Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[Philippe]

Here we go, does Sir John Bell accidentally speak the truth about the Covid vaccines??

"..and don't forget, these vaccines are unlikely to completely STERILIZE the population"


https://twitter.com/Cris_Formage/status/1334423853607526400?s=20

In the comments section you can read this:

This is what Dr Yeadon (ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research) has to say on incoming vaccine:

The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

To sum up - indefinite infertility (sterilisation) in females and high probability of death.

Original source:
https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

[Gwin Ru]

...

... all these coincidences coincidentally screaming to be joined like dots:

SPEAK UP with TANK & LISA 12/4/2020 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXk9bpPzRC0) 1:03:36

Streamed live 5 hours ago

https://yt3.ggpht.com/ytc/AAUvwniwFL2qpgcfKu6Rj9fKH9Vv3XHvxMAYJdJvApebnA=s48-c-k-c0xffffffff-no-rj-mo (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsTzmojEh6B205Iz8XadBLQ) SPEAK Project (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsTzmojEh6B205Iz8XadBLQ)

dXk9bpPzRC0

About SARSCov2, the so called pandemic, tests, Gates, Fauci, CDC, vaccines, etc... a comprehensive summary / SitRep on the state of current affairs.

[ExomatrixTV]

4172792212791568


source (https://www.facebook.com/jiniyas.buddhamitra/videos/4172792212791568)



Just some facts wrapped into some strong language [Claudia Stauber]:

10221510307640055


source (https://www.facebook.com/1022440286/videos/10221510307640055/)

[ExomatrixTV]

Italy Blows the Lid Off Vaccine Scam. Will No Longer Poison Citizens with Globalist Eugenics:

JbTe8zs2XfH2

[kfm27917]

German lawyers initiate class-action Coronavirus litigation
The Backstory

Early on, as Fuellmich started hearing concerns from family and friends in Germany about a new respiratory virus, one particular name kept popping up: professor Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist.

As head of the Institute of Virology at the University of Bonn Medical Centre, Drosten is best known for developing the first diagnostic test for SARS in 2003. He also developed a diagnostic test for the swine flu,6 and in 2009 helped drum up panic with doomsday prophesies about H1N1.

When COVID-19 initially emerged in early 2020, Drosten kept saying there was no cause for concern. Then, seemingly overnight, he changed his tune, "as though someone had given him a signal." All of a sudden, Drosten was saying that this virus was extremely dangerous and that drastic measures to contain it had to be implemented.

Based on whistleblower testimony, the German government relied on the opinion of Drosten alone when deciding on their pandemic response, which included the lockdown of healthy citizens and the suspension of constitutional rights for an indefinite period of time.

read story plus links at
https://www.sott.net/article/445288-German-lawyers-initiate-class-action-Coronavirus-litigation

[ExomatrixTV]

CNN Shows DoD’s Vaccine Cards — For EVERYONE; Why Is It So Hard, Even Now, For Conservatives To Admit It’s A Conspiracy?:

5fca961d65480161768d6834

[One]

MILITARY TRIBUNALS + NUREMBERG TRIALS - TREASON, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, GREAT UPSET NOT GREAT RESESET

O60FDre7oEzf

[pueblo]

I know it's not news but the science is now starting to confirm it....it's a SCAM, the PCR test is only picking up viral fragments and these people who have received "positive tests" are in no way able to shed/transmit the virus...


From the study below...


The results of our review agree with the scoping review by Byrne and colleagues on infectious potential periods 26 and those of the living review by Cevick and colleagues11.

The authors reviewed 79 studies on the dynamics, load and RNA detection for SARS CoV-1, MERS and SARS CoV-2 from symptoms onset. They concluded that although SARS-CoV-2 RNA identification in respiratory (up to 83 days) and stool (35 days) can be prolonged, duration of viable virus is relatively short-lived (up to a maximum of 8 days from symptoms onset).

Those results are consistent with Bullard et al who found no growth in specimens with a cycle threshold greater than 24 [w7] or when symptom onset was greater than 8 days, and Wölfel et al [w23] who reported that virus could not be isolated from specimens taken after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads. The review by Rhee and colleagues reaches conclusion similar to ours.10





ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review

T Jefferson, E A Spencer, J Brassey, C Heneghan
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciaa1764, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1764
Published: 03 December 2020 Article history



Objective
to review the evidence from studies relating SARS-CoV-2 culture with the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and other variables which may influence the interpretation of the test, such as time from symptom onset

Methods
We searched LitCovid, medRxiv, Google Scholar and the WHO Covid-19 database for Covid-19 to 10 September 2020. We included studies attempting to culture or observe SARS-CoV-2 in specimens with RT-PCR positivity. Studies were dual extracted and the data summarised narratively by specimen type. Where necessary we contacted corresponding authors of included papers for additional information. We assessed quality using a modified QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool.

Results
We included 29 studies reporting attempts at culturing, or observing tissue infection by, SARS-CoV-2 in sputum, nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal, urine, stool, blood and environmental specimens. The quality of the studies was moderate with lack of standardised reporting. The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (Ct) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that Ct values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture. Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in Ct. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads. Four studies reported viral culture from stool specimens.

Conclusion
Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential.


https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1764/6018217

Full study at https://watermark.silverchair.com/ciaa1764.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAArcwggKzBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKkM IICoAIBADCCApkGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMk1pEC0slWbwbWtl1AgEQgIICatuIa0QhsrbclpggGPLq3cEk0 CUpZ8Q5UtubRe6C8_11iuaKCc02JRHGPthTZ8LdzcUZnfUzDKpograMWXtD_l8QFsId_BZMnzWLqFv-BaCDmBysTiMkbdCgWoUXrLyO5vHpLuqdFesyktSZpnLpClLzBazISMzqcn9i3ej-E9sJYp-Tzgpr4Yk15LWPc2S5RRAtPyO_kca2dPDUINNnAa5OaArkm675aoY-Tq4OziYsEeptU7j33tH1Y-FLX-kmM3KKQ6W2029EPAc4S_vdpP_LM0bEKRT9zb9g02_IxksiRHhsk5pDjOT4rijaxiQRSRLGXBhSf-Jz8cONIDnb8UcY5vEc8alX1910KZULsgxf5j6xp5YBhZEBVUltavUcAICx6Aoo-uxoeHOtRg3hdF6Ax2Cxz8fIgGThQsmtcPmp_DulWL0x-7V2pWzzD_CARTkoYaP0KvPklSiHIBKPlNoLFBUKxwd1H6q6adm-Nc4CV2vaGX7OdHNYM7Kj9qmhTFmYhoMNDPiuUaqT_OncPsvOES-_N8pgEHLaoorIEvb8jPS4tJ51uRFNIWW5mIfK1G5VODlutAhQz0iHOvB_ZMkyAjWV0Wg_-jRUaNi1iADAhDnrWuFE3cNhtspWlnH-DXHVu6bO427isR-RMifGv4lP0k5-rXRNV8VDL5AaTwexspyI8nlljSlMjEKya96Vn5KX0xY1ZLWZhzJLHXlyB7z_BOWiR3cLtYr6Wa-n7a53acei0AX3jDx-qMRHBeT3wBo419Xw7Ibrh670vrntDsabaZGhByfWWMU5U-GAU3wOHaKka43Pkz9mlw

[norman]

V_TmhJ0LSDs
First COVID-19 vaccines arrive at UK hospitals - jabs to start Tuesday

[greybeard]

UK Column News 7th December 2020


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVU0kslHCCI

[avid]

UK Column News 7th December 2020


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVU0kslHCCI

Untested, obviously trialing it on weak and compromised people who have no say, not even the say of their families, are we transgressing to a Nazi-Mengele situation?
This whole situation must be illegal, will some decent and honest folk in our compromised/blackmailed government step up to the plate and blow this horrendous situation, whilst the sheeple are queuing up to be annihilated? This is surely utter treasonous behaviour complicit by the UK ‘fake’ government, bought and paid for elsewhere. Is there anyone honest and truthful still left out there??? 😡😡😡

[Eva2]

Bad news for Canada. The Pfizer vaccine has arrived and inoculations could begin as early as next week. I heard the people being initially targetted for this are First Nations, Seniors and First Responders:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canada-to-get-first-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-doses-before-end-of-december-1.5220229

[Eric J (Viking)]

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ask-the-experts-covid-19-vaccine-now-banned-on-youtube-and-facebook_qIsNohSIeSgfz2J.html

Viking

[Eva2]

Nurse's speech during protest on COVID in hospitals in Edmonton, Canada:


https://www.facebook.com/100053581202852/videos/185908189871887/

[Eric J (Viking)]

Very informative video about the adverse affects taking the vaccine... input from FDA

http://namastepublishing.co.uk/reports-fda-vaccines-adverse-event-outcomes-cdc-vaxx-cards-covid-plans-and-much-more/

Uhhh….Houston…We’ve Got a Serious Problem Here!
Monday, December 7, 2020 5:02

Source: HighImpactTV

SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
All the links from the video:
Documents/Articles: DOWNLOAD NOW, BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR

– Bayer HIV cases: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bayer-admits-it-paid-millions-in-hiv-infection-cases-just-not-in-english/

– FDA Adverse Event Outcomes (pg 16): https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

– “Shielding Approach”: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html

– Vaxx Cards: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html

– “No quantified v. Isolates: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download (page 42 2nd para; 2nd sentence)

Viking

[greybeard]

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/blog/corman-drosten-external-peer-review-of-the-rtpcr-test/

I would suggest keeping up with this web site.
https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/blog/

Up to date news on the groups legal efforts to overcome the Draconian measures put in place for a virus no worse than seasonal flu.
Chris

[Catseye]

I'm glad this whistleblower in Florida, US hasn't been arrested--YET.. https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-state-police-raid-home-of-rebekah-jones-data-scientist-who-challenged-de-santis-on-coronavirus-statistics-010351103.html

[pueblo]

I think this has maybe been posted before but it really needs a bump...

This is the smoking gun of the Plan/Scamdemic... 97% false positives with the RT PCR test!!!!!

WAKE UP, WORLD!!!!

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.


3. The number of amplification cycles (less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles);

In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97% [reviewed in 3]

Full review report..

https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

* Thanks to Greybeard who has already posted link to this report above.

[Karen (Geophyz)]

Very informative video about the adverse affects taking the vaccine... input from FDA

http://namastepublishing.co.uk/reports-fda-vaccines-adverse-event-outcomes-cdc-vaxx-cards-covid-plans-and-much-more/

Uhhh….Houston…We’ve Got a Serious Problem Here!
Monday, December 7, 2020 5:02

Source: HighImpactTV

SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
All the links from the video:
Documents/Articles: DOWNLOAD NOW, BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR

– Bayer HIV cases: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bayer-ad…

– FDA Adverse Event Outcomes (pg 16): https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/down…

– “Shielding Approach”: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-…

– Vaxx Cards: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-…

– “No quantified v. Isolates: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/down… (page 42 2nd para; 2nd sentence)

Viking


Vaxx Card link has been removed!





Mod note from Bill: No, all the links were broken. The Vaxx card link is still there (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html). I've mended them all in the original post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?p=1395226#post1395226).

[justntime2learn]

Very informative video about the adverse affects taking the vaccine... input from FDA

http://namastepublishing.co.uk/reports-fda-vaccines-adverse-event-outcomes-cdc-vaxx-cards-covid-plans-and-much-more/

Uhhh….Houston…We’ve Got a Serious Problem Here!
Monday, December 7, 2020 5:02

Source: HighImpactTV

SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
All the links from the video:
Documents/Articles: DOWNLOAD NOW, BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR

– Bayer HIV cases: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bayer-ad…

– FDA Adverse Event Outcomes (pg 16): https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/down…

– “Shielding Approach”: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-…

– Vaxx Cards: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-…

– “No quantified v. Isolates: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/down… (page 42 2nd para; 2nd sentence)

Viking




Vaxx Card link has been removed!

None of the provided links worked for me.





Mod note from Bill: All the links were broken. The Vaxx card link is still there (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html). I've mended them all in the original post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?p=1395226#post1395226).

[Bill Ryan]

Many people are rightly pointing to the issue of the amplification (numbers of doubling cycles) used in the PCR test.

Even Alex Jones gets it wrong: he thinks an amplification of 40 is just 10x an amplification of 30. It's not. It means it's been doubled 10 more times, which means a further amplification of 210 = 1024x. There's a thousandfold difference between 40 and 30.

Simplest analogy: it's like looking at your perfectly clean floor with a microscope, seeing a dust particle, and declaring that your house is filthy dirty. :)

Here's Chris Martenson on exactly this problem:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWqNl4UUlH0

[Richter]

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting Presentation - October 22, 2020 (1:40:03)
wVspnL_3Gko

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting Presentation - October 22, 2020
You can download the complete power-point presentation here: https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

[ExomatrixTV]

Dr Roger Hodkinson, 29th November 2020


https://vimeo.com/485062851
Dr Hodkinson is a board certified pathologist in the USA and Canada. He studied at Cambridge University in the UK before emigrating to Canada in 1970. He has held a number of leadership positions in his profession both in his own province of Alberta and nationally. His career has spanned general practice, community hospitals, academia, CEO of a large retail clinical laboratory and various other entrepreneurial activities in private medicine.

Dr Hodkinson has a particular interest in molecular diagnostics – the science of identifying DNA for various cutting edge applications in real world medicine.

He has spent 20+ years in the trenches of public health as an activist tackling head-on the biggest public health crisis of our time before the Covid epidemic, namely the predatory marketing of tobacco and governments reluctance to control it, and for which he was made Citizen of the Year in 1994.

Dr Hodkinson is a passionate admirer of Churchill, and was for a time President of the world’s oldest Sir Winston Spencer Churchill Society.

He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and is happily married to Nicole. They have two children.


source (https://vimeo.com/485062851)

Dr. Roger Hodkinson on how governments responded to CoVID

284868239575668

Dr. Roger Hodkinson offers his informed perspective to Edmonton’s City Council on how governments responded to #CoVID19 (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/covid19?__eep__=6&__cft__[0]=AZU_qmtCp-OlRBjCaDQn_7N1tbpGek8sRFf3t5YPFjb3msJtAOAAxHKquUlu vflUGQBs2nIJxHmtQst66rK-Wkq0mINuCYILdnPQtW-bYXMFlNGGWrFteXMEizmyeGVzqxHsAGt6q0sbt-fufIYqQ6r5). He has called for the end of restrictions, mask use, testing, and social distancing. He agrees it is time we return to normal.

Dr. Roger Hodkinson is a virologist and has held many prestigious positions in medical institutions across Canada. Presently his firm sells COVID tests and has direct knowledge on the lack of effectiveness to diagnose illness.

Full Meeting (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1W0FHuR-Rc)
source (https://www.facebook.com/randy.hillier/videos/284868239575668)

UNREAL! As THOUSANDS Suffer in NY, Gov. Cuomo and Dr. Fauci Laugh it Up on Live TV:

wk-X4aDGH_E

[Eric J (Viking)]

Typical mainstream conditioning...

https://twitter.com/iheartmindy/status/1336486877507932160?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336486877507932160%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rumormillnews.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fforum.cgi%3Fread%3D159993

Viking

[norman]

Shock Survey Results show 90+% against Gov’s COVID/Vax hoax ( UK)

Huge boost for Freedom Fighters as Gov's disinfo offensive flounders

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/shock-survey-results-show-90-against-govs-covid-vax-hoax/

[bojancan]

It is worth reading/listening to the latest article of dr. Mercola regarding COVID hoax.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/09/coronavirus-hoax.aspx

[avid]

Shock Survey Results show 90+% against Gov’s COVID/Vax hoax ( UK)

Huge boost for Freedom Fighters as Gov's disinfo offensive flounders

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/shock-survey-results-show-90-against-govs-covid-vax-hoax/

How many participated in this survey, as if only 10 participated it would be ludicrous?
Data please.

[Gwin Ru]

...

1336267608719581185
(click on picture for larger size)

[greybeard]

UK Column News 9th Dec 2020


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2PIBZ_ugvc

[pueblo]

Finally something I can believe on CNN.


"When shots begin to go into arms of residents, Moore said Americans need to understand that deaths may occur that won't necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.

"We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that's the place where people at the end of their lives reside," Moore said.

"One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes."

https://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_f57704265a0db9708053b6eb5320dd44

[Delight]

Physician cannot understand the failure to repurpose known medications for treatment. Emotional.....

"I CAN'T KEEP DOING THIS": Doctor pleads for review of data during COVID-19 Senate hearing

Tq8SXOBy-4w

[ExomatrixTV]

Dr. Francis Boyle: “Bioweapon” mRNA Vaccines (https://www.infowars.com/posts/dr-francis-boyle-bioweapon-mrna-vaccines-violate-nuremberg-ruling-against-nazi-cruelty/) Violate Nuremberg Ruling Against Nazi Cruelty

[ExomatrixTV]

"I CAN'T KEEP DOING THIS": Doctor pleads for review of data during COVID-19 Senate hearing:
Tq8SXOBy-4w
Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center, delivers passionate testimony during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II."

Watch more: Dr. Pierre Kory talks to NewsNOW after emotional Senate hearing on COVID-19:
fSL7sqOudoE

Governmental Affairs looking into early outpatient COVID-19 treatment

“It will all be needless death from here on out, given that there is a readily available scientific solution to the pandemic," Kory says.

Newswise — WASHINGTON, D.C. — DECEMBER 8, 2020: Appearing as a witness Tuesday morning before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs – which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution” – Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin.

The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a “miracle drug” against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities – the NIH, CDC, and FDA – to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for Covid-19.
“People are dying at unacceptable and untold rates,” Dr. Kory told the Senate panel. “I am a lung and ICU specialist, and all I do right now is take care of COVID-19 patients dying of breathlessness in ICUs. By the time they get to the ICU, it is nearly impossible to save most patients. They simply cannot breathe.”

Although encouraged by the apparent successes of vaccines, Dr. Kory said doctors trying to save lives flooding into ICUs now consider the lack of governmental guidance and research on effective early, at-home preventive treatment unconscionable when hospitals are overflowing with more than 100,000 patients admitted – and record numbers of deaths are reported daily. “Ivermectin and the components in the I-Mask+ Protocol could save hundreds of thousands of people around the globe who do not have to die while they await the widespread distribution of the vaccines,” Dr. Kory told the committee.

Kory said that the amount of evidence the FLCCC Alliance has amassed and compiled into a manuscript far exceeds the level required for a compassionate use authorization as defined by the FDA. “That happened for Remdesivir, a drug with far less supportive evidence and much, much higher cost,” continued Dr. Kory. “Why can’t it happen for Ivermectin given this level of evidence? How many more trials have to be done when our manuscript details results from over 20 studies— with over ten of them randomized controlled trials? We are in a pandemic, we are at war, stop pretending this is peacetime where we are conducting business as usual. The NIH must rapidly review the data and make a recommendation.”

The FLCCC Alliance has been blocked in attempts to disseminate scientific information about Ivermectin on Facebook and other social media with the FLCCC’s pages repeatedly being shut down. Furthermore, after the group’s December 4, 2020 press conference in Houston, no major U.S. media outlets reported the FLCCC’s pleas for help from the federal government to act in order to bring this pandemic to an end. Nor did any representative from the CDC, the NIH or the World Health organization contact them.

“I don’t know how much longer I can do this,” said Kory. “Especially knowing that it will all be needless death from here on out, given there is a readily available solution. A solution that cannot be dismissed or ignored. There is a critical need to inform health care providers in this country and the world. The leadership of ourgovernmental health care agencies has a great responsibility here. All we ask is for the NIH, the CDC, and the FDA to conduct a rapid review of the literature reviewed in this presentation and provide guidance to the country’s health care providers.

“If we do nothing, the present trend will continue. History will judge. The American people will cry for answers or will praise the courage of those elected to represent their interest.”

Electronic Press Kit — https://covid19criticalcare.com/electronic-press-kit-dec4/

The FLCCC Alliance was organized in March, 2020 by a group of highly published, world renowned Critical Care physician/scholars – with the academic support of allied physicians from around the world – to research and develop lifesaving protocols for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in all stages of illness. Their MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol – introduced in March, 2020, has saved tens of thousands of patients who were critically ill with COVID-19. Now, the FLCCC’s new I-Mask+ Prophylaxis and Early At-Home Outpatient Treatment Protocol with Ivermectin has been released – and is a potential solution to the global pandemic.


source (https://www.newswise.com/coronavirus/dr-pierre-kory-president-of-the-flccc-alliance-testifies-before-senate-committee-on-homeland-security-and-governmental-affairs-looking-into-early-outpatient-covid-19-treatment/?article_id=742998)
impressive new press release here (pdf) (https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Alliance-Call-for-Action-News-Release-Press-Conference-Follow-Up.pdf)

[Did You See Them]

What does this have to say of the effect of "social distancing" ?

"Four Lions test Positive for Covid-19"

They must have been flouting, or going to house parties or worse - visiting grandma in the nursing home.

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-four-lions-at-barcelona-zoo-test-positive-for-coronavirus-12155394

[Delight]

Watch more: Dr. Pierre Kory talks to NewsNOW after emotional Senate hearing on COVID-19:
fSL7sqOudoE

kE2EcKm5Uj4

[ExomatrixTV]

mRNA, DNA Modification — What Elon Musk Called “The Hitler Problem”:

5fd11c5736e1a46b3ed994c9


source (https://banned.video/watch?id=5fd11c5736e1a46b3ed994c9)

[onawah]

Emergency COVID-19 Vaccines May Cause Massive Side Effects
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 08, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/08/coronavirus-vaccine-side-effects.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20201208&mid=DM741418&rid=1029785097

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
"Early November 2020, Pfizer announced its vaccine is more than 90% effective. One week later, Moderna — which designed its vaccine candidate in just two days — boasted a 94.5% effectiveness rating
Clinical trial data leave out crucial information, such as the cycle threshold used for the PCR testing, whether “cases” had symptoms or not, and how long the vaccine lasts if protective
None of the COVID-19 trials for which we have data are designed to find out whether the vaccine reduces hospitalization rates or deaths. They only look at whether it reduces symptoms if you do get infected
The estimated number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) for Moderna’s vaccine is 167, meaning 167 people must receive the vaccine in order to prevent one case of COVID-19
The estimated NNTV for Pfizer’s vaccine candidate is 256

With COVID-19 vaccines on the precipice of mass distribution, news media are on fire as they talk about who will get the vaccine first and how it will be distributed. The one thing they aren’t discussing, however, is the definition of “effective” when it comes to these vaccines.

Early November 2020, Pfizer sent the stock market soaring1 when it announced its vaccine is more than 90% effective.2 One week later, Moderna — which designed its vaccine candidate in just two days3 — boasted a 94.5% effectiveness rating.4

However, if you read Pfizer’s and Moderna’s press releases and other clinical trial information, you’ll see that they have left out some really crucial information. For example:5

They don’t say how many cycles they used for the PCR tests they gave to count COVID-19 cases, which is crucial for determining the accuracy of those tests
They don’t say whether the “cases” had symptoms or not
They don’t mention anything about hospitalizations or deaths, meaning there is no indication it prevents either
There is no indication about how long the vaccine lasts if it truly is effective and protective. Some indications suggest you might need to take this vaccine every three to six months in order for it to be effective
Odds Ratios Can Be Misleading
In an article published by the Mises Institute, Dr. Gilbert Berdine, associate professor of medicine at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, writes:6

“The Pfizer study had 43,538 participants and was analyzed after 164 cases. So, roughly 150 out 21,750 participants (less than 0.7%) became PCR positive in the control group and about one-tenth that number in the vaccine group became PCR positive.

The Moderna trial had 30,000 participants. There were 95 ‘cases’ in the 15,000 control participants (about 0.6%) and five ‘cases’ in the 15,000 vaccine participants (about one-twentieth of 0.6%). The ‘efficacy’ figures quoted in these announcements are odds ratios …

When the risks of an event are small, odds ratios can be misleading about absolute risk. A more meaningful measure of efficacy would be the number [needed] to vaccinate to prevent one hospitalization or one death. Those numbers are not available.

An estimate of the number [needed] to treat from the Moderna trial to prevent a single ‘case’ would be 15,000 vaccinations to prevent 90 ‘cases’ or 167 vaccinations per ‘case’ prevented, which does not sound nearly as good as 94.5% effective.”

Pfizer’s Number Needed to Vaccinate = 256
In a letter to the editor, Dr. Allan Cunningham, a retired pediatrician in New York, also points out that Pfizer’s 90% effectiveness rating fails to tell the story in a way that people can understand, and goes on to estimate the number needed to vaccinate for Pfizer’s vaccine. He writes:7

“Specific data are not given but it is easy enough to approximate the numbers involved, based on the 94 cases in a trial that has enrolled about 40,000 subjects: 8 cases in a vaccine group of 20,000 and 86 cases in a placebo group of 20,000.

This yields a COVID-19 attack rate of 0.0004 in the vaccine group and 0.0043 in the placebo group. Relative risk (RR) for vaccination = 0.093, which translates into a ‘vaccine effectiveness’ of 90.7% [100(1-0.093)]. This sounds impressive, but the absolute risk reduction for an individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004=0.0039).

The Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039), which means that to prevent just one COVID-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects, whatever they may be and whenever we learn about them.”

Major Safety Questions Still Remain
Indeed, when it comes to safety, it’s important to realize that since only a few thousand verified healthy volunteers have been exposed to the actual vaccine, the real beta testers will be the masses of people who line up first to take the vaccines when they come to market.

In his article, Berdine stresses he has yet to find a medical colleague who is willing to be among the first to take the experimental vaccine. Most say they want to review the safety data after a year or so of use before they’ll consider getting it.

“These colleagues are concerned about possible autoimmune side effects that may not appear for months after vaccination,” Berdine writes. It’s worth noting that none of the trials currently underway include immunocompromised volunteers, so the effects of these vaccines on people with suppressed immune function is wholly unknown.

This is a significant problem, seeing how an estimated 14.7 million to 23.5 million Americans suffer from some form of autoimmune disease,8 and these people are also at increased risk for COVID-19 complications and death.

If the vaccine exacerbates autoimmune problems, the outcome could be devastating for an extraordinary number of people. The volunteers currently enrolled in trials are all healthier than the average American, yet side effects appear commonplace even among this “elite” group.

What You Can Expect From the COVID-19 Vaccine
An October 20, 2020, article9 in the Observer lists the known side effects that have emerged in the various trials. Chills, fever, body aches and headache are the most commonplace, but at least two cases of transverse myelitis — inflammation of the spinal cord — have also occurred.

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the vaccine’s side effects are “no walk in the park,”10 and Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health, has stressed the need for a broad-based outreach campaign to discuss the reality of side effects, as patients might not come back for the required second dose if the side effects take them by surprise.11

Dr. Eli Perencevich, a professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Iowa Health Care, has suggested essential workers should be granted three days of paid leave after they’re vaccinated, as many will feel too sick to work.12

A December 1, 2020, CNBC article,13 which looked at the frequency of adverse reactions, noted that 10% to 15% of participants in the Pfizer and Moderna trials reported “significantly noticeable” side effects.

Buried way down at the bottom of the article is a suggestion from a past advisory committee member, who proposes the nomenclature of “serious adverse reaction” be changed to "immune response," so they can reprogram how people think about these side effects, even if they end up having to stay home from work because of them.

The article also admits they have no idea what, if any, long-term reactions there might be, which means (as we already knew) that this is a great big public health experiment and, of course, anything that happens post-marketing will be labeled a "coincidence."

In related news, a participant in India’s AstraZeneca trial is now suing the company claiming the vaccine caused “serious neurological damage,”14 and a group of researchers warn the COVID-19 vaccines could potentially increase your risk of HIV infection.15 Then there are the concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine permanently altering your DNA, effectively turning you into a transhuman.16 As you can see, there’s a lot to consider before taking this vaccine.

Do We Really Need a COVID-19 Vaccine?
Berdine also points out that most of his colleagues believe “the uncertainties about safety exceed what they perceive to be a small benefit.”17 Indeed, at this point, a range of data suggest the COVID-19 vaccine may be completely unnecessary. For example:

•COVID-19 mortality is extremely low outside of nursing homes — 99.7% of people recover from COVID-19.18 If you’re under 60 years of age, your chance of dying from seasonal influenza is greater than your chance of dying from COVID-19.19

•Data clearly show that COVID-19 has not resulted in excess mortality, meaning the same number of people who die in any given year, on average, have died in this year of the pandemic.20,21 This is true even among the elderly, as evidenced in a Johns Hopkins University article published just before Thanksgiving. According to the article:22

“The deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.”

As soon as the article started trending on Twitter, Johns Hopkins deleted it saying it “was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic.”23

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/public/2020/December/percentage-of-total-deaths-per-age-category.jpg

Studies24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31 suggest immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection is more widespread than suspected, thanks to cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses that cause the common cold.

•Asymptomatic people are highly unlikely to spread SARS-CoV-2 — A study32 looking at PCR test data from nearly 10 million residents in Wuhan city found that not a single one of those who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual (someone who tested positive but had no symptoms) had been infected with the virus. In all instances, virus cultures from people who tested positive but had no symptoms also came up negative for live virus.

Will COVID-19 Vaccine Save Lives?
Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, also questions the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines, pointing out that current trials are not designed to tell us whether the vaccines will actually save lives. And, if they don’t, are they really worth the risks involved? Doshi writes:33

“What will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared ‘effective’? To the public this seems fairly obvious. ‘The primary goal of a COVID-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,’ a National Public Radio broadcast said bluntly …

Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either. None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”

Doshi points out that when Dr. Paul Offit was asked in an interview whether a recorded “event” in these trials meant moderate to severe illness, he replied yes, “that’s right.” But that’s not, in fact, correct. All Phase 3 trials count mild symptoms, such as a cough, as a “COVID-19 event,” and all will finalize their analyses after a mere 150 or 160 of the volunteers develop symptomatic COVID-19 — regardless of severity.

“Part of the reason may be numbers. Severe illness requiring hospital admission, which happens in only a small fraction of symptomatic COVID-19 cases, would be unlikely to occur in significant numbers in trials.

Data published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in late April reported a symptomatic case hospitalization ratio of 3.4% overall, varying from 1.7% in 0-49 year olds and 4.5% in 50-64 year olds to 7.4% in those 65 and over.

Because most people with symptomatic COVID-19 experience only mild symptoms even trials involving 30,000 or more patients would turn up relatively few cases of severe disease,” Doshi writes.34

“Hospital admissions and deaths from COVID-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30,000 people.”

These trials also do not tell us anything about the vaccine’s ability to prevent transmission, as this would require testing volunteers twice a week for long periods of time — a strategy that is “operationally untenable,” according to Tal Zaks, chief medical officer at Moderna.35

COVID-19 Vaccine Poses Rare Distribution Challenges
Questions have also been raised about the potential for the COVID-19 vaccines to “go bad” due to improper storage. Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has to be stored at an unheard of cold temperature even for Antarctica — minus 70 degrees Celsius, or 94 degrees below zero, Fahrenheit. Moderna’s can be kept a bit warmer, at “just” minus 20 degrees C, or 4 below zero F. Both pose a problem for providers who will be administering the shots.

To get an idea of why the vaccines have to be frozen, NPR compares them to chocolates that melt easily.36 The reason the vaccines are so fragile is because they’re made with messenger RNA (mRNA), which turn your own cells into little factories that produce SARS-CoV-2 protein that in turn trigger antibody production.

The problem is that mRNA is easily broken down, so it needs the freezing temperatures to keep stable. Pfizer said its special packaging keeps the vaccines frozen with the help of dry ice. Even so, providers will still have to abide by strict guidelines, one of which says the freezer compartment storing the vaccines cannot be opened more than twice a day, and when opened, must be closed within one minute. Once thawed, the vaccine can be kept refrigerated for five days.

The whole situation makes distribution a challenge, too since the smallest amount you can order is 975 doses. That means the vaccines most likely will have to go to places capable of administering large numbers of vaccines in a short period of time to avoid spoilage. What happens if the vaccine is mishandled and spoils? No one knows. At best, it may be ineffective. At worst, it may cause completely unexpected side effects.

The Gold Rush of Vaccines and Indemnity
kB0MEjHgkfM
The risk of side effects is particularly troubling in light of the fact that vaccine manufacturers are indemnified against any harm that occurs from the use of their vaccines. In the video above, Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., highlights the gold rush that occurred for pharmaceutical companies when the World Health Organization declared swine flu a pandemic in 2009.

In 2011, the swine flu vaccine Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy.
Several experimental vaccines were hastily rushed to market following the WHO’s pandemic declaration, one of which resulted in thousands of European children and teens developing chronic narcolepsy and cataplexy (the sudden collapse due to loss of voluntary muscle control triggered by strong emotions or laughter).

In 2011, the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked37 to childhood narcolepsy, which had abruptly skyrocketed in several countries.38,39 Children and teens in Finland,40 the U.K.41 and Sweden42 were among the hardest hit.

Further analyses also discerned a rise in narcolepsy among adults who received the vaccine, although the link wasn’t as obvious as that in children and adolescents.43

A 2019 study44 reported finding a “novel association between Pandemrix-associated narcolepsy and the non-coding RNA gene GDNF-AS1” — a gene thought to regulate the production of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor or GDNF, a protein that plays an important role in neuronal survival.

They also confirmed a strong association between vaccine-induced narcolepsy and a certain haplotype, suggesting “variation in genes related to immunity and neuronal survival may interact to increase the susceptibility to Pandemrix-induced narcolepsy in certain individuals.”

Now, in the midst of another controversial pandemic, we’re facing an eerily similar playbook — with pharmaceutical companies eager to cash in on the first COVID-19 vaccine, which begs the question, “Are we are being played — again?”

Not the First Hoax — Practice Makes Perfect
Pandemics have come and gone around the globe for centuries, but in recent history they’ve been used as points of manipulation that have profited corporations, particularly pharmaceutical companies.

The 2005 bird flu epidemic, for example, was predicted to kill from 2 million to 150 million people. It killed just 98 people, globally, in 2005, 115 in 2006 and 86 in 2007.45 No one in the U.S. died from this infection. The brazenness of the hoax prompted me to write my New York Times best seller book “The Great Bird Flu Hoax.”

In 2006, 2007 and again in 2008, hyped warnings over the bird flu were repeatedly exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear and line the pocketbooks of industry and various vested individuals. In 2009, there was the swine flu hoax, the vaccination campaign for which, as mentioned, turned into a disaster.

The summer of 2012 was again filled with dire predictions of bird flu sufficiently mutating to cause a human pandemic, immediately followed by urgent calls for fast-tracked vaccines. None of these pandemics ever turned into global killers, and COVID-19 is no different. As mentioned earlier, there’s no evidence of excess deaths due to this novel virus.

The COVID-19 pandemic differs from previous ones, however, in that it’s being used not just to enrich drug companies and justify the existence of gain-of-function research, but also to usher in a “reset” of the entire global economy by the technocrats. While failing economies around the world are blamed on the pandemic, the central bank system has been faltering for some time and is now on its last leg.

The global debt load is now so high, countries cannot even pay off the interest, and thus the system no longer works. It needs to be “reset,” but rather than ditching the central bank system and resetting it to something stable (such as returning to a gold-backed system), the technocrats in charge are ushering in an all-digital centralized currency that will give them total control over the finances of every human on earth.

What’s more, the economic reset is only one part of this all-encompassing totalitarian takeover. The COVID-19 vaccine fits into the scheme by providing an excuse to track and trace everyone’s whereabouts, and connect this medical surveillance together with the digital economy. You can learn more about this in “What You Need to Know About the Great Reset.”

No Accountability for Vaccine Harms
As noted by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), based on the historical failures of past coronavirus vaccines, a fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine could become one of the biggest public health disasters in history.

And, no one involved will be held accountable or face any repercussions, just as GlaxoSmithKline was not held accountable for the narcolepsy cases caused by Pandemrix. Instead, they will all continue to profit while an unsuspecting public will beta test yet another potentially dangerous vaccine.

Even if severe side effects are rare, when you’re talking about vaccinating some 7 billion people, even a tiny percentage will translate into millions of people affected."
Sources and References
1 Axios November 9, 2020
2 NPR November 9, 2020
3 Business Insider November 26, 2020
4 NPR November 16, 2020
5, 6, 17 Mises Institute November 24, 2020
7 The BMJ Letter to the Editor November 13, 2020
8 Autoimmune Registry, Estimates of Prevalence
9 Observer October 20, 2020
10 The Hill November 24, 2020
11, 12 Kaiser Health News November 12, 2020
13 CNBC December 1, 2020
14 RT November 29, 2020
15 Forbes October 20, 2020
16 The Vaccine Reaction September 29, 2020
18, 19 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-5352
20 YouTube, SARS-CoV-2 and the rise of medical technocracy, Lee Merritt, MD, aprox 8 minutes in (Lie No. 1: Death Risk)
21 Technical Report June 2020 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.24350.77125
22 Johns Hopkins Newsletter November 26, 2020 (Archived)
23 Twitter JHU News-Letter November 26, 2020
24 Cell June 25, 2020; 181(7): 1489-1501.E15
25 Wall Street Journal June 12, 2020 (Archived)
26 Nature Immunology September 30, 2020 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x
27 The Lancet Microbe September 4, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30114-2
28 UPI September 4, 2020
29 Nature July 15, 2020; 584: 457-462
30 Daily Mail June 12, 2020
31 Science Times June 12, 2020
32 Nature Communications November 20, 2020; 11 Article number 5917
33, 34, 35 The BMJ 2020;371:m4037
36 NPR November 17, 2020
37, 42 Eurosurveillance June 30, 2011; 16(26)
38 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control September 20, 2012
39, 43 CIDRAP January 30, 2013
40 PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33536
41 BMJ 2013;346:f794
44 EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb; 40: 595–604
45 AIER March 22, 2020

[Ernie Nemeth]

So much data to say: the term 'effective' as used in relation to the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines coming to market is misleading.

[Savannah]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsA7wKXPMVY

NYC Public School teacher Michael Kane joined us on Sunday with Charles this past weekend. His message was so important, I've decided to extract the clip and repost it as a stand alone video. If you are in NYC and agree with Michael, you can attend the http://nyteachersforchoice.org protest next Wednesday December 16, 2020 at 3pm at the Dept of Education building in Staten Island.


This is very interesting. They found out that the testing, while boosting the numbers, is also about gathering our DNA. The testing company is like one of those DNA testing companies that test people who want to know their heritage. We know that they also patent our DNA. This is so dark and disgusting it should also go on the Horus Ray thread.

[onawah]

Leading Canadian Expert Outraged at Government Response to Covid
The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetuated on an Unsuspecting Public
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 09, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/09/coronavirus-hoax.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20201209_HL2&mid=DM742398&rid=1030526769

(Hyperlinks in the article which I did not embed, and 3 videos which I didn't know how to, so have asked Mods for help. )

"According to Dr. Roger Hodkinson, one of Canada’s top pathologists and an expert in virology, the COVID-19 pandemic is the “greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public”
Hodkinson stressed that PCR tests cannot diagnose infection and mass testing should therefore cease immediately. He also pointed out that social distancing and universal mask wearing are useless measures
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., former vice-president and chief scientific adviser for Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, has also spoken out about how fraudulent PCR testing is being used to manufacture the appearance of a pandemic that doesn’t really exist
Others who have identified the COVID-19 pandemic as a global hoax of unprecedented proportions include a group of German lawyers who founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee and are now laying the foundation for mass class-action lawsuits
Included are suggestions for how you can resist and defend against the global power grab and be part of the solution

According to Dr. Roger Hodkinson, one of Canada’s top pathologists and an expert in virology, the COVID-19 pandemic is the “greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.” Hodkinson made these blunt statements during a zoom conference with an Alberta Community and Public Services Committee (see video above).

Hodkinson is the CEO of Western Medical Assessments, a biotech company that manufactures COVID-19 PCR tests, so “I might know a little bit about all this,” he said, adding that the entire situation represents “politics playing medicine,” which is “a very dangerous game.”1

He stressed that PCR tests simply cannot diagnose infection and mass testing should therefore cease immediately. He also pointed out that social distancing is useless as the virus “is spread by aerosols which travel 30 meters or so.” As for face masks, Hodkinson stated that:

“Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue signaling. They’re not even worn effectively most of the time.

It’s utterly ridiculous. Seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people — I’m not saying that in a pejorative sense — seeing these people walking around like lemmings obeying without any knowledge base to put the mask on their face … Nothing could be done to stop the spread of the virus besides protecting older more vulnerable people.”

Former Pfizer Science Officer Claims COVID-19 Is a ScamHodkinson is far from alone in his assertions. For example, Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, has spoken out about how fraudulent PCR testing is being used to manufacture the appearance of a pandemic that doesn’t really exist.

As I explained in “Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear,” by using PCR testing, which cannot diagnose active infection, a false narrative has been created.

I’m calling out the statistics, and even the claim that there is an ongoing pandemic, as false. ~ Michael Yeadon, Ph.D.
Currently, rising “cases,” meaning positive tests, are being used yet again as the justification to impose more severe restrictions, including lockdowns and mandatory mask wearing, when in fact positive tests have nothing to do with the actual spread of illness, and nothing to do with the risk of death.

Like several other scientists, doctors and researchers, Yeadon has pointed out that there are no excess deaths due to COVID-19.2,3,4 According to Yeadon, who has analyzed the statistics, about 1,700 people die each day in the U.K. in any given year. Many of these deaths are now falsely attributed to COVID-19.

“I’m calling out the statistics, and even the claim that there is an ongoing pandemic, as false,” he said in a recent interview with British journalist Anna Brees (see video above). He challenges anyone who doesn’t believe him to seek out any database on total mortality. If you do that, you will find that the daily death count is “absolutely bang-on normal,” Yeadon said.

Like Hodkinson, Yeadon is concerned about the fact that the laws of immunology are being completely ignored — apparently in order to fit some hidden agenda.

While Yeadon is unwilling to guess at what might be behind the creation of these false narratives, or why scientific truth is being censored, others have linked together evidence pointing to the pandemic being used as an excuse for the redistribution of wealth and the technocratic takeover of the whole world under the banner of a “Great Reset.”

It’s being used to usher in social and economic changes that simply could never be introduced without some sort of calamity, be it war or a biological threat, because they involve a radical limitation of personal freedoms, including medical and financial freedom, and the elimination of privacy and private ownership. In short, no one in their right mind would agree to the changes that are coming, which is why fear is being used as a tool to coerce compliance.

As noted in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences paper5 “COVID-19 Emergency Measures and the Impending Authoritarian Pandemic,” written by Stephen Thompson and Eric C. Ip, both from the University of Hong Kong:

“This Article demonstrates — with diverse examples drawn from across the world — there are unmistakable regressions into authoritarianism in governmental efforts to contain the virus.

Despite the unprecedented nature of this challenge, there is no sound justification for systemic erosion of rights-protective democratic ideals and institutions beyond that which is strictly demanded by the exigencies of the pandemic …

With a gratuitous toll being inflicted on democracy, civil liberties, fundamental freedoms, healthcare ethics, and human dignity, this has the potential to unleash humanitarian crises no less devastating than COVID-19 in the long run."

German Lawyers Gear Up to Expose the HoaxOthers who have identified the COVID-19 pandemic as a global hoax of unprecedented proportions include a group of German lawyers who founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee.6,7 They are now preparing the biggest class-action lawsuit in history,8,9,10,11 in which they seek to prove that fraudulent PCR tests are being misused to engineer the appearance of a dangerous pandemic.

“This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a corona scandal; and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages,” Reiner Fuellmich said during a video announcement of the committee’s tort case (see video above).

Key questions the committee seeks to answer through judicial means include:

Is there a COVID-19 pandemic or is there only a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test pandemic? — Specifically, does a positive PCR test result mean that the individual is infected with SARS-CoV-2 and has COVID-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the COVID-19 infection?
Do pandemic response measures such as lockdowns, mask mandates, social distancing and quarantine regulations serve to protect the world's population from COVID-19, or do these measures serve only to make people panic and therefore comply with liberty-eroding edicts?
Fuellmich’s team also stress that SARS-CoV-2 — which is touted as one of the most serious threats to life in modern history — “has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world.” Pandemic measures, on the other hand, have “caused the loss of innumerable human lives, and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide,” Fuellmich noted in his announcement.

As I discussed in yesterday’s article, “Emergency COVID-19 Vaccines May Cause Massive Side Effects,” modern history is filled with pandemic scares, none of which has panned out and lived up to projected death tolls. The technocrats in charge have had plenty of practice, and COVID-19 appears to be the crown jewel of their pandemic war arsenal.

Everything was in place this time. The mainstream media, Big Tech, key government leaders, nongovernmental organizations and their chosen health “experts” — all have worked in tandem to manufacture unreasonable and illogical fear. Together, they’ve effectively promoted falsehoods while simultaneously censoring truth. The end result is devastating to democracy, freedom and public health.

Others Speaking Out About COVID Hoax
One medical professional who is now speaking openly about the COVID-19 pandemic being a brazen power-grab by the technocratic elite is Dr. Lee Merritt, an orthopedic spinal surgeon with a medical practice in Logan, Iowa.12

August 16, 2020, she delivered a speech at the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness13 convention in Las Vegas, Nevada, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” in which she dissected the many fear-inducing lies we’ve been told about this pandemic.

When you look at the actual data and statistics available, and compare them to what we’re being told by government officials and the media, it becomes evident that there’s a gulf between the two. The data tell us SARS-CoV-2 is not the existential threat it’s been made out to be so, clearly, they want us to be fearful for some other reason.

Merritt suggests it’s because a fearful public will not put up a fight when their human rights are stripped away. Indeed, many who are fearful will gladly relinquish any and all freedoms. As noted by British Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption in a March 30, 2020, interview with The Post:14

“The real problem is that when human societies lose their freedom, it’s not usually because tyrants have taken it away. It’s usually because people willingly surrender their freedom in return for protection against some external threat. And the threat is usually a real threat but usually exaggerated.

That’s what I fear we are seeing now. The pressure on politicians has come from the public. They want action. They don’t pause to ask whether the action will work. They don’t ask themselves whether the cost will be worth paying …

Anyone who has studied history will recognize here the classic symptoms of collective hysteria. Hysteria is infectious. We are working ourselves up into a lather in which we exaggerate the threat and stop asking ourselves whether the cure may be worse than the disease.”

The End Goal Is Total Control
t2vqjBtnltI

Vladimir Kvachkov, a former colonel of Russian military intelligence, would probably agree with the assessment that the fearmongering has a purpose other than keeping us safe from a respiratory virus. In the video above, Kvachkov refers to COVID-19 as a false pandemic, planned and implemented with the goal of gaining totalitarian control over the world population.

“It’s all a lie and needs to be considered as a global, strategic special operation,” Kvachkov says. “These are command and staff exercises of the world’s behind-the-scenes powers on controlling humanity.”

Comparing it to a military exercise, Kvachkov says the ultimate aim is to reduce the world’s population to 1 billion “ordinary” people and just 100 million of those in control — with the ordinary people being there to serve the 100 million.

In short, he says, the “artificially created” and “purposely spread” coronavirus has four dimensions. The first is religion and population reduction; the second is to establish political control over humanity; the third is to deflate the world economy; and the fourth is to eliminate geo-economic competition.

It’s important to remember that the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum and the United Nations are all private corporations, yet they wield tremendous power over the governments of the world and act above the law of any given nation.

Big Tech also plays an enormous role in this usurpation of power. The power grab probably couldn’t succeed without them, because the greatest threat to would-be totalitarian rulers is an informed and educated public. By banding together to censor certain information and segments of the global population, Big Tech is instrumental in undermining the foundation for democracy around the world.

What Can You Do?
More and more people around the world are now starting to wake up to the fact that the restrictions put into place under the guise of protecting public health are here to stay. They’re part of a much larger, long-term plan, and the end goal is to usher in a new way of life, devoid of our previous freedoms. This means that, eventually, everyone must decide which is more important: Personal liberty or false security?

To derail the technocrats plan, we have to make full use of the judicial system, which is why Fuellmich and his team are suing to expose the fraud, put an end to pandemic restrictions and restore our human rights. Class-action lawsuits are currently being prepared in the U.S. and Canada.

Lawsuits are also being prepared in Germany, and the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee is working on the creation of legal guidelines and data caches that attorneys around the world will be able to use to file their own legal challenges. Fuellmich can be contacted via www.fuellmich.com, and the Corona Inquiry Committee via corona-ausschuss.de.

In closing, here’s a summary list of suggestions compiled from Fuellmich, Yeadon and others as to how you can resist and be part of the solution:

•Turn off mainstream media news and turn to independent experts — Do the research. Read through the science. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Defender newsletter is one reliable source for “banned” news. Other sources include America’s Frontline Doctors and Doctors for the Truth (Medicos por la verdad — a group of more than 600 doctors in Spain).

•Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions — The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn’t a pandemic anymore.

•If you are a medical professional, especially if you’re a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts.

•Sign The Great Barrington Declaration,15 which calls for an end to lockdowns.

•Join a group so that you can have support. Examples of groups formed to fight against government overreach include:

◦Us for Them, a group campaigning for reopening schools and protecting children’s rights in the U.K.

◦The COVID Recovery Group (CRG), founded by 50 conservative British MPs to fight lockdown restrictions16

◦The Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. team of attorneys, doctors, business owners and parents who are fighting to protect freedom and liberty"

Sources and References
1 Summit News November 18, 2020
2 YouTube, SARS-CoV-2 and the rise of medical technocracy, Lee Merritt, MD, aprox 8 minutes in (Lie No. 1: Death Risk)
3 Technical Report June 2020 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.24350.77125
4 Johns Hopkins Newsletter November 26, 2020 (Archived)
5 Journal of Law and the Biosciences September 29, 2020; Isaa064
6 Acu2020.org Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, English
7 Algora October 4, 2020
8 Orwell1984366490226.wordpress.com October 5, 2020
9 Age of Autism Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
10 Internationalfreepress.com October 6, 2020
11 Nexus Newsfeed Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
12 Burgess Health Center, Lee Merritt, MD
13 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness
14 Unherd The Post March 30, 2020
15 Great Barrington Declaration
16 City AM November 11, 2020

[greybeard]

Former diplomat to China explains the ‘weaponisation of COVID’ | 60 Minutes Australia



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkCFDDCkG1k

[Tintin]

An important development from Florida concerning the PCR tests and the reporting of Ct (cycle threshold) values:

https://www.flhealthsource.gov/files/Laboratory-Reporting-CT-Values-12032020.pdf

https://www.flhealthsource.gov/files/Laboratory-Reporting-CT-Values-12032020.pdf

[Tintin]

:bump:

Zev Zelenko + Carole Lierbermann: a terrific interview which I've just finished listening to. It's now in the library in the CV directory in a bespoke Zev Zelenko (http://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Zev_Zelenko/lieberman-interview-120820.mp3) folder.

At about 10 mins in he specs out how he got to the HCQ + Zinc prophylaxis. It's around 45 mins or so (without ad breaks). He should get a Nobel Peace prize this guy.

(Carole Liebermann - psychiatrist)

Here's a downloadable file link: https://cdn.voiceamerica.com/voice/012008/lieberman120820.mp3

[Tintin]

Cross posting from the Internet Censorship thread:


Chris Martenson's 3 December video about the clear efficacy of Ivermectin as a Covid treatment, carefully citing and reading through published scientific papers, was removed. (I have it downloaded, as I have 80 other videos of his in case his whole channel goes.)

He uploaded a video last night about what happened:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE2EcKm5Uj4

Related: the two papers that his Dec 3rd video predominantly referred to are these:

https://osf.io/wx3zn/ - Title:Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-%E2%80%93-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf Title: An overview of the MATH+ and I-MASK+ Protocols - A Guide to the Management of COVID-19

I'll pop these in the library just as soon as.

Here's a great resource link from where I obtained the papers: https://covexit.com/chris-martenson-phd-hails-ivermectin-as-silver-bullet/

[onawah]

How Changing the Definition of Pandemic Altered Our World
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 10, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/10/1976-swine-flu-pandemic.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20201210_HL2&mid=DM743395&rid=1031261309
wIFnmuiW7I8

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Had it not been for the World Health Organization changing the definition of “pandemic,” COVID-19 would no longer be an issue. The WHO’s original definition of a pandemic specified simultaneous epidemics worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses”
This definition was changed in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The WHO removed the severity and high mortality criteria, leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a disease”
This is how COVID-19 is still promoted as a pandemic even though it has caused no excess mortality in nine months
In 1976, fear of an impending swine flu pandemic led to the deployment of a fast-tracked vaccine that injured thousands and killed at least 300. In the end, the pandemic never materialized. The 1976 swine flu vaccine program has been cited as the origin of the anti-vaccine movement
Other hyped pandemics that were predicted to become global killers — but didn’t — include the 2005 bird flu outbreak and the H1N1 swine flu pandemic of 2009, a vaccine for which caused narcolepsy in thousands of European children

Mid-March 2020 predictions said COVID-19 would kill 2.2 million Americans if allowed to run its course.1 By the end of March, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, downgraded the projected death toll, saying we were probably looking at 100,000 to 240,000 Americans dying.2

April 8, 2020, a new model referred to as the Murray Model3 downgraded the threat further, predicting COVID-19 will kill 60,000 in the U.S. by August 20204 — a number that is still 20,000 lower than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's death toll numbers attributed to the seasonal flu the winter of 2017/2018.5

Now, nine months into the pandemic, mortality statistics clearly show the truth: The COVID-19 pandemic is a pandemic in name only. In reality, there's no excess mortality,6,7,8 and had it not been for the World Health Organization changing the definition of "pandemic," COVID-19 would no longer be an issue.

I know some will balk at the concept of no excess mortality but the truth is the truth, and when you examine the existing numbers, that is what you find. If you integrate the U.S. Centers for Disease and Prevention's comments that 94% of those who died had comorbidities, which could easily be the real cause of the reported "COVID-19 deaths," it then becomes obvious that the numbers were highly inflated.

Definition of Pandemic Substantially Altered
The WHO's original definition of a pandemic was:9,10

"… when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness."

The key portion of that definition is "enormous numbers of deaths and illness." This definition was changed in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The change was a simple but substantial one: They merely removed the severity and high mortality criteria, leaving the definition of a pandemic as "a worldwide epidemic of a disease."11

This switch in definition allowed the WHO to declare swine flu a pandemic after a mere 144 people had died from the infection, worldwide, and it's why COVID-19 is still promoted as a pandemic even though it has caused no excess mortality in nine months.12,13,14

We now have plenty of data showing the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.15,16,17,18,19 It may be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is about the same. The absolute risk of death is equivalent to the risk of dying in a car accident.20,21

By removing the criteria of severe illness causing high morbidity, leaving geographically widespread infection as the only criteria for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world were able to bamboozle the global population into giving up our lives and livelihoods.

As noted by Reiner Fuellmich, an attorney and founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, the COVID-19 pandemic is "probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed."22,23,24,25

This certainly isn't the first time doom and gloom predictions of mass casualties have completely collapsed. It's also not the first time that fast-tracked pandemic vaccines have been issued, with devastating effect.

In that regard, we can learn a lot from the 1976 swine flu pandemic, detailed in the 1979 "60 Minutes" episode featured above. This was also the first time drug companies were indemnified against liability for any harm that might result from a fast-tracked vaccine.

The Swine Flu Fraud of 1976
In February 1976, secretary of health F. David Matthews warned the American people there were indications that the virus responsible for the deadly 1918 flu pandemic had returned. In January that year, a 19-year-old Army private had died from flu-related pneumonia, despite being in good health, and by the end of the month, 155 soldiers at Fort Dix tested positive for swine flu antibodies.

Projections suggested the dreaded virus would kill 1 million Americans before the end of 1976.26 "The government propaganda machine cranked into action," "60 Minutes" says, urging all Americans to get vaccinated against the swine flu.

Americans who got the swine flu vaccine were told it had been properly field tested. What they were not told was that the vaccine they received was not the actual vaccine that had undergone testing.
According to "60 Minutes," 46 million Americans got the vaccine, and over the next few years, thousands of Americans filed vaccine damage claims with the federal government.27

This was well before the 1986 Vaccine Compensation Act, so vaccines were still liable for damages at that time. Congress did grant the swine flu vaccine special immunity, though, and wound up paying (actually U.S. taxpayers did) for the $3.5 billion in damages the vaccine caused. A 1981 report by the U.S. General Accounting Office to Sen. John Durkin reads, in part:28

"Before the swine flu program there were comparatively few vaccine-related claims made against the Government. Since 1963, Public Health Service records showed that only 27 non-swine flu claims were filed.

However, as of December 31, 1979, we found that 3,839 claims and 988 lawsuits had been filed against the Government alleging injury, death, or other damage resulting from the 45 million swine flu immunizations given under the program.

A Justice official told us that as of October 2, 1980, 3,965 claims and 1,384 lawsuits had been filed. Of the 3,965 claims filed, the Justice official said 316 claims had been settled for about $12.3 million …"

$3.5 Billion Dollars in Damages Paid for Vaccine Injuries
According to "60 Minutes," the final claims amount for the nearly 4,000 claimants ended up totaling $3.5 billion. Two-thirds of the claimants suffered neurological damage and at least 300 of them died from vaccine side effects. In the end, the pandemic itself never materialized.29 An article by Real Clear Politics described the timeline of the pandemic that wasn't, and the circumstances that led to the indemnification of vaccine makers:30

"All of the reported swine flu cases had been limited to the soldiers in Private Lewis' camp. The virus wasn't spreading. For some reason this information did not mollify the doctors, and on Feb. 14, 1976, the CDC issued a notice to all U.S. hospitals to be on the lookout for any cases of swine flu.

By March … not one case of swine flu had been reported outside of Fort Dix. For some reason this news did not placate the doctors either, and on March 13, 1976, the director of the CDC asked Congress for money to develop and test enough swine flu vaccine to immunize at least 80% of the population of the United States …

By July, [scientists] were pretty much agreed that a flu pandemic in 1976 would not lead to 1 million U.S. dead. The flu strain extracted from Private Lewis, they learned, was much less virulent that the 1918 strain …

The World Health Organization ordered hospitals to keep a global lookout for swine flu, but it did not request mass immunization ... But the U.S. government was unstoppable. Congress began to pressure the drug companies to work faster toward development of a swine flu vaccine …

The drug companies suggested that they could work faster if they were given immunity from lawsuits in the event something went wrong with the vaccine. Congress refused. The issue of legal liability remained at an impasse until Aug. 2, 1976.

On that day, two members of the American Legion died of a strange respiratory disease they acquired at the Legion's convention in Philadelphia. Congress collectively freaked.

Panicky news reports out of Philadelphia hinted that the deaths were the beginning of the Great Swine Flu Epidemic of 1976. On Aug. 3, Congress agreed to completely indemnify the drug companies against any and all lawsuits they might incur as a result of the distribution of swine flu vaccine."

CDC Lied About Swine Flu Vaccine Safety
According to "60 Minutes," Americans who got the swine flu vaccine were told it had been properly field tested. What they were not told was that the vaccine they received was not the actual vaccine that had undergone testing.

What's more, according to Dr. Michael Hattwick, who directed the surveillance team for the 1976 swine flu vaccination program at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there was evidence showing influenza vaccinations could, and had, caused neurological complications in the past.

He claims he warned his superiors of this possibility, as it pertained to the swine flu campaign. Yet the CDC denied the evidence and the American public was never informed of this risk. "60 Minutes" also reveals the CDC was proven to have lied in its marketing materials for the vaccine.

Judy Roberts was one of the victims of that 1976 vaccination campaign. She was paralyzed by the vaccine, and suffered permanent damage. Her husband, who also was vaccinated and suffered no ill effects, ends the "60 Minute" segment saying:

"I told Judy to take the shot … I'm mad with my government. They knew the facts but they didn't release those facts, because if they had released them, people wouldn't have taken it.

And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's going to be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies next to me, and I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take."

The Origin of the Anti-Vaccine Movement
The 1976 swine flu vaccine program has sometimes been cited as the origin of the anti-vaccine movement, and for good reason. Thousands were seriously injured and hundreds died after placing their trust in scientists and the government. Many of them, just like Roberts in the "60 Minutes" segment, vowed never to be that naïve again. As reported by Smithsonian Magazine in 2017:31

"In the spring of 1976, it looked like that year's flu was the real thing. Spoiler alert: it wasn't, and rushed response led to a medical debacle that hasn't gone away.

'Some of the American public's hesitance to embrace vaccines — the flu vaccine in particular — can be attributed to the long-lasting effects of a failed 1976 campaign to mass-vaccinate the public against a strain of the swine flu virus,' writes Rebecca Kreston for Discover.

'This government-led campaign was widely viewed as a debacle and put an irreparable dent in future public health initiative, as well as negatively influenced the public's perception of both the flu and the flu shot in this country.'"

Pandemic Threats Have Repeatedly Turned to Naught
Sadly, the embarrassment of the 1976 swine flu debacle did not put an end to faux pandemics. In the last 15 years alone we've had to defend against wave upon wave of pandemic pandemonium, none of which turned out to be the global killer that "experts" predicted.

The 2005 bird flu outbreak, for example, was predicted to kill anywhere from 2 million to 150 million people. In reality, the death toll topped out at just 98 people, globally, in 2005; 115 in 2006; and 86 in 2007.32 No one in the U.S. died from this infection, and the sheer brazenness of this fake pandemic prompted me to write my New York Times best seller book "The Great Bird Flu Hoax."

In 2006, 2007 and again in 2008, hyped warnings over the bird flu were repeatedly exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear and line the pocketbooks of industry and various vested individuals.

Then came the now infamous H1N1 swine flu of 2009.33 The CDC estimates that from April 12, 2009, to April 10, 2010, there were 60.8 million cases of H1N1 infection, 274,000 hospitalizations and 12,469 deaths in the United States. The infection fatality rate was a mere 0.02%. Then, as now, vaccines were fast-tracked. Lo and behold, within months, cases of disability and death from the H1N1 vaccine were reported in various parts of the world.

In 2010, the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked34 to childhood narcolepsy, which had abruptly skyrocketed in several countries during the vaccination campaign.35,36

In the aftermath, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) raised serious questions about the WHO's handling of the pandemic and the role drug companies may have played in its drug and vaccine recommendations.

In June 2010, PACE concluded "the handling of the pandemic by the WHO, EU health agencies and national governments led to a 'waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.'"37

Specifically, PACE concluded there was "overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO," and that the drug industry had influenced the organization's decision-making.38

The sad reality is that the WHO is little more than a front group for Big Pharma and the technocratic elite that seek to "reset" the global economic and social structure. It would indeed be naïve to expect this private organization to do what's right for public health while simultaneously taking direction from Bill Gates (its primary funder) and the drug industry.

While the 2009 swine flu pandemic was the most significant in terms of the fearmongering brought to bear, in the summer of 2012, dire predictions of mutating bird flu again filled the media, followed by urgent calls for yet another fast-tracked vaccine.

Two years later, in 2014, the Ebola virus turned into a global health emergency after epidemics in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone had been largely ignored. Interestingly enough, a UN resolution called for no restrictions on international travel to Ebola-stricken countries — a decision that led to an infected passenger bringing the infection to the U.S.

Another two years after that, in 2016, Zika virus hit pandemic status,39 triggering travel alerts and restrictions in and out of affected regions. All of these pandemics defied experts' predictions of mass casualties. None turned into a global killer, and COVID-19 is no different.40,41,42

Why We Must End Gain-of-Function Research
Time and again, serious safety breaches have been identified at laboratories working with the most lethal and dangerous pathogens in the world,43,44,45,46,47,48,49 and mounting evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 may be a lab creation as well.

Scientists defend and promote gain-of-function research by insisting it allows us to prepare for pandemics.50 In reality, this kind of research does not appear to have improved governments' pandemic responses in the least. If anything, it's a curious coincidence that the very viruses undergoing gain-of-function research are the ones causing pandemics.

As just one example, an article51 by Mark Denison, editor of mBio, presents a hypothesis for the 1977-1978 H1N1 swine flu pandemic, often referred to as the Russian flu, as the first cases were reported in the USSR. According to Denison, the pandemic "was probably not a natural event, as the genetic sequence of the virus was nearly identical to the sequences of decades-old strains."

The lab hypothesis has "gained popularity in discussions about the biosafety risks of gain-of-function influenza virus research, as an argument for why this research should not be performed," he writes. Another possibility being kicked around is that the infection spread through a live-vaccine trial. A third option: a deliberate release as a bioweapon.

As noted in a 2009 New England Journal of Medicine review article, which provided a historical perspective on the emergence of H1N1 viruses:52

"Even though human influenza A (H1N1) virus had not circulated since 1957 and the swine influenza A (H1N1) virus that had been identified at Fort Dix did not extend outside the base, in November 1977, the H1N1 strain reemerged in the former Soviet Union, Hong Kong, and northeastern China.

This strain affected primarily young people in a relatively mild presentation. Careful study of the genetic origin of the virus showed that it was closely related to a 1950 strain but dissimilar to influenza A (H1N1) strains from both 1947 and 1957.

This finding suggested that the 1977 outbreak strain had been preserved since 1950. The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens."

Can history repeat itself? There are no guarantees that it can't or won't, which is why it's so important we find out where SARS-CoV-2 really came from. As noted by the National Review,53 getting to the bottom of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial if we want to prevent a similar pandemic in the future:

"If it originated from a person eating bat or pangolin at a wet market, then we need to take steps to ensure that bat and pangolin consumption and trade stops …

Bat guano is used as fertilizer in many countries, and that guano can be full of viruses … If this is the source of the virus, we need to get people to stop going into caves and using the guano as fertilizer …

In a strange way, the 'lab accident' scenario is one of the most reassuring explanations. It means that if we want to ensure we never experience this again, we simply need to get every lab in the world working on contagious viruses to ensure 100% compliance with safety protocols, all the time." "

+ Sources and References
1 The Intercept March 17, 2020
2 CNN March 31, 2020
3 IHME April 2, 2020
4 CNN April 8, 2020
5 STAT September 26, 2018
6, 12, 40 YouTube, SARS-CoV-2 and the rise of medical technocracy, Lee Merritt, MD, aprox 8 minutes in (Lie No. 1: Death Risk)
7, 13, 41 Technical Report June 2020 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.24350.77125
8, 14, 42 Johns Hopkins Newsletter November 26, 2020 (Archived)
9 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912
10 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness May 1, 2009 (PDF)
11 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness September 2, 2009 (PDF)
15 The Mercury News May 20, 2020 (Archived)
16 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-5352
17 Breitbart May 7, 2020
18 Scott Atlas US Senate Testimony May 6, 2020 (PDF)
19 John Ioannidis US Senate Testimony May 6, 2020 (PDF)
20 medRxiv May 5, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.05.20054361
21 Environmental Research September 2020; 188: 109890
22 Orwell1984366490226.wordpress.com October 5, 2020
23 Age of Autism Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
24 Internationalfreepress.com October 6, 2020
25 Nexus Newsfeed Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
26, 30 Real Clear Politics April 28, 2009
27, 28 GAO.gov, Report to US Senator Durkin, January 14, 1981 (PDF)
29 WHO.int Swine Flu of 1976
31 Smithsonian Magazine February 6, 2017
32 AIER March 22, 2020
33 CDC.gov June 11, 2009
34 Eurosurveillance June 30, 2011; 16(26)
35 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control September 20, 2012
36 CIDRAP January 30, 2013
37, 38 Assembly.coe.int June 24, 2010
39 CBS News January 28, 2016
43 Institute of Medicine. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories 2011.
44 The Guardian December 4, 2014
45 CIDRAP July 1, 2016
46 Reuters February 15, 2012
47 CIDRAP June 20, 2014
48 Asia Times April 6, 2020
49 Science September 28, 2007; 317(5846): 1852-1854
50 Newsweek April 28, 2020
51 mBio DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01013-15
52 NEJM 2009; 361:279-285
53 National Review April 16, 2020

[greybeard]

Vaccines are a biological weapon of mass destruction --there is no pandemic.


https://new.awakeningchannel.com/cv19-vaccines-are-a-biological-weapon-of-mass-destruction-there-is-no-pandemic/

Im not fond of opening presentation, but never the less, this website does come up with some good information.
This one a bit scary, but may be so
Chris

[ExomatrixTV]

Not a Conspiracy: Your COVID Vaccine ‘Passport’ is HERE
3CGr0rOuqYg

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 11th December 2020

A lot about USA election and giving a background to CIA involvement.
Chris


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GOVSjwtAT0

[pueblo]

Is there really no end to this evil stupidity? Makes me want to get all radicalised.



Australia Scraps Billion Dollar Coronavirus Vaccine After Participants Test HIV Positive

December 11, 2020

The Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.

The University of Queensland has abruptly ended its trials for coronavirus vaccine the Australian government had ordered in a $1 billion deal for 51 million doses. The deal was terminated after participants returned false positive HIV test results over fears that vaccine mishap would damage the public’s confidence in the COVID-19 vaccination program.

On Friday the Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, said:

“University of Queensland vaccine will not be able to proceed based on the scientific advice, and that will no longer feature as part of Australia’s vaccine plan.

Australian vaccine scientist Nikolai Petrovsky had warned the government about the risk of including HIV in a vaccine months before the $1billion deal was signed.

https://greatgameindia.com/australia-scraps-coronavirus-vaccine/

[greybeard]

Dozens of GP practices in England opt out of Covid vaccine rollout

I wonder if this is the real reason GPs are opting out
Chris


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/dozens-gp-practices-england-opt-111134179.html

[norman]

Is China vaccinating it's population ?


I've heard absolutely NOTHING to suggest they care a crap about covid .

[ExomatrixTV]

Politicians now are telling DOCTORS how to practice medicine?

ILajunU_Dvk

[Philippe]

White House 'threatens to sack' FDA chief if Pfizer vaccine not approved today

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/white-house-threatens-to-sack-fda-chief-if-pfizer-vaccine-not-approved-today/ar-BB1bRaOb?ocid=msedgntp

Very troubling because we know what these new vaccines can do

We have read speculations about Trump's and Putin's bluff with vaccination. But why now this heavy push to get the Pfizer vaccine approved? The election campaign is over, so why does he bother? Unless he wants only the American vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine for France is now being imported from their mega factory in Belgium.
Any explanation from the USA about what is up with Trump?

[greybeard]

White House 'threatens to sack' FDA chief if Pfizer vaccine not approved today

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/white-house-threatens-to-sack-fda-chief-if-pfizer-vaccine-not-approved-today/ar-BB1bRaOb?ocid=msedgntp

Very troubling because we know what these new vaccines can do

We have read speculations about Trump's and Putin's bluff with vaccination. But why now this heavy push to get the Pfizer vaccine approved? The election campaign is over, so why does he bother? Unless he wants only the American vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine for France is now being imported from their mega factory in Belgium.
Any explanation from the USA about what is up with Trump?

Those in control of vaccine delivery can also halt it at the last moment --ie if protocol not adhered to.
The rumour being Trump is anti this vaccine and will stop it at the moment ill practise can be proved.
He is seemingly setting traps for the likes of Bill Gates and therfore vaccine companies.
Im not holding my breath -- all too complex for me.
Chris

[rgray222]

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/131113646_3677619615662036_3376725619033789308_o.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=f6p_PX7UXWgAX-Ub4s7&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=5b26782979d00094ec5768ff3fb2db29&oe=5FF944D2

[Rawhide68]

norman, I remember when had covid, I even prayed for you mother Mary for your life

[Eva2]

Although, like others, I too believe there are many strains of this virus, some with more extreme symptoms than others, but I do feel, from everything that I have read, that all strains are treatable.

'Something to think about by Stan Fiddis
Just A Thought............
The world is going to Sh@t! 📷📷 And thats a fact.
Good thing is we are not going to run out of 📷📷📷.
Take a minute to read then take a few minutes to really ponder📷📷 THESE FACTS.
"The Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan is owned by Glaxosmithkline who (by coincidence) owns Pfizer! (the one who produces the vaccine for the virus that (by coincidence) started in the biological laboratory in Wuhan, which (by coincidence) was funded by Dr. Fauci who is (by coincidence) promoting the vaccine!)
GlaxoSmithKline (by coincidence) is managed by Black Rock finances who (by coincidence) manages the finances of the Open Foundation Company (Soros Foundation) which (by coincidence) serves the French AXA!
By coincidence Soros owns the German company Winterthur which (by coincidence) built the Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and was bought by the German Allianz which (by coincidence) has Vanguard as a shareholder which (by coincidence) is a shareholder of Black Rock, which (by coincidence) controls the central banks and manages about one third of the global investment capital.
Black Rock (by coincidence) is also a major shareholder of MICROSOFT, the property of Bill Gates, who (by coincidence) is a shareholder of Pfitzer (which--you remember?--is selling the miracle Vaccine) and (by coincidence) is currently the first sponsor of WHO !!!
So now you understand how a dead bat sold in a wet market in China infected the ENTIRE PLANET with a virus no more lethal than the annual flu!
( I DONT THINK THERE EVER WAS A BAT)'

[Hughe]

You can write to the hospital administration here to complain at this outrageous, Soviet-style treatment of Professor Fourtillan: direction.careiron@ch-uzes.fr

Accomplished pharma prof thrown in psych hospital after questioning official COVID narrative
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/accomplished-pharma-prof-thrown-in-psych-hospital-after-questioning-official-covid-narrative
Early on December 10, Jean-Bernard Fourtillan was taken from his home by a team of French law enforcement officers under military command and forcibly placed in solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of Uzès.
Fri Dec 11, 2020 - 7:35 pm EST

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 21.05.41.png
Uzès, home of the psychiatric hospital where Jean-Bernard Fourtillan is being held against his will. Begir / Shutterstock.com
By Jeanne Smits, Paris correspondent

December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Early on December 10, Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, a French retired university professor known for his strong opposition to COVID-19 vaccines such as those presently being distributed in the U.K., was taken from his temporary home in the south of France by a team of "gendarmes" — French law enforcement officers under military command — and forcibly placed in solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of Uzès. His mobile phones were taken from him, and at the time of writing, he had not been allowed to communicate with the outside world.

The systematic use of psychiatric hospitals in order to silence or punish political opponents became widespread under communism, having started shortly after the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917. The method developed under Stalin and then expanded as opposition to the "socialist paradise" came to be considered a sign of mental illness. Under the 1966 penal code of the USSR, repression of dissidents openly targeted those who "spread false propaganda defaming the Soviet State and its social system."
Fourtillan, a longtime critic of vaccines that use dangerous adjuvants such as aluminum (the 11 compulsory vaccines for newborns contain 17 times the maximum dose of aluminum defined as toxic by the World Health Organization), has been vocal during the COVID-19 crisis. He offers "alternative" explanations and warnings regarding the apparition of the SARS-COV-2 virus and the ARN vaccines that work by injecting pieces of virus message ARN with nanolipids with the aim of causing human cells to start fabricating viral particles and to thus trigger an immunological reaction.

In particular, Fourtillan has accused the French Institut Pasteur, a private non-profit foundation that specializes in biology, micro-organisms, contagious diseases, and vaccination, of having "fabricated" the SARS-COV-2 virus over several decades and been a party to its "escape" from the Wuhan P4 lab — unbeknownst to the lab's Chinese authorities — which was built following an agreement between France and China signed in 2004.

Relations between France and China regarding the project cooled over the years as China put its own interests first, but in 2017, France's then–Interior minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, joined the official opening ceremony of the Wuhan Institute of Virology's P4 lab, together with Yves Lévy, co-president of the steering committee. Lévy is the husband of Agnès Buzyn, who was France's health minister when the COVID-19 crisis erupted. She was also responsible for signing the decree that banned over-the-counter sales of hydroxychloroquine in France in January 2020.
Is Jean-Bernard Fourtillan's accusation true? While the Institut Pasteur has verbally announced that it would sue Fourtillan over the accusation, no judiciary action has been forthcoming on that front, and indeed, Fourtillan himself has since lodged a complaint against a spokesman of the Institute for "libel and lies that are prejudicial to the peoples of the world."

Fourtillan himself has said he hopes legal proceedings will allow him to produce evidence he has built up: he is in fact anxious to debate the issues at stake. Now that he is in a psychiatric hospital, the possibility of this happening — in the interest of discovering the truth — is becoming more remote.

Among the public documents Fourtillan has analyzed and made public are patents for SARS-COV-1, which contains parts of the malaria virus, dating back to 2003. The patents were used by various labs to develop vaccines. Two thousand eleven saw the Institut Pasteur filing a further patent application for "SARS-COV-2," which was identical to the previous one, according to Fourtillan, who says this was done because commercial exploitation of the first patent started in 2003 and would expire 20 years later, in 2023. According to Fourtillan, four sequences of the HIV virus — responsible for AIDS — were added to the virus, in view of creating further vaccines.

This point was also raised in France last April by Prof. Luc Montagnier, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize for medicine for having discovered HIV in 1983 together with another French scientist, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi. Last April, Montagnier stated that the SARS-COV-2 virus was the result of a human manipulation. He was ridiculed by the mainstream media, but in August, an Italian microbiologist reached the same conclusion: Prof. Joseph Tritto published a book calling the Wuhan virus a "chimera."

Montagnier, who had worked with a mathematician, described his findings through an analogy. Imagine the coronavirus as a "puzzle" with 30,000 pieces, and then consider several other 9,000-piece puzzles representing HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV (another retrovirus close to the AIDS virus but targeting monkeys). If three pieces coming from each one of these smaller puzzles were to be found next to each other in the 30,000-piece puzzle, the probability of this having happened naturally would be nil. This is analogous to the presence of parts of the HIV sequence in SARS-COV-2, according to Montagnier.

According to Fourtillan, the present virus causing COVID-19 is this artificial virus. Fourtillan — as well as other researchers of the present crisis — considers this indisputable evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned. He believes that on October 13, 2015, a patent application was filed for a COVID-19 test; this was followed by commercialization in the whole world in 2017 for a whopping 10 billion dollars.

These claims are disputed on the grounds that the reference to the 2015 patent is only part of the later May 2020 patent, also filed by one Richard A. Rothschild, but was quoted as related to the remote diagnosis of COVID-19, enhancing the original patent as it were for the particular case of COVID-19.

Who is right? A sincere, public assessment and debate would lift any confusion or error, voluntary or not, but Fourtillan is now being treated as if he were both dangerous and insane.

Fourtillan gained widespread publicity when a recent film by Pierre Barnérias, giving a voice to critics of the official narrative, became viral in France. In Hold-Up, Fourtillan spoke of his concern that the COVID-19 crisis was fabricated and is being used to impose a dangerous vaccine on the world population.

Fourtillan is himself familiar with patenting procedures, as his résumé shows, having personally filed some 400 patents in the medical field. The French internet medium France Soir described him as follows: "Jean-Bernard FOURTILLAN, Ph.D., Chemical Engineer, Pharmacist, Hospital Pharmacist, Professor of Therapeutic Chemistry and Pharmacokinetics at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacology of the University of Poitiers, Expert Pharmacologist Toxicologist, specialized in Pharmacokinetics."

Fourtillan's forced internment made no mention of the COVID-19 controversy, which to date has led to no judicial proceedings, instead being officially linked to a lawsuit that has been opened against him for illegal practice of medicine because of his work on a hormonal patch against neuro-degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, and others affecting motricity, balance, and memory, as well as sleep disorders.

His theory is that pollution, adjuvants such as aluminum in vaccines, and electro-magnetic interference destroy dark matter in the brain through lack of hormones, and he has — successfully, he claims — tested the administration of a hormone patch of valentonin and 6-Méthoxy-Harmalan (sleep and waking hormones), to compensate the damage, on 402 adults, himself included, who accepted the procedure under their sole responsibility and who were warned that the patch was not a drug, but a "technical sample, not for human use." The procedure costs only a fraction of the price of newly developed drugs for these conditions.

Fourtillan had had a good rapport with the judge charged with the preliminary investigation of the case, Brigitte Jolivet of Poitiers. During his first interrogations at the end of 2019, she appeared to be convinced by his arguments, and the case was proceeding normally.

Last month, Fourtillan, who was staying in the south of France with his wife, was visited by four gendarmes coming from Marseille, who entered his rented cottage and asked for his computers. Although they had no search warrant, Fourtillan handed them over, saying he had nothing to hide, and that on the contrary, he was anxious to have his documents and methods assessed.

He saw the gendarmes leave and hand over his computers to a man in plain clothes in a car nearby.

Days later, his bank accounts and credit cards were suddenly blocked by an authority whose identity was not revealed to him. His pensions were also blocked.

Fourtillan had been summoned to a hearing in the lawsuit concerning his valentonin "treatment" on December 4 in Paris. He did not go, invoking the fact that he now had no way of paying for a train ticket to the French capital.

This information was given to LifeSite by a person who works with Fourtillan on the website http://verite-covid19.com/ and who knows him well — well enough to state that he "is certainly not insane," having spent time with him recently.

Six days later, on Thursday morning, gendarmes once more came to Fourtillan's home and asked him to accompany them in order to answer questions about his refusal to join the December 4 hearing in Paris.

Fourtillan agreed readily.

However, from the moment he left his home with the law enforcement officers, he was not able to communicate with his family. One of his lawyers, Marc Fribourg — who has since gone on record saying that Fourtillan is a "conspiracy theorist" — revealed that he was taken to the Uzès psychiatric hospital of Le Mas Careiron, where he has been held since. His other lawyer, who previously commended Fourtillan for the efficiency of his hormonal patches, was not reachable today.

[Hughe]

https://www.worldvaccinepoll.com/

(My answer)

Should Vaccines be Mandatory?
(No)

Are you getting the COVID-19 vaccine?
(No)

Was Gov’t reaction to COVID-19 worse than the virus?
(Yes)

Do you support Lockdowns or Military Involvement?
(No)

Should Masks be mandatory?
(No)

Do you trust the World Health Organization?
(No)

Was COVID-19 politicized by mainstream media?
(Yes)

[greybeard]

Peter Hitchens: From Covid to Culture Wars-The Left's Long March Through UK Institutions is Complete


In the earliest stages of Covid-19, Peter Hitchens was one of the few public voices who was opposed to the lockdown and the tactics that were being employed. As time has proved him correct, he regrets but is not surprised that he has not been afforded greater media exposure during this crisis.

He thinks it absurd that there has been so little proper criticism or opposition to the government's measures and that journalists are so placid in their questioning of ministers. Most of these meausres are neither proportionate nor of much use, yet the public have embraced them wholeheartedly. This he believes is akin to doing things out of supersitition.

The government, he argues, has embarked on the biggest and most expensive propaganda campaign in peacetime, to concince the British public to commit acts of enormous self harm that were wholly disproportionate and unjustifiable in relation to the severity of the pandemic.

He wonders what lies ahead for transport and big cities if people are no longer commuting in to city centres and if office space declines, with all the knock-on effects that will have for businesses that depend on offices and office workers.

He points out that no-one should be surprised by public institutions such as the National Trust and British Library becoming involved in political controversies such as Black Lives Matter. This was always going to be the result once the left had completed its "Long March" through the institutions. The left's silent revolution is a fait accompli, and now they are enacting and reacting in accordance with their ideology.

He explains that much of the current "social justice" and culture war problems we see today originates in the Equalities Act of 2010, an Act brought in by the Labour Government but one which the Conservative Party -- which by this point had become a Blairite Party led by the Blairite David Cameron -- did little to oppose.

"If I were under 30 I'd have left (Britain) long ago", Hitchens states. "I've never seen a country more finished -- and I've seen some finished countries." The problem Britain faces is that with our 2 party system (which Hitchens supports), it is impossible for a new party to rise up until there is a vacancy. This is how the Labour Party emerged to replace the Liberal Party -- and this is the only way that the Conservative Party or Labour Party will in turn be replaced.
---------------


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUhm3_PW3qo

[ExomatrixTV]

400657161378555
source (https://www.facebook.com/johnn.kuhless/videos/400657161378555)

[DaveToo]

Is China vaccinating it's population ?


I've heard absolutely NOTHING to suggest they care a crap about covid .

Norman I've been thinking a lot about China lately too. Actually for months and months.
I haven't done much research but just thinking.

Officially they nipped Covid-19 in the bud way back in April. They were the first nation to impose severe
lockdowns in their country. More than 30 million were locked down in Hubei province, for months.

What has actually been going on in China is anyone's guess but I do have a few snippets of info.
Air traffic has been absolutely crazy in the country since way back in April. No slowdown there.

I just read an ex-pat article giving a rundown of what's going on in Wuhan now.
They say life is pretty much back to normal there. People do still wear masks, but they traditionally
have especially in cities as polluted as Wuhan.

So here's the thing.
Our good friend Mr. Gates is going to have to get out his pencil and trusty calculator and redo
some calculations.
He was planning on vaccinating the world which is currently around 7.8 billion.
China has a population currently around 1.4 billion.
Let's see if I still remember some basic math:

7.8 billion - 1.4 billion = 6.4 billion

Why would China bother to vaccinate 1.4 billion people seeing as they essentially eradicated
the virus way back in April? That would seem like a pretty silly thing to do.
If people aren't getting sick without the vaccine how would vaccinating 1.4 billion people help the country?

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 14th December 2020


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZZuYoezxpc

[rgray222]

Australia Scraps Covid-19 Vaccine That Produced H.I.V. False Positives

Australia on Friday canceled a roughly $750 million plan for a large order of a locally developed coronavirus vaccine after the inoculation produced false positive test results for H.I.V. in some volunteers participating in a trial study.

Of the dozens of coronavirus vaccines being tested worldwide, the Australian one was the first to be abandoned. While its developers said the experimental vaccine had appeared to be safe and effective, the false positives risked undermining trust in the effort to vaccinate the public.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Friday said that his government would compensate for the loss of 51 million doses it had planned to buy from the Australian consortium in part by increasing orders of vaccines made by AstraZeneca and Novavax. The government has said it plans to begin inoculating citizens by March.

“We can’t have any issues with confidence,” he told reporters, “and we are as a nation now, with a good portfolio of vaccines, able to make these decisions to best protect the Australian people.”

The Australian setback showed the missteps that can inevitably occur when scientists, during a pandemic that has killed more than 1.5 million people, rush to condense the usual yearslong process to develop vaccines into a matter of months.

But just as the Australian scientists made their announcement, the fruits of that race became clearer. The United States moved a step closer to issuing its first approval for a Covid-19 vaccine, as a panel of experts who advise the Food and Drug Administration endorsed a Pfizer vaccine that is already in use in Britain.

The trouble that arose with the Australian vaccine, developed by the University of Queensland and the biotech company CSL, was related to its use of two fragments of a protein found in H.I.V.

The protein formed part of a molecular “clamp” that researchers placed on the spikes that surround the coronavirus and allow it to enter healthy cells. The clamp stabilizes the spikes, allowing the immune system to respond more effectively to the vaccine.

The use of the H.I.V. protein posed no risk of infecting the volunteers with that virus, the researchers said. But the clamp generated the production of antibodies recognized by H.I.V. tests at higher levels than the scientists had expected.

Editors’ Picks

What’s Fauci Reading? We Take Another Look at Celebrity Bookshelves

17 Virtual Tours of New York City

Here’s Why Vaccinated People Still Need to Wear a Mask
Continue reading the main story
Because H.I.V. tests could not be rapidly re-engineered to account for this, the researchers decided to abandon the development of the vaccine. Proceeding could have led to widespread anxiety among Australians that the vaccine could cause AIDS.

Early experiments on hamsters showed that the vaccine protected them from the coronavirus. When Phase 1 trials on humans began in July, the 216 volunteers were “fully informed of the possibility of a partial immune response” to the clamp, the University of Queensland and CSL said in a statement on Friday.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/11/world/australia/uq-coronavirus-vaccine-false-positive.html

[Eva2]

'World’s biggest vaccine company sues COVID shot volunteer who spoke about negative side effects
The man’s wife told local media that he began vomiting and complaining of a pounding headache ten days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine'


https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gates-foundation-backed-covid-vaccine-maker-sues-trial-volunteer-alleging-brain-damage?fbclid=IwAR0IZ2D3yqLtrymu02IOzxOXCG7Q-RhpjZbPNMfxZRgxr891PJxpXJTKckA

[Philippe]

Is China vaccinating it's population ?


I've heard absolutely NOTHING to suggest they care a crap about covid .

Norman I've been thinking a lot about China lately too. Actually for months and months.
I haven't done much research but just thinking.

Officially they nipped Covid-19 in the bud way back in April. They were the first nation to impose severe
lockdowns in their country. More than 30 million were locked down in Hubei province, for months.

What has actually been going on in China is anyone's guess but I do have a few snippets of info.
Air traffic has been absolutely crazy in the country since way back in April. No slowdown there.

I just read an ex-pat article giving a rundown of what's going on in Wuhan now.
They say life is pretty much back to normal there. People do still wear masks, but they traditionally
have especially in cities as polluted as Wuhan.

So here's the thing.
Our good friend Mr. Gates is going to have to get out his pencil and trusty calculator and redo
some calculations.
He was planning on vaccinating the world which is currently around 7.8 billion.
China has a population currently around 1.4 billion.
Let's see if I still remember some basic math:

7.8 billion - 1.4 billion = 6.4 billion

Why would China bother to vaccinate 1.4 billion people seeing as they essentially eradicated
the virus way back in April? That would seem like a pretty silly thing to do.
If people aren't getting sick without the vaccine how would vaccinating 1.4 billion people help the country?

It looks like the world has been fooled by the Chinese and we have lost valuable time here discussing the virus.
( I lost a link that says the footage of persons in Wuhan falling dead may have been staged)

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-13-communist-china-infiltrated-vaccine-giants-pfizer-astrazeneca-glaxosmithkline.html

[thepainterdoug]

I remember the 3 fear items that convinced me of the seriousness of covid when i first heard about it.

1 the people dropping over from China

2 the food shortage lines of all the cars bumper to bumper i think in Texas

3 Near NYC, the mass graves with coffins being buried.

probably all fake

d

[yuhui]

Is China vaccinating it's population ?


I've heard absolutely NOTHING to suggest they care a crap about covid .

I don't think it's true.


Why would China bother to vaccinate 1.4 billion people seeing as they essentially eradicated
the virus way back in April? That would seem like a pretty silly thing to do.
If people aren't getting sick without the vaccine how would vaccinating 1.4 billion people help the country?

Because it's not eradicated. There are still cases due to international travel and frozen food.
The vaccination has already started in China few months ago, and the vaccines are produced by national pharmaceutical companies.
https://www.vox.com/2020/11/25/21612338/does-china-have-a-covid-19-vaccine-1-million-sinopharm-sinovac

[One]

I was informed today by my better half, that the UK jab didn't prevent the spread of the disease? So my immediate thought was, that if that was so, then the case for mandating it for work or travel etc becomes mute surely?

I wondered if that was really the case and did a quick check. I could see that a few of the main stream propaganda outlets such as below, were stating as such.

So for people concerned about forced vaccine esp in the UK, I feel they are going to have a hard time justifying it. On top of that, I think there are a lot of people (including many that would normally take them), who are just going to do the maths and decide it isn't worth the risk. I think it is going to be a struggle to mandate, and when combined with the interesting events going on elsewhere in the world, may very likely come to nothing.

That's assuming that the rumours that this is all a bluff anyway (and nobody has managed to produce a proper vaccine) aren't true.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/12/vaccine-passports-make-no-sense-covid-jabs-dont-stop-spreading/ (subscription needed)
Until we know for sure whether the vaccines stop transmission, it’s best to leave the passport idea to science fiction writers

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03441-8
But none has demonstrated that it prevents infection altogether, or reduces the spread of the virus in a population. This leaves open the chance that those who are vaccinated could remain susceptible to asymptomatic infection — and could transmit that infection to others who remain vulnerable. “In the worst-case scenario, you have people walking around feeling fine, but shedding virus everywhere,” says virologist Stephen Griffin at the University of Leeds, UK.

Am sure there are more articles..

[DaveToo]

Is China vaccinating it's population ?


I've heard absolutely NOTHING to suggest they care a crap about covid .

I don't think it's true.


Why would China bother to vaccinate 1.4 billion people seeing as they essentially eradicated
the virus way back in April? That would seem like a pretty silly thing to do.
If people aren't getting sick without the vaccine how would vaccinating 1.4 billion people help the country?

Because it's not eradicated. There are still cases due to international travel and frozen food.
The vaccination has already started in China few months ago, and the vaccines are produced by national pharmaceutical companies.
https://www.vox.com/2020/11/25/21612338/does-china-have-a-covid-19-vaccine-1-million-sinopharm-sinovac

So Bill Gates and his Big Pharma cronies won't get their cut from China?
That's a lot of lost revenue. :)

From the article link you gave yuhui:

"Some experts question the logic behind such an early rollout of mass vaccinations in a place where transmission of the virus is so low. “As one of the safest places in terms of Covid-19, it doesn’t really justify the widespread use of the vaccine in the country,” Huang said."

Those experts are thinking along the same lines as I am.

Western Big Pharma will likely be furious that China has made deals with Brazil and Turkey for millions of doses.

[norman]

Sarah Westall - They Do Not Want you to Know This: Guarded Medical Knowledge w/ Dr. Andreas Klacker (https://podbay.fm/p/business-game-changers/e/1608001211)
Show notes
Dr. Andreas Kalcker has over 13 years of research & developing a safe and widely used (yet still a heavily guarded secret) formula of CDS (Chlorine dioxide solution). After successful stage 3 trials, he is able to announce that it is the definitive solution for the Coronavirus family including COVID-19, bacterial Pneumonias, and other illnesses. Also CDS has no negative side effects, which has been fully demonstrated in their international multi-center clinical trials and by over 3000 Doctors on over 20,000 people in more than 24 countries.
See more of his work at AndreasKalcker.com (https://andreaskalcker.com/en/) and doctors and medical professionals can learn more by joining 60,000 other professionals on the international forum Comusav (https://comusav.com/)

[pueblo]

Excellent article.

COVID-19 Un-Explained

LARRY ROMANOFF • DECEMBER 14, 2020 • 8,600 WORDS

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/covid-19-un-explained/

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 16th December 2020



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6qPp3g7Qj4

[ExomatrixTV]

Exposing The Hysteria & Hypocrisy:
yAMKrtJw-i8

[onawah]

Biggest Conspiracy Behind COVID Now Proven
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
12/16/20
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/16/covid-conspiracy.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20201216_HL2&mid=DM749013&rid=1036123263

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In a February 18, 2020, scientific statement in The Lancet, 27 authors strongly condemned conspiracy theories suggesting COVID-19 does not have a natural origin, stating that scientists from around the world “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife”
Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) prove EcoHealth Alliance employees were behind the plot to obscure the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 by issuing a scientific statement condemning such inquiries as “conspiracy theory”
EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted The Lancet statement, intending it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”
Several of the authors of that Lancet statement also have direct ties to the EcoHealth Alliance that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest
Daszak is now leading The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission charged with getting to the bottom of SARS-CoV-2’s origin — a role for which he is clearly too conflicted to perform in an unbiased manner

November 5, 2020, U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), an investigative public health nonprofit group, filed a lawsuit1 against the National Institutes of Health after the agency failed to respond to its July 10, 2020, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

The USRTK’s lawsuit sought access to nonexempt records of gain-of-function experiments relating to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as the EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute.2

In a November 18, 2020, article,3,4 USRTK reports that emails obtained prove EcoHealth Alliance employees were behind the plot to obscure the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 by issuing a scientific statement condemning such inquiries as “conspiracy theory”:

“Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show that a statement5 in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning ‘conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin’ was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The emails obtained via public records requests show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to ‘not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person’6 but rather to be seen as ‘simply a letter from leading scientists.’7 Daszak wrote that he wanted ‘to avoid the appearance of a political statement.’8

The scientists’ letter appeared in The Lancet on February 18, just one week after the World Health Organization announced that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus would be named COVID-19.

The 27 authors ‘strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,’ and reported that scientists from multiple countries ‘overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.’

The letter included no scientific references to refute a lab-origin theory of the virus. One scientist, Linda Saif, asked via email whether it would be useful ‘to add just one or 2 statements in support of why nCOV is not a lab generated virus and is naturally occuring? Seems critical to scientifically refute such claims!’9 Daszak responded, ‘I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.’10”

USRTK points out that several of the authors of that Lancet statement also have direct ties to the EcoHealth Alliance that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest.

“Rita Colwell and James Hughes are members of the Board of Directors of EcoHealth Alliance, William Karesh is the group’s Executive Vice President for Health and Policy, and Hume Field is Science and Policy Advisor,” USRTK writes.11

Daszak Leads Lancet Investigation Into SARS-CoV-2 Origin
This bombshell finding is all the more important in light of the fact that Daszak is now leading The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission charged with getting to the bottom of SARS-CoV-2’s origin.12

The nomination was suspect from the start, for no other reason than EcoHealth Alliance has received numerous grants from the National Institutes of Health for coronavirus research that was then subcontracted to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Daszak had also gone on the record stating he’s convinced that the virus is natural in origin. With that, his conflicts of interest were already crystal clear, but the finding that he orchestrated The Lancet statement condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” means The Lancet Commission’s investigation is little more than a cover-up operation.

If they want to maintain any semblance of credibility going forward, Daszak would need to be replaced with someone less tainted by conflicts and personal gain potential. Five other members of The Lancet Commission also signed the February 18, 2020, statement in The Lancet,13 which puts their credibility in question as well.

Daszak has every reason to make sure SARS-CoV-2 ends up being declared natural, because if it turns out to be a lab-creation, his livelihood is at stake. It would be naïve to believe that safeguarding the continuation of dangerous gain-of-function research wouldn’t be a powerful motivator to preserve the zoonotic origin narrative.

If you want to see just how deeply the mainstream media is in complete collusion with Daszak and is being used to bolster this fake narrative, you can view the “60 Minutes” interview with him below that was broadcast earlier this year.

ziiJZ3FiPTA

Lab Escapes Are Commonplace
For the past decade, there have been red flags raised in the scientific community about biosecurity breaches in high containment biological labs in the U.S. and around the world.14

There were legitimate fears that a lab-created superflu might escape the confines of biosecurity labs where researchers are conducting experiments. It’s certainly a reasonable fear, considering the many biosafety breaches on record.15,16,17,18 For example, in 2014, six glass vials of smallpox virus were accidentally found in a storeroom in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s lab at the National Institutes of Health.19

It was the second time in one month mishandling of potential deadly infectious agents was exposed. One month before this shocking discovery, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention20 realized as many as 84, and possibly 86, of its scientists had been exposed to live anthrax.21,22

The live pathogen had been sent from another, higher-security facility, which failed to follow biosafety protocols. The anthrax sample was supposed to have been inactivated prior to transfer, but for a variety of reasons it wasn’t dead on arrival.

The next year, in 2015, the Pentagon realized a Dugway Proving Ground laboratory had been sending incompletely inactivated anthrax (meaning it was still live) to 200 laboratories around the world for the past 12 years. According to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report23 issued in August 2016, incompletely inactivated anthrax was sent out on at least 21 occasions between 2003 and 2015.

In 2017, the BSL 4 lab on Galveston Island was hit by a massive storm and severe flooding, raising questions about what might happen were some of the pathogens kept there to get out.24 As recently as 2019, the BSL 4 lab in Fort Detrick was temporarily shut down after several protocol violations were noted.25

Between October 2014 and December 2017, a moratorium on dangerous gain-of-function experiments was in effect in the U.S.26,27 The moratorium was initially issued after a rash of “high-profile lab mishaps” at the CDC and “extremely controversial flu experiments” in which the bird flu virus was engineered to become more lethal and contagious between ferrets.

The goal was to see if it could mutate and become more lethal and contagious between humans, causing future pandemics.

According to Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the West Africa Ebola pandemic likely originated out of a BSL-4 facility in Sierra Leone. He believes they were testing a live Ebola vaccine, thereby causing the outbreak.

Asia Times28 lists several other examples of safety breaches at BSL3 and BSL4 labs, as does a May 28, 2015, article in USA Today,29 an April 11, 2014, article in Slate magazine30 and a November 16, 2020, article in Medium.31

SARS Lab Escapes
The Medium article,32 written by Gilles Demaneuf, reviews SARS lab escapes specifically. No less than three out of four reappearances of SARS have been attributed to safety breaches. In the first incident, which took place in September 2003 in Singapore, an inexperienced doctoral student was infected with SARS. The case was blamed on “inappropriate laboratory standards” and cross-contamination.33

Other shortcomings that contributed included “inadequate record-keeping procedures, totally inadequate training, inexistent virus stock inventory, patchy maintenance records plus a variety of structural problems including the absence of gauges to indicate the pressure differentials, the lack of a freezer to store samples, problems with HEPA filters and air supply, and other equipment deficiencies.”34

As long as we are creating the risk, the benefit will always be secondary. Any scientific or medical gains made from gain-of-function research pales in comparison to the incredible risks involved if these creations are released.
The second accident took place in December 2003 at the Level 4 lab at the Taiwan Military Institute of Preventive Medical Research (IPMR) of the National Defense University.

A lieutenant-colonel working with SARS was infected as a result of negligence when disinfecting an accidental spill. The third incidence took place between February and April 2004 in Beijing, resulting in nearly 1,000 people being medically quarantined.

Why Tracking Down Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Is Crucial
As noted by the National Review,35 getting to the bottom of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial if we are to prevent a similar pandemic to erupt in the future:

“If it originated from a person eating bat or pangolin at a wet market, then we need to take steps to ensure that bat and pangolin consumption and trade stops everywhere in the world … Bat guano is used as fertilizer in many countries, and that guano can be full of viruses … If this is the source of the virus, we need to get people to stop going into caves and using the guano as fertilizer …

In a strange way, the ‘lab accident’ scenario is one of the most reassuring explanations. It means that if we want to ensure we never experience this again, we simply need to get every lab in the world working on contagious viruses to ensure 100 percent compliance with safety protocols, all the time.”

We’re told gain-of-function research is necessary in order to stay ahead of the natural evolution of viruses. A pathogen that mutates and jumps species, for example, may end up posing a severe threat to mankind. However, by manipulating pathogens, turning nonlethal viruses into lethal ones, for example, we are creating the very risk we’re supposedly trying to avoid.

And, as long as we are creating the risk, the benefit will always be secondary. Any scientific or medical gains made from this kind of research pales in comparison to the incredible risks involved if these creations are released. This sentiment has been echoed by others in a variety of scientific publications.36,37,38,39

Considering the potential for a massively lethal pandemic, I believe it’s safe to say that BSL 3 and 4 laboratories pose a very real and serious existential threat to humanity.

U.S. biowarfare programs employ some 13,000 scientists,40 all of whom are hard at work creating ever-deadlier pathogens, while the public is simply told to trust that these pathogens will never be released, either involuntarily or voluntarily.

Historical facts tell us accidental exposures and releases have already happened, and we only have our lucky stars to thank that none have turned into pandemics taking the lives of millions.

Considering safety breaches at these labs number in the hundreds, it’s only a matter of time before something really nasty gets out. Consider the ramifications if a souped-up Ebola or Spanish flu were to get out, for example. Is SARS-CoV-2 the product of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? It might be. There’s certainly compelling evidence to suggest it.

But even if such suspicions turn out be wrong, we must ask the question and do a proper investigation. We absolutely need to know how this virus came about, and if it was a lab creation, how it got out.

Naturally, there will be resistance. As mentioned, many thousands of researchers stand to lose their careers were this kind of research to be banned. As Antonio Regalado, biomedicine editor of MIT Technology Review, told Boston Magazine,41 “If it turned out COVID-19 came from a lab it would shatter the scientific edifice top to bottom.”

Some might be looking at an even worse fate. With sufficient evidence, certain researchers and public health authorities could face life behind bars for their involvement, which is the penalty for bioterrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act. All things considered, there’s virtually no benefit to gain-of-function research, but plenty of risk."

+ Sources and References
1 US District Court for the District of Columbia Case No. 20-cv-3196 (PDF)
2 USRTK.org November 5, 2020
3, 11 USRTK November 18, 2020
4 GM Watch November 19, 2020
5 The Lancet March 7, 2020; 395(10226): E42-E43
6, 9, 10 USRTK Email February 6, 2020
7, 8 USRTK Email February 8, 2020
12 EcoHealth Alliance November 23, 2020
13 Twitter Alina Chan November 23, 2020
14 Institute of Medicine. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories 2011.
15 The Guardian December 4, 2014
16 CIDRAP July 1, 2016
17 Reuters February 15, 2012
18 CIDRAP June 20, 2014
19 New York Times, July 9, 2014
20 New York Times, June 20, 2014
21 Popular Mechanics July 31, 2014
22 Reuters June 21, 2014
23 GAO.gov August 2016, High-Containment Laboratories Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate Risk (PDF)
24 Consortium News August 30, 2017
25 WJLA January 22, 2020
26 NPR November 7, 2014
27 New York Times December 19, 2017 (Archived)
28 Asia Times April 6, 2020
29 USA Today May 28, 2015
30 Slate April 11, 2014
31, 32, 33, 34 Medium November 16, 2020
35 National Review April 16, 2020
36 mBio 2012 Sep-Oct; 3(5): e00360-12
37 The Human Fatality Burden of Gain of Function Flu Research: A Risk Assessment by Lynn Klotz (PDF)
38 BMC Medicine 2013; 11, Article number 252
39 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists February 25, 2019
40 Scoop February 26, 2020
41 Boston Magazine September 9, 2020

[ExomatrixTV]

"Preparing for Pandemic"


World Economic Forum issues a white paper in conjunction with Harvard Global Heath, January 18, 2019, “Outbreak Readiness and Business Impact: Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global Economy (https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/outbreak-readiness-and-business-impact-protecting-lives-and-livelihoods-across-the-global-economy)“, declaring epidemic outbreaks as great a business risk as “climate change”;



China’s new vaccine law (https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/china-vaccine-law-passed/), passed June 29, 2019, which mandates vaccinations for all starting on December 1, 2019 and modernizes vaccine production (https://www.cms-china.info/insight/2019/09_Lifesciences_NL/Newsletter_Lifesciences.html);



President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-united-states-promote-national-security-public-health/) on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and



Event 201 (http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html), the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players (http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/players/gao.html) in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.



Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/TheOptimist/coronavirus) throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7951293/Bill-Gates-Predicted-Coronavirus-Like-Outbreak-2019-Netflix-Documentary.html) called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” (https://www.foxnews.com/tech/bill-gates-stepping-down-microsoft-board-focus-on-philanthropic-priorities) from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study (https://seattleflu.org/scan), which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.

The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.

Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship (https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/founders-statement-regarding-censorship-efforts-de-platform-greenmedinfo-other-he?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Sayer%20and%20Zach%20Vorhies%20%28Google%20Whistleblower%29% 20%28NNNPeh%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20List&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJhdmVuZXNreUBodXNobWFpbC5jb20iLCAia2xfY29tcGFueV9pZCI6ICJLMnZYQXkifQ%3D%3D) and mandatory vaccine legislation (https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx) also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued (https://www.theepochtimes.com/physicians-association-sues-rep-adam-schiff-for-vaccine-censorship_3220485.html) by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” (https://www.vox.com/technology/2018/3/6/17071750/amazon-health-care-apple-google-uber) already.

Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.

Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act (https://www.engadget.com/2020/03/05/earn-it-act-section-230/) that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.

These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.

Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.

Investigative journalist Harry Vox filmed 2014
wuOxG-rnj30


source (https://principia-scientific.com/2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-2020-lockdown)

Written by James Fetzer
https://i0.wp.com/principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ftftft-1.jpg?resize=519%2C550&ssl=1

In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.

The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Business_Network) (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”

These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schwartz_(futurist)), Stewart Brand (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Brand), both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy (https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/global-spread-individualism), an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.



The Narrative: “Lock Step”

https://therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/cover-rockefeller-scenarios-2.png?w=901&resize=312%2C355 (http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf)


Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development (http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf)”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.

The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.

There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”


Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:

https://therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/rockefeller-scenario-outcomes-chart.png?w=1024

Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?

These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s [I]Contagion. (Check out the trailer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sYSyuuLk5g) if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.

It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News (https://www.mintpressnews.com/kushner-family-getting-very-rich-thanks-to-coronavirus/265914/), Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA. (https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fksnbf/im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill_melinda_gates/)

Mainstream Media Follows The Script

https://i0.wp.com/principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/mmmm-1.jpg?resize=550%2C298&ssl=1

Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.

New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=293&v=e3gCbkeARbY&feature=emb_logo) ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress (https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-17/china-coronavirus-covid-19-mental-health/) disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested (https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-china-protests-wuhan-environment-20190704-story.html) despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law (https://bit.ly/39hAduO)” and performs “syndromic surveillance (https://www.cdc.gov/nssp/overview.html#CoP),”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.


source (https://principia-scientific.com/2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-2020-lockdown)

[ExomatrixTV]

100,000 Doctors & Medical Professionals Oppose COVID-19 Vaccine

Published on December 16, 2020
https://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cc-3.jpg?resize=550%2C311&ssl=1

Doctors are now uniting against the pre planned and fabricated plandemic, which is quickly turning into a full genocidal push across the world.

Over 100,000 doctors and various health professionals have now united against the government planned genocide, with the pharmaceutical giants ready to start the slaughter in the long term care homes via an untested vaccine that purposely skipped animal trials.

The uninformed public is also targeted first and foremost, simply believing the government would never lie to them. The government is more than lying and these health professionals go on the record to document the government and media lies.

As the vaccine is set to kill and cripple the seniors and the uninformed in the first wave of genocide, their vaccine induced deaths and disease states will be used as the excuse to force the vaccine on everyone else, as the evil media and corrupt government will simply re-label the medical genocide as COVID-19 or something more deadly than COVID. This has been the plan the entire time.

You have a choice to make. You can face this evil or be consumed by it, there is no third option. Most people were purposely sent to government brain washing camps called “schools” where they were inserted with pro government brain washing mind control programming. This will make them unable to process what is happening and it will paralyze them from taking action. They will fall quickly.

You’ll need to decide if you will take action or simply be nudged inch by inch into the abattoir by peer pressure, paid government bullies, propaganda and a trail of safety bread crumbs…that lead right off a cliff.

There is no pandemic, the governments are faking the death counts (simply placing all deaths in the fabricated COVID category), all the governments are using a fraudulent RT-PCR machine to mark healthy people as infected (therefore driving a fear based case-demic of people who aren’t ill) plus the vaccine is designed to kill, cripple and/or cause infertility. Spread this video far and wide as these doctors and health professionals sound the alarm. This video has already been banned on Facebook and YouTube and is being denounced by media all over the world.

This video was produced by the team at Oracle Films and an INCREDIBLE line-up of brave, scientific and medical experts from around the world. With the COVID-19 Vaccine rollout beginning next week, we ask the one question on everybody’s minds.


source (https://principia-scientific.com/100000-doctors-medical-professionals-oppose-covid-19-vaccine/)

[greybeard]

Dr Vernon Coleman
Is this the last Christmas


https://brandnewtube.com/watch/is-this-the-last-christmas-they-039-ll-let-us-have_HKmeZPHAV9BDihS.html

[ExomatrixTV]

The Republican Party Slides Further: What's A Solution?:
sFVJR9kdJ74

[norman]

To Your Good Health Radio - Vaccine Regulation and More on the Pandemic - Robert F. Kennedy Jr (https://podbay.fm/p/to-your-good-health-radio/e/1608188400)
Show notes
It's really difficult to know who to trust in this pandemic when it feels like everyone is using a different version of "science" to back their theories. Our guest today, Robert F. Kennedy Jr shares these same frustrations, and it on a mission to pull back the curtain and expose the truth. He is an attorney, author, and humanitarian and environmental activist. Robert serves as President of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense. Listen as Robert & Dr. Friedman talk about vaccine regulation, issues with the forthcoming COVID-19 vaccines, the problem with lockdowns, and how COVID-19 isn't that big a deal.

[Did You See Them]

Here is a hypothetical question.

If society divides in to two, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, how will blood donations and organ transplants work going forward ?

[norman]

Here is a hypothetical question.

If society divides in to two, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, how will blood donations and organ transplants work going forward ?

It gets worse than that, if we don't stop it. When society is fully divided they will have 2 different groups to 'treat' completely differently (the social credit score will play a huge part in this). The Stockholm Syndrome ass kissing group will get free stuff and programing. The rebels will get cyanide gassed, or some other unfortunate accidental disaster.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... propaganda for a very safe non-inoculation:

1339245157208748032

... considering the length of the needle, this looks like a bone injection...

[ExomatrixTV]

Mysterious Death of Vaccine Safety Advocate Brandy Vaughn, + C0VlD Censorship with Dr. Scott Jensen
ALUCDYM5g-c

[pueblo]

...

... propaganda for a very safe non-inoculation:

1339245157208748032

... considering the length of the needle, this looks like a bone injection...


Not 100% sure on this but I think retractable needles (for safety) are an actual thing.

[Gwin Ru]

[...]
Not 100% sure on this but I think retractable needles (for safety) are an actual thing.Sorry, I should have added to my last comment... because if that wasn't a retractable needle and planted to the hilt on the guy's shoulder, then it's not a muscle inoculation but a bone stabbing...

[Eva2]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORBcAc8ip6I

[Eric J (Viking)]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORBcAc8ip6I


More here on this story...

http://82.221.129.208/.ux5.html

Viking

[ExomatrixTV]

THIS is a HUGE decision:

b5qj0chJOtk

[greybeard]

UK Column News Christmas Special Review of the Year


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRnwAtHFqY0

Go to 7.30 minutes Chris

[ExomatrixTV]

Apology Satire & Sarcasm for Facebook:

PTPreIUN2g0

[ExomatrixTV]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.

ORBcAc8ip6I

[Olam]

At last!...WHO just posted the FACT that high cycle thresholds for a covid test DO cause false positives.

See here:https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users

I can show this to my family and friends and watch them gasping at the truth we knew all along.

[greybeard]

Police will make 'no apology' for enforcing new Christmas Day lockdown rules

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/police-adopt-light-touch-enforcing-180101597.html

Police have said they will make "no apology" for enforcing new Christmas Day lockdown rules.

Scotland Yard has said that officers across London will pay particular attention to groups who have wilfully ignored the rules with patrols prioritised in high footfall areas of the capital.

It came as five police officers were injured and 29 people arrested following anti-lockdown protests in central London.

Hundreds of people joined marches down Oxford and Regent Street on Saturday, and were dispersed several times by police.

The Metropolitan Police Force said that teams will continue to engage first, hoping to explain the rules to Londoners.

Ministers had hoped the seismic shift on rules for the festive period would not require police to adopt heavy-handed tactics in the new Tier 4 areas.

Asked how the latest changes would be enforced, one government official said: “The police are not going to enforce Christmas Day very heavily.”

Another added: “The law is there to provide clarity and certainty. I don’t think you would expect to see police pulling over cars to check where people are going. What we have seen so far is that overwhelmingly people want to do the right thing and follow the rules.”

But Met commander Alex Murray, said: “Our fight against the virus is not over. The rules are very clear and our collective actions in the next two weeks will have a direct impact on how quickly our city will recover. If people ignore these new rules, make reckless decisions that risk lives, I make no apology for the subsequent enforcement action that will follow.”

Extra police officers will also be deployed on the streets over New Year to break up any revellers.

Speaking at the Downing Street press conference on Saturday, the Prime Minister praised police for having done an “amazing job” by adopting a “light touch” approach when enforcing social distancing rules.

A Home Office spokesman said: “The police have done an incredible job throughout the pandemic. We fully expect the majority of people to do the right thing and to comply with these new restrictions. Where necessary, the police will continue to issue fines. We are working with the College of Policing and National Police Chiefs’ Council on updated guidance for the police.”

Paul Scully, the small business minister who chairs the Government’s hospitality taskforce, is co-ordinating meetings on New Year policing with pubs and restaurant operators.

"The usual lies Thousands demonstrated not just a few --Hundreds arrested brutally -- women thrown to the ground sat on handcuffed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgjDebTiqt4

[pueblo]

Here is a hypothetical question.

If society divides in to two, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, how will blood donations and organ transplants work going forward ?

It gets worse than that, if we don't stop it. When society is fully divided they will have 2 different groups to 'treat' completely differently (the social credit score will play a huge part in this). The Stockholm Syndrome ass kissing group will get free stuff and programing. The rebels will get cyanide gassed, or some other unfortunate accidental disaster.

And hasn't that been the plan from the beginning?

The unvaccinated (without their social credit score covid passes) will be as plainly visible as if they were wearing a gold star pinned to their chest...

[Tintin]

For anyone outside the UK who is a little out of step with events here, the UK government announced (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgHjC2l9feA) the introduction of a harsher Tier 4 (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tier-4-stay-at-home) level of restrictions which were mooted by Dominic Raab (UK Foreign Secretary) some months ago and have now been implemented. There are echoes (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/20/police-to-stop-people-fleeing-new-covid-tier-4-areas-hancock-says) of the Victoria State (Australia) model to be noted here.

They have been introduced in response to what appears to be a bonafide concern about a 'new variant'.

Those of us who have been closely trying to keep up with the science will already have been made aware of the D614G variant identified back in late spring.

This paper appears to be the one that may have been the basis of the evidence provided to government:

https://virological.org/t/preliminary-genomic-characterisation-of-an-emergent-sars-cov-2-lineage-in-the-uk-defined-by-a-novel-set-of-spike-mutations/563

Preliminary genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in the UK defined by a novel set of spike mutations
Report written by: Andrew Rambaut1, Nick Loman2, Oliver Pybus3, Wendy Barclay4, Jeff Barrett5, Alesandro Carabelli6, Tom Connor7, Tom Peacock4, David L Robertson8, Erik Volz4, on behalf of COVID-19 Genomics Consortium UK (CoG-UK)9.



1.University of Edinburgh
2.University of Birmingham
3.University of Oxford
4.Imperial College London
5.Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
6.University of Cambridge
7.Cardiff University
8.MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research
9.https://www.cogconsortium.uk 246


Summary
Recently a distinct phylogenetic cluster (named lineage B.1.1.7) was detected within the COG-UK surveillance dataset. This cluster has been growing rapidly over the past 4 weeks and since been observed in other UK locations, indicating further spread.

Several aspects of this cluster are noteworthy for epidemiological and biological reasons and we report preliminary findings below. In summary:

The B.1.1.7 lineage accounts for an increasing proportion of cases in parts of England. The number of B.1.1.7 cases, and the number of regions reporting B.1.1.7 infections, are growing.

B.1.1.7 has an unusually large number of genetic changes, particularly in the spike protein.

Three of these mutations have potential biological effects that have been described previously to varying extents:



- Mutation N501Y is one of six key contact residues within the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and has been identified as increasing binding affinity to human and murine ACE2.
- The spike deletion 69-70del has been described in the context of evasion to the human immune response but has also occurred a number of times in association with other RBD changes.
- Mutation P681H is immediately adjacent to the furin cleavage site, a known location of biological significance.

The rapid growth of this lineage indicates the need for enhanced genomic and epidemiological surveillance worldwide and laboratory investigations of antigenicity and infectivity.

[Eric J (Viking)]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.

ORBcAc8ip6I

Very sad news if true....anyone

Copied from link
NO FEAR LIFE 4 hrs · Tiffany Dover ~ the nurse who got the and collapsed has apparently died Any info on this ? BREAKING There are reports Tiffany Pontes Dover is dead. She is the nurse who collapsed on live television when being interviewed about the vaccine. We can’t confirm it, we are trying to collect as much intel as possible. INTEL WE KNOW – She is from Tennessee – She collapsed 15+ minutes after taking the Pfizer vaccine on live television – Her Instagram account is tiffany_dover_ and her Facebook is https://www.facebook.com/tiffany.dover.520/ She hasn’t posted for 5 days, she generally posts every 2-3 days. Go look at the comments on her first photo on her Instagram. – There is social media posts about her death from people who were allegedly connected to her or her family – There is reports of death threats against her family for sharing the info – There is reports of censorship – The debunkers are saying it is all false but are providing very little evidence

Viking

[pueblo]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.

ORBcAc8ip6I


Very sad news if true....anyone

Copied from link
NO FEAR LIFE 4 hrs · Tiffany Dover ~ the nurse who got the and collapsed has apparently died Any info on this ? BREAKING There are reports Tiffany Pontes Dover is dead. She is the nurse who collapsed on live television when being interviewed about the vaccine. We can’t confirm it, we are trying to collect as much intel as possible. INTEL WE KNOW – She is from Tennessee – She collapsed 15+ minutes after taking the Pfizer vaccine on live television – Her Instagram account is tiffany_dover_ and her Facebook is https://www.facebook.com/tiffany.dover.520/ She hasn’t posted for 5 days, she generally posts every 2-3 days. Go look at the comments on her first photo on her Instagram. – There is social media posts about her death from people who were allegedly connected to her or her family – There is reports of death threats against her family for sharing the info – There is reports of censorship – The debunkers are saying it is all false but are providing very little evidence

Viking

The video is in Italian, but the death certs and records he shows are in English.

UDXb_Ng4mcg

[Eric J (Viking)]

Nurse collapses on live television shortly after receiving COVID vaccine. Bet it will be reported as exhaustion for having to work long hours with COVID patients.

ORBcAc8ip6I


Very sad news if true....anyone

Copied from link
NO FEAR LIFE 4 hrs · Tiffany Dover ~ the nurse who got the and collapsed has apparently died Any info on this ? BREAKING There are reports Tiffany Pontes Dover is dead. She is the nurse who collapsed on live television when being interviewed about the vaccine. We can’t confirm it, we are trying to collect as much intel as possible. INTEL WE KNOW – She is from Tennessee – She collapsed 15+ minutes after taking the Pfizer vaccine on live television – Her Instagram account is tiffany_dover_ and her Facebook is https://www.facebook.com/tiffany.dover.520/ She hasn’t posted for 5 days, she generally posts every 2-3 days. Go look at the comments on her first photo on her Instagram. – There is social media posts about her death from people who were allegedly connected to her or her family – There is reports of death threats against her family for sharing the info – There is reports of censorship – The debunkers are saying it is all false but are providing very little evidence

Viking

The video is in Italian, but the death certs and records he shows are in English.

UDXb_Ng4mcg

Found this as well

https://www.bessandloie.com/tiffany-dover-death-2/

Tiffany Dover Death – Online media has been humming with ‘Tiffany Dover dead’ news after the attendant was spotted taking the Pfizer’s immunization live on air.



Numerous individuals have elected to take Pfizer’s antibody, and Tiffany turned out to be one of them. Nonetheless, things went in a new direction for her after she blacked out on live TV. Individuals began scrutinizing the validity of the antibody subsequent to watching Tiffany on TV.

Tiffany Pontes Dover is a Tennessee medical caretaker who had ventured forward to take the COVID-19 immunization before live TV. Tiffany, 30, is likewise a mother of two. She filled in as a supervisor at CHI Memorial Hospital in Chattanooga. Tiffany was among the initial not many staff individuals who ventured up to take Pfizer’s antibody.

In any case, in unforeseen conditions, 17 minutes after she took the immunization, Tiffany swooned. Dread spread among individuals, however she before long picked up awareness. Tiffany clarified she experienced a condition called Vasovagal Syncope. “It just hit me out of nowhere… I feel fine at this point! It’s normal for me,” she guaranteed the watchers after she picked up cognizance.

The specialists additionally demanded that Tiffany was fine and her blacking out had nothing to do with the antibody. “It is a response that can happen regularly with any antibody or shot,” said Dr. Jesse Tucker, Medical Director of basic consideration medication at CHI Memorial. Dr. Exhaust was additionally among the ones who took the antibody.

Since the time Tiffany Dover blacked out on live TV, online media has been humming with the report about her passing. Many rushed to theorize something had happened to her. Despite the fact that she affirmed she was fine, the information on her passing has been fanning out quickly indeed.

Individuals began estimating Tiffany was not well after a few clients overwhelmed web-based media with claimed “evidence” that implied the equivalent. Everything began when individuals shared photos of a supposed authentication that asserted Tiffany had died. It is difficult to state if the testament is genuine. Simultaneously, a few clients affirmed Tiffany, who regularly posted via web-based media, had been missing for two or three days.

Nonetheless, there has been no affirmation made by the family. Simultaneously, no official assertion about her wellbeing has been delivered. As of now, the report about her demise is by all accounts simply one more web-based media buzz that is making adjusts with no authentic proof.

Viking

[DaveToo]

Excellent article.

COVID-19 Un-Explained

LARRY ROMANOFF • DECEMBER 14, 2020 • 8,600 WORDS

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/covid-19-un-explained/

Thanks pueblo.

I would characterize the article as interesting rather than excellent. :)

It certainly takes dead aim at people promoting the terrain theory.
I'd be interested to hear how people such as Jon Rappoport, Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Cowan et al.
respond to the article.

Is it just a coincidence that the author of the article Larry Romanoff happens to be living in China
of all countries in the world?

The article praises China and points a finger at the U.S. for the origins and spread of Covid-19.

[DaveToo]

LARRY ROMANOFF • DECEMBER 14, 2020 • 8,600 WORDS

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/covid-19-un-explained/[/QUOTE]


It's a fairly lengthy article so I will attempt a Cole's Notes version. :)

Romanoff starts off by pointing out the bizarreness of the second and third waves we are seeing with Covid-19.
Historically they are virtually unprecedented, yet not only are we witnessing second and third waves all around the
world, but they were forecasted in advance!!!

Most of the rest of the article focuses on the origins of the virus/pandemic.
Romanoff zeros in on two ground-zeros: The U.S. and Italy.
Italy spreading the virus to the rest of Europe.
U.S. possibly/probably the source of the virus.

Instead of pointing the finger at the Wuhan lab or bat soup, he fingers the Military Games in Wuhan in October 2019.
He references a myriad of reported illnesses by athletes during and after the Games that correlate with Covid symptoms.
His theory is that U.S. athletes brought the virus with them to the Games.

He goes on to list multiple instances around the world of Covid symptoms that occurred throughout 2019, way before
the official outbreak of Covid-19.

He finishes the article with a bleak prognostication for CV and the world:
"Americans need to believe their leaders who tell them life will never return to ‘normal’. It will not."

But strangely, he also mentions that life is pretty much back to normal inside China!

[norman]

BBC - New coronavirus variant: What do we know?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55388846

Why is this variant causing concern?

How much faster is it spreading?

How far has it spread?

Has this happened before?

What do we know about the new mutations?

Where has it come from?

Does it make the infection more deadly?

Will the vaccines work against the new variant?

"The virus will probably be able to generate vaccine escape mutants (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3CT9N89L-c&feature=youtu.be)."

:bs:


The French have banned all accompanied traffic from the United Kingdom after the British government confirmed a new, more contagious strain (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55388846) of the Chinese coronavirus in London and the south-east.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/12/21/continent-cut-off-france-bans-travel-out-uk-new-coronavirus-strain-takes-hold/
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/12/dover-640x480.png

[onawah]

Ruling Overturning Outdoor Dining Ban
‘TRUTH’ With RFK, Jr. and LA Attorney Ryan Keech
12/21/20
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/truth-rfk-jr-ryan-keech-california-restaurant-association/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=8c0edf71-f718-4f0d-ae2a-84905c9c8919

"Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and attorney Ryan Keech discuss how the California Restaurant Association prevailed in its case to overturn Los Angeles County’s recent ban on outdoor dining.

In the latest episode of our second season of “TRUTH” with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Kennedy interviewed lawyer Ryan Keech about the California Restaurant Association’s case against Los Angeles County over the county’s decision last month to ban outdoor dining.

Kennedy and Keech expressed gratitude to the Honorable James C. Chalfant, who heard the case, referring to him as “courageous” for his decision to overturn the ban.

The ruling is tentative and California’s statewide “stay at home” remains in place. Still, this is a victory against the type of draconian measures being taken by local health authorities around the country, Kennedy said.

Keech said the case could serve as a blueprint for fighting overreaching measures applied not only to restaurants but also other businesses, schools and churches. Kennedy and Keech laid out the following timeline of events leading up to Judge Chalfant’s ruling:

In June, Los Angeles County health officials ordered restaurants to move all operations outdoors and applied other restrictions such as social distancing.
In late November, the county changed the order to a ban on outdoor dining, essentially closing restaurants.
The California Restaurant Association wrote a letter to the Board of Health asking the board to “show us the science.”
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted to uphold the outdoor dining/restaurant ban.
Keech’s law firm, Browne George Ross O’Brien Annaguey & Ellis, filed affidavits on behalf of the California Restaurant Association emphasizing that there was no science supporting outdoor dining as a significant spreader of COVID-19.
Judge Chalfant issued a strongly worded ruling on Dec. 8, calling the county’s actions an abuse of power."




https://vimeo.com/490913960

[onawah]

Congress Passes $900 Billion in COVID-19 Relief as Part of $2.3 Billion Omnibus Package
BY MIMI NGUYEN LY
December 21, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/house-passes-900-billion-stimulus-bill_3628283.html

"The House of Representatives and the Senate on Monday passed a $900 billion COVID-19 relief bill following months of negotiations.

Congress also passed a $1.4 trillion annual federal spending package to keep the federal government funded for another year. Totalling $2.3 billion, the year-end government funding package that includes the COVID-19 relief comes to 5,593 pages (pdf), by far the longest bill ever.

The measure passed the House along a 359-53 vote, and passed the Senate along a 91-7 vote. It now moves to President Donald Trump’s desk to the signed. If the bill is signed, a government shutdown would be averted, because federal funding will expire at midnight.

The COVID-19 relief package includes a $600 direct stimulus payment to most Americans making up to $75,000 per year, and $1,200 to couples making up to $150,000, with payments phased out for higher incomes. An additional $600 payment is allotted per dependent child, similar to the last round of relief payments in the spring.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, a key White House negotiator, said on CNBC Monday morning that the direct payments would begin arriving in bank accounts next week if the bill is passed.

The legislation would also provide enhanced unemployment insurance benefits of $300 per week. This is about half the supplemental federal unemployment benefit provided under the $1.8 billion CARES Act in March. The direct $600 stimulus payment was also half the March payment.

The sweeping bill includes $284 billion in Paycheck Protection Program, to cover a second round of small-business loans and grants to especially hard-hit businesses. It would exclude publicly-traded companies from eligibility.

The bill also carves out $25 billion for rental assistance, and extends a ban on evictions that was due to expire by the end of January 2021.

Other subsidies in the bill include about $82 billion for schools, colleges and universities, $10 billion for child care, and $15 billion for theaters and other live venues.

State and local governments, which are struggling to pay for the distribution of newly approved COVID-19 vaccines, would receive $8.75 billion, with $300 million of that targeted at vaccinations in minority and high-risk populations.

“This deal is not everything I want—not by a long shot,” said Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (R-Mass.). “The choice before us is simple. It’s about whether we help families or not. It’s about whether we help small businesses and restaurants or not. It’s about whether we boost (food stamp) benefits and strengthen anti-hunger programs or not. And whether we help those dealing with a job loss or not. To me, this is not a tough call.”

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) opposed the legislation, saying that he “cannot, in good conscience, vote for this legislation that spends billions of taxpayer dollars on pet projects that have nothing to do with COVID relief or keeping the government funded.”

He said that while Americans are struggling financially amid lockdowns during the pandemic, the $2.3 trillion COVID-omnibus bill includes “language to further Green New Deal policies, millions of dollars to build two new Smithsonian museums, and a provision regarding the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, just to name a mere fraction of the ridiculous provisions outlined in this bill.”

“I would have supported targeted relief to help small businesses and individuals who need it most, and a plan to distribute the vaccine to the most vulnerable, but this bill clearly misses the mark,” he wrote.

The bill is likely to be the final major piece of legislation for the 116th Congress that expires on Jan. 3.

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report."

(Finally! What a bunch of Scrooges in our Congress. One can only imagine what the reaction would be were the tables turned. )

[onawah]

BREAKING: Trump Says Stimulus Bill Is 'a Disgrace' (Wants $2000 Checks Included)
1,995 views•Dec 22, 2020
Max Maher
105K subscribers
"Late night stimulus update: Trump says he won't sign the recently passed stimulus and government funding bill because of it's foreign interests and lack of large stimulus second checks to the people."
9iilDVWCBPU


(If he vetoes it, Congress can still pass it.)

**********
Trump Trashes Covid Stimulus Package
Special Message from President Trump
454,475 views•Dec 22, 2020
Donald J Trump
2.57M subscribers
ABYC7ikFIuY


************

Trump Threatens to Veto Stimulus Deal, Calls for $2,000 Direct Payments to Americans
BY JACK PHILLIPS December 22, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-threatens-to-veto-stimulus-deal-calls-for-2000-direct-payments-to-americans_3629739.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-22-5


"President Donald Trump said that Congress needs to pass a pandemic stimulus bill that includes $2,000 direct payments to Americans—not the $600 ones—or else he will veto it.

“Congress found plenty of money for foreign countries, lobbyists, and special interests,” Trump said on Tuesday night in a video released on his social media pages. “While sending the bare minimum to the American people who need it.”

“It wasn’t their fault; it was China’s fault.”

The president said that he will veto the bill unless Congress can provide more money in stimulus payments and loans to small businesses in the midst of the pandemic.

“I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000, or $4,000 for a couple,” he said. “I am also asking Congress to get rid of the unnecessary and wasteful items in this legislation.”

Trump said that lawmakers need to send him a suitable piece of legislation by his standards—or else the next administration will have to sign off on the measure.

“And maybe that administration will be me,” Trump added.

The president pointed to hundreds of millions of dollars tagged for the Egyptian military, Cambodia, Burma, “gender programs” in Pakistan, and numerous other countries. These provisions were also singled out by progressives and conservatives alike as an example of pork-barrel spending.

On Monday night, a number of lawmakers griped that they didn’t have enough time to look through the approximately 5,500-page bill (pdf).

Trump also noted that tens of millions of dollars are going to the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C. “which is not even open for business,” as well as the National Gallery of Arts and the Smithsonian.

Other non-pandemic measures were included, such as combatting the spread of Asian carp in the Great Lakes area, construction projects at the FBI, and others.

The president said he would also veto the bill because stimulus payments are being doled out to “illegal aliens” and their families.

“Despite all of this wasteful spending, the $900 billion package provides hardworking taxpayers only $600 [to Americans] in relief payments,” he said, arguing that not enough cash is being provided to small business owners who have suffered during the pandemic induced lockdowns.

The CCP virus stimulus package bill isn’t the only measure that Trump has threatened to veto in recent days. Last week, the president said he would veto the recently passed defense spending bill because it doesn’t include a repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which serves as a liability shield for social media companies. The bill, meanwhile, would be a boon for China, Trump wrote on Twitter.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) early on Tuesday morning called on the president not to veto the defense bill but said he would work to override it.

“My intention was and is to ensure the Senate continues fulfilling our obligation to the men and women of our armed forces. I hope the president will not veto this bill,” McConnell said on the floor at around 1 a.m.

McConnell added on the floor, referring to Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), that::“The Democratic Leader and I have agreed to unanimous request as follows: the Senate will meet for pro forma sessions only until December 29th when we will return to session.”

[Deborah (ahamkara)]

Trump rightly called out the billions of dollars earmarked to other countries - sending out that taxpayer money is a disgrace and a slap in the face to so many Americans struggling. Congress is not even trying to hide the fact they are gangsters, intent on enriching themselves and their cronies.

[greybeard]

Why are Google & YouTube so Afraid of Dr. Dan Erickson | Sebastian Gorka Radio


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASyKpxpHrA0

[norman]

Hey Kids, meet Dr Fauci (https://podbay.fm/p/the-ten-news/e/1608624000)



"We WILL get back to normal, it may be a few more months, but we WILL" - Dr Fauci . . .( to a bunch of young kids )

[greybeard]

THE TRAIL OF TRUTH

Health Professionals speak


https://brandnewtube.com/watch/the-trail-of-truth_SsCTdTbzbwkmTnj.html

[norman]

The Corbett Report Podcast - 392 – The Future of Vaccines (https://podbay.fm/p/the-corbett-report-podcast/e/1608729000)
Show notes
If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.


UQvaQFdGLn8

[ExomatrixTV]

515381689415575


source (https://www.facebook.com/trunews/videos/515381689415575)

TruNews Headlines with Kerry Kinsey - December 22, 2020

-It's been five days since we've heard from that Chattanooga nurse who passed out while taking a Covid vaccine, Dr. Rashid Buttar explains why her story doesn't make sense, Dr. Buttar:'Vasovagal responses happen immediately not 17 minutes after a person gets a shot,' more doctors are saying the vaccine is dangerous, Dr. Johan Denis:'Coronavirus vaccine might alter your DNA; it was all orchestrated to make you fearful enough to make you take the vaccine,' Tucker Carlson says social media is squelching any information it sees about the vaccine and don't say it's social control, he says Mark Zuckerberg is a professional marketer, Carlson says," Mark Zuckerberg's job is to make you want this vaccine like a cold beer on a hot day,' a great animated version of Bill Gates on "Corona Crazy,' and we'll show you a real case of answered prayer!


source (https://www.trunews.com/stream/trunews-headlines-with-kerry-kinsey-december-22-2020)

[pueblo]

The lie is either crumbling or being purposely dismantled...



University of Florida researchers find no asymptomatic or presymptomatic spread

December 22, 2020

BY LEN CABRERA

Four researchers from the University of Florida Department of Biostatistics co-authored a study published online by the Journal of the American Medical Association. They performed a meta-analysis of 54 studies looking at the household secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2. According to the CDC, the secondary attack rate is the number of new cases among contacts divided by the total number of contacts.

The researchers confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 is more contagious than other coronaviruses, with a secondary attack rate of 16.6% (95% CI 14.0%-19.3%) compared to 7.5% (95%CI 4.8%-10.7%) for SARS-CoV and 4.7% (95%CI, 0.9%-10.7%) for MERS-CoV.

Their findings also confirmed the attack rate is higher to adult contacts compared to child contacts and to spouses compared to other family members.

The secondary attack rate for symptomatic index cases was 18.0% (95% CI 14.2%-22.1%), and the rate of asymptomatic and presymptomatic index cases was 0.7% (95% CI 0%-4.9%), “although there were few studies in the latter group.” The asymptomatic/presymptomatic secondary attack rate is not statistically different from zero, and the confidence interval is technically 0.7 ± 4.2, resulting in a range of -3.5%-4.9%, but attack rates cannot be negative, so it is truncated at 0.


https://alachuachronicle.com/university-of-florida-researchers-find-no-asymptomatic-spread/

[onawah]

Breitbart: anti-lockdown protestors force their way into Oregon capitol
by Jon Rappoport
December 23, 2020

"I’m reprinting the Breitbart article here. My one-sentence introduction is: what did lockdown politicians expect was going to happen, sooner or later?

Breitbart, 21 December, by Bob Price: “A group of anti-lockdown, pro-Trump protesters forced their way into the Oregon Capitol Monday. One report shows some of the protesters were armed with rifles, handguns, and even a pitchfork.”

“A large group forced their way into the capitol as the legislature met on the opening day of the state’s third special session. The protesters expressed opposition to the state’s ordering of certain businesses to close.”

“While legislative sessions are normally open to the public, today’s was closed to anyone other than lawmakers, police, some staff, and reporters, the Oregon Statesman-Journal reported. Legislators met to attempt to pass pandemic-relief measures including landlord and tenant assistance.”

“Reports on social media show the group of protesters gathered outside the Oregon Capitol on Monday morning.”

“Salem Reporter journalist Jake Thomas tweeted a video showing a woman urging protesters to enter the capitol. One man reportedly shouted that people should be willing to get maced or arrested.”

“State police pushed the crowd back and at one point deployed blue pepper spray.”

“Police say the pepper spray was used in response to officers being sprayed by the protesters.”

“’At one point we used pepper balls. I don’t know what else,’ Salem Police Lt. Teven Upkes told the Statesman-Journal. ‘When people attempted to come in to the building they actually used pepper spray and other things on officers. In return we used those to separate ourselves and get them to hold that spot. So I don’t know what all was used but I know at least pepper ball was used’.”

“At one point, Oregon State Senator Dallas Heard (R-Roseburg) came out and addressed the protesters.”

“Reports indicate police arrested at least two people during the demonstration.”

“During the session, Senator Heard accused Oregon Governor Kate Brown of carrying out a ‘campaign against the people and children of God.’ He stood for a 30-second moment of silence, one Twitter user posted.”

“’This is yet another illegitimate session in which you, the democratic majority, have declared the people unfit to participate in person in their own Capitol building,’ Heard said on the floor of the Senate, according to KEZI ABC9. ‘Let the record reflect that I am in fierce opposition to any legislation that this illegitimate assembly may pass today. You will be held accountable for this in the coming years’.”

“’I declare my right to protest against your false authority and remove my mask,’ the senator said while taking off his mask. ‘I will stand here for 30 seconds while you decide if you are fascists willing to use the government to force and override my rights or to prove that you are nothing more than bullies and false authorities’.”

“The Daily Beast and the Daily Mail reported some of the protesters gathered outside the capitol were armed with ‘black rifles’ and handguns. Photos in both articles show a woman armed with a U.S. flag on a pitchfork.”

“Another video tweeted by Oregon Statesman reporter Abigail Dollins shows protests trying to force their way through a locked door.”

“Salem Statesman photojournalist Brian Hayes tweeted a video showing some of the protesters who succeeded in gaining entry inside the capitol. At least one of those protesters appears to be armed with a rifle.”

“He also tweeted a video showing protesters tearing down a covering on a vandalized marble relief outside the capitol.”

(The mental image of a protester carrying a pitchfork to the capitol made me :lol: )

[onawah]

There may be a stand-alone $2000 stimulus check bill.
See: CrRrJ6oBvXg

[onawah]

:bump: Excellent report from Corbett, featuring C.A. Fitts, Del Bigtree and much more

The Corbett Report Podcast - 392 – The Future of Vaccines (https://podbay.fm/p/the-corbett-report-podcast/e/1608729000)
Show notes
If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.


UQvaQFdGLn8

[Patient]

:bump: Excellent report from Corbett, featuring C.A. Fitts, Del Bigtree and much more

The Corbett Report Podcast - 392 – The Future of Vaccines (https://podbay.fm/p/the-corbett-report-podcast/e/1608729000)
Show notes
If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.


UQvaQFdGLn8

...and where is the proof that it vaccinates people from getting the virus?

[onawah]

No proof whatsoever of that! Proof a-plenty that it will do much harm, however! And proof of the underlying genocidal, population reduction, elitist agenda.


...and where is the proof that it vaccinates people from getting the virus?

[norman]

Pharmaceutical factory that manufactures hydroxychloroquine mysteriously bursts into flames, explodes (https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-24-pharmaceutical-factory-hydroxychloroquine-mysteriously-explodes-fire.html)

Thursday, December 24, 2020 by: Ethan Huff (https://www.naturalnews.com/author/ethanh)


On Dec. 20, an SCI Pharmtech manufacturing facility in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, burst into flames and exploded (https://taiwanenglishnews.com/pharmaceutical-factory-on-fire-after-explosion-2-injured/), leaving two people injured.

[onawah]

Pelosi to Bring $2,000 Direct Payments to Vote on Monday
BY MASOOMA HAQ December 24, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/pelosi-to-bring-2000-direct-payments-to-vote-on-monday_3631753.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-24-2

(Not looking good for any stimulus getting sent until sometime in January, if then.)

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that she will call House members back on Monday to hold a recorded vote on the $2,000 direct payment measure requested by President Donald Trump.

“Monday, I will bring the House back to a session where we will hold a recorded vote on our standalone bill to increase economic impact payments to $2,000,” Pelosi said in a statement. “To vote against this bill is to deny the financial hardship that families face and to deny them the relief they need,” she added.

On Tuesday Trump criticized the omnibus spending package that had been finalized by Congress on Monday, saying that more money was going to foreign countries and lobbyists than to the American people.

He urged Congress to increase direct payments to American families from $600 to $2,000.

On Thursday House Democrats filed a unanimous consent request for $2,000 direct payments, which was blocked by Republicans. They have so far been silent about the reasons for blocking the increased payments, but they did address the portion of the spending package that sends millions overseas to help foreign countries.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Wednesday evening told GOP members that they would file a counter unanimous consent request to revisit the foreign aid in the 2021 omnibus, and criticized Democrats for not revisiting that portion of the package.

House Democrats “have conveniently ignored the concerns expressed by the president, and shared by our constituents, that we ought to reexamine how our tax dollars are spent overseas while so many of our neighbors at home are struggling to make ends meet,” a letter by McCarthy said.

“Thus, Republicans will offer a unanimous consent request to revisit the state and foreign operations title of the omnibus so that we can fully address the concerns at hand. It will be up to Speaker Pelosi to decide if she wants to act on behalf of the American people,” McCarthy wrote.

Democrats objected to the GOP’s unanimous consent request.

House rules authorize leaders of either party to object to unanimous consent requests on the floor, but they allow the bill to be voted on by roll call.

Meanwhile, Pelosi called on the president to convince Republican members not to obstruct the increased direct payment measure.

“House Republicans cruelly deprived the American people of the $2,000 that the president agreed to support,” Pelosi wrote. “If the president is serious about the $2,000 direct payments, he must call on House Republicans to end their obstruction.”

Pelosi said that Democrats have been pushing for larger direct payments to families, but “House and Senate Republicans have repeatedly rejected—first, during our negotiations when they said that they would not go above $600 and now, with this act of callousness on the floor.”

She said she hoped that by Monday the president “will have already signed the bipartisan and bicameral legislation to keep the government open and to deliver coronavirus relief.”

Along with the vote on the direct payments, the House will also vote to override Trump’s veto of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

The president vetoed the $740 billion act on Wednesday.

“Unfortunately, the act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions,” Trump said in a Dec. 23 statement. “It is a ‘gift’ to China and Russia,” he added. "

[Gwin Ru]

France: Bill to Ban COVID Vaccine Refusers from Public Transport Put on ‘Pause’ Due to Backlash (https://needtoknow.news/2020/12/france-bill-to-ban-covid-vaccine-refusers-from-public-transport-put-on-pause-due-to-backlash/)

December 25, 2020 (https://needtoknow.news/2020/12/) Barrons, Summit News and Politico (https://needtoknow.news/author/bookworm33/) 0 (https://needtoknow.news/2020/12/france-bill-to-ban-covid-vaccine-refusers-from-public-transport-put-on-pause-due-to-backlash/#mh-comments)


https://dhna0nwgp8ihl.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/25062812/Screen-Shot-2020-12-25-at-6.27.24-AM-678x381.jpg
Pixabay


France:

A radical new bill could ban people who fail to get a Covid-19 vaccination or provide a negative test from using public transport and other activities. France has imposed some of the strictest lockdown measures in Europe, with citizens having to fill out a form every time they leave their home. A recent poll found that 59% of the population will refuse the new vaccine. French President Emmanuel Macron and the Health Minister promised that coronavirus vaccinations will not be mandatory. Critics say that Macron is planning a health dictatorship and that the government is using ‘vaccine blackmail.’ A law professor pointed out that the bill would curb parliament’s powers because the exceptional measures could all be implemented by decree and would give executive authorities nearly unlimited power.

The government has been forced to delay the legislation for several months after angry protests.

The EU gave the green light for a Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine on Monday, paving the way for the first inoculations to start across 27 countries just after Christmas.
People who fail to get a Covid-19 vaccination could be banned from using public transport in France, according to a draft law sparking angry protests from opposition politicians on Tuesday.

Prime Minister Jean Castex on Monday got his cabinet’s backing for a bill that is designed to provide a legal framework for dealing with health crises, including the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the text, which will now be submitted to parliament, a negative Covid test or proof of a “preventative treatment, including the administration of a vaccine” could be required for people to be granted “access to transport or to some locations, as well as certain activities”.

The government’s vaccination campaign is to start on Sunday, and officials already face widespread resistance to a treatment developed in record time since the outbreak hit Europe early this year.

A recent poll by the Journal du Dimanche newspaper found that 59 percent of respondents said they would not get a Covid shot, one of the highest rates in the European Union.

President Emmanuel Macron has promised that coronavirus vaccinations, though strongly recommended, will not be mandatory, a pledge reiterated by Health Minister Olivier Veran on Tuesday.

“I say it once again, vaccination is not mandatory,” Veran said, while also appearing to leave the door open to modifications of the bill as it “matures” during parliamentary debates.

But opposition politicians condemned the draft law, with Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right RN party, calling it an “essentially totalitarian” measure.

“In a backhanded way, this bill does not aim to make vaccinations mandatory, but will prevent anybody who doesn’t comply from having a social life,” she said.

Suspend our freedoms
RN party spokesman Sebastien Chenu said Macron’s government was planning “a health dictatorship”.

Guillaume Peltier, deputy leader of the centre-right LR party, said it was “inconceivable” that the government should be allowed to “get all the power to suspend our freedoms without parliamentary control”.

Centrist senator Nathalie Goulet said the draft was “an attack on public freedoms”, while the far-left deputy Alexis Corbiere said “we could at least have a collective discussion if the idea is to limit our public liberties.”

Laureline Fontaine, a law professor at the Sorbonne Nouvelle university in Paris, told AFP that the draft bill would effectively curb parliament’s powers, “because these exceptional measures could all be implemented by decree.”

“It potentially gives nearly unlimited powers to the executive authorities,” she said.

Read full article here… (https://www.barrons.com/news/anti-vaxxers-could-face-public-transport-ban-in-france-01608649204)


Additional Sources:


https://summit.news/2020/12/24/france-forced-to-postpone-health-dictatorship-vaccine-legislation/



https://www.politico.eu/article/france-mandatory-vaccination-bill-postponed/

[rgray222]

Leaked Documents Show How China’s Army of Paid Internet Trolls Helped Censor the Coronavirus

As the coronavirus spread in China, the government stage-managed what appeared on the domestic internet to make the virus look less severe and the authorities more capable, according to thousands of leaked directives and other files.

In the early hours of Feb. 7, China’s powerful internet censors experienced an unfamiliar and deeply unsettling sensation. They felt they were losing control.

The news was spreading quickly that Li Wenliang, a doctor who had warned about a strange new viral outbreak only to be threatened by the police and accused of peddling rumors, had died of COVID-19. Grief and fury coursed through social media. To people at home and abroad, Li’s death showed the terrible cost of the Chinese government’s instinct to suppress inconvenient information.

Yet China’s censors decided to double down. Warning of the “unprecedented challenge” Li’s passing had posed and the “butterfly effect” it may have set off, officials got to work suppressing the inconvenient news and reclaiming the narrative, according to confidential directives sent to local propaganda workers and news outlets.

They ordered news websites not to issue push notifications alerting readers to his death. They told social platforms to gradually remove his name from trending topics pages. And they activated legions of fake online commenters to flood social sites with distracting chatter, stressing the need for discretion: “As commenters fight to guide public opinion, they must conceal their identity, avoid crude patriotism and sarcastic praise, and be sleek and silent in achieving results.”

Special instructions were issued to manage anger over Dr. Li’s death.
https://assets-c3.propublica.org/images/articles/_threeTwo1600w/2020-1218-ccp-excerpt-do-not-use-push-notifications.jpg
https://assets-c3.propublica.org/images/articles/_threeTwo1600w/2020-1218-ccp-excerpt-we-must-recognize.jpg
The orders were among thousands of secret government directives and other documents that were reviewed by The New York Times and ProPublica. They lay bare in extraordinary detail the systems that helped the Chinese authorities shape online opinion during the pandemic.
At a time when digital media is deepening social divides in Western democracies, China is manipulating online discourse to enforce the Communist Party’s consensus. To stage-manage what appeared on the Chinese internet early this year, the authorities issued strict commands on the content and tone of news coverage, directed paid trolls to inundate social media with party-line blather and deployed security forces to muzzle unsanctioned voices.

Though China makes no secret of its belief in rigid internet controls, the documents convey just how much behind-the-scenes effort is involved in maintaining a tight grip. It takes an enormous bureaucracy, armies of people, specialized technology made by private contractors, the constant monitoring of digital news outlets and social media platforms — and, presumably, lots of money.

It is much more than simply flipping a switch to block certain unwelcome ideas, images or pieces of news.

China’s curbs on information about the outbreak started in early January, before the novel coronavirus had even been identified definitively, the documents show. When infections started spreading rapidly a few weeks later, the authorities clamped down on anything that cast China’s response in too “negative” a light.

The United States and other countries have for months accused China of trying to hide the extent of the outbreak in its early stages. It may never be clear whether a freer flow of information from China would have prevented the outbreak from morphing into a raging global health calamity. But the documents indicate that Chinese officials tried to steer the narrative not only to prevent panic and debunk damaging falsehoods domestically. They also wanted to make the virus look less severe — and the authorities more capable — as the rest of the world was watching.

The documents include more than 3,200 directives and 1,800 memos and other files from the offices of the country’s internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China, in the eastern city of Hangzhou. They also include internal files and computer code from a Chinese company, Urun Big Data Services, that makes software used by local governments to monitor internet discussion and manage armies of online commenters.

The documents were shared with The Times and ProPublica by a hacker group that calls itself CCP Unmasked, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. The Times and ProPublica independently verified the authenticity of many of the documents, some of which had been obtained separately by China Digital Times, a website that tracks Chinese internet controls.

The CAC and Urun did not respond to requests for comment.

“China has a politically weaponized system of censorship; it is refined, organized, coordinated and supported by the state’s resources,” said Xiao Qiang, a research scientist at the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley, and the founder of China Digital Times. “It’s not just for deleting something. They also have a powerful apparatus to construct a narrative and aim it at any target with huge scale.”

“This is a huge thing,” he added. “No other country has that.”

To read the rest of the story: https://www.propublica.org/article/leaked-documents-show-how-chinas-army-of-paid-internet-trolls-helped-censor-the-coronavirus

[ExomatrixTV]

They don’t want us talking!!!!

FPJLr_Ypy0s

[onawah]

Could it be a coincidence that the AMA finally (quietly) acknowledged hydroxychloroquine as being safe and effective treatment for Covid after all, at almost the same time that the world's main factory that manufactures it explodes?
(...Boy, Big Pharma REALLY HATES IT when anything eats into their prodigious profits!)
And FaceBook won't allow me to post the URL to the article about the factory explosion. (It's against their "community guidelines.")

See: https://sipoftea.blog/hypocrites-the-american-medical-association-is-very-quietly-trying-to-change-their-position-on-hydroxychloroquine-to-treat-covid-19/

http://https://sipoftea.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/document.png
The American Medical Association is very quietly trying to change its position over the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus patients.

In March the American Medical Association came out against the use of hydroxychloroquine after President Trump touted its use to treat the Wuhan virus. The media, Dr. Fauci, and liberal medical journals went nuts and did everything to dissuade Americans from seeking treatment.

“We caution hospitals, health systems, other entities, and individual practitioners that no medication has been FDA-approved for use in COVID-19 patients,” the AMA’s March statement reads in regards to HCQ and similar unconventional treatments. “Definitive evidence for the role of these drugs in treating COVID-19 patients has not been determined through robust clinical trials; decisions to use these medications off-label must be made with extreme caution and careful monitoring. Physicians, pharmacists, patients and policymakers must understand that these medications have dangerous side effects that may lead to patient harm, including fatal cardiac arrhythmias.”

This month the AMA discussed considering a resolution to reverse their stance on HCQ because the potential for good may supersede the threat of any potentially harmful side effects.

RESOLVED, THAT OUR AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION RESCIND ITS STATEMENT CALLING FOR PHYSICIANS TO STOP PRESCRIBING HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND CHLOROQUINE UNTIL SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE BECOMES AVAILABLE TO CONCLUSIVELY ILLUSTRATE THAT THE HARM ASSOCIATED WITH USE OUTWEIGHS BENEFIT EARLY IN THE DISEASE COURSE,” THE MEMO READS.

A memo showed that the AMA was considering a joint statement with the American Pharmacists Association and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists that further studies are ongoing to “clarify any potential benefit of hydroxychloroquine and combination therapies for the treatment of COVID-19.”

What ended up happing was that the AMA did not rescind their objection to physicians prescribing HCQ but reaffirmed its policy to encourage Doctors to use their own judgment to prescribe drugs off label to treat COVID.

The AMA has blood on their hands, for the sake of politics they came out against HCQ, and now they are using double talk to save face."

Publishedreporter.com

Written by Staff Writer – December 16, 2020

Pharmaceutical factory that manufactures hydroxychloroquine mysteriously bursts into flames, explodes (https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-24-pharmaceutical-factory-hydroxychloroquine-mysteriously-explodes-fire.html)

Thursday, December 24, 2020 by: Ethan Huff (https://www.naturalnews.com/author/ethanh)


On Dec. 20, an SCI Pharmtech manufacturing facility in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, burst into flames and exploded (https://taiwanenglishnews.com/pharmaceutical-factory-on-fire-after-explosion-2-injured/), leaving two people injured.

Here's that Natural News article:
"Pharmaceutical factory that manufactures hydroxychloroquine mysteriously bursts into flames, explodes
Thursday, December 24, 2020 by: Ethan Huff
https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/91/2020/12/Fire-Ball-Explosion.jpg
(Natural News) On Dec. 20, an SCI Pharmtech manufacturing facility in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, burst into flames and exploded, leaving two people injured.

The facility, which manufactures the anti-Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) drug hydroxychloroquine, appears to have been targeted, perhaps by COVID-19 vaccine interests, in an effort to punish the company for manufacturing the inexpensive, highly effective remedy for the novel virus.

People as far away as New Taipei City, located in Taiwan’s Tamsui District, reported hearing a large blast shortly after noon on Sunday. Immediately following the blast, thick black smoke was seen pouring out of the SCI Pharmtech factory.

A 30-year-old foreign migrant worker suffered third-degree burns to about 90 percent of his body, and is now in critical condition. A 40-year-old man suffered similar burns but only on his hand. Both men were rushed to Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for treatment.

The SCI Pharmtech factory in question is the second-largest HCQ provider in Asia. It has since been closed, meaning no more HCQ production for the time being. The nearby Taipei Taoyuan International Airport, however, remains open for travel despite being in close proximity to the deadly blast.

Authorities are still investigating the cause of the explosion, which is all too convenient having occurred just days after Big Vaccine started publicly releasing COVID-19 jabs as the alleged “cure” for the plandemic.

More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.

Hydroxychloroquine is cheap and effective against COVID-19, which is why Big Pharma wants it to go away
Back in the spring when the plandemic was first announced, the Trump administration claimed that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was on the verge of approving chloroquine and HCQ as potential remedies for COVID-19. This ultimately did not happen, though, as the agency decided to do the exact opposite by prohibiting its prescription for the novel disease.

However, some countries are still administering and using HCQ as an effective remedy for COVID-19, which seems to be a point of contention for those trying to push vaccines instead.

Because HCQ is a competitor of COVID-19 vaccines, it would appear as though powerful entities are trying to squelch it – including, potentially, through acts of terrorism, which could be what caused this explosion.

We do not yet have concrete proof of this, so consider it speculation at this point. Based on the circumstances, though, this writer would describe it more as informed speculation based on prior knowledge of how the pharmaceutical industry operates.

Just so you are aware, HCQ is a synthetic derivative of quinine, a naturally occurring compound found in cinchona bark. It is chemically different from natural quinine, though, bearing only a “small resemblance” to the real thing.

“Historically, hydroxychloroquine was discovered during efforts to synthesize alternatives to quinine as anti-malarials,” says Alan Armstrong, a professor of organic synthesis at Imperial College London.

“There is a small resemblance in chemical structure in that both contain a ring system known as quinoline,” he adds.

First developed in the 1950s from chloroquine, one of the first pharmaceutical remedies for malaria, HCQ goes under trade names like Plaquenil, Quensyl, and Plaquinol. It recently made a resurgence based on evidence suggesting that it could be an effective remedy for COVID-19.

“Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetically manufactured drug, developed based on the chemical structure of?quinine,” indicated a spokesman for the French pharmaceutical company Sanofi, which produces Plaquenil.

“Quinine?is not a component of our drug Plaquenil, the active ingredient is hydroxychloroquine.”

British tonic water manufacturer Fever Tree uses quinone in its formula, quinone being the constituent used in genuine tonic water to give it medicinal benefits. Some people are taking natural quinine instead of HCQ to try to protect themselves against COVID-19.

Sources for this article include:

TaiwanEnglishNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Forbes.com

Reuters.com "

[Eric J (Viking)]

Says it all...Empty beds in U.K., because we all know it’s a load of tosh.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9072773/Britains-deserted-Nightingale-hospitals-Facilities-built-relieve-strain-empty.html

Viking

[ExomatrixTV]

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=45584&d=1608980438


Herd Immunity: WHO changes definition in 2020.

The reason they can handily switch definitions at will is that the "herd immunity" concept is not only flawed in essence, has zero scientific evidence or proof, it's a complete fabrication that had led to a major misconception of how nature works.

There is a marked difference between the 2 definitions though they both have 1 thing in common:

They are both wrong!



W.H.O. (Run by China & Bill Gates) Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity (https://www.aier.org/article/who-deletes-naturally-acquired-immunity-from-its-website) from Its Website

[ExomatrixTV]

DOKTERS OF THE NETHERLANDS ARE SPEAKING UP !

1LRjwo_LmzI

[ExomatrixTV]

The Gates Vaccine Is "Safe" - The Government Says So - David Icke:

7J2g60NC6KAJ
source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/7J2g60NC6KAJ/)


So when you combine:

01. Rockefeller PDF Document Operation Lockstep (https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Annual-Report-2010-1.pdf) 2010
02. Rockefeller Foundation PDF (http://tinyurl.com/Rockefeller-Foundation-PDF2020) Track & Tracing ID2020
03. World Economic Forum #Agenda2030 (https://www.weforum.org/strategic-intelligence)
04. Bill Gates (http://tinyurl.com/BillGatesTyranny) and his "Event 201 (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/)" exercise in Fall 2019
05. "The Great Reset (http://tinyurl.com/The-Great-Reset-Cover-Up)"
06. Club of Rome "Planetary Emergency Plan (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111849-Club-of-Rome-PLANETARY-EMERGENCY-PLAN)"
07. "Global Governance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_governance)" run by unelected (psychopathic) Technocrats (http://Technocracy.News) using advanced A.I. Algorithms!
08. 5G - Mass A.I. Surveillance Smart Grid (http://tinyurl.com/Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible) (The Big Elephant in The Room!).
09. Supreme Court Defeats George Soros and his Overseas Groups (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111496-Supreme-Court-Defeats-George-Soros-and-his-Overseas-Groups)

All in plain sight ... meanwhile almost all Mainstream Media refuses to ask the hard questions!

cheers,
John Kuhles aka ExomatrixTV

[kfm27917]

Staff in NHS laboratories are increasingly alarmed at the implications of the government’s turn to create a new network of “super-labs” to process what is supposed to be a rising number of tests for Covid-19, leaving 44 NHS labs under-used.

The development of a new network of labs running parallel to the NHS has taken place with no transparency and no attempt to consult with the unions.

NHS scientific staff in south London have now contacted the Lowdown to express their frustration that while they have the capacity to process large numbers of tests, the NHS labs are struggling to get supplies of the kits and the reagents required.

(and more at https://lowdownnhs.info/comment/why-bypass-nhs-labs-for-mass-testing-concerns-over-new-super-labs/

[Eric J (Viking)]

There can only be 1 truth out there! It’s either Fauxi or this RN with a Masters Degree! (Video)

https://twitter.com/thepopas/status/1341765222894161925?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1341765222894161925%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstateofthenation.co%2F%3Fp%3D43756

http://https://twitter.com/thepopas/status/1341765222894161925?
ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1341765222894161925%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstateofthenation.co%2F%3Fp%3D43756

Viking https://twitter.com/thepopas/status/1341765222894161925?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1341765222894161925%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstateofthenation.co%2F%3Fp%3D43756

[onawah]

Breaking: Trump just signed the stimulus package
Trump Signs Stimulus Bill!!! December 27, 2020
2,677 watching now•Started streaming 49 minutes ago
2K
Blind to Billionaire
143K subscribers
HlbIMLYy3kk

[onawah]

Trump Signs $2.3 Trillion Relief and Spending Bill, Says More Money to Come
BY JANITA KAN December 27, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-signs-2-3-trillion-spending-bill-says-more-money-to-come_3634156.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-27-5

"President Donald Trump on Sunday evening signed the $2.3 trillion pandemic relief and spending bill after reaching an agreement with Congress over stimulus checks, Section 230, and voter fraud, the White House said.

Trump’s signing of the bill, which includes a $900 billion COVID-19 relief package, means a partial government shutdown is now averted, while financial aid for Americans will be delivered.

“As President of the United States it is my responsibility to protect the people of our country from the economic devastation and hardship that was caused by the China Virus,” Trump said in a statement.

“I am signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits, stop evictions, provide rental assistance, add money for PPP, return our airline workers back to work, add substantially more money for vaccine distribution, and much more.”

He added that “more money is coming” and vowed to “never give up” his fight for the American people.

This comes following a delay due to Congress’s failure to meet Trump’s demand to increase stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 per person. Trump had repeatedly expressed dissatisfaction over what he describes as “wasteful” spending in the bill while Americans continue to struggle due to pandemic lockdowns.

Although the bill, passed by both houses of Congress earlier this week, was sent to the White House on Christmas Eve, Trump did not immediately act on it but instead pressured lawmakers to revisit portions of the omnibus bill that sends funding to foreign and domestic programs and to increase economic aid for Americans.

This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

Read the president’s whole statement on the signing of the bill here:

'As President of the United States it is my responsibility to protect the people of our country from the economic devastation and hardship that was caused by the China Virus.

I understand that many small businesses have been forced to close as a result of harsh actions by Democrat-run states. Many people are back to work, but my job is not done until everyone is back to work.

Fortunately, as a result of my work with Congress in passing the CARES Act earlier this year, we avoided another Great Depression. Under my leadership, Project Warp Speed has been a tremendous success, my Administration and I developed a vaccine many years ahead of wildest expectations, and we are distributing these vaccines, and others soon coming, to millions of people.

As President, I have told Congress that I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $2,000 checks per adult and $600 per child.

As President I am demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The Act provides that, “whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided, or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message” describing the amount to be reserved, the relevant accounts, the reasons for the rescission, and the economic effects of the rescission. 2 U.S.C. § 683.

I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed. I will send back to Congress a redlined version, item by item, accompanied by the formal rescission request to Congress insisting that those funds be removed from the bill.

I am signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits, stop evictions, provide rental assistance, add money for PPP, return our airline workers back to work, add substantially more money for vaccine distribution, and much more.

On Monday the House will vote to increase payments to individuals from $600 to $2,000. Therefore, a family of four would receive $5,200. Additionally, Congress has promised that Section 230, which so unfairly benefits Big Tech at the expense of the American people, will be reviewed and either be terminated or substantially reformed.

Likewise, the House and Senate have agreed to focus strongly on the very substantial voter fraud which took place in the November 3 Presidential election.

The Senate will start the process for a vote that increases checks to $2,000, repeals Section 230, and starts an investigation into voter fraud.

Big Tech must not get protections of Section 230!

Voter Fraud must be fixed!

Much more money is coming. I will never give up my fight for the American people!' "

[greybeard]

Representing pro bono lawyers gathering evidence for negligence, malfeasance claims against HMGov for use of PCR testing, causing unprecedented collateral harms

https://twitter.com/pcrclaims?s=11

[greybeard]

Criminal Prosecution against CV19 Dictatorship
State Terrorism Affecting the Fundamental Interests of the Nation and Crime Against Humanity

https://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/criminal-prosecution-against-cv19-dictatorship?postId=5feb1640098d3e00174c161e

https://new.awakeningchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/State-terrorism_criminal-persecution_ENG-1-1.pdf

[ExomatrixTV]

Only "14,415 views" in 7 days? with 158,000+ Subscribers? WTF? :suspicious: :facepalm::pout::twitch::rant::yell: :tsk:

This very important high quality video is OBVIOUS "shadow-banned" - "de-listed" - "comment-ghosted" - "buried" - blocked in multiple search engines - taken off ALL "recommendation-feeds" ... totally rigged & hijacked (corrupted) "news-feeds" for all subscribers ... etc. etc. ... That shows how fearful they are being exposed!

cheers,
John


Gates Says No Normal Until 2022, U.S. Billionaires Increase Wealth by $1 Trillion Since Lockdowns

o8QhgZcqz-U

[pyrangello]

This video is 27 minutes long with interviews and opinions from docs every 2 minutes from all around the world. The US have inoculated 2 million so far, they hoped for 20 million by the end of the year, far short of what they expected. Everyone I speak with says no way. Watch the video make your own decision.
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/doctors-from-around-world-warn-dont-take-covid-vaccine
Doctors From Around World Warn: DONT TAKE COVID VACCINE

It amazes me the people like Gates who are the most isolated and disconnected from all of us the common citizens of the world have more sense than us. They don't even have a clue, but they do have lots of money.

[ExomatrixTV]

tinyurl.com/StopTheLockdown-Activism-2021 (http://tinyurl.com/StopTheLockdown-Activism-2021)

45624


1343617056890040320
source (https://twitter.com/AidanGoodheart/status/1343617056890040320)

[Chester]

The post made here was made here in error. It has now been posted to the intended thread. (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-associated-US-political-analysis&p=1399811&viewfull=1#post1399811)

[syrwong]

This video is 27 minutes long with interviews and opinions from docs every 2 minutes from all around the world. The US have inoculated 2 million so far, they hoped for 20 million by the end of the year, far short of what they expected. Everyone I speak with says no way. Watch the video make your own decision.
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/doctors-from-around-world-warn-dont-take-covid-vaccine
Doctors From Around World Warn: DONT TAKE COVID VACCINE

It amazes me the people like Gates who are the most isolated and disconnected from all of us the common citizens of the world have more sense than us. They don't even have a clue, but they do have lots of money.

THE superficial rationals they give for two agendas are contradictory. 1. Vaccinate everyone for multi-purposes of the NWO and 2. Ban everyone from travelling and with it the total demolition of the world economy that paves the way for the Great Reset, or just for punishing humans. They have to promote vaccines as the ultimate solution to the covid19-21 for the first agenda. But if it is so good, then we could return to the old normal and be free again. No, this contradicts the second agenda. So to convince people they are compatible, the WHO concocts this wonderful paradox that vaccines is the only cure for the pandemic but cannot release you from social distancing and quarantines and wearing masks.

[ExomatrixTV]

DO NOT Get Tested ~ Worse Than You Can Possibly Imagine ~ Ms. Celeste Solum Validated...Again:

0XYDL1Ck0E8Q
source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/0XYDL1Ck0E8Q/)

[ExomatrixTV]

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=45625


source (https://www.facebook.com/johnn.kuhless/posts/410840837026854)

[ExomatrixTV]

The Lawsuit That Could End Covid-1984 with Dr. Pam Popper:

5CHRl_h8vMw
Ever since the world became aware of Covid-19 in early 2020, we have warned of the possibility that the government response, may turn out to be worse than the condition itself. Many have described this response as a form of medical tyranny, sold to us as a temporary measure for the greater good. Two weeks to flatten the curve they said. Four months into the lockdowns, some of us half jokingly said things like, ‘I hope they lift the lockdowns before the 4th of July, so we can celebrate our freedoms.’ Now we find ourselves eight months in to a two week lockdown with no end in sight. Despite the fact that a Federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled the shut downs were unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court also ruled that the Governor’s emergency orders had violated the constitution. So why hasn’t anything changed? In this interview Spiro’s guest Dr. Pamela Popper discusses two new lawsuits that she believes could end Covid-1984. The two lawsuits, one in Ohio and one in New Mexico, challenge the root of the problem, the emergency itself.


source (https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/the-lawsuit-that-could-end-covid-1984-with-dr-pam-popper.html)

Backup Video:

aFBnQ9bXWlvn
source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/aFBnQ9bXWlvn/)

[ExomatrixTV]

When Good Science is Suppressed by the Medical-Political Complex, People Die!

The coronavirus pandemic has “unleashed state corruption on a grand scale” that is “harmful to public health”, a scathing editorial in medical journal the BMJ has said.

In an unusually political intervention for the Highly-Respected Scientific Publication (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=hootsuite&utm_content=sme&utm_campaign=usage), it warns that politicians are “suppressing science” and accuses the government of “opportunistic embezzlement”.

“The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency – a time when it is even more important to safeguard science,” the article – penned by executive editor Kamran Abbasi – says.

Suppression of Science

It zeroes in on four examples of “suppression of science or scientists”. Firstly, the secrecy that initially surrounded the membership and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE), which were “initially secret until a press leak forced transparency”.

Referencing a bombshell story in the Guardian which revealed that Dominic Cummings, the prime minister’s departed chief adviser, sat in on SAGE meetings, “the leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers”, and exposed “under-representation from public health, clinical care, women and ethnic minorities”.
The editorial goes on to criticise Public Health England’s work on Covid-19 and inequality – “a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld” – and the blocking of a government scientist “from speaking to media because of a ‘difficult political landscape’”.

Finally, it points the finger at Operation Moonshot, which “depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests” and “the questionable logic of mass screening”.

Political interference

“Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification” Abbasi writes. “Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence.

“A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public.
“But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.”

Referencing accusations of cronyism at the heart of the government’s pandemic response, the BMJ claims that Johnson and his ministers have relied “too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture Covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments and vaccines”.

People Die

Earlier this year it emerged that the UK’s chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance has a £600,000 shareholding in drugs giant GlaxoSmithKline, which has been contracted to develop a Covid-19 vaccine.

“Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates,” the article says.

“Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.
“The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed.
“When good science is suppressed, people die.”

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-1) Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-2) The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office. 3 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-3) 4 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-4)

Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.5 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-5)6 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-6) Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-7)

Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-8) The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-9) It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test. 10 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-10) 11 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-11)

The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers. 12 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-12) 13 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-13)

Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office. 14 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-14)

Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.

Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.

Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. 15 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-15)

Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-16)

The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-17) Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-18)

How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.

Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.

Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-19)

The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money.

Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-20)

The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.

Footnotes


Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ's website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.


bmj.com/coronavirus/usage (https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage)


References:


Geoghegan P. Cronyism and clientelism. London Review of Books 2020 Nov 5. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n21/peter-geoghegan/cronyism-and-clientelism


Scally G,
Jacobson B,
Abbasi K

The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ2020;369:m1932. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1932 pmid:32414712
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNjkvbWF5MTVfMTcvbTE5MzIiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Scally&author[1]=B+Jacobson&author[2]=K+Abbasi&title=The+UK’s+public+health+response+to+covid-19&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=369)


Iacobucci G

Pandemic preparedness: Government must release 2016 report, says information commissioner. BMJ2020;371:m3953. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3953 pmid:33046458
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvb2N0MTJfNi9tMzk1MyI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Pandemic+preparedness:+Government+must+release+2016+report,+says+information+commissioner&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)
Department of Health and Social Care. Policy paper. Annex B: Exercise Cygnus report. 5 Nov 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-pandemic-preparedness/exercise-cygnus-report-accessible-report
Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf


Khunti K,
Platt L,
Routen A,
Abbasi K

Covid-19 and ethnic minorities: an urgent agenda for overdue action. BMJ2020;369:m2503. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2503 pmid:32576558
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNjkvanVuMjNfMTUvbTI1MDMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=K+Khunti&author[1]=L+Platt&author[2]=A+Routen&author[3]=K+Abbasi&title=Covid-19+and+ethnic+minorities:+an+urgent+agenda+for+overdue+action&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=369)
Horton R. Tweet, 15 Oct 2020. https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/status/1316711967554506753
Boseley S. Antibody tests bought by UK government “less accurate than maker claims.” Guardian 2020 Nov 12. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/12/covid-antibody-test-bought-uk-government-less-accurate-than-makers-claim


Iacobucci G,
Coombes R

Covid-19: Government plans to spend £100bn on expanding testing to 10 million a day. BMJ2020;370:m3520. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3520 pmid:32907851
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzAvc2VwMDlfMTcvbTM1MjAiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&author[1]=R+Coombes&title=Covid-19:+Government+plans+to+spend+£100bn+on+expanding+testing+to+10+million+a+day&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=370)


Iacobucci G

Covid-19: mass population testing is rolled out in Liverpool. BMJ2020;371:m4268. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4268 pmid:33144291
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDNfMTIvbTQyNjgiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Covid-19:+mass+population+testing+is+rolled+out+in+Liverpool&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Iacobucci G

Covid-19: rapid test missed over 50% of positive cases in Manchester pilot. BMJ2020;371:m4323. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4323 pmid:33158908
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDZfMTQvbTQzMjMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Covid-19:+rapid+test+missed+over+50%+of+positive+cases+in+Manchester+pilot&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Mulchandani R,
Jones HE,
Taylor-Phillips S,
et al.,
EDSAB-HOME and COMPARE Investigators

Accuracy of UK Rapid Test Consortium (UK-RTC) “AbC-19 Rapid Test” for detection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in key workers: test accuracy study. BMJ2020;371:m4262.pmid:33177070
Abstract/FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi QUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTFfOC9tNDI2MiI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=R+Mulchandani&author[1]=HE+Jones&author[2]=S+Taylor-Phillips&author[3]=EDSAB-HOME and COMPARE Investigators&title=Accuracy+of+UK+Rapid+Test+Consortium+(UK-RTC)+“AbC-19+Rapid+Test”+for+detection+of+previous+SARS-CoV-2+infection+in+key+workers:+test+accuracy+study&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Gill D,
Ponsford MJ

Testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. BMJ2020;371:m4288. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4288
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTFfNS9tNDI4OCI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=D+Gill&author[1]=MJ+Ponsford&title=Testing+for+antibodies+to+SARS-CoV-2&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Armstrong S

Covid-19: Government buried negative data on its favoured antibody test. BMJ2020;371:m4353. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4353
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MTJfMTAvbTQzNTMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=S+Armstrong&title=Covid-19:+Government+buried+negative+data+on+its+favoured+antibody+test&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)
Cohen K, Kupferschmidt K. The “very, very bad look” of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug. Science 2020 Oct 28. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug
Transparency International. Corruption and covid-19—the story so far. 8 Jul 2020. https://www.transparency.org.uk/corruption-coronavirus-covid-19-latest
Ennals E. Government test tsar has £770,000 shares in drugs firm that sold us £13million of “pointless” antibody screening kits—after it emerged that Sir Patrick Vallance has a financial interest in company racing to find vaccine. Daily Mail 2020 Sep 26. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8776339/Test-tsar-770-000-shares-firm-sold-13million-pointless-antibody-screening-kits.html


Armstrong S

. Covid-19: Government faces legal action over £75m contract for antibody tests. BMJ2020;371:m4427. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4427
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTJfNy9tNDQyNyI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=S+Armstrong&title=Covid-19:+Government+faces+legal+action+over+£75m+contract+for+antibody+tests&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Mahase E

. Covid-19: Vaccine candidate may be more than 90% effective, interim results indicate. BMJ2020;371:m4347. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4347 pmid:33168562
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDlfMTYvbTQzNDciO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=E+Mahase&title=Covid-19:+Vaccine+candidate+may+be+more+than+90%+effective,+interim+results+indicate&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Bollyky TJ,
Kickbusch I

Preparing democracies for pandemics. BMJ2020;371:m4088. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4088 pmid:33097482
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvb2N0MjNfNy9tNDA4OCI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=TJ+Bollyky&author[1]=I+Kickbusch&title=Preparing+democracies+for+pandemics&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)



BMJ lashes out at UK ‘State Corruption (https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/bmj-lashes-out-at-uk-state-corruption-and-suppression-of-science/16/11/)’ and ‘Suppression of Science (https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/bmj-lashes-out-at-uk-state-corruption-and-suppression-of-science/16/11/)’
The highly-respected Medical Journal hit out at the "Politicization of Science" in an article lashing out at Tory Cronyism.

source (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full)

As most of Mainstream Media is 100% complicit you will most likely never find them discussing above insight & real news! ever ... The main reason why we all are in this mess in the first place ... if they did their job correctly the (globalist) control freaks would have no chance whatsoever.

cheers,
John

[ExomatrixTV]

When You Believe All The Propaganda

HKsDem1r4_A

[ExomatrixTV]

Viral Videos: Americans Reject The COVID-19 Mass Hysteria:

5feac486ebdd53187bce5947


source (https://banned.video/watch?id=5feac486ebdd53187bce5947)

[ExomatrixTV]

We need a rational approach to opposing the injections. Consider the following legal argument:

01. The injections are not vaccines.

02. The injections are experimental genetic manipulations.

03. Medical experimentation on humans is prohibited by the Nuremberg Code in the absence of full, complete and informed consent of the patient.

04. The manufacturers have admitted that the long term adverse effects of the injection are unknown. Therefore, it is impossible to provide anyone with complete information necessary for informed consent.

05. Under these circumstances, the injections are per se unlawful. Someone should sue to have them stopped.

06. If they can't be stopped, anyone injured by an injection should sue the manufacturer and argue that they are not immune from liability because the injections are not vaccines.


Vaccine: So Safe They Had to Give Pharma Legal Immunity, So Effective It Has to Be Coerced by Corporations


5fd7bf029677ad7de456ac48


source (https://banned.video/watch?id=5fd7bf029677ad7de456ac48)

[Eva2]

First Known US Case of new CCP Virus Strain Confirmed in Colorado:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-confirms-first-case-of-the-new-ccp-virus-strain-discovered-in-uk_3636068.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-29-4

[onawah]

Appeals Court Upholds Trump Rule Requiring Hospitals to Show Prices Upfront
BY MIMI NGUYEN LY
December 29, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-upholds-trump-rule-requiring-hospitals-to-show-prices-upfront_3636837.html

"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Tuesday upheld a Trump administration rule that requires hospitals to disclose the prices they negotiate with insurers for a range of health tests and procedures.

The 2-0 decision by the appeals court means that American patients will have access to hospital pricing information starting on Jan. 1, 2021, helping them find the lowest costs and the highest quality of care when deciding on treatment.

“This transformative hospital price transparency rule has been fought at every step by the swamp and defenders of the status quo,” White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement.

“Today’s ruling should reassure the American people that President Donald J. Trump refuses to bow to the influence of special interests who would prefer to keep patients in the dark. This initiative is just one in a series of rules that will bring unprecedented price transparency to all elements of healthcare,” she added.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the transparency rules in November 2019, calling on hospitals to make public the often-secret rates that they negotiate with insurance companies for all services, drugs, and supplies. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement at the time that hospitals must make public all standard hospital charges in a single data file.

The moves came as a result of Trump’s signing of an executive order in June 2019 over price transparency.

Hospitals, insurer organizations, and advocacy groups objected to the rules, and said that the Trump administration did not have authority to require the disclosures, which they held to be trade secrets. The hospitals also disputed that the policy would benefit consumers and lead to lower costs, arguing that compliance would instead be too burdensome and interfere with their care for patients.

The finalization of the rule prompted the American Hospital Association (AHA) to file a legal challenge. They argued that the White House didn’t have the authority to make the rule and in doing so had violated the First Amendment in its creation, and had acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner.

A federal judge ruled on June 23 that the Trump administration rules were legal. But the groups appealed on Oct. 15.

In the appeal, the groups said that the price transparency rules would pose a “herculean” and costly task of compiling health care costs, while reducing competition and causing confusion about patients’ out-of-pocket expenses.

Circuit Judge David Tatel, however, said concerns about the burdens “miss the mark,” and pointed to HHS Secretary Alex Azar’s findings that greater disclosures would benefit the “vast majority” of consumers and likely result in lower—not higher—prices.

“The Secretary weighed the rule’s costs and benefits and made a reasonable judgment that the benefits of easing the burden for consumers justified the added burdens imposed on hospitals,” Tatel wrote.

The latest decision upholds the June 23 ruling by U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols.

Melinda Hatton, the AHA’s general counsel, said the group was disappointed and hopes that a potential Biden administration would revise the rule and exercise “enforcement discretion” until the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic runs its course.

On Twitter, Azar praised the decision. “Big win for American patients today. The DC Circuit ruling is another major victory for President Trump’s transformative healthcare agenda. Starting January 1, Americans will have access to the actual prices paid for the most common hospital services,” he wrote.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supported the hospital groups, saying the rule could cause hospitals to demand higher prices for their services if they saw other hospitals charging more.

The case is American Hospital Association et al v. Azar, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 20-5193.

Janita Kan and Reuters contributed to this report."

(I thought this was interesting (beyond the apparent intended scope of the article) in that it looks like it will force hospitals to admit to the huge amounts they have been paid for (presumed) Covid cases.
That info has been discussed on the alternative internet, but I don't think it's been a focus much in the MSM.
And if that changes, which this case might make a possibility, it should raise a lot of eyebrows and questions.

[Phoenix1304]

A piece of BBC applied psychology over Christmas to deter any discussion that strays from the narrative. Essentially saying, listen to us and no-one else...with 600,000 now vaccinated guinea pigs in UK, and a new vaccine being rolled out, I guess it’s working to a certain extent. Try not to despair, we’ve got them worried obviously...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-55350794

[ExomatrixTV]

Irish Government Admits: COVID-19 Does NOT Exist

Written by Gemma O'Doherty


https://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/nnn-7.jpg?resize=550%2C231&ssl=1


After months of painstaking freedom of information law requests the government of Ireland has finally come clean and admitted that it has no scientific proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) exists. Which other nations are going to be next and admit this pandemic was a scam?

“AS PART OF OUR LEGAL ACTION we had been demanding the evidence that this virus actually exists [as well as] evidence that lockdowns actually have any impact on the spread of viruses; that face-masks are safe, and do deter the spread of viruses – They don’t. No such studies exist; that social distancing is based in science – It isn’t. it’s made up; that contact tracing has any bearing on the spread of a virus – of course it doesn’t. This organisation here – is making it up as they go along.” – Gemma O’Doherty

SEE VIDEO HERE (https://principia-scientific.com/irish-government-admits-covid-19-does-not-exist) originally streamed live from the office of Tony Holohan Chief Medical Officer of Ireland: GemmaODoherty.com (https://gemmaodoherty.com/)


Ireland Joins UK Govt. in Refusing to Confirm COVID19 Even Exists! (https://principia-scientific.com/ireland-joins-uk-govt-in-refusing-to-confirm-covid19-even-exists/)

source (https://principia-scientific.com/irish-government-admits-covid-19-does-not-exist)

[Tintin]

From the Vigilant Citizen website dated December 1st which, after undertaking a search here on "Kovid" didn't return a direct result, I'll post this here for now, and allow those of you interested to ponder its significance. If it has already put in an appearance then you can consider this a repeat:

Source: The Vigilant Citizen (https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/a-2019-project-runway-contestant-named-kovid-presented-a-facemask-outfit-video/)

A 2019 “Project Runway” Contestant Named Kovid Presented a Facemask Outfit (video)

An episode of “Project Runway” that aired in March 2019 featured a contestant named Kovid who presented an outfit featuring a matching facemask, similar to what we are seeing now due to the pandemic. Is this yet another case of predictive programming?

Published 4 weeks ago on December 1, 2020

https://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/leadrunway.png

Project Runway is a reality TV show about fashion design where contestants compete to create the best outfits. The show’s finalists prepare complete fashion collections for New York Fashion Week and, ultimately the judges choose a winner. If this description caused you to yawn in a prolonged and aggressive matter, I understand completely.

However, an episode of the 17th season of that show that aired on March 28th, 2019 is (in today’s context) completely mind-boggling.

In one segment, a contestant named Kovid Kapoor proudly presented an outfit that featured a matching facemask. Here’s the video:

tikwlE_r5gM

In this video, the judge says “I looove Kovid’s look”. It’s almost as if she was talking about the facemask look of the COVID pandemic.

She then asks the model to put the mask back on. When one judge asks “What do you think of this mask?”, another judge answers “It’s sick”. I realize that it’s an expression, but the choice of words remains stupefying. That same judge also says “Can you breathe in there?”.

One year later, a virus named COVID caused governments across the world to force people to wear facemasks. Also, in a weasely and underhanded matter, several un-elected “officials” have been hinting at the fact that mask mandates might remain effective after the pandemic. Since then, countless fashion designers created outfits with matching masks.

Coincidence?
Is this all a crazy, insane coincidence? Or is it yet another case of predictive programming? In the past months, I highlighted several pop culture products that predicted COVID-19 in bizarrely accurate detail such as the book The Eyes of Darkness, the movie Contagion, The Simpsons‘ clip about a “cat flu”, and the series Utopia. Is this Project Runway episode yet another example of the elite slyly preparing the public for its plans, maybe on a subconscious level?

[Tintin]

When Good Science is Suppressed by the Medical-Political Complex, People Die!

The coronavirus pandemic has “unleashed state corruption on a grand scale” that is “harmful to public health”, a scathing editorial in medical journal the BMJ has said.

In an unusually political intervention for the Highly-Respected Scientific Publication (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=hootsuite&utm_content=sme&utm_campaign=usage), it warns that politicians are “suppressing science” and accuses the government of “opportunistic embezzlement”.

“The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency – a time when it is even more important to safeguard science,” the article – penned by executive editor Kamran Abbasi – says.

Suppression of Science

It zeroes in on four examples of “suppression of science or scientists”. Firstly, the secrecy that initially surrounded the membership and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE), which were “initially secret until a press leak forced transparency”.

Referencing a bombshell story in the Guardian which revealed that Dominic Cummings, the prime minister’s departed chief adviser, sat in on SAGE meetings, “the leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers”, and exposed “under-representation from public health, clinical care, women and ethnic minorities”.
The editorial goes on to criticise Public Health England’s work on Covid-19 and inequality – “a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld” – and the blocking of a government scientist “from speaking to media because of a ‘difficult political landscape’”.

Finally, it points the finger at Operation Moonshot, which “depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests” and “the questionable logic of mass screening”.

Political interference

“Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification” Abbasi writes. “Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence.

“A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public.
“But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.”

Referencing accusations of cronyism at the heart of the government’s pandemic response, the BMJ claims that Johnson and his ministers have relied “too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture Covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments and vaccines”.

People Die

Earlier this year it emerged that the UK’s chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance has a £600,000 shareholding in drugs giant GlaxoSmithKline, which has been contracted to develop a Covid-19 vaccine.

“Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates,” the article says.

“Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.
“The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed.
“When good science is suppressed, people die.”

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-1) Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-2) The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office. 3 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-3) 4 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-4)

Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.5 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-5)6 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-6) Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-7)

Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-8) The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-9) It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test. 10 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-10) 11 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-11)

The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers. 12 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-12) 13 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-13)

Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office. 14 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-14)

Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.

Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.

Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. 15 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-15)

Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-16)

The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-17) Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-18)

How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.

Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.

Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-19)

The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money.

Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full#ref-20)

The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.

Footnotes


Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ's website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.


bmj.com/coronavirus/usage (https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage)


References:


Geoghegan P. Cronyism and clientelism. London Review of Books 2020 Nov 5. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n21/peter-geoghegan/cronyism-and-clientelism


Scally G,
Jacobson B,
Abbasi K

The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ2020;369:m1932. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1932 pmid:32414712
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNjkvbWF5MTVfMTcvbTE5MzIiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Scally&author[1]=B+Jacobson&author[2]=K+Abbasi&title=The+UK’s+public+health+response+to+covid-19&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=369)


Iacobucci G

Pandemic preparedness: Government must release 2016 report, says information commissioner. BMJ2020;371:m3953. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3953 pmid:33046458
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvb2N0MTJfNi9tMzk1MyI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Pandemic+preparedness:+Government+must+release+2016+report,+says+information+commissioner&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)
Department of Health and Social Care. Policy paper. Annex B: Exercise Cygnus report. 5 Nov 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-pandemic-preparedness/exercise-cygnus-report-accessible-report
Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf


Khunti K,
Platt L,
Routen A,
Abbasi K

Covid-19 and ethnic minorities: an urgent agenda for overdue action. BMJ2020;369:m2503. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2503 pmid:32576558
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNjkvanVuMjNfMTUvbTI1MDMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=K+Khunti&author[1]=L+Platt&author[2]=A+Routen&author[3]=K+Abbasi&title=Covid-19+and+ethnic+minorities:+an+urgent+agenda+for+overdue+action&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=369)
Horton R. Tweet, 15 Oct 2020. https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/status/1316711967554506753
Boseley S. Antibody tests bought by UK government “less accurate than maker claims.” Guardian 2020 Nov 12. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/12/covid-antibody-test-bought-uk-government-less-accurate-than-makers-claim


Iacobucci G,
Coombes R

Covid-19: Government plans to spend £100bn on expanding testing to 10 million a day. BMJ2020;370:m3520. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3520 pmid:32907851
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzAvc2VwMDlfMTcvbTM1MjAiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&author[1]=R+Coombes&title=Covid-19:+Government+plans+to+spend+£100bn+on+expanding+testing+to+10+million+a+day&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=370)


Iacobucci G

Covid-19: mass population testing is rolled out in Liverpool. BMJ2020;371:m4268. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4268 pmid:33144291
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDNfMTIvbTQyNjgiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Covid-19:+mass+population+testing+is+rolled+out+in+Liverpool&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Iacobucci G

Covid-19: rapid test missed over 50% of positive cases in Manchester pilot. BMJ2020;371:m4323. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4323 pmid:33158908
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDZfMTQvbTQzMjMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=G+Iacobucci&title=Covid-19:+rapid+test+missed+over+50%+of+positive+cases+in+Manchester+pilot&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Mulchandani R,
Jones HE,
Taylor-Phillips S,
et al.,
EDSAB-HOME and COMPARE Investigators

Accuracy of UK Rapid Test Consortium (UK-RTC) “AbC-19 Rapid Test” for detection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in key workers: test accuracy study. BMJ2020;371:m4262.pmid:33177070
Abstract/FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi QUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTFfOC9tNDI2MiI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=R+Mulchandani&author[1]=HE+Jones&author[2]=S+Taylor-Phillips&author[3]=EDSAB-HOME and COMPARE Investigators&title=Accuracy+of+UK+Rapid+Test+Consortium+(UK-RTC)+“AbC-19+Rapid+Test”+for+detection+of+previous+SARS-CoV-2+infection+in+key+workers:+test+accuracy+study&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Gill D,
Ponsford MJ

Testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. BMJ2020;371:m4288. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4288
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTFfNS9tNDI4OCI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=D+Gill&author[1]=MJ+Ponsford&title=Testing+for+antibodies+to+SARS-CoV-2&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Armstrong S

Covid-19: Government buried negative data on its favoured antibody test. BMJ2020;371:m4353. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4353
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MTJfMTAvbTQzNTMiO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=S+Armstrong&title=Covid-19:+Government+buried+negative+data+on+its+favoured+antibody+test&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)
Cohen K, Kupferschmidt K. The “very, very bad look” of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug. Science 2020 Oct 28. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug
Transparency International. Corruption and covid-19—the story so far. 8 Jul 2020. https://www.transparency.org.uk/corruption-coronavirus-covid-19-latest
Ennals E. Government test tsar has £770,000 shares in drugs firm that sold us £13million of “pointless” antibody screening kits—after it emerged that Sir Patrick Vallance has a financial interest in company racing to find vaccine. Daily Mail 2020 Sep 26. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8776339/Test-tsar-770-000-shares-firm-sold-13million-pointless-antibody-screening-kits.html


Armstrong S

. Covid-19: Government faces legal action over £75m contract for antibody tests. BMJ2020;371:m4427. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4427
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvbm92MTJfNy9tNDQyNyI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=S+Armstrong&title=Covid-19:+Government+faces+legal+action+over+£75m+contract+for+antibody+tests&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Mahase E

. Covid-19: Vaccine candidate may be more than 90% effective, interim results indicate. BMJ2020;371:m4347. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4347 pmid:33168562
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNzEvbm92MDlfMTYvbTQzNDciO3M6 NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMzoiL2Jtai8zNzEvYm1qLm00NDI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=E+Mahase&title=Covid-19:+Vaccine+candidate+may+be+more+than+90%+effective,+interim+results+indicate&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)


Bollyky TJ,
Kickbusch I

Preparing democracies for pandemics. BMJ2020;371:m4088. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4088 pmid:33097482
FREE Full Text (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoi RlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzEvb2N0MjNfNy9tNDA4OCI7czo0 OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIzOiIvYm1qLzM3MS9ibWoubTQ0MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)Google Scholar (https://www.bmj.com/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=TJ+Bollyky&author[1]=I+Kickbusch&title=Preparing+democracies+for+pandemics&publication_year=2020&journal=BMJ&volume=371)



BMJ lashes out at UK ‘State Corruption (https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/bmj-lashes-out-at-uk-state-corruption-and-suppression-of-science/16/11/)’ and ‘Suppression of Science (https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/bmj-lashes-out-at-uk-state-corruption-and-suppression-of-science/16/11/)’
The highly-respected Medical Journal hit out at the "Politicization of Science" in an article lashing out at Tory Cronyism.

source (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425.full)

As most of Mainstream Media is 100% complicit you will most likely never find them discussing above insight & real news! ever ... The main reason why we all are in this mess in the first place ... if they did their job correctly the (globalist) control freaks would have no chance whatsoever.

cheers,
John


:bump:

Thanks for this post and I'm pretty sure I've already shared the article. Still, excellent references here ( :thumbsup: ) many of which I've had shortlisted for upload to the library for a while now. As soon as she's up and running again I'll action that.

[ExomatrixTV]

DIANA LENSKA: THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028 JOHN HOPKINS FUTURE SCENARIO REPORT

5B3gXR8Q6Wcx/


source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/5B3gXR8Q6Wcx/)

When do people (the masses) finally FACE THIS? Probably when it is too late and blame others for doing nothing.

[ExomatrixTV]

The Biggest Problem With C0VlD V@ccin3s is the inability to even question them (https://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck/videos/189690699520651)!

BenSwannRealityCheck (https://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck)

[ExomatrixTV]

Andrew Yang Calls for Barcodes To Identify Vaccinated People (https://www.westernjournal.com/andrew-yang-calls-barcodes-identify-vaccinated-people)

MUST SEE: Rand Paul Goes OFF on Governors Who Used the Health Crisis to their Advantage:
bhVtiH0v73c


🌐 tinyurl.com/2021-Technocracy-Forecast (http://tinyurl.com/2021-Technocracy-Forecast)

[ExomatrixTV]

Tedros Adhanom: WHO Chief (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/who-chief-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-may-face-genocide-charges-2fbfz7sff) face Genocide Charges
ICC complaint (https://ethiopoint.com/icc-complaint-to-be-filed-against-tedros-adhanom) filed against Tedros Adhanom

[Eva2]

2021: Alien injection takes over every cell in your body.

'Alex Jones illustrates what the dangerous COVID mRNA vaccine is made out of and how it will reprogram as many cells in your body as possible, leaving you as some sort of alien creature- not human anymore.'


https://theresistance.video/watch?id=5fee55015b1d5820e13859a3

[pueblo]

If we can break the unanimity of belief in the narrative been forced on us we have a chance to wake people up.

NyDDyT1lDhA

[Eva2]

I thought this was a good interview/exchange between Alex Jones and Robert Barnes on election updates, rally in Washington and lockdowns. At just before 25 minutes, there is a clip of an arrest in Quebec, Canada where a neighbour "snitched" on a neighbour who had 5 people gathered in their home for the holidays and a 'Gestapo' type police raid follows. Another clip shows an arrest at around the 34 min. mark of a patriot in the UK being arrested in her home, and at around 41 min mark, more strong armed police takedown of people (U.S.) caught on the street at night.


https://theresistance.video/watch?id=5ff0ff3c70e608257de32e98

[Ernie Nemeth]

I conform only for one reason, the figurative gun to my head at all times...

I don't care what others think. It does not change my opinion regardless. Especially if I think I am right. In the video above I would have stormed out when told I had been duped and used in an experiment. And I probably would have broken a few things on the way out. I do not like being used for any reason whatsoever. But it does show why we are in the mess we are in. People will not stand up for what they believe.

People see me coming and they go, oh no here comes Ernie. No more bull**** will stand. It's my rep. I'm not much loved for it, that's for sure. And little of what I say is even accepted as an opinion, it's just bunk to most. Sad, sad times indeed.

[greybeard]

How Wikipedia is Used as a Weapon Dr Vernon Coleman


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suvF8ZaIJUU Vernon

Make no Mistake - This is Genocide


https://brandnewtube.com/watch/make-no-mistake-this-is-genocide_kJBRkPY1j7MupJl.html

[pueblo]

People are going to start dying from the mRNA vaccine in the coming months...

Dxjp6nkwhWn8/

[greybeard]

Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and David Scott with today's UK Column News.


https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-4th-january-2021

[pueblo]

Human race get up off your knees!

https://twitter.com/UK_UNIFICATION/status/1345817605358161921?s=20

[sunnydaze]

good to see uk column on here thankyou

[greybeard]

good to see uk column on here thankyou

Yes professional journalists.
Most of their episodes get posted here on this thead sunnydaze.
Chris

[ExomatrixTV]

Ever seen celebrities & politicians bragging about "taking the shot" promoting & helping to PUSH (indirect) mandatory vaccines agenda?

We are being FOOLED on so many levels ... Lets add this one (https://www.facebook.com/johnn.kuhless/posts/415329783244626) to the long list of "Weapons of Mass Deceptions" shall we?



By the way: Even if they use real syringes you have NO PROOF what ingredients they use versus what toxins we are pushed to take!

415329383244666
source (https://www.facebook.com/johnn.kuhless/posts/415329783244626)

[thepainterdoug]

Not sure how many follow Paul Craig Roberts? Im on his email list and get 3-4 articles a day. Paul is on it big time regarding covid and election fraud.
this is an update on the covid fraud.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/01/05/the-covid-deception-updated/

[Denis]

American pharmacist Stephen Brandenburg, 44, who deliberately spoiled a batch of coronavirus vaccine, believed that it could harm people and change their DNA. This is reported by Business Insider with reference to the court materials.

The incident took place in Wisconsin, in the town of Grafton. A former Aurora Health Care employee removed about 500 doses of Moderna vaccine from the refrigerator and left them outside overnight, rendering the drug unusable

Read more on RBC:
https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/5ff46e2e9a794758fb1340a7

[Hughe]

Review update of recent science relevant to COVID-19 policy: Denis Rancourt, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca)

Measures do not prevent deaths, transmission is not by contact, masks provide no benefit, vaccines are inherently dangerous:
Review update of recent science relevant to COVID-19 policy

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD
Researcher, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca)
Member scientist, PANDA (pandata.org)
[ See section about the author's expertise, at the end ]

The article is organized into the following sections:
Summary
Introduction - Iatrogenic pandemic of panic
Stringency of measures has no effect on total deaths assigned to COVID-19
Corruption of science is being exposed - Masks and PCR
Transmission is not by contact
Masking of the general-population provides no detectable benefit
Vaccines are inherently dangerous
Endnotes / References

Excerpt:

Vaccines are inherently dangerous
On 13 July 2020, an important reality check was published by Arvin et al. [33] in the pages of the leading scientific journal Nature, in the form of an extensive "Perspective" (review). The paper, on careful reading, is a detailed exposé about human ignorance regarding artificial interference with the human immune system. Any student of science should conclude that "we mostly don't know anything". The authors state this in embellished form as [33]:
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a general concern for the development of vaccines and antibody therapies because the mechanisms that underlie antibody protection against any virus have a theoretical potential to amplify the infection or trigger harmful immunopathology. This possibility requires careful consideration at this critical point in the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here we review observations relevant to the risks of ADE of disease, and their potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 infection. At present, there are no known clinical findings, immunological assays or biomarkers that can differentiate any severe viral infection from immune-enhanced disease, whether by measuring antibodies, T cells or intrinsic host responses. In vitro systems and animal models do not predict the risk of ADE of disease, in part because protective and potentially detrimental antibody-mediated mechanisms are the same and designing animal models depends on understanding how antiviral host responses may become harmful in humans. The implications of our lack of knowledge are twofold. First, comprehensive studies are urgently needed to define clinical correlates of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Second, because ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies—regardless of what virus is the causative agent—it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward. (Abstract)

Given the roll out that followed, this means that we have blindly embarked on a large-scale experiment on human subjects, without animal trials, without scientific transparency, without the possibility of informed consent, driven by pharmaceutical corporations that only want the good of humanity.
On 1 October 2020, Wehenkel [34] published a paper in which he studied 39 countries and found a large association between national influenza vaccination rate (IVR) of people 65 years and older and reported COVID-19 deaths per million inhabitants. The results are preliminary but may be a documented example of "antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease" involving COVID-19. All the highest COVID-19 death rates occurred in countries with IVR > 50% (see his figures 1 and 3). I sense a research funding opportunity to undo this finding.

Endnotes / References

[1] 2019--WHO : “Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza”, with Annex, World Health Organization, October 2019 : https://www.who.int/influenza/publications/public_health_measures/publication/en/ . Report, ISBN: 978-92-4-151683-9, pp 91, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf / “Annex: Report of systematic literature reviews”, WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2019.1, pp 125, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329439/WHO-WHE-IHM-GIP-2019.1-eng.pdf

[2] 2017--WHO : “PANDEMIC INFLUENZA SEVERITY ASSESSMENT (PISA): A WHO guide to assess the severity of influenza in seasonal epidemics & pandemics”, World health Organization, May 2017, WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2017.2, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259392/WHO-WHE-IHM-GIP-2017.2-eng.pdf
21

[3] 2011--Bonneux : Luc Bonneux & Wim Van Damme. “Health is more than influenza”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization2011;89:539-540. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089086. https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/

[4] 2010--Cohen : Cohen, D. and Carter, P. “WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies””. BMJ 2010; 340:c2912. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010). https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/340/7759/Feature.full.pdf

[5] 2020--Rancourt : “Masks Don’t Work: a Review of Science Relevant to Covid-19 Social Policy”. Rancourt, DG (11 April 2020) ResearchGate, obtained 400 K reads, then was deplatformed, as per this report: https://archive.org/details/covid-censorship-at-research-gate-2/. Now at: https://vixra.org/abs/2006.0044 , and at: https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy . And see the Digi-Debates about criticism of the article: “Digi-Debates. The Face Mask Debate”, Digi Debates YouTube Channel, 25 July 2020, https://youtu.be/AQyLFdoeUNk , and at: https://www.digi-debates.com/ .

[6] 2020--Rancourt : “Face masks, lies, damn lies, and public health officials: "A growing body of evidence"”. ResearchGate (3 August 2020). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25042.58569 - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343399832_Face_masks_lies_damn_lies_and_public_health_officials_A_growing_body_of_evidence

[7] 2020--Rancourt : “All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”, by Rancourt, DG (2 June 2020)ResearchGate. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24350.77125 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response

[8] 2020--Rancourt : D. G. Rancourt, Marine Baudin, Jérémie Mercier. “Evaluation of the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 in France, from all-cause mortality 1946-2020”. ResearchGate(20 August 2020). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16836.65920/1 - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343775235_Evaluation_of_the_virulence_of_SARS-CoV-2_in_France_from_all-cause_mortality_1946-2020

[9] 2020--Chaudhry : Chaudhry, Rabail et al. (2020) “A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes”. EClinicalMedicine, Volume 25, 100464 (21 July 2020) -https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext
22

[10] 2020--De Larochelambert : De Larochelambert Q, Marc A, Antero J, Le Bourg E and Toussaint J-F (2020). “Covid-19 Mortality: A Matter of Vulnerability Among Nations Facing Limited Margins of Adaptation”. Frontiers in Public Health8:604339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339 (19 November 2020). - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339/full

[11] 2020--AIER : “Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence”. AIER Staff.American Institute for Economic Research. December 19, 2020. -https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-do-not-control-the-coronavirus-the-evidence/

[12] 2020--Yam : Kai Chi Yam, Joshua Conrad Jackson, Christopher M. Barnes, Jenson Lau, Xin Qin, Hin Yeung Lee. “The rise of COVID-19 cases is associated with support for world leaders”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Oct 2020, 117 (41) 25429-25433; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009252117 - https://www.pnas.org/content/117/41/25429.full

[13] 2020--Abbasi : Abbasi, Kamran (executive editor). “Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science”. British Medical Journal. BMJ 2020; 371 :m4425. - https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

[14] 2020--Gandhi : Monica Gandhi and George W. Rutherford. “Facial Masking for Covid-19 — Potential for “Variolation” as We Await a Vaccine”. October 29, 2020. N Engl J Med2020; 383:e101. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2026913 -https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2026913

[15] 2020--Rasmussen : Angela L. Rasmussen et al. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (criticism of Gandhi et al.)

[16] 2020--Brosseau : Lisa M. Brosseau et al. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (criticism of Gandhi et al.)

[17] 2020--Gandhi : Monica Gandhi and George W. Rutherford. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (reply of Gandhi et al.)

[18] 2020--IHME : IHME COVID-19 Forecasting Team., Reiner, R.C., Barber, R.M. et al. “Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States”. Nature Medicine(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1132-9 - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1132-9

[19] 2020--Magness : Phillip W. Magness. “Case for mask mandate rests on bad data”. Wall Street Journal (11 November 2020). - https://www.wsj.com/articles/case-for-mask-mandate-rests-on-bad-data-11605113310
23

[20] 2020--Corman : Corman Victor M, Landt Olfert, Kaiser Marco, Molenkamp Richard, Meijer Adam, Chu Daniel KW, Bleicker Tobias, Brünink Sebastian, Schneider Julia, Schmidt Marie Luisa, Mulders Daphne GJC, Haagmans Bart L, van der Veer Bas, van den Brink Sharon, Wijsman Lisa, Goderski Gabriel, Romette Jean-Louis, Ellis Joanna, Zambon Maria, Peiris Malik, Goossens Herman, Reusken Chantal, Koopmans Marion PG, Drosten Christian. “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”. Euro Surveill.2020;25(3):pii=2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

[21] 2020--Borger : Borger, Pieter et al. "Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 - External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results". International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS). 27 November 2020. - https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

[22] 2020--Singanayagam : Singanayagam Anika, Patel Monika, Charlett Andre, Lopez Bernal Jamie, Saliba Vanessa, Ellis Joanna, Ladhani Shamez, Zambon Maria, Gopal Robin. “Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020”. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(32):pii=2001483.https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483

[23] 2020--Jaafar : Jaafar R, Aherfi S, Wurtz N, Grimaldier C, Hoang VT, Colson P, Raoult D, La Scola B. “Correlation between 3790 qPCR positives samples and positive cell cultures including 1941 SARS-CoV-2 isolates”. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 28:ciaa1491. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1491. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32986798; PMCID: PMC7543373. -https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

[24] 2020--Meyerowitz : Eric A. Meyerowitz, Aaron Richterman, Rajesh T. Gandhi, et al. “Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Review of Viral, Host, and Environmental Factors”. Ann Intern Med. [Epub ahead of print 17 September 2020]. doi:10.7326/M20-5008 - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M20-5008

[25] 2020--CBC--The Canadian Press : “Health Canada recalls more than 50 hand sanitizers in evolving list”. (5 August 2020). -https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/sanitizer-recall-expands-canada-1.5675182

[26] 2009--WHO : “Natural ventilation for infection control in health-care settings - WHO guidelines 2009”. Editors: James Atkinson, Yves Chartier, Carmen Lúcia Pessoa-Silva, Paul Jensen, Yuguo Li and Wing-Hong Seto, pp 106, 2009, ISBN: 978 92 4 154785 7 - https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/natural_ventilation/en/
24

[27] 2007--Li : Li Y, Leung GM, Tang JW, Yang X, Chao CY, Lin JZ, Lu JW, Nielsen PV, Niu J, Qian H, Sleigh AC, Su HJ, Sundell J, Wong TW, Yuen PL. “Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment - a multidisciplinary systematic review”. Indoor Air. 2007 Feb;17(1):2-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00445.x. PMID: 17257148.

[28] 2020--Letizia : Letizia AG, Ramos I, Obla A, Goforth C, Weir DL, Ge Y, Bamman MM, Dutta J, Ellis E, Estrella L, George MC, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Graham WD, van de Guchte A, Gutierrez R, Jones F, Kalomoiri A, Lizewski R, Lizewski S, Marayag J, Marjanovic N, Millar EV, Nair VD, Nudelman G, Nunez E, Pike BL, Porter C, Regeimbal J, Rirak S, Santa Ana E, Sealfon RSG, Sebra R, Simons MP, Soares-Schanoski A, Sugiharto V, Termini M, Vangeti S, Williams C, Troyanskaya OG, van Bakel H, Sealfon SC. “SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Marine Recruits during Quarantine”. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2407-2416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029717. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PMID: 33176093; PMCID: PMC7675690. (11 November 2020) - https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717

[29] 2018--Brown : “ONA wins second arbitration against hospitals on ‘vaccinate or mask’ policy” (13 September 2018), Canadian Lawyer Magazine. - https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/privacy-and-data/ona-wins-second-arbitration-against-hospitals-on-vaccinate-or-mask-policy/275455

[30] 2020--Bundgaard : Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, von Buchwald C, Todsen T, Norsk JB, Pries-Heje MM, Vissing CR, Nielsen PB, Winsløw UC, Fogh K, Hasselbalch R, Kristensen JH, Ringgaard A, Porsborg Andersen M, Goecke NB, Trebbien R, Skovgaard K, Benfield T, Ullum H, Torp-Pedersen C, Iversen K. “Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 18:M20-6817. doi: 10.7326/M20-6817. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33205991; PMCID: PMC7707213. - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

[31] 2020--Fikenzer : Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, Hepp P, Laufs U. “Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity”. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec;109(12):1522-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6. PMID: 32632523; PMCID: PMC7338098. -https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y

[32] 2020--Borovoy : Boris Borovoy, Colleen Huber, Maria Crisler. “Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks”. Primary Doctor Medical Journal. November 2020. - https://pdmj.org/
25

[33] 2020--Arvin : Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, Cathcart A, Spreafico R, Havenar-Daughton C, Lanzavecchia A, Corti D, Virgin HW. “A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2”. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):353-363. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8. Epub 2020 Jul 13. PMID: 32659783. -https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8[34] 2020--Wehenkel : Wehenkel C. 2020. “Positive association between COVID-19 deaths and influenza vaccination rates in elderly people worldwide”. PeerJ 8:e10112 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10112

[Savannah]

Sorry if this has already been posted

https://endoftheamericandream.com/this-is-why-the-new-mutant-covid-strain-that-is-ravaging-south-africa-has-scientists-extremely-worried/
This Is Why The New Mutant COVID Strain That Is Ravaging South Africa Has Scientists Extremely Worried…
January 4, 2021

Over the past couple of weeks, the new coronavirus strain known as “Super COVID” has been racing through the UK and making headlines all over the globe, but scientists insist that the new mutant COVID strain in South Africa is potentially much more dangerous. Just like “Super COVID” in the UK, there is evidence that the South African strain spreads faster, and South Africa’s health minister has warned that there is “anecdotal evidence” of a “larger proportion of younger patients with no co-morbidities presenting with critical illness”. But the biggest reason why health authorities are so concerned about this particular strain is because it has mutated so dramatically that the current vaccines that have been developed may not work against it. The following comes from a Reuters article entitled “UK scientists worry vaccines may not protect against S.African coronavirus variant”…

UK scientists expressed concern on Monday that COVID-19 vaccines being rolled out in Britain may not be able to protect against a new variant of the coronavirus that emerged in South Africa and has spread internationally.

Both Britain and South Africa have detected new, more transmissible variants of the COVID-19-causing virus in recent weeks that have driven a surge in cases. British Health Secretary Matt Hancock said on Monday he was now very worried about the variant identified in South Africa.

Even though the UK is the epicenter of the “Super COVID” outbreak, the British are so alarmed by the South African strain that they have banned all flights from South Africa. In an interview with the BBC, Hancock admitted that he is “incredibly worried” about what is happening in South Africa right now…
I’m incredibly worried about the South African variant, and that’s why we took the action that we did to restrict all flights from South Africa,” he told the BBC’s “Today” program.

“This is a very, very significant problem … and it’s even more of a problem than the U.K. new variant.”

As the Daily Mail recently explained, the vaccines that have already been developed are designed to get the body to identify COVID’s “spike protein”, and if this does not happen they will not work properly…

Covid vaccines – including the Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford University/AstraZeneca jabs currently being rolled out across Britain – work by training the body to spot the virus’s spike protein.

If the spike mutates so much that it becomes unrecognizable then it could render vaccines useless or make them less potent.

Scientists are telling us that the new mutant strain in South Africa has a total of eight changes to the spike protein, and Dr. John Bell of Oxford University is calling them “pretty substantial changes”…

Dr. John Bell of Oxford University said Sunday the variant identified in South Africa was worrisome in this regard, however.

“They both have multiple, different mutations in them, so they’re not a single mutation,” he told Times Radio. “And the mutations associated with the South African form are really pretty substantial changes in the structure of the (virus’ spike) protein.”

At this moment, we do not know if the current vaccines will be rendered useless by this new mutant strain or not.

But it is being reported that early tests have shown that at least one of the mutations appears to have made the virus more resistant to antibodies…

One, called E484K, is particularly alarming, Dr Richard Lessells, an infectious-disease specialist at the KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, told the Wall Street Journal.

When he and his team tested antibodies from donated plasma or lab made ones against that mutated bit of the virus variant, the immune cells were less effective.

Of course much more testing needs to be done, and those tests are being conducted right now.

According to a top official in the UK, scientists may be able to come to some sort of a conclusion in a couple of weeks…

Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s deputy chief medical officer, said in response to a question from POLITICO on December 30 that this work can take 12 to 14 days, and that it may be a couple of weeks before scientists can give “a solid steer” on whether the vaccines will be effective on new variants.

So it may be a while before we know for sure if the current vaccines will be effective against this frightening new mutant strain in South Africa or not.

But what we do know is that this new strain is rapidly becoming dominant in large portions of South Africa…

The variant, 501.V2, is more infectious than the original COVID-19 virus and has rapidly become dominant in South Africa’s coastal areas. It is expected that the variant will quickly become dominant inland in Johannesburg, the country’s largest city, and the surrounding Gauteng province, he said.

If it is becoming dominant there, there is a good chance that it will become dominant as it spreads elsewhere as well.

In recent days, two cases of the South African strain have been confirmed in the UK, and there have also been cases detected in Finland, Switzerland and Australia.

Then on Monday, a case popped up in Austria…

On Monday, Austria announced that it had discovered one case of the South African mutation in a 30-year-old woman who returned from a trip on Dec. 6.

And officials in Japan just announced that a case has been identified in their country…
So it appears that the cat is already out of the bag.

A whole host of nations have already put travel restrictions in place to try to keep this deadly new strain from spreading more widely.

But so far the U.S. is not among them. In fact, testing is not even required for people traveling to the U.S. from South Africa.

Just like we have seen with “Super COVID”, it is probably just a matter of time before the South African strain spreads all over the planet.

And if the current vaccines will not work against it, that will put scientists back to square one in fighting this pandemic.

Of course there are tens of millions of people in the United States that will never take any COVID vaccine under any circumstances. Many are deeply concerned about the potential long-term effects of these experimental mRNA vaccines, and there is still so much that we do not know about them.

These are such troubled times, and the “perfect storm” that started in 2020 is only going to get worse in 2021. Scientists thought that the new vaccines would give them the upper hand in dealing with this pandemic, but that may not be the case after all.

And as COVID continues to mutate, it is inevitable that there will be even more surprises for our health authorities in the months ahead…

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 6th January 2021



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yoqlbn9Ts0

[ExomatrixTV]

The FDA, WHO & Fauci Finally Admit Something HUGE About COVID-19 & MSM Ignored It!

tcY71NUi4Sc

[DaveToo]

The FDA, WHO & Fauci Finally Admit Something HUGE About COVID-19 & MSM Ignored It!



We learned scholars here at Avalon have known since May of last year that simply adjusting the number of PCR cycles will dramatically alter the number of CV 'cases'.

And it still holds going forward. If there is a need for more or less cases (vis-a-vis the vaccine)
then directives will go out to governments worldwide to adjust their PCR machines.
Brilliant! Just Brilliant!

[meat suit]

this is a paper on a study of around 10m people in Wuhan.
from what I gather, asymptomatic positives are not infectious...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

Results
There were 10,652,513 eligible people aged ≥6 years in Wuhan
(94.1% of the total population). The nucleic acid screening was
completed in 19 days (from May 14, 2020 to Jun 1, 2020), and
tested a total of 9,899,828 persons from the 10,652,513 eligible
people (participation rate, 92.9%). Of the 9899,828 participants,
9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19, and 34,424
were recovered COVID-19 patients.
The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of
COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and
identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of
0.303 (95% CI 0.270–0.339)/10,000. The median age-stratified Ct-
values of the asymptomatic cases were shown in Supplementary
Table 1. Of the 300 asymptomatic positive cases, two cases came
from one family and another two were from another family.
There were no previously confirmed COVID-19 patients in these
two families. A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic
positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the
COVID-19. There were 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19
cases who participated in the screening. Of the 34,424 partici-
pants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again,
giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423–0.574%).
Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and
repositive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases
detected in this study.

[onawah]

Vaxxed v. Unvaxxed: Lawsuit Seeks to Protect Americans From Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status
1/6/21
By Greg Glaser, Esq.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaxxed-unvaxxed-lawsuit-protect-americans-from-vaccination-status-discrimination/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"In a federal complaint filed last month in the U.S. District Court of California, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores presented results of a pilot study showing unvaccinated adults and children are healthier than their vaccinated counterparts.
On George Washington’s birthday, Feb. 22, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores will be in federal court in Sacramento to request an order immediately protecting all Americans from discrimination based on vaccination status.

Glaser and Flores represent The Control Group, which is a recently completed pilot survey of unvaccinated Americans showing 1,248% better health for unvaccinated adults and 1,099% better health for unvaccinated children.

In the federal complaint filed December 2020 in the U.S. District Court of California — Eastern District, Sacramento, Glaser and Flores state:

“As a matter of national security, this constitutional case is respectfully brought by scientifically focused patriotic Americans, including United States military family members. The American population is currently in the process of being decimated by chronic illness, due to injured and dysfunctional immune systems … The Control Group dataset provides profound proof that vaccine exposure is in fact the primary cause of this nation’s current public health crisis.”

According to Glaser, here is the case in a nutshell:

“America is dying from the current trajectory of chronic illness. Our Control Group pilot survey proved it is the vaccines causing our nation’s demise. And even the government’s own admissions make it clear vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. There is no single agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that can be petitioned to heal the whole nation, nor a single law such as SB277 that can be overturned to heal this nation from the current trajectory. That is why Ray Flores and I are requesting comprehensive relief in the form of an executive order preventing discrimination based on vaccination status. If we prevail, then every American will be protected from mandatory vaccination.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Vax-Chart-1024x790.png

Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden.

Judicial Notice #1 connects all these chronic illnesses (i.e., digestive disorders, diabetes) to the immune system with the most authoritative citations on the planet.

Judicial Notice #2 shows that vaccines are dangerous and untested — once again all of these are authoritative citations the government cannot dispute.

And Judicial Notice #3 shows how vaccines are made and distributed through communist China.
Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden."

[DaveToo]

this is a paper on a study of around 10m people in Wuhan.
from what I gather, asymptomatic positives are not infectious...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

Results
There were 10,652,513 eligible people aged ≥6 years in Wuhan
(94.1% of the total population). The nucleic acid screening was
completed in 19 days (from May 14, 2020 to Jun 1, 2020),

Yes that has become a now classic CV testing study.

The problem is that it is considered bogus by the western medical establishment
because they didn't use the officially approved Covid PCR test!

[Baby Steps]

The following comments from a UK doctor, it is important to remember that in the current UK peak, our hospitals have become a meat grinder for their own staff. She has said that she fears for the sanity of colleagues, and some may even be a suicide risk.

So far in the UK more than 600 NHS staff have died from the virus.


Imagine you are part of a medical response to a terrorist attack with a few hundred casualties. You start your 13 hour shift already exhausted. All you can do is triage and treat what's in front of you.You have limited resources, your colleagues are doing the same thing, separately from you.

The picture is constantly changing and no one person on the scene has any real handle on the whole situation.

There are no ambulances or facilities to transfer patients to other places for care.

You are very hot and sweating in full PPE. You are not able to drink, eat or pee for the whole shift. Your colleagues are showing signs of severe stress and at best are grumpy and unpleasant, at worst breaking down with no-one to support them.

At the end of your 13 hour shift, you hand over to the next exhausted looking team.

You try to make up for the severe dehydration by downing litres of water to improve your headache. You go home from your shift to hear comments on coronavirus being a hoax, empty hospital conspiracies, money grabbing doctors, and how 'I am not going to stay at home because ts my right to go out, and nobody is going to stop me' .

You get some patchy disturbed sleep, and go back the next day to do it all over again. And repeat for 3 Months. That's what its like.

Health workers are also victims in all this. They continue the struggle because they care about patients and colleagues. What procedures and drugs they use are determined higher up. The only good news I have heard is that this time round, fewer cases are needing ventilation, the virus appears weaker, they are allowed to damp the cytokine storm with steriods, most have access to oxygen and death rates are lower.

The following emerging protocol may help, but there is huge inertia in the medical systems (or worse) when cheap therapeutics are proposed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6A6RFDprIs

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 8th January 2021

Quite a bit about the protest in USA
Chris


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6UAGpRGcQM

[Deborah (ahamkara)]

Hospital staffing has been kept at a bare minimum for many years to increase profits. In an effienct system, adequate resources could be shifted to accommodate more Covid patients- so no staff should be working 13 hour shifts. Our local Kaiser hospital is EMPTY, except for Covid patients. Nurses have been transferred in to accommodate added ICU beds. It is not the hell on Earth frequently described by mainstream media with a narrative to enforce. Speaking directly with nurses, they will verify it is very old, the very sick, the obese and the unhealthy dying from this. Young, healthy people are NOT at great risk. The current narrative is twisted to support Big Pharma and an economic reset. There is a virus, but it is NOT the reason we are in lockdown. There is a reason up to 60% are refusing the vaccine.

[One]

FLORIDA DOCTOR'S DEATH AFTER RECEIVING COVID-19 VACCINE SPARKS INVESTIGATION
K1TSJWLFzD1a

[ExomatrixTV]

Collapse of the 2020s - A Positive Course of Action:

kME4TKsEBSw

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 11th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqGF-IjbbGo

In order to beat the virus and save the NHS the plan is to limit people to one leaving the house a week and the bubble to cease to exist -- no home visits and no meeting friends outside, Thats not law yet but it is planned
Supermarkets to ban admittance to non mask wearers without a medical certificate.
Anyone who thinks this is about saving peoples lives need their heads looked
And on it goes.
Chris

'Leave Home Once A Week


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndtDTqmHcIA

[Tintin]

UK Column News received the following letter from an active serving officer (Constable) in the police force and it has been published under anonymity, for reasons that will become clear from reading it.

It's a very timely reminder that not all the police here in the UK are content with what is going on, and what is being asked of them. The great majority of them are decent individuals doing a quite difficult job at the moment.

I've maintained for a while now that if enough of them did step forward and refused to follow briefings that a big move towards undermining these proven ineffective and unnecessary regulations may be able to gain some real traction.

Anyway, I found this heartwarming to read and important enough to share:

Source: Lockdown - a police constable's perspective (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/lockdown-police-constables-perspective)

__________________________________

The UK Column received the following letter from a serving police officer. His name must remain confidential, for, by speaking up for the law, and for the rights of the British people, he places his job in jeopardy. Such is the nature of our institutions today.

We reproduce this letter in full and thank the officer who had the courage and firmness to write it.



I am a serving police officer and I am writing this to give my perspective on what is happening to UK policing in the context of this so-called “Covid crisis”.

I have been a police officer for 14 years and have seen a lot of change in the service, even in that relatively short time. I have seen the gradual, but very deliberate drift towards political correctness, a concerted drive for diversity and equality at the expense of a robust, protective and impartial policing function, and the degradation and dismantling of the world-renowned policing model by the government, the mainstream press and a small minority of woke pressure groups.

Despite this, I think the public at large have maintained a healthy respect and gratitude for the difficult and vital job that we do in maintaining law and order as a “thin blue line”. However, I fear that the public trust in the UK police service is now circling the drain. In the structure of the force, the cracks that have been covered over in recent years are starting to show. The events of this year have exposed how political policing has become, and how entrenched the training and values of the last decade now are. This has manifested in the deteriorating behaviour and conduct of many officers and of the police service as a whole. I have watched in disbelief and dismay at the way in which some of my colleagues across the UK have resorted to extreme force and heavy-handed tactics against people who are simply exercising their basic human rights to freedom of speech, freedom to protest, freedom to work and gather with family and friends, freedom to worship, and freedom over their own bodies and health.

I understand that there was a pandemic of sorts at the beginning of the year, and there was an element of the unknown, for which some action had to be taken. I am mindful of the loss and grief of those who have lost someone due to this virus, but all the evidence I have seen says that there is no longer a risk to the general public and that the figures have been grossly inflated and misrepresented. Some of our more vulnerable and elderly people need to be protected, but no more so than any other year during flu season, and there is absolutely no justification for wholesale lockdown and arbitrary regulations to strangle the life out of the economy, which will inevitably lead to a “cure” that is immeasurably worse than the disease. The police service will end up dealing with fall-out from lockdowns for decades to come — mental health, suicides, increased crime of all types, drug and alcohol addictions, domestic abuse, public unrest and so on.

How an organisation that depends on thorough investigation and collation of evidence, and whose founding idea is the protection of the public, cannot see this is astounding. Senior officers and chief constables across the country are simply following the government diktats without question, or at least so it seems. Certainly, from my position within the police service, I have seen nothing to suggest that we are properly upholding the oath we all make, and carrying out the duty we have to uphold human rights with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, according equal respect to all.

This has been most obvious to me in the policing of different protests over the past six months. I have been directly involved in policing protests by Black Lives Matter, Extinction Rebellion and anti-lockdown groups, and the contrast between them has been stark and alarming. There is undoubtedly a lack of impartiality and fairness in the way that these different groups have been treated. I have seen first-hand the way in which police have facilitated and “taken the knee” to BLM protesters for fear of any appearance of institutional racism (which doesn’t exist, in my experience), and to the detriment of the safety of the public and officers on the ground. In a similar vein, Extinction Rebellion are given the freedom to protest, block roads, bring major city centres to a standstill, damage property and intimidate with their presence for weeks on end, without any robust and decisive police action. Contrast this with the anti-lockdown protesters, who are made up of a diverse cross-section of the general law-abiding public and are not “anti-vax conspiracy theorists”, as the mainstream press would have you believe. These protests have been met with almost immediate and disproportionate aggression and violence from the police. It is what is now commonly being referred to as “two–tier policing”, which I’m sorry to say is fairly accurate and not something I ever thought I’d see.

From working within the organisation, I can see how Covid enforcement is absorbing a disproportionate amount of time and resources. High-level meetings are held, strategies and policies are devised and filtered down the ranks, all at the expense of dealing with the usual workload of crime and the other vast responsibilities that the police service has. This is all done in the name of “public health and protection”, which in turn is based on misleading or fraudulent statistics and one-sided propaganda, pushed by the government through the mainstream media. Officers on the front line are confused by the constantly changing guidelines and legislation, and even they don’t know what they are supposed to be enforcing from day to day. Most rely on briefing documents for their direction and guidance, rather than studying the legislation for themselves.

Ironically, where I work is the only place I feel as though life is normal, because despite the plethora of posters, emails and reminders about being “covid secure” in the police station, most officers take no notice when out of the public eye. It is very interesting that not one police officer has died from Covid-19 across the whole of the UK (to the best of my knowledge), despite the fact that we have worked in a very public facing role since this “pandemic” began and with very limited PPE for the first few weeks.

I also find the over-policing of Covid regulations utterly astonishing. For many years I have worked on different teams across various departments that have been stretched to breaking point due to lack of resources, carrying huge workloads, working enforced overtime, and below minimum staffing. I have dealt with violent offenders and all manner of challenging and complex incidents on my own, managed crime scenes and serious road traffic collisions with a couple of other colleagues, and put my life and health on the line to protect the public. Now, and seemingly from nowhere, it is amazing how hundreds of officers are suddenly available to attend peaceful protests, vanloads can turn up to close gyms, shops and churches, and extra patrols be implemented to ensure Covid compliance. I actually find it insulting to the thousands of officers who turn up to work every day to do a difficult job and for genuine policing purposes.

I have always been proud of wearing the uniform and holding the office of constable, but much of what I have seen in the past few months has made me ashamed of the police service. A police officer has a unique and privileged position in society, with incredible power to intervene in the life of a member of the public, to both preserve and remove freedom. With this power comes great responsibility, and every officer must be held to account for their actions, but I fear that a constable’s autonomy, independence and discretion has been eroded beyond recognition. It is almost becoming a case of “I’m just following orders”, which didn’t stand as a defence in the Nuremberg trails and isn’t an acceptable justification for action or inaction by a British police officer.

I have worked with the most exceptional people in my service, many of whom are close and lifelong friends, and I know they didn’t join up to enforce draconian laws against law-abiding people. We all joined up to make a small difference, to keep people safe and maintain the peace and freedom that we enjoy in this country. What dismays me is the way in which many of these incredible people are unquestioningly following the orders and instructions from higher ranks, without investigating or understanding what the real motivation and agenda is behind all of this.

I think there are a few elements that combine to prevent officers asking questions or challenging these changes. Being a disciplined and ranked service, there is a reluctance to disobey orders or raise objections, officers have a secure income and pension which they don’t want to jeopardise, and there is also a prevailing cynical culture of “us versus them” in regards to the public, which is fostered over years of dealing with desperate situations and difficult people. There is always a rapid pace of change and re-inventing of the wheel in policing, and I think many officers get fatigued at new initiatives, schemes and law-changes. It’s far easier to do what you’re told than to fight against the system and stick your head above the parapet.

This all leads me to question of whether or not I want to remain part of a police service that is increasingly becoming an enforcement arm of the state, rather than an independent establishment that is accountable to the public and charged with upholding their safety and security. The police service should keep the government in check and prevent oppression, tyranny and political overreach into the lives of its citizens. The office of constable should be one that upholds laws that safeguard against arbitrary governance and legislation that infringes on the freedom that previous generations fought and died to secure for us.

I can foresee see a time, in the not-too-distant future, where I will have to make a stand and refuse to follow orders because they conflict with my principles, my Christian faith, my belief in the sanctity of human life, and the oath I swore when I joined the police. So far, I have managed to avoid directly enforcing any of these totalitarian measures, but I cannot and will not be acting upon or enforcing any of the legislation under the Coronavirus Act 2020, even if it costs my job.

For the time being, I will do my best to resist the rapid and destructive changes to “The Job” that I felt called to do to make the world a safer and more peaceful place and to serve the public without fear or favour. I do not know how long this resistance can last.

[Patient]

I hope that this gets good circulation and a lot of people read this. I feel bad for police in general as I am not aware of any country that is paying them enough money for the job that they are suppose to do.

The internal conflict that many of them are dealing with these days must be very difficult.

[Brigantia]

In order to beat the virus and save the NHS the plan is to limit people to one leaving the house a week and the bubble to cease to exist -- no home visits and no meeting friends outside, Thats not law yet but it is planned
Supermarkets to ban admittance to non mask wearers without a medical certificate.
Anyone who thinks this is about saving peoples lives need their heads looked
And on it goes.
Chris


Well, that's going to go down a treat... I've seen petite and slender ladies controlling the queue at my local supermarket, I don't fancy their chances with a belligerent hulk of a brute. That would mean that there would need to be a security guard permanently at the door, taking them away from any incidents inside and deterring shoplifters.

I think that all the supermarket companies and their workers' unions will not be happy at all about this. The government wanted the supermarkets to police people not wearing masks months ago, but quickly had to backtrack.

[ExomatrixTV]

CONFIRMED: Britain Will Issue VACCINE PASSPORTS all predicted in Rockefeller Foundation Lockstep & Track & Trace - Bill Gates Event 201 etc. etc.

“We’re talking about a piece of remarkable technology that can be brought to bear and can be readily integrated with the NHS”

https://cdn.summit.news/2021/01/GettyImages-1294853524.jpg

Despite previous government denials that there are any plans to roll out COVID vaccine passports, reports have confirmed that every person vaccinated in two select areas of Britain will be offered exactly that as a ‘trial’ being rolled out with immediate effect.

The London Telegraph reports (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2021/01/12/exclusive-vaccine-passports-trialled-thousands-britons/) that biometrics firm iProov and cybersecurity firm Mvine have developed the vaccine passports, which will be optionally provided as an app on phones of those vaccinated.

The government will conduct the rollout in two local authorities, and monitor its application until March.

The report notes that the government has ploughed £75,000 into the trial already, which is claimed to be a way of monitoring who has had the vaccine.

Frank Joshi, director and founder of Mvine noted that while the project started as just a way of keeping a record of COVID tests, extra funding was pumped into it in order to turn it into a vaccine passport scheme.

“Originally we started off with this need to prove whether you’ve had an antibody test, but it can be equally used to demonstrate whether you’ve been vaccinated,” Joshi said, according to the report.

Andrew Bud, chief executive of the other company involved, iProov, said that the system will be integrated with the National Health Service, and could easily be rolled out to everyone in the country.

“We’re talking about a piece of remarkable technology that can be brought to bear and can be readily integrated with the NHS,” he said.

The development appears to be separate from the government contracts given to two other firms (https://summit.news/2020/12/22/british-government-contracts-firms-to-make-covid-freedom-passports/) to develop COIVD ‘freedom passports’, which we reported on several weeks ago.

Last month, Britain’s vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi announced that the government had no plans to introduce immunity passports (https://summit.news/2020/12/15/uk-vaccine-minister-u-turn-absolutely-no-plans-for-covid-passports/) en mass, or place restrictions on those who do not take the jab.

This latest revelation puts Zahawi’s already dubious claim into serious doubt.
We also previously reported (https://summit.news/2020/11/18/uk-developing-qr-code-system-to-only-allow-vaccinated-people-into-events/), back in November, on the UK government’s active plans to develop a QR code system to use as an ‘immunity passport’.

The report, stemming from sources close to the government (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/11/17/people-have-covid-vaccine-could-get-qr-codes-allowing-access/), noted that “Those who refuse to get the Covid-19 jab would likely be refused entry to venues, as part of the same proposals.”

Other reports have suggested (https://summit.news/2020/12/10/report-app-will-implement-vaccination-status-allow-bars-restaurants-to-identify-the-unvaccinated/) that an app already used prominently in the UK by people to book doctor and hospital appointments could implement a vaccination status section that will show whether a person has taken the coronavirus jab or not, and that businesses may use it to refuse entry to those who have not.

The spectre of so called ‘immunity passports’ is looming globally.

Yesterday it was revealed that Denmark is the latest country (https://summit.news/2021/01/11/denmark-introducing-covid-vaccine-passport/) to announce that it is rolling out a ‘Covid passport’, to allow those who have taken the vaccine to engage in society without any restrictions.

Recently, the government in Ontario, Canada admitted (https://summit.news/2020/12/09/canadian-health-ministry-exploring-immunity-passports-vaccine-tracking-and-surveillance/) that it is exploring ‘immunity passports’ in conjunction with restrictions on travel and access to social venues for the unvaccinated.

Last month, Israel announced (https://summit.news/2020/12/14/vaccinated-israelis-to-get-green-passport-allowing-them-to-attend-events-eat-at-restaurants/) that citizens who get the COVID-19 vaccine will be given ‘green passports’ that will enable them to attend venues and eat at restaurants.
A litany (https://summit.news/2020/12/03/americans-to-get-vaccination-card-to-prove-theyve-taken-the-covid-shot/) of other (https://summit.news/2020/12/09/canadian-health-ministry-exploring-immunity-passports-vaccine-tracking-and-surveillance/) government (https://summit.news/2020/11/30/vaccine-minister-says-bars-restaurants-cinemas-will-demand-proof-of-vaccination-before-entry/)and travel industry figures (https://summit.news/2020/12/07/another-airline-announces-that-covid-passports-will-be-essential-for-travel/) in both the US, Britain and beyond (https://summit.news/2020/12/09/video-another-travel-company-exec-says-vaccine-passports-are-coming/) have suggested that ‘COVID passports’ (https://summit.news/2020/12/24/airline-officially-launches-covid-passport-ahead-of-global-deployment/) are coming in order for ‘life to get back to normal’. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-vaccine-passports-could-help-life-return-to-normal-but-experts-urge-caution-11607425135)

Sam Grant, campaign manager at the civili liberties advocacy group Liberty has warned that “any form of immunity passport risks creating a two-tier system in which some of us have access to freedoms and support while others are shut out.”

“These systems could result in people who don’t have immunity potentially being blocked from essential public services, work or housing – with the most marginalised among us hardest hit,” Grant further warned.

“This has wider implications too because any form of immunity passport could pave the way for a full ID system – an idea which has repeatedly been rejected as incompatible with building a rights-respecting society,” Grant further urged.


source (https://summit.news/2021/01/12/confirmed-britain-will-issue-vaccine-passports/)



--o-O-o--



So when you combine:

01. Rockefeller PDF Document "Operation Lockstep" (https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Annual-Report-2010-1.pdf) 2010
02. Rockefeller Foundation PDF (http://tinyurl.com/Rockefeller-Foundation-PDF2020) "Track & Trace" ID2020
03. World Economic Forum #Agenda2030 (https://www.weforum.org/strategic-intelligence)
04. Bill Gates (http://tinyurl.com/BillGatesTyranny) and his "Event 201 (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/)" exercise in Fall 2019
05. "The Great Reset (http://tinyurl.com/TheGreatReset)"
06. Club of Rome "Planetary Emergency Plan (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111849-Club-of-Rome-PLANETARY-EMERGENCY-PLAN)"
07. "Global Governance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_governance)" run by unelected (psychopathic) Technocrats (http://Technocracy.News) using advanced A.I. Algorithms!
08. 5G - Mass A.I. Surveillance Smart Grid (http://tinyurl.com/Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible) (The Big Elephant in The Room!).
09. Supreme Court Defeats George Soros and his Overseas Groups (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111496-Supreme-Court-Defeats-George-Soros-and-his-Overseas-Groups)
10. Spars-Pandemic-Scenario-2025-2028.pdf (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf) (20,3 Mb)

All in plain sight ... meanwhile almost all Mainstream Media refuses to ask the hard questions!

cheers,
John Kuhles aka ExomatrixTV

[onawah]

RFK Jr. to NPR’s Terry Gross: ‘I Urge You to Correct the Record’
01/12/21
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/npr-terry-gross-fresh-air-covid-vaccines/

"On Nov. 24, Terry Gross, host of NPR’s “Fresh Air,” interviewed Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine. He is also the co-director of the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine Development.

During the interview, Hotez made a number of inaccurate statements about Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense chairman and chief legal counsel.

Here is Kennedy’s letter to Gross, asking that she correct those statements and others relating to vaccine science, and also requesting the opportunity to debate Hotez on a future segment of “Fresh Air”:

Dear Terry,

During your November 24 interview, Dr. Peter Hotez made several inaccurate and damaging statements about me that went unchallenged. I know you value accuracy and integrity, and so I urge you to correct the record.

Dr. Hotez falsely claimed that I spoke to Nazis and QAnon in Germany

Dr. Hotez was apparently referring to my August 29 speech at the Rally for Peace and Freedom in Berlin organized by the German group, Querdenken 711, or “Critical Thinking 711.” Querdenken is neither Nazi nor QAnon.

Querdenken is a broad-based, peaceful citizens’ movement launched by a large group of European human and civil rights lawyers and others to promote freedom, peace, democracy,and human rights. It strongly opposes Nazism, anti-Semitism, and all forces of extremism. There was no evidence of Nazi iconography anywhere near the Querdenken protest. (Dr. Hotez apparently conflated the large Querdenken rally-reliably estimated crowds = 100k to 1 million plus-with a tiny, staged demonstration by about 50 Nazis and QAnon supporters that occurred simultaneously across town at the Reichstag).

My speech was a screed against Nazism. The principal stage ornament was a giant mural of Mahatma Gandhi, the antithesis of a Nazi hero. Among the speakers were doctors, lawyers, clergy of every persuasion, soldiers, police officers, parents, children, world-famous athletes, politicians from Germany’s Green Party, human rights activists, and leaders of prominent nonprofit peace, human rights, and democracy advocacy organizations. The speakers and audience were racially, ethnically, and religiously diverse and represented dozens of nationalities. The event’s Master of Ceremonies was a Black African born in Ghana. The musical performance included an Indian Hare Krishna monk. The banners were rainbows, peace signs, BLM insignias and the flags of every nation in Europe. There were no swastikas nor QAnon iconography. As is its usual practice, Querdenken took great pains to exclude extremists from the Berlin event. Those efforts were spectacularly successful. The complete absence of extremist influence is evident from the program, from all the footage publicly available on the Children’s Health Defense website, on my social media, and in the thousands of photos and videos of the event easily viewed on various platforms of the Internet. Any reporter interested in accuracy may easily check these sources.

I am currently in litigation against Dr. Hotez’s probable source on this slander — an anonymous author who calls himself “Down East Democrat,” who first vouchsafed that libel in an opinion piece on the Internet platform Daily Kos. The fact that he can point to a source does not excuse Dr. Hotez from independently verifying the slander before reporting an implausible accusation that is one of the most damaging charges that anyone can levy at a public figure. It does not relieve NPR of correcting the error when discovered.

I have notified Dr. Hotez that I will sue him if he repeats that libel. He denies that he even made that statement, but the Fresh Air transcript speaks for itself. I ask you to take steps to address the harms that Dr. Hotez caused while on your show.

Dr. Hotez erroneously called me ‘anti-vaccine’

I am not anti-vaccine. I have said this hundreds of times over the years. I have explained, ad nauseam, that my demand for safer vaccines, robust science and regulatory agencies — free from Big Pharma’s corrupting conflicts — does not make me anti-vaccine. (I have fought for four decades to remove mercury from fish, yet nobody calls me “anti-fish”). Characterizing all questions about vaccine safety and efficacy as “anti-vaccine” is a calculated industry propaganda technique for muzzling debate, and for marginalizing and vilifying critics. It is Dr. Hotez’s strategy to apply the “anti-vaccine” ad hominem to anyone who questions the medical cartel’s orthodoxy that all vaccines are safe, effective and thoroughly tested. Dr. Hotez applies the defamation broadly: to discredit attorneys like me who sue his industry, to intimidate the many doctors, scientists and public health educators who ask reasonable and thoughtful questions about vaccine safety protocols; and to bully, silence and gaslight the mothers of millions of intellectually damaged children who believe that vaccines harmed their children.

Dr. Hotez erroneously called me ‘anti-mask’

I am not anti-mask. Neither I, nor my organization, Children’s Health Defense (CHD), take a position on masks. I have asked legitimate and thoughtful questions about the science that justifies government mask mandates. I have also complained about the absence of notice and common rulemaking and due process accompanying the imposition of mask mandates. This advocacy means that I believe in science, democracy and our Constitution. This does not make me anti-mask.

On CHD’s website, we publish every peer-reviewed study we can find on mask efficacy, regardless of their conclusions. We have identified over 35 placebo-controlled, peer-reviewed studies to date. We have not been able to find any peer-reviewed, placebo-controlled study that supports the efficacy of masks against viral or bacteriological transmission — even in hospital settings. Meanwhile, dozens of studies suggest negative efficacy and several link masks to a grim inventory of respiratory, pulmonary, dental, gastrointestinal and dermatological injuries.

I am always careful to say that the one-sided findings refuting mask efficacy in the existing peer-reviewed literature do not mean that masks are ineffective against COVID-19 transmission. Most of the published research focuses on influenza transmission. Researchers have yet to comprehensively study the specific efficacy of masks against COVID-19. Future research may yet demonstrate a beneficial association. However, the popular claim that “science supports masking” — an assertion Dr. Hotez routinely broadcasts — is simply inaccurate.

On your show, Dr. Hotez cited a study by IHME (Institute for Health and Metrics Evaluation) that predicts a large number of lives would be saved from universal masking. However, the IHME paper is not a placebo-controlled trial. It is, rather, a modeling study and, like all modeling studies, its predictive weight wholly depends on the quality of the assumptions upon which it relies. Here, the refereed literature does not support the study’s fundamental assumption — that masks reduce viral transmission. “Garbage in,” the saw goes, “garbage out!”

It is worth mentioning that Bill Gates is the principal funder of IHME, and that IHME was largely responsible for the notoriously exaggerated mortality calculations that overestimated COVID deaths by 20-fold at the COVID pandemic’s outset. Political leaders around the globe cited the IHME’s results to justify the universal lockdowns. Mr. Gates contributed $600 million to IHME and $79 million to the Imperial College of London which supported the scandalously inaccurate IHME findings by using the same defective modeling assumptions and techniques. Mr. Gates had been the media’s primary cheerleader for universal lockdowns and a vocal advocate for censoring dissenters who criticize those policies. For several years, his company, Bing, has actively censored information about health strategies that compete with the pharma paradigm, or any information that is critical of pharmaceutical industry products — including vitamins, chiropractors, nutrition, functional and integrative medicine, and especially vaccines. The lockdowns he helped orchestrate have increased Mr. Gates’ wealth by $20 billion.

Meanwhile, lockdowns have triggered global food and medicine shortages that are causing deaths of 10,000 African children each month, the obliteration of the American middle class, and the permanent closure of millions of small businesses — including nearly half of all Black-owned businesses. The shutdown has bankrupted our social safety net, left millions of people without health insurance, and pushed millions more into poverty and food insecurity, while the net wealth of America’s super-rich, including Mr. Gates, has grown to nearly $4 trillion. The quarantine has increased not only Mr. Gates’ wealth, but given him unprecedented power to dictate far-reaching policies that affect all of humanity while, coincidentally, swelling his pocketbook.

I remind you that the traditional role of the media — and of Fresh Air — was to exercise extreme suspicion and skepticism towards such large agglomerations of power.

Terry, I’d love your advice on what I might do to correct Dr. Hotez’s slanders. I would, of course, welcome the opportunity to appear on-air myself to correct his defamatory comments. An appearance would also allow me to address the many other inaccurate, misleading and self-serving assertions that Dr. Hotez made on your show. I would be happy if you invited Dr. Hotez back to join me for a civil discussion about the critical national and global issues that he addressed on Fresh Air. I realize this is a pipe dream. As you know, I have appeared on Fresh Air over the years, but I am aware that NPR has joined the mainstream media in blackballing any knowledgeable expert who questions the government/pharma vaccine orthodoxies promoted by Mr. Gates. My litigation against the vaccine companies and my books criticizing the industry and regulatory corruption have made me part of that disqualified cohort.

I suspect that Peter Hotez is relieved by this blanket ban on debate and dissent. Dr. Hotez has become comfortable with the softball questioning by credulous and fawning hosts of cable and network news shows addicted to pharma advertising and/or Bill Gates’ “philanthropy.” Some of us still expect more from NPR.

For more than a year beginning in 2017, Dr. Hotez and I privately maintained a regular telephone debate about vaccine safety moderated by my cousin, Special Olympics Director Tim Shriver. It is my memory that Peter did not fare well in those exchanges. I continue to publish scrupulously sourced science-based castigations of Peter’s serial self-serving inaccuracies that he routinely broadcasts from his Twitter feed. I have frequently challenged him to debate publicly about those whoppers. I am not surprised that he has steadfastly refused my invitations. On March 11, 2019, Dr. Hotez told Joe Rogan that he would hesitate to debate me because I am a “clever lawyer.” In an earlier conversation, he told me that he would happily participate in a public debate, but only if NIH (presumably Dr. Fauci) gave him permission. That peculiar demurrer raises its own parade of questions about the cozy relationship between government and industry that, I hope, you also find troubling.

In fact, NPR’s choice to allow Dr. Hotez on Fresh Air to unleash diatribes of unchecked and unchallenged pharmaceutical industry propaganda raises many disturbing questions about the current role of public broadcasting in the age of pandemic censorship.

If Peter Hotez were an oil industry insider, it is difficult to fathom that NPR would allow him to transform Fresh Air into a petroleum industry advertising vehicle, or to issue unchallenged slanders against a leading climate activist, such as branding him “anti-science” and “anti-prosperity.”

I can only imagine that such circumstances would offend your sense of fairness, but I’m hard-pressed to distinguish this example from your interview with Dr. Hotez. Peter is the consummate insider to the $100 billion vaccine industry. Although he portrays himself to your listeners as free from profit motives, Dr. Hotez has elsewhere boasted that he hopes to make millions on his tropical hookworm vaccine. Likewise, he stands to cash in on his other tropical medicine projects.

Dr. Hotez’s myriad financial entanglements with Bill Gates only exacerbate the conflicts inherent in his various Pharma pedigrees.

As you surely must know, Mr. Gates is also Dr. Hotez’s mentor and principal funder. Mr. Gates reportedly donated $52,000,000 to develop and conduct clinical trials in Brazil for his hookworm vaccine. After that donation, Dr. Hotez emerged as the principal voice for promoting vaccines globally and as a carnival barker for Everything Gates. In that sense, Dr. Hotez has become the most visible promoter of the government/Pharma partnership and the rich government subsidies and mandates that underpin the global vaccine industry.

It is not surprising that Dr. Hotez is also a self-interested promoter of censorship against people like me who question those policies and regularly call out his dishonest pronouncements.

NPR’s own controversial relationship with Bill Gates compounds the awkward appearance of self-dealing and bias when Fresh Air gives Hotez full license to defame critics of Gates and his pharma partners. Gates has donated $9.3 million to NPR since 2013. Mr. Gates is the world’s largest vaccine maker, the world’s largest distributor and most aggressive promoter of vaccines. As New York Magazine has documented, Gates’ significant personal and foundation investments in the major vaccine companies benefit from his philanthropic promotion of the vaccines globally. His investments in GAVI, PATH, and WHO have given this powerful, unelected billionaire unprecedented control to dictate our global health policies, control our freedom of movement and even our clothing. His funding of dozens of industry front groups, social media outlets, television networks, newspapers, magazines, and his ubiquitous and sinister “fact checker” organization, has allowed him to control public perceptions, and censor public debate over his policies.

In 2009, in an unprecedented appearance by a billionaire with no government portfolio or official approval before the United Nations, Gates unilaterally declared the 2010’s to be the “Decade of Vaccines.” His $10 billion donation effectively gave him control over the WHO. Under his direction, right on schedule, WHO declared in January 2019 that questioning of vaccines was among the greatest threats to global health. That announcement opened the Pharma allies in virtually every U.S. state and in 100 nations around the globe. A tsunami of suffocating censorship — directed by Mr. Gates and around the world — accompanied this legislative campaign. Under this stifling new rubric, nobody can question the lopsided public investment of $48 billion COVID vaccines with meager proof of safety and efficacy — to which governments and the medical cartel and Big Pharma are inexplicably directing us. Meanwhile, regulatory officials and Pharma ignore or suppress a pharmacopeia of cheap, available, safe, off-patent therapeutic remedies like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Pepcid, and cortical steroids that appear to be much more thoroughly tested and far more effective against COVID — but far less profitable for Gates and his Pharma partners. It would be interesting to hear an informed and vigorous debate on the peer-reviewed science supporting these various remedies. But such discussions depart from the orthodoxy and are therefore taboo.

Censorship

As your show’s title implies, you built “Fresh Air” on a platform of fierce protection of first-amendment free speech, open dialogue and debate. I imagine that the current Kafkaesque imposition of censorship against even mild critiques of the government’s diktats must inspire in you a visceral revulsion. Working with the industry’s captive regulators, pharma insiders like Mr. Gates and Dr. Hotez have succeeded in making it verboten to ask even the most reasonable questions about a pharmaceutical product mandated by government, immunized from liability, heavily subsidized, freed from animal studies, placebo control human trials, and the long-duration safety trials that are required for every other medical product. Dr. Hotez and Mr. Gates are the spear tip of Big Pharma’s push to abolish informed consent and force every global citizen to undergo risky medical interventions. Their most momentous accomplishment has been abolishing the public right to question such violence or to complain or debate Pharma policies or pronouncements.

Since 2019, we have weathered an extraordinary devolution in press independence as acquiescence and fearmongering have eclipsed the Fourth Estate’s proud traditions of healthy scrutiny toward government pronouncements, and robust skepticism toward the corrupt pharmaceutical industry. Scientific literacy in the media has given way to “appeals to authority”;instead of citing peer-reviewed science, journalists content themselves with defending controversial government health policies by citing regulators like NIH, CDC, WHO and FDA — all of these agencies with well-documented records of corruption and capture.The media has effectively deified Dr. Anthony Fauci, and altogether displaced the robust scrutiny of government, pharmaceuticals, and science that were once the hallmarks of the American independent press. It has become mandatory for journalists to insist that all vaccines are safe and effective simply because the government says so.

You have long been a champion of the idea that censorship is the weapon of tyrants. You understand that America’s founders adopted the First Amendment not to protect popular speech approved by government and industry power centers, but to protect unpopular speech — especially during times of crisis. Democracy functions best when public policy emerges from the cauldron of open, and even fierce, debate. Turning “Fresh Air” over to pharmaceutical industry insiders to promote shoddily tested mandatory medical products and broadcast unchallenged industry propaganda is not consistent with your show’s proud tradition."

[ExomatrixTV]

Mass Media PlanDemic #PsyWars explained by the Elite in 2019:


https://vimeo.com/320913130
Lecture by Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, at the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference on 22 January 2019


Lots of laughter ... but not so "funny" for us!

They literary LAUGH AT US ALL thinking it is so so funny.


I will seek a written transcript of the whole presentation ... if I find it I will add it to this video!

John


http://whynotnews.eu/pix/wow.png (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZMr7AEL0jQ)


Screen-snapshots are from: tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us (http://tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us) in 2019!

http://whynotnews.eu/pix/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us.png


Screen-snapshots are from: tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us (http://tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us) in 2019!



http://whynotnews.eu/pix/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us2.png


Screen-snapshots are from: tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us (http://tinyurl.com/PlanDemicTeam-Laughing-At-Us) in 2019!



On the same day: ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference on 22 January 2019:


"Non-medical interventions" discussed in 2019:



https://vimeo.com/320910700


🌐 tinyurl.com/TheGreatReset (http://tinyurl.com/TheGreatReset)
🌐 tinyurl.com/The-Covid-Cult (http://tinyurl.com/The-Covid-Cult)
🌐 tinyurl.com/War-on-Independent-Media (http://tinyurl.com/War-on-Independent-Media)

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 13th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWSwDCBJWkk

[avid]

UK Column News - 13th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWSwDCBJWkk

Great unbiased news, well worth watching with all background links. UK Column is a beacon of hope. They point out the obvious mind-control rubbish oozing from the BBC, and their ‘‘education programmes’ for children in lockdown, it’s downright horrendous, biased and very little educational value. Brainwashing by the BBC is paramount so switch them off 😡😡

[greybeard]

UK Column News Special - Eric Levy


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyK49-_Ncbs

[ExomatrixTV]

Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony Nov 20, 2019

2cQD5T0M0Eo


source (https://commission.itnj.org/2019/11/18/dr-robert-o-young-testimony-on-natural-treatments-for-health/)

This statement by Dr. Robert O. Young provides a brief history of how and why the State Department put him out of business and into jail, and addresses the responsiveness to his natural treatments for health, including successful treatments to cure cancer.

Watch all the Indonesia testimonies https://commission.itnj.org

Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony Nov 20, 2019 (Full Original Version):
gKjnEz5s37o

quote: "I must set the record straight here folks. Dr. Robert O. Young was presenting a testimony at this tribunal about the dangers of a whole lot of vaccines for many diseases, etc. Then he made mention to some words that Bill Gates said about his depopulation agenda. It's not Dr. Young who was saying Africans are worthless and deplorable who are not a part of the global economy. Please watch the clip to the end. He says in the words of Bill Gates. By the way this is just an excerpt of the long testimony. I hope this clarifies things. I have seen a lot of hate words toward Dr. Young". unquote.

DISCLAIMER: Everything you hear is NOT "flawless" so called "fact-checkers sites" will always find SOMETHING to "throw the baby out with the bathwater" as we can do the same with them (the 'fact' checkers) when they do it it is "okay' when we do it is "wrong" ... Hypocrites everywhere.

cheers,
John

[greybeard]

Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony Nov 20, 2019

2cQD5T0M0Eo


source (https://commission.itnj.org/2019/11/18/dr-robert-o-young-testimony-on-natural-treatments-for-health/)

This statement by Dr. Robert O. Young provides a brief history of how and why the State Department put him out of business and into jail, and addresses the responsiveness to his natural treatments for health, including successful treatments to cure cancer.

Watch all the Indonesia testimonies https://commission.itnj.org

Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony Nov 20, 2019 (Full Original Version):
gKjnEz5s37o

quote: "I must set the record straight here folks. Dr. Robert O. Young was presenting a testimony at this tribunal about the dangers of a whole lot of vaccines for many diseases, etc. Then he made mention to some words that Bill Gates said about his depopulation agenda. It's not Dr. Young who was saying Africans are worthless and deplorable who are not a part of the global economy. Please watch the clip to the end. He says in the words of Bill Gates. By the way this is just an excerpt of the long testimony. I hope this clarifies things. I have seen a lot of hate words toward Dr. Young". unquote.

DISCLAIMER: Everything you hear is NOT "flawless" so called "fact-checkers sites" will always find SOMETHING to "throw the baby out with the bathwater" as we can do the same with them (the 'fact' checkers) when they do it it is "okay' when we do it is "wrong" ... Hypocrites everywhere.

cheers,
John
Dr Robert Young was featured on a video here before he was convicted
Chris
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?67185-Cure-any-Autoimmune-Disease&p=781480&viewfull=1#post781480

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?67185-Cure-any-Autoimmune-Disease&p=781480&viewfull=1#post781480

[Anna70]

I just saw this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_hwJkhNo9w&feature=emb_logo) via Twitter, which addresses the fact that the Covid jab is not a vaccine by any definition, and as such not only is it being missold, but if classified properly, there would be liability consequences for the manufacturers. (Apologies if this has already been posted, or if this is not the right thread to post it in. If so, please feel free to move or remove my post as appropriate.)

[Ernie Nemeth]

Excellent point, Anna70! I had to be patient but around the 23 minute mark, or so, the distinction between vaccine and gene therapy is made clear. Gene therapy is not covered in the '86 liability exemption...that's why it's called a vaccine when, how could I have missed it!, it is in fact a gene therapy and not a vaccine.

[Patient]

They are increasing the amount of restrictions on the people of Ontario. Threats of fines or jail if you are not following the "Stay at Home Order".

There are a couple of videos attached to this page and one in particular that I am questioning and would appreciate some feedback. One main one at the bottom is a presentation of data to support the need for the lockdown. It is full of "projections" and "could become", etc. One table in particular which is titled "Weekly % positivity by Age Group" is puzzling - are babies being tested and found positive as having covid-19? I thought kids were not getting covid?

Also, according to one of the presentations they are saying that about 34% of the population are admitting to not following covid guidelines and restrictions - to me, I see this as a way to get people stressed out and blame their neighbour. They do not say how many people were used to collect this data - my assumption is that their surveyed group was very small, if any at all.

I would appreciate any feedback on this news report. (Obviously they have been manipulating the numbers, but to me this is so blatant it is insulting - am I wrong?)

https://globalnews.ca/news/7571036/ontario-new-restrictions-lockdown-coronavirus

Coronavirus: Ontario declares 2nd state of emergency, issues stay-at-home order
12 Jan, 2021
The Ontario government has declared a state of emergency — the second since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic — and is issuing a stay-at-home order.

Premier Doug Ford said the state of emergency will be in effect for at least 28 days.
“The system is on the brink of collapse,” Ford said.
“It’s on the brink of being overwhelmed. We’re at levels we’ve never seen before."
The stay-at-home order will take effect on Thursday at 12:01 a.m.

“Under this order, everyone must stay home and only go out for essential trips to pick up groceries, or go to medical appointments,” Ford said, adding that walking pets or exercising is still permitted.

All businesses that have the ability to allow employees to work from home must do so, officials said.“Under the declaration of a provincial emergency, the province will provide authority to all enforcement and provincial offences officers, including the Ontario Provincial Police, local police forces, bylaw officers, and provincial workplace inspectors to issue tickets to individuals who do not comply with the stay-at-home-order,” officials said in a government news release Tuesday.

Ford said enforcement and inspection will be increased and an inspection blitz at big-box stores will begin in the coming days.

[Anna70]

Thank you ever so much for noting the time this point is being made in the video; I should have thought of doing that when I posted it! :-)

[Icare]

Article from VaccineDeaths.com:


Who’s murdering all the COVID scientists?

12/27/2020 / By Ethan Huff




Doctors, scientists and other medical experts involved with research into the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) are mysteriously turning up dead all around the world in what appears to be a mass culling of people who know too much truth about the plandemic.

One of the latest deaths was that of Alexander “Sasha” Kagansky, a Russian scientist who had been working on developing a COVID-19 vaccine when he was brutally stabbed and thrown from the window of his 14th floor apartment in St. Petersburg.

Reports indicate that Kagansky died “under strange circumstances,” an understatement considering the nature and timing of his demise.

Kagansky had recently been awarded a grant by the Russian government to investigate new ways of diagnosing and treating brain tumors. He was also a vocal advocate for natural remedies like herbs and mushrooms that are known to help kill cancer cells.

Another who died this year under similar circumstances was Frank Plummer, a world-renowned Canadian scientist who had also been working on a COVID-19 vaccine when he was apparently taken out by dark entities.

Back in January, we reported on Plummer’s connections to a communist Chinese spy ring that appears to have been responsible for stealing coronavirus strains from a Canadian lab and taking them to Wuhan.

Professor Bing Liu from the University of Pittsburgh is another relevant scientist who was murdered this year, in this case right before he could go public with a new breakthrough concerning the nature of COVID-19.

“Bing was on the verge of making very significant findings toward understanding the cellular mechanisms that underlie SARS-CoV-2 infection and the cellular basis of the following complications,” reads a statement from his colleagues within the Department of Computational and Systems Biology.

Then we have Gita Ramjee, an HIV scientist who supposedly died from COVID-19 while visiting London to deliver a lecture about HIV treatment and prevention. Upon returning to Durban, she reportedly felt unwell and went to the hospital, where she died not long thereafter.

A World Health Organization (WHO) driver named Pyae Sone Win Maung also died back in May while transporting coronavirus samples for the United Nations. He had been driving a well-marked U.N. vehicle at the time when shots were fired, killing him and injuring another passenger.

Vaccine whistleblower Brandy Vaughan, a former sales executive from Merck & Co. and founder of LearnTheRisk.org, was also found dead in her home earlier this month beside her nine-year-old son. Vaughan had been working hard to educate the public about vaccine safety risks.
Peter Daszak and Ron Fouchier need to be fully investigated

On the flip side, the following people are researchers of interest who are suspected of propagating plandemic fearmongering and fraud, and who could be linked to the aforementioned deaths in some way:

• Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, is responsible for orchestrating the myth that COVID-19 was a natural phenomenon. Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know reveal that employees of EcoHealth ring-led an operation to have 27 prominent health scientists condemn “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

EcoHealth, by the way, is the same “non-profit” organization that received millions of dollars in U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

• Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier is responsible for creating the world’s deadliest virus strain. His bioweapons experiments are widely condemned and could be responsible for the unleashing of COVID-19.

Fouchier is also responsible for isolating the SARS coronavirus that was smuggled out of Saudi Arabia and sent to Frank Plummer, who as previously mentioned turned up dead just a week after Great Game India published a report on the scandal.

More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) as it breaks can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:

HumansAreFree.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

GreatGameIndia.com



https://vaccinedeaths.com/2020-12-27-whos-murdering-all-the-covid-scientists.html

[Icare]

I'm surprised this video from Fox News has not neen taken down yet, even though Dr Bhakdi was cut off in the end, but too late to stop him from warning people of the danger of the vaccine.

Dr Bhakdi is a German epidemiologist (originally from Thailand) who taught other doctors for years and had a spotless reputation. He has now completely been blacklisted in the German media and on Youtube.

The British channel "Triggernometry" had a really good interview with him with a large number of views. That video was then deleted by youtube.

Here on Fox News he is just being given a few minutes, but he still manages to bring his message across.

RZDr3CsfolA

[greybeard]

Newsletter 355, 06.01.2020: Money Talks VI and the worldwide lawsuits

(this is an ad-hoc translation by Paul Charles Gregory BDÜ of the original German text by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich)

Table of Contents:

Status of the PCR lawsuit at the Regional Court of Berlin

Lawsuit on PCR test submitted in New York

Portugal and Ecuador show Germany who the real banana republic is

Canada submits first class action suit for compensation which will be an international class action

Further points: Lawsuit against the EU Commission for its approval of the vaccine to be declared null & void; constitutional complaint lodged against the measures by a German judge

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Despite everything, or indeed in view of everything, let us first wish you all a cheerful New Year for 2021. Before we inform you about the state of play of the Corona lawsuits, and in particular the class actions, here is a reminder of the background against which all this is happening:

The hearings conducted by the Berlin Corona Committee since July 10, 2020, and attended by some one hundred internationally prominent scientists, medics, economists, lawyers and people badly affected, have determined – as of today – that at no point was the Corona scandal about health. This is because:

As explained in the last newsletter, the danger presented by this allegedly new virus can be compared to that of influenza – this is the conclusion not only of studies by Prof. John Ioannidis of Stanford University but also the assessment of the World Health Organisation.

The Drosten-PCR-Tests, which were devised in January 2020, are not remotely suitable for determining whether someone is infected or not, despite being recommended as the global Gold Standard for determining infection by the WHO; it should be noted that the leadership of this organisation is under the financial control of China and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the WHO certainly has good employees – as too does the Robert-Koch Institute, despite its incompetent management).

In a retraction paper, a score of highly regarded international scientists have called on the editors of the journal which published the PCR tests as a measurement method for infections to withdraw the mischief forthwith. This test is not only scientific nonsense, but was obviously designed to create as many false positives as possible and so spread panic in the world. This English language retraction paper has been viewed about 18 million times:

www.cormandrostenreview.com

Furthermore, a second assertion made in January 2020 by Drosten that there are asymptomatic infections is false. These do not exist, as documented most recently by a major survey of ten million people from Wuhan of all places:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w

A person who has no symptoms is healthy. This means that no-one need be fearful of people without symptoms or force them to wear masks, and no-one must be frightened that a positive test means that the person who has tested positive is infected. Horror pictures of hospitals with beds in the corridors are again doing the rounds – such scenes occur every year during a completely normal influenza outbreak (we will be glad to make available a kaleidoscope with such pictures of recent years taken from the mainstream media): such pictures are used solely in order to spread panic. There is still no excess mortality in Germany – it is perfectly normal for more people to die in winter.

So what is really at issue, if there is no health problem different to the normal surge of influenza? Here, too, we have been able to form an impression from the hearings we have conducted and from more ancillary information.

As of today, it must be assumed that, in September 2019, the Davos clique, as we call them, was about to go up in smoke. This group of self-appointed corporate elites and top politicians has met annually for at least 20 years under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), which is a private organisation. What happened was that, in September 2019, there was a further financial crash, even bigger than that of the Lehman crisis 12 years ago. This was reported on only briefly (by, among others and very competently, the German weekly broadsheet Die Zeit), after which the reporting went silent again. The financial system was again on the brink of collapse because there was a menace of it becoming visible that, for at least 20 years, its sole purpose had been to plunder the taxpayers to the benefit of the Mafia-like operations. In other words: to shift the assets of the broad mass of citizens to business concerns. The best example of this are the ‘Cum-ex deals’, which are still unpunished, with the help of which banks, concerns and the super-rich were reimbursed twice or three times for taxes that they had paid just once. It is understandable that it might be possible to have reimbursed a tax payment of € 10 million. But not that instead, 20 or 30 million can be demanded back – this is something that everyone will find obvious, with or without a degree in law. This way the above-mentioned insiders obtained over many years a total of € 38 billion by defrauding the taxpayers. This was only possible because they were given cover by politicians – who over at least the last 20 years in particular have been made compliant by the relevant elites through the private WEF meetings. The fact that the courts in Germany failed to act shows that those mentioned are able, via the political scene, to influence what happens in the courts.

We had long seen that something was amiss during our lawsuits about bank liability in connection with finance for dilapidated buildings. For there, too, it emerged that Deutsche Bank in particular had a direct line to the courts and had made the judges into errand boys without a mind of their own. (Incidentally, the former head of Deutsche Bank, Josef Ackermann, not only met Merkel & Co regularly in Davos but celebrated his sixtieth birthday directly in the chancellory with Merkel.) This explains why German judges – blindly – adopted in their pronouncements the assertion of Deutsche Bank that it was normal for a bank to issue loans without a loan agreement in the hope that, sometime later, it would be possible to conclude a suitable loan contract; the thinking being that the issue of a loan at the request of a potential borrower leads to a loan contract being concluded, yet since, at this time, Deutsche Bank did not have the documents necessary for a valid contract, it was not possible for a court to determine that a contract had come about merely by the funds being made available – because if it had, the Deutsche Bank would have sunk like a stone – except that none of us had imagined that the Deutsche Bank was only one part of the Davos clique, albeit a most important member for purposes of money laundering, and that today we have to reckon with a thoroughly corrupt elite which will stop at nothing.

In his report “Pandemic Games”, Paul Schreyer has described very lucidly this entanglement of corporate “elites” and political “elites,” which has become ever deeper over the last 20 years. There he also illustrates how these elites have been attempting, in a targeted and practised manner, not only to retain illegitimate power but even to extend such power indefinitely with the aid of the most massive and cynical control mechanisms before the objects of these control mechanisms – which is us – can notice and rebel against it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSnJhHOU_28

In his lecture “Why do the lambs not speak up,” Professor Rainer Mausfeld explained in turn (incidentally, already at the beginning of 2019 and so entirely independently of the Corona story) how over many years politics has repeatedly manufactured fear and panic, without the general public realising what was happening, in order to get people to support political decisions which they would otherwise reject.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kLzmatet8w

The former US deputy minister of housing construction and investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts explains in her documentary film “Catherine Austin Fitts Full Interview Planet Lockdown” how these “elites” are currently implementing the takeover of the assets of the middle classes or are trying to (because if only 10% of the population notice this, the house of cards will collapse, some thinkers assume an even lower percentage). With the focus here on the USA, but certainly applicable to elsewhere, one of the ways in which this is happening is that, first of all, areas with small and medium-sized businesses, for example restaurants and retailers, are closed via Lockdown so that their owners can no longer make a living, and in particular that they can no longer pay back any loans they have taken out. Although aid packages are announced, these are disbursed only sparingly if at all. Thereafter – and this may apply specifically only to the USA – riots are organised in these areas, which lead to the additional destruction of these businesses so that they can no longer be sold even in a fire sale. Thereafter, investors with tax breaks and from the aforementioned Davos clique can acquire these businesses for next to nothing.

Link to interview with Catherine Austin Fitts
On the lawsuits

As you will know, a number of institutions and law firms have coordinated worldwide in order to have the courts ascertain the background illustrated above and in order afterwards to demand compensation from the ringleaders and concerns for the many who have been harmed by the Drosten-Test lockdown.

The lawsuits being pursued globally are not uncoordinated – they are largely the result of detailed joint planning by the scientists and lawyers involved. The two facts (i) that the Drosten-Test recommended globally by the WHO cannot detect infection, and (ii) that there are no asymptomatic infections (and therefore no real pandemic, at most a PCR casedemic) are of central importance for the outcome of the lawsuits. These facts will cause the house of cards of the pandemic fraudsters to collapse everywhere.

It also follows that whatever is established in the USA, Canada, Australia, Italy, France etc. in this context, (using the help of witnesses and experts, as well as expert opinions) can also be used as evidence in all other courts of the world.
I. Our PCR test complaint on behalf of Dr. Wodarg and the complaint against Drosten and subsequent complaints

The complaint is pending at the Regional Court of Berlin under the file number 27 O 436/20. On account of an “oversight” – which we consider very strange – the complaint was only delivered to the opposing party weeks after its submission. It was alleged that the court fees which we had remitted had erroneously been booked as payment for a final settlement of accounts and only when – after our phone call – this "oversight" was put right was the complaint formally delivered. We are now waiting for the opposing party to reply.

The complaint against Drosten is based on the Cease-and-Desist letter to Drosten:

http://bit.ly/3rcnWlB

(Original German version: http://bit.ly/3nrn62b )

The complaint will be completed in the coming days and then, it too, will be submitted to the Regional Court of Berlin. Together with a group of lawyers we are working on a number of further precedence case complaints, but above all (because this is faster and less expensive) also on many cease and desist letters against those in positions of responsibility. This way we obtain in effect something like a German class action. The cease and desist letters ensure that the visible puppets Drosten, Wieler, but also the members of The Leopoldina National Academy of Sciences and others including the individuals who, in their official capacities, bear personal responsibility for imposition of quarantine and similar measures – the cease and desist letters ensure that these people are put under pressure even if, thereafter, the necessary justification of the claims arising from the letters will need many months. In this time, a few of the precedence case lawsuits (which all concern the PCR tests and asymptomatic infections) will proceed by taking evidence (i.e. questioning of ordinary and expert witnesses and the drafting of expertises). Their results can then be used for rulings on the parallel “dormant” proceedings: the lawsuits dormant until this point of time will not be able to come to any other conclusion since the facts will have been established in the parallel precedence cases.
II. PCR test lawsuit in New York

On December 16, 2020, the US colleagues working with Robert F Kennedy, Jr´s Children’s Health Defense and advised by the same experts as ourselves, submitted a PCR test complaint in New York on behalf of a number of plaintiffs.

Translator’s note: Supplementary information describing the PCR test complaint will be issued shortly as an update to this translation.

III. The Canadian class action, which will develop to be an international class action for all those harmed by the Drosten-PCR-Test-Lockdowns

In the last week Canadian colleagues working with Michael Swinwood have submitted a class action. It is being added to, on the instructions of the court. The complainants initially represented are Indians, a group of small business people and a representative of disabled people. In contrast to all complaints submitted to date, this complaint narrates briefly the historical background of the power structures behind the Davos clique which have been constructed over the course of centuries.

Translator’s note: Supplementary information describing the class action will be issued shortly as an update to this translation.

The Indians (Algonquin) as a complainant group are of special significance since they – together with the Indians of the USA and Latin America – have for centuries been the object of attempted genocide by the conquerors. In the words of Michael Swinwood, “We are all Indians now.”
IV. Court rulings from Portugal and Ecuador

Some weeks ago, an appeal court in Portugal ruled that the PCR tests are not able to ascertain infection let alone illness, which is exactly what the inventor of the PCR tests, the Nobel Prizewinner Kary Mullis repeatedly emphasised - At issue was the case of four German tourists, one of whom had tested positive, and all of whom the authorities had placed under what the court determined to be a kind of house arrest – similar to the action of German administrative courts who follow blindly German fake science; thereby the appeal court confirmed an earlier finding that the quarantine was unconstitutional.

This judgement is a slap in the face for the German administrative courts, which were forced to concede that PCR tests cannot ascertain the presence of infection but nonetheless – in a case of crass perversion of justice – imagined that they had to follow the instructions of the Robert Koch Institute in its reliance on PCR tests and assumed that the healthcare system was on the brink of being overwhelmed (e.g. Higher Administrative Court Münster) – in this respect the Portuguese judgement demoted the German administrative courts to the status of banana republic. This is the shape of lessons in the rule of law by a Portuguese for a German court (the judgement linked to is in Portuguese so may need professional or machine translation).

Translator’s note: this english language report on the Portugal case was not included in the Fuellmich newsletter but has been added here to provide further background on the judgement.http://cognitive-liberty.online/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-test-as-unreliable/

A judgement pronounced on January 2, 2021, by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador ruled that all anti-Corona measures to date are based on mere conjectures without any basis in fact. After nine months it should finally be possible for the acting politicians to communicate clear, evidence-based assertions and base their measures on these. But since this has not happened, all the measures are unconstitutional. Below is the link to the judgement (we shall publish the judgement itself in the original on the website of the Corona Committee).

https://ricapod.buzzsprout.com/1409218/7133344-verfassungsgericht-kippt-ausnahmezustand-wir-machen-auf?fbclid=IwAR2xBQvUz63NMA3VGglPOxC2UCy3Fxfh_tveVRsBUSwFmLkdnsrdCYCwTao

Not one of the German administrative courts ruling on urgent injunctions nor indeed the Federal Constitutional Court have made any such pronouncement for Germany although of course the finding applies equally for Germany. This is a lesson from an Ecuadoran Court in the rule of law for the German courts.
V. Lawsuit to declare void vaccine approval; constitutional complaint by a German judge against the measures of a Federal Government which has practically been kidnapped by the Davos Clique – measures which are destroying democracy and the rule of law

Parallel to all these efforts, the Italian lawyer Dr. Renate Holzeisen is working with us and experts on a lawsuit against the EU Commission to have its approval of vaccines declared null & void – vaccines which are de facto untested and highly dangerous – in the case of the manufacturers Bioentech/Pfizer and Moderna, these are prohibited genetic experiments on humans. Meanwhile, the superbly versed and hard-hitting anti-Mafia public prosecutors are investigating the WHO and its Italian backers. In France work is progressing on a complaint to the Court for Human Rights.

A German judge (who we are in contact with) has submitted a constitutional complaint against the blanket measures of the Federal Government, these measures undermining democracy and the rule of law; the hope here is that – notwithstanding all concrete appearances – the head of the Constitutional Court has retained his independence. We have published these constitutional complaints on our news website and they can be submitted by anyone.

https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Verfassungsbeschwerde-Richter-anonym-30122020.pdf

We shall continue to keep you up to date about the legal developments, including with videos (although here there is a danger of them being removed from the platform). At the same time we must work on making the true facts known to as many people as possible. We will win because we must win.

Best regards

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M.

- Attorney –

PS: With developments in the courts proceeding rapidly, and since we shall probably participate with submissions of our own in at least one of the ongoing Anglo-American lawsuits, we intend in a fortnight to three week to conduct a Zoom conference for the clients we are representing; in this framework we shall discuss matters with some of the attorneys involved here and in the English-speaking countries and also with Professor Schwab; we shall also answer questions coming from the chat.

[greybeard]

UK Column News Friday 15th Jan


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzXM2aTRR38

[avid]

These observations and unbiased views in the news are gems, UK Column is well worth a regular visit, and so much information with references enable one to make logical choices.
Thanks Chris, it’s been bookmarked for years now 👍👍

[greybeard]

Thousands of COVID Vaccine Injuries, 13 Deaths Reported in U.S. + WHO: No Guarantee COVID Vaccines Prevent Infections + Scientists Warn of ‘Ghastly Future’



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/thousands-covid-vaccine-injuries-13-deaths-reported-december/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=1fd8cb58-95d0-46d9-b54f-3a3b61f97d5a

[greybeard]

30,000 Italian Restaurants Defy Lockdown Rules / Hugo talks


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YZGXNwri0o

[uzn]

Court in Peru: COVID-19 invention of a "global criminal elite"

A court in the South American state of Peru is currently attracting attention with a courageous decision. It states that the COVID-19 virus is an invention of a "global criminal elite" made up of billionaires like George Soros, the Rockefeller family and Microsoft entrepreneur and co-founder Bill Gates.

Pandemic "unpredictable, except for its creator"

As the criminal appeals chamber of the Chincha archipelago and the city of Pisco announced in a verdict, the pandemic was "unpredictable", except for its creators, "who have handled and continue to control with extreme secrecy within their environment and global corporations."

The background to this startling verdict was an apology from the judges responsible for the delay in handling the appeal of a defendant who applied for his (preliminary) pre-trial detention to be lifted, but whose application was delayed by the corona pandemic.

In the result, the three judges wrote:

"No world government, natural or legal person, nor the defense of the accused can claim that this pandemic has the quality of 'foreseeable', except for the creators of the new world order like Bill Gates, Soros, Rockefeller, etc."

Proceedings initiated against courageous judges

The statements of the three judges attracted a great deal of attention even beyond the country's borders. The accusation was immediately raised that the officials were serving and spreading conspiracy theories relating to the corona pandemic with their verdict.

The decentralized office for the control of the magistrate (Odecma) of Ica has therefore already initiated a preliminary investigation against the judges who had signed the decision. The aim of the investigation is to gather evidence that will help identify alleged irregularities committed by the judges.

Source:
https://www.20minutos.es/noticia/4539664/0/un-tribunal-peruano-acusa-a-bill-gates-soros-y-rockefeller-de-crear-la-covid-19/

[Eva2]

'PHYSICIAN SPILLS THE BEANS - LIVE ON AIR'

Canadian doctor doesn't hold back with how he feels about the COVID "phenomenon" and vaccines.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cBRDR1sCrf4y/?fbclid=IwAR2xNnENCxySeit_xQRpWO1KB7Tk2VRHEFPHPQvfHLArSCsjmhLY4jbE13Q

[greybeard]

Peter Hitchens defends lockdown scepticism: ‘Everything has to be questioned’ | 11-Jan-21


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTvRR_XeHbM

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 18th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGhr9Lv7h-g

[Delight]

I know lots of channels provide info but I watch The Highwire because it has consistently brought out the pertinent info we need to know.

Approaching Herd Stupidity (https://thehighwire.com/videos/approaching-herd-stupidity/)

[Sue (Ayt)]

This video is excellent, in my opinion. It explains the whole situation clearly, as far as the virus itself, and the vaccine, and the remedies.

Bio-warfare & Weaponization of Medicine Amid Covid

n this explosive interview with Senior Editor Alex Newman of The New American magazine, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Dr. Lee Merrit explains her belief that America is currently facing what appears to be biological warfare. Whether the Communist Chinese released the COVID19 virus on purpose or by accident is impossible to know, but the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective, she concludes.
mvI-_jXck7Y

[Eva2]

'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-times/why-the-pfizer-ceo-selling-62-of-his-stock-the-same-day-as-the-vaccine-announcement-looks-bad

[meat suit]

'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-times/why-the-pfizer-ceo-selling-62-of-his-stock-the-same-day-as-the-vaccine-announcement-looks-bad

this is ancient, 13th of november

[Eva2]

'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-times/why-the-pfizer-ceo-selling-62-of-his-stock-the-same-day-as-the-vaccine-announcement-looks-bad

this is ancient, 13th of november

Oh, ok - I hadn't seen it before and it was recently posted to me, so didn't check date.

[Philippe]

This video is excellent, in my opinion. It explains the whole situation clearly, as far as the virus itself, and the vaccine, and the remedies.

Bio-warfare & Weaponization of Medicine Amid Covid

n this explosive interview with Senior Editor Alex Newman of The New American magazine, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Dr. Lee Merrit explains her belief that America is currently facing what appears to be biological warfare. Whether the Communist Chinese released the COVID19 virus on purpose or by accident is impossible to know, but the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective, she concludes.
mvI-_jXck7Y

I find this highly intelligent and it is clearly explained how a messenger-RNA vaccine can be weaponized. From time to time I have protested against the fear mongering about the virus on this forum, and indeed if it is a bio-weapon the results in terms of direct casualties are ridiculously low. But if the vaccine installs a mechanism in the human cells that can be triggered in the future, that is a real danger. This is a video to be heard twice to really absorb the data and get out the warnings to everybody.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Like many of the side effects of all vaccines, this gene therapy will hyper-sensitize the immune system so that even the smallest irritant can cause a massive immune response. This is how Rheumatoid arthritis most probably occurs, as well as many allergies, not to mention rare and uncommon auto-immune maladies of the blood, organs, and tissues. The body does not like the introduction of foreign elements into its system - especially the adjutants like mercury, glycol, formaldehyde, nano-particles, and gene portions of cross-species, not to mention crude attempts at genetic alterations by the introduction of modified genetic material...these are poisons to the human body!

[ExomatrixTV]

⁣Future Effects of Experimental C0VID mRNA Vaccines - Part of Transhumanism Violating Nuremberg Code

cRAzSBCi2ncc
source (https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRAzSBCi2ncc/)

[Hughe]

Der Druck zur Impfung wird aufgebaut – Der Arbeitsplatzverlust droht – Na und, wo ist das Problem?
https://volldraht.de/gesellschaft/116-gesellschaft/4281-der-druck-zur-impfung-wird-aufgebaut-der-arbeitsplatzverlust-droht-na-und-wo-ist-das-problem

Jörn Baumann
Erstellt: 10. Januar 2021
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 10. Januar 2021
Zugriffe: 584
Traduction approximative en français ci-dessous

La pression en faveur de la vaccination s'accroît - La perte d'emploi est imminente - Et alors, quel est le problème ?

(Rough translation from German)

The pressure to vaccinate is building - Job loss is looming - So what, what's the problem?

The freedom of choice or the right of self-determination is influenced by subtle peripheral measures. If you are not vaccinated, you lose your job, can't go to the movies, can't shop everywhere, and so on.

The decision to get vaccinated would again be "voluntary" and bang, you have the slave ring around. Because now everything is carried out "voluntarily" by the subtle constraints of a totalitarian system. The example of the alleged Dr. Weiland is particularly perversely set up: "Who does not want the vaccination, is released from work without salary".

photo_2021-01-10_07-05-12.jpg
"FIRST BOSS GETS SERIOUS
No salary without vaccination!

Dr. Maximilian Weiland (...)He has his practice manager send a short message with the appointment. It literally says: "All employees and dentists will be vaccinated. Those who do not want the vaccination will be released from work without pay."(...) How many of the employees followed the request is not clear. Apparently, acceptance among the workforce was high: according to BILD am Sonntag information, 36 to 38 vaccine doses are said to have been ordered. Only four are said not to have been vaccinated because the colleagues were ill or taking antibiotics.(...)"

https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/news/inland/news-inland/erster-chef-macht-ernst-ohne-impfung-kein-gehalt-74818276.bild.html

Such Blender, if it is a real physician, like the radiating smiling Dr. Maximilian Weiland and their imitators will have to pay the price for perfide agitation. The example of the alleged Dr. Weiland is particularly perversely set up: " Who does not want the vaccination, is released without salary from the work", with it the loss of the salary payment is used directly for the production of the existence fear of the employees, in order to pull through an ideologically conditioned culling of humans.

We call it genocide, not so long ago it was said " There are the showers, we delouse you". Today it is the institutes, like the RKI, who treated people like guinea pigs during the Nazi era, who recommend the vaccination circus. We will keep an eye on this "doctor" and his employees, as well as on the nursing homes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

The first reports from caregivers reach us that the vaccinated seniors are dying and in some cases only 3 caregivers are still operational because the rest of the staff is lying flat, unable to work. The three caregivers are the ones who refused the vaccination.

And another one who can't talk his way out of it later by saying he didn't know anything.

We are still waiting for the other reports that may or may not confirm our prognosis about the genocide. So far, everything is following the same pattern as the "Spanish flu".

The announcement of the contagious "viral infection" that resembles a flu, then the intervention of the doctors with their "protective vaccinations", and the dying begins. The people culled by syringe are counted as victims of the "viral infection" and already the narrative of the terrible plague fits.

In the present we have the fictitious pandemic and a flu that has disappeared from the media. The need for "vaccinations" is generated via absurd mass testing with the false positives of a PCR test that cannot represent an infection.

With vaccinations already underway, seniors and caregivers are first hosed down or eliminated. The resulting pathogenic declines and vaccine injuries are poo-pooed to the fictitious pandemic, and presto, they have the much-needed increase in mortality statistics, which had been declining up to that point.

Once again, with the onset of vaccination, the declining death statistics become an increasing death rate.

This is the hallmark of every major pandemic from the past, that it was only with the "protective measures" that mass deaths began. So that the required mortality rate is also fulfilled, one suggests the necessary 2nd and 3rd vaccination.

So if you should be forced by your employer to a vaccination on a "voluntary" basis, your protection is to call in sick, to be dismissed or, if possible, to resign yourself.
Version française - traduction approximative


La liberté de choix ou le droit à l'autodétermination sont influencés par des mesures périphériques subtiles. Si vous n'êtes pas vacciné, vous perdez votre emploi, vous ne pouvez pas aller au cinéma, vous ne pouvez pas faire vos courses partout, etc.

La décision de se faire vacciner serait à nouveau "volontaire" et bang, vous avez le cercle d'esclaves autour de vous. Parce que maintenant tout est fait "volontairement" par les contraintes subtiles d'un système totalitaire. L'exemple du prétendu Dr Weiland est particulièrement pervers : "Ceux qui ne veulent pas la vaccination seront libérés du travail sans salaire".

photo_2021-01-10_07-05-12.jpg
"LE PREMIER PATRON FAIT DU SÉRIEUX
Pas de salaire sans vaccination !

Le Dr Maximilian Weiland (...)Il demande à son directeur de cabinet d'envoyer un bref message avec le rendez-vous. Il est littéralement écrit : "Tous les employés et les dentistes seront vaccinés. Ceux qui ne veulent pas la vaccination seront libérés du travail sans rémunération" (...) On ne sait pas exactement combien d'employés se sont conformés à la demande. Apparemment, l'acceptation au sein du personnel était élevée : selon les informations de BILD am Sonntag, 36 à 38 doses de vaccins auraient été commandées. Seuls quatre d'entre eux n'auraient pas été vaccinés parce que les collègues étaient malades ou prenaient des antibiotiques (...)".

https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/news/inland/news-inland/erster-chef-macht-ernst-ohne-impfung-kein-gehalt-74818276.bild.html

Ces faux, s'il s'agit d'un vrai médecin, comme le souriant et rayonnant Dr Maximilian Weiland et leurs imitateurs devront payer le prix d'une perfide agitation. L'exemple du prétendu Dr Weiland est particulièrement pervers : "Celui qui ne veut pas la vaccination sera libéré de son travail sans salaire", la perte du paiement du salaire est donc directement utilisée pour générer la peur existentielle des employés afin de procéder à un abattage de personnes conditionné par l'idéologie.

Nous appelons cela un génocide, il n'y a pas si longtemps c'était "il y a les douches, on vous épouille". Aujourd'hui, ce sont les instituts, comme le RKI, qui traitaient les gens comme des cobayes pendant l'ère nazie, qui recommandent le cirque de la vaccination. Nous allons garder un œil sur ce "docteur" et ses employés, tout comme les maisons de retraite du Mecklembourg-Poméranie occidentale.

Les premiers rapports des soignants nous parviennent indiquant que les personnes âgées vaccinées sont en train de mourir et que, dans certains cas, seuls 3 soignants sont aptes au travail car le reste du personnel est couché à plat, incapable de travailler. Les trois soignants sont ceux qui ont refusé la vaccination.

Et un autre qui ne peut pas s'en sortir en disant plus tard qu'il ne savait pas.

Nous attendons toujours les autres rapports qui pourraient ou non confirmer notre prédiction de génocide. Jusqu'à présent, tout suit le même schéma que la "grippe espagnole".

L'annonce de l'"infection virale" contagieuse qui ressemble à la grippe, puis l'intervention des médecins avec leurs "vaccinations", et les mourants commencent. Les personnes abattues à la seringue sont comptées comme des victimes de "l'infection virale" et le récit de cette terrible peste colle à la réalité.

Nous avons actuellement une pandémie fictive et une grippe qui a disparu des médias. Le besoin de "vaccinations" est généré par des tests de masse absurdes avec les faux positifs d'un test PCR qui ne peut pas représenter une infection.

Les vaccinations étant déjà en cours, les personnes âgées et les soignants sont les premiers à être lésés ou éliminés. Les baisses de pathogènes et les blessures causées par les vaccins qui en résultent sont attribuées à la pandémie fictive, et presto, elles ont l'augmentation bien nécessaire des statistiques de décès, qui étaient jusqu'à présent en baisse.

Une fois de plus, avec le début des vaccinations, la statistique des décès en baisse devient une statistique des décès en hausse.

C'est la caractéristique de toutes les grandes pandémies du passé, que ce n'est qu'avec les "mesures de protection" que les décès en masse ont commencé. Pour que le taux de mortalité requis soit atteint, les gens suggèrent que les 2e et 3e vaccinations sont nécessaires.

Ainsi, si votre employeur vous oblige à vous faire vacciner sur une base "volontaire", votre protection consiste à vous faire porter malade, à vous faire licencier ou, si possible, à démissionner.

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 20th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71QIIrpTDOU

[greybeard]

Coгonaviгus in context


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FZvdFpsDTg

[onawah]

Fauci: COVID Vaccine May Become Mandatory
01/20/21
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fauci-covid-19-vaccine-may-become-mandatory/

(Bold letters my emphasis)

"Dr. Anthony Fauci told media vaccines may be required by some businesses, for overseas travel, and when it comes to schools, “Everything’s on the table.” But as more vaccine-related deaths and injuries are reported, the less likely mandates will become widespread.
Story at-a-glance:

According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, some institutions will undoubtedly require employees to be vaccinated, adding that it’s “quite possible” the vaccine will be required for overseas travel.
The COVID-19 vaccine is still in the experimental stage as they have not completed stage 3 clinical trials yet. The mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental, and the sheer speed at which the vaccines have been developed and tested precludes us from knowing much about their side effects, especially in the long term.
As of Dec. 18, 2020, the adverse event rate in the U.S. was 2.79%. This means your risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than your risk of dying from COVID-19, which has an overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate of just 0.26%.
If an experimental vaccine were to be mandated, it would set a frightening precedent and pave the way for all sorts of nonconsensual medical experimentation on the general public, going forward.
The COVID-19 vaccines are not being evaluated for their ability to actually prevent infection and transmission of the virus. And, if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalizations or deaths, then it cannot create the vaccine-acquired herd immunity required to end the pandemic.


Will the COVID-19 vaccine become mandatory? That’s a question many are asking these days and, by the looks of it, the answer may well be yes — although as I’ll explain later, I suspect the harms of the vaccine will become so apparent that it’ll kill such efforts before they become widespread.

In a Jan. 1, 2021, Newsweek interview, Dr. Anthony Fauci said he was “sure” some institutions and businesses will require employees to be vaccinated, and that it’s “quite possible” the vaccine will be required for overseas travel.

When asked about the possibility of mandating the vaccine on a local level, such as for children attending school, he stated that “Everything will be on the table for discussion.” That said, he pointed out that since “we almost never mandate things federally” — with regard to health — he doesn’t believe a national vaccine mandate will be enacted.

In related news Dec. 21, 2020, presidential candidate Joe Biden rolled up his sleeve to get publicly inoculated against COVID-19, stating that the vaccine was “nothing to worry about.” He’s also gone on record saying he will push for a 100-day mask mandate in federal buildings if he wins the presidency.

Can experimental vaccines be mandated?
While many vaccines are required by state or local law, the thing that sets the COVID-19 vaccine apart from all others is the fact that it is still an experimental vaccine. While Moderna and Pfizer have been granted emergency use authorization for their respective vaccine candidates, they still haven’t even completed stage 3 clinical trials yet.

The mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental, and the sheer speed at which the vaccines have been developed and tested precludes us from knowing much about their side effects, especially in the long term.

As of Dec. 18, 2020, the adverse event rate in the U.S. was 2.79%. This means your risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than your risk of dying from COVID-19, which has an overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate of just 0.26%. Among those under the age of 40, the infection fatality rate is a mere 0.01%.

If an experimental vaccine were to be mandated, it would set a frightening precedent and pave the way for all sorts of nonconsensual medical experimentation on the general public, going forward.

In a Dec. 29, 2020, article in JAMA, the authors discuss the legal possibility of mandating COVID-19 vaccines, stating that “SARS-CoV-2 vaccines hold promise to control the pandemic and help restore normal social and economic life.”

However, this is questionable, considering the fact that the effectiveness of the vaccines is only measured by their ability to lessen moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms such as cough and headache. Presumably, this would lower the risk of hospitalization and death for vaccinated individuals.

However, as explained in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged,” the vaccines were not evaluated for their ability to actually prevent infection and transmission of the virus. And, if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalizations or deaths, then it cannot create the vaccine-acquired herd immunity required to end the pandemic.

What’s more, in a Nov. 26, 2020, BMJ article, Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, points out that while Pfizer claims its vaccine is 95% effective, this is the relative risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is actually less than 1%. He also stresses that severe side effects appear commonplace:

“Moderna’s press release states that 9% experienced grade 3 myalgia and 10% grade 3 fatigue; Pfizer’s statement reported 3.8% experienced grade 3 fatigue and 2% grade 3 headache. Grade 3 adverse events are considered severe, defined as preventing daily activity. Mild and moderate severity reactions are bound to be far more common.”

New York considers forced vaccination bill
None of these open questions is stopping the New York Senate from considering a forced vaccination bill (A4169). As reported by constitutional attorney KrisAnne Hall:

“January 6 New York Assemblymen will be asked to vote on a bill that will authorize the Governor and/or health officials to seize custody of New Yorkers, imprison, and force vaccinate them without due process.

“This bill is not only a threat to the Constitution of New York, the people of New York, but also everyone in America if you consider the way certain legislation can spread throughout America in the age ‘crisis’ …

“If passed this legislation will place in the hands of the Governor, or his designated agent, the full and autonomous authority to ‘order’ the ‘removal’ and ‘detention’ of every person the Governor or his ‘delegee’ determines ‘may pose’ a ‘significant and imminent threat to public health’ …

“Once some health department worker thinks a New Yorker is a carrier or contact to a carrier, that person will be seized and held without hearing, trial, due process, or bond for a period of time to be determined by the health department.”

As noted by Hall, this bill violates the U.S. Constitution in several different ways. For starters, it eliminates your right to due process before forcing you into the custody of health officials, as well as your right to trial “as required by Article I sec 1 and Article VI Sec 18a of the New York Constitution.”

It also “arbitrarily reduces the well-established standard of strict scrutiny required for the infringement of these fundamental rights to the lesser standard of ‘clear and convincing evidence’ which will be determined solely by the Governor or some worker in the New York Health Department.” This, in turn, violates the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

Thirdly, “A-416 is a bold violation of Article 1 sec 5 and Article 1 sec 12 of the New York Constitution” as it would deprive you of your “inherent rights to due process related to a search and seizure” of your property and/or your body.

“New Yorkers cannot allow that to happen. Everyone in New York needs to contact their Senator and Assemblyman and DEMAND they vote no on A-416. Everyone in America needs to contact their State and demand that such legislation never be drafted,” Hall writes.

In her blog post, Hall includes a sample letter and phone script you can use when contacting your representatives.

Blackmailing the public to force vaccine uptake
Getting back to the JAMA article discussing the legal possibility of mandating COVID-19 vaccines, the authors point out that mandating a vaccine while it’s still under an emergency use approval is “legally and ethically problematic.”

“Vaccine mandates are unjustified because an EUA requires less safety and efficacy data than full Biologics License Application (BLA) approval. Individuals would also likely distrust vaccine mandates under emergency use, viewing it as ongoing medical research,” the article states.

Once the vaccine is fully licensed, however, vaccine mandates “could be imposed in multiple sectors,” according to the authors. Still, they point out that “Given the rarity of adult mandates, states are unlikely to enact mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for the adult population, especially in the absence of long-term safety data.”

Private companies, on the other hand, can require vaccination as a condition of employment, and according to a Yale CEO survey, 71% of company executives supported the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the workplace.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has already ruled that businesses can compel their employees to get vaccinated, and that they may fire those who refuse. Employers must, however, allow for medical exemptions and “offer reasonable accommodations based on religion or disability.”
Schools may also end up requiring COVID-19 vaccination for students, faculty and staff, and it seems likely the vaccine may simply be added to the ACIP-recommended list of childhood vaccinations. Most troubling, however, is the proposal to require vaccination as a condition of service. According to the JAMA article:

“It is foreseeable that businesses in certain high-risk settings could require proof of vaccination as a condition of service, such as in long-distance travel (plane, rail, bus), restaurants, and entertainment (sports, movies, theater).

While states might be constitutionally barred from requiring vaccines to participate in religious worship, it is conceivable that some churches, synagogues, or mosques might consider such conditions for congregants. Local or state governments could also require vaccination as a condition of service.”

To be clear, even if state and federal governments don’t mandate the vaccine, by barring unvaccinated people from traveling, participating in social events and even entering into government buildings, they are essentially mandating it. Unvaccinated people would become second-class citizens that aren’t permitted to work, travel, conduct business or engage socially. What kind of life is that?

Yet this is precisely what we may be facing. As noted by the JAMA authors, “If scientific and logistical challenges can be overcome, linking vaccinations as a condition of providing service could be an effective incentive for vaccination.” They really should call it what it is: blackmail.

Many front-line workers refuse COVID-19 vaccine
Distribution of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines began at the end of December 2020. In the U.S., most states have elected to begin distribution among front-line health care workers and in senior care facilities. However, despite media fanfare, many health care workers are leery of the vaccine.

According to news reports, about half of all front-line workers in Riverside County, California, have refused the vaccine, as have 60% of nursing home staff in Ohio, 40% of staff at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital and 40% of LA’s front-line workers. Similar rates of vaccine refusal are being reported in several European countries.

Interestingly, a survey by the National Association of Health Care Assistants revealed a whopping 72% of certified nursing assistants plan to refuse the vaccine, as are 55% of firefighters in New York, according to a December 2020 poll by the Uniformed Firefighters Association. The reason for this widespread hesitation is as understandable as it is justifiable. As noted in the Western Journal:

“Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, any skepticism about the virulence of the virus or wisdom of draconian shutdowns was met with the mantra ‘follow the science’ to stifle any serious debate.

“All along the way, however, officials did anything but as they imposed useless mask mandates, allowed Black Lives Matter protests despite closing businesses and imposing social distancing on everyone else, and even expressed skepticism about any vaccine simply because it was developed at the behest of President Donald Trump.

“But worst of all, officials undermined science by suggesting that vaccination distribution begin based on race rather than in the nursing home populations that were actually ravaged by the virus.

“In short, governments and the medical community killed any credibility they had at the beginning of the pandemic with their repeated hypocrisy and mixed messages. It’s no wonder these workers are reluctant to follow them now and are instead relying on their gut instincts to mistrust the untested vaccine and COVID-19 agenda.”

Side effects and deaths are stacking up
The fact that high rates of side effects and sudden deaths are already being reported will hardly improve matters in coming weeks and months. For example, Jan. 4, 2021, RT reported that health authorities in Portugal were “on alert” after the sudden death of a 41-year-old pediatric surgery assistant who had been in good health. She was found dead in her bed just two days after being inoculated with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Dec. 30, 2020, the Daily Star reported the death of an elderly resident in Lucerne, Switzerland, five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. The man had previously “reacted negatively” to the seasonal influenza vaccine. According to the report, he suffered from dementia but was otherwise in good health.

Dec. 26, 2020, a Boston doctor with severe shellfish allergy suffered a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to the Moderna vaccine. As reported by RT:

“Within minutes, Sadrzadeh’s tongue and throat began to tingle and go numb, a reaction that he associated with his shellfish allergy. Even more concerning, his blood pressure then dipped so low that it wasn’t even detectable with a monitor. Luckily, the doctor had brought his own EpiPen, which he administered on himself before hospital staff rushed him to the emergency room …

“‘I feel that if I did not have my EpiPen with me, I would be intubated right now, because it was that severe,’ he said, adding that it was the worst allergic reaction he had experienced since he was 11 years old. The physician said he now recommends that people with allergies receive the vaccine in a hospital setting, instead of getting it from a clinic or local provider …

“The concerning case is the first of its kind to be linked to the Moderna jab. Officials with the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are investigating at least six cases of severe allergic reactions occurring in people who took the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”

A Dec. 21, 2020, article in The Defender reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is investigating a series of allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. Aside from the Boston doctor, other reports of allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock, include four health care workers in Illinois and three health care workers in Alaska. Cases of anaphylaxis also emerged within days of the rollout of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines in the U.K.

Thousands injured in mere days
According to the CDC, by Dec. 18, 2020, 112,807 Americans had received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Of those, 3,150 suffered one or more “health impact events,” defined as being “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.”

That’s 2.79%. Extrapolated to the total U.S. population of 328.2 million, we can then expect 9,156,780 Americans to be injured by the vaccine if every single man, woman and child is vaccinated. Is this really reasonable for a virus that has an average survival rate of 99.74%?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/v-safe-active-surveillance-for-covid-19-vaccines.jpg

In the end, I suspect and predict that widespread mandates for COVID-19 vaccination will not take place. I believe there will simply be too many injuries and deaths from the first and second rounds of vaccinations, and that will destroy any and all vaccine mandate arguments.

Allergy alert
Many suspect polyethylene glycol (PEG), found in both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines, might be the culprit causing allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “studies show that 1 in 7 Americans may unknowingly be at risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to PEG.”

Kennedy believes “everyone should be screened for anti-PEG antibodies before getting the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines,” adding that “It is unconscionable that, instead, the FDA and CDC are encouraging people to go ahead and risk a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction and just assume that someone will be on hand to save them.”It’s worth noting that the CDC has updated its vaccine guidance in response to reports of allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine, stating that:

“If you have had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. If you had a severe allergic reaction after getting the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, CDC recommends that you should not get the second dose.

“CDC has also learned of reports that some people have experienced non-severe allergic reactions within 4 hours after getting vaccinated (known as immediate allergic reactions), such as hives, swelling, and wheezing (respiratory distress).

“If you have had an immediate allergic reaction — even if it was not severe — to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, CDC recommends that you should not get either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

“If you had an immediate allergic reaction after getting the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get the second dose … People who are allergic to PEG or polysorbate should not get an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.”

COVID-19 outbreaks occurring among vaccinated
Yet another interesting problem that has arisen is that many newly vaccinated individuals are suddenly testing positive for COVID-19. In a San Jose, California, hospital, 51 employees tested positive within 10 days of vaccination, although it’s unclear whether all of them had actually received the vaccine.

One died from COVID-19 complications. Interestingly, the outbreak is being blamed on an employee who showed up wearing an inflatable Christmas costume. The same pattern has been reported elsewhere.

For example, in Israel, 21 residents of a retirement home tested positive for the virus after receiving the vaccine. Authorities pointed out that since two doses are required to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2, you can still catch it after the first dose. The same argument was made in the San Jose hospital case.

A doctor in Philadelphia also tested positive after taking the vaccine, as did a nurse in San Diego. In each case, health authorities have insisted that it’s not the vaccine causing the problem but, rather, the fact that the shot needs time to work.

Overall, there’s plenty of reason to be cautious and delay COVID-19 vaccination as long as possible. As mentioned earlier, I believe that, in time, the harms will become apparent enough that any talk about mandating these vaccines will simply evaporate."

Originally published by Mercola.https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/19/covid-19-vaccine-may-become-mandatory.aspx?

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 22nd January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edln7eWn4ck

[Hughe]

Source: https://on.rt.com/b06b

‘Catastrophically wrong’: German court declares regional lockdown UNCONSTITUTIONAL in ‘politically explosive’ decision

A German district court has declared a strict lockdown imposed by the government of the central state of Thuringia last spring unconstitutional, as it acquitted a person accused of violating it.
A trivial case about a man violating strict German lockdown rules by celebrating a birthday with his friends has ended up in a decision the German media described as “politically explosive.” A district court in the city of Weimar did not just acquit the defendant but also stated that the authorities themselves breached Germany's basic law.

Thuringia's spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people's lives,” the court said, justifying its decision. It particularly condemned a restriction limiting private gatherings to the members of one household and one person outside of it.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Source: https://www.hangthecensors.com/489410.html

British legislator calls for widespread vitamin D rollout following 82% reduction in COVID-19 deaths in Spain

(Natural News) British Member of Parliament David Davis is urging the British government to strengthen its vitamin D supplementation program for people at-risk of COVID-19 following an impressive precedent set by Andalusia in Spain.

Speaking before the House of Commons on Thursday, Davis said that Britain should follow the lead of Andalusia, which distributed calcifediol, a vitamin D supplement, to care home residents last November. Since then, the Spanish region’s COVID-19 deaths dropped by 82 percent.

Because of this, Davis is imploring the British government to increase its dosage recommendations and implement a widespread vitamin D rollout.

The state already provides free vitamin D supplies to care home residents under the Public Health England‘s advice that they get 10 micrograms (mcg) daily for protection. However, Davis said this amount is too small to have a significant effect and the program should be for all at-risk populations.

[TomKat]

Looks like even vastly under-reported govt figures are showing a lot of deaths from the mRNA vaccines:

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/181-dead-in-the-u-s-during-2-week-period-from-experimental-covid-injections-how-long-will-we-continue-to-allow-mass-murder-by-lethal-injection/

[Anna70]

British legislator calls for widespread vitamin D rollout following 82% reduction in COVID-19 deaths in Spain

Looking for answers to the question "What's taken them so long?" would no doubt open endless cans of endless worms. But at least it is some progress. Better to add K2 as well, to prevent calcification in the wrong places.

[TomKat]

British legislator calls for widespread vitamin D rollout following 82% reduction in COVID-19 deaths in Spain

Looking for answers to the question "What's taken them so long?" would no doubt open endless cans of endless worms. But at least it is some progress. Better to add K2 as well, to prevent calcification in the wrong places.

I remember hearing on the radio that people who stayed in their homes during the lockdown were getting covid symptoms at a much higher rate than those who didn't stay locked down. Vitamin D is a likely explanation. Every winter people get the flu because they stay indoors.

[greybeard]

The Full Scary Story of Agenda 21 and Your Future

Dr Vernon Coleman

International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, explains what your future is likely to be and who is in control.
For more unbiased information about other important matters, please visit https://www.vernoncoleman.com
Thank you for all your support.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpDCa7UVAdE

[onawah]

DR. SIMONE GOLD – THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CV19 VACCINE--Frontline Doctors
January 23, 2021
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-simone-gold-the-truth-about-the-cv19-vaccine/
Video here:
https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/api/v4/streams/free/LWA1/42eebb098df4e2513db28a05a0d99db79279d63c/8460ca

"On January 3rd, 2021, Emergency Physician, Dr. Simone Gold gave this gobsmacking talk on the Great Awakening show about the breathtaking skullduggery that was coordinated worldwide across governments and health agencies against the drug, hydroxychloroquine, in the ordering of needless masks, lockdowns and now, in mandating the experimental vaccine.

I recommend that everyone share this with their normie friends and loved ones.

Dr. Gold says, “I come before you on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors, which is a volunteer physicians organization that we started specifically to combat the serious and life-threatening disinformation that has really taken over America and really, the entire Globe.

Dr. Gold decided to speak out after she prescribed hydroxychloroquine and zinc to a COVID-positive patient, who recovered completely in 48 hours. However she, herself was called into see her Medical Director, who threatened to fire her, while her State Board threatened her with a potential investigation of unprofessional conduct.

“We are licensed as individuals. It’s actually against the law to have a corporate practice of medicine…it has to be the individual doctor physician, that’s why patients go to multiple doctors.

“It’s very, very scary stuff. I’ve been a doctor for a very long time. Before me, my father was a doctor. I’ve never seen anything like this, where we have groups of physicians or scientists or government bureaucrat agencies essentially lying to the American people and people across the world.”

The publication of fraudulent studies in the world’s pre-eminent medical journals, including The Lancet and the draconian decrees have crashed the world economy and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

The experimental vaccine has not been shown to reduce mortality, in a disease which already has an almost non-existent mortality rate and there’s no evidence that it stops transmission. Why is the vaccine being mandated, again?

Dr Gold raises the very real security threat of mandating an experimental vaccine. “What if, for example you’ve given that vaccine to all of your healthcare workers and you’ve given that vaccine to all of your military and all of your police officers. I find this shocking, as a public policy matter, that we would even consider giving anything to our healthy first responders and frontline people who defend our country…It’s so shocking to accept that kind of risk.”

She ends her talk with a call to action. “We, at America’s Frontline Doctors intend to fight th urge that’s sweeping the globe to mandate people taking an experimental biological agent. This is a big fight we have on our hands…we’re very concerned with private businesses mandating this; employers, schools and travel – airlines, in particular.

“You can imagine if all the airlines got together, the CEOs and said, “You know what? We’re just going to mandate this – the 6 biggest ones all got together and said that. It’s just like the masks, right? You can’t avoid their mandates. This is a very big problem. So, America’s Frontline Doctors is tackling this. We intend to talk to the decision-makers in the airline industry.

“One of our tools in that battle will be to go in armed with at least 1 million signatures of human beings who are going to say, “No! We are not going to do business with anybody – and we’re not going to comply with anyone who’s going to mandate this…everyone hearing this can agree, we don’t need the CEOs of big companies forcing experimental biological agents on anyone…

“We are going to be at their mercy if we don’t get ahead of them. We must get ahead of that bad decision that they seem headed towards making. Qantas Airlines has already said that they’re going to do this…

Sign the petition and get everybody you know to sign it! https://stopmedicaldiscrimination.org/

She says, “This is your life! Are you going to be able to travel?…frame this as a Human Rights issue. You can’t mandate that human beings take experimental biological agents.” "

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 25th January 2021

Lockdown extended -- new vaccines needed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmUhZ2Q6Ddo

[onawah]

Dr. Tom Cowan's video which was deleted from youtube is now on bitchute:

(In which he explains quite convincingly how the "science" around genetics, viruses, vaccines, etc. is far from "settled", and how little is known and understood even by the "experts".
He also touches on why he and others such as Dr. Kaufman believe that EMFs are partly responsible for what are being identified as symptoms of COVID.
And reveals that he is a student of Anthroposophy, which was founded by Rufolf Steiner.
Steiner predicted over 100 years ago a vaccine which would disconnect humans from their spiritual energetic bodies, which appears to be the agenda behind the COVID vaccines, ie to create unquestioning obedience to the will of the controllers.

/Ifi3PlHH2S33/?fbclid=IwAR3BTxxlZFzDH_BXSPyKLqfYq6ffLNBo_6spZEwhY-hBo9nVhkNVomEcJ9E

[Tintin]

Al-Jazeera nearly always produce documentaries that cover their subject matter extremely well.

This is looking like a potential 'must see'. I'l try and get to it later.

3 Days that Stopped the World - Al-Jazeera Investigations

Description:


Mid January, 2020. Two Chinese journalists were sent to Wuhan to investigate a mysterious virus outbreak. This is their account of the three days before Wuhan entered lockdown. The World Health Organization held meetings to decide if the epidemic was a global health emergency. It did not consider it so. When the journalists arrive, locals were busy preparing for upcoming Chinese New Year celebration. At the time, not much was known about the virus that was just days away from changing the world. Then came a pivotal announcement: human-to-human transmission was confirmed. The journalists witnessed a city of 11 million people transform overnight. Initial nonchalance was quickly replaced by panic. People started wearing masks, shops were shuttered. They shuttled between the increasingly saturated hospitals and Huanan Seafood Market, at the time thought to be the epicentre of this contagion. And they were stopped at every juncture. Their reports were censored and their investigations blocked

abeYukTNmj0

[gnostic9]

Dr James Lyons-Weiler PHD – Why the untested ‘Covid vaccine’ is so unsafe, how sanitisers can suppress reproduction and how he was offered a bribe to tell lies about vaccine consequences




https://zb10-7gsop1v78.bitchute.com/NMbXnWH8Dddj/DNOZvsXTPf0E.mp4


Love peace and joy to all!

[Delight]

Dr James Lyons-Weiler PHD – Why the untested ‘Covid vaccine’ is so unsafe, how sanitisers can suppress reproduction and how he was offered a bribe to tell lies about vaccine consequences




https://zb10-7gsop1v78.bitchute.com/NMbXnWH8Dddj/DNOZvsXTPf0E.mp4


Love peace and joy to all!

Thanks for that link.
It is still on youtube still.

OoeCB0MudgA

In case anyone is interested, that talk came from the Medical Freedom Press Conference 10/20/20

PcjUPhbiNr8

Listen to this one too


The beloved "Dr. Neu" speaks about vaccine risks and injury.
Dr. James NeuenschwanderMD, founded Bio Energy Medical Center, a multidisciplinary, integrative medical practice located in Ann Arbor, MI, Since the formation of his practice in 1988, he has treated children and adults with complex, chronic health problems which have not responded to conventional therapies and strives to promote wellness through prevention. His approach consists of searching for and remediating root causes.
Dr. Neu graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science Degree, in the honors program in cellular and molecular biology from the University of Michigan in 1981. He went on to receive his Medical Degree, from the University of Michigan in 1985. Dr. Neu is board-certified in Emergency Medicine (BCEM/AAPS), Integrative and Holistic Medicine (ABIM/AAPS, ABIHM), as well as Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine (ABAARM).

3h7Q2RNKZmo

[DaveToo]

Great Covid vaccine news for a change! :clapping:

https://globalnews.ca/news/7597336/covid-vaccine-merck-data/

[DaveToo]

This article has nothing but gushing praise for Israel,
boasting it is the leader in the world for vaccinating its population,
25% now vaccinated.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/why-israels-vaccine-success-might-be-hard-replicate/617780/

But it fails to mention one small detail.

Since Dec 19, 2020 when the Covid vaccine program started in Israel Covid cases soared from less than 2000/day to more than 9000/day and are now at a record high. :facepalm:

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 27th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA8_lb8nk-4

[avid]

Excellent as always.
What’s happening in the Netherlands, the ‘least’ corrupt police in EU!
The psychobabble from UK government and MSM concerning the latest ‘100,000’ deaths figures’ spinning of real data.
The insincerity of the bedraggled pm, not looking at the camera, and a huge backlogue of data info proving this lockdown is so very unnecessary.
The BBC indoctrinating children - unforgiveable.
More info on GMaF - the clamping down on proven cancer cures, false imprisonment of practitioners.
Every Monday Wednesday and Friday GMT live news - credible guests, reporting as it should be done.

[Blastolabs]

181 reported deaths to CDC
A study from Harvard estimated that less than 1% of cases are even reported.

Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is an issue that was shown to be a problem during the 10+ years of vaccine trials for SARS and MERS.
ADE often leads to death because the antibodies backfire and aid a virus in infection and replication.

There has not been enough time to be sure either way if ADE will be an issue with Sars-Cov-2 but currently available data seems to indicate that this should be a problem .
Because it takes time for a vaccinated person to begin producing antibodies and THEN get infected with the virus this has seemingly gone unnoticed until now.

Social distancing is slowing down this process as well.

It is a legal requirement that people give INFORMED consent when they are vaccinated which is why I am sharing this data as collected by the CDC




Links to detailed descriptions of each death are below.
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&GROUP2=SYM&GROUP3=MAN&GROUP4=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&DIED=Yes

https://www.thearkivist.net/openvaers/covid-data?fbclid=IwAR3RhHyrKYaMSGd8onqSsr7UA_7fCDbTMc3Foz0mWomU58IItjqzNEe0Gq8

[Philippe]

This article has nothing but gushing praise for Israel,
boasting it is the leader in the world for vaccinating its population,
25% now vaccinated.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/why-israels-vaccine-success-might-be-hard-replicate/617780/

But it fails to mention one small detail.

Since Dec 19, 2020 when the Covid vaccine program started in Israel Covid cases soared from less than 2000/day to more than 9000/day and are now at a record high. :facepalm:

https://www.francesoir.fr/opinions-tribunes/la-mortalite-en-israel-continue-daugmenter-contrairement-ce-que-dit-le-parisien?fbclid=IwAR1I4FKlPREHjlkRwzR_cmE4VbSD7CPy3-r0zo_WQgc1ha7M9Ae_JEKnt-Y

TRANSLATION:

TRIBUNE: In Israel, Covid19 mortality is not zero, but instead broke its record on January 26th!

The media campaign glorifying the Israeli vaccination campaign without looking at the evolution of the epidemic [1] forces us to revisit the subject of contamination and mortality in Israel concomitant with vaccination so that our readers benefit from balanced information.

Close
volume_off

False information

An article in Le Parisien by J. Cl.m particularly appealed to him, saying: "Zero, zero. In the last 24 hours, Israel has not counted any new contamination and deaths of coronavirus. Who could have given him such a bad information? Was it cheated by a Pfizer employee? He should have checked his information completely inconsistent with the figures of the previous ten days recalled below [3]. This is particularly serious because the television channels broadcast the same message, probably trusting him.

In no epidemic in ancient and recent history, in one day, there was a total drop in contamination from 4492 to zero, nor from 79 deaths to 0. The implausibility of this data should have stopped him and justified an audit, a golden rule for investigative journalists.

A risky bet

The Israeli government has achieved the feat of vaccinating nearly 3 million of its citizens in five weeks, but was it right to turn them so quickly into guinea pigs?

From a scientific point of view, this is exciting because it is a phase 3 therapeutic trial of unparalleled scale that will provide answers to questions that Pfizer has not answered in its botched trials.

But from an ethical and medical point of view, it's very questionable. The World Medical Association in the Helsinki Declaration recalling the Nuremberg Lessons stipulates that an experimental treatment [4] should only be administered if it is likely to render a personal service to the person receiving it after fair information.

However, among those under 45 without comorbidity, which represents 70% of Israelis, the benefit-risk balance can only be unfavourable; at this age, the natural risk of the disease is very small, while serious complications, particularly allergic ones, have been observed and it is still not known whether the vaccine is likely to prevent contamination, or whether it is capable of reducing mortality. Close monitoring of the epidemic by examining the incidence of contamination and post-vaccination mortality is therefore crucial.

And in at-risk elderly people (who are extremely poorly represented in trials) the risks of serious vaccine complications were highlighted by the recent alert issued by the Norwegian health agency [5].

It's hard to be Cassandra [6]

The disturbing development of the epidemic observed since vaccination according to data published by WHO had led me to sound the alarm [7], widely criticized in the media and quickly drowned in a slew of articles touting the success of this vaccination based on antibody levels or the favourable evolution of small groups. And these journalists did not seem to be interested in the evolution of the epidemic on the entire population. However, a vaccination campaign aims to prevent the transmission of the disease and reduce mortality in the population. These two criteria are the only relevant ones.

Since vaccination, according to the WHO [8], daily incidence and mortality have soared with the incidence of new cases from 2792 on 20 December to 4924 on 25 January and daily mortality from 18 on 20 December to 69 on 26/1, setting the absolute monthly record (more than 1000 deaths in one month [9]) and daily (69) since the beginning of the epidemic.

Why are the media always quick to release press releases from the communications services of the firms no longer interested in the objective facts published by WHO? Do they censor themselves spontaneously or do they give in to external pressure?

It is true that vaccination is solely responsible for this outbreak of the disease. For the time being, this is only a temporal correlation, but a strong alarm.

After reviewing the FDA file, Peter Doshi, the University of Maryland's Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Officer, estimated that "actual efficacy is much lower than that stated to date, well below the 50% efficacy threshold set by regulatory authorities for approval."

However, the risk of such an outbreak after the first injection of the Pfizer vaccine was precisely underlined by a press release from the Academy of Medicine on 11 January [11]:

"In the current context of epidemic resurgence, it is the persistence of a low or insufficient immunity rate in the extra weeks prior to the second injection that must be taken into account. The individual risk of aggravation by "facilitating antibodies" should be raised when infection occurs in a person with low levels of neutralizing antibodies."

The same press release also drew attention to the risk of favouring variants:

"At the collective level, obtaining expanded immunization coverage, but weakened by a low level of immunity, provides a favourable ground for selecting the emergence of one or more variants beyond vaccination-induced immunity."

We sincerely hope that the fears of this considerable escalation of the epidemic since vaccination do not herald a vaccine catastrophe and that after the second injection, things will improve for our Israeli friends by the shift in the curves of contamination and mortality.

But this case shows that it is dangerous to play the sorcerer's apprentices and to accelerate marketing at the expense of health security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And here is more propaganda:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/medical/two-pfizer-doses-prevent-almost-all-covid-19-cases-israeli-research/ar-BB1dbv19?ocid=msedgntp

Meanwhile in neighbouring Egypt there is no Covid crisis.And it is one of the dirtiest countries in the world ( I have lived there)

[ExomatrixTV]

The Covid-19 Genocide (https://newtube.app/TrueTube/2ocfxrR) of 2020 (and beyond)

[Lunesoleil]

I8fS6BiJDYU
General Robert Spalding: USA, elections, China and the pandemic ... A free world?

Speak in English and French translation

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 29th January 2021


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FSuzIcxDKI

[Philippe]

Looks like even vastly under-reported govt figures are showing a lot of deaths from the mRNA vaccines:

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/181-dead-in-the-u-s-during-2-week-period-from-experimental-covid-injections-how-long-will-we-continue-to-allow-mass-murder-by-lethal-injection/

Very disturbing section about Donald Trump. What do we expect? They have all been educated in the materialistic corrupt science of this planet and all major countries in the world are now fighting for survival with the manna and profits from the vaccine business. Lift your spirits above this mess.

[eyeland]

An informative presentation about Ivermectin from Dr Pierre Kory:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/media/flccc-lecture-for-ypo-gold-on-ivermectin/

[Tintin]

In the year [since then], Thailand has recorded an overall death toll from Covid of 72. Not 72,000, but 72, from a population slightly larger than the UK’s. To put that in perspective, more Thais die on the roads each day than have succumbed to Covid in all of the past 12 months.
-----------------

Lockdown Sceptics reader Rick Bradford has written to us from Thailand, where despite a super-low death toll the country is in the grip of Covid hysteria.

Postcard From Bangkok

Source: Lockdown Skeptics (https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/01/27/#postcard-from-bangkok)
Published January 27th, 2021

https://www.trailsofindochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Bangkok_header.jpg

At first glance, there are many similarities between the progress of the Covid pandemic in Thailand and in the UK. Grim-faced ministers, surrounded by medical experts dressed in white lab coats to indicate authority and competence, appear on TV and announce a raft of restrictions on travel, restaurants, alcohol sales, beaches, markets and entertainment venues, the severity of which rely almost entirely on the number of new positive Covid tests recorded the previous day. The strategy is inconsistent and incoherent, and subject to reversal at whim.

There is a familiar sense of hapless Government apparatchiks, bewildered by having to work with numbers, and relying on a motley selection of self-styled experts who also don’t know what is going on. The mantra of “We must do something, this is something, therefore we must do it” is heard as loud in Bangkok as it is in London. The Thai population, like the British, has been scared into regarding COVID-19 as something akin to the Black Death.

But there is one glaring difference between the situation in Thailand and that in the UK. Thailand, with a steady influx of Chinese tourists, was one of the first countries to see infections caused by COVID-19, in January last year.

In the year since then, Thailand has recorded an overall death toll from Covid of 72. Not 72,000, but 72, from a population slightly larger than the UK’s. To put that in perspective, more Thais die on the roads each day than have succumbed to Covid in all of the past 12 months. In fact, all-cause mortality in Thailand in 2020 was expected to be greatly reduced as travel restrictions dented the normal carnage on Thai roads, which claims over 25,000 lives a year. In fact, all-cause mortality in Thailand in 2020 was expected to be greatly reduced as travel restrictions dented the normal carnage on Thai roads, which claims over 25,000 lives a year.

Covid, for some reason, has not caught on in Thailand. This is not to suggest that the Thai government is somehow more than 1,000 times more efficient than the UK Government.

There are many factors at play. Thais are drenched every day in vitamin D from a relentless sun, the temperature rarely drops below 20 Celsius and is usually in the mid-30s, plus the population is younger than the UK’s, especially regarding the highly vulnerable geriatric category. There is also a much lower prevalence of obesity and Type-2 diabetes. This apparent high level of metabolic health occurs while Thailand spends £180 per person per year on its health system, almost 20 times less than the UK (£3,200). Thais may also benefit from a higher degree of prior immunity owing to earlier similar outbreaks, such as the SARS outbreak of 2003 which was quite localised to Asia.

So the impact of Covid on Thailand has been almost entirely economic. The tourist industry, which in 2019 comprised over 10% of Thailand’s economy, has been shredded. Several million Thai workers have lost their jobs, and familiar tourist haunts such as Pattaya and Koh Samui are ghost towns, unlikely to fully recover.

But the Government seems undeterred by the loss of perhaps £36 billion in annual tourism revenue and is pushing ahead with grandiose redevelopment plans, such as the expansion of the main international airport (which has lain empty for one year), a high-speed rail network which nobody can afford to take, and most ambitious of all, a space programme with an aim to travel to the moon within the next seven years.

Given the chronic problems besetting Thailand’s economy, it is not surprising that many commentators have expressed a preference that Thailand’s first visitor to the moon should be General Prayut Chan-ocha, Prime Minister, and holder of the Knight Grand Cordon (Special Class) of The Most Exalted Order of the White Elephant.

It seems fair to conclude that there is little point in comparing the death toll between different countries and drawing conclusions from the data. Both the UK and Thailand have incompetent governments which have trashed their respective economies for no apparent good reason.

Whether their interventions and restrictions have had any impact on the trajectory of the Covid pandemic in their countries is something that will no doubt be debated for many years.

[greybeard]

Court Declares Regional LOCKDOWN UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ‘Catastrophically wrong’

https://new.awakeningchannel.com/german-court-declares-regional-lockdown-unconstitutional-catastrophically-wrong/

[Baby Steps]

STATISTICAL BOONDOGGLES

In the UK it has been officially announced that when they say - 'A Covid Death' they are now including Flu deaths plus anybody who dies UP TO 60 DAYS after a positive covid test.

There is a valid argument that says that it is impossible to say 'Died from Covid' for many, because a Covid infection can aggravate life threatening conditions without acting immediately, so in many cases it is a contributory factor to an un quantifiable extent.

In general in the UK, and this may differ from countries with commercially driven medical systems, there are not any financial incentives to categorise a death as 'Covid related'.

What we do see in the UK is a kind of creeping triage practise whereby if you are old, and there is a suspicion of a Covid infection, you are placed to the back of the line for treatment. If you call an ambulance it is healthier to say that you have not ever experienced symptoms of Covid, or met anybody so afflicted, ever.

Most intelligent people are saying that in such circumstances it is quite hard to measure the impact of this virus and therefore the best way to measure this is to look at EXCESS DEATHS.

Where they are going wrong is they then say - look at the excess deaths caused by the virus! In other words they attribute ALL excess deaths to the virus. We are now at the time when the 2020 excess death figures are starting to come out. They show a peak in March/April, and a small blip in December.

The error being made will be that commentators and politicians will point at the graph, and use it as a key data point supporting policy.

This is a mis-use or over simplification of the situation.

The following are likely major contributors to the deaths that we are seeing, and in my opinion, until they have been quantified statistically, any talk of 'excess deaths due to covid' is misleading. (also of course note that no quantification efforts will be made, as they do not support the narrative.)

1. During lock-down and afterwards, there has been severe disruption to the normal operations of the health system. Many cancelled consultations, scans, and operations. Also many people just did not go to Doctors or casualty out of fear or caution. This HAS to be a major factor.

2. The effects of lock down include family stress, mental illness & depression including suicide, economic catastrophe for many, which is clearly linked to survival or otherwise, and sedentary, indulgent lifestyle changes which are known to be unhealthy.

3. The Care Home mass casualty event in March/April. In common with the UK, some states in the US adopted a policy of shunting aged covid cases into Care Homes. This environment provided much lower levels of care, and due to staff lack of PPE and a lower level of infection control knowledge it is beyond dispute that many died there as a result. Infections raged through the care homes. Condolences to SO MANY who lost loved ones. In the UK there is the suspicion that things were even worse - I have heard accounts that suggest that the care regime or 'Care Pathway' was deliberately trying to kill them.

4. Deliberate sabotage of the PCR test. This is my own theory. We know that current advice on how many magnification cycles is appropriate has been changed. They are winding down the cycle number to reduce the number of false positives. There is therefore the suspicion that there have been many false positives in the past. These are described as 'asymptomatic cases'. The problem with this is that if we cannot correctly identify infected people, how can we target them with therapies and/or isolate them? The answer is that we cannot, so a targeted response has been impossible. This may have been a factor in some deaths.

5. The vaccine roll out is causing deaths, that are being passed off as Covid deaths most likely. They are prioritising care homes currently, then we are hearing about break-outs of the virus in homes post vaccination.mmmm. Of course a new and imperfect at best vaccine is a shock to the system of the aged. Often they are doing the flu vax at the same time.

[Ernie Nemeth]

I was just figuring out, based on the most reliable data, how many extra deaths has been attributed to the covid count in the USA.

I estimate it at about 50%! It should be around 200,000, not 400,000.

[uzn]

Court Declares Regional LOCKDOWN UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ‘Catastrophically wrong’

https://new.awakeningchannel.com/german-court-declares-regional-lockdown-unconstitutional-catastrophically-wrong/

Here more about that:

Weimar has shown how the judiciary can and must work, explains the German lawyer and co-founder of the Corona Committee Foundation, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. The judge of the local court did exactly what would have been the task of the German Bundestag in spring 2020, namely to check facts. He explained in detail that the epidemic situation of national importance as decided by the Bundestag and its core, the threat of overloading the health system, never existed. For this reason, all measures are both unlawful and unconstitutional and therefore void.

Excerpts from the judgment

The judgment of the Weimar District Court on January 11, 2021, file number 6OWi-523 Js 202518/20, was preceded by a birthday party in April 2020, which was ended by the police. She saw this as a violation of the "Thuringian Ordinance on Measures Required to Curb the Spread of the Corona Virus SARS-CoV-2" and imposed fines. One of the party guests then sued and was acquitted. Those interested can read the full verdict here:
https://www.wochenblick.at/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Freispruch_wg_Kontaktbeschra%CC%88nkung_2021_01_11_AG_Weimar_Beschluss.pdf

RN 21:
"There was no 'epidemic of national importance' (...), although the Bundestag has determined this with effect from March 28, 2020."

RN29:
"The horror scenarios that significantly influenced the decisions about the lockdown in the spring (...) were also based on incorrect assumptions about the lethality of the virus (so-called infection fatality rate = IFR) and the question of an existing or missing basic immunity against the virus the population."

RN 31:
"The general ban on contact or the ban on gathering (...) is unconstitutional for material reasons, because it violates the human dignity guaranteed in (...) as inviolable."

RN 33:
“A general ban on contact is a serious interference with civil rights. One of the fundamental freedoms of human beings in a free society is that they can determine for themselves which people (provided they are willing) and under which circumstances they come into contact. The free encounter of people with one another for the most varied of purposes is at the same time the elementary basis of society. In principle, the state has to refrain from any targeted regulatory and restrictive intervention. The question of how many people a citizen invites to his home or how many people a citizen meets in public places to go for a walk, play sports, go shopping or sit on a park bench does not interest the state . "

RN 34:
“Even in the risk analysis` Pandemic by Virus Modi-SARS` (...), which described a scenario with 7.5 million deaths, a general ban on contact (as well as curfews and the extensive shutdown of public life) is not considered. "

RN36:
“In addition, and as a separate aspect, it should be noted that the state, with the general ban on contact for the purpose of infection protection, treats every citizen as a potential threat to the health of third parties. If every citizen is viewed as a threat from whom others must be protected, he is at the same time deprived of the opportunity to decide what risks he exposes himself, which represents a fundamental freedom.

RN49:
"From the data from the Robert Koch Institute, the legislator was able to see that there was no evidence of the effectiveness of the lockdown that was decided on March 22nd, ..."

RN78:
Having said that, there can be no doubt that the number of deaths attributable to lockdown policy measures alone is many times that of deaths prevented by lockdown. For this reason alone, the standards to be assessed here do not meet the requirement of proportionality. Added to this are the direct and indirect restrictions of freedom, the gigantic financial damage, the immense damage to health and the ideal. The word 'disproportionate' is too colorless to even suggest the dimensions of what is happening. "

[uzn]

Here is a Telegram Channel where we germans share pictures and movies of areas in the world were people live normally and enjoy their live. To remind us how it was and should be again.
It´s called Freiheitsbeweise = proof of freedom
https://t.me/freiheitsbeweise

[Baby Steps]

Dr Lee Merritt lays out very succinctly :

- why she thinks the virus is a bio weapon
- the dynamics of coronavirus spread as a delivery system
- organized suppression of cheap therapeutics
- the importance of anti microbials
- indonesian research suggesting that vitamin d status is the biggest factor determining whether infection leads to a severe case


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mPIomjWwd4&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR22od4OKzwKdjCDVYN1P-i-6N0J6vtMhx0fyKQxFrl5lCIh-bZoFqqdzAo