Q origins?

[Olam]

I have been researching for a long time now info on Jesus and more specifically the Rex Deus bloodline and the present state of it all.

I'm currently reading " Custodians of Truth" by Tim Wallace-Murphy and Marilyn Hopkins .

I was astonished to come across some info about what they call the "Q" material....

Here are some quotes from the book talking about the origins of the first four canonical gospel used to create the New Testament...

Page 89


" The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are, according to the modern scholarly view, founded ,to a considerable extent, on an earlier lost common source that is known as Q.
There is a startling consensus among scholars regarding Q's content and style that has resulted in the virtual re-creation of the document. Burton L. Mack, Professor of the New Testament studies at the Claremont School of Theology in California writes:
The remarkable thing is that the authors of Q did not think about Jesus as the Messiah or the Christ, nor did they understand his teachings to be an indictment of Judaism."....(edited part of the text as it's long).

goes on:
" Yet the Gospels, largely based on the information from the Q document ,speak of Jesus as a divine figure"

I found this webpage that seems to put the dots together...

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-exist.html

[Praxis]

Semantic Satiation is an interesting phenomenon where you say a word so many times that is starts to lose cohesion in many ways. The phonology of the word starts to sound strange. The semantic properties, especially for lexical items that are in dense in this regard, start to blur. This is a common experience, at least among humans.

Say Scuba to yourself. Then keep saying. Repeat for many times. Notice how the words starts to melt in your mouth and your mind?

This is the satiation.

Yes, Indeed there is something in Christian scholarship called the Q source and the Q Hypthesis AKA the Papias Hypothesis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q%2B/Papias_hypothesis

It is quite interesting actually if you are into early christian beliefs and linguistic analysis. The work on pronoun is actually very interesting and can very much change what are thought as core christian concepts. I am not talking in an Identity politics sort of way, I literally mean the difference between 'a' and 'the' when translating. The choice there makes quite the difference.

Briefly, several gospels share many things in common and others things not. The things they share in common are thought to come from some heretofore unknown source, The Q source.

There are other Q stuff that I found interesting:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_(Star_Trek)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_meter


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_clearance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avenue_Q

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-switching


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892765/
The ability to perturb large ensembles of molecules from equilibrium led to major advances in understanding reaction mechanisms in chemistry and biology. Here, we demonstrate the ability to control, measure, and make use of rapid temperature changes of fluid volumes that are commensurate with the size of single molecules. The method is based on attaching gold nanoparticles to a single nanometer-scale pore formed by a protein ion channel. Visible laser light incident on the nanoparticles causes a rapid and large increase of the adjacent solution temperature, which is estimated from the change in the nanopore ionic conductance. The temperature shift also affects the ability of individual molecules to enter into and interact with the nanopore. This technique could significantly improve sensor systems and force measurements based on single nanopores, thereby enabling a method for single molecule thermodynamics and kinetics.
Keywords: alpha hemolysin, gold nanoparticles, surface plasmon resonance, temperature jump measurements, single molecule

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q%E2%80%93Q_plot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_%28number_format%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixon%27s_Q_test


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Q.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q.E.D.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ship

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Q._Public

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_(1982_film)


That being said, I dont think they connect to the current Q thing. Just adding the satiation

[Ratszinger]

I have been researching for a long time now info on Jesus and more specifically the Rex Deus bloodline and the present state of it all.

I'm currently reading " Custodians of Truth" by Tim Wallace-Murphy and Marilyn Hopkins .

I was astonished to come across some info about what they call the "Q" material....

Here are some quotes from the book talking about the origins of the first four canonical gospel used to create the New Testament...

Page 89


" The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are, according to the modern scholarly view, founded ,to a considerable extent, on an earlier lost common source that is known as Q.
There is a startling consensus among scholars regarding Q's content and style that has resulted in the virtual re-creation of the document. Burton L. Mack, Professor of the New Testament studies at the Claremont School of Theology in California writes:
The remarkable thing is that the authors of Q did not think about Jesus as the Messiah or the Christ, nor did they understand his teachings to be an indictment of Judaism."....(edited part of the text as it's long).

goes on:
" Yet the Gospels, largely based on the information from the Q document ,speak of Jesus as a divine figure"

I found this webpage that seems to put the dots together...

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-exist.html


Q Methodology https://becomingpsychologist.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/q-methodology-not-many-people-know-about-it/

[whenyournex2me]

You all need to spend some time on 4chan... cause thats where Q came from, its not a person or group of people, nor is it what you read it is... its a troll. Nothing more than a troll.