View Full Version : Scientists Show that They Can Change People's Moral Judgments
irishspirit
30th December 2010, 22:34
Scientists have shown they can alter your moral judgments just by disrupting a specific area of your brain with magnetic pulses.
A region of your brain just above and behind your right ear appears to control morality -- a bundle of nerve cells known as the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ).
When the researchers used magnetic pulses to block cell activity in that region, they impaired volunteers' notion of right and wrong.
BBC News reports:
"In one scenario participants were asked how acceptable it was for a man to let his girlfriend walk across a bridge he knew to be unsafe. After receiving a 500-millisecond magnetic pulse to the scalp, the volunteers delivered verdicts based on outcome rather than moral principle. If the girlfriend made it across the bridge safely, her boyfriend was not seen as having done anything wrong."
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/12/29/scientists-show-that-they-can-change-peoples-moral-judgments.aspx
and we wonder why we got so many sheep?
xbusymom
30th December 2010, 23:01
wasn't there a connection to the use of cell phones for this?
Carmody
31st December 2010, 18:07
All that is not necessary as a 'foil' or windmill to tilt at. The Standford prison experiment is one example.
Then there is the one where the person is asked to help electrocute a 'faked' test subject ..and when the fake subject (person) got test answers wrong..and then the person 'helping' (the real person being tested) is asked to apply lethal voltages to the fake test subject. When the experiment 'head' assures the helping person it is ok to apply the obviously labeled LETHAL increased voltage to the fake test subject, the helping person applies the voltage, most times. ie, something like just over 7 out of 10 would and did apply the lethal voltage, as they were told it was ok to do so.
This means that corrupting the majority of the population's 'moral position'..... is as simple as telling them it is OK -from a position of insinuated or faked authority or position of insinuated/implicated knowledge/intelligence.
This conforms to some degree the point that Doc Peterson stated (IIRC) in his interview.... about the percentage of people that can be hypnotized or are inordinately receptive to manipulation.
I used to tell people who wondered about these things about how easy it was and is to fire up people's animal based emotional and mental cues and systems. I work with someone who owns a factory. Full of employees.Sometimes I'd be talking to them on this sort of subject.
I'd tell them that if I ran through the building looking REALLY, SERIOUSLY freaked out, and screaming, "Run for your lives!!!"....they would all immediately follow through with the same behavior. 100% of them would, I'd wager.... and they had to agree. Their mental response to my perceived physiological and possibly mental stance of ...'something'. A 'something' that ended up forming and and ruling their mental and physical response.
It was and is a case of physiological and psychological context and stance that is read by the other person through their emotional system and this becomes the foundation of their logic process, as 'fight or flight' actions and reactions take precedent of over logic, in the human body.
It really is as simple as that. Understanding the complexities that can and do occur around those aspects is a a large part of the needed basics on getting one's head straight.
In the final analysis it is immensely easy to manipulate people's logic formation from the doorway of their emotional underpinnings, the ones that rule the formation of mental and physical response. The lizard like people among us, the low empathy sociopaths who attempt to run this world, they understand this far better than others... as this is the one thing they DON'T suffer from and is one of the major separations of them as compared to the rest of society.
Thus it becomes one of if not their main methods of manipulating society.
Out of mind - out of sight.
Literally.
bashi
31st December 2010, 18:31
They applied an extremely strong stimulation technique by using
these stimulators at a field-strength setting of 3.000.000 nano-Tesla:
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/8906/1256213490fileeng.jpg (http://img691.imageshack.us/i/1256213490fileeng.jpg/)
I doubt that a normally experienced mag field (in the range like 500 nano Tesla) would be strong enough to create any effect.
Carmody
31st December 2010, 18:50
The other point is that if the idea of hypnosis..that it works... that it works at all (And it DOES work).....this is a HUGE indication... a giant red flag of the most immense proportions...that you don't really, even remotely... know the limits of your own mind or how to run the damn thing.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.