Linda Moulton Howe: Are we living in a holographic simulation?

[PathWalker]

I wish to share this very important video.

Linda explains what is holographic projection.
Reviews evidence from various scientists and contactees.
Including: Jerry Wills, Michael Talbot, Tom Campbell, David Bohm and others I forget to mention.

The video and the material enclosed is ground breaking and belief shattering.
Be prepared to peek into the matrix.


Linda Moulton Howe, Emmy Award-winning TV Producer and Reporter; Editor of the award-winning news website Earthfiles.com; and Investigative Reporter for Coast to Coast AM with George Noory on the iHeart Premiere Radio Networks opens up her investigations with human abductees and scientists about the possibility that our universe is Somebody Else’s computer simulation. Some people in the human abduction syndrome have reported that E.T.s describe our universe as a 3-D hologram projected from another dimension by a Super Intelligence. Quantum computer engineers and astrophysicists ask in scientific papers: “Are We Living in a Computer Simulation Universe?” On April 5, 2016, the Hayden Planetarium in New York hosted a debate on the question “Is the Universe A Simulation?” One of the panelists, James Gates, Ph.D., a theoretical physicist at the Univ. of Maryland said: “If the simulation hypothesis is valid, then we open the door to eternal life and resurrection and things that formally have been discussed in the realm of religion.” Human abductee Michael Talbot wrote in his 1992 book, The Holographic Universe, about what he learned from an alien.4FbD_ojWWXw

[Valerie Villars]

In my experience this is true. In fact, most of what constitutes civilized society was shown to be of the shabbiest and laughable construct. Nature is the only thing that doesn't lie. Also came to see many, many people really are just set props. Very strange experience.

[Pam]

In my experience this is true. In fact, most of what constitutes civilized society was shown to be of the shabbiest and laughable construct. Nature is the only thing that doesn't lie. Also came to see many, many people really are just set props. Very strange experience.


Valerie, I have suspected the very same thing, the part about set props.

[Caliban]

In my experience this is true. In fact, most of what constitutes civilized society was shown to be of the shabbiest and laughable construct. Nature is the only thing that doesn't lie. Also came to see many, many people really are just set props. Very strange experience.


Valerie, I have suspected the very same thing, the part about set props.

Michael Talbot, who wrote The Holographic Universe, posited that all of Reality was holographic, interconnected, and that no "piece" of it could be separated from any other piece. He didn't write about our reality in term of a "computer simulation" being controlled by some, presumably ET, forces.

I always think about this topic in relation to the Hindu idea of Maya, basically that physical reality is an illusion, a temporary phantasm held up by our incarnating into bodies and accepting the limitations of individual minds, all for the purpose, one supposes, of the big G learning about Itself.

Just because our reality is some kind of simulation, doesn't mean that it's a "computer" simulation, at least in the way we conceive of that concept. And--just because this "simulation" (maya) may be controlled in some ways--doesn't mean that it's an ultimate type of control and that we're little bots running around in a grand programmer's great hard drive. I'd like to give us more cosmic credit than that.

I do find it kinda fascinating that this topic thread appears over and over on Avalon. We're def seeing through "reality" but what is it we're seeing ?

[Valerie Villars]

In my experience this is true. In fact, most of what constitutes civilized society was shown to be of the shabbiest and laughable construct. Nature is the only thing that doesn't lie. Also came to see many, many people really are just set props. Very strange experience.


Valerie, I have suspected the very same thing, the part about set props.

Michael Talbot, who wrote The Holographic Universe, posited that all of Reality was holographic, interconnected, and that no "piece" of it could be separated from any other piece. He didn't write about our reality in term of a "computer simulation" being controlled by some, presumably ET, forces.

I always think about this topic in relation to the Hindu idea of Maya, basically that physical reality is an illusion, a temporary phantasm held up by our incarnating into bodies and accepting the limitations of individual minds, all for the purpose, one supposes, of the big G learning about Itself.

Just because our reality is some kind of simulation, doesn't mean that it's a "computer" simulation, at least in the way we conceive of that concept. And--just because this "simulation" (maya) may be controlled in some ways--doesn't mean that it's an ultimate type of control and that we're little bots running around in a grand programmer's great hard drive. I'd like to give us more cosmic credit than that.

I do find it kinda fascinating that this topic thread appears over and over on Avalon. We're def seeing through "reality" but what is it we're seeing ?

Caliban, I agree with your well thought out reply. I tend not to go into too much detail, as it's not the way I think, but the point of what I saw is that the man made constructs were laughable and unimportant compared to the big G experiencing his/her self. That mankind had gone off into ridiculous tangents led by haste and greed.

Cathedrals were more stunningly beautiful than normal, for instance. Those had grace and majesty, but they were also man made constructs of spiritual, not materialistic, truths. Thanks for clarifying.

[Valerie Villars]

In my experience this is true. In fact, most of what constitutes civilized society was shown to be of the shabbiest and laughable construct. Nature is the only thing that doesn't lie. Also came to see many, many people really are just set props. Very strange experience.


Valerie, I have suspected the very same thing, the part about set props.

Peterpam, that's probably because they ARE shabby compared to other things. It is what they looked like to me. Just like "The Truman Show".

[Justplain]

I tend to think that this is more than a simulation. And although the multiverse is an electric haulogram, the stakes here are real enough. Death can be quite traumatic.

If the technically advanced ETs have to run Earth as a farm (it seems to me they are), with humans being their major livestock, then, although these ETs have learned how to jump dimensions and matter and time, they have still not mastered how to sustain themselves without burdening innocent, and self-aware, victims with their 'harvesting'. As well, this ET farming of Earth and humanity shows that whoever the grand magician is of this universe, it has chosen to not halt this activity, for whatever reasons i cannot fathom (unless it doesnt give a sh#t).

So, granted this multiverse is a haulogram (ie. all matter is static energy with tons of space between 'particles'), it is extremely difficult to figure out what is really going on here.

[Caliban]

Caliban, I agree with your well thought out reply. I tend not to go into too much detail, as it's not the way I think, but the point of what I saw is that the man made constructs were laughable and unimportant compared to the big G experiencing his/her self. That mankind had gone off into ridiculous tangents led by haste and greed.

Cathedrals were more stunningly beautiful than normal, for instance. Those had grace and majesty, but they were also man made constructs of spiritual, not materialistic, truths. Thanks for clarifying.

Valerie, not sure if you meant "haste" and greed, or hate and greed, but either one makes sense in regard to what's become of our relations with each other. Haste makes waste, right...

But yeah, when you have those moments of profound clarity it all just seems, well, like a waste. A waste of energy, creativity, and ultimately, beauty. You ever think how much beauty goes unexpressed in the world? Things we want to say to each other but we hold back (maybe rightly so), things we want to do but that get stultified...

Maybe this simulation theory is another way to make us seem "less than," or just worth nothing? Another way to make us feel not merely trapped, but totally futile?

[Bill Ryan]

An excellent presentation.

Two things are significant here:

1) Linda repeats the VERY important information that Michael Talbot (the author of the seminal The Holographic Universe) was an abductee. Linda has told this story several times, now, and it deserves to be retold many times over. The importance is that according to Budd Hopkins, who had worked with Talbot and had relayed the story to Linda, Talbot had received the core thesis of his book from his abducting ETs.

Here's the book. It's a masterwork, and I can't recommend it too highly.


http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Michael%20Talbot%20-%20The%20Holographic%20Universe.pdf

I have to say, rather horrifying to me was when Linda asked the audience (at 51:44) how many had heard about or read the book. Linda counted 25-30 people in what must have been a room of a couple hundred or more. OMG. That's a travesty.

READ IT!! :) It's a paradigm changer.

2) Linda recounts the VERY fascinating story of Jerry Wills and the Stargate of Aramu Muru.

See this thread here for much more:


The Stargate of Aramu Muru, in Peru (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10612-The-Stargate-of-Aramu-Muru-in-Peru)

What was valuable for me was Linda's replaying of her interview with Jerry Wills, which is from 38:40—51:40. It's the the most comprehensive account of his extraordinary experience that I've heard. (Clearly it'd been published before, but I was unaware of it. It may be behind Linda's Earthfiles.com paywall, of course.)

There's no doubt at all that what happened to Jerry was real. (For readers who know nothing about this, Jerry actually went through the stargate. Not mentioned in this interview was that he figured he'd been away for maybe as long as 10-11 hours, but his wife, who'd seen him disappear with her own eyes, reported that he reappeared after just a few minutes.)

Jerry Wills is impressive to listen to. And do visit the Aramu Muru thread above for more information and videos.

[Cardillac]

David Icke stated we are living in a holographic universe long before LMH- a holograph/hologram is just simply a fractionalization/diminutized version of the original light source (among other perceived 5th-sense de-coded sources)-

for example: why can't we see the air we breathe?

the Talbot book is truly a seminal publication!

stay well all-

Larry

[RunningDeer]

http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/matrix-rods.jpg

@ 43:48 Jerry Wills’ drawing triggered a recall of a recent events. Of late, I’ve been seeing a wider scope of things. When I was little and into my teenage years, it felt like I was part of a play and there was an audience watching.

I mentioned elsewhere that a friend and I had a pack that whom ever went first we’d touch base before moving on. It’s been two weeks since he passed. He was in my dreams and in my waking thoughts for several days before I learned the news. A couple of days later, he touched base with me. A lot was covered in a short amount of time. One thing was his advise to stay the path and that I was close. At the time I thought it was based on what he sees in my auric field. I saw what he was explaining. I took it to mean growth rather than physicality.

The auric visual was similar to Jerry’s model and what I’ve seen for the last several months. These rods were all around, only there were more of them. The angles had no pattern to them. Though, I assumed they were light beams. This house of mirror was/is endless. Fortunately, the rods have become more subtle so it doesn’t feel as congested. I figured the countless me(s) was a metaphor for aspects or parallel experiences.

My goal is to step out of this house of mirrors (matrix). I have a feeling it’s just a matter of focused intent. But what happens is within minutes I go from wide awake into a deep sleep that often lasts for hours.

So for now, I’ll gather the pieces and at some point they’ll fit together. http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/noidea.gif


http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/sphere-puzzle2.jpg

[Valerie Villars]

Caliban, I agree with your well thought out reply. I tend not to go into too much detail, as it's not the way I think, but the point of what I saw is that the man made constructs were laughable and unimportant compared to the big G experiencing his/her self. That mankind had gone off into ridiculous tangents led by haste and greed.

Cathedrals were more stunningly beautiful than normal, for instance. Those had grace and majesty, but they were also man made constructs of spiritual, not materialistic, truths. Thanks for clarifying.

Valerie, not sure if you meant "haste" and greed, or hate and greed, but either one makes sense in regard to what's become of our relations with each other. Haste makes waste, right...

But yeah, when you have those moments of profound clarity it all just seems, well, like a waste. A waste of energy, creativity, and ultimately, beauty. You ever think how much beauty goes unexpressed in the world? Things we want to say to each other but we hold back (maybe rightly so), things we want to do but that get stultified...

Maybe this simulation theory is another way to make us seem "less than," or just worth nothing? Another way to make us feel not merely trapped, but totally futile?

Caliban, I actually did mean haste. I mean how much forethought or creativity or beauty goes into building a Target or a McDonald's compared to a gorgeous cathedral or a castle or a pyramid?

I don't think it's a simulation here, as much as it is a paler copy of higher realities. As to the why we are here, there are multitudes of reasons for many purposes; some to come and help others, some to learn, some to experience as a sort of living library and the reasons are infinite. I do believe we have been hijacked and some of us are here incognito, unknown even to ourselves, so as to protect our missions.

Ultimately, because creation goes on forever, we are here to help our brethren and give them a hand up and there are those above trying to give us a hand up. It's infinite.

¤=[Post Update]=¤



http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/matrix-rods.jpg

@ 43:48 Jerry Wills’ drawing triggered a recall of a recent events. Of late, I’ve been seeing a wider scope of things. When I was little and into my teenage years, it felt like I was part of a play and there was an audience watching.

I mentioned elsewhere that a friend and I had a pack that whom ever went first we’d touch base before moving on. It’s been two weeks since he passed. He was in my dreams and in my waking thoughts for several days before I learned the news. A couple of days later, he touched base with me. A lot was covered in a short amount of time. One thing was his advise to stay the path and that I was close. At the time I thought it was based on what he sees in my auric field. I saw what he was explaining. I took it to mean growth rather than physicality.

The auric visual was similar to Jerry’s model and what I’ve seen for the last several months. These rods were all around, only there were more of them. The angles had no pattern to them. Though, I assumed they were light beams. This house of mirror was/is endless. Fortunately, the rods have become more subtle so it doesn’t feel as congested. I figured the countless me(s) was a metaphor for aspects or parallel experiences.

My goal is to step out of this house of mirrors (matrix). I have a feeling it’s just a matter of focused intent. But what happens is within minutes I go from wide awake into a deep sleep that often lasts for hours.

So for now, I’ll gather the pieces and at some point they’ll fit together. http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/noidea.gif


http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/sphere-puzzle2.jpg

Running Deer, I do know when I focused intent, it propelled me into another reality and there were some pretty intense parts where I was sure I was playing a part. I just knew.

Then of course, after a while, it went away.

[Foxie Loxie]

Paula, so glad you "connected"! Ah.....the pieces!! I think I'm beginning to figure out why I never seem to "fit" in any situations I find myself in???? :confused:

It's o.k.! I'll just finish out this expanding part of my Soul Growth & move on to the next part!! :ROFL:

[RunningDeer]

Paula, so glad you "connected"! Ah.....the pieces!! I think I'm beginning to figure out why I never seem to "fit" in any situations I find myself in???? :confused:

It's o.k.! I'll just finish out this expanding part of my Soul Growth & move on to the next part!! :ROFL:

http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/balloon1.gif From one perspective, you get to create an original path for yourself. http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/balloons.gif

[Flash]

This is very interesting Paula. It reminds me of a "dream" which was not a dream (did not have the dream like parameters) I did after my father passed. One night, he came to get me for a trip in the desert, in a white car (similar to the one he had when i was small). We traveled on the sand for a while to arrive at a place where there were tubes by the hundreds, of different lenght, hanging from the sky. As if seeing the bars from Wills design from the inside, their endings.

My dad was always the one wanting to explain to his chidren who would listen (me lol) the raison d'être of things and the way things work, from a mechanical point of view or from a metaphysical.

So I knew he wanted to tell me about something and its workings. I never made the relation with the universe, the multiverse or with the wormholes or souls, until now. Interesting to say the least...

Few months later he came sitting in a chair. I was soooo happy to see him again. He did not talk at all, nor telepatically. But I suddenly felt sooooo much love, as if every single cell in my being had been dipped in a bath of love, it was incredible. It did change my views on life.

All there is IS love. All that remains IS love.




http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/matrix-rods.jpg

@ 43:48 Jerry Wills’ drawing triggered a recall of a recent events. Of late, I’ve been seeing a wider scope of things. When I was little and into my teenage years, it felt like I was part of a play and there was an audience watching.

I mentioned elsewhere that a friend and I had a pack that whom ever went first we’d touch base before moving on. It’s been two weeks since he passed. He was in my dreams and in my waking thoughts for several days before I learned the news. A couple of days later, he touched base with me. A lot was covered in a short amount of time. One thing was his advise to stay the path and that I was close. At the time I thought it was based on what he sees in my auric field. I saw what he was explaining. I took it to mean growth rather than physicality.

The auric visual was similar to Jerry’s model and what I’ve seen for the last several months. These rods were all around, only there were more of them. The angles had no pattern to them. Though, I assumed they were light beams. This house of mirror was/is endless. Fortunately, the rods have become more subtle so it doesn’t feel as congested. I figured the countless me(s) was a metaphor for aspects or parallel experiences.

My goal is to step out of this house of mirrors (matrix). I have a feeling it’s just a matter of focused intent. But what happens is within minutes I go from wide awake into a deep sleep that often lasts for hours.

So for now, I’ll gather the pieces and at some point they’ll fit together. http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/noidea.gif


http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Empower/sphere-puzzle2.jpg

[PathWalker]

Few months later he came sitting in a chair. I was soooo happy to see him again. He did not talk at all, nor telepatically. But I suddenly felt sooooo much love, as if every single cell in my being had been dipped in a bath of love, it was incredible. It did change my views on life.

All there is IS love. All that remains IS love.


Thank you for sharing this beautiful story.
It remind me of the movie Contact (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_(1997_American_film)) when the heroine is making contact with another being that appears to her as her father.
You can watch here (https://bmovies.cz/watch-contact-1997-1080p-online-free-bmovies/watching.html)at 1:55:55 .
Beautiful experience and story.

[Noelle]

On Jerry Wills' portal experience, it has a few of the same symptoms that are reported by people who have out of body experiences, including myself. Wills experiences falling off a cliff; with OBEs, it's described as sinking or falling into the bed or wherever one is laying down. Wills sees stars and galaxies whizzing by -- very common in OBEs. The intense pressure, well, I've only experienced it once. It was in an OBE in which I was reliving or remembering the reincarnation process. I describe it as an intense squeezing, though it was not painful.

I read an article last year, which I lost track of, that explains some sort of computer-like device seen by people who have taken Ayahuasca. If anyone knows anything about this, please chime in. There could be some connection with what they see and the simulation theory.

[Madeira]

I was reading this just before noticing this post...very interesting. Deja Vu by the way.

http://thelaymansanswerstoeverything.com/2013/01/scientific-proof-we-live-in-a-simulation/

[RunningDeer]

Few months later he came sitting in a chair. I was soooo happy to see him again. He did not talk at all, nor telepatically. But I suddenly felt sooooo much love, as if every single cell in my being had been dipped in a bath of love, it was incredible. It did change my views on life.

All there is IS love. All that remains IS love.
Flash, I have a similar experience when my son comes to touch base. We bask in the love; no words nor inquiry needed. Every now and again, I’ll send a wave packet with this’s and that’s of current happenings and ah-has. Other times, I let him know I understand that this place was way-WAY too dense for him.

[mountain_jim]

I was reading this just before noticing this post...very interesting. Deja Vu by the way.

http://thelaymansanswerstoeverything.com/2013/01/scientific-proof-we-live-in-a-simulation/

Really enjoying this article - thanks!

[Mike]

I'd heard of the concepts of "oneness", karma, non locality, telepathy, telekinesis, and so on ..many many times before I'd read 'The Holographic Universe'....but I never truly understood them (and more importantly how they were all connected!) until I finished the book. In fact, the holographic model explains virtually all elements of the so called paranormal....and in a beautifully simple, easy to read way.

The holographic model explains all of that perfectly. It makes so much sense that even now I have a hard time imagining it to be any other way.

Linda's presentation was powerful and moving. She's one of my all time favorites. But she is developing a sorta disquieting habit of using Goode, Wilcock, and Tompkins to back up her research. This isn't the first time she's done this.

I've really enjoyed all the personal stories shared on this thread!

[Valerie Villars]

I wish to share this very important video.

Linda explains what is holographic projection.
Reviews evidence from various scientists and contactees.
Including: Jerry Wills, Michael Talbot, Tom Campbell, David Bohm and others I forget to mention.

The video and the material enclosed is ground breaking and belief shattering.
Be prepared to peek into the matrix.


Linda Moulton Howe, Emmy Award-winning TV Producer and Reporter; Editor of the award-winning news website Earthfiles.com; and Investigative Reporter for Coast to Coast AM with George Noory on the iHeart Premiere Radio Networks opens up her investigations with human abductees and scientists about the possibility that our universe is Somebody Else’s computer simulation. Some people in the human abduction syndrome have reported that E.T.s describe our universe as a 3-D hologram projected from another dimension by a Super Intelligence. Quantum computer engineers and astrophysicists ask in scientific papers: “Are We Living in a Computer Simulation Universe?” On April 5, 2016, the Hayden Planetarium in New York hosted a debate on the question “Is the Universe A Simulation?” One of the panelists, James Gates, Ph.D., a theoretical physicist at the Univ. of Maryland said: “If the simulation hypothesis is valid, then we open the door to eternal life and resurrection and things that formally have been discussed in the realm of religion.” Human abductee Michael Talbot wrote in his 1992 book, The Holographic Universe, about what he learned from an alien.4FbD_ojWWXw

Oh my gosh. 9 and one half minutes in and she is my hero (I have lots or few depending on your perspective). Thank you so much.

17 minutes in and have a hard time differentiating the fact I worked with scientists all over the world, when i woke up. Interesting. I was in Communications. Continuing on.............

Guess what? Some people can't get hacked. Oh well, better days for us.

So, parts that gel. 29 minutes, etc. My Nordic with blonde hair and beautiful eyes was notable for his all over body tan, which didn't gel with the coloring. I knew it wasn't "normal". It either smacked of money or supernatural things. Or high tech. Continuing......

Ok, this is blowing my mind because at 35 minutes or so she starts quoting a Jerry, who refers to Peru. a bunch of guys from Machu Pichu showed up at the beginning of my experence. Actually it was guys and two women, both dark and beautiful.

[Caliban]

I read an article last year, which I lost track of, that explains some sort of computer-like device seen by people who have taken Ayahuasca. If anyone knows anything about this, please chime in. There could be some connection with what they see and the simulation theory.

I've never seen that "computer-like device," but a couple of times, on the Medicine, I've seen, rather something was shown to me that's very hard to put into words. It was like our whole reality was a block long and we keep going round the same block--with the same stupid, meaningless obstructions in our way every time we come around that same block. And this is what we had all gotten caught in.

It depends what one means by "computer simulation," but I didn't interpret it like a computer simulation. No, just that someone(s) has been fu--ing with our reality, probably for a long time. That's why things seem the same over and over, every day. I saw it as an error in perception that we were conned into. Over millenia we've accepted it and now we (usually) can't perceive anything else. That's what the plant medicines are there for.

[Valerie Villars]

"For instance, we do not learn to ride a bicycle by painstakingly memorizing every tiny feature of the process. We learn by grasping the whole flowing movement.The fluid wholeness that typifies how we learn so many physical activities is difficult to explain if our brains are storing information in a bit-by-bit manner. But it becomes much easier to understand if the brain is Fourier-analyzing such tasks and absorbing them as a whole."

I found the above quote in "The Holographic Universe" extremely interesting. It explains, for reasons unknown, why we would choose to be in a body. So much easier to understand and be a concept, then to just read about it.

[waves]

Tom Campbell might greet this thread with 'Hello free will awareness units of your individuated unit of consciousness of the larger consciousness system. How's your virtual reality going?'.

I watched Linda's video and excuse me for posting this before having read The Holographic Universe, but I'm wondering if there are irrefutable truths in BOTH in Michael's Holographic Universe Theory and Tom Campbell's Virtual Reality Theory despite being in conflict, or does one irrefutably negate the other? Is anyone here intimately knowledgeable about both theories and have any comments about how one inarguably supercedes the other?

I try to refresh my grasp of Tom's 'Theory Of Everything' that he calls his Big TOE with some regularity so more and more sinks in - there are 500+ 1-6+ hour lectures to find - and did so recently so numerous comments made in this thread about the nature of self, purpose and other jump out at me as conflicting with Tom's theory.

I'm leaping to one particular concept of his after reading the various references to continued communication with people who have passed. You won't understand the sense of it unless you grasp his concept of consciousness as information, that reality - to you - only exists because - you alone - 'render' it into the perception of the body you are directing from outside that body - not unlike rendering pixelated scenes to a character you move in a video game.

So one of the things I find disappointing to have to swallow despite Tom's foundational conclusion that all growth requires love, is that the ultimate nature of other people and relationship to yourself in his virtual reality looks inescapably eternally lonely. The 'others' in your life can only be as virtual as you - regarding family, the containers/bodies may be dna related, but the consciousness'es are not. At death, what and who seems so important and special in this lifetime fades as fast as a dream you had a year ago and couldn't even remember in an hour. 'Seeing' anyone again is just 'you' replaying the 'information' they were comprised of so far.

Tom hasn't said this, but seems to me that it means that the reason the original consciousness wanted to split into the parts in the first place - loneliness - is eternally inescapable. All us 'parts' may be slowly evolving back, thinking we're 'discovering' that our 'purpose' is to find our way back to 'source' but ultimately it's not a good thing to be 'one' when we all get there! So are we just doing this split/return/split/return over and over eternally??? Hope I'm missing something.

Anyway, I would appreciate no conjecture about this subject without clearly understanding Tom's reasons for reaching his conclusions. You don't have to know physics, but I am giving him the benefit of the doubt when he says that so far his theory is the only one that elegantly makes all the worst conundrums to physicists all fit together... and it's currently inarguable.

I really don't have any favorite videos of Tom's, there are a gazillion and he frequently uses the same analogies over and over.

Maybe this is good introductory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRdskT540aw

I guess he considers these some of the most controversial questions about his theory - includes the 'other' issue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwG8pB8OZRE

A recent 6 hour marathon - you can find many more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8yPhlpys6k

[A Voice from the Mountains]

I wish to share this very important video.

Linda explains what is holographic projection.
Reviews evidence from various scientists and contactees.
Including: Jerry Wills, Michael Talbot, Tom Campbell, David Bohm and others I forget to mention.

The video and the material enclosed is ground breaking and belief shattering.
Be prepared to peek into the matrix.

If you think about it, the ancient Hindu idea that reality is basically just a thought in the mind of God is not too far from what these scientists are finding. The biggest difference is that Hindus were focused upon the all-pervading nature of consciousness while scientists are interpreting their data through the lens of materialistic science and computer analogies.

Physical reality may be a sort of construct, but I believe our souls extend beyond the "simulation" and even have the power to directly change it if we're tapped in to the right "currents." I've had some experiences along those lines that frankly were disturbing to me. The saying "with great power comes great responsibility" takes on some heavy tones when you tap into the collective suffering and pain in the world. I'm thankful that our bodies and minds have been developed to shield us off from most of that, or people wouldn't be able to function on a daily basis. It may be a simulation of some sort but people take it deadly serious while they're here.

[Foxie Loxie]

waves....Love the way your mind works! :ROFL: Split/return/split/return! Interesting! If you ever come to a conclusion....puuleeeze let us know! :bowing:

[Gurudatt]

I agree with Linda to some extent. However, I believe the Holographic Universe is created by our Soul.

[mountain_jim]

New from Stephen Hawking post passing, and Thomas Hertog

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-06/stephen-hawkings-last-words-we-live-matrix



Instead of the 'standard' description of how the 'universe' unfolded (and is unfolding), the authors argue the Big Bang had a finite boundary, defined by string theory and holograms.

The new theory - which sounds simplistically like the world of the red-pill-blue-pill Matrix movies - embraces the strange concept that the universe is like a vast and complex hologram. In other words, 3D reality is an illusion, and that the apparently "solid" world around us - and the dimension of time - is projected from information stored on a flat 2D surface.

..

The Telegraph reports that Prof Hertog, from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KT Leuven), said:


"It's a very precise mathematical notion of holography that has come out of string theory in the last few years which is not fully understood but is mind-boggling and changes the scene completely."

Applied to inflation, the newly published theory suggests that time and "the beginning" of the universe arose holographically from an unknowable state outside the Big Bang.

[woomap]

So I just accidentally bumped into this clip today on Youtube and find it astoundingly informative, so decided to share it here with you all. Some of us here may've already watched it. But anyways!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FbD_ojWWXw

Linda Moulton Howe is very well-known in the Ufologist field who has also participated in some episodes of the Ancient Aliens series, as I remember. Throughout her speech, she told the stories of people, either scientists/researchers or abductees of aliens, including Tom Campbell and some quotes from Elon Musk, which show how it's totally possible that the universe we're living in is a giant hologram. And this hologram was very possibly created by a highly-developed alien race, who then was very possibly created by an even more developed aliens/beings.

So basically we're possibly living in a hologram, which is inside an even bigger hologram, created by aliens of different levels of dimensions.

There's also a part where an abductee who was also a scientist recalled his telepathic conversation with an alien and was shown that we humans are living in 1 of the 10 different holographic universes (possibly all created by this alien race). These 10 universes are divided in to 5 pairs. Within these pairs, one universe is always exactly opposite to the other, in all sorts of ways. For instance, time in our opposite universe flows backwards, so a human body will turn from old to young as it moves through this universe, which also explains the process of reincarnation. I find this very interesting.

Mrs. Howe also recommended 2 books ''The Holographic Universe'' by Michael Talbot and ''Wholeness And The Implicate Order'' by David Bohm, which I've been reading up and find very rich in information as well.

[Valerie Villars]

Lovely lady. I was shown the holographic nature of this existence, mostly regarding symbolism, music and books. I still don't know what to make of it or if it is true. I think in some ways, the code is not meant to be cracked, but that it, this life, is all about the choices we make. We seem to be tested all the time. That was and is purely my opinion. I'm not sure why. It's a very complex subject.

[Star Tsar]

Not LMH but on topic!


Suma Gowda

Tom Campbell | Is Our Universe A Vast Virtual Reality?

Published 4th July 2018

Suma interviews Physicist & Author, Tom Campbell in order to answer the following question is our universe a vast virtual reality? & He does so expertly!

q3sYt2jaWh0

[Delight]

I read a book long ago by Stephen Davis... Butterflies are Free to Fly. I loved the metaphor he described. Like Plato's cave. people are transfixed to a screen with a movie playing that they first believe is reality. Then the people realize the screen is a movie. They leave the theatre and enter the movie lobby where the people then congregate in various groups to discuss what it MEANS that we were transfixed to a movie. People move form one group to another with different takes. All kinds of activities take place in the lobby with infighting and relationships etc. comprising the milieu. There is a red EXIT sign in the corner under a door. Will anyone leave the theatre? There is an unknown there. WHO could leave? One reason to leave is becoming fed up with all the stuff that happens in the lobby.

I really think the observer effect can be seen as we each put emphasis on our beliefs and see how they arise as our experience. There are so many ways it is obvious that what we expect to see is what we do see and we GET that. WHEN you realize that we decide our experience, one does wonder what would be ideal. Then one realizes that everything has paradox... our experience is "real" and "unreal". There are layers and layers of structure to a SYSTEM that stretches out form FROM mind of man..... What anyone saw on screen was just a story. Any story about the story is a STORY. Waves create particular patterns but it takes a human to observe. IF we expect to SEE a particular spin, we will.

Our minds make this world. All the people arguing on alt media and discussing anything are not "observers" but actors for a story. IF they see themselves as observers and responsible, the story collapses. They are then standing apart form the lobby masses>Reality only exists when electrons making up that reality are being observed. All of this is a pattern offered. People have questions of strange inconsistencies. No one will agree any longer IMO. It is like coming to the end of a paradigm where all the thoughts are just canceling each other out and nothing makes sense any longer. Something "there" used to satisfy and no longer can. The world collective offering becomes insufferable. There is no creativity possible in this paradigm. It just repeats SOMETHING.

IMO people like David Icke and Jason Breshears understand the issue of people who are still entrenched in the lobby paradigm and cannot see the door.

I am walking OUT. There is a huge opportunity beyond the exit. We won't even start knowing anything until we meet God. I met God in the lobby.

Exploring the Holographic Universe with Stephen Davis

3JM7c5L0qzM

Part 2

teG1PrW0NNw

[Delight]

These are three of my favorite researchers of truth. This is a great discussion. It includes Jason Breshears describing his understanding of us: We are immortal Beings who are moving through this simulacrum. Some have become completely taken over by a program and at the same time, some people are USING this offering of the experience to develop oneself actually SUPPORTED by the construct.


Unslaved: Jason Chats with Michael Tsarion
11/9/2024
He's a legend in the community, an original researcher and author, Michael Tsarion and I have a great chat on his forum, Unslaved with David Whitehead, who has been on Archaix before. Check out Unslaved here- https://unslaved.com/

1Ilt6f0Ki8Y