Interdimensional and Extraterrestrial

[Peter UK]

Wikipedia

The interdimensional hypothesis, is an idea advanced by Ufologists such as Jacques Vallée that says UFOs and related events involve visitations from other "realities" or "dimensions" that coexist separately alongside our own. It is not necessarily an alternative to the extraterrestrial hypothesis seeing as the two are not mutually exclusive so both could be true simultaneously.

According to Jacques Vallée, the extraterrestrial hypothesis was the predominant explanation for UFOs decades ago.

It seems to me that this picture has changed significantly with much more usage of the term interdimensional but ET has become such a clichéd legacy that I know I use it when in actual fact I mean interdimensional.

I'd be interested to hear in what circumstances or cited sources you use the term ET and mean specifically that which the term references?

[Rawhide68]

What Jacques Vallée did in his time was to say, parafrasing here ... If UFOs was just down to nuts and bolts, he would be disapointed.

I suggest you look in to Grant Camerons site
He has studied UFOs for over 40 years, and he's conclusions are not nuts and bolts anymore, worth listening to ..

Try find something to listen to at at his site.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2-HvGdV4xou1Q0G1Ks1_NQ

[Sunny-side-up]

What Jacques Vallée did in his time was to say, parafrasing here ... If UFOs was just down to nuts and bolts, he would be disapointed.

So true ;)

The whole subject can't be neatly packaged under one title, there is a vast mix of different phenomenon we are experiencing and more.

[panpsych]

Thank you: it's a fascinating question that the alternative community have attempted to develop sensible nomenclature for over the decades. My personal suspicion is that, using Earth as an infinitesimally small microcosm, the taxonomy of all life in existence will be an impossibly complex task and the language around it will always break down and become unhelpful at certain points. There *are* certain taxanomic distinctions that help in terms of understanding the details of "the big picture": but, in my experience, the most helpful realisations are that the distinctions we expect to hold (i.e. extraterrestrials/human/non-human/non-terrestrial human/interdimensional) fail, which can often expand our own understanding of how we fit into this picture.

[Rawhide68]

Thanks for your thoughts panpysch So whats your point, boiled down?

[panpsych]

I'm broadly agreeing with your earlier point re: J.V and G.C on the problem of defining very narrow baskets to put our bread in, and just offering my way of seeing it.

The interesting paradox in taxanomy is: in trying to develop real precision when we're talking about this subect ("that's an alien/that's an interdimensional/that's an ET") we increase the risk of missing the shape of the woods for staring too hard at a leaf on a particular tree.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

I suspect we all are extensions of Source energy, we all are multidimensional and ETs. Life did not start here. There is an illusion of separation as we observe and learn from all the roles we play.
42966

[DeDukshyn]

An extra terrestrial by definition just means - from "outside earth". An interdimensional would be a being that come from outside our physical plane, aka outside the known electromagnetic frequency range that makes up our ability to perceive with our physical senses.

So an extra terrestrial can also be an interdimensional, and an interdimensional may possibly still be terrestrial, but most likely would count as "extra terrestrial' in nature.

I believe most, if not all of the beings we have historically called "aliens" or "angels" are interdimensional in nature, many having fallen from Grace, in a sense as we have ... I don't believe they evolved on a planet somewhere in the physical plane of existence. I have always though of extra-terrestrials this way ... not new to me.

My 2 cents.

[Axman]

I suspect we all are extensions of Source energy, we all are multidimensional and ETs. Life did not start here. There is an illusion of separation as we observe and learn from all the roles we play.
42966

Ron
This is my thought but said much better than I.
Just thought I would pop in and agree.

The Axman

[Agape]

Notice that having “intradimensional” visitors to human timespace is no way extraordinary. Everybody lives and operates in their own time-space in my opinion:)

Dogs and cats, even viruses. The speed of our neural transmissions briefly defines on how we perceive time and space around us.

We know of more advanced entities appearing to the human world in brief and disappearing to their own time-space.
Sometimes, in their presence, the time and space seem to run differently, slower and faster on the human side.

But from my perspective the term “intradimensional” is too broad and insufficient definition of where we come from and from where everybody has come from,
in their own time-space lapse.



🌟

[Mark Tuahmen]

Peter have you seen? https://etandi.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/interdimensional-and-intradimensional/ Did help me greatly to understand. Maybe extraterrestrial is still true but these beings are also knowing themselves to be more than physical - interdimensional, maybe intradimensional too. Beings who I have seen are ET but more than this I believe. Coming to this dimension but maybe coming from also this dimension in different space and maybe even other dimension but not higher or lower - only different. Human percieve in this dimension but existing in more than.
Mark


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIKI7Kx8cMI&feature=emb_logo

[Sunny-side-up]

Always liked and listened to "Bright Garlic", is he still a member and or changed his name?
Hope he is Ok and well.

My simple take on the subject is something like this:
Thinking of our "windows" as the interface with computers, it's an interface allowing us to communicate and act with computers.
"Time" is a "filling system" for our minds to anchor our selves in the material, our bodies are interfaces.
Then "our material bodies" are the means for our dimensional selves to interface here, in the material.
We are multi dimensional ourselves.

[scotslad]

When "Awake" are we terran, 3 Dimensional and "earthbound" ?

when "Asleep" are we interdimensional and "extraterrestrial" ?

Are we actually awake or asleep?

Perhaps, the real question is - Are we being fooled to remain in one state when we yearn to be in the other?

One thing for sure, right now today, many people are awakening... :)

Question is - Do we simply need to "awaken" to the truth?

[Agape]

Always liked and listened to "Bright Garlic", is he still a member and or changed his name?
Hope he is Ok and well.

My simple take on the subject is something like this:
Thinking of our "windows" as the interface with computers, it's an interface allowing us to communicate and act with computers.
"Time" is a "filling system" for our minds to anchor our selves in the material, our bodies are interfaces.
Then "our material bodies" are the means for our dimensional selves to interface here, in the material.
We are multi dimensional ourselves.


Yes it reminds me of the 11 heads thousand arms Avalokiteshvara portrait, depicting the most resplendent form of the Bodhisatva of Compassion.

There’s whole small story behind the icon. When Lokeshvara was still practising his meditation he became so worried by the sight of sufferings of living beings that his head bursted to thousand pieces :)
So with broken head and great remorse he returned to his teacher said to be Buddha himself who then put his head together by miraculous touch of his heart.

This traditional icon reflects our multidimensionality and manifestation/emanation of the “plasma bubbles” who we are in many dimensions up to the subtlest,
the most advanced bubble of light and causality ..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4seGgSt63jk

💧