View Full Version : The British Pedogate
Baby Steps
3rd August 2018, 12:40
The British Pedogate
Well, perhaps this has been done to death, not least on Project Avalon. Check out the excellent threads within this sub-category.
However perhaps there is a need for a go-to that contains as much as possible. Normies are subject to an increasing tide of credible coverage in the British Press, but what has not entered the mass consciousness (yet) is the idea that these are more than mere piecemeal scandals, the odd ‘bad apple’ politician, Priest etc.
This vile sickness penetrates the establishment, and PERSISTS because the elite is complicit in covering it up. Why? Because the Elite are engaged in this behaviour, it is a kind of right of passage for those wishing to cosy up to them. Almost obligatory.
Yet this behaviour or lust or drive is totally unnatural to most humans. There is no genetic reason for it to have evolved. It may be rooted in abuse creating abusers, but at a deeper level, there has to be an entity dimension to it. Either the behaviour brings in the entities, or the freewill human invites in the entity, which then drives the human in this direction, for esoteric reasons.
Then you have the question of what ‘entities’ are lurking within our elites. The evidence is voluminous, and looking at it properly will assist the normies to start asking the deeper questions.
I hesitated to start this due to time pressure, however the article (http://www.newslogue.com/debate/705/KimHolleman) I found was so comprehensive that I thought it worth sharing.
To all, please dump in here as much good information as possible. I know, once it is built up, it will be a resource.
There are so many strands worth including, just for starters:
- Jill Dando Murder (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?61853-Was-Jill-Dando-murdered-to-keep-lid-on-elite-paedophile-Ring&p=709206&viewfull=1#post709206)
- Jimmy Saville (see this excellent thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?50809-How-Jimmy-was-able-to-Fix-it----&p=568046&viewfull=1#post568046))
- The Churches
- The Thatcher cabinet pedo-ring
- May & Hague covering up the above
- The Royals
- MI5 vetting known Pedo’s
- Madeleine McCann (includes Podestas and a Freud)
- Gislaine Maxwell
- School abuse
- Mark Thompson
- Cyril Smith MP
- ‘British fight’ drops & campaigns
- Grooming gangs & ‘Tommy Robinson’
- Margaret Hodge, the Islington cover up
- Care home child prostitution
Baby Steps
3rd August 2018, 12:47
Kim Holleman
11 Sep 2017
The UK Pedogate and US Pizzagate Analogues
#Politics #PedoGate #PizzaGate #PrinceAndrew #JeffEpstein #BillClinton
We believe it-as long as it's the UK version.
The US “Pizzagate” as it has now become known, has its analogue in the recent pedophile scandal (https://www.npr.org/2015/05/21/408407168/revelations-of-british-pedophile-ring-spur-flood-of-abuse-reports?t=1533300544677)(s), involving the British elite (https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline), which included more (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-20516533) than one Knighted politicianand a former Prime Minister (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Edward+Heath+Child+Abuse&*), as well as Jeff Epstein friend (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/virginia-roberts-what-do-we-know-about-the-woman-at-the-centre-of-the-prince-andrew-sex-allegations-9958539.html), Prince Andrew (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/07/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-florida). The British media historically silenced (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/22/media-gagged-westminster-child-abuse-ring) and attempted to cover up (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/revealed-newsnight-emails-that-accuse-bbc-of-jimmy-savile-cover-up-8218971.html) and obfuscate facts (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/world/europe/westminster-vip-pedophile-claims.html), before finally admitting it was true.
New investigations (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/24/children-lambeth-councils-care-abused-industrial-scale-goddard-inquiry) have revealed pedophile rings operating out of multiple UK children’s care homes with half-hearted investigations and thwarted prosecutions spanning the last 30 years.
The UK has been plagued with child care home abuse scandals with multiple coverupaccusations made against Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, lost evidence, even suspicions that pedophile ring whistleblowers had been murdered. Similarly, some US mainstream media began misreporting and then “debunking” misrepresentations of the allegations uncovered in Wikileaks. Some mainstream responses to the information were focused on how the leaks occurred, rather than dealing with the content inside the materials.
Rise of the Citizen-Researcher
This left a gap in investigative journalism, prompting the rise of “Citizen-Journalists” and “Citizen-Researchers”. This independent, crowd-led investigation caught fire after it was revealed by researchers and other sites that Mark Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the NY Times -which was denying the evidence of an American pedophile scandal- was the same Mark Thompson, Former Director-General of the BBC, accused of lying to cover up the British Pedophile scandal.
Therefore, when the BBC published a contemporary article alleging the American pedophile scandal was fake, researchers saw it as an indication that the allegations were true. People began researching independently and started posting caches of information gleaned from the leaks on the front page of the internet an interesting twist, reddit banned the entire thread of research on the alleged criminal network. Ironically, rather than crush the investigation, it spread the investigation laterally, across multiple platforms. Citizen researchers disseminated the information and added to it, creating more researchers in the wake of the ban.
FBI Anonymous on 4chan
People had already began dialoguing online with “FBI Anon” on 4chan by late 2016. Among other things, the AMAs (Ask Me Anything) predicted a series of pedophile-related arrests taking place after the Presidential Inauguration on January 20, 2017. They described a wave of arrests, first dealing with low level arrests, moving on to mid-level arrests and ending in highest-level arrests.
It would be impossible to prove that this was a dialogue with a real “FBI insider”. True or not, this seemed to fuel a new wave of investigation, as researchers turned to older Wikileaks, cross referencing old materials with new leads and publishing even more information online.
Active Suppression
Since the onset of the independent investigations there has been active suppression of research on Reddit, 4Chan, and Twitter via mass post deletions and DDoS attacks, while “skeptical” articles claiming to "debunk" misstated and mischaracterized pizzagate theories begun appearing, pushing search results pertaining to the actual #Pizzagate research further and further down in search results online.
Historically, there has been documentary after documentary and scattered reports about pedophilia and ritual abuse in elite circles. Cory Feldman and Elijah Wood have discussed it in Hollywood. The “Boy’s Town“ allegations in Nebraska were outlined in the documentary Conspiracy of Silence. Similarly- a Jerry Sandusky victim claimed Sandusky was only part of a much larger pedophile ring, implicating the foster care organization Sandusky founded, The Second Mile Foundation, as well as Penn State University.
Internationally, US soldiers were told to ignore violent pedophilia in the Afghani military ranks even when it occurred on US military bases, as high-level Pentagon staffers were caught buying child porn while the investigation seemed to be swept under the rug. Global-level pedophilia coverups from within the Catholic church is contemporary to the alleged pedophilia ring going all the way to the top of UNICEF, also known as the United Nations Children’s Fund.
Six Degrees of Separation
The Madeleine McCann Abduction Investigation receives extended funding with a “new lead” on a suspect. Madeleine McCann’s abduction from Praia da Luz, Portugal made worldwide headlines in May of 2007. When the McCann’s became persons of interest, their PR Agent stepped down from the case, and Clarence Mitchell, stepped away from his position as Director of the Media Monitoring Unit at the British Government’s Central Office of Information, to represent the McCanns. He also signed on to work for FreudCommunications, run by Sir Clement Freud’s son, Matthew Freud. March 12-June 12
Sir Clement Freud invited the McCann’s to dinner in Portugal, 2 months after the abduction. His villa was situated 1/3 of a mile away from where Maddy was abducted. Once Sir Clement Freud was posthumously exposed as a long-time serial child predator who’d also had unusual contact with the McCann’s, police turned their attention towards him. When it was determined he was not in the country at the time of the abduction, online researchers began looking at everyone connected to Sir Clement Freud-and began wondering if there was a connection to the information uncovered in Wikileaks.
Sir Clement Freud’s son, Matthew Freud, is the great-grandson of “father” of psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud and is doubly related to the “father” of public relations, Edward Bernays. A former BBC Journalist, Matthew Freud was married to media-mogul Rupert Murdoch’s daughter, Elisabeth Murdoch. Both Matthew and his late brother, painter Lucien Freud had close relationships with Jacob Rothschild. Rothschild’s 50 year friend and American counterpart, the late David Rockefeller, funds the Partnership for Public Service through his organization, the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund. The Partnership for Public Service publishes the Presidential Transition Guide, which instructs the President elect how to act as President.
Freud Communication’s wunderkind Sara Latham- who moved on when the McCann’s spokesman joined Freud’s Communications- was a consultant to the Clinton Foundation, White House Staff to Bill Clinton, a communications advisor for Tony Blair, was appointed to Obama’s transition team in 2008 and became Senior Advisor to Hillary Clinton.
Most recently in the 2016 Presidential Election, Sarah Latham was John Podesta’s Chief of Staff.
A Small Club
https://i.imgur.com/EX5lJHU.png
Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts (17) and Ghislaine Maxwell
Virginia Roberts filed suit against Prince Andrew in 2011 and has for years maintained she was prostituted by Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured above) and Jeff Epstein (pictured below) and was raped by Prince Andrew as well as Alan Dershowitz. Though she was not successful in joining the current lawsuit of other women (Jane Does #1-4) against Jeff Epstein, she has nonetheless, been fighting in court for years.
https://i.imgur.com/eOVhPGf.jpg
The Daily Mail Prince Andrew, with an unnamed young woman, not his wife.
Prince Andrew and convicted/registered child sex offender, Jeff Epstein The Daily Mail
Jeff Epstein made sensational headlines across NY and Palm Beach when he was arrested and eventually convicted of solicitation of a minor and made to register as a child sex offender. He has faced multiple lawsuits regarding his sexual assault, rape and exploitation of underage girls. He has reportedly settled lawsuits from more than 30 "Jane Doe" victims since 2008; the youngest alleged victim was 12 years old at the time of her abuse.
The Guardian states:
In 2006, the FBI opened an investigation into allegations that Epstein had been paying for sex with underage girls at his Palm Beach mansion for years. By the following year federal prosecutors said they had identified 40 young women who may have been illegally procured by Epstein.
In 2008, however, the federal inquiry was dropped after Epstein negotiated a deal with prosecutors in which he agreed to plead guilty to a relatively minor state charge relating to soliciting paid sex with a minor – a 14-year-old girl. He served 13 months of an 18-month sentence and is now a registered sex offender.
Epstein and The Prince are close enough that Epstein actually paid off debts for Prince Andrew's ex wife, Sarah Ferguson, The Dutchess of York. According to the BBC, "in March 2011 - he [Prince Andrew] came in for a steady stream of criticism over his friendship with US tycoon Jeffrey Epstein, who was jailed for sex offenses. There were even calls for him to step down then."
https://i.imgur.com/fegR17w.png
Jeff Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Schildhorn/McMulllan
Virginia Roberts also sued Ghislaine Maxwell and that case was settled this year under confidential terms.
Ghislaine Maxwell supposedly worked as Epstein's madame. "She said she worked for a very wealthy gentleman called Jeffrey Epstein who was looking for a traveling masseuse and I'd get training and be paid large amounts of money," Roberts told the Mail.
"Jeffrey said he wanted to be my mentor," says Miss Roberts. "I felt that he and Ghislaine really cared for me. We'd do family things, like watch Sex And The City and eat popcorn.
"But it was a sick family. I was a paedophile's top girl, being trained up for a British Prince. He trained me to do whatever a man wanted.
https://i.imgur.com/QZisPKL.png
Ghislaine Maxwell at the wedding of Chelsea Clinton Getty Images
https://i.imgur.com/HrHrJ4R.png
Prince Andrew and President Bill Clinton NY Magazine
Bill Clinton is a known womanizer, but has also been accused of rape, sexual assault and unwanted sexual contact by many women, outlined here in The Washington Post's well organized guide to Bill Clinton's womanizing and different instances of him being accused of rape.
The relationship between Clinton, Epstein and Maxwell goes way back. New York Magazine's profile of Jeff Epstein before his incarceration for soliciting a minor, mentions all three in the following excerpt:
Friends of the two [Epstein and Maxwell] say that Maxwell, whose social life has always been higher-octane than Epstein's, lent a little pizzazz to the lower-profile Epstein. Indeed, at a party at Maxwell's house, her friends say, one is just as apt to see Russian ladies of the night as one is to see Prince Andrew. The Oxford-educated Maxwell, described by many as a man-eater (she flies her own helicopter and was recently seen dining with Clinton at Nello's on Madison Avenue)
What's curious here is that the NY Magazine profile of Jeff Epstein seems to oddly corroborate Virginia Robert's claims made during an interview by The Daily Mail, published by Gawker:
Roberts alleges that she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew three times, the first during a visit to London. "Andrew was making eye contact with me at every chance and concentrating on my plunging V-neck top," she told the Mail. "He didn't ask me anything about myself. I just sat there with a smile frozen on my lips. Ghislaine had whispered, 'The Prince seems really interested in you.'"
Roberts claims that Epstein paid her about $15,000 for sleeping with the Prince, the Mail reports. Also: "There is no suggestion that the Prince knew that Epstein paid her."
The second time she was coerced into having sex with the prince was at Epstein's Manhattan apartment, Roberts claims; the third alleged time was on Epstein's Caribbean island, where a group of Russian models were flown in for an orgy.
Of course, once his Epstein's allegations went to trial, it was also reveled by Gawker and confirmed in FAA flight logs (page 8) that Bill Clinton was on Jeff Epstein's plane nicknamed the, "Lolita Express" many times-as was Alan Dershowitz.
https://i.imgur.com/FHaLDBN.jpg
Federal Aviation Administration Flight Logs, Evidence in Edwards (Virginia Roberts) vs. Epstein
Virginia Roberts claimed Epstein made her have sex with Alan Dershowitz and others, including Britain's Prince Andrew, on multiple occasions. This suit was filed and Dershowitz denied all allegations. A countersuit was brought by Dershowitz against Robert's lawyers which ended in a settlement. The following portion of the joint statementis of particular note:
Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz have today settled their pending defamation claims in which Edwards and Cassell sued Dershowitz and Dershowitz counterclaimed against Edwards and Cassell. The case was about Dershowitz's public claims that Edwards and Cassell, as the attorneys for Virginia Roberts, had failed to perform the necessary due diligence before filing the allegations of their client, not whether the acts of alleged misconduct in fact occurred.
The federal non-prosecution agreement made at the time of Epstein's "sweetheart deal" organized by Alan Dershowitz-one of Epstein's "Dream Team" lawyers- excludes prosecution of those who allegedly procured minors for Epstein and also any power-brokers who may have molested them. Although Dershowitz wasn't a signatory to the plea agreement, the latest filings in Roberts's case against Epstein accuse Dershowitz of essentially negotiating his own immunity:
Dershowitz would later play a significant role in negotiating the NPA on Epstein's behalf. Indeed, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement that provided immunity from federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida not only to Epstein, but also to "any potential co-conspirators of Epstein". . . . Thus, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement with a provision that provided protection for himself against criminal prosecution in Florida for sexually abusing Jane Doe #3.
[Jane Doe #3: Virginia Roberts]
Given this context, does it seem reasonable that some of these cases of “VIP pedophile rings” might be connected?
Given the wealth of historical facts about all of these people, evidentiary court findings leading to convictions and statements and associations, is it really so impossible to think that Bill and Hillary Clinton and financial/political power-brokers John and Tony Podesta would be involved?
________________________________________
Kim Holleman writes about politics, media, and society for Artsci, Newslogue, and on Patreon, and is the American Editor at State Of Globe News Service. Visiting Scholar & Research Affiliate at MIT Media Lab (2013-2017).
Hervé
3rd August 2018, 20:31
Sickening: Jehovah's Witnesses accused of silencing victims of child abuse in the UK (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/25/jehovahs-witnesses-accused-of-silencing-victims-of-child-abuse-uk)
Sarah Marsh The Guardian, UK (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/25/jehovahs-witnesses-accused-of-silencing-victims-of-child-abuse-uk)
Sun, 25 Mar 2018 07:54 UTC
https://www.sott.net/image/s24/481493/large/Jehovah_sex_abuse.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/481493/full/Jehovah_sex_abuse.jpg)
More than 100 people have made allegations of mistreatment. © Alicia Canter
More than 100 people have contacted the Guardian with allegations of child sexual abuse and other mistreatment in Jehovah's Witness communities across the UK.
Former and current members, including 41 alleged victims of child sexual abuse, described a culture of cover-ups and lies, with senior members of the organisation, known as elders, discouraging victims from coming forward for fear of bringing "reproach on Jehovah" and being exiled from the congregation and their families.
A Guardian investigation also heard from 48 people who experienced other forms of abuse, including physical violence when they were children, and 35 who witnessed or heard about others who were victims of child grooming and abuse.
The stories told to the Guardian ranged from events decades ago to more recent, and many of those who came forward have now contacted the police.
They told the Guardian about:
An organisation that polices itself and teaches members to avoid interaction with outside authorities.
A rule set by the main governing body of the religion that means for child sexual abuse to be taken seriously there must be two witnesses to it.
Alleged child sex abuse victims claiming they were forced to recount allegations in front of their abuser.
Young girls who engage in sexual activity before marriage being forced to describe it in detail in front of male elders.
A solicitor representing some of the alleged victims said she believed there were thousands of complainants in the UK and that the people who have contacted the Guardian were "just the tip of the iceberg".
One alleged victim, Rachel Evans, who has waived her right to anonymity, claimed there was a paedophile ring active in the 1970s, although details of the case cannot be divulged due to a current investigation.
"Within the Jehovah's Witnesses there is an actual silencing and also a network where if someone went to the elders and said 'there is a problem with this' and they believe you, the whole thing will be dealt with in-house. But often these people are not dealt with, they are either moved to another congregation or told to keep their head down for a few years," she said.
Another victim, who did not want to be named, said she was abused by a ministerial servant (someone with congregational responsibilities) in the organisation in the 1970s.
"I was sexually abused many times a week from the age of three until I was 12. Congregation elders knew that when I told them, at 12, what had been happening. No steps were taken to tell the police. I had to tell three male senior figures what had happened. Imagine that? A young girl telling a bunch of men what this man did to me. I wasn't even allowed to have my mother there with me."
After she went to the police about what had happened, the person who abused her pleaded guilty and was eventually convicted. "The Jehovah's Witnesses should lose their charity status as they are not protecting children," she added. She said she had mental health issues as a result of what happened and how it was dealt with.
Jason Munro, another alleged victim of sexual abuse who waived his right to anonymity, could not give details of his case due to a current investigation but said:
"I am completely horrified by the Jehovah's Witnesses ... I didn't get support and I experienced 10 years of abuse. Elders knew in my teens about the abuse but it was never a case of 'let's get this person the professional help he needs'."
When a Jehovah's Witness experiences sexual abuse they are supposed to report it to elders, who are always men, who will take further action if there is a second witness to the offence. The perpetrator will then be called before a judicial committee if they admit abuse or if there is a second witness.
"This causes further trauma to the victim and coupled with the two-witness rule, is undoubtedly the reason that so many victims have never reported it," said Kathleen Hallisey, senior solicitor in the abuse team at Bolt Burdon Kemp, who is currently acting on behalf of 15 alleged victims.
She also noted that the problem with the two-witness rule in the context of sexual abuse was that there were rarely witnesses to it, "meaning that [these] reports ... are usually dismissed".
It has been reported that the headquarters of the Jehovah's Witnesses in the UK, the Watch Tower, holds a database of abuse allegations made within the organisation but has yet to hand it over to authorities.
The Charity Commission launched an investigation in 2013 looking into the Manchester New Moston congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, concluding that it did not deal adequately with allegations of child abuse made against one of the trustees.
The commission is still running an inquiry into the main government body of the group, the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain. This is examining the child safeguarding policy and procedures further.
Following the investigation into the Manchester New Moston congregation last year, the Watch Tower changed its policy so that victims are no longer required to confront their abuser face to face.
A former elder, who was asked to investigate a child abuse case in 2007, claimed he was urged not to contact the police, although it was decided that the perpetrator should not be assigned to work with children.
However, the then elder - who left in 2012 over how the case was handled - said that this rule was not followed by everyone and when he raised this as a concern he was told to back off.
"I hugely regret the fact that I wasn't able to do anything at the time and I didn't have the strength. And that lives with me," he said.
Other former Jehovah's Witnesses told how they were forced to share personal sexual experiences at a young age, after breaking rules set by the religion.
One woman, who wished to be anonymous, was called to a meeting with elders after she had sex at 15, which goes against the rule of no sex before marriage.
"This meeting was three older men and me, a scared 15-year-old, who had just had sex for the first time. They had to know all the details before they chose my punishment," she said.
"I had to answer questions like, did it hurt? Where were you? Did you enjoy it? I don't think any child that age should ever be in that situation."
A former elder described how a congregation responded when a 13-year-old girl had sex. A judicial committee was called, and she was disfellowshipped and eventually asked to leave her parents' house.
The Guardian also heard from those who described strict upbringings and a culture of hierarchy which meant physical and other psychological abuse were rife and often ignored.
Stephanie, a former Jehovah's Witness, said that when she reported her own experience of domestic violence she was told by elders to do nothing.
The accused "remained in the congregation with privileges and authority. Later, when I came out to the congregation elders as gay, they sent two men to my house ... and asked me in detail about sex and masturbation," she alleged.
Operation Hydrant, a British police investigation into allegations of non-recent child sexual abuse, said that it was dealing with 45 potential victims of child abuse within a Jehovah's Witness setting. It said allegations could be made by a third party which either identifies - or does not identify - a potential victim.
Based on the Guardian's findings, the commission said its inquiry into the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain, the Jehovah's Witnesses' governing body in the UK, was continuing and it encouraged anyone affected by safeguarding in congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses in England and Wales to come forward.
Hallisey said:
"Given the number of Jehovah's Witnesses in the UK, and what we know about the pervasiveness of abuse in the organisation, there are likely to be hundreds and probably thousands more victims. This is truly just the tip of the iceberg."
She said the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse should investigate.
"It is absolutely critical that IICSA investigates the Jehovah's Witnesses ... This is actually a public safety issue. The person knocking on your door or handing you literature in the street could be an accused or even admitted paedophile," she said.
An IICSA spokesperson said that while it was currently delivering its existing programme, the panel would "consider calls for a Jehovah's Witnesses-specific investigation carefully" as work progressed.
In a statement, the Jehovah's Witnesses said that safeguarding children was of the utmost importance. They said that a victim and their family had the right to report allegations of child abuse to the police, and that the principle of sufficient evidence was a scriptural rule not related to reporting an allegation of crime to the authorities. "Elders treat victims of child abuse with compassion, understanding, and kindness. Elders will conduct a scriptural investigation of every allegation of child sexual abuse," they said.
Related:
Jehovah's Witness elder abused girls as young as 12 for 14 years, raped woman (https://www.sott.net/article/281276-Jehovahs-Witness-elder-abused-girls-as-young-as-12-for-14-years-raped-woman)
Jehovah's Witnesses are paying $4K a day to hide details of child sex abuse by leaders (https://www.sott.net/article/368582-Jehovahs-Witnesses-are-paying-4K-a-day-to-hide-details-of-child-sex-abuse-by-leaders)
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?94769-Pizzagate-pedophilia-in-American-elite--with-links-to-related-threads-&p=1238874&viewfull=1#post1238874
KiwiElf
3rd August 2018, 20:58
Add former British Prime Minister, Sir Edward Heath to that... (and possible murderer of at least one boy on an infamous boating trip on Heath's yacht) - "vested interests" are still trying to keep a lid on that one - here's some related searches/links:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Edward+Heath+pedophile&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab
Eva2
4th August 2018, 18:05
I found this alarming and difficult to watch someone try to justify and "understand" this kind of behaviour.
XcZRb_2uedU
Baby Steps
5th August 2018, 11:33
Former Police Detectives Maggie Oliver and Jon Wedger exposing the endemic cover up of child abuse by the police. If you want to help it is so important that you like, comment, SHARE & follow this page for further updates. Please subscribe to Jon’s new YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKqhfy9RxCVYPQJRyHOZIEw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z01qB-HeYV8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tsy194wX04c
Baby Steps
5th August 2018, 11:44
MARGARET HODGE MP
Just how many children were abused in the Islington children’s home abuse scandal, and why did hundreds of children’s files mysteriously disappear in Islington ?
And yet more than three decades on we still do not know the truth …..
The main paedophile at the centre of the Islington child abuse scandal went on to abuse children across three continents.
Had allegations against Bernie Bain, the former head of the children’s home, been properly investigated and believed by Margaret Hodge in the 1980s countless children would have been spared
But was he the only paedophile to abuse those children? We think not, and furthermore we believe a paedophile ring made up of influential people from backgrounds such as the police and politics were instrumental in the systematic abuse
http://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/news/politics/islington-kids-homes-abuse-scandal-council-chief-forced-to-admit-we-were-culpable-as-he-apologises-25-years-on-1-5214976
https://theukdatabase.com/councillorspolitical-party-affiliated/westminster-scandal-114-secret-files-on-paedophile-cases-missing/more-than-10-politicians-on-list-held-by-police-investigating-westminster-paedophile-ring/the-civil-servant-in-the-home-offices-pie-funding-inquiry-and-his-academic-articles-on-boy-love/p-i-e/margaret-hodge-childrens-homes-abuse-connections-to-p-i-e/
I believe that Margaret Hodge is complicit in this scandal as she led the council during that period. She also allegedly had links to the Paedophile information exchange (https://theukdatabase.com/councillorspolitical-party-affiliated/westminster-scandal-114-secret-files-on-paedophile-cases-missing/more-than-10-politicians-on-list-held-by-police-investigating-westminster-paedophile-ring/the-civil-servant-in-the-home-offices-pie-funding-inquiry-and-his-academic-articles-on-boy-love/p-i-e/), a pressure group. More on this later.
It is no coincidence that Hodge is leading the charge on this fake manufactured 'Corbyn is an anti-semite' story. She is a deep state actor, so likely subject to some form of blackmail by MI5. The manufactured media circus is becoming a storm, yet ordinary Corbyn supporters know it is nonsense. So they are having an awakening. They are seeing that as the Tories implode, and Labour gets closer to power, the dirty tricks campaign against him is intensifying.
Why? Because Corbyn is clean, honest, anti war and likely to follow through on policy to tax the elite- and expose them. You therefore can see clearly who are deep state oriented within labour, by looking at what they say regarding anti semitism.
Corbyn is an mp in the same area , Islington. It is very likely that he knows all about the abuse, and Hodge's pivotal role in it.
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 11:23
EDWARD HEATH - PART 1 (https://undercoverinfo.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/edward-health-pie-file-in-missing-dossier-identifies-his-interest/)
https://i.imgur.com/ZseNDyt.jpg
Edward Heath: file in missing dossier identifies his interest/queries re. PIE
Posted on 4 August, 2015by Undercover1
For some years allegations had circulated that the late Tory prime minister Edward Heath had been involved with the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). Yesterday the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) announced that it would be investigating a possible cover-up by Wiltshire Police re complaints made against the former prime minster of sexual abuse. Today it was reported that a man alleged he was raped by Mr Heath when he was 12 years old. It is known as fact that Heath visited the Kincora Boys Home in Northern Ireland, the subject of ongoing investigation into child sex abuse (involving MI5, Ulster Unionist paramilitaries, etc). There was also the scandal involving a boys home on the Channel Islands – again a home that Heath regularly visited, together with Jimmy Savile, the entertainer who has been recognised as a serial paedophile offender. Now it has emerged that four separate police forces are investigating the allegations made against Heath: in addition to Wiltshire Constabulary, Kent Police (Operation Hydrant), Jersey Police (Operation Whistle) and the Metropolitan Police (Operation Midland) have each announced investigations. Meanwhile, UndercoverInfo can confirm the name and serial number of the file regarding Mr Heath and his interest/queries re PIE and which was included in the infamous 114 ‘missing files’, believed to have been part of a dossier originally handed to the Home Office by Geoffrey Dickens and subsequently ‘lost’ by the Sir Leon Brittan, the former Home Secretary (and alleged paedophile).
Update: Hampshire Constabulary has announced it has opened a fifth line of inquiry (no further details at this stage).
A. The Heath file
The file that names Heath and his interest/queries re PIE is codenamed CRI 85 0472/0007/001 (see image below). There is no indication what the file on PIE covers; whether it is about questions, or whether it has evidence, or why it is associated with Mr Heath.
This file was eventually passed to the Government’s records office on 5 March 1990 and included in the ‘114 files’ that were either destroyed or went missing as part of what appears, in retrospect, to have been a concerted cover-up.
B. The cover-up
The ‘Westminster paedophile ring’ was first looked into as a result of a dossier presented by the late Labour cabinet minster (later, Social Democrat MEP), Baroness Barbara Castle. Ms. Castle said she had been given copies of classified documents from the Home Office, proving that there was a secret investigation underway into child sex abusers in Parliament. Castle apparently claimed that Heath was one of those implicated.
After Ms. Castle had collated the dossier (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/372925/Final_Report_-_Annex_E_part_2.pdf), she handed it to Don Hale, the respected editor of her local newspaper, the Bury Messenger. Mr Hale later claimed that a “heavy mob” of Special Branch officers raided his office and confiscated the dossier a day after paedophile Liberal MP Cyril Smith had visited him to demand he bury the story. Labour MP Geoffrey Dickens then presented the Castle dossier (see ‘Appendix E’) to Sir Leon Brittan.
Some years later Leon Brittan claimed to have lost over 114 files that were alleged to have been about child sex abuse at Dolphin Square and Elm Guest House and PIE. (Brittan was named as an attendee at Elm Guest House by its late owner – Brittan’s Elm Guest House nickname was ‘Roger’.) These missing files were ‘disappeared’ or destroyed but may have been included in a larger list that were identified in a Government internal file that shows over 2000 files as being recorded ‘disappeared’ or missing.
However, a 23 page archived Government document includes details of all the 114 ‘missing’ files and lists the many MPs who raised questions about child sex abuse scandals.
Note: Scotland Yard is also reported to have handed to Leon Brittan (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-28125537) a dossier naming 15 members of a notorious paedophile group. This file is still unaccounted for (it is not the same file given to Brittan by Geoffrey Dickens) – see here. It’s possible that this file is the same one labelled “Edward Heath… Re. PIE”.
C. IPCC
Yesterday the IPCC issued a statement (https://www.wiltshire.police.uk/media/583/Op-Conifer-Statement-from-ACC-Mills/pdf/OpConifer_Statement_ACC_Mills.pdf) re Mr Heath. It said:
“This is an investigation into allegations that Wiltshire Police did not pursue a criminal prosecution when a person threatened to expose that Sir Edward Heath may have been involved in offences concerning children. In addition to this allegation, the IPCC will examine whether Wiltshire Police subsequently took any steps to investigate these claims. The allegations were referred to the IPCC by Wiltshire Police following allegations made by a retired senior officer.”
Superintendent Sean Memory of Wiltshire Police, who is leading the investigation for the force, later added: “The allegation is that a trial was due to take place in the 1990’s and information was received in that trial that Sir Ted Heath was involved in the abuse of children, and the allegation is from the result of that information that the trial never took place. A retired senior police officer has come forward towards the end of 2014 indicating that they were aware of this information. So between then and March this year, we have worked tirelessly to establish the facts of that allegation to a point where in March this year, we have made a mandatory referral to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is leading the investigation into whether we did in fact mishandle that case in the 1990’s.”
D. Allegations
1. Jersey
Jersey Police has also said that it was investigating Mr Heath. In a statement it said: “Sir Edward Heath does feature as part of ‘Operation Whistle’, currently investigating historical allegations of abuse in Jersey.” This follows the Jersey care inquiry (http://www.jerseycareinquiry.org/), which had been looking into allegations of abuse in the island’s care homes, including the Haut de la Garenne children’s home.
Sir Edward Heath visited Haute de la Garenne many times and reportedly would take young boys sometimes supplied by Jimmy Savile (another regular visitor to the home) for trips with him on his yacht, ‘Morning Cloud’.
From September 2007, Jersey police took 1,776 statements from 192 alleged victims, identifying 151 alleged abusers relating to the home, though only seven people have been successfully prosecuted.
The police investigation also examined allegations that children were murdered. In the course of the investigation a total of 65 teeth and around 100 charred fragments of bones were discovered. Most of the dental remains discovered have been identified as children’s milk teeth. Among more than 100 bone fragments found is a tibia from a child’s leg and what police believe is an “intact” adenoid bone from the ear of an infant. These were all retrieved from a fingertip search of the four cellars in the Home’s east wing. Shackles were also found in what was believed to have been a torture chamber.
2. Kent
Kent Police said that it had also received, today, an allegation of sexual assault by Heath in the 1960’s.
3. Westminster
According to Exaro, a sexually abused survivor, ‘Nick’, alleged that one of the perpetrators of abuse of which he was victim was the late Sir Edward Heath.
Operation Midland (via the Met Police) is looking at several allegations.
4. N. Ireland
Heath was also a visitor to the notorious Kincora boys’ home in Northern Ireland, where child sex abuse was rife and was allegedly used as a blackmail tool by MI5.
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 11:44
BRITISH FIGHT
Who are they? They use 'Anonymous' style imagery in their videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQixcS61W0Q
The facebook group is 'Aslan's Army'
There are some heavy hitters on there, and it is looking like they will be a nexus for British leaks from within the establishment. I have been told that the scale of the abuse and the figures involved is known by many within the Police, IPCC, and Judiciary. Detailed investigations have taken place and the decision has been made to suppress the information until the big wigs/perps are dead.
This is a classic delay/suppression and many are unhappy with this. Hence the leaking.
British fight/Aslan's Army appear to be right wing/Q & Trump loving 'patriots' with a strong strand of Tommy/Islamophobia together with Zionism.
What matters is that they have info, that they are sharing, and they are researching constantly. Their aim is to expose the corruption, and all power to them with that
The following lists are of people who have had convictions, so these are not 'allegations':
COMPILATION 1 - LABOUR (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612384372488095/)
COMPILATION 2 - TORIES (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612386535821212/)
COMPILATION 3 - The Rest (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/613338095726056/)
Parliamentary Paedo Rogue's Gallery (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612017929191406/)
They have started a political party - see below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZugkAh2Quek
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 12:06
TED HEATH - PART 2
Who was Victor Rothschild?
https://i.imgur.com/BwlQu2i.jpg
The following is from 'British Fight' - treat with caution, research and verify....
Who was Victor Rothschild?
What happened to the castle dossier officially?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/627267544333111/ (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/627267544333111/)
This post explores 15 points we have identified to attempt to answer BF's question: see attached Graphic for guide.
1: Victor Rothschild. Born 1910 died 1990. 3rd Baron Rothschild, senior executive at Royal Dutch Shell and N.M Rothschild and sons, Victor spent his life at the pinnacle of British Society. He advised both the Heath and Thatcher governments, and was known as “the black bag man” because of his control of funding for intelligence covert ops: even more remarkable because Rothschild was a Labour party Lord. Rothschild had his fingers in MANY pies. The following points explore these connections.
2: Soviet Russia. For Decades, speculation has centred around Victor Rothschild, and whether he was the “5th Man”. As a member of Cambridge Apostles, Rothschild knew Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, Anthony Blunt, and John Cairncross. Several researchers believe Rothschild was “the 5th Man” and acted to ensure secrets reached Soviet ears: perhaps to maintain the “balance of power” for his own agenda… including investigative author Roland Perry, who wrote “The Fifth Man” in 1994, implicating Rothschild as a Soviet asset based on interviews with anonymous KGB veterans in Moscow. However, with the key evidence locked away behind British National Security, the definitive proof has proved elusive. What it needs is a whistle-blower… enter British Fight.
3) Anthony Blunt. Blunt, an Art Historian, was caught and confessed to being a KGB spy in 1964. This was kept secret for a further 15 years, until Margaret Thatcher publicly exposed him in 1979. Like Guy Burgess, Blunt was known to be homosexual, which was a criminal activity at that time in Britain. Both were members of the Cambridge Apostles (also known as the Conversazione Society), a clandestine Cambridge discussion group of 12 undergraduates, mostly from Trinity and King's Colleges who considered themselves to be the brightest minds in the university. Many were homosexual and Marxist at that time. Amongst other members, also later accused of being part of the Cambridge spy ring, were the American Michael Whitney Straight and Victor Rothschild who later worked for MI5. Rothschild gave Blunt £100 to purchase Eliezar and Rebecca by Nicolas Poussin. The painting was sold by Blunt's executors in 1985 for £100,000 (totalling £192,500 with tax remission[) and is now in the Fitzwilliam Museum.
During those 15 years, it is believed the British ran Blunt as a double agent, and this deception was enhanced by giving him work via the Royal household. When he was exposed, the Queen stripped him of honours and cast Blunt out. Victor Rothschild's status in Royal circles remained beyond question.
4) The Queen Mother. Anthony Blunt was actually a cousin of the Queen Mother. And this fact was useful to Victor Rothschild, who was known in intelligence circles he became known as “the black bag man”, as he controlled the funding for Black Ops. So trusted was Blunt by the Queen Mother than he was tasked to go to Germany and retrieve all the incriminating evidence of Royal support for Nazi’s, especially letters from the shamed and deposed Edward VIII. Leverage like that was always useful to a man like Rothschild and what he knew about the Royal family certainly made sure they protected him when Blunt was exposed.
Another Royal scandal with Rothschilds fixing fingerprints was exposed in a book, “the Kincora Scandal”, that connects Lord Dickie Mountbatten to a child prostitution vice ring in Belfast, Ireland. Authorities failed to intervene at the Kincora care home for boys until 1981, despite reports over the years of child sexual abuse.
The operators of the Kincora child prostitution ring were eventually convicted in 1981 of the RITUAL sexual abuse of defenceless young boys who were sold like prostitutes. No charges were ever brought against the VIP customers of royals, politicians, lawyers, and judges. Belfast citizens had their own reasons to celebrate, quite outside of the question of Irish unification and self-government, when Prince Philip's paedophile uncle, and Prince Charles mentor, was killed by a an IRA bomb planted in his boat.
5) Ted Heath was Prime Minister of Great Britain 1970-74 and leader of the Conservative party 1965 to 1975. Since his death his connections to Jimmy Saville and child abuse have become notorious, although to this day the establishment continues to maintain a wall of denial and persecutes whistle-blowers of Heath’s crimes. Rothschild was his advisor, and certainly would have known about his proclivities. Connections between Rothschild and Heath go back almost 30 years before, to the friendship Heath developed with the Seligman’s, an elite family who were close friends of the Rothschilds. Knowing Heaths connections to pre-war Nazi Germany, and almost certain recruitment by the BND (German Intelligence) Rothschild’s compromising knowledge of Heath would have given him enormous leverage. Victor Rothschild is also believed to have been the main recruiter for MI6 in the post year wars, and may have recruited Heath direct from Cambridge, before Heath even joined the Conservative Party.
6) Heute de le Garenne. The notorious Jersey children’s home where multiple reports of child abuse have emerged, as well as stories of Heath taking boys off in his Yacht who never returned (raped then murdered and dumped at sea). Later, Jimmy Saville was intimately connected to Heute de le Garenne and is believed to have procured children for Heath during the 1970’s.
7) Margaret Thatcher. Leader of the conservative party 1975-1990 and Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990, Thatcher was a revolutionary against the established order, whose neo-liberal economic policies sought to drag Britain out of the moribund economy of the 1970’s. Rothschilds support was vital to this endeavour and the support of the city. At the same time, Thatcher was certainly aware of going ons amongst MP’s and probably approved the suppression of compromising information.
8) Leon Brittan was home Secretary in 1984, when MP Geoffrey Dickens brought him a dossier naming @25 establishment political paedophiles. Brittan betrayed Dickens and repressed the dossier: it is impossible to believe he did this without Thatcher’s consent. In 1988 Labour MP John Mann brought a copy of the same Dossier to Police in Lambeth in another attempt to get the Dickens Dossier exposed, but again it was repressed from the top. There is speculation Brittan himself was a political paedophile, and again, Thatcher would have been briefed on this.
9) Barbara Castle is the author of “the Castle Dossier”. A Labour peer, Baroness Castle of Blackburn realised there was elite level paedophilia in parliament and started to put together a dossier of information. Many believe she did her work too well!
10) Castle passed the Dossier to the editor of her local paper Don Hale. He went on the record to speak about these events after the fact. Giving the Dossier to Hale was a poor idea by Castle, as within hours Hale was visited by…
11) Cyril Smith. Smith was a liberal MP, a fat pig of a man, who was later exposed as a paedophile. His name most likely was one of those featured in the Castle Dossier: Ted Heath was certainly another. Smith went to see Hale hours after Castle handed over the Dossier. He tried to soft soap Hale and persuade him to do the “right thing” by passing the Dossier to him. Hale refused and kicked him out of his office, but this victory was to be short lived as…
12) Special Branch, the elite Police squad from Scotland Yard, then visited Hale and pressured him seriously, with all sorts of threats and menaces, including a long stretch in Prison. It was more than Hale could take, and he handed the Dossier over, to be buried for many years, off the back of Officers citing ‘national security’.
13) The Castle Dossier: has become a legendary treasure trove of elite paedophilia. Not only does it expose those who were active political paedophiles in the 1970’s and before, those names also sponsored and protected modern politicians, who equally assisted to repress information. The Castle Dossier is said to contain which listed 16 MPs along with senior policemen, headteachers and clergy, and explore attempts by members of “PIE” (Paedophile information exchange) to infiltrate the government. The dossier is thought to also attempts by the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) to infiltrate government, while seeking funding and trying to persuade MPs to legalise sex with children. As well as key members of both the Commons and Lords, the Dossier is also thought to name over 30 prominent businessmen, public school teachers, scoutmasters and police officers with links to PIE. But who has the Dossier now? We know a name that claims to know…
14) British Fight: our favourite intelligence insider group, is telling us they have the Castle Dossier, and want to release it! But in order to do so, British Fight needs to be sure the exposure will be big enough the establishment will be forced to respond. The Castle Dossier is only a part of BF’s information: British Fight has a lot more to release: but to actually get this notorious Dossier into the light of day will be devastating. He needs our help!
15) Four cities: 12 tunnels. British Fight has placed a cryptic hint in front of us. Research continues to try to narrow this down. At the moment, our best estimation, based on the weight of evidence Research Group has sifted, is:
London: Belfast: Manchester: Glasgow.
We are unsure as to WHICH tunnels BF is mentioning (there are MANY) but all four cities have extensive tunnel systems. In addition, the Manchester canal system make all four cities into port cities that would facilitate the covert movement of people. Based on local stories, we believe the Lanyon Tunnels in Belfast are likely involved. Eleven more tunnels to find! Further info-drops from British Fight may revise/expand our conclusions in this area.
So: Who was Victor Rothschild?:
An elite “fixer” of the highest level who exerted enormous control over the British Establishment, and whose activities expose many scandals that reveal how power has operated in Britain. This has resulted in the troubled nation Britons live in today: and that British Fight is determined to set free: through TRUTH!
#AslansArmy #BritishFight #MBGA #wwg1wga #WhoWasVictorRothschild
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 12:32
Add former British Prime Minister, Sir Edward Heath to that... (and possible murderer of at least one boy on an infamous boating trip on Heath's yacht) - "vested interests" are still trying to keep a lid on that one - here's some related searches/links:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Edward+Heath+pedophile&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab
Many thanks - an excellent Mainstream news article (The Independent) that merits reproduction:
Sir Edward, who led a Conservative government in the early 1970s, died in 2005 aged 89 ( PA )
Sir Edward Heath would have been interviewed under caution to hear his account of seven allegations against him, the Operation Conifer report states.
The claims, between 1961 and 1992, relate to a period when Sir Edward was MP for Bexley, MP for Sidcup and MP for Old Bexley and Sidcup.
He was also Lord Privy Seal for two of the allegations, leader of the Conservative Party for one, Father of the House for one and Secretary of State for Industry, Trade and Regional Development for another.
The allegations are:
Allegation 1
Date of offence: 1961
Date reported: April 2015
Location: The Metropolitan Police Service area
Office: MP for Bexley, Lord Privy Seal
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly raped and indecently assaulted a male, aged 11, during a paid sexual encounter in private in a dwelling.
Allegation 2
Date of offence: 1962
Date reported: August 2015
Location: Kent
Office: MP for Bexley, Lord Privy Seal
Summary: Sir Edward, in the company of an unknown adult male, allegedly indecently assaulted a 10-year-old boy during a chance encounter in a public place.
Allegation 3
Date of offence: around 1964
Date reported: June 2016
Location: Sussex and the Metropolitan Police Service area
Office: MP for Bexley, Secretary of State for Industry, Trade and Regional Development
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly indecently assaulted a 15-year-old boy during three paid sexual encounters.
Allegation 4
Date of offence: 1967
Date reported: August 2015
Location: Guernsey
Office: MP for Bexley, Leader of the Conservative Party (Opposition)
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly indecently assaulted a 15-year-old boy, not known to him, in private during a chance encounter in a public building.
Allegation 5
Date of offence: 1976
Date reported: February 2016
Location: Jersey
Office: MP for Sidcup
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly assaulted, over clothing, an adult male during a chance encounter at a public event.
Allegation 6
Date of offence: about 1992
Date reported: January 2016
Location: Wiltshire
Office: MP for Old Bexley and Sidcup, Father of the House
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly indecently assaulted an adult male after consent was withdrawn, in what had been a paid consensual sexual encounter in a hotel.
Allegation 7
Date of offence: Between 1990 and 1992
Date reported: August 2015
Location: Wiltshire
Office: MP for Old Bexley and Sidcup
Summary: Sir Edward allegedly indecently assaulted a male, aged between 12 and 14 years, who was not known to him, in private during a chance encounter in private gardens.
The report states that there is “undermining evidence” for allegation seven, though Sir Edward would still have been interviewed about it under caution.
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 14:26
PETER BALL (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4162372/Prince-Charles-wrote-padeophile-bishop.html)
https://i.imgur.com/rtqvwdZ.jpg
Revealed: Charles' dozens of letters to 'calculating' paedophile bishop as victims demand they are made public
• Prince Charles is believed to have written to paedophile bishop Peter Ball
• Ball was jailed two years ago for using his position to groom 18 young men
• The former Bishop of Gloucester exchanged letters with Prince Charles
• Clarence House stressed the letters are not connected with Ball's case
By TOM KELLY and REBECCA ENGLISH FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 23:59, 26 January 2017 | UPDATED: 01:06, 27 January 2017
Victims of a paedophile bishop last night called for dozens of letters he received from Prince Charles to be made public.
Extensive correspondence is understood to exist between the future king and Peter Ball, the 'calculating' former Bishop of Gloucester, who was jailed after admitting exploiting his position to groom and abuse 18 young men.
The prince's letters now have been handed to an independent inquiry into the case, launched after Ball was convicted two years ago.
Victims of paedophile bishop Peter Ball, left, have demanded that correspondence between himself and Prince Charles, right, is made public although Clarence House insists there is nothing in the letters which is relevant into the church's handling of Ball's case
It is not clear what role, if any, they will play in the inquiry which is examining the Church's handling of the Ball case, but Charles has not given any evidence to it either formally or informally nor has he or his team been asked to.
The content of the letters is unknown, but in a statement yesterday, Clarence House said they believed there was nothing in them which pertained to the case.
A spokesman for the prince said: 'We do not believe that the letters have any bearing on the issues before the inquiry, but we have not objected to them being shared for their consideration.'
Royal sources insist it would be perfectly normal for the future king to write to the priest, who in 1992 became Bishop of Gloucester, the diocese in which Charles' country home, Highgrove, sits.
One said that the existence of letters between the two simply reflected their 'long-standing acquaintance'.
It is not clear if the prince continued to write to Ball after his well-publicised earlier arrest and police caution for gross indecency against a 17-year-old boy in 1993.
Ball escaped prosecution for this offence, despite investigators knowing of 'many' more allegations against him, after the police received dozens of supportive letters and calls from MPs, former public headmasters, JPs and even a Lord Chief Justice.
At the time his lawyers also told the police they had a letter of support from a member of the Royal Family, but prosecutors said they had not seen this correspondence and there is no evidence that this letter even existed.
However, Ball clearly did continue to enjoy cordial relations with the royals as he read the homily at the funeral of the father of the Duchess of Cornwall in 2006.
The letters from Charles are understood to have been handed to the Church of England's independent inquiry, which is being led by former council chief executive Dame Moira Gibb.
A Church of England spokesman said: 'We are supplying the inquiry with all information relevant to the inquiry's purposes as set out in its Terms of Reference.'
The Government's separate child abuse inquiry is also due to investigate whether there were 'inappropriate attempts by people of prominence to interfere in the criminal justice processes' after Ball was first accused of child sexual offences 24 years ago.
Phil Johnson, one of Ball's victims and chairman of the Minister and Clergy Sexual Abuse Survivors group, last night called for the letters to be made public in the 'spirit of openness.'
He said: 'I think the victims have a right to know what is in them. They may of course just be innocent letters between friends. But given the grave concerns about how the case was handled, the public also have a right to know what the future head of state wrote to Ball for the avoidance of any doubt.'
After his second arrest in 2015, Ball claimed his victims had been 'spiritually uplifted' by his treatment of them. The court heard how he targeted young men seeking spiritual instruction on the Bishop's 'Give a Year for Christ' scheme.
He changed his plea at the last minute and admitted to offences against 18 teenagers and young men between 1977 and 1992. He was sentenced to 32 months for misconduct in public office and 15 months for indecent assault, to run concurrently.
The lawyer for some of those he abused said the way establishment figures closed ranks around him had 'compounded his victims' anguish'.
Two years ago, 27 letters that Charles sent to ministers between September 2004 and April 2005 were published after a decade-long legal battle over their release that went to the Supreme Court.
DISGRACED CLERIC RENTED HOUSE ON DUCHY LAND
Disgraced bishop Peter Ball reneged on a deal to move abroad to escape prosecution in 1993, and instead rented a house from the estate of his ‘friend’ Prince Charles.
The cleric told police he would live with nuns in France in return for receiving the caution as part of an alleged agreement with a ‘sympathetic’ detective who wanted to help the church avoid the scandal of a criminal trial. It meant Ball was not prosecuted until October 2015.
After resigning as bishop in 1993, Ball moved to Manor Lodge, in the Somerset village of Aller, a property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, the private estate headed by Charles. He later publicly praised the ‘wonderfully kind’ Charles who he said ‘allowed me to have a duchy house’.
The detail has come to light from a report written by Brian Tyler, a former police officer-turned-priest who Ball hired to work as a private detective.
In it, he wrote: ‘It is needless to point out that having secured the caution on one offence and knowing the file has been closed, he has “welshed” in his promise to me, and the police, to leave the country.’
Royal sources made clear last night that Charles has no involvement in the commercial decisions on who is renting Duchy properties.
Baby Steps
6th August 2018, 16:09
EDWARD HEATH - PART 3
What David Icke has said since 1998 about paedophile and child killing Prime Minister Ted Heath is backed-up here by barrister Michael Shrimpton, an Intelligence and national security consultant, from his own contacts and inside experience
By David Icke
Michael Shrimpton says that Prime Minister Heath (1916 – 2005) was a paedophile who murdered his young boy victims or had others do it, often by throwing them into the sea after Heath had abused them on his yacht.
The record-breaking paedophile and BBC 'star' Jimmy Savile supplied boys for Heath - many of them from the Jersey children's home, Haut de la Garenne, with the support of those who ran the home.
Savile at Haut de la Garenne.
These facts were covered up by Heath Cabinet Secretary John Hunt, Baron Hunt of Tanworth, who Shrimpton says was also a paedophile. Hunt was appointed by the Queen to be a Companion, Knight Commander and Knight Grand Cross of the British Order of chivalry known as the The Most Honourable Order of the Bath of which the Queen is the head and Prince Charles the Grand Master. Hunt was also given a Papal Knighthood by Pope John Paul II - so was Jimmy Savile who was also knighted by the Queen.
Savile and Hunt were both given a Papal knighthood by the biggest child-abuse network on Planet Earth - the Roman Catholic Church (Church of Babylon relocated).
Jimmy Savile was a close friend of Lord Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from the 1960s and this continued for decades AFTER the cover up of Heath's paedophilia and child murder in league with Savile. You mean they didn't KNOW? Is someone having a laugh? British Intelligence didn't know? Ditto.
What's more ... AFTER the Heath-Savile cover up, Savile became such a close friend of Heath's successor and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and her husband Denis that he was invited to be with them on New Year's Eve every year for more than a decade.
Thatcher's government and circle of associates and aides was alive with paedophiles including Chester MP Peter Morrison, a close aide to Thatcher from 1975 to 1990. He was a notorious paedophile, well known to colleagues and the media, and yet Thatcher and her Cabinet and inner circle did NOTHING while he was abusing boys in North Wales children's homes and elsewhere. Anyone in that circle MUST have known. Thatcher minister Edwina Currie wrote in her published diaries:
'One appointment in the recent reshuffle has attracted a lot of gossip and could be very dangerous: Peter Morrison has become the PM’s PPS[Parliamentary Private Secretary]. Now he’s what they call a 'noted pederast', with a liking for young boys; he admitted as much to[Conservative Party chairman] Norman Tebbit when he became deputy chairman of the party but added' 'However, I’m very discreet' - and he must be! She [Thatcher] either knows and is taking a chance, or doesn’t; either way, it’s a really dumb move.
[Conservative MP] Teresa Gorman told me this evening (in a taxi coming back from a drinks party at the BBC) that she inherited Morrison's (woman) agent, who claimed to have been offered money to keep quiet about his activities. It scares me as all the press know, and as we get closer to the election someone is going to make trouble, very close to her indeed.'
Morrison with Thatcher
I named Edward Heath as a serial paedophile and child killer in my book,The Biggest Secret, first published in 1998 – seven years before he died. I also named him and his Chancellor of the Exchequer Anthony Barber as practicing Satanists, as I did the leading members of the royal family. Heath was read what I said by an excuse for a 'journalist' days after publication and he did nothing because to do so would have had the truth exposed in court – as it would be now if anyone from the Thatcher cesspit wants a go. Michael Shrimpton mentions Barber in this interview as being in league with Heath and Cabinet Secretary Hunt.
If Operation Fairbank, the police investigation into political and 'elite' paedophilia, does not make arrests of big political and royal names so they can be questioned under caution then it, too, will be shown to be a cover up given the evidence that mounts all the time.
Michael Shrimpton goes on to talk about what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what Shimpton says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.
I can’t confirm what he says about Madeleine or Cook but for sure I can with everything else with regard to Heath, Savile and the Conservative Party and government. Nor do I agree with all of his assumptions about who was behind it all, and certainly not that British Intelligence are the ‘good guys’. But it is very interesting information very much worth hearing.
Michael Shrimpton is the author of the book, Spyhunter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNelt33QP_8[/url]
I once had an extraordinary experience with former prime minister Ted Heath. Both of his eyes, including the whites, turned jet black, and I seemed to be looking into two black holes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryvvNrcMh-c
Michelle Marie
6th August 2018, 18:09
@ Baby Steps...
Yes..."an entity dimension to it."
These are the "powers and principalities" that can take us over and use us to do their bidding. Fame, fortune, and powers are the temptations that lead one into their traps. They surgically remove the conscience, or the will to do what's right. They've created cycles of abuse.
We are here to take a stand and end these cycles of abuse.
The Truth Troops are rallying to bring this stuff to the light of awareness so that the cycles can be cauterized and permanently ended.
Thanks for helping with this awareness. :sun:
MM
Mark (Star Mariner)
6th August 2018, 19:08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNelt33QP_8[/url]
I don't doubt what he says about Heath, I've heard the same stories consistently for years. Heath's yacht "Morning Cloud" was aptly called 'Morning Sickness' by his security detachment... Go figure.
But he's selling some other, pretty weird stuff here – British Intelligence are clean apparently, whiter than white, and everything's the fault of the Germans. I've not heard the theory that Sandy Hook was the Germans (via Mexico!).
And M15/M16 don't do murder, or evil schemes involving children and blackmail?
Don't buy that for a second, especially considering Kincora.
Former London Mayor Ken Livingston himself confirmed in an interview that Kincora was "where boys were being abused, and MI5 was filming it because they were hoping to be able to blackmail senior politicians in Northern Ireland".
Rt4a9ie5MGk
Michelle Marie
7th August 2018, 00:33
Former Police Detectives Maggie Oliver and Jon Wedger exposing the endemic cover up of child abuse by the police. If you want to help it is so important that you like, comment, SHARE & follow this page for further updates. Please subscribe to Jon’s new YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKqhfy9RxCVYPQJRyHOZIEw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z01qB-HeYV8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tsy194wX04c
John Wedger -- A MUST SEE video.
MM
Mark (Star Mariner)
7th August 2018, 14:42
John Wedger -- A MUST SEE video.
MM
Thank you, amazing guy. It's exactly people like John Wedger - who has witnessed institutional corruption first hand - who can turn this tide. :heart:
Hervé
7th August 2018, 19:59
UK cop gets 16 years after colleagues view footage of him raping a baby (https://www.rt.com/uk/435318-sexual-assault-police-officer/)
RT (https://www.rt.com/uk/435318-sexual-assault-police-officer/)
Tue, 07 Aug 2018 19:19 UTC
https://www.sott.net/image/s24/482071/large/5b698ae3fc7e9326208b456b.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/482071/full/5b698ae3fc7e9326208b456b.png)
PC Dean Roberts, 48 © South Wales Police
A police officer has been sentenced to 16 years in jail for raping a baby. PC Dean Roberts, 48, was caught by his own colleagues after he filmed himself abusing the child before sending the footage to other pedophiles.
Roberts' crime was exposed after the arrest of a fellow pedophile, lawyer John Guess, led detectives to their colleague. The pair planned to jointly abuse children and share footage of their crimes, Cardiff Crown Court heard.
The now ex-police officer admitted to a litany of charges that included rape, sexual assault of a child, as well as possession and distribution of indecent images of children.
In court, the mother of Roberts' victim said: "I can never forget the knock on my door and my whole world just falling apart. It was just like being hit by a bus. We will always have to live with the consequences."
Upon handing Roberts his sentence, Judge Recorder of Cardiff Eleri Rees QC stated: "The victim was particularly vulnerable because of her extremely young age. She was helpless to defend herself although the footage indicates she was awake and in real discomfort."
Guess, 43, Roberts' accomplice and a lawyer for the Welsh government, was jailed for 26 years for sex crimes against children.
The investigation has also led to arrests overseas.
Following the sentencing of Roberts and Guess, Detective Superintendent Wendy Gunney said:
"Today's sentences reflect the gravity of the crimes that have been committed. The two people responsible for the appalling abuse of a number of very young children have now been brought to justice.
"The investigation uncovered extremely disturbing child abuse evidence and the guilty pleas have ensured that the jury were spared from viewing evidence that would have been extremely traumatic.
"Today's sentence does not mark the end of our investigations and we will work tirelessly to identify any other victims or witnesses and seek the justice they deserve."
Baby Steps
8th August 2018, 16:49
MARGARET HODGE - part 2
https://i.imgur.com/tb0UBI1.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/S6qeUcm.jpg
From the following blogger (https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/tag/elwood-street/), basic info. Also see this (https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/how-margaret-hodges-policies-helped-paedophiles-infiltrate-islington-childrens-homes/). The Pedo's hid within the Gay movement, and gained undue protection. Various politicians complicit.
Margaret Hodge was leader of Islington Council from 1982 to 1992, when it was reported in the Evening Standard that every one of its children’s homes had been infiltrated by paedophiles. She immediately left Islington Council for a highly paid City job, but not before she had dismissed the reports as “sensationalist gutter journalism”.
She recently tried to explain her total failure to protect children in care from paedophile rings, prostitution, and trafficking by saying “All that happened when we didn’t really understand child abuse in the way that we understand it now. This was the early 90s … It was only beginning to emerge that paedophiles were working with children, in children’s homes and elsewhere”. (Guardian 27/04/13)
This is untrue. There were several major children’s homes paedophile scandals in the local and national news long before 1990 including Tyneside (1976), Kincora (1980), Leeways (1985), not to mention numerous cases involving paedophiles working as priests, teachers, scoutmasters, and other professions that have access to children.
And there were serious warning signs right on Margaret Hodge’s doorstep during her time as council leader, including a well publicised case of a 13 year old boy who was abducted from an Islington Council children’s home by a residential social worker.
The Citizen's Electoral Council of Australia (http://www.cecaust.com.au/eu/) provided the following. They appear to be a branch of Larouche/Schiller Institute:
Dame Hodge and her “Islington Set”
After interminable stalling, the Iraq Inquiry chaired by Sir John Chilcot, into the causes of the 2003 Iraq war, will at long last release its findings on 6 July. If recent media leaks are accurate, the inquiry will roast Blair himself for his notorious role in lying about Saddam Hussein’s non-existent Weapons of Mass Destruction in order to create a pretext for a war which he and US President George W. Bush intended in any case. Thus the Blairites, including Hodge—who voted both for the war and against any inquiry into the launching of that war—will be weakened politically, creating more breathing room for Corbyn and his policies, and thus their desperation to overthrow Corbyn while they still think they can.
That Dame Margaret should lead the present charge against Corbyn is lawful, because she and her husband Sir Henry Hodge did more than anyone else to create Tony Blair and “New Labour”.
The story begins in the late 1970s and early 1980s in the north London suburb of Islington, with the coalescence of the “Islington Set” around the blue-blooded Margaret Oppenheimer Hodge, of the ultra-wealthy Oppenheimer family and an heir to the family company Stemcor, which as of 2011 had an annual turnover of £6 billion (but which as of the following year paid only 0.01 per cent tax on its £2.1 billion of business generated in the UK), and husband Sir Henry, who was to sit as a High Court judge for England and Wales; their intimate political allies, the blue-blood Harriet Harman and her husband Jack Dromey; and a young couple whom the Hodges convinced to move in next door and whom they adopted as their protégés, Tony and Cherie Blair. The early strategy sessions of what was to become “New Labour” were conducted in the Hodges’ own home, and the careers of its dramatis personae have been a vital factor in British politics from then until today.
Hodge was chairman of the Islington Council in 1982-92. By 2015, in the words of Hodge, Harriet Harman had been her “closest friend” in Parliament for decades, as well as the longest continually serving female MP in the House of Commons, who had helped her husband become Treasurer of the Labour Party in 2004[1]. Following Labour’s loss to the Conservatives in the May 2015 national elections, Labour leader Ed Miliband stepped down, Harman took over as acting leader of the Labour Party and immediately announced that Labour would not oppose the brutal cuts in welfare, then being demanded by Chancellor George Osborne, “to show voters it had learned the lessons of May’s crushing election defeat.”[2] More revealingly, as a 7 June 2015 article in the Independent titled “Harriet Harman interview: Even Labour supporters were glad we didn’t win the election, says interim leader” reported, Harman claimed that Labour under Ed Miliband had lost because of its lack of “economic credibility”. Whatever his shortcomings, Miliband had strayed from the Blairite policies of rabid austerity, going so far, in the debates over the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill 2013, as to direct Labour to vote for a Glass-Steagall amendment, to break up the City of London’s megabanks—precisely those who had sponsored Blair’s career, and who have rewarded him with a post on the International Advisory Committee of JPMorgan Chase.
And when new members flooded into the Labour Party in excitement over Corbyn’s candidacy, Harman demanded that the party “weed out” many of the new members so as to maintain the dominance of the Blairites, “However her attempt to persuade the party to take action by weeding out these voters was blocked by Mr Corbyn’s union supporters, who feared it could damage his leadership chances”, reported a 17 August 2015Telegraph article titled, “Pro-Jeremy Corbyn unions block Harriet Harman’s bid to weed out anti-Labour ‘infiltrators’”. Meanwhile, her ally Margaret Hodge also did her best to stop the flood of new Labour members excited by Corbyn’s policies. Reported the Independent on 24 May 2015, “The head of Britain’s largest trade union should ‘shut up’ and stop interfering in Labour’s leadership election, one of the party’s most-senior MPs says today. Margaret Hodge, the outgoing chairman of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), told The Independent she was ‘fed up’ with ‘union barons’ like Len McCluskey trying to influence the result of the election. Her remarks came as it was revealed that Mr McCluskey’s union, Unite, is signing up as many as 1,000 members a day to join Labour and get a vote in the leadership contest.”
Protecting paedophiles?
Furthermore, Hodge has been excoriated for her role in covering up an extensive child abuse ring operating out of Islington council’s children’s homes on her watch as leader of the council, as reported, for instance, in a 6 April 2014 article in The Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10746412/Jimmy-Savile-sex-abuse-Islington-is-still-covering-up.html) by investigative journalist Eileen Fairweather, “Jimmy Savile sex abuse: ‘Islington is still covering up’.” The Times of 14 February 1986 had reported that the anti-child abuse MP Geoffrey Dickens “called on the Home Secretary to prepare a full report on allegations of the existence of child brothels in Islington, North London. Mr Geoffrey Dickens, MP for Littleborough and Saddleworth, said he had given Scotland Yard information” on the subject. In 1992 Fairweather spent three months working for the Evening Standard investigating the extensive paedophilia networks in Islington, “secretly interviewing terrified whistleblowing staff, parents and children before the newspaper published a damning investigation”, one which was “promptly attacked by Margaret Hodge as a ‘sensationalist piece of gutter journalism’.” More will soon be reported on the issue of Hodge, Harman, and paedophilia in Islington in the early days of the “Islington Set”, which will shed much light on the sordid soul of “New Labour”.
Baby Steps
13th August 2018, 12:11
JUDGE ORDERS PRINCE ANDREW SEX ALLEGATIONS STRUCK FROM COURT RECORD (https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/07/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-florida#referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s)
Virginia Roberts (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3245036/Virginia-Roberts-claimed-sex-Prince-Andrew-sues-British-socialite-Ghislaine-Maxwell-denying-claims-recruited-sex-slave.html)
Allegations that a 17-year-old was forced to have sex with Britain’s Prince Andrew, which prompted a crisis at Buckingham Palace earlier this year, have been removed from a federal court case by a judge in the US.
Describing Roberts’s allegations as “duplicative” of the existing lawsuit, the judge said the lawsuit already sought to overturn Epstein’s plea agreement on behalf of all “other similarly-situated victims”.
Marra noted in his order that US law empowers judges to “strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.”
Allegations that Roberts was also made to have sex with Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor and another friend of Epstein, were also struck from the case by Marra. The judge said a legal attempt by Dershowitz to intervene in the case was now unnecessary.
Baby Steps
13th August 2018, 12:28
Paedophiles in Parliament (https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2018/08/08/paedophiles-in-parliament/)
Posted on 2018, August, 8 by cathy fox blog on Child Abuse
Great summary of the situation in the UK with regard to powerful Government paedophiles in Westminster, the action against them and the child abuse investigation IICSA, now in its fourth year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnZiDxkwgrU
So, we heard that recently MPs voted to make their expense claims (and any associated misconduct) private- outside the public domain. Now we are hearing that this new level of 'privacy' extends to other misconduct including on going investigations, such as the Keith Vaz (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5998459/male-escorts-being-followed/) affair.
MP’s also voted last month to keep themselves anonymous if investigated by Parliament for crimes including abuse. All the MPs who voted for anonymity over abuse investigations [4]. For instance this meant that the investigations into Keith Vaz were immediately taken down from the Parliamentary Commissioners website and we would not have known about them if this was in force.
Links
[1] 2018 Aug 1 Sonia Poulton Paedophiles in Parliament https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4993&v=PnZiDxkwgrU
[2] Patreon Sonia Poulton https://www.patreon.com/soniapoulton
[3] Sonia Poulton webpage http://www.soniapoulton.co.uk
[4] 2018 Jul Left Foot Forward All the MPs who voted for anonymity over abuse investigations https://leftfootforward.org/2018/07/all-the-mps-who-voted-for-anonymity-over-abuse-investigations/ archive https://archive.is/B3e2A
[A] Sanctuary for the Abused http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/for-survivors-coping-with-triggers-if.html
[B] NAPAC http://www.napac.org.uk/
[C] One in Four http://www.oneinfour.org.uk/
[D] Havoca http://www.havoca.org/HAVOCA_home.htm
[E] SurvivorsJustice Triggers post http://survivorsjustice.com/2014/02/26/triggers-what-are-they-and-how-do-we-work-through-them/
[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog http://survivorsjustice.com/
[G] Jim Hopper Mindfulness http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/
[H] Jim Hopper Meditation http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/#cultivate
[J] 2016 Jan 5 Hwaairfan blog An Indigenous Australian Approach to Healing Trauma https://hwaairfan.wordpress.com/2016/01/05/an-indigenous-australian-approach-to-healing-trauma/
[K] Survivors UK website for victims and survivors of male rape or the sexual abuse of men https://www.survivorsuk.org/ and twitter https://twitter.com/SurvivorsUK
[L] Voicing CSA website – http://voicingcsa.uk/ helps arrange survivors meetings in your area. Voicing CSA supports the IICSA and VSCP and works to help adult survivors of child sexual abuse find their voice
[M] A Prescription for me blog Various emotional support links https://aprescriptionforme.wordpress.com/help/#emotionalsupport
[N] Fresh Start Foundation Scottish not for profit group, helping child sexual abuse victims & survivors to achieve Truth & Justice and to support their recovery. http://www.freshstartfoundation.co.uk/ Twitter @SurvivorsSoS Facebook https://www.facebook.com/survivorssupportline/
Pam
13th August 2018, 13:10
I found this alarming and difficult to watch someone try to justify and "understand" this kind of behaviour.
XcZRb_2uedU
I definitely think that there is a push to mainstream pedophilia, it is the final taboo. How realistic is it to believe that those that are attracted to children will not act on it. That is the initial introduction of pedophilia being acceptable. Drug addicts in recovery know that relapse often occurs in the process in the recovery. Are we to believe that someone with a strong drive of pedophilia is going to absolutely abstain? The odds are not in their favor.
Baby Steps
20th August 2018, 00:26
BRITISH FIGHT
Who are they? They use 'Anonymous' style imagery in their videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQixcS61W0Q
The facebook group is 'Aslan's Army'
There are some heavy hitters on there, and it is looking like they will be a nexus for British leaks from within the establishment. I have been told that the scale of the abuse and the figures involved is known by many within the Police, IPCC, and Judiciary. Detailed investigations have taken place and the decision has been made to suppress the information until the big wigs/perps are dead.
This is a classic delay/suppression and many are unhappy with this. Hence the leaking.
British fight/Aslan's Army appear to be right wing/Q & Trump loving 'patriots' with a strong strand of Tommy/Islamophobia together with Zionism.
What matters is that they have info, that they are sharing, and they are researching constantly. Their aim is to expose the corruption, and all power to them with that
The following lists are of people who have had convictions, so these are not 'allegations':
COMPILATION 1 - LABOUR (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612384372488095/)
COMPILATION 2 - TORIES (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612386535821212/)
COMPILATION 3 - The Rest (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/613338095726056/)
Parliamentary Paedo Rogue's Gallery (https://www.facebook.com/groups/578193219240544/permalink/612017929191406/)
They have started a political party - see below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZugkAh2Quek
British Fight have now dropped 15 names, with some q-like cryptic references. This has got people digging, but essentially it means that incriminating material is in their posession.
http://astheworldturns.co.uk
norman
29th August 2018, 12:47
Sue Black Catches Paedophiles by Looking at the Marks on Their Hands
[ then, continues with a hard sales pitch for technological trackabilty ]
Qjqa8oTikP8
https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/ACSszfEFfb4PxTaeQkzoqZtCzLgz47ANuKwWQODt_Q=s48-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no (https://www.youtube.com/user/WiredVideoUK)WIRED UK (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWrXlzhIENTJrAuKVuPgdEA)
Published on 20 Feb 2018
I could easily have chosen a thread about the technological control grid to post this video.
I have very mixed feelings about this presentation and why she was even invited to give it at the event.
muxfolder
2nd September 2018, 16:22
Sir Edward Heath WAS a paedophile, says police chief: Astonishing claim is made that the former PM is guilty of vile crimes 'covered up by the Establishment.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4238188/amp/Sir-Edward-Heath-paedophile-says-police-chief.html
Star Tsar
12th September 2018, 07:08
David Icke
Melanie Shaw, Saville & British Establishment Peadophilia
Published 10th September 2018
Mr Icke with a sitrep from the UK
V5AuLzmyS_Q
Baby Steps
12th September 2018, 08:28
David Icke
Melanie Shaw, Saville & British Establishment Peadophilia
Published 10th September 2018
Mr Icke with a sitrep from the UK
V5AuLzmyS_Q
Yes, according to Cathy Fox, Shaw is one of the whistle blowers for whom all legal process or pretence of justice has been dropped!
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2017/02/25/england-north-korea-jails-whistleblowers-no-trial-no-charge/
This demonstrates the point some may miss- that in the UK 'THE CROWN' is the ultimate law. Other laws , which pretend that the crown is not all powerful, are adhered to as much as possible to maintain the illusion.
https://i.imgur.com/KRnvsVH.jpg
Baby Steps
12th September 2018, 10:37
Chichester child abuse: How did one small Church of England diocese produce so many paedophile reverends? (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/chichester-paedophile-child-abuse-reverends-church-of-england-diocese-sex-offenders-a8270601.html)
Evidence at the inquiry concluded that the abuse was 'normalised' because it was practised by so many. Worse still, one member of the clergy believed that God had forgiven him and therefore 'his slate was wiped clean'
• Andreas Whittam Smith
• Sunday 25 March 2018
https://i.imgur.com/rHhx6YL.jpg
Top, from left: Michael Walsh, Christopher Howarth, Gordon Rideout and Michael Mytton. Bottom, from left: Jonathan Graves, Vickery House, Terence Banks and Peter Ball ( PA )
For a long time, I have wanted to understand why one small area of the Church of England has had a large number of the clergy sent to gaol for sexually abusing young people and children. The place is Sussex, particularly East Sussex, part of the diocese of Chichester.
I have not been alone in wanting this question answered. For the Government has set up an Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales and this body has turned its attention to the diocese of Chichester. The hearings have been going on for some weeks now. I shall make extensive use of what the inquiry has been told.
Let me start with something truly shocking. Here is the list of the main perpetrators:
Peter Ball was the Bishop of Lewes between 1977 and 1992 (later Bishop of Gloucester). In September 2015, Bishop Ball pleaded guilty to counts of misconduct in public office concerning sexual activity with young adults and two counts of indecent assaults against adults. He was sentenced to 32 months’ imprisonment.
The Reverend Vickery House was a vicar within East Sussex and a close associate of Peter Ball. He was convicted of five counts of indecent assault and was sentenced to six-and-a-half years’ imprisonment in October 2015.
Reverend Noel Moore was convicted of child sexual abuse in 1951 and jailed until 1955.
The Reverend Roy Cotton was convicted in 1954 of gross indecency while a child was present as he exposed himself in the organ loft.
Reverend Pritchard pleaded guilty in 2008 to seven counts of sexual assault against two boys and was jailed for five years.
Reverend Robert Coles pleaded guilty to counts of indecent assault and two of attempted buggery and was sentenced in February 2013 to eight years’ imprisonment.
Reverend Jonathan Graves was convicted in 2017 of 12 offences, including indecent assault and cruelty to a child, and was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.
Reverend Gordon Rideout was convicted of 34 counts of indecent assault and two counts of attempted rape against a total of 16 victims from May 2013. He was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. He also pleaded guilty in December 2016 to a further count of indecent assault against someone under the age of 16 and was sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment.
Reverend Keith Denford was convicted of three counts of indecent assault in April 2013 and sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment.
Reverend Christopher Howarth was convicted of 26 counts of sexual activity with a child and causing a child to engage in sexual activity and received 16 years’ imprisonment in total.
Peter Pannett was a deacon in the Brighton area. He pleaded guilty to two counts of making indecent images of children, one count of attempting incitement of a child to engage in sexual activity, and two counts of inciting a child under 16 to engage in sexual activity. He also pleaded guilty to two counts of causing a child to watch a sexual act. He was sentenced to 32 months of imprisonment.
So, why? John Hind, who was Bishop of Chichester 2001 to 2012, provided the answer when he told the inquiry that “abuse is not simply the act of some individual perpetrators, but actually it can involve collusion between different people, and that a climate can develop in certain areas in which people’s normal inhibitions against bad behaviour can get reduced. What is it that lowers those inhibitions? Well, one of them is clearly when you are in an environment in which a number of other people are abusing as well, and there can be a tendency to normalise what’s happening.” Another bishop in the diocese, Wallace Benn, said there was clearly a paedophile ring.
It can be small things as well as large that have a normalising effect. Janet Hind, the bishop’s wife, described how one of the complaints made by the victims and survivors of one of the abusers was that during his trial a member of the clergy came and sat in court every day to provide support to the accused. Also, when a new case of abuse came to light, senior clergy members would give more weight to their pastoral concerns for the “perpetrator” than for the victim or try to manage the whole thing pastorally instead of following the correct safeguarding procedure, according to testimony by Shirley Hosgood, a former diocesan safeguarding adviser.
Another normalising procedure was, paradoxically, displaying the Christian virtue of forgiveness, forgetting that it’s not for the perpetrator’s friends and colleagues to forgive but the perpetrator’s victims, if at all. Thus, despite Roy Cotton’s conviction, an earlier bishop of Chichester, Eric Kemp told a fellow bishop: “In my opinion, it is all right. He’s been badly handled by the police. You can give him permission to take church services again.”
To take another example – the Reverend Pritchard was granted permission to conduct services in February 2007 upon his retirement, despite having been rearrested at that time for child sexual offending. More significantly, forgiveness can be seen as “wiping the slate clean”. In his testimony to the inquiry, Archdeacon Philip Jones gave an interesting exposition.
He said that Rideout, who was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment, absolutely resisted any suggestion that he was guilty and “I believe he took the view that he had been forgiven by God, his slate was therefore wiped clean. More than that, in terms of his mental approach to it, indeed his psychological approach from a very conservative viewpoint, was that it would be almost as though the events for which he was under investigation and then convicted for hadn’t happened. So, the mental approach is that forgiveness in those circumstances means (the sin has) gone.” Mr Jones felt that was a fairly prevalent view.
However, there was also one large development that had an immense normalising impact. This was the presence of Peter Ball as Bishop of Lewes in East Sussex. A review carried out by Dame Moira Gibb gives his history and I quote from it.
In 1960 Peter Ball and his brother founded a monastic religious community. In 1968 an old barn was purchased in Somerset and renovated, with five members of the community moving to live there. Bishop Ball has said, in the course of a psychological assessment conducted in 2009, that it was here, believing that the Church had “gone soft”, that he began inflicting hardships on himself. These practices included sitting on a cold stone floor, praying naked in a cold chapel, fasting and self-flagellation. He also reported hitting other members of the community and being hit by them. He said that it was here that “things began to go wrong”.
Bishop Ball carried on in the same vein. When he first became a bishop, he announced that he would “continue to live as a religious with some of his brethren” – an unusual way of life for a bishop. In 1980, Ball launched an appeal to young people in East Sussex to join new residential communities which would give them a time-limited experience of monastic discipline, spiritual development and practical Christian service.
This initiative is variously referred to as the “Year for Christ” scheme, or the “Give a Year to God” scheme, and participants were often referred to as “schemers”. Separate male and female communities were envisaged, the former based at Ball’s own residence. From this time onwards, Ball regularly had a number of boys and young men living with him. Significantly, he usually employed no other staff to assist with housekeeping or domestic duties. No wonder; in effect he was trying to create “abuse” communities.
Bishop Ball also seems to have used his powers of appointment to find posts for a group of individuals within the East Sussex area, the majority of whom have now been accused of child sexual offending. Using Bishop Hind’s terms, this was “normalising” on a grand scale.
Baby Steps
12th September 2018, 11:33
GROUCHO CLUB - Part 1 - with thanks to Cathy Fox (https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2014/07/29/groucho-club-and-child-sexual-abuse/)
Groucho Club and Child Sexual Abuse
Posted on 2014, July, 29by cathy fox blog on Child Abuse
https://i.imgur.com/f4BSOVC.jpg
The Groucho Club is a private members club, set up in 1985 whose members are mainly drawn from publishing, media, entertainment and arts industries. [7]
In 2010 the Groucho Clubs web forum was found to have hundreds of web pages and links dedicated to gross and indecent material of young children [6]. This was reported to Metropolitan Police and CEOP but nothing appeared to be done. [6] Googles cache pages of the evidence also kept being removed.
Links have been made between Charles Napier of the Paedophile Information Exchange and the Groucho Club; Jeremy Hunt Health Secretary and sugar daddy JHJ Lewis of Groucho Club; church premises nearby being used by men associated with the Groucho club to make child porn films ; and surveillance cameras being used in the club for improper purposes [2].
There is the suggestion that various members used to snort cocaine and that there were extra surveillance cameras, initially vehemently denied by the Groucho Club, but proved to be present after a failed libel case by the Groucho Club [10]. If this was the case, the cctv could also be used to collect evidence other indiscretions. This evidence, in the wrong hands, could be used for blackmail purposes.
The Groucho club was thought to be the organising centre of celebrities who disapproved of the activities of the now defunct News of the World – a Rupert Murdoch newspaper. It has also been suggested in the comments section [12][10] that “I read this as Hunt has something, acquired from the Groucho, on Cameron, hence the promotion…”.
The Groucho Club was recently the object of a static protest from Child Protection campaigners who were asking the Groucho Club to come clean on the Child Abuse allegations.
The Groucho Club private members forum had 42,000 members, 900,000 posts and was operating for almost a year with children on sale for sex. The forum also had thousands of posts, photographs and videos of young children. However, the child abuse network operating on the Groucho Clubs forum was covered up. [8]
The Police failed to investigate and despite it being reported over 20 times did nothing for months while the evidence was destroyed. After a number of Politicians were informed by the Investigative Journalist Tyrone D Murphy about the failure of the Police, a report was then issued to any politicians who queried the Polices failure to act. A report was issued by the Police absolving the Groucho Club and the Police from any wrongdoing. This report was the subject of an IPCC investigation which upheld that the report was inaccurate and that no action would be take against the officer concerned because he was ill and would be retiring soon. [8]
“The Reason for this static protest is that many Anti Child Abuse organizations, charities, groups and parents are appalled that the systemic abuse of children over many years can simply be covered up allowing paedophiles and networks to move on without prosecution”. [8]
Calls have been made for Matt Hobbs, MD of the Groucho Club and John Henry James Lewis OBE, Chairman of the Groucho Club to come clean about the Child Pornography on the Groucho Club members forum or the evidence is to be released into the public domain soon [9]. An update will be issued to this post when it is.
2014 July Tyrone interview with Luke Rudowski
Who gave the order to cover up child pornography on the Groucho Club forum?
Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers. National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C] and Havoca [D]. Useful post on triggers [E] from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog.
Links, Hyperlinks, References and Bibliography
[1] ufmag http://www.ufmag.biz/Issues%20web%20pages/UFM%20web%20Issue%206/UFM%20Issue%206/UFM%20Issue%206_47.html
[2] Before its News http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2013/06/the-paedofile-abuse-is-rarely-black-and-white-but-it-is-a-global-business-2526700.html
[3] Come Clean on Child Abuse https://www.facebook.com/groups/520500264716410/
[5]Freedom Talk Radio PR log http://www.prlog.org/12352057-groucho-club-come-clean-on-child-abuse.html
[6] Sottnet article http://www.sott.net/article/242698-Groucho-Clubs-website-forum-hit-by-child-pornography-scandal
[7] Wikipedia Groucho club entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groucho_club
[8] PR log http://www.prlog.org/12352057-groucho-club-come-clean-on-child-abuse.html
[9] Freedom Talk Radio http://www.freedomtalkradio.net/groucho-club-london-come-clean-child-abuseporn
[10] The Slog Illegal Camerawork http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/illegal-camerawork-at-the-groucho-club/
[11] The Slog Bizarre Advert http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/breaking-new-groucho-paedophile-irony-shocker/
[12][10] Comments Section Tronnis September 6, 2012 at 4:10 pm Reply “I read this as Hunt has something, acquired from the Groucho, on Cameron, hence the promotion…”
[13]Breaking Down The News Copy of early article. http://breakingdownthnews.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/groucho-club-and-child-sexualabuse.html?q=groucho
[14] http://grouchogate.blogspot.ie/
[15] http://www.planetxtube.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/257-david-icke-elitist-masonic-club-membership-exposed-paedophilia-allegations-made-against-the-club-bbc-involved
[16] 2014 July Tyrone interview with Luke Rudowski http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x28yez3_elite-pedophilia-ring-on-private-network-exposed-the-groucho-club_news
[17] 2014 July 24 Freedom Talk Radio Groucho Club http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradionews/2014/07/24/live-from-soho-square-groucho-club-london-time-to-come-clean-on-child-abuse
[18] 2010 Mar 1 Independent Girls’ club that’s a refuge for boys who refuse to grow up http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/girls-club-thats-a-refuge-for-boys-who-refuse-to-grow-up-1913488.html
[19] Date ? Outside Left Glitter http://www.outsideleft.com/main.php?updateID=1105Glitter went to Groucho
[A] Sanctuary for the Abused http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/for-survivors-coping-with-triggers-if.html
[B] NAPAC http://www.napac.org.uk/
[C] One in Four http://www.oneinfour.org.uk/
[D] Havoca http://www.havoca.org/HAVOCA_home.htm
[E] SurvivorsJustice Triggers post http://survivorsjustice.com/2014/02/26/triggers-what-are-they-and-how-do-we-work-through-them/
[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog http://survivorsjustice.com/
This is all written in good faith but if there is anything that needs to be corrected please email cathyfox@bigfoot.com.
the truth will out, the truth will shout, the truth will set you free cathy fox
Baby Steps
12th September 2018, 11:40
GROUCHO CLUB (https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/illegal-camerawork-at-the-groucho-club/) - part 2
Involved:
Jeremy Hunt (https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/jeremy-hunt-sugar-daddy-under-siege-as-groucho-allegations-fly/)
Sadiq Khan
Bernie Katz (https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/prince-soho-bernie-katz-dead-celebrities-tributes_uk_59a934f5e4b0b5e530fdc224?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_us=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_cs=v_h1boBVEyA6tXJe5Uma_g)
The Murdochs
Illegal camerawork at The Groucho Club (https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/illegal-camerawork-at-the-groucho-club/):
Date: September 6, 2012
Author: John Ward
The story so far: we know that the Groucho Club run by JHJ Lewis indulged in unregulated surveillance. We know that a website using the same domain and name as The Groucho was an active paedophile linking forum for at least a year. We know that Mr Lewis has donated a probable six-figure sum over time to the new Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt. We know that Lewis gave Hunt £4000 to visit New York, where he hob-knobbed with the Murdoch media elite. We know that ten days later, James Murdoch met David Cameron and confirmed that the Murdoch-owned Sun newspaper would support the Conservative Party in the forthcoming election. And we know that Lewis was in charge of a major Tory paper on UK Tourism, one in which the Prime Minister took a keen personal interest. Today, in Episode Three of the Hunt-Groucho Saga, The Slog discusses what the chances are of these being significant, or simply coincidental, connections.
On 21st September 2009, a man described as having a London accent was disturbed attaching an electronic phone tap onto the telephone line at the filmmaker Tyrone Murphy’s Newport home. The police in Newport attended the scene after Murphy (a serial investigator of all things Groucho) disturbed the culprit and chased him off. Newport Plod seized electronic bugging equipment and tools left behind by the perpetrator as he fled. They also analysed CCTV footage of the incident, but nothing came of it.
Mr Murphy’s curiosity had been aroused over time by the seemingly generous appointment of surveillance cameras in The Groucho Club. As a result, he wrote about it in a book due for publication in 2009. On hearing of the book’s content, the Groucho Club took out an injunction against its publication, and sued Tyrone Murphy for libel. But at the very last minute, Lewis’s Club managers issued a discontinuance notice on the 3rd November 2009. That is, they accepted that their case against the Irish investigator had collapsed.
The Groucho’s libel case was blown out of the water by a statement from one of the its own managers (with copious exhibits that included internal e mails and CCTV footage from the club). In a nutshell, it supported Murphy’s contention that further cameras had been secretly installed at the Groucho, and these lacked any proper registration with the authorities as required under the Data Protection Act.
But one mystery remains as unsolved as the motivation behind Lewis’s steadfast support for his protege Jeremy Hunt: why did the Groucho Club need all these additional cameras following the antics of its members 24/7?
https://i.imgur.com/CaoxJT0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/WeCfWvL.jpg
Baby Steps
16th November 2018, 23:00
The interesting past of Theresa May, by MW:
Theresa May's Father, Reverend Hubert Brasier, was born on 20th August 1917 at 61 Clonmore Street, Wandsworth, London. Like many people a century ago, his was a home birth. Hubert’s father, Tom Brasier, was a military man. He had served as a sergeant in the King's Royal Rifles, but was a clerk by the time Hubert was born. Hubert's mother's maiden name was Amy Margaret Patterson and they had married 8 years prior in Hampshire. Amy and Tom’s first son, James David Brasier, had died within a year of his birth in 1911 in Uttaranchal, India, where Tom Brasier had been deployed whilst in service. Two years later, in 1919, Hubert was joined by his younger sister and only other sibling Jean Robina Brasier.
By 1938, Hubert Brasier was 21 years old and attending Leeds University. On the 27th April 1939, preempting World War 2, Neville Chamberlain’s cabinet introduced limited conscription. Single men between the ages of 20 to 22 were now eligible to be called up for compulsory military service. A month later the ‘Military Training Act’ was passed in the UK Houses of Parliament. On the 3rd of September 1939 WW2 began and the ‘Military Training Act’ became the ‘National Service (Armed Forces) Act’ which increased liability of call up to men aged 18 to 40.
In the year 1940 Hubert Brasier, then 23, had a decision to make. As a man of his age in the early years of WW2 he was probably heading to fight the Nazi Wehrmacht, or heading to defend British colonial outposts. Hubert Brasier felt his only path was that of the Anglican-Catholic Church, and he joined the priests at the Community of the Resurrection Seminary School in Mirfield, West Yorkshire. In years to come the Community of the Resurrection would become known for the systematic sexual abuse of children at the seminary by the Italian Verona brothers, who were rampant sex offenders in the 1960’s and 1970’s. However the seminary in Mirfield in the early 1940’s was just about to start welcoming its first refugee children. In December 1941 mass bombing of Sheffield and other northern industrial towns meant many children were evacuated to the countryside. The residents of Mirfield were some of the first to support the war effort and receive evacuee.
The Community of the Resurrection had only been founded at the later part of the 1800’s. The people of Mirfield took some time getting used to having the single young men of the seminary walking around the village. One Mirfield resident recalled them being referred to as ‘The Petticoat Men of t’Resurrection’. In the early 1900’s the residents of Mirfield grew suspicious of the men of god and this climaxed to a protest outside the Black Bull in Mirfield proper. Father Frere, a talented musician who was popular with the locals, stood on a chair and used his preaching talents to good effect. The community of Mirfield and the Community of the Resurrection were a tight knit unit by the 1940’s. When the northern industrial hub of England began to be targeted by the Luftwaffe nightly, many children from all over England were evacuated to communities such as Mirfield. Hubert Brasier would only stay in Mirfield for the beginning of his training.
In 1942 he was designated to a new church, in London, and after a year of hands on priestly experience he would be ordained. Hubert's first placement was at The Church of St Andrew on Sandhurst Road in Catford, Southwark. The bombings were numerous in Catford, and the community was very close, soon to be brought closer by tragedy. On the 20th January 1943 a bomb landed directly on the local Sandhurst Primary School, 38 Children were killed alongside 6 teachers. To be a man of God in this devastated community would have meant sharing a lot of suffering and loss. The parents of many of the lost children agreed for them to be buried in a mass grave at Hither Green Cemetary, and for a terraced memorial to be laid in their honour.
Theresa May's father was still a bachelor priest at this point in history. During the war life, the whole of London could be savage. The bombing brought death daily to Lewisham and the number of funerals were overwhelming for all of the local religious institutions. When war ceased Hubert continued to serve the Anglican-Catholic community of Catford until 1948 where he was relocated to a Reigate in Surrey and the very small, steeple-free church of St Luke, in the Southpark area. In contrast to The Church of St Andrew in Catford, St Luke’s was almost retirement. Obviously the stress and strain of the war experience had affected the still single Hubert, and the transfer made for good respite. In 1952 Hubert had reached the age of 35, and as in Mirfield at the turn of the century, celibacy provided more questions than it answered. Communities were already rife with gossip and speculation about the private lives of others. It can be presumed that the Anglican-Catholic churches history of child abuse is older than just the last 60 years, and it would usually be easier for a priest to be married.
The Serial Killer
The following year, in 1953, Hubert became the Chaplain All Saints at Eastbourne Hospital in Sussex. Over the next 6 years he would work alongside the famous serial killer Dr John Bodkin Adams. For those who are unaware of Dr John Bodkin Adams, he was believed to be the Harold Shipman of his age. He would usually prey upon his more elderly patients, convincing them to put him in their wills, of which over 130 complied. They were soon given an injection by Bodkin Adams, and would conveniently pass away of ‘natural causes’ soon after. On review more than 165 of the deaths that Dr Bodkin Adams oversaw were seen as suspicious. The suspicion was not a well kept secret amongst staff at Eastbourne Hospital, most of the nurses had voiced their concerns to their superiors. They were believed to have been ignored on purpose, as the newly founded NHS was considered to be under political threat and a scandal that could see a general practitioner sentenced to death was to be avoided at all cost. The problem was Dr Bodkin Adams just couldn’t stop himself. He was being protected by Lord Gwynne who was believed to be his secret gay lover, and was an extremely well connected politician.
Hubert Brasier would have given last rights to many of those killed by Adams, he may have even taken confession from Bodkin Adams himself, who when asked by the press if he was guilty of stealing from old women said ‘I have made my peace with God over that’. Eastbourne Hospital is where it is believed that Theresa May’s mother Zaidee Mary Barnes met Hubert Brasier for the first time. Hubert was 11 years her senior and Zaidee had already been diagnosed with MS, and was a regular visitor to Eastbourne Hospital. Whether or not in the 1950’s society it was considered appropriate for a celibate hospital chaplain to marry a patient, that is what happened in 1955. Zaidee and Hubert were married in Reading in front of Zaidee’s father Reginald James Barnes whose profession is recorded in the wedding certificate as a ‘Traveller’. On October 1st 1956 Theresa Brasier was born in Eastbourne hospital. The following year Dr John Bodkin Adams would be acquitted of murder in a trail that was an obvious cover up, however he was convicted on 8 counts of forging a prescription, 4 counts of making false statements on cremation forms, and 3 offences under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1951. He would be temporarily struck of the NHS, only to be reinstated in 1961 when the proverbial dust had settled.
As chaplain of Eastbourne Hospital Hubert was under the Chichester Diocese of the Church of England. During the 1960’s til the 1990’s this diocese has some of the worst examples of child sexual abuse committed by priests. The numbers and the scope of the phenomenon is truly astounding. Canon Gordon Rideout who was the Vicar of All Saints in Eastbourne was jailed for ten years for 36 separate offences on 16 children between 1962 and 1973. Peter Ball, former Bishop of Lewes was convicted of abuse in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Former priest Keith Wilke Denford of Burgess Hill and organist Michael Mytton were convicted of historic sexual abuse. Vickery House, a former Brighton priest was also convicted along with the former Vicar of Brede, Roy Cotton. Former Vicar of St Barnabas in Bexhill was charged and convicted of historic allegations amongst many others. But Father Hubert Brasier was about to be offered a fantastic opportunity that would take him from the Chichester Diocese.
In 1959, Theresa May's father, Hubert Brasier was installed as the 1st Vicar of Enstone with Heythrop, deep in the Diocese of Oxford. This cannot be understated, it was quite an achievement. Only 4 miles from Chipping Norton this was a sought after location and Hubert would have been the envy of many men of the Anglican-Catholic cloth. Hubert is approaching his mid forties and it may be time to permanently settle for the sake, and sanity of his family. He lives the quiet life in Enstone for 11 years with only records of baptisms, funerals, and weddings to note his existence. In 1970 Hubert is moved to be Vicar of Wheatley in Oxfordshire as Zaidee’s condition was worsening and he was no spring chicken anymore.
On October 12, 1981, Hubert was killed in a car accident on his way to a service at a local church in nearby Forest Hill. His Morris Marina edged out of a central reservation and in front of an oncoming Range Rover driven by a chartered surveyor named Desmond Hampton. Hubert Brasier died of head and spinal injuries sustained in the crash soon after, Zaidee would pass away months later. The Oxfordshire Coroner Nicholas Gardiner recorded a verdict of accidental death.
The Cover Ups
(https://talkradio.co.uk/news/child-abuse-inquiry-member-i-was-silenced-2015-ensure-theresa-may-could-become-prime-minister)
So there is the life of Hubert Brasier, it doesn’t seem like there’s is much to see. Yet just after Theresa May took over at No.10 her campaign team started to request the deletion of web addresses linked to Hubert Brasier. If you were to go to Wikipedia and type in Hubert Brasier there will be no results. I first realised that he had once had a Wiki entry when I found a version of it in French, and then one in Spanish. Any researcher has the wonderfully named ‘Wayback Machine’ to help them nowadays. You can go to the archive and find pages that have been deleted, only if you can work out the original web address. In this case you can copy and paste the Wikipedia page address and add Hubert_Brasier to the end. You will see Hubert’s Wiki page in all its former glory from a snapshot archived on 17th July 2016. For some reason the people around May, or May herself, do not want you looking into the history of Hubert Brasier. After researching Hubert’s life I came across many pages that had been removed, links to nowhere, and a few conspiracy theories too. On investigation of Hubert’s Wiki entry there is nothing damning present. It’s not a large entry, it covers only the basics, so why would you want it removed? The only important information it seems to contain is Hubert’s placements within the Church of England, and that he’s Theresa May’s father.
On 8th July 2014, Theresa May as Home Secretary, oversaw the appointment of Baroness Butler-Sloss to the inquiry set up to investigate child sexual abuse by prominent politicians and clergy in the previous decades. Within 6 days of the announcement of Baroness Butler-Sloss as chair, she was forced to stand down for obvious conflicts of interest. Theresa May had selected somebody whose brother was Attorney General during some of the periods being investigated. Later the same year May chose the then Lord Mayor of London, Fiona Woolf, to chair the inquiry. Fiona Woolf had to stand down when it became apparent that she had lived near Leon Brittan, who had also been accused of alleged sexual abuse. She recalled sending him and his wife a dinner invite at around the time of the accusations. It was almost as if Theresa May was sabotaging the inquiry with no regard for the victims who still required answers. On 4th February 2015, May announced that Dame Lowell Goddard, a New Zealand High Court judge, would be taking over as chair. But a month after Theresa May became Prime Minister, in August 2016, the new Home Secretary Amber Rudd announced the resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard. Soon after her resignation it was announced that one of the existing panel members, Professor Alexis Jay, became the chair. But now the inquiry has faced serious and obvious questions about its credibility.
To get things so badly wrong must be almost impossible. Theresa May never seemed to meet any of her immigration targets as Home Secretary, and it is truly hard to name her recorded achievements whilst she has been in office. But the inquiry into child sexual abuse seems to be something Theresa May does not want to face. My thoughts are that the investigation will focus on Tory MP’s who frequented the infamous Elm Guest House, but also the Diocese of Chichester, once the ecumenical home of her Father Hubert Brasier. So what is it that you fear Mrs May? The truth about your colleagues, or is it something much closer to home? Maybe May is terrified of people connecting her with the name Brasier?
I have done my best to build an accurate jigsaw from all the pieces I could locate, but it may need a different set of eyes to see the real picture.
Baby Steps
24th November 2018, 09:43
Child abuse inquiry member: 'I was silenced in 2015 to ensure Theresa May could become Prime Minister'
By Amy Southall
Friday, August 11, 2017
A child abuse survivor who served on the panel of the Government's independent inquiry has told talk RADIO she was silenced to ensure Theresa May could become Prime Minister.
Sharon Evans, who also runs the charity Dot Com, told John Nicolson the child abuse inquiry was all about controlling information, and she fears the Grenfell Tower inquiry will proceed along the same lines.
Evans was a senior figure and a public face at the inception of the inquiry, which was set up in 2015 following the Jimmy Savile paedophilia scandal while May was still home secretary.
She told John Nicolson that she soon began to harbour concerns about how the inquiry was being run, and these concerns prompted her to suggest to her fellow panellists that they write to Theresa May.
She continued: "I was taken to one side and it was made clear to me, I was told that Theresa May was going to be the Prime Minister, this inquiry was going to be part of this, and that if I didn't toe the line and do I was told, if I tried to get information out, I would be discredited by her advisors."
She went on to allege that this warning was issued by the inquiry's QC, Ben Emmerson, who served as a go-between between May and the inquiry team.
Evans also claimed that, when talking to the Home Affairs Select Committee, she was given a 23-page document of what she should say and told then-chair Keith Vaz "I fear that I may not be able to tell the truth because I have been told what I may and may not say."
Although Evans and her colleagues were promised the inquiry would be independent, she told John "there was no independence" and the confidentiality clause imposed on all panel members facilitated the "suppression" of the truth.
When asked who wanted to suppress the information, she said "my belief is that it was the Home Office."
Grenfell, she continued, looks like it will be "exactly the same... I want to try to stop them going down the same road, where they are controlled and information is suppressed. When there is an inquiry they can gather all the information and then they can choose what is released. That is what I think is extremely dangerous."
An IICSA spokesperson said: "We are not aware of any such conversation.
"As we noted yesterday, this Inquiry was established in March 2015. It is a statutory inquiry and our independence is underpinned by the Inquiries Act 2005. This is different from the previous non-statutory process."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTmBA5HfEMk
Baby Steps
24th November 2018, 11:41
I thought that the above interview with Sharon Evans was relevant, as it demonstrates that the public enquiry and select committee process we use is largely a sham designed to create the impression that issues are being investigated in a transparent way, when in reality the process is suppressed and the wheels of justice are stilled. Theresa May, when Home Secretary, showed mastery in waging a rear-guard defensive strategy against the emerging truth of elite child abuse. As leader the obfuscation continues, however the truth will triumph eventually.
TRANSCRIPT
…and we were appointed as panel members and promised that this inquiry, the child abuse inquiry, would be open.
I'm a journalist although I now run the charity and part of what I was asked was to be on the panel so that I could
be a public face and I could speak publicly about things that were happening, but what actually happened - and
the reason that I'm speaking out now- is that we were asked to sign contracts that were created by the Home Office and
obviously you need to sign the contract to be part of the plan. There’s a clause in the contract that says of
course you're not allowed to give any information out publicly and then they got us to sign a collective
responsibility agreement which said that basically a majority of the panel had to agree if we released information -
but in actual fact that was both of those things in conjunction were used to keep everybody quiet about the way the inquiry was being run.
It should have been about protecting evidence, protecting witnesses, and making sure that that legal cases were properly dealt with but that was not how it was used.
What threats did you receive, what sanctions were suggested if you spoke out?
Well it became very clear to me, and when we went round to meetings and we were being given very serious allegations about very public figures which we took back to the inquiry and nothing was being done about it months in- they couldn't actually tell us how the information was going to be used, and I was chairing the panel on one day and I suggested that we wrote to Theresa May who was the Home Secretary, to express our concerns.
At the end of the day I was taken to one side and it was made clear to me - this is what I was told - that two years ago that Theresa May was going to be the prime minister, and that this inquiry was going to be part of this, and that if I didn't tow the line and do as I was told - if I tried to get information out that I would be discredited by her .
But nobody knew Theresa May was going to be Prime Minister two years ago so who was it who told you that Theresa May would be Prime Minister ?
I was the key to the inquiry, it's Ben Emerson (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/sep/28/ben-emmerson-counsel-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry-sacked-concerns-over-leadership) who was her advisor - I mean he was the go-between, between the
Home Office, the Home Secretary and the panel.
I'm an abuse survivor myself as well as being a journalist and I thought that being on this panel was extremely important, that we would be uncovering great wrongs and making a difference in changing things. It was so obvious that everything was about the control and suppression of information and we were also promised that the inquiry was independent and you know when you have home office contracts and everything was run by the Home Office there was no independence. But in fact it was the Home Secretary who decided,
having said that survivors would be at the heart of this inquiry, that after eight or nine months decided that survivors wouldn't be at the heart of the inquiry.
Who was that you think who wanted to suppress information?
My belief is that it was the Home Office that we have. I mean I have got a document it's 23 pages of when I appeared in front of the Home Affairs Select Committee which should be where you openly and honestly answer the questions and challenges of MP - yeah because you can say what you like - privilege to tell the truth to parliamentary committee. I know when I started they provided me with a 23 page document that told me exactly what I may and may not say to the parliamentary committee and for me –
What were you not allowed to say to the parliamentary committee?
There were lots of things that said we had to answer this is a matter for the Home Office it was, I mean, they gave us key questions like you know whether we were going we were making statements publicly have we started taking evidence, what was the quality of the listening meetings, and to every single one of those questions they provided an answer which they said in the briefing that their advice was that we may use our own words and phrase but we must give these answers.
But I was so alarmed by this document because I'm a journalist, I know the importance of those committees but I actually went to the clerk of committee and said that I fear that I may not able to tell the truth because I have been told what I may and may not say.
That's interesting - what did the clerk of the committee say when you said that?
He was horrified and he went and got Keith Vaz who was the chair and he told me that I must tell the truth and that I must provide this document to the Home Affairs Select Committee. So that's what happened.
But Keith Vaz of course had to resign from the committee after very unfortunate circumstances and very concerning in his own private life .As you know your advice to the Grenfell panel members therefore is that this may not be a straightforward inquiry that reveals all the information in the way that they perhaps hope but I get the impression that there's a lot of suspicion about Grenfell, before it even starts.
Well I think from what I've been hearing that people are already being encouraged to come and give information informally and this is how we started on the child abuse inquiry but the thing is it seems to me it's exactly the same. I want to try to stop them going down the same road where they're controlled and information is suppressed because when there's an inquiry they can gather all the information and then they can choose what is released and that is what I think is extremely dangerous. In this case now there's another big story -today we know with the police paying ten thousand pounds to an informant - a paedophile informant - to provide information which has secured prosecutions.
As an abuse survivor yourself do you think that that's an acceptable way for the police to behave? Is it acceptable for the police to hand over money if at the end of the day it delivers convictions?
I can understand the position that the police have taken on this but personally as a survivor myself, and having spoken to many survivors and victims across the country, the idea of the police paying ten thousand pounds to a person who is a child abuser is absolutely abhorrent, and there must be other ways for them to get information, and I think it is also indicative of the way the police are run down because police can go undercover and can get information. But also when I was on the inquiry what on the first hand is that there is a real lack of support for victims coming forward so what we need is a greater wraparound support to encourage victims to come forward because that is really what worked with the Jimmy Savile case - it was the weight of the people coming forward to give information- that's what we should be looking for in these inquiries not paying paedophiles thousands of pounds .
Frenchy
24th November 2018, 11:52
Sometiimes I forget to write and save in Word, BEFORE II post ! Just lost all I wrote, just when Herve was here too ! ( Do tptb have SUCH sophisticated surveillance ? ) Needed to say, Sir Baby Steps, it is a pity this pst had 'Slid' out of sight. I hope all visitors and Avalonians know of Cathi, UKColumn.org, Field McConnell and all those who battle against horrendous odds to try and reach the Public's atention. Sorry to say this, but If I had enough money to print a Fact-Sheet on this topic, and deliver to every house in GB and Eire, maybe the apathy from this already 'dumbed-down' population wold clearly show itself...
And the funding feeding the very head of the monster, continues... ALL OUR TAXES go to this, we have ( Apart Karen Hudes Cathy Austin Fitts, etc... ) have NO concept of the amount of money involved... ( H#ll, in France, their then Finance minister was able to pass, 'under the table €404 MILLION to her pal Bernie Tapie - Oh, what a pity, just like Janner, caught temporary Alzhimer, so Tapie might have caught temporary Brain Cancer... Not sporting to make a dying man pay back, what ? )
https://thebasesproject.org/cathi-morgan-bio/
Edit to draw attention to one HUGE relevation, buried in Sharon Evan's disclosure - I don't think it is really off-topic to pint out that here's another clear evidence of Elections being a Farce, when they know TWO YEARS in advance, that Treason May, would be ( had been already ) selected. Relevant,'cos they've the dirt on her.
How deep is this cesspit ?
Baby Steps
24th November 2018, 12:19
Sometiimes I forget to write and save in Word, BEFORE II post ! Just lost all I wrote, just when Herve was here too ! ( Do tptb have SUCH sophisticated surveillance ? ) Needed to say, Sir Baby Steps, it is a pity this pst had 'Slid' out of sight. I hope all visitors and Avalonians know of Cathi, UKColumn.org, Field McConnell and all those who battle against horrendous odds to try and reach the Public's atention. Sorry to say this, but If I had enough money to print a Fact-Sheet on this topic, and deliver to every house in GB and Eire, maybe the apathy from this already 'dumbed-down' population wold clearly show itself...
And the funding feeding the very head of the monster, continues... ALL OUR TAXES go to this, we have ( Apart Karen Hudes Cathy Austin Fitts, etc... ) have NO concept of the amount of money involved... ( H#ll, in France, their then Finance minister was able to pass, 'under the table €404 MILLION to her pal Bernie Tapie - Oh, what a pity, just like Janner, caught temporary Alzhimer, so Tapie might have caught temporary Brain Cancer... Not sporting to make a dying man pay back, what ? )
https://thebasesproject.org/cathi-morgan-bio/
Awesome!!
I am no expert - your fact sheet would be very very beneficial!
Matthew
13th January 2019, 03:27
Peter Wells: I was unlucky enough to speak to a friend of one of his victims this evening. In this conversation Peter Wells was described as a master manipulator. Here's more about this case from the MSM:
http://resources.mynewsdesk.com/image/upload/c_crop,h_1211,w_1614,x_0,y_404/t_next_gen_span3_fill_4_3/twhguzxadq9uwptvz55g.jpg
‘Our secret’: prep school teacher accused of child sex abuse over two decades
* TRISTAN KIRK Courts Correspondent, Evening Standard
* Wednesday 14 November 2018 11:12
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/our-secret-prep-school-teacher-accused-of-child-sex-abuse-over-two-decades-a3989631.html
A former teacher at a £15,000-a-year prep school groped a pupil in a Second World War bunker during child sex abuse which stretched over two decades, a court heard.
Peter Wells, 72, is accused of abusing two pupils while teaching at Keble prep school in Winchmore Hill, north London, and indecently assaulting a third boy when he was a Scout master in the Seventies.
It is alleged that Wells, a science and games teacher, regularly stripped off in front of pupils as they showered after sports sessions.
“The allegations relate to sexual abuse of three boys when Mr Wells was in a position of trust,” prosecutor Richard Merz told Wood Green crown court.
One boy claimed he was abused dozens of times by Wells over the course of eight years, during school trips and after athletics sessions.
...
UPDATE
After speaking with people involved I learnt the figures in the report were under exaggerated; it says he was abused dozens of times, but was more like hundreds. The victim has found the trial hard, because he spent 40 years burying the trauma. Now he's right back deep in the vivid memories of what happened; he's in quite a state.
Peter Wells at the Metropolitan Police website:
http://news.met.police.uk/images/peter-wells-1497385
http://news.met.police.uk/news/former-teacher-who-sexually-abused-three-boys-jailed-for-15-years-339054
http://news.met.police.uk/news/former-scout-leader-convicted-of-historical-sex-offences-335340
Matthew
3rd March 2019, 09:10
Here's a bit more of Jon Wedger (a police whistle-blower on child abuse in UK)
A retired Police Detective who specialised in child abuse investigations talks about how he got into the field, and what it was like to investigate child abuse for Scotland Yard's Vice squad.
hyvpuwb08RA
Baby Steps
3rd March 2019, 14:08
Here's a bit more of Jon Wedger (a police whistle-blower on child abuse in UK)
A retired Police Detective who specialised in child abuse investigations talks about how he got into the field, and what it was like to investigate child abuse for Scotland Yard's Vice squad.
hyvpuwb08RA
Many thanks for this- brilliant. Wedger sets out the process of child exploitation and abuse in detail. Social services are up against these challenges daily. Children in care who are groomed, sneak out of the care homes, and end up in unsafe environments , plied with drugs and prostituted out by mafia types to rich punters.
Even ignoring the bad apples within the care home system, that has cleaned itself up after the scandals, the challenge is that the kids are enticed to sneak away, and end up in a hellish situation, They get entrapped by gangsters who tell them that they owe money. They work as drugs mules or carriers. Their lives and personalities are destroyed and if they speak out they are ignored or intimidated.
Wedger is an absolute hero for standing up on this.
The Tommy Robinson fight regarding the muslim grooming gangs ignores the fact that this has been going on for much longer and the muslim grooming gangs are only part of it.The British underbelly taught those gangs all they know.
I know people working in this area. They also are heroes. The vast majority of police, carers and social workers are sincerely working to save the kids.
What Wedger portrays so well is the fact the the British establishment are involved. These gangster types exploiting children are the lowest of the low. When people like Wedger start digging into this they find that the gangsters are supplying establishment figures with children, and that is when the police start pressuring their own people to STOP investigating.
Baby Steps
20th March 2019, 21:12
LINKS AT BOTTOM....
The blood-soaked body of a private detective who linked John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been found at a mansion in Surrey, England.
Mystery surrounds the death of Washington D.C. based Kevin Halligen, 56, who presented himself as a ‘cloak-and-dagger, James Bond-style spy’ who took on the most difficult cases. Surrey Police confirmed Saturday that a probe has been launched into his death.
FOUL PLAY SUSPECTED
Kevin Halligen took over the private investigation into the Madeleine McCann case in May 2008 and was responsible for linking John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of the 3-year-old girl in Portugal, sparking frenzied speculation that the brothers, both high-level Democratic Party operatives, were responsible for her murder.
The 56-year-old detective and his partner Henri Exton were responsible for the two e-fit sketches, {note - this link only mentions Exton, doesnt name Halligen} that were released in the search for the Madeline McCann abductor(s), and which bore more than a passing resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.
Kevin Halligen’s investigative work into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann revealed that one of the men pictured in the e-fit sketches was seen carrying a young child that resembled the 3-year-old child on a beach in Praia da Luz, Portugal, a popular beach holiday location where Halligen also proved the Podesta brothers were holidaying at the time.
HALLIGAN HAD ‘DIRT’ ON THE PODESTAS
Mainstream media attempted to convince everyone that it was a co-incidence. However the 56-year-old private detective knew more about the Podesta brothers and their secrets than many initially assumed. The British investigator was D.C. based, and worked for Oakley International, an intelligence operation that considered the Podesta Group to be its natural enemy.
Oakley International was based out of 2550 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. This address is also the office of Patton Boggs, Washington’s most politically-connected law firm and lobbyist organization. When Halligan first moved to D.C. in 2005, he hired Patton Boggs to help set up his new business.
Through his close connection with Patton Boggs, Kevin Halligen was more than familiar with The Podesta Group. They are closely connected. Tony Podesta has gone on record on multiple occasions praising Tommy Boggs of Patton Boggs: “He’s a brilliant guy who invented what a lot of us do.”
Nick Allard, Patton Boggs co-chairman also returns the praise for Tony Podesta: “Tony and his group are the right people at the right time in the right place…Tom Boggs invented the lawyer-lobbyist model and Tony perfected it. They are probably the two giants of the modern practice. There is no one else in the same zip code.“
So there is no question Halligen knew about the Podestas and their reputation. Why did he link them to Madeleine McCann’s disappearance in Portugal? What dirt did Halligan have on the two powerful Democratic operatives?
Why did Kevin Halligen, hired by the McCann’s to investigate their daughter’s disappearance, produce e-fits closely resembling (beyond reasonable doubt) his client’s (Patton Boggs) biggest rivals?
Who persuaded – and why – Gerry and Kate McCann to put their faith in a random Washington DC-based private detective, and pay him $500,000, after he reached out to them telling them he could find their daughter?
And why was Gerry McCann pictured laughing and joking his way around Washington D.C., in July 2007 (less than three months after his daughter Madeleine disappeared), lobbying statesmen on child trafficking, kissing Laura Bush’s dog, and generally enjoying the limelight?
Kevin Halligen’s blood-soaked death in Surrey, England this week stinks to high heaven. The man who linked the Podestas to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann appears to have paid the ultimate price for something he did during his 56 years on this earth. Many believe linking the powerful Podestas to the disappearance of the 3-year-old was the moment he signed his death warrant.
Daily Mail records his death, but talks up how Halligen was accused of defrauding the McCann's 'find our daughter' fund of $300 000
We're coming back into election season and sure as **** Maddie comes back up again with this new season on Netflix all while JP is in NZ before the shooting. Maddie is like a dog whistle to these guys. This all started at the same time Obama went to run for office and the efits of the podestas came out just before John took a job with Obama years later. Watch this space we will hear more on this story in the next 12 months 100% guarantee
EXCLUSIVE: Mystery surrounds the death of private detective Kevin Halligen, 56
His body was found at his home in Surrey and police have launched a probe
Halligen took over the private investigation into the McCann case in May 2008 but was later accused of conning the family fund out of £300,000
https://newspunch.com/detective-podestas-mccann-dead/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5265977/Maddie-McCann-detective-conman-Kevin-Halligen-dead.html
https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2018/01/maddie-detective-halligen-found-dead.html?m=1
http://https://i.ibb.co/R9FnQXb/image.jpg (https://imgbb.com/)
Baby Steps
20th March 2019, 23:53
http://https://i.ibb.co/6rJ9sns/image.jpg (https://ibb.co/6rJ9sns)
MI5 files reveal Thatcher supported key ally over child sex abuse claims
Ben Gelblum
March 12, 2019
MI5 files have revealed for the first time what many suspected. Margaret Thatcher was aware of alleged sexual offences by her Private Parliamentary Secretary Sir Peter Morrison yet chose to defend him.
Testimony as well as documents MI5 have handed to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) suggest a rallying behind the Conservative minister despite concerns laid out about Morrison’s “interest in small boys”.
Peter Morrison, Tory MP for Chester was a junior minister, then Conservative party deputy chairman before becoming Private Parliamentary Secretary to Margaret Thatcher in 1990.
He was one of Thatcher’s most faithful allies, persuading her to stand for the party leadership in 1975. Morrison was knighted in 1991 and died in 1995.
The IICSA is probing how the Conservative Party and secret services dealt with allegations of child sex abuse made against Sir Peter Morrison. He was never charged with the allegations levelled against him.
The MI5 files suggest then PM Thatcher knew of the allegations against him.
In a memo from 1986, revealed to the inquiry yesterday, Eliza Manningham-Buller, who later became director general of MI5, wrote that she met Morrison and regarding the allegations against him, she reported that “the prime minister was aware of it and was supporting Peter.”
The memo also mentions his conversation with another member of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet, Sir Norman Tebbit – a conversation Tebbit referred to shockingly on the BBC’s Marr show years later. When asked if there was a “big political cover up” at the time, the former Chairman of the Conservative Party replied: “you didn’t talk about those things.”
Lord Tebbit has been asked by the inquiry what he knew about Sir Peter Morrison, after reports emerged that an investigating police officer visited Norman Tebbit to warn him about allegations involving boys.
Lord Tebbit’s statement to the investigations said that he thought the police officer was referring to boys of “Sixth Form age.”
A statement read out by Lord Tebbit said that he was aware of “several decades of allegations of Westminster child abuse and cover ups.”
Last week we also reported how the inquiry heard an extract from former Tory MP Edwina Currie’s diary for July 24 1990 (published in 2002).
Junior Health Minister Currie wrote in her diary about Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet reshuffle:
continued:
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/mi5-files-reveal-thatcher-supported-key-ally-over-child-sex-abuse-claims/12/03/
Baby Steps
6th April 2019, 19:55
The following article links in various corrupt groups to the Skripal poisonings. If Skripal was up to his neck in corruption now - surely he would have 'insurance files' to protect himself?
Elite Paedophiles may have poisoned the Skripals to cover up Russian money laundering
Elite Paedophiles Faked Nerve Gas Attack In Salisbury
By
Mark Anthony Taylor, @Shyreman
• All of the heads of the UK judiciary are involved in a paedophile ring.
• Parliament covered it up.
• Theresa May arranged it.
• The same judiciary covered up Russian money laundering.
• The Skripals may have been poisoned on the orders of paedophiles to cover up the crimes of the judiciary.
There is a suspicion that MI-5 blackmailed Donald Trump to stop him taking down the DNC via the scandal of Pizzagate. Pizzagate via its various nodes links into the British aristocracy. It is thus unsurprising that Theresa May and MI-5 appear to be at the very top of the Pissgate conspiracy - our government controlled media are still peddling the Russian election-rigging narrative. When Parliament expresses concerns that the Russians rigged Brexit, it is to give credibility to the notion that the Russian recidivists rigged the US general election. There is hardly ever a bad word to be said of the Clintons by the BBC, and never so from Parliament. While the relationship between George Dubya Bush to Tony Blair is often visited, Blair's stronger and more personal relationship with the Clintons is blanked out. In British politics, the Clintons are the paedophile elephant in the room.
British Intelligence is certainly capable of blackmailing the American political class because they have lent GCHQ to the CIA for information gathering on the American people. GCHQ would of course preserve a copy of its databases for the British State's own use. Britain not only has political secrets, but military secrets, such as the efficacy and vulnerability of American weapon systems. Each half in the special relationship is in bed with each other's military industrial complex. So Trump is not necessarily personally compromised, in fact he could be doing what he perceives to be in the USA's best interests.
But while politicians have dithered for the past year, distracted or embarrassed by these and other concerns, failing to yield hasty action, good folk worldwide have not rested. The paedophile scandals are paramount, and so we must endeavour to bring down the global cabal.
A keystone clue emerged last year, in November 2017 - a member of the elite, caught off guard, gave us a little titbit. The elite responsible is one Sir Terence Etherton, one of the three judges in the Gina Miller lawsuit, whose ruling could have easily evolved to disrail Brexit. At the time the Daily Mail posted an infamous hit piece with an epithet to the three judges as 'Enemies of the State.' The epithet has proven entirely prophetic as I hope I will show below.
Our titbit is a public endorsement from Etherton, reported on a few insider websites - “It appears that the only club of which our new LCJ is or has been a member is the Pizza Express Club."
The endorsement was laid on the shoulders of the newly appointed Lord Chief Justice Sir Ian Burnett, who replaced the former Lord Chief Justice, Baron Thomas, in October of 2017.
One would think that with Pizza being known globally now as a codeword used by paedophiles for 'child sex victim' that Etherton would be more careful with his words. Etherton associates 'pizza' with 'club.' The suspicion should occur to any intelligent man that Etherton is bragging that Burnett is a member of a paedophile ring. Do we really believe that a judge of the Court of Appeal, who recently saw his mansion sold for $3,000,000 has a diet of take-away Pizza? Burnett is 59. Most 59 year old men do not have the digestive systems that can handle a regular diet of pizza.
Etherton is famous in the judiciary for being married to a man. The wedding was a Jewish ceremony, and indeed it took place at the West London Reform Judaism Synagogue.
Neither of the pair look particularly effeminate so one must speculate whether they get their kicks by working together on a vulnerable third person. Indubitably Etherton is part of the gay sex culture in which such deceptive slang as Pizza was invented.
Now Terence Etherton is not just a frequent visitor to the West London Synagogue, he was director of it, from November of 2014 to November of 2016.
A notable memorial service was undertaken in the synagogue on the 20th May 2015, for Sir Leon Brittan. Mr Brittan was accused of burying a dossier of elite paedophiles handed to him by MP Geoffrey Dickens. Conveniently Britain died just before he was due to give an explanation, however some of the documents he had hidden emerged the day after his death.
Overseeing Terence Etherton is the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman, headed by Paul Kernaghan. Kernaghan, in his previous occupation as police chief is alleged to have covered up paedophile rings by two separate police officers, and is named as having taken part in Satanic ceremonies in the RAINS list (Ritual Abuse - Information Network & Support). The list named Ted Heath and Cyril Smith belonging to the same cult. The RAINS datum suggests Kernaghan was not just covering up paedophile rings, he was active in them.
(The RAINS list also alleges that Peter Mandelson, Commissioner of the EU, one of the architects of mass immigration in the UK, conspired to torture and murder a boy called Kevin and have his body dumped at sea).
Whoever put Kernaghan into power had to know his background. Recently it was disclosed that Theresa May had covered up the investigation against Cyril Smith. So we can figure Kernaghan's appointment is probably May's handiwork yet again. Insiders tell me May has done what Brittan did - destroy dossiers on elite paedophiles, and this is entirely consistent with the article linked above. It is a fact that the MI-5 knew that MPs and prosecutors had lied to protect Smith and the MI-5 did nothing. The MI-5 ultimately answer to the Prime Minister. Theresa May also put Elizabeth Truss into position as Lord Chancellor. Truss covered up a paedophile training programme in the judiciary that resulted in the abduction, rape and murder of children. Though his name is not mentioned in the exposé of that, Lord Chief Justice Baron Thomas would have to have signed off that programme. Following Truss came Lord Chancellor David Liddington who appointed Sir Ian Burnett to become Thomas's successor.
With May, Truss, Kernaghan and Thomas all covering up the abduction, rape and murder of children, then they needed someone as compromised as Thomas to take Thomas's spot. Thus our eye must narrow upon Burnett. The pizza reference was most certainly spot-on. Gay-cultured Etherton knew what he was talking about.
Serving as senior rabbi at the West London synagogue was Julia Neuberger. She is sister-in-law to Baron David Neuberger who was President of the Supreme Court in the UK at the time of the Miller hearing in November of 2016. David Neuberger's wife states on her website that she makes videos for the EU Commission. Neuberger, as head of the Supreme Court, handled the government's appeal against the High Court's verdict, so that it could avoid having to consult Parliament to advance the Brexit process. There was obviously a conflict of interest with Neuberger's family profiting from the EU and indeed his wife was exposed for tweeting a Remainer stance.
Prior to Miller's hearing I had written a letter of complaint directly to Etherton and Truss, exposing that the Miller hearing was rigged by Baron Thomas and the Attorney General, Jeremy Wright, with the intention that the government should lose. I did not know at the time that Truss had been involved in the paedophile programme. When I wrote of the duplicity to President Neuberger, I had no idea Neuberger's sister-in-law was effectively under the power of Etherton, since Etherton was her boss at the Synagogue. I would guess that Neuberger is a regular attendee of the West London Synagogue and probably socializes with Etherton in that venue. Neuberger had the paper trail from me showing Etherton had covered up Thomas's corrupt links with the Attorney General.
There is also the case of Jeffrey Epstein providing Lolita services to the British elite. Epstein is Jewish and the evidence tells us that Epstein's Island was Mossad's blackmail operation. There is the real possibility that Epstein's network in London would have been routed from the West London Synagogue. The result of that network was the appointment of Jes Staley to the CEO of Barclays. The FOIA referred to in that link proves the UK Treasury Select Committee covered up Epstein's lobbying by lying to the press about it. My constituency MP, Jeremy Lefroy, has not denied any of it and he has had months to investigate.
The speaker of the House of Commons, one of the most powerful men in Britain, John Bercow, is set to leave office. Replacing him has been fielded a most impious candidate, Harriet Harman. Harman was disgraced some years ago when it was discovered she ran an advocacy group that included PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, that lobbied for the same freedom to be found in Saudi Arabia – the freedom to marry anyone of any age. PIE was set up by a homosexual man, and its existence and agenda was held secret by a circle of gays, in other words it was a homosexual paedophile ring and advocacy group. Harman remains unapologetic to this day. Also in Harman's group was Lord Justice Fulford, who, when quizzed on the matter gave a pitiful defence that he had no memory of the events. For a man who spent all day listening to litigants and suspects under oath it was hardly a decisive statement. It seems Lord Chief Justice Baron Thomas was surrounded by men and women involved in paedophilia and things have got worse under Burnett, the pizza-lover.
Burnett also covered up Deutsche Bank's money laundering for ISIS and the Russian Mafia, with the help of the Attorney General, Jeremy Wright MP. Deutsche Bank laundered $10 billion and the FCA (the UK's Financial Conduct Authority) fined it in secret and failed to identify a single recipient of the money. This was part of a bank cartel laundering £65 billion from oligarchs illicitly transferring money from Russia into London. The cartel also included Barclays, RBS and HSBC. The laundering operation appears to have been kept secret with the help of Barclays' Jes Staley – Epstein's man once again.
The Conservative Party has received something close to £850,000 in donations from the Russian oligarchs. Thus the FCA, with their secret fines and useless investigation, supervised by the Conservatives, helped the banks get away with money laundering, and in return the Conservatives were paid off. Katheryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, refused to discipline those responsible, on the basis that it was legitimate for an MP to be bribed through party donations.
Just as the Russian bribery scandal is exposed, as if by magic, a Russian intelligence officer, Sergei Skripal, and his daughter are alleged to be poisoned by a mysterious substance in their home at Salisbury, England. The substance was allegedly identified as one of the Novichok agents. The lethal dose of a Novichok agent is estimated to be about 1-2 milligrams, or about the mass of two grains of salt. When physicist Andrei Zheleznyakov was exposed to the substance he fell ill and died six years later of complications resultant of the exposure. Reportedly 40+ people were diagnosed with Novichok poisoning in Salisbury and were well enough to be sent home. Not exactly a consistent narrative from the British government. I have sent a FOIA to the Home Office to clarify a few issues.
It is thought Skripal has Spanish bank accounts and enumerates Russian oligarchs amongst his friends. Could it be he was poisoned to stop him exposing who in Parliament took the bribe to cover up the Russian money laundering scam?
Gangsters generally have a high disposition for paedophilia – it goes hand-in-hand with sadism and psychopathy. One wonders if the Russian gangsters in and around the West London Synagogue, have been supplying children to child trafficking groups in that area. Perhaps Sir Ian Burnett knows the answers, and perhaps Skripal knew that Burnett had the answers and for that reason Skripal and his daughter were poisoned.
related:
THERESA MAY COVERED UP INVESTIGATION INTO CYRIL SMITH
(https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/theresa-may-amber-rudd-suppress-westminster-child-abuse-documents-national-security-reasons/20/11/)
onawah
6th April 2019, 23:11
Please supply the link for the article. Thanks.
The following article links in various corrupt groups to the Skripal poisonings. If Skripal was up to his neck in corruption now - surely he would have 'insurance files' to protect himself?
Baby Steps
7th April 2019, 00:03
Please supply the link for the article. Thanks.
The following article links in various corrupt groups to the Skripal poisonings. If Skripal was up to his neck in corruption now - surely he would have 'insurance files' to protect himself?
https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@shyreman/elite-paedophiles-may-have-poisoned-the-skripals-to-cover-up-russian-money-laundering?fbclid=iwar2myrsetjviu9f_-cxfpxw0vy9bkk0lnrznhwwjp4dhlbg_vmxwoq6wema
Matthew
10th April 2019, 19:27
Mark Watts
The only journalist to attend all sittings of the Westminster Child Sexual Abuse Inquiry (#CSAInquiry)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/783678017025482752/wsBzMtEa_400x400.jpg
This is a copy of his tweet rounding-up his reports. There's a lot of information there, I really could probably copy all of it here or in it's own thread.
This is really good news, but it suffers from being brushed over, so I think we are going to have to share and enjoy this for ourselves...
Share and enjoy!
(source: https://twitter.com/MarkWatts_1/status/1114233179416748034)
Mark Watts
@MarkWatts_1
Westminster hearings – #CSAinquiry – my round-up in 415 tweets…
Week 1: https://twitter.com/MarkWatts_1/status/1104846514529189890 … (https://t.co/OFuSZkXhVK)
Week 2: https://twitter.com/MarkWatts_1/status/1107204676154544128 … (https://t.co/TrK4SRl1ol)
Week 3: https://twitter.com/MarkWatts_1/status/1113893782351745026 … (https://t.co/K6scexdO6O)
Just watch how establishment’s media lapdogs will say “no evidence” of #VIPaedophile scandal.
This shows otherwise.
Valerie Villars
10th April 2019, 19:49
Well God Bless that man. He is very brave. I hope someone besides us pays attention.
Matthew
10th April 2019, 21:22
Well God Bless that man. He is very brave. I hope someone besides us pays attention.
It's good news that's for sure :)
Because it's an official government level inquiry it will register as truth to main stream media indoctrinated people.
Here's a link to the inquiry website (https://www.iicsa.org.uk/investigations/allegations-of-abuse-by-people-of-public-prominence-associated-with-westminster).
Here's the sites summary:
An overarching inquiry into allegations of child sexual abuse and exploitation involving people of public prominence associated with Westminster.
This investigation will consider evidence relating to allegations of child sexual abuse committed by persons of public prominence associated with Westminster and how these came to light; the findings of relevant investigations; whether there is evidence of conspiracy, cover-up, interference or tolerance in relation to child sexual abuse committed by persons of public prominence associated with Westminster; whether governmental, political and law enforcement institutions were aware of and took appropriate steps; and whether there are adequate safeguarding and child protection policies in place within political parties, government departments and agencies.
And sure enough the inquiry found plenty of evidence.. for example, here's Marks tweet (from the above set of links) from inquiry day five:
Mark Watts
@MarkWatts_1
After two days of evidence on how police were stopped from investigating #VIPaedophiles, today we heard of the same problem for the media...
3:14 pm - 8 Mar 2019
(direct tweet link here) (https://twitter.com/MarkWatts_1/status/1104158383337279488)
Star Tsar
11th September 2019, 10:00
Shaun Attwood
Ex-Cop Jon Wedger | London Epstein-Style Pedo Rings Protected By Police
Published 10th September 2019
Ex-Scotland Yard Detective Reveals How London Police Protect Elite Paedophile Rings
Jon's YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKqhfy9RxCVYPQJRyHOZIEw
H9TscJsVKp4
The Moss Trooper
11th September 2019, 11:30
Shaun Attwood
Ex-Cop Jon Wedger | London Epstein-Style Pedo Rings Protected By Police
Published 10th September 2019
Ex-Scotland Yard Detective Reveals How London Police Protect Elite Paedophile Rings
Jon's YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKqhfy9RxCVYPQJRyHOZIEw
H9TscJsVKp4
John Wedger is an Agent of Change. Be very careful in believing his story.
Apparently he has exposed corrupt officers in the MET police force, from rank-and-file to senior level, yet.............. Find me one name that he has brought-out publicly? Who and what has he exposed?
John Wedger had/has a very interesting relationship with Bill Maloney. The same Bill Maloney that was injected into the scene, and was instrumental in, the rubbishing of Carl Beech's testimony regarding a high-level paedo ring operating out of Westminster. The same Carl Beech that has just been handed an 18 year jail sentence for 'fabricating' his story, the story that involved Lord Janner, Leon Brittan, Ted Heath, etc, etc...... Bill Maloney is also an Agent, an Agent that has more-or-less disappeared from the scene since mission accomplished. It was through Bill Maloney that John Wedger made his entrance into the murky-world of high-level paedogate whistle blowers.
Bill Maloney was all over Youtube at one stage, a very angry, shouty man. He even travelled to Jersey to report on the Haute De La Garenne scandal....... Something I know a lot about as I have lived here for over 30 years. His mis-reporting and made-up 'facts' were shocking......... But not if your goal was to rubbish the story in the eyes of the general public, if that was his goal, then he achieved it. You can watch his doc, "Sun, Sea & Satan" on Youtube.
If you have the stomach, and the time, check-out Brian Harvey (he of East 17 fame) and see what he has to say about John Wedger & Bill Maloney. You'll find a lot more truth there than the above video. Harvey was 'used' by Bill Maloney to video an interview of Carl, I believe his first public revelation of the Westminster paedo ring, as Harvey had a lot of professional recording equipment. This is how, later on, Brian was introduced to John Wedger, who appeared out of nowhere. The veil soon slipped from Brian Harvey's face and he saw what was really going on. Wedger WILL NOT face Brian Harvey and his questions, point-blank. He WILL NOT answer the criticism or questions from many, many people that this has affected.
There is absolutely no excuse these days for internet 'researchers' to give a platform of potentially millions of people to these Agents without doing the necessary checks and background work. This could be very damaging to the REAL victims of these nefarious networks.
It is a very real fight these people are in......... Deathly so.
Star Tsar
11th September 2019, 13:11
Why not post Mr Harvey's video so we can check out your assertions TCHB?
Ratszinger
11th September 2019, 17:41
The Brits may as well give up their pedogate investigations because so long as they bow down and stop all forward progress into these investigations as soon as it leads to the inbreeders there will never be any point in continuing to deceive the public like any Brit authority, or any authority could do any thing at all! You would think the Saville case would have been the one that broke it all open but it only cracked it and it sealed right back up tight as a prison warden's behind when you ask him for money just that quick! So long as the royals can get away with whatever they want whenever they want nothing will ever change.
The Moss Trooper
11th September 2019, 18:32
Why not post Mr Harvey's video so we can check out your assertions TCHB?
No offence Star Tsar, and I say this without any malice, but go and have a look yourself. And if you are really interested in this subject, more than just a passing interest, then research the hell out of it.
Harvey's videos span many months, if not years. I remember the head-lines in the press when the assassinated his character, this has been going on for 25+ years. I'm unable to sum it up in the posting of one video. It is a very dark story, having many twists and turns. Odd characters popping out of nowhere and disappearing just as quickly. People being targeted and taken out, jailed, threatened, silenced, whatever is required.
Star Tsar
12th September 2019, 01:42
This is a public forum so if one makes an assertion then one should really provide some kind of evidence to be fair.
Mr Harvey sums up your claims in one twenty minute video.
Anyone interested please skip to 2:38
KBtAWquCFqo
Baby Steps
19th February 2020, 06:43
A QUICK SUMMARY OF THE ROYAL CONNECTIONS
with thanks to Jackie Von Guyot and Charles Frith
"Queen Elizabeth's household is at the centre of a vast paedophile network. It is implicated in the KINCORA child abuse scandal through Lord Louis Mountbatten and Anthony Blunt. It is implicated in the ELM GUEST HOUSE child abuse scandal through Anthony Blunt, senior palace aide Richard Langley and Commander Michael Trestrail, the Queen's bodyguard. It is implicated in the DOLPHIN SQUARE abuse scandal through the vacation partner of the Duchess of Cornwall Derek Laud, and through John Henniker-Major: both of whom supplied children to the Dolphin Square 'VIP' paedophile ring. The Queen's household is implicated in the NORTH WALES ABUSE RING not only through Derek Laud, but through the Queen's friend and lady-in-waiting Dame Mary Anne Morrison, sister of paedophile MP Sir Peter Morrison. It is implicated in the notorious PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE (PIE) through a number of staff and advisers to the Queen: including her cook Douglas Slade, trusted senior diplomats Robert Coghlan and Sir Peter Hayman, and the late head of the Queen's Silver Jubilee Trust/PIE collaborator Sir Harold Haywood. The royal household is implicated in the HAUT DE LA GARENNE and DUNCROFT paedophile scandals through the extraordinary privileges afforded to abuser and procurer Sir James Savile: adviser and close friend of Princes Charles and Andrew, the late Lord Mountbatten, the Duke of Edinburgh and Princess Alexandra. Numerous royal staff have reported being sexually assaulted and raped in the Crown palaces. Moreover, butler Paul Kidd operated a paedophile ring from Buckingham Palace. For further details of these and other crimes in which the Queen's household is implicated, please read or download the PDF document."
https://www.scribd.com/doc/246043736/Buckingham-Palace-at-the-centre-of-a-vast-paedophile-network?fbclid=IwAR1ICwNGEhWJ4jz3auI8-38Eb7hLKqAD_59lBO8xORH701IxlIlAnnPMEH0
Baby Steps
17th March 2020, 19:50
Is Prince Phillip still alive?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM_RlWkE52w
Baby Steps
27th June 2021, 12:16
Why Hancock may really be being taken out
This from Miri Anne:
“MATT HANCOCK IS NOT HAVING AN AFFAIR
Or, let me rephrase that - if he is, it's not with an age-appropriate adult female. At the highest levels of politics such as he inhabits, people are controlled by their blackmailability, and a married man having a bit on the side at the office is simply not scandalous enough these days as material with which to control someone.
Lest we all forget, Hancock was exposed as having spent £50,000 of tax-payers' money on nine "takeaways" from a tiny and obscure East London restaurant, which had a password-protected secret menu, with "pizza" as the starring item.
The 'office affair' story is clearly completely staged. I watched the "HandsFaceA*se" video, and it looks utterly theatrical and ridiculous - it is quite clear to me that they are acting. It is just far too cliched an interpretation of the 'secret office affair' to be real - rendezvousing in an empty workroom for a clandestine embrace (where there just so happens to be CCTV that they have both conveniently forgotten about). Wealthy, well-connected players like Hancock have discreet, out-of-town plush flats for that sort of thing, they don't need to sneak off for a snog in the stationary cupboard.
Plus. if the health secretary really was having an affair in the middle of a national pandemic, the press would just be slapped with a D-notice and forbidden from reporting on it, it being paramount the public retain confidence in the government at such a crucial time, threat to national security, etc. etc.
The reason Hancock's wife and the aide's husband seem so singularly unbothered about this episode, is because this has all been scripted and set up well in advance, and they're fully in the know and all for it - just like any supportive stage spouse would be. That in addition to the fact that, at that level, people don't get married because they love or even particularly like each other - it's all far more strategic and about money, power, connections, etc. - the "old-fashioned" reasons.
So, why has Hancock faked an affair, you may ask? It's because we've moved into the next stage of the overlords' agenda, which is revealing all national governments and major institutions (such as the Monarchy) as fraudulent and corrupt to their core, so they can be swept aside with full public approval, in preparation for the one world government.
We will systematically see all the major players behind the plague pantomime be revealed as completely corrupt: as philanderers, charlatans, and liars. We've already seen the fall of Neil Fergusson and Dominic Cummings, now it's Matt Hancock's turn, and the others will follow like dominoes. Plus, we're going to see new facts uncovered about Princess Diana's death, too, which has suddenly hit the headlines again, where the Royals will be indicted and charged with murder, the final blow for that rapidly toppling house of cards (I note Prince William is just about the only Royal who hasn't been viciously smeared in the press lately, and it has been suggested in the past he is the overlords' choice for one-world government leader).
Of course, the final push to get everyone in favour of a one-world government is an extreme external threat against which all the world's countries must unite to defeat, so cue fake holographic alien invasion.
It's going to be an interesting next few months...”
Matthew
17th October 2021, 22:56
Peter Wells: I was unlucky enough to speak to a friend of one of his victims this evening. In this conversation Peter Wells was described as a master manipulator. ...
Simon Lythgoe is a famous(?) TV guy, but I don't watch telly. To me, I know nothing about Simon Lythgoe except he has done something exceptionally brave to come forward and tell his story of being a victim of child sexual abuse like this. He followed a previous case in December 2018, in which the victim remained anonymous, but Simon, the second of Well's victims to come forward, waved his animosity to tell his story. It's harrowing reading, because of the detail, and the sharing of the victims mother's guilt, and the very nature of the psychological manipulation that goes along with the abuse.
Parents tell children monsters aren't real, but they are. I think they say that to convince themselves rather than the children. This might sound harsh but the more details people know the more other parents can guard against it. Nobody likes this truth but that's one of the ways the abuse manages to hide, because people don't want to believe it. Simon is part of the solution because it's at the cost of trauma for him and his family; it would have been easier to bury it.
><><><><><><><
Prep school deputy head, 75, who sexually abused young boys in the 1980s including son of 'Popstars' judge and TV mogul Nigel Lythgoe, is jailed for 16 years
Peter Wells, 75, sexually assaulted children at Keble Prep School in north London
TV producer Simon Lythgoe, 46, bravely uncovered abuse in his fight for justice
Simon said he forgave him for 'acknowledging truth' and not pursuing a trial
By RORY TINGLE, HOME AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT FOR MAILONLINE and MAX AITCHISON FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 14:01, 14 September 2021 | UPDATED: 17:15, 14 September 2021
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9989361/Keble-Prep-school-deputy-head-75-abused-boys-jailed-16-years.html
A former prep school deputy head who abused young boys including the son of 'Popstars' judge Nigel Lythgoe is set to die in prison after he was jailed for 16 years.
Peter Wells, 75, sexually assaulted children while working as a deputy headmaster at Keble Prep School in Winchmore Hill, north London.
The former scout leader was jailed for 15 years in 2018 after three of his victims came forward and police began to investigate his sickening crimes.
But he had another year added onto his sentence today for offences against TV producer Simon Lythgoe, 46, and a second boy.
Mr Lythgoe, who lives in the US, became aware of Wells' first court appearance in 2018 when his friend read about it in the Evening Standard.
At this point he bravely decided to reveal his own abuse at Wells' hands, and police flew out to LA to take evidence from him.
As with the paedophile's first trial, he initially denied responsibility and was set to plead not guilty, but later changed his plea.
...
Hermoor
26th January 2022, 01:13
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEWeklIWQAIwKOS?format=jpg&name=small
Spiral
26th January 2022, 07:26
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEWeklIWQAIwKOS?format=jpg&name=small
The police have known it's been going on for a LONG time & did nothing, they need to answer for that.
mountain_jim
8th September 2022, 18:14
With Queen news today, I ran into these recent links
Brian Cates (https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/53351)
How many of you knew the German family The Battenburgs rebranded themselves following WWII as...The House of Windsor?
https://paulserran.substack.com/p/lord-mountbatten-the-grandfather
Lord Mountbatten: The Grandfather of All Royal British Sex Scandals - PART 1
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F761fc980-f802-48d4-b652-d1717522d55d_445x407.png
Prince Andrew’s alleged sexual crimes, bad as they are, are nothing but smokescreen to distract attention of the public from the problem that never goes away: the legacy of Lord Mountbatten, a gigantic figure in the Windsor dynasty, and the center of the most troubling allegations of sexual crimes against children.
This could well be the breaking point of British society with the Royals – and that’s why Andrew is at once a problem – for raising awareness of Royal misconduct – and a patsy, for taking the public fall after other family members have credibly been accused of doing much, much worse.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ad2a375-1a48-414a-9614-6f3af994149b_282x300.jpeg
Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma
In 2019, Andrew Lownie, the author of a book on Lord Mountbatten, denounced the secrecy that continues to surround the child sex abuse allegations concerning the murdered royal, at a time when the public is demanding greater openness over such claims, as in the allegations about Prince Andrew.
“Why do we never hear the same demands for disclosure about the cover-up of Lord Mountbatten’s death and the involvement of the state in suppressing the [reporting on] trafficking and sexual exploitation of young boys from London and Kincora House?”
< more at link >
////
https://paulserran.substack.com/p/lord-mountbatten-the-grandfather-c72
[B]Lord Mountbatten: The Grandfather of All Royal British Sex Scandals - PART 2
Now that a number of victims have surfaced, Buckingham Palace has been scrambling to diffuse those claims
Paul Serran
Aug 12
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd06ae3b4-0f3b-4693-a669-c2eafa0b9ad5_554x422.png
The Anglo-Irish Vice Ring was a real-life network of pedophiles. They supplied children and teens to VIPs from England and Northern Ireland – allegedly including Lord Mountbatten and a host of upper class fiends.
It is also a story embedded in the Irish civil war and the “Troubles” in the 70’s.
Anglo-Irish relations are too big a subject to properly address here, but suffice to say a ring of wealthy British Aristocrats raping poor Northern Ireland boys would be worsening the problem considerably.
Besides the horrendous moral implications, there was also the security risk – “buggery” was a crime in England until 1967. This made homosexuals the prime targets for Intelligence services to flip them, notably the KGB with the infamous “Cambridge Five” ring of spies.
British intelligence, upon learning of the Anglo-Irish Vice Ring, rather than dismantle it, took over it to blackmail leaders of Unionism and associated paramilitary groups.
[Unionism in Ireland is a political tradition on the island that professes loyalty to the Crown and Constitution of the United Kingdom.]
This all led to the cover-up of the scandal, that could have brought Mountbatten’s bisexualism and open marriage again to the forefront – but this time tied to child rape and child trafficking of impoverished children from Northern Ireland.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2e80b789-e965-4a93-bcc0-e8f0adf9ca2b_600x600.jpeg
Now that a number of victims have surfaced, Buckingham Palace has been scrambling to diffuse those claims. Books are bought to the last copies, and shady figures steal every copy from public libraries.
If Mountbatten is exposed, this would inevitably lead to renewed interest in future King Charles’ links to Jimmy Saville, alleged serial pedophile rapist from BBC.
And that could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. So they are panicking.
< more at link >
mountain_jim
8th September 2022, 20:34
https://radaronline.com/p/prince-charles-jimmy-savile-secret-letters-pleading-help/
Prince Charles & The Pedophile: Read The Secret Letters The Royal Wrote To Sex Perv Pleading For Help
https://media.radaronline.com/brand-img/4HuWtxPRV/1600x837/prince-charles-jimmy-savile-secret-letters-pleading-help-3png-1649257063117.png
By:Connor Surmonte
Apr. 6 2022, Published 11:02 a.m. ET
Prince Charles reportedly sent hand-written letters to the late and disgraced TV presenter Jimmy Savile on numerous occasions asking for his help regarding the royal family’s public image. Now, for one of the first times ever, the letters Charles sent to Savile more than 30 years ago are coming to light.
According to Mirror, the letters Prince Charles wrote to Savile were first shown on Wednesday during a new Netflix docuseries titled Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story.
< more at link >
Brian Cates (https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/53378)
"Open secret" = something everybody in a certain community or clique knows is going on, but they never talk about it outside their circle.
People in Hollywood knew 30 years ago that Bill Cosby was drugging and raping women. But nobody talked about it outside of the Hollywood clique.
And when they did talk about it at their parties, it was a huge joke to them.
Just like the Royals having their pedo rings was an open secret in the UK for decades and a good laugh has been had by all within the clique. And serious consequences came to people who violated the protocol.
Spiral
8th September 2022, 20:59
What you have to realise is that Savile was obviously superior to them, the politicos the royals the lot, because of ...
He was telling them what to do.
The police couldn't touch him, in fact they did his bidding.
It's kinda weird how the Ripper left a dead woman outside his block of flats and at saville park, or not if you understand this stuff
In his autobiography he boasted about bedding girls, yet no one noticed.
There is one big link, Freemasons.
Satanists one & all .
Hermoor
6th May 2023, 09:38
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FvYLgvKWAAwGxsF?format=jpg&name=small
Mark (Star Mariner)
9th July 2023, 12:28
More trouble at (propaganda) mill.
-Social media in current meltdown over who this is. Speculation is rife (and quite toxic), with many names put out there, and fierce denials as a result. Threats of legal action have been issued against names wrongly smeared. But...I have heard one particularly strong rumour [who it is] and he's a very well known news presenter.
Caution: to stay safe here, refrain from posting any names
BBC presenter allegations: Urgent talks to take place
Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer will hold urgent talks with the BBC's director general on Sunday, after a presenter was accused of paying a teenager £35,000 for sexually explicit photos.
In a statement, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport called the allegations "deeply concerning".
The claims, first reported by the Sun, include that the young person's family complained to the BBC back in May.
The BBC must investigate urgently and sensitively, the DCMS said.
"As a public service broadcaster in receipt of public funding, senior officials have stressed to the BBC that the allegations must be investigated urgently and sensitively, with [DCMS] kept informed," the statement read.
Ms Frazer will speak to Tim Davie, head of the BBC, later on Sunday, it added.
In the Sun on Sunday, the mother of the young person - who the Sun claims was 17 when payments from the presenter began - said her child had used the money to fund a crack cocaine habit. She said if the alleged payments continued, her child - now aged 20 - would "wind up dead". She also claimed that an image of the presenter in his underwear, which the Sun reported on Saturday, had been taken as part of a video call with her child.
Having reportedly made the BBC aware of their concerns on 19 May, the family said they became frustrated when the presenter remained on air and they then decided to approach the Sun.
They made clear they wanted no payment for the story, the paper reported.
Following the first Sun report, some BBC presenters took to social media to deny they were the star in question, including Rylan Clark, Jeremy Vine, Nicky Campbell and Gary Lineker.
Mr Campbell, of Radio 5 Live, tweeted that he had reported an anonymous Twitter account to the police over a post claiming he was the presenter.
More: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66147003
Matthew
9th July 2023, 12:37
>> Caution: to stay safe here, refrain from posting any names
Self censorship
Matthew
9th July 2023, 21:05
The problem is pinning it down to which one?
The BBC used to be a good career move. Now its sewage is over-spilling into other people's reputation because of the omission of specific names, ... which makes people wonder who it is? And how can we not wonder?
But pan out because worst things go unnoticed. Why this and why now? It's almost like they've thrown someone under the bus.
I bring reliable information about who is innocent though, from a reliable dream. It's good news and adheres to Poe's Law.
I was reliably told in a dream that Cliff Richard, David Jason and Hew Edwards are innocent people.
https://twitter.com/MattGil03996634/status/1678126775115579392
scotslad
15th July 2023, 10:43
is it just me, or but all this hoo ha and media attentionabout the BBC and its staff just at the time Boris Johnson was under a court order to hand in his phone and whats app messages.
Talk about misdirection, he should have been a magician and conjured up a new password and log of all his calls and messages to comply with the court order 😉
Everyone seems to have forgotten (at least the Sun newspaper and others - have)
Matthew
18th July 2023, 13:25
is it just me, or but all this hoo ha and media attentionabout the BBC and its staff just at the time Boris Johnson was under a court order to hand in his phone and whats app messages.
Talk about misdirection, he should have been a magician and conjured up a new password and log of all his calls and messages to comply with the court order 😉
Everyone seems to have forgotten (at least the Sun newspaper and others - have)
I thought as much and said so in the post above. The joke is on us; behaviour like that is more common in the BBC than typical people's lives so why now?
I can't believe this forum was nervous to self censor, shame on you.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.