A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

[Flowerpunkchip]

A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7

ZADmzHGfVGQ

SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=32709

So when is the news not the news? When it's simply ignored by the mockingbird media, of course. Join James for today's exploration of yet another tool in the propagandists' toolbox in this week's edition of #PropagandaWatch.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project Summary
This is a study of the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) at 5:20 P.M. on September 11, 2001.
The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
The research team is currently organizing and uploading all of its data into a format that can be readily downloaded and used. We expect to post the data sometime between September 16 and September 30, 2019.
There will be a two-month public comment period from September 3 to November 1, 2019, with the final report will be released later this year. During this period, we welcome any and all members of the public to submit constructive comments intended to further the analyses and presentation of findings contained in the report. Designated reviewers external to UAF and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will also review the report during this period. Commenters are asked to send their comments in an attached PDF or Word document to publiccomment@AE911Truth.org.

[Flowerpunkchip]

I forgot to highlight this....

"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse."

[enigma3]

The simutaneous collapse of all the columns obviously points to the building being pre-wired with explosives. Pre-wired. Hmmm.

[Satori]

I forgot to highlight this....

"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse."

For more information re the science, or not, behind the destruction of WTC 7 and WTC 1 and 2 see:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/the-cause-of-the-destruction-of-the-world-trade-center-buildings-on-september-11-2001-and-the-admissibility-of-expert-testimony-under-the-standards-developed-in-daubert-v-merrell-dow-pharmaceutical/

[ichingcarpenter]

''PULL IT'' : Larry Silverstein

8aNS3aC9EXQ

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-09-05/major-university-study-finds-fire-did-not-bring-down-tower-7-911



Major University Study Finds "Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11"


…
This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.



< more at link, including content related to this other recent thread>

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?108113-NY-Area-Fire-Commissioners-Adopt-9-11-Resolution&p=1307212&viewfull=1#post1307212

[Cardillac]

I just think if one is open to/wants more info on 9/11 one needs to read Dr. Judy Wood's book "Where Did the Towers Go?" not to mention Dr. Joseph P. Farrell's book "Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery"-

both books are truly revealing- the collapse of tower nr. 7 is irrelevant to the demise of the twin towers-

please stay well all-

Larry

[T Smith]

\



Major University Study Finds "Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11"

…



I find it fascinating that we need to commission an official study to determine whether or not a fire fueled by hydrocarbons is sufficient to take down a skyscraper. I am not a scientist, nor a chemist, nor a physicist, but I do know the melting point of steel is 1,500 degrees Celcius. There is no camp fire of which I'm aware that can generate that kind of heat--especially one generated by hydrocarbon explosions a quarter mile away; in my way of thinking, the idea of a spontaneous fire erupting with enough heat to collapse a skyscraper is kind of like the Big Bad Wolf huffing and puffing to blow down a building made of brick.... I didn't believe it when I was three years old, why would I believe it as a critical thinking adult?

Of course I'm open to being ignorant and misinformed in my preconceived ideas of things. But please, give me something founded on sense and reason.

[mgray]

WTC7 did not collapse due to fire: new university report (https://grayseconomy.com/2019/09/07/wtc7-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-new-university-report/)

[shaberon]

It is blatantly obvious that most of the "events of the day" were totally stupid and unrealistic.

The real response that is needed is loads of criminal charges and lawsuits, and, unfortunately, my personal conviction that it was stupid and unrealistic is not something a court can enforce. Maybe a report like this can show that someone perjured themself. Although I get the sense that the only thing that might ever be done are RICO type cases or something similar about the insider trading insurance swindle, not Silverstein's, but about the airiines and security services. Plus the ones against various Saudis.

[Flowerpunkchip]

Ben Swann video
Atv31d1BmLs

"What really happened to World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11th, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District Commissioners’ historic resolution calling for a new investigation, University of Alaska Fairbanks' bombshell multi-year, $300K study of WTC 7 and how it collapsed, and an interview with Richard Gage of AE911 in episode #2 of Truth in Media with Ben Swann. "

[ichingcarpenter]

Meet Lucky Larry.... Mr. Pull it on building 7



https://i.redd.it/gc0ih39pytl31.jpg

[East Sun]

Yah, bastard is right, it's obvious, of course ,

we know that so pull the other one...………...

[mountain_jim]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/008/679/062/original/8de177671b2e1a0f.jpg?1568151545



https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/008/679/083/original/821c0027a0fadc7b.jpeg?1568151603


https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/008/679/081/original/b08066a1c0d830dd.jpeg?1568151603

[Hervé]

...

On the 9/11 False Flag and who did it... excellent condensed summary!


David Icke - "The Trigger" Book Launch Live From Derby (2 hours 31 mn)


SnIZpSE9e0k

https://yt3.ggpht.com/a/AGF-l79NsyxDo0RCO3iqGkpLCujdyKoHdHJ3RHLFcw=s48-c-k-c0xffffffff-no-rj-mo (https://www.youtube.com/user/davidicke) David Icke (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAhmDfQ1LfOYECmNNWgXJ7Q)

LIVE from Derby - the book launch event for David Icke's EXPLOSIVE new book - The Trigger!





https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1790281240/henry-makow_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow) Henry Makow‏ @HenryMakow (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow)

David Icke...on the "Sabbatean-Frank" evildoers who infiltrated everything. It's long but covers nearly everything people need to know. He correctly points out that these bad people are turning the real Hebrews into victims.
PS:


https://yt3.ggpht.com/-STDT5xmMMV4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/JTDE_6TEzKU/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAhmDfQ1LfOYECmNNWgXJ7Q)
David Icke
(https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAhmDfQ1LfOYECmNNWgXJ7Q) 1 day ago (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnIZpSE9e0k&lc=UgzPMFzY8hx-XmrXeTh4AaABAg)

Thanks to everybody who tuned in to the live stream tonight! We apologise for the lack of audio around the 37:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnIZpSE9e0k&t=2220s) mark - this was due to the microphone running out of battery.

[Delight]

Has this been posted?

TdGJQgEMnxI

[mountain_jim]

https://www.ae911truth.org/news/656-wtc-7-not-destroyed-by-fire-concludes-final-university-of-alaska-fairbanks-report



WTC 7 Not Destroyed by Fire, Concludes Final University of Alaska Fairbanks Report

AE911Truth March 25, 2020

The destruction of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, was not a result of fires, according to the much-anticipated final report issued today by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”

< more at link >

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

More:

While Everyone Was Distracted By Covid-19, Final Report By UAF Concluded WTC 7 ‘NOT Destroyed by Fires’


https://cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/WTC-7-678x381.jpg.webp

The final report of a rigorous four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process has concluded that World Trade Center Building 7 could NOT have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the “official” explanation dubiously claims.

According to the highly anticipated final report issued last week by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, the official narrative surrounding the collapse of WTC 7 is simply implausible.

The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the building’s collapse, directly contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building in the history of the world to collapse primarily due to fire.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator.

“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”

The four-year study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.

https://newspunch.com/while-everyone-distracted-covid-19-final-report-uaf-concluded-wtc-7-not-destroyed-fires/

[Corfitz]

https://www.ae911truth.org/news/679-ae911truth-releases-teaser-for-much-anticipated-building-7-documentary?fbclid=IwAR05D3kZdbCJLyfXfTRuk0ii9PEZ9ysmAP2z_uNwzEpfqGoEKbv2uJJ2uDg

[eagle0027]

Shortly after 911..i saw an interview of the building owner who clearly stated that they had..PULLED..building 7.The term used for take down with explosives.So it was obviously pre explosive loaded.
20 yrs later and the bull**** continues with nothing being done about it.
Trump and Juliani both have to know this.

[kfm27917]

interesting approach to solve 911 puzzle

https://www.unz.com/article/the-9-11-double-cross-conspiracy-theory/

warning -long read

[Dennis Leahy]

interesting approach to solve 911 puzzle

https://www.unz.com/article/the-9-11-double-cross-conspiracy-theory/

warning -long read


With the "dancing Israelis" and the "Israeli art students" and Israeli pager company ("Odeom?") warning Israeli/American dual citizens not to go to WTC to work on 9/11, as well as the most obvious conclusion that 9/11's main beneficiary is Israel, it has always been obvious that Israel - through the Mossad - was part of (or possibly even the primary group who authored) the planning and execution and coverup of 9/11.

The article that kfm27917 linked explores the possibility of a MIC/Pentagon/CIA/Deep State 9/11 false flag operation aimed solely at the Pentagon, that was then hijacked by the Mossad into the WTC complex Big Show, to accomplish Mossad agenda. I'd say the plausibility of this is extremely high. No Mossad obvious presence at the Pentagon 9/11 event; lots of Mossad presence at the WTC 9/11 events.

I recommend the article to any and to all 9/11 researchers.

[gord]

Dennis, I have to ask, what would prevent Mossad from being a dual citizen and impersonating essentially anything, say FBI or similar.