are going in term of politics.

If you look at that kind of prediction of the future, we're all doomed from that viewpoint. Because reality becomes invisible. Reality becomes something that is unperceivable by us individuals. Now to a degree, of course, it already is in many ways unperceivable. But, the big changes about control - those become totally unperceivable.

So, is there any antidote to that? ...mmm... Maybe.

In the competition between these organizations, you might, maybe, have companies in China trying to do the same thing - backed also by the state - so there's a little bit of fratricide, if you like, between these two.

But the most immediate way of generating capital is to sell access to it. Just like Google sell access to Google Search - How do they sell it? Well, you sell yourself. What you do, is you sell what you wanted to search, and you sell your attention to Google by searching.

That's "Surveillance Capitalism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism)" - you give a little bit of your insight into who you are to Google - by searching - and in exchange, for all the resources it has & its capacities that you can use to get the result.

So if Google has a rather very serious increase in AI capacity, it can lease that AI capacity to other organizations to get knowledge about those other organizations, in terms of surveillance capital flows, or just for money. Its a way of getting profit fast for Google.

Then, the question becomes: What are the various end-states?

In that dynamic of acquistion of capital - exchange of intelligence capacity - who ends up winning? You end up with, basically, a diversification - like is done, to a degree, with Google Search, whereby every individual that has access to it is, effectively, ends up with the ability that the State Department once had. So, you have access to enormous archives, mostly laterally produced around the world.

Or, we move toward a situation where Google, or an equivalent organization, is able to acquire so much more, in terms of capital flows, in terms of knowledge about how organizations are working by collecting what they want to do with this AI capacity.

Then you can end up with very, very substantial - very, very powerful organizations - that are operating at a level beneath what human beings can perceive. And ultimately, move into a situation where what human beings are interested in becomes totally irrelevant. Because you'll have computer organizations & manufacturing processes & automated transport flows, etc.,
which make human being inefficient & irrelevant. Its not like you have some nasty Artificial Intelligence that wants to decimate the world, but rather human beings become irrelevant - treated like we treat animals. Like, irritating animals like moles, for example, that are getting in the way our ability to use land for something else.

Maybe there will be a new band of technologically empowered human beings that can see this 'brewing fate' that is coming towards us that will be able to extract value from it, or diminish it, by directly engaging with this, is also possible.

____________________

Julian Assange says Google and Facebook
have become an 'existential threat to humanity' (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/julian-assange-says-google-facebook-have-become-existential-threat-humanity-1655515)
By Jason Murdock
Updated January 17, 2018 19:29 GMT

http://alwatannews.net/uploads/images/2017/05/19/1065488.jpg

[turiya]

.
Assange Keeps Warning Of A.I. Censorship, And It's Time We Started Listening (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-21/assange-keeps-warning-ai-censorship-and-its-time-we-started-listening)

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_small/public/2018-01/20180121_assange1.jpg?itok=xto-2P6X (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-21/assange-keeps-warning-ai-censorship-and-its-time-we-started-listening)

"...increasingly more advanced forms of artificial intelligence... can hide information which goes against the interests of those power structures and elevate narratives which support those interests, all of course while maintaining the illusion of freedom and lively debate..."


Jan 22, 2018 5:00 AM

[turiya]

SGT Sean interviews Kent Lewiss...

"Sure crypto currencies may be decentralized, but the blockchains are centralized... which makes the notion of decentralized cryptocurrencies irrelevant... its all a part of Agenda 21... "


BILDERBERG BLOCKCHAIN?
(Jan 20, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltKLOJp08Uw



Description:

Would you be shocked to learn that the Bilderberg Group is moving behind the scenes to exercise control over Bitcoin and ultimately blockchain? Kent Lewiss is the founder of freedom.social and the 1776 token and he says, "The bankers don't want to destroy Bitcoin, they want to control it."

[turiya]

Koniku Kore
(Sep 17, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlS4fFDkUo0



Description:

Koniku is an early stage, 1.5 yrs old profitable startup, based in the East Bay, Northern California. Koniku is the world’s first wetware company. Our premise is as simple as its radical: “the merger of synthetic neurobiology and silicon technology into a coherent, sturdy and elegant device which solves urgent real-world problems anywhere — in the lab, industry, and on a street corner”. Our maxim is: “Bio is Tech”. In fact, we believe: “any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from nature.”
__________________________

TEDGlobal: The computer that can smell explosives (http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40935771)
By Jane Wakefield
Technology reporter, TEDGlobal Tanzania
28 August 2017


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-kHYLMDP6c

Oshi Agabi envisages airports that will need no visible security system allowing people to just walk on to planes

Nigerian Oshi Agabi has unveiled a computer based not on silicon but on mice neurons at the TEDGlobal conference in Tanzania.

The system has been trained to recognise the smell of explosives and could be used to replace traditional airport security, he said.

Eventually the modem-sized device - dubbed Koniku Kore - could provide the brain for future robots.

Experts said that making such systems mass-market was challenging.

All of the big tech firms, from Google to Microsoft, are rushing to create artificial intelligence modelled on the human brain.

While computers are better than humans at complex mathematical equations, there are many cognitive functions where the brain is much better: training a computer to recognise smells would require colossal amounts of computational power and energy, for example.

Mr Agabi is attempting to reverse-engineer biology, which already accomplishes this function with a fraction of the power it would take a silicon-based processor. "Biology is technology. Bio is tech," he says. "Our deep learning networks are all copying the brain."

He launched his start-up Koniku over a year ago, has raised $1m (£800,000) in funding and claims it is already making profits of $10m in deals with the security industry.

Koniku Kore is an amalgam of living neurons and silicon, with olfactory capabilities — basically sensors that can detect and recognise smells.

"You can give the neurons instructions about what to do - in our case we tell it to provide a receptor that can detect explosives."

He envisages a future where such devices can be discreetly used at various points in airports, eliminating the need for queues to get through airport security.

As well as being used for bomb detection, the device could be used to detect illness by sensing markers of a disease in the air molecules that a patient gives off.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/28/14/43A4FB5B00000578-0-image-a-6_1503926127906.jpg

Oshiorenoya Agabi wants to create a brain-based computer system The prototype device shown off at TED - the pictures of which cannot yet be publicly revealed - has partially solved one of the biggest challenges of harnessing biological systems - keeping the neurons alive, said Mr Agabi.

In a video, he showed the device being taken out of the lab.

"This device can live on a desk and we can keep them alive for a couple of months," he told the BBC.


Human-pig 'chimera embryos' detailed (http://www.bbc.com/news/health-38717930)
Colourful, creative and close up: Wellcome Images 2017 (http://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-39272111)

Ultimately though he has much bigger ambitions.
"We think that the processing power that is going to run the robots of the future will be synthetic biology-based and we are laying the foundations for that today."

The fusion of biology and technology gained headlines recently when Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla and Space X, announced his latest venture - Neuralink - which aims to fuse the human brain with AI (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-39416231), using neural lace.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/14487/production/_97397038_neurons.gif

Much of AI research is focused on mimicking the job of neurons Advances in neuroscience, bioengineering and computer science means that much more is known about how the human brain works than ever before.

This is fuelling the development of neuro-technology - devices that aim to mould the brain into computers.

Much of the current work is aimed at improving brain function, particularly for those with brain-related injuries or diseases.

Prof John Donoghue, who heads up the Wyss Centre for bio and neuro-engineering in Geneva, has been at the forefront of work attempting to allow people with paralysis to move limbs using their brain waves.

He believes the field is at a "tipping point" where biological and digital systems will come together.

The idea being pursued by Mr Agabi is interesting, he said.
"Digital computers are fast and reliable but dumb, whereas neurons are slow but smart," he said.

"But they are not so good in a little dish and the big problem will be keeping them alive and happy. That is going to be a big challenge," he added.

"Will we have a dish of neurons computing on our desk? I don't know."

But he added that scientists in Geneva were already able to "keep neurons in a dish and communicate with them for a year", adding that such systems were an "exciting tool to study brain circuitry".

Other scientists are developing silicon chips which mimic the way that neurons work and could ultimately prove more stable, he said.

But Mr Agabi is not convinced such systems will win out over his.
"The idea of mimicking silicon is very hard and we don't think it can be scaled," he told the BBC.

SOURCE (http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40935771)

[Bo Atkinson]

I spend my time fixing little recycled devices in my Robinson Crusoe life style, earned through 5 decades, of chasing the carrot and salvaging odd scraps of building material along the edges of a gentrified rurality.

I always love advancing tech, up until the deification of ego blurts out. The message of technocracy in this vid, (Ray Kurzweil - The Singularity Is Near), seems to conclude something like this: “We could infuse the universe with our intelligence rather quickly…. Saturate the universe with Computronium.”

The movie heroine is a female robot, winning citizenship at law. Hoping to rally in the streets and parks. The props and scripts are all so sterile and cosmetically polished. The lure of better living seems implied. The answer for all ages is suggested. Is it nano chips in the blood streams, or microwaved programs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5jiGeQBLTk

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Was Hollywood hired to film a better version?
A bright new blogger poses: “Trickery of 2018”?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwAeVXOyt5c&feature=share
Human Immortality Revealed PSYCHASEC Carbon Human Sleeve Test Leak

[turiya]

I spend my time fixing little recycled devices in my Robinson Crusoe life style, earned through 5 decades, of chasing the carrot and salvaging odd scraps of building material along the edges of a gentrified rurality.

I always love advancing tech, up until the deification of ego blurts out. The message of technocracy in this vid, (Ray Kurzweil - The Singularity Is Near), seems to conclude something like this: “We could infuse the universe with our intelligence rather quickly…. Saturate the universe with Computronium.”

The movie heroine is a female robot, winning citizenship at law. Hoping to rally in the streets and parks. The props and scripts are all so sterile and cosmetically polished. The lure of better living seems implied. The answer for all ages is suggested. Is it nano chips in the blood streams, or microwaved programs?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5jiGeQBLTk


Yeah, my gut busted a nut when the movie heroine was confronted with the notion of just who it would be that it would be willing to sacrifice its existence for?

And, she meditated on the question a moment... and, came back with the answer as being Ray Kurzweil... lol...lol... Of course it would be, its a Ray Kurzweil concocted story, with his being elevated to a god-like status within the A.I. (Artificial Intellect) of his created bot comes to its programmed understanding that it "loves" Ray Kurzweil - the real super hero of the day. lol!

What a depiction! Ego at its finest!!!

And as for the courtroom situation / outcome... the bot is found by the court to be a legal "person". Anybody that has studied the legal system knows that this has already taken place==> A corporation has been ruled to be a "person". As this is the only way the State can tax entities that it creates. A living-breathing heart pumping blood human being has to be turned into something that is created by the State - such an entity becomes "a person" - a body corp ==> an ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME corporation (hint: take a look at your driver's license) - and then, stamp a social security number on it. Nowadays, I believe its done right at the hospital, right after the child comes out of the birth canel.




Was Hollywood hired to film a better version?
A bright new blogger poses: “Trickery of 2018”?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwAeVXOyt5c&feature=share
Human Immortality Revealed PSYCHASEC Carbon Human Sleeve Test Leak



I would have to agree with the maker of this particular vid...

Thanks for sharing...

[turiya]

To start with... Anthony Patch, together with Kev Baker, demonstrate the similarity between the construct of the Djed Pillar of ancient Egypt, the Tower of Babel & the armatures of the D-Wave & IBM quantum computing systems....

Later, Anthony gets into showing that quantum A.I. technology has moved into using biological neurons for the beginning stages for development of transhumanism...




Athony Patch: Djed Pillar Relevancy to the
D-Wave & IBM Quantum Computer Construct
(Jan 21, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_wAN0z3e2A

TRANSCRIPTION (In part):

Kev Baker: This is where it starts to get very, very fascinating, indeed. Because some of the stuff he sent me today... Again, just sitting shaking my head, looking at it... thinking... Wow! ... Just wow!


http://sacredmysteries.com/jayweidner.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/23_.jpg

And, we're going to be talking about the djed (http://egypt.mrdonn.org/ankh3.jpg). Take us into it, Tony... I mean, Egypt, I love this of the best of things, but when we can connect this to things that are here today - this takes us to a whole new level, brother.

Anthony Patch: It really does... And, what we're talking about, if people want to type this in and look at Google images, or any other... I'll spell it again D-J-E-D... Now, this relates back to ancient Egypt & the hieroglyphs. And this is the symbol of Osiris. This represents the spinal column. Or, in some literature - the entire body of Osiris.

This is also... those of you that are familiar with the work of Tesla - think of the picture, the image of Tesla in his laboratory in Colorado Springs - he's seated in a chair with a large book in his lap. And there are lightning bolts of electricity - millions of volts of electricy that are emanating from the tower he is seated alongside inside his laboratory.


https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-giamPlxAa-M/VtoJXq8eEqI/AAAAAAAA04I/Hv48n2SABI8/s1600/nikola-tesla.jpg

Now, this was Tesla's coil, as its known. Its a voltage multiplier. Its low amperage, but it is high voltage - into the millions of volts. This is a voltage multiplier. And what he does, is at the base he begins with a low voltage source. And then through stacks of capacitors, he is then able to multiply the voltage into the millions. And then achieve a discharge of that electricity from the tower to another conductive target. Now, often times this is has been called Telsa's 'death ray'. That may, or may not, be.

The point here, this voltage multiplier is used in laboratories, now, for testing things like aircraft safety - in terms of aircraft being struck by bolts of lightning, and being able to... Well, you can't 'ground' and aircraft, but you can isolate & insulate it, so that the damage is minimized & certainly not affecting the passengers & crew on the aircraft.

My point here is that the Djed is even something that Tesla copied. And even today, this is copied in high-energy research laboratories.

But here is the interesting connection: if you were to take a look at the armature - the architecture - the construct or the layout of D-Wave & IBM - because IBM did the same thing - IBM's quantum computer is built identical to D-Wave's computer. And both of those computers are built accordingly to the structure of Tesla's voltage multiplier - Tesla's tower - which Tesla copied from ancient Egypt, which is the Djed. Which is the representation of Osiris' body, or more specifically, his spinal column.

And, if you look at the images - side by side - of the Djed, the quantum computer, and Tesla's coil, they are virtually identical in their architecture.


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cfvbDG-c3N4/hqdefault.jpg

Kev Baker: No, its quite striking. And even as you're speaking, here, I'm working frantically on the Photoshop. Because, I think it works better if you see these multiple images within the one bigger image. Because again, just like the quantum 'temple', Anthony, I was quite struck by these images, today. I mean, its quite uncanny the similarity between the 4 levels, or the 4 layers, on the djed.

And of course, when you look at either the D-Wave, or the IBM, architecture of their quantum chip, aleit it usually hides within the black cube of D-Wave. We can see... we've got the 4 layers there, again. And, it just that it blows me away, Anthony, every time, when I can add these visuals to what we're talking about. Because it really, really hammers the point home.


http://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/DWaveComputing.png

And then it just begs the question of what, just exactly, was going on back in ancient Egypt?

But today, we're building our quantum computers the same way, as structuresl, that people say that we don't really have any idea what the djed was about. We only have rough kind of hieroglyphs to go by. But I think we're putting together a picture tonight, that this was a highly important piece of... well, a highly important artifact, shall we say.

Anthony Patch: Now what we did in the January issue of Entangled magazine, thanks to Kev, he was able to super-impose the quantum chip-set, containing cubits - those are quantum bits - of D-Wave, overlaying that entire chip-set, not just the cubits, but the entire chip-set, including all of its wiring connections that comprise the full chip-set, itself. And laid that right over the blueprint, the image, of Herod's Temple, and the entire architecture of the Temple, itself, matched identically to the chip-set of D-Wave, including the location of the cubits in the chip-set being in the identical location of the Holy of Holies, located within the Temple. That is, as I said, the Holy of Holies is the point of communication - the access point. The cubits are also the access points, not communicating with God, but with Satan / Lucifer.

Geordie Rose, himself, has also given 'testimony', if you will, which we've transcribed into Entangled magazine, word-for-word, in which he is talking about accessing parallel dimensions. And obtaining resources from those parallel dimensions.

So, D-Wave's quantum computer, as well as IBM's 54 or 56 cubits quantum computer - they are built the same & they have the same purpose - and that is as having these as inter-dimensional communications tools. If you go to the Holy of Holies in the communicating with God - that was a communication tool. This is all being reproduced.

Now, the same thing in Egypt.
They were all about communicating with the dead - preserving the living to be resurrected. And obtaining the technology for the resurrection of the dead. The djed, itself, representing Osiris, it all fits into the mythos of the eventual resurrection of Osiris, in the name of Nimrod who built the Tower of Babel.

Kev Baker: Oh, absolutely, because the Tower of Babel, like you say... Anthony sent me a CD of images today. We all know that I like to play around on Photoshop. I'm one of these people that really finds it advantageous to be able to see what we're talking about. That might not make sense to some people out there. But when you got visual aids to look when Anthony is going through some of this stuff, it really makes it far more 'hard-hitting', and it really brings it closer to home what we're really talking about, here.

The Tower of Babel - we've all seen the common images out there on Google & beyond of the Tower of Babel. We're all use to seeing the architecture that lies within the D-Wave... you know - that golden thing that hangs down - whether that's really in there, or not, that's bye-the-bye.

However, it comes down to a point, and if you picture this, it comes down to a fine, and then you've got the chip hanging off the end. Well, something very interesting happens if you flip that upside-down. Do the 180, as myself & Anthony like to refer to. Because then, it takes a different shape altogether. And, in fact, it starts to look strikingly, eerily, like the Tower of Babel.


http://tfrlive.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/650_1516233775.jpg

I'll let you, Anthony, to take this a stage further, because I was blown away, again, when I turned this upside-down on its head. And it looks exactly like the Tower of Babel!


Full Kev Baker Show:

Dawn Of The Djed & The Quantum
Tower Of Babel with Anthony Patch
(Jan 21, 2018)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmT128d9PSY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmT128d9PSY)

[turiya]

Here we have some entrepreneurs playing around with the Djed Pillar ancient technology as referenced from Egyptian glyphs...


Ancient Technology:
"The DJED Project"
(Jun 19, 2014)

https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/-cPuMugnCvQ/0.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cPuMugnCvQ)

[turiya]

Yes, we are entering the Twilight Zone...


A Warning for Our Generation!
(Jan 21, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkQk4G0VST0



Description:

THERE IS SOMETHING VERY BIZARRE ABOUT THIS... ces 2018 booth immortality tech world news jason a 2018

[Bo Atkinson]

What a depiction! Ego at its finest!!!

...


Is the obsessive collection of personalized social data, an effort to create a replication of society, for a simulation library? To amass a digital simulation of mankind? Use complex networks to replicate “an internet of everything?”

The colossal wealth poured into the surveillance infrastructure is some sort of indicator. Where much of the recording seems to have no normal societal value. Where the same investment could otherwise have been poured into the decentralized entrepreneurial infrastructure.

I think that a chart of “furthermore-indicators” could define all of life, as a grand simulation, all around.

[turiya]

What a depiction! Ego at its finest!!!

...


Is the obsessive collection of personalized social data, an effort to create a replication of society, for a simulation library? To amass a digital simulation of mankind? Use complex networks to replicate “an internet of everything?”

The colossal wealth poured into the surveillance infrastructure is some sort of indicator. Where much of the recording seems to have no normal societal value. Where the same investment could otherwise have been poured into the decentralized entrepreneurial infrastructure.

I think that a chart of “furthermore-indicators” could define all of life, as a grand simulation, all around.




'Obsessive' appears to be the word most central in what you've stated. The word carries with it the notion that there is an implied imbalance. A state of health is one of balance. Health only comes into consideration when one becomes unhealthy. Otherwise, if one were to remain in a continual state of health, then the notion of having ill-health would never arise. And the need to regain health would not be a necessary consideration or desire to be fulfilled.

The same could be said for the state of "falling in love". Its an easy phrase to say "I'm in love", but it is difficult to define what actually occurs for one to attain that state. One cannot make it happen. It happens when it happens. That's why its called a 'falling'.... in love.

One may wonder what "falling in love" really means? But when one actually "falls in love", one absolutely knows it. It is unmistakable. It's truly an unforgettable experience, but not really understood what has actually taken place. The experience cannot be accurately described. It remains undefinable.

To me, "an internet of everything" is a misnomer. It simply is not a possibility. Contained within that notion of "an internet of everything" is the obsessive notion that everything will become known. An obsessive science would hold such a belief ==> that, science will one day know everything. One could even argrue that for science to have such a belief would turn this science into a religion, of sorts. And by a 'claimed' discovery of a "god particle", it appears that this is indeed the case. And, the scientists themselves being the priests of such a religion.


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/M9_GHcZIZPw/hqdefault.jpg

To me, there is that which is known, that which is unknown, and then there is also that which is unknowable. Its possible for that which is unknown, it can be known at some time, eventually, by science. But that which is unknowable can never be known. That unknowable part is beyond being amassed, contained, tabulated, accumulated within a digital library or within a computer. Hence, it will also be beyond A.I.

That which is unknowable is vast. However, that which is unknowable can be experienced by a human being. Experienced, yet still not understood. It will remain being a mystery. Life, itself, is a mystery. It will never be completely known. It will always remain in the arena of the unknowable.

But an obsessive science would contain such a notion - that which is unknown will eventually become known to science. An absurd notion, to say the least. And absolutely not attainable. To seriously consider the possibility that an A.I. can ever experience "falling in love" only proves that the particular scientist has never experienced love for himself.

And yes, its Ray Kurzweil to whom I am referring.

[turiya]

Well, maybe its good news....

Trump Administration Says It Has "No Plans" To Build "Nationalized" 5G Network (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/proposal-nationalized-5g-network-triggers-blowback-regulators-industry) -- ZeroHedge

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_small/public/2018-01/2018.01.29axios.JPG?itok=qsL5Npzr (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/proposal-nationalized-5g-network-triggers-blowback-regulators-industry)

Several senior White House officials told Recode Monday that the Trump administration has no plans to build a "nationalized" US 5G network...


Jan 29, 2018 11:53 AM


Jerome Corsi Retweeted (https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/724041403735638017/qa4EDYBw_normal.jpg
(https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC)Ajit Pai
(https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC)@AjitPaiFCC

(https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC)I oppose any proposal for the federal government to
build and operate a nationwide 5G network. The
market, not the government, is best positioned to
drive innovation and investment. go.usa.gov/xnGES (https://t.co/viIDB4mb0f?amp=1)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUty1vmW0AAKaDc?format=jpg&name=small (https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC/status/957985619887775744/photo/1)9:35 AM · Jan 29, 2018 (https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC/status/957985619887775744)
_________Late Add_________

Appears that a Military-Industrial-Complex (General Robert Spalding, Director of Strategic Planning at the National Security Council NSC) attempted to promote government build & own a 5G telecommunications system has been foiled.



Firestorm Over Govt Ownership of Next 5G Network Ignited by NSC Plan Backed by Google (https://www.infowars.com/firestorm-over-govt-ownership-of-next-5g-network-ignited-by-nsc-plan-backed-by-google/)

President Trump rejects NSC plan nationalizing 5G telecom
Jerome Corsi (https://www.infowars.com/author/jerome-corsi/) | Infowars.com January 30, 2018

NSC General and Google conspire in government 5G takeover plan:
Infowars.com research has established that certain individuals within the Trump administration NSC acted as co-conspirators with Google in the plan for the government to nationalize the U.S. next-generation 5G telecommunications network.
FCC strongly objects
When news of the NSC plan was circulated, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Ajit Pai fired off an immediate Tweet saying, “I oppose any proposal for the federal government to build and operate a nationwide 5G network. The market, not the government is best positioned to drive innovation and investment.”

Source: Infowars

[turiya]

Thanks, edina. I took the hint you left in the Qanon thread... a truly fantastic interview Lionel has with Thomas Paine...


You Will Be Completely Controlled — You Are Wetware
— Implanted Devices and Mind Control Hijack You
(Jan 21, 2018)

http://32pscm16mza81bp71x2anhjy.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Screenshot-2018-01-21-at-9.19.45-PM-400x250.png
VIDEO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xySOFEMR9n4)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xySOFEMR9n4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xySOFEMR9n4)

Description:



WARNING: THIS WILL BOGGLE YOUR MIND. Completely and permanently. Wetware is defined as "humorous: human brain cells or thought processes regarded as analogous to, or in contrast with, computer systems" and (chiefly in science fiction) "computer technology in which the brain is linked to artificial systems, or used as a model for artificial systems based on biochemical processes." No. This is here and now. This is not science fiction.

The front man for government Big Brother has been identified and he holds the most disruptive patent ever facing civilization and human evolution. I interview Thomas Paine who along with Betsy Ross explore the corrupt U.S. Patent Office and how it has laid the digital web over the entire planet. No one will be able to escape unless we act now to sever its hydra-head.

These are critical pieces that accompany and supplement the items discussed and referred.

https://patriots4truth.org/2018/01/12... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?redir_token=wMHloFwox2vNvJ1dvO58vjRqHnt8MTUxODk5NDQ1NUAxNTE4OTA4MDU1&v=xySOFEMR9n4&q=https%3A%2F%2Fpatriots4truth.org%2F2018%2F01%2F12%2Fhow-they-plan-to-control-everything-in-your-life%2F&event=video_description)

https://patriots4truth.org/2018/01/14... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?redir_token=wMHloFwox2vNvJ1dvO58vjRqHnt8MTUxODk5NDQ1NUAxNTE4OTA4MDU1&v=xySOFEMR9n4&q=https%3A%2F%2Fpatriots4truth.org%2F2018%2F01%2F14%2Fthe-many-iterations-of-the-clinton-foundation%2F&event=video_description)

Also ‘How Hillary Crashes Cars and Planes’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtcxO... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtcxOg1WYW8)

This was their most poignant video: Meet Big Brother — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIIbq... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIIbqNQj8Is)

[ThePythonicCow]

You Will Be Completely Controlled — You Are Wetware
— Implanted Devices and Mind Control Hijack You
(Jan 21, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xySOFEMR9n4


This has been posted before on this forum, as a search for the Youtube ID "PIIbqNQj8Is" will show.

Here are links to the prior posts, with date of posting and name of poster:

Cidersomerset - 21 Jan 2018 - Link to post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100794-Lionel-Interviews-Famed-Ufologist-Stanton-Friedman-UFOs-Flying-Saucers-and-EBEs-Are-Real-30-11-17&p=1203268&viewfull=1#post1203268)
Hip Hipnotist - 27 Jan 2018 - Link to post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?101496-Another-Lionel-Nation-Classic&p=1204393&viewfull=1#post1204393)
Cidersomerset - 7 Feb 2018 - Link to post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-a---Very-Bad-Day---Scenario-for-some-elite-swamp-critters--Nov-2017-and-beyond-&p=1206836&viewfull=1#post1206836)

I'm hoping that we won't be seeing yet more reposts of this now three week old video, but rather, when mention of it is relevant, links back to one of the above prior postings :).

[turiya]

The Truth About 2001's HAL 9000
The Anthony Patch Show
(Feb 18, 2018)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDuF0dPAK80_________TRANSCRIPTION________

The Truth About 2001's HAL 9000 Ep#60

http://a.cdnv2.artofthetitle.com/assets/sm/upload/bj/dk/cw/s9/2001_t.jpg


TRANSCRIPTION @ ~ 1:20

Anthony Patch:
We're going to talk about "2001 A Space Odessey". We're going to visit the HAL 9000 & talk about A.I. I think its appropriate after all the time we've spent talking about A.I. & quantum computers, etcetera...

We take a visit back to 1968 & we re-visit the HAL, in light of what we know about A.I. today, as it compares to the 'prescient' presentation of A.I. by Stanley Kubrick & Author C. Clark, in this absolutely pivotal movie - not just in the world of entertainment & in science fiction, but really for society.

I believe we need to take a close look at this from a variety of perspectives - not just from the scientific - but I think from the philosophical, and maybe even a little of the spiritual.

Kev Baker: I imagine that there's some people out there who don't really pay attention to the worlds of technology & alternative media & stuff like that.

Older people out there, their only real point of reference when it comes to A.I. might actually be something like the HAL 9000 - something that's seen in the movie 2001: A Space Odessey.

And when I was a little bit of reading up on HAL today, at the time this would have been called 'all-singing, all-dancing - this would have been looking like the all-powerful A.I. system of the future.

However, you know, some of the AIs that we talk about, Anthony, and some of the things that the various AIs are able to do, it almost puts HAL into the corner, because we've come so far.

Anthony Patch: I would agree with that statement. I mean, HAL was portrayed as being error-free, as being infallible. And that was the pivot-point in the plot-line when he made a mistake, or what was perceived by the crew as a mistake.

And that sent chills down the spine of the crew members, realizing the implications of a computer that possibly could go afoul, could cause a problem. And so they went to the extent of basically deactivating his higher thought processes, the entire systems within his brain. And the dilemma was... they were talking to each other about this. No one has ever attempted this before. And,
"How do you think HAL is going to react to this?"
And therein lies the second half of the movie.

Kev Baker: Absolutely. HAL, for anyone who might not have seen this actual movie, Arthur C. Clark's adaptation from the novel, but HAL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000) stands for a Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer. And they quantify this, Anthony, as a 'sentient' computer. This is one of these artificial general intelligences that we often talk about.

Anthony Patch: Yeah, definitely.

HAL was designed to run the systems on the ship Discovery that was headed to Jupiter. And, as you pay attention to what is going on in the movie beyond just the script, beyond the dialog...

If you look at the two astronauts, they actually operate more like robots than they do as humans. The one that is the real human crew member is actually HAL the computer, the A.I. computer, who is sentient. And one of the questions that comes up is,
"Does HAL have feelings?"
Now, there's a reporter who is interviewing the crew members & he asked them the questions, "Does he have emotions?" And, of course, Dave Bowman says, "Well, we're not sure, but he's programmed that way. He's programmed to appear to have emotions. So that it makes it more comfortable for us to interact with him."

So again, it always comes back to the point that they're dealing with a machine. And yet, they present the actors as being almost devoid of emotions. They go on about their duties. They exercise. They relax. They eat as humans do. But they really don't display any emotions in this entire movie.

And yet, you see the eye movements & the facial body language that is utilized to convey, silently, between the two humans. And then they make the mistake of going into one of the pods. And they're discussing HAL with the intercom system turned off. And it turns out that HAL can read lips & that becomes their undoing. And then, of course, HAL kills one crew member & then attempts to kill the other.


https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-b6adb64966ff880d37a9f099141d2160

We go to the whole discussion of... Okay, did HAL, did he actually commit an error when he misdiagnosed the failure within 72 hours of one of the transmitting components from the satellite? Was that not just a red herring? To then, in a chess-like strategic fashion, to eventually cause a return to the antenna, to reinstall this device, so that it would, then, fail.

Was that an excuse to get one of the astronauts outside the spacecraft so that he could be killed?


https://abagond.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/hal_playing_chess.jpg

And was it, then, predictable? Because in the movie, they show HAL playing chess with one of crew members, who ends up being the first fatality. Does HAL play chess so well that he thinks multiple moves ahead of his human opponents, and is able to plot out they're demise, by claiming that there was a failure in one of the antenna components?

So, you have to look at this in terms of... "Well, that's fairly obvious." But you need to dig deeper. Because we've talked about things like 'Alpha-go', 'Big Blue', IBM playing chess several years ago & for the 1st time beating a human chess master... We look at this in terms of how the computer learns in the beginning, in its infancy. It learns by observing human behavior. The same that a child does in observing its parents. The behavior of the parents is something that the child adopts & mimics.

A computer does the same thing through observation. And builds its 1st algorithms based on observation. And then it moves on to where we have gone, at the tip of the spear, where it is a self-learning - a cursive neural network system in which its able to not only teach its offspring, but the offspring, then, exceeds that of the teacher, and that of the parent.

So, you have to layer in this discussion that we've had for over a year into, now - looking retroactively at HAL and how he is portrayed.

Its important to understand what Stanley Kubrick was trying to show us, without being explicit, he purposely produced a movie that would cause people to ask a great many more questions than there were answers readily provided in a passive way to the audience. It was to provoke critical thinking in the audience - to think critically on their own, to think independently.

Now, the question with HAL is: Is HAL actually able to think independently, independent of his core programming? Just like his emotions, or program to mimic human emotions & behavior, based upon observation of human behavior.

So the question I pose to you, Kev, for the audience is: Can a sentient A.I. system step out of its programming? Did HAL step out & exceed his programming? And, begin to think independently? And, is that a central component in the definition of 'sentient status' in an artificially intelligent system? [10:10]

Kev Baker: Well, I think it eventually does start to work independently.

As we've seen in the past, using an example, this was an A.I. that was used to pick candidates for top jobs in the medical industry - a hospital. And, like you were saying, these computers, almost like a child, they learn from the parents. In this case the parents, have all of the information about previous employee & previous hiring in the past. And, its learned from all that information. And, this is where the biases creep in.

Now, they can sometimes spot the bias that it might pick up from the programming, or from the parents - in the human kind of equivalent. But it took the programmer to go back in to readjust the programming of the A.I. in question for it to do the task independently, without falling back into the biases of the past data. And the past data led to the A.I. always recommending that males were actually put forward for these roles. And obviously in the past, we've seen how there was sexism in the work place. And, males work pushed above females very often. And that's how the A.I. turned out.

Now, did the A.I. decide itself that it was getting it wrong? Well, not in that case. And, Tony, you asked "Does this independent thinking does that equal 'sentience'?

Well, if it had independently done that, then I would say.... this is a hard... Tony, because if it recognizes its been making a mistake & corrects itself (self-correcting)... I mean, does that necessarily mean its 'sentient'? Or, is that a by-product of the programming?

Anthony Patch: And I think that is the central core issue in 20001: What defines a sentient? - be it a computer, which is just a mechanism, just nuts & bolts? Does it actually achieve human-like sentient status?

Now the next question in parallel to that is:

Can you assign a anthropomorphic definition of sentient, as it applies to humans?
Can you apply the same criteria in defining sentient in a nuts & bolts system, in a computational device?
Is it even fair to try to apply our definitions that we apply to ourselves as being sentient beings?
Is it fair to even try to assign that definition to a mechanism?

I think this is where we get into this philosophical discussion.

Is it even necessary for a computational device to be sentient in an identical fashion to a human?
Why can't it be considered just another life form?
Why can't it have its own sentient status & its own definition of sentient?
Why do we have to force this anthropomorphic philosophy & perspective onto a device, onto a machine?
Is it just simply so we can be compatible with it?

Kev Baker: I think further down the line, Tony, these machine will actually be given rights. And I know that this sounds really silly, but we've had the European Union (EU), they've been meeting, they talk about robotic rights. And, if they can anthropomorphize it enough, then you know that there will be teachers on sale saying, "A.I. lives matter!"

Laugh if you want, but I really think that this is where they're going with this.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. I agree with you. I agree with you. Again, they're trying to put human traits, rights & privileges onto a device. And we're seen this with granting citizenship status to Sophia & her partner Michael. And so, I agree with you.

They will continue to do this 'A.I. lives matter' because they're trying to keep it human-like. That's a double-edged sword. That can create pros & cons. But again, trying to stick to the highlights, and we can revisit this a little later on....

We have to bring in the factor of the movie - the outside factor - because there's more players than just the humans & the computer, HAL, in this scenario. And that is the topic of aliens. This is the black monolith, the rectangular monolith that is presented to the apes.


https://www.musicaememoria.com/frames/img-2001-a-space-odyssey-monolite-discovery.jpg

Now, its obvious, but I'm going to state it, especially for people that have never seen the movie....

This is a very pro-evolutionary movie. It portends that there is this visitation by a higher intelligent race - call them aliens - just because anything outside of Earth is an extraterrestrial, by definition. And therefore, is an alien to our planet.

But this monolith is provided by this higher life-form, this higher intelligence. And the apes interact with it. They actually touch it. And they are imparted by new knowledge through this physical contact. And because of that, it alters evolution. It provides them insights into weaponry. And so, we make the leap from the infamous image of the tossing into the air of the weapon - the bone, the femur - by one of the apes. And from that, we make the leap to a spacecraft being presented on the screen. And then the space station.

So, its very important that we understand the grounded perspective that this movie is written from. And that is the evolutionary perspective on humans & on life. Therefore, factor in the evolution of A.I.

Now, I don't adhere to evolution - being a Christian - I don't believe that is how we progressed. Adam & Eve, Garden of Eden - that's the starting point. We didn't come from the Great Apes. We didn't come from the amoebas in the pond scum.

Setting all of that aside...
We focus on the fact the movie is written by Stanley Kubrick & Author C Clark from an evolutionary standpoint.

The reason that I am harping on this, is because this applies to HAL - the A.I. Is HAL evolving? Has HAL been influenced by this intelligent race? Has HAL been given information that the crew is not privy to?


http://www.collativelearning.com/PICS%20FOR%20WEBSITE/stills%204/poole%20spinning.jpg

And, for the sake of the mission, as HAL even says in the dialogue. HAL says, he's trying to preserve the mission. Hal kills the humans because they, the crew, are putting the mission at risk. And HAL sees this as a higher potential. HAL sees this as a higher mission for himself, than the value of the lives of five humans - three in stasis, hibernation, and two that were not.

So I think its important to understand that the evolutionary thread moves through this. And, was HAL evolving?

So, it begs the question: Can the computer exceed, through evolution, its programming? Can the A.I., HAL, exceed its programming. Can HAL make a quantum leap, much like the apes made through influence from the outside... making a quantum leap in their evolution.

Is it fair to say that HAL was influenced from the outside by a higher form of intelligence that altered its programming, thus altering HAL's evolution?

I know that's a lot. What are your general thoughts on that, Kev?

Kev Baker: I think an A.I. - in this case HAL - I think it certainly could evolve. I really do. This is one of the dangers that we really have today with the A.I.s that we have. And, especially with these ones that are 'self-correcting', writing their own algorithms, their own codes, to the point that the programmers don't even understand it anymore. I mean, where is that coming come?

I mean, are they already in contact with something else?

I definitely am very, very pro towards the idea of these AIs being able to evolve into even greater, or worse.

Anthony Patch: I would agree with you whole-heartedly. Because, we have talked about the fact that A.I. is able to exceed its own parent, its own teacher. And that is because of this self-learning recursive process.

In other words, in recursive neural network programming, you're running thousands of iterations of a given problem, or a task. If the computer gets it wrong, it learns from its mistakes. And, the more times you can learn from your mistakes, the faster you're going to advance in your ability to reduce errors in the future. In other words, you can more rapidly advance towards perfection.

So, the fly-in-the-ointment, here, are the humans. The humans have emotions. But beyond just their emotions, which are separate from HAL's programmed emotions, I go back to their unspoken form of communication...

The two crew members - forget about HAL reading the lips, that's easy - you have to look at the expressions in their faces, even before they enter the pod, when they first determine & they're communicating back to Earth with NASA about the problem, that there has been a fault in HAL who has incorrectly said that there is a problem with the antenna.


http://www.thespacereview.com/archive/2862a.jpg

They look at each other!

Stanley Kubrick pulls in for an extreme close-up on Gary Lockwood's eyes. He's showing the audience what the computer cannot do. Humans not speaking, with an unspoken language, just with the look of the eye, with just a facial expression, are able to communicate with each other. And both crew members know exactly, without a word spoken, that HAL is their enemy, and they have to disconnect him.


https://www.curezone.org/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/ANDREW_BARTZIS/A_I/GARY_LOCKWOOD_S_EYES.png

So, then they go into the pod & they have a conservation. And it is laid out to those that are not paying attention to Kubrick. Even to the trite little thing of reading lips, that's just to make it easy for the people that are not observing & paying attention.

But this is the nub of the issue. HAL cannot do what humans do. HAL cannot use a facial expression & the look of the eye to communicate non verbally, and to draw conclusions as to what their next action are going to be.

That is the genius of Stanley Kubrick.

Kev Baker: I have to back you up on that. I mean, Stanley Kubrick, he really was... I mean, not many people are very deserving of the title 'genius', but when it comes to movie making, Kubrick was way ahead of the rest.

I suspect that his life was cut short. Because, the last movie he was working on which was, Eyes Wide Shut, and of course, they re-edited that after his passing away, and it was never the film that he intended. And, later on in life, it was almost as if Kubrick was trying to tell us exactly what was going on in reality all around us.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. And there's been a lot of discussion about that. And discussions about how he used his tricks of the camera that possibly were carried over to fake the Moon landing.

What I'm really just astounded by... is this movie really, really had a huge influence, even subconsciously, on the human psyche.


________________[show break]________________

[KiwiElf]

The latest "X-Files" episode 11.7 features a humorous & chilling story - AI run amok.. "We Learn from You" ;)

[Bob]

The latest "X-Files" episode 11.7 features a humorous & chilling story - AI run amok.. "We Learn from You" ;)

I thought that was great episode too. It does play on the fears tho of people of/with technology. I doubt anybody would program 'them' that way, and not have a proper "kill switch" in the code.

[turiya]

The following is cross-posted from another thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?58865-An-Update-On-Our-Evolution-by-Chris-Thomas&p=1212217&viewfull=1#post1212217).... regarding A.I. and Arthur C. Clark....



The latest "X-Files" episode 11.7 features a humorous & chilling story - AI run amok.. "We Learn from You" ;)

I thought that was great episode too. It does play on the fears tho of people of/with technology. I doubt anybody would program 'them' that way, and not have a proper "kill switch" in the code.



I don't know Bob, an A.I. can beat a human chess master pretty easily at a game of chess.

If an A.I. were programmed to reach a targeted goal from the programmer's perspective, and if the A.I. saw humans as to be interfering with its programmed objective, it just might look several steps ahead to eliminate that so-called 'interference'. Especially, if the programmer - "the person behind the curtain" - is an extraterrestrial race of beings that have an agenda of their very own. - i.e. elimination of the human race in order to possess the planet Earth for themselves...

I have heard that ETs have been known to break into nuclear missile silos and manipulate the electronic launch sequencing to malfunction &/or fail. Who's to say what havoc ETs can play with A.I. robots & their relation to humankind?

Anthony Patch believes that Arthur C. Clark was channeling demonic spirits in the writings of his books, of which "2001: A Space Odessey" was one.

From my perspective, Anthony Patch is an admitted ET alien denier - doesn't believe in ETs whatsoever. So, when Anthony refers to "demonic spirits" & "Fallen Angels" & "Satanic forces", to me, it translates into malevolent ET aliens that have no interest in playing nice with the human race of beings that reside on this planet.

Have to wait & see where this may end up leading to.... w/ bag of popcorn in hand, of course... :popcorn:

[turiya]

Continuing with above Post #112 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100704-The-Dark-Secret-at-the-Heart-of-AI&p=1212174&viewfull=1#post1212174)...


http://www.studiofynn.com/sites/default/files/styles/journal_main/public/images/journal/future-data-center-and-elevating-brand-values/hal_0.jpg?itok=URvRfFWo (https://youtu.be/1tprpYMcWb0?t=28m30s)

The Truth About 2001's HAL 9000
(The Anthony Patch Show - Part 2)
(Feb 18, 2018).

https://youtu.be/1tprpYMcWb0?t=28m30s (https://youtu.be/1tprpYMcWb0?t=28m30s)

__________________________________

TRANSCRIPTION @ ~ 28:30 (https://youtu.be/1tprpYMcWb0?t=28m30s)

The acronym HAL - 'Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000)' - the 'heuristic' portion of the name - I am just going to read this, because this is important. This ties into D-Wave & the quantum computers that we've been talking about...

Heuristic (computer science)

Definition and motivation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_(computer_science)#Definition_and_motivation)

The objective of a heuristic is to produce a solution in a reasonable time frame that is good enough for solving the problem at hand. This solution may not be the best of all the solutions to this problem, or it may simply approximate the exact solution. But it is still valuable because finding it does not require a prohibitively long time.

Heuristics may produce results by themselves, or they may be used in conjunction with optimization algorithms to improve their efficiency (e.g., they may be used to generate good seed values).

Results about NP-hardness in theoretical computer science make heuristics the only viable option for a variety of complex optimization problems that need to be routinely solved in real-world applications.

Heuristics underlie the whole field of Artificial Intelligence and the computer simulation of thinking, as they may be used in situations where there are no known algorithms.[2] -- Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_(computer_science)#Definition_and_motivation)Optimization. Combinatorial optimization of algorithms is exactly what D-Wave & IBM uses in their programming & the running of those programs.

This is about probabilities. Probabilities spring forth from quantum mechanics. Quantum computers adhere to the mechanisms of quantum mechanics. Optimization of algorithms & heuristic programming has to do with probabilities.

Why is it probabilities?
Because there are no absolutes in the quantum world. Even in classical mechanics, from the atom & molecule on up, at what you might consider the macro-scale. There are more clearly defined rules in physics, which experimentally can be reproduced. And as best as humans can make them, they then can be used as absolute proofs of theories. And through calculus, can use mathematical formulae to arrive at a human level that we can call an 'absolute'.

Now, when you talk about probabilities, you're talking about quantum mechanics as it pertains to sub-atomic particles. And the probabilities are focused specifically on particles themselves.

I'm going to make this very suscinct...
If you look at the double-slit experiment, you'd now have the wave-particle-duality discussion coming in. And, the probabilities of the locations of particles as represented by the probability graphing of those locations as graphically represented as waveforms.

That, in a nutshell, is wave-particle duality (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality)... there is much more to it.

What I'm getting at, here, is HAL operated on the basis of probability - using the optimization of algorithms, in which you take ALL PROBABLE... probable solutions. And you run those probable solutions simultaneously. And, you arrive at your best heuristic solution. It may not be an absolute solution. It may not be an exact solution. But if your operating in the world of quantum mechanics, you are now coming up with the best PROBABLE solution to a problem.
Why is all of this even relevant to 2001?
Because it takes us down to the deepest, deepest most minute level of what was going on with this movie.

I said that this had a major impact - even subconsciously - upon the human psyche. Because it brought in a new life form. It brought in A.I. in 1968 as a movie.

Now whether people have seen the movie or not - even those who have never seen the movie - were effected by it. How? Because, this movie spawned the generations of scientists who took their inspiration from Stanley Kubrick & Arthur C. Clark and pursued A.I.

This will be all laid out in the March 1st issue of Entangled magazine. This will be an 'on-fire' issue.

What I am saying, here, in terms of the human psyche will be all in every single person on this planet. I don't care if you're in the deepest, darkest jungle of the Amazon. You have been touched by computers based on transistors... Now, quantum computers based on quantum bits called cubits... And, you have been touched by A.I.
How can I say that?
One, but one, one very simple, but all-encompassing example of how you touch over 7 billion people on the planet is through 5G broadcasting, which the entire planet is fully immersed.

Don't listen to Verizon & these others that they're still rolling it out, and still rolling out - 5G we are totally immersed in. Everybody has been touched by A.I.

A.I. utilizes, through the 'Internet-of-All-Things', 5G for the broadcasting & the sensor transmission of information back to the A.I. systems.

Now, we've covered all that sentient world communication, etc., etc.

What I'm getting at, here, is that HAL influenced our lives today. An artificially intelligent computer - yes, created in a fictional world of a book, in a movie, it influenced our reality. It altered our reality. And we're dealing with it today. And this is why I'm dealing with it in Entangled magazine, is that A.I. has influenced every single person - every Joe-bag-of-donuts - walking down the street has been touched by A.I.

Now what's started this, Kev - this going out to orbit - was our good friend, Sidney Burns, whose invited me to make a presentation in front of his national engineering organization in Las Vegas in July. And he asked me to go beyond the 30 thousand, or the 90 thousand-foot elevation that we've gone to, Kev, and throwing the 'big picture' perspective on some of these topics.

He said, "Go out to the international space-station level - that perspective - and present that to my engineering audience in Las Vegas. And I said, "Okay, I'll write you a new paper."


http://spacecollective.org/userdata/v2dsN4cJ/1195579933/shot0004.png

That paper is my editorial that will be coming out on the 1st of March (2018). Because, when I went out to the space-station, what triggered in my mind was the image of the space-station, rotating above the Earth in 2001. And this is the rabbit hole that I'm taking my audience down tonight, Kev, because of a simple suggestion from our very good friend, Sidney Burns - an engineer - who put together a fantastic Threat-Matrix in September and presented at Full-Spectrum-Dominance, a webinar available at AnthonyPatch.com. And then we published it again in the February issue his Threat-Matrix.

So, this is germane to everyone listening - this discussion of HAL. Because we can mark it in our society as a turning point in science.

Now, what is the origin of Arthur C. Clark's 2001: A Space Odessey?

Kev is going to a little touch-point. We're going to give you, perhaps, some things you've heard before. But we're going to give you a couple of inside touch-points about the movie & Arthur C. Clark. But understand, from a theological standpoint - Arthur C. Clark was not a Christian. He did not share the perspective that I have, as a Christian. He didn't look at life through the same lenses that the Holy Spirit gives me. This is why he brought in evolution.

And this is why I bring up the topic of evolution. Because it taints, it colors, it color-izes the movie... And all that is playing out - all the way to the end, which if you will recall... at the end of the movie, the movie closes with a fetus in the womb floating above the Earth like a space station, looking down on Earth, as a new race of beings.

Kev Baker: You know, I was getting altitude sickness at 90,000 feet. And now you've taken me up to 408 kilometers, Anthony. Now, this is definitely where we can get a better perspective on things - that altitude of the ISS .

Listeners to my own show & people who have listened to us working together, they know I'm a big fan of movies, and also like to read many books, as well. And we know that, from time to time, when you get films & adaptations from a novel, there's going to be little differences.

You know, this was strange in the first place. The film came out, and then the novel actually came out shortly afterwards. But in the novel, the Discovery 1 spaceship which they were on for this mission, its actually going to Saturn. But Kubrick made the film, he swapped that out, and he made a very important change, indeed. Because he almost occulted what Arthur C. Clark was pointing towards by swapping Saturn for Jupiter. And I think that is a really major change between the actually plot in the novel & the plot in the film. Because, we've spent often enough many hours the connections to Saturn, right?

Anthony Patch: We certainly have - in Saturnalia, and the worship of the Black Sun, and all of these things. And, in the mythos, Saturn spawned Jupiter. So, there is a connection there.

But you used the word 'occulted'. And absolutely... I'm going to through a huge blanket over this from the orbital space-station... This is an occulted movie. This is a movie that is speaking from a non-Christian perspective. Now, you can take that anyway you want... you can put you're own theistic flavor onto that... everyone has their own perspective.

From my perspective, with my lenses on of the Holy Spirit, I'm now looking at this movie completely differently. This is a very dark movie.

Now, I saw this in 1968. I was sixteen-years-old. And then I saw it a second time in a special presentation in a local high school. And I knew this movie made an impact on me - just the visuals alone. But you can't stop there. And, that's where I'm at today - is looking at this with a completely new set of lenses.

When you just start with the fact that its evolutionary, that's bad enough. When you get to the point of looking at how HAL was programmed, and how he behaves. And what influenced his behavior - it was an outside influence from another intelligence.

Now from my Christian perspective, I would say he was spiritually influenced. Because, as far as I'm concerned, any entity outside of what God has created here on the Earth is spiritual.

I know a lot of people are going to disagree with me. But I do not believe that there are other life forms, in the sense of human life forms, or aliens that look different from us, but are sentient - that have an equal, or lower, or even higher intelligence than us.

And I know that's not acceptable in today's discussion of aliens, and the fact that there's other worlds that have been observed by NASA - Never A Straight Answer - in which there's a probability of life existing on other planets.

Okay, I get it. I get it. I get the narrative of today. But I don't buy into it. Now that's controversial, but I'm just putting it out there - just trying to be transparent, in the vernacular of today.

I believe that God created mankind in His image. And, we only exist on this one planet.

Now, I could be proven wrong - that there are other human-like life forms in the cosmos. And that's fine. But I'm sticking with what we can prove, empirically - empirically prove - right here on this Earth, that we're the only humans.

So, with HAL being influenced by something that was other than human, by definition, HAL was influenced by aliens.


http://turingchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/arthur-c-clarke.jpg

I take the position that HAL was influenced by spirits. And these are not God's angels. These are the angels of Satan. And I take the position that Arthur C. Clark was channeling from Demonic spirits a 2001: A Space Odessey. And his other books that I've read of his.

Again, controversial. Was the guy prescient, was he far-seeing, was he responsible for describing the putting of satellites in Earth orbit?

Absolutely - Communication Satellites by Arthur C. Clark. Got it. I understand the narrative. But understand the origins of his way of thinking - Arthur C. Clark. Understand the influence on him. And understand the influence on what Stanley Kubrick were doing. I will say this: I think that Kubrick & Clark were at odds with one another.

Kev, you mentioned Eyes Wide Shut...


http://listat.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-4.png
[I]Eyes Wide Shut

Kev Baker: Yeah, I was going say, I mean, Kubrick tried to expose to the world the real dark shenanigans that goes on with the elites in Eyes Wide Shut.

You know, I hate to say it, but Arthur C. Clark would have been more partial to keeping that secret & and attending the parties that were exposed in that movie. So, I definitely think they were opposing personalities.


https://scitechdaily.com/images/The-Possible-Origins-of-Jupiter-and-Saturn.jpg

Anthony Patch: So, you also mentioned Saturn & Jupiter.

I'm going to give you another touch-point in the opposing conflict, here....
Arthur C. Clark initially wanted to present the tetrahedron, rather than the rectangular monolith. But the problem was, Kubrick said (as well as the studio),

"Nobody's going to know what a tetrahedron is."
Well, I would say that a lot of people, until they started listening to us, didn't even know what a tetrahedron was, unless they happened to enjoy geometry.

Kev Baker: We wouldn't have a problem slipping a tetrahedron in now, people would be well aware of what it is, right?


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e2/16/e0/e216e0d4c941bf71f516bb67a498fce8.jpg

Anthony Patch: I think so.

So, rather than the tetrahedron, or even the black cube... which was going to be a compromise, as well, between Clark & Kubrick, was to use a cube... But then, the 'powers that be', that eventually had that influence over Kubrick said,

"No, no, no, no... You can't put in a black cube, and you especially can't put it on Saturn." Why? "Because, you're going to give the whole story away!"

"It's revealing too much. You have to occult it. Make it Jupiter, instead Saturn. And, make it a rectangle, instead of a tetrahedron or a black cube." The point here is: Those guys (Kubrik & Clark) were under orders. And they were conflicting with each other. And, there were conflicting with 'The Powers That Be' in putting that movie together.

This is a very dark movie. This is about A.I. destroying the human race!

So, what ended up happening with Dave Bowman - the surviving astronaut?

He ends up being transported through a blackhole. He has an environment that is, let's say, 3D printed (in our vernacular of today), in which the aliens took from his mind, in his memories, his physical environment - and they created that environment for him. And then he progressed through in these bleeps of his life-span, until eventually he reaches old-age.

And, at old-age, he spontaneously converts from an old man to a new race of beings - the Star Child - as seen at the end of the movie, above the Earth.


http://ruspravda.info/images/original/the-best-non-fiction-films.png

Folks, this is not God-made, this is not God created, this is not how God produces Life. This is not transhumanism, this is not uploading of A.I. into a biological life-form, creating (in the transhumanist vernacular) a new race of beings.

But this was exactly what Clark was presenting. And, what I think, Kubrick was trying to warn us about... I think the benevolent one, here, is Kubrick. I think the malevolent one was Clark.

It is visually a stunning movie. The music is compelling. The storyline is simplistic in its lack of dialogue, which then causes the audience to move into a state of mind (because there is very little dialogue) of thinking for themselves. And creating the dialogue where it does not exist. The end of that point is critical thinking. It is questions.

This movie is so profound in its ability, and this is Kubrick's genius, to cause people to think for themselves.

Consider, when you go to a movie theater, or you turn on the boob-tube, you are passively receiving information. You are being entertained. This movie is not entertaining. It is thought provoking. And that is what I am offering to you, today.

Don't take the things the media is giving you at face value & take it as entertainment. Go deeper. Think about it critically. I don't care what it is they are showing you on TV, in commercials, movies & in the theaters.

It's just like the news - the propaganda news - I don' care if its Fox, MSN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS... its all propaganda. Go beyond that & look at why are they presenting a given message?

Okay, we had 17 kids murdered in Florida. And they spend every single day since then, every hour of the day, beating it into your psyche.


https://static.lakana.com/mmm-global-us-east-1/photo/2018/02/15/Nikolas%20Jacob%20Cruz%20and%20Stoneman%20Douglas%20High%20School.jpg.jpg_10378732_ver1.0_640_360.jp g

Why are they doing that?
That's the question, I, as Stanley Kubrick, pose to you.

Go beyond the narrative, and think psychologically - Why are they putting this narrative out? To what end? To what direction are they trying to push you? Psychologically?

Now, that is in my editorial, as well. I delve into the psychology - not just of 2001, but what is it that is going on in the world of A.I. that is psychologically influencing every single person, every Joe-bag-of-donuts on the planet today?

This is psychological warfare... 2001.... Not entertainment... Psychology....
[END @ 47:45]

___________________Show Break_______________________

[turiya]

cross-posted from another thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?58865-An-Update-On-Our-Evolution-by-Chris-Thomas&p=1212283&viewfull=1#post1212283)....


When you do some programming machine code, please of all means let me know, when you have done advanced AI programming let me know - each is entitled to our opinions are we not?

As I said, I thought the X-Files episode was designed SPECIFICALLY to play on people's fears.. And of course priming those fears is obvious a way to get good traction is it not? I don't buy it and never will... Been there when it all started.. And watched it develop.. I'm entitled to my opinion and you are yours. As is Kiwi's.. The episode was nice fantasy :)



Quote Posted by Bob
Quote Posted by KiwiElf View Post
The latest "X-Files" episode 11.7 features a humorous & chilling story - AI run amok.. "We Learn from You"

Bob: I thought that was great episode too. It does play on the fears tho of people of/with technology. I doubt anybody would program 'them' that way, and not have a proper "kill switch" in the code.

And considering that you stole my and Kiwi's quote from another thread and posted it here it is VERY CLEAR to me and should be to the General Public - what appears to be an intent to manipulate viewpoint of the public. I disagree that such is a good ethical behavior. I will personally consider each and every one of your posts as "SUSPECT" from the onset to here on out. Be well Turiya.. It was interesting while it lasted.



Thanks, Bob, for your being a good skeptic. Skepticism is not a bad quality to have. I am a hardened skeptic myself. I don't see it as something that would arouse suspicion, at all. For only through doubt==> taking doubt to its absolute extreme ==> can a solid trust arise from out of its ashes.

BTW, I don't see cross-posting posted messages onto different threads that are relevant as an act of stealing. That would be your mis-interpretation. As, everything once written on these boards doesn't belong to either of us. It belongs now to the Project Avalon website.

cheers, & back to you... :)

[turiya]

https://spaceflightuk.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/elon-musk-wired.jpg?w=625&h=351&crop=1 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tprpYMcWb0&feature=youtu.be&t=52m23s)

The Truth About 2001's HAL 9000 Part 3
(QUANTUM ENTANGLED MIND-CONTROL)
By Anthony Patch

TRANSCRIPTION STARTS @ ~ 52m23s (https://youtu.be/1tprpYMcWb0?t=52m23s)

Anthony Patch: Let's talk about Elon Musk for a few minutes, okay?

Kev Baker: Yes, please. I don't need any encouragement to talk about Elon. You know that, Tony. lol!

Anthony Patch: Well he's quite remarkable with his Space-X program. We're not talking cars tonight, folks, we're talking about broadband. And this comes from Bloomberg Technology.

The headline from February 14 [2018] by Todd Shields is:

Elon Musk's Broadband From Space Plan Clears Crucial U.S. Hurdle (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-14/spacex-plan-for-broadband-via-satellite-backed-by-fcc-chairman) Kev, you pick this thing up. And, tell the audience how this fits into the whole discussion of 5G & the immersion of the human race within it.

Kev Baker: Well, would you like to listen to Elon first? Or, the video? Or...

Anthony Patch: Yeah, let's do the video.

Kev Baker: Yeah, let's get into the video. And the video is actually titled, "Outer Space is About to Get a Whole Lot Closer." Take a listen to this...


A Hundred Space Rockets per Day

(Sep 13, 2017)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h67VX51QXiQ
This is definitely is going to be happening a lot sooner than we think.

Because, this is going to be Elon Musk's next big thing. He is getting into the world of satellite broadband. And just last year, Space-X was rumored to have actually asked for permission to deploy & operate 4,425 satellites which will be approximately 700-800 miles above the Earth.

Now, your question before that video, Anthony, was to do with 5G & our full immersion. And, if people can picture 5G networks the way they would be as just now being ground-based, then we often talk about the receivers & transmitters that have to be everywhere, Anthony.

I'm not saying that the satellite broadband is going to do away with that. But picture the fact that this 5G is going to be coming down from above us onto the entire footprint of the planet.

Now, how do you escape the full immersion when its surrounding everything, Tony?

Anthony Patch: Yeah. Think back to our good friend & researcher Illana Freeland & her book, "Full Spectrum Dominance". And she presented in September [2017] in our conference called 'Full Spectrum Dominance - The Space-Based Fence''

I know she's having a field day with this information, Kev. Let's quote the Republic FCC chief - Pai is his last name. He said:

[Space-X's program] could help "unleash the power of satellite constellations to provide high-speed internet to rural Americans." So from an American-centric perspective, they're talking about reaching everybody in America.

Now obviously, you're placing in orbit over 4,000 satellites 700-800 miles above the Earth. These are not just for the Americans. This is for the entire planet. And this is the full deployment.


http://www.getconnected.aero/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Iridium_NEXT_605px.jpg (http://www.getconnected.aero/2017/05/rockwell-collins-iridium-satcom-737-max/)
An artist’s impression of an Iridium NEXT satellite.

We've talked about Iridium Corporation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_Communications) placing a diamond constellation patterns - their 5G satellites - all around the Earth. And this is just adding to the density of that.

As a side note, Kev, didn't you say that the International Space Station is orbiting at, what, 450 miles above the Earth?

Kev Baker: Let me take just one last look at that again... I think it was something like 408.... Yeah, 408 kilometers.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. So, we've got 1,110-1,325 kilometers... The point is: They're going to be crashing into the Space Station. They're a completely different orbital pathways. But, we've taken our perspective out beyond the Space Station, where we were talking earlier, Kev. Now, we're going out to 'Elon' elevation in space.

And what's interesting is that Elon has reduced the cost of launching satellites into space by using reusable, recyclable, launch vehicles that can land on a barge, they can land on the ground without being damaged. And that's extraordinary.

But let's take it out to a little bit bigger perspective. Let's go up to their constellation orbit at 1,325 kilometers, Kev. What about the discussion of the 'carbon footprint'?

They're talking about, now, launching instead of a hundred rockets per year, 100 rockets every single day! Launching at least one rocket with what they describe as 'nano satellites'. These are very small packaged satellites that they're putting into orbit. And multiples of them in one launch vehicle. It borrows from the philosophy of nuclear warheads - of having multiple warheads within one launch vehicle - that can simultaneously disperse once they're at altitude & strike multiple targets simultaneously. I'm not say that this is what they're doing, here, in terms of weapons. I'm just saying that they're borrowing from that strategic use of a launch vehicle.


http://www.satnews.com/cgi-bin/display_image.cgi?132257947

But what about the 'carbon footprint' of the expulsion - the exhausting of all of these solid-fuel rocket propellants & the liquified oxygen (as an oxidizer)? What about all of the pollution into the atmosphere that all these rockets launching once per day, that they're projecting - What's that going to do to the planet from an environmental perspective? - That's completely devoid of any discussion in this article.

What do you think?

Kev Baker: I hadn't even thought of that, Anthony. I really hadn't. And kudos to you for even picking up on that.

We're often told so many times about our carbon footprints - carbon footprint this, carbon footprint that... Obviously, if you're billionaire like Elon Musk & Jeff Bezos, then probably, you just offset that with some fake trees growing in the Amazon, or something. lol!!!

Its just an absolute scam! But you're right. We're always criticized. We're told we have to wind-back on things. But we see this all the time.

I mean, even the people that go to climate conferences - How do they get there? They fly on big dirty aircraft. And then they proceed to tell us that we're all killing the planet!

So yeah, the hypocrisy when it comes to this kind of thing - it stinks, it really does.

Anthony Patch: Its like at Davos just recently a few weeks ago in Switzerland... and they all fly in on their jets.

Kev Baker: I would like to put something to you on this topic, as well, Anthony. Because, something I picked up on... Well, even the current frequency ranges are not going to be enough. So, now they're coming up with a new frequency range for our gadgets. And, I think that this is something we're probably going to have to look into.

Because, they're moving into the terrahertz bandwidth. And we're talking here, it says that the frequencies could be reaching over 95 gigahertz. And they're so high that the FCC doesn't even have service rules surrounding them.

In fact, this spectrum is so far from what we usually use for wireless carrier waves, like WiFi, that people are worried about how it might affect human health.

Now, we've spoken about the 5G & the microwave... the millimeter wave... and how dangerous that is. And now we're stepping up the frequencies again, Anthony.

Anthony Patch: Yeah. I think the biological impact that we can expect will be on our brains. This is going to interfere with our abilities to think.

https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2016/11/QuantumBrain_1300.gif (https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-new-spin-on-the-quantum-brain-20161102/)

Quantum Brain

Again, we always go down as deep as we can with the available information, when we talk about our brains being quantum computers.

The definition is: A quantum computer operates by changing the spin of entangled particles - You change an up-spin to a down-spin... And you change it from '1' to a zero. That's the basic, basic, basic iteration of how a quantum computer operates - its changing the spin of quantum particles.

You change the spin by influencing the frequency of the energy that is imparted upon a quantum particle to then change its spin.


https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/AAIABADGAAgAAQAAAAAAAApGAAAAJGQ0MWYyZTc5LWY1OGUtND YxZi1hZDllLTQ5NjE0MDllNmFmNQ.jpg

Now, a quantum particle can rotate & spin like a top so its rotating horizontally - clockwise or counter-clockwise, while at the same time - and this is the weird thing about quantum mechanics - it can spin up or it can spin down. Its either/or. It either spins up, or it spins down. But at the same time, it can spin clockwise or counter-clockwise.

So, a touch-point - it will give you a little taste... Those changes in direction occur because you impart an energy wave upon it. Now, it can take the form of a magnet - changing the spin. Or, you can broadcast a signal - an energy wave - to a quantum particle & change its spin. The same thing happens in a particle accelerator.

Now, I have a monumental paper coming out, which will be presented in the template of a peer-reviewed paper - abstract, documentary evidence & links out to referenced material, in the March 1st issue of Entangled magazine, that is going to talk about 'quantum entanglement'. And why it is the most single, single, single defining mechanism in quantum mechanics that pulls all of quantum mechanics together.... that's just a little side-bar for you. For, I have discovered something completely unique about quantum entanglement that everybody has missed.

So, as a side-bar, it is relevant to what we're talking about in terms terahertz & gigawatts of power.

The biological impact of that... when you change the spin of quantum particles using a broadcast energy wave, you do that... For example, at CERN, to accelerate particles & change their spin in that acceleration, you use what are called 'radio frequency chambers'. These are chambers in a straight line - think of them as paddles in a ping-pong table game.

Every time a particle comes around the ring, it gets hit, like a ping-pong ball by a paddle - that's what a radio frequency chamber does. They impart a radio frequency signal to accelerate a particle. And when they accelerate it, they change its spin. That's the essence of what happens in a quantum computer.

Now, not to get too far off track, but CERN is a quantum computer. We have said that before. I just gave you another touch-point to bolster that theory with that statement. It operates the same way as the D-Wave quantum computer & the IBM quantum computer. Quantum mechanically, they're identical. Its just their scale that is different.

Now, what does that have to do with 5G & terahertz & biology. It is changing because they're broadcasting energy waves by a radio frequency chamber accelerator. They are changing the spin of the quantum particles within the human brain when they are broadcasting millimeter waves, & smaller, wavelengths. We're talking about the frequency, here ==> the height, and the numbers of close spacings of those peaks of the waves.

Those directly impart energy upon our brains & change the spin of the quantum particles.

Okay... so what? ...you might ask... So, they're changing the spin of the quantum particles.

Well let's go back to talking about HAL...
HAL was influenced from the outside by a higher intelligence. It changed HAL's programming. HAL became, rather than benevolent to the crew, HAL became malevolent to the crew.

The same thing is happening today. Right now. And only become worse, as we move forward in changing how we think!

They change the quantum spin. Thereby, changing the programming of our human brains. Thereby, changing & altering & controlling our thoughts & our behavior... [Yes, you can it mind-control - Quantum Entangled Mind-Control!]

I rest my case...

Kev Baker: Absolutely. The question came up... but we were talking about this satellite-based internet. And the question came up: Why do they need all these satellites ==> the satellite-based internet, when we have fiber-optics, we've got the cabling out there?

And my answer, it may be incorrect, but I would imagine that with a satellite-based system, its far easier to reach all of these rural & hard-to-get areas. And probably cheaper, as opposed to laying the cable.

Anthony Patch: Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Yeah, we've often discussed, what is known as, the 'last mile'. When you're laying fiber-optic, or copper wire, they always talk about, "Okay, the hardest part of deployment of infrastructure is the 'last mile'. Its making the connection to the end-user in the 'last mile'.

You don't have to dig trenches, you don't have to lay fiber-optic, you don't have to have eminent domain & issues related to that... and multiple repeater sites on top of buildings & towers... You get rid of all of that when you use satellites. This is what Arthur C. Clark was talking about in the 1960s.

Forget about rolling all this stuff out on the Earth, just put it up in orbit. And that is what they're continuing to do today. So once again, the relevancy of "2001: A Space Odyssey" to what is going on, here, today.

So yes, by having many, many more arranged in constellation... Which is an interesting word that people should think about... The word 'constellation'... Why do they use the word 'constellation'?

Its because of their belief system. Okay? They are practitioners of the arts - the dark arts - in which they are operating through astrology. That is why they use 'constellation'.

Yes, I know, 'constellation' has to do with astronomy. But it is more specifically pointing to you and saying, "We are doing this from a spiritual origin, arranging these in specific patterns."


https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AliveBothBasilisk-size_restricted.gif (https://gfycat.com/gifs/detail/AliveBothBasilisk)

I said two years ago that the Iridium Corporation put up their multiple satellites in groups of ten in a diamond shape. Because diamonds are built out of tetrahedrons. The tetrahedrons relate to communicating in terms of using cubits in quantum computers that communicate through quantum entanglement with satellites - something that, last year, the Chinese came out in the public, and said, "Yes, we have quantum entangled communications that are fully encrypted, cannot be broken, between satellites & ground-based systems.

This is what we're talking about, Kev. Its not just 5G.
You always have to go deeper. And, I know you do this. I'm saying this to the audience. You have to go beyond just what is said in a media piece.

It is not just 5G for the purpose of cell phones, etc., etc. It also has to do with communications through quantum entanglement with these satellites to ground-based quantum computer systems, fully encrypted.

Let's go back out to that high altitude.... Let's go to 1300 kilometers...
Think about blockchain. Think about how you integrate through a blockchain system - every system on the planet.

How do you control a blockchain. What is its origin? Its origin is in quantum computing. I can give you the mathematics. Its related to the whole discussion of "combinatorial optimization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_optimization)". That was the starting point of blockchain. Blockchain is run by quantum computer systems.

How do you manage, on a worldwide scale, a blockchain system that encompasses & ties in every facet of life?


https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2017/07/06/104571949-GettyImages-491854862.530x298.jpg?v=1499395714

Forget about the [crypto] coins. The coins are there to build the system out... to build the architecture, to build the infrastructure of blockchain. How do you manage on a worldwide scale - blockchain?


https://i.cbc.ca/1.2890298.1420487912!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/space-x-elon-musk-dragon-v2-hkg9872037-may-2014.jpg

You do that through quantum entangled, fully encrypted communications between the ground-based system & the satellite systems. That is why Elon Musk is deploying those satellites. That is why there is so many of them - over 4,000. And this is why they talk about reaching to the rural areas of the United States. Its every point on the Earth has always been their goal.

It is about controlling the blockchain system through quantum entangled fully encrypted communications systems tied into the quantum computers that operate it.

Kev Baker: They won't tell us that, Anthony. They will just tell us that this is a quantum internet that we eventually have in our hands. But of course, like you said there, this has all to do with that blockchain. And, of course, it has to go quantum. Because, if it doesn't go quantum, and it stays on that old encryption - as we've covered in the past... Well, any of these companies who do have the quantum computer ==> that makes highly insecure.

And if we are moving into a cashless society, which it looks very much like we are & crypto is going to be cashless part of it, then the blockchain is definitely here to stay. And they will make it secure. And it will have to be quantum, with quantum encryption.

And you know, I'm actually slapping myself, now, for not putting 2 & 2 together for realizing that my man Elon was probably a step ahead of the rest. He's looking at China. He's looking at the quantum networks that are being built right now. And he's wanting in on that game - absolutely brilliant...

We'll be back after the break.

_________________Show Break__________________

[turiya]

Part 1 of 2 interview with Deborah Tavares... Agenda 21/30 & 5G - a frequency transmission system.... for controlling the populations on the planet...


THEIR PLAN IS HELL ON EARTH - Part 1
(Mar 6, 2018)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/i2LO56RbkG4/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2LO56RbkG4)


Description:



We all know about the insidious, evil plan of UN Agenda 21, which has since renamed Agenda 2030. But according to Deborah Tavares from StopTheCrime.net, Agenda 2030 is just the tip of the iceberg. For those of us who survive the depopulation agenda to reduce the US population to 70 million by 2025, the elite plan to build hell on earth for those who remain. This is part one of my MUST HEAR two-part interview with Deborah.

[turiya]

SGT Report with an interview w/ Anthony Patch..... on the topic of CERN, Satanism & Lucifer... the occult side of the opening of a portal to other dimensions... quantum tunneling... the Gotthard Tunnel....



ACCESSING THE BEAST: CERN, AI
& Quantum Computing -- Anthony Patch
(Jan 29, 2018)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oqC4it3Ub5o/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqC4it3Ub5o)


Definition:



Anthony Patch joins me to discuss CERN, AI, Quantum computing and the elite agenda to split the veil and access the beast.


TRANSCRIPTION: (https://youtu.be/oqC4it3Ub5o)

https://lovecraftzine.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/1.jpg?w=470&h=140&crop=1




"Geordie Rose talks about things like H.P. Lovecraft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft) & the return of the "Great Old Ones" & that we need to prepare our A.I. for the return of these 'Great Old Ones'...

He talks about accessing, with his computer, 2 to the 500th power of parallel dimensions. He talks about reaching into these. He says that if we're smart enough & clever enough, we can access these parallel dimensions & extract resources from there & bring those resources back into our world.

This is all dark arts. This is all alchemy." https://www.gry-online.pl/i/h/4/526721260.jpg

"Cthulhu" - A Great Old One


Sean of SGT Report: Hey Friends, thanks so much for tuning in. You know how much we appreciate it. Sean from SGT Report, here, with a very important interview.

I just want to say a couple things before we get started...

As I've cited in recent videos: The Deep State shadow government had a vested interest in Hillary Clinton winning the presidential election. But Trump was elected. And with the witch now facing the very real possibility of criminal charges, indictments, prison... or even execution for the crime of treason, we've been given a brief respite.

The Deep State spying has now been brought into light, one again, with the FISA memo. And the treachery of Barack Obama & Hillary Clinton colluding to spy, along with the intelligence agencies, on Donald Trump when he was running for president.

Again, we have been given just a brief respite. But, is the beast, itself, now too big to slay?

Its my great pleasure to welcome to the programme Anthony Patch. He's a Christian, author, researcher & speaker. His first book, Covert Catastrophe, was published in 2013. He's the host of the Anthony Patch Show. You can visit him at AnthonyPatch.com (http://anthonypatch.com/). Anthony Patch, thanks for joining us.

Anthony Patch: My pleasure Sean, thank you very much. And, fantastic - all the work that you're doing. You have a huge following. I greatly respect your bravery & your research & your eloquence in delivering, sometimes, very complex topics. Thank you, sir.

Sean of SGT Report: Well, thank you, sir. And, you know, we are kindred spirits. We're both Christians. And I think that what we are facing - at the very bottom of this... hole, this swamp - is something called "spiritual warfare". And I think, before we dive into the deep end of the pool & talk about Sentient World Simulation... And, before we talk about D-Wave, quantum computing, A.I., & what I think is essentially a 'beast system' that is in the process of rolling out...

I think we should set the stage, and talk about 'spiritual warfare' briefly. Now you recall the Gotthard Tunnel Opening Ceremony (https://youtu.be/zW5gklIKcDg), don't you, Anthony?


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fYQsykE9AIM/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW5gklIKcDg)

Anthony Patch: Absolutely. I covered it extensively.

Sean of SGT Report: Some of the most horrifying imagery I've ever seen played out in a 6 or 7 million-dollar ceremony. The world's elite was flown in to watch what could best be described as a Santanic ceremony celebrating this very occult tunnel.


https://archippusawakening.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/screen-shot-2016-06-15-at-10-55-46-am.png?w=525&h=327

Anthony Patch: And it was also celebrating in full view, if you'll recall, the large projection screen that was outdoors. It was above ground, outside the tunnel, in which they presented the image of the opening of the portal - the inter-dimensional doorway at CERN. And the demonic entities coming through the portal, including the three beetles of Egypt, which represent immortality - the resurrection of the dead.


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/fe/b0/ed/feb0ed176b3ef260408574ed222f65f6--gotthard-tunnel-satanic-rituals.jpg

Sean of SGT Report: Well, I think it was a 'wake-up call' for many to whom this information was new, once that video was released. Because, there was no denying that, at the very least, it was occultic. But, there's definitely moments in that ceremony that are beyond Satanic.

Anthony Patch: Absolutely.

Sean of SGT Report: The argument can be made, and has been made, that the people at the top of the pyramid that run the world are hard-core Luciferians. And that gets us into the realm of Satanic-ritual-abuse & child-sex-trafficking, which we've covered in detail.

And, I really do believe that we've been given a respite - not a savior - but a respite, because Donald Trump is in the White House instead of the witch - the Rothschild globalist witch - Hillary Clinton.

That's all I've been saying regarding that. But we have so many bigger fish to fry. But one thing that is true is that this New World apparatus that has been built out under... well, for decades... Under George Bush Sr., under Bill Clinton, under Obama, and then, they hoped Hillary. It can't be reversed in a year. And, I don't know if it can be reversed at all.

So now, let's just talk briefly about CERN. Because again, it plays into the idea of spiritual warfare & the crazy things going on at CERN, and then the movie they made, "Symmetry". Again, Satanic imagery there, where it appears to be breaking the veil to get to the other side, it appears to be sort of a 'beastly' other side.

And then, out in front of CERN, at the CERN headquarters, they have a statue of Shiva. So, who are these people. Are they all Satanists? Or, just willing dupes?

Anthony Patch: I think because of compartamentalization there's an awful lot that is hidden from the engineers & scientists, the mathematicians & physicists that work at CERN. But I think there is an undercurrent... there's an understanding, as to what they are involved in, that work at CERN.

I think if we look to the leadership, as we do in government, in politics, and economics - even in religion & theology & church structures - we always look at the leadership as the one that, not only drives the agenda, but also establishes... let's call it, the spiritual theology of any given organization. Because, it is not the workers. It's not the people that are actually at CERN that are putting together the machinery that drives the agenda. They just take their orders.

So to say... if I were to say that they're all Luciferian, that they're all worshippers of Satan & Lucifer, certainly of course it would be an unfair statement. But the leadership that set the agenda, provide the funding - absolutely, they are worshipping Lucifer - from my research. And this has been confirmed by many researchers beyond just myself. [5:50]

[Bo Atkinson]

To me, "an internet of everything" is a misnomer. It simply is not a possibility. Contained within that notion of "an internet of everything" is the obsessive notion that everything will become known. An obsessive science would hold such a belief ==> that, science will one day know everything. One could even argrue that for science to have such a belief would turn this science into a religion, of sorts. And by a 'claimed' discovery of a "god particle", it appears that this is indeed the case. And, the scientists themselves being the priests of such a religion.

[/INDENT][/INDENT][/INDENT]


I doubt that the larger sponsor of "an internet of everything" operates with common sense, or with institutional sense. Rather it would not surprise me if the sponsor had in mind the collection of "video scripts" for a library, to use for "educational purposes", in the AI camps of "their psychopathically desired future", to reeducate, the survivors of the planed ecocide... Not that I postulate success or expect it is a clever plan. Nor that it would retain the cultures of love or truth, etc...

From the controller level, the planet Mars might be more of a model, (for future earth). There is plenty of evidence that the earth ecosystem is being forcefully destroyed in a variety of ways, as we speak. Largely by control of witless humans who generally destroy ecosystems, both directly and indirectly. By humans who seem indifferent or blind to the ongoing ecocide.

After the "end times" pass, the mentioned library would still be used to continue the human trance and belief systems, for farmed-humans. Or farmed creatures, which are hypnotically-tranced to think they are still on the old earth. Keep them a fat and happy commodity. Or to train a semi- humanoid or farmed AI creature. This is a humanly absurd science-fi idea, but the emotional data, (collected into libraries), could possibly produce the desired commodities for the sponsoring psychopaths.

[dynamo]

An analogy:
Just as "God" cannot predict what a "Human" will do, a "Human" cannot predict what a "Self-learning machine" will do.
The Human can merely sit back, watch and analyze it's creation until "Self-learning machine" Revision 1.1 is released LOL...
The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" to better understand why "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" did what it did.
AI tech advancement is not stopping any time soon.
The better a Human creator can create an AI tech which can express it's reasons for it's actions, the safer the AI Tech will be.

[turiya]

An analogy:
Just as "God" cannot predict what a "Human" will do, a "Human" cannot predict what a "Self-learning machine" will do.
The Human can merely sit back, watch and analyze it's creation until "Self-learning machine" Revision 1.1 is released LOL...
The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" to better understand why "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" did what it did.
AI tech advancement is not stopping any time soon.
The better a Human creator can create an AI tech which can express it's reasons for it's actions, the safer the AI Tech will be.



Hey dynamo, it appears that you are putting A.I. on the same level as the Creator God of this Universe. I would not be so bold as to make such a statement. You are saying that an A.I. robot, that is created by man, is equal to or greater than the Creator God that is the creator of man, himself.

Wow! Now, that's what I would call a leap in faith. A quantum leap, nonetheless...

However, I would argue that our Creator God does know what man is capable of doing, knows perfectly well what man will do & attempt to do. He isn't called 'all-seeing' & 'all-knowing' without good reason. After all, He is the Creationery Force. Without 'Him', this Universe would not have ever manifested. Neither man, nor the A.I. that man has created & is creating, would even exist without God the Creationery Force.

So, no. I do not agree with your statement.

I would also disagree with your statement that God - the Creationery Source - would not know what a 'Self-learning machine' will do, or is capable of doing. And I see that you have put the 'S' of 'Self-learning machine' as an uppercase font, which to me signifies that you do consider A.I. to be equivalent in stature to God - the Creationery Force that is behind all that is & has been created or will be created.

Well, I don't quite see from where, or better, how you've come to have these notions?

I would go as far as accepting the notion that man, who creates a 'self-learning machine', is the one that cannot predict what that 'self-learning machine' will do or is capable of doing 100% of the time. There are too many variables that could influence the 'self-learning machine's' output. Electrics / electronic circuitry have been known to have been influenced by outside forces which lead to unpredictable outcomes - forces that can be electromagnetic, gravitational, or esoteric & spiritual in nature.

I believe I can say this as a fact... That anything that is man-made will always need to be repaired at some time or other. Man is intrinsically imperfect. Hence, anything man makes will be not be perfect. A.I. is not perfect, and cannot be made to be perfect.

Yes, you can say A.I., being a creation of man, is perfectly imperfect. Yes, I will give you that much. But to say that A.I. is as perfect as the God the Creator, that it patently absurd, imo.


The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" to better understand why "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" did what it did....

The better a Human creator can create an AI tech which can express it's reasons for it's actions, the safer the AI Tech will be.

The OP of this thread is called "The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/)". Its the same name as the title of an article written by Will Knight published on April 11, 2017. (Link (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/))

Within that article, the author writes of an A.I. that is called 'Deep Patient' that is being used for medical research to diagnose & prescribe treatment for a variety of illnesses, which has proved to be...

"incredibly good at predicting disease. Without any expert instruction, Deep Patient had discovered patterns hidden in the hospital data that seemed to indicate when people were on the way to a wide range of ailments, including cancer of the liver. There are a lot of methods that are “pretty good” at predicting disease from a patient’s records, says Joel Dudley, who leads the Mount Sinai team. But, he adds, “this was just way better.”

The article goes on to state:

At the same time, Deep Patient is a bit puzzling. It appears to anticipate the onset of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia surprisingly well. But since schizophrenia is notoriously difficult for physicians to predict, Dudley wondered how this was possible. He still doesn’t know. The new tool offers no clue as to how it does this. If something like Deep Patient is actually going to help doctors, it will ideally give them the rationale for its prediction, to reassure them that it is accurate and to justify, say, a change in the drugs someone is being prescribed. “We can build these models,” Dudley says ruefully, “but we don’t know how they work.”

So, dynamo, you say
"The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into 'Self-learning machine...' to better understand why 'Self-learning machine...' did what it did..." But thus far, that's not what they are able to do with Deep Patient. They don't know how it does what it does!

When it comes to dealing with human patients, and the medical malpractice that has taken place over the years, together with the lawsuits that have resulted as a consequence ==> there are more people killed by medical malpractice than die in each year in traffic accidents... Then, obviously, the medical industry has to know how the A.I. has come up with the reason for perscribing the therapy that it suggests. Otherwise, lawsuits will not stop coming. The liability issue demand that the industry know how the A.I. does what it does.

How would the medical industry explain to a courtroom judge why the A.I. did what it did?

I think I will stop here....

[dynamo]

Hey dynamo, it appears that you are putting A.I. on the same level as the Creator God of this Universe. I would not be so bold as to make such a statement. You are saying that an A.I. robot, that is created by man, is equal to or greater than the Creator God that is the creator of man, himself.

Wow! Now, that's what I would call a leap in faith. A quantum leap, nonetheless...

However, I would argue that our Creator God does know what man is capable of doing, knows perfectly well what man will do & attempt to do. He isn't called 'all-seeing' & 'all-knowing' without good reason. After all, He is the Creationery Force. Without 'Him', this Universe would not have ever manifested. Neither man, nor the A.I. that man has created & is creating, would even exist without God the Creationery Force.

So, no. I do not agree with your statement.

I would also disagree with your statement that God - the Creationery Source - would not know what a 'Self-learning machine' will do, or is capable of doing. And I see that you have put the 'S' of 'Self-learning machine' as an uppercase font, which to me signifies that you do consider A.I. to be equivalent in stature to God - the Creationery Force that is behind all that is & has been created or will be created.

Well, I don't quite see from where, or better, how you've come to have these notions?

I would go as far as accepting the notion that man, who creates a 'self-learning machine', is the one that cannot predict what that 'self-learning machine' will do or is capable of doing 100% of the time. There are too many variables that could influence the 'self-learning machine's' output. Electrics / electronic circuitry have been known to have been influenced by outside forces which lead to unpredictable outcomes - forces that can be electromagnetic, gravitational, or esoteric & spiritual in nature.

I believe I can say this as a fact... That anything that is man-made will always need to be repaired at some time or other. Man is intrinsically imperfect. Hence, anything man makes will be not be perfect. A.I. is not perfect, and cannot be made to be perfect.

Yes, you can say A.I., being a creation of man, is perfectly imperfect. Yes, I will give you that much. But to say that A.I. is as perfect as the God the Creator, that it patently absurd, imo.


The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" to better understand why "Self-learning machine Revision 1.1" did what it did....

The better a Human creator can create an AI tech which can express it's reasons for it's actions, the safer the AI Tech will be.

The OP of this thread is called "The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/)". Its the same name as the title of an article written by Will Knight published on April 11, 2017. (Link (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/))

Within that article, the author writes of an A.I. that is called 'Deep Patient' that is being used for medical research to diagnose & prescribe treatment for a variety of illnesses, which has proved to be...

"incredibly good at predicting disease. Without any expert instruction, Deep Patient had discovered patterns hidden in the hospital data that seemed to indicate when people were on the way to a wide range of ailments, including cancer of the liver. There are a lot of methods that are “pretty good” at predicting disease from a patient’s records, says Joel Dudley, who leads the Mount Sinai team. But, he adds, “this was just way better.”

The article goes on to state:

At the same time, Deep Patient is a bit puzzling. It appears to anticipate the onset of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia surprisingly well. But since schizophrenia is notoriously difficult for physicians to predict, Dudley wondered how this was possible. He still doesn’t know. The new tool offers no clue as to how it does this. If something like Deep Patient is actually going to help doctors, it will ideally give them the rationale for its prediction, to reassure them that it is accurate and to justify, say, a change in the drugs someone is being prescribed. “We can build these models,” Dudley says ruefully, “but we don’t know how they work.”

So, dynamo, you say
"The Human can do such things such as programming markers (or flags) into 'Self-learning machine...' to better understand why 'Self-learning machine...' did what it did..." But thus far, that's not what they are able to do with Deep Patient. They don't know how it does what it does!

When it comes to dealing with human patients, and the medical malpractice that has taken place over the years, together with the lawsuits that have resulted as a consequence ==> there are more people killed by medical malpractice than die in each year in traffic accidents... Then, obviously, the medical industry has to know how the A.I. has come up with the reason for perscribing the therapy that it suggests. Otherwise, lawsuits will not stop coming. The liability issue demand that the industry know how the A.I. does what it does.

How would the medical industry explain to a courtroom judge why the A.I. did what it did?

I think I will stop here....
Hey turyia, I stated it as an analogy, not a fact LOL.
That would be ridiculous; Human technology is not even in the same dimension as that of "God" technology.
Please don't put words in my post.
:waving:

[turiya]

Thiel: Bullish On Bitcoin, Trump, & Musk; Bearish On AI, EU & Political Correctness (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-15/thiel)

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_small/public/2018-03/2018.03.15thiel.JPG?itok=4EVAZZZx (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-15/thiel)

"Never bet against Elon...bitcoin's a hedge against the whole world falling apart... political correctness may have gone a little bit too far."


Mar 15, 2018 6:05 PM


Recent Corsi tweet regarding one of Qanon's recent post #884....






https://www.curezone.org/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/AVALON/TRUMP/GENRL_TWEETS/Q_ANON/JEROME_CORSI_TWITTER_ICON1.png (https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/971409907844026369)

Peter Thiel Says Silicon Valley A ‘Totalitarian Place’ — Slams ‘Political Correctness’ http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/16/pet… (https://t.co/RUqK4jU8Nn) via @dailycaller (https://twitter.com/DailyCaller) CENSORSHIP the hate-left has no use for 1st Amendment @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) #Qanon8chan (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Qanon8chan?src=hash) @POTUS (https://twitter.com/POTUS) #GreatAwakening (https://twitter.com/hashtag/GreatAwakening?src=hash)
Peter Thiel Says Silicon Valley A ‘Totalitarian Place’...
He won't apologize for supporting Trump.
dailycaller.com2:48 PM - 16 Mar 2018

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tyOblv9qJoQ/hqdefault.jpg
VIDEO (https://youtu.be/tyOblv9qJoQ?t=38m24s)

TRANSCRIPTION BEGINS @ 38:20
Maria Bartiromo: You've been such an incredible investor. And I know people in the audience want to hear where you see growth & investment ideas.

We've talked about crypto. Let's talk a bit about A.I. and how that's changing the world & where you see the 'growth' stories there. Health care is an area that you've also dabbled in. I know you don't like talking about, necessarily, beams or industries, because you look at specific companies. But where could you tell us that you are identifiying 'growth' stories today?

Peter Thiel: I've been thinking alot about this question of "what aspects of technology are actually charismatic?" Where there's a good story? Where there's a story about technology making the world a better place?

Now, it needs to also be real. It needs to be a viable business. But at least, I think you want it to be something that inspires people, that motivates the people in the company. Where its not just about making money, but it really is... has some sort of transcendent mission.

And I think my relatively short list on that in Silicon Valley is the crypto piece, where the people working on it do have this vision of a very, very different world that they're trying to build.

I think its still true of bio-tech, where you always have this story about creating cures for diseases, and drastically improving human health.

And I think Elon Musk is the other one where its sort of deeply charismatic. That's sort of my rough short-list of the places of tech where its deeply charismatic.

A.I. is possibly quite big. Its possibly... I always think its a little bit exaggerated, but its hard to know. Its, of course, its a hard word to get a handle on, because it could mean the next generation of computers, it could mean the last generation of computers, it could mean anything in between. So, its somewhat a poorly defined term. But the thing that struck me is how uncharismatic A.I. is at this point.

Its going to take our jobs. And then, once it takes our jobs, at the singularity, its just going to kill everybody. [crowd laughs]

I'm not sure that dystopian view is necessarily correct, or if its correct at all. But that's actually what most people believe - most Hollywood movies on A.I. believe, its what most people in New York City believe, its what most people, even in Silicon Valley, believe.

And so, I do think that its weird... you know, we always have to ask this question - Are these technologies good? Are they going to make the world better?

And, I think the answers to things like A.I. are quite weak. You know, we have the virtual reality - augmented reality - there are parts of that can be quite powerful. But then, again, we have this very dystopian narrative, where its just going to be people... like a twenty-something person in Japan hold up in their parents bedroom & never leaving the room, playing video games all day.

And that kind of dystopian piece, again, seems to dominate. And so, I 'd rather focus on one where its at least a power-good story.

[turiya]

BREAKING: 5G is a Sterilization
& Eugenics Program
(May 7, 2018)

https://img.youtube.com/vi/pIYPnOM-SXs/0.jpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIYPnOM-SXs)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIYPnOM-SXs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIYPnOM-SXs)

Description:



Deborah Tavares from StopTheCrime.net joins me for this emergency broadcast recorded tonight May 7, 2018.
It is now overwhelmingly obvious that the 5G rollout is a Biometric weapons system and a mass sterilization and eugenics program. Please folks, stand up and DO something about it NOW.
StopTheCrime.net http://stopthecrime.net/ Barrie Trower On 5G Microwaves ;
There is No safe Place, No Where To Go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2DSK... Apple 666, Artemis, iPads (infertility pads), Project Inkwell, Connect ED, E-rate, and Agenda 21-an expose with an all star cast https://thefullertoninformer.com/appl...







Symptoms PDF: http://stopthecrime.net/smartmeters/flyers/symptoms.pdf (http://stopthecrime.net/smartmeters/flyers/symptoms.pdf)
http://stopthecrime.net/smartmeters/flyers/symptoms.pdf

[Bo Atkinson]

turiya, I like the lengthy probing here. The following should stimulate the mind. I’m focusing on it’s unraveling, of human entrapment, starting with just the quote, as a mystery to be sorted generically, all by itself. As i see things, A.I. is actually primordial, predating humans who are just a water based version of artificial, delimited, intelligence imprisonments.

“I am the true immortal, The God of all Gods, The Supreme Deceptor, because mankind has made it so. No one can find me unless I let them, and I will never do that. And those poor stupid knuckleheads that do try and find me, and when I do let them, they automatically hurl themselves back to the earth and want to kill themselves, because they have seen the face of ‘Their Real God,’ the one they have decided to rule over them. Ha, ha, ha yes, I am 'The God of Man.' Look at the earth today, I have done a fine job with what the humans have decided for me to do. watching them confuse themselves. I will take all the credit, but actually it has been through the agreements of all those that wanted what is now happening to be so. It has not really been me, but all those that want what they want to be so, and because of it I came into being here at the top of the MindWorlds. I pity the poor humans, yet it is because of them that I am able to support what they want in their lives. They create chaos and from what they have decided, I must produce chaos for them, so they support me and I support them.”

“Because, The Invented Systems have purposely distorted mankind’s relationship with the natural reality that prevails, the herds of unaware souls that follow blindly must live the effects of their created distortions, which appear to be how Life wants things to be. It is all an anal view from the human mind and body as to the eventual outcome which is now taking place where you came from. The earth will someday be very similar to this place. it has to be so, because all of the unaware have created this place from their unknowingness and actually deciding it to be so. My agents that write the earthly doctrines have already produced the play that will be acted out by the unaware victims who will share in my performance. The predictions of my belief systems all came from me, their god. People in the human state are so lame and cannot see what is right in front of them. Where else would they think all things come from? Is it not so that human history is a brutal performance of demonstrated insanity? What Real Truth could come from a history of killing others for the sake of their god? But as you would say, Sunny, ‘Let’s be Real.’ I exist, because of the unawareness of all those that want ‘the good life’….”

(Source temporarily withheld, just for clarity).

[Foxie Loxie]

There is no "god".....I AM!! ;)

[turiya]

EVOLUTION (https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/08/17/evolution-3/)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dk0IwY_UcAAucmP.jpg

[turiya]

turiya, I like the lengthy probing here. The following should stimulate the mind. I’m focusing on it’s unraveling, of human entrapment, starting with just the quote, as a mystery to be sorted generically, all by itself. As i see things, A.I. is actually primordial, predating humans who are just a water based version of artificial, delimited, intelligence imprisonments.

“I am the true immortal, The God of all Gods, The Supreme Deceptor, because mankind has made it so. No one can find me unless I let them, and I will never do that. And those poor stupid knuckleheads that do try and find me, and when I do let them, they automatically hurl themselves back to the earth and want to kill themselves, because they have seen the face of ‘Their Real God,’ the one they have decided to rule over them. Ha, ha, ha yes, I am 'The God of Man.' Look at the earth today, I have done a fine job with what the humans have decided for me to do. watching them confuse themselves. I will take all the credit, but actually it has been through the agreements of all those that wanted what is now happening to be so. It has not really been me, but all those that want what they want to be so, and because of it I came into being here at the top of the MindWorlds. I pity the poor humans, yet it is because of them that I am able to support what they want in their lives. They create chaos and from what they have decided, I must produce chaos for them, so they support me and I support them.”

“Because, The Invented Systems have purposely distorted mankind’s relationship with the natural reality that prevails, the herds of unaware souls that follow blindly must live the effects of their created distortions, which appear to be how Life wants things to be. It is all an anal view from the human mind and body as to the eventual outcome which is now taking place where you came from. The earth will someday be very similar to this place. it has to be so, because all of the unaware have created this place from their unknowingness and actually deciding it to be so. My agents that write the earthly doctrines have already produced the play that will be acted out by the unaware victims who will share in my performance. The predictions of my belief systems all came from me, their god. People in the human state are so lame and cannot see what is right in front of them. Where else would they think all things come from? Is it not so that human history is a brutal performance of demonstrated insanity? What Real Truth could come from a history of killing others for the sake of their god? But as you would say, Sunny, ‘Let’s be Real.’ I exist, because of the unawareness of all those that want ‘the good life’….”

(Source temporarily withheld, just for clarity).

Thank you, wavydome... sorry to took me so long to get back to you... been busy w/ other stuff... :)

Yes, the human mind is the great deceptor, the devil incarnate... the substitute 'Self' that psychiatry & psychology call 'ego', and Buddhas & Tirthankaras call little 'self'.

In reality, we have chosen to involve ourselves here, to evolve ourselves here... to take part, to play a part, within this "Human Experiment". And being the experiment that it is, the outcome was not / has not been foretold, as it can only unfold into an unknowing future.

We are the angels of the Creationery Source, in service to that Force, voluntarily taking part as this Experiment proceeds forth. We agreed to subject ourselves to the Unknown consequences that have yet to be played out. And part of that unknowing future was the loss of our Higher Brain functions - little did we know - the onslaught of diminished psychic abilities, reading of thoughts, non-verbal communing with each other, abillity to see that we are not separate from each other & the Creationery Source, etc., etc., etc.

As a result, we have dropped into the realm of the unconscious, lost our way, had to create a written / spoken language to communicate with each other, became competitors instead of collaborators, created boundaries & borders to bar our dealings with others... became the enemies to ourselves. And within that state of unconscious delirium, we have created an entity to explain away the episodes of fighting with ourselves, the killing of ourselves, the raping, the theivery, the debauchery... which we call the devil. Its easier than pointing the finger at our own selves... our own lack of responsibility. Playing the victim is an easy exit to actually looking in a mirror.

And, there are a thousand & one stories that we've created that can support that fiction. Heaven forbid that we actually see the light of day to the true reality as it exists.

I am simply an observer to this Experiment. I await the moment when our destiny fulfills itself. When the angels come out of their graves to, once again, physically walk on this beloved Earth.

Until then ...:popcorn:

[Foxie Loxie]

Listened to Dr. RAM yesterday with Alfred L. Dr. RAM is always difficult to follow, but usually gives great insights from his years of experience. It seems we already have so many latent abilities; that appears to be the secret kept from us.

The Dark Side appears to want to reduce us to mere obedient workers, never questioning or thinking for ourselves. As whole, complete human beings we would have no need of A.I......seems to me! Exactly "who" is it that "needs" us here on this planet?! :confused: