The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe [Archive]

Delight

25th April 2019, 03:06

I admit it. I am anti-vax until they are more carefully researched. IF I am convinced vaccines are better than improving the terrain (the natural immunity to withstand external assault by foreign organisms), improving hygeine (including eliminating toxins in the environment) and that they are better than triggering a NATURAL immunity by contacting bacteria, viruses and other challenges: I will change my mind. This is MY considered opinion.

Epigenetics, information about the placebo and nocebo, knowledge of how the immune system functions and much else is new science. Also even with the paucity of studies, new information about the unintended consequences of vaccination is qualifying the conceptual framework the vaccine theory is based upon. However, the government bodies that make laws about vaccines and regulate the industry allow the industry to create more and more vaccines as if the science is settled.

That is a BIG LIE that many parrot: SETTLED SCIENCE. There are people who have synthesized readily available refutation and also have experienced the negative outcomes of the vaccine process. The provaccination stand is that anecdotal evidence does not count. This is evidenced by derision for "just mothers and fathers" who notice the drastic deterioration of children immediately after vaccination.

We all probably know now that the vaccine industry has no liability in the US for damages to injured recipients. The government vaccine injury program is the place for redress, and uses taxes collected from each vaccine to cover injured parties. However, after awarding 4 Billion dollars in injury awards since the late 80's, obviously something is askew. There is strong evidence that the awards were to only about 10% of those actually injured.

Yesterday in Oregon there was a significant citizen response to HB3063, a bill that eliminates religious and philosophical exemptions for vaccination by individuals and parents in the name of a public health emergency (which if researched is obviously NOT an emergency at all but an opportunity).

In several states, bills are appearing to eliminate religious and philosophical exemptions and even eliminate most medical exemptions (or take the ability to write medical exemptions from the hands of physicians and place it into the hands of the public health authority).

I admit it. I am outraged about mandatory vaccination under ANY circumstances. Mandatory vaccination is completely antithetical to Voluntary and informed acceptance. Others' choices are NOT my business. They must be made between individuals, parents and their MDs. I just wonder why more people are not outraged? Maybe they are, but feel it is useless to speak out? Maybe they believe we MUST be vaccinated, despite our choice, for the sake of the whole.

There is plenty of evidence that vaccines are not safe for many (and in fact are categorized as "unavoidably unsafe" due to the belief they are absolutely necessary for public health). In addition to the existential threat of being forced to accept what (for many) is an unacceptable injury, the insult added is that any unintended consequences are solely our own and our family's responsibility to bear.

There is very strong argument that the unvaccinated pose no threat to others (even if to themselves, which IMO is debatable also). Maybe they work in some way (although IMO as poor substitutes for natural immunity). However, there is plenty of evidence that vaccines are in fact not effective. The flu shot is one example that one can observe.

The MMR measles componenet that is in the news is not very effective (must be boosted again and again with no life long immunity), does not confer passive immunity to the breast fed child, and actually has been correlated with a loss of secondary benefits that the immune system acquires from having measles, mumps and rubella itself (such as resistance to cancers).

Vaccinated people shed live strains of the virus if the virus is live as in the MMR. People who have late onset of childhood diseases are MUCH sicker. The mumps component often only postpones the disease to a time when males may have lasting infertility due to orchitis (a mumps effect only for older boys and young men).

However, IMO we all should be outraged about FORCING vaccination, even we like them for ourselves.

IMO mandatory vaccination is a positioning move which places us ever closer to complete loss of our freedom to decide what happens to our own bodies.

What is really, really frightening to me is the lack of concern for a case in which a violation of civil rights is acceptable for a product that is dicey. It may be that this is one of the clearest examples of whole sale brain washing by propaganda. Part of the propaganda seems to trigger a fear reaction against all dissent by the skeptical. Or maybe it is just the cognitive dissonance of "OMG what if I participated in my child's condition by allowing the shots?"

Moreover, there is also a component of apathy about the unintended consequences that seem to correlate with the rise in vaccinations.... the sickest generation of humanity in modern times when over 50 percent of youth have a chronic condition requiring care and medication, curtailing of activity, special needs in education.....

IMO there is a plan to roll out mandatory vaccination for all adults for the same "reasons" proclaimed for children: Health. People seriously believe that vaccines are the way to ensure health when strong evidence also shows a correlation between increased vaccination rates aand collective DECLINE in health measures.

What I am trying to do with this thread is make my own statement that something is terribly wrong with the picture.

Even in alternative forums, poeple respond to critique as ones convinced already. They KNOW that vaccines have been proved safe and effective. People whom I would have thought tolerant of opposing views shout down dissent. They don't search out the kind of evidence I have discovered, yet want us to be quiet about what we have learned.

People are being officially silenced on facebook, youtube, and amazon. The way to share current information is being shut down. Withholding the means to have informed consent is telling.

IMO this is way more than even what is occurring specifically about vaccination. My opinion is that mandatory vaccination should be seen as a step towards 100% control by the corporatocracy of our personal right to determine what happens with our own bodies. I think it is totalitarian tiptoe made explicit.

I see legislatures around the country are passing IMO draconian laws (meaning the law does not fit the condition). I suspect it is dangerous and only the beginning.

At the same time, it IS about vaccines themselves because this is an invasive treatment. It violates the integrity of the body and introduces toxins (in the name of triggering a good outcome) into muscle. This was never where we were intended to naturally take in substances to create an immune response. That is orally and in the respiratory track.

Even if people disagree with me, thinking mine is just a crack pot view, where will it end if we cave here?

Yes, this has been my tipping point. Some have said this may call for revolution. I have never felt so sure that I would actually participate in a rebellion over any other issue.

OK so here goes my willingness to hear others but I ask all to please not just parrot the news but first read up on this subject. Maybe read this compendium of recent information and refute the information with better information.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N5ePF6XPR5LmLGTjiBMpD5JfFJAm6JYJ68OyV5GJySw/edit

In the future, I am going to post about information that refutes the "bi-partison line" of whole-ly owned politicians and health experts who are co-opted by a system of Corporate Medicocracy. (sounds like medic o crazy). I am willing to look at opposing views but I hope there will not just be one liners and I hope it will be backed by something meaningful to the writer. I look for others who might find new and helpful information to add.

Beginning with a very recent update regarding a whistleblower Zimmerman, vaccines and autism

1XUM2gvfbW8

and this well researched response by Del Bigtree of "Vaxxed" (banned by Amazon) to a recent tirade from vaccine apologist Peter Hotez MD. Hotez wails against the Massive "anti-vax lobby" and their many useful idiots.

3GAmHscgtEs

Both are IMO really important. They demonstrate the recent climate of PROPAGANDA, LIES and CRAVEN disregard for our right to informed consent. IMO this is NOT just about the shot in the arm, despite unquestionable individual (and MAYBE collective) harm. IMO it is a shot across the bow of the ship of individual sovereign rights. IMO but not alone in this opinion.

Delight

25th April 2019, 05:02

In case people who read this think it won't (eventually) effect YOUR choices:

Adult vaccination is already mandatory NOW. Not everyone encounters the demand, but healthcare workers (and other persons employed in these settings, even if not providers) must have a yearly flu vaccine to work.

In the case of an "Emergency" such as NYC, everyone is forced to comply or be fined (even jail was suggested for noncompliance). A lawsuit in the measles outbreak NYC case was filed 4/16/2019 seeking to halt an emergency order requiring vaccinations.

NewsNY measles 2019: Parents sue New York City Department of Health to halt vaccine mandate
David Robinson, Rockland/Westchester Journal (https://www.lohud.com/story/news/health/2019/04/16/measles-2019-parents-sue-new-york-city-halt-vaccine-mandate/3482690002/)

Those who have not received the vaccine or do not have evidence of immunity could be fined $1,000
The suit is brought by NYC-based attorney Robert Krakow, and Robert Kennedy Jr and Patricia Finn
The lawsuit contends the emergency orders override the parents and their children’s religious practices
The Brooklyn lawsuit is expected to hold a hearing on Thursday to discuss the case

Parents of New York City children who have not been vaccinated against measles have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt an emergency order requiring vaccinations.

The lawsuit stems from New York Mayor Bill de Blasio declaring a public health emergency for parts of Brooklyn's Williamsburg section following a measles outbreak, mostly affecting the Orthodox Jewish community.

Unvaccinated people living in designated ZIP codes who may have been exposed to measles will be required to receive the vaccine to protect others from the outbreak, USA TODAY Network reported.

Measles is highly contagious, but the vaccination is considered 97% effective, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rockland County Department of Health workers display posters during a measles (MMR) vaccination clinic at WIC Office in Haverstraw on Friday, April 5, 2019.Buy Photo
Rockland County Department of Health workers display posters during a measles (MMR) vaccination clinic at WIC Office in Haverstraw on Friday, April 5, 2019. (Photo: John Meore/The Journal News)

Members of the City’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene will check the vaccination records of people who may have been in contact with infected patients. Those who have not received the vaccine or do not have evidence of immunity may be given a violation and could be fined $1,000, the mayor said.

The lawsuit, filed in state Supreme Court in Kings County, accused the city of failing to use the least restrictive means to control measles yet balance the rights to individual autonomy, informed consent and free exercise of religion.

Further, the lawsuit noted city officials took "these dramatic steps without a blueprint for implementation, itself suggesting that a true public health emergency does not exist"

MEASLES: Rockland issues new exclusion order for public places

ROCKLAND: Judge upholds halt on Rockland emergency order on measles

VACCINE: What to know about checking your vaccine records, immunity

In addition, the lawsuit contends the emergency orders unnecessarily override the parents and their children’s religious practices and the children’s lawful exemptions from vaccination to attend school, which they have obtained in full compliance with public-health law.

Attorney Patricia Finn speaks outside the Rockland County Courthouse after a hearing on the Rockland County state of emergency because of measles April 4, 2019.Buy Photo
Attorney Patricia Finn speaks outside the Rockland County Courthouse after a hearing on the Rockland County state of emergency because of measles April 4, 2019. (Photo: Peter Carr/The Journal News)

Manhattan-based attorney Robert Krakow is representing the parents, who are identified in court documents by initials. Other attorneys for the parents include Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Patricia Finn.

Brooklyn's outbreak
The outbreak in Brooklyn began in October, but many of these new cases were confirmed in the past two months. The vast majority of cases are children under 18 – and most of these measles cases were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated people.

Health officials said they are concerned the 285 cases of measles in the city, largely in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn among the Orthodox Jewish community, has been aided by so-called measles parties to purposefully expose their children to the illness to build their immunity.

Krakow spoke to USA TODAY Network about the lawsuit.

"We still believe that the city is overreacting, and in doing so it's damaging my clients' religious rights unnecessarily because there are other ways they could deal with the outbreak of measles," he said.

"This has been going on for seven months and they could quarantine individuals if it was that urgent," he added.

Krakow described the potential that people would decide to vaccinate children under pressure from the government as un-American.

"That to me sounds like compelled or forced vaccination, which I think is not necessary here and in that context goes against the basic principals of democratic society and the constitution," he said.

New York City Department of Health didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit comes as a similar case of parents suing government officials for overreacting to a measles outbreak unfolds in Rockland County.

A judge recently upheld a temporary order that halts Rockland from barring children who are unvaccinated against measles from schools, places of worship and other public places.

Rockland County Executive Ed Day instituted the emergency declaration on March 26 that barred from public places people under age 18 who lack the vaccinations. But an April 5 court decision said 166 cases cited by the county since the measles outbreak began last October did not rise to an epidemic or constitute a disaster.

The Brooklyn lawsuit is expected to hold a hearing on Thursday to discuss the case, Krakow said, and a four-judge panel is expected to take up the Rockland case at some point this week.

Potential overlap
Krakow said there is a potential for future overlap between the Brooklyn and Rockland measles cases in the appellate court .

"It does seem that the overarching part is of the government overreacting that does not address the public health concern," he said.

Yet the key difference is that Rockland's order sought to ban unvaccinated children from some public places, as opposed to the vaccine requirement under New York City's emergency declaration.

Krakow described the order that people shall vaccinate as extreme in light of the circumstances.

"There have been no deaths, there have been some hospitalizations and I’m not minimizing it," he said. "Measles is a concern, but it seems to be overblown."

The World Health Organization described the disease as a prominent cause of death among young children, despite the availability of an effective vaccine. More than 110,000 people, mostly children, died of measles worldwide in 2017.

The last U.S. measles death on record was in 2015.

Another 90 measles cases were reported across the nation last week, the biggest jump this year as the annual total continued its march toward record levels, federal health officials reported.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said 555 cases have been confirmed in 20 states in 2019, the second-highest total since measles was declared eliminated in the U.S. almost two decades ago.

Still, the Brooklyn lawsuit noted the city's measles emergency declaration orders are arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, exceed their lawful authority and should be vacated.

The lawsuit is seeking a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and a declaratory judgment vacating the orders.

In states like California many more people are affected

GOVERNOR SIGNS FIRST ADULT VACCINE MANDATE FOR PRESCHOOL TEACHERS AND PARENT VOLUNTEERS
VACCINE MANDATES FOR ADULTS WHO WORK OR VOLUNTEER IN DAY CARE, PRESCHOOL AND LICENSED FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES WAS PASSED IN 2015 AND BECAME EFFECTIVE IN SEPTEMBER 2016.
SB-792 DAY CARE FACILITIES: IMMUNIZATIONS: EXEMPTIONS. HTTP://OW.LY/ZYUNA

SB 792 requires adult vaccination for Measles, Pertussis and the Flu. There is a personal belief exemption (PBE) for the Flu vaccine. Proof of vaccination (childhood records) or titer test showing antibodies to measles and/or pertussis will eliminate requirements for more vaccines. Medical exemptions are allowed for all mandated vaccines.

It is critical for adults to know that Measles and Pertussis vaccines are only administered in combination vaccines. There is not a “single antigen” vaccine for measles or pertussis licensed in the US.

Technically it is not possible to comply with this overreaching and very poorly written law that added parent volunteers in the eleventh hour amendment. An adult would actually receive up to “seven” antigens; measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), and pertussis (DTaP, Tdap) which contains antigens for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough), plus the current flu vaccine which can contain numerous strains of flu.

Most adults who have received a Tetanus shot have also been vaccinated for pertussis, although, it’s doubtful that they know it because this information is not widely known by the general public. Many tetanus vaccine providers do not give full disclosure including the vaccine manufacture package insert and the specific lot number for vaccines they administer. It’s important for adults to keep copies of vaccination records if they have received a tetanus shot during urgent or emergency medical treatment.

If adults submit to vaccination mandates for measles or pertussis in order to work they should request up to 6 (six) weeks paid leave of absence during the period of time that they are contagious due to live virus vaccine shedding and asymptomatic transmission. These warnings are clearly stated on the vaccine manufacturer's package inserts. (linked below)

The justification lawmakers used for passing SB 792 was based on the perceived health benefit for young children. In reality, placing young children in the care of recently vaccinated adults (or other children) increases their risk of contracting the very illness they're supposedly being protected from due to vaccine viral shedding and asymptomatic transition.

EXEMPTIONS
Personal Belief Exemptions (PBE) are allowed for the flu vaccine. Childhood vaccination records or titer tests proving immunity for measles and/or pertussis eliminate the requirement to be vaccinated in order to work and earn a livelihood. Medical Exemptions are allowed for all mandated vaccines.

GOVERNOR SIGNS FIRST ADULT VACCINE MANDATE FOR PRESCHOOL TEACHERS AND PARENT VOLUNTEERS
VACCINE MANDATES FOR ADULTS WHO WORK OR VOLUNTEER IN DAY CARE, PRESCHOOL AND LICENSED FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES WAS PASSED IN 2015 AND BECAME EFFECTIVE IN SEPTEMBER 2016. (https://parentsrightscalifornia.weebly.com/ca-sb-792-forced-adult-vaccines.html)

Many more vaccines are strongly suggested and proffer many opportunities for the vaccine industry

2018 Vaccination Schedule: Adults (https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/clinical-charts/2018-vaccination-schedule-adults/)

Adults Targeted as Federal Government Prepares to Track the Unvaccinated Posted: 3/18/2015 (https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/march-2015/adults-targeted-for-vaccine-compliance-by-feds.aspx)

National Adult Immunization Plan

Executive Summary
Vaccination is considered one of the most important public health achievements of the
20th century and continues to offer great promise in the 21st century. Vaccines save
lives and improve the quality of life by preventing serious infectious diseases and their
consequences. However, the benefits of vaccination are not realized equally across the
U.S. population. Adult vaccination rates remain low in the United States, and significant
racial and ethnic disparities also exist.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Vaccine Plan (NVP),
released in 2010, is a road map for vaccines and immunization programs for the
decade 2010–2020. While the NVP provides a vision for improving protection from
vaccine-preventable diseases across the lifespan, vaccination coverage levels among
adults are not on track to meet Healthy People 2020 targets. The National Vaccine
Advisory Committee and numerous stakeholder groups have emphasized the need for
focused attention on adult vaccines and vaccination.1 The National Adult Immunization
Plan (NAIP) outlined here results from the recognition that progress has been slow and
that there is a need for a national adult immunization strategic plan.
As a national plan, the NAIP will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders
to achieve its full vision. The plan emphasizes collaboration and prioritization of efforts
that will have the greatest impact. The NAIP also aims to leverage the unique
opportunity presented by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.
The NAIP is intended to facilitate coordinated action by federal and nonfederal partners
to protect public health and achieve optimal prevention of infectious diseases and their
consequences through vaccination of adults. The NAIP includes indicators to draw
attention to and track progress against core goals. These indicators will measure
progress against set standards and inform future implementation and quality
improvement efforts. The plan establishes four key goals, each of which is supported
by objectives and strategies to guide implementation through 2020:
Goal 1: Strengthen the adult immunization infrastructure
Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines
Goal 3: Increase community demand for adult immunizations
Goal 4: Foster innovation in adult vaccine development and vaccination-related
technologies THE NATIONAL VACCINE PROGRAM OFFICE
NATIONAL ADULT IMMUNIZATION PLAN (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo/national-adult-immunization-plan/naip.pdf)

Nasu

25th April 2019, 19:10

Matt P

25th April 2019, 19:13

Delight, your first comment was brilliant. Bravo!
My nurse practitioner wife and I have studied vaccines a long time. Any reasonable person who genuinely does so ultimately comes to realize the truth that there is absolutely NO evidence on the pro vaccine side. Not one double blind inert placebo study has ever been done on any vaccine. Not one vaccinated vs unvaccinated study has ever been done on any vaccine. Not one long term study has ever been done on any vaccine.
EVERY vaccine ever introduced was done so AFTER the disease which it was meant to combat was already almost gone anyway, meaning no vaccine has ever eliminated a disease.
The measles vaccine (MMR) is the perfect example of the craziness of vaccination. In the last twenty years only a handful of people have died from measles yet hundreds have died frim the vaccine.

We know the dozens of toxins in vaccines (mercury, aluminum, etc) and how deadly they are to the human body and I could go on about that for hours in another thread.

The bottom line is this, and no doctor in the world can refute this truth: vaccines are bioweapons with two main purposes. One, to make money, both in the short term sale of the vaccines and in the long term by, 2, creating disease. You read that right. Vaccines are designed to make people sick.

Matt

Edit for Nasu: herd immunity has been proven an impossible lie. Also, the science is settled because no real science exists in support of vaccine safety or effectiveness and hundreds of published papers proving harm.

Delight

25th April 2019, 23:20

As a father, it is one of my jobs to protect my children. Qui Bonno, who gains by continuing the party line that vaccinations are great for everyone and that one vaccine fits all? Clearly the pharmaceutical industry stands to gain the most, closely followed by the governments who tax them.
....................
As for forced vaccines or you can't work or go to school, I say no, I say rebel, there's more of us than us than them...x.....

I agree with you and know we are becoming aware but what do we do?

In this interview, Jon Rappaport

Jon has hosted, produced, and written radio programs and segments in Los Angeles and Las Vegas (KPFK, KLAV). He has appeared as a guest on over 200 radio and television programs, including ABC’s Nightline, Tony Brown’s Journal (PBS), and Hard Copy.

In 1994, Jon ran for a seat in the US Congress from the 29th district in Los Angeles. After six months of campaigning, on a very small budget, he garnered 20 percent of the vote running against an incumbent who had occupied his seat for 20 years.

In 1996, Jon started The Great Boycott, against eight corporate chemical giants: Monsanto, Dow, Du Pont, Bayer, Hoechst, Rhone-Poulenc, Imperial Chemical Industries, and Ciba-Geigy. The Boycott continues to operate today.

Jon has lectured extensively all over the US on the question: Who runs the world and what can we do about it?

Since 2000, Jon has operated largely away from the mainstream because, as he puts it, “My research was not friendly to the conventional media.”

Over the last 30 years, Jon’s independent research has encompassed such areas as: deep politics, conspiracies, alternative health, the potential of the human imagination, mind control, the medical cartel, symbology, and solutions to the takeover of the planet by hidden elites.

He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power.

A painter, Jon’s work has been shown in galleries in Los Angeles and New York. His poetry has been published by The Massachusetts Review.

He is a graduate of Amherst College (BA, Philosophy), and lives with his wife, Laura, in San Diego.http://www.tlbtv.com/tlbtv-epi-vaccines-draining-our-health-wealth/

describes an agenda that is actually about "Empire" and natural resources and as much as I hate to think about it.... intentional depopulation. I respect Jon Rappaport and it is TERRIBLE to hear this dispassionate lay out of the collusion of corporations and government. This matter is so frightening and so UNBELIEVABLE yet one must question WHY would our own governments act to chemically poison the population?

jP2nQzRYop4

I know PA has many good resources that are examining chemtrails, glyphosates and other threats. One of the hard facts is that glyphosates have infiltrated almost all our food sources.

The reason I have pinpointed vaccines and mandates forcing them is because it is so clearly "in our face" that those we have selected to protect our interests now are (maybe unknowingly) destroying us. Health is the interest we have in OUR bodies, OUR CHILDRENS bodies and our FUTURE ....generations and generations of the future.

I am not paranoid but I am FURIOUS and can only surmise that the worst possible agenda is in FACT the truth.

Delight

25th April 2019, 23:50

Delight, your first comment was brilliant. Bravo!
My nurse practitioner wife and I have studied vaccines a long time. .............

.......The bottom line is this, and no doctor in the world can refute this truth: vaccines are bioweapons with two main purposes. One, to make money, both in the short term sale of the vaccines and in the long term by, 2, creating disease. You read that right. Vaccines are designed to make people sick.
Matt

Thanks Maatt!

I am so sad that this is what I think also. It seems to me that we ALL should gather together ( no matter what POVs on other issues) and challenge this corporatocracy FOR DEAR LIFE or ? What will happen to us?

I think that one way to eviscerate our power is to demonize those who speak loudly and who may say things that range way outside the conventional mind set. David Icke has been right on many of his views. I cannot help but think that he is a REAL threat to societies like Australia (where mandatory vaccination has already been achieved). That is why he was blocked form entering the country to speak.

zLFsrkAQRKI

Delight

26th April 2019, 00:07

I feel so heartened by listening to people rally and I feel good about people Like Del Bigtree who is congenial, always respectful, intelligent and relevant. I contribute $10.00 per month to The Informed Consent Action Network (https://icandecide.org/)

ucjucHL5Fjg

onawah

26th April 2019, 00:12

onawah

26th April 2019, 00:57

Small, but heartening steps:
Sweden bans mandatory vaccines to help stop autism.
Anti-vaccine lawsuit won in Japan.
(This man, Paul Kangas, says he intends to run for POTUS on an anti-vaccine platform. Hopefully that will help prompt Trump to follow through with what seemed for awhile to be a promising anti-vaccine commitment. However, he failed to entitle his youtube video "Sweden Bans MANDATORY vaccines" which is a big discrepancy, and not very encouraging....:tsk: Let's hope he does better forthwith...)
update:Unfortunately, he got it even more wrong. See Delight's post:http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106821-The-US-Vaccine-issue-is-more-than-just-about-the-Shots-it-is-about-totalitarian-tiptoe&p=1288522&viewfull=1#post1288522

paul8kangas
Published on Mar 28, 2019
'‪Prevent autism. Stop vaccines. The most oppressed group in America are moms of autistic kids, Black & white. They care for a child who must have their diaper changed at age 39. Who can never grow up. See “Vaxxed” "
0sBSK0DHbHk

frankstien

26th April 2019, 01:02

Delight

26th April 2019, 01:22

Small, but heartening steps:
Sweden bans mandatory vaccines to help stop autism.
Anti-vaccine lawsuit won in Japan.
(This man, Paul Kangas, says he intends to run for POTUS on an anti-vaccine platform. Hopefully that will help prompt Trump to follow through with what seemed for awhile to be a promising anti-vaccine commitment. However, he failed to entitle his youtube video "Sweden Bans MANDATORY vaccines" which is a big discrepancy, and not very encouraging....:tsk: Let's hope he does better forthwith...)

paul8kangas
Published on Mar 28, 2019
'‪Prevent autism. Stop vaccines. The most oppressed group in America are moms of autistic kids, Black & white. They care for a child who must have their diaper changed at age 39. Who can never grow up. See “Vaxxed” "
0sBSK0DHbHk

This clarifies the above

STEcoFhs0z0

Delight

26th April 2019, 01:57

This organization has a great free newsletter you can subscribe too that gives you the latest lowdown on the Vaccine Nazis. They also educate on the history of vaccines, why they are not effective and actually interfere with the body's natural immune system.

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/

Thanks so much.

I found this on the site

Citizens Address the Toronto Board of Health on Vaccines
APRIL 11, 2019 BY VACCINE CHOICE CANADA

On April 8, 2019, the The Toronto Board of Health had an Agenda Item “Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy“.

Transcript of Joel Sussmann’s presentation to the Toronto Board of Health

Are you aware that from 2004 – 2014 ZERO people in the US died from contracting measles, according to the CDC? During this same time, 108 people died from the MMR vaccine, according to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.

Are you aware that a 2011 study conducted by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute found that 1 in 168 babies had emergency room visits within 4-12 days after their 12 month MMR vaccination and that several children died during the study? The number of deaths was not disclosed. One in 168 is a lot higher than the one in a million vaccine injury risk that parents are told about, isn’t it?

Are you aware the CDC holds 50 patents on vaccines and sells US $5 billion a year worth of vaccines?

Are you aware that Merck’s package insert on the MMR vaccine lists DEATH as only 1 of dozens of possible side effects? Have any of you read a vaccine insert?

Are you aware that the US Congress has ruled vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”?

Are you aware that vaccine safety studies are almost always conducted by vaccine manufacturers, and that NONE OF THE VACCINES ON THE CHILDHOOD SCHEDULE WERE TESTED AGAINST A TRUE INERT PLACEBO? They were tested against an older vaccine or adjuvant such as aluminum.

Are you aware that Pharmaceutical drugs under the FDA are safety tested for an average of 4.5 years prior to licensing? Vaccines are tested (on average) for 4.5 DAYS prior to licensing! 4.5 days vs. 4.5 years.

Are you aware that a Harvard Pilgrim Hospital study, funded by Health & Human Services in the US, revealed that less than 1%
of vaccine injuries are reported? This means that more than 99% of vaccine adverse reactions are not reported or acknowledged.

Are you aware that the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out more that US $4 billion due to vaccine injury and death? Are you aware that Canada is the only G7 nation without a vaccine injury compensation program?

The CDC uses Institute of Medicine reports to support their claim that Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism. IOM’s 2011 Report on Autism concludes, “The evidence is INADEQUATE TO ACCEPT OR REJECT a casual relationship between diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, or acellular pertussis-containing vaccine and autism.”

Institute of Medicine’s 2011 safety report reviewed Varicella, Tetanus, Hepatitis-B & MMR vaccines. 155 health conditions were studied. In 134 cases the literature was INADEQUATE TO ACCEPT OR REJECT CAUSATION.

Does this sound like the science is settled to you?

If you are not aware of these facts, then you have no business imposing this poorly tested medical procedure on Ontario’s children.

And if you are aware, then you are participating in medical and scientific fraud.

The vast majority of parents of vaccine injured or killed children now know the truth.They know the science is inadequate to support claims that vaccines are safe. (see paragraph above). You will not silence these parents through censorship, shaming, mandates and manipulation.

Until Health Canada authorizes an independent long term study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated, you are wasting everyone’s time.

No amount of pressure from Health Canada, Public Health, the Toronto Board of Health or the corporate controlled media will ever convince us otherwise. Our trust has been broken.

In a 2018 Globe & Mail opinion piece, Neil Rau & Richard Schabas said this, “The borderline hysteria, fuelled by the media and public health that greets a few cases of measles is unwarranted.”

Mr. Rau is a respected immunologist on the staff of University of Toronto. Dr. Schabas recently held the post of Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario.

Perhaps you should listen to one of your own.

Congress was blackmailed into drafting the NCVIA in 1986, does everyone know what that is? Just in case. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Vaccine manufacturers were losing multiple big money lawsuits surrounding injury and death from their products. They demanded Congress pass a law to give them legal immunity. In doing so, Congress said you must do safety studies annually and you must report to Congress every two years. In a 2018 lawsuit, it was proven that HHS did neither of those things – no studies and no reports to Congress for 30 years.

Your “science is settled,” one size fits all agenda intended to lead all citizens down the path of compulsory vaccination is in direct violation of the Ontario Health Care Consent Act, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, the Nuremberg Code, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution as supported by a Health Canada Statement.

This is Canada. It is not Salem, Massachusetts 1692.
It is not Berlin 1939. THIS WILL NOT STAND!!! Thank you for your time.

Delight

26th April 2019, 02:15

Sadly, I am quite sure you are right on track with this thread.
I think vaccines, 5G, chemtrails, glysophate, etc. are all depopulation programs.
It's a terrifying prospect, but unless we face it, no measures we might take to stop it will be likely to be enough to succeed.
Small inroads are being made in protesting and exposing the truth, but it IS happening, and that's what counts, so we must take courage and keep on keeping on.

I HATE that I am beginning to think depopulation programs are real. You said "unless we face it, no measures we might take to stop it will be likely to be enough to succeed".

There may NOT be a conscious agenda? But actually does it matter if it conscious, if it is accomplishing depopulation?

Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s.

The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more.

Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true?

Suzanne Humphries, MD, will detail facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, board certified internist and nephrologist Dr. Humphries will show that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases.

This presentation will bring to your mind the question "If the medical profession could systemically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, what else is ignored and misinterpreted today??"

DkNmMHyWGNg

Matt P

26th April 2019, 02:21

onawah

26th April 2019, 03:28

Delight

26th April 2019, 03:30

Humm...This Patriot and nurse said "We do not have the right to live in a disease free world". Do people think we have this right? Is this part of the propaganda?

uuIN_-PQbzM

Delight

26th April 2019, 03:39

Not sure I understand your comment, but I'd say it does appear there IS a conscious agenda on the part of the minority elite, but that they are being heavily influenced and/or controlled by beings (other-dimensional as well as ET) who want control of the planet, and of the population. So I suppose it depends on what your definition of "conscious" is.
\

There may NOT be a conscious agenda? But actually does it matter if it conscious, if it is accomplishing depopulation?

This idea about the interdimensional beings and all could be true and who knows (I don't)
What I meant is the thought that there is a room full of plotters who are actively seeking to murder us all is HORRIFIC to feel. It is the worst gut punch to accept that whole large scale intentions to destroy humanity exists. The thought is almost incomprehensible unless looked at distantly and with the detachment of it being like a movie. How do we really FEEL that without a head explosion?

I guess I hope that all the politicians taking money have no clue as to how bad this all is now for all of us? I hope that what looks to be a total medical cabal is not because they wish me dead.

However, I was thinking that I don't need to "go there" to thinking of the why (like interdimensional beiongs taking over) because it still needs all of us to stand up and refuse and band together and DEMAND a world that works for living beings. The petty infighting that we are seeing now, which is futile, is beyond moving chairs around on the sinking ship deck.

The whole of us SHOULD feel a NO at being forced to give up our rights. That is my focus. I really do feel we have power when we take it. That is why I think persuasion and coercion is used because we MUST AGREE at some level. This is like saying... I know what is true and will not listen to any of the liars even if interdimensional.

The video I posted by Suzanne Humphries shows that what we are looking at with vaccination started well before the 1900's. It is quite revelatory. Maybe all along there has been a room full of plotters? I know there have been genocides and yet this is hard to think about.

My emotional state about this issue is strong anger wanting to DO SOMETHING because I care that I see young parenst around me always talking about their sick and challenged kids. They work and are at the low end of resources and cannot refuse because they are caught in the bind of the system.

If nothing else, I want to say something. Maybe others will come forward and we can act together in some way?

Here is more evidence from Suzanne Humphries, MD Honesty vs. Policy.
cLrqmvjrIjI

onawah

27th April 2019, 00:40

Colorado HB 1312 “Debate” – First Hand Report
(One more horror story :( Not that the posters on this thread need another one, but for those who don't yet realize the awful truth, and would rather know the worst rather than remain in the dark, not just about vaccines, but to what low the Democratic Party has sunk. )
POSTED BY: SHERRI TENPENNY, D.O.
04/23/2019
by Dr. Shelley O’Neill, MD, April 16, 2019
https://vaxxter.com/colorado-hb-1312-debate-first-hand-report/
https://i2.wp.com/vaxxter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Testifying-at-Transportation-Hearing.jpg?resize=777%2C437&ssl=1
"This was my first time attending a legislative committee hearing and boy did I pick a doozy. The bill being heard was Colorado HB 1312, which essentially plans to treat vaccine injured families who want to decline even one shot, as ignorant criminals who need to be entered into a registry and tracked, forced into in-person meetings with state bureaucrats to be “educated” and forced into compelled speech by signing a form stating they are harming their child. People who decline one or more of the 72 required doses, would have their private medical information revealed to the state but those who accept all 72 doses get to keep their medical information private. It also wipes out 99% of medical exemptions, replacing the doctor’s authority for the state’s. It doubles the number of required vaccines and also applies to homeschooled children. This bill is a big stinking pile of garbage.

The Stage is Set
The hearing room was small, holding about a hundred seats. One thousand parents showed up in opposition, packing the halls, rooms, and walkways, with kids in tow, many disabled and vaccine injured. They were there hours ahead of time to stand in line for a seat in the hearing room. Hundreds of parents signed up to testify. The establishment made sure the people (the peasants?) knew their place, as most of the chairs were tied off and reserved for lobbyists, vaccine researchers, and medical-types. The elites also had their parking and food provided. They showed up late, waltzed in right past the lines of defiant families and left after giving their testimony. Only about 20 parents were initially allowed in the hearing room. The rest were ushered to different parts of the building and gathered in groups around their phones to listen to the proceedings. The Chairperson announced that she would call panels of four, each person would get two minutes to speak, followed by ten minutes of questions and discussion. I calculated that using this format would be 42 hours of testimony just for the opposition. Clearly, many of us would not be heard today.

As the hours dragged on, people had to leave to attend to their kids or work the next day. I stayed until the bitter end. I was finally moved into the hearing room around 7 pm, with testimonies lasting until 3:30 am. There were about 30 testimonials in favor of the bill. The proponents said the same old bumper sticker slogans, “safe and effective”, “one in a million”, “vaccines don’t cause [blah, blah, blah]…” The words “pseudoscience” and “conspiracy theories” were used more than once while ignoring all the injured families around them.

There were a few non-establishment people that spoke in favor of the bill. One was a family who told a heartbreaking story of losing a child to bacterial meningitis, the other an older man who was a polio survivor and the third was a mother whose child had a kidney condition and “could not receive the MMR,” so felt it was important that everyone else get it to protect her.

I choked up listening to the family describe losing their child to meningitis and wished that had not happened. But I also knew that vaccinating millions with our current meningitis vaccine would not be the answer. I wondered if they knew that meningococcal meningitis is very rare, with an average of 400 cases per year in a population of 325 million and that with treatment, the survival rate is 90%. I wondered if they knew that the vaccine for meningitis only gives temporary protection and if given to a million Colorado children, 10,000 of them would suffer severe injury and at least 30 would die?

I wondered if the polio survivor knew that back when he had paralytic polio (which only happens 1% of the time), the treatments of immobilization and casting ensured a permanent paralysis and we now know that proper physical therapy would have helped many of those children completely recover? I wondered if he knew that this bill doesn’t affect the polio vaccine but rather adds dozens of doses of newer, controversial, unsafe, unneeded and ineffective vaccines to the already bloated schedule?

The third case was particularly ironic because the bill does not recognize her daughter’s condition as one that would qualify for a medical exemption. If it passes, the medical exemption that she has enjoyed would vanish, so she was essentially testifying against herself and her daughter’s interests. Even more ironic, the people she was implying were a threat to her were actually defending her daughter’s right to obtain a medical exemption based on her doctor’s judgment and defending her medical privacy.

Besides the few cases above, all the other testimonies in favor of the bill were from the medical establishment—pharmacists, nurses, pediatricians, infectious disease doctors, public health officers, and pharma-funded researchers and scientists.

Those Against the Bill: The Opposition’s Turn
Approximately 150 spoke in opposition to the bill. There were four chiropractors, one acupuncturist, two “Vaccine Risk Aware” MD’s (including me), a representative from NVIC, and Del Bigtree. The rest were vaccine injured families, although many of the parents were also highly educated professionals, including nurses, nurse practitioners, PhDs, etc. The testimonies of vaccine injury were powerful and heartbreaking. Even more heartbreaking were the stories of grief, devastation, seizures, regression, disability, and death that did not touch the seven Democratic legislators’ stone-cold hearts. They were silent, dismissive or combative. A few of them dozed off during the testimonies. Much of the time, they appeared distracted by whatever was on their phone or laptop. The bill’s main sponsor would frequently come and go from the hearing room, missing much of the testimony, instead choosing to congregate with lobbyists in the hall. The four Republican legislators were attentive, listening and clearly touched by the stories. They asked excellent questions of both sides.

The contrast between the two parties was stark and noticeable to all. There were three exchanges with the Democratic legislators that took my breath away.

The first was from a pediatrician/representative who assailed a vaccine injured mother for speaking about MTHFR mutation. She implied that the mom “must be confused or lying” because she knew, and stated unequivocally, “that anyone who had double MTHFR mutation would have homocystinuria, which is screened for at birth!” The pediatrician/representative was very confident in her ignorance and could not be swayed. I so wished I had been up there to defend this mom and to let the other legislators know that pediatricians and allopaths do not study, utilize or understand epigenetics, detoxification or vaccine injury related to those factors and that their colleague was gravely misinformed. I personally have homozygous MTHFR mutation – and so did many others in the room – and I can assure you that I don’t have the diagnosis of homocystinuria.

For those who are curious, homocystinuria is an amino acid disorder that can be caused by many genetic polymorphisms, most commonly the CBS mutation. These newborns are screened for this disorder by measuring levels of amino acids and do not receive a genetic snp testing. So children having the MTHFR mutation, which may predispose them to vaccine injury, would not know that before injections started.

MTHFR and other single nucleotide polymorphisms. They are not genetic mutations like Down’s syndrome where everyone with that gene manifests with the same unalterable condition. These SNPs can turn on and off based on environmental factors and have many different manifestations, such as early heart disease, autoimmune disorders, and intolerance to medications. Most pediatricians know very little about this, and thus the hostile arrogance she demonstrated while shutting this informed mother down was shocking and quite symbolic of our bigger problems.

The second exchange was between an African-American legislator who seemed not to care at all when presented with information that the CDC had committed scientific fraud around a study looking at autism in African-American boys. Her very polite answer was, “My nephew is high up in the CDC so I have all the information I need from him, but thanks anyway”. Wow.

The third comment was heartfelt and by a legislator who has a grandchild with autism. She stated that the child was different even before his 2-month shots and she knew that his autism was “just how he was and not a vaccine injury”. I wondered if she knew four vaccines are now given during pregnancy, that the hepatitis B vaccine is given a few hours after birth and that the Hepatitis B vaccine given at birth has a higher correlation to autism than tobacco does to lung cancer?

She went on to say that she found it very hurtful that anyone would suggest that vaccines cause autism because that wasn’t the case for her grandson. Yet she couldn’t see that denying the experience of hundreds in the room who had watched their children regress after vaccines was just as hurtful.

What she didn’t seem to realize is that not all autism is the same and assuming that he was unvaccinated before two months old, both scenarios could be true. But it is wrong to deny one version of reality while clinging to another, especially when the choice validates Pharma, letting the drug companies and the CDC off the hook and at the same time, throwing hundreds of thousands of families under the bus.

The Disrupter
The biggest outrage and wake up call for me came at the very end of the hearing. The sergeant directs the seating in the hearing room. I was seated next to a woman who I didn’t know, but I assumed was a lobbyist or maybe even the bill’s author. I was annoyed by her constant typing on her computer, jumping up from her seat to chat with lobbyists. She was completely oblivious and unconcerned with the heartfelt testimonies being shared, even rolling her eyes when people spoke about toxins.

Her incessant typing involved writing numerous legislators with talking points and follow-ups, reinforcing the legislation and refuting points made by the opposition. I also saw a more formal email, which she worked on for quite a while, and then sent to the bill’s sponsor. She was typing furiously on it, ignoring the father who was crying, describing the death of his infant. I watched to see if she would even look up, but she just tic-tacked away, cold as ice. Her lack of humanity disturbed and saddened me. The email looked like a speech and I thought maybe it was for the next reading of the bill or an interview. But what do you know? As the sponsor began his closing remarks, it was word-for-word what I had watched her type just hours before.

I admit that I was naive and inexperienced as to how things work in the state capitol but it made me sick to my stomach to watch someone so disrespectful and oblivious be able to “speak” through a puppet legislator, while everyone else clearly assumed his words were his own. It also really drove home what a David and Goliath fight this is, how it truly is a war lead by Pharma, with the help of media and legislators, against already beleaguered families, their providers and the population as a whole.

Betrayed
I don’t have words to describe the disgust, betrayal, and fury I felt, as a life long Democrat, watching my Party’s legislators vote down all reasonable amendments and pass this egregious bill out of committee, despite 13+ hours of compelling personal testimonies. They are on the wrong side of history. They heard the stories of injury, disability, and death and truly didn’t care. They heard facts about corruption and scientific misconduct at the CDC and truly didn’t care. It was clear they had witnessed the weird disconnect of doctors saying “this can’t happen”, while surrounded by hundreds of people saying “it happened to me”.

Once again, they just didn’t care. Because, you know, measles.

The same legislators who would profoundly defend the right of body autonomy and champion personal choice in reproductive matters clearly don’t apply those values to vaccination choice. The Party that says they care about the under-represented and misunderstood minority groups clearly make an exception when it comes to forced vaccination. The Party that would never tolerate the tracking and registry of Muslims is fine with tracking and labeling this minority group. The Party that rejects the industry-funded junk science questioning climate change and embraces independent researchers who sound the alarm and explain what we can see with our own eyes cannot see that when it comes to vaccination, they are doing the opposite: wholeheartedly swallowing industry-funded junk science. They champion the idea that “the more vaccines the better.” They propagate the “nothing to see here” mantras and reject independent scientists who explain the exploding rates of chronic disease with real research and real science.

My heart breaks for my Party. My heart breaks for Colorado and the other states fighting similar battles. But most of all my heart breaks for the children who will be sickened, injured or killed by a vaccine program that has gone off the rails. It breaks my heart for the injuries that are dismissed and the parents who are bullied by our institutions and left to pick up the pieces.

There is no such thing as an “anti-vaxxer” or a “pro-vaxxer.” That is an industry narrative that generates fear, distraction and sells more products. The only labels we should be worried about are state control vs. parental control. The parents who testified could have been any one of us. They trusted but were harmed and then betrayed by a corrupt, unaccountable, industry-captured medical system. They were mama and papa bears fighting for their own children, your children, and society as a whole.

Wake up. Fight back.

Join your local efforts in defending medical freedom, body autonomy and the right to decline pharmaceutical products before it is too late. And if you are the praying type, it’s time to pray hard."

Delight

27th April 2019, 01:34

Colorado HB 1312 “Debate” – First Hand Report
(One more horror story :( Not that the posters on this thread need another one, but for those who don't yet realize the awful truth, and would rather know the worst rather than remain in the dark, not just about vaccines, but to what low the Democratic Party has sunk. )

Thanks for posting.
We can't count on a "party" to stand up as all party's politicians take Pharma's money. I have liked Tulsi Gabbard but she is not seeing vaccination as an issue except people should have access to vaccines.

If these same people have a child or grandchild, they MAY be able to feel something then.
I will choose to think that something can stop this train wreck. I like what Del Bigtree says every time I hear him... "We are winning..."

I found this article on Sherry Tennpenny's blog, posted 04/01/2019

Free Speech? Follow the Money – Take Action
By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM (https://vaxxter.com/free-speech-follow-the-money-take-action/)

According to Webster’s Dictionary, “to censor” means “to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable.”

Censorship occurs when a group of people – or organization(s) – impose their political or moral values on others by suppressing their words, images, ideas and now, even their thoughts, if that information is contrary to the suppressor’s stated opinions. Sometimes referred to as ‘collectivist thinking,’ collectivism promotes a group’s opinion as right by making the individual’s opinion wrong, even labeling contrarian views as “dangerous misinformation.” In a collectivist society, people identify with the group’s mantra and run roughshod over the views of the individual. Thus collectivist thinking and censorship is contrary to our long-held values of America individualism.

The intolerance of infection – a topic we explore in our MVI Boot Camp Herd Immunity module – is being used to eliminate the free flow of information and will decimate the medical needs of a large number of individuals. There are more than 130 bills currently being considered that could elimininate our rights to self-determination regarding our health, undermining freedoms long embraced by our society. To keep abreast of vaccine legislation in your state, go to NVIC Advocacy and sign up for free alerts.y – Take Action. The end points out some action steps.

The Global Plan
On March 19, 2019, the WHO hosted a gathering in Geneva with a policy meeting of its Global health partners. The purpose of this 3-day meeting was to develop a “new vision and strategy for vaccines and immunization” for the period 2021-2030. The WHO released this as part of the meeting’s summary:

“People must be at the center of healthcare and their free and equal rights to essential healthcare services such as vaccinations must be observed throughout their life-course, without discrimination,” said Ms Kate Gilmore, Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations. “There is no such thing as a right to refuse vaccines when the consequences of doing so is to be borne by others and undermine the rights of others to health, as recognized in the International Human Rights Framework.”

What does that mean in plain English?

Vaccination is to be considered an essential health care service.
Vaccination is to be cradle-to-grave – actually pre-birth to grave – with the addition of vaccination during pregnancy.
By saying, “there is no such thing as a RIGHT to Refuse,” exemptions will be eliminated worldwide, a violation of at least 7 of the 10 tenants of the Nuremberg code.
Early Censorship
In 2015, I was censored and nearly refused entry into Australia to speak at seven relatively small Family Living conferences scheduled for five cities along the east coast of the continent. Contrary to the twisted reports, I was going there as an invited guest to be a speaker among several panelists. The trolls were activated and campaigned heavily to keep me out of the country. They actually caused an international incident.

The vitriol has continued and in fact, is much worse in 2019 then it was merely four years ago. Here’s one example, from the online edition of The Spectator, of the hundreds of accusations presented as fact against those who question vaccines.

“For some people, the astonishing benefits of vaccination are a lesson which they seem determined not to learn. The ‘anti-vaxxer’ movement has instead managed to convince itself that vaccination is a form of oppressive government control over a country’s citizens. It is a deeply irresponsible falsehood being spread through social media…

The article goes on to describe anti-vaxxers as “deranged conspiracy theorists” and that telling parents it is wrong or criminal to question vaccines “would be a gift to the conspiracy theorists.” Note that this is listed as a ‘leading article.’ It should be posted as an op-ed opinion piece. The author’s name isn’t listed and there is no adherence to basic journalistic principles: presenting information from both sides.

But articles like this are leading the charge to justify nanny-state laws and egregious public health campaigns. States and countries are currently considering laws to make discussing what has been labeled as “misinformation on vaccination” a criminal offense.

If those laws are passed, social media and retail giants such as Amazon will be forced to eliminate all vaccine information that isn’t lock-step with the government’s message or face criminal prosecution. Some public libraries are already considering removing vaccine and autism books from their shelves, amounting to literal book burning.

What in the world are they going to do with the thousands of scientific articles and studies published in peer-reviewed journals showing problems caused by vaccines?

These are staggering actions, showing complete disrespect for American constitutionally guaranteed principles of free speech. Haven’t we fought wars over retaining our right to free flow of ideas and freedom of speech?

The WHO declared “vaccine hesitancy” among the top 10 global health risks in 2019. What does that really mean? With the US vaccination rate hovering around 95% and the global vaccination rate approaching 73% for all available vaccines, why is a small percentage of either completely or partially unvaccinated children such a global threat?

Follow the money
Unvaccinated children per se are not a threat to public health; collectively, they are a threat to the vaccine industry’s bottom line. If someone actually funded and completed a sizable vax vs unvaxxed study, a monumental paradigm shift would occur. To use a current political analogy here, it’s like the bomb that exploded with the release of the Mueller Report. Those who were expecting the report to fully incriminate the president are sorting through the cognitive dissonance that resulted when the report was not in line with their expectations.

If the vax vs unvaxxed study were completed, those who expect it to completely shut down the anti-vax discussion will also experience explosive cognitive dissonance. The study would no doubt prove, once and for all, that unvaccinated kids are much more healthy than vaccinated kids and would expose one of the biggest, multi-generational lies ever told – that vaccines are harmless and necessary. The Emperor would be totally naked. That’s a result that pharma just can’t risk; it would permanently destroy their revenue model.

If you’re a business owner, consider this:

How would you like 4 million, government-guaranteed new customers every year? (number of annual births in the US) How would you like to have laws in place, forcing people to buy multiples of your product? (multiple doses of 16 vaccines) What if you had no requirement to make a safe product because you have government protection against all liability, even if your product harms your customer? In fact, what if your product was so unsafe, the US Supreme Court labeled it as “unavoidably unsafe” but you could sell it to your customers anyway?! What if this defective product brought in billions of dollars in year-after-year revenues? Ohh! – and what if your product injured your customer and you could sell your customer additional products to solve the problem your product caused, adding billions more to your bottom line? (drugs to treat vaccine side effects.)

Pretty sweet deal, eh? It would be brilliant if it were not so sinister.

TIME TO TAKE ACTION
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently said that our country was built on protecting the rights of minorities. Our constitutional republic has always protected the rights of minorities. We all know that a person’s color, creed, religion, and gender is legally protected against discrimination. But with the censorship of the vaccine debate, all discussions on safety stop. All discussion on how to improve the product aren’t entertained, even though exploring safer vaccines was required by law with the passage of the National Vaccine Childhood Injury Act in 1986. And because every vaccine that is approved creates an avalanche of money for everyone in the supply chain – manufacturers, distributors, hospitals and doctors – an intelligent discussion about removing unnecessary vaccination is impossible. For example, why do American children need 4 doses of polio vaccination since there has been no wild poliovirus in the Western hemisphere since 1991?

RFK went on to say,

“Right now I’m thinking of how blatant, how anti-democratic and fundamentally anti-American the censorship has become. They won’t debate us. Their only weapon is to silence us.”

Ai Weiwei, China’s most famous living artist, is also an activist. He uses his art as a form of social engagement, calling attention to China’s human rights violations. In a country where free speech is not recognized as a right, he’s been beaten by the police, has lived under house arrest, has had his newly-built studio bulldozed by local officials and is constantly subjected to surveillance. As an independent thinker who is willing to risk exposing his government’s wrong-doings, he is viewed as a threat to “harmonious society.”

We take free speech for granted in the US. But our ability to openly discuss vaccination travesties and expose our government’s wrong-doings is being taken away. It is being replaced with vaccine dogma and CDC propaganda we are not allowed to refute.

Will we soon face the same punishments that have been poured out on Ai Weiwei?

Before it gets to that place, we just actively fight back.

We need to point out that Public Health is more than just 100% vaccination rates and a small number of infections.
Public health has become obsessed with the extinction of a few pathogens. Shouldn’t public health be obsessed with identifying why 1 in 5 children have learning disabilities and removing the cause?
Public health has become completely intolerant of a fever and a rash.
Public health needs to see that there is a monumental health crisis in our children and be FORCED to examine the connection between injecting foreign matter and ill-health.
ACTION ITEMS:

We can’t sit back and wait for someone to solve this for us. The White Knight on a White Horse is not going to show up to save the day. We need to put all hands on deck. Get busy. Get active. Do your part. Here’s a suggestion as a place to start:

Write a one-page letter, telling your story of injury, telling your story of personal and professional censorship and then FAX it to:
The National Coalition Against Censorship – they don’t have to agree with us, but they MUST not stop our speech https://ncac.org/report-censorship
Choose organizations on this page and fax your letter to them: https://ncac.org/free-expression-network
Find fax numbers for your state and national legislators. They need 1000s of these letters.
Also – take “left/right politics” out of these suggestions, and give this some thought:

What organizations should we approach to discuss the censorship of vaccine information?
Campaign for Liberty?
The Tea Party?
The ACLU? They have fought – and won – many free speech cases.
Maybe even the NRA? Don’t automatically snub that idea and rule it out. They’re big. They’re well funded. They have a platform. They support Second Amendment rights; would they support our First Amendment rights?
What individuals should we approach? (please think platform, not politics here)
Candace Owen – Please help me to find a way to get a copy of VAXXED into the hands of Candace Owens. She needs to know about the CDC whistleblower who exposed that black boys have been targeted.
Branden Straka – with #WalkAway. After all, it was Adam Schiff (D) who contacted Facebook and Amazon to start the elimination of the vaccine discussions on social media.
Tucker Carlson – It is rumored his son had a reaction to a flu shot and he’s a big proponent of free speech, even when he disagrees about the content of that speech.
Mark Levin and/or Judge Jeanine – They are both huge proponents of the Constitution and First Amendment rights
We MUST think laterally and explore how to partner with organizations that have a platform much larger than we have. This is the fight for the DNA of humanity.

Think big.

Let me know your ideas.

Delight

27th April 2019, 02:42

BC fast track of mandatory vaccines

O4y4pXLVEN0

onawah

27th April 2019, 03:26

Yes, agreed. :nod: And I just want to say that I think it's very good to have a thread like this where members can talk about how they feel once they see these murderous policies for what they are.

It's not so easy to recover from the shock and disillusionment once we have those :facepalm: moments that bring us out of denial, cold turkey, and I think sharing those feelings with others in the same boat can help.

My first big one was 911, and they just kept getting worse after that, but each shock helped me to prepare for the next one, because it became obvious fairly soon that more were to come...

The best remedies, I think, are to connect with others who are in the know and keep on finding ways, however small, to bring in more light and truth, and find more positive actions that can be taken.

Colorado HB 1312 “Debate” – First Hand Report
(One more horror story :( Not that the posters on this thread need another one, but for those who don't yet realize the awful truth, and would rather know the worst rather than remain in the dark, not just about vaccines, but to what low the Democratic Party has sunk. )

Thanks for posting.
We can't count on a "party" to stand up as all party's politicians take Pharma's money. I have liked Tulsi Gabbard but she is not seeing vaccination as an issue except people should have access to vaccines.

If these same people have a child or grandchild, they MAY be able to feel something then.
I will choose to think that something can stop this train wreck. I like what Del Bigtree says every time I hear him... "We are winning..."

Delight

27th April 2019, 03:55

It's not so easy to recover from the shock and disillusionment once we have those :facepalm: moments that bring us out of denial, cold turkey, and I think sharing those feelings with others in the same boat can help.

My first big one was 911, and they just kept getting worse after that, but each shock helped me to prepare for the next one, because it became fairly soon that more were to come...

The best remedies, I think, are to connect with others who are in the know and keep on finding ways, however small, to bring in more light and truth, and find more positive actions that can be taken.

9/11 was a huge slap in the face. I appreciate having a way to express my outrage and I am certain we are all facing a huge wake up call.

Alan Phillips is an attorney in NC. He is someone I contacted when I first encountered being forced to receive a vaccination in 2009. He was so responsive and helpful.

Attorney Alan Phillips needs your support. His focus has been vaccine law and the NC State Bar – with no evidence of wrongdoing, and completely ignoring the sanctity of attorney-client privilege – is currently seeking years of his client records. Who knows what the motivations of the NC State Bar might be, but one thing is clear, this fishing expedition is unethical and requires an independent review of the NC State Bar. Currently, despite a court order, Attorney Phillips refuses to reveal his privileged client records and faces contempt of court, which could result in fines and/or jail time. Read morehttps://ohioamf.org/blog/news/2019/04/01/support-vaccine-rights-attorney-alan-phillips/?fbclid=IwAR029YHJwsUqRbUTdZsPRkszTROc7jUZ7n_0jrsjtdU8ekSn8iJsPv3k6tA

At the end of this long and valuable discussion, the huge advertising issue of ability to persuade and media dependence on pharma advertising is discussed. Also our significant problems as activists with how to introduce the subject of truth without pushing people away. The emotional component of approach is really significant.

If anyone follows Joe Rogan, he is GREAT about just asking questions of people (like Peter Hotez) and they don't react defensively and TELL him what is true (even if by the way they answer).

Segment mentioned starts from 1:29:06

LiLawleH2k8

shaberon

27th April 2019, 03:57

One could almost replace "Vaccine Issue" in the title with "Medical System".

Specifically, I believe that vaccination stole the credit due ordinary basic sanitation, soap and bleach. At that time, there was a loss of organic food and natural immune boosters, vinegar, ferments, etc., along with increasing use of poison. Totalitarian prongs spreading everywhere, Pilgrims' Society. Payback for 1812.

There is a thread from a couple of months ago where a team in Italy analyzed samples of a "multiple flu" vaccination. I don't think they found the supposedly useful agent, but did find around twenty-six contaminants of many kinds. We need more people like that who can present actionable evidence.

Allopathic medicine is particularly useful with respect to trauma, but it isn't exactly "care". In many cases the doctor is killing the patient just mentally.

Delight

27th April 2019, 05:27

CNN AND NBC CAUGHT FAKING PHOTO OF BABY WITH MEASLES
April 25, 2019 (https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/04/25/cnn-and-nbc-caught-faking-photo-of-baby-with-measles-to-stoke-mass-hysteria/)

Vic Bishop, Staff Writer
Waking Times

In the midst of what is being referred to as the worst measles outbreak in 25 years, the mainstream media is doing their part in stoking national hysteria. The point is to convince the general public that measles is the number one health crisis at the moment, and that it is so bad that we must forfeit our right to health freedom and submit to state-sanctioned, forced vaccinations.

Never mind that there a thousand more pressing and more dangerous health crises to address. Not the least of which is the fact that pharmaceutical drug overdoses kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, with over 70,000 preventable deaths in 2017 alone.

Never-the-less, the mainstream media is doing everything it can to create hysteria, even doctoring photos of newborn babies, giving them scary measles looking sores to dupe the public into demanding the government take action. But they are faking photos. They are presenting evidence that is fake, as though it were real, when it is not.

In a clip from a news segment originally aired on CNN, a stock photo of a healthy baby was photoshopped with measles sores, then shown on air along with the message the anti-vaccination information is dangerous.

Here is a screenshot taken from the CNN segment in question:

https://c81s22ku6ih1er8af18cv13c-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Measles-Fake-Photo-1.jpg

Here is the original stock photo, before the image was doctored:

https://c81s22ku6ih1er8af18cv13c-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Stock-Baby-Measles.png

YouTube reporter Nathan Stolpman digs into this travesty in the following video, analyzing the photos, and showing how the same fake photo has been used by at least CNN, NBC, and The Times of Israel. Please take a look and share far and wide.

Am630xkAotI

What are your thoughts on this? Should these news sources be banned from social media, YouTube and other platforms for clearly spreading fake news?

https://c81s22ku6ih1er8af18cv13c-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Fake-news-measles.jpg

Intranuclear

27th April 2019, 18:35

Hah, the fakery is SO BAD that it is laughable or rather made me angry.
I immediately noticed the use of the clone tool. I did not bother showing all the fake texturing as you can see it yourself but just circled 3 of the areas where the person who faked it did not even bother to rotate the image to make it appear slightly less fake.

40482

onawah

27th April 2019, 18:49

Childhood Shingles Resulting from Chickenpox Vaccination: “Rare” or Predictable?
By the Children’s Health Defense Team
4/25/19
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-safety/childhood-shingles-resulting-from-chickenpox-vaccination-rare-or-predictable/?utm_source=mailchimp
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/04-25-19-Varciella-Vaccine_Featured_Image.jpg

"From the inception of mass vaccination, childhood vaccines have produced a raft of unintended consequences. One of the biggest problems—gaining steam over the past several decades—involves the vaccine-induced creation of brand-new risks and vulnerabilities that can be more serious than the condition a given vaccine might be intended to address.

The varicella (chickenpox) vaccine represents a case in point. Chickenpox, usually mild when experienced in childhood, was once a routine rite of passage. After the rollout of universal varicella vaccination, the incidence of chickenpox declined but observers began noticing a “’perverse’ boom” in shingles (also called herpes zoster). Chickenpox and shingles infections both stem from varicella zoster virus—and before the advent of the varicella vaccine, children infected with chickenpox helped boost adults’ immunity to shingles by inhibiting the latent virus’s reactivation. Chickenpox vaccination disrupted this intergenerational protective mechanism, not only eliminating regular boosting for adults but shifting downward the average age at which shingles occurs. In addition , because varicella vaccine-induced immunity decreases by 8% with each year since vaccination, previously vaccinated young adults are at increased risk for varicella outbreaks and potential complications later in life. In short, while the reduced circulation of wild chickenpox virus may spare some healthy children a benign case of chickenpox, children now face the more serious risk of developing shingles at young ages and chickenpox at older ages.

… the incidence of shingles in the U.S. rose by 63% among 10- to 19-year-olds as of the mid-2000s.
Predictions and case reports
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) added first one and then two doses of chickenpox vaccine to the U.S. vaccine schedule (in 1996 and 2006, respectively), numerous scientists predicted—accurately as things have turned out—that there would be a chickenpox-shingles tradeoff. In fact, the United Kingdom does not include the varicella vaccine in its childhood schedule to this day precisely because researchers there recognized the potential for routine chickenpox vaccination to “drive up the age at which those who are non immune get the illness” and increase the incidence of shingles in all age groups. Confirming the initial predictions, the incidence of shingles in the U.S. rose by 63% among 10- to 19-year-olds as of the mid-2000s.

Ordinarily, clinicians do not expect to encounter shingles in children unless the children are seriously immunocompromised. Perhaps this is why—in one case report after another describing shingles in otherwise healthy vaccinated children—researchers characterize the situation as “rare” or “unique.” Even so, young shingles patients’ often dramatic clinical symptoms have forced researchers to acknowledge that shingles is definitely “possible” in children vaccinated against varicella, and when they use appropriate molecular analyses, they find that the vaccine-strain virus is the causative agent.

Across studies, the average age of shingles infection in children was 5.3 years, and the infection surfaced, on average, about three years after chickenpox vaccination.
In 2017, clinicians encountered shingles in a healthy 19-month-old who had received a chickenpox vaccine six months previously, and they decided to put their findings in context by searching the English-language literature for similar cases. They identified roughly two dozen published cases of vaccine-strain shingles in “immunocompetent” children and adolescents who had received a chickenpox vaccine but otherwise had “no history of varicella or exposure to varicella during gestation.” A number of the studies reported shingles in very young children—such as a 15-month-old vaccinated three months previously, a 2-year-old “vaccinated for varicella at 17 months,” another vaccinated 2-year-old, and a 3.5-year-old girl who had received the chickenpox vaccine around age 2. Across studies, the average age of shingles infection in children was 5.3 years, and the infection surfaced, on average, about three years after chickenpox vaccination.

Adverse events and complications
Young shingles patients experience a wide range of “rare but important adverse events.” Case reports have described:

Lesions on the forehead, nasal bridge and upper and lower eyelids of a “previously healthy” 6-year-old boy who received the chickenpox vaccine at 1 year of age.
Persistent shingles-related eye complications in a 6-year-old girl “with no medical history” who had been given two doses of chickenpox vaccine (at age 1 and again one year prior to the onset of symptoms).
Headache, eye pain, eyelid rash and other symptoms in a 7-year-old boy who was “otherwise healthy and had received all of his scheduled vaccinations.”
Ocular herpes zoster lesions and nerve palsy in an 8-year-old boy with “up-to-date immunizations” and an “unremarkable” medical history.
Unfortunately, shingles carries the risk of even more serious complications, including the vision-threatening eye condition called herpes zoster ophthalmicus—experienced by up to one in four persons with shingles. In a case series reporting shingles in seven “immunized healthy children without underlying immunodeficiency,” researchers described severe lesions as well as upper respiratory symptoms and joint pain. Other major complications that may occur either in tandem with rash or on their own include central nervous system problems such as encephalitis and meningitis. A 19-year-old female college student who had received two prior doses of varicella vaccine developed shingles-related encephalitis that landed her in intensive care and resulted in lengthy hospitalization. The strong antiviral drugs used to treat these conditions can cause kidney dysfunction. Mayo Clinic researchers report that asthma and atopic dermatitis both are associated with a higher risk of shingles.

At the same time, because the varicella vaccine is a live virus vaccine, people who get chickenpox vaccines can spread the vaccine-strain varicella-zoster-virus to others, a troublesome fact quietly acknowledged on the CDC’s website.
The “cost of success”?
Researchers at the University of British Columbia have suggested that vaccine-associated shingles complications are just “one of the costs” of the “success” achieved with universal chickenpox vaccination. However, given that one in five children who receives the varicella vaccine develops a “breakthrough” chickenpox infection anyway, just what kind of “success” are we talking about? In fact, “in communities with high vaccination coverage, varicella cases mostly occur in vaccinated individuals.” At the same time, because the varicella vaccine is a live virus vaccine, “[p]eople who get chickenpox vaccines can spread the vaccine-strain varicella-zoster-virus to others,” a troublesome fact quietly acknowledged on the CDC’s website. When those “others” are young adults or older, the cases not infrequently result in serious complications. Finally, it should be noted that, as is the case with nearly all vaccines on the market, the FDA approved varicella vaccines without any long-term safety testing—the vaccines received a scant 42 days at most of monitoring after a single dose of vaccine.

In 2010, CDC researchers identified yet another concern when they reported that their laboratory had observed—in about 11% of the adverse events resulting from varicella vaccination—“recombination between vaccine and wild-type [varicella zoster virus] strains.” Moreover, the “recombinants” demonstrated “a selective preference for reactivation, enhanced replication, and/or an enhanced ability to traverse the nerve.” The World Health Organization and other bodies have acknowledged that this type of vaccine-plus-wild-virus recombination raises “unique safety issues.” The CDC researchers noted that the shingles vaccines it now recommends for older adults (“formulated at a virus concentration more than 14-fold higher than that of childhood varicella vaccine”) are likely to “substantially” increase the occurrence of “vaccine-wild-type recombination.”

It is time to bring “unintended” consequences out into the open and make sure they factor into all assessments of vaccine safety and efficacy.
Chickenpox vaccines are far from the only type of vaccine to give rise to unintended consequences. In a recent commentary, a leading pertussis expert admitted, for instance, that pertussis vaccination actually increases vaccinated individuals’ lifetime susceptibility to pertussis. Merck’s highly flawed measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine (which relied on faked data to achieve Food and Drug Administration approval) has likewise backfired, prompting rampant fertility-threatening mumps outbreaks in young adults. It is time to bring “unintended” consequences out into the open and make sure they factor into all assessments of vaccine safety and efficacy."

Delight

28th April 2019, 01:04

Lots of good comments on this article. I found the citation posted below there. Information is circulating, which IMO is hopeful

New York Tickets 12 People For Defying Measles Vaccination Order As Cases Spike
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 04/26/2019
(https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-25/new-york-tickets-12-people-defying-measles-vaccination-order-cases-spike)

New York City has slapped 12 people with civil summonses who it says were not complying with a mandatory measles vaccination order, as the city's worst outbreak since 1991 rose to 390, according to Wednesday data.

The outbreak began last October and has been largely confined to children living in Brooklyn's Orthodox Jewish communities. Two of the 61 cases confirmed since last Thursday are pregnant women, according to Reuters, citing the city's health department.

The Health Department took the unusual step earlier this month of issuing an emergency order requiring unvaccinated people in affected neighborhoods to get the measles, mumps and rubella, or MMR, vaccine unless they could otherwise show they had immunity.

The 12 people issued summons for defying the order must attend a hearing and face a fine of up to $1,000 if found to be noncompliant. -Reuters

Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe
Neil Z. Miller
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016 (http://www.jpands.org/vol21no2/miller.pdf)

ABSTRACT
Although health authorities including the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) claim that childhood vaccines are
safe and recommend combining multiple vaccines during one
visit, a review of data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) shows a dose-dependent association between
the number of vaccines administered simultaneously and the
likelihood of hospitalization or death for an adverse reaction.
Additionally, younger age at the time of the adverse reaction is
associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death.
..........................
Conclusion
The safety of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was
never affirmed in clinical studies. Vaccines are administered
to millions of infants every year, yet health authorities have
no scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all
combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive.
National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific
evidence. No child should be subjected to a health policy that
is not based on sound scientific principles and, in fact, has been
shown to be potentially dangerous.

Undesirable outcomes associated with childhood
vaccination can be reduced by requiring national vaccination
policies to be supported by scientific evidence, holding
vaccine manufacturers accountable when their products
harm consumers, and urging major news outlets that rely on
pharmaceutical advertising revenue to change their business
models so that crucial scientific research, regardless of how
controversial it may be, is widely disseminated into the public
domain. Meanwhile, the evidence presented in this study
shows that multiple vaccines administered during one visit,
and vaccinating young infants, significantly increase morbidity
and mortality. Parents and physicians should consider health
options associated with a lower risk of hospitalization or death.

Regarding the shut up of information on social media
Robert F Kennedy Jr REACTS to Adam Schiff’s CENSORSHIP Demand Letter
Mar 29, 2019
LEARN MORE ABOUT
CHILDERN'S DEFENSE FUND
https://www.childrensdefense.org/

6JJAzLh_JQU

In case anyone missed the censorship demand

Schiff Sends Letter to Google, Facebook Regarding Anti-Vaccine Misinformation
Schiff Asks CEOs to Address this Important Public Health Issue on Respective Platforms (https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/schiff-sends-letter-to-google-facebook-regarding-anti-vaccine-misinformation)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), sent a letter to Sundar Pichai and Mark Zuckerberg, the Chief Executive Officers of Google and Facebook, respectively, to express concern that the company’s platforms including YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, are surfacing and recommending information that discourages parents from vaccinating their children, contributing to declining vaccination rates which could reverse progress made in tackling vaccine-preventable diseases.

“As a Member of Congress who is deeply concerned about declining vaccination rates, I am requesting additional information on the steps that you currently take to provide medically accurate information on vaccinations to your users, and to encourage you to consider additional steps you can take to address this growing problem,” Schiff wrote in the letter. “I was pleased to see YouTube’s recent announcement that it will no longer recommend videos that violate its community guidelines, such as conspiracy theories or medically inaccurate videos, and encourage further action to be taken related to vaccine misinformation.”

The scientific and medical communities are in overwhelming consensus that vaccines are both effective and safe. There is no evidence to suggest that vaccines cause life-threatening or disabling diseases, and the dissemination of unfounded and debunked theories about the dangers of vaccinations pose a great risk to public health.

In 2015, Rep. Schiff first introduced the bipartisan Vaccines Save Lives resolution, recognizing the importance of vaccines and immunizations in the United States. The resolution sends a message of unequivocal Congressional support for vaccines and urges parents, in consultation with their health care providers, to follow scientific evidence and the consensus of medical experts in favor of timely vaccination for the well-being of their children and surrounding communities.

The full text of the letters are here (https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/schiff-sends-letter-to-google-facebook-regarding-anti-vaccine-misinformation)

and of course Amazon too. Vaccine "mis-information" books and videos will include books about REMEDIES for injury

Adam Schiff asks Amazon to Censor Books About Vaccination

The latest call for censorship of the vaccine topic is targeting Amazon, which sells books. Lots of books. MY BOOKS (from blogger "Age of Autism"). There are books on Amazon that I do not ever want to read on topics I find disgusting, distasteful and even dangerous. I do not want those books censored. I can choose NOT to buy those books,. Censorship of a topic is unAmerican in the extreme. Censorship is the tool of despots and dictators who fear what Schoolhouse Rock taught me in the 1970s. Knowledge is power. Knowledge drives consumer choices.

Do you know how many DIET books are on Amazon? Over 60,000. They are often best sellers, yet Americans are in an obesity epidemic. I wrote a book, a memoir, with a chapter on vaccination. My best friends in the world know that I have vaccine injured children. They have met them. They love them. They read my book. They vaccinated their children with all the vaccines I said were a big NO for me. People read and make their own decisions.

Adam Schiff is from California, by the way. We're also learning that many vaccine related movies have been pulled from Amazon Prime. Can you heel the heels stomping behind you?

..........

‘Every online platform, including Amazon, must act responsibly. read more here (https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/03/adam-schiff-asks-amazon-to-censor-books-about-vaccination.html)

Sandy123

28th April 2019, 01:05

In Colorado the rules are that only two cases of measles are required to be considered as an "epidemic". I watched it on the news last week. Scare tactics.

onawah

28th April 2019, 18:17

Bubu

28th April 2019, 18:37

frankstien

28th April 2019, 18:56

The measles outbreak is a massive false flag

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-04-28-measles-outbreak-is-a-massive-false-flag-outbreaks-infected-migrants.html

Delight

28th April 2019, 19:01

Suzanne Humphries, MD on NaturalHealth365 Talk Hour, reveals the uncensored truth about vaccine safety.
"Vaccine Fraud – The Undeniable Truth Exposed
Our Guest: Suzanne Humphries, MD is a conventionally educated medical doctor with specialties in internal medicine and nephrology. After seeing vaccine injuries in her own patients that were categorically ignored by the mainstream doctors and administration in her work place, she started researching vaccines to disprove the claims the doctors made out of ignorance to refute her own experience and those of her patients. The resistance she encountered only showed her how important it is to keep researching and bring out the truths she discovered to the public. On this show, you’ll discover the hidden truths behind the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. Make no mistake about it, the information you’re about to hear is well-grounded in the scientific literature and the absence of good science will become clear to you – after listening to this program. Don’t miss it!"
Livestreamed Sat. 04/28/19 9:00 am – 9:00 pm (ET)
In the archive now here:
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/free-show (https://www.naturalhealth365.com/free-show/)

Here's the audio (stream or download):
https://s3.amazonaws.com/NaturalHealth365/th-podcasts/02-05-17-humphries-vaccines.mp3

https://s3.amazonaws.com/NaturalHealth365/th-podcasts/02-05-17-humphries-vaccines.mp3

This is a really great discussion posted. I hope more people ( Thanks to hear you speak up Babu) will be listening and adding information to their own arsenals to discuss with those we love.

Dr. Humphries mentions "auto-antibodies".

Here is an article about dogs. Vaccines have unintended side effects. ARE THEY NECESSARY EVILS????

It is not a stretch at all for me to ask about modern "diseases" like Chronic Fatigue syndrome, a huge wave of joint issues, all KINDS of syndromes that are just called a "matter of aging". In the discussion with Dr. Humphries, she mentions that repeated vaccination has cumulative effects as to auto-antibodies.

The Purdue Vaccination Studies And Auto-Antibodies

By: Catherine O'Driscoll

A team at Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine conducted several studies (1,2) to determine if vaccines can cause changes in the immune system of dogs that might lead to life-threatening immune-mediated diseases. They obviously conducted this research because concern already existed. It was sponsored by the Haywood Foundation which itself was looking for evidence that such changes in the human immune system might also be vaccine induced. It found the evidence.

The vaccinated, but not the non-vaccinated, dogs in the Purdue studies developed autoantibodies to many of their own biochemicals, including fibronectin, laminin, DNA, albumin, cytochrome C, cardiolipin and collagen.

This means that the vaccinated dogs — “but not the non-vaccinated dogs”– were attacking their own fibronectin, which is involved in tissue repair, cell multiplication and growth, and differentiation between tissues and organs in a living organism.

The vaccinated Purdue dogs also developed autoantibodies to laminin, which is involved in many cellular activities including the adhesion, spreading, differentiation, proliferation and movement of cells. Vaccines thus appear to be capable of removing the natural intelligence of cells.

Autoantibodies to cardiolipin are frequently found in patients with the serious disease systemic lupus erythematosus and also in individuals with other autoimmune diseases. The presence of elevated anti-cardiolipin antibodies is significantly associated with clots within the heart or blood vessels, in poor blood clotting, haemorrhage, bleeding into the skin, foetal loss and neurological conditions.

The Purdue studies also found that vaccinated dogs were developing autoantibodies to their own collagen. About one quarter of all the protein in the body is collagen. Collagen provides structure to our bodies, protecting and supporting the softer tissues and connecting them with the skeleton. It is no wonder that Canine Health Concern’s 1997 study of 4,000 dogs showed a high number of dogs developing mobility problems shortly after they were vaccinated (noted in my 1997 book, What Vets Don’t Tell You About Vaccines).

Perhaps most worryingly, the Purdue studies found that the vaccinated dogs had developed autoantibodies to their own DNA. Did the alarm bells sound? Did the scientific community call a halt to the vaccination program? No. Instead, they stuck their fingers in the air, saying more research is needed to ascertain whether vaccines can cause genetic damage. Meanwhile, the study dogs were found good homes, but no long-term follow-up has been conducted. At around the same time, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force initiated several studies to find out why 160,000 cats each year in the USA develop terminal cancer at their vaccine injection sites.(3) The fact that cats can get vaccine-induced cancer has been acknowledged by veterinary bodies around the world, and even the British Government acknowledged it through its Working Group charged with the task of looking into canine and feline vaccines(4) following pressure from Canine Health Concern. What do you imagine was the advice of the AVMA Task Force, veterinary bodies and governments? “Carry on vaccinating until we find out why vaccines are killing cats, and which cats are most likely to die.”

In America, in an attempt to mitigate the problem, they’re vaccinating cats in the tail or leg so they can amputate when cancer appears. Great advice if it’s not your cat amongst the hundreds of thousands on the “oops” list.

But other species are okay – right? Wrong. In August 2003, the Journal of Veterinary Medicine carried an Italian study which showed that dogs also develop vaccine-induced cancers at their injection sites.(5) We already know that vaccine-site cancer is a possible sequel to human vaccines, too, since the Salk polio vaccine was said to carry a monkey retrovirus (from cultivating the vaccine on monkey organs) that produces inheritable cancer. The monkey retrovirus SV40 keeps turning up in human cancer sites.

It is also widely acknowledged that vaccines can cause a fast-acting, usually fatal, disease called autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA). Without treatment, and frequently with treatment, individuals can die in agony within a matter of days. Merck, itself a multinational vaccine manufacturer, states in The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy that autoimmune haemolytic anaemia may be caused by modified live-virus vaccines, as do Tizard’s Veterinary Immunology (4th edition) and the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.(6) The British Government’s Working Group, despite being staffed by vaccine-industry consultants who say they are independent, also acknowledged this fact. However, no one warns the pet owners before their animals are subjected to an unnecessary booster, and very few owners are told why after their pets die of AIHA.

A Wide Range of Vaccine-induced Diseases
We also found some worrying correlations between vaccine events and the onset of arthritis in our 1997 survey. Our concerns were compounded by research in the human field.

The New England Journal of Medicine, for example, reported that it is possible to isolate the rubella virus from affected joints in children vaccinated against rubella. It also told of the isolation of viruses from the peripheral blood of women with prolonged arthritis following vaccination.(7)

Then, in 2000, CHC’s findings were confirmed by research which showed that polyarthritis and other diseases like amyloidosis, which affects organs in dogs, were linked to the combined vaccine given to dogs.(8) There is a huge body of research, despite the paucity of funding from the vaccine industry, to confirm that vaccines can cause a wide range of brain and central nervous system damage. Merck itself states in its Manual that vaccines (i.e., its own products) can cause encephalitis: brain inflammation/damage. In some cases, encephalitis involves lesions in the brain and throughout the central nervous system. Merck states that “examples are the encephalitides following measles, chickenpox, rubella, smallpox vaccination, vaccinia, and many other less well defined viral infections”.

When the dog owners who took part in the CHC survey reported that their dogs developed short attention spans, 73.1% of the dogs did so within three months of a vaccine event. The same percentage of dogs was diagnosed with epilepsy within three months of a shot (but usually within days). We also found that 72.5% of dogs that were considered by their owners to be nervous and of a worrying disposition, first exhibited these traits within the three-month post-vaccination period.

I would like to add for the sake of Oliver, my friend who suffered from paralysed rear legs and death shortly after a vaccine shot, that “paresis” is listed in Merck’s Manual as a symptom of encephalitis. This is defined as muscular weakness of a neural (brain) origin which involves partial or incomplete paralysis, resulting from lesions at any level of the descending pathway from the brain. Hind limb paralysis is one of the potential consequences. Encephalitis, incidentally, is a disease that can manifest across the scale from mild to severe and can also cause sudden death.

Organ failure must also be suspected when it occurs shortly after a vaccine event. Dr Larry Glickman, who spearheaded the Purdue research into post-vaccination biochemical changes in dogs, wrote in a letter to Cavalier Spaniel breeder Bet Hargreaves:

“Our ongoing studies of dogs show that following routine vaccination, there is a significant rise in the level of antibodies dogs produce against their own tissues. Some of these antibodies have been shown to target the thyroid gland, connective tissue such as that found in the valves of the heart, red blood cells, DNA, etc. I do believe that the heart conditions in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels could be the end result of repeated immunisations by vaccines containing tissue culture contaminants that cause a progressive immune response directed at connective tissue in the heart valves. The clinical manifestations would be more pronounced in dogs that have a genetic predisposition [although] the findings should be generally applicable to all dogs regardless of their breed.”

I must mention here that Dr Glickman believes that vaccines are a necessary evil, but that safer vaccines need to be developed.
read more here (https://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/purdue-vaccination-studies/)

onawah

28th April 2019, 19:10

UPS helps big pharma: Vaccines made ‘easy’ for all adults in their home
by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | April 26, 2019
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccines-ups-2955.html

"(NaturalHealth365) Big Pharma and big government will celebrate the latest news about vaccines. UPS (United Parcel Service) and pharmaceutical conglomerates will likely tout it as a progressive innovation that aims to protect adults and improve public health through such faulty logic as “herd immunity.”

What is this news exactly? In short, it’s a new pilot vaccination project between UPS and vaccine manufacturer Merck. The pilot intends to ship vaccines all over the country and have them administered by “professionals” within your very own home.

Concerned about vaccines? ‘Don’t worry’ says big pharma and UPS, as they roll out plans to make it easier to get vaccinated – but, at what cost?
These days, the world’s largest package delivery service seems all too willing to push their nose into the American people’s private lives and medical decision-making.

According to an article recently published by major news outlet Reuters, “UPS is targeting a larger slice of the $85 billion outsourced healthcare logistics market.” By outsourced, this means “home delivery” health – aka taking the vaccination propaganda on the road.

In other words, UPS will be teaming up with major pharmaceutical powerhouses to get vaccines delivered straight to a person’s very own house – no doubt with the ultimate goal of bringing vaccines past as many thresholds as possible in America.
How is this supposed to work, you may ask? Again from Reuters: “[UPS employees] will package and ship the vaccine to one of the more 4,700 franchised U.S. UPS stores. A home health nurse contracted by UPS’ clinical trial logistics unit known as Marken will collect the insulated package, transport it the ‘last mile’ to the patient’s home and administer the vaccine, which will target a viral illness in adults.”

As for which vaccines will be pushed on the public in this “door-to-door” vaccination initiative, mum’s the word. Either way, this pilot project just screams shady to us. Are we supposed to believe that they’re not going to try to expand this project – to more households and to minors, too?

And how exactly do they plan on vouching for the training and safety of these so-called “professionals” who will be entering strangers homes and injecting these drugs? What are their contingency plans for when things inevitably go wrong – including theft and serious adverse vaccine reactions – and how many US adults will have to play the guinea pigs as they figure this out?

Perhaps most importantly, how will this project accelerate the current state of the U.S. vaccination program – which injures, disables, and kills adults and children every year in this country?

Sending drugs into homes, to be administered by complete strangers – we have to ask, who is actually benefiting from this?
Let us not forget that the pharmaceutical company Merck has a history of ethical digressions – like physician bribery and price fixing, to name just a few. The fact that UPS has eagerly and gleefully teamed up with this organization says a lot about the true intent of this pilot program:

We’ll give you a hint: it’s all about the green paper.

UPS stands to profit immensely from this program. They almost can’t be blamed for scrambling to find ways to boost profits, given the current age we’re in of click-and-purchase from major rival Amazon.

We don’t know…for some reason, the term “mail order drug pushers” keeps popping into our minds. Sadly, we’re starting to think that’s not too harsh."

Sources for this article include:

Reuters.com
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ups-healthcare-focus/ups-eyes-in-home-health-services-with-u-s-vaccine-project-idUSKCN1R30EC
HHS.gov
https://vaers.hhs.gov/

Delight

28th April 2019, 19:15

This from Sherri Tenpenny (hope the drop box link works)

The MMR Vaccine: The Loss Of Future Generations Over An Unrealistic Fear Of Measles (https://www.dropbox.com/s/7m4o0b6zplc2byv/2_Edited_MMR_VACCINE.pdf?dl=0)

Link here https://vaxxter.com/mmr-vaccine-the-loss-of-future-generations-over-an-unrealistic-fear-of-measles/

Delight

28th April 2019, 19:32

This article is from 2016 gives some information of the recent history of california's trail blazing with mandatory vaccination.

Mandatory Vaccinations Means the End of Medical Freedom
November 1, 2016 at 1:39 pm
Written by Shaun Bradley
(https://theantimedia.com/mandatory-vaccinations-medical-freedom/)The Rise of
(ANTIMEDIA Op-Ed) Mandatory vaccinations are about to open up a new frontier for government control. Through the war on drugs, bureaucrats arbitrarily dictate what people can and can’t put into their bodies, but that violation pales in comparison to forcibly medicating millions against their will. Voluntary and informed consent are essential in securing individual rights, and without it, self-ownership will never be respected.

The liberal stronghold of California is trailblazing the encroaching new practice and recently passed laws mandating that children and adults must have certain immunizations before being able to attend schools or work in certain professions. The longstanding religious and philosophical exemptions that protect freedom of choice have been systematically crushed by the state.

California’s Senate Bill 277 went into effect on July 1st, 2016, and marked the most rigid requirements ever instituted for vaccinations. The law forces students to endure a total of 40 doses to complete the 10 federally recommended vaccines while allowing more to be added at any time. Any family that doesn’t go along will have their child barred from attending licensed day care facilities, in-home daycares, public or private schools, and even after school programs.

Over the years, California has developed a reputation for pushing vaccines on their youth. Assembly Bill 499 was passed in 2011 and lowered the age of consent for STD prevention vaccines to just 12 years old. Included in the assortment of shots being administered was the infamous Gardasil, which just a few years later was at the center of a lawsuit that yielded the victims a $6 million settlement from the U.S. government, which paid out funds from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

The Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015 is an attempt to implement this new standard nationwide, and although it has stalled in the House, it will likely be reintroduced the next time the country is gripped by the fear of a pandemic.

The debate surrounding vaccinations is commonly framed as a moral struggle between the benefits to the collective and the selfish preferences of the individual. But since the outbreak scares of Zika, measles, and ebola, the rhetoric has taken a turn toward authoritarianism.

It’s commonly stated by the CDC and most mainstream doctors that the unvaccinated are putting the health of everyone else at risk, but the truth isn’t so black and white. The herd immunity theory has been consistently used to validate the expansion of vaccine programs, but it still doesn’t justify the removal of choice from the individual.

The classic exchange of freedom for perceived safety is a no brainer for the millions of Americans who are willing to use government to strap their neighbors down and forcibly inject them for the greater good. Anyone who expresses concern about possible side effects is immediately branded as conspiratorial or anti-science. Yet controversial claims that certain vaccine variants cause neurological disorders like autism have led some people to swear off inoculations altogether. This all-or-nothing dynamic has completely polarized the issue and prevents any reasonable discussion from taking place. Either you accept all of the CDC’s recommended 69 doses of 16 vaccines between birth and age 18, or you want to bring back measles, polio, and probably the black plague.

On the other extreme side of the debate, if you fail to acknowledge all vaccines as dangerous, you’re an ignorant sheep. Through the internet, disinformation has become widespread and created a movement of people that have written off all the benefits accomplished through immunizations. These individuals are unable or unwilling to separate the science from the shady institutions that develop and distribute new vaccines. Even if thimerosal and mercury based preservatives cause adverse reactions in some patients, it doesn’t detract from the advantages vaccine technology provides. In this debate, like most others in the US, both sides are swept up in emotion and ignorance.

Regardless, the public’s trust in vaccinations has been eroded by the reputations of those companies producing them. Pharmaceutical giants like Merck and Pfizer make billions from the distribution of these shots, and the potential profits after a mandate are enough to corrupt the morals of almost anyone. In one example, former CDC director Dr. Julie Gerberding left her post at the government agency in 2009 to work in Merck’s vaccine division. An investigative report published by the British Medical Journal last year found the CDC downplays its ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Further, by buying the support of politicians like Hillary Clinton — who received more donations from pharmaceutical companies and their employees than any other candidate this year — these huge companies are able to expand their influence in directing government policy.

Maintaining control over what we put into our own bodies is a fundamental right, but for now, standing up to these government decrees only means ostracism from the education system and criticism from peers. In the future, however, the punishments for disobedience will likely only grow stricter.

[revcontent]

An Orange County doctor named Bob Sears is already in the crosshairs of California’s medical board after excusing a two-year-old from future vaccinations. The mother expressed concern that her daughter had an adverse reaction to a previous shot, describing the child as becoming limp “like a ragdoll” for 24 hours after the last dose. Dr. Sears’ alternative treatment recommendations break from the rules dictated by S.B. 277, and now his reputation, as well as his career, are in jeopardy. This new authority to strip doctors of their medical licenses for simply going against the state-imposed standards opens the door for the persecution of medical professionals who resist any government regulation.

A vaccination is an invasive medical procedure that can have different effects on each and every individual. The Nuremberg Code’s first principle is voluntary consent, but it seems the lessons of history have been completely forgotten by today’s leaders. The transition of these shots from “recommended” to “required” is well underway, and those who think the ends justify the means are willing to forcibly make sure everyone else complies.

The new benchmark set by California symbolizes a precedent that could be mimicked across the nation. Without having the discretion to choose which medications are injected into your body — or your child’s — how can anyone convince themselves they are free? This overreach and collusion can often be dismissed as a trivial issue, but the fact that voluntary consent is under attack speaks volumes to the extent that state power has metastasized.

Delight

28th April 2019, 23:44

I read comments on articles because they often tell me much. This was a relatively mild article that just suggested, even if vaccine skeptics are mistaken, the way to approach the issue is to stop calling them crazy.

OPINION
Stop telling anti-vaxxers they’re insane for questioning vaccines | Opinion
Updated: March 28, 2019 - 11:38 AM
Bernice Hausman, for the Philly Inquirer (https://www.philly.com/opinion/commentary/anti-vaccine-vaxxer-movement-parents-judgment-20190328.html)

The comments become very inflamed. Assuming these are real people with real concern, resistance to vaccination is creating self-righteous anger against refusers. In several comments, vaccine hesitancy is conflated with conspiracy theory and flat earth beliefs. Vaccine skepticism is equated with being selfish as one's personal vaccine status is seen to impinge on everyone's health.

The belief that vaccines will eliminate the disease and is vital is well entrenched.

this is a weird mirror of my points about "immunity to facts". I feel gaslighted reading it.

Anti-vaccination folks are immune to facts that contradict their preconceived ideas about conspiracy (scientists, companies, or governments), misunderstanding of how immunity is acquired, and miscalculation of risk versus benefit.

Public Health often operates with the belief that providing information will change behavior. Research shows anti-vaxx people are not affected by teaching of facts. There is no fact that will change their minds. Conspiracy beliefs are powerful and rooted in self-esteem issues. "I have special knowledge that most do not, therefore you should listen to me".

So far there is no research I can find that shows any method will change the minds of antivaxxers. Often the only thing that does is a local outbreak or infection of a loved one. Parents watching their child struggle for breath with whooping cough suddenly don't see risk/benefit ratio in the same way.

Frankly, only mandatory vaccination seems to work to help achieve a high enough level of protection for a population.

Several comments attack the writer and her credentials, as one is not allowed to have an informed opinion unless the name is followed by the RIGHT credentials.

This is one more example of the shoddy "journalism" espoused by The Inquirer these days.
It's frightening that a person can publish an "opinion" article with absolutely no reference to their credentials.
Who is Bernice Hausman?
What relative or friend of hers gave her opinions access to this news source?
Is she a member of a cult?
Is she a witch doctor?
If the subject were trivial I might not object - but it's anything but trivial.
It's about life and death...

Other comments proclaim unequivocal precedence of PUBLIC concerns over private PERIOD.

When Ms. Hausman says there is no room for alternative belief systems, she must be referring to belief systems that don't rely on evidence or explanation. Why should we tolerate false beliefs that put the public at risk? This is a public health issue, not some esoteric political debate.

Dear Dr. Hausman,

I read your article in the Philadelphia Inquirer and to say I disagree is probably a large understatement. If you want to reframe the conversation about vaccination, you can do so by telling these anti-vaccination types or vaccine hesitant parents that it is a societal responsibility to vaccinate and NOT by poking holes in arguments that already carry significant weight.

I’ll start with your point that measles were declared eliminated in 2000. This does not mean that there would be no cases within the nation’s borders. While you correctly point out that immigrants bring measles with them, you fail to mention the key and important point that herd immunity is most effective at vaccine rates at or above 95%. By allowing the vaccination rates in the USA to hover below that rate we invite contagion into the masses.

Scientific evidence is NOT the only reason vaccinate. Society has deemed it necessary and reasonable to vaccinate for the needs of the many. The thoughts of a few individuals have no bearing in this discussion.By refusing vaccination these people transfer the risk of getting disease and reaping no benefit from assuming the societal responsibility to vaccinate back onto people who have already accepted the risk inherent to vaccination. That is entirely unfair to the bulk of us.

Your argument is quite frankly irresponsible by someone who is on staff at the Pennsylvania State College of Medicine. If you want to espouse these views, you should do so without mentioned your association with a medical institution.

Despite information that I have read which shows that the idea of "herd immunity" is a fallacy, people have especially become convinced that sufficient vaccination means sufficient immunity to protect everyone. They think this end justifies any means. This belief seems the big one to justify attack on all who disagree?

onawah

29th April 2019, 00:51

This problem is much worse than the ET Disclosure one, imho, because the threat is immediate and affects everyone, in one way or the other, not just in terms of health, but of basic human rights.
It seems that until it becomes clear to everyone that government agencies like the FDA and CDC are corrupt beyond almost everyone's current ability to comprehend, this standoff will continue, though I hope for something to end it soon.
I have a fantasy about how great it would be if some researcher developed a Rife technology-based device that would heal most ills with the proper frequencies, and a benevolent billionaire would build clinics worldwide, making treatments readily available.
And then the devices would become so cheap and easy to manufacture that they would be available to all.
Good theme for a sci-fi book.

ThePythonicCow

29th April 2019, 02:36

Both are IMO really important. They demonstrate the recent climate of PROPAGANDA, LIES and CRAVEN disregard for our right to informed consent. IMO this is NOT just about the shot in the arm, despite unquestionable individual (and MAYBE collective) harm. IMO it is a shot across the bow of the ship of individual sovereign rights. IMO but not alone in this opinion.
Like most major operations of the Elite Bastards, the push to inject the masses with more and more vaccines under increasingly Draconian mandates serves multiple purposes:

Profits for Big Pharma, one of the tentacles of the Elite Bastards
Weaken, even disable, many of us non-elite humans
One more issue for us non-elite humans to fight each other about
Delivery vehicle for weaponized injections
One more means to enrage and frighten us non-elite humans
Further extend the tyranny of the Elite Bastards over the sovereignty of the individual

Vive la résistance!

Hervé

29th April 2019, 10:00

Something like this needs to happen:

[...]
At night, the great removal. The two men who thought themselves masters of the world, brought before the tribunal on the largest square in the world, before men of the earth and pursued by those who have rebelled. Scientists condemned by them to slavery through their power, to put their talents at the service of death, will be the accusers.

Then will be the turn of the persecuted. Terrible will be the conviction and Man will find himself in the embrace between science and faith.

The proceedings of the trial will be the poem of the people, and the lyrics are sweet to the lowly, terrible for the arrogant powers.

The dispatched armies stopped at the boundaries of the square and the men-soldiers turned their weapons around. Weapons are defeated that day. Those of the earth, those of the sky.

[...]

Related:
When Vested Interests Take Education over... (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?89230-When-Vested-Interests-Take-Education-over...&p=1288785#post1288785)

Hervé

29th April 2019, 13:11

Quarantined US Navy Ship Destroys “Herd Immunity” Myth (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMcV5214MZ8)

wMcV5214MZ8

https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AAuE7mDtV5KswnTleSBpi9VYHvcQ93rdK1W3TD0yuA=s48-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFtfoXI8qQfLZKFirWjdbqw)Baked Blunts (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFtfoXI8qQfLZKFirWjdbqw)
Published on Apr 24, 2019

Why has a US Navy ship been quarantined at sea for months with a mumps outbreak when 100% of the sailors & marines have been vaccinated at least once? With politicians and BigPharma pushing mandatory vaccines, it’s an important lesson.

Delight

29th April 2019, 15:21

:dog::dog::dog:
Something like this needs to happen:

[...]
At night, the great removal. The two men who thought themselves masters of the world, brought before the tribunal on the largest square in the world, before men of the earth and pursued by those who have rebelled. Scientists condemned by them to slavery through their power, to put their talents at the service of death, will be the accusers.

Then will be the turn of the persecuted. Terrible will be the conviction and Man will find himself in the embrace between science and faith.

The proceedings of the trial will be the poem of the people, and the lyrics are sweet to the lowly, terrible for the arrogant powers.

The dispatched armies stopped at the boundaries of the square and the men-soldiers turned their weapons around. Weapons are defeated that day. Those of the earth, those of the sky.

[...]

I do SO pray that this prophecy is true. I went to the linked post and looked for "The Prophecies of Pope John XXIII." It does not seem to be in English. Thanks for sharing them again.

Delight

29th April 2019, 15:59

Delight

29th April 2019, 16:32

A bigger picture

YOUR BODY IS NOT A DRUG
On May 9th, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit at the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) against stem cell clinics currently performing surgical procedures involving autologous adipose tissue.

According to the FDA and the DOJ, even if this procedure is in the patient’s best interest and can improve their quality of life, they are no longer legally allowed to undergo such treatment.

If the FDA prevails in its attempt to stop physicians in the United States from performing these life-changing stem cell procedures, the thousands of patients nationwide who have benefitted from this holistic therapy will be the last to do so, and subsequent treatments will return to offshore clinics. This will greatly reduce the number of patients who can afford these kinds of life-changing therapies and will force autologous, adipose stem cell treatments back into the dark ages. (https://mycellsmychoice.org)

The David Knight Show
Published on Apr 26, 2019
Lori Gregory and Dr. Kristin Comella, world-renowned expert on regenerative medicine using a patient’s own stem cells join to talk about the federal government’s unprecedented attempt to regulate our bodies. This new treatment holds amazing potential, which is why government & industry want to control your body, your healthcare, your informed choice and your liberty.

ddOGkMiAc00

PiCW4z7j0ww

Sandy123

29th April 2019, 17:23

Bob

29th April 2019, 18:22

Delight

29th April 2019, 18:44

I am actively campaigning against vaccine wherever I get a chance. Say every time I see a baby or child with their parents. A number have thanked me outright for the tip. This is the best thing we can do. To spread awareness. There should be enough number of people if we are to defeat this mandatory BS.

You should also look at the new wrecker, new born screening.

The pro vaccine people trust their gov't and MSN. These people are rabid to attack the anti vaxers. I think somewhere deep down they can't admit there is such evil among us. Do they not know how to read or research on their own. So how about we make a list up of all the instances where our gov't experimented on our own. There's the syphilis given to people of color. I think there are 2 where they sprayed neighborhoods claiming it was for mosquitoes. I'm sure there are more intentional cases that are well documented.
I still think the Zika virus was caused by spraying or vaccines. I wonder why that debacle died down - because new and better propaganda like the Presidential elections came up?

I agree that it is very painful to admit the degree of evil evidenced. I also think that we have been generationally conditioned to believe that vaccines have saved us from small pox and polio. There is a fear deeply embedded... that SOMETHING is waiting to attack us in the microbial world. What I had not thought about is a subtle belief that we should never be "sickened" by microbes (that we have the right to never contract a communicable diseas).

This idea that we must protect at all costs from ever contracting a disease is a basic error IMO. The body immune system in its natural state is one which strengthens by our contact with micriobes. In fact, the body is actually a physical community of symbiotic microbes. Everything has its place.

I know from my research that in FACT, in the presence of sound nutrition and in a state of low stress, the more microbes we encounter the better!

Dr. Humphries in one interview talks about the changes in social structure in England when people were forced off the land to be crowded into industrial cities. People lost access to nutritional food, were forced into crowded conditions, forced to breathe polluted air, had no basic sanitation, were made to work long grueling hours and on and on concerning the loss of HYGIENE.

Then the populace had epidemics. You can see something similar in the cases of large numbers of homeless getting sick in large cities. You see it in any case where people are forced to give up HUMANE conditions.

I think communicable disease is an opportunistic situation that occurs in conditions where nature is perverted and the environment is such that people become ill. We can look at a few sectors of people like the Amish to see how health is not mysterious. This article is indicative and IMO overstates the issue of heart disease.

Amish People Stay Healthy in Old Age. Here's Their Secret (http://time.com/5159857/amish-people-stay-healthy-in-old-age-heres-their-secret/)

Illustration by Pete Ryan for TIME
BY JEFFREY KLUGER
FEBRUARY 15, 2018
Many people think of the Amish as living without. These devout communities, predominantly located in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Indiana, go without cars, TVs, computers, phones or even the electricity needed to run so much of 21st century gadgetry. But what researchers who have studied them have found is what the Amish have a surplus of: good health in late life. The average American life expectancy is currently just under 79 years. Back in 1900, it was only 47, but for early–20th century Amish it was already greater than 70. Over the decades, most Americans have caught up in overall life expectancy, but the Amish still have a significant edge in late-life health, with lower rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and more. So how do they do it?

Start with lifestyle. Amish communities are agrarian, with no modern farm equipment, meaning all the work has to be done by hand. In 2004, the American College of Sports Medicine fitted Amish volunteers with pedometers to determine how much physical activity they performed. The results were dramatic. Amish men took 18,425 steps a day and women 14,196 steps, compared with non-Amish people who are encouraged by doctors to shoot for at least 10,000 steps–and typically fail. Including other forms of manual labor–lifting, chopping, sowing, planting–the Amish are six times as active as a random sample of people from 12 countries.

One result of this is that only about 4% of Amish people are obese, compared with 36.5% of the overall U.S. population. Amish children are about one-third as likely as non-Amish to be obese, according to a 2012 study in PLOS One. This means 50% lower rates of Type 2 diabetes.

The near absence of tobacco in the Amish community–some men do smoke cigars–results in a 63% lower rate of tobacco-related cancers, according to a 2004 study of Ohio’s Amish population. The Amish also had rates of all cancers that were 40% lower than the rest of the Ohio population.

Cardiovascular disease is one area in which the Amish don’t have an edge, with blood-pressure and heart-disease rates slightly higher than those of other populations. Some of this might be attributable to the Amish diet, which is heavy on pancakes, eggs and sausage for breakfast; and meat, potatoes, gravy and bread for dinner. Working the farm can burn off those calories, but all the fat and salt and carbs still take a toll.

The most powerful weapon in the Amish long-life arsenal, however, may be genes. The Amish population in the U.S. is about 318,000, descended from just 200 families that immigrated in the 1700s. They mostly marry within their own communities, which means the genes that existed when their ancestors got to America have remained. That can be a dangerous thing if bad genes are hidden in the mix but a good thing if the genes are sound. While no community is without genetic problems, the Amish seem to have gotten a lucky draw.

In a study released last November, researchers at Northwestern University announced the discovery of a gene in an Amish community that seemed to be associated with an average life span 10% longer than that of people without the gene. The long-lived subjects also had 10% longer telomeres–the caps at the end of chromosomes that shorten over time and drive the aging process. The gene, known as PAI-1, is linked not only to slower aging but also to better insulin levels and better blood pressure and arterial flexibility.

Not all Amish have the PAI-1 mutation; it has been found so far in just one community in Indiana. But those who do carry it have an additional edge over and above the one they have simply from being born Amish.

While much of the Amish advantage is unique to the Amish themselves, there is one long-life lesson they can teach everyone else. Almost all elderly people in the Amish community are cared for at home, by relatives. This isn’t always realistic or possible in the non-Amish world, but when it is, it pays huge health dividends. The PLOS One study estimated that aging in place has the same longevity benefits as quitting smoking. In all communities, it seems, the power of family may trump the power of medicine.

Write to Jeffrey Kluger at jeffrey.kluger@time.com.

And though there may have been a genetic mutation, Epigenetics has demonstrated that genes turn on and off with changes in the environment AND quite quickly

I disagree about the Amish advantage being about genetics... it is IMO EPIGENETIC.

Amish study sheds light on heart disease
By GINA KOLATANOV. 12, 2008

For the sake of heart disease research, 809 members of the Old Order Amish community agreed to go to a clinic in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, near their homes, and drink a rich milkshake that was made mostly of heavy cream. Over the next six hours, a group of investigators took samples of their blood, determining how much fat was churning through their bloodstreams.

Most of the study participants responded as expected - their levels of triglycerides, a common form of fat in the blood, rose steadily for three to four hours and then declined. But about 5 percent had an extraordinary reaction: Their triglyceride levels started out low and hardly budged.

It turns out, the researchers report in the Friday issue of the journal Science, that those individuals who barely responded have a mutation that disables one of their two copies of a gene called apoC-III. The gene codes for a protein, APOC3, that normally slows the breakdown of triglycerides.

With the mutated gene, people break down triglycerides unusually quickly. And, the investigators find, they also have low levels of LDL cholesterol, which at high levels increases heart disease risk. They have high levels of HDL cholesterol, which is associated with a decreased risk of heart disease. And they appear to have arteries relatively clear of plaque.

To find the gene mutation, the researchers, led by Toni Pollin, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, scanned the entire genomes of their study subjects, looking for genetic regions that were linked to levels of blood triglycerides.

That led them to a region containing the apoC-III gene. When they sequenced it, they found the mutation that destroyed its function.

Dr. Alan Shuldiner, head of the division of endocrinology, diabetes and nutrition at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore and the senior author of the paper, said the Amish were ideal for the study because they were an isolated population that had been in the United States for 14 generations and whose members shared many genes.

In this case, Pollin said, she and her colleagues traced the apoC-III mutation to a member of the Amish community who was born in the 18th century.

The gene is also regulated by insulin, noted Dr. Daniel Rader, a heart disease researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, and people with diabetes have high levels of APOC3, high levels of triglycerides and an increased risk of heart disease.

The discovery of the gene mutation, researchers say, helps bolster the case that triglycerides are related to risk of heart disease and that APOC3 is an important contributor. But clinical applications may be years away.

Dr. Ira Goldberg, chief of the division of preventive medicine and nutrition at Columbia University, said the triglyceride case had mostly rested on studies showing an association between high triglyceride levels and an increased incidence of heart disease. But that, Goldberg added, is not cause and effect. The new study provides more direct evidence.

"Here we have a group of people with a genetic mutation that lowers triglycerides," Goldberg said. "They seem to have less cardiovascular disease."

As for apoC-III, the study clarifies its role, said Dr. Alan Tall, head of the molecular medicine division at Columbia. "It was known from animal studies that apoC-III might have a role like this," Tall said. "But the human information is really novel. We suspected it might be the case but this nails it down."

Rader agreed. "This is among the strongest human evidence we have that APOC3 is quote, unquote, bad," he said. "If you had a drug to turn off the gene to prevent as much APOC3 being made, this study suggests that that would be beneficial to do."

But he added that there were no such drugs on the immediate horizon.
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/world/americas/12iht-heart.4.18639873.html

Today in the industrialized world we have extreme stress and chronic exposure to assailing factors LIKE vaccines. Dr. Humphries is an excellent resource articulating the factors that begin at birth in the corporatocracy take over of our lifestyle. Chronic disease is a much bigger issue than communicable disease.

AFnh06drH48

It is more clear all the time that we are being poisoned by the lifestyles we have adopted because we believed they are improvements. That is a hard pill to swallow. People have been shown to deny what is overwhelming to the cognitive landscape. The cognitive dissonance continues until the person has less to lose by taking on a new set of information than clinging to the old IMO.

Information that empowers us to take things into our own hands regarding health is one way to shift POV. I wonder what we can do to assert our power to REFUSE further assault? One thing is by beginning to talk to everyone we know armed with true information.

Maybe the reason I am most focused on vaccination is because of the fact that IMO we must band together and stop MANDATORY vaccination. Where there is choice, there is a chance to change our minds. I am certain we are spiritual beings but subscribe to no religion.

However, I think that asserting religious freedom is something we can use to fight the seeming tide of horrors, or maybe not? Now, religious organizations seem to be unconcerned once children are born? Then the belief kicks in that public "health" is about everyone being vaccinated.

It hurts to be aware that maybe there is more danger from other humans than from microbes.

Delight

29th April 2019, 19:44

Can anybody on this thread talk about what is happening in LA with measles?

Here are some talking points to consider:

Like can anyone address that unvax'd people maybe getting measles? What strain are they getting?

Has measles been weaponized?

All the dialogue on the thread thus far has been very interesting and very informative, but I really would like to hear about the current state of affairs with what virus is hitting LA.

I was just aware of a virus hitting a friend in Boulder that required glandular removal because it was harming breathing. It was not strep but viral.

Thanks group.

Was it like a viral tonsillitis? I have heard of that issue in adults.

I am aware of no information about which measles strains are are infecting unvaccinated people and not sure how to find it?

This was odd IMO...
In Oregon, Dr. Paul Thomas tried to report a case of possible measles and was told not to send in a sample of blood for testing. This was at the high point of the measles "epidemic".

Find it here after 20:15
d-TPQfHkxVs

In the Ukraine, a measles vaccine push was correlated with increased measles outbreak and when tested, the lab confirmed wild strain measles was seen to be much less than the total measles cases that MDs saw in clinic? The presence of an attenuated strain is not discussed in the graph.

https://stichtingvaccinvrij.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Screen-Shot-2018-05-10-at-17.48.57.png

Outbreak of over 12,000 cases of measles in Ukraine is caused by recent vaccination campaign?!
© Mara Gabriëlle, Daphne Knipping and Door Frankema
12 May 2018 (https://stichtingvaccinvrij.nl/outbreak-of-over-12000-cases-of-measles-in-ukraine-is-caused-by-recent-vaccination-campaign/)

This CDC article does not reveal any attenuated measles strains detected in recent outbreaks. But why would CDC report that anyway if they are mostly concerned with scares of wild measles?

Measles Cases and Outbreaks

Measles Cases in 2019 (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html)

By the way....
The CDC does not consider post vaccination symptoms "the Measles".

APRIL 04, 2019
Measles, Measles, Everywhere! (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines/measles-measles-everywhere/)

Vaccine-induced vs. vaccine-preventable
While the measles five-alarm is ringing, it is worth looking into the peer-reviewed, published medical literature about recent infections. The funny thing is that there are hundreds of documented cases – maybe thousands undocumented — of measles going unreported to the CDC every year. Not secret cases of feverish children with mottled rashes, hidden away in the houses of Orthodox Jews or anti-vaxxer wellness types. No. Thousands of kids, show up in emergency rooms and clinics across the nation with spiking fevers, rashes and seizures caused by measles virus. The medical literature describes their illness as “clinically indistinguishable” from wild-type measles but it is caused by a vaccine virus.

“Vaccine- Associated Rash Illness” looks so much like wild measles that parents go in droves to emergency rooms, usually seven to 12 days after a shot. Even doctors have to be educated to distinguish “vaccine-associated measles” from “vaccine-preventable” measles. The only accurate way to do this is by genotyping the virus using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Good thing we can do that, right? Except that doctors are told not to do PCR tests on children with measles who were recently vaccinated. Public health agencies tell doctors that they must report every case of measles – unless it is in children (or adults) who were recently vaccinated.

ER visits
It’s true, public health agencies tell parents to expect loss of appetite, mild fever and rash — “a mild form of measles” — seven to 12 days after a measles injection. But for many, many children the reaction is not mild. One study, published in 2017 in Vaccine (the journal of the vaccine industry) found that 7,480 (0.8 percent) of 946,806 American babies — that’s approaching one in 100 — who had recently received a first shot of MMR or MMRV between 2000 and 2012 were taken to an emergency room or clinic and had a “medically-attended” fever 7 to 10 days later. The study excluded children in hospital earlier than day 7 as well as children who spiked fevers beyond day 10, so actual hospital visits for vaccine fevers is under-reported. This was not an expected vaccine reaction, the researchers said, but “considered an adverse event” to immunization and the study was trying to distinguish those children, clumped in certain genetic families it turns out, who are vulnerable to the reaction so that vaccines could one day be “personalized.” So, if vaccine researchers have found that some kids react differently to vaccines in a bad way than others, should county executives be issuing mandates that all children must be vaccinated? One shot clearly does not fit all.

An earlier study from Canada also found that one in every 168 babies end up at an ER within two weeks of a measles shot. That’s a lot higher than the one-in-a-million vaccine risk that parents are told about, isn’t it? The study said the babies were seen mostly for spiking fevers, rashes and seizures. The CDC recognizes an increased risk of seizures after vaccines, including the MMR. Parents take seizures seriously. Maybe they’d be inclined to join the growing ranks of “anti-vaxxers” who don’t want to take any risk – no matter how small the CDC thinks it is –of seizures in their healthy baby.

Delight

29th April 2019, 20:29

Status RI H7704 | 2018
....Introduced on February 28 2018 - 25% progression, died in committee
Action: 2018-03-28 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Pending: House Health, Education and Welfare Committee
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF] (https://legiscan.com/RI/text/H7704/2018)

Summary
Requires informed consent for mandatory vaccines

A physician regarding informed consent bill H7704 states it is just too time consuming. His nonchalant arrogance is amazing!

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=347953222278937

https://www.facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice/videos/vb.120381895036072/349270005480592/?type=2&theater

WOW... at least some people spoke up in Rhode Island. Here is a comment from a viewer of the videos

I guess he doesn't have the intelligence to figure out that he could inform those who are scheduled to see him for vaccines by newsletter or information sheet with the known side effects, up to and including death, prior to their scheduled visit. Pediatricians don't have time for that? Sad that too many of them are in it only for the money and could care less about what happens to your child. I wonder if they inform their own family. If they don't have time for you, you shouldn't have time for them. Remember, it's your life and your family - please do your own research from independent sources prior to seeing any medical person (I didn't say "doctor" because some of them don't deserve that title).

Delight

29th April 2019, 21:14

Some things are just so hurtful that one cannot stop ranting.

Edward Bernays, Corporate Pseudo-Science and the 2017 March for Science
Thursday Apr. 27th, 2017Gary G. Kohls, MD

Propaganda definition: “a message designed to persuade its intended audience to think and behave in a certain manner. Thus advertising is commercial propaganda. Or institutionalized and systematic spreading of information and/or disinformation, usually to promote a narrow political or religious (or commercial) viewpoint.” -- from http://www.businessdictionary.com/

Mercenary definition: ”a person primarily concerned with making money at the expense of ethics.”
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind.” -- Edward L. Bernays, the Father of Propaganda in America and Sigmund Freud’s nephew, from his seminal book Propaganda (1928).

“Entire populations, which were undisciplined or lacking in intellectual or definite moral principles, were vulnerable to unconscious influence and thus susceptible to wanting things that they do not need. This is achieved by manipulating desires on an unconscious level.” – Edward Bernays, From the Annals of the American Academy of Poliltical and Social Science (March 1947)

I recently heard a talk given by the author of a book whose theme was “the war on science”. The author happened to be on the national steering committee that helped to organize last weekend’s March for Science. The author was not a scientist, but he appeared to be fairly well read about some of the issues about which I was also concerned, such as global warming, resource depletion, pollution, over-population and other highly probable environmental catastrophes.

....................

However, during the speech, I was disappointed to hear the author boldly state as fact a widely-propagated media, medical and pharmaceutical industry myth that falsely claims that vaccines (presumably including the 270 new experimental ones that are in Big Pharma’s pipeline) are totally safe and efficacious (when they are injected into the muscle tissue of tiny, even premature infants whose blood-brain barriers and immune systems are not yet developed enough to keep out the mercury, aluminum and live viruses).

Obviously, unbeknownst to this non-scientist author, his statement revealed that he was ignorant or otherwise unaware of the voluminous body of documented, peer-reviewed and unbiased neuroscientific evidence that refutes the oft-repeated claim – or perhaps it just revealed the success of the indoctrination process that he and so many others, including far too many health journalists, had heard again and again. One only needs to recall Goebbels dictum: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it as truth.” (For that evidence that refutes the lie about vaccine safety, go to https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/replay/; www.nvic.org; http://vaxxedthemovie.com/; www.vactruth.com; http://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com; http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/learn-more/science/.)

The Fluoridation of America’s Water Supplies

The author also disappointed me when he repeated the American Dental Association-propagated (and fluoride industry) myth that the widespread fluoridation of municipal water supplies with the hazardous waste by-product of the fertilizer industry (fluoride) has no downsides (implying that fluoride supplementation is totally safe for the bodies and brains of children, notwithstanding the documented proof that the ingestion of that neurotoxic mineral can cause lowered IQ levels, hypothyroidism and brain damage, as well as fluorosis of bones and teeth.

The statement also ignored the fact that the fertilizer industry’s waste products contain an variable combination of fluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate and sodium fluoride, in addition to untested-for-contaminants like arsenic. It is important to note that fluoridation of water supplies is banned in most municipalities in Europe (on the basis of good, unbiased science), with no evidence of any increase in the incidence of dental caries in those non-fluoridated communities. (Explore www.fluoridealert.org for much more - and also read the warning on the next tube of fluoridated Crest toothpaste that you can find on the grocery store shelf.)

Edward Bernays, the Father of American Propagnda

Edward Bernays is considered the Father of American Propaganda. His writings on propaganda inspired Nazi Party leader Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment to be really good at his job. One of Bernay’s most influential corporate” accomplishments” occurred in the mid- to late-1940s, when he was hired by ALCOA (the Aluminum Company of America) to orchestrate a public relations campaign to convince political leaders and the public that it would be good if ALCOA’s highly toxic by-product (fluoride salts) were added to the nation’s drinking water supplies under the guise of preventing tooth decay in children. (Google “Edward Bernays, the Father of American Propaganda” and “A Chronology of Forced Fluoridation in America” for more.)

Bernays’ propaganda campaign worked like a charm, with many state legislatures (including my state of Minnesota) passing laws that compelled reluctant municipalities to fluoridate their water supplies with the waste product that had up until then been responsible for so much poisoned air, water, soil, food, vegetation, livestock and other living things surrounding ALCOA’s aluminum smelting plants.

The aluminum industry, with the help of the American Dental Association (which is still in denial about the serious neurotoxicity of the mercury in its dental “amalgam” fillings), was enabled to sell its otherwise unmarketable and poisonous by-product - and they made a profit to boot! Win-win-lose.
Bernays’ and ALCOA’s fluoride caper was just another example of how cunning mercenary lobbyists that work for sociopathic corporations can convince non-scientist legislators to do their bidding, especially if the politicians also accept campaign contributions from those often criminal enterprises! (It should be noted, by the way, that, in recent years, most of the highly caustic fluoride powder that is purchased by American municipalities like Duluth comes from the toxic smokestacks of the phosphate fertilizer industry [rather than from the aluminum industry] and that the handlers of the fluoride powder need to wear hazmat suits.)

It is obvious to any close observer of what industry calls “science” is that there are at least two types of science:
1) the biased, Big Business kind of science that hires well-trained scientists to perform the necessary research in order to develop products that will make money for the company and its investors, and
2) the unbiased kind of science that is in it for altruistic reasons – with scientists that work for the advancement of pure knowledge, the advancement of society and the creation of a more humane and prosperous world for everybody – hoping, of course, to make a decent living at the same time.

The first kind of science – the one that has been dominant in American society for far too long - must be regarded with extreme suspicion, for it hires scientists that are expected do the will of the corporation’s non-scientist management and marketing teams that may be serial liars and manipulators of statistics. Far too often – because of the intense competition, corporations find themselves unable to afford following ethical principles other than the so-called “business ethics” (an oxymoron) that they may have learned in the business administration course they once took in school.

Mercenaries, Whether Scientists or Soldiers, Can’t be Trusted to do the Honorable Thing
continued here (http://duluthreader.com/articles/2017/04/26/9921_edward_bernays_corporate_pseudo_science_and_the)

Delight

29th April 2019, 21:21

This article by Gary Kohls MD has important questions for parents to ask THEMSELVES, for all of us to ask OURSELVES.

What are we willing to allow into our experience and what will we do to resist?

A Few Important Questions that Parents need to Ask Before Giving Consent for the Next Round of Big Pharma-recommended Vaccinations
(Big Pharma corporations, it must be remembered, are the untrustworthy, unindicted criminal cartel that brought us the Opioid Crisis)
Thursday Apr. 18th, 2019

There are a few important questions that all parents of “vaccine-eligible” infants and children deserve to have answered before they allow their children to get the next CDC-recommended batch of vaccinations. Most parents have not been allowed to see, read or understand the negative information about vaccines that would naturally make them “hesitant” to proceed with allowing their child to receive the Big Pharma and CDC-recommended schedule that has never been fully proven to be either safe or effective long-term.

Those of us in the Anti-Over-Vaccination Resistance Movement have been gauged to have been “too effective” (for Big Pharma’s tastes) in proving to “reality-based” parents that over-vaccinating their infants and children with neurotoxic and/or auto-immunity-inducing vaccines isn’t a good idea. Apparently, the Anti-Over-Vaccination movement’s sound science-based writings, lectures, videos and conferences have been too effective at refuting the propaganda that is being constantly trumpeted by the for-profit corporations that make up Big Pharma, Big Medicine, Big Government, Big Media and Wall Street. The Big Business indoctrination campaigns that claim that all vaccines are 100% safe, 100%: effective and 100% necessary are now being understood by most of the American population to have been lies.

And so, as always happens when propaganda or advertising campaigns by the rich and powerful fail to convince prospective believers or prospective customers, the propagandists start resorting to libel, slander, censorship, ridicule and even adolescent name-calling (especially in the case of corporate-paid internet trolls) to “win” the battle against the truth-tellers who are pointing out why “vaccine hesitancy” makes total sense to “reality-based” parents who are given the opportunity to think for themselves.

All of our movement’s efforts at truth-telling about vaccine safety issues are being increasingly censored out of existence by recent figurative “book-burnings” by social media entities like Face Book, YouTube, Google, Pinterest, Amazon, etc. that have, accompanied by threats from governmental agencies and the eager assistance of their cohorts in Big Pharma, Big Medicine and Big Media. When truth is a danger to the power elite in any given culture, that culture is drifting toward fascism. Fascist countries, of course, are led by anti-democratic, pro-violence, conscienceless leaders that meet the definition of “sociopathic entities” who routinely lie and therefore can never be trusted.

Here are Four Important Questions to get Answers to Before Continuing the Over-vaccinating of Your Child

Question #1: Have you or anybody that you have heard about ever experienced these symptoms after being vaccinated? Myalgia (muscle pain), myositis, muscle weakness, arthralgia (joint pain), arthritis, chronic fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairment, chronic headache or memory loss. (The onset of these symptoms may have been either acute or delayed by weeks or months after the inoculations. Note that this is just a short list of autoimmune symptoms and signs.)

Question # 2: Do you know any fully vaccinated people that have suffered any of the following disorders that actually may have been undiagnosed, preventable, iatrogenic, aluminum-adjuvanted, vaccine-induced autoimmune disorders? (Note that a failure to accurately diagnose the cause of vaccine-induced disorders will invariably mean that appropriate treatment [and prevention of future sicknesses as well] will be erroneous.).

Here is a short list of disorders that can be vaccine-induced: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), diabetes mellitus (type 1), Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (SLE), demyelinating neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), vasculitis, dermatomyositis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD), Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), Macrophagic Myofasciitis Syndrome (MMF), Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC), Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases (AITD), Addisonian crisis and thyroid storm, ASIA, et, etc.

Question # 3: Would you as a parent prefer having your child go through a benign and transient viral illness such as measles, mumps, rubella or chicken pox (illnesses that would actually give the child life-long immunity with no need for booster shots [as opposed to fully vaccinated children that will “need” to be re-vaccinated over and over again to just maintain their theoretical partial serological immunity])?

Question #4: Or are you willing to take the very real risk of allowing your child to come down with (for example): vaccine-induced sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), near-SIDS, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, vaccine-induced encephalopathy, vaccine-induced neurodevelopmental disorders, vaccine-induced learning disorders, an autism spectrum disorder, so-called attention/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), aluminum adjuvant-induced diabetes mellitus type 1, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis or any of the many other life-long, chronic, aluminum-adjuvant-induced autoimmune disorders listed above and below that could cause your child to become a chronically ill patient that will be dependent on medical care and prescription drugs for the rest of his/her life?

The level of alarm that should be generated as you seek responses to the above questions will reveal how mis-informed and even dis-informed you and your physicians have become, thanks to the profit-motivated entities within Big Pharma and Big Medicine (including the AAP, the AMA, the AAFP, the CDC, the FDA and the NIH). Consider this summary statement concerning the many still-unrecognized contraindications to future vaccinations in certain cases. It comes from Dr Yehuda Shoenfeld, the “Godfather of Autoimmunology”):

“It seems preferable that individuals with prior autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same type of vaccine.” “Whoever Pays the Piper, Calls the Tune”

Big Media, which derives 70% of its revenues from Big Pharma’s (often viewed as unethical) direct-to-consumer advertising, has collaborated with Big Pharma in creating a web of lies and disinformation. This incestuous relationship has effectively silenced investigative journalists and columnists from doing the job that made them go into the profession, http://duluthreader.com/articles/2019/04/18/16726_a_few_important_questions_that_parents_need_to_ask

Delight

29th April 2019, 22:14

addressing the theory of Natural Immunity and Vaccination

Dr Tetyana Obukhanych focusing on measles

Dr Tetyana Obukhanych is the author of Vaccine Illusion: How Vaccination Compromises Our Natural Immunity and What We Can Do to Regain Our Health. In her book, she presents a view on vaccination that is radically different from mainstream theories.
Dr Tetyana Obukhanych, has studied immunology in some of the world's most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. and Stanford University in California.

8h66beBrEpk

‘Herd Immunity’: the misplaced driver of universal vaccination (https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/about-vaccines/general-issues/herd-immunity/herd-immunity-the-misplaced-driver-of-universal-vaccination/)

The term, ‘herd immunity’, was coined by researcher, A W Hedrich, after he’d studied the epidemiology of measles in USA between 1900-1931. His study published in the May, 1933 American Journal of Epidemiology concluded that when 68% of children younger than 15 yrs old had become immune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased. For several reasons, this natural, pre-vaccine herd immunity differed greatly from today’s vaccine ‘herd immunity’.1,2

When immunity was derived from natural infection, a much smaller proportion of the population needed to become immune to show the herd effect; compare the 68% measles immunity required for natural herd immunity to the very high percentages of vaccine uptake deemed necessary for measles vaccine ‘herd immunity’. In his ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’, Neil Z Miller cites research which concluded increasing vaccine uptake necessary for ‘herd immunity’ ranging from “70 to 80 percent of two year olds in inner cities” in 1991 to “‘close to 100 percent coverage’…with a vaccine that is 90 to 98 percent effective.” in 1997. Miller notes that, “When the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, officials were confident that they could eradicate the disease by 1967.”

Subsequently, new dates for eradication were pronounced as 1982, 2000 and 2010. Meanwhile, “In 1990, after examining 320 scientific works from around the world, 180 European medical doctors concluded that ‘the eradication of measles…would today appear to be an unrealistic goal.’” And in 1984, Professor D. Levy of Johns Hopkins University had already “concluded that if current practices [of suppressing natural immunity] continue, by the year 2050 a large part of the population will be at risk and ‘there could in theory be over 25,000 fatal cases of measles in the U.S.A.'”

Disease-conferred immunity usually lasted a lifetime. As each new generation of children contracted the infection, the immunity of those previously infected was renewed due to their continual cyclical re-exposure to the disease; except for newly-infected children and the few individuals who’d never had the disease or been exposed to it, the ‘herd immunity’ of the entire population was maintained at all times.

Vaccine ‘herd immunity’ is hit-and-miss; outbreaks of disease sometimes erupt in those who follow recommended vaccine schedules. If they do actually “immunize”, vaccines provide only short-term immunity so, in an attempt to maintain ‘herd immunity’, health authorities hold ‘cattle drives’ to round up older members of the ‘herd’ for administration of booster shots. And on it goes, to the point that, now, it’s recommended we accept cradle-to-grave shots of vaccine against pertussis, a disease which still persists after more than sixty years of widespread use of the vaccine.

Russell Blaylock, MD remarks, “One of the grand lies of the vaccine program is the concept of “herd immunity”. In fact, vaccines for most Americans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of the vaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well as others in the developed world, herd immunity doesn’t exist and hasn’t for over 60 years.”3

In the pre-vaccine era, newborns could receive antibodies against infectious diseases from their mothers who had themselves been infected as children and re-exposed to the diseases later in life. Today’s babies born to mothers who were vaccinated and never exposed to these diseases do not receive these antibodies. In direct contrast to fear mongering disease “facts” and ‘herd immunity’ theories related by Public Health, most of today’s babies are more vulnerable than babies of the pre-vaccine era.

References:
1. “Monthly estimates of the child population ‘susceptible’ to measles, 1900-1931, Baltimore, Maryland”; A W Hedrich; American Journal of Epidemiology; May 1933 – Oxford University Press.

2. ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’ by Neil Z Miller; New Atlantean Press; 2008, 2009; pg 152.

3. Ibid; pgs 16-17.

Herd Immunity: Myth or Reality?
April 5th 2014
Written By: Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD

Tetyana Obukhanych (Ph.D. in immunology from Rockefeller University, New York, NY) is the author of Vaccine Illusion. The book is available in pdf e-book form for immediate download here (http://store.greenmedinfo.com/product/vaccine-illusion-ebook).

Even though endemic outbreaks of common childhood diseases, such as measles, have been eliminated in some regions after prolonged mass-vaccination efforts, we are still being constantly reminded that reducing vaccination coverage of children in a community poses the risk of a reimported disease outbreak with potentially dire consequences to infants and immuno-compromised individuals. We are also being persuaded that implementing strict vaccination compliance will prevent an outbreak and protect vaccine-ineligible infants via the herd-immunity effect.

There is no question that a disease outbreak can happen in a non-immune community, if a virus gets there. The real question is, how well can high-vaccination compliance ensure herd immunity and protect a community from an outbreak?

Herd Immunity, a Key Principle
Herd immunity is not an immunologic idea, but rather an epidemiologic construct, which theoretically predicts successful disease control when a certain pre-calculated percentage of people in the population are immune from disease. A scholarly article on herd immunity states:

"Along with the growth of interest in herd immunity, there has been a proliferation of views of what it means or even of whether it exists at all. Several authors have written of data on measles, which "challenge" the principle of herd immunity and others cite widely divergent estimates (from 70 to 95 percent) of the magnitude of the herd immunity threshold required for measles eradication."[1]

Herd immunity has been deemed instrumental in rapid disease eradication. Relying upon the meticulous work of Dr. A. W. Hedrich, who documented annual measles attack rates in relation to the proportion of naturally immune people in the 1900s-1930s, the United States Public Health Service had confidently announced in 1967 its intent to swiftly eradicate measles in the USA over the Winter by vaccinating a sufficient number of still susceptible children.[2] Mass vaccination was implemented, but the expected herd-immunity effect did not materialize and measles epidemics did not stop in 1967.

The concept of herd immunity has been used to justify the idea of vaccinating children against a mild disease, who do not personally benefit from such vaccination, to protect a vulnerable but vaccine-ineligible segment of the population. For example, rubella is not dangerous for children. However, for pregnant women who have not become immune from rubella prior to pregnancy, a rubella infection poses a danger during the first trimester by increasing the risk of fetal developmental abnormalities (congenital rubella). Obviously, vaccination with a live-attenuated viral vaccine, such as the rubella vaccine, is contraindicated during pregnancy.

Perhaps with the good intention to immediately put an end to any risk of congenital rubella in their community, elementary-school children were vaccinated en mass against rubella in 1970 in Casper, Wyoming. Ironically, nine months after this local vaccination campaign, an outbreak of rubella hit Casper. The herd-immunity effect did not materialize and the outbreak involved over one thousand cases and reached several pregnant women. The perplexed authors of the study describing this outbreak wrote:

"The concept that a highly immune group of pre-pubertal children will prevent the spread of rubella in the rest of the community was shown by this epidemic not always to be valid."[3]

The belief in herd immunity has no doubt been influencing vaccine-related legislation in many U.S. states and other countries. This notion is used as a trump card to justify and mandate legal measures aiming to increase vaccination compliance. An implicit assumption is that liberal vaccine exemptions somehow compromise this precious herd immunity, which the public-health authorities strive to establish and maintain via vaccination.

Herd Immunity, a Flawed Concept
Although the evidence for vaccination-based herd immunity is yet to materialize, there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. Just a single publication by Poland & Jacobson (1994) reports on 18 different measles outbreaks throughout North America, occurring in school populations with very-high vaccination coverage for measles (71% to 99.8%). In these outbreaks, vaccinated children constituted 30% to 100% of measles cases. Many more similar outbreaks, occurring after 1994, can be found by searching epidemiologic literature.

Before the 1990s, only a single dose of the measles vaccine was on the childhood schedule in North America. Frequent occurrence of measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated communities have been blamed by the medical establishment on what they thought was a failure-prone, single-shot vaccination strategy. The second MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) shot was introduced in the United States and Canada in the 1990s, followed by the elimination of the endemic measles virus from North America by 2002.

In 2011, an imported measles outbreak – and the largest in the post-elimination era – hit a community in Quebec, Canada with 95-97% measles vaccination compliance in the era of double vaccination against measles. If double vaccination is not enough to patch those alleged vaccine failures and ensure the elusive herd immunity, should we then look forward to triple (or, might as well, quadruple) MMR vaccination strategy to see how that might work out with respect to herd immunity? Or, should we instead re-examine the herd immunity concept itself?

The herd-immunity concept is based on a faulty assumption that vaccination elicits in an individual a state equivalent to bona fide immunity (life-long resistance to viral infection). As with any garbage in-garbage out type of theory, the expectations of the herd-immunity theory are bound to fail in the real world.

Ochsenbein et al. (2000) conducted an experiment in mice, in which they compared the effect of injecting mice with two preparations of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). They immunized mice with either unmodified VSV (live virus) or ultraviolet light-inactivated VSV incapable of replication (dead virus). Then they tested the capacity of the serum from the two groups of immunized animals to neutralize live VSV over the 300 days following immunization.

The injection of the live-virus preparation induced long-lasting virus-neutralization capacity of the serum in mice, which persisted for the whole duration of the study (300 days). In contrast, the injection of the dead-virus preparation induced much lower levels of virus-neutralizing serum titers to start with. Virus-neutralizing serum titers reached a peak at 20 days post-immunization and then started to wane rapidly. They went below the level detectable by the neutralization test by the end of the study period (300 days). The conclusion of this experiment was that a procedure that attenuates or inactivates the virus also diminishes its ability to induce long-lasting virus-neutralizing serum titers upon immunization of animals.

Vaccines against viral childhood diseases are similarly prepared by first isolating the virus from a sick person, then rendering it artificially attenuated or inactivated to make a vaccine. The attenuation or inactivation of a wild virus to become a vaccine-strain virus is done to reduce the likelihood of it inducing the disease symptoms or complications, although this happens anyway in some cases. The process of attenuation, while making a vaccine virus "safer" than the original wild virus, as far as disease symptoms are concerned, also limits the durability of vaccine protection. In fact, all vaccines are by necessity either attenuated or inactivated microorganisms or their isolated pieces mixed with adjuvants; and, therefore, the protective effect of any vaccine is bound to wane sooner or later.

The protective threshold for measles-virus neutralizing serum titers in humans is known.[4] Also known is the duration of time after vaccination with MMR when measles-virus neutralizing serum titers drop below the protective level in a segment of the population. [5]

The Boston University Measles Study
In 1990, a blood drive was conducted among the students of Boston University a month before the campus was hit with a measles outbreak. Due to these natural circumstances, researchers happened to have access to blood samples of many students who either got measles or were spared from the disease during the outbreak. The levels of measles virus-neutralizing serum titers were appropriately measured by the plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) technique, a month prior to and two months after the exposure. Pre-exposure PRN titers were then correlated with the degree of protection from measles: (1) no detectable infection or disease; (2) serologically confirmed measles infection with a modified clinical course of disease; or (3) full-blown measles. By the way, eight out of nine students who ended up getting full-blown measles, had been vaccinated against measles in their childhood.

The outcome of the Boston University measles outbreak study by Chen et al. (1990) was the following:

(a) In all previously vaccinated students who experienced full-blown measles, pre-exposure PRN titers were below 120;

(b) 70% of students whose pre-exposure PRN titers were between 120 and 1052, ended up having a serologically confirmed measles infection, but since their altered disease symptoms did not conform to the clinical measles case definition, they were categorized as non-cases during the outbreak; and

(c) Students with pre-exposure PRN titers in excess of 1052 were for the most part protected both from the typical clinical disease and measles infection.

During the outbreak, many students with pre-exposure PRN titers between 120 and 1052, who were officially categorized as non-cases, nevertheless had most of the viral-disease symptoms, including cough, photophobia, headache, and fever. These "non-cases" ended up with high post-exposure measles PRN titers, just as the disease cases did, suggesting that they were able to replicate the virus during their illness and possibly transmit it.

Subsequent Measles Vaccine Observations
A study by LeBaron et al. (2007) was conducted to determine the duration of measles virus-neutralization serum titers after the receipt of the second MMR shot. The study enrolled several hundred healthy Caucasian children from rural U.S. areas free of measles outbreaks for the duration of the study. About a quarter of these children generated relatively high titers in response to vaccination, although not nearly as high as the titers after a natural infection would be. The rest responded modestly, and some very poorly. The titers in all children, regardless of being high, moderate, or low, reached a peak in a month after the MMR booster, then came down in six months to the pre-booster levels and continued to decline gradually over the next 5-10 years of observation.

In the above study, only about a top quarter of children (called high responders) were able to maintain PRN titers in excess of 1000 units 10 years following their second MMR shot, received at the age of five. These children are therefore likely to still be protected from the measles infection by the time they are adolescents.

The least-efficient vaccine responders (bottom 5%) had their PRN titers fall below 120 units within 5-10 years after the second MMR shot. This percentage of vaccinated children is expected to have full-blown, clinically identifiable measles upon exposure when they get a bit older. This is the reason why vaccinated (and even twice-vaccinated) people show up as disease cases in numbers equal to or even exceeding the unvaccinated cases in communities with very high (>95%) vaccination coverage. Rapid loss of vaccine protection in low responders is the reason for the paradox of a "vaccine-preventable" disease becoming the disease of the vaccinated in highly vaccinated communities. Such disease cases (and outbreaks driven by them) are not due to random vaccine failures, they are anticipated vaccine failures.

For the majority of children, the PRN titers fall between 120 and 1000 by the time they reach adolescence. These individuals can acquire infection upon exposure and be potentially contagious during an outbreak, although they might experience a modified course of measles and therefore not be labeled as measles cases for the purposes of reporting.

High Vaccination Compliance Is No Guarantee
Measles cases imported into North America after the eradication of the endemic virus in the early 2000s had typically resulted in small or no sustained outbreaks in the last decade, in part due to the vigilance of the public-health authorities in quarantine implementation. However, the 2011 imported outbreak of measles in Quebec, Canada, characterized by de Serreset al. (2013), appeared to be ominously different. Strict quarantine measures were not implemented, possibly because of the assumption that the region was well under herd immunity due to an exceptionally high and uniform vaccination compliance for measles (95-97%) in this region. The consequences of relying on non-existent herd immunity as opposed to quarantine in curbing an imported disease outbreak were very telling.

Imported by a high-school teacher during the Spring break trip abroad (he himself having been vaccinated for measles in his childhood), the outbreak spread swiftly from this index case, involved more than 600 individuals, and lasted for half a year. Nearly 50% of the measles cases were twice-vaccinated individuals. As would be predicted by the waning nature of vaccine-based protection, the contribution of twice-vaccinated children to disease cases increased with age. Twice-vaccinated cases constituted only 4.1% of the 5-9 age group, but 18% of the 10-14 age group, and 22% of the 15-19 age group. Unfortunately, the study did not assess how many previously vaccinated individuals ended up getting a measles infection with a modified course of disease and thus were not counted as disease cases for the purposes of reporting, yet were spreading the virus around in the community.

The medical establishment assumes that vaccinated children, if they themselves get infected with the virus or even develop full-blown (called breakthrough) disease, cannot transmit it to others. Some cite a paper published in the prestigious Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) as providing evidence for this assumption. Indeed, the title of the article reads "Failure of Vaccinated Children to Transmit Measles."[6] However, careful examination of the study design reveals that it did not properly address the question it purported to address: whether vaccinated children who get infected during an outbreak can or cannot transmit the virus.

The results of the study clearly show that during an outbreak of measles in an Iowa community in 1970s, which involved both vaccinated and unvaccinated children, non-sick vaccinated children were unlikely to transmit measles to their younger preschool siblings, many of whom could have been recently vaccinated themselves and therefore not vulnerable to measles anyway during that particular outbreak. The vaccination status of those younger siblings was not determined (or disclosed) by the study. Curiously, the study shows that non-sick unvaccinated children also "failed" to transmit measles (which they obviously didn't contract during that particular outbreak) to their younger preschool siblings with undisclosed vaccination status. If this tells us anything about the failure of the vaccinated children to transmit the virus, then this failure has nothing to do with their vaccination status. But wouldn't a paper entitled "Failure of Unvaccinated Children to Transmit Measles" be egregiously out of place in JAMA? read more here (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/herd-immunity-myth-or-reality)

Full disclosure... she has been debunked by skepticalraptor

2018/08/20 BY THE ORIGINAL SKEPTICAL RAPTOR
Tetyana Obukhanych – another anti-vaccine appeal to false authority

There are so many annoying issues about the antivaccination cult, that most of us can’t even keep up with it. If only they would provide evidence published in high quality, peer-reviewed journals (yes, a high standard, but if we’re talking about public health, a high standard is required), the fake debate would move into a real scientific discussion. One of their favorite feints against real evidence is to push people, like Tetyana Obukhanych, who appear to have great credentials, but once you dig below the surface, not much is there.

One of the most irritating problems I have with the anti-vaccination movement is their over-reliance on false authorities, where they trumpet the publications or commentary from someone who appears to have all of the credentials to be a part of the discussion on vaccines, but really doesn’t. Here’s the thing – it simply does not matter who the authority is or isn’t, all that matters is the evidence.

For example, Christopher Shaw and Lucija Tomljenovic, two researchers in the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of British Columbia, have, for all intents and purposes, sterling credentials in medicine and science. However, they publish nonsense research (usually filled with the weakest of epidemiology trying to show a population-level correlation between vaccines and adverse events) in low ranked scientific journals.

Now the anti-vaccine world has a new hero – Tetyana Obukhanych.

skepticalraptor (https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/appeal-to-false-authority-who-is-tetyana-obukhanych/)

Delight

30th April 2019, 00:25

Paul Thomas is not ANTI-VAX. He has a pediatric practice that has an individualized approach to vaccination. He wrote a book called "The Vaccine Friendly Plan" (https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Friendly-Plan-Effective-Health-Pregnancy/dp/1101884231/ref=sr_1_1?crid=VZB0MCKM3ZB9&keywords=the+vaccine+friendly+plan+by+paul+thomas&qid=1556583452&s=gateway&sprefix=the+vaccine+friendly%2Caps%2C-1&sr=8-1).

He has been harrassed. Challenged to prove his approach is not dangerous to children, he was able to show through data sets that his clients do not have the catastrophic side effects of developmental delays diagnosed as autism and ASD. He is part of a group "Physicians For Informed Consent".
He emphasizes informed consent and no coercion. He follows "First Do No Harm".

A Pediatrician's Perspective on Mandatory Vaccination Laws, Paul Thomas, M.D.

Paul Thomas, M.D., shares his journey from board-certified pediatrician administering the myriad of vaccines recommended by the CDC and AAP, to becoming fully informed about vaccine risks and making changes in his practice to improve patient health outcomes.

85jda2p5A6g

Paul Thomas, MD- Vaccine Friendly Plan
02:09 CDC Recommendations for Pregnancy: The Tdap vaccine is recommended for women during pregnancy. Just a few decades ago, pregnancy was a sacred time, a time to protect an unborn child from toxins and other dangers

03:52 Tdap Pregnancy Vaccine Theory:

05:53 Lack of Data on Drugs: There are lots of studies, but few randomized placebo controlled studies. Vaccines get a special fast track. One that upsets Dr. Thomas is the HPV Gardasil vaccine that is administered to teenagers to prevent cervical cancer in women.

08:43 Toxins, Toxins, Toxins: At the time of the 1 in 1000 study in Norway, the US autism rate was 1 in 100. What toxins do we have in the US that they don’t have in Norway? GMO is banned in most of Europe. They also do not do the hepatitis B vaccines for newborns. We have been doing this in the US for about 20 years. Hep B is contracted from sex and IV drug use, which babies don’t do. Babies can get it if their mothers have it. The CDC believes that 1 in 100 mothers have hepatitis B, however some studies say it is more like 1 in 1,000. We are injecting a 250 mcg toxic dose of aluminum to 99 out a hundred or 999 out of a thousand infants for a disease for which they are not at risk.

11:47 Flu Shots and Autism: There are studies that show an increased risk of autism if you have inflammation in the womb.

12:28 Genomics: There are hundreds of thousands of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms). Much research is being done.

13:48 Individualized Vaccine Approach: Families should be able to individualize the approach to vaccines.

17:47 Dr. Thomas’ Shift to Integrative Pediatrics:

19:21 Developmental Delays: A policy in Dr. Thomas’ practice is if you start to see developmental delays, you stop all further vaccination. Each child is an individual and care must be tailored to what you are seeing.

20:31 Informed Consent: Doctors have been taught to never do anything to a patient without informed consent, explaining explicitly the risks and benefits of the procedure. Also explained must be the alternatives.

22:24 Herd Immunity: Herd immunity is a concept that if we vaccinate enough in the human herd, if the disease is introduced into the herd, it cannot take hold.

25:34 Vaccines and Pediatricians: Dr. Thomas’ book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan is about far more than vaccines.

30:50 CDC’s View on Risk: Allergic reaction and severe autoimmunity issues are seen as risk by the CDC, but not family history, genetics or other impacts.

31:34 Pediatricians Must Think for Themselves: It is time for pediatricians to stand up and return to informed consent.

36:12 Dr. Thomas’ Morning Routine:

40:18 Dr. Thomas’ Favorite Botanical:

V7XdiX_BskA

Delight

30th April 2019, 01:07

Explanation of California bill that threatens Medical Exemptions for school aged children.

Christina Hildebrand explains SB276
Published on Apr 29, 2019
zjT22i1LODg

Delight

30th April 2019, 01:23

Bob Sears MD is the medical canary heralding suppression of physicians ability to grant medical exemptions.

Dr. Bob Sears on CA Medical Probation: In His Own Words (https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/06/dr-bob-sears-on-ca-medical-probation-in-his-own-words.html)

Dr-Bob-Sears Note: We support Dr. Bob Sears' commitment to treating patients as individuals and his willingness not to compromise his medical ethics. California is a political bellwether state. Their draconian vaccine policies are shocking. Healthy children banned from school. And good doctors barred from practicing. Below the LA Times report is Dr. Sears' on words on his public Facebook page. For those who want to hear the story from the horse's mouth, not the jackasses at the LA Times, long known for castigating the vaccine safety community. He wrote a letter - and madness ensued. By the way, the Times new owner is "Soon-Shiong, 65, has lived in Los Angeles for 38 years and is one of its richest residents, with a fortune estimated at $7.6 billion by Forbes. He holds a small ownership stake in the Lakers, runs a cluster of healthcare companies, operates a cutting-edge biotech laboratory in Culver City and, last year, rescued six small California hospitals. He has pioneered medical treatments and performed scientific experiments for NASA’s Space Shuttle program." So how to you think medicine will be treated at the paper? Objectively? Dr. Richard Pan is behind the vaccine laws in California. Dr. Soon Shiong will report his work.

LA Times report: California doctor critical of vaccines is punished for exempting 2-year-old boy from all childhood immunizations

In a decision that could signal how California’s fierce vaccine debates will play out in the coming years, the Medical Board of California has ordered 35 months’ probation for Dr. Bob Sears, an Orange County pediatrician well-known for being sympathetic to parents opposed to vaccines.

In 2016, the board threatened to revoke Sears’ medical license for wrongly writing a doctor’s note for a 2-year-old boy that exempted him from all childhood vaccinations. This week, the medical board settled on a lesser punishment. Read more here. (https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-sears-license-20180629-story.html)

Patients, friends, and colleagues:

I want to update all of you on the status of the California medical board case against me which began in 2015. For those who don’t know, the board has been investigating me for writing a court opinion letter for a child who had an adverse reaction to vaccines. Recently, instead of proceeding to a trial, the board has offered me a settlement of 35 months probation, and I have accepted. I am at peace with this outcome. Probation means that I will choose a pediatric colleague in the area who will periodically review some of my charts to verify I am, as always, practicing within the standard of care. I will also have to take some extra continuing medical education classes and an ethics course.

Why accept a settlement when I’ve done nothing wrong? The challenge with medical board cases is that even if I win on all aspects of a case, the medical board can still exercise its authority and put me on probation anyway. I win, or lose, a trial before a judge, then the medical board decides the punishment based on how they see the facts. Since it was likely that I’d get probation anyway, I accepted the offer.

All this for a court opinion letter? Medical boards are normally tasked with protecting patients against doctors who do things like sell drugs, see patients while intoxicated, commit insurance fraud, prescribe a wrong drug that ends up hurting a patient. However, this investigation probably came from higher up the chain of command. I picked a fight with a California Legislator, and he has been very vocal about openly working with the medical board to prosecute doctors who excuse patients from their vaccines, regardless of the merits of a case. I signed up for this.

So what really happened, and why should the very existence of this case concern every American? A child and his mother came to me for help. The mom described how her baby had suffered a moderate to severe neurologic reaction to vaccines almost three years prior, and she was afraid a judge in her upcoming hearing was going to force her to resume vaccines now. Medical records of the reaction were not available yet, and I gave the patient a letter of opinion to show the judge that the reaction was severe enough to justify not doing any more vaccines. The board accusation against me states that such a judgement should not be made without medical records. But this patient needed a letter right away. Getting the patient’s medical records ended up taking over a year. Isn’t it my job to listen to my patients and believe what a parent says happened to her baby? Isn’t that what ALL doctors do with their patients? A patient’s word is often the only evidence we have - as doctors we must trust our patients, the same way our patients trust us to look out for their best interest. After all, I don’t want a child to receive a medical treatment that could cause more harm. I am going to first do no harm, every time.

The second detail in this case, and the part which ultimately prompted me to agree to a settlement, is the medical board observed that I did not make complete medical notes of the neurological exam I performed on the child at a second visit. The child came in complaining that he had been hit on the head with a hammer. I checked him out thoroughly, performed a complete neurologic exam, but you know what? I didn’t write down all aspects of the exam. I documented everything else but that one detail.

Is this fight over? No it is not. This was just case number one. The medical board is already lining up four more cases, and these will be about vaccine medical exemptions under the new vaccine law. It seems there is an attempt to keep me on probation for the rest of my medical career. But the one thing I’m going to do differently this time is that I’m going to be very open with all the proceedings. With case one, I was silent. Upon the recommendation of my lawyers I haven’t said a thing until now. But I’m tired of being quiet.

So, case number two involves siblings who got vaccine medical exemptions from me because one of the children has a severe medical condition that research has shown can get worse with ongoing vaccination. The other child doesn’t have the condition, yet, but dad does. Exemption for reasons in a family’s medical history is an amendment guaranteed under SB277. We’ll see if the medical board agrees - probably about two years from now. These things take a long time.

Case number three is a child with a family member who had a severe permanent neurological injury after vaccines.

Case number four is a teen who had a severe reaction to an infant vaccine, her own doctor told her to opt out of that vaccine after that, and I gave her an exemption from the teen booster dose. We’ll see if the board agrees.

Case number five involves siblings to whom I did not give vaccine exemptions to, but a parent somehow reported me to the medical board anyway. I don’t know why yet. Should be interesting.

It alarms me to see any medical board questioning exemptions that are given to families who have suffered severe vaccine reactions. It should alarm everybody. More doctors need to stand up for their patients, especially the ones who are the most vulnerable. I’m going to continue to stand for these children.

Now that case one is settled, I can go back to being loud and proud about my belief that every single patient should receive complete informed consent prior to vaccinations. This two-year period of silence has been tough. I will not rest until every single family has been given access to full, complete, objective, and un-doctored information that makes every parent fully aware of the risks they accept if they don’t vaccinate their child, and all the risks they take if they do vaccinate their child. Period. And I will fight against mandatory vaccination laws until they are no more. When every single person on this planet has access to informed consent, and can make a free choice, I will then be able to say my work is done.

Delight

30th April 2019, 02:30

HPV on Trial
Published on Jan 29, 2019
Mary Holland & Eileen Ioreo discuss the conflict of interests, ethics, clinical trials, legal action, and much more in this blockbuster book that exposes the HPV vaccine.

opDa7uqKrSg

AUGUST 11, 2017
New study: Vaccine Manufacturers and FDA Regulators Used Statistical Gimmicks to Hide Risks of HPV Vaccines (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/new-study-vaccine-manufacturers-fda-regulators-used-statistical-gimmicks-hide-risks-hpv-vaccines/)

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

A new study published in Clinical Rheumatology exposes how vaccine manufacturers used phony placebos in clinical trials to conceal a wide range of devastating risks associated with HPV vaccines. Instead of using genuine inert placebos and comparing health impacts over a number of years, as is required for most new drug approvals, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline spiked their placebos with a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant and cut observation periods to a matter of months.

Researchers from Mexico’s National Institute of Cardiology pored over 28 studies published through January 2017—16 randomized trials and 12 post-marketing case series—pertaining to the three human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines currently on the market globally. In their July 2017 peer-reviewed report, the authors, Manuel Martínez-Lavin and Luis Amezcua-Guerra, uncovered evidence of numerous adverse events, including life-threatening injuries, permanent disabilities, hospitalizations and deaths, reported after vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent Cervarix vaccine and Merck’s quadrivalent or nine-valent HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Gardasil 9). Pharmaceutical company scientists routinely dismissed, minimized or concealed those injuries using statistical gimmicks and invalid comparisons designed to diminish their relative significance.

Of the 16 HPV vaccine randomized trials, only two used an inert saline placebo. Ten of the sixteen compared the HPV vaccine against a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant, and four trials used an already-approved aluminum-containing vaccine as the comparison.

Scientific researchers view double-blind placebo trials as the gold standard for testing new drugs. To minimize bias, investigators randomly assign patients to either a “treatment” group or a “control” (placebo) group and then compare health outcomes. The standard practice is to compare a new drug against a “pharmacologically inert” placebo. To minimize opportunities for bias, neither patients nor researchers know which individuals received the drug and which the placebo. However, in clinical trials of the various HPV vaccines, pharmaceutical researchers avoided this kind of rigor and instead employed sleight-of-hand flimflams to mask the seriousness of vaccine injuries.

Of the 16 HPV vaccine randomized trials, only two used an inert saline placebo. Ten of the sixteen compared the HPV vaccine against a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant, and four trials used an already-approved aluminum-containing vaccine as the comparison. One does not have to be a scientist to understand that using aluminum-containing placebos is likely to muddy the comparison between the treatment and control groups. Critics of the HPV vaccine have pointed to the aluminum adjuvant as the most likely cause of adverse reactions, and some researchers have questioned the safety of using aluminum adjuvants in vaccines at all, due to their probable role as a contributor to chronic illness. The aluminum-containing placebos appeared to provoke numerous adverse reactions among the presumably unwitting patients who received them, allowing the pharma researchers to mask the cascade of similar adverse reactions among the groups that received the vaccines. Although both placebo and study groups suffered numerous adverse events in these studies, there were minimal differences between the two groups. The similar adverse outcomes in both groups allowed industry researchers and government regulators to claim that the vaccines were perfectly safe, despite manifold disturbing reactions. The Mexican researchers’ meta-review confirms the difficulty of ascertaining vaccine-attributable differences from this mess; the researchers identified only a few indications of “significantly increased systemic adverse events in the HPV vaccine group vs. the control group” across the 16 pre-licensure trials.

The HPV promoters found it more difficult to employ deceptive devices in the 12 post-marketing safety reviews, and the Mexican authors summarize some of the more noteworthy findings. In Spain, they found a ten-fold higher incidence of vaccine-related adverse events following HPV vaccination compared to “other types of vaccines.” In Canada, they found an astonishing one in ten rate of hospital emergency department visits among HPV-vaccinated individuals “within 42 days after immunization.” Still, the industry researchers did what they could to minimize these injuries. The Mexican reviewers criticize the authors of the various post-marketing studies for failing to ask essential questions, to evaluate the many serious adverse events, or to elaborate on their often-troubling findings.

Typically, FDA requires drug companies seeking approval for a new drug to observe health outcomes in both the placebo and study groups for 4-5 years. Vaccine manufacturers take advantage of FDA regulatory loopholes that allow fast-tracking of vaccines and cut that period down to a few weeks or even a few days. This means that injuries that manifest, or are diagnosed, later in life—most neurodevelopmental disorders, for example—will escape attention entirely.

Further Smokescreens

Martínez-Lavin and Amezcua-Guerra point to clinical trial data posted on the FDA webpage for the quadrivalent Gardasil vaccine approved in 2006. Those clinical trials deployed a panoply of the kind of cunning deceptions used by industry and government researchers. Unlike many of the other HPV vaccine clinical trials, these clinical studies employed a true saline placebo.

Across the Gardasil clinical studies, a group of 15,706 females ages 9-45 and males ages 9-26 received the quadrivalent Gardasil vaccine. A control group of 594 individuals received an inert saline placebo. The industry researchers never explain the tiny relative size of the saline placebo group; it’s noteworthy that small size would have the effect of keeping unwanted signals weak. But a second control group of 13,023 received a so-called “spiked” placebo loaded with an aluminum adjuvant (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate or AAHS). The large size of this “spiked placebo” group suggests that the decision to keep the saline placebo group small was strategic.

Putting aside the thorny ethical question of whether study participants were told that they were being injected with a neurotoxin with probable associations with Alzheimer’s, dementia and other forms of brain disease, the inclusion of both saline and aluminum placebos provided these researchers a chance to do some genuine science. But the FDA webpage shows the troubling gimmick that was then employed by the FDA and Merck, which seems deliberately designed to blur datasets in order to mask adverse effects during the clinical trials. The table showing relatively minor injection-site adverse reactions—one to five days post-vaccination—displays three distinct columns for the three groups: Gardasil recipients, the aluminum “placebo” recipients, and saline placebo recipients (see table below). In the table, “Intergroup differences are obvious,” in the words of the Mexican researchers. For example, roughly three and a half times more girls/women experienced injection site swelling in the Gardasil group compared to the saline group (25.4% vs. 7.3%). In fact, by all five measures, both the Gardasil recipients and the aluminum placebo recipients fared two to three times worse than the saline recipients.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Injection-Site-Adverse-Reactions-9-26-years-old.jpg

When it came time for Merck to report on the occurrence of more serious reactions, “Systemic Adverse Reactions” and “Systemic Autoimmune Disorders,” for example, the company scientists switched to a very different format. In these tables, the third column that reported results for the saline placebo recipients disappears. Instead, Merck combined the groups receiving the spiked aluminum placebo into a single column with the group receiving the genuine saline placebo (see example below). The merger of the two control groups makes it impossible to compare results for Gardasil versus the saline placebo or the aluminum placebo versus the saline placebo. In this way, Merck’s researchers obliterated any hope of creating a meaningful safety comparison.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-Autoimmune-Disorders-Gardasil.jpg

Risks and Benefits

Given aluminum’s known neurotoxicity and its association with debilitating autoimmune conditions, it is unsurprising that there are no observable differences between the Gardasil and AAHS/saline groups. But, despite the researchers’ efforts to paper over adverse effects, they were not able to conceal the devastating health injuries to their human guinea pigs. The bottom line of these trials reveals a shocking truth: An alarming 2.3% of both their study and control groups had indicators of autoimmune diseases! These data are even more alarming when one considers that the observation period was curtailed after only six months. With this level of risk, it would seem that no loving parents would allow their daughter to receive this vaccine—particularly given the comparatively low risk posed by HPV in countries with appropriate cervical cancer screening tests. Even in countries such as India, where cervical cancer mortality is high due to late detection, leading Indian physicians argue that comprehensive screening should be the country’s top priority rather than the “panacea” of HPV vaccination.

Consider the math: According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an estimated 2.4 women per 100,000 die of cervical cancer in the US each year. On the other hand, the FDA’s Table 2 (above) shows that 2.3 per 100 girls and women developed an “incident condition potentially indicative of a systemic autoimmune disorder” after enrolling in the Gardasil clinical trial. It is difficult to understand how any rational regulator could allow more than two in 100 girls to run the risk of acquiring a lifelong autoimmune disorder, particularly when Pap smears are already doing an effective job of identifying cervical abnormalities. The NIH notes that the incidence and death rates for cervical cancer in the US declined by more than 60% after introducing Pap smear screening.

Martínez-Lavin and Amezcua-Guerra make their own effort to illustrate the zany risk-benefit ratios associated with these vaccines when discussing the results of one of the 16 clinical trials. That study compared approximately 14,000 women who received either Gardasil 9 or the original quadrivalent Gardasil. Based on the numerical outcomes of that study, the Mexican researchers calculated the likelihood of being actually “helped or harmed by the 9-valent HPV vaccine.” Their “worrisome” finding is that the “number needed to harm” is just 140, whereas 1757 women would need to receive the vaccine for a single one of them to enjoy its projected benefits.

Implications for Aluminum Adjuvants

Merck found that astronomical casualty counts were equal among both Gardasil and aluminum “placebo” recipients. The inescapable implication is that aluminum adjuvants may be a principal culprit in the flood of injuries reported for the various HPV vaccines. This conclusion, if true, requires reevaluation of the use of aluminum adjuvants in several other vaccines, including some given to infants. Aluminum adjuvant levels have mushroomed since the 2003 removal of thimerosal from three pediatric vaccines. The following chart, prepared by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, illustrates the stunning amount of aluminum in vaccines.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Aluminum-Exposure-to-Age-18-1.jpg

Multiple peer-reviewed studies have connected aluminum exposures to a range of autoimmune and neurological disorders, including dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, that have become epidemic coterminous with these aluminum exposures. A review in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition warns of dangerous accumulation of aluminum in the brain when, as in the case of vaccination, “protective gastrointestinal mechanisms are bypassed.” It’s time to go back to the drawing board on HPV vaccines and aluminum adjuvants. More importantly, FDA needs to start requiring the same rigorous pre-licensing safety testing for vaccines that it has long required for other drugs. All existing vaccines, particularly those containing aluminum, should be safety-reviewed according to these more stringent standards.

Delight

30th April 2019, 03:10

The mercenaries cannot be depended upon to do the right thing

the truth is out: Gardasil vaccine coverup exposed
by kelly brogan, md (https://kellybroganmd.com/truth-out-gardasil-coverup-documents-exposed/)

grassroots awareness
at lunch with publishing wheeler-dealers discussing the state of affairs in women’s mental health, a soft-spoken pregnant woman seated to my left turned to me and said: “i know this is off-topic, but what do you think of the gardasil vaccine? I know a 25 year old who got it and hasn’t been able to leave the house in months? It seems more and more people are seeing it’s a bad idea?”

this question and its implications moved me.

A woman who will soon be responsible for the welfare of another human, is asking questions she wouldn’t be asking if she just behaved like a good patient. She feels a curiosity fueled by doubt. She feels, inside herself, that something isn’t right about what we’ve been told and recommended. She senses, even if unconsciously, that the authorities we have vested with so much power, are not delivering on their promises.

Agnotology
one of my favorite medical terms, anosognosia, means lack of awareness of a deficit. I have come to find this useful in description of so many of my colleagues who practice the medicine they were trained to practice without conscious acknowledgement of its gross limitations and even hazards.

Relatedly, agnotology is the study of the propagation of ignorance. It is the meme-ification, societally, of coverups, half-truths, and misinformation. Simple catch phrases parroted in an echo chamber. It’s the creation of a mirage of information, often accomplished through concerted efforts like those described by journalist sharyl attkisson, as astroturfing.

I’ve always wondered whether those casting a dark veil over the truth know that they are doing that? Or do the folks carefully crafting messages truly believe that they are working in the best interest of you and your beloved children. In following the published literature, i will sometimes catch a glimpse of the frustration felt by doctors and medical specialty organizations who are now finding that they have to cope with an unprecedented onslaught of inquiry from their silly patients who are, of course, reading too many pseudoscience internet blogs.

Sometimes, and never in mainstream media (thank goodness for the democratization of information the internet offers!), we learn about deliberate misinformation. Whistleblower william thompson told us that the cdc had knowingly suppressed and manipulated data that demonstrated a clear statistical association between the mmr vaccine and autism in african american boys.

We also know that the 4250% increase in fetal deaths documented in the two vaccine flu season of 2009/2010 was known to the cdc but not to you or your girlfriend.

The jig is up on gardasil vaccine
and now we may have some of the most damning evidence of deliberate misinformation around one of the least indicated and most reported of all vaccines – the hpv vaccine, most commonly represented by gardasil.

A vaccine i remember feeling righteously excited for as a medical student – finally, a women’s vaccine!

The past 8 years of my research have led me to conclude that the promotion of this pharmaceutical product (and its new and improved versions) is nothing short of reckless endangerment of our youth.

Lucija tomljenovic, phd, poses this important question:

“is it ethical to put young women at risk of death or a disabling autoimmune disease at a pre-adolescent age for a vaccine that has not yet prevented a single case of cervical cancer, a disease that may develop 20-30 years after exposure to hpv, when the same can be prevented with regular pap screening which carries no risks.”

on january 14, 2016, sin hang lee, md wrote an open letter of complaint (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/who-cdc-gacvs-mislead-hpv-vaccine-safety-alleges-md-open-letter) to the director-general of the world health organization, dr. Margaret chan. Documents made available to him through a freedom of information request in new zealand revealed evidence that the global advisory committee on vaccine safety (gacvs) deliberately misled the japanese expert inquiry convened to explore concerns around hpv vaccine safety in 2014 hearings in japan.

Email chains within the committee exposed a conspiratorial energy. Like a circle of teens cooking up an alibi to give an angry parent whose carpet was stained with wine stolen from their liquor cabinet. There is an undeniable air of an us vs them strategy. But aren’t these supposed to be officials looking out for the greater good and for collective wellness?

As dr. Nicholas gonzalez once said, “medicine is the last religion. The hospital is the temple. The priests wear white and they all speak their own internal language.” it isn’t hard to generate an air of authority in the realm of medical science. Throw some definitive statements in there. Use the phrase “expert panel” or “expert opinion” or “consensus”, and be sure to attach references to any statements in question. No one ever checks references, right?

Unfortunately for drs. Pless, dr. Petousis-harris, and other committee members, dr. Lee has checked references, and what he discovered could only be made right through “an immediate independent investigation and appropriate disciplinary action”.

You can read his 15 page letter here (https://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/allegations-of-scientific-misconduct-by-gacvs.pdf)and learn how:

Declarations of harmlessness – science by proclamation – are made in the absence of available science to support these claims.
Concerns about contamination of hpv dna fragments were dismissed without a shred of evidence: References were falsely attributed to conceal a total vacuum of peer-reviewed science on the safety of hpv l1 gene dna fragments. These fragments were conflated with hpv-16 particles in hopes that this wave of the hand would quiet further inquiry.
Concerns about the antigenicity of aluminum is dismissed in direct conflict to available evidence of inflammatory response generated by vaccination as demonstrated by the who’s own data.
Tactics used to generate an illusion of scientific certainty including: Cdc technical reports by ghostwriter(s) based on phone conversations, references to unpublished phd material, and health blogs.
Dr. Lee offers a summary analysis of 22 key peer-reviewed references to summarize the available information on aluminum adjuvant as a biotoxicant.

He implies that while aluminum adjuvant may have sound intentions to stimulate a “productive”, antigen-specific immune response by damaging local cells at the injection site, sending out a stimulatory signal, the evidence of its biological activity in this vaccine is more complicated.

With the presence of viral dna, the body recognizes the pathogen dna as non-self, and this viral dna/aluminum compound stimulates an inflammatory cytokine storm.

This is plausible mechanistic explanation for autonomic dysfunction, primary ovarian failure, and sudden death, the stories of which are circulating the globe.

He states, “there is no excuse for intentionally ignoring the scientific evidence. There is no excuse for misleading global vaccination policy makers at the expense of public interest.”

hot off the press indictment
a study published just this week uses a true placebo (rather than an aluminum placebo) to demonstrates behavioral and cognitive changes induced in rodents delivered the hpv vaccine and those injected with aluminum. They conclude:

“moreover, anti-hpv antibodies from the sera of gardasil and gardasil+pt-injected mice showed cross-reactivity with the mouse brain protein extract. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed microglial activation in the ca1 area of the hippocampus of gardasil-injected mice compared to the control. It appears that gardasil via its al adjuvant and hpv antigens has the ability to trigger neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions, further leading to behavioral changes.”

this signal of harm for this fda fast-tracked product has become undeniable.

When you know better, do better
what we need to know, we already know.

We are in an uncomfortable transition phase, one that charles eisenstein refers to as the space between the story of separation and the story of interbeing. We are allowing our previously constructed worldview – the beliefs underpinning the myth of science and technology as agents to free and better us – to crumble. We are watching the defenders of this story scramble to keep the illusion of it alive, like that of oz behind the curtain.

But dorothy had what she needed to get home, the whole time.

Let go of the us vs germs paradigm. There’s a huge safety net to catch you. It is woven from the flora and fauna waiting patiently for our return.

behind the veil: Conflicts of interest and fraud in medical research
by
chris kresser

last updated on
april 10, 2019 (https://chriskresser.com/behind-the-veil-conflicts-of-interest-and-fraud-in-medical-research/)

recent reports have revealed that conflicts of interest and research fraud are rarely reported in the scientific literature or announced to the general public, which raises questions about the integrity of clinical trials and the reliability of public agencies like the fda and cdc.

In this article, i’m going to discuss two other reasons that the public mistrusts scientific research: Fraud, and conflicts of interest.

Why conflicts of interest and fraud harm the public’s trust of medical research.

Fraud in medical research: “out of sight, out of mind, and out of the peer-reviewed literature”
a large part of the subtitle above comes directly from a paper published in jama internal medicine, authored by charles seife. (1) in short, seife discovered that clinical trial data determined to be fraudulent or mishandled by the fda is rarely excluded from research studies published in scientific journals.

One of the fda’s roles in the drug approval process is to inspect clinical trial sites to determine whether these sites are complying with fda regulations. A typical inspection might involve auditing the records of the site, verifying that investigators adhered to the trial protocol, and comparing an investigator’s notes in hospital records with data reported to the study sponsor to ensure that there aren’t any discrepancies.

If there is a violation, the fda classifies it in one of two ways: Voluntary action indicated (vai) means the inspectors have found violations, but the problems aren’t serious enough to require sanction. Official action indicated (oai) means that the inspectors have found violations significant enough to warrant official action.

Siefe and his assistants used the freedom of information act to request information from the fda, and supplemented that data with google searches of the fda database. They found 57 clinical trials that were directly linked to an oai inspection.

The misconduct identified by the fda in these cases included:

Falsification or submission of false information
underreporting of adverse events
failure to follow the investigational plan or other violations of protocol
inadequate record keeping
failure to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of patients
use of experimental compounds in patients not enrolled in trials
failure to supervise clinical investigations properly
the 57 trials seife identified were in turn linked to 78 research articles published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. 96 percent of these articles failed to mention the violations identified by the fda inspection—despite the fact that in the majority of cases the inspection was completed at least 6 months before the article was published.

Doctors, researchers, and other health professionals rely on scientific studies to establish treatment protocols and public health policies. If the data in some of these studies are fraudulent, but the doctors and researchers have no way of knowing that, the decisions they make may be unsound and even put people at unnecessary risk.

I’d like to make the significance of these omissions even more clear by sharing a couple of examples mentioned in seife’s paper.

One case involved a researcher who falsified lab test results to hide a patient’s impaired kidney and liver function in a trial comparing two chemotherapy regimens. The first dose of the regimen proved to be fatal to this patient, and the researcher was sentenced to 71 months in prison. Despite this episode being described in both fda and court documents, not one of the studies in the peer-reviewed literature associated with the chemotherapy trial have any mention of the falsification, fraud, or homicide.

Another case involved a clinical site in china participating in a large trial of apixaban, an anticoagulant (i.e. Anti-clotting) drug. The fda determined that this trial site had altered patient records and falsified data. If the data from this site had been excluded, the mortality benefit for the drug would have disappeared. In other words, the “proof” that this drug saved lives was dependent on this fraudulent data. Yet none of this discussion appears in the scientific literature. In fact, studies since 2011 have consistently relied on the full data set (including the fraudulent data from the china trial site), and this was even true for an article published nearly 18 months after the fraud was discovered.

How can such egregious cases of fraud and misconduct go unreported in the scientific literature and in the media? The answer is almost hard to believe. The fda does not notify journals when a site participating in a clinical trial receives an oai inspection, nor does it typically make any announcement which would alert the media and general public to the issues it identified.

What’s more, the documents the fda produces about these oai inspections are heavily redacted, which makes it extremely difficult even for researchers like seife who’ve invoked the freedom of information act to determine which published clinical trials are tainted by misconduct. The fda redacts these documents because it considers the identity of the drug company involved in the trial to be “confidential commercial information” that it is bound to protect.

In other words, the fda appears to believe that it’s more important to protect private, commercial interests than it is to protect public health.

Seife’s says as much in the conclusion of his paper:

However, failing to notify the medical or scientific communities about allegations of serious research misconduct in clinical trials is incompatible with the fda’s mission to protect the public health. Such allegations are relevant to include in the peer-reviewed literature on which physicians and other medical researchers rely to help them choose treatments that they offer to patients and other research participants.

The issues highlighted here raise serious concerns not only about the trustworthiness of the data in clinical trials and published research, but the reliability and motives of the agencies tasked with protecting public health.

Which takes us to the second reason that public mistrust of scientific research is sometimes well-founded: Conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of interest in research are common—and often unreported
in my article about the disconnect between scientists and the public, i mentioned that two-thirds of medical research is sponsored by drug companies, and industry-sponsored trials are more likely to report favorable results for drugs because of biased reporting, biased interpretation, or both. (2) this is a well-established phenomenon, and it has been explored in both the media and the scientific literature:

Can the source of funding for medical research affect the results? (scientific american)
bad pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients (a book authored by ben goldacre)
how pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes (social science & medicine)
pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review (british medical journal)
association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials (canadian medical association journal)
is it really a big surprise that the source of funding influences study results? After all, as upton sinclair famously said, “it’s difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary is dependent upon him not understanding it.” the time-honored saying “don’t bite the hand that feeds you” also applies here.

Unfortunately, just as research misconduct and fraud is often not reported, conflicts of interest in academic research are rarely disclosed. According to a 2009 report issued by the department of health and human services, very few universities make required reports to the government about the financial conflicts of interest of their researchers—and even when they are reported, the universities rarely require those researchers to eliminate or reduce these conflicts.

In fact, 90 percent of universities relied solely on the researchers themselves to decide whether to report their potential conflicts of interest, and half of universities don’t even ask their faculty to disclose the amount of money or stock they make from drug or device makers.

This isn’t likely to change anytime soon, according to eric g. Campbell, an associate professor at harvard medical school that was quoted in this new york times article covering the report. He said that “universities had no interest in putting real limits on the incomes of their star researchers for fear that those researchers would leave for institutions with fewer restrictions.”

but conflicts of interest aren’t just a problem in academia; they’re also a problem on expert advisory panels that influence public health policy. For example, back in 2008 dr. John briffa linked to a web page disclosing the conflicts of interest in members of the national cholesterol education program, a government organization that creates the official blood cholesterol target values for the u.s..

Are you ready for this? 8 out of the 9 doctors on the panel had direct ties to statin drug manufacturers. Here’s the complete list, excerpted from a post written by dr. Stephan guyenet in 2008 (the companies in bold are statin manufacturers):

Dr. Grundy has received honoraria from merck, pfizer, sankyo, bayer, merck/schering-plough, kos, abbott, bristol-myers squibb, and astrazeneca; he has received research grants from merck, abbott, and glaxo smith kline.

Dr. Cleeman has no financial relationships to disclose.

Dr. Bairey merz has received lecture honoraria from pfizer, merck, and kos; she has served as a consultant for pfizer, bayer, and ehc (merck); she has received unrestricted institutional grants for continuing medical education from pfizer, procter & gamble, novartis, wyeth, astrazeneca, and bristol-myers squibb medical imaging; she has received a research grant from merck; she has stock in boston scientific, ivax, eli lilly, medtronic, johnson & johnson, scipie insurance, ats medical, and biosite.

Dr. Brewer has received honoraria from astrazeneca, pfizer, lipid sciences, merck, merck/schering-plough, fournier, tularik, esperion, and novartis; he has served as a consultant for astrazeneca, pfizer, lipid sciences, merck, merck/schering-plough, fournier, tularik, sankyo, and novartis.

Dr. Clark has received honoraria for educational presentations from abbott, astrazeneca, bristol-myers squibb, merck, and pfizer; he has received grant/research support from abbott, astrazeneca, bristol-myers squibb, merck, and pfizer.

Dr. Hunninghake has received honoraria for consulting and speakers bureau from astrazeneca, merck, merck/schering-plough, and pfizer, and for consulting from kos; he has received research grants from astrazeneca, bristol-myers squibb, kos, merck, merck/schering-plough, novartis, and pfizer.

Dr. Pasternak has served as a speaker for pfizer, merck, merck/schering-plough, takeda, kos, bms-sanofi, and novartis; he has served as a consultant for merck, merck/schering-plough, sanofi, pfizer health solutions, johnson & johnson-merck, and astrazeneca.

Dr. Smith has received institutional research support from merck; he has stock in medtronic and johnson & johnson.

Dr. Stone has received honoraria for educational lectures from abbott, astrazeneca, bristol-myers squibb, kos, merck, merck/schering-plough, novartis, pfizer, reliant, and sankyo; he has served as a consultant for abbott, merck, merck/schering-plough, pfizer, and reliant.

Another 2009 report, also from the department of health and human services, revealed similar issues with expert panels that advise the centers for disease control (cdc) on vaccine safety. The report found that 64 percent of experts who served on advisory panels in 2007 to evaluate vaccines for flu and cervical cancer had potential conflicts of interest that were never identified or resolved. The report also revealed that the cdc failed nearly every time to ensure that experts adequately disclosed that they were being paid by vaccine manufacturers.

Can you see how these conflicts of interest might be a problem, when the advisory committees mentioned above strongly influence the sales of both statin drugs ($30 billion a year) and vaccines ($20 billion a year)?

Sadly, these financial relationships between experts who influence or formulate guidelines and drug companies whose drugs are being considered are not the exception, they’re the rule. A study published in jama shows that 59 percent of the experts participating in guideline creation have such financial ties. (3)

another related problem is the “revolving door” between public agencies like the cdc and fda or institutions like the u.s. Congress, and pharmaceutical companies. A year after leaving her position as the director of the cdc in 2009, dr. Julie gerberding took a position as president of merck vaccines. Another former cdc employee, dr. Thomas verstraeten, took a position with glaxosmithkline (a vaccine manufacturer) while he was still involved in completing a major study on the possible negative side effects of thimerosal (a mercury-containing compound used in some vaccines) at the cdc. Finally, over half of the lobbyists employed by the pharmaceutical industry in 2008 had worked in congress or another branch of the federal government, and 35 had been former members of congress. (4)

these conflicts of interest do not necessarily lead to fraud or misconduct. There are surely many honest and unbiased researchers and physicians investigating controversial topics like cholesterol targets and statin drugs, vaccines, and genetically-modified foods. However, studies have confirmed what common sense and an understanding of human nature would also suggest: Conflicts of interest can and do influence both individuals and institutions. For example, the financial interests of researchers are positively associated with outcomes favorable to the sponsor in medical studies, and research institutions can be influenced by industry sponsorships such as grants, endowed chairs, and other gifts. (5, 6, 7, 8)

concluding thoughts
my purpose here is not to attack the credibility of scientific research as a whole, or scientists as a group. But science is a human endeavor, and like all human endeavors, it is subject to the vagaries of human ethics and behavior. There is good science, and bad science; there is honest science, and dishonest science.

If you’ve been following my work for several years, you’ll know that my blog used to be called “the healthy skeptic.” i called it that because i believe that skepticism is healthy when it comes to science. Yet all too often i see this skepticism being applied in a biased or inconsistent manner.

For example, i’ve noticed that some people who are indignant about conflicts of interest in government agencies responsible for bank bailouts or among experts responsible for establishing blood cholesterol targets are completely unwilling to consider how similar conflicts might affect research on, say, genetically-modified foods.

I’ve also encountered people who are skeptical of any challenge to the status quo, but don’t apply their skepticism with the same rigor to the the status quo itself. On the other side of the coin are those that accept unconventional or alternative ideas (regardless of whether there is evidence to support them), and tend to reject anything that could be remotely construed as conventional or mainstream.

Someday, perhaps we’ll be able to extricate the financial interests of big pharma from the behavior of medical scientists and regulatory agencies. Until then, our responsibility—whether we are clinicians, patients, researchers, or members of the media—is to acknowledge the influence these relationships may have on scientific research, and take that influence into account when considering controversial issues—especially when large amounts of money are at stake.

Now i’d like to hear from you. Were you aware that research misconduct rarely gets reported on in the media or scientific literature? Are you surprised by the extent to which conflicts of interest are present on advisory panels responsible for creating guidelines? How do you feel about this subject after reading this article? Let us know in the comments section.

Delight

30th April 2019, 04:13

One can see that sincere people believe vaccination is a necessary evil and those insincere who stand to gain don't care. Those who stand to lose are frightened but those who lose to fear will be everyone

ERevJ3qfwPM

LxwElUZrxPI

dvnUCf13LaA

Oregon Vaccine Bill Clears Committee, Heads To House
by Dirk VanderHart April 26, 2019 (https://www.opb.org/news/article/oregon-vaccine-bill-heads-to-house/)
A bill tightening Oregon vaccination laws will move on to a vote in the state’s House of Representatives, despite a deluge of opposing calls and e-mails to lawmakers in recent days.

In a vote that largely stuck to party lines, the Legislature’s budget committee on Friday voted 13-7 to move House Bill 3063 to the full House. The vote came at the tail end of a week when hundreds of parents who opposed the bill flocked repeatedly to the Capitol, holding a raucous rally on the front steps on Tuesday and testifying for hours against the measure on Wednesday.

“This issue has been one of the most emotional issues I’ve seen in all of my years in the Legislature,” said state Sen. Lee Beyer, D-Springfield, at a hearing of the Joint Ways and Means Committee.

Beyer voted to send the bill to the full House, saying it should be heard by the House and Senate. But he also said he’d be a “no” vote if the bill makes it to his chamber.

“I think it goes too far,” Beyer said.

Proposed in response to a measles outbreak centered in Southwest Washington this year, HB 3063 would eliminate the religious or philosophical exemptions parents have long been able to claim in order to avoid otherwise required vaccines and still send their kids to school.

RELATED COVERAGE

In Oregon’s Vaccine Fight, Some Exemptions Could Become Easier To Get
Under the bill, parents could still obtain exemptions for valid medical reasons — and the process for those exemptions would be more permissive. That has not been enough to quell the concerns of some parents, who believe vaccines pose a risk to their children and are being irresponsibly pushed by pharmaceutical companies.

On the other side of the debate, a wide array of doctors and health officials support the bill, saying it will curb the spread of preventable diseases that endanger children or people with compromised immune systems. The overwhelming majority of scientific study has found vaccines are safe and effective.

That the bill was before the Legislature’s budget committee was something of a technicality. It contains $100,000 to the Oregon Health Authority, which would be used to mount an education campaign ahead of the August 2020 deadline for immunizing school children.

But the Ways and Means Committee also includes a co-chair, Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, who has championed legislation to eliminate non-medical exemptions in the past. And the fact that the committee is comprised of both senators and representatives means HB 3063 does not necessarily have to go before a Senate committee if it passes a full floor vote in the House. The bill already passed the House Health Care Committee.

At Friday’s brief work session, lawmakers who are skeptical of the legislation largely dominated the discussion.

State Sen. Fred Girod, R-Stayton, spoke of his phone being “jammed this morning with emails and messages, almost all in opposition.”

“Ironically, about three-quarters of them are in the opposite party than me,” said Girod, a retired dentist. “I am a health provider, and I believe that people have the right to say ‘no.’”

Rep. David Gomberg, D-Central Coast, said he’d received more than 2,000 emails and calls about the bill the day before. “The great majority of them were not from my district,” said Gomberg, who voted for the bill out of worry for the health of children and the elderly.

Sen. Dallas Heard, R-Roseburg, who’d made an emotional speech on the bill at a subcommittee hearing on the bill two days earlier, called his vote “the strongest no I have ever been on any bill.”

Rep. Greg Smith, R-Heppner, pointed out that the legislation had scrambled the usual political lines, with anti-abortion types advocating for medical choice, and people who support abortion backing required vaccinations.

“I find it extremely ironic, those that are pro-life now are advocating for choice, and those that are pro-choice now are advocating for a mandate,” said Smith, who voted against the bill in committee but said he did not know how he would vote when the full House considers it. “That’s ironic, and we need to keep that in mind in the future.”

The 13-7 vote was ultimately not close, and included one Republican, Sen. Chuck Thomsen, for the measure and one Democrat, Sen. Betsy Johnson, against.

Friday’s vote for tougher vaccine requirements isn’t necessarily an indication of what’s in store for HB 3063 on the floor. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers. Still, two Democratic lawmakers, Beyer and Rep. Susan McLain voted for the bill as a “courtesy” but made clear they would vote no in their full chamber.

Bubu

30th April 2019, 10:07

Sandy123

30th April 2019, 22:06

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/04/24/japan-leads-the-way-no-vaccine-mandates-and-no-mmr-vaccine-healthier-children/

to reiterate, the U.S. has the most aggressive vaccine schedule of developed countries (administering the most vaccines the earliest). If vaccines save lives, why are American children “dying at a faster rate, and…dying younger” compared to children in 19 other wealthy countries—translating into a “57 percent greater risk of death before reaching adulthood”? Japanese children, who receive the fewest vaccines—with no government mandates for vaccination—grow up to enjoy “long and vigorous” lives. International infant mortality and health statistics and their correlation to vaccination protocols show results that government and health officials are ignoring at our children’s great peril.

Among the 20 countries with the world’s best infant mortality outcomes, only three countries (Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore) automatically administer the HepB vaccine to all newborns—governed by the rationale that hepatitis B infection is highly endemic in these countries. Most of the other 17 top-ranking countries—including Japan—give the HepB vaccine at birth only if the mother is hepatitis B positive (Table 1). The U.S., with its disgraceful #56 infant mortality ranking, gives the HepB vaccine to all four million babies born annually despite a low incidence of hepatitis B.

Is the U.S. Sacrificing Children’s Health for Profits?
Merck, the MMR vaccine’s manufacturer, is in court over MMR-related fraud. Whistleblowers allege the pharmaceutical giant rigged its efficacy data for the vaccine’s mumps component to ensure its continued market monopoly. The whistleblower evidence has given rise to two separate court cases. In addition, a CDC whistleblower has alleged the MMR vaccine increases autism risks in some children. Others have reported that the potential risk of permanent injuryfrom the MMR vaccine dwarfs the risks of getting measles.

Why do the FDA and CDC continue to endorse the problematic MMR vaccine despite Merck’s implication in fraud over the vaccine’s safety and efficacy? Why do U.S. legislators and government officials not demand a better alternative, as Japan did over two decades ago? Why are U.S. cities and states forcing Merck’s MMR vaccine on American children? Is the U.S. government protecting children, or Merck? Why are U.S. officials ignoring Japan’s exemplary model, which proves that the most measured vaccination program in the industrialized world and “first-class sanitation and levels of nutrition” can produce optimal child health outcomes that are leading the world?

A central tenet of a free and democratic society is the freedom to make informed decisions about medical interventions that carry serious potential risks. This includes the right to be apprised of benefits and risks—and the ability to say no. The Nuremberg Code of ethics established the necessity of informed consent without “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” Forcing the MMR vaccine, or any other vaccine, on those who are uninformed or who do not consent represents nothing less than medical tyranny.

This is only part of the article. It also has a few interesting tables of other countries schedules.

Delight

30th April 2019, 23:12

This was in the Washington Post

Anti-vaxxers are dangerous. Make them face isolation, fines, arrests. (https://beta-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/04/30/time-get-much-tougher-anti-vaccine-crowd/?outputType=amp&fbclid=IwAR361enIvrSlICmteLGjQ83_B6CpwKechfA3fG0AaZHw29lMBEk4U1yKVx4&amp_js_v=0.1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s)
By Juliette Kayyem
April 30, 2019

I love my children. And, if I’m in a gracious mood, I believe that parents who do not vaccinate their children love theirs as much as I love mine.

But, I am quite confident in this fact: I love their children much more than they love mine. These anti-vaxxer parents — call them free-riders or even pro-plague — are putting my children and our communities at risk to cater to their erroneous belief that vaccinations would harm their children rather than contribute to the elimination of childhood diseases.

It is time we stop viewing the anti-vax movement and its adherents’ responsibility for the measles outbreak as a public health problem. With more than 700 reported cases confirmed in 22 states, it is now a public safety crisis, and the tools of public safety — arrests, fines, isolation — are absolutely necessary.

We are not in a “both sides” moment. On Friday, President Trump finally conceded that his previous statements questioning the safety of vaccinations (promoting the debunked claim that vaccinations contribute to autism) were erroneous. He didn’t put it that way, of course; instead, when pressed, he said, “They have to get the shots.” Just as he does with “both sides” statements regarding white supremacists, Trump promotes risky, unscientific ideologies until the reality of their harms becomes too dangerous to ignore.

And, when it comes to the measles, it is too late to ignore. “Get the shots” is not a plan. We are in a crisis; an avoidable one, but a crisis nonetheless. Measles cases in the United States have exceeded the highest number on record since the disease was declared eliminated nationwide in 2000. Trump’s statement came too late; the measles are back.

It is important to remember that the measles outbreak is not only the result of low-information communities or religious exceptions. Indeed, religious leaders are urging their adherents to get the shots, even in the Hasidic communities hit hardest by outbreaks. Imagine, instead, that this outbreak is what happens when negligent people do negligent things, such as sending a kid to school with a loaded gun and hoping for the best.

In some places, sadly, more education is necessary, especially in isolated communities. But some of the crisis was bred in well-off and informed communities, where voodoo science is given equal weight with yoga and kale; vaccination rates in areas of California have, at times, been less than rates in South Sudan. And this utter negligence has had, until last week, a safe harbor in the White House (and is being amplified by Russia, a hostile foreign power that exacerbates this false narrative through its disinformation bot-farms to promote an unsafe America).

The initial steps we have taken are essential: prohibit non-vaccinated children from public spaces, including schools; promote educational efforts; and, in extreme cases, force isolation on pockets of populations that might have been exposed to the outbreak, as is happening now in the University of California system. But these efforts impact the children who might have been put at risk by the decision of individuals not to vaccinate. Viewed through the lens of public safety, it is the parents who should be punished. Why not make them pay for the harms they are causing?

Fines for the increased public safety burdens put on these communities by a few ought not to be the responsibility of all. In many states, when hikers ignore warnings that certain trails are too dangerous and then have to be rescued, the fees for the rescue must be paid by the hikers. It’s a fine for making a self-centered decision that placed an unreasonable burden on a larger community. Measles should be no different.

In the same way we have created sex-offenders lists to protect our children, communities can inventory families that choose not to be vaccinated, notifying employers of these parents as well as neighbors who may choose not to expose their children. Exceptions might be made for religious or medical reasons, but not for those who are simply choosing to ignore the science.

The anti-vaxxers are also putting at risk populations that cannot be vaccinated due to health conditions or allergic reactions. Mostly children and the elderly, these people are dependent on the rest of us being vaccinated so that they can benefit from herd protections; they should be the only acceptable free-riders.

Yes, this language is harsh, the language of a homeland security expert, not a pediatrician. Maybe the threat of greater penalties will get these parents to be less self-centered. But, sometimes a crisis requires a change in orientation if only to scare the free-riders into loving my children as much as I love theirs.

Hey wait a minute

The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm
Tuesday, April 9th 2019 at 2:30 pm
Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2019 (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccinated-spreading-measles-who-merck-cdc-documents-confirms)

20 years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. The manufacturer Merck's own product warning links MMR to a potentially fatal form of brain inflammation caused by measles. Why is this evidence not being reported?

The Vaccinated Spreading Measles
The phenomenon of measles infection spread by MMR (live measles-mumps-rubella vaccine) has been known about for decades. In fact, 20 years ago, scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it.

Published in 1995 in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology and titled, "Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients," researchers analyzed urine samples from newly MMR vaccinated 15-month-old children and young adults and reported their eye-opening results as following:

Measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period.
In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after the children were vaccinated.
Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.
The authors of this study used a relatively new technology at that time, namely, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which they believed could help resolve growing challenges associated with measles detection in the shifting post-mass immunization epidemiological and clinical landscape. These challenges include:

A changing clinical presentation towards 'milder' or asymptomatic measles in previously vaccinated individuals.
A changing epidemiological distribution of measles (a shift toward children younger than 15 months, teenagers, and young adults)
Increasing difficulty distinguishing measles-like symptoms (exanthema) caused by a range of other pathogens from those caused by measles virus.
An increase in sporadic measles outbreaks in previously vaccinated individuals.
Twenty years later, PCR testing is widely acknowledged as highly sensitive and specific, and the only efficient way to distinguish vaccine-strain and wild-type measles infection, as their clinical presentation are indistinguishable.

Did the CDC Use PCR Testing On The Disneyland Measles Cases?
The 2015 measles outbreak at Disney was a perfect example of where PCR testing could be used to ascertain the true origins of the outbreak. The a priori assumption that the non-vaccinated are carriers and transmitters of a disease the vaccinated are immune to has not been scientifically validated. Since vaccine strain measles has almost entirely supplanted wild-type, communally acquired measles, it is statistically unlikely that PCR tests will reveal the media's hysterical storyline -- "non-vaxxers brought back an eradicated disease!" -- to be true. Until such studies are performed and exposed, we will never know for certain.

Laura Hayes, of Age of Autism, recently addressed this key question in her insightful article "Disney, Measles, and the Fantasyland of Vaccine Perfection":

"Has there been any laboratory confirmation of even one case of the supposed measles related to Disneyland? If yes, was the confirmed case tested to determine whether it was wild-type measles or vaccine-strain measles? If not, why not? These are important questions to ask. Is it measles or not? If yes, what kind, because if it's vaccine-strain measles, then that means it is the vaccinated who are contagious and spreading measles resulting in what the media likes to label "outbreaks" to create panic (a panic more appropriately triggered by our 25 year history of epidemic autism).

It would be what one might call vaccine fallout. People who receive live-virus vaccines, such as the MMR, can then shed that live virus, for up to many weeks and can infect others. Other live-virus vaccines include the nasal flu vaccine, shingles vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, chicken pox vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine."

Additional Evidence That the Vaccinated Are Not Immune, Spread Disease
The National Vaccine Information Center has published an important document relevant to this topic titled "The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission." Pages 34-36 in the section on "Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses and Live Attenuated Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses" discuss evidence that the MMR vaccine can lead to measles infection and transmission.

Cases highlighted include:

In 2010, Eurosurveillance published a report about excretion of vaccine strain measles virus in urine and pharyngeal secretions of a Croatian child with vaccine-associated rash illness.[1] A healthy 14-month old child was given MMR vaccine and eight days later developed macular rash and fever. Lab testing of throat and urine samples between two and four weeks after vaccination tested positive for vaccine strain measles virus. Authors of the report pointed out that when children experience a fever and rash after MMR vaccination, only molecular lab testing can determine whether the symptoms are due to vaccine strain measles virus infection. They stated: "According to WHO guidelines for measles and rubella elimination, routine discrimination between aetiologies of febrile rash disease is done by virus detection. However, in a patient recently MMR-vaccinated, only molecular techniques can differentiate between wild type measles or rubella infection or vaccine-associated disease. This case report demonstrates that excretion of Schwartz measles virus occurs in vaccinees."
In 2012, Pediatric Child Health published a report describing a healthy 15-month old child in Canada, who developed irritability, fever, cough, conjunctivitis and rash within seven days of an MMR shot.[2] Blood, urine and throat swab tests were positive for vaccine strain measles virus infection 12 days after vaccination. Addressing the potential for measles vaccine strain virus transmission to others, the authors stated, "While the attenuated virus can be detected in clinical specimens following immunization, it is understood that administration of the MMR vaccine to immunocompetent individuals does not carry the risk of secondary transmission to susceptible hosts.
In 2013, Eurosurveillance published a report of vaccine strain measles occurring weeks after MMR vaccination in Canada. Authors stated, "We describe a case of measlesmumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine-associated measles illness that was positive by both PCR and IgM, five weeks after administration of the MMR vaccine." The case involved a two-year-old child, who developed runny nose, fever, cough, macular rash and conjunctivitis after vaccination and tested positive for vaccine strain measles virus infection in throat swab and blood tests.[3] Canadian health officials authoring the report raised the question of whether there are unidentified cases of vaccine strain measles infections and the need to know more about how long measles vaccine strain shedding lasts. They concluded that the case they reported "likely represents the existence of additional, but unidentified, exceptions to the typical timeframe for measles vaccine virus shedding and illness." They added that "further investigation is needed on the upper limit of measles vaccine virus shedding based on increased sensitivity of the RT-PCR-based detection technologies and immunological factors associated with vaccine-associated measles illness and virus shedding."
In addition to this evidence for the disease-promoting nature of the measles vaccine, we recently reported on a case of a twice vaccinated adult in NYC becoming infected with measles and then spreading it to two secondary contacts, both of which were vaccinated twice and found to have presumably protective IgM antibodies.

This double failure of the MMR vaccine renders highly suspicious the unsubstantiated claims that when an outbreak of measles occurs the non- or minimally vaccinated are responsible. The assumption that vaccination equals bona fide immunity has never been supported by the evidence itself. We have previously reported on a growing body of evidence that even when a vaccine is mandated, and 99% of a population receive the measles vaccines, outbreaks not only happen, but as compliance increases vaccine resistance sporadic outbreaks also increase -- a clear indication of vaccine failure.

There is also the concerning fact that according to the MMR vaccine's manufacturer Merck's own product insert, the MMR can cause measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), a rare but potentially lethal form of brain infection with measles. For more information you can review a case report on MIBE caused by vaccine strain measles published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in 1999 titled "Measles inclusion-body encephalitis caused by the vaccine strain of measles virus."

Global Measles Vaccine Failures Increasingly Reported

China is not the only country dealing with outbreaks in near universally vaccinated populations. Between 2008-2011, France reported over 20,000 cases of measles, with adolescents and young adults accounting for more than half of cases.[4] Remarkably, these outbreaks began when France was experiencing some of their highest coverage rates in history. For instance, in 2008, the MMR1 coverage reached 96.6% in children 11 years of age. For a more extensive review of measles outbreaks in vaccinated populations read our article The 2013 Measles Outbreak: A Failing Vaccine, Not A Failure to Vaccinate.

Given that clinical evidence, case reports, epidemiological studies, and even the vaccine manufacturer's own product warnings, all show directly or indirectly that MMR can spread measles infection, how can we continue to stand by and let the media, government and medical establishment blame the non-vaccinated on these outbreaks without any concrete evidence?

AND

Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Gov. Researchers Confirm
October 26th 2018
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018
Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/measles-transmitted-vaccinated-gov-researchers-confirm)

Research reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can also spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it - doubly disproving that the administration of multiple doses of MMR vaccine is "97% effective," as widely claimed.

One of the fundamental errors in thinking about measles vaccine effectiveness is that receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine equates to bona fide immunity against measles virus. Indeed, it is commonly claimed by health organizations like the CDC that receiving two doses of the MMR vaccine is "97 percent effective in preventing measles," despite a voluminous body of contradictory evidence from epidemiology and clinical experience.

This erroneous thinking has led the public, media and government alike to attribute the origin of measles outbreaks, such as the one reported at Disney in 2015 (and which lead to the passing of SB277 that year, stripping vaccine exemptions for all but medical reasons in California), to the non-vaccinated, even though 18% of the measles cases occurred in those who had been vaccinated against it -- hardly the vaccine's two-dose claimed "97% effectiveness." The vaccine's obvious fallibility is also indicated by the fact that that the CDC now requires two doses.

But the problems surrounding the failing MMR vaccine go much deeper. First, they carry profound health risks (over 25 of which we have indexed here: MMR vaccine dangers), including increased autism risk, which a senior CDC scientist confessed his agency covered up, which do not justify the risk, given that measles is not only not deadly but confers significant health benefits that have been validated in the biomedical literature. Second, not only does the MMR vaccine fail to consistently confer immunity, but those who have been "immunized" with two doses of MMR vaccine can still transmit the infection to others -- a phenomena no one is reporting on in the rush to blame the non- or minimally-vaccinated for the outbreak.

MMR Vaccinated Can Still Spread Measles
Three years ago, a groundbreaking study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, whose authorship included scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).

This finding even aroused the attention of mainstream news reporting, such as this Sciencemag.org article from April 2014 titled "Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time."

Titled, "Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011," the groundbreaking study acknowledged that, "Measles may occur in vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented."

In order to find out if measles vaccine compliant individuals are capable of being infected and transmitting the infection to others, they evaluated suspected cases and contacts exposed during a 2011 measles outbreak in NYC. They focused on one patient who had received two doses of measles-containing vaccine and found that,

"Of 88 contacts, four secondary cases were confirmed that had either two doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All cases had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response."

Their remarkable conclusion:

"This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice vaccinated individual. The clinical presentation and laboratory data of the index were typical of measles in a naïve individual. Secondary cases had robust anamnestic antibody responses. No tertiary cases occurred despite numerous contacts. This outbreak underscores the need for thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected measles cases regardless of vaccination status."

Did you follow that? A twice-vaccinated individual, from a NYC measles outbreak, was found to have transmitted measles to four of her contacts, two of which themselves had received two doses of MMR vaccine and had prior presumably protective measles IgG antibody results.

This phenomenon -- the MMR vaccine compliant infecting other MMR vaccine compliant cases – has been ignored by health agencies and the media. This data corroborates the possibility that, during the Disney measles outbreak the previously vaccinated (any of the 18% known to have become infected) may have become infected or already were shedding measles from a vaccine and transmitted measles to both the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated.

Moreover, these CDC and NYC Bureau of Immunization scientists identified a 'need' for there to be "thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected measles cases regardless of vaccination status," i.e. investigators must rule out vaccine failure and infection by fully infected individuals as contributing to measles outbreaks.

Instead, what's happening now is that the moment a measles outbreak occurs, a reflexive 'blame the victim' attitude is assumed, and the media and/or health agencies report on the outbreak as if it has been proven the afflicted are under or non-vaccinated – often without sufficient evidence to support these claims. Clearly stakeholders in the vaccine/non-vaccine debate need to look at the situation through the lens of the evidence itself and not science by proclamation or pleas to authority.

Amazingly, the truth has been suppressed for decades. Twenty years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. Scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it. The MMR vaccine's manufacturer Merck's own product insert, the MMR can cause measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), a rare but potentially lethal form of brain infection with measles. Learn more by reading my article on the topic, "The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm."

Stop Blaming A Failing Vaccine on Failure to Vaccinate
The moral of the story is that you can't blame non-vaccinating parents for the morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases when vaccination does not result in immunity and does not keep those who are vaccinated from infecting others. In fact, outbreaks secondary to measles vaccine failure and shedding in up to 99% immunization compliant populations have happened for decades. Here are just a few examples reported in the medical literature:

1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, "An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced." They concluded: "We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune."1

1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, "A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures," an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: "This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy."2

1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, "early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity ... due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: "...measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations."3

1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was "largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage," but following an extensive review the researchers concluded "Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.4

1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.5

1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, "[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised." Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.6

There are plenty of other examples of the measles vaccine's abject failure, including a study published in PLoS titled, "Difficulties in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination," which brought to light the glaring ineffectiveness of two measles vaccines (measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) ) in fulfilling their widely claimed promise of preventing outbreaks in highly vaccine compliant populations. We dove deeply into the implications of this study in our article titled, "Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?"

The most recent example was released on the CDC's website today in a report titled, "Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population — Israel, July–August 2017," where they describe a patient zero who had received three doses of MMR. Not unsurprisingly the CDC does not draw the obvious conclusion that the MMR vaccine failed, rather, that they should consider the measles a possibility when they examine a patient with fever and a rash even when the patient is vaccinated.

Source: CDC

These seven outbreaks are by no means exhaustive of the biomedical literature, but illustrate just how misled the general public is about the effectiveness of measles vaccines, and the CDC's vaccination agenda in general. No amount of historical ignorance will erase the fact that vaccination does not equal immunization; antigenicity does not equal immunogenicity. Nor are the unintended, adverse effects of MMR and other vaccines in the CDC schedule accurately portrayed, precluding access to the medical ethical principle of informed consent.

To learn more about this topic read my previous article, "The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm."

Delight

1st May 2019, 00:52

To the extent that when trying to explain what seems to be a NO BRAINER of a threat that is dire and people just look back blankly and then turn away, I think they have been lost to the Vogons

Vogons are one of the most unpleasant races in the galaxy. Not evil, but bad-tempered, bureaucratic, officious and callous. They wouldn't even lift a finger to save their own grandmothers from the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal without orders signed in triplicate, sent in, sent back, queried, lost, found, subjected to public inquiry, Iost again and finally buried in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters. They can't think or imagine. They just run things.

NZHj_YZQlUM

Amazing Polly
Published on Mar 8, 2019
Intro to the psychotic Billionaires who are bringing in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Black Pill supreme.
I will likely snap out of this mood but right now this is where I'm at with it.

Between AI, robots, 5G, the Sustainability Agenda, mind control,
3D printing, crypto and utterly insane, deluded billionaires we are in some serious trouble.

kxJFGQy2tUo

Is there any hope of a backlash of greater awakenings and hunger for the newly censored truth?

VACCINE CENSORSHIP BACKFIRING…WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT
3/3/2019 (https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/vaccine-censorship-backfiringwhat-to-expect-next)

Representatives from government and the corporate media will have you believe that due to an unsensational number of measles cases in the U.S., the fabric of American society must take historically dangerous and authoritarian measures. According to both media and government talking points, in order to combat an ambiguous specter of ‘misinformation,’ America must rapidly sink into a communist-slanting, medical corporatocracy. In the age of information, is censorship really that effective?

In 2003 Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress photographs of her residence in Malibu, California. Her efforts had the exact opposite effect by inadvertently drawing further public attention to it. The phenomenon is now coined the Streisand effect whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the internet.

Channeling his inner Joseph McCarthy, Rep. Adam Schiff decided to weigh-in on parents sharing dissenting vaccine information online. Rep. Schiff, in a letter to Amazon head Jeff Bezos, employed his own vaccine misinformation to suggest the e-commerce giant censor certain vaccine-centered videos and books on its site. Schiff writes, "There is no evidence to suggest that vaccines cause life-threatening or disabling diseases…” Unfortunately, there are entire books written on the topic of vaccine injury, its biological mechanisms, and the “vaccine court” which has paid out over $4B in compensation awards for injuries and deaths at the hands of vaccination.

Amazon jumped at Schiff’s anti-American suggestion by hiding or demoting dissenting vaccine books and videos on its search engines and removing the streaming options for the documentary and Amazon best seller Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe.

Is the censorship working? Author and co-founder of Generation Rescue J.B. Handley reported that before calls for censorship these past weeks, his book How To End The Autism Epidemic hovered around #5,000 on Amazon’s Best Seller list. At the time of this writing his book has raced to #106. Handley’s book is also #1 in the book categories of Immunology, Disability Parenting, and Popular Child Psychology.

Meanwhile, another popular book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History by Suzanne Humphries MD and Roman Bystrianyk has similarly raced to #33 on Amazon’s Best Seller list in addition to grabbing the #1 slots in the book categories of History of Medicine, History, and Viral Diseases. As for the film documentary Vaxxed, at the time of this writing it is currently ranked #9 in Amazon’s overall ranking of Movies & TV behind such titles as the 7-time Oscar-nominated A Star Is Born and 4-time Oscar-winning Bohemian Rhapsody.

Facebook, Pinterest, and YouTube have also announced internal methods they are now employing to censor vaccine speech on their platforms. Articles and accounts who adhere to the limited and insulting talking points protecting Big Pharma’s vaccine products from proper scrutiny and science will rank higher in people’s Facebook feeds. As Vox writes, “These moves are encouraging for one reason: Misinformation about vaccines is dangerous.” The irony of witnessing a slew of journalists and media outlets promoting and celebrating censorship is not lost.

One place that the educated public and the censorship authoritarians see eye to eye on is that vaccine misinformation is dangerous. However, the lion’s share of such misinformation appears to be created and disseminated by the U.S. government and its regulatory agencies which is then parroted by media and mainstream medical bodies. Vaccine injury denier Rep. Schiff claiming “There is no evidence to suggest that vaccines cause life-threatening or disabling diseases…” came after the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Anthony Fauci’s lie heard around the world. Fauci recently gave testimony in front of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. A committee whose pre-hearing memorandum brief written by Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. contained vaccine misinformation which was pointed out to him prior to the hearing by the group Physicians for Informed Consent to no avail.

Under oath and subject to the penalties set forth in title 18, section 1001 of the U.S. Code, Fauci was asked by Rep. Brett Guthrie if the measles vaccine can cause encephalitis. Despite the encephalitis warning being listed on the MMR II’s package insert as well as being on the table of vaccine injuries recognized for compensation in vaccine court by the Health Resources and Services Administration, Fauci said “no.” In short, Fauci lied. If it wasn’t for the slew of parents seated behind Fauci who then loudly voiced their disapproval, there would likely have been no correction. As it were, Fauci felt the pressure and then shouted out “rare” before Rep. DeGette had to bang a gavel to restore order.

Once the hearing concluded, Fauci scrambled to gather his belongings and exit the committee to a overwhelming and constant barrage of parents expressing their discontent for his underhandedness. Martha Stewart, General Michael Flynn, and George Papadopoulos were each charged, under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001, with lying to federal government agents. With sweeping censorship happening and over 100 active vaccine-related bills in 30 states, Fauci’s lie was capable of influencing the decision of the committee to which it was addressed. Will legal action be pursued?

The mad rush to pass legislation at the state level to eliminate all non-medical vaccine exemptions has seen record turnout against the bills. Testimonies across the country are being given by doctors, scientists and parents methodically dissecting every angle of inconvenient truth surrounding the unsettled vaccine science and broken government oversight apparatus. Roughly half of the over 100 active vaccine bills are aimed at expanding and protecting the people’s rights, informed consent, and vaccine exemptions.

The heavy-handed move to censor and demote all dissenting vaccine information running counter to Big Pharma’s limited talking points couldn’t come at a worse time. Untold numbers of families have already had experiences with vaccine injury and have been indiscriminately labeled anti-vaxers for years by media and government agencies when they speak out. In addition, it is now public information that both the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) along with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have long-abdicated their duties to ensure vaccine safety and oversight.

The FDA was legally forced to admit that it granted approval to both the inactivated influenza and TdaP vaccine for use in pregnant women without any clinical trials and safety studies enrolling pregnant women. In addition, HHS was legally forced to admit that it could not produce 30 years of periodic reports showing the agency had fulfilled it Congressional mandate to “promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions than those vaccines on the market…” and to “make or assure improvements in…the manufacturing, testing, warning, field surveillance, adverse reaction reporting and researching on vaccines in order to reduce the risk of adverse reactions to vaccines.” Furthermore, HHS was also unable to provide sufficient answers and missing scientific proof vaccines are safe, to show pre-licensure vaccine safety testing was done properly, to show improvements in adverse event surveillance, and many other basic tenets of the claimed settled vaccine science.

Hearings in D.C. along with inappropriate public comments by FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb have signaled a possible overarching U.S. government play to trample state’s rights and current active legislation to eliminate all non-medical vaccine exemptions. However, the federal government has no power to mandate vaccines or tell states what to do on the issue. The U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment dictates that all powers not delegated to the federal government are retained by the states or the people. Even the Supreme Court has recognized vaccine mandates as a state issue.

As the censorship continues to creep from the government organs, social media giants, and pharmaceutically-influenced media outlets, the public is signaling a growing hunger for the truth about vaccines beyond canned talking points. Unfortunately, the above listed entities have refused to leave the comfort of their limited echo-chamber rhetoric of ‘settled science’ and vaccine injury denial. With all other factors remaining the same, expect an inverse relationship as increases in multilevel vaccine censorship drive greater awakenings and hunger for the newly censored truth about vaccines.

Delight

1st May 2019, 01:52

In other countries, compliance with mandatory vaccination and "real ID" are aligning.... tip toe, closer and closer Can it happen here?

ARGENTINA’S NEW VACCINE LAW BLUEPRINT FOR AMERICAN REAL ID (https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/argentinas-new-vaccine-law-blueprint-for-american-real-id)
1/13/2019

Colombian law 1626 was introduced in 2013. Bureaucratic language approved by a handful of senators established that HPV vaccination was “free and mandatory.” What followed was widespread injuries to girls who received an HPV shot which was never safety tested against a saline placebo and includes a scientifically problematic and controversial aluminum adjuvant. The authorities and health officials in the country deemed that any and all serious side effects experienced after the HPV vaccine were part of mass hysteria collectively experienced by the teenage girls. A ‘blame the victim’ stance was also implemented by health authorities in Ireland, Denmark, Japan, and other countries whose HPV vaccine rollout triggered massive injuries to teenage girls. Communities, such as Carmen de Bolívar, were torn apart by the injuries as the girls were left to suffer by a callous and complacent Colombian medical community.

In mid-December of 2018 Argentina unanimously passed its vaccine law through both cambers of congress without debate, political discussion and seeing just one negative vote against it. Learning nothing from the ongoing Colombian HPV issues, the new Argentinian law forces their entire 20 vaccine schedule upon its population of both children and adults. Using nearly identical talking points as seen in Colombia, the Argentinian bill’s author Dr. Pablo Yedlin boasted on Twitter, “They [vaccines] are free, they are your right and your obligation”

The law is perhaps the most overarching example seen to date of how invasive a government can become by forcing a medical intervention [vaccines] with questionable safety profiles onto its people. The recently approved law indicates “certification of compliance with the National Vaccination Calendar must be required” including for passports, driver’s licenses and National Identity Documents (DNI).

Argentinean media reports that the procedure of any identification document is not going to be interrupted for not having vaccines up to date, but that these procedures will serve as “control points” so that people comply with the corresponding vaccination. In Yedlin’s hometown of Tucuman, the media states, “…in order to facilitate universal coverage, in his province, Tucuman, vaccinators are being installed in some of the places where the DNI is obtained. In this way, those people who lack a vaccine may do so when they complete the paperwork, if they wish.”

The law goes even further to establish that there be mandatory advertisements and that all public health policies must be published and promoted in the media. It also establishes advantages of tax management for vaccines to clear customs by removing value added taxes and withholdings to shipments of vaccines that arrive in Argentinean ports.

Is America immune from the sweeping authoritarian moves being experienced in Argentina? In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, The REAL ID Act was passed by Congress in 2005 and enacted the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation that the Federal Government “set standards for the issuance of sources of identification, such as driver's licenses.” The US Department of Homeland Security states:

“Starting October 1, 2020, every state and territory resident will need to present a REAL ID compliant license/ID, or another acceptable form of identification, for accessing Federal facilities, entering nuclear power plants, and boarding commercial aircraft. This is what we call “card-based” enforcement.”

The government REAL ID mandate at the federal level requires the use of face biometric standards that allows for facial recognition and authentication of users. Radio host Robert Scott Bell was recently interviewed about the REAL ID by Del Bigtree on The HightWire. Bell, entering his twentieth year in broadcasting, has followed the progression of the REAL ID since its inception in 2005 and he warned, “The head of the Department of Homeland Security has the ability under this law to continue to expand, without congressional oversight, what laws and rules apply to this REAL ID.”

The disease prevention and health promotion arm of the US Department of Health and Human Services put forth the federal initiative Healthy People 2020. Its goal has been set to have from seventy to ninety-five percent coverage of all childhood and adult vaccinations by the year 2020. Bell commented, “We could see an expansion into limiting your ability to travel if you are not fully vaccinated. Tie this into Health People 2020 mandates where they’re looking to go into adult mandates for vaccination.”

Adult mandates for vaccination in the US have been slow to take hold compared to the Argentina blitzkrieg. Due to sustained and increasing resistance, vaccine injury deniers in government, often backed by or working with vaccine makers, have been hamstrung to get laws passed requiring vaccination for school entry. The major US effort to target adults with mandatory and coercive vaccination has been at the medical level by targeting nurses. However, even that attempt has been picked apart and ruled to be unreasonable and ineffective.

The people of Argentina are now under siege by a medical-industrial complex that is actively forcing invasive medical products [vaccines] of questionable value upon them. The slow, boiling frog process experienced in the US of incrementally eroding individual and parental rights with state laws, tracking systems and continual media propaganda has been abandoned in Argentina as their leadership has gone for broke. The desperation appears clear that medical systems are desperately trying to keep people locked into a limited healing paradigm.

Last year, Argentina tried and failed to ban home-birth. Such a move should have alerted the population that authoritarian lawmakers did not have their best interests in mind. The population now faces a major uphill battle to dislodge the predatory pharmaceutical industry and its forced vaccine mandates from their country. With history as a guide, it is important for the Argentinian people to act rapidly before the widespread vaccine reactions are experienced by their people. Without action now, future vaccine-injured Argentinians will be simply ignored, labeled antivaxers and rendered invisible by their media, government and medical community. Argentina now faces two possible futures to either become a courageous example of how a country reclaimed its health sovereignty from authoritarian vaccine mandates or the cautionary tale of the new high water mark of how far a pharmaceutically-captured government will go to force products on their people.

Delight

1st May 2019, 05:41

It is really weird because I have been feeling a rising sense of hatred within me but at the SYSTEMS, not people.

It does already frighten me to imagine a world where one is FORCED to agree to anything. It is painful to hear so many like the people testifying in this video who want to force all medical exemptions to be determined by public health and only cover certain categories of issues.

Richard Pan is the personification of all that I despise.

eF3EgmyOAA4

I feel we are all facing such an insanely perverse inversion of what is valuable. I don't know if what Mike Adams thinks is so, is exactly true. But IMO it is possible that there is a depopulation plan?

I am not a leftist or rightest or any political partiest. I want a world that works for all living beings.

Mike Adams does represent the rage that is felt by many, the frustration that no matter what we say, the bills are passed. It is all irrational and insufferable.

n this video we will be talking about the ultimate end game—the real goal of those who are controlling the narratives, controlling the media, controlling the language through political correctness, controlling what you are able to see or hear or speak or think through tech giants and the social media platforms.
What you are seeing, what you are living through—and it's time you really woke up to this—is a mind game to push humanity into annihilation.

http://counterthink.com/2019-04-22-the-annihilation-agenda.html

What is REALLY eerie is that in the video placed below, Mike Adams talks about "Globalists' who think that anyone stupid enough to agree to mandatory vaccination is deserving of the (what he thinks is planned) "kill switch". Last night as I was just thinking about all of this, the idea came to me that we would be absolutely STUPID to just follow the rules. Then I was thinking about how to leave the systems that insist we must line up.

The goal of mandatory vaccine policies is to train the population to embrace "automatic compliance" with all government-mandated immunizations. Once fully indoctrinated, the masses will happily line up to be injected with the "kill switch" euthanasia vaccines that are engineered with biological weapons to depopulate the planet.

Stay informed if you want to live.Vaccine mandates are OBEDIENCE training for mass euthanasia (https://healthrangerreport.com/vaccine-mandates-are-obedience-training-for-mass-euthanasia)

divb509lz8Q

Delight

1st May 2019, 06:25

One more video about the legislation that is pending. Colorado bill HB 19-1312 issues identified by a thoughtful person. This one requires mandatory vaccination for all children and parents would have to go before a board for an exemption and say they know they are endangering their child.

EN7OZKefNNY

Tintin

1st May 2019, 12:25

@Delight: thanks very much for this wealth of very interesting information.

This arrived in my inbox from Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-04-30-measle-infected-baby-photos-faked-by-nbc-news-mass-hysteria.html) and the video accompanying the article makes for interesting viewing.

Measle-infected baby photos FAKED by NBC News to push mass hysteria and demand vaccine compliance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaB4go7SPaI

frankstien

1st May 2019, 18:27

Bombshell Flashback: Merck FAKED mumps vaccine research, released faulty vaccine that didn’t work, say virologists in False Claims Act filing

With the deceptive “mainstream” media now running measles hysteria 24/7, you might be shocked to learn that the MMR vaccine doesn’t work as claimed. Even Reuters is now reporting that 10% of those infected with the measles were previously vaccinated against the measles.

In a bombshell flashback, we examine the False Claims Act filing where two virologists working for Merck say the vaccine manufacturer faked efficacy data to trick the FDA into approving their vaccines. This is why so many people who received vaccines are being infected with the measles.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-01-merck-faked-mumps-vaccine-research-released-faulty-vaccine.html

Bob

1st May 2019, 19:08

Delight

2nd May 2019, 01:56

Cranial nerve problems are subtle consequences of the attack and assault from neurotoxins (as in the aluminum adjuvants of vaccines)

May 1, 2019
Forrest Maready is an independent historical writer, who has had a career in the film industry as an engineer, editor, composer and animator. While in the technology industry he designed and developed the visual effects software at NextGlass. He is the creator of the popular video series "My Incredible Opinion" and VaxBaby. During the past several years Forrest has been researching some of he engimatic riddles in science and medicine -- notably the history of autism and polio. He recently published an important and highly recommended book on the history associating vaccines with autism, which reads more like a detective novel, "The Autism Vaccine: The Story of Modern Medicine's Greatest Tragedy."

The Gary Null Show - The beginning of the autism epidemic — one of modern medicine’s greatest tragedies (https://thegarynullshow.podbean.com/)
starts at 15:45

Wise Traditions
Published on Dec 3, 2018
It is increasingly common for children to develop strange rashes, eczema, eye and speech problems, and the like that seem to appear out of the blue. Doctors seem flummoxed, unable to explain what's happening with our kids. Autism, allergies, and autoimmune conditions are on the rise. And, again, there are few answers. Author and medical researcher Forrest Maready has spent years examining the evidence that is staring us in the face. His “Crooked” theory postulates that toxins are attacking our brain stem, leading to a number of mystery ailments that often leave tell-tale traces on our faces. He makes the case, on today's podcast, that aluminum and the injudicious use of antibiotics are making our children vulnerable to serious health conditions. With insight and compassion, Forrest explains what we can do to shore up their health and protect future generations.

45Zzsg_uibk

1uRtkqDvfkY

Forsaken Generation Radio Show
Published on Mar 21, 2018
Forrest Maready was born in Wilmington, N.C and grew up around a large film studio and the many movies and TV shows that filmed there. After receiving religion and music degrees from Wake Forest University, he plied his trade in the film and television industry for 13 years, working as an editor, audio engineer, visual effects artist or composer on two Muppet movies, Dawson’s Creek, Varsity Blues and many other productions He maintains a popular Facebook and YouTube series called “My Incredible Opinion” where he opines on the hubris of human beings. Forrest Lives in North Carolina with his Wife Son & Dog.

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler Ph.D. is the CEO and Director of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, which exists to conduct research in the public interest without a profit motive. A life-long biomedical researcher, he is best known for contributions to advances in medical bioinformatics, and for his three books, “Ebola: An Evolving Story,” (2016) “Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research,” (2016) and “The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism” (2017). A true-blue academic, he has directed the analysis of data from over 100 medical studies, served as Founding Editor-in-Chief of the journal Cancer Informatics, serves on the Editorial Board of Cancer Research, He lives in Western PA with his two well-adjusted teen-aged sons and his fiance. He blog jameslyonsweiler.com contains a deep analysis of the issue that confronts us today on the mismatches that exist between biomedical science and public health policy. IPAK can be visited at ipaknowledge.org

7ImC6Y4ABlI

https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Vaccinations-as-a-Cause-of-Spine-Face-Eye-Asymmetry-3.jpg
VACCINATIONS AS A CAUSE OF SPINE, FACE & EYE ASYMMETRY
By Erwin Alber

July 23, 2013

Between May 2003 and May 2006, Germany’s highest health authority the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) conducted a large scale survey named KIGGS to assess the physical and mental health of children and youths up to the age of 17. The study comprised 17,641 children and gathered an enormous amount of data, including their vaccination status.

Private citizens were able to obtain the raw data for a fee, which enabled Angelika Kögel-Schauz (now Angelika Müller) to make a statistical assessment of the information pertaining to vaccination, a topic she has a long-standing interest in. She has published the results in her article ‘Impfen macht krank‘. This is the English translation of the article:

– Large German Study Proves That Vaccine Free Children Are Healthier!
http://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/large-german-study-proves-that-vaccine-free-children-are-healthier/

The results of her investigation clearly show and confirm that vaccine-free children are healthier than vaccinated children. A scoliosis, which is an abnormal curvature of the spine, was e.g. found in 5.3% of vaccinated children, while among the vaccine-free children the number of scoliosis cases was zero, which from a statistical viewpoint is a highly significant finding.

Vaccines are neurotoxic, meaning they have a particularly detrimental effect on the nervous system, including the brain. If a nerve or nerves going to the muscles which hold the spine in place are damaged by vaccines, the spine is pulled out of alignment, resulting in an abnormal curvature of the spine (scoliosis).
VACCINATIONS AS A CAUSE OF SPINE, FACE & EYE ASYMMETRY (https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccination-as-a-cause-of-spine-face-and-eye-asymmetry/)read here

Hervé

2nd May 2019, 02:37

For the original seminal research and analyses leading to the above dissemination videos, see this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283854&viewfull=1#post1283854) and this one (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283985&viewfull=1#post1283985)...

Delight

2nd May 2019, 05:42

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler PhD
The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge
CEO/Director
ALLISON PARK, PA | United States

Why I Use the Term “Fascism” – and Why I Am Unafraid To Do So (https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2019/04/16/why-i-use-the-term-fascism-and-why-i-am-unafraid-to-do-so/)
jameslyonsweiler in Cures April 16, 2019

WHEN GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATIONS WORK TOGETHER to advance and perpetuate their power and wealth at the cost of the average citizen’s well-being, we have a few terms that we can use. Some use “corporatism”, but, in a capitalist society, being pro-corporation has a positive sheen. It’s intermingled with being “pro-American”.

The corporatism that has a stranglehold on our regulatory bodies has occured via a process call “regulatory capture”, which means nothing less that a take-over of certain arms of the executive branch of government. Regulatory agency directors are appointed, not elected, and thus pro-corporate policies can take hold and stay in place as long as the officials in the agency remain in place. That’s why CDC can get away with scientific fraud, with not doing the right science, or even with not doing more of the wrong science. They are guarding the bodies – and this will eventually be their legacy: criminals acting at the behest of corrupt and greedy corporations hiding behing the guise of protecting public health, when, in reality, they are protecting contracts for aging and increasingly ineffective vaccines.

One step that is taken by fascist dictators is to dissolve the separatation of powers. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (aka “Vaccine Court”) is administered by the HHS. They are an arm of the executive branch that expresses HHS (executive) policy. This is wrong. There is a move afoot to increase the use of “Special Masters”in many areas of law that impact liability – and when corporations write the rules, they remove themselves as defendants, make the government the defendant, and the corporatist government arm that is the defendant (as HHS is in every vaccine injury case), the defendant oversees the “judges”. That turns my stomach.

Every American citizen whose grandfather- or grandmother- fought European fascism in World War II should bristle and act upon how corporations have all but consumed US regulatory agencies. Those who stand to profit from this neofascism actually applaud regulatory capture. But in a US in which corporations can make unlimited donations to political candidates, including via dark-money organizations and SUPER PACS, either we work to change the rules, or will submit to a new form of government of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation.

It’s all too easy to throw the term “fascism” across party lines, as if undue corporate influences that better the position of candidates in one party is more evil than the same level of undue corporate influences that better the positions of candidates in another party. As fascists keep the people separated and confused along “party lines” defined by token divisive variations on social norms, partisans tend to fall into the trap of demonizing their fellow citizens across party lines without being able to see the puppet strings of those who want to keep the populus separated, numb and uninformed to the chronic pilfering of our wealth, and our health.

I honestly wonder if modern fascists realize they are fascists?

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

4/16/2019

Allison Park, PA

Waning Immunogenicity, Vaccine-Driven Evolution and Hyperimmunization: We Can No Longer Deny the Obvious (https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2019/04/03/waning-immunogenicity-vaccine-driven-evolution-and-hyperimmunization-we-can-no-longer-deny-the-obvious/)
jameslyonsweiler
in Cures April 3, 2019

NB: This article was originally published on Medium but that account was silenced following publication.

“GET YOUR VACCINES! HERD IMMUNITY! You anti-vaxxers are putting other people at risk!”

This level of ‘debate’ is an emotional appeal to fear and is a form of coercion.

In reality, many current vaccines have reached the limit of their usefulness, and there is no hiding it.

Worse, some current vaccines may make the vaccinated more susceptible to infection from the very pathogens they were designed to immunize against- or other pathogens that the vaccine does not target.

I’ve looked at toxicity of metals like aluminum and mercury in great detail and find a great deal of support in the scientific literature for serious issues with injection of thimerosal and aluminum. Tens of thousands of hours and two and half papers later, we have a viable theory for how vaccines can cause autism, and we have a determination that a series of mistakes have led to doses of aluminum in vaccines that are intolerably unsafe for some.

I’m now of the opinion that if you are partaking of aluminum-containing vaccines, you should never accept a thimerosal-containing vaccine due to additive toxicity. And if one does choose to vaccinate with aluminum-containing vaccines, one should never accept a thimerosal-containing vaccine due to synergistic toxicity. I’m also of the opinion that digging up metals and injecting them into our newborns and our expectant mothers is, well, quite possibly the most stupid idea from medicine. Ever.

I am sharing bluntly from an informed position. My forthcoming review on the role of aluminum and mercury in autism has 250 references, all supporting a key role of vaccine metals in inducing — with the help of some inherited and de novo mutations — ER Hyperstress. Our just-published reconsideration of aluminum study took over a year in peer review — the editor graciously handled the process and the paper was vetted in the end, by an additional three independent reviewers. There is no question in my mind that there is too much aluminum in the CDC vaccine schedule for some, and there is no credible basis for the dosing of aluminum in vaccines, period. This is not hyperbole, we did the math.

The Flu Vaccine Makes Us More Susceptible to Acute Infections from Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses

Studies are confirming that vaccination against the flu virus leads to increased rates of respiratory infections by non-influenza viruses. See, for example, Rikin et al., 2018 who wrote “Among children there was an increase in the hazard of ARI caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens post-influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period. and “Post-vaccination risk of non-influenza respiratory pathogen was higher in children”. This is in the journal VACCINES.

This finding confirms the work of Ben Cowling and colleagues from 2012: Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza.

See Rikin et al (2018) Vaccine 36:1958-1964 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525279

Public health policy around influenza must change so deaths due to “flu-like illnesses” are no longer considered deaths due to influenza. Every cadaver should be swabbed for an exact determination of the virus(es) involved — again, another policy update needed. Americans deserve to know what they are dying from.

But the issue for today is waning immunity. Emblazoned across CNN’s website— complete with a video that includes artificial immunization 101, sure to tell you serious side effects are rare.

“Mumps outbreaks linked to waning vaccine protection, study says” is the headline. But no problem, goes the article, because ACIP has recommended another MMR booster. The article claims that mumps symptoms are reduced by the vaccine. But it skips over the smoking guns in the room, including the major whistleblower lawsuit against Merck for allegedly faking the efficacy of the mumps portion of the vaccine. If you believe the whistleblowers, the MMR vaccine is only 18% effective against the Jeryl Lynn type — so the efficacy must be even lower against the circulating types due to 55 years of antigen drift.

What’s causing waning immunity in vaccines?

The flu vaccine, we were told, was only 10–18% effective this year. I’ve analyzed trends of flu vaccine efficacy and found that higher vaccine uptake in any given two years is associated with decreased efficacy of the vaccine in the next year. I’m convinced that part of that is immune system compromise due to the effects of thimerosal on the protein ERAP1 — which is essential for proper shortening of immune proteins.

The other problem is that viruses evolve. They experience mutations in the wild — and the strains in the vaccines experience mutations in the cultures in which they are grown. The mumps vaccine uses the Jeryl Lynn strain of mumps — isolated from a throat culture of the daughter of Dr. Maurice Hilleman in 1963.

The virus used was isolated from Jeryl Lynn during her obviously non-fatal mumps infection.
Fifty-five years later, we’re seeing mumps outbreaks involving fully vaccinated individuals. At Syracuse University, every student was up-to-date on the vaccines. The canceling of sports events raised the ire of fans of the Orangemen.

To calculate the number of mutational differences between the 2018 circulating strains and the 1955 strain should be straightforward — sequence the stored isolates and sequence the currently circulated strains. In mumps, this has been done every year — and while overall the predicted amino acid sequences are very similar, for some wild type mumps isolates, protein divergence from the Jeryl Lynn strain are much higher- with divergence as high as 15% (See example study here). Faster divergence in some proteins than others is confirmed in a study conducted on isolates in China.

But, as I’ve said about Ebola — it’s not the rate, it’s the mutation. A series of individual mutations, or a single mutation could render the MMR significantly less effective than it had been in previous years. Or, a new strain of the mumps could come into prominence due to the efficacy of the mumps vaccine.

The disease burden from vaccination is not adequately assessed. Here are some facts worth considering:

(1) Vaccine Adverse Event Are 100- to 1,000-fold Under-reported.. or More. An automated system designed to capture vaccine adverse events was developed and abandoned by CDC after discovery of the massive increase in reporting of adverse events. The creators of the system, which is called ESP-VAERS, reported that only 1% of adverse events are typically detected by VAERS, the passive system for reporting vaccine adverse events.

(2) Live Vaccine Types Can Directly Cause Disease. Persistent infection of mumps wild-type virus (Jeryl Lynn 5 mumps virus) has been detected in cases of chronic encephalitis. (See Morfopoulou et al.) This evidence is as strong as the evidence used by CDC to conclude that Zika contributed to microcephaly in Brazil.

(3) Whooping Cough Bug Persists in Vaccinated Medical Professionals.Medical professionals, including pediatricians, who vaccinate every ten years against pertussis may be the reservoir of wild-type infectious because they are not immune to B. pertussis, the bacterium that causes whooping cough-they just show no symptoms. (See my article at World Mercury Project). Medical professionals should be swabbed every Monday morning for asymptomatic B. pertussis infection.

(5) Type Replacement is Real. Type replacement is accepted in influenza, and always has been. It is denied by CDC to be occurring in HPV vaccinated populations, in spite of the fact that most studies show type replacement (See my article on this in Epoch Times). The CDC’s own study (Markovitz et al. (2016)) found no net change in overall HPV infection rates after the 4-valent HPV vaccines came to market but somehow concluded that their data did not support type replacement.

We at IPAK have re-analyzed the Markovitz study data in the simplest manner possible to ask a very simple question: Was there a significant shift in the prevalence of non-vaccine targeted types after the introduction of the 4-valent HPV vaccine? Recall that Markovitz et al. (2016) concluded that no type replacement had occurred after the HPV 4-valent vaccine had been brought to market.

The study data were ambiguously labeled with a column “non-4v HPV” but a close read of the text points to “Any HPV” — “4v HPV” vs. “non-4v HPV” as the data of interest to use in a 2 x 2 contingency test. We used Fisher’s exact test on counts (not frequencies). Counts were estimated from the prevalence data, data are represented as percentages for clarity.

Here is the result:

CDC Study Actually Supports Type Replacement in HPV Vaccinated Populations
Fisher’s exact test on the count data was significant at p<0.0001.

This means that for HPV, type replacement is real. Due to using weak statistical testing, when more powerful tests are available, CDC can be considered culpable for new infections that occur when doctors tell patients “you are protected from HPV”. In my view, the Markovitz et al. paper should be retracted because it is misleading, and clinicians should warn patients that they could still be infected with rarer, potentially more dangerous types of HPV if they have other risk factors (unprotected sex, multiple sex partners, drug use, etc). To be fair, I contacted CDC some time ago and asked them to consider whether their data might necessarily show type replacement, like other studies published at that time had shown. Dr. Markovitz declined direct dialog, and an underling stopped replying after I pointed out the obvious.

In 2016, the world shifted to a new polio vaccine that was developed to increase the match between the vaccine-targeted wild type and the type in the vaccine. Viral type replacement is a form of evolution is well-accepted — that it can lead to to the circulation of hyperpathogenic strains is evident, but not well appreciated by vaccine policies.

Denial of type replacement in HPV is harmful and unscientific. And, I would add, possibly quite dangerous.

Why? First, the rarer HPV types are not harmless. In fact, host-pathogen interaction studies and models of virulence in pathogens tell us that common types of pathogens are common because they don’t kill their host. Rarer types of HPV may lead to more aggressive HPV-related cancers in younger people. This is supported by data; see, for example, this study that that HPV genotypes not targeted by quadrivalent vaccine types conferred 2.94 fold higher risk of cervical carcinoma. And rare types not targeted by the 9-valent HPV vaccine also have been found to be oncogenic.

In spite of attempts of individuals to claim that data show that HPV vaccine reduces HPV-related cancers rates, one must always read the fine-print. The studies look at surrogate outcome (CIN rates), and they often only report rates of CIN lesions associated with vaccine-targeted HPV types. We may not know if rarer types sweep into populations and increase overall HPV-related cancer rates for decades.

The second reason that HPV vaccination-induced type replacement is possibly quite dangerous is that both intra-typic and inter-typic recombination could lead to increased new types of pathogenicity. With hundreds of rare types, those that increase in frequency due to vaccination may be different in different parts of the world. Evolution is fastest in semi-divided populations with gene flow due to low migration rates and high genetic diversity within subpopulations. And recombination occurs in HPV. This study shows recombination occurring between European and African HPV types.

Interestingly, impaired normal recombination of the human genome is the virus’ cancer-causing calling card. As an evolutionary biologist, I’d say that enabling recombination among types is part of this virus’s phenotype. Evolution loves diversity. Evidence of recombination among HPV types is strong (see for example this study). And since recombination is most likely to occur between different HPV types in individuals with >1 HPV types, prevention of exposure to new HPV types in individuals who are already infected is very important.

Evidence of vaccine-driven evolution also exists for many other vaccine-targeted pathogens, including B. pertussis (See Octavia et al., 2011). Evidence of waning immunity in mumps is growing; high variation exists in the amount of serum required from any given individual to neutralize genetically diverse mumps strains. The vaccine target protein, a nucleoprotein, is a non-neutralizing target. Asymptomatic wild-type infections are known to occur in mumps after vaccination, and the age distribution of occurrence has shifted. A quick BLAST of the Jeryl Lynn nucleoprotein amino acid sequence against all mumps nucleoprotein sequences in NCBI’s Protein database reveals variation as high as 6% (in a mumps virus isolated from China). The Jeryl Lynn mumps type appears to be an immunologic outlier compared to other types of mumps. A new cluster subgroup of Genotype G seems to have driven an outbreak of mumps in Scotland in a highly vaccinated population. And molecular analysis of isolates from the current Dutch and American mumps cases point to newly emergent types with variation in the immunogenic epitopes — leading to a call for a polyvalent mumps vaccine. While a model could account for waning immunity due to a 27-year immunity, and dismissed a role for the emergence of heterologous virus genotypes, that approach begs the question of what proportion of the loss of the presumed 27-year protection is due to viral evolution. The current 18–20 year old age-class has been exposed to more doses and total amounts of injected forms of aluminum — and more immunogenic antigens from pathogens than any other class before them.

Lower-than expected efficacy of the mumps vaccine is reflected in cross-genotype seroresponse studies, has been suspected by others, and has been reported by the two Merck whistleblowers.

The rates of clinically diagnosed cases of mumps skyrocketed in Western Australia in 2015 and 2016:

Source: Vaccination Status is Not a Determinant of Susceptibility to Mumps (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo)
This explosion of cases began in April 2015, the same month in which influenza vaccines were made freely available to aboriginal peoples (see “For the First Time”, here: http://iaha.com.au/naccho-health-news-indigenous-children-now-able-to-access-free-flu-vaccine-in-australia/).

Here is the timeline of cases:

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo
And the age distribution, by Aboriginal status. The outbreak involved only the Aboriginal population — and mumps can lead to sterility, as the presenter of these images describe in this video.

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo
Clearly, the FluQuadri and FluQuadri, Jr. vaccine may have an an unforeseen effect on the aboriginal population. Hyperimmunization could be responsible. (Neither vaccine contains thimerosal, according to the vaccine manufacturer The product insert from 2015 is available via the WayBack machine.)

This is what happens when we do whole-population experimentation without informed consent and do not insist on randomized clinical trials to assess long-term safety of vaccines and vaccine schedules before unleashing them on to an uninformed, non-consented population. None of the patients — Aboriginals or not — were informed they were part of a safety testing for Sanofi-Pasteur’s new vaccine. However, additional vaccines were also used and it is possible that simultaneous administration of aluminum-containing vaccines occurred.

In general, the sources of waning immunity are likely two-fold: the damaging effects of metals in non-live vaccines on the immune system, combined with vaccine driven evolution (antigenic drift) leading to type replacement.

Discussions of “breakthrough infections” in populations vaccinated against mumps should consider the importance of individual amino acid differences in viral biology and immune escape.

It’s time for a ruling on the MMR efficacy controversy, and for research on safer and and more effective means of artificial immunization. And it’s time that governments in countries that use vaccines to inform their populations that post-marketing surveillance studies mean they are enrolled in safety studies, and that they have the right to expect that the medical professional will honor their basic human right to opt out of any such study under laws inspired by The Nuremberg Code. There are many reasons why that is the right thing to do… reason #1 for me is that, in spite of what we had all hoped, vaccines are no longer what they used to be.

You can find me on Twitter James Lyons-Weiler

and on

WordPress http://jameslyonsweiler.com

Or at work:

ipaknowledge.org
Watch for big news from IPAK in 2019! Thanks to strong public support, we have studies ongoing on aluminum dose…ipaknowledge.org
Lyons-Weiler, J and R. Ricketson. 2018. Reconsideration of the Immunotherapeutic Pediatric Safe Dose Levels of Aluminum. Journal and Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 48:67–73

http://ipaknowledge.org/Pediatric-Dosing-of-Aluminum.php

Senapati R et al. 2017. HPV genotypes co-infections associated with cervical carcinoma: Special focus on phylogenetically related and non-vaccine targeted genotypes. PLoS One. 12(11):e0187844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187844.

Delight

2nd May 2019, 07:19

I already have been listening to Tom Cowan who has written what looks to me to be a straight forward book based on new science (such as understanding of the Fourth Phase of Water outlined by Gerald Pollack)

p9UC0chfXcg

Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness
by Dr. Thomas Cowan MD (https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Autoimmunity-Changing-Childhood-Illness/dp/1603587772/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8)

One Doctor’s Surprising Answer to the Epidemic of Autoimmunity and Chronic Disease

Over the past fifty years, rates of autoimmunity and chronic disease have exploded: currently 1 in 2.5 American children has an allergy, 1 in 11 has asthma, 1 in 13 has severe food allergies, and 1 in 36 has autism. While some attribute this rise to increased awareness and diagnosis, Thomas Cowan, MD, argues for a direct causal relationship to a corresponding increase in the number of vaccines American children typically receive―approximately 70 vaccine doses by age eighteen. The goal of these vaccines is precisely what we’re now seeing in such abundance among our chronically ill children: the provocation of immune response.

Dr. Cowan looks at emerging evidence that certain childhood illnesses are actually protective of disease later in life; examines the role of fever, the gut, and cellular fluid in immune health; argues that vaccination is an ineffective (and harmful) attempt to shortcut a complex immune response; and asserts that the medical establishment has engaged in an authoritarian argument that robs parents of informed consent. His ultimate question, from the point of view of a doctor who has decades of experience treating countless children is: What are we really doing to children when we vaccinate them?

Comment regarding the book shows how close to depopulation we may become just because of vaccinations. On the OTHER hand, IF we personally approach the body and its processes with profound respect, restore natural wisdom, we could learn from this vaccination debacle.

The shocking thing I gathered from reading Dr. Cowan's book is that the US may wipe out most of its population with the same diseases (Measles and Smallpox) that killed off millions of Native Americans -- all thanks to the vaccination policy currently being followed which puts trust in the notion of herd immunity via mandatory vaccination even though vaccination does not last a lifetime.

This book is the sorry tale of bad and corrupt science told by a deeply insightful man who bravely challenges accepted wisdom and takes a second look at both faulty basic science and the medical practices it engenders. It is a short book but covers all the basics you need to know to see the mess we have gotten ourselves into: in the interests of saving our children minor suffering with acute illnesses we have condemned our whole population to a looming epidemic of lethal proportions -- by using vaccination. The book examines the how and why we got into this state but adroitly avoids making political or accusatory statements - the doctor leaves us to draw our own conclusions.

If there were a giant meteor looming in our skies governments would act to do something about it - with climate change we manage to drag our feet, do some recycling, say it may not be real and wait for government to sort it out - now we have a more personal challenge: to inform ourselves of what is true and then take action as individuals to begin to set things right. Anyone who has children or grandchildren or youngsters they care about needs to join in this debate but it's not just children who are at risk. The book's title makes it seem to be about concerns for child welfare but it's we adults who will suffer if we lose our immunity to the diseases and it won't be an itchy rash or a snotty nose we will get, it'll be something deadly.

We have been on this dangerous path for about a century now and like the road to hell it is paved with good intentions (or marketing speak of good intentions). The good news is that we just need to stop vaccinating and revise our views on childhood diseases and their treatment. Dr. Cowan shows us what to do and now it's up to us to take action. This is a brilliant straightforward book, easy to read and understand but getting people to believe the truth of it will be the difficult part.

The second path covered in this book is the slower disaster but perhaps the more inexorable one - that of the destruction of our autoimmune systems by vaccines. Although Dr Cowan has a solution to the destruction, I believe it is not one most people will choose to take: giving up starches and sugars for at least six months, maybe for years and then following his treatment regime. It is known that many diabetics will not give up sugar even under threat of losing limbs and eyesight to the disease so how will people told to rebalance their gut microbiome by the same treatment respond? Without removing toxins injected as part of vaccination and then repairing the microbiome, recovery from autoimmune disease is impossible. So many things come under the automimmune label: rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, MS, various thyroid afflictions, allergies, tiredness with loss of the joy in life, and quite possibly autism and cancer. What will a disease riddled society be like to live in? How will we afford to support and treat all those sick people?

Perhaps there will be some miracle breakthrough to make vaccines work without adjuvants, some true understanding of the two immune system responses that will enable us to trigger lifelong immunity at a cell-mediated level not just with temporary antibodies, some nanotech fix for ongoing breakdowns. But how much simpler it would be to follow Dr Cowan's analysis and advice: go back to letting children get childhood diseases and live long healthy protected lives. I want that world but I think it would take a revolution to achieve it. Reading this book is a good start.https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RGJBFM4G7671Z/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1603587772

Dr. Joseph Mercola interviews Dr. Thomas Cowan on how vaccines change the nature of childhood illnesses by distorting your immune response.

7ZsOe7x4KsM

This is very good IMO

umU9FgQJ2Dk

Delight

2nd May 2019, 07:44

I needed to hear this talk because this mandatory vaccine issue has been making me feel really mad.

ZfkO1M0u6QM

NF0fk9d8mHw

conk

2nd May 2019, 15:18

I do believe the science is settled. Vaccines are disgusting, vile, ineffective poison. Worse, the drug firms have ill-intent, which has been proven many times. They've been caught soundly perpetrating the most egregious harm against human beings. No, I can't cite anything now. It's been years since I studied the subject. So disgusting was the information there was no longer interest in continuing. The emotional impact arising from the idea of being forced to submit to a poisonous injection was too much, so I stopped studying. The residue of truth remains though. Vaccines are meant to harm us, period!

frankstien

2nd May 2019, 16:05

Yikes--------!!!!!!!!!!! Brainwashing at its peak?

Kids Boost Immunity honours Surrey school for vaccine donations
Elementary students donate more than 3,000 vaccinations to UNICEF

https://www.cloverdalereporter.com/news/kids-boost-immunity-honours-surrey-school-for-vaccine-donations/

https://2rcjb24cbz0o2q658b64vmrj-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/16529701_web1_copy_190423-SNW-M-SenatorReid-KidsBoostImmunity2-lc-apr23-1024x683.jpg

onawah

3rd May 2019, 00:44

A good place to learn more and take action- White House petition and more...
Natural Solutions Foundation
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/

[1] Sign Citizens Petition FDA-2019-P-1130-0001
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/
[2] Sign White House Petition (created on 4/19/19
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/suspend-all-existing-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals-violating-1986-childhood-vaccine-injury-act
"Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Proved It:
All Vaccines Violate US Law
FDA MUST Pull Them NOW!
http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/WhiteHousePetition-2019-screenshot-768x500.jpg

"How Can the FDA Recommend Illegal Drugs?
It’s Simple: By Breaking the Law!
.
Remember, it is a felony to recommend, sell or use unapproved drugs, including vaccines. FDA and its officials have knowingly done so since 1986 and, worse, induced others — including our children — to use these unavoidably unsafe, uninsurable and illegal toxic substances. Despite a clear and binding legal mandate from Congress to do so, the Federal Agencies, as revealed in court proceedings, have failed to produce or provide even one of the Annual Vaccine Safety Reports on each approved vaccine as mandated by Federal law.
.
Why do we have this law? Because although more than 400 people died from the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine (and not one person died from Swine Flu) Big Pharma induced Congress to protect it from any liability lawsuits. In return Congress required Big Pharma to make vaccines safer and he agencies to provide annual safety and effectiveness reports. NOT.ONE.SUCH.REPORT.HAS.EVER.BEEN.FILED.WITH.CONGRESS. That means not one vaccine deployed in the USA is a legal substance.
For decades Natural Solutions Foundation has been warning that all FDA “approved” vaccines violate US Law and are therefore illegal substances. Thanks to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s diligent public policy work, FDA was forced to admit in court that it has been flagrantly violating the law and allowing illegally “approved” vaccines to be jabbed into the unsuspecting bodies of nearly everyone in the United States.
.
The 1986 vaccine safety act, the National Childhood Vaccine Injuries Act (NCVIA) mandates annual reports from the FDA to the public and Congress on the safety and status of every vaccine used in the USA. NOT ONE REPORT HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED.
.
NCVIA also mandates that each future vaccine MUST be safer than previous vaccines SINCE THE DANGERS OF VACCINES WERE CLEARLY KNOWN AT THAT TIME! Because vaccines are “unvoidably unsafe” and uninsurable a special “court” was established to run the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program since the law abolished our right to sue vaccine drug companies no matter how badly damaged — or even killed.
.
NCVIA has been the law of the land for 33 years. FDA HAS KNOWINGLY FLAUNTED THE LAW ENDANGERING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EVERYONE ONE OF US. ENOUGH! THIS LEGAL ACTION REQUIRES ALL OF US TO ROAR OUR OUTRAGE AT THIS CRIMINAL DERELICTION OF DUTY.
.
We owe it to our damaged and betrayed children, brothers, sisters, parents and to ourselves!
.
Natural Solutions Foundation, together with allied NGOs (non-governmental organizations) such as Institute for Health Research. We are fortunate to be represented by Kent Heckenlively, a California lawyer. Counsel Kent understands the dangers well: he has two vaccine injured children.
.
This action is a formal Citizens’ Petition under the First Amendment to the Constitution in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The Petition notifies the FDA that we are aware of its illegal activities and we are seeking immediate and significant changes in the FDA’s approval of these illegal vaccines. Submitted at Regulations.gov on March 8, 2019, Tracking Number: 1k3-98nr-sky1
.
Here is the proof from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s United States District Court filing:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/RFKjr-vaxsmokinggun.jpg

VACCINATION SUSPENSION REGULATION
PROPOSED REGULATION TERMS
.
[The Regulation is to be drafted by Agency staff, to vindicate the Right to Informed Consent and the legal requirements of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]

.

ONE: Suspend the current approvals for all vaccine drugs, and/or prohibit all vaccines from birth to age eighteen, with “Not for Childhood Vaccination” placed on all vaccine labels by suspending the existing vaccine approvals as to minors, and in the alternative, prohibit all vaccination. The Suspension is to continue unless and until the requirements of the NCVIA have been met for each and every vaccine and version of the vaccine.

.

TWO: Immediate notification of all public health agencies, physicians, pharmacies, hospitals, schools, universities and similar to the effect that vaccination programs, schedules and policies are immediate placed on hold until further notice since no vaccine has met the legal requirements for approval and are therefore unapproved drugs pending scientific determination.

.

THREE: Suspend (pending repeal) the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and return vaccine injuries to the Constitutionally-mandated, traditional civil justice system.

.

FOUR: Set up and fund a Blue Ribbon Panel of experts not connected in any way to the pharmaceutical industry or government agencies, therefore free of any conflict of interest, to evaluate all aspects of vaccine approval, safety and science with a Report to be made public no later than two years the date of the Regulation to at least partially remediate the failure of the Agency or supervising Department to provide the Mandated Reports since 1989.

.

FIVE: Ban direct vaccine drug advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals, under 21 C.F.R. 202.

The full Petition is here:http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Vax-Suspend-APA-Petition.2019.pdf

phefFQ3P9mM
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/

Delight

3rd May 2019, 00:47

The bullying effect where it becomes OK to hate citizens who do not want to vaccinate leads to making them outcast. All for the sake of measles?

FpoJOlrnHns

TomKat

3rd May 2019, 01:11

In the 1970s in the US, there was a Supreme Court ruling called Roe v. Wade that stated that a woman has sovereignty over her own body. I don't see why this doesn't speak to everyone's inherent right to refuse vaccines, or any medical treatment, for that matter.

James Newell

3rd May 2019, 01:56

That is a Brilliant point to bring to mind over this forced vaccine crap. Obviously they, the powers that be, really want people to take these drugs. I find it Highly suspect they are passing such draconian laws. There must be a reason they want this stuff in your body and I doubt it is to stay healthy.

That there is Supreme court ruling about a persons own sovereignty over their body is a good reminder to NEVER go along with the crowd and give up your own sovereignty over your life and choices.

Delight

3rd May 2019, 15:53

Bumping this post and encourage others to make your concerns known.

A good place to learn more and take action- White House petition and more...
Natural Solutions Foundation
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/

[1] Sign Citizens Petition FDA-2019-P-1130-0001
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/
[2] Sign White House Petition (created on 4/19/19
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/suspend-all-existing-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals-violating-1986-childhood-vaccine-injury-act
"Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Proved It:
All Vaccines Violate US Law
FDA MUST Pull Them NOW!
http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/WhiteHousePetition-2019-screenshot-768x500.jpg

"How Can the FDA Recommend Illegal Drugs?
It’s Simple: By Breaking the Law!
.
Remember, it is a felony to recommend, sell or use unapproved drugs, including vaccines. FDA and its officials have knowingly done so since 1986 and, worse, induced others — including our children — to use these unavoidably unsafe, uninsurable and illegal toxic substances. Despite a clear and binding legal mandate from Congress to do so, the Federal Agencies, as revealed in court proceedings, have failed to produce or provide even one of the Annual Vaccine Safety Reports on each approved vaccine as mandated by Federal law.
.
Why do we have this law? Because although more than 400 people died from the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine (and not one person died from Swine Flu) Big Pharma induced Congress to protect it from any liability lawsuits. In return Congress required Big Pharma to make vaccines safer and he agencies to provide annual safety and effectiveness reports. NOT.ONE.SUCH.REPORT.HAS.EVER.BEEN.FILED.WITH.CONGRESS. That means not one vaccine deployed in the USA is a legal substance.
For decades Natural Solutions Foundation has been warning that all FDA “approved” vaccines violate US Law and are therefore illegal substances. Thanks to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s diligent public policy work, FDA was forced to admit in court that it has been flagrantly violating the law and allowing illegally “approved” vaccines to be jabbed into the unsuspecting bodies of nearly everyone in the United States.
.
The 1986 vaccine safety act, the National Childhood Vaccine Injuries Act (NCVIA) mandates annual reports from the FDA to the public and Congress on the safety and status of every vaccine used in the USA. NOT ONE REPORT HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED.
.
NCVIA also mandates that each future vaccine MUST be safer than previous vaccines SINCE THE DANGERS OF VACCINES WERE CLEARLY KNOWN AT THAT TIME! Because vaccines are “unvoidably unsafe” and uninsurable a special “court” was established to run the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program since the law abolished our right to sue vaccine drug companies no matter how badly damaged — or even killed.
.
NCVIA has been the law of the land for 33 years. FDA HAS KNOWINGLY FLAUNTED THE LAW ENDANGERING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EVERYONE ONE OF US. ENOUGH! THIS LEGAL ACTION REQUIRES ALL OF US TO ROAR OUR OUTRAGE AT THIS CRIMINAL DERELICTION OF DUTY.
.
We owe it to our damaged and betrayed children, brothers, sisters, parents and to ourselves!
.
Natural Solutions Foundation, together with allied NGOs (non-governmental organizations) such as Institute for Health Research. We are fortunate to be represented by Kent Heckenlively, a California lawyer. Counsel Kent understands the dangers well: he has two vaccine injured children.
.
This action is a formal Citizens’ Petition under the First Amendment to the Constitution in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The Petition notifies the FDA that we are aware of its illegal activities and we are seeking immediate and significant changes in the FDA’s approval of these illegal vaccines. Submitted at Regulations.gov on March 8, 2019, Tracking Number: 1k3-98nr-sky1
.
Here is the proof from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s United States District Court filing:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/RFKjr-vaxsmokinggun.jpg

VACCINATION SUSPENSION REGULATION
PROPOSED REGULATION TERMS
.
[The Regulation is to be drafted by Agency staff, to vindicate the Right to Informed Consent and the legal requirements of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]

.

ONE: Suspend the current approvals for all vaccine drugs, and/or prohibit all vaccines from birth to age eighteen, with “Not for Childhood Vaccination” placed on all vaccine labels by suspending the existing vaccine approvals as to minors, and in the alternative, prohibit all vaccination. The Suspension is to continue unless and until the requirements of the NCVIA have been met for each and every vaccine and version of the vaccine.

.

TWO: Immediate notification of all public health agencies, physicians, pharmacies, hospitals, schools, universities and similar to the effect that vaccination programs, schedules and policies are immediate placed on hold until further notice since no vaccine has met the legal requirements for approval and are therefore unapproved drugs pending scientific determination.

.

THREE: Suspend (pending repeal) the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and return vaccine injuries to the Constitutionally-mandated, traditional civil justice system.

.

FOUR: Set up and fund a Blue Ribbon Panel of experts not connected in any way to the pharmaceutical industry or government agencies, therefore free of any conflict of interest, to evaluate all aspects of vaccine approval, safety and science with a Report to be made public no later than two years the date of the Regulation to at least partially remediate the failure of the Agency or supervising Department to provide the Mandated Reports since 1989.

.

FIVE: Ban direct vaccine drug advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals, under 21 C.F.R. 202.

The full Petition is here:http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Vax-Suspend-APA-Petition.2019.pdf

phefFQ3P9mM
http://drrimatruthreports.com/petition-to-suspend-all-fda-vaccine-drug-approvals/[COLOR="red"]

Delight

3rd May 2019, 16:29

Vaccination bill dead in Colorado Senate, sparking accusations of putting politics before kids’ health (https://www.denverpost.com/2019/05/02/vaccine-vaccination-bill-colorado-senate/)

By ANNA STAVER | astaver@denverpost.com and NIC GARCIA | ngarcia@denverpost.com | The Denver Post
PUBLISHED: May 2, 2019 at 2:31 pm | UPDATED: May 2, 2019 at 11:20 pm

A bill that would have made it more difficult for parents to exempt their children from the vaccine requirements for public schools — legislation that consumed the General Assembly during the final days of the session — died Thursday.

Senate Democrats, who hold a narrow majority, cleared their crowded calendar Wednesday evening to hold a four-hour hearing on the bill only to delay debate on it Thursday, effectively killing its chances of becoming law.

“As a father and an ER nurse, I am extremely disappointed the Senate couldn’t get this important bill over the finish line,” said Rep. Kyle Mullica, D-Northglenn, the bill’s sponsor. “The health and safety of our children is of the utmost importance.”

House Bill 1312 would have required parents who want to exempt their children from vaccinations to fill out a form in person at a state health department office rather than simply giving the child’s school a note upon enrollment.

It had the overwhelming support of local and state health experts, who saw its passage as a small step toward protecting Colorado from a measles outbreak such as those taking place in Washington, California and New York.

“We are very disappointed in the last-minute actions of the Senate and their unwillingness to addressing an urgent public health concern in our state,” Stephanie Wasserman, executive director of the Colorado Children’s Immunization Coalition, said in a statement. “Legislators have put politics over the health and safety of our children.”

It wasn’t clear exactly why Democrats killed the bill Thursday. Senate Majority Leader Steve Fenberg, D-Boulder, said part of the problem was the lack of hours left to debate the bill.

“Republicans were not willing to let the vaccine bill come to a vote without hours and hours of debate, which would have prevented us from delivering on priority bills,” he said.

Democrats technically have the power to limit debate, but Fenberg didn’t feel it was “appropriate” for this particular bill.

Colorado politics from city hall to the halls of Congress, sent every Thursday.

Another factor in the vaccine bill’s demise was Gov. Jared Polis’ objections.

Polis had pushed back on the in-person requirement, saying he thought it might place an unfair burden on rural families. Earlier, he threatened to veto the first version of the vaccine bill, which would have eliminated one or both of Colorado’s nonmedical exemptions.

“I wish that he would have allowed the legislative process to do its work on this policy,” Sen. Julie Gonzales said. “But I look forward to working with him during the interim to bring forward a stronger bill.”

The governor’s office released a statement saying Polis appreciated the work lawmakers put into the bill, and that “improving the immunization rate is a top priority of our administration and through the Department of Public Health and Environment we will continue to identify best strategies.”

“Between elements in my caucus and the governor’s office, it wasn’t meant to be this year,” Priola said. “I’m going to bring it back next year. I believe it’s a good policy for the state of Colorado.”

Amazon is not distributing the book that came out on May 1st The Autism Vaccine: The Story of Modern Medicine's Greatest Tragedy Paperback
by Forrest Maready (https://www.amazon.com/PROOF-Vaccine-Medicines-Greatest-Tragedy/dp/B07PRPFDD1)

Forrest Maready on his new book The Autism Vaccine

KGzVMcak0To

Amazon Won’t Take a Stand in War Over Anti-Vaxxer Book
One online petition is calling for the book to be banned, while another is pushing for Amazon to carry it. (https://www.thedailybeast.com/amazon-wont-take-a-stand-in-war-over-forrest-maready-book-the-autism-vaccine)

An upcoming book by an anti-vaxxer has spawned two online petitions—one calling for Amazon to ban it and the other calling for the retailer to sell it.

But so far, Amazon—which has been criticized for giving anti-vaccine bunk higher billing on the site—won’t say if it plans to stock The Autism Vaccine: The Story of Modern Medicine’s Greatest Tragedy by Forrest Maready.

Maready, who has pushed the scientifically unsound theory that metal in vaccines causes football players’ chronic traumatic encephalopathy, is self-publishing his book on May 1 through his own company, Feels Like Fire.

Last month, a petition under the user name Real Truther went up on Change.org urging Amazon and Apple not to offer the book. Soon after, a counter-petition was posted on Change.org by an anti-vaxxer with the user named Scientific Mama, pushing for the book be sold on the two sites; it was later retweeted by noted anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Real Truther, a father of two in California, said that he was compelled to create the petition because of the book’s positioning of autism as “modern medicine’s greatest tragedy.”

“This ultimately disturbed me because he wasn’t just claiming vaccines cause autism but also that autism was ‘modern medicine’s greatest tragedy,’” Real Truther, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of being doxxed, told The Daily Beast via email. “I found this language and rhetoric extremely offensive.”

As of Friday afternoon, the petition in support of Maready’s book had a few thousand more signatures than the pro-vaccine one.

David Barre, a spokesman for Change.org, said complaints were lodged about both petitions but were deemed “fit to remain on the platform based on our published guidelines.”

Multiple measles outbreaks across the country have been blamed on vaccine skepticism and avoidance that persists despite an avalanche of studies showing vaccines save lives and serious side effects are rare.

Retailers, media outlets, and social media companies have been under fire for allowing anti-vaxxers to spread their debunked theories.

Facebook has been cracking down on ads that perpetuate vaccine misinformation. And Amazon, which has drawn fire for an algorithm that rewards books linking vaccines to autism, pulled at least two books off its site.

But it’s not clear if Maready’s book will get the same treatment. His website carries the logos of Amazon, Apple and Audible—but he put them there himself. And the companies simply won’t say what they plan to do.

Delight

4th May 2019, 00:52

Dr. Jim Meehan Nails the Message to the Wall: We Need to Change Vaccine Safety Science NOW (https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2019/03/07/dr-jim-meehan-nails-the-message-to-the-wall-we-need-to-change-vaccine-safety-science-now/)
March 8, 2019 at 12:21 am
An amazing interview. Dr. Meehan was clear and concise in his analysis of the corruption in the vaccine industry. This is someone who should have been at the table on Tuesday, not some 18 year old who thinks he knows something except for the fact that he’s being used.

Zach: “[The study] came out and it made it sound as if boy this is the nail in
the coffin [in the vaccine/autism question], what’s your take?”
Dr. Meehan: “It’s definitely not the nail in the coffin. This is kind of a rehash of some of the the same stuff that’s been coming out of Danish studies for quite a while. In fact there’s a lot of problems with the study. The first one goes back so you know to the point of who funded it…”

mUiBQqO28qg

The adjuvants like aluminum are not safe. Merck for instance has a monopoly on the MMR (Merck steps up measles vaccine production amid increased US demand
PUBLISHED WED, MAY 1 2019 • 4:39 PM EDT (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/01/merck-steps-up-measles-vaccine-production-amid-increased-us-demand.html) )and there is protection to them for any unintended consequences. There is NO incentive to even look for other adjuvants. IF there was no protection and the company had to bear the burden if sued for mal effects, there would at least be incentive to make sure the vaccines are safe.

This is not even about if vaccines are effective in the larger picture.

This book is $108.00 for the Kindle version

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41dGwf0q-3L._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

In light of the discovery of Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, or ASIA, Vaccines and Autoimmunity explores the role of adjuvants – specifically aluminum in different vaccines – and how they can induce diverse autoimmune clinical manifestations in genetically prone individuals.

Vaccines and Autoimmunity is divided into three sections; the first contextualizes the role of adjuvants in the framework of autoimmunity, covering the mechanism of action of adjuvants, experimental models of adjuvant induced autoimmune diseases, infections as adjuvants, the Gulf War Syndrome, sick-building syndrome (SBS), safe vaccines, toll-like receptors, TLRS in vaccines, pesticides as adjuvants, oil as adjuvant, mercury, aluminum and autoimmunity. The following section reviews literature on vaccines that have induced autoimmune conditions such as MMR and HBV, among others. The final section covers diseases in which vaccines were known to be the solicitor – for instance, systemic lupus erythematosus – and whether it can be induced by vaccines for MMR, HBV, HCV, and others.

Edited by leaders in the field, Vaccines and Autoimmunity is an invaluable resource for advanced students and researchers working in pathogenic and epidemiological studies.

But you can read the summary here:
Summary of Studies Featured in VACCINES & AUTOIMMUNITY
Edited by Yehuda Shoenfeld, Nancy Agmon-Levin and Lucija Tomljenovic (https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/519118/Content%20Offerings/Summary%20of%20Studies%20Featured%20in%20Vaccines%20and%20Autoimmunity%20.pdf)

unintended consequences

Kc9q3kMKgzE

Delight

4th May 2019, 01:54

The chilling of individual rights is moving along aided by continuing ignorance and hysterical fears of communicable diseases of which measles is a ludicrous example of danger.

California SB 277 eliminated religious and philosophical exemptions for vaccination making it mandatory except for medical exemptions. The former right to "just say no" to vaccination was easier than getting a medical exemption. When that bill went into effect, parents who have children with medical problems after vaccination did what they should... they went to an medical provider and obtained a medical exemption and therefore the number of medical exemptions increased.

Now SB276 is moving along despite huge protests from citizens and even cogent questioning by those in the assembly. But IMO it is transparent that this is a timely opportunity

One notices two things, the schism between the allopathic medical versus chiropractic communities in Richard Pan's allegations that exemptions were "sold" (mentioning chiropractors by title in the past as sources of too many exemptions).

Also, he trumpeted the increase in medical exemptions and the numbers of medical exemptions were not that huge, far from justifying this draconian move to eviscerate the authority of individual medical practitioners.

California is a bell weather state and IMO we should be aware that this is the beginning of a swelling wave.

Though it is over reaching, the FDA has already threatened federal mandates if states continue "lax laws"

SB 276: California doesn’t trust its own Medical Doctors (https://www.send2press.com/wire/sb-276-california-doesnt-trust-its-own-medical-doctors/)

CORTE MADERA, Calif., April 8, 2019 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — Dr. Don Harte, noted chiropractic activist, former Libertarian State Senate candidate, issues a dire warning against SB 276, which will eliminate the medical exemption for vaccination. “This is political-medical terrorism of parents and children.”

Dr. Don Harte
“California, already, has the dubious distinction of being the second state to eliminate the religious exemption for vaccination (after Mississippi), with the infamous SB 277, of 2015,” according to Dr. Harte. “Now, California seeks to throttle the judgement of individual medical doctors for individual patients. You thought that they would stop at dismissing the judgement of parents for their own children?”

Dr. Harte goes on… “The bill is proposed by State Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, vaccine extremist. Sen. Pan has already, successfully, interfered with parental rights and informed consent by his previously passed bills, AB2109 and SB 277. These bills have essentially destroyed any rights of parents to choose not to vaccinate, or fully vaccinate, their children. But he wants more. Some may think that this is a furtherance of public health. I am sure that Dr. Pan knows that SB 276 is an extension of state power, essentially Big Brother in a White Coat.”

“A Kaiser publication reported that, according to Director Karen Smith, the California Department of Public Health is conducting a ‘review of schools’ where the number of vaccine exemptions appears ‘biologically unlikely,’” Dr. Harte notes. “How Orwellian!” That publication reports that “questionable exemptions will be reported to the Medical Board.”

Dr. Harte says: “The very willing, pharmaceutical advertising-laden news media are happy to report instances of alleged abuse of the medical exemption, creating their own fake news. Medical doctors who are willing to write these exemptions are portrayed as foolish, at best, and criminal, at worst.”

He goes on: “There have already been certain doctors who have been attacked and persecuted by the press and the medical board. An example is a headline of the ‘Medical Press’: ‘In California, some doctors sell ‘medical exemptions’ for kids’ vaccinations,’ as if the vaccine-shooting docs work for free.” He continues, “I have seen this very type of “money-hungry’ libel many times, against chiropractors. Considering that Medicine sucks up one-fifth of the American economy, and the very tiny minority of pediatricians who stand up to do the right thing, to make this argument, well, it’s a lot of nerve and not so much brain.”

According to CBS Channel 13 in Sacramento, Dr. Pan have the nerve to say “There’s a very small number of physicians who have betrayed their professional oath. I think they’re monetizing their license.” Dr. Harte says that it is just the opposite: “It is the pediatricians who push vaccines who are betraying their professional oath, whether those vaccines are ‘accepted’ by the Establishment, or not. There is no question that each vaccine contains a variety of neuro- and immunotoxins, and that vaccination, as a process, subverts normal immune processes.” Dr. Harte declares, “I question the ethics and the competency of the pediatricians who, regularly, perform serial vaccination, causing untold harm. Have they forgotten that part of the Hippocratic Oath, ‘First, do no harm?’”

Dr. Harte explains, “A non-fake news/real science headline would be ‘In California, pediatricians make huge profits selling vaccines and the office visits required, plus even bigger profits off of all the serious illnesses that result from vaccinations. Now they seek to attack their colleagues who choose to do the right thing.’”

“Yes, there should be medical exemptions for vaccination,” Dr. Harte declares. “If pediatricians are going to go with science, and truly be for the children whom they are supposed to serve, 100 percent of children should be exempted. Vaccines are a clear and present danger to the health of children. The State of California and any other jurisdiction or agency who mandates compulsory vaccination is a clear and present danger to liberty.”

About Dr. Don Harte:
Dr. Don Harte, former medical student, is a principled, traditional chiropractor serving Marin and the Greater Bay Area since 1981. He is an activist in the struggle for free speech for chiropractors. Dr. Harte was named 2006 “Chiropractor of the Year” by the World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA). He has served on the Boards of the WCA and the Council on Chiropractic Practice. His articles have been published in OMNI magazine, San Francisco Chronicle, Marin Independent Journal, North Bay Biz, Chiropractic Journal and Journal of the California Chiropractic Association. Learn more at: https://www.chirodrharte.com/.

Editorial in Mountain Democrat
PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA

Senate Bill 276 not needed (https://www.mtdemocrat.com/letters/senate-bill-276-not-needed/)
Senate Bill 276 is unnecessary and represents dangerous government intervention into healthcare decisions.

The proposed bill would require a state public health officer or their designee to approve or deny any vaccine medical exemption request submitted by a physician or surgeon. It also requires the creation of database to track individual medical exemptions requests and decisions.

Sen. Richard Pan, chair of the Assembly Health Committee, has used data from the Kindergarten Immunization Assessment Report to justify the need for this bill, stating, “Medical exemptions have more than tripled since the passage of SB 277.” Sen. Pan also states, “A very small percentage of the population, less than 1 percent, suffers from qualifying medical condition such as a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component that would lead to the granting of medical exemption.”

According to the Kindergarten Immunization Assessment Report, which is being referenced by Sen. Pan, “Compared to 2016-17 in 2017-18, the proportion of kindergarteners reported as having permanent medical exemptions increased from 0.5 percent to 0.7 percent.” Both numbers represent less than 1 percent of the population; yes, that same 1 percent that Sen. Pan said could suffer from a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component.

The Kindergarten Immunization Assessment requires all public and private schools to report the immunization status of kindergarten students; however, schools with multi-year kindergarten programs or transitional kindergarten are required to list student younger than kindergarten age on their assessment. The result is that some students are reported for multiple years, including students with medical exemptions.

Kris Calvin of the American Academy of Pediatrics, California, says SB 276 is a “reasonable and urgently needed measure.” Yet, the proportion of students reported to have received all required vaccines is 95.1 percent, the second highest since the 2001-02 school year.

The data simply does not support an urgent need for SB 276, and it is far from reasonable that a government official should make decisions for the most vulnerable children in our communities.

FDA chief: Federal government might step in if states don’t change lax vaccine laws
FEBRUARY 20, 2019, (https://fox43.com/2019/02/20/fda-chief-federal-government-might-step-in-if-states-dont-change-lax-vaccine-laws/)
The head of the US Food and Drug Administration says that if states don’t require more schoolchildren to get vaccinated, the federal government might have to step in.

Nearly all states allow children to attend school even if their parents opt out of vaccines. These vaccine exemptions are especially popular in Washington state, where a measles outbreak started last month that has now sickened at least 67 people in four states. And New York has been working to contain its largest outbreak in decades, which began in October and has sickened more than 200 people.

“Some states are engaging in such wide exemptions that they’re creating the opportunity for outbreaks on a scale that is going to have national implications,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said Tuesday in an interview with CNN.

If “certain states continue down the path that they’re on, I think they’re going to force the hand of the federal health agencies,” he added.

Gottlieb’s suggestion about the federal government and vaccines was first reported by Axios.

The commissioner was vague on when he thought the federal government should take action and what exactly that action should be. “You could mandate certain rules about what is and isn’t permissible when it comes to allowing people to have exemptions,” he said.

He said he hoped that the measles outbreak would make state officials realize that they needed to get stricter on exemptions.

Forty-seven states allow parents to opt out of childhood vaccines for religious reasons. Of those, 17, including Washington, allow parents to opt out because they feel that vaccines violate their personal or philosophical beliefs.

The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical groups have long said that states should get rid of all exemptions except when a vaccine would cause medical harm to a child.

Gottlieb said he is “deeply skeptical” of all exemptions except medical ones.

Reaction to Gottlieb’s statements was mixed.

“This is fantastic news,” said Dr. Adam Ratner, director of the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases at Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital at NYU Langone. “I think some of the states may need that kind of push.”

Bill Zedler, a Republican Texas state representative, disagrees.

“It’s a horrible idea,” said Zedler, who has fought efforts to get rid of religious and personal exemptions in his state.

“That’s why we have different laws in every state: so the citizens of that state can decide how they want to run things,” he added.

Dr. Richard Pan, a pediatrician and state senator in California, said that although he welcomed national leadership on this issue, he was concerned about the legality of the federal government moving into an area that has been controlled by state laws.

“Traditionally, school entry requirements have been the role of the states, so there might be a constitutional challenge if the federal government tried to mandate by law those school requirements,” he said.

Pan, who four years ago successfully led an effort to get rid of personal and religious vaccine exemptions in his state, said he thought national leaders might take a different approach than what Gottlieb suggests to increase vaccination rates.

On Tuesday, he sent a letter to US Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams to ramp up efforts to address parents who are hesitant to vaccinate their children.

“As our nation’s doctor, I urge you to issue a call to action on vaccine hesitancy in the United States and make this crisis a public health priority,” Pan wrote.

Pan warned Adams about campaigns on social media to scare parents away from vaccinations.

“Our nation requires your leadership to stop this attack on our nation’s health by addressing the spread of vaccine misinformation causing unwarranted vaccine hesitancy,” he wrote.

In a statement to CNN, Adams said he has “consistently championed for the use of vaccinations.”

He added that “the data tells us that that states with broader exemption laws have higher numbers of unvaccinated residents, which predisposes them to outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases like measles.”

THtM6z1Tx_Q

Physicians for Informed Consent
Published on May 2, 2019
Sacramento, California State Capitol: Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) members Dr. Edmond Sarraf (pediatrics), Dr. Shira Miller (internal medicine), Dr. Melanie Gisler (family medicine), Dr. Lionel Lee (emergency medicine), and Dr. Charles Penick (family medicine) speak out to help children at-risk of vaccine injuries keep their medical exemptions. PIC educational materials were delivered to all 120 legislators, prior to the Senate Committee on Health hearing on April 24, 2019.

Physician Groups Opposing SB276 are:
Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC)
Physicians' Association for Anthroposophic Medicine (PAAM)
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
See their position papers to California Legislators here:
https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Doctor-Groups-Oppose-SB276.pdf

Want to help? Here are some options:
1. Share the above position papers with your doctor.
2. Ask your doctor to speak with his or her legislators about SB276.
3. Make an appointment to speak with your legislators about SB276.
4. Join or Donate at www.physiciansforinformedconsent.org
5. Post a comment to LegiScan: https://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB276/2019

Delight

4th May 2019, 02:08

More information to absorb and pass on.

Three Profoundly-important, Science-based Articles from an Indian Asian Vaccine Scholar with Observations on the US sanctioned “Vaccine Holocaust of Newborns, Infants and Children”

Gary Kohls
Thursday May. 2nd, 2019
(http://duluthreader.com/articles/2019/05/02/16832_three_profoundly_important_science_based_articles)

It needs to be said that the parents of over-vaccinated newborns, infants and children have been thoroughly-indoctrinated to be obedient to any number of authority figures and therefore frequently allow – without hesitation and without doing their own research – the administration of invasive procedures such as multiple vaccines being injected simultaneously into the tiny muscles of their children (combinations of which have never been proven to be safe).

Overwhelmingly, that parental consent is not “informed consent” as required by law. Uninformed consent is therefore often given without the parents being properly informed of the potential hazards, short or long-term. Therefore their children are at high risk of becoming sickened – sooner or later - with vaccine toxin-induced illnesses.

It is important that all parents or guardians of infants and children read the following information carefully and studiously before consenting to future vaccination.
Aluminum and Mercury in Vaccines Linked to Neurological Disorders and Autism

By Arya Vrilya - July 11, 2018

Peer-Reviewed Studies Found a Causal Link Between Aluminium in Childhood Vaccines and Severe Neurological Disorders Including Autism
Link: http://thinktwice.com/studies_aluminum.htm
Also Read the Following Brief Papers on the Neurotoxicity of Aluminium in Vaccines:
Link: http://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf
Link: http://thinktwice.com/aluminum.pdf

Highest Level of Aluminium Found in Brains of Autistic Children (Study)

The following recently published landmark and highly alarming peer-reviewed study has found the highest levels of aluminium in the brain of 5 autistic children:
Link: http://info.cmsri.org/aluminum-and-your-health-blog/study-finds-some-of-the-highest-values-for-aluminium-in-human-brain-tissue-yet-recorded-in-brains-of-autistic-patients

Exponential Increase in Autism Rates in US Children Linked to CDC Vaccine Schedule
Exponential Increase in Autism Rates in US Children Linked to CDC Vaccine Schedule. Image supplied by Gary Kohls
CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule Linked to Neurological Disorders and Autism

The 2017 US CDC (Centre for Disease CREATION and PROMOTION) vaccine schedule requires U.S. children from birth to age 6 to receive 50 doses of 14 vaccines, many of which contain both neurotoxic aluminium and mercury (thimerosal)!
Infants in the US are exposed from birth to age 2, to 24 vaccine doses, combining 8-in-1 vaccines to be given to infants 2, 4, and 6 months in a single visit! Babies receive 36 vaccine doses before they are 18 months old!

This is Criminal Insanity & State-Sanctioned Medical Murder of Newborns, Infants And Children!

Link to CDC vaccine ingredients: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm
Link to CDC vaccine schedule: https://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/49-Doses-PosterB.pdf
Exponential Increase in Autism Rates
in US Children Linked to CDC Vaccine
Schedule
In 1985, the autism prevalence rate in the US was 1 in 2,500; in 1995 it was 1 in 500; In 2014 it was 1 in 45! In children aged 3 to 17, the autism prevalence rate increased by 80% from 2011-2013! At this rate, it is predicted that 1 out of 2 children in the US will have autism by 2030!
A report by EPA scientists Timing of Increased Autism Disorder Cumulative Incidence analyzed the cumulative incidence of autistic disorder during a 10-year period (1987–1996) pinpointed a sharp “changepoint” year (1988) when the incidence of autism sharply increased. The “changepoint” year is concomitant with the year childhood vaccination schedules expanded.

Source: http://ahrp.org/disconnect-between-evidence-cdc-claims-re-childhood-vaccination-schedule/

Causal Link Between Mercury
(Thimerosal) Contained in Vaccines,
Neurological Disorders and Autism

Scientific research and CDC internal documents on the toxicity of mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines reveal exposure to thimerosal during the first month of life increased the relative risk of autism by 7.6 (760%), 1.8 (180%) increased relative risk for a neurodevelopmental disorder; 2.1 (210%) relative risk for speech disorder; and 5-fold (500%) increased relative risk for a nonorganic sleep disorder.

The CDC also suppressed the original findings of another of its own studies that found a 340% (3.6) relative increased risk of autism for African American male babies following MMR vaccination in accordance with the CDC-recommended Childhood Vaccination Schedule.
The alarming and damning scientific evidence, documents that infants exposed to vaccines laced with thimerosal during the first month of life are at alarmingly high increased the relative risk of serious harm. “The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death,” writes Dr. Richard Johnston, M.D., an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado.

Dr. Verstraeten also said: “what I will present to you is the study that nobody thought we should do.” The study categorized the cumulative effect of thimerosal-containing vaccines administered to infants after one month of life and assessed the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders, and renal disorders before the age of six. Dr. Verstraeten stated that ALL of these relative risks were statistically significant.

Source: http://ahrp.org/betrayal-of-public-trust-institutional-corruption-vaccine-safety-ratings-vaccine-science-falsified/
Additional published peer-reviewed studies that found a causal link between childhood vaccines containing mercury (Thimerosal) and neurological disorders including autism.

Synergistic Toxicity of Aluminium
& Thimerosal in Vaccines

Dr. Boyd Haley, former professor of medicinal chemistry and chairman of the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky, published a study in which he investigated the effect of combining aluminum hydroxide with thimerosal. In this study, cultured neurons showed no significant cell death six hours after they were exposed to just aluminum; more than 90% survived. Thimerosal alone also caused few neurons to die after six hours of exposure. Again, more than 90% survived. However, when cultured neurons were exposed to aluminum and thimerosal, only about 40% survived after six hours, clearly demonstrating synergistic toxicity (Figure 3). Source: http://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf

As Neil Miller writes:
”Millions of children every year are injected with vaccines containing mercury and aluminum despite well-established experimental evidence of the potential for additive or synergistic toxicity when an organism is exposed to two or more toxic metals.
Dr. Haley’s study in which cultured neurons died at an accelerated rate following concurrent exposure to aluminum and thimerosal provides evidence of an enhanced detrimental effect. In addition, aluminum toxicity levels published by FDA indicate that two-month-old babies who are vaccinated according to CDC guidelines may be receiving quantities of aluminum that are significantly higher than safety levels.”

Statements from Prominent & Eminent Medical Doctors & Scientists on the Toxicity of Aluminium in Childhood Vaccines:
Conclusion:
Both neurotoxic aluminium and mercury (thimerosal) contained in multiple doses of childhood vaccines as well as the CDC vaccine schedule cause severe and permanent neurological disorders including autism in newborns, infants and children!
When will the US sanctioned Vaccine Holocaust of newborns, infants and children end?

Vaccines Cause Brain Injuries,
Neurological Disorders and Autism

Vaccines Trigger a “Cytokine Storm”
of the Immune System, Leading to
Severe and Permanent Neurological
Disorders, Brain Injuries and Autism.

By Arya Vrilya - Sunday, July 22, 2018

https://yajnacentre.blogspot.
com/2018/07/vaccines-cause-brain-
injuries-including.html

As vaccinepapers.org writes:

The term “immune activation” describes the activation of the cellular components of the immune system. The developing brain can be injured by immune activation, with life-long consequences (Meyer 2009, Deverman 2009, Estes 2016, neusel 2014, Careaga 2017, Meyer 2014).
Immune activation injury is linked to autism, schizophrenia, depression and other mental illnesses or neurodevelopmental disorders. Immune activation effects on the brain are mediated by immune system signaling molecules, especially cytokines (Estes 2016, Meyer 2014, Smith 2007, Choi 2016, Pineda 2013).

Human brain development is controlled by immune-system signals (i.e. “cytokines”). Activation of the immune system during brain development causes disruptions in these signals, resulting in permanent brain injury. The injury manifests as autism, schizophrenia and other mental illnesses. Adverse vaccine reactions are proven to stimulate a cytokine (interleukin-6) proven to cause autism.

In the maternal immune activation experiments, inflammatory signaling and some cytokines (e.g. IL-6) traverse the placenta into the fetus. Consequently, immune activation in the mother causes immune activation and elevated cytokines in the fetus, and in the fetal brain (Oskvig 2012, Ghiani 2011).
Diverse evidence indicates that the brain can be adversely affected by postnatal immune activation. Postnatal immune activation experiments, human case reports, and consideration of brain development timelines suggest that the human brain is vulnerable to immune activation injury for years after birth.

Postnatal immune activation can have adverse neurological effects, including increased seizure susceptibility (Chen 2013,Galic 2008), learning and memory deficits (Harre 2008), and an increase in excitatory synapse formation (Shen 2016). Seizure disorders, learning and memory dysfunction, and elevated excitatory signaling are associated with autism.

The timing of brain development processes in humans supports the idea that the human brain is vulnerable to immune activation and cytokines in the first few years after birth, when vaccines are administered. Disruption of synaptogenesis by vaccine induced immune activation is a particular concern. The accumulating evidence indicates that vaccine-induced immune activation, and aluminum adjuvants in particular, may cause mental illnesses and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism.

Link to the paper: vaccinepapers.org/review-paper-al-adjuvant-autism-20-pages-97-references/

Newly Quadraplegic 4-year-old, Geneviève Blais at the Montreal Children’s Hospital diagnosed with AFM
Newly Quadraplegic 4-year-old, Geneviève Blais at the Montreal Children’s Hospital diagnosed with AFM. Image supplied by Gary Kohls. Image supplied by Gary Kohls
Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM):
A “Mysterious” Paralyzing Illness
Caused by Enteroviruses or by
Neurotoxic Vaccines ?

By Arya Vrilya - Tuesday, October 23, 2018

https://yajnacentre.blogspot.com/2018/10/mysterious-paralyzing-illness-caused-by.html
A new “unknown” and “mysterious” paralyzing neurological illness named Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM) has been paralyzing young children across the US and Canada since 2014. According to the US CDC, there have been 368 registered cases of AFM since 2014; 149 cases were registered in 2016 alone (the highest number of cases in any single year) and 68 cases have been reported so far in 2018.

“AFM is a rare, but serious condition that affects the nervous system. It specifically affects the area of spinal cord called gray matter and causes muscles and reflexes to become weak. In most cases, the patient’s arms or legs become weak, similar to the results of infection with polio. In some cases, patients recover quickly. In other cases, patients remain paralyzed. There is a lot we don’t know about AFM, and I am frustrated that despite all of our efforts, we haven’t been able to identify the cause of this mystery illness,” said Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.

According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, there were fewer than five cases reported in Canada between January and August 2018. However, over the last few weeks, more than 20 additional cases were alarmingly reported in Canada including 6 in Montréal, Québec.
In Septembre 2018, a four-year old Canadian girl from Québec (Geneviève Blais, pictured above) was diagnosed with AFM in Québec. Her treating physician Dr. Christos Karatzios, a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialist at Montréal Children’s Hospital briefly explained the “mysterious” illness of his patient in the following television interviews:
Listen to the doctor’s TV interview in
English
In response to a question on his FB page about this “mysterious” paralyzing neurological illness, Dr. Karatzios wrote:
“We are actually uncertain what exactly is causing it, but we suspect it to be an enterovirus - similar to polio virus (that is also an enterovirus but has been pretty much eradicated because of vaccination) We suspect enterovirus D68 or 71. We have not been able to easily isolate it from the spinal fluid and so we can only make an association when we isolate it in saliva or stool. Very similar clinical symptoms to polio but can be caught like a cold.”

In other words, there is no conclusive scientific evidence to confirm a causal relationship between the “suspected” enterovirus D68 or 71 and the “mysterious” crippling neurological illness (AFM) that is causing myelitis paralysis in young children.

Enteroviruses or Neurotoxic Vaccines
Causing Myelitis Paralysis ?

I, in turn, asked Dr. Karatzios whether this new “mysterious” paralyzing neurological illness could be caused by a long list of mandatory or recommended vaccines administered to newborns, infants and children that contain neurotoxic mercury (thimerosal) and/or aluminium which are extremely neurotoxic for the central nervous system and the developing brain of newborns, infants and children ?

In fact, several published scientific studies have found a causal relationship between vaccines that contain mercury and/or aluminium and neurological disorders in children and more specifically between vaccines and transverse myelitis. Moreover, the vaccines inserts CLEARLY list transverse myelitis as an adverse “side effect” of vaccines, as the following insightful paper and articles reveal:

Chart of US AFM cases since 2014 showing the strong correlation between preschool vaccinations and the onset of AFM paralysis
Chart of US AFM cases since 2014 showing the strong correlation between preschool vaccinations and the onset of AFM paralysis.
Transverse Myelitis and Vaccines:
A Multi-Analysis

https://www.learntherisk.org/news/paralysis-vaccines/?fbclid=IwAR2xLo7QS9GzotrQQEbh82GO5OHh8TR1wR7iEtK8BuoOgPHoHeqW5Yexpac

https://www.learntherisk.org/news/myelitis/
Polio Vaccines and Acute Flaccid
Myelitis (AFM)

Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM) is also an adverse “side effect” of the polio vaccine. In fact, over 47,500 children in India were paralyzed after being injected with the polio vaccine a few years ago. AFM, also known as Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) or non-polio AFP (NPAFP), has been reported since 2014 as a “mysterious polio-like illness”.

In a paper published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics in 2012, Neetu Vashisht, MD and Jacob Puliya, MD wrote: “Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio vaccine received.”
Moreover, In 1992 the CDC publicly admitted that every case of poliomyelitis paralysis in the US since the early 1960’s was CAUSED by the oral polio vaccine (OPV) used in the US from the early 1960’s to 2000!
And as far back as 1976, Dr Salk publicly admitted under testimony that the OPV used in the US from the early 1960’s to 2000 was “the principal if not the sole cause” of all poliomyelitis paralysis cases in the US since 1961.
Dr Karatzios, however, categorically denies that vaccines could be causing transverse myelitis in children by arguing that patients that he diagnosed with AFM had not been vaccinated 2 months prior to contracting the “mysterious” paralyzing illness.
In response, I argued that most neurological vaccine injuries often manifest several months or years after the administration of the vaccine; moreover, several published studies cited in the linked articles above have found a causal link between vaccine and transverse myelitis, including AFM.
And last but not least, the vaccines package inserts CLEARLY list transverse myelitis as an adverse “side effect” of several vaccines administered to children and adults alike.

Note: Dr. Karatzios has deleted both his FB post and our correspondence exchanged on his FB page.

(Arya Vrilya is the executive director of the Yajna Centre in India, whose mission and objective is to build a non-violent economic architecture based on the foundation of Non-Violence laid by Mahatma Gandhi. He researches and writes incisively about international issues, especially concerning human and environmental health matters that are usually caused by exploitive multinational profit-making corporations and the unjust power that they wield.)

Dr Kohls is a retired family physician from Duluth, MN, USA. Since his retirement from his holistic mental health practice he has been writing his weekly Duty to Warn column for the Duluth Reader, northeast Minnesota’s alternative newsweekly magazine.

Delight

4th May 2019, 02:53

I have posted more than enough to look at and maybe it may help some to decide that activism in this area is important? IMO facts show that unlike other issues where we can at least act to avoid the substances we are concerned about, MANDATORY takes what may be harmful to a totally new and insufferable level.

It is a mandated law that can keep us out of public places, prevent us from having a driver's license, keep us from work, school and on and on [for those eligible I see eventual loss of medicare (maybe insurance all together?), social security, all welfare checks, loss of literal liberty with maybe jail time].

People seem happy to see "Antivaxxers" as a dangerous criminal conspiracy.

Fund raising for Vaxxed II is slated to be banned form indiegogo

Indiegogo Will Ban Anti-Vaccine Fundraisers As Measles Cases Surge To A Record Level
A new policy will bar fundraisers that make health claims without scientific backing, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Claudia Koerner
BuzzFeed News Reporter
April 26, 2019 (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/claudiakoerner/indiegogo-will-ban-anti-vaccine-fundraisers-as-measles)

Crowdfunding site Indiegogo will no longer allow anti-vaccine fundraisers or any projects making health claims that do not have a scientific backing, the company said Friday.

The move comes after anti-vaccine advocates raised $86,543 for a documentary based on the false claim that vaccines cause autism. The prospective makers of Vaxxed II: The People's Truth will still get their cash, minus the site's 5% fee, but Indiegogo is working on a new policy that would keep similar anti-vaccine projects off the platform in the future, a company spokesperson told BuzzFeed News Friday.

The policy has not yet been finalized, and the spokesperson did not say when it was expected to take effect.

The move comes as the US records its worst year for measles since the disease was declared eradicated in 2000. Vaccination rates across the country as a whole have remained high, the CDC has said, but in some communities, parents have refused to vaccinate their children largely because of misinformation claiming vaccines are dangerous. Exposure to the measles virus — often from a person who has traveled overseas — can quickly turn into an outbreak when members of the public are unvaccinated.

Public health officials are struggling to control the outbreaks, which experts believe will become a new normal. Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases, and it can cause severe complications or even death.

And though vaccines have repeatedly been found to be safe and effective, parents' fears about risks continue to be stoked by anti-vaccine advocates and bogus science via books, videos, and social media. GoFundMe last month announced it was banning fundraisers for anti-vaccine misinformation campaigns, and Facebook and YouTube have taken steps against promoting anti-vaccine content to users.

The documentary Vaxxed, directed by discredited British doctor Andrew Wakefield, was removed from Amazon Prime Video as well as library media streaming service Hoopla.

Two producers of the 2016 film have been working to create its follow-up, featuring testimonials from parents who said their children were irreparably harmed by vaccines.

"See the TRUTH that the Government, Doctors, and Big Pharma never wanted you to know," the Indiegogo fundraising page said.

While the fundraiser did not violate existing policies on untruthful campaigns, which focus on campaigns that mislead and defraud donors, Indiegogo never promoted it on its site, the company spokesperson said.

In the Vaxxed II fundraiser, executive directors Polly Tommey and Brian Burrowes are clear about the pushback the original documentary received and its ban from platforms and screenings, including the Tribeca Film Festival, which they derided as censorship by powerful interests.

"You can’t silence the truth, the parents like myself who vaccinated and now have brain damaged adults to look after for life because we DID vaccinate will never be silenced," Tommey told BuzzFeed News in an email. "Vaxxed 2 is even more powerful than the first film, The People’s Truth. Censorship has a horrid way of backfiring on those implementing."

I am really quite flabbergasted that people, who IMO should be aware of this sliding towards (what feels to me like) total loss of autonomy, are sounding already zombified..."safe and effective", "Measles OMG".

This is while passively tolerating obvious declines in health. There is some sort of social virus that is willing to accept radical "neurodiversity" as a new normal, chronic illness and plain old loss of say so.

Of course the ones who suffer should not be stigmatized. Unfortunately I have little trust that euthanasia ISN'T a few steps ahead for the ones who will need constant care.

Now there are people who with vehemence wildly attack anyone who might after deeply thinking and reason refuse. There are also so many ignorant about the fact that vaccinated people are not actually immune to the diseases. Here is one nurse's family (all vaccinated) experience with mumps....

zrgD9X2pEd4

Sign petitions, learn information and try to speak to the legislators is all I can think politically to do at this point. If I do these things, I may still face mandatory vaccination? What then? Pick up a gun? I don't think so (personally).

I am not sure what to do next. Maybe I will post more here but I feel as though I have flooded this thread and it may take a few weeks for any one with a life to sift.

I am noticing that we are DEFINITELY being poised to police ourselves. We are being positioned to silence all dissenting views whenever we can be convinced that the right of an individual in any way conflicts with the official policy of what the "good of the whole" requires. It matters not a bit if this is not backed by scientific validity or even common sense.

People have mentioned Roe V Wade and rights over the body. I don't know enough and interestingly, there is very little to find online (Hummm). But maybe there is something there.

In the mean time, I am looking into Zack Bush and detoxifying for my friends' children (those who think there may be something valuable... some look at me like I am devilish.)

In Ontario Canada main stream media says medical professionals are devilish if they have a different professional opinion....

Three senior members of the council that regulates Ontario chiropractors have made anti-vaccination statements
Presented with the information, Ontario's Ministry of Health said it will take no action because chiropractic is a self-regulated health profession (https://nationalpost.com/news/college-of-chiropractors-of-ontario-anti-vaccine)Three senior members of the council that regulates Ontario chiropractors have made anti-vaccination statements
Presented with the information, Ontario's Ministry of Health said it will take no action because chiropractic is a self-regulated health profession

Three senior members of the professional organization that regulates Ontario’s chiropractors have espoused or endorsed anti-vaccine views, the National Post has learned.

Drs. Elizabeth Anderson-Peacock, Peter Amlinger and Clifford Hardick, all members of the council of the College of Chiropractors of Ontario (CCO), have each written online posts, endorsed anti-vaccine books and documentaries or have made statements that encourage the notion that vaccination is dangerous.

Anderson-Peacock is the the current vice-president of the CCO. Both Amlinger and Hardick are past presidents. Their anti-vaccination endorsements, writings and appearances stand in contrast to the CCO’s own position on vaccination, which states that “immunizations and vaccinations are outside the scope of chiropractic practice” and any discussions about them with patients must be “accurate, professional and balanced.”

Ontario’s mandatory class for parents seeking vaccine exemptions has ‘zero conversions’
Chiropractors are one of the largest primary-contact health care professions in the country. About 4.5 million Canadians visit the country’s 9,000 licensed chiropractors each year. A 2018 Health Canada survey found that 84 per cent of parents cited health care professionals as their primary source of information on vaccinations.

In response to questions from the Post, Anderson-Peacock denied she endorsed “any ‘anti-vaccination’ position.” Amlinger declined to say whether he believes vaccines are safe and effective, saying only that he believes vaccination is “a public health issue.” Both Amlinger and Anderson-Peacock said their personal opinions were separate from their duties with the CCO. Hardick did not respond to a request for comment.

NDP health critic France Gelinas, shown at a press conference in Sudbury, Ont. on November 27, 2018, is calling on the Ontario government to investigate the College of Chiropractors of Ontario. John Lappa /Postmedia Network
The revelation comes amid an outbreak of measles in Ontario and B.C. and a renewed vaccination campaign by Ontario’s Ministry of Health. Presented with the information, the ministry told the Post it will take no action as chiropractic is a self-regulated health profession. Ontario NDP health critic France Gélinas, meanwhile, responded to the information with a call for the ministry to launch an immediate investigation of the entire CCO. “The minister has to step in right now,” she told the Post. “The college as a whole has to be held accountable. The college failed in its basic function to protect the public.”

The CCO has never taken an official position against vaccination. When the Post contacted the CCO for comment, it received a response that did not address the specific problems addressed in the story. However, less than 24 hours later the CCO issued an advisory in which it stated: “As part of its role to protect the public interest, the College of Chiropractors of Ontario (CCO) recognizes that vaccinations, as mandated in the Province of Ontario, provide a safe and effective means to protect individuals from infectious diseases.”

It also said the council “will be reviewing Standard of Practice S-001: Chiropractic Scope of Practice and some amendments are anticipated in making the standard more explicit that members not conduct seminars on vaccination or publish information on vaccination on their websites or social media accounts.”

“I would be concerned about any health care professional who is providing their patients with vaccine information that does not align with the peer-reviewed scientific evidence and the recommendations of Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization,” said Dr. Julie Bettinger, a professor in the Vaccine Evaluation Centre at the University of British Columbia.

I do not endorse any 'anti-vaccination' position. Rather, I personally believe individuals should obtain informed-consent whenever receiving treatment of any kind from the appropriate provider.

Anderson-Peacock has endorsed an anti-vaccine book, Immunization: History, Ethics, Law and Health by Catherine Diodati. In the book, Diodati writes, “All vaccines are capable of causing disease and death … some vaccines appear to render people more susceptible to disease.” The appendix references an array of anti-vaccination groups and organizations.

In a review on Amazon, Anderson-Peacock wrote: “A must read for those who wish to be aware, responsible and informed … especially parents and physicians prior to injection.”

She also offered online praise for the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe. The film is directed by Andrew Wakefield and is produced by prominent anti-vaccination activist, Del Bigtree. Wakefield is a disgraced former British doctor who was the lead author of a fraudulent research paper that linked the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine to autism. The documentary claims the Centers for Disease Control in the U.S. covered up a purported link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

On Facebook, Anderson-Peacock wrote: “It’s an awesome movie. Saw it yesterday in Atlanta with a q and a afterwards with the producer and one mom featured, Polly. They asked the audience please stand if you have anyone in your family, not friends but family who has autism and half the audience stood. The newest projected stat is that if the rates continue as is will be 1 in 2 body will have a DC of autism by 2023.”

She was also a guest on the Healthy Alternatives to Vaccination podcast around late 2016 — though her appearance on the podcast is no longer online — and has appeared as a guest speaker at conferences organized by the International Chiropractic Pediatric Association (ICPA). On its website the ICPA claims that current evidence suggests mercury in vaccines causes autism, and past ICPA conferences have featured Wakefield, Bigtree and Barbara Loe Fisher, an anti-vaccine advocate and the co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, which has sponsored ICPA events.

In a statement emailed to the Post, Anderson-Peacock said, “I stand with the policies of our regulatory college in the interest of public health. I stand with public health initiatives. Period.”

In a further statement provided via her lawyer, she added: “I do not endorse any ‘anti-vaccination’ position. Rather, I personally believe individuals should obtain informed-consent whenever receiving treatment of any kind from the appropriate provider. My personal opinions are completely separate from the professional obligations I uphold as a chiropractor; and completely separate from my chiropractic practice, which is also aligned with my professional obligations.”

Anderson-Peacock did not explain her endorsements, appearances or associations.

Amlinger, a former CCO president, has also been outspoken online about vaccination.

A 2015 post on the Amlinger Family Chiropractic Facebook page encouraged patients to get a chiropractic adjustment instead of a flu shot, claiming, mercury and aluminium in the shots may increase the chances of Alzheimer’s. Amlinger also wrote a piece for the Justine Blainey Wellness Centre’s website last year in which he discussed a document that claims pharmaceutical companies are colluding with health authorities to hide the “multiple dangers associated with vaccines.”

When I became aware that there was an article with my name on it on another person’s website, I acted to have it removed immediately

Dr. Peter Amlinger

Amlinger wrote: “Perhaps it is time more people start taking fewer drugs and start seeing a chiropractor on a regular basis. It is time for humanity to wake up and stop blindly poisoning themselves.”

While the statements are no longer available online, the Post had obtained screenshots and recovered archived versions of them after their disappearance.

Asked about the posts, Amlinger said, “When I became aware of both the Facebook post, which was made by a former associate, I removed it immediately. When I became aware that there was an article with my name on it on another person’s website, I acted to have it removed immediately.

“I believe that vaccination is a public health issue. I believe the public is entitled to a robust informed consent process for any type of care they are entertaining.” Amlinger also said he “was commenting in my personal capacity and not in my capacity as a CCO council member.”

In recent speeches, meanwhile, Hardick has praised a chiropractor who drove around town in a hearse with a sign featuring a hypodermic needle dripping blood and the slogan, “Drugs Kill — Whether Pushed or Prescribed!” Hardick has also been a speaker at the California-based chiropractic conference Cal Jam and has appeared on Cal Jam podcasts. This year Cal Jam features appearances by anti-vaccine advocate Bigtree and Dr. James Chestnut, a B.C.- based chiropractor who questions the legitimacy of the data behind widespread public flu vaccination.

Hardick did not vaccinate his son, B.J. Hardick, himself a high-profile chiropractor who has expressed concern online about mercury in vaccines. Clifford Hardick did not respond to the Post’s request for comment.

Timothy Caulfield, a University of Alberta professor and author of The Vaccination Picture, said these kinds of postings and comments don’t help the public.

“This is tremendously frustrating — but, unfortunately, not terribly surprising. There is a history of anti-vaxx rhetoric among the chiropractic community. Despite recent efforts to push the profession toward a more science-based approach, this harmful noise persists.”

Dr. Murray Katz, a Montreal-based physician and longtime critic of chiropractic says confusing the public about vaccination must stop. “This is dangerous, irresponsible and clearly shows they and the board which accepted them should all be replaced by the Minister of Health, who should impose a scientific standard on the profession.”

Like opposition critic Gélinas, Caulfield says the situation in the CCO demands that the Ontario government investigate.

“These are individuals involved in the governance of the chiropractic profession,” he said. “Can people who embrace pseudoscience weed out pseudoscience? Nope. Clearly action is needed.”

Delight

4th May 2019, 07:20

Brian Hooker is interviewed here and talks about Poland which has 100% mandatory vaccination with fines $12,000 per child for resistance. He reports that the model in Poland is where the US is headed if allowed.

As with all who dare to question main stream vaccine propaganda, he is painted as a dangerous disruptor of health when he is actually providing sound science.

Brian Hooker discusses the Lazarus report that the CDC has tried to bury.

u0QflOKlzgY

The Lazarus report referenced in interview (http://www.robertscottbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011-VAERS-automation.pdf)

Mandatory Vaccination – The Poland Experience By Dr. Brian Hooker
Brian S. Hooker, PH.D., P.E.
May 2, 2019 (https://www.focusforhealth.org/mandatory-vaccination-poland-experience-dr-brian-hooker/)

I recently was invited to speak at a Sejm (Poland’s lower house of Parliament) briefing on mandatory vaccination and vaccine injury by Mr. Pawel Skutecki, a deputy in the Sejm. Many citizens of Poland are concerned about the restrictions that are in place on medical and personal rights exemptions and are seeking to change the laws governing vaccine mandates. My other hosts for the trip were Ms. Justyna Socha, Mr. Piotr Jawornik, and Mr. Arkadiusz Tetela.

Justyna and Piotr are President and Vice President of the organization STOP-NOP (Stop Mandatory Vaccination) in Poland, and Arkadiusz is a vaccine injury attorney in the Polish court system. My hosts were extremely gracious and I consider them heroes in the face of very aggressive vaccine mandates for children in Poland.

According to my hosts, there are no philosophical or religious exemptions to vaccines in Poland. The only way to “opt out” of any vaccines on the schedule is to pay a fine of approximately $12,000 per child, or to fight against the mandates individually in civil court.

According to the Polish Minister of Health, “Resignation from mandatory vaccinations is impossible. Thanks to mandatory vaccination we maintain high immunization coverage and protect the weakest who cannot be immunized.”

In addition, the vaccination schedule for infants and children is very aggressive compared to the vaccination schedule in the United States. Polish infants receive the Hepatitis B and the BCG (tuberculosis) vaccine on the first day of life. In addition, the whole cell pertussis vaccine within the DPT (diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus) vaccine is given to infants at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months. Most of the world’s developed countries abandoned this vaccine formulation prior to 2000 due to a strong propensity to cause vaccine adverse events.

Other vaccines on the infant schedule include the Haemophilus influenza B (Hib), MMR, polio, and pneumococcal pneumonia vaccines. According to my hosts, health ministers in Poland are also pushing to add other vaccines to the schedule, including the HPV vaccine series for adolescents.

Given this onerous vaccination schedule, it was no wonder my hosts are pushing to overturn country-wide vaccine mandates in the Sejm, as well as reform the court system to ease the burden-of-proof for vaccine injury. According to Justyna Socha, there was an initiative signed by nearly 100,000 Polish citizens to overturn vaccine mandates, but it was rejected by an overwhelming majority of the Sejm.

As a concession in this defeat, the Sejm agreed to host a series of briefings on vaccine safety with speakers selected by Deputy Pawel Skutecki and the officers of STOP-NOP. Dr. Christopher Exley, one of the speakers at a previous briefing, is a very prolific and distinguished researcher from the UK. Dr. Exley discussed the link between aluminum toxicity in vaccines and developmental disabilities, including autism.

At the briefing, I was joined by Ms. Senta Depuydt, a journalist from Belgium who has written and studied vaccine injury extensively especially in the EU and is the mother of a vaccine injured child. Ms. Depuydt discussed the politics of vaccine mandates and highlighted different policies among the EU countries. In addition, Ms. Ola Yarimiychuk Gouk, a journalist from the Ukraine, spoke regarding the lack of any recourse for vaccine injury in her country.

My presentation covered flaws and outright fraudulent statistical methods in research studies claiming vaccine safety in the increasing epidemic of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. I focused somewhat on issues within the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention since much of the developed world follows the CDC’s lead regarding vaccine safety.

The briefing was well-attended with approximately 50 people including 10 deputies of the Sejm. There were many positive questions regarding vaccine safety from the attendees. There was one negative comment from a pediatrician who insisted that “vaccines do not cause autism” and that anti-vaccinationists were responsible for recent measles outbreaks in the news.

The Polish Minister of Health declined to attend the briefing, claiming that he would not give credence to anti-vaccinationist arguments. This was extremely unfortunate, given the real concerns of my hosts in a country with little or no recourse for families who are “vaccine hesitant” or have vaccine injured children. Branding brave individuals who dare question the safety of bloated infant and child vaccination schedules as “anti-vaccine” serves no one and is just meant to shut down a much needed dialogue to preserve the best health for children everywhere!

I am grateful to my hosts for their overwhelming hospitality for a “trip of a lifetime” to Poland and to understand the issues facing those who are “vaccine hesitant” in other nations. My discussions with them were eye-opening, especially regarding pharma greed around the world.

My hosts at STOP-NOP are sponsoring an International Protest against Mandatory Vaccination on June 2 in Warsaw, Poland and I encourage any folks in the EU who can travel to Poland to join them in their incredible work.

Measles Madness: Dr. Brian Hooker’s Statement to WA Legislators
By Brian S. Hooker, Science Advisor, Focus for Health and Board Member, Children’s Health Defense
FEBRUARY 19, 2019
This article originally published by Focus for Health.
(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/measles-madness-dr-brian-hookers-statement-to-wa-legislators/)
Dr. Hooker provided testimony last Friday, February 8, 2019, for the Washington State House Health Committee regarding the vaccines and the Personal Belief Exemption (PBE) bill that was introduced.

Recent outbreaks of measles, especially in Rockland County, New York and Clark County, Washington have created quite a furor in the public health infrastructure of the U.S. and now within state legislatures. Industry front groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) have seized the opportunity to introduce legislation to remove personal belief exemptions and religious exemptions for vaccinations required for school attendance. Nationwide, over 70 different bills have been introduced or are expected to be introduced in state legislatures to limit these types of exemptions.

I recently had the privilege to testify in the Health Committee in the House of Representatives for Washington State and wanted to share some excerpts of my testimony. In Washington State, legislators have introduced a bill to remove the personal belief exemption specifically for the Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine. I want to thank Karl Kanthak and Bernadette Pajer who both contributed important information for my testimony.

… it’s not low vaccination rates, it’s actually high vaccination rates with a vaccine product unable to provide lifetime immunity
The following is taken from my testimony:
There is a problem with measles in Washington State, but it’s not low vaccination rates, it’s actually high vaccination rates with a vaccine product unable to provide lifetime immunity or vigorous passive maternal protection to infants during the first year of life.

When the measles vaccine was first introduced, most people over the age of 15 who had wild measles had lifetime immunity. In developed nations, like other communicable infections, measles was no longer dangerous except in rare circumstances because of inadequate nutrition, poor sanitation, and / or lack of healthcare. Because having the measles was a routine part of childhood, teens, adults, parents, and grandparents were immune. And because of maternal passive immunity, infants were protected. The death rate due to measles in Washington State in the four years prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine was 1.4 in 10,000 cases and approximately 2 in 1,000,000 in the general population.

Legislators are being told that use of personal and religious belief exemptions are putting the public’s health in danger. They are told that two infants were recently exposed to measles and the babies are in danger. But in fact, if the mothers of the children had wild measles when they were children and they are nursing, the babies may be protected. If the mothers were vaccinated, even if they are nursing, they may not be. Additionally, maternal antibodies transported across the placenta can provide vital immunity against measles for infants.

Pushing vaccination rates up even higher with an ineffective product is not the answer. As the editor of the journal Vaccine Dr. Gregory Poland of The Mayo Clinic stated in 1994, “…as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.” An MMR vaccination rate of 75% has been reported for the recent measles cluster in Rockland County, New York.

… vaccination does not guarantee immunization and infectious diseases routinely break out in highly vaccinated communities.
It was reported in the news and provided to legislators that in Clark County, WA there is a 22% exemption rate, but this is based on the voluntary Immunization Information Survey (IIS) which does not accurately reflect the vaccination status of all children enrolled in Washington schools. When compared to the more accurate CDC statistics for the state of Washington for MMR coverage among 19 to 35 month olds, it is 95.3% +/- 2.6%. The IIS erroneously reports this number at 81.8% and cannot be relied upon.

The current personal belief exemption rate for K-12 for the MMR vaccine in Washington State is only 2.9% (WA DOH School Survey). Vaccination rates for kindergarteners for at least one MMR vaccine are at least 93% (WA DOH School Survey). Washington State has achieved the public health goal of very high vaccination rates.

As I have already remarked, vaccination does not guarantee immunization and infectious diseases routinely break out in highly vaccinated communities. An example of this is pertussis outbreaks, which occur due to problems with the acellular pertussis portion of the DTaP and Tdap vaccine, creating asymptomatic carriers. An asymptomatic carrier is a person that has become infected with a pathogen, but who display no signs nor symptoms. Although unaffected by the pathogen themselves, carriers can transmit it to others or develop symptoms in later stages of disease.

SB277 [removal of personal belief exemptions in CA] did not “change the minds” of non-vaccinating parents. Instead, it pushed families out of school and created lost income to school districts.
The SB277 experience in California, where personal belief exemptions were struck down in 2016, has not led to 100% vaccine compliance even within the school system. Removal of personal belief exemptions has served to alienate parents leading to an exodus from the school system (1.2%), as well as from the state, and placing the school districts in the untenable role of “vaccination enforcers.” An additional 1.4% within the school district are still unvaccinated due to Federal Individualized Education Programs, medical and other exemptions. SB277 did not change the minds of non-vaccinating parents. Instead, it pushed families out of school and created lost income to school districts.

Regarding the Australian experience with vaccine mandates, one official stated that, “Parents reported a greater commitment to their decision not to vaccinate and an increased desire to maintain control over health choices for their children including an unprecedented willingness to become involved in protest action.” (J. Public Health Policy 2018 39:156, Helps et al.) With the removal of the PBE for the MMR vaccine, 2.9% of the children in WA State, which is 15,000 to 20,000 students, will be excluded from school. If the PBE is removed for all vaccines required for school attendance, 37,000 children will be removed from school. For small school districts, this will cause a financial crisis. Mandates do not encourage vaccination, they push exemption-using families out of schools.

Over the past ten years in the U.S., there has been one reported death from the measles . . . During the same time period (based on VAERS reports), there have been 105 reported deaths associated with the MMR or MMRV vaccinations.
The Supreme Court in the Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth case called vaccinations “unavoidably unsafe,” and the scientific literature shows an incidence of vaccine adverse events that is dangerous in light of the proposed mandate. Over the past ten years in the U.S., there has been one reported death from the measles, and it is unclear based on the medical history of the patient whether and how measles played a role in their death. During the same time period (based on Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports), there have been 105 reported deaths associated with the MMR or MMRV vaccinations.

From 2006 to 2011, the CDC funded a project by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. for the automation of the VAERS database. VAERS up to this point has been a passive surveillance system based on voluntary reporting of vaccine adverse events (AEs) and CDC officials were concerned about underreporting of such events. The team from Harvard Pilgrim set up a monitoring system of a large health care provider (with 35 clinics) and monitoring the outcomes of from 1.4 million vaccines received. Using chart abstraction, 35,570 potential adverse events were reported within a window of 30 days post-vaccination. In other words, the rate of potential adverse events was 2.6%. As legislators, you are feeling pressure to protect infants and others susceptible to poor infection outcome, but taking away the personal belief exemption for an ineffective product is not the answer.

You must not only protect those who are susceptible to poor infection outcome, but protect those who are susceptible to poor vaccination outcome, and to consider the unintended consequences of a fully vaccinated population that does not have lifetime immunity.

This is another good interview. Barbara Loe Fisher states that if we don't do something, the noose that I have suspected is absolutely what is planned... cradle to grave vaccination or complete social ostracization.

Just google vaccine resistance and one sees a blanket of fear mongering aimed at vaccine hesitance. If there ever was a paradigm crisis in which one must choose what we should risk for fundamental human rights, IMO this is the it for our lifetime.

yF0QkF7Mqu8

Delight

5th May 2019, 05:10

If one goes to google to look up profiles of people in the news regarding this extremely important subject, one gets the equivalent of the Saturday Night Live analysis of the measles epidemic and vaccination hesitancy.

Wfl-uMVbNn8

Physicians For Informed Consent who present information like this letter are routinely vilified as quacks

Re: The unofficial vaccine educators: are CDC funded non-profits sufficiently independent? (https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5104/rr-13)
18 November 2017
Shira Miller
Physician
Physicians for Informed Consent
California, USA
picphysicians
Dear Editor,
We commend Doshi on citing “insufficient evidence” for a benefit from mandatory influenza vaccination in healthcare workers and exposing conflicts of interest. [1] In the same vein, our organization has found that it has not been proven that the MMR vaccine results in less death or permanent disability than what is expected from measles.[2] The risk of dying or suffering permanent injury from measles in the United States was very small, even before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. Therefore, vaccine safety studies must show that the risk of dying or suffering permanent injury from the MMR vaccine is even smaller.

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, right before the measles mass vaccination program was introduced, the chance of dying from measles was 1 in 10,000 or 0.01%.[3] However, the public is generally unaware of this figure as the CDC publishes case-fatality rates based on the number of reported cases only. Since it is estimated that nearly 90% of measles cases are benign and therefore not reported to the CDC, the widely publicized measles case-fatality rate is 10 times higher than what is actually found in the general population.

Furthermore, a large 2004 Danish epidemiological study published in JAMA found that the risk of febrile seizures after MMR vaccination is 1 in 640[4] —a five-fold higher risk of febrile seizure than the risk of seizure from measles.[5] Vestergaard et al. studied the association between MMR and seizures in about 537,000 Danish children 0 to 14 days following MMR vaccination and found 1.56 MMR-related febrile seizure cases per 1,000 vaccinated children aged 15 to 17 months (95% CI, 1.44 to 1.68). Vestergaard’s results are based on 973 febrile seizures within two weeks of MMR vaccination, a robust database containing about 18,000 febrile seizures, and a nonvaccinated control group of about 98,000 children. Applying the 1 in 640 risk of febrile seizure to the 3.64 million U.S. children (91% vaccination rate applied to 4 million children[6]) vaccinated with MMR every year results in about 5,700 annual MMR-related seizures.

Measles surveillance in the 1980s and 1990s revealed that there are 3 to 3.5 times more measles seizures than measles deaths.[5] Therefore, because the measles case-fatality rate is 1 in 10,000, the seizure rate from measles is 3 to 3.5 in 10,000 (mean 1 in 3,100). Although 1.56 MMR-related febrile seizures in 1,000 (about 1 in 640) is a small risk, it is five-fold higher than the 1 in 3,100 risk of seizures from measles.[5] In addition, a significant portion of febrile seizures have permanent sequelae. A large 2007 epidemiological study found that 5% of febrile seizures result in epilepsy.[7]

A query of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for symptoms involving seizures and convulsions from all measles vaccines (for U.S. children age 6 months to 2 years, between 2011 and 2015) results in about 90 seizure reports per year.[8] This is only 1.6% of the about 5,700 expected MMR-related seizures based on Vestergaard’s findings. Other serious vaccine adverse events after MMR, including deaths, may similarly be underreported.

As with mandatory influenza vaccination, there is insufficient evidence that mandatory measles vaccination results in a net public health benefit.

Sincerely,
Shira Miller, M.D.
President, Physicians for Informed Consent

References:
1. Doshi P. The unofficial vaccine educators: are CDC funded non-profits sufficiently independent? BMJ 2017; 359:j5104. http://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5104.

2. Physicians for Informed Consent. Measles – Vaccine Risk Statement (VRS). Oct 2017. https://www.physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/vrs.

3. Physicians for Informed Consent. Measles – Disease Information Statement (DIS). Oct 2017. https://www.physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/dis.

4. Vestergaard M, Hviid A, Madsen KM, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Schendel D, et al. MMR vaccination and febrile seizures: evaluation of susceptible subgroups and long-term prognosis. JAMA 2004;292(3):351-357. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15265850.

5. Centers for Disease Control. Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases. 13th ed. Hamborsky J, Kroger A, Wolfe S, editors. Washington D.C.: Public Health Foundation; 2015. 209-15. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html.

6. Centers for Disease Control. Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases. 13th ed. Hamborsky J, Kroger A, Wolfe S, editors. Washington D.C.: Public Health Foundation; 2015. Appendix E-8. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/appdx-fu....

7. Vestergaard M, Pedersen C, Sidenius P, Olsen J, Christensen J. The long-term risk of epilepsy after febrile seizures in susceptible subgroups. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr 15;165(8):911-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk086.

8. CDC wonder: about the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [cited 2017 Nov 14]. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.

Here is a discussion from last year that is unfolding today.

10h3HmkS-l8

Dr. Humphries like most of us did not always know that vaccination is not necessary or effective or safe. Dr Tennpenny has also evolved in her understanding. No one of us needs to feel bad that we did not know the truth.

Dr Sherri Tennpenny and Dr Suzanne Humphries 20 Jan 18

zTNpimWIQA0

Delight

5th May 2019, 06:23

Whack a mole vaccination assumes that ridding the person of all the targets of vaccines will be a good thing.

Caljam 2018 invasive bacterial vaccines of childhood. Tonsillectomies, antibiotics, and vaccines.

Dr Suzanne Humphries
Published on Feb 23, 2018

The title is "The whack-a-mole vaccine game" because drugs and vaccines that attempt to abolish organisms can backfire and make it worse for the whole community. Antibiotics, vaccines, and even tonsillectomy change the personal and community microbiome.

It's been shown in medical literature for a long time. Dr Humphries breaks down the information with PMID numbers for you.
cdyXhe3W678

Delight

5th May 2019, 18:12

Vaxxed (the film) was a documentary that revealed a cover up at the CDC.

Vaxxed II is going to come out this year and is the documentary about the movie showings and Vaxxed team's travel across the US talking to parents, politicians and providers. The stories of negative health effects directly linked by the parents with vaccination flooded in.

Many health professionals revealed they are in a huge dilemma as they see the evidence themselves and face cognitive dissonance.

5yNcaLjb45k

The culture of health care as it has been set up is an entrenched mesh of systems where even those who know feel afraid to speak out.

KNvDsz-kzqA

Physicians are enculturated into a religion but some lose the faith as they gain knowledge.

_jQ-LD7jEf0

So we can gain information BUT when law mandates, we have no choice. In the face of LAW all the information cannot help. Politicians make the laws. We have to make this political.

Democrats and Republicans Remain Divided As Ever Over Vaccine Laws
Jim Satney May 4, 2019
(https://prepforthat.com/democrats-and-republicans-remain-divided-as-ever-over-mandatory-vaccine-laws/)
There’s a war outside our windows. It’s a social war that many of you never thought would see the light of day. As it’s intensity swells, some wonder if we are on the cusp of the new “climate change debate.” We may be.

The war over vaccines was always considered to be between outlier elitists and the commoners – the conspiracy theorists and science – the parents of reportedly injured children and the parents in pandemic fear of the other side. You never cared if politicians supported vaccines, in fact, you vaccinated your children. But, forcing vaccines through policy is a hard line in the sand.

Media coverage over vaccine skepticism was at one time reduced to soundbites of Jenny McCarthy shouting down the MMR shot. Or unconfirmed reports of Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel’s avoidance of vaccines. The outrage existed. The harsh debates between both sides were always dug in. But politically, alliances were messier. The term “anti-vaxxer” was applied to no political side. In fact, an “anti-vaxxer’s” political alliance was always a crapshoot. You never knew.

That’s changed. And that could mean that the vaccination issue is reaching an apex or tipping point. In the past, the anti-vaccine movement suffered from its non-political-affiliation. Without a side of the aisle firmly supportive, any cause becomes less amplified. It can’t organize. It gets left off the debate stage. If it isn’t being debated by politicians, it’s largely ignored. No side can “win.”

The Republican party is beginning to back the anti-vaccine movement. But even that statement needs clarity. As so often is the case, politicians tend to twist context when they argue matters. Democrats are calling just about any opposition to anything vaccine-related “anti-vaxxer.” And it’s backfiring. Because common-sense people can distinguish context and complexity. The end game for Democrats is to classify the common person who doesn’t believe in mandatory flu shots as “someone who thinks vaccines cause Autism.” The media’s on-board, the problem is, America isn’t. And the Republican party has seen the light.

Before I dive in further, no, I’m not saying vaccines cause autism. I don’t love Republicans, they’ve been robbing us as long as Democrats have been robbing us. I’m arguing that Republicans realize parents want medical rights over their children, even if they do worry about anti-vaccine neighbors. And now the GOP is dug in on the issue because they realize its more 2020 campaign fuel (a lot more).

Anti-Vaccine or Parental Rights?
The term “anti-vaccine” is widely misused in the media and by politicians. The United States undoubtedly is home to numerous anti-vaxxers. These are people who firmly believe that vaccines are responsible for injuries. Some believe that the government uses vaccines to sicken the herd. Others believe vaccines are a globalist weapon.

But Democrats determine that those parents who support vaccines, just not the timeline schedule, are anti-vaxxers. Some believe that there are too many vaccines – Dems stamp them as anti-vaxxers. Some people just don’t want a flu shot – rinse, wash, repeat. This is inaccurate labeling. If someone accepts vaccines, just on a delayed or altered schedule, they hardly warrant a dramatic label. The cubicle worker that refuses a flu shot doesn’t warrant the label.

Mislabeling as political savvy gets worse when we branch out into parental rights supporters. And this is the crux of the sticky situation. Many Republicans that are called “anti-vaxxers” state over and over that they are simply for parental rights.

Take Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) as a prime example. He’s stated that his children are vaccinated, but he’s vehemently opposed to government mandates. Paul is a revered eye surgeon. He earned a medical degree from Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, N.C. Paul’s stance is that we shouldn’t trade our liberty for a false sense of security.

That’s not anti-vaccine, that’s merely Paul being consistent with his core beliefs. Yet, last month, CSPAN ran a headline linking Paul to anti-vaccine advocates. Sure, those against all vaccines would support a politician that opposes laws mandating their use. That’s fair. But Paul’s condemnation centers around parental rights. That’s the core competency of his argument. But it’s intentionally missed as a way to create outrage over the matter. And that’s good for no one.

Republicans Are Digging In…The Great Vaccine Divide Has Legs
Democrats are responding to media outrage over measles outbreaks by writing bills that strengthen immunization laws. Lawmakers in New Jersey, Arizona, Colorado, New York, and Maine, have authored bills that remove vaccine exemptions or drastically restrict them. But those bills are facing new opposition: Republicans. In Washington state, SB 1638, which removes personal exemptions, passed 25-22. The votes went almost exactly down party lines.

Republicans are opting to support parental rights in the face of harsh criticism. And this may have massive 2020 campaign consequences. Here’s why.

The “anti-vaccine” movement, an all-encompassing term that intentionally misleads, was always non-political. Even states such as West Virginia and Mississippi, long regarded as two of the strictest vaccine states in the nation, suddenly have Republican-authored bills to lessen restrictive exemption processes. Republicans are calling for more attainable vaccine exemptions in the face of media outrage over measles. Is there a redder state than Mississippi? What a conundrum for Democrats. Mississippi has been notoriously strict on vaccine exemptions. Prior to California’s mandatory vaccine law passage, Mississippi was the strictest.

One of the reddest states in American history, the strictest vaccine state in America, is suddenly considering loosening up exemption laws.

Democratic strategic mislabeling is backfiring on Democrats. The consequence is red states shifting away from their traditional values. This is hardly Republican support for vaccine rights, this is the consequence of people running far away from Democrat lunacy. Every issue Democrats stroke turns into a dumpster fire. The mandatory vaccine issue is no different.

In 2015, then Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton famously Tweeted,

@HillaryClinton
The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and #vaccineswork. Let's protect all our kids. #GrandmothersKnowBest

Clinton’s Tweet reflected the extent that most politicians went in terms of vaccine rhetoric. While Clinton’s Tweet made her opinion clear, it didn’t bury her in political polls. She didn’t buy ads pushing vaccines.

Democrats in 2019, however, are buying ad space to warn of anti-vaccine dangers. New York Senators launched an ad campaign pushing for “acceptance” of vaccines. The bigger issue is that New York initiated the first ever mandatory vaccine bill on all people.

“I know that other politicians promote legislation that promotes vaccines, but I’ve never seen an advertising campaign favoring vaccines (from them), I’ve only seen that from public health departments,” Robert Krakow, the attorney who represents NY parents against the mandatory vaccine law, said. “This is very unusual.”

“Generally, I just don’t think it’s the role of a legislator,” he added.

Here’s the formula for failure.

As Democrats continue to mislabel, they similarly continue to embolden the group they war with. The anti-vaccine group is swelling, but only because Democrats keep dropping more and more seeds into its soil.

The working Joe that just doesn’t want a flu shot is now an anti-vaxxer. He’s voted Democrat his entire life. But now suddenly, he’s condemned by his own party. The liberty-minded folks among us that are anti-Trump are now tested by the same anti-vax term. They merely want Americans to retain medical rights over their children. They’ve said nothing about autism and vaccines.

For the first time in history, there is a true political divide over vaccines. Democrats are for mandatory vaccines, Republicans are against it. Democrats believe that someone who doesn’t’ want a flu shot, or delays the vaccine schedule, or doesn’t believe in mandatory vaccines, is an anti-vaxxer. The Republican voting base is swelling because Democrats keep widening the scope of voters.

Suddenly, voters must consider the mandatory vaccine issue. And they now see a hard line in the sand between Democrats and Republicans.

Republicans are riding a wave of parental rights protection. They realize that most Americans don’t want the government deciding which medicines their children should take. And they are willing to ride the wave, confidently, into 2020. Republicans consistently say they support vaccines, but not vaccine mandates. In Texas, the Tea Party created the anti-vax PAC in 2015. It’s stalled out, but it could see more funding as media outrage continues to deliver on the nightly news.

Some media personalities are bucking the trend. Tucker Carlson consistently features the who’s who over mandatory vaccine opposition on his prime time show.

Tucker isn’t against vaccines.

“They piled on you,” Carlson said to Kennedy in his usual disingenuous way. “Why? Why is raising questions about the safety of vaccines a no-go zone?”

Tucker is playing to the anti-censorship crowd. And it’s working.

The vaccine debate is quickly becoming the new climate change. And it’s growing via the same liberal incompetence of mislabeling. Most people believe we should temper our use of automobiles, or that flying big passenger jets contributes to some environmental degradation. But a lot of us don’t think that it will stop snowing on Mount Kilimanjaro two years ago (hint, this never happened, sorry Al Gore).

Don’t think that the world will end in 2025? You’re a climate change denier. Once you are labeled a climate change denier, you begin to experience disdain by the labeler. The labeler is the Democratic party.

This is how mislabeling backfires. It reduces an otherwise logical issue to mayhem. It becomes too inclusive. It forces people to take a side. Suddenly you’re voting for Donald Trump, a former reality TV star. That’s how these equations flush out.

The Democratic party has a bad habit of going too extreme at all the wrong times. And they are doing it again. Vaccines are worth public discussions. But we can’t have these discussions when over half our population is being shouted down with misdirected, strategic labels.

The Republican Strategy Is Simple: Vote Dem, Be Forced To Vaccinate
Imagine a world where the state forces you to vaccinate. Or the state removes your rights to guns. It’s all conspiracy theory until it isn’t. The reckless Democratic party plays their initial hand well. When Republican voters claim things like “gun grab” or “forced vaccinations,” the Democratic party paints them as conspiracy theorists that we should disregard.

In the early discussions, the strategy plays well.

But then…

New York mandates vaccines for all citizens in specific Burroughs. Senate Bill 5062 would have banned all magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds (that’s most every standard gun type). Suddenly, people feel lied to and deceived. This leads to distrust and emboldens those “conspiracy theorists” to leverage new theories.

Bypass Censorship. Join 1000's, Subscribe Today
Enter Email Address
Americans keep waiting for a Democrat to rise up and find the middle. But with each passing day, such an event seems less and less likely.

Parents Choosing Homeschool Options More Than Ever
The result of more stringent mandatory vaccine policies is increased homeschool rates. In 2010, there were 2 million homeschool students in the United States. In 2016, the number rose to 2.3 million. We can’t blame mandatory vaccine laws alone, many parents are choosing to homeschool based on a variety of influences. But it is difficult to argue that parents aren’t opting out of public schools as a way to avoid these laws.

But now the media and politicians are attacking homeschool families. Just last week, Fox News published a piece titled “‘House of Horrors’ child abuse cases reveals how offenders nationwide use homeschooling to hide their crimes.”

The article focuses on several recent high-profile child abuse cases. But these cases are the exception rather than the rule.

One of the primary cases the article focuses on is the horrible case of David and Louise Turpin. The California couple held their 13 kids hostage and regularly abused them.

“Imagine if the Turpins had at least an annual check,” Coleman said, referring to the California parents, David and Louise Turpin, who last week was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. “There’s no way they could have been seen by a doctor or a certified teacher and skated that long.”

This reads reasonably at first glance. But a problem arises when Coleman says medical records are the essential driver in potential home reviews.

“We’d like to have medical records required of families who homeschool and have standardized tests or portfolios reviewed by teachers, or doctors, or counselors, social workers, or clergy, each year,” Coleman said. “Then we can notice if there’s something egregious.”

Would they only look for abuse? Or would they monitor the status of chickenpox or flu vaccines? In the U.K, one town is creating a homeschool registry.

This is where voters may get uneasy about government intervention into homeschooling.

Always know your homeschool state laws before making the decision to pull your child from school. In the

Democrats and Vaccines: 2020 Candidates – Strangely Absent From Mandatory Chatter
It’s important to distinguish between those who promote vaccines for health purposes and those who push for mandatory vaccine laws. I don’t believe those pushing for vaccines as a benefit to society suffer political consequences. In reality, Republicans are promoting the same idea. The fallout comes from those who push for mandatory vaccinations. Democratic Presidential candidates are eluding the mandatory issue. They’re allowing the radicals in their party test the waters.

But at some point, they’ll be asked point blank over mandatory vaccines. Will they shun the radicals in their party?

democrats vaccines elizabeth warren
Editorial credit: / Shutterstock.com

Elizabeth Warren and Vaccines
Warren hasn’t stated her position on mandatory vaccinations, but like most of her policies, she wants tax payer funding and universal access.

“When the polio and measles vaccines became available for the first time, parents lined up to make sure their kids would be protected,” Warren said at a congressional hearing in 2015. “They’d lived in a world of infectious diseases that destroyed children’s futures, and they desperately wanted to leave that world behind.”

“The more we do on the front end to ensure that everyone gets access to vaccines, the less we’ll see individuals contracting hepatitis A, measles, whooping cough, and all of the other vaccine-preventable diseases. We must make sure there is robust public health funding so people have access to vaccines,” Warren said.

Kamala Harris Supported California’s Mandatory Vaccine Law, SB277
kamala harris vaccines
photo credit: shutterstock

Harris is reportedly in favor of mandatory vaccinations. The assumption is based on her office’s support of SB277. She’s yet to make her own definitive statement. Her spokesperson said, “She thinks people should get vaccines.”

Bernie Sanders Likely Supports Strict Vaccine Laws
When asked about whether or not he supports mandatory vaccinations.

“Obviously, vaccinations work. Vaccination has worked for many, many years,” Sen. Bernie Sanders told The Daily Beast. “I am sensitive to the fact that there are some families who disagree but the difficulty is if I have a kid who is suffering from an illness who is subjected to a kid who walks into a room without vaccines that could kill that child and that’s wrong.”

In 2004, Sanders argued with an FDA representative when he contended that flu vaccine shortages were harming people’s health.

Amy Klobuchar Supports Universal Flu Vaccines
She’s yet to dig in on the issue of mandatory vaccines.

“Last year’s flu was the worst we’ve seen in years and with the next flu season starting soon, we have to be prepared,” Klobuchar said. “The Flu Vaccine Act will support critical research at the National Institutes of Health to finally develop a universal vaccine so Minnesotans and all Americans can be better protected from all variations of the flu.”

“Flu shots are already available for the coming flu season, and we need to make funding available for a universal flu vaccine to end of this viral scourge,” Markey said. “Increased federal investment in a vaccine will help predict the right strain for the next season, produce a more optimal vaccine, and protect all Americans against all strains of this virus. I am pleased that we continue to invest in a flu-free future.”

Joe Biden Largely Absent From Vaccine Debate
He’s muttered very little over the issue.

“I look forward to the day when your grandchildren and my grandchildren and their children show up at the office to get their physical to start school and get a shot for measles and they get a vaccine that affects significant causes of cancer,” he said while discussing the Cancer Moonshot coalition in 2016.

Pete Buttigieg and Vaccines
Buttigieg believes strongly that states should have the option to enforce mandatory vaccine laws. He believes that religious and personal exemptions should only be allowed in states not facing a public health crisis. But, he doesn’t define “public health crisis.”

“The law of the land for more than a century has been that states may enforce mandatory vaccination for public safety to prevent the spread of a dangerous disease. Pete does support some exceptions, except during a public health emergency to prevent an outbreak,” a spokesperson stated on his behalf per Buzzfeed News.

“These exemptions include medical exemptions in all cases (as in cases where it is unsafe for the individual to get vaccinated), and personal/religious exemptions if states can maintain local herd immunity and there is no public health crisis,” the spokesperson said.

“Pete believes vaccines are safe and effective and are necessary to maintaining public health,” the spokesperson said. “There is no evidence that vaccines are unsafe, and he believes children should be immunized to protect their health. He is aware that in most states the law provides for some kinds of exemptions. He believes only medical exemptions should be allowed.”

Beto O’Rourke and Vaccines

The Democrat party has high hopes for this former Texas’ 16th congressional district rep. O’Rourke says that his children are vaccinated but stops short of pushing for mandatory bills.

“The evidence is clear and there is wide agreement among doctors and scientists that vaccination is the best course for our kids and our communities,” he said. “Beto and Amy have chosen to vaccinate their three children because they believe it is important to ensuring our country’s children are healthy, safe, and secure.”

“I know just about as much as any parent. All three of my kids are vaccinated,” O’Rourke said in a video posted by the group. “I know that this is an issue that some people have a difference of opinion on. I’m not as informed as I should be to give you a thoughtful answer.”

The Democrats Can’t Separate From Radicals
While Democrat party Presidential candidates may intentionally dodge the issue of mandatory vaccines, they’ll be dragged down by the radicals in their party. This is the same play they make on issues of gun bans. While their radicals support gun bans, Presidential candidates tend to say “gun control” and leave the meaning of that rather ambiguous.

But the radicals within are growing. And traditional Democrats are being pushed to make hard decisions. Democrats nationwide are voting down the party line in favor of mandatory vaccination laws. These 2020 candidates aren’t going to be able to shake that stigma. And Republicans are going to cash in at the polls next year.

Donald Trump is likely to win huge again next year. There is little doubt that a hyper-fueled economy will represent a big part of that. But it is difficult to ignore the Democrats’ inability to find the middle. A middle-ground candidate offers Dems a great chance at voting Trump out. But Republicans should rest easy, Democrats have shown no aptitude for this strategy.

Instead, they continue to move to increase their voting base. Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders are now supporting allowing prisoners to vote, including the Boston Marathon bomber. Rather than go moderate, they’ve chosen to go more radical. And this means few parents will trust any of these candidates with their rights.

frankstien

5th May 2019, 19:11

CBC Radio - Today Sunday May 5th has a show on vaccines.

Cross Country Checkup
Should the measles shot be mandatory?

So far this year, at least 41 cases of measles have been confirmed across Canada, hitting Quebec, British Columbia, Ontario, Alberta and the Northwest Territories.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization says that the number of reported cases around the globe has quadrupled in the first three months of 2019 compared to the same period last year.

The measles outbreak is, once again, stoking the vaccination debate, particularly on social media networks like Twitter and Facebook — two platforms which have struggled to contain the spread of misinformation.
(cough, cough, yeah that's the mainstream media's job)

Okay Project Avalon Team--have at it-- there's an 800 number--

Currently, Ontario and New Brunswick require proof of immunization for children and adolescents to attend school.

Our question this week: Should the measles shot be mandatory?

Join Duncan McCue Sunday, live simultaneously through six time zones on CBC Radio One, and streaming on cbc.ca, the CBC Radio app and Facebook Live.

1 p.m. PT, 2 p.m. MT, 3 p.m. CT, 4 p.m. ET, 5 p.m. AT, 5:30 p.m. NT.

Toll-free number during the broadcast: 1-888-416-8333

Email: checkup@cbc.ca
Twitter: @checkupcbc
Facebook: CBC Cross Country Checkup

From:
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/checkup/should-measles-vaccination-be-mandatory-1.5121146

Hervé

5th May 2019, 19:55

Example of vaccine created aggravations:

Fast-tracked dengue vaccine wreaks havoc in the Philippines, 600 child deaths under investigation (https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/05/03/719037789/botched-vaccine-launch-has-deadly-repercussions)

Michaeleen Doucleff NPR (https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/05/03/719037789/botched-vaccine-launch-has-deadly-repercussions)
Fri, 03 May 2019 14:45 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/520892/large/gettyimages_921966814_custom_7.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/520892/full/gettyimages_921966814_custom_7.jpg)
At a Feb. 21, 2018, Philippine Senate hearing in Manila on deaths linked to the dengue vaccine, families brought photos of children who had been vaccinated. © Noel Celis /AFP/Getty Images

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration just approved one of the most sought after vaccines in recent decades. It's the world's first vaccine to prevent dengue fever - a disease so painful that its nickname is "breakbone fever."

The vaccine, called Dengvaxia, is aimed at helping children in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories where dengue is a problem.

But this vaccine has a dark - and deadly - history. One that has led to criminal charges in the Philippines, sparked national panic and fueled a massive measles outbreak that has already killed more than 355 people.

The concern
That story begins on a stage in Manila in 2016.

A young girl, about age 9 or 10, sat on a chair surrounded by health officials. She wore a bright yellow T-shirt with the words "Dengue is dangerous" across it. She squeezed her eyes and bit her lip as the health secretary of the Philippines, Dr. Janette Garin, gave her a shot in the arm.

That shot launched a massive vaccine campaign to inoculate nearly 1 million schoolchildren with Dengvaxia. The goal was to save thousands of kids' lives and prevent an estimated 10,000 hospitalizations over a five-year period.

But in the end, estimates are that more than 100,000 Philippine children received a vaccine that health officials (https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/dengue/revised_SAGE_recommendations_dengue_vaccines_apr2018/en/) say increased (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1800820) their risk of a severe and sometimes deadly condition. In addition, other children who received the vaccine may have been endangered because, their parents alleged, they were not in good health.

The French pharmaceutical company Sanofi Pasteur spent 20 years - and about $2 billion - to develop Dengvaxia. The company tested it in several large trials with more than 30,000 kids globally and published (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1506223) the results in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine.

But halfway around the world from the Philippines, in a Washington, D.C., suburb, one scientist was worried about the new vaccine.

"When I read the New England Journal article, I almost fell out of my chair," says Dr. Scott Halstead (https://www.emedevents.com/speaker-profile/scott-b-halstead-800221), who has studied dengue for more than 50 years with the U.S. military. When Halstead looked at the vaccine's safety data in the clinical trial, he knew right away there was a problem.

For some children, the vaccine didn't seem to work. In fact, Halstead says, it appeared to be harmful. When those kids caught dengue after being vaccinated, the vaccine appeared to worsen the disease in some instances. Specifically, for children who had never been exposed to dengue, the vaccine seemed to increase the risk of a deadly complication called plasma leakage syndrome, in which blood vessels start to leak (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334930/) the yellow fluid of the blood.

"Then everything gets worse, and maybe it's impossible to save your life," Halstead says. "A child can go into shock."

"The trouble is that the disease occurs very rapidly, just in a matter of a few hours," he adds. "And there's nothing on the outside of the body to signify the person is leaking fluid on the inside."

The complication is rare, says Halstead. Still, he was so worried about the safety concerns that he wrote at least six editorials for scientific journals. He even made a video to warn the Philippine government about the problem.

"I just think, 'No, you can't give a vaccine to a perfectly normal, healthy person and then put them at an increased risk for the rest of their lives for plasma leakage syndrome,' " Halstead says. "You can't do that."

The vaccine manufacturer disagreed with Halstead's interpretation of the study's results. The company wrote (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27452651) a rebuttal, asserting that regulatory agencies had approved Dengvaxia "on the basis of the vaccine's proven protection and acceptable safety profile."

The company also said it would perform additional studies to "further assess the safety, efficacy and effectiveness" of the vaccine.

Despite these concerns, in July 2016, the World Health Organization went ahead and recommended the vaccine for all children ages 9 to 16.

"Yes, we did. It was what we call a 'conditional recommendation' with the emphasis to minimize potential risks," says Dr. Joachim Hombach (http://www.euvaccine.eu/people/joachim-hombach), who led WHO's review of the vaccine. "We saw the problems. We also clearly pointed to the data gaps."

WHO recommended that Sanofi do more experiments to better understand the vaccine's safety issues. In its assessment, WHO pointed out that the vaccine "may be ineffective or may theoretically even increase the future risk of hospitalized or severe dengue illness" in people who have never been exposed to dengue - which is about 10% to 20% of Philippine children.

WHO's recommendation came three months after the Philippines launched its mass vaccination campaign in April 2016.

A year and half later, that campaign came to a screeching halt.

The problem
In November 2017, Sanofi published (https://mediaroom.sanofi.com/en/press-releases/2017/sanofi-updates-information-on-dengue-vaccine/) an announcement on its website saying it had new information about Dengvaxia's safety.

Halstead's fears were confirmed. Sanofi had found evidence that the vaccine increases the risk of hospitalization and cytoplasmic leakage syndrome in children who had no prior exposure to dengue, regardless of age.
[B]"For individuals who have not been previously infected by dengue virus, vaccination should not be recommended," the company wrote.
Panic hit the Philippines. In news reports, parents said that the vaccine contributed to the deaths of 10 children. Protests erupted. The Congress of the Philippines launched investigations into the vaccine's purchase and the immunization campaign. And Philippine health officials started performing autopsies on children who died after receiving the vaccine. "In total, the deaths of about 600 children who received Dengvaxia are under investigation by the Public Attorney's Office, " the South China Morning Post reported (https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/3006712/philippines-suspicion-dengue-vaccine-linked) last month. Investigators have not yet released their results.

Here's the problem with Dengvaxia.

Typically, a vaccine works by triggering the immune system to make antibodies against the virus. These antibodies then fight off the virus during an infection.

But dengue is a tricky virus. Dengue antibodies don't always protect a person. In fact, these antibodies can make an infection worse. The dengue virus actually uses the antibodies to help it spread through the body. So a second infection with dengue - when your blood already has antibodies in it - can actually be worse than the first; a person is at a higher risk of severe complications like plasma leakage syndrome.

In its follow-up study, Sanofi found evidence that Dengvaxia acts like the first infection for a person who has not been previously infected. The body produces antibodies against the vaccine, which have a similar potential for harm.

The increased risk seems small. The vaccine raises the risk of hospitalization after a dengue infection from about 1.1% to 1.6%, the follow-up study from Sanofi found (https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1506223?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). So out of 1 million kids in the Philippines, the vaccine would cause about 1,000 to be hospitalized over five years, Sanofi estimated (https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1506223?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). (On the other hand, the vaccine would prevent about 12,000 hospitalizations for a new dengue infection in children who have had a prior dengue infection during this same time period.)

But in the world of vaccines, that's not an acceptable risk. A risk needs to be exceedingly small to be tolerated. For example, with the measles vaccine, the risk of encephalitis is about 1 in 1 million, or 1,000 times less than the risk from a measles infection, WHO says (https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/tools/MMR_vaccine_rates_information_sheet.pdf).

WHO eventually changed its recommendation. The agency now says the vaccine is safe only for children who have had a prior dengue infection.

By the time Sanofi acknowledged this problem with the vaccine, about 800,000 Philippine children had been vaccinated. The Sanofi study estimated that more than 100,000 of them had never been infected with dengue and should not have received the shot, according to WHO's revised recommendation (https://www.who.int/medicines/news/2017/WHO-advises-dengvaxia-used-only-in-people-previously-infected/en/).

Given the concerns by Halstead and the initial unknowns about the vaccine's safety, Philippine parents should have been warned about a potential risk, says Dr. Isabel Rodriguez (https://medicine.ucsf.edu/people/isabel-rodriguez-barraquer) at the University of California, San Francisco.

"What bothers me most about this story is risk communication," says Rodriguez, who studies dengue in South America. "There was a lot of uncertainty from the beginning [about the vaccine's safety]. That needed to be communicated explicitly. You need to be honest about what evidence is out there."

Dr. Su-Peing Ng, global medical head of Sanofi Pasteur, says the company followed all World Health Organization guidelines while developing the vaccine and communicated honestly throughout the process.

"We've always been very transparent in sharing the results of our research," Ng says.

"And I just want to stress that we have full confidence in our vaccine as it's been approved by regulatory agencies in over 20 countries."
In hindsight, Ng says, Sanofi wouldn't do anything differently with the development of the vaccine: "No, we have been very, very close to the research community, working closely with them over the last 20 years in the effort to find a solution for public health needs."

The repercussions
In April, the Philippine government indicted 14 government officials over the deaths of 10 children who received the Dengvaxia vaccine. The government said the officials acted with "undue haste" in procuring the vaccine and launching the mass immunization campaign. The Philippine Department of Justice said the campaign started before the clinical trials were finished

In some instances children were given the vaccine by untrained health workers and allegedly without a proper physical beforehand. Some children allegedly had preexisting medical conditions that made the immunization dangerous. But these children were still inoculated, the government found.

Six Sanofi officials were also indicted for not properly helping children who had serious reactions to the shot. Sanofi disputes this and other allegations, adding in a written statement to NPR:

"We strongly disagree with the DOJ's findings made against Sanofi's officials (current and past) and we will vigorously defend them. There is no clinical evidence that any reported fatalities were causally related to vaccination.

"We diligently monitor the safety of people participating in clinical studies. We are also performing pharmacovigilance (https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/pharmvigi/en/) activities and continuously monitoring the safety profile of the vaccine in a real-world setting, including the Philippines."
Regardless of how these trials turn out, the debacle in the Philippines offers a key lesson for governments and manufacturers when it comes to approving and selling new vaccines: Slow down, says physician and bioethicist Keymanthri Moodley (http://www.sun.ac.za/english/faculty/healthsciences/cmel/Pages/Faculty.aspx). Mistakes with vaccines can erode the public's trust and have long-term consequences for the health of an entire country.
"When a vaccine goes wrong, it creates fear and anxiety in terms of the public, especially the parents," says Moodley, who directs the Centre for Medical Ethics & Law at Stellenbosch University in South Africa.

"That fear can impact negatively on the established immune programs that are actually safe and work very well."
Since the Dengvaxia controversy, the confidence in vaccines among Philippine parents has plummeted from 82% in 2015 to only 21% in 2018, a recent study found (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21645515.2018.1522468?journalCode=khvi20&). Over that same time span, the proportion of parents who strongly believe vaccines are important has fallen from 93% to 32%.

As result, vaccine coverage for childhood diseases in the Philippines, such as the measles, has dropped, WHO says (https://www.who.int/philippines/news/feature-stories/detail/questions-and-answers-on-the-measles-outbreak-in-the-philippines). And the Philippines is now facing a large measles outbreak, with more than 26,000 cases and more than 355 deaths during 2019.

Here in the U.S., the approval of the vaccine - to be used in Puerto Rico, U.S. British Virgin Islands and Guam - comes with an important restriction: Doctors must have proof of a prior dengue infection to ensure the vaccine will not pose any risks to the child. That's a safeguard Philippine families never had.

Delight

6th May 2019, 04:46

This is my rant tonight.

I referenced a Saturday Night Live video portraying Jenny Mccarthy

"Vaccinations are a personal liberty issue
Then let them go extinct"

This is quite a powerful meme. if one does not vaccinate, will one go extinct? It strikes a deep collective fear.

But what are we DOING in the name of survival? IMO we are violating a fundamental law of health... The human psyche is a modulator of health which supercedes all else. If one is well in mind, the body follows.

Maybe we cannot really live well on any level personal or collective) when the mind is sickened? IThere a numerous ways we can socially engineer sick minds.
We have all read so much about the problem from so many angles.

Regarding forced vaccination's effects, we must face the psychic implications of this barbaric act. Violence in the name of care is abuse. What is happening to people? Paul Offit himself acknowledges what happens.

AiK7IRKN9Jg

I cannot imagine anyone willingly choosing vaccination without believing in its power.
What happens when we realize how little efficacy they have?
What happens when we realize we submitted to violence for no good cause?
What if we tyhen see ourselves and loved ones injured and ill and suspect it is related?
What happens if we have an open heart and feel the hurt we subjected others to experience?

The evidence is in that all these issues are REAL.
What should we do?

What if we stop capitulating to this assault and protect our loved ones with 100% effort. IMO feeling humans MUST. Otherwise, we will be torn up by cooperating in evil... the evil of inflicting pain deliberately and for no reason.

To choose to vaccinate is different from feeling forced to be vaccinated.
Is FORCED vaccination inhumane?
Is the good it provides really tHAT good?
What if vaccines are just NO GOOD at all?

How bad does an experience have to be traumatize? How would multiple visits to a doctor's office where one is painfully and forcedly injected with substances that creates an inflammatory reaction qualify?

In contrast, a childhood disease is a gradual onset of some body response. The child is not forcedly touched with a needle in a context of being overpowered. Chronic assault is IMO one of the hidden horrors of THIS unnecessary procedure.

IMO it is traumatizing to be injected with just one needle because children have no choice when their parents force them (because THEY believe they should/must choose).

I remember being forced to have a shot at about 4 or so and I screamed and tried desperately to run away. I felt heart broken that no one could help me with my terror. I felt rage at my inability to escape. That may not be uncommon. Afterwards I always hated needles. I also became suddenly fat afterwards. I also did not have a good kindergarten experience, feeling distrustful and felt fear and worry about what could happen from strangers. No it wasn't just because of vaccination but that day in the office of the pediatrician was a lasting awful feeling. I do think it confirmed a sense of the world being scary and that I was not powerful.

This is probably why this issue of forced vaccination makes me boiling mad. I went into nursing and hated inflicting pain. When nurses were asked to submit to the flu shot, I left nursing in outrage at this mad system. Being willing to force people to agree to a NOCEBO appeared insane.

If one does not willingly ask for anything, feeling it will harm, it is a nocebo. Children feel that a needle is a nocebo because they cry and fight.

Unwittingly until awakened, parents become the instrument of a kind of abuse. If one is ignorant, one can live with that, based on beliefs that give one reassurance of the necessity. One can even live with unintended consequences.

Parents feel they must agree or believe that the good is more than the evil. To watch one's child struggle and cry is in itself traumatizing. But to acknowledge that one agreed to this in vain means cognitive dissonance.
That is IMO why parents MUST stay in denial.

“Gabor Maté, M.D., skillfully blends recent advances in biomedicine with the personal stories of his patients to provide empowering insights into how deeply developmental experiences shape our health, behavior, attitudes, and relationships. A must read.”

—Bruce Lipton, Ph.D., author of The Biology of Belief

A recurring theme in Maté’s books is the impact of a person’s childhood on their mental and physical health through neurological and psychological mechanisms, which he connects with the need for social change.
The impact of childhood adversity is noted in When the Body Says No: Understanding the Stress-Disease Connection. He notes that early experiences have a key role in shaping a person’s perceptions of the world and others, and in stress physiology, factors that affect the person’s health later on. He says that emotional patterns ingrained in childhood live in the memory of cells and the brain and appear in interpersonal interactions. He describes the impact of ‘adverse childhood experiences’ or ACEs (e.g. a child being abused, violence in the family, a jailed parent, extreme stress of poverty, a rancorous divorce, an addict parent, etc.) on how people live their lives and their risk of addiction and mental and physical illnesses, as seen in a number of U.S.-based Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) studies. Having a number of ACEs exponentially increases a person’s chances of becoming an addict later on e.g. a male child with six ACEs has a 4,600% or 46-fold increase in risk. ACEs also exponentially increase the risk of diseases e.g. cancer, high blood pressure, heart disease, etc. and also suicide and early death.

The forced vaccine shot has shown itself as a technology which agrees to "unavoidable" pain and suffering. The assault undermines the integrity of the body. The practice is a cumulative insult of trauma.

Yeah, I may be stretching a point way outside bounds.

In an enlightened world, we begin to know and own where we agreed small acts of "for your own good" torture has a place in raising our children. We learn how as adults, we are willing to subdue our neighbor's freedom in the name of "welfare". We see how we may accept this as normal life. How many shots does it take till we know that too much love of human beings has died? It is more than the shot itself, it is the AGREEMENT that we choose this route to honoring "health".

It is our loss and our stupidity that needs to addressed. It is sickening and we must choose liberty for ourselves and for those we can protect when we know. If we go along in fear and allow terror to those we love, the nocebo will kill us.

IMO but not alone in wondering how we may repent for this sin against ourselves. IMO it touches the very core of the ideal of personal liberty. IMO we have the essential right as beings to choose freely what happens to our body.

onawah

6th May 2019, 05:41

I don't think you are out of bounds at all.
I believe that vaccines have NO efficacy whatsoever.
The so-called "science" behind vaccines was flawed from the very beginning, and is nothing but an assault on the immune system.
There is no substitute for prevention.

What happens when we realize how little efficacy they have?

The forced vaccine shot has shown itself as a technology which agrees to "unavoidable" pain and suffering. The assault undermines the integrity of the body. The practice is a cumulative insult of trauma.

Yeah, I may be stretching a point way outside bounds.

IMO but not alone in wondering how we may repent for this sin against ourselves. IMO it touches the very core of the ideal of personal liberty. IMO we have the essential right as beings to choose freely what happens to our body.

Delight

6th May 2019, 17:23

I don't think you are out of bounds at all.
I believe that vaccines have NO efficacy whatsoever.
The so-called "science" behind vaccines was flawed from the very beginning, and is nothing but an assault on the immune system.

Vitamin A is apparently helpful to mitigate measles.

CDC Warns California Adults To Get New Measles Vaccine
california measles vaccine adults
POSTED BY: VAXXTER STAFF 05/04/2019 (https://vaxxter.com/cdc-warns-california-adults-to-get-new-measles-vaccine/)
The CDC is telling California adults in high-risk measles areas that they may need to get another measles shot. Two areas the CDC notes as high risks are UCLA or California State University, Los Angeles.

They claim that adults before 1957, prior to the release of the measles vaccine, likely have natural immunity. But those adults born between 1957 and 1989 may not be so fortunate. The CDC says they may have received a weaker, single dose that won’t help them today.

“Most adults are protected against measles, that’s what the science says,” Dr. Nancy Messonnier, the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said in a teleconference April 29, “including people who were born before the measles vaccine was recommended and even people who only got a single dose of measles.”

The CDC is also concerned that many adults may not have access to childhood medical records. Some adults may have received the more potent version, but the lack of medical records means they can’t validate such.
This means the CDC will begin focusing on adult vaccination efforts, starting with international travelers and those who work in the healthcare industry. Additionally, the CDC wants adults to get a measles booster shot if they live near measles outbreak areas. Of the three reported measles cases in the Sacramento area, all were from the same family that previously traveled overseas.
“Health care workers are held to a higher standard,” said Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at UC Davis Children’s Hospital. “They could potentially expose patients.”
https://vaxxter.com/cdc-warns-california-adults-to-get-new-measles-vaccine/

The gaslight is turning up

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”
― George Orwell, 1984

UK Health Secretary Wants Mandatory Vaccines, Says Anti-Vaxxers ‘Have Blood On Their Hands’
matt hancock vaccines
POSTED BY: VAXXTER STAFF 05/05/2019
(https://vaxxter.com/uk-health-secretary-wants-mandatory-vaccines-says-anti-vaxxers-have-blood-on-their-hands/)
A British parliament member is calling out those who speak against vaccines saying “they have blood on their hands.” The comments come amid fears that world governments could evoke “emergency mandatory vaccine mandates,” something the politician hints at supporting.

Matt Hancock says he “won’t rule out” compulsory vaccines. The Health Secretary, speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, said, “I do think we need to consider all options. Failure to vaccinate when there isn’t a good reason is wrong. Those people who campaign against vaccination are campaigning against science. The science is settled.”

Newly released Unicef statistics show that over half a million kids in the U.K. did not receive a measles vaccine between 2010 and 2017. Many are blaming anti-vaccine messages conveyed on social media as the culprit.

“I don’t want to have to reach the point of compulsory vaccination, but I will rule nothing out. I don’t want to reach that point and I don’t think we are near there, but there is a huge programme of work to increase the proportion of children that are vaccinated.” Hancock went on to say.

“If you don’t vaccinate your children it is not only your child that is at risk, it is also other children, including children who for medical reasons can’t be vaccinated. Vaccination is good for you, good for your child, good for your neighbour and your community.”

Hancock took an especially critical stance last month when he said, “Those who have promoted the anti-vaccination myth are morally reprehensible, deeply irresponsible and have blood on their hands.”

The war to censor social media accounts is heating up all over the world.

onawah

6th May 2019, 22:03

Cease & Desist Letter Issued to Oregon Nurses Association After Fraudulent Communications Discovered
May 4, 2019
For Immediate Release
Contact: media@oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com
Printable PDF: Download

by Oregonians for Medical Freedom
Oregon “Measles Outbreak” of 14 Cases Over but Big Pharma Interests Want Mandatory Vaccinations of Children Using False Information

"A Cease and Desist letter was issued on behalf of Oregonians for Medical Freedom to the Oregon Nurses Association (ONA), by Luke D. Miller, part of the legal counsel team for OFMF, who are still awaiting a formal response. The letter states that ONA may have engaged in unlawful activities in violation of Oregon’s Lobbying Regulation pursuant to ORS 171.764, and may also have committed certain defamatory activities such as Libel, Libel per se, and False Light.

Thursday in a press release calling out more than a dozen pieces of mis- or disinformation claims being used by proponents to lobby in favor of House Bill 3063, OFMF outlined the ONA spread of disinformation including proof of their dissemination of fraudulent email communications that had been distributed to countless contacts and ONA members publicly trying to gather support for the proposed vaccine mandate.

The ONA, one of the largest lobbying efforts pushing for the passage of HB 3063, sent their fraudulent e-mail on Tuesday, April 30th, that mislead their members stating, “this bill DOES NOT take away a parents’ rights to make decisions about their children’s healthcare—it only requires that children be vaccinated against measles in order to attend school to protect the health of other students, teachers, staff, and our community.”

The Cease and Desist letter to ONA demanded (1) for an immediate cease and desist disseminating any such false statements and/or misstatements of material fact regarding the Vaccine Mandate; (2) that ONA issues a public retraction of the April 30, 2019, e-mail communication; and (3) that ONA publicly apologizes to Oregonians for Medical Freedom and the other opponents of the Vaccine Mandate.
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/ONA-Screenshots-700.jpg
The ONA is one of the largest campaign donors to legislators who have sponsored Oregon House Bill 3063. Every single co-sponsor but one has received combined a total of $255,000 in campaign donations from the ONA. Due to an Oregon Supreme Court decision in 1997, Oregon is one of a handful of states that does not limit campaign contributions.

Amber Sims, with Oregonians for Medical Freedom said,

“the Oregon Nurses Association, an organization which lists ‘integrity’ as a core value, should apologize to legislators and the public. Oregonians across the state want to know that the people that they elect will represent their best interests, and make informed decisions with factually accurate information. When respected professional associations make misleading statements of fact, with the intent to influence votes that would benefit their interests, we hope they would take responsibility to immediately correct this false information.”

“It concerns me greatly that the association I support financially is spreading fear and inaccurate information,” said Kristy Torpey RN, BSN. “There are potentially hundreds of nurses who have children with disabilities or chose to give vaccinations on an alternative schedule. They will be heavily impacted by this legislation and have no choice but to leave the workforce. The language of this bill violates the Nurse’s Code of Ethics. It’s antithetical to all that ONA stands for and I will be submitting a request to cancel my membership due to their actions.”

“ONA caused the Fraudulent E-mail to be delivered which contains numerous false statements and/or misrepresentations of material fact regarding the Vaccine Mandate. As a result, ONA may be liable for substantial damages and/or government sanctions which, in turn, could place ONA’s tax exempt status with the IRS in jeopardy,” part of the letter reads.

The list of false statements or misrepresentations of “material fact” regarding HB 3063 included the following “most egregious” examples stated from the letter:

The ONA Fraudulent Email claims that the Vaccine Mandate “DOES NOT take away a parents’ rights to make decisions about their children’s healthcare . . .” which is patently false. The Vaccine Mandate removes specific mechanisms, such as the philosophical and religious exemptions, by which parents may opt out of certain vaccinations, substantially restricting every parent’s right to make significant decisions about their children’s healthcare. There are numerous medical reasons why a parent may choose to exercise their philosophical or religious right to opt out and/or delay certain vaccines.
Likewise, the Fraudulent E-mail claims the Vaccine Mandate “only requires that children be vaccinated against measles in order to attend school . . .” which again is patently false. The Vaccine Mandate requires students to be fully compliant with five (5) DTaP vaccines, four (4) Polio vaccines, one (1) Varicellavaccine, two (2) MMR vaccines, three (3) Hepatitis B vaccines, and two (2) Hepatitis A vaccines, as a condition to attend Oregon schools, online school-related functions, school-related sports and other school-related activities, as well as almost all state certified child care facilities. The Vaccine Mandate is far more sweeping than ONA claims.
Furthermore, the Fraudulent E-mail claims “7.5% of children in Kindergarten are unvaccinated” which again is patently false. According to OHA data, 7.5% of Oregon kindergarteners merely file an exemption form from certain vaccines—making the vast majority of the referenced 7.5% number only partially vaccinated—not unvaccinated as claimed. In reality, only 2.6% of students throughout all of K-12 education are truly unvaccinated.
Additionally, the Fraudulent E-mail claims that “No credible scientific study has ever found a link between autism and vaccines” which again is patently false. There is numerous credible scientific evidence that there is a link between vaccines and a diagnosis of autism. In a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman of John Hopkins University, the federal government’s top expert witness during a 2007 vaccine case, freely admitted that vaccinations could cause autism in some children. To claim there is no “credible” science on the matter strains credulity itself.
Finally, the Fraudulent E-mail claims that “By eliminating the non-medical exemption from school immunization law, Oregon can increase vaccination rates and save lives” which again is patently false. The Vaccine Mandate puts our most vulnerable children at risk of debilitating vaccine injury. For example, medical exemptions are extremely difficult to obtain and are not currently approved for children who qualify based on family history of seizures and autoimmune disorders, which again, are affecting our children at near epidemic rates. Without the ability to access the philosophical and religious exemptions, many children who do not meet the rigorous medical exemption criteria will be critically injured as a result of the Vaccine Mandate.
The cease and desist letter ends with, “If ONA complies with Oregonians for Medical Freedom’s demands, we will not seek to file a complaint with the Oregon Government Ethics Commission pursuant to ORS 171.125, and/or seek court intervention. However, should ONA not comply and/or continue to propagate the same or additional false statements and/or misrepresentations of material fact regarding the Vaccine Mandate, we will not limit ourselves to seek redress for ONA’s activities.”

Read the full press release at OregoniansForMedicalFreedom.com : https://www.oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com/cease-desist-letter-issued-ona-fraudulent-communications-discovered/

****************************************************************Measles Outbreak Declared Over, Yet Special Interests Drive Misinformation Spread Around Capitol
May 2, 2019
For Immediate Release
Contact: media@oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com
Printable PDF: Download

by Oregonians for Medical Freedom

While the Vancouver-area measles outbreak has been declared over, with only 14 cases in total reported to Oregon (with only four linked to the Clark Country outbreak), misinformation has been rapidly spreading throughout the Capitol and into town hall meetings as special interests spread inaccurate information to distort support for House Bill 3063.

If passed, HB 3063 would remove personal belief exemptions for vaccines currently on the recommended schedule.

The bill would ban access to any child aged six weeks through 12th grade from attending a licensed childcare facility, preschool, public, private or charter school, even if the child is missing just one of the more than 30 doses of vaccines.

Children currently on Individualized Education Plans (IEP’s) and students with disabilities, who require additional services, would also be denied free and appropriate education if not up-to-date on all vaccines.

Under HB 3063, children would also be barred from all after-school sports, extracurricular activities and per the bill language would not be allowed to be in the same space as “other individuals” which remains unclear with poorly written language for the intent of the bill.

HB 3063 would negatively impact 38,000 children and create undue hardship for families—including single and low-income households—across the state of Oregon who will be denied access to childcare and the ability to receive a public or private education with their peers and neighbors unless they comply.

Instead, families would be forced to homeschool, attend an isolating and also home-bound online public school or move out of state. For single parent households and those who are self-employed, this bill leaves little room to exercise choice and forces coercion to comply or the loss of potential income, jeopardizing housing and important expenditures to maintain stability.

Currently, there are 47 states that allow for a religious or personal belief exemption to a vaccine in addition to medical exemptions. If HB 3063 passes, Oregon would become the fourth state to eliminate all ability to make personal belief and religious choices about vaccines, leaving parents who need their child to attend school or daycare no choice unless they qualify for the very narrowly defined medical exemption.

The coercive nature of holding a child’s education hostage removes a family’s full right to free and informed consent over private medical decisions that should be made individually with their physicians. Under the -53 amendment, the American Council on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is the governing body that defines the guidelines for determining what qualifies as medical exemption parameters.

● Misinformation that there is a statewide emergency in Oregon and HB 3063 warrants an emergency clause for the “preservation of the public peace, health and safety” in order to remove access to education when real crises go on without much public notice or adequate attention:

Youth suicide rates: in 2017, 107 youth ages 10 to 24 years died by suicide in Oregon, making suicide the second leading cause of death (behind unintentional death) among youth in that age bracket.
Youth homelessness: each year, thousands of youth across Oregon are homeless and unaccompanied, struggling to survive without a safe, stable place to live. Youth homelessness is a significant problem, but, according to an Oregon Department of Human Services Homeless Youth Advisory Committee review, the issue remains largely below the radar of public concern or legislative action and has large gaps in information, resources, capacity, and political will that have contributed to this growing crisis.
Oregon lacks adequate emergency mental health care services for youth and adults. Oregon lawmakers are considering granting $3.3 million of taxpayer money to study the problem with SB 140, which appropriates all funds to the General Fund to OHA to administer and provide grants for the Emergency Department Boarding Pilot Project, with “no plans to solve it” according to an article in the Salem Reporter last week.
The grave treatment of children under state custody, which has resulted in a federal class-action lawsuit alleging that Oregon’s Department of Human Services has sent kids to homeless shelters and juvenile detention centers and failed to protect them from dangerous situations in known abusive or neglectful homes.
● Misinformation about what constitutes as a “safe” and appropriate catch-up vaccine schedule as was shared in testimony (not under oath) by Dr. Paul Cieslak of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), as exposed by investigative journalist Daniel Forbes in his article, State Vaccine Doctor Feeds Oregon Lawmakers Bunk; CDC, Experts Argue For Longer Intervals For 21 Forced Shots.

● Misinformation about the bill’s allowance for broader reasons to simply allow doctors to write Medical Exemptions under the adopted -53 Amendment that has been stated by many legislators publicly and privately as to why they would vote yes for the bill. However, the same stringent and narrow parameters still apply and do not include protections for Oregon’s most vulnerable, including for children whose families have already suffered from vaccine injury, have predisposed genetic conditions that make them more susceptible to vaccine injury, for children who hold Independent Education Plans (IEPs) or who have a disability, conditions with which doctors may wish to write medical exemptions for, but, despite Governor Kate Brown saying in a press conference held Monday afternoon with Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, “that it’s critically important for physicians and the medical community to be able to provide advice to their patients, and 3063 does not restrict that,” what Brown is not communicating with the press is that Amendment -53 ADDED burdensome steps to the current medical exemption process, placing greater difficulty, not less, on families requiring them to file annually and schools required to submit them bi-monthly. Steps one through three below are the current medical exemption steps, with -53 adding an additional four steps (*) to the process WITHOUT changing current statutes on exemptions:

Requires Doctors to write MEs based on *ACIP guidelines.
Schools to send MEs to Public Health *-53 requires every two weeks.
Public Health to review MEs and can rescind or sends to OHA for tracking.
OHA sends MEs to pertinent medical boards for ND, MD or NP. *HB 3063 requires tracking doctor now.
Medical Boards review MEs and “grant” based on reasonable interpretation to ACIP’s narrow guidelines. *Medical Boards to report to OHA.
OHA to send annual ME reports to Legislature.
HB 3063 would require families start the ME process all over again from steps 1-5 EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
Obtaining an ME will take significant resources, time and effort for families to find a doctor who is willing to write a medical exemption with the added scrutiny. The outlined process requires resources many of our most vulnerable citizens lack. Will the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) pay for the necessary screening and reimburse doctors for work associated with screening and yearly medical exemption appointments?

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/HB3063-53-NOT-FIXED-FINAL.jpg

● Misinformation that HB 3063 not impact schools financially or negatively. Wrong, this bill will create financial strain and cause students to disenroll in private schools, charter schools as well as public schools across the state. This massive drop in enrollment will cause small private schools to close, defund school budgets and teachers and staff members will lose jobs. As reported in the LA Times, the Los Angeles Unified School District enrollment dropped even more than anticipated in 2017, exacerbating existing budget problems beyond the anticipated enrollment drop of 2.1% to an actual drop of 2.55%, the same year that California Senate Bill 277—the mandatory vaccine bill that passed—went into full effect. The article reports that the small percentage difference translated into the loss of an additional 5,400 students, with the decline representing an unexpected loss of $17 million more removed from district funding.

● Disinformation: the Oregon Nurses Association (ONA), one of the largest lobbying efforts pushing for the passage of HB 3063, disseminated a fraudulent email on Tuesday, April 30th that lied their members that “this bill DOES NOT take away a parents’ rights to make decisions about their children’s healthcare—it only requires that children be vaccinated against measles in order to attend school to protect the health of other students, teachers, staff, and our community.” OFMF sent a Cease and Desist letter to ONA Thursday demanding (1) for an immediate cease and desist disseminating any such false statements and/or misstatements of material fact regarding the Vaccine Mandate; (2) that ONA issues a public retraction of the April 30, 2019, e-mail communication; and (3) that ONA publicly apologizes to Oregonians for Medical Freedom and the other opponents of the Vaccine Mandate.

FACT: House Bill 3063 would require students to be fully compliant with 5 DTaP vaccines, 4 Polio vaccines, 1 Varicella vaccine, 2 MMR vaccines, 3 Hepatitis B vaccines, and 2 Hepatitis A vaccines as a condition to attend school, online school-related functions, and school-related sports and other school-related activities.

● Missing information: OHA confirmed in a response to an April 22 press release sent from Senator Dennis Linthicum, R-Klamath Falls, that they have not conducted lab testing on measles cases in Oregon to distinguish vaccine-strain and wild-type measles infection, despite the first cases being reported months ago. Genotype lab testing measles cases is important since we’ve had at least two reported cases of children with measles in the United States this year that lab testing confirmed were vaccine-strain measles virus. If any reported cases in Oregon were vaccine-strain measles, then that means the vaccinated could be contagious and spreading measles.

● Misinformation that physicians can simply “write a note” for a medical exemption. On Sunday, Oregon mother Tkeisha Wydro posted a video clip to Twitter from Corvallis Democratic state Sen. Sara Gelser’s town hall event that included these recorded statements:

“I talked to the sponsors of the bill, that amendment will allow a physician to make that decision, they will not have to go justify that to the health authorities, local or state, that physician would make that decision. It should not be hard to find a physician who will look at the child’s needs and write a medical exemption or look at the child’s sibling had a bad reaction to a vaccine. Or children who have a medical diagnosis to not be able to get one.”

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., award-winning science journalist wrote a response to Gelser,

“Honorable Senator Gelser: you are being completely misled and you are inadvertently lying to your constituents. You wrote something that is verifiably FALSE in regards to HB 3063 amendments on Twitter and FB. ‘Question: Can a medical practitioner consider a child or a child’s sibling’s prior bad reaction to a vaccine? {to write a medical exemption} Answer: Yes. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices lists prior bad reactions of a child or a child’s sibling or family member as a precaution that may be considered by a medical practitioner.’ FALSE. This is completely wrong. ACIP does NOT consider sibling reactions to a vaccine a precaution. Nowhere does a family history of a vaccine reaction get discussed. There’s some ‘family history’ of immunosuppression or seizures, but NOTHING about a family member having a vaccine reaction as a valid contraindication. Senator Gelser, you are sadly and dangerously mistaken, which is why the amendment referencing ACIP guidelines makes what was already a bad bill even **WORSE.** If your sibling dies from a vaccine, ACIP says you still get vaccinated. What parent or physician on planet Earth would do that?”

● Misinformation about how the law would be interpreted for partially or unvaccinated siblings or peers who would “share space.” In Wednesday’s hearing at the Subcommittee on Human Services hearing Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, D-Beaverton, said it was “never meant to be interpreted that way,” however, State Rep. Cedric Hayden, R-Roseburg, points out that even Legislative Counsel testified on February 28 that it would in fact seek to prevent children who are not fully-vaccinated from attending a school choir performance, play or sports game for their fully-vaccinated siblings.

● Misinformation that vaccine injury is “rare” and “one in a million.” A 2011 Harvard Pilgrim Health study commissioned by the CDC found that less than 1% of vaccine adverse events were ever reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. VAERS data reports for Oregon in 2018 that there were 579 total adverse reactions reported including four deaths, 16 disabilities, four life-threatening reactions and 19 hospitalizations. Taking into account the Harvard Pilgrim Health study, the total number of reactions could be under reported by as much as 99%. To date, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out over $4.1 billionin settled cases for vaccine injury and death since 1988, including over $131 million to vaccine injury victims from January 1, 2019, to April 1, 2019.

● Misinformation from state Rep. Mitch Greenlick, D-Portland, that thousands of Oregon parents, educators, physicians, professionals, grandparents and citizens obtain their research from “Russian bots” for information used to make judicious choices alongside their family physicians on vaccination decisions for their children. Saying that millions of parents nationwide who do their own research and may decide to delay or forgo some vaccines are influenced by “Russian bots” is incredulous.

● Misinformation that online schooling is an appropriate replacement for traditional schooling for all students: online schools in Oregon have an average graduation rate of 48 percent for students at online charters who graduated on time in 2016. That’s nearly 30 points below a state average. Additionally, there is an existing three percent cap rate for the percentage of students per county that can attend an online school, and in many counties there is already a long waiting list for students. A 2011 report published by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes looked at eight online charter schools in Pennsylvania and found that students performed worse in reading and math than did their peers at traditional schools.

● Misinformation that legislators are listening and taking constituent concerns seriously or feel that parents should have the right to make private medical decisions together with their physicians for their families. Despite public commentary to the contrary, Rep. Tiffany Mitchell, D-Astoria, rejected flowers from vaccine injured families on March 7, when Oregonians for Medical Freedom encouraged families with vaccine injuries to go and talk to supporters of this bill and members of the House Committee on Health Care. During the work session for HB 3063 on March 14, Mitchell, in the same breath said,

“I apologize and feel bad that it’s going to be particularly burdensome for some folks, but this is about making sure that we [lawmakers] protect the health of everybody.”

● Misinformation that town halls are places where the public is welcome for all, because when mothers and fathers showed up to a town hall this past Saturday Sen. Chuck RIley, D-Hillsboro, disallowed them from speaking about HB 3063 and opened his town hall declaring that he would talk about any other issues, just not vaccines. Out of 30 people who wanted to speak about HB 3063, only three wanted to talk about issues other than the bill, the other 27 were blown off, according to Carssa Bonham and other who took to doing Facebook Live video after their direct experience of being silenced.

● Misinformation about what true informed consent really is, according to Cornell University Law’s legal definition: an agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the health care professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A health care provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In fact, OHA’s Patrick Allen and Dr. Cieslak testified against an earlier introduced Senate Bill (SB 649) “Relating to ingredients in vaccines” that would improve access to information and support patients with more complete informed consent that would have required OHA to publish all vaccine manufacturer information online and accessible from a simple QR code on a handout provided to patients.

● Misinformation that homeschooling families will not be impacted by HB 3063. This is false: homeschooling families that utilize homeschooling co-ops will not longer be able to utilize them, as co-ops are in fact declared as part of the restrictions placed in HB 3063.

● Misinformation that vaccine manufacturers can be sued: in 1986 Congress agreed to indemnify vaccine manufacturers from and against civil liability for injury or death related to a vaccine as part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).

● Misinformation that vaccine manufacturers should not be scrutinized: all four pharmaceutical companies who manufacture the 72 childhood vaccine doses are convicted felons who have collectively paid over $35 billion over the past decade in civil and criminal penalties for bribing, extorting, and lying to doctors and defrauding regulators to promote other pharmaceutical products.

Given the hypocrisy that mothers and fathers across America who hold deep concerns for a one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule for their children are painted as “misinformed,” “uneducated” or “hysterical” “anti-vaxxers” it’s hypocritical when lawmakers are not themselves seeking out additional, non-industry supplied information on such a contentious issue that has such far-reaching impacts.

“Lawmakers should never, ever vote to pass industry-written laws, especially when they are based on deliberate misinformation campaigns spread by those either complicit or even unknowingly carrying out the bidding of convicted corporatists and corrupt special interests,” said Charissa Hatten, a Bend mother who says she is outraged and disgusted with the way constituents have been shut out of the legislative process.

“Sen. Steiner Hayward and Rep. Cheri Helt represent the worst of both parties. We should be their priority, and not have our families kicked to the curb at the behest of Pharma.”

“I’m a Democrat, I’m a mom and I hate this bill. They are attacking our choice, they are waging a war on our children. I shouldn’t have to come to the Capitol and beg for my child’s life like we’re on some dystopian film,” said Suzanne Monaco, another mother who has been at the Capitol frequently to plead with proponents of the bill. “People keep saying ‘from what I’ve been told,’ or ‘the intention of the bill,’ but that’s not how we legislate. That’s like a cult. Blind acceptance of peddled disinformation. This bill has caused me to leave the Democratic Party. I changed my voter registration last week after walking out of the work session as I was so disgusted by the lack of not caring. If they genuinely cared, they would support measures for better vaccine safety, not push bills that sweep vaccine injury under the rug. There are just too many legislators who are only listening to industry-conflicted proponents and not to the will of people who actually elected them!”

“I’ve uncovered total corruption and collusion through FOIA requests and I’m disgusted. Sen. Steiner Hayward lied. Her colleagues were specifically told that the medical exemption strict guidelines were going to be amended. They were not. This is known to the public and we have emails from constituents and others who have contacted these legislators showing that they were told incorrect information and by whom. Sen. Steiner Hayward did not expand the medical exemption process, instead she’s changed the substance and created even more burdensome steps to get a medical exemption requiring it to be done annually. Her employer, OHSU is currently in the process of making their own vaccines. This legislation is a clear conflict of interest for her and we have yet to see her disclose that—we need the truth,” said children’s advocate Brittany Ruiz, who has helped save children from the state’s broken foster system. “We are being subjected to cruelty with our state lawmakers pursuing legislation not to protect people, but to protect profiteers. We must separate Pharma and state.”

Last Friday, HB 3063, with the -53 amendment was passed out from the Joint Committee on Ways and Means and will be voted on in a House Floor vote on Monday after it’s third reading. While the bill, as it is amended currently, does include the allowance for naturopathic doctors to write medical exemptions, it DOES NOT broaden the actual criteria for medical exemptions. The bill creates new sections of law which authorizes the Medical Board, Nursing Board, and Naturopathic Board to review medical exemptions, it does NOT DELETE the existing sections of law that require the local health department to provide a secondary evaluation of the records to determine compliance with section 1 of ORS 433.267. Sections 4,5,6,7 and 8 of ORS 433.2676 remain unchanged.

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/Amendment-53-Medical-Exemptions-Denied-Oregonians-for-Medical-Freedom-OFMF-8.jpg

Read the full press release at OregoniansForMedicalFreedom.com.

About Oregonians for Medical Freedom (OFMF)
Oregonians for Medical Freedom is a grassroots non-partisan organization comprised of medical professionals, educators, parents, and citizens concerned with upholding the medical ethic of informed consent for all medical procedures and practice, including vaccination. While the topic of vaccine mandates is a very sensitive and emotional issue for many, OFMF wishes to make it very clear that our organization does not and will never tolerate harassment, discrimination, or threats of violence or death towards parties who disagree with our stance, be they politicians, professionals, or citizens.

For more information about Oregonians for Medical Freedom, visit www.OregoniansforMedicalFreedom.com

Bob

6th May 2019, 22:48

I am still wondering what we are seeing in Boulder/Broomfield Colorado - it appears to be mumps like (young person 33 years of age), and the doctors in a major health center keep sending her home with in essence "aspirin" and call us in the morning if it gets worse. It's gotten worse with fluid now coming out of her ears.. WFT ?? She's been vaccinated years ago as a kid with the MMR vaccine.

The update on what's happening with this young lady.. She was being strangled by her neck's hyper inflamed lymph nodes.. (These https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324105.php are responsible for reacting to foreign proteins that the immune system recognizes as "must be eliminated" (at all costs) )

The person had the MMR vaccine. The body apparently reacted violently to the "infectious exposure" most likely to mumps (the "mumps virus" - it is an RNA virus, Rubulavirus. Rubulavirus is within the genus Paramyxovirus and is a member of the family Paramyxoviridae.

Whenever anything seems to be out-of-the-norm with medical issues, I personally take notice (I have a strong background in biochemistry).

Researching the Paramyxoviridae family - these are negative-sense single-stranded RNA viruses responsible for a number of human and animal diseases.

The Paramyxoviridae family of viruses are ripe for weaponization.

Colorado is the home of numerous biological facilities. Boulder, Fort Collins, (and formerly Rocky Mountain Arsenal a biological and chemical weapons repository now a superfund site)..

There have been odd viruses of the herbivores (bovine, deer, elk, sheep).. in Colorado and the midwest of the US - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894875/

Here are some highlights - these can be zoonotic, meaning that they can transfer from animal to human and back again and be refined in the host and back again.. (swine flu, bird flu are examples of zoonotic viruses that frequent back and forth from animals to humans and back again)..

The paramyxovirus family comprises numerous viruses that collectively have a very broad host range, infecting vertebrates from fish to mammals, with transmission primarily via the respiratory route

-- we will discuss what we know, as well as what we cannot yet predict, in terms of the factors anticipated to contribute to the likelihood of emergence of highly pathogenic zoonotic paramyxoviruses

highly pathogenic...

One receives a combo vaccine that covers some of the paramyxoviruses, and there is an immune system sensitivity then to a portion of the viral family... HOWEVER what if we are seeing some ultra-severe reactions in people because it is a different paramyxovirus that is infecting the person, something that has been either from a weaponized test, or from an animal (zoonotic) reservoir?

Possibly the zoonotic possibility can be a source for viruses, coming from the animals in our environment?

A normal reaction assuming NO contamination of the vaccine would hardly induce so a dastardly devastating inflammation of the lymph nodes threatening her life. Normal reaction that is would be a slight fever and some swelling and possibly a runny nose, a feeling of malaise and it would be over in a couple days..

BUT if there were another strain of the paramyxoviruses surfacing.. I wonder.. Considering the biological labs in Colorado and the mid-west, I would not rule out weaponization, deliberate or an accidental release - her boyfriend reported a nasty sore throat a couple days before..

What was their solution at first? Take out her adenoids and tonsils - until a more seasoned "specialist" said woah.. let's give her massive steroids to stop the inflammation reaction.. She reported almost over-night the swelling was reduced and she could breath again.. Did they deal with the infective agent that caused the lymph nodes to hyper-react?? Hardly.. The infection is still there, now being suppressed by immuno-suppressants..

This I would keep an eye on... my hunch due to the immense amount of foreign student travel to Boulder CO, is that this may be a variant of a Nipah virus - Nipah virus is a zoonotic paramyxovirus that causes severe respiratory distress. The amount of people experiencing respiratory viruses in the US is very high this year. Nipah virus, emerged in Malaysia. It can cause brain inflammation (feeling very non-functional, stupid-like or dopey, and eventually death)..

Just saying it is a vaccination reaction misses the deeper potential issues.. The vaccines can get one to become hypersensitive to other viruses which are not exactly specific to the immunizing agent... A virus in the same family could be a trigger for an immense reaction that doesn't seem to go away.. I seriously suspect we are seeing this type of reaction emerge planetwide.

Delight

7th May 2019, 01:33

This push for mandatory vaccination is all about lining up all adults for forced vaccination by removing all philosophical and religious exemptions. It will be linked to "Real ID". We won't be able to do anything without our immunization status up to date. This is paraphrasing Del Bigtree today and it is exactly what I have suspected.

If we can't stop states from passing these laws, then Del Bigtree (interview with the Lilian McDermott show) says this vaccine billion dollar per year industry will become a trillion dollar per year industry... THE MOST POWERFUL LOBBY IN THE WORLD PERIOD.

I really suggest a listen at 23:32

sEWB4qNKkSk

Delight

7th May 2019, 02:53

Last Friday, HB 3063, with the -53 amendment was passed out from the Joint Committee on Ways and Means and will be voted on in a House Floor vote on Monday after it’s third reading. While the bill, as it is amended currently, does include the allowance for naturopathic doctors to write medical exemptions, it DOES NOT broaden the actual criteria for medical exemptions. The bill creates new sections of law which authorizes the Medical Board, Nursing Board, and Naturopathic Board to review medical exemptions, it does NOT DELETE the existing sections of law that require the local health department to provide a secondary evaluation of the records to determine compliance with section 1 of ORS 433.267. Sections 4,5,6,7 and 8 of ORS 433.2676 remain unchanged.

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/Amendment-53-Medical-Exemptions-Denied-Oregonians-for-Medical-Freedom-OFMF-8.jpg

Read the full press release at OregoniansForMedicalFreedom.com.

About Oregonians for Medical Freedom (OFMF)
Oregonians for Medical Freedom is a grassroots non-partisan organization comprised of medical professionals, educators, parents, and citizens concerned with upholding the medical ethic of informed consent for all medical procedures and practice, including vaccination. While the topic of vaccine mandates is a very sensitive and emotional issue for many, OFMF wishes to make it very clear that our organization does not and will never tolerate harassment, discrimination, or threats of violence or death towards parties who disagree with our stance, be they politicians, professionals, or citizens.

For more information about Oregonians for Medical Freedom, visit www.OregoniansforMedicalFreedom.com

HB 3063 passed the house in Oregon. Now it will go to the Senate.

If any of you have followed California's tiptoe led by Richard Pan, here is his latest propaganda.

Misguided doctors and bad information are fueling the return of measles
By RICHARD PAN
MAY 07, 2019 | 12:25 PM (https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-pan-measles-exemptions-vaccinations-20190507-story.html)

Misguided doctors and bad information are fueling the return of measles
A graduate student at the University of California, Irvine roamed the campus for three days while suffering from the measles, exposing students and the facility to the highly contagious disease, authorities said on Saturday. (Dreamstime / TNS)
Before the creation of a vaccine in 1963, measles infected 3 to 4 million people a year in the United States. Nearly 50,000 measles patients each year required hospitalization, and the disease infected the brains of 1,000 and killed 400 to 500 people.

Today, we shouldn’t be seeing any cases. The vaccine is widely available to all, regardless of ability to pay for it. And yet, this year has brought a major outbreak of measles, largely because of a scientifically unfounded fear of vaccinations in some communities. Of the 764 people so far infected, the great majority were unvaccinated. California reported 40 cases, many from unvaccinated travelers returning with the infection.

In 2015, after a measles outbreak that started at Disneyland infected 117 Californians, most of them unvaccinated, the state passed SB 277 to abolish nonmedical exemptions for the vaccinations legally required for school enrollment. SB 277 raised immunization rates above 95% in the last two kindergarten classes, which may be blunting the spread of measles brought into our state. But we need further measures.

Thirty years ago, measles outbreaks were caused by insufficient access to vaccines; today they are caused by misinformation.

One problem has been that public universities have been slower to respond. The UC Regents finally adopted stricter vaccination requirements, but this year’s freshman class is the first to have been affected, which means most students came in under the old, laxer requirements. The California State University system issued a new vaccination policy in March that abolishes personal belief and religious exemptions, but again it was late in coming. As a consequence of the delayed response, hundreds of students had to be quarantined at UCLA and Cal State L.A. in response to measles exposures.

Measles is not the only vaccine-preventable disease returning. A baby died of whooping cough in Orange County last month and another died in San Bernardino the previous July. These deaths recall that in 2010, California experienced a whooping cough outbreak that infected 9,120 people and killed 10 infants too young to be vaccinated. The disease spread mainly in communities with low vaccination rates.

Community immunity, the shield that protects babies and others who cannot be vaccinated, requires that the people surrounding them at school and in their communities are vaccinated. Although the state-wide vaccination rate is improving, there are too many schools without this so-called herd immunity, because of vaccination rates below 90% and even below 50%.

Some of the blame rests with unethical doctors, who are willing to take patients’ money and grant inappropriate medical exemptions to misinformed families, thereby putting other children at risk. A Voice of San Diego investigation of medical exemptions at San Diego Unified School District showed that almost a third were issued by one doctor who advertised medical exemptions. Two other physicians who issued large numbers of medical exemptions are on probation with the Medical Board of California.

The state Legislature, of which I am a member, has an opportunity to greatly improve the situation. Senate Bill 276, sponsored by the California Medical Assn. and the California American Academy of Pediatrics, would require review by public health officials before medical exemptions from vaccination requirements are approved. It would also create a database of medical exemption requests so the state’s medical board can better investigate unethical physicians.

Thirty years ago, measles outbreaks were caused by insufficient access to vaccines; today they are caused by misinformation and fueled by doctors who should know better. The World Health Organization recently declared vaccine refusal a global health threat, noting that it has fueled measles outbreaks and deaths around the world. Last year, Europe had 83,000 confirmed cases of measles and 72 deaths. And the U.S. is now at risk of joining the failed state of Venezuela as the only country in the Americas to lose its “measles elimination” status.

But there is also cause for hope, as other states look to California’s success in limiting the spread of measles by considering legislation to abolish nonmedical exemptions. We should also keep pushing here to close loopholes and educate parents. We have the right to community immunity to keep all of us safe.

Richard Pan is a practicing pediatrician and a California state senator (D-Sacramento).

Delight

7th May 2019, 05:02

Vaccination studies don't count unless they promote the vaccine.

Danish DOX
Published on Apr 29, 2019
Peter Aaby at the Symposium about Scientific Freedom, Copenhagen, 9 March 2019.

Lecture: "WHO is the brain in the system - The sound of silence? A case study of how public health vaccinology deals with fundamental contradictions of current policy."

Anthropologist, Dr Peter Aaby is credited for the discovery of non-specific effects of vaccines, leading the World Health Organization, WHO, to change its measles vaccine programme in the early 1990s.

For almost 40 years, he has run the Bandim Health Project, a health and demographic surveillance system site that he established in Guinea-Bissau in 1978.

This lecture is part of the Symposium about Scientific Freedom and the inauguration of the Institute for Scientific Freedom, which took place in Copenhagen, Denmark, 9 March 2019.

World renowned Danish scientist Peter C Gøtzsche is the founder of the institute.

The Institute’s primary area of focus is healthcare and the institute has three main visions:

- All science should strive to be free from financial conflicts of interest.

- All science should be published as soon as possible, and made freely accessible.

- All scientific data, including study protocols, should be freely accessible, allowing others to do their own analyses.

Most of you think we know what our vaccines are doing - we don't, Peter Aaby
9 March 2019

NPNHYAevTwg

We cannot trust the Medical Industrial Complex. This one is not about vaccines per se, but about NOT QUESTIONING what is called safe and effective

Danish DOX
Published on Apr 29, 2019
Kim Witczak at the Symposium about Scientific Freedom, Copenhagen, 9 March 2019.

Lecture: "Scientific Freedom and Why It Matters - What I wish I knew then ..., Woody's perspective."

Kim Witczak is a leading national drug safety advocate In the US and speaker with over 25 years professional experience in advertising and marketing communications.

She became involved in pharmaceutical drug safety issues after the sudden death of her husband due to undisclosed drug side effect of an antidepressant.

Kim co-founded Woodymatters, a non-profit dedicated to advocating for a stronger FDA and drug safety system.

She co-created and organized the international, multi-disciplinary conference Selling Sickness: People Before Profits conference in Washington, D.C.

In 2016, she was appointed Consumer Representative on the FDA Psychopharmacologic Drug Advisory Committee and is on the Board of Directors of National Physicians Alliance and MISSD (Medication Induced Suicide Prevention in Memory of Stewart Dolin.)

She is an active member of the DC-based Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition making sure the voice of non-conflicted patients and consumers is represented in healthcare/FDA related legislative issues.

This lecture is part of the Symposium about Scientific Freedom and the inauguration of the Institute for Scientific Freedom, which took place in Copenhagen, Denmark, 9 March 2019.

World renowned Danish scientist Peter C Gøtzsche is the founder of the institute.

The Institute’s primary area of focus is healthcare and the institute has three main visions:

- All science should strive to be free from financial conflicts of interest.

- All science should be published as soon as possible, and made freely accessible.

- All scientific data, including study protocols, should be freely accessible, allowing others to do their own analyses.

We need to debunk the fake news in healthcare, Kim Witczak
9 March 2019
KSdRqvDQ8U4

Sandy123

7th May 2019, 11:29

Bernie Sanders says 'Im sensitive to the fact that there are some families who disagree but the difficulty is if I have a kid who is suffering from an illness who is subjected to a kid who walks into a room without vaccines that could kill that child and that’s wrong.”
But why be worried about the sick kid, If there kids are vaccinated why are they worried?

Bubu

7th May 2019, 18:19

The best argument the pro vaxxers have is that "There is a clear decrease in number of cases with ailments that is targeted by vaccine. Thus vaccine is effective" So I try to beat them with " there is a huge increase in ailments that is not prevalent before vaccines" So when they go about researching, the best argument of pro vaxxers is already dead on that person.

ThePythonicCow

7th May 2019, 20:43

I am still wondering what we are seeing in Boulder/Broomfield Colorado - it appears to be mumps like (young person 33 years of age), and the doctors in a major health center keep sending her home with in essence "aspirin" and call us in the morning if it gets worse. It's gotten worse with fluid now coming out of her ears.. WFT ?? She's been vaccinated years ago as a kid with the MMR vaccine.

The update on what's happening with this young lady.. She was being strangled by her neck's hyper inflamed lymph nodes..
...
A normal reaction assuming NO contamination of the vaccine would hardly induce so a dastardly devastating inflammation of the lymph nodes threatening her life. Normal reaction that is would be a slight fever and some swelling and possibly a runny nose, a feeling of malaise and it would be over in a couple days..

BUT if there were another strain of the paramyxoviruses surfacing.. I wonder..

So ... a one-two punch. The first punch, perhaps a widely distributed and injected element in a vaccine, might have little immediately obvious effect, but sets the body up to overreact to certain immune system insults. The second punch, perhaps a virus spread in a pandemic, provokes a frequently lethal cytokine immune response in those who earlier had the first punch.

The variations and combinations of such one two punches are numerous, and the ability of "public health services" to suppress wide spread awareness of such means of genocide are legend.

This reminds me of the Spanish Flu of 1918, that killed an estimated 25 million to 50 million people or more worldwide.

From Did A Vaccine Experiment on US Soliders Cause "The Spanish Flu" Epidemic? (https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/11/did-a-vaccine-experiment-on-us-soliders-cause-the-spanish-flu-epidemic.html): The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not influenza/a virus.
The pandemic was not Spanish.The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas.
From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.
From https://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/10/there-was-no-1918-spanish-flu-50-100-million-people-were-exterminated-by-vaccines-and-aspirin.html

There was no 1918 Spanish flu - 50-100 million people were exterminated by vaccines and aspirin
Mandated vaccines at the end of the war, forced on soldiers triggered lots of horrible symptoms of all kinds and lots of deaths and it was all blamed on a mysterious flu.

Vaccines and aspirin together didn't combine to make something new. Vaccines set off symptoms and death, everyone was told there was a flu pandemic, doctors and people used aspirin to try to treat whoever was sick (or scared they were sick) and aspirin is immune suppressant and led to pneumonias and death, or to overdosing with aspirin and death (the "well in the morning, dead by evening" aspect of the deaths said to be a horrifying characteristic of the mysterious virus).

From DEATH BY INFLUENZA -- CYTOKINE STORMS AND INEFFECTIVE FLU VACCINES (https://www.doctorschierling.com/blog/influenza-deaths-cytokine-storms-and-ineffective-flu-vaccines):

Duane Graveline said in an article called Flu, SARS, Ebola and Cytokine Storms. "The healthier the individual and the stronger their immune system, the more robust the response and the more damaging it is to the host. This amplified immune response was what made the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic so deadly. In common with other types of the flu, the immune response was concentrated in the lungs. The overwhelming immune response destroyed lung tissue and caused the lungs of the infected host to fill with liquid."
From by Bob (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/member.php?17746-Bob)'s October 2014 post Haemorrhagic fever / Ebola outbreaks have been reported - accident, natural or bio-weapon? -- Post #351 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?69697-Haemorrhagic-fever-Ebola-outbreaks-have-been-reported-accident-natural-or-bio-weapon&p=883682&viewfull=1#post883682):

Something like a dormant virus normally not presenting (Epstein Barr) for instance is then made active by Ebola being present in the system.. Epstein Barr would be quite able to be transmitted (by again contact from bodily fluids, i.e. coughing, sneezing), and even though Ebola-Zaire would not be being transmitted as the body hasn't fully saturated with a critical threshold level (creating massive flooding, called cytokine response), the virus IS THERE in that body and is growing to critical levels (critical meaning the immune system can't handle the load and is either shutting down or flooding)...

So CO-VIRUS activation could be happening.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana

“History doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes.” -- Mark Twain (reputedly)

Bob

7th May 2019, 21:56

So ... a one-two punch. The first punch, perhaps a widely distributed and injected element in a vaccine, might have little immediately obvious effect, but sets the body up to overreact to certain immune system insults. The second punch, perhaps a virus spread in a pandemic, provokes a frequently lethal cytokine immune response in those who earlier had the first punch.

The variations and combinations of such one two punches are numerous, and the ability of "public health services" to suppress wide spread awareness of such means of genocide are legend.

Yes - that exactly Paul has me very concerned.

Without the vaccine, the potential for a large immune response is there where the body hasn't coded it's B-Cells yet to recognize subsequent infections.

With the vaccine, the body is setup to go after the B-Cell coded protein in the pathogen, however, a variation of the invader is enough to trigger the MASSIVE cytokine (to mark cells for lysing response).. But the immune system cannot completely target the "new" invader. The flooding though creates MASSIVE inflammation responses in the body - the "body" dies by the excess inflammation and not the invader.. Without the vaccine, the massive response would not have happened most likely, and the normal course of the body dealing with an invader would have happened.

Point being the vaccine concept is in-adequate to provide broad "family spectrum" immunity responses..

Something better than vaccines then are needed. The existing "families" of viruses are too vast to be addressed by one simple vaccine derived from one "typical" virus.

==update==

I'll add a few points - normally with an immune response there are cells which will consume the targeted invaders. If the body can't completely target for consumption (digestion by white blood cells for instance) the "invader", the body will continue to flood the infective pathogen invader and edema (fluid build-up) happens. Swelling happens, but the "invader" isn't completely targeted and it remains there triggering the flooding (as was happening in my friend's lady).

A normal situation where an invader has been targeted would result in massive attack of the foreign invader, each of the cells would be marked for death, and then killed, and then consumed.. A very simple immune process, nothing mysterious there..

When some invaders though destroy the targeting mechanism, or they mask themselves in coatings that the body is made to 'think' that it is part of the body, the invader can continue to replicate itself to take over its host. When that happens the body can be severely damaged or die. AIDS for instance messes with the body's ability to recognize the foreign invader, the immune system is damaged.. No vaccine would help in an AIDS situation for instance..

-- and this is where the concern happens: with the mumps family or the measles family there can be genetic engineering, where the invader has been modified enough to "trigger" flooding (the edema swelling), but not be adequate to kill the invader. Weaponized measles or weaponized mumps or weaponized "influenza" could be extraordinarily deadly if one has been generally vaccinated to a generic version of the viruses and the modified virus reaches the population..

Is this what is happening with some "failed" vaccine reactions?

A different variant of the virus triggered the response to the immune system due to an improperly designed "vaccine", incapable of handling ALL variants of virus mutation in such and such family?

I would believe in Gulf War Syndrome the soldiers received a concoction of various potential biowarfare vaccinations - but what they were hit with, was not exactly what they were immunized against..

The result was massive inflammation of tissues and lymph nodes leading to brain and nervous system damage - not from the vaccine, but from the exposure to weaponized and modified viruses and other pathogens.. Anti-vaxers then miss the exact mechanism that is the concern. An incomplete vaccine leaves one open to hypersensitivity - antivaxers have most definitely cited what they called "auto-immune response" or a hyper-allergy reaction.. Most certainly but it is from an exposure to a CLOSE TO but not exact pathogen - the close to allows the pathogen to continually be flooded as the body tries to expel it..

The modified weapons were nasty enough to trigger a massive damaging response..

The vaccine didn't really do it (this is important to recognize) - the vaccine only setup a situation in the immune system for a potential excessive hypersensitivity - the solution by the way for Gulf War Syndrome was indeed the use of massive steroids - prednisone and prednisilone both designed to address severe inflammation and swelling (edema).

It seems to me, that the truth in Vaccinations needs to address the weaponization exposure to pathogens, what happens.. I have NEVER seen that addressed otherwise, than a simple well there may be an allergy response - that totally misses the point - incomplete immune response to a modified virus or pathogen is the point.. That needs to be addressed.

Delight

7th May 2019, 23:48

When the church of pharmaceutical mysticism must be protected, it means our ability to discover the truth has become much too powerful.

nZrQHUYwh8U

Delight

8th May 2019, 01:47

It is truly horrifying to go down this rabbit hole.

ICD 999 Patrick Jordan

"The Ultimate Vaccine Book! This book contains the most extensive Timeline proving the intention of developing vaccines as Weapons of Mass Destruction." endorsement by Dr. Rebecca Carley. Not since Edgar March Crookshank published History and Pathology of Vaccination, A Critical Inquiry, Volume 1 in 1889 has anyone compiled the unvarnished truth about vaccines as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Patrick Jordan shows how medicine developed from 6000-year old Black Magic into a pseudo- scientific application of the same superstition of Blood Sacrifice today.

It begins with an examination of kidney disease precipitated by Vaccination and expands on the total systemic destruction of all forms of connective tissue in the unique postulate of Chronic Serum Sickness as an astoundingly plausible explanation for ALL diseases in North America. Inspired by the groundbreaking work of Dr. Rebecca Carley, M.D. (www.drcarley.com) and in collaboration with veterinarian Dr. Patricia Jordan, D.V.M. (no relation) a universal view is developed of Planet-wide vaccine poisoning including humans, animals and the food supply.

The book details by what complex biological mechanisms it actually causes damage. Sound science with in-text references mixed with personal opinion and conjecture take the militarized vaccine holocaust out of the Occulted Darkness into the Brilliant Sunlight so that even the common man and woman can see the evil for what it is. Ingredients lists and extensive Timelines graphically fill out what words lack in conveying the overwhelming scope of the assault on humanity. Facts are shown so that you can see The Big Picture. The Big Picture is always lost unless seemingly unrelated historical and biological events are contrasted by historical and biological causal mechanisms. Indexed. 2012 minor revision.

Patrick Jordan | The History of Weaponized Vaccines, Militarized Medicine, & Serum - The Higherside

HighersideChats
Published on Dec 26, 2017
Patrick Jordan | The History of Weaponized Vaccines, Militarized Medicine, & Serum - The Higherside
Many of our listeners will agree that it’s loopy to consider the government and the nation of the healthcare device to sincerely maintain us wholesome. Nowhere is the controversy extra suggested than in the seasoned- and anti-vaccination debate. While the government corporations insist that vaccines are safe and effective, those who've achieved their personal studies have determined in any other case.

Today’s guest, Patrick Jordan, asserts that vaccines aren't handiest useless, but additionally risky. He says that the current nation of pressured vaccinations for kids is similar to a army vaccine holocaust, and that those injections are inflicting most important health troubles, from autism to cancer, coronary heart ailment, Alzheimer’s Disease and extra. In addition to being an impartial researcher, Patrick has written dozens of books, including ICD 999 and Continuum.

Some of the subjects that you’ll hear about on these days’s podcast encompass:

five:30: How Patrick’s personal enjoy along with his mom’s kidney ailment and serum illness led him to his research at the function of politics and faith in healthcare during the last five,000 years.

12:30: The ICD-900 collection is a sequence of codes used by healthcare companies to invoice insurance agencies for vaccine-triggered illnesses.

17:00: A list of conditions which are as a result of serum sickness from vaccines. These consist of minor illnesses like hives, malaise and fever, as well as greater excessive diseases, like heart ailment, infection of the blood vessels, and Crohn’s disorder.

33:15: Cases of well-known docs who've vaccinated their personal kids or grandchildren with new vaccines, only to purpose neurological harm, in the case of Jenner, or disorder and death, within the case of Ochsner.

forty six:40: Information on the case of a deadly disease of cowpox one hundred years after the ailment were eliminated. Edgar March Crookshank, a professor of microbiology, seemed into this, and concluded that vaccination have to in no way have came about and that it should be discontinued inside the future.

56:40: Vaccine-preventable sicknesses have been used as biological struggle. At one time, Spain inoculated kids with smallpox at once earlier than putting them on a deliver en route to South America. As deliberate, the children evolved pustules simply as they have been disembarking in the new u . s . a ., letting them unwittingly transmit smallpox to a populace who had never been uncovered to the sickness before, growing mass demise.

1:05:20: The lie of mercury-loose vaccines: There remains thimerosal (mercury) in “mercury-loose” vaccines, but it is not required to be at the labels, because it’s definitely a part of the manufacturing procedure and no longer introduced as a separate element.
BCfKjE9p7ok

Patrick Jordan

vaccinefraud
Published on Apr 30, 2019
This is one of those videos that you archive offline as a deposition for crimes against the biosphere. This is the end of the line of my 'education'. It is the beginning of yours as we raze Hell down to the bedrock to build our own new foundation as we know reality to be. This video destroys ALL of the myths of mainstream and alterNOT medicine so pay attention and watch it a couple or 22 times. 45 years of my life within the standard science education indoctrination were found to be totally wasted when I came across a single citation regarding the treatment of the most detailed outline of immune response to a disease state that showed clearly that those in control have no intention whatsoever of fixing it because they broke in the first place. Yet their 'solution' to the problem was the break the thing that let you know something was broken so that you had no idea that the first thing was broken. A simple analogy is to get the Influenza A shot so that you will be given Parkinson's on purpose. Then they will tell you that they need more tax funding to develop a VACCINE for Parkinson's. The real world equivalent is a plumber putting in your water pipes that then develop a leak. You call the plumbers to fix the leak but they tell you the leak cannot be fixed so the only solution is to turn off the water so that nothing else gets damaged from the leak. What we are tasked with is studying what little valid work out there exists in molecular biochemistry in order to discover what they did to break us, then how to fix it. Folks always want to know WHY They would do something like this. It is because they are homicidal maniacs. That's all you need to know for the motive. The reason that they will never offer a solution for the breaking of the ubiquitin/proteosome pathway is because that is what is supposed to refold proteins before they become misfolded prions. They want to harm. They live on death. The only solution to the problem is to eliminate those who broke us in the first place

DnXPBHZuzJ8

onawah

8th May 2019, 02:31

What the mainstream allophathic community did to destory Dr. Rebecca Carly's life and career was criminal. Horrifying is right!

It is truly horrifying to go down this rabbit hole.

ICD 999 Patrick Jordan

"The Ultimate Vaccine Book! This book contains the most extensive Timeline proving the intention of developing vaccines as Weapons of Mass Destruction." endorsement by Dr. Rebecca Carley. Not since Edgar March Crookshank published History and Pathology of Vaccination, A Critical Inquiry, Volume 1 in 1889 has anyone compiled the unvarnished truth about vaccines as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Patrick Jordan shows how medicine developed from 6000-year old Black Magic into a pseudo- scientific application of the same superstition of Blood Sacrifice today.

It begins with an examination of kidney disease precipitated by Vaccination and expands on the total systemic destruction of all forms of connective tissue in the unique postulate of Chronic Serum Sickness as an astoundingly plausible explanation for ALL diseases in North America. Inspired by the groundbreaking work of Dr. Rebecca Carley, M.D. (www.drcarley.com) and in collaboration with veterinarian Dr. Patricia Jordan, D.V.M. (no relation) a universal view is developed of Planet-wide vaccine poisoning including humans, animals and the food supply.

onawah

8th May 2019, 03:34

A good 9 part series being aired for free now concerning the microbiome and immune system, called Interconnected.
EPISODE 1: The Invisible Organ: The Missing Piece In Health And Longevity
Airing Here until Wednesday the 8th of May at 06:00 PM PDT: https://www.interconnectedseries.com/episode1tsa/

Interesting how this info is coming to the fore now just as the issues dealing with the dangers of vaccine is coming to such an ugly head, when obviously, the best way to stay healthy is to build on our immune systems and microbiomes naturally, instead of invading and traumatizing them with toxins via vaccines.

https://www.interconnectedseries.com/episode1tsa/

Delight

9th May 2019, 03:37

This is from 1984 and projected that measles vaccine would become even less effective every year.

THE FUTURE OF MEASLES IN HIGHLY IMMUNIZED POPULATIONS A MODELING APPROACH
DAVID L. LEVY
American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 120, Issue 1, July 1984, Pages 39–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113872
Published: 01 July 1984 Article history (https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/120/1/39/98627)

Abstract
Little is known about how an intensive measles elimination program changes the overall immune status of the population. A computer model was created to study the effect of the measles elimination program in the United States on the number of susceptibles in the population. The simulation reveals that in the prevaccine era, approximately 10.6% of the population was susceptible to measles, most of whom were children less than 10 years of age. With the institution of the measles immunization program, the proportion of susceptibles in the population fell to 3.1% from 1978 through 1981, but then began to rise by approximately 0.1% per year to reach about 10.9% in the year 2050. The susceptibles at this time were distributed evenly throughout all age groups. The model did not consider the potential effect of waning immunity. The results of this study suggest that measles elimination in the United States has been achieved by an effective immunization program aimed at young susceptibles combined with a highly, naturally immunized adult population. However, despite short-term success in eliminating the disease, long-range projections demonstrate that the proportion of susceptible in the year 2050 may be greater than in the prevaccine era. Present vaccine technology and public health policy must be altered to deal with this eventuality.

Turkish TV coverage of the response to mandatory vaccination in Oregon.

kzXPbOgaVqs

Delight

9th May 2019, 03:51

If vaccination is a time bomb according to Patrick Jordan, then it may take care of the issue of living just too long like all those "living too long" themed sci fi stories but different?

April 30, 2019 MEDICINE
Are We Living Too Long?
Medicine’s ever-increasing focus on longevity is bad for society, says a prominent physician. (But, who’d voluntarily give up those bonus years?)

Seamus O’Mahony (://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2019/04/are-we-living-too-long/)

Rolf Zinkernagel, a Swiss immunologist who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1996, believes that the lifespan of human beings has far exceeded what it was intended to be: “I would argue that we are basically built to reach 25 years of age. All the rest is luxury.” Wealthy older people spend a lot of time and money maintaining their health and postponing death. Dinner-party conversations center on colonoscopies, statins (drugs which reduce blood cholesterol), and new diets. Many Americans who are not doctors subscribe to the New England Journal of Medicine. I have noticed a similar trend in well-off, older acquaintances of mine: health, and its maintenance, has become their hobby.

All quite laudable, but let’s take this trend to its logical conclusion. What are the consequences for society if average life expectancy rises to 100 years, or even more? We face the prospect of an army of centenarians cared for by poorly paid immigrants. The children of these centenarians can expect to work well into their 70s, or even 80s. The world of work will alter drastically, with diminishing opportunities for the young.

What if powerful new therapies emerge which can slow down the aging process and postpone death? Undoubtedly it will be the rich and powerful who will avail themselves of them. Poor people in Africa, Asia, and South America will continue to struggle for simple necessities, such as food, clean water, and basic healthcare. There will be bitter debates about whether the state should fund such therapies. The old are a powerful lobby group and, compared to the young, are far more likely to vote, and thus hurt politicians at the ballot box. Politicians and policymakers mess with welfare provision for the old at their peril. The baby boomers of rich Western countries are now in their 60s and 70s and are aiming for a different kind of old age than their parents. They demand a retirement that is well-funded, active, and packed with experience. They are unfettered by mortgage debt and are the last generation to receive defined benefit pensions. The economic downturn of the last several years has only strengthened their position. They are passionate believers in the compression of morbidity.

“We are basically built to reach 25 years of age.”

But this vision of aging is wishful thinking. Many now face an old age in which the final years are spent in nursing homes. There are several societal reasons for this: increased longevity, the demise of the multi-generational extended family, and the contemporary obsession with safety. None of us wants to spend the end of our life in a nursing home; they are viewed (correctly) as places which value safety and protocol over independence and living.

What are we to do? We will not see a return of the preindustrial extended family; the future is urban, atomized, and medicalized. The bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel outraged the baby boomers with his 2014 essay for the Atlantic, “Why I Hope to Die at 75.” He attacked what he called the American immortal: “I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop. Americans may live longer than their parents, but they are likely to be more incapacitated. Does that sound very desirable? Not to me.”

Auberon Waugh (who died aged 61), son of Evelyn Waugh (who died aged 62), once remarked, “It is the duty of all good parents to die young.” Montaigne put it like this: “Make room for others, as others have made room for you.”

Charles C. Mann wrote an essay in 2005 for the Atlanticcalled “The Coming Death Shortage,” which envisaged a future “tripartite society” of “the very old and very rich on top, beta-testing each new treatment on themselves; a mass of ordinary old, forced by insurance into supremely healthy habits, kept alive by medical entitlement; and the diminishingly influential young.”

I am broadly in agreement with Mann that ever-increasing longevity is bad for society, but the problem is this: Given the opportunity of a few extra years, would I take them? Of course I would. There is an old joke: “Who wants to live to be 100? A guy who’s 99.”

Medicine has taken much of the credit, but longevity in developed countries has increased owing to a combination of factors, which include not only organized healthcare, but also improved living conditions, disease prevention, and behavioral changes, such as reductions in smoking.

Interestingly, the maximum human lifespan has remained unchanged at about 110–120 years; it is average longevity which has increased so dramatically. Where do we draw the line and call “enough”? We can’t. John Gray has eloquently argued that although scientific knowledge has increased exponentially since the Enlightenment, human irrationality remains stubbornly static. Science is driven by reason and logic, yet our use of it is frequently irrational. Does this phenomenon have any relevance to my daily work as a doctor? Well yes, it does. Irrationality pervades all aspects of medicine, from deluded, internet-addled patients and relatives, to the overuse of scans and other diagnostic procedures, to the widespread use of drugs of dubious benefit and high cost. Cancer care has been described as “a culture of medical excess.” Overuse and futile use is driven by patients, doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies. The doctor who practices sparingly and judiciously has little to gain either professionally or financially.

Many within medicine view with alarm the direction modern healthcare has taken — that spending on medicine in countries like the U.S. has passed the tipping point where it causes more harm than good. We have seen the rise in the concept of disease “awareness,” promoted, not infrequently, by pharmaceutical companies. Genetics has the potential to turn us all into patients by identifying our predisposition to various diseases. Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology on treatment of blood pressure and high cholesterol levels identified 76 percent of the entire adult population of Norway as being “at increased risk.” This ruse of “disease mongering” (driven mainly by the pharmaceutical industry) has identified the worried well, rather than the sick, as their market.

We cannot, like misers, hoard health; living uses it up. Nor should we lose it like spendthrifts. Health, like money, is not an end in itself; like money, it is a prerequisite for a decent, fulfilling life. The obsessive pursuit of health is a form of consumerism and impoverishes us not just spiritually, but also financially. Rising spending on healthcare inevitably means that we spend less on other societal needs, such as education, housing, and transport. Medicine should give up the quest to conquer nature, and retreat to a core function of providing comfort and succor.

Time to Prevent Elderly From Living Too Long?
by Wesley J. Smith, J.D., Special Consultant to the CBC on DECEMBER 4, 2013 (http://www.cbc-network.org/2013/12/time-to-prevent-elderly-from-living-too-long/)

Post image for Time to Prevent Elderly From Living Too Long?
Bioethicist Founding Father Daniel Callahan has long supported death panel health care rationing based on age. He has now weighed in against spending a lot on research to delay the aging process.

The transhumanists aren’t going to like this! From, “On Dying After Your Time:”

Even if anti-aging research could give us radically longer lives someday, though, should we even be seeking them? Regardless of what science makes possible, or what individual people want, aging is a public issue with social consequences, and these must be thought through.

Regardless of what science makes possible, or what individual people want, aging is a public issue with social consequences, and these must be thought through. Consider how dire the cost projections for Medicare already are. In 2010 more than 40 million Americans were over 65. In 2030 there will be slightly more than 72 million, and in 2050 more than 83 million. The Congressional Budget Office has projected a rise of Medicare expenditures to 5.8 percent of gross domestic product in 2038 from 3.5 percent today, a burden often declared unsustainable.

Contrary to the transhumanist eschatology, Callahan doesn’t believe that extending the length of lives will also mean extending their vitality. I tend to agree. But he doesn’t exactly practice what he preaches:

Modern medicine is very good at keeping elderly people with chronic diseases expensively alive. At 83, I’m a good example. I’m on oxygen at night for emphysema, and three years ago I needed a seven-hour emergency heart operation to save my life. Just 10 percent of the population — mainly the elderly — consumes about 80 percent of health care expenditures, primarily on expensive chronic illnesses and end-of-life costs. Historically, the longer lives that medical advances have given us have run exactly parallel to the increase in chronic illness and the explosion in costs. Can we possibly afford to live even longer — much less radically longer?

Callahan could have refused that expensive treatment. I don’t say he should have, but no one forced him to spend all that (presumably) public money on care.

He does ask a valid question, I think, about the wisdom of pouring resources into radical life-extending research (at least public money). However he also seems to assert that the elderly be somehow prevented from living longer (my emphasis):

We may properly hope that scientific advances help ensure, with ever greater reliability, that young people manage to become old people. We are not, however, obliged to help the old become indefinitely older. Indeed, our duty may be just the reverse: to let death have its day.

What does that mean? Some kind of Logan’s Run scenario?

Callahan isn’t that type. But he should have specified what he meant. As I read him, he seems to be proclaiming some kind of a moral duty of the elderly to die.

Or it could mean refusing efficacious medical care to the elderly that the younger would be able to obtain. In less genteel hands than Callahan’s, it could mean something even more insidious.

My, don’t those clouds on the horizon look dark?

Delight

9th May 2019, 03:59

This is good news

Metcalfe Informed Consent Press Conference
Published on May 3, 2019

News conference coverage of Daryl D. Metcalfe, a Pennsylvania Republican introducing House Bill 286, also known as the Informed Consent Protection Act which makes it illegal for pediatricians to “Fire” a patient or family for not following the CDC vaccination schedule. It also makes it illegal for pediatricians to “Game the System” by accepting cash kickbacks from insurance companies for vaccinating children. Source: jeffreydachmd.com

R-V2gM_M8mI

onawah

9th May 2019, 04:36

It's great news! Thanks! Very encouraging to hear truth spoken so simply and clearly.

This is good news

Metcalfe Informed Consent Press Conference
Published on May 3, 2019

News conference coverage of Daryl D. Metcalfe, a Pennsylvania Republican introducing House Bill 286, also known as the Informed Consent Protection Act which makes it illegal for pediatricians to “Fire” a patient or family for not following the CDC vaccination schedule. It also makes it illegal for pediatricians to “Game the System” by accepting cash kickbacks from insurance companies for vaccinating children. Source: jeffreydachmd.com

Delight

9th May 2019, 05:27

I am including this from 2015. It mentions several cases where vaccination has been associated with increased mortality.

No Vaccines Necessary, That's The Truth
The Wild Doc
Published on Nov 25, 2015
Are vaccines necessary? Are they safe? Are vaccines causing Autism? Are vaccines the BEST thing we can do for our children? Are unvaccinated children a risk? Are vaccinated children at risk?

ZQxwalPNxyU

video comments often have interesting details

Kissinger's "population control" agenda? Well, here ya go, in all it's 123 pages of disgusting ugliness. Seems they're achieving their goals via "injections". Interestingly, a large number of vaccines have been linked to infertility issues.
Page 4/123. World Demographic Trends
QUOTE: "Policies to reduce fertility will have their main effects on total numbers only after several decades. However, if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970's and 1980's. Moreover, programs started now to reduce birth rates will have short run advantages for developing countries in lowered demands on food, health and educational and other services and in enlarged capacity to contribute to productive investments, thus accelerating development."

National Security Study Memorandum, NSSM 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (THE KISSINGER REPORT). December 10, 1974 (https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pcaab500.pdf)
Declassified/Released on 7/3/89 under provisions of E.O. 12356 by F. Graboske, National Security Council

ThePythonicCow

9th May 2019, 05:37

This is good news

... which makes it illegal for pediatricians to “Fire” a patient or family for not following the CDC vaccination schedule ...
Were I in the market for the services of a pediatrician, I'd prefer one who disparaged the CDC vaccination schedule.

However from my present more Libertarian mind set, I do not favor laws making it illegal for a pediatrician to require, or to discourage, his patients compliance with that schedule.

If a pediatrician chooses to only take patients who comply with the CDC schedule, that should be their legal choice, in my view. If that choice is done from an informed position (at least an honest attempt at such), with the best health interests of the patients and their children foremost in mind, then that's also their moral choice, in line with the pediatrician's Hippocratic Oath.

In line with this, the state should not establish a medical monopoly controlled by pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers. Doctors who oppose vaccination should be as free as doctors who support vaccinations to practice their profession and seek patients.

The "state" has no business deciding either way whether some medical treatment should be encouraged, mandated, discouraged or prohibited. If we grant the "state" that power, then sooner or later, that power will be used against our best interests.

(Granted, I am unaware how an informed position would result in recommending any vaccines, but I cannot claim to be perfectly informed on this, or any, topic.)

Delight

9th May 2019, 06:44

The "state" has no business deciding either way whether some medical treatment should be encouraged, mandated, discouraged or prohibited. If we grant the "state" that power, then sooner or later, that power will be used against our best interests.

I agree that government has no business mandating that anyone use ANY particular treatments, but that is not what is happening.

I am fine with physicians having the right to treat whomever they want but what if it is system wide coercion?

Physicians are paid to vaccinate. Hospitals started vaccination mandates for employees in 2009 so they can get higher insurance reimbursement for demonstrating system wide "quality indicators". IMO there should be some legal obstruction of health care providers receiving money as "kick backs" for the kind of treatment recommended and then forced by coercion.

I like the idea of libertarian principles. There is the caveat in libertarian viewpoint "I am free to do anything that does not impinge on others". Now measles is said to be so dangerous that my decision to refrain form vaccination is said to impinge on others.

It is so ingrained that vaccines are super special safe specific saviors.

GiencEsBuiA

ThePythonicCow

9th May 2019, 06:51

GiencEsBuiA
John Bergman rocks !!

frankstien

9th May 2019, 18:39

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/VRAN_HorzLogo.jpg

Vaccine Choice Canada (https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/)

Latest bulletin from Vaccine Choice Canada - web version with links-
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/crm/?page=CiviCRM&q=civicrm%2Fmailing%2Fview&reset=1&id=46

Dear Members & Friends of Vaccine Choice Canada,
In this Issue:

CBC's Cross Country Checkup on Mandatory Vaccines
Citizens Address the Toronto Board of Health on Vaccines
Liberal Senate Forum on Vaccination
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/crm?page=CiviCRM&q=civicrm%2Fmailing%2Fview&reset=1&id=46

Association for Vaccine Damaged Children 1986 Queen’s Park Press Conference
World Health Organization (WHO) – Decrees From On High
No Mercy for Mothers or Their Vaccine Injured Children
Links to additional News Articles

CBC's Cross Country Checkup on Mandatory Vaccines

On Sunday, May 5th, CBC Radio’s call in talk show Cross Country Checkup featured the topic, “Should the Measles Shot be Mandatory”. We are so pleased that VCC Board member Christine Colebeck was invited to participate in a pre-taped interview. Christine was the lead guest on the program.

Christine is the mother of 5 children and recounted the tragic death of her first born healthy 3-month-old daughter within hours of getting her first vaccine, a DPT shot. Her daughter’s death was acknowledged by doctors as having been caused by the pertussis (whooping cough) portion of the vaccine and she was advised not to give pertussis vaccine to any other children in future.

Christine continued to dutifully vaccinate her children with all the other vaccines on the schedule until one of her children had a severe reaction to MMR vaccine after which she stopped vaccinating them altogether.

Christine provides insight into typical medical denial when her children developed pertussis which the doctors discounted, even though they had not received that reactive vaccine. She insisted that tests be done which proved that they did have pertussis, as did the fully vaccinated foster children who were in her care at that time.

Should the measles shot be mandatory? - includes link (https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=691&qid=) to listen to the full episode

Citizens Address the Toronto Board of Health on Vaccines

On April 8, 2019, The Toronto Board of Health had an Agenda Item “Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy“. This agenda came about after Vaccine Choice Canada’s billboards appeared in Toronto, and were eventually forced down. Simultaneously, the World Health Organization released a statement that named ‘vaccine hesitancy’ as one of the top 10 threats to global health, signaling an intensification of pro-vaccine propaganda world wide.

Four citizens addressed the Toronto Board of Health. Joel Sussmann’s presentation went viral with tens of thousands of views across social media platforms. You can view all of the presentations here.

Unfortunately the citizens’ concerns fell on deaf ears and the board passed the motion,

That the Board of Health:

1. Request the Medical Officer of Health to report to the Board of Health at its meeting on September 23, 2019 with Toronto Public Health’s strategy to address vaccine hesitancy which should include the following:

a. Investigating the potential to restrict misleading advertising regarding vaccinations on City-owned land and infrastructure;

b. Consulting with Health Canada regarding their ability to use additional regulations under their legislative authority to restrict misleading advertising regarding vaccinations;

c. Additional actions to ensure that the public has the necessary information to make informed decisions about the importance of vaccinations for the health of all members of our community, including consideration of a public education campaign; and

d. Assistance the Medical Officer of Health can provide to health care providers to ensure that they can support families in making informed vaccination decisions.
To view the Vaccine Choice Canada billboards click here.

Liberal Senate Forum on Vaccination

On April 10, 2019, the Liberal Senate Forum hosted a panel discussion on Vaccination: We know what the problem is; what are the solutions? in Ottawa, Ontario.

To view the 2 hour panel discussion and read correspondence to the Senators click here.

Apparently no one thought to invite vaccine injury victims to the table. There was no one speaking on behalf of the tens of thousands of Canadian families whose children have suffered devastating neurological and immune system injuries following vaccination. The blatant misinformation and lies uttered by the participating medical bureaucrats and key opinion leaders (KOLs) went unchallenged, with the Globe and Mail’s Andre Picard adding insult to injury against those who question vaccine safety,

"As you've heard from people there is a very small hard core of anti-vaxxers. This is a "tiny minority of intellectual and moral degenerates" ..... "they deserve to be condemned and marginalized and exposed for what they are - charlatans who are cashing in on fear."
Association for Vaccine Damaged Children 1986 Queen’s Park Press Conference

Thirty-three years ago, on April 30, 1986, Ontario families of vaccine injured children made the trek to Queen’s Park for a demonstration and press conference.

“When we realized that there were so many of us, whose children had been affected by the DPT vaccine we formed our Association both to represent our children who cannot speak for themselves and to support each other. We are deeply committed to ensure that all Canadian parents have vaccine information, which we did not have, in order that they can make responsible decisions. It’s clear through our work that no matter how immediately a child reacts to the vaccine it is simply not being acknowledged and there is no follow up to determine the degree of damage or long term effect to the child’s health. This across the board denial prevents the government and the public from having any true knowledge of the extent of damage and death that the vaccine is causing. How many children is this happening to? Nobody knows for sure.” – Edda Goldman West

To view the 1 hour press conference or read the transcript click here.

World Health Organization (WHO) – Decrees From On High

The launch of a forum with partners to discuss the future decade of immunization has ominous overtones of what is to come. It’s declaration of a “unified vision and approach for vaccines and immunization, with clear strategies and tactics that sets a new compelling country-centric vision and provides direction for the global immunization community in the coming decade”, portends a tightening of the screws on vaccine resistance and increased attacks on our most basic right – the right to bodily integrated and refusal of unwanted medical treatment.

“People must be at the centre of healthcare and their free and equal rights to essential healthcare services such as vaccinations must be observed throughout their life-course, without discrimination,” said Ms Kate Gilmore, Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations who then added this Orwellian afternote,

“There is no such thing as a right to refuse vaccines when the consequences of doing so is to be borne by others and undermine the rights of others to health, as recognized in the International Human Rights Framework.”

Unbeknownst to most is the disturbing fact that the WHO has revised the definition of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the detriment of all children. This will increase the propensity for doctors to discount vaccine reactions and injures, giving them even greater license to ignore injuries and deaths following vaccination. The new assessment algorithms weaken the possibility of determining whether a vaccination is linked to an adverse event or injury and means that an adverse event can only be related to vaccination if there is previous epidemiological evidence that such a reaction was caused by the vaccine.

As discussed in this article “the new guidelines will allow all deaths after vaccinations seen in post marketing surveillance to be classified as “coincidental” or “unclassifiable”.

Indian pediatrician and researcher, Dr. Jacob Puliyel is very worried that, “by this criteria, deaths after vaccination in children with malnutrition can all be ignored and cannot be “solely attributable to vaccine with no other factor intervening”. Furthermore says Puliyel,

"This would mean that AEFI in children with an underlying heart disease who may develop symptoms of cardiac decompensation after vaccination, the cardiac decompensation would not be considered causally related to the vaccine as before, although vaccination contributed to cardiac failure in this specific situation.”
NVIC’s Barbara Loe Fisher provides an astute analysis of the WHO+Pharma+Gates Foundation and government partnerships and what this means. She writes that they, along with internet and mass media giants,

“join together to aggressively market vaccines and promote “no exceptions” vaccine use policies endorsed by the WHO and governments. The threat to autonomy and freedom of thought and speech posed by these companies, especially in censoring online public conversations about vaccination and health, is considerable.”
No Mercy for Mothers or Their Vaccine Injured Children

NVIC’s Barbara Loe Fisher offers another astute analysis on the ‘vaccine culture wars’ battering parents who choose to make informed vaccine decisions. She writes,

“Today, parents whose children have been injured by vaccines are being demonized and discriminated against for speaking publicly about what happened to their children after vaccination.1 There is no other minority in America being subjected to public humiliation and censorship for simply speaking the truth."
What is unfolding worldwide is an orchestrated assault on the basic human right to determine what goes into our bodies and that of our children. The corporate entities that control the public health discourse on vaccination, target dissenters with propaganda techniques well known for inciting hatred and loathing of ‘the other’ by marginalizing, accusing ostracizing, shunning and disparaging those who disagree with its edicts. Our freedom of speech is denied us by the global media which ruthlessly censors all dissenting opinions. Concerned voices are silenced and not permitted to be heard. Barbara Loe Fisher writes,

“It is clear that mass media communications today is being controlled by corporations financially tied to pharmaceutical companies and influenced by powerful political institutions in society. It goes a long way to explaining why mainstream media outlets have been united in attacking parents and physicians who defend the ethical principle of informed consent, including informed consent to vaccination, and are calling for vaccine exemptions to be severely restricted or eliminated.”

Vaccine resisters have been ghettoized by the mass media with its incessant flood of loathing leveled at those who question or reject the prescribed vaccines. The barrage of hate speech is aimed at vaccine resisters who are most often the mothers living the reality of their child’s descent into vaccine injury, and chronic debilitating illnesses. It is they who bear the burden of lifelong care for the children whose health and lives have been ruined by routine ‘safe and effective’ vaccines.

When as individuals, we are no longer permitted to question a pressing health issue like ‘vaccine safety’ without the boot of the state threatening to crush our basic human right to bodily integrity, we know that as a society, we have crossed the line from democracy into tyranny.

*****

Further reading:

How Public Vaccine Policy violates Our Right to Informed Consent by Jeremy Hammond

National Emergency on Measles? Where are the Articles on Mumps? by David Brownstein MD

Libertarians for Forced Vaccinations? - No, you don't have a "right" to demand that others are vaccinated.

A Witch Hunt Against Parents of Unvaccinated Children - Measles Outbreaks: How a Witch Hunt* Against Parents of Unvaccinated Children Was Unleashed by Vera Sharav, Alliance for Human Research Protection

Paul Revere and the Impending Medical Tyranny by Charlene Bollinger

Childhood Shingles Resulting from Chickenpox Vaccination: “Rare” or Predictable? - Children's Health Defense Team

Japan Leads the Way – No Vaccine Mandates and No MMR Vaccine = Healthier Children - The Promise of Good Health; Are We Jumping Off the Cliff in the U.S.? by Kristina Kristen

Pediatrician Pleads With Doctors To End The Autism Epidemic – video with Paul Thomas MD

Vaccine Safety: Learning From the Boeing 737 MAX Disasters by Vinu Arumugham

Vaccinegate - What did the Corvelva analysis find in the Priorix Tetra measles, mumps, rubella + varicella (chickenpox) vaccine?

Those Measles Outbreaks: Thoughts out of Season by Richard Moscowitz MD

MMR Dangers Exposed by FDA Study – Del Bigtree discusses the science

Statistics Link Rise of “Vaccine Preventable” Diseases to Increased Vaccination Rates by Christina England

Open letter to Colorado Governor concerning vaccine exemptions by Robyn Charron

Citizens address Toronto Board of Health on Vaccine Safety Concerns - April 8 – Full meeting video
and Video of 4 concerned citizens.

"Anti-Vaxxer" Parents Try To Educate Editorial Cartoonist by Bretigne Shaffer

Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Gov. Researchers Confirm by Sayer Ji

New York City Mandatory Measles Vaccination Violates New York State Law - Children's Health Defense looks forward to the opportunity to have a neutral arbitrator scrutinize the legitimacy of the City's order - press release - Children’s Health Defense

Vaccines: Gateway Drugs by Design by Kristina Kristen

Measles, Measles, Everywhere by Celeste McGovern

Why these 'anti-vaxxers' are holding their ground: 'It's about fundamental rights' - Cornerstones of Freedom - IPAK Conference

NY Supreme Court Justice Halts Measles Ban in Rockland County, Calling It 'Arbitrary and Capricious'

The Fox Owns the Henhouse—When Public Safety is Governed by Private Profit

2014 study on why MMR provokes seizures in some children - Breakthrough: why MMR vaccine can give children febrile seizures

Cervical Cancer on the Rise and here at Collective Evolution

What the media doesn’t want you to know about why people choose to not vaccinate their children

MMR Vaccine May Soon Have a Competitor - 97% of children had a positive seroresponse against the 3 MMR-RIT Priorix components

The Most Important Question by Ted Kuntz

CBC attacks Health Action Network Society and Ted Kuntz

Anatomy of a science study censorship - Elsevier’s “withdrawal” of a small veterinary study breaks all the rules of scientific publishing. The biggest name in scientific literature has produced fake medical journals for Merck’s advertisers before, so yanking a study that doesn’t pass the vaccine industry’s sniff test would be nothing. Celeste McGovern looks at a case study of how Pharma is killing science. by Celeste McGovern

The risks of immune activation during pregnancy

American Academy of Pediatrics votes for mandatory vaccination

Failure to Vaccinate or Vaccine Failures? by Children’s Health Defense - “Rather than tarring and feathering individuals who, for a variety of well-founded reasons, do not vaccinate—or worse, forcing them to inject their children with vaccines that are not only ineffective but harmful—our legislators should be investigating the powerful entities that are trying to hide vaccines’ inability to deliver what they promise.”

65 Chemical Cross-Contaminants Found In Popular Children’s Vaccine INFANRIX Hexa

Testimony of a Maine Senator whose baby died 36 hours after DPT shot 32 years ago

Rebuttal to recent Danish MMR study by Brian Hooker

The Tetanus Shot – How Do We Know it Works? by Tetyana Obukhanych Ph.D

Vaccine Choice Prayer Community – A blog for people researching vaccines

No need to offer anti-vaxxers “false Balance” by Sylvia Stead – Globe & Mail

Voices for Vaccines - the purveyors of the “false balance” doctrine

Representative Bill Posey's Letter to Mark Zuckerberg (pdf)

Interview with a Retired Vaccine Researcher by Jon Rappaport - “Mark was well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.”

*****

Vaccine Choice Canada is a not-for-profit educational society dedicated to promoting health among Canadians by helping families make fully informed and voluntary choices about vaccination. Vaccine Choice Canada receives no funding from government or corporate sources and is solely supported by our members. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your children from vaccine induced injuries. Become a member of Vaccine Choice Canada and receive our internationally acclaimed newsletters. Contact us through our website, www.vaccinechoicecanada.com or email us at: info@vaccinechoicecanada.com

Vaccine Choice Canada on Twitter | Vaccine Choice Canada on Facebook

This V-Bulletin was sent to subscribers (online or at events) and members of Vaccine Choice Canada (formerly VRAN). If you received this message in error please unsubscribe at the the Unsubscribe link at the bottom of this e-mail. If you are not a subscriber and this e-mail was forwarded to you, please make that request to the person who sent this to you. If you are not a subscriber but would like to become one click here. View past issues here. To become a member of VCC click here.

To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@vaccinechoicecanada.com to your address book.

Delight

10th May 2019, 03:57

Dr Bruce Lipton: His views on Vaccinations - we’ve got it all wrong

The nature of vaccinations and the role of our immune system is a topic that is not really understood by the conventional public.It is generally accepted that controlling the immune system to create antibodies against germs or parasites that try to attack us, is successfully done by vaccines. Parents are pressured to vaccinate their children.It is accepted that we can create an immune response by taking foreign elements, bacteria, viruses, and parasites, or pieces of these elements, and putting them into a solution, and then injecting it under our skin.

This is to invoke the immune system to make a response against these invasive foreign materials or antigens.

Generally we believe that the vaccines are the way to program the immune system to protect us from environmental parasites, bacteria and viruses. Therefore we have bought into the system of artificially putting these antigens under our skin to invoke an immune response. The question of whether this is beneficial or not, is now coming into the open.

Bruce address this issue from the point of view that immunology has made a misunderstanding about something very important called the tonsils!

He says, “If you recognize the nature of infants and their behaviour you realise that infants put everything they can find and fit into their mouths. Their own fists, arms, feet, anything they find in their cot, anything you hand them they will instinctively put it into their mouths.”

This is not an accident this is nature's natural immune vaccination system. What the baby is doing is sampling the environment. Everything it can reach will inevitably end up in its mouth! By this process the infant is actually introducing antigens into the immune system and initiating an immune response.

Bruce expands on this, drawing on his extensive scientific background. He also speaks candidly about the role of the pharmaceutical companies in this.

Currently we're finding an epidemic in regard to allergic reactions or hypersensitivity. We're also finding that people are bringing in the concept that autism is seems to be associated with the widespread use of vaccines, so there are very profound questions out there as to the safety of using vaccines to create immune responses.

In infancy when we give a large amount of vaccines to the child their immune systems aren't tooled up to handle so much, especially coming from an introduction that is not normal in any sense of biology, so basically forcing the immune system to respond to these vaccinations in an abnormal way is not in the best interest of the body’s system.

It is not the way it normally deals with it, and therefore that we are beginning to find that vaccines are very likely causing many kinds of problems. What is introduced into the system is not just the foreign cells and bacteria and the viruses or pieces of the parasites that they use, but also the chemistry in which the vaccines are created, which include a lot of mercury and aluminium and a lot of other things such as formaldehyde, which are poisons.

This is an attempt to enhance the immune system, but at the same time it is essentially overpowering it with poisons and toxins.

So Bruce has come to the conclusion that if we want the best vaccine system in the world we should actually focus on creating oral vaccines in nature's original way.

7QxaG9Ng0ls

Immunology and Vaccination

U6QMYiiqXL0

Delight

10th May 2019, 05:58

Dr Kenneth Stollar of Physicians For Informed Consent is vocal about his opinions

Why Marinites are Opting out of Childhood Vaccines
Dr. Kenneth Stoller's reply to the Pacific Sun feature article "The Needle and the Damage Done" on why Marinites are opting out of childhood vaccines:

"As someone who lives in Marin County and who was trained as a pediatrician, and who was board certified for over two decades, I think I have some standing to comment on this issue.

"Why... if the measles vaccine is effective do outbreaks happen in populations of 99.7% vaccination? Where is the herd immunity so prized by vaccine advocates?

"The number of flu infections reported each year by the CDC are so super-inflated that they have become meaningless because what is actually being reported are cases of pneumonia, while mainstream media parrots CDC press releases about flu deaths in children that had other, far more serious simultaneous infections.

"Whopping cough is “back” due to herd immunity rates dropping? The truth is that pertussis is cyclical, immunity to it cannot be defined, and researchers at Johns Hopkins knew even 20 years ago that herd immunity to whooping cough could never be achieved through vaccination. In fact, recent research indicates those who get vaccinated turn into Whooping Cough Marys, because while they may not get sick if they get infected they become carriers.

"Vaccines can be effective at increasing antibody levels to certain aspects of pathological organisms, but the truth is that antibody production only tells half of the immunity story.

"Vaccination is not equal to natural infection, and even the FDA admits that aluminum adjuvant vaccines cannot produce cell-mediated immunity, which is the basis of herd immunity.

"We are told vaccines are safe but does that include developing a deadly peanut allergy, or anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis? We are told vaccines donÂ’t cause autism while the research literature reports on how to make autistic mice in the laboratory by creating a viral infection in pregnant mothers.

"Yes those same cytokines they don't want pregnant moms to have explode if they get the flu still explode if they get the mercury laced flu vaccine.

"And while on the subject of mercury, Merck admitted in 1991 they were exposing children to 87 times the toxic levels of mercury that should be eaten, and the FDA didn't intervene for almost a decade.

"But no need to be concerned about mercury anymore because amounts are now only trace in only certain vaccines.

"Trace… the deadliest non radioactive element on the planet"… it is like saying "don't worry there is only trace amounts of cyanide in this fruit punch.”

"Injected aluminum in the two-month vaccination schedule exceeds the amount of aluminum allowed intravenously by a factor of 20.

"Are we to trust that the current the vaccine schedule is safe even though the schedule has never been tested for safety - not 30 years ago, not today, not ever!

"Herd immunity is an unproven theory and while it sounds good on paper immunity is not always what vaccines create... they create antibodies to certain aspects of the organisms being vaccinated against, but not necessarily actual immunity.

"As a physician I am disgusted that vaccines are fast tracked for approval without proper safety trials. When the Government itself (via the NIH) owns patent rights to vaccine technology which they license to Pharma they are not just in bed with Pharama they have merged with Pharma, so they fast tracked the dangerous and worthless HPV vaccine that is killing children world wide (Japan just banned it from their vaccine schedule).

"Dr.Andrew Wakefield was drawn an quartered for his paper that suggested their may be a possible link between the MMR, intestinal inflammation, and neurological injury in children even though it has been replicated several times and now his partner Professor John Walker Smith was recently exonerated of all charges, proving that the allegations of fraud propagated against Dr. Wakefield were unfounded.

"There is a difference between truth and propaganda.

"Don't rely on some paid Internet troll-whore to tell you what is reality and what isnÂ’t. Don't rely on the compromised CDC, where the Infectious Disease Division has been bleed out from the inside by Pharma, and don't believe me!

"Read the package inserts for certain vaccines and you will see as one of the potential side-effects being "autism."

"The truth is out there, and that is why some of the citizens of Marin County are very, very wary of vaccines. We are tired of being experimented on for the profit of others.

"I have testified, at the request of the US Congress, to talk about some of these issues in front of the Government Reform and Oversight Committee, and do you know what I have been told behind closed doors?

"I have been told that those in the US Government who know, and that is most of the upper level administrators of the FDA and CDC and a heck of a lot of Congressman as well - they all know vaccines, and environmental toxins, such as pesticides, are the cause of the autism epidemic... THEY ALREADY KNOW... they just don't want you to know.

"Think about it." -Dr Kenneth Stoller, MDhttps://vaccine-injury.info/dr-kenneth-stoller-vaccines-cause-autism

He is now being targeted

The San Francisco city attorney is investigating whether Dr. Kenneth Stoller is handing out bogus medical exemptions.
Tracy Connor
8:01 PM ET
SPOTTY RECORDS? (https://www.thedailybeast.com/san-francisco-subpoenas-anti-vax-dr-kenneth-stollers-files)San Francisco Subpoenas Anti-Vax Dr. Kenneth Stoller’s Files

San Francisco officials have subpoenaed the medical records of an anti-vaxxer doctor to determine if he gave bogus medical exemptions to parents who didn’t want to immunize their kids.

The investigation comes as the nation grapples with a growing number of measles outbreaks fueled by vaccine skeptics and opponents who believe the shots are harmful for children despite a pile of studies showing they are safe.

“As a community, we have a responsibility to each other,” City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement Wednesday announcing the probe of Dr. Kenneth Stoller, who has promoted the debunked theory that vaccines cause autism.

“There are children who have serious medical conditions that prevent them from getting vaccinated. The scary thing is those are the kids most at risk when somebody engages in medical exemption deception. If someone uses a medical exemption they don’t qualify for and introduces unvaccinated children into that environment, the kids who legitimately can’t get a vaccine—and ultimately the general public—are the ones in real danger.”

ALARMING
It’s Terrifyingly Easy to Get Measles Vaccine Exemptions
Kaiser Health News

Stoller’s attorney, Rick Jaffe, said they had not yet received the subpoena but would be fighting it.

“He has no legal basis to make this request,” Jaffe said. “He has no evidence.”

Three years ago, California passed a strict vaccine law that prohibits children from attending school unless their immunizations are up to date and bars parents from opting out for religious or philosophical reasons.

Only a medical exemption allows an unvaccinated kid to attend a public or private school. Herrera said reasons could include an allergy to vaccine components or because a child is undergoing chemotherapy.

Jaffe acknowledged that Stoller issues exemptions based on other factors, including genetic tests such as 23andMe and family history. “He stands by the exemptions he has written,” the lawyer said.

Jaffe also said privacy of the health records is protected by law. Herrera, however, is seeking anonymized records with any information that would identify individual patients redacted.

Since the 2016 law, SB 277, was passed in the wake of a measles outbreak at Disneyland, the number of medical exemptions has quadrupled, leaving health officials suspicious that some are invalid.

There have been three measles cases reported in the Bay Area in recent months, but medical authorities fear the stage is set for a larger outbreak because of low vaccination rates and high medical exemptions at a cluster of schools.

They worry about a repeat of the outbreak sweeping through the Orthodox Jewish community in New York City, where officials say some yeshivas have flouted an emergency order to ban unvaccinated kids.

The number of measles cases nationwide hit 764 this week, the highest since the disease was deemed eradicated in 2000.

gQLLDRJdX3U

Delight

10th May 2019, 07:10

"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist."
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (https://www.azioniparallele.it/images/materiali/Totalitarianism.pdf)

Another older video approaches the broad issue of indoctrination into the Medical Industrial Complex

April Boden on Vaccines and the Medical Industrial Complex
Published on Apr 20, 2017
April Boden joins Our Interesting Times to discuss the risks of vaccines as well as the origins of the medical industrial complex and how it relates to the New World Order.
April is the mother of three children, a former podcast host and a blogger. Her son Aydan contracted autism at age one after being vaccinated.

pl4vo_teCAk

Delight

10th May 2019, 16:45

Just for fun? When conspiracy is an appropriate designation but people think that FunVax sounds like a good thing.

https://i2.wp.com/letsgeteducated.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FUNVAX-BioWeapon-Behavior-Modification-to-Accept-Your-Servitude-...Source-Pentagon.jpg?w=1280&ssl=1

Stranger and Stranger Vaccines: Are We Being Fleeced? (https://thevaccinereaction.org/2016/12/stranger-and-stranger-vaccines-are-we-being-fleeced/)
by Marco Cáceres
Published December 6, 2016 | Opinion

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a vaccine as a “biological preparation that improves immunity to a particular disease.” The WHO further states that a vaccine “typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism” and that it is “often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins or one of its surface proteins.”1

The idea is for the weakened or killed microbes to stimulate the “body’s immune system to recognize the agent as foreign, destroy it, and “remember” it, so that the immune system can more easily recognize and destroy any of these microorganisms that it later encounters.”1 That, in a nutshell, is how the process is supposed to work. Think of microbes as germs or pathogens—microorganisms that sometimes cause infections that can lead to disease.

Vaccines are specifically designed to combat diseases caused by viruses and bacteria.2 At least that has traditionally been the case. However, there is a growing tendency by the pharmaceutical industry to broaden the meaning of the word “vaccine” and use it interchangeably with medicine or drug, so that now there are all sorts of new vaccines being developed for diseases, illnesses, or conditions that have nothing to do with viruses or bacteria.

Why call something that’s not really a vaccine a vaccine? Simple. The instant a pharmaceutical company designates something to be a vaccine that company is no longer liable for any harm the product causes. In the case Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, the U.S. Supreme Court on February 22, 2011 said that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” and voted to shield pharmaceutical companies from civil “liability for harm caused by vaccines recommended and mandated by government.”3

What a sweet deal for Big Pharma. As Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) said shortly after the 2011 Supreme Court decision was handed down, “It is a drug company stockholder’s dream,” but it is a “health care consumer’s worst nightmare and a prescription for tyranny.”3

No accountability or financial liability for an entire product line. So, of course, why not expand that product line as much as possible and offer it for just about anything that ails anyone? After all, under such a risk free scenario, the only financial hazard for vaccine manufacturers is not selling enough of their products. Of course, with government mandating vaccines even the problem of poor sales is largely alleviated.

Now, it seems that every time you scan the latest headlines about vaccines, there is a new vaccine in the works for something that has absolutely nothing to do with a virus or bacteria. For example, they’re working on a vaccine for stress.4 5 6 There’s one for preventing high cholesterol.7 One to help stop cigarette smoking.8 One for obesity.9 One for sea lice.10 Oh, and one to cure homosexuality and pedophilia.11 It’s endless.

There is even, apparently, a vaccine being developed called FunVax, which is short for “Fundamentalist Vaccine,” aimed at modifying the behavior of religious fundamentalist terrorists. In a lecture presentation on FunVax published as a video on YouTube last year (click here), the speaker states:

So, our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have overexpression of the VMAT2 gene and that, by vaccinating them against this, we’ll eliminate this behavior.12

So we’re going to be vaccinating to manipulate certain genes and behaviors? Mind control?

Back in the 1970s, U.S. Senator William Proxmire of Wisconsin came up with the idea of giving an award to government officials for wasting public money. It was kind of a booby prize for public projects that just seemed to defy common sense. It was a clever way to help uncover wasteful government spending. Sen. Proxmire called it the Order of the Golden Fleece, and from 1975 to 1988 he awarded the Golden Fleece 168 times.13

Perhaps the time has come to revive Sen. Proxmire’s initiative and offer up our own modified version of the Golden Fleece. (Yes, I know… fleece, sheep… I get it.) Our award would be for the strangest vaccines in the pipeline—the ones that might make the average person stop and wonder, “Are they serious?” I’ve already cited a few candidates currently in the running for the first TVR Golden Fleece award. I would gladly welcome additional suggestions.

Leaked Pentagon Video Shows Vaccine Designed to ~ Modify Behavior ~

Comment from video

Whether this video is a hoax or not is not the point - because this is being done and has been for at least a few decades now. Read the US Supreme Court decision CIA v Sims, 471 U.S. 159 (1985). People thought for a long time that MKULTRA was just a "conspiracy theory", until this case came to general knowledge. Aerosol spraying of biological IS being done, along with the aluminum and barium nanoparticlulates. Video evidence has been posted on many sites, as has been the lab results. Morgellon's disease is no longer being pooh-pooh'd by doctors. This video is included in another post related to Assange (titled "Julian Assange's last word's "Intelligent Evil Dust, it's everywhere in everything" cut off air.") - the argument being given at one point in the post by those who advocate using aerosol spraying to control global warming is fallacious, because we CAN'T do it at the height they suggest. The proposal was that it be done in the stratosphere.

Problem is, we CAN'T do "stratospheric" aerosol injection - at least with jet aircraft - because THEY CAN'T FLY THERE. In fact, the research points out that what will happen will be exactly what you're saying about it - it will literally heat up the atmosphere and Earth instead of cooling it. So why are they spraying IN the troposphere? I think it's obvious. I witnessed the fall of organic material (I was a biomedical research tech many years ago) from the sky in No AZ back in '85. Long white twisted threads (looked like what is called a tertiary structure) of material which clumped up and turned to a gel on plants, the ground and a car. It ate holes in the car paint! Spider webs (which is what most people thought they were) do not eat holes in a hard enamel paint surface. It happened again in Las Vegas around 1996 - and did the same thing to a whole parking lot of cars. I've been telling people about this for 33 years (and have been called all kinds of things for it), but it wasn't until Cliff Carnicom started his website, then Dane Wigington, before people began paying attention.

Look up the Centibot program at Stanford Research Institute. Then imagine that technology reduced to nanobot size.

Also, I've seen this Pentagon presentation many years ago. What I did NOT notice until now is that those brain scans seem to be of the SAME brain - and NOT two different individuals. Look at them closely. They have what appears to be exactly the same folds and fissures in the same places, the same bony ridges, the same irregularities in the skull. Looks like the guy was pulling the wool over these officer's eyes to get them to approve funding for the program. Thing is, they were probably already doing it - because in MY experience in research, both with university and DoD contractors, that's what goes on. The SDI program, popularly known as "Star Wars", was already up in space and operational BEFORE Reagan started stumping for funding of it back in the 80's. I know that because a grad student at a university where I worked told me about having worked at Hughes on communication lasers which were used on the space-based weapons systems that were ALREADY up there in orbit - back in 1982.

From my experience in both industrial/Dod and university research, what we are told, and what we see in films and on TV, is AT LEAST 7 years and more often 15 - 30 years behind what the military is already doing. We're just being psychologically prepped to accept the ideas in movies and advertising over that time frame. So if this video is really from '05 and "leaked" in 2011 (or earlier), you can bet they already had the program up and running long before then and this is just admitting to it after the fact.

-gfTqfVeLHw

Vmat2, FunVax Vaccine and Adrenochrome - a tentative investigation (https://www.slideshare.net/uniquelee/vmat2-funvax-vaccine-and-adrenochrome-a-tentative-investigation)

Interview With Joey Lambardi About The Fundamentalism Vaccine (FunVax)
Posted on April 25, 2011 (https://funvax.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/interview-with-joey-lambardi-about-the-fundamentalism-vaccine-funvax/)

Delight

11th May 2019, 01:20

"If you can't win the debate, don't have it...."

B59CBW6cc3o

What Really Happened In Connecticut? Yale Bailed & Vaccine Knowledge Censorship Continues (https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/03/what-really-happened-in-connecticut-yale-bailed-vaccine-knowledge-censorship-continues.html)

Religious and parental rights have been under siege in Connecticut since the 2019 legislative session began. Parents, doctors, chiropractors, clergy, independent journalists and other concerned citizens have been attending and testifying at the Capitol since early February to fight pending legislation that seeks to eliminate religious exemptions for unvaccinated or under-vaccinated children from attending public school. According to the progressives in Hartford, the “measles is a deadly outbreak,” and our vaccine-free and symptom-free children are a “public threat.”

Since Representative Josh Elliott (D) was one of several Connecticut legislators pushing bills to mandate vaccinations and remove religious exemptions, LeeAnn Ducat founder of Informed Choice USA, pushed for Elliott to host a public forum to discuss and debate the safety of vaccines. Yale doctors were invited by Elliott, who attempted to stack the deck with those that believed the “science is settled.” Ducat asked Robert F Kennedy, Jr. to participate along with a board-certified nephrologist, a neurologist, a pediatrician, and a research scientist. After weeks of negotiation, Yale only agreed to allow Robert Kennedy, Jr. to join the panel in an attempt to refute his claims, with each panelist promised only 5 minutes. Finally, less than two weeks in advance, The Science of Vaccines Forum was announced for Tuesday, March 19th from 9am-11am with 90 minutes of Q&A from the public. The Yale panelists were Dr. Brett Lindenbach, Dr. Sandra Carbonaro, MD, Dr. Gene Shapiro, Dr. Linda Niccolai.

On Wednesday, March 12, Representative Josh Elliott (D), Representative Liz Linehan (D) and House Majority Leader Matt Ritter (D) held a press conference at the capital to discuss the importance of vaccine mandates and went as far as banning the hundreds of moms and dads from attending and shut the doors on the public. It was a pharma puppet show.

On Friday, March 14, it was announced that after the vaccine forum, Kennedy would hold a bipartisan press conference with Representative Anne Dauphinais (R) and Representative Jack Hennessy(D) about the complex issue of vaccine mandates from 12-2pm.

Despite their 5 to 1 advantage, in the dead of night, Yale Bailed!

An email was sent from Josh Elliott to Kennedy and Ducat at 11:06 pm the night before.

“A number of doctors dropped out an hour ago, and our forum will have to be canceled. I’m very sorry for this and pushed them to reconsider. Wasn’t happening.” -Josh Elliott

On his Facebook news feed, however, he says, “First thing, Yale did not bail. I decided to cancel the forum.” Ducat replied, “Kennedy flew 3,000 miles to get here, Yale doctors couldn’t drive 30 minutes, and Josh Elliott couldn’t even make it down the escalator to shake Kennedy’s hand. How rude.”

The press conference and presentation went along as planned, and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. educated the public, legislators and the media. He clearly explained (with proof) the regulatory capture of our governmental agencies by the pharmaceutical industry. Kennedy outlined the complete government failure of all the regulatory agencies including the CDC. He told how manipulation, corruption, distortion, and suppression of scientific information had threatened vaccine science for years. He discussed how these corporations influence the use of science in legislative decision making to serve their own trillion dollar interests.

“The last thing standing between a greedy industry and a vulnerable child is the mom.

- Robert F Kennedy, Jr.

Kennedy explained at length the dangerous side effects of vaccines and how truth is covered up by the pharma companies to protect their profits, stating “They all have the same story. They had a perfectly healthy child. They believed strongly in vaccines. They took their child to get vaccinated, and the vaccine injured their child. They know what happened to their children. We need vaccines to go through the same rigorous safety testing as other medication, and we need inert placebo vaccine studies.”

Kennedy also spoke about censorship, calling out Amazon, Pinterest, Facebook, and others. He states that Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter will not censor and encouraged all to reach out to him to give thanks.

He referenced how the mainstream press has been complicit in massive deceit campaigns dating back to the Vietnam War, and how they protected the Catholic Church during the pedophile scandal. Even after Kennedy’s damning PowerPoint presentation, and calling out the press, it quickly became clear nothing has changed. From the poorly written and slanted bias of articles written by local news outlets, it was apparent that the journalists were not listening to the information, including multiple verified sources cited by Kennedy. Not one article published from the mainstream news platform was objective. It can only come from cognitive dissonance, willful ignorance or they were coached on how to respond. One even went as far as to write about Kennedy’s voice condition to try to paint him as weak and discredit him.

“Democracy does not function if you don’t have free speech and free debate.”

- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Delight

12th May 2019, 01:35

the corrupt power structure at work....

NY considers banning all non-medical exemptions for vaccinations (http://hudsonvalley.news12.com/story/40428014/ny-considers-banning-all-nonmedical-exemptions-for-vaccinations)
Posted: May 07, 2019 6:06 AM EDT

NY considers banning all non-medical exemptions for vaccinations
ALBANY -
A bitter battle continues in Albany today over a parent's right to decide if their children should be vaccinated.

One of the state's top medical groups is supporting a bill that would ban all non-medical exemptions to protect public health and combat the measles outbreak.

The Medical Society of the State of New York has joined Rockland County Executive Ed Day and Sen. David Carlucci (D), who are also strong advocates of the bill.

But the proposal faces fierce opposition from people for vaccine rights. "There's numerous religious groups that do not vaccinate for religious reasons. It is a fundamental violation of our most precious right and that's our right to believe in whatever god we choose to believe in and worship the way we see fit," says Rita Palmer.

Listen to Rita Palmer here at 20:10. I think anyone who is concerned about the play book being rolled out for all states, should listen here as she touches on all the salient points.

y2Hx1YAwEJg

Delight

12th May 2019, 03:35

I know Alan Phillips. IMO he is kind, generous,intelligent and acts from the highest motivation to help others. He is an attorney who advises people regarding how to navigate legal issues around vaccinations. Now he has been jailed for refusing to turn over his client files. Stephanie Stock reports on what we may do to support him at 1:09:47.

y2Hx1YAwEJg

She also brings up the need for all groups who value the Constitution and civil liberties to join together. IMO and I am not alone in thinking, the drive to force vaccination is not an isolated move but is like a test of how willing people are to accept giving up basic rights for a perception of safety.

Anyone who actually researches the issues facing those who prefer to use natural healing methods and reject the Medical Industrial Complex knows. There has been an overt suppression of those who challenge but NOW, using mind control to frighten and buying the politicians of all persuasion, the stakes are high.

When we have no control over the body itself, we CERTAINLY will have no right to control any other aspect of life. When we have choice, IMO we have a chance.

Delight

12th May 2019, 04:59

This video came out in 2012.

-aHRMjVHggI

This in 2011

7hITYIT02rA

ThePythonicCow

12th May 2019, 05:44

This video came out in 2012.
Here's a brief description of the first video above, from https://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/the-exploding-autoimmune-epidemic-dr-tent/

================

The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic – Dr. Tent

(YouTube) Diverse Health Services presents Dr. Tent’s April 2012 two-hour lecture; The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic. Dr. Tent highlights the hypocrisy contained within the mainstream medical establishment, as well as the massive amount of corruption as health care and politics intermingles at an ever greater rate. He thoroughly covers the history of cancer, viruses, autoimmune diseases, vaccines, human experimentation, bioweapons and more.
================

This in 2011
Here's a brief description of the second video above, from https://www.learntherisk.org/videos/lethal-injection-the-story-of-vaccination/

================

Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.================

Delight

12th May 2019, 06:17

Informed consent when it means access to scientific information is a great threat to vaccine acceptance.

Dr. Mateja Cernic got her PhD in sociology in 2014 at the School of Advanced Social Studies - SASS (Slovenia, EU). Since 2011, she has worked at the same faculty as an Assistant Lecturer covering various subjects. Her main research interests lie in the areas of power, control, ideologies and discourses in everyday life and medicine. She first became interested in the topic of vaccination around 10 years ago – many years before the birth of her first child and without any previous personal negative experience.

Mateja Cernic: We are expected to blindly believe in miraculous and comprehensive efficiency of vaccination
INTERVIEW
author Jure Batagel (https://www.valeriekchm.com/english/2018/2/27/mateja-cernic-we-are-expected-to-blindly-believe-in-miraculous-and-comprehensive-efficiency-of-vaccination-1)

Mateja Cernic, PhD, is the author of the scientific monograph Ideological Constructs of Vaccination, a systematic and detailed analyse of the regular myths of vaccination. Cernic received a doctorate degree at the Faculty for Applied Social Studies. Her research work consists mainly of topics on social power and ideologies and discourses in the field of medicine and everyday life.

For several years, you have been pointing out to the Slovenian public that the studies based on which vaccines obtain authorisations for sale are protected as trade secret. What does that say about the attitude towards public health?

Indeed, since 2013, I have been fighting with ARSZMP – the Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Medicines and Medical Devices, for public availability of safety and efficiency studies, based on which ARSZMP grants authorisations for sale to individual vaccines. We should point out that no one (with the exception of ARSZMP employees) has access to those studies. They are not available to the general public nor to the specialised public. Doctors are not concerned with this – doctors as individuals nor doctors as professionals have never (or at least not until 2013, when I made this initiative) demanded access to these studies. Furthermore, they never questioned the legislation which allows the safety and efficiency studies submitted in the procedure of medicine registration to be kept as trade secret.

We should point out that no one (with the exception of ARSZMP employees) has access to those studies.
This has gone to court for the second time now, and the arguments used by ARSZMP are unbelievable. They believe that disclosing studies on safety and efficiency of vaccines would lead to “wrong” interpretations, which would contribute to large-scale rejection of vaccination. Further arguments state that disclosure of these information would cause significant damage, that manufacturers would leave the market, that individual manufacturers would be less competitive, etc.

ARSZMP is consistently working as a fierce advocate of the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and not as guardian of public health as stated in our legislation. At the same time, the Agency is vigorously defending itself – studies based on which vaccines obtain authorisations for sale (here and abroad) are methodological smears. The manner in which they are designed does not enable a realistic evaluation of short-term, let alone long-term effects of vaccines.

At the same time, the Agency is vigorously defending itself – studies based on which vaccines obtain authorisations for sale (here and abroad) are methodological smears.
The fight to gain access to these studies resembles a total farce, as the arguments presented by ARSZMP are truly unbelievable (they are presented in more detail in my book Ideological Constructs of Vaccination). However, the most shocking of them comes from the current Information Commissioner Mojca Prelesnik (the IC is also involved in a judicial procedure). In response to my note, in which I proved the methodological unsuitability of studies among other things, she stated the following (dated 14th November 2016): “In the continuation, the plaintiff states that an even more pressing issue is the fact that these studies are “methodological smears”. If made public, what added value in “informing the public on public health” would these studies provide if, according to the plaintiff, they lack sufficient expertise. (...). If subjected to assessment, would these studies contribute to responsible decision-making on vaccination of children, which is in the public interest?”

In short, the Information Commissioner believes that if the studies are unprofessional, it is best to keep them unavailable for the public. Do I need to say anything else?

ARSZMP is consistently working as a fierce advocate of the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and not as guardian of public health.
Is this kind of data confidentiality acceptable for a democratic society?

Absolutely not. People have the right to know what medicines and vaccines contain and how their safety and efficiency were tested. As well as how well – or badly – the national institutions responsible for protecting public health are doing their job. Public availability of safety and efficiency studies is a fundamental prerequisite for transparency and actual public health protection. At this point, we should also point the finger at the doctors, who are, as mentioned, not concerned over the fact that they only have access to a summary of product characteristics (SmPC), which in no way allows them to assess the adequacy of a vaccine or medicine for an individual patient. Studies, published in scientific publications (which are of course available to doctors and others), are not a sufficient replacement for studies, based on which the authorisations for sale are granted.

ARSZMP is consistently working as a fierce advocate of the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and not as guardian of public health.

Ideological Constructs of Vaccination.jpg
Do they even perform long-term monitoring of vaccinated children to determine potential long-term health consequences?

No, they do not. Most studies on safety and efficiency of vaccines are designed to monitor (just monitor, excluding any examinations, except for measuring the temperature) side effects only 5-30 days after receiving the dose. And that is all. Based on these 5 to 30 days of monitoring the vaccine is then declared as safe. Even more than that, the American Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) stated the following: “Long-term monitoring of vaccinated children to search for long-term health consequences would be impractical and unethical, as it would deprive other children of vaccines, which would be used to perform long-term studies."

But clearly, it is perfectly ethical to vaccinate millions of children with vaccines, whose safety and efficiency have never been adequately tested. By the way, the passive systems for recording side effects are also useless, as they only record a few permilles to percents of the anticipated level of side effects. All this is analysed in detail and supported with adequate sources in my book.

In Germany, they have many measles epidemics, but vaccination remains voluntary. Does that reflect the higher quality of their medical system?

Germans understand, probably also because of their experience with Nazism, that the absolute right to decide on one’s own body is one of the fundamental and sacred human rights that should never be violated. It is also clear to them (and after the Nuremberg Trials it should be clear to all of us) that no medical procedure should ever be performed without a voluntary and informed patient’s consent. As to the actual healthcare system, German doctors may in addition to allopathic medicine legally and with no problems perform alternative medicine, such as homeopathy, acupuncture, etc., which contributes to a higher quality of the system. Here, the situation is frankly absurd, as the doctor who starts practising homeopathy immediately loses their licence, even though the legislation states that homeopathy should only be performed by doctors. They regain their licence only if they quit practising homeopathy and “return to the old ways”.

Are doctors who are critical to vaccines discredited? For example, the arguments of Andrew Wakefield, who disclosed the connection between the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, and rubella) and autism, are being debunked in several ways?

Yes. Most of those who in any way doubt the vaccines, or even dare to criticise them, are faced with harsh formal and informal sanctions, discrediting attempts, threats to end their careers, lies, etc. What happened to A. Wakefield (no, his research was not false) is one of the saddest and most embarrassing stories of our time.

But the operation of the system and the pressure imposed to all “heretics” (i.e. critics of vaccines) are best reflected in the case of the Austrian doctor Johann Loibner. Dr. Loibner, who is also a court expert for post vaccination injuries, had his licence removed for issuing public warnings against vaccination. He organised professional symposiums, at which he educated doctors on vaccination. He, along with many other critical doctors, was reported to the Medical Chamber and after refusing to comply and end his lectures on vaccines, the Austrian government took away his licence in 2009. In an interview for Natural Immunity (Naravna Imunost), Dr. Loibner stated the following: “They have permanently erased me from the list of doctors. Following my complaint to the Supreme Court, the court has after four years withdrawn the explicit prohibition. There was another doctor that was in a similar situation, but in her case, it was a conditional prohibition. Meaning that she would lose her licence if she ever discussed vaccination anywhere in public. Thanks to this judgement of the Supreme Court this cannot happen to her. (...) With this claim to the Supreme Court we ensured that doctors may publicly state their opinions on vaccination!”

We often hear the term “anti-vaccinators”, but is this an adequate term for a group of people who advocates for voluntary vaccination?

That depends on how we interpret the term “anti-vaccinators”. The media is trying very hard to attribute to this term as many negative connotations as possible. Anti-vaccinators are presented as selfish, blinded, uneducated, and irrational fanatics, which of course is a complete nonsense and intentional manipulation. An even more serious manipulation is when the media tries to show anti-vaccinators as people “who want to ban vaccines”. This is a vile lie, used to turn the masses against those criticising vaccines. Anti-vaccinators are in no way trying to “ban vaccines”, but rather strive for freedom to decide if an individual will get vaccinated or not. We fight for the personal and healthcare freedom of everyone as opposed to the rule of one pole over the other. That is significantly different. In response to the media manipulations, some of the anti-vaccinators now call themselves “freevaxers”, which may or may not be a more appropriate term, depending on how we interpret the two terms.

Mass media tends to view criticism of vaccines as conspiracy theories. Why do they react differently when it comes to the disclosures such as the ones of Snowden or Assange?

Vaccination is the holy grail. It is actually the holiest grail of our time. You can doubt anything, you can criticise everything, but as soon as you say anything against vaccines, you are burned at the stake. This on its own is telling enough.

If there is no public debate on vaccination, are we not forced to just believe in the efficiency of vaccines? Can we even call that science? Recently, you have posted on your Facebook page that your comments were deleted from the page of the Slovenian Ministry of Health?

Yes, we are expected to blindly believe in miraculous and comprehensive efficiency of vaccination There are virtually no public debates with substantive arguments and counterarguments. The provaccination party (including doctors and institutions) usually counters the arguments of the anti-vaccination party with censorship and attempts of personal discreditation, avoiding actual substantive counterarguments. An example of this strategy is also the mentioned censorship that the Ministry of Health performed on their page. It is very telling that they chose to erase the comments (mine and of others) which contained specific arguments, numbers, sources, etc.

Vaccine Safety and Efficacy Studies That are the Bases for Marketing Authorizations are a Complete Methodological Mess
Posted on: Wednesday, October 3rd 2018 at 3:00 am
Written By: Mateja Cernic (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-safety-and-efficacy-studies-are-bases-marketing-authorizations-are-comple)

"Vaccines are held to the highest standard of safety. The United States currently has the safest, most effective vaccine supply in history. Vaccines undergo a rigorous and extensive evaluation program to determine safety and effectiveness." (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.vaccines.gov/basics/safety/informed/. accessed on 28 January 2017)

Claims that vaccines “undergo rigorous and extensive testing”, that they are “held to the highest standard of safety”, etc., are lies. The sad truth is exactly the opposite. The studies that are the bases for marketing authorizations are a complete and utter methodological mess. They are designed so very badly that they do not allow the detection and evaluation of short-term, let alone long-term vaccination effects. Such methodologically so inadequate studies should never be part of the process of granting marketing authorizations. I have to emphasize here that the mass utilization of untested vaccines, i.e. vaccines that haven't been reliably tested, isn't rare. On the contrary, granting a marketing authorization to vaccines without methodologically sound studies of safety and efficacy is a rule, not an exception.

"The design of a study, the procedures used and the very execution of a project are the elements which determine to a great extent the quality of scientific work and the (in)validity of its results. Poor research design and methodology lead to lack of credibility of findings and, in case of medicinal products, to a potentially erroneous evaluation of efficiency, safety and profitability of the pharmaceutical preparation. The entire scientific research process, from planning to publication, is subject to a string of identified and well described mistakes, distortions and partiality. The latter can be an unintended consequence of poor mastering of the research process or lack of experience. Proneness to error, which is intrinsic to scientific work, also opens the door to deliberate and well thought exploitation of this possibility with the intention to manipulate" (Gajski 2009, p. 66).

If we summarize all that is wrong with the majority of safety and immunogenicity studies, including the ones submitted in the process of gaining a marketing approval, we get a truly chilling picture: instead of rigorous scientific studies in the true sense of the word, we have studies that are methodological mess. Studies that are, obviously intentionally[1], designed so poorly that they would be barely fit for a college assignment, if that. They are designed in such a way that they cannot reveal the actual safety and efficacy profile of individual vaccine, they do not allow for any reliable and correct evaluation of vaccines. Consequently, despite claims about “rigorous scientific studies”, millions of children are routinely injected with untested vaccines whose true safety and efficacy profiles remain largely unknown.

Below I briefly summarized the most common and typical methodological “flaws”.

1. Preclinical safety studies are often not done. And if they are done, they are so poorly designed and limited in their scope, that they are almost useless. However, preclinical (animal)[2] studies are of immense importance; they are the only way to truly research vaccines' side effects and should form an integral and unavoidable part of any registration process.

It is true that animal studies have their own set of problems (for example, it is often difficult to find an adequate animal model, results cannot be 100% applied to humans, etc.) but they do allow:

invasive and frequent examinations and tests,
autopsy,
longitudinal studies (over 3 generations or more).
Those are the three most important aspects. Researchers should sincerely and actively search for all kinds of side effects, including theoretical/hypothetical ones. Instead, they are actively shutting their eyes and looking the other way. Many injuries, abnormalities, pathologies, etc. can only be revealed by a proper autopsy, so this should form an integral part of every study. And in many instances, with each passing generation, effects (both good and bad) of certain substance become more pronounced, wider in scope and higher in intensity. To discover the true range of possible side effects, one has to look not only for long term effects as such (for example, effects that become apparent in few months or years), but also research how it would affect the third, fourth, fifth generation[3].

2. Pharmacokinetic studies are not required for vaccines. They aren't required for any vaccine component, not even for adjuvants (EMA, 17 May 2005, p. 4; WHO, 17–21 November 2003, p. 14). Consequently, such studies – i.e. studies of the time course of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion – aren't done. In other words, vaccines are granted a marketing authorization without a single study about how their components act in the body, how are they absorbed, how and where are they transported, how they affect various organs, where are they deposited, how are they excreted, etc.

Of course, the lack of preclinical safety studies and pharmacokinetic studies is not the only problem. Tomljenovic and Shaw (2011a, 2630) stated that “to the best of our knowledge, no adequate studies have been conducted to assess the safety of simultaneous administration of different vaccines to young children. Another issue of concern is the lack of any toxicological evaluation about concomitant administration of aluminum with other known toxic compounds which are routine constituents of commercial vaccine preparations, e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde. In spite of all this, aluminum adjuvants are generally regarded as safe and some researchers have even recommended that no further research efforts should be spent on this topic despite a lack of good-quality evidence [...] to the best of our knowledge, no adequate clinical studies have been conducted to establish the safety of concomitant administration of two experimentally-established neurotoxins, aluminum and mercury, the latter in the form of ethyl mercury (thimerosal) in infants and children".

3. Observation period is extremely short, often only 5–15 days after each vaccine dose and rarely more than 30 days. Such study cannot detect any medium- and long-term side effects. On the basis of a few weeks' observation, vaccines are declared “safe” and pumped into millions of children worldwide.

4. Placebo (saline solution) is practically never used. Instead either an older version of a vaccine, a vaccine from different manufacturer or a vaccine's solution without antigens (but with all the other substances, including aluminum) plays a role of “placebo.” Such studies are then shamelessly and manipulatively called “placebo-controlled.” All this despite the fact that adjuvants cause a large percentage of serious side effects (aluminum adjuvants, for example, cross the blood-brain barrier and more or less permanently lodge in brains, where they can cause inflammation, swelling, demyelination, etc.).

This strategy enables researchers (and producers, and institutions, and all the other players in this sordid story) to literally state that “the new vaccine is as safe as placebo” or that “the rate of side effects was comparable to those from placebo”. In this way they can relatively successfully camouflage the true (high) rate of side effects. This is again a nice example of “how to lie without actually telling a lie.”

This problem was also pointed out by Tomljenovic and Shaw (2011a, 2630–2632): "...for the purpose of evaluating safety and efficacy, vaccine clinical trials often use an aluminum-containing placebo, either containing the same or greater amount of aluminum as the test vaccine. Without exception, these trials report a comparable rate of adverse reactions between the placebo and the vaccine group (for example, 63.7% vs. 65.3% of systemic events and 1.7% vs. 1.8% of serious adverse events respectively). According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a placebo is ‘an inactive pill, liquid, or powder that has no treatment value’. The well-established neurotoxic properties of aluminium therefore suggest that aluminum cannot constitute as a valid placebo. [...] While direct application of aluminum adjuvants to the central nervous system (CNS) is unquestionably neurotoxic, little is known about aluminum transport into and out of the CNS, its toxicokinetics, and the impact on different neuronal subpopulations following subcutaneous or intramuscular injections. The reason for this is that under current regulatory policies, evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties is not required for vaccines. This issue is of special concern in context to worldwide mass immunization practices involving children whose nervous systems are undergoing rapid development. Furthermore, an immature developing blood brain barrier (BBB) is more permeable to toxic substances than that of an adult. In addition, there are critical periods in neurodevelopment that occur within first few years of postnatal life during which exposure to neurotoxic insults may induce central nervous system (CNS) damage. In that respect, it is worth noting that any potential CNS damage caused by aluminum in children may not be evident until a later stage of development”.

5. Since there is no true placebo, there is also no true control group. Vaccinated children are never compared to unvaccinated ones. Especially not to truly unvaccinated ones (i.e. to children that have never received any vaccine). Supposedly, it would be terribly unethical if a group of study children would receive a true placebo and remain unvaccinated for at least a few months. However, it is perfectly “ethical and rational” to inject millions of children with multiple doses of vaccines whose safety has never been tested. It is “ethical and rational” to vaccinate children with these untested vaccine, loaded with neurotoxins, while they are still developing, while their immune and nervous system are still very vulnerable.

6. Side effects are literally observed. There are no blood tests, no neurological examinations[4] or any other adequate examinations. Only fever and swelling at the injection site are measured. Everything else is simply “observed”. By parents, who report their observations on diary cards. It is truly ironical that parental observations are accepted in the course of the study, yet are ridiculed, disregarded and negated in all other situations (like, for example, when concerned parents return to their doctor and report about child's changed behavior, screaming, regression). Even when study children exhibit clear symptoms of potential neurological injuries (like high-pitched crying, irritability, somnolence, etc.), they are not properly examined. And as a rule, almost all reactions, especially the more serious ones, are “believed to be unrelated to the vaccine”.

7. Majority of clinical trials is financed by producers[5]. And in the process of granting a marketing approval, all studies are financed and conducted by the producer. It would be very naive to think that this does not affects trial results. Independent research is scarce these days, but still, it “has repeatedly warned that drug companies may manipulate clinical trial designs and subsequent data analysis and reporting to make their drugs look better and safer [...] Keeping in mind that 'the primary interest of a pharmaceutical company is developing and selling pharmaceutical product', one must ask whether rational vaccine policy decisions should be based on conclusions derived from an uncritical acceptance of flawed vaccine safety and efficacy estimates provided by the vaccine manufacturer” (Tomljenovic and Shaw 2012d, p. e13).

8. Study reports are often too incomplete. But, as pointed out by Gajski (2009, pp. 66–67), "the methodology and design of clinical trials can only be judged on the basis of trial reports. Even though there are rules of reporting, methodology is often described poorly and incompletely, with important data and, in particular, side effects’ reports missing. Manipulation with procedures and data in scientific research is a well-known phenomenon. Excluding a few persons from the sample or adding a singular event can already ensure statistical reliability and produce the desired results. In fact, even complete forgeries can find their way through the filter of the most prestigious journals, as shown by a study published in The Lancet journal in 2005. The study demonstrated beneficial effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on the incidence of the oral cavity cancer. However, later it was proven that the author simply made up the study, the patients and the course of their disease".

In order to obtain at least an approximately reliable and realistic evaluation of a vaccine’s properties and actions, every study or summary thereof (including summaries of medicinal products’ characteristics) should contain at least the following information:

time and place of the performance of the study;
individual stages of the study with a detailed description of the design and course (including the timeline) of every stage;
the number of persons included in each stage and their characteristics (age, health condition, etc.), the size and characteristics of each category of the persons involved;
inclusion and exclusion criteria;
reasons for withdrawal from the study and the number of persons who withdrew from every individual stage;
detailed description of the executed procedures, e.g. in case of side effects, an accurate description of how long after each dose of vaccine the side effects were observed and recorded and how (whether they were only recorded and reported on cards by parents or whether any tests were performed – blood or neurological tests, magnetic resonance, etc.; if so, what were the results);
the vaccination regime, what was used as placebo, the constituents of all applied substances, including the placebo;
detailed description of the implemented protocols according to individual stages, including definitions of terms and criteria and explanations of deviations;
a detailed numerical representation of all results, including all partial results according to individual stages and categories of participants.
9. Only healthy children are included in trials. While this is a rational choice (also from the methodological point of view) the problem is that in reality, practically all children are vaccinated or are supposed to be vaccinated, including the ones with existing neurological or immunological disorders, autoimmune diseases, etc[6]. All these conditions can be caused by vaccination; if a child already suffers from one of them (either due to previous vaccinations or due to other causes) it is highly probable that vaccination would seriously aggravate his condition.

10. Vaccine is declared effective on the basis of its ability to induce the production of antibodies. However, the presence of antibodies does not equal protection, immunity, efficacy. Vaccine might even be completely ineffective, despite its ability to induce the production of antibodies. Thus, adequate[7] animal studies in which both vaccinated and unvaccinated (control) animals would be exposed to infectious agents should be mandatory part of registration process. Instead, such studies are practically never conducted, much less submitted in the registration process.

You can find a detailed and in-depth analysis of studies that were submitted in the process of granting the marketing authorization for some of the vaccines (e.g. Infanrix, M-M-R II, M-M-RVaxPro, HBVaxPro, Procomvax, Recombivax-HB) in my book Ideological Constructs of Vaccination.

The book Ideological Constructs of Vaccination addresses, in evidence-based detail, the shakiness, dubiousness, often even falseness of the most common, self-evident and deeply rooted claims about vaccines – about their safety, efficacy, rigorous testing and regulation, etc. – thus depicting a disturbing image of states’ and scientific institutions’ operation. It is based on the author’s doctoral thesis with the same title.

In the first part, the author, Dr. Mateja Cernic, points out the socio-political aspects of vaccination, from the legal regulation of vaccination to discourses, ideologies and representations of vaccination critics by the media. This part is important, as it enables readers to learn about vaccination policies and practices and helps them understand why there are such fierce battles between the supporters and opponents of vaccination.

The second part, which focuses on ideological constructs of vaccination, represents the main body of the book, where the most common claims about vaccination are systematically analyzed. It presents, among other things, certain mechanisms through which vaccines influence an organism (e.g. damage the nervous system and the immune system). All claims are systematically supported by references to scientific articles, government documents and official statistics.

The decision whether to vaccinate their children or not is one of the most important decisions parents make in connection to their children’s health and life. Therefore, it should never be taken in haste, without consideration, but rather after a thorough examination of the issue. The book Ideological Constructs of Vaccination can help you with that decision. Read it BEFORE your next vaccination appointment.

What others said about the book:

Dr. Stephanie Seneff, a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT

"This book is proof that the anti-vax movement is science-based! This new book is a masterpiece that presents detailed scientific arguments for why vaccines are not the panacea that they are claimed to be. It is a much welcomed addition to the growing body of literature revealing the damage the vaccination program is doing to our children. It is particularly effective in its portrayal of the ideological constructs that are used without basis to defend vaccines and keep the general population uninformed of the reality in terms of risk/benefit tradeoffs. The arguments are well supported by an extensive bibliography. You should buy extra copies of this book ready to hand out to any of your friends who claim that there's no science behind the anti-vaccine movement!"

Dr. Jayne LM Donegan, MBBS DRCOG DCH DFFP MRCGP MFHom

"It is a minutely researched, scholarly and very readable piece of work that will not disappoint the most thorough researcher or parent who is wanting to have the multiple topics and references to do with vaccination and health policy in one logically ordered resource. For anyone wanting to have a comprehensive, one volume, reference work to read about every aspect of vaccination science and policy, this is the one to get. I cannot recommend it too highly. Buy it and read it. You will be pleased that you did."

More on: https://www.amazon.com/Ideological-constructs-vaccination-Mateja-Cernic/dp/1909736104

Delight

12th May 2019, 07:35

Gary Null Phd has produced several vaccine related documentaries. They are all informative, especially useful for assembling responses to those who claim "Vaccination, that excellent settled science is the most important public health measure. Vaccines are 100% safe, effective and absolutely necessary"

What is so eerie is that all this information has been available and yet here we are now in 2019 and many well meaning people are completely oblivious to their own self interest.

Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional.

K1m3TjokVU4

Vaccine Nation (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1214118/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl)

This Gary Null, Ph.D. documentary challenges the assumption that vaccines are PERFECTLY safe. The use of heavy metals such as mercury, connections to autism and the high number of vaccines given at a very young age to children are among the arguments presented. The story chronicles the nightmare of parents who lost a child soon after a vaccination series and the father was sent to prison for murdering his child but was later released. Government cover-ups and deceptions with corruption in the scientific community are illustrated by those featured in Vaccine Nation. A list of participants in the film can be found at vaccinenation.net.

494NacYFmko

Jeremy R. Hammond
The government perpetually lies to the public about important issues. The mainstream media dutifully serve to manufacture consent for criminal policies.

I free people’s minds by exposing state propaganda intended to keep them in servitude to the politically and financially powerful. My writings empower readers with the knowledge to see through the deceptions and fight for a better future, for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

On March 8, 2019, I was interviewed by Gary Null on his radio show. We discussed how we are being bombarded with vaccine propaganda by the government and mainstream corporate media.

The impetus for the invite to come on his show was my recent article, “How to Immunize Yourself Against Vaccine Propaganda“, which utterly demolishes lying vaccine propaganda dished out by the New York Times editorial board in a piece attacking anyone who dares to criticize or dissent from the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule as “the enemy”.

In our discussion, I explain how, far from being dangerously irrational and ignorant of the science, many parents are doing their own research by digging into the medical literature and seeing for themselves how they are being lied to.

My interview begins at about the 27:00 minute mark. Enjoy!

7IWn0gdgUn0

Delight

12th May 2019, 08:44

Examples of what is "out there" in the medical literature. Added for those who want to dig more.....

The BMJ (The BMJ is one of the world's oldest general medical journals. It published its first weekly edition on 3 October 1840) allowed this editorial which addresses an aspect of vaccination for measles.

Editorials
Measles: neither gone nor forgotten
(Published 25 September 2018)

Wild vs Artificial Exposure to Measles Are Not Equal (https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3976/rr-11?fbclid=IwAR2xmEdFIULx6mnrrhuOo517GJVHijoLs4q-VFPji8q9bHGtkKSf4teHrns)

There is a fact rarely considered by public health officials: vaccination is not an intervention that eliminates disease exposure for individuals. Vaccination replaces wild exposure with artificial exposure, and they are not equal. We are many decades into mass vaccination campaigns, and it is alarming that instead of the medical and scientific community stepping back to examine the overall impact on public and individual health to see if current strategies should be reevaluated, the focus is on those who question or refuse vaccination.

Experts have acknowledged that the current measles vaccine cannot eradicate measles because of primary and secondary failure.[1] Studies have found that the concentration and duration of maternal antibody protection for infants with vaccinated mothers is lower and shorter than protection provided by non-vaccinated mothers [2] , and it has been found that a third dose of MMR cannot boost protection for any length of time [3] , leaving most adults unprotected. We have entered a vaccine-era of vulnerable infants and vulnerable older adults—populations that were protected when measles circulated naturally. It’s a messy conundrum, and it cannot be laid at the feet of those who opt out of vaccination. For the vast majority of healthy children who can easily handle a case of measles in childhood, vaccination provides no personal benefit and exposes them only to vaccine injury risk and vulnerability to measles in adulthood.

Since industry does not make a single measles vaccine available, that leaves just the controversial MMR that appears to not have had any clinical trials. MMR contains fragmented fetal DNA in the rubella portion, which some find morally objectionable and others medically problematic because of the potential for autoimmunity and insertional mutagenesis [4] . As well, the vaccine is highly contaminated with glyphosate from the gelatin [5] , and there are no studies showing injecting glyphosate to be safe or how it may alter the immune response to the other ingredients. Add that Merck has been accused of falsifying the efficacy of the mumps portion of their vaccine [6] and, Houston, we have a problem.

100% vaccination uptake would not alter the dilemma of vaccine failure or risk. The WHO chose a goal of global eradication before they had a safe tool able to achieve it. Rather than pushing for higher uptake, time and money would be far better spent on implementing rapid diagnosis and notification programs using new technologies to utilize good old-fashioned detection & isolation, researching best and safest measles treatments, and building the basics of healthy immunity in poor communities: clean water, proper sanitation, and adequate nutrition.

[1] Poland, Gregory A and Robert M Jacobson. “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries: time to develop the next-generation measles vaccines?” Vaccine vol. 30,2 (2012): 103-4.

[2] Waaijenborg, et al. “Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage.” OUP Academic, Oxford University Press, 8 May 2013, academic.oup.com/jid/article/208/1/10/796786.

[3] Fiebelkorn AP, Coleman LA, Belongia EA, et al. Measles virus neutralizing antibody response, cell-mediated immunity, and IgG antibody avidity before and after a third dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in young adults. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2016;213(7):1115-1123. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv555.

[4] Deisher, T A, et al. “Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence.” Issues in Law & Medicine., U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2015, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103708.

[5] Honeycutt, Zen. “Glyphosate in Childhood Vaccines.” Moms Across America, www.momsacrossamerica.com/glyphosate_in_childhood_vaccines.

[6] Solomon, Lawrence. “Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims.” HuffPost Canada, HuffPost Canada, 27 Nov. 2014, www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/merck-whistleblowers_b_5881914.html.

Written in 1999!

Public should be told that vaccines may have long term adverse effects
BMJ. 1999 Jan 16
John Barthelow Classen, President*
Classen Immunotherapies, 6517 Montrose Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21212, USA ten.seniccav@nessalC
David C Classen, Infectious disease physician*
Division of Infectious Diseases, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1114674/?fbclid=IwAR3deab-IGO3DvcpWjDEAERtEpPKQJR7vPOkzacJFXSSOeELP3583q-vUnc)

editor—Jefferson’s editorial about vaccination and its adverse effects mentions our research.
1. We found that immunisation starting at birth was associated with a decreased risk of insulin dependent diabetes, while immunisation starting after age 2 months was associated with an increased risk of diabetes in both rodents and humans.
2. We initiated a collaboration with Dr Jaakko Tuomilehto to study the effect of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine on the incidence of diabetes. Roughly 116 000 Finnish children were randomised to receive either four doses of the vaccine, starting at 3 months of age, or one dose at 24 months of age.
3. We calculated the incidence of insulin dependent diabetes in both groups until age 10 and in a group that did not receive the vaccine—a cohort that included all 128 500 children born in Finland in the 24 months before the study of the vaccine began.

A conference was held in Bethesda, Maryland, in May 1998 to discuss our data. At the conference we stated that the data on the vaccine support our published findings that immunisation starting after the age of 2 months is associated with an increased risk of diabetes. Our analysis is further supported by a similar rise in diabetes after immunisation with H influenzae type b vaccine in the United States4 and United Kingdom.5 Furthermore, the increased risk of diabetes in the vaccinated group exceeds the expected decreased risk of complications of H influenzae meningitis.

Research into immunisation has been based on the theory that the benefits of immunisation far outweigh the risks from delayed adverse events and so long term safety studies do not need to be performed. When looking at diabetes—only one potential chronic adverse event—we found that the rise in the prevalence of diabetes may more than offset the expected decline in long term complications of H influenzae meningitis. Thus diabetes induced by vaccine should not be considered a rare potential adverse event. The incidence of many other chronic immunological diseases, including asthma, allergies, and immune mediated cancers, has risen rapidly and may also be linked to immunisation.

We believe that the public should be fully informed that vaccines, though effective in preventing infections, may have long term adverse effects. An educated public will probably increasingly demand proper safety studies before widespread immunisation. We believe that the outcome of this decision will be the development of safer vaccine technology.

Go to:
References
1. Jefferson T. Vaccination and its adverse effects: real or perceived. BMJ. 1998;317:159–160. . (18 July.) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Classen DC, Classen JB. The timing of pediatric immunization and the risk of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 1997;6:449–454. [Google Scholar]
3. Eskola J, Kayhty H, Takala AK, Peltola H, Ronnberg PR, Kela E, et al. A randomized, prospective field trial of a conjugated vaccine in the protection of infants and young children against invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1381–1387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Dokheel TM. An epidemic of childhood diabetes in the United States. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:1606–1611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Gardner S, Bingley PJ, Sawtell PA, Weeks S, Gale EA. Rising incidence of insulin dependent diabetes in children under 5 years in Oxford region: time trend analysis. BMJ. 1997;315:713–716. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

May 3, 2013
my (The Refurbished Rogue's Blog) list of peer reviewed vaccine research (https://therefurbishedrogue.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/my-list-of-peer-reviewed-vaccine-research/?fbclid=IwAR3SBlYzNP3crSr0sU3sxwA3ck9QWKUFxD1Ks4-RKxd5vq0t-elJA8o6G4Q)

Delight

13th May 2019, 00:15

For those who have access to facebook, there is a talk on 5/10/2019 at UCLA promoting SB276 that is really important to suss the end game.

https://www.facebook.com/lairafromthestars/videos/2315314218756626/ (https://www.facebook.com/lairafromthestars/videos/2315314218756626/)

This was filmed this morning, on a FB *LIVE* (that ultimately was taken down by FB) at the scheduled #UCLA #PressConference with Senator Richard #Pan, along with #Rabbi Hershy Z. Ten and others, on the “economic impact” of #Measles outbreaks, and “cost to the public”....all while literally distracting the public from the staggering fiscal impact that #SB276 would bring us.

What MSM won’t report:

▪️Pan says people are “purchasing” exemptions. But all legitimate exemptions cost money, no matter what. And aren’t free, and are very difficult to acquire...so..

▪️Someone asked Pan how he can even tell if medical exemptions are “fraudulent.” Pan said they haven’t tracked them, so he can’t answer that. So then HOW can he claim there’s a problem? Amazing.

▪️Pan said exemptions went up. But va¢¢ine injury went UP, so who wouldn’t want to escape the source of their injury?

▪️At about 19:10 (for about 20 secs convo), when We the People were asking questions, Pan’s handler says “This doesn’t help your cause.”
What does that mean? What was she implying? That #FreeThinking and asking questions about the current situation are #wrong? And is she implying that questions would bring repercussions or sorts? What a sinister thing to say. And does she care that their #lies make our “cause” flourish with vaccine injury?

Watch til the end, guys...and listen closely to his words: “Airports,” “Quarantine,” and much more that they won’t air on MSM.

Oh, and....

▪️At the 31:00 mark “Thank God no child has actually died from a vaccine.” -Sen. Richard Pan #InfantMortality #VAERS #VaccineCourt #MortalAdverseReactions #VaccinePackageInserts

Btw I was interviewed by 3 news stations (the latter interview was audio recorded only), and only facts were given. So, nothing will be aired. They conduct their little fake media circus, they mold and shape the narrative the way that they want to, but they never EVER listen to #ThePeople.

Video editing by Joshua Coleman.

“Storm Trooper” sample credit: https://www.facebook.com/1676881282606697/posts/2013064765655012?s=100008342108251&v=e&sfns=xmwa

“Senator Pan Manhandles The Media” sample credit: https://youtu.be/PXKGXHKdQjM

Please share his disinformation, as the circulation of this video will be interfered with for certain. Thanks.
#EgregiousOverreach #Corruption #Censorship #PanRan

Delight

13th May 2019, 02:02

This was very interesting on several levels... looking at energy dynamics of cells, how persuasion changes consciousness as in persuading to believe in vaccine safety) and how glutathione and stress (people experiencing oxidative stress) are important

AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire Paperback – May 11, 2010
by MD Nancy Turner Banks (Author) (https://www.amazon.com/Opium-Diamonds-Empire-Nancy-Turner/dp/1450201717)

In AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire, author Nancy Turner Banks draws the connections between free market strategies, the destruction of national sovereignty by the process of globalization, and AIDS as one of the health consequences of a neo-Darwinian philosophy. Through meticulous research, Banks found a medicalpharmaceutical- industrial complex that was taken over one hundred years ago by the titans of financial capitalism. Their aim was to create profit, not to conquer disease. This book of social history points to a cauldron of historical events that contributed to the HIV/AIDS crisis.

AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire tells the dramatic story of a financial ideology that is damaging to everything that it means to be human. It is the story of profits over people. In the end, it is the story of hope and how we can regain our sanity and our health in a world gone mad.

Vaccines and the Planned Singularity - Not On My Watch - Nancy Turner Banks slides (https://www.dropbox.com/s/y05fazds6fmrhm9/AutismOne%202nd%20version.pptx?dl=0#)

Vaccines and the Planned Singularity - Not On My Watch - Nancy Turner Banks
Published on Jun 1, 2018

From Plato and Malthus to Aldous Huxley, Paul Ehrlich, and Bill Gates, there has been a long history of western thought shapers who have opined that there are simply too many people on the planet. Until the last century, there was no practical method short of war, genocide, and starvation to actually impose fertility controls on mass populations. The rise of both the eugenically inspired allopathic medical model and molecular biology now combined with the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence have allowed the stealth global introduction of quiet weapons of population management warfare. Vaccines are just one of multiple strategic weapons being deployed in advancing the transhumanist agenda by the new breed of space age technocrats. Without turning into Luddites, we have the power to stop this soulless anti-science in its tracks.

Nancy Turner Banks, MD, MBA

B0GovtKvBFE

Published on Mar 8, 2019
Author of "AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire" and "The Slow Death of the AIDS/Cancer Paradigm"

4WiM2cU_gbM

Nancy Banks, a Harvard Medical School trained MD, about her new book, “The Slow Death of the AIDS/Cancer Paradigm”. She believes that approaches to cancer, and the entire HIV=AIDS=Death dogma are based on a flawed understanding of eukaryotic cell metabolism, eukaryotic referring to all cells with a membrane enclosed nucleus, as in all higher plants and animals. Nancy is not just a theoretician, she used her knowledge as an expert witness defending people from the criminal impact of the HIV=AIDS dogma in court, resulting in reduced sentences or overturned charges in most cases. listen to interview here (https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-hakei-80b244)

I think highly of Barbara Loe Fisher

Society has Reached Tipping Point: Vaccine Reactions, Autism, Disabilities w/Barbara Loe Fisher

Sarah Westall
Published on Apr 3, 2017
Barbara Loe Fisher, Co-founder and President of the National Vaccine Information Center, joins the program to dive deep into the vaccine issue. She believes society has reached a tipping point with vaccine reactions and that the industry and government needs to be much smarter for the sake of society and future generations.

WszYAxeJ_og

Delight

13th May 2019, 04:25

I have been wondering WHY NOW the ramped up escalation of mandated vaccination? I keep looking to understand how in the face of declining health indicators associated with increased number of vaccines, public policy is fixated and actually blatantly LYING to the population about the need and benefits. I keep looking and the terrible evidence mounts that it is to intentionally weaken "the herd"... all of us who live here in the US.

Compared to all other developed countries, the US mandates more vaccines.

In April 2009, Generation Rescue issued a fascinating study, Vaccines and Autism around the World, with a stunning observation:

"The United States has the highest number of mandated vaccines for children under 5 in the world (36, double the Western world average of 18), the highest autism rate in the world (1 in 110 children, 10 times or more the rate of some other Western countries), but only places 34th in the world for its children under 5 mortality rate. What’s going on?"One table provides particularly concerning data (https://www.fourteenstudies.org/nowwhat.html)

Go anywhere in America and look around and the numbers of obese people is staggering. In the Interview with Sarah Westall and Barbara Loe Fisher (BLF), the concern was voiced that people in the US are noticeably more obese and just don't look as healthy. Vaccines have been associated with obesity already

Vaccines, Not Diet, Are Causing Epidemic Of Obesity And Type 2 Diabetes According To New Paper From Classen Immunotherapies Inc.
Published: Jun 26, 2017
(https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/vaccines-not-diet-are-causing-epidemic-of-obesity-and-type-2-diabetes-according-to-new-paper-from-classen-immunotherapies-inc-/)

MANCHESTER, Md., June 26, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- A newly published paper in June's Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity, 5(3): 1107, by immunologist J. Bart Classen, MD of Classen Immunotherapies provides further proof of the dangers of vaccines. The paper reviews the growing evidence that many cases of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome are inflammatory conditions and that vaccine induced inflammation is the cause of the epidemic of these diseases. Upon receiving a vaccine some individuals' immune system becomes hyper active leading to autoimmune destruction of insulin secreting cells and the development of type 1 diabetes. Many other individuals produce increased cortisol and other immune suppressing molecules, to suppress the vaccine induced inflammation. This increased production leads to type 2 diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome. The new paper reviews evidence supporting vaccines, not diet, as a cause of the epidemics of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

"The new paper reviews proof that vaccines are much more dangerous than the public is lead to believe. Adequate testing has never been performed to indicate that there is an overall improvement in health from immunization. One major problem with vaccines is the one dose fits all approach. In order to induce protection to infection in the 1% of the population with the weakest immune system, vaccines are over stimulating the immune system of the remaining 99% of the population and this is leading to epidemics of inflammatory diseases," states Dr. J. Bart Classen.

To view published papers http://www.vaccines.net/publications-of-j-bart-classen-md and to find out the latest information on the effects of vaccines on autoimmune diseases including insulin dependent diabetes and metabolic syndrome, visit the Vaccine Safety Website http://www.vaccines.net

Contact:
J. B. Classen
Classen Immunotherapies
410-377-8526
classen@vaccines.net

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-not-diet-are-causing-epidemic-of-obesity-and-type-2-diabetes-according-to-new-paper-from-classen-immunotherapies-300479316.html

SOURCE Classen Immunotherapies, Inc.

I did not know about the 21st Century Cures Act passed in 2016 (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/selected-amendments-fdc-act/21st-century-cures-act) until BLF mentioned it.

Featured Priority: Vaccine Innovation (https://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/featured-priorities/vaccine-innovation/index.html)
Vaccine innovation – including the development of new and improved vaccines – is critical to improving public health and tackling emerging disease threats. NVPO works with federal and non-federal partners to encourage vaccine innovation in several ways.

21st Century Cures Report on Encouraging Vaccine Innovation
The 21st Century Cures Act - PDF, signed into law in 2016, intends to accelerate the process of discovery, development, and delivery of health care innovation. A provision of the Act directs HHS to submit a report to Congress on encouraging vaccine innovation. The final report examines the current state of U.S. vaccine development and innovation, highlights existing challenges, and offers potential opportunities and levers that have the potential to shift the balance of decision-making to favor innovation.

Read the report: Encouraging Vaccine Innovation: Promoting the Development of Vaccines that Minimize the Burden of Infectious Diseases in the 21st Century - PDF

National Vaccine Plan
Developing new and improved vaccines is one of five goals outlined in the National Vaccine Plan. This goal calls for improved understanding of new vaccine targets as well as support for upstream research and innovations in vaccine development and delivery. Read more about this goal.

As a step toward this goal, NVPO partnered to develop the SMART Vaccine Tool.

National Adult Immunization Plan
Goal 4 of the National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) aims to foster innovation in adult vaccine development and vaccine-related technologies. It encourages the development of new, more effective vaccines for adults and technological advancements in improving vaccine delivery. Read more about this goal. (https://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national-adult-immunization-plan/goal-1/index.html)

And to reiterate, this same government has allowed the shift of all liability onto the tax payers where VAERS itself has estimated that only 1% of true morbidity has been reported.

I know I am fixated on this subject. Everyday I hear anecdotes from my friends and family. They are frustrated and bewildered by the daily and often excruciating pain of chronic illness (and constant anger that the health care system is expensive, bullying and not restoring health).

onawah

13th May 2019, 04:31

The US has always presented the greatest threat to the European royals, and now to the NWO.
Too many freedoms, too unpredictable, too much wealth and influence.
I think they want to disempower the US by any means possible.

I have been wondering WHY NOW the ramped up escalation of mandated vaccination? I keep looking to understand how in the face of declining health indicators associated with increased number of vaccines, public policy is fixated and actually blatantly LYING to the population about the need and benefits. I keep looking and the terrible evidence mounts that it is to intentionally weaken "the herd"... all of us who live here in the US.

Delight

13th May 2019, 04:43

The US has always presented the greatest threat to the European royals, and now to the NWO.
Too many freedoms, too unpredictable, too much wealth and influence.
I think they want to disempower the US by any means possible.

These forces are using our medical government collusion and the latest media blackouts of people ( including all "antivax" info and silencing reporters like Rappoport).

The true goal of immunization

Jon Rappoport
April 3, 2019

In the recent propaganda campaign, designed to use a measles outbreak as an example of what happens when parents don’t vaccinate their children, commentators have stated that, prior to the “epidemic,” measles cases in the area had shrunk to zero—as if eliminating the disease were a proper goal of vaccination.

This is bluster and nonsense. At one time, before the obsession to give shots took hold, parents would take their children to the home of a child who had come down with measles, so these kids could catch the illness and be done with it.

Zero reported measles cases is no sign that all is well. Vaccines can and do cause other very serious disease problems, and because the symptoms don’t resemble measles, other names are given to these conditions, and no connection is made to the effects of vaccines.

The true goal of immunization has nothing to do with vaccination. It has to do with strengthening a child’s immune system so he/she can stage an acute and full inflammatory response when illness occurs, after which the child gains lifelong immunity from measles, mumps, chickenpox, and the like.

A child with a weak immune system will become ill from a number of causes, regardless of vaccinations. One of these major causes is poor nutrition. No vaccine can cure that. Good clean food can.

But these simple facts are ignored as “conspiracy theory” by doctors. If a mainstream doctor gives any credence to the idea of making the immune system stronger, he’ll deny this reduces or eliminates the need for vaccination.

Of course, the medical attacks leveled at “anti-vaxxers” are, at the highest level, nothing more than an insistence that chemical drugs and vaccines must continue to sell. These power players are quite aware that a sensible and natural approach to healthcare does, as a matter of course, vastly reduce the interest in their products.

When it comes to fundamental politics, the medical cartel has, for a hundred years—backed by government and huge media operations—been engaged in the process of holding the planet hostage to chemical treatments. This is an example of why the Founders never permitted government to engage in commercial operations.

The result would be enforced monopoly.

The BIGGEST threat IMO is the herd that has turned on itself. When you see how people (legislators are people too) refuse to shake hands with those mothers attempting to discuss the issues of HEALTH undermined. When families are divided by fear of measles. When hardly anyone thinks this issue of forced vaccination is an ASSAULT... all I can feel is WTF (WE THE F@#$ED)

onawah

13th May 2019, 05:04

Unfortunately, the NWO agenda has been working all too well.

Delight

13th May 2019, 05:25

Unfortunately, the NWO agenda has been working all too well.

This is not EXACTLY the nail on the head but "we are being subjected to breaking" deliberately: made helpless, dependent and shame filled.

pZGqDv-tuAM

ThePythonicCow

13th May 2019, 06:41

This is not EXACTLY the nail on the head but "we are being subjected to breaking" deliberately: made helpless, dependent and shame filled.
The individualists versus the socialists.

The individualists respect their own free will and that of others. They treat each other with the respect the other deserves, with the benefit of the doubt. They consider each of us sovereign beings, with innate or God given (depending on their religion) rights, abilities and potentials.

The socialists demean our personal spirit to some sicko inner Freudian psychosis complex that we hardly know, and demean our shared endeavors with others to being but mandated loyalty to various groups, movements, and other collective entities ... that the power mad amongst them are destined to construct and control.

The socialists strive to split the sovereign man, between these inner and outer facsimiles of a sovereign being, until they lose sight of their true self, their spirit. Collectively mandated political correctness, forever whimsically changing, replaces actually seeing and respecting those you are interacting with, on an individual basis.

The socialists destroy our culture, our food, our healing arts, our water, our air, our history, our schools, our literature, our families, our communities, ... and our medicines ... hell bent on weakening the "aberrant individual", to better tame the herd.

... and our medicines ... such as the vaccines we speak of on this thread.

Delight

13th May 2019, 06:41

Of course the assault is global

Australia Issues Warning To Doctors Who Fail To Promote Vaccines

POSTED BY: VAXXTER STAFF 05/11/2019 (https://vaxxter.com/australia-issues-warning-to-doctors-who-fail-to-promote-vaccines/)

The war on vaccine safety rhetoric just got more intense in Australia. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Authority [Ahpra] is warning the country’s medical professionals not to dissent on vaccine safety messaging. The group says that medical professionals have an obligation to promote the idea that vaccines are safe and effective.

The group is using 35,204 confirmed cases of flu as their reasoning for issuing the harsh statement. GlaxoSmithKline is importing high volumes of measles vaccines to deal with new cases. There are a total of 83 new measles cases reported in Australia this year.

Martin Fletcher, Ahpra chief executive, says he’s worried that chiropractors, doctors, and nurses, are enabling anti-vaccination views on social media. Ahpra is asking the public to turn in non-compliant medical professionals so that officials can open investigations.

“We take seriously any case of practitioners spreading dangerous and misleading anti-vaccination information including on social media,” he said via the guardian. “They will face regulatory action or prosecution. We are asking the public to tell us if their practitioner is doing this. If you raise your concerns with us we can investigate and protect others.”

However, Australia’s new measles cases are being blamed on the “undervaccinated” rather than local anti-vaccine movements. For many, this issue has little to do with perceived health implications of vaccines and more to do with parental rights. Many parents who vaccinate their children oppose Australia’s stringent vaccine laws and censorship agenda.

Activists groups and parents who support parental medical rights are outraged by Ahpra’s statement. But Australian officials are likely to continue to defy any public outcry over parental rights. The country has a long history of subverting its citizen’s rights. All citizens were disarmed beginning in 1996.

Delight

13th May 2019, 07:06

The individualists respect their own free will and that of others. They treat each other with the respect the other deserves, with the benefit of the doubt. They consider each of us sovereign beings, with innate or God given (depending on their religion) rights, abilities and potentials.

....(THE LIFE HATERS) destroy our culture, our food, our healing arts, our food, our water, our air, our history, our schools, our literature, our families, our communities, ... and our medicines ... hell bent on weakening the "aberrant individual", to better tame the herd.

... and our medicines ... such as the vaccines we speak of on this thread.

Thanks so much for all your energy here on this thread. You make me smile.

I feel a little conflicted about the definitions. As a young adult in University till much later than the time I was in college, I met many foreign students and had a boyfriend who had been involved in fighting the Greek Junta which collapsed in 1974 so he was able to come to the US. He identified himself as a follower of the philosophy of Nikos Kazantzakis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikos_Kazantzakis#Democratic_Socialism)

Democratic Socialism
Throughout his life, Kazantzakis reiterated his belief that "only socialism as the goal and democracy as the means" could provide an equitable solution to the "frightfully urgent problems of the age in which we are living."[7] He saw the need for socialist parties throughout the world to put aside their bickering and unite so that the program of "socialist democracy" could prevail not just in Greece, but throughout the civilized world.[7] He described socialism as a social system which "does not permit the exploitation of one person by another" and that "must guarantee every freedom."[7]

Kazantzakis was anathema to the right-wing in Greece both before and after World War 2. The right waged war against his books and called him "immoral" and a "Bolshevik troublemaker" and accused him of being a Russian agent.[8] He was also distrusted by the Greek and Russian Communist parties as a "bourgeois" thinker.[8] However, upon his death in 1957, he was honored by the Chinese Communist party as a "great writer" and "devotee of peace."

I am quoting this as it is about honoring the individual and guaranteeing freedom. At the same time, one must confront the means to care for the social infrastructure (health, education, productive opportunities to work etc.).

I absolutely detest the way words are used politically to evoke knee jerk reactions to manipulated "given definitions". It does not matter what words one used because the truth is what is vital... we are human beings who need basic hygiene (an environment of clean water, necessities of life), the opportunity to be creative, have community, learn how to love others and self.

I say it is not the "words". Who is standing for the facts that the words are supposed to point towards? I don't trust political "parties" as they just seek to perpetuate their power and IMO they all are hate groups.

I am adding a bit of song to break the monotony. I am pretty sure all these assaults are synergistic. I want the restoration PARTY (celebration), a natural SYNERGY collective to live in.

GwhYWdp2EBc

and Monty Python

t2c-X8HiBng

Delight

13th May 2019, 08:56

One more with Sherri Tenpenny because every interview has a new bit of information. Glyphosate gets into vaccines via cows eating grass with glyphosate and then the bovine serum and gelatin have glyphosate which replaces glycine in the body. She says that once glyphosate gets in the body, one can't get it out. My next investigation is about what to do about detox if possible?

fA1NfaMuExE

Maybe this may help?

Top Tips to Detox Your Body
Written by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
January 27, 2019 (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/01/27/top-tips-to-detox.aspx)

Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt is well known for his successful treatment of neurological illness and Lyme disease with integrative medicine. Originally from Berlin, Germany, Klinghardt has practiced medicine in the U.S. for over 35 years. He also sees patients in England and Switzerland.
.............
Detoxification Strategy for Glyphosate
While you may have over 20,000 chemicals in your body, two that are particularly hazardous to your brain are glyphosate and aluminum. Glyphosate is an analog of the amino acid glycine.1 It attaches in places where you need glycine. Importantly, glycine is used up in the detoxification process, hence many of us do not have enough glycine for efficient detoxification.

To eliminate glyphosate, you need to saturate your body with glycine. Klinghardt recommends taking 1 teaspoon (4 grams) of glycine powder twice a day for a few weeks and then lower the dose to one-fourth teaspoon (1 gram) twice a day. This forces the glyphosate out of your system, allowing it to be eliminated through your urine.

I personally have been taking 1 gram twice a day for some time now. The glycine is inexpensive and actually tastes sweet. Ideally it is best to take it around the time you are eating food that might be contaminated with glyphosate.

"At least for a while, we use high doses of glycine. There are no issues with it. There are no problems with it. The other one that has been published is admittedly only a chicken study that shows that humic acid and fulvic acid can completely clean up the organ systems of a chicken …

So, we do the glycine for a while. We monitor the urine output of glyphosate. When that slows down — in some people two months, in some it's six months — we back off on the glycine and go on a smaller dose."

How to Detox Aluminum
Aluminum is even more sinister. Stephenie Seneff, Ph.D., has shown that aluminum, when it gets in the extracellular space, completely changes the voltage on the cell walls — the voltage-gated channels — and has a profound effect on the microstructure of that matrix.2

"It basically impairs the receptors that we have on the cell wall, hormone receptors, neurotransmitter receptors, insulin receptors. They all get messed up by aluminum. It has a really, really strong effect, stronger than any other toxin," Klinghardt says.

"Seneff's work shows that glyphosate is a chelating agent. When you have glyphosate in the food, it binds all the trace minerals. They're no longer available for absorption. It depletes us of trace minerals. However, there's one exception and that's aluminum. It works like a shuttle agent for aluminum. It binds aluminum, takes it across the gut wall into the tissues, and distributes it widely."

One common ailment related to aluminum toxicity is underactive thyroid (hypothyroid), which is incredibly common these days. Aluminum hydoxides — such as that found in antiacids — actually interferes with intestinal absorption of thyroid hormones.3 Being a metal, it also has an affinity for the nervous system, and tends to collect in your brain, spinal cord and the enteric nervous system of the gut.4 In all of these places, it blocks vital functions.

To eliminate aluminum, you need to increase your intake of silica. Klinghardt recommends using silica-rich herbs for this, such as cilantro. "Dr. Yoshiaki Omura did a study5 20 years ago where he showed that you could decrease aluminum content in the animal model very quickly just by giving a cilantro extract," he says. Other good options are horsetail (which is also high in silica) and a liposomal silica product called BioSil.

Citric acid has also been shown to mobilize aluminum. An easy and inexpensive strategy is to squeeze some lemon into a bottle of water and drink it throughout the day. Malic acid — apple cider vinegar — is another. You can also buy malic acid in capsule form, or use magnesium malate.

"Medical doctors can use desferal. It's an injectable that's injected once a week subcutaneously. It's an excellent detoxer. However, there is some question as to whether it crosses the blood-brain barrier or not. Silica does. Desferal probably not, but you can debulk the aluminum in the body with a once-a-week injection."

Dr. Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She has a BS degree from MIT in biology and a PhD from MIT in electrical engineering and computer science.

Her recent interests have focused on the role of toxic chemicals and micronutrient deficiencies in health and disease, with a special emphasis on the pervasive herbicide, Roundup, and the mineral, sulfur. She has authored over two dozen peer-reviewed journal papers over the past few years on these topics.https://myersdetox.com/166-glyphosate-herbicide-and-how-to-detox-it-with-dr-stephanie-seneff/

CmAsTrsUjBc

Hervé

13th May 2019, 11:41

...

http://thepythoniccow.us/kissinger-vaccines-D6UBAjqXsAEvcPQ.jpg

Pam

13th May 2019, 12:21

The US has always presented the greatest threat to the European royals, and now to the NWO.
Too many freedoms, too unpredictable, too much wealth and influence.
I think they want to disempower the US by any means possible.

I have been wondering WHY NOW the ramped up escalation of mandated vaccination? I keep looking to understand how in the face of declining health indicators associated with increased number of vaccines, public policy is fixated and actually blatantly LYING to the population about the need and benefits. I keep looking and the terrible evidence mounts that it is to intentionally weaken "the herd"... all of us who live here in the US.

Good questions, onawah. I suspect that as a nation there is really no way to create direct physical force as in warlike situations without an uprising. I think we are being weakened by a multi pronged approach. These would include diet, fluoridation, social media, vaccines, pharmacological and I'm sure there are many, many more. It is easier to control malnourished, mentally weak, poorly educated, indoctrinated,physically compromised masses. It really is rather brilliant because very few even know it is happening to them and most will fight like hell to maintain the "freedom" of these chains that bind.

Pam

13th May 2019, 12:33

...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6UBAjqXsAEvcPQ.jpg:large

Although I wouldn't be surprised if Kissinger really felt this way, I don't believe he really made that speech. I don't think he would use that wording and I don't think he would be that direct after all, we was a politician type. Also, I could find nothing on the World Health Organization on Eugenics.

Blacklight43

13th May 2019, 12:55

Herve I tried posting Henry Ks. quote on FB and their factchecker says it's fake.

Hervé

13th May 2019, 13:25

Herve I tried posting Henry Ks. quote on FB and their factchecker says it's fake.Can one really trust a Facebook fact checker?

Apparently there weren't any kind of WHO meeting on that date, so I take that the quoted material is a paraphrased concoction of the many actual quotes from Key Singer displaying his love for world populations... see this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?25102-For-an-idea-on-the-big-picture&p=1291262&viewfull=1#post1291262) for some background history.

:focus:

genevieve

13th May 2019, 15:52

ThePythonicCow

13th May 2019, 16:09

...
Once the herd accepts mandatory forcible vaccination, it’s game over! ...
I doubt that Kissinger ever said any such thing; he's not as dumb as gaffe machine Joe Biden.

I doubt even that there is a World Health Organization Council on Eugenics.

However I suspect that this quote is rather well in line with their private thoughts.

===

P.S. -- Once again, I see I should read the rest of the thread before responding. I see that I am late to the party with this post.

ThePythonicCow

13th May 2019, 17:22

I feel a little conflicted about the definitions. As a young adult in University till much later than the time I was in college, I met many foreign students and had a boyfriend who had been involved in fighting the Greek Junta which collapsed in 1974 so he was able to come to the US. He identified himself as a follower of the philosophy of Nikos Kazantzakis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikos_Kazantzakis#Democratic_Socialism)

Democratic Socialism
Throughout his life, Kazantzakis reiterated his belief that "only socialism as the goal and democracy as the means" could provide an equitable solution to the "frightfully urgent problems of the age in which we are living."[7] He saw the need for socialist parties throughout the world to put aside their bickering and unite so that the program of "socialist democracy" could prevail not just in Greece, but throughout the civilized world.[7] He described socialism as a social system which "does not permit the exploitation of one person by another" and that "must guarantee every freedom."[7]

Ah - I made a common mistake.

When rebutting a view that seems to over emphasize one thing (say "A"), to the detriment of another (say "B"), it's too easy to fall into the trap of over emphasizing the other ("B").

Sometimes it's both "A" and "B".

In this case, there are three things, three layers, to consider: (1) One's inner psyche, (2) One's sovereign interactions with others, and (3) Groupings and organizations of people.

Contrary to the way I explained it above, all three count.

I was trying to point out that the culture encouraged by the Elite Bastards encourages us to think that we are prisoners of our Freudian psyche, and loyal participants in various groupings. It does so at the expense of deprecating the thoughts and actions of the sovereign individual.

Groupings do matter. The implication of my choice of the term "socialist" for the culture encouraged by the Elite Bastards is that groupings are toxic to the sovereign individual. I agree that that implication is unfortunate.

All three of the above layers matter.

===

I would differ however with the desirability of a social system which "does not permit the exploitation of one person by another" and that "must guarantee every freedom."

A social system that is sufficiently pervasive and invasive so as to prohibit exploitation and guarantee every freedom is sufficiently strong to guarantee exploitation and prohibit every freedom.

Since, unfortunately, some five percent of humanity are sociopaths and psychopaths, and since (as history tells us) some of these pathological beings will energetically pursue the positions of greatest power and control over their fellow beings, any such social system will almost surely, sooner or later, fall under the control of such beings.

Then, as Kissinger would allegedly say, "Game over!" I dare say he would know about such matters from personal experience.

Delight

13th May 2019, 17:48

Delight

13th May 2019, 18:03

A social system that is sufficiently pervasive and invasive so as to prohibit exploitation and guarantee every freedom is sufficiently strong to guarantee exploitation and prohibit every freedom.

Since, unfortunately, some five percent of humanity are sociopaths and psychopaths, and since (as history tells us) some of these pathological beings will energetically pursue the positions of greatest power and control over their fellow beings, any such social system will almost surely, sooner or later, fall under the control of such beings.

That is what is always happening when an ideal is twisted around. When people are hungry, ignorant, sick and slaving they cannot "rationally" fight the tyranny. Some others acting as bureaucratic slavies believe they have something to gain by maintaining the status quo.

The middle men are selected for willingness to turn in anyone who threatens their "livelihood", their comfie lifestyle. They are so frightened of loss they will never be trust worthy.

Others who start up beautiful and strong are worn down or whacked.

Then when finally it is all too terrible, when the poisons have filled the aether, the rains come down. The REIGNS are snatched by sheer calamity and catastrophe. Maybe this always evens the playing field (willy nilly) when the Civies were too BAD, too STUPID to care about the future of sentient beings.

This is my catastrophe as cleanse belief system... humanoids of various eras pollute the Noosphere and the great "turning of the wheel" in turn wipes us off the face of the planet.

These thoughts make me long for reassurance that some how this is what is supposed to be the case on planet earth.

Delight

13th May 2019, 18:24

Folks--

The United States is a corporation. The states are subsidiary corporations. If you are a member of the corporation by claiming to be a U.S. citizen, you have to abide by the rules the corporation sets.

It's pretty easy to see that the corporation is backing off on the "nice guy" mode of pretending you have a choice to not be vaccinated. It has the final say.

Unless you clarify your status that you are an American State National, you'll be subjected to whatever they say you must do.

For information about getting out of their clutches: http://annavonreitz.com/

Bless us all.

Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

Edit to add: I apologize if there has already been a discussion about what I've just said. I haven't had the time to read the entire thread--or to be on PA much lately (I've missed you!). I just had to add my two cents because I believe my above take on the situation is very important.

I hope you will tell us about how this worked for you. With respect, I am not sure how declaring to be an "American State National" allows me to continue accessing work, school, driver's license, and avoiding vaccination when mandated as pre-requisite to be in public?

In the past I have read about ideas like this but they seem far fetched IMO. I really wish they will work. Others here using the methods successfully?

Delight

13th May 2019, 23:56

Word for word they say the same thing

PennLive.com
Published on Apr 30, 2019
Dr. Rachel Levine, state health secretary, defends vaccinations as safe and effective in the wake of legislation to protect anti-vaxers from discriminatory pediatric denials of care.

9Gu0XSu93ns

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/60170698_10218744527107935_2731847024163946496_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=142500037e1e5e0e9c19f4632f73e56e&oe=5D74622D

ThePythonicCow

14th May 2019, 00:33

These thoughts ...

https://emojis.wiki/emoji-pics/facebook/thumbs-up-facebook.png

Delight

14th May 2019, 02:17

The fears were NOT unfounded. After they came for the parents they ARE coming for the doctors ......

CQsUdtv6chI

GASLIGHT GASLIGHT GASLIGHT

Vaccine opponents tap social media to fight new California exemptions bil
Senate Bill 276 would crack down on suspect medical exemptions
By CAT FERGUSON | cferguson@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: May 13, 2019 at 6:00 am | UPDATED: May 13, 2019 at 1:34 pm
(https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/05/13/vaccine-opponents-tap-social-media-to-fight-new-california-exemptions-bill/)
As state legislators consider a bill to crack down on suspect vaccine exemptions for schoolchildren, a vocal minority on social media is fostering opposition, often by spreading misinformation and sharing referrals to doctors who support their cause.

Senate Bill 276 would prevent doctors from providing medically unnecessary vaccine exemptions to students. But Facebook pages like Californians for Vaccine Choice, followed by over 22,000 people, have been a significant force for amplifying the relatively small minority of parents who oppose vaccine requirements, encouraging activism and posting dubious claims about the bill.

Recent posts have falsely claimed that medical exemptions would only be allowed for kids who had already experienced “severe anaphylaxis” to a specific vaccine and that children in comas would not be exempt.

“Scientific consensus is overwhelming on the issue of vaccines. So how do you foster doubt? One way is to use social media to create the appearance of controversy,” said David Magnus, a professor of pediatrics and director of the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics. “If you get a few crackpots on your side, you can make it seem like there’s a debate.”

Gilda Martinez holds her 6-month-old son, Juan Luis Mendoz, as medical assistant Cinia Martinez gives him a combination vaccine that includes protection from pertussis, at the Marin Community Clinics in San Rafael on Wednesday. (Alan Dep/Marin Independent Journal)
The latest legislative showdown comes amid one of the worst measles outbreaks in the United States since 1994. Californians for Vaccine Choice was one of several social media groups that promoted chartered buses to bring anti-vaccine parents from Southern California to Sacramento for a rally last month. Hundreds of opponents of the bill gathered at the Capitol during a hearing by the Senate Committee on Health. The committee voted 6-2 in favor, despite the crowd.

“We do not believe in forced vaccines. A lot of people agree with us, including all the people who showed up at that hearing,” said Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vaccine nonprofit. “The people are making their voices heard.”

The overall rate of vaccinations among kindergartners increased after the Legislature passed a highly contentious bill in 2015 outlawing personal belief exemptions, but medical exemptions among kindergartners have tripled. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends medical exemptions for a small percentage of children, including those with weakened immune systems or severe allergies to vaccine ingredients.

But experts have linked the rise in medical exemptions in California to doctors who write them for reasons that fall far outside the CDC guidelines — and often for a fee.

SB 276 — co-sponsored by State Sen. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, and State Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego — would require the state Department of Public Health to review and approve doctors’ exemption recommendations. Currently, doctors have wide latitude to write exemptions with no routine oversight.

Shortly after the 2015 bill, SB 277, which Pan also wrote, the names of doctors willing to provide medical exemptions spread widely on social media.

“That’s how people look for a doctor and comparison shop,” said Renée DiResta, co-founder of the vaccine advocacy group Vaccinate California who is also a fellow at Mozilla researching the spread of conspiracy theories and disinformation on social media.

One group, Stop Mandatory Vaccination, used Facebook to promote the services of San Francisco physician Kenneth Stoller, whose practice of providing medical exemptions came under scrutiny last week by the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office.

“He fought against SB 277. He is in the San Francisco Bay area and he can take initial Skype appointments,” the group posted in 2015.

In an interview last week with the Bay Area News Group, Stoller’s attorney Rick Jaffe said many of Stoller’s patients come to him after other doctors rejected their requests for exemptions. “He does screen people out,” Jaffe said. “You can’t get an exemption just because you have a personal belief.”

Pan, who is a pediatrician, insists plenty of doctors cross the line. His office provided screenshots from closed Facebook groups in which parents discussed doctors willing to write medical exemptions: One doctor only required the child’s grandparent to have eczema; another granted temporary exemptions over the phone so kids could quickly enroll in school.

Loe Fisher, the vaccine opponent, said lawmakers who supported SB 277 promised opponents “that doctors would be able to exercise professional judgment and consideration when giving a child a medical exemption.

“If there are doctors doing things untruthfully, they should be looked at one on one.”

Vaccine opponents have also use closed Facebook groups to coordinate efforts to suppress and intimidate vaccine advocates. Physicians posting scientific information about the importance of vaccines, for instance, have had their Yelp and Healthgrades accounts bombarded with negative reviews.

“It’s not just one or two, it’s hundreds of people who go out and harass them,” Pan said. And doctors aren’t the only targets. “Families whose children have passed away from vaccine-preventable illnesses like the flu, they call them names, say the child never existed, just really horrible stuff.”

Doses of the MMR (measles, mumps rubella) vaccine and the Tdap for whooping cough at the Health Care Agency, Orange County in Santa Ana. (File photo by Michael Goulding, Orange County Register/SCNG)
Ethan Lindenberger, an 18-year-old whose parents refused to vaccinate him, has faced the wrath of anti-vaccine groups for speaking out against their tactics. When he went to Washington to testify before Congress, he had to reschedule his travel plans after a Facebook page called VaXism, with more than 100,000 followers, posted a screenshot of his flight and hotel information.

“I got some death threats,” the Ohio teen said in an interview with the Bay Area News Group. He also was harassed after speaking to Twitter executives about his experience. “People were calling me a Nazi, people calling me fascist, saying it was part of a government scheme.”

Related Articles
Bay Area anti-vaccine doctor’s student exemptions under scrutiny
Facebook and other social media sites have pledged to crack down on the spread of misinformation about vaccines. On Thursday, Instagram said it would begin hiding search results for hashtags commonly used to spread anti-vaccine propaganda. However, on Friday, a search for “vaccine” on Instagram still returned primarily anti-vaccine content.
“Social media has created challenges for the medical system that we don’t know how to deal with yet,” said Magnus. “Free speech is obviously very cherished, but to say you can only put out good information instead of trying to create ignorance and foster controversy, I think there’s an argument for that.”

We are expected to accept that the increase is so significant that obviously the exemptions were falsified.

Medical Exemptions Increase After California Passes Vaccine Law
California no longer accepts personal belief exemptions when it comes to vaccines, but it still accepts medical exemptions.
By Hoa Quách, Patch Staff | Oct 29, 2018 (https://patch.com/california/studiocity/medical-exemptions-increase-after-california-passes-vaccine-law)

"However, the rates of medical exemptions in California after the passage of SB277 increased 250% (from 0.2% in 2015–2016 to 0.7% in 2017–2018)," researchers wrote. "Counties that had high PBE
(personal belief exemption) rates before SB277 also had the largest increases in medical exemptions during the first year of SB277 implementation, leaving portions of California susceptible to vaccine-preventable outbreaks."

I am feeling CRAZY but I am not sure what to do? There is no certainty. There is no validation. I hear Ariel (below) say "distinguish between the world of the gaslighter and Your world". We have to keep writing it down. We need to say what needs to be said. That is what IS necessary.

Even if we are threatened with silence.

v4P2Qwh1QCU

Delight

14th May 2019, 04:23

"Who stands to lose....?"

Erin Elizabeth Interview - The Orchestrated Attack On Holistic Doctors And Your Health
The Last American Vagabond
Published on Sep 15, 2018
Anyone who has taken the time to truly research this nation’s history, both recent and back to its origins, should be well aware that those with the wealth have the power to manipulate the government, just as we are increasingly beginning to see today, due in large part to the tireless and all too often unacknowledged efforts of the independent media.

History has shown, in more ways than one, that these ruling elite – or whatever euphemism one feels applies to those with almost no financial limitations and the ability to influence both policy and trade on a massive scale – would have no qualms about choosing their gain over your well-being at every turn. So when we apply that logic to the case at hand, wherein doctors are finding, or rather re-discovering alternative ways to heal and outright prevent a multitude of illnesses that plague mankind, illnesses that have been used to create entire multi-billion dollar industries of continuous treatment as opposed to actual healing, we need to ask ourselves: who stands to lose with this monumental rise in awareness of just how effective holistic medicine can be?

4Jt1tgCUWO8

Unintended Holistic Doctor Death Series: Over 90 Dead
Posted by Erin Elizabeth | Mar 12, 2016 (https://www.healthnutnews.com/recap-on-my-unintended-series-the-holistic-doctor-deaths/)

December 15, 2018
Erin at Health Nut News (https://www.facebook.com/HealthNutNews/videos/vb.139336892748173/2327951083945962/?type=2&theater)
HealthNutNews.com Breaking: Pinterest took my page down forever with thousands of pins (almost all my own) that I worked on for many many years. They also just took down Dr. mercola’s, and national vaccine information center. Here is why they told us they did it. Now, my friend, Michael Archer, famous forensic scientist I did the discovery TV show with, about the doctors, has been banned for sharing this information with others. See screenshots!!

Delight

14th May 2019, 05:16

San Francisco doctor under investigation for allegedly unlawful vaccine exemptions for children
By Michelle Robertson, SFGATE Updated 1:31 pm PDT, Wednesday, May 8, 2019 (https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/kenneth-stoller-vaccines-medical-exemption-13829577.php)

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera is investigating a physician who may have unlawfully provided medical exemptions that allowed parents to avoid vaccinating their children, his office said in a press release Wednesday.

The City Attorney issued a subpoena Wednesday for anonymized records from Dr. Kenneth Stoller, a physician who runs the Azzolino Concussion Clinic in Nob Hill. Stoller earned his degree from the American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine and received a license from the Medical Board of California in 1984, according to records. He is widely quoted on websites and in videos espousing anti-vaccination views.

Between Jan. 1 and May 3, the Center for Disease Control reported 764 individual cases of measles in 23 states — the highest number of measles cases recorded in the U.S. since 1994. Measles was declared eliminated in 2000.

Stoller has 15 days to respond to the subpoena, which seeks medical records to investigate whether Stoller created a "nuisance" — defined as anything injurious to health — by providing medical exemptions to parents of children who did not have legitimate medical conditions that prevent them from getting vaccinated, the press release said.

Rick Jaffe, who is representing Stoller, told SFGATE Wednesday that he doesn't "see how the city of San Francisco has the authority to seek the medical records of patients, whether they're de-identified or other." Jaffe said he is unaware of any precedent in which a medical decision between a physician and patient constitutes a public nuisance.

"I think it's idiotic, and I think it's a political ploy," he said.

Under SB 277, which took effect in California in 2016, students attending any public or private school in California must be vaccinated unless they are provided a medical exemption signed by a physician. Grounds for a medical exemption include undergoing chemotherapy or being allergic to vaccine components. Parents cannot cite religious or personal beliefs as a reason for not vaccinating their children, the law stipulates.

The City Attorney's subpoena also directed Stoller to redact all personal identifying information from the documents that could be used to identify individual patients.

"There are children who have serious medical conditions that prevent them from getting vaccinated," Herrera said in a statement. "The scary thing is those are the kids most at-risk when somebody engages in medical exemption deception.

"If someone uses a medical exemption they don't qualify for and introduces unvaccinated children into that environment, the kids who legitimately can't get a vaccine — and ultimately the general public — are the ones in real danger."

Stoller is an advocate of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, a treatment that delivers oxygen to the body in a pressurized chamber. Its proponents claim the therapy can treat a variety of ailments, including autism, diabetes and cancer, though these claims have not been clinically proven, the Food and Drug Administration warns.

Stoller has also written a series of books, including a memoir chronicling communications with his deceased teenage son and "Incurable Me," which, per its Amazon description, argues that "the best evidence in medical research is not incorporated into clinical practice unless the medical cartel has the potential to make large amounts of money promoting the results of the research."

ABC: San Francisco doctor under investigation for possible unlawful child vaccine exemptions
Posted by Erin Elizabeth | May 11, 2019
(https://www.healthnutnews.com/abc-san-francisco-doctor-under-investigation-for-possible-unlawful-child-vaccine-exemptions/?fbclid=IwAR0iDXvNv0N1pO7nQLJtZtw1fxb7UXK_c4jknUwY9DpCNpVn0QWza1TqRMI)
On Wednesday, the San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera issued a subpoena for the patient medical records of prominent anti-vaccine advocate Dr. Kenneth Stoller. Seems Herrera is worried that Dr. Stoller unlawfully gave medical exemptions to some children. Herrera said, “As a community, we have a responsibility to each other. If someone uses a medical exemption they don’t qualify for and introduces unvaccinated children into that environment, the kids who legitimately can’t get a vaccine – and ultimately the general public – are the ones in real danger.”1

Speaking for Dr. Stoller, his attorney Rick Jaffe said he’s “skeptical” about the city attorney’s legal argument, “We have some questions about how a medical doctor’s practice in making a medical decision could constitute a public a nuisance. I suspect that would be unprecedented.”1

But this is just the kind of thing Dr. Dick Pan is trying to snuff out; he doesn’t want doctors to have the ability to give their patients medical exemptions anymore. And I have a feeling that with the government in his corner, they are going to hound and harass every doctor they can.

LarryCook333
Published on May 30, 2011
http://autismisreversible.info Dr. Kenneth Stoller, MD was trained as a pediatrician at UCLA and was a fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics for two decades. In 2008 he resigned from the AAP after realizing that the AAP has known that mercury in vaccines can cause Autism and other neurological damage, yet the organization has refused to make a determined effort to have mercury (in thimerosal) removed from all vaccines. And in fact, has instead engaged in a cover-up to protect the interests of the vaccine makers and pharmaceutical empires.

INTERVIEWEE
Dr. Kenneth P. Stoller, MD, FACHM
Medical Director
New Hope Clinics
2825 Santa Monica, Boulevard, Ste 310
Santa Monica, CA 90404
310-449-4780
http://www.NewHopeClinicsSantaMonica.com
kpstollermd@aol.com

"...At worst it is an example we have left consensus reality to be created by liars, thieves, cheats, killers and the junk scientists they employ...."

36_qz2beMaE

onawah

14th May 2019, 17:33

Great article!! https://archive.fo/M5HFC#selection-777.1-802.9
posted here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106497-Debunking-Romantic-Ideas-About-the-Past&p=1291420&viewfull=1#post1291420

onawah

14th May 2019, 18:48

People Coerced to Take What Sickened Up to 68% of Study Subjects
What’s the Truth Behind MMR Vaccine Testing?
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 14, 2019

GmFX-iQA2nA

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In 2010, two former Merck employees sued the company, alleging Merck artificially inflated the efficacy of the mumps portion of its MMR II vaccine in testing. To this day, the case is still pending
FDA documents obtained via FOIA requests filed by the Informed Consent Action Network reveal the MMR II vaccine was licensed based on clinical trials involving just 834 children, of which only 342 received the MMR vaccine; results show a shocking amount of vaccine reactions
The eight licensing studies followed up on reactions for a mere 42 days’ post-vaccination, not years, as is done in drug testing. All trials also used other vaccines as controls rather than a placebo, which is not going to give you a valid indication of the vaccine’s safety profile
All eight licensing trials reveal high ratios of gastrointestinal illness and upper respiratory illness occurring within the 42-day follow-up period. In one, 64 of 102 children (62.7%) in the MMR treatment group developed upper respiratory illness and 43 (42%) developed gastrointestinal illness
Anyone in Rockland County with measles is ordered to stay at home, and anyone exposed to measles is barred from entering public spaces or face a $2,000-a-day fine. Students in ZIP codes 10952 and 10977 are also barred from school unless they have a medical or religious exception, or documentation showing they’ve received the MMR vaccine or have immunity against measles, mumps and rubella
The following referenced information contains opinion and perspective on a health topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics that is being discussed in public forums, including in medical, law and other professional journals; newspapers, magazines and other print; broadcast and online media outlets; state legislatures and the U.S. Congress.

Readers are encouraged to go to the websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for the perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for information on vaccine policymaking; to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for information on regulating vaccines for safety and effectiveness; and to National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for information on research and the development of new vaccines.

The World Health Organization has stated that “vaccine hesitancy” is one of the top 10 global public health threats.

April 2, 2018, I posted an article in which I discussed the 2010 lawsuit filed against Merck by two former virologists employed by the company. The whistleblowers claim Merck lied about the effectiveness of the mumps portion of its MMR II (mumps, measles, rubella) vaccine, artificially inflating its efficacy in testing.1,2

For example, the MMR vaccine’s effectiveness was tested against the virus used in the vaccine rather than the natural, wild mumps virus that you’d actually be exposed to in the real world. Animal antibodies were also said to have been added to the test results to give the appearance of a robust immune response.3

While the lawsuit was given the green light to proceed in 2014,4,5 it’s still pending to this day — a remarkable fact considering the call for mandatory MMR vaccination following recent outbreaks of measles. You’d think such a lawsuit would be given at least some measure of consideration.

MMR Vaccine Licensing Tests Revealed Serious Problems
Now, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents6 obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests filed by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) reveal disturbing facts about the 1978 MMR vaccine’s licensing data. According to a May 2, 2019, ICAN press release:7

“[T]he MMR vaccine was licensed based on clinical trials which in total had less than 1,000 [editor’s note: exact total 834] participants and far more adverse reactions than previously acknowledged … The MMR vaccine is at the heart of the vaccine debate. The following are some of the key facts learned from the clinical trial reports produced by the FDA, which the agency relied upon to license the MMR:

There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine
The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection
More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections
All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure
The control group received other vaccines for either rubella or measles and rubella, and none of the controls received a placebo (an inert substance such as a saline injection)”
As noted by ICAN founder Del Bigtree,8 342 children are an “irresponsibly small” test group for a vaccine that will be given to hundreds of millions of children, and far smaller than many other studies showing vaccine harm. Yet the vaccine industry has routinely dismissed such negative studies on the grounds that the studies were too small.

Forty-two days of follow-up is also not long enough to determine its full effects, and testing safety against other vaccines rather than a placebo is not going to give you a valid indication of the vaccine’s safety profile. “Imagine what they might have found had they tracked safety for three years against an appropriate control, like they do for drugs,” Bigtree says.9 Every single trial used another vaccine as the control, either a measles-rubella, rubella-only, or different lots of the MMR itself.

Licensing Studies Reveal Significant Ratios of Vaccine Injuries
Bigtree discusses these FOIA documents in the featured video above, after setting the stage with a discussion about studies linking MMR vaccine to gut dysfunction, which in turn can trigger symptoms of autism spectrum disorder.

At 48 minutes, 20 seconds, he starts reviewing some of the details of the MMR II vaccine trials submitted to the FDA by Merck for licensing purposes. You can view these documents for yourself on icandecide.org.10

In one trial, which included 199 children that received the MMR vaccine, 22 of them developed gastrointestinal illness (which is a common complaint among autistic children) within the 42-day follow-up period. That’s 11%. Twenty-three children (nearly 12%) developed upper respiratory illness. In all, 73 of the 199 children experienced a side effect within the follow-up period.

In another trial, which included just 102 children, 64 of them (62.7%) developed upper respiratory illness, and the data suggest some of these children remained ill throughout the whole follow-up period. Here, 43 out of the 102 children (42%) developed gastrointestinal illness.

A third trial, where just 41 children received the MMR vaccine, 28 (68%) developed upper respiratory illness and 24 (58.5%) developed gastrointestinal illness.

In a trial where one lot of MMR was tested against another lot of MMR as the control, 53 of 117 children (45%) in the test group developed upper respiratory infection and 31 of 117 (26.5%) developed gastrointestinal illness.

In a trial where one lot of MMR was tested against two other lots of MMR, 8 in 20 (40%) developed upper respiratory illness and 4 in 20 (20%) developed gastrointestinal illness.

A third trial with 53 children in which one lot of MMR was tested against two other lots of MMR, 25 (47%) developed upper respiratory illness and 18 (34%) developed gastrointestinal illness. Here, they also included measles-like rash in their side effects list, and 6 of the 53 children had this side effect.

In other words, 11% developed vaccine strain measles. This result flies in the face of claims you cannot contract a type of measles from the vaccine. Fifteen children also developed “nonspecific” rash.

Merck Profits Soar Amid Measles Hysteria
Based on the results from these tests, it seems there’s a clear cause for concern. It also negates claims that the MMR vaccine is perfectly safe and “never” causes harm. Today, we know gastrointestinal problems can have quite serious implications for health, both physically and mentally, and every single one of the licensing trials demonstrated the vaccine causes gastrointestinal harm in a large portion of those vaccinated.

Meanwhile, Merck is now profiting handsomely from the manufactured hysteria over measles and calls for mandatory MMR vaccinations and revaccinations. An April 30, 2019, report by the Associated Press11 notes “surging sales of vaccines” and a new cancer drug “led to a quadrupling of profit at Merck during the first quarter.”

On May 1, CNBC reported12 Merck has increased production of its MMR vaccine “to meet an uptick in demand … in the midst of the country’s biggest outbreak in 25 years.” As of May 3, 2019, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 764 cases of measles in 23 states, the highest case count since 1994.13

“The measles virus is highly contagious and can cause blindness, deafness, brain damage or death. It is currently spreading in outbreaks in many parts of the world,” CNBC writes, adding that:

“Adults in the United States who were vaccinated against measles decades ago may also need a new dose of the vaccine depending on when they received the shot and whether they live in an outbreak zone or plan to travel to one.”

In New York, the MMR vaccine is now also being recommended for Infants as young as 6 months,14 even though the vaccine was not demonstrated to be safe or effective in very young infants before it was licensed and recommended by federal health officials. In the U.S., normally a child would be given the first dose of MMR vaccine between 12 and 15 months old with a booster given at between 4 and 6 years old..

Measles Outbreak, or Clustered MMR Reactions?
As reported by NPR,15 measles outbreaks have been documented in more than a third (actually now nearly half, if you consider the most recent CDC reports) of U.S. states this year, with New York and Washington16 having the highest caseloads. These cases also include children and adults who are fully vaccinated against measles. As reported by CNN:17

“In a video18 posted to YouTube last week, a rabbi in Detroit who said he was ‘fully vaccinated’ nevertheless came down with measles … In another recent case,19 an Israeli flight attendant has been unable to breathe on her own after experiencing a dire complication of measles: inflammation and swelling of the brain, called encephalitis. Health authorities believe she also received a vaccine.”

Less well-publicized is that a portion of measles reported in recently vaccinated persons may in fact be vaccine strain measles, an MMR vaccine side effect that is often misdiagnosed as wild type measles. According to a paper20 published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology in 2017:

“During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences.”

In other words, about 38 percent of suspected measles cases in the 2015 Disneyland measles scare in California were actually vaccine strain measles cases in recently vaccinated persons and not caused by transmission of wild-type measles. A reasonable question then would be: How many of the 704 cases reported in the U.S. so far this year are actually vaccine strain measles, a side effect of MMR vaccine?

Mainstream Media Caught Faking Pictures to Fuel Measles Hysteria
March 26, 2019, the county executive for Rockland County, New York, declared a state of emergency after more than 150 cases of measles had been confirmed since October 2018 and banned unvaccinated children from public places, including schools, restaurants, public transportation, churches and synagogues.21

A lawsuit calling the order “arbitrary and capricious” was filed by civil rights attorney Michael Sussman on behalf of parents of unvaccinated children attending school in Rockland county.

April 5, 2019, New York Supreme Court Judge Rolf Thorsen questioned the county’s definition of “health emergency” and issued an injunction suspending the county’s ban on unvaccinated children appearing in public places.22 That injunction was upheld April 19, 2019, by the state Supreme Court Appellate Division.23

April 25, 2019, Rockland County issued a second emergency order that banned persons with measles or those who had been exposed to measles from entering “indoor or outdoor places of public assembly for a period of up to 21 days.”24 Anyone who fails to comply with the order can be fined $2,000-a-day.

After 285 cases of measles had been confirmed in Brooklyn since September 2018, a similar emergency order was issued by the mayor of New York on April 9 for four neighborhoods (zip codes 11205, 11206, 11211, 11249) barring unvaccinated children and adults living or working in those neighborhoods from entering public places.25

Kings County Supreme Court Judge Lawrence Knipel upheld the mayor’s order April 18, 2019, after dismissing a lawsuit brought on behalf of parents of unvaccinated children attending school in the four targeted zip codes. Knipel quipped, “A fireman need not obtain the informed consent of the owner before extinguishing a house fire. Vaccination is known to extinguish the fire of contagion.”26

As of May 4, 2019, the emergency order is still in effect in New York City. Anyone identified in the targeted four zip codes with measles or the parent of an unvaccinated child who has been exposed to measles could face a $1,000 fine unless they have a medical or religious vaccine exemption or there is evidence of natural measles immunity (assumed for most people born before 1957).27

If this strikes you as excessive, you’re not alone. Mainstream media and public health officials have pushed the “measles emergency” message hard this year. Ironically, they’ve apparently been unable to photograph an active case of measles, as one media outlet after another has been caught publishing fake stock and retouched photos to stoke measles fears.

For example, April 22, 2019, The Clover Chronicle reported “NBC News Caught Faking Photo of Baby Infected With Measles.”28 The photo was in fact a royalty-free stock photo featuring a doctor holding a perfectly healthy newborn baby. The red chicken-foot-shaped splotches were crudely added in Photoshop.

CNN also used a faked measles photo. In this case, they used a 1968 image of a toddler with roseola vaccinia,29 “an extensive eruption which may appear during the second week after primary smallpox vaccination,” according to a paper in JAMA Dermatology.30

CBS News was also caught using an image of a vaccine-injured child.31 The mother, Dawn Neufeld, wife of former NFL player Ryan Neufeld, posted the following comment on Twitter after reading the CBS report in which her son’s image was used:32

“… [T]his is my kid you used in your story without my permission. He does not have the measles. This was his reaction to the MMR shot. Take it down. Now. Issue a retraction. It’s much easier than having to litigate a defamation case. I’ll wait.”

One of the Neufeld’s two children was diagnosed with autism at age 3, and the couple has become active in the autism community.33 In an August 14, 2012, Twitter post, Dawn Neufeld said, “I am pro-safe vaccine but we now also vaccinate on a delayed schedule after watching Will spiral into autism after his 12-month shots.”34

It’s hard to miss the irony that CBS used an image of a child having a reaction to the MMR vaccine to scare people about the possibility of measles. CBS eventually issued a correction to its article, stating that “Due to an editing error, the child was misidentified in the caption as having measles.” No apology, however, was issued for snatching the private photo from Neufeld’s social media account and using it without permission or attribution. As noted by The Free Thought Project:35

“Even if it was an honest mistake, the case is made to show the lack of credibility these institutions have when calling for the silencing of those who do nothing other than question the safety of vaccines.

As Amazon purges books and films on vaccine information and as politicians literally beg for pro-safe vaccine folks to be silenced, examples like this prove that those who wish to control the flow of information and take away your right to ask questions, are not always right — a telling notion indeed.”

Countering Measles Myths Perpetuated by Mainstream Media
The media have also been lax in their reporting on other measles-related facts, as demonstrated in a recent article36 by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson. In “Measles: Facts and Misconceptions in a Near-Hysterical Media Environment,” she breaks down commonly repeated statements and corrects them according to CDC data and other scientific evidence. Among them:

“7. ‘Measles is a highly dangerous disease for many in the U.S. … false, according to various experts. While measles can be miserable and — rarely — dangerous or deadly for the immune-suppressed or chronically ill, it was once treated as a routine childhood rite of passage in the U.S. and considered by scientists to be a ‘mild disease.’

Most people who catch measles in the U.S. will emerge with no longlasting effects and will have a lifelong immunity, according to scientists. There has been one measles-related death in the U.S. in the past decade, according to CDC. The death was that of a woman in Washington state who died in 2015. CDC did not have other details.

News reports indicate the patient may have been vaccinated and had no obvious symptoms of measles, but was tested after she passed away. She ‘died of pneumonia, had other health conditions and was taking medications that suppressed her immune system,’ said state health officials.

There have been three measles-related deaths in the U.S. since 2000. Two of them were in patients with serious underlying health conditions prior to the measles infection, according to health officials. One of them was a 13-year old who had recently had a bone marrow transplant for chronic granulomatous disease.

According to CDC, the patient ‘received a bone marrow transplant in October 2002, and died in January 2003. Measles was confirmed [after death] by a positive serologic test for measles IgM and isolation of measles virus from a brain biopsy.’

A second 2003 measles-related death happened to a 75 year old international traveler who was infected in Israel and got ‘measles pneumonitis and encephalopathy. Measles was confirmed by reverse transciptase-polymerase chain reaction from nasopharyngeal swab and urine,’ according to CDC.

On the other hand, there have been 483 measles vaccine injury and death claims paid by the U.S. government since 1988.”

A Rabbi’s Views on Measles
AwK91UNlG0E

In the video above, a Brooklyn-based rabbi discusses his viewpoints on measles and the MMR vaccine.

“It’s called disease-mongering,” rabbi Handler says, “Using fear tactics; that’s standard procedure, recommended by the CDC at their seminars for the various health departments …

What’s happening right now is a very concerning development. In the 1950s, doctors recommended children should get the measles and chickenpox … It’s safe, it’s a childhood disease; it’s not ebola, it’s not the black plague … And then they have lifetime immunity.

However, in 1963 when Merck invented the measles vaccine, they used the typical fear tactics. They exaggerated the dangers of measles, which in an advanced country like the United States … where there is proper nutrition and sanitation, proper sewage disposal, Harvard University has shown that 97% of the deaths have been reduced because of these simple techniques.”

He goes on to recount a quick history of the introduction of the measles vaccine. How initially it was said getting vaccinated would confer the same benefits as getting the measles — lifetime immunity. However, it soon became apparent vaccine-induced immunity did not last.

Indeed, in 1986, public health officials stated that MMR vaccination rates for kindergarten children were in excess of 95 percent and that one dose of live attenuated MMR would eliminate these three childhood diseases (measles, mumps and rubella) in the U.S.37 Just three years later, parents were informed that a single dose of MMR vaccine was inadequate for providing lifelong protection against these common childhood diseases and that children would need to get a second dose of MMR.38

Today, 94.3% of children entering kindergarten39 have received two doses of MMR vaccine, as have 92 percent of school children ages 13 to 17 years.40 In some states, the MMR vaccination rate is approaching 100 percent.41

Yet despite achieving the sought-for MMR vaccination rate for more than three decades, which theoretically should ensure “herd immunity,” outbreaks of both measles and mumps keep occurring — and many of those who get sick are children and adults who have been vaccinated.

“Now we have a situation where instead of getting measles at a safe age, at 5 years old, they suppressed it, and now, children 20 years old are getting it; grownups are getting measles,” rabbi Handler says.

“Even more dangerous, babies under 1 year of age [are getting it], because the mothers are not lifetime protected. They got the vaccine. [In the past] the mother’s milk used to carry over the immunity to the baby …

But rather than admitting the vaccine is a flop and a failure, and [is] dangerous, they’re doubling down saying we have to get more vaccines. They’re using the argument that people are getting hurt as an argument to give more vaccines, instead of going back to where it was the 50s …

Another big, criminal omission of the media is that they are not taking care of the people who are getting the measles … who need to know the truth, that in order to reduce the symptoms … they need to take massive amounts of vitamin A, which is proven to cut down the problem [by] 50%.

[Also] be careful not to take Tylenol to reduce fever, because that fever gets rid of the measles faster … And good hydration. That’s what’s really needed. The doctors and the media are criminally negligent just pushing shots, shots, shots and not helping people to get through it safely.”

Why We Have to Keep Fighting for Medical Freedom and the Right to Choose
Indeed, as noted by National Vaccine Information Center cofounder Barbara Loe Fisher in “Taking No Prisoners in the Vaccine Culture War,” the vaccine industry is looking to shut down the public conversation about health and vaccination, and is lobbying for government mandates to force every child and adult to use every vaccine recommended by government health officials.

Forced use of MMR vaccine is just one vaccine in a long list of current and future vaccines you and your children will be mandated to get if things keep going the way they are going.

Drug companies are fast tracking more than a dozen new “priority” vaccines for children, pregnant women and adults, including respiratory syncytial virus, streptococcus A and B, HIV, herpes simplex virus, gonorrhea, E-coli, Shigella, Salmonella, tuberculosis, malaria and more, and industry will likely lobby governments to mandate all of them.

This is why we cannot be complacent and ignore calls for punishment of those who make an informed decision not to use MMR vaccine for health or personal belief reasons. Once we lose the legal right to opt out of using one vaccine, we’ll rapidly lose the right to opt out of any of them.

Last but not least, it’s important to realize that most of the parents who are speaking out about vaccine risks are not “anti-vaxxers.” Quite the contrary! They often call themselves “ex-vaxxers” because they followed the CDC’s vaccine recommendations and their healthy children were harmed in the process and became chronically ill or disabled.

Like any rational person, once they learn more about vaccine risks they were not told about, they’re fighting to prevent the same devastation from happening to others and we should all be grateful for their public service.

“Vaccine hesitancy” is not the result of exposure to information critical of vaccines; in most cases, it’s born from personal experience with vaccine injuries.

xEcYQydhY9E

Protect Your Right To Informed Consent and Defend Vaccine Exemptions
With all the uncertainty surrounding the safety and efficacy of vaccines, it's critical to protect your right to make independent health choices and exercise voluntary informed consent to vaccination. It is urgent that everyone in America stand up and fight to protect and expand vaccine informed consent protections in state public health and employment laws. The best way to do this is to get personally involved with your state legislators and educating the leaders in your community.

NVIC Advocacy poster

Think Globally, Act Locally.
National vaccine policy recommendations are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being threatened by lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations, and public health officials, who are trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws.

Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state legislators on your smart phone or computer so you can make your voice heard. You will be kept up to date on the latest state bills threatening your vaccine choice rights and get practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community.

Also, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up to date information and call to action items you need at your fingertips. So please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN! https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx

Share Your Story With the Media and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury, or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up. Write a letter to the editor if you have a different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local newspaper. Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only presenting one side of the vaccine story.

I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not back down. Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true about vaccination, will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations funded by drug companies or public health officials promoting forced use of a growing list of vaccines to dominate the conversation about vaccination.

The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead of human beings.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the non-profit charity, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org:

NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims — View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries, and deaths. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here.
If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions — Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries.
Vaccine Freedom Wall — View or post descriptions of harassment and sanctions by doctors, employers, and school and health officials for making independent vaccine choices.
Vaccine Failure Wall — View or post descriptions about vaccines that have failed to work and protect the vaccinated from disease.
Connect With Your Doctor or Find a New One That Will Listen and Care
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and vaccination. However, there is hope.

At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents.

It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.

So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect, and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child. "
Sources and References
1 AHRP.org, Former Merck Scientists Sue Merck
2 Courthouse News Service June 27, 2012
3 Jon Rappaport April 24, 2017
4 Case 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ Document 61 Filed 09/05/14 (PDF)
5 Wall Street Journal September 10, 2014
6, 10 Icandecide.org Documents obtained via FOIA from FDA
7, 8, 9 PR Newswire May 2, 2019
11 Associated Press April 30, 2019
12 CNBC May 1, 2019
13 CDC.gov Measles Cases in 2019
14 The Verge May 1, 2019
15 NPR April 29, 2019
16 CNN January 29, 2019
17 CNN April 26, 2019
18 Youtube.com Detroit’s Measles Message April 11, 2019
19 CNN April 17, 2019
20 Journal of Clinical Microbiology DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01879-16
21 Rockland County, New York Press Release March 26, 2019.
22 Associated Press. April 5, 2019
23 Westchester Rockland Journal News. April 19, 2019.
24 Rockland County, New York Press Release April 25, 2019.
25 Newsday. April 9, 2019
26 The Jurist. April 19, 2019
27 New York City Health Department. April 29, 2019.
28 The Clover Chronicle April 22, 2019
29 Vaxopedia.org February 1, 2019
30 JAMA Dermatology April 1968 1968;97(4):422-424
31, 35 Thefreethoughtproject.com April 11, 2019
32 Twitter Dawn Neufeld April 9, 2019
33 LeanGreenDads, Ryan Neufeld Tackles Autism
34 Twitter Dawn Neufeld August 14, 2012
36 Sharylattkisson.com April 30, 2019
37 Bart KJ. Dev Biol Stand 1986; 65: 45-52.
38 Pediatrics December 1989
40 CDC MMWR July 25, 2015; 63(29): 625-633
41 CDC MMWR October 17, 2014; 63(4): 913-920. (HI, MI, NC, UT)

onawah

14th May 2019, 20:30

MAY 14, 2019
Millennials Besieged by Chronic Illness: From Age 27, It’s All “Downhill”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/childrens-health/millennials-besieged-by-chronic-illness-from-age-27-its-all-downhill/?utm_source=mailchimp
(If millennials are besieged, what do the newest generations have in store? Although vaccines are just one part of the problem, they are most definitely a BIG PART...)

By the Children’s Health Defense Team

"NOTE: There can be no denying that America’s children and young adults are at a critical juncture. Unless we start admitting what we already know about environmental culprits and become willing to do something about them, children, young adults and our nation are going to continue to get short-changed.

Millennials (the generation born between the early 1980s and approximately the mid-1990s) just got some bad news. Health insurance data from 2017 show that many of them, especially older millennials in their mid-30s, are facing unprecedented levels of mental and physical illness.

…over half (54%) of millennial respondents reported having been diagnosed with at least one chronic illness.
According to a report released in April by the Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) Association, millennials’ sharp decline in health begins around the tender age of 27 and stands in stark contrast to the health of the preceding generation—Generation X, born in the mid-1960s. For eight of 10 health conditions, millennials are experiencing double-digit increases in prevalence compared to what Gen Xers experienced at the same ages. Although four out of five millennials, ironically, perceive themselves to be in “good” or “excellent” health, both the BCBS report and a 2016 Harris Poll survey put the lie to these perceptions. In the survey, over half (54%) of millennial respondents reported having been diagnosed with at least one chronic illness.

Interestingly, a national survey of children’s health conducted in 2007 produced exactly the same result as the Harris Poll for children ages 0-17: 54% of surveyed children had one or more chronic health conditions. The preteens and teens who participated in the 2007 survey fall squarely into the millennial time frame and would have been in their 20s when BCBS conducted its 2017 analysis. For anyone following America’s dismal child health trends over time, the news about millennials’ health can hardly come as a surprise.

Sick working-age Americans
BCBS analyzed data for 55 million commercially insured millennials—representing about 75% of all millennials in the United States. Using a measurement tool called the BCBS Health Index, BCBS considered the “reduction in future healthy years” due to various chronic health conditions.

In addition to highlighting the strikingly poorer health of millennials compared to Gen Xers, the BCBS report noted the following:

Of the top 10 health problems affecting millennials, six are behavioral and mental health conditions (major depression, psychotic conditions, substance/alcohol/tobacco use disorders and hyperactivity) and four are physical conditions (hypertension, high cholesterol, Crohn’s disease/ulcerative colitis and type II diabetes). Behavioral health conditions affect millennials more than the U.S. population as a whole.
Looking at the three-year period between 2014 and 2017, BCBS found that nearly all of the health conditions became more prevalent—especially major depression and hyperactivity, both of which increased by roughly 30% in just three years.
Among those diagnosed with major depression, 85% had one or more additional health conditions.
Another BCBS report (released in May 2018) examined major depression in millennials and adolescents. That study, which described major depression as “the second most impactful condition on overall health for commercially insured Americans,” reported a 47% increase in depression diagnoses in millennials and a whopping 63% increase in adolescents—especially teenage girls—from 2013 to 2016. Among those diagnosed with major depression, 85% had one or more additional health conditions.

Although the BCBS report on millennials does not specifically mention anxiety disorders, the 2016 Harris Poll survey found that anxiety disorders were one of the three most common diagnoses among millennials. Fourteen percent reported an anxiety disorder diagnosis in that survey, and nearly one-fourth (23%) reported being diagnosed with any mental illness. In fact, anxiety is a prominent enough affliction for this generation that some writers have half seriously proposed renaming millennials as “Generation Anxious.”

According to BCBS, millennials’ health status will likely have substantial effects on the American economy over the next two decades—including workplace productivity and healthcare costs.
Personal and societal implications
The BCBS report focuses on the impending macroeconomic impact of millennials’ declining health, pointing out that they will soon be the largest generation in the American workforce. According to BCBS, millennials’ health status “will likely have substantial effects on the American economy over the next two decades—including workplace productivity and healthcare costs.”

Equally sobering are the individual financial and quality-of-life implications of so much chronic illness at such young ages. For example, millennials carry more medical debt than older Americans “and incur it more frequently.” A news account discussing millennials’ escalating rates of formerly rare illnesses such as colorectal cancer and multiple sclerosis describes the phenomenon as “life interrupted”:

Life in your 20s and 30s is challenging enough with forging career paths, buying your first home, falling in love and deciding if you want to start a family without adding a chronic health condition to the mix. Unfortunately, there is a growing number of millennials whose lives are interrupted by chronic illness.

Other environmental factors, such as the ubiquity of glyphosate in food, air, water (and vaccines) and young people’s immersion in a wireless-saturated environment also merit close attention and an immediate response.
What is BCBS’s proposed response to the millennial health crisis? The insurer plans to conduct “Millennial Health Listening Sessions” to identify health care system fixes. A more necessary first step, however, is to call out the environmental factors that are undoubtedly at the root of the several-decades-old children’s health crisis that is now unfurling into young adulthood.

Vaccines represent one group of obvious suspects, particularly if one recognizes that the millennial generation’s arrival on the scene roughly coincided with the end of manufacturer liability for childhood vaccine injuries and the beginning of the rush to pile ever-more vaccines onto the childhood schedule. Other environmental factors, such as the ubiquity of glyphosate in food, air, water (and vaccines) and young people’s immersion in a wireless-saturated environment also merit close attention and an immediate response.

There can be no denying that America’s children and young adults are at a critical juncture. Unless we start admitting what we already know about environmental culprits and become willing to do something about them, children, young adults and our nation are going to continue to get short-changed."

onawah

14th May 2019, 22:13

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. BREAKS HIS SILENCE TODAY
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Published on May 14, 2019

( I hope some day soon it will be safe to say "I AM anti-vaccine", and the evidence that vaccines were NEVER safe or based on sound science will be disputed no more.)

"The leading environmental activist speaks out in NY after recent attacks from mainstream media on his family."
hMH6hfwp__8

Press Release (from yesterday): https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-speak-at-rallies-in-ny-and-nj-concerning-mandatory-vaccines-and-government-overreach-300848635.html

Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ChildrensHealthDefense/posts/2331234170457324?__tn__=-R

Delight

15th May 2019, 03:33

While Maine eliminated religious exemption, Oregon push back managed to convince the Republican legislators to side with what I think is the right side of history. But I hear that this is only a temporary victory.

Breaking News: Oregon Mandatory Vaccination Bill 3063 Dead
May 14,2019 (https://www.ageofautism.com/)

This is how politics works. Deals. Behind the scenes. Out front. Make no mistake, the arduous work of demonstrators who fought against the removal of vaccine exemptions is making a difference. Politicians pick their battles wisely, even in the face of lobbyists. A wary congratulations to Oregon, a very different part of the country from New York and Connecticut. Stay tuned.

From WWeek.org in Oregon.

Multiple sources tell WW that Oregon Senate Democrats have reached a deal with Senate Republicans that will bring the minority party back to the Legislature after nearly a week on the lam.

Democrats have reportedly agreed to kill two bills that Republicans dislike: Senate Bill 978, which strengthens gun laws and House Bill 3063, which ends non-medical exemptions for families who choose not to vaccinate their children.

Also, from the Lund Report: Breaking News: In Salem, Democrats Will Scrap Controversial Vaccine Bill to Appease Republicans

SALEM – In a dramatic turn of events, Senate Democrats agreed Monday to kill a mandatory school vaccination bill that would have given Oregon some of the country's strictest child vaccination laws.

Democrats agreed to scuttle House Bill 3063 as part of a deal to bring Republicans back to the Capitol, several Democrats in the Senate and House confirmed to The Lund Report on Monday, a week after Republicans fled Salem to deny Democrats a quorum in protest of a $2 billion tax package for schools.

The deal, which would also shelve a series of firearm regulations, was first reported by Willamette Week. It marks a sudden and stunning end to House Bill 3063, which would have removed non-medical exemptions for children to attend public and private schools, or licensed daycare facilities.

Posted by Age of Autism on May 13, 2019 at 09:50 PM in Current Affairs

Thanks to Natalie for posting kennedy's great speech at this rally in Albany.

RwuMX-zw5oo

Delight

15th May 2019, 20:40

Del Bigtree's history informed his choices and attitude. Maybe some of us are not SELFISH at all but actually aware of a Bigger Picture.

8_8XarzTBRc

Q38VP4Z03Jo

No choice is allowable and these good citizens know that fact....

hXBxw_wwsAQ

The conversation above is in response of UK's plan to have compulsory vaccination.

jSh2dwYW12g

This has been tried before. In 2009, a cogent response to the plan came from a GP:

Advice On How To Stand Up For Your Rights From Dr. Mansfield, GP

Former British Medical Association chairman Sir Sandy Macara has called for children to be excluded from school this week unless they’ve have the MMR jab. Dr Peter Mansfield takes umbrage.

Although the Department of Health continues publicly to assert that vaccines should remain a voluntary option, the BMA this week debates a proposal to make MMR compulsory.

Kites like this have been flown before, but it distresses me that any doctor would ever entertain such an idea. To impose by law upon a perfectly healthy child a vaccine which carries a small but real risk of harm, against a disease which a healthy child will ride out perfectly well, is negligence of the duty of care. The effect, across a population, is bound to include a number of adverse reactions which may or may not clear up.

Furthermore, to impose simultaneously three live vaccines representing diseases that can never naturally co-habit the same body, is to raise the bar unnecessarily and unacceptably. The combination is less efficient and requires two doses at least, whereas given singly one of each provides reliable protection for 1-2 decades.

As if this were not enough, it is inappropriate to the point of negligence to impose vaccines against rubella and mumps a full decade before these diseases pose any threat, and deprive the victim of an opportunity of life-long protection from harmless natural infection at a safe age (before the onset of puberty).

It is just as extraordinary that the public has not risen in outrage against these monstrous arrangements, even when technically optional. Pressure to accept has been relentless, for decades. The supine acceptance by our public health officials of whatever the vaccine manufacturers wish to sell has been a scandal since the mid 1980s.

If no robust objections are registered against what is happening by a sufficient proportion of the public, then we shall get whatever the power-that-be want us to have. And it will be no more than we deserve.

MPs – particularly now – reckon one personally written letter expressing a strong opinion on any subject is worth about 250 votes. Write to yours, and tell him what you think. Tell him or her the Department of Health agenda is bogus and contrary to the interests of healthy children.

Assert that if vaccines become compulsory, so must state-funded vaccine damage compensation.

The truth is we have been running on good home hygiene and decent nourishment for the past century. If you are prepared to put in those vital assets, nobody has the right to insist you take part in measures that insult your intelligence, cannot help your child’s health and may conceivably harm it.

Dr. Mansfield.

Source: www.thestirrer.co.uk, 5th June 2009.

Delight

15th May 2019, 22:44

Tuesday, 07 May 2019
Forced Vaccinations: Is It Time for Big Brother to Become Your Doctor?
Written by Rebecca Terrell
(https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/32100-forced-vaccinations)

Claiming vaccines are safe and diseases they prevent are killers, government pushes immunization mandates.

Anti-vaxxer — an ugly word akin to genocidal Nazi or child-sacrificing Aztec. If so labeled, you are guilty as charged, prepared to slaughter children and endanger society for a silly, outdated idea of personal liberty in defiance of established science and basic human rights.

“This isn’t just a public health crisis. It’s a public sanity one,” writes New York Times opinion columnist Frank Bruni. “The anti-vaccine crowd … aren’t trafficking in anything concrete, mundane and quaint as facts. They’re not really engaged in a debate about medicine. They’re immersed in a world of conspiracies, in the dark shadows where no data can be trusted, nothing is what it seems, and those who buy the party line are pitiable sheep.”

Recent measles outbreaks across the United States — 555 cases in 20 states confirmed as of April 11 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — have ignited extreme reactions from government officials. In January, Washington governor Jay Inslee declared a public health emergency citing 31 cases in two counties. In March the top official of Rockland County, New York, banned children unvaccinated against measles from public places for 30 days, warning that parents who ignore the ban could be subject to both fines and jail time.

A judge subsequently lifted that ban, saying the number of cases did not meet the legal requirement for an emergency declaration. That didn’t stop New York’s Mayor Bill de Blasio, who ordered mandatory vaccinations for certain affected areas of the city, targeting the orthodox Jewish community of Williamsburg in Brooklyn, a neighborhood with a high percentage of unvaccinated families. “We cannot allow this dangerous disease to make a comeback here in New York City,” de Blasio lamented at a press conference. “We have to stop it now.” So he’s slapping a misdemeanor charge and a $1,000 fine on anyone who refuses the measles vaccine, glibly stating: “The faster everyone heeds the order, the faster we can lift it.” In a WCBS news radio interview about a lawsuit against his edict filed by the Hasidic Jewish community days later, de Blasio rebuffed the parents’ concerns and bragged, “We will beat them.”

Implying that victims are dropping like flies and that measles will soon decimate entire cities without extreme, protective countermeasures, news outlets fail to mention that most cases are not severe. On the contrary, media opportunists feed the flames. The Bloomberg editorial board hopes that these outbreaks “may finally be scaring sense” into parents who believe the “myths” that vaccines may cause “seizures, autism, mercury poisoning or death.” And in a fit of yellow journalism at its finest, a CBS affiliate in Texas featured an alarming picture of a baby supposedly suffering from measles, when in fact the child was injured by the measles vaccine. CBS “decided to use my kid as the poster child for the measles outbreak,” writes mom Dawn Neufeld on her Facebook page. “But the irony … Will doesn’t have measles in this picture; this is the reaction he had to taking the ‘safe’ MMR shot.”

Nevertheless, the witch hunt is on. Writing for Fatherly Magazine, Patrick Coleman calls for the arrest of “anti-vaxxers spreading measles,” claiming that “there are laws and precedent to prosecute.” He points out that federal law allows forced quarantines of those with certain communicable diseases, and nine states allow fines and criminal prosecution for spreading infectious disease. Certain European countries already fine parents for refusing to have their children immunized.

Reporters such as these lay blame at the doorstep of parents, but can they rightly assume unvaccinated children always cause outbreaks? A fully vaccinated 22-year-old woman sparked the 2011 measles epidemic in New York. A 1985 epidemic struck a fully immunized school in Corpus Christi, Texas. CDC researchers linked the 2014 spate of Disneyland measles to an outbreak in the Philippines that year, likely brought to the United States by an infected traveler. Some people even get measles from the vaccine, as CNN reported in March of one-year-old Elsie Mendoza. After her first dose of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, she spiked a fever, developed a full body rash, and had three visits to urgent care before doctors finally admitted the vaccine was the likely culprit.

Media also note that the federal government declared measles eliminated from the United States in 2000, giving the impression that anti-vaxxers have ruined our record. In reality, the CDC reported 86 cases nationwide in 2000 and more than 100 the following year. (The agency defines an “outbreak” as three or more infections and “elimination” as “absence of continuous measles transmission for greater than 12 months.” The CDC also blames most outbreaks on infected travelers bringing the virus with them from abroad.) Well more than 100 confirmed U.S. cases are recorded most years since 2008, and in 2014 there were 667. Interestingly, from 2003 until 2015 there were no deaths from measles, but over that same period the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) linked the deaths of more than 100 children to the measles vaccine, which contains a live virus.

With that in mind, what are we to think of media insistence that vaccines are effective and harmless? Should we demonize — even fine and jail — parents who opt for natural over artificial immunity for their children?

Safe and Effective?

All drugs have side effects, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires manufacturers to list them, along with a host of other disclaimers and clinical trial results, in product packaging literature. Vaccines are no exception.

Let’s use the popular Merck & Co. MMR II vaccine as an example. “As for any vaccine, vaccination with M-M-R II may not result in protection in 100% of vaccinees,” states the package insert. This disclaimer seems to belie universal insistence of the drug’s effectiveness. How do you explain it?

“An ‘effective vaccine’ as defined by researchers, is one that leads to the development of antibodies after it has been injected into the bloodstream,” explains Dr. Sherry Tenpenny of NMA Media Press. “It is important to understand that effective and protective in vaccine research are not synonyms.” In other words, vaccines cause the patient to produce antibodies (effective) but cannot guarantee protection from disease (protective). That explains why kids who get their shots still contract infections.

But what about herd immunity — a dearth of contagious disease resulting when a significantly large portion of a population is immunized? Haven’t measles deaths nose-dived since 1963 when the vaccine was introduced? In reality, that tailspin occurred in the pre-vaccine era. According to U.S. Vital Statistics, until 1920, more than 10 deaths resulted for every 100,000 measles cases, a rate of 0.01 percent. By 1955, the rate had plunged to 0.00003 percent, or 0.03 deaths per 100,000.

What caused the precipitous decline? By the 1920s, doctors had discovered the efficacy of cod liver oil against viruses such as measles, mumps, and chickenpox. Until the 1960s, moms regularly dosed their reluctant children with the foul-tasting liquid. Since then the practice has given way to vaccines, but the New England Journal of Medicine confirmed in 1990 that vitamin A — a main ingredient in cod liver oil — is essential in measles treatment, finding that patients supplemented with it have fewer and less severe symptoms, recover more quickly, require less hospital time, and have lower mortality. Physicians for Informed Consent explains that most measles-related morbidity and mortality worldwide involve vitamin A deficiency.

Regarding the safety of vaccines, they are no different from any other FDA-approved medication, all of which carry risks. Again using Merck’s MMR II vaccine as an example, adverse reactions observed in clinical trials include both mild (e.g., fever, headache, dizziness, diarrhea, vomiting) and severe effects (e.g., diabetes mellitus, arthritis, encephalitis, meningitis, pneumonia, and anaphylaxis — an acute, sometimes deadly, allergic reaction).

The CDC assures us that our country “has the safest, most effective vaccine supply in its history” and that severe reactions are rare, “occurring at a rate of one per million doses for many vaccines.” Yet consider this list compiled by Dr. Jane Orient of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a private organization representing thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide:

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market [in the 1990s], a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage.

We could add to this list products such as the Rotashield rotavirus vaccine, withdrawn only one year after FDA approval because of so many severe reactions in children, including the death of a five-month-old infant. There was also LYMErix, a vaccine for Lyme disease, which lasted less than four years before class-action lawsuits linking it to rheumatoid arthritis forced it off the market.

This is not to say that no one should be vaccinated. The point is that, despite media insistence that vaccines are safe, they really are no different from any other prescription drug — all of them present risks. But they are different from most other medications because we have no way of knowing how safe or dangerous they are. “There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out” complications, notes Orient. A 2012 review by the medical research organization Cochrane concluded: “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate.” Regarding vaccines in general, economist Gayle DeLong of Baruch College wrote in the journal Accountability in Research: “No study of the safety of the entire U.S. vaccine schedule has ever been undertaken. That is, the safety of the combination of vaccines is unknown.”

Manufacturer Immunity

Vaccine manufacturers have no incentive to research further because the federal government protects them from virtually all liability when their products injure or kill patients. In 1986, Congress established the taxpayer-funded National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). NVICP has since paid out nearly $4.1 billion in claims. Instead of suing the companies that produce and sell these potentially dangerous products in civil court, vaccine-injured victims and their families are forced to petition HHS in a process that disillusioned claimants have discovered to be heavily weighted against them. The non-profit Children’s Health Defense tells the sad tale:

HHS has turned a basic administrative compensation process into a “highly adversarial, lengthy, expensive, traumatic and unfair imitation of a court trial for vaccine victims and their attorneys,” charges Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center, who was instrumental in drafting the original law. She is not alone. Even the program’s former Chief Special Master, Gary Golkiewicz, said the government “altered the game so that it’s clearly in their favor. (The government) has a vested interest in vaccines being good. It doesn’t take a mental giant to see the fundamental unfairness in this.”

Unfairness is putting it mildly; draconian is more apt. Petitioners have a mere three years to file post-injury, and HHS recognizes only certain possible adverse outcomes listed on its “Vaccine Injury Table,” which has been updated just twice since 1986 when children generally received seven vaccines. (There are 16 recommended by CDC now in a total of 70 doses.) The first update applied to only one vaccine — hepatitis B — and the second involved removal of some previously listed injuries.

Notably absent from the table is autism, which many physicians link to thimerosal, a mercury preservative used in several vaccines, including MMR. CDC claims no causal link due in part to the study it commissioned in 2000 to evaluate the issue. Records of the research committee’s preliminary discussions relate that the chairman, Dr. Marie McCormick, acknowledged that the CDC “wants us to declare” vaccines safe, and she blatantly admitted, “We are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect.”

In fact, no CDC-sponsored research finds a link between vaccines and autism, but the agency is plagued with conflict-of-interest charges in relation to those studies. Highlighting the story of CDC researcher-turned-whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, the 2016 documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe exposes conspiracy within the agency to destroy evidence linking autism to the MMR vaccine. Where is the incentive for the CDC to admit a decades-long error? Interestingly, thimerosal content has recently been reduced or eliminated in some vaccines. Based on the number of autism claims filed through December 2011 with NVICP, DeLong estimated they would have cost taxpayers an additional $4.6 billion in payouts.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) says 75 percent of NVICP cases are dismissed. HHS calculates a slightly higher number it has compensated — 31 percent of more than 20,000 petitions filed since 1988. It estimates that “for every 1 million doses of vaccine that were distributed, 1 individual was compensated,” but it fails to relate how heavily the cards are stacked in its favor.

Perhaps a better litmus test is VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. VAERS receives approximately 30,000 reports of vaccine-related adverse events annually, but because it is a passive reporting system, experts estimate as much as 10-fold under-reporting. Based on these statistics, “anywhere from 4,500 to perhaps 45,000 serious vaccine injuries occur every year in the United States,” says CHD, “including brain damage, seizure disorders, chronic arthritis, neurodevelopmental disorders,” and death.

Yet state governments require parents to have their children vaccinated. Though there is not yet a federal mandate, all 50 states require certain vaccinations for school attendance, with limited options for medical, religious, and philosophical exemptions. In the case of other drugs and medical procedures, patients have the right of full disclosure regarding risks and benefits, and the subsequent right to accept or reject them. In regard to vaccines, patient rights are thrown to the wind, destroying the doctor-patient relationship, allowing government to usurp the physician’s role and effectively practice medicine without a license.

“Intimately personal medical decisions should not be made by government,” stated Ron Paul, M.D., former U.S. Representative (R-Texas), in a 2011 article entitled Government Vaccines — Bad Policy, Bad Medicine. “Freedom over one’s physical person is the most basic freedom of all…. When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we in essence accept that the state owns our bodies.”

Vested Interests

What is behind government’s seemingly fanatic obsession? Does the state want to “own your body”? Or could it be a classic case of “follow the money”? Golkiewicz cited government’s “vested interest in vaccines.” Orient also mentioned “enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.”

One example is detailed in a 2000 U.S. House Majority Staff Report, “Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making.” It recounts the rise and fall of Rotashield, approved in 1998 against rotavirus and pulled in 1999 after an infant died and many other children suffered severe injury. The chair of the advisory board that approved Rotashield, Dr. Patricia Ferrieri, owned $20,000 of stock in vaccine manufacturer Merck, and was subsequently awarded a federal grant of $135,000 for rotavirus research. Another advisory committee member, Dr. Caroline Hall, worked for the University of Rochester, which had a $9.5 million contract with the federal government for vaccine development. Yet another advisor, Dr. Kathryn Edwards, held numerous government grants and private contracts for vaccine studies, totaling more than $6.8 million from 1996 through 2003. Dr. Mary Estes, also on the advisory committee, worked for Baylor College of Medicine and was the principal investigator for a grant from Merck for rotavirus vaccine development. Her employer was also receiving hundreds of thousands of private and federal grant dollars for vaccine research.

This is only a partial list. The House report concluded that more than half the individuals responsible for Rotashield approval had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine. Moreover, it found that these advisory board members routinely obtained waivers from conflict-of-interest rules; those who were not allowed to vote were still given full voice in committee deliberations.

This is just the case of one vaccine. DeLong found vaccine safety research clouded with conflicts of interest. Though she acknowledged that independent advocacy groups, skeptical of vaccines, are certainly interested in exposing their dangers, “These organizations are not as well-staffed or well-funded as government agencies or vaccine manufacturers.”

What she reported is troubling: Two-thirds of vaccine safety researchers receive industry support and sponsorship; part of FDA funding comes from fees pharmaceutical companies pay to have their drugs evaluated; working for agencies such as the CDC is often a “stepping stone to employment at a vaccine manufacturer”; since 2005 the pharmaceutical industry has employed “at least three lobbyists for every member of Congress,” many of whom are former government employees; and medical journals rely on advertising from pharmaceutical companies, and their “authors’ ties to vaccine manufacturers are pervasive.”

Good Vaccines

Such conflicts of interest are ruining what truly has been one of the greatest breakthroughs in the history of medical science. We can thank smallpox for the advent of vaccination. Prior to the 19th century, smallpox was a major cause of death worldwide and one of the most feared infectious diseases. About one in five victims died; those who survived were often left blind or disfigured. Some tried to combat the disease with variolation — injecting a healthy person with a small amount of pus from an infected patient. People were willing to risk it because the odds of death dropped from 20 to 2 percent. When it worked as hoped, the patient suffered a mild attack but was immune to future infection. In 1796, English doctor Edward Jenner noticed that milkmaids who contracted the benign disease cowpox were resistant to smallpox. He pioneered the revolutionary practice of vaccination, using material from the pustules of infected cows. The practice was hotly contested until smallpox deaths nose-dived wherever vaccination was introduced. Within 50 years it became the accepted norm, and less than 200 years later, in 1979, the World Health Organization announced smallpox effectively eradicated from the globe.

But when it comes to measles, we’re not dealing with a disease that can decimate populations as did smallpox throughout the world since ancient times. Among measles patients, Orient notes, “Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity.” Moreover, Physicians for Informed Consent recounts on its website that studies suggest a link between naturally acquired measles infection and reduced risk of certain diseases such as cancer, some allergies, and cardiovascular disease.

Chicken Little

Even less to be feared is chickenpox, although you wouldn’t know it by recent headlines. Little more than 20 years ago, government downplayed this common childhood malady on two of its popular PBS Kids series: Caillou (the four-year-old’s mother tells him, “They’re just little, itchy spots. Nothing to worry about”) and Arthur (the main character recovers from chickenpox in a few days, enjoying extra attention he gets in the meantime). Now, chickenpox is repackaged as a life-threatening plague. The CDC website strongly warns parents: “Chickenpox can be serious and can lead to severe complications and death, even in healthy children.”

What changed between then and now? The varicella (chickenpox) vaccine entered the scene in 1995. Prior to that, annual mortality rates were 0.003 percent, and most deaths involved immunocompromised adults. If that presented such a grave public health threat, why did it take so long for anyone to develop a vaccine?

Reading the CDC website, you’d think the vaccine was completely safe. Dr. Gary Goldman tells a different story. He served as research analyst for the CDC pilot varicella vaccine program in California from 1995 until 2002, when he resigned over the agency’s routine manipulation of data to conceal negative information. Many of those undesirable outcomes are reported through VAERS, however. As of mid-2018, the varicella vaccine has caused nearly 4,000 serious adverse events, including almost 200 deaths, most of whom were children under six. In the first few years after introduction, the manufacturer had to add 17 adverse events to its product labeling, including transmission of the vaccine virus, spinal cord injury, Guillain-Barre syndrome (an autoimmune disorder), and shingles.

There is also little press about the positive aspects of naturally acquired chickenpox. According to the National Vaccine Information Center, prior to 1995, children usually caught chicken pox by age six, leaving them with long-lasting immunity. (Those who contract it as adults face a higher risk of severe complications, making childhood illness more desirable.) After a young person recovers from natural chickenpox, the virus remains dormant in his body, and every future environmental exposure to the virus boosts his natural immunity by causing him to produce more antibodies, protecting him not only from future outbreaks but also from shingles, which is caused by the same virus. The temporary, artificial immunity of vaccines leaves older children and adults vulnerable to both. And someone who has never had chickenpox before can catch it directly from anyone with shingles, which in adults can be quite serious.

Nevertheless, mainstream media dutifully plug the vaccine and deliver a requisite Chicken Little performance when naturally acquired chickenpox hits. Last year, it blamed religious vaccination exemptions for 36 cases in a small North Carolina school. “Anti-vaccination stronghold in N.C. hit with state’s worst chickenpox outbreak in 2 decades,” shrieked the Washington Post last November. What happened to those 36 victims? They got over it.

If media apoplexy were our only worry, we could rest easy and enjoy the show. But does the fact that states are strong-arming parents over this common childhood illness signal the dawn of medical dictatorship? In 2013, New York refused a chickenpox vaccine medical exemption to a kindergartner, despite her doctor’s refusal to immunize her. He said the non-essential live virus vaccine could present a grave danger to the child’s 14-week-old sister, as well as her mother, who has an immunodeficiency disease. The mom told NBC News, “I don’t care if it’s a one in 3 million chance. I am not willing to take the chance with my baby.” Nevertheless, the state education department barred the child from attending school, and the parents were left with no option but homeschool.

Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin made waves in March when he announced opposition to his state’s mandatory varicella vaccine on a WKCT radio show. He sent media into a tailspin for purposely exposing his nine children to chickenpox at a neighbor’s house. “They got it … were miserable for a few days, and they all turned out fine,” Bevin said. “This is America and the federal government should not be forcing this [vaccine] upon people.”

But his state government certainly is forcing. Chickenpox drama has engulfed a small Catholic high school in Walton, Kentucky, Assumption Academy. After one diagnosed case at its affiliated elementary school located across the street, the academy’s unvaccinated students were banned from both schools and all athletic events for three weeks by the Northern Kentucky Health Department (NKHD). Unfortunately, the three-week count starts over again each time a child gets sick, regardless of clinical diagnosis. What began in mid-February has extended into late April at last report and could conceivably continue through the school year if more students develop symptoms. As of early April, 33 of the schools’ 240 students had been infected. Many other healthy, unimmunized students are prevented from returning, as the school reported to NKHD that only 18 percent of its students are up to date on vaccinations.

At least one of them is fighting back. Instead of finishing his basketball season as starting center in the state championship tournament, 18-year-old senior Jerome Kunkel is now embroiled in a legal battle with the state. “It’s not that I’m against all vaccines — just the ones made from aborted fetal cells,” he explains. “That’s against my religion.” (Live virus vaccines are developed in specialized cell cultures so they “forget” how to replicate correctly in normal body cells. Material from chickens, pigs, monkeys, dogs, cows, and even worms and insects can be used. The varicella vaccine is one of several developed using aborted babies.) Kunkel’s parents, Bill and Karen, have filed a religious exemption on these grounds every school year.

When they met with NKHD to plead Jerome’s case, communicable disease nurse Carolyn Swisshelm minced no words. “We can kick any kid out of that school,” Karen recalls her saying. Swisshelm assumes the right to exclude students with medical or religious exemptions during an outbreak, but Kentucky law doesn’t provide such boundless power to bureaucrats. Jerome’s initial court pleading quotes the state statute on health issues and religious freedom, which prevents government without grave reason from excluding people “motivated by a sincerely held religious belief” from “programs or access to facilities.”

Nevertheless, NKHD official Zach Raney pulled out his iron fist, warning the Kunkels: “I have the power to shut your school down,” and he did for three days until all non-vaccinated students underwent immunity testing. Jerome’s blood test proved he had no infection but no immunity either, so the health department has marked him a pariah, forcing him to start a GoFundMe page to defray court costs defending himself against the NKHD’s draconian overreach.

“This isn’t stopping chickenpox from spreading,” Jerome points out. “All of us [students] are still together. We go to church together, and after Sunday masses we usually get together for a pick-up game of basketball. It’s just not logical.”

Jerome lost his initial hearing in early April to lift the ban preventing him from returning to classes. The student’s lawyer, Chris Wiest, said they plan to appeal, arguing that NKHD’s reaction is overly restrictive. He told The New American, “I believe this case will be judged by a jury and, I believe, they will view the actions of the health department as retaliatory and discriminatory.”

Where We Are Headed

Jerome’s uncle, Bernard Kunkel, who works for Governor Bevin, warns of what could be on the horizon. “Children don’t belong to their parents anymore. They belong to the state,” he told The New American. “Before you know it, you’ll have to prove you’ve been vaccinated to get your driver’s license renewed. When does it stop?” He points out that neither Canada nor the U.K. have mandatory immunizations, though both share the same scientific knowledge and access to medicines that we have.

We’re witnessing government overreaction and overreach on a titanic scale. Diseases such as measles and chickenpox do not present catastrophic public health threats, and public welfare certainly does not require compulsory vaccinations for them. Government is cashing in on manufactured hysteria, stripping patients of their right to informed consent, a central mainstay of modern medicine. Parents should be fully informed about the true risks of both virus and vaccine, allowing them to make decisions with their doctors for their children, free from government interference.

But there is an unquestionably positive development in the vaccine debate. All the media hype is leading more parents to investigate and realize the government is deceiving them. As public trust in government erodes further than ever, future efforts toward mandatory vaccines will be met with more — and we hope successful — resistance.

Vaccine Choice Canada
Published on Mar 28, 2018
Vaccines and Glyphosate - A Toxic Combination
Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist, MIT Computer Science and AI Laboratory.
Slides available
As a PDF (https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/2018/Toronto_vaccines.pdf)

Thanks to Robert for recording this event!

9_a2FueONBU

Delight

16th May 2019, 01:34

Not only are the vaccine antagonists being silenced (parents, physicians, journalists) but information used to successfully remediate the symptoms of neurological and other damage is ALSO. One person mentioned by Stephanie Seneff is Kerri Rivera whose son responded positively to MMS (chlorine dioxide) when other treatments failed.

Strangely I cannot copy a link on youtube for a recent interview?

here is the address Kerri Rivera - Censored Author - Reveals Successful Protocol for Autism (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW_uON0Havk)

There is MMS info on PA but here is a documentary

Quantum Leap (http://www.quantumleap.is/)

Delight

16th May 2019, 03:11

MAY 15, 2019
RFK, Jr.: Gardasil “The Science” Video and Other Facts (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/video-playlist/rfk-jr-video-and-facts-about-gardasil/)

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.—“Many of the things I’m going to say today would be slanderous if they weren’t true. And, if they are not true, then Merck should sue me. But Merck won’t do that. And they won’t do that because in the United States, truth is an absolute defense against slander.”

This must-watch video details the many problems with the development and safety of Merck’s third-highest grossing product, Gardasil. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD’s Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel, ask that you watch and share this video so that you, and others, may make an informed decision of whether or not to give your child, boy or girl, a Gardasil vaccine. It can also be a useful tool for pediatricians who are trying to understand how this vaccine, that is actually causing health problems with young people, could have been approved by FDA and then recommended by CDC. The video is full of jaw-dropping facts about Gardasil and the clinical trials leading up to its release upon an unsuspecting public.

Transcript here
(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/video-playlist/rfk-jr-video-and-facts-about-gardasil/)
aluDs5SQjD8

Delight

16th May 2019, 03:43

Now that we know how IMPORTANT vaccination is for health and how DANGEROUS refusal will be, READ this today.

PUBLIC HEALTH
It's Not Just Measles. What You Should Know About Vaccines For Adults
May 15, 20198:31 AM ET
MARA GORDON (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/05/15/723282022/its-not-just-measles-what-you-should-know-about-vaccines-for-adults)

Amid one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in recent history, vaccines are on the minds of many Americans.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported this week that the number of measles cases this year has climbed to 839 in 23 states, affecting mostly unvaccinated people. Most people in the U.S. are vaccinated against measles when they're children as part of the routine immunizations they get in primary care.

We're used to kids needing lots of shots to ward off lots of illnesses, but what about adults? The CDC recommends that adults get multiple vaccines for conditions ranging from tetanus to influenza to cervical cancer. The shots can be a bit trickier to keep track of, as many adults go to the doctor less frequently than kids do, but those vaccinations are equally important for staying healthy.

"Many adults are not aware of what vaccines they actually need," says Dr. Pamela Rockwell, an associate professor of family medicine at the University of Michigan who works with the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. "That is also balanced by physician unawareness of what vaccines they should be recommending. It's gotten very complicated, and it is difficult to keep up with all the changes."

So we're here to answer some common questions about adult vaccines. Click on each topic to go to that section.

1. Measles 2. Shingles 3. Tetanus 4. Vaccines during pregnancy 5. Before meeting a newborn baby 6. Before visiting the elderly 7. Chickenpox 8. Hepatitis B, A and C 9. HPV

I was vaccinated against measles as a child, but the measles outbreak makes me worry that I'm no longer immune. Do I need to be revaccinated as an adult?

If you received the standard two doses of the modern measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, you're all set. You shouldn't need to be revaccinated, because you're considered immune for life.

And if you were born before 1957, doctors assume you were exposed to measles as a child and are already immune.

However, a version of the vaccine produced in the mid-to-late 1960s wasn't as effective as the current regimen, so if you were vaccinated before 1968, you should talk to your doctor about whether you need another shot. If you were born after 1957 but for some reason never got immunized, you should also get the MMR vaccine.

I've heard there's an effective vaccine for shingles, but my doctor's office doesn't have it and it's out of stock at the pharmacy. What's going on?

Shingrix is a two-dose vaccine that is upward of 95 percent effective at preventing shingles, a painful rash that tends to affect older adults and immunocompromised people. The vaccine was approved in 2017 and requires two injections. It's more effective than Zostavax, an older shingles vaccine, so doctors will recommend Shingrix over Zostavax to most patients over age 50.

There has been a shortage of Shingrix for almost as long as it has been available because demand for the vaccine has outpaced the supply. Its manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, told the CDC that it's working to step up its production schedule. But because every dose of Shingrix needs to undergo safety checks, GSK expects that shortages will continue at least through the end of the year.

Scramble For Shingles Vaccine: How To Cope With Shingrix Shortage
"The demand was so great they literally couldn't keep up," Rockwell says.

If you get the first dose, do your best to get the second one within two to six months. If your local pharmacies don't have Shingrix in stock, don't worry — you can use the HealthMap Vaccine Finder to find out where it is available. If you wait more than six months to get the second dose, you don't need to repeat the first one, but it's possible the vaccine won't be quite as effective in preventing shingles.

What's the deal with tetanus shots? How often do I need them?

Tetanus is a life-threatening disease of the nervous system that's caused by a toxin-producing bacterium usually found in soil. It can be prevented by a series of five childhood shots, including a booster between ages 11 and 12. Adults then need a booster shot every 10 years. It can be hard to keep track of this if you move or change doctors, so make a note in your calendar and don't be afraid to ask about it. If you get it early or a year or two late, it isn't harmful.

If you ever have an injury that might expose you to tetanus — such as stepping on a nail — your doctor will ask when your latest tetanus booster was and may give you another booster shot on the spot. If you're not up to date on your tetanus vaccines, you may need additional treatment to prevent the disease.

Childhood tetanus shots are combined with a vaccine for diphtheria, a dangerous infection that can affect kids, and one for pertussis, which is known as whooping cough. Your every-10-year tetanus and diphtheria boosters won't include pertussis, unless you're pregnant. But when you turn 65, you should again get the shot that protects against all three, which is known as Tdap.

I'm thinking about having a baby. What vaccines do I need?

Make sure you and everyone around you is up to date on standard childhood and adolescent vaccines, including pertussis, since babies are vulnerable to this disease. You should also get a dose of Tdap during prenatal care, since it's safe in pregnancy.

Everyone also should get an annual flu shot, because pregnant women, who have weakened immune systems, are particularly susceptible to influenza and can get very sick or die from an infection.

Severe Flu Raises Risk Of Birth Problems For Pregnant Women, Babies
SHOTS - HEALTH NEWS
Severe Flu Raises Risk Of Birth Problems For Pregnant Women, Babies
Even if you got all the recommended vaccines as a kid, it's possible your immunity has waned when it comes to some of the vaccine-preventable diseases that can be passed from mom to baby. This is why prenatal doctors and midwives check to make sure pregnant women are immune to hepatitis B, varicella (chickenpox) and rubella.

If you find out you're not immune before you get pregnant, you should get vaccinated again. The hepatitis B vaccine is safe during pregnancy. But the varicella and MMR (which includes rubella protection) vaccines are not safe for pregnant patients, so your doctor is likely to recommend that you get them after delivery.

I'm planning to visit my newborn nephew. What vaccines do I need?

If you've gotten all your recommended vaccines and boosters, you're almost ready to meet the baby. Babies, like pregnant women, have weak immune systems, so an annual flu shot is important before interacting with a newborn. Adults over 65 should have gotten a pertussis booster (included in the Tdap shot).

What about if I'm visiting my hospitalized, elderly grandmother?

Older, hospitalized adults are similar to newborns in that their immune systems are weak and particularly vulnerable to infections. Follow the same advice as if you're going to meet a new baby.

I was born before the varicella (chickenpox) vaccine existed. Do I need it now?

The varicella vaccine was approved in 1995, so if you were born before then, there's a good chance you weren't vaccinated.

But even if you weren't vaccinated, you're probably already immune because there's a high likelihood you've had chickenpox. The CDC says adults born before 1980 don't need the vaccine and don't need testing to prove their immunity.

There are some occasions when doctors will want to order blood tests to make sure their patients are actually immune to varicella — for pregnant women and health care workers, for example. If you get tested and the blood test shows you're still susceptible, your doctor will recommend that you get the vaccine. But because the vaccine is so effective and the blood test isn't always accurate, getting tested isn't necessary for everyone.

What do I need to know about all the different hepatitis shots?

Hepatitis means inflammation of the liver, but when we're talking about vaccines, we're referring to several types of viruses that infect liver cells and can cause lots of different and potentially life-threatening problems, ranging from diarrhea to liver failure to cancer. Routine childhood immunizations include vaccines for hepatitis A and hepatitis B, meaning virtually all kids in the U.S. are vaccinated against them.

Hepatitis B is transmitted through blood or sex. A vaccine for it has been available since the 1980s, but it's common for immunity to hepatitis B to decrease over time. If you work in health care or are thinking about becoming pregnant, your doctor might order a blood test that shows if you're still immune. If you're not, your doctor may recommend you get revaccinated as an adult.

Hepatitis A is transmitted through the fecal-oral route, meaning that if you eat something that has been contaminated with the feces of an infected person, you can get it. The vaccine for hepatitis A was approved in 1995. If you're not yet vaccinated and you fall into one of a few groups — including if you're a man who has sex with other men, you're traveling to a country where the virus is endemic, you live with a person who has had hepatitis A — you should get the shots.

Hepatitis C Not A Barrier For Organ Transplantation, Study Finds
SHOTS - HEALTH NEWS
Hepatitis C Not A Barrier For Organ Transplantation, Study Finds
Hepatitis C is another common viral infection that affects the liver. It's so common, in fact, that doctors routinely test people born between 1945 and 1965 for the virus. Unfortunately, there's no vaccine available for it, but it can be treated with an oral medication. If you haven't been screened for it, ask your doctor if you need to be.

Who should get the HPV vaccine? What's it for?

This is essentially a cancer vaccine.

The Food and Drug Administration initially approved the HPV vaccine for girls and young women in the early 2000s, but the range of people who should get it has since grown. The FDA recently approved its use for people up to age 45. FDA approval is different from CDC guidelines, however. The CDC still officially recommends that both boys and girls get their first shot by 11 or 12, up until age 26 for women and 21 for men. The CDC adds that men up to age 26 "may be vaccinated" based on a consult with a doctor. If you're older than 26 and haven't been vaccinated, again, talk to your doctor about whether you need it.

HPV stands for the human papillomaviruses, which cause a wide variety of conditions, ranging from common warts on hands and feet to cervical and anal cancer. The vaccine helps prevent infection from certain types of HPV, including the strains that are the most likely to cause cancer.

It's a series of two shots, six to 12 months apart, which is a change from when the vaccine was first approved — it used to require three shots. Children who are late getting the HPV vaccine and receive their first dose after age 15 will still need three doses.

And there's more.

You may also need vaccines for conditions such as pneumonia or meningitis. Ask your doctor. What your doctor recommends will depend on your medical history and your risk factors, so don't be afraid to speak up at your next appointment. You can use this CDC quiz to see what might be right for you.

Mara Gordon is a family physician in Washington, D.C., and a health and media fellow at NPR and Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Delight

16th May 2019, 14:49

Vaccine compensation stats

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The federal government Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services just concluded their first meeting of 2019 on March 8th.

These quarterly meetings include a report from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on cases settled for vaccine injuries and deaths as mandated by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).

The NVICP was started as a result of a law passed in 1986 that gave pharmaceutical companies total legal immunity from being sued due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines.

Drug manufacturers in the vaccine market can now create as many new vaccines as they desire, with no risk of being sued if their product causes injury or death.

This has resulted in a huge increase of vaccines entering the market, and the U.S. government, through the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), is the largest purchaser of these vaccines, spending in excess of $5 billion taxpayer dollars each year to purchase these vaccines.

The CDC’s annual budget of $5 BILLION to purchase vaccines from pharmaceutical companies with American taxpayer funds, and the NVICP law which gives legal immunity to the pharmaceutical industry for injuries and deaths due to vaccines, are facts that are routinely censored and withheld from the public in the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media, as well as in government legislative hearings that seek to mandate vaccines by force.

If you or a family member is injured or dies from vaccines, you must sue the federal government and go up against their attorneys in this special vaccine court.

Many cases are litigated for years before a settlement is reached, as can be seen from the report below. One flu shot victim litigated for 7 years before reaching a settlement, and one Gardasil HPV vaccine victim litigated for over 5 years before reaching a settlement, for example.

Another Gardasil HPV vaccine victim who suffered cardiac arrest and death, took over 3 years to settle.

As far as we know, Health Impact News is the only media source that publishes these DOJ reports on vaccine injuries and deaths each quarter. Past reports can be found here (http://vaccineimpact.com/vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-compensated-through-vaccine-court/).

The March 8, 2019 report states that 307 petitions were filed during the 3-month time period between 11/16/18 – 2/15/19, with 153 cases being adjudicated and 125 cases compensated.

The DOJ report only lists 83 of these settlements for vaccine injuries and deaths.

The total amount of damages paid out by the U.S. Government so far in 2019 for vaccine injuries and deaths is over $110 MILLION. (Source.)

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/03/DOJ-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-3.19-report-page-1.jpg

Mandatory Flu Shots on the Way?
67 of the 83 vaccine injury cases listed in this report were for the flu shot.

Currently, state legislatures across the country, as well as federal Congressional hearings the past two weeks, have considered mandating vaccines for childhood diseases based on a measles “outbreak” of about 130 people in 10 states over a several month period.

Only one person in the U.S. has died from the measles in the past 12 years, while the The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) lists hundreds of reported deaths due to the measles vaccine. See:

ZERO U.S. Measles Deaths in 10 Years, but Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths Reported
Since the CDC claims that tens of thousands of people die each year from the flu (although those claims are estimates, and not based on facts – see: Did 80,000 People Really Die from the Flu Last Year? Inflating Flu Death Estimates to Sell Flu Shots), is the next step in legislative mandatory vaccine efforts going to be mandating the flu vaccine for every American all in the name of “the greater good?”

Senator Rand Paul last week addressed this very issue, in voicing his opposition to government-forced vaccines ( Mar 5, 2019):

WShX_fNXWKg

As Senator Paul pointed out in his comments, the annual flu vaccine is based on a guess as to which strains will be most prevalent in the upcoming flu season, and in some years they are completely wrong.
READ MORE HERE (https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/2019-doj-report-on-vaccine-court-reveals-vaccines-continue-to-injure-and-kill-people-110-million-in-damages-paid-out-first-quarter/)

Delight

16th May 2019, 15:20

This is slightly off topic but telling. Apparently there is a real deficit of capacity to think reasonably when faced with emotionally laden topics. If one has been emotionally conditioned by certain themes (such as Arabic = a negative connotation) then people will reject all "things" Arabic?

56 Percent Of Americans Don't Think We Should Teach Arabic Numerals In School (https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/56-percent-of-americans-dont-think-we-should-teach-arabic-numerals-in-school/)

If you grew up in America, you've probably used Arabic numerals pretty much every day of your life in some way. Same if you're English, French, or from most other countries.

Even in China and Japan, where other numerals are used (零,Yī, 二, Èr, 三, for example), Arabic numerals are still regularly employed. Unless you're reading this in ancient Rome, you probably use them too.

Nevertheless, a survey conducted by poll company Civic Science has found that 56 percent of Americans would like Arabic numerals (which are the numbers 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9, used in every number right up until infinity) banned in schools. America, your prejudice is showing.

John Dick
@jdcivicscience
Ladies and Gentlemen: The saddest and funniest testament to American bigotry we've ever seen in our data.

@MaxKennerly
Replying to @jdcivicscience @mehdirhasan
I, for one, fully support a return to Judeo-Christian values by <checks notes> using Roman numerals for math.

@Brian_Bokenyi
Replying to @jdcivicscience
IXXX% IN FAVOR
LIV% OPPOSE
XV% NO OPINION

In the survey, 3,624 people were asked: "Should schools in America teach Arabic Numerals as part of their curriculum?" to which 2,020 people (56 percent) said "no", and just 29 percent actually said "yes".

The survey was designed to show the tribal impulses of people to answer a question without understanding it first, along their own biased lines.

"Our goal in this experiment was to tease out prejudice among those who didn't understand the question," Civic Science's CEO John Dick explained on Twitter.

"Most people don't know the origins of our numerical system and yet picked a tribal answer anyway. You can argue that one is worse than the other but both prove a similar point."

Fifty-six percent is a lot of people to both not realize that the numbers we use are Arabic numerals and to say they shouldn't be taught in schools.

However, this bias wasn't unique to people prejudiced against the word "Arabic". The survey also posed the question "Should schools in America teach the creation theory of Catholic priest Georges Lemaître as part of their science curriculum?" to which 53 percent of respondents said "no".

John Dick
@jdcivicscience
Replying to @AngelaZontek
For what it's worth, the tribal impulse is evident on both sides, as seen here. Lemaitre is arguably even more obscure than Arabic numbers and yet people defaulted to their generally prejudiced corners.

Which is a shame because while Georges Lemaître was a Catholic priest, his "theory of creation" was the theory that the universe is expanding, which was soon confirmed by Hubble and is now better known as the Big Bang theory.

"Sorry to break this to everyone but it appears neither side has a monopoly on blind prejudice," Dick wrote. "Either that or 73% of Democrats believe schools shouldn't be teaching students about the Big Bang Theory."

John Dick
@jdcivicscience
Replying to @ClimateDuncan and 2 others
For what it's worth, this kind of blind prejudice can happen on both sides. While Lemaitre is more obscure than Arabic Numerals, the resulting effect is almost identical. Dems are biased against Western religion, if latently.

Rather than just answering "don't know", it appears to be pretty common to answer along prejudiced lines. In December 2015, Public Policy Polling released results of a poll that showed 41 percent of Trump supporters (and 19 percent of Democrats) supported bombing Agrabah, a fictional city from the Disney cartoon Aladdin, Snopes reports.

Maybe that is true about the vaccine topic? I know that I reject all injected vaccines and I know others think all vaccines are GOOD. I AM for the science and at the same time I distrust the sources of "studies". I know we have to take this matter of health outside prejudices.

I am willing to examine my stance about vaccines. For instance, in a way IMO one could call fecal implants a "kind" of vaccination? It is introducing bacteria etc. into the GI tract and has been shown to remediate symptoms of many ills. I am not too uncomfortable with the idea of oral and maybe inhaled ingestion being a "natural" route for vaccination?

However my major concern is STILL that we cannot accept forced vaccination.

Delight

16th May 2019, 22:31

DAVID VS. GOLIATH

Brent Wisner In Studio with his $2B Monsanto Verdict; Del Rocks Rockland; Shocking MMR Trial Data; Dr. Toni Bark Breaks Down Vaccine Scandal That Devastated Israel.

AX7XhPreDcw

Delight

17th May 2019, 03:24

Jonathan W. Emord (born January 16, 1961) is an American attorney who practices constitutional and administrative law. He is also a columnist, a lecturer, and author of books and articles on issues of constitutional law and politics. He represents food and dietary supplement manufacturers, physicians who practice integrative medicine, and non-profit groups, and is a non-scientist board member of the Certification Board for Nutrition Specialists.

Here he speaks to the unconstitutional mandatory vaccine issue. Now as of May 3, 2019 H.R.2527 — 116th Congress (2019-2020) wants to mandate compulsory "establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes." OR lose federal funds

Emord’s Sacred Fire of Liberty, Federal vax mandates, Pharma liability, NY legislation, Alabama abortion, vScienceBites, Dr. Sherri Tennpenny, Measles facts and MORE! http://www.robertscottbell.com/natura...

MudUlgpl5Ng

ThePythonicCow

17th May 2019, 13:20

This thread has had over 1300 viewers, some 23% of whom were Avalon members, and the rest guests. It is averaging between 60 and 100 distinct viewers (distinct IP addresses) per day.

Hervé

17th May 2019, 14:27

For some historical background: How Plumbing (Not Vaccines) Eradicated Disease (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106497-Debunking-Romantic-Ideas-About-the-Past&p=1291420&viewfull=1#post1291420)

onawah

17th May 2019, 16:16

It's an issue which has grown so huge and threatening, with such broad implications that it simply cannot be ignored any longer, especially by conspiracy theorists!

This thread has had over 1300 viewers, some 23% of whom were Avalon members, and the rest guests. It is averaging between 60 and 100 distinct viewers (distinct IP addresses) per day.

Delight

17th May 2019, 16:42

The lack of liability of manufacturers and the lack of accountability of providers is one of the major imbalances in the system of vaccination policies.

The makers and sellers and individual providers need to be held accountable. Providing Informed Consent (by identifying people at risk for serious reactions) is the responsibility of the health care system. The fact that physicians accept reimbursement for their vaccination quotas is not balanced by their lack of personal accountability for the outcomes.

Proper technique is assumed but is not always happening. Practically anyone can inject a person with this POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE. These people who give the shots also need to be held liable.

The system is broken. When the 1986 ruling for the manufacturers that shifts the liability to the federal government is over turned, that will make a tremendous difference.

Is focus on refusing to allow all these layers of the vaccine agenda to MANDATE without repercussions a point where people could all agree?

Apparently large numbers of injury begin JUST WITH the shot itself.

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347325/#idm140251195979344title)

Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration is an under-reported, preventable series of events caused by incorrect technique or landmarking for intramuscular deltoid injections.1,2 Specifically, SIRVA occurs when an intramuscular deltoid injection is administered into the shoulder joint.1,2 This results in an inflammatory process that causes damage to the musculoskeletal structures including the bursae, tendons, and ligaments.2 The main symptoms include persistent shoulder pain and a limited range of motion.2 The keys to distinguishing SIRVA are that the symptoms typically begin within 48 hours of vaccine administration and that they do not improve with over-the-counter analgesic medications.2 Patients will often visit their physicians months later because they are not able to carry out daily tasks that were possible before the vaccination.2 These patients are often diagnosed with inflammatory injuries such as bursitis, rotator cuff tears, and adhesive capsulitis.1

Federal Program Pays Out Millions for Shots Given Incorrectly But Only for Certain Vaccines
By Jodie Fleischer, Rick Yarborough and Jeff Piper
Published May 16, 2019 (https://www.nbcwashington.com/investigations/Federal-Program-Pays-Out-Millions-for-Shots-Given-Incorrectly-But-Only-for-Certain-Vaccines-509991131.html)
A federal program has paid out millions of dollars to people injured after having a vaccine they say was given incorrectly, but many patients are finding out, even if they have that same injury, they're not eligible for the program, leaving them few options for any relief.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program pays injured patients settlements to prevent them from suing vaccine makers. The News4 I-Team tracked more than $133 million paid to people with a condition called shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). It now makes up more than half of all the new cases filed in the program each year.

"Everybody is starting to become more aware of the incidence of SIRVA. That's why I think that number will keep going up," said Paul Brazil, who specializes in vaccine injury cases.

Brazil has filed hundreds of SIRVA claims for patients around the country. He says they've experienced excruciating pain and limited use of their arm. Any shot given too high in the deltoid muscle can cause SIRVA, no matter which vaccine is in the syringe.

1/2 of New Vaccine Cases Allege Injury by Shots Given Wrong

An I-Team review found half of all the new federal vaccine injury cases allege “shoulder injury resulting from vaccine administration,” or SIRVA, and have little or nothing to do with what was in the syringe. Jodie Fleischer reports.(Published Wednesday, May 2, 2018)
"People have multiple surgeries. They could be missing time from work. They could have out-of-pocket medical expenses," Brazil said. "It can be a pretty substantial monetary payment."

Virginia resident Bob Simmons said he developed SIRVA immediately following a shingles vaccine in April 2018. More than a year later, the 72-year-old triathlete said he can't even use his left arm to hold a dinner plate, let alone pick up his eight grandchildren.

"Compared to the injuries a lot of people have, catastrophic injuries and everything else, it's hard for me to complain too much. But it is an inconvenience; it's tough," Simmons said. "And it doesn't seem to be getting any better."

Program Pays Patients Hurt by Shots, Doesn't Tell Shot-Giver
But even though SIRVA is believed to be caused by how the shot is given, Simmons found you have to have had the right shot to get paid through the program.

Seasonal flu shots are covered. Tetanus shots are covered. Shingles shots are not.

"Any claim where you list the shingles vaccine as the cause of your injury will just be summarily dismissed," Brazil said.

Program Pays Patients Hurt by Shots, Doesn't Tell Shot-Giver
The News4 I-Team found a federal program that pays the victims of shots given incorrectly a settlement but doesn't tell the person who gave the shot. Jodie Fleischer reports.(Published Monday, June 18, 2018)

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created decades ago for the childhood vaccines that kids are required get in their first few years of life. If adults get the same version kids get, they're covered, too. In fact, adults now account for most of the cases in the program. But Congress never expanded it to include adults-only versions of vaccines.

The pneumonia vaccine, Prevnar, is covered, but Pneumovax, primarily for adults, is not. The shingles vaccine differs slightly from the childhood vaccine for chicken pox, so injuries from a chicken pox shot are covered, but the same injuries when caused by a shingles shot are not.

Simmons says if SIRVA is a covered injury in the program; it shouldn't matter what kind of shot it was.

Half of New Vaccine Cases Allege Injury by Shots Given Wrong
"It's ridiculous! Why should it [matter]? It's the administration of the shot, not what's in the shot," he said.

Brazil said it's unfair, but there is an explanation.

"It really comes down to money," he said.

For every vaccine covered by the program, the patient getting the shot pays a 75-cent tax, which helps fund those payouts. So shots that don't collect the tax can't be included.

Brazil said sometimes you can't even tell which shot caused the injury. Seniors often get multiple shots at the same time, in the same arm.

"There are a lot of reasons why it would make sense to just include every vaccine," Brazil said. "If Pharma wanted to change it, if they wanted to be included, they'd be included."

He said the pharmaceutical company Merck could have pushed to get its shingles shot, Zostavax, into the program but didn't. Now the company is facing dozens of lawsuits alleging serious side effects, including death.

But Brazil said SIRVA cases are excluded from that action.

"SIRVA's a little different because we think SIRVA is caused by improper administration. Therefore, the manufacturer wouldn't be on the hook for that," Brazil said.

Plus, the shingles shot Simmons got was from a different vaccine-maker. His only option would be going after the vaccine-giver.

"That would require suing the pharmacy, or wherever he received the vaccine, and trying to prove negligence," Brazil said. "Mr. Simmons is in a tough spot."

Simmons said the Costco pharmacist who gave him the shot was standing while he was sitting down, which the CDC warns against.

“Costco cannot comment on the specifics regarding this particular case, however, all Costco Pharmacists are certified to administer immunizations and have received training through a nationally recognized accredited program,” Costco said in a statement to the I-Team. “Our immunization procedure manual is updated annually and includes information on proper vaccine administration. Additionally, any reported immunization incidents are submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”

Simmons said Costco did report his injury to the manufacturer and a federal system that tracks vaccine injuries.

It's now been a year since his shot, and he said he's lost 80 percent of his arm's strength.

"I'm not really litigious in nature," Simmons said. "I just want to get my arm fixed. I was in pretty good shape up until that point in time."

Reported by Jodie Fleischer, produced by Rick Yarborough, and shot and edited by Jeff Piper.https://www.nbcwashington.com/investigations/Federal-Program-Pays-Out-Millions-for-Shots-Given-Incorrectly-But-Only-for-Certain-Vaccines-509991131.html

There are many indications that the administration of vaccines via muscle (route) is flawed. The local injury of SIRVA, the mechanism by which the immune system responds to the adjuvants and the obvious systemic injuries all show the technique is poor. Skin, the GI tract and the Respiratory tract are the way that the body naturally processes antigens and develops immunity.

The vaccine "idea" of deliberately introducing information to the body so that there is an immune response that is less dramatic than the disease itself is a good one. This is why propaganda is able to over ride the facts.

Once upon a time milkmaids who encountered a cow's cowpox also developed reistance to small pox. This morphed into deliberately scratching the skin with virulent material form the cow. The the process was removed farther and farther from a "natural" delivery. Now the remove is so great and the mechanism so foreign that the vaccine itself is DEADLY.

Florence Nightingale, NOT physicians in her era showed the most IMPORTANT missing aspect. Interventions "nursing" us to health with natural processes (like natural healing processes from all eras and all cultures) does no harm. Surgery is helpful when bones are broken. Physicians job is to UNDERSTAND the person, his/her body and how to direct the "nursing".

According to Nightingale, nursing is separate from medicine. The goal of nursing is to put the patient in the best possible condition in order for nature to act.

IMO what Jenner did FIRST was an act of nursing nature along.

Edward Jenner, an English country doctor from Gloucestershire, administers the world’s first vaccination as a preventive treatment for smallpox, a disease that had killed millions of people over the centuries.

While still a medical student, Jenner noticed that milkmaids who had contracted a disease called cowpox, which caused blistering on cow’s udders, did not catch smallpox. Unlike smallpox, which caused severe skin eruptions and dangerous fevers in humans, cowpox led to few ill symptoms in these women. On May 14, 1796, Jenner took fluid from a cowpox blister and scratched it into the skin of James Phipps, an eight-year-old boy. A single blister rose up on the spot, but James soon recovered. On July 1, Jenner inoculated the boy again, this time with smallpox matter, and no disease developed. The vaccine was a success. Doctors all over Europe soon adopted Jenner’s innovative technique, leading to a drastic decline in new sufferers of the devastating disease.https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/jenner-tests-smallpox-vaccine

Introduction of variolation and vaccination
Disfiguring pockmarks were 1 sequela of smallpox survival, and those who bore these scars were observed to be immune to disease recurrence. Although persons who acquired smallpox through a scratch were not completely protected from disease, they had an attenuated disease course. On the basis of these observations, attempts were made to expose people to smallpox material, thus inducing a milder form of the disease and protecting against fulminant smallpox on natural exposure. Inoculation with smallpox pus or scabs either by a nasal or cutaneous route, a process known as variolation, was initiated as early as 1000 AD in China.2
The practice of vaccination was introduced centuries later by Edward Jenner in 1796. The term vaccination is derived from vacca, the Latin word for cow. Milkmaids who developed cowpox lesions were observed to be resistant to smallpox. Jenner took material from a cowpox lesion on the hand of milkmaid Sarah Nelmes and inoculated a young boy, James Phipps. Phipps was resistant to smallpox on subsequent exposure. Jenner extended this experiment to other children, with the same outcome. Cowpox inoculation was relatively benign compared with variolation, and Jenner's practice of vaccination gradually gained acceptance. Initially, vaccination was performed with cowpox virus, but over time, vaccinia virus, the origin of which is unknown, became the preferred virus for vaccination.2
Smallpox eradication
At the start of the 19th century, arm-to-arm vaccination was practiced; however, by the close of the century, this practice was being replaced by vaccine produced from the hides of live animals by harvesting lymph. This was primarily done in calves, but donkeys and horses were also used. Although this practice allowed manufacturing capacity to be distributed even to remote areas, it was complicated by the risk of contamination from bacteria, fungi, and other viruses and raised the theoretical risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies.4 Strains of vaccinia virus and methods of storage and application of vaccines varied significantly by region after a century of nonstandardized and unregulated smallpox vaccination.2 In 1965, the World Health Organization (WHO) mandated that undiluted smallpox vaccine should contain 1 × 108 plaque-forming units per milliliter.5 Vaccine was introduced into the epidermis by various methods, but in 1968, the bifurcated needle became the accepted method of vaccination because of its practical advantages. The bifurcated needle was designed to contain about 2.5 μL vaccine suspension, facilitating transfer of the vaccine to the skin, and the flat prongs provided consistent delivery to the right depth during the multiple shallow punctures administered.Smallpox vaccines: Past, present, and future (https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(06)02013-6/fulltext)

petra

17th May 2019, 16:54

Hi Delight, I tried searching the thread for 'dna' but the word is too short, I found this based off your other posting in the Internet Censorship thread. "Dirty Genes?!" Very unsettling. EDIT: And so are "Unintended consequences", that's really putting me on edge.

Unintended Consequences: Dirty Genes in Vaccines
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/05/unintended-consequences-dirty-genes-in-vaccines/

ThePythonicCow

17th May 2019, 17:06

Hi Delight, I tried searching the thread for 'dna' but the word is too short
These four posts above have the word dna or DNA in them:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106821-The-US-Vaccine-issue-is-more-than-just-about-the-Shots-it-is-about-totalitarian-tiptoe&p=1288694&viewfull=1#post1288694
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106821-The-US-Vaccine-issue-is-more-than-just-about-the-Shots-it-is-about-totalitarian-tiptoe&p=1288952&viewfull=1#post1288952
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106821-The-US-Vaccine-issue-is-more-than-just-about-the-Shots-it-is-about-totalitarian-tiptoe&p=1289159&viewfull=1#post1289159
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106821-The-US-Vaccine-issue-is-more-than-just-about-the-Shots-it-is-about-totalitarian-tiptoe&p=1291114&viewfull=1#post1291114

frankstien

17th May 2019, 19:25

https://www.dailymail.co.uk%2Fsciencetech%2Farticle-7012449%2FInstagram-BLOCK-hashtags-promote-anti-vaccination-misinformation.html

09 May 2019 | [At the behest of the pharma-terrorists,] Instagram has struggled to beat back content promoting vaccination conspiracy theories, so it's taking new steps to prevent misinformation around this topic from spreading further. The company will now begin to block hashtags that show consistently false information about vaccines, such as #vaccinescauseautism and #vaccinesarepoison. Once a hashtag has been blocked, if a user attempts to search that term, it will no longer return any results when users click on it.

onawah

17th May 2019, 19:35

A post copied from a local anti-vaccine FB group in my area: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfRlfhGWsAA0kjK.jpg:large
https://i.redd.it/p3tkxfsg2ci21.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0JvXV_WoAAegip.jpg
http://https://angel4light.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/biggest-lie-is-vaccines-are-good-jpg.jpeg?w=535
https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/55560669_10218949553798983_6318738942229217280_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=c10929362b57e5a85f0398c1d0eda28d&oe=5D65DC17
"👉A little factual history, because most people really don't realize the true history of Polio. We all just think of paralyzed children in iron lungs who later died. But, the Merck manual says that more than 90% of polio cases simply resembled the stomach flu, another 5% had abortive polio which included a sore throat, and another 3% had non-paralytic polio which includes some limb weakness and numbness. This 98% of people infected with polio had a complete recovery (and have life long immunity) and the symptoms resolved within 10-14 days. About 2% (slightly less) had paralytic polio. Of this 2% it is divided into 3 subcategories, but among the 3 more than 50% had a complete recovery rate, and in the other 50% some had a longer recovery and some did not fully recover - having some paralysis and some died. Of that 2%, 2% had bulbar polio, which was the horrific kind shown on TV (that is less than .04% of the people that contracted polio).

👉Charts show a decline from the peak of polio in 1954, BEFORE vaccine trials began on April 12, 1955. After the vaccine trials started, an INCREASE in Polio cases was reported in Vermont (up 266%), Rhode Island (up 454%) and Massachusetts (up 643%). Idaho and Utah eve BANNED the vaccine because prior to the vaccine trials there had never been a case reported in those states and once they started vaccinating, people were getting infected.

👉In June of 1955, just weeks after massive vaccination started, 2 of 8 lots of vaccines were administered which released live virus, infecting 40,000 people with polio, 164 were permanently paralyzed and 10 died."

http://www.nbcnews.com/…/polio-outbreak-sparked-vaccine-ex…/

http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/polio.html

http://reducetheburden.org/polio-a-shot-in-the-dark/

This study shows those vaccinated are able to spread polio. For 2 months polio was running through their community, via VDPV, and only 1 child, immunocompromised, had any issue! Polio is not the "killer/iron lung-er it's portrayed to be. 95% of polio that contract polio never even know they have it.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19090774

http://m.chicagoreader.com/c…/the-politics-of-polio/Content…

https://youtu.be/LR7FRVSb1So

https://www.facebook.com/jason.christoff.12/posts/10205628824732297

http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10091

Prior to 1954, the following undoubtedly hid behind the name “poliomyelitis”: Transverse Myelitis, viral or “aseptic” meningitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)- (what Franklin Delano Roosevelt had), Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, post-polio syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis(AFP).

Included under the umbrella term “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” are Poliomyelitis, Transverse Myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, Reye’s syndrome etc.

See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/…/smoke-mirrors-and-the…/…

India and the vaccine causing polio:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.4161/hv.6.12.13354

The Cutter Incident:
“The contaminated vaccine was directly responsible for five deaths and 51 cases of permanent paralysis among those who were vaccinated by the Cutter product. The vaccine also triggered a small epidemic among family members and others who had close contact with the children whod fallen ill. This resulted in five more deaths, and 113 more cases of paralysis.”

“In addition, about 40,000 children mostly in California, Idaho, New Mexico and Arizona developed the stiff neck, headache, fever and muscle weakness of abortive polio, a short-lived and milder form of the disease that leaves no lasting damage.”

When polio vaccine backfired / Tainted batches killed 10 and paralyzed 164.

http://www.sfgate.com/…/When-polio-vaccine-backfired-Tainte…

Vaccine induced polio

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC110068/

Polio caused by the vaccine. Very good article in The Lancet.

http://www.thelancet.com/…/PIIS0140-6736(14)61251…/fulltext…

Read Dr. Suzanne Humphries chapter on polio for free!

http://jeffreydachmd.com/…/Suzanne_humphries_dissolving_ill…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rZMn7oapJD4

https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredibleOpinionWithForrestMaready/videos/1656632224660551/

https://www.facebook.com/brandy.vaughan.98/posts/10154293744201397

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10472327/

http://jeffreydachmd.com/…/Suzanne_humphries_dissolving_ill…

http://www.ageofautism.com/…/pesticides-and-the-age-of-poli…

Salk polio vaccine video:

In case you didn't know, vaccines were spreading polio. "On September 24, 1976, the Washington Post reported Dr. Salk's assertion that the Sabin live oral virus vaccine had been the "principal if not sole cause" of every reported polio case in the United States since 1961. Salk repeated this accusation July 6, 1977, when he was interviewed on CBC television, saying: "We have known now since 1961 in the United States, and prior to that in other countries, that the live virus vaccine for polio does cause the disease itself."
This is where he said that in 1977 on television. Proof."

http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1814511606

The chances of getting polio worldwide are over 1 in 19 million according to data from 2014. Most cases are asymptomatic, meaning you have no symptoms. High doses of vitamin C can prevent complications. See info on Pentacel and pediarix. They are polio combo vaccines.

Poliomyelitis = 72% of infections cause no symptoms; 25% flu-like symptoms that last 2-5 days; 0.5% leads to more severe symptoms such as paralytic polio; only people with the paralytic infection are considered to have the disease.

Treatment:
Polio - High doses of Vitamin C

http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html

The true history:

"Dissolving Illusions" By Dr. Suzanne Humphries MD

(It's a Best Seller on Amazon)
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://www.amazon.com/…/1…/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_ApZ9ybKK7ZS13

https://www.npr.org/…/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-c…

CDC admitted the cancer causing SV40 was in the polio vaccine then tried to erase this:

http://preventdisease.com/images13/CDC_Polio.png

13 Things You Don't Know About Polio

1. A pesticide common in the 1800's was called Paris Green. A green liquid because it was a combination of copper and arsenic or lead and arsenic. Some of the most toxic substances known to humankind.

2. This pesticide worked by causing neurological damage in the bugs, causing organ failure.

3. Polio consists of symptoms synonymous with neurological damage, causing organ failure.

4. Heavy metal poisoning from lead, mercury and other similar heavy metals manifest lesions on neurological tissues, meaning the toxin destroys the nerve/communication pathways connecting the brain to the organs in the body. http://bit.ly/1OLcFgG

5. Polio victims present lesions on neurological tissue, that cause the organs to malfunction all around the body. (lungs, heart, nerves that control walking etc)

6. Polio outbreaks hit throughout the summer, only during pesticide spraying times. (not the sunless and damp winter/spring seasons regarding other disease outbreaks)

7. Polio had NO ability to spread from infected victims to the uninfected. Polio infected clusters of people in the exact same areas, suddenly and swiftly. http://bit.ly/1P6zShV

8. Parents report finding their children paralyzed in and around apple orchards. One of the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops of the time (with lead arsenate or copper arsenate) were apple orchards.

9. President Roosevelt became paralyzed over night while on his farm in the summer, which contained many crops, including apple orchards. He also swam the day prior in a bay that was heavily polluted by industrial agricultural run off.

10. Dr. Ralph Scobey and Dr. Mortind Biskind testified in front of the U.S Congress in 1951 that the paralysis around the country known as polio was being caused by industrial poisons and that a virus theory was purposely fabricated by the chemical industry and the government to deflect litigation away from both parties. http://bit.ly/1DKDb3v

11. In 1956 the AMA (The American Medical Association) instructed each licensed medical doctor that they could no longer classify polio as polio, or their license to practice would be terminated. Any paralysis was now to be diagnosed as AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) MS, MD, Bell's Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Guillian-Barre, meningitis etc etc. http://bit.ly/1Ml3rpX This was orchestrated purposely to make the public believe polio was eradicated by the polio vaccine campaign but because the polio vaccine contained toxic ingredients directly linked to paralysis, polio cases (not identified as polio) were skyrocketing...but only in vaccinated areas. http://bit.ly/1WEHYzR

12. The first polio vaccine was worked on by Dr. Jonas Salk and human experiments using this vaccine were conducted purposely on orphans in government/church run institutions because they were vulnerable and didn't require any parental consent signatures, as they had no parents. The vaccine was "declared safe" by "medicine" (as they always are even though that vaccine was killing and paralyzing monkeys in test trials) and that vaccine gave 40,000 orphans polio, permanently paralyzed hundreds and killed at least 10 children. All injuries and deaths under reported of course by the same authorities who orchestrated the atrocity. This was called The Cutter Incident. Have you noticed the medical industry's obsession with poisoning children? http://1.usa.gov/1mEozNJ

13. The next "improved" polio vaccine, given to hundreds of millions, carried both the SV 40 cancer virus as well as the AIDS virus. Every step of the way, medicine declaring they know for sure, that this time, they have everything straightened out. Same story then, same story now. The only thing larger than the pile of broken medical and government promises, is the pile of broken and dead bodies. http://bit.ly/1HfHR7W Cancerous tumors, still being pulled out of people today, are riddled with SV40 cancer viruses from the government's "safe and effective" and "approved" polio vaccine. http://bit.ly/1jGvysV

When someone talks of any disease, in this day and age, they're often just repeating what they were told by the government. When someone today repeats anything about polio and polio elimination based on vaccination, they're repeating known lies, told by known liars. Repeating what you're told and intelligence aren't the same thing. Repeating or intelligence. The choice is yours. Research the hidden history of polio, the disease that never was."

https://vactruth.com/2015/07/05/cdc-made-polio-disappear/

https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/polio-vaccine-cancer/

#knowbetterdobetter
#nototoxins "

Delight

18th May 2019, 04:33

More unintended consequences
the highlighted portion mentions my earlier point that the route of vaccine injection is not natural.

Influenza vaccines and dengue-like disease
[Title modified on 11 April 2018 by Sharon Davies, The BMJ] (https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k1378/rr-15)

Last year's influenza vaccine also contained the same H3N2 strain as this year's vaccine (A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)-like virus). Many people would have developed long term IgE mediated sensitization to the H3N2 viral proteins due to last year's vaccine [1–4]⁠. Those who received the Flublok vaccine can be expected to have an even stronger IgE response due to its 3X viral protein content [5,4]⁠. This year's vaccine H3N2 proteins would have been neutralized by these IgE antibodies. Thus resulting in the observed low vaccine efficacy. [6⁠]

When a person making anti-H3N2 IgE is infected with H3N2, one can expect the course of the flu to be significantly worse. So the "cytokine storm" being observed in severe cases is likely to be an infection concurrent with an allergic reaction. Death is caused by anaphylactic shock but due to the presence of an infection, it is wrongly classified as septic shock.

In the case of food allergy for example, the allergen exposure can be large enough to cause an immediate hypersensitivity reaction and anaphylactic shock within minutes/hours. In the case of influenza allergy, it may take a day or two for the virus to replicate and produce enough viral exposure for anaphylaxis. So the anaphylaxis unfolds over a couple of days.

“Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine-aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.” [7⁠]

This result makes a lot of sense. When you have influenza virus allergy and are infected, you have more mast cell degranulation, more histamine, more mucus, more sneezing, more viral shedding.

Increased hospitalization rates have been observed in asthma patients that have received the influenza vaccine. Again, this is as predicted because asthma patients are likely to produce stronger IgE responses to the viral proteins upon vaccination. [8⁠] On subsequent virus exposure, they can be expected to develop severe IgE mediated asthma.

Consider dengue infection. The initial mosquito bite that injects dengue virus into a person, causes the induction of IgE against dengue proteins. [9]⁠ Upon a subsequent bite that introduces the dengue virus again, the person develops hives due to a dengue specific-IgE mediated allergic reaction. As the infection (and thus allergic reaction) progresses and more histamine is released, vascular permeability increases. The result is hypotension and dengue shock syndrome. [10]⁠ Basically, a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction caused upon dengue virus exposure following IgE mediated sensitization to dengue viral proteins.

The route of exposure for natural influenza infection is the respiratory tract, not subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection. Influenza vaccines artificially changed the route of initial viral protein exposure to SC or IM injection thus making it similar to the route of exposure for dengue. The result is an IgE response to influenza proteins, similar to the response for dengue. It should therefore not come as a surprise that we are modifying the course of influenza infection such that it is acquiring characteristics of a dengue infection (hives and shock).

As a result, allergy medications such as antihistamines and anaphylaxis treatments may have to be considered to avoid or treat this man-made influenza shock syndrome.

References

1. Smith-Norowitz T a, Wong D, Kusonruksa M, Norowitz KB, Joks R, Durkin HG, et al. Long term persistence of IgE anti-influenza virus antibodies in pediatric and adult serum post vaccination with influenza virus vaccine. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(3):239–44.
2. Davidsson A, Eriksson JC, Rudblad S, Brokstad KA. Influenza specific serum IgE is present in non-allergic subjects. Scand J Immunol. 2005 Dec;62(6):560–1.
3. Nakayama T, Kumagai T, Nishimura N, Ozaki T, Okafuji T, Suzuki E, et al. Seasonal split influenza vaccine induced IgE sensitization against influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2015;
4. Arumugham V. Short sighted influenza control policy based on poorly designed vaccines will sicken more people [Internet]. Available from: https://www.zenodo.org/record/1038445
5. Corporation PS. Flublok Quadrivalent 2017-2018 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedPr...
6. McLean HQ, Thompson MG, Sundaram ME, Meece JK, McClure DL, Friedrich TC, et al. Impact of repeated vaccination on vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) and B during 8 seasons. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(10):1375–85.
7. Yan J, Grantham M, Pantelic J, de Mesquita PJ, Albert B, Liu F, et al. Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. Adamson W, Beato-Arribas B, Bischoff W, Booth W, Cauchemez S, Ehrman S, et al., editors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. National Academy of Sciences; 2018;
8. Joshi AY, Iyer VN, Hartz MF, Patel AM, Li JT. Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study. Allergy asthma Proc. United States; 2012;33(2):e23–7.
9. Koraka P, Murgue B, Deparis X, Setiati TE, Suharti C, Van Gorp ECM, et al. Elevated levels of total and dengue virus-specific immunoglobulin E in patients with varying disease severity. J Med Virol. 2003;70(1):91–8.
10. Tuchinda M, Dhorranintra B, Tuchinda P. Histamine content in 24-hour urine in patients with dengue haemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. Thailand; 1977 Mar;8(1):80–3.

Delight

18th May 2019, 04:38

I am considering that we can use the #noNCVIA to rebrand communication concerning vaccine truth.

MAY 16, 2019
NCVIA: The Legislation that Changed Everything—Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health: Part II (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/ncvia-the-legislation-that-changed-everything-conflicts-of-interest-undermine-childrens-health-part-ii/)

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 freed pharmaceutical companies from liability for injuries resulting from childhood vaccines—“no matter how toxic the ingredients, how negligent the manufacturer or how grievous the harm.”

[Note: This is Part II in a series of articles extracted from the second Children’s Health Defense eBook: Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health. The first eBook, The Sickest Generation: The Facts Behind the Children’s Health Crisis and Why It Needs to End, described how children’s health began to worsen dramatically in the late 1980s following fateful changes in the childhood vaccine schedule.]

By the Children’s Health Defense Team

In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law a piece of legislation called the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), crafted by then-Representative Henry Waxman (now a health industry lobbyist). According to the New York Times, President Reagan “said he had approved the bill ‘with mixed feelings’”—despite his own Justice Department urging him to veto the Act.

With the stroke of a pen, Congress essentially abolished vaccine injury lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers…
The NCVIA radically altered the vaccine policy landscape in the United States. The Act was Congress’s response to intense pressure from vaccine industry lobbyists seeking protection from lawsuits related to the infamously brain-damaging diphtheria, whole-cell pertussis and tetanus (DPT) vaccine. The industry’s lobbying efforts paid off in spades. Replacing judicial action with a more circumscribed “alternative remedy…for specified vaccine-related injuries,” the Act created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), funded by taxpayers through an excise tax on childhood vaccines. With the stroke of a pen, Congress essentially abolished vaccine injury lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers (and health providers), while creating an administrative mechanism (subsequently nicknamed “vaccine court”) from which individuals could seek—but not necessarily obtain—redress for vaccine injuries through “Special Masters” designated to serve as arbiters.

The NCVIA gave pharmaceutical companies what amounted to blanket immunity from liability for injuries resulting from childhood vaccines—“no matter how toxic the ingredients, how negligent the manufacturer or how grievous the harm”—while also exempting companies from the transparency and document discovery normally associated with litigation.

Summarizing the legislation’s far-reaching implications, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has stated: “That extraordinary law eliminated a principal cost associated with making…drugs and left the industry with little economic incentive to make vaccines safe. It also removed lawyers, judges and courts from their traditional roles as guardians of vaccine safety. Since the law’s passage, industry revenues have skyrocketed from $1 billion to $44 billion.”

The NCVIA requires that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) review childhood vaccine safety on a biannual basis and report to Congress on measures taken to improve safety. However, legislators appear to have intended that stipulation largely as window dressing, because—as revealed in a lawsuit filed by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.—HHS officials have never complied with the statutory safety review and reporting requirements even once in over thirty years.

For the most part, however, parents, attorneys, health care professionals and members of the general public are unaware of the NVICP’s existence and, according to HHS, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are ever reported. Thus, NVICP claims represent only the tip of a vast vaccine injury iceberg.
Compensation…for a Few
In the three decades since the NVICP’s creation, American households have filed roughly 20,000 petitions for vaccine injury compensation. The program has paid out over $4 billion to a subset—barely a third (31%)—of petitioners, while dismissing well over half (56%) of filed claims as undeserving of any compensation. Another 12% of petitions remains unadjudicated. Injured parties filed an average of 1,200 claims per year over the last three years, triple the average number of claims filed annually just a few years previously. For the most part, however, parents, attorneys, health care professionals and members of the general public are unaware of the NVICP’s existence and, according to HHS, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are ever reported. Thus, NVICP claims represent only the tip of a vast vaccine injury iceberg.

…the NVICP pits HHS and its subsidiary agencies (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) as adversaries against injured petitioners.
Despite Congress’s professed intent to create a non-adversarial, “accessible and efficient forum for individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines,” in practice, the NVICP pits HHS and its subsidiary agencies (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) as adversaries against injured petitioners. HHS employees are free to decide on or reject compensation claims, and Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers represent and defend the interests of HHS. Petitioners also face a three-year statute of limitations from the time of the vaccine injury and must meet a strenuous burden of proof if—as is almost always the case—their illness, disability, injury or condition does not fall within the narrow parameters of the NVICP’s Vaccine Injury Table.

As set out by the NCVIA, the Vaccine Injury Table was supposed to establish “statutory presumptions of causation” for selected injuries and adverse events occurring within prescribed time periods after vaccination, making the path to compensation less burdensome (at least for those injuries); however, because HHS can—almost at will—“add or delete injuries and conditions for which compensation would be available and…change the applicable time periods by which the onset of symptoms must occur,” the agency has not hesitated to take advantage of this provision to “eliminate avenues to compensation.” Very few new injuries have been added to the Table, despite the large number of vaccines piled onto the childhood schedule since 1986.

HHS and the DOJ have found many ways to limit the number of petitioners awarded compensation. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has called attention to “highly unethical and appallingly consequential official misconduct” exhibited by DOJ lawyers in a 2007-2008 Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP) orchestrated on behalf of 5,400 families who had filed claims for vaccine-induced autism. The claims’ potential value exceeded $100 billion—an amount that “would have bankrupted the [compensation] program many times over.” The DOJ lawyers, under pressure to deprive petitioners of their rightful relief, achieved that aim through allegedly fraudulent means.

In September, 2018, Kennedy, Jr. and Rolf Hazlehurst (one of the OAP parents) requested that the DOJ Inspector General and Congress investigate this fraud and obstruction of justice. In their joint letter, they stated:

“During the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, Department of Justice attorneys…acted in concert with their client, the Department of Health and Human Services, to intentionally misrepresent the opinion of their own expert witness, and to willfully conceal from the vaccine court and petitioners critical material evidence showing how vaccines may cause autism. The same DOJ attorneys subsequently intentionally misled the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. As a result, fraud was ultimately perpetrated upon the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Regulatory Vacuum
The DOJ actions initiated during the OAP had a number of legal spillover effects, culminating in a disastrous (for the vaccine-injured) decision (Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011 that reiterated and even broadened the NCVIA’s basic no-liability premise. In their 2011 majority ruling, Justices asserted that the Act “preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs who seek compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects.” At the time, none of the Justices “had reason to know that HHS was not acting in good faith” nor that DOJ attorneys, in earlier cases, had “conceal[ed] critical material evidence and mis[led] the special masters and the U.S. Court of Appeals.”

In a dissent to the 2011 decision, Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg commented that vaccine manufacturers, “given the lack of robust competition in the vaccine market, will often have little or no incentive to improve the designs of vaccines that are already generating significant profit margins” [emphasis added]. The two Justices predicted—quite accurately—that the Court’s unfortunate decision would leave a “regulatory vacuum” and would make it even harder to strike a balance between “compensating vaccine-injured children and stabilizing the childhood vaccine market.”

Exporting the no-liability model
In 2016, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust—the world’s two wealthiest charitable foundations and two of the biggest global funders of vaccine development and vaccine programs—teamed up with vaccine manufacturers and government partners from a variety of countries to launch the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). According to a recent analysis in the Emory Law Journal, the blanket immunity ushered in by the NCVIA has been so successful for vaccine manufacturers that CEPI is looking to export it, creating “liability protection and compensation mechanisms based on the U.S. model for vaccine liability” around the world.

The law journal author, Professor Mary Holland, cautions that this would be unfortunate for the developing world. In countries that adopt the U.S. model, vaccines are likely to end up being “less safe than they could be,” with an inevitable loss of public confidence “both in vaccines and in those recommending them.”

The next installment of Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health, Part III, will discuss how the NCVIA turned vaccines into a major economic driver of the medical and pharmaceutical industries, sparking a “gold rush” of liability-free vaccine development.

###

[At the time of this article, some states like Minnesota, are requesting that Congress remove pharmaceutical company liability protection for vaccine injury.]

THIS IS EXTRAORDINARY! A petition to
Repeal Immunity for Drug Companies Against Vaccine Injuries (https://petitions.moveon.org/sign/repeal-immunity-for-drug)

is blocked by MoveOn

MoveOn volunteers reviewed this petition and determined that it either may not reflect MoveOn members' progressive values, or that MoveOn members may disagree about whether to support this petition. MoveOn will not promote the petition beyond hosting it on our site. Click here (https://act.moveon.org/cms/thanks/thanks-your-input) if you think MoveOn should support this petition.

Delight

18th May 2019, 04:51

Trying to comprehend what is happening with us people???????.........

The Disintegrated Mind: The Greatest Threat to Human Survival on Earth
By TLB Contributor: Robert J. Burrowes

Like many people who have struggled to understand why human beings are driving the sixth mass extinction event in Earth’s history, which now threatens imminent human extinction as well, over many decades I have explored the research and efforts of a great many activists and scholars to secure this understanding. However, with many competing ideas from the fields of politics, economics, sociology and psychology, among others, this understanding has proved elusive. Nevertheless, I have reached an understanding that I find compelling: Human beings are driving the sixth mass extinction event in Earth’s history because of the disintegrated nature of the human mind.

While the expression ‘mental disintegration’ has been used in a number of contexts previously, for the purpose of my discussion in this article I am going to redefine it, explain how it originates, describe several ways in which it manifests behaviorally and the profoundly dysfunctional outcomes this generates, and suggest what we can do about it.

Given that the expression, as I am using it, describes a shocking psychological state but also one that is so widespread it afflicts virtually everyone, it can be described as posing the greatest threat to human survival on Earth. Why? Simply because it caused – and now prevents virtually everyone from thinking, feeling, planning and behaving functionally in response to – the multifaceted threats to humanity and the biosphere.

So, for the purpose of this article: Mental disintegration describes a state in which the various parts of the human mind are no longer capable of working as an integrated unit. That is, each part of the mind – such as memory, thoughts, feelings, sensing capacities (sight, hearing…), ‘truth register’, conscience – function largely independently of each other, rather than as an integrated whole. The immediate outcome of this dysfunction is that human behaviour lacks consideration, conviction, courage and strategy, and is simply driven compulsively by the predominant fear in each context.

The reason this issue first attracted my attention was because, on many occasions, I observed individuals (ranging from people I knew, to politicians) behaving in ways that seemed outrageous but it was also immediately apparent that the individual was completely unaware of the outrageous nature of their behaviour. On the contrary, it seemed perfectly appropriate to them. With the passage of time, however, I have observed this dysfunctionality in an enormously wide variety of more subtle and common forms, making me realise just how widespread it is even if it goes largely unrecognized. After all, if virtually everyone does it in particular contexts, then why should it be considered ‘abnormal’?

One version of this mental disintegration is the version usually known as ‘cognitive dissonance’. The widely accepted definition of this state, based on Leon Festinger’s research in the 1950s, goes something like this: Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that we have an inner drive to hold all of our attitudes, beliefs, values and behavior in harmony and to avoid disharmony (or dissonance). This is known as the principle of cognitive consistency. When there is an inconsistency between attitudes, beliefs and/or values on the one hand and behaviors on the other (dissonance), something must change to eliminate the dissonance.

The problem with this approach to the issue is that it assumes awareness of the inconsistency on the part of the individual impacted and also assumes (based on Festinger’s research) that there is some inclination to seek consistency. But my own observations of a vast number of people in a substantial variety of contexts over several decades have clearly revealed that, in very many contexts, individuals have no awareness of any discrepancy and, hence, have no inclination to seek consistency between their attitude, belief and/or value and their behavior. Moreover, even if they do have some awareness of the inconsistency, most people simply act on the basis of their predominant emotion – usually fear – in the context and pass it off with a rationalization. For example, that their particular work/role is so important that it justifies their excessive consumption on a planet of limited and unequally shared resources.

Consequently, to choose an obvious example, most climate, environmental, anti-nuclear and anti-war activists fail to grapple meaningfully with the obvious contradiction between their own over-consumption of fossil fuels and resources generally and the role that consumption of these resources plays in driving the climate and environmental catastrophes as well as war. The idea of reducing their own personal consumption is beyond serious contemplation (let alone action). And, of course, it goes without saying that the global elite suffers this disintegration of the mind by failing to connect their endless acquisition of power, profit and privilege at the expense of all others and the Earth, with the accelerating and multifaceted threats to human survival including the future of their own children. But the examples are endless.

In any case, leaving aside ‘cognitive dissonance’, there are several types of mental disintegration as I define it in this article. Let me briefly give you five examples of mental disintegration before explaining why it occurs.

1. Denial is an unconscious mental state in which an individual, having been given certain information about themselves, others they know or the state of the world, deny the information because it frightens them. This is what happens for a ‘climate denier’, for example. For a fuller explanation, see ‘The Psychology of Denial’.

2. The ‘Magic Rat’ is an unconscious mental state in which a person’s fear makes them incapable of grappling with certain information, even to deny it, so they completely suppress their awareness of the information immediately they receive it. For four examples of this psychological phenomenon, which President Trump exemplifies superbly, see ‘You Cannot Trap the “Magic Rat”: Trump, Congress and Geopolitics’.

3. Delusion is an unconscious mental state in which a person is very frightened by certain information but the nature of the circumstances make it impossible to either deny or suppress awareness of the information so they are compelled to construct a delusion in relation to that particular reality in order to feel safe. For a fuller explanation, see ‘The Delusion “I Am Not Responsible”’.

4. Projection is an unconscious mental state in which a person is very frightened of knowing a terrifying truth so they ‘defend’ themselves against becoming aware of this truth by (unconsciously) identifying a more palatable cause for their fear and then ‘defending’ themselves against this imagined ‘threat’. Political leaders in Israel do this chronically in relation to the Palestinians, for example. But the US elite also does this chronically in relation to any competing ideas in relation to political and economic organization in other countries. See ‘The Psychology of Projection in Conflict’.

5. Lies arise from a conscious or unconscious mental state in which a person fears blame and/or punishment for telling an unpalatable truth (such as one that will self-incriminate) so they unconsciously employ tactics, including lying, to avoid this blame and punishment (and thus project the blame onto others). When people lie unconsciously, it means they are lying to themself as well; that is, constructing a lie without awareness that they are doing so. For a fuller explanation, see ‘Why Do People Lie? And Why Do Other People Believe Them?’
continued here (https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/the-disintegrated-mind-the-greatest-threat-to-human-survival-on-earth/)

Delight

19th May 2019, 01:12

This thread has had over 1300 viewers, some 23% of whom were Avalon members, and the rest guests. It is averaging between 60 and 100 distinct viewers (distinct IP addresses) per day.

I wonder who is reading these posts?

This gentleman Mark Blaxill is IMO presenting an over view that is clear and valuable. He personally wants what I want

1. CHOICE to decide what we want for our health (vaccinate or NOT) and laws that protect people not corporations
2. Informed Consent based on real evolving scientific evidence (which we do not have now)
3. A Free Market that lets the corporations take on their liability. The free market will not "accept" the slew of vaccines mandated. The corporate model needs to force us because it recognizes people don't want too many vaccinations, too soon and with a high probability of serious bad unintended consequences.
4. Call out the swamp of incestuous relationships in our public health and the government/ corporate collusion in all policies.

wmoZDgXYYec

Delight

19th May 2019, 05:54

More from John Bergman.

fQ-tOIW4ZAM

Every talk brings out more information but no solutions. I think that perhaps removing the corporate protection from liability could be a rallying cry.

I agree with this comment

I think part of the deep seated reason that people can't accept that vaccines aren't safe and effective is the same as why it's so important to demonize people who disagree as heretic anti-vaxxers.

It's because to realize that they aren't safe and effective, and to see that the government knows this, removes liability, and forces it violently and with great consequence means that people have to then realize that their government is very likely completely evil.

How can they participate in their favorite political team sport(red vs blue, donkey mascot vs elephant mascot)?

How can they continue with their comfortable apathy knowing this is happening? How can they just go on "living a quiet life" knowing something like this is landing on them?

How can they support the troops and believe we're number 1 because we have the most freedoms?

I don't think anyone can realize what's going on without being compelled to question just about everything. (Jeff L.)

There were a few thoughtful comments. I like this one but know it won't happen. The medical community is protected also under the 1986 law releasing liability.

Since we can't hold the big companies liable, what if we could find a way to have those individuals administering the vaccines held totally liable for any "side effects", kinda like the Geneva Convention held soldiers responsible for following orders. Make it mandatory that anyone giving these shots has to first read in full, in the office, the entire vaccine insert to every patient before administration. Then the person has to sign a contract with the patient to be totally responsible for any illnesses the patient may get over say the next 5 years. If nothing else, there would be a lot less people willing to give the shots. (Glenn Daniel)

This is about Antoine Bechamp.

Anyone who does even a slight study of Antoine Bechamp's absolute honest science will discover that #1, proteins injectected into the bloodstream can and will cause untold damage to the whole biological system.... they must first be processed through the digestive sytem. The blood and immune system can not handle whole protjens. #2, Cells from one organ injected into another organ, even within the same person, can and will likely cause serious reactions. #3, Cells injected from one specie into a different specie can and will cause serious reactions. #4, Injection with diseased cells into a healthy person will not create immunity.
#5, Measils vaccine at a young age interferes with natural measil fighting immunity and delays the normal development of that immunity until later when the more mature immune system either develops the disease at a problematic age and/or suffers other maladies. The reasons for all 5 above, Bechamp and other honest researchers since Bechamp proved, is because cells are organ specific and specie specific....consequent reactions will be lifelong....wheather readily apparent or not. Thus all vaccines are dangerous to good health. Luis Pasteur, who was a contemporary of Bechamp, plagiarized and twisted Bechamp's research for his own gain and fame and to comply with his MASTERS, the allopathic medical industry and the drug companies at that time. No money in Bechamp's true science. Re interpret his findings so as to facilitate moneymaking. Injury to populations is irrelevant and in fact creates more moneymaking opportunities from reactions, immediate or delayed.(John Smith)

Others who were cognizant of the idea that disease is a disturbance of "hygiene" knew

As Florence Nightingale put it: “There are no specific diseases, there are specific disease conditions”.

Pasteur himself, in one of the most quoted deathbed statements perhaps of all time, recanted the Germ Theory and admitted that his rivals had been right, and that it was not the germ that caused the disease, but rather the environment in which the germ was found: “Bernard acail raison; le terrain c’est tout, le germe c’est rien.” He was referencing his nemesis Claude Bernard, a proponent of the Terrain Theory and contemporary of Antoine Béchamp.The Fallacious Germ Theory
April 24, 2013
JoeDubs (https://joedubs.com/the-fallacious-germ-theory/)

Pasteur vs Béchamp: The Germ Theory Debate
by Kate Raines
Published February 6, 2018 | Medicine, History (https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/02/pasteur-vs-bechamp-the-germ-theory-debate/)

Louis Pasteur’s “germ theory of disease” remains the basis of Western medicine, considering that disease is caused by specific microorganisms that invade the body from outside.
Antoine Béchamp believed instead that illness stems from an unhealthy system that triggered changes in minute particles of the body that lead to disease.
Western medicine has fully embraced germ theory and its dependence on drugs to treat symptoms, effectively minimizing the importance of nutritious food, fresh air, hygiene and sanitation.
“Louis Pasteur was a French chemist-turned-microbiologist, who proved the existence of microbes in air. His pioneering studies laid the foundation for the modern-day understanding of diseases, their etiology as well as vaccine development.”1

How that quotation is interpreted—whether as high praise or condemnation—depends on the perspective. Pasteur was not the only scientist who delved into the origins of disease. While he focused on the influence of invading microbes, or what has come to be known as the “germ theory,” his rival Antoine Béchamp, one of the period’s preeminent scientists, was promoting a different theory. Béchamp’s theory, referred to as the “microzymian” theory of disease, has since become known as the “cellular,”2 or “host”3 theory.4

By all accounts, Béchamp was a highly respected scientist whose teachings were accepted as fact by many of Pasteur’s contemporaries.5 So how is it that relatively few people today have even heard the name of Antoine Béchamp and that it is Louis Pasteur’s scientific conclusions that form much of the basis of contemporary medical thinking about infectious disease?

Origins of Germ Theory
The germ theory of disease holds that “specific microscopic organisms are the cause of specific diseases,” a statement that is so pervasive today that it seems self-evident. Historically, however, variations of the germ theory had been around for hundreds of years but had never taken hold. It was not until Pasteur’s work became publicized in the 19th century that it gained widespread acceptance. Reducing the idea of disease to a simple interaction between specific microorganisms and a host, the germ theory minimized the role of environmental factors on illness, conveniently dismissing social responsibility for disease, especially among the poor.

The work of Pasteur and his associates led directly to the acceptance of vaccines by “leading medical scientists—those longing for a sound and simple explanation for the inexplicable.”6

Host (Cellular) Theory Philosophy
Béchamp’s view was that disease-causing germs were essentially altered microzymas… a term he gave to minute particles he considered to be the common stuff of all living things capable of adapting to changing conditions in the body.7 Quoted as saying, “The microzyma is at the beginning and end of all organization. It is the fundamental anatomical element whereby the cellules, the tissues, the organs, the whole of an organism are constituted,”8 Béchamp maintained that disease developed in the presence of an unhealthy environment caused by an unbalanced state in the body. He held that disease could not take hold without a preexisting weakness.9

As summarized and greatly simplified by author Walene James10—and ridiculed by Mark Crislip11 in Science-Based Medicine—Béchamp’s basic message was that:

Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
These intracellular microorganisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
Microrganisms change their shapes and colours to reflect the medium.
Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
Microorganisms become “pathogenic” as the health of the host organism. deteriorates. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
To prevent disease we have to create health.
Among those who rejected germ theory, instead championing the influence of diet, climate, ventilation, hygiene and sanitation in causing disease were Florence Nightingale and Rudolf Virchow.

Rudolf Virchow, an early opponent of the germ theory of disease, believed that germs do not cause disease but instead gravitate to the diseased area as scavengers, to feed on and clean up the dead tissue caused by the pathogenic process. Virchow stated in his later years, “If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat—diseased tissues—rather than causing disease.”12

Western Medicine Rules
Western medicine fiercely protects the germ theory of disease, scorning and dismissing Béchamp’s ideas out of hand. There is no doubt that much of what Béchamp was able to determine has been supplanted now by scientific resources unavailable to him at his time, but that can also be said of Pasteur’s theories. Such a narrow view of disease misses the gist of Béchamp’s teachings: the importance of supporting a strong internal defense system to ward off disease and attain true health rather than relying on drugs and vaccines as a sledgehammer to treat symptoms and attempt to destroy germs.

Many disease-causing microbes are normally present in the body and do not cause disease as a matter of course but are kept at bay in people who have healthy immune systems. Other infectious microbes can spread from person to person via water, air, insect bites or exposure to infected body fluids and have the potential to cause serious complications in an immune compromised host.

The Differences Between the Germ Theory, the
Terrain Theory and the Germ Terrrain Duality
Theory (https://juniperpublishers.com/jojnhc/pdf/JOJNHC.MS.ID.555631.pdf)

ThePythonicCow

19th May 2019, 14:21

Delight

19th May 2019, 18:00

Pasteur vs Béchamp: The Germ Theory Debate
by Kate Raines
Published February 6, 2018 | Medicine, History (https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/02/pasteur-vs-bechamp-the-germ-theory-debate/)
...
Rudolf Virchow, an early opponent of the germ theory of disease, believed that germs do not cause disease but instead gravitate to the diseased area as scavengers, to feed on and clean up the dead tissue caused by the pathogenic process. Virchow stated in his later years, “If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat—diseased tissues—rather than causing disease.”

Terrorists - the political equivalent of germs.

Terrorists do not thrive in healthy communities.

https://darknessrevisited.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/tyranny.png

The "totalitarian tiptoe" ... destroys healthy communities,
as big ag, chem and pharma destroy healthy bodies.

I saw this comment about 5G testing from DaveTwo on the "Stop 5G before it's irreversible!" here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-&p=1291484&viewfull=1#post1291484)

(commentary from the documentary Generation Zapped... thanks Dave)

29:50
"We were sort of caught in a difficult place. Because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been pre-market testing, cellphones never would have made it into the marketplace.

So what happened was through some lobbying efforts and when the Telecommunication Act was finally passed, the EPA's RF Program was de-funded. We didn't like what they were saying so let's get rid of them. And that's what happened. "

These are two incredibly damning statements that Carlo (Dr. George Carlo: Former Chairman Wireless Technology Research 1996) made.
In the first he stated clearly that the government dropped the ball and chose not to test the cellphones before bringing them to market. He said had they done the testing for health effects we wouldn't have cellphones today (or at least not the harmful ones we now have).

Secondly he said the EPA were starting to find negative health effects but the cellphone industry + Wireless Technology Research didn't like that and managed to shut down the EPA's RF Program!

I was thinking a great deal last night about my strong confusion about What To DO? now that I am feeling galvanized by my realization that as Horrible as it seems and as "paranoid", this is an all out experimentation (in rolling out these corporate terrors with no testing for safety) backed by a totalitarian authority that is coming from all sides of the political spectrum. The politicians all take corporate funds (http://allaregreen.us/) and all the various corporate interests form a hideous and deadly sticky gelatinous blob of power and control. According to Jon Rappoport it is an "evolving" cooperation. There is no "place" to run towards as it is global. There is no place to turn towards that I can see which would powerfully unite the seeming separate issues people feel passion concerning.

When people reference the Nuremberg Code, one must recognize that it never was codified as "law"

On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed little from previous American or German ones. Furthermore they showed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation. This argument worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, American doctors who had worked with the prosecution during the trial. On April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes which outlined six points defining legitimate research. The verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments" and revised the original six points into ten. Subsequently, the ten points became known as the "Nuremberg Code." Although the code addressed the defense arguments in general, remarkably none of the specific findings against Brandt and his codefendants mentioned the code. Thus the legal force of the document was not well established. The uncertain use of the code continued in the half century following the trial when it informed numerous international ethics statements but failed to find a place in either the American or German national law codes. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the "Doctors Trial."https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code

The Matrix Revealed: Cartels That Run The World
by Jon Rappoport (https://nomorefakenews.com/)
The following information comes from insider interviews with Ellis Medavoy and Richard Bell, two people I interview extensively in my collection, The Matrix Revealed. This is just a brief taste of what they have to say...

Major institutions on this planet that control Military, Money, Energy, Government, Medical, Corporate, Media, and Education are becoming, more and more, global cartels, horizontally integrated across national borders.

This is more than a top-down command process. It's organically evolving. Three steps forward, two steps back. There is a great deal of competition among the components of a given cartel, but there is also cooperation. And in the long run, the see-saw is tipping in the direction of cooperation, as these entities realize they may well have more to gain that way.

I can't stress too strongly this EVOLVING process. All attempts to merely assume twelve men in a room run the planet fall woefully short.

Instead, over time, people who lead a powerful institution (like Energy, for example) look out and recognize more major players, and in this recognition there is an impulse to compete and win and destroy, but there is also an impulse to build commonality and therefore monopolize the entire territory.

During one conversation with retired master propagandist Ellis Medavoy, I asked him about the extent of mutual cooperation in his given field, psychological warfare. He responded:

"Twenty years ago, I would have said we were all operating separately and jealously. Each of us was mining his own contacts and building his false pictures of reality for the masses. But then things began to change. Globally. First of all, more of us were pushing the same holograms. And because communication and travel were speeding up so rapidly, we were working a lot of the same venues. We would run into each other more often. We began to share information. I mean, it was cautious. We weren't gushing with unbridled love, I assure you. The competitive factor was still strong. And we had fights. But through all that, we began to see through the fog, so to speak. We began to understand the effectiveness of cooperating. We would test each other with privileged information, to see if we could trust each other to keep it private. A tidbit here, a tidbit there.

"And you see, behind us, other groups were finding commonality, too. For example, in the area of medical propaganda, where I operated a lot of the time. And these groups saw they could join together for specific operations, on an international scale. They could push enormous lies globally, and everyone of their class would profit and gain wider control. So I would find myself working with a psy warfare guy from, say, France, or Germany in a joint venture. We would rub elbows. We'd be feeding from the same basic money trough.

"We'd both be briefed by a team of intelligence experts, and those experts would be of several nationalities. Slowly, I saw a new kind of umbrella structure emerging.

"See, suppose during the secret lead-up to a planned economic crisis [money cartel], you can distract everybody with a phony epidemic [medical cartel]. Do you see? Leaders perceive a reason to cooperate. Planners become more intelligent and clever. They reach across lines they never would have reached across before...

"You begin to see the outlines of a much more inclusive future structure. This is multi-front warfare."

Richard Bell, another former insider, said to me: "People like to assume that money is everything. If you can limit the amount of money the public has, eventually they weaken and cave in and they're easier to control. And this is certainly true. But on the other hand, as mega-corporations gain more power and range and markets, you have a clash, because those corporations, which are now cooperating in ways they never have, as a cartel in some respects, want customers for their products. They don't want abject poverty across the board. People have to be able to buy their products.

"So there is a heavy conflict. It's a conflict between elite bankers [money cartel] and mega-corporations [corporation cartel]. It needs to be resolved through advance planning, over the long term. So now you have these powerful men sitting down and talking in a new way. Other big-time players get involved, too [government, media, energy cartels, for example]."

This is just the beginning of what these people have to say about the Matrix in their interviews and how it REALLY works.

Personally I am still looking for a way to channel my sense that I know I love Freedom and that this means it must be something that allows all to experience freedom.

I love health and this IMO is about the terrain because that makes sense to me based on new science like epigenetics (the relationship between the "cell" and the environment activating physical expression).

I love Consciousness which IMO is the driving "metaphysical" essence behind form.

In the long run I KNOW I don't understand the "point" of life? I know I think and feel and I am here now. People also have their experiences. There seem to be some IMPORTANT common needs and IMO we might set aside all the apparent differnces to come en masse to what will support the lives we choose.

I am posting this because I can do that. (Thanks PA for the "free speech"!!!!!!!)I would love to hear from others who have some ideas of a uniting plan we can act on. If we find some powerful reason TOGETHER, IMO we could zap the blob because
it is IMO TESTING TO SEE IF WE WILL LET IT ROLL ON OVER US!

Sandy123

19th May 2019, 18:35

Thalidomide a drug given to pregnant mothers for morning sickness. The drug caused severe malformations for 20,000 newborns and thousands of miscarriages. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/14/-sp-thalidomide-pill-how-evaded-justice
A trial started in 1970 against the pharmaceutical company Grunenthal and 9 of the research doctors. During the war quite a few of the doctors had worked in the Nazi camps experimenting on the prisioners. After the war they went to work for Grunenthal. The non-executive chairman was Otto Ambros, one of the inventors of the nerve gas sarin, and in charge of the construction of the Auschwitz IG Farben plant. Dr Martin Staemmler, one of the top people in the Nazi racial hygiene and eugenics setup also was employed there. The doctors in the labor camp gave experimental vaccines and many prisoners died. Their "research" was very immoral and evil.
Many researchers, physicians and pharmaceutical company's came to America after the war and continued on with genetic and vaccine testing. Our own gov't was happy to employ them.
The psychological use of propaganda also was brought over from the Nazi regime. I can see it working so well here in the U.S. where people against vaccines are demonized. The hysteria and emotions are ramped up so high.
I read recently where they are working on vaccines that are put into the air we breathe.
We are still the ginea pigs, it hasn't stopped.

onawah

19th May 2019, 18:39

I just made a suggestion to Omi, facilitator of the Intentional Mediation thread starting here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?101306-Intentional-MEDITATION-Group-Sharing&p=1201436&viewfull=1#post1201436
...that Avalon meditators do some focused meditations for Julian Assange, who is being treated despicably now in a high security prison in the UK.
If more wanted to join that meditation group and focus on particular issues such as vaccines, I think that could be worthwhile and effective.

In the long run I KNOW I don't understand the "point" of life? I know I think and feel and I am here now. People also have their experiences. There seem to be some IMPORTANT common needs and IMO we might set aside all the apparent differnces to come en masse to what will support the lives we choose.

I am posting this because I can do that. (Thanks PA for the "free speech"!!!!!!!)I would love to hear from others who have some ideas of a uniting plan we can act on. If we find some powerful reason TOGETHER, IMO we could zap the blob because
it is IMO TESTING TO SEE IF WE WILL LET IT ROLL ON OVER US!

Delight

19th May 2019, 19:11

Forced Vaccination is a violation against civil rights. It is violence and leads to trauma. Many sources have detailed that the human race is bedeviled by generational trauma which is probably IMO the biggest and most effective way that we are civilized to be fearful and to accept authority.

fRIX-782u_I

I am not the only one to think that injections themselves are violent and abusive to children.

April Boden: The Emotional Trauma of Vaccination
May 27, 2015
by Leslie Carol Botha
(https://holyhormones.com/april-boden/)
Autism mom and brilliant woman, April Boden just wrote this article about the emotional feature/ trauma of vaccination.

Childhood Trauma Leads to Brains Wired for Fear

“Children’s brains are literally shaped by traumatic experiences, which can lead to problems with anger, addiction, and even criminal activity in adulthood.”

Bessel van der Kolk, author of the recently published book, The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma.

How can we not even consider this trauma to our infants? How would they even know how to respond to the pain of vaccination and the side affects? Does this put them under a lot of emotional stress? In another article that came out this week on stress and the body entitled: From The Brain To The Immune System, How Stress Pirates Your Whole Body, the author states:

But acute stress and chronic stress can invoke a sense of danger — and some serious effects on the body. From crying to sweating, panic attacks to mental breakdowns — and even physical illness — relentless anxiety can swing a person into a tizzy.

Trauma, stress- re-wiring of the brain at infancy? Adding a ‘toxic soup” of chemicals, heavy metals, foreign DNA to our children’s body? Another aspect of the vaccine issue that we have not considered in is the bacteria from our skin that gets into the bloodstream when the vax needle breaks our skin. Oh, you say the arm is swabbed with an antiseptic? Really? And do you want those chemicals in your bloodstream as well?

What are we doing to our children?

What are we doing to the mother’s of newborn children?

How are we traumatizing them? They are the ones who are told by the doctors to hold their children down while they are being injected with these chemical cocktails. They are the ones who are watching this assault on an infant, unable to give informed consent to what is happening to them.

How many women carry guilt, trauma and stress around for the rest of their lives.

Vaccines – in the name of what greater good?

The Emotional Trauma of Vaccination!
by April Boden
May 2, 2015

Reprinted with permission

April Boden and babyI never thought about emotional trauma in relation to autism until the first time we went to a homeopath. I remember her asking about how I ‘felt’ during pregnancy and how I ‘felt’ about my baby postpartum. I explained the pre-natal and hospital birth trauma though she persisted that there must be something more. Despite her attempt to assure me there would be ‘no judgment’, I remember feeling irritated as if she didn’t believe me when I said that I did in fact feel very bonded to my baby. I felt bonded to him despite the fact that the doctor who delivered him was a monster, despite the fact my pre-natal experience had been unnecessarily physically and emotionally stressful, despite the fact that due to hospital atrocity and incompetence they gave my baby formula, before I was able to breastfeed him and continued to keep him from me for 6 hours… Looking at it with fresh eyes, I can see where she might have thought I would have trouble with the bonding process and I have no doubt given that birthing in America is almost always extremely traumatic, that many women do feel detached.. But I didn’t feel that way at all. I loved Aydan immediately. I always found him delightful. I remember him as a wee little baby before the vaccines robbed him of his potential… when he still felt good in his own skin, when he enjoyed being in and exploring the world. I remember waking early in the morning and how we found it ironic that his initials were A.M. (Aydan Michael), since he seemed to be such an early riser. I would pop in my Mommy and me yoga VHS tape and start my work-out, even if he was still asleep.. Predictably as I turned it on, he would climb out of the bed that we shared and crawl to the next room where I was beginning my stretches.. I can still see his bright smile with big dimples as he rounded the corner, as if to say ‘I’m ready to play…’ I was happy when he woke up. In yoga, I used his body as a weight.. lifting him above my head and resting on my legs. We laughed a lot and had fun!

But lately, I’ve been thinking about the emotional trauma.

By now it is clear that vaccines are a toxic soup that reek havoc on every aspect of our bodies… This is where the DAN (Defeat Autism Now) and most of the natural health community has laid its focus. How to remove the toxins? How to seal the leaky gut? What therapies does the child need? What vitamin deficiencies need addressing? And on and on… But what about the emotional trauma of vaccination?

When my 7 month old daughter meets a new person, even a loving Grandma, she is apprehensive. When Grandma goes to pick her up, she anxiously looks at me on the verge of tears, as if to say ‘mom, is this okay?’ ‘Am I safe?’ I smile at her and assure Grandma’s a good one. After a few loving attempts, she realizes she is safe and the anxiety subsides.. This got me thinking.. I wonder if when in the doctor’s office, did my son, Aydan, look to me as an infant wanting to know the same? Did he look for reassurance, as if to ask ‘Mom, am I safe?’ Did he do this, as I handed him over to this doctor or nurse, who unlike Grandma took him without love into their arms, forcing him down on a table of cold and synthetic material, then proceeded to inject him with a sharp metal object laced with poison? Did he think ‘mom is this okay?’ ‘will I be okay?’ and did I look at him with terror and tears in my eyes, as I always feared the needle… I instinctively understood it was wrong for anything, anyone, under any circumstances to hurt my child.. As I ignored this instinct, could he read it on my face? I know, I told him ‘it would be okay..’ I didn’t mean to lie but deep down, I knew it was wrong.

I also didn’t mean to omit this information when I talked to the homeopath because though our bond may still be strong, our trust had been broken. Over the years since the vaccine assault… The rape that took place before my very eyes.. It has been a barrage of blood tests, urine/stool analysis, enemas, chelation treatments, supplements that didn’t work, MB12 injections… Countless offices with doctors, therapists, institutionalized schools, assessments, people who come and go… cause they aren’t family, they aren’t friends.. they are staff.

So at this time, I’d like to address Aydan, though he may not understand everything I’m about to say, he probably understands more than I know and perhaps someday he will understand it all…

“Dear Aydan,

My son I find this letter very difficult to write, as I am about to talk about things that are very uncomfortable for me to admit.

I don’t know if you remember being a baby like your sister but when you were little like her, I took you to a place where people hurt you. They injected you with a sharp object that had stuff inside (poison) and that stuff made you sick. It would change the rest of your life and that is why you have a hard time trying to speak. That is why sometimes you feel confused. That is why you get stomach aches and why your body hurts. I want to make it very clear to you that this didn’t happen because you were bad or because you were different or defective. I allowed this to be done to you because I was ignorant and didn’t trust myself as your mother. I am sorry that I failed to protect you.

I don’t know if you remember the first day of school when you were 3 years old but I remember the first 2 weeks where I walked you to the gate and the teachers took your hand. You looked at me with fear and cried. I know you didn’t want to go and I don’t want you to think that I left you there because I didn’t want to be with you. I left you there because I was afraid I wouldn’t be able to help you on my own and I didn’t know where else to turn. I’m sorry that I did that too.

I remember when you were 5 and someone gave you a shirt that said ‘I’m not autistic, I’m autastic!’ You hated that shirt and always wanted to take it off. I recall the day, I put it on you, as you were crying and trying to keep it away.. I looked at you and told you I understood that you hated the shirt and didn’t want to wear it. I said that I would throw it away and you would never have to wear it again. I threw it away in front of you and you seemed happy about it. I want you to know that you were right to hate that shirt. You were right to know that it wasn’t cute or funny.

And Aydan, when you are outside in the world, with all those groups of people or ‘society’ and those people look at you strange or tell you to calm down or be quiet; I hope that you know that this does not mean there is anything wrong with you. The only reason we adults say things like that is because we are ashamed of the fact that we have allowed you and other children like you to be hurt.

As I write this you are 10 years old and though you are a big boy now, I hope it is not too late to re-gain the bond of trust that has been broken between us.

I know that you know, I love you, since I tell you at least 5 times a day and I remember before that sharp needle of poison took your words away, you told me once too.

Sincerely,

Mom

PS – I can still remember an incident from my childhood that terrorized me at the time. I was visiting my grandparents with my family and somehow was bitten by a dog on my leg. I was traumatized to begin with – in addition to feeling my parent’s trauma as I was whisked off to a hospital – more trauma – I was examined and then to my utmost dismay – I was lying down (face down) with my pants down and my buttocks exposed – not knowing what was happening. More trauma. And then injected with a tetanus without even knowing what was happening. I remember crying from the pain – and the stress and tension from the whole situation.

Do you have a story to share?

"The ‘magic rat’ is simply the mechanism by which an unconscious and terrified mind instantly switches its attention from something frightening to something more pleasant to avoid having any time to consciously engage with the presented information."

You Cannot Trap the ‘Magic Rat’: Trump, Congress and Geopolitics
Robert J. Burrowes (https://www.nationofchange.org/2017/08/09/cannot-trap-magic-rat-trump-congress-geopolitics/)

A wonderful thing about observing and analyzing the human mind is that there is a seemingly infinite variety of phenomena to observe and analyze. I sometimes wonder if it is even remotely possible to master this subject but, even if it is not, at least it provides an unending source of ‘entertainment’.

The phenomenon that I want to discuss in this article is what Anita McKone and I call the ‘magic rat’.

Before proceeding, let me emphasize that the ‘magic rat’ is an incredibly dangerous psychological disorder that afflicts most political and virtually all corporate leaders, notably including those in the United States, thus rendering them incapable of responding intelligently and appropriately to the ongoing crises in human affairs. And, tragically, it afflicts most other people too, which is one reason why it is difficult to muster a strategic response to these crises, even at grassroots level.

In describing this disorder, I also want to emphasize that it never occurs in isolation. Individuals afflicted by this disorder will invariably have a multiplicity of other disorders too, not necessarily labeled ‘disorders’ in the psychological literature.

So what is the ‘magic rat’, and why can’t it be trapped?

When a human being is terrified to consider a particular fact or set of facts, their mind has an enormous variety of unconscious mechanisms for preventing them from doing so. The most obvious version of this phenomenon which has been identified is known as ‘denial’. See ‘The Psychology of Denial’.

However, the ‘magic rat’ is a different phenomenon which most humans routinely use (unconsciously) to avoid having to respond to frightening circumstances. The nature of these frightening circumstances varies from one individual to the next although patterns can be readily observed in many contexts.

In 2003, Anita had a dream in which a rat was running around and I was chasing it and hitting it with an iron bar. However, each time that I appeared to land a blow on the rat, the rat simply disappeared and reappeared somewhere else. And so my chase resumed. I just couldn’t pin it down.

This psychological phenomenon is readily observed and many people will be able to recall this from their own experience. The ‘magic rat’ occurs when someone is given information that terrifies them. It is important to understand that their fear is unlikely to be readily displayed and it will often be concealed behind some behaviour, such as an apparently ‘rational’ argument or ‘off-hand’ comment in response, or perhaps even a joke.

The frightening information might be personal but it might just as readily be information of any other kind, such as in relation to something that happened historically or about the state of the world. What matters is that the person to whom the information is presented is (unconsciously) terrified by it and responds (again unconsciously) by employing the ‘magic rat’.

The ‘magic rat’ is simply the mechanism by which an unconscious and terrified mind instantly switches its attention from something frightening to something more pleasant to avoid having any time to consciously engage with the presented information. The switch happens instantaneously precisely because the person is so terrified by the information that their mind takes their attention away from it in a moment. If their mind did not do this, the person would be compelled to consider the information and to respond to it.

As Anita and I discussed this phenomenon recently, we could easily recall four different responses by the ‘magic rat’ that we have observed. In no particular order, the first response is for the terrified person’s unconscious mind to shut out the frightening information so effectively that it might well have never been uttered/written; they then proceed as if it had not been.

The second response is for the person frightened by the information to instantly switch the topic of discussion to something else that feels safe (so that they do not have to engage with the information). In some contexts, this might look like a ‘rational’ response but, in fact, closer examination will reveal that their response is irrelevant to the issue raised previously. This version is probably the most difficult to identify simply because most of us have learned to largely ignore what we probably (but incorrectly) perceive as ‘red herrings’.

The third response is to ‘throw out smoke bombs’, as Anita describes it, so that the whole issue is clouded by distractive ‘noise’ designed to distract the attention of the person/people presenting the information in the first place so that they are lured into discussing a less frightening subject. These ‘smoke bombs’ can take many forms, including introducing irrelevant information to confuse you or offering a sarcastic comment as the preliminary to any response (which, of course, will be wide of the subject).

The fourth response is to attack you verbally or physically, because your information is considered an attack on them against which they must immediately and aggressively defend themselves. This version of the problem is sometimes labeled ‘kill the messenger’.

There are no doubt other versions of the ‘magic rat’: what matters is that the person in question is so frightened that they find a way to avoid dealing with the issue that makes them scared.

The purpose of the ‘magic rat’ mechanism is to enable an individual to remain feeling safe in the delusion that they have created for themselves and it is vital that the truth does not penetrate this delusion.

Why would an individual want to (unconsciously) use a delusion to feel safe? For the simple reason that, as a child, the individual never felt safe but was also never given any time or the necessary conditions to both feel this fear while feeling safe, and to actually be safe for most of the time. So because evolution did not equip any individual to live in a permanent state of feeling terrified, the child has no ‘choice’ but to (unconsciously) generate a delusional sense of safety in the unsafe environment. Once the child has done this, however, the delusional state becomes ‘permanent’ and is ‘defended’, both consciously and unconsciously depending on the context, using mechanisms such as the ‘magic rat’ described above.

So is this problem very prevalent? Unfortunately, it is ‘everywhere’. For instance, if you take the information I have presented above and consider this the next time you listen to or read something from Donald Trump, you will have an excellent opportunity to observe and identify the ways in which his mind routinely uses ‘magic rats’ to avoid dealing with reality. See, for example, his decisions in relation to the environment and climate, summarised in ‘A Running List of How Trump Is Changing Environmental Policy’. You might also ponder the extraordinary violence that this man suffered, as a child, at the hands of those adults who were supposed to love him. In addition, you might consider the phenomenal danger to humanity of having this individual in charge of the world’s largest nuclear arsenal and its primary human, environmental and climate destroyer: the US military.

But Trump is not the only person afflicted with this psychological disorder. Members of both houses of the United States Congress, with only a few exceptions, also routinely display this disorder although, it should be emphasized, it is often combined with other disorders as they terrifiedly submit to the directives of the insane neocon elite driving US foreign policy and its perpetual war against life.

For instance, it has just been graphically highlighted, yet again, by the recent (virtually unanimous) Congressional decision to impose sanctions on Russia, Iran and North Korea for reasons which are readily refuted by the verifiable evidence if you are not too terrified to consider it. See, for example, ‘Intel Vets Challenge “Russia Hack” Evidence’, ‘The Mask Is Off: Trump Is Seeking War with Iran’, ‘Trump Intel Chief: North Korea Learned From Libya War to “Never” Give Up Nukes’ and ‘With the European Union Livid, Congress Pushes Forward on Sanctions Against Russia, Iran and North Korea’.

You will also have no trouble identifying this disorder in Israeli or Saudi Arabian leaders either. Again, however, they are far from alone.

Most importantly though, the ‘magic rat’ is almost invariably evident when adults are challenged to consider their phenomenal violence – ‘visible’, ‘invisible’ and ‘utterly invisible’ – against children, which leads to the terrified and dysfunctional outcomes described above (as well as all of the other terrified and dysfunctional outcomes). See ‘Why Violence?’ and ‘Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice’.

So if you don’t even want to know about this violence, the good news is that your ‘magic rat’, if you have one, will ensure that you never even consider looking at these documents (or don’t get past the first page). The problem, for humanity as a whole, is that if too many people are too terrified to even consider the truth, then we are in deep trouble from which I can see no exit. Because if we are to extricate ourselves from this mess, we must start with the truth, no matter how terrifying.

Is there anything you can do next time you see someone use their ‘magic rat’? Yes. You can reflect that they sound terrified to consider the information in question. If you feel capable of doing this, bear in mind that you might then need to also listen to their terrified response, which might be aggressive as well. For a fuller answer to this question, see ‘Nisteling: The Art of Deep Listening’.

Moreover, if you ever notice your own mind being taken away from information that frightens you, see if you can take your attention back to what you found frightening and feel your fear. The information, in itself, is not going to cause you any harm. It is, after all, simply the truth and you are infinitely more powerful to know the truth and hence be in a position to respond to it, even if it scares you initially.

So if you feel able to respond intelligently and powerfully to reality, which means that you can contemplate information that is terrifying to many, then you might consider participating in the fifteen-year strategy of ‘The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth’ and signing the online pledge of ‘The People’s Charter to Create a Nonviolent World’. And if you want to develop an effective strategy to resist one or the other of the many threats to our survival, consider using the strategic framework explained in Nonviolent Campaign Strategy.

We cannot trap the ‘magic rat’ that afflicts so many individuals but we might be able to assist some of them to recover from this psychological disorder. We might also be able to mobilize those not afflicted (or not so badly afflicted) to respond powerfully to frightening information about the state of our world.

Sadly, however, many people will use their ‘magic rat’ until the day they die. The important point is that we do not let these people, like Donald Trump, decide the fate of humanity.

BUT it is not about Trump, who is just one of everybody who choose political careers and IMO are bought and paid for.... It is about US deciding the fate of ourselves. The magic rat is in our heads.

Delight

19th May 2019, 20:39

At the end of the notice, the list of congresspeople sponsoring is notably all Democrat. IMO we should ALL write all these people with some facts.

Go to the link for the billhere (https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2527/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22vaccinations%22%5D%7D&r=8&s=2&fbclid=IwAR3D25uoZugdY6alPJujpI3A1XnwvV-7kY3wXxsj3bEej0bp_g_giLA_3sc), and sign up for updates, so as soon as anything changes or happens, you know immediately.

H.R.2527 - Vaccinate All Children Act of 2019

Introduced in House (05/03/2019)

116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2527

To amend the Public Health Service Act to condition receipt by States (and political subdivisions and public entities of States) of preventive health services grants on the establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 3, 2019
Ms. Wilson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL
To amend the Public Health Service Act to condition receipt by States (and political subdivisions and public entities of States) of preventive health services grants on the establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Vaccinate All Children Act of 2019”.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING STUDENTS AT PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS TO BE VACCINATED.

(a) Requirement.—Section 317 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247b) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(n) Requiring Students At Public Elementary And Secondary Schools To Be Vaccinated.—

“(1) REQUIREMENT.—For a State or a political subdivision or other public entity of a State to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Secretary’s satisfaction that, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the State requires each student enrolled in one of the State’s public elementary schools or public secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

“(2) EXCEPTION FOR CHILD’S HEALTH.—The funding condition described in paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a student if a duly registered and licensed physician submits a written certification at the beginning of the school year to the individual in charge of the health program at the student’s school—

“(A) certifying that the physician has personally examined the student during the preceding 12 months;

“(B) certifying that, in the physician’s opinion, the physical condition of the student is such that the student’s health would be endangered by the vaccination involved; and

“(C) demonstrating (to the satisfaction of the individual in charge of the health program at the student’s school) that the physician’s opinion conforms to the accepted standard of medical care.

“(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:

“(A) The term ‘Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ means the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices established by the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“(B) The terms ‘elementary school’ and ‘secondary school’ have the meanings given to such terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.”.

(b) Application.—The amendment made by subsection (a) applies only with respect to fiscal years beginning after the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9] 05/10/2019
Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12] 05/10/2019
Rep. Bass, Karen [D-CA-37] 05/10/2019
Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1] 05/10/2019
Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6] 05/10/2019
Rep. Fudge, Marcia L. [D-OH-11] 05/10/2019
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20] 05/10/2019
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30] 05/10/2019
Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2] 05/10/2019
Rep. Lawson, Al, Jr. [D-FL-5] 05/10/2019
Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5] 05/10/2019
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] 05/10/2019
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] 05/10/2019
Rep. Payne, Donald M., Jr. [D-NJ-10] 05/10/2019
Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7] 05/10/2019
Rep. Plaskett, Stacey E. [D-VI-At Large] 05/10/2019
Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7] 05/10/2019

https://www.congress.gov/…/116th-cong…/house-bill/2527/text…

I belong to a facebook group that is discussing "Stop Mandatory Vaccinations". The comments are very suggestive of how paralyzed the response is even when people are concerned.

1. " I'll get a gun and shoot whoever comes at me with needles." Laughable IMO as the way we will be corralled is the inability to participate in society and anyone with a gun will be eliminated.

Personally if faced with a choice to "kill or be killed", I am not sure about the LONG range consequences if we are eternal beings?

Also, the "one " coming at you with the needle is not the issue.

Even if 1000's took out weapons, we have seen what happens when the authorities are manned with tanks and all kinds of other weapons!

2. When shown that Democrats are overwhelmingly the sponsors in states and at the Federal level, people of color fall in to how "bad" the Republicans are for all POC and so they won't support Republicans.

I think people have very short sight. The Democrats were NOT for the 60's sea change in granting people of color full rights in the south! The Democratic Party was a Southern Institution (my grandfather once said he has to "hold his nose and vote democratic") as the Republicans were traditionally the Northern Carpet Bagger's party.

Party platforms come and go. The whole notion that there is any party which will save the day is absurd. The thing I have seen is that when a large enough group make a large enough voice, the politics responds. In Oregon, the bill to make vaccines mandatory was killed when Republicans were concerned enough IMO to use it as a bargaining chip.

3. People who mention "Maybe we should plan a rally in Washington" are countered by "I am sure this group is infiltrated... so and so has no friends or pictures... be careful". Therefore HOW can plans be made when people start feeling afraid and suspicious.

Somehow we have to become in communication and add our numbers together.

4. If anyone makes a slight suggestion they may be for SOME vaccination (but there to stop MANDATES) , they are treated in the same hateful way "Anti-Vax" positions experience from "the OTHER side".

It is rather sad that this is so much the case with people.

Delight

19th May 2019, 22:27

It will be nearly impossible to even find out there WAS a rally on 5/18/19 in Phoenix. I saw a facebook feed but not sure that will link here (https://www.facebook.com/HighWireTalk/videos/664681360657858/UzpfSTMxNTYwMjY1NTk3Njk3MjozNTQ4MzEwNDg3MjA3OTk/?__tn__=kC-R&eid=ARBFfY8HHzqgld8iPUUxSYhxbOR88YUjoRU1l_n0FP8Ev2kqz6Be-00cAmcGUat90nHfiBYJLBfIz1SS&hc_ref=ARR3un-lQw5YLVe8o0RkZl1Y_Co48Jt2-0k262LL8h81qk253a2utINaN_40iohEN4g&__xts__[0]=68.ARBom41Tpr8-lLuu0zON3e9_NB6kUHh6sqdmUXQSP9c_X069H1PGfOIHDeAGG8zSzZ0DhBknThrHSODUod6avyOKMkOHh4Ijzx4wNIuvF5PCUNeZ AoNIQKIBW4r0wjgJKb0A96cmx0wzsZ60x8t57-0tUK0EFKebetvD8yyfmBw3lX1leSphVtbS-5ZE6hVWpJsUPJYA0beKSd9F-Y_b08zofyG5PfdPOCkrGvlcl1GvV8yUmQsxlNwgVc_NOHNVEkb99lZwWwVAuwppl7hD3NbzSaLkPh_8gk4Lg55RR6VjjRCZUia6N n8Y68h-nO_jC_oUMRO9n_2Lg09k09gLUzbqeL_0kYSWougImxoQXvbtSMx06MHi6cJIeeYarQ-acFBtL9BvsGkWAVKGFzL2ercDRDBMmV3-ZvZxK5wSKWCzE5WUB0DtB5Rh3--LOdXljxwYdyJYLf50Ky1xGXbVHoNII6AAKUWowUV_o0drhRdYSbg7zmsfKjX5yOYOwAc)?

Former Big Pharma insider, Brandy Vaughn, who was once a sales representative for Merck, discusses vaccines at a Health Choice rally in Arizona.

Op7Dy-K0MR4

Preserve religious freedom in vaccinations | Opinion
By ANDREA DEMICHAEL
| SPECIAL TO THE SUN SENTINEL |
MAY 13, 2019 (https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-vaccine-freedom-group-20190513-z6odclark5flnlpmjc6pjacu3i-story.html?fbclid=IwAR3pcdjiM12uM0Xh6coWY4cbK0plTb6Un_j8OzglCXLxuHuCBR4ntNEkmPE)
Preserve religious freedom in vaccinations
If someone wants to vaccinate so be it, but the government should not mandate a medical treatment, period, writes Andrea DeMichael, a co-founder of the Florida Freedom Alliance. Her organization argues that, instead of working toward mandating a vaccine, which clearly has efficacy questions, we should look at repealing the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which protects vaccine companies, not Floridians.

The Florida Freedom Alliance would like to clarify some facts and implied points raised in an April 16 Sun Sentinel column that called for ending Florida’s vaccine exemptions.

The problem with the national conversation is that people seemingly must be either for or against with no reasonable middle ground. The government and pharmaceutical industry will not accept that people have concerns about efficacy and safety, and want it proven.

If vaccines are so safe, then why has $4 billion been paid out to vaccine-injured families by the government’s “special court”? And the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that less than 1 percent of adverse reactions to vaccines are even reported.

The government and the press are not disclosing certain facts. In measles cases, it seems very informative to disclose whether “outbreaks” are coming from vaccine-induced strains or wild virus strains. This is a huge fact to conceal and is incredibly disingenuous.

For example, 38 percent of the cases during the 2015 Disneyland measles outbreak were caused by the MMR vaccine itself, according to the Journal of Clinical Microbiology. This is really about honesty from our government and our press.

If someone wants to vaccinate so be it, but the government should not mandate a medical treatment, period. And we need a press corps willing to find out all facets of the truth and report it verbatim without casting judgment.

Let’s put some numbers to this debate. Many news sources have repeatedly stated that this virus was eradicated and has come “roaring back.” There are 695 people in the U.S. who have had measles and who will have lifelong immunity once they recover. Let us reiterate that these are people who have had measles, not deaths from the measles.

Florida supposedly has only two measles cases out of a population of 21.3 million people. There are only two cases in the state of Florida. Furthermore, if the vaccines are 93-97 percent effective, then who is tracking down the 3-7 percent of people who received the vaccines but for whom it did not work? Let’s put a number to that. That would be at least 639,000 people and up to 1.5 million people in the State of Florida, whose vaccines didn’t work.

Why are you lambasting the 25,000 people for exercising religious freedoms when you have a much bigger threat on your hands from the inefficiency of the vaccine itself?

According to Pew Research, 76 percent of Floridians are religious, which is more than 16 million people. As a proportion, 25,000 seems very low. More importantly, freedom of religion is an integral part of our governance. Therefore, there can be no questioning of sincere religious belief on the part of the government. Such an attempt would violate the First Amendment and break our governance structure, which has seemingly worked quite well for a few hundred years.

There are valid reasons for the loss of public faith in the vaccine product. For example, you will find out that no vaccine manufacturer is held liable for its products, due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. This has turned vaccine products into a cash cow for the manufacturers with very little liability. This has also allowed for very large marketing budgets aimed at doctors, media outlets and elected officials. If these manufacturers actually were held liable for their products, there would have to be more public trust.

Now a point about herd immunity. It was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher named A.W. Hedrich, who had been studying U.S. measles patterns from 1900–1931, before any measles vaccine was ever invented. He observed that epidemics of the illness only occurred when less than 68 percent of children had developed a natural immunity to it. So, the herd immunity theory was about natural disease processes. Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase and increased the figure from 68 percent to 95 percent with little to no scientific justification. Essentially, they took Hedrich’s study and manipulated it to promote vaccine products. Sound familiar?

Contracting the natural measles virus provides lifelong immunity, whereas the vaccine immunity, when it works, wanes. So, the CDC is already recommending second and third booster shots for some people. Are you seeing a pattern here?

So, instead of working toward mandating a vaccine, which clearly has efficacy questions, we should look at repealing the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which protects vaccine companies, not Floridians.

Several legislative offices have informed our organization that they have received more phone calls and emails in opposition to the immunization tracking bills than any other bill making its way through our state government.

The people are making their sentiments known. The question is, “who is listening and who is getting paid by the vaccine manufacturers?”

Andrea DeMichael is an attorney and a co-founder of the Florida Freedom Alliance. The organization was founded to protect the fundamental rights we have as American citizens and human beings. The goal is to unite similar organizations fighting for individual freedoms.

Delight

20th May 2019, 02:00

This information is THREE years old!

Anthony Samsel on Vaccines contaminated with Glyphosate
Published on Aug 31, 2016
Scientists Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff have just gotten the fifth peer reviewed paper on Glyphosate published. Its named "Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases V: Amino acid analogue of glycine in diverse proteins".

In this regard Tony Mitra interviewed Anthony Samsel, to cover the newly emerging scientific findings on Glyphosate and how it can and does hurt creatures including humans.

In the course of the interview, Anthony Samsel mentioned the issues being covered in their next paper, the 6th one. This covers a number of vaccines that use animal byproducts such as egg protein and gelatine. He suspected these products might be contaminated with Glyphosate, if the vaccine makers were using factory farmed animals fed with Glyphosate laced GMO feed.

To verify, he got a large number of vaccines that do use egg proteins and gelatine and got them analyzed in multiple labs. The results confirmed his doubt. The vaccines themselves are largely contaminated with Glyphosate and pose serious hazard to those that are and will be vaccinated using these products.

The pathologies to which glyphosate could plausibly contribute, through its known biosemiotic effects, include inflammatory bowel disease, Entropy 2013

k33iFXHlOnY

Bubu

20th May 2019, 10:48

Delight

20th May 2019, 16:23

Thanks for posting all the videos I was able to use it to preach somewhere where it is much needed. Of course the trolls gang up on me until the mods was force to lock the thread saying " this thread is causing moderation headache of epic proportion" hahaha. I did make some head ached. But I can tell that many people agree with me but for some reason decided to keep quite until one or two started expressing their anti vax view. Then that's it the end of the rope.

https://permies.com/t/111237/baby-brain-development-trauma-vaccines

I took a look at the forum.

My honest opinion is that vaccination IF it leads to immunity without adding additional harm is a great idea!! I'd love to see more and more and more research about the immune system. I'd love to see an open book of science that is growing in wisdom and the opportunity to NURSE us all into the best place for nature to act ON. I am a Nightingale. This is my coined word for an eclectic cross fertilization of interest in all that is true about us and our health.

I noticed a story about the famous author Roald Dahl's daughter Olivia dying of measles encephalitis (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/roald-dahls-open-letter-about-his-daughter-dying-from-measles-becomes-touchpoint-for-current-us-10019824.html). This story is an example of why people say "we MUST vaccinate. That a child might catch measles and THEN have disastrous sequelae is the reason given we CANNOT allow individual refusals. There is no weight given to the fact that individual persons and their TERRAIN determine the susceptibility and outcomes. Then there is the unbalanced access to excellent acute care for crisis (some hospitals, doctors and nurses are FRANKLY better than others!).

We are lumped into a homogenous collective of same body, same circumstance. Vaccination is about the community and not the individual. So instead of some deaths from the measles, we can accept whatever sequelae from the vaccine. It has to do with a belief that every one is the same.
What also really seems obvious are some underlying assumptions that are fantastic.

1. The public health department is competent of managing health. I know I once trusted the health department.
2. The government is capable of making unbiased decisions. I know I once counted on the leadership.
3. the vaccine industry is reliable and ethical. I was disillusioned strongly about this body.
4. The medical establishment generally has brilliant doctors and the highest caliber teams and care is available equally. As an RN I learned early on this is NOT the case.

SO we MUST defer to these authorities at our peril. This means we cannot give them power. That means we have to take charge and learn and be able to care for ourselves. That means if we don't overcome our divisions, we will all become victims sooner or later.

This whole tangled ball of various aspects is important to unravel. I am very invested in CHOICE because that is where we can all have our victory. INFORMED CONSENT and rights to say YES and NO is mandatory, not the vaccination.

Yes, some people will be ill from measles and others sources. IMO we need to keep amping up the ability to support people through crisis. I once worked as an RN at an excellent IMO teaching hospital. I also worked at some other hospitals that were NOT good and the care was frightening. I saw some MDs who were brilliant and others who were moronic. I met nurses who terrified me.

Other than having rather artificial standards of care, one is not able to know in advance if when ill, you will have the best care. EVERY ONE who ever enters a hospital has some story about TERRIBLE experience with the so called Care. That is one reason no one should enter alone.

The standards of care in the cook book are INSTEAD of excellence, not indicators.

WE ARE ALL UNIQUE and what is good for some is not going to work for everyone YET, we all need the same kind of careful attention and TLC.

Jon Rappoport talks about collectivism here 1:23:00 (from 5/19/19)

dTqfrOhF0P8

Bubu

20th May 2019, 17:23

Delight

20th May 2019, 17:36

My honest opinion is that vaccination IF it leads to immunity without adding additional harm is a great idea!! ]

I grew up having colds often just like any normal kids. We were vaccinated as a child and so I grew up wondering why our dogs and other animals dont get sick. All of our dogs died of old age and we never took them to the vet. they also never had vaccines. Now however on the introduction of anti rabbies and other dog vaccine dogs are often sick just like humans. And the more they visit the vets the more they get sick. No different than humans

My opinion is that we have a natural immunity that is destroyed by vaccines. I know that vaccines also damage the dogs immune system just as in humans. So to me. "don't fix something that's not broken"

I think of the situation as nuanced. In an earlier post I placed Bruce Lipton's opinion. He talked about how from birth people put everything in the mouth and encounter the environment. It introduces everything to the immune system but it is local. People who live local have an immune system that is 100% attuned. But GLOBAL is different. The story I always recall is the decimation of the native population in the Americas when the Europeans brought totally new diseases. My question is WHY didn't the European visitors all die?

But anyway if we could ameliorate the severity of "foreign" organisms challenges to the body in a way and enhance the immunity with selected challenges that don't overwhelm, that is what I mean as a good idea?

onawah

20th May 2019, 20:32

Fetal DNA Contaminants Found in Merck’s MMR Vaccines
5/20/19
http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/fetal-dna-contaminants-found-in-mercks-measles-vaccines/

"OPEN LETTER TO LEGISLATORS REGARDING FETAL CELL DNA IN VACCINES
By Theresa A. Deisher, Ph.D.
Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute

My name is Dr. Theresa Deisher. I am Founder and Lead Scientist at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, whose mission is to educate the public about vaccine safety, as well as to pressure manufacturers to provide better and safer vaccines for the public.

I obtained my doctorate from Stanford University in Molecular and Cellular Physiology in 1990 and completed my post-doctoral work at the University of Washington. My career has been spent in the commercial biotechnology industry, and I have done work from basic biological and drug discovery through clinical development.

I am writing regarding unrefuted scientific facts about fetal DNA contaminants in the Measles-Mumps- Rubella vaccine, which must be made known to lawmakers and the public.

Merck’s MMR II vaccine (as well as the chickenpox, Pentacel, and all Hep-A containing vaccines) is manufactured using human fetal cell lines and is heavily contaminated with human fetal DNA from the production process.

Levels in our children can reach up to 5 ng/ml after vaccination, depending on the age, weight and blood volume of the child. That level is known to activate Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which can cause autoimmune attacks.

To illustrate the autoimmune capability of very small amounts of fetal DNA, consider this: labor is triggered by fetal DNA from the baby that builds up in the mother’s bloodstream, triggering a massive immune rejection of the baby. This is labor.

It works like this: fetal DNA fragments [i] from a baby with about 300 base pairs in length are found in a pregnant mother’s serum. When they reach between 0.46– 5.08 ng/mL in serum, they trigger labor via the TLR9 mechanism [ii]. The corresponding blood levels are 0.22 ng/ml and 3.12 ng/ml.

The fetal DNA levels in a child after being injected with fetal-manufactured vaccines reach the same level that triggers autoimmune rejection of baby by mother.

Anyone who says that the fetal DNA contaminating our vaccines is harmless either does not know anything about immunity and Toll- like receptors or they are not telling the truth.

If fetal DNA can trigger labor (a naturally desired autoimmune reaction), then those same levels in vaccines can trigger autoimmunity in a child.

Fragmented fetal DNA contained in vaccines is of similar size, ~215 base pairs. [iii]

This is direct biological evidence that fetal DNA contaminants in vaccines are not in low innocuous amounts. They are a very strong proinflammatory trigger.

Administration of fragments of human fetal (primitive) non-self DNA to a child could generate an immune response that would also cross-react with the child’s own DNA, since the contaminating DNA could have sections of overlap very similar to the child’s own DNA.

Children with autistic disorder have antibodies against human DNA in their circulation that non- autistic children do not have. These antibodies may be involved in autoimmune attacks in autistic children. [iv]

Duke University demonstrated in a recently conducted study that significant improvements in behavior were observed when children with autism spectrum disorder were treated with their own banked autologous cord blood [v].

This treatment clearly shows that most children with autism are not born with it since genetic diseases like Down syndrome or muscular fibrosis cannot be treated with autologous stem cells.

Therefore, an environmental trigger, or triggers, introduced to the world around 1980 when autism first began to rise, must be identified and eliminated or reduced in the environment.

Strong change-point correlation exists between rising autism rates and the US vaccine manufacturing switch from animal-derived cell lines for rubella vaccine to human aborted cell lines in the late 70s [vi].
The earliest change point for Autistic Disorder (AD) birth year was identified for 1981 for California and U.S. data, preceded by a switch in the manufacturing process:
In January 1979, the FDA approved the manufacturing switch for the rubella virus from animal based (high passage virus, HPV-77, grown e.g. in duck embryo cells) to the human fetal cell line WI-38 using the RA27/3 virus strain [vii]. Both the newly approved monovalent rubella vaccine and a trivalent mumps, measles and rubella vaccine utilize the WI-38 fetal cell line for manufacturing of the rubella vaccine portion.
Prior to 1980, autism spectrum disorder was a very rare, almost unknown disease. According to the figures of the CDC, the rate of autism in 2014 was 1 in 59 children , a very steep increase since just 2000, when it was 1 in 150. CDC: “The total costs per year for children with ASD in the United States were estimated to be between $11.5 billion – $60.9 billion (2011 US dollars) [viii].”
Recently, duplications and de novo deletions have been recognized in up to 10% of simplex autism spectrum disorders, corroborating environmental triggers on the genetics of autism spectrum disorders [ix].
The rubella portion of the MMR vaccine contains human derived fetal DNA contaminants of about 175 ngs, more than 10x over the recommended WHO threshold of 10 ng per vaccine dose [x].
No other drug on the market would receive FDA approval without thorough toxicity profiling (FDA follows international ICH guidelines) -> this was never conducted by the pharmaceutical industry for the DNA contamination in the MMR vaccine.
Vaccines produced with human fetal cell lines contain cell debris and contaminating residual human DNA, which cannot be fully eliminated during the downstream purification process of the virus [xi]. Moreover, DNA is not only characterized by its sequence (ATCG), but also by its epigenetic modification (e.g. DNA methylation pattern etc.). This decoration is highly species specific, which is why non-human DNA will be eliminated, while this is not necessarily the case with fetal human DNA.
Injecting our children with human fetal DNA contaminants bears the risk of causing two well- established pathologies:

1) Insertional mutagenesis: fetal human DNA incorporates into the child’s DNA causing mutations. Gene therapy using small fragment homologous recombination has demonstrated that as low as 1.9 ng/ml of DNA fragments results in insertion into the genome of stem cells in 100% of mice injected [xii]. The levels of human fetal DNA fragments in our children after vaccination with MMR, Varivax (chickenpox) or Hepatitis A containing vaccines reach levels beyond 1.9 ng/ml.

2) Autoimmune disease: fetal human DNA triggers a child’s immune system to attack his/her own body.

An additional concern: retrovirus contamination.

Human endogenous retrovirus K (HERVK) is a contaminant in the measles/mumps/rubella vaccine [xiii].

HERVK can be reactivated in humans [xiv]. It codes for a protein (integrase) specialized in integrating DNA into the human genome.
Several autoimmune diseases have been associated with HERVK activity [xv].
It is also in the same family of retroviruses as the MMLV virus used in a gene therapy trial, in which inappropriate gene insertion (insertional mutagenesis) led to subsequent additional somatic mutations and cancer in 4 of 9 young boys [xvi].
It is therefore possible that the HERVK gene fragment present in the MMR vaccine is active, codes for the integrase or the envelope protein, and thus has the potential to induce gene insertion, fostering insertional mutagenesis and autoimmunity.
The presence of both the high level contaminating fetal DNA as well as the HERVK contamination in the MMR vaccine is an unstudied risk with huge implications and dangers for individual and public health.

Solution: Pressure manufacturers to switch back to animal cell line derived rubella vaccines as was successfully done in Japan:

Based on Takahashi strains of live attenuated rubella virus, produced on rabbit kidney cells. A single dose of this vaccine has been recently proven to retain immunity for at least 10 years when rubella was under regional control [xvii].
Split MMR vaccine into three individually offered options as done in Japan.
The MMR vaccine manufacturing process needs to be changed to address and eliminate the above risks for the public.

Thank you for your consideration. I will be happy to address any questions you may have concerning the above."

Sincerely,

Theresa A. Deisher, Ph.D.

Read the full letter at InformedChoiceWA.org : https://www.informedchoicewa.org/education/open-letter-fetal-dna-in-vaccines/
[i] Lo et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Apr;62(4):768-75

[ii] Enninga et al. Front Immunol. 2015 Aug 26;6:424

[iii] Deisher et al. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70

[iv] Mostafa et al. 2014, J Neuroimmunol , Vol. 272, pp. 94–98; Mostafa et al. 2015, J Neuroimmunol , Vol. 280, pp. 16–20

[v] Dawson et al. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017 May;6(5):1332-1339

[vi] Deisher et al. Issues Law Med, 2015 Vol. 30, pp. 25-46

[vii] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html; Plotkin, SA. 2006, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 43, pp. S164–168;

[viii] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

[ix] Sebat et al. 2007, Science., Vol. 316, pp. 445-449; Sanders et al. 2011, Neuron, Vol. 70, pp. 863-885

[x] Series, WHO Technical Report. WHO EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION 941; Deisher et al. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70

[xi] Kramberger et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(4):1010-21.

[xii] McNeer, N A et al. “Systemic delivery of triplex-forming PNA and donor DNA by nanoparticles mediates site-specific genome editing of human hematopoietic cells in vivo.” Gene therapy vol. 20,6 (2012): 658-69. doi:10.1038/gt.2012.82

[xiii] Victoria et al. J Virol. 2010, Vol. 84, pp. 6033-6040

[xiv] Lee et al. PLoS Pathog. 2007 3(1):e10; Dewannieux et al. Biologicals, Vol. 38, pp. 366-70

[xv] Taietal.9,Nov2008, Mult Scler, Vol. 14, pp. 1175-80; Dickerson et al. 2008, Schizophr Res. 2008 Sep;104(1-3):121-6, Vol. 104, pp. 121-6

[xvi] Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. J Clin Invest. 2008 Sep;118(9):3132-42

[xvii] Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016 May 20;69(3):221-3

Delight

21st May 2019, 01:53

Synergy between glyphosate and vaccines!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Synergistic Destruction: How Vaccines and GMOs Converge to Fuel Autism and Neurodegenerative Conditions
By: Dr. Matthew Buckley, PSc.D.

There is a lot of debate as to what is the cause, or better yet, causes of autism. This post isn’t intended to cover all of the variables which fuel autism. It is intended to provide the reader with an understanding of chief mechanisms related to how consumption of Monsanto’s RoundUp, by way of consuming genetically modified corn, soy, canola oil, sugar beets, or any other “RoundUp ready” crop, as well as vaccines may fuel microglial activation, a leading factor in all neurodegenerative conditions, including autism (1)(2)(3), Alzheimer’s(4)(5), ALS(6)(7), Parkinson’s(8)(9), non-situational depression(10)(11), and virtually all forms of chronic illness. While this post is more directed towards the discussion of autism, the reality is that all of the factors that I discuss below are unquestionably major factors of consideration in all neurodegenerative conditions.

What is microglial activation?
In short, the microglia are the resident immune cells within the central nervous system. They are known to exist in two different states, and while in the “surveillance mode”, they play a key role in both cleaning up debris such as dead neurons (brain cells), in addition to fighting off infection within the nervous system. That “surveillance mode” role of the microglia, can be shifted into an inflammatory and destructive state where they secrete toxic substances (glutamate) and break down the neurons. That destructive state is referred to as “microglial activation”. Research indicates that the body’s ability to maintain adequate amounts of antioxidants, in particular glutathione and superoxide dismutase, play key roles in determining the threshold by which the microglia may be shifted into the destructive activation state.(12)

To reiterate a previous post, the role that Monsanto plays in microglial activation is related to the fact that their genetically modified crops (corn, soy, canola, sugar beets) along with conventionally raised wheat, that is being doused with RoundUp as a drying agent, is accumulating the chemical residue within the crops that people and most conventionally raised farm animals are consuming.(13) Research carried out by “Moms Across America” has been documenting evidence of RoundUp bio-accumulation in the American population, while the USDA and FDA have claimed that they lack the funding to test for it in food.(14) The argument in favor of the use of RoundUp has centered around the idea that humans lack any enzymes which can be adversely affected by glyphosate, which is the chief ingredient in RoundUp. Research suggests otherwise.(15)(16)(17) What is beyond dispute however, is the fact that RoundUp residue does affect the microbes living in and on our bodies, and not in a good way. Research demonstrates that glyphosate, a patented antibiotic, which is the active ingredient in RoundUp, alters the microbial ecology to become dominant in pathogenic strains of bacteria, including the highly toxic Clostridium Botulinum.(18)(19)(20) Would you be surprised to learn that farmers and farm animals are experiencing an increased rate of Clostridium Botulinum infections? You shouldn’t be.(21)(22) Likewise, studies of autistic populations have demonstrated altered intestinal flora, with an increase in toxic Clostridia species.(23)(24)(25)

What triggers microglial activation?
Modulation of adult-born neurons in the inflamed hippocampusThe significance of the shift of the microbial ecology to become dominant in pathogenic strains of bacteria, particularly as it relates to autism and other neurodegenerative conditions is that pathogenic bacteria promotes an increase of two chemicals which are known to fuel microglial activation, “lipopolysaccharide” (LPS), and Interleukin 1B (IL-1b). The LPS is a cell wall fragment of some of the pathogenic bacteria, and the IL-1b is one member of a class of immune system messenger molecules, referred to as “cytokines”, generated in response to bacterial infections. (26) Cytokines are recognized to be prime factors in relation to how poorly we feel when we get sick. As the pathogenic bacteria grow in numbers, as they would with continued glyphosate consumption (not to mention sugar and/or refined carbohydrate consumption), they can degrade the lining of the intestines, a process called “leaky gut”, which then allows for the LPS to enter into the blood stream.(27) The immune system responds by producing IL-1b. In fact, LPS or IL-1b have become standard agents in studying microglial activation, so this idea that the pathogenic bacteria may fuel microglial activation by way of LPS and/or IL-1b is well established.(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) Additionally, it’s been demonstrated that the LPS or cytokines produced in the periphery of the body, promote signals up to the brain by way of the vagus nerve, causing the brain to produce these destructive cytokines within the nervous system. Both LPS and IL-1b have also been demonstrated to degrade the blood brain barrier (BBB), which serves as an important protective fence from infections and/or other toxins which may have entered into the body. In a state of leaky gut, where the microbes from the intestines can migrate into the blood stream, invasions from these microbes, both “good” and bad may find their way into the nervous system and continually promote ongoing microglial activation once the BBB has been compromised.

Does the autistic population show evidence of LPS or IL-1b?
Yes, studies involving autistic populations evaluating levels of cytokines, such as IL-1b, have demonstrated very clearly that the autistic population, in particular the subset with gastrointestinal complaints, have shown consistently high levels of IL-1b.(33)(34)

J Neuroinflammation. 2013; 10: 38.
IL-1β appears to be the cytokine most involved in the quantitative traits and clinical subgroups of ASD (Figure 4). Involvement of IL-1β in the physiopathology of autism is generally supported by several studies reporting higher levels of this cytokine in the plasma of children with ASD, high-functioning children with ASD, and adults with severe ASD compared with unrelated controls [48]. It has been shown that peripheral blood cells from subjects with ASD produced higher levels of IL-1β both at baseline and after stimulation with Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 or TLR4 [48]

Setting the stage for autism and an adverse event to a vaccine, has a lot to do with diet, including moms diet.
Consider everything I’ve said above, and think for a moment of how many mothers are eating the SAD diet, laden with gut ecology disrupting RoundUp residue. Does mom like to eat GMO flakes for breakfast? Perhaps she opts for a RoundUp laden whole wheat bagel, or maybe she prefers the roundup laden tortillas for her egg tacos in the morning? Either way, for the average mom, odds are high that she’s consuming RoundUp residue with regularity. A rather common denominator to autism are mothers that have hypothyroidism(35)(36), and the prime cause of hypothyroidism is autoimmunity(37), which has leaky gut as its prime cause.(38)(39)(40) What this suggests is that mom is in a pro-inflammatory state to begin with, her gut ecology is less than ideal, and the significance of that is that those microbes that she has living in and on her body are what are shared with her offspring, assuming she gives birth vaginally. If the baby is delivered vaginally, the baby will have the disrupted gut ecology of the mother, and have all of the basic ingredients in place for microglial activation to already be set in motion. If the baby is born via C-Section, the gut ecology isn’t likely to be better, and may be worse.(41)(42) What I suspect is happening is a sort of smoldering state of low level microglial activation in both the mom and her offspring. To make matters worse, millions of moms are feeding their babies the frankenfood cocktail called “infant formula”, which is commonly GMO’d soy and high fructose corn syrup based, all of which feed the wrong microbes at a critical time of brain and immune system development.(43)(44)

As I’ve pointed out, autoimmunity has a common denominator in leaky gut, and autoimmune disorders are increasing at an unprecedented rate right now. Given the fact that at least 1/5th of the US population is suffering from an autoimmune condition, and many mothers don’t know they have such a condition, the stage has been set for an adverse event to a vaccine.

Vaccines, gas to the smoldering fire of LPS and IL-1b driven microglial activation.
brain fireAs I’ve pointed out, LPS and IL-1b are considered standard agents for inducing microglial activation in a lab setting, and both LPS and IL-1b are driven largely by bacterial infections. Another standard agent to consistently induce microglial activation is the cytokine Interferon Gamma (IFN-y).(44)(45)(46)

A number of vaccines are live virus vaccines, and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine is one such vaccine. Viral infections are known triggers for the production of IFN-y.(47)(48)(49) Can you see where this is going? The principle cytokine driven by the MMR vaccine has been identified as IFN-y. (50) If any of these live viruses from the vaccines managed to withstand an inadequate immune response, and instead became a chronic infection, which does happen(51), and therefore become a chronic inducer of IFN-y, you have a perfect recipe for significant ongoing brain inflammation, particularly in the GMO induced gut flora altered individual given the fact that IFN-y is also a known promoter of leaky gut.(52)continued here (http://kinseimindbody.com/synergistic-destruction-how-vaccines-and-gmos-converge-to-fuel-autism-and-neurodegenerative-conditions/)

3a3ykJkqMUk

_CVS-9CgFQs

petra

21st May 2019, 15:00

My honest opinion is that vaccination IF it leads to immunity without adding additional harm is a great idea!! ]

I grew up having colds often just like any normal kids. We were vaccinated as a child and so I grew up wondering why our dogs and other animals dont get sick. All of our dogs died of old age and we never took them to the vet. they also never had vaccines. Now however on the introduction of anti rabbies and other dog vaccine dogs are often sick just like humans. And the more they visit the vets the more they get sick. No different than humans

My opinion is that we have a natural immunity that is destroyed by vaccines. I know that vaccines also damage the dogs immune system just as in humans. So to me. "don't fix something that's not broken"

This reminded me of an article I read a while back about there being a link between having dogs around, and better immunity.

Study: Dogs Decrease Kids' Risk of Asthma
Ref: https://www.parents.com/health/parents-news-now/study-dogs-decrease-kids-risk-of-asthma/

I grew up wondering why everyone got sick more than I did, and the only thing I was doing differently was taking Vitamin C every day. I think it could have made a big difference. I never had any dogs growing up, but my bedroom didn't get cleaned, so that might have helped too :)

ThePythonicCow

22nd May 2019, 18:33

The Mozilla Team, producers of the Firefox browser, step into the vaccine controversy.

Their position is straight forward: The anti-vaccination movement is spreading misinformation.

Here's the contents of the email they just sent to me, and I presume to anyone else on their email list.

================

What Can You Do About Misinformation?

Let's dig deeper into the issue.

Hey There,

People around the world are very concerned about misinformation. That, we know.

Yet how does misinformation spread? Who is spreading it? Why is it so hard to stop? What can we all do about it?

For these questions, the anti-vaccination movement is an interesting place to dig in. We can see how misinformation works, and gain some insight into what we can do.

The World Health Organization (WHO) named (https://click.e.mozilla.org/?qs=39b1a79f9acb507ff7dd8cd7b1d951ee2a4a3e1cd570fafea78645098bc31ccff173b8b04c46c84eefad858a589e4e19 41ea6ff588281580) vaccine hesitancy one of its top 10 health threats of 2019. The past year has seen a rise in measles outbreaks worldwide. From the United States to Madagascar to Costa Rica — there has been a 30% rise in measles cases globally, according to the WHO.

How does the misinformation spread by the anti-vaccination movement cause a resurgence in a disease that was nearly eliminated from many of the countries around the world?

According to Renée DiResta, Wired writer and Mozilla Fellow on Misinformation, there are four main factors contributing to the spread of anti-vaccine misinformation online.

One, people around the world have all gathered together on a handful of social media platforms, making them easier to reach and easier to target with messages.
Two, algorithms on social media platforms prioritize engaging content — accurate or not — over factual information.
Three, it has become cheap and easy to automate the targeting of people on social media who are susceptible to these messages to help them spread — like new parents who just want to know what's best for their kids.
Finally, although small in number, anti-vaccination groups are good at being loud on social media. They unfortunately rely on online harassment techniques to bully voices trying to share factual information. (We're actually a little nervous we'll get attacked simply for sending this email.)

We've put together a reading list (https://click.e.mozilla.org/?qs=39b1a79f9acb507f326c9345e11ecc638d63f832d4a24b0a4e1387de9c440b9fbeaf0358f4ac02125ee2c5662515fa30 ef6f2557c4daeab5) to help you dig into the issue and the tactics the anti-vaccination movement uses to spread dangerous — perhaps even deadly — misinformation. Respondents in our recent global misinformation survey (https://click.e.mozilla.org/?qs=39b1a79f9acb507f7d77e1c1a91950ca1c9b1df7d6b240d9f874c3b61665703fd937757353efab40f909937fc747570f 40f6c7ef864d24b4) cited education to help spot misinformation as the number one tool they wanted to help fight this problem. So, this reading list is a great place to start.

You'll notice a couple of articles in that reading list citing our Mozilla Fellow, Renée DiResta. Renée has offered to answer your questions on this topic. Submit your question (https://click.e.mozilla.org/?qs=39b1a79f9acb507fa38dac052f12e0a14e18e305f684d384e6fe924053926346a2dfb7fd7180654cb8a752facca104c4 01bafe51f24cac5c) and we will follow up with her answers to your direct questions over the next couple of weeks.

The worldwide growth of the anti-vaccine movement, fueled by misinformation spread on places like Facebook and YouTube, is just one drop in the vast sea of problems misinformation causes in our world today. Other bad actors are using the same tactics on issues from climate change to political unrest.

We all have a responsibility to fight this problem. Here at Mozilla, we're proudly committed to using our resources, expertise and global reach to fight this serious issue. It's part of our commitment to an internet that elevates critical thinking, reasoned argument, and verifiable facts.

Thank you,

– The Mozilla Team
================

ThePythonicCow

22nd May 2019, 18:55

Dennis Leahy

22nd May 2019, 20:37

Delight

22nd May 2019, 20:38

I submitted the following "question" to Mozilla Fellow, Renée DiResta, at the Submit your question (https://click.e.mozilla.org/?qs=39b1a79f9acb507fa38dac052f12e0a14e18e305f684d384e6fe924053926346a2dfb7fd7180654cb8a752facca104c4 01bafe51f24cac5c) link in my previous post just above:

================

Rather than taking positions on issues unrelated to Mozilla's core expertise and business and instead assuming the responsibility to "fight this problem", of dissenting positions (that which you label "misinformation"), why do you not continue to take as your primary responsibility providing to all a reliable, performant, secure, feature rich web browser? Whenever the most powerful can limit the free flow of information that they don't like, by persuading the producers of critical infrastructure (such as Firefox) that that information is "disinformation" needing to be limited, then we, humanity, suffer a serious loss. What if you're deeply wrong on the matter of vaccines? How many more of our children would be harmed or killed, due to a further lack of the freedom and means to share conflicting evidence and dissenting views?
================

I am so INFURIATED that we are being corralled into a world where we are not allowed to hear what the authorities do not want us to know. What really makes me cry is that people I interact with daily think that they KNOW what is best... people who think vaccines cause injury and refuse them are dangerous and should be silenced.

There is NO EXCUSE to silence us IMO. But the excuses USED like the measles epidemic INSULT every one. They assume us to be so emotionally immature that we will freak out and never look at the facts.

YES, people will die from disease unless we find the way to adequately provide the "rescue" care. The rescue care started way before the illness with the environment.

Also, there is inequality in the after care... depending on where and which treatments.

There are SO MANY reasons anyone might die form a communicable disease. they need to be addressed.

That does not excuse FORCING us to accept vaccination. Every one who is outraged over this violation is on the right side of history. Every one who would force a human fellow to endure this violation is NOT on the right side.

About the people who believe the propaganda and think ANY perceived "end justifies the means", what do I think? IMO they are deserving of every bit of what will becoming.

_Asw8CTpHo8

onawah

22nd May 2019, 21:34

As I understand it, and I think I got this from the work of Dr. Rebecca Carley (whose career has been pretty much destroyed, like many others, because of their research showing the dangers of vaccines)...originally the theory that vaccines was based on came from homeopathy.

Someone got the bright idea that since homeopathy is based on building immunity by introducing an element of the unwanted organism into the body, giving the body a chance to build up an immunity to it, something similar could be done through injections.

However, homeopathy never injects anything directly into the body, bypassing the immune system, and no organisms were ever introduced to the body in that way at all through homeopathy.

It's more like the vibrational frequencies of that organism to be resisted are introduced, so diluted that nothing actually remains of the organism at all, and so nothing that could actually cause harm, unlike vaccines.

So as far as I've been able to determine, the whole "science" behind vaccines was thought up by madmen, implemented by madmen, and backed by businessmen with no moral compass who wanted to make a profit regardless of the harm done, and that continues to this day.

Among the Avalon membership, there must be some medically/clinically savvy members that understand how vaccines actually "work." I'd like to post my understanding of how vaccines "work", but I'm wide open to be educated if my current understanding is scientifically incorrect:

My understanding starts from the concept that a vaccine is used to jump-start the immune system of the vaccine recipient by injecting some dead viral cells of the virus in question, the recipient's body then manufactures antibodies against the new invader, and the body then stores that information (of how to manufacture those antibodies when the real virus infects them.)

It's been a long time since I was in a biology class, but that is what I remember was taught. It sounds brilliant. However, that's not what vaccines actually are, because the dead viral cells do not really do the job in the vaccine manufacturer's brochure. Dead cells do not cause the hoped-for immune response. So, other substances are added to the vaccine that absolutely will cause an immune response. Substances such as mercury and aluminum are used. Thus, the recipient does not really produce antibodies to the virus, and isn't "immune" or protected in any way from their first real encounter with the viral pathogen. It's why we hear news that vaccinated people get a disease they thought they were immune to. Charts clearly show that sanitation is responsible for the immense decline of communicable diseases, and that the point of introduction of any specific vaccine on those charts show no deviation of the trend toward zero cases per thousand.

So, please educate me if that is incorrect.

Flash

22nd May 2019, 21:36

Among the Avalon membership, there must be some medically/clinically savvy members that understand how vaccines actually "work." I'd like to post my understanding of how vaccines "work", but I'm wide open to be educated if my current understanding is scientifically incorrect:

My understanding starts from the concept that a vaccine is used to jump-start the immune system of the vaccine recipient by injecting some dead viral cells of the virus in question, the recipient's body then manufactures antibodies against the new invader, and the body then stores that information (of how to manufacture those antibodies when the real virus infects them.)

It's been a long time since I was in a biology class, but that is what I remember was taught. It sounds brilliant. However, that's not what vaccines actually are, because the dead viral cells do not really do the job in the vaccine manufacturer's brochure. Dead cells do not cause the hoped-for immune response. So, other substances are added to the vaccine that absolutely will cause an immune response. Substances such as mercury and aluminum are used. Thus, the recipient does not really produce antibodies to the virus, and isn't "immune" or protected in any way from their first real encounter with the viral pathogen. It's why we hear news that vaccinated people get a disease they thought they were immune to. Charts clearly show that sanitation is responsible for the immense decline of communicable diseases, and that the point of introduction of any specific vaccine on those charts show no deviation of the trend toward zero cases per thousand.

So, please educate me if that is incorrect.

From what I understand, you are quite correct. Adjuvant such as aluminum in most vaccines, fetal cells, sometimes mercury (but not that much anymore), and hundreds of other stuff may be added to vaccines to trigger a big immune response that would not be trigger by the viral/bacterial content of the vaccine otherwise. Why adjuvants are needed? Because the quantity of virus/bacteria has to be minimal otherwise you would get the real sickness, if the microbe is live. And in most vaccine, that quantity is also from dead viral/bacterial bodies, which surely provokes a lesser response.

But, antibodies to the microbes are found in the blood after the vaccines, so it does have some impact, impact that seems to decrease with time and antibodies that seem to disappear given time.

To my ex son in law, who was doing his master degree in related fields, I did ask the same question. He said that it is extremely expensive to study for new forms of vaccines, that in the meantime the best they have found to trigger the immune response is aluminum and such other stuff we now have in vaccines. Vaccines novelties are being studied through grants (governments mainly and some private) given to universities researchers and to private labs, and when they find a solution, the big pharma buys the patent and sell/distribute the vaccine. The big pharma vaccines labs are usually tiny and are not for research, but rather for inspection of the products and production methods.

However, vaccines are mostly an inefficient cost base venture, not raking in much profit. So, very few big pharma give grants to study it. Furthermore, he was saying that it is governments who push the vaccination of population and forces big pharma to sell vaccines (for a profit of course). That the real money raking of big pharma is cancer, not vaccines.

Which led me to think that the poisoning through vaccination is a world government plan, not an industrial one. To which big pharma participates, having as a return governments doing nothing for the implementation of true treatments for cancer, often already known.

In either case, we are not out of the wood.

All my studies of vaccines led me to think that the poisoning is coming from a multi-source infestation, namely pesticides ( glyphosate), chemtrails (geoengineering), vaccines (adjuvants), and GMO in the form of pesticide resistance in the created modifications of plants, plus EMF somewhat.

This is not totalitarian tiptoe, the tiptoe has passed long ago. This is wide open weakening of the population. (glyphosate would decrease human IQ as well as aluminum plus make one more susceptible to being sick, mostly of.. guess... cancer). But we are already to stupid to realize it.

Delight

22nd May 2019, 22:18

I don't know if anyone watched Bruce Lipton talk about the immune system? It's in a previous post. He talks about the difference between injection and taking in all the antigens by the mouth and nasal cavity. Even taking in antigens form the superficial skin is different. The cowpox story about jenner and a little boy is that he scratched the skin and then applied the serum from a cow pox blister. This was effective because the boy did not become ill but developed a response.

The adjuvants are needed because injecting does not trigger a normal immune response from what I have read. The inflammation and the stress create a response and the adjuvants like aluminum are stored, not excreted. Glyphosate and adjuvants are apparent synergistic as toxins.

I THINK the same people are in government as in Pharma. The master plan is obscure to me. I do know that whatever the plan, only by repudiating the poison and by taking a cure may one be made well.

Flash says it is beyond a tiptoe. I think of it as a slow screwing. The issue now is the degree of the screw's turn. I agree, we are now officially screwed to the wall. Is that what it takes to flip?

Delight

22nd May 2019, 22:40

"In 2025, every second child born will be diagnosed with autism"

This is a very interesting lecture and worth sitting through. One aspect is that every generation since the 19th/ 20th century is experiencing increasing environmental toxicity which epigenetically is altering gene expression. Now we are seeing exponential epigenetically induced damage.

pVr5PywldOA

Delight

23rd May 2019, 01:33

Reading the comments of CA voters who support this "for the greater good" just boggles the mind.....

Facebook post from Dr. Robert Rowan (https://www.facebook.com/DrRobertJRowen/?__tn__=%2CdkCH-R-R&eid=ARBC9rKSLfaQJLu_17NloKMda6t6TdC4Oi6__uCXmZ1GfZb3Lnr_DadFUmldVN_fd4kznuiXLOaQJ43M&hc_ref=ARQ5dCXVhnpnfUYcKProDnrsr_1ksE45Wy6Cbmt9xF4QQ_xfYW7G2ixwmHohQm33mrI&fref=nf&hc_location=group)

Draconian Vaccine Mandate Passes California Senate. Please read to see the effects of this act on you, your doctor, and the practice of medicine. Please read in its entirety, including the comments of Senator Jeff Stone at the end. I’d love your comments.

Despite thousands of protests, hallways jammed with families in opposition, and many doctors opposed, the state senate approved Senator Pan’s dangerous (in my opinion) bill regarding medical exemptions. Pan showed us the extent of his character with this bill. Several years ago, he PROMISED that a medical waiver would be sacred. Now, allegedly for waivers he believes are not appropriate he broke a solemn vow he made to get the bill passed. I am told that his SB 277 co-sponsor, Democratic Senator Allen did not vote for OR against this new measure. He spoke on the floor of the Senate saying he could not support the bill as written as he made personal assurances to get SB 277 passed that the physician waiver was holy, and to support the bill would retract from his previous promises. I have to ask why he did, then, not vote against this new bill. But not voting, he granted tacit approval to break his past promises to the legislature and to the state. But at least he did acknowledge his past promise.

Let’s look at what Senator Pan has just engineered.
1. Destruction of a physician’s license and medical judgment.
2. Replacing my judgment with the judgment of a known corrupt federal agency- the CDC.
3. Imposing the corrupt judgment of the CDC upon a new costly agency this bill creates to oversee exemptions, which agency will be practicing medicine on your child at a distance and in a dark room.
4. Invalidates previous exemptions issued prior to the law, making those exemptions worthless. (see point 7 below).
5. Vaporizes the ancient doctrine of informed consent, a fundamental, and THE MOST IMPORTANT aspect of any medical encounter, and replaces it with a state mandated [criminal] assault (medical act absent informed consent legally constitutes criminal assault).
6. Decriminalizes an assault, when said assault is perpetrated by the state, or in the name of the state.
7. Apparently, knowingly violates both the US and California constitutions by creating an ex post facto law – invalidating RETROACTIVELY an act done PRIOR to the passage of the new law. Even and draconian as the FDA laws might be, Congress always honored the letter of “ex post facto” by exempting articles in commerce prior to passage of FDA laws. Pan and his statist fellow Democrats clearly are willing to violate your fundmental rights (not to be subject to ex post facto) to inject everyone who has not had an overt serious reaction to a vaccine (CDC guidelines).
8. Furthers the monopoly Merck (the Pharma company that killed tens of thousands of Americans with Vioxx) has on vaccines. The MMR is the only measles vaccine licensed in America and Merck holds the patent. We cannot even access individual M, M and R vaccines as available in Japan, and apparently much safer.

I have to ask what our society has degenerated to. California has become worse than a collectivist state. Regarding vaccines, it is now TOTALITARIAN. It actively seeks to destroy the health of your child absent proper testing, allegedly to prevent said illness from striking someone with an immune problem which makes vaccination dangerous. In other words, you can have two siblings with vaccine induced damage, but since you have not suffered damage yet, you will be forced to take the risk in order to create “herd immunity” for a child who has a problem which they say does qualify for exemption. Your two autistic siblings do not qualify. For example, recent research shows that children carrying an afflicted ARHGEF6 gene have a far higher risk of getting autism in their lives than if not. Does Pan’s draconian bill passed by the statist Democrats provide for assessing this published risk? No. If you child carries this gene, would it provide an “acceptable” reason for exemption? No. I will provide information on this research in an upcoming post here, so stay tuned.

I believe that medically, a case of vaccine injury in a 1o relative is a strong reason for a waiver. The CDC does not. But Pan has inserted the CDC in between the patient and the doctor, via a state agency which now has the power to void a doctor’s best judgment, and void it and mandate a medical procedure in the absence of informed consent. We are NOT a Republic anymore. We are in a totalitarian state disguised as a “democracy” which essentially means “mob rule”.

Folks, the article states that Pan has received death threats. Despite the malevolence of what he is doing, we should not meet malevolence with malevolence. I believe that those who believe in protecting fundamental liberties organize to create marches in Washington DC and state capitols. Draw attention to the statist officials who point a gun at you to give to another by force. Defeat them at the polls. Raise the obvious fact that is it the Democratic Party officials who are orchestrating the vaccine totalitarian state. Drive this party from power in elections, or target key Rulers.

There is also “civil disobedience”, a huge success with Ghandi, who protested what he believed was an illegal occupation of India by Britain. Such “civil disobedience” in this matter might be accomplished by refusing to undergo the forced vaccination mandate, wait for the state to exclude your child from school, and have a class action lawsuit against the state for denial of fundamental Liberties, Rights, Pursuit of Happiness, and forcing wanton risk of the health/life of YOUR child for another. Such civil disobedience might be your refusal to adhere to a void law, [void law here means an ex post facto unconstitutional law]. This could force a constitutional show down with an elected official [Pan] who swore to uphold the state and federal constitutions, but clearly has shredded them.

https://www.latimes.com/…/la-pol-ca-vaccine-medical-exempti…
The state Senate passed a controversial bill Wednesday to tighten California’s already strict school immunization law, and now the Assembly must weigh the hot-button vaccine proposal that has prompted protests and reports of death threats against at least one lawmaker.
SB 276 by state Sen. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) passed the Senate 24-10. Republicans voted against the measure.
The bill comes amid the worst measles outbreak in more than 20 years, with more than 750 people diagnosed with the disease this year nationwide. Of those, 44 cases have been in California.
California has some of the strictest laws in the country requiring childhood immunizations in order to attend public or private schools. Since a 2015 law, the state has allowed for exemptions from required shots only if a doctor says there is a medical reason to skip some or all of them. Previously, parents could opt their children out of vaccinations by citing a personal or religious belief, as most states allow.
But Pan said doctors are increasingly excusing children from immunizations for questionable reasons, such as for having asthma or diabetes, prompting his proposal to allow the state’s public health department to review and potentially reject existing and newly sought medical exemptions.
Under the bill, the state Department of Public Health would decide whether the underlying condition cited by a doctor in a medical exemption meets guidelines set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Medical exemptions that have already been approved would have to be submitted to the state for inclusion in a nonpublic database by the end of 2020.
State health officials estimate that more than 40% of the 11,500 medical exemptions expected to be requested each year would be denied under the bill.
“It is our duty to protect Californians from threats to their safety,” Pan said Wednesday. “The facts are clear — vaccines keep us safe and our children safe by preventing serious infections.”
Some vaccine-skeptical parents have intensely opposed the bill, saying their children had adverse reactions to vaccines that would be deemed not severe enough to warrant a medical exemption under the bill. Hundreds of parents have attended hearings on the bill and jammed legislators’ office phone lines arguing that the state should not be able to overrule a doctor’s medical advice.
Pan’s office has reported to law enforcement death threats against the senator posted on social media related to his bill.
On Wednesday, close to 50 opponents of the bill sat in the gallery of the Senate session, at times heckling lawmakers while they debated the bill. After the bill passed, several opponents yelled “Boo.”
“This bill is unprecedented and a dangerous intrusion, not only into the doctor-patient relationship, but also the personal liberties of the parents and their children,” said Sen. Sen. Jeff Stone (R-Temecula). “With all due respect to my colleague, I support what he’s trying to do, I just don’t think SB 276 is the right tool to get us there.”

onawah

23rd May 2019, 02:25

Woman Injured by Flu Vaccine Obtains $2.49 Million Settlement from U.S. Government
5/22/19
http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/woman-injured-by-flu-vaccine-obtains-2-49-million-settlement-from-u-s-government/

"Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The Knutson and Casey Law Firm in Minnesota recently published a Press Release about one of their clients who received a $2.49 million settlement from the U.S. Government Vaccine Court due to injuries related to the annual flu shot.

A woman who was injured after receiving a flu vaccine has been compensated by U.S. Vaccine Court for her injuries, totaling $2.49 million. 39 year-old Cheron Golding received the flu vaccination in October of 2013 and was subsequently diagnosed with transverse myelitis as a result of the vaccination. She suffered from paralysis, loss of vision, and other complex injuries. She was hospitalized for several months.

The Vaccine Court reviewed the matter, along with the U.S. Justice Department who defends the cases, and a settlement was reached for her injuries that included future payments for needed care.

Golding’s attorney Randy Knutson of the Knutson + Casey law office, explained that when U.S. citizens are injured by a vaccine, they can apply to the U.S. Vaccine Court which reviews cases and provides compensation when appropriate. “This is a great program for those injured by vaccines. While injuries from vaccines are rare, when they do occur the Vaccine Court can step in and compensate folks for their injuries, and their future care.”

Attorneys who practice in vaccine court do not receive any part of the settlements. Instead the attorneys are paid a reasonable amount decided by the vaccine court, after the case has settled and the injured person receives their compensation.

Knutson says, “We consider doing these cases as partly public service. The vaccine court only pays attorneys what they think is reasonable for their time on the case. When the check arrives for the settlement, the client gets the entire amount, its tax free, and the attorney receives no part of the settlement. In this case, our client truly needed this settlement to take care of her needs, both medically and at home.”

Plaintiff Golding was represented by Randy Knutson of Knutson + Casey Law Firm, which has offices in Mankato and Edina, Minnesota. The case is entitled Golding v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 16-1132V. (Source: PR Newswire)

The annual flu shot is, by far, the most profitable and most widely distributed vaccine in the United States. As a result, it is also the most dangerous in terms of vaccine injuries and deaths. From 2006 through 2017 (latest statistics available), the U.S. Vaccine Court compensated nearly 3000 people who suffered injuries or deaths due the flu vaccine. This is more than all other vaccines in the U.S. market combined.

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/vaccine-court-settlements-through-2017.jpg

Public Largely Unaware of the Vaccine Court: Most Cases Never Litigated
the-vaccine-court

In November of 2014 the Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued the first report on America’s “Vaccine Court,” known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), in almost 15 years.

Congress gave the pharmaceutical companies immunity against lawsuits for injuries or deaths resulting in vaccines in 1986. Prior to this time, there were so many lawsuits pending against pharmaceutical companies for injuries and deaths due to vaccines, that the pharmaceutical industry basically blackmailed congress and told them that if they did not grant them legal immunity against the liabilities of vaccines, that they would quit making them. These vaccine products cannot survive in a free market, they are so bad.

The November 2014 GAO report criticized the government for not making the public more aware that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists, and that there are funds available for vaccine injuries. Therefore, the settlements represented by vaccine injuries and deaths included in government reports probably represent a small fraction of the actual vaccine injuries and deaths occurring in America today.

Vaccine Injuries are Seldom Reported
The U.S. government keeps a database of reports documenting vaccine injuries and deaths called The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The problem is that very few medical officials ever report vaccine injuries or deaths, either because they are not trained to recognize them, or due to pressure within their profession to not report them. To admit that vaccines do cause harm is professional suicide for most doctors and medical professionals.

Hence, the government reports on vaccine cases only represent a tiny fraction of the actual cases that exist.

One place we can get a glimpse of the amount of vaccine harm that is being caused in the U.S. today is to look at emergency room visits. As one can see in the VICP report above, most of the settlements are cases of harm caused by the flu vaccine.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is the most common injury suffered from the flu shot. GBS is a debilitating disease that attacks a person’s own immune system and damages their nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis. It is very similar to the symptoms one may see with polio.

If you are taken to the emergency room with signs of GBS during flu season, chances are one of the first questions the doctors will ask you is if you have received the flu shot recently. GBS is also listed as a side effect of the flu shot in the package insert.

An emergency room nurse published his experience in dealing with the volume of vaccine injuries he was seeing, and how reluctant other medical personnel were in reporting these injuries:

As an E.R. nurse, I have seen the cover up. Where do you think kids go when they have a vaccine reaction?

They go to the E.R.

They come to me.

I cannot even begin to guess how many times over the years I have seen vaccine reactions come through my E.R. Without any exaggeration, it has to be counted in the hundreds.

Sometimes it seemed like it was one or two cases in a single shift, every shift, for weeks. Then I would get a lull, and I wouldn’t catch one for a week or two, then I’d catch another case per night for a couple weeks. This was common.

Once, I was training a nursing student, about to graduate, on their E.R. experience rotation in nursing school. This student and I floated up to triage to cover the triage nurse for a break. I was quizzing them on what to ask and look for as a triage nurse on pediatric kids that came through. I made a point about asking about immunizations right out the gates. The student was puzzled, and asked why, and I told the student because we see vaccine reactions every day and it’s their job to catch it, alert the doctor and the parents, and report it to VAERS.

Some higher power apparently smiled on my attempt to open the eyes of another nurse I guess, because not even ten minutes later, a woman brought her child up to the counter. Sudden onset super high fever and lethargy. I asked if the child was up to date on vaccination.

The mother replied he had them just a few hours ago.

I glanced at the student, who looked shocked and looked back at me in disbelief. I nodded, told them to remember this, and then took the mom and her child to finish the triage in back. When I was done I came back and sat down with the student, and asked what he learned that night so far.

The first response: “What I was told about vaccines wasn’t true”.

I couldn’t have said it better. That student is going to go on to be like me, advocating for his patients with his eyes wide open.

The cases almost always presented similarly, and often no one else connected it. The child comes in with either a fever approaching 105, or seizures, or lethargy/can’t wake up, or sudden overwhelming sickness, screaming that won’t stop, spasms, GI inclusion, etc.

And one of the first questions I would ask as triage nurse, was, are they current on their vaccinations? It’s a safe question that nobody sees coming, and nobody understands the true impact of. Parents (and co-workers) usually just think I’m trying to rule out the vaccine preventable diseases, when in fact, I am looking to see how recently they were vaccinated to determine if this is a vaccine reaction.

Too often I heard a parent say something akin to “Yes they are current, the pediatrician caught up their vaccines this morning during their check up, and the pediatrician said they were in perfect health!”

If I had a dollar for every time I’d heard that, I could fly to Europe for free.

But here’s the more disturbing part.

For all the cases I’ve seen, I have NEVER seen any medical provider report them to VAERS. I have filed VAERS reports. But I am the ONLY nurse I have EVER met that files VAERS reports.

Mind you, I have served in multiple hospitals across multiple states, alongside probably well over a hundred doctors and probably 300-400+ nurses.

I’ve worked in big hospitals (San Francisco Bay Area Metro 40 bed ER, Las Vegas NV Metro 44 bed ER) and small hospitals (Rural access 2 bed ER, remote community 4 bed ER) and everything in between.

When I say NEVER, I mean NEVER.

I have even made a point of sitting in the most prominent spot at the nurses station filling out a VAERS report to make sure as many people saw me doing it as possible to generate the expected “what are you doing” responses to get that dialog going with people.

And in every case, if a nurse approached me, their response was “I’ve never done that” or “I didn’t know we could do that” or, worse “What is VAERS?” which was actually the most common response.

The response from doctors? Silence. Absolute total refusal to engage in discussion or to even acknowledge what I was doing or what VAERS was.

The big take away from that?

VAERS is WOEFULLY under reported.

I am PROOF of that. (Read the full blog post here: https://www.healthyfamiliesforgod.com/blog/2015/11/er-nurse-shares-experiences-vaccine-reactions )

nvXIqUyOdK4

In the video above, Dr. Mark Geier explains the fraud behind the flu vaccine.

Dr. Geier is NOT anti-vaccine. He is an M.D. and has a Ph.D. in genetics. He spent 10 years working at the National Institute of Health, and was a professor at Johns Hopkins University as a geneticist. He is also the author of over 150 peer-reviewed publications.

He worked on vaccine safety and efficacy for more than 30 years. He was one of four scientists that worked to replace the DTP vaccine, a vaccine that caused every child to become sick with a high fever at the time of vaccination, with the DTaP vaccine, which is a more purified vaccine and causes illness due to fever in only 3% of those vaccinated.

In the video above, he explains that the flu shot causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and that the flu shot is not very effective in preventing the flu.

He also explains that the CDC does not follow the law for vaccines in requiring long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine like they do with other vaccines, as it is impossible to test a vaccine that changes every year.

So the flu vaccine is basically an experimental vaccine that they want to give out to 300 million people every year. There are also no studies showing the safety of giving the flu vaccine to the same person every single year.

However, Dr. Geier points out that the CDC is in the business of distributing flu vaccines, because they represent 300 million doses per year, whereas all the childhood vaccines together only number 20 million.

Dr. Geier goes on to explain that flu is “the wrong thing to vaccinate against” because you have to keep re-vaccinating against it every year, unlike childhood infectious diseases, such as smallpox, that are only vaccinated for once.

Dr. Geier points out how ridiculous it is spend billions of dollars on a vaccine that might, at its best, save about 50 lives a year, when there are far more serious problems causing death that are more worthy of that kind of expenditure."

Delight

23rd May 2019, 02:28

This is showing how 5G rollout was taken out of local hands in 1986. It also touches on glyphosate. The climate since 1986 is obviously pernicious to all beings alive on earth. I am not sure that it would not be a blessing to have a Carrington event?

p0O8rB2IVGc

James Newell

23rd May 2019, 03:21

Here is a link where Infowars offers a women $10000 to prove vaccines are safe. Very good arguments here:
https://www.infowars.com/watch/?video=5cddfda1dd28360012514bbb

Delight

23rd May 2019, 05:00

I left nursing in 2010 over forced vaccination. At that time in my hospital, there was a new standard of care in which patients admitted were to be given the flu shot if they had not received one in the season (and pneumax over 65). Now one must consciously opt out. Vaccines are now called biogenics.

Nurse Whistleblower: Hospitals Vaccinating Patients by Force Without Their Knowledge

by Jefferey Jaxen
Health Impact News (https://vaccineimpact.com/2016/nurse-whistleblower-hospitals-vaccinating-patients-by-force-without-their-knowledge/)

The momentum, consciousness and continual discussion around truth and education related to vaccine injury has never been greater. Parents and communities have taken the initiative to find answers for their sons and daughters who’ve suffered severe adverse events from immunization.

Evaporating fast are the days of dead end solutions and pharmaceutical answers provided by mainstream medicine’s limited toolbox. Like an untamable ripple effect, this awakening has also encompassed the discussion around mandatory vaccination, lack of informed consent, pharmaceutical control of American healthcare and an overall lack of health freedom currently resting on a slippery slope.

The U.S. mainstream medical system and healthcare are failed establishments that have drifted away from healing to become profit-based outlets dispensing inferior and outdated pharmaceutical products. The historical direction has been clear to anyone paying attention and now it appears that the beginning of some tipping point has arrived. What it means and where it will lead is unknown. Yet the status quo of business as usual is changing moving forward as medical whistleblowers come forward and communities recoil against their loss of heath freedom.

In two short years much has changed as a result of a countrywide mobilization fueled by the whistleblowing admission of Dr. William Thompson. Known as the CDC whistleblower, Dr. Thompson went public recounting — in detail — his experience about research fraud within the U.S. Center’s for Disease Control and Prevention. The documentary film Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe supercharged the focus on the CDC’s troubled vaccine division and simultaneously exposed a heavily controlled and censored mainstream media in the U.S.

Recently, another medical/health whistleblower made immediate waves by publicly recounting her continued experiences witnessing daily routine vaccine injury in U.S. hospital neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Nurse whistleblower Michelle Rowton told of a callous medical system that regularly and inhumanly chooses to give the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule to premature infants causing massive increases in severe and life threatening adverse reactions. According to Rowton, the attending doctors and medical staff have made these routine, medically incompetent actions into jokes to be laughed at on the hospital floor and in break rooms.

Forced Flu Vaccinations
In the age of information, the incidences of whistleblowers are increasing. As health freedom and informed consent is eroding at breakneck speeds, those left with ethics, courage and humanity within such a system are keeping quiet no longer. Meeting on the first Friday of each month, the Talk About Curing Autism’s Pennsylvania chapter support meeting gathers to provide education, support and resources for families that are in need.

At a recent meeting that took place during the first week of May, a nurse was filmed using the live streaming app Periscope warning of forced flu vaccinations occurring in U.S. hospitals. In addition, the nurse gave possible solutions to the unaware, targeted public in an effort to preserve their informed consent and avoid unwanted adverse reactions. According to the new nurse whistleblower:

Since the Affordable Care Act came out, we are now — as nurses — required to ask every single patient when they come to the hospital if you’ve had your flu vaccine or your pneumococcal vaccine. If you say no to either one of those, in the computer, an order will generate that says we need to give you this vaccine. We don’t need to speak to a doctor…it’s hospital policy. It’s now health department policy that we now have to give you the vaccine.

New Signed Consent for Hospital Services Includes Vaccines – But Patients Unaware They are Granting Such Consent
The bigger, headline-making story was made as the nurse whistleblower continued:

When you go to the hospital if you need surgery — say you need a knee replacement surgery — first they’re going to ask you if you’ve had your vaccines. You’re going to say no. Then they’re going to say you need to sign this consent if you’re going to have surgery…you need to sign a consent. In the consent, there’s a word call ‘biogenics [biologics]’ and if you sign the consent saying ‘I consent for you to give me biogenics [biologics]’ — that basically means that they can give you anything that they deem necessary including vaccines. So if you say that you didn’t get a flu shot and it’s flu season and you sign the consent saying I agree to biogenics [biologics], they will give you a vaccine even when you’re under anesthesia because you already signed the consent.

How do hospitals inform the patient they have just partaken in a medical procedure (immunization) having inherent risks without being given proper informed consent? According to the nurse whistleblower, hospitals approach the subject by telling patients the following:

Unless you go and get your medical records, you will not know you got a flu vaccine. They [the hospital] may tell you at the end ‘oh by the way, you’re now covered, you’ve had the flu vaccine or you got the pneumococcal vaccine.’

Vaccines Forced on Patients Who do not Want Them in U.S. Hospitals
Is this really happening? Certainly people would be talking if it was. The nurse whistleblower goes further saying:

Two people now have reported to me last week saying that they got the vaccine; they did not want the vaccines. They did not know that the word biogenics [biologics] meant they’re going to get a vaccine.

So how can people protect themselves? According the nurse, perhaps a simple strategy can instantly combat this push towards forced vaccination now happening in U.S. hospitals. She warns:

When you sign consent for surgery, you can specifically say ‘no vaccines, I don’t want this.’ You can write an initial after what you say you do not want and they have to honor that. And if they don’t honor that, they can be sued.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines biologics using the following statements:

Biological products include a wide range of products such as vaccines….In contrast to most drugs that are chemically synthesized and their structure is known, most biologics are complex mixtures that are not easily identified or characterized.

It should be noted that the Department of Justice publishes a quarterly list of vaccine severe adverse reaction settlements and injuries. The majority of the vaccine injuries contained on the DOJ’s list are a direct result of the flu shot.

In addition, the effectiveness of the flu shot last year was 23 percent according to official CDC statistics. During manufacturing of the flu shot, the CDC and drug maker take a guess at what flu strains may be prominent for the coming year’s flu season.

Due to this fact, every flu shot is different from the previous years and therefore untested. Since the ingredients are always changing, there is no time for true safety studies to be performed. Each year, individuals undergoing the medical procedure of vaccination are considered the final phase of public safety testing for an unproven pharmaceutical product.

Furthermore, denying the patient this knowledge — and access to the manufacturer’s insert before injection — constitutes a laundry list of broken medical ethics agreements and violations of international codes protecting humans against forced medical experimentation.

7XqRxsvNc7Y

onawah

23rd May 2019, 16:11

Vaccine Rights Attorney Sent Back to Jail a Third Time for Refusing to Breach Attorney-Client Privilege
5/23/19
http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/vaccine-rights-attorney-sent-back-to-jail-a-third-time-for-refusing-to-breach-attorney-client-privilege/

"Whistle-Blower, Attorney Alan Phillips, Sent Back to Jail for THIRD Time and License Suspended for Refusing to Breach Attorney-Client Privilege
by Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom

After a hearing at Wake County Courthouse on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, Attorney Alan Phillips was was ordered back to jail for a third time, and his license was suspended for at least until his next hearing on June 24, 2019. The judge can do this up to a cumulative year in jail. So this harassment of Attorney Phillips could continue for a long time.

Alan has been already been jailed on Thursday, May 9, 2019, and on and Monday, April 29, 2019, for 48 hours each, for “contempt of court” after he refused to breach attorney client privilege.

The North Carolina State Bar is demanding that Phillips turn over years of privileged client files in a retaliatory fishing expedition lawsuit, after he filed a complaint against the bar for alleged misconduct; the Bar internally dismissed Phillips’ complaint and a subsequent follow-up complaint. Incidentally, OAMF filed a complaint that was also internally dismissed.

Alan has done nothing illegal, the NC State Bar has not provided the court any evidence of wrongdoing on Alan’s part, and this entire lawsuit is a fishing expedition to try and discover some wrongdoing on Alan’s part in an effort to silence him and/or retaliate against him for filing a complaint against the Bar.

Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom, on behalf of health freedom organizations across the country and their hundreds of thousands of followers, is demanding that both North Carolina State Governor Roy Cooper and the North Carolina Supreme Court pursue independent investigations into the State Bar’s misconduct, as required by prior legal precedence.

Who is Attorney Alan Phillips?
Alan Phillips, J.D. is a nationally recognized expert and presenter on vaccine policy and law, and is the nation’s only attorney whose practice is focused solely on vaccine exemptions and legislative activism.

He works with clients, attorneys, legislators, and activists throughout the U.S. concerning vaccines required at birth; for daycare, grade school, and college enrollment; as a condition of employment; for military members and families; for immigrants; for children of parents in child custody disputes; for international travel; and various subsets of these categories.

Attorney Phillips is a friend of OAMF and has participated in a number of our events and video interviews, including this Guillain-Barré Syndrome awareness event that took place at the Ohio Statehouse in January of 2018:

C2Z2NjR80a0

Read more including a timeline of this case at Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom:
https://ohioamf.org/blog/news/2019/05/20/whistle-blower-attorney-alan-phillips-sent-back-to-jail-for-third-time-and-license-suspended-for-refusing-to-breach-attorney-client-privilege/

onawah

23rd May 2019, 16:21

Laughing All the Way to the Bank: Vaccine Makers and Liability Protection—Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health: Part III
MAY 23, 2019
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/laughing-all-the-way-to-the-bank-vaccine-makers-and-liability-protection-conflicts-of-interest-undermine-childrens-health-part-iii/

"By the Children’s Health Defense Team

[Note: This is Part III in a series of articles adapted from the second Children’s Health Defense eBook: Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health. The first eBook, The Sickest Generation: The Facts Behind the Children’s Health Crisis and Why It Needs to End, described how children’s health began to worsen dramatically in the late 1980s following fateful changes in the childhood vaccine schedule.]

…the unprecedented health crisis beleaguering American children began around the same time that Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
When it comes to telling the story of vaccine injuries and how frighteningly commonplace they have become, denial, censorship and lies seem to be ruling the day—for now. However, future public health historians will surely acknowledge that the unprecedented health crisis beleaguering American children began around the same time—1986—that Congress let the genie out of the bottle by passing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).

While the Act marked a depressing turning point for American children and their families, it was a bonanza for the pharmaceutical industry. The industry protections offered by the Act—which essentially awarded vaccine makers blanket immunity from liability for injuries resulting from childhood vaccines, “no matter how toxic the ingredients, how negligent the manufacturer or how grievous the harm”—sparked a gold rush of vaccine development.

By the close of 2017, analysts valued the highly consolidated global pharmaceutical market at over $1.1 trillion (U.S. dollars).
The big four
The Act’s banishment of liability as a business worry catapulted vaccines from a “neglected corner of the drugs business” into a major economic driver of the medical and pharmaceutical industries. In the U.S., four companies have been the principal beneficiaries of the no-liability business environment for childhood vaccines. The four pharmaceutical giants—GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck, Pfizer and Sanofi Pasteur—manufacture every vaccine on the U.S. childhood schedule. In addition to the “big four,” companies such as Seqirus and MedImmune (AstraZeneca) have been crowding into the increasingly lucrative adult vaccine market.

By the close of 2017, analysts valued the highly consolidated global pharmaceutical market at over $1.1 trillion (U.S. dollars). The four leading vaccine makers ranked third, fifth, sixth and seventh globally in terms of total revenues. All four also registered increases in annual revenue from 2017 to 2018–5%-6% for Merck and GSK and 2%-3% for Pfizer and Sanofi.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/VaccinesManufacturers-768x710.jpg

The companies’ strong vaccine sales helped ensure these record profits. For example, Pfizer’s $136-a-shot Prevnar-13 vaccine (with four doses advised before preschool age) earned the company nearly $4 billion in a single year, “about double what it made from high-profile drugs like Lipitor and Viagra.”

There are also other factors working in favor of record-breaking vaccine profits, outlined in a 2014 report in The New York Times on “soaring” vaccine prices. These include:

Market entry of new vaccines at “once-unthinkable” prices
Reformulation of old vaccines with a higher price tag
Requirements for multiple doses and boosters
Monopoly market positions for some vaccines
Patents on manufacturing processes (vaccine patent applications rose “tenfold in the 1990s to more than 10,000”)
Guaranteed purchases by the federal government (Vaccines for Children Program)
Guaranteed coverage by private insurance and the Affordable Care Act, meaning that “patients often do not notice the prices.”
Convicted felons
None of the leading vaccine manufacturers are strangers to lawsuits or large financial settlements for drugs in their product line that, unlike vaccines, are subject to courtroom liability. Over the past decade, in fact, GSK, Pfizer, Merck and others have paid out billions in punitive settlements for products deemed to be deceptive or harmful. In the case of Merck, the company’s payouts included $950 million in federal fines following evidence of a “deliberate corporate conspiracy” related to its bestselling painkiller Vioxx. The FDA approved the drug in 1999, but Merck reluctantly withdrew it from the market in 2004 after studies showed that it doubled serious health risks and had resulted in at least 60,000 deaths. Merck pleaded guilty to criminal charges over its illegal marketing of Vioxx and settled 27,000 lawsuits for $4.85 billion.

Dubbed by some as the “Help Pay for Vioxx” vaccine, Gardasil has been a major revenue booster.
Merck enjoys a unique monopoly position for four vaccines, including its blockbuster human papillomavirus (HPV) Gardasil vaccine and both measles-mumps-rubella vaccines (MMR and MMR-plus-varicella or MMRV). Merck brought Gardasil to market in the aftermath of the Vioxx scandal. Dubbed by some as the “Help Pay for Vioxx” vaccine, Gardasil has been a major revenue booster. In a single quarter of 2016, for example, in which Merck posted a profit of $2.2 billion, the company saw a 38% jump in sales of HPV vaccines (due to “increased pricing and demand”). Similar trends have been evident for Merck’s other vaccines, with a 27% increase in MMRV vaccine sales in the same quarter of 2016 after the CDC added the vaccine to its pediatric stockpile. Growing global vaccine sales, including in China, helped Merck continue to “beat Wall Street expectations” in 2018.

What, me worry?
From a consumer standpoint, Merck’s track record with Vioxx raises the question of whether the American public can believe the company’s claims about the safety of its vaccines. Can a company that confessed to illegal activity and paid out almost $5 billion to settle lawsuits for a drug it knew to be harmful be considered trustworthy when it markets expensive and profitable vaccines such as Gardasil? The same question can be asked regarding the other vaccine manufacturers.

In 2007, Merck had to recall over a million doses of two childhood vaccines because it “could not guarantee the products’ sterility.” A year later in 2008, an investigation by the Philadelphia Inquirer described an unpublished FDA review of one of Merck’s largest U.S. vaccine plants, which identified contaminated children’s vaccines and a failure to follow good manufacturing practices. The review noted 49 areas of concern in all. What was the plant leadership’s response to the FDA’s troubling findings? “Nobody’s perfect.” Considering that pharmaceutical companies want to continue injecting our children with liability-free and largely untested vaccines from pregnancy on, this executive’s cavalier attitude hardly inspires confidence.
In our FREE eBook, Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health, CHD takes the position that conflicts of interest and unethical behavior encumber the key public and private players involved in U.S. and global vaccination programs to such an extent that public skepticism is not only understandable, but justified. The loss of confidence in vaccine safety must be addressed with independent, unbiased science. As we publish subsequent parts of the eBook, we will illustrate how lack of integrity and ethical betrayals are impeding sound public health policy and vaccine safety science, while gravely undermining children’s health.

Get your free copy of our new eBook: Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ebook-sign-up-conflicts-of-interest/ "

Delight

23rd May 2019, 22:47

Good news! I invision all states passing resolutions. Liability is the only way I can see to stop the ooze.

Bipartisan coalition of lawmakers calls for vaccine industry to once again be held liable for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines
Thursday, May 23, 2019 by: Ethan Huff (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-23-bipartisan-coalition-of-lawmakers-calls-for-vaccine-industry-to-be-held-liable.html)

(Natural News) Legislators in Minnesota have introduced four separate resolutions aimed at restoring the provisions once contained in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) that recognized the constitutional right of Americans injured or killed by vaccines to pursue rightful justice against vaccine manufacturers in a court of law.

HF 2862, HF 2825, SF 2781, and SF 2831 all take aim at the Supreme Court ruling that was made in the case of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, which “immunized” Big Vaccine against liability for adverse effects caused by its vaccines.

“In 1986, there were seven vaccines that were routinely administered to American children. Yet, there were so many catastrophic injuries caused by this schedule that some of the vaccine manufacturers threatened to stop producing them, due to the large damage awards that they were ordered to pay when people were injured,” stated Representative Jeremy Munson, a Republican from Crystal Lake, Minnesota, and the man leading the charge to make vaccine corporations liable again, during a recent press conference.

“So, the pharmaceutical industry heavily lobbied Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, or the NCVIA, in 1986. This unprecedented law established a compensation program administered by the government, and funded by a tax on vaccine consumers themselves. This was to compensate those whom were killed or harmed by vaccines.”

One of the requirements provisioned in the NCVIA mandates that doctors report any adverse vaccine reactions they observe as a result of vaccination in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Another mandates that doctors provide parents with vaccine risk and benefit information before vaccinating these parents’ children.

The power of the elements: Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality, natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap, black walnut hulls, menthol crystals and more. Zero artificial sweeteners, colors or alcohol. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store and help support this news site.

When it was first enacted, the NCVIA also provisioned that vaccine-injured or vaccine-killed petitioners who did not receive a proper judgment within a 240-day window, or who were simply not satisfied with a judgment they did receive via the NVCIP, could withdraw from the program and sue vaccine manufacturers directly in civil court. But this provision was removed in 2011 by the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth case, which means that the vaccine-injured and vaccine-killed no longer have an option at their disposal to seek justice.

“Overturning this decision, and returning the NCVIA to its original intent, is what our resolution is about,” Rep. Munson added. “This is an important check and balance that we have set up to ensure that vaccines will be safer.”

Senator Jim Abeler, a Republican and another of the resolution’s authors, also stated during the press conference that there are now so many vaccine injury claims being filed that increasingly fewer of them are being resolved in a timely and proper manner.

“How tortuous the route is to actually get a claim resolved,” Sen. Abeler stated, adding that, “we’re in a world where the Department of Health calls [vaccines] ‘exceedingly safe’ – I think that nothing is further from the truth.”

Because of the way the NCVIA has been manipulated, it has also become exceedingly difficult to keep track of what the vaccine industry is doing behind closed doors. Nobody knows for sure whether or not Big Vaccine is even safety testing its vaccines anymore, let alone conducting the “post-marketing surveillance reporting” that’s required as part of the VAERS program.

“If everyone believes that vaccines are safe, that they cause no injury or they can’t cause injury, then there should be no problem with … going back to the law that we used to have, that allowed people to seek civil cases against vaccine manufacturers,” Rep. Munson concluded.

For more news about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines, the only products sold in American today whose manufacturers aren’t held liable when they injure or kill people, be sure to visit Vaccines.news.

Sources for this article include:

AgeOfAutism.com

House.Leg.State.MN.us

House.Leg.State.MN.us

House.Leg.State.MN.us

House.Leg.State.MN.us

MNSenate.Granicus.com

NaturalNews.com

FacebookTwittergoogle_plusShare

Delight

23rd May 2019, 23:00

ThePythonicCow

23rd May 2019, 23:09

onawah

24th May 2019, 00:33

A couple of good vaccine-related posts by Houman here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1291647&viewfull=1#post1291647

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1292879&viewfull=1#post1292879

Delight

24th May 2019, 00:46

5/23/2019
SCIENCE STRIKES BACK

WaPo’s Propaganda Piece; Sunscreen Never Safety Tested?!; Institute for Scientific Freedom is Underway; Controversial Autism & Cancer Doctor Rashid Buttar Drops Bombshells.

HHwZYpOEAos

At 1:46:00 Dr.Buttar states in his opinion the VERY SAME people who do not have the ability to detox/excrete heavy metals and therefore develop neurodegenerative conditions like "autism" are those of higher intelligence (related to a genetic difference). This assault of vaccines and other toxins is an assault on the future of mankind. I know people may feel inundated by data on this thread but IMO this whole video today is really valuable.

Also so glad there are various threads all sharing the information we need to see!!!!!

Delight

24th May 2019, 02:20

Personal autonomy is supposed to be paramount in the U.S. The anomaly of vaccines in this respect is discussed. IMO Unfortunately this degree of invasive assault against a basic constitutional right makes it LOOK like there is a serious conspiracy afoot against Americans (and globally). This means that as wild eyes it may seem to assume genocide is planned, I keep thinking about the idea that anyone stupid enough to agree is considered to deserve it.

LIVE Autism One Chicago, Emord's Sacred Fire of Liberty, Robert Verkerk, FDA Unconstitutional, Trumps vs censorship, Docs refusing patients, Brian Hooker, SB276 moves forward, Alan Phillips update, Patti Finn, State mandates, Karen Thomas, Recovering from Autism and MORE!

v2tEA3Eh4b0

Delight

24th May 2019, 04:16

When you sign consent for surgery, you can specifically say ‘no vaccines, I don’t want this.’ You can write an initial after what you say you do not want and they have to honor that. And if they don’t honor that, they can be sued.
In the hospitals that I have attended in recent years while attending to my now dearly departed sister, one does not get to actually sign a printed consent form that one could annotate with such "no vaccines" directives.

Rather one gets to illegibly squiggle one's name on some sort of electronic pad, thereby "signing" that one has agreed to some long contract that is supposedly showing on the admitting nurse's computer screen.

I felt some rage at the end of my career, in the way, in a major teaching hospital always touting "excellence", nurses were passive and complicit with any and every directive. But from the first day of nursing school, one is cowed into the role as the handmaid for the system. Alan Phillips describes asking a nurse about "Why are you giving HepB vaccines to a day old baby?" She said "that's just what we do". Nurses are very nice and compliant by training. Some medical people are concerned but are afraid.

Q4UAHZisb5Y

I created a small class I called "Renta Yenta" (sorry but I liked the rhyme if it seems offensive). It was for companions at the hospital bedside. I told the class "NEVER leave a loved one alone in a hospital". I wrote up a list of things that every bedside partner needed to do. Second after never leave the patient alone, was write down every visiting professional's name and activity. Make sure everyone washes his/her hands. Ask about every medication and compare to a list of orders. Ask about side effects and purpose. Make sure the patient understands what is happening.

Also the busy body needs to Watch for changes in condition and ring to report or with questions and when the person was having pain.

Now I would add, demand a printout of the admission orders and ask the MD to delete vaccines (unless chosen by the patient). Hospitals are the most dangerous place IMO next to a war zone. That is MY experience anyway.

onawah

25th May 2019, 04:14

RFK, Jr. at Autism One Conference 2019
Children's Health Defense
May 24, 2019
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/rfk-jr-at-autism-one-conference-2019/
"RFK, Jr. spoke Thursday to a packed ballroom at the Autism One Conference about the issues facing vaccine safety science, censorship of the medical freedom movement by a pharma-bought media and how industry interests have also corrupted our government — with democracy hanging in the balance. After discussing politics, media, pharma, environment and children's health, RFK, Jr. ends by saying that this generation’s potential has been robbed. He ended by saying to parents, “What are we doing to the children in this country?...Whatever happens to me, I’m going to fight this because it’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen. I know your lives are so taken up in caring for these kids and it’s very, very difficult for you to find the time and the resources to devote to activism. But we have to do this. You are the army and we’ve got to take back our country.”
BY0RCnK77zM

Delight

25th May 2019, 17:05

Here is a link to sign a petition to end manufacturer protection from liability

End Legal Immunity (https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/296/507/102/)

I hope EVERYONE will listen to the video posted by Onawah. It clearly depicts the state of the union run by corporations and it talks about the vaccine issue as the single greatest catastrophe of our time.

BY0RCnK77zM

onawah

25th May 2019, 22:15

Unvaccinated Population Called Upon to Participate in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Legal Study
http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/unvaccinated-population-called-upon-to-participate-in-vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated-legal-study/
5/25/19
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/05/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated.jpg

( I just hope the unvaccinated and parents of unvaccinated children will be courageous enough to put their names and stories on the record, knowing what kind of persecution is now being inflicted on those in the anti-vax movement.
I make no apology for using the term "anti-vax", because I don't think ANY vaccines are good, or ever were.
I also hope Avalon will make this a subject of Intentional Meditation, along with Juian Assange.
Both causes are paramount at this time. )

Health Impact News
by Joy Garner
thecontrolgroup.org

"Hello, my name is Joy Garner. I am the founder of The Control Group, thecontrolgroup.org.

We are now conducting the largest-ever epidemiological health study of unvaccinated people in preparation for a federal lawsuit to end all vaccine mandates Nationwide.

We are NOT asking for money. We need ACTION.

Even a few minutes of time WILL make a huge difference.

Over 43% of VACCINATED children in the USA are now suffering chronic, disabling, and even deadly diseases. Our early study responses are already proving that UNvaccinated kids have almost ZERO chronic health problems AND they are far LESS susceptible to serious INFECTIOUS diseases, particularly if they did not receive an aluminum-filled vitamin K shot at birth.

As this large % of vaccine injured kids reach the ages where they would otherwise have been entering the workforce, our Nation’s economy will COLLAPSE.

Many of these children require life-long 24 hour care. This is a NATIONAL EMERGENCY.

The vaccine programs represent an imminent and existential threat to the survival of our Nation. Our study is already definitely proving what the CAUSE of all this disease and destruction is.

We are targeting August 15th, 2019 for completion of this study and then we are headed into federal court. The primary pharma “legal argument” to defend vaccine mandates, which the US Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld, is that individual rights can be violated in the name of “public health”.

However, our study already proves vaccines are DESTROYING “public health”, also causing more serious INFECTIOUS diseases.

According to the Federal Judge’s Bench Guide, true CONTROL studies are the GOLD STANDARD of evidence for proving CAUSATION, requiring it to be given the most “weight”.

Previous comparative studies (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated) have been too small, and dismissed as “statistically insignificant”.

But with the size of this study, we CAN win this, especially with Trump’s judicial appointments on board now. Our massive and now expanding study will be the most damning evidence big pharma has ever faced in a court of law.

Please consider having a spokesperson from The Control Group write an article for your publications, and/or please help spread the word about the study.

The larger our study, the more responses we get back, the more profound the evidence that vaccines are in fact the primary CAUSE of our Nation’s rapidly declining health.

The vaccine programs represent the single worst public health threat, (and economic threat) this Nation has ever seen. The vaccine programs are poised to wipe out our economy in the not-too-distant future as a result of the epidemic of devastating illnesses they are causing.

We are also preparing a report on this fact to submit to the NSA and the White House. Robert Kennedy Jr, and other good people will be able to make good use of this evidence in their own continuing legal efforts.

Again, we are NOT asking for money. We are building our case right now, and we are self-funding the legal battles ahead.

UNvaccinated people are the EVIDENCE big pharma is desperately trying to eliminate with their vaccine mandates, SO THAT the cause can never been fully proven. We MUST collect as much evidence as possible while we still can.

Once they criminalize unvaccinated people, everyone will go into hiding and we will not be ABLE to collect this data, not even with “anonymous” participants.

Our surveys CAN currently be completed anonymously. We already have plenty of “sample” witnesses who are looking forward to testifying about the good health of their unvaccinated children.

But this matter is URGENT. If we wait, NOBODY will be willing to testify or even be willing to fill out an anonymous health survey, for fear of potential prosecution.

This level of medical tyranny is already being beta-tested in New York, and it includes ADULTS in the mandates, also specifically targeting and publicly demonizing unvaccinated Jews.

If we do not put a stop to it now, our opportunity to end this madness will expire, along with our Nation.

PLEASE help us spread the word about the health survey. We must document all of this NOW before we are fully “check-mated” by pharma in this battle.

They have already drafted the laws that will mandate vaccines for ALL Americans, every man, woman, and child, under threat of criminal prosecution. They have already bribed their politicians who WILL vote yes on this destructive tyranny.

Big tech is massively clamping down on our efforts to raise awareness online, and protests only result in MORE bad laws passing, as the crooked politicians entirely ignore our cries.

We are running out of time. PLEASE call me and HELP save this Nation.

God bless you all for the work you do. And GOD BLESS AMERICA! "
Joy Garner, founder of The Control Group thecontrolgroup.org
https://www.thecontrolgroup.org/

onawah

25th May 2019, 22:26

Gov. Mills signs bill eliminating religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions
Maine Becomes the 4th State in the Union to Fail to Offer Religious and Philosophical Vaccine Exemptions, Beginning in 2021
5/25/19
by Ginger Taylor, MS
https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/05/maine-becomes-the-4th-state-in-the-union-to-fail-to-offer-religious-and-philosophical-vaccine-exempt.html
https://www.rescuepost.com/.a/6a00d8357f3f2969e20240a4897448200d-250wi
(Doesn't she look like the cat that ate the canary? I wonder what kind of kickback she got...)

"Today Governor Janet Mills, after promising Mainers that she would protect their exemptions, signed LD 798, "An Act To Protect Maine Children and Students from Preventable Diseases by Repealing Certain Exemptions from the Laws Governing Immunization Requirements."

The new law removes religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions from everywhere in Maine law. Children will lose the right to attend daycare, preschool, and k-12, if they do not comply with Maine's vaccine mandates. The measure applies to both public and private school, and will apply even to children with IEPs or 504s.

In addition, adults will no longer be allowed to attend colleges, universities or trade schools, and health care practitioners will loose their jobs, if they do not vaccinate according to Maine law.

Legislators have noted that in their tenure in the Maine Legislature they have never encountered a stronger public outcry against a bill, and opponents inside and outside the lawmaking body have vowed to continue to fight against forced vaccinations in Maine.

The crowd of Mainers gathered at the Maine State House for the final vote chanted, "WE WILL NOT CONSENT!"

The new measure will not go into effect until September of 2021, giving Mainers two years to challenge the law, and even elect a new legislature to repeal the LD 798."

Patient

26th May 2019, 04:33

I still have the mind-set that believes if I was to choose not to vaccinate my children, how are the kids who received the vaccination at risk?

Is my thinking flawed? Am I missing something?

onawah

26th May 2019, 04:48

ThePythonicCow

26th May 2019, 05:55

I still have the mind-set that believes if I was to choose not to vaccinate my children, how are the kids who received the vaccination at risk?

Is my thinking flawed? Am I missing something?

Perhaps the problem is that you're thinking.

Perhaps many parents "feel" that their vaccinated children are at risk because the main stream media and conventional doctors speak in tones of alarm of the dangers of unvaccinated children and anti-vaxxer parents.

Constance

26th May 2019, 11:32

Hervé

26th May 2019, 14:50

...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7bmK4WW0AAAwjc.jpg:large

Hervé

26th May 2019, 16:01

Infanrix Hexa – 65 Toxins Found. All Risk. No Benefit. (https://realnewsaustralia.com/2018/12/20/infanrix-hexa-65-toxins-found-all-risk-no-benefit/)

https://realnewsaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/Vaccination.jpg?w=628&h=350&crop=1

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
December 20, 2018
Originally Posted at Vaxxter.com (https://vaxxter.com/infanrix-hexa-65-toxins-found-all-risk-no-benefit/)

I’ve been saying for YEARS that we need to raise $50k to have every vaccine tested to see what is REALLY coming through that needle. This clearly came into focus for me in 2009, with the H1N1 “Swine flu” fiasco. So many people were injured and a big spike in miscarriages and stillbirths was reported. I started asking loudly:
“What’s IN that stuff? We should test those vials”
Well, it’s finally happening.

With the onset of government vaccine mandates, which suddenly required Italian children to be injected with 11 vaccines to attend school, the Italians are fighting back. First, they voted out the government that pushed for the mandates calling their movement #GovenmentofChange. Then on December 4 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/04/politically-motivated-italys-m5s-sacks-peak-board-of-health-experts), the new Italian health minister kicked out all 30 members of the health policy advisory board.

On December 13 (https://www.sott.net/article/402921-Italian-scientists-protest-funding-for-vaccine-safety-investigation), Corvelva, a scientific research group, announced it had received €10,000 (US$11,350) from the Italian National Order of Biologists (https://vaxxter.com/biologists-make-huge-vaccine-research-donation-italian-scientists-angered/) with plans to use the money to test the contents of every vaccine currently on the market. The result of their first test was released on December 16, and the report (https://www.corvelva.it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccingate-initial-results-on-infanrix-hexa-chemical-composition.html) is a doozie.

You certainly won’t hear this in the MSM.

The first vaccine they thoroughly tested was Infanrix Hexa – a six-in-one vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that is *supposed* to contain the following antigens: tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids; inactivated poliomyelitis viral strains 1-2-3; and hepatitis B surface antigen. Shockingly, Corvelva found NONE of these antigens in the vaccine, meaning, that NO antibodies to the intended antigens will be created.

And it gets worse. In addition to no vaccine antigens, they found the following:

traces of 65 chemical cross-contaminants from other manufacturing lines;

chemical toxins;

unrecognizable macromolecules;

various free bacterial peptides that are potential allergens and are capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.

These findings could bring justice to parents who lost their children in 2009 when 36 children died and more than 1,700 were injured in a “clinical trial” (https://vactruth.com/2012/12/16/36-infants-dead-after-vaccine/) – the nice name for human experimentation.

I suspect that as they continue to test each of the vaccines in the childhood schedule, they will find metallic compounds, nanotechnology and a long list of chemical contaminants. At some point, the work previously published by the Gattis’ will be vindicated. I wrote about their shocking findings in a previous article that you can find here (https://vaxxter.com/vaccine_contaminants_nano_cancer/).

Infanrix Hexa is used widely in the international market. The vaccine is all risk and literally no benefit. Its use should be stopped immediately, pending future investigation. If their testing continues to reveal ever more inconsistencies, GSK could be in serious legal problems for inappropriate labelling, poor manufacturing processes and perhaps even charged with murder.

Patient

26th May 2019, 16:12

You are only missing something if you think it is really as simple as that.
The agenda goes much deeper, imho. Think:NWO depopulation agenda.

I still have the mind-set that believes if I was to choose not to vaccinate my children, how are the kids who received the vaccination at risk?

Is my thinking flawed? Am I missing something?

I should have worded this better...when i speak to people about "not vaccinating" kids, parents always jump to the point that if i was to not vaccinate my kids, I am putting their vaccinated children at risk of getting a disease (if my child gets sic, they think their kid is at risk) and then I say, "well, if that is your concern,then it seems to me that you do have much confidence in the vaccine working for your kids then - so why risk your child's health if you think the vacccination isn't going to work anayway." And that is usually the end of the conversation and my relationship with that person.

This is such a great example of how dummied down the population is. And I have had this same conversation with people many different levels of proffessionally employed types of people. I am not kidding.

Has anyone read anywhere where it is said that an unvaccinated child can affect the vaccinated?

Patient

26th May 2019, 16:47

Delight

26th May 2019, 19:47

Unvaccinated Population Called Upon to Participate in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Legal Study

This is a fantastic step in the right direction. I would love to see comparative studies of all the unvaccinated vs vaccinated children for every country; i.e worldwide. :)

Yes, but people are already in hiding. If you have been successful in protecting your children from vaccinations, it is scary to consider participating in such a study.

I don't want to say anymore because I do not want to discourage people from speaking out against vaccines.

I know first hand how vaccinated vs unvaccinated children are.

And I know how your family is treated as a result of not vaccinating your kids.

I hope the parents of the unvaccinated kids respond to this study and that this study is only used for the purpose in which they claim it is.

I really appreciate the concern of being targeted for criticism. I appreciate that there is a climate of fear. This fear being promulgated is a nebulous and irrational and MAYBE unfounded one and yet our closest friends apparently would like to shun us over it. What if it can only hurt us because we have CHOSEN to believe "the fear" is really a threat or that being "ostracized" is more threatening than even the corporate take over? What if the prison we think we are being guided towards is the "affect" of the collective mind and the only real way to escape is to stop believing in its power?

I was reading this sermon form ML King today.

Draft of Chapter XIV,
“The Mastery of Fear or Antidotes for Fear”
July 1962-
March 1963
[July ~962-M~~h 19631
[Atlanta, Ga ] (http://okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol06Scans/July1962-March1963DraftofChapterXIV,TheMasteryofFearorAntidotesforFear.pdf)
King first developed a sermon an the subject of fear during the early years that King
assisted his father. at Ebenezer. In that sermon, developed from one that he preached
at Dexter in 1957, he draws on the work of Riverside Church ministers Harry
Emerson Fosdick and Robert McCrackem, and theologian Paul Tillich and Joshua
Liebmen, to offer ways to conquer modern feras. King identafies fear as a major
cause of war and prescribes he as its remedy “~Love. understanding and
organized goodwill can cast out fear". Or to put it another way, not [armament] but
disarmament will cast out fear, and disarmament will not become a reality until
enough goodwill and good faith are released to make mutual trust a reality

“There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear For fear has to do with
punishment, and he who fears is not perfected in love ” I John 4.18
“For God hath not pen us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a
sound mind ” I1 Timotny 1 7
Today it has become almost a truism to call our time an “age of fear” In these
days of terrifying change, bitter international tension and chaotic social disruption,
who has not experienced the paralysis of crippling fear’ Everywhere there are people depressed and bewildered, irritable and nervous all because of the monster of fear Like a nagging hound of hell, fear follows our every footstep, leaving us tormented by day and tortured by night.
Our fears assume many different disguises and dress themselves in strangely
different robes. There are those superstitious fears that range from the fear of
walking under a ladder to a fear of Friday the thirteenth There are those fears
that fall under the category of “personal anxiety” Everywhere we find men and
women facing these fears They fear bad health, so they begin to find evidence of
disease in every meaningless symptom They fear growing old, so they dose themselves with a succession of drugs advertised to keep them young When they are
not worried about their physical health, they are worried about their personalities They fear others and they fear themselves, so they are driven through life
with a sense of insecurity, a lack of self-confidence, and a nagging feeling of failure. They end up with what the psychologists call an inferiority complex
Strangely enough there are those who fear success, so they wander aimlessly down the frightenng road of excessive drink and sexual promiscuity.
How many people
have allowed endless fears to transform the sunrise of love and peace into a sunset of inner depression?
Sometimes our fears are dressed in the garments of mental phobias These nagging phobias take many forms-fear of water, fear of high places, fear of closed
rooms, fear of darkness and fear of being alone. These phobias continue to accumulate until at last many face what the psychiatrists call phobophobia-the fear of fear, being afraid of being afraid.
Then there are those economic fears which are especially real in this highly
competitive society Karen Horney has set forth the thesis that most of the psychological problems of our age grow out of this gnawing economic fear Many men
are tormented by the possible or actual failure of their businesses Others are tortured by the uncertainty of the stock market. Numerous people are plagued with
the fear of unemployment and the collapse of their careers because of a force
called automation. One of the tragic things about unemployment is that it crushes
a man’s sense of pride, drowns his spirit, and leaves him standing before his wife
and children as a disastrous failure How real and frustrating are our economic
fears!
There are, above all, the religious and ontological fears They are at [strikeout illegible] bottom the fear of death and nonbeing. The atomic bomb and nuclear
weapons have lifted the fear of death to morbid proportions More than anything
else, the haunting spectacle of possible nuclear annihilation has saturated our day
with “the spirit of fear” Hamlet’s soliloquy, “to be or not to be,” is the desperate
question falling from many trembling lips Indicative of the intensity of this contemporary fear of death is the mad quest to build fallout shelters, but the fear
increases even more when sober assessment reminds us that a shelter would be of
little use against a sizeable H-bomb In agonizing desperation we petition our governments to increase the nuclear stockpile, but we soon discover that this fanatical quest to maintain “a balance of terror” increases rather than diminishes fear, for it
leaves all nations frightfully at tiptoe stance not quite knowing which diplomatic
faux pas will result in the pushing of the fatal bottom The fear of death leaves so
many people wandering through a bleak dungeon with no hope for reaching an exit
sign.
So the problem of fear is one of the most serious problems of modern life. It
leaves so many people psychologically wrecked and spiritually dejected. It drains
one’s energy and depletes one’s resources This is why Emerson said, “He has not
learned the lesson of life who does not every day surmount a fear ”6 continue here (http://okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol06Scans/July1962-March1963DraftofChapterXIV,TheMasteryofFearorAntidotesforFear.pdf)

The subject of renouncing crosses all example.

In the last couple of days I have been listening to live stream from the autism one conference. This conference brings together people from across the country with concerns not just about autism but health, medical freedom, religious sovereignty, in addition to parents with injured children and parents whose children need help. This gathering is beautiful and points to thrival over survival.

I am really awed by the strength of this group and how they filter back into their communities and refuse to "go away and be quiet".

The media propaganda on google calls this gathering pseudoscientific and "antivax" quackery. The censorship proponents say "Don't look THERE at what they are saying. But it is gathering a broad spectrum of people who care and actively seek solutions to act for a future of health and freedom.

The assault on us is broad and deep. The move to control us is seemingly coordinated by a powerful force. For instance I heard today that California money is pouring into Texas to support removal of choice for vaccines. That means to me that this is an orchestrated take down ramping up and moving state by state.
There seems no place to hide or escape. What has been on my mind in the last couple of days is what "my" personal responsibility (ability to respond) may be? It feels overwhelming. Personally I am not a parent. Many present day activists are motivated by their personal tragedies. Also I am older and actually not worried about me.

I do care about the earth and humanity. So I am looking at my own fear of the force and how to act to resist.

One message I grok listening to many activists is that offence is more powerful than defense. I can see how the bullying is meant to make people afraid to act or even be visible. We are SUPPOSED to become defensive. We are supposed to become paralyzed.

Problem (example measles) and made reactive (fear) and then given the solution (agree to force vaccinations). If we don't do that then we are to be shunned and silenced. The suggestion was made by an activist in Texas is stating that running to a "safe" state like Texas is not possible because the assault is national.

But I think we do need to gather numbers and seek FAITH that we have power despite what fear. To risk speaking up by sharing the truth about one's healthy children will be an offensive move.... provide the information that will show vaccinations risk is dire.

IMO it is not just the vaccines but a synergetic toxic combination we face that has its beginnings before we could observe any pattern. We SEE the pattern now, IMO we are responsible to do something. IMO we must confront our fear FIRST of the toxins and the politics and the social forces that seek to paralyze.

What if FREEDOM is in the choice to stand FOR our values? What IF this world of form IS something like an illusion (maya, simulation, game)? What if this is all about how each of us must face our fears and act on our values?

Everyone of us will die so "the game" is not ultimately about hanging on to life. When some have children, maybe it is to stand for their well being and their future so valiantly that we become an "offense to the system"? If one CARES about Life even If one has no children, maybe the choices become more "abstract" and universal... what if the choice to be Fearful OR RELEASE FEAR is the one that we test ourselves against before all else?

IMO the place of what is of soul value is what matters MOST. Maybe there are authentically some humans supporting "the corporatocracy" because they sincerely LOVE this model of poison, death and destruction in the name of (what I cannot understand)? Maybe so but IMO most of the supporters (even if by being passively accepting because of "daily necessity") of the erosion of our LIFE are FEARFUL people. IMO fear is the obvious condition we must begin to change for the sake of OURSELVES.

The collective is made up of individuals.

In this "reality" where we are learning all kinds of attributes: courage, empathy, love, generosity, altruism.... we can change our MINDS. All the feelings that make us have a rush of well being start with our overcoming victories of changed minds. What IF our personal willingness to SAY NO to fear and ignore our paralysis, reject nihilism, renounce tyranny etc. (add all that one would hate to live in) is the only real POINT?

The "study" is a case in point. All who fear to add the names of their happy healthy kids to a study SHOWING the power of choice are in need of becoming able to respond DIFFERENTLY

Actually in the bIGGEST context, I think we all need to deal with FEAR before death IMO. IMO WE MAY CARRY TAKE OUR FEAR OUTTA HERE and find it makes us rinse and repeat the lesson.

"Humans Get up off your knees" was said by one wise IMO man.

Delight

26th May 2019, 20:30

Bruce Lipton on Robert Scott Bell show at the Advanced Medicine Conference

evfmLxG7JMc

onawah

26th May 2019, 21:17

A steller post, Delight. :star: Thank you!
Fear really is the test.
I feel for those people who are being called to speak the truth about vaccines and what they are up against.
I think it would be great if we make them the focus, along with Julian Assange, of our current Intentional Meditation, and I've made that request to Omi.

Probably the reason main why this issue is so difficult is that the pro-vaxxers are being asked to venture so far out of their comfort zone, entertaining the possibility that what the mainstream news is telling them about vaccines might not be the truth.
And what that implies, which is that the mainstream news might be giving them misinformation about a lot of other very important things as well--that would be overwhelming.
As the unconscious suspicions grow that this might be the case, the anxiety and fear grows as well, and as staying in denial becomes more difficult, the self-defensive acts become more aggressive.
It's a dangerous situation, and I wish I could see what the end will be...

I don't know if pointing that out to pro-vaxxers would help--they would probably just twist it around in their heads as being a distraction tactic, but perhaps if anti-vaxxers realize the full scope of the problem, it might help them to be more compassionate and able to tolerate the lambasting.
But of course, they too must also first understand that the lies aren't just about vaccines, but about many other important issues as well.

Unvaccinated Population Called Upon to Participate in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Legal Study

This is a fantastic step in the right direction. I would love to see comparative studies of all the unvaccinated vs vaccinated children for every country; i.e worldwide. :)

Yes, but people are already in hiding. If you have been successful in protecting your children from vaccinations, it is scary to consider participating in such a study.

I don't want to say anymore because I do not want to discourage people from speaking out against vaccines.

I know first hand how vaccinated vs unvaccinated children are.

And I know how your family is treated as a result of not vaccinating your kids.

I hope the parents of the unvaccinated kids respond to this study and that this study is only used for the purpose in which they claim it is.

I really appreciate the concern of being targeted for criticism. I appreciate that there is a climate of fear. This fear being promulgated is a nebulous and irrational and MAYBE unfounded one and yet our closest friends apparently would like to shun us over it. What if it can only hurt us because we have CHOSEN to believe "the fear" is really a threat or that being "ostracized" is more threatening than even the corporate take over? What if the prison we think we are being guided towards is the "affect" of the collective mind and the only real way to escape is to stop believing in its power?

I was reading this sermon form ML King today.

Draft of Chapter XIV,
“The Mastery of Fear or Antidotes for Fear”
July 1962-
March 1963
[July ~962-M~~h 19631
[Atlanta, Ga ] (http://okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol06Scans/July1962-March1963DraftofChapterXIV,TheMasteryofFearorAntidotesforFear.pdf)
King first developed a sermon an the subject of fear during the early years that King
assisted his father. at Ebenezer. In that sermon, developed from one that he preached
at Dexter in 1957, he draws on the work of Riverside Church ministers Harry
Emerson Fosdick and Robert McCrackem, and theologian Paul Tillich and Joshua
Liebmen, to offer ways to conquer modern feras. King identafies fear as a major
cause of war and prescribes he as its remedy “~Love. understanding and
organized goodwill can cast out fear". Or to put it another way, not [armament] but
disarmament will cast out fear, and disarmament will not become a reality until
enough goodwill and good faith are released to make mutual trust a reality

“There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear For fear has to do with
punishment, and he who fears is not perfected in love ” I John 4.18
“For God hath not pen us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a
sound mind ” I1 Timotny 1 7
Today it has become almost a truism to call our time an “age of fear” In these
days of terrifying change, bitter international tension and chaotic social disruption,
who has not experienced the paralysis of crippling fear’ Everywhere there are people depressed and bewildered, irritable and nervous all because of the monster of fear Like a nagging hound of hell, fear follows our every footstep, leaving us tormented by day and tortured by night.
Our fears assume many different disguises and dress themselves in strangely
different robes. There are those superstitious fears that range from the fear of
walking under a ladder to a fear of Friday the thirteenth There are those fears
that fall under the category of “personal anxiety” Everywhere we find men and
women facing these fears They fear bad health, so they begin to find evidence of
disease in every meaningless symptom They fear growing old, so they dose themselves with a succession of drugs advertised to keep them young When they are
not worried about their physical health, they are worried about their personalities They fear others and they fear themselves, so they are driven through life
with a sense of insecurity, a lack of self-confidence, and a nagging feeling of failure. They end up with what the psychologists call an inferiority complex
Strangely enough there are those who fear success, so they wander aimlessly down the frightenng road of excessive drink and sexual promiscuity.
How many people
have allowed endless fears to transform the sunrise of love and peace into a sunset of inner depression?
Sometimes our fears are dressed in the garments of mental phobias These nagging phobias take many forms-fear of water, fear of high places, fear of closed
rooms, fear of darkness and fear of being alone. These phobias continue to accumulate until at last many face what the psychiatrists call phobophobia-the fear of fear, being afraid of being afraid.
Then there are those economic fears which are especially real in this highly
competitive society Karen Horney has set forth the thesis that most of the psychological problems of our age grow out of this gnawing economic fear Many men
are tormented by the possible or actual failure of their businesses Others are tortured by the uncertainty of the stock market. Numerous people are plagued with
the fear of unemployment and the collapse of their careers because of a force
called automation. One of the tragic things about unemployment is that it crushes
a man’s sense of pride, drowns his spirit, and leaves him standing before his wife
and children as a disastrous failure How real and frustrating are our economic
fears!
There are, above all, the religious and ontological fears They are at [strikeout illegible] bottom the fear of death and nonbeing. The atomic bomb and nuclear
weapons have lifted the fear of death to morbid proportions More than anything
else, the haunting spectacle of possible nuclear annihilation has saturated our day
with “the spirit of fear” Hamlet’s soliloquy, “to be or not to be,” is the desperate
question falling from many trembling lips Indicative of the intensity of this contemporary fear of death is the mad quest to build fallout shelters, but the fear
increases even more when sober assessment reminds us that a shelter would be of
little use against a sizeable H-bomb In agonizing desperation we petition our governments to increase the nuclear stockpile, but we soon discover that this fanatical quest to maintain “a balance of terror” increases rather than diminishes fear, for it
leaves all nations frightfully at tiptoe stance not quite knowing which diplomatic
faux pas will result in the pushing of the fatal bottom The fear of death leaves so
many people wandering through a bleak dungeon with no hope for reaching an exit
sign.
So the problem of fear is one of the most serious problems of modern life. It
leaves so many people psychologically wrecked and spiritually dejected. It drains
one’s energy and depletes one’s resources This is why Emerson said, “He has not
learned the lesson of life who does not every day surmount a fear ”6 continue here (http://okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol06Scans/July1962-March1963DraftofChapterXIV,TheMasteryofFearorAntidotesforFear.pdf)

The subject of renouncing crosses all example.

In the last couple of days I have been listening to live stream from the autism one conference. This conference brings together people from across the country with concerns not just about autism but health, medical freedom, religious sovereignty, in addition to parents with injured children and parents whose children need help. This gathering is beautiful and points to thrival over survival.

I am really awed by the strength of this group and how they filter back into their communities and refuse to "go away and be quiet".

The media propaganda on google calls this gathering pseudoscientific and "antivax" quackery. The censorship proponents say "Don't look THERE at what they are saying. But it is gathering a broad spectrum of people who care and actively seek solutions to act for a future of health and freedom.

The assault on us is broad and deep. The move to control us is seemingly coordinated by a powerful force. For instance I heard today that California money is pouring into Texas to support removal of choice for vaccines. That means to me that this is an orchestrated take down ramping up and moving state by state.
There seems no place to hide or escape. What has been on my mind in the last couple of days is what "my" personal responsibility (ability to respond) may be? It feels overwhelming. Personally I am not a parent. Many present day activists are motivated by their personal tragedies. Also I am older and actually not worried about me.

I do care about the earth and humanity. So I am looking at my own fear of the force and how to act to resist.

One message I grok listening to many activists is that offence is more powerful than defense. I can see how the bullying is meant to make people afraid to act or even be visible. We are SUPPOSED to become defensive. We are supposed to become paralyzed.

Problem (example measles) and made reactive (fear) and then given the solution (agree to force vaccinations). If we don't do that then we are to be shunned and silenced. The suggestion was made by an activist in Texas is stating that running to a "safe" state like Texas is not possible because the assault is national.

But I think we do need to gather numbers and seek FAITH that we have power despite what fear. To risk speaking up by sharing the truth about one's healthy children will be an offensive move.... provide the information that will show vaccinations risk is dire.

IMO it is not just the vaccines but a synergetic toxic combination we face that has its beginnings before we could observe any pattern. We SEE the pattern now, IMO we are responsible to do something. IMO we must confront our fear FIRST of the toxins and the politics and the social forces that seek to paralyze.

What if FREEDOM is in the choice to stand FOR our values? What IF this world of form IS something like an illusion (maya, simulation, game)? What if this is all about how each of us must face our fears and act on our values?

Everyone of us will die so "the game" is not ultimately about hanging on to life. When some have children, maybe it is to stand for their well being and their future so valiantly that we become an "offense to the system"? If one CARES about Life even If one has no children, maybe the choices become more "abstract" and universal... what if the choice to be Fearful OR RELEASE FEAR is the one that we test ourselves against before all else?

IMO the place of what is of soul value is what matters MOST. Maybe there are authentically some humans supporting "the corporatocracy" because they sincerely LOVE this model of poison, death and destruction in the name of (what I cannot understand)? Maybe so but IMO most of the supporters (even if by being passively accepting because of "daily necessity") of the erosion of our LIFE are FEARFUL people. IMO fear is the obvious condition we must begin to change for the sake of OURSELVES.

The collective is made up of individuals.

In this "reality" where we are learning all kinds of attributes: courage, empathy, love, generosity, altruism.... we can change our MINDS. All the feelings that make us have a rush of well being start with our overcoming victories of changed minds. What IF our personal willingness to SAY NO to fear and ignore our paralysis, reject nihilism, renounce tyranny etc. (add all that one would hate to live in) is the only real POINT?

The "study" is a case in point. All who fear to add the names of their happy healthy kids to a study SHOWING the power of choice are in need of becoming able to respond DIFFERENTLY

Actually in the bIGGEST context, I think we all need to deal with FEAR before death IMO. IMO WE MAY CARRY TAKE OUR FEAR OUTTA HERE and find it makes us rinse and repeat the lesson.

"Humans Get up off your knees" was said by one wise IMO man.

Delight

26th May 2019, 22:00

I think one of the reasons why this issue is so difficult is that the pro-vaxxers are being asked to venture far out of their comfort zone, entertaining the possibility that what the mainstream news is telling them about vaccines might not be the truth.
And what that implies, which is that the mainstream news might be giving them misinformation about a lot of other very important things as well--that would be overwhelming.
As the unconscious suspicions grow that this might be the case, the anxiety and fear grows as well, and as staying in denial becomes more difficult, the self-defensive acts become more aggressive.
It's a dangerous situation, and I wish I could see what the end will be...
It is so wacky that Mike Adam's song Be Divergent has been "in the air" (on Bell's show and I found it too).

tPchx8L8QMM

I think we have been seeing the same mechanism in all affronts to a world "our hearts know is possible" (Charles Eisenstein). MAKE US DOUBT WHO WE ARE! In the video I posted, Bruce Lipton's work "the Honeymoon Effect" was referenced and THEN Bell talking afterwards about "the power of love" acted a little bashful as if people would think he had gone off the deep end.

That in itself is pretty telling for me. People all over the spectrum are afraid and doubtful Will we be seen as TOO divergent from "facts" to be trusted (even by our rational aspect of self)? IMO there are many toes in the water when the cure will be throwing oneself off the deep end.

The idea of INTENTION is predicated on a VERY woowoo concept... that what we expect with every fiber of being is more powerful than all evidence. The interesting and so important tak away about INSPIRATION then implementation when paradigms collide is that we cannot straddle the fence about " are we CAUSE or are we AFFECT of the world.

I have been listening to all sorts of paradigm change information for decades. the paradigm gap and it is HUGE. IMO it gets down to faith that we are CHILDREN of GOD, not a god in some little form but the very CREATOR of the Universe with all the RIGHTS and RESPONSIBILITIES inherent in our DIVINE status... including the power to create heaven on earth.

It may be that we individually MUST make this true ourselves on the small scale or WE WILL never see it even if its all around us? The forces are ranged against us? TRUE FAITH cannot be moved. It may then show up in our environment.

The CREATOR made our bodies perfect reflection of LIFE which informs the "vitalist" perspective. That IMO means to me that we can live a full and beautiful example of this power in daily life. Maybe that is the battle... between those who want us to forget we are of GOD and those who want us to be afraid of everything and those who know WHO we really are.

IMO if we TRULY understand our own status, we have no fear. This means we are imperturbable in the face of evil and when we leave this mortal material (whatever it is), we will not need ever to come back and GROK that. Because IMO when we KNOW who we are in the face of all simulated evil (live backwards), we escape the wheel. Maybe those who die with conscious awareness of being Divine WILL gravitate to realms beyond the duality struggle?

Pure INTENTION acts for the highest good (because GOD is good) IMO and must be effective. It may be that we will never see how our INTENTION is reflected ultimately in "time" but IMO if we INTEND purely, we MUST also receive the highest good too.

I am feeling this truth today. It inspires courage. "You (whatever) are NOT the boss of me!" I am going to say like Bobby Kennedy, that no matter what happens, I will stand with humanity (humanity is God's childhood). I will not doubt we deserve to live in truth, freedom, beauty and WILL succeed.

Delight

26th May 2019, 22:57

I found The Honeymoon Effect in pdf form. We are love but we forgot and if we remember that personal and planetary love feel like a honeymoon, AHHHHHH. And if we just realized that love is all we need?

That still does not mean to me that we don't act but IMO we (I since this is what I grappling with...) can't be healed and still act from fear, anger and grief but from power that has the vision of those who know who we are.

For instance, I to fear I will not be able to meet my needs while in resistance, start fighting others, or succumb to deep depression when events look bad.... seems self defeating. Growing edge....

For
Heaven on Earth
Through
Love for ourselves
Love for one another
Love for our planet

The Honeymoon Effect: The Science of Creating heaven on Earth (http://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/Ex-Illuminati%20Jay%20Parker%20Free%20Your%20Mind%201-4%20Conference%20%282011-2016%29/ebooks%201/The%20Honeymoon%20Effect%20-%20Bruce%20Lipton.pdf)

we can’t just sit in an easy chair and then one day get up and open the door to
greet the new world. Evolution is an active process not a passive one, and every one of us
has to be a participant. I subscribe not only to Lovelock’s Gaia theory but also to his wise
advice about avoiding “us versus them” thinking:
If we are all to live well with the Earth and survive this century, we have to
understand that to strive for human rights alone is not enough. We have to understand
that we and all living things from bacteria to trees, from amoeba to whales are all part
of this great living Earth System. Most important, we have to act personally and not
expect others to do our duty … We tend far too much to seek scapegoats, people to
blame for the environmental troubles, whereas it is us all. We determine everything
we do and we’ve got to keep that in mind.
2
I grant you that it’s difficult to follow Lovelock’s advice when reading depressing
headlines about oil spills and corrupt business and political leaders. I find it a lot easier to
avoid scapegoating when I focus on noble gases doing their part to change the world.
That’s why I decided to end this chapter by introducing you to a few of the noble gases
I’ve had the privilege of connecting with on my long and fascinating journey from agnostic
scientist to spiritual scientist.
Roses, Tulsi, and Dignity
When Margaret and I received an invitation to travel to India to meet Bharat Mitra and
Bhavani Lev, we felt compelled to go. How could we resist meeting in person (not just on
Skype) a couple who had founded a loving community and company called ORGANIC
INDIA, whose philosophy embraces Gaia: “Creation is one. The Earth is one. We are
one.”
Like many Westerners, Bharat Mitra (from Israel) and Bhavani (from the United States)
went to India as spiritual seekers. In India, they found a guru, Sri H. W. L. Poonja (Papaji),
and a simpler life. But unlike most pilgrims, they stayed in India to make Lucknow (the
capital of the state of Uttar Pradesh and where they lived with Papaji) their home and the
headquarters of ORGANIC INDIA. Says Bhavani, “We felt called to start an organic
revolution in India.” Acting as enlightened noble gas excimers, Bharat Mitra and Bhavani
excited other “noble-gas” participants to create a community to share their light, not only
among themselves but with the rest of the world as well.
They started their revolution in 1997 in the town of Azamgarh. In the ’60s, many
farmers in this community had embraced the high-tech “Green Revolution” farming
methods that Western corporations had introduced to India. They mortgaged their farms
and lives to buy the promise of costly genetically modified seeds; and then had to borrow
more to pay for the synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and modern irrigation projects required
to grow the genetically modified plants. The goal was to fend off the country’s famines
that had once been considered inevitable, and at first it seemed to work. Yields increased
and formerly poverty-stricken towns and the farmers who lived in them prospered.
But by the time ORGANIC INDIA started its work in Azamgarh, many farmers had
become disillusioned and desperate. Their fields had indeed turned green but in the process
had sucked up so much groundwater that they needed to dig deeper and deeper wells and
borrow more and more money. The genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and
petrochemical sprays produced an environmental disaster with devastating consequences.
Monsanto’s GMO “monster crops” accelerated depletion of soil nutrients, creating plant
blight, which in turn led to an invasion of destructive insects. The farmers had to borrow
more money to buy more and more chemicals to grow their crops to fend off pests that had
become resistant. In the last decade, nearly 200,000 Indian farmers, unable to continue to
work their depleted land and unable to make loan payments, took their own lives—many
by drinking the very pesticides they had been told would ensure a good livelihood for them
and their families.
3
Unsurprisingly, when ORGANIC INDIA arrived in Azamgarh, farmers were suspicious
of more Westerners asking them to radically change the way they work. And just as a
practical matter, they were leery of becoming organic farmers, because it takes at least
three years to certify a field as organic.
Despite these suspicions, one farmer named Kailash Nath Singh decided to take a
chance by going organic on his small, three-acre farm. That small step couldn’t have been
more symbolic; not only was Singh going back to the way his ancestors had farmed but he
was doing it with the ancient crop tulsi (also called holy basil), a wild medicinal herb that
has been used for thousands of years in traditional Indian medicine (Ayurveda) to heal
body and mind.
Now, thanks to ORGANIC INDIA’s subsidies during their transition, 15 years later
there are 1,000 organic farmers in Azamgarh and 20,000 around the country. The stories
these grateful farmers tell are incredibly moving and a testament to the sustainability of
organic farming—constant enrichment of the soil, healthier livestock, fewer miscarriages,
and thriving children. Says Kailash Nath Singh, “Organic farming has come as a real
blessing for our family. Our succeeding generations will reap the benefits and realize how
the land has not lost its fertility due to heavy use of chemicals.”
I can’t tell you how inspiring it was for Margaret and me to see women and men
working in organic tulsi, psyllium, and intoxicatingly fragrant rose fields (used in their
fabulous Tulsi Sweet Rose Tea), cultivating their crops in a sustainable way. They are
literally healing the Earth one field at a time. Says Bharat Mitra, “It’s not only that they
have sustainable income, not only that the environment is healthy, not only that their
livestock is doing well, not only their own health has improved so significantly, but they
have the dignity of being farmers again. How beautiful. How natural. How simple.”

Sandy123

26th May 2019, 23:11

Italy's life expectancy is going up and the infant mortality rate is going down. While the U.S. Is losing life expectancy the past two years and we are still at the bottom in infant mortality. Same with Japan who has lower vaccine schedules. Its plain to see something is going on here in the U.S. where we are 5% of the world population but take 51% of the pharmaceuticals.

Delight

27th May 2019, 00:04

Litigation for HPV injury may be taken outside the vaccine court in the US. IMO we have to be activists because we know to love you is to love me.

FDA OKs HPV Vaccine for Adults Up to Age 45
Previously approved for individuals ages 9 to 26 years by Ian Ingram, Deputy Managing Editor, MedPage Today
October 07, 2018 (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:1PYvAfnv5gkJ:https://www.medpagetoday.com/obgyn/cervicalcancer/75551+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)
SAVE
SAVED

WASHINGTON -- The FDA expanded the approval of Gardasil 9, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, to include men and women ages 27 to 45, the agency announced Friday.

"Today's approval represents an important opportunity to help prevent HPV-related diseases and cancers in a broader age range," said Peter Marks, MD, PhD, director of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, in a statement.

The CDC estimates that HPV vaccination can prevent more than 90% of HPV-related cancers, which most commonly include those of the cervix and oropharynx, as well as penile, anal, vaginal, and vulvar cancers.

In all, an estimated 31,000 new HPV-related cases are diagnosed in the U.S. each year. In women, roughly 12,000 new cervical cancer cases are diagnosed each year and 4,000 die from the disease.

In 2014, the agency first approved Gardasil 9 for individuals ages 9 to 26. It covers nine types of HPV, including seven that can lead to cancer (16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58).

An earlier version of the vaccine first came to market in 2006 -- marketed as Gardasil and covering four types of HPV -- for HPV prevention in girls and women ages 9 years to 26. This indication was later expanded to include boys and men in this same age group.

Questions have been raised at various times over the vaccine's safety, but most studies have found the vaccine to be safe, including a study conducted in women during early pregnancy. The FDA reports that the safety of Gardasil 9 was evaluated in roughly 13,000 individuals, with injection site pain, swelling, headaches, and redness being the most frequently reported adverse events.

The efficacy data for the new approval comes from both earlier studies with the 4-valent HPV vaccine and a study of the newer 9-valent version.

For women ages 27 to 45, the vaccine was studied in roughly 3,200 women who were followed for 3.5 years on average. The vaccine was 88% effective in preventing persistent infection; genital warts; precancerous cervical, vaginal, and vulvar lesions; and HPV-related cervical cancers (for types covered by the vaccine).

In men ages 27 to 45 years, the approval was based on both the efficacy data in women for this age group, the earlier trials in boys and younger men, and immunogenicity data from a trial of 150 men in this older age group.

Published on May 24, 2019
Worldwide, health authorities and vaccine stakeholders have witnessed and virtually ignored the devastation left in the wake of HPV vaccination programs. The official position is nearly always the same: coincidence, mass hysteria, psychosis, invented illness, ad nauseum... Is there any hope for the families of HPV vaccine survivors? The SaneVax team believes the answer is 'yes'! Mr. Krakow will focus on our experience thus far with obtaining justice for HPV vaccine-injury victims in the justice system.

Robert J. Krakow, JD
Robert J. Krakow, Esq., is the principal at the Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, PC, in New York. He specializes in vaccine injury claims, toxic torts, medical malpractice, civil litigation, criminal law, and more. His CV includes: Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, New York, Bureau Chief; and Office of the District Attorney, County of New York, Assistant District Attorney. Robert was the chairman of the nonprofit Lifespire, serving individuals with developmental challenges.

Norma Erickson
In 2010, Norma Erickson established SaneVax Inc. as a direct response to the worldwide devastation left in the wake of HPV vaccination programs. The SaneVax team believes no vaccine should be approved for public use without first being scientifically proven Safe, Affordable, Necessary and Effective. At no time from concept through administration have HPV vaccines met any of these common-sense criteria. Therefore, she and the SaneVax team have made it their mission to create a world where only scientifically proven SANE vaccines and vaccination practices are allowed.

qUu0pZT30GU

Ustnqv6Tm5E

more from the conference

The social, economic & health chaos that a single vaccine has created in Carmen de Bolívar, Colombia

Published on May 24, 2019
In 2013, the Colombian Congress decreed that the Gardasil vaccine against HPV was "free and mandatory". When the vaccination began, hundreds of girls in Carmen de Bolívar began to faint and suffer seizures. The government commissioned a study which concluded that the vaccine was safe and that it was a case of "mass psychogeny." It is not surprising that this prefabricated "conclusion" was also presented in other parts of the world. Five years later, another government study has concluded that the girls are sick, that the cause is unknown and that they need urgent attention, which is still not being provided. Three girls have died, more than a hundred have tried to commit suicide because of their situation of pain and disability and more than a thousand continue to suffer, without a diagnosis relating their illnesses to the vaccine. Many families have sold their belongings (houses, cars, land) to obtain allopathic treatment that in the best of cases has not worked at all or has worsened the girls' condition. Families are collapsing economically and losing their faith, as they see their sick daughters languishing. According to one of the parents of those affected: "We have 214 acts signed by the national government (...) but they do not comply with anything, and that is how it have have kept us all these five years and our daughters are getting worse." In this talk, I will discuss the social, economic and health chaos that a single vaccine has created in this Colombian town and the government's negligence in failing to recognize that there are victims of the Gardasil vaccine and that they need immediate treatment. For this purpose I'll be visiting the town of Carmen de Bolívar, since the press in Colombia has neglected this story. I will be conducting interviews with victims, families, and health authorities in order to be able to provide firsthand and current information about this tragic situation caused by the Gardasil vaccine.

Mario Lamo-Jimenez

5CNqX_UHAmo

Constance

27th May 2019, 00:13

Constance

27th May 2019, 00:31

I am feeling this truth today. It inspires courage.

Good on you Delight! :sun: You reminded me of this quote.

Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it;
Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.

"You (whatever) are NOT the boss of me!"

My son inspires courage in me. When he was really tiny he used to say to me, "Mama, you are NOT the boss of me!"

I think about my son's future children, and their childrens children and all the generations of children to follow and I know that I have to be courageous for all those future children.

I am going to say like Bobby Kennedy, that no matter what happens, I will stand with humanity (humanity is God's childhood). I will not doubt we deserve to live in truth, freedom, beauty and WILL succeed.

For years, my son and I had a nightly bedtime ritual. As we lay there on his bed, I would ask him, "What beauty, goodness and freedom have you experienced today?"

Throughout the day, I would consciously immerse my son in all the qualities of beauty, goodness and freedom. So much of humanity has a reality where beauty, goodness and freedom does not exist. My hope is that someday, my son will grow up to be a future role model to inspire and aid others. :flower:

Delight

27th May 2019, 01:46

For years, my son and I had a nightly bedtime ritual. As we lay there on his bed, I would ask him, "What beauty, goodness and freedom have you experienced today?"

Throughout the day, I would consciously immerse my son in all the qualities of beauty, goodness and freedom. So much of humanity has a reality where beauty, goodness and freedom does not exist. My hope is that someday, my son will grow up to be a future role model to inspire and aid others. :flower:

Thanks very much! I am certain he will be inspiring and assist others from your love and now his love of these qualities! I look for them also.

Maine eliminated philosophical and religious exemptions but at least the news covered the argument with some significance communicated. I think more and more people are realizing something is afoot.

Protestors rally at Maine Statehouse against mandatory vaccination bill

5DV7L9-abHs

Delight

27th May 2019, 02:52

JULY 22, 2018 ·
Autoimmunity following Gardasil (https://helenlobato.com/tag/pompilio-martinez/)

Have you noticed how many young girls who have become so unwell following Gardasil report the worsening of their symptoms after the second shot.

This research by Pompilio Martinez, MD from the School of Medicine, National University of Colombia explains why.

https://allthenewsthatmatters.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/screen-shot-2018-07-21-at-2-41-34-pm.png?w=500

Martinez’s survey reveals an overall pattern of peripheral nervous system damage as demonstrated by complaints of inflammatory and neuropathic pain syndromes in the head, back, chest, arms and legs. There were also sensory and motor syndromes with upper and lower limb numbness and tingling (paraesthesia), muscle weakness and difficulty walking (paresis) accompanied by tremors, muscle spasms and twitches (abnormal movements).

Pompilio Martinez describes the neurological symptoms of 62 girls who were vaccinated against the human papilloma virus (HPV). The quadrivalent HPV vaccine Gardasil was given to 61 Colombian girls and and the bivalent Cervarix was administered to one Mexican girl.

Martinez’s survey reveals an overall pattern of peripheral nervous system damage as demonstrated by complaints of inflammatory and neuropathic pain syndromes in the head, back, chest, arms and legs. There were also sensory and motor syndromes with upper and lower limb numbness and tingling (paraesthesia), muscle weakness and difficulty walking (paresis) accompanied by tremors, muscle spasms and twitches (abnormal movements).

It was found that most of these debilitating symptoms developed after the second shot of the HPV vaccine which corresponds to the greater antibody titres that occurs after booster vaccines. Dr Martinez explains the common process of adding an aluminium adjuvant to the vaccine in order to strengthen the immune response and subsequent antibody production.

However as a result a serious problem can occur if antibodies attack other tissues in the body inducing a process called ‘molecular mimicry’. These are called ‘cross-reacting’ antibodies or auto-antibodies and are capable of inducing disease in the body.

https://allthenewsthatmatters.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/screen-shot-2018-07-21-at-6-00-32-pm.png?w=500

Initial exposure to the vaccine or infection induces the production of immunoglobulin which increases over several weeks after vaccination. Then with a repeated dose of the vaccine body cells are reactivated causing very high antibody concentration. Importantly these cross- reacting antibodies are reactivated also and minor damage can be worsened.

Some of these examples of molecular mimicry manifest as nerve demyelination and are experienced as muscle weakness, numbness and neuropathic pain. Some very unfortunate girls and boys develop respiratory muscle problems and require intubation and ventilation.

One of the striking findings of the survey was that symptoms developed after the second dose of the HPV vaccine. After the first dose only 15-30% of girls had symptoms but 48-80% were symptomatic after second dose. Symptom onset and disease severity increase with doses because of increased antibody titres.

This is what we are seeing in the girls who have become unwell after 2 or 3 doses of Gardasil. Frequently their stories are of worsening disease after the second dose of Gardasil.

https://allthenewsthatmatters.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/high-res.jpg?w=409&h=547

In my book Gardasil: Fast-Tracked and Flawed I wrote about Australian woman Kristin Clulow and her battle with ill health following Gardasil. In May 2008, the 26-year-old Australian woman received the first dose of Gardasil, one of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines on the market. Two weeks later, the fit young woman fell and broke her left foot and although perplexed at the ease at which she had incurred her fracture, she didn’t think the two events were connected. In August 2008, she dutifully turned up at her doctor’s office for her second shot of Gardasil. But shortly after this injection, Kristin’s health began to unravel. It started with a temporary loss of vision and mobility problems that made it impossible for her to run, jump, dance or wear her beloved heels. Then her handwriting failed her: “Handwriting just doesn’t suddenly go,” she cried. Worse was to come when Kristin’s speech became slurred: “They thought I’d had a stroke.” Kristin’s story is all too common with adverse effects following the HPV vaccines now well over 80,000 according to the World Health Organisation’s database.

Interpretation of the study

We can infer that auto-antibody concentration paralleled symptoms suffered by girls who became sick by Gardasil. That is, antibodies elicited by the first dose caused symptoms in a few girls; while greater antibody concentrations with a second dose would cause a greater number of them to fall sick. Although we have no lab evidence of antibodies changing in this fashion we don’t need it, since it’s a very well-established scientific fact that serum antibody titres change with vaccine doses

Clinical evidence

In the study it was found that when the girls were re-exposed to vaccine antigens the auto-antibodies rose and relapse occurred. When the auto-antibodies were removed then there was clinical improvement. Partial remission has been achieved with antibody removal therapies such as IVIg ( a solution of human plasma proteins and plasmapheresis (a process that filters the blood and removes harmful antibodies).

Valentina’s story

https://allthenewsthatmatters.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/screen-shot-2018-07-21-at-5-47-34-pm.png

After two doses of Gardasil, Valentina developed flaccid paralysis in at least five muscle groups in her body. The young Colombian woman could not breathe and was intubated and ventilated and given plasmapheresis ridding her blood of the autoantibodies that had caused her paralysis.

https://allthenewsthatmatters.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/screen-shot-2018-07-21-at-6-06-31-pm.png

This procedure is used for treating many autoimmune diseases which are increasing rapidly. It is not a treatment that is undertaken lightly with risks of complications as well as costing thousands of dollars. This is why there has to be more independent research such as what has been elicited by Martinez in Colombia. It is vital that the public understand the risks of these vaccines that are being given to teenagers all over the world.

How can we let this happen? All over the world girls and boys are becoming very ill after being vaccinated against HPV said to causing cervical cancer. But there is no scientific proof that the vaccine has ever prevented a single case of the cancer. Cervical cancer is well detected by Pap smear programs. There is no need for these harmful vaccines.

Is this intentionally causing infertility in boys and girls? (https://helenlobato.com/2019/02/15/is-this-intentionally-causing-infertility-in-boys-and-girls/)

What if you had known? (https://vimeo.com/313117294) was the title of a recent talk given by Dr Sherri Tenpenny at a public debate on HPV vaccines organised by Courtenay Heading of Jurby Wellness, a multi national open Science collaboration-passionate about wellness.

To date, I have logged well over 20,000 hours of personal time researching to expose this 200-year mistake. I have collected more than 5,000 mainstream articles into my subscription website, the Vaccine Research Library. These articles, and more, lay bare the travesty, greed, conflicts of interest and sordid politics behind vaccination.

I look forward the day when parents stop poisoning their children because they blindly follow the advice of an under-informed “authority figure” in a white coat. The day is approaching, through the efforts of many, when adults will be more fearful of what is coming through that needle and the potential consequences of a life time of poor health and medical travesties than they are of a fever, a rash, a cough and diarrhea — the core symptoms of childhood diseases. – Sherri Tenpenny

Sherri Tenpenny begins her powerful presentation on Gardasil and Gardasil 9
Probably one of the most unnecessary, most toxic, most destructive vaccines they have come up with yet.

She calls for a change of language in regard to vaccines stating that we need to use the word infection rather than disease. The difference is that infections come and go whereas diseases come from vaccines.

Vaccines are not safe and effective.

The American osteopathic physician and anti-vaccination activist reminds us of the flawed nature of vaccines when she states that if someone develops antibodies after a vaccination the vaccine is called effective when in reality these antibodies are ‘a marker of contamination’.

Gardasil and Gardasil 9

There are greater than 150 serotypes of the human papilloma virus (HPV) that are supposed to cause cervical cancer. However as Tenpenny states:

I think there is an association not causality. HPV infections come and go…like the common cold

For in fact 98% of HPV infections resolve within 2 years. There is some US data which shows that only 3.45% of women tested positive for the 4 HPV strains that became part of the Gardasil vaccine and only 2% tested positive to HPV 16 and 18.

Tenpenny asks:

Why did we develop a vaccine for these strains when women didn’t have these anyway.

We are reminded that the CIN classification does not determine how much cancer is present in the cervical cells but is a marker for how much infection and inflammation there is in the cells. It can depict the potential for the cells to become cancerous. When there is cancer, viruses such as HPV adhere to these tissues but this doesn’t mean that the viruses caused the cancer.

The virus is blamed so we can have a vaccine and this is what happened.

Why do some HPV infections fail to resolve?
Most people have an HPV infection at some stage in their lives but these are usually resolved within two years. However in a small minority of cases these infections do not spontaneously resolve.

Tenpenny listed the risks factors that prevent the resolution of the HPV virus in some women.

Smoking; parity or number of births; number of sexual partners; the continued use of oral contraceptives and poor nutrition.

VLP’s or virus-like particles
As I have pointed out in my book Gardasil:Fast-Tracked and Flawed and reiterated by Sherri Tenpenny, Gardasil vaccines do not even contain the HPV virus.

Developing the vaccine was not straightforward for “HPV proved impossible to grow in the lab”. “Most viruses can be grown in the lab because the cell lines that are grown are ‘permissive’, which means that when a virus gets inside, all the machinery necessary for that cell to make lots of copies of the virus is present,” explains Madonna King, author of Ian Frazer: The Man Who Saved a Million Lives. Undaunted by the challenge, Ian Frazer and the late Jian Zhou, an expert in gene technology, ‘reasoned’ that “If HPV couldn’t be grown … then perhaps they could build their own version of the virus”

So what we have in HPV vaccines is not a real virus but virus-like particles. Seriously what are we really doing injecting these particles into the bodies of teenagers all over the world?

According to investigative journalist and author Janine Roberts:

… these vaccines are the product of a new synthetic vaccine industry based, not on isolating viruses, but on reproducing short lengths of genetic codes postulated to come from proteins that once formed the outer coat of the virus.

Dr Tenpenny’s presentation discusses the toxic contents of Gardasil and Gardasil 9 which include the potent adjuvant amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate, (AAHS), polysorbate 80 and sodium borate as well as the antigens – the virus-like particles.

Rise in infertility
Polysorbate 80 is known to cause infertility on female mice. In the research for my book Gardasil: Fast-Tracked and Flawed I discovered that although mainstream media remains silent about the problems emanating from this vaccination program, some doctors are reporting the adverse effects on young women’s health.

In the BMJ (British Medical Journal) Case Reports authors Deidre Little and Harvey Rodrick Grenville Ward of Australia reported the case of a patient with amenorrhoea who noticed that her usual regular menstrual cycle had changed, becoming irregular and then scant after Gardasil.

The authors explain that it is very rare for the condition known as premature ovarian failure to occur at such an early age and that the annual incidence is 10 per 100,000 between 15 and 29 years of age. Premature ovarian failure is a serious health event for young girls and one that adversely affects their ability to have children.

Dr Little has continued her research into HPV vaccines after having several more patients report to her with what is now called premature ovarian insufficiency. These young women report having infrequent periods which continue to dwindle and finally cease.

Deidre Little is a general practitioner who has reported on seven patients with POF who told her their symptoms came on after their Gardasil vaccination. If there are seven reports from her small town of Bellingen, NSW then we can expect that there are many other girls suffering the same unnecessary, but serious and life-changing condition after their Gardasil shots.

Sodium Borate

Is rat poison. Banned in food but the vaccine industry is allowed to include it in vaccines that are injected into our children.

Aluminium adjuvants

Sherri Tenpenny points to a 1995 animal study which found that aluminium adjuvants lead to low sperm counts and therefore to infertility. The addition of these seriously harmful additives, polysorbate 80, sodium borate and aluminium makes her wonder:

Is this intentionally causing infertility in boys… and girls

This is a powerful presentation by Sherri Tenpenny. My thanks to Courtenay Heading for holding this important seminar.

The Gardasil Vaccine—Bad Science, Great Promotion, Dangerous
9 May, 2018 (https://avn.org.au/2018/05/gardasil-vaccine-bad-science-great-promotion-dangerous/)

rjeCNLw2cX0

Delight

27th May 2019, 04:03

HPV vaccination does not negatively impact fertility in adolescents, large study finds
Date:
August 21, 2018
Source:
Kaiser Permanente (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180821114430.htm)
Summary:
Adolescents who receive recommended vaccinations, including for human papillomavirus, have no increased risk of primary ovarian insufficiency, also known as premature menopause, according to a Kaiser Permanente study published today in Pediatrics.

A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection
Gayle DeLong
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health,
Received 05 Aug 2017, Accepted 14 May 2018
Current Issues (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15287394.2018.1477640?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=uteh20&fbclid=IwAR3IqImbrUnGzw8cwryQk_PsIqbcbRqjYwSDhIUrkpENv-3qnIcYUxCFKkc&)
Published online: 11 Jun 2018
Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2018.1477640

ABSTRACT
Birth rates in the United States have recently fallen. Birth rates per 1000 females aged 25–29 fell from 118 in 2007 to 105 in 2015. One factor may involve the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). Shortly after the vaccine was licensed, several reports of recipients experiencing primary ovarian failure emerged. This study analyzed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which represented 8 million 25-to-29-year-old women residing in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. For married women, 75% who did not receive the shot were found to conceive, while only 50% who received the vaccine had ever been pregnant. Using logistic regression to analyze the data, the probability of having been pregnant was estimated for females who received an HPV vaccine compared with females who did not receive the shot. Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot. If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million. Further study into the influence of HPV vaccine on fertility is thus warranted.

2015 vaccine debate when Hawaii was considering eliminating exemptions

NHPeZ08BW6M

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane
Co-authors and Hosts of the “Hollywood Spin” Series of
Commentaries on RevolutionTelevision.net.
U.S. BIODEFENSE CHIEF AND HAWAII SENATOR CHARGED WITH CONSUMER FRAUD IN PBS VACCINE DEBATE ON “MANDATORY INJECTIONS” FOR ALL “HEALTHY CHILDREN” (https://www.waronwethepeople.com/greatest_vaccine_debate/)

https://www.waronwethepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/PBS-Vaccine-Debate-Banner1.jpg

Honolulu, HI. (Feb. 20, 2015)– PBS Hawaii confused and frightened viewers with a live program debating whether all healthy children must be vaccinated or otherwise quarantined if any outbreak occurs. The INSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII show featured four of the nations leading analysts, two pro, and two con, who debated the controversial matter most candidly.

America’s bio-defense chief, Sarah Park, and Senator Josh Green, Hawaii’s Health Committee chairman, got slammed for consumer fraud and conflicting interests in the genetically-modified vaccine industry; concealing, among other things, Monsanto and parent-company network sponsor Pfizer—a repeat offender fined the largest criminal damage award for fraud in U.S. history.

Vetting the “con,” and the widespread crime, leading anti-vaccinationists, Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Dr. Janet Edghill, disclaimed the program as part of a national campaign to deceive parents into vaccinating children by smearing better-informed resistors, marginalizing them as “crazy” for rejecting the “intoxicating injections” and expressing legitimate religious, philosophical, and medical concerns.

Park and Horowitz on PBSINSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII is a live public affairs show that is also streamed on PBSHawaii.org. The producers and host, however, failed to mention their conflicting sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer, and other vaccine makers,when they promoted the show that stunned viewers, and convinced most critics that vaccination resistors are better informed and certainly more candid for examining the “risk/benefit” science grossly and “criminally neglected” by doctors and pharmacists who are heavily invested in the “intoxicating paradigm” controlled by untrustworthy drug companies.

THE UNNERVING CON
Measles outbreaks allegedly linked to “non-vaccinated children” on the mainland have “many in Hawaii questioning whether our vaccination requirements are strong enough to prevent an outbreak here,” the show’s advertisement read. “Although several vaccinations are required to attend public schools, parents who believe the shots are dangerous or unnecessary can seek exemptions for religious and medical reasons. But now that the nearly eradicated measles virus has returned, should exemptions for healthy children still be allowed?”

That “PBS con” framed the program with vaccine-industry-bias, only recognized by people privy to the tricks of “media persuasion,” as you will learn more as your continue reading. . . .

This article reviews the PBS “program,” pointing out omissions, misrepresentations, diversions, and downright fraud committed on behalf of the network’s concealed “underwriters.”

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is a Harvard-trained filmmaker, public health expert, media intelligence analyst, and award-winning author of seventeen books, including the American best-seller Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? that is credited by health officials internationally as largely responsible for the anti-vaccination movement globally.

Complementing the opposition, Dr. Janet Edghill is a leading vaccine injury researcher and parents-rights activist who spent 28 years as an electrical engineer for the Department of Defense, held positions with the Department of the Navy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the US Pacific Command, before earning three Master’s Degrees. Initially a vaccine-proponent, she witnessed her youngest son, Ryan, becoming severely autistic following a vaccine that redirected her life. “Janet” was forced to pursue a new career into special education for vaccine injured children. She went on to earn her doctorate in this field from the University of Southern California. Since then she has served several non-profit organizations in Hawaii, promoting rights for the disabled, and publishing information to help children with autism on AutismInParadise.com.

malia mattoch2PBS host Malia Mattoch moderated the feud. She began, “While there are currently no measles cases in Hawaii, outbreaks connected to Illinois daycare centers and Disneyland have brought the debate to the forefront. . . . Should Hawaii require vaccinations for all healthy children?”

For the next hour, Horowitz and Edghill pummeled medical doctors Green and Park for their willful blindness to vaccination risk studies, and the “intoxicating paradigm’s propaganda,” despite Mattoch giving Park more than her fair share of time.

PBS’s motivation for heralding the program, “Should Hawaii Require All Children to Be Vaccinated?” is not hard to glean. Their influential sponsors seeks to express their bias by abusing the liberal-leaning “public broadcasting” platform to protect and promote their petrochemical-pharmaceutical interests.

“It’s a cartel,” Dr. Horowitz commented to his partnering journalist, Sherri Kane, after the show. “The mob’s murderous history stretches from Nazi infamy with the IG Farben-Rockefeller Standard Oil Company partnership that directed the holocaust of World War II, and repeatedly experimented on humans, to the more recent environmental and public health disasters profiting special interests that are PBS’s leading sponsors.”

DR. PARK’S PROPAGANDA

Rather than vaccine toxicity popping the question, “When will drug companies stop damaging people and the environment?” the show focused on measles and the question, “Are un-vaccinated children putting vaccinated children at risk?”

Mattoch directed the majority of questions to Park, appointed in 2012 to chair the “National Biodefense Science Board” charged with assessing risks and recommending drug and vaccine stockpiling by the federal government. Alternatively, their propaganda claims to be helping to “prevent, prepare for, and respond to public health emergencies” stemming from bioterrorism and infectious diseases.

“I think, ahmm, they pose quite a significant risk,” Park replied to Mattoch’s question to begin demonizing parents of un-vaccinated children. Her transparent effort to cause people to fear vaccine resistors disturbed many viewers.

“[Un-vaccinated children are a risk], ahmm; not only to themselves, but to the community. Hence, ahmm, you know, should they be opting out of vaccination, we, we, . . . will take the measures to protect them, and those around them, by asking them to excuse themselves from school, ahmm, and from the community in general, during the incubation phase if they’ve been exposed.”

In other words, still reeling from the federal embarrassment over the abysmal bio-response to the recent “Ebola crisis,” or similarly embarrassing inefficacy of the 2014 “flu vaccine,” Park pushed fears and threats to promote quarantining people during pronounced outbreaks, regardless of the different risks that different diseases pose to different people in different parts of the world.

Sandra Park2“Ahmm,” Park continued to defend the drug cartel’s increasing preference for quarantines. “That’s so we can monitor them. They can, you know; and make certain [children] get the perfect care; but also to protect other kids who would be, you know, potentially in danger from, ahhh, getting the [measles] disease. So they [that is, unvaccinated children] pose quite a significant risk.”

THE “SIGNIFICANT RISK”
“The most ‘significant risk’ is to Americans’ ‘life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness’ after vaccine intoxication whack your immune system, health, children, family, and finances, as they did in Dr. Edghill’s case,” Dr. Horowitz commented to Kane after the show.

“Vaccine science is like a new religion,” Kane replied. (Sherri Kane is a journalist, psycho-social analyst, and women, children’s and animal rights activist who works with Dr. Horowitz analyzing media propaganda on their Revolution Television Network, and generating “medicinal music” on 528Records.com and the 528 Radio Network.)

“Most governments and religions use fear to control ‘We The Sheeple.’ Kane continued. ” The media is used to get the ‘herd’ to follow corporate fascist agendas—generating a virtual hypnotic trance state in which alternative views are shunned and ‘radicalizers’ are persecuted. This is how the drug cartel manages populations for profit. And now they are aiming to control your most valuable and sacred personal property—your body, forced into quarantines or injected with God knows what.”

Park’s propaganda was transparently Orwellian. Precisely like Kane’s diagnosis. Dr. Park never answered host Mattoch’s question, but skirted the risk-differential issue without providing any scientific evidence whatsoever.

“There are no studies that have ever been done comparing risks between unvaccinated versus vaccinated children, putting either at more or less risk,” Dr. Horowitz said after the show, applauding Dr. Edghill’s comments (as detailed below). “The main reason is that officials under the influence of Big Pharma’s bribes and academic indoctrination neglect and conceal data on injuries that would condemn the vaccine industry irreparably. So the definitive proof, for either side, doesn’t exist; thanks to the special interest groups neglecting the studies and concealing the evidence. This is why Dr. Park can’t argue, but simply diverts from this point. She too is a victim of medical-scientific evidence tampering; and her ‘paradigm’ is, therefore, fundamentally flawed and untrustworthy.”

Nonetheless, that dearth of data didn’t stop Park’s doublespeak setting the standard for the Green-Park team.

“But, I might also add,” Park rambled, “the risk now is not just from unvaccinated children, but unvaccinated adults, because a number of kids have now grown up. And we are now seeing a sort of changing epidemiology in that we are seeing unvaccinated kids being affected; we’re now seeing the unvaccinated adults, the kids that grew up, and now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii, and spreading it in our communities. Ahmm.”

What did she say? “Unvaccinated adults . . . now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii,” after Mattoch opened the show admitting that no cases of measles have been reported in Hawaii. (Beam us up Scotty, there are no longer intelligent life forms on this planet.)

Park’s propaganda would be laughable, if it wasn’t so severely serious and unsettling. Other than spreading fear for the sake of vaccine sales, and boosting consumer confidence that has been eroded by the abysmal public health failures in 2014, the bio-defense chair’s assertions just don’t make sense without considering the media agenda–to spin the “Disneyland Measles Outbreak” to socially engineer families to feud over compliance with childhood vaccination “requirements,” and at the same time advertise old and new, supposedly ‘improved,’ vaccines.

The disparity is as large as Bill Gates’s infamous admission at a recent Ted Conference. There the world’s leading vaccine supplier lectured on his mission with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. “Television is a good thing,” Gates said, and “vaccines are expected to reduce the world’s population by 15 percent,” so that survivors can all keep watching television.

“Many of these diseases are actually worse, getting them as an adult,” Park continued frightening viewers. “So the fear is, you know, for them, as well, you know; the worry is that, we’ll see, we’ll start to see some complications that are going to occur, are more likely to occur, in adults. That certainly those over 20, are more likely to have, ahh, complications from measles, ahh, virus, than, than, say those between 5 and 20.”

PARK’S APPALLING PRESENTATION OF PROPAGANDA AND “COMPLICATIONS”

“Park’s propaganda is appalling,” Dr. Horowitz commented after the show. “Park demonstrated gross negligence by omitting the fact that vaccines’ purported ‘protection’ wears off after several years. So that, let’s say you get your baby injected with hepatitis B vaccine as officials recommend; it wears off by the time your teenager finishes high school. That’s what many studies are proving.”

For instance, one study published in the Journal of Hepatology in 2007, showed that cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and even ethnicity, terminated the protection allegedly provided initially by intoxicating vaccinations.

Park continued to explain that “complications” could arise from children not getting vaccinated, but incredibly the example she provided was from her clinical practice treating a terminally ill child who HAD BEEN VACCINATED with the measles vaccines, and later developed “complications” from adult-onset measles.

“What percentage of people have vaccine injuries; which don’t always occur [immediately, but over the long term]?” replied Dr. Edghill, challenging Park’s propaganda.

“I agree completely,” concurred Dr. Horowitz. “The number one issue that’s been completely neglected, grossly neglected, and it’s a violation of the public’s faith and trust in the public health department, is the fact that there is no definitive risk/benefit analysis done.

“The cornerstone of public health is to make sure that we’re not killing and maiming more people than we’re helping and saving. The fact is,” the doctor surmised from researching history and the dangers and damages done in the name of “health science,” “without definitive data on knowing how many people are being injured, essentially what you are doing is propagandizing what amounts to the mass killing of people, or maiming of people, for profit for the pharmaceutical industrialists.”

THE POLIO ERADICATION DECEPTION

Senator Green responded very defensively to Horowitz’s medical blasphemy.

“Before vaccinations, polio caused paralysis in vast segments of society and killed people. Before vaccinations, smallpox devastated societies killing millions of people. Before flu vaccinations, we had global pandemics. . . . We could be wiped out if we didn’t have some capacity to immunize ourselves. This has been the greatest public health success that we’ve seen. . . .”

polio
Dr. Edghill rebutted Dr. Green’s statement saying, “The polio vaccine was initially, just ahh [carcinogenic and deadly], there was so much faith placed in it. . . . It was contaminated with simian virus 40, . . . the 40th monkey virus . . .”

“And that’s a hideous story,” Dr. Horowitz interjected. “The reality is, what the Senator just said is really incomplete. And, again, omissions and misrepresentations in law is fraud. So essentially, to say that the polio vaccine caused the disappearance of polio, you have to forget first Salk, and Salk’s vaccines were hideously contaminated with SV40 which caused horrific cancer pandemics. The reality is that the Salk vaccine, replaced by the Sabin vaccine that was not much better because it was still live attenuated virus, and the killed Salk vaccine was never fully killed, because of the SV40—the 40th monkey virus ever discovered [that caused cancer in virtually every animal it was injected into.]

Dr. Horowitz continued: “Two brilliant women [Bernice Eddy and Sarah Stewart] went to the National Institutes of Health Director, Smidell, and said to him . . . ‘We’ve tested the Merck Pharmaceutical [Co.] polio vaccine off the shelf, [and] if you continue to allow these vaccines to go out, I guarantee you over the next twenty-years you will have epidemics of cancer unlike the world has ever seen. That woman [issuing the warning] was Bernice Eddy. And [the virus] was initially called SE [short for Sewart-Eddy] Polyoma Virus; and essentially it took her ten years before she got to the United States Congress, and in an appeal—because she had been demoted, defunded, and ostracized, persecuted; and [then] SE Polyoma was stolen, and renamed. Dr. Hilleman at Merck renamed it the SV 40 virus. Basically, it [the theft of intellectual property] was sexist, it was outrageous, and it was a complete cover-up of what the true reality is with regard to the original polio vaccines.”

“SV40 is today still being isolated in tumors—in cancerous tumors,” Dr. Edghill responded. “There has also been demonstration of vertical transmission between parent to child.”

“That’s right,” Horowitz concurred. “It’s hideous.”continued here (https://www.waronwethepeople.com/greatest_vaccine_debate/)

Patient

27th May 2019, 07:32

onawah

27th May 2019, 16:01

Dr. Andrew Wakefield -from 12/27/18, but worth watching again
The HighWire with Del Bigtree

"HighWire re-airs it’s most important interview to date. Shocking new information, & candid admissions, reveal the real fraud in the case of Andrew Wakefield."
PLjqIL7sdus

onawah

28th May 2019, 18:13

Censorship Is the Last Tool of Tyrants
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 28, 2019
(too many live links to embed here--see the article at)
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/05/28/vaccine-censorship.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20190528Z1&et_cid=DM290835&et_rid=625937582

f3nB4fGljTY

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In 2015, Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 vaccine (which protects against common strains of pneumonia) made more money than either Lipitor or Viagra, two of Pfizer’s top-selling drugs, thanks to the U.S. government recommendation to start using it in seniors over 65
There’s a rapidly progressing effort to vilify and even criminalize those who express concerns about vaccine safety, and to shut down free speech in the U.S. (but only speech relating to vaccine harms, not the alleged benefits of vaccines)
Increasingly tyrannical measures are also being employed, including forcing people to get vaccinated against measles or face significant fines or jail time
Washington state will no longer accept a philosophical exemption from the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine for children seeking to attend daycare or school
Instagram is now blocking vaccine-related hashtags such as #vaccinescauseautism, and any hashtag found to be “spreading misinformation” will be added to an ever-growing list of banned hashtags

The following referenced information contains opinion and perspective on a health topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics that is being discussed in public forums, including in medical, law and other professional journals; newspapers, magazines and other print; broadcast and online media outlets; state legislatures and the U.S. Congress.

Readers are encouraged to go to the websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for the perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for information on vaccine policymaking; to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for information on regulating vaccines for safety and effectiveness; and to National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for information on research and the development of new vaccines.

The World Health Organization has stated that “vaccine hesitancy” is one of the top 10 global public health threats.

Is the vaccine business a profitable industry? You bet!1 Many vaccine pushers like to promote the idea that vaccine profits are slim, hence there's no financial incentive behind the push for vaccinations. Two years ago, the blog Skeptical Raptor, just to point to one example, stated that " … [T]he Big Pharma vaccine profits conspiracy is still one of most amusing myths of the antivaccination world."2

In reality, Pfizer's Prevnar 133 vaccine (which protects against common strains of pneumonia) actually made more money than Lipitor or Viagra in 2015, both Pfizer top-selling drugs,4,5 and the 2018 revenues for Gardasil 9 was $3 billion according to CNBC.6

As noted by Financial Times,7 profits from Prevnar 13 shot up in 2015, reaching $6.25 billion, nearly three times more than Viagra that year, thanks to the U.S. government recommendation to start using it in seniors over 65 and not just children. "The success of Prevnar shows [vaccines] can be as lucrative as any drug," the article states.8

Censorship Aimed at Blocking First-Hand Testimony of Vaccine Harms
When you have a profitable business, you want to nurture and protect it, and promote its sustained growth. That's normal in the world of business. What's not normal is enlisting government to mandate the use of your product while simultaneously preventing the sharing of bad reviews that might impact sales and/or force you to improve the safety or effectiveness of your product.

And that's exactly what's happening in the vaccine industry. In recent months, the push to censor negative press about vaccines has been outright shocking. The "justification" given is that "misinformation" about vaccines is preventing people from making sound medical decisions.

But make no mistake about it; what's really happening here is that Big Pharma and government are blocking parents of vaccine-injured children from sharing their stories and letting the truth be known that there are risks involved. It's really a showdown between a largely pharma-run government and parents of vaccine injured children — not government against creators of fake news.

There's nothing fake about vaccine injuries. There's also nothing fake about data, oftentimes obtained from government documents, that are unfavorable for the vaccine manufacturers. The current censorship is blocking out those real-world stores of injury, and important data demonstrating that government and industry are not telling the whole truth about what is known about vaccines.

‘Vaccine Doubts Spread Like Disease’
Speaking at a recent event at the World Health Organization’s annual assembly, Seth Berkley, CEO of the Global vaccine alliance GAVI, stated that doubts about vaccines spread across social media “at the speed of light,” and that the spread of “misinformation about vaccines,” is “not a freedom of speech issue,” and that “social media firms need to take it offline” because “it kills people.”9

He also stated there’s “a strong scientific consensus about the safety of vaccines,” referring to the spread of negative vaccine information as “a disease.” It’s well worth remembering that GAVIs primary mission is to “shape markets for vaccines and other immunization products.” Clearly that will not be as easy if people understand the risks.

The WHO and U.S. government are founding partners of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided $750 million in seed money to spearhead the creation of GAVI, a public-private partnership and multilateral funding mechanism involving the WHO, governments, the vaccine industry, the World Bank, philanthropic foundations and civil society groups to “improve access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries.”10

Since 2000, GAVI has raised more than $15 billion to vaccinate the world’s children. The single biggest funding source for GAVI is the Gates Foundation, which has donated more than $3 billion, or 20 percent of GAVI’s total income.11

Between 2000 and 2013, only about 10 percent of total funding provided by GAVI ($862 million) was used to actually strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines.12

Shutting Down Vaccine Safety Discussion and Censoring Vaccine Harms
Several of my recent articles have discussed the rapidly progressing effort to vilify (if not outright criminalize) those who express concerns about vaccine safety and to shut down free speech about vaccine harms in the U.S., along with increasingly tyrannical measures, forcing people to get vaccinated or face significant fines or jail time. Here's a summary of some of the most prominent examples:

The World Health Organization lists "vaccine hesitancy" as one of the top 10 global public health threats for 2019.13

In a January interview with CBS News,14 Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) did not tell the truth when he flat-out denied the fact that vaccines can cause injury or death.

The fact is, the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 has paid out $4 billion in awards for vaccine damages and deaths, and that's just 31 percent of all the injury petitions filed.15,16

February 27, 2019, Fauci also did not tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations at its "Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S." hearing.17

In his sworn testimony, he claimed childhood vaccines like the MMR are completely safe and do not cause encephalitis (brain inflammation) before the parents in the audience audibly protested and he was prodded into quickly adding the word "rare."18 The facts are:

a. The MMR vaccine package insert19 published by Merck states that "Encephalitis and encephalopathy have been reported approximately once for every 3 million doses of M-M-R II or measles-mumps- and rubella-containing vaccine."

b. The vaccine information statement (VIS), which doctors by federal law (under the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act) are required to give parents before their children receive a CDC recommended vaccine, states that "severe" adverse effects of the MMR20 and MMRV21 vaccines include "deafness; long-term seizures; coma; lowered consciousness; and brain damage." One of the "moderate" adverse events listed as associated with the MMRV vaccine is encephalitis.

c. Studies have shown the MMR vaccine can cause encephalitis and encephalopathy (acute or chronic brain dysfunction).22

d. As noted in a 2015 paper in the journal Vaccine:23

"We summarize epidemiologic data on deaths following vaccination, including examples where reasonable scientific evidence exists to support that vaccination caused or contributed to deaths.

Rare cases where a known or plausible theoretical risk of death following vaccination exists include anaphylaxis, vaccine-strain systemic infection after administration of live vaccines to severely immunocompromised persons, intussusception after rotavirus vaccine, Guillain-Barré syndrome after inactivated influenza vaccine, fall-related injuries associated with syncope after vaccination, yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease or associated neurologic disease, serious complications from smallpox vaccine including eczema vaccinatum, progressive vaccinia, postvaccinal encephalitis, myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis from oral poliovirus vaccine."

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, also misinformed Congress when she stated, "There are rare instances in children with certain very specific underlying problems with their immune system in whom the vaccine is contraindicated."

She lied when she said the MMR vaccine "does not cause brain swelling and encephalitis" in healthy children, and that parents would know if their child was at risk beforehand, because their child's doctor would tell them if this were the case.24

In February 2019, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb threatened state legislators with federal government intervention if they do not eliminate vaccine exemptions.25,26,27

California state Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, is urging the U.S. Surgeon General to push mandatory vaccinations to the top of the federal public health agenda.28,29 According to Pan, mandating vaccines, as was done for smallpox during the Revolutionary War, would "protect our right as Americans to be free of preventable diseases."

In March 2019, a bill was introduced in Washington, D.C., allowing minor children of any age to get vaccines in the city without a parent's knowledge or consent after a doctor says the child is "mature" enough to make the decision.30

March 27, 2019, Rockland County, New York, barred any infant, child or teen under the age of 18 who is not vaccinated against measles from entering "public places" until the state of emergency is lifted in 30 days or until they get an MMR shot. (A New York Supreme Court judge lifted the state of emergency April 5, saying the number of measles cases did not meet the legal requirement for an emergency order.)

April 9, 2019, health officials ordered residents in four Williamsburg, New York, zip codes — 11205, 11206, 11211, 11249 — to get vaccinated for measles within 48 hours or face a $1,000 fine or six months in jail.

April 25, 2019, Rockland county issued another emergency order that banned anyone with measles or who has come in contact with a measles case from appearing in public for up to 21 days or face a $2,000 per day fine.

"The new order would keep unvaccinated students who don't have medical or religious exemptions in the most affected areas from going to school, and those who have measles or have been exposed to it and are not vaccinated from going to public places, both indoor and outdoor," CBS2 New York reported.31

May 12, 2019, KUTV reported Washington state will no longer accept a philosophical exemption from the MMR vaccine for children seeking to attend daycare or school.32

Tech Platforms Embrace Position as Truth Adjudicators
9DL2HNzjzMc
In recent months, media have also been flooded with reports of how tech platforms and social media are fueling "anti-vax" fears and spreading misinformation, and not doing everything possible to prevent sharing of vaccine safety-related material between users.33

Art Caplan, a bioethics professor and head of the division of medical ethics at New York University School of Medicine, has stated that "companies cannot allow themselves to be 'vehicles for misinformation contagion,'" and must take steps to censor information that might lead people to avoid vaccination.34 In response:

YouTube has demonetized "anti-vaccine" channels, barring them from advertising on the platform.35

Facebook is "hiding" vaccine critical content and barring "ads that contain misinformation about vaccines."36

Pinterest is blocking search terms related to vaccines, as well as "memes and pins from sites promoting anti-vaccine propaganda."37

Amazon has removed films critical of vaccine safety from its Prime Video streaming service, including the award winning 2011 documentary "The Greater Good,"38,39 as well as books discussing vaccine risks and failures and/or biomedical and holistic health treatments for autism.40

Google is burying content and videos relating to vaccine safety issues.41

Instagram is blocking vaccine-related hashtags such as #vaccinescauseautism and any hashtag found to be "spreading misinformation" will be added to an ever-growing list of banned hashtags.42,43

Twitter Joins in Censoring Vaccine Material
To this ever-growing list we can now add Twitter, which on May 10, 2019, announced44 users searching for vaccine-related Tweets will immediately be directed to "a credible public health resource," namely the vaccines.gov website, which is run by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

"Noncredible commentary and information about vaccines" will not be included in auto-suggested queries. Twitter is also planning on expanding this censorship tool to include "other important public health issues …"

And that's the crux of the problem, isn't it? Let's face it, the censorship will not be restricted to vaccine information. There are many toxic but profoundly profitable industries out there, and before you know it, we won't be allowed to read about any number of toxic and dangerous issues.

Can You Get Full Disclosure on Vaccines From a Single Source?
Even if, right now, you think it "might be a good idea" to restrict information about the risks and failures of vaccines, it won't be long before the censorship train stops at your station and suppresses information you are interested in and need to know about to take control of your health. Censorship, which is a threat to freedom of thought, speech and conscience, is always a slippery slope.

If the vaccine thought police prevail today, tomorrow you easily could be prevented from reading or sharing information about another health topic near and dear to your heart — be it pollution, climate change, water fluoridation, toxic cosmetics, dangerous infant products, pesticide-contaminated and GMO-altered food or any number of other contentious issues that can impact an industry's bottom line.

Once censorship takes root as an acceptable norm, there will be no end to it. The fact of the matter is, the federal government's vaccines.gov website does not spell out the whole truth about what is known, scientifically, about vaccines. For example, in a May 16, 2019 post, The Highwire points out the fallacies proclaimed on vaccines.gov with regard to aluminum adjuvants in vaccines,45 and that's just one example of many.

According to the vaccines.gov website, aluminum in vaccines is safe, stating that "For decades, vaccines that include aluminum have been tested for safety — these studies have shown that using aluminum is safe."

In reality, aluminum has been used in vaccines for decades without any safety testing having been done. It has simply been assumed that aluminum was safe, because the addition of aluminum to vaccines provokes a stronger inflammatory response in an effort to create longer lasting artificial immunity.

However, as noted in a 2011 paper in Current Medicinal Chemistry, titled "Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are They Safe?":46

"Experimental research … clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences."

Or how about this 2018 study,47 which found high amounts of aluminum in the brains of autistic patients. According to the authors:

"The aluminium content of brain tissue in autism was consistently high. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively.

These are some of the highest values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded and one has to question why, for example, the aluminium content of the occipital lobe of a 15 year old boy would be 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.?"

This study goes on to note that one known source of aluminum that children would be exposed to is vaccines, and that "their burgeoning use has been directly correlated with increasing prevalence of ASD."

Science Earmarked as False News — Who Are the Science Deniers Now?
GmFX-iQA2nA
Another example of what the government's vaccines.gov website isn't telling you is the documented evidence48 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been sitting on since 1978, showing the MMR vaccine causes gastrointestinal problems and upper respiratory infection in roughly HALF of all children.

This 1978 MMR vaccine's licensing data were recently obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the Informed Consent Action Network.49 These documents raise several other safety questions as well. For example, they show that:

The MMR vaccine was licensed for use in all children based on clinical trials involving a total of 834 children, of which only 342 received the MMR vaccine
Adverse events were only tracked for 42 days following injection
All of the control groups in the eight trials upon which licensing was granted were given another vaccine, in some cases simply another batch or lot of the MMR. None received a real placebo (an inert substance), without which you cannot accurately judge safety, as both the treatment group and the controls will experience side effects. The only thing these studies can tell us is which of two vaccines is better or worse, in terms of short-term side effects
We're Entering an Era of Faith-Based Science
Does the vaccine.gov website tell you this about the MMR? No, it does not. Instead, this very real news, based on official documents from the FDA showing the actual science underpinning the licensing of this vaccine, is now labeled "noncredible vaccine commentary."

The pro-vaccine lobby is very quick to label anyone who questions the safety of vaccines as "anti-science." Yet, what most vaccine safety critics are trying to do is to reveal the science the pro-vaccine lobby doesn't want to share with the public. So, just who are the science deniers?

The pro-vaccine lobby is working hard to get laws passed that will force everyone to use every vaccine the pharmaceutical industry produces and the federal government recommends. If forced vaccination lobbyists get their way, only studies confirming preconceived notions that all vaccines are safe and effective in all instances will be deemed "real science." Everything else is "pseudoscience" or plain "misinformation."

Not only is this censorship trend endangering public health by hiding reality, it's also endangering the very foundation of the field of science by ushering in a highly-radicalized form of faith-based science, where you form an opinion and only allow studies that support that opinion to see the light of day. That's already happening, but we're bound to get much more of it if we continue down this path.

We cannot make sensible decisions about our health and that of our children when all we get is half the story. The video below, "Our Girls Are Not Rumors — Stories of the HPV (Gardasil) Vaccine," is a perfect example of the devastation wrought by incomplete vaccine disclosures. Yet media, largely owned by Big Pharma, tries to write these real-world effects off as nothing but fake news.
In Criminals We Trust?
According to the vaccine lobby, information highlighting the lack of safety is too dangerous to be read. You should just trust the vaccine industry, the makers of these lifesaving marvels.

The problem with that is that most of them have been found guilty in civil courts of engaging in unethical, even criminal, behavior. Why should we trust companies with shoddy ethics that engage in criminal behavior? In my view, this is an unreasonable demand.

Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Baxter International have all graced AllBusiness' Top 100 Corporate Criminals List, along with 13 other drug companies. For example, at the height of the bird flu pandemic of 2009, Baxter "mistakenly" mixed the lethal, live, biological weapon/virus, H5N1, with seasonal flu, then sent it to labs around Europe.

In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, and GlaxoSmithKline was found to have spent 11 years covering up trial data showing Avandia was a risky drug for the heart.

In 2012, Pharmaceutical-technology.com reported50 GlaxoSmithKline was in hot water again after a court in Argentina found the company mismanaged a Synflorix vaccine trial that killed 14 babies. Synflorix is a pediatric vaccine against pneumonia and meningitis, much like Pfizer's blockbuster vaccine Prevnar. According to Pharmaceutical-technology.com:

"The firm was fined $93,000 for failing to obtain parental consent to conduct the trials on 15,000 Argentine babies, and an additional 9,000 babies from Colombia and Panama, between 2007 and 2008.

The children were recruited from poor families. Evidence from Argentina's medical regulator said that, in some cases, GlaxoSmithKline pressured parents and grandparents to sign lengthy consent forms that they couldn't understand … GlaxoSmithKline was also criticised [sic] by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky for keeping inadequate records of the children's ages and medical histories."

Unethical Vaccine Testing Methods Have Been the Norm
yevV_slu7Dw

The sad truth is that GlaxoSmithKline's "mismanagement" was not a one-off event. As reported by Collective-Evolution,51 while under oath, "Dr. Stanley Plotkin, known as one of the fathers of vaccines, reveals … testing vaccines on orphans, colonial ruled populations, babies whose mothers are in prison, and mentally handicapped children." In a letter to the editor of "Ethics on Human Experimentation," Plotkin wrote:

"The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential?"

A short outtake of his testimony covering these specific points is in the video above. The full nine-hour video testimony can be found on Youtube.52 I also suggest reading through "The 6 Top Thugs of the Medical World… As Ranked by 'Top 100 Corporate Criminals List" for a general overview of the companies you're being told to trust blindly and without question.

The Fallacy of Censorship as a Conformity Builder
What we have here is a highly profitable vaccine industry, which has no civil liability for any of the health problems caused by the use of their products, that lobbies government to mandate vaccines, while simultaneously insisting on censoring criticism of vaccine safety and effectiveness, and blocking parents from publicly describing real-life experiences about how their healthy children were injured or died after vaccinations, and refusing to conduct well-designed scientific research that investigates evidence of harm.

The end result cannot be anything other than mounting public distrust, because this simply isn't how honest corporations and industries who conduct business with transparency and integrity go about making a profit. There's no need for censorship when you have nothing to hide and are willing to address shortcomings or product risks to ensure safety and effectiveness.

On top of it all, we now also have an up-cropping of self-appointed arbiters of truth and trustworthiness, such as NewsGuard — a company that right out of the gate failed to adhere to one of its own tenets of trustworthiness: transparency. From the outset, NewsGuard "declined to disclose" the size of its revenue stream in its U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing.53

You can learn more about NewsGuard and its funders in "Beware: New Plan to Censor Health Websites" and "Ghost in the Machine Part 6: Mainstream Media Censors News That Threatens Its Financial Interests."
One of the Most Powerful Videos I've Ever Seen
The following video from Barbara Loe Fisher is one of the most powerful videos that I have ever seen. I am hopeful that watching this video will inspire you to take up the cause and join the fight for vaccine freedom and independence.

There is a cultural war and collusion between many industries and federal regulatory agencies that results in a suppression of the truth about vital important health issues. If this suppression continues we will gradually and progressively erode our private individual rights that our ancestors fought so hard to achieve. Please take a few minutes to watch this video.
xEcYQydhY9E
Protect Your Right To Informed Consent and Defend Vaccine Exemptions
With all the uncertainty surrounding the safety and efficacy of vaccines, it's critical to protect your right to make independent health choices and exercise voluntary informed consent to vaccination. It is urgent that everyone in America stand up and fight to protect and expand vaccine informed consent protections in state public health and employment laws. The best way to do this is to get personally involved with your state legislators and educating the leaders in your community.
See: https://vaccines.mercola.com/

Think Globally, Act Locally.
National vaccine policy recommendations are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being threatened by lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations, and public health officials, who are trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws.

Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state legislators on your smart phone or computer so you can make your voice heard. You will be kept up to date on the latest state bills threatening your vaccine choice rights and get practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community.
Also, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up to date information and call to action items you need at your fingertips. So please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN! https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx

Share Your Story With the Media and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury, or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up. Write a letter to the editor if you have a different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local newspaper. Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only presenting one side of the vaccine story.

I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not back down. Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true about vaccination, will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations funded by drug companies or public health officials promoting forced use of a growing list of vaccines to dominate the conversation about vaccination.

The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead of human beings.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the non-profit charity, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org:

NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims — View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries, and deaths. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here.
If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions — Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries.
Vaccine Freedom Wall — View or post descriptions of harassment and sanctions by doctors, employers, and school and health officials for making independent vaccine choices.
Vaccine Failure Wall — View or post descriptions about vaccines that have failed to work and protect the vaccinated from disease.
Connect With Your Doctor or Find a New One That Will Listen and Care
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and vaccination. However, there is hope.

At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents.

It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.

So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect, and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child

Sources and References
1, 5, 7, 8 Financial Times April 24, 2016
2 Skeptical Raptor November 5, 2017
3 FDA.gov Prevnar 13
4 Axios.com February 5, 2019
6 CNBC May 12, 2019
9 Reuters May 21, 2019
10 Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Gavi’s mission.
11 Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The United States Government and the World Health Organization. May 14, 2018.
12 Martens J, Seitz K. Philanthropic Power and Development: Who Shapes the Agenda?
13 WHO.int Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019
14 CBS News January 30, 2019
15 HRSA.gov, Vaccine Injury Compensation Data
16 U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), Data & Statistics, November 2018 (PDF)
17 U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S.
18, 22, 24 The Vaccine Reaction February 28, 2019
19 MMRII Vaccine Insert
20 CDC.gov Vaccine information statement MMR
21 CDC.gov Vaccine information statement MMRV
23 Vaccine. 2015 Jun 26; 33(29): 3288–3292
25 Axios February 14, 2019
26 THV 11 February 22, 2019
27 Stat News Feb. 28, 2019
28 Richard Pan. Letter to Surgeon General Adams. Feb. 19, 2019.
29 Sacramento Bee February 19, 2019
30 WAMU 9 Mar. 6, 2019
31 CBS2 New York, April 16, 2019
32 KUTV May 12, 2019
33 CNN February 27, 2019
34, 35, 36, 37, 40 Washington Post March 18, 2019
38 Huffington Post March 3, 2019
39 Variety March 1, 2019
41 CBS News March 20, 2019
42 BBC.com May 10, 2019
43 Endgadget May 9, 2019
44 Blog.twitter.com May 10, 2019
45 The Highwire May 16, 2019
46 Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7
47 Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology March 2018; 46: 76-82
48 Icandecide.org Documents obtained via FOIA from FDA
49 PR Newswire May 2, 2019
50 Pharmaceutical-technology.com January 10, 2012
51 Collective Evolution January 2, 2019
52 Youtube Lars P, Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines under oath full 9 hour video
53 United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form D, NewsGuard

Delight

29th May 2019, 02:46

This is

Dr. Christian Bogner, M.D.
Medical Director
Dr. Bogner is continuously striving to bring forth cutting-edge research for effective therapeutic options. Having lectured both nationally and internationally on autism spectrum disorders, Dr. Bogner’s goal is to optimize each affected individual’s path for recovery by integrating the latest research in this field of medicine. His commitment to healing through nutrition is exemplified by his accomplishment receiving his certificate in Plant-Based Nutrition from Cornell University. His primary interests are hyperbaric and phytocannabinoid therapeutics as well as stem cell research.https://oxfordrecoverycenter.com/staff/christian-bogner/

AutismOne Media
Published on May 28, 2019
Identification of key aspects in nutrition, methylation genetics, neurotransmission and the microbiome will allow integration into advancing technologies like hyperbaric oxygen therapy, neurofeedback and phytonutrient intervention. While optimizing brain plasticity with this concept of synergy, a non-traditional, holistic applied behavioral analysis approach is then added for the re-wiring and continuous learning process.

-KBabs-Hews

Cannabinoid Synergy With Hyperbaric Oxygen - Bogner
June 1, 2018
The literature supports various pathophysiologies in individuals affected with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including cerebral hypoperfusion, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and
oxidative stress. It has been hypothesized that children affected with ASD might benefit from Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) owing to the increase in cerebral perfusion occurring during treatment. Various hyperbaric centers have utilized HBOT to treat individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The cell-danger response and endocannabinoid signaling pathways have been described as possible key elements in the pathophysiology of microglia driven
neuroinflammation, with resulting behavioral problems associated with ASD. With the growing body of evidence in the literature that describes beneficial phytocannabinoid effects in patients
affected with ASD, we highlight the principle mechanisms of a novel concept, e.g. phytocannabinoid-hyperbaric-oxygen synergy and its role in paving the way for faster and lasting clinical benefits.

HBOT is approved for several clinical disorders including decompression sickness, gas gangrene, cyanide poisoning and diabetic wounds. Inhalation of above-atmospheric oxygen
might result in an elevation of arterial partial pressure of oxygen, leading to increased oxygen delivery to the brain. HBOT might also have anti-inflammatory properties due to the reduction of
pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor–α, interferon-γ, and interleukins 1 and 6). Furthermore, HBOT might improve mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as up-regulate the
production of antioxidant enzymes. While some studies suggest improved cerebral perfusion, others showed decreased markers of inflammation and did not worsen oxidative stress markers in
children with ASD. In the reviewed studies, HBOT had minimal adverse effects and was well tolerated. Most of the reviewed studies relied on changes in behavioral measurements, which
may lag behind physiological changes. In our protocol, we utilize different ATAs in monoplace chambers for all ASD children.
The molecular collusion of hyperbaric oxygen and phytocannabinoids suggests synergistic properties, aiding in anti-inflammation, detoxification, improved synaptic plasticity and central nervous system homeostasis.

Christian Bogner, MD, FACOG

Pd3Jx4VNFok

slides from presentation Cannabinoid Synergy With Hyperbaric Oxygen - Bogner (https://www.dropbox.com/s/s4562lgk5yawy36/A1%20Final%20-%20Bogner.pdf?dl=0)

Delight

29th May 2019, 03:20

Dr. Rashid Buttar's son was diagnosed with autism after immunizations. He used protocols to detox and his son recovered. He thinks autism is related to an inability to remove heavy metals, especially mercury from the body (http://www.drbuttar.com/patientresources/autism/MultiSystem.pdf) he observes that this genetic issue is also correlated with high synthetic intelligence. He has concluded that there may well be a conspiratorial element to the vaccine program.

RH6_XwDk-fc

83wfuAxtP1c

8sxk8_rwwR8

-y60q95N-DU

h6XDWF4UkUg

onawah

29th May 2019, 21:44

Rubber Stamping—The FDA and Vaccines—Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health: Part IV
MAY 29, 2019
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/rubber-stamping-the-fda-and-vaccines-conflicts-of-interest-undermine-childrens-health-part-iv/?utm_source=mailchimp

"By the Children’s Health Defense Team

[Note: This is Part IV in a series of articles adapted from the second Children’s Health Defense eBook: Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health. The first eBook, The Sickest Generation: The Facts Behind the Children’s Health Crisis and Why It Needs to End, described how children’s health began to worsen dramatically in the late 1980s following fateful changes in the childhood vaccine schedule.]

The vaccine industry has been burgeoning since the late 1980s, when Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) that provided manufacturers with blanket immunity from liability. Two regulatory agencies have played a pivotal role in this vaccine “renaissance”: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Working hand in glove with vaccine companies, these agencies have helped protect and grow the liability-free childhood vaccine market, ensuring billions of dollars in corporate revenues with little need for vaccine makers to even advertise or market their products.

Although credible accusations have surfaced for years—aired by legislators, researchers, watchdog groups and many others—that both the FDA and CDC lack the impartiality required to make accurate judgments about vaccine safety, the two agencies continue with their business-as-usual practices. With vaccine promotion superseding vaccine safety monitoring as organizational goals, conflicts of interest are baked into both agencies’ DNA.

In this article, we examine the FDA’s role in licensing vaccines and ignoring vaccine injuries. The next article (Part V) will describe the crucial part played by the CDC in creating and promoting the bloated childhood vaccine schedule.

… the clinical trials for Merck’s Recombivax hepatitis B vaccine (approved for administration on the first day of life) monitored fewer than 150 infants and children for five days after each dose. Buried in the vaccine’s package insert is the information that autoimmune diseases and an apparent hypersensitivity syndrome…of delayed onset have been reported days to weeks after vaccination.
Speeding vaccines to market
FDA oversight of vaccines—classified as “biological products” rather than drugs—falls under the jurisdiction of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). The FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) handles other drugs and certain over-the-counter products. For both CDER and CBER, “it is the responsibility of the company seeking to market a drug [or biologic] to test it and submit evidence that it is safe and effective.”

Drug and vaccine manufacturers have an obvious interest in painting a rosy picture of their products, but the classification of vaccines as “biologics” allows vaccine makers to speed their products to market with far less onerous safety testing than is required of other new drugs. In fact, vaccine prelicensing studies often feature fatal methodological flaws that make it nearly impossible to identify safety risks.

The majority of prelicensing clinical trials have an absurdly brief period of observation (sometimes as short as a few days or weeks), which makes it impossible to evaluate longer-term outcomes such as autoimmune illness or cancer. For example, the clinical trials for Merck’s Recombivax hepatitis B vaccine (approved for administration on the first day of life) monitored fewer than 150 infants and children for five days after each dose. Buried in the vaccine’s package insert is the information that autoimmune diseases and “an apparent hypersensitivity syndrome…of delayed onset [have] been reported days to weeks after vaccination” [emphasis added].

Placebo-controlled trials are widely recognized as the gold standard for evaluating vaccine safety and efficacy. However, prelicensing studies typically test new vaccines against existing vaccines instead of using true placebos (defined as “an inert substance, such as a saline injection”). This type of vaccine-to-vaccine comparison makes it possible to mask adverse reactions by claiming that there are no differences between groups.

In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, allowing pharmaceutical companies to make payments to the FDA (called “user fees”) in exchange for expedited approval of drugs and biologics, including vaccines.
Captured agency
Captured agencies operate “essentially as…advocate[s] for the industries they regulate,” abrogating their duty to act in the public’s interest. Vaccine and drug fast-tracking provide a clear example of FDA regulatory capture. In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, allowing pharmaceutical companies to make payments to the FDA (called “user fees”) in exchange for expedited approval of drugs and biologics, including vaccines. Additional legislation in 2012 further facilitated “accelerated” approval by allowing the FDA to use surrogate endpoints to evaluate a drug or vaccine rather than waiting to assess longer-term clinical benefits.

According to a 2015 report in Fortune magazine, pharmaceutical companies are more than willing to pay “big bucks” to speed up FDA approval. In the process, they gain extraordinary leverage over regulatory decision-making. Whereas the FDA was publicly funded prior to 1992, the agency now receives 45% of its annual budget from industry. Moreover, in fiscal year 2017, three-fourths (75%) of FDA’s annual budget increase came from user fees, with the pharmaceutical industry in essence paying regulators’ salaries.

Unheeded warnings
In former times, researchers and regulators knew that approval of a vaccine did not preempt the need for ongoing, post-licensure safety monitoring. Indeed, those closest to vaccine development have periodically issued warnings about the need for greater caution and scrutiny. Back in 1961, a leading polio researcher stated in Science that “even after licensing, a new vaccine product must be considered to be on trial” because of the many “new variables” that accompany large-scale vaccine production and rollout. In 1999, the head of CBER’s Viral Products Division contended that advances in vaccine technology were “outpacing researchers’ ability to predict potential vaccine-related adverse events.” Both of these well-founded warnings went largely unheeded.

Nowadays, the FDA (along with the CDC and other government agencies) plays mostly a cheerleader role, assuring residents that the U.S. has “the safest, most effective vaccine supply in history.” The vaccine industry makes similar claims, bragging about the “exhaustive and continuous” safety assessment of vaccines, including post-approval. All of these statements blithely skirt around the fact—attested to by the over $4 billion in payouts from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—that vaccines cause permanent disability and death with some regularity.

It is likely that millions of adverse reactions to vaccines are occurring in the U.S. every year—yet, precisely because these injuries nearly always go unreported, official discussions of vaccine safety remain hugely misleading.
Underreporting of vaccine injury
As part of the NCVIA, legislators gave a nod to the potential for vaccine damage by mandating that the FDA and CDC jointly establish a safety monitoring system to collect and analyze “spontaneous reports of adverse events that occur in persons following vaccination.” That system—the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)—has received nearly 700,000 reports of post-vaccination adverse events since 1990. However, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has estimated that these reports represent only 1% of vaccine injuries. It is likely that millions of adverse reactions to vaccines are occurring in the U.S. every year—yet, precisely because these injuries nearly always go unreported, official discussions of vaccine safety remain hugely misleading.

When it comes to reporting vaccine injuries, physicians are critical intermediaries between patients and vaccine manufacturers. Among the factors that work to prevent doctors from recognizing and reporting adverse events are the lack of medical school training on vaccine adverse reactions and low awareness of VAERS. A large and nationally representative study of health care providers (including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses) found that slightly more than a third (37%) had ever identified a post-vaccination adverse event, but only 17% of that subgroup had ever made a report to VAERS. A qualitative study of health providers in Australia (where vaccine policies are, in key ways, similar to those in the U.S.) found that providers often experienced “confusion” about the types of events that would constitute “reportable” adverse events and also were unclear on how to define “serious” adverse events.

For the sake of America’s children, it is essential to ensure that all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals be free from conflicts of interest.
A “coincidence”??? Puh-leeze!
In discussing VAERS, FDA and CDC researchers like to have it both ways. On the one hand, they praise the reporting system for guiding further safety evaluations, but on the other hand, the agencies warn that “VAERS data interpreted alone or out of context can lead to erroneous conclusions about cause and effect as well as the risk of adverse events occurring following vaccination.” They also take pains to point out that “an adverse health event or health problem that occurs following or during administration of a vaccine…might be caused by a vaccine or might be coincidental and not related to vaccination” [emphasis added]. In fact, government authors who churn out boilerplate articles about vaccine safety exhibit a fondness for the notion that post-vaccination mishaps are simply a fluke. Industry, too, likes to tell the public that it has “guidelines and algorithms” to differentiate between a post-vaccination adverse event that “may” be causally related to a vaccine versus an event that is coincidental to vaccination.

Even when the adverse event in question is a death “temporally associated with vaccination,” government researchers like to rely on the coincidence argument—all the while conceding that “loved ones and others might naturally question whether it was related to vaccination”! This, despite admitting to “rare cases where a known or plausible theoretical risk of death following vaccination exists,” such as cases involving anaphylaxis; vaccine-strain systemic infection (following administration of live vaccines to persons with compromised immune systems); intussusception (after rotavirus vaccine); Guillain-Barré syndrome (after inactivated influenza vaccine); fall-related injuries (associated with post-vaccination fainting); systemic or neurologic disease (following yellow fever vaccination); serious complications such as brain inflammation and heart problems (from smallpox vaccination); and vaccine-associated paralytic polio (from oral polio vaccine).

With the FDA’s disproportionate reliance on user fees to fill out its budget, and silly arguments about “coincidences,” it is difficult to make a convincing case that the agency’s vaccine licensing decisions remain uncontaminated by pharmaceutical industry preferences. For the sake of America’s children, it is essential to ensure that all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals be free from conflicts of interest."

onawah

30th May 2019, 06:05

From InPower Movement ( https://www.inpowermovement.com/ ) :
Dr. Tenpenny and Robert Scott Bell:
"Science Bites will cover a new vaccine every month, presenting thorough information about that vaccine in bite-size increments, hence the name, and in an easy-to-digest sequence so viewers and listeners can quickly learn the most important facts without having to spend endless hours digging around for it in the scientific journals."

Be sure to check out the first episode of this series on Science Bites at :
https://www.brighteon.com/6037837520001
( there is a whole series of talks about vaccines at brighteon.com )

Delight

30th May 2019, 13:15

Concern expressed in 2018 over French legal mandate for vaccination.

"On one side, Professor Luc Montagnier. On the other, Professor Henri Joyeux. The first is a virologist, Nobel Prize in Medicine, member of the Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Medicine. The second, a former professor of oncology, specialist in digestive surgery, is also laureate of the Antoine Lacassagne cancer prize awarded by the National League against Cancer. Two impressive CVs"

APPEAL TO REASON

11 vaccines: Urgent appeal to health professionals and staff
Dear colleagues, dear sisters, dear confreres

The new law, a serious mistake of public health
The new law imposing 11 childhood vaccinations is a serious public health mistake. It has been widely mentioned by the press.

We health professionals, prescribers and / or vaccinators are bound by the law on a path that could turn against some of our own patients, against our profession, and against ourselves.

You will understand why. This Appeal highlights important elements on the subject. Read it carefully before agreeing to sign it.

We are not against vaccines: we are opposed to systematic vaccinations and too many before the age of 2 years.

These practices expose small children to complications because their immune system is not ready to receive so many antigenic aggression.

This is the way to fear:

Sudden deaths of the infant, even if they are rare;
Serious and debilitating chronic autoimmune diseases in the following years, particularly because of the presence of excessive amounts of aluminum adjuvant in the composition of most vaccines;
Risks of particular cancers, bones, muscles, cartilages .. that sarcomas, extremely serious in adolescents and young adults, already detected in animals receiving vaccines with aluminum adjuvant.
You are personally concerned if you are:
General and Specialist Physicians and Surgeons,
Hospital interns whatever the specialties,
Medical students, pharmacy, physiotherapy,
Community or industry pharmacists,
Midwives, Nurses and Other Health Personnel
graduated or in training.
If you belong to the general public, outside health professions, do not hesitate to propose this text to those who treat you. They are more than ever concerned and responsible.

This Call is launched by two medical professors:

Pr Luc Montagnier Pr Henri Joyeux
Professor Luc Montagnier
Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Pr Henri Joyeux
International Cancer Prize for its work in Nutrition

Here is the official list of the first 120 signatories

Dr. Bernard Albouy, Dr. Anne Anthonissen, Dr. Bernard Astruc, Dr. Xavier Aubrun, Dr. Jacqueline BAHU, Dr. Nathalie Barral, Dr. Ann-Marie Bendahan, Dr. Françoise Berthoud - Pediatrician, Dr. Etienne Binet, Dr. Anne Borde, Dr. Anne BORIE, Dr. Anick Bossy, Colette Braud Pharmacist, Dr. Pierre-Eugène de Braucourt, Dr. Gerard Breton, Dr. Carole Bloch, Alexia Boiron Pediatric Nurse, François Cabanis Osteopath, Marie-Martine Chabanne Pharmacist, Dr. Jacques Chevassu, Dr. Christian Carrere, Dr. Jean-Louis Chamblas, Dr. Marie Dominique Chemin, Dr. Gérard Coanon, Dr. Alain Coiffard, Dr. Christian Coulon, Dr. Louis-Marie Coupé, Christine Cuisiniez Pharmacist, Dr. Philippe Dechazournes, Catherine Deglesne Pharmacist, Dr. André Devos, Dr. Drogou Françoise, Dr. Maurice Dubail, Dr. Chantal Duley , Dr. Carole Dupont, Dr. Agnès Dupond, Dr. Eric Dupré, Dr. Caroline Duvert-Gouverneur, Dr. Bénédicte Echard, Dr. Guy Ferré, Dr. Marie Caroline Fleury Munier, Dr. Marie-Dominique Fouqueray, Pr Jean-Bernard Fo urtillan Professor of Therapeutic Chemistry, Dr. Jean Garnier, Chantal Giannoni Early Childhood Educator, Nursery Director, Dr. Alexandre Girard, Dr. Jean-Jacques Grenouillet, Patrick Giusti, Dr. Albert Hache, Dr. Véronique Hajek-Maurer, Dr. Claude HERMANN, Dr. Françoise Hulin, Dr. Alina Ionescu, Dr. Michèle Jeammet, Prof. Henri Joyeux, Dr. Michel Kasbarian, Dr. Ines Kint, Dr. Philippe Koch, Dr. Danielle Kuhn, Dr. Petra Kunze, Dr. Dominique Larroque, Dr. Simone Le Brun, Dr. Véronique Ledieu, Dr. Jérôme Lesage, Dr. Nicole Maguy, Dr. Gérard Malhomme, Dr. Jean-Claude Mamelle, Dr. Martine Masseguin, Dr. Christian Mauroy, Dr. Edith Mebsi, Dr. Mardiros Meguerditchian, Dr. Martine Masseguin, Dr. Bénédicte Mignot, Isabelle Minvielle Pharmacist, Alain Millot Osteopath, Pr Luc Montagnier, Dr. Dominique Mossino, Isabelle Morin Desleau, nursery nurse, nursery director, Dr. Lucie Nicolle, Dr. Jean-Robert Nieddu, Florence Nguyen Pharmacist, Dr. Sambologo Ouedraogo, Dr. Michel Parini, Dr. Jean Marie Pell egrin, Dr. Delphine Perche, Dr. Nicole Perrot, Dr. Marie-Antoinette Piens, Dr. Rodolphe Picquet, Dr. Jean-Pierre Poinsignon, Dr. Jean-Michel Pon, Dr. Françoise Pons, Dr. Dominique Prost, Dr. Denis Pugeaut, Dr. Annabelle Rimalou, Dr. Christelle Rolland Dental Surgery, Dr. Pierre Rouzaud, Dr. Louis Ruhlmann, Dr. Jean-Didier of Saint Florent, Dr. Patrick Salvia, Dr. Marie Schmutz, Dr. Hugues Schwieg, Dr. Jean SENTUCQ-RIGAL, Pierre Sindezingue Pharmacist, Dr. Hervé Staub, Dr. Patrick Stora, Dr. Laurent Subiger, Dr. Jacques Suisse, Dr. Jean Louis Uchan, Dr. Frédéric Vallée Pharmacien, Dr. Ludovic Valsesia, Dr. Jean-Paul Toueille, Dr. Annie Trosler-Vergnet, Dr. Luc Vangermeersch, Dr. Pauline de Vaux, Dr. Noëlle Vescovali, Sébastien Viac Osteopath, Dr. Alain Vitiello, Dr. Fançois Volff, Dr. Agnes Wagner, Dr. Philippe Watine, Dr. Jean Paul Zemb Pediatrician

Here are 3 extremely serious decisions.
- Any child born in France from 1 January 2018 must now receive before his 2 years eleven vaccines, against three previously.

- Unvaccinated children will no longer have access to collective reception facilities as of June 1, 2018.

- Reluctant parents no longer fall under the Public Health Code, but the Criminal Code on child health that provides for a much heavier sentence: two years in prison and 30,000 euros fine.

No specific instructions are given regarding the immune status of children. Nothing is said to promote breastfeeding, - respecting the choice of the mother - yet recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and yet provides the best natural protection [1] . Breastfeeding makes it possible to postpone vaccinations beyond two years, if the parents are in good health.

This sharp increase in the number of compulsory vaccines, and sanctions, is presented by the Minister of Solidarities and Health, Agnès Buzyn, as a way to " restore the confidence of the French " in vaccination.

This is a counter-Sense of Public Health, whose minister - supported in fact by vaccine manufacturers - wants to make families responsible.

However:

Is the process scientific ? Is it medically justified ? Is it finally so democratic ?
Is it respectful of the precautionary principle and French law and international treaties signed by France?
Is it beneficial to the health of the children concerned , and of the general public ??
The device put in place by the law is unfortunately more than doubtful, tainted by vagueness or opacity.

Will families have to ask us, before any vaccination, a certificate of responsibility in case of complications?

For the 11 diseases, the infant will have to receive before his 2 years at least four intramuscular injections, besides the reminders :

- 1 hexavalent injection against Diphtheria-Tetanus-Polio-Pertussis-Haemophilus Inflenzae b and Hepatitis B;

- 1 injection against Measles-Mumps-Rubella (3 attenuated viruses);

- 1 injection against Meningococcus C;

- 1 to 2 injections against Pneumococci: a vaccine against 13 kinds of pneumococci (13-valent vaccine) and a vaccine against 23 kinds of pneumococci (23-valent vaccine).

Why your action is important today
We, Professor Luc Montagnier and Professor Henri Joyeux, are today launching this Call to our confreres and all health personnel in France, because of an even more immediate danger that concerns you personally as a health professional.

As a health professional, you are ultimately the only person responsible for all the acts you do on your patients.

Today, the Minister of Health suggests that the French state will "cover" all cases of accidents or side effects related to vaccines.

However, tomorrow, the new laws on "class actions" led by patient associations, could make you vulnerable to personal prosecution , with potentially dramatic consequences for both your professional and personal life. .

This is all the more true as the manufacturing laboratories have released their responsibility , even though their vaccines have not undergone all the tests that are required for the drugs that must obtain a Marketing Authorization (Marketing Authorization). .

The effects of the eleven vaccines on the immature immune system of children under two years old and from the sixth week of life carry many questions in their own right which Science has not yet answered , especially in the appearance of chronic or autoimmune inflammatory diseases.

It will be very difficult to support the opposite in Justice: several judgments including at European level have already condemned laboratories following diseases related to aluminum such as macrophage myofasciitis but also other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (Hepatitis B vaccine). [2]

Currently, a procedure is under way before the Council of State, at the request of 3055 people to remove the aluminum adjuvant present in the mandatory vaccines and replace it with calcium phosphate. The Minister of Health must respond no later than January 15, 2018 before the Council of State.

The possible negative consequences of the generalized vaccination obligation could expose health professionals to legal actions for the purpose of obtaining damages in the event of an accident . They could be examined tomorrow by the European Court of Human Rights.

That is why we invite you to position yourself officially with us to ask the Government for additional scientific evidence to justify its decision.

This is in no way to oppose the vaccine policy , or encourage any movement of "vaccine resistance", let alone challenge the effectiveness of vaccines to stem infectious diseases. No serious therapist can dispute the effectiveness of vaccination in many cases.

On the other hand, it is a matter of informing the Authorities of our questions , and our serious reservations , because our priority concern is the well-being and health of infants.

Imposing the eleven vaccines does not correspond initially to any public health need.

Contrary to what the authorities claim, there is no drop in "immunization coverage".

To justify its decision, the Minister of Health has, in fact, repeatedly referred to " a vaccine coverage that continues to decline ."

This is incorrect.

Official data from Public Health France indicate the opposite : in 2015, the coverage of 2-year-old children against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, whooping cough, and Haemophilus influenzae b, exceeded 95%, while it fluctuated between 87 and 91% between 2000 and 2013.

Coverage rates for other vaccines [3] were also increasing. The primary vaccination of the infant (3 doses) reached 98% or more for the DTP [4] which is " very high and consistent with public health objectives ", according to the organization.

If the government now makes eleven vaccines compulsory instead of three, it is for a perfectly well-known reason, which belongs to a completely different register than that of pure medicine.

This is to circumvent a DECISION of the Council of State, an administrative and non-medical jurisdiction, which concerned the former Minister of Health.

Indeed, on February 8, 2017, the Council of State, the supreme administrative court, asked the Ministry of Health " within six months, and except that the law evolves by expanding the scope of compulsory vaccinations, to take steps or to call on the competent authorities to make available vaccines corresponding to the only obligations ".

These "only matched" vaccines were the only proven DT-Polio that families are demanding. The petition that one of us launched < http://petition.ipsn.eu/penurie-vaccin-dt-polio/> on this subject was signed by 1,138,888 people without the slightest publicity of the big media, well on the contrary.

But the DT-Polio alone was no longer available in 2008, - by calculation and agreement between manufacturers - and in the scrupulous indifference of the Authorities, who let the stocks run out in pharmacies in 7 years . DTP only existed in combination with other vaccines called a multivalent vaccine.

Why did you choose this path when the law then in force, based on a non-controversial scientific basis, provided for the DTP alone?

In short, the obligation of the eleven vaccines makes it possible to align the legislation on vaccines with the state of fact imposed by the manufacturers , who have made the DTP unaccountable in pharmacy, without taking into account the requirement of the families.

Sign this APPEAL ON REASON to defend the interests of your patients and require the Authorities to debate on serious bases exclusively medical and scientific, outside the manufacturers and their affiliates.

No serious scientific or medical justification for choosing the eleven vaccines
The eleven currently mandatory vaccines were previously recommended by the Authorities on the immunization schedule, based on scientific data that has not been questioned; it's more than a nuance.

However, they do not necessarily correspond to diseases that represent a significant risk for ALL children.

In his July 2017 general policy address, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe cited the 10 deaths caused by measles between 2008 and 2016 to justify the measles vaccine requirement.

However, as responded by the National College of Teaching General Practitioners (CNGE), the majority of people who died had an immunodeficiency that contra-indicated this vaccination . Must we believe that the Prime Minister was not informed of this by his advisers?

Where is the logic ? We doctors, how can we still justify ourselves, remain credible in front of our patients who ask us for explanations ??

And that's not all. Why make vaccination against hepatitis B and meningococcal C mandatory?

- Hepatitis B is a disease that is transmitted only through blood and sexual contact. The vaccine is therefore useful in children whose parents carry the virus. However, there is mandatory screening for the mother at the end of the second trimester of pregnancy.

This vaccine is useless in at least 95% of infants. Why do they run the risk, even very low, adverse effects, if there is no benefit in return?

According to experts, the duration of protection against HBV remains uncertain, it would be long (> 15 years): currently, no recall seems necessary. It is therefore beyond 15 years that should be vaccinated and only those who run risks by their behavior or by their profession.

Finally assert that with the vaccine against hepatitis B, there is no neurological damage before 2 years, does not prejudge a later attack, when we know that there are 25 cases of multiple sclerosis (SEP) more each year (700 children in total in France), starting around 6 years old and in an average age of 11-12 years.

A rigorous epidemiological study is needed to compare MS cases with vaccination against DTP alone, and since the spread of recommended Hexavalent. We are waiting for it.

- C meningococcal infections are at infinitesimal risk in normal times. Vaccination should only be considered if there is a risk of a known outbreak. Apart from this case, in an open letter to MEPs, confreres general practitioners believe that: " universal vaccination against meningococcus C may cause more serious adverse effects in infants than benefits in the general population. [5] " We share their position.

There are currently 27 bacterial diseases, 27 viral diseases, 10 parasitic diseases, 2 mycobacterial diseases. The decision to vaccinate against some, and not others, requires a scientific debate that has not taken place .

There is logic, however, but it is not medical or scientific.

It is an administrative "logic" that suits the authorities, not to mention the pharmaceutical companies.

But this "logic" leads for us, health professionals, significant legal uncertainty. By conforming to it, we put ourselves in opposition with the French law and with the international law as you will verify it !!

Non-compliance of the immunization obligation of French law with international law
In 2005, UNESCO adopted the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights with a consensus of 193 countries including France . It stipulates that any preventive medical intervention must be carried out only with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned and based on sufficient information.

This is obviously not the case of compulsory vaccination that is imposed on parents under the threat of criminal sanctions and discriminatory exclusion of communities (excluding schools and crèches as of June 1, 2018). For example, children who are fragile in chemotherapy, or polyallergic patients who can not, should not be vaccinated, will they be excluded forever from communities? Nothing indicates it.

On the other hand, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights provides in its article 2 that the " only interest of Science or Society should not prevail ". However, the main argument put forward in support of the generalized vaccination obligation is the interest of society, in the name of the protection of persons who can not be vaccinated for medical reasons.

So here we are in the contradiction.

In addition, the new immunization obligation contradicts the law of 4 March 2002 on patients' rights, which states that " no medical act or treatment can be performed without the free and informed consent of the person ".

Finally, the " Principle of Precaution " , present in the French Constitution, is obviously opposed to full-scale experimentation, at the level of the entire population of newborns.

The decision to vaccinate must remain the responsibility of each doctor and each family, without imposing gestures that do not take into account heredity, nor the predispositions of the newborn, nor its living environment and its real risk. of infection for each disease.

This is the information that the doctor must obtain and it is not possible that it happens: we do not vaccinate blind.

This is the norm in most European countries where children are not more infected than in France, while vaccination is not compulsory.

Would it not be wiser for the government to reason in terms of recommendations and not on the obligation-sanctioning mode? Doctors and their patients are not stupid. And it is well known that accountability gives better results than guilt .
Does the Minister of Health really believe that she is going to restore confidence in vaccines by leaving as many worries on the shoulders of parents and health professionals?

No medical consensus or citizen on the eleven compulsory vaccinations
Citizen consultation took place, but, contrary to what the authorities and most of the media say today, this consultation was not in favor of the vaccination obligation.

The Diplomatic World of January 2018 recalls that the president of the citizens' consultation on vaccines, our colleague Alain Fischer, " did not note in his public declaration of interest that he received in 2013 a Sanofi-Institut Pasteur prize of 100,000 €. In addition, the conclusions presented by it did not reflect the consultation on major points. "

Professors Olivier Saint-Lary and Vincent Renard, respectively president and vice-president of the National College of Teaching General Practitioners (CNGE) have strongly reminded him in the "Le Quotidien du Médecin" of November 27, 2017 (page 15) under the title: " Vaccine requirement: the benefit / risk balance seems unfavorable. »:

" If a citizen consultation took place, none of the consultation groups (users and professionals) came out in favor of this obligation. Only the conclusion has proposed it by dispensing with the recommendations of both groups . "

We are therefore facing a democratic retreat. This element could also turn against the decision of the Ministry of Health.

The steering committee of citizen consultation on vaccination has also been denounced as " a real propaganda operation (...) conducted to encourage the French to be vaccinated " by the former Secretary General of the National Health Conference Thomas Dietrich [6] , who denounced the lack of transparency on health issues.

According to the association for independent medical information Formindep, this consultation constitutes " a complete failure " and translates " an alarming picture of our health democracy ".

The question of adjuvants, especially aluminum in vaccines, is not resolved
The antigens present in the vaccines are associated with ADJUVANTS which are not without risks [7] intended to stimulate in a non specific way the immune system of the infant under construction.

The most used in France is aluminum hydroxide

When Minister Agnès Buzyn reassures families by saying that this adjuvant has been used and well tolerated for 90 years, it does not take into account the quantity injected or the side effects, including the increase in allergic reactions. These side effects were previously unregistered and their poisoning abilities lower because previously less aluminum was brought. Not to mention that the recent practice of intramuscular injection of the vaccine makes it more harmful.

In addition, the considerable changes in our environment (chemical pollution of our food by herbicides, endocrine disruptors, and possibly also electromagnetic pollution) could weaken the immune responses to vaccines while promoting the penetration of aluminum into the brain. infants.

When the Minister looks to the big media to frighten families, takes pride in the decisions she makes, denigrates those who - without being against vaccines - but for a vaccination administration adapted to age and sex. Infant state, under the responsibility of the doctor, it does not adopt a responsible attitude.

However, we must not ignore that aluminum was:

- suppressed animal vaccines due to the appearance of sarcomas (very serious cancers), especially in cats, in the vaccination zone, or elsewhere in the bone system, cartilage, muscles.

An Italian study on " Fibrosarcomas of dogs at the injection site of vaccines. Comparison with those of cats ", is very clear, particularly in its introduction:" aluminum deposits were detected in 8 canine fibrosarcomas on the presumed site of the injection as well as in 11 feline post-vaccination fibrosarcomas by the aurintricarboxylic acid method. . [8]

We ask that research in this direction be carried out without delay in young people with sarcomas whatever the location.

- Aluminum has been removed from cosmetics because of its transcutaneous absorption which could increase the risk of breast cancer.

The animals, the beauty products are therefore sanctuarized. But not vaccines for children, while aluminum is directly injected into the muscle, bypassing the protections (intestinal barrier, epidermis).

The 11 mandatory vaccines for infants contain 3.8 mg of aluminum, injected into the muscles, which far exceeds the standards allowed for adults.

Contrary to what is repeated in many uninformed media, and by the minister herself, the toxicity of aluminum in vaccines has been clearly established by the works of Prof. Romain Gherardi [9] which have been the subject of international publications at the highest level.

Similarly, the team of Pr Christophe Exley, specialist in aluminum for 30 years, has recently been able to detect the toxic presence of aluminum in the brains of deceased autistic people. Some were just 14-15 years old. " Aluminum is intracellular. In neurons but especially in cells that are not neuronal. These are pro-inflammatory cells. Cells coming from the body that cross the blood-brain barrier by taking aluminum with them. < Https://www.prevention-sante.eu/actus/aluminium-autism-discovery-pr-christopher-exley

This is the route of administration that is important, because taken digestive aluminum is normally rejected in the waste and therefore safe, which is not comparable to intramuscular injection, as some seek to believe, because then almost all of the vaccine aluminum is captured and retained in the immune system.

Aluminum hydroxide vaccines have the disadvantage of persisting very long (several years) in the body. This biopersistence is responsible for:

- macrophage myofasciitis in the vaccine injection area : on 22 December 2017, a woman received compensation for the development of macrophage myofasciitis after hepatitis B vaccination containing aluminum adjuvants;

- effects in other areas of the body, such as lymphoid organs, brain, bones, kidneys, with long-term effects that should not be hidden from the population.

Risk of sudden infant death following vaccination!
The sum of vaccines, used too early in newborns, can trigger a powerful inflammatory response , by release of special proteins made by an attacked immune system, cytokines [10] , which can cause sudden infant death.

A correlation of temporality is recognized in specific cases.

In the US, in 2017, a publication [11] reports among 20231 cases of complications reported after vaccination against hepatitis B, - 51% concerning children under 2 years -, 197 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), c 'ie, sudden infant deaths. In others of more than one month and less than two years, it is mainly the attacks of the nervous system that are observed.

Long before, a publication of Consumer Health (Volume 22 Issue 4 April, 1999), http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=19990705002005 , by Dr. Viera Schreiber reported 41 cases of children who died in 21 days after the first vaccination injection. More than three-quarters of sudden deaths were correlated with vaccination.

Dr. Schreiber took care to record and analyze respiratory disorders in infants before and after vaccination. She gave her book " Vaccination: The Medical Assault on the Immune System".

In Japan, in 1975, 37 cases of sudden death were reported and related to vaccines. Immunizations before two years of age were then abolished by the Japanese government between 1975 and 1988. Reports of sudden deaths disappeared, until the freedom to vaccinate from 3 months to 48 months resumes, and the rate of sudden death returns on the rise.

In 1982, in Neurology , William C. Torch, pediatrician neurologist, published " Diphteria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: a potential cause of the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)" [12] . Out of 200 randomized cases, he reported 70 cases of sudden infant death, two-thirds of which had been vaccinated during the previous 3 weeks. He also observed an increase in the number of cases, if we take into account a larger delay.

Obviously all these publications were strongly and aggressively attacked . But we can not deny the temporal relationship between early vaccination and sudden death.

So this risk can not be ignored. You must be informed so that you know exactly the possible dangers of these 11 vaccines injected to infants before the age of two.

We consider it essential that this information be brought to your attention.

Indian doctors in 2017, report after hexavalent vaccination, - that which is part of the first 6 of the 11 vaccinations today mandatory -, among the sudden deaths, 93.3% of deaths of infants of less than one year in the 10 first days after vaccination, with concentration for the first 3 days, and 7% within 10 days.

In those over one year of age , 83% of deaths were recorded in the first 10 days and 17% after the 10th day . [13] The publication refers to the confidential report (No. 19) provided to the European authorities (EMA, European Medical Agency) by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) on the subject. Indian colleagues are asking the health authorities in their country to revise their confidence in the claims of the EMA.

That is why it should be the sole responsibility of the physician, and under his responsibility, to prescribe in confidence with the families, such or such vaccination in infants, children or adults, according to their state of health and their needs of protection, according to their environment and their way of life.

For true recognition of complications related to vaccination
The great reluctance of families to compulsory vaccinations is also explained by the fact that the complications related to vaccines, which are more numerous and more serious than those claimed by the health authorities, do not take into account.

The cases of autism, [14] fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, narcolepsy, and other autoimmune diseases attributed by patients to their vaccination remain too numerous [15] to be definitively ruled out.

According to Professor Daniel Floret, President of the Technical Committee on Immunization, " it is generally accepted that 1 to 10% of serious side effects related to drugs are reported to regional pharmacovigilance centers [16] " which means that the overwhelming majority of cases are not analyzed.

In particular, it has not been demonstrated that no link will ever be established with vaccination, especially for cases of cancers observed in children and young people, such as sarcomas, very serious cancers, which have been linked to aluminum in animals in different parts of the body, but remain in children and young people with no known cause (s), apart from major immune depression.

In the face of these very real risks, confidence will only be restored by offering the best vaccines needed , injected separately according to the age of the child, tested as drugs, and which will no longer contain harmful adjuvants .

No to precipitation
So far, the French authorities have turned a deaf ear and do not listen to citizens who express themselves, immediately labeled "conspiracy" and "anti", or health professionals who worry.

Those who dare to take part in the debate are too rare and then too easily accused of being "anti-vaccines". This ostracism is led by all those who want to impose vaccinations in a hurry, without studying in detail the possible consequences.

This does not correspond to our position which is cautious, scientifically and medically sound, and which is in line with the conclusions of many independent laboratory experts.

Today, the government's hasty decision to impose the mandatory eleven vaccines puts the entire medical profession in a more than uncomfortable position.

Before the first consequences of law enforcement occur, we invite you to sign this APPEAL FOR REASON to ask questions and request an open debate on medical and scientific grounds.

We are in a democracy and the strength of the number is essential to make the debate alive and prevent the confinement in a binding, authoritarian, and blind policy, whose collateral damage is known in advance.

Today, we are assured that everything will be fine. The recent cases of the Picks and other drugs, where many practitioners have been implicated, prove that the assurances of the authorities are illusory.

In any case, they are not in conformity with the Hippocratic Oath and the principle of the responsibility of the doctor.

This is why we invite you to sign our Call for Reason, and to transfer this message to all the practitioners around you.

Again, it is not about to oppose the principle of vaccination, but on the contrary to reaffirm against an adventurous policy that can only lead to sowing even more doubt in the minds!

According to the Vaccine Confidence Project, whose results were published on EBioMedicine in September 2016, 41% of French respondents believe that vaccines are not safe, a world record, despite a pro-vaccine propaganda recent intense.

The phenomenon can no longer be ignored. It goes well beyond the circle of anti-vaccine activists, which remains very marginal and to which we too often seek to associate ourselves without any discrimination.

To restore confidence, let us ask the government for dialogue, transparency, a real scientific debate based on medical evidence, for a decision that truly reflects the good of everyone.

In conclusion we ask for a formal and official commitment of the health authorities on the following 5 points
- No compulsory vaccination before the child's two years , unless justified and prescribed by the responsible physician.

- Taking into account the protection by the antibodies of breast milk so that the maximum number of children can benefit from it (and according to the free choice of the mother), as recommended by the WHO, to push back the dates of vaccinations .

- The imperative submission of vaccines to appropriate tests, inspired by those of the drugs to obtain the AMM.

- The removal of vaccinating infants against hepatitis B, useless at the 6 th week of life.

- The development of non-toxic adjuvants in vaccines, such as calcium phosphate which is harmless, with some scientific evidence of the toxicity of aluminum being established.

Only at this price will vaccine confidence be restored in our country.

Feel free to broadcast this CALL REASON to all health personnel among your acquaintances.

They too must be protected to remain at the service of their patients.

With our thanks,

Pr Luc Montagnier
Pr Henri Joyeux

[1] Concentrations of granulocyte colony-stimulation in human milk after in vitro simulations of digestion. DA Calhoun, Lunoe M, Du Du Y, Staba SL, Christensen RD. Pediatr Res 1999; 46 (6): 767-71.

- Breastfeeding Provides passive and active Likely long-lasting immunity. THE Hanson. Ann All Asthma Immunol 1998; 81 (6): 523-33.

[2] Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-621/15, "NW and Others v. Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC and Others", judgment of 21 June 2017.

[3] Pneumococcus, 91%; hepatitis B, 88%; MMR, 78%, meningococcal C, 70%.

[4] http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Maladies-infectieuses/Maladies-a-prevention-vaccinale/Couverture-vaccinale/Donnees/Diphterie-tetanos-polyomyelitis

[5] https://30ansplustard.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/letter-covered-with-the-defences-of-the-new-vaccination-development-development-project/

[6] Thomas Dietrich, " Healthy Democracy, Lost Illusions ", contribution to the report of the General Inspectorate of Social Affairs on the leadership of democracy in health within the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health handed 19 February 2016.

[7] Aluminum in brain tissue in autism - Matthew Mold a , Dorcas Umar b , Andrew King c , Christopher Exley a - Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology - - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb. 2017.11.012

- Non-linear dose-response of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective low dose neurotoxicity - Gu. & all - Toxicology Jan.2017 Vol: 375, Page: 48-57

[8] Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Bozza MA, Mutinelli F. Fibrosarcomas at presumed sites of injection in dogs: characteristics and comparison with non-vaccination site fibrosarcomas and feline post-vaccinal fibrosarcomas . J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Aug; 50 (6): 286-91.

[9] World-class work explained with all the scientific references in his book " Toxic Story " - Ed Actes-Sud 2017.

[10] We speak of " cytokine storm ", a cytokine storm or thunderstorm!

[11] Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2015. - Haber P 1 , Moro PL 2 , Ng C 2 , Lewis PW 2 , Hibbs B 2 , Schillie SF 3 , Nelson NP 3 , Li R 2 , Stewart B 4 , Cano MV 2 . Vaccinated. 2017 Dec 11.pi .: S0264-410X (17) 31722-X. doi: 10.1016 / j.vaccine.2017.11.079. [Epub ahead of print]

[12] American Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr. 25-May 1, 1982. Neurology 32 (4): pt.2).

[13] Infanrix hexa and sudden death: a review of the periodic safety update reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency- Jacob Puliyel, C Sathyamala - Indian Journal of Medical Ethics - DOI: 10.20529 / IJME.2017.079

[14] Aluminum in brain tissue in autism - Christopher Exley, Andrew King, Matthew Mold and Dorcas Umar, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology , vol. 46, Elsevier, Amsterdam, March 2018 (Online since 26 November 2017).

[15] See for example recently in the press: https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/politique-de-sante/il-ny-a-plus-de-solution-a-part-se-shut-off -the law-the-disarray-of-parent-refractory-to-new-vaccines-obligatoires_2536671.html

[16] How to make teaching around the vaccine? ", News and Dossier in Public Health Daniel Floret, No. 71, High Council of Public Health, Paris, June 2010.google translated french to english (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=https://www.11vaccinsobligatoires.com/appel-montagnier-joyeux/script/&prev=search)