US Navy Drafting New UFO Report Guidelines, Admit Recent Advanced Craft Sightings

[jcking]

Earlier this evening in Politico, one of the political news sites most closely tied with DC, a new article appeared:

"U.S. Navy Drafting New Guidelines For Reporting UFOs"
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/23/us-navy-guidelines-reporting-ufos-1375290

which included this choice quote:

The previously unreported move is in response to a series of sightings of unknown, highly advanced aircraft intruding on Navy strike groups and other sensitive military formations and facilities, the service says.

"There have been a number of reports of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military-controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years," the Navy said in a statement in response to questions from POLITICO. "For safety and security concerns, the Navy and the [U.S. Air Force] takes these reports very seriously and investigates each and every report.

it was favorably reported as


a significant new step in creating a formal process to collect and analyze the unexplained sightings — and destigmatize them.

This release/admission/update was posted around 6pm and so far this evening has been followed up at

The Daily Beast
https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-navy-preparing-to-unveil-new-guidelines-for-reporting-ufos

RT
https://www.rt.com/usa/457374-ufo-navy-reporting-guidlines/

The Hill
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/navy/440345-navy-updating-protocol-for-reporting-ufos

Washington Examiner
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/navy-making-it-easier-for-personnel-to-report-and-study-ufo-sightings

The Mirror UK
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/navy-forced-create-new-protocols-14543954

What do you think of this, and why the timing? Politico reporting directly for the US Navy basically ensures follow-up by other mainstream news sites, this isn't the usual "let's dump this 'we told you so' UFO story in Newsweek". I appreciate them being somewhat candid, and I wonder if they are getting ahead of another story- or are trying to turn a page, of sorts (or both).

[aoibhghaire]

Although Luiz Elizondo and Christopher Mellon are involved with the To The Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences, which supports research into explaining the technical advances of these reported UAPs.

Interestingly enough, Mellon was the co founder with Leslie Kean of UFODATA.org. This was launched in 2015. Leslie Keane was selected to write the New York Times article that first highlighted the AATIP office. UFODATA.org seeks to create a systematic, rigorous science of UFO phenomena. A way forward in UFO science.

May be Mellon and the selection of Keane could be behind presenting another story as a sequence to the original 2017 one.

[Helvetic]

Although Luiz Elizondo and Christopher Mellon are involved with the To The Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences, which supports research into explaining the technical advances of these reported UAPs.

Interestingly enough, Mellon was the co founder with Leslie Kean of UFODATA.org. This was launched in 2015. Leslie Keane was selected to write the New York Times article that first highlighted the AATIP office. UFODATA.org seeks to create a systematic, rigorous science of UFO phenomena. A way forward in UFO science.

May be Mellon and the selection of Keane could be behind presenting another story as a sequence to the original 2017 one.

Thank you aoibhghaire, the website is: http://www.ufodata.net

[ExomatrixTV]

US Navy Admits UFOs are HERE


SRLWRu2Pz40

[Did You See Them]

Lets hope they can distinguish between "Ours" and "Theirs"

"US Navy granted a patent for a diamond shaped aircraft that has a "intertial mass reduction device"

The US Navy has been granted a patent for an advanced aircraft which resembles a flying saucer UFO. Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an ‘inertial mass reduction device’ to travel at ‘extreme speeds’. What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities. The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft using various techniques including the generation of gravity waves, which were first detected in 2016 after being produced when two black holes collided.

https://i1.wp.com/metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SEI_63126404.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=512%2C674&ssl=1

https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/18/us-navy-secretly-designed-super-fast-futuristic-aircraft-resembling-ufo-documents-reveal-9246755/?ito=cbshare


"intertial mass reduction device" ??? - love the way it's just dropped into the article as if it's nothing !!!!

‘It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime,’ the patent says.

[Mike Gorman]

I was just watching the post disclosure world video, I might have known someone on here was onto this, very interesting development, official and all that.

[Intranuclear]

The "new" guidelines seem to be in the context of UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena or threats) and not meant to be disclosure in any form. Basically aimed to maintain the "what happens in the Navy stays in the Navy".
Why would the Navy disclose any technology that can easily overwhelm it?
There clearly is no way anymore to hide behind stupid attempts to disregard the existence of the phenomenon by ridiculing those reporting, so they must do everything in their power to prevent other navies/powers from acquiring such technologies first.

Hopefully this will allow a more open scientific and public debate on the subject without the immediate fear of being ostracized.

[Sunny-side-up]

Nice :sun:

That Patent is quite some read and the other patents leading off that page.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en

Grab them while you can.

[Bob]

@Did You See Them and group - https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1b/f6/40/5712193f6a971f/US20170313446A1.pdf is the patent for the thing in the image. The amount of energy inside such a thing is staggering, and how they would get such an amount of energy is just as mysterious. There are typos in the document, which is a bit odd, and looking at the overall concept, it is as if one is generating a localized black hole, and creating a space-time warping "event horizon". If anyone can actually build something like that based on the Patent, that would be a feat to see.

Meaning Patents to qualify to be something other than Bogus, have to be able to be built by one skilled in the topic (who is skilled in anti-gravity engines out there that we could know?) The invention must be "new" - if these things are in the public domain already (so many have seen flying triangles) how can they be "new", and therefore how can such a patent application be granted?

Nature pointed out - https://www.nature.com/articles/438139a


The US patent office has granted a patent on a design for an antigravity device — breaking its own resolution to reject inventions that clearly defy the laws of physics.

This is not the first such patent to be granted, but it shows that patent examiners are being duped by false science, says physicist Robert Park, watchdog of junk science at the American Physical Society in Washington DC. Park tracks US patents on impossible inventions. “The patent office is in deep trouble,” he says.

“If something doesn't work, it is rejected,” insists Alan Cohan, an adviser at the patent office's Inventors Assistance Center in Alexandria, Virginia. And when something does slip through, he says, the consequences are not significant: “It doesn't cause any problems because the patent is useless.”

But Park argues that patenting devices that so blatantly go against scientific understanding could give them undeserved respectability, and undermine the patent office's reputation. “When a patent is awarded for an idea that doesn't work, the door is opened for sham.”


Balls up: US patent office falls for antigravity device that would allow perpetual-motion machines.

Patent 6,960,975 was granted on 1 November to Boris Volfson of Huntington, Indiana. It describes a space vehicle propelled by a superconducting shield, which alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity. The device builds on a claim by the Russian physicist Eugene Podkletnov that superconductors can shield the effects of gravity. NASA was at one stage investigating the idea, but it has become almost as notorious as cold fusion as an example of fringe science.

The black hole device sounds awfully lot like patent 6,960,975 described above. What is specifically worrisome, is how one is able to put so much energy in a confined space and not have the space in-between the inner and outer electrodes that encompass the device "short out".. Like when a lightning bolt travels MILES containing as much energy as the device in the "patent", how over a few feet is such a device able to keep the equivalent of a mile long lightning bolt NOT shorting out and the device not blowing itself to smithereens..

To me, it's bogus and one of the distractions and mis-directors.

[Intranuclear]

Here is a good article explaining why there can be so many bogus patents: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/these-experts-figured-out-why-so-many-bogus-patents-get-approved/

Not saying that these patents are bogus, and in fact some are directly granted to the Navy department, so there is probably some intent that either such devices are in productions or at least feasible and the Nav's attempt to prevent others taking credit.

[jcking]

There have been a flood of follow-up and copycat articles in mainstream media today, following the Politico exclusive yesterday evening.

At CNN, they reported the new Navy policy and added an archived three-minute video clip covering the tic-tac video and the AATIP disclosure:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/24/politics/us-navy-ufo-guidelines/index.html

At Vice, they connected the Navy story to the recent Irish Coast sightings last November, that were disclosed through the state-sponsored BBC:
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/43jv7d/the-us-navy-wants-pilots-to-report-ufo-sightings

At Fox News, they also connected the Navy story to the prior AATIP disclosure by the New York Times:
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/us-navy-drafting-new-guidelines-for-reporting-ufos

It's also been reported today at US News & World Report, CNET, and Gizmodo, among others.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-04-24/navy-drafting-new-guidelines-for-reporting-ufos

https://www.cnet.com/news/us-navy-working-on-new-rules-to-report-ufo-sightings-says-report/

https://gizmodo.com/the-u-s-navy-is-working-on-new-guidelines-on-how-to-re-1834260673

Gizmodo arguably did the most thoughtful piece, connecting the Navy news all the way back to the notorious/historic Project Blue Book, and also bringing in the AATIP news for a connection. Heck, they even quoted an interview from the Mufon Journal.

What's interesting in watching this develop (for me), is that in the rare case we've had a UFO story pop up in the recent past (in the MSM), the mainstream news sources will report the new news and typically not follow-up or connect it to prior stories. Here we certainly have a case where there is a concerted effort among the more established media to connect it to either the AATIP/Elizondo/TTSA/Tic-Tac news, the British govt's disclosure through the BBC (the multiple Irish Coast UAP sightings from November), or both.

[ExomatrixTV]

yq67i2Ha9tw

¤=[Post Update]=¤

F9gddjls1J8

¤=[Post Update]=¤

tDVm9Exal2U

[pluton]

The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

The initial decision, which called for retiring the "flying saucers," was to cease the activity in 2013 to conspicuously align it with the retirement age 66 years, in which the US folks are entitled to a full social security benefit. That means the UFO activity would last 66 years from 1947 (the Kenneth Arnold sighting) to 2013. But given the sorrowful performance of MUFON, it was difficult to design a special UFO manifestation, which would strongly imply the word END to the eathlings. So the date December 21, 2012 was chosen instead for obvious reason, and it was linked with the celestial spectacle over Chelyabinsk in that "retirement year" of 2013 .

There are still some folks around who get the kick out of UFO, and so they make sure that it continues in its mummified form.

[onawah]

Official statement from what ETs? Where is your proof? Any links to info about this alleged statement?
This kind of post is more suited to the members only subforum here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/forumdisplay.php?83-Channeled-and-Other-Controversial-Material
...as it helps keeps Avalon's public embarrassment to a minimum.



The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

The initial decision, which called for retiring the "flying saucers," was to cease the activity in 2013 to conspicuously align it with the retirement age 66 years, in which the US folks are entitled to a full social security benefit. That means the UFO activity would last 66 years from 1947 (the Kenneth Arnold sighting) to 2013. But given the sorrowful performance of MUFON, it was difficult to design a special UFO manifestation, which would strongly imply the word END to the eathlings. So the date December 21, 2012 was chosen instead for obvious reason, and it was linked with the celestial spectacle over Chelyabinsk in that "retirement year" of 2013 .

There are still some folks around who get the kick out of UFO, and so they make sure that it continues in its mummified form.

[Intranuclear]

Official statement from what ETs? Where is your proof? Any links to info about this alleged statement?
This kind of post is more suited to the members only subforum here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/forumdisplay.php?83-Channeled-and-Other-Controversial-Material
...as it helps keeps Avalon's public embarrassment to a minimum.



The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

The initial decision, which called for retiring the "flying saucers," was to cease the activity in 2013 to conspicuously align it with the retirement age 66 years, in which the US folks are entitled to a full social security benefit. That means the UFO activity would last 66 years from 1947 (the Kenneth Arnold sighting) to 2013. But given the sorrowful performance of MUFON, it was difficult to design a special UFO manifestation, which would strongly imply the word END to the eathlings. So the date December 21, 2012 was chosen instead for obvious reason, and it was linked with the celestial spectacle over Chelyabinsk in that "retirement year" of 2013 .

There are still some folks around who get the kick out of UFO, and so they make sure that it continues in its mummified form.

LOL...
I'm pretty sure that he is joking.

[onawah]

Well, hopefully, but we do get a lot of off the charts ridiculous nonsense on Avalon re ETs, UFOs, etc., especially from new members, and it does get embarrassing, so better safe than sorry.


Official statement from what ETs? Where is your proof? Any links to info about this alleged statement?
This kind of post is more suited to the members only subforum here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/forumdisplay.php?83-Channeled-and-Other-Controversial-Material
...as it helps keeps Avalon's public embarrassment to a minimum.



The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

The initial decision, which called for retiring the "flying saucers," was to cease the activity in 2013 to conspicuously align it with the retirement age 66 years, in which the US folks are entitled to a full social security benefit. That means the UFO activity would last 66 years from 1947 (the Kenneth Arnold sighting) to 2013. But given the sorrowful performance of MUFON, it was difficult to design a special UFO manifestation, which would strongly imply the word END to the eathlings. So the date December 21, 2012 was chosen instead for obvious reason, and it was linked with the celestial spectacle over Chelyabinsk in that "retirement year" of 2013 .

There are still some folks around who get the kick out of UFO, and so they make sure that it continues in its mummified form.

LOL...
I'm pretty sure that he is joking.

[ExomatrixTV]

Will the Air Force update UFO reporting guidelines? https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/local/will-the-air-force-update-ufo-reporting-guidelines/7FL5oYUrvHjIiMp7W99yHO/

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Why would the Navy disclose any technology that can easily overwhelm it?

I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes here.

We've had a secret space program for decades now, Corey Goode and all the other hoaxers notwithstanding. Joseph P. Farrell is an Oxford scholar, which makes me skeptical of his ultimate motives, but it also makes him very good at citing sources professionally, and he has very detailed presentations available on YouTube documenting the trail of evidence back to the WW2 era, as to who is really behind these "flying saucers."

Our military contractors, like Boeing or Lockheed Martin, and a few others, have had this kind of technology for decades, and with the new Space Force, it's all going to be forced out into the open for the first time. That's my take on what is going on right now. We might even get the full history on all of this stuff eventually, which I'm sure was integral to the real underlying motives during the Cold War. The US and USSR probably had at least one other power group to worry about, or even at least two of them, which were purely human.

One bit of irony I expect we will be seeing a lot of within the "alternative community," is that as we finally start getting the real kind of disclosure we've been demanding for so many years, many aren't going to believe that it's actually happening. There is certainly a lot of disinfo out there, and it seems to have done its job pretty well, as far as that goes.

When it finally does happen, there won't need to be any debate about it, because we'll start seeing the new energy technologies applied in civilian life. And people can see and touch it, and use it, for themselves.

I'd like to buy a big chunk of cheap land in Alaska and power greenhouses 365 days a year. Low energy costs will unlock miracles. :)

[pluton]

Official statement from what ETs? Where is your proof? Any links to info about this alleged statement?
This kind of post is more suited to the members only subforum here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/forumdisplay.php?83-Channeled-and-Other-Controversial-Material
...as it helps keeps Avalon's public embarrassment to a minimum.



The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

The initial decision, which called for retiring the "flying saucers," was to cease the activity in 2013 to conspicuously align it with the retirement age 66 years, in which the US folks are entitled to a full social security benefit. That means the UFO activity would last 66 years from 1947 (the Kenneth Arnold sighting) to 2013. But given the sorrowful performance of MUFON, it was difficult to design a special UFO manifestation, which would strongly imply the word END to the eathlings. So the date December 21, 2012 was chosen instead for obvious reason, and it was linked with the celestial spectacle over Chelyabinsk in that "retirement year" of 2013 .

There are still some folks around who get the kick out of UFO, and so they make sure that it continues in its mummified form.

I already post it somewhere. Let me look for it... Oh, here it is:

xQL9oIhn_rQ

The Pentagon folks are not completely UFO illiterate as MUFON is, and so they ended the program in 2012 being able to read the ET statement that there would be no more UFO displays, because the time of nearly sixty-six years was more than sufficient enough for the earthlings to learn the symbolic language the aliens speak with.

That Pentagon statement conflicts with the content of the Politico article, which wasn't independently confirmed by other news folks, which is something that is not actually required by the UFO clergy.

[Bill Ryan]

The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

Please cite the 'official statement'. That sounds important. THX. :thumbsup:

[pluton]

The official statement from the ETs said that all UFO displays were discontinued effective December 21. 2012.

Please cite the 'official statement'. That sounds important. THX. :thumbsup:

As you might have noticed, the UFO never lands so the occupants would line up in front of it to make an official statement. It was a series of encounters between the UFOs and the Navy, not available to public viewing, whose nature led the military brass to the conclusion that such encounters would end in 2012 not to be experienced again.

Strictly considered though, the UFO effects dedicated to the public viewing could have been excluded from the decision to quit the show, but the aliens found themselves precariously close to one of the famous quote (http://66.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4sakmwt5l1rvcjd7o1_500.jpg).

[Star Tsar]

Mr Greenwald Jnr on the matter...


Black Vault Radio

https://secureimg.stitcher.com/feedimageswide/480x270_205100.jpg

Episode 31 | US Navy UFO Reporting Guidelines

Published 29th April 2019

In episode #31 of The Black Vault Radio -- Recent statements by the U.S. Navy elude to new UFO reporting guidelines being implemented. Based on reports by military pilots in recent years, “unidentified aircraft” are causing security concern and aviation hazards that need to be addressed. Join me, as I connect the phrasing used by the Navy going back 66 years… And I’ll explore Air Force regulations already on the books that outline the very same thing. What does this all mean?

Show notes:

– U.S. Navy Drafting “UFO Reporting Guidelines” – But What Does That Mean? - https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/u-s-navy-drafting-ufo-reporting-guidelines-but-what-does-that-mean/

– "UFO Documents" from NCIS - Naval Criminal Investigative Service - https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/ufo-documents-ncis-naval-criminal-investigative-service/

– Updated "Statement" Regarding Navy Guidelines - https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/4-26-2019-7-53-08-AM.png

2Jo-24jtUqI

[ExomatrixTV]

Richard Dolan. The Navy & UAP: Controlled Disclosure Continues
xMughgCLWuc

[ExomatrixTV]

Alien Metal Alloys stored by US Government - May 6, 2019
fQjIc6_HOxE

[Maia Gabrial]

If the Navy is going to keep the information secret from us, why bother sharing anything with them? I know I wouldn't share anything with them....
I'm all for full disclosure about everything. And I think people will be able to handle the truth, so start opening up those files, Baby!

[Mike Gorman]

If the Navy is going to keep the information secret from us, why bother sharing anything with them? I know I wouldn't share anything with them....
I'm all for full disclosure about everything. And I think people will be able to handle the truth, so start opening up those files, Baby!

I suspect their disinclination to share information has nothing, whatsoever, to do with our ability to 'handle the truth' it is all about them holding on to their power.
Being in possession of new technologies, new metal alloys, all kinds of technical information is very useful for military literal-minded people. The philosophical aspects have never been the strong suit of the Pentagon, or the military mentality.
These are highly pragmatic, narrow people, they have zero interest in humanity progressing, this is the home of Deep State which seeks to dominate the world. Never forget this.

[Didgevillage]

Our military contractors, like Boeing or Lockheed Martin, and a few others, have had this kind of technology for decades, and with the new Space Force, it's all going to be forced out into the open for the first time. That's my take on what is going on right now. We might even get the full history on all of this stuff eventually, which I'm sure was integral to the real underlying motives during the Cold War. The US and USSR probably had at least one other power group to worry about, or even at least two of them, which were purely human.

The concept of space travel is akin to Navy ships sailing oceans, rather than Air Force which constantly requires ground support.

Back-engineers technologies have been available, first for Germans, and then the US and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union had its versions of Roswell crashes from which they could back-engineer stuff.




as we finally start getting the real kind of disclosure we've been demanding for so many years, many aren't going to believe that it's actually happening.


Some people will never believe anything, because they have been brainwashed and live in denial, no matter what happens.

[ExomatrixTV]

15-05-2019: UFOs, A One World Religion & One World Army - David Icke
NzvT3batgWs

[ExomatrixTV]

It is not just that the UAPs which military pilots are encountering are strange - no paint, rivets, wings, antenna, safety lights, transponders or exhaust - they sometimes are so fast and maneuverable that they defy our understanding of physics. For example, some of these vehicles appear to withstand forces of acceleration far greater than maximum design limits of any man-made aircraft. No wonder some military witnesses - often, pilots who are scientists or engineers themselves - actually lean towards the hypothesis that they are not from this world. Like all good scientists, these pilots recognize that our theories must adjust to facts and new information, however daunting, not the other way around.

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/444422-friend-foe-or-unknown-force-flying-overhead-congress-should-find

[ExomatrixTV]

UFO Invasions Will Force Disclosure
0q0XxfU7wSo

[ExomatrixTV]

Lets Talk About What The Pentagon Just Said About UFO's / UAP's 🛸

NSgmmtzfmfM

[rodguy911]

THe navy is in charge of some UFO investigations and has been for years since most of our stuff we have reengineered is above grourn and the ET's are all deep in the ocean or underground accd.
to D
r. Steven Greer who should know.

[ExomatrixTV]

New York Times BOMBSHELL: UFO Revelations Means World is Changing
_WV_G-A7t_0

[jcking]

And today yet another article, this time on the Opinion page of the Washington Post, straightforwardly titled “UFOs Exist and Everyone Needs to Adjust to That Fact”

Nope, I’m not pulling your leg.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/05/28/ufos-exist-everyone-needs-adjust-that-fact/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bb36c809ac59

(If you find yourself blocked by a Washington Post paywall, you could potentially try the link in an incognito browser. I'm not saying you should by any means, but it just might work)

Intriguingly, the Washington Post article was not written by an astronomer, a prominent UFOlogist, a forensics expert, a metamaterials guru, but:


Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University

In the article he points toward a somewhat wonky, yet prescient, academic paper published in a journal called Political Theory by Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall, which surmised that UFOs basically *needed* to be ignored by world governments , because they point toward the impotency of political/territorial sovereignty by being acknowledged. The argument of an advanced group that doesn’t acknowledge human rules over airspace and how dangerous that might be, etc etc.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0090591708317902

It cheekily states in a philosophically-imbued tone that

“The UFO can be “known” only by not asking what it is”

The WP article goes on to make a case that we not only need to accept that UFOs exist, but that we should actually start to think about whether there might be ETs running some of them.

Drezner concludes:
“What appears to be happening is that official organs of the state are now acknowledging that UFOs exist, even if they are not literally using the term. They are doing so because enough pilots are reporting UFOs and near-air collisions so as to warrant better record-keeping. They are not saying that these UFOs are extraterrestrials, but they are trying to destigmatize the reporting of a UFO.

Still, the very fact that this step has been taken somewhat weakens the Wendt and Duvall thesis. This was always a two-step process: (a) Acknowledge that UFOs exist; and (b) Consider that the UFOs might be ETs.

In recent years, the U.S. national security bureaucracy has met the first criterion. What happens to our understanding of the universe if great powers meet that second one?”

[aoibhghaire]

Today's Washington Post article by Daniel W. Drezner, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University cited and used the main political opinion from an academic paper published in a journal called Political Theory by Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall.

Alexander Wendt had already published two papers on the political aspects of the UFO problem:

2008 'Sovereignty and the UFO' (with Raymond Duvall), Political Theory, 36(4), 607-633

2010 'Militant Agnosticism and the UFO Taboo' (with Raymond Duvall), in Leslie Kean, ed., UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record, New York: Harmony Books, pp. 269-281.

Alexander Wendt is co founder with Christopher Mellon and Leslie Kean of UFODATA.ORG.

UFODATA seeks to create a systematic, rigorous science of UFO phenomena. Such a science is needed because of misplaced certainties on both sides of the UFO debate.

Christopher Mellon is also a co founder of TTSA.

[Star Tsar]

Here is the article

'Sovereignty and the UFO' (with Raymond Duvall)

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0090591708317902

[ExomatrixTV]

Luis Elizondo Admits US Government Has Alien Artifacts
yDRJWrDWr0o