Contact Has Begun 2 - The James Gilliland Story Continues

[DeeMetrios]

I thought i best post this here seperately as it really is great viewing ....

zQ8MdD-Mung

cheers !:sun:

[Mike Gorman]

I always loved that song from Patti Smith, 'People have the power', it really does summarize the essential nature of a lot of this, returning the power to the people who have been asleep for so long.

[mojo]

that was a great capture at 31:08 and hope others check that time stamp to see it. IMO its one of James best captures and I think its one larger object changing in number of illuminations. He posted that segment before and it was great to see.

[ripple]

that was a great capture at 31:08 and hope others check that time stamp to see it. IMO its one of James best captures and I think its one larger object changing in number of illuminations. He posted that segment before and it was great to see.

Why are some people disposed to see such events (31.08) as evidence of anything more than a natural light source acting in unusual ways ? We also know that there are many double and treble satellites ( flying in tandem) out of the total population which I understand is now around the 10 000 mark . We also are aware that sceptics who have stayed at the farm have seen many unexpected light sources but only ones that moved in straight lines and at steady speeds . Activity which in total which might point to the unusual but in itself has absolutely no direct link to conclusions involving non human entities .
JG and his friends choose to associate such lights with other dimension sources which apparently give advice on how we should best conduct ourselves for our own sakes and that of the planet . But such advice only matches ' common sense ' from those already here who have trained eyes and minds to examine the 'larger picture" . Have we ever had any advice on any major topic of possible concern from these people ( the JGs of this world ) that usefully adds to matters which have not been already developed and aired here by experts and specialists ? Am I mistaken ?

[DeeMetrios]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

[ripple]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

I was inviting that type of response .
But let's have even the hint of some meat on your bone . It is the reasons for a dogmatic stance that are of interest. Being uninterested to identify your reasons for support of a mini belief system could be seen as a display of cognitive dissonance .

[Sunny-side-up]

that was a great capture at 31:08 and hope others check that time stamp to see it. IMO its one of James best captures and I think its one larger object changing in number of illuminations. He posted that segment before and it was great to see.

Why are some people disposed to see such events (31.08) as evidence of anything more than a natural light source acting in unusual ways ? We also know that there are many double and treble satellites ( flying in tandem) out of the total population which I understand is now around the 10 000 mark . We also are aware that sceptics who have stayed at the farm have seen many unexpected light sources but only ones that moved in straight lines and at steady speeds . Activity which in total which might point to the unusual but in itself has absolutely no direct link to conclusions involving non human entities .
JG and his friends choose to associate such lights with other dimension sources which apparently give advice on how we should best conduct ourselves for our own sakes and that of the planet . But such advice only matches ' common sense ' from those already here who have trained eyes and minds to examine the 'larger picture" . Have we ever had any advice on any major topic of possible concern from these people ( the JGs of this world ) that usefully adds to matters which have not been already developed and aired here by experts and specialists ? Am I mistaken ?

Hi ripple good to have both sides of the observational mind.

but don't make the mistake of lumping all in one little box
AT POINT 48:

You see/hear Jimmy talking about what he watched/experienced in the sky's there.
there where lights that did't just move in straight lines :)

If is was flying along in my craft I would't be zig-zaging around as if I was undecided where I was going, I would probably just be calmly coasting in a along in a straight line :sun:

[OmeyocaN777]

Ancient Anomalies In Egypt: Evidence Of Pre-Dynastic Megalithic Remains

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BQPur_yPoA&index=2&list=WL&t=0s
At 1'25'' Brien Foerster speaks about boomerangs found in Egypt...???!!
So there must be a connection from what Gilliland said about the Egyptian gold came from Australia (35min in the video).
Also here:
Could Ancient Egyptians Have Explored Australia?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngra1121jM

[DeeMetrios]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

I was inviting that type of response .
But let's have even the hint of some meat on your bone . It is the reasons for a dogmatic stance that are of interest. Being uninterested to identify your reasons for support of a mini belief system could be seen as a display of cognitive dissonance .

Ok Ripple , How come we do not get this type of activity in other places around the globe ?
You are saying that it normal & can be explained .
What occurs at Eceti Ranch does not happen everywhere and its not normal activity in your average night sky .
cheers

[mojo]

Countless hours skywatching and many years later I still dont know much but one thing there are UFOS in our skies and visiting. Also one learns what is abnormal a little better after hundreds of observations. Here is a collection of the unusual things captured here in the Pacific Northwest over 9 years and still going..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAmC3f_PeOE

[CurEus]

Over time and a few degrees in Anthropology and Archaeology I am of the opinion tat we do not enjoy access to all of the "facts"......much is hidden and much more cannot be spoken about/to without obliterating any hope of a "career".
It "seems" that much of the Western world was either more Scandinavian than Roman or Greek........which is actually is so bizarre as to be incredulous.......


I am actually at the point where I can state with some certainty....(my own bias) ...that several civilizations were"guided" by an active intelligence....but the development of these peoples and cultures were not entirely uniform. The influences of these intelligences were not always aligned........and conflicts developed........and as humans we were proxies to conflicts.

Patterns are similar with "godheads" and priests classes developed...language, culture, writing systems, laws......I do not expect they were perfectly aligned.
But I do believe they had sustained contact and trading relations...

Most Avalonians would like copious amounts of hard evidence to support what I posit.....all I can state at the moment is that it "seems to fit well" to oppose standard academic narratives.
I no longer accept standard academic positions.....because they cannot produce the evidence I would accept......and I'm not really offering anything more than a hunch.......or a notion.
Well THAT is just awesome! :) I just destroyed my own perspective by producing nothing of value.....

They have been caught out in to too many fabrications and lies...That, many understand well.

[justntime2learn]

Countless hours skywatching and many years later I still dont know much but one thing there are UFOS in our skies and visiting. Also one learns what is abnormal a little better after hundreds of observations. Here is a collection of the unusual things captured here in the Pacific Northwest over 9 years and still going..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAmC3f_PeOE

Hi Mojo,

Have you been to the ranch in Trout Lake next to Mount Adams?

I'm planning a trip this summer as it's only a three-hour drive.

Message me if you're interested in meeting up sometime at the ranch.

Cheers, J

[ripple]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

I was inviting that type of response .
But let's have even the hint of some meat on your bone . It is the reasons for a dogmatic stance that are of interest. Being uninterested to identify your reasons for support of a mini belief system could be seen as a display of cognitive dissonance .

Ok Ripple , How come we do not get this type of activity in other places around the globe ?
You are saying that it normal & can be explained .
What occurs at Eceti Ranch does not happen everywhere and its not normal activity in your average night sky .
cheers

Not getting something in locations 'a' to' m ' does not validate or say anything about matters that might or might not happen at location 'z' .
Regardless ,it might be , for example , that certain types of people tend to congregate together and unconsciously feed off each other .Also , watch any top illusionist in action . There is a population sector -- say around 20% -- that can be encouraged to believe in almost anything short term and change behaviour accordingly . Particularly when hypnotised .
All of this is quite separate from events that happen in certain spots which seem strange and inexplicable today but actually might or will have very mundane explanations tomorrow , once scientific method is employed or following new discoveries.
Remember how people used to swallow Seance happenings and 'messages' and 'predictions ' from the Ouija board .Could be that this is the same type of effect .
All just my opinion .

[conk]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

I was inviting that type of response .
But let's have even the hint of some meat on your bone . It is the reasons for a dogmatic stance that are of interest. Being uninterested to identify your reasons for support of a mini belief system could be seen as a display of cognitive dissonance .

From reading a number of your posts, you seem to be a hard skeptic. No amount of evidence is enough for you. For skeptics, too much is never enough.

[ripple]

Am I mistaken ?

I think you are ......

I was inviting that type of response .
But let's have even the hint of some meat on your bone . It is the reasons for a dogmatic stance that are of interest. Being uninterested to identify your reasons for support of a mini belief system could be seen as a display of cognitive dissonance .

From reading a number of your posts, you seem to be a hard skeptic. No amount of evidence is enough for you. For skeptics, too much is never enough.


Not sure how a hard skeptic differs from just a usual run of the mill skeptic . But why would you believe in anything with claimed certainty if , for example , you could not find supporting evidence of at least a very high probability level . And isn't the usual accepted level a minimum of 95% confidence ?
That does not prevent me having day dreams and allowing the possibility of a myriad strange and wonderful matters being just around the proverbial corner . The Doubting Thomas syndrome can still be held by someone who enjoys fun, laughter and mad cap speculation .
But we rarely get hit by speeding cars or ideas because we constantly check both up , down and sideways . imho.

[DeeMetrios]

well said conk .....
ripple , i very much doubt you have experienced any type of unusual energy or synchronicity in your life , and i am almost certain you have not seen any ufo's also .
If you have i would be interested to hear about yr experiences

[Zanshin]

Another great presentation from James - heaps of footage, a range of different scenarios.

enUejpqLJKs

[ripple]

well said conk .....
ripple , i very much doubt you have experienced any type of unusual energy or synchronicity in your life , and i am almost certain you have not seen any ufo's also .
If you have i would be interested to hear about yr experiences

You effectively made three assertions / predictions and only one out of the three was correct .
And the one you did get right was a guess that probably correctly applies to 99.9% of all people .
Perhaps you should rethink whatever it was that you imagined you were doing . And I graciously decline your no doubt well intended offer for me to share my own extremely unusual experiences .

[5th]

Surely if we see a distant unidentified light in the night sky and it splits into two (or three) the sensible assumption is that it was two planes one behind the other one of which changed course?

To jump to the conclusion that it's a UFO that 'morphed' into two could only happen if you want it to be a UFO and observe everything through that filter. It proves nothing.

Similarly, lights changing brightness is much more likely to be a plane light which then points right at us. To me it's pointless footage. Yes, extra terrestrial UFO do exists but these kinds of videos could be anything...

UFO enthusiasts see everything through that filter.

[ripple]

Surely if we see a distant unidentified light in the night sky and it splits into two (or three) the sensible assumption is that it was two planes one behind the other one of which changed course?

To jump to the conclusion that it's a UFO that 'morphed' into two could only happen if you want it to be a UFO and observe everything through that filter. It proves nothing.Similarly, lights changing brightness is much more likely to be a plane light which then points right at us. To me it's pointless footage. Yes, extra terrestrial UFO do exists but these kinds of videos could be anything...UFO enthusiasts see everything through that filter.

Yes , the footage they present is invariably redundant because it only effectively gives us a repeat of what has been previously presented . Possible anomalies but without causal explanations .
It is a shame that those who cling to such a narrow world view are rarely swayed to be more scientific and rational in their conclusions .We skeptics are not inflexibly opposed to the idea of ex terrestrial UFOs . We simply look forward to satisfactory and sufficient evidence for it . And it is very unlikely that such evidence will ever be provided by only video /photo 'testimony ' and without other sorts of hard support .

[DeeMetrios]

well said conk .....
ripple , i very much doubt you have experienced any type of unusual energy or synchronicity in your life , and i am almost certain you have not seen any ufo's also .
If you have i would be interested to hear about yr experiences

You effectively made three assertions / predictions and only one out of the three was correct .
And the one you did get right was a guess that probably correctly applies to 99.9% of all people .
Perhaps you should rethink whatever it was that you imagined you were doing . And I graciously decline your no doubt well intended offer for me to share my own extremely unusual experiences .

I see ... You have arrived recently in a burst of eloquent negativity & you have further cloaked yourself in secrecy ....fantastic work mate .

[ripple]

well said conk .....
ripple , i very much doubt you have experienced any type of unusual energy or synchronicity in your life , and i am almost certain you have not seen any ufo's also .
If you have i would be interested to hear about yr experiences

You effectively made three assertions / predictions and only one out of the three was correct .
And the one you did get right was a guess that probably correctly applies to 99.9% of all people .
Perhaps you should rethink whatever it was that you imagined you were doing . And I graciously decline your no doubt well intended offer for me to share my own extremely unusual experiences .

I see ... You have arrived recently in a burst of eloquent negativity & you have further cloaked yourself in secrecy ....fantastic work mate .

Any suggestions as to how that might translate into English ?
I am not your mate either literally or figuratively and I do not do UFO impressions by cloaking and uncloaking .
As I said previously , you made three assertions and two were incorrect . And the other will only be right in something like one instance in every one thousand . Prompting the thought --- needs to do better .
Asking questions and being cautious about accepting new presentations has no link to secrecy . Socratic might be more apposite .

[Sunny-side-up]

Back to topic sounds like a good way forwards here.

[DeeMetrios]

Back to topic sounds like a good way forwards here.

I agree with you sunny side up .
ripple .... im sure you got the meaning of my message ..

[DeeMetrios]

well said conk .....
ripple , i very much doubt you have experienced any type of unusual energy or synchronicity in your life , and i am almost certain you have not seen any ufo's also .
If you have i would be interested to hear about yr experiences

You effectively made three assertions / predictions and only one out of the three was correct .
And the one you did get right was a guess that probably correctly applies to 99.9% of all people .
Perhaps you should rethink whatever it was that you imagined you were doing . And I graciously decline your no doubt well intended offer for me to share my own extremely unusual experiences .

I see ... You have arrived recently in a burst of eloquent negativity & you have further cloaked yourself in secrecy ....fantastic work mate .

Any suggestions as to how that might translate into English ?
I am not your mate either literally or figuratively and I do not do UFO impressions by cloaking and uncloaking .
As I said previously , you made three assertions and two were incorrect . And the other will only be right in something like one instance in every one thousand . Prompting the thought --- needs to do better .
Asking questions and being cautious about accepting new presentations has no link to secrecy . Socratic might be more apposite .

you over cooked yr excuse ripple , & now yr gone ,, hahaha
Anyway back to topic .
A video worth watching , An Official Eceti production .

The Uncontrolled Narrative
Is about the UFO cover up, and how the real disclosure comes from the people.

Featuring James Gilliland, John Vivanco, Teresa Yanaros, Jimmy Church, Jordan Sather, Mary Rodwell, Clifford Mahooty, Greg Sullivan, Peter Maxwell Slattery, Billy Carson, Steve Murillo, Cathy Whittenburg Leidall and Kenzie Kazme.

Released 24th of August 2018

6wdXH3_veic