Gemma13
16th February 2018, 05:48
NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-a---Very-Bad-Day---Scenario-for-some-elite-swamp-critters--Nov-2017-and-beyond-&p=1208306&viewfull=1#post1208306
2. This article came to my attention by someone mentioning how we could all feel betrayed by technology. It's a book excerpt by Julian Assange, about Eric Schmidt.
Again, with the mention of the Keyhole Technology, which Q has also mentioned.
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Thanks for this link - It took me deeper into aspects of political power and what technology is being used for in the 21st century.
Assange: Tying up the package are Jared Cohen and the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt.
I began to think of Schmidt as a brilliant but politically hapless Californian tech billionaire who had been exploited by the very US foreign-policy types he had collected to act as translators between himself and official Washington—a West Coast–East Coast illustration of the principal-agent dilemma.
I was wrong.
NGO’s – Non-Profit Non government Organizations
We have great intel revealing the healthy money making schemes and laundering from some of these high profile NGO’s i.e. Clinton Foundation, etc. But what really stuck out was the connection between these NGO’s (via global frontman Cohen directed by Schmidt, etc) and their pattern for revealing the “hidden in plain sight” global power of a “WORLD GOVERNMENT” masquerading as a non-government structure.
Makes traditional national government institutions look like kindergartners – or rather lower tier tools to implement the policies of the dictator partnerships controlling the “World Government”. Isn’t any wonder global investors/players are donating their “political campaign funds” to these institutions.
Barbara Gemmill champions this civil society movement in her (2002) Paper:
http://www.env-net.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/gemmill.pdf
The role of NGOs and Civil Society in Global Environmental Governance
International decisionmaking processes seek legitimacy through the involvement of civil society, yet formal mechanisms for NGO participation within the UN system remain limited. Ad-hoc civil society participation should be replaced by a strengthened, more formalized institutional structure for engagement. The chapter offers concrete suggestions for such measures, including:
[…] Assistance for the development of NGO networks; […] Creation of a comprehensive database of information and analysis at different geographic and political levels ]…]
INTRODUCTION : Globalization has considerably weakened traditional governance processes. Increasing global economic integration has reduced the power of national governments while granting other economic and political actors access to the world stage. The 1990s witnessed a dramatic increase in the involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance (Charnovitz, 1997).
CONCLUSION: Designing governance structures that draw NGOs into global-scale environmental problem solving, policymaking, and implementation remains an important global challenge. Civil society has much more to offer to intergovernmental processes. Indeed, the very legitimacy of international decisionmaking may depend on NGOs as a way to ensure connectedness to the publics around the world and substitute for true popular sovereignty, which international bodies, devoid of elected officials, lack.
A number of UN projects and programs are already benefiting from the contributions of NGOs in areas as varied as information collection and dissemination, policy implementation, monitoring and assessment, norm-setting, and policy development.
A revitalized global environmental governance system must facilitate both an expansion of these roles for NGOs and the development of better-defined processes of participation. […]
An improved governance structure would acknowledge the role of NGOs and other members of civil society and devise formal channels for participation. Ad-hoc acceptance of civil society participation should be replaced by institutional arrangements among UN member states, UN agencies, and NGOs.
ASSANGE: Cohen’s world seems to be one event like this after another: endless soirees for the cross-fertilization of influence between elites and their vassals, under the pious rubric of “civil society.” The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.
This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades. Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming “civil society” into a buyer’s market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm’s length. The last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.
I am all for a global platform that incorporates civil society as a contributing voice to government policy to help transition from the tight-knit small group power structures we have endured. Citizens have been provided with an unprecedented power tool via technology and it is deeply concerning that global dictators have powered ahead in their exploitation of this platform for their own self-serving interests and belief system that “only they know best”.
I imagine there are people with resources that could be summarizing and MAPPING this NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT structure (incorporating and expanding on the links provided by Assange) – anyone know of any leads/links?
Having a well structured map that reveals the current nefarious control of NGO’s would really empower citizens working in “honest humanitarianism” within these NGO’s in being able to a) recognize the dictatorship deception, and b) innovate strategies for immunity.
And I’m not read up enough to know about the mapping Q constantly refers to – is there a possibility that it could include mapping an NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE that has evolved significantly, and strategically positioned itself globally, over the past few decades thanks to the tech giants?
We know that Bill Clinton is the powerful international poster boy diplomat and Google-Schmidt is being revealed to be fundamentally instrumental – so perhaps we need to “Follow the Money” and “Follow the NGO’s”.
N.B. If this NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE has been covered in other threads please let me know.
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-a---Very-Bad-Day---Scenario-for-some-elite-swamp-critters--Nov-2017-and-beyond-&p=1208306&viewfull=1#post1208306
2. This article came to my attention by someone mentioning how we could all feel betrayed by technology. It's a book excerpt by Julian Assange, about Eric Schmidt.
Again, with the mention of the Keyhole Technology, which Q has also mentioned.
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Thanks for this link - It took me deeper into aspects of political power and what technology is being used for in the 21st century.
Assange: Tying up the package are Jared Cohen and the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt.
I began to think of Schmidt as a brilliant but politically hapless Californian tech billionaire who had been exploited by the very US foreign-policy types he had collected to act as translators between himself and official Washington—a West Coast–East Coast illustration of the principal-agent dilemma.
I was wrong.
NGO’s – Non-Profit Non government Organizations
We have great intel revealing the healthy money making schemes and laundering from some of these high profile NGO’s i.e. Clinton Foundation, etc. But what really stuck out was the connection between these NGO’s (via global frontman Cohen directed by Schmidt, etc) and their pattern for revealing the “hidden in plain sight” global power of a “WORLD GOVERNMENT” masquerading as a non-government structure.
Makes traditional national government institutions look like kindergartners – or rather lower tier tools to implement the policies of the dictator partnerships controlling the “World Government”. Isn’t any wonder global investors/players are donating their “political campaign funds” to these institutions.
Barbara Gemmill champions this civil society movement in her (2002) Paper:
http://www.env-net.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/gemmill.pdf
The role of NGOs and Civil Society in Global Environmental Governance
International decisionmaking processes seek legitimacy through the involvement of civil society, yet formal mechanisms for NGO participation within the UN system remain limited. Ad-hoc civil society participation should be replaced by a strengthened, more formalized institutional structure for engagement. The chapter offers concrete suggestions for such measures, including:
[…] Assistance for the development of NGO networks; […] Creation of a comprehensive database of information and analysis at different geographic and political levels ]…]
INTRODUCTION : Globalization has considerably weakened traditional governance processes. Increasing global economic integration has reduced the power of national governments while granting other economic and political actors access to the world stage. The 1990s witnessed a dramatic increase in the involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance (Charnovitz, 1997).
CONCLUSION: Designing governance structures that draw NGOs into global-scale environmental problem solving, policymaking, and implementation remains an important global challenge. Civil society has much more to offer to intergovernmental processes. Indeed, the very legitimacy of international decisionmaking may depend on NGOs as a way to ensure connectedness to the publics around the world and substitute for true popular sovereignty, which international bodies, devoid of elected officials, lack.
A number of UN projects and programs are already benefiting from the contributions of NGOs in areas as varied as information collection and dissemination, policy implementation, monitoring and assessment, norm-setting, and policy development.
A revitalized global environmental governance system must facilitate both an expansion of these roles for NGOs and the development of better-defined processes of participation. […]
An improved governance structure would acknowledge the role of NGOs and other members of civil society and devise formal channels for participation. Ad-hoc acceptance of civil society participation should be replaced by institutional arrangements among UN member states, UN agencies, and NGOs.
ASSANGE: Cohen’s world seems to be one event like this after another: endless soirees for the cross-fertilization of influence between elites and their vassals, under the pious rubric of “civil society.” The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.
This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades. Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming “civil society” into a buyer’s market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm’s length. The last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.
I am all for a global platform that incorporates civil society as a contributing voice to government policy to help transition from the tight-knit small group power structures we have endured. Citizens have been provided with an unprecedented power tool via technology and it is deeply concerning that global dictators have powered ahead in their exploitation of this platform for their own self-serving interests and belief system that “only they know best”.
I imagine there are people with resources that could be summarizing and MAPPING this NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT structure (incorporating and expanding on the links provided by Assange) – anyone know of any leads/links?
Having a well structured map that reveals the current nefarious control of NGO’s would really empower citizens working in “honest humanitarianism” within these NGO’s in being able to a) recognize the dictatorship deception, and b) innovate strategies for immunity.
And I’m not read up enough to know about the mapping Q constantly refers to – is there a possibility that it could include mapping an NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE that has evolved significantly, and strategically positioned itself globally, over the past few decades thanks to the tech giants?
We know that Bill Clinton is the powerful international poster boy diplomat and Google-Schmidt is being revealed to be fundamentally instrumental – so perhaps we need to “Follow the Money” and “Follow the NGO’s”.
N.B. If this NGO WORLD GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE has been covered in other threads please let me know.
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/