PDA

View Full Version : What China Found on the Moon (Richard Hoagland research)



PathWalker
27th November 2019, 23:51
I wish to share this interesting video:
DZkyWMa0fBI

Hoagland share his research and understanding from the Chines public media. He trust it as much as he trust the NASA media.
We witness a global controlled disclosure.

Describing the mission.
Describe the chines myths about the moon
Investigating important pictures.
Investigate Jupiter and Saturn sacred geometry structures. and new revaluations from NASA
China exposing the NASA lies.
Refer to torsion physics and the geometry of the sun
The importance of the landing site geometry
Hidden geopolitical chess game
Analysis hidden technology hints given in pictures
Analysis hinted intelligence messages sent with the pictures
Analysis hidden truth (NASA lies) provided in the pictures
Keneth Johnston whistleblower: Salvaged data from Apollo mission
Assumes alien colonies on the moon
Speculate the hidden mission
Speculate about the recent sun eclipse measurements
Geopolitical blackmail


Hope you enjoy it as much.

East Sun
28th November 2019, 01:59
It looks too unreal at first glance..
I don't believe it is real at second glance.

Where are we in this un=reality?
That is a a very significant question?

Ernie Nemeth
28th November 2019, 15:58
Good old Hoagland, sticking to his guns. Now the evidence is mounting in his favor. What if those rocks really are glass? Still, we need samples brought back to earth for analysis to be sure.

enigma3
28th November 2019, 17:40
Richard Hoagland is one of my favorites. Somewhere on his site is a publicity photo of the Chinese moon expedition where the Chinese describe wanting to further investigate the glass domes on the moon. Fascinating.

Hoagland also points out that NASA has dumbed down the contrast and clarity of most lunar photographs so we cannot see the detail.

Bill Ryan
4th December 2019, 09:47
Just a few footnotes here.


The presentation was made in May 2014. (Not in itself significant! Just info. It's not new.)



At 55:45, Hoagland is excited about a 'pyramid'. (And again at 1:51:00) But he himself says it's 130 feet (42 meters) from the landing. That would make it (the angular pyramid-shaped rock!) maybe 6-8 feet high. There's a good close-up view of it at 1:51:56. It's a ROCK. :)



At 57:15, after using the photoshop 'equalizer', Hoagland focuses on the enhanced background of the night sky. In my strong opinion, we're seeing enhanced starlight, nothing more. In the Apollo images, supplied by Ken Johnston, though (and Hoagland is convinced he's seeing the same thing), what he's discovered, from the Apollo images, was the screen of Stanley Kubrick's front screen projection, containing millions of tiny glass particles.



They're not 'glass domes'. That's a lunatic idea. For a start, anything like that on the scale that Hoagland suggests would generate periodic reflections from the sun that would be really easily visible to anyone, like the sun off a car windshield.



At 1:26:35, Hoagland even refers to the apparent effect of 'little glass beads' in the screen. "It's acting like a beaded screen", he says. This is exactly what Stanley Kubrick used. No front screen projection in the Chinese images — we assume! — but in this case, Hoagland is seeing some other artifact. He's the only researcher who ever talks about this, and, with respect to him, because he has a great deal of well-intentioned integrity, this is his own VERY fixed idea.



The presentation here is over 5 years old, so it'd be interesting to know if Hoagland is still sticking to his guns about the 'glass domes' idea. If anyone has any updates about his current view, I'd be quite interested to know.



Finally, at 1:52:12, Hoagland refers to the total solar eclipse (visible from the moon) on 15 April (2014), and shows an artist's impression. But that's not at all accurate. What he's forgotten is that a solar eclipse, as viewed from the moon, looks very different than it does on Earth — as the Earth is far bigger than the moon, and would totally block out the sun. The two disks aren't the same size, at all. It'd need a little calculation to figure out exactly what it might look like. But while it'd be interesting, for sure, it really might not be all that impressive, and the measurements that would be obtained don't compare to those obtainable from Earth.

amor
5th December 2019, 03:04
Either the original Anunnaki who DROVE the moon into orbit around Earth or some later aliens used the dome to live in and grow plants to forest the Moon. There are TREES on parts of the Moon, so there must be air, water and clouds. There are space ships on the moon and Aliens living inside of what looks on the outside to be rock surfaces. The Nazi's who went to Mars and space had or have a base on the back side of the Moon which some claim is occupied by the Americans. On Jose Escamillas original firm about the Moon, there appear to be Giants as a part of the Alien occupants who occupy inside of the Moon. Why is it that all these "Rovers" seem to have a stiff neck and toy wheels and non-solar generators which expire. Why are they not able to fly? We are being given a six for a nine, as usual.

amor
5th December 2019, 03:08
The Domes on the Moon were probably made of a substance as hard as Diamond. According to the Female Alien Spaceship Captain whose ancient body was found on the moon. It appears there may have been a catastrophic WAR on the Moon a very long time ago. There are extremely long roads and right angles on the Moon, a sure sign of mankind.

Ernie Nemeth
6th December 2019, 01:15
I am skeptical about the giant glass structures too, but every time I watch Hoagland he gets me going again. I want to believe and that makes me biased.

Good points about the Kubrick screen. It does explain a lot and also excuses Hoagland's interpretation. But he does examine shots from the Chinese effort as well, and they also show hints of some sort of structure. It would not surprise me much if in the end it is proven that the moon has been and maybe still is inhabited. It makes one heck of an observation post from where to best surveil the earth, that's for sure...



The enuma elish does claim that the planet Tiamat was lost in a great war. A part of that planet became the Earth. Our moon was one of the moons of the interloper that struck Tiamat, captured in the aftermath of the cataclysm by our planet.