Global cooling expert proven right

[shiva777]

Global cooling expert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwyjsJJrr2I&feature=player_embedded#!

[shiva777]

Hot 'Climategate' debate: Scientists clash LIVE on RT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anHuOAXIl0M&feature=player_embedded

[Humble Janitor]

I don't think he's a "global cooling" expert.

More like someone that correctly predicted the weather by chance.

Now that the debunkers and skeptics have failed to debunk GW, they're turning to another method and that is GC. I'm not buying it.

[shiva777]

here is his website

http://weatheraction.com/

Thursday 30 Dec 2010
Welcome to WeatherAction - world leaders in long range weather and climate forecasting



The Climate Fools Day Meeting in Parliament Room 10 on Weds 27th Oct 2010.

- Marking the 2nd anniversary of the UK Parliament passing a Climate Act against nature (29th Oct 2008)

Piers Corbyn (centre) is being awarded the StairWay Press first annual Ernst-Georg Beck Award for Scientific Integrity and Competence (BASIC) by John O’Sullivan Author.

The meeting - “The necessity for Evidence-based Science & policy – Not the Carbon Con!” was supported by a simultaneous event in King George Square, Brisbane, Queensland and covered three times during the Day by Russia TV and an extensive array of websites around the world.

Speakers were: Jens Rodrup - Climate Sense Denmark; Rvd Philip Foster, Author While the Earth Endures - Climate The Long View; Piers Corbyn, Astrophysicist, WeatherAction - Why it’s not CO2 + Proper science predicts extreme weather events & Climate; Peter Gill, Physicist & Energy expert - Fictitious ‘tipping points’ + Facts about CO2; Christopher Booker, Telegraph Columnist - The most expensive Bill in history; Sammy Wilson DUP MP and Dr Ian Strangeways, Hydrologist + Expert on weather data. Apologies were received from Graham Stringer LAB MP, a scientist and a number of Tory MPs. Present & discussing afterwards included Gabe Rychert – Climate Realists; Graham Capper (chair) - Climate Sense UK + Copenhagen Climate Challenge; John Sanderson - Royal College of Science Association; & Hans Schreuder – ILoveMyCarbonDioxide.com. Videos, Reportage and links including details of the Ernst Georg Beck Award and Climate Sense Awards 2010: http://bit.ly/dbKz97 .

Piers Corbyn’s presentation showed the major advances in power and skill now achieved by his Solar-Lunar-Action-Technique (SLAT) of weather & climate forecasting which now includes the ability to predict from months ahead extreme events all over the world and changes in the Jet Stream such as those which caused the West Russian heatwave and the Pakistan super-deluges and floods and marked their ending in mid August 2010. In his presentation Piers showed a film of the double sunspot superfast solar coronal ejection on 14th August and the consequent Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance and the predicted jet stream disruption – See http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews10No31.pdf . For WeatherAction summer forecasts 2007, 08, 09 and winter forecasts 2008/9 and 09/10 which beat all-comers see http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews10No33.pdf

http://weatheraction.com/

[bashi]

Now that the debunkers and skeptics have failed to debunk GW, they're turning to another method and that is GC. I'm not buying it.

Please give examples

[HURRITT ENYETO]

I don't think he's a "global cooling" expert.

More like someone that correctly predicted the weather by chance.

Now that the debunkers and skeptics have failed to debunk GW, they're turning to another method and that is GC. I'm not buying it.


Hardly by chance .Piers Corbyn, Astrophysicist has spent years looking at the HARD DATA not fear mongering man made Global Warming Fraudsters. And his Solar-Lunar-Action-Technique (SLAT) of weather & climate forecasting which now includes the ability to predict from months ahead extreme events all over the world and changes in the Jet Stream such as those which caused the West Russian heatwave and the Pakistan super-deluges and floods and marked their ending in mid August 2010.

Not to mention he predicted the worst winter in decades in the U.K months ago and was laughed at.
It seems to me a climate model based on the Suns activity AND NOT MAN'S is a much better theory all round.

[Humble Janitor]

Please give examples

Perhaps I will post a paper I wrote on the people funding the climate denial machine. It might bother skeptics to be mentioned in the same breath as Koch Industries and Exxon-Mobil, two of the biggest funders of AGW denial.

Both sides are funded by people with lots of money. Both sides of the debate are meant to keep people at each others' throats while the whole point of it all goes ignored (SOMETHING is going on no matter what we call it).

¤=[Post Update]=¤


Hardly by chance .Piers Corbyn, Astrophysicist has spent years looking at the HARD DATA not fear mongering man made Global Warming Fraudsters. And his Solar-Lunar-Action-Technique (SLAT) of weather & climate forecasting which now includes the ability to predict from months ahead extreme events all over the world and changes in the Jet Stream such as those which caused the West Russian heatwave and the Pakistan super-deluges and floods and marked their ending in mid August 2010.

Not to mention he predicted the worst winter in decades in the U.K months ago and was laughed at.
It seems to me a climate model based on the Suns activity AND NOT MAN'S is a much better theory all round.

Many of what you call "fear mongering global warming fraudsters" are accredited scientists, some of who have studied climate models for decades.

Are they wrong all of a sudden just because you disagree with them?

Are they wrong all of a sudden just because Mr.Corbyn accurately predicted something that they missed?

[bashi]

Both sides are funded by people with lots of money.

There is only one side: The scientific facts. Do you know the facts or do you only want to discuss what "side" you are on?
Let me ask you about some facts:

How many temperature stations are used today to monitor the temperatures?
How many were used before 1991?
Which type of stations are not any more used and what is the effect of the missing stations on the calculated mean temperatures?
What is the percentual contribution of manmade CO2 to the globally produced CO2?
What is the general percentual contribution of CO2 to "Global Warming"?
or simply:
What comes first: The rise of global temperatures or the rise in CO2?

If you can`t answer for now, then do your own homework and find the correct answers.There is only ONE answer for each question.




Many of what you call "fear mongering global warming fraudsters" are accredited scientists, some of who have studied climate models for decades.
Are they wrong all of a sudden just because you disagree with them?
Are they wrong all of a sudden just because Mr.Corbyn accurately predicted something that they missed?

They are wrong because the "Global Warming" discussion is not about science, but about politics.
The lie has been boosted and perpetrated for long by political favourism and targeted funding politics.
The real scientists (not the puppets of the IPCC) know this for long. Here an article published 2003 in SCIENTIFIC REVIEW, one of the most prestigious papers to publish in:

"By varying the degree of detrending in the fluctuation analysis we obtain
also information about trends in the temperature records:

Most of the continental stations where we
observed significant trends are large cities where probably
the fast urban growth in the last century gave rise to temperature
increases.

The fact that we found it difficult to discern
warming trends at many stations that are not located in rapidly
developing urban areas may indicate that the actual increase
in global temperature caused by anthropogenic perturbation
is less pronounced than estimated in the last IPCC
Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report"
http://www.uni-giessen.de/physik/theorie/theorie3/publications/PRE-2003-1.pdf

That is enough for a scientist (and even a layman) to read, even if it is very carefully formulated. This has been published many years before the "Hockey-Stick" fraud and the criminal manipulation of temperture records were even known.

If you want to know the truth, then you have to do more than parroting, otherwise you will lose your independent thinking.
I wish you a good (independent) research year.
.

[Humble Janitor]

I find it funny that you accuse me of parroting when I have seen evidence of parroting the anti-AGW agenda on this forum, many times over.

I didn't even say what side I was on because it's still up for debate.

[bashi]

I find it funny that you accuse me of parroting when I have seen evidence of parroting the anti-AGW agenda on this forum, many times over.

I didn't even say what side I was on because it's still up for debate.

I simply try to encourage you to find your own answers. These you will need before you can debate anything.

[3optic]

Perhaps I will post a paper I wrote on the people funding the climate denial machine. It might bother skeptics to be mentioned in the same breath as Koch Industries and Exxon-Mobil, two of the biggest funders of AGW denial.


Interestingly, The Rockefeller family who's Standard Oil Trust spawned Exxon Mobile have made moves in the past to oust it's chairman and promote a move toward greening. Hope this is helpful for your research.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/business/27exxon.html?_r=2