Tintin
19th February 2018, 11:33
Incredible pandemic hoax from the Ministry of Truth
"By declaring Swine Flu a "global pandemic," and at the same time redefining and diluting the understood meaning of the word "pandemic," WHO manages to assume bureaucratic power over the actions of nations, even if the death rate is very small. WHO stays in charge."
Another critically important observation from Jon, here, and as is usually always the case very engaging, erudite and incisive.
By Jon Rappoport
---Flashback to 2009---
I want to highlight two very brief excerpts from a British Medical Journal article (online, Sept. 3, 2009) by Peter Doshi. The title of the article is "Calibrated response to emerging infections."
Here is the first quote: "WHO (World Health Organization), for example, for years defined pandemics as outbreaks causing 'enormous numbers of deaths and illness,' but in early May, removed this phrase from the definition."
So WHO successfully maintained the emotional punch of a "pandemic" while cutting the heart out of its essential meaning. The fear is still there, but the logic is gone. Suddenly, a dreaded pandemic doesn't have to have lots of deaths.
Quite a clever ruse. George Orwell vindicated once again.
By declaring Swine Flu a "global pandemic," and at the same time redefining and diluting the understood meaning of the word "pandemic," WHO manages to assume bureaucratic power over the actions of nations, even if the death rate is very small. WHO stays in charge. Debate about the actual severity of the health threat is derailed because, well, it's already been declared a pandemic. And the level of public fear is maintained.
That is how propaganda works.
From this WHO ruse (and from statistics), we can infer that pandemic Swine Flu as a concept is being propped up by failing to disclose that the "disease" isn't killing people left and right. Otherwise, why remove "enormous numbers of deaths" from the definition of "pandemic?"
Here is the second quote from Doshi's article: "On 26 April, with 20 cases [of Swine Flu] and no deaths in the US, the Department of Health and Human Services declared a nationwide public health emergency."
What we're looking at here is institutional ambition. How does a government agency earn its keep? How does an agency like the Department of Health and Human Services go up on the Hill and extract big-time funding from Congress?
With 20, TWENTY, cases of so-called Swine Flu, and NO deaths, an effect less than the number of people killed in New York by toasters falling out of apartment windows, the Department of Health and Human Services declares a national emergency.
And the media comply. No questions are asked. Headlines trumpet the news. A new round of fear begins.
There is much more to the Swine Flu hoax, and I've reported on it in great detail, but this gives you an idea of how far the Ministry of Truth will reach to launch an utter fabrication.
And of course, the fabrication paved the way for insistence on taking an experimental dangerous vaccine. The business of vaccines is the business of government.
"By declaring Swine Flu a "global pandemic," and at the same time redefining and diluting the understood meaning of the word "pandemic," WHO manages to assume bureaucratic power over the actions of nations, even if the death rate is very small. WHO stays in charge."
Another critically important observation from Jon, here, and as is usually always the case very engaging, erudite and incisive.
By Jon Rappoport
---Flashback to 2009---
I want to highlight two very brief excerpts from a British Medical Journal article (online, Sept. 3, 2009) by Peter Doshi. The title of the article is "Calibrated response to emerging infections."
Here is the first quote: "WHO (World Health Organization), for example, for years defined pandemics as outbreaks causing 'enormous numbers of deaths and illness,' but in early May, removed this phrase from the definition."
So WHO successfully maintained the emotional punch of a "pandemic" while cutting the heart out of its essential meaning. The fear is still there, but the logic is gone. Suddenly, a dreaded pandemic doesn't have to have lots of deaths.
Quite a clever ruse. George Orwell vindicated once again.
By declaring Swine Flu a "global pandemic," and at the same time redefining and diluting the understood meaning of the word "pandemic," WHO manages to assume bureaucratic power over the actions of nations, even if the death rate is very small. WHO stays in charge. Debate about the actual severity of the health threat is derailed because, well, it's already been declared a pandemic. And the level of public fear is maintained.
That is how propaganda works.
From this WHO ruse (and from statistics), we can infer that pandemic Swine Flu as a concept is being propped up by failing to disclose that the "disease" isn't killing people left and right. Otherwise, why remove "enormous numbers of deaths" from the definition of "pandemic?"
Here is the second quote from Doshi's article: "On 26 April, with 20 cases [of Swine Flu] and no deaths in the US, the Department of Health and Human Services declared a nationwide public health emergency."
What we're looking at here is institutional ambition. How does a government agency earn its keep? How does an agency like the Department of Health and Human Services go up on the Hill and extract big-time funding from Congress?
With 20, TWENTY, cases of so-called Swine Flu, and NO deaths, an effect less than the number of people killed in New York by toasters falling out of apartment windows, the Department of Health and Human Services declares a national emergency.
And the media comply. No questions are asked. Headlines trumpet the news. A new round of fear begins.
There is much more to the Swine Flu hoax, and I've reported on it in great detail, but this gives you an idea of how far the Ministry of Truth will reach to launch an utter fabrication.
And of course, the fabrication paved the way for insistence on taking an experimental dangerous vaccine. The business of vaccines is the business of government.