PDA

View Full Version : WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

Wade Frazier
18th April 2014, 11:43
Hi Ilie:

Cute. It had me going until the punch line. How do they say that in Romanian? (I put it into Google translate, and it came out like Count Dracula) :)

I am coming to the point of my essay where I get to climate change and corporate disinformation. Man, how the waters have been muddied. That entire situation is a race of the catastrophes. Will industrial civilization collapse as the fossil fuels run out? Will humanity fight World War III over the remaining oil? Will global warming begin to raise the sea levels in my lifetime high enough where it begins displacing the billions of people who will have to move for a two meter rise in sea levels? Will the oceans acidify to the point where the oceanic food chain is killed? I could go on and on with the disastrous outcomes that we are flirting with, but that is enough for now.

With FE, those can all disappear almost overnight. Anybody interested? :)

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
18th April 2014, 12:04
Cute. It had me going until the punch line. How do they say that in Romanian? (I put it into Google translate, and it came out like Count Dracula) :)


The more polite translation is "du-te dracului" (which is translated back to: "go to hell!" - and "don't come back" is implied). But you will only encounter this in TV subtitles or voice overs (or google translate!)

The translations based on sexual activity are much too rude in Romanian to be used in writing or on public forums :becky:. We are not yet using our "FU"s everywhere, however the younger generation would no longer blush if that were the case...

One could say that the English "F.U." has lost its power due to over use, while the Romanian one is still strong.

It could be a fun experiment to check how "Wolf on Wall-street" was subtitled...

OK, let's see how you'll brings this back to Free Energy now...

Wade Frazier
18th April 2014, 13:27
OK Ilie, watch this. :)

The attitude of FU is based on the zero-sum-game assumption. With FE, FU goes away. :)

The zero-sum-game assumption is baked very deeply in the human journey. Again, studying macaques shows how they know the scarcity-based economics game, and how to become dominant and make others subservient is a science in their societies. This pattern is more than thirty million years old in the human line. That is called being baked deeply. In geopolitics, the corporate world, and the like, the zero-sum-game assumptions are obvious, although there is all manner of stratagem to make it seem like it is not. As I have been writing, “philanthropy” is an old trick, but really became a science during the imperial age and the rise of capitalism and industry. Somehow, the most greedy and rapacious became heroes and saints. It is really crazed, but how the masses have lapped it up may be the most bizarre part, and is the crux of the FE conundrum, where the masses literally call the darkness the light, and vice versa. That is the death-grip that scarcity-based ideologies have over the mass mind:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

The masses imprison their own minds, with little active intervention needed by the social managers. The formula is this: get them while they are young, feed them lies, and they will accept it as reality for the rest of their lives, especially if there are carrots for playing along and sticks if they fail to. Delusions that deeply seated will not be broken by talk. Only when Joe Average has an FE device delivered to his home will he begin to wake up:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#machiavelli

That is why mass-movement efforts have never had a chance, as the very presumptions and ideological commitments of the masses make them easily manipulated. The FU policy would actually be a good one for helping wake people up, and I would have far more respect for it than all the lies that are paraded as truth, that there are rich “philanthropists” out there waiting to help (who made their fortunes in coal mining :) ), and so on.

Back to work. I may be fairly quiet for the next few days.

Best,

Wade

P.S. On a related note:

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2014-04-18/bp-manager-charge-cleaning-gulf-oil-spill-sold-1-million-bp-stock-severity-sp

That is called FU to the max.

Limor Wolf
18th April 2014, 16:00
Originally posted by Wade Frazier: " The attitude of FU is based on the zero-sum-game assumption. With FE, FU goes away. :)

One must appreciate the enlightenment in this thread when it comes to the wide comprehensive aspect, nothing is left unanalyzed : ) , thank you, sirs.
Genius is a virtue, Fu is a more popular 'virtue' which is baked deeper in the custom of our society and who knows if did not permeate into the DNA by now..

At a depth one can observe that the origin of FU is in the ancient days where hierarchy has began to take shape in the human society.
A thorough examination may reveal whether the slightly more matriarchal bonobo species is as well versed in the FU traditon as are the other Chimpanzees. The prevailing supposition is that the Romanian bonobos from the Carpathian are not trained enough in this meticulous art. Maybe eracting on two legs is not enough and actual levitation is required in order to shed the deeply rooted FU convention from the current human evolution

Now I better FO

Wade Frazier
18th April 2014, 16:47
Ah Limor:

You gave me my laugh of the morning. I am going hiking now. Maybe I’ll post a pic when I get back.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
18th April 2014, 19:15
Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "You gave me my laugh of the morning"
Mission accomplished


Originally posted by Wade Frazier: " The FU policy would actually be a good one for helping wake people up, and I would have far more respect for it than all the lies that are paraded as truth"

Sentiment understood. We reached times where it could be refreshing if someone will actually say - 'we are greedy lot and you and everything else are simply serving our needs'. In a way it is done now, by clear actions and demonstrations to the public to where this train is heading, the only question left to ask is why are the masses keep standing on their lines? which brings us back to Brian O'leary's sincere inquiry about sentience. To advocate for the population one must say that many means were taken to keep us in a dense state of matter, but the officials certainly p(l)ay (with) lip service the same way they drink their cups of cofee, without too much thinking or effort. Are we as far as we can be from a leading figure who may actually be interested in the place they themselves are inhbiting and in their neighbors and surounding environment (not as biological resources)?

These days, the costumes are in reverse, the non caring are wearing angel wings and the caring are presented as outcasts

Maybe we need some heavenly appeal (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc_VXLHorSI) soon, the real kind

Looking forward to your hiking photos, Wade. Always so uplifting and reviving for the ones like myself who live by the asphalt.

Blessings ~

Limor

Robert J. Niewiadomski
18th April 2014, 22:45
Limor, i think the reason behind "why are the masses keep standing on their lines?" is the same why people smoke despite "smoking kills" plastered over every pack. There are plenty of "Godzilla kills" messages broadcast in msm, and yet people don't believe it until it's too late.

It might work because of this though path: if tobacco kills, then why you can buy it so easily and why authorities allow it to be sold? Aren't authorities here to keep us safe? So this whole "smoking kills" must be some fable. Yeah right! Let's have another puff...

And at the same time authorities are portrayed as evildoers in lots of fiction works from the entertainment industry (the symbols masters). Most of people dismiss it out of hand for what it is presented as: a fiction. And yet the message is there. FU. In plain sight!

Sometimes i have an impression this is on purpose. To give the masses all the important information (disguised as fiction, but nevertheless it IS information) so we have no excuse of not knowing and our free will being abused. This "trick" allows Godzilla to buy some more time before negative karma gets to him closer. We are our worst enemy. Not Godzilla. For as long as we play victims and blame others for our own faults. Nobody will save us but ourselves.

We have the power to stand up :) It awaits inside each of us to be found and claimed back. Easier said than done, i know :) But it just requires one little choice to be made... Mind-boggling:confused:

Limor Wolf
19th April 2014, 08:53
Robert, I agree with you. The label with the warnings is there on the product, yet it is still so hard to believe .. the psychological side of it is encouraging actually because people (And I'm not separating myself from anyone) can often not see whatever does not exists in them, and here the masses don't see the evil.. One more positive point for humanity, alas, not quite helpful. I remember around the age of my twenties I used to question why do we have food coloring and preservatives which are poisoning in our food. It did not make any sense. And the responses were always that the benefit is probably greater than the harm. So, a default is also something that ingrained deep inside us, a third possibility of eating a fresh food and living a healthy life as a collective does not crosses the mind, there is always 'a price to pay', or as Wade calls it - a scarcity mind-set. The missing component, from whatever angle we look at it is - consciousness.

Sheding our self responibility in thinking and allowing someone else to think for us is not an encouraging trait for humanity as a whole, and then If any peek of the real reality seeps into the consciousness of the person then arises the feeling of helplesness and victimhood, and it requires a real mental strength, sometimes tremendous in power, to overcome this. A good strech of the soul for each and every one of us not to mention for those who mostly don't even relate themselves as having one. So in this way, it may not only require a one little choice to be made, but there are some real psychological and physical bumps in the road which are serious enough, as Wade's life journey shows, but that doesn't mean it can not be done. let's ponder on abundance on our planet and our ability to have it, isn't that what we are here for? How comforting to know that the universe is on our side, or more accurately, that we can re-learn and re-align ourself and be reminded of what it is to be on her side.

:)

Blessings ~

Limor


P.S

That may be a rather more 'heavy' addition, if so I do appologise for that, It is clearly evident and an over and over again repeated subject of discussion when it comes to energy conduct, history, science and spirituality of the human race that there are some parts of society who can see things and some that can't. I wonder if, Wade, you are possibly willing to relate your own thoughts on the notion of the 'survival of the fittest' and maybe also what would you have done if you have found yourself to be one of the participants in such a 'race'? and anyone else who may like to reply to this question. I am sorry if that may be a very personal one to answer, so please don't feel the need to. I am adequately admitting that this is not a random question, but rather more pertinent than we may think, as life may bring us to a crossroad where we may be led to a scenario such as this. I have my own clear stance on this, but reality appears to not always replicate what I would prefer to see and some situations seems pretty much impossible at times, Or so it seems.. Thanks.

Wade Frazier
19th April 2014, 12:45
Hi Limor:

Nice movie. :)

It was beautiful hiking yesterday, but I did not get any quality pictures (I take video, but I can’t post it here), but I will attach a couple from the past few weeks.

I took a friend to this waterfall last week:

http://www.wta.org/go-hiking/hikes/twin-falls-state-park

http://www.wta.org/go-hiking/trip-reports/trip_report.2014-03-30.1923205305/photo1_large

OK, Limor and Robert, you bring up good stuff. Yes, the whole “we warned them” aspect of what is happening has long been thought to be part of some karmic game. I doubt that it gets Godzilla and friends off the hook like they think. In fact, in that milieu, there are plenty of tales of how Godzilla and friends have some dim understanding of soul cycles, karma, and the like, and they think they can beat the “system,” because they are so clever, rich, and powerful. As I have written, they are the most deceived chumps of all:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#love

But, I actually have some respect for their position. Those of the light and those of the dark are dedicated to something other than their comfort, which is the object of worship for the masses. A dark pather probably “progresses” far more than Joe Average does in a lifetime. As I wrote about Genghis Khan in a recent chapter draft, it took hard work and a sense of dedication to slaughter millions and inseminate his harems nightly. I actually have some sympathy for the emptiness they feel inside that they feel the need to work their evil. I have had to accept that they are playing a role, maybe a critical role, in the evolution of humanity. But their game is also reaching levels where the very survival of the species and the ecosphere are at stake. For all their brilliance, they really are not too bright, because they do not listen to their hearts. Trying to become godlike through games of power, deceit, and manipulation is not playing the Creator’s game, I think. Or, it sure is not a game that I want to play.

Limor, I think I understand your question of “survival of the fittest,” but maybe not. If this reply does not seem to answer your question, just let me know. I have been doing a great deal of reading on evolution for the past several years. Darwin’s idea of descent and modification appears to be unassailable, but I would see biologists say stuff like, “Evolution has a lot to answer for,” as they see how animals play the game of survival. Apes and monkeys killing infants because they can sure does not seem like a game that a loving creator invented. One place that people like me regularly come to, when pondering the journey of life on Earth, trying to make it better, and being attacked by the predators while our friends, families, and colleagues actually cheer along the “bad guys,” while the planet is steadily made less inhabitable, is “WTF?!!!” We wonder what the hell this game is, who designed it, and why. On one level, it all seems stupid and malevolent, but on another, it seems to just be what people have chosen, and they can choose something else, but they have to want to. It may really be a test to see if we can achieve true sentience. Always, when I ponder these issues, I go back to those two worlds that Roads visited. Each one is about three hundred years into our future, and some will choose to live in this world by their decisions:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672115&viewfull=1#post672115

and others will choose this one:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

while most who live on Earth today will choose a world where George Bush the Eight is president, but China will have its “day in the sun” as imperial overlords. I know which world I am shooting to live in, and I know that what I do each today determines what road I will take.

Einstein said that he would rather be torn to bits rather than participate in warfare. But he also signed a letter to Franklin Roosevelt, asking that the USA develop nuclear weapons before Germany did. Einstein later called it the greatest mistake of his life. That is an example of even the greats being swept up in the fears of the times. It ain’t easy being here, that much I am sure of, and when I read mystical material that says that there are no spiritual lightweights on the planet right now, I believe it.

Some days, my only request to any Creator who might be listening is that I want to be brought in on the joke one day. But I also don’t want to hear from that voice in my head anymore:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice3

So, even I can see the seeming contradictions in my own stance on the issues, and it is something that I have to wrestle with. And then I realize that the wrestling is probably the point of being here. It does not mean that I have to be happy about it, however. Somebody has some explaining to do.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
19th April 2014, 14:09
Thank you, Wade, There is much that I would like to write in return, but I am filled with emotions and I need to let them pass. In the meantime I can not begin to say how much impact your insight, your work and your aim has on me, especially at this time, I thank you from the heart. Limor ~

Wade Frazier
19th April 2014, 15:13
Hi:

Here is another strategic post, as I near the end of my essay (350 pages and counting). As my readers know well, I began my journey with the inventor’s perspective:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#glimpse

to later have the businessman’s perspective:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#hitting

to then take my radicalized perspective to try to figure it all out:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#books

I got back in the saddle with Dennis, and that did not work out too well, and Godzilla subjected us to new levels of the game:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/other.htm#sting

and Dennis still tried to keep getting me back in the saddle with him:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=694872&highlight=wirec#post694872

Although it broke my heart to refuse, I could not do it anymore, and I have been taking a different path than Dennis’s since 1988. I would be lying if I said that I knew where my work was heading back in 1990, when I began to dive deeply on myriad subjects. If I had not been radicalized, I doubt that I would have much worth saying, and I have seen those around me fail to understand that, some of whom are pretty smart. I think that people have to have been there to really understand it much, and I am surrounded by people in my corner who really don’t understand what I am attempting. On one hand, it is frustrating, and on the other it has helped me comprehend the magnitude of the task before me. I will be looking for needles in haystacks, but the Internet gives me the tool to make a worthy attempt. This Avalon forum that Bill created is kind of what I had in mind several years ago, as I realized that the all-comers forums were a dead-end:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/critics.htm#troll

After I publish the essay, I will be starting my own forum, which will be different than Avalon, but I may always have a presence here, too. We will see how it goes.

I was in the dot.com industry for more than a decade, and the Internet is a tool that I am using and will continue to use, and it allows for an entirely different approach because of its cost and reach. If you would have told me in 1988 that I would have a global audience that I could interact with today (Romania, Israel, Poland, Australia, Spain, east Asia, etc.), I am not sure that I would have believed it. I have passed up more than a million dollars several times on my journey, but I have no regrets. But I am constantly besieged by well-meaning people who think that I am going to need a lot of money to do what I plan to attempt, and all I can say is that they are stuck in the old paradigm. Money only buys somebody’s effort. I am not asking anything of anybody other than their attention, so that they can become aware of highly important aspects of how our world really works, not the indoctrination version that is fed the masses. Each person that I am looking for will be devoting his/her time and energy into what I have to offer, because he/she thinks it will help. If I have to pay them or entice them to help them raise their awareness, they are not whom I am looking for. Also, people around me have suggested that I take my show on the road and press the flesh, and that reflects their naïveté, because that is the quickest way for me to have an untimely demise. Also, I am not a man of the people like Dennis and Brian O are/were, and am doing something that is really not amenable to that approach. And pressing the flesh is always part of the Level 10 approach:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

which does not work at all for solving the FE conundrum, not now. I constantly see scientists, inventors, New Agers, and other newbies trying to solve the FE riddle with all the approaches that have never come close to working. That is partly because Godzilla is alive, well, and vigilant, but that is really a pretty small aspect of the dynamic. The denial/obsession regarding Godzilla is an early-stage awareness that most people get stuck at, kind of like being stalled in a kindergarten level when we need to get at least to high school level if we are going to make a dent. It is probably fair to say that denial that Godzilla exists is like kindergarten, acknowledging his existence is first grade, and thinking that he can be snuck past, defeated in battle, exposed, negotiated with, and so on, are grade school notions. The choir has to get to at least the high school level if it is going to do any good, and there are college, post-doc, and post-graduate experiences in real world levels that are also waiting to be attained.

If I can’t raise the level of conversation to at least the high school level, my approach will not work. I have some pretty good ideas of how I want my effort to progress, but I know that it will not turn out like I envision it today, but that is the fun of blazing trails that nobody has tried before: you do not know what you will find.

If I thought that this approach held little promise, I would not be doing it. Also, I came to the approach after living through several attempts to make it happen, usually along Level 10 approaches, and I decided to do something different when I saw how futile those approaches were. If Dennis and Brian could not get anywhere with Level 10 approaches, I don’t know who can. They were the two that I always most respected in the field, and both were run out of their home nation for their trouble, survived murder attempts and other outrages, and kept on trying, even while pilloried by their “allies” in the field, and it was all quite a spectacle. As mind-boggling as their journeys were, and as great my respect for them was, I had to do something different, and here I am. I have accepted, and so has my wife, that I will be doing this until I can’t do it anymore. But the essay that I will publish by summer will likely be the last effort like it in this lifetime. I sometimes get nervous that it won’t be my best effort, and several slings and arrows have come my way as I worked on it, but I also plan to keep the essay “fresh” with periodic revisions, so that by the time I cash in my chips, it should be in pretty good shape. :) But what I will publish this summer will have to be good enough for now, and will impart most of what I am trying to teach people, so that they can eventually sing it from their hearts. That song has never been heard in chorus on Earth before, and there many people who have been pining for that song for their entire lifetimes, and may be specifically why they incarnated here. Ultimately, that is whom I am trying to reach. A choir of 7,000 attracting an audience of 100,000 and it is all over for Godzilla, and he knows it.

That is my intent, and I think it will help humanity turn the corner. It might help only a little, and it might help a lot, but it can't hurt. We will see.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th April 2014, 14:13
Hi:

This is another strategic post. What I found with Dennis’s efforts going the business route was that they were always easily defeated. They were defeated largely because of people’s greed and fear. If greed and fear did not destroy the effort in the early stages, when the predators came who wanted to kill it instead of steal it arrived, they were often masters of using greed and fear to wreck it, especially if they worked for Godzilla. The primary reason why it worked was that people were involved to save money, make a living, or get rich. The fear part was losing their jobs or investments, and the greed part was about getting rich. The effort that I plan to mount will avoid those pitfalls by never having employees and giving away whatever technology comes from the effort. It will be a completely volunteer effort. Dennis tried with volunteers, too, but he generally got what he paid for. None of the paths to FE are easy, but I saw how easily people were manipulated by playing to their fears and greed.

That is another reason why I will be looking for needles in haystacks. People who are not looking to cash in because of their involvement are exceedingly rare. But they also will not be easily manipulated, and if I can get a choir going, Godzilla will find it very hard to silence. And this is where most people have a very hard time understanding anything about my approach, and that is OK. They are the same people who deny that FE is possible, or see it as a threat to their existence. For those who doubt it is workable, here is why it could be and how it could happen.

Again, the people I am looking for are going to have a paradigm shift to abundance-based thinking before FE is delivered to their homes. They are needles in haystacks. But if I can find several thousand of them, they will be able to sing the abundance song. I cannot overemphasize that that needs to happen first. FE and the abundance-based paradigm arising from it have never been seen on Earth before, and Joe Average will not begin to understand until FE is delivered to his home:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#machiavelli

That is OK, because that is the end goal of the effort. However, the volunteers will only be carrying this load until the first true working models are demonstrated to the world. When that happens, the rest will be easy. For those who think it is a hopeless pipedream, they are not my target audience, and they really don‘t understand what FE is or means, and my essay is intended to help people understand what it means. In terms of money, FE is a many quadrillion dollar technology, for starters:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#quadrillion

But to make the kind of solid-state device that Sparky Sweet built, for instance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

would likely be pretty cheap, on the order of a few dollars per model, mass produced. And I know that the technology has already been pretty much perfected:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#underground

Again, as with the previous epochal events, Joe Average cannot even imagine the impact of FE today. It will completely change the world he knows, and right now, his only reaction is fear. It is really a crazy reaction, but fear of change has been universal because change always meant winners and losers, and nobody wanted to be a loser. With FE, the only losers will be Godzilla and friends, and all they will lose are their megalomaniacal dreams of playing God on Earth. But they can become real gods like the rest of humanity will, and true creators create with love.

There have been elements of what I will propose in prior efforts, and the Internet has also spawned elements of the approach I will propose, some of which are advocated today by FE activists, but none have ever taken it as far as I will. The closest thing to FE that has ever been on the world market was when Dennis sold his heat pump under his systems for savings program, where he put the equipment on people’s homes for free, and they only paid what the equipment was proven to save until it was paid for:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#sfs

I consider it about the most brilliant thing that Dennis ever did, and it is what made him so dangerous. Who would not want a free energy machine put on their home? Nobody. Dennis sold them like hotcakes, until the local energy interests brought the sledgehammer down on him, and it was the first time that a Godzilla asset was involved that I know of:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

In order to achieve the level of understanding that the choir will need, they have to gain an understanding of how the world really works. The world has never run on money; it has always run on energy. Money is only an accounting concept, and people who think in terms of money have been seduced by the indoctrination systems that are designed to keep them thinking egocentrically. Those people, no matter what they are involved with, always think, “What is in it for me?” That kind of self-seeking is what Godzilla has always used to defeat the effort.

Once FE devices are truly demonstrated in a working state (with a hundred thousand, highly committed people involved), not the proof of concept prototypes that have usually been demonstrated (almost always by lone inventors, who then became extremely vulnerable), the rest will be easy. The world’s governments, corporations, charities, and the like will be beating the door down to be involved. But the effort will be like a big crowd-funding effort. All money will go into making devices that will be given to the public, in every nation. All people on Earth will quickly have access to FE.

As I wrote in a previous chapter draft:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=821774&viewfull=1#post821774

in industrialized civilization today, every human doing “work” is really riding on the backs of several hundred “energy slaves.” Energy does almost all the work and creates virtually all the wealth that industrialized humans enjoy. Money has nothing to do with it, and humans provide almost none of the work. We have cleverly directed the energy through technology, but the real work is done by energy. That might be the most crucial concept that the choir will need to learn. If all wealth comes from directed energy, what happens when energy is virtually unlimited? That will be the Fifth Epochal Event.

The way that FE will come, via something that is crowd-funded by the world’s governments and corporations, will also mean the end of corporations and governments as we know them today. Money, profit, taxation, and the like will quickly become meaningless concepts in a world based on abundance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#advanced

That is a big reason why corporations and governments, with Godzilla sitting on the throne, have all been united in keeping the threat of FE at bay, because it will end their very reason for existence. But they are ruled by greed and fear themselves, and do not understand that the end of the world as they know it can mean the advent of heaven on Earth.

Again, people are not that stupid that they won’t begin to understand the ramifications of FE when they see it working. Most will initially only think of reducing their energy bills or getting rich, but that is a newbie view that should only last for a short time before that initial perspective is discarded. This kind of world can quickly begin coming into view:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

For those with Level 5 fears:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5

I have long advocated a peacekeeping force of grandmothers during the transition, and there will be a one-world government or, probably more accurately, there will be a one solar-system government, but its only charge will be safety and maintaining any infrastructure that may be needed, such as communication. But it will be highly redundant, such as the Internet, and will not be subjected to power plays and the like, and it won’t even make any sense to play the power game, not when everybody is empowered. Institutions such as prisons, armed forces, banks, hospitals, and so on will quickly become obsolete. And nobody will need to be coerced into ending those institutions. Their obsolescence will become obvious to everybody, and since concepts such unemployment, poverty, hunger, and the like will be obsolete, there is not going to anybody who will be fighting to keep their jobs, their rung on the ladder, and so on. Those attitudes will quickly be seen as relics of the Age of Scarcity. Many of today’s adults will have a hard time understanding, clinging to their outmoded views of reality, but the youth will rather easily understand, as Fuller noticed:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#college

In a world based on abundance, there will be only a few laws that everybody will easily understand. The law of love will reign. The fragile and precious biosphere will no longer be raped for human benefit. With FE and related technologies, those practices will quickly be seen as unnecessary, even insane. The asteroids, Oort cloud:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_cloud

and Kuiper belt:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt

can easily provide all of humanity’s material needs. Heck, one asteroid can provide all of the metal needs that humanity will have anytime soon, and only a few cometary bodies will provide all the other elements. Or dip into one of the gas giants and take around 0.0000000001% for human use. Again, when people begin to understand the big picture, how we live on Earth today will quickly be seen as the height of primitive barbarity. It will be little different than how “entertainments” in Rome’s Coliseum are seen as incredibly barbaric today, or how chattel slavery, which was “normal” everywhere 300 years ago, is almost unimaginable to industrialized peoples today.

The choir will have gotten over the mental and emotional hurdles that prevent the masses from even imagining the kind of world that FE and related technologies bring into view. Everything will change, and radically, but about 0.0001% of humanity will have to carry the ball at first, and they initially just need to imagine it. Once it can be imagined and sung, then action will begin to be taken, but when there is no self-seeking among those doing it (and no one person will be risking their lives and laying it all on the line, except maybe me at first, but the more I can train, and quickly, the lower the risk to me), Godzilla won’t know how to stop it other than coming into the open and declaring an open global tyranny, but he knows that if he is ever forced into that position, his days are numbered. People will not willingly submit to such evil. People play games today of turning darkness into light, and vice versa, abetted by Godzilla and friends, but nobody will stand for long for a new, massive throne atop the world. That is one of the benefits of industrialization; that “royalty” game is over, other than a few backward nations such as the UK, Japan, and the USA to a degree.

But it will all start with a relative handful of people understanding how the world really works, which includes the reality of FE and its organized suppression, but that is only an introductory concept that newbies need to learn in the first week of “school.” There are many levels of understanding beyond that, and the choir will have to go there if it will be of any use for what I have in mind.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th April 2014, 15:03
Hi:

As an addendum to the previous post, and I have written about this many times: even with the essay I will publish this year, very few who study it will be able to understand, mostly because they will not want to. Again, for those willing and capable of understanding, there will be almost nobody in their daily life that will understand or want to. That is why this will be challenging, but the reach of the Internet will also allow me to look for those needles. This will not be any kind of Level 10 effort:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

but it will be the first Level 12 effort ever mounted:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level12

Since the 1990s, I have watched friendships, family relationships, and even careers end as newbies thought that they could tell those around them about FE and work like mine. The masses are not receptive to my message, and that is OK. People mired in scarcity cannot even comprehend abundance. I will have no interest in trying to overcome people’s ego mechanisms that defend their scarcity-based worldview from the threat of abundance. I will make it very clear when I mount my forum. I am not interested in attracting the 99.9999% of humanity that is currently unwilling and incapable of understanding my message, but the 0.0001% that will. Those who want to press the flesh and spread the “gospel” are not my target audience. Proselytizing is not what I am about, and will not be what the choir is about. It will simply be a broadcast of high level interactions, what I call “singing,” and for those with ears to hear, they will come. There is not going to need to be any salesmanship or the rest of those manipulative and coercive games. The process has to be in alignment with the end goal, or it will not work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/visions.htm#idealist

There are no shortcuts. The people I seek are going to understand that and will refrain from their “bright idea” and “easy answer” approaches that newbies almost invariably propose, and they will comprehend the magnitude of the issue and engage it from a mature perspective. I will be aiming as high as I can, and we will see if enough people can aim with me, and some may even aim higher, and that is a good thing, as long as they can still keep their feet on the ground.

Best,

Wade

Dennis Leahy
20th April 2014, 15:18
"in industrialized civilization today, every human doing “work” is really riding on the back of several hundred “energy slaves.” Energy does almost all the work and creates virtually all the wealth that industrialized humans enjoy. Money has nothing to do with it, and humans provide almost none of the work. We have cleverly directed the energy through technology, but the real work is done by energy. That might be the most crucial concept that the choir will need to learn."So it bears repeating.

as does this gem:

" imagining the kind of world that FE and related technologies bring into view. Everything will change, and radically, but about 0.0001% of humanity will have to carry the ball at first, and they initially just need to imagine it."I think one of the most powerful phrases in the bible is, "In the beginning was the word", and I have used it a number of times to explain that concepts/ideas/"the word" is where change begins.

Bears repeating.

Thanks Wade. Your efforts are not Herculean, they are Atlas (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_%28mythology%29)-ian. :~)

Dennis

Wade Frazier
20th April 2014, 15:55
Hi Dennis:

Actually, Dennis (the other Dennis :) ) is more suited for the role of Atlas, but we all realized that we could not do it alone. Even several hundred people united by business opportunities (or several thousand, as Dennis’s efforts eventually reached) was easily defeated. But several thousand people motived by love, sentience, and a vision of abundance and how to make it happen? Whew. That one would be formidable.

If I can find enough people like you, this will be a cakewalk. Yes, it starts with an idea, and all previous epochal events were initiated by a handful of people, probably even one person to start, and the benefit of the energy outcome soon became evident and then it spread like wildfire. In the age of the Internet, it would spread quicker than anything else ever has, but it needs to be a mature “product” that just sits there, producing FE with no wires attached, or floats with antigravity. Those are the demos that Godzilla has prevented from public display, although some have been taken to see the wizard:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#underground

Godzilla knows that if a genuine FE gizmo was demonstrated, sitting someplace for days, weeks, months, generating FE, it is game over, especially something like what Sparky had:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

That is why everything has been strangled in its cradle long before it could ever reach that stage. But if enough people come from the place of awareness that I hope to help cultivate, then that would be very difficult to stop.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
21st April 2014, 15:11
Hi:

As my readers know, I avoid getting into FE physics and FE inventors too much, largely because the entire FE field is stuck there, in a state of arrested development. But make no mistake, there are many challenges to the Standard Model of particle physics. I have seen dozens of them over the years. Here is a recent one:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-connected-universe-theory-offers-alternative-explanation-of-gravity-and-mass-revealing-potential-new-source-of-energy-206531571.html

The problem is not that there are no FE inventors, that there are no FE physicists, that there are no FE businessmen, and so on. FE inventors, physicists, and related aspirants are a dime a dozen. The problem is the system’s inertia. That extends to scientists thinking that they know the “laws of physics,” that they never move beyond the foundational assumptions that are indoctrinated into, that they attack peers that stray from the orthodox fold, that there is no funding for such “mavericks,” and so on. But organized suppression at this level is also a big part of the inertia, keeping the herd of scientists in line by wiping out people such as Adam T. The organized suppression comes from many corners, from the local energy interests (as we found out the hard way http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run), to the federal level (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#ftc), to the Godzilla level (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#ten). Dennis has been hurt more by his “allies” than he has by those interests, as he has been stabbed in the back many times by his “allies,” as they were overcome by greed and fear. The enemy is us.

My approach that I wrote of yesterday:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=824737&viewfull=1#post824737

was informed by many years of bitter experience, and a big reason for my current approach is to help keep my pupils and allies out of trouble. As soon as money starts changing hands and people begin investing their livelihood into the effort, they become extremely vulnerable to greed and fear. When Godzilla’s agents arrive, and they always do if the effort shows any promise, they play on those emotions like master conductors, and they nearly effortlessly get people to dance to those tunes, dancing towards their own destruction while the Pied Piper plays the tune and the lemmings leap from the cliffs (I like mixing my metaphors :) ). I watched it happen repeatedly, in disbelief the first several times, and I discovered the hard way that almost nobody on Earth today has the personal integrity required to not dance and march when Godzilla begins playing the song:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

FE newbies almost invariably deny that dynamic, like those 18-year-old boys pining for the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

as they eagerly sally forth. I really don’t want to watch when I see the latest FE aspirants charging at the ramparts, oblivious to what awaits them. Only fools like Dennis, who has had the hot oil poured on him many times, has any business even trying. And the leading voices in the FE field shamelessly lie about Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#libel

and when I have pointed it out to others in the field, almost nobody even understood my objection. That is a big reason why I really do not want to have anything to do with the FE field today. Only a handful of people in it today have the right stuff. As Brian O said, it will be up to others to make it happen:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#new

and that is a big reason why I am not looking to interact with the FE field when I publish that essay. I will be looking for people outside the field. It is time for an approach that leaves the old paradigm behind.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
21st April 2014, 20:39
Hi:

I am taking a little break to write about the task at hand and navigating the FE hazards. There are several camps around this issue, and I am not in any of them. I am doing something that none of them have ever tried before.

The biggest group is comprised of FE newcomers or enthusiasts, who generally deny that Godzilla is vigilant and extremely talented and resourceful, and some deny that he is even alive. They are the Level 6 and 7 people:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level6

who are FE tinkerers, those trying to raise money, approaching the big institutions, and so on. Also, many enthusiasts are here, where they constantly come up with “bright ideas” of how to make FE happen, but they are always variations of the same naïve approaches that have been tried literally thousands of times. They have yet to really get any experience in the field. They often have jobs in the corporate world, academia, and the like. Not many of them are really in my target audience, as they are stuck there by their inexperienced perspectives. I don’t spend much time with them, but am often approached by people in those levels. They won’t begin to understand until they get out on the playing field, and by that I mean developing disruptive technology for the market, and if they have actually gone to market, then they begin to reach high levels of understanding. If people play those games, they will get some idea of how it works, if they survive the process.

I have no interest in engaging those in Levels 2, 3, 4, 8, or 9. I have never seen one of them get unstuck. They are usually stuck due to reaching the limits of their integrity, settling for some false but comforting view of how the world works, or surrendering to evil, or thinking it can be fought and defeated, and so on.

I don’t spend much time with Level 5s, as they are stuck in debilitating fear and do not want to relinquish that state, as they again find some comfort from it, even if it is the devil they know. My essay will show how shaky their “certainty” about the dangers of FE is. They do not even get to the stage of acknowledging FE’s possibility and potential before going into spasms of fear, and I have seen it with Level 3s, where they attack the idea of FE from several angles, including “it is impossible!” to dismissing evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory” to saying that humanity would either strip mine the planet or engage in World War III if FE was used by the public. It is quite a spectacle to witness that kind of reaction, and supposedly from smart people. Peak Oilers can be like that.

I also hear from people who have been scorched by the “bad guys,” and they warn me of the dangers, as if I did not know of them. I had my life wrecked by them, many fellow travelers and colleagues had premature and sometimes violent deaths, and many that survived such activities have told me their tales of woe, and I have heard many other tales. Brian O was just one of many who got smacked for putting his nose into areas that are “off limits” to people like him:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

I am well aware of what can happen, and I know that I am risking my life, although few around me have the faintest understanding that I am. But I am trying to play at a level that does not attract organized suppression, and trying to play at a level where the effort will be relatively safe from the tactics I have seen or heard of. Again, self-seeking is the quickest path to failure in this realm, and those who immediately ask how they can make money doing this, or how they need money to be involved, are either weak links or outright provocateurs.

I am probably seeking to interact with Level 0s most of all; people who have never heard of FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level01

and the next group is probably Level 10s. I was in several Level 10 efforts myself, with Dennis and Brian. If anybody has played the Level 10 game for long, I might be able to reach them, and they can see the futility of that approach. I have yet to see a Level 10 effort that was not easily defeated, largely because the people in it did not have the proper motivation. They were either trying to make a living or get rich (or had nationalistic goals, etc.), held a victim’s orientation toward the suppressors, or even denied that they existed or were vigilant (which is shades of Level 6, and those two levels tend to overlap, and Level 7 also tends to overlap with Level 10).

Again, the people I will be looking for will have their hearts in the right place, first of all. The next most important qualification is that they had some kind of experience that exposed at least one of the dominant ideologies to them:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

It is generally not good enough to have seen them exposed from afar, but it is best to have been in the belly of the beast, so to speak, where they were subjected to the conditioning, to later wake up to the lies that support the ideology. Something like what Dennis discovered about American nationalism:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#voice

Brian with materialism:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#remote

Ralph McGehee with nationalism:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#saigon

my experience with exposing materialism:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#silva

or my profession:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#believing

and the like, are what I mean. Once one is seen through, then the others are easier to see through. They need to be seen through because until people do, they think that the institutions of those ideologies hold some promise for making FE happen, when the opposite is the truth. Even then, I carried Dennis’s and Brian’s spears as they approached the DOE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#yull

http://www.brianoleary.info/Impacts.html

and while I was doing it, I wondered what they thought we would accomplish. Also, understanding those ideologies kind of “inoculates” people against trying those tactics that have never come close to working before. At least they will usually refrain from dragging what I am doing into their framework, and they will begin to understand that I am doing something different.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
22nd April 2014, 03:48
Hi:

I was made aware of this a few minutes ago:

http://pesn.com/2014/04/20/9602473_Mehran-Tavakoli-Keshe_Announces_He-is-Messiah/

Keshe is not the only FE aspirant who thinks that he is the messiah:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#grandeur

The others are usually a bit more quiet and modest about it. I see Keshe’s announcement as another cautionary tale regarding the FE issue. As I have mentioned before, I had fleeting delusions of becoming the USA’s president back in 1987, and I was quickly humbled by my journey:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#chasing

If Keshe was really the messiah, he would know that FE and antigravity technologies are older than he is. He is my age.

FE and related issues are as immense as they get and easily seduce people’s egos. Dennis himself is a fanatical Christian, although he never thought that he was the messiah, but the messianic journey has plenty in common with manifesting the human journey‘s biggest event. It is one of many pitfalls attending the pursuit of FE. I don’t have a level of the FE onion for those kinds of delusions, but they could arguably fit into Level 11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level11

but probably without the capitalist payoff, but the religious one. Again, almost nobody has a balanced and enlightened reaction to the idea of FE. Almost everybody is in denial, but for the very few who get past that, many pitfalls beckon, and Godzilla’s antics are actually a minor aspect of them. FE aspirants do not get Godzilla’s attention until they have progressed pretty far. Dennis had to survive his “allies,” the Mafia, and the local electric interests before Godzilla took much interest in his efforts, and every American president since Reagan knows who Dennis is, but they are down the food chain a ways.

What Keshe is doing is exactly why I am taking it slow and steady, with a very specific intention and strategy. It is so easy to fly off into realms of delusion, fixate on minor aspects, fail to understand the big picture, and so on. When FE newbies begin comprehending the issue’s magnitude, it is “normal” to get bit with the bug that Keshe has, although it usually is at a far more modest level, where newbies “only” want to become the next Bill Gates, become the world government's chief executive (the USA’s presidency is aiming low :) ), or merely get rich and famous, drown in babes, etc.

As I have been writing recently, some casualties in the energy milieu are people such as Ruppert:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=823147&viewfull=1#post823147

whose addiction to scarcity ended his life. Austerity advocates are not a fun bunch to hang around. But the pursuit of FE is no easy task either, and for all the dead inventors:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#deadinventors

by far the greatest number of casualties are those who had their lives wrecked in the FE pursuit, and Godzilla had very little to do with that. A great deal was just what most inventors go through. Inventors almost never profit from their inventions, as they lose the rights to them, they are stolen, etc. But the field is also littered with inventors who poured their life’s savings into pursuing FE, and they never reached the stage where they had anything worth suppressing (that is the fate of the vast majority of FE inventors). But that was often enough due to the activities of their “allies.”

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

David Hughes
22nd April 2014, 04:16
Joe Newman was another one with the technology that thought he was the messiah:

nSgutzwP75c

.....and just because :)

plZRe1kPWZw

Wade Frazier
22nd April 2014, 04:46
Hi David:

Yes, Joe is one of the casualties. But I have to give him credit; I first heard about FE through his work in 1986, when Dennis tried to keep the dying Seattle company alive by joining with Joe. Joe would not have any of it, and we were out of business a couple of months later:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#hired

A decade later, Joe attacked Dennis, saying that Dennis was stealing his work, which was laughable. Joe really went off the deep end, which is a standard hazard in this realm. Dennis tried to ignore Joe, and I think he even tried to help Joe, realizing that he was mentally ill. Joe’s journey is another cautionary tale. In that video that you posted, you can see Joe running straight into the pitfall of trying to patent his device. If he had any idea what FE really meant, he would not have tried to patent it. And applying for patents guarantees defeat, whether it is stonewalling by the patent office, the military seizing the patent after it is granted via national security laws, or the many other ways that they get taken out. If an inventor applies for a patent, it is already over, although he does not know it yet. The entire business/capitalist path is a dead end, and applying for a patent announces that you are doing it for the money, and that is the easiest approach for Godzilla to defeat. When Godzilla sees an inventor apply for a patent, he yawns and sends a flunky to take care of it, but he really does not have to do much, as the system is designed to produce the desired result, without him needing to micromanage it.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
22nd April 2014, 09:22
Sad really, If the claims about Keshe's 'over self esteem' are true, even though not so surprising as Wade often details the various variables, 'causes and effect' when it comes to the inventor's path pursuing FE, and ego seems to be one of the easiest ones to handle. People are being played with by their weaknesses, and sometimes also by their virtues.

I think that the Keshe's foundation approach desrved an eyebrowse being raised from the beginning when it included an appeal to the government, as can be seen in this 2012 quote-


"Let us move to the next step, but please work with your government as their scientists make decisions according to their old understanding and now it is time to play the new game of openness with science and for you to show to your governments your working prototype with the help of others around the world"

This approach points on either a complete misunderstanding of the supression and opression which is evidently directed by those same institutions, either by a type of of innocence to think that it can be overcome, or by the messaiah complex to think the same thing. That is even before all the other 'party crashers' like having a working prototype in actuality that can be developed and duplicated, having the proper funds which sums in many millions or registering a patent which is a pure 'service to self' act that between else riches one person and prevent others from using the same advancment. A kind of a narrow approach.

Despite his erroneous judgment on Dennis Lee, Dr Peter Lindemann's specific summarising of this one problematic point may be fitting here (From an article published in 2001, I hope you don't mind, Wade) -


" The idea of free energy taps very deeply into the human subconscious mind. A few inventors with marginal technologies that demonstrate useful anomalies have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of their inventions. Some of these inventors also have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of THEMSELVES for having invented it. A combination of "gold fever" and/or a "messiah complex" appears, wholly distorting any future contribution they may make. While the research thread they are following may hold great promise, they begin to trade enthusiasm for facts, and the value of the scientific work from that point on suffers greatly. There is a powerful, yet subtle seduction that can warp a personality if they believe that "the world rests on their shoulders" or that they are the world's "savior." Strange things also happen to people when they think they are about to become extremely rich. It takes a tremendous spiritual discipline to remain objective and humble in the presence of a working free energy machine"
http://www.rense.com/general12/status.htm

But it is sad to see these attempts tackle and fall on their own swords. Free energy is a blessing beyond belief to our planet, it will help us grow in more ways than our imagination can think of, and this place and it's people so very much need it right now, I pray with all my heart for consciousness to spread far and wide and the knowledge of FE will be known and respected for what it is. Together with consciousness it is everything.
Prayers do have a prayer, yes?

Blessings ~

Limor

Melinda
22nd April 2014, 12:33
Hi Wade,

I’ll try and keep this brief.


...http://pesn.com/2014/04/20/9602473_Mehran-Tavakoli-Keshe_Announces_He-is-Messiah/

Keshe is not the only FE aspirant who thinks that he is the messiah...

I came across Allan’s article a couple of days ago, and one of the first things I thought of was this thread, and why you are taking the slow and comprehensive approach that you are.

Whilst there is some room for interpreting language and spiritual intent (as Allan touches upon), Keshe’s choice of words rings certain alarm bells.

In the audio recording of a workshop Allan links to, Keshe can be heard saying the following:


“...This is my, my wish and my way of doing things, and I’m not ashamed or afraid of any people, any in the world leader, or any religious leader, who tries to attack me. I have created you and at my wish I can end your life. You wished and for years you asked for messiah. Here I am, standing in front of you. I’m ashamed of my own creation, the human race, and I’ve said that for years to my family and my wife...”

Whether channelled or not, once an FE scientist starts making claims about having created the human race, and his ability to end others’ lives at his ‘wish,’ it is dangerous territory.

I understand the possibility that there may be technology in existence which can be used to trigger a messiah complex in someone who is deemed a threat. It could be far more damaging to undermine someone’s sanity and stability, than to assassinate them. But it is equally possible that due to the extraordinary stress and pressures facing FE scientists, they could develop these perceptions entirely by themselves.

Whatever the case, with any of them, it would seem yet again to validate the approach you are taking in forming a choir which develops a comprehensive understanding. With the support / attention of thousands who have raised their consciousness with a steady, grounded and in-depth understanding of FE, any scientists have a far greater chance of remaining grounded.


Free energy is a blessing beyond belief to our planet, it will help us grow in more ways than our imagination can think of, and this place and it's people so very much need it right now, I pray with all my heart for consciousness to spread far and wide and the knowledge of FE will be known and respected for what it is. Together with consciousness it is everything.

Thank you for that Limor.

Wade Frazier
22nd April 2014, 13:24
Hi Limor:

I have never publicly named Dennis’s libelers before:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#libel

but yes, what that libeler (I would not call his writings "erroneous," but consciously dishonest - there is a big difference between the two) described about the messiah complex was accurate, and that, combined with a gold rush mentality, has taken out many FE inventors, as they fell on their swords before Godzilla even needed to lift a claw. But that libeler’s attack on Dennis turned his essay into disinformation. All disinformation has truth in it. That is what makes it plausible. For that writer to exhort us to be humble and devoted to the truth and making the world a better place, and then committing libel against the greatest figure in the field (Dennis is the only person I know of who meets these qualifications http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany), is typical of the kinds of low integrity actions that plague the FE field:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

which is a big reason why I really do not want to have much to do with the field. As I recently wrote, I am looking to mostly connect with people who have never heard of FE before. The field is too damaged, by gold rushing inventors who think they are the messiah, by disinformation specialists such as Mr. Skeptic:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#libel

who are then embraced or tolerated by naïve “leaders” in the field:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/skeptic.htm

and so on. Almost nobody in the field today has the right stuff, and Keshe’s latest pronouncement is only one more example of the hazards of making FE happen. All of those inventors that fell on their swords, for one reason or another, highlight an important dynamic for why we do not have FE today. That libel tract keeps getting promoted by newbies to the field, and I keep getting handed it as an example of “great” writing on the issue. :)

Yes, prayers can help, and many times I just pray for a miracle, because humanity seems incapable of really helping itself, as we all ride on the fast train to oblivion. I keenly understand the pressure of wanting to “do something,” and that is one reason why you see so many half-cocked FE efforts out there, particularly the tinkerer approach to FE. At least the idea of open sourcing and doing FE via non-profit efforts is becoming more prominent. Those are at least baby steps of progress, but newbies rarely have much perspective regarding the promise, the perils, what it takes to make it happen, and what has failed thousands of times.

Even if what I am attempting does not help very much for taking it over the top, it attempts to help people arrive at a more mature, comprehensive perspective of the issue. That was always missing from the attempts I saw, from not only the inventors/promoters and their supporters, but from their audience. More people have to understand how the world really works. Yes, exhorting people to work with their governments is exactly the kind of thing that newbies do. We are not going to get there via naïveté. But as I wrote earlier:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825516&viewfull=1#post825516

and have many times before, even Brian and Dennis approached the DOE. Both started out as flag-waving Boy Scouts, never quite got all the Kool-Aid out of their mouths, to eventually be run out of their home nation. All I “want” from my government is to not be murdered or have my life wrecked anymore, and the like, but I might be asking for too much. :) Unfortunately, that “work with your government” approach is extremely common. I see it all the time with newbie efforts. Or looking for “philanthropists,” etc. Again, I am not sure if what I am seeing helps more than hurts. It certainly creates a three-ring circus of distraction and chatter.

Hi Melinda:

I saw your post just before I published this, and I’ll say that people like Keshe probably have not arrived at the point where Godzilla needs to do anything. Here are most of the points of intervention that I am aware of:



1. When you are putting disruptive energy technology on the market (they stop messing around if you somehow get to that highest level of the game (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run));

2. When you are getting close to publicly demonstrating a working FE prototype, the kind that can be robustly tested and there is no doubt of its validity (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet and Adam’s stuff);

3. When you have astronauts testifying before Congress on the UFOs they saw (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#adamiak);

4. When you mount a public effort that might really help raise awareness (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#portland);

5. When you mount an effort that can develop disruptive energy technologies for market, and you have a track record of success (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#mr).


There are also intervention levels below that, such as kids inventing FE prototypes in nuclear labs:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=811647&highlight=comings#post811647

but I doubt that Godzilla was involved with that; it was more likely the national security state. Again, Godzilla sits above all governments and corporations.

For those just writing, like I am, disinformation specialists may dog their steps (http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/02/353778.shtml#251272), but I have not seen them get violent with writers yet, at least in the West.

While Keshe may have been zapped (like Greer has been, like we probably were during the NEM days, and maybe even in Ventura), people like him usually do not need that kind of “help.” Keshe has almost always been just big talk, and that does not threaten Godzilla and friends, and when they see stuff like “work with your government,” they know that that particular effort will not be a threat, but it is already defeated. When people like Keshe make those kinds of statements, part of me wonders if they are on the payroll; stranger things have happened.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
22nd April 2014, 20:01
Hi Wade,

You started your last post with Dennis Lee and finished with Keshe. Both are inventors. Both declared of their desire to distribute Free Energy to the world for the benefit of humanity and took some (more than) measurable steps (each in their own very separate and individual way). Both are also marketing and sales people who know their craft... (This is not a comparison between the two, only relating to minor similarities as appear to the 'unsuspecting' outside observer)

I'll take the risk here to write my thoughts. With regards to "erroneous" and 'consciously dishonest', I understand the difference between the two, the first one is obviously doing no justice. I assume 'Erroneous' is quite a subtle wording for what it was. Because of the relatively easiness to ruin someone's name or continue a smear campaign that began somewhere else, there should be a greater responsibility for passing a judgment on someone, sentencing without being aware to all the facts of all sides of the matter or simply insinuating. This may require a broader ability to see as well as be able to detect the 'signs', these signs are the ones you gathered during your convoluted journey and possibly the reason that you do all you can to pass them on to your audience and request them from you choire, an ability to differentiate, to get the facts right. To get the person right. A lack of proper diagnosis is a problem, both ways, for the better and for the worse (when buying into the non-existant and in opposite eliminating the existing). Non- differentiating or inaccuracy is a way to complete Godzila's work for him and assist him with his mission, boy, he has all of us as quiet helpers everywhere. Not for nothing the saying goes that the wardens are also the prisoners. In Dennis's Lee case, go and prove that you do not have a sister.. In Keshe's you are not requested to prove that, everyone is convinced that you have. So it's all these small and big signs and observations when it comes to FE, as is on other areas of our life.
Making this wrong and it's running after our tails. By laying your hard gained experiences and observations, Wade, and repeating them again and again you are allowing us to widen the tools of distinction. Some inventors lives were wrecked, not everyone has a cat's nine souls like Dennis Lee seems to have.
Maybe you are right and talking about it as well as understanding the in depth and role of energy in our life (provided that we have time left, a lot of things are happening right now) will help with spreading of the word and that may continue forward, even to a society that believes with all it's heart that there is no 'free lunch'

I hope that some of it makes sense, not quite sure where it comes from

All the best,

Limor

Wade Frazier
22nd April 2014, 21:28
Hi Limor:

I was already going to do it, but your post on one of Dennis’s libelers seems to have spurred today’s task, which is updating my “my adventures” essay for the first time since 2008:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm

I have spent today copying numerous documents relating to what happened during my journey with Dennis. The documents are mostly from Dennis’s books. Dennis has never hidden his past, but his libelers lie and say that he does:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#attack2006

Yes, discernment is critical, and I rarely see anybody exercise it in these areas. I have watched the very same prominent members in the FE field embrace Mr. Skeptic and that libeler while they attacked Dennis and Brian. What is wrong with that picture? Bizarre behavior like that is why I don’t have much to do with the FE field today. Attacking the saints, befriending the scoundrels, claiming that one is the messiah, billion dollar offers to go away, jail and worse when they are rejected, etc., is terrain that almost nobody seems to be able to successfully navigate. But the choir will need to become familiar with it, if only to know what the pitfalls are.

I have written about when the affable psychopaths arrive and how almost everybody falls under their spell. I know that most people do not have what it takes to not be sucked in. It is one of many reasons why meeting in the flesh in conferences and the like does not work for FE, not now. Not only are such events crawling with Godzilla’s agents and others pursuing unsavory agendas, but New Agey types, scientists and the like are easily gulled. Those in the effort I plan to mount have to be much worldlier than what I have seen in the FE field and elsewhere. Naïveté and gullibility can be fatal in this field, and a protected forum in cyberspace is one of my lines of defense from the psychopaths of various persuasions, including those on Godzilla’s payroll.

Hey, maybe Keshe really is the messiah. :) But if he is, he should know that he is far from the first FE theorist to make that claim; it is an occupational hazard. By his fruits he will be known. As Melinda wrote, plenty of red flags come up with Keshe’s talk, and I am actually sympathetic to the rigors behind him and Joe Newman taking up the messiah’s mantle. I have been on that playing field and I know the seductions, temptations, hazards, and why people make grandiose claims. FE in the public’s hands would be the biggest event in human history, and many have fallen by the wayside for numerous reasons. It is not easy terrain, by any means, and the battlefield is littered with casualties.

Since 2001, I have tried to make lemonade out of the lemon of that libelous article. When I have seen FE newbies promote that article, some of whom are pretty famous, even after they heard from me, it told me all that I needed to know about them. I see people promoting that article like people promoting Mein Kampf, for instance, because Hitler made some astute observations in it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#hitler

There are often nuggets found among the rubbish. Those who can’t distinguish the wheat from the chaff have no business being in the FE pursuit. The stakes are insanely high, and almost all of the “battle” takes place out of the public’s eye, and even what comes into view is buried in an avalanche of disinformation, suppression activities, etc.

I am not sure if that addressed your post, and let me know if it does not.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 16:36
Hi:

OK, I finished that revision of my “my adventures” essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm

and added a bunch of documents.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 17:57
Hi:

I just can’t help myself, and need to comment more on Keshe’s messianic pronouncement. Maybe the process of revising my “my adventures” essay in the past day:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm

brought this on, as I had to relive many events. I have written plenty that I respect what may have well been manifestations of the transcendental and infinite spirits:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#transcendental

But as I have written in my upcoming essay, what has passed down to today through the various priesthoods are likely caricatures, at best, of those men, and are likely liberally sprinkled with fairy tales. Dennis is a fanatical Christian, and I saw the mixed blessing that that could be. The USA is filled with religious fanatics, and there were times during my journey when the extreme hardships of our journey could color our thinking. But when FE aspirants begin thinking in messianic terms, it is an opening for megalomania to take root. If there really is anything like a messiah, I doubt that they need to announce themselves. Talk is oh-so-cheap. Only by their actions will they prove who they are, not their talk.

The traps for the ego regarding the FE pursuit are numerous, and I have seen so many casualties. Anybody who has been on this path for long gets humbled, whether it is going bankrupt, losing careers, friends, family, and the like. Dennis got body-cavity searches while in prison, among the many other indignities. He admitted that all of those adventures made him a better person, but he is the greatest lemonade maker on Earth.

Because of the magnitude of the FE issue, both for its potential to make this heaven on Earth, and for also avoiding hell on Earth, very few people have been able to maintain the focus needed to move FE forward, with most falling to the many ego-traps that await. Sure, the masses are oblivious, sure Godzilla exists and is vigilant, sure the greatest enemies that FE aspirants face are their “allies”; that just comes with the territory. But we are all just upright apes, and if any of us finds our internal divinity, the only way to spread that “good news” is by just being that divine being, and no announcements are necessary.

When FE really appears, it will not need to promote itself.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
23rd April 2014, 18:06
Hi Wade,

Is good that you point this out :).

I have to confess I've harbored some messianic type thoughts myself for a while and I am still tempted from time to time. Luckily for me I did not make this public.

When I look around and notice that almost nobody is home when it comes to Free Energy (or how everything is about energy) it makes me think that I am somehow special and so it's my job to save and enlighten those that did not get it yet! (Only to realize that I am still "getting it" myself and that my ego is pulling the strings)

In a sense I understand why Keshe sees himself as a kind of super savior.

All in all, another lesson learned! (I hope :becky:)

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 18:31
Hi Ilie:

That ego temptation just comes with the territory, and it is very good work to try to come to terms with it early on, as the temptations only become greater the further you progress (and men are particularly susceptible to it, for various reasons). I have seen many reactions to those temptations. Also, the most extreme manifestations of that megalomaniacal tendency usually happen after an aspirant has run into resistance of some kind, whether it is ridicule, ostracism, attacks, and other slings and arrows that come from those around them, the indifference of the masses, or organized suppression, from local energy interests all the way to Godzilla’s level. Keshe got a little mild suppression some years ago, and I have seen that kind of suffering send people off the deep end. Pathological states like those usually have something “real” that triggered them.

A healthy way to mount an FE effort is to call it a “No-Messiah Zone.” :)

My upcoming essay is intended to impart numerous perspectives to my readers, but one of the most important, at least to me, is getting my readers to understand why the public will begin to wake up with almost nothing less than FE becoming a public event, from being able to see one really working (again, not the proof-of-concept demos, not blueprints that tinkerers can try to build a prototype from, not stories from people like me and Dennis), to having one delivered to their home where they can unhook from the grid.

Scarcity is baked extremely deeply, and people are not going to begin to relinquish it until practical abundance is delivered to them. That is really, at its root, why Level 10 efforts have not had a chance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

because all Level 10 strategies use some variation of scarcity (beseeching the rich and powerful, appealing to self-interest (especially greed, but also megalomaniacal tendencies), and Godzilla is the master of scarcity, and any effort that comes from a scarcity mindset is easily defeated.

Again, the Internet and the kinds of trends it has inspired, such as open-sourcing, crowd-funding, and the like, are baby steps in the right direction to making FE happen.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
23rd April 2014, 20:20
Beginning to read Wade's "First epochal event: Growing our Brains and Controlling Fire", and the thoughts are already roaming

Why couldn't we just be animals? Primate. They don't have a messiah complex, they never knew Jesus and if they would, idolatry would not be a part of their lexicon. they don't feel the need to go to church, have a confession, when they die they don't care whether they are buried or not. They can fight over a female but very rarely kill their own species, they don't feel the need to get themselves dressed or pretend to be something else other than who they are, when they eat they don't put their hands in their pockets to give something in return, they deliver their news succinctly and without manipulation or exaggeration ,they know how to live in a group without any desire to change it, their social engagment does not include cell phones, and they give and take energy more or less in equal measure, and we are the ones considered to be with consciousness...?

But there may be one thing that will allow us this great advantage and maybe it will be our chance to finally contribute something worthwhile to this world. maybe this is why we started this race to the evolution trophy in the first place, and just maybe Free Energy is the talked about and longed for holy grail. I think it may serve a great karmic debt and settle us within a new environment and some new challanges to explore on a much more far and wide cosmic level. There is no worthier cause to pursue. And it's for real ~

--------------------------------


Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "getting my readers to understand why the public will begin to wake up with almost nothing less than FE becoming a public event"

It may be that the public first needs to wake up to the problem of this reality before the solution is offered, This is usually the order of things.
Maybe Noam Chomsky's latest declaration will help speed up the process

http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-is-running-the-worlds-largest-terrorist-operation/5339835


Blessings ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 20:43
Hi Limor:

Yes, big subjects, but each Epochal Event so far was initiated by a small group of people who learned how to tap the new energy resource. Only after it was tapped did the transformation begin, and what was previously unimaginable came to pass. I think that FE will be the same. That is where I think that virtually all theorists and activists have missed the boat, even somebody as awesome as Chomsky. The problem is scarcity, and terror operations are always about economics at their root.

Fuller said it well, I think, in that political systems are pretty meaningless for solving our fundamental problems:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#politics

Fuller sought to reduce scarcity by ephemeralization, at least until he saw Adam’s gizmo at work.

On the animal part, we are playing the ensouled species game, and that one ain’t easy. :)

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
23rd April 2014, 20:58
ephemeralization = The ability of technological advancement to do "more and more with less and less until eventually you can do everything with nothing", a term coined by R. Buckminster Fuller.

EROI 0 :)

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 21:35
Hi Limor:

Let’s see Bucky not eat. :) Oops! He no longer needs to. However, for the rest of us...

Bucky’s vision of doing more with less was related to technological advances that reduced resources (ultimately energy) used. His famous example was satellites replacing transoceanic cables. However, it took a lot of energy to get that satellite into orbit, and was a vastly more sophisticated energy trick than laying cable. There is always something to learn from Bucky, but aspects of his work are dated, and when he saw Adam’s FE machine at work, he saw the future.

Ephemeralization could be called working smart instead of hard, but recent studies on technology and energy shows that energy is critical for technology. The more advanced the material, the more energy goes into producing it. For all the advances of the Internet that are allowing us to have this exchange, local companies (local to me) such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon put their server farms next to hydroelectric dams and other cheap electricity sources. It is always about energy.

Even back when I wrote my 2002 site, I stated that the rise of humanity was dependent on manipulative ability, intelligence, and energy:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#rise

My upcoming essay can be seen as merely going deep on those issues.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
23rd April 2014, 22:51
Thank you, Wade. There's a lot to learn. One of the problems if you are a not knowledgeable and non-oriented (not you!) on the scientific technical side of producing energy mechanically, is the distinction between maximum efficiency of a device and a complete free circulation. With honesty, I do not personally know whether in your days with Dennis Lee he produced this or that, and I was/am too embarassed to ask :pray: I am aware to the video's with the big panels (efficiency)

Physical and scientific illiteracy is ain't no pretty

Also learning from your slip of a toungue : )

Wade Frazier
23rd April 2014, 23:33
Hi Limor:

Your posts are timely. I’ll put up what I have written since I posted my last essay excerpt. There are several important energy concepts to understand. On Dennis, briefly, he sold the world’s most efficient heat pump:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#new

It is really not too hard to understand how it worked and why it was so efficient (huge surface area contact with the environment, primarily). My first professional mentor invented the world’s best engine for powering a car:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#glimpse

and again, it is not too difficult to understand why it was so superior. Whether those two could be married and make “free energy” is still an open question for me, but call me skeptical. However, when you get wiped out before you get very far along, questions remain questions.

However, that stuff pales beside tapping the ZPF like Sparky Sweet did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

That is the big show, and it should really be easy to understand, at least conceptually. Empty space is not really empty, and calculations by big names such as Bohm estimated that there is more potential energy in your fingertip than mainstream scientists have calculated is in the entire universe. Some have made more modest calculations, but the point is that there is an energy source there, if we know how to tap it. It was tapped long ago, technologically, and Level 19s can tap it with their consciousness:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level19

But while we keep our hearts and minds focused on scarcity and survival, Godzilla has his dark game well in hand. There is no other issue on Earth that approaches its magnitude in the slightest. Virtually everything else is meaningless, but almost nobody is even aware of the most important issue on Earth, and that is bizarre. Brian O tried to play Paul Revere on the issue, and years later he wondered if humanity was really a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

and I sadly understood his query.

In recent days, I was distracted by hosting an Easter gathering for my family and other fun, but below is what I wrote since my last excerpt, and I am almost to what I think will be my favorite chapter to write: what a world based on FE and abundance can look like. I have done it plenty of times before, but this will be the one that probably best represents my work.

Best,

Wade

Several energy concepts are important for understanding the health and trajectory of economies, and some key ones are:

1. The total energy available for exploitation;
2. How efficiently that energy can be recovered (EROI);
3. How efficiently that recovered energy can be transported to where it is used (transmission losses);
4. How efficiently that energy can be converted into work and other useful forms (how much is lost to entropy);
5. The amount of energy that can be converted into work per unit of time (power).

For the first concept presented above, for conventional renewable energy sources, they are replenished by sunlight or radiation from Earth’s interior; one is fusion, and the other is fission. For so-called non-renewable energy sources, such as hydrocarbons and fissile materials, they are either renewed on timescales so vast that they are effectively non-renewable for humans (such as hydrocarbons), or are “renewed” by the fusion processes in stars (fissile materials), so could only be renewed with new planetary formation. In mainstream thought, the currently non-renewable energy resources are primarily hydrocarbons (petroleum, coal, and natural gas) and uranium. Much of the peak oil debate centers around the definition of oil. What has been called oil for the past 150 years is today called conventional oil. It is the oil formed by the previously described geological processes, and can be mined by drilling wells and extracting it with the conventional methods that have been used since the beginning, with new techniques periodically invented to increase the rate and total extraction. For conventional oil, humanity has unearthed about 1.1 trillion barrels since 1859, with about 1.2 trillion remaining. Production of conventional oil peaked in 2006 at 25 billion barrels per year, and has declined since then. At current production rates, conventional oil will be completely depleted in less than fifty years. About another five billion barrels per year are called unconventional oil, which is called heavy oil, extra heavy oil, and oil sands. Those unconventional oils comprise trillions more barrels, and total about 70% of Earth’s oil reserves and arguably more. For fissile materials, primarily uranium, the peak may have already been reached, or it might be a few decades into the future. For natural gas the situation is similar, in that the peak may have already been reached, or it is only a few decades into the future at most. For coal, peak extraction may also be only a few decades in the future. Peak extraction usually occurs when about half of the recoverable energy resource has been mined. In summary, the energy resources that have powered the Industrial Revolution are all on their way to largely vanishing in this century. The only resources with seeming viability past this century are coal and unconventional oil, which brings us to the second concept, EROI.

EROI is the key concept to describe any economy. When 90% of a population devoted its effort to procuring food, virtually all human effort went into acquiring energy, and little surplus energy existed to fund professions and the elite. In those early societies, their societal EROI was about 1.1. If all of a person’s effort goes into procuring food, his/her EROI is one, where it takes all of his/her energy to obtain his/her energy. If one person can provide the food for two, then his/her personal EROI is two. The EROI concept is used for various energy situations. The ancient Roman EROI for wheat and alfalfa cultivation has been estimated at 12 and 27, respectively. That reduction in agricultural workforce in industrializing England reflected a rising EROI for food production, which came from mechanization and more efficient methods. A concept for helping to understand EROI is return on financial investment, but return on financial investment only mimics the real world, and is not real in of itself. Money and finances are only accounting abstractions and are only meaningful if they reflect the real world, but they often do not. When American whaling ships were sailing around the world in search of whales, it reflected a plummeting EROI. Whales took more energy to find, they became smaller as the biggest ones were targeted first, and the like. Only because European sailing technology turned the world’s oceans into low-energy transportation lanes could whaling like that be feasible, but declining EROI also reflected declining absolute energy that could be exploited. As Gravettians drove mammoths to extinction, their mammoth EROI declined, as well as the amount of energy that could be exploited. When both sank far enough, that first “civilization” would have collapsed and they moved in search of easier meat, for those who survived the “mammoth famine.”

That decline in whaling EROI and the gross amount of exploitable whale oil set the stage for exploiting a new energy source, and the rise of oil then happened. Oil’s EROI and total exploitable energy made whales insignificant by comparison. In the 1930s, the EROI for East Texas oil wells was more than a hundred. Those days of easy oil are long gone. The global EROI of oil and gas production has fallen from about 30 in 1990 to less than 20 in 2014, and it may decline to 10 by 2020. That means increasing amounts of energy are expended to extract the energy. Reports of increasing global gross energy extraction are misleading, as the more important measure is net energy acquired. At an EROI of two, half the energy acquired is used for extracting it. At a gross 100 barrels of oil extracted at an EROI of 100, 99 barrels are available for societal use. At a gross 100 barrels of oil and an EROI of two, only 50 barrels are available. Only about a third of an oilfield’s deposit is recoverable. Once a third of the oil is extracted, the energy surplus quickly falls to zero, where it takes more energy to extract the oil than is acquired, or stated another way, the EROI falls to one.

Leaders in developing the concept of EROI believe that an EROI of at least five, and closer to ten, is needed to run a modern civilization. The shale oil and tar sands that were touted in the first decade of the 21st century have EROIs of less than five and as low as two, and similarly promoted biofuels have an EROI of about one. Exploiting inferior energy sources is a classic resource depletion scenario that has played out numerous times during the human journey, as each energy resource was plundered to exhaustion, where it was terrestrial megafauna, forests, soils, or whales. Industrial civilization is fast approaching the level where it cannot energetically sustain itself.

Once the energy is delivered into a gas tank or turbine boiler, the efficiency of turning that chemical energy into mechanical energy is what Carnot first dealt with. Also, the concept of power is critical. How quickly energy can be released and used is the crux of how rockets work, for instance. To get more power, more sophisticated technology was required, from taller masts in sailing ships to stronger components for watermills to high-performance engines (which run hotter with greater pressures). Generating more power was always a technological feat but was dependent on how much energy could be delivered and how quickly.

Those energy concepts are the real ones that all economies face, and financial measures only reflect them. In the USA, just as M. King Hubbert predicted, peak oil was reached in 1970. In 1973, the first oil crisis hit, and real wages per hour peaked the same year and have declined since then. Wages were only a reflection of energy consumption, which also peaked in the 1970s for the USA and have since declined by nearly the same proportion that real wages per hour have. The USA’s declining standard of living since the 1970s was minor compared to the devastation inflicted on developing nations. The beginning of the end of Yugoslavia was initiated by the oil prices shocks of the 1970s. Many nations have yet to recover. When the oil price shocks hit, Structural Adjustment Programs and other measures were inflicted by Western institutions on developing nations. As people such as John Perkins eventually admitted, those policies were intentionally used to enslave those nations. On the world stage, the self-image promoted by the West is that of blundering do-gooders. As people such as Noam Chomsky have clearly pointed out many times, it is a false narrative designed to hide corrupt motivation from the outset. It is simply more of that fake philanthropy. I have written a great deal elsewhere on how corrupt the global media is, how the history taught imperial citizens resembles fairy tales, how professions and industries have largely degenerated into rackets, how the USA’s genocidal invasions, just like all genocidal invasions, were always economically motivated, usually to secure energy resources. This essay does not need to belabor those trends, but anybody not blinded by their ideologies of choice can clearly see that the game being played on the global stage is the same one that has always been played: economically exploiting others. Because industrialized civilization is beginning to run out of the energy sources that the West used to industrialize, a universal decline in humanity’s standard of living is happening. The USA has transitioned from the land of opportunity to a deindustrializing economy where the bankers and other capitalists are blowing serial bubbles designed to rob one class in favor of another. The zero-sum-game aspect of those machinations are painfully obvious.

Melinda
24th April 2014, 00:49
...I am almost to what I think will be my favorite chapter to write: what a world based on FE and abundance can look like. I have done it plenty of times before, but this will be the one that probably best represents my work...

Looking forward to that one.

Wade Frazier
24th April 2014, 03:42
Hi Melinda:

I am also looking forward to it to, and just now decided to cut to the chase.

I just wrote this to finish off that chapter for now:

The mind-control techniques that Orwell and Huxley wrote about have been turned into sciences, and there are even “competitions” between their dystopian visions, seeing which one will predominate.

Meanwhile, Spaceship Earth is crashing. As I performed my studies since 1990, including numerous scientific topics, one issue became clear: biologists and climate scientists are horrified by what is happening. Biologists know that we are living through the Sixth Mass Extinction, which is caused by humans and is happening before their eyes. Climate scientists are watching humans alter the atmosphere to the extent that dramatic geophysical events may be caused within a geologic-timescale’s blink of an eye. It took more than two billion years for photosynthetic organisms to oxygenate Earth’s atmosphere, and the first forests may have initiated an ice age, which took many millions of years to transpire. But humans may end up altering the atmosphere so much in a mere few hundred years to actually turn Earth from an Icehouse Earth into a Hothouse Earth, create anoxic ocean and hydrogen sulfide events, or myriad other potential outcomes. Industrial humanity is engaging in a chemistry and physics experiment with our home planet, and hardly anybody seems to notice or care. That frightens climate scientists, and biologists know that those potential geophysical events can make the current extinction event even more pronounced, and humans may achieve a mass extinction that exceeds even the Permian Extinction, and do it quicker than every previous extinction event other than that dinosaur-destroying asteroid. For one of many ominous trends, the oceans are being acidified by the increasingly acidic rain, which is already threatening Arctic shellfish with extinction. Peter Ward’s Medean hypothesis is not so farfetched, as he churns out grim books in his twilight years, but humans are the current agents of destruction, not Mother Earth.

Some “race of the catastrophes” scenarios are being considered. Will peak hydrocarbons lead to a stabilization of carbon dioxide levels somewhere below 1000 PPM (which could trigger hydrogen sulfide events)? Will we be “saved” by running out of hydrocarbons? But we are already witnessing hydrocarbon-control genocides, and if World War III is fought, the smart money is putting it on fighting over the world’s dwindling oil deposits. Will we keep burning hydrocarbons for another few centuries (by relying on coal and nonconventional oil), reaching several hundred PPM carbon dioxide levels, somehow avoiding anoxic and hydrogen sulfide events and World War III, to only have the ice sheets melt, displace billions of people, precipitate global famines and other calamities, while we drive nearly all other species to extinction? Which way will it play out? Who would want to find out? Informed scientists see all of those dynamics coming into play and more, and who knows how they will manifest and interact? What everybody is certain of, however, is that they do not want to live to see them happen. People my age might get “lucky” and die before the meltdown begins. Today’s children, however, may not be so fortunate. There is a solution to all of those looming disasters, which is the subject of the next chapter. But implementing it will require an unprecedented act of integrity and sentience. The good news is that it would not take many people to do it, somewhere on the order of 0.0001% of today’s humanity.

I also revised an earlier chapter with this passage:

As readers of this essay know, Earth’s face has changed many times during its journey. From molten beginnings and being battered by planetesimals and having an atmosphere like Venus’s to the appearance of continents to life oxygenating the atmosphere to life covering those continents to swings from hothouse to icehouse conditions as atmospheric gases dramatically changed, continents moved, and vast extinctions and proliferations of life played out on land and sea. But the changes happened over timescales of millions and billions of years, not hundreds. No climate scientist will deny that carbon dioxide traps infrared radiation and warms Earth’s atmosphere. The volcanism of the Mesozoic Era vented enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to create two hundred million years of Hothouse Earth conditions and reptiles ruled Earth. Volcanism waned and carbon dioxide levels gradually declined for more than 100 million years, and by 35 million years ago they declined to less than 600 PPM and the Antarctic ice sheet began forming. Every paleoclimate study I have seen places greenhouse gas concentrations, with carbon dioxide always the dominant gas (with methane playing a sporadic role, usually accentuating the carbon dioxide with a cascading knock-on effect), as the primary determinant of global surface temperatures.

There have been other proximate causes of our current ice age, beginning with Antarctica becoming isolated at the South Pole around 40 mya, and when the land bridge formed between the Americas, the current ice age began. The current ice age is marked by growing and retreating ice sheets, and the events are triggered by Earth’s changing orientation to the Sun. There is not much debate on those dynamics causing the current ice age, with that order of events and probably even ranking in importance. I have not seen a climate scientist, or any serious scientist, convincingly challenge those basic dynamics.

The only global warming “debate” is whether proximate causes will have local and oscillating effects as Earth warms, as they already have, which is normal. I have seen no credible climate change “skepticism” that does not focus on the local and temporary variations due to proximate causes. The “debate” is almost entirely a concoction of the hydrocarbon lobby, those on its payroll, and the enabling media. Climate scientists without conflicts of interest are terrified by what is happening. We are not playing with a proximate cause, but the ultimate cause of Earth’s surface temperature. Humanity is conducting a vast experiment with the only atmosphere and biosphere that we have, the outcome of which could spell the doom for billions of people, not to mention many other species, and the catastrophe could manifest in a number of ways.


And am off to writing that fun chapter. I doubt it will take long.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
24th April 2014, 09:07
"Oil’s EROI and total exploitable energy made whales insignificant by comparison." <--- Yet another example of how higher energy availability will simple make obsolete the old paradigm. There was no need to go and arrest/hang/burn the whalers. Their practices simple became useless. :)

Wade Frazier
24th April 2014, 13:29
Hi Ilie:

Your comment is a reason why I have hopes that a choir can be built. The immensely destructive human journey has always been a quest for energy, from the first stone tools to the control of fire to the extinction of the megafauna to deforestation and metal smelting to agriculture to whaling to Europe kicking the world’s butt to the exploitation of fossil fuels and uranium to the genocide in Iraq.

Because humans have operated from the zero-sum-game assumption that has been baked into our little brains for tens of millions of years, people always justified those practices. Humans would concoct mental games to justify royalty, elites, slaves, big families, and other exploitative social situations, but they were really only irrational justifications for the economic situation.

On one hand, it can be depressing to see how humans can justify anything in the name of their self-interest, but on the other, we can see that rising standards of living have helped people develop some semblance of a conscience. I know that almost nobody today really has a conscience of any note, which I learned the hard way:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

but some exist, and I am looking for them. But I also know that there are only a few people like Dennis on Earth:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

and the organized suppression and the lack of integrity in the general population makes it to where the heroes become martyrs, so that route will not work.

After helping out Dennis and Brian, and having my life wrecked for my trouble, I finally came to a different strategy, which I call Level 12:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level12

and I do not need any heroes to make it work, but people who just have enough conscience that they can admit that they have been fed scarcity-based conditioning that controls their hearts and minds. I am going to see if I can train enough of them to recognize their conditioning and be able to let it go long enough to comprehend abundance. If enough people can only see what lies on the other side of the bars of our prison (largely a self-made prison), I think that we can help manifest it.

As I have stated repeatedly, Godzilla’s greatest triumph is making FE and abundance unimaginable. I am just trying to make it thinkable:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm

If we can help abundance manifest, then exploitative and destructive practices, such as whaling, will simply be seen as primitive, unproductive, and will be abandoned. There will also be a higher level of conscience attained. To Westerners, slavery and gladiators are seen as barbaric relics of our primitive past. If FE and abundance appears, most of how humans operate today will eventually be seen the same way.

Now, off to write that fun chapter.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
24th April 2014, 20:56
Hi:

Writing this chapter is far easier and a lot more fun. I’ll put part of it up soon, maybe today. But I am also flitting around the essay, making additions, editing, and the like. I can already tell that I will not have the time to play editor like I should before I publish it, but it will have to be good enough for a first edition.

For instance, I just wrote this paragraph and inserted it into the previous chapter:

To return to an early chapter in this essay, why do those children starve and live grim lives, while people like me live in relative plenty? I think this essay has answered it. In essence, that child belonged to a race conquered by Europeans, and instead of charting their own economic way, that child’s ancestors lived in virtual or actual slavery to Western economic interests. Even when de jure colonialism ended, American-backed neocolonialism replaced it, and that child’s nation still lives under the West’s oppression. Most importantly of all, that child’s nation does not have much access to the world’s hydrocarbon energy, and the infrastructure and education to take advantage of such energy was never developed, usually as a consequence of not having energy access in the first place. If that starving child lives in Iraq, for instance, the great irony is that the child lives in a nation sitting on some of the world’s greatest hydrocarbon deposits, but Iraq was destroyed on behalf of Western oil interests, just as the Iranian government was overthrown generations previously, and Iran has yet to recover from that raping by the West, and the West is still threatening it after it kicked out the Western oil companies, as Iraq also did.


Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
24th April 2014, 21:39
Hi:

This has been the easiest writing of this essay, and below is kind of a prelude to that chapter.

Best,

Wade


Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

When I first had my dreams of changing the energy industry when I was 16, I had no idea what I was in for, but I have no regrets. My partner and I were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. When my partner first began thinking in terms of free energy in 1986, probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla. Although my partner began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received the first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, when the offer was raised to around a billion dollars, my partner realized that deep pockets with global influence were involved. Our nightmare did not really begin until he rejected their “offer.”

As my partner and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, a future colleague who was a former astronaut, Ivy League professor, and political activist was working on the frontiers of science. He not only investigated free energy technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon, and nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military for his trouble. Like us, he began waking up fast. A decade later, when I told him about the exotic technology show that a close friend received, his response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (few survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were often close to the truth. We all understood that hyper-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the Global Controllers, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that hyper-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop and bring free energy and antigravity technologies to the public. I discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop the strategy that this essay comprises a key part of. This essay’s chapter will put aside today’s reality of the hyper-elites and the public’s inertia and describe the kind of world that can await humanity if enough of us can overcome the barriers to bringing those technologies to the public, free energy most of all. The appearance of free energy would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on free energy could look like.

Although some scientists have challenged Carnot’s Second Law of Thermodynamics and even the First, tapping the zero-point energy field, as some fellow travelers did, does not violate the “laws of physics” at all; it is merely harnessing an energy source that mainstream science does not recognize, even though its greatest minds have posited its existence. Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes, but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any free energy device contest, and a variant of it is likely what my friend was shown. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem also may have been solved and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Also, my friend was shown antigravity technology in that underground demonstration. Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed a great deal of energy to operate. Free energy and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. As noted previously, that warehouse scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark is not all that fictional. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity? I have described many applications before (1, 2, 3), but will expand the tableau.

The immediate effect of free energy (“FE”) technology is the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy will quickly become obsolete. There may be some applications where some kind of flame is desired, and for those situations, burning hydrogen would seem the ideal practice, as water is split to make it and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could also be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and some immediate applications follow. When my astronaut colleague taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third is that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. My astronaut colleague’s work is some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of space ships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples. All pollution on Earth is caused by energy scarcity. With FE, all materials are infinitely recyclable, and any kind of pollution on Earth would likely be soon seen as the equivalent of flushing sewage into the water supply. Pollution would soon become as acceptable as slavery is.

On Star Trek, the replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the Global Controllers’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it, although I have never made it a practice to find out. Almost all that I know regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have told me they saw. I never solicited their testimony, but they had a need to tell me or those close to me. This chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it well could come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make this chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in this chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future, even as humanity begins to settle the solar system. One of humanity’s first tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all the junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but almost everything else would be cleaned up.

That would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets.

About the first application of FE is ending economic desperation for all peoples for all time. I will discuss those issues in this chapter, but the invader mentality should completely disappear from human consciousness if economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. During the human journey, from the very first humans that left Africa, or even taking it further to the first chimps that left the trees, or even taking it back to the mammals that lived in burrows and trees while the dinosaurs ruled, or the “pioneers” who colonized land, their invasive practices were always driven by survival issues. I believe in potential human sentience, and seeing how gladiators and slaves are seen in the West today as barbaric relics of our primitive past, I think it is reasonable to believe that when the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes obsolete, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only the most primitive beings engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not want us there, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those genocidal European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we are not wanted. As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time, we actually have some hints to help us imagine it, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to occupy the imagination, my astronaut colleague and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate, so the rest of this chapter will focus on how life on Earth can change for humanity, as well as our fellow organisms.

Wade Frazier
25th April 2014, 14:31
Hi:

For each epochal event, I have compared the before and after reality, and how the people before the event could have comprehended life after it. I just added my Fourth Epochal Event comparison, but here they all are at once, below. In the chapter I am writing, it will become evident that the Fifth Epochal Event will be just as incomprehensible to today’s people as those living before the other epochal events. That is part of the conundrum.

Best,

Wade

Epochal Event 1

If habilines began to control fire two mya, one thing is certain: the australopithecine Tesla who banged the first rocks together that fashioned a stone tool, and who was able to continue doing it and eventually taught others, probably via active demonstration or their observation, could not have imagined that his/her invention would lead to a relatively giant descendant (or cousin of a descendant) that slept on the ground, controlled fire, and would quickly migrate to the ends of Earth, traversing distances that were incomprehensible in australo-Tesla’s time. That relatively quick series of innovations, never before seen on Earth, gave birth to a creature that would have simply been unrecognizable to that australopithecine Tesla; it would have appeared magical. There have only been a few subsequent epochal events in the human journey, and like the first one(s), they were all energy events above all else, and were all dependent on humans gaining the technological prowess and social organization that enabled them to exploit a new energy source, which was likely dependent on their increasing mental talents. Each time, the human reality after the epochal event was unimaginable to the humans who lived immediately before it. Also, the events and their aftermaths became far more dramatic each time, in shrinking the event’s timeframe and shortening the time until the next epochal event, and the energy levels greatly increased each time.

Epochal Event 2

Similar to why our ancestors may have left the trees and why Homo erectus may have left Africa, that founder group may well have left Africa as an act of desperation, driven to the margins by their neighbors. If they left about 60-50 kya, as seems the most likely timeframe in light of today’s evidence, by 10 kya the entire planet had been conquered, with behaviorally modern humans atop all terrestrial food chains outside of Africa, and in Africa the megafauna avoided them, so there was nothing on Earth that threatened human existence except for other humans. Similar to how that australopithecine Tesla who made the first stone tool could not have imagined the Homo erectus that emerged from his/her act a half million years later, by 10 kya, about a tenth as long as the previous epochal innovative interval, several million descendants of that founder group were spread across the planet, from tundra to desert to rainforest, filling all inhabitable continents. The people existing 10 kya would have been anatomically recognizable and all had UP’s traits, as they do today. However, with cave paintings, microliths versus what the founders left Africa with, several million people versus a few hundred, the immensely diverse climates and the tools used to survive in them, as well as their mutually unintelligible languages, the founder group’s members would not have comprehended a tour of their descendants’ world. The founder’s descendants even began to look different as evolution marched onward, and many racial differences would have been noticeable, although the bizarre white skin, blond hair, and blue eyes had yet to appear. Some people of 10 kya even had companions called dogs, which would have seemed either a miracle, terror, or strange beyond imagining. The world’s large animals paid the ultimate price for fueling that expansion, and the Sixth Mass Extinction thus began.

Epochal Event 3

To again compare people from different epochs, where that stone tool Tesla could not have imagined what his/her invention would lead to a half million years later, or how a member of the founding group could not have comprehended what their journey led to fifty thousand years later, imagine a hunter-gatherer of ten thousand years ago being dropped into Rome at 100 CE, much less London in 1500 CE. History has some relevant examples. When Ishi, the last of his people, came out of hiding in his dying world and strode into civilization, it caused a sensation. He soon died of tuberculosis, but his encounters with civilization were recorded. He attended an opera, and the popular account portrayed his rapport with the diva, but Ishi actually stared in amazement at the audience, as he had never before seen so many people in one place. When he saw an airplane in flight, he laughed in amazement. Imagine a hunter-gatherer of ten thousand years ago being dropped into imperial Rome. That hunter-gatherer had seen dogs, but horses, cows, sheep, and the like would have been astounding, and watching a horse or ox pull a cart would have been stunning. Crops would have been an amazing sight. Imagine that hunter-gatherer at the Coliseum. The building and crowd alone would have boggled his mind, even if the festivities might have been horrifically familiar. Metals and glass would have seemed magical. Writing had not yet been invented in that hunter-gatherer’s world, so even the concept would have been difficult. Imagine him trying to learn math. There were no more singing and dancing religious rituals, and no wide-open spaces to hunt a meal. Imagine that hunter-gatherer visiting a Roman bath. Hot water alone would have been surreal, while the cavorting might have been delightful. What would his reaction have been to Rome’s markets? Rome was also loud and could be hellish, so the hunter-gather might have longed to flee to the countryside before long, but the countryside would have little resembled the one he knew. He obviously would not have understood anything that anybody said, but they were also all members of UP, so he would have seen many behaviors and traits that he eventually understood, but how long would his shock have lasted? Could he have really ever adapted to Roman society (if he did not quickly end up on the arena’s stage as a novelty)? It was all made possible by the local and stable energy source that agriculture provided, which led to an epoch that changed very little until the next energy source was tapped: the hydrocarbon energy that powered the Industrial Revolution. The next chapter will survey the developments that led to that momentous event. It is the only Epochal Event with historical documentation that showed how it developed, which is easier to reconstruct than examining stones and bones.

Epochal Event 4

A steam locomotive of 1850 roaring through the English countryside would have been inconceivable to an English peasant of 1500. From a half million years to fifty thousand years to ten thousand years to less than five hundred years, the duration of epochal event continued to shrink as levels of energy use increased nearly geometrically with each event.

As with the previous epochal events, imagine an English peasant of 1500 being placed in the midst of London in 2014, or visiting the average American home. The only metal in an English home of 1500 might have been some tools and eating utensils. Wood and wool were the primary materials in an English home. Some metals of the modern world would be vaguely familiar, but plastic would be unrecognizable. English peasants’ homes had thatched roofs, dirt floors, no plumbing, and people rarely bathed. Glass windows only existed in rich homes, which were built like fortresses. London was a walled city in 1500, and nobody went outside after dark if they valued their lives. Sewers did not yet exist, and violence and capital punishment were common. In England in 1500, only 1% of women were literate, and only 10% of men. About half of all people died before adulthood, and if they survived that long, they could expect to live into their fifties. Only rich people were fat. Strangers roaming the countryside could be enslaved. Modern appliances and machines would all be incomprehensible, and all electronic devices would seem magical. How much of a modern TV show would be understandable? Cars, trains, airplanes, and rockets would be mind-boggling. By 1500, news would have filtered into learned circles that Spain discovered some Atlantic islands, but nobody yet suspected that new continents had been discovered. The telescope would not be invented for another century, Earth was seen as the center of the universe, and the concept of a galaxy did not really exist. Imagine trying to explain the Apollo moon landings to that peasant, where the peasant did not regard it as some fairy tale (many people today regard it as a fairy tale). Could an English peasant from 1500 dropped into 2014 London have ever adapted?

Dennis Leahy
25th April 2014, 22:15
Hi:

This has been the easiest writing of this essay, and below is kind of a prelude to that chapter.

Best,

Wade


Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

When I first had my dreams of changing the energy industry when I was 16, I had no idea what I was in for, but I have no regrets. My partner and I were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. When my partner first began thinking in terms of free energy in 1986, probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla. Although my partner began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received the first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, when the offer was raised to around a billion dollars, my partner realized that deep pockets with global influence were involved. Our nightmare did not really begin until he rejected their “offer.”

As my partner and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, a future colleague who was a former astronaut, Ivy League professor, and political activist was working on the frontiers of science. He not only investigated free energy technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon, and nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military for his trouble. Like us, he began waking up fast. A decade later, when I told him about the exotic technology show that a close friend received, his response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (few survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were often close to the truth. We all understood that hyper-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the Global Controllers, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that hyper-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop and bring free energy and antigravity technologies to the public. I discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop the strategy that this essay comprises a key part of. This essay’s chapter will put aside today’s reality of the hyper-elites and the public’s inertia and describe the kind of world that can await humanity if enough of us can overcome the barriers to bringing those technologies to the public, free energy most of all. The appearance of free energy would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on free energy could look like.

Although some scientists have challenged Carnot’s Second Law of Thermodynamics and even the First, tapping the zero-point energy field, as some fellow travelers did, does not violate the “laws of physics” at all; it is merely harnessing an energy source that mainstream science does not recognize, even though its greatest minds have posited its existence. Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes, but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any free energy device contest, and a variant of it is likely what my friend was shown. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem also may have been solved and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Also, my friend was shown antigravity technology in that underground demonstration. Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed a great deal of energy to operate. Free energy and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. As noted previously, that warehouse scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark is not all that fictional. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity? I have described many applications before (1, 2, 3), but will expand the tableau.

The immediate effect of free energy (“FE”) technology is the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy will quickly become obsolete. There may be some applications where some kind of flame is desired, and for those situations, burning hydrogen would seem the ideal practice, as water is split to make it and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could also be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and some immediate applications follow. When my astronaut colleague taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third is that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. My astronaut colleague’s work is some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of space ships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples. All pollution on Earth is caused by energy scarcity. With FE, all materials are infinitely recyclable, and any kind of pollution on Earth would likely be soon seen as the equivalent of flushing sewage into the water supply. Pollution would soon become as acceptable as slavery is.

On Star Trek, the replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the Global Controllers’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it, although I have never made it a practice to find out. Almost all that I know regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have told me they saw. I never solicited their testimony, but they had a need to tell me or those close to me. This chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it well could come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make this chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in this chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future, even as humanity begins to settle the solar system. One of humanity’s first tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all the junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but almost everything else would be cleaned up.

That would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets.

About the first application of FE is ending economic desperation for all peoples for all time. I will discuss those issues in this chapter, but the invader mentality should completely disappear from human consciousness if economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. During the human journey, from the very first humans that left Africa, or even taking it further to the first chimps that left the trees, or even taking it back to the mammals that lived in burrows and trees while the dinosaurs ruled, or the “pioneers” who colonized land, their invasive practices were always driven by survival issues. I believe in potential human sentience, and seeing how gladiators and slaves are seen in the West today as barbaric relics of our primitive past, I think it is reasonable to believe that when the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes obsolete, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only the most primitive beings engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not want us there, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those genocidal European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we are not wanted. As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time, we actually have some hints to help us imagine it, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to occupy the imagination, my astronaut colleague and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate, so the rest of this chapter will focus on how life on Earth can change for humanity, as well as our fellow organisms. I wanted to quote the entire prelude back. I want to double the impact of your words.

Dennis

Wade Frazier
25th April 2014, 22:56
Hi Dennis:

Seeing your post was an LMAO moment. :)

I am banging away on the chapter, and it is both easier and harder than I expected. Many potential outcomes I have written about before, but there is also plenty of territory to cover and, while I feel up to the task, it will be the most mind-bending chapter of the essay, kind of on par with asking that 1500 English peasant to describe London in 2014, or Los Angeles. Many aspects of today’s world that people consider “normal” or “human nature” I am going to argue are merely side-effects of our economic situation, which will radically change with the appearance of FE. What all those changes will be, nobody can say for sure, but visions like Roads’s:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

allow me to “cheat” a little. :)

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
27th April 2014, 17:22
Hi:

Here is what the chapter draft looks like at the moment. I am now moving on to the next chapter. I think that I will finish my first drafting of the essay in this upcoming week. I will soon publish a first draft that scientists, editors, and other pals will beat on for a couple of months, and I will put on my editor’s hat, too, and the essay should be published sometime in the summer. What has been posted on this thread, as I have drafted the chapters, will look quite a bit different than the finished product. I also have been feeling time pressure that I have somehow been able to largely resist, but it can be improved and, as I have stated before, I will likely not write another essay like it in this lifetime. I plan to continue to revise some of the essays on my site today over the next few months, and when I finally publish that essay, I will start a forum to discuss that essay and my work, where I plan to raise the conversation far above what has been seen at Avalon so far. Also, I can see publishing revised editions of that essay in the future, like college textbook editions. But I have a hard time seeing the thrust of the essay change much, which I think will become obvious to readers as they digest it. The subject matter is pretty universal and timeless. While I expect other works to supersede it if humanity turns the corner, it will be enough for one man to manage in his lifetime. The writing is intended to stimulate thinking and discussion, and when enough know the song by heart, it will be time for action, but I am not looking for heroes. We will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade


Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

When I first had my dreams of changing the energy industry when I was 16, I had no idea what I was in for, but I have no regrets. My partner, named Dennis Lee, and I were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. When Dennis first began thinking in terms of free energy in 1986, probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla. Although Dennis began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received the first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, when the offer was raised to around a billion dollars, Dennis realized that deep pockets with global influence were involved. Our nightmare did not really begin until he rejected their “offer.”

As Dennis and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, Brian O’Leary was exploring the frontiers of science. Brian not only investigated free energy technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon and subsequently nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military. Like us, Brian began waking up fast. A decade later, when I told him about the exotic technology show that a close friend received, Brian’s response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (few survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were sometimes close to the truth. We all understood that ultra-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the GCs, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that ultra-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop free energy and antigravity technologies for public use. I also discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop my current strategy. This chapter will largely put aside today’s reality of the ultra-elites and the public’s inertia and describe the kind of world that can await humanity if enough of us can overcome the barriers to bringing those technologies to the public, free energy most of all. The appearance of free energy would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on free energy could look like.

Although some scientists have challenged Carnot’s Second Law of Thermodynamics and even the First, tapping the zero-point field, as some fellow travelers did, does not violate the “laws of physics” at all; it is merely harnessing an energy source that mainstream science does not recognize, even though its greatest minds have posited its existence. For that reason, Brian called such energy “New Energy,” and we co-founded a movement in 2003 with that name. However, when Dennis and I began to mount a business in 1987 around “New Energy,” he called it “free electricity” in ads, and we used the term “free energy” before we knew anything about the field or our professional ancestors. I used the term “free energy” for many years before I heard the term “new energy,” and I will likely always use “free energy” (“FE”), largely because I grew up with it and it is still commonly used in the field. Dennis’s shared savings programs were also the closest thing to truly “free” energy that has ever been on the world market.

Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes, but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any FE device contest, and a variant of it is likely what my friend was shown. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem may also have been solved, and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid-state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Also, my friend was shown antigravity technology in that underground demonstration. Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed vast amounts of energy to operate. Free energy and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. As noted previously, that warehouse scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark is not all that fictional. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity? I have described many applications before (1, 2, 3), but will expand the discussion.

The immediate effect of FE technology is the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy will quickly become archaic and rarely done. Some applications may need a flame, and for such situations, burning hydrogen would seem ideal, as water is split to make it, and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could also be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere. The same could be easily done for methane, artificial chemicals, and the like.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is likely the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and some immediate applications follow. When Brian taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third is that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. Brian’s work was some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of spaceships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples. All pollution on Earth is caused by energy scarcity. With FE, all materials are infinitely recyclable, and any kind of pollution on Earth would likely become seen as the equivalent of flushing sewage into the water supply. Pollution would soon become as acceptable as slavery is.

On Star Trek, replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the GCs’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it. Almost all that I know and feel comfortable reporting regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have described, usually by telling me directly. I never solicited their testimony, but they had a need to talk. This chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it could well come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make this chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in this chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future, even as humanity began to settle the solar system. One of humanity’s first tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but nearly everything else would be cleaned up.

Cleaning up human space junk would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets. It may be decided that the entire asteroid belt should be consolidated into one “planet” that can be mined for raw materials when needed. It would be less than a twentieth of our Moon’s mass.

About FE’s first application would be ending economic desperation for all peoples for all time, and the invader mentality should completely disappear from human consciousness if economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. During the human journey, from the very first humans that left Africa, or even taking it further to the first chimps that left the trees, or going further back to the mammals that lived in burrows and trees while the dinosaurs ruled, or the “pioneers” who colonized land, their invasive practices were always driven by survival issues. I believe in potential human sentience, and seeing how gladiators and slaves are seen in the West today as barbaric relics of our primitive past, I think it is reasonable to expect that when the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes outmoded, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only those with the most primitive mentalities engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not welcome us, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those genocidal European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we were not wanted. As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time we have some hints, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to capture the imagination, Brian and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate, so the rest of this chapter will focus on how life on Earth can change for humanity, as well as our fellow organisms.

With FE, many concepts used today to describe economic and environmental reality will be superseded. One is called the carbon footprint, which is a result of burning hydrocarbons to get our energy. That will become immediately anachronistic and meaningless. There are similar “footprint” concepts, such as the footprint that humanity has on Earth’s ecosystems. In 2007, it was calculated that humanity was harvesting Earth’s ecosystems at a rate of 150% of their productivity. In financial terms, that is called eating into the capital, not living on the interest. The most dramatic change that FE will have on Earth is that humans will no longer exploit ecosystems to survive. At Japanese rice farmer levels of productivity, an American suburban yard could provide the food for the family that lives in the house. Even if we ignore the many exotic materials that have been developed and suppressed, imagine an indoor environment that can be as hot, cold, light, dark, wet, or dry as desired, and however much water and other nutrients were needed were freely available. Growing racks could be stacked three high or more, for example, with continual lighting, and food productivity under those conditions could reduce that food footprint to the “basement” of the spacious home sitting atop it. Would the family want to raise tropical fruits? Root crops? Seed crops? Fruit and nut trees? The septic system could be made to recycle the sewage into clean nutrients for crops. Water could be continually recycled, beginning each cycle with distilled-level purity. Would the house have a swimming pool of continually pure water with a robotic lifeguard? What water temperature would be desired? A completely self-contained family living system could be readily developed, and it would contain “luxuries” scarcely imaginable today. Or it could be made for one person. It could also be self-contained regarding its gases, constantly recycled.

Think of Star Trek and its replicators to get an idea of would be largely feasible today, if energy was unlimited and created no environmental harm to produce it, and everybody could produce their own. Add antigravity technology to the mix, and where do you want your self-contained dwelling to go? On Mars? Traveling the Kuiper Belt? Floating on Earth’s ocean? Floating above the clouds? Underground on Earth? Those are just some of the innumerable possibilities. Maybe most people would want to live on Earth’s continents. Maybe instead of self-contained dwellings, small communities would have a food-growing center, maybe underground, maybe in the air, and maybe on the ground, but since that food unit could go anywhere, why wreck the ecosystem to host it there? I believe that when people experience economic abundance, and nothing is harmed to provide it, the zero-sum game and its many rationalizations will become as vulgar as all the justifications for slavery not so long ago.

Just as humanity can clean up its space junk, all of the insults that humans, particularly industrialized humans, have inflicted on Earth can also be remediated as among FE’s first applications. There are floating garbage patches in the world’s oceans, primarily comprised of plastic. That could be easily cleaned up, mostly with automated equipment, and is another temporary assignment that I would happily volunteer for. The entire concept of disposable plastics that enter the environment would be rethought and redesigned. All landfills, waste dumps, mine tailings, and the like would be recycled into their constituent elements or made harmless, and all of Earth’s environments would be restored. With FE and related technologies, those tasks would be easily completed. As I discovered when promoting a way to remediate nuclear waste, just like all the fake philanthropy, businesses such as nuclear waste management are simply more rackets. If not for corporate and GC interference, those issues would be easily remedied.

For those who fear skies filled with colliding craft, that will not happen. The days of human-piloted craft are quickly coming to an end. By 2012, automobiles without drivers had logged a half million kilometers of driving the USA’s highways without incident, and self-driving cars being sold by the early 2020s are predicted. By the time that antigravity craft are made for public use, I would expect that they are all computer-piloted. When I have floated these ideas past people, some who even call themselves visionaries, the immediate reaction is almost always fearful, imagining all that could go wrong, before they even think about the benefits. That is a universal problem that I will address later.

Along with FE, antigravity, and exotic materials being suppressed, I am also aware that computer technology vastly superior to what is on the market today has been developed, and communication technology has been developed that in some ways resembles Star Trek’s subspace communications. I do not know a great deal about what has been developed in that realm, but firsthand accounts of some fellow travelers have been eye-opening. I suspect that if FE and antigravity breakout beyond organized suppression, the floodgates will open and the “problems” that humanity will face will be what technologies to deploy first. It is almost certain that humanity’s current communication technologies will be highly primitive compared to what already exists and is hidden, so I expect that none of the current satellites in orbit around Earth will continue use, but will be retired, and the concept of satellites for communication and viewing Earth will radically change.

Today, capitalist interests have turned industrial waste into “medicine” and concocted other Big Lies that the public has swallowed whole. Greed and other deadly sins have been turned into virtues in our crazed world. If abundance comes to pass, if a practice is discovered to be harmful, then it will be abandoned and a harmless method will be developed and implemented. What will not happen is that those “invested” in the harmful practice will brainwash the public, with compliant “scientists” who have sold their souls, to turn poison into medicine, call addictive junk food (that capitalizes on the evolutionary energetic adaptation to prefer sweet and fatty foods) nutritious, and the many other evil practices that parade today as beneficial or benign. Without huge capitalistic interest involved (the GCs are capitalism on steroids), which are only concerned with profit, those kinds of practices will end.

Numbers and measurement will still exist, but egocentric economics that focuses on money and self-interest to the exclusion of all else will disappear, as will anthropocentric economics, where ecosystem health is only seen in terms of how it can support human welfare. The economic view that will supersede those frameworks is what I call life-centric or soul-centric, and it measures and values the wellbeing of all life on Earth, not just human welfare.

If land-farming becomes viewed as primitive, seen about as stone tools are today, and we can get all of our raw materials from around the solar system and easily manipulate them for our use, why would we ever again harm the fragile ecosystem that was our original home? Those kinds of practices would quickly be seen as primitive and born of desperation, and will be universally abandoned. Under an FE-based economy, eating animal flesh will likely be seen as unnecessary, primitive, and barbaric, and would soon end. Similarly, drugs and other inebriants are all brief escapes from misery, and when everybody’s standard of living leaps upward by a few orders of magnitude, the desire for inebriants will decline and likely vanish.

Nations such as Japan and Germany have advanced robotics, especially with their aging and low-birthrate populations. Also, the GCs’ suppressed and sequestered technologies also involve robotics. Very quickly, there would not be any “job” that required human drudgery, anywhere on Earth. Those would be some of the easiest situations to remedy.

With the appearance of FE and related technologies, all human needs would be easily met with almost no human effort. Think of the “workday” of an average adult being about an hour, to provide all of humanity’s necessities at a standard of living that makes Bill Gates appear a pauper. Just as the world’s richest man in 1700 lived a primitive life compared to the average American, in an FE-based economy, future generations will marvel that the world’s richest man in 2000 never even left his home planet, like some galactic bumpkin. Instead of riding hundreds of energy slaves, each human would ride thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even more. In our scarcity-based world, and especially in greed-is-a-virtue nations such as the USA, the idea of all humans having their basic needs met is decried as “socialism” and worse, but if all of humanity could almost effortlessly be fed, housed, and clothed, and transportation and communication were also easily accomplished, why would they be denied anybody on the basis of somebody’s greed? That is the case today, with the games that the GCs play, but this chapter is about imagining that that initial hurdle was cleared. All of the world’s nations, other than the USA, have long advocated that food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education should be universal human rights. The only nation that officially vetoed that idea is history’s richest and most powerful. What is wrong with that picture?

In summary, a world without environmental destruction and poverty would quickly come to pass with the most basic of the technologies that I know exist. But what may challenge most of today’s minds are the many features of today’s civilization that will quickly become archaic, viewed as slavery and gladiator “games” are today. A key aspect of civilization that will disappear with the release of those technologies is the same aspect that is suppressing them; with economic abundance, elites will become obsolete. Elites have always been economic elites above all else, and all elites for all time have engaged in conspicuous economic consumption as the mark of their status. Slavery appeared with civilization and disappeared with industrialization. Elites appeared with civilization and will disappear with the Fifth Epochal Event, which is why ultra-elites have worked so hard to prevent it. They see their very existence being at stake. For most “normal” people, that can seem a bizarre view, but ultra-elites are addicted to political power and their ability to rule an entire planet, and imposing fear and scarcity are their primary methods of maintain their position. While each industrialized human rides hundreds of energy slaves, ultra-elites see themselves as riding billions of actual slaves. Many of them will not willingly relinquish their position, even if the planet is made uninhabitable as a consequence. Fortunately, even most ultra-elites realize the insanity of that position, and cooler heads may prevail. Instead of ruling in hell, elites will become regular members of something that resembles heaven on Earth.

When that elite domino tumbles, what else becomes obsolete? The reasons for cities to appear were ease of communication and social interaction, and the surplus energy delivered from the hinterland to urban environments allowed for the specialization that led to professions. The energetic exploitation of a hinterland and low energy transportation lanes to deliver it made cities possible. With the ability to travel and communicate anywhere on Earth nearly instantly, and with the myriad problems of urban civilization, who would want to live cheek-by-jowl in cities? With the kinds of lifestyles made possible by those technologies, nobody I know would choose to live in a city. Urban environments would likely become obsolete, or the function of what remained would radically change. There will be social gatherings, perhaps large ones, and there might be something resembling factories, farms, offices, and the like, but there would not be any reason to cram them together, as energy scarcity underlies most urban features (low-energy transportation lanes, high-density dwellings at the end of those lanes). A modern city is essentially a huge, energy-concentrating device, where the energy efficiencies of centralized production, distribution, and consumption are critical features which become meaningless in an FE-based world.

In the site that I published in 2002, a prominent argument was that nearly everything that Americans did was worthless for creating and maintaining the USA’s standard of living. Professions involved in exchange will all become pointless in a world of economic abundance, which include accountants, cashiers, lawyers, police, and soldiers. Entire industries, such as banking and insurance, will disappear. Politicians will largely cease to exist, especially those on today’s world stage, who are puppets of economic interests. Even seemingly worthwhile professions are largely rackets, such as Western medicine. With most people performing intrinsically worthless activities, what will happen when such professions and industries disappear? Will everybody just lay around, watch TV, and get fat? I doubt it. I do not have enough years in my lifetime to get my life list done. If people think about all the activities that are designed to relieve stress, cope with fear, and the like, many less-obvious activities will also fade to oblivion. In that world, which sources I respect have described in other star systems, time spent “working” is called “joy time,” as beings are fulfilled as they contribute to their civilizations in a meaningful way, they do it by using their particular talents, and there is no such thing as drudgery. Also, the idea of competition will likely vanish, as will the “entertainments” that enthrall so many today, such as sports, competitive games, beauty competitions, and the like. “Entertainment” with winners and losers will no longer be attractive, rooted as it is in ideas of scarcity, and celebrity culture and gossip will also be discarded. All such primitive behaviors and ideals will fade away, and they will not be missed.

As my fellow travelers and I have pursued free energy and a healed planet and humanity, the nearly universal reactions to our efforts were denial and fear, which often led to us being attacked. Denial is a fear reaction, so we always found the barrier to be fear. If people got past denial and fear of “unexpected outcomes,” then greed usually destroyed the efforts. Greed is the fear of never having enough, so once again, fear defeated the effort. Those reactions usually happened long before organized suppression was applied. When the agents of organized suppression arrived, they almost effortlessly defeated the efforts by using people’s fear and greed against them. When I saw it happen the first few times, I initially refused to believe it. We made the GCs’ task easy. Their efforts easily turned my own mother against me. The opposite of fear is love, which has always been the crux of this conundrum and will be addressed later. This chapter is about what life looks like after we get over the hump; I honor some fears, but they can be addressed.

Economic motives have always been at the root of all wars, and Fuller noted the same motivation behind all soldiers. Even one of Hitler’s henchmen observed how any society can be motivated to war by fear, so why would wars break out when everybody lived in abundance? There are some legitimate transition fears, and I advocate a global peacekeeping force, ideally staffed with grandmothers, who would ensure that the transition to a world based on abundance was not marred by warfare. Today, the GCs can detect when anybody accesses the zero-point field, and weaponization of FE technology could probably be detected and just as easily disabled. I would happily deputize grandmothers (and not male-model women such as Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, etc.) to take the toys away from the boys who cannot seem to play nicely, until the utter stupidity of such behavior becomes universally obvious and nobody needs to be reminded anymore. I envision a solar-system-wide government forming, but its only charges would be safety, ensuring that everybody had life’s necessities, and promoting a dynamic unity among all peoples. It would be a government based on love and abundance, not fear and scarcity. That government will not be about amassing power, catering to economic elites, defending borders, and playing the adolescent games that we see on today’s world stage. Today’s retail political activity would resemble chimpanzee politics from the perspective of that FE-based civilization. There would not be huge punitive legal systems and prisons, but justice and healing would always be the goal. What today are called “criminals” would be recognized as sick people in need of help, not punishment. The most recalcitrant might be sequestered from society, but placed in environments of healing and education, not punishment. Criminal mentalities would not last long, either, nor could they be successfully hidden as they are today. The innumerable secret games being played today will largely vanish, and almost nobody would see the point of playing them. Abundance would make many behaviors called “human nature” today simply disappear.

The concept of nations will be among the first ideas to become obsolete, as will all such territorial ideologies. Other dramatic changes in humanity will happen that may not be obvious at first. Humanity’s races are the result of evolution, where geographic isolation and environmental adaption have led to incipient speciation, and hair, skin, and eye color are superficial changes. All human races can interbreed, and when geographic isolation ends with a humanity that can easily travel throughout the solar system, not only will racism end, but so will race. There will be only one race, probably within a few hundred years after FE appears, and racism is already under siege in nations such as the USA, and racism, along with all such “isms,” always had an economic rationale that elevated one group at the expense of others. All of those scarcity-based systems, judgments, and ideologies will quickly become senseless, just as so many others have during the course of human civilization. Just as the races are a product of geographic and genetic isolation that will disappear as the isolation does, humanity will likely use only one language. As with disappearing races, the process of languages disappearing will likely take centuries. Maybe something like Esperanto will rise again, or a lingua franca such as English will persist for a time (and computer-based language translation is increasingly common and sophisticated), but eventually one language will unify humanity. Science has been called a universal language, but the universal conversational language will likely resemble an English/Chinese blend or something similar. All human languages are UP’s languages, so that universal language will be easily learned by all. Maybe some “mother tongues” will survive, or a few languages will survive, with them being used for various disciplines (one being more scientific, while another is more social/mystical in nature, and so on), but I doubt they will survive for long.

Today’s organized religions will all become obsolete, as the roots of religion were based in winning wars, and today’s religions are all priesthood-serving distortions of valid perceptions of spiritual masters. They have all waned in influence with industrialization, and when abundance reigns instead of scarcity, no enlightened ideas will be distorted into methods of social control and supporting economic rackets. There will be spiritual practices, but they will not rest on the violence-, fear-, and scarcity-based foundations of today’s religions. Today’s New Age-type religions are usually tired retreads of the same constructions that the original priesthoods built, with male leaders crafting their messages, which often have some validity, into building economic empires, replete with harems and other perquisites.

Darwin began his Origin of the Species with describing the evolutionary effects of domestication. Humans have already created unprecedented evolutionary trends, and a prominent speculation among scientists is that humans have domesticated themselves and genes for the bellicosity of warfare, for instance, may be getting culled from the human gene pool. With industrialization, violence has been proportionally diminished, and may be on its way to dying out. The entire dominance model of human relations will likely become a relic of our primitive heritage.

The human nuclear family was a change from ape social organization, giving more males an opportunity to procreate, but it is also an economic institution, as have been extended families and the like. Family and clan organization began to disappear with the first cities in Sumer. What will happen to family structures with FE and abundance? Bearing children is hard on a woman, and it is difficult to imagine a population explosion with FE and abundance, as women will have better things to do than become baby factories. Maybe the human population will significantly decline in a continuance of today’s demographic transition, but even if it rose, since humanity will not place a burden on Earth’s ecosystems, it would not matter like it does today.

Humans can radically alter the course of life on Earth, even more so than we already have. Artificial selection has proven to be far more powerful than natural selection, and with the human ability to alter its environment, natural selection itself could become largely irrelevant where humanity is concerned. I will return to this subject soon, but while those ideas can seem to encourage megalomania, it could also point the way to horizons that we can scarcely imagine, that do not have to become Blade Runner-ish nightmares.

During the history of life on Earth and the human journey, there were many golden ages, where energy was relatively abundant, whether it was new ecological niches with few competitors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14), “virgin” continents awaiting the “settlers,” (1, 2, 3), or the early days of exploiting a new energy source (1, 2, 3, 4), but the good times ended as others arrived to take their share of the energy or the energy source was depleted. If there is more potential energy in one cubic centimeter of “empty” space than scientists think exists in the entire visible universe, when do you think that energy will run out? For all practical human purposes, the energy would be inexhaustible. Michio Kaku has popularized the idea of galactic civilizations ranked on levels of energy usage, and under that scale, humanity has not yet reached the first level. An FE-based civilization would probably rank as a Type 1. I am not too interested in humanity becoming a Type 2 or Type 3 civilization, and maybe none exist in our universe. Those can seem like rather pompous ideas to today’s humans. Taking care of our own planet and fellow creatures is enough challenge for our species for the foreseeable future. I would happily settle for humans just learning those lessons for the next million years or so, before embarking on anything more ambitious. Humanity is not yet toilet-trained as a species, and reaching that galactically modest level is what the work of FE activists I respect has generally been devoted toward. Anything beyond that will be a bonus and far into the future.

The training that enabled remote viewings and other psychic feats ruined many scientific careers, as scientists received direct personal experience that the materialistic paradigm that guides mainstream science is false. Brian and I had our first remote viewing experiences performing the same exercise in the 1970s. I performed experiments regarding the human ability to generate a subtle energy that prevents rotting, and was able to generate great heat with my hands, which others have developed to far higher levels of mastery. Brian performed similar experiments and advocated a scientific approach to investigating such phenomena. Nearly all of my fellow travelers in the FE field had some kind of experience like that in their late teens or early twenties. Most were scientists or scientists-in-training. When people have experiences such as those, they will never accept the materialistic assumptions that dominate mainstream science. As noted previously, the giants of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, fully realized the orthodox framework’s limitations and all held “heretical” ideas that could be called mystical. Many organizations have sought to remedy the affliction of mainstream science that views consciousness as a mere epiphenomenon of brain activity. I met Brian at a conference for one such organization. It has been called bridging the gap between science and religion, and other terms. I see it as bringing science and consciousness together. Brian was a speaker at that conference, and his talk’s subject was the need for a new science. Until mainstream science allows consciousness into its paradigm and rejects its materialistic assumptions, it will be playing a small game, as the greatest science of all may be the science of consciousness.

There is a great deal of evidence, nearly all of it suppressed, that we are not alone in the universe. It is being suppressed for the same reason that FE, antigravity, and myriad other technologies are being suppressed: so that the ultra-elites can continue sitting upon their perch atop the global food chain. The issues are deeply related, and either situation overcoming the organized suppression will likely resolve the other almost instantaneously, and they might happen at the same moment. Although the Brookings Institute advised NASA for caution regarding any ET disclosures, the days of a War of the Worlds reaction are long gone. Knowing that we are not alone in the universe, and that our journey may have been significantly influenced by ET visitors (such as the velocity of today’s technological revolution), will change humanity’s self-image and likely the way that we end up interacting with galactic civilizations, but that will all pale beside the economic and social changes that FE, antigravity, and related technologies will initiate. That is all unexplored territory that I, for one, look forward to wandering.

All of today’s dominant ideologies will become obsolete in a world where abundance reigns, and all abundance notions have to be based on energy abundance above all else. If energy is not abundant, none of the abundance ideas put forth by various visionaries have much hope of coming to fruition.

The ideas presented in this chapter can be seen as vague ideas, if the Fifth Epochal Event happens. I can no more predict the specific outcomes of the Fifth Epochal Event than that English peasant of 1500 could predict the end of slavery, the invention of the Internet, the demographic transition, the liberation of women, Hollywood, nuclear weapons, or rockets to the moon. All longtime FE visionaries realize that an FE-based future is far beyond their ability to truly imagine, but none of them are unhappy with that circumstance.

However, for this Epochal Event, unlike the others, we actually have some hints of what might lie ahead, and Star Trek provides one such vision of a potential future. Brian went from astronaut to psychonaut, and I have known world-class psychonauts, some of whom visited other dimensions and returned with Earth-shaking inventions (always stolen or suppressed, of course). One set of visions has been a star that I have steered by since the mid-1990s, and is particularly inspiring. That psychonaut visited two future human realities, about 300 years into our future. They were on opposite ends of the fear/love spectrum. Both were technologically advanced compared to today and both had genetic engineering, but the fear-dominated reality made Blade Runner’s Los Angeles seem like Disneyland, while a Disney movie could not begin to depict the love-based one. Visions like that make it clear to me that our future will be what we make it. What we choose to do, today, determines what our tomorrow looks like. The fear-based world was filled with victims, from top to bottom, while those in that other world all acted like true creators, and creators create with love. Love has always been the answer, and learning that lesson may be the reason why we are here, playing this life-on-Earth game.

Joseph McAree
27th April 2014, 22:29
Wade, that chapter was just awe inspiring, I have been reading your essays for some time now, just reading away chapter after chapter trying to keep up with the work you do, I know what future I want for my children and my grandchildren.
The essay is amazing and I look forward to reading it as a complete work.
I thank you again for allowing me to read your draft essay through project Avalon,
Kindest regards
Joe

Wade Frazier
27th April 2014, 22:32
Thanks Joe. I am putting up these chapter drafts for a few reasons, and one of them is so that people like you can get a peek. :)

Going hiking now.

Best,

Wade

Dennis Leahy
28th April 2014, 00:32
Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy


When I first had my dreams of changing the energy industry when I was 16, I had no idea what I was in for, but I have no regrets. My partner and I were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. When my partner first began thinking in terms of free energy in 1986, probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla. Although my partner began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received the first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, when the offer was raised to around a billion dollars, my partner realized that deep pockets with global influence were involved. Our nightmare did not really begin until he rejected their “offer.”

As my partner and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, Brian O’Leary was exploring the frontiers of science. He not only investigated free energy technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon and nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military for his trouble. Like us, he began waking up fast. A decade later, when I told him about the exotic technology show that a close friend received, his response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (few survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were sometimes close to the truth. We all understood that hyper-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the Global Controllers, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that hyper-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop free energy and antigravity technologies for public use. I also discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop my current strategy. This chapter will largely put aside today’s reality of the hyper-elites and the public’s inertia and describe the kind of world that can await humanity if enough of us can overcome the barriers to bringing those technologies to the public, free energy most of all. The appearance of free energy would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on free energy could look like.

Although some scientists have challenged Carnot’s Second Law of Thermodynamics and even the First, tapping the zero-point field, as some fellow travelers did, does not violate the “laws of physics” at all; it is merely harnessing an energy source that mainstream science does not recognize, even though its greatest minds have posited its existence. For that reason, Brian O’Leary called such energy “New Energy,” and we co-founded a movement in 2003 with that name. However, when my partner and I began to mount a business in 1987 around “New Energy,” he called it “free electricity” in ads, and we used the term “free energy” before we knew anything about the field or our professional ancestors. I used the term “free energy” for many years before I heard the term “new energy,” and I will likely always use “free energy” (“FE”), largely because I grew up with it and it is still commonly used in the field. My partner’s shared savings programs were also the closest thing to truly “free” energy that has ever been on the world market.

Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes, but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any FE device contest, and a variant of it is likely what my friend was shown. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem may also have been solved, and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Also, my friend was shown antigravity technology in that underground demonstration. Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed vast amounts of energy to operate. Free energy and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. As noted previously, that warehouse scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark is not all that fictional. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity? I have described many applications before (1, 2, 3), but will expand the discussion.

The immediate effect of FE technology is the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy will quickly become archaic and rarely done. Some applications may need a flame, and for such situations, burning hydrogen would seem ideal, as water is split to make it, and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could also be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is likely the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and some immediate applications follow. When Brian O’Leary taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third is that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. Brian’s work was some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of spaceships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples. All pollution on Earth is caused by energy scarcity. With FE, all materials are infinitely recyclable, and any kind of pollution on Earth would likely become seen as the equivalent of flushing sewage into the water supply. Pollution would soon become as acceptable as slavery is.

On Star Trek, replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the Global Controllers’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it. Almost all that I know and feel comfortable reporting regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have stated what they saw, usually telling me directly. I never solicited their testimony, but they had a need to talk. This chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it could well come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make this chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in this chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future, even as humanity begins to settle the solar system. One of humanity’s first tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all of the junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but almost everything else would be cleaned up.

Cleaning up human space junk would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets. It may be decided that the entire asteroid belt be consolidated into one “planet” that can be mined for raw materials when needed. It would be less than a twentieth the size of our Moon.

About FE’s first application would be ending economic desperation for all peoples for all time, and the invader mentality should completely disappear from human consciousness if economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. During the human journey, from the very first humans that left Africa, or even taking it further to the first chimps that left the trees, or going further back to the mammals that lived in burrows and trees while the dinosaurs ruled, or the “pioneers” who colonized land, their invasive practices were always driven by survival issues. I believe in potential human sentience, and seeing how gladiators and slaves are seen in the West today as barbaric relics of our primitive past, I think it is reasonable to believe that when the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes outmoded, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only the most primitive beings engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not want us there, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those genocidal European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we were not wanted. As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time we have some hints, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to occupy the imagination, Brian O’Leary and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate, so the rest of this chapter will focus on how life on Earth can change for humanity, as well as our fellow organisms.

With FE, many concepts used today to describe economic and environmental reality will be superseded. One is called the carbon footprint, which is a result of burning hydrocarbons to get our energy. That will become immediately anachronistic and meaningless. There are similar “footprint” concepts, such as the footprint that humanity has on Earth’s ecosystems. In 2007, it was calculated that humanity was harvesting Earth’s ecosystems at a rate of 150% of their productivity. In finance terms, that is called eating into the capital, not living on the interest. The most dramatic change that FE will have on Earth is that humans will no longer exploit ecosystems to survive. As previously noted, at Japanese rice farmer levels of productivity, an American suburban yard could provide the food for the family that lives in the house. Even if we ignore the many exotic materials that have been created and suppressed, imagine an indoor environment that can be as hot, cold, light, dark, wet, or dry as desired, and however much water and other nutrients were needed were freely available. Growing racks could be stacked three high or more, for example, with continual lighting, and food productivity under those conditions could reduce that food footprint to the “basement” of the spacious home sitting atop it. Would the family want to raise tropical fruits? Root crops? Seed crops? Fruit and nut trees? The septic system could be made to recycle the sewage into clean nutrients for crops. The water could be continually recycled, beginning the cycle with distilled-level purity. Would the house have a swimming pool of continually pure water with a robotic lifeguard? What water temperature would be desired? A completely self-contained family living system could be readily developed, and it would contain “luxuries” scarcely imaginable today. Or it could be made for one person. It could also be self-contained regarding its gases, constantly recycled. Think of Star Trek and its replicators to get an idea of would be largely feasible today, if energy was unlimited and created no environmental harm to produce it, and everybody could produce their own. Add antigravity technology to the mix, and where do you want your self-contained dwelling to go? On Mars? Traveling the Kuiper Belt? Floating on Earth’s ocean? Floating above the clouds? Underground on Earth? Those are just some of the innumerable possibilities. Maybe most people would want to live on Earth’s continents. Maybe instead of self-contained dwellings, small communities would have a food-growing center, maybe underground, maybe in the air, and maybe on the ground, but since that food unit could go anywhere, why wreck the ecosystem for all other creatures to host it there? I believe that when people experience economic abundance, and nothing is harmed to provide it, the zero-sum game and its many rationalizations will be seen as vulgar as all the justifications for slavery not so long ago.

Just as humanity can clean up its space junk, all of the insults that humans, particularly industrialized humans, have inflicted on Earth can also be remediated as among FE’s first applications. There are floating garbage patches in the world’s oceans, primarily comprised of plastic. That could be easily cleaned up, mostly with automated equipment, and is another temporary assignment that I would happily volunteer for. The entire concept of disposable plastics that enter the environment would be rethought and redesigned. All landfills, waste dumps, mine tailings, and the like would be recycled into their constituent elements or made harmless, and all of Earth’s environments would be restored. With FE and related technologies, those tasks would be easily completed. As I discovered when promoting a way to remediate nuclear waste, just like all the fake philanthropy, businesses such as nuclear waste management are simply more rackets. If not for corporate and Global Controller interference, those issues would be easily remedied.

For those who fear skies filled with colliding craft, that will not happen. The days of human-piloted craft are quickly coming to an end. By 2012, automobiles without drivers had a logged a half million kilometers of driving the USA’s highways without incident, and self-driving cars being sold by the early 2020s are predicted. By the time that antigravity craft are made for public use, I would expect that they are all computer-piloted. When I have floated these ideas past people, some who even call themselves visionaries, the immediate reaction is almost always fearful, imagining all that could go wrong, before they even think about the benefits. That is a universal problem that I will address later.

Along with FE, antigravity, and exotic materials being suppressed, I am also aware that computer technology vastly superior to what is on the market today has been developed, and communication technology has been developed that in some ways resembles Star Trek’s subspace communications. I do not know a great deal about what has been developed in that realm, but firsthand accounts of some fellow travelers have been eye-opening. I suspect that if FE and antigravity breakout beyond organized suppression, the floodgates will open and the “problems” that humanity will face will be what technologies to deploy first. It is almost certain that humanity’s current communication technologies will be highly primitive compared to what already exists and is hidden, so I expect that none of the current satellites in orbit around Earth will continue use, but will be retired, and the concept of satellites for communication and viewing Earth will radically change.

Today, capitalist interests have turned industrial waste into “medicine” and concocted other Big Lies that the public has swallowed whole. Greed and other deadly sins have been turned into virtues in our insane world. If abundance comes to pass, if a practice is discovered to be harmful, then it will be abandoned and a harmless method will be developed and implemented. What will not happen is that those “invested” in the harmful practice will brainwash the masses, with compliant “scientists” who have sold their souls, to turn poison into medicine, call addictive junk food (that capitalizes on the evolutionary energetic adaptation to prefer sweet and fatty foods) nutritious, and the many other evil insanities that parade today as beneficial or benign. Without huge capitalistic interest involved, which are only concerned with profit, those kinds of practices will end.

If land-farming becomes viewed as primitive, seen about as stone tools are today, and we can get all of our raw materials from around the solar system and easily manipulate them for our use, why would we ever again harm the fragile ecosystem that was our original home? Those kinds of practices would quickly be seen as primitive and born of desperation, and will be universally abandoned. Under an FE-based economy, eating animal flesh will likely be seen as unnecessary, primitive, and barbaric, and would soon end. Similarly, drugs and other inebriants are all brief escapes from misery, and when everybody’s standard of living leaps upward by a few orders of magnitude, the desire for inebriants will decline and likely vanish.

Nations such as Japan and Germany have advanced robotics, especially with their aging and low-birthrate populations. Also, the suppressed and sequestered technologies also involve robotics. Very quickly, there would not be any “job” that required human drudgery, anywhere on Earth. Those would be some of the easiest situations to remedy.

What will quickly happen is that all human needs can be easily met with almost no human effort. Think of the average “workday” of an average adult being about an hour, to provide all of humanity’s necessities at a standard of living that makes Bill Gates appear a pauper. Just as the world’s richest man in 1700 lived a primitive life compared to the average American, in an FE-based economy, future generations will marvel that the world’s richest man in 2000 never even left his home planet, like some galactic bumpkin. Instead of riding hundreds of energy slaves, each human would ride thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even more. In our scarcity-based world, and especially in greed-is-a-virtue nations such as the USA, such an idea of all humans having their basic needs met is decried as “socialism” and worse, but if all of humanity could almost effortlessly be fed, housed, and clothed, and transportation and communication were also effortlessly accomplished, why would they be denied anybody on the basis of somebody’s greed? That is the case today, with the games that the Global Controllers play, but this chapter is about imagining that that initial hurdle was cleared. All of the world’s nations, other than the USA, have long advocated that food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education should be universal human rights. The only nation that officially vetoed that idea is history’s richest and most powerful. What is wrong with that picture?

In summary, a world without environmental destruction and poverty would quickly come to pass with the most basic of the technologies that I know exist. But what may challenge most of today’s minds are the many features of today’s civilization that will quickly become archaic, viewed as slavery and gladiator “games” are today. Probably the most important aspect of civilization disappearing with the release of those technologies is the same aspect that is suppressing them; with economic abundance, elites become obsolete. Elites have always been economic elites above all else, and all elites for all time have engaged in conspicuous economic consumption as the mark of their status. Slavery appeared with civilization and disappeared with industrialization. Elites appeared with civilization and will disappear with the Fifth Epochal Event, which is why hyper-elites have worked so hard to prevent it. They see their very existence being at stake. For most “normal” people, that can seem a bizarre view, but hyper-elites are addicted to political power and their ability to rule an entire planet. While each industrialized human rides hundreds of energy slaves, hyper-elites see themselves as riding billions of actual slaves. They will not willingly relinquish that perquisite, even if the planet is made uninhabitable as a consequence. As discussed previously, even most hyper-elites realize the insanity of that position, and cooler heads may prevail. Instead of ruling in hell, elites will become regular members of something that resembles heaven on Earth.

When that elite domino tumbles, what else becomes obsolete? As previously discussed, the reasons for cities to appear were ease of communication, social interaction, and surplus energy delivered to urban environments that allowed for the specialization that led to professions. The energetic exploitation of a hinterland and low energy transportation lanes to deliver it made cities possible. With the ability to travel and communicate anywhere on Earth nearly instantly, and with the myriad problems of urban civilization, who would want to live cheek-by-jowl in cities? With the kinds of lifestyles made possible by those technologies, nobody I know would choose to live in a city. Urban environments would likely become obsolete, or the function of what remained would radically change. There would be places to gather for social events, and there might be something resembling factories, farms, offices, and the like, but there would not be any reason to cram them together, as energy scarcity underlies most urban features (low-energy transportation lanes, high-density dwellings at the end of those lanes). A modern city is essentially a huge, energy-concentrating device, where the energy efficiencies of centralized production, distribution, and consumption are critical features. Those features become meaningless in an FE-based world.

In the site that I published in 2002, a prominent argument was that nearly everything that Americans did was worthless for creating and maintaining the USA’s standard of living. Professions involved in exchange will all become pointless in a world of economic abundance, which include accountants, cashiers, lawyers, police, and soldiers. Entire industries, such as banking and insurance, will evaporate. Politicians will largely cease to exist, especially those on today’s world stage, who are puppets of economic interests. Even seemingly worthwhile professions are largely rackets, such as Western medicine. With most people performing intrinsically worthless activities, what will happen when such professions and industries disappear? Will everybody just lay around, watch TV, and get fat? I doubt it. I do not have enough years in my lifetime to get my life list done. If people think about all the activities that are designed to relieve stress, cope with fear, and the like, so many less obvious activities will also fade to oblivion, and nobody will mourn their passing. In that world, which sources I respect have described in other star systems, time spent “working” is called “joy time,” as beings are fulfilled as they societally contribute in a meaningful way, they do it by using their particular talents, and there is no such thing as drudgery. Also, the idea of competition will likely go the way of the dinosaur, as will the “entertainments” that enthrall so many today, such as sports, competitive games, beauty competitions, and the like. “Entertainment” with winners and losers will no longer be attractive, rooted as it is in ideas of scarcity, and celebrity culture and gossip will also become obsolete. All such primitive behaviors and ideals will fade away, and they will not be missed.

As my fellow travelers and I have pursued free energy and a healed planet and humanity, the nearly universal reactions to our efforts were denial and fear, which often led to us being attacked. Denial is a fear reaction, so we always found the barrier to be fear. If people got past denial and fear of “unexpected outcomes,” then greed usually destroyed the efforts. Greed is the fear of never having enough, so once again, fear defeated the effort. Those reactions all happened long before organized suppression was ever applied. When the agents of organized suppression arrived, they almost effortlessly defeated the efforts by using people’s fear and greed against them. When I saw it happen the first few times, I initially refused to believe it. We made the Global Controllers’ task easy. Their efforts easily turned my own mother against me. The opposite of fear is love, and that has always been the crux of this conundrum, which will be addressed later. This chapter is about what life looks like after we get over the hump; I honor some fears, but they can be addressed.

As previously noted, economic motives have always been at the root of all wars, and Fuller noted the same motivation behind all soldiers, and even one of Hitler’s henchmen observed how any society can be motivated to war by fear, so why would wars break out when everybody lived in abundance? There are some legitimate transition fears, and I advocate a global peacekeeping force, ideally staffed with grandmothers, who would ensure that the transition to a world based on abundance was not marred by warfare. Today, the Global Controllers can detect when anybody accesses the zero-point field, and weaponization of FE technology could probably be detected and just as easily disabled. I would happily deputize grandmothers (and not male-model women such as Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, etc.) to take the toys away from the boys who cannot seem to play nicely, until the utter stupidity of such behavior becomes universally obvious and nobody needs to be reminded anymore. I envision a solar-system-wide government forming, but its only charges would be safety, ensuring that everybody had life’s necessities, and promoting a dynamic unity among all peoples. It would be a government based on love and abundance, not fear and scarcity. That government will not be about amassing power, catering to the economic elites, defending borders, and playing the adolescent games that we see on today’s world stage. Today’s retail political activity would resemble chimpanzee politics from the perspective of that FE-based civilization. There would not be huge punitive legal systems and prisons, but justice and healing would always be the goal. What today are called “criminals” would be recognized as sick people in need of help, not punishment. The most recalcitrant might be sequestered from society, but placed in environments of healing and education, not punishment. Criminal mentalities would not last long, either, nor could they be successfully hidden as they are today. The innumerable secret games being played today will largely vanish, and almost nobody would see the point of playing them. Abundance would make many behaviors called “human nature” today simply vanish.

Other dramatic changes in humanity will happen that may not be obvious at first. Humanity’s races are the result of evolution, where geographic isolation and environmental adaption have led to incipient speciation, and hair, skin, and eye color are superficial changes. All human races can interbreed, and when geographic isolation ends with a humanity that can easily travel throughout the solar system, not only will racism end, but so will race. There will be only one race, probably within a few hundred years after FE appears, and racism is already under siege in nations such as the USA, and racism, along with all such “isms,” always had an economic rationale that elevated one group at the expense of others. All of those scarcity-based systems, judgments, and ideologies will quickly become senseless, just as so many others have during the course of human civilization. Just as races are a product of geographic and genetic isolation that will disappear as the isolation does, humanity will likely use only one language. As with disappearing races, the process of languages disappearing will likely take centuries. Maybe something like Esperanto will rise again, or a lingua franca such as English will persist for a time (and computer-based language translation is increasingly common and sophisticated), but eventually one language will unify humanity. Science has been called a universal language, but the universal conversational language will likely resemble an English/Chinese blend or something similar. All human languages are UP’s languages, so that universal language will be easily learned by all.

Today’s organized religions will all become obsolete, as the roots of religion were based in winning wars, and today’s religions are all priesthood-serving distortions of valid perceptions of spiritual masters. They have all waned in influence with industrialization, and when abundance reigns instead of scarcity, no ideas will be distorted into methods of social control and supporting economic rackets. There will be spiritual practices, but they will not rest on the violence-, fear-, and scarcity-based foundations of today’s religions. Today’s New Age-type religions are usually tired retreads of the same constructions that the original priesthoods built, with male leaders crafting their messages, which often have some validity, into building financial empires, replete with harems and other perquisites.

Darwin began his Origin of the Species with describing the evolutionary effects of domestication. Humans have already created unprecedented evolutionary trends, and a prominent speculation among scientists is that humans have domesticated themselves and genes for the bellicosity of warfare, for instance, may be getting culled from the human gene pool. With industrialization, violence has been proportionally diminished, and may be on its way to dying out. The entire dominance model of human relations will likely become a relic of our primitive heritage.

The human nuclear family was a change from ape social organization, giving more males an opportunity to procreate, but it is also an economic institution, as have been extended families and the like. Family and clan organization began to disappear with the first cities in Sumer. What will happen to family structures with FE and abundance? Bearing children is hard on a woman, and it is difficult to imagine a population explosion with FE and abundance, as women will have better things to do than become baby factories. Maybe the human population will significantly decline in a continuance of today’s demographic transition, but even if it rose, since humanity will not place a burden on Earth’s ecosystems, it would not matter like it does today.

Humans can radically alter the course of life on Earth, even more so than we already have. Artificial selection has proven to be far more powerful than natural selection, and with the human ability to alter its environment, natural selection itself could become largely obsolete where humanity is concerned. I will return to this subject soon, but while those ideas can seem to encourage megalomania, it could also point the way to horizons that we can scarcely imagine, that do not have to become Blade Runner-ish nightmares.

During the history of life on Earth and the human journey, there were many golden ages, where energy was relatively abundant, whether it was new ecological niches with few competitors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14), “virgin” continents awaiting the “settlers,” (1, 2, 3), or the early days of exploiting a new energy source (1, 2, 3, 4), but the good times ended as others arrived to take their share of the energy or the energy source was depleted. If there is more potential energy in one cubic centimeter of “empty” space than scientists think exists in the entire visible universe, when do you think the energy will run out? For all practical human purposes, the energy would be inexhaustible. Michio Kaku has popularized the idea of galactic civilizations ranked on levels of energy usage, and under that scale, humanity has not yet reached the first level. An FE-based civilization would probably rank as a Type 1. I am not too interested in humanity becoming a Type 2 or Type 3 civilization, and maybe none exist in our universe. Those can seem like rather grandiose ideas to today’s humans. Taking care of our own planet and fellow creatures is enough challenge for our species for the foreseeable future. I would happily settle for humans just learning those lessons for the next million years or so, before embarking on anything more ambitious. Humanity is not yet toilet-trained as a species, and reaching that galactically modest level is what the work of FE activists I respect has generally been devoted toward. Anything beyond that will be a bonus and far into the future.

The training that enabled people to perform remote viewings and other psychic feats ruined many scientific careers, as scientists received direct personal experience that the materialistic paradigm that guides mainstream science is false. Brian O’Leary and I had our first remote viewing experiences performing the same exercise in the 1970s. I performed experiments regarding the human ability to generate a subtle energy that prevents rotting, and was able to generate great heat with my hands, which others have developed to far higher levels of mastery. Brian performed similar experiments, and advocated a scientific approach to investigating such phenomena. Nearly all of my fellow travelers in the FE field had some kind of experience like that in their late teens or early twenties. Most were scientists or scientists-in-training. When people have experiences such as those, they will never accept the materialistic assumptions that dominate mainstream science. As noted previously, the giants of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, fully realized the limitations in the orthodox framework and all held “heretical” ideas that could be called mystical. Many organizations have sought to remedy the affliction of mainstream science that views consciousness as a mere epiphenomenon of brain activity. I met Brian at a conference for one such organization. It has been called bridging the gap between science and religion, and other terms. I see it as bringing science and consciousness together. Brian was a speaker at that conference, and his talk’s subject was the need for a new science. Until mainstream science allows consciousness into its paradigm and rejects its materialistic assumptions, it will be playing a small game, as the greatest science of all may be the science of consciousness.

As discussed previously, there is a great deal of evidence, nearly all of it suppressed, that we are not alone in the universe. It is being suppressed for the same reason that FE, antigravity, and myriad other technologies are being suppressed: so the hyper-elites can continue sitting upon their perch atop the global food chain. The issues are deeply related, and either situation breaking out of the organized suppression will likely resolve the other almost instantaneously, and they might be resolved at the same moment. Although the Brookings Institute advised NASA for caution regarding any ET disclosures, the days of a War of the Worlds reaction are long gone. Knowing that we are not alone in the universe, and that our journey may have been significantly influenced by ET visitors (such as the velocity of today’s technological revolution), will change humanity’s self-image and likely the way that we end up interacting with galactic civilizations, but that will all pale beside the economic and social changes that FE, antigravity, and related technologies will initiate. That is all unexplored territory and I, for one, look forward to exploring it.

To revisit the world’s dominant ideologies, they will all become obsolete in a world where abundance reigns, and all abundance notions have to be based on energy abundance above all else. If energy is not abundant, none of the abundance ideas put forth by various visionaries have any hope of coming to fruition.

The ideas presented in this chapter can be seen as vague ideas, if the Fifth Epochal Event happens. I can no more predict the specific outcomes of the Fifth Epochal Event than that English peasant of 1500 could predict the end of slavery, the invention of the Internet, the demographic transition, the liberation of women, Hollywood, nuclear weapons, or rockets to the moon. One phenomenon that happens with all FE visionaries is that we realize that an FE-based future is far beyond our ability to truly imagine, but none of us are unhappy with that situation.

However, for this Epochal Event, unlike the others, we actually have some hints of what might lie ahead, and Star Trek provides one such vision of a potential future. Brian O’Leary went from astronaut to psychonaut, and I have known world-class psychonauts, some of whom visited other dimensions and returned with Earth-shaking inventions (always stolen or suppressed, of course). One set of visions has been a star that I have steered by since the mid-1990s, and is particularly inspiring. The psychonaut visited two future human realities, about 300 years into our future. They were on opposite ends of the fear/love spectrum. Both were technologically advanced compared to today and both had genetic engineering, but the fear-dominated reality made Blade Runner’s Los Angeles seem like Disneyland, while a Disney movie could not begin to depict the love-based one. Visions like that make it clear to me that our future will be what we make it. What we choose to do, today, determines what our tomorrow looks like. The fear-based world was filled with victims, from top to bottom, while those in that other world all acted like true creators, and creators create with love. Love has always been the answer, and learning that lesson may be the reason why we are here, playing this life-on-Earth game.Forgive me if this is crass, brother, but that was like an orgasm - in my mind and heart. I am literally radiating energy (I suspect that my heart chakra's volume knob just got turned to eleven.)

This is going to happen. All of it, and more.

Dennis

Wade Frazier
28th April 2014, 01:16
Hi Dennis:

Radiate away. :)

The point of the essay is to seat that vision within a comprehensive perspective, where both the way that everything is based on energy is understood, including how it has shaped the journey of life on Earth, including humanity’s journey, but also what the potential of FE is. The “funny” thing is that Godzilla understands the potential better than almost anybody, and when he reads that chapter, if he has not already, his reaction will be, “When do you come to the part where I am still in charge?” :)

I have had to mightily resist the urge to rush to the end and cut to the chase, as slings and arrows have been coming my way, and as I have stated plenty, my path has been teaching me patience. :) It took more than 350 pages of preparation to get to that chapter. The next chapter is showing how the choice is ours: the Sixth Mass Extinction, or the Fifth Epochal Event. The final chapter is about what has not worked so far and why, and why I am trying this route, which I have written plenty about on this thread, so it will be another easy chapter to write. I think that Keshe’s messianic announcement while I was drafting that chapter was timely. There are far more pretenders than contenders in this milieu, and we will see how the lamb’s path goes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
28th April 2014, 15:11
Hi:

Well, that was the shortest chapter, as I expected it would be. It is arguable that I did not need the chapter at all, and we will see what my reviewers think.

Now, on to the final chapter, “What Has Not Worked So Far, and What Might.”

Best,

Wade


The Sixth Mass Extinction or the Fifth Epochal Event?

Vast issues can arise when pondering this essay’s subject matter. What is nature? What is called “nature” on Earth is the result of celestial, geophysical, and life processes that have interacted and created the delicate ecosphere that lies on Earth’s thin skin. While Gaian dynamics have been evident in Earth’s history, so have Medean ones, and humans are creating dramatic changes never wrought by any other species. Human have greatly altered Earth’s ecosystems, and are impacting numerous geophysical dynamics. Much of that impact has been for immediate human benefit, but is also causing long-term changes that could be as catastrophic for the ecosphere as the formation of Pangaea ultimately was, and humanity might make Earth uninhabitable by complex life forms, although what would be likelier is “only” wiping out nearly all birds, mammals, and large marine life, perhaps taking humanity with it, and arthropods will rule again.

A related question is, “What is human nature?” A biologist or anthropologist might say that humanity is the result of geophysical and celestial processes that have interacted with evolutionary processes, and with the appearance of humanity, new cognitive and manipulative traits emerged on Earth, which has been reflected in human DNA and developmental processes. They might call those biological features human “nature,” which includes brain and related mental development. The human heritage is reflected in many human traits, going back to the emergence of complex life and arguably earlier, although the development of animal organs, particularly the brain, may be a good place to begin understanding human nature, and as humanity’s evolutionary journey drew closer to the appearance of the genus Homo, more traits of today’s human “nature” could be discerned.

Humans are the large-brained, allegedly sentient species that dominates Earth, and humans have been able to greatly alter evolutionary processes, down to “engineering” the DNA of other organisms. While we have a “nature” and multi-billion year heritage like any organism does, how much have we changed ours, and how much do our natures really matter? Can we consciously change our natures or overcome them? A mystic might say that the ultimate human nature, as well as the nature of everything in the known universe, is divine, and humans, as well as all life, are here to learn to discover that divinity, which is deep within all of us. Human “nature” and our “sentience” are likely keys for determining our immediate and long-term future. Dynamics of our past can draw inferences that we are heading toward the Sixth Mass Extinction that may take us with it. Other dynamics provide reason to believe that humanity will finally figure it out and become a truly sentient species that experiences its Fifth Epochal Event and not only heals as much of its damage inflicted on Earth and itself as it can, but a future that a Disney movie could not begin to portray may await. But unflinchingly facing our past and present, laying aside the myths and self-serving lies, will greatly increase the probability that such a wonderful future can be attained.

A mass extinction began when humans left Africa and may have even begun with ancestors of Homo sapiens, but it accelerated when that founder group of behaviorally modern humans left Africa 60-50 kya. They quickly drove the largest megafauna on three continents to extinction, as well as the arctic mammoths of Eurasia and all other human species. Once the inhabitable continents were filled with that founder group’s descendants, in at least two places and as many as nine, humans began domesticating plants and animals. The mass extinction continued with the Domestication Revolution, but in less spectacular fashion as habitat destruction and the increasing density of human populations became the primary vector of driving other species to extinction, which were often local extinctions. While ancient Egypt and particularly Rome drove north African megafauna to extinction, there were few other notable mass extinctions until Europeans learned to sail the world’s oceans. When they did, the greatest proportional demographic catastrophes since the extinction of all other human species began. Those same three continents earlier robbed of their megafauna were quickly shorn of their human populations and replaced with Europeans in Australia and with Europeans and enslaved Africans in the Americas. In the midst of that unprecedented disaster for Homo sapiens, England began to industrialize. While industrialization raised the human standard of living like never before, as the energy of fossil fuels was exploited on a large scale for the first time, it also enabled greater environmental devastation. The extinction of the passenger pigeon and the near-extinction of the bison, in the midst of history’s most spectacular deforestation, were indicative of the vast damage that industrialized peoples could inflict on Earth’s ecosystems. Industrialization also accelerated Europe’s conquest of the world, and they conquered and subjugated African and Asian peoples, reducing them to effective slavery and further devastating the ecosystems.

Today, environmental devastation is primarily inflicted by industrial nations as their mines scar the lands and they pour industrial pollutants into land, sea, and air, including the result of energy disasters such as the Gulf Oil Spill of 2010 and the Fukushima nuclear disaster of 2011, following the Chernobyl meltdown of 1986, all of which were subjected to cover-up activities by those responsible, as well as abetted by international interests trying to protect their public image. Similar to the “fluoride is good for you” canard concocted by industrial interests, there has been a great deal of “radiation is benign or even good for you” propaganda flowing, particularly in the Fukushima disaster’s wake, but research has shown that all radiation is harmful, even far below levels that the authorities have said is “safe.” The work of an early nuclear propaganda dissident has unfortunately been vindicated. Some of the very same interests behind the “fluoride is good for you” propaganda were behind the “radiation is benign or good for you” lies. Those fabrications likely originated in and were promoted by the corporate/national-interest level, which lies below the Global Controller level.

Industrialized nations nearly finished off the whales, and are greatly responsible for deforesting Earth, although nations such as Japan have been exporting the devastation, as foreign forests are razed and shipped to Japan, while Japan treats its forests as sacred groves. But also, the poor in former colonial nations have been pushed to ecosystem margins. The prime arable land is usually owned by local oligarchs or foreign corporations, often raising crops for export to the industrialized nations. Guatemala and much of Central America comprise a pertinent example, while the peasants farm marginal lands, often hillsides, which not only devastate the last refuges of species driven into the hills, but it also erodes the hillsides, leaving behind moonscapes, as happened in the Old World long ago. Those dynamics, particularly habitat destruction, are largely behind today’s accelerating Sixth Mass Extinction, also called the Holocene Extinction, but which also extends back for perhaps a million years, not just since the ice sheets melted in this latest interglacial interval. The five other major mass extinctions reached 70% of more global species going extinct, and a recent estimate has 50% being reached by 2100 for the human-caused extinction. Other estimates have that level reached as early as my lifetime, while others have it being reached in a slightly longer timeframe. The current extinction rate is thought to be higher than those of all previous extinction events other than the one that wiped out the dinosaurs, and humanity “achieving” Permian levels of extinction or even exceeding it is not out of the question. Biologists and climate scientists are horrified, and the global propaganda machine chugs along, making everything seem normal, and “scientists” in their pay work long and hard to downplay pollution, extinction, health catastrophes, genocide, and the rest, in a kind of Potemkin Earth strategy, gleaning profits until the end.

On numerous fronts, humanity is staring into the abyss, primarily due to our energy practices. Will World War III, fighting over the remaining high-EORI oil, be an outcome? One of Einstein’s most famous attributed quotes was, “I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” Maybe some of us survive that holocaust, where the living envy the dead. Maybe we avoid fighting over the hydrocarbons, but the oceans rise as climate changes more dramatically and billions are displaced, which triggers global famine and a different kind of World War III, as nations fight over food (and maybe water), not oil. Merely contemplating such scenarios can drive people to drink and worse. Humanity stands on the chasm’s edge today, and the vast majority of people simply do not know or care, as their immediate self-interest marks the limit of their awareness. It has always been this way, when people are just trying to survive and deaden the pain of their existences.

The truly bizarre part of the FE conundrum, as I have called it, is that when people such as Brian O’Leary tried to play the Paul Revere of FE and awaken his “Earth-saving” colleagues to the potential of FE, their reactions were so uniformly dismissive of FE, and even frightened and offended by such an idea, that Brian began to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species. I sadly understood his query. It is a fair question, and forms the crux of the FE conundrum.

The previous chapter’s vision requires FE to manifest in the public arena and become used by all of humanity, and quickly. If FE does not manifest, none of those visions are feasible, as FE will necessarily form their foundation, just as humanity’s energy practices have defined every epoch of the human past. Abundant, harmless energy production has never been experienced on Earth before, other than in the GCs’ enclaves, and none of the so-called energy solutions proposed by various parties, from Peak Oilers to environmentalists, have any chance of being both clean and abundant. The “solutions” that they propose are all based on austerity, which Fuller said has never worked and never will. So-called environmentalists nearly universally treat FE and abundance as the enemy, and I initially could not believe what I was seeing. When I later traded notes with fellow travelers, I discovered that to be the universal reaction of environmentalists, going back to the 1970s. After many years of looking for various groups to ally with, I had to reluctantly conclude that none exist. There is no group on Earth today, outside of the small FE cottage industry, which gives FE any credence at all, as those groups all do the GCs’ work for them. The greatest triumph of the GCs is making FE and a healed humanity and planet unimaginable, and humanity has readily acquiesced to the conditioning, marching toward the cliff like a great lemming stampede.

In 1969, Fuller published Utopia or Oblivion, which helped crystallize my personal paradigm when I read it in 2003. Before reading Fuller, I was a “seat-of-the-britches” comprehensivist who had never heard of comprehensivists. The title of Fuller’s work could have well been, “The Fifth Epochal Event or the Sixth Mass Extinction (that takes humanity with it).”

Ever since Tesla began building his tower, there have been many thousands of attempts to produce FE. Tesla’s tower was not initially intended to tap the zero-point field, but take advantage of the electric potential between Earth’s upper atmosphere and crust, and other technologies have accessed that potential energy. Some have tried to “defeat” the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as our efforts arguably attempted in the 1980s, which some scientists that I respected thought was possible. But the zero-point field is where the abundant and clean energy to initiate the Fifth Epochal Event will come from, and many have accessed it. When scientists and inventors have extracted energy from the zero-point field, they then received the Global Controller’s attention, and the suppression of such technologies has become a science during the past century. As I will soon discuss, I became aware of many avenues that have been attempted, and all have been miserable failures, with the “lucky” aspirants receiving the “Golden Handcuffs” of being bought out, with their technology being either shelved or clandestinely developed. I am constantly made aware of the latest FE aspirants’ efforts, who are almost always an inventors with dreams of greed, delusions of grandeur, potentially fatal naïveté, or strange combinations of all three afflictions, and “supporters” who will quickly betray them to the highest bidder, and nobody’s pockets are as deep as the GCs’. This essay’s final chapter will discuss what has not worked and what I no longer have any interest in, and why my intended approach will be something different than anything tried before, as far as I know. To a great degree, I am standing on the shoulders of Fuller and my professional ancestors in the FE field, many of whom were genuinely well-intended but were understandably unaware of how the system really worked. They usually found out the hard way, as I did. Probably the primary reason why I am able to do this work is that I was a teenager when my energy dreams began and somehow survived my adventures so that by age 30 I was a grizzled veteran. When older FE aspirants had their adventures, for those who survived them, they were usually crippled by their traumas. I was young enough to survive my traumas, but I will always be recovering from them.

So, my fellow humans, will we experience the Sixth Mass Extinction, that might take us with it, or will humanity experience its Fifth Epochal Event? The choice has always been ours, and we are quickly reaching the point where it will likely be one or the other, with little feasible middle ground. Fuller stated that if humanity had not achieved the Fifth Epochal Event by the 1980s, the probability of humanity surviving its self-made catastrophe would be less than 50%. Here we are, three decades later, and Fuller may still be right, but time is very short. Impatience is my Achilles heel, and forty years of this pursuit as of 2014 has been teaching it to me, but the window of opportunity to avert a global calamity is closing, and if humanity does not begin to embrace the direction of the Fifth Epochal Event in my lifetime, then Fuller might be accused of being overly optimistic, if there is anybody left to accuse him.

Wade Frazier
29th April 2014, 04:09
Hi:

Briefly, before I go to bed. I am constantly receiving emails on the latest FE “breakthrough,” where the inventors play the “secret sauce” proprietary game, go for patents, and so on. If anybody is successful doing that, it will only because they were allowed to. Any apparent success will have nothing to do with the virtue of the aspirant, but something happening at G’s level to allow it. I am not counting on it, however, and want nothing to do with such approaches. Been there, done that.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
29th April 2014, 13:01
Hi:

As I write this final chapter, I am inserting concepts into the essay that I have had on my list of things to do. Here is what I scattered across the essay this morning.

The obsession on prices and money has also promoted an egocentric view of economic reality. Whenever people think of economics today, they generally only think in terms of money, as that is the medium of exchange by which individuals currently acquire the food, goods, and services that make their modern lives possible. Consequently, the real economy, which runs on matter and energy, not money, tends to becomes demoted and ignored. The financial economy is not real, but is an elaborate accounting fiction subject to great manipulation. Theorists such as Marx put money in its proper place, as only accounting. Money-based economics is what I called the egocentric economy, where the focus is on money and greed, where everybody’s primary question is “What is in it for me?” That view is also disconnected from reality.

And…

Those all-too-rare economists challenging neoclassical economics from a scientific perspective focus on energy above all else, and the labor and technological capital (real capital, not the accounting claim on it that capitalists have) that use that energy to turn material resources into useful products and services. They focus on the real economy and actual human benefit, in what I call the anthropocentric economy. American Indians were astounded by the crazed European attitude, as gold rushes, genocide, and deforestation swept across the lands. The Spanish obsession with gold was evident as early as the second day of Columbus’s “discovery” of the Western Hemisphere. When the invaders finally found a civilization with ample gold a generation later, the Aztecs described the Spaniards in their throes of gold lust as “monkeys” and “pigs.” With the awesome cruelties subsequently inflicted on the natives, the priest Las Casas summarized the Spanish attitude with, “I say that they do not want to kill them directly, from the hate they bear them; they kill them because they want to be rich and have much gold, which is their whole aim, through the toil and sweat of the afflicted and unhappy.” That century-long gold rush bankrupted Spain. Recently, Canadian Indians stated, “


“Canada, the most affluent of countries, operates on a depletion economy which leaves destruction in its wake. Your people are driven by a terrible sense of deficiency. When the last tree is cut, the last fish is caught, and the last river is polluted; when to breathe the air is sickening, you will realize, too late, that wealth is not in bank accounts and that you can’t eat money.”


That “pig” quote I produced more fully in a note that reads:

“The Spaniards’ faces grinned: they were delighted, they were overjoyed. They snatched up the gold like monkeys…They were swollen with greed; they were ravenous; they hungered for that gold like wild pigs.”

And in that “vision” chapter:

Numbers and measurement will still exist, but egocentric economics that focuses on money and self-interest to the exclusion of all else will disappear, as will anthropocentric economics, where ecosystem health is only seen in terms of how it can support human welfare. The economic view that will supersede those frameworks is what I call life-centric or soul-centric, and it measures and values the wellbeing of all life on Earth, not just human welfare.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
29th April 2014, 15:44
Hi:

The essay’s final chapter will be the most familiar one to this thread's readers, which starts like the below. You can all imagine where it is heading. :) But I also think that there will be new information in it. I plan to finish that chapter this week.

Best,

Wade


What Has Not Worked So Far, and What Might

Many thousands of attempts have been made to develop and bring disruptive energy technology to the public, up to and including FE. All efforts have failed, and a brief chronicling of my adventures, as well as Dennis Lee’s, who was my partner during my days of active pursuit of FE, presents support for why I believe that I can competently write about this issue. Our journeys into alternative and eventually free energy began at about the same time: during the USA’s first energy crisis. Mine began because my first professional mentor invented what was hailed as the world’s best engine for powering an automobile, which he invented just before the crisis, and which caused great commotion within the federal government. During the furor, I had my mystical awakening, spent two months in Europe absorbing its art and culture, and began dreaming of changing the energy industry. Dennis is twelve years older than me, and as I was dreaming of changing the energy industry, he was having his first company destroyed in the mayhem of the 1973-1974 energy crisis. Brian O’Leary’s journey into alternative energy also began around the same time, as he engaged in Capitol Hill activism and advised presidential candidates.

Dennis was raised as a poor rural white of Scots-Irish heritage, growing up as a migrant farm worker, when white people still did that in the USA. He left home at age 13 because his family could no longer afford to feed him, and his journey took him to Vietnam in 1968, as a medic who saw combat. Not long after his Vietnam experience, he had his mystical awakening in an event far more dramatic than mine, when he heard a voice in his head that he calls “God.” Several years later, as I had my first existential crisis and prayed for guidance, I too heard a voice, which changed my studies from science to business. Several years after that, I prayed for guidance for the second and so far last time in my life. The voice again responded and suggested that I move far away, and I immediately landed in the midst of Dennis’s company. I heard from that voice one more time, that time unbidden, and do not want to hear from it anymore. I have no idea who or what the voice was, but it was certainly not my conscious mind. Even though I have not asked for that voice again, during the time spent writing this essay, I can tell that my “friends” have been orchestrating events around me once again. The events that they seem to engineer are not uniformly unpleasant, but they also never let me off the hook. They challenge me in uncomfortable ways, but it seems to come with the territory. Being “picked” for duty like that might seem an honor, and I cannot regret my journey, but those of us on these kinds of “missions” never have it easy, and a big part of us would rather be doing something else, but our consciences will not let us. While I have never heard of any other FE attempts having such preposterous levels of otherworldly “intervention,” efforts like ours have often been accompanied by similar events. We all lose any beliefs that we might have had in coincidence.

All of those hard-to-believe events aside, I became a student of genius, learning at my first professional mentor’s knee, and while it was the great integrity that Dennis displayed as his Seattle company was being destroyed that sold me on him (as well as that voice leading me to him), when I chased him to Boston to help rebuild his effort, it quickly became evident that I was learning from another world-class genius, and I avidly studied his efforts. He probably did his most interesting work before I met him. He invented the energy industry’s first shared savings program, and his marketing programs were awe-inspiring in their ingenuity. Dennis was an untrained businessman, but his ability to erect a disruptive energy technology company with no capital and create the entire process, from developing the technology, building it, and marketing it, is the best that I have ever seen or heard of, and his public image rarely even touched upon his unparalleled talent in that area. Those abilities paled beside his other qualifications, which nobody else on Earth that I know of has matched. That voice knew what it was doing in leading me to Dennis, but being Indiana Jones’s sidekick was not an easy ride, and I have generally rejected Dennis’s continual entreaties to rejoin him after I helped bust him out of jail. Even as I write this, the story seems ridiculously fanciful, but it all happened and more, with connections and events I am not at liberty to publicly disclose that makes Indiana Jones’s journey look like Walter Mitty’s. As dramatic as those events were, our focus was always on bringing FE to the world.

In Boston, we were still recovering from our Seattle effort when we were offered $10 million for Dennis’s naïve idea for making FE. A year later, just before we were wiped out, Dennis was offered about $1 billion to fold our operation, delivered by a CIA man who said that he represented “European interests.” Soon after Dennis rejected the offer, our nightmare truly began, and when the dust settled a couple of years later, my life was shattered and I was radicalized. I would never see the world the same way again, and my site and this essay are the fruit of long years of study. I had subsequent adventures that were milder, even though I risked prison again with Dennis, but I have had too much adventure and I am trying to live a fairly quiet life anymore. The year after leaving my home town, where my life was wrecked, I met Brian and eventually carried his spears, and they were fortunately much lighter than Dennis’s. I always respected Dennis and Brian the most in the field, and I valued their integrity above all else. Their great hearts attracted me to them, not their talent, genius, or fame. I have written plenty about my days with Dennis and Brian, and interested readers can discover more if they wish. I hope to convey what the learning experience of carrying their spears was like. My learning curve with Dennis was insanely steep and comprised the kind of education that few survive for long. While my education with Brian was far gentler, I learned important lessons from him. If not for my adventures, I would likely not have much worth saying. Even though much of this essay “merely” deals with mainstream science theory and data, my radicalized perspective is responsible for how I approached the issues. This essay is certainly not the work of a professional scientist or economist.

As I stepped back periodically, during the quiet times, I reflected on what we were experiencing and what our fellow travelers reported, and my views gradually changed. My initial orientation was the inventor’s approach, and that I got it the same year as my mystical awakening was likely significant for evolving my current perspective. That voice suggested that I study business, and I began developing the businessman’s perspective long before I met Dennis. My years with Dennis were about trying to make those teenage dreams a reality. I soon realized that my first mentor’s attitude misled me about inventors in general. Nearly all inventors invent to get rich and famous, not to help the world. I have still never met an altruistic inventor. I soon saw many unethical and criminal acts engaged in by those involved in Dennis’s ventures. When I told Dennis how shocking it was to see, Dennis told me to join the club. Witnessing the orgies of fear and greed that Dennis’s associates nearly always engaged in was a critical aspect of my awakening process, but what may have been more “fascinating” was how easily the Global Controllers’ agents played Dennis’s associates like virtuoso violinists, as they used everybody’s fear and greed to push the effort into self-destruction. After a few episodes of watching likely provocateurs in action, what initially stunned me was how easily people fell under their spell, and people who were far older and supposedly more worldly than I was. Bill the BPA Hit Man was definitely a professional provocateur, Mr. Texas was almost certainly one, and Mr. Deputy was also one, although people like them rarely know exactly who they really work for, nor do they care, as long as they are handsomely compensated. I had difficultly believing that “smart” people could be so stupid to be manipulate that way, but I soon understood that I was witnessing them surpass the limits of their integrity. Those affable and talented psychopaths on the Global Controllers’ payroll often played a fake angel game to get people to betray us. After several years of observing such events, seeing people I had known for nearly my entire life act dishonorably, naïvely, cowardly, and even criminally, I learned my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity. The reason why we do not have FE and a healed planet today is because of the general population’s low integrity. I resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it pounded into my head in no uncertain terms. Today’s situation has almost nothing to do with the Global Controllers and their minions. Almost nobody wants to hear that sobering truth, however, which is also part of the problem. Denial of how the world really works will not help for manifesting FE and a healed planet and humanity. The enemy is us, and always has been.

I watched Dennis try every approach that he could think of, from businesses to non-profits to the “patriot” approach and more. Dennis is a literalist Christian, and has tried the religion route several times, which always ended in disaster, along with every other approach, and his openly professed religious fanaticism understandably dissuaded many from becoming involved with our efforts. I was always with Dennis in spite of his religious views, not because of them. All FE aspirants that I knew of had personal foibles, including me, which comes with being human. Brian readily admitted that his astronaut and “bright lights” days tended to inflate his ego, and he had his Lapis Pig and Einstein hair, while the Disclosure Project’s founder took the über-warrior approach after his team was killed off soon after those Congressional hearings. I am a semi-nerd who can become overemotional, and we are/were all citizens of history’s most arrogant nation, and we were almost all geniuses, which presented all of us challenges in humility. I have watched FE activists disappear down the mystical rabbit hole and fall into the many pitfalls that await the newcomer. A week before I drafted this essay’s final chapter, a relatively new FE hopeful claimed that he was The Second Coming, and he is not the first one to do that. The perfect candidate to lead an FE effort likely does not exist, but personal integrity is the quality that I value above all others. If a person does not have a sufficient store to begin with, the rest does not matter. The FE pursuit by people of low integrity does not have a prayer of success for navigating the innumerable hazards that await the candidate. There are far more pretenders than contenders in the field, and the promise and perils of the FE pursuit are too overwhelming for most people to navigate for even five minutes.

More than thirty years after I began dreaming of changing the energy industry, I published a framework to organize the thousands of reactions to the idea of FE that I have witnessed, and I will refer to it for the remainder of this essay. Several years after publishing that framework, I have yet to find a reaction that does not fit fairly well into that framework’s categories.

Wade Frazier
29th April 2014, 22:27
Hi:

This is all for today, I think, as it is time for chores. Again, this will seem very familiar to readers of this thread. I am going to get this baby done this week! :) It has been nearly a year in process, after several years of studying for it. I am getting to finish this on my terms, which is an incredibly satisfying feeling.

Off to chores.

Best,

Wade

The first level of awareness of FE is no awareness at all. Dennis spoke on hundreds of talk radio shows in the early 1990s between his jail and prison stints, mounted national ad campaigns, barnstormed the USA repeatedly, and engaged in many other activities. There have been several national TV shows about Dennis, but they were all smear jobs, as nearly all media coverage was, often featuring a “skeptic” who made up the lies about Dennis as he went, and concocted new lies when the old ones were exposed. Some may argue that any awareness is better than none at all, but I am not so sure. Whether it is good or bad attention, many millions of Americans have at least heard of FE, probably mainly because of Dennis, but even the movie The Incredibles featured zero-point energy. It is safe to say that many Americans, maybe even more than half, have at least heard of FE in some way. Some have simply not heard of it, others would not care even if they heard of it, and even most people who heard of it probably regard it as a cartoon fantasy, and that is just how the Global Controllers like it. Their goal is to keep as large a fraction of the population at that level of awareness as possible. If the herd is not even restless or has any idea in what direction freedom might lie, it is exceedingly easy to manage.

Then there is the fraction of the population that has heard of FE and consciously dealt with the idea as a real possibility, and by far the most common reaction is to use their ideologies of choice to quickly dismiss the possibility. Appeals to nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are the most common I have seen, and are reflexive actions, where the idea leaves their awareness almost as fast as it arrived. Those who never heard of FE and those who immediately dismiss it with reflexive reactions comprise more than 99% of today’s global and Western population.

Some are more thoughtful, who donate to seemingly worthy causes and genuinely care about what is happening in the world, at least enough to not reflexively dismiss FE. When they hear of FE, they may ask their scientist relatives and associates what they know about it, they might contact their favorite environmental organization, and the like. The reply is that FE is “impossible” or would be used to destroy the planet through either warfare or environmental destruction, and they are advised to look elsewhere for solutions to the world’s problems, and they dutifully drop the subject. They trust those authority figures, and generally fall into the political liberal category, probably listen to NPR and watch PBS and the BBC, and follow the news on some “progressive” sites.

Those levels of awareness have either no knowledge or gain only a superficial understanding of the issues before succumbing to their conditioning and trusting the various authorities that they invested their faith in. The next level of denial is the most intelligent one and has recognized experts in their fields in it, and includes most scientists and academics. They are often those whom those thoughtful progressives asked for their opinion on FE. Their includes invoking the “laws of physics” and other reasons why FE is impossible and they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” Many breakthroughs in science and technology were often called “impossible,” even after they were achieved, with the reception afforded the Wright brothers actually open-minded compared to the how the idea of FE is received today in such circles. Brian beseeched his peers for several years to simply entertain the idea of FE. He had access that I never will, and interacted with colleagues at the very top of world-class scientific, academic, and environmental organizations. Only after experiencing the often-violent reactions of denial from that group did Brian begin to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species. I also beat my head against those walls for many years, and their naïveté and circular reasoning were probably the most dismaying aspects of their responses, as they came from people who supposedly knew something about how the world worked and were intelligent. When I approached one academic who at least mentioned FE as a possibility, and who cited situations that I had been involved with, his reaction was stunning. That group, as a whole, might be the last to accept FE’s reality, which is similar to what the Brookings Institute warned NASA about regarding the UFO/ET issue.

For those who at least admit that FE is possible, probably the most common response is that they want an FE device to power their home, or one to study in their laboratory. I want one too, and such responses are no help at all for making FE happen. Who would not want a quadrillion dollar technology delivered to their home? Those were the equivalents of Dennis’s customers under his shared savings programs. Their “skin in the game” was waiting for a miraculous and world-shaking technology to be delivered to their homes, preferably for free.

Probably the next most common reaction for those not denying that FE is possible is those who fear FE (they may outnumber those who will gladly accept FE delivered to their homes and labs). Their fears are usually stated to be around weaponizing FE or using it to destroy Earth’s remaining ecosystems. However, that reaction seemed to camouflage other, deeper fears. I have never succeeded in engaging such people in rational conversation regarding those fears. I came to suspect that they really feared abundance, and seemed addicted to scarcity. They built their entire lives around surviving in a world of scarcity, and saw abundance as a threat to their existence. Their reaction is similar to how the Global Controllers have reacted over the generations, and for similar reasons.

Those various reactions are not mutually exclusive, as some people will react with combinations of them, and the fear of FE is often espoused by those who have sophisticated objections to the idea of FE, and their reaction is along the lines of: “FE is impossible, thankfully, because if we had it, we would only destroy ourselves and the planet with it.”

The people in those previously mentioned categories comprise around 99.99% of humanity at this time. The next levels of my framework describe people who are actually trying to do something about the situation, and they all have my respect, even if their motivation may be to get rich and famous and other self-serving motivations, or they are naïve. Everybody that I respect in this field began their journeys naively. Naïveté is no crime, and I greatly respect people who lost their naïveté honestly, usually by trying to make the world a better place. I lost mine the hard way. However, naïveté is dangerous in this field, and I am attempting to mount an effort where naïveté will be less hazardous for its participants, although it will still need to be shed.

Wade Frazier
30th April 2014, 15:46
Hi:

I am going hiking in a few minutes, but here is what I banged out this morning. This chapter will likely receive more editorial attention from me than any other, so this is very embryonic stuff.

Best,

Wade

Those levels of awareness have either no knowledge or gain only a superficial understanding of the issues before succumbing to their conditioning and trusting the various authorities that they invested their faith in. The next level of denial is the most intelligent one and has recognized experts in their fields in it, and includes most scientists and academics. They are often those whom those thoughtful progressives asked for their opinion on FE. Their includes invoking the “laws of physics” and other reasons why FE is impossible and they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” Many breakthroughs in science and technology were often called “impossible,” even after they were achieved, with the reception afforded the Wright brothers actually open-minded compared to the how the idea of FE is received today in such circles. Brian beseeched his peers for several years to simply entertain the idea of FE. He had access that I never will, and interacted with colleagues at the very top of world-class scientific, academic, and environmental organizations. Only after experiencing the often-violent reactions of denial from that group did Brian begin to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species. I also beat my head against those walls for many years, and their naïveté and circular reasoning were probably the most dismaying aspects of their responses, as they came from people who supposedly knew something about how the world worked and were intelligent. When I approached one academic who at least mentioned FE as a possibility, and who cited situations that I had been involved with, his reaction was stunning. That group, as a whole, might be the last to accept FE’s reality, which is similar to what the Brookings Institute warned NASA about regarding the UFO/ET issue.

For those who at least admit that FE is possible, probably the most common response is that they want an FE device to power their home, or one to study in their laboratory. I want one too, and such responses are no help at all for making FE happen. Who would not want a quadrillion dollar technology delivered to their home? Those were the equivalents of Dennis’s customers under his shared savings programs. Their “skin in the game” was waiting for a miraculous and world-shaking technology to be delivered to their homes, preferably for free.

Probably the next most common reaction for those not denying that FE is possible is those who fear FE (they may outnumber those who will gladly accept FE delivered to their homes and labs). Their fears are usually stated to be around weaponizing FE or using it to destroy Earth’s remaining ecosystems. However, that reaction seemed to camouflage other, deeper fears. I have never succeeded in engaging such people in rational conversation regarding those fears. I came to suspect that they really feared abundance, and seemed addicted to scarcity. They built their entire lives around surviving in a world of scarcity, and saw abundance as a threat to their existence. Their reaction is similar to how the Global Controllers have reacted over the generations, and for similar reasons.

Those various reactions are not mutually exclusive, as some people will react with combinations of them, and the fear of FE is often espoused by those who have sophisticated objections to the idea of FE, and their reaction is along the lines of: “FE is impossible, thankfully, because if we had it, we would only destroy ourselves and the planet with it.”

The people in those previously mentioned categories comprise around 99.99% of humanity at this time. The next levels of my framework describe people who are actually trying to do something about the situation, and they all have my respect, even if their motivation may be to get rich and famous and other self-serving motivations, or they are naïve. Everybody that I respect in this field began their journeys naively. Naïveté is no crime, and I greatly respect people who lost their naïveté honestly, usually by trying to make the world a better place. I lost mine the hard way. However, naïveté is dangerous in this field, and I am attempting to mount an effort where naïveté will be less hazardous for its participants, although it will still need to be shed.

In the awareness level of people doing something or planning to, is the naïve level of thinking that the energy industry will welcome innovative technology, and that organized suppression does not exist. This plays into the capitalist canard that the world is constantly seeking the better mousetrap. Some people are looking, but not to bring them to market, but instead to ensure that they never do. Wiping out the competition is the essence of capitalism. After having his companies stolen many times, surviving Mafia hit attempts (1, 2) and the like, Dennis believed the electric companies’ propaganda in Washington State in the wake of the biggest municipal bond default in U.S. history to that time. He devoted great effort toward interesting the electric companies in the kind of conservation equipment that their full-page ads stated that they desperately needed, thinking that he would get a tickertape parade. In the midst of trying to interest the electric companies, an anonymous party began wrecking his business relationships, and just as he entered into a large deal with a finance company, the electric companies unmasked themselves and went public in their attacks on Dennis’s company. Among the many attacks that came simultaneously from Washington State’s power structure, a professional provocateur with fake alternative energy credentials infiltrated Dennis’s company and was subsequently responsible for the death of one of Dennis’s employees, which was Dennis’s radicalizing moment in his energy adventures. Sparky Sweet, a career scientist at General Electric, also believed the propaganda and believed that his solid state FE device would be welcomed by the energy industry. He mailed working prototypes to the big energy institutions, expecting a tickertape parade. The opposite happened, with shadowy interests destroying his business deals, similar to Dennis’s experience. Sparky did not take the hint and kept trying, which led to death threats. After their final threats, Sparky fled into hiding, where Brian visited him, and Sparky died the next week of a “heart attack.” Dying that way is common among FE contenders who play at the levels that Sparky did. Dennis, Sparky, and many others like them lost their naïveté the hard way, but the field has been filled with newcomers who deny the reality of organized suppression as they charge forth with visions of riches and fame. It is perhaps the most common level of awareness where FE newcomers will be found. Most never develop anything worth suppressing, so will never know any differently, and will enter and leave the field with that naïve level of awareness, which was once the most common one in the field. However, with enough people trying and either living to tell the tale or others chronicling all of their dire fates that often included untimely deaths, and the Internet spreading information like never before, few FE newcomers have little excuse for being unaware of the fates of their professional ancestors.

The next level of awareness might be more dangerous than the previous one, where FE newcomers realize that there is organized suppression, but they think that they are clever enough, lucky enough, or have some other unique quality that will allow them to avoid the suppression, usually by playing secrecy games. One fellow traveler invented an FE prototype in a nuclear laboratory and was fired the next day. He was the same age as me when I began my baptism of fire in Los Angeles to begin my career, and he persisted, which led to more rigorous attention. He then tried the “sneak past them” approach, to be rudely disabused of his idea. Years later, he talked to fellow travelers and began understanding the magnitude of what he stumbled into. He realized that he was like a kindergartener that ran onto the field in an NFL game, thinking that he could play with the big boys. Today’s FE newcomers often begin in this level, and I hear no end of plans to sneak past the organized suppression, run past it so fast that the suppressors will not know what hit them, and many other adolescent fantasies. Those plans are probably the delusions that I see the most often anymore, and are similar to 18-year-old boys pining to prove their manhood on the battlefield.

The next level of awareness might be the most common among people progressing beyond denial of FE’s possibility or existence. They believe that the situation is hopeless and that there is no point in even trying. They are often those building bunkers to survive in when civilization collapses. I have some respect for that position, but it certainly will not help solve humanity’s problems or help the Fifth Epochal Event manifest. Nobody that I respect in the FE field ever felt hopeless. We all began our journeys naively, but we never conceded defeat. When the night was the darkest during my journey, then the miracle happened, so admitting defeat before even beginning sure does not seem very productive or even realistic, and may lead to dysfunctional coping behaviors and suicidal tendencies.

The next level of awareness is similar to those fantasies that organized suppression can be avoided. The people in this category are almost all men, and men comprise more than 90% of the FE field today, which is one of its problems. The people at this level of awareness believe that they can defeat the Global Controllers in battle, expose them, and other silly ideas, similar to that fresh meat hankering for the battlefield. I call them the Young Warriors, and when they arrive with their armor and weapons, the only outcome that you can guarantee is that when those weapons get used, they will likely be used on you, or the Young Warriors use them on each other, as the Global Controllers look on in amusement. The only warriors of any potential benefit to an FE effort have abandoned coercion and adopted persuasion, usually because they have experienced enough battles and discovered the utter futility of coercion.

The next level of awareness is where Dennis, Brian, and I spent many years, and Dennis and Brian largely stayed at that level while I finally had to admit that it would not work, which led to my current strategy. That level is the mass movement mentality. Dennis and Brian drank deeply at the well of their nationalist indoctrination, as have others with my great respect, as they almost all began their journeys as overgrown Boy Scouts. Dennis tried forming movements around Christian ideology early in his journey, and even tried it recently. He also tried the “patriot” approach, and almost all his efforts either involved risk-free (to the customer) marketing plans, business opportunities, or both. Dennis appealed to all three of the most prominent population management ideologies in the USA to attract interest in and involvement with his efforts. I helped Brian found a non-profit mass movement to raise awareness of FE, and it was the last time that I ever will try the mass movement approach. I found that mass movements, by their very nature, appeal to lowest-common-denominator beliefs to form movement “cohesion.” Unfortunately, those beliefs are usually false, as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are built on lies, half-truths, and self-serving myths. Nothing resembling enlightenment comes from such ideologies, and I came to believe that enlightenment is the missing ingredient, and the necessary prerequisite for enlightenment is a caring heart. Without that caring heart, the rest will not matter. When I lived with Dennis in Boston, during my naïve days, when I was also mildly susceptible to delusions of grandeur, Dennis said that “the people” innately cared, but had nothing worth caring about, which was why they danced to the tune of the indoctrination and conditioning coming from The Establishment. With little other frame of reference yet, I believed Dennis. I had my naïveté harshly purged during the next few years and received my life’s primary lesson. A decade later, Dennis finally coaxed me into working with him again, which did not last long and I nearly went to prison for my trouble, as the Global Controllers raised the game to a new level of sophistication. When I was with Dennis that time, he admitted that almost nobody really cared, but he was sifting through the mine tailings of humanity, looking for gold nuggets. Mr. Professor and his wife were two of the three that he said he found, with me being the other (and Dennis’s wife, whose journey has been more difficult than Dennis’s in ways). While that may seem a great honor, it is actually one of the loneliest feelings in the world, and a reason why humanity’s prospects may be dim indeed. But I have not given up, and this essay will form a cornerstone of what may be my final effort to help right the global ship.

There is another level worth mentioning, where the aspirant is overwhelmed with delusions of grandeur, believing himself to be the messiah, or planning to become the Bill Gates of FE, and even billionaires are susceptible to that delusion, as they play their games of fake philanthropy and insatiable greed.

Only after many years of carrying spears for Dennis and Brian and trying out my own efforts did I arrive at my current strategy, which has not been tried before that I know of. It is the enlightenment route to FE. I do not claim to be all that enlightened or saintly, but striving for those goals is where the key to helping FE manifest in public may lie. Many inventors have publicly demonstrated working FE prototypes, but they were all silenced or otherwise removed from the scene, and violently often enough.

Wade Frazier
30th April 2014, 22:40
Hi:

For Limor’s benefit ( :) ), I am attaching two pics taken this week so far from my hikes. My journey has provided plenty of compensation. I can’t complain.

Wade

Dennis Leahy
1st May 2014, 02:35
Hikers earn incredible vistas. Oh sure, there are some you can drive a Winnebago to, pull over, set down your bag of cheetos, and see... but hikers see 10,000 times more and more diversity and more wildlife and less people!

Dennis

Wade Frazier
1st May 2014, 02:48
Hi Dennis:

I am going back to the corporate world soon and will be a weekend warrior again, but it has been nice to decide to hike while the weather is nice. On today’s hike, we encountered one man and his dog, and the one last Sunday afternoon, I think I might have seen one couple. And those are hikes in my backyard. When I was younger and led forty milers deep into the wilderness, we would not see anybody for days. That kind of “ownership” can be addictive. :)

Growing up, my family had a camper and trailer, and once I was introduced to backpacking and hiking, I never looked back. It is big part of why I live here.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
1st May 2014, 15:37
Hi:

As I near the end of drafting this essay, and my pals can beat on it for a couple of months, I am tidying up the essay, reducing redundancy, standardizing it, and yesterday an Avalon lurker suggested that I make an executive summary of my essay. I have done it before:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#summary

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm#summary

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#introduction

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/skeptic.htm

and it is a good idea, and this morning I wrote an essay summary that also stated the purpose behind the essay. It will replace the essay’s previous “purpose” section. Below is what I just banged out this morning.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade


Summary and Purpose

I was born in 1958, NASA recruited my father to work in Mission Control during the Space Race, and I was trained from childhood to be a scientist. My first professional mentor invented like Tesla did, and among his many inventions was an engine soon hailed by a federal study as the world’s most promising alternative to the internal combustion engine. In 1974, as that engine created a stir in the USA’s federal government, I began dreaming of changing the energy industry. That same year, I had my cultural and mystical awakenings. During my second year of college, I had my first existential crisis, and a paranormal event changed my studies from science to business. I still held my energy dreams, however, and eight years after that first paranormal event, in 1986, I had a second one that suddenly caused me to move up the coast from Los Angeles to Seattle, where I landed in the middle of what is arguably the greatest attempt yet made to bring alternative energy to the American marketplace. The company sold the best heating system that has ever been on the world market, and it placed that system for free on the customers’ homes, in the most ingenious marketing plan that I ever saw. That effort was killed by the local electric industry, which saw our technology as a threat to their revenues and profits, and my wild ride began. The owner of the Seattle business left the state to rebuild his effort, and I followed him to Boston and soon became his partner. His experiences in Seattle radicalized him, and I would soon be radicalized myself.

The day after I arrived in Boston, we began to pursue what is today called free energy, or new energy. We attracted the interest of a legendary and shadowy group while we were in Boston, and they offered ten million dollars for the rights to our fledgling technology. I have called the controlling group the Global Controllers, and others have different terms for them. However, they are not the focus of my writings. I regard them as a symptom of our collective malaise, not a cause. Our fate is in our hands, not theirs. Our efforts also caused great commotion in New England’s electric industry and attempts by the local authorities to wipe out our business. They were likely trying to protect their economic turf and were not consciously acting on the Global Controllers’ behalf, as was also largely the case in Seattle.

We moved our business to Ventura, California, where I had been raised, in 1987, before the sledgehammer in Boston could fall on us. We moved because I connected us with technologies and talent that made our free energy efforts potentially feasible. Our public awareness efforts became highly successful, and we were building free energy prototypes. In early 1988, our efforts were targeted by the local authorities, again at the behest of energy interests, both local and global. In a surprise raid in which the authorities blatantly stole our technical materials, mere weeks after those same authorities assured us that we were not going anything illegal, my radicalization began. A few months later, my partner was offered about a billion dollars to cease our operations by that shadowy global group, with the CIA delivering the offer. When my partner refused their offer, he was arrested with a million dollar bail for failing to file a form, and our nightmare began. The turning point of my life was when I became the defense’s key witness and the prosecution made faces at me while I was on the witness stand, as they tried to intimidate me. It inspired me to sacrifice my life in an attempt to free my partner, and it incredibly worked, in the greatest miracle that I ever witnessed. I helped free my partner, but my life had been ruined by the events of 1988, and in 1990 I left Ventura and never returned. I had been radicalized, and I then spent the next several years trying to understand what I had lived through and why the world worked starkly differently than how I had been taught it did. I began the study and writing that culminated in publishing my first website in 1996, which was when I also briefly rejoined my former partner after he was released from prison, after the courts fraudulently placed him there, and after prison officials repeatedly put him in position to be murdered.

As I discovered the hard way, contrary to my business school indoctrination, there is little that resembles a free market in the USA, particularly in its energy industry, and there has never been a truly free market anywhere or anytime, a real democracy, a free press, an objective history, a purely pursued scientific method, or any other imaginary constructs that our dominant institutions promote. They may all be worthy ideals, but none have existed in the real world. Regarding free markets in the energy industry, reality has effectively been inverted, with the world’s greatest effort of organized suppression preventing alternative energy technology of any significance from public awareness and use.

Soon after I moved from Ventura, I met a former astronaut who was hired by NASA with a Mars mission in mind, and was investigating the free energy field. We eventually became colleagues and co-founded a non-profit organization intended to raise public awareness of new energy. A few days after we began planning the organization’s first conference in 2004, our keynote speaker was murdered and my astronaut colleague immediately and understandably moved to South America, where he spent the rest of his life. In the spring of 2013, I spent a few days with my former free energy partner, and like my astronaut colleague, he had also been run out the USA after mounting an effort around high-MPG carburetor technology, with the federal government attacking soon after he was contacted by a legendary figure in the oil industry. My partner also attracted the attention of the sitting USA’s president. Every American president since Ronald Reagan knew my partner by name, but they proved to be rather low-ranking in the global power structure.

My astronaut colleague investigated the UFO phenomenon early in his adventures on the frontiers of science, and nearly lost his life at the hands of the American military for his trouble. It became evident that the UFO and free energy issues were conjoined, and a faction of the global elites demonstrated some of their exotic and sequestered technologies to a close fellow traveler, which included free energy and antigravity technologies. My astronaut colleague was involved with the same free energy inventor that some around me were, and that inventor invented a solid-state free energy prototype that not only produced a million times the energy that went into it, but it also produced antigravity effects. I eventually understood the larger context of our efforts and encountered numerous fellow travelers, and they all reported similar experiences, of having their technologies seized or otherwise suppressed, of being incarcerated and/or surviving murder attempts, and other outrages inflicted by global elites as they maintained their tyrannical grip over the world economy and, hence, humanity. It was no conspiracy theory, but what my fellow travelers and I learned at great personal cost, which was fatal all too often.

I continued to study and write, and became my astronaut colleague’s biographer. My former partner is the Indiana Jones of the free energy field, but I eventually realized that while it was awe-inspiring to witness his efforts, one man with a whip and fedora cannot save humanity from itself, and I eventually took a different path from my partner and astronaut colleague, and one fruit of that direction is this essay. Not only was the public largely indifferent to what we were attempting, but those attracted to our efforts were either gawkers or betrayed us at the first opportunity. As we weathered attacks from the local, national, and global power structures, such treacherous opportunities abounded. I witnessed dozens of attempts by my partner’s associates to steal his companies from him, and my astronaut colleague was twice kicked out of organizations that he founded, by the very people that he invited to help him. During my radicalizing years with my partner, I came to my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity, and it is the primary reason why humanity is in this predicament; the antics of the global elites are of minor importance. The enemy is us.

I eventually realized that there were not enough heroes on Earth to get free energy over the hump of humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression. Soon after I completed my present website in 2002, one of R. Buckminster Fuller’s pupils called my writings “comprehensivist,” and I did not know what he meant. I then read some of Fuller’s work and saw the point, and my work since then has been more consciously comprehensivist (also called “generalist”) in nature.

This essay is intended to draw a comprehensive picture of life on Earth, the human journey, and the role of energy. The references that support this essay are often to works written for laypeople or those of only modest academic achievement, so that non-scientists can study the same works without needing specialized scientific training. I am trying to help form a comprehensive awareness in a tiny fraction of the global population, with between 5,000 and 10,000 people being my goal. My hope is that the energy issue can become the focus of that tiny fraction. Properly educated, that tiny fraction might be able to help catalyze an energy effort that can overcome the obstacles. That envisioned group may help humanity in many ways, but my primary goal is manifesting those technologies in the public sphere in a way that nobody risks life or livelihood. I have seen too many wrecked and prematurely ended lives in this milieu (1, 2), and plan to avoid those fates, for both myself and the group’s members.

What follows is a brief summary of this essay. Ever since life first appeared more than three billion years ago, about a billion years after the Sun and Earth formed, organisms have continually invented more effective methods to acquire, preserve, and use energy. Complex life appeared after three billion years of evolution and, pound-for-pound, it used energy a hundred thousand times as fast as the Sun produced it. The story of life on Earth has been one of evolutionary trends impacted by geophysical processes, and in turn influencing them. In the eon of complex life that began nearly 600 million years ago, there have been many brief golden ages of relative energy abundance for some lucky species, soon followed by increased energy competition, a relatively stable struggle for energy, and mass extinction events clearing biomes for another golden age by organisms adapted to the new environments. This pattern of speciation, radiation into new niches/environments, golden ages, competitive struggles, and mass extinctions have characterized the journey of complex life over the past several hundred million years, and intelligence began to increase among some animals, which provided them with a competitive advantage in the energy and survival game.

About 2.5 million years ago, when our current ice age began, our ancestors learned how to make stone tools, soon followed by the control of fire, and the human journey’s First Epochal Event(s?) transpired, and the human line’s brain began growing dramatically. About two million years later, the human line evolved to the point where behaviorally modern humans appeared, left Africa, and conquered all inhabitable continents. Their expansion was fueled by driving most of Earth’s large animals to extinction, and that Second Epochal Event was also the beginning of the Sixth Mass Extinction. After all the easy meat was extinct and the brief Golden Age of the Hunter-Gather ended, population pressures led to the Third Epochal Event: domesticating plants and animals. That event led to civilization, and many features of the human journey often argued to be human nature, such as slavery and the subjugation of women, were really only artifacts of the energy regime and societal structure of agriculturally based civilizations. Early civilizations were never stable, as their energy practices, largely based on deforestation and agriculture on the deforested soils, were never sustainable, and early civilizations primarily collapsed because they ran out of energy, which was usually due to their unsustainable methods of energy production.

As the Old World’s civilizations continually rose and fell, the peoples of Europe rediscovered ancient teachings that were the first stirrings of a scientific approach, they used energy technologies from that ancient period, borrowed novel energy practices from other Old World civilizations, and achieved the technological feat of turning the world’s oceans into a low-energy transportation lane. Europe thereby began conquering the world. During that conquest, one of the imperial contenders turned to fossil fuels as their woodlands were depleted by early industrialization, and England soon industrialized using coal, thereby initiating humanity’s Fourth Epochal Event, and it quickly became Earth’s dominant imperial power. As Europe conquered Earth, elites, who first appeared with the first civilizations, likely began thinking in global terms for the first time, and a global power structure began developing. As we discovered the hard way, that power structure is very real, but almost nobody on Earth has a balanced and mature perspective regarding it, either denying its existence or obsessing about it, seeing it as the root of our problems, when it is really only a side-effect of humanity’s current stage of political-economic evolution, which has always been based on its level of energy usage.

Today, industrialized humanity is almost wholly dependent on the energy provided by hydrocarbon fuels that were created by geological processes operating on the remains of organisms, and humanity is mining and burning those hydrocarbon deposits about a million times as fast as they were created. We are reaching peak extraction rates but, more importantly, we have already discovered all of the easily acquired hydrocarbons. We are currently seeking and mining Earth’s remaining hydrocarbon deposits, which are of poor energetic quality. It is merely the latest instance of humanity depleting its energy resources, which always mined the dregs after the easily acquired energy was consumed. The megafauna extinctions created the energy crisis that led to domestication and civilization, and the energy crisis of early industrialization led to using hydrocarbon energy. However, far more often over the course of the human journey, depleting the energy resources led to population collapses, with even local extinctions of humans in remote locations. Expanding and collapsing populations have been characteristic of the rising and falling polities during the past several thousand years, after the first civilizations appeared.

Today, humanity completely dominates Earth and is not only depleting its primary energy resources at mind-boggling rates, but it is also driving species to extinction at a rate that rivals the greatest mass extinctions in Earth’s history. Humans may cause Earth’s greatest mass extinction, which may take humanity with it. Today, humanity stands on the brink of the abyss, and almost nobody seems to know or care. Humanity is a tunnel-visioned, egocentric species, with almost all people only concerned about their immediate self-interest, oblivious of what lies ahead. Not all humans are so blind, and biologists and climate scientists, among others intimately familiar with the impacts of global civilization, are terrified by what humanity is inflicting onto Earth. Also, those who realize that we are quickly coming to the Hydrocarbon Age’s end are beating the drums of doom, and I cannot blame them. We are in a “race of the catastrophes” scenario, with several manmade dynamics threating our future existence.

Even the ultra-elites who run Earth from the shadows readily see how their game of chicken with Earth may turn out, and while more extreme members advocate terraforming Mars as their ultimate survival enclave if their games of power and control make Earth uninhabitable, the saner members, who apparently are now a majority of that global cabal, favor the dissemination of those sequestered technologies. I am nearly certain that members of that disenchanted faction are those who gave my close associate an underground technology demonstration, and who would quietly cheer our efforts when I worked with my former partner. They may also be subtly supporting my current efforts, of which this essay comprises a key component, but I have not heard from them and am not counting on them to save the day or help my efforts garner success. It is time for humanity to reach the level of collective sentience and integrity required to manifest humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, which will be the Age of Free Energy. Humanity can then live, for the first time, in an epoch of true, sustainable abundance. It could also halt the Sixth Mass Extinction, and humanity could turn Earth into something resembling heaven. With the Fifth Epochal Event, humanity will become a space-faring species, and a future will beckon that nobody on Earth today can truly imagine, just as nobody on Earth could predict how each event epochal transformed the human journey (1, 2, 3, 4).

Also, each epochal event was initiated by a small group of people, perhaps even by one person for the earliest events, and even the Industrial Revolution and its attendant Scientific Revolution had exceedingly few fathers. However, I came to realize that there is probably nobody else on Earth today like my former partner, and even Indiana Jones cannot save the world by himself. With the strategy that I finally developed, I do not look for heroes, because I know that there are not enough walking Earth today. I am trying something far more modest, but which may have great impact. The greatest triumph of the ultra-elites running Earth today is making free energy technology and the resulting epoch of abundance unimaginable, and all of today’s dominant ideologies assume scarcity in the foundation of their frameworks, which is largely why my former partner and my astronaut colleague were voices in the wilderness and similar to ducks in a shooting gallery that did not know where the next shot would come from. The most damaging shots were usually fired by their “allies,” right into their backs, which nobody could have convinced me of in 1985. But after watching the same scenarios play out dozens of times, I finally had to admit the obvious.

I noticed several crippling weaknesses in all alternative energy efforts that I was involved with or witnessed. Most importantly, when my partner mounted his efforts, the participants primarily became involved to serve their self-interest. While the pursuit of mutual self-interest is the very definition of politics, self-interested people were easily defeated by organized suppression, although the efforts usually self-destructed before suppression efforts became intense. Another deficiency that I noticed in all large free energy efforts was that most participants were scientifically illiterate and did not see much beyond the possibility of reducing their energy bills or becoming rich. Once the effort was destroyed (and they always are, if they have any promise), the participants left the alternative energy field. Also, many lives were wrecked as each effort was defeated, so almost nobody was able or willing to pick up the pieces to try again. Every time that my partner rebuilt his efforts, it was primarily with new people, with few individuals lasting for more than one attempt.

I realize that almost nobody on Earth today can pass the integrity tests that my fellow travelers and allies were subjected to, and do not ask that of anybody whom I will attempt to recruit into my upcoming effort. It will be a non-heroic approach, of “merely” achieving enough heart-centered sentience and awareness to where a world of free energy and abundance is only imagined by a sizeable group who will not stay quiet about it, but who will also not be proselytizing. If they can truly understand this essay’s message, they will likely not know anybody else in their daily lives who can.

Those recruits will simply be singing a song of practical abundance that will attract those who have been pining for that song for their entire lifetimes. Once enough people know the song by heart and can sing it, and have attracted a large enough audience that can approach the free energy issue in way that risks nobody’s life and will not be easy for the provocateurs and the effort’s “allies” to wreck, it will be time to take action, but in a way that has never been tried before.

That is my plan, and this essay is intended to form the foundation of my efforts to educate and amass that “choir” that will sing the abundance song. I am looking for singers, not soldiers. That “choir” may only help a little, it may help a lot, but it will not harm anybody. This effort could be called trying the enlightenment path to free energy, an abundance-based global political economy, and a healed humanity and planet. I believe that the key is approaching the issue as creators instead of victims; from a place of love instead of fear. Those goals may seem grandiose to the uninitiated, and people in this field regularly succumb to a messiah complex and harbor other delusions of grandeur, but I also know it is attainable if only a tiny fraction of humanity can help launch that Fifth Epochal Event, just as with the previous epochal events. This essay is designed for initiating training. Learning this material will be a formidable undertaking, and is not designed for quick-study artists, skimmers, and those looking for easy answers, but nothing less will help my readers attain the levels of understanding that I think are necessary for this epochal undertaking.

Wade Frazier
1st May 2014, 18:30
Hi:

Because of last week’s exchanges, I updated one of my levels of the FE Onion, for the first change in years:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level11

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
1st May 2014, 20:51
Thank you, Wade, what an uplift (post #3356). Truly intoxicating scenery.. simply ravishing, the 'enchanted forest' especially leaves one out of breath..

In that regard but only in reverse, your updating of the 11th layer of the onion also points of intoxication but rather of a different kind. Maybe spending time in nature may help the 'valtures' to sober up a little and obtain a different view of the landscape and be reminded of one's place in the general Avifauna, which has nothing to do with individual wingspan, but with flocking together (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nffdc9sLYnY) as a single unit which may yield another type of profit, one that was never seen before in the whole history of the human race.

Something to look forward to ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
1st May 2014, 23:58
Hi:

Boy, I am getting close. Below is what I banged out since the last post.

Best,

Wade

Before discussing my approach, I will present the state of the FE field today, which will also help explain why I am taking my current approach. Dennis and I began our FE journeys largely ignorant of our predecessors, and really did not know that there was an FE field, but we began hearing about it soon enough, as people approached us with tales of woe. The stories were not only about FE, but any technologies that various oligarchies thought threatened their rackets, from high-MPG cars to windmill farms to innovate mining techniques and even to low-water toilets. We heard of FE inventors having their entire families murdered, with their homes burned down and bulldozed, inventors thrown in jail on the flimsiest pretexts, and many legal outrages, primarily occurring in the USA, the Land of the Free. It began to become monotonous. It was not long before we were taken out in one of the more spectacular snuff jobs in the entire history of FE attempts. My life was ruined, my partner who helped me spring Dennis from jail had his life wrecked and shortened. The carnage spread far and wide, with peripheral players having their lives wrecked, and I still hear sad stories from participants until this very day.

While the media had libeled Dennis since I met him, what eventually shocked me as I became aware of the FE field was that leading voices in the FE field also libeled Dennis. They were not little white lies, but Big Lies that served as centerpieces of their attacks. When the libelers were confronted with their lies, sometimes by me, they either gave the challengers the one-fingered-salute or made up more lies. I also watched big names in the field eagerly embrace the libelers and their lies while they attacked Dennis and Brian. They essentially acted like the psychopaths on the Global Controllers’ payroll who were sicced on us over the years. Those behaviors only reinforced the primary lesson of my journey, and provided more evidence that the enemy is us. What was probably more disconcerting was naïve FE newcomers and enthusiasts actually handing me one libel tract in particular as an example of great writing about the FE issue (!). I am not kidding, and that libel tract has been given to me at least twenty times. The gullibility and naïveté of those in the FE field, combined with the libelers and other criminals in the ranks, are partly why soon before he died, Brian said that if anybody brings FE to the world, it will not be the people in the field today. I became attracted to Brian’s work when I read his Miracle in the Void, and for the first time that I could recall, somebody in the FE field wrote about Dennis without lying about him.

All the low-integrity activities in the FE field aside, it has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive. When the Global Controllers wiped us out in 1988, what made us dangerous was not so much the technology we were working on, but we were building a network of businesses that could distribute disruptive energy technology, and Sparky Sweet lived right down the road from us. If we became too prominent to easily snuff out, plenty of people like Sparky would have come forward. That was the real threat that we presented, led by Dennis’s ingenious methods and his unparalleled courage.

Other than Dennis and a few others, the FE field has generally been dominated by inventors and scientists. It was similar to the super heat pump “industry” when Dennis arrived on the scene. The traditional solar industry also attacked Dennis when he sold the best heating system that has ever been on the world market. Everybody saw Dennis as a threat, not only the energy oligarchy led by the Global Controllers, but “competitors” in the alternative energy field and those scientists and inventors who libeled Dennis. It was more than a little dismaying to see the attacks coming from supposed “allies” in the field. Today, I cannot currently recommend anybody in the FE field. There are some worthy players in the milieu, but their approach has never come close to working. I will survey some of the pitfalls that FE aspirants regularly fall into, and stumbling into them can be life-wrecking or fatal.

The Global Controllers are merely the apex predator in an political-economic jungle filled with predators. If the Global Controllers are Godzilla, then the jungles are also filled with tyrannosaurs, velociraptors, and the many docile herbivores that they feast on, with some eking out existences on the margins. Most Americans have no awareness of the issue, but the USA’s federal government has classified thousands of patents, largely energy-related patents, according to credible sources. This 1971 guide for what can be classified extended to photovoltaics that had efficiencies of greater than 10%, or any energy conversion technology that achieved higher than a 70-80% efficiency. FE devices are often called “over-unity” because they put out more energy than it takes to run them. Sparky Sweet’s device was 10,000,000,000% efficient, which was a little over the threshold for classifying it. Sparky never patented his device, but kept it proprietary, avoiding seizure that way. But thousands of energy technology inventors have had their patented devices seized under the national security laws, and that is merely the tip of the iceberg of what has been suppressed. What got Steven Greer, the founder of the Disclosure Project, pursuing FE was when he met with a faction of the Global Controllers. The meeting was in the early 1990s, and in 2004, I heard Greer report some of his conversations with them, and one disclosure was that the Global Controllers had paid $100 billion to sequester disruptive technologies over the years, and energy technologies above all. When I heard Greer say that, it made perfect sense to me, as Dennis rejected two offers that I know of, and I even heard of others in casual conversations with corporate co-workers. The amount may be $200 billion by now. Those taking the money have donned what I call “Golden Handcuffs,” as that money bought their silence and their technology was usually shelved. But even Golden Handcuffs are a fair ways down the path of organized suppression. As I heard from Tom Bearden in 1998, the Global Controllers’ bag of tricks is deep, and many low-cost strategies can be tried before they resort to using Golden Handcuffs, using the patent office to seize technologies, and in the relatively rare instance, violence. Kangarooing Dennis into prison and then making “mistakes” that put him in with murderers, is one of many techniques at their disposal, and such treatment is often free-lance malice engaged in by “public servants” and other Establishment figures, without them needing to be contacted or compensated by the Global Controllers, or even being aware of the evil interests that their actions serve, and they probably would not care if they even knew, and many would solicit “employment” if they knew how valuable their activities were to rich and powerful interests.

When the Global Controllers’ minions engage in lethal interventions, either by direct murder or throwing people such as Dennis into a shark tank and letting “nature” take its course, what seems to be more important than killing the target in any particular attempt is making it appear to be something other than premeditated murder. I am not at liberty to disclose details of numerous murder attempts that have been described to me either from the target or second-hand by highly credible associates of mine, but it is not easy to murder somebody and make it look like something else (accident, random crime, suicide, heart attack, cancer, etc.), and if an attempt initially fails, the assassins will not “double tap” them like the Mafia will, as it removes any doubt that it was murder. If the target survives the initial attempt, the assassins will withdraw and try again another time, as making it look like something else is more important than being successful with any one attempt. This is likely why some FE activists have survived numerous murder attempts; Dennis should be dead many times over, and he has survived several outright murder attempts, and few were likely Global Controller attempts, but from other interests. Also, a failed attempt can often have the desired effect, which was disabling the target from doing anything productive in the disruptive technology field, FE most of all. Lives have been shortened and wrecked by failed attempts, and another attempt was unnecessary. These are not Walter Mitty or paranoid fantasies, but the territory that FE aspirants have encountered. I do not like hearing about them, and neither did Brian, but he knew about 25 dead inventor stories.

Nobody has ever mounted more auspicious or persistent attempts at the businessman’s route to alternative energy than Dennis’s. If Dennis could not do it, I do not know who can. But the field is filled with inventors with dreams of fame and fortune, who think they are the messiah, and who apply for patents, try to raise money, and so on. I have never seen one of them with a prayer of success and I try to ignore them, but I am bombarded with news of the inventor-of-the-hour by various FE enthusiasts and dabblers. During the month that I drafted this essay’s chapter, I was informed of the activities of no less than half-dozen aspirants and their technologies, with FE being the usual technology, but can also include high-MPG cars. They are all the same paths to disaster that I have survived, witnessed, read of, and heard of. A famous quote attributed to Einstein and Ben Franklin, among others, is that insanity is performing the same act repeatedly, expecting a different outcome each time. The entire FE field suffers from that insanity, trying the same approaches literally tens of thousands of times, each time thinking that they will succeed. What makes that situation slightly more justified is that few survive the first failure to try again, so the field is “weeded out” that way, and the organized suppression is usually so subtle that its targets do not even realized that they were suppressed. However, it is long past time for a different approach and, refreshingly, there have been baby steps in the direction that I will advocate, made by various members of the field.

In summary, here are some of the approaches that have never come close to working and likely never will, and why:

1. Patenting an FE invention:

a. For FE machines, patents are generally denied on the “laws of physics” objection, even though it is an irrelevant criteria for patenting a device (many patents are granted for Rube-Goldberg-ish devices);
b. The applicants have announced their self-serving intentions, and organized suppression almost effortlessly defeats the self-interested;
c. Patents can be granted and then seized using national security laws, and inventors can go to prison if they keep developing their inventions, in an Orwellian twist;
2. Raising money from capitalistic sources (venture capital, stock sales, and other kinds of investors):

a. Raising money is a quick way to go to prison on trumped up charges (1, 2);
b. If inventors try that route, they will eventually lose the rights to their technologies to their investors; even for normal inventing, inventors rarely profit from their inventions, and for FE inventing, it is well-nigh impossible;
c. If the invention has promise for making FE, some investors will undoubtedly be agents of organized suppression or garden-variety organized crime;
d. In capitalistic efforts, members of the effort regularly become seduced by the immensity of FE’s potential, and the Treasure of the Sierra Madre effect arises, and the effort collapses in an orgy of self-destructive greed;
3. Finding rich philanthropists:

a. “Rich philanthropist” is an oxymoron; there are probably no truly “rich philanthropists” active on Earth today;
b. For the few that may have wanted to help fund FE efforts, the Global Controllers quickly dissuaded them; that avenue is closely monitored;
4. Sneaking past the Global Controllers:

a. They have global surveillance capabilities second to none, and cannot be snuck past;
b. The very attempt to sneak past them is an adolescent fantasy that usually leads to paranoia and other foibles, and self-destruction of the effort;
5. A guerilla revolution led by garage inventors possessing blueprints on how to build FE prototypes:

a. Making an FE prototype is far harder than it might seem – relatively few garage tinkerers ever develop anything worth suppressing, and still usually wreck their lives in the process, before any suppression techniques need to be applied;
b. Many inventors have demonstrated FE prototypes, but for those who were not immediately subjected to suppression activity (often the violent kind), the gulf between a working prototype and something for public use is more than $100 million;
c. There is no army of garage tinkerers waiting for the blueprints to go build one, that will organize into an effective effort;
6. Mounting a mass movement around ideologies such as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion:

a. Those ideologies are seated in scarcity-based, self-serving, fearful assumptions, and the Global Controller have masterfully used those ideologies to control the masses; out-herding the master shepherd with his own tools is very unlikely;
b. Because those ideologies all cater to self-interest, the effort attracts those of corrupt motivation from the outset, and are easily defeated by organized suppression, if they do not collapse from the inside before then;
c. Scarcity-based ideologies are old skins that will not hold the new wine;
7. Trying to conquer the organized suppression:

a. Only extremely foolish men in thrall to adolescent fantasies consider this approach, and its immature, battle-oriented perspective will defeat the effort before it begins;
b. The only casualties will be those adolescent warriors and those they are allegedly trying to help; the Global Controllers are not threatened by such approaches;
8. Media campaigns:

a. The media is a key part of the global power structure, and it again is their tool, not the activists’;
b. For every dollar an activist spends on media campaigns, the power structure will spend a hundred times as much to overwhelm the effort with negative coverage;
9. The hero’s or messiah’s journey:

a. It is an archetypal role that almost nobody on Earth is qualified to play, and many are easily seduced into thinking that they are the messiah or world’s hero; it again appeals to men, especially young ones; megalomania is a hazard for this approach;
b. For the few who are qualified for such a role/task, one hero/messiah against the Global Controllers does not stand a chance;
10. Hosting conferences to raise awareness:

a. Such conferences are crawling with agents of various interests, including the CIA and other intelligence organizations, the Global Controllers, and local, state, and federal law enforcement acting on behalf of various interests, none of whom are allies and are usually trying to destroy the effort;
b. Attempted murder of key conference figures before, during, or immediately after the conference is common;
c. Those attending the conferences rarely have agendas in alignment with the conference’s intention; groupies and other celebrity chasers attend, many come for the show or to fill their social needs, and many unwary and gullible participants easily fall under the spell of the psychopathic agents that infiltrate the effort to help take it down from the inside, usually striking when the attacks come from the outside;
11. Beseeching the world’s governments for assistance, particularly their military arms:

a. They are usually key players in sending those agents to conferences;
b. They all answer, at some level, to the Global Controllers, although almost nobody in those organizations is aware of the Global Controllers in the slightest;
c. Washington D.C. activists often end up dead, and others have “enjoyed” somewhat less dire fates, but I have never heard of D.C. activism in these areas that had a happy ending;
12. Beseeching environmental, charitable, scientific, or academic institutions:

a. They all have ideological commitments to their scarcity-based frames of reference, and they almost always view FE either as the enemy, or impossible because of the “laws of physics,” or they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” and they have other reactions of denial; they are the groups often most resistant the very idea of FE.

I have seen it all, and watched them play out with varying levels of dismay. They are all methods of either giving our power away to someone or something else, pouring the new wine into old skins, and generally acting from a scarcity-based and victim-oriented perspective, and they will not work. Newcomers invariably advocate some kind of shortcut, an easy path to the finish line. There are not any. The Fifth Epochal Event is not something that can be initiated in an afternoon, a month, or a year of effort, and I have watched many lifetimes expended in the pursuit, including mine. Nothing about this is easy, and I have helped the best of the best spend their lives trying. With a sufficient nugget of enlightenment, it could be an easy task, but achieving that state is the hard part. Humanity is far from an enlightened species at this time.

For several years, I have stated that the only inventor-oriented approach with a prayer is for an inventor with the goods (a viable prototype undoubtedly generating FE) to give it to a worthy group so that they can take it the rest of the way, past humanity’s inertia and any organized suppression that might be inflicted on the effort. I have never heard of the inventor with the goods willing to give it away, and that worthy group does not yet exist, and my efforts can be seen as trying to help form it. Hectoring the inventor with the goods unwilling to give it away, if there is nobody worth giving it to that can carry it forward, is not helpful.

Many years ago, after surviving my FE adventures, beginning to understand the milieu and trading notes with fellow travelers, I began to suspect that what I had experienced on the mundane level, of discovering that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity, was only a hint of something far more vast, my numerous paranormal events aside. I got the sense that the zero-point field was divine in nature, and if an intelligent species did not approach the issue with sufficient divine intention, they could not access the field, or access it for long. The Global Controllers might be doing humanity a favor, acting as some kind of integrity threshold that humanity must clear before the path to FE will open. Ten like Dennis, or a hundred like Brian, and the world would have had FE by now, but there are not that many like them on Earth. I began to suspect that the problem was really a lack of integrity and enlightenment, in ways that go far beyond practical notions of those issues. I have consequently been trying to walk and advocate the enlightenment route. Mine is more from an academic/activist perspective, not a messianic or mystical master approach. But the teachings of the masters, at least those that have not been distorted by the priesthoods, I believe are highly relevant. Some kind of spiritual grounding is probably necessary to pursue FE, but I would not advocate receiving it through organized religions. If love is understood as the best of all possible feelings, and acts from the heart are recognized as the most powerful that we can achieve, that is probably sufficient spiritual understanding. Anything less than a divinely intended approach toward FE may not work, for reasons far beyond organized suppression or the public’s inertia. That is just an impression that slowly dawned on me, which I cannot prove to anybody, but it guides my thinking and efforts. Also, sources I respect have stated that the mean become the ends, and I that is consistent with what I learned during my adventures.

Wade Frazier
2nd May 2014, 12:18
Hi:

I finished it! It hit 400 pages (or 185,000 words, for you writers out there), as I suspected it would. I have plenty of basic cleanup and editing to perform in the coming days, and I am probably a couple of weeks away from having a draft for my pals to beat on for a couple of months. I plan to publish the essay this summer, the earlier in the summer the better, but I also feel a great deal of pressure to have the essay’s first edition in as good a shape as possible. The process of having this thread at Avalon has been helpful in ways, maddening in others, but I will always be grateful for the opportunity to “blog” here, and I made some new pals, which is always a blessing.

When I publish the essay, I will also form a forum just for choir practice, but I may have a presence here at Avalon as long as I am able to.

Thanks for being out there.

Wade

Here is the essay’s final chapter as it stands today, in two posts, as usual. I expect that this chapter will receive the most editorial attention, and we will see what the final version looks like.


What Has Not Worked So Far, and What Might – Part 1
Many thousands of attempts have been made to develop and bring disruptive energy technology to the public, up to and including FE. In this essay’s first chapter, I reviewed my journey and touched on Dennis Lee’s, who was my partner during my days of pursuing FE, and that chapter also touched on Brian O’Leary’s unbelievable journey. This chapter will dig a little deeper into our stories.

Our journeys into alternative and eventually free energy began at about the same time: during the USA’s first energy crisis. Mine began when my first professional mentor invented what was hailed as the world’s best engine for powering an automobile, which he invented just before the crisis, and which caused great commotion within the federal government. During the furor, I had my mystical awakening, spent two months in Europe absorbing its art and culture, and began dreaming of changing the energy industry. Dennis is twelve years older than me, and as I was dreaming of changing the energy industry, he was having his first company destroyed in the mayhem of the 1973-1974 energy crisis. Brian began his alternative energy odyssey around the same time, as he engaged in Capitol Hill activism and advised presidential candidates.

Dennis was raised as a poor rural white of Scots-Irish heritage, growing up as a migrant farm worker, when white people still did that in the USA. He left home at age 13 because his family could no longer afford to feed him, and his journey took him to Vietnam in 1968, as a medic who saw combat. Not long after his Vietnam experience, Dennis had his mystical awakening in an event far more dramatic than mine, when he heard a voice in his head that he calls “God.” Several years later, as I had my first existential crisis and prayed for guidance, I too heard a voice, which changed my studies from science to business. Several years after that, I prayed for guidance for the second and so far last time in my life. The voice again responded and suggested that I move far away, and I immediately landed in the midst of Dennis’s company. I heard from that voice one more time, that time unbidden, and do not want to hear from it anymore. I have no idea who or what the voice was, but it had an omniscience that I sure do not possess. Even though I have not asked for that voice again and have not heard it, during the time spent writing this essay, I can tell that my “friends” have been orchestrating my life’s events once again. Such events are not uniformly unpleasant, but they usually challenge me in uncomfortable ways which seem to come with the territory. While I have never heard of any other FE attempts having such preposterous levels of otherworldly “intervention,” efforts like ours have often been accompanied by similar incidents. We all lose any beliefs that we might have had in coincidence.

All of those hard-to-believe events aside, I became a student of genius, learning at my first professional mentor’s knee, and while it was the great integrity that Dennis displayed as his Seattle company was being destroyed that sold me on him (as well as that voice leading me to him), when I chased him to Boston to help rebuild his effort, it quickly became evident that I was learning from another world-class genius, and I avidly studied his efforts. He probably did his most interesting work before I met him. He invented the energy industry’s first shared savings program, and his marketing programs were awe-inspiring. Dennis was an untrained businessman, but his ability to erect a disruptive energy technology company with no capital and create the entire process, from developing the technology, building it, and marketing it, is the best that I have ever seen or heard of, and his public image rarely even touched upon his unparalleled talent in that area. Those abilities paled beside his other qualifications, which nobody else that I know of has matched. That voice knew what it was doing in leading me to Dennis, but being Indiana Jones’s sidekick was not an easy ride, and I have generally rejected Dennis’s entreaties to rejoin him after I helped free him from jail. Even as I write this, our story seems ridiculously fanciful, but it all happened and more, with connections and events I am not at liberty to publicly disclose that makes Indiana Jones’s journey look like Walter Mitty’s. As dramatic as those events were, our focus was always on bringing FE to the world.

In Boston, we were still recovering from our Seattle effort when we were offered $10 million for Dennis’s naïve idea for making FE. A year later, just before we were wiped out, Dennis received an offer of about $1 billion to fold our operation, delivered by a CIA man who said that he represented “European interests.” Soon after Dennis rejected the offer, our nightmare truly began, and when the dust settled a couple of years later, my life was shattered and I was radicalized. I would never see the world the same way again, and my site and this essay are the fruit of long years of study in my radicalized state. I had subsequent adventures that were milder, even though I risked prison again with Dennis, but I have had too much adventure and I am trying to live a fairly quiet life. The year after leaving my home town, where my life was wrecked, I met Brian and eventually carried his spears, and they were fortunately much lighter than Dennis’s. I always respected Dennis and Brian the most in the FE field, and I valued their integrity above all else. Their great hearts attracted me to them, not their talent, genius, or fame. I have written plenty about my days with Dennis and Brian, and interested readers can discover more if they wish. I hope to convey what the learning experience of carrying their spears was like. My learning curve with Dennis was insanely steep and comprised the kind of education that few survive for long. While my education with Brian was far gentler, I learned important lessons from him. If not for my adventures, I would likely not have much worth saying. Even though much of this essay “merely” deals with mainstream science theory and data, my radicalized perspective is responsible for how I approached the issues. This essay is obviously not the work of a professional scientist or economist.

As I stepped back periodically, during the quiet times, I reflected on our experiences and what our fellow travelers reported, and my views gradually changed. My initial orientation was the inventor’s approach, and that I got it the same year as my mystical awakening was likely significant for evolving my current perspective. That voice suggested that I study business, and I began developing the businessman’s perspective long before I met Dennis. My years with Dennis were about trying to make those teenage dreams a reality. I soon realized that my first mentor’s attitude misled me about inventors in general. Nearly all inventors invent to get rich and famous, not to help the world. I have still never met an altruistic inventor. I soon saw many unethical and criminal acts engaged in by Dennis’s “allies.” When I told Dennis how shocking it was to see, he told me to join the club. Witnessing the orgies of fear and greed that Dennis’s associates regularly engaged in was a critical aspect of my awakening process, but what may have been more “fascinating” was how easily the GCs’ agents played Dennis’s associates like musical instruments, as they used everybody’s fear and greed to push the effort into self-destruction, and those “instruments” they so effortlessly played included people far older and supposedly worldlier than me. Bill the BPA Hit Man was definitely a professional provocateur, Mr. Texas was almost certainly one, and Mr. Deputy was also one, although people like them rarely know exactly whom they really work for, nor do they care, as long as they are handsomely compensated. I had difficultly believing that “smart” people could be manipulated that way, but I soon understood that I was witnessing them surpass the limits of their integrity. Those affable and talented psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll usually played a fake angel game to get “allies” to betray us, and it often worked. After several years of observing such events, seeing people I had known for nearly my entire life act dishonorably, naïvely, cowardly, and even criminally, I learned my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity. The reason why we do not have FE and a healed planet today is because of the general population’s low integrity. I resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms. Today’s situation has little to do with the GCs and their minions. Almost nobody wants to hear that sobering truth, however, which is also part of the problem. Denial of how the world really works will not help for manifesting FE and a healed planet and humanity. The enemy is us, and always has been.

I watched Dennis try every approach that he could think of, from businesses to non-profits to the “patriot” approach and more. Dennis is a literalist Christian, and has tried the religion route several times, which always ended in disaster, along with every other approach, and his openly professed religious fanaticism understandably dissuaded many from becoming involved with our efforts. I was always with Dennis in spite of his religious views, not because of them. All FE aspirants that I knew of had personal foibles, including me, which comes with being human. Brian readily admitted that his astronaut and “bright lights” days tended to inflate his ego, and he had his Lapis Pig and Einsteinian hair, while the Disclosure Project’s founder took the über-warrior approach after his team was killed off soon after those Congressional hearings. I am a reclusive semi-nerd who can become overemotional. We are/were all citizens of history’s most arrogant nation, and we were nearly all geniuses, which presented all of us with challenges in humility. I have watched FE activists disappear down the mystical rabbit hole and fall into the many pitfalls that await the newcomer. A week before I drafted this essay’s final chapter, a relatively new FE hopeful claimed that he was The Second Coming, and he is not the first one to do that. The perfect candidate to lead an FE effort likely does not exist, but personal integrity is the quality that I value above all others. If a person does not have a sufficient store of it to begin with, the rest will not matter. The FE pursuit by people of low integrity does not have a prayer of success for navigating the innumerable hazards that await the candidate. There are far more pretenders than contenders in the field, and the promise and perils of the FE pursuit are too overwhelming for most people to navigate for more than a few minutes.

More than thirty years after I began dreaming of changing the energy industry, I published a framework to organize the thousands of reactions to the idea of FE that I have witnessed, and I will refer to it for the remainder of this essay. Several years after publishing that framework, I have yet to find a reaction that does not fit fairly well into that framework’s categories.

The first level of awareness of FE is no awareness at all. Dennis spoke on hundreds of talk radio shows in the early 1990s between his stints in jail and prison, mounted national ad campaigns, barnstormed the USA repeatedly, and engaged in many other activities. There have been several national TV shows about Dennis, but they were all smear campaigns, as nearly all media coverage was, often featuring a “skeptic” who made up lies about Dennis and concocted new lies when the old ones were exposed. Some have argued that any awareness is better than none at all, but I have my doubts. Whether the attention was good or bad, many millions of Americans have at least heard of FE, in no small measure because of Dennis, but even the movie The Incredibles featured zero-point energy. It is safe to say that many Americans, maybe even more than half, have at least heard of FE in some way. Some have simply not heard of it, others would not care even if they heard of it, and even most people who heard of it probably regard it as a cartoon fantasy, and that is just how the GCs like it. Their goal is to keep as large a fraction of the population at that level of awareness as possible. If the herd is not even restless or has any idea in what direction freedom might lie, it is exceedingly easy to manage.

Then there is the population’s fraction that has heard of FE and consciously considered the idea as a real possibility, and by far the most common reaction is to use their ideologies of choice to quickly dismiss it. Resorting to dismissals rooted in nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are the most common that I have seen, and are reflexive actions, where the idea leaves their awareness almost as fast as it arrived, similar to Orwell’s Memory Hole. Those who never heard of FE and those who immediately dismiss it with reflexive reactions comprise more than 99% of today’s global and Western population.

Some people are more thoughtful, who donate to seemingly worthy causes and genuinely care about what is happening in the world, at least enough to not reflexively dismiss FE. When they hear of FE, they may ask their scientist relatives and associates what they know about it, they might contact their favorite environmental organization, and the like. The reply almost invariably is that FE is “impossible” or would be used to destroy the planet through either warfare or environmental destruction, and they are advised to seek elsewhere for solutions to the world’s problems, and those seekers dutifully drop the subject. They trust those authority figures, and FE seemed all-too-fantastic anyway, and such people generally fall into the political liberal category. If they live in the West, and I know the USA best, they probably listen to NPR and watch PBS and the BBC, and follow the news on some “progressive” sites.

Those levels of awareness have either no knowledge or gain only a superficial understanding of the issues before succumbing to their conditioning and trusting various authorities. The next level of denial is the most intelligent one and includes recognized experts in their fields, and most scientists and academics have their FE awareness at that level, if they are aware at all. They are often those whom those thoughtful progressives asked for their opinion on FE. Their responses include invoking the “laws of physics” and other reasons why FE is “impossible,” and they irrationally dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” Many breakthroughs in science and technology were often called “impossible,” even after they were achieved, with the reception afforded the Wright brothers actually open-minded compared to the how the idea of FE is received today in such circles. Brian beseeched his peers to simply entertain the idea of FE. He had access that I never will, and interacted with colleagues at the very top of world-class scientific, academic, and environmental organizations. Only after several years of experiencing the often-violent reactions of denial from that group did Brian begin to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species. I also beat my head against similar walls for many years, and their naïveté and circular reasoning were probably the most dismaying aspects of their responses, as they came from people supposedly worldly and intelligent. When I approached one academic who at least mentioned FE as a possibility, and who cited situations that I had been involved with, his reaction was stunning. That group, as a whole, might be the last to accept FE’s reality, which is similar to what the Brookings Institute warned NASA about regarding the UFO/ET issue.

For those who at least admit that FE is possible, probably the most common response is that they want an FE device to power their home, or one to study in their laboratory. I want one too, and such responses are no help at all for making FE happen. Who would not want a quadrillion dollar technology delivered to their home? Those were the equivalent of Dennis’s customers under his shared savings programs. Their “skin in the game” was waiting for a miraculous and world-shaking technology to be delivered to them, preferably for free.

Probably the next most common reaction for those not denying that FE is possible is those who fear FE (they may outnumber those who will gladly accept FE delivered to their homes and labs). Their fears are usually stated to be around weaponizing FE or using it to destroy Earth’s remaining ecosystems. However, that reaction seemed to camouflage other, deeper fears. I have never succeeded in engaging such people in rational conversation regarding those fears. I eventually came to suspect that they really feared abundance, and seemed addicted to scarcity. They built their entire lives around surviving in a world of scarcity, and saw abundance as a threat to their existence. Such reactions are like the GCs’, and for seemingly similar reasons. They know the world will end with FE, they are afraid that their role in that new world will be diminished, and prefer the devil they know, and in some cases are that devil.

Those various reactions are not mutually exclusive, as some people will react with combinations of them, and the fear of FE is often espoused by those who have sophisticated objections to the idea of FE, with their reaction along the lines of: “FE is impossible, thankfully, because if we had it, we would only destroy ourselves and the planet with it.”

The people in those aforementioned categories comprise around 99.99% of humanity at this time. The next levels of my framework describe people actually trying to do something about the situation, and they all have my respect, even if their motivation may be to get rich and famous and other self-serving motivations, or they are naïve. Everybody that I respect in this field began their journeys naively. Naïveté is no crime, and I greatly respect people who lost their naïveté honestly, usually by trying to make the world a better place. I lost mine the hard way. However, naïveté is dangerous in this field, and I am attempting to mount an effort where naïveté will be less hazardous for its participants, although it still needs to be shed.

In the awareness level of people doing something or planning to, is the naïve level of thinking that the energy industry will welcome innovative technology, and that organized suppression does not exist. This plays into the capitalist canard that the world is constantly seeking the better mousetrap. Some people are looking, not to bring them to market, but instead to ensure that they never do. Wiping out the competition is the essence of capitalism. After having his companies stolen many times, surviving Mafia hit attempts (1, 2) and the like, Dennis believed the electric companies’ propaganda in Washington State in the wake of the biggest municipal bond default in U.S. history to that time. He devoted great effort toward interesting the electric companies in the kind of energy conservation that their full-page ads stated that they desperately needed, thinking that he would get a tickertape parade. In the midst of trying to interest the electric companies, an anonymous party began wrecking his business relationships, and just as he entered into a large deal with a finance company, the electric companies unmasked themselves and went public in their attacks on Dennis’s company. Among the many attacks that came simultaneously from Washington State’s power structure, a professional provocateur with fake alternative energy credentials infiltrated Dennis’s company and was subsequently responsible for the death of one of Dennis’s employees, which was Dennis’s radicalizing moment in his energy adventures.

Sparky Sweet, a career scientist at General Electric, also believed that the energy industry would welcome his solid-state FE device. He mailed working prototypes to the big energy institutions, expecting a tickertape parade. The opposite happened, with shadowy interests destroying his business deals, similar to Dennis’s experience. Sparky did not take the hint and kept trying, which led to death threats. After their final threats, Sparky fled into hiding, where Brian visited him, and Sparky died the next week of a “heart attack.” Dying that way has been common among FE contenders who played near Sparky’s level. Dennis, Sparky, and many others like them lost their naïveté the hard way, but the field has been filled with newcomers who deny the reality of organized suppression as they charge forward with visions of riches and fame. It is perhaps the most common level of awareness where FE newcomers will be found. Most never develop anything worth suppressing, so will never know any differently, and will enter and leave the field with that naïve level of awareness intact, which was once the most common one in the field. However, with enough people trying and either living to tell the tale or others chronicling their dire fates, which often included untimely deaths, and the Internet spreading information like never before, few FE newcomers have much excuse for being unaware of the fates of their professional ancestors.

The next level of awareness might be more dangerous than the previous one, where FE newcomers realize that there is organized suppression, but they think that they are clever enough, lucky enough, or have some other unique quality that will allow them to avoid the suppression, usually by playing secrecy games. One fellow traveler invented an FE prototype in a nuclear laboratory and was fired the next day. He was the same age as I was when I began my baptism of fire in Los Angeles to begin my career, and he persisted, which led to more rigorous attention. He then tried the “sneak past them” approach, to be rudely disabused of his idea. Years later, he talked to fellow travelers and began understanding the magnitude of what he stumbled into. He realized that he was like a kindergartener that ran onto the field during an NFL game, thinking that he could play with the men. Today’s FE newcomers often begin in this level, and I hear no end of plans to sneak past the organized suppression, run past it so fast that the suppressors will not know what hit them, and many other adolescent fantasies. I probably see that delusion the most often anymore, which is similar to 18-year-old boys pining to prove their manhood on the battlefield.

The next level of awareness might be the most common among people progressing beyond denial of FE’s possibility or existence. They believe that the situation is hopeless and that there is no point in even trying. They are often those building bunkers to survive the coming collapse of global civilization. I have some respect for that position, but it certainly will not help solve humanity’s problems or help the Fifth Epochal Event manifest. Nobody that I respect in the FE field ever felt hopeless. We all began our journeys naïvely, but we never conceded defeat. When the night was the darkest during my journey, then the miracle happened, so admitting defeat before even beginning does not seem productive or even realistic, and can lead to dysfunctional coping behaviors and even suicidal tendencies.

The next level of awareness is similar to those fantasies that organized suppression can be avoided or outmaneuvered. The people in this category are almost all men, and men comprise more than 90% of the FE field today, which is one of its pitfalls. The people at this level of awareness believe that they can defeat the GCs in battle, expose them, and other silly ideas, similar to that fresh meat hankering for the battlefield. I call them the Young Warriors, and when they arrive with their armor and weapons, the only outcome that you can guarantee is that when those weapons get used, they will be used on you or the Young Warriors will use them on each other, as the GCs view the carnage with amusement, and happily reflect on how easy the organized suppression game is, when their targets do almost all of their work for them. The only warriors of any potential benefit to an FE effort have abandoned coercion and adopted persuasion, usually because they have experienced enough battles and discovered the complete futility of coercion.

The next level of awareness is where Dennis, Brian, and I spent many years, and Dennis and Brian largely stayed at that level while I finally had to admit that it did not work and was unlikely to, which led to my current strategy. That level is the mass movement mentality. Dennis and Brian drank deeply at the well of their nationalist indoctrination, as have others with my great respect, as they almost all began their journeys as overgrown Boy Scouts. Dennis tried forming movements around Christian ideology early in his journey, and even tried it again recently. He also tried the “patriot” approach, and almost all of his efforts either involved risk-free (to the customer) marketing plans, business opportunities, or both. Dennis appealed to all three of the most prominent population management ideologies in the USA to attract interest in and involvement with his efforts. I helped Brian found a non-profit mass movement to raise awareness of FE, and it was the last time that I ever will try the mass movement approach. I found that mass movements, by their very nature, appeal to lowest-common-denominator beliefs to form movement “cohesion.” Unfortunately, those beliefs are usually false, as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are built on lies, half-truths, and self-serving myths. Nothing resembling enlightenment comes from such ideologies, and I came to believe that enlightenment is the missing ingredient, and the necessary prerequisite for enlightenment is a caring heart. Without that caring heart, the rest will not matter.

When I lived with Dennis in Boston, during my naïve days, when I was also mildly susceptible to delusions of grandeur, Dennis said that “the people” innately cared, but had nothing worth caring about, which was why they danced to the tune of the Establishment’s indoctrination and conditioning, often without much enthusiasm. With little other frame of reference yet, I believed Dennis. I had my naïveté harshly purged during the next few years and received my life’s primary lesson. A decade later, Dennis finally coaxed me into working with him again, which did not last long and I nearly went to prison for my trouble, as the GCs raised the game to a new level of sophistication. When I was with Dennis that time, he admitted that almost nobody really cared, but he was sifting through the mine tailings of humanity, looking for gold nuggets. Mr. Professor and his wife were two of the three that he said he found, with me being the other (and Dennis’s wife, whose journey has been more difficult than Dennis’s in ways). While that may seem a great honor, it is actually one of the loneliest feelings in the world, and a reason why humanity’s prospects may be dimmer than any want to admit. But I have not given up, and this essay will form a cornerstone of what may be my final effort to help right the global ship.

There is another level worth mentioning, where the aspirant is overwhelmed with delusions of grandeur, believing himself to be the messiah, or planning to become the Bill Gates of FE, and even billionaires are susceptible to that delusion, as they play their games of fake philanthropy and insatiable greed.

Only after many years of carrying spears for Dennis and Brian and trying my own efforts did I arrive at my current strategy, which has not been tried before that I know of. It is the enlightenment route to FE. Few on Earth today are very enlightened or saintly, if anybody really is, but striving for those goals is where the key to helping FE manifest in public may lie. Many inventors have publicly demonstrated working FE prototypes, but they were all quickly silenced or otherwise removed from the scene, and violence has commonly been applied, although it is less common than it used to be, as the GCs’ bag of suppression tricks has become more sophisticated.

Before discussing my current approach, I will present the state of the FE field today, which also helps explain why I am taking my approach. Dennis and I began our FE journeys largely ignorant of our predecessors and really did not know that there was an FE field, but we began hearing about it soon enough, as people approached us with hair-raising tales of woe. Their stories were not only about FE, but any technologies that various oligarchies believed threatened their rackets, from high-MPG cars to windmill farms to innovate mining techniques and even to low-water toilets. We heard of FE inventors having their entire families murdered, with their homes burned down and bulldozed, inventors thrown in jail on the flimsiest pretexts and many other outrages, primarily occurring in the USA, the Land of the Free. It began to become monotonous. Before long, we were taken out in one of the more spectacular snuff jobs in the entire history of FE attempts. My life was ruined, and my partner who helped me spring Dennis from jail had his life wrecked and shortened. The carnage spread far and wide, with distantly peripheral players having their lives wrecked, and I still hear sad stories from participants until this very day.

While the media had libeled Dennis since I met him, what initially shocked me as I became aware of the FE field was that leading voices in the FE field also libeled Dennis. They were not little white lies, but Big Lies that served as centerpieces of their attacks. When the libelers were confronted with their lies, sometimes by me, they either gave the challengers the finger or made up more lies. I also watched big names in the field eagerly embrace the libelers and their lies while they attacked Dennis and Brian. They essentially acted like the psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll who were sicced on us over the years. Those behaviors only reinforced the primary lesson of my journey, and provided more evidence that the enemy is us. What was probably more disconcerting was naïve FE newcomers and enthusiasts actually handing me one libel tract in particular as an example of great writing about the FE issue (!). That libel tract has been presented to me around twenty times. The gullibility and naïveté of those in the FE field, combined with libelers and other criminals in the ranks, are partly why, soon before he died, Brian said that if anybody brings FE to the world, it will not be people in the field today. I became attracted to Brian’s work when I read his Miracle in the Void, and for the first time that I could recall, somebody in the FE field wrote about Dennis without lying about him.

Wade Frazier
2nd May 2014, 12:21
What Has Not Worked So Far, and What Might – Part 2
All the low-integrity activities in the FE field aside, it has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive. When the GCs wiped us out in 1988, what made us dangerous was not so much the technology we were working on; we were building a network of businesses that could manufacture and distribute disruptive energy technologies, and Sparky Sweet lived right down the road from us. If we became too prominent to easily snuff out, plenty of people like Sparky could have come forward. That was the primary threat that we presented, led by Dennis’s ingenious methods and his unparalleled courage.

Other than Dennis and a few others, the FE field has generally been dominated by inventors and scientists. It was similar to the super heat pump “industry” when Dennis arrived on the scene. The traditional solar industry also attacked Dennis when he sold the world’s best heating system. Everybody saw Dennis as a threat, not only the energy oligarchy led by the GCs, but “competitors” in the alternative energy field and those scientists and inventors who libeled Dennis. Today, I cannot currently recommend anybody in the FE field. There are some worthy players in the milieu, but their approach has never come close to working. I will survey some of the pitfalls that FE aspirants regularly fall into, and stumbling into them can be life-wrecking or fatal.

The GCs are merely the apex predator in an political-economic jungle filled with predators. If the GCs are Godzilla, then the jungles are also filled with tyrannosaurs, velociraptors, and the many docile herbivores that they feast on, with some furtive creatures eking out existences on the margins. Most Americans have no awareness of the issue, but the USA’s federal government has classified thousands of patents, largely energy-related patents, according to credible sources. This 1971 guide for classifying patented technologies extended to photovoltaics that had efficiencies of greater than 10% or any energy conversion technology that achieved higher than a 70-80% efficiency. FE devices are often called “over-unity” because they produce more energy than it takes to run them. Consequently, any over-unity device was subject to being classified, and Sparky Sweet’s device was 10,000,000,000% efficient, which was a little over the threshold for classifying it. Sparky never patented his device and kept it proprietary, avoiding seizure that way, but that leads to other problems. Thousands of energy technology inventors have had their patented devices seized under the national security laws, and that is merely the tip of the iceberg of what has been suppressed. What got Steven Greer, the founder of the Disclosure Project, pursuing FE was when he met with a faction of the GCs. The meeting was in the early 1990s, and in 2004, I heard Greer report on his conversations with them, and one disclosure was that the GCs had paid $100 billion in bribes to sequester disruptive technologies over the years, and energy technologies above all. When I heard Greer say that, it made perfect sense to me, as Dennis rejected two offers that I know of, I even heard of others in casual conversations with corporate co-workers, and I heard plenty of other such tales. The amount might be $200 billion by now. Those taking the money have donned the “Golden Handcuffs,” as that money bought their silence and their technology was usually shelved, usually with the “seller” being unaware of the true nature of the “sale.” But even Golden Handcuffs are a fair ways down the path of organized suppression. As I heard from Tom Bearden in 1998, the GCs’ bag of tricks is deep, and many low-cost strategies can be tried before they resort to using Golden Handcuffs, using the patent office to seize technologies, and in the relatively rare instance, violence. Kangarooing Dennis into prison and then making “mistakes” that put him in with murderers, is one of many techniques at their disposal, and such treatment can often be free-lance malice engaged in by “public servants” and other Establishment figures, without them needing to be instructed or compensated by the GCs, or even being aware of the evil interests that their actions serve. They probably would not care if they even knew, and many would solicit “employment” if they knew how valuable their activities were to rich and powerful interests, no matter if those activities eventually made Earth uninhabitable.

When the GCs’ minions engage in lethal interventions, either by direct murder or throwing people such as Dennis into a shark tank and letting “nature” take its course, what seems to be more important than killing the target in any particular attempt is making it appear to be something other than premeditated murder. I am not at liberty to publicly disclose details of numerous murder attempts that have been described to me either from the target or second-hand by highly credible associates, but it is not easy to murder somebody and make it look like something else (accident, random crime, suicide, heart attack, cancer, etc.), and if an attempt initially fails, the assassins will not “double tap” them like more mundane assassins will, such as the Mafia, as it removes any doubt that it was premeditated murder. If the target survives the initial attempt, the assassins will withdraw and try again another time, as making it look like something else is more important than being successful with any one attempt. That is likely why some FE activists have survived numerous murder attempts; Dennis should be dead many times over, and he has survived several outright murder attempts, and few were likely Global Controller attempts, but from other interests. Also, a failed attempt can often have the desired effect, which was disabling the target from doing anything productive in the disruptive technology field, FE most of all. Lives have been shortened and wrecked by “failed” attempts, and another attempt was unnecessary. These are not Walter Mitty or paranoid fantasies, but the territory that too many FE aspirants have encountered. I do not like hearing about them, and neither did Brian, but he knew about 25 dead inventor stories.

Nobody has ever mounted more auspicious or persistent attempts at the businessman’s route to alternative and free energy than Dennis’s. If Dennis could not do it, I do not know who can. But today’s FE field is filled with inventors with dreams of fame and fortune, who think they are the messiah, who apply for patents, try to raise money, and so on. I have never seen one of them with a prayer of success and I try to ignore them, but I am bombarded with news of the inventor-of-the-hour by various FE enthusiasts and dabblers. During the month that I drafted this essay’s chapter, I was informed of the activities of no less than half-dozen aspirants and their technologies, with FE being the usual technology, but the “news” can also include high-MPG cars. They are all the same paths to disaster that I have survived, witnessed, read of, and heard of. A famous quote attributed to Einstein and Ben Franklin, among others, is that insanity is performing the same act repeatedly, expecting a different outcome each time. The entire FE and alternative energy field suffers from that insanity, trying the same approaches literally tens of thousands of times, each time thinking that they will succeed. What makes that situation slightly more justified is that few survive the first failure to try again, so the field is “weeded out” that way, and the organized suppression is usually so subtle that its targets do not even realized that they were suppressed. However, it is long past time for a different approach and, refreshingly, there have been baby steps in the direction that I will advocate, made by various members of the field.

In summary, here are some approaches that have never come close to working and likely never will, and why:

1. Patenting an FE invention:

a. For FE machines, patents are generally denied on the “laws of physics” objection, even though it is an a priori way to reject a patent application, declaring it impossible as a starting point;
b. The applicants have announced their self-serving intentions, and organized suppression almost effortlessly defeats the self-interested;
c. Patents can be granted and then seized using national security laws, and inventors can go to prison if they keep developing their inventions, in an Orwellian twist;
2. Not patenting an FE invention and keeping it proprietary:

a. Keeping technology secret is the same game that the GCs play; Western “medicine” went through a proprietary medicine craze, where snake oil and other secret-ingredient “medicines” were sold, and there are unscrupulous people in the FE field who sell the snake-oil equivalent of FE;
b. Genuine FE inventors who really have something are often tarred with the same brush as the charlatans when they play the proprietary technology game;
c. The only people in the dark when FE inventors play the proprietary technology game is the public; whatever the FE inventor built, the GCs developed to a commercial level at least fifty years ago, and they have the 35th generation of the technology of what the FE inventor built in his garage; such inventors are either oblivious to that reality or they think that somehow they will be allowed to succeed, and often harbor the rest of those 18-year-old fantasies; people such as Sparky Sweet took their “secret sauce” proprietary information to their graves with them, unwittingly making the GCs’ job pretty easy, as they self-suppressed their technology;
d. Identically with those applying for patents, those playing the proprietary technology game have announced their self-interest and are easily suppressed by the GC’s bag of tricks;
3. Raising money from capitalistic sources (venture capital, stock sales, and other kinds of investors, including customers):

a. Receiving money from investors, customers, and the like is a quick way to go to prison on trumped up charges (1, 2);
b. If inventors try that route, they will eventually lose the rights to their technologies to their investors; even for normal inventing, inventors rarely profit from their inventions, and for FE inventing, it is well-nigh impossible;
c. If the invention has promise for making FE, some investors will undoubtedly be agents of organized suppression or garden-variety organized crime;
d. With capitalistic efforts, members of the effort regularly become seduced by the immensity of FE’s potential, and the Treasure of the Sierra Madre effect arises, and the effort collapses in an frenzy of self-destructive greed;
4. Finding rich philanthropists:

a. “Rich philanthropist” is an oxymoron; there are probably no truly “rich philanthropists” active on Earth today;
b. For the few that may have wanted to help fund FE efforts, the GCs quickly dissuaded them; that avenue has rarely been successfully navigated that I know of, and never at a level where it will make a difference for making FE happen;
5. Sneaking past the GCs:

a. They have global surveillance capabilities second to none, and cannot be snuck past;
b. The very attempt to sneak past them is an adolescent fantasy that usually leads to paranoia and other foibles, and the effort’s self-destruction;
6. A guerilla revolution led by garage inventors possessing blueprints for building FE prototypes:

a. Making a viable FE prototype is far harder than it might seem – relatively few garage tinkerers ever develop anything worth suppressing, and even then usually wreck their lives in the process, before any suppression techniques need to be applied;
b. Many inventors have demonstrated FE prototypes, but for those not immediately subjected to suppression activity (often the violent kind), the gulf between a working prototype and something for public use is more than $100 million of development;
c. Contrary to rumors that abound and related myths, there is no army of garage tinkerers waiting for the blueprints to go build one, that will organize into an effective effort;
7. Mounting a mass movement around ideologies such as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion:

a. Those ideologies are seated in scarcity-based, self-serving, and fearful assumptions, and the GCs have masterfully used those ideologies to control the masses; out-herding the master shepherd with his own tools is very unlikely;
b. Because those ideologies all cater to self-interest, the effort attracts those of corrupt motivation from the outset and are easily defeated by organized suppression, if they do not internally collapse before then;
c. Scarcity-based ideologies are old skins that will not hold the new wine;
8. Trying to conquer the organized suppression:

a. Only extremely foolish men in thrall to adolescent fantasies consider this approach, and its immature, battle-oriented perspective will defeat the effort before it begins;
b. The only casualties will be those adolescent warriors and those they are allegedly trying to help; the GCs are not threatened by such approaches;
9. Media campaigns:

a. The media is a key part of the global power structure, and it again is their tool, not the activists’;
b. For every dollar an activist spends on media campaigns, the power structure can spend a hundred times as much to overwhelm the effort with negative coverage, not to mention unleashing the legal system and other assets against the media effort;
10. The hero’s or messiah’s journey:

a. It is an archetypal role that almost nobody on Earth is qualified to play, and many are easily seduced into thinking that they are the messiah or world’s hero; it again appeals to men, especially young ones; megalomania is a hazard for this approach;
b. For the few who are qualified for such a role/task, one hero/messiah against the GCs does not stand a chance;
11. Hosting conferences to raise awareness:

a. Such conferences are crawling with agents of various interests, including the CIA and other intelligence organizations, the GCs, and local, state, and federal law enforcement acting on behalf of various interests, none of whom are allies and are usually intent on destroying the effort;
b. Attempted murder of key conference figures before, during, or immediately after the conference is all-too-common;
c. Those attending the conferences rarely have agendas in alignment with the conference organizers’ intention; groupies and other celebrity chasers attend, many come for the show or to fill their social needs, and many unwary and gullible participants easily fall under the spell of psychopathic agents that infiltrate the effort to help take it down from the inside, usually striking when the attacks come from the outside, and many attend to survey the effort, to see how they can dominate/steal it;
12. Beseeching the world’s governments for assistance, particularly their military arms:

a. They are usually among those sending their agents to conferences;
b. They all answer, at some level, to the GCs, although few in those organizations are aware of the GCs in the slightest;
c. Washington D.C. activists often end up dead, and others have “enjoyed” somewhat less dire fates (1, 2 – Brian and Dennis were run out of the USA for their efforts), but I have never heard of D.C. activism in these areas with a happy ending;
13. Beseeching corporate, environmental, charitable, scientific, or academic institutions:

a. They all have ideological commitments to their scarcity-based frames of reference, and they almost always view FE either as the enemy, or impossible because of the “laws of physics,” or they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” and they have other reactions of denial; they are the groups often most resistant the very idea of FE;
b. In summary, there are not any organizations not already devoted to FE that have allied with FE efforts or are likely to.

I have seen it all, and watched them play out with varying levels of dismay. They are all methods of either giving our power away to someone or something else, pouring the new wine into old skins, and generally acting from a scarcity-based and victim-oriented perspective, and they have not worked and are unlikely to. Newcomers invariably advocate some kind of shortcut, an easy path to the finish line. None exist. The Fifth Epochal Event is not something that can be initiated in an afternoon, a month, or a year of effort, and I have watched many lifetimes expended in the pursuit, including mine. Nothing about this is easy, and I have helped the best of the best expend their lives trying. With a sufficient nugget of enlightenment, it could be an easy task, but achieving that state is the hard part. Humanity is far from an enlightened species at this time.

For several years, I have stated that the only inventor-oriented approach with a prayer is for an inventor with the goods (a viable prototype undoubtedly generating FE) to give it to a worthy group so that they can take it the rest of the way, past humanity’s inertia and any organized suppression that might be inflicted on the effort. I have never heard of the inventor with the goods willing to give it away, and that worthy group does not yet exist, and my efforts can be seen as trying to help form it. Hectoring the inventor with the goods unwilling to give it away, if there is nobody worth giving it to, is not productive.

Many years ago, after surviving my FE adventures, beginning to understand the milieu and trading notes with fellow travelers, I began to suspect that what I had experienced on the mundane level of discovering that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity was only a hint of something far more vast, my numerous paranormal events aside. I got the sense that the zero-point field was divine in nature, and if an intelligent species did not approach the issue with sufficient divine intention, they could not access the field or access it for long. The GCs might be doing humanity a favor, acting as some kind of integrity threshold that humanity must clear before the path to FE will open. Ten like Dennis or a hundred like Brian combining their efforts, and the world would have had FE by now, but there are probably not that many like them on Earth. I began to suspect that the problem was really a lack of integrity and enlightenment, in ways that go far beyond practical notions of those issues. I have consequently been trying to walk and advocate the enlightenment route. Mine is more from an academic/activist perspective, not a messianic or mystical master approach, or the hero’s journey. But the masters’ teachings, at least those that the priesthoods have not distorted, I believe are highly relevant. Some kind of spiritual grounding is probably necessary to pursue FE, but I would not advocate receiving it through organized religions. If love is understood as the best of all possible feelings, and acts from the heart are recognized as the most powerful that we can achieve, that is probably sufficient spiritual understanding, and achieving some mystical experiences may be critical for awakening the aspirant. Anything less than a divinely intended approach toward FE may not work, for reasons far beyond organized suppression or the public’s inertia. That is just an impression that slowly dawned on me, which I cannot prove to anybody, but it guides my thinking and efforts. Also, sources I respect have stated that the means become the ends, which is consistent with what I learned during my adventures.

Several years ago, as I began studying for writing this essay in earnest, I happened upon a book published by an oil company, believe it or not, which helped me crystallize this essay’s epochal approach. The Second Epochal Event was missing from the author’s account, as well as the Fifth, of course, but in a discussion of socio-technical development, the author listed four different “vectors” of technological development, which he described as: Discovery, Invention, Innovation, and Diffusion. They corresponded to scientific discoveries, creating inventions, marketing them, and people using them. I have witnessed organized suppression in each vector.

The GCs are actively mischievous, but any FE effort that makes them the central focus will likely fail. They need to be treated as a force of nature; respected and avoided when possible, but a storm or earthquake can always appear out of nowhere, and we are vulnerable to them and can only, at best, try to reduce our risk to them. The GCs cannot be fought, negotiated with, snuck past, or outsmarted. They can only be made obsolete, and a world based on abundance will do that, and even they can be redeemed, which would be my ideal outcome. Brian might have said it best when he said that a successful FE effort will rely on “combined positive intention,” not the “complaint-based” orientation of protestors, the conflict orientation of the Young Warriors, and the like. We need to begin by aiming high and do our best to maintain that high level, and avoid being drug into the mire. A creator’s mindset, not a victim’s, is needed.

With all those paths that have led to nowhere so far, why do I think that my attempt will not be another dead-end? It could well be, but it is at least a new route and it should be harmless, which I highly value; I have seen enough carnage in this lifetime and do not want to be responsible for any more wrecked or prematurely ended lives. After many years of being in the trenches, trading notes, and watching from afar, I noticed that these were the primary problems that FE activists such as Dennis and Brian faced:

1. The vast majority of humanity does not know anything about FE and does not want to know, with several levels of disinterest and denial, ranging from outright uncaring to sophisticated arguments for why FE is either impossible or dangerous;
2. For those that have at least a passing interest in FE, they were almost always scientifically illiterate and did not really appreciate the role of energy in today’s world, its role in shaping the past, both the journey of life on Earth and the human journey, and hence did not really understand FE’s transformative potential and were easily distracted;
3. For those with some idea of FE’s potential, there were numerous pitfalls in their perspectives that ended up harming FE efforts, which included:

a. Their ignorance of how the world’s political-economic dynamics really worked, from how markets are controlled to how political establishments work to how organized suppression works, at the local, state, national, and global levels;
b. Their naïveté of how their family, friends, and colleagues would react to the idea of FE and abundance;
c. Their inability to understand that scarcity-based ideologies were not aligned with manifesting a situation of abundance; those ideologies might work for most “activism,” but the perils and temptations of FE, as well as the organized suppression, have proven too formidable for those kinds of approaches;
d. They could not relinquish their self-serving orientation to the issue, and became seduced by greed, delusions of grandeur, and other ego-traps;
e. Their inability to understand the truly epochal nature of FE, which likely meant that only an epochal approach might work; the standard methods of the capitalistic, governmental, “philanthropic,” and environmental organizations would not work for developing and bringing FE to the world;
f. They would get stuck in today’s arrested development in the field, where it is focused on scientists, inventors, business opportunities, and retail politics, and various New Age aspects of it;
4. For those making any headway on the issue of raising public awareness of FE and developing FE technology for public use, they will encounter organized suppression, but only when they become relatively successful will the top-shelf assets be brought to bear; most organized suppression happens at the local, state, and national levels, not the GC level.

Money only buys somebody’s effort, and when FE efforts have been starved of money, as they all have been, it is a tacit admission that not enough people will be involved because they understand the issue’s importance and care, but they must be bribed to become involved. Even that $100-200 million gulf between a working prototype and something ready for public use is an admission that people will not help unless they are paid to, which is really not much help at all.

What follows is whom I am looking for and what I plan to ask them to help me with; I am looking for:

• People who deeply care about healing humanity and the planet (they are far less common than mainstream society believes);
• They do not pass the buck of responsibility to others, thinking that someplace in the world is an organization that cares and can save the day, and that their contribution is not needed; if you deeply care, you are greatly needed;
• People who have had some kind of awakening experience, usually which showed them that their conditioning was an indoctrination into ways of thinking so that they could be controlled; once they can see through one of them, the others are easier to recognize; perhaps the hardest one to see through, particularly for “smart” people, is the rationalist-materialist paradigm usually taught to scientists (also called logical positivism); having the direct personal experience of a mystical awakening usually breaks through that indoctrination, but there is also professional peril, as those awakening in that way no longer “drink the Kool-Aid” of mainstream science, and their careers can end due to their disenchantment or through ostracism and outright firing and professional blackballing, if they do not remain quiet about their expanded orientation;
• People with the mental horsepower necessary to think in complex enough terms so that they can understand the rudiments presented in this essay and can preferably master aspects of it; understanding the scientific arguments and evidence in this essay is about the level that I think is needed, which is far less rigorous training than professional scientists receive, but should be sufficient to begin thinking in comprehensive terms;
• People with some kind of experience in the real world that helped them shed the naïveté that usually accompanies the indoctrinated state noted above; naïveté is a potentially fatal affliction in this field, and being able to recognize the psychopaths who will be attracted to efforts that I will mount (either as opportunists or those on the payroll of organized suppression, and there will also be functional psychopaths who believe that they are saving the world by wiping out FE, and will use any means they deem necessary to achieve their goals), will be a critical faculty.

What I plan to ask of those that I attract to my work, and what I plan to have them do, is:

• Read this essay and dive deeply on as many areas as possible, in order to begin to develop comprehensive perspectives, particularly the roles of energy and consciousness;
• Do enough homework and investigation to satisfy themselves that FE technology is at least possible, usually without being able to lay their hands on a working FE prototype and watching it in action; this is one of the harder tasks, and usually awakening experiences are necessary to begin to understand how organized suppression works, how much chaff there is for every grain of wheat on the fringes (so much that the wheat is hard to find), and other issues where people usually have to go deeply and get their hands dirty, and even be misled on an issue or two before they get to the bottom of it, to understand the process; but they will usually have to get to the bottom of at least one issue and find that it is valid, even though it may be marginalized and pilloried by the Establishment;
• Begin to understand, in as comprehensive terms as possible, what FE’s potential is;
• Because my work is freely available to the public, people can digest it anonymously and quietly, and that is good work, too; however, for those whom I will ask to be in the “choir,” they will not be anonymous, and I am going to ask them to “sing” the song of abundance in cyberspace, and will seek to have the abundance song sung in a chorus of thousands, which has never happened on Earth before;
• That song will attract people who have longed for it for their entire lives, and if it can attract tens of thousands of people, preferably about 100,000 of them, then it will be time to take action and support a technical effort to develop FE technology for public use;
• That development effort will be non-profit, and whatever is developed will be open-source and given away, not sold; only a few will need to be given away before the Fifth Epochal Event will manifest.

Once a mass-production-ready FE device is developed, with 100,000 people maintaining their focus on the issue (and probably contributing financially, but with that many, nobody will contribute at levels where they suffer financially – and this stage only happens far down the path, probably at least several years into the future, if not more), the Fifth Epochal Event will be here, and that group’s “heroics” will no longer be needed and the fun can begin. As with the previous epochal events, the appearance of new energy technology that could harness the new energy source always was the event, which tapped a level usually an order of magnitude above the previously achieved level. It will likely be no different this time, and as with the other epochal events, a tiny fraction of humanity will initiate the event, it will be copied by the rest of humanity, and it will transform humanity in ways that were unimaginable before the epochal event.

For today’s global civilization, 100,000 people amounts to about 0.001% of humanity, or 1-in-70,000 people. For the 5,000-7,000 people that I hope can form the “choir,” they only have to be one-in-a-million. Can one-in-a-million muster the integrity and complex awareness to understand abundance and sing the song? I think so. I think it might be as high as one-in-five-thousand, which means that there are 200 times as many potential singers on Earth as might be needed. I will take those odds. I am virtually certain that if I can find and train 5,000-7,000 singers that can attract an audience with the right stuff of 100,000 or so (that 100,000 will also develop enough of a comprehensive, abundance-based perspective, that they will understand the issue’s importance and keep their focus and will not be distracted, but nobody needs to be a hero). Meetings outside of cyberspace will eventually happen, but far later than most will think or likely want. The “let’s have a conference” mentality can fatal for the effort in its early stages.

Perhaps the majority of the GCs are quietly hoping that efforts like this are successful, while the dark heart of that organization has dismissed the potential of what I am trying. I can only hope that potential suppressors underestimate the power of love. I am planning to survive this attempt. So far, I have not seen or heard of people in the West merely writing about these issues suffering untimely deaths and other dire fates. I have had my own Internet stalkers (1, 2), some of whom were professionals, and they may be a first line of defense for a strategy that can turn violent, but I am gambling that it will not. I am likely only risking my life, however, and nobody else’s, although I will likely have to rudely dissuade gung-ho newcomers and other who rush toward the pitfalls with their “bright ideas,” like those 18-year-old boys seeking glory on the battlefield. Gung-hoers and those who follow them will likely present the greatest threat to my efforts, not organized suppression. There are outlets for that newcomer mentality, and they can go see Dennis and the others trying those standard “do something” approaches. Those newcomers will only put my efforts at risk, usually by putting themselves and those around them in harm’s way, usually quite unwittingly. Those in the choir will not have to worry much about organized suppression, other than affable, silver-tongued psychopaths trying to seduce them, and I will try to limit their opportunities and help people recognize them.

The path to developing FE technology for public use outlined above I believe can work, but there are also other ways that the Fifth Epochal Event can manifest. If I had to bet on how it will manifest, I would put my money on the struggle between the darkest faction of the GCs losing to the saner members, and them beginning to release some of their sequestered technologies. The reason why their organized suppression efforts have been totally successful is that they know if any of it makes it to the public, it will only be a matter of time before the dam breaks, which would likely included ETs openly interacting with humanity. The GCs know that if any of that happens, their days of ruling humanity and Earth will quickly end. That is partly why this hump has been so hard to get over. But I am not going to wait for something to happen at that level to save us all, and what I am attempting will also help form a nucleus of awareness that can greatly help with an enlightened and harmless implementation of FE. If FE makes its appearance, its implementation will need to be led by as many enlightened and informed people as possible. Some need to be ahead of the curve, to lead the way, if only by promoting an enlightened awareness. Once a person can see FE with their owns eyes, preferably by having it delivered to their home (anything less, and they will not awaken; they will not be talked into an abundance-based mentality; they must experience it ), the awakening process should be pretty rapid, especially if there is already an abundance choir singing.

I found that if people are candidates for the choir, they are so rare that there will not be anybody in their daily lives who also is. The maximum social circle that most people can manage is a few hundred people, but I am looking for something like 1-in-5,000 (it might be as auspicious as 1-in-1,000, but I have my doubts) so the odds are that those prospective choir members will not have anybody among their families, friends, and colleagues who can also learn the song and sing it. That is just the reality of the numbers, which it took me years of harsh learning to understand. The social-circle approach will not work for what I have in mind, but I am using a new technology with a global reach to find those needles in haystacks. Also, a primary purpose of this essay is to improve the odds. I developed my current approach by trial and error that was extremely hazardous and painful, and took most of a lifetime to achieve. I hope that this essay can help shorten the learning curve for those whom I seek.

Concepts such as open-sourcing and crowdfunding have come from the Internet culture, and are steps in the right direction. Even high-tech potentates such as Bill Gates live relatively humbly. The Internet is a precursor to the kind of communication system that will be enjoyed in the Fifth Epochal Phase of the human journey. There will be others, but the Fifth Epochal Event will likely mark a fundamental shift from scarcity to abundance, and human civilization will transform in ways that nobody today can really fathom, even though there have been many hints of what that could look like (1, 2). When love and abundance reigns instead of fear and scarcity, the human journey will radically transform in ways that are currently unimaginable. Making them at least partly imaginable has become my life’s work, and time will tell if it helps move the needle or not. As the great Bucky Fuller said, we are facing utopia or oblivion. Which one will we choose?

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 00:34
Hi:

I took a little celebratory hike today, after finishing drafting that essay. Actually it was not that little, but a ten-miler that kicked my old butt. But before I started feeling my years, my photographer’s mind thought, “What would Limor like to see?” :) Attached are some pics from today with that in mind.

I live where I can run into the world’s richest man at the movie theater:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#gates

and in twenty minutes of driving I can be at a trailhead on a gorgeous mountain on a beautiful day and not see a soul. I headed to Pupu Point, where people paraglide and hang glide. Flying junkie Richard Bach flew there, and wrote about it in his book One. It was a four mile hike to Pupu Point, and I did not see one person. I saw some squirrels, however. :)

The forest was magnificent, enchanted even, with riots of flowers in bloom on the forest floor, such as violets. Pupu is popular, so I saw about a dozen hikers there. I hiked to a nearby second gliding field, and took a picture of Mount Rainier. That view from Pupu is toward Bellevue and Puget Sound. I can walk to the lake in the picture in a few minutes from my home. I am also attaching, in the next post (Avalon limitations), a picture of the Olympics taken from my neighborhood where I lived several years ago. I could see some of that from my living room window.

After Pupu, I hiked another trail for a couple of miles, where I again, did not see anybody. I saw deer tracks, however. Some hiking buddies have even encountered bears on that mountain. Last summer, I brought a pal out from Europe and his big goal was photographing deer. He probably got sick of seeing deer before the trip was over, but I took him to a meadow where he got the wildlife scoop of his life, where there was a yearling bear in the meadow, pic attached in next post. Even I do not see bears all that often, but have had some close encounters, one which was dangerous. But what almost all people in these mountains die of is poor judgment, and many die in the mountains each year. The primarily die of falls, drowning, and getting lost and dying of exposure. Such vast wilderness areas, with very vertical mountains where it can snow on any day of the year, close to a major metropolitan area, where inexperienced and unprepared people sally forth, is a deadly combination. If people keep their wits about them, it is all quite safe.

While my journey has not been easy, I have been richly compensated. Several years ago, somebody got me a subscription to Backpacker Magazine. Almost every month it featured hikes I had done in Washington. Several years ago, they had an issue where their readers submitted their favorite hikes in their state. Even Rhode Island residents weighed in. When the list got to Washington, it began with stating what an embarrassment of riches Washington had. Some favorites were around Mount Rainier, others around Glacier Peak (mine are), other preferred the Olympic Mountains, while others preferred the North Cascades or Pasayten Wilderness or Alpine Lakes Wilderness or Indian Heaven, and so on. No other state had such a proliferation of areas for favorite hikes. I’ll be the first to admit to the vastness of awesome territory in Alaska, but in the lower 48 states, nothing comes close to Washington, and is a big reason why I live here.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 02:11
Hi:

I will be banging away on the essay, playing editor, adding odds and ends, and that final chapter, as I stated, will get plenty of editorial work done on it. While hiking, I remembered to add to the failed paths to FE, and just wrote this:

1. Not patenting an FE invention and keeping it proprietary:

a. Keeping technology secret is the same game that the GCs play; Western “medicine” went through a proprietary medicine craze, where snake oil and other secret ingredient “medicines” were sold, and there are unscrupulous people in the FE field who sell the snake oil equivalent of FE;
b. Genuine FE inventors that really have something are often tarred with the same brush as the charlatans when they play the proprietary technology game;
c. The only people in the dark when FE inventors play the proprietary technology game is the public; whatever the FE inventor built, the GCs developed to a commercial level at least fifty years ago, and they have the 35th generation of the technology of what the FE inventor built in his garage; such inventors are either oblivious to that reality, or they think that somehow they will be allowed to succeed, and the rest of those 18-year-old fantasies; people such as Sparky Sweet took their “secret sauce” proprietary information to their graves with them, unwittingly making the GCs’ job pretty easy, as they self-suppressed their technology;
d. Identically with those applying for patents, those playing the proprietary technology game have announced their self-interest, and are easily suppressed by the GC’s bag of tricks;

Attached are pics referred to in the previous post, one is a picture that that friend took of that yearling bear in a meadow. The other is a picture of that meadow that I took from a fire lookout the next month. The last is a picture of the Olympic Mountains, with Lake Washington in the foreground, taken one fine spring morning in my neighborhood. No complaints. :)

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 02:26
Hi:

I am probably going to include an anecdote from my days of trying to interest “progressives” in FE, from the late 1990s until 2002. Like Brian experienced, all we received was a permanent hairdo from the wind of all the doors slammed in our faces. But some reactions stand out, where I clearly recall them today, and one was by a progressive “organic” environmental kind of guy, who evidenced some political savvy. His response was almost literally, “Wake me up when you can deliver an FE device to my home.” It pretty much summed up Joe Average’s perspective, too. But the response was memorable for two reasons germane to my essay.

1. He won’t wake up until FE is delivered to his home.

2. He will wake up, however.

The masses will not awaken with talk, but only when they can have FE delivered to their homes. That is just how it is. That they are asleep is not a fun realization, but that there is something that can wake them up is the fun part. We can turn the corner as a species, and the Fifth Epochal Event can manifest, but it will only do so when the technology arrives on the scene. Godzilla knows this well, too, which is why when FE inventors begin demonstrating their wares publicly, or like Dennis, bring disruptive energy technology to market, the gentle, subtle tactics are abandoned and the “threat” is attacked and defeated with the top-shelf resources, which include violence.

Best,

Wade

Dennis Leahy
3rd May 2014, 03:01
Wade,

Congratulations on this achievement. Unbelievable what you just synthesized in a few months - and a few decades of experience. A monumental work.

I meant to mention a few posts ago, for the chapter/section "Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy" that you might want to toss in a mention of FE enabling not only the end of the fossil fuel damage, but it's reversal, to a natural equilibrium. (Such as de-acidifying/alkalinizing the oceans, and somehow sequestering CO2 and CH3 aloft. I certainly don't have answers for how it would be practically done, but I am quite convinced (you have quite convinced me) that the solution will come down to requiring massive amounts of energy, and that it will be available. Not that you're going to convince the climatologists that say we have already surpassed the feedback loops' ability to self-correct, even if fossil fuels stopped immediately, worldwide. Like delivering FE to Average Joe's doorstep, it will require climatologists actually seeing the remediation and reversal work before they'll believe it. But I just thought that this aspect of what FE can do is not just critically important, it may be critically important for factions or individuals within the "Godzilla" structure to see a pathway out of the 6th and greatest mass extinction, in order to lean that direction.

Dennis

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 04:54
Hey, Mr. O:

I did mention that. Specifically:

“The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could also be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere.”

Is there some way that I should have made that clearer? Today, any gas can be removed from the atmosphere, if you have enough energy to do it, as you mention. With enough energy, those kinds of problems are really pretty trivial, from a chemist’s perspective. Many industrial processes and chemicals are used the way that they are because of energy scarcity. I really did not go there in much detail in that chapter, and maybe I will.

One thing that studying the material in that essay made clear is that “natural” is a curious idea that has many different meanings. The atmosphere was “naturally” almost all carbon dioxide a few billion years ago. The reign of the dinosaurs benefitted from the high carbon dioxide levels from volcanism which made it a hothouse Earth. Our ice age is “natural,” and all complex life will naturally die within a billion years. But a species like humans can change those “natural” outcomes.

Earth’s ecosystems are slowly being carbon starved. As I noted in that visionary chapter, with FE and antigravity, we can make whatever atmosphere we want. What bringing down carbon dioxide levels down to preindustrial levels will do is restart the ice age that humanity has delayed at this time with its hydrocarbon burning. Earth’s surface is pretty inhospitable during an ice age, and where I am sitting as I write this was under a mile of ice twenty thousand years ago.

As that vision suggests, however, whatever Earth’s climate and ecosystems do will not have much bearing on human wellbeing. A big question that will arise is if humans will change the climate in a conscious way. In that future that Roads visited:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

they could have chosen to manipulate the climate, but chose not to, and I am sure it was an enlightened perspective that respected Earth’s rhythms. Big issues, obviously. So, I favor reversing our damage – all of it that we can. After that, will we partner with nature, provide enlightened influence, and the like? I don’t know, but those are sure questions that I would love to see humanity in a position to answer. :)

Off to bed now.

Thanks,

Wade

Dennis Leahy
3rd May 2014, 12:47
Having read that we have supposedly crossed numerous thresholds - not just atmospheric CO2 - that are now in runaway feedback loops, and that even the immediate cessation of all fossil fuel burning on Earth would not allow the Earth atmosphere to self-correct to sustain most life forms... well, the statements made are very powerful, and so it made me think that it might be good to make a more broad statement about addressing the wide scope of systems (such as the methane that has been and is being released from the Arctic, and the acidification of the oceans) rather than just CO2. There are so many (innumerable) ways that passively, FE will change humanity and the Earth, and this seems like one where we would have to actively deploy FE-powered technology to remediate and stabilize the climate cycle.

The statement you made is clear, I was just pointing out that it may be worth specifically mentioning that FE can address the seemingly unstoppable climatic feedback loops that willl not self-correct by sequestering CO2.

I realize that this incredible work of yours will not be universally accepted, and that maybe the real target audience (the choir members) don't need this specifically pointed out. It happens to be one of the areas that I have let my mind wander when thinking about what will change with the release of FE, pondering what the climatic remediation might actually look like.

Take care, my friend.

Dennis

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 14:01
Hi Dennis:

I am not against getting into more details. I’ll think about it. Yes, a general statement that any “natural” trend that we upset we can put back into balance would be a good one. But it also begins treading into territory that I probably need to address more, and I have had arguments with “mystics” about this. The male model of “medicine” depicts the issue rather well:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#masculine

It is interventionist, violent, and actually a racket today. Engineers can get behind tinkering with Earth’s atmosphere, but not everybody will like it. I see the situation like that contrast between the two future Earths that Roads visited.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672115&viewfull=1#post672115

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

There was genetic engineering in both worlds. One was done in evil, self-serving fashion, while the other was done with love and the consent of the organisms. I see this issue getting great play. I have already had some New Age types be against the idea of asteroid mining because the asteroids would not want to be mined. I doubt it. Even if asteroids had something that we could call a consciousness, they would likely cooperate with becoming part of the civilization of a sentient species. But I also doubt that asteroids have that kind of awareness. Also, those myths of exploded planets are just that, myths. The asteroid belt is only debris from the solar system’s formation, and when they have been able to date asteroids that hit Earth, it confirmed an origin with the solar system.

If we become space-faring, along with cleaning up our space mess, one of the first orders of business would be cleaning up the solar system’s neighborhood, and there is no important function of the asteroid belt, other than clearing the way for mammals by wiping out the dinosaurs, but I don’t think that anybody wants to argue that we need another one of those. :)

I see cleaning up the asteroid belt as similar to building a roof to keep the rain off, although cleaning up the asteroid belt would be more along the lines of prevention. As I stated before, what FE and related technologies would spawn are truly beyond our imaginations, and I think that principles are more important than any specific project. If these issues are approached from a place of love rather than fear, they will be resolved to everybody’s benefit. The FE conundrum is ultimately about the love/fear divide, and the reason why every FE attempt to date has failed is fear. Not only is Godzilla the King of Fear, but the FE aspirants all approach it from fear. If they approached it from love, they would give it away, but the public’s fear has also helped torpedo that approach (no worthy and capable group to give it to). The public has fallen into line with the scarcity-based (fear-based) conditioning:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

and that has helped make them self-centered and egocentric. That universal tunnel-vision arising from an egocentric, fearful perspective, is the real reason why we do not have FE, not the virtues or failings of any FE aspirant or Godzilla’s antics. Oh, Godzilla has plenty to answer for, and he will, just as we all will, as the final judge is always ourselves. But he is “just” an “enabler,” not really much of a creative force. He is more parasite than predator. Again, these are big subjects, and they deserve to be discussed. Thanks for bringing it up.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 16:09
Hi:

The subject that Dennis brought up highlights an issue that I continually deal with. Maintaining a balanced, comprehensive perspective is very hard to do, especially when interacting with the public. Part of the problem is that more than 99% of the population does not even want to understand my message, so they try to drag the conversations in all manner of unproductive direction. My experience with the trolls in all-comers forums was probably my ultimate experience with that phenomenon:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/critics.htm#troll

But probably the most insidious conversation wrecker was seemingly well-intended people who really do not understand my message but think they do, who try to drag the conversation into realms of their naïve or selfish predilections, such as all the inventor-itis posts on this thread, the “bright idea” stuff (usually around raising money, etc.), the conspiracist stuff, and so on. Those comprise those levels 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level6

I am continually stretched between making a point, going a little deeper for those who need it to really understand, and insulting the intelligence of my readers by watering it down to some kind of kindergarten level and endlessly repeating myself. As Dennis noted, I will be essentially making some assumptions about my readers, or at least those that I am trying to recruit into the choir. Any scientist who reads my work will readily see that the same way of bringing down the carbon dioxide content can be used to manipulate the atmosphere’s gases in any way that we want. And those I will be looking for will also realize that solely making Earth and the solar system into an engineer’s ultimate fantasy is also missing the mark. Balancing our ability to manipulate our environment, with an understanding of those we share the environment with, is something that very few can accomplish today, generally because they are operating from fear and not love. It really is about that simple.

One of the primary upshots of my work is that people can almost completely disconnect human welfare from what the Sun and Earth do. We can create our own environments that not only do not impinge on other life forms (and can even make their lives better than “nature” has), but also we can control our environments so that whatever Earth's climate does, for instance, will not impact humanity. It is one of the many mind-benders that those in the choir will need to wrap their minds around.

While the ideas can become very complex, what is most important is where the heart is. Is it loving, or is it fearful? That has always been the crux of the matter, as far as I have seen, which is why I say that FE and love are joined at the hip, in both practical and mystical ways.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd May 2014, 17:48
Hi:

Between chores in the coming weeks, which include essay editing, I will likely make some brief posts on various issues. One is the idea of “nature.” What readers of my essay should realize is that “nature” on Earth is the interaction of celestial, geophysical, and life processes. While the seeming Gaian “nature” of regulating Earth’s geophysical environment has some merit, so does Medean “nature,” where “nature” wipes the slate clean with mass extinctions, and life starts over. After the Permian Extinction, marine ecosystem diversity did not recover for 100 million years. So, “nature” can be a bitch.

Male chimps and gorillas murdering infants they did not father, and the females then mating with the murderers with their offspring, is “natural,” but I doubt that any humans today would want to emulate such “natural” practices.

The subject of human “nature” has been argued since the ancients, and many human traits called “human nature,” such as slavery and the subjugation of women, are now known to only be artifacts of a certain level of economic development. And what may be “human nature,” such as the oppression of women, philandering men, and violence, is not something that anybody should cheer because it is “natural.” Humanity is the supposedly sentient species, and we can overcome our “natures” or change them.

All the time, I see stuff like organic farmers calling their methods “natural.” There is nothing natural about a farm. It is an artificial environment, refashioning nature for human benefit. Some have decried the idea of indoor farms as “unnatural,” but farms are not natural to begin with, nor are ranches. A primary method of maintaining those environments is keeping nature out, such as “weeding,” “pest” control, and wiping out the predators who might feast on the herds of domestic animals.

Genetic engineering is not “natural,” but is it a bad thing? As Roads’s visits alluded to:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672115&viewfull=1#post672115

genetic engineering could be beneficial to plants and animals, or detrimental, depending on human intentions. These brains we have, combined with our prehensile hands, is something new on Earth, and as Michael and others have stated:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#age3

that often comes with the territory of being an ensouled species, and potentially wrecking a planet, usually taking themselves with it, is the great challenge that ensouled species with such manipulative abilities face. So, what is “natural,” and is it something we want? Big questions.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Melinda
4th May 2014, 02:47
I second Dennis’ congratulations on finishing the essay draft Wade. Landmark moment.


Post 3572: “I am continually stretched between making a point, going a little deeper for those who need it to really understand, and insulting the intelligence of my readers by watering it down to some kind of kindergarten level and endlessly repeating myself.”

I can see the problem there. For what it’s worth, the responses you developed to Dennis’ points (in posts 3569, 3571-3) were enjoyable to read again. All those points have been made before. I look forward to reading them yet again in your completed essay, in their respective place, however brief. I find that when a core philosophy and overview is written succinctly, it can be enjoyable to return to, to focus the mind, away from external distractions. I can always bookmark these last posts. Then I can return to them here if I personally, and subjectively, wish to refocus. I’m not asking you to continually engage those aspects.


Post 3572: “One of the primary upshots of my work is that people can almost completely disconnect human welfare from what the Sun and Earth do. We can create our own environments that not only do not impinge on other life forms (and can even make their lives better than “nature” has), but also we can control our environments so that whatever Earth's climate does, for instance, will not impact humanity. It is one of the many mind-benders that those in the choir will need to wrap their minds around.”

Sometimes I think about the breadth of this concept. How physically leaving earth behind as a race may be akin to leaving a parental home behind, for the first time, to face the world as an independent adult. Before it’s done, there is no direct, experience-based, frame of reference for it. Some people can’t wait to get away from their family home (with good reason), others may never have been given the tools to do it confidently, some are so comfortable with the established dynamic that it never appeals to move on. But a world of abundance, that can be enjoyed by our race on earth universally, can lift us into a place where off-world notions that are (perhaps) currently daunting can instead become both an appreciated responsibility and an adventure. Ones we view as both natural and nourishing.

World wide abundance makes contemplating these ideas a pleasure, not a chore, and no longer a fantasy reserved for the privileged living beyond average survival concerns. With the root causes of our competition for survival cured, and with the use of FE technology to heal the environmental damage we’ve done, we will be able to doubt ourselves less. We will have good reason to have new faith in our abilities – to be new things, and live in new ways or places.

On the Natural Environment :

-- People often turn to a natural (non-human) environment to escape the negative vibrations of others. Others whose demeanours are shaped by a scarcity-riddled mind set. Rich or poor, we can still be shaped that way within. So we turn to nature to feel free to be ourselves, without demands on us, and even to offer love / appreciation without fear of rejection.
-- We turn to nature to heal from technology that functions using unhealthy frequencies or pollutes the atmosphere.
-- We turn to nature to experience lifeforms of different shapes and ecosystems that multiply that variation in one place - because psychically the variation is nourishing, even before it engages our intellect.

A world of abundance, and non-competitive kindness, can mean nature is no longer ‘an escape.’ We can relate to the ‘natural world’ without fear of being its victim (droughts, storms etc), and without any urgent need to protect it from our own species. After healing the damage we’ve done, we can relate to our planet without guilt. Once we have healed, and experienced the ability to live off world, we can love earth freely, respecting her sovereignty and our own, rather than clinging to her because we’ve nowhere else to go. Heaven knows what wealth of variation exists in life forms around the universe, waiting to be engaged and to enrich our lives. The world of variation in each other, that we will be freed to experience, will be a new realm in itself.

Many of us are in love with earth, and with good reason. But it is more than possible, with abundant energy resources, that we could create ecosystems beyond earth, that the earth herself might fall in love with from afar. We can nourish them with our spirit. Grow them with good intent, and a loving sense of purpose. We have known beauty, rich in complexity, living here. We are capable of creating it, and creating it brand new – in ways that would surprise us.

I can see why there’s a conflict for a lot of people (even though they may not be ideal choir members while that conflict is unresolved in them.) We live with so much contradiction. Technology has advanced us in so many ways, and yet expedited so much damage in others. When this bothers me, I still can’t help but see the damaging phase as just that – a painful, fumbling, growing phase. And what will lift us out of that is the will to do it, by using the technology that can take us forwards rather than backwards.

Some ‘level 19s’ may be on the verge of mastering physicality in order to transcend it. But for many of us, there is work to be done. I can see plenty to be mended, enjoyed and newly created before my own fascination with it is through.

A culture built on slavery is one conducive to its slaves relinquishing imagination, because ‘others’ are taking responsibility for the big decisions. I don’t want to wait for someone else to imagine life for us. I think it’s within all of us to imagine how to apply FE technology peacefully and harmoniously, ourselves. A culture where technology assists our consciousness, instead of dulling it. Truly - I wouldn’t mind talking to some benevolent ETs about that one.

Again, as always, it comes down to choosing – objectively and with decency – the world as we wish it to be. One abundant, peaceful, and thriving with creation.

Maybe I could have said all this with less. Sometimes I’m unsure how to edit. I just feel drawn to thinking about all of this, and writing helps that journey.

Wade Frazier
4th May 2014, 14:34
Hi:

For those interested, I edited my first and last chapters:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=829430&viewfull=1#post829430

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=829712&viewfull=1#post829712

and those are the only updates to those chapters than I plan to publish until the essay is published sometime in the summer.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

P.S. Hi Melinda:

Good stuff. I may write a reply to your post if I can find the time.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th May 2014, 21:12
Hi Melinda:

On your post, on humanity “leaving home” and becoming space-faring, that is a nice analogy. I might borrow it someday. :)

Yes, the view of “nature” will radically change if we have FE and abundance. I doubt that any of us can really fathom it, but that glimpse that Roads saw:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

gives us some hints.

Yes, the contradictions in technology use have conflicted people. As my essay will make clear, our tools made us. Going forward is the only way I see out of this mess.

On slavery, yes, keeping them ignorant was important, which is why attaining literacy was a capital crime in some slave cultures. The trick that Godzilla is playing is gulling the slaves and prisoners into thinking they are free. I’ll say this for him: he is talented.

Best,

Wade

P.S. I am adding this as a note to my essay, on the perils of holding conferences.

I do not know how long it was the case or if it still is today, but FE conferences in the 1990s were attended by CIA personnel, many of them, who had to identify their employers when asked (they even wore badges, according to regulations, but hid them under their lapels and the like), as they fulfilled the letter of the law, if not its spirit. Worldly FE inventors with the goods avoided such conferences, as they were crawling with not only CIA personnel, but those from other agencies, private interests, opportunists, and the other predators (the GCs’ agents definitely attended). Those conferences were seen as not only a waste of time by those inventors, but potentially fatal. The day that I met Dennis, I heard him speak to several hundred people at the Seattle Center, with several news crews recording his talk (only a Canadian TV station broadcast coverage of the event, which is the only time that I ever saw positive TV media coverage of Dennis’s efforts), but the local media did not report on his talk, and smeared him not long after that event with their usual lies. In the audience that night was a heckler, sitting directly in front of me, who was Bill the BPA Hit Man’s lawyer, challenging Dennis about the phony bankruptcy suit that Bill had filed, with that attorney’s help. Bill was responsible for the death of one of Dennis’s employees several months earlier, so it was astounding chutzpah for that attorney to heckle Dennis as he did. After Dennis was released from jail in 1989, and left Ventura County under the judge’s approval to speak at a conference, Bill arrived to heckle him and destroy his efforts there.

In Ventura in 1988, a pair of elderly European brothers told me of attending one of Max Gerson’s conferences when he was poisoned with arsenic, which ended the conference. Brian O’Leary told me that the medical racket secret teams are more ruthless than those in the energy racket, and in my circles I heard more than one tale of sudden deaths of key people at alternative medicine conferences that were likely murder.

When we held FE shows in 1987-1988, we later heard about luminaries in the audiences, and some identified themselves at the shows, such as the head of the Department of Energy for the New England region. At a show in early 1988, Mr. Deputy was in the audience, and he obtained a search warrant for our facilities the next day, to strike the day after that, which began my life’s worst year. When I received a standing ovation at one conference in 1988, the man leading the ovation led the effort to steal our company a few months later. In 1992, soon before Dennis was kangarooed into prison, where prison officials repeatedly set him up to be murdered, Dennis flew me to a conference around his national ad campaign for FE. During my flight home, I was improbably sitting behind a conference speaker, and his assistant sitting next to him crafted a plan to steal Dennis’s company during that flight, which he inadvertently showed me soon before I disembarked, in one of my life’s more bizarre synchronicities.

When Dennis held his Philadelphia show in 1996, with 5,000 people in attendance, we discovered that federal officials were in the audience to arrest Dennis (who was still on parole at the time) and Yull Brown (who spent 12 years in Soviet gulags and Turkish prisons), if they staged a transmutation experiment with radioactive materials at that show, after the federal government initially approved the demonstration and then withdrew it soon before the show. Yull was prepared for the demonstration, but Dennis decided to not have them risk more prison time. Mr. Skeptic was also in the audience, and the next day began his “skeptical” career. We were also subjected to a highly sophisticated sting operation immediately after that show.

The week that we began planning our 2004 New Energy Movement conference, and a few days after Eugene Mallove agreed to be our first speaker, he was murdered. Brian then became the conference’s keynote speaker, and immediately after the conference he understandably moved to South America, where he lived for the rest of his life. Those are just some events that I saw and heard of regarding staging conferences on such subject matter, and there other kinds of problems besides those.

Wade Frazier
5th May 2014, 15:06
Hi:

I updated the “visions” chapter, and do not plan to update it again until I publish the essay:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827810&viewfull=1#post827810

I want to make this very clear, partly because I see readers still struggling with the idea. What I am not going to do, and what the choir is not going to do, is proselytize. Those in the choir are not going to be telling their friends, families, and colleagues about FE and abundance, except maybe in passing. At most, they will direct interested people toward my essay, but that will be about it. The ball with then be in that person’s court to do the work and wake up to its message. I have no interest in the 99+% of the population who will attack it, dismiss it, who need to be cajoled and bribed into understanding it, and the like. Those people will only begin to awaken when FE is delivered into their lives. Those who feel the need to proselytize are not going to be candidates for the choir. They have to get over it, maybe by proselytizing and seeing its utter futility, and they will be risking their relationships with those they proselytize to. I have seen the careers of FE proselytizers end.

This is something different, and the mass movement, Level 10 mentality:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

is not amenable to what I am doing. I have been involved in the greatest Level 10 efforts ever mounted, and they have not come close to working. I am looking for the needles in haystacks who are going to realize that what I am doing is different, and who will do the work to gain comprehensive perspectives on these epochally important issues. I am not looking to engage people who just have no idea what I am writing about, who need it dumbed down to the kindergarten level before they begin to understand, who want to fight me, engage in the innumerable irrational, naïve, and dishonest critiques that I spent many years fielding, to the point where I eventually realized that those people had no interest in waking up, but were only interested in attacking or dismissing anything that threatened their egocentric delusions. The vast majority of humanity falls into that category today (Levels 1, 2, 3, and 5 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level1 ), and I have no interest in engaging them. They will begin to “wake up” when FE is delivered into their lives. Level 4s can also just wait until they get their wish and FE is delivered to them, and Level 8s can be pleasantly surprised one day when FE is delivered into them.

I also will have no interest in engaging people stuck in levels 6, 7, 9, and 11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level6

as they are a danger to themselves and those around them. Maybe my work will help some of them awaken to the futility of their approaches, but the ball will be in their court to do the work. When it comes down to it, the only people I really have much interest in engaging are Level 0s, who never heard of FE before, and some Level 10s, who have not quite given up their ideas of some kind of stampede toward FE. I will also not spend much time with Level 10s. If they truly digest my essay and still have their Level 10 ideas, trying to see how Level 10 can still work, then they are not in my target audience.

In summary, I am generally looking for Level 0s who have also had some kind of awakening experience so that the radicalized perspective in my essay will at least make enough sense to them so that they get out of their easy chairs, do their homework, and come to realize that I may know something about the subjects that I write about. And the ball will be in their court to do some public singing, and I will hear it (I will publish how they can get my attention). I know that they will be less than one-in-a-thousand in the general population, but that is whom I seek. They can be as rare as one-in-a-million and my approach may still have a chance of success. I am looking for those who can hit the notes, not round up a herd of people who half-understand, at best. I can see people doing that, and they can go do it, but they are playing at the kindergarten level, and there needs to be at least one high-school level out there, which could become a college curriculum.

Again, this is something different, and nobody has come remotely close to trying it that I have seen. I see no point in trying all the paths to disaster that I have either survived or witnessed countless times, as people had their lives wrecked and prematurely ended. I will do my best to be patient, and will particularly resist all the people who will advocate tactics from a place of desperation, from a place of “how do we make money doing this?” and the many other catastrophic approaches that I have no longer have any interest in (I plan to be in an environment where I do not even hear from them). It took me forty years to get here, and I may have another forty years ahead of me, and I may receive some pleasant surprises on where this can lead and how easy it was to manifest FE ( :) ), but I am not going to backtrack, dumb it down, etc. It is time for a different approach, and one that aims high.


Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
5th May 2014, 16:04
Hi:

I am roaring along, and right now am adding little tidbits to the essay, to present ideas that I needed to work in somehow. I just tweaked a paragraph to add Fuller’s idea of the uselessness of political systems competition, to wit:


“Similarly, I call public officials, particularly elected ones, “retail politicians,” as they are the face the public sees, but have little real power, particularly the kind that impacts important issues. R. Buckminster Fuller called political actors “stooges” of economic interests, and from what I have seen, he is right. Fuller also noted that political systems competition was not a solution to humanity’s current predicament. The “competition” between socialism (or communism) and capitalism is ineffectual and distracts from important issues. Not only are today’s political-economic system debates useless for solving humanity’s fundamental problems, but a world based on free energy technology and economic abundance renders today’s debates meaningless, making them akin to arguing which microlith was superior before metals were smelted, or discussing the most benign form of slavery in 1700. Such debates may have had some validity during one epoch, but became pointless in the next.”

I will likely end the “tidbit” part of the editorial process this week, and then take on the long overdue task of wearing my editor’s hat on an essay-level review. I really have not been able to do that yet, being in the throes of study and writing. While getting the initial information written is the most important part of any writing exercise, editing is vitally important, and quite a few reviewers and editors are going to pound on the essay, but I also need to get it in as good a shape as possible before I send it off to them. While they review and edit, so will I, but I may spend more of the coming months of my “spare” time editing some of my site’s other essays. Some have not been touched in more than a decade, and need some attention, to where I get all of my material in a roughly even footing, and make it a more coherent whole. It is hard work, but fulfilling.

Back to work,

Wade

Limor Wolf
5th May 2014, 18:43
By reading this thread in a linear fashion, I seemed to have missed a few things :)


Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "I finished it!"

Mazal-Tov, Wade for this incredible achievment. To echo Dennis's and Melinda's words - this seems to be a monumental work and a landmark moment, it must have resembled a child labour for you. Your work seems to be original in quest and purpose and in examining the role of energy from as many perspectives as possible (Historically, scientifically psychologically, anthropologically to name but a few), it allows us readers to gain insight and deeper understanding as to how energy functions on this planet, what it is, how it all came to be, the tremendous prices we pay for misusing and manipulating our human needs without any care or thought, and most importantly what it can become from now on with the new and potentially wonderful discoveries of producing energy in a way that is non-expendable and ecosystem friendly. A revelation that would change the face of the earth in a quntum leap type of way for the betterment, as long as it is responsibly implementd. It is a truly rich and versatile world that we live in, if we only let it, if we will only dare to grasp this .. Let the word be spread and known and consciousness reach far and wide.

Energy is not a resource as the average citizen may seem to think, it is the essence from which every aspect of our existance is weaved from and it now lays itself infront of human beings for the purpose of acknowledgement and acquaintanceship, maybe your essey will hurry the arrival of free energy, which perheps is the real messiah who comes to redeem this planet with no megalomaniac or side effects. :)



Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "my photographer’s mind thought, “What would Limor like to see?” Attached are some pics from today with that in mind. "
Beautiful photos, Wade. Thank you, It really expends the heart, good photography as well. There are not many places in my little claustrophobic and dense country where mother earth was left without interference, and water is considered quite a luxury in the middle east, so seeing the lakes and the snowy mountain caps that you have there is truly refreshing. I also enjoy landscape photography, but must settle for more modest views (http://en.photolight.co.il/gallery/25673.html). In recent weeks, I found an open field area, 50 minutes walk from my home (photos attached below). I take a walk there whenever I can to breath a little 'fresh air' and listen to the birds and insects before the great heat beginns. That sums up to 7 mile or so walk. Nature is such a soul uplifter, a 'Gas station' (ah, sorry for the choice of words), a recharger and life nourishment provider that if it eventually decides to say good bye to the generally parasitic human beings living on it's back, a good advocacy and benefit of the doubt can be given to it, but chances are we will do this to ourselves first, problem is, we are taking with us whatever we can, up to the last crumb. It is as good time as ever to change our mindset and start anew. Free energy may greatly assist us with that.

Love, blessings and safety always ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
5th May 2014, 19:18
Hi:


Here is another added tidbit:


“There is also a three-ring circus of disinformation around the UFO/ET issue, purveyed by numerous parties for various agendas, including the world’s national security states, especially the USA’s. In the milieu are also hyperventilating conspiracists, stalwart establishment defenders, serious investigators, an easily misled public, and other parties to the mayhem. Consequently, many do not take the situation seriously, which is understandable. A similar situation surrounds the FE milieu. There seems to be a method to the seeming madness, however, and the GCs have helped orchestrate the confusion, to their benefit.”

Back to work,

Wade

P.S. I saw Limor's post as I posted this, and will respond soon.

Wade Frazier
5th May 2014, 19:29
Hi Limor:


Thanks for that. It is nice that you can get out into nature a little. I think that my days in LA permanently prevented me from ever taking for granted what I have today, and living in a rainforest is an extraordinary experience in today’s world, particularly the industrialized world.

To that site you linked to, there are lupins near you? Not bad.

Time will tell if what I am doing makes a dent, but I have to admit that keeping people from harm who get involved with this is probably as important to me as making a dent.

Love and peace,

Wade

Wade Frazier
5th May 2014, 21:45
Hi:


I added that “nature” question in this revised chapter:


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=828175&viewfull=1#post828175


for another tidbit added.


Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
7th May 2014, 00:09
Hi:

Oh boy, do I need a break. The essay is not just text, but I have several tables, and even some graphics. On my list of things to do was finish the timeline tables. I have several, and the human timeline tables were my last tasks. Today, I made the human event table, just up until Columbus. Each entry has when it happened and links to the part of the essay where the subject is discussed. It is the same style that I have already done on my site:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/timeline.htm

It should help the reader navigate the information, and there is a bewildering amount of it. I don’t expect any potential choir member to come up for air for months.

Below are the events I created in that timeline today, with the date below it. It is easy to read in the tables, like that timeline linked to above. The table also stated where it happened. I am sure that I will be adding more events, when I get back at it, but I am taking a break now. :)

Best,

Wade

Event Date
First stone tool made
c. 2.6-2.5 mya
First control of fire
c. 2.0-1.5 mya
Appearance of Homo erectus
c. 2.0-1.8 mya
First migration from Africa
c. 2.0-1.9 mya
First Mode 2 (Aurignacian) stone tools made
c. 1.7 mya
Appearance of Homo heidelbergensis
c. 1.3 mya-600 kya
Appearance of stone-tipped weapons
c. 500 mya
Neanderthal descent from Homo heidelbergensis
c. 500 mya
Appearance of thrown weapons
c. 400 kya
Neanderthal invention of Mode 3 (Mousterian) tools
c. 300 kya
Appearance of Homo sapiens
c. 200 kya
First heat-treated stone tools
c. 170 kya
First bedding, and complex tool-making processes. c. 75 kya
First needle, and perhaps the first arrowheads c. 60 kya
Behaviorally modern humans appear and a group of about 300 leave Africa and colonize the rest of Earth c. 60-50 kya
Humans reach Australia
c. 48-46 kya
Human begin invading Europe
c. 45-40 kya
First cave paintings made
c. 40 kya
First fisherman appears
c. 40 kya
Dog domesticated
c. 33-15 kya
Mode 4 (Châtelperronian) stone tools invented
c. 30 kya
Humans begin hunting mammoths
c. 29 kya
Neanderthals go extinct
c. 30-27 kya
First known inter-human violent conflict
c. 25 kya
Pottery invented
c. 20 kya
Mode 5 (microlith) tools invented
c. 17 kya
Humans reach the Americas
c. 15-11 kya
Pig domesticated
c. 15 kya
Nuts first made into human staple
c. 13.5 kya
First sedentary village established
c. 13.5 kya
First known mass slaughter of humans
c. 13 kya
Hook-and-line fishing invented
c. 12 kya
Slavery “invented”
c. 11 kya
Blond hair appears
c. 11 kya
Blue eyes appear
c. 10-6 kya
Cattle domesticated
c. 10.5 kya
Goat domesticated
c. 10 kya
Agriculture begins in Americas
c. 10-8 kya
First city-sized settlement
c. 9.5 kya
Agriculture begins in China
c. 9-8 kya
First city established
c. 5400 BCE
First metal smelted: copper
c. 5000 BCE
Sailboat invented
c. 5000 BCE
Writing invented
c. 5000 BCE
Mass warfare begins
c. 4000 BCE
White skin appears
c. 4000 BCE
Wheel invented
c. 3500 BCE
Bronze invented
c. 3300 BCE
Harappan civilization appears
c. 3300 BCE
Egyptian civilization appears
c. 3100 BCE
Rice paddy system invented
c. 3000 BCE
First literate civilization
c. 3000 BCE
Construction of necropolis at Giza
c. 2570-to-2470 BCE
Egypt’s Old Kingdom ends
c. 2200 BCE
First civilization becomes depopulated
c. 2000 BCE
Bronze Age civilizations rise and collapse
c. 2700-to-1150 BCE
Harappan civilization collapses
c. 1800-to-1700 BCE

Egyptian civilization at its height
c. 1350
First iron age begins
c. 1300 BCE
Trojan War fought
c. 1200 BCE
Peak influence of Phoenician civilization
c. 1200 BCE to 800 BCE
Bantu Expansion Begins
c. 1000 BCE
Rome founded
c. 750 BCE
Assyria destroys Kingdom of Israel
c. 722 BCE
Greece begins to recover from collapse of Mycenaean civilization
c. 700 BCE
Guatama Buddha born
c. 560-480 BCE
Athens enters its classic phase
508 BCE
First Mesoamerican state appears
c. 500 BCE
Victory in 50-year-war with Persia marks height of classic Greek civilization 449 BCE
War with Sparta, and devasting epidemic, marks decline of Athens
431-to-404 BCE
Alexender the Great Conquers numerous civilizations with a military prowess unsurpassed until industrialized warfare 336- to-323 BCE
Watermill invented, probably by Greek engineers c. 300-250 BCE
Rome begins first war with Carthage
264 BCE
Paper invented
c. 200 BCE
Rome destroys Carthage and Corinth, enslaving the survivors
146 BCE
Roman civil wars begin that end the republic c. 133 BCE
Defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra mark end of Roman republic and beginning of Roman empire 31 BCE
Jesus born
c. 7-4 BCE
Windmill and steam engine invented
c. 50 CE (all subsequent dates in this table are CE)
Antonine plague ravages Roman Empire, kills two emperors, and marks end of Peace of Rome 165-180
Plague of Cyprian scourges Rome
250-270
Christianity become’s Rome’s state religion 325-to-380

Roman imperial capital moved to Constantinople 330
Horse collar invented
4th century
Rome falls to Germanic tribes
476
Plague of Justinian kills up to half of Europe 541-542
Muhammad born
c. 570
Arabs begin enslaving Africans
c. 650
Islamic Moors invade Iberian Peninsula
711
Mayan civilization collapses
c. 750-to-950
Viking expansion
c. 787-to-early 1000s
Medieval Warm Period begins
c. 800
European watermills begin great proliferation
c. 1000
Chinese horse collar used in Europe
c. 1000
England conquered from France; peasantry begin dispossession 1066
Christian conquest of Toledo results in Greek teachings being reintroduced into Europe 1085
First Crusade
1096
Fourth Crusade sacks “ally” Constantinople 1204
Albigensian Crusade
1209
Rise and fall of Mongol empire
1206-to-1368

Medieval Warm Period ends c. 1250
Series of European famines mark beginning of Little Ice Age 1304-1315
England and France begin more than 100 years of warfare
1337
Black Death sweeps Old World
c. 1338-1350
Renaissance begins, rise of humanism in Europe Late 1300s
China mounts naval expeditions in Indian Ocean and in Pacific Ocean near Southeast Asia 1405-to-1433
Portugal begins sailing the Atlantic Ocean
1420
Portugal initiates new era of slavery with captured Africans
1434
Ottoman conquest of Constantinople
1453
Portuguese naval expedition crosses the southern tip of Africa. 1488
Columbus stumbles into Western Hemisphere, and European conquest of humanity begins. 1492

Wade Frazier
7th May 2014, 14:11
Hi:

A tidbit I added this morning, at the end of this paragraph:


"Today, average Americans use about eighty times the energy that is provided by their diets, which has been called having eighty energy slaves, but that understates the reality. A barrel of oil provides about one year of the calories needed to fuel a human body, but if that oil was used to power machines, it would perform more than ten man-years of work, often doing work that humans often could not perform in any case, such as propelling an automobile at 100 KPH. Americans really have several hundred energy slaves working for them, which is why the average American lives a richer lifestyle than Earth’s richest human of two centuries ago. In 2013, the energy in the oil wrested from Earth’s crust contained enough energy to power several hundred billion energy slaves, and add in the other energy resources, and today’s industrialized humanity rides on the backs of more than one trillion energy slaves."

My calculation is 85 million barrels per day, with each barrel providing ten man-years of work, and oil provides about a third of global energy consumption. That equals about 1.2 trillion energy slaves.

Mind-boggling numbers….


Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
7th May 2014, 17:26
Hi:

Going hiking soon, but just tweaked a section, produced below:


“The energy from controlled fire allowed humans to leave the trees, grow their brains, and socially organize in new ways, as humans commandeered energy that otherwise fed ecosystem processes and used it for immediate human benefit. It was also the first great human robbery. All heterotrophs “rob” energy from other life forms to live, with the primary exception being the symbiosis that flowering plants entered into with animals. But no animal had ever robbed energy from ecosystems on that scale before. By making fires, humans were liberating many times the energy that their biological processes used, energy that could have fed forest ecosystems. But while humans were only using deadwood, it was the least destructive to forest ecosystems. When humans began burning forests to flush out animals to kill and make biomes suitable for animals to hunt, they were destroying and altering ecosystems on a vast scale. A cord of wood provides about four years of the calories that fuel a human adult’s body, and one hectare can provide a sustainable harvest of about ten years of human calories. A family of four using a hectare for firewood on a sustainable basis would be using more than twice their caloric intake for burning wood. Very little of that released energy would benefit humans, if they burned it over a campfire, as humans did for the entire epoch of the hunter-gatherer; that liberated energy largely went straight into the sky. The direct benefit to humans would be the energy that went into cooking food, what warmed human flesh, what was used to make tools, and the benefits of scaring off predators and providing light at night. More indirect benefits would have been ecosystem changes to provide human-digestible calories, such as American Indians burning the woodlands and plains to make environments conducive to animals they could easily hunt. In this essay’s table, the earliest epochs are the most uncertain, but saying that hunter-gatherer humans used 2.5 times their dietary calories in their economy is likely understating the case, perhaps greatly. That 5% efficiency number is also a rough estimate, and both numbers could be refined by a scientifically performed effort. The numbers in that table for subsequent epochs are more accurate, with the most accurate of all being for industrial-technological societies, and I live in one. The increases in efficiency become more modest with each epoch, as the limits of entropy are approached.”


Those kinds of tweaks will be made over the next couple of weeks, as I also wear my editor’s hat. It sure is fun to get close to the end of at least producing a first draft.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
7th May 2014, 18:27
Hi:

Here is an expanded tidbit of what I published on Monday:


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=830838&viewfull=1#post830838


“There is also a three-ring circus of disinformation around the UFO/ET issue, purveyed by numerous parties for various agendas, including the world’s national security states, especially the USA’s. I take most “insider” revelations with a grain of salt unless they are well-documented, as the “inside” generates a great deal of disinformation, attention-seekers pretend to be insiders, and other distractions. In the milieu are also hyperventilating conspiracists and stalwart establishment defenders, many of whom are naïve, dishonest, or both. Serious and often professional investigators are in the mix, as well as an easily misled public, among other parties to the mayhem. Consequently, many do not take the situation seriously, which is understandable. A similar situation surrounds the FE milieu. There seems to be a method to the seeming madness, however, and the GCs have helped orchestrate the confusion, to their benefit. There are a few ways to try avoiding those minefields. One is to obtain direct personal experience with UFOs/ETs, another is to be close to key players in the field, and another is to spend a great deal of time digesting and testing the evidence. I have taken all three of those approaches, and all of the chaos aside, my perception in 2014 is that the reason for the UFO/ET cover-up has little or nothing to do with fear of a War of the Worlds reaction (which Eisenhower might have rightly feared in the 1950s, but most Americans today believe that we are not alone in the universe or are open to the idea), but to suppress exotic technologies that would end ultra-elite rule on Earth. Their rule would end for two reasons, the first of which is that free energy and antigravity technologies would radically transform human civilization in ways that TV shows such as Star Trek partially depict, where humanity lived in true economic abundance for the first time. People living in scarcity are easily manipulated, but people living in abundance would not be. The second reason is that few humans would have much obedience to obviously corrupt Earth-based institutions, particularly draconian and violent ones, when it became accepted that humans are simply one of many sentient species in our galaxy and that we are not particularly advanced at all; we are more like cavemen than distinguished members of galactic society.”

This is a glimpse of my process.

Off to hiking.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
7th May 2014, 21:35
Hi Wade,

Very interesting tidbits, sounds like a fair parallelism. The conclusion you made of supressed technology being the main reason for holding back the acknowledgment of 'other life in the universe' is actually backed up by the many who are 'in direct personal experience' with UFO's/ET's and privy to those hidden technologies (free energy, antigravity and time travel) , then all steps are taken to keep that latent and under secrecy. I remember you once wrote that these two subjects of UFO's and Free Energy are linked by the leg. Apparently the ones who are holding the technological knowledge are masters of the key (but not quite, not if the complete package does not include the strongest component -the energetic vibration of love). The significance of these technologies means freedom in every aspect of the word. 'Smoke and mirrors' is as good implementation for helping everyone running towards the wrong doors and as effective as 'divide and rule' is, therefore the suggestions you made for avoiding the minefield sounds very reasonable (although not always seems attainable:))

The third one is possibly the most applicable - "digesing and testing the evidence". If that means to really make an effort and understand what was so far and get the most accurate diagnosis of what is right now, then maybe the next step is directing ourselves to where it will be in the future. By that, minefields will disappear and strawbery fields will supersede them, as the song claims, forever.


P.S

above equations on posts #3584 # 3585 are pretty startling


All the best,

Limor

Wade Frazier
7th May 2014, 22:27
Hi:

I’ll respond to Limor’s post today, with another tidbit that I was composing as I was hiking (which will not be revelatory to readers of this thread). All I’ll say in reply at the moment is that FE means quadrillions, or even quintillions, of energy slaves “exploited” by humanity, instead of the “mere” trillion that we use today.

About that hike… The days of me deciding to take a hike during nice weather will soon come to an end, but I will always appreciate being able to do it. I drove to the mountains, hiked four miles, and returned home all in three hours, and the day is still young. Nearly thirty years ago, I helped maintain the old fire lookout on Granite Mountain:

http://www.wta.org/go-hiking/hikes/granite-mountain-1

and the crowds can be unbearable on a nice summer weekend, but I only encountered two old men, about my age, today on a mid-week afternoon’s jaunt. The forest was as magical as it gets. In the first mile, there was literally about a brook every hundred meters or so crossing the trail, and a couple pictures are attached. The flowers were at the same stage as a few weeks earlier lower, on the mountains that I hike closer to home. It was so gorgeous today that I was half-expecting to see leprechauns frolicking among the flowers.

May is probably my favorite month here, as it is spring at its finest, but the summers here are also incredible. When people from around the world come here in the summer, they look around in slack-jawed awe. When they say they want to come live here, I tell them that they should visit in January, first. :)

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
7th May 2014, 22:45
Absolutely Beautiful! Thank goodness drooling is not yet against the law.
Is that a waterfall in the middle of the open forested area on the left ?

A bleeding heart indeed.. (what a name for a flower) Thanks for the photos, Wade, the energy is felt all the way across the world. A needed CPR
:)

Wade Frazier
8th May 2014, 13:17
Hi:

I got too busy to reply to Limor, but will this morning. But first, here is a tidbit that I just finished. It is going in the “limits of orthodoxy” chapter.

Best,

Wade


Another key set of tensions are those between theorists, empiricists, and inventors. Theorists attempt to account for scientific data, and ideally predict data yet to be adduced, which tests the validity of their hypotheses and theories. Empiricists often adduce that scientific data. Inventors create new technologies. Albert Einstein is the quintessential example of a theorist, never performing experiments relating to his theories, but accounting for experimental results and predicting them. Michelson and Morley, who performed the experiment that produced results which various scientists wrestled with for a generation before Einstein proposed his special theory of relativity, never suspected that their experiment would lead to the theories that it did. The most important experiments in science were generally those that produced unexpected results. Einstein’s general theory of relativity had no experimental evidence when he proposed it (it explained Mercury’s orbit, but that was the only evidence for it when the theory was proposed), but it has been confirmed numerous times since then.

The Wright brothers were typical inventors. Before they flew, theorists said that flying was “impossible,” and mainstream science ignored and ridiculed them for five years after they first flew. The theorists were spectacularly wrong, the empiricists had abandoned their primary principle of observation, and it was up to inventors to finally open their eyes, years after the public witnessed it working. I have encountered numerous technologies that theorists denounce as “impossible,” empiricists ignore as if they did not exist, while the inventors are not exactly sure why their inventions work, but only know that they do. I have explored and been involved with some technologies that defy the theorists, befuddle the empiricists, and often threaten to upend the very foundations of scientific disciplines, which is primarily why they have been ignored as they have, if they are not actively suppressed. At the footnote that ends this sentence, I discuss examples of that phenomenon.



Here is that note:

The inventors of the heat pump that my partner sold cut their published performance data in half so that engineers would not ridicule that “impossible” data. When Gaston Naessens tried patenting his microscope, with its “impossible” optical resolutions, he was unable to explain its resolutions in terms of orthodox optical theory and had to abandon the patent process. Royal Rife earlier invented a microscope that attained similar “impossible” resolutions, but surviving micrographs prove that it indeed attained such resolutions. Brown’s Gas has long been an enigma, with its exact composition unknown. It is made of the hydrogen and oxygen resulting from splitting water, but seems to be unusually bonded. The transmutation experiment with Brown’s Gas has been performed a hundred times or more, including by national governments, and orthodox theory cannot explain the results. While scientists were stumped over just exactly what Brown’s Gas was and how it produced “impossible” results, Yull Brown was not too interested in the theories; he was more interested in what Brown’s Gas could do. Sparky Sweet’s free energy device, which produced a million times the energy that went into it, and also produced antigravity effects, was baffling even to Sparky. He and his partner wrote a book to explain how it worked, but there was still plenty of mystery regarding how it worked. When Sparky demonstrated it to a close colleague, Sparky himself shrugged in amazement, saying that it indeed defied electric theory, but there it was, working. The free energy, antigravity, and other exotic technologies that were demonstrated to my friend blew his mind, and almost any scientist viewing that demonstration would have been stunned into bewilderment.

Wade Frazier
8th May 2014, 16:55
Hi:

The cliché that a picture is worth a thousand words applies to Limor’s question yesterday, and I’ll see how brief I can keep this. :)

In my upcoming essay, I mention many events that built today’s mountain ranges. The Cascade Range is fairly young, with its peaks only several million years old at most, and the prominent volcanoes only a couple million at most. So, the range is very vertical, and it also gets a great amount of precipitation. The so-called Pacific Northwest biome ranges from northern California to Alaska, created by the weather pattern off the north Pacific that brings all that water. Those vertical mountains and high precipitation gave the Cascades its name, alluding to the fact that travelers in the Cascades are often within earshot of running water. The Pacific Northwest might be the world’s capital for waterfalls.

The glaciers of today’s ice age created even more vertical terrain, the U-shaped valleys ground out by the glaciers, as can be seen of this picture of me standing on a mountaintop above Ross Lake:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/beaver.jpg

Where I sit as I write this was under a mile of ice about 15,000 years ago.

I have hiked through that valley in the background twice, and likely will again (you have to charter a boat to get to the trailhead). Glaciers can hang off the side of mountains up here, and I did some pretty stupid activities in my younger days, where I had a little too much fun:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=196769&viewfull=1#post196769

I do not want to be guilty of overselling the Cascade Range, as they can be highly dangerous, which brings me to the picture that Limor asked about. Yes, that is a waterfall in the open, but that open terrain is only a couple of years old, and here is a long yarn about it. I met Dennis in 1986, as a result of preposterous events:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#hooker

I got hooked on the Cascades on my first hike there when I was 15, and my first backpack when I was 17 set the hook deeply, and it never came out:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/pics.htm#matterhorn

That snowy hillside behind that waterfall is near the top of Granite Mountain:

http://www.wta.org/go-hiking/hikes/granite-mountain-1

which has a lookout on top. The summer of 1985, when I tried to find work in Seattle for the third time and failed, my cousin took me to the lookout for a couple of nights. A fisherman’s club that my uncle virtually ran (the uncle who got me hooked on hiking) maintained that lookout. In April 1986, my cousin and I climbed up Granite Mountain and stayed at the lookout to get a view of Halley’s Comet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halley%27s_Comet#Apparitions

which was disappointing; it was only a faint light on the horizon. But climbing to the lookout was spectacular, and was the beginning of the greatest hiking season of my life. Oh, the feats we are capable of in our twenties. I still look back at some of the hiking feats that I performed and can scarcely believe that I did them. What my cousin and I did in a weekend would take a good week today, if I could even do it.

Going to the top of Granite Mountain in early April, especially during a high snowpack winter, meant lots of snow. The snow was several feet deep at the top, with a corniced snow “sculpture,” created by the prevailing winds, over ten feet tall, next to the lookout. We had to climb straight up the mountain, up that slope you can see in the background of that photo, and did not take the main trail. The main trail is dangerous in the spring. 1986 was the third year in a row that somebody died on Granite Mountain hiking in the spring (and an airplane augured into the mountain the next winter). How those people died was taking the main trail, which was under snow, and when they crossed a frozen stream they slipped and careened down the stream’s chute, racing down the mountainside to their deaths.

When I met those old men yesterday, we chatted, and I told them about my younger days maintaining that lookout, and they said that somebody had died on Granite in 2012 and 2013. I do not make it a point to keep track, but it seems like somebody dies on Granite nearly every year, and highlights the main hazard in the Cascades: death by falling. The other main ways of dying are drowning and getting lost and dying of exposure. All three are due to poor judgment, usually because of inexperience. The Cascades are highly deadly mountains, among the deadliest on Earth, but almost all deaths are preventable if people only did not do risky and often stupid activities. The main reason for this is that is an extremely vertical range, where it can snow any day of the year, with most of it in de facto wilderness and near a major metropolitan region, so people hike all over the range who are inexperienced and naïve to the risks (kind of like the FE field :) ), and they die all the time. I do not keep track of the numbers, but my guess is that somebody dies in Washington’s Cascades about once a week. Even in “civilization” it can get dangerous, and the recent mudslide that killed more than 40 people:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Oso_mudslide

is not all that unusual up here, and it could get much worse. I drove past that housing development several times last year, as it was on the main route to North Cascades National Park from Seattle, which I took several people to during my sabbatical.

The volcanoes create mudslides with regularity, called lahars:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahar

About every 500 years, Mount Rainier lets loose with a huge lahar, and it has been about 500 years since the last big one. People have literally built communities on the lahar flows near Mount Rainier, praying that a lahar does not let loose in their lifetimes. One of those would make the recent tragedy look like a picnic. How stupid can people be?

A very small risk is wildlife. The “settlers” quickly drove the local grizzlies to extinction, although a few are hidden away in the North Cascades, and I may have seen the print of one once (up that valley in the picture that I link to above), but the biggest wildlife risk up here is a cougar attack, and I only received a glimpse of a cat once, and saw the tracks of a cougar once.

Bear encounters are more common, and my most dangerous one was on the trail that I hiked on yesterday. About ten years ago, I was hiking with a pal on that trail. We always got an early start for our Sunday morning hikes, so we did not see people on the way up, but we could see hundreds on the way down, for the more popular trails. That morning, we were hiking back, with me in the lead. We were chatting as we hiked, and about 30 yards ahead of me, a black bear cub ran across the trail in front of me and climbed a tree next to the trail. The cub was little bigger than a child’s teddy bear, and for about a tenth of a second my mind thought, “Oh, how cute!” In the next tenth of a second, I thought, “Holy crap! Where is the mother?” I stopped, and just then on the other side of the trail, the mother appeared. I almost walked between a mother and her cub. That is about the only time when black bears attack people, and they almost never do in Washington, with something like only one black bear attack in the last century. But we kind of came close to becoming a statistic. My friend was more experienced with bears than I was, growing up hiking here, and he even cracked a bear in the head with a rock when it came close to his campfire (he hit it right between its glowing eyes). We backed off to about fifty yards away, and I was following my friend’s lead on what to do, as that kind of close encounter was new to me. We stood there, watching the mother, at the base of the tree that her cub had climbed, and she began making a huffing sound at us. I asked my friend what that meant, and he said it was the sound they made before they charged at you. Yikes!

We then backed off around the trail, out of sight, and waited. Our way home was blocked by that scene. We figured that we would likely hear when the mother retrieved her cub and left, so we just stayed out of sight and chatted. Again, this was an insanely popular trail that we had an early start on, but we were expecting to see people, as we already had on our way back. We stood there for twenty minutes or so, and then up the trail from the direction of the bears came a toy dog, the kind of Fifi dogs that you can hold in one hand, with the dog owner some distance behind. Our eyes almost popped out of our heads. The bears had obviously left, as mama bear could have inhaled “Fifi.” The owner saw out wide eyes and asked why, and we told him how lucky his dog was. That is another effect of being so near civilization (a 45 minute drive from my house to get to that trailhead).

Here in the Pacific Northwest, Global Warming is obvious, as glaciers disappear before our eyes:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lyman3.jpg

but the weather systems are also being destabilized. Since I last moved here in 1997, I have seen a few epic drought years, but more epic snowpack years, where the spring thaw has caused floods that wiped out roads and trails like never before, where we get “100-year-floods” every few years (we get the floods during La Niña events, and the droughts during El Niño events, when California gets the precipitation that usually comes our way). And this brings me back to that picture that Limor asked about. When I helped maintain the lookout , we chopped back undergrowth right where that picture is taken from, but the scenery has changed. :)

A couple years ago, during a La Niña event, the snow was deep and there was an avalanche that took out all the trees in one fell swoop, right where that picture is taken. I saw an avalanche once, a couple of miles away, and the ground shook under my feet. The one that took out that swatch where the clear area is happened in February and did not kill anybody, but it nearly reached the highway. Avalanches and landslides that close highways are typical up here. That deadly mudslide has blocked my main way to the North Cascades, and that highway may not open again this year. They will have to reroute the highway.

I see that this post is more than 1800 words, so that picture was worth more than a thousand words, but I have to get back to work.

Best,

Wade

P.S. That waterfall was hidden in the trees before that avalanche, with probably nobody knowing about it. A "benefit" of avalanches. :)

Wade Frazier
8th May 2014, 21:10
For Limor, a couple other falls/streams photos from yesterday.

Today, it rains. :)

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
8th May 2014, 22:34
Hi:

Making those timelines is mind-numbing, but will help my readers develop a big picture awareness. I have to take a break from it and get to other editing, but it is safe to say that I am far from finished adding events to the human timelines. They currently look like the below.

Best,

Wade

Event Date
First stone tool made
c. 2.6-2.5 mya
First control of fire
c. 2.0-1.5 mya
Appearance of Homo erectus
c. 2.0-1.8 mya
First migration from Africa
c. 2.0-1.9 mya
First Mode 2 (Aurignacian) stone tools made
c. 1.7 mya
Appearance of Homo heidelbergensis
c. 1.3 mya-600 kya
Appearance of stone-tipped weapons
c. 500 mya
Neanderthal descent from Homo heidelbergensis
c. 500 mya
Appearance of thrown weapons
c. 400 kya
Neanderthal invention of Mode 3 (Mousterian) tools
c. 300 kya
Appearance of Homo sapiens
c. 200 kya
First heat-treated stone tools
c. 170 kya
First bedding, and complex tool-making processes. c. 75 kya
First needle, and perhaps the first arrowheads c. 60 kya
Behaviorally modern humans appear and a group of about 300 leave Africa and colonize the rest of Earth c. 60-50 kya
Humans reach Australia, and megafauna quickly go extinct
c. 48-46 kya
Humans begin invading Europe
c. 45-40 kya
First cave paintings made
c. 40 kya
First fisherman appears
c. 40 kya
Dog domesticated
c. 33-15 kya
Mode 4 (Châtelperronian) stone tools invented
c. 30 kya
Humans begin hunting mammoths
c. 29 kya
Neanderthals go extinct
c. 30-27 kya
First known inter-human violent conflict
c. 25 kya
Pottery invented
c. 20 kya
Mode 5 (microlith) tools invented
c. 17 kya
Humans reach the Americas, and megafauna quickly go extinct on both continents
c. 15-11 kya
Pig domesticated
c. 15 kya
Nuts first made into human staple
c. 13.5 kya
First sedentary village established
c. 13.5 kya
First known mass slaughter of humans
c. 13 kya
Hook-and-line fishing invented
c. 12 kya
Slavery “invented”
c. 11 kya
Humans reach Mediterranean islands, and megafauna quickly go extinct
c. 11-9 kya
Blond hair appears
c. 11 kya
Blue eyes appear
c. 10-6 kya
Cattle domesticated
c. 10.5 kya
Goat domesticated
c. 10 kya
Agriculture begins in Americas
c. 10-8 kya
First city-sized settlement
c. 9.5 kya
Agriculture begins in China
c. 9-8 kya
First city established
c. 5400 BCE
First metal smelted: copper
c. 5000 BCE
Sailboat invented
c. 5000 BCE
Writing invented
c. 5000 BCE
Humans begin populating Caribbean islands, and megafauna quickly go extinct c. 4500 BCE
Mass warfare begins
c. 4000 BCE
White skin appears
c. 4000 BCE
Humans arrive at Saint Paul Island, and isolated dwarf mammoths quickly go extinct
c. 3800 BCE
Wheel invented
c. 3500 BCE
Bronze invented
c. 3300 BCE
Harappan civilization appears
c. 3300 BCE
Egyptian civilization appears
c. 3100 BCE
Rice paddy system invented
c. 3000 BCE
First literate civilization
c. 3000 BCE
Polynesian expansion begins
c. 3000-1000 BCE
Construction of necropolis at Giza
c. 2570-to-2470 BCE
Humans arrive at Wrangel Island, and the last mammoths on Earth quickly go extinct
c. 2500-2000 BCE
Egypt’s Old Kingdom ends
c. 2200 BCE
First civilization becomes depopulated
c. 2000 BCE
Bronze Age civilizations rise and collapse
c. 2700-to-1150 BCE
Harappan civilization collapses
c. 1800-to-1700 BCE
Olmec civilization appears
c. 1600-1500 BCE
Egyptian civilization at its height
c. 1350
First iron age begins
c. 1300 BCE
Trojan War fought
c. 1200 BCE
Peak influence of Phoenician civilization
c. 1200-to-800 BCE
Bantu Expansion Begins
c. 1000 BCE
Madagascar discovered, megafauna quickly go extinct
c. 1000 BCE
Rome founded
c. 750 BCE
Assyria destroys Kingdom of Israel
c. 722 BCE
Greece begins to recover from collapse of Mycenaean civilization
c. 700 BCE
Gautama Buddha born
c. 560-480 BCE
Athens enters its classic phase
508 BCE
First Mesoamerican state appears
c. 500 BCE
Victory in 50-year-war with Persia marks height of classic Greek civilization 449 BCE
War with Sparta, and devastating epidemic, marks decline of Athens
431-to-404 BCE
Alexander the Great conquers numerous civilizations with a military prowess unsurpassed until industrialized warfare 336- to-323 BCE
Watermill invented, probably by Greek engineers c. 300-250 BCE
Rome begins first war with Carthage
264 BCE
Paper invented
c. 200 BCE
Rome destroys Carthage and Corinth, enslaving the survivors
146 BCE
Roman civil wars begin that end the republic c. 133 BCE
Defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra mark end of Roman republic and beginning of Roman empire 31 BCE
Jesus born
c. 7-4 BCE
Rome invades Great Britain
43 CE (all subsequent dates in this table are CE)
Windmill and steam engine invented
c. 50
Rome defeats Second Jewish revolt against Roman rule 73
Moche culture appears
c. 100
Antonine plague ravages Roman Empire, kills two emperors, and marks end of Peace of Rome 165-180
Plague of Cyprian scourges Rome
250-270
Polynesians discover Hawaii
c. 300-800
Christianity becomes Rome’s state religion
325-to-380

Roman imperial capital moved to Constantinople 330
Horse collar invented
4th century
Rome falls to Germanic tribes
476
Plague of Justinian kills up to half of Europe 541-542
Muhammad born
c. 570
Cahokia settled
c. 600
Arabs begin enslaving Africans
c. 650
Islamic Moors invade Iberian Peninsula
711
Mayan civilization collapses
c. 750-to-950
Viking expansion
c. 787-to-early-1000s
Medieval Warm Period begins
c. 800
European watermills begin great proliferation
c. 1000
Chinese horse collar used in Europe
c. 1000
England conquered from France; peasantry begin dispossession 1066
Christian conquest of Toledo results in Greek teachings being reintroduced into Europe 1085
First Crusade
1096
Fourth Crusade sacks “ally” Constantinople 1204
Albigensian Crusade
1209
Rise and fall of Mongol empire
1206-to-1368

Mexica people arrive in Valley of Mexico, later known as Aztecs
c. 1248
Medieval Warm Period ends c. 1250
Maoris discover New Zealand and drive megafauna to extinction in about a century, maybe less c. 1250-1300
Queen Eleanor driven from Nottingham by cloud of coal smoke
1257
Series of European famines mark beginning of Little Ice Age 1304-1315
England and France begin more than 100 years of warfare
1337
Black Death sweeps Old World
c. 1338-1350
Renaissance begins, rise of humanism in Europe Late 1300s
Cahokia abandoned, likely due to environmental overtaxation, Mississippian civilization begins its decline
c. 1400
China mounts naval expeditions in Indian Ocean and in Pacific Ocean near Southeast Asia 1405-to-1433
Portugal begins sailing the Atlantic Ocean
1420
Aztecs form the Triple Alliance that dominates the Valley of Mexico 1428
Portugal initiates new era of slavery with captured Africans
1434
Incan expansion begins
1438
Printing press invented
c. 1439
Ottoman conquest of Constantinople
1453
Portuguese naval expedition crosses the southern tip of Africa. 1488
Columbus stumbles into Western Hemisphere, and European conquest of humanity begins. 1492



Event Date
Columbus returns to Caribbean with invasion force 1493
First gold strike on Española, initiating century-long quest for gold in Western Hemisphere. 1499
Portuguese Vasco de Gama expedition returns after expedition reaches India by sailing around Africa
1499
Portugal launches military expedition to conquer spice trade
1500
Martin Luther begins Protestant Revolution
1517
Spanish conquest of Aztecs provided greatest proselytizing opportunity ever for Catholic Church, the same year that they condemn Martin Luther 1521
Magellan expedition is first to circumnavigate Earth
1522
Henry VIII kicks Catholic Church out of England
1534
English ironworks established for the first time since the Roman invasion 1543
First works of modern science published 1543
Michael Servetus burned at the stake for his “heresies” in Protestant Geneva 1553
The Spanish crown goes bankrupt, in the first of several bankruptcies that mark its imperial decline 1557
The Inquisition begins banning “heretical” books
1559
French Wars of Religion begin
1562
Spanish establish permanent presence in Philippines
1565
Dutch revolt against Spanish rule begins 1566
Portuguese nobility, including its king, annihilated by Moors when they invade north Africa
1578
Francis Drake returns from pirate expedition that circumnavigates Earth, and becomes England’s richest private citizen 1580
Spanish armada destroyed engaging the English and Dutch 1588
Giordano Bruno burned at the stake for his heresies 1600
English East India Company founded
1600
Dutch East India Company founded
1602
English make first visit to New England, and note the prodigious forests that could be used for sailing ship masts 1602
King James campaigns against smoking tobacco
1604
English establish Ulster Plantation
1606
English establish Jamestown
1607
French establish Montreal
1611
Dutch establish Jakarta
1619
English begin invading New England
1620
Dutch establish Fort Amsterdam
1625
Galileo Galilee forced to recant his scientific findings by the Inquisition 1633
English civil wars begin
1642
Thirty Years’ War ends
1648
Western Hemisphere’s population about nine million, down from 30-100 million in 1491, for history’s greatest demographic catastrophe
1650
English and Dutch begin series of wars
1652
Dutch establish Cape Town
1652
Isaac Newton invents calculus
1666
War between France and Netherlands ends, marking the decline of Dutch power 1678
Scotland formally unites with England to become the United Kingdom 1707
Abraham Darby founds first successful iron-smelting operation based on coal 1709
Thomas Newcomen builds first commercial steam engine 1710
Voltaire imprisoned for his satirical writings
1717
Isaac Newton loses life’s fortune speculating in the slave trade 1720
Abolition movements begin in Europe c. 1750
Britain wins first global war, defeating France 1763
Britain begins conquering India, beginning with Bengal
1764
First British-induced famine hits Bengal
1770
James Cook “discovers” Australia
1770
James Cook nearly reaches Antarctica, turned back by ice
1773-1774
James Watt installs first commercial application of his steam engine 1776
Adam Smith publishes first work of classical political economy 1776
French-assisted American Revolution begins
1776
Antoine Lavoisier falsifies phlogiston theory of combustion
1777
James Cook “discovers” Hawaii
1778
George Washington crafts plan to steal North America from its natives. 1782
First steamboat built
1783
French Revolution begins
1789
First steam locomotive built
1804
Napoleon defeated at Waterloo
1815
Sadi Carnot published first work on thermodynamics
1824
USA steals more than half of Mexico
1836-to-1848
Britain invades China under principles of “free trade”; first use of steam-driven naval ships in warfare 1839
American whaling peaks
1847
Karl Marx publishes his Communist Manifesto
1848
California Gold Rush begins
1848
USA invades Japan
1853
First industrial war begins
1853
Darwin publishes Origin of the Species
1859
First commercial oil well drilled in the West
1859
USA’s Civil War begins
1861
John Rockefeller enters oil industry
1863
USA’s transcontinental railroad completed
1869
John Rockefeller’s empire controls 95% of the USA’s oil refining; Rockefeller soon becomes history’s richest human 1879
Final massacre of American Indians
1890
Tesla’s alternating current technology wins “war” with Edison’s direct current 1891
Americans overthrow Hawaiian monarchy
1893
USA steals last remaining shreds of Spain’s empire
1898
Wright brothers first fly
1903
Ford Motor Company established
1903
Panama gains “independence” via robber baron swindling of the USA’s government
1903
Albert Einstein publishes first paper on relativity
1905
Mark Twain publishes King Leopold’s Soliloquy to protest the “philanthropic” genocide in the Congo
1905
Method developed to artificially fix nitrogen
1909
Greatest international balance of payment between the UK and India
1910
Winston Churchill begins converting the British Navy from coal to oil
1911
Income tax amendment and Federal Reserve Act passed
1913
World War I begins
1914
Company controlled by notable “philanthropist” John Rockefeller uses machine guns on striking coal miners
1914
Einstein publishes general theory of relativity
1915
Russian Revolution
1917
First confirmation of general theory of relativity
1919
Modern quantum theory invented
1925
Public relations campaign to addict American women to tobacco begins
1929
Great Depression begins with stock market crash
1929
Fluorine ion discovered as cause of tooth mottling
1931
Hitler comes to power
1933
Attempted White House coup
1933
World War II begins
1939
World War II ends with nuclear weapons dropped on cities
1945
Post-war boom of unprecedented prosperity 1945
Communist Revolution begins
1946
National Security Act passed, CIA founded
1947
Public relations campaign begins for putting fluoride ion in water supply as tooth “medicine.” 1947
The CIA begins overthrowing elected governments on behalf of corporate interests
1953
American Medical Association stops promoting tobacco in its journal
1954
Sputnik launch begins space race
1957
World War III narrowly averted
1962
John Kennedy murdered
1963
USA invades Southeast Asia
1964
Apollo 11 lands on the moon
1969
Peak oil production reached
1970
West’s first oil crisis marks end of post-war boom; American energy consumption and wages peak, and have since declined 1973
USA lures Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan
1979
Three Mile Island nuclear accident
1979
Chernobyl nuclear disaster
1986
The USA uses the threat of trade sanctions to open Asian markets to tobacco companies, to addict their populations, using familiar “free market” principles.
1986
Soviet Bloc begins fragmenting, Berlin Wall falls
1989
USA attacks Iraq to begin invading the oil-rich Middle East 1991
Soviet Union collapses
1991
Internet revolution begins
c. 1996
Terror attacks on September 11
2001
USA invades Afghanistan
2001
USA invades Iraq, with imperial nation assistance 2003
Peak oil production reached
c. 2006
Financial panic
2008
Gulf oil spill
2010
Fukushima nuclear disaster
2011

Wade Frazier
8th May 2014, 23:05
Hi:

Also, the note count is 801 right now, and 38 pages long. I have a few notes that are little sections in of themselves, but I only have about a dozen like that. The rest are just straight references.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 02:23
Hi:

As I get ready to rejoin the workaday world and ponder the kinds of problems that have attended the FE pursuit, I am more convinced than ever that there cannot be any self-seeking in the effort that I will mount. There will be no money in it, and although those I will work with will be public figures in that they will not hide behind anonymity, there will be little of the lure of becoming the “messiah” or other ego-traps. It will not be a place for heroes to come save the day. The effort will never sell equipment. If it ever falls to that effort to actually make an FE device, it will be given away. Of course, that eliminates almost all inventors from consideration, as I never saw an inventor, especially in the FE field, who was not trying to get rich. That is all part of the conundrum.

The upcoming essay has several purposes. At its most basic, it is intended to help those willing to do the work achieve comprehensive perspectives, because when they do, they will understand the critical role of energy in our world and what the potential of FE is. If they are whom I will be looking for, that alone will be enough to keep their attention on the issue, and they will lend a hand, if only by focusing their awareness. The effort will do its best to take a path consistent with the goal. Again, finding the people that can do it will be the hard part. I know they are very rare, but the Internet makes finding them much easier.

As I near the end of this process, I am coming up with tidbits here and there that I would not have come up with if I had not written the essay, like the idea of a trillion energy slaves that the industrialized world is riding on:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=831592&viewfull=1#post831592

Numbers like that should help the energy issue come into focus.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 12:34
Hi:

I often find myself wandering around in topics that I write about. In recent months, as well as this morning, I was looking into Jimmy Carter and UFOs.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#presidents

Steven Greer wrote about Carter’s failed attempts to expose the issue when he became president. As I read this account not long ago:

http://www.presidentialufo.com/jimmy-carter/93-jimmy-carter-ufo

The name Daniel Sheehan jumped out at me. He was a big time attorney, and founded the Christic institute:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christic_Institute

Like our attorney in Ventura:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#bigtime

Sheehan took on the big guns. I subscribed to their magazine in 1990, as I was getting educated in the media:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lies.htm#big

and I got a call from them, as they were desperate for money after an unprecedented million dollar fine was levied on them for daring to bring one of their lawsuits:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Sheehan_%28attorney%29#The_Iran-Contra_Affair

http://articles.latimes.com/1992-01-14/news/mn-262_1_high-court

The federal judge who levied the fine worked with gangsters and the CIA (they are fellow travelers, more like competing predators in the same shark tank, with the CIA using the mob when they need to – think of the JFK hit, among others). Our attorney received similar treatment from the federal courts:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#disbar

The basic situation is that people like Sheehan and our attorney could beat the IRS in the USA’s Supreme Court, work directly for the USA’s sitting president, take on the Pentagon, and engage in high profile activities like that. But if they begin snooping into the cloak-and-dagger world, such as UFOs and FE, then the gloves come off and they are quickly put in their place. It is no “conspiracy theory,” but the kinds of harsh lessons that national-level attorneys received when they began stepping on big toes. The USA and the world are basically run by gangsters who make the Mafia look like kindergarteners. They know what I am up to, but so far, they only watch, and I plan to play at a level where that is all that they do.

I may have some so-called “white hat” protection, but I am not counting on it. What I am planning to do does not call for anybody to be a hero, but to just wake up and learn to sing. Godzilla’s greatest triumph is keeping the Great Herd asleep, and that is the situation that I am attempting to rectify (but I am only hoping to help wake up 0.0001% of it, and they will be people who have already largely awakened). I am constantly approached by newbie enthusiasts with their naïve “bright ideas.” I don’t tell them that they are naïve, but I just nod and go about my business. It can be frustrating, however, and when they keep on with their “bright ideas” because they have some kind of access to me, I sometimes dissuade them in more frank terms, but I hate when it comes to that. It usually means the end of the relationship, as they cannot handle the idea that they have not even left the sand box but think that they can play with the big boys. Then, they attack me. It just comes with the territory of what I do, and I will be very careful about whom I invite into the choir. It has to be a no-naïveté zone. I may have to have some kind of holding cell for naïve newbies, where they get it out of their system in a safe place before progressing any further. Usually, they have to get some kind of experience playing at those levels to begin to understand, and that is another reason why I know that I am looking for needles in haystacks.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 14:28
Hi:

Because of my professional background, I read up daily on financial matters, including global ones. I recently wrote about the insanity that is still alive and well in the financial world:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/savings.htm#coming

It used to be largely confined to the industrialized nations, but now it is impacting developing nations:

http://www.sovereignman.com/finance/the-bubble-expands-no-money-down-loans-come-to-asia-14405/

In early 2006, I was in a tax class in Chicago, given by an Indian instructor. I clearly saw what was coming, and asked him what would happen when millions of American homes became walkaways. He said that Americans would then face some hard lessons. He said that in India, when people borrow money and do not pay it back, somebody breaks their legs. For those following events over the past several years, some banks indeed chased after walk away homeowners, and the problem may rear its head again, when this new bubble pops:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aIf_vUQZFt.s

http://realestate.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=25923795

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/01/21/Should-Mortgage-Giants-Pursue-Borrowers-Who-Walked-Away

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/01/21/Should-Mortgage-Giants-Pursue-Borrowers-Who-Walked-Away

Not only is the tune a familiar one these days:

http://www.sovereignman.com/trends/nasa-study-collapse-is-very-difficult-to-avoid-13889/

it is reaching global proportions. As Bucky Fuller said, it is a race between education and catastrophe. With FE, all of that quickly disappears.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 15:08
Hi:

Probably the biggest reason why I do not expect to have a large audience for my essay is that its message is unpopular in many ways. Almost all people have a deep aversion to understanding it, largely because it argues that we all have a hand in what has been happening:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#responsibility

and almost everybody wants to play the victim, either denying the reality of our world or denying their responsibility for it. If we all are responsible, that also means that we can all help change it. Victims do not engage in productive activities; only creators do. My editor, whom I have had since the 1990s, recently said that my message finally dawned on her, after nearly fifteen years of being intimately familiar with my work. She said that my message of acknowledging the hyper-elite games but not focusing on them went right over her head until very recently. She acknowledged that focusing on the “bad guys” can give people something to focus their rage and fear on, but she finally saw how it led to feelings of powerlessness and self-defeat. If it took my editor (and one of my greatest supporters) about 15 years for my message to really sink in, what chance does the average newcomer have?

That is an example of where I say that it all starts in the heart. People coming from a victim-oriented and fearful perspective are defeated before they begin (those levels below Level 12, all except for Level 0 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level01 ). And that goes not only for conspiracists, but structuralists who have created a little cottage industry of their own that seems sometimes dedicated to denying Godzilla’s existence. In this month’s Z Magazine, an article grappled with the issue, and again really did not grasp the big picture, and obviously had an aversion to really seeing it. This is a long-standing problem with them:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#rockefeller

that I do not expect they will overcome anytime soon. They are one of the only groups on Earth that I ever saw with much promise, but they were totally boxed in with their orthodox perspectives, and they avidly feted people like Heinberg, with his drumbeat of doom:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#_edn7

while Brian O was totally shut out from all such venues. Again, almost nobody understands or seems to want to. The rad left is largely comprised of Young Warrior types:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#warriors

and they have even openly admitted it, stating that their “protests” were intended to “coerce” elites into giving up their power. What they cannot admit to themselves is that the elites only play their games with the power that the public had abdicated. Brian O said it best when he stated that “combined positive intention” was the only path to making FE and a healed planet happen. Coercion, fingering the “bad guys,” conspiracism, and the like are the province of people who see themselves as victims, and it will not work, not for bringing FE and abundance to the world. Only a loving approach has a prayer of success, but is far easier said than done in a world of scarcity, fear, and an alive and vigilant Godzilla.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
9th May 2014, 15:21
It is pretty darn hard no think like a victim... :)

After reading Wade's website and one if Dennis' book it's rather easy to conclude: "We're screwed!"

It sure looks like the Global Controllers have all the power and we are just subjects at their mercy. Sometimes I feel small and insignificant, other times I am enraged by what is going on or I drop in apathy.

But the fact remains, that information is still out there, freely and easily accessible, should you care to read it and strive to understand it. The internet has not been shut down, digital books are easier than ever to distribute and virtually impossible to burn. So staying in "victim mode" is a choice, even if it does not feel like that most of the time :).

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 15:36
Hi Ilie.

Amen. This is the crux of the conundrum. It is easy to feel small and insignificant (and some overcompensate and see themselves as the messiah :) ), but I have seen how one man, with a damned small group of supporters, gave Godzilla some interesting days at the office and survived to try again. In some ways, Dennis’s story should be inspiring. Look at what a handful of people had going.

I admit that because Dennis and I had a voice in our heads that piped up at pivotal moments, we realize that there is far more going on than meets the eye. I do not subscribe to Dennis’s Christian notions, but I can also see a great deal of enlightenment in them. There is something far bigger than us all at play here, and if we can align with love, that is the path to freedom.

As my essay will make clear, every epochal event was initiated by only a few people, and it was always an energy breakthrough where new levels of energy were harnessed through new technologies, going back to the first stone tool.

With the active inertia in our system, not only from Godzilla and friends, but how almost everybody else staked out their niche of hell and won’t budge, this hump will be harder to get over, but it is also the biggest hump of all, so the prevailing inertia seems strangely appropriate. Those of us with voices in our heads and experiencing similar preposterous events know that we “asked” for this duty, although that can be faint comfort when you are on the battlefield being shot at.

To your final point, yes, the information is vastly more available than it was when Dennis and I were getting “educated” in the 1980s. There is also a great deal of disinformation, and what was kind of surprising at first was how many of the most persistent and damaging attacks on Dennis came from within the ranks of the FE “community.” Boy, is the enemy ever us. :)

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 16:52
Hi:

Quickly, one of the first things that virtually all FE newcomers do, once they begin to glimpse the issue, is proselytize to their friends, family, and co-workers, and look for potential allies among various groups, surf the Internet, watch YouTube videos, and the like. Or they think they have some bright idea that nobody ever thought of before, usually within a few minutes or days after hearing about FE for the first time. In short, they are looking for some quick and easy answer. Anybody who hopes to help out what I am doing needs to relinquish those notions, and the sooner the better. As far as I have seen, what I am doing has never been attempted before, and I have not seen anybody else with a message like mine. Brian’s was close in ways, but he really did not go through the FE meat grinder and get radicalized like I did, Dennis is still busy playing Indiana Jones, and the like. Everybody is human, with their particular foibles, and the goal among FE aspirants is to play to their strengths and try to prevent their weaknesses from damaging their efforts.

I have stated many times that impatience is my Achilles heel:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#reading

and forty years of the FE pursuit has sure been teaching it to me, but I still have a ways to go. Anybody who wants to rush out and “do something” cannot be involved with my upcoming efforts, I am sorry. They will be a danger to themselves and those around them. Anybody who comes up for air after first encountering my essay, in anything less than a few months, will probably not be in my target audience. One intention of the essay is a self-study class, where readers can do most of the work on their own, and not be dependent on people like me. I will still be there to help when aspirants for the choir come up for air, but I want to help people begin to reach the higher-level understandings, not the newbie stuff that I am bombarded with on nearly a daily basis. We need to aim far higher.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 19:27
Hi:

Between chores, briefly…

To the befuddlement of many around me, trapped in their paradigm, I am not seeking to make money with my work, not trying to parlay it into an advanced degree or a job, and will be giving my work away. To them, it seems as if I am not “doing anything,” or anything that will make a difference. They seem to be largely well-intended, but have assumed a level of selfishness of me and those I hope to interact with that would be highly counterproductive to the task, but they cannot break out of the selfishness paradigm, and they then project their framework onto others. They truly have not glimpsed what I am trying to accomplish.

And for those I seek, I am asking for far more than money from them. If they do the work, they are going to lose the last vestige of the comforting fictions that they were raised with and often use, in one way or another, to make a living, cope with the world, meet their social needs, and the like. I will be asking a great deal of those whom I hope to interact with: I will be asking them to develop an awareness that is radically different than the mainstream’s. I offer information and perceptions far beyond the New Age or conspiracist flavor the day, but those I plan to interact with have either already done most of the work, with me only adding some new data points to their framework, or they will need to do some very heavy lifting, lifting that they may regret, if they have no idea what they are in for.

In the aftermath of one of my disasters with Dennis, somebody close to me said that what he really resented in being involved with Dennis was losing his complacency. He was all comfy in his easy chair, planning out the rest of his easy life, and then along came Dennis, thinking that we could change the world. When I was with Dennis, I always said “Change the world,” while Dennis said, “Save the world.” I doubt that Dennis meant it the way that I understand it today, but “Save the world” is likely more accurate.

So, those who tie into my work tread dangerous territory, and in the past, I designed my work so that most people blow a fuse a few pages into my work and stop reading. I did that partly for their protection. But for those I seek, what blows the gaskets of the masses will be something they have thirsted for, and if I may be so bold, I think it is something like a quest for the truth.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 20:01
Hi:

One more thought before it is back to work…

I have stated that I hope to bridge-the-gap a little, between the needles in haystacks and those who are a little more common, and increase the odds of amassing enough people for my approach to have a chance. Make no mistake, it is also about the numbers, but it is like Martin Luther King, Jr. said, that he would rather march with one person who understood why they were marching than a hundred that did not. Basically, Dennis always amassed an “army” who did not really understand the battle plan or goal.

Many readers of my essay are going to get bogged down early on and want to skip to the end, and they will get out of the experience what they put into it. One reason for the approach I am taking is for my readers to develop a big picture awareness of the journey of life on Earth, and see where humans enter the play. When they can really do that, and come to appreciate it, they will have an easier time not getting stuck in the egocentric levels of awareness of the FE Onion (1-to-11 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level1 ), and reach something that could be called soul-centric. It should help them more readily shed not only those scarcity-based ideologies and their insidious assumptions:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

but also understand why approaches rooted in such ideologies are doomed to failure for this task. I constantly encounter FE newbies who think that they understand, when they have not yet begun to understand, as they drag around their scarcity-based security blankets. We have to let go of that baggage if we are going to get anywhere. Godzilla is the master of using people’s allegiance to those ideologies to enslave their minds and spirits. As I stated in the previous post, what I will be asking of my readers will be anything but easy, and can actually be quite dangerous if caution is not exercised. But for those who use it properly, it can help increase their understanding.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
9th May 2014, 22:43
Hi:

Well, I finally got to the end of adding tidbits from my list of things to do, and the last one is below:

“Social cohesion was not attained solely by the benefits of social interactions, but also punishments when individuals did not pull their economic weight in a society, called freeloading and other terms. Scientist have developed a concept called reciprocal altruism that is not altruistic at all (giving without an expectation of individual gain), but more of a societal accounting concept, where universal cooperation is seen as good for all of society’s members, where acts of “altruism” will eventually be “reciprocated” by some member of the society, if not the member initially helped. A trait of UP is ensuring that exchanges are fair and punishing cheaters. The carrots and sticks of rewards and punishments are probably as old as the earliest social animals, but as with all areas like this, humans have achieved the most sophisticated behaviors.”

You cannot see the footnotes to a paragraph like that, but that one refers to:

http://news.sciencemag.org/2012/07/punishing-cheaters-are-we-dark-knight%E2%80%94or-just-dark

http://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/ScienceSuppMat.pdf

http://scienceblogs.com/primatediaries/2010/05/18/punishing-cheaters/

I am sure that I will think of more tidbits in the coming months before I publish the essay, and will add them in.

I can finally really put my editor’s hat on for the first time, and will play that game for a couple of weeks before I send the first draft off to my pals.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
10th May 2014, 15:54
Hi:

Just a minute ago, I finished the last of my “to do” items for drafting the essay. The next couple of weeks will be spent wearing my editor’s hat before I send it off to real editors and other pals who will pound on it for a couple of months. Whew!

As I have written plenty, there is no doubt that I am on Godzilla’s radar, but I think I am low enough on it so that he does not have to get actively involved in what I am doing. So far, I have not seen people who just write in the West about FE meeting untimely demises or being thrown into prison. But I am trying something unique, and have been caught flat-footed by Godzilla before. I made provisions to have the essay published in the event of my untimely demise, although my plan is that plan is never used. :)

So, phase one of my latest effort is now behind me. I am planning for this effort to last the rest of my life or until FE makes its appearance on the world stage. It will fill a gap that I saw in all FE efforts, and may even be the root of an independent FE effort arising. Who knows what it could lead to, but building a foundation to grow from is the most important part, as far as I have seen.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
11th May 2014, 15:33
Hi:

Part of me thought that I would take a little break, but no, I had to dive right into the editing. Below is the current version of the essay’s end, and outlines a critical aspect of what I am doing. I am already getting responses from allies that are not aligned with what I am doing, as they want to drag the discussion into the rabbit holes of various fringe topics that they have a limited grasp of, which would be irrelevant to my essay even if valid, and the like.

One dynamic that I will have to fight off is all those people suffering from Level 10 delusions:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

who will want to immediately mount some kind of stampede toward FE. That reaction will be potentially the most disastrous. The only people I plan to interact with and try to recruit into the choir will not come up for air for months after beginning to read the essay. Readers of this thread have seen innumerable reactions to my work that are along the lines of inventor-itis, stampede-itis, not beginning to understand the role of energy, who want to drag it down into mystical rabbit holes, and the like, and this forum is a cut far above what is out there in all-comers-cyberspace. I understand the pressure of wanting to “do something,” believe me. During my adventures with Dennis, one of his favorite sayings was “There are the quick, and the dead.” For navigating the capitalistic shark tank, that is true, but it also led to half-cocked approaches doomed to failure for bringing FE to the world. I am doing something radically different, and the primary goal of my work is to help people relinquish their scarcity-based baggage, think comprehensively, hold the vision, and learn to sing. Nobody has ever succeeded before in amassing such a “mass” awareness and choir; I doubt that anybody has even tried.

There are going to be opportunists, silver-tongued sociopaths, and Godzilla’s agents snooping around, and many who have been trying to create some kind of stampede are going to think that they finally found their vehicle. I have seen it all, many times.

While I will likely do a little “promotion” of the essay after I publish it, like some interviews, I am going to be avoiding any kind of “bandwagon” approach, and resist people trying to fold my work into their stampede efforts.

Best,

Wade

So, here is the finale as it currently exists:

The path to developing FE technology for public use outlined above I believe can work, but there are also other ways that the Fifth Epochal Event can manifest. If I had to bet on how it will manifest, I would put my money on the struggle between the darkest faction of the GCs losing to the saner members, and them beginning to release some of their sequestered technologies. The reason why their organized suppression efforts have been totally successful is that they know if any of it makes it to the public, it will only be a matter of time before the dam breaks, which would likely include ETs openly interacting with humanity. The GCs know that if any of that happens, their days of ruling humanity will quickly end. That is partly why this hump has been so hard to get over. But I am not going to wait for something to happen at that level to save us all, and what I am attempting will also help form a nucleus of awareness that can greatly help with an enlightened and harmless implementation of FE. If FE makes its appearance, its implementation will need to be led by as many enlightened and informed people as possible. Some need to be ahead of the curve to lead the way, if only by promoting an enlightened awareness. Once people can see FE with their own eyes, preferably by having it delivered to their home (anything less, and they will not awaken; they will not be talked into an abundance-based mentality; they must experience it ), the awakening process should be pretty rapid, especially if there is already an abundance choir singing.

I found that if people are candidates for the choir, they are so rare that there will not be anybody in their daily lives who also is. The maximum social circle that most people can manage is a few hundred people, but I am looking for something like 1-in-5,000 (it might be as auspicious as 1-in-1,000, but I have my doubts, and might be a far smaller proportion) so the odds are that those prospective choir members will not have anybody among their families, friends, and colleagues who can also learn the song and sing it. That is just the reality of the numbers, which it took me years of harsh learning to understand. The social-circle approach will not work for what I have in mind, but I am using a new technology with a global reach to find those needles in haystacks. Also, a primary purpose of this essay is to improve those odds. Make no mistake, it is also about the numbers, but it is like Martin Luther King, Jr. said, that he would rather march with one person who understood why they were marching than a hundred who did not. Essentially, Dennis always amassed “armies” that did not really understand the goal, and mutiny attempts came early and often.

I developed my current approach by trial and error that was extremely hazardous and painful, and took most of a lifetime to achieve. I hope that this essay can help shorten the learning curve for those whom I seek. Many readers of this essay will get bogged down early on and skip to the end, and they will get out of the experience what they put into it. Such people are not in my target audience, unless they have already mastered this essay’s material, but I have never met such a person. I will continue studying this subject matter for the remainder of my life, and have a ways to go before I could consider my grasp of it firm. This essay is largely intended to help readers develop a comprehensive awareness of life’s journey on Earth, and see where humanity enters the play. When readers can do that and come to appreciate it, they will have an easier time avoiding the egocentric levels of FE awareness (1-to-11), and reach something that might be called soul-centric. It should help them shed not only those scarcity-based ideologies and their insidious, scarcity-based assumptions, but they should also begin to understand why approaches rooted in such ideologies are doomed to failure for this task. We cannot drag our scarcity-based baggage with us for establishing a world of abundance. The GCs are masters of using people’s allegiance to those ideologies to enslave their minds and spirits. What I will be asking of my target audience will be anything but easy, and can actually be quite dangerous if caution is not exercised. But for those who use this material properly, it can help boost their awareness.

Concepts such as open-sourcing and crowdfunding have come from the Internet culture, and are steps in the right direction. Even high-tech potentates such as Bill Gates live relatively humbly. The Internet is a precursor to the kind of communication system that will be enjoyed in the Fifth Epochal Phase of the human journey. There will be others, but the Fifth Epochal Event will likely mark a fundamental shift from scarcity to abundance, and human civilization will transform in ways that nobody today can really fathom, even though there have been many hints of what that could look like (1, 2). When love and abundance reign instead of fear and scarcity, the human journey will radically transform in ways that are currently unimaginable. Making them at least partly imaginable has become my life’s work, and time will tell if it helps move the needle or not. As the great Bucky Fuller said, we are facing utopia or oblivion. Which one will we choose?

Wade Frazier
12th May 2014, 01:35
Hi:

On the essay’s reference, they are largely to orthodox sources, but not always, and there are important exceptions. Some are to technologies with proven “impossible” performance, such as Rife’s and Naessens’s microscopes, and Brown’s Gas. Others are to exercises that I have never seen orthodoxy perform, such as the estimate of excess deaths in India under British rule:

https://sites.google.com/site/palestinegenocideessays/churchill-s-crimes-from

With many genocides and similar atrocities committed by the imperial powers, there are not even attempts to quantify the deaths and suffering, which is highly telling in of itself.

When that study was released in 2006 on the violent deaths due to the USA’s invasion of Iraq:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_surveys_of_Iraq_War_casualties

what disgusted me the most were the attacks on it coming from so-called progressives. It was kind of similar in the wake of Fukushima, where I saw more pro-nuclear propaganda than I ever saw before, which is saying something, and a lot of it came from “progressives” and even “environmentalists.” I cite Ward Churchill’s work in my essay, and for good reason, as he was about the best scholar out there on the West’s crimes against the American Indian. I watched the railroad job on him as it progressed, where they nailed him about like they did with Dennis, where he failed to file a form. But Churchill’s work was not unorthodox because it did not follow the process, but because his message is so at variance with the orthodox drumbeat. I respect the process of science and history, but it is not really used much for topics deemed off-limits by the social managers. Scholars like Churchill can take on such taboo topics, but they risk their careers, and Churchill’s got snuffed out by an inquisition. That is too common.

But there does not need to be too much “radical” stuff in my essay to get across my primary messages, which is how energy runs the world and always has. Sure, FE is “radical, but again, the vast energy in the ZPF was even hypothesized by Einstein’s protégé, so there really is little that is fundamentally “radical” about it. My approach is radical, but the information is not so much, other than maybe the FE adventures of my fellow travelers and me.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
13th May 2014, 14:35
Hi:

I am merrily editing away. The most important editing so far has been eliminating the repetition that crept into it during the writing process. I have ended up consolidating treatment of a subject that was scattered throughout the essay into one place. If I had to guess, that is probably what most of the editing will be concerned with. I have been fiddling quite a bit with an early and important chapter, and below is what it currently looks like. It also has several lengthy footnotes that deal with pertinent topics, such as Wikipedia’s reliability, examples of disruptive technologies, many of which have been suppressed, and background on some orthodox controversies.

Back to work and chores.

Best,

Wade


The Orthodox Framework and its Limitations

In the West, the conception of the physical universe and humanity’s ability to manipulate it has remarkably changed in the past few thousand years, which has been a tiny fraction of humanity‘s journey on Earth. Thousands of years ago, Greek philosophers Democritus and Leucippus theorized that the universe was comprised of atoms and the void, and Pythagoras taught that Earth orbited the sun. Greeks also invented the watermill during the same era. Hundreds of years later, a Greek mathematician and engineer, Heron of Alexandria, invented the first steam engine and windmill. Western science and technology did not significantly advance for the next millennium, however, until ancient Greek writings were reintroduced to the West via captured Islamic libraries. The reintroduction of the Greek teachings, and the pursuit of their energy technologies, ultimately led to the Industrial and Scientific Revolutions.

Scientific practice is ideally a process of theory and experimentation that can lead to new theories. There are three general aspects of the scientific process. First, facts are adduced. Facts are phenomena that everybody can agree on, ideally produced under controlled experimental conditions which can be reproduced by other experimenters. Hypotheses are then proposed to account for the facts. The hypotheses are usually concerned with how the universe works, whether it is star formation or evolution. If a hypothesis survives the fact-gathering process – often by predicting facts that later experiments verify – then the hypothesis can graduate to the status of a theory. Scientific theories ideally can be falsified; they can be proven erroneous. The principle of theory falsification is primarily what distinguishes science from other modes of inquiry.

The relegation of hypotheses and theories to oblivion, without getting a fair hearing, with the pioneer dying in obscurity or being martyred, to only be vindicated many years later, is typical of the process of science. The man who first explained the dynamics behind the aurora borealis, Kristian Birkeland, died in obscurity in 1917, with his work attacked and dismissed. It was not until Hannes Alfvén won the 1970 Nobel Prize that Birkeland’s work was finally vindicated. Endosymbiotic theory, the widely accepted theory of how mitochondria, chloroplasts, and other organelles came to be, was first proposed in 1905 and was quickly dismissed, and was not revived until the late 1960s.

When a new hypothesis appears, particularly a radical one, even if it is not a lone pioneer being martyred, the old guard usually attacks the new hypothesis and the situation turns into bitter feuds and armed camps all too often, such as the recent rise of the asteroid impact hypothesis regarding the dinosaurs’ demise. To a degree, those withering attacks are supposed to be how science works. Doubt instead of faith is the guiding principle of science. Until a scientist’s bright idea is tested against the real world, it is just a bright idea. Only hypotheses that have survived numerous attempts to falsify them graduate to becoming theories. It can be argued that the “attack mode” that science has adopted toward new hypotheses has formed a structural bias so that all scientific pioneers will be attacked by their peers; it is simply the nature of the profession. Only scientists who can weather the attacks from their peers will survive long enough to see their hypotheses get a fair hearing. That “shark tank” environment, particularly with lucrative prizes and tenured academic berths awaiting the winners, has arguably set back science’s progress considerably. With what I know has been suppressed by private interests, often with governmental assistance, mainstream science is largely irrelevant regarding many important issues that would theoretically be within its purview. Paradoxically, scientists can also fall for fashionable theories and get on bandwagons. Scientific practice is subject to human foibles, just as all human endeavors are.

There can be self-reinforcing bias in that the prevailing hypotheses can determine what facts are adduced, and potential facts thus escape inquiry, particularly when entire lines of inquiry are forbidden by organized suppression and the excesses of the national security state, as well as the indoctrination that scientists are subject to, as all people are.

Early in the twentieth century, radical theories were proposed that remade scientists’ view of the universe. Along with relativity and quantum theory, a primary pillar of today’s physics is the notion that everything in the universe is a form of energy, as summarized by Einstein’s equation: E = MC2. Although the notion is still challenged in unorthodox corners, today’s prevailing theory is that the universe came into being in an instant called the Big Bang, and stars are the energy centers in the observable universe, powered by nuclear fusion. When the Big Bang supposedly happened, there was no matter, only energy. Only when the universe had sufficiently expanded and cooled, less than a second after the Big Bang, did matter begin to appear, which is considered to be comprised of relatively low energy states. This essay hews fairly closely to today’s orthodox perspective for much of it. However, there will be limitations, and some of them follow.

In the early days of science, it had a quasi-religious stature among its practitioners, and nineteenth-century scientists were prone to calling their hypotheses and theories “laws,” often appending their names to the “laws” as soon as possible, similar to imperialist “explorers” of the era appending European names to landmarks they encountered during their conquests. Brian O’Leary, one of whom this essay is dedicated to the memory of, who was a former astronaut, Ivy League professor, and political activist that explored the frontiers of science, stated that there are no “laws” of physics, only theories, but the term “law” is lodged deeply in the scientific lexicon, although by the twentieth century scientists stopped calling new hypotheses and theories laws. Modest scientists readily admit that the so-called “laws” of science are not the “laws” of the universe, but rather human ideas about what those laws might be, if there are any laws at all. As Einstein and his colleagues readily admitted, the corpus of scientific fact and theory barely says anything at all about how the universe works. Sometimes, paradigms shift and scientists see the universe with fresh eyes. The ideals and realities of scientific practice are often at odds. Ironically, when scientists reach virtual unanimity on a theory, it can be a sign that the theory is about to radically change, and most scientists will go to their graves believing in the theory that they were originally taught, no matter how much evidence weighs against it.

A key tension in mainstream science has long been the conflict between specialists and the generalists and multidisciplinarians. The specialist motto might be, “The devil is in the details.” Deductive reasoning is their specialty. Reductionist principles usually guide their investigations, where breaking down phenomena into their most basic components is the goal. The generalist motto might be, “I seem to see a pattern here.” Generalists often use inductive reasoning and tend to think holistically, usually in terms of systems, and they recognize emergent properties arising from higher levels of systems complexity, and they can be something new and not necessarily inherent in lower levels of complexity, or predictable by analyzing those lower levels.

Specialists are often those on the ground, getting their hands dirty, doing the detailed work that forms the bedrock of scientific practice. Without their efforts, science as we know it today would not exist. However, mainstream science has long suffered from the tunnel vision that overspecialization encourages, and R. Buckminster Fuller thought that the epidemic overspecialization and naïveté of mainstream scientists in his time was a ruling class tactic to keep scientists controlled and not able to see the forest for the trees. That has been slowly changing in my lifetime, where multidisciplinary efforts are crossing disciplinary boundaries and achieving synthetic views that were not feasible in earlier times, with patterns newly recognized that were invisible in a scientific world filled with specialists. Many paradigmatic breakthroughs in science and technology were made by non-professionals, specialists working outside of their field of professional expertise, and generalists traversing disciplinary boundaries. Scientific training today tries to prevent that overspecialized tunnel vision, and today’s practicing scientists ideally get deep into the details and then pull back to try to see context, connections, and patterns. A comprehensivist tries to understand the details well enough to refrain from making unwarranted generalizations, while striving for that big picture awareness. There are also top-down and bottom-up ways to approach analyses, each can provide critical insight, and scientists and other analysts often try to use both.

Another key set of tensions are those between theorists, empiricists, and inventors. Theorists attempt to account for scientific data, and ideally predict data yet to be adduced, which tests the validity of their hypotheses and theories. Empiricists often adduce that scientific data. Inventors create new technologies. Albert Einstein is the quintessential example of a theorist, never performing experiments relating to his theories, but accounting for experimental results and predicting them. Michelson and Morley, who performed the experiment that produced results which various scientists wrestled with for a generation before Einstein proposed his special theory of relativity, never suspected that their experiment would lead to the theories that it did. The most important experiments in science’s history were often those that produced unexpected results. Einstein’s general theory of relativity had no experimental evidence when he proposed it (it explained Mercury’s orbit, but that was the only evidence for it when the theory was proposed), but it has been confirmed numerous times since then. Einstein expected that all of his theories would eventually be falsified by experimental evidence, but the best parts of his theories would survive in the new theories.

The Wright brothers were typical inventors. Before they flew, theorists said that man-powered flight was “impossible,” and mainstream science ignored or ridiculed them for five years after they first flew, and the Smithsonian Institution tried to deny the Wright brothers their rightful precedence for generations. The theorists were spectacularly wrong, the empiricists had abandoned their primary principle of observation, and it was up to inventors to finally open their eyes and minds, years after the public witnessed the new technologies working. Brian O’Leary told me that the scientific establishment’s blindness and denial is worse in the early 21st century than in the Wright brothers’ time.

I have encountered numerous technologies that theorists denounce as “impossible,” empiricists ignore as if they did not exist, while the inventors are not exactly sure why their inventions work, but only know that they do. Such inventions often threaten to upend the very foundations of scientific disciplines, which is primarily why they have been ignored as they have, if they are not actively suppressed. When their breakthroughs threatened the dominance of the industrial/professional rackets, then the risks to those inventors could become deadly.

Quite often, the pioneers of science and technology receive no credit at all, as others steal their work and become rich and famous. But if private and governmental interests do not suppress the data and theory, as is regularly done regarding alternative energy and other disruptive technologies, eventually the data will likely win, even if the pioneers may not receive any credit, or they receive it posthumously. But the data does not always win. The expedient but misleading tale of Louis Pasteur’s triumph in explaining the origins of life, which microbiology students are still taught in college, is an example of the phenomenon of false credit being attributed to a figure who may have also marched the discipline off in the wrong direction, from which it has yet to recover. Another problem has been fabricated “discoveries” that become uncritically accepted by the mainstream, where that ideal “skepticism” of science completely disappears, as powerful interests promote industrial waste as “medicine,” for instance, as was done with fluoridation. It was also done with tobacco smoking, where medical authorities even promoted asbestos cigarette filters, in one of many “believe it or not” episodes in the history of science and medicine. Mercury was sold as “medicine” until my lifetime, and is still found in vaccines, the very theoretical and empirical foundation of which rests on a seemingly shaky foundation. Lead received a similar clean bill of health by industrially funded laboratories, where the conflicts of interest were surreal, with the public completely unaware of who was really managing such public health issues and why. Similar situations are alive and well today.

Perhaps the most significant challenge to mainstream science is the fact that numerous advanced technologies already exist on Earth, including free energy and anti-gravity technologies, but they are being actively kept from public awareness and use. They and other exotic technologies developed in the above-top-secret world operate on principles that make the physics textbooks resemble cave drawings. Thousands of scientists and inventors have independently pursued such technologies, but all such efforts have been suppressed by a clandestine and well-funded effort of global magnitude. But this essay will lay most of that aside until near the essay’s end, other than to note that one of Einstein’s protégés, David Bohm, theorized that space is anything but empty. Einstein also stated that his general theory of relativity resurrected the idea of an ether that his special theory of relativity supposedly rendered obsolete. According to Bohm’s computation, the energy existing in “empty space” is unimaginably vast, where one cubic centimeter of it contains more energy than is contained in all the mass of the known universe. One of Fuller’s pupils not only subscribed to the notion that “empty” space is not empty, but he helped build technologies that harnessed that energy source, and his life’s story, like my former partner’s, is hard to believe, but has impressive evidence for its validity. According to him, the newly discovered Higgs field is only a “rebranding” of what has been called the zero-point field and other names over the years, which is the field that free (AKA “zero-point” and other terms) energy technology taps. I have encountered dozens of instances of scientists with theories that challenge the Standard Model of particle physics, with their primary upshot being a “new” energy source usually called zero-point energy.

But, black projects and “leading edge” theory aside (theory that is far older than I am), technologies have been publicly available for many years whose operation upends some of science’s oldest theories. “White science” (establishment science) has great defects, especially when its pursuit conflicts with deeply entrenched economic and political interests.

Although the greatest physicists were often mystical in their orientation, they rarely explored the nature of consciousness in the way that modern human potential efforts have. When I was sixteen years old, it was demonstrated to me, very dramatically, that everybody inherently possesses psychic abilities, which falsifies the materialistic theories of consciousness. Millions of people had similar experiences during that era when performing such exercises. They are usually life-changing events, available to nearly anybody who devotes the time to experiencing them, but a politically active arm of establishment science, known as organized “skepticism,” has waged a holy war against such evidence for longer than I have been alive. The scientific establishment’s warriors often denigrate such phenomena as “pseudoscience,” which is a term they greatly abuse as they attack ideas and phenomena outside of their ability to investigate or conflict with their materialistic assumptions. In reality, “skeptics” are anti-scientists, as they try to deny that such abilities of consciousness are even worthy of being scientifically investigated. That they defend materialism with flawed logic, dishonesty, and dirty tricks is one thing, but all too often, as I performed the studies that led to this essay, I saw mainstream scientists trust the “skeptics” for their pronouncements on the validity of “paranormal” phenomena. That would be like asking Dominican inquisitors their opinion of the Cathars in 1230.

The holy warriors’ efforts aside, the scientific data is impressive regarding what has been called “psi” and other terms, clearly demonstrating abilities of consciousness that are still denied and neglected by mainstream science. But direct personal experience is far more valuable than all of the experimental evidence that can be amassed, as there is no substitute for it.

Not all mainstream scientists relegate consciousness to a mere byproduct of chemistry. John von Neumann’s interpretation of quantum mechanics is that consciousness is required for the wavefunctions that describe fields at the subatomic level to collapse into observable particles. He was not the only scientist whose theories required consciousness to exist in order for the physical universe to become observable. The greatest physicists knew that materialism was a doctrine built on unprovable assumptions, which amounts to a faith. Forthcoming quantum physicists regard the controversy over the implications of quantum theory as “our skeleton in the closet.” To the end of his life, Einstein was very uncomfortable with the implications of quantum theory, and his disquiet was ahead of its time. French physicist Alain Aspect performed a state-of-the-art test of Bell’s inequality, which helped establish the reality of quantum entanglement, which Einstein derided to his grave as “spooky action at a distance.” When Aspect proposed the experiment to John Bell, Bell’s first question was, “Do you have tenure?”

Mainstream (“White”) science still has almost nothing to say about the nature of consciousness. However, Black Science (covert, largely privatized; the same province where that advanced technology is sequestered) is somewhat familiar with the nature of consciousness, and considers it to be far more than a byproduct of chemistry. The assumption that the entire universe is a manifestation of consciousness is not only unassailable by White Science, but is likely the foundational assumption of Black Science and mystics.

The battle between materialists and religious orders over the years, where materialist evolutionists grapple with creationists and intelligent design proponents, seems to be a feud between two fundamentalist camps. The nature and role of consciousness, both in this dimension and beyond it, are likely far too subtle to be profitably engaged by the level of debate that currently dominates. Scientists such as Einstein were awestruck by the evident intelligence behind the universe’s design, but that did not mean that they believed in a God with a flowing beard. As this essay will explore later, those issues are not merely fodder for idle philosophical pursuit, but at their root lies the crux of the current conundrum that humanity finds itself in, as we race toward our self-destruction.

White Science does not really know what energy is; it can only describe its measurable effects. At its root, there are only two primary components of our universe: energy and consciousness. Everything physical is made of energy, and our consciousness is all that we know. Energy and matter may well be manifestations of consciousness, and large brains could be simply more refined “transducers” for more complex consciousness to gain access to physical reality. There is evidence that evolution is not purely the province of chance mutations, but that organisms can direct their evolution at the genetic level.

The greatest scientists readily admitted that the theories and data of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, drew highly limited descriptions of reality, and those scientists were usually, to one extent or another, mystics. If textbook science falls far short of explaining reality, what can be said within its framework that is useful? Plenty. Our industrialized world is based on textbook science, and feats such as putting men on the Moon were performed within the parameters of textbook science. One limitation of mainstream science is thankfully waning, which is its overspecialization and excessive reliance on reductionism. Since the last decades of 20th century, scientists have been overcoming their overspecialized perspectives, and multidisciplinary efforts are becoming prominent. Multidisciplinary works will tend to dominate the references for this essay, as I have found them not only very helpful for my own understanding, but they are appropriate references for a generalist essay. I have also avoided scientific terminology where feasible. For example, I use “seafloor” instead of “benthic,” and if a common term will suffice for a scientific concept, I will often use it.

The mainstream theory is that matter consists of elementary particles (which are all forms of energy), and their interaction with the Higgs field is responsible for all mass. Almost all mass in the known universe consists of the protons in hydrogen atoms, and those protons are in turn comprised of quarks, and electrons and neutrinos are the other first generation fundamental particles. Protons have a positive electric charge, electrons a negative charge, and neutrinos no net charge. The simplest atom consists of one proton in the nucleus and one electron in “orbit” around it, which is the most common hydrogen atom. Today, mainstream science recognizes four forces in the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces in an atom’s nucleus. Gravity attracts matter to matter, and is thought to be responsible for the formation of stars, planets, and galaxies. The universe seems to be built from processes, not objects.

The Standard Model of particle physics is complex, but the preceding presentation is largely adequate for this essay’s purpose, while it can be helpful to be aware that the physics behind free energy and antigravity technologies will likely render the Standard Model obsolete. If free energy, antigravity, and related technologies finally come in from the shadows, the elusive Unified Field may come with them, and the Unified Field might well be consciousness, which will help unite the scientist and the mystic, and that field may be divine in nature. But that understanding is not necessary to relate the story that White Science tells today of how Earth developed from its initial state to today’s, where complex life is under siege by an ape that quickly spread across the planet like a cancer once it achieved the requisite intelligence, social organization, and technological prowess.

With the above limitations acknowledged, this essay will explore the earthly journeys of life and humanity, and energy’s role in them.


And here are the notes to that chapter, to give you an idea of what they can be like. Most notes are short, just referring to a source, but that chapter is one of the few where I go into details in the notes.


This essay links many times to Wikipedia. Readers should be cautioned, however. I performed an experiment with a friend in 2008, and the results showed a rather pronounced imperial, Eurocentric bias. On controversial “fringe” subjects, particularly ones that threaten the global power structure, such as free energy suppression, Wikipedia can be worse than worthless (although that article has marginally improved over the years), with Wikipedia articles dominated by trolls, with some of them being professionals. I use Wikipedia with caution, and I suggest that the readers of this essay use similar caution. In several places at Wikipedia where this essay links to, I have seen errors and mainstream biases, which will likely always plague Wikipedia. In general, as I wrote this essay, the closer the story got to the human chapter of the story of life on Earth, the more “vandalism” was evident in the articles, where people promoted their pet theories. When the story finally started dealing with Homo sapiens, the vandalism was so great at times that I hesitated to link to the articles, as they were so badly marred. Readers should be aware of that bias, which is consistent with how the massacre article was distorted and vandalized. If this essay becomes popular, I will suggest that readers might think of donating to Wikipedia. I respect their goal, and the work of millions has made it a valuable resource, even with its obvious limitations.


See, for instance, Douglas Futuyma’s Evolution, pp. 13-14, or Stephen Marshak’s Essentials of Geology, pp. 6-7.

The tale of the Big Bang and the physics of stars and solar systems can be found in numerous places on the Internet. A brief summary of the Big Bang and its immediate aftermath can be found in A.C. Phillips’s The Physics of Stars, pp. 1-3, and a less technical account is in Mark Foster Mortimer’s Civilization’s Future, How Energy Defines and Constrains our Progress, pp. 5-8.

See also Edward O. Wilson’s Consilience, chapter 3.

Many examples can be provided, such as the initially ridiculed light bulb and powered flight, where demonstrations of those technologies were made in public, but mainstream scientists ignored the demonstrations as if they were never made. For a less famous example, the great linguist Joseph Greenberg ruffled many specialist feathers with his generalist synthesis for cataloging the world’s languages by seeking universal similarities. His generalist synthesis, while having errors in the details, is widely accepted today as largely accurate. See an account of the controversy in Nicholas Wade’s Before the Dawn, pp. 218-232. The taboo against studying mass extinctions prevailed for more than a century and was broken by a team led by a Nobel Laureate working outside of his field of expertise.

See, for instance, Frans B. M. de Wall and Pier Francesco Ferrari, eds., The Primate Mind, for a bottom-up approach, which is a departure from the top-down approaches. In that instance, the top-down approach compared non-human primates with humans, seeing how close their cognitive processes came to human processes. The bottom-up approach explored the foundations of non-human primate cognition, not how they compared to human cognition.

The inventors of the heat pump that my partner sold cut their published performance data in half so that engineers would not ridicule that “impossible” data. The microscopes of Royal Rife and Gaston Naessens are older than I am, and those microscopes attain optical resolutions considered “impossible” by today’s optical theory, some of which hails all the way back to Isaac Newton. When Naessens tried patenting his microscope, with its “impossible” optical resolutions, he was unable to explain its resolutions in terms of orthodox optical theory and had to abandon the patent process. Rife earlier invented a microscope that attained similar “impossible” resolutions, and while the medical establishment did its best to crush Rife’s work, surviving micrographs prove that it indeed attained such resolutions. Brown’s Gas has long been an enigma, with its exact composition unknown. It is made of the hydrogen and oxygen resulting from splitting water, but seems to be unusually bonded. The transmutation experiment with Brown’s Gas has been performed a hundred times or more, including by national governments, and orthodox theory cannot explain the results. While scientists were stumped over just exactly what Brown’s Gas was and how it produced “impossible” results, Yull Brown was not too interested in the theories; he was more interested in what Brown’s Gas could do. Sparky Sweet’s free energy device, which produced a million times the energy that went into it, and also produced antigravity effects, was baffling even to Sparky. He and his partner wrote a book to explain how it worked, but there was still plenty of mystery regarding how it worked. When Sparky demonstrated it to a close colleague, Sparky himself shrugged in amazement, saying that it indeed defied electric theory, but there it was, working. The free energy, antigravity, and other exotic technologies that were demonstrated to my friend blew his mind, and almost any scientist viewing that demonstration would have been stunned into bewilderment.

See David Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order, pp. 240-245, which refers to Bohm’s original calculation in his Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, p. 163. Bohm’s calculation is summarized as follows: “If one computes the amount of energy that would be in one cubic centimeter of space…it turns out to be very far beyond the total energy of all the matter in the known universe.” See discussion of Bohm’s theory and the evidence for it in Michael Talbot’s The Holographic Universe, pp. 51-55, and Bohm’s opinions on the relationship between consciousness and quantum phenomena in Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, pp. 213-215.

In Einstein’s “Sidelights on Relativity,” a speech delivered on May 5th, 1920, at the University of Leyden, Einstein finished with: “Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical properties; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether.”

See Jeane Manning and Joel Garbon’s Breakthrough Power, p. 123 for thirty of the names that Jeane has collected over the years for the field that is tapped by so-called free energy technology.

A recent example is Nassim Haramein’s “Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass”, Physical Review & Research International, volume 3, issue 4, October - December 2013, pp. 270-292, and related press release.

“Black projects” are efforts that the public is not officially aware of, engaged in by various “national security” organizations, some large “aerospace” companies and other private interests, many of whose names have never been publicly revealed.

The tales of Rife’s and Naessens’s microscopes are some of the best that I know of to demonstrate the literal blindness of establishment science. Naessens is still active in 2014, with his microscopes available to any scientist with the courage to look through the lens. If attaining such “impossible” resolutions were all that those microscopes did, that would be plenty, but those microscopes were the primary instruments used by their inventors to investigate life processes at greater resolutions than any electron microscope or other establishment microscope can attain. They both independently confirmed the general findings of one of Louis Pasteur’s contemporaries, Antoine Béchamp, whose research pointed to a very different dynamic of life processes than Pasteur’s germ theory, which may have been a poorly understood plagiarism of Béchamp’s work. The findings of those microscopes led to, among other things, cancer treatments that are harmless, cheap, and effective, but Morris Fishbein and the American Medical Association wiped Rife out, and Naessens has been treated similarly. They may have even discovered the boundary between inanimate matter and life, which exists in the sub-cellular milieu. That situation is one of the more stunning and public examples of vested economic interests suppressing scientific advances.

For instance, numerous psi experiments have produced highly consistent results over many years, such as Ganzfeld experiments, receiving information in dreams, and other tests, including influencing the decay rate of radioactive elements. Those thousands of experiments were also subjected to professional meta-analysis, with the experimental results demonstrating high correlation and the odds of them being chance results are less than one in trillions, and even smaller probabilities. See Dean Radin’s Entangled Minds, chapter six, and Chris Carter’s Science and Psychic Phenomena, pp. 60-104. Carter’s book and Robert McLuhan’s Randi’s Prize analyze the reactions of a politically active arm of the scientific establishment known as organized skepticism. After a scandal, when the leading “skeptical” organization tried performing original research and seemingly manipulated the data to conform to their conclusion (see Chris Carter’s Science and Psychic Phenomena, pp. 24-37, and here), they never performed original research again, but challenge experimental results that call into question the materialist assumptions of mainstream science. Their challenges are generally ad hoc hypotheses that often beg the question, with their objections becoming more logically strained over the years. My encounters with members of that organization were shocking, as they proved themselves to be deeply dishonest. For scientific investigations of paranormal phenomena, Randi’s Prize and Michael E. Flynn’s The Articulate Dead are good introductions to the kinds of findings that have been adduced.

See Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, pp. 237-255. See Nick Herbert’s Elemental Mind, pp. 140-162.

Regarding the foundation of physics, Einstein wrote: “Is it basic for physics that one assumes a real world existing independently from any act of perception – but this we do not know.” See Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, p, 166. See Rupert Sheldrake’s The Science Delusion for a discussion of the faith-based assumptions that gird mainstream science, which include: ever since the Big Bang, when everything came from nothing, all matter and energy has been at the same total amount; the so-called “laws” of nature are invariable; nature has no purpose, and evolution has no goal; all consciousness is an illusory and ephemeral byproduct of the operation of brains; all biological inheritance is material, there is no such thing as psychic phenomena – all evidence adduced so far for it is due to error, wishful thinking, and fraud; mechanistic medicine is the only kind that works. None of those assumptions has been subjected to falsification, and several cannot be falsified, which is the acid test of science. Also, there is a great deal of evidence that those assumptions may be false.

See Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, p, 101.

In Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, pp. 3-5, Rosenblum describes a visit to Einstein’s home in the 1950s, when Rosenblum was a graduate student in physics. Einstein wanted to discuss the implications of quantum theory. In Rosenblum’s quantum physics class, the professor skipped over that part of the book (which Einstein’s protégé David Bohm wrote), to get into the math. It was not until many years later that Rosenblum began to understand what Einstein was concerned about. Late in his life, Einstein “reproached” Heisenberg for the randomness introduced by quantum theory. Einstein was upset by the quantum theory’s creation of reality by the observer, which would theoretically make the entire universe subjective, not objective. But his greatest disquiet was reserved for the “spooky action at a distance,” now termed “quantum entanglement,” where separate objects instantly interact with each other, no matter how far apart they are.

See Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner’s Quantum Enigma, p, 186.

In The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Richard Feynman said, “It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is.” Werner Heisenberg voiced the same caution.

See, for instance, Johannes Wirz’s “Progress towards complementarity in genetics.” Also, molecular clock data, whose timing is based on an assumption of macro-predictable random mutations of DNA, has been shown to be inaccurate, and the early exuberance toward genetic science has been sobered by the reality. Scientists can see what mutated, but have had to become more modest on asserting when it happened. See Richard Cowen’s History of Life, pp. 221-223. See Rupert Sheldrake’s The Science Delusion, chapter 6.

Wade Frazier
13th May 2014, 15:40
Hi:

About to go do some chores. A lot of the editing is making links, both inside and outside the essay, often to other essays on my site, but not always. Again, the mass movement mentality is the one that I will need to guard against the most with people I try to recruit into the choir, and on that note, I updated the last point on my list of what has not worked.

Best,

Wade

12. Beseeching the world’s governments for assistance, particularly their military arms:

a. They are usually among those sending their agents to conferences;

b. They all answer, at some level, to the GCs, although few in those organizations are aware of the GCs in the slightest;

c. Washington D.C. activists often end up dead (1, 2, 3, 4), and others have “enjoyed” somewhat less dire fates (Brian and Dennis were run out of the USA for their efforts), but I have never heard of D.C. activism in these areas with a happy ending;

13. Beseeching corporate, environmental, charitable, scientific, or academic institutions:

a. They all have ideological commitments to their scarcity-based frames of reference, and they almost always view FE either as the enemy, or impossible because of the “laws of physics,” or they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” and they have other reactions of denial; they are the groups often most resistant the very idea of FE;

b. In summary, there are not any organizations not already devoted to FE that have allied with FE efforts or are likely to; those doors have been banged on thousands of times, and nobody is home; in the rare instance when the door opens and the beseecher is let in, it is usually to impede/eliminate them, not to help; I have never seen genuine help given.

Wade Frazier
13th May 2014, 15:56
Hi:

And one more tweaked:

7. Mounting a mass movement, especially around ideologies such as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion:

a. Those ideologies are seated in scarcity-based, self-serving, and fearful assumptions, and the GCs have masterfully used those ideologies to control the masses; out-herding the master shepherd with his own tools is very unlikely;

b. Because all such ideologies cater to self-interest, the effort attracts those of corrupt motivation from the outset and are easily defeated by organized suppression, if they do not internally collapse before then;

c. Scarcity-based ideologies, and efforts with allegiance to them, are old skins that will not hold the new wine;

d. Members of the general public are usually only interested in FE if they can immediately profit from it, such as have it delivered to their homes for free, or FE presents a business opportunity, and the like, and their self-serving and usually scientifically illiterate orientation is easily distracted; they are often more harm than help, and are easily seduced/dissuaded by the agents of organized suppression; the naïve, idly curious, and others are little or no help at this stage;

Off and running,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
13th May 2014, 18:31
Hi,


The Orthodox Framework and its Limitations (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=833964&viewfull=1#post833964) part of the essay is one of my personal favorites :). It has helped me greatly understand what the scientific ideal is, what a theory is and why it is important that it's falsifiable. It also appeals to the "rebel" side of me, by looking and the dogmatic view of "White science" as well as the so called "skeptics".

For an indepth analysis of these concepts I cannot recommend enough Chris's Carters books :)

Wade Frazier
13th May 2014, 19:34
Hi Ilie:

Yes, that is a pretty important part of the essay, as I try to weave between orthodoxy and the fringes. Many fringe hypotheses and theories either are not falsifiable, their proponents stress “hits,” where data conforms to the hypotheses, or they outright ignore or misrepresent data that falsifies them.

Have a remote viewing:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#brown

and materialism is falsified, which the mainstream cannot seem to deal with. Chris Carter’s stuff is pretty good, and points, like McLuhan’s book:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=787774&viewfull=1#post787774

and others do, to the great amount of scientific investigation that has been performed on paranormal phenomena. But direct personal experience is where knowledge comes from. Brian O was a big advocate of scientific testing of paranormal phenomena, but I am in a battle with Wikipedia’s “editors” who call his approach “beliefs”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_O%27Leary#Alternative_beliefs

when it was nothing of the sort, in another example of where the mainstream does not play fair. As I looked at the Wikipedia bio while writing this, I noted that they removed the new energy part of the bio’s introduction, but they also took out the moon landing hoax section. Yeah! I had been looking for help so that I could publish Brian’s final word on the issue:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#statement

to counter the conspiracist stuff. We’ll see how long before the conspiracists and others try to add that section back. All in all, I can’t complain too much about how Brian’s bio looks right now, other than that “beliefs” part.

As I get near to finishing the essay’s first draft, I am beginning to think more about what I will be doing after the essay is published, and I go about trying to build that choir. I will have a page devoted to the issue, and I can see it along the lines of what I will be looking for, which goes something like this…

I am looking for:

1. Those who publicly write about some of the essay’s issues in a way that evidences not only their familiarity with the material, but also the level of their comprehensive awareness;

2. People who have attained some understanding of what a world based on abundance looks like, and who have realized that the means become the ends.

3. Who will write publicly, using their own names. Scholarly efforts will impress me the most, but that is not a requirement; intelligent, heartfelt, honest, thoughtful, and informed writings are what I seek; ideally, we can all learn from each other.

I am not looking for:

A. Mastery of the essay’s material; I have not mastered it myself, but I am looking for people who are genuinely trying to;

B. People who want to use my work to begin some kind of mass movement, something they can proselytize with, as they try to recruit those in their social circles into the effort I am mounting (I realize that the need to do some of that is normal, but those I seek will also realize how hopeless such activities are for my message; if you really understand my work, it is almost certain that nobody else in your social circles will, or will even want to, including family members and colleagues);

C. People who want to use my work to reach out to environmental, corporate, charitable, governmental, academic, religious, and other institutions; none are amenable to a message like mine, which has been discovered by my travelers and me through thousands of interactions with such organizations; I am trying to create my own organization, but it will look almost nothing like anything that is established today.


Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
13th May 2014, 21:18
As I wind down the essay, I joined the fray on Brian’s bio:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_O%27Leary#The_Frontiers_of_Science

We will see how long “The Frontiers of Science” lasts. There is more work to do on the bio, but there are no more areas of his bio where I think I am in for a fight.

Nine
14th May 2014, 04:33
Dearest wade...

I see Godzilla in action in the latest psyopps upon the bundy ranch deal and of course Benghazi...

I am sick of the internet and the blogosphere and they should shut it off...

Folks would quickly return to a local reality....

Trouble is that we have so so many folks caught up in fighting said gubbernment and of course their psyopps is so skilled and advanced...

The internet will never be shut off because it is so effective in doing the bidding of Godzilla and his agents.....

The total bull**** is astounding to me and shutting it off would be a blessing.....as it were...

Well wade....I will keep reading your stuff and maybe there might be a peaceful answer ...however....I am not hopeful for such....

Nine

Wade Frazier
14th May 2014, 05:58
Hi Nine:

I hear you on how hopeless it can seem. But I have watched and been a part of miracles, and I do not believe that the Big Boys are in charge like they think they are. The pursuit of love and the truth are worthy goals in of themselves, and they have always been my shield. Even if a path of love and truth does not get there, it is the only path that I have any interest in. And I think it might work…

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
15th May 2014, 22:28
Hi:

I have written it many times on this thread and on my site:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#conspiracism

and I am reminded almost daily how hard it will be for people to understand. They will not understand while they think like victims, where they either obsess about Godzilla or deny his existence. There are very few people on Earth who have genuinely encountered Godzilla and speak publicly about it. Those few in my circle and myself are some of the few that I know of. Many have encountered local or national level activities, and think they met Godzilla. Godzilla does not bother with those levels, and only people who threaten to upend the global rackets get to have the Eye of Sauron focused on them, and the orcs sicced on them. Godzilla stepped on me, and it hurt, but I also became a thorn in his foot that was not easy to dislodge. Dennis has given Godzilla some interesting days in the office. I don’t need people informing me about Godzilla, and most who claim insider knowledge are purveying disinformation, either unwittingly or knowingly.

My work is not Godzilla-centric, but I am constantly approached by conspiracists and related enthusiasts who want to tell me all about Godzilla and his activities, or who prefer pretending that he does not exist. Both approaches are off-the-mark. My work acknowledges Godzilla and his influence, and leaves the subject behind for far more important matters, but about 99.99% of the population cannot get beyond either denying Godzilla’s existence or obsessing about him. They have to grow their awareness past those hurdles if they are going to become productive members of what I will be attempting. It usually means getting out of the victim’s mindset and beginning to think like a creator.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Nine
16th May 2014, 06:14
Hi:

I have written it many times on this thread and on my site:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#conspiracism

and I am reminded almost daily how hard it will be for people to understand. They will not understand while they think like victims, where they either obsess about Godzilla or deny his existence. There are very few people on Earth who have genuinely encountered Godzilla and speak publicly about it. Those few in my circle and myself are some of the few that I know of. Many have encountered local or national level activities, and think they met Godzilla. Godzilla does not bother with those levels, and only people who threaten to upend the global rackets get to have the Eye of Sauron focused on them, and the orcs sicced on them. Godzilla stepped on me, and it hurt, but I also became a thorn in his foot that was not easy to dislodge. Dennis has given Godzilla some interesting days in the office. I don’t need people informing me about Godzilla, and most who claim insider knowledge are purveying disinformation, either unwittingly or knowingly.

My work is not Godzilla-centric, but I am constantly approached by conspiracists and related enthusiasts who want to tell me all about Godzilla and his activities, or who prefer pretending that he does not exist. Both approaches are off-the-mark. My work acknowledges Godzilla and his influence, and leaves the subject behind for far more important matters, but about 99.99% of the population cannot get beyond either denying Godzilla’s existence or obsessing about him. They have to grow their awareness past those hurdles if they are going to become productive members of what I will be attempting. It usually means getting out of the victim’s mindset and beginning to think like a creator.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Dearest wade,

Thank you for your kind words to me...however this post is reality.....thank you for posting such thoughts....

Godzilla-centric....that is a good one....like on the "infowar" or that "CONstitution" which triggers all of those "patriotic" sentiments for all of us to go to war...ha...ha...

So that is the purpose of the alternative media? To get many to obsess on Godzilla and the corporate media keeps them dumbed down....got to hand it to them....he...he...

Clever.....so free energy is about truth and love and most importantly integrity?

So, the internet is a limited hang out operation....as it were.... keeping the eye off of more important matters....

I thank you for the prod to look at things in another way.....

Nine

Nine
16th May 2014, 06:42
Wade,

"All alternative cancer treatments, which almost universally abandon the attack-the-tumor paradigm, have been subjected to breathtaking suppression by organized medicine. A structural analysis reveals how a handful of people at the leading biomedical institutions are largely responsible for branding anything not attacking the tumor as quackery, while the conspiratorial view acknowledges those same elite activities, but credits more conscious realms of manipulation and control. In the end, there is little difference between their perspectives. "

In the end there is the truth with different perspectives on the truth of a matter but both are in essence correct.....

Quite mind blowing....as it were...when you really ponder all of this....

Nine

Wade Frazier
16th May 2014, 14:17
Hi Nine:

It took me about twenty years to figure out what I was seeing. I began my journey with almost no knowledge of Godzilla. I had heard some stories of energy inventors having their technologies seized, after being made an “offer,” before I met Dennis. I think that the “make your funeral plans” statement was not told me by Mr. Mentor:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#introduction

until I brought Dennis to Ventura, but it might have been a few years earlier. I became aware of high-MPG carburetor suppression before I met Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#carb1

And I already knew how inventors usually had their inventions stolen. So, I was not completely in the grip of naïveté when that voice in my head led me to Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice2

But my days with Dennis were when I began waking up fast. His company was being disemboweled by the local electric interests:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

and I watched attacks from all sides, including one who I now know was one of Godzilla’s assets:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

but who was just a contract agent, like the provocateur who was sicced on us in Ventura:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#texas

I came to understand that the problem was not so much the plays they made, but how easily they got people to do their bidding to betray us. When I saw it happen in Ventura, I initially could not believe what I was seeing:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#salient3

By that time, I had witnessed at least a dozen attempts to steal our companies, by our “allies,” and before the raid, I told Dennis how shocking it was to see, and he told me to join the club:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#shocked

By the time the dust settled in Ventura, I got the message, very loud and clear, that the enemy is us:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

Godzilla barely had to lift a claw most of the time. Dennis is amazing in his ability to get kicked in the teeth and keep on going, so Godzilla had to come out of hiding a time or two, and directly intervene:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

and we also heard from the White Hats in those days:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#white

It would take me weeks to begin to relate all the lessons that I learned in those radicalizing days. In the end, I saw that the enemy was us, and we did most of Godzilla’s work for him. I also realized that Godzilla does not have a monopoly on organized suppression, and I saw activities against us launched from the local and state level, with no nudging from Godzilla required, as local interests protected their turfs. What was kind of “funny” about Dennis’s journey was that the federal government was very fractured regarding our efforts. Dennis has engaged in D.C. activism many times, like Brian O did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#after

On one hand, a federal agency hired Bill the Hit Man:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

but on the other, the Justice Department investigated Dennis and said that he was “squeaky clean”:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#squeaky

Bill Clinton hated Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#yull

while the Bush administration invited Dennis to demonstrate his stuff in D.C.:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#midlife

After they canceled the demo and Dennis persisted, soon after he was contacted by one of the biggest names that conspiracy theorists obsess over, the feds finally lowered the boom on Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#ftc

and that time, they ran him out of the country, finally ending his threat in the USA, once and for all. Brian O was run out of the USA, too:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#portland

while Godzilla used the CIA as one of his errand boys:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

and was likely pulling at least some of the strings behind what happened in Ventura:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#mr

Most of what happened was probably just letting “nature” take its course, as the system is inherently evil:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#care

So, I saw that Godzilla rarely needed to act, as local interests and our “allies” would do almost all of his work for him, but when things began to get out of hand and it looked like we might succeed, then Godzilla finally got out of his easy chair.

As we were being attacked by what was certainly an international conspiracy, and people came to us in a stream, telling us their tales of woe:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#car

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#platinum

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#windmill

I began waking up very rapidly, but again, what amazed me was not that such evil forces were at work, but how eagerly everybody did their bidding, even people close to me. When I found a “real job” in LA, about when Dennis was thrown into solitary confinement for trying to throw a Christmas party for his inmates:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#solitary

right after I started there, the feds tried to wipe out that company:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#experience

with the state and local media involved with the snuff job. It felt very familiar.

After I staggered from Ventura in 1990, and began trying to figure it all out:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#books

it was not long before I was reaching out to people like Noam Chomsky:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lies.htm#chomsky

and befriended people like Ralph McGehee:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#introduction

and I got to see the “left” in action. They had a more structural view of how the world worked. It was more sophisticated than the conspiracist view, and likely more accurate in many ways. My first real exposure to alternative political material was conspiracist stuff during my days in Ventura with Dennis. They tended to obsess on the organized suppression. While it got so bad that Ralph was afraid to leave his house:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#protection

in general, the left denied that organized suppression was real, as they focused on the situation’s structural aspects. Chomsky went so far as to write a book on why the CIA would not have been involved in the JFK assassination, which got Mike Parenti darting into the fray:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#parenti

I am only hitting some of the highlights from thousands of interactions that I had with people on these issues. On organized suppression, the conspiracists tended to focus obsessively on the conspiratorial (conscious) aspects, while the structuralists focused on the unconscious aspects, but both camps denied that the main problem was the public and its abysmally-low level of personal integrity:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#weakness

Both camps tended to blame the elites, either with their conscious, “conspiratorial” activity, or just how they operated the machinery of society’s institutions, where the outcomes were just encouraged by the very structure of the organizations. One of Chomsky’s sayings was that all corporations going for profit above all else is no “conspiracy,” but just how corporations are structured. But the “left” almost always denied that GM would take their profit-seeking activities into realms where they engaged in organized suppression. That was one of the hardest things for me to understand, and it was not until about 2006, when I had several interactions with one of the founders of the free software movement:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/freesoft.htm

and watched his wall of denial at work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#circular

that I clearly saw the paradigm that they operate under. The guy was a genius, but he was highly defended against reality. I had seen many, many instances of it, but it was not until then that it really sank in, to where I clearly saw their paradigm. I call them Level 3s:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

Again, I could write on this subject for weeks and still just scratch the surface of what I learned over the years, from the Peak Oilers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm

to the far right, to the far left, to scientists, to FE activists, to sitting American presidents, and, yes, to Godzilla. But it really is simplistic and naïve to chalk it all up to him, and people have to get way past Godzilla, both the denial of his existence, or obsessing about him, to reach productive understandings of the issue. Godzilla is very real, and when he steps on you, it hurts, if you survive the experience, but he is merely the apex predators in a jungle filled with T-Rexes, velociraptors, and the sheeple that they feed on, where the sheeple either deny those predators exist, or they do their bidding and waltz right into Godzilla’s lair, expecting to win a prize, like in that Aesop’s fable:

http://www.serendipity.li/fe/minefields.htm

When people finally get past denial of Godzilla, they immediately think how they can sneak past him. It is a juvenile fantasy, but I hear that one more than any other, for those who get past denial. And there are many variations of that reaction. Highly deluded Young Warriors:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#warriors

think that they can go find Godzilla and defeat him in battle. They are the scariest people to be around, partly because when it comes time to use their weaponry, they would shoot us in the back instead of aim at Godzilla. In the end, my spiritual training, long before I met Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#my

helped prepare me for my adventures, and one of the key lessons that I began with is still the star I steer by: the means become the ends:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/visions.htm#idealist

That was the lesson that almost nobody learned, as they virtually all failed the integrity tests:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

So, that is all a long way of saying that it took nearly forty years, of trial and error, of playing on the high road, being chewed on from almost all sides, with the most painful chewing inflicted by my friends, family, and colleagues, not Godzilla’s minions, to come to the awareness that I have today. That was the hard lesson of my journey, and when I traded notes with my few fellow travelers, we all essentially learned the same lessons. It is not exactly a fun “club” to be in, but we got to learn how the world really works. FE efforts cannot be Godzilla-centric, inventor-centric, money-centric, New-Age-centric, and the like, if they want to have a prayer of success. If they cater to scarcity-based ideologies:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

they are doomed from the outset, as those in the effort have already donned the reins that the social managers are already adept at using. Those scarcity-based ideologies only appeal to the semi-sentient, and they will not work for making FE happen. That is one of the hardest-won fruits of my journey, but almost nobody really wants to hear it, because they are semi-sentient themselves, still in thrall to their conditioning. That is why I repeatedly say that people have to have some kind of awakening experience to begin to take the path of learning that I offer:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#developing

Otherwise, they cannot leave behind the security blankets of their conditioning, thinking that they are protecting them, not enslaving them. Once they let go of one of those teddy bears, they can begin to see how all of those teddy bears are traps for their consciousness, preventing the manifestation of true sentience. The teddy bears of mainstream science:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#subtle

are the most subtle and insidious, and after banging his head on the walls of establishment science for several years, Brian O wondered if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

and I understood his query. My reply is that humanity is currently semi-sentient, and it is being actively kept in that state by using the carrots and sticks of scarcity-based conditioning. Those in thrall to that conditioning have yet to achieve true sentience. That “I am the messiah” shtick is just one of many pitfalls that await the newcomer:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

Helping people achieve true sentience has been the point of my work probably since 1990, but it was a long, fitful road to travel, to get to where I could write the essay that I am working on. And I know that there is almost nobody on Earth who even wants to become sentient, as they abdicated their sentience for the promise of security. I know that I am looking for needles in haystacks, but this new tool, the Internet, can help me find them.

We will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
16th May 2014, 20:28
Hi:

I am doing chores, helped a friend move his household this morning, and am back to editing the essay. Part of me knows that I am doomed to constantly relive my journey, as newbies constantly ask about it, come up with “bright ideas” that reflect their inexperience, and for other reasons. When I get the essay published and start my own forum, I hope that dies down. If it does not, then I am doing something wrong. I provide a great deal of information and documentation, as well as where to go find more, so that the people that I really want to interact with can do the work, and I am not constantly having to deal with square one questions/observations/“bright ideas,” and can begin to take the conversation to levels that will be needed for that choir to begin to form.

One thought that was going through my mind as I helped my friend move is the issue of money and FE. It was always a central concern, and Dennis’s program of putting his heat pump on people’s homes for free is the most brilliant thing I ever saw him do:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#sfs

but almost everybody around him was oblivious to it. Every time he had his companies stolen, the first thing that the thieves did was get rid of Dennis’s “crazy” marketing plans, while they went for the capitalistic quick kill. Of course, none of them every did anything productive, but it is hard to say if they were really that stupid, were provocateurs, or had no intention of doing anything other than gutting carcass of the company they stole.

Probably the number one lie I saw told about Dennis was around money, too, where people alleged that Dennis somehow stole millions of dollars from his companies, squirrelling it away someplace. I repeatedly saw it in Seattle and Ventura, and everybody who made that claim was charged with taking the company out, either as a “public servant”

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#pinch

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#faces

an outright provocateur:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm#global

(Mr. Texas also did it, as he was literally stealing Dennis’s company http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#texas )

or some leading voice in the FE field, one of which even Limor has cited for his astute observations:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825706&viewfull=1#post825706

When the feds came after Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#ftc

I heard the same crap. That is one of those situations where a chorus of lies, from all directions, is somehow supposed to morph into the truth. I have no illusions about the kinds of attacks that will be coming my way when I begin to really take this work public and start that forum, but the plan is to cloister the conversation away from all that crap and learn to sing. I regularly hear from people trying to chat up my work to their friends, families, and colleagues, and when I was a lot younger, I foolishly engaged the people that my allies drug into the conversation. What an immense waste of time and effort that was. I watched friendships end. All the things that I will be avoiding and kicking out of the conversation are not things that I just have a visceral aversion to, but are things that wasted my time, put people in danger, wrecked their lives, wrecked their relationships, and the like. Newbies who just have to rush out on that battlefield, to get a taste of it, I will likely invite out of my effort ASAP. I plan to never invite people in who suffer from those newbie delusions, and that may be one of the hardest parts of what I will do, as people try to drag others to the party. It will not be that kind of effort.

So, I will not be asking anybody for any money. That is one way to avoid the kinds of attacks that not only come from within the “field,” but is also the quickest way to go to jail. As I saw with Dennis in Seattle, putting it on people’s homes for free was still not good enough, as the officials there to this day lie about what happened. How the heck do you steal millions when you put it on their homes for free? How stupid do they think the public is? Well, apparently pretty stupid, and the public largely obliged them, and those gangsters are still active where I live, and “pillars” of the community. So, I have several reasons for not ever asking for any money.

I am asking for something far more valuable, which is sentience. Almost nobody on Earth has ever attained anything close to it, but that is what I will be asking of people, that they at least try. Becoming aware of how the world really works is not easy. Most do not want to know, as it frightens them. Letting go of our conditioning is not easy. But on the other side of letting go is the chance to really become a sentient being, not a creature that seeks the safety of the herd, trading sentience for security. I know it will not be easy for people to give up their security blankets. Heck, Dennis still plays the religion game, and I am about the only American FE activist who does not drink the red-white-and-blue-flavored Kool-Aid. But it is the path I am trying out, and we will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
17th May 2014, 15:12
Hi:

The process of writing at Avalon and getting feedback from readers has also been grist for the mill of writing the essay. Again, by 1988, the primary lesson of my journey had been pounded into my head in no uncertain terms:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

and I had great doubts about the businessman’s/inventor’s approach to FE. Dennis took his mass movement ideas to greater levels in subsequent years, barnstorming the country, running national ad campaigns, and so forth. When he finally coaxed me into joining him again, in 1996, I really did not believe in the approach, and I really did not fit with what he was doing and left not long before the roof caved in, and I did not realize for more than a decade that I was risking prison back then:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/other.htm#sting

I then embarked on creating what became my website today:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#midlife

and I let Brian coax me into another mass movement effort:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#nem

I will never be involved with such approaches again, but I am constantly besieged with news of the latest inventor of the hour, the latest FE inventor who thinks he is the messiah, the latest attempt to start a stampede, and so on.

If I had to guess, I began the path toward writing the upcoming essay immediately after I published my site in late 2002 and was introduced to Bucky’s work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

But I had to wrestle with a monster of a midlife crisis for the next several years, which did not begin to end until Dennis tried to get me involved with him once again:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#midlife

The clouds began to part in late 2006, and was when I began taking the steps in earnest that led to writing the upcoming essay and trying out my new approach. Doing interviews probably helped establish my path, and Bill and Kerry’s interview:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm

was probably the most significant one on that score. It led me to Ilie, Dennis (the Avalon Dennis), Scott, and many others. So, the path has been anything but a straight one, and only crazed persistence has seen me get to where I am today, and time will tell if it makes a dent or not. If I did not think that it could, then I would not be trying it.

I am close to finishing my first round of editing, before I let my pals have at it, for an editorial process that will likely last a couple months. Below is my revised finale of the essay.

Best,

Wade

A great potential pitfall is judging the 99.9+% of humanity that cannot or will refuse to comprehend my message, and it is almost always their victim-oriented mindset that is their barrier to comprehension. People cannot be talked out of thinking like victims; only experience can shatter their paradigm. Brian’s question regarding whether humanity is a sentient species is fair. I call humanity semi-sentient; the potential for sentience is there, but is rarely realized, as people traded their sentience for the promise of security in a world of scarcity.

For each epochal event (1, 2, 3, 4), nobody could imagine the event before it happened. Every event was a new method that tapped a level of energy that was an order of magnitude greater than the previous energy regime, and the world that it led to was unimaginable to those living immediately before the event. Berating and judging almost the entirety of humanity because they cannot imagine a world based on FE would be like judging those australopiths before their “Tesla” invented the first stone tool. Were all of those pre-stone-tool australopiths “stupid,” or was that Australo-Tesla brilliant? For each epochal event, the trends that led to the event, where one pioneer, or a relative handful of them, was able to achieve the social organization and technological prowess to tap the previously unexploited energy source, were evident in hindsight. Although those achieving the feat were extraordinary for their time, they stood on the shoulders of their ancestors and enjoyed the benefits of the culture that allowed their invention to appear. Those many arguments of denial that attend the introduction of the FE concept are normal, just like pre-fire protohumans reacting to the idea of a campfire with fear. Not until those protohumans could see a tended fire with their own eyes could they begin to comprehend it and its self-evident benefits. Those who invented the new way were extraordinary for their time, not that those who could not see or imagine it were irredeemably stupid; they were simply trapped in the prevailing paradigm. When the new energy regime appeared, everybody climbed aboard and their burgeoning sentience reached new levels, and they soon lived in a world that was previously unimaginable to everybody, even the inventor(s).

We are simply living in the pre-epochal-event stage, and are right at its brink. This time is different, however, in that the technical achievements have already been made, but those running the planet are actively preventing the epochal event from manifesting. They live in fear, just like virtually all humans do. They see their role in the world disappearing when FE makes its appearance, and are doing what they can to prevent it, just like virtually all humans would. What makes this event different is also the fact that with each epochal event the ecosystems were further pushed to the brink, as a side-effect of the energy regime, and humanity has been causing the Sixth Mass Extinction ever since that founder group left Africa. That trend is quickly reaching levels that threaten all complex life on Earth, including humanity. I sympathize with the dismay that awakening people can have toward the unawakened, who do not care what the future holds and are only interested in pursuing their immediate self-interest and surviving in a world of scarcity. They are largely impediments to FE manifesting, not allies, but they comprise nearly 100% of humanity today. It is simply how humanity has been for all time, although many like to pretend otherwise. As Machiavelli noted, people will not begin to awaken until FE becomes a part of their lives, and nobody but the founders will awaken to the new energy regime until they can experience it. I seek founders: those extraordinary people who can imagine the new energy regime before they can experience it. I do not seek to persuade those who deny FE with their many arguments, think it dangerous beyond all reason, believe that the situation is hopeless, or are stuck in the FE field’s current state of arrested development. The people I seek are needles in haystacks, but this new technology called the Internet can help me find and train them. The transition from a world based on scarcity and fear, to one of abundance and love, which is the greatest one that humanity will ever make, initially needs people who can just imagine that world, keep their attention on it, and refuse to be distracted, while infinite distractions beckon. The Fifth Epochal Event will likely not be humanity’s final such event, but it will transform human civilization in ways that nobody today can really fathom, even though there have been many hints of what that could look like (1, 2), which is an advantage that no previous epochal event had going for it.

Those people trying out all the doomed approaches to manifesting FE are to be commended, but they do not have a chance in today’s world. A new approach is needed, and one that is aligned with the kind of world that it can help manifest. The effort needs to aim high. Concepts such as open-sourcing and crowdfunding have come from the Internet culture, and are steps in the right direction. Even high-tech potentates such as Bill Gates live relatively humbly. The Internet is a precursor to the kind of communication system that will be enjoyed in the Fifth Epochal Phase of the human journey, and I plan to use it for this new approach of manifesting FE. When love and abundance reign instead of fear and scarcity, the human journey will radically transform in ways that are currently unimaginable, where a creator’s orientation toward life will replace the victim’s orientation. Making that future at least partly imaginable has become my life’s work, and time will tell if it helps move the needle or not. As the great Bucky Fuller said, we are facing utopia or oblivion. Which one will we choose?

Wade Frazier
18th May 2014, 14:39
Hi:

Well, I distributed the first draft of my essay to my pals, and they are starting to beat on it. I hope to have the essay published before August. Most of the next two months, writing-wise, will likely be spent revising some of my site’s essays, generally the older ones. I also plan to resume my career. We will see how much I post at Avalon in the coming months, but if history is any indication, it will be a bit. :)

While I am not trying to offend anybody with my essay, many will feel that their ideological oxen got gored, and that is OK with me. I do not seek the 99+% of the public that will not understand my message or choose to be offended, but the less than 1%, perhaps far less, who will understand and go deep on the material.

I am not trying to wake up the masses with my writings, but reach the awakened and awakening. Only FE will wake up the masses (or something like the ETs landing on the White House lawn), and that is part of the conundrum.

Time for overdue chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
19th May 2014, 16:02
Hi:

Somebody just reminded me that I published the first draft of my essay when the movie Godzilla came out. I did not plan it that way! :)

Wade

Dennis Leahy
19th May 2014, 18:04
A huge cyber-hug to you, Wade, for your unwavering and immense compassion for humanity, non-human life, and Gaia, and for your perseverance, diligence, intelligence, and ability to assimilate and analyze so much diverse information into this incredible work. If the Choir is successful (and I believe, trust, and hope it will be), that will make this "essay" [hey, it's a book!] quite possibly the most important book ever written.

An honor to know you, brother.

Dennis

Wade Frazier
19th May 2014, 21:15
Dennis, you are a shameless flatterer. Shameless! :)

Seriously, thanks Bro. IMO, the subject matter of the essay is the most important one on Earth. If I have done the subject justice, and whether what I am attempting will make a dent, remains to be seen. My contribution is unique, but we will see if it is effective. :)

Now that the heavy lifting is finished, here are some reflections on the process and related matters. The magnitude of the issue is the greatest on Earth, hence Godzilla’s involvement, the frenzies of greed, the “I am the messiah” delusions, and the like. Almost nobody has a lukewarm reaction to the subject, as FE means the end of the world as we know it. This year marks the fortieth anniversary of my initial dreams of changing the energy industry:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#introduction

and if you had told me what I was in for, I would not have believed you. And if I had any idea what I was really in for, I might have sung Brian O’s tune of, “If I had known what I was in for, I would have never tried to make a difference.” He was half-joking. I cannot regret any step of my journey (and neither did Brian), but I do not want to revisit that territory again, and it is a big reason why I did my essay.

My journey has been a lesson in patience and learning to let go of expectations of the outcome, even while working toward a goal that is the biggest event in the human journey. Watching how Dennis handled it was an educational, if awe-inspiring, experience.

As I have been getting to the end, I have had pals try to drag what I am doing in all sorts of naïve and unproductive directions, or wondering what the heck I think I am trying out, and so on. And these are coming from my allies, mind you, people who know my heart, are in my corner, have known me for many years, and even they really have almost no idea what I am trying to do. Part of me is OK with that, because maybe Godzilla sees it that way, too, and will only watch, thinking that it is one more foolish waste of time.

I have been in conversations in just the past few days/weeks on the issue of all the people who approach me, always looking to somehow use me for their agenda, and they all waste my time and effort, or worse, end up damaging people, including themselves. That has been an almost universal situation, and my plans with that essay, future forum work, and other activities, are designed to keep the time-wasters away from what I am doing, as well as the naïve, predators, opportunists, and the like. Like I have stated many times, I am looking for needles in haystacks. I have people around me wanting to turn my stuff into TV shows, movies, and the like, trying to get some kind of Level 10 stampede going, who simply do not understand and are likely to never understand, unless FE is delivered to their homes.

The essay is going to be like a pre-requisite for entering a curriculum, similar to college. Studying the material will not be enough, however. The student must also evidence comprehension of the material. Nobody will be asked to be involved in the choir unless they are at level 12 or close:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level12

and are trying real hard to get there. One universal issue with FE is that nearly all newcomers I ever encountered thought that they had some bright idea that nobody ever tried before (like sneak past Godzilla! :) ), and that if we all just listened to them, making FE happen would be easy. That is the ego talking, with all of those boy-and-girl generals who have never sniffed the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

thinking that they were Audie Murphy. Those kinds of reactions are why the entire FE field is in a state of arrested development. Ideas like open-sourcing and crowdfunding, from the Internet culture, are steps in the right direction, but they are baby steps. Any effort that will have any measure of success will have to aim high, and lowest-common-denominator approaches (Level 10 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10) have never come close to working and are unlikely to.

Dealing with conspiracists and fringe people has always proven to be a mixed bag. To their credit, they often understand something about organized suppression, but tend to fixate on it, which leads to all manner of unproductive awareness and useless activities. It is really a small part of the problem. Fringe enthusiasts rarely separate the wheat from the chaff and disappear down many rabbit holes, where even if the rabbit hole led somewhere valid, it still would make very little difference in solving the immense problems that humanity faces, with running out of the energy that powers civilization being the biggest one.

One might say that my work is like Marx’s, in that it ultimately is about being a guide for action, but Marx worked when the science of energy was in its infancy, and Marx was full of Young Warrior delusions, with an angry, conspiratorial, coercive approach. Mine is the lamb’s approach.

Brian O may have said it best when he said that the only hope for FE to make it past humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression was combined positive intention. Brian was big on trying to sober up people who thought that some revolution of garage tinkerers could bring FE to the world. The gulf between something even as spectacular as what Sparky Sweet had:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

and public use was still $100 million or so of development. Even though the heavy lifting of writing my essay is finished, I will be adding odds and ends, and to that idea of the gulf between prototypes and public use, I just dug up Brian’s books and just added this note to the essay:

“Brian O’Leary discussed that gulf in his books, and put a price tag of at least $100 million to develop a production-ready FE device from a working prototype. See his Re-Inheriting the Earth, pp. 76-78, 286-288, and his Miracle in the Void, p. 251. Others such as Tom Bearden have made similar estimates. My guess is about $200 million today.”

As I skimmed through Brian’s books just now, looking for those sections, it hit me, once again, how brilliant Brian’s work was. He was always the closest to my perspective, and what an honor it was to carry his spears.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th May 2014, 03:03
Hi:

A little more on the essay… It is not some kind of paean to fringe stuff, nor is it an exercise in orthodoxy. There is plenty of both in it. I began my journey being trained to become a scientist, and a mystical awakening, existential crisis, and voice in my head led me from science to business. Eight largely frustrating and unhappy years later, I prayed for guidance a second time and was led to Dennis. It is what happened, and I will not soft-peddle the facts to cater to people’s sense of reality. Similar, if less spectacular, events have attended the journeys of my fellow travelers; they just come with the territory.

That said, most fringe stuff that I have looked into was not valid, and while I mention some of it in the essay, I pretty much stay with orthodoxy for most of the essay. Well, at least orthodox facts, even if orthodoxy does not always put them together like I do. I venture some of my own opinions on scientific controversies, but I do not do it often.

I have many pals from the fringes, and they have been getting their oxen gored by the essay. For instance, I do not challenge the idea of evolution, as many from the fringes have done. The issue of consciousness is central, and mainstream science generally ignores it, but Darwin’s idea of descent with modification leading to all life on Earth today is pretty much unassailable, IMO, after spending years looking into the issue. Maybe ETs or “God” intervened somewhere along the way, but I have not seen any place where their interventions were necessary or needed to explain what happened (except maybe for the first life).

Catastrophists also will be disappointed in the essay, as I clearly show that I am not in their camp. There have been plenty of catastrophes, some sudden, like the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs, and all mass extinctions were catastrophes, in one sense or another. However, the idea of recent catastrophes that were reflected in the Bible and other ancient texts, or catastrophists trying to explain the megafauna extinctions with celestial or geophysical catastrophes, are not explanations that I can get with. The evidence for those is quite thin, and people caused the megafauna extinctions, not natural catastrophes or climate change. There are whole cottage industries that try to deflect human responsibility for that catastrophe, but people did it, I am afraid.

But I point out many of orthodoxy’s failings, in science, in history, and the like. My essay is going to be treated by various camps like Brian O’s position on the moon landings:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#statement

where when he showed where he was not “one of them,” nobody liked it from either camp. People in ideological camps are not going to like my work, and that is OK, because I do not cater to any camps, and am trying to build my own, but not an ideological one. :)

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th May 2014, 14:14
Hi:

My essay is largely aimed at non-scientists, and is partly intended to help the reader understand the scientific process. There are warts aplenty in how it is practiced, but there is also an ideal that it aspires to, just like with all human endeavors. Science is based on doubt instead of faith, and that is its primary departure from organized religion, for instance. For much of the scientific parts of the essay, I not only cite the latest hypotheses and findings, but also direct readers to challenges to the hypotheses and data, to give the reader a flavor of the range of arguments and data. It can help people understand the process of science. That is for White Science, however. Black Science is another matter entirely, operating in the classified world, and way up in that world, Godzilla sits.

What is called Gray Science consists of self-published scientific papers that are not peer-reviewed, people working in private labs, in their garages, and the like, some of whom are professional scientists, while others are not. FE inventors largely work in the Gray Science area. There are a few reasons for that. If they really have something valid and important, then Godzilla’s minions arrive and the stuff goes black, either from being seized outright, the inventor dons the Golden Handcuffs, and the like. Sometimes it gets violent, but far less often than it used to.

White Scientists usually stay away from Gray Science, and I have seen them deny that Black Science even exists, and those who do that are either naïve or work on behalf of Black Science as disinformation specialists.

I give a nod to all three kinds of science, and they all have their virtues and pitfalls. White Scientists tend to be naïve and dogmatic, but their results can be subjected to being reproduced, which is the bedrock of science. Gray Scientists often play on the leading edge of science, but also many Gray Scientists are not pursuing valid stuff, or their lack of funding makes their shoestring efforts never rise past garage tinkering. The best of them have been unfairly marginalized by White Science or they were co-opted/wiped out by Black Science agents, while the Gray Science ranks also are filled with people called “cranks” and other unflattering epithets.

Black Science operates out of the public eye, and what goes on in there can be spectacular beyond almost all imagination, and it can also be evil beyond almost all imagination, and my fellow travelers have experienced both. People claiming to be Black Scientists or privy to what is happening behind that shroud are being allowed to speak and write, and the nature of that milieu is such that they are never really in position to substantiate their claims. They can tell the truth sometimes, if their masters grant such freedom, but they are often spinning disinformation, either as part of the role they are playing, or they are being fed disinformation and truly believe what they are saying.

Also, many attention-seekers have posed as Black Science insiders coming in from the cold, and they regularly make the conspiracist rounds, getting everybody in that milieu all hot and bothered. Black Science in the public arena is a three-ring circus, and I generally stay away from it and take all “insider” revelations with a grain of salt. What I have primarily relied on for my Black Science information is fellow travelers who either stumbled into something where Godzilla took an interest (usually around FE, but not always), saw something they were not supposed to see (usually from the military or aerospace ranks), or were shown something from Godzilla’s Golden Hoard. In order to be eligible for a show like that, you have to play at the highest levels of the public game and have survived a murder attempt or two before you begin to be taken seriously enough to get a show. I do not plan to ever play at those levels. I do not need to see their gizmos. Close associates have seen enough of the stuff in action to satisfy me as to the reality, and I really don’t want to try to dodge attempts to take me out. No thanks. Give me a boring life, please.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
21st May 2014, 03:51
Hi:

I doubt that I can overemphasize that I will be seeking some very unusual people. Almost nobody has ever broken out of their scarcity-based conditioning while also trying to attain a big picture view of the situation. When most people even glimpse it, they are overwhelmed and either run away or lash out in fear. Those are normal reactions, but I am looking for people courageous enough to have gotten past them. Again, not many do, probably around one in-10,000 or so. But they can be as few as one-in-a-million for this to work.

I am constantly reminded that even those around me do not consider my life’s experiences as real events. They deny that voice in my head, or its prescience, and the like. The events in my life have been all too real, and even I sometimes marvel, wondering if they really happened, and I was there. In January 1989, after I got over thinking about killing “bad guys,” and evil-minded they were, I decided that I would do whatever I could to get Dennis out of jail. He was in solitary confinement at the time for daring to throw a Christmas party for his inmates:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#solitary

Dennis was writing that he did not expect to live to see this side of the bars again, and it did not look like he had a snowball’s chance in hell. The forces of evil seemed to have it all locked up. Then I sacrificed my life, Mr. Professor ended up sacrificing his with me, and the miracle happened. Writing an essay and trying to help those needles in haystacks think comprehensively is nothing compared to facing those dark days in the 1980s. I am getting plenty of people around me who really do not understand what I am attempting, and all I can say is that they are not in my target audience. :) As I have stated repeatedly, if somebody really understands what I am doing, nobody else in their daily lives will, and that applies to me, too. I have been able to get some around me to understand aspects of it, but I am not sure that anybody around me understands yet, and some are trying hard, real hard. So, what chance do my readers have of convincing anybody in their lives? Slim to none, I would say.

But, I so clearly recall when I lived with Dennis and his family in Boston in January 1987, with little more than the clothes in our backs, our bank account overdrawn, the snow deep on the ground, and trying to recover from the catastrophe in Seattle. A little over a year later, Dennis was being offered a $1 billion to go away. I don’t have anybody like Dennis in my hip pocket, but I have seen what a handful of people can get going. What I am about to try out can work, and nobody needs to play Indiana Jones. It won’t be easy, and it will take more than a handful, but it will not risk lives, either, if I can find the right people.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
21st May 2014, 19:42
Hi:

I have pals banging away at the essay, and I will likely have my editor’s hat on for a few days more, before I move on to other tasks. This will be one of those strategic, “Why am I doing it this way?” posts.

I have written plenty on how I began with the inventor’s perspective and became quite the spiritual and business student, and all of those studies, and some real-world experience, made me ripe for that voice in my head that led me to Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice2

and then my odyssey began. Our effort quickly graduated past the world’s best heating system:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

to the pursuit of FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#pursuit

As I write this, I still have a hard time believing that it all happened, but it was all too real. Be careful what you wish for, is all I can say. :)

Again, we were extremely ignorant of our predecessors in the field, such as the Teslas and Morays, and we were about to learn some very harsh lessons about how the world really works. Three years after Dennis got his first FE idea, my life was shattered and I had been radicalized, and would never see the world the same way again:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#books

and I had serious doubt about the entire Level 10 approach:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

I kept rejecting Dennis’s efforts to get me back in the saddle with him, until I was burned out at the job I took after leaving Ventura:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/trucking.htm#footnotes

and I did not last long with Dennis in 1996-1997, and later realized that I was risking prison with Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/other.htm#sting

When he came to my house in 2006, to get me involved with him again:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=694872&highlight=wirec#post694872

I did not tell him to get the hell out of my house, but I did not consider his offer for a nanosecond, and as I read the FTC’s charges a few years later:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#ftc

I am almost ashamed to admit it, but my primary reaction was about “Thank God, I did not let Dennis coax me into being involved with him again!” When I saw him last year, he was still doing a little recruiting with me, as I am about the only person he trusts outside of his family.

After a few years of performing the study and writing for what became my site today, I let Brian O recruit me into his efforts:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#moon

and he was trying to stir up Level 10 efforts, and I co-founded NEM with him:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#nem

and I ended up bankrolling it, as I resumed my career the month after we founded NEM. I bailed out of NEM the next year, about when Brian was also bailing out to South America, and I will never do the mass movement thing again.

When people are being murdered, surviving murder attempts, getting kangarooed into prison while the prison officials try to get them murdered, and lives are wrecked and shortened and billion dollar offers to go away are being thrown around, words cannot express the kinds of learning experiences that come with such events. I can never really relate all that I learned from my journey, but I saw the many downsides of what we were attempting, and the wounds from our “allies” were usually the deepest, as greed and fear overwhelmed them, along with other human foibles.

I watched Dennis gather huge crowds that would give him a standing ovation one day and cheer at his figurative lynching the next. I watched Brian use his astronaut cachet to try to get people’s attention. I kept seeing that for the magnitude of what we were taking on – the biggest event in the human journey – we were attracting people who were trying to jump on a bandwagon and gravy train, and they were always more harm than good, in the end. I saw the naïve gung-hoers, with absolutely no idea what they were in for, sally forth, proselytizing to their friends, families, and colleagues, and it not only almost never turned out as they hoped, the opposite often happened, where their friendships, family relationships, and even careers ended. Everybody was trying to pour the new wine into the old skins, and the results were almost always a catastrophe. As I have people banging on the essay, and I am hearing from various corners, I am not sure if anybody quite gets it yet. My essay is designed so that if somebody truly does the work, which will take months of hard work at a minimum, after already having some kind of awakening experience, that what I am attempting to do will finally dawn on them in something resembling fullness. But I can already tell that most people who read that essay are not going to understand (most will not read very far or skip to the end, and that is fine - maybe they will get something out of it, but it will fall far short of what I will be looking for), even in “hip” corners, and that is OK.

I am going to be very picky about whom I end up inviting into the choir, for their protection as well as the choir’s. Godzilla is not dead, and if my effort gains any traction, the silver-tongued psychopaths (both free-lance and on Godzilla's payroll) will attempt to worm their way into the choir and either steal it or wreck it. On one hand, many might think it would be an exercise in futility and quite stupid, as much of my material is about my journey. How the heck could somebody steal that? Well, as I saw during my days with Dennis and Brian, plenty of people think that they can, as the lure of FE is so immense that their delusions of grandeur and greed overwhelm them.

Dennis Leahy is the real deal, but as I have written before, when the psychopaths arrive, they look and act just like Dennis, and I repeatedly watched them maneuver the naïve into doing their bidding to steal/wreck the effort, and then those stooges got a knife in their ribs when their usefulness expired. The biggest threat to what I will be attempting will be naïve newbies with bright ideas and a gung-ho attitude who want to go proselytizing, not the predators. My approach will not only be intended to dissuade them from my material, but I will also be very wary of them, and I will allow very few, if any, of them into what I am doing.

The essay is intended to not only convey the immensity of FE, but to also help those who do the work to develop a comprehensive picture of the situation, so they keep their eye on the ball and are not distracted by the daily circus on Earth, which includes New Age and conspiracist flavors of the day, the headlines of the mainstream media, and the FE inventor of the hour who thinks he is the messiah.

I am doing something different, radically different than any other kind of attempt that I know of. I do not know if it will help, but it won’t hurt, at least if I can keep the naïve newbies, gung-hoers, predators, and others out of it, and I will not give them much incentive in the first place. It will not be easy, but I am going to be taking it very slow and steady, and will put my foot down on all the attempts that there are going to be to mass market what I am doing, get me on Oprah, and the like. What I am doing is not suited for that. I learned my lessons with Dennis and Brian, and will not repeat those mistakes, no matter how desperate the situation seems. If I can find those needles in haystacks who have the right stuff and do the work, maybe we will get somewhere.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
22nd May 2014, 13:00
Hi:

As should be evident in the chapter drafts that I have put up, the essay is taking the long view. There are several reasons for that. One of them is to help the readers develop an epochal frame of mind. When readers can get in that state, their big picture orientation will help keep their attention on the issue, and they will not be jumping on a bandwagon, tasting the flavor of the day, and other flash-in-the-pan approaches that I have seen used for making FE happen. Nobody needs to raise money to keep an effort alive, play games to keep up people’s interest, and those kinds of short-term strategies of survival. This is going to be a long, slow effort, and people will need to put in the work in order to build the foundation for their awareness that can support the manifestation of FE over the long run.

There is not going to be some hero to save the humanity from itself, nobody is going to get rich quick, nobody is going on Oprah or meeting at the White House, and there will not be any stampede. The kinds of people drawn to those kinds of activities get drawn away to the next glittery spectacle, the next get-rich-quick scheme; they gawk at the next inventor of the hour, and so on.

What I just finished drafting I can keep using for my effort until I am 85 years old. Humanity needs to embrace FE before then if humanity is going to make it, but my plan is to form a foundation of abiding interest in the issue, which will help humanity turn the corner. As I have been stating for the past decade, Godzilla’s greatest triumph is making FE and what can come with it unimaginable:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm

My goal is to make it imaginable:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#imagine

I am by no means done with my efforts, but I have finished with the heavy lifting in this lifetime, and am putting the ball in the court of others, who will have the tools needed to expand their awareness of these epochally important issues, with FE front and center. I am looking for needles in haystacks. I think I can find them, but we will see.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
22nd May 2014, 13:42
Hi:

With more than 2,000 posts, few of them short, I cannot recall how much I got into the video of Sparky Sweet’s device working. I do not think that the video that Bearden sells:

http://www.cheniere.org/sales/sweetvideos.htm

is on YouTube or anywhere else like it. I had to buy the video like anybody else. Sparky was one of the few FE inventors with the goods to demonstrate it, but if you watch that video, you will see something like “Proprietary Technology” flash across the screen several times, which highlights one of the paths of failure that I have seen many FE businessmen use, and current examples are Mills and Rossi. Here is what I wrote in my essay, where I list all the approaches that are doomed and why:

2. Not patenting an FE invention and keeping it proprietary:

a. Keeping technology secret is the same game that the GCs play; Western “medicine” went through a proprietary medicine craze, where snake oil and other secret-ingredient “medicines” were sold, and there are unscrupulous people in the FE field who sell the snake-oil equivalent of FE;

b. Genuine FE inventors who really have something are often tarred with the same brush as the charlatans when they play the proprietary technology game;

c. The only people in the dark when FE inventors play the proprietary technology game is the public; whatever the FE inventor built, the GCs developed to a commercial level at least fifty years ago, and they have the 35th generation of the technology of what the FE inventor built in his garage; such inventors are either oblivious to that reality or they think that somehow they will be allowed to succeed, and often harbor the rest of those 18-year-old fantasies; people such as Sparky Sweet took their “secret sauce” proprietary information to their graves with them, unwittingly making the GCs’ job pretty easy, as they self-suppressed their technology;

d. Identically with those applying for patents, those playing the proprietary technology game have announced their self-interest and are easily suppressed by the GCs’ bag of tricks;


Sparky is kind of a textbook example of the ways that not only FE inventors go wrong, but the kinds of treatments that inventors with the goods have received.

Sparky was a career scientist at General Electric before he retired and played around in his field of specialty: magnetism. He stumbled into his method of conditioning the magnets, and he took his secret to his grave with him, making Godzilla’s job really easy. As with Dennis in his early days in Seattle:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

Sparky thought that the energy industry would welcome his invention, and he would get a tickertape parade after he mailed off working prototypes to the big energy institutions. The opposite happened, and Sparky was subjected to a pretty full array of suppression tactics. I do not think that he ever got the big money offer, but I could be wrong. I really have not dug too deeply into Sparky’s story other than what those around me reported, who knew or worked with him. But as Sparky began to try to put together deals, some shadowy interest blew them apart, just like Dennis experienced in Seattle:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#seattle1

Then Sparky was delivered that infamous photo taken through the walls of his house, along with the first overt threat. Bearden claimed that Sparky survived murder attempts, but I don’t know about that. But Sparky kept at it. Not long after that video was made of Sparky’s device in action (the same year that we hit Ventura, just down the road from Sparky), a scientist in our organization met with Sparky. Sparky was highly aware of how we were being disemboweled, and watched in horror. I will never forget the awe in that scientist’s voice as he described watching Sparky’s device kick into overdrive as ice formed on it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

The next year, I met Brian O, and he told me who that old man was with his gizmo:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#meet

Ten years later, I got to hear about Sparky’s grim end from Brian:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sparky

who then told me of his life-shortening encounters with the establishment’s underbelly:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

When Brian fled to South America after Mallove was murdered:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#portland

I was sympathetic. Sparky’s tale should be required reading for any FE aspirant who think he/she can scale the ramparts. But almost without exception, like those 18-year-old boys:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

those newbies and FE tinkerers think that they have the magic solutions, that they can sneak past Godzilla, that they can go get patents, play on Wall Street, and all the rest of those fantasies. Not much has changed from Sparky’s days that I know of, other than most of Godzilla’s members getting pretty nervous about the game of chicken with Earth that they are playing, and showing off their wares to a select few:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#underground

The FE inventor who thinks that he can waltz into the patent office, Oval Office, or Wall Street suffers from potentially deadly naïveté, but I see no end to such aspirants, and as we saw recently, it is easy to get highly inflated notions of self-importance:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

FE coming onto the public stage will be the biggest event in the human journey, by far, but all of those heroic, messianic, capitalistic approaches do not have a prayer, and people who put blueprints on the Internet, so the tinkerers can have it, really do not understand, either. It is a lot harder than it looks, and a bunch of garage tinkerers are not going to get the effort where it needs to be. The entire FE field is in a state of arrested development, and it is time for a more mature approach. I am trying to help form the foundation of such an approach, and we will see how it goes.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
22nd May 2014, 15:13
Hi:

As my pals bang away on the essay, I am doing a lot of private correspondence, and I will often “recycle” my correspondence and turn it into an Avalon post. It is more efficient that way. :)

Here is a sanitized version of one of my exchanges this morning. The correspondent wanted to try to better understand the minds of all the scientists and academics who play the Level 3 game of denial:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

where they first say that FE is “impossible,” as it defies the “laws of physics.” Then they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” and to boot, they will usually drag out their Level 5 fears:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5

and say that it is a good thing that FE is “impossible,” because we would only blow up each other and the planet if we had it. And then they run away as fast as they can. The correspondent also asked why we could not just do direct solar or the traditional alternatives instead, and take the low road.

Here is my reply…

As I discovered during my days with Dennis, even “benign” stuff like super heat pumps and high-MPG carburetors are ruthlessly suppressed, and if people do the work and digest my essay, they will see that the “alternatives” are really no answer at all: way too little and too late to save us, and far, far short of abundance. Brian eventually realized how foolish the traditional alternatives are, which he was a big supporter of in the 1970s:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#udall

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#udall

like so many of us were.

It took Brian and me many years, of seeing reactions from big names in science and academia, and even many “visionaries,” from both the mainstream and the fringes, ad nauseum, and trading notes with other fellow travelers, for us to begin to understand what we were seeing. The primary replies of scientists and academics are the standard Level 3 responses:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

but their vehemence and, frankly, their irrationality, eventually pointed to something else happening, at least to me, and that was about when I began seeing it as an effect of how they adapted their entire beings to scarcity:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

That addiction to scarcity, and the structuralist blinders that the sophisticated wear:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#conspiracism

are some of my original contributions to the subject. I do not know if anybody else independently arrived at the same conclusions, but mine were formed by just being out there, doing it, for many years. When I made those observations in that “paradigm” essay (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm), they brought Brian back into my life, after our dire disappointment with how NEM turned out.

Virtually everybody plays the denial game, but those scientists and academics have merely dressed up their fears and addictions in slightly more sophisticated clothes. This kind of circular reasoning:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#circular

which one scientist that I interacted with almost perfectly exemplified, is typical of the “smart.” Brian lived through countless instances of those kinds of reactions, over several years of playing the Paul Revere of FE (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions) before he began to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

I will never have the kind of access that Brian had, but I had innumerable encounters like he did, playing at a lower level of that game. You do it for long enough, and the reality of what you are seeing eventually dawns on you. It took me more than a dozen years for it to begin to sink in, and that was after my radicalizing adventures with Dennis.

The bottom line is that no non-FE group on Earth will even embrace the possibility of FE, and the FE organizations that I am aware of are all stuck in arrested development, where their members not only lie about Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#libel

and attack Brian (and I am referring to many of the biggest names in the field), they embrace the scoundrels and criminals, in their naïveté and lack of discernment (and yes, there are provocateurs in their ranks, but the members of those organizations do most of the provocateurs’ work for them, with their lack of integrity and lack of discernment), which is why I no longer want to have anything to do with the FE field as it exists today. If there is going to be a group that can maturely and honestly address the issue, somebody needs to build it from scratch. That is what I am trying to do, and we will see how it goes. Anybody who thinks that there is a shortcut simply has no experience in the field or on the high road.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
22nd May 2014, 17:44
Hi,


Originally posted by Wade Frazier: Virtually everybody plays the denial game, but those scientists and academics have merely dressed up their fears and addictions in slightly more sophisticated clothes."

It is the amount of conditioning and programming done on this planet from birth which prevents the human brain to inquire that which is not within the confinements of what it was programmed with, scientists included. It seems that only a few people are immune to this.

So apparently Wade's generated approach which is based on a level of understanding that is beyond the very well set fence, will grow sprouts only while a breakthrough in the collective mind software will take place. It is a perpetual work in progress, but it is nearing an end now.



Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "The bottom line is that no non-FE group on Earth will even embrace the possibility of FE, and the FE organizations that I am aware of are all stuck in arrested development"


"If there is going to be a group that can maturely and honestly address the issue, somebody needs to build it from scratch. "

It is so often that you, Wade, are putting an emphasis on integrity, and also telling about the times and past attempts of Dennis and yourself to recruit the environmental organisations to the FE plate, with no amount of success. So, this may probably not be of surprise to you, but to anyone else who may want to spend time watching this short video (a couple of minutes is enough) please beware that it takes the throat reflex a while to return to normal operation..

Is this how it goes behind the scenes?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOX5ehfFF7I

All the best,

Limor

Robert J. Niewiadomski
22nd May 2014, 19:19
Limor, i guess the video is about "anti-fracking" movie "Promised land" being an inside job ;) The movie itself portrays an inside job within an inside job ;) Imho if it keeps the viewer away from realising energy IS all that matters, instead of money, while being the movie about the energy, it really doesn't matter which level of an inside job within an inside job within an inside job we are talking about. Mission accomplished as they say :(

Wade Frazier
22nd May 2014, 23:53
Hi:

I hiked today. In my old age, I am a lot less ambitious than when younger. For the past several years, I have some favorite mountains and hikes on them, and I do them regularly. One of my favorites I do about once a week, and I just finished my third hike to where those waterfalls and streams were. Today, it reminded me of the rainforests of Pandora, without, of course, and blue-skinned natives. :)

I am attaching a few pics from today, along with one taken in my front yard. This is definitely when my yard is its prettiest.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
23rd May 2014, 00:19
Hi Limor and Robert:

Kind of like global warming, the energy issue is a huge political football that many score points on. I have seen the fake environmentalists, those being used by other interests:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#protest

and so on. That is all part of the problem. Virtually all environmentalists are against the idea of FE, treating it like the enemy:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose.htm#environmentalists

I have seen it all, and Arab interests have also come into play in my journey, as you might imagine. The Arabs just want to sell as much oil as possible, to keep their princes on the gravy train, while it lasts.

It is easy to get wrapped up in the distractions that surround the energy issue, and there are innumerable ones. I do my best to steer straight through to what I am attempting, and not lose my focus.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
23rd May 2014, 16:54
Hi:

I am likely taking advantage of some downtime soon and wiping my hard drive and reinstalling programs, as four years of the same operating system has led to some glitches that are annoying, but I needed some downtime to do it, and I am getting a little. We will see if I am offline for a while. I hope not, but those projects can get dicey.

Here is another example of where people understand the relationship between energy and the monetary economy. One is obviously dependent on the other, with energy the kingpin.

http://ourfiniteworld.com/2014/05/21/the-connection-between-oil-prices-debt-levels-and-interest-rates/

Brian O taught what is called “Physics for Poets” at Princeton, where he taught the rudiments of physics to non-scientists. My essay might be called “FE and a Comprehensive Perspective for Poets.” :)

I have scientists and academics reviewing the essay, to make sure I do not pull any boners, but I am gambling that I can help non-scientists raise their awareness of the FE issue to the more mature levels that are needed to mount a successful effort. And there is also plenty in it that will be new for scientists, too, even challenging. When Dennis got into the heat pump business:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#dennis

the world’s best heat pump was going nowhere, as the field was dominated by engineers, scientists, and tinkerers. Dennis tried to bring that moribund niche to the big time, and did it so well that the local electric interests in Washington State pulled all the stops to wipe him out:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

and before long, we had Godzilla’s attention. The FE field today is in that same state of arrested development, dominated by scientists, inventors, and tinkerers, and largely gawking “supporters,” and that recent “I am the messiah” announcement:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

(and not being laughed at) reflects some of the big problems that the FE field has. The closest thing to a real messiah that the FE field had was Dennis, but all that those in the field can do is lie about Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#libel

and non-discerning FE enthusiasts, and even people in the field, have handed me that libel tract as an example of great writing on the issue. Man, what a wreck of a milieu, and that is largely why Brian said that the people in the FE field today would not be the people who would bring FE to the world:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#new

But, as I learned the hard way, there is virtually nobody that has ever been in the FE field with a chance, including Dennis. Almost none have the integrity to progress much beyond garage tinkering, and all the mass movement efforts are plagued with scoundrels, naïveté, Godzilla’s agents, and other deficiencies. I really want nothing to do with today’s FE field, and will be looking for people outside the field.

When I was a trucking company controller:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/trucking.htm#footnotes

I hired from outside the industry, as those within it did not have what I needed. That vision that I came up with in trucking was a “bright idea,” that without somebody like me leading it, will go nowhere. For my FE “bright idea,” I will plan to lead the chorus that I will try to form, and we will see if it can help.

My essay is not really all that challenging, intellectually. There will be plenty to chew on, but there is very little math, and nothing that people really need scientific training to understand. The goal is to help those poets became somewhat literate, scientifically, but it also goes far beyond that, and there will be plenty for the “smart” to sink their teeth into.

My work will be challenging where it takes on the foundational assumptions that gird all the dominant ideologies, which is scarcity, at its root, which is in turn based on energy scarcity:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

I won’t deny that I developed some unique, paradigmatic perspectives, which is partly why Brian wanted to work with me:

http://www.brianoleary.info/Impacts.html

but my material is not so much intellectually demanding as it is emotionally and egocentrically. I have seen some of the smartest people I know say some of the stupidest things I ever heard, and it was because they were drinking the egocentric Kool-Aid of their indoctrination. So-called intelligence is not the key, but those poets will have to at least understand the rudiments of how the world really works, so they are not distracted, and there are distractions every day, about things that do not make any difference at all for changing the trajectory to catastrophe that humanity is on, that people constantly gossip about. Virtually all people hack at branches, if they hack at all, because they have a very stunted awareness, and scientific illiteracy is part of that problem. When some FE scientist or inventor gets on stage with his gizmo, or just talks it up, or even just writes papers on potential gizmos, all manner of onlookers think that that stuff is important, when it does not matter much at all. I am not saying that they might not have something - many have – but having a working prototype, or more commonly, a proof of concept demonstration, is only a few steps in a journey to the far ends of Earth, but the presenter and his audience are deluded into thinking that they are near the end of the journey, not the beginning.

While my work is not all that intellectually demanding, it is high minded, and it will have no place for the kinds of delusions that dominate Levels 1 to 11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level1

People who are stuck in those levels cannot help me with what I am doing, and the choir is not intended for people still stuck there. Avalon and elsewhere will likely be where newbies and enthusiasts will have to get that out of their system, if my patience can handle it, and the most common issue I see is people trying to make my work into something for a Level 10 effort:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

Dennis and Brian repeatedly mounted Level 10 efforts, and most of my learning in the milieu came via Level 10 efforts, and after nearly twenty years of supporting such efforts, I do not have any interest in them, and I am trying something different. I am looking for unusual people, who have broken out of their indoctrination, which usually came about by direct personal experience of how false their indoctrination was. When somebody can see through one of the mind-traps, the others are easier to see through.

Almost everybody who encounters my work and likes it will try to turn on their friends, family, and colleagues onto it, think that I should be on Oprah, speaking at conferences, and the like. They have yet to really understand the nature of what I am doing. If they really understand my work, they will know that nobody in their daily lives really will. But, my essay is intended for even them to do some fishing. Instead of talking themselves blue in the face, they can just send people to my essay, and see what happens. Those who will be candidates for the choir will not come up for air for months, and when they do, they will be singing something close to Level 12, not coming with their Level 10 “bright ideas.”

And people do not get to Level 12 because they are so smart, but because they no longer drink the Kool-Aid, and the red, white, and blue Kool-Aid that Americans drink is perhaps the most insidious of all, and is why Americans are not really in my target audience. I have some Americans in my circles, but one and all, I can see where they struggle with their indoctrination, thinking that we can whip up the masses, storm the White House and Wall Street, and save the day. I have carried Dennis’s and Brian’s spears as we approached the DOE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#yull

http://www.brianoleary.info/Impacts.html

had encounters with the White House:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=694872&highlight=wirec#post694872

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#yull

watched Dennis put 5,000 people into a stadium to talk up FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#philly

and many, many other activities that taught me how futile such approaches ultimately are, not to mention dangerous. Those whom I seek to attract to my work have to have gotten the mass movement delusions out of their system if they are going to be of any help. That does not mean that it is going to be a handful of people, either. But with the Internet, I can try to find my several thousand singers out of a population of several billion. I like those odds.

My work is not amenable to the YouTube clip mentality, even though there are interviews with me on YouTube and elsewhere. Those were just intended as an introduction, and I may do some more once I publish my essay, but that will definitely not be the emphasis. There is also a mountain of chaff for every kernel of wheat on the fringes, and some scientific literacy can help prevent people from disappearing down the rabbit holes that lead nowhere. I have seen innumerable casualties in the FE field because of that lack of discernment, but a lack of discernment regarding the psychopaths (on Godzilla’s payroll and free-lancers) and opportunists is the deadliest naïveté in this field.

There will be no bandwagon for what I am doing, and that essay is partly intended to deflate that kind of mentality. People are going to have to go deep, to learn the abundance song and sing it, but it will be more of an emotional and integrity challenge than an intellectual one.

But I am also not looking for heroes, especially the kind like Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

Mass movements led by heroes, trying to survive being scorched by Godzilla’s fire, and being mauled by their “allies,” is not what I am trying to do, and we will see how it goes.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
23rd May 2014, 22:36
Well, that was not too bad. Lots of software to reinstall, but I got the basics back quickly. Boy, it is a lot easier than it used to be. I decided to upgrade my hard drive while I was at it. Pretty hitchless.

Wade Frazier
24th May 2014, 17:38
Well, it took less than a day to fix all of that. Anybody who has done this for long enough, especially in the Wintel world, knows well of lost days, weeks, and worse. For all of its many problems, the process has become far easier.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
24th May 2014, 23:55
Hi:

In this surprising little lull that I have, before my next hurricane begins, I have been reflecting on many issues, and the subjects that my essay covers are always playing in my head.

As readers know, my energy journey began forty years ago, when my first professional mentor invented the world's best engine for powering an automobile:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#glimpse

The scientists who studied it thought that it would get about 200 MPG in town, and lower on the highway, the opposite of cars today. The recycling of energy thrown away in braking, the lower friction (tires on the ground, and wind hitting the car) at lower speeds would have done that. Ironically, it seems that the people who may have stolen the engine:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#car

got Godzilla's cement shoes. When Dennis came to invite me to Washington:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=694872&highlight=wirec#post694872

in ways, it came full circle for me, where people were trying to wring more energy out of a gallon of gasoline. For a number of reasons, I no longer have much interest in that stuff, not to mention how the aspirant was always wiped out. Gangsters run the system.

Also, however, it has come full circle for me in a more satisfying way. I had my mystical awakening at almost the same time that I began dreaming of changing the energy industry:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#introduction

As I dove into my spiritual studies, part of me wondered what good it would do, as people could not make a living at it (except for priests and New Age gurus, I suppose), but before I graduated from college, Seth's observation was one of the stars that I steered by:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/visions.htm#idealist

and all these years later, after my life-wrecking odyssey, and seeing what the journeys of what people like Dennis and Brian were like, I came to realize that my youthful "infatuation" with enlightenment and love is probably the only path to FE that might have a chance. I am not sure if anybody who claimed enlightenment really achieved it, but I have come to conclude that the path of enlightenment, not necessarily of attaining it, but of just pursuing it and doing the work, is going to be the key. That is easy to say. :)

Even if it does not directly manifest FE, it surely cannot hurt.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
25th May 2014, 11:39
Hi:

The action might be over here today:


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?29372-What-technologies-activities-or-concepts-will-be-made-obsolete-by-Free-Energy&p=838027&viewfull=1#post838027

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
25th May 2014, 16:42
Hi:

Here are a few other observations, as I enjoy a little down time. One of my gifts was in math, and like many others with that gift, I crunch numbers for a living in the financial economy. It is kind of like the saying that you should never enter a restaurant through the kitchen: those producing the financial information that the current system uses are far less enamored of it than the consumers are. Eventually, I was able to see the clearly fraudulent nature of the financial economy, as the real economy, the one that runs on energy, declines:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/savings.htm#coming

I see many abuses of numerical data, in not only the financial world, but it has also been used to make science unnecessarily arcane, which was partly due to the battle that Galileo had with the Catholic Church. My essay has very little math in it, and the numbers I use are generally order-of-magnitude accurate, as that is all that is needed to get the concepts across. An example is this little addition/revision to my essay:


"Almost all traditional alternative energy sources and related technologies have low EROIs (direct solar 2-to-8, wind turbines 18, geothermal less than 5). Those alternative sources all have the same problems that wind and water power had before the Industrial Revolution and more, such as being intermittent, not much energy is available to begin with, and they all create environmental impacts that, while not as great as fossil and nuclear fuels, are still considerable. Wind turbines not only kill vast numbers of birds each year, but they are noisy and create inland turbulence. In order to replace fossil fuels, there would need to be about four hundred times as many windmills on Earth as there already are, and I have driven through several windmill farms in the USA, which are spread across many miles of suitable terrain. In order to raise humanity to the American standard of living, there would need to be far more than a thousand times as many windmills. There may not be enough suitable land on Earth to host those windmills, and windmills are considered the most viable traditional alternative. Direct solar, including photovoltaics, makes the most sense in deserts. However, it does not deliver much energy, but is considered the next most viable alternative, and there would have to be about four thousand times as many photovoltaic arrays as already exist to raise the world to the American standard of living. Again, finding the land to host them is a problem, and the materials need to be mined. There are maintenance issues and other problems. Brian O’Leary began his alternative energy career promoting the traditional alternatives, and the plan that he developed for American presidential candidate Mo Udall looked startlingly like what the winner of that election, Jimmy Carter, soon unveiled. In his last years, Brian called traditional alternatives too little and too late to solve our energy problems. Rock is not a good conductor, so heat is rapidly depleted from the geothermal source and it quickly goes “dry,” and has to go “fallow” to recover. Although the organized suppression inflicted on technologies such as my partner’s heat pump are partly why there is not much alternative energy technology on the market, their low EROI and low available energy are leading reasons why those traditional alternative energy sources are not viable replacements for hydrocarbon energy. Forty years after Jimmy declared the moral equivalent of war on energy, traditional alternative energy still amounts to less than 1% of American energy production. Zero-point energy technology dwarfs all alternative and mainstream energy sources, with available energy and EROIs that go off the scale."


All the time, I see people present numerical information with either misleading levels of precision, use them to make irrelevant points, or even use them to baffle the reader, not help inform them.

Einstein and Schroedinger were not fans of just crunching the numbers of quantum physics and getting the right answers; they wanted to understand what was really happening, and the quantum enigma that lies at the heart of quantum physics shows how scientists are not in touch with the bedrock of reality, and the best of them knew that:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

but the hack scientists have tried to turn science into an arcane priesthood, or when they played popularizer like Carl Sagan did, they kind of played Pope, with their inerrant dogma. Einstein avoided math in his work when he could, understanding the seductive limitations of it, kind of like those restaurant workers or accountants.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
25th May 2014, 21:47
Hi:

I am playing on two threads today, and after making this post:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?29372-What-technologies-activities-or-concepts-will-be-made-obsolete-by-Free-Energy&p=838142&viewfull=1#post838142

I remembered something else that I was going to write about. As my posts on this site have shown, my upcoming essay has plenty of anthropology in it, and a great deal of archeology and paleontology. As I studied past civilizations and compared them to what people think of and visit as tourist attractions, it really hit me at times what modern audiences find attractive. Most preserved works what tourists flock to today are ancient elite monuments to themselves. One theory of ancient civilization is that when they built monumental architecture, it was to overawe visitors with an ostentatious display of wealth. It was a way to establish the view of wealth that the elites aspired to, and to impress the idea that joining or submitting to their polity was the wisest course of action.

The very first cities had ziggurats for the priesthoods, essentially the first elites, and the palace was close behind it, and those urban religions always cast the elite as deific figures or divinely chosen to rule, whether it was Mexico, Peru, Egypt, China, or Sumer. It was a universal feature of early civilization, always male dominated, with harems and other perquisites of their position. Even before civilization, grave goods show local elites being buried with ornaments, as elite status was something "naturally" arising with humanity, at least in a world of scarcity.

The necropolis at Giza needed all the surplus food for a century to construct it. Tutankhamun's death mask of gold:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tutmask.jpg

cost the lives of thousands of people, who were worked to death. The Taj Mahal is also an elite tomb, and that terra cotta "army" in China also marked the burial of a member of the elite, and people come from the world over to see those monuments to the elite. Do people marvel at the immense waste of time and energy to aggrandize those ancient elites? It does not seem that way to me.

When I toured Europe at 16:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#europe

I visited about fifty cathedrals and churches, which were intended to establish a similar hegemony over people's minds and spirits. Today, people eagerly tour the Roman Coliseum, which was the site of endless bloodbaths, where people were forced to murder each other.

Those are all relics of barbaric times, which do not seem to be preserved and visited to remind us of how such times were, but celebrated as some wondrous ancient feat.

As scientists have been studying cave paintings and carvings of language into stone, the findings often showed that the cave paintings were often the work of horny teenage boys, of naked women:

http://www.livescience.com/7028-ancient-cave-art-full-teenage-graffiti.html

http://www.livescience.com/3590-obsession-naked-women-dates-35-000-years.html

and the deciphering the runes and other writings, often shows it to be nothing more than graffiti:

http://www.orkneyjar.com/history/maeshowe/maeshrunes.htm

http://www.dandelionmag.ca/the-ancient-history-of-graffiti/

All the earliest writings that can be found were all accounting for elite tribute or tales that aggrandized the elite. Not much inspiring and high minded has survived to enlighten us from those past days, other than maybe showing how far we have progressed since then.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
26th May 2014, 11:28
Hi:

Here is another that issue I have repeatedly encountered on my journey, and is highly germane to my essay. Again, I was trained to be a scientist since childhood, and when that voice first spoke to me:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice

my formal science studies ended, and my essay is arguably the fruit of picking up my science studies again, but my adventures, especially those with Dennis, was really about science and technology in the real world, not academia.

When I resumed my science studies, that time not as a professional or somebody who aspired to be one, it was with real world experience of trying to bring disruptive energy technologies to market, and the sobering realizations that that path entailed. Because of my background, I encountered scientific dissidents early on, such as Brian O, and have encountered many works of "fringe science." However, when I dug into such works, they often fell apart under scrutiny. There was also plenty of legitimate stuff on the fringes, but it was relatively rare. Most of the fringe stuff was chaff, and I found that fringe enthusiasts, the kind that listened to Art Bell while driving trucks, did not even know what the orthodox position was before they adopted some fringe view. I also found that to be the case with even "smart" people on the fringes. "I do not believe in evolution or the Big Bang," I would often hear. When I asked them why, the answers were usually along the lines of "Because my Bible tells me so," or "I just do not like the idea." But it turned out that those "dissidents" usually did not even really know what the orthodox position was, or what the evidence supporting it was, or how the evidence that supposedly contradicted it fared under scrutiny. Disagreeing with the orthodox position, when you really do not even know what it is, is a good way to quickly get lost in the weeds, falling for the story told by the latest guest on Art Bell (and similar shows). I am very familiar with the limits of White Science, but that does not automatically make fringe science valid, or the latest natterings from the fringes.

Most of my essay is the findings of orthodox science. There are many areas where I consider it far more valid than the fringe stuff, while I also am aware of where orthodoxy is limited, and even in a straitjacket.

People need to at least become conversant with the orthodox position, and understand the process of science, before they fly off into fringe land; otherwise they chow down on chaff, thinking that they are eating wheat. That is an epidemic problem of the fringes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
27th May 2014, 18:54
Hi:

This is another strategic post. The vast majority of readers who encounter my essay will skim it, cut to the last chapter, and the like. Maybe they will get something out of it that way, but they are not going to be the people whom I seek.

A universal reaction to the idea of FE, for those who get beyond denial or fear of it (which is far less than 1% of the population – very few graduate beyond Level 5 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5 ), is that they want to tell everybody in their social circles (friends, family, colleagues) the "good news." I have been there, done that, and have watched innumerable people do that, for nearly thirty years.

When Brian O went out to play the Paul Revere of FE in 1996, I had a pretty good idea of what he was in for, but I also knew that he would have access that I never will, and I looked forward to hearing how it went. Five years later, after witnessing the crazed reactions of scientists and academics at the very top echelon, he openly wondered if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

What Brian had yet to realize, and kind of went to his grave denying, was that almost nobody cared. I played at a far higher level of the game than Brian did, and I resisted that lesson until I had it beaten into my head:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

Because almost nobody is willing to admit that truth, however, they keep trying out this and that. To admit that almost nobody on Earth cares for anything but their immediate self-interest is not a judgment, but just an acknowledgment of the reality on Earth today. The proportion of people who care about doing the helpful thing, even if their immediate reward for it is not evident, I estimated back in the late 1990s as maybe 1-in-5,000, and that might be optimistic. That is the sole reason for the predicament that humanity is in. The rest is noise.

I watched Dennis try to appeal to people's self-interest to make something happen, and he regularly appealed to scarcity-based ideologies (which are all egocentric at their root):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

but the orgies of greed and fear that attend the pursuit of FE are easily susceptible to organized suppression, as I discovered the hard way. Hell, Godzilla almost never even needed to roll out of bed, as the efforts self-destructed, or at most, they only needed a nudge by Godzilla's minions (or lower level predators) before it spiraled into a flaming collapse, wreaking devastation far and wide.

Almost all FE newbies, however, are like those 18-year-old boys, pining for the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

Even the best of them just have to go out and find out some of the harsh truth for themselves, and sometimes I just have to sit and watch them rush forth, heading for the abyss, and I cannot even stop them. I really do not like to watch or even hear about it. My better pupils will at least heed to my words of caution enough to not jeopardize their lives, careers, or relationships too much, and they eventually come to me, saying," Well Wade, you were right. But now what?" Such pupils have yet to understand what I am trying to do, but they are now at least willing to listen.

Again, those are just the numbers. If only 1-in-5,000 really cares much, and I do not mean them being heroes, but just caring enough to really do something, question their indoctrination, and the like, the odds are long that anybody who understands my message will have anybody else in their lives who will, as the social circle that people can manage is only about 250 people. So, using those numbers, maybe 1-in-20 of the people who really understand my message will find somebody else in their life who will. And those are people who really understand. If they really understand, they will also know that virtually nobody in their lives will, because they have already had some kind of awakening experience and already saw how their new perspective was received by those around them.

Having one's heart in the right place is more important than all other qualities put together, but it will not be quite enough to become a productive member of the choir. They also have to have the mental horsepower to deal with the complex ideas and information that underlies a comprehensive perspective, and this is where I am doing far more than reaching the readers I am seeking halfway, as I have spent most of my "free time" since 1990 diving into diverse areas of science, politics, economics, and so on, deconstructing them, understanding them from the bottom up, seeing what they had in common, what the differences were, and I have presented what I found in a fairly-easy-to-read essay, with thousands of links for readers to go deeper and develop a comprehensive perspective without having to be a scientist or top-flight academic. I have scientists, academics, and some very bright people reviewing my essay right now, helping to make sure that I do not make any grievous errors. We will see how that process goes, but I am not anticipating anything that will cause me to revise my essay much. I tried to stay within the confines of what I was confident of competently presenting, and what I think will be adequate for developing the level of awareness that I think people need to keep their eye on the ball and not be distracted by the bread and circuses purveyed by the social managers and those mesmerized by the spectacle.

It has taken me forty years to arrive at the approach that I am about to try out in my "spare" time, and it is very much unique, to my knowledge. Nobody I know of, who has survived on the FE battlefield for long, has ever attempted what I am about to. It might not help at all, but raised awareness is never wasted, in the big picture of the journey of our souls through physical reality.

On one hand, the heavy lifting is done for me in this lifetime. I am far from finished, but I have an approach that I am going to try out, and I will not be dissuaded by newbies who have to rush out and "do something," those enamored by the inventor-of-the-hour, the inventor who approaches me with his/her gizmo, expecting The Muppet Movie ending, and the like. I have already experienced and seen what will not work, have seen enough carnage for a lifetime, and have no interest in those naïve and inexperienced approaches. If that means that the choir begins with five people, and I can’t get the first candidate to hit the notes for five years, then so be it. I am seeing better numbers than that already, but I will not be goaded by the impatience and desperation (and, frankly, misunderstandings) of others, and since the path to delivering technology, which is ultimately the goal, is to give it away, in a completely transparent setting, the psychopaths, provocateurs, and other opportunists are going to have a hard time cracking that nut.

I am now editing some of the other essays on my site, mainly those older ones from the 2002 version of my site. The fluoride and Columbus essays are the oldest ones on my site, researched and first written in 1997-1998 (with small revisions in 2001, and odds and ends since then), and I recently revised my Columbus essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm

and the others will have similar revisions, to update them for my style today, new information, and the like.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
27th May 2014, 23:16
Hi:

This essay is going to be kind of difficult to integrate into my site, but I wrote it with that in mind. For instance, I wrote about enzymes and the fluorine ion in the essay, intending to connect it to my revised fluoridation essay. As I revise the fluoridation essay, I am making the cross-essay references, and the below is one of my revisions to the fluoride essay.


The fluorine ion disrupts hydrogen bonds. When chemicals are combined, atoms with a higher bonding affinity will “steal” the bonds from other atoms, and a negatively charged ion will have a higher attraction to a positive charge than a negatively charged atom in a covalent bond, where one atom is merely hogging the electrons, as is the case with hydrogen bonds. Because it holds its electrons more tightly than any other element, fluorine forms the smallest negatively charged ion of any element, and that small size allows fluorine ions to go where the larger ions of other elements cannot. Those fluorine ions can get in close ad replace the hydrogen bonds in numerous enzymes and DNA, which wrecks the enzyme. In biology labs today, fluorine ions are the preferred way to poison enzymes, as they break the "lock" that the "key" will fit into, making the enzyme useless. The fluorine ion acts similarly to “free radicals” in the body. That is how the fluorine ion harms or kills people, and it can lead to genetic damage when it attack's DNA's hydrogen bonds.

Another common industrial element, chlorine, which is in fluorine's chemical family, behaves similarly, and the chlorine issue is another one where chlorine is undoubtedly carcinogenic, among other health hazards, but industrial propaganda and criminal activity prevents meaningful chlorine regulation. Chlorine is the other element compulsorily added to the water supply, to kill microorganisms.

No scientist will dispute the idea that fluorides are deadly poisons, as it is universally accepted. Among the hazards of fluoride are dental fluorosis, skeletal fluorosis, sterility, birth defects, cancer, and brain damage.

Dental fluorosis progresses with increased fluorine ion concentration as follows. First, the teeth develop a mottled look. Flecks can be seen on the enamel. Tooth mottling can begin at less than one part per million ("PPM"), which is the concentration added to the water supply in communities that fluoridate their water. As the concentration rises to two PPM, the teeth discolor, gradually turning brown. Accompanying this process, the teeth become hard and brittle. The teeth then begin chipping and disintegrating. While the mechanism of fluorine destruction and "protection" of teeth has been obscure during the era of fluoridation, recent research has shown that the fluorine ion inhibits the enzyme that forms enamel, which causes malformed enamel. Somehow, malformed enamel protects teeth, at least in the eyes of fluoridation proponents. In Frank McClure’s Water Fluoridation, The Search and the Victory, there is a color photo section showing the progress of dental fluorosis. In advanced cases, the teeth are reduced to blackened stumps (images of this process are easily available on the Internet). With skeletal fluorosis, the skeleton disintegrates.


I will publish the fluoride essay revision before I publish the big essay, and there will be some links to the essay, but they will be kind of blind links, but will link to the relevant text when I publish the essay.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
28th May 2014, 02:46
Hi:

Well, that was fast:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm

I am sure that I could have spent more time on it, like another day or so, but that will have to be good enough for now. Less opinion, more fact, fewer adjectives and adverbs, and more nouns and verbs…. Those are some of the writing lessons I learned since I first drafted that essay back in 1998. It still kind of reflects that youthful approach, but less so than it used to. My big essays – war, medicine, American Empire, and cover-up essays, will likely get the most work. That energy essay is going to be hard, and I might mostly leave it alone. My upcoming essay is that one, matured by thirteen years or so. I doubt that I will revise the essays written since 2002 much. I'll work on the Dennis essays a little, too. Lots to do.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
28th May 2014, 12:06
Hi:

The edits are beginning to come in, and one area where help is appreciated is organizationally. My style is unique, and while multidisciplinary and covering a lot of territory, organizing it better for the reader is often what the editing process of my writings covers, and my writings have understandably been called "rambling." One pal is reworking the final chapters, trying to extract my experiences from my visions and present them in separate chapters. That is a good idea. It has gotten me thinking about the essay's purpose and the ultimate course of action, and below are my initial thoughts on it.


As I think about the essay’s final chapters, and the problems with previous efforts and what has failed and what might succeed, here is the framework that I will be trying to get across (which is likely obvious, but it might help guide how those final chapters are organized):


1. While there have been many thousands of attempts to make technology that taps the zero-point field and other sources of energy currently not exploited (such as the environmental energy of Dennis’s heat pump (or even getting more energy out of a gallon of gasoline, as Mr. Mentor's engine did and Dennis's final efforts in the USA http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=694872&highlight=wirec#post694872)), few efforts have ever achieved any success, because:


a. The technical effort was underfunded, was often flawed in that it either did not achieve anything that could tap those sources in a significant way, or it succumbed to the vagaries that doom most business efforts (dishonest/greedy associates, inexperience, poor decision-making);

b. If the effort reached a certain level of promise, it was then targeted for organized suppression, which could originate from the local, state, national, or global levels, and many tactics of suppression have been used, from subtle sabotage to billion dollar bribes to seizure under national security laws to media smear campaigns to imprisonment on trumped-up charges to murder; the aspirants' inexperience and naïveté regarding the field of disruptive energy technology made those development and distribution efforts particularly susceptible to suppression efforts, which rarely needed to become overt or severe;

c. There was almost no awareness or support from the public at large, due to:

i. Their unawareness and indifference;

ii. Their manipulation by the social managers (media, law enforcement, educators, "experts," etc.);

iii. Their inability and unwillingness to understand the stakes of the situation, including both the potential of the new energy source and the peril of not acting, so they were easily distracted and led astray;

iv. Greed and fear were the greatest enemies of the public if they became involved, making them susceptible to manipulation;

2. In order to mount an effort that may have a chance of success, the effort needs these qualities:


a. It must be volunteer, non-profit, and transparent, to help prevent the disunities that self-seeking cause;

b. It must have the support of a large enough group that understands the stakes of the issue and is not easily susceptible to organized suppression;

c. The key understandings are far easier achieved if those supporting the effort have some scientific literacy, as well as familiarity with the role of energy in the human journey; they also need to develop something approaching a comprehensive perspective of the situation, so that they are not easily distracted and led astray.


Those attributes are far easier described than achieved, but my essay is about beginning to pursue them. With the essay's publication, the heavy lifting on my end will be finished, and it will be up to those who wish to support the effort to begin doing the work of raising their awareness. I do not kid myself: not many are going to have to the motivation to do so. But with the Internet's reach, those people can be as few as 1-in-100,000, and it will be more than enough for this to work. That is the entire point of what I am doing.

I merely carried Dennis's and Brian's spears, although Dennis says that I also threw a few; maybe so, but I was never the guy on center-stage, being targeted for murder attempts, being incarcerated, and run out of my home nation. It is because I was not surviving murder attempts, being imprisoned, and the like that I have been able to do this work.

I still plan to avoid the fates of people such as Dennis and Brian, and in order to do that, I need others to step up and help shoulder the load. My pals are doing it on the editing front, and those who join the choir will have a great deal of deep work ahead of them. As I am hearing in early returns, my work is not intimidating to the non-scientist, which was one of my primary goals all along.

We will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
28th May 2014, 18:48
Hi:

I am currently re-editing my original energy racket essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm

which will largely be superseded by the upcoming essay, and that essay was largely written in 2001 or 2002. I have done an immense amount of study of that subject matter since then, and as I edit it, I am not cringing. :) It was not too bad.

OK, anecdote time. In my previous post, which described the FE effort that might have a prayer, I mentioned an effort that was non-profit, transparent, and volunteer. I have many reasons for advocating that path, even though to people thinking in "normal" terms, it can seem like a hopeless approach. When I began working for Dennis in 1986:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#hitting

I got one paycheck before they stopped making payroll, but I still busted my tail until the company was stolen a few months later:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#salient1

In less than one year, I went from a stressed-out, unhappy yuppie in LA to a starving but happy revolutionary who chased Dennis out to Boston:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#chasing

But right after the company was stolen, I was getting down there on my funds, and a month later I had to move back in with my grandparents and save up enough money, working for $6 per hour as a temp, until I could chase after Dennis. When the company was stolen, there were about ten "loyalists" with Dennis, and the next day, Dennis talked to us at his home. We were all starving, going months without pay, and Dennis gave a beautiful talk about his vision for the future, but even I almost only had ears for the part where we were going to make money again. I know that kind of pressure all-too-well, and only somebody like Dennis can do what he does, and even people like me cannot ride with him for long.

That entire path, of "when do I make money doing this?" will not work for bringing FE to the world, I am sorry to report. In a normal situation, sure, but there is nothing "normal" about the pursuit of FE. Eliminating that kind of dynamic will go one hell of a long way to making the effort immune to the provocateurs and opportunists, and, believe me, any effort that gains any traction is swarmed by opportunists, Godzilla's minions, a gawking public, and the rest. Making it transparent and non-profit is going to be a key. The transparent part is about open-sourcing anything that is developed, and transparent also means financially transparent and no anonymity. All of those secrecy tactics are antithetical to what I am trying to do, which is why the choir will not have anonymous members in it. They have to reach at least that level of courage. It is really more of a minimum requirement, and if people cannot muster the courage to do that, they will not be able to handle the "curriculum" and future effort.

Back to editing,

Wade

Luciano
29th May 2014, 15:31
Hello Bill and Wade!

I would like to know what you guys think about the KESHE´S TECNOLOGY?


Regards

Wade Frazier
29th May 2014, 16:42
Hi Luciano:

See this:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

Thanks,

Wade

Wade Frazier
29th May 2014, 16:48
Hi:

The last four chapters of my essay are going to be reorganized a little. My Fifth Epochal Event chapter looks like this at present.

Best,

Wade


Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes (the effect begins to appear at about 2,000 RPMs in properly constructed devices), but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any FE device contest. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem may also have been solved, and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid-state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed vast amounts of energy to operate. FE and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity?

The appearance of FE would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on FE could look like, as well as its impact on Earth and the solar system.



Immediate Material Changes

The immediate material changes would push both humanity and Earth's ecosystems back from the brink of destruction that they currently sit on, and this section explores some of those changes.

1. The immediate effect of FE technology would be the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy would quickly become archaic and rarely done. Some applications may need a flame, and for such situations, burning hydrogen would seem ideal, as water is split to make it, and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end.

2. Burning fossil fuels causes most air pollution, including acid rain. Virtually all air pollution would immediately disappear. Global respiratory problems would largely cease, as would stress on trees and other plant life, which makes them susceptible to diseases and is killing off forests today and acidifying the oceans.

3. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. There are even mainstream organizations devoted today to that issue, but they usually need to burn fossil fuels to get the energy to extract carbon dioxide, which partly defeats the purpose. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere. The same could be easily done for methane, artificial chemicals, and the like.

4. Humanity’s water-use practices are currently unsustainable, with water tables plunging worldwide, largely due to over-pumping for irrigation. It is creating widespread environmental devastation, including soil salination. With FE, intelligently implemented, environmentally harmless desalination plants could exist in the oceans, desalinating ocean water and pumping it to land. The most enlightened first use is filling back up the depleted water tables. The two biggest killers of children worldwide today are polluted water and air. Although the World Bank and IMF are behind privatizing the world’s water supplies, even in the United States, which has led to disease outbreaks already among the poor, desalinated water would also make universally free and pure water available to all humans.

5. Mining on Earth would largely disappear, and whatever continued would have no environmental impact. One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future. With FE and antigravity technologies, those asteroids would be easily mined and their results brought to Earth or used for colonies around the solar system.

6. Every use of wood today can be replaced with FE, and even the land used for forests would not be needed, and the forests can all grow back, even “farmed” by enlightened humans. The practice of using wood for energy, or any other use, would immediately vanish.

7. In 2007, it was calculated that humanity was harvesting Earth’s ecosystems at a rate of 150% of their productivity. In financial terms, that is called eating into the capital, not living on the interest. The most dramatic change that FE will have on Earth is that humans will no longer exploit ecosystems to survive and humanity can even live abundantly with no harm to Earth's ecosystems. At Japanese rice farmer levels of productivity, an American suburban yard could provide the food for the family that lives in the house. Imagine an indoor environment that can be as hot, cold, light, dark, wet, or dry as desired, and however much water and other nutrients were needed were freely available. Growing racks could be stacked three high or more, for example, with continual lighting, and food productivity under those conditions could reduce that food footprint to the “basement” of the spacious home sitting atop it. Would the family want to raise tropical fruits? Root crops? Seed crops? Fruit and nut trees? The septic system could be made to recycle the sewage into clean nutrients for crops. Water could be continually recycled, beginning each cycle with distilled-level purity. A completely self-contained family living system could be readily developed, and it would contain “luxuries” scarcely imaginable today. It could also be self-contained regarding its gases, constantly recycled. It is not much of a leap to quickly approach something like the replicators on Star Trek, where mass is continually being recycled, with energy added and the elements recombined in useful ways. The food-to-waste-to-food cycle is how our ecosystems operate, with the Sun’s energy adding the needed boost.

8. Oil spills, the environmental devastation of oil drilling and nuclear accidents, coal mining, deforestation, and other effects of humanity's energy-acquisition practices would immediately cease.



Cognitive and Social Changes

Just as with humanity's previous epochal events, the energy event, which was the epochal event, initiated great cognitive and social changes. As the level of energy production with FE would dwarf all previous levels, the cognitive and social changes would also be unprecedented and radical, and this section explores some of them.

1. FE would mean the end of economic desperation for all peoples for all time. The entire human journey has been about the acquisition, preservation, and consumption of energy, and the supply has always been scarce or finite, a paradigm has accompanied the human journey for the past 10,000 years or more, one I have called the Zero-Sum Game. It is the idea that the only way to improve one's station in life is by exploiting others. No other event could help shatter the illusion of scarcity and the Zero-Sum-Game paradigm better than FE. If people begin seeing beyond the Zero-Sum-Game blinders, vistas scarcely imagined today can be glimpsed.

2. Many concepts used today to describe economic and environmental reality will be superseded. One is called the carbon footprint, which is a result of burning hydrocarbons to get our energy. That will become immediately anachronistic and meaningless. There are similar “footprint” concepts, such as the footprint that humanity has on Earth’s ecosystems.

3. Economic motives have always been at the root of all wars, and Fuller noted the same motivation behind all soldiers. Even one of Hitler’s henchmen observed how any society can be motivated to war by fear, so why would wars break out when everybody lived in abundance? There are some legitimate transition fears, and I advocate a global peacekeeping force, ideally staffed with grandmothers, who would ensure that the transition to a world based on abundance was not marred by warfare. Today, the GCs can detect when anybody accesses the zero-point field, and weaponization of FE technology could probably be detected and just as easily disabled. I would happily deputize grandmothers to take the toys away from the boys who cannot seem to play nicely, until the utter stupidity of such behavior becomes universally obvious and nobody needs to be reminded anymore. I envision a solar-system-wide government forming, but its only charges would be safety, ensuring that everybody had life’s necessities, and promoting a dynamic unity among all peoples. It would be a government based on love and abundance, not fear and scarcity. That government will not be about amassing power, catering to economic elites, defending borders, and playing the adolescent games that we see on today’s world stage.

4. Today’s organized religions will all become obsolete, as the roots of religion were based in winning wars, and today’s religions are all priesthood-serving distortions of valid perceptions of spiritual masters. They have all waned in influence with industrialization, and when abundance reigns instead of scarcity, no enlightened ideas will be distorted into methods of social control and supporting economic rackets. There will be spiritual practices, but they will not rest on the violence-, fear-, and scarcity-based foundations of today’s religions.

5. There would not be punitive legal systems and prisons, but justice and healing would always be the goal. What today are called “criminals” would be recognized as sick people in need of help, not punishment. The most recalcitrant might be sequestered from society, but placed in environments of healing and education, not punishment. Criminal mentalities would not last long, either, nor could they be successfully hidden as they are today. The innumerable secret games being played today will largely vanish, and almost nobody would see the point of playing them. Abundance would make many behaviors called “human nature” today simply disappear.

6. The invader mentality would disappear from human consciousness as economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. When the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes obsolete, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only those with the most primitive mentalities engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not welcome us, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those earlier European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we were not wanted. The short-term effect of making and distributing FE machines would be a global economic boom and redistribution of wealth of unprecedented proportion. While there would be short-term “losers,” the same awakening that would manifest the possibilities of FE can also bring to awareness the need to lessen the short-term discomfort of those relying on fossil fuel revenues. No human would need to suffer in the transition to a world economy based on FE.

7. As further discussed below, elites will become obsolete, as will ideas of rich, poor, and middle class. Elites appeared with civilization, and they will disappear with the arrival of FE, which is largely why they have been preventing FE's public dissemination.

8. The reasons for cities to appear were ease of communication and social interaction, and the surplus energy delivered from the hinterland to urban environments allowed for the specialization that led to professions. The energetic exploitation of a hinterland and low energy transportation lanes to deliver it made cities possible. With the ability to travel and communicate anywhere on Earth nearly instantly, and with the myriad problems of urban civilization, who would want to live cheek-by-jowl in cities? With the kinds of lifestyles made possible by those technologies, nobody I know would choose to live in a city. Urban environments would likely become obsolete, or the function of what remained would radically change. There will be social gatherings, perhaps large ones, and there might be something resembling factories, farms, offices, and the like, but there would not be any reason to cram them together, as energy scarcity underlies most urban features (low-energy transportation lanes, high-density dwellings at the end of those lanes). A modern city is essentially a huge, energy-concentrating device, where the energy efficiencies of centralized production, distribution, and consumption are critical features which become meaningless in an FE-based world.

9. With the appearance of FE and related technologies, all human needs would be easily met with almost no human effort. Think of the “workday” of an average adult being about an hour, to provide all of humanity’s necessities at a standard of living that makes Bill Gates appear a pauper. Just as the world’s richest man in 1700 lived a primitive life compared to the average American, in an FE-based economy, future generations will marvel that the world’s richest man in 2000 never even left his home planet, like some galactic bumpkin. Instead of riding hundreds of energy slaves, each human would ride thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even more. In our scarcity-based world, the idea of all humans having their basic needs met is decried as “socialism” and worse, but if all of humanity could almost effortlessly be fed, housed, and clothed, and transportation and communication were also easily accomplished, why would anybody be denied on the basis of someone else’s greed? That is the case today, with the games that the elites play, but this chapter is about imagining that that initial hurdle was cleared. All of the world’s nations, other than the USA, have long advocated that food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education should be universal human rights. The only nation that officially vetoed that idea is history’s richest and most powerful. What is wrong with that picture?

10. The concept of nations will be among the first ideas to become obsolete, as will all such territorial ideologies. Other dramatic changes in humanity will happen that may not be obvious at first. Humanity’s races are the result of evolution, where geographic isolation and environmental adaption have led to incipient speciation, and hair, skin, and eye color are superficial changes. All human races can interbreed, and when geographic isolation ends with a humanity that can easily travel throughout the solar system, not only will racism end, but so will race. There will be only one race, probably within a few hundred years after FE appears, and racism is already under siege in nations such as the USA, and racism, along with all such “isms,” always had an economic rationale that elevated one group at the expense of others. All of those scarcity-based systems, judgments, and ideologies will quickly become senseless, just as so many others have during the course of human civilization. Just as the races are a product of geographic and genetic isolation that will disappear as the isolation does, humanity will likely use only one language. As with disappearing races, the process of languages disappearing will likely take centuries. Maybe something like Esperanto will rise again, or a lingua franca such as English will persist for a time (and computer-based language translation is increasingly common and sophisticated), but eventually one language will unify humanity. Science has been called a universal language, but the universal conversational language will likely resemble an English/Chinese blend or something similar. All human languages are UP’s languages, so that universal language will be easily learned by all. Maybe some “mother tongues” will survive, or a few languages will survive, with them being used for various disciplines (one being more scientific, while another is more social/mystical in nature, and so on), but I doubt they will survive for long.

11. Professions involved in exchange will all become pointless in a world of economic abundance, which include accountants, cashiers, lawyers, police, and soldiers. Entire industries, such as banking and insurance, will disappear. Politicians will largely cease to exist, especially those on today’s world stage, who are puppets of economic interests. Even seemingly worthwhile professions are largely rackets, such as Western medicine. With most people performing intrinsically worthless activities, what will happen when such professions and industries disappear? Will everybody just lie around, watch TV, and get fat? I doubt it. I do not have enough years in my lifetime to get my life list done. If people think about all the activities that are designed to relieve stress, cope with fear, and the like, many less-obvious activities will also fade to oblivion. In that world, which sources I respect have described in other star systems, time spent “working” is called “joy time,” as beings are fulfilled as they contribute to their civilizations in a meaningful way, they do it by using their particular talents, and there is no such thing as drudgery. Also, the idea of competition will likely vanish, as will the “entertainments” that enthrall so many today, such as sports, competitive games, beauty competitions, and the like. “Entertainment” with winners and losers will no longer be attractive, rooted as it is in ideas of scarcity, and celebrity culture and gossip will also be discarded. All such primitive behaviors and ideals will fade away, and they will not be missed.

12. Numbers and measurement will still exist, but egocentric economics that focuses on money and self-interest to the exclusion of all else will disappear, as will anthropocentric economics, where ecosystem health is only seen in terms of how it can support human welfare. The economic view that will supersede those frameworks is what I call life-centric or soul-centric, and it measures and values the wellbeing of all life on Earth, not just human welfare.

13. Humanity seems to be an intelligent, sentient species. Ending the Zero-Sum Game can also end the lives of quiet desperation that most people lead, and help open their hearts, which will also unleash the potential of their minds. Today, there is a system designed to purposely dumb people down, but if they begin waking up, those games will end. Human intelligence in the service of an awakened heart is a force that most people today cannot imagine; with the awakening that FE can catalyze, intelligence and imagination can be used as never before.

With the end of the Zero-Sum Game, people can also began thinking about how they can reduce the harm their existence causes others, which leads to the longer-term possibilities.



Longer-Term Changes

The rise of the human species was dependent on exploiting new energy sources by using intelligence and manipulative ability. The new paradigm can be catalyzed by FE (there is nothing else more likely to do it, or so close to becoming reality), and then intelligence and manipulative ability in the service of a healed heart can create a future that is difficult to imagine. Pondering the possibilities of FE since 1986 has led to many realizations for me, and this section is devoted to exploring some of the possibilities that could come to pass in my lifetime, if FE became publicly available.

1. Humans have been able to artificially reproduce manipulative ability and intelligence. Reproducing manipulative ability began with the era of machines, and the reproduction of intelligence began with the computer age. Both ages are still in their infancies. Most mainstream environmentalists have austere solutions to humanity’s energy issues, such as riding bicycles. FE can blast those austere blinders to shreds, and should. With love, intelligence and manipulative ability can rise to currently undreamed-of levels, and can begin approaching that heavenly future that can await most of us, if we want it. I am a believer in computers, especially their potential when wedded with machines. Popping the Zero-Sum-Game paradigm also will unleash amazing levels of genius that exist today, but are suppressed in the name of greed. Robotics is in its infancy, and developed to a high level in the above-top-secret world, and FE, machines, and intelligence can create marvels that today’s science-fiction authors can barely imagine. Today’s scientists are able to manipulate material at the atomic level as they make computer chips ever smaller and faster, while our energy production methods are not far removed from the cave days. That contrast is one of many mind-bogglers in today’s world, and could spur people to begin thinking about what is wrong with that picture; with the increase in robotics sophistication, no human need toil on behalf of another, unless that is what they want to do.

2. Another of humanity’s tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but nearly everything else would be cleaned up.

3. Cleaning up human space junk would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets. It may be decided that the entire asteroid belt should be consolidated into one “planet” that can be mined for raw materials when needed. It would be less than a twentieth of our Moon’s mass.

4. With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas that Brian O'Leary and others advocated can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of spaceships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples.

5. For those who fear skies filled with colliding craft: that will not happen. The days of human-piloted craft are quickly coming to an end. By 2012, automobiles without drivers had logged a half million kilometers of driving the USA’s highways without incident, and self-driving cars being sold by the early 2020s are predicted. By the time that antigravity craft are made for public use, I would expect that they are all computer-piloted. When I have floated these ideas past people, some who even call themselves visionaries, the immediate reaction is almost always fearful, imagining all that could go wrong, before they even think about the benefits. That is a universal problem that I will address later.

6. Just as humanity can clean up its space junk, all of the insults that humans, particularly industrialized humans, have inflicted on Earth can also be remediated as among FE’s first applications. There are floating garbage patches in the world’s oceans, primarily comprised of plastic. That could be easily cleaned up, mostly with automated equipment, and is another temporary assignment that I would happily volunteer for. The entire concept of disposable plastics that enter the environment would be rethought and redesigned. All landfills, waste dumps, mine tailings, and the like would be recycled into their constituent elements or made harmless, and all of Earth’s environments would be restored. With FE and related technologies, those tasks would be easily completed.

7. With FE, a new paradigm of chemistry can appear. Most substances used to clean things, such as chlorine in the water supply, laundry detergent and other soaps, bleach and other household cleaners, can be replaced with hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, and ozone. Those three chemicals “deteriorate" into water and oxygen. They are infinitely recyclable and of zero environmental impact, and they are creatable in virtually infinite amounts with FE; a primary reason today’s toxic agents are used is that they are chemically persistent. Chlorine in the water will stay there, killing microorganisms, with FE, ozone could be continually created and put into water. The USA's government demanded that ozone purification replace chlorine purification, creating the same effect without the persistent poison in it. Even that is an intermediary vision (desalination distillation can leapfrog the whole issue). The basics of using hydrogen peroxide, oxygen and ozone is simply using FE to increase the electrons’ energy, and using it for cleaning purposes. Such a practice would introduce zero pollution and keep human environments spotlessly clean and non-toxic. There are new horizons of chemistry that await the awakening that FE can help catalyze, and go far beyond cleaning agents.

8. Industrialized peoples need to reconnect with nature, and a great beginning is to start having a hand in raising the food they eat, and raising it in their homes is one way. My ultimate eating experience has always been eating fruit off the tree and berries off the bush. Not only is it how we lived in the tropical forests, no food has ever tasted better or been better for us. The American food supply is degenerate on several levels, and locally grown fruit, harvested by those who eat it (or getting it the same day or week it was picked) can go a long way toward not only improving humanity’s health, but also reconnecting minds and spirits with nature, to begin seeing the world with healthy eyes and hearts. If land-farming becomes viewed as primitive, seen about as stone tools are today, and we can get all of our raw materials from around the solar system and easily manipulate them for our use, why would we ever again harm the fragile ecosystem that was our original home? Those kinds of practices would quickly be seen as primitive and born of desperation, and will be universally abandoned. Under an FE-based economy, eating animal flesh will likely be seen as unnecessary, primitive, and barbaric, and would soon end. Similarly, drugs and other inebriants are all brief escapes from misery, and when everybody’s standard of living leaps upward by a few orders of magnitude, the desire for inebriants will decline and likely vanish.

9. Forests are largely responsible for the existence of today’s land-based life. With FE and the materials revolution, the uses of wood for fuel and buildings would disappear. It would also disappear for furniture. Already, America is on the brink of eliminating paper for printing information. I rarely use my computer’s printer anymore, and read everything on my computer. Words can be on computer screens, LCD tablets that look like books; projected onto sunglasses, walls and even the retina. They can even be spoken aloud by voice generation; with just a little ingenuity, we could eliminate paper for information transmission. All plant fiber is simply water and air that photosynthesis turned into cellulose; all animal fibers such as wool are other transformations of sunlight. Already, synthetic fibers have eliminated much of the need for using cellulose and animal fiber; some organic fiber can still have some use, but could be provided by cotton or hemp, grown in those indoor environments; there could still be some use for wood, but it can be taken from newly dead trees, in environmentally harmless fashion. With the exotic materials that I am aware of in the GCs' Golden Hoard, I doubt that materials made from living organisms will ever be needed again, and would soon be seen as barbaric as slavery. Even toilet paper can be replaced by laser-guided warm water, perhaps with a little hydrogen peroxide or other sterilizing agent present (and a blow dryer!). That would not be much of a technical feat, in light of these other dynamics. In short, every use of wood, paper and organic fibers could become largely obsolete, and humans would not even need the land the forests stood on for their energy needs. Then forests could become what they used to be; homes for forest denizens and places for humans to recreate.

In summary, a world without environmental destruction and poverty would quickly come to pass with the most basic of technologies that I know exist. But what may challenge most of today’s minds are the many features of today’s civilization that will quickly become archaic, viewed as slavery and gladiator “games” are today.

A key aspect of civilization that will disappear with the release of those technologies is the same aspect that is suppressing them; with economic abundance, elites will become obsolete. Elites have always been economic elites above all else, and all elites for all time have engaged in conspicuous economic consumption as the mark of their status. Slavery appeared with civilization and disappeared with industrialization. Elites appeared with civilization and will disappear with the Fifth Epochal Event, which is why ultra-elites have worked so hard to prevent it. They see their very existence being at stake. For most “normal” people, that can seem a bizarre view, but ultra-elites are addicted to political power and their ability to rule an entire planet, and imposing fear and scarcity are their primary methods of maintaining their position. While each industrialized human rides hundreds of energy slaves, ultra-elites see themselves as riding billions of actual slaves. Many of them will not willingly relinquish their position, even if the planet is made uninhabitable as a consequence. Fortunately, even most ultra-elites realize the insanity of that position, and cooler heads may prevail. Instead of ruling in hell, elites will become regular members of something that resembles heaven on Earth.

Today, capitalist interests have turned industrial waste into “medicine” and concocted other Big Lies that the public has swallowed whole. Greed and other deadly sins have been turned into virtues in our crazed world. If abundance comes to pass, if a practice is discovered to be harmful, then it will be abandoned and a harmless method will be developed and implemented. What will not happen is that those “invested” in the harmful practice will brainwash the public, with compliant “scientists” who have sold their souls, to turn poison into medicine, call addictive junk food (that capitalizes on the evolutionary energetic adaptation to prefer sweet and fatty foods) nutritious, and the many other evil practices that parade today as beneficial or benign. Without huge capitalistic interest involved (the GCs are capitalism on steroids), which are only concerned with profit, those kinds of practices will end.

The human nuclear family was a change from ape social organization, giving more males an opportunity to procreate, but it is also an economic institution, as have been extended families and the like. Family and clan organization began to disappear with the first cities in Sumer. What will happen to family structures with FE and abundance? Bearing children is hard on a woman, and it is difficult to imagine a population explosion with FE and abundance, as women will have better things to do than become baby factories. Maybe the human population will significantly decline in a continuance of today’s demographic transition, but even if it rose, since humanity will not place a burden on Earth’s ecosystems, it would not matter like it does today.

Humans can radically alter the course of life on Earth, even more so than we already have. Artificial selection has proven to be far more powerful than natural selection, and with the human ability to alter its environment, natural selection itself could become largely irrelevant where humanity is concerned. I will return to this subject soon, but while those ideas can seem to encourage megalomania, it could also point the way to horizons that we can scarcely imagine, that do not have to become Blade Runner-ish nightmares.

As my fellow travelers and I have pursued FE, the nearly universal reactions to our efforts were denial and fear, which often led to us being attacked. Denial is a fear reaction, so we always found the barrier to be fear. If people got past denial and fear of “unexpected outcomes,” then greed usually destroyed the efforts. Greed is the fear of never having enough, so once again, fear defeated the effort. Those reactions usually happened long before organized suppression was applied. When the agents of organized suppression arrived, they almost effortlessly defeated the efforts by using people’s fear and greed against them. When I saw it happen the first few times, I initially refused to believe it. We made the GCs’ task easy. They easily turned my own mother against me. The opposite of fear is love, which has always been the crux of this conundrum and will be addressed later. This chapter is about what life looks like after we get over the hump; I honor some fears, but they can be addressed.

Darwin began his Origin of the Species with describing the evolutionary effects of domestication. Humans have already created unprecedented evolutionary trends, and a prominent speculation among scientists is that humans have domesticated themselves and genes for the bellicosity of warfare, for instance, may be getting culled from the human gene pool. With industrialization, violence has been proportionally diminished, and may be on its way to dying out. The entire dominance model of human relations will likely become a relic of our primitive heritage.

During the history of life on Earth and the human journey, there were many golden ages, where energy was relatively abundant, whether it was new ecological niches with few competitors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14), “virgin” continents awaiting the “settlers,” (1, 2, 3), or the early days of exploiting a new energy source (1, 2, 3, 4), but the good times ended as others arrived to take their share of the energy or the energy source was depleted. If there is more potential energy in one cubic centimeter of “empty” space than scientists think exists in the entire visible universe, when do you think that energy will run out? For all practical human purposes, the energy would be inexhaustible. Michio Kaku has popularized the idea of galactic civilizations ranked on levels of energy usage, and under that scale, humanity has not yet reached the first level. An FE-based civilization would probably rank as a Type 1. I am not too interested in humanity becoming a Type 2 or Type 3 civilization, and maybe none exist in our universe. Those can seem like rather pompous ideas to today’s humans. Taking care of our own planet and fellow creatures is enough challenge for our species for the foreseeable future. I would happily settle for humans just learning those lessons for the next million years or so, before embarking on anything more ambitious. Humanity is not yet toilet-trained as a species, and reaching that galactically modest level is what the work of FE activists I respect has generally been devoted toward. Anything beyond that will be a bonus and far into the future.

There is a great deal of evidence, nearly all of it suppressed, that we are not alone in the universe. It is being suppressed for the same reason that FE, antigravity, and myriad other technologies are being suppressed: so that the ultra-elites can continue sitting upon their perch atop the global food chain. The issues are deeply related, and either situation overcoming the organized suppression will likely resolve the other almost instantaneously, and they might happen at the same moment. Although the Brookings Institute advised NASA for caution regarding any ET disclosures, the days of a War of the Worlds reaction are long gone. Knowing that we are not alone in the universe, and that our journey may have been significantly influenced by ET visitors (such as the velocity of today’s technological revolution), will change humanity’s self-image and likely the way that we end up interacting with galactic civilizations, but that will all pale beside the economic and social changes that FE, antigravity, and related technologies will initiate. That is all unexplored territory that I, for one, look forward to wandering.

All of today’s dominant ideologies will become obsolete in a world where abundance reigns, and all abundance notions have to be based on energy abundance above all else. If energy is not abundant, none of the abundance ideas put forth by various visionaries have much hope of coming to fruition.

The ideas presented in this chapter can be seen as vague ideas, if the Fifth Epochal Event happens. I can no more predict the specific outcomes of the Fifth Epochal Event than that English peasant of 1500 could predict the end of slavery, the invention of the Internet, the demographic transition, the liberation of women, Hollywood, nuclear weapons, or rockets to the moon.

However, for this Epochal Event, unlike the others, we actually have some hints of what might lie ahead, and Star Trek provides one such vision of a potential future. One set of noteworthy visions comes from Michael Roads's Into a Timeless Realm, which is particularly inspiring. Roads visited two future human realities, about 300 years into our future. They were on opposite ends of the fear/love spectrum. Both were technologically advanced compared to today and both had genetic engineering, but the fear-dominated reality made Blade Runner’s Los Angeles seem like Disneyland, while a Disney movie could not begin to depict the love-based one. Visions like that make it clear to me that our future will be what we make it. What we choose to do, today, determines what our tomorrow looks like. The fear-based world was filled with victims, from top to bottom, while those in that other world all acted like true creators, and creators create with love. Love has always been the answer, and learning that lesson may be the reason why we are here, playing this life-on-Earth game.

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 00:49
Hi:

As I have been playing the editing game, interacting with my pals, and hearing from new players to my game, I find myself reflecting on what I am doing and what my goals are. A healed planet and humanity is my ultimate goal, and FE has always been the ingredient that trumps all else. Scientists not in denial of FE (there are some! :) ) understand this quite well, and I have found that scientists usually like my work more than any other group that I have encountered. I think it probably has to do with the attention span that doing science and digesting my work takes.

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the beginning of my energy journey, and I know that manifesting the biggest event in the human journey will be a long, slow process, at least on the scale of an individual lifetime. On the geologic timescale, it is happening in the blink of an eye. I find myself resisting attempts by people trying to popularize my work. While it is available to anybody, it is designed for deep thinkers, and there are not many of those in today's world on the FE issue, where the flavor of the day, the inventor of the hour, and the like dominates this subject matter.

I probably cannot escape continually reliving my days with Dennis, and not because I want to, but because I keep doing this work, and it constantly comes up. People really have to see Dennis in action to believe it. He is a combination of Indiana Jones, P.T. Barnum, a revivalist minister, and a business Einstein, all wrapped up in one. When I saw him last year, his wife and I whiled away the afternoon until Dennis got home from work, and Dennis was 67 at the time. She was amazed at how much energy he still has (she told it to me along the lines of, "You may be expecting that all that Dennis has been through finally took its toll, but he is still going as hard as ever, and I do not know how he does it, either."). He really is one of the wonders of the world.

The first interview I gave was in 2003, and I have kept in touch with the interviewer, who traveled the world for many years, seeking visionaries. I once asked him what they all had in common, and he said high intelligence and high energy, with their hearts being in the right place a given.

When a true visionary comes into contact with FE, everything else pales to insignificance, and their universal initial reaction is to see the Fifth Epochal Event laid out before them, and they want to tell others about it. I am not sure that I have seen somebody who began to understand not do that. But, in every instance that I am aware of, when they tried to spread the idea, they were humored, ignored, attacked, ridiculed, ostracized, and the like. That just comes with the territory. :) Brian's question, after playing the Paul Revere of FE for five years, of whether humanity is really a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

is a classic reaction to trying to spread the news, and I hear from FE newbies all the time, after they tried spreading the news. If they really understand the FE message as presented by people like Brian and me, they will come to realize that they are all alone in the daily lives, with nobody else interested. It is a lonely feeling, I can tell you. And that is if they are fortunate. I have seen plenty of reactions where people lost friendships, family relationships, and even careers as they tried spreading the good news. Anymore, I usually dissuade readers from turning on their pals to my work. Or if they do, they should just send them a link and then stand back. If they do not see recognition and deeper probing of my work, they should just leave them be. Pressing my kind of work on people is when their reactions can get violent, as their defense mechanisms kick in.

As I have laid out the changes that the other epochal events created in the human journey:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827022&viewfull=1#post827022

it was clear that nobody could have predicted what was coming. The resistance to the idea of FE and abundance is a similar dynamic. The vast majority of humanity will not begin to understand until FE is delivered to their homes, and that is OK. I am looking for less than 1-in-1,000 in the general population, and it is likely more like 1-in-10,000, but that is a hundred times as many as I will need to make this work.

Seth once said that combined intention by people in full awareness, acting as sovereign individuals, is the most powerful force of change on Earth, and I believe it. That is what I am shooting for, and for people to reach the level of awareness that will be needed for making an FE choir happen, they will have to do the work, and that takes a long time. Getting into the saddle with somebody like Dennis is a good way to learn it fast, but almost nobody survives those lessons. If somebody has had an awakening experience, where work like mine begins to make sense to them, I estimate that it would take several years of study and reflection for it to really sink in. Shifting one's internal paradigm from scarcity to abundance, from fear to love, is not easy on today's Earth. Trying to live it is the hard part, but just being able to imagine it is also very hard, and those who join the choir will have made that transition in their minds. That is far, far harder than it might seem. Heck, I am constantly having to be vigilant myself, noticing where scarcity has lodged itself in my awareness and dealing with it. I doubt that the vigilance ever ends, at least in the epoch of scarcity.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 06:41
Hi:

This process is bringing me into contact with some interesting people, and some are highly accomplished. For better or worse, I am definitely hearing that there is nobody else on Earth today doing what I am. While that might feel "nice," it is also part of that lonely feeling, and it puts pressure on me to do my best to get this right. I am currently feeling very happy that I have been able to get this done on my own terms. It has not been easy, as plenty of slings and arrows came my way as I was writing it, but the end is in sight, and it will get done in a way that is close to how I envisioned it. I could not ask for more.

I'll say this: so many of the adventures in my life were not planned, but just happened, often enough with that voice in my head leading me along, and other preposterous events. While the essay has likely been gestating ever since 2003, when I encountered Bucky's work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

the path to writing the essay was anything but straight, and joining Avalon, in retrospect, was a key catalyst to doing it. Thanks to the forum for all the fun and games for the past few years. Bill gets big points.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 16:58
Hi:

I have been editing like a madman, and the last several chapters of the essay received a pretty major reorganization that is almost finished. Essentially, I took my experiences, and those of Dennis, Brian, Greer, and other fellow travelers, and put them into a new chapter that immediately precedes the Fifth Epochal Event chapter. That new chapter looks like this. I will also present what the final chapter looks like before long, maybe this weekend.

Best,

Wade


My Adventures and Those of My Fellow Travelers

In this essay’s first chapter, I reviewed my journey and touched on Dennis Lee’s, who was my partner during my days of pursuing FE, and that chapter also mentioned Brian O’Leary’s amazing explorations. This chapter will dig a little deeper into our experiences. Our odysseys into alternative and eventually free energy all began at about the same time: in 1973-1974, during the USA’s first energy crisis, which ended the USA's poswar boom. Mine started when my first professional mentor invented what was hailed as the world’s best engine for powering an automobile, which he invented just before the crisis, and which caused great commotion within the federal government. During the furor, I had my mystical awakening, spent two months in Europe absorbing its art and culture, and began dreaming of changing the energy industry. Dennis is twelve years older than me, and as I was dreaming of changing the energy industry, he was having his first company destroyed in the energy crisis's mayhem. Brian began his alternative energy pursuit around the same time, as he engaged in Capitol Hill activism and advised presidential candidates.

Dennis was raised as a poor rural white of Scots-Irish heritage, growing up as a migrant farm worker, when white people still did that in the USA. He left home at age 13 because his family could no longer afford to feed him, and his journey took him to Vietnam in 1968, as a medic who saw combat. Not long after his Vietnam experience, Dennis had his mystical awakening in an event far more dramatic than mine, when he heard a voice in his head that he calls “God.” Several years later, as I had my first existential crisis and prayed for guidance, I too heard a voice, which changed my studies from science to business. Several years after that, I prayed for guidance for the second and so far last time in my life. The voice again responded and suggested that I move far away, and I immediately landed in the midst of Dennis’s company. I heard from that voice one more time, that time unbidden, and do not want to hear from it anymore. I have no idea who or what the voice was, but it had an omniscience that I sure do not possess. Even though I have not asked for that voice again and have not heard it, while I wrote this essay, I can tell that my “friends” have been orchestrating my life’s events once again. Such events are not uniformly unpleasant, but they usually challenge me in uncomfortable ways which seem to come with the territory. While I have never heard of any other FE attempts having such preposterous levels of otherworldly “intervention,” efforts like ours have often been accompanied by similar incidents. We all lose any beliefs that we might have had in coincidence.

All of those hard-to-believe events aside, I became a student of genius, learning at my first professional mentor’s knee. While it was the great integrity that Dennis displayed as his Seattle company was being destroyed that sold me on him (as well as that voice leading me to him), when I chased him to Boston to help rebuild his effort, it quickly became evident that I was learning from another world-class genius, and I avidly studied his efforts. He probably did his most interesting work before I met him. He invented the energy industry’s first shared savings program, and his marketing programs were awe-inspiring. Dennis was an untrained businessman, but his ability to erect a disruptive energy technology company with no capital and create the entire process, from developing the technology to building it, marketing it, and installing it, is the best that I have ever seen or heard of, and his public image rarely even touched upon his unparalleled talent in that area. Yet those abilities paled beside his other qualifications, which nobody else that I know of has matched. That voice knew what it was doing in leading me to Dennis, but being Indiana Jones’s sidekick was not an easy ride, and I have generally rejected Dennis’s entreaties to rejoin him after I helped free him from jail. Even as I write this, our story seems ridiculously fanciful, but it all happened and more, with connections and events I am not at liberty to publicly disclose that makes Indiana Jones’s journey resemble Walter Mitty’s. As dramatic as those events were, our focus was always on bringing FE to the world.

In Boston, we were still recovering from our Seattle effort when we were offered $10 million for Dennis’s initial idea for making FE. Although Dennis began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received that first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, just before we were wiped out, Dennis received an offer of about $1 billion to fold our operation, delivered by a CIA man who said that he represented “European interests.” It became obvious that we had attracted the attention of the people who ran the world, although the group has apparently split along factional lines, with us hearing from the "good guys" periodically. Soon after Dennis rejected the offer, our nightmare truly began, as we were taken out in one of the most spectacular snuff jobs in the entire history of FE attempts. When the dust settled a couple of years later, my life was shattered, I was radicalized, and I would never again see the world the same way. My partner who helped me free Dennis from jail had his life wrecked and shortened. The carnage spread far and wide, with distantly peripheral players having their lives wrecked, and heard sad stories from participants even as I was wrote this essay.

To trip the light fantastic, back in those days, members of that disenchanted ultra-elite faction gave a close friend a demonstration of some of their hoarded technologies. However, the dark heart of that organization is as black as a moonless midnight in the mountains, and in my circles it is known that one crazed ultra-elite contingency plan is terraforming Mars if Earth’s surface becomes uninhabitable. Sanity may prevail, but I will not idly hope for the best.

When Dennis and I began our FE efforts, we were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. Probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla and really did not know that there was an FE field, but we began hearing about it soon enough, as people approached us with hair-raising tales of woe. Their stories were not only about FE, but any technologies that various oligarchies believed threatened their rackets, from high-MPG cars to windmill farms to innovate mining techniques to even low-water toilets. We heard of FE inventors having their entire families murdered, with their homes burned down and bulldozed, inventors thrown in jail on the flimsiest pretexts and many other outrages, primarily occurring in the USA, the Land of the Free. It began to become monotonous.

As Dennis and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, Brian was exploring the frontiers of science. When Brian taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third was that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. Brian’s work was some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

After his establishment days ended, Brian not only investigated FE technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon and subsequently nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military. Like us, Brian began waking up fast. The year after leaving my home town, where my life was wrecked, I met Brian while he was traveling the world, investigating FE efforts, which resulted in his Miracle in the Void, published in late 1995. I became attracted to Brian’s work when I read, for the first time that I could recall, somebody in the FE field writing about Dennis without lying about him. Brian then embarked on a journey of playing the Paul Revere of FE, and for five years he rode, and he access to the highest levels of the world's scientific, environmental, and related institutions. Brian beseeched his peers to simply entertain the idea of FE.

I eventually carried Brian's spears, and they were fortunately much lighter than Dennis’s. In 2001, as we were being run out of town when trying to interest California's governor in alternative energy, as Enron was raping California, which caused the governor to lose his job, Brian told me how his ride as Paul Revere went: he openly wondered if humanity was a sentient species, as all he received were crazed reactions of denial and fear. I sadly understood his query. It was a fair question, and forms the crux of the FE conundrum. During that same conversation, when I told Brian about that exotic technology show that my close friend received, his response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (not many survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain. Everybody that I most respected in the FE and related milieus began their journeys as overgrown Boy Scouts, not rebels.

While the media had libeled Dennis since I met him, what initially shocked me as I became aware of the FE field was that leading voices in the FE field also libeled Dennis. They were not little white lies, but Big Lies that served as centerpieces of their attacks. When the libelers were confronted with their lies, sometimes by me, they either gave the challengers the finger or made up more lies. I also watched big names in the field eagerly embrace the libelers and their lies while they attacked Dennis and Brian. They essentially acted like the psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll who were sicced on us over the years. Those behaviors only reinforced the primary lesson of my journey, and provided more evidence that the enemy is us. Probably more disconcerting was FE enthusiasts presenting me one libel tract in particular as an example of great writing about the FE issue (!). That libel tract has been presented to me around twenty times.

I always respected Dennis and Brian the most in the FE field, and I valued their integrity above all else. Their great hearts attracted me to them, not their talent, genius, or fame. I have written plenty about my days with Dennis and Brian, and interested readers can discover more if they wish. I hope to convey what the learning experience of carrying their spears was like. My learning curve with Dennis was insanely steep and comprised the kind of education that few survive for long. While my education with Brian was far gentler, I learned important lessons from him. If not for my adventures, I would likely not have much worth saying. Even though much of this essay “merely” deals with mainstream science theory and data, my radicalized perspective was responsible for how I approached the issues. This essay is obviously not the work of a professional scientist or economist.

My adventures after the 1980s were milder, even though I risked prison again with Dennis, but I have had too much adventure and I am trying to live a fairly quiet life. As I stepped back periodically, during the quiet times, I reflected on our experiences and what our fellow travelers reported, and my views gradually changed. My initial orientation was the inventor’s approach, and that I got it the same year as my mystical awakening was likely significant for evolving my current perspective. That voice suggested that I study business, and I began developing the businessman’s perspective long before I met Dennis. My years with Dennis were about trying to make those teenage dreams a reality. I soon realized that my first mentor’s attitude misled me about inventors in general. Nearly all inventors invent to get rich and famous, not to help the world. I never met an altruistic inventor. I soon saw many unethical and criminal acts engaged in by Dennis’s “allies.” When I told Dennis how shocking it was to see, he told me to join the club.

Witnessing the orgies of fear and greed that Dennis’s associates regularly engaged in was a critical aspect of my awakening process, but what may have been more “fascinating” was how easily the GCs’ agents played Dennis’s associates like musical instruments, as they used everybody’s fear and greed to push the effort into self-destruction, and those “instruments” they so effortlessly played included people far older and supposedly worldlier than me. Bill the BPA Hit Man was definitely a professional provocateur, Mr. Texas was almost certainly one, and Mr. Deputy was also one. People like them rarely know exactly whom they really work for, nor do they care, as long as they are handsomely compensated. I had difficultly believing that “smart” people could be manipulated the way that I saw the GCs’ agents play them, but I soon understood that I was witnessing them surpass the limits of their integrity more than I was watching naïveté at work. Those affable and talented psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll usually played a fake angel game to get “allies” to betray us, and it regularly worked. After several years of observing such events, seeing people that I had known for nearly my entire life acting dishonorably, naïvely, cowardly, and even criminally, I learned my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity. The reason why we do not have FE and a healed planet today is because of the general population’s low integrity. I resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms. Today’s situation has little to do with the GCs and their minions. Almost nobody wants to hear that sobering truth, however, which is also part of the problem. Denial of how the world really works will not help for manifesting FE and a healed planet and humanity. The enemy is us, and always has been.

I watched Dennis try every approach that he could think of, from businesses to non-profits to the “patriot” approach and more. Dennis is a literalist Christian and has tried the religion route several times, which always ended in disaster, along with every other approach, and his self-professed religious fanaticism understandably dissuaded many from becoming involved with our efforts. I was always with Dennis in spite of his religious views, not because of them. All FE aspirants that I knew of had personal idiosyncrasies and foibles, including me, which comes with being human. Brian readily admitted that his astronaut and “bright lights” days tended to inflate his ego, and he had his Lapis Pig and Einsteinian hair, while the Disclosure Project’s founder took the über-warrior approach after his team was killed off soon after those Congressional hearings. I am a reclusive semi-nerd (hermit archetype) who can become overemotional. We are/were all citizens of history’s most arrogant nation and were all geniuses, which presented all of us with challenges in humility. I have watched FE aspirants disappear down the mystical rabbit hole and fall into the many pitfalls that await the newcomer. A week before I finished drafting this essay, a relatively new FE hopeful claimed that he was the Messiah, and he was not the first one to do that. The perfect candidate to lead an FE effort likely does not exist, but personal integrity is the quality that I value above all others. If a person does not have a sufficient store of it to begin with, the rest will not matter. The FE pursuit by people of low integrity does not have a prayer of success for navigating the innumerable perils and temptations that await. There are far more pretenders than contenders in the field, and the hazards of the FE pursuit are too overwhelming for most people to navigate for more than a few minutes.

When I first dreamed of changing the energy industry when I was sixteen, I imagined that not everybody would welcome a change in humanity’s energy paradigm. I clearly recall thinking that the resistance would come from foreign interests in tropical locales. I was probably influenced by the propaganda surrounding the USA’s invasion of Southeast Asia. Little did I suspect that the interests most hostile to changing humanity’s energy paradigm lived in the West. After my life was wrecked, I staggered from my home town, knowing that whatever I had been taught about how the world really worked was likely false, and I began seeking alternative sources of information. My first alternative influences on that subject were the work of Noam Chomsky, Ralph McGehee, Ed Herman, Howard Zinn, and others like them. After years of studying their work in my radicalized state, I came to realize that the West’s interaction with the developing world likely had little benevolent intent behind it, and the situation lasts to this day. If I had not already been radicalized, I wonder how receptive I would have been to their message. Those men were all among my most gracious correspondents, and I learned more from their collective efforts than I did from any other body of work.

The training that enabled remote viewings and other psychic feats ruined many scientific careers, as scientists received direct personal experience that the materialistic paradigm that guides mainstream science is false. Brian and I had our first remote viewing experiences performing the same exercise in the 1970s. I performed experiments regarding the human ability to generate a subtle energy that prevents rotting, and was able to generate great heat with my hands, which others have developed to far higher levels of mastery. Brian performed similar experiments and advocated a scientific approach to investigating such phenomena. Nearly all of my fellow travelers in the FE field had some kind of experience like that in their late teens or early twenties. Most were scientists or scientists-in-training. When people have experiences such as those, they will never accept the materialistic assumptions that dominate mainstream science. The giants of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, fully realized the orthodox framework’s limitations and all held “heretical” ideas that could be called mystical. Many organizations have sought to remedy the affliction of mainstream science that views consciousness as a mere epiphenomenon of brain activity. I met Brian at a conference for one such organization. It has been called bridging the gap between science and religion, and other terms. I see it as bringing science and consciousness together. Brian was a speaker at that conference, and his talk’s subject was the need for a new science. Until mainstream science allows consciousness into its paradigm and rejects its materialistic assumptions, it will be playing a small game, as the greatest science of all may be the science of consciousness.

Because the subject needs to be addressed and I have been involved with it, I will describe what I am aware of regarding the UFO and extraterrestrial (“ET”) issue. In the early 1990s, an emergency room doctor, Steven Greer, mounted an effort called the Disclosure Project to inform the public about the UFO/ET issue, and Brian was prominently involved. After years of briefing officials from many institutions, including the Vatican, United Nations, White House, Pentagon, and the USA’s Congress (and he never received a scoffing or disbelieving reaction), secret congressional hearings were held so that witnesses could testify (and key Disclosure Project members developed strange and fatal cancer cases immediately afterward). Ed Mitchell, who walked on the Moon, co-chaired the hearings and has been quite vocal about the ET presence. One Disclosure Project witness was one of the first astronauts, and other astronauts have described their experiences, at least of those who could talk publicly about them. I am aware of recent astronaut close encounters that have been classified. Brian had no doubt that his brush with death and the UFO-research “offer” were related.

When I began hearing Disclosure Project witness testimony, some exotic technologies they described were nearly exactly what my friend was shown, which I heard about several years before I heard the witnesses describing them. I have numerous connections to the issue, some of which involve highly public figures but, to me, the important issue is why there is a cover-up. Eisenhower was the last American president really in the loop on the UFO issue. John Kennedy was briefed on it, but the situation had largely been privatized by that time. Jimmy Carter had a famous confrontation with the Director of Central Intelligence soon after becoming president, where Carter asked for the CIA’s files on UFOs and was rebuffed. The CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence was George Bush the First, whom Carter fired soon after Bush rejected his request. I have also heard credible stories that Carter was threatened into silence. The most prominent NASA-Nazi was Wernher von Braun, who was largely responsible for NASA hiring Brian; he was picked with von Braun’s long-dreamed mission to Mars in mind. Dr. von Braun told his spokesperson in his last years that ETs would be portrayed as the ultimate terrorist threat used to form a one-world dictatorship so that humanity could huddle under its “protection,” and that the “threat” would be a fabrication created by the GCs, as ETs generally do not have hostile intent. As an example of anecdotes from those close to me, one friend was close to Allen Hynek’s family, and was told that Hynek’s transformation was indeed how it has been popularly presented, in that Hynek first approached the issue as a disbeliever and debunker, to eventually become convinced by the evidence that UFOs were a real phenomenon. In my circles are many who have experienced sightings and close encounters, and few, if any, would be considered members of the tinfoil-hat crowd. Stories of electrogravitic research going “black” in the 1950s also align with my understanding of the issue.

There is also a three-ring circus of disinformation around the UFO/ET issue, purveyed by numerous parties for various agendas, including the world’s national security states, especially the USA’s. I take most “insider” revelations with a grain of salt unless they are well-documented, as the “inside” generates a great deal of disinformation, attention-seekers pretend to be insiders, and other distractions. In the milieu are also hyperventilating conspiracists and stalwart establishment defenders, and many such defenders are naïve, dishonest, or both. Serious and often professional investigators are in the mix, as well as an easily misled public, among other parties to the pandemonium. Consequently, many do not seriously consider the situation, which is understandable. I went to see UFOs for myself, and was not disappointed. A similar situation surrounds the FE milieu. There seems to be a method to the madness, however, and the GCs have helped orchestrate the confusion, to their benefit. There are a few ways to try avoiding those minefields. One is to obtain direct personal experience with UFOs/ETs, another is to be close to key players in the field, and another is to spend a great deal of time digesting and testing the evidence. I have taken all three of those approaches, and all of the chaos aside, my perception in 2014 is that the reason for the UFO/ET cover-up has little or nothing to do with fear of a War of the Worlds reaction (which Eisenhower might have rightly feared in the 1950s, but most Americans today believe that we are not alone in the universe or are open to the idea), but to suppress exotic technologies that would end ultra-elite rule on Earth. Their rule would end for two reasons, the first of which is that FE and antigravity technologies would radically transform human civilization in ways that TV shows such as Star Trek partially depict, where humanity lived in true economic abundance for the first time. People living in scarcity are easily manipulated, but people living in abundance would not be. The second reason is that few humans would have much obedience to obviously corrupt Earth-based institutions, particularly draconian and violent ones, when it became accepted that humans are simply one of many sentient species in our galaxy and that we are not particularly advanced at all; we are more like cavemen than distinguished members of galactic society.

While knowledge that we are not alone in the universe will change humanity’s self-image, and NASA was warned about such a change, changing humanity’s economic and environmental situation is by far the most important upshot of the UFO/ET issue, which Greer also realizes; he has been involved with the FE issue for many years. He spoke at a conference that I helped organize and fund in 2004, where I learned from him about how large the GCs’ payoffs for silencing inventors have been, which was congruent with my experiences.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than was publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were sometimes close to the truth. We all understood that ultra-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the GCs, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that ultra-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop free FE and antigravity technologies for public use. I also discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop my current strategy.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is likely the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and the human journey will radically change. Ever since Tesla began building his tower, there have been many thousands of attempts to produce FE. Tesla’s tower was not initially intended to tap the zero-point field, but take advantage of the electric potential between Earth’s upper atmosphere and crust, and other technologies have accessed that potential energy. Some have tried to “defeat” the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as our efforts arguably attempted in the 1980s, which some scientists that I respected thought was possible. But the zero-point field is where the abundant and clean energy to initiate the Fifth Epochal Event will come from, and many have accessed it. When scientists and inventors have extracted energy from the zero-point field, they then received the GCs’ attention, and the suppression of such technologies has become a science during the past century. As this essay's final chapter explores, I became aware of many avenues that have been attempted, and all have been miserable failures, with the “lucky” aspirants receiving the “Golden Handcuffs” of being bought out, with their technology being either shelved or clandestinely developed. I am constantly made aware of the latest FE aspirants’ efforts, who are almost always an inventors with dreams of greed, delusions of grandeur, potentially fatal naïveté, or strange combinations of all three afflictions, and “supporters” who will quickly betray them to the highest bidder, and nobody’s pockets are as deep as the GCs’. This essay’s final chapter will discuss what has not worked and what I no longer have any interest in, and why my intended approach will be something different than anything tried before, as far as I know. To a great degree, I am standing on the shoulders of Fuller and my professional ancestors in the FE field, many of whom were genuinely well-intended but were understandably unaware of how the system really worked. They usually found out the hard way, as I did. Probably the primary reason why I am able to do this work is that I was a teenager when my energy dreams began and somehow survived my adventures so that by age 30 I was a grizzled veteran. When older FE aspirants had their adventures, for those who survived them, they were usually crippled by their traumas. I was young enough to survive my traumas, but I will always be recovering from them.

As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time we have some hints, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to capture the imagination, Brian and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate.

On Star Trek, replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the GCs’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it. Almost all that I know and feel comfortable reporting regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have described, usually by telling me directly. The next chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it could well come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make that chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in that chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

Robert J. Niewiadomski
30th May 2014, 17:42
Creation of matter (or rather making it dense) out of ZPF has been theoretically proven to be possible by White Science (in 1930s !):
NewScientist: Lasers could make virtual particles real (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19327-lasers-could-make-virtual-particles-real.html)

Next-generation lasers will have the power to create matter by capturing ghostly particles that, according to quantum mechanics, permeate seemingly empty space.

The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that space can never be truly empty. Instead, random fluctuations give birth to a seething cauldron of particles, such as electrons, and their antimatter counterparts, called positrons.

These so-called "virtual particles" normally annihilate one another too quickly for us to notice them. But physicists predicted in the 1930s that a very strong electric field would transform virtual particles into real ones that we can observe. The field pushes them in opposite directions because they have opposite electric charges, separating them so that they cannot destroy one another.

Lasers are ideally suited to this task because their light boasts strong electric fields. In 1997, physicists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Menlo Park, California, used laser light to create a few electron-positron pairs. Now, new calculations suggest next-generation lasers will be able to create such pairs by the millions.(...)

And actually it has been achieved :) By White Science and with help of present-day "primitive" equipement:
NewScientist: Light pulled out of empty space (http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228392.700-light-pulled-out-of-empty-space.html)

YOU can get something from nothing - as long as you are moving close to the speed of light. The discovery confirms a 41-year-old prediction on how to pull energy from empty space and produce light.

The phenomenon relies on the long-established fact that empty space is not at all empty, but fizzing with particles that pop in and out of existence (see "Out of the ether: the changing face of the vacuum"). This is down to the laws of quantum mechanics, which say that even a vaccum cannot have exactly zero energy but must exhibit small fluctuations of energy. These fluctuations show themselves as pairs of short-lived particles.

The presence of these "virtual" particles, usually photons, has long been proved in experiments demonstrating the standard Casimir effect, in which two parallel mirrors set close together will feel a pull towards each other. This happens because the small space between the mirrors limits the number of virtual photons that can appear in this region. Since there are more photons outside this space, the radiation pressure on the mirrors from the outside is larger than the pressure between them, which pushes the mirrors together.(...)

So if White Science openly admits empty space is not empty at all. What are they waiting for one could ask?

Now, just imagine what Black Science is capable of thanks to it's "toys"...

Limor Wolf
30th May 2014, 18:17
Hi Robert ~

It seems that Mainstream science will be ready to admit to quantum Physics, positrons and particles that 'do not behave themselves' anytime nowdays, but will not relate or will go the extra mile to suggest in the direction of free energy and what it can do for us, even if only with the initial thoughts and the narrow possibility of the use of it (once a drop leaks out, the whole dam is breaking, a kind of a black or white scenario). Most everything under Mss, especially the formal institutions is very much calculated and purposeful. Scientific discoveries will be navigated in one direction - usually with relations to the use of 'exotic' technologies, but will continue to be suppressed completely if it contains any promise of liberty and freedom to the human race, that is still a big 'No, No'.

Changes in that direction will have to come with consciousness and awarness, not from main stream science :)

Many blessings ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 18:54
Hi Robert and Limor:

Yes, mainstream science is in a straightjacket on those issues, with "limited hangout" stuff like that appearing now and then:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

The breakthroughs will not come from white science.

Time for some chores, including a little hiking. :)

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
30th May 2014, 21:44
In the spirit of visioning, if you think about bringing a new baby to the world you might want to think about names in advance. Here are a few suggestion. No ownership, of course, but a tribal child rearing

FEvron
FEtroleum
RosenFEt
ConcoFE
FEtronas
FEmex
FErazier

:)

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 22:31
Hi:

The past day has been spent in heavy editing and reorganizing the last several chapters, and the last one looks like the below now.

Ah, Limor, I try to not make it catchy, and I did not invent with this in mind, but I would call it the FEEvent, and you can think of it as either the Fifth Epochal Event, or the Free Energy Event. :)

Best,

Wade




What Has Not Worked So Far and What Might - Part 1

Many thousands of attempts have been made to make energy technology that taps the zero-point field and other sources of energy currently not exploited (such as the environmental energy of Dennis’s heat pump (or even getting more energy out of a gallon of gasoline, as my mentor's engine did and Dennis's final efforts in the USA)), few efforts have ever achieved any success. After many years of being in the trenches, trading notes, and watching from afar, I noticed that these were the primary problems that all FE efforts suffered from:

1. The technical effort was underfunded, was often flawed in that it either did not achieve anything that could tap those sources in a significant way, or it succumbed to the vagaries that doom most business efforts (lack of integrity in the principle member, dishonest/greedy associates, inexperience, poor decision-making, delusions of grandeur, etc.);

2. If the effort reached a certain level of promise, it was then targeted for organized suppression, which could originate from the local, state, national, or global levels (always at the behest of private interest patrons), and many tactics of suppression have been used, from subtle sabotage to billion dollar bribes to seizure under national security laws to media smear campaigns to imprisonment on trumped-up charges to murder; the aspirants' inexperience and naïveté regarding the field of disruptive energy technology made those development and distribution efforts particularly susceptible to the suppression efforts, which rarely needed to become overt or severe;

3. There was almost no awareness or support from the public at large, due to:

a. The vast majority of humanity does not know anything about FE and does not want to know, with several levels of disinterest and denial, ranging from outright uncaring to sophisticated arguments for why FE is either impossible or dangerous;

b. Their manipulation by the social managers (media, law enforcement, educators, "experts," etc.);

c. Their inability and unwillingness to understand the stakes of the situation, including both the potential of the new energy source and the peril of not acting, partly due to their scientific illiteracy, so they were easily distracted and led astray;

4. For those with some idea of FE’s potential, there were numerous pitfalls in their perspectives that ended up harming FE efforts, which included:


a. Their ignorance of how the world’s political-economic dynamics really worked, from how markets are controlled to how political establishments work to how organized suppression works, at the local, state, national, and global levels;

b. Their naïveté of how their family, friends, and colleagues would react to the idea of FE and abundance;

c. Their inability to understand that scarcity-based ideologies were not aligned with manifesting a situation of abundance; those ideologies might work for most “activism,” but the perils and temptations of FE, as well as the organized suppression, have proven too formidable for those kinds of approaches;

d. They could not relinquish their self-serving orientation to the issue, and became seduced by greed, delusions of grandeur, and other ego-traps;

e. Their inability to understand the truly epochal nature of FE, which likely meant that only an epochal approach might work; the standard methods of the capitalistic, governmental, “philanthropic,” and environmental organizations would not work for developing and bringing FE to the world;

f. They would get stuck in today’s arrested development in the field, where it is focused on scientists, inventors, business opportunities, and retail politics, and various New Age aspects of it;

In order to mount an effort that may have a chance of success, the effort needs these qualities:

• It must be volunteer, non-profit, and transparent, to help prevent the disunities that self-seeking cause;

• It must have the support of a large enough group that understands the stakes of the issue and is not easily susceptible to organized suppression;

• The key understandings are far easier achieved if those supporting the effort have some scientific literacy, as well as familiarity with the role of energy in the human journey; they also need to develop something approaching a comprehensive perspective of the situation, so that they are not easily distracted and led astray.

Those attributes are far easier described than achieved, but my essay is about beginning to develop them, and the rest of this essay explores those issues in some depth. More than thirty years after I began dreaming of changing the energy industry, I published a framework to organize the thousands of reactions to the idea of FE that I have witnessed, and I will refer to it for the remainder of this essay. Several years after publishing that framework, I have yet to find a reaction that does not easily fit into that framework’s categories.

The first level of awareness of FE is no awareness at all. Dennis spoke on hundreds of talk radio shows in the early 1990s between his stints in jail and prison, mounted national ad campaigns, barnstormed the USA repeatedly, and engaged in many other activities. There have been several national TV shows about Dennis, but they were all smear campaigns, as nearly all media coverage was, often featuring a “skeptic” who made up lies about Dennis and concocted new lies when his old ones were exposed. Whether the attention was good or bad, many millions of Americans have at least heard of FE, in no small measure because of Dennis, but even the movie The Incredibles featured zero-point energy. It is safe to say that many Americans, maybe even more than half, have at least heard of FE in some way. Some have simply not heard of it, others would not care even if they heard of it, and even most people who heard of it probably regard it as a cartoon fantasy, and that is just how the GCs like it. Their goal is to keep as large a fraction of the population at that level of awareness as possible. If the herd is not even restless or has any idea in what direction freedom might lie, it is exceedingly easy to manage.

Then there is the population’s fraction that has heard of FE and consciously considered the idea as a real possibility, and by far the most common reaction is to use their ideologies of choice to quickly dismiss it. Resorting to dismissals rooted in nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are the most common that I have seen, and are reflexive actions, where the idea leaves their awareness almost as fast as it arrived, similar to Orwell’s Memory Hole. Those who never heard of FE and those who immediately dismiss it with reflexive reactions comprise more than 99% of today’s global and Western population.

Some people are more thoughtful, who donate to seemingly worthy causes and genuinely care about what is happening in the world, at least enough to not reflexively dismiss FE. When they hear of FE, they may ask their scientist relatives and associates what they know about it, they might contact their favorite environmental organization, and the like. The reply almost invariably is that FE is “impossible” or would be used to destroy the planet through either warfare or environmental destruction, and they are advised to seek elsewhere for solutions to the world’s problems, and those seekers obediently drop the subject. They trust those authority figures, FE seemed all-too-fantastic anyway, and such people generally fall into the political liberal category. If they live in the West, and I know the USA best, they probably listen to NPR and watch PBS and the BBC, and follow the news on some “progressive” sites.

Those levels of awareness have either no knowledge or gain only a superficial understanding of the issues before succumbing to their conditioning and trusting various authorities. The next level of denial is the most intelligent one and includes recognized experts in their fields, and most scientists and academics have their FE awareness at that level, if they are aware at all. They are often those whom those thoughtful progressives asked for their opinion on FE. Their responses include invoking the “laws of physics” and other reasons why FE is “impossible,” and they irrationally dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” Many breakthroughs in science and technology were often called “impossible,” even after they were achieved, with the reception afforded the Wright brothers actually open-minded compared to the how the idea of FE is received today in such circles.

Brian tried interacting with those scientists and academics, and became extremely dismayed. I also tried for many years, and their naïveté and circular reasoning were probably the most frustrating aspects of their responses. When I approached one academic who at least mentioned FE as a possibility, and who cited situations that I had been involved with, his reaction was stunning. That group, as a whole, might be the last to accept FE’s reality, which is similar to what the Brookings Institute warned NASA about regarding the UFO/ET issue.

For those who at least admit that FE is possible, probably the most common response is that they want an FE device to power their home, or one to study in their laboratory. Who would not want a quadrillion dollar technology delivered to their home? Those were the equivalent of Dennis’s customers under his shared savings programs. Their “skin in the game” was waiting for a miraculous and world-changing technology to be delivered to them, preferably for free.

Perhaps the next most common reaction for those not denying that FE is possible is those who fear FE (they may outnumber those who will gladly accept FE delivered to their homes and labs). Their fears are usually stated to be around weaponizing FE or using it to destroy Earth’s remaining ecosystems. However, that reaction seemed to camouflage other, deeper fears. I have never succeeded in engaging such people in rational conversation regarding those fears. I eventually suspected that they really feared abundance and seemed addicted to scarcity. They built their entire lives around surviving in a world of scarcity, and saw abundance as a threat to their existence. Such reactions are like the GCs’, and for similar reasons. They know that the world as they know it will end with FE, they are afraid that their role in that new world will be diminished, and prefer the devil they know, and in some cases are that devil.

Those various reactions are not mutually exclusive, as some people will react with combinations of them, and the fear of FE is often espoused by those who have sophisticated objections to the idea of FE, with their reaction along the lines of: “FE is impossible, thankfully, because if we had it, we would only destroy ourselves and the planet with it.”

Those aforementioned categories encompass the reactions of more than 99.9% of humanity at this time. The next levels of my framework describe people actually trying to do something about the situation, and they all have my respect, even if their motivation may be to get rich and famous and other self-serving motivations, or they are naïve. Everybody that I respect in this field began their journeys naively. Naïveté is no crime, and I greatly respect people who lost their naïveté honestly, usually by trying to make the world a better place. However, naïveté is potentially fatal in this field, and I am attempting to mount an effort where naïveté will be less hazardous for its participants, although it still needs to be shed as soon as possible.

In the awareness level of people doing something or planning to, the beginner's perspective is thinking that the energy industry will welcome innovative technology and that organized suppression does not exist. This plays into the capitalist canard that the world is constantly seeking the better mousetrap. Some are looking, but not to bring them to market; to instead ensure that they never do. Wiping out the competition is the essence of capitalism. After having his companies stolen many times, surviving Mafia hit attempts (1, 2) and the like, Dennis still believed the electric companies’ propaganda in Washington State in the wake of the biggest municipal bond default in the USA's history to that time. He devoted great effort toward interesting the electric companies in the kind of energy conservation that their full-page ads stated that they desperately needed, thinking that he would get a tickertape parade. In the midst of trying to interest the electric companies, an anonymous party began wrecking Dennis’s business relationships, and just as he entered into a large deal with a finance company, the electric companies unmasked themselves and went public in their attacks on Dennis’s company. Among the many attacks that came simultaneously from Washington State’s power structure, a professional provocateur with fake alternative energy credentials infiltrated Dennis’s company and was subsequently responsible for the death of one of Dennis’s employees, which was Dennis’s radicalizing moment in his energy adventures.

Sparky Sweet, who had a scientific career at General Electric, also believed that the energy industry would welcome his solid-state FE device. He mailed working prototypes to the big energy institutions, expecting a tickertape parade. The opposite happened, with shadowy interests destroying his business deals, similar to Dennis’s experience. Sparky did not take the hint and kept trying, which led to death threats. After their final threats, Sparky fled into hiding, where Brian visited him, and Sparky died the next week of a “heart attack.” Dying that way has been common among FE contenders who played near Sparky’s level. Dennis, Sparky, and many others like them lost their naïveté the hard way, but the field has been filled with newcomers who deny the reality of organized suppression as they charge forward with visions of riches and fame. It is perhaps the most common level of awareness where FE newcomers will be found. Most never develop anything worth suppressing so will never know any differently, and will enter and leave the field with that beginner's level of awareness intact, which was once the most common one in the field. However, with enough people trying and either living to tell the tale or others chronicling their dire fates, which often included untimely deaths, and the Internet spreading information like never before, few FE newcomers have much excuse for being unaware of the fates of their professional ancestors.

The next level of awareness might be more dangerous than the previous one, where FE newcomers realize that there is organized suppression, but they think that they are clever enough, lucky enough, or have some other unique quality that will allow them to avoid the suppression, usually by playing secrecy games. One fellow traveler invented an FE prototype in a nuclear laboratory, fresh out of college, and was fired the next day. He then tried the “sneak past them” approach, to be rudely disabused of his idea. Years later, he talked to fellow travelers and began understanding the magnitude of what he stumbled into. He realized that he was like a kindergartener that ran onto the field during an NFL game, thinking that he could play with the men. Today’s FE newcomers often begin at this level, and I hear no end of plans to sneak past the organized suppression, run past it so fast that the suppressors will not know what hit them, and many other fantasies. I probably see that delusion the most often anymore, which is similar to 18-year-old boys pining to prove their manhood on the battlefield.

The next level of awareness might be the most common among people progressing beyond denial of FE’s possibility or existence. They believe that the situation is hopeless and that there is no point in even trying. They are often those building bunkers to survive the coming collapse of global civilization. I have some respect for that position, but it certainly will not help solve humanity’s problems or help the Fifth Epochal Event manifest. Nobody that I respect in the FE field ever felt hopeless. We all began our journeys naïvely, but we never conceded defeat. When the night was the darkest during my journey, then the miracle happened, so admitting defeat before even beginning does not seem productive or even realistic, and can lead to dysfunctional coping behaviors and even suicidal tendencies.

The next level of awareness is similar to those fantasies that organized suppression can be avoided or outmaneuvered. The people in this category are almost all men, and men comprise more than 90% of the FE field today, which is one of its pitfalls. The people at this level of awareness believe that they can defeat the GCs in battle, expose them, and other silly ideas. I call them the Young Warriors, and when they arrive with their armor and weapons, the only outcome that you can guarantee is that when those weapons get used, they will be used on you or the Young Warriors will use them on each other. The GCs will view the resulting carnage with amusement, marveling at how easy the organized suppression game is, when the targets do almost all of the GCs’ work for them. The only warriors of any potential benefit to an FE effort have abandoned coercion and adopted persuasion, usually because they have experienced enough battles and discovered the complete futility of coercion.

The next level of awareness is where Dennis, Brian, and I spent many years, and Dennis and Brian largely stayed there while I finally had to admit that it did not work and was unlikely to, which led to my current strategy. That level is the mass movement mentality. Dennis and Brian drank deeply at the wells of their nationalist indoctrination, as have others with my great respect. Dennis tried forming movements around Christian ideology early in his journey, and even tried it again recently. He also tried the “patriot” approach, and almost all of his efforts either involved risk-free (to the customer) marketing plans, business opportunities, or both. Dennis appealed to all three of the most prominent population management ideologies in the USA to attract interest in and involvement with his efforts. I helped Brian found a non-profit mass movement to raise awareness of FE, and it was the last time that I ever will try the mass movement approach. Mass movements, by their very nature, appeal to lowest-common-denominator beliefs to form movement “cohesion.” Unfortunately, those beliefs are usually false, as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are built on lies, half-truths, and self-serving myths. Little resembling enlightenment comes from such ideologies, and I came to believe that enlightenment is the missing ingredient, and the necessary prerequisite for enlightenment is a caring heart. Without that caring heart, the rest will not matter.

When I lived with Dennis in Boston during my beginner's days, when I was also mildly susceptible to delusions of grandeur, Dennis said that “the people” innately cared, but had nothing worth caring about, which was why they danced to the tune of the Establishment’s indoctrination and conditioning, often without much enthusiasm. With little other frame of reference yet, I believed Dennis. I had my naïveté harshly purged during the next few years and received my life’s primary lesson. A decade later, after several attempts, Dennis finally coaxed me into working with him again, which did not last long and I nearly went to prison for my trouble, as the GCs raised the game to a new level of sophistication. When I was with Dennis that time, he admitted that almost nobody really cared, but he was sifting through humanity’s mine tailings, looking for gold nuggets. He rarely found any.

There is another level worth mentioning, where the aspirant is overwhelmed with delusions of grandeur, believing himself to be the messiah, or planning to become the Bill Gates of FE, and even billionaires are susceptible to that delusion, as they play their games of fake philanthropy and insatiable greed.

Only after many years of carrying spears for Dennis and Brian, and trying my own efforts, did I arrive at my current strategy, which has not been tried before that I know of. It is the enlightenment route to FE. Few on Earth today are very enlightened or saintly, if anybody really is, but striving for those goals is where the key to helping FE manifest in public may lie. Many inventors have publicly demonstrated working FE prototypes, but they were all quickly silenced or otherwise removed from the scene, and violence has commonly been applied, although it is less common than it used to be, as the GCs’ bag of tricks has become more sophisticated.

Before discussing my current approach, I will present the state of the FE field today, which also helps explain why I am taking my approach.

All the low-integrity activities in the FE field aside, it has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive. When the GCs wiped us out in 1988, what made us dangerous was not so much the technology we were working on; we were building a network of businesses that could manufacture and distribute disruptive energy technologies, and Sparky Sweet lived right down the road from us. If we became too prominent to easily snuff out, plenty of people like Sparky could have come forward. That was the primary threat that we presented, led by Dennis’s ingenious methods and his unparalleled courage.

Other than Dennis and a few others, the FE field has generally been dominated by inventors and scientists, stuck at that early stage. It was similar to the super heat pump “industry” when Dennis arrived on the scene. The traditional solar industry also attacked Dennis when he sold the world’s best heating system. Everybody saw Dennis as a threat, not only the energy oligarchy led by the GCs, but “competitors” in the alternative energy field and those scientists and inventors who libeled Dennis. Today, I cannot currently recommend anybody’s efforts in the FE field. There are some worthy players in the milieu, some of whom know they are risking their lives and have suffered organized suppression activities, including murder attempts, but their approach has never come close to working. I will survey some pitfalls that FE aspirants regularly fall into, and stumbling into them can be life-wrecking or fatal.

The GCs are merely the apex predator in a political-economic jungle filled with predators. If the GCs are Godzilla, then the jungles are also filled with tyrannosaurs, velociraptors, and the many docile herbivores that they feast on, with some furtive creatures eking out existences on the margins. Most Americans have no awareness of the issue, but the USA’s federal government has classified thousands of patents, largely energy-related patents, according to credible sources. The 1971 guide for classifying patented technologies extended to photovoltaics that had efficiencies of greater than 10% or any energy conversion technology that achieved greater than 70-80% efficiency. FE devices are often called “over-unity” because they produce more energy than it takes to run them. Consequently, any over-unity device was subject to being classified, and Sparky Sweet’s device was 100,000,000% efficient, which was slightly over the threshold for classifying it. Sparky never patented his device and kept it proprietary, avoiding seizure that way, but that leads to other problems. Thousands of energy technology inventors have had their patented devices seized under the national security laws, and that is merely the tip of the iceberg of what has been suppressed. What got Steven Greer pursuing FE was when he met with a faction of the GCs. The meeting was in the early 1990s, and in 2004 I heard Greer report on his conversations with them; one disclosure was that the GCs had paid $100 billion in bribes to sequester disruptive technologies over the years, and energy technologies above all. When I heard Greer say that, it made perfect sense to me, as Dennis rejected two offers that I know of, I even heard of others in casual conversations with corporate co-workers, and I heard plenty of other such tales from people in the field, and Greer claims to have rejected a $2 billion offer to cease his efforts. The amount might be $200 billion by now.

Those taking the money have donned the “Golden Handcuffs,” as that money bought their silence and their technology was usually shelved, usually with the “seller” being unaware of the true nature of the “sale.” But even Golden Handcuffs are a fair ways down the path of organized suppression. The GCs’ bag of tricks is deep, and many low-cost strategies can be tried before they resort to using Golden Handcuffs, using the patent office to seize technologies and, in the relatively rare instance, violence. We received the first friendly buyout offer soon after we began pursuing FE, and the offer escalated by a couple orders of magnitude before they began to play rough. Kangarooing Dennis into prison and then making “mistakes” that put him in with murderers, is one of many techniques at their disposal, and such treatment can often be free-lance malice engaged in by “public servants” and other Establishment figures, without them needing to be instructed or compensated by the GCs, or even being aware of the evil interests that their actions serve. They probably would not even care if they knew, and many would solicit “employment” if they knew how valuable their activities were to rich and powerful interests, no matter if those activities eventually made Earth uninhabitable (as long as it happened after they died or they were “guaranteed” a berth in the GCs’ survival enclaves).

The GCs are not squeamish, but they rarely resort to violence in the public arena; they know that a string of deaths threatens to focus attention on their efforts. When the GCs’ minions engage in lethal interventions, either by direct murder or throwing people such as Dennis into a shark tank and letting “nature” take its course, what seems to be more important than killing the target in any particular attempt is making it appear to be something other than premeditated murder. I am not at liberty to publicly disclose details of numerous murder attempts that have been described to me either from the target or second-hand by highly credible associates, but it is not easy to murder somebody and make it look like something else (suicides, heart attacks, strange cancer cases, random crimes, accidents, and the like), and if an attempt initially fails, the assassins will not “double tap” them like more mundane assassins will, such as Mafia hit men, as it removes any doubt that it was premeditated murder. If the target survives the initial attempt, the assassins will withdraw and try again another time, as making it look like something else is more important than being successful with any one attempt. That is likely why some FE activists have survived numerous murder attempts. Also, a failed attempt can often have the desired effect, as it can frighten or incapacitate the target to where he (almost always a man, not a woman) is no longer a threat in the disruptive technology field, FE most of all, and further action is unnecessary.

Dennis should be dead dozens of times over. He has survived several outright murder attempts, and few were likely GC attempts, but from other interests. I do not like hearing the stories, and neither did Brian. Brian had firsthand experience with violent suppression and those who experience suppression usually do not make it a point to collect suppression stories as others have, but he knew about 25 dead inventor stories. It is primarily in the realm of disruptive technologies, especially energy technologies, that such organized suppression strategies are used. Such activities are unremarkable in that milieu, although it blows the minds of average people and newcomers to the field. The GCs have developed their organized suppression of disruptive technologies into a science, and that scene from the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark is not very fictional.

Nobody has ever mounted more auspicious or persistent attempts at the businessman’s route to alternative and free energy than Dennis’s. If Dennis could not do it, I do not know who can. But today’s FE field is filled with inventors with dreams of fame and fortune, who think they are the messiah, who apply for patents, who try to raise money, and so on. I have never seen one of them with a prayer of success and I try to ignore them, but I am bombarded with news of the inventor-of-the-hour by various FE enthusiasts. During the month that I drafted this essay’s chapter, I was informed of the activities of no less than half-dozen aspirants and their technologies, with FE being the usual technology, but the “news” can also include high-MPG cars. They are all the same paths to disaster that I have survived, witnessed, heard of, and read of more times than I care to recall. A famous quote attributed to Einstein and Ben Franklin, among others, is that insanity is performing the same act repeatedly, expecting a different outcome each time. The entire FE and alternative energy field suffers from that condition, trying the same approaches literally thousands of times, each time the aspirants thinking that they will succeed. What makes that situation slightly more justified is that few survive the first failure to try again, so the field is “weeded out” that way. Also, the organized suppression is often so subtle that its targets do not even realized that they were suppressed, and those donning the Golden Handcuffs also had their silence bought, and all of those untimely deaths of FE aspirants rarely look like what they probably are to the casual observer, and can be reasonably denied as being murder, if the larger pattern is ignored. However, it is long past time for a different approach and, refreshingly, there have been baby steps in the direction that I will advocate, made by various members of the field.

Wade Frazier
30th May 2014, 22:32
What Has Not Worked So Far and What Might - Part 2

In summary, here are some approaches that have never come close to working and likely never will, and why:

1. Patenting an FE invention:


a. For FE devices, patents are generally denied on the “laws of physics” objection, even though it is an a priori way to reject a patent application, declaring it impossible as a starting point, so that until establishment science blesses FE as even possible, it cannot be patented, in a classic Catch-22 situation; with that logic, the Wright brothers would have never been able to patent their airplanes;

b. The applicants have announced their self-serving intentions, and organized suppression almost effortlessly defeats the self-interested;

c. Patents can be granted and then seized using national security laws, and inventors can go to prison if they keep developing their inventions, in an Orwellian twist;

2. Not patenting an FE invention and keeping it proprietary:


a. Keeping technology secret is the same game that the GCs play; Western “medicine” went through a proprietary medicine craze, where snake oil and other secret-ingredient “medicines” were sold, and there are unscrupulous people in the FE field who sell the snake-oil equivalent of FE;

b. Genuine FE inventors who really have something are often tarred with the same brush as the charlatans when they play the proprietary technology game;

c. The only people in the dark when FE inventors play the proprietary technology game is the public; whatever the FE inventor built, the GCs developed to a commercial level at least fifty years ago, and they have the 35th generation of the technology of what the FE inventor built in his garage; such inventors are either oblivious to that reality or they think that somehow they will be allowed to succeed, and often harbor the rest of those 18-year-old fantasies; people such as Sparky Sweet took their “secret sauce” proprietary information to their graves with them, unwittingly making the GCs’ job pretty easy, as they self-suppressed their technology;

d. Identically with those applying for patents, those playing the proprietary technology game have announced their self-interest and are easily defeated by the GCs’ bag of tricks;

3. Raising money from capitalistic sources (venture capital, stock sales, and other kinds of investors, including customers):


a. Receiving money from investors, customers, and the like is a quick way to go to prison on trumped up charges (1, 2);

b. If inventors try that route, they will eventually lose the rights to their technologies to their investors; even for normal inventing, inventors rarely profit from their inventions, and for FE inventing, it is well-nigh impossible;

c. If the invention has promise for making FE, some investors will undoubtedly be agents of organized suppression or garden-variety organized crime;

d. With capitalistic efforts, members of the effort regularly become seduced by the immensity of FE’s potential, and the Treasure of the Sierra Madre effect arises, and the effort collapses in an frenzy of self-destructive greed;

4. Finding rich philanthropists:


a. “Rich philanthropist” is an oxymoron; there are probably no truly “rich philanthropists” active on Earth today;

b. For the few that may have wanted to help fund FE efforts, the GCs quickly dissuaded them (they do not offer carrots, but go straight to the stick, as it is hard to bribe rich people); that avenue has rarely been successfully navigated that I know of, and never at a level where it will make a difference for making FE happen;

5. Sneaking past the GCs:


a. They have global surveillance capabilities second to none, and cannot be snuck past;

b. The very idea of sneaking past them is rooted in an adolescent fantasy that usually leads to paranoia and other foibles, and the effort’s self-destruction;

6. A guerilla revolution led by garage inventors possessing blueprints for building FE prototypes:


a. Making a viable FE prototype is far harder than it might seem – relatively few garage tinkerers ever develop anything worth suppressing – and even then they usually wreck their lives in the process (go broke, get divorced, are injured in laboratory/shop mishaps, etc.), before any suppression techniques need to be applied;

b. Many inventors have demonstrated FE prototypes (Dennis, Moray, Gray, Reed, Sweet, Trombly, etc.), but for those not immediately subjected to suppression activity (often the violent kind), the gulf between a working prototype and something for public use is more than $100 million of development ; money only buys somebody’s effort, and when FE efforts have been starved of money, as they all have been, it is a tacit admission that not enough people will be involved because they understand the issue’s importance and care, but they must be bribed to become involved;

c. Contrary to rumors that abound and related myths, there is no army of garage tinkerers waiting for the blueprints to go build one or are capable of building them, that will organize into an effective effort;

7. Mounting a mass movement, especially around ideologies such as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion:


a. Those ideologies are seated in scarcity-based, self-serving, and fearful assumptions, and the GCs have masterfully used those ideologies to control the masses; out-herding the master shepherd with his own tools is very unlikely;

b. Because all such ideologies cater to self-interest, the effort attracts those of corrupt motivation from the outset and are easily defeated by organized suppression, if they do not internally collapse before then;

c. Scarcity-based ideologies, and efforts with allegiance to them, are old skins that will not hold the new wine;

d. Members of the general public are usually only interested in FE if they can immediately profit from it, such as have it delivered to their homes for free, or FE presents a business opportunity, and the like, and their self-serving and usually scientifically illiterate orientation is easily distracted; they are often more harm than help, and are easily seduced/dissuaded by the agents of organized suppression; the naïve, idly curious, greedy, and others are little or no help at this stage;

8. Trying to conquer the organized suppression:


a. Only extremely foolish men in thrall to adolescent fantasies consider this approach, and its battle-oriented perspective will defeat the effort before it begins;

b. The only casualties will be those Young Warriors and those they are allegedly trying to help; the GCs are not threatened by such approaches;

9. Media campaigns:


a. The media is a key part of the global power structure, and it again is their tool, not the activists’;

b. For every dollar an activist spends on media campaigns, the power structure can spend a hundred times as much to overwhelm the effort with negative coverage, not to mention unleashing the legal system and other assets against the media effort (I lived through a few of those, and witnessed others);

10. The hero’s or messiah’s journey:


a. It is an archetypal role that almost nobody on Earth is qualified to play, and many are easily seduced into thinking that they are the messiah or world’s hero; it again appeals to men, especially young ones; megalomania is a hazard for this approach;

b. For the few qualified for such a role/task, one hero/messiah against the GCs does not stand a chance;

11. Hosting conferences to raise awareness:


a. Such conferences are crawling with agents of various interests, including the CIA and other intelligence organizations, the GCs, and local, state, and federal law enforcement acting on behalf of various interests, none of whom are allies and are usually intent on destroying the effort;

b. Attempted murder of key conference figures before, during, or immediately after the conference is all-too-common;

c. Those attending the conferences rarely have agendas in alignment with the conference organizers’ intention; groupies and other celebrity chasers attend, many come for the show or to fill their social needs, and many unwary and gullible participants easily fall under the spell of psychopathic agents infiltrating the effort to help take it down from the inside, usually striking when the attacks come from the outside, and many attend to survey the effort, to see how they can dominate/steal it;

12. Beseeching the world’s governments for assistance, particularly their military arms:


a. They are usually among those sending their agents to conferences;

b. They all answer, at some level, to the GCs, although few in those organizations are aware of the GCs in the slightest;

c. Washington D.C. activists often end up dead (1, 2, 3, 4), and others have “enjoyed” somewhat less dire fates (Brian and Dennis were run out of the USA for their efforts), but I have never heard of D.C. activism in these areas with a happy ending;

13. Beseeching corporate, environmental, charitable, scientific, or academic institutions:


a. They all have ideological commitments to their scarcity-based frames of reference, and they almost always view FE either as the enemy, or impossible because of the “laws of physics,” or they dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” and they have other reactions of denial; they are the groups often most resistant the very idea of FE;

b. In summary, there are not any organizations not already devoted to FE that have allied with FE efforts or are likely to; those doors have been banged on thousands of times, and nobody is home; in the rare instance when the door opens and the beseecher is let in, it is usually to impede/eliminate them, not to help; I have never seen genuine help given.


The gullibility and naïveté of those in the FE field, combined with libelers and other criminals in the ranks, are partly why, soon before he died, Brian said that if anybody brings FE to the world, it will not be people in the field today. I have either participated in, witnessed, or heard of from fellow travelers all of the above approaches numerous times, and there are far more written accounts of such approaches readily available. As I watched them play out many times, it became disheartening to watch the same paths of failure doggedly pursued, often by the aspirant-of-the-hour, usually an inventor, who always thought that he had some magic formula that would work while many thousands of his professional ancestors failed. All of those methods are ways to give our power away to someone or something else, pour the new wine into old skins, and generally act from a scarcity-based and victim-oriented perspective. None of those approaches have come close to working nor are likely to. Newcomers invariably advocate some kind of shortcut, an easy path to the finish line. None exist. The Fifth Epochal Event is not something that can be initiated in an afternoon, a month, or a year of effort, and I have watched many lifetimes expended in the pursuit, including mine. Nothing about this is easy, and I have helped the best of the best spend their lives trying. With a sufficient nucleus of enlightened people, it could be an easy task, but achieving that nucleus is the hard part.

For several years before writing this essay, I have stated that the only inventor-oriented approach with a prayer is for an inventor with the goods (a viable prototype undoubtedly generating FE) to give it to a worthy group so that they can take it the rest of the way, past humanity’s inertia and any organized suppression that might be inflicted on the effort. I have never heard of the inventor with the goods willing to give it away, and that worthy group does not yet exist, and my efforts could be seen as trying to help form it. Criticizing the inventor with the goods unwilling to give it away, when there is nobody worth to give it to, is unproductive.

Many years ago, after surviving my FE adventures, beginning to understand the milieu and trading notes with fellow travelers, I began to suspect that what I had experienced on the mundane level of discovering that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity was only a hint of something far more vast, my numerous paranormal events aside. I got the sense that the zero-point field was divine in nature, and if an intelligent species did not approach the issue with sufficient divine intention, they could not access the field or access it for long. The GCs might be doing humanity a favor, acting as some kind of integrity threshold that humanity must clear before the path to FE will open. Ten like Dennis or a hundred like Brian combining their efforts, and humanity would have had FE by now, but there are probably not that many like them on Earth. I began to suspect that the problem was really a lack of integrity and enlightenment, in ways that go far beyond practical notions of those issues. I have consequently been trying to walk and advocate the enlightenment route. Mine is more from an activist/academic perspective, not a messianic or mystical master approach, or the hero’s journey. But the masters’ teachings, at least those that the priesthoods have not distorted, I believe can be highly relevant. Some kind of spiritual grounding is probably necessary to pursue FE, but I would not advocate receiving it through organized religions. If love is understood as the best of all possible feelings, and acts from the heart are recognized as the most powerful that we can achieve, that is probably sufficient spiritual understanding, and achieving some mystical experiences may be critical for awakening the aspirant. Anything less than a divinely intended approach toward FE may not work, for reasons far beyond organized suppression or the public’s inertia. That is just an impression that slowly dawned on me, which I cannot prove to anybody, but it guides my thinking and efforts. Also, sources I respect have stated that the means become the ends, which is consistent with what I learned during my adventures and guided me from the beginning.

Several years before writing this essay, as I began studying for this essay in earnest, I happened upon a book published by an oil company, believe it or not, which helped me crystallize this essay’s epochal approach. The Second Epochal Event was missing from the author’s account, as well as the Fifth, of course, but in a discussion of socio-technical development, the author listed four different “vectors” of technological development, which he described as: Discovery, Invention, Innovation, and Diffusion. They corresponded to scientific discoveries, creating inventions, marketing them, and people using them. I have witnessed organized suppression in each vector.

The GCs are actively mischievous and vigilant, but any FE effort that makes them the central focus will likely fail. They need to be treated as a force of nature; respected and avoided when possible, but a storm or earthquake can always appear out of nowhere, and we are vulnerable to them and can only, at best, try to reduce our risk to them. If Godzilla comes to dinner, you are the dinner. The GCs cannot be fought, negotiated with, snuck past, or outsmarted. They can only be made obsolete, and a world based on abundance will do that, and even they can be redeemed, which would be my ideal outcome. Brian might have said it best when he said that a successful FE effort will rely on “combined positive intention,” not the “complaint-based” orientation of protestors, the conflict orientation of Young Warriors, and the like. We need to begin by aiming high and do our best to maintain that high level, and avoid being drug into the mire. A creator’s mindset, not a victim’s, is the key.

With all those paths that have led to nowhere, why do I think that my attempt will not be another dead-end? It could well be, but it is at least a new route and it should be harmless, which I highly value; I have seen enough carnage in this lifetime and do not want to be responsible for any more wrecked or prematurely ended lives.

What follows is whom I am looking for and what I plan to ask them to help me with; I am looking for people who:


• Deeply care about healing humanity and the planet (they are far less common than mainstream society believes);

• Do not pass the buck of responsibility to others, thinking that someplace in the world is an organization that cares and can save the day, and that their contribution is not needed; if you deeply care, you are greatly needed;

• Have had some kind of awakening experience, usually which showed them that their conditioning was an indoctrination into ways of thinking so that they could be controlled; once they can see through one of them, the others are easier to recognize; perhaps the hardest one to see through, particularly for “smart” people, is the rationalist-materialist paradigm usually taught to scientists (also called logical positivism); having the direct personal experience of a mystical awakening usually breaks through that indoctrination, but there is also professional peril, as those awakening in that way no longer “drink the Kool-Aid” of mainstream science, and their careers can end due to their disenchantment or through ostracism and outright firing and professional blackballing, if they do not remain quiet about their expanded orientation;

• Possess the mental horsepower necessary to think in complex enough terms so that they understand the rudiments presented in this essay and can preferably master aspects of it; understanding the scientific arguments and evidence presented in this essay is about the level that I think is needed, which is far less rigorous training than professional scientists receive, but should be sufficient to begin thinking in comprehensive terms;

• Possess some kind of experience in the real world that helped them shed the naïveté that usually accompanies the indoctrinated state noted above; naïveté is a potentially fatal affliction in this field, and being able to recognize the psychopaths who will be attracted to efforts that I will mount will be a critical faculty; such people will either be opportunists or on the payroll of organized suppression, and there will also be functional psychopaths who believe that they are saving the world by wiping out FE, and will use any means they deem necessary to achieve their goals.

What I plan to ask of those that I attract to my work includes:


• Reading this essay and diving deeply on as many areas as possible, in order to begin to develop comprehensive perspectives, particularly the roles of energy and consciousness;

• Doing enough homework and investigation to satisfy themselves that FE technology is at least possible, usually without being able to lay their hands on a working FE prototype and watching it in action; this is one of the more difficult tasks, and usually awakening experiences are necessary to begin to understand how organized suppression works, how much chaff there is for every grain of wheat on the fringes (so much that the wheat is hard to find), and other issues where people usually have to go deeply and get their hands dirty, and even be misled on an issue or two before they get to the bottom of it, to understand the process; but they will usually have to get to the bottom of at least one issue and find that it is valid, even though it may be marginalized and pilloried by the Establishment;

• Beginning to understand, in as comprehensive terms as possible, what FE’s potential is;

• Because my work is freely available to the public, people can digest it anonymously and quietly, and that is good work, too; however, for those whom I will ask to be in the “choir,” they will not be anonymous, and I am going to ask them to “sing” the song of abundance in cyberspace, and will seek to have the abundance song sung in a chorus of thousands, which has never happened on Earth before;

• That song will attract people who have longed for it for their entire lives, and if it can attract tens of thousands of people, preferably about 100,000 of them, then it will be time to take action and support a technical effort to develop FE technology for public use;

• That development effort will be non-profit, and whatever is developed will be open-sourced and given away, not sold; only a few will need to be given away before the Fifth Epochal Event will manifest.

Once a mass-production-ready FE device is developed, with 100,000 people maintaining their focus on the issue (and probably contributing financially, but with that many, nobody will contribute at levels where they suffer financially – and this stage only happens far down the path, probably at least several years into the future, if not more), the Fifth Epochal Event will be here, and that group’s “heroics” will no longer be needed and the fun can begin. As with the previous epochal events, the appearance of new energy technology that could harness the new energy source always was the event, which tapped a level usually an order of magnitude above that previously achieved. It will likely be no different this time, and as with the other epochal events, a tiny fraction of humanity will initiate the event, it will be copied by the rest of humanity, and it will transform the human journey in ways that were unimaginable before the epochal event (1, 2, 3, 4).

For today’s global civilization, 100,000 people amounts to about 0.001% of humanity, or 1-in-70,000 people. For the 5,000-7,000 people that I hope can form the “choir,” they only have to be one-in-a-million. Can one-in-a-million muster the integrity and complex awareness to understand abundance and sing the song? I think so. I think it might be as high as one-in-five-thousand, which means that there are 200 times as many potential singers on Earth as might be needed. I will take those odds. I am virtually certain that if I can find and train 5,000-7,000 singers that can attract an audience with the right stuff of 100,000 or so (that 100,000 will also develop enough of a comprehensive, abundance-based perspective, that they will understand the issue’s importance and keep their focus and will not be distracted, but nobody needs to be a hero). Meetings outside of cyberspace will eventually happen, but far later than most will think or likely want. The “let’s have a conference” mentality can be fatal for the effort in its early stages.

Perhaps the majority of the GCs are quietly hoping that efforts like this are successful, while the dark heart of that organization has dismissed the potential of what I am trying. I can only hope that potential suppressors underestimate the power of love. I am planning to survive this attempt. So far, I have not seen or heard of people in the West merely writing about these issues suffering untimely deaths and other dire fates. I have had my own Internet stalkers (1, 2), some of whom were professionals, and they may be only a first line of defense for a strategy that can turn violent, but I am gambling that it will not. I am likely only risking my life, however, and nobody else’s, although I will likely have to rudely dissuade gung-ho newcomers and other who rush toward the pitfalls with their “bright ideas,” like those 18-year-old boys seeking glory on the battlefield. Gung-hoers and those who follow them will likely present the greatest threat to my efforts, not organized suppression. Outlets exist for that newcomer mentality, and they can go see Dennis and the others trying “do something” approaches. Such newcomers will only put my efforts at risk, usually by putting themselves and those around them in harm’s way, usually quite unwittingly. Those in the choir will not have to worry much about organized suppression, other than affable, silver-tongued psychopaths trying to seduce them, and I will try to limit their opportunities and help people recognize them.

The path to developing FE technology for public use outlined above I believe can work, but there are also other ways that the Fifth Epochal Event can manifest. If I had to bet on how it will manifest, I would put my money on the struggle between the darkest faction of the GCs losing to the saner members, and them beginning to release some of their sequestered technologies. The reason why their organized suppression efforts have been totally successful is that they know if any of it makes it to the public, it will only be a matter of time before the dam breaks, which would likely include ETs openly interacting with humanity. The GCs know that if any of that happens, their days of ruling humanity will quickly end. That is partly why this hump has been so hard to get over. But I am not going to wait for something to happen at that level to save us all, and what I am attempting will also help form a nucleus of awareness that can greatly help with an enlightened and harmless implementation of FE. If FE makes its appearance, its implementation will need to be led by as many enlightened and informed people as possible. Some need to be ahead of the curve to lead the way, if only by promoting an enlightened awareness. Once people can see FE with their own eyes, preferably by having it delivered to their home (anything less, and they will not awaken; they will not be talked into an abundance-based mentality; they must experience it ), the awakening process should be pretty rapid, especially if there is already an abundance choir singing.

I found that if people are candidates for the choir, they are so rare that there will not be anybody in their daily lives who also is. The maximum social circle that most people can manage is a few hundred people, but I am looking for something like 1-in-5,000 (it might be as auspicious as 1-in-1,000, but I have my doubts, and might be a far smaller proportion) so the odds are that those prospective choir members will not have anybody among their families, friends, and colleagues who can also learn the song and sing it. That is just the reality of the numbers, which took me years of harsh learning to understand. The social-circle approach will not work for what I have in mind, but I am using a new technology with a global reach to find those needles in haystacks. Also, a primary purpose of this essay is to improve those odds. Make no mistake, it is also about the numbers, but it is like Martin Luther King, Jr. said, that he would rather march with one person who understood why they were marching than a hundred who did not. Essentially, Dennis always amassed “armies” that did not really understand the goal, and mutiny attempts came early and often.

I developed my current approach by trial and error that was extremely hazardous and painful, and took most of a lifetime to achieve. I hope that this essay can help shorten the learning curve for those whom I seek. Many readers of this essay will get bogged down early on and skip to the end, and they will get out of the experience what they put into it. Such people are not in my target audience, unless they have already mastered this essay’s material, but I have never met such a person. I will continue studying this subject matter for the remainder of my life, and have a ways to go before I could consider my grasp of it firm. This essay is largely intended to help readers develop a comprehensive awareness of life’s journey on Earth, and see where humanity enters the play. When readers can do that and come to appreciate it, they will have an easier time avoiding the egocentric levels of FE awareness (1-to-11), and reach something that might be called soul-centric. It should help them shed not only those scarcity-based ideologies and their insidious, scarcity-based assumptions, but they should also begin to understand why approaches rooted in such ideologies are doomed to failure for this task. We cannot drag our scarcity-based baggage with us for establishing a world of abundance. The GCs are masters of using people’s allegiance to those ideologies to enslave their minds and spirits. What I will be asking of my target audience will be anything but easy, and can actually be quite dangerous if caution is not exercised. But for those who use this material properly, it can imp[rove their understanding in important ways.

A great potential pitfall is judging the 99.9+% of humanity that cannot or will refuse to comprehend this essay’s message, and it is almost always their victim-oriented mindset that is their barrier to comprehension. People cannot be talked out of thinking like victims; only experience can shatter their paradigm. Brian’s question regarding whether humanity is a sentient species is fair. I call humanity semi-sentient; the potential for sentience is there, but is rarely realized, as people traded their sentience for the promise of security in a world of scarcity.

Every epochal event was a new method that tapped a level of energy that was an order of magnitude greater than the previous energy regime, and the world that it led to was unimaginable to those living immediately before the event. Berating and judging almost the entirety of humanity because they cannot imagine a world based on FE would be like judging those australopiths before their “Tesla” invented the first stone tool. Were all of those pre-stone-tool australopiths “stupid,” or was that Australo-Tesla brilliant? For each epochal event, the trends that led to the event, where one pioneer, or a relative handful of them, was able to achieve the social organization and technological prowess to tap the previously unexploited energy source, were evident in hindsight. Although those achieving the feat were extraordinary for their time, they stood on the shoulders of their ancestors and enjoyed the benefits of the culture that allowed their invention to appear. Those many arguments of denial that attend the introduction of the FE concept are normal, just like pre-fire protohumans reacting to the idea of a campfire with fear. Not until those protohumans could see a tended fire with their own eyes could they begin to comprehend it and its self-evident benefits. Those who invented the new way were extraordinary for their time, not that those who could not see or imagine it were irredeemably stupid; they were simply trapped in the prevailing paradigm. When the new energy regime appeared, everybody climbed aboard and their burgeoning sentience reached new levels, and they soon lived in a world that was previously unimaginable to everybody, even the inventor(s).

We are simply living in the pre-epochal-event stage, and are right at its brink. This time is different, however, in that the technical achievements have already been made, but those running the planet are actively preventing the epochal event from manifesting. They live in fear, just like virtually all humans do. They see their role in the world disappearing when FE makes its appearance, and are doing what they can to prevent it, just like virtually all humans would. What makes this event different is also the fact that with each epochal event the ecosystems were further pushed to the brink, as a side-effect of the energy regime, and humanity has been causing the Sixth Mass Extinction ever since that founder group left Africa. That trend is quickly reaching levels that threaten all complex life on Earth, including humanity. I sympathize with the dismay that awakening people can have toward the unawakened, who do not care what the future holds and are only interested in pursuing their immediate self-interest and surviving in a world of scarcity. They are largely impediments to FE manifesting, not allies, but they comprise nearly 100% of humanity today. It is simply how humanity has been for all time, although many wish it was different. As Machiavelli noted, people will not begin to awaken until FE becomes a part of their lives, and nobody but the founders will awaken to the new energy regime until they can experience it. I seek founders: those extraordinary people who can imagine the new energy regime before they can experience it. I do not seek to persuade those who deny FE with their many arguments, think it dangerous beyond all reason, believe that the situation is hopeless, or are stuck in the FE field’s current state of arrested development. The people I seek are needles in haystacks, but this new technology called the Internet can help me find and train them. The transition from a world based on scarcity and fear, to one of abundance and love, which is the greatest one that humanity will ever make, initially needs people who can just imagine that world, keep their attention on it, and refuse to be distracted, while infinite distractions beckon. The Fifth Epochal Event will likely not be humanity’s final such event, and there have been many hints of what that could look like (1, 2), which is an advantage that no previous epochal event had going for it.

Those people trying out all the doomed approaches to manifesting FE are to be commended, but they do not have a chance in today’s world. A new approach is needed that is aligned with the kind of world that it can help manifest. The effort needs to aim high. Concepts such as open-sourcing and crowdfunding have come from the Internet culture, and are steps in the right direction. Even high-tech potentates such as Bill Gates live relatively humbly. The Internet is a precursor to the kind of communication system that will be enjoyed in the Fifth Epochal Phase of the human journey, and I plan to use it for this new approach of manifesting FE. When love and abundance reign instead of fear and scarcity, a creator’s orientation toward life will replace the victim’s orientation. Making that future at least partly imaginable has become my life’s work, and time will tell if it makes any impact. As the great Bucky Fuller said, we are facing utopia or oblivion. Which one will we choose?

Wade Frazier
31st May 2014, 01:26
Hi:

I am getting good feedback on the essay. While I do not present the information in an intimidating way, even my scientist pals are confessing to being overwhelmed. That is OK, although it makes for getting scientific comments difficult. The choir will need to become familiar with the material, at various levels of mastery, in order to begin to develop the comprehensive perspective that I think is needed to begin understanding the song. Some quick learners will likely take on a chapter at a time, spending days or weeks on each chapter. The material is not for skimmers, and those who skip to the essay's end will get out of it what they put in. Again, I am looking for people who can do the work, and am not trying to draw a crowd.

I can see me leading "classes" on the material, and having discussions on the various subjects. They are all important, for developing a comprehensive awareness that can keep its eye on the ball. Again, this is going to be a long, slow haul. I have already lived through the quick attempts, trying to find a shortcut, and watched them go down in flames.

Any FE effort with a hope of success has to get past the arrested development that the field suffers from today, dominated by scientists, inventors, opportunists, provocateurs, messiahs, and the like. The conversations that I will lead will not be about the inventor of the hour and the like. They will be about gaining a deeper understanding of many important issues, and many areas are highly controversial. The goal will rarely be about getting the right answer, but understanding the dimensions of the controversy, what the evidence is, what seems to be the currently prevailing hypothesis, and the like.

Here is an example of the kinds of controversies that my work broaches, and has to do with the idea of a revolution. While performing the study for the essay, I continually saw where scholars and scientists would argue whether some event was really a revolution or not, and it all depended on the perspective. There are works that argue that the Scientific Revolution was not really a revolution. If people really narrow their vision, that argument might make some sense, but if they open their eyes further, its revolutionary nature is very evident, even though it arguably began with the ancient Greeks. I have even seen arguments that the Industrial Revolution was not really a revolution, but those kinds of arguments are really misleading, IMO. They were radical acts in the journey of life on Earth, and if scholars want to say they were not revolutions, then they need some new word for unprecedented events that quickly and radically changed the human journey and impacted life on Earth as dramatically as they have.

Similarly, some scholars have made the case that there was not really a wood crisis that drove England to embrace coal for smelting iron:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Darby_I#Coalbrookdale_furnace

as they scoured the record of the time, and looked for some kind of contemporary consensus that there was a wood crisis. The numbers alone are pretty obvious:

http://www.voxeu.org/article/why-was-industrial-revolution-british

I consider that the "there was not wood crisis" misleading and irrelevant to my work. The fact is that nobody ever used coal if they could use wood. Coal is nasty stuff to burn, and long after coal was used in English industry, wood was still used in homes, as nobody wanted to burn coal in their homes.

England was largely deforested thousands of years ago, and when the Domesday Survey of 1085 was made:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesday_Book

it found that England was about 90% deforested. When the Black Death came through a few centuries later, England's forests recovered a little from the depopulation, but when the first iron industry since the Romans began in the 1540s, the peasantry quickly began rioting, as the iron industry quickly decimated the forests. Not long afterward, wood-hungry England invaded Ireland and quickly raped its remaining forests. As England began its road to industrialization, Sweden, which still had woods, if no longer the big timber for ships, mast wood in particular, supplied more than a quarter of English iron. English ironworks regularly shut down due to a lack of wood, and many interests competed for English wood. There was a wood "industry" called coppicing, but it was hopelessly inadequate to keep English industry supplied with fuel and, finally, a newcomer decided to take a crack at making coke to smelt iron, and it worked. The Industrial Revolution was off and running. To say that a wood crisis was not behind the decision to go to coal I regard as kind of disingenuous. Nobody used coal if they could avoid it, and eventually wood-poor England (look at the barren hills of the British Isles even today) turned to coal out of desperation, and tapped the energy source that powered the Industrial Revolution.

It was true that nobody really knew what they were doing, as far as there being a grand plan of industrialization, or really even understanding the implications of burning fossil fuels. But just like any animal with a higher carrying capacity (getting more energy from their environment) prevails, high energy Europe with its watermills, sailing ships, forests, thick soils, and coal kicked the world's butt; the high energy societies always prevailed. Sure, there was no science of energy in 1700, but coal-smelted iron could be made cheaper than wood-smelted, and that market cheapness only reflected the energy cheapness, although there may not have been anybody in England who would have understood it that way. Like animals, people do not have to understand energy to prevail in the energy competition.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
31st May 2014, 21:12
Hi:

As I think about the essay, amidst the feedback and what I have encountered since the 1990s related to work like mine, quite a few paradigmatic understandings are lodged in the essay, and they will not dawn on many readers until long after they first read the essay. That is OK. Again, deep work is required, if a song that has never been heard in chorus on Earth before can be mounted, especially when so many forces are arrayed against it. Many of those understandings are also radically divergent from today's zeitgeist.

One of them, which will be one of the primary messages I am trying to get across, is that all epochal events were at once technical, mental, and social achievements that tapped previously unexploited energy resources. Stone tools, fire, and cooking made food energy more available, as well as allowed humanity's ancestors to leave the trees. The control of fire likely led to humanity. The ability to kill large animals moved humanity to the top of the food chain and fueled the human expansion to all the continents. Domesticating plants and animals allowed for the first sedentary humans. Harnessing fossil fuel energy created the industrialized world. Those are humanity's epochal events, and they dwarf everything else in the human journey. And for each event, they were initiated by a handful of people. Stone tools and the control of fire may have been achieved only once, and then the practice spread. Only about 250 people left Africa and conquered Earth. Only a relative handful of people domesticated plants and animals, and the practice spread. Only a relative handful of people made the innovations that made the Industrial and Scientific revolutions happen.

It will be no different for the biggest epochal event of all: the appearance of FE. It is also the hardest one to manifest. Thousands of people have independently tapped the ZPF, but various obstacles, organized suppression prominent among them, have been preventing the epochal change from manifesting. Only a relative handful of people will make FE happen, but for the attempt that I have in mind, they are thinly scattered across Earth, at less than 1-in-1,000 in the general population. The primary difference between this attempt and previous events is that the people who initiate the event will be geographically diffuse. That diffusion will actually protect the people initiating the change, as getting them all in one place would make them an easy target.

I have had people approach me, regularly, trying to make what I am doing into some mass-market effort, something they can turn their friends, family, and colleagues onto, turn it into a Hollywood production, and the like. People who think like that have yet to achieve an epochal perspective of the situation, and my essay is intended to help those needles in haystacks achieve it. Nothing about it will be easy, but the biggest event in the human journey won't be. That is partly what makes it such a big event.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Melinda
1st June 2014, 02:22
What Has Not Worked So Far and What Might, Parts 1 and 2, are great reading Wade.


if you deeply care, you are greatly needed...

I found that a moving inclusion.

Wade Frazier
1st June 2014, 04:11
Hi Melinda:

That is a message to the readers I will be looking for, coming from a place of experience. Humanity's lack of caring is the root of the human dilemma, and until people have really walked on the high road, they will not understand. There is an almost universal, "We are the good guys" rhetoric coming from all corners, and almost nobody ever lives up to it. You won't find that out until you really start to hang it out there and make a college try. For those who care and have not had the "opportunity" to play at the high levels, it is easy to think:


"All those caring people out there can handle this one. My help is not needed"


From the fake philanthropists to the fake saints, and so on, there are multitudes of people who profess to care, with all manner of environmental and humanitarian organization at varying levels of prominence. Almost without exception, they really don't. When somebody who really cares gets in position to make a difference, they often think that they are surrounded by allies. It is natural to project one's awareness on others, thinking that they are similarly motivated.

The day I met Dennis, I saw him speak in front of several hundred people, with several TV news camera crews filming, and Dennis got a standing ovation. Three months later, I saw Dennis have his company stolen in front of hundreds of people:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#salient1

and the very same people giving him a standing ovation the night I met him cheered as his company was stolen, and my boss engineered the theft. That was one of my early awakening moments. The next day, the few who were not cheering, the "loyalists," met. That was when Dennis talked about his vision of the future, but even my ears were kind of waiting for the part where we would get paid:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=838977&viewfull=1#post838977

There were about ten of us. Within about a month, I was the only person left who still was in the game. Two bowed out with honor, but the other "loyalists" betrayed Dennis, to one degree or another, with several of them later trying to extort us:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#extortion

When I arrived in Boston, after chasing Dennis out there:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#chasing

out of all those hundreds of people, I was the only one left. Dennis was surprised that anybody was, calling me an enigma when I arrived. As I look back at it, I was kind of ignoring the signs of the lessons that I was about to learn. I soon raised money to get us chasing after FE, got my friends and family involved, and the next thing I knew, we were in my hometown, going after FE. Just as we began flying high again, here came Godzilla, and the party was over. But my education was just beginning, when I saw everybody around us turn into cowards and thieves, and it was only Mr. Professor and me (and Dennis's wife) standing up to the forces of darkness. When you reject Godzilla's billion dollar offer to go away, he stops playing nice. Mr. Professor and I had our lives wrecked, but we pulled Dennis out of the hell he had been dragged into. There were only two of us, and that time, there had been thousands of people involved. I watched meeting after meeting, show after show, where Dennis got those standing ovations, and I got one, too, and the guy who led it led the effort to steal the company a few months later:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#trio

Standing ovations are just for show. When you play at those levels, you begin to realize that nobody really cares, not when it comes down to it. Again, I am not asking anybody to play at those levels, because I know almost nobody can. But, as I would soon find out, almost nobody is courageous enough to even imagine FE and a healed planet.

When I staggered out of Ventura, sobered, with my life shattered, it was not long before I was reaching out to people like Noam Chomsky, and I began to find a few other fellow travelers, like Brian O and Ralph McGehee, and we were all overgrown Boy Scouts. With all the terrible things that Ralph saw:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#saigon

he was still guilty of projecting his pure heart onto others, thinking that they were motivated like he was:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#heart

When Brian got his FE "euphoria," after visiting FE labs around the world, he played the Paul Revere of FE for several years. I had a pretty good idea of what he would find, but looked forward to hearing how it went, just trying to get his colleagues to think about FE. Five years later, when he asked if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

I sadly understood his quandary. Forget asking people to be heroes – Brian was just asking them to open their eyes and minds a little. There was nobody home, and that had everything to do with the integrity issue, where those people traded their sentience for security.

So, those who really care are very rare, and it is a great mistake to think that there is some group out there that will save the day, and that their help is not necessary. If you really care, you are desperately needed.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
1st June 2014, 13:53
Hi:

As an addendum to my previous post, when I began my FE journey with Dennis in Boston:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#chasing

his belief was that The People really cared, but did not have anything to care about. In my naïveté, I believed him. When I saw him last year, we talked a lot about the "good old days," and Dennis told me at length about the situation in Ventura and his experience. Ventura was only one of several Level 10 attempts that Dennis made. Dennis told me that when he was arrested, he fully expected that The People would camp outside the jail until he was freed. Well, The People did kind of camp outside the jail, but to call for his lynching instead. That Mr. Texas made his play:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#texas

was not too surprising, given what Dennis had already lived through, but what surprised Dennis was how everybody signed up with Mr. Texas. Within a month of Dennis's arrest, the company's doors were closed, the employees stole everything that was not nailed down, Mr. Texas's operations hived off nearly everybody else who still wanted to "do something" (the fools who did that soon got daggers in their backs), and it was just Mr. Professor and me. My life was being wrecked at that time. Going bankrupt was the least of my problems. My mother's "my son the crook" scrapbook tour:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=300436&viewfull=1#post300436

barely even registered on my radar, with all the other mayhem happening. I was betrayed right and left. When I saw Dennis last year, he said that when all that happened in the first months of his incarceration, he figured that it was over, that he would become a prison minister, and he tried to send his wife and children away to live some kind of life, and he would rejoin them in twenty years or so, if he lived to see this side of the bars again. The cowardice and betrayals among The People were shocking to see, at least initially, but when those closest to me did that, that was really my radicalizing experience.

When Mr. Professor and I busted Dennis out of jail, Dennis said it was perhaps his greatest lesson on the power of love, but he also realized that The People were not going to be much help in making FE happen, and he has been sifting through the mine tailings of humanity ever since, looking for gold nuggets. He has rarely found any.

For me, it was just a realization of the reality we live in, and The People cannot be trusted to make FE happen. They are ruled by fear, egocentric, greedy to a fault, and easily manipulated by Godzilla's minions and the social managers. We actually developed a kind of respect for the Dark Team, seeing how masterfully they managed the human herd. Godzilla also developed a grudging respect for us, trying to enlighten people who seemed incapable of it, asking the best of them and continuing to get the worst, but still trying.

When Dennis finally coaxed me into getting back in the saddle with him in 1996, I was in no shape to do it, but also saw his "army" in action once again and knew how that story would end. I did not last long with Dennis that time, and have refused his entreaties ever since, and have been developing my Level 12 approach for about the past twenty years. I let Brian O coax me into founding the Level 10-ish NEM:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#nem

but I quickly got to see the FE "field," and was far from impressed. Low integrity scientists and tinkerers, naïve newbies, and the rest, and I wanted out. Brian begged me to stay, and I stayed until we put on that first conference, and then I was gone. Brian O was soon kicked out of the organization he founded, and I was not surprised. My wife was glad that I carried Brian's spears like that, as I finally got that stuff out of my system.

I was dealing with a monster of a midlife crisis at that time, and resumed my career, working 60-hour weeks, and went quiet for years. People in my circles still prodded me to reach out, and I would, to the Free Software Movement, for instance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/freesoft.htm

but I would get these kinds of responses:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#circular

Brian O eventually came back into my life, and when he asked me to approach the DOE with him, I helped:

http://www.brianoleary.info/Impacts.html

but wondered what he thought we were going to accomplish. I had already played the DOE game with Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#yull

more than once. This is all a long way of saying that The People do not have The Right Stuff, and there are no groups of "allies" out there. I came to realize that if any group could do what I am looking for them to, to just imagine abundance and learn to sing the song, I was going to have to build the group myself, from scratch. What I have been doing at Avalon can be seen as baby steps in that task. When I publish the essay, then I will be taking the next steps, and they will be far beyond what you have seen at Avalon. We will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
1st June 2014, 14:36
As my last post this morning, before I get to chores, the almost universal response by those who glimpse what I am attempting is to try to find groups to ally with. If they get beyond the naïve idea that their friends, families, and colleagues will suddenly "get it" when encountering work like mine, they think that there are all sorts of "radical" groups out there, just waiting for me. That is not the case, and people like Brian, Dennis, and I have looked, believe me. In fact, about the only times we have been approached by "allies," they were part of a sting operation:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/other.htm#sting

where they gave a billion dollars to the Soviet Union to establish their credibility. I won't get into names, but it was a top-shelf operation, with sovereign nation involvement, penthouse suites in Manhattan, and the rest. They promised us billions of dollars in funding, but it was all an elaborate attempt to entrap us. It was likely just one of several vectors used to defeat us during that round.

A decade later, I was reaching out to Peak Oilers who actually expressed an interest in FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm

a founder of the Free Software Movement:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/freesoft.htm

(which inspired this little ditty http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#circular )

and I still reach out to the biggest names in the rad left:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm

hoping to find somebody home. Nobody has been home yet, and I realized that I would have to build the choir from scratch, and I plan to.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
1st June 2014, 14:58
I wrote this before reading Wade's posts above, but in a way it is being affected from Wade's and Melinda's above posts touching the necessary traits we need to own in ourself in order to move forward.

--------------------------------

Reading parts of Wade's essey about the four epochal events arises some questions, followed by answers for more questions to arise. Here is one example - Pre human types were always succedded by human types and were gone from the earth in this indestructible energy race where the only thing that lasts in it is the fact that we always need constant energy to remain alive, such is the physical experience. Humanity no doubt is now standing at this crossroad again with a huge technological leap where the road splits, something out of the ordinary needs to happen in order for the human race to survive and not make our planet and ourself barren. Free energy is this one thing.
From observation of where we are going it appears that, again, humanity is splitting into two different directions.

Imagin that we allow free energy out (yes, we) and changes will begin, what will make us advance this time as a more or less one single unit (from an era point of view)? I wonder what can be done to have a different outcome this time, for every living breathing soul to survive this cyclic repeated evolution. Can that at all be in our (humanity's) hands?

I ponder about it a little while and I figure Wade's comprehensive vision is rooted in a combination of things that need to exist side by side in order to 'turn the corner' and not ever meet with such choices again. Free energy is the key player, but it is not enough on its own. A growing consciousness is a necessary component and, thankfully, despite the difficulties, it's a possibility that is now present more than ever, that seems to be the needed leverage to what may follow next. Love is a component that consists of many layers, but however we may individualy define it, it ensures that no one will be intentionally left behind, integrity is going hand in hand with great responsibility on how to carefully use techonological advancments that are based on free energy and giving priority to certain things over others, at least at first. And a collective spiritual growth, the one that thrives for discovering the truthes of the cosmos and how to integrate this knowledge physically and metaphysically in a way that spells - wisdom with no mistakes.

But it all apparently depends on aqcuiring these qualities and reaching for the cosmic lifeline when it is thrown at us, and a few more adjectives such as discernment and consideration of everything. Sounds almost impossible when thinking about it, but that is what is needed in order to implement FE

Wade Frazier
1st June 2014, 16:24
Hi:

Briefly, between chores…

Limor is very perceptive.

To append my most recent posts, the masses will not begin to "get it" until they can experience FE, not hear about it. A big part of my essay, and the epochal events, is to help my readers understand that. Nobody could imagine the epochal event before it happened:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827022&viewfull=1#post827022

Today's masses are like australopiths before a Tesla among them learned to control fire, probably not long after another Tesla invented stone tools. Before then, they all feared fire, and nobody could imagine what it led to.

I am looking for needles in haystacks who can imagine FE before it is delivered to their homes. It obviously helps that I know that FE technology already exists:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#underground

But anybody who is going to begin to understand my work and goal will have already had some kind of awakening experience:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#developing

that has already helped them break out of humanity's ideological straightjackets:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

and I really cannot help them there. They must have that experience for themselves. Brian, Dennis, and I have interacted with the very tops of all "progressive" and "radical" groups on Earth, and none of them had the right stuff, and even the approach of going "to the top" is fatally flawed, IMO. I am going to the bottom, not the top.

While some of those "leaders" have gotten my time in the past, I will no longer give them my time until I see some glimmers of recognition, and them beginning to put aside their ideological teddy bears. But even if they tell their followers about me, it likely will not mean anything. Each person has to do the work, not rely on some "leader" to tell them what is worthy and what is not, to give them the abridged version, etc. I need sovereign individuals with their integrity intact, not followers, and I know they will be very rare.

Similarly, newbies want me to speak publicly, do the New Age talk circuit, and the like. That is a waste of my time and energy, not to mention dangerous, and anybody "convinced" by hearing me talk or meeting me in the flesh is not in my target audience. Those people almost always have a shallow awareness and are trying to get their social needs met, looking for an opportunity, and the like.

My essay is meeting anybody I am looking for far more than halfway. I recently loaded up my "adventures" essay with a bunch of new documents from my days with Dennis, for the evidentiary-minded:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm

The ball will be in their court to begin to do the work, and I will be there to help out those really trying, but they have to relinquish all their "bright idea" stuff and just try to master the material. My work is the fruit of a lifetime of experiences that the masses regard as a "fairy tale," "conspiracy theory," and the rest of those newcomer and enthusiast delusions. My adventures were all too real.

If even Brian's indisputable Martian credentials were assailed by the "debunkers":

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#mars

the "skeptics" and other establishment defenders/worshippers will have a field day trying to discredit me, and I have no interest in engaging them. People who are looking to see how I fare in a "debate" with them are not in my target audience.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
1st June 2014, 23:22
Betwixt chores….

This thread, if nothing else, has shown the long, slow road that I traveled to where I am today, and how I see the FE situation. The primary goal of my essay is to help my readers develop an epochal frame of mind. When I think of back to when I dreamed of changing the energy industry when I was 16, or when I met Dennis when I was 27, or when I stood in our parking lot as the raid began when I was 29, or my radicalizing moment on the witness stand later that year, or when Dennis put 5,000 people into a stadium to talk about FE when I was 38, or when I finished my site largely as it exists today when I was 44, I can see that while I was always impressed with the issue's magnitude, I did not really begin to think epochally about FE until the last several years. As I edit my energy essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm

to make the version that will be more compatible with my big essay, while I can tell that I had a pretty good grip on it in 2001, I had a ways to go to really see it in its epochal fullness. I am sure that my perspective will continue to evolve, but until people can really begin to don epochal lenses, they not only do not appreciate the magnitude of FE, they tend to fly off in all sorts of directions that are not helpful for manifesting FE.

While even the least intelligent among us understands that the world as we know it will end with FE, I have seen the subject demoted to all manner of ancillary importance by all manner of "visionary", or treated like a flavor of the day and the like, as if the idea of FE was a fashion, and if it does not happen tomorrow, well, there are always new fashions arriving on the scene to titillate people. Also, when people begin to grasp the magnitude of the issue, they can be overwhelmed, imagine that they are the messiah:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

while the audience takes them seriously, and the like. Balanced, mature, epochal perspectives of the issue are few and far between, but until more people can begin thinking that way, we are not going to manifest it, and Godzilla will ride out the storm in his survival enclaves as it all hits the fan, and soon.

As I have watched people like Dennis and Brian sacrifice their lives to the FE issue, and witnessed their trials, frustrations, and disappointments, it is easy to come to a place of resenting the blindness and egocentrism of humanity, but humanity has always been this way, which is partly behind Brian's "are humans sentient?" question. But with each epochal event, human consciousness reached a new level as it rode the energy wave.

For no previous epochal event was there any sense of perspective by those initiating the events or those benefitting from them. If work like mine can make a dent, it will be the first time in the human journey where the people initiating the event will have some sense of perspective, and also not be merely trying to solve some issue in their daily lives as they try to survive. The path that I advocate will require an unprecedented act of sentience and integrity, which is partly why nothing about this is easy. However, I think that it can work, or at least make a dent. But it is not going to fall in anybody's laps, and anybody who needs to be lured, cajoled, and the like into looking into the energy issue and FE is not going to be helpful, particularly for what I have in mind. I am not going to spend my time debating people stuck in Levels 1 through 11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level1

I did my time, and got to see what a waste of time trying to get them unstuck was. Again, at this time, my work is likely most at risk from people trying to turn it into some kind of Level 10 stampede, the flavor of the day in fringe and New Age circles, etc., who want to make the quick kill and solve the problem in the next few weeks or months. That mentality is probably the most dangerous one that I face. I watched Dennis cater to it repeatedly, and I survived the collapses more than once, and am still recovering from them. I wish I was only one of many doing this, but I am the only person on Earth that I know of trying this approach, and it is decidedly non-heroic, non-messianic, non-capitalistic, non-stampede-ish, etc. I am doing something different. My big essay will outlive me, and its impact may not really be felt until after I am gone. On a personal level I am OK with that, but if humanity does not manifest FE, and soon, humanity is in big trouble, the kind that can mean the extinction of the species while taking the ecosystems with us. I, for one, would rather that not be humanity's "legacy." I sense the time pressures, believe me, but there are no shortcuts, not for what I have in mind, and I highly doubt that any quick-and-dirty methods of bringing FE to the world will work.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
2nd June 2014, 00:51
Hi:

Between chores…

When my family went "health nut" when I was 12, and my fascination with the unusual (like Frank Edwards's books when I was 13-14 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Edwards_%28writer_and_broadcaster%29), and my mystical awakening when I was 16, I was quite aware of the fringes. My first professional mentor inventing the world's best engine during those same years:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#glimpse

and my scientific curriculum into college, gave me an unusual perspective at an early age. After my first stint with Dennis, as I hit the books:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#books

I quickly discovered the rad left and media analysis, as well as stuff like Naessens's and Rife's microscopes:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#rife

and was becoming immersed in a wide array of fringe topics, including studying the "skeptics." I got sucked into the fringes of catastrophism, alternative medicine, "revisionist" history, the space programs and UFOs, conspiratorial activities, and so on. While much of it was thought-provoking and I knew that some was valid, I also came to realize that a lot of fringe stuff was invalid, but it did not matter how thoroughly it was shown to be invalid, there was an endless parade of fringe enthusiasts who lapped it up, and as my profile on the Internet rose, I became besieged with people who tried to get me to look into their fringe area. I often gave them my time, and often peered into their areas, and went deep on quite a few of them. While plenty was legit, plenty really failed to withstand my scrutiny, where even if seemingly valid, was far more conjectural than the enthusiast presented. There seemed to be outright fraud at times, but mostly it just seemed to be overeager enthusiasts, sloppy work, people failing to admit when they were wrong, and the like. All too often, the fringe investigator tried to make a living, and New Age and fringe circles were filled with male "leaders" whose primary preoccupations seemed to be getting paid and laid. For every real McCoy, there were a hundred pretenders, who usually had gullible followings, groupies, and the like.

In the study for writing the essay, my work ended up convincing me that many fringe areas, that I hear no end of, are very likely invalid. I did not set out to test those fringe areas, but showing their invalidity was just a side-effect of my work, and areas in particular were:

1. Celestial and geological catastrophes in the Holocene Epoch;

2. Advanced (or ET) technology building the megalithic architecture in early civilizations;

3. ET explanations for "missing links" in the fossil record.

While uniformitarianism prevailed since Lyell, and Darwin made it a foundation of his evolutionary theories, that has largely fallen by the wayside, beginning with the asteroid hypothesis for the dinosaurs' demise. Sh*t happens, but mass extinctions of complex life due to celestial events likely only happened that one time. But all manner of catastrophic theorist has proposed catastrophes for all sorts of events in the past 12,000 years, but the only "catastrophes" on a geophysical scale were the melting of the ice sheets, which reversed the thermohaline current:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermohaline_circulation

and many mammoths were buried in floods when ice dams broke. But the idea that either celestial events or floods wiped out the mammoths is wishful thinking. Mammoths went extinct along with all the other megafauna when humans conquered the planet. The only megafauna that survived that holocaust were those that evolved alongside humans in Africa and Eurasia. As far as I am concerned, as well as almost any scientist who has looked into the issue in any depth, humans were solely responsible for that disaster. So catastrophists who argue for bolide events, floods, and the like, have even less credibility than the climate change advocates.

Also, literalist interpretations of ancient writings have come up short, with Velikovsky's and Sitchin's work of literal interpretation of mythological writings way off base, IMO. Archeologists can find little support for the tales in the Old Testament. The Old Testament was about 10% fact and about 90% fantasy. Similar distortion occurred in all the sacred writings supporting all religions, with the urban priesthoods twisting everything into a means of social control in service to the elite. That is a universal dynamic, across all early civilizations.

Similarly, all early civilizations had elites who clambered to the top and played their games. All early civilizations were Stone Age civilizations, and all had monumental architecture that aggrandized the elite. I know of no exceptions, and it was always a way for the elite to buttress their position. In Stone Age civilizations, the people got good at working in stone. The precision of their work has led many enthusiasts to theorize that they had ET technology, that they had some Atlantean technology, etc. Damn, they worked in stone! Stone is not exactly an advanced material. If they had advanced technologies, don’t you think they would have worked in advanced materials, not rock? It was only when I begin surveying the rise and fall of all early civilizations, and seeing similar monumental architecture erected for all of them, and studying the archeological and scientific findings, that all those explanations that invoked ETs and arcane technologies really began to look like a big stretch. There are many areas of archeology and studying ancient civilizations where there is still plenty of mystery. The domestication of maize has been one of the enduring controversies of domestication. It was about the most impressive feat of domestication, likely taking a couple thousand years, but nobody has needed to invoke ET influence.

Similarly, ET enthusiasts and those against the idea of evolution (only non-scientists really think that way) continually invoke some kind of ET intervention in the human line, to explain the "missing links." There are no missing links, not where any scientist has to invoke some kind of intervention, either divine or ET in nature. I am not saying that there is not one heck of a lot more than meets the eye happening, but enthusiasts who invoke ETs, God, Atlantis, comets, and the like, for issues where the scientists are doing quite well with geophysics, geochemistry, archeology, and biology, are barking up the wrong tree, and that stuff creates the three-ring-circus atmosphere that shoves the important stuff to the side or buries it in disinformation and the like. My work has little room for such fringe stuff anymore.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
2nd June 2014, 16:10
Hi Wade,

I respect a person at his home, so I will ask to only be allowed a two short paragraphs on the subject of ET's with some relevence to what you wrote above. I believe the ET issue is as vast and urgent to our awarness as the FE is right now, not in the broader aspect of it, as energy is the top and bottom line of everything, but with the fact that it exists and has quite a bit of a hidden effect on our immediate lives, with implication on the energy subject as well. The collaboration of our government and ET's unbeknowest to most may ineed determine our future as a collective and as individuals, I have personally come to the understanding that much as the same with FE, it is not acknowledged properly. Needles in haystack are needed here as well :)

White science may seem to cover the journey of human evolution with the toolbox it has under it's possession, but it is lacking, it is assuming and is limited. One can not claim a proper understanding of free energy from white science and the same is (pretentious, I know) with human evolution. Under formal scientific laws - Free energy does not exist as under general human 'law' - the ET's do not exist. I think one can get my drift :) If we will manage to go through a couple of hurdles thrown at us, that may not be such an issue in the future, but with no consciousness or awarness with regards to it that may be quite a challange to obtain. Much the same as with FE there are also viable physical risks, but it is mostly about our own perceptions that will have to break with regards to what we think we know, in order for us to percieve and gain a deeper and more proper knowledge of the truth of our reality and what it consists of. I see where you are comming from, Wade, and it resonates. It may not be the common knowledge that is out there in the thousands and all the 'fringe and new age staff' that will help provide us with this deeper understanding that we need to aquire, but the long way is requested to be taken to understand and experience ourselvs and how things work. It is essential for the choices we have to make as citizens of this planet, these things are not as black or white as most present them to be, as always there's an array of middle colors, best observed within a spiritual context while allowing the heart to lead, very much like with FE.

I'm sorry for the deviation from the trail of this thread

All the best,

Limor

Wade Frazier
2nd June 2014, 16:23
Hi Limor:

That does not deviate at all. The key issue is discernment in all things, and it has been really something to watch people get lost in the weeds, in both the mainstream and in the fringes. Direct personal experience is always best, and lacking that, events that can be reproduced by anybody is the next best (called experiments). As Seth once said, dogma is always the enemy, and the history of humanity is full of people denying what their eyes told them because they believed differently. Opening our eyes, on all fronts, is what my work is ultimately about. That also means relinquishing beliefs when there is nothing to support them other than somebody's theory, sloppy reconstruction and analysis of the evidence, and the like. The rigor that scientists ideally use is a worthy approach that all-too-often fails, both in the mainstream and fringes. Add in the corrupting influences of getting paid and laid, and reality can get distorted beyond all recognition as people pursue their self-serving agendas.

This morning, I have been editing this section of my energy essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

and there is not much that I am going to change about it.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
2nd June 2014, 16:43
Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "discernment "


"Direct personal experience"


" Opening our eyes"


"relinquishing beliefs"


"rigor"


Enough said ~

Wade Frazier
2nd June 2014, 18:51
Hi Limor:

I am happy that is enough for you, but I will expand on it a little. What I noticed in my studies was that people were indoctrinated into believing tales, whether it was the Bible, the history books, and even scientific findings:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/intro.htm#blinded

and from that day forth, it formed assumptions in the foundation of the pupil's paradigm, or in other words, a faith. It was not anything that the pupil got from direct experience, but something that an authority figure told them was true. The pupils/victims then carved those stories into their worldview and even personal identity, but more often than not, those tales were lies carefully crafted to entrap their minds and spirits. People then defend their beliefs to the death. That kind of behavior is why Brian wondered if humanity is a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

And I have seen that even when people gain some kind of experience that might open their eyes beyond those beliefs, those beliefs end up coloring their experience, often in a way that distorts or invalidates it. For example, Dennis was raised with Christian indoctrination, but really did not believe it. When he had his moment of awakening, of realizing that the nationalism sold him from his cradle was a crock, as he was in the process of committing suicide, a voice piped up in his head:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#voice

Dennis calls that voice God, and soon afterward, he became a literalist Christian, and will likely die a literalist Christian. Not many years after Dennis first heard his voice, I heard mine, in far less dramatic circumstances:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice

but I was not raised with heavy religious indoctrination, and I have no idea who that voice in my head was, and I do not want to hear from it anymore. With Dennis's preposterous journey, he can be forgiven for calling the voice "God," but seeing that he is also arguably the person on Earth who has come the closest to manifesting the biggest event in the human journey, maybe it is "God." I sure do not know, but if anybody is doing God's work, it is people like him.

But Dennis, for instance, will never read my essay (he watches TV, and rarely reads), and even if he did, the evolutionary tale that my essay tells would offend his Christian sensibilities, which in the USA usually means denying that evolution is a real process. Similarly, the evidence adduced by archeologists and other scientist/scholars shows pretty clearly that the stories of the Old Testament are largely fabrications by the priesthood, partly to forge a national identity for some small kingdoms wedged between regional powers. Major stories about Jesus in the New Testament were already circulating in the local regions of the day (virgin birth, resurrection), and are likely just more fairy tales that the priesthood concocted. The priesthoods did that with all religions, so why the hell do people take any of that stuff literally? Largely because they had them drilled into their heads while children, and they will never let it go. It is like an 80-year-old still believing in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. While there are often valid realities behind the symbolism, taking it literally is one of the big downsides of the human ability to think abstractly, where people mistake symbols for reality. Again, this happens with history, science, and many other areas supposedly run by sober adults.

When I have seen people challenge the reality of Dennis's experiences, or Brian's, or mine, their challenge invariably comes in the form of pure denial. They just cannot believe that any of those things happened, even when they are exceedingly well documented:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#hitting

I have had people challenge the billion dollar bribe that Dennis received:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

and not because they did not believe that such bribes happen, but they had not encountered one that large, which betrayed their inexperience and lack of discernment. The inventor tinkering in his garage may get the $10 million offer, as we initially did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#ten

but Dennis is the only person in world history who actually put disruptive energy technology on the market in a way that was potentially disruptive. No scientist or tinkerer ever played close to at that level, and that is when they get Godzilla's full attention, not when they are tinkering or theorizing.

Similarly, I was blown away when "debunkers" challenged Brian's Martian credentials:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#mars

when the astronaut corps had no problem with it, and if the debunkers had bothered doing minimal homework, Brian's Martian credentials were not even remarkable, as far as being bizarre or unbelievable. NASA had big plans for Mars when Brian was hired, and he was the only planetary scientist hired to be an astronaut during the Apollo program. So, what kind of cherished fantasies or outright ignorance were those challengers protecting? Whatever they were, those people were protecting their beliefs from being invalidated by reality. This is a universal human failing, and my work is about overcoming it, in all areas.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd June 2014, 15:39
Hi:

The feedback on the essay draft is coming in. Nobody is pointing out any scientific boners so far, which is what I am looking for the most. But I am still getting good feedback, mostly along the lines of how to make the essay easier to read, and one good suggestion was making chapter summaries, and I will devote a lot of today to that task. I am only a few chapters into it, and the overwhelming nature of the material is evident to even me.

But the overwhelming nature of it is good stuff, as there is a great deal to chew on, and the very process of chewing is part of what I am looking for, because that is how people can begin to develop comprehensive perspectives. Make no mistake - the development of comprehensive perspectives is what the essay is largely all about. When enough people can gain that perspective, they will keep their eye on the ball and the path to manifesting FE is going to become a whole lot easier. Of course, people have to start with their hearts in the right place, first. I suppose that the readers have to have a little "faith" that I know what I am doing, asking them to break their brains on that material. It is intended to raise their awareness to the levels where a mature perspective of the situation can be attained. When people can achieve that perspective, the path to FE should become pretty clear, and I won’t be as vital to the effort. I really do not want to be the kingpin, as Godzilla takes out kingpins.

Again, I am not setting my pupils loose in some kind of void, but will be there to help. However, it is going to take a great deal of gumption to begin to master the material and develop a comprehensive perspective. Scientists are not sure if my approach will work, in that people without scientific training may not have the mental horsepower to handle the many complex ideas and information that go into developing comprehensive perspectives. But if the choir is all scientists, my idea might not work, as they have their own limitations. I really need people outside of the professional scientist realm to begin to step up.

Nice to see Robert honing his chops over here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32475-Free-Energy-Transition-plans-for-Earth&p=840741#post840741

:)

If nothing else, Robert is getting experience in engaging people without the slightest idea what my work is about. In the long run, I am not interested in interacting with such people. My essay is intended to eliminate the "need" to do that. It is going to be the very rare person who will be willing and able to digest my work and attain the comprehensive perspectives that will be needed to be a member of the choir. As I have stated plenty, FE newbies always want to tell their friends, family, and colleagues the "good news" about FE, and if they are lucky, they will not wreck any relationships or careers doing that, but some of that kind of work can help them understand the levels below Level 12:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level1

People are almost always stuck in their level for life (at least until FE is delivered to their homes). I am really looking for Level 0s who will have the right stuff to not get stuck in those lower levels, probably with a little help from me. I was "stuck" playing a Level 10 spear carrier for several years, and I know all those lower levels intimately, I am almost sorry to say.

Back to work,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd June 2014, 21:46
Boy, I just spent several hours making a new table, making the essay under-friendlier...

Here are the most significant energy events in the history of Earth and the history of Life

The Most Significant Energy Events in Earth's and Life's History as of 2014

Energy Event Timeframe Significance
Nuclear fusion begins in the Sun
c. 4.6 billion years ago (“bya”) Provides the power for all of Earth's geophysical and ecological systems.

Life on Earth begins
c. 3.8 – 3.5 bya Organisms begin to capture chemical energy.

Enzymes appear
c. 3.8 – 3.5 bya Speed up chemical reactions by millions of times, making all but simplest life possible.

Photosynthetic organisms first appear
c. 3.4 bya Organisms begin to directly capture solar energy.

Oxygenic photosynthesis first appears
c. 3.5 – 2.8 bya Generates oxygen that complex life will later use, makes non-aquatic life possible, and also preserves the global ocean.

Aerobic respiration first appears
c. 2.4 – 1.8 bya Allows for more energetic respiration than anaerobic respiration.

Complex cells first appear (eukaryotic)
c. 2.1 – 1.6 bya Allows for larger cells and far greater energy generation capacity –pound for pound, a complex cell uses energy 100,000 times as fast as the Sun creates it.

First chloroplast created
c. 1.6 – 0.6 bya Allowed for direct energy capture of complex life, and led to plants.

Dramatic climb in atmospheric oxygen begins, to eventually achieve modern levels, begins c. 850 million years ago ("mya") Creates conditions for complex life to appear.

First animal appears
c. 760 to 665 mya First large-scale energy users.

Deep oceans oxygenated
c. 580 - 560 mya Creates conditions for complex life to appear, first in the global ocean.

Cambrian Explosion begins
c. 541 mya First complex ecosystems appear.

Teeth appear
c. 540-530 mya Concentration of muscle energy.

Reef ecosystems appear
c. 513 mya The most complex aquatic ecosystems appear.

Land plants appear
c. 470 mya Energetic basis for land-based ecosystems appear.

Land animals appear
c. 430-420 mya Ability to create non-aquatic ecosystems.

Jaws appear
c. 420 mya Great energy manipulation enhancement.

Vascular plants appear
c. 410 mya Ability to create vertical ecosystems.

Trees appear
c. 385 mya Largest organisms ever, and greatest energy storage and delivery to any biome, and become basis for coal.

Fish migrate to land
c. 375 mya Precursor for dominant animals to appear.

Seed-reproducing plants appear
c. 375 mya Ability to colonize dry lands.

Amniotes appear
c. 320-310 mya Ability to survive in dry lands.

Lignin-digesting organism appears
c. 290 mya Ability to make tree-stored energy available to ecosystems.

Dinosaurs appear
c. 231 mya Among the first terrestrial animals with upright posture, enabling great aerobic capacity and domination of terrestrial environments.

Tools first used
c. 400-200 mya? Conferred energy advantage to tool user.

Flowering plants appear
c. 160 mya Great energy innovation to reduce reproductive costs, and animals are the beneficiary, acting as reproductive enzymes in greatest symbiosis of plant and animal life, allowing flowering plants to dominate terrestrial ecosystems.

The control of fire
c. 2.0-1.0 mya Allowed protohumans to leave trees, become Earth's dominant predator, alter ecosystems, and cooked food helped spur dramatic biological changes, including encephalization in human line.

Projectile weapons invented
c. 400 thousand years ago ("kya") Changed the terms of engagement with prey, reducing hunting risk of large animals and increasing effectiveness.

Boat invented
c. 60 kya Allowed for first low-energy transportation, and ability to travel to unpopulated continents.

Widespread domestication of plants and animals
c. 10 kya Provided the local and stable energy supply that allowed for sedentary human populations and civilization.

First metal smelted
c. 7 kya Allowed for tools highly improved over stone, for greater energy effectiveness of human activities.

Plow invented
c. 7 kya Allowed for greatly increased energy yields from agriculture.

First sailboat invented
c. 6 kya First technology to take advantage of non-biological energy.

Wheel invented
c. 5.5 kya Reduced energy use for ground-based transportation.

Coal first burned
c. 5-4 kya First use of non-biomass for chemical energy.

Iron first smelted
c. 4.5 kya Allowed for vastly improved tools.

Watermill invented
c. 2.2 kya First time the energy of the hydrological cycle harnessed for use on land.

Windmill invented
c. 2.0 kya First time wind is harnessed for use on land.

Steam engine invented
c. 2.0 kya First time the motive power of fire is harnessed.

Coal used to smelt metal
c. 1.0 kya First use of non-biomass to smelt metal

Europe learns to sail across the world's oceans
The years 1420 – 1522, common era Turning global ocean into low-energy transportation lane allows Europe to conquer the world.

First use of coal for smelting metal in England
1709 First act of Industrial Revolution

First commercial steam engine built
1710 First time the motive power of fire is harnessed to perform work.

First practical use of electricity
c. 1805 New way to use energy would revolutionize civilization.

First commercial oil well drilled
1859 The most coveted fuel of the Industrial Revolution is first used.

Incandescent lighting first commercialized
c. 1880 First commercial use of electricity.

Alternating current technology prevails over direct current
1891 The major technical hurdle to electrifying civilization is overcome.

First attempt to create "free energy" technology is abandoned due to lack of funding
1903 This event inaugurates the era of organized suppression of free energy technologies.

First man-powered flight, and establishment of first company to mass-produce automobiles
1903 Major transpiration developments begin to be powered by petroleum.

Albert Einstein published his special theory of relativity and equation for converting mass to energy
1905 Forms the framework for 20th century physics, including the energy that can be liberated from an atom's nucleus.

British Navy converts from coal to oil
1911 Provided incentive for oil-poor United Kingdom to dominate the oil-rich Middle East.

Oil-rich Ottoman Empire dismembered by industrial powers, establishing imperial and neocolonial rule in Middle East 1918 The West invades the Middle East and has yet to leave, lured by the oil.

USA harnesses the atom's power, and first use is vaporizing two cities, and the greatest period of economic prosperity in history begins
1945 The nuclear age is born, as well as the Golden Age of capitalism.

The USA's national security state is born, Roswell incident
1947 By this time, free energy technology has likely been either developed or acquired.

Electrogravitic research goes black
1950s This is the final technology, along with free energy technology, to make humanity a universally prosperous and space-faring species.

The USA reaches Peak Oil
1970 The decline in the American standard of living begins

Former astronaut nearly dies immediately after rejecting the American military's UFO research "offer"
1990s The incident is one of many that demonstrate that the UFO issue is very real, but happened by somebody close to me.

A close personal friend is shown free energy and antigravity technologies, among others; and another close friend had free energy technology demonstrated
1980-1990s Those incidents are two of many that demonstrate that the free energy suppression issue is very real, but were witnessed by people close to me.

The world reaches Peak Oil
2006 The beginning of the end of industrial civilization.

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is history's largest
2010 More evidence of how dangerous humanity's current energy production methods are.

The Fukushima nuclear event is likely history's greatest 2011 More evidence of how dangerous humanity's current energy production methods are.

Wade Frazier
3rd June 2014, 21:51
Hi:
Here is an example of what those chapter summaries will look like:


Early Life on Earth

Chapter summary:
• Appearance of life on Earth, and its energetic basis
• Role of DNA, enzymes, ATP, and cellular membranes
• Basic aspects of life
• Biochemistry, geochemical cycles, and entropy
• Respiration and photosynthesis
• Split of bacteria and archaea
• Oxygenic photosynthesis, the Great Oxygenation Event, and formation of the ozone layer and iron deposits
• Formation of the continents, plate tectonics, and the first ice age
• Development of the complex cell and its energy centers - the mitochondria - and mitochondrial DNA
• Development of aerobic respiration
• Free radicals and cell death
• Formation of supercontinents
• Evolutionary struggles, the appearance of plants, sexual reproduction, grazing, and predation
• One-way path of evolution

I am mainly just linking to where that discussion is made, but these summaries and that new timeline are causing me to make some small tweaks, as I bring my mind onto the subject from a slightly different direction.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd June 2014, 22:09
Hi:

As I have to think about the essay from different directions as I field comments and tweak the essay, I think about new ways to present the ideas. One of them came to me a few minutes ago. Here is what can disappear in a few years with the implementation of FE:

1. Air and water pollution;

2. Poverty;

3. Hunger;

4. Warfare;

5. Raping the environment.

Those would be the first to go, and they would be easy with FE. The rest is almost gravy. Of course, for people who have never heard or thought of FE, that knocks them completely sideways. However, my essay shows how easy those are to remedy, and one of them have anything to do with human nature, but how humans operate under scarcity. I get that most people alive today will likely go to their graves in a state of disbelief that those conditions can go the way of slavery and buggy whips, but the next generation would be raised in a world where they could scarcely believe that those were integral parts of the human condition for the entirely of civilization.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
3rd June 2014, 23:58
Man, these are busy chapters:


Complex Life Colonizes Land
Chapter summary:
• Ordovician expansion
• Second Tethyan ocean begins forming
• First modern-looking reefs form
• Rise of mollusks
• Issues of gigantism and dwarfism
• Dominance of nautiloids
• First land plants appear
• Ordovician extinction
• Ice age begins and ends
• Reefs greatly expand in Silurian
• First land animals appear
• Fish develop first jaws
• Silurian extinction events
• Bony fish appear in Devonian
• Fish migrate to land
• Amphibians appear
• Lignin allows for vascular plants and trees to develop
• Seed plants appear
• Trees appear
• Challenges of migrating to land
• Plants create riverbanks
• Oxygen levels crash, making breathing difficult for new migrants to land
• Land ecosystems pull carbon from atmosphere, which initiates ice age
• Devonian reefs become greatest in Earth's history
• Series of Devonian extinction events
• End-Devonian extinction halts vertebrate migration to land

I have lots of friends in Hollywood, and I often get the "how to we make this a bestseller or a movie?" responses. But this is not about that. The essay is essentially a textbook. I am avoiding all Level 10 suggestions of making this into some kind of mass marketed vehicle for a stampede, so we get The Muppet Movie ending! :) It is not the time for that, and likely will not be until FE makes its appearance. I learned many harsh lessons of the media game during my journey with Dennis and Brian. I am doing something different.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 00:45
Hi:

We will see if they all look like this:


Making Coal, the Rise of Reptiles, and the Greatest Extinction Ever
Chapter summary:
• Vertebrates resume their invasion of land after 14 million years
• Structural respiration limitation for amphibians and early reptiles
• Oxygen levels rise to highest ever on Earth, caused by first rainforests
• Giant arthropods appear
• Amniotes appear
• Sharks and ray-finned fish rise to dominance
• Ice age leads to Carboniferous rainforest collapse, ending greatest period of coal formation in Earth's history
• Lignin digesting white rot appears, ending possibility of a comparable coal-building period happening again
• Tethys Ocean begins forming in the Permian
• Conifer forests appear
• Pangaea supercontinent forms
• Synapsids dominate terrestrial biomes
• Early instance of display features for sexual selection
• Reptiles develop more upright posture, improving breathing, while oxygen levels crash
• First extinction event of Permian extinction
• Volcanism ends ice age and initiates 200 million year Greenhouse Earth phase
• Animals adapt to low oxygen levels
• Mammalian ancestors appear
• Reefs begin recovering from Devonian extinction
• Greatest extinction event ever

I was always planning on having some images that accompany the essay, and I have some, but writing the essay took precedence over images. I made several of the images myself, and will be getting permission for one of them, and the essay as I originally wrote it linked to a bunch of images, but I am probably going to move a bunch of those images into the essay, especially the Wikipedia ones, where there is not an issue with reproducing them.

I can see future editions having more images, but this version will be lighter than many will likely want.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 01:33
This is kind of fun, kind of a "this is the past year of your life" exercise, as I can see what I have writing about for the past year. Every one of those items triggers memories of my studies, and doing this exercise makes the connections between the sections, event-wise and conceptually, clearer. So far, it has not triggered any "oh hell, I missed that part," thoughts. It also flow pretty well, chronologically. Not perfectly, but it really does not jump around much, but stays pretty close to the timeline.


The Reign of Dinosaurs
Chapter summary:
• Ecosystems begin slow recovery from Permian extinction
• Lystrosaurus dominates Pangaea
• Archosaurs begin rise to dominance
• Stony corals dominate post-Permian reefs
• Tethys Ocean grows, and eventually form most of the today's oil deposits
• Early Mesozoic was a low oxygen time
• Volcanism prevalent in Mesozoic, and its carbon dioxide emissions maintain Greenhouse Earth conditions
• Reptiles migrate to oceans and dominate them
• Dinosaurs appear
• Scientists' recently changing views on dinosaurs
• Mass extinction marks dinosaurs' appearance
• Controversies over thermoregulation
• Controversies over dinosaurian air sac breathing system
• Ornithischian dinosaurs appear
• Dinosaur intelligence
• Archosaurs learn to fly
• Mammals appear
• Triassic extinction
• Archosaurs invade freshwater environments and become crocodiles
• Jurassic period begins Golden Age of dinosaurs
• Sauropod diet
• Flowering plants appear and form symbiosis with animals
• Birds appear
• Why birds live so long
• Territoriality
• Armored dinosaurs appear
• As Pangaea breaks up, Atlantic Ocean forms
• Mesozoic anoxic events form most of world's oil deposits
• Mid-Jurassic extinction
• End-Jurassic extinction
• Dramatic ocean rise in Cretaceous
• Indian Ocean forms
• World-circling equatorial current
• Calcite and aragonite seas
• Rudist bivalves displace stony coral reefs
• Mid-Cretaceous extinction
• Late-Cretaceous extinction
• End-Cretaceous extinction: what survived and why

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 02:10
We will see if I get another one of these done tonight.


The Age of Mammals
Chapter summary:
• Recovery from the Cretaceous extinction
• Development of mammals
• Mammalian reproductive practices
• Ecological guilds
• Mammalian convergent evolution with dinosaurs
• Mammals reach maximum size
• Hindgut and foregut digestion
• Primate development
• Non-mammalian apex predators of Cenozoic
• Rise of grass and C4 carbon fixation
• Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
• Eocene's Golden Age of Life
• Mammals migrate to oceans and become whales
• Mammals easily migrate between continents via Arctic region
• India, Africa, and Arabia begin colliding with Eurasia, forming mountain ranges
• How geological processes make oil
• New Zealand's bird-dominated biomes evolve in isolation until humans arrive
• 200-million-year Greenhouse Earth phase ends, and Earth begins cooling
• Mid-Eocene extinction
• End-Eocene extinction largely confined to Europe
• Antarctic ice sheet begins developing
• Original whales go extinct, and cold-water adapted whales appear
• Africa evolves in isolation; elephants appear
• Monkeys appear
• Many modern mammal families appear
• Oligocene warms into Miocene
• Global currents dramatically change
• Asian invasion of North America
• Africa collides with Eurasia, and mass cross-migration begins
• South America and Australia evolve in isolation
• Mid-Miocene cooling; Greenland ice sheets begin to develop
• Cause of mid-Miocene cooling
• Mountain-building events
• Grasslands appear
• Mammals adapt to eating dry-climate plants
• Tethys Ocean finally disappears
• Pliocene Epoch and Great American Interchange
• Changing ocean currents initiate current ice age
• Ice Age begins, along with Quaternary Period

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 02:38
OK, maybe the last one tonight.



The Path to Humanity
Chapter summary:
• Old World and New World monkeys split
• Africa becomes primate refuge
• Monkeys evolve into apes
• Miocene apes migrate from Africa
• Apes ancestral to humans
• Apes migrate back to Africa
• Ape/human terminology
• Great ape diet
• Human/chimpanzee split
• Early human line fossils
• Human line becoming bipedal
• Ardi
• Lucy
• Mammal/ape/human intelligence
• Ape dimorphism
• Mammalian investment in offspring
• Monkey/ape/human social bonding activities
• Life requirements
• How simians prevents inbreeding
• The benefits of bipedalism
• Human ancestor similarities with macaques
• First stone tools

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 03:16
The last one of tonight. I'll finish it up in the morning.


Humanity’s First Epochal Event(s?): Growing our Brains and Controlling Fire

Chapter summary:

• Macaque social organization
• Chimp and orangutan culture
• The human line brain begins growing
• First stone tool culture
• Human brain compared to ape brains
• Social navigation and brain requirements
• Energy tradeoffs with brain growth
• Chimp and gorilla diets and digestion
• Appearance of Homo habilis
• Campfires and predators
• Chimp coalitionary killing
• Appearance of Homo erectus
• Extinction of humanity's cousins
• The human evolutionary tree
• Turkana Boy and anatomical changes in Homo erectus
• Controversies over human-line descent
• The control of fire and human-line evolution
• Human line sleeping on the ground
• The Cooking Hypothesis
• First human line migration from Africa
• Second stone tool culture
• Nutrition and brain development
• What fire is
• Fire as first great human ecosystem robbery
• Non-geological timescale definition of "epochal"
• Imagining where the control of fire and stone tools would lead
• Ice age impact on human evolution
• The origin of spoken language
• Bonobo social organization and overcoming male violence
• "Out of Africa" and multiregional theories of human evolution
• A million years of stagnant human culture
• The fertile nexus of Africa, Asia, and Europe
• Appearance of Homo heidelbergensis
• Human transition from hunted to hunter
• Improving Middle Stone Age toolset
• Neanderthals appear
• Neanderthals invent third stone tool culture
• Homo sapiens appears
• Ice age impacts on human movements
• First Homo sapiens migration past Africa
• DNA evidence for founder population that left Africa

Limor Wolf
4th June 2014, 09:02
Hi:

Here is what can disappear in a few years with the implementation of FE:

1. Air and water pollution;

2. Poverty;

3. Hunger;

4. Warfare;

5. Raping the environment.

Those would be the first to go, and they would be easy with FE. The rest is almost gravy. Of course, for people who have never heard or thought of FE, that knocks them completely sideways. However, my essay shows how easy those are to remedy, and none of them have anything to do with human nature, but how humans operate under scarcity.

Reading Wade's essey and above words, it is not always easy to understand how FE society will look like when it comes to the smaller details.

For example - can it naturally be assumed that when the nature around us will be restored, society will completely separate from the urban way of life (despite it's social advantages) and will go back to a more agricaltural life style? Or maybe a new type of living will develop instead which will involve the advantages of both worlds?

Provided people are being fed from vegetables and grains as well as from fruit, how would an agricultural society would look like in the Free Energy era?

Water and organic fertilizer would not be a problem anymore and neither the operation of machinery. The sun will always continue to be a viable necessary nourishment for our existance as well as for the crops, and weather as a whole will be a lot more stable, harmonious even, and that may serve as a great back up and support for growing our food. I am not sure when it comes to plowing the land, how can that be avoided? but pharmacalture may give an answer to that, if not now then with time. Or, perheps ancient wisdom will have to come to the surface and complement our way.. :)

One thing appears more and more clear, we have to change our relationship with the soil, the plants and the earth (as well as with ourselves). From reading the parts of the essey on the period that is after the hunters and gatherers, the sedentary agricaltural societies - as comfortable and energy savey as they were in compared to what preceded earlier, and to the city structures that formed all the while and after, these are still far from idealic and were characterized by most of the known illnesses including hierarchy and defined roles and sustaining which is not really sustaining.. not for long, anyway. It looks like free energy has the potential to not only liberate our dependence on disposable and abusive energy resources, but to also liberate our minds and open us as a species to other endless possibilities. But how in god's name can we even begin to imagine that ?

All the best,

Limor

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 12:43
Hi Limor:

Food would not be raised on the land. The "farm" would be self-contained, and can be in the "basement" of the house, and the "house" could be on Mars or floating in the Kuiper Belt.

If people can instantly communicate with anybody, and travel the globe in a few minutes, I doubt that they would want to live in anything resembling one of today's cities.

In that world that Roads visited:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

there were outdoor farms, but I will bet that there were also plenty of indoor ones. There was certainly nothing like a "pest" or a "weed" in that world. I do not expect to see that world in my lifetime, but commandeering an ecosystem for human benefit I would hope would be one of the first ideas that goes away in an FE-based world, along with the invasion mentality.

That world had urban environments, but they were integrated with nature in a way that is hard to believe, and it looks like people may not have lived there. The advantages of urban life become very slim ones when all of the amenities of today's urban life and more can be had while living in a natural setting. If cities survived, they would look nothing like they do today. Energy scarcity is the primary reason for cities.

With FE, no, the Sun is really not necessary. We would not need its energy. We will still take it, but we would not need it. That is how we can become space-faring.

You are right in that 99.9% of humanity cannot imagine much of that. They cannot even imagine FE and are afraid of its implications, just like australopiths would have been afraid of fire before they saw a campfire. I am looking for the equivalent of australopiths who can imagine a campfire and its benefits and not fear it. If enough of us can imagine the campfire without fearing it, without giving the million reasons why a campfire is undesirable and dangerous, then we can have it. Godzilla uses the campfire every day and enjoys its benefits, and his primary goal is making sure that we cannot even imagine a campfire, or when we do, fear overwhelms us and we scurry back up our trees to sleep. I can tell that the "campfire" analogy is going to be one of those that I use regularly in the future. :)

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 13:00
Hi:

Related to the previous post, again, the changes will be so radical and profound that the world will not be recognizable. There are many aspects of history's richest and most powerful nation that I can see as embryonic versions of the future, as well as much that would disappear, and the parts that will survive are part of our unprecedented wealth.

For instance, go to the Third World, and people ride scooters that regularly crash and tear the riders in half, or roads that wind along mountainsides where the margin for error for tumbling down the mountainside is inches. Nothing like that could exist in the USA. The USA has gradually learned safety (often with the automobile companies fighting the entire way, such as with seatbelts), and in the world I envision, when abundance comes to pass, the first principles will be safety and harmlessness, not profits and speed. Those kinds of tradeoffs make no sense at all in a world based on abundance. Again, the zero-sum game goes away. There is no more "me or you." That becomes as obsolete as slavery.

And the average person cannot even begin to imagine any of it, or fear overwhelms them if they glimpse it, just like those australopiths and the campfire (level 5 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5 ). But if they can see a campfire and warm themselves around it, enjoy the benefit of sleeping on the ground, having cooked food, having light at night – then they will understand the benefits of fire. This transition to FE is fundamentally no different, and it will be up to 0.001% of humanity to get the ball rolling, similar to how it is likely that just one australopith got his/her band to learn to control fire. It only happened once, and then everybody learned it. Domesticating plants and animals was similar, in that for each one, only one or a few people did it, and the very first domestication made the subsequent ones easier, as people then understood the concept.

So, will I find even one of those at Avalon? Maybe not, but it seems like there are some. I know there are people here who are trying and want to see it. If I could find 1,000 like Ilie, FE would be a downhill racer.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 14:04
Humanity’s Second Epochal Event: The Super-Predator Revolution
Chapter summary:
• Humanity's progress up to the founder group that left Africa
• Thin fossil evidence for early human travels and development
• The global success of the elephant family
• The wild card of human consciousness
• The basics of human existence
• How right Darwin was
• Universal human traits
• Human mastery of language
• Evolutionary impacts on language and brain development
• The Great Leap Forward to behavioral modernity, and Missing Links
• The founder group's exit from Africa
• The energy return on hunting large animals
• The tendency of hunters to overkill
• The first megafauna mass extinction, in Australia
• The opposition to human agency in megafauna extinctions
• The myth of the peaceful savage
• The beginnings of warfare
• The beginnings of religion
• The universal human tendency to punish cheaters
• The unprecedented threat that humans posed to megafauna
• The human migration pattern from Africa, as established by DNA testing
• The short-lived Golden Age of the Hunter Gatherer
• Why the African and some Asian megafauna survived, and human DNA mixing with other humans
• Humans invade Europe, and Neanderthals quickly go extinct
• A new stone tool culture is developed from Neanderthal tools
• Climate change and Neanderthals
• The "hobbits" are the last surviving non-sapiens humans
• Humans and the mammoth extinctions
• The first fishermen
• The increase in human-on-human violence
• The debates on Western Hemisphere megafauna extinctions
• The native American migration from Asia
• The Western Hemisphere's megafauna extinctions
• Humans making the world safe for themselves
• Megafauna survival on island refuges
• Human migration after the ice sheets melted, as determined by DNA testing
• The great increase in human violence once the megafauna were gone
• The energy superiority of farming over hunting and gathering
• The high death rates of "primitive" warfare
• The economic basis of all warfare
• The dramatic effects of the melting ice sheets
• Why social animals are social, and hunter-gatherer social organization
• The resource-competition basis for warfare
• Societal male dominance and societal violence
• The peaceful beginnings of agricultural societies
• The fifth (microlith) stone technology culture appears
• The limbic conditioning of religion and warfare
• How unimaginable the result of the founder group's journey would have been to the founders
• The dog is the first domesticated animal

Limor Wolf
4th June 2014, 15:00
Hi Wade,

Thank you. There seems to be two swimming pools, a largest one for adults and one for children, and you chose to jump right to the deep waters : ) But most of us here who are reading your work are only learning to swim..

There must be an intermediate stage of implementation of FE which may very well transform very fast into a full galactic society of some sort, but even with those galactic societies there are one or more suns (100% backed up by science :)) and they probably have a role that is connected to energy somehow, the sun seems to be such an important element in the creation of life, at least on the realm that we are in, therefore giving up on the sun as a condition to growing our food may resemble a GMO in some way, it may be edible but not with the full energetic nutrition that we need. I may be wrong here, though, and it's just an inner feeling.

With regards to the fear of free energy, it may be that anyone who fears free energy may fear themselves, it is this lack of trust of one in self that can make someone turn their heads when such a profound solution is at hand, in the condition that they really do understand the related consequences of both ends of the rope. It sure looks as if we are no more on the possibility of a CPR and are nearing an impossible need in resurrection to this planet :( what other option do we have which allows us not only to reverse the situation but to grow into a 'renaissance' like time on a scale that never has been seen before?

Maybe, What's need to be in abundance is the world out there, but not so much our desires. If we are responsible enough as a species to take only what we need, play with energy in a creative way, by all means, but learn that there are risks as well, if and when we aim for the best, most loving, all including result, then we will be given the chance to create a world such as this.

An evolved consciousness always seems like a necessary component and it may be gained with the breaking of our society's system, programms and conditioning, this will allow consciousness to take place and for FE to be implemented ~

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 15:41
Hi Limor:

My essay leads astute readers into the baby end of the pool, first, and then gradually goes deeper. The very purpose of my essay is for people doing the work to get beyond baby steps, so they can see the big picture, because only with big picture awareness will any FE effort get past all of the many barriers, and the biggest barriers are in people's minds.

Ever seen a greenhouse? Even seen one that was indoors? In the USA, for many years, dynamite pot has been grown indoors that never saw the light of day. I am not too into the so-called mystical ideas that it has to be sunlight for plants to like it. As I make clear in my essay, there is nothing natural about a farm at all. People think that what they are familiar with is natural. That is not the case at all, and even being "natural" does not mean it is desirable. When male gorillas and chimps invade another band and kill off the males, they kill all the infants to make the females come into season and mate with the killers, and the females do. That is "natural." How about humans adopt that "natural" practice? :)

There are many delusions about "natural" in today's world. I am into harmlessness and abundance. Natural comes into the picture, but I vote for harmless and abundant over natural. Similarly, people extol natural fibers. There is nothing "natural" about wearing fibers. Do you see any other animals wearing fibers, or controlling fire? I plan to get my pupils beyond those thoughtless notions of "natural" and the like. That world that Roads visited had a creative harmony with nature that is truly mind-boggling, and they did it with love. In a world where scarcity and fear dominate, that loving world is unimaginable.

I do not advocate that people instantly become space people, and I just wrote what could be immediately eliminated with FE, and none of that entails "far out" thinking, but deciding that FE means that we can now strip-mine the planet with abandon, or chop down all the remaining forests to make way for agriculture, are just the kinds of stupid ideas that have environmentalists alarmed. But they project their scarcity-based awareness onto a situation of abundance, and all they see is destruction. I have a little more faith in humanity's sentience, and that when they can see and benefit from FE, my visions will no longer seem so "out there." The transition is worth thinking about, and my visions clearly show that I have, and the choir will have to get way beyond kindergarten into something like a high school awareness for my approach to work. That is why anybody aspiring to be in the choir has a lot of deep work ahead of them. Not because I have some kind of elite idea of what a choir is supposed to look like, but because the kindergarten approach (Level 10 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10 ) does not work. I have been involved with and witnessed enough kindergarten approaches for a lifetime, and they will not work for this, and I am doing something different.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 16:04
Humanity’s Third Epochal Event: The Domestication Revolution

Chapter summary:
• Seasonal variation beyond rainforest homes of humanity's ancestors
• The first permanent human settlements
• The Natufian culture
• Humanity's four pristine civilizations
• The connection between agriculture and civilization
• Earth's carrying capacity and the human population before the Domestication Revolution
• Group selection and human societies
• Çatal Höyük
• Climate change and the beginnings of agriculture
• Developing class systems, and difference in the diet of the sexes
• Animal domestication
• Plundering Earth's forests begins
• The plow and smelted metal
• The quick environmental demise of early civilizations
• The energetic benefits of water travel
• The "tyranny of distance" and civilization
• The world's first city
• The invention of the sailboat
• The Bronze Age
• The wheel
• Mass warfare begins, and its brutality
• The repression of original religions in cities
• The divine status of elites
• The appearance of the palace
• The legitimacy of pristine states
• Religious indoctrination and justification of elites and states
• Using abstract symbology to manipulate the mass mind
• The invention of writing
• The Epic of Gilgamesh
• Salination and siltation wreck Sumer
• Akkadian conquest of Sumer, resurgence of Ur, and barbaric laws
• The floods and droughts of deforested Mesopotamia
• Modern debates over societal collapse
• Cities and the obsolescence of clan organization
• Domestication around the world
• This essay's departures from orthodoxy
• The reasons for civilization, and the thin agricultural surplus of early civilization
• Early civilizations' effect on atmosphere
• The basics of civilization
• The scarcity assumption beneath all ideologies
• Early conservation efforts
• Mesopotamia's environmental refugees, including Abraham, and the hazards of taking the myths of religion literally
• The Old Testament's purpose
• The reliable food supply of the Nile River Valley
• The extinction of the Nile's megafauna
• A pharaoh's "job" of controlling the Nile's flood
• Egypt's Old Kingdom and building the necropolis at Giza
• The extinction of the Mediterranean megafauna
• Mesopotamia's scarcity of wood, and settling the Eastern Mediterranean
• The rise and fall of the Minoan civilization of Crete
• The rise and fall of civilization on Cyprus
• The Iron Age
• The rise of Mycenaean civilization
• Troy and the Trojan War
• The collapse of Bronze Age civilizations of Eastern Mediterranean
• The peak of Phoenician civilization
• The rise of Greek civilization after centuries of forest recovery
• Athens enters its classic period
• Greek wars with Persia
• Athenian war with Sparta begins
• The desertification of Athenian hinterland
• Athens's Sicilian expedition
• Greeks discover conservation, but too late
• Greek classic period ends, and Alexander the Great conquers most known civilizations
• Rome founded
• The thick forests near early Rome
• The Roman Republic founded
• Rome expands and conquers Carthage and Corinth
• Rome controls entire Mediterranean
• Roman civil wars begin
• The Roman Republic ends and the Roman Empire begins
• Rome's brutality toward people, animals, and hinterland
• Roman astonishment that Italy was once heavily forested
• Romans discover conservation, but too late
• Rome's rape-and-plunder economy
• Today's arid moonscapes of the Mediterranean periphery, where lush forests once stood
• Rome invades the British Isles and establishes short-lived iron industry
• Cyprus is again deforested to provide Roman bronze
• Rome's bath fleet scours Mediterranean periphery for wood
• The importance of the Roman Emperor's wheat fleet
• The unsustainability of all early civilizations
• Manipulating economic yardsticks
• Two centuries of Roman "peace" ends as Rome begins running out of energy
• Rome debases its currency
• Energy as the meaningful measure of macroeconomic health
• The declining EROI of declining civilizations
• Rome's decline and fall
• Civilization's unsustainable energy practices, not climate, was always primarily responsible for their demise
• China's developmental trajectory
• The invasions of pastoral societies into agricultural societies
• Human genetic adaptations to northern climates – blond hair, white skin, blue eyes
• The decline of women's status in civilization
• European invasions and the rise of violence
• The Bantu expansion
• Mesoamerica's developmental trajectory
• The relative environmental gentleness of the Western Hemisphere's Stone Age cultures
• The escalation of indigenous violence with European weapons
• The unsustainability of deforestation and agriculture
• The inability of hunter-gatherer peoples to imagine civilization

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 16:36
Epochal Event 3.5 – The Rise of Europe
Chapter summary:
• Emperor Constantine tries gambit to hold Roman Empire together
• Rome falls, invasions of Roman lands by Germanic tribes, the rise of Islam, and Moorish invasion of Iberia Peninsula
• Dark Ages followed by Medieval Warm Period and Viking invasions begin
• High Middle Ages begin in Europe
• "Pagan" technologies such as horse collar and watermill used in Europe
• Explosion in watermill use, and windmills introduced in Europe
• Reintroduction of Greek teachings to Christian Europe
• The Catholic Church's struggles with secular rulers, and the Crusades
• The Mongol invasions and the near destruction of Islam
• The Medieval Warm Period ends, and the catastrophic 1300s begin
• The Renaissance begins in northern Italy
• The Turks conquer Constantinople
• Portugal learns to sail the Atlantic Ocean
• Portugal initiates a new era of slavery
• Portugal and Spain's pursuit of slaves and gold in the 1500s
• Europe turns global ocean into low-energy transportation lane and begins conquering the world
• The English and Dutch rise to imperial dominance, and France dominates Continental Europe
• England's path to industrialization
• The deforested English countryside
• Coal pollution in England
• England resumes iron industry where Rome did, and the area is again quickly deforested
• A pirate becomes England's richest private citizen, and England conquers Scotland
• Deforested England invades and conquers Ireland, and establishes Ulster Plantation
• English invasion of North American begins
• Dispossessed English peasants become coal miners and live in new coal towns
• The importance of mast wood for ocean-going ships
• The struggle over European mast wood
• The English invasion of New England for mast wood
• The dispossession of English peasants with Game and Enclosure laws create the workforce for the Industrial Revolution

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 17:26
Humanity’s Fourth Epochal Event: The Industrial Revolution
Chapter summary:
• The relationship of England's deforestation and coal use
• The use of coal for smelting metal, and the explosion in English iron production
• The first commercial steam engine
• The life of English peasants in 1500, and how unimaginable 2014 London would be to them
• How cognitive and social changes are predicated on the economic situation
• Europe's fitful rise of science
• Elite control of society, and the rise of the classical economist
• The economic uselessness of gold rushes
• The rise of mercantilism
• Classical economists, their notions of wealth, and their service to the elite
• The British "free trade" invasion of China in its Opium Wars
• Karl Marx names capitalism, and for the first time provided an honest explanation of capital accumulation
• Retail politics and political systems competition
• Voltaire and the Enlightenment
• Isaac Newton and the slave trade
• The contrast of industrial and preindustrial economies
• The energetic basis of the World Wars
• Slavery ends with industrialization
• The rise of the corporation
• The benefits of England's invasion of North America
• The English invention of spinning machines
• The victory of the capitalist press over the working-class press
• The hellish conditions of early industrial England
• The genocidal English invasions of Virginia and New England
• The rise of racism with Europe's conquest of the world
• The English/American deforestation and resultant extinctions of North America
• The English deportation of "criminals," and invasion of Australia and Tasmania
• The UK's global imperial conquests and subjugations
• British rule leading to famines
• Overcoming malaria and scurvy in global conquest
• Fake imperial "philanthropy"
• Fake robber baron "philanthropy" and the rise of public relations
• The world's poor ship food to the world's rich
• Insider revelations of the real game being played by the West
• The purpose of imperialism
• Imperial indoctrination, public relations, and "education" making FE unimaginable
• The damage that the UK and USA have inflicted on humanity and the world
• The rise of American whaling
• The USA's quick industrial rise
• Coal power overtakes water power in the USA
• The deforestation and environmental devastation of New England and its conversion to coal
• The American competition between canals and railroads
• The richness of the North American continent, and how the USA quickly became the leading industrial nation
• The dramatic changes in making a living in the industrialized world
• The false self-image of American pioneers
• The USA's anachronistic embracement of slavery
• The rise of science and its relationship to imperialist and capitalist interests
• America's Founding Fathers and the fairy tales of American nationalism
• The mixed results of investigating life processes
• The mixed results of using fossil fuels
• The role of carbon dioxide in the current ice age and the current global warming
• The world's first industrial wars

Limor Wolf
4th June 2014, 17:41
Originally posted by Wade Frazier: "Ever seen a greenhouse? Even seen one that was indoors? In the USA, for many years, dynamite pot has been grown indoors that never saw the light of day. I am not too into the so-called mystical ideas that it has to be sunlight for plants to like it. As I make clear in my essay, there is nothing natural about a farm at all. People think that what they are familiar with is natural. That is not the case at all, and even being "natural" does not mean it is desirable. When male gorillas and chimps invade another band and kill off the males, they kill all the infants to make the females come into season and mate with the killers, and the females do. That is "natural." How about humans adopt that "natural" practice?

There are many delusions about "natural" in today's world. I am into harmlessness and abundance. Natural comes into the picture, but I vote for harmless and abundant over natural. Similarly, people extol natural fibers. There is nothing "natural" about wearing fibers. Do you see any other animals wearing fibers, or controlling fire? I plan to get my pupils beyond those thoughtless notions of "natural" and the like. That world that Roads visited had a creative harmony with nature that is truly mind-boggling, and they did it with love. In a world where scarcity and fear dominate, that loving world is unimaginable

Hi Wade,

However each one may view 'natural' :) (I personally do not think it exists) one thought comes to mind - It is the adjustment of men to nature that has to take place, and not the control of nature by men. The later will only be a route that will bring humanity back to the same destination, free energy, or not

Blessings ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 18:07
Epochal Event 4.5 – The Rise of Oil and Electricity

Chapter summary:
• American whaling peaks
• The first commercial oil well is drilled
• American plutocracy and political assassinations
• The Gilded Age, the rise of the Robber Barons, and John D. Rockefeller
• The encounters of FE and related activists with Rockefeller interests
• The relative unimportance of American presidents
• Ultra-elite power games I have known
• The global elite and psychopaths in their employ
• Conspiracism and hacking at branches
• Organized suppression of alternative and free energy
• Robber baron influence in fluoridation
• Nuclear industry influence in fluoridation
• The influence of J.P. Morgan
• The first uses of electricity
• Tesla, Edison, and Morgan
• The first "free energy" threat to the robber barons
• The modern uses of electricity
• The interacting dynamics of industrialization
• Human "morality" and imperial competitions
• La Belle Époque and the starvation of imperial subjects
• The rise of oil in transportation
• The West's dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire and its oil politics and genocides ever since
• Rockefeller control of economics and how neoclassical economics ignores energy
• Fear and greed become cornerstones of modern economic theory
• Modern economics is not a science
• The disdain that scientists hold for economists
• Professional racketeering the elite benefit derived from it
• Robber baron control of the medical establishment
• The crescendo of American nationalism and Japanese attempts to catch up to the West
• The economic motivation behind the World Wars
• The UK's rape of India
• German scientific advances
• Jewish intellectual achievement
• American industrialist support for Hitler
• The childishness of imperial ideology and those adhering to it
• Hitler learned his racist ideology Henry Ford
• The Industrial Revolution's reliance on fossil fuel energy
• The West rides on the backs of a trillion energy slaves
• The true economic benefit of oil
• Imagining the role of energy in our world
• Energy efficiency and societies
• The Industrial Revolution's dramatic rise in energy consumption
• Capitalism's formation of the ownership class
• Capitalism's speculative frenzies
• Hitler's mistakes
• The USA founding its CIA with death camp Nazis
• The first application of nuclear energy


¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi Limor:

Leave nature be has always been my motto and the star I steer by. :)

With FE, the entire concept of having to exploit nature for human benefit becomes obsolete, just like slavery became obsolete.

Wade

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 19:35
Taking a chapter summary break before chores.

In 1700, slavery was not challenged as an institution, anywhere on Earth. So-called "humanitarians" of the day argued for treating the slaves better. It was not until about 1750s, when machines began replacing people, that the abolition movements began. Slaves suddenly became uneconomical, and people began to develop consciences.

Hell, 2,000 years ago, nobody thought there was anything wrong with people being forced to murder each other for entertainment. There are no Golden Ages of the human past, especially when their lives were abundant, sustainable, and comfortable. It has never happened. Even today, industrialized civilization is burning up its primary energy resource a million times as fast as it was created, which is a little short of sustainable.

After the immense crime of killing off most of the world's large animals, to fuel the human conquest of Earth, people "settled" in for the hunter-gatherer phase of existence that paleo-advocates rhapsodize over. It is the most violent phase in the human journey, with about 25% of all men dying violently. On New Guinea, especially the highlands, we got a glimpse of how "pristine" humanity lived before urban civilization. It was that village life that so many feminists and others rhapsodize over, but you would not want to live there. It was sustainable after a fashion, and they were actually agricultural peoples, with crops and some domestic animals, like pigs. You risked your life to walk into the territory of a neighboring village. In some villages, the hunter-gatherers who were pushed to the mountainous hinterland raided the villages for food, as in villagers, as in cannibalism. And these were relict humans from the original African migration, so we were probably looking pretty far into the human past.

Their societies were "sustainable," in that about once a generation, as they bred to the land's carrying capacity, they would have a war that killed off a big part of the population (take-no-prisoners was normal), to bring the population back down to the carrying capacity, and life was "good" until the next war, in about a generation. Some fun.

Similarly, there are people who fantasize about medieval village life, and what good times those must have been. If you liked going years without bathing, having a 50% chance of living to adulthood, and living a life of brutal drudgery, if the plague did not come by to sweep you off, and you survived the fairly regular famines, or war did not sweep through your village, and you were not a witch who got burned alive, then life I guess was good, but that was really only reserved for the local potentate, who got to sleep with every woman on the night before her marriage, and other perks.

People can look to today's industrial world, and rightfully say that it is the best that humanity ever lived, and they would be right, but the USA hit peak oil in 1970, and our standard of living has declined since then, and the world hit peak oil in 2006, and the decline is coming for us all, unless some "miracle" like a war, global famine, or designer disease takes the useless eater population back down to a half billion or so. That is one of Godzilla's contingency plans.

When I find my views challenged, it is always by people who only have vague ideas about what I am referring to, and their responses show that they are firmly mired in the scarcity paradigm, and they look wistfully to some Golden Age that never was, or argue for treating the slaves a little better, not freeing them. My message is something else entirely.

Off to chores, and maybe to some hiking.

Best,

Wade

Billy
4th June 2014, 20:45
I thought i would share this with you Wade. It gave me a huge smile. ;)

iIOZ_aMrKos

Doug Coulter used to build signal processing and radio gadgets for our favorite three-lettered intelligence agencies, but for the past decade or so, Doug's chosen to explore his engineering interests in the isolated backwoods of Virginia, absent from any pesky boss or sticky bureaucracy.


After tiring of living with a meth head who had a trigger finger itchier than an Appalachian mosquito bite, Doug gave his ex-housemate the boot and confiscated his weapons, thus paving the way for his new found love for gunsmithing. Doug has since open sourced his gun and ammo making techniques on his well-trafficked engineering forum.

But Doug's most exciting creation is his guerilla-engineered nuclear fusion reactor. Doug's pursuit for a limitless source of clean and self-sufficient energy takes place in what he calls his "den of creative chaos," which is essentially a cluttered workshop in the entrance of his home, directly underneath his bedroom.

Read more: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-...


http://thespiritscience.net/2014/06/03/this-reclusive-chain-smoking-gun-lover-built-a-fusion-reactor-in-his-basement/

What you’re about to see is what happens when someone with a lot of love, brilliance and technological know-how can’t stand how frustrating the world can be sometimes, and decides to create something on his own. The results are nothing short of fantastic.

He chain smokes, he loves his guns, and he almost looks homeless, and yet this man is actually pretty damn awesome. Meet Doug Coulter. A guy who spends his time doing everything from being a gunsmith to a DIY engineer. His ability is so amazing that he’s built a nuclear fusion reactor in his basement. Yup.


http://www.coultersmithing.com/forums/index.php




There is hope out there.

peace

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 22:08
About to go hiking.
Thanks Billy. That is a little more cluttered than the typical tinkerer's workshop. :)
Good luck to him is all I can say. If he really gets something going, he will get a different kind of visit, and his guns won't help him.


The Postwar Boom, Peak Oil, and the Decline of Industrial Civilization
Chapter summary:
• The demographic catastrophes that Europe inflicted on humanity
• The Industrial Revolution's demographic transition
• The advantages of cities
• The workforce of preindustrial civilization
• The disadvantages of cities
• Robber baron fake philanthropy goes global
• Structural analysis
• The birth of the USA's security state
• The postwar boom
• John Kennedy, Cuba, the Soviet Union, and Kennedy's assassination
• Energy concepts for understanding economies
• Peak Oil
• Energy Return on Investment (EROI)

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 23:08
My Adventures and Those of My Fellow Travelers

Chapter summary:
• Dennis Lee's, Brian O'Leary's, and my journeys
• Dennis's ingenious methods
• Offers to make us disappear, before they begin playing rough
• A friend receives an exotic technology show
• Our initial ignorance of the free energy field and its history
• Brian's work on asteroid mining and space colonies
• Brian's life-shortening investigations of UFOs
• Brian plays the Paul Revere of free energy
• Are humans a sentient species?
• Our experiences were far from unique
• The many libels directed at Dennis
• What attracted me to Dennis and Brian
• My changing views
• The easy life of a Global Controller, as everybody helps out
• Dennis's many approaches
• Hazards for the ego
• My influences
• Direct personal experience, and scientific investigation of the paranormal
• The UFO/ET issue
• Antigravity, free energy, and ETs
• Thousands of failed attempts to bring free energy to the public
• Hints of the future

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 23:21
Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy
Chapter summary:
• Ideal free energy device
• Immediate material changes with appearance of free energy
• Cognitive and social changes
• Longer-term changes
• Obsolescence of elites
• End of capitalist distortion of science and medicine
• Changes in family structure
• Human changes to evolution
• Fear is the enemy, and can only be defeated by love
• Golden Ages of the past
• Relationship of ET presence and free energy and antigravity suppression
• Necessity of energy abundance for any abundance ideas to work
• Visions of the future

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 23:33
The Sixth Mass Extinction or the Fifth Epochal Event?

Chapter summary:
• What is nature?
• What is human nature, can we change it, and does it matter?
• Sixth mass extinction is underway
• Environmental devastation of humanity's energy production methods
• Will we have World War III?
• Without free energy, few, if any, of previous chapter's visions are feasible
• The Global Controllers' greatest triumph
• Our choice according to Bucky Fuller
• Will we choose the Sixth Mass Extinction of the Fifth Epochal Event?

Wade Frazier
4th June 2014, 23:51
Boy, that was a little work. Now, to add some pictures…


What Has Not Worked So Far and What Might

Chapter summary:
• Problems that free energy efforts encounter
• Levels of free energy awareness
• Approaches to bringing free energy to the world that have failed and are unlikely to succeed
• Unsuitability of today's free energy field
• Possibly divine nature of the zero-point field
• Forming my Epochal Event paradigm
• Global Controllers cannot be the focus, but effort must rely on combined positive intention
• Why I am taking this approach, and those whom I seek
• What I plan to ask of those I seek
• What I hope to accomplish and the numbers needed
• Unsuitability of this approach for social circles
• The trap of judgment
• We are on the brink, and the masses will not awaken with talk, but by experience
• Do we choose Utopia or oblivion?

Wade Frazier
6th June 2014, 12:13
Hi:

I am editing the big essay and older ones on my site, and thinking a lot about what I am trying to accomplish. The end goal I think is obvious, but the strategic goals of the essay and choir work may not seem so obvious at first.

The goals of my essay are:


1. Help non-scientists achieve some scientific literacy;

2. Help all readers understand the role of energy, not only in the human journey, but for the entire history of Earth;

3. Help readers understand the epochal importance of tapping a new energy source. All of humanity's biggest events were about achieving the technical prowess and social organization to tap a new energy source, and the human journey was then transformed in ways that were unimaginable to those living before the new energy source was tapped;

4. Help readers understand energy's role in today's industrial economy, and what is happening right now, as the world begins to runs out of oil (Peak Oil was reached in 2006, and the presentation linked to below argues that it was reached in 2005);

5. Help readers understand the geopolitical role of energy, oil in particular;

6. Help readers understand how environmentally destructive humanity's energy practices have always been; humans have not lived in harmony with nature since the control of fire;

7. Establish the credentials of people like Dennis, Brian, me, and my few fellow travelers; if there is anybody who knows how the land lies for the acceptance of disruptive energy technologies and what has been suppressed, we are the people from the public (not "insiders" - and insiders are often compromised, and I generally do not trust what they have to say, unless it is well-documented) who would likely know best; and we know that FE technology already exists on Earth, but is sequestered; we are generally not conspiracists, but just people who tried to make a dent and discovered the hard way how the world really works;

8. Help readers understand why all previous FE attempts launched in the public sphere have failed;

9. Help readers understand what a tiny fraction of humanity is capable of if it can shed its scarcity-based orientation and simply imagine abundance;

10. Show the path to a technical FE project that may stand a chance.


So, that is all that I am trying to accomplish. That might seem easy (or not :) ), but it is highly difficult, and nobody has ever tried it before, to my knowledge. My essay is laying out a curriculum, but it will really be up to each reader to do the work. Almost nobody on Earth is suited for it, as they cannot let go of their scarcity-based conditioning, where they traded their sentience for security. I doubt that high intelligence is really that important. Everybody I respect in the FE field had their heart in the right place, first. That is the most important quality, not being "smart."

I am looking for people who are less than one-in-a-thousand in the general population, and to really be able to do the work, they usually had to experience some kind of awakening, where they understood the false foundation of their conditioning in an important area of their lives. Once they can see through one of them, the others are easier to see through, and anybody in the choir has to be able to see through all of them before they are finished, as being captured by any one of them means that they are still trapped.

The "smart" usually see past the basic scarcity-based indoctrination of organized religions, nationalism, and capitalism, but they get trapped by the assumptions of the rationalist-materialist paradigm that guides mainstream ("White") science. Those in Black Science do not have those limitations. For that reason, I really do not seek many from the scientific world. They are often the most stuck of all.

But getting unstuck from those traps does not mean total freedom, as the fringes are filled with pitfalls, with New Age gurus selling their wares, inventors of the hour thinking they are the messiah, fringe theorists way overplaying their hands, on both the supporting evidence (and denying the falsifying evidence) and the significance of the focus of their predilections, and the like. It is a minefield, and I have spent many years navigating it. Most pitfalls around FE attempts are about people's inexperience, naïveté, greed, gullibility, and the like. An FE effort rooted in a mature and worldly perspective of the issue has never been mounted before, and that is what I am attempting to initiate. It will take hard work, very hard work, for people to get there, but it is very likely that nothing less will work.

The concept of Energy Return On Investment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EROEI

is prominent in my essay, and the work of an author of the idea is also behind this presentation:

http://www.feasta.org/2014/06/03/peak-oil-revisited/

People have to understand, in many ways, how the world really works, and that is where scientific literacy and political-economic worldliness come into the picture. If people do not have that, then they will be easily led astray. As I have stated, I do not need followers, but sovereign, fully sentient people who can think for themselves and who are highly discerning. Those are critical aspects of making this idea come to fruition. The essay was designed so that I am kind of superfluous to the process. People with the right stuff can do the work and raise their awareness, with little more input from me necessary, although I am going to be there to help, but before long, I will be concentrating my efforts on initiates who are doing the work, and will no longer have the time or interest for newcomers who are not doing the work and are looking for easy answers. I have none to give them.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
6th June 2014, 12:50
As I have worked on the essay, some Avalonians have alerted me to new scientific papers germane to my essay, and I just added this note to my "super predator" chapter, for which I put up a draft of here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=799633&viewfull=1#post799633

The note looks like this:

A few months after this chapter was first drafted, a new paper confirmed my views. The authors cited some of the very same papers that I thought were seriously flawed, which concluded that climate change killed off the Australian and South American megafauna, for instance. See Christopher Sandom, et al.'s "Global late Quaternary megafauna extinctions linked to humans, not climate change", Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, July 2014, volume 281, number 1787, 20133254. The paper was first published on June 4, 2014.

The paper is here:

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1787/20133254.full

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140604094108.htm

For years, I was influenced by anthropology's "peaceful savage" myth, which was largely born of some "Golden Age" wistfulness that anthropologists adopted in the wake of the world wars. I was also influenced by the ecological native themes among anthropologists and activists, and I also had been peeking into catastrophic theory. All these years later, I came to understand that the peaceful savage myth was just that, a myth. Preliterate societies are far more violent, proportionally, than civilized ones.

Stone Age peoples did not have the ability to ravage the environments to the extent that Bronze Age and Iron Age peoples did, so their tenures were gentler, but it was not because they had some kind of mystical wisdom in relating to the environment and each other, although Stone Age peoples could live in something close to sustainable, at least after they killed off all the easy meat, which brings me back to that new paper.

Anthropologists have discovered that hunters have never had some kind of self-restraint when it came to hunting. They killed as much as they could, with no regard to a sustainable future, and when that founder group left Africa about 60,000 years ago, they easily drove most of Earth's large animals to extinction.

IMO, puncturing those myths and getting at the truth are far from meaningless academic exercises: they actually had a lot do with the vision that my essay imparts, and a better understanding of a path to FE that might have a chance.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
7th June 2014, 13:09
Hi:

As I have been writing the essay, I have been getting plenty of "What the heck do you think you are doing?" responses from those around me, and plenty of slings and arrows came my way. But I had to stay true to the vision that I began my essay with, and it took several months longer than I anticipated, but I am now getting feedback that is letting me know it was worth it. I have written about how when I wrote to people such as Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and Ed Herman:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/zinn.htm

their graciousness and prompt responses fully confirmed the impression I got from their work about what genuine, caring people they were. Yesterday, I heard from one of the world's leading paleobiologists, who surprisingly spent the day reading my essay, and he wrote:

"One of the best summaries of history of earth life I have ever seen."

It is good to know that I did not screw that part up, but when I got that reaction from him, I began rereading those sections, looking for mistakes. There are plenty, being that it is a one-man show for now, so I plan to really comb those sections again, as well as the whole essay. I want to put out the best effort that I can. I will likely not write anything like it again. I have other scientist pals banging on the essay, so I hope to get it all as accurate as I can before I publish it.

Although it may not seem like it to casual readers, the journey of life on Earth and human journey parts of my essay are highly germane to my intent for the essay. They are necessary for developing a comprehensive view of the journey of life and humanity, from which a mature view of the FE situation can arise. I am getting some reviewers cutting to the chase and the last few chapters, wanting to know about FE and what I plan to do about it, but the 300-page "prelude" to it is very important, IMO.

As the story gets closer to where humans enter the scene, it likely gets more interesting to most readers, and there are many key understandings that come from that study. The megafauna and other human extinctions, along with anthropologist work on indigenous people, along with work on warfare, religion, ape studies, and the like, have painted, for me, a highly impressive picture of human “nature” and the human journey.

That material is highly relevant to my work, in several ways. The human past is bloody, without much that anybody would call wise or redeeming, but it has gotten better with the rise in standard of living that tapping new energy sources made possible. I will not belabor that point, as I think the essay makes it clear, but I write about those subjects in my essay to not just form a paradigm for the readers, but it is also a journey of my own understanding. By the time I began writing the essay, my paradigm was pretty well set, but I expected to learn more and get “aha” moments in studying for the essay. I got plenty of them, and the ones for the early human journey were particularly important to me and my work.

As an example of what the multidisciplinary aspect of my work helped me see, the Gravettians were hunting the hell out of mammoths (and any other Arctic megafauna, like rhinos) long before the ice sheets melted, and during the glacial maximum, they were already being hunted out. So, even the Arctic megafauna likely had a human explanation for their demise, especially when some survived on islands several thousand years after their mainland cousins went extinct. For some reason, the Arctic megafauna extinctions have been obsessively focused on by many camps. My impression is it is because so many mammoths were preserved (likely when ice dams broke and those mammoths were buried in the catastrophe), and the climate and vegetation changed the most dramatically near the ice sheets, but obsessively focusing on the Arctic extinctions is a good way to lose sight of the global nature of the extinctions.

When I began looking at the DNA testing of human populations, and the pattern of migration from Africa that has been established, and when archeologists think those migrations happened, the pattern coincided almost exactly with the megafauna extinctions. That pretty much sealed it for me. Also, with other early human DNA in the genome (Neanderthal, Denisovan, others), it seems pretty clear, that like the European conquests and “settlements,” behaviorally modern Homo sapiens interbred with those other human species as they drove them to extinction. The circumstantial evidence seems almost strong enough to stand up in court. For me, the issue is settled, although there will likely be bickering on that highly charged subject for a long time.

I have written about it plenty, and the essay goes pretty deeply on it, but with each epochal event, which always came about by humans tapping a new energy source, the human journey transformed in ways that were unimaginable to people living before the event. Also, societies became far more humane.

Before civilization, after the continents filled up with the descendants of that founder group that left Africa, after all the easy meat was rendered extinct and humans became intensely territorial once again, just as with chimpanzee bands, when one band defeated the other, the males were all killed, and even worse than the chimps, killing everybody was apparently practiced often enough, although women were usually the prime booty, along with the gained territory. Other times, just raiding for women was the plan. Take all the women, and the society cannot survive.

In the first places where agriculture began, women did a lot of the farming, before draft animals were used, and their economic contribution was roughly equivalent to a man's. During that relatively brief interval in the human journey, women's status was the highest ever, at least before industrialization, and those were the most peaceful settled early societies that anthropologists can find. But as they grew toward states, men began to dominate, and when draft animals became part of civilization, men had the physical strength for the job that women lacked, women's status declined, and societies began to become more violent.

By the time that early states formed, human societies were back to their brutal ways, and when the first city-states fought, in Sumer, huge slaughters in battle, with the losers being eradicated (any spared men were all enslaved, usually after being crippled (taking out eyes and chopping off a foot were common ways to do it, the woman and children taken as booty, if they were spared at all)) were standard operating procedure, and the bloody tales of the Old Testament, or the Code of Hammurabi, gave evidence of the brutality of early urban civilization. By the time of Rome, where people were forced to murder each other for entertainment, almost nobody questioned the nature of such festivities. And here, religion gets some credit, surprise of surprises. One of the first protests was a Christian priest who leapt into an arena to protest, but was torn apart by the enraged crowd.

But it was always rising standards of living that made life more humane, and people developed consciences as a result of their economic condition. When machines began to replace labor, with watermills in Europe being a critical step in that development, in the 1740s in England, when spinning machines made their appearance, soon thereafter the abolition movement began. An institution that was literally as old as civilization, and had never been challenged on fundamental grounds, soon vanished, and is seen as the height of barbarity today. If industrialization did not happen, fueled by that captured energy, the world would likely look no different than it did several hundred years ago.

Domestication did not happen everywhere, and as Europe began conquering the world, societies still in the hunter-gatherer phase, such as in Australia, gave us a glimpse into our past. The "pristine" state of those hunter-gatherers did not last long, as European greed, violence, and diseases wiped out almost all of those peoples, and quickly, but from what could be gathered by not only fledgling anthropologists of the day, but modern anthropologists, with extremely few exceptions, hunter-gatherers did not live gently. If a society was matrilineal, meaning that the men left the societies, to avoid inbreeding, those were the most peaceful preliterate societies. If the women left the society while the men stayed, those became, by far, those most violent societies, with gangs of men murdering each other, raping the women, and the like. I had encountered plenty of anthropological and feminist literature on that subject over the years, and came to realize that some of it had been over-idealized, but the basics appear to be on a solid foundation. When men run a society, it becomes exceedingly violent, but when women's status is higher, basically because their economic contribution is more equal, then society becomes gentler.

One of the big problems with FE is that men dominate the field, and inventor-itis, greed, Young Warrior delusions, messiah complexes, and the like dominate it. It is why I keep saying that women need to step up if FE is going to go anywhere. I would not say that my essay is aimed at women. It is aimed more at non-scientists, and since relatively few women are scientists, then I suppose that my work will target women more than men, but those are just the numbers. But the FE field is way too male-heavy, and it needs to be remedied, but by women with some scientific literacy, and comprehensive perspectives are desperately needed. As I have stated, I am not really looking to attract more people to the FE field as it exists today, as it is in a state of arrested development, and almost nobody in the field today has The Right Stuff, but I am trying to build something from scratch.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
7th June 2014, 19:55
Hi:

I just spent some time on Brian's bio:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_O%27Leary

If no "editors" start putting the moon landings ball in play, or begin playing games with his credentials and efforts, I can live with the bio as it stands, and have only one more set of citations to add, on those magazines that he wrote for. I have already found some of them, but most will take a bit of work, and I hope that I do not have to be exhaustive to support them. Carrying Brian's spears, even after he is gone, is an honor. The big essay is partly dedicated to his memory. Great, great man.

This coming week will likely be editing the big essay more, and editing my Dennis essays. I just got done re-editing this one.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm

They are not great editing jobs, but will have to be good enough for now.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
8th June 2014, 04:02
Hi:

Today, among my other duties, I took a walk in the woods next to our house with my wife, identifying the trees and plants for her, and then I hiked at my favorite local mountain, on a little three-mile hike in paradise. One pic attached is from that hike, and another is of my front yard today. Today was like a fairy tale. For the next four months, I live in about the most beautiful place on Earth. I have encountered many people who have traveled the globe, and here in summer takes the cake. I do not mind the rest of the year, either, but summers here are spectacular, even though May is my favorite month here.

A year ago, when I began the year off that I largely used to write the essay, I took a 9,000-mile road trip, and made 25 stops in 30 days, on a Bucket List trip. Two people died between me planning the trip and making it to their homes. It was a trip to see people, and I bypassed all the landmarks, like Niagara Falls and the Grand Canyon, but it was a beautiful trip, taken in the spring. But the most beautiful sight was pulling into my neighborhood at the end, and not because I was home-sweet-home, but because it was a day like today, and my street was a riot of blossoms, the sky was spectacular, etc.

There are baby bunnies in our yard. A couple of days ago, where we rent, the exterminator for our landlord was at our home, introduced himself, and we chatted. He specializes in rodents (mainly rats) and insects. All homes around here get woodpeckers in the spring, but nobody kills them, but they find ways to make peace with them, such as putting up birdhouses. I told the exterminator about how nice it was to have rabbits in our yard, and he said it was a bumper year for rabbits, but many people around here consider them pests. We have a regular deer on our street, and a herd comes through periodically, mothers and does, and I saw a buck last year. We get jays, robins, and all sorts of birds that I have not identified, and squirrels are a given. We have a Douglas fir, a cedar, and a redwood in our back yard, and a vast profusion of flowers. I am very grateful for my life.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
8th June 2014, 19:06
Hi:

I just got back from hiking with my wife, playing the plant and tree identification game. As I was loading the car, I turned around, and there was one of those baby bunnies, pic attached. Attached are a couple of pics from this morning's hike, doing the same three-mile loop that I did last evening. I could do that loop every day, but I could not see all there is to see around here if I hiked a new trail every day.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
8th June 2014, 19:11
Ah Wade, too bad I live rather far from our mountains (the Carpathians). I'd make some pictures to compete with yours ;)

With FE I could just simply show you... like right now! He he...

Good energies with the essay work (and the rest).

Wade Frazier
8th June 2014, 19:27
Hi Ilie:

That is a competition I would welcome. :) Then somebody from Nepal would start posting their pics and it would start to get out of hand, and then Buzz Aldrin and Ed Mitchell would join in with their "informal" pics from the moon, and I would reply with, "That looks kind of barren to me!" I would not want to live there!"

If you can top these ones, young man:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/pics.htm

I will gladly be trumped, and put the Carpathians on my list of places to visit once I have my personal FE/antigravity transport. :)

Best,

Wade

Nine
9th June 2014, 05:29
Hi:

I just spent some time on Brian's bio:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_O%27Leary

If no "editors" start putting the moon landings ball in play, or begin playing games with his credentials and efforts, I can live with the bio as it stands, and have only one more set of citations to add, on those magazines that he wrote for. I have already found some of them, but most will take a bit of work, and I hope that I do not have to be exhaustive to support them. Carrying Brian's spears, even after he is gone, is an honor. The big essay is partly dedicated to his memory. Great, great man.

This coming week will likely be editing the big essay more, and editing my Dennis essays. I just got done re-editing this one.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm

They are not great editing jobs, but will have to be good enough for now.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade




Wade,

I come and go upon your posts upon your site....but I simply love your work....

Why do I come and go? It is simply that your writing is so very difficult and the links you provide simply provide me with at times an information overload....as it were...

I simply need time to reflect upon what was presented as true or false and its always true....

However, no one person has the whole truth and of course I sang in a choir once and its not about blandly repeating the notes but recreating the intent of the creator of the work....

Wikipedia on Choir...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choir

I am a musician and the intent of the conductor and the choir is the interpretation of the music performed not that the conductor is a dictator....though some are.... that do not understand the principal that music is creative in its intent....

I do indeed sense that you are a very good person and not a dictator and of course when I put a like upon your words it means that I am trying to understand....

I understand little of your science but I do understand the science of Godzilla which is Government.....and its agents and how it corrupts and how nothing is as it seams.....

In the science of government one always asks where does power come from? In other words simply put....who is in charge.....

And so I am beginning to understand what you are saying dearest Wade....in that question of Government power and who is in charge will become obsolete with a proper energy source that can fuel our societies....

That first step is admitting that its possible and that those "in charge" are already using said technology and the world has not ended from that.....

Wade, I could tell you to listen to an information dump by an insider by the name of Duff.....but you of course are light years ahead of him in this game as are our global controllers.....

I understand little of the free energy game.....


Nine

Wade Frazier
9th June 2014, 14:01
Hi Nine:

As I see it, the big game has always been energy. Just this morning, a pal clued me in on Heinberg's latest message of doom:

http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-06-05/iea-says-the-party-s-over#

Heinberg has been beating that drum for a long time:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm

As Bucky Fuller said, politicians are only stooges of the economic interests:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#politics

and my experience confirms that, particularly as far as government goes. Every time the government came after Dennis or me, it was always at the behest of its private interest patrons.

On getting a choir going, I doubt that a choir can be led by a dictator, especially for the song I am trying to help people learn to sing. But I do have experience in the milieu, and it is highly dangerous, so keeping choir members out of harm's way is probably most important, and when I see naïve newbies rushing to go climb into the tiger's cage to either go pet it or wrestle it, I can act like a parent. I will attempt to only invite people into the choir who have grown up past that (or they deny that the tiger exists), but almost nobody has, which is a big part of the challenge.

This week, I am editing my Dennis essays, and for the first time in more than twenty years, am rewriting my Bill the BPA Hit Man essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

and it is heavy lifting, let me tell you.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
9th June 2014, 16:39
Reading the Heinberg's links, It is not clear whether it is possible to classify his approach as a more 'realistic' or as a more 'pessimistic' one, but the astonishment lays on the ability to so easily turn the head from FE potential under such circumstances as he himself diagnoses humanity to be in, suggesting that five millions people are redundant when the fossil fuels will no longer be able to sustain us, and even more. In such circumstances how is it possible to even afford to overlook FE under justifications that no doubt represent the half empty glass..
God only knows.

What viable suggestions such an approach has? to reduce and minimise ourselves until we are limited to a one segment of a floor, hang by a thread and simply delay the end?

It is more and more apparent from Wade's conclusions and observations, where he continuously points out, that scarcity paints and designs our world as nothing else does. Thinking in terms of abundance may be the other end of the rope and not an easy shift to make, but here is a case where the initial acknowledgment in the existance of FE has already been done, it is nothing but very real in nature as it's potential is quite evident, but instead of taking an important note to check that out ASAP, the brain is somehow switching back to the more familiar and known land, and there must be something in the phrase - "better the devil you know". This is quite strange, really.

-----------------
Good luck with the heavy lifting, Wade. If I may ask, by 'rewriting my Bill the BPA Hit Man essay', do you mean that you would like to polish it, add a few more details or proofread it?

Your pictures attached from the hikings and little tours around your house are very inspiring and beautiful, energy seems to flow just the right way when the sun is shining bright in and between the trees and the bunnies are out. With regards to Ilie's suggestion, I will say, let the competition begin, I think we viewers will all enjoy it tremendously :)

All the best,

Limor

Wade Frazier
9th June 2014, 19:48
Hi Limor:

That hit man "essay" is essentially a diary entry from about 1992. What will replace it will show how my writings have changed since then. I am about halfway through the rewrite, and some little scraps of the original essay will survive, but it won't be much. Writing about evil is no fun, and is why I avoided touching that "essay" for more than twenty years. Studying and writing about World War II and the Jewish Holocaust nearly ruined my marriage, and I am very leery about tackling that essay again, although it needs my attention:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm

Bill the BPA Hit Man is way up there on the evil scale, working on behalf of Godzilla.

But it is time to revise that "essay," before I take a bigger stage.

On Heinberg, Peak Oil, and FE, that is a big subject that I do not have much time for today, and I have written about it plenty at Avalon:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=636156&viewfull=1#post636156

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=634069&viewfull=1#post634069

In the end, I had to conclude that Heinberg was dishonest. I consider it very likely that his dishonesty is more of the unconscious kind, where the glaring contradictions in his positions have somehow been internally rationalized, so that he could feign interest in FE (in a semi-ridiculing way), but when the Real McCoy like me showed up, he ran the other way.

I approached him in a very friendly way, wanting to help enlighten him about the very subject he wrote about, and was eager to introduce him to Brian. Not only did he run away, since then he has denied any validity to FE, but I know for a fact that he has performed zero credible investigation into it.

But I can’t blame Heinberg too much; he is like 99.99% of the "smart." What was far more disconcerting was how Heinberg was feted like royalty by the "left" and "environmentalists," while Brian was totally shut out from the same venues, as they eagerly lapped up Heinberg's drumbeat of doom:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#austerity

That kind of stuff made Brian openly wonder if humanity is a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

After watching the Heinberg and similar circuses (many of them), I had to wonder the same thing myself. One thing is for sure: FE will not be helped by "progressive," "environmental," Peak Oil, and similar organizations. I went at it for many years, as did Brian, Dennis, and others, and there is nobody home in those organizations, and if they even acknowledge FE for an instant, they flee, shrieking. Their "solutions" are getting rid of more than six billion "excess" humans. Godzilla himself could not have arranged such a situation better if he had tried, where FE is treated like the enemy, and I know that he has little or nothing to do with that state of affairs; it is only people's addiction to scarcity. It was not until after encountering Bucky:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

and seeing the antics of people like Heinberg, that it finally became clear to me. It is mind-boggling to try to wrap one's head around where they are at, and I do not do it anymore. 99.99% of humanity is fast asleep, and they are not my target audience. Just yesterday, I was rereading Roads's book where this odyssey comes from:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

and he told his mentor that if he reported his experiences, that almost everybody would attack and ridicule him, and his mentor said that that was OK, and the few people who would benefit from his revelations were worth the effort, and they would do something worthwhile with them. I would like to think that I am one of those people. Thank you, Michael! :)

Back to writing about evil…

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
10th June 2014, 00:35
Hi:

I am roaring along. Lots to do and limited time. Here is my Bill the BPA Hit Man revision:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

and on to my last Dennis essay to revise:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm

I plan to knock that off this week. Readers can tell that I am adding some new documents:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/selectors.jpg

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/checks.jpg

I could spend several months re-editing and rewriting my big essays, like the medical racket, American Empire, war, and cover-up essays, but they will only get attention in the few places that have been on my list to revise for several years. They will have to be good enough for now, and will also become ancillary to my new essay. For the people whom I hope to attract to my work, the new essay is the big one, and the rest just complementary.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
10th June 2014, 04:02
Hi:

The revised essay on Bill the BPA Hit Man and revising the other Dennis essays is mainly for the benefit of those aspiring to be in the choir, but also for the general public, to sober up newcomers who have all sorts of misconceptions about how the world really works. It works almost nothing like Joe Average thinks it does, and if people pursue FE dragging along all of those delusions fed them from the popular culture, they will not get far, if they even survive the process.

My work, especially my choir work, will not be for dabblers. Already, I am getting people approaching my work from their agendas, and trying to get what I am going aligned with somebody else's efforts. I am not interested in any of that, because I have never seen another effort that I am interested in aligning with, not for making FE happen. Every one that I have seen or heard of was trying some shortcut, trying to drag along their delusions, trying for riches and fame, and so on.

I am doing something different, and plan to build the effort from scratch, and it will not happen overnight. The story of Bill the BPA Hit Man is not something from a bygone era. He is still working his magic, working for a Fortune 500 company today. His kind of sociopathic approach is common, and he easily dupes the naïve and unwary. In cyberspace, Mr. Skeptic is about the equivalent of Bill:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#friends

and I have watched him dupe people in the FE field with his affable skeptic charade, and when he starts lying out of both sides of his mouth, people cannot believe that somebody so affable and friendly can be such a lying sack. That is what psychopaths rely on, where their attempts to appear like a Boy Scout dupe the unwary. I have seen them in action plenty of times, and they are good at what they do, I will grant them that.

That is one reason why I try to not get too eloquent in my work, and I have greatly reduced the editorial observations in my work over the years, letting the information speak for itself, of keeping my observations relatively unadorned. I am also human with human goals, so I can't write like a robot, but I try to keep from being too affable, as I have seen how that can seduce people, and I really want people who come to understand my material by doing the work and going deep, not "believing" something because I said so. I want to be as far from that as I can. That is partly why I have been loading up my Dennis essays with documents lately, and why my upcoming essay, for instance, had thousands of external links, as well as more than 800 references. That is so that people can do the work to develop comprehensive perspectives, because people will not develop them unless they do the work.

Time for bed.

Best,

Wade

Robert J. Niewiadomski
10th June 2014, 08:46
Hi,

For any doubters in Bill BPA hit man story beeing a reality in this pity world of ours, here is a link to the movie "I Am Fishead" (1 hr 18 mins) by Czech filmmakers Misha Votruba and Vaclav Dejcmar:
http://vimeo.com/29036894
Password: fhmovie

The movie features several known figures (https://www.fisheadmovie.com/thinkers) sharing their experiences of encounters with psychopaths.

Don't worry i have autors' written permission to post the password and the link:

Robert,


Thank you for your interest in our movie I am <fishead(...If you want to watch the film and provide some feedback, go to www.FHmovie.com, click on Where To See and use the password: fhmovie

Please become a fan on facebook, if you have not done so already and don't forget to share the film with at least 5 people around you.

We rely on people like yourself to spread the message of the film. Feel free to share the link and the password with your friends and please encourage them to write to visit our site and write to us through facebook.

Try our psychopath detection tool for iphone and fb.

Your action is important!

Enjoy the movie and we look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

Misha Votruba&Vaclav Dejcmar

But they, darkpathers, are not the problem. We are. By insisting to stay in the comfort zone of our imaginary worlds we accept as real.

EDIT:
One last note. Two psychologists appearing in that movie, Paul Babiak and Robert D. Hare, have co-written book titled Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work (http://www.amazon.com/Snakes-Suits-When-Psychopaths-Work/dp/0061147893) describing modus operandi of psychopaths in the office setting. In course of their research they arrived at observation that, statistically, 1 person for any given group of 100 people may be affected by the condition. I don't know if their studies are limited to white Caucasians only. I hope other ethnic groups have ratios below 1%...

Wade Frazier
10th June 2014, 10:58
Thanks Robert:

Like studying warfare, studying psychopaths is not something that I enjoy, but for those who have a hard time understanding how psychopaths operate, I am sure that the movie is informative. In mystical terms, psychopaths are "merely" dark pathers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#serving

What is likely the most disconcerting is that corporations and Godzilla find psychopaths very useful. I have written it before, that psychopaths are kind of expensive, dangerous, and sparingly used. Far cheaper are chumps who actually believe in their missions, like Ralph McGehee did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm

or my relative who was a CIA contract agent:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#cia

Just like most people never figure out how the world works, preferring the fantasies of their indoctrination, those chumps rarely figure it out, either, as they blindly follow orders and believe the lies they are told, as they get their hands bloody.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
10th June 2014, 15:44
Hi:

As should be obvious, my work is vastly different than any other "whistleblower" I know of, especially from the fringe world. My work is scholarly, and while I rarely name names, I do when I can, such as now naming Ken Hodgell on my site:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm#texas

While Dennis even could be hesitant to name names (we do it to protect the innocent and the guilty), he often did, and anybody with a modicum of initiative could easily dig up names and documentation. Several years ago, when I still subjected myself to public forums and their endless trolls, some reader said that my story was not taken seriously because readers could not spend ten minutes surfing the Internet to confirm names and facts. That reader actually stated something important for my work, although he likely did not intend it that way. I have no interest in attracting people whose idea of "research" is surfing the Internet for a few minutes, even though that is more than 99% of the people who use the Internet. I am purposely trying to keep those kinds of people away from my work, as they can stumble into people like Bill the BPA Hit Man in their naïveté and gawking, and it can end badly for them.

That is also another reason why when I get my own forum going, anonymity will not be allowed for the choir. They have to muster at least that much courage to join the choir. It will be a minimum standard of courage and integrity, and anybody whom I really seek will far surpass that level. There is a lot that is bad about the Internet culture, and anonymity is part of it. Nobody associated with me will be anonymous to Godzilla, I can guarantee you.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
11th June 2014, 00:32
Hi:

I have now updated all of my Dennis essays:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hitman.htm

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm

and do not have any plans to significantly revise them in the future, but I never know what is coming. I added a bunch of documents, to flesh out the support for his preposterous journey.

Now off to other essays to tweak.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
13th June 2014, 13:44
Hi:

I have been working hard on editing, and I just added a bunch of images to my big essay. Most of the essay's images can be accessed by clicking on links in the essay, but I could tell that some readers need the images in the body of the essay to assist their understanding. The images are intended to both help make complex ideas easier to understand, and to also positively engage the emotions. I am attaching some of the images that I composed myself.

Adding more images may be making the essay larger than some mobile devices can handle. I may make an imageless one for those who cannot handle the essay's size, although it really is not very large; it is far smaller than a typical YouTube video, for instance. I am not going to break the essay into pieces. Those who can't handle it with their current technology will have to wait until it can. Anybody whom I really seek will not let that hamper them.

The feedback that I am getting from some world class scientists and academics is that the essay is formidable and will make a splash. Kind of funnily, some scientifically illiterate people have lost interest because it does not cater to their fringe predilection, usually in an area where I have spent considerable time and found to be invalid, and around conspiracist stuff often enough. Nobody is going to legitimately be able to pigeonhole that essay. It is certainly not a paean to establishment science, nor is it a tribute to fringe topics. I really did not spill much cyber-ink at all on the fringe stuff that I found to be invalid, but I do take on the limits of orthodoxy. I have done it before, but I am going to reflect on my crazy journey here a little more.

I am an accountant by profession, and recently had to tote up some of the financial aspects of my journey. During my adult journey, my household income has been several million dollars so far, and will hopefully be several million more before I am done, but I have also bankrolled Dennis, Brian, Mr. Professor, and my family and friends. Other than helping Dennis, Brian, and Mr. Professor (which was always an honor), nearly everybody else that I helped ended up attacking me. That is just part of the path. I have passed up more than a million dollars five times on my journey so far (ranging from $1 to $100 million, and twice I knew/suspected it as I passed it up, and three times it became obvious in retrospect, but I have no regrets), including the million dollars that it likely cost me to write the big essay. The price of my journey has been that I have gone bankrupt, have never owned my own home, had to forego having children, and just a few years ago, for the first and likely last time in my life, I bought myself a car, and I still wonder if I am going to end up homeless before it is all over. That has been just the financial part, and that was the easy part. The toll on my family (I have no immediate family in my life anymore), friendships (I lost many friendships due to my journey, as those around me had their egos get in the way, and they usually ended up attacking me, which is normal for this path, as people like Dennis, Brian, Mr. Professor, and others informed me: "Wade, join the club!") was far harder, and it also took a toll on my health, both physical and emotional, and the hard years are starting to catch up to me, which was one reason why I took the year off to write the essay; do it while I still could.

Even while writing the essay, the slings and arrows came without mercy, and as I have been getting to the end of this process, I can tell that my unseen "friends" have been pulling my strings once again. That is a very mixed blessing, let me tell you, and I decided many years ago that I have not wanted to hear from that damned voice again:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#journey

and so far, it has honored my request. I have paid enough, and it is time for others to begin to pick up the ball.

What I have envisioned and the effort I am mounting with my essay is heavy mental and emotional lifting, but anybody who aspires to be in the choir will have to do the work. Almost nobody on Earth has the integrity or gumption to do it (talent enters into the picture, but I am gambling that people do not need to be geniuses to understand), but they only have to be one-in-a-million in the general population for my approach to work. Nobody needs to be a hero, although amassing the personal integrity to lay aside one's scarcity-based teddy bears is far beyond what almost any human on Earth today is willing or able to muster. So, in one respect, I am asking a lot, and in others, I am not asking much at all, not when the effort can save humanity's and Earth's bacon, and turn Earth into something that resembles heaven.

Today is a chore day. I am clearing the decks for the resumption of my career, and will have to amass and lead the choir in my "spare" time.

I am also attaching a pic from Wednesday's hike. I have also been richly compensated on my journey, in many ways, and hiking in fairy tale woods is part of that compensation. Wednesday's hike was like something out of a dream.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
14th June 2014, 12:33
Hi:

As my pals bang away at the essay, and I do my own banging, reorganizing, and enhancing, I have a little slack time where I will edit my site's big essays, and then get ready to get my forum going, and see what happens. Again, I have designed what I am doing for a long, slow, comprehensive effort, not some flash in the pan, not some stampede, etc. I can easily use my work for the rest of my life on this effort.

I am receiving all sorts of suggestions. They are all well-meaning, but most of them are not quite aligned with my intention. I keep getting suggestions for making it into a book, doing conferences, making movies, and so on. All of those kinds of activities raise the risk to me, if nothing else, and I do not want Godzilla to roll out of bed to deal with me. He has stepped on me before, and it hurt, and he is definitely aware of me. Also, the book/conference/movie mentality is not what I am looking for. I need people to go far deeper. Some are trying to boil my work down into brief and catchy presentations. I will likely be doing a few interviews myself, but those kinds of activities can only be introductory. The reader will then have to do the work, and it will not be easy, although I am attempting to make the process as easy as I can.

The ideal choir aspirant will begin reading my essay and will not come up for air for several months, and will be doing deep gestation of the material. My intent for my readers is achieving a paradigm shift, and maybe more than one. If a person really understands my message, he/she will also understand why I am doing what I am, and what the potential of a choir is. A choir like I have in mind has never been amassed on Earth before.

The choir will not be discussing the latest FE inventor-of-the-hour or the latest TED talk on YouTube. It will be discussing the latest scientific papers on the various subjects that my essay covers. It is going to stay away from all the predilections that we see in the FE field today, in its state of arrested development, with tinkering inventors, scientists with their theories, people thinking that they are the messiah:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=825669&viewfull=1#post825669

and the rest of that unproductive three-ring circus. Again, I pretty much do not want to have anything to do with the FE field as it exists today, and that includes whatever Dennis is trying. The FE inventor with the goods who wants to open-source his work and give it away – that I am interested in. But I have not seen that inventor yet, and there is not any group yet amassed who can take it forward. The technical project will be formidable. The choir will also come to understand that a tinkerer revolution will not work for FE, or at least has never come close to working. The intention for the choir is to create a harmonic effect around a new paradigm, to attract enough people for the technical project of making the first production-ready FE device. The technical project is way harder than it seems to people with no R&D experience. The efforts that we see out there, with somebody putting out some plans for the tinkerers to have at, do not work. It will not be something done in a garage, and it will only need to be done once. Once that production-ready model exists, then the world can have at it. I plan for there to be governance, mainly around safety, but that will be about it. Once principles of harmlessness and safety are enforced by those grandmothers, then the fun can begin. But truly, it should not take long before safety and harmlessness become universal principles, and anything else will be seen as irredeemably stupid and nobody will have to be reminded anymore, kind of like how not commingling sewage systems and water supplies are universally understood today.

What not even Dennis really understood is that an FE device will mean the end of civilization as we know it. I know that anti-gravity comes with FE, and it will quickly mean an end to the capitalist mode of production and the ownership class. Poverty, environmental destruction, cities, and capitalism will begin to disappear, and everything will change, radically, as the Fifth Epochal Event transpires. One thing that my essay makes very clear is that tapping the new energy source was each previous epochal event, and then the world changed in ways that those living before the change could not imagine:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827022&viewfull=1#post827022

At least for this one, we have Star Trek and visions like Roads's:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

but those are only hints. Without FE, however, none of it is possible. I rarely look at YouTube, especially to get any ideas, but somebody had me watch this recently:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mlt6kaNjoeI

and for Ted, that was not bad. I almost never watch TED, which I regard as infotainment. But that kid represents the Internet's open-source culture expanded into other areas. Unfortunately, people like him are also usually Level 3s:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

but he is somebody whom I will seek to attract to my essay. I will not spend too much time with people like him, as I have played the game with Level 3s and saw how entrenched and defended they were, as did Brian, etc. I will try to make them aware of my work, and then just see what happens. If they begin to get it, then they will get more of my time. I do not know what the numbers will end up being, but not many like that kid will get past Level 3, but for those who do, getting to Level 12 will be relatively easy for them, as they have already discarded the capitalist stuff. Again, if a person can discard one of the scarcity-based ideologies:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

the others are easier to discard, if they do not get stuck in the "laws of physics" and structuralist traps. This is going to be a long haul, but the biggest event in the human journey will not happen overnight. And for those whom I attempt to attract to my work, they will soon understand the epochal nature of FE, and will not go flitting off into the flavor of the day. The advent of FE will dwarf everything else happening on the planet today and everything that ever happened in the human journey.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Limor Wolf
14th June 2014, 16:40
Originally posted by Wade Frazier: " I rarely look at YouTube, especially to get any ideas, but somebody had me watch this recently:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mlt6kaNjoeI

and for Ted, that was not bad. I almost never watch TED, which I regard as infotainment. But that kid represents the Internet's open-source culture expanded into other areas. Unfortunately, people like him are also usually Level 3s:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

but he is somebody whom I will seek to attract to my essay. I will not spend too much time with people like him, as I have played the game with Level 3s and saw how entrenched and defended they were, as did Brian, etc. I will try to make them aware of my work, and then just see what happens"

Hi Wade,

Sounds like a healthy attitude. This seems like a serious turn in thinking and it is very encouraging! there might not be huge leaps of faith right away, especially for those who are not familiar with anything but fossil fuels and ecological/renewable solutions, this is probably the most difficult pothole for anyone to pass, but it is also something provable for those who are willing to look, and your essey and knowledge and life experience may bring people closer to the free energy kernel.

This confident guy speaks about economy, about low cost open sourcing, about creative housing solutions and hints about the government's reference to it's people as consumers. (also saw on his Twitter that he follows 'Tesla Motors', free patents of electric energy use in cars) This might not be enough, and there are some big gaps (not to say huge!) to fill in one's worldview for it to align with the real reality outside our doorstep, but it is seeding and implanting with creative minds that may bring tomorrow's harvesting, it is understandable that you do not hold your breath, as it might take more than the average minute to acknowledge the possibility of FE, but it is a good idea to plant roots that may one day rise to the surface. Your work is a very excellent catalyst for this to happen in potential. Just backing you up here :)

Many blessings ~

Limor

Wade Frazier
14th June 2014, 17:40
Hi Limor:

Wrapping one's mind around my work is going to be very heavy lifting, even for that guy. Once people can really glimpse it, my approach will also make more sense. FE will dwarf every other event in human history, and is currently being subjected to history's biggest cover-up, along with the related ET cover-up. The standard approaches have not worked and are unlikely to. Books, conferences, TV, movies, and so on are the old skins for spreading the information, just like patents, corporations, garage tinkerers, and the like have been the failed vessels on making the technology happen. My work is a next-generation work, even epochal, on several levels. My essay will be an online textbook. I have designed the essay so that it can be hosted anywhere on the Internet.

For serious readers, I see them taking it a chapter at a time, probably with a break each time, for digging deeper, reflecting, integrating, and so on, before moving on to the next chapter. Some may do a quick first skim before going deeper on certain areas, and that can also work, although my style is slow digestion and integration, and then it sinks in. I highly doubt that people who approach my work from a superficial level are going to get much out of it. The material is designed for deep thinkers. Only deep thinkers are going to have the paradigm shift, because it is the foundation of the paradigm that needs to change, not its superstructure or paint job. And achieving that in today's world is no easy task. But if enough people can, then the pursuit of FE may have a chance. Joe Average will not begin to awaken until FE is delivered to his home. That was one of the primary lessons of my journey, which newbies always resist, thinking that they can turn their families, friends, and colleagues on to the idea of FE, and watch their eyes light up. The opposite usually happens. If I can't even touch those around me much, how do newbies stand a chance? I have seen many veterans in the FE field who were so naïve that they were truly a danger to themselves and others. Understanding my message will not be easy, even for people in the FE field, and they are really not my target audience. I am probably mainly seeking people who never heard of FE before, and are not already biased by the field's arrested development.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
14th June 2014, 19:04
Hi:

All of these have been published before, but I put them all in one place (and pretty small) in my big essay.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 14:15
Hi:

I regularly get some pretty interesting correspondence, and I am regularly directed to some YouTube presentation, usually with the idea that I will see how similar somebody else's work is to mine. While I see plenty of "visionaries" and activists out there, nobody has my message that I have seen. My message is one of love, abundance, a comprehensive perspective, and it comes from somebody who was in the FE trenches and has been at it for forty years. For better or worse, there is nobody else like me that I know of, and whenever I see those other "visionaries" and activists, I almost always see them singing the song of scarcity, even when they ponder FE.

Some in the FE field know the cloak-and-dagger part of it better than I do. But I suffered from it like the best of them did, too, and know enough to know how it works, and know enough to know that nobody can hope to compete with Godzilla in that aspect of the game, so I do not. I am in the open, hiding from nobody. If Godzilla wants me dead, I will be dead, but I am gambling that that will not be the case.

What I constantly see, if people get beyond denial of FE, is that they get stuck in the FE field's arrested development, where the focus is on inventors and tinkerers, raising money, getting patents, retail politics, and the like (and they either deny Godzilla's existence or get spun up in conspiracism, and neither is a healthy reaction). When Dennis got into the heat pump field:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#lamco2

it suffered from a similar arrested development. I am no longer interested in the business approach to FE, and the end of "business" will come with FE. The open-source and "Wiki" movements are baby steps in the right direction. When FE and abundance reigns, the concepts of hoarded wealth and elites will become obsolete. That is what scares Godzilla, but it is also what scares almost everybody, as they all dream of riches in a world of poverty. All that people can see is that the world will end as they know it, but that happened with each Epochal Event:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827022&viewfull=1#post827022

That universal fear response is a huge part of the problem, where everybody's fear is preventing a world of love and abundance from manifesting. It really is a bizarre conundrum to ponder, but the only way out is love and enlightenment.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 15:33
Hi:

Briefly, I have been asked what kinds of "clean-up" projects could commence with FE and related technologies. I have an entire chapter of my essay devoted to it, and writing my response recalled some ideas that I may revise my essay for. In brief:

If there was limitless clean energy, the easy early remediations would be:

1. Remove all the gases from the atmosphere that humans have introduced (excess carbon dioxide, methane, artificial chemicals like chlorofluorocarbons, etc.), and no more would be introduced, so it would be a short-term project.

2. Mine all the dumps on Earth and turn them back into their constituent elements, or close enough so they can be used again.

3. Clean up all the garbage in the oceans;

4. For nuclear dumps, they can also be remediated with Brown’s Gas and other technologies, but for something like that, I can see a facility set up on the Moon, for instance, where all that nuclear waste can be taken for remediation; I would advocate that any potentially dangerous technologies and practices be moved off-world. There should be very little of that after the transition.

5. Remove almost all earthly infrastructure. Cities will become obsolete, as will stuff like roads and bridges. Most urban environments would get remediated back into natural environments (like turning Manhattan back into forest).

6. A lot of the “remediation” is developing new ways to produced human goods that are non-toxic, etc., which have usually been because of energy scarcity.

7. Clean up all space junk and near-Earth asteroids, rocks, and comets.


What I think is more important are new methods of living that inflict no harm at all on the biosphere, and it kind of dovetails with the cleanup. My chapter on the fifth epochal event covers a lot of that territory, so no need to belabor it, but…

A. Chemists can make chiral molecules today, so making whatever we want from the constituent atoms is not far off, like the 3D printing that is a precursor to Star Trek's replicators. On a related note, thermal depolymerization breaks the molecules down, not to the elemental level, but still keeps the carbon bonds. I am not sure how necessary that level of breaking it down would be, but it at least would eliminate some steps of breaking it down to the elemental level and then rebuilding organic molecules.

B. I know that antigravity technology also exists, and with FE, the entire solar system, including the Kuiper belt and beyond, becomes humanity’s hinterland; there would be no need to ever mine Earth again for anything.

C. All food raising could be done in environments that exist outside of the ecosphere, and would not even need sunlight. There are debates over how “natural” it would be, and that is likely a worthwhile discussion, but the concept of causing no ecosystem harm should be the first principle, and the second would be how “natural” it would be. Co-creating with nature is certainly possible, but only after we clean up our mess and respect nature, not raping it with abandon, as humanity has been doing for 60,000 years or so.

Even stuff like the pyramids, Great Wall of China, and other monuments would be torn down, with maybe pieces kept in a museum to commemorate humanity's primitive past.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 16:05
Hi:

As I have been reviewing the "visions" section of my essay, I see that I overlooked an obvious one, which may be because my essay is an intended antidote to the practice. I just added:

"What is called "education" today is usually indoctrination into scarcity-based ideologies and practices, where social control is the primary goal. Often the result is negative learning and beating creativity and insight out of people. Those kinds of mind-and-soul-numbing practices will vanish, and learning will become fun."

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 16:51
Hi:

Before I go hard at today's chores, I have been meaning to make a post about some recent reading, but have kept forgetting to. I was one of the first The Far Side fans, as Gary Larson's strip first found prominence in the LA Times, which I read every day in college, when The Far Side came out in 1980:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Far_Side

I wrote The Far Side kinds of things in high school, and one I recall in particular (I still have it lying in a box in my home) is: "The giant octopus [or was it a squid? - Ed.] engulfed the struggling scuba diver."

I was also a fan of Herman and some other inspired cartoons, but Calvin and Hobbes was the Big One. I lived in Ohio during Watterson's heyday, and a friend worked at Kenyon College, raising money from their graduates such as Paul Newman and Watterson, so the Calvin and Hobbes phenomenon kind of happened in my backyard, and Larson is also from Seattle.

I have a bunch of the books containing those cartoons, and I have been recently reading a biography of Watterson and his Calvin and Hobbes days, and I have lately been feeling similar pressure regarding my essay. Watterson fiercely resisted the practice of turning cartoons into corporate juggernauts, with underlings making the strips forever, with plastering the cartoon characters all over everything. His battles with everybody trying to cash in on his characters is what largely drove him into retirement, and he was constantly fending off Hollywood (such as Spielberg and Lucas), who wanted to make movies out of his strip.

While FE is much different territory than a cartoon strip, I find myself in a similar situation to Watterson's, as people around me keep asking me to publish books, go Hollywood, do speaking tours, and the rest of that nonsense. None of that will engage the audience that I am looking for, and not only will it put me at risk, it will also tend to compromise the integrity of my work. An almost universal response, by those not attacking me, is trying to find some way for me to cash in (and them probably cashing in, too). That kind of self-seeking is the devil's flypaper for work like mine, but in a world of scarcity, people cannot begin to fathom my motivation. I sigh each time that I get that "helpful" advice. I have to do it my way. Nobody but me knows the best way to go about what I am doing. I spent many years living my adventures and doing the study behind my essay, and making the material the best that I possibly could was the top priority. The past month or so has been about making it easier to digest for my readers, and that has been the normal process of my work. I am not watering my work down at all, but I am trying to make it a little easier to understand, but for anybody, understanding my work will be heavy lifting, as its purpose is to help people understand how the world really works and to shed their scarcity-based outlook and begin to comprehend abundance. My intended audience knows it will not be easy work, but worthwhile. It may be worthwhile in ways that almost none of us can truly comprehend, even me.

It just might be a critical missing piece of making FE, abundance, and a healed humanity and planet manifest, but it might "only" be something to help improve the understanding of my readers. Yesterday, I had a long talk with my wife on the subject. Often, an artist will know when they produce their best work, and they appreciate it while it is happening, and while they may continue to strive to better it, they also can come to appreciate that they reached a height of not only their creative powers but also their connection with their audience, which will never be surpassed. It is like catching lightning in a bottle. Watterson, Rowling, The Beatles, and many other artists knew when they hit their goldmine, of their creative potential, audience connection, and commercial peak, and they knew that they would never see its like again. That is what I think will be the case with my essay, and I took the year off to do it while I still could. I will not do anything like it again in this lifetime, and I am OK with that. I am not done with my FE efforts, not by any means, but what I am finishing up will be the peak of my "art," and it is all downhill from here. :)

Best,

Wade

Robert J. Niewiadomski
15th June 2014, 18:11
Hi:

As I have been reviewing the "visions" section of my essay, I see that I overlooked an obvious one, which may be because my essay is an intended antidote to the practice. I just added:

"What is called "education" today is usually indoctrination into scarcity-based ideologies and practices, where social control is the primary goal. Often the result is negative learning and beating creativity and insight out of people. Those kinds of mind-and-soul-numbing practices will vanish, and learning will become fun."

Back to work.

Best,

WadeThis kind of "education" that is about to manifest in FE world is approximated nowdays in the form of "Free (or Democratic) Schools" (http://www.eudec.org/Graduate+Stories) :)
You can watch "Summerhil (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxngqMavda0)" on You Tube (1hr 49 mins)
Albany Free School (http://vimeo.com/16115695) (1hr 8 mins)
or Sudburry Valey School (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXC67kw-4app_LcL5yR7GqQ) (YouTube channel)
to get an idea.

Children are completely free to choose what they want to learn there but that doesn't mean they are not cared for. My general impression of that kind of "schools" is: fun :)

Generally, it is "education" tailored to and driven by children specific interest at the moment. The main premise is the human brain is designed to learn and doesn't need to be forced into learning. The second is that of human being is not an empty vessel to be filled but a seed, complete with everything, to be nourished and provided with everything necessary to express it's potential.

It's not perfect compared to Michael Roads relations, as they still struggle to make the ends meet :( But at least children learn to think for themselves :)

EDIT:
There are at least three Free Schools in Washington State:
THE CLEARWATER SCHOOL, 1510 196th St. SE Bothell, WA, 98012
http://clearwaterschool.com/?page_id=9
The Trillium School, Indianola, WA 98342
http://www.trilliumschool.org/admissions/visit
Puget Sound Community School, 660 S Dearborn St, Seattle, WA 98134
http://pscs.org/visit-us/

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 19:20
Thanks Robert:

I see many, many good ideas and practices that are hamstrung and infeasible due to scarcity. One of my goals is awakening "visionaries" to how FE can ramp up their vision by a few orders of magnitude. Most cannot handle how it stretches their minds, but some can.

Einstein was a teacher by training, but could not find work for years. I recall that once he was given an unruly class to teach, and amidst the spitballs and the like he announced that anybody who wanted to be someplace else was free to leave. The stunned students just stared at him, and he began a "class" that was more of an exploration of what the students were curious about, and he was a hit. Of course, the Einstein "curriculum" did not catch on, except in some fringe schools. :)

Back to work,

Wade

Robert J. Niewiadomski
15th June 2014, 20:46
Thanks Wade,

I was not aware of Einstein's "free school" attitude :) Good to know :)

Wade Frazier
15th June 2014, 21:37
Hi Robert:

Einstein was unusual in many ways. He likely had Asperger's Syndrome or something similar in the autism spectrum, like Isaac Newton and Bill Gates. He womanized, but was also a great voice of conscience. Gandhi was the only politician that he had much respect for. I have previously related a conversation that somebody I met had with Einstein:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=98027&viewfull=1#post98027

Hoover's FBI was all over him, and likely kept him from working on the Manhattan Project (for "national security" reasons), which I am sure suited Einstein just fine. Uncle Albert was something else.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
16th June 2014, 20:41
Hi:

As I have stated, I am getting all sorts of interesting feedback on my essay draft. Scientists and academics are the most impressed, some of whom are world-class, while the scientifically illiterate and non-academic are less so. If all I can get up to speed for the choir are scientists, college professors, and geniuses, then I will have failed with my essay's intent, as they are not really my target audience. I like it when they read my stuff and weigh in on it, to make sure that I am not blowing it anywhere, but I have tried to make it so that people without such credentials can work at achieving comprehensive perspectives. If it is only professors, scientists, and geniuses, I suppose I can work with that, but it greatly limits my population of potential choir members.

I also cannot avoid being exposed to what is happening in the FE milieu, as much as I try to avoid it. I am continually bombarded by the antics of the inventor-of-the-hour, the inventor who thinks he is the Messiah, and the like. I can see that the biggest problems that I am going to have, other than scientific illiteracy (which my essay is intended to help remedy), are naïveté, getting sucked into the FE field's state of arrested development, and people thinking that they have some bright idea about how to make FE happen that nobody has ever thought of before. All of those problems come from people's egos, as they look for quick and easy answers and are unwilling to do the heavy lifting, both mentally and emotionally, that comes with raising one's awareness to the level needed to help manifest the biggest event in the human journey. We have to try to leave our egos at the door and be willing to do the work, if we really want to reach productive levels of understanding.

The bottom line is that if anybody really understands what I am attempting, it is virtually guaranteed that nobody in their daily lives will begin to understand or even want to. That is why I keep stating that I am looking for needles in haystacks, at somewhere less than one-in-a-thousand in the general population, and maybe far less, although my essay is intended to help improve the numbers. My essay is intended to serve a number of purposes, and one of them is that if somebody wants to do some fishing with people in their lives, they can just point them at my essay and stand back. There is no need for people to talk themselves blue in the face, to only find that their audience does not want to hear it and may attack the speaker for his/her trouble. If readers do not dive in and stay submerged for months, they are not whom I am looking for. My work is not for people seeking superficial understandings. They have to go deep. The going deep part is not really as in being a scientific or academic specialist, but at the generalist level, where connections and pattern insights are what I really hope to help people see. I am aiming for a paradigm shift for those who can do so before FE is delivered into their lives. Today, one scientist stated that if readers of my essay understand how it all revolves around energy, the other understandings are easy to achieve. That was my intent. :) We will see if others see it that way.

What I continually encounter is people thinking that they understand the FE milieu, when they do not. If you ever saw The Bourne Ultimatum:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_Ultimatum_%28film%29

there was that scene at the beginning where Bourne was trying to shepherd that reporter through a death-defying situation, and that reporter got things exactly backwards, where he ran away from safety and straight to his doom, because he thought that he knew better than Bourne. Try as he might, Bourne could not save him. That is not too far removed from the how the FE field is. I previously related how Mr. Professor suspected somebody in our company because of his police background:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=698165&highlight=cautionary#post698165

which contributed to that person's death. It broke my heart when Dennis told me what happened. There are extremely few "safe" places to play the FE game at any level, and I constantly see newbies launching straight into disaster, and they think that they are being clever and worldly. I really do not want to watch when newbies do that. The FE terrain is some of the most treacherous and bewildering on Earth, and the saints barely have a chance. When I see prominent people in the FE field embrace the criminals:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#libel

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#libel

I run the other way as fast as I can, especially when they try to suck me into their efforts. A bunch of criminals are not going to help FE manifest, I can guarantee you, unless maybe they are reformed members of Godzilla's organization. But I would never want to interact with Black Hats who allegedly woke up, not at this stage of the game. Rehabilitating Black Hats is not something that anybody should be attempting today, unless they consider their lives forfeit before they begin.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

ulli
16th June 2014, 21:14
I remember reading some si- fi novel years ago...about a team of space explorers on this journey to another planet, and all with the knowledge that by the time they would return to earth 2000 earth years would have passed, even though to them their journey seemed like three months. And just before they reached their destiny, this tiny faster-than-light vehicle zipped past them. Some new generation on earth had figured it all out while our heroes were toodling through space.

So this is my wish....a new humanity. Some of the villagers in these Central American outback mountain valleys are producing the most incredible kids. Which will leave all of us old- timers with jaw-drop.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WdaKALbH6uc/TeTK7kbOXkI/AAAAAAAAAI0/y-Fdr6Jb0Bg/s1600/gary_larson_gifted_comp1.jpg

Wade Frazier
16th June 2014, 22:09
Hi Ulli:

Kind of like Bucky found:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#college

I have found that young people far more easily understand my message than adults do. Young people have not been molded by the scarcity-based ideologies long enough for them to sink to their marrow:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

so they more readily shed their indoctrination. It is the people most invested in the current paradigms - mentally, emotionally, financially - that have the most violent reactions to my work, as they see their world coming to an end.

That contrast has also been reflected in how I am publishing the essay. It is free and only electronic. Those who encourage me to turn my work into a book, a movie, and the like are usually from the over-forty gang. It will likely be the youngsters who make FE happen.

Best,

Wade

Robert J. Niewiadomski
17th June 2014, 13:40
Wade,

Do you think anybody studying your essay is able to tell on her own that she has comprehended it's matter whole, exactly as you intended it? Is that level of self assessment even possible with regard to your work? Or it should rather be an interactive process?

Wade Frazier
17th June 2014, 14:05
Hi:

I have written about it plenty, on orthodoxy, it tools, its limits, and so on. The greatest physicists knew that we know almost nothing about how the universe works, and were keenly aware of the limits of today's science:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

Einstein said that the methods of science were very limited, but they still were the best that we had. It brings up a phenomenon that I have seen innumerable times over the years. While the greatest scientists were keenly aware of science's limits, the hacks and priest class tried to turn it into an arcane and exclusive club. Then non-scientists either worshipped scientists as knowing all the answers, or they entirely rejected mainstream science in favor of some fringe theories (that were nearly always bogus) or believed that the Bible was all they needed. Where are the truth seekers in all of that? Few and far between, as everybody grinds their particular ax. As I stated recently, I constantly see the orthodox positions and findings rejected, although when I query those rejecting the orthodox position, they often do not know that the orthodox position really is. That is a deluded way to go about it. The ideal of science, of reproducible phenomena and falsifiable theories, is the best that has been come up with.

I find similar attitudes toward "intelligence." As that Roads video showed, earlier on this thread:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjrnkh4elgE

he made the distinction between intellect and intelligence. I have seen some of the smartest people I know say some of the stupidest things I ever heard. I know people that have more "intelligence" than I do, and I can see the benefit of it, as well as its limitations. One reason why my essay may work is that I am not that smart, so making the material easier for non-scientists to digest is partly using my own methods for making it digestible. When I have interacted with people whose IQs are in the 160-170 range, I can tell that they can run rings around me, but I also know that I can at least get the concepts they so easily grasp if I work at it long enough. I have seen people dismiss IQ as unimportant. Well, let's see somebody with a low IQ do calculus. You cannot fake math, and while math may be seen as "only" a language, with its particular rules, the mental agility used to do math is what is needed to understand many scientific concepts. When I have seen math and science dismissed by the scientifically illiterate, it has been because they can't understand it, not because they understood it and found it wanting.

However, math has been abused to make science more arcane than it needs to be. Einstein tried to work without math when he could, and one of his sayings was that the more elegant the math used support a theory of behind a physical phenomenon, the more likely the theory was wrong. :) Einstein and Schroedinger wanted to know what was really happening, not cranking out some equation and getting the "right" answer (such as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory).

Humanity has a very strange relationship to the idea of intelligence. The average six-year-old in this world:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672748&viewfull=1#post672748

is smarter and more informed than anybody on the planet today, and it was accomplished with love. If we turn the corner as a species, if we make it to a world like the one Roads saw, the average person will have an IQ of 200 or so, but nobody will be using those abilities to keep Godzilla on top or making neat new weapons. As Bucky said, they would be making livingry, not weaponry:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#livingry

but it all starts in the heart, not the head. The people in this world are "smart," too:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32399-A-Future-Earth&p=672115&viewfull=1#post672115

but they live in their self-created hell. The lower-astral plane is filled with "smart" beings:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#hell

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
17th June 2014, 14:38
Hi Robert:

I saw your post after I just posted my previous one, and it kind of relates to it. Sure, people will generally understand more quickly if I can help guide them. That is the point of teachers, right? :)

However, I am playing a dangerous game – not as dangerous as Dennis, Greer, and Brian O played, but still dangerous – and I tried to make a curriculum that was largely self-study, and there is only one of me. It is harder for the students that way, but a motivated student can get there, and I am looking for people of that motivation. In fact, the essay is really a pre-requisite to being able to sing in the choir. What I have found, many times, is that people get bogged down early on, skip to the end, or lose interest, usually because their pet beliefs are challenged, they do not see the point, and so on. All I can say is that those kinds of people are not in my target audience. While the scientifically illiterate may have a hard time with my essay, I have been trying to make it easy to digest, leaving out as much scientific jargon as possible, pointing readers to where they can go deeper, I have been adding pictures that help make the ideas easier to understand, and the like.

I am kind of looking for people like me. If I was eighteen-years-old and stumbled into the essay I am about to publish, I would not come up for air for months. I am looking for people like that. What David has done is what I am looking for. David read my work for a year before he contacted me, and still goes deep, and then begins to write a little multidisciplinary essay. That is how people are going to learn the song and be able to sing it.

What I do not want to do is answer questions by a person reading chapter 2, where my reply will be to read chapter 10. That is going to be a big waste of my time. My work is not for the lazy. Also, the essay is intended to start with some basics, and then keep building on them, developing a more comprehensive perspective as it goes on, and when readers get to the end, quite a few questions will no longer seem so befuddling. One example is evolution. I have already had readers stop reading because I deal with evolution at length, and the readers did not "believe" in evolution. Why? Well, they just did not like the idea, and they read some fringe tract once that called evolution into question, and their Bible suits them just fine, with Earth really less than 6,000 years old and all that fun stuff. I have yet to encounter a professional biologist who does not consider evolution as a fact (some partial exceptions can be made for some "Christian" biologists who bang their Bibles, but they certainly are not respected in the field, and have never come up with any challenge of substance), and not because they "believe" it, but because they have worked with life and found evolution to be a valid concept, as they could witness its effects.

Another example is global warming. There is not a scientist alive who will deny that carbon dioxide traps radiation and warms Earth. The so-called global warming debate is almost entirely a fraud. Even the "skeptics" who are not on the hydrocarbon lobby's payroll are only arguing for tiny little oscillations or regional effects, which is only quibbling. Declining carbon dioxide levels are the ultimate cause of today's ice age, and increasing them can turn Earth from an icehouse to a hothouse state. That state has not been seen for 50 million years. Now, Greenhouse Earth states were kind of Golden Ages of life on Earth, but the last transition from an Icehouse Earth to a Greenhouse Earth was the greatest mass extinction in Earth's history, called the Permian extinction:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event

We are already in the midst of a mass extinction, and if humanity artificially induces another Greenhouse Earth with its short-lived hydrocarbon age, not many people will survive the transition, and the ultimate species extinctions could rival or exceed the Permian extinction. That is what I am trying to prevent, as well as bring heaven on Earth into being. So, the global warming "debates" we see today, which suck in the scientifically illiterate (who like to think that our egocentric, short-sighted practices are harmless - the easy way out), are really stupid. If somebody reads my essay to the end, the risk of burning hydrocarbons with abandon should be obvious, and they will clearly see the stupidity of today's "debates," where all the early "skeptics" were on the payroll of the hydrocarbon lobby. Al Gore's stuff is not too valid, either, but that is one of the many red herrings in the debate. Looking at the interglacial intervals over the past million years is a poor way to address the subject. People need the 500-million-year perspective, not the million-year one.

I hope that answers your question.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
17th June 2014, 15:09
Hi:

As an addendum to my previous post, I seek learning junkies. They are really rare on Earth. And learning junkies always know that the best teacher is experience. That does not mean that the experiences of others are rejected, especially when those learning experiences are highly dangerous, such as pursuing FE. Eugene Sledge taught me all that I need to know about the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#sledge

which is that there is nothing glorious about it. If you understand that battlefields are evil places, then you understand all you need to know about the glory of war. But if I had not had my radicalizing experiences, I wonder how much I would have really understood, kind of like that friend's son who watched Saving Private Ryan like some boy general (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#ryan ). I can write about mystical stuff all day long, but until people get some mystical experiences under their belts:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#my

they will really have a hard time understanding. My mystical journey began with mind-blowing experiences, not reading some book, and it was that way for everybody that I respect in that field. That is why I say that people have to have had some kind of awakening experience for my work to begin to make sense:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#developing

otherwise, they are the "bright idea" people who I continually encounter, who think they have the magic answer for making FE happen that nobody ever thought of before, as they play boy general who has never been on a battlefield. I never played boy general, and those who do are acting from their egos. I just carried spears for years through unbelievable, bloody terrain, and that was the greatest teacher of all:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#why

Nearly all of my studies have been of the experiential variety, where people who have been there have described what they saw. Those who come up with their empty theories, like the "skeptics":

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#friends

are not where it is happening.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
17th June 2014, 19:13
Hi:

One of the big goals of my essay, probably the number one goal, is for people to begin thinking in epochal and abundant terms. All the time, I am bombarded with "news" of people pursuing "solutions" to our problems that are so mired in scarcity as to be on the opposite end of the spectrum from FE, and I see it in many ways.

One area that I had to deal with recently was the "cleanup," "restoration," and preservation technologies that are advocated, and there are a wide spectrum of them, from saving the last forests from being raped to trying to keep species alive to trying to remediate mine tailings and other industrial waste to so-called "alternative" energy technologies such as windmills. They are all firmly ensconced within the scarcity paradigm. Without abundant energy to get the job done, they all become some kind of "scraping by" exercise, which usually involves various levels of austerity, and they all fall far short of being any kind of real solution. I see it in all directions, and you can see it on this thread, with all the scarcity-based suggestions being made, with all the "news" that we see each day. FE means a paradigm so radically different that almost nobody today even dares to even try to imagine it. I could give hundreds of examples of that dynamic in my own life and what I am bombarded with, even on the "visionary" front.

A "visionary" like Heinberg announced that Earth's carrying capacity in the absence of fossil fuels is less than a billion people (which is actually a typical estimate and likely accurate). He advocated ridding Earth of those excess humans:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#austerity

and the "progressives" and "environmentalists" treated Heinberg like royalty, while Brian O was shut out from those very same venues. Even with Heinberg's preferred "solution" of carpeting every suitable acre of Earth with windmills, Earth would still need to be depopulated to maintain an industrial lifestyle for the remainder.

When Brian just mentioned FE to energy "visionary" Amory Lovins:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

Lovins ran away, shrieking. When Brian had the Venus Project founder to his home for dinner and Brian just mentioned FE, that "visionary" flew into a foaming-at-the-mouth tirade. That is the "normal" reaction, even by "visionaries," and I have absolutely no interest in engaging any of them. People need to unhook from the conventional BS if they are going begin to think epochally. Brian kept trying to engage that crowd to the very end, but that was his trip, not mine, even while I carried his spears. In Brian's last years, he tried to find an assistant to crunch the numbers to show how unviable traditional alternative energy was. Brian wrote what became the USA's alternative energy policy back in his Capitol Hill days:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#udall

and Brian eventually realized that it went nowhere:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#udall

Dennis sold the most viable traditional alternative energy technology that I know of:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#new

but it did not matter. He brought the field out of its arrested development, where it was all scientists and tinkerers, like the FE field is today, and then Godzilla got involved to wipe us out, and our "allies" did more damage than Godzilla did. Brian and Dennis kept trying to interact with the energy establishment, the "progressives," and other groups, and they were all essentially Level 10 efforts:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level10

Again, I am doing something radically different, and there is no group on Earth today that comprehends my message, and that is OK. I am going to have to roll my own. Every epochal event was incomprehensible to the people who lived before it happened.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=827022&viewfull=1#post827022

It will take very deep work for aspiring choir members to begin to understand, and they are not going to get there via YouTube videos, the mainstream media, the "progressives," or the conspiracists. They are all stuck in scarcity and thinking that is far too shallow to really comprehend my message.

The people I am looking for will not be stuck in the mentality of telling their family, friends, neighbors, and colleagues about FE and the Fifth Epochal Event. That will not work, and is not what my work is about, but almost everybody wants to pour the new wine into the old skins. I am trying something different. I have a technology and method of broadcasting my message to the world in a way that did not exist when I began my journey. I am looking for needles in haystacks, and I know it. I doubt that even Dennis or Brian could really understand what I am attempting, but they would have come close. In recent years, I saw them begin to think in the direction that I have been thinking of for the past decade or so. Will my plan work? Beats me, but if I can get enough people unhooked from the conventional stuff, and if they can refrain from thinking that they need to proselytize, then we will be getting somewhere. People need to let go of their scarcity-based, socialized ways of thinking and think epochally. It will not be easy, and thinking that the current establishment structures have any promise is part of the problem, as people continue to chase down the same dead-end paths that the greatest people I ever knew have traveled.

It is time for a different approach; a radically different one. Nobody has ever amassed an abundance choir before, or even trained hardly anybody to begin thinking in terms of abundance, because scarcity is all that humanity has known. There were some brief "Golden Ages," before humanity burned through the new energy resource that they learned to tap, and they gave us some glimpses of what abundance might look like, and I lived during the greatest one that humanity has yet experienced: the USA's postwar boom. But it only gave a glimpse, and that window closed with the 1973/1974 energy crisis, only a few years after the USA reached Peak Oil.

The FE Revolution will dwarf everything that has happened in the human journey so far. That is, to put it mildly, big stuff. Anybody who sets their mind to comprehending abundance is not wasting their time. Almost nobody has the strength and integrity to do that, as they fall back into their conditioning, and frankly, watching YouTube and surfing the Internet is far easier than thinking deeply. There will be nothing easy about what I am asking my audience to do, but I am also not asking anybody to risk their lives, as the typical FE effort exposes people to, if they ever do anything productive.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
18th June 2014, 13:24
Hi:

There are a few reasons why I put up chapters drafts as I went along, and one of them was to prove that I wrote them. While I have always given away my work, I have been plagiarized and even impersonated. One plagiarist was a professional Hollywood writer. Being impersonated was weird. My essay will be the last like it in my lifetime, and I would not put it past somebody to claim that he/she wrote the essay and try to legally enjoin me from publishing it. That could be considered a bizarre Godzilla tactic, but it could just be another low-integrity move from the public. I am aware of David Icke's royalty issues, but I am not seeking any compensation; I am just trying to publish it without somebody legally encumbering me, or bringing the work's integrity into question. One time when I was plagiarized, I was accused of the plagiarism. That was bizarre, but I was also able to prove that I published my work before the plagiarist did.

Just yesterday, I was reading something online that seemed like the author plagiarized me. While plagiarism is not exactly a noble deed, that the person you stole from can be accused of being the thief is one of the downsides of that kind of behavior.

Also, I write pretty distinctively, which makes it harder to "prove" that I was the plagiarist.

I am hard at work, editing the medical essay. It is turning into a bit of a chore, but I am glad I am doing it. Some things have changed for the better over the years. For the first time ever, medical authorities are admitting that heart disease is at least partly reversible by lifestyle – mainly diet – changes, and that has partly been responsible for declining artery disease deaths in the USA. In the 1980s, the booklet that saved my father's life was banned in the USA for suggesting that heart disease was reversible:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#lessons

So, some progress has been made. The AMA no longer promotes cigarettes.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#cigarettes

But fluoride is still "medicine" in the West:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm

The medical gangsters have not all retired, but seeing some progress against the forces of evil is nice to see.

Best,

Wade

Ilie Pandia
19th June 2014, 12:22
"They have to start to think epochally"

This is really a problem and is likely related to the personal integrity issue. "If it does not affect it me in my life time, then... screw this! somebody else will mop up the mess and they will have better tech than I do now!"

Or: "why on Earth would I bother with this effort when I will likely be dead by the time there is a dent made? Better install my own solar panels and wind mills and let the others fend for themselves. Life is short and the path to Free Energy is too long and arduous... way too long..."

It's also interesting when you compare Brian O and and Dennis's work with other energy "visionaries"... it drives the point home! I hear nowadays all the time about solar panels. "Let's carpet the streets", they say, "we just need to raise the money to make this a viable solution!"

When you don't get excited by stuff like that you look like you're part of the "bag guys": "Don't you want alternative energy!? What's wrong with solar panels?! Hey buddy.. are you one of those fossil fuel guys? What do you meant too little too late!? It's proven tech!"

And Dennis Lee was actually giving away his energy systems. At one point you would pay only from the energy savings and later on you would just buy the information kit (and you could even ask your money back if you did not like it). The point being: Dennis was doing this at huge scale at zero risk for the customer and look what happened to him... and now we want to carpet the streets with solar panels.

It's funny (in a dark way), because from a certain level it looks like everything is fine, there is no suppression going on and there is a plethora of visionaries and technologies just waiting to be funded. If you hint that you may get into trouble and fast, if you put tech on the market in a disruptive way, they say you're crazy... nobody is suppressing this or that person? How come this or that can still speak and are alive and well?

And yet... few have heard of Brian O, Dennis Lee and Wade Frazier and even fewer took the time to dig the truth out. :) (when I've first heard of Dennis' heat pump, while it made sense, I quick filed him as a "quack" for having an arrest warrant issued on his name. Nobody goes to prison if they're really innocent, right?).

So yes, we need to start to think epochally. Then we will realize that solar panel and wind mills will just not do. And we will also see energy at the root of everything so it will be much easier to keep the eye on the ball.

Wade Frazier
19th June 2014, 13:37
Hi Ilie:

When I came up with my "Free Energy Onion" idea of presentation:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#peeling

I was "stealing" from Brian, as he remarked that as he dove into the FE field, there were all of these layers of truth that he had to peel through to really get at the heart of it all. He was on his way to thinking epochally when he did that. As I have stated repeatedly, people have to have some kind of awakening experience, so that they can begin peeling those layers. Otherwise, they remain trapped by their conditioning. A similar analogy is not peeling through layers to get at some core truth, but peeling away at the layers of our prison, to escape to freedom.

Yes, the egocentrism that you cite is a big part of the problem, and people trapped by their egos will not be any help in manifesting FE, but that is OK. I do not expect or need much more than 0.001% of humanity to help manifest FE. The rest will be trapped in their egos, at least until abundance reigns. Godzilla knows what he is doing, and keeping people mired in scarcity keeps him on top. Again, when you begin playing the game at a level where you get the "honor" of being stepped on by Godzilla, you actually develop a kind of grudging admiration for his efforts. He is dedicated, if nothing else, and has plenty of talent on his team. The light and the dark teams are dedicated to something other than comfort. That is why God can use dark workers as light workers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#love

Anybody who has played the Level 10 game for long reaches a point where they are disgusted with humanity.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#disgust

It just comes with the territory. The best of them, however, have learned to see beyond people's frightened egos, to see their potential if they contacted their souls. In a world of scarcity and fear, almost nobody is going to hear from their souls, as their horizons are defined by their immediate self-interest.

All of those so-called activists, who think that windmills and solar panels are the solution, are trapped by their conditioning, but I have to hand it to them: they are at least trying something. Some from that crowd will become part of the choir, but only some.

The feedback that I am getting from scientists and academics is that there is definitely plenty of meat on the bones of my essay, where people can chew for the rest of their lives, and that was my intent. It is only by chewing through the layers that people will develop epochal perspectives. Again, epochal perspectives have never really been seen on Earth before. For each previous epochal event, there were no visionaries helping it come into being. They were just trying to survive and came up with an invention here and there that ended up tapping into a new energy source.

What I am trying to form – a core of visionaries who can see the coming paradigm before it manifests – has never been seen before on Earth, not in any way that is practical. I know that such a "choir" won't hurt, and my goal for it is to "infect" about ten times its number, and then the practical manifestation of FE will be easy, as the organized suppression and humanity's inertia will not be able to stop it. As I have mentioned many times, almost nobody wants to hear about FE and a healed planet, because all they see is their world coming to an end, not the manifestation of heaven on Earth, and that is because they are trapped in an egocentric awareness. Arriving at a soul-centric awareness on Earth today is no easy trick, and those who can reach it before abundance reigns will realize that almost nobody else will be able to achieve it. But they know that people will have one hell of a good chance of achieving it if scarcity and fear vanished as the primary operating principles of society.

I really am not going to be trying to convince any of the 99.999% of humanity that is unable or unwilling to imagine abundance, but the 0.001% who can. My essay and the Internet are going to give me a way to fish for them. Could it become something bigger? Maybe, but I am not counting on it and do not need it for my plan to work. And maybe we will live to see it all happen. :)

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
19th June 2014, 14:24
Hi:

One question that will come up plenty when my essay is published, and has been asked many times before, is how the hell I was able to do it. One answer is that I could not have done it without the help of my friends. :) I have been blessed with some great ones. But people have also looked at Dennis and voiced similar sentiments, or Brian. By far the most important quality was that they cared. The rest is really pretty insignificant, when compared to that.

But they also had other qualities that allowed them to do it. As my first interviewer told me, all the visionaries he met from around the world had their hearts in the right place, first (I had to voice that, but he immediately admitted that that was obvious and assumed), and they also all had high intelligence and high energy. Pretty much everybody who I respected in the FE field is/was a genius, so that helped, and they all had great energy.

And for a Dennis or Brian, they also had a focus that could be called obsessive. That can also apply to me, but did we focus on FE because we were just a bunch of obsessive-compulsives, or because we comprehended the issue's magnitude? Good question. I am in the autism spectrum, but other than my focus on FE and a healed planet, I do not seem to be obsessive about much else, although my wife may have a different opinion. :)

Some personality aspects do not really seem all that important, or soul roles:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#michael

I am an Artisan, Dennis is likely a King, Brian was likely a Sage, and Dennis's wife is likely a Server. Dennis and Brian are/were extroverts, while I am an introvert. I think that only older souls are going to have much interest in FE, and for those who do not like the soul-age concept, another way to say it is that the people that I respected in the FE field were all deep thinkers, introspective, and tended to seek the big picture.

So, a caring heart, high intelligence, high energy, a big-picture orientation, and "obsessive" focus seem to be what is required to play the FE Game, and it is very likely that almost everybody in the choir will have those qualities in some measure, but the effort will not be looking for heroes. :)

Going hiking now.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th June 2014, 11:41
Hi:

One thing I am doing with the essay is walking the line between making it understandable by laypeople but not dumbing it down. Understanding the essay's material will take work, and comprehensive and pretty high level understandings will be the reward, the kind that will make the reader a useful member of an effort to make FE happen, and have no doubt, that is my ultimate goal. It really is not an essay for the masses, and I am drawing a line and trying to maintain it, where I am not dumbing it down. If I dumb it down, I will be shooting for a lowest-common denominator, and if I do that, I will not be getting the audience I seek.

One thing I have seen repeatedly over the years is people advocating ideas that are energy dependent and unfeasible at the level of available energy in today's world. For instance, all manner of people have bandied about the idea of abundance, but that is an energy concept above all else. Without energy abundance, there can be no abundance, and there has never really been energy abundance before. All seeming abundance and "golden ages" of the human past were only the relative and fleeting appearance of abundance that came with plundering a new energy source, and quickly ended as the energy source was depleted.

In my essay, I address how the economics profession does not deal with the real world, as it assumes that the "market" magically makes things appear. For one thing, there is no free market and never has been, and for another, I may have the "freedom" to go to the moon, but without some prodigious supply of energy, I am not going to get there. I regularly see people propose fuzzy ideas of abundance and solutions that are in no way practical without FE. But getting people to understand the issue can be challenging. Yesterday, I was thinking of an easy way to make the idea understandable, and here are some.

Imagine the USS Enterprise of Star Trek being coal-fired. :) Or with sails, or borne on a palanquin by slaves. Without the vast energy resources provided by the mythical substances in the warp drives, star travel would be impossible in the Star Trek world.

The world could not have industrialized on wood, plain and simple. A deforested England turned to coal, and the Industrial Revolution was born. Europe had also been using wind and water power like no other civilization ever had, before England embraced coal, and wind and water power were competitive with coal until the mid-1800s. Without exploiting the energy of wind, water, and coal, Europe would have never risen and kicked humanity's butt.

Harnessing water in mills became the heart of European civilization, and produced the work of many millions of people before the technical feat of harnessing the wind on the world's oceans was achieved, which allowed Europe to conquer the world. Europe's feats were energy feats above all else. Any nation that does not have access to fossil fuel energy, or the means to exploit it, is poor and "backwards" compared to industrialized nations.

One of the most obvious indicators of a society's level of energy use is the status of women:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#status

Before industrialization, women were barefoot and pregnant, giving birth to the strong backs of an agrarian economy. The rise of machines of industrialization made physical labor less useful, which directly led to the end of slavery and the liberation of women. When a spinning machine could be tended by one person, and perform the work of more than a hundred people, the abolition movements and liberation of women began.

What anthropologists have been able to determine is that the relatively few matrilineal "primitive" societies were that way due to women's relative economic contribution. About 70% of "primitive" societies were patrilineal, and they were always the most violent. When the Europeans invaded the east coast of North America, they encountered matrilineal societies, where women's contribution in horticultural civilizations was relatively high, and those civilizations were so attractive to the invaders that running off and "going native" was an epidemic problem for the Europeans. Women's status universally declined with the advent of urbanized civilization, as the physical strength of men became more valuable. With industrialization, strong backs were no longer so valuable, and the lives of women and enslaved people improved dramatically.

There were also losers in early industrialization, such as children, as child labor became common. But with industrialization, people could afford consciences, and the liberation of women, slaves, and children had a great deal of morality behind them, but that was entirely dependent on economics. That is why FE will be so radically transformative. Before industrialization, everybody "knew" that the world needed slaves, and that a woman's place was being barefoot and pregnant. When I see Westerner's decry the horrible way that women are treated in pre-industrial civilizations, I rarely see them understand that that treatment is determined by their economic situation, not "morality." Until people really understand that, they cannot begin to fathom the transformative effects of FE.

Cities will largely become obsolete, as will money and "exchange," as will any human exploitation, even under seemingly gentle taxation and wage slavery. Warfare will become obsolete, unless humanity is irredeemably stupid, but I have a higher opinion of human potential than that. Many unsavory aspects of modern civilization, which are considered human "nature," are just as energy dependent as the attitudes that saw women and slaves as "naturally" inferior beings. With FE, animals will no longer be used for food, as humanity attains higher levels of conscience. Making a healthy vegetarian diet will be child's play with FE, and humanity's collective conscience will rise high enough with true economic abundance that the exploitation of any life form for human benefit will be seen as barbaric. On this thread and other related ones at Avalon, you can see people making posts who really do not understand those ideas. My essay is intended for those who do the work to gain those understandings, but, again, they are going to be highly unusual people. As I have stated at Avalon and in my essay, in 1720, nobody in the world saw anything intrinsically "bad" about slavery, and the world's smartest man lost his life's fortune speculating in the slave trade:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton#Personal_life

Two hundred years later, such an attitude was unthinkably barbaric, and an institution that was hallowed and unchallenged for several millennia became seen as evil. Nobody in imperial Rome saw anything wrong with entertaining themselves by watching people being forced to murder each other. With extremely few exceptions, the invading Spanish saw nothing wrong with conquering entire peoples and enslaving them to produce gold, silver, sugar, and other meaningless "goods." The "father" of the USA, George Washington, saw nothing wrong at all with a genocidal swindling of Native Americans of their land:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#blueprint

and neither did anybody else in the American government of the time. For the next century, swindling the natives with phony treaties was as American as apple pie, until there were no more lands to steal. Even today, Washington's biographers cannot bring themselves to mention his greatest feat: constructing the plan to steal a continent.

When FE and abundance reign, those practices, and their justification/overlooking by the social managers, will be seen as relics of a barbaric age, just like all the evil rationales that were paraded to justify invading Iraq, where the easy energy is:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#invading

At least when Dick Cheney recently held forth about his "expertise" in Iraq, even his cheerleaders began to ridicule him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/megyn-kelly-dick-cheney-iraq-fox-news-2014-6

Maybe there is some hope for us, but, as always, our collective conscience has always been dependent on our economic situation. That kind of "conscience" is partly what Brian was referring to when he wondered if humanity is really a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

In that instance, those scientists and "visionaries" that Brian engaged were completely addicted to their scarcity-based framework, and violently denied that anything like FE was possible or desirable. They were really little different than antebellum southerners pointing to their Bibles to justify slavery.

I need people who can see past the "need" for slavery before the means to end it is delivered to their door. History has proven that such people are almost impossible to find, as nearly everybody trades their sentience for economic security, but the Internet allows me to hunt for them, which is what I intend to do.

Best,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th June 2014, 15:49
Hi: I will put up my revised medical essay either today or this weekend, as I am nearly finished with it. Yesterday, I made my first visit of the year to high mountain lake, pics attached. As with the other old essays I am editing, I could spend months rewriting those essays, but my revisions will have to be good enough for now. One in particular I feel like commenting on, and this new footnote gives a hint of it:

In 2014, I totaled up the USA's death statistics in 2010, and 69% of the 2.5 million deaths were due to degeneration of the arteries and organs, such as the lungs, brain, pancreas, liver, and kidneys, which are all primarily attributable to what people ingest, including smoke, alcohol, food high in sugar, fat, and protein, and various industrial chemicals, which is all also certainly related to the immune system failure called cancer, which all occurred in history's most obese and sedentary people.

Back to work,

Wade

Wade Frazier
20th June 2014, 19:43
Hi:

OK, that did not take too long:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm

The cover-up essay is getting it next. There will some significant revisions for that, but as with all of these big essays, I really would need months to do justice to the revisions for each essay, but tidying then up some, with some revisions to make them more current and aligning them with my upcoming big essay, will have to be enough for now.

I am probably most of the way done with the essay revisions, with the American Empire essay (and maybe my lies essay) the remaining big one, and I am not sure if I have the courage to tackle the war essay. We will see how that goes.

Best,

Wade

Melinda
20th June 2014, 20:21
"They have to start to think epochally"

This is really a problem and is likely related to the personal integrity issue. "If it does not affect it me in my life time, then... screw this! somebody else will mop up the mess and they will have better tech than I do now!"

Or: "why on Earth would I bother with this effort when I will likely be dead by the time there is a dent made? Better install my own solar panels and wind mills and let the others fend for themselves. Life is short and the path to Free Energy is too long and arduous... way too long..."

It's also interesting when you compare Brian O and and Dennis's work with other energy "visionaries"... it drives the point home! I hear nowadays all the time about solar panels. "Let's carpet the streets", they say, "we just need to raise the money to make this a viable solution!"

When you don't get excited by stuff like that you look like you're part of the "bag guys": "Don't you want alternative energy!? What's wrong with solar panels?! Hey buddy.. are you one of those fossil fuel guys? What do you meant too little too late!? It's proven tech!"

And Dennis Lee was actually giving away his energy systems. At one point you would pay only from the energy savings and later on you would just buy the information kit (and you could even ask your money back if you did not like it). The point being: Dennis was doing this at huge scale at zero risk for the customer and look what happened to him... and now we want to carpet the streets with solar panels.

It's funny (in a dark way), because from a certain level it looks like everything is fine, there is no suppression going on and there is a plethora of visionaries and technologies just waiting to be funded. If you hint that you may get into trouble and fast, if you put tech on the market in a disruptive way, they say you're crazy... nobody is suppressing this or that person? How come this or that can still speak and are alive and well?

And yet... few have heard of Brian O, Dennis Lee and Wade Frazier and even fewer took the time to dig the truth out. :) (when I've first heard of Dennis' heat pump, while it made sense, I quick filed him as a "quack" for having an arrest warrant issued on his name. Nobody goes to prison if they're really innocent, right?).

So yes, we need to start to think epochally. Then we will realize that solar panel and wind mills will just not do. And we will also see energy at the root of everything so it will be much easier to keep the eye on the ball.


Great post Ilie. I’m glad you commented. Thank you.

I’ve been looking at the renewables options lately, just to substantiate my understanding of why they really are not enough, and I did not have to do much digging to come across work on the web that explains it quite clearly.

I may share some links on your What Becomes Obsolete thread at some point, as the idea that they can be our benign saviour can not only become obsolete with FE, but even without FE it really is worth understanding the inadequacies of comparatively ‘benign’ renewables, if your heart is invested in healing both the environment and the future of younger generations.

I doubt anyone here needs convincing – but for others browsing, who haven’t been immersed in studying energy, it may be useful to post.


To Wade, thank you for everything you’ve been sharing lately. In a world struggling to understand itself, this thread is a haven.

We have everything we need to heal the wounds we’ve inflicted on our planet, and one another. It is both spiritual and technological. And the longer I have looked at it, the clearer that has become.


Much love to you all.