PDA

View Full Version : Stephen Hawking died today (14 March 2018, UK time)



Bob
14th March 2018, 04:02
After living years past his expected demise, Stephen succumbed tonite..

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43396008

RIP Stephen.. Time and space will not be the same after your passing..

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/1273C/production/_100408557_mediaitem100408555.jpg

Physicist Stephen Hawking has died at the age of 76, a spokesman for his family has said.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Stephen Hawking, the brightest star in the firmament of science, whose insights shaped modern cosmology and inspired global audiences in the millions, has died aged 76.

His family released a statement in the early hours of Wednesday morning confirming his death at his home in Cambridge.


A brief history of Stephen Hawking's Brief History of Time

Hawking’s children, Lucy, Robert and Tim said in a statement: “We are deeply saddened that our beloved father passed away today.

“He was a great scientist and an extraordinary man whose work and legacy will live on for many years.

“His courage and persistence with his brilliance and humour inspired people across the world.

“He once said, ‘It would not be much of a universe if it wasn’t home to the people you love.’ We will miss him for ever.”

For fellow scientists and loved ones, it was Hawking’s intuition and wicked sense of humour that marked him out as much as the broken body and synthetic voice that came to symbolise the unbounded possibilities of the human mind.

Hawking was driven to Wagner, but not the bottle, when he was diagnosed with motor neurone disease in 1963 at the age of 21. Doctors expected him to live for only two more years. But Hawking had a form of the disease that progressed more slowly than usual. He survived for more than half a century and long enough for his disability to define him. His popularity would surely have been diminished without it.

Hawking once estimated he worked only 1,000 hours during his three undergraduate years at Oxford. “You were supposed to be either brilliant without effort, or accept your limitations,” he wrote in his 2013 autobiography, My Brief History. In his finals, Hawking came borderline between a first and second class degree. Convinced that he was seen as a difficult student, he told his viva examiners that if they gave him a first he would move to Cambridge to pursue his PhD. Award a second and he threatened to stay at Oxford. They opted for a first.

Those who live in the shadow of death are often those who live most. For Hawking, the early diagnosis of his terminal disease, and his witnessing the death from leukaemia of a boy he knew in hospital, ignited a fresh sense of purpose. “Although there was a cloud hanging over my future, I found, to my surprise, that I was enjoying life in the present more than before. I began to make progress with my research,” he once said. Embarking on his career in earnest, he declared: “My goal is simple. It is a complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is and why it exists at all.”

He began to use crutches in the 1960s, but long fought the use of a wheelchair. When he finally relented, he became notorious for his wild driving along the streets of Cambridge, not to mention the intentional running over of students’ toes and the occasional spin on the dance floor at college parties.

Hawking’s first major breakthrough came in 1970, when he and Roger Penrose applied the mathematics of black holes to the entire universe and showed that a singularity, a region of infinite curvature in spacetime, lay in our distant past: the point from which came the big bang.

Penrose found he was able to talk with Hawking even as the latter’s speech failed. It seemed that whenever Penrose misunderstood, it was a joke or an invitation to dinner. But the main thing that came across was Hawking’s absolute determination not to let anything get in his way. “He thought he didn’t have long to live, and he really wanted to get as much as he could done at that time,” Penrose said.

In discussions, Hawking could be provocative, even antagonistic. Penrose recalls one conference dinner where Hawking came out with a run of increasingly controversial statements which seemed hand-crafted to wind Penrose up. They were all of a technical nature and culminated with Hawking declaring that white holes were simply black holes reversed in time. “That did it so far as I was concerned,” an exasperated Penrose told the Guardian. “We had a long argument after that.”

Hawking continued to work on black holes and in 1974 drew on quantum theory to declare that black holes should emit heat and eventually pop out of existence. For normal black holes, the process is not a fast one, it taking longer than the age of the universe for a black hole the mass of the sun to evaporate. But near the ends of their lives, mini-black holes release heat at a spectacular rate, eventually exploding with the energy of a million one-megaton hydrogen bombs. Miniature black holes dot the universe, Hawking said, each as heavy as a billion tonnes, but no larger than a proton.

His proposal that black holes radiate heat stirred up one of the most passionate debates in modern cosmology. Hawking argued that if a black hole could evaporate into a bath of radiation, all the information that fell inside over its lifetime would be lost forever. It contradicted one of the most basic laws of quantum mechanics, and plenty of physicists disagreed. Hawking came round to believing the more common, if no less baffling explanation, that information is stored at the black hole’s event horizon, and encoded back into radiation as the black hole radiates.

Marika Taylor, a former student of Hawking’s and now professor of theoretical physics at Southampton University, remembers how Hawking announced his U-turn on the information paradox to his students. He was discussing their work with them in the pub when Taylor noticed he was turning his speech synthesiser up to the max. “I’m coming out!” he bellowed. The whole pub turned around and looked at the group before Hawking turned the volume down and clarified the statement: “I’m coming out and admitting that maybe information loss doesn’t occur.” He had, Taylor said, “a wicked sense of humour.”

Hawking’s run of radical discoveries led to his election in 1974 to the Royal Society at the exceptionally young age of 32. Five years later, he became the Lucasian professor of mathematics at Cambridge, arguably Britain’s most distinguished chair, and one formerly held by Isaac Newton, Charles Babbage and Paul Dirac, the latter one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics. Hawking held the post for 30 years, then moved to become director of research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology.

Hawking’s seminal contributions continued through the 1980s. The theory of cosmic inflation holds that the fledgling universe went through a period of terrific expansion. In 1982, Hawking was among the first to show how quantum fluctuations – tiny variations in the distribution of matter – might give rise through inflation to the spread of galaxies in the universe. In these tiny ripples lay the seeds of stars, planets and life as we know it. “It is one of the most beautiful ideas in the history of science” said Max Tegmark, a physics professor at MIT.

But it was A Brief History of Time that rocketed Hawking to stardom. Published for the first time in 1988, the title made the Guinness Book of Records after it stayed on the Sunday Times bestsellers list for an unprecedented 237 weeks. It sold 10m copies and was translated into 40 different languages. Some credit must go to Hawking’s editor at Bantam, Peter Guzzardi, who took the original title: “From the Big Bang to Black Holes: A Short History of Time”, turned it around, and changed the “Short” to “Brief”. Nevertheless, wags called it the greatest unread book in history.

Hawking married his college sweetheart, Jane Wilde, in 1965, two years after his diagnosis. She first set eyes on him in 1962, lolloping down the street in St Albans, his face down, covered by an unruly mass of brown hair. A friend warned her she was marrying into “a mad, mad family”. With all the innocence of her 21 years, she trusted that Stephen would cherish her, she wrote in her 2013 book, Travelling to Infinity: My Life With Stephen.

In 1985, during a trip to Cern, Hawking was taken to hospital with an infection. He was so ill that doctors asked Jane if they should withdraw life support. She refused, and Hawking was flown back to Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge for a lifesaving tracheotomy. The operation saved his life but destroyed his voice. The couple had three children, but the marriage broke down in 1991. Hawking’s worsening disability, his demands on Jane, and his refusal to discuss his illness, were destructive forces the relationship could not endure. Jane wrote of him being “a child possessed of a massive and fractious ego,” and how husband and wife became “master” and “slave”.

Four years later, Hawking married Elaine Mason, one of the nurses employed to give him round-the-clock care. Mason was the former wife of David Mason, who designed the first wheelchair-mounted speech synthesiser Hawking used. The marriage lasted 11 years, during which Cambridgeshire police investigated a series of alleged assaults on Hawking. The physicist denied that Elaine was involved, and refused to cooperate with police, who dropped the investigation.

Hawking was not, perhaps, the greatest physicist of his time, but in cosmology he was a towering figure. There is no perfect proxy for scientific worth, but Hawking won the Albert Einstein Award, the Wolf Prize, the Copley Medal, and the Fundamental Physics Prize. The Nobel prize, however, eluded him.

He was fond of scientific wagers, despite a knack for losing them. In 1975, he bet the US physicist Kip Thorne a subscription to Penthouse that the cosmic x-ray source Cygnus X-1 was not a black hole. He lost in 1990. In 1997, Hawking and Thorne bet John Preskill an encyclopaedia that information must be lost in black holes. Hawking conceded in 2004. In 2012, Hawking lost $100 to Gordon Kane for betting that the Higgs boson would not be discovered.

He lectured at the White House during the Clinton administration – his oblique references to the Monica Lewinsky episode evidently lost on those who screened his speech – and returned in 2009 to receive the presidential medal of freedom from Barack Obama. His life was played out in biographies and documentaries, most recently The Theory of Everything, in which Eddie Redmayne played him. “At times I thought he was me,” Hawking said on watching the film. He appeared on The Simpsons and played poker with Einstein and Newton on Star Trek: The Next Generation. He delivered gorgeous put-downs on The Big Bang Theory. “What do Sheldon Cooper and a black hole have in common?” Hawking asked the fictional Caltech physicist whose IQ comfortably outstrips his social skills. After a pause, the answer came: “They both suck.”

In 2012, scientists gathered in Cambridge to celebrate the cosmologist’s 70th birthday. It was one of those milestones in life that few expected Hawking to reach. He spent the event at Addenbrooke’s, too ill to attend, but in a recorded message entitled A Brief History of Mine, he called for the continued exploration of space “for the future of humanity.” Without spreading out into space, humans would not “survive another thousand years,” he said.

He later joined Tesla’s Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak to warn against an artificial intelligence military arms race, and called for a ban on autonomous weapons.

Hawking was happy to court controversy and was accused of being sexist and misogynist. He turned up at Stringfellows lap dancing club in 2003, and years later declared women “a complete mystery”. In 2013, he boycotted a major conference in Israel on the advice of Palestinian academics.

Some of his most outspoken comments offended the religious. In his 2010 book, Grand Design, he declared that God was not needed to set the universe going, and in an interview with the Guardian a year later, dismissed the comforts of religious belief

“I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark,” he said.

He spoke also of death, an eventuality that sat on a more distant horizon than doctors thought. “I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I’m not afraid of death, but I’m in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first,” he said.

What astounded those around him was how much he did achieve. He leaves three children, Robert, Lucy and Timothy, from his first marriage to Jane Wilde, and three grandchildren.

DNA
14th March 2018, 04:14
Party on Mr. Hawking in the great Beyond. :)

https://media.giphy.com/media/5JvTy7W1i5iZq/giphy.gif

https://img.culturacolectiva.com/content/2016/01/Stephen-Hawking-Simpsons-medium.gif

Bob
14th March 2018, 04:23
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/memoryalpha/images/1/1e/Brent_Spiner_and_Stephen_Hawking.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/629?cb=20120718180959&path-prefix=en



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg8_cKxJZJY

in another language:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63WsWykwEcs

badmotorfinger
14th March 2018, 06:25
Did Stephen Hawking die tonight?
Having watched one of my closest friends die from MND in a typical ~3yrs from diagnosis, & having asked various medical professionals about this case (ALL of whom drew a blank when it came to throwing any light on this *unique* case of someone outlasting initial prognosis *by many decades* - not a single other case comes close), personally I have to wonder.
Is this Miles Mathis piece worth consideration?
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf

Cidersomerset
14th March 2018, 07:17
Best of Big Bang Theory - "Stephen Hawking"

1WTQryVAXX8


===================================================

Stephen Hawking dies at the age of 76

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT-5_C81MkA
Published on 13 Mar 2018
Renowned British scientist Stephen Hawking, known for
his breakthrough ideas in theoretical physics and space
research, has died at the age of 76, his family says.

===================================================

Physicist Stephen Hawking has died
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA8GdJJqz_s
Published on 13 Mar 2018
World renowned theoretical physicist, cosmologist, astronomer and
mathematician Stephen Hawking has passed away at age 76.

===================================================

KiwiElf
14th March 2018, 09:10
Everything happens in cycles... Einstein's birthday - 14 March 1879. Notice? ;)

RIP Stephen Hawking - one of the greatest minds of our generation.:heart:

Star Tsar
14th March 2018, 09:50
Next incarnation I wish to have a top of the line cosmic soul vehicle

:clapping:

uzn
14th March 2018, 10:03
Richard Branson promised him to take him into space in 2007. But Virgin Galactic did never deliver, epic fail and a broken promise. Shame on you Richard Branson.
Rest in peace dear soul

integralpart
14th March 2018, 10:18
Believe me, I first knew who is Stephen Hawking through the movie "The Theory of Everything" and started to look up about him. Then I was amazed by his work and achievements. So yes of course today, when the news was telling me he is no longer with us, apart of me is dead too.

ZenBaller
14th March 2018, 10:22
RIP to the real Stephen Hawking, whenever he really died (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91099-Rich-Planet-Stephen-Hawking-possibly-replaced&highlight=hawking+clone), most probably in the mid 80s).

Joe from the Carolinas
14th March 2018, 12:17
Here’s as close as he got:

OhIpdSZQZlI

Hopefully the doctors are able to apply his longevity with his ALS variant to other patients, if they’re interested.

Mark (Star Mariner)
14th March 2018, 13:05
RIP Stephen Hawking. Thank you for your wonderful discoveries and insights. A true genius of our time.


“I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark,” he said.

Well, you didn't quite know it all.

But now that you're blissfully free at last of this heavy realm, I do hope you enjoy your new view of the Universe. You spent your life trying to understand it. But it's a great deal larger, and grander, than you thought...

Bob
14th March 2018, 15:01
Stephen's kids -

https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/nintchdbpict000392047845-e1521019808611.jpg?strip=all&w=960

2015
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/nintchdbpict000392049383.jpg?strip=all&w=960

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-lg/public/2018/03/14/gettyimages-462989964.jpg
Stephen Hawking (lower Center) arrives on the red carpet with former wife Jane Hawking (Left) and daughter Lucy Hawking (Right) for the BAFTA British Academy Film Awards at the Royal Opera House in London on February 8, 2015

In 2015, Timothy discussed his father’s motor neuron disease.

“My dad was able to speak with his own, natural voice for those first years, but it was incredibly difficult to understand what he was saying — particularly for me at such a young age,” he said in a BBC documentary. “As a 3-year-old, I had no understanding of what he was saying. I didn’t really have any communication with him for the first five years of my life.”

Timothy said that it was only when his father got a voice synthesizer that he was able to speak to him.

“It was somewhat ironic that Dad losing his voice was actually the start of us being able to form a relationship,” he said.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/13/19/2998553300000578-0-image-m-7_1434218545376.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/13/19/2998551D00000578-3122941-Discussing_Stephen_Dara_O_Briain_interviewed_Tim_Hawking_right_f-a-1_1434219448311.jpg

Bob
14th March 2018, 15:13
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/resources/images/5710537.jpg?display=1&htype=385&type=responsive-gallery

" Humanity must continue exploring space to reach 'beyond our humble planet'. " 16th November 2016 Stephen was saying such to university students and professors at Oxford Union.

" No matter how difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do and be good at. "

Wind
14th March 2018, 15:32
Now he's free from his physical limitations and is at home with God again. I wish him happy journeys!

Billy
14th March 2018, 16:50
Look what you created, Journey well Stephen. :heart:

Aap_UtTuzYs

Agape
14th March 2018, 17:59
Well, Stephen...what about do some maths on the other side and send us a postcard ?


People say Rest in Peace because they did not figure out what’s on the other side...

but there’s work

there’s food

Thinking of moving on as well ..


:flower:

Lettherebelight
14th March 2018, 18:29
He did not believe in life beyond death. He said it was for people who are afraid of the dark. I wonder if he still thinks the same now, or perhaps does not think at all since he now has no his brain to think with?
I wish him well in his onward journey, if there is one.

happyuk
14th March 2018, 19:40
Update: Dear moderators, I should have looked at the existing threads more closely and seen that a similar thread already exists. Please do your thing!

It was one of Richard D Hall's presentations that first alerted me to the fact that the Stephen Hawking portrayed in the media may not be who we think he is:

c1WaE_9Xeao

What has really surprised me recently in light of his recent death is an article in the Mail from January 2018 that suggests the real Hawking in all likelihood must have died quite some decades ago, given the typical prognosis of someone in his condition.

Every so often an article will appear in the mainstream media that really (and fearlessly) goes right against the grain and comes up with a peach of an article. I consider this article to be one of them

Here is a chunk from the Mail article:


A lot of the theories presented by Hawking are difficult to prove.

An example of this can be seen in a TV programme, hosted by Magnus Magnusson, where Hawking appeared alongside science fiction writers Arthur C. Clarke and Carl Sagan. The voice from the machine spoke.

It said: 'There are two kinds of time. There is what's called real time. This is the kind of time that's measured by a clock, the time that we feel passing, the time in which we grow older… Then there is imaginary time… a well-defined mathematical concept… Imaginary time has no beginning or end. Imaginary time is closed in on itself, like the surface of the earth. The surface of the earth doesn't have any beginning or end…'

So why the need for a 'puppet professor'?

If what the conspiracy theorists say is true and if the real Hawking has been switched, the question would obviously be: why?

The most common theory is that it was – and still is - important for those in control to push science and 'lose' God. The powers that be want people to feel that they are tiny unimportant dots in an infinite universe, on one of a trillion planets, in a sea of countless suns, the reason being that people who feel insignificant and small also feel powerless and unimportant, thus making them easier to control.

They also want to get the public used to accepting theories as fact.

The substitute Hawking, they claim, is used as a puppet to instill fear in the general population, promoting the idea that the human race has only 100 years left, that aliens exist and that contact with them – which may be imminent - could be catastrophic. All this scaremongering puts the public in a fearful state, again making them easier to manipulate.

Sceptics have observed that the 'puppet professor' is also a great proponent of Artificial Intelligence and science, claiming that 'philosophy is dead', that there is no God and that science has the answers to everything – all of which goes against his earlier philosophical stance and theories.

The Hawking of the last ten years has also pushed global warming, is anti-Trump, anti-Scottish Independence and anti-Brexit. He is suddenly very political, seemingly allowing his name to be tacked onto anything and everything in an attempt to make certain ideas or political agendas more credible; and, because the general public believe Professor Hawking is one of the most intelligent scientists of all time, this works.

In recent years, he's waxed lyrical about climate change, is a supporter of The Paris Agreement and, in an article in The Guardian last year, was quoted as being in support of carbon tax. He also recorded a tribute for the Democratic candidate Al Gore and was part of an academic boycott of a conference in Israel. There are many more examples of how Hawking's name has been attached to various political agenda, which truth-seekers find highly suspicious.

Full Mail article here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5261939/Has-Stephen-Hawking-replaced-puppet.html

Red Skywalker
14th March 2018, 19:43
He did not believe in life beyond death. He said it was for people who are afraid of the dark. I wonder if he still thinks the same now, or perhaps does not think at all since he now has no his brain to think with?
I wish him well in his onward journey, if there is one.

I hope he is very surprised still being able to think and now at last freed from that malfunctioning body. But, then it must be hell not able to communicate his findings back to us. Just catch up with Nicola Tesla for a change and leave Albert Einstein for what he was. That may bring some clarity in the situation you now hopefully may find yourself. :waving:

Anyway, Stephan, thanks for the good but also some bad thinking works on our planet.

Kano
14th March 2018, 21:33
And he died on Pi Day. Life is not without a sense of irony.

turiya
14th March 2018, 22:49
One thing that Stephen Hawking bio found within the OP does not include is that in his [Stephen Hawking] paper published on 22-Jan 2014 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761) states in so many words that black holes do not exist. The following is from an article written by Paul LaViolette on January 27, 2014 - just a few days after Hawking published his paper.

Since then, the scientific media & MSM has refrained from saying much about it.



Hawking Finally Sees the Light:
Says black holes do not exist (http://starburstfound.org/hawking-finally-sees-light-black-holes-exist/)

http://starburstfound.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Gfield.gif
Gravity potential field around a
Mother star. © P. LaViolette 1995

http://starburstfound.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Paul-300x293.jpg (http://etheric.com/paul-laviolette-bio/)





Paul LaViolette
January 27, 2014
Physicist Stephen Hawking has now reversed his stand on black holes. He gives his reasons in a paper that he posted five days ago on the physics preprint internet archive at (http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761). He says that according to his new analysis “There would be no event horizons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_horizon) and no firewalls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall_(physics)). The absence of event horizons mean that there are no black holes – in the sense of regimes from which light can’t escape to infinity.” He says that the concept of a black hole should be “redefined as a metastable bound state of the gravitational field” which has a chaotic interior. In other words, he now envisions that a supermassive Galactic core should be a collapsed region from which energy can escape through an “apparent horizon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_horizon)“. An apparent horizon is described as a surface that traps light but which also varies its shape due to quantum fluctuations allowing the possibility for light to escape.

His new stand on black holes has caused quite a media frenzy since Hawking had been an early developer and long-time supporter of black hole theory dating back as far as 40 years. Here are a few links to media stories:

Nature.com (http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583)
Foxnews.com (http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/01/26/stephen-hawking-contradicts-earlier-black-hole-claims/)
news.com.au (http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/stephen-hawking-boldly-claims-there-are-no-black-holes/story-fnjwlcze-1226810339993)
For many years I have argued against the black hole idea, which has been a very unpopular stance to take among physicists. For example, as early as 1985 when I first published subquantum kinetics in the International Journal of General Systems (Special Issue on Systems Thinking in Physics) (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03081078508934920#.UuZlPZXg41h), I wrote “Black holes would not exist in a subquantum kinetics cosmology” (LaViolette, 1985, p. 342). I explain that this is because a black hole gravitational singularity is unable to form in subquantum kinetics. Furthermore even a quasi singularity that Hawking calls a “bound state of the gravitational field” would be unable to form. One reason is that the gravitational field of a subatomic particle does not rise to infinity at its center, but rounds off to a plateau at the particle center, thus preventing unrestrained gravitational collapse. This predicted particle profile is apparent in simulations performed of subquantum kinetics’ Model G (http://starburstfound.org/wp-content/uploads/video-gallery/Subquantum/particle_formation_3d.mov) and this contour for the particle’s nuclear electric field has been confirmed through particle scattering experiments. Thus as particles approach increasingly close to one another, their mutual gravitational attraction approaches zero instead of infinity.

Another reason singularities are unable to form is because a star continuously produces enormous amounts of genic energy (spontaneously generated nascent energy) which effectively opposes any gravitational collapse even when fusion reactions have died out. Red dwarf stars (M < 0.45 Msolar) are 100% powered by genic energy; about 12% of the Sun’s radiation is of genic origin; and only a few tenths of a percent of the energy radiated by a 20 solar mass blue giant star is of genic origin. But when fusion burning subsides and a blue giant begins to gravitationally collapse, the genic energy production equations predict that genic energy sky rockets and becomes the dominant stellar energy source. The result is a very dense stellar core that I have termed a Mother star, which continually creates, radiates, and ejects both energy and matter. Smaller Mother stars are objects astronomers call neutron stars, X-ray stars, and magnetars. Mother stars that have grown far more massive over their billions of years of existence are what astronomers observe as supermassive Galactic cores. Those interested to learn more about genic energy are referred to various papers (LaViolette, 1992 (http://www.starburstfound.org/downloads/physics/M-L/M-L.html) and LaViolette, 2005 (http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0603191)), the following webpage on the Pioneer effect (http://starburstfound.org/early-prediction-pioneer-anomaly-challenges-energy-conservation-law/), as well as the verification of Prediction No. 3 (http://starburstfound.org/predictions-part-2/). For further discussion about the problems with the black hole idea view the following webpage: Five Reasons Why the Milky Way’s Core is Not a Black Hole (http://starburstfound.org/mother-star-gravity-well/2/). For the most thorough treatment of the nonexistence of black holes and the reality of genic energy and matter creating Mother stars, read the book Subquantum Kinetics (http://etheric.com/subquantum-kinetics-4th-edition/) (4th edition) (http://etheric.com/subquantum-kinetics-4th-edition/).

Over the years I have continued to maintain my stand against black holes throughout the years and have bolstered this with observational evidence that counters the black hole idea. So to hear that Hawking now admits, after many decades, that black holes should not exist is music to my ears. But Hawking still has a long way to go to make the journey from the classical black hole concept to the Mother star concept of subquantum kinetics. Hawking still believes that any energy radiated from a Galactic core, which he views as a metastable bound state of the gravitational field, would come entirely from the accretion of surrounding matter. For one thing, he would have to relinquish this idea and embrace the subquantum kinetics idea of genic energy. It is this energy that supermassive Galactic cores radiate and which keeps in check their further collapse. Genic energy unabashedly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (the law of energy conservation) as conventionally construed. Physicists who adopt the closed system positivist view that the only real existents are physically observable phenomena would find this idea intolerable. However those adopting the wider perspective that the physical universe operates as an open system and is part of a much more expansive higher dimensional environment that remains inherently unobservable to us, then the genic energy concept becomes quite acceptable. Ultimately, if physics (and society) is to progress, physics will need to move towards this latter view which not only comes closer to age old spiritual teachings but also opens up a golden age for humanity based on the commercialization of over-unity energy generation technologies and gravity defying propulsion devices; see the December 2013 news posting (http://starburstfound.org/reality-overunity-generators-evidence-open-system-universe/).

The subquantum kinetics Mother star idea does not deny the possibility that there is a radius within which light rays approaching tangent to the surface of the Mother star would become trapped in a closed orbit. If we identify this radius with the classical concept of the Schwarzschild radius, such a light trapping horizon would likely lie in the Mother star’s interior in the case of the Milky Way’s galactic core. For example, to my best estimation, the surface of the Sgr A* Mother star would lie a radius of about 22 solar radii from its center, whereas the ungravitationally lensed Schwarzschild radius for this supermassive body would be 19 solar radii, just below the surface of the Mother star. But light rays traveling radially outward from the surface of Sgr A* or at an angle to the surface would radiate outward without a problem; although they would be gravitationally redshifted by about 45%.

How does Hawking’s revised view relate to the upcoming G2 cloud encounter (http://etheric.com/galactic-pinball-will-lucky-latest-update/) with the Galactic core that astronomers are so closely following? Well, current papers describing this encounter are based on the standard black hole theory and the assumption that the Galactic core has an event horizon through which no matter or radiation can escape. This model must be dispensed with on the basis of Hawking’s new view. According to this new view if a massive body such as a one solar mass star were to fall into the Galactic core (and there is a relatively small probability that this might happen during the G2 cloud/star encounter), all the energy released from its infall could be explosively discharged back out as a cosmic ray volley accompanied by X-ray and gamma ray radiation. If we go beyond Hawking to the subquantum kinetics view, not only would such an infall allow the release of the energy of mass infall, but it could ignite an exponential rise in the genic energy being produced by our Galactic core Mother star and this as well could be radiated outward to the rest of the Galaxy resulting in an energy output many of orders of magnitude higher than the total energy released from the infall of the star alone. In short, it could possibly ignite a Galactic core explosion of the kind seen in Seyfert galaxy nuclei. The magnitude of this energy release and the finding that cosmic rays from such an event would begin impacting Earth about the same time would come as a total surprise to current astronomers who operate on the classical black hole idea. If this scenario happens, they had best stay indoors and keep out of harms way.

Source: Paul LaViolette @ Starburstfound.org (http://starburstfound.org/hawking-finally-sees-light-black-holes-exist/) -- (Emphasis mine.)

Star Tsar
14th March 2018, 23:12
And he died on Pi Day. Life is not without a sense of irony.

Much like Jim Marrs leaving on the 50th anniversary of the Apollo missions.

Cidersomerset
14th May 2018, 17:44
In 2009 Discovery Channel filmed the professor waiting for time travellers who
never turned up to his party. After the "time traveller party", held in June 2009, Prof
Hawking remarked that the fact that no-one turned up was "experimental evidence that
time travel is not possible".


No genuine time traveller is going to reveal themselves...Duh !!!

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/files/2011/04/time-machine.pnghttp://d3adcc0j1hezoq.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/backtothefuture-620x360.jpg



Though Putin seems to pop up in times of need in Russia....

http://www.outerplaces.com/media/k2/items/cache/bb037765c87eb94e0c7eacf9ac5f8bcc_L.jpg


http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.22.44/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png

Stephen Hawking service: Possibility of time travellers 'can't be excluded'

12 May 2018

Prof Stephen Hawking's life will be celebrated at a service in June

Organisers of Prof Stephen Hawking's memorial service have seemingly
left the door open for time travellers to attend.Those wishing to honour
the theoretical physicist, who died in March aged 76, can apply via a
public ballot.Applicants need to give their birth date - which can be any
day up to 31 December 2038.

Prof Hawking's foundation said the possibility of time travel had not
been disproven and could not be excluded.It was London travel blogger
IanVisits who noticed that those born from 2019 to 2038 were theoretically
permitted to attend the service at Westminster Abbey.

He said: "Professor Hawking once threw a party for time travellers, to see
if any would turn up if he posted the invite after the party. "None did, but
it seems perfect that the memorial website allows people born in the future
to attend the service.

"Look out for time travellers at the Abbey."
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/89EE/production/_101301353_0bb21d5e-42e3-4369-a8a5-bd815bd3d654.jpg
In 2009 Discovery Channel filmed the professor waiting for time travellers
who never turned up to his party.After the "time traveller party", held in June
2009, Prof Hawking remarked that the fact that no-one turned up was
"experimental evidence that time travel is not possible".

read more...http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.22.44/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png