Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

[Lefty Dave]

http://www.dieholdfoundation.com/

Greetings Avalonians...

Spent a few weeks studying this information ....can't make up my mind on whether it is valid or not...though Dr Douglas Vogt seems to have documented his research quite well...and brought the science and the theology together to show that pole shifts and ice ages seem to correlate ...
If you click the books highlighted there are videos of Dr Vogts' lectures ...and many many more available on you tube...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZWMWtwZ9MI

If this sort of research interests you, I'd be grateful for your input...Blessings
end of line.

[ripple]

Dave , I suggest , in the strongest possible terms , that you look at the work carried out at Northumbria University in Newcastle Upon Tyne , here in England . And specifically at the team work headed by Valentina Zharkova .
It is of mind blowing significance and overturns almost everything that rests in current status quo thinking within the field of warming / climate change .Her work is peer reviewed to the highest standards the only problem is that it effectively shreds everything that political institutions like the bogus and pseudo scientific IPCC have served up .
.https://youtu.be/SHGbri7gWWw
The best way to introduce the work is to watch this referenced video . Even if the pseudo IPCC temperature increase forecasts were scientifically supportable --- from man made activities , Z's work shows that they must be offset by a temperature fall some six times greater than that, and starting now but in full flow by next year ( 2020).Due to a Grand Solar Minimum with the four magnetic fields in the sun out of phase ( not two fields as previously conjectured ) plus the sun being much further away from us during the following three 11 year cycles , we will move into a mini ice age .
The research model has performed at 97% accuracy and can be compared to 150 other different models variously used which range from poor to rubbish in terms of prediction accuracy -- a bit like successive IPCC figures and updates .
I have no way of usefully commenting on Vogts work linking events to a code contained in the Hebrew alphabet and sacred writings and I am not personally interested in that aspect .
Be aware that though the Newcastle findings have been available for some time , a formal presentation of key findings was held back until very recently . Simply because VZ was not prepared to open up her work to criticism from political / globalist interests and those scientists whose whole world view will be changed forever .However much they scream and struggle and probably resort to personal attacks and ridicule .

[Bill Ryan]

The Diehold Foundation website (http://www.dieholdfoundation.com) (which please do note: is amateurish, with a number of minor uncorrected typos in a presentation that tries to be professional) contains this interesting statement:

We believe we can determine what side of the earth will be facing the sun when it novas during the next geomagnetic reversal (polar reversal).
That's hard to credit, as of course the Earth is spinning like a top (period: 24 hours :) ), and so anything generated by the sun to affect the surface of the planet is always hitting quite a rapidly moving target.

And a nova? That's definitely not the right term to use. If the sun went into 'nova', we'd all be fried (or grilled). As best I know, there's no evidence this has ever happened before.

Of course, there may be a correlation between magnetic reversals and major climate change: one theory being considered at the moment is that a weakening magnetic field (preceding a reversal, probable timescale unknown) allows more cosmic rays to impact the atmosphere, thickening cloud layers and thereby increasing the albedo (reflectivity) of the planet.

What that means in simple terms is that more of the sun's heat gets reflected back off the cloud layers, resulting in cooling. That's just one of several solar-connected factors that might be affecting us all quite soon. (But a 'nova'... No.)

[5th]

If a grand solar minimum comes (more likely than a pole shift) and we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...

[ripple]

we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...


Exactly .

Billions could/will die .

Perhaps a very good reason to deflect and lie if you are the top of the food/power/ wealth chain .

[what is a name?]

At the bottom of the opening page of the dieholdfoundation.com site they have a countdown clock of the number of days to when (they say) the next Polar Shift will occur.

10126 days which is approx. 27 years

I suppose the procession of our planet, solar system and galaxy through the universe can be likened to a big spiral clock and what Mr Vogt brings to the table for evidence of a polar shift happening at regular set intervals is compelling.

[Savannah]

See the thread -Causes of the Ice Age and Nova, the Greatest Secret of the United States. Important Info

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105593-Causes-of-the-Ice-Age-and-Nova-the-Greatest-Secret-of-the-United-States.-Important-Info-

Suspicious Observer quotes his work. He is self taught but uses grounded research. He does reference the Torah and ahs some very intriguing ideas regarding how to interpret it. Some of his books are free if you have Amazon Kindle yearly membership.

[TomKat]

If a grand solar minimum comes (more likely than a pole shift) and we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...

Back in the 80s the founder of the movement was exposed by his assistant as someone who ate all the time. Have they found an ACTUAL breatharian yet?

[Savannah]

The Diehold Foundation website (http://www.dieholdfoundation.com) (which please do note: is amateurish, with a number of minor uncorrected typos in a presentation that tries to be professional) contains this interesting statement:

We believe we can determine what side of the earth will be facing the sun when it novas during the next geomagnetic reversal (polar reversal).
That's hard to credit, as of course the Earth is spinning like a top (period: 24 hours :) ), and so anything generated by the sun to affect the surface of the planet is always hitting quite a rapidly moving target.

And a nova? That's definitely not the right term to use. If the sun went into 'nova', we'd all be fried (or grilled). As best I know, there's no evidence this has ever happened before.

Of course, there may be a correlation between magnetic reversals and major climate change: one theory being considered at the moment is that a weakening magnetic field (preceding a reversal, probable timescale unknown) allows more cosmic rays to impact the atmosphere, thickening cloud layers and thereby increasing the albedo (reflectivity) of the planet.

What that means in simple terms is that more of the sun's heat gets reflected back off the cloud layers, resulting in cooling. That's just one of several solar-connected factors that might be affecting us all quite soon. (But a 'nova'... No.)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH0G7ntkMaQ



Suspicious Observer again discusses some of the Voght material and addresses the Nova question and states it may be better to described it as a Micro Nova (5:50) and could be survivable.