Covid19: Cui Bono? What's the real agenda?

[norman]

That chart above says it all.

Yes, there is a virus.

Yes, they are fiddling the figures.

Did they always intend to fiddle the figures or are they forced to, because the virus isn't as deadly as they hoped it would be ?

[Ratszinger]

Facts to ponder. 
1  China and Europe are both economic-adversaries to the USA and Trump was kicking their asses, hard!
2 How to stop or slow the USA to level the playing field? Inject virus
3 Immediately drops economy of the world to all the same,   a) meets begin phase destruction of religion   b) reduces population numbers   c) establish political control over masses   d) deflate bubble FED created   e) elimination of all the geo-economic competition 

[Ernie Nemeth]

This is how empires fall. If it is not a disease, it is another power, over- stripping the land's ability to provide, lack of energy, lack of innovation, or some other disaster.

An empire has a lot of mouths to feed, including their war machines. If one understands the relationship between exploited workers and the fleecing of their sweat equity, it would be apparent that empires cannot be funded indefinitely unless the workers are willing to sacrifice more and more as the empire grows. This leads to insurgency and turmoil and has been the downfall of many empires in the past.

You can only hold so many slaves before they turn on you...

[Ernie Nemeth]

This leads to the great cull of humanity as the only response likely to keep the war-mongers in power. This fiat system...fiat money, fiat science, fiat medicine, fiat society...is an odd way to run a world. It can only work with marginally intelligent members and herd mentality because it is FAKE!

Learn your basics or reap the harvest of your ignorance!

[Gwin Ru]

Bumping the following:



xe9MNQnSY6I

See these posts:


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1348254&viewfull=1#post1348254

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1348498&viewfull=1#post1348498


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1348500&viewfull=1#post1348500


... so... we can scream hoax, fake, etc... the reality is that most of the world is in lockdown with assorted legislations passed, etc... THEY managed to get their end products on a fake pandemic, probably because they got tired of waiting for a real one to come out of their bio-warfare labs from around the world... and the top-down control structure goes from the top dog down to one's neighbor... heavy sigh...

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

This been posted yet? Heads up on this one;

Removed from youtube: Russian Colonel explains the Coronavirus Depopulation agenda.

Speaking on film is the former Colonel of Military Intelligence Service for Russia (GRU) Vladimir Kvachkov from March 25, 2020. This ex-Intelligence officer accurately and poignantly explains the farce of a pandemic which is the Coronavirus.

11mins (cannot seem to embed)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nB0R1fg87TIu/

[shaberon]

Facts to ponder. 
1  China and Europe are both economic-adversaries to the USA and Trump was kicking their asses, hard!
 

In a political sense, maybe, but in terms of real economy, I do not believe it, I am pretty sure that the overall population is mainly interested in a peaceful trading system.

The Chinese economy is heavily reliant on the American and European, those are their biggest export markets.

They are not necessarily interested in the political or "petrodollar" aspects, and so in terms of systems, there definitely are alternatives and rivals, while the actual petrodollar was probably always expendable or a planned disposal, which has entered its hour of ejection. Many countries are reducing their U. S. Treasuries and the recent...crisis...caused a lot of investment to "go home" from the U. S. back to China or wherever.

What we thought was the U. S. economy was something to be slowly nibbled by Israel and then liquidated.

This system was originally installed because Germany was an economic adversary of Britain--see WW I, II--and in this strategy, the main, most important thing, is that Germany can never make amends with Russia. Originally, confinement of Russia was driven because Britain was standing all over India. Well, India enjoyed around two hundred years usually referred to as "rape" and after half the world's wealth was sucked from it, ok, they are let go and get their own flag with boundaries that are designed to enflame religious discord. Doesn't matter--there was a new cash cow via Federal Reserve. Israel appears, and now, the U. S. is no longer so high-performing as a host or is not really going to take over the whole world and enforce its writ through various agencies. Its real economy has already been shifted back to agriculture instead of industrialization, and so maybe we should try to figure out how fair distribution of food works.

It seems to me the really big "chomp" on America is happening, but, it did not get accompanied by the other parts about subjugating the Mid-east, Germany, and so on...and in this sense, it is much like a mono-polar fiat system starting to corrode.

True, Trump and others are probably more interested in "pro-USA" stuff than discarding the country like an old husk, but this is not likely to affect much.

If it doesn't disappear, and winds up being willing to go fairly on a level playing field, then it will probably be as fine as it can be. There just probably isn't much future in "USA #1" or "international oligarchy in a disguise of USA #1". Of course they will try, but it looks like the rest of the world is truly outpacing them.

[Sunny]

A CORONAVIRUS DRUG SEEMS TO WORK

News that an experimental drug seems to be the first effective treatment for the new coronavirus has unleashed a flurry of interest – and a clamor to know how soon it might be available.

Talk turned Friday to how quickly the federal Food and Drug Administration might act on Gilead Sciences’s remdesivir after preliminary results from a major study found it shortened the recovery time by an average of four days for people hospitalized with COVID-19.

“You do now have a drug that you have proven can actually work on the virus,” the National Institutes of Health’s Dr. Anthony Fauci told The Associated Press.

“Will it be an overwhelming cure? No, of course not,” Fauci said. But with its use, “you will free up hospital beds, you will take less stress on the health care system.”

No drug currently is approved for treating the virus, which has killed more than 230,000 people worldwide since it emerged late last year.

When independent experts monitoring the study called with the news that the drug was working, study leader Dr. Andre Kalil of the University of Nebraska said he was “almost speechless” with joy.

Here are some questions about the results and next steps.

Q: How much does the drug help?

A: Remdesivir reduced the time patients were in the hospital by 31% to 11 days on average versus 15 days for those just given usual care, preliminary results of the study found.

The drug also might be reducing deaths, although that’s not certain from the partial results revealed so far.

About 8% of those on the drug died versus 11.6% of the comparison group, but the difference is not large enough for scientists to say for sure that the drug was the reason.

Q: What about folks with milder illness?

A: Remdesivir so far has only been tested in people with moderate to severe illness who were hospitalized and got it through an IV.

Even among those in the study there was “a very big span of illness,” from people just needing a little extra oxygen to those requiring breathing machines, said Dr. Elizabeth Hohmann, who enrolled 49 patients in the study at Massachusetts General Hospital.

“We need more information to see how best to use it going forward” and which types of patients get the most benefit, she said.

Q: When will it be available and for whom?

A: The drug is not yet approved anywhere in the world for any use. The FDA could make it immediately available through an “emergency use authorization,” which speeds experimental drugs, tests and other medical products to patients during public health crises. Under the authorization, the agency can waive the usually rigorous standards necessary for drug approval and instead approve drugs whose potential benefits outweigh their risks.

The FDA has already done that for hydroxychloroquine, a malaria drug President Donald Trump has touted for COVID-19, despite no clear evidence it works.

Fauci said on NBC’s “Today” show Thursday morning that he expects remdesivir to get emergency use approval “really quickly,” and that he spoke with FDA commissioner Stephen Hahn about it Thursday evening.

Q: How much remdesivir is there and what will it cost?

A: Gilead has or is close to having 140,000 treatment courses now and will donate them, Chairman Daniel O’Day said in a letter to the public Wednesday night. The company aims to have made a total of 500,000 treatment courses by October and more than 1 million by December.

Gilead’s own testing, also revealed on Thursday, suggests that five days of treatment are as good as 10, so the estimates of how many people can be treated with the available supply likely can be doubled, he added.

Q: How might having a treatment affect the impact of the pandemic?

A: Having to spend less time in the hospital reduces the risk patients will develop complications, such as other infections, or spread the virus to health care workers, Kalil said.

Those benefits extend not just to the patients who receive the drug but to others as well, said Dr. Aneesh Mehta, who enrolled 103 patients on the study at Emory and other Atlanta hospitals

“We create more availability in our hospitals,” and can take care of more patients with other medical problems, including those who have been forced to delay surgeries for cancer, bad hearts and other maladies, Mehta said.

Q: What about other drugs in testing?

A: Remdesivir will become the standard of care and any other potential treatments will now have to be tested against or in combination with it, Fauci said.

He recalled AZT, the first drug shown to help people with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. That drug by itself proved not terribly strong, but it led to a host of others being developed and the notion of combination treatments that are used now for HIV, tuberculosis and other diseases.

Dr. Max Parmar, director of the clinical trials unit at University College London, said it was likely remdesivir would need to be combined with other treatments to more successfully treat COVID-19. The study “suggests remdesivir could be the backbone of treatment, but other drugs may be needed,” he said.

Q: Will having a treatment cause people to ease up on social distancing and other measures meant to limit the spread?

A: “I hope not,” Fauci said. “This is not a knockout punch. This is not a cure.”

Source: AP News

1 May 2020

[onawah]

7 Billion Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine for World’s Population of 7 Billion – Was This the Plan All Along?
May 3, 2020
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/7-billion-doses-of-covid-19-vaccine-for-worlds-population-of-7-billion-was-this-the-plan-all-along/

"by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The COVID-19 pandemic has created an instant market for vaccine development. Around $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer funds have already been given to Big Pharma to develop the much coveted COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, a new class of vaccines that have never before been successfully developed. ($450 million to Johnson & Johnson in March, and $483 million to Moderna Therapeutics in April.)

At least another $2 billion is being spent by the Bill Gates-founded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

And this is all just for starters, as over 100 COVID-19 vaccines are currently in development by most of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. The CARES Act signed into law on Mar. 27, 2020 allocates $27 billion for COVID-19 vaccine development, just in the U.S. alone.

And if that wasn’t enough, earlier this week (May, 2020) President Trump seemingly gave a blank check to spend as much as possible to fast track a COVID-19 vaccine through “Operation Warp Speed,” a coalition of scientists, government officials, military agencies, and private companies led by Alex Azar, the Health and Human Services Secretary, and Mark Esper, the Defense Secretary.

Their goal: to deliver 300 million doses of coronavirus vaccine from November to December 2020 and another 300 million by January 2021. (Source.)

So just by starting to research a COVID-19 vaccine, the already lucrative pharmaceutical industry just became the all-time most profitable industry on the planet.

As pharmaceutical companies compete with each other to get a COVID-19 vaccine to market, there was initial skepticism that an mRNA vaccine could be developed anytime soon. Projections were that it would take about 5 years, and even then only with a small chance of success. See:

Medical Analytics Firm: COVID19 Vaccine to Take 5.2 Years to Develop with 5% Chance of Success
Now, as we saw earlier this week with the announcement of the new “Operation Warp Speed” project, the projections are to produce enough vaccines to be able to inject all 350 million citizens of the United States by the end of 2020.

And on May 1st this week Moderna Therapeutics announced a partnership with Lonza manufacturing to start producing 1 billion COVID-19 vaccines a year.

Moderna Therapeutics is partnering with Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), who also has close ties to Bill Gates.

Bill Gates said in an interview this week that 7 billion vaccine doses are needed to end the COVID-19 pandemic, which is about the number of people currently living on the planet.

Will the entire world’s population just volunteer to get this vaccine, or are the drug companies counting on the fact that they will become mandatory?

The world’s largest manufacturer of vaccines, the Serum Institute of India, which produces 1.5 billion vaccine doses a year for an array of diseases, said it was not going to wait for approval of a COVID-19 vaccine, but would start manufacturing them immediately, starting with 40 million doses. They are currently working with the the Oxford Vaccine Group. (Source.)

It would seem that pharmaceutical companies manufacturing a COVID-19 vaccine are banking on the fact that the World Health Organization will recommend that they be mandatory.

Will the U.S. comply?

Is President Trump is the Key to Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S.?
There are good reasons why vaccine industry insiders balked at the idea of developing an mRNA vaccine so quickly initially. They have tried to develop them in the past, with dismal results. They were unsuccessful in trying to develop this kind of vaccine for other coronaviruses, like SARS and MERS.

Dr. Fauci and the NIH, working together with Bill Gates, also previously had dismal results in developing this kind of vaccine for HIV/AIDS.

But all of that has now changed with the world-wide “pandemic” of COVID-19.

President Trump can now eliminate safety tests normally required for FDA approval of drugs and vaccines, by invoking the “Emergency Use Authorization” authority which “allows FDA to help strengthen the nation’s public health protections against CBRN threats by facilitating the availability and use of MCMs needed during public health emergencies.”

According to the FDA website:

Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the FDA Commissioner may allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

Section 564 of the FD&C Act was amended by the Project Bioshield Act of 2004 and was further amended by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, and Public Law 115-92 of 2017.

President Trump invoked this authority this week (May, 2020) in directing the FDA to approve the anti-viral drug remdesivir, which was previously abandoned as a treatment for Ebola.

“I’m pleased to announce that Gilead now has a EUA (emergency use authorization) from the FDA for remdesivir — and you know what that is, because that’s been the hot thing also in the papers and in the media for the last little while,” the president said.

FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn confirmed the authorization “was issued today.” (Source.)

This is like a dream come true for pharmaceutical companies. A pandemic allows them to secure government funds to research new drugs.

It allows them to bypass normal FDA safety testing with legal immunity should things go wrong and people are injured or die from the side effects.

Then the government, who paid for the research and development, ends up spending more of your taxpayer funds to purchase these vaccines through the CDC, and then requires the American population to receive them, while selling the excess vaccines produced that the American public does not use to the World Health Organization to be mandated upon citizens of other countries.

With the announcement earlier this week that Moderna Therapeutics has developed a partnership with Lonza manufacturing to start producing 1 billion COVID-19 vaccines a year, it would seem that they are the leading candidate at this point to benefit the most, especially since they are working in partnership with Dr. Anthony Fauci, a member of President Trump’s Coronavirus task force team.

The Moderna – Lonza partnership was huge news this week, as Fauci said back in February that even if they had a vaccine that would work, it would be difficult to produce so many so quickly:

Production would require an amount of time that’s as “problematic” as developing the shot itself, Fauci said. (Source.)

Fauci also allegedly stated that once Moderna reached phase 2 testing of the vaccine, that it would be tested in China, suggesting that he is still working closely with the World Health Organization, and looking at supplying his COVID-19 vaccine to the entire world. (Source.)

Do you want to be required to receive an experimental COVID-19 vaccine that has been fast-tracked and where the drug companies have no risk or liability should anything go wrong?

If not, President Trump is the probably the only one who can stop this, and it is time that the American public let’s him know that we will not comply."

See Also:

Bill Gates’ Plan to use Microneedles to Deliver COVID19 Vaccine and Embed Vaccination Status into the Skin
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/bill-gates-plan-to-use-microneedles-to-deliver-covid19-vaccine-and-embed-vaccination-status-into-the-skin/
COVID19 Vaccine Makers Using Aborted Fetal Cells
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/covid19-vaccine-makers-using-aborted-fetal-cells/

[Gwin Ru]

A CORONAVIRUS DRUG SEEMS TO WORK

News that an experimental drug seems to be the first effective treatment for the new coronavirus has unleashed a flurry of interest – and a clamor to know how soon it might be available.

[...]

Source: AP News

1 May 2020See this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110505-Covid19-Global-reports-news-and-updates&p=1354501&viewfull=1#post1354501)

[greybeard]

A drug that works on what?
They havent got an effective accurate test yet.
Chris

[Anka]

I mean the rusty souls who directed the entire theater of pretense with this virus, in my opinion a big fiasco, too.
What I can say today about those who plot and will not succeed in interrupting an entire life cycle coordinated by the entire Universe, is just a kind of poem written by a Romanian author.


"Babylon

the true tragedy of contemporary man
it is the discrediting of the tragic by indifference
genuine as well
it is the combination of need and inadequacy
always omnipotent solution
is virulence
in the equation of determinism
valence
creates non-values
treasure hunters
discovers incompetence

the infallible certainty of their rusty souls
it is the collection of unread dreams
the prelude is to save an inert world
only the dead are certain
and hurried

incoherent
the man struggles in quaternary anguish
the evolution on the degradation scale is inherent
relativity surrounds us
only decay is the pressing solution

we contemplate our perfection
in opaque mirrors
in the race of life
the crowd indulges

we climb on top of illusions
we walk on mud steps
we lose our lives in confusion
we forgot
how to die heroes

and only leaves remained
and undead "

It's the first and last time I write here anyway, but..

We have to be careful.
Stay well and safe.:heart:
:focus:

[Tintin]

Perhaps this should best be placed in the 'news' section but it's relevant overall to the data collection aspect to an overall agenda.

***

Ahead of a contract tracing application due to be trialed in the Isle of Wight, UK, tomorrow Matrix Chambers (https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/news/legal-advice-on-smartphone-contact-tracing-published/) have produced some very important legal guidance.

From their website, here (https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/news/legal-advice-on-smartphone-contact-tracing-published/).



Matthew Ryder QC and Edward Craven from Matrix, along with Ravi Naik solicitor and legal director AWO, a new data rights agency, and Gayatri Sarathy of Blackstone chambers, have been instructed by Open Society Foundation to provide a detailed legal opinion on smartphone contact tracing and other data driven proposals that are part of the Government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Their opinion and recommendations can be downloaded here (https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Covid-19-tech-responses-opinion-30-April-2020.pdf).

Its conclusions include the following:

1. A de-centralised smartphone contact tracing system – the type contemplated by “DP-3T” and being considered by governments across Europe and also Apple and Google – would be likely to comply with both human rights and data protection laws. In contrast, a centralised smartphone system – which is the current UK Government proposal – is a greater interference with fundamental rights and would require significantly greater justification to be lawful. That justification has not yet been forthcoming.

2. The UK Government’s announcements in March and April for sharing health data between the private and public sector appear to be flawed. This means such data sharing is potentially not in compliance with legal requirements. Further information needs to be provided to ensure compliance and a data impact assessment should be conducted and made public.

3. Any attempt to introduce ‘immunity passports’ would be a dramatic measure, both socially and legally. It would need a clear scientific basis and would also have to address the significant impact on fundamental rights including the risk of indirect discrimination.

PDF here: https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Covid-19-tech-responses-opinion-30-April-2020.pdf

[Gwin Ru]

How Psychopath John Rockefeller Wiped-Out Natural Cures to Create Big Pharma (https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/how-psychopath-john-rockefeller-wiped-out-natural-cures-to-create-big-pharma/?utm_campaign=steempress&utm=dailybrief)

Fort-Russ-News Anglo 5 (https://www.fort-russ.com/category/anglo-5/)Headline News (https://www.fort-russ.com/category/headline-news/)Opinions (https://www.fort-russ.com/category/opinions/)
By Chris Kanthan – May 3, 2020 –
By (https://www.fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)Guest Author (https://www.fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)
Last updated May 4, 2020


https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/rockefeller-created-big-pharma-31318-800x445-1-750x430.jpg



You thought Big Oil was bad, but the Rockefeller Family also set the stage for Big Pharma destroying Natural Cures in the process. Author, Chris Kanthan, has written an amazing article on how the Rockefeller family undermined modern society in countless ways, but what most do not realize is just how much they wiped out natural cures. The family name has now been linked to the suppression of natural medicine to found big pharmaceutical companies and make big money.

Here’s what Chris wrote for World Affairs (https://worldaffairs.blog/2015/10/20/how-rockefeller-founded-modern-medicine-and-killed-natural-cures/):

People these days look at you like a weirdo if you talk about the healing properties of plants or any other holistic practices. Much like anything else, there is a lot of politics and money behind our modern medical system.

It all starts with John D. Rockefeller (1839 – 1937) who was an oil magnate, a robber baron, America’s first billionaire, and a natural-born monopolist.

By the turn on the 20th century, he controlled 90% of all oil refineries in the U.S. through his oil company, Standard Oil, which was later on broken up to become Chevron, Exxon, Mobil etc.


https://truthandsatire.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/rockefeller-standard-oil.jpg?w=620


At the same time, around 1900, scientists discovered “petrochemicals” and the ability to create all kinds of chemicals from oil. For example, the first plastic — called Bakelite (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakelite) — was made from oil in 1907. Scientists were discovering various vitamins and guessed that many pharmaceutical drugs could be made from oil.

This was a wonderful opportunity for Rockefeller who saw the ability to monopolize the oil, chemical and the medical industries at the same time!

The best thing about petrochemicals was that everything could be patented and sold for high profits.

But there was one problem with Rockefeller’s plan for the medical industry: natural/herbal medicines were very popular in America at that time. Almost half the doctors and medical colleges in the U.S. were practicing holistic medicine, using knowledge from Europe and Native Americans.

Rockefeller, the monopolist, had to figure out a way to get rid of his biggest competition. So he used the classic strategy of “problem-reaction-solution.” That is, create a problem and scare people, and then offer a (pre-planned) solution. (Similar to terrorism scare, followed by the “Patriot Act”).

He went to his buddy Andrew Carnegie – another plutocrat who made his money from monopolizing the steel industry (http://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/hammer-antitrust.asp) – who devised a scheme. From the prestigious Carnegie Foundation, they sent a man named Abraham Flexner to travel around the country and report on the status of medical colleges and hospitals around the country.

This led to the Flexner Report (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report), which gave birth to the modern medicine as we know it.

Needless to say, the report talked about the need for revamping and centralizing our medical institutions. Based on this report, more than half of all medical colleges were soon closed.

Homeopathy and natural medicines were mocked and demonized; and doctors were even jailed.

To help with the transition and change the minds of other doctors and scientists, Rockefeller gave more than $100 million to colleges, hospitals and founded a philanthropic front group called “General Education Board” (GEB). This is the classic carrot and stick approach.

In a very short time, medical colleges were all streamlined and homogenized. All the students were learning the same thing, and medicine was all about using patented drugs.

Scientists received huge grants to study how plants cured diseases, but their goal was to first identify which chemicals in the plant were effective, and then recreate a similar chemical – but not identical – in the lab that could be patented.

A pill for an ill became the mantra for modern medicine.

And you thought Koch brothers were evil?

So, now we are, 100 years later, churning out doctors who know nothing about the benefits of nutrition or herbs or any holistic practices. We have an entire society that is enslaved to corporations for its well-being.

America spends 15% of its GDP on healthcare, which should be really called “sick care.” It is focused not on cure, but only on symptoms, thus creating repeat customers. There is no cure for cancer, diabetes, autism, asthma, or even flu.

Why would there be real cures? This is a system founded by oligarchs and plutocrats, not by doctors.

As for cancer, oh yeah, the American Cancer Society (http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/almanac/medicine_and_health/1913_american_cancer_society)was founded by none other than Rockefeller in 1913.

In this month of breast cancer awareness, it is sad to see people being brainwashed about chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. That’s for another blog post … but here is a quote from John D. Rockefeller that summarizes his vision for America…


https://truthandsatire.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/no-thinkers.jpg

Source: World Affairs
----------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone still wondering why MSM demonizes, unsubscribes, deplatforms, etc... anything that's not making any profits for fatpharma?

[onawah]

Ferguson used old failed model to predict COVID deaths
by Jon Rappoport
May 3, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/04/professor-neil-ferguson-and-the-idiot-presidents/

"Professor Neil Ferguson, and the idiot presidents and prime ministers who believe his computer predictions .

Buying, for the moment, the official story about the “pandemic,” there were two basic choices:

Let people go about their lives and develop, through contact, natural immunity to the disease; or imprison populations in their homes.

Why was the second choice made?

This is my second article about Neil Ferguson (first article, here https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/30/the-british-corona-middle-man/)
...the UK professor whose computer model of COVID-19 changed the world and drove that second choice.

Ferguson’s model predicted a worst-case estimate of 510,000 deaths in the UK, and 2.2 million deaths in the US.

At that point, anybody who was anybody stood up and saluted.

Both heads of government, Trump and Johnson, radically changed course. Instead of allowing people to go about their lives and develop natural immunity, they took the lockdown approach, devastating their economies.

Below, I’ll reprint quotes from my first article, exposing Professor Ferguson’s track record of abysmal and destructive failures in predicting the spread of diseases.

This record was available to anyone—including Trump, Fauci, Deborah Birx, Boris Johnson—but of course these important people have no time to read or think.

Apparently, a key White house conversation went something like this:

FAUCI: Mr. President, we have a new report from the UK. A computer model is predicting the spread of the epidemic. There could be 2 million deaths in the US, if we don’t take drastic action. There must be heavy lockdowns. The state governors will have to carry that ball, but your position on this needs to be unequivocal.

TRUMP: Two million deaths. You’re sure?

FAUCI: Yes, sir. Quite sure.

TRUMP: No way out? Except lockdowns?

FAUCI: That’s right.

TRUMP: Well, then. Okay.

The sheer brilliance in the Oval Office that day must have been blinding.

So, first up, let’s take a peek at a recent article from Nature, the venerable British medical journal. April 2, “Special report: The [computer] simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19”:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01003-6

“…it’s natural to wonder how reliable any of the [computer] simulations are. Unfortunately, during a pandemic it is hard to get data — such as on infection rates — against which to judge a model’s projections.”

This is called a clue. Computer models predicting the spread of disease may be an interesting academic exercise, but in the real world, where lives and nations are on the line, THE DATA, on which the projections are based, are elusive. Without accurate data, what do you have? How about opinion, bias, and conjecture?

Nature: “’You can project [via computer models] forwards and then compare against what you get. But the problem is that our surveillance systems are pretty rubbish’, says John Edmunds, who is a modeller at the LSHTM [London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine]. ‘The total numbers of cases reported, is that accurate? No. Accurate anywhere? No’.”

I see. Rubbish. Total number of cases—inaccurate everywhere. Bad data. No data. In other words, the computer models are sophisticated tripe.

Nature: “’Forecasts made during an outbreak are rarely investigated during or after the event for their accuracy, and only recently have forecasters begun to make results, code, models and data available for retrospective analysis,’ Edmunds and his team noted last year in a paper that assessed the performance of forecasts made in a 2014–15 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone. They found that it was possible to reliably predict the epidemic’s course one or two weeks ahead of time, but no longer, because of the inherent uncertainty and lack of knowledge about the outbreak.”

Computer predictions are rarely investigated for accuracy. Can’t make accurate predictions for more than two weeks ahead. Do you suppose Fauci, who has served as a public health dictator since medieval times, is aware of this, but is ignoring it? That’s a rhetorical question, Your Honor. I withdraw it. The answer is obvious.

Finally, Nature provides us with this startling factoid: “The 16 March simulations that the [Neil Ferguson] team ran to inform the UK government’s COVID-19 response used an agent-based model built in 2005 to see what would happen in Thailand if H5N1 avian flu mutated to a version that could spread easily between people.”

That’s like saying, “This year, the driver in the Indianapolis 500 is sitting in a car built 15 years ago. He’s dusted it off and hopes it works and doesn’t crash into the wall.”

You may think this is an unkind comparison, but we know something about that dusty Ferguson 2005 computer model of avian flu. Here is a quote from the Business insider, 4/25:

“…he [Ferguson] was accused of creating panic by overestimating the potential death toll during the 2005 Bird [avian] Flu outbreak. Ferguson estimated 200 million could die. The real number was in the low hundreds.”

THIS is the basic model Ferguson has now used to project deaths from COVID-19.

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

Without further ado, here is the Business Insider, 4/25, reporting Neil Ferguson’s other grotesque prediction failures:
https://www.businessinsider.com/neil-ferguson-transformed-uk-covid-response-oxford-challenge-imperial-model-2020-4
“Michael Thrusfield, a professor of veterinary epidemiology at Edinburgh University, told the paper he had ‘déjà vu’ after reading the [Ferguson] Imperial paper [on COVID], saying Ferguson was responsible for excessive animal culling during the 2001 Foot and Mouth [actually, Mad Cow disease] outbreak.”

“Ferguson warned the government that 150,000 people could die. Six million animals were slaughtered as a precaution, costing the country billions in farming revenue. In the end, 200 people died.”

“In 2009, one of Ferguson’s models predicted 65,000 people could die from the Swine Flu outbreak in the UK — the final figure was below 500.”

Want more? The Business Insider raises the level of shock even higher.

“Ferguson co-founded the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, based at Imperial [College], in 2008. It is the leading body advising national governments on pathogen outbreaks.”

“It gets tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and works with the UK National Health Service, the US Centres for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), and is tasked with supplying the World Health Organization with ‘rapid analysis of urgent infectious disease problems’.”

Getting the picture?

Bill Gates wants a COVID vaccine before planetary lockdowns end. The lockdowns, of course, are already making a wreck of the Earth’s economies.

Bill Gates’ money goes to Ferguson.

Ferguson supplies, to the CDC and WHO, a vastly worthless but frightening computer projection of COVID deaths. Ferguson thus communicates a justification for the Gates global vaccine plan.

The CDC and WHO act, based on what Gates wants, as expressed by Ferguson.

National governments surrender to WHO and CDC. LOCKDOWNS.

What say you, Trump, Johnson, Merkel, Macron, et al? Are you merely clueless idiots, no brighter than some passerby on a street corner who’s handed a sign for a protest, and joins the line, having zero idea what he’s supporting? Are you that stupid, as you point to Ferguson’s farce of a computer model, with eyes glazed?

Are you simply in fear of experts who, on their best day, should be consigned to modelling numbers of cockroaches in motel rooms?

Or are you hostile idiots, who intend to destroy countless lives as economics sink further into ruin, day by day?

P.S. Perhaps you’re thinking, “These governments couldn’t be THAT crazy and stupid and vicious. They couldn’t have acted based on Neil Ferguson’s computer model…”

Business Insider, 4/25: “Ferguson’s team warned Boris Johnson that the quest for ‘herd immunity’ [letting people live their lives out in the open in the UK] could cost 510,000 lives, prompting an abrupt U-turn [massive national lockdown in the UK]…His [Ferguson’s] simulations have been influential in other countries as well, cited by authorities in the US, Germany, and France.”

“On March 23, the UK scrapped ‘herd immunity’ in favor of a suppression strategy, and the country made preparations for weeks of lockdown. Ferguson’s study was responsible.”

“Dr Deborah Birx, coronavirus response coordinator to the Trump administration, told journalists at a March 16 press briefing that the Imperial paper [Ferguson’s computer projection] prompted the CDC’s new advice to work from home and avoid gatherings of 10 or more.”

[onawah]

Dr. Tenpenny: This is The Biggest Scam Ever Perpetrated on The Human Race…
58,599 views•May 2, 2020
Spiro Skouras
54.8K subscribers

"In this explosive interview, Spiro Skouras is joined by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. The two discuss the latest developments regarding the coronavirus situation which was declared a global health pandemic, by the Gates funded World Health Organization, as more information comes to light questioning the need for a global lockdown.

Dr. Tenpenny and Spiro examine and explore, the motives of the global response by governments, global institutions and private interests, as Dr. Tenpenny exposes perhaps the most alarming aspect of the crisis yet!

No, it is not the virus, it is the blank check issued to the vaccine and drug manufacturers, which not only provides unlimited funding, but also provides blanket immunity to Big Pharma for any harm attributed with the treatments produced during the declared emergency, including all drugs and vaccines.

This blanket immunity is provided by the US government under the PREP Act and provides the drug and vaccine manufacturers the 'Ultimate Blank Check' during a declared emergency. As Dr. Tenpenny points out, the vaccine and drug manufacturers have zero incentive to produce a safe product, as the declared emergency not only rolls back regulatory standards and removes them from any and all liability, but it also ensures the government will purchase their products.

This is an unprecedented level of immunity which raises many questions and safety concerns."
M_9bQ_Ri9p0

Reviewed by Alexandra Bruce, Forbidden Knowledge: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/69034-2/?fbclid=IwAR3pHiu4dMLlJFCxOZPae_9mpeAo3TBgAEP4LPVDZPER58ZdLphsALadAzk
"Spiro Skouras is joined by Dr Sherri Tenpenny, physician, author, speaker and publisher of Vaxxter.com to The two assess the lockstep global response to the coronavirus false flag.

With Trump de-funding USAID and UN initiatives like Climate Change and the WHO, plus stopping much of the drug- and human trafficking that used to grease the wheels of the Deep State, the latest gambit seeks to tap the public coffer in the name of a vaccine, which Spiro notes, “not only provides unlimited funding, but also provides blanket legal immunity to Big Pharma for any harm attributed with the treatments produced during the declared emergency, including all drugs and vaccines.

“This blanket immunity is provided by the US government under the PREP Act and provides the drug and vaccine manufacturers the ‘Ultimate Blank Check’ during a declared emergency. As Dr. Tenpenny points out, the vaccine and drug manufacturers have zero incentive to produce a safe product, as the declared emergency not only rolls back regulatory standards and removes them from any and all liability, but it also ensures the government will purchase their products.”

This becomes all the more disturbing with the looming spectre of not just mandatory vaccines but compulsory vaccines. In the UK (Tavistock central), they’re working on a law that would jail individuals who make “anti-vax” posts on social media.

Dr Tenpenny and Spiro discuss the endless ways that the global response to the coronavirus is an epic hoax, from the openly deliberate inflation of deaths being attributed to it to the tests, some of which were reported to be infected and likely giving false positive results.

As Dr Tenpenny says, “When they said, ‘Well, everybody’s got to get tested.’ What are they testing for? If there are 36 known coronaviruses that have been around for six decades – for sixty years, these viruses have been known and been typed and it’s an RNA virus, so each time it goes through somebody…it morphs into a new subtype.

“What are they testing for? Are they testing for the fact that you had coronavirus influenza-like illness 7 years ago and now you have an antibody to that? Is that what they’re finding? Are they are they specifically looking for the SARS-CoV2 antibody? Has it been around long enough for anybody to do that?

“We know there are at least 30 sub-strains of that virus. We keep talking about ‘The Virus’, like there is one. There’s the virus…from the beginning, the Wuhan virus outbreak and whatever it was was different than was happening in Iran; different than what was happening in Italy; different than New York; different than California – and even The New York Times ran an article, I think last week, that said they know there’s at least 30 of subtypes of this family of this particular virus, already…so what are we testing for?

“…if you get an IgG antibody, does that mean you’re currently sick and you’re recovered or does that mean that you had an IgG antibody from the virus that you had 17 years ago? What does that mean?

“And if you have an IgM antibody and you are completely asymptomatic, does that mean you’re ‘infected’ and you might be like Typhoid Mary, spreading stuff around?

“They mixed all that data together, they threw it all in a pot, so none of it has any validity, none of it. None of it! And since we don’t know what the true denominator is, we have no understanding about incidence and prevalence and…the death rate is absolutely irrelevant.”

The question becomes, ‘What the Hell are they going to put in the vaccine?’

To date, vaccines have NEVER BEEN TESTED for:

• synergistic toxicity
• carcinogenic potential
• mutagenic potential
• teratogenicity (causing birth defects)
• potential to impair fertility "

[Sue (Ayt)]

Creepy predictive programming, or what?
This show was from the episode shown in 2003. The coincidences are beyond the scope...
jY6-HvE5YdU

[shaberon]

How Psychopath John Rockefeller Wiped-Out Natural Cures to Create Big Pharma (https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/how-psychopath-john-rockefeller-wiped-out-natural-cures-to-create-big-pharma/?utm_campaign=steempress&utm=dailybrief)


Yes this is a good article, and in simple terms, combine it with the fact that Rockefeller + Carnegie back the Council on Foreign Relations, which more or less is policy for the State Department. Its British Sister is Chatham House, and the way they worked things out around the end of WW I largely "shaped the map" as we have it now. At the time, Woodrow Wilson said that such great men of business were still afraid of something international. Anyone with new money was generally disliked by old money such as the Astors. But oil took over medicine and education, and also agriculture, such as a tractor over a horse.

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/pseudo-science-behind-mysterious-assault-hydroxychloroquine




The Pseudo-Science Behind The Mysterious Assault On Hydroxychloroquine


I reviewed the scientific literature on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin (AZ), and their use for COVID-19. My conclusions:

HCQ-based treatments are effective in treating COVID-19, unless started too late.

Studies, cited in opposition, have been misinterpreted, invalid, or worse.

HCQ and AZ are some of the most tested and safest prescription drugs.

Severe COVID-19 frequently causes cardiac effects, including heart arrhythmia. QTc prolonging drugs might amplify this tendency. Millions of people regularly take drugs having strong QTc prolongation effect, and neither FDA nor CDC bother to warn them. HCQ+AZ combination, probably has a mild QTc prolongation effect. Concerns over its negative effects, however minor, can be addressed by respecting contra-indications.

Effectiveness of HCQ-based treatment for COVID-19 is hampered by conditions that are presented as precautions, delaying the onset of treatment. For examples, some states require that COVID-19 patients be treated with HCQ exclusively in hospital settings.

The COVID-19 Treatment Panel of NIH evaded disclosure of the massive financial links of its members to Gilead Sciences, the manufacturer of a competing drug remdesivir. Among those who failed to disclose such links are 2 out of 3 of its co-chairs.

Despite all the attempts by certain authorities to prevent COVID-19 treatment with HCQ and HCQ+AZ, both components are approved by FDA, and doctors can prescribe them for COVID-19.

< much more at link >

[Gwin Ru]

PRESCIENT: How Stephen King TV Series Eerily Mirrors COVID-19 Crisis (https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/05/05/prescient-2003-stephen-king-tv-movie-perfectly-mirrors-covid-19-crisis/)


Dead Zone - Plague
jY6-HvE5YdU

[Gwin Ru]

Jim Stone (http://82.221.129.208/.vm3.html):
http://82.221.129.208/.vm3.html
How about THIS for the branch covidians:

BUSTED: PRESIDENT MAGUFULI OF TANZANIA TESTS FRUIT, GOATS, MOTOR OIL AND MORE WITH COVID TESTS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE

HA HA, I know what (white) leftists REALLY think of Black people, and this has got to be about as much fun for the real racists as a wipe out on asphalt.

The president of Tanzania was suspicious of the coronavirus testing kits, so he sampled various random items from fruit to goats to motor oil and sent them in for covid testing under various people's names. All but the motor oil came back positive.

He has, after this, stated that coronavirus is an act of war and the tests were therefore intentionally sabotaged and could not be trusted.

It is virtually impossible to get the real perspective on this, because the MSM is whitewashing it, but here is what is known through the grapevine:

It was not only a few items that were sent in, but the main ones that got published were a sheep, a goat, a Tanzanian Paw Paw fruit and motor oil. There were a significant number of other samples also. Only the motor oil came back negative.

This was done because he noticed that all the covid tests were coming back positive and he did not believe it. So he started rubbing the swabs on random crap, attached false identities to them and they still came back positive.

There are an enormous number of misrepresentations on this story intentionally flaunted in even African media. Many are saying he blamed HIS lab techs. He did not do that. Many are saying there were only a few tests done this way. That is not accurate either. He in fact conducted a major bust with a large number of tests and when they came back positive, he called it an act of war by white countries and others who have a lot to gain from this virus being perceived as real, and then nullified the positive results from tests that actually came from real people. NONE of the MSM is reporting this, and none of alt media caught onto just how serious this is.

THERE ARE NOW TWO POSSIBILITIES:

1. The test kits are 100 percent hoax.

2. The virus is in the testing kits and that up your nose swab is the real disease delivery vector.

Did not happen (but highly implied in MSM reports): His people are corrupt and faking results. That did not happen if he said the tests themselves were sabotaged and used the phrase "ACT OF WAR."

It would be nice to see this go somewhere but it appears trolls and scammers successfully got this under control, and even sites I normally trust a LOT got this story at least partly wrong as a result.

wKRcPFk3v9k
----------------------------------------------------------

… or the virus was sprayed around like Australia thought of spraying aerosolized vaccines via airplanes...

Australia Determined To Vaccinate By Release Of Aerosolized GMO Vaccine (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?84242-Ebola-vaccine-that-can-be-inhaled-&p=985473&viewfull=1#post985473)

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Creepy predictive programming, or what?
This show was from the episode shown in 2003. The coincidences are beyond the scope...
jY6-HvE5YdU

Was going to post that myself, very creepy. Reminiscent of the Lone Gunman episode that "predicted" the WTC attacks, and aired just before 9/11.

FHpJbYdQHpI

Coincidence, foreknowledge, subconscious tapping of the time line, predictive programming...?

[shaberon]

It is virtually impossible to get the real perspective on this, because the MSM is whitewashing it, but here is what is known through the grapevine:



This is in the Times, Post, etc., and Snopes is unable to dismiss it.

Tanzania is also ordering the drink from Madagascar.

The first twelve American companies with "cookie jar" syndrome did not return their business loans for publicity's sake, it is because the Treasury said it may not forgiven, and it may be criminally prosecuted, if you had other sources of credit. Over $300 million has already been returned.

Some say the main purpose of the Fed is to make it "look like" the Treasury is not giving handouts to corporations and banks. It is easy to get lost in some of the technical jargon, but, we can find where the money is going here.

[onawah]

ITALIAN LEADER SLAMS ‘FALSE CORONAVIRUS NUMBERS: 25,000 DID NOT DIE, IT’S A WAY TO IMPOSE A DICTATORSHIP’
Posted by Amy Mek
May 4, 2020
https://rairfoundation.com/italian-leader-slams-false-coronavirus-numbers-25000-did-not-die-its-a-way-to-impose-a-dictatorship-watch/
https://rairfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Screen-Shot-2020-05-04-at-6.16.38-AM-825x340.png

"On Friday, April 24, 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship.

The member of the Forza Italia party slammed the closure of 60% of Italian businesses for 25,000 Chinese-Coronavirus deaths from the floor of the legislature. “It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism.” According to the National Institute of Health, 96.3% did not die of coronavirus, but of other pathologies stated Sgarbi – which means that only 925 have died from the virus and 24,075 have died of other things claimed Sgarbi, “….the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Tell the truth!”

Sgarbi’s controversial speech was delivered during ‘Cura Italia’ decree law discussions. The proposal intends to develop measures to strengthen the national health service based on what he claims is false data. Sgarbi challenged his colleagues to investigate the real numbers themselves and be united in the reporting the truth:

Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other…Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…

Watch the exclusively translated RAIR Foundation USA video of Vittorio Sgarbi’s speech:
bUCWcft6kao
Sgarbi has been a member of the Italian Parliament several times and also served also in Milan’s municipal government. Sgarbi is also a famous art critic, historian, cultural commentator and television personality.
Transcript: many thanks to Fousesquawk for the translation:
We are on the eve of April 25, and it is necessary to be united against dictatorships and united in the truth. Let’s not make this the chamber of lies.

Not the 26th of February, but the 9th of March, the science, the science evoked here said that the virus was little more than an influenza. That science is what inspired this government, it is said, it was said, and documented, it was said…

Don’t lie! Tell the truth! Don’t make this the chamber of lies. At least the principle of Giambattista Vico is applied, Vico: “verum ipsum factum” [we only know what we make]. So you have heard and you have given the numbers. I want to give them too. No, D’Attis, no, Pagani.

Don’t also say here 25,000 deaths. It’s not true. Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism. The numbers from the Higher Institute of Health say that 96.3% died from other diseases. Exactly the data, the numbers… the numbers. Say this, and it is the truth! It is the truth! Read it! Read it!

Colleagues…Colleague. —[Unintelligible] I have read them all. Sixty per cent died from other diseases, according to the Higher Institute of Health. If you don’t know it, study it!

Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:

Colleague Sgarbi, turn… —Colleague Sgarbi… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president. …[Unintelligible]

Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:

While Italy was a red zone, everyone here was without masks. Today, Basini is accused because he has to wear it. You are ridiculous! You didn’t wear it until the day before yesterday! That is exactly how it is.

In Germany, the economy, health care, and schools will work perfectly on May 4. We are a state with the fewest rights in Europe. Germany has shown proof of strength and the correct response. We here are once more humiliated by Germany even in illness. We have closed 60% of businesses.

I have given data, Dear Trizzino. Go check it out. No, it is clear that I was first to call for the closure of Parliament. Today, here we are, everybody in masks, while the other time, there was only [unintelligible]. There were very few — Dall’Osso. There were few who were wearing the mask, and today you are pointed at if you don’t wear it. Well, precisely because truth is the most important thing, let’s give the actual numbers; let us not continue to lie.

This is certainly strong data. I read it here too, Trizzino 56% in Lombardy, 14% in Emilia, 8% in Piedmont, 5% in Veneto. We cannot imagine applying uniform rules with such disparate zones of the epidemic. And so, I say, at least here we speak the truth. Measure ourselves against Germany.

Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti [infectious disease specialiat] said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other… Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…

Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:

Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president.

Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:

I simply said, they all give numbers but not false numbers. Twenty-five thousand people did not die of the coronavirus in Italy. It’s not true. It’s a way to terrorize Italians and impose a dictatorship of consent. It’s ridiculous!"

[greybeard]

Keep breathing onawah--your a breath of fresh air
As in
Each breath a gift.
Chris

[onawah]

CORONAVIRUS: THE GREAT AWAKENING
May 7, 2020
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
127K subscribers

"Doctors, nurses, scientists, police, and a celeb democrat, speak out; Dr. Zach Bush reveals why #Covid-19 is here, and how we come out of this a better people."
Zk9NIyc9JlA

[onawah]

COVID-19: The Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically Engineered Vaccines
MAY 07, 2020
By the Children’s Health Defense Team
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-safety/covid-19-the-spearpoint-for-rolling-out-a-new-era-of-high-risk-genetically-engineered-vaccines/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ca08d0ed-03bf-4482-97f3-f540d3f5666d
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/05-07-20-COVID-Vaccine-Technology_Featured_Image.jpg

[Note: This article represents Part I of a two-part series examining COVID-19 vaccine technologies and their implications.]

"For weeks, talking heads have been promoting the liability-free vaccine(s) that will save the world—so Bill Gates and Tony Fauci proclaim—from what Gates has now dubbed “Pandemic I.” As Microsoft News peddles self-congratulatory stories about the Gates Foundation’s reorientation of its priorities to devote “‘total attention’ to the pandemic,” Fauci—making the rounds of talk shows—pledges that a vaccine will make its debut in January 2021. Not to be outdone, the White House has now unveiled “Operation Warp Speed”—a joint pharmaceutical-government-military effort aimed at “substantially shrinking the development time for a vaccine”—and President Trump promises one by the end of the year.

Planet-wide COVID-19 vaccination—the overt objective that has all of these players salivating in anticipation—ignores a number of irrefutable obstacles. For one, the RNA virus being targeted, SARS-CoV-2, already “has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variants.” The variants include 19 never seen before as well as “rare changes that scientists had never imagined could happen.” Knowledge about these mutations may prove useful to clinicians wanting to better tailor their COVID-19 treatments, but the proliferation of mutations makes the chances of developing an effective vaccine immensely more uncertain.

Not to worry, say the entities funded by Gates (and also the Pentagon). Scientists working in the burgeoning field of synthetic biology are confident that they can “outdo” and outsmart nature using next-generation vaccine technologies such as gene transfer and self-assembling nanoparticles—along with invasive new vaccine delivery and record-keeping mechanisms such as smartphone-readable quantum dot tattoos. Does it matter that the researchers who have been experimenting with these approaches have never been able to overcome “nasty side effects”? Apparently not. Aided and abetted by the generous Gates and military funding, high-fanfare COVID-19 vaccine planning is proceeding apace.

Researchers reiterated this point … that for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.
Speed, not safety
From a manufacturing standpoint, vaccine makers—and particularly those making viral vaccines—have long chafed at the limitations of traditional vaccine technologies, which rely on processes that necessarily entail “a considerable lag time between antigen production and vaccine delivery.” Researchers reiterated this point again in 2018, writing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that “for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.”

In the 1980s, manufacturers were elated when scientists developed new genetic engineering techniques (recombinant DNA technology) that—through the use of “expression systems” (bacteria, yeast, insect cells, mammalian cells or plants such as tobacco)—made it possible to jumpstart vaccine production and produce so-called “subunit vaccines.” The hepatitis B vaccine was the first to employ this “entirely new” vaccine production approach, and a number of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the works are deploying these techniques. However, a complicating factor of subunit vaccines is that they must be bundled with “immunopotentiating” adjuvants that tend to trigger an imbalanced immune response.

Desirous of streamlining vaccine technology still further and enabling vaccine stockpiles in an even shorter time frame, researchers began tinkering in the mid-1990s with nucleic acid vaccines, which include DNA vaccines and messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. As a form of gene therapy, both represent a significant departure from classical vaccines. Whereas the latter introduce a vaccine antigen to produce an immune response, nucleic acid vaccines instead send the body instructions to produce the antigen itself. As one researcher explains, the nucleic acids “cause the cells to make pieces of the virus,” with the goal being that the immune system then “mounts a response to those pieces of the virus.”

Researchers quickly learned that both the DNA and mRNA vaccine options have serious downsides, and as a result, vaccines of this type have never been licensed. Nonetheless, almost one-fourth (20/83) of the vaccines listed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 “candidate vaccines” as of April 23—including two of the leading contenders—are DNA (Inovio) or mRNA (Moderna) vaccines (see table).

DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.
DNA vaccines
DNA vaccines are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell’s nucleus. According to one biotech scientist, “This is an incredibly difficult task given that our nuclei have evolved to prevent any foreign DNA from entering (Think viruses!).” Not surprisingly, then, when some DNA vaccines made it into clinical trials in the late 2000s, they were plagued by “suboptimal potency.” Scientists then came up with the idea of solving this problem by augmenting vaccine delivery with “electroporation”—electric shocks applied to the vaccine site (using a “smart device”) to make cell membranes more permeable and force the DNA into the cells. The improvements in vaccine efficacy were significant enough that electroporation remains a key design feature of some COVID-19 vaccine candidates today, including the Moderna vaccine that is now speeding toward Phase 2 clinical trials.

A second aspect of DNA vaccines—their gene-altering properties—is even more troubling and remains unresolved. DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of “integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.” Framed in more understandable terms, “disruption from DNA is like inserting a foreign ingredient in an existing recipe, which can change the resulting dish.” The permanent incorporation of synthetic genes into the recipient’s DNA essentially produces a genetically modified human being, with unknown long-term effects. Speaking of DNA gene therapy, one researcher has stated, “Genetic integrations using viral gene therapies . . . can have a devastating effect if the integration was placed in the wrong spot in [the] genome.” Discussing DNA vaccines specifically, the Harvard College Global Health Review elaborates:

Potential side effects could include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes.

mRNA vaccines
Because mRNA vaccines are “particularly suited to speedy development,” it is perhaps unsurprising that they are attracting attention as the “coronavirus frontrunners.” mRNA vaccines can reportedly generate savings of “months or years to standardize and ramp up . . . mass production.” Making lemonade out of lemons, insiders casually state that “while no mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed, the threat of a pandemic is a great incentive to accelerate their progress.”

Companies are enamored of the mRNA approach despite observations that the large mRNA molecules are “intrinsically unstable,” “prone to degradation” and may overactivate the immune system. On the plus side, from vaccine scientists’ standpoint, mRNA vaccines need only reach the cell cytoplasm rather than the nucleus—an apparently “simpler technical challenge”—although the approach still demands “delivery technologies that can ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions.” Formulations such as Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine tackle these challenges by using “chemical modifications to stabilize the mRNA” and liquid nanoparticles to “package it into an injectable form.”

mRNA approaches seem to attract researchers with a highly mechanistic view of human beings. One such individual praises mRNA for its “inherent ‘programmability,” stating “Much like [a] computer [operating system], mRNA therapy can reprogram [one’s] body to produce its own therapies” [emphasis in original]. The CEO of Moderna describes mRNA approaches—which use “custom-built” strands of mRNA to “turn the body’s cells into ad hoc drug factories”—as being “like software: You can just turn the crank and get a lot of products going into development.” Likewise, the journal Nature (commenting on mRNA technology from “a biotech and industrial perspective”) enthuses that the approach “allows rapid refinement with almost limitless combinations of derivatives.”

Vaccine researchers familiar with both DNA and mRNA vaccines like to play up mRNA vaccine safety, citing the fact that the vaccines do not have to penetrate the cell nucleus. However, with years of mRNA vaccine experimentation behind them, none of these researchers has yet achieved licensure. Why? One answer may be that in preclinical studies, mRNA vaccines have displayed an “intrinsic” inflammatory component that makes it difficult to establish an “acceptable risk/benefit profile.” mRNA enthusiasts admit that there is, as yet, an inadequate understanding of the inflammation and autoimmune reactions that may result. This raises many questions about what will happen if regulators grant the manufacturers of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines their wish for “a fast-track process to get mRNA vaccines to people sooner.”

Racing toward profits
The hijacking of nearly all economic, social, artistic and religious activity by SARS-CoV-2 is disturbing on many levels, not least because of what it reveals about the public’s uncritical acceptance of official spin and its yearning for medical silver bullets. As a vaccine researcher at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute has stated:

When China quarantined an entire megacity in January, People said “only China can do that.” Then we saw similarly drastic measures in several democratic countries. I think it says something about our trust in medical solutions. Today, we expect to be able to develop medicines and vaccines against different diseases in a way we didn’t in the past.

The rush to develop gene-tampering COVID-19 vaccines is also accelerating the conjoined-twins fusion of pharma and biotech. The lucrative biopharma sector is now the fastest-growing segment of the global drug industry, currently representing 20% of the worldwide market and displaying an annual growth rate that is more than double that of conventional pharma. And COVID-19 vaccines are helping rescue some biopharma companies’ shaky bottom lines. In 2017, for example, Moderna was struggling to “keep afloat its brash promise to reinvent medicine” after an experimental therapy that it was counting on proved too unsafe to test in humans. Fast forward to 2020, when “bad news about the coronavirus is good news for Moderna stock.” Other biopharma companies formerly on the skids are likewise poised to make record profits from COVID-19.

As biopharma pursues its unfettered, medical-ethics-be-damned race toward a COVID-19 pot of gold, the public needs to take a critical look at the industry’s disincentives for safety and also take a firm stand against the horrifying prospect of coronavirus vaccine mandates. Otherwise, genetically engineered COVID-19 vaccines are likely to start permanently altering genes, triggering autoimmunity and serving as the catalyst for other vaccine injuries or deaths, and—unhampered by any legal liability—none of the commercial or government actors responsible will likely care.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/05-07-20-CHD-covid-vaccine-technology-Chart-1583x2048.jpg

[onawah]

Dr Moss's testimony in #Pennsylvania
YES on #HB286VaXism Videos
May 2, 2019 ·
https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB286/2019https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB286/2019

442132399855427/

https://www.facebook.com/VaXismVideos/videos/442132399855427/

[onawah]

SIGN THE PETITION: Stop the Genetic Engineering of Viruses! Shut Down All ‘Biodefense’ Labs Immediately!
Most people associate the words “genetic engineering” with GMO corn and soy crops, Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller and the anti-GMO movement’s hard-fought (but ultimately lost) campaign for GMO labeling laws.
Organic Consumers Association
5/8/20
"As dangerous and unnecessary as genetic engineering is when used to modify food, the technology has an even more potentially deadly use: biowarfare.

It’s time to stop allowing—and funding—the dangerous and illegal activity of genetically engineering viruses, under the guise of “biodefense,” in the U.S. and worldwide.

SIGN THE PETITION: Stop the Genetic Engineering of Viruses! Shut Down All Biowarfare Labs Immediately!"

https://advocacy.organicconsumers.org/page/18957/petition/1?en_chan=fb&locale=en-US&ea.tracking.id=facebook&en_ref=11487934

[Hughe]

I got it from Stop5GAppeal mailing list today.

---

Julian Rose says it all in this excellent article
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/the-covid-shockdown-doctrine-and-how-to-beat-it.html?utm_source=Activist+Post+Subscribers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ddea97e9ba-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_b0c7fb76bd-ddea97e9ba-387838753
It is time to stand up and put a stop to this. We cannot go on debating - we now need to go into urgent action.
"To fail to act in defence of life when it is obvious that every valuable aspect of life is under attack, is to be complicit in the crime."

Excerpts:

The cause of saving families, friends and communities from being enslaved by what has increasingly shown itself to be a despotic, sinister and ruthless cabal fully intent on destroying the rule of law and replacing it with a fascistic police state. It's no good hiding one's head in the sand and praying it will never come to this. It already has – and we have to act accordingly.
Doctors, recognising that they are being deeply misled about the nature of this so called 'pandemic' must refuse to go along with the lies.
Within the legal profession, let all those who retain some human judgement demand that an immediate emergency injunction be tabled in the high court of law in their country
Let all those who work in communications and media recognise that they carry a moral and ethical responsibility to do more than simply pass on a purely superficial repetition of what it is they are on hand to report.
Teachers: stop forcing locked-down children to sit behind computer screens for hours at a time
Step bravely forward and embrace its radical nature, we are coming together now in common commitment to light the fire of truth and justice – and to forever keep it lit.


The Covid Shockdown Doctrine — and How to Beat It
May 8, 2020

Op-Ed by Julian Rose

Those who have read Naomi Klein's seminal book The Shock Doctrine will remember how the 'short sharp shock' (primarily economic) was the tool fashioned by the Chicago School of Economics in order to create regime change in countries that resisted US hegemonic power grabs in the 1980s and 1990s.

This neocolonial heist was administered to a number of South American countries, in the Middle East and also in Eastern Europe, where, in 1989, Poland's Solidarity movement was undermined by the Chicago School's Jeffrey Sachs posing as a libertarian anti-communist bringer of gifts from the West.

A poisoned chalice, as it turned out, as Sachs infiltrated the hugely popular worker-led new political movement known as The Third Way and landed Poland with a draconian IMF loan whose repayment terms wrecked the country's industrial base.

A very similar scenario was repeated in Greece whose people are still struggling at the hands of the same treatment meted-out by The European Commission, the IMF and the European Central Bank, collectively known as The Troika.

Now 'The Shock Doctrine' is back with us again – with a vengeance. But this time it's not just a national shock prescription, but a global one, executed on the concocted premise of a dangerous virus which is purported to have escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, at the turn of the year.

The first move of this latest attempted grand heist has been to get around half the population locked-down in their own homes and induced into a state of fear paralysis. A formula that is activated by the 'instructed' mainstream media spreading a panic-warning of said virus spooking its way into all avenues of life and causing some form of untreatable sickness.

The effectiveness of this fear-based indoctrination programme has been remarkable. A recent national opinion poll conducted in the UK suggests that more than 60% of the British public – believing what they are hearing and consequently suffering the Covid fear symptoms – do not want the lockdown measures to be lifted or even eased. This might be explained by the fact that the BBC – a masterful spreader of political disinformation – is regarded by many in the UK as 'god', followed closely by the Queen, on whose estate the Pirbright Institute is housed, a Coronavirus patent is officially registered and a Covid-19 vaccine is being developed.

The tactics currently being deployed rely upon deliberate deception, preplanned social engineering and applied behavioural psychology being trained on great swathes of the world population via a completely compliant media which works hand in hand with a corporate/banker/political cabal whose sights are set on nothing less than totalitarian control of all avenues of human society as well as of the human brain.

As long as actions taken in relation to the grand Covid scam can continue to be sold as a genuine attempt to protect citizens, rather than screw them, the lockdown can be largely kept in place, enabling the implementation of a rapid desecration of the fundamental constitutional rights of citizens living in what are claimed to be 'democratic' countries.

But as soon as a critical mass see through the veil and cease to buy the lie, the tables will be turned; an event likely to lead to a showdown between a steadily emerging recognition of truth and a rapidly fracturing 'fortress lie'. Our job at this moment of time is to catalyse this process.

Notwithstanding the fact that any and all preventable premature deaths carry with them a real sense of loss, the outrageous absurdity of pretending that the release of a virus recognised to be a strain of common flu, should constitute a valid reason for wrecking billions of people's lives and income sources, from one end of the world to the other, has got to be revealed for what it is: an act of preplanned genocide.

Enough time has passed and enough evidence accrued to know that the death toll ascribed to Covid-19 – as farcically imprecise as the statistics are – is less than the average loss of life brought about by the standard annual winter flu cycle in Northern hemisphere countries – and just a fraction of the deaths resulting from cancer, heart disease and the other major sicknesses to which modern man typically succumbs.

So instead of poring over oceans of epidemiological evidence as though training to acquire a PhD in virology, we need to turn to face the enemy and take direct action to halt the advance of the lie machine. Studying the small details of exactly what forms the constituent parts of this particular strain of sickness, is a deviation we cannot afford to indulge in. Let specialist doctors get on with this; but let the rest of us jump to our feet and slam closed the oak door that protects our most fundamental freedoms from being eviscerated right in front of our eyes.

Doctors, recognising that they are being deeply misled about the nature of this so called 'pandemic' must refuse to go along with the lies. They should form their own informal committees in which to share their knowledge and help those in need using best practices and common sense. Thousands are in danger of breaking the Hippocratic Oath by following directives that defy logic and rational thought.

Within the legal profession, let all those who retain some human judgement demand that an immediate emergency injunction be tabled in the high court of law in their country; leading to a court order being issued against all attempts to change national constitutions and other legal acts 'on the hoof' without any proper debate or opportunity for those under attack to put their case and defend their lawful rights.

Let all those who work in communications and media recognise that they carry a moral and ethical responsibility to do more than simply pass on a purely superficial repetition of what it is they are on hand to report. All too often journalists today act like robots – without ever exploring and reporting on the deeper issues that lie behind significant news events. Editors are equally culpable, if not more so. Both tend to land-up as hired hands to billionaires and bought-out governments.

May such individuals now wake-up to the realisation that they have a duty to inform the general public of whether those whose statements they report are acting in the interests or in abuse of the health and welfare of the greater public they are supposed to serve.

Journalists of all descriptions have a vital role to perform at this time. If acting responsibly means getting kicked-out of one's job – so be it – one will at least regain a blessedly clear conscience and win the opportunity to club together with other members of the resistance, to form real and much needed new avenues of independent communication, thereby conveying words of enlightenment rather than being complicit in the further dumbing-down of fellow human beings.

Teachers; stop forcing locked-down children to sit behind computer screens for hours at a time. The harm this is doing far outweighs the value of the teaching and lands parents with the task of acting as psychologists for their own distracted children. This torture must cease, as indeed must all thoughtless compliance with State educational programmes.

To all those who are in any degree enlightened, regardless of what profession, job or other diverse interest one may feel aligned with – now is the time to rally to the cause. The cause of saving families, friends and communities from being enslaved by what has increasingly shown itself to be a despotic, sinister and ruthless cabal fully intent on destroying the rule of law and replacing it with a fascistic police state. It's no good hiding one's head in the sand and praying it will never come to this. It already has – and we have to act accordingly.
As a senior member of the British House of Lords said recently "Historically tyranny isn't imposed, people give away their freedom for safety". Well, we've had quite enough of this sort of cowardice, and what's more – there is no 'safety' on the other side of this particular coin. To fail to act in defence of life when it is obvious that every valuable aspect of life is under attack, is to be complicit in the crime.

Another prescient statement concludes "When injustice becomes law resistance becomes duty". Everyone of us must be primed for action now. Do not consent to being treated like a mindless automaton unless you are one. Hammer those who hold positions of office and don't allow them to simply follow the script they have been told to adopt.

Remind them that their support for the Covid Shockdown plan to take a totally disproportionate wrecking-ball to the basic constitutional rights of the individual while using the excuse that they are protecting the health of the population, is a criminal neglect of duty which will not stand-up in a court of law. And while you're at it – tell them you do not consent to being irradiated by WiFi 4/5G microwaves emitted by telecommunications networks, transmitters and masts erected without any public consultation or approval.

We have no option other than to take back control of our individual destinies and throw off the chains of hypnosis under which too many have been blindly operating for far too long.

This is an auspicious moment for mankind – so have no fear. Once on this new path we will find ourselves guided by powers far greater than those attempting to enslave us. This is the call we cannot turn away from. Step bravely forward and embrace its radical nature, we are coming together now in common commitment to light the fire of truth and justice – and to forever keep it lit.

Julian Rose is a writer, organic farmer, international activist and holistic practitioner/teacher. Two of Julian's books 'Creative Solutions to a World in Crisis' and 'Overcoming the Robotic Mind – Why Humanity Must Come Through' are particularly prescient reading for this time. See www.julianrose.info for more information.

[Ratszinger]

Two of my siblings are making major changes to how they raise and educate their children after this lock down. They discovered the crap education and learning techniques for math and all that has been going on in the school systems during this and both have yanked their children from the school systems and are now home schooling. They are appalled at the goings on in education in this country. I don't have details on it but I know they've done it and that they have no intention of letting their children back into public schools in WV.

[shaberon]

India (https://www.rt.com/business/488051-india-red-carpet-us/) is drooling to relocate a bunch of manufacturing from China.

Well, it is the same as how these southern states were carpetbagged. Cheap labor, tax breaks, and easing of other restrictions.

Concurrently, Indian border guards attacked the Chinese at Naku La.

That would be a major change, if a whole bunch of manufacturing packed up and moved. It would be an even bigger change if those two quit fighting over some glaciers and sand. But the problems arise from the British Invasion of Tibet. They were afraid of it becoming friends with Russia. At the time, 1904, the Chinese believed they owned Tibet, and that any treaties it made were invalid. India supported Tibetan independence, and when the Chinese invaded Tibet, they occupied the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh in 1962. China, India, and Tibet all have their own version of who is what and where the border should be. Tibet believes they owned the area around Tawang and it was not a part of British India; India seized it when China took over Tibet. But instead of fighting in AP nowadays, they do it at the desolate passes.

The situation is considered the end of the old version of the Great Game, since the British were satisfied that Russia was not there. After that it turned to oil and Mosul, Iraq.

India needs to find a way to lift millions out of destitution without drowning in pollution. They may get at least something out of this.

[Tintin]

There is a delicious irony in the current test environment rolling out of the UK NHSX (https://www.nhsx.nhs.uk/) contact tracing application happening on the Isle of Wight at the moment - that's David Icke's place of residence. I'd say it's a fairly safe bet that that is one household that won't be adopting it.

In any case take-up is likely to be traditionally very low despite how the government will inevitably spin its "success" - 57% of over 55s in the UK do not own a smartphone. With a median age of 46 the Isle of Wight population is a little more mature demographically than other areas of the UK. And, in any case, if some are identifying as a Jedi Knight (http://localstats.co.uk/census-demographics/england/south-east/isle-of-wight) which certainly appears to be the case, then good luck trying to foister a track-and-trace application there.


43575

Looked at more intuitively of course, and a track record that would support that, it's a safe assumption that the very notion of track-and-trace is just a means for mine sweeping yet more personal and highly sensitive personal information.

Interestingly in more technologically savvy (sic) nations, in this instance Singapore and South Korea, nations well used to technological surveillance by its State, citizens are devising more imaginative ways to avoid what has also come to be known as syndrome surveillance or syndromic surveillance (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/syndromic-surveillance-systems-and-analyses).

*****

Track and trace or duck and dive – Covid19 surveillance apps


[Adoption rates]"In practice, it will only work if at least 80% of people get the app onto their mobile. The evidence for such enthusiasm is poor: Singapore, which deployed this technique in an app called Trace Together early on in the pandemic, had only 13% of adoption rate. This is surprisingly low, for a country where surveillance is prevalent and the population has been trained to accept it without objections."


Posted by: @EvaPascoe (https://twitter.com/EvaPascoe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor) in Writing 28 days ago
Source: Cybersalon (http://cybersalon.org/track-and-trace-or-duck-and-dive-covid19-surveillance-apps/)

Covid19 has brought us pain and suffering but also a huge number of new words and phrases. One of them is Syndromic Surveillance. It’s a new one for me, although this term has been around for a few years now, as bio-warfare anti-terror preparedness tech kit launched it the wake of 9/11. Recent events have put it under the spotlight once again. The term refers to methods relying on detection of individual and community health indicators that are noticeable before confirmed GP diagnoses are made. The practice of electronically monitoring and reporting real-time medical data to proactively identify unusual disease patterns, right off the start has hit the conflict between public health and personal privacy. Originally developed for detection of covert bioterrorist attack, it could be used against anthrax (ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC353021/, detecting influenza like illness as an early warning.

Inevitably, syndromic surveillance is now making its way rapidly into our everyday language during Corona time. We want to make the invisible visible, finding ways to force the virus the surface, to show us it’s deadly footprint. Syndromic Surveillance is being deployed in the fight against coronavirus using Google-Apple (and other) combined technical super-surveillance machinery, aggregating geolocation data from mobile phones, cell towers, CCTV and other currently existing spy tech.

The need to use syndromic surveillance to detect movements and track-and-trace to log contacts of infected individuals is legitimate as we need all hands to the deck on this biggest health crisis in over a hundred years. Governments are scrambling to find weapons that can speed up the ability to open our economies. It is a race against time and no doubt our individual privacy will be pitted against our ability to get people and society back to work.

A number of countries like Singapore and South Korea have already introduced some format of syndromic surveillance to map the spread of the virus and monitor ‘social distancing’. Google and Apple have already had the bright idea of developing ‘track-and-trace’ apps where governments would not have access to specific individual’s locations (https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/u-s-wants-smartphne-location-data-fight-coronavirus-privacy-advocates-n1162821).

Both companies insist that the user will be required to opt-in and data would be held only till the end of the quarantine period, something hard to take at face value after Google Health’s recent record of illegally obtaining real-time medical admissions data from UK top hospitals in 2015 (https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/03/google-deepmind-nhs-deal-health-data-illegal-ico-says.html).

Facebook is already providing health researchers and non-government organisations in some countries with anonymised data to help disease prevention efforts, so expanding this monitoring to Covid-19 would be a quick win according to the company.

There are 6 problems to examine before we lurch into tech-led-saviour-miracle-cures territory.

1/ Adoption Rates

The first is adoption rates challenge. Since Apple, Google and governments seem to insist this will be an opt-in tool (https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/asia-pacific/singapore-government-launches-new-app-contact-tracing-combat-spread-covid-19), we need to understand how many people are likely to download the apps.

In practice, it will only work if at least 80% of people get the app onto their mobile.

The evidence for such enthusiasm is poor: Singapore, which deployed this technique in an app called Trace Together early on in the pandemic, had only [a] 13% [of] adoption rate (https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/03/26/countries-are-using-apps-and-data-networks-to-keep-tabs-on-the-pandemic). This is surprisingly low, for a country where surveillance is prevalent and the population has been trained to accept it without objections.


43574

The likelihood of this download by privacy-sensitive Europeans or Americans must be lower than Singaporeans. With such big gaps in data, even predictive analytics are going to be worthless (https://www.dummies.com/programming/big-data/data-science/the-limitations-of-the-data-in-predictive-analytics/).

2/ Accessibility
The second issue is accessibility. Even in UK, a fairly pro-mobile country, 96% of under 24s are glued to their mobiles 24/7. However, as noted by Statista (https://www.statista.com/statistics/271851/smartphone-owners-in-the-united-kingdom-uk-by-age/), only 57% of over 55 year olds have smartphone phones and even those are mainly used for phone calls. Of course the government could make mobile phone ownership mandatory, issuing Free Phone For All Corbyn-like directive, forcing mobile phone providers to supply the 43% of 55 year olds who don’t have a phone to acquire one. But that will take a long time, plus add time required to teach the newbies how to use it.

To make matters worse, of the people in the 55+ category, the portion of them who actually have mobile phones and then proactively download apps is 39% (this is US data, with a lot lower numbers for UK). Covid19 strikes older people with higher frequency and worse mortality, so it hardly makes sense to latch on to the mobile app-based tool that only young, relatively Covid-19-proof people are going to download.

3/ Lack of precision
Third problem is a technical issue as telecommunication firms have cell towers data and are happy to give it to the government, but those give highly imprecise data (https://searchengineland.com/cell-phone-triangulation-accuracy-is-all-over-the-map-14790). The granularity would not be good enough to determine precise location if the person was staying in the house or stepped out to the other site of the street and out of their allocated quarantine zone (https://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/911/Apps%20Wrkshp%202015/911_Help_SMS_WhitePaper0515.pdf). It tends to be accurate within a street or a block, ¾ of square mile but not much more than that (https://ssd.eff.org/en/module/problem-mobile-phones).

Using Bluetooth is not plain sailing either, as it will send a ping regardless if the person is half a meter or 10 meters apart from another phone (https://electronics.howstuffworks.com/bluetooth-surveillance2.htm). It is all very well to use geolocation for an overview of population movements, something that we have used extensively for footfall research for High Street Revival projects (https://www.evapascoe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/GrimseyReview2018.pdf), but in practice, for precise tracking it would create far too many false positives to be very useful.

4/ Battery limitations
Forth issue is battery time – we struggle with it anyway, with my Airplane Mode on as a default to prevent getting stuck. Bluetooth, despite not as bad battery-wise as some people think, its still is a power sapping tool. It would be quite a commitment for the general public to have it on all the time, particularly as it would have to work many times harder, passing by other devices with newly added Bluetooth on. We could learn to manage our batteries better (https://senion.com/insights/bluetooth-drain-battery/), but it would be a behaviour change for many as most of us are already struggling to get through the day on a single charge (https://www.techwalla.com/articles/what-are-the-limitations-of-bluetooth).


43576

Even if Bluetooth On was made mandatory by the government, the reality is that the phones will run out of juice half-way through the day, rendering it useless for any comprehensive syndromic surveillance as people tend to move around in the evenings after work, by which time your phone would be dead unless everyone gets a free monster portable charger (a good idea but somewhat unlikely).

5/ Cybersecurity
The fifith issue is the problem of cybersecurity if the phone is being used for work as Bluetooth is not secure (https://www.techwalla.com/articles/the-disadvantages-of-bluetooth-technology). Bluejacking, bluesnafring or bluebugging are daily threats to all of us (https://www.psafe.com/en/blog/bluetooth-security-vunlerabilities/) who use smartphones for business.

Corporates don’t even like Zoom videoconferencing and their invasive recording habits, so they would not take well to the company phone being tracked, with the risk of cybersecurity if the data leaks or falls into competitor’s hands. In reality, we would have to carry two phones, one for work and one personal with the Track-And-Trace app on, which would cut the acceptance rate by half amongst professionals.

6/ Avoiding testing
Last, but most important issue is the perceived negative risk by the individual tested and being tracked and therefore their willingness to download the up. South Korea used a combination of cell-phone location data, CCTV and credit -card records to monitor people’s movements. When a person tested as positive, a whole haul of data was released including name, address, gender, credit card history and a full log of goings and comings from local shops. Even visiting a toilet or a love motel room is being noted, as well as extra visual information, for example if the person wore a mask. This level of details led of course to a rise in ‘armchair detectives’ harassing and exposing neighbours for minor departures from the rules. Some of the attacks were physical, it also created the atmosphere of mistrust, where many citizens refused to get tested, clearly the opposite of government’s intentions (https://www.theverge.com/interface/2020/4/10/21215267/covid-19-contact-tracing-apps-bluetooth-coronavirus-flaws-public-health).

In fact, as people started ducking-and-diving and leaving the phone at home, or sharing a phone with non-corona members of the family, South Korean government had to switch to wrist-bands to force the use (https://www.businessinsider.com/south-korea-wristbands-coronavirus-catch-people-dodging-tracking-app-2020-4?r=US&IR=T). No doubt it will take enterprising Koreans a few days more to figure out how to duck this one, as nobody wants to get doxed or lynched by a neighbour going mental after too many weeks of lockdown.

What next?
The bottom line is that governments are hollowing out our hard-fought personal privacy despite the fact that much of the tech used for track-and-trace is ineffective or downright harmful as it puts people off testing like in South Korea.

The truth is that the track-and-trace apps are a diversion for the press riding on ‘there is an app for that’ syndrome of wishful thinking that has pestered our techno-optimistic Wired-reading governments for over a decade.

Syndromic surveillance and track-and-trace apps may be a small part of the solution, but short of inserting a chip into the body of everyone (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/open-economy/businesses-planting-microchips-in-employees/) on the planet, the real solution is the expensive, analogue and technically unexciting mass scale testing for live cases as well for antibodies to establish who had it.

Anything else is just a dead cat on the dining room table.

****

1259804268036608000

[greybeard]

'Stay alert' - Government attempts to explain confusing new coronavirus slogan

That kind of implies --check out what others are doing -- leading to informing.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1jqlU6pTE0

[norman]

Dr Andrew Kaufman - They Want to Modify Us

https://trending.sfo2.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/weblyf/home/weblyf/public_html/2020/04/dr.-andrew-kaufman.jpg


MP3 [1 minute 30 seconds]
https://app.box.com/s/h79fvlej7aiesfibc7lilgan8t2nmi2j


The technology to be used to administer the 'Gates' vaccine is the same technology they use to tweak GMO plants and animals.

No wonder they want to brand the bodies they do this to.


Source Interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x86AFs9pYl4

[AutumnW]

There are reasons to think Covid19 may be a biowarfare agent either leaked or intentionally released. What I don't get is people wanting to get out there and protest the lockdown IF they believe this. If they HAVE to get out to work because they are hungry and can't pay their rent or mortgage, it makes sense.

But there are people on this forum, from what I can see, who are claiming a biowarfare conspiracy, and encouraging outdoor protests. Maybe I am mistaken. Not sure. Maybe that's the 5G crowd. Sometimes it's difficult to figure out what people believe about Covid and why.

[onawah]

The Chinese system comes to America
by Jon Rappoport
May 11, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/11/the-chinese-system-comes-to-america/

"The plan: use the “pandemic” as the rationale for “re-imagining” the guts of society—education, the workplace, medical care, transportation, public events, social relationships, the family…

Thus installing a new culture.

That desiccated dusty vampire, NY Governor Cuomo, and the cosmically psychopathic Howdy Doody, Bill Gates, are in the process of re-imagining education in NY State. Naturally, it’s all about more computers, and remote learning.

I guess the dinosaur called BOOKS won’t work, because there’s no glowing screen, and the ability to read is a prerequisite.

In other news, the Chinese social credit system is coming to corporate America. (The Wall St. Journal has a relevant podcast, “Welcome Back to the Office, Your Every Move Will Be Watched.”) Huge companies are scrambling to put together packages to sell to other huge companies:

Social distancing in offices, automatically monitored in real time; a caste system for employees based on health indicators; a credit score for each worker at the end of the day showing up on his cell phone; wall-to-wall surveillance…

Not just for now. For the new “re-imagined” America after the lockdowns are relaxed.

Unconstitutional, you say? Yes, there will be legal cases. This is called at-will employment. A corporation tells an employee: “You don’t want to submit to an antibody test? Or a vaccine? You don’t want to carry your cell around with you at work, so we can accomplish minute-to-minute contact tracing? You don’t want to wear a wrist band that measures social distancing? Fine. We understand. This is a free country. But you can’t work here anymore…”

How could this happen?

Who—one of the richest men in the world—loved the Mao Revolution in China? Who wrote about it glowingly, in the NY Times: “Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [30-60 million killed by their own government], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” (“From a China Traveler”, The New York Times, August 10, 1973.)

Who sent his agent, the president of the United States, Richard Nixon, to China, a year earlier, to open up trade after 25 years of diplomatic isolation?

Whose family had staged a revolution in medicine in the early 20th century, ultimately forcing a pharmaceutical paradigm down the throats of billions of people?

Who extended the germ theory of disease to the point at which populations would be hypnotized by it?

Who knew that medical tyranny and dictatorship were the roads to travel, in order to gain control of nations and bring in a new world order?

DAVID ROCKEFELLER.

His beloved Chinese system of slavery comes to America.

Speaking of re-imagining, here is a backgrounder I wrote four years ago. It lays out the operation known as the Trilateral Commission, created by David Rockefeller.

Its goal? A collectivist world, run as a corporate entity. What better excuse for its necessity than a global “pandemic?” Top-down governance of the planet, in order to detect the earliest signs of disease outbreaks anywhere…

Backgrounder: The secret circle that controls governments

Who is in charge of destroying separate nations?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.

It’s called the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.”

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example:

* Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary
* James Jones, National Security Advisor
* Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee
* Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence

Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).

The conversation was public knowledge at the time.

Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.

The following 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.

US (and other nations’) economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission created in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

When Carter won the presidential election (1976), his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said, if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.

—One planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, “to restore stability,” “for the good of all.”

And one day in the future, a student would ask his teacher, “What happened to the United States?” And the teacher would say, “It was a criminal enterprise based on individual freedom. Fortunately, our leaders rescued the people and taught them the superior nature of HARMONY AND COOPERATION.” "

[shaberon]

If it is correct that Bank of England (https://www.globalresearch.ca/bank-england-secret-bail-out-big-business-100bn-committed-3-weeks/5712485) has an "open secret" policy similar to the U. S. business loans, but, confined to the largest and highest-rated companies without being compelled to say whom:

"If a company meets these requirements, the Bank then purchases an amount of short-term debt from the company with brand new money it creates entirely for this purpose. This is public money pure and simple...

We’ve only learnt about a handful of company bailouts (such as EasyJet, Greggs, Redrow Homes and First Group) backhandedly through the press...

Tesco has paid out £900 million in dividends to investors despite securing a £585 million tax break from the Government. Irrespective of the arguments here, Tesco, who by their own admission, has a strong balance sheet, has taken nearly £600m from the taxpayer in a desperate moment to the benefit of its shareholders. Tesco biggest shareholders are the American giant Blackrock with Norges Bank and Schroders Bank close behind."

Here, when the largest job loss report in history was announced, the stock market went up. The way this works, is, the aforementioned Blackrock acts as a broker in the situation that:

Every day, the Fed (https://www.globalresearch.ca/depression-usa/5712447) is spending $80 billion to buy up assets from banks and corporations to fuel the market rise.

If we follow this money, does it seem to have the least bit of intent to exploit labor by sending them back to work while the disease outbreak is still basically the same thing, make them accept inferior conditions and increased mass poverty?

What will happen in the U. S. is that unlike the Federal government, states do not have any deficit spending, so they cannot really get a loan to cover the gaps. The inevitable budget shortfalls will shear social services first.

[onawah]

Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine
45,510 views•May 10, 2020
Spiro Skouras
61.9K subscribers

"In this powerful interview Spiro is joined with Doctor Andrew Kaufman. Spiro and Dr. Kaufman discuss the expanding curtailment of basic civil liberties being normalized under the false pretext of a global health emergency.

Doctor Kaufman lays his reputation and his career on the line as he blows the whistle, on what he describes as a manufactured crisis to carry out a preplanned agenda to facilitate global governance and population control.

Doctor Kaufman is a well educated medical professional who convincingly illustrates, using the CDC's own technical data, how the public has been manipulated on the grandest scale.



Moderator Note from Tintin @19:09GMT May 15th 2020: not for the first time Youtube has removed the video attached to the original link, that I have now replaced with this one - below - from [B]altcensored.com. A gentle reminder to everyone when it comes to posting links to videos on Youtube: download them wherever possibleand wetransfer them to us if you can't otherwise provide links to them, or find alternative other sites to link to. There is, and has been for a while, as you must all surely know by now, a major purge going on. I'll get this into the Avalon Library just as soon as that's back up and running. In the meantime this is downloadable by clicking on the 'three dots' set to right bottom on the frame via the below link, or via the embedded film. Kia ora, Tintin.

Dr Andrew Kaufman joins Spiro Skouras

Dr Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID 19 Vaccine

https://altcensored.com/watch?v=XNGk22-91HY

https://archive.org/download/youtube-XNGk22-91HY/Dr_Andrew_Kaufman_They_Want_To_Genetically_Modify_Us_With_The_COVID_19_Vaccine-XNGk22-91HY.mkv

***********************************************************************************************
Reviewed by Alexandra Bruce, Forbidden Knowledge:
"Dr Andrew Kaufman joins Spiro Skouras with his laser-like way of describing what is happening around the world with this Globalist "pandemic"

"In an unprecedented way, we see all of the governments around the world, with very few exceptions, all adopting the same policies, all at the same timeframe, right? This tells us that that this is a highly-coordinated effort, internationally and it tells us that there is a group of people or individuals who are directing the governments, essentially what to do.

"This is compatible with a Globalist agenda, moving towards a One World Government, with tighter control over the population, with a reduced population, with a new financial, monetary and currency system, and there's evidence for all these aspects and I think the overall plan has been well laid-out in the United Nations document, Agenda 21, later changed to Agenda 2030.

"There are many other supporting documents, like you pointed out, the Rockefeller document and there are several others, that essentially gives all the details to this plan and they all correlate to the policies that are taking place right now.

"They basically want to inject genes into us and they're using this procedure called 'electroporation', where they apply an electric current through two extra needles with the vaccine that creates little holes in our cells that allow the DNA to go inside our own cells and then they are supposed to make foreign proteins that supposedly generate immunity...
"They want to make us into Genetically-Modified Organisms, because this is the exact same procedure that they would be using to make a Genetically-Modified Organism."

Dr Kaufman is risking his reputation and his medical license to get this information out as widely as possible because he doesn't want his children to live in a world with no freedom, which he believes is where we're headed if this isn't rejected by the people.

Citing the CDC's own publicly-available data, updated daily on their website, Kaufman points out that there is no "excess mortality" charting. In fact, the number of deaths this season is lower than it has been for the past three years.
This leads him to think that this so-called pandemic is a "manufactured public relations, marketing operation." There is no virus or disease but there are major changes to government policies in all areas that are severely limiting our freedoms.

He says the novel coronavirus has, in fact never been isolated and that its identity is based on tiny snippets of DNA fed into a computer model - which, he says is also how the SARS virus of the 2003 was identified. The COVID-19 virus is being classified as a member of that SARS family because it shares 80% of its genetics with SARS, based on this very slipshod modeling.

For some perspective on how genetically distant 80% is, human beings share 80% of our genomes with cattle.

Moreover, the sample population originally used to collect materials and identify the COVID-19 virus was 7 people - and there was no control group. None of the basic scientific standards have been met in the identification of the novel coronavirus, such as purifying and isolating the virus particle through a filter. Its identification is based solely on theoretical and digital modeling.

These are just a few examples of the bad science involved. There's much more that he details here. In short, this pandemic a massive medical fraud.
Since beginning of this #CoronaHoax, we've been hearing all kinds of contradictory information about the very nature of viruses, themselves, with some subscribing to
Rudolf Steiner's suggestion that viruses don't exist at all but that they're the excreted toxicity of cells, aka exosomes.

Spiro asks Dr Kaufman, "At this point, they haven't been able to successfully isolate the COVID-19 virus, so we don't know if it really exists, because they haven't been able to prove it. And then, the testing, itself is very flawed...resulting in many false positives and the method by which they are testing does not really make sense, scientifically...

"Koch's Postulates, which are meant to prove and...reproduce the effect of viruses have never been accomplished for any viruses - so, would that call into question viruses, themselves, their existence?

"And if that's the case, then how do you explain when people get sick, like when they catch the flu and they just feel like crap, I mean, we all thought it was viruses. What can you tell us?"

Dr Kaufman says it's true that Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied for the disease causation of any virus, which means that our ideas about viruses consist largely of dogma and are based on a scientific system that rewards this theory-based approach.

When asked about the bioweapons angle of this story, Dr Kaufman gives a surprising reply: "I'm sure there are Top Secret labs that are researching all kinds of weapons...but...if there's really no biological model for a virus to cause this disease, I'm not sure what they're engineering, exactly.

"I imagine that it would be extremely difficult to create some kind of biological organism that would cause disease, because most of the time when we have parasitic problems, they're opportunistic.

"They're there because there's something not right in our body and they're actually trying to help us get rid of that but in the process, they might get out of control and cause us problems. But I'm not aware of any organisms that some in and take over when you're healthy. So, I think that would be a really tall order and I'm not sure that it's even possible.

"But if they did want to make us sick, the easiest thing would be to put toxins into our bodies and there's many ways this can be done - and that has been done. For example, they're putting fluoride in our water supply, which is a known toxin to the central nervous system.

And even the CDC put out a guidance in the early 2000s, instructing parents of newborns not to use fluoridated water to mix baby formula, because it would affect the children's neurological development, right? Yet, they put it in our water. You can look at what happened in Michigan, with the lead pipes and the lead poisoning from the water...

"But getting back to the mortality figures, we haven't seen excess mortality, so if there's any strategy like this, I don't see evidence that it's been deployed. Now, am I concerned that it will be deployed in a second wave or a future part of this psychological operation? Yeah, I concerned about that."

As for the "Contact Tracing" programs, now hiring tens of thousands of workers, aiming to remove individuals from their homes to put them into a quarantine prison, Dr Kaufman says that the term, "Contact Tracing" was created in the 1931 and all of this has been in the planning stages for a long, long time and that it absolutely does represent an end to our freedom.

The Royal Academy of Sciences journal in May of 2019 dedicated the entire issue to managing a pandemic and methods of controlling the population, which is what "Contact Tracing" is for.

"So, they took the easy way to do this, because if they just come up with a completely fake illness and get everyone to volunteer to give up all their rights, it's much easier and much less risky than unleashing some kind poison on the population that would really make people sick and die - and that would also put themselves at risk. How would they make themselves invulnerable?

"In a sense, it's a kind of genius plot but it's a very sinister genius plot.
"[Contact Tracing] is the next step to further get us to volunteer to give up our rights and this time, it's mostly about privacy. And they may say that, initially, they're doing it for the public health but we don't really know what their real intention is and I don't think there's going to be transparency.

"There was a Contact Tracing app...it would give you a red light or a green light and that would be to let you into your office building or to use public transportation. So, these things, where we have freedom of movement, now we have to be granted a privilege based on this...

"One of the [Contact Tracing recruitment] ads that you showed, they were looking for people with military experience...they know how to knock down doors, they know how to look for evidence and trash places, they know how to intimidate people. That's what they're doing and their training and their experience in a military operation. So clearly, there's an intention to use these types of tactics with our own citizens."

All of this is covered in the 2010 Rockefeller "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" paper, under the heading of "Lock Step".

Spiro says, "It's beyond Orwellian...Under the guise of this pandemic, it could be used to achieve many goals...one of them...is disappearing dissidents. Remember, at the beginning of this outbreak, at the beginning of the year? We had see all these videos coming out of China...there were so many videos of men in full hazmat suits...dragging people out of their homes, literally kicking and screaming.

And if you look at who was filming those videos...they were *with* those dragging people from their homes. So, how did those videos get shared on social media, with the tight clampdown that China has? I think that there's a chance that they wanted the world to see those videos and to terrify people...and to normalize the idea."

Dr Kaufman says that if you want to know what the vaccine agenda is, it very easy to find out, you just need to read their Agenda 2030 documents.

"All of these measures are really voluntary...If we rely on the authorities to give us approval to exercise our freedoms, they're going to take more freedoms away, as they've been doing. So, while I respect people who want to go and protest at city hall or at the state capital, they are coming from the right point of view but they're just asking the authority figures, the government to give them permission, when they don't need permission from the government, they already have permission because they have inalienable rights.

"It's not really a decision for me it's just what I feel that I have to do to preserve a way of life and the way that I want to live, for me and for my children." "

[shaberon]

The F. B. I. (https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/report-fbi-serves-warrant-on-burr-in-investigation-of-stock-sale-during-coronavirus-outbreak/19097431/) has entered the house of Senator Burr and removed: a cellphone.

There is at least an investigation against insider trading, which did make one grit one's teeth in the early days, but, since then, seeing where several piles of hundreds of billions have gone in the U. S. and U. K., I doubt anyone will really ever have to answer for that.

I suppose the mask and glove companies--presumably lots of plastic petroleum stuff in there--will do rather well. At the same time, it is not too hard to find medical advice that wearing a mask is rather risky. Depletes blood oxygen to begin with. And you simply rebreathe anything you've got. That means it is even more risky to the vulnerable population already having diseases.

On the other hand it is impossible to prove it actually does anything. How can someone really say I am not sick because of this mask?

For its limited and specific applications, like surgery, I am sure it is a good idea, but foisting it on the general public just sounds like a racket.

[Ernie Nemeth]

There is an agenda.

What has happened is that the bureaucrats, non-wealth-building citizens who constantly need to justify their paychecks and crave authority as proof of their high status, have designed an unreasonable response to the mere hint of a pandemic.

Completely divorced from common sense, which is their trademark, they mean to contain an invisible and largely unproven menace by over-kill, regardless of the collateral damage.

In Canada alone, 35,000,000 people are required to shut down their lives for the sake of 5,000 people , the vast majority of which would have died anyway. That is bureaucratic over-reach at its finest. And our Prime Minister just okayed a grant of over $700,000,000 to the Gates Foundation to further their hunt for a vaccine.

This whirlwind activity surrounding an unproven threat is hijacking the narrative by skirting the facts and appealing to peoples' base instinct to survive. Logic and rationality has no place in such a scenario because they are locked in survival mode by the rhetoric spewing from the mouths of our so-called 'Leaders'.

Combine that with mass migration of peoples from impoverished regions of the world, and the agenda is quite clear: Mix first world with third world populations and take back the little previous generations have gained in terms of individuals rights and freedoms for the sake of 'safety and security'. Third world populations just want to work without fear of chaos and death, which is the way of life where most have come from. The trade off in terms of perceived safety, in their terrorized minds, is well worth the removal of some freedoms.

Now remove the last vestiges of normalcy from the fabric of society and the new rules can be implemented without challenge. That is where we are today, on the brink of the 'new normal'. Where the third world participants will sway the nations of the west to accept security of person at the price of personal freedom, which is what they were used to in their nations of origin.

The Western World was predicated upon the notion that to let the individual take their own path through life provides more incentive for wealth and prosperity than any government can by decree. It has been proven correct for centuries.

Unfortunately, the individual's freedom necessitated the free reign of very greedy and very bad men of nefarious intent. And through secret clubs and occulted information these bad guys have come to the brink of complete mastery of the globe!

That is the agenda.

[Hermoor]

The latest breaking news on planet Half-Wit....

http://nypost.com/2020/05/13/greta-thunberg-added-to-cnn-expert-covid-19-panel-twitter-erupts/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons

[shaberon]

There is an agenda.

What has happened is that the bureaucrats, non-wealth-building citizens who constantly need to justify their paychecks and crave authority as proof of their high status, have designed an unreasonable response to the mere hint of a pandemic.

Completely divorced from common sense, which is their trademark, they mean to contain an invisible and largely unproven menace by over-kill, regardless of the collateral damage.

In Canada alone, 35,000,000 people are required to shut down their lives for the sake of 5,000 people , the vast majority of which would have died anyway. That is bureaucratic over-reach at its finest. And our Prime Minister just okayed a grant of over $700,000,000 to the Gates Foundation to further their hunt for a vaccine.



Sounds like Canada needs to be stopped.

As for the money, probably no one will be held accountable.

Yes I think these reactions totally fold into the same standing agenda. As for this incident to have been the specific trigger, it seems to me there has simply been a search for a Black Swan that just wasn't going to happen in the Mid-east militarily. If I lean toward the view that the disease may have been natural and unplanned, it is just an opportunity or excuse for the largest heist ever and possibly the disposal of the petrodollar. I personally cannot crank out evidence that the disease was either intentionally released, or, intentionally produced, and that is not really necessary to show that a state of oppression "until a vaccine" is an agenda-driven manipulation.

It seems to me the basic artificial scare tactic is that The Virus "was" cancer on behalf of the fraudulent American Cancer Society until 1980 and then it "became" AIDS and all these subsequent versions until today.

The best I can say right now is that it looks like the WHO will allow Madagascar's tea into a clinical trial, but, it has already done this, rated second-best with 2005 SARS.

It is possible with more mounting evidence that the Emperor Has No Clothes, we might be able to toss some of the autocracy into the dustbin of history. I mean, if this turns into next to nothing that is proven can be prevented or cured basically by an organic lifestyle, and everyone knows it, what would be the future of the likes of Gates?

It looks like Senator Burr (https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/burr-to-leave-top-senate-intelligence-post-amid-probe-of-stock-sales/19098180/) has a little "cookie jar" problem which has led to his leaving the Senate Intelligence Committee.

[Bo Atkinson]

Link below has a 36 minute embedded audio player.

Excerpt from long text:

Transcription: Was COVID-19 Genetically Engineered?

Was the Covid-19 pandemic from a genetically engineered virus or a natural one? I have amassed a bunch of information from various sources to report on what we know and it’s pretty damning.

I’m going to present evidence suggesting that the SARS CoV-2 was specifically genetically engineered according to some sources. Even the strains of natural viruses that were used as the basis, according to this hypothesis. We’re going to talk about the lab that is likely to have done the genetic engineering and a person who may have committed fraud to cover up the lab based origins of the virus. We’ll also talk about the current state of safety of genetically engineered viruses and those that are not genetically engineered, but currently being experimented with in laboratories around the world and how this presents us with the possibility of future pandemics, possibly with greater damage than this one, unless we make a change. We’re going to spend a lot of time on this and it’s actually quite an interesting story.
https://www.responsibletechnology.org/was-covid-19-genetically-engineered/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=60eff356-1e26-481e-9b44-7a7513e0b847

[Patient]

There is an agenda.

What has happened is that the bureaucrats, non-wealth-building citizens who constantly need to justify their paychecks and crave authority as proof of their high status, have designed an unreasonable response to the mere hint of a pandemic.

Completely divorced from common sense, which is their trademark, they mean to contain an invisible and largely unproven menace by over-kill, regardless of the collateral damage.

In Canada alone, 35,000,000 people are required to shut down their lives for the sake of 5,000 people , the vast majority of which would have died anyway. That is bureaucratic over-reach at its finest. And our Prime Minister just okayed a grant of over $700,000,000 to the Gates Foundation to further their hunt for a vaccine.

This whirlwind activity surrounding an unproven threat is hijacking the narrative by skirting the facts and appealing to peoples' base instinct to survive. Logic and rationality has no place in such a scenario because they are locked in survival mode by the rhetoric spewing from the mouths of our so-called 'Leaders'.

Combine that with mass migration of peoples from impoverished regions of the world, and the agenda is quite clear: Mix first world with third world populations and take back the little previous generations have gained in terms of individuals rights and freedoms for the sake of 'safety and security'. Third world populations just want to work without fear of chaos and death, which is the way of life where most have come from. The trade off in terms of perceived safety, in their terrorized minds, is well worth the removal of some freedoms.

Now remove the last vestiges of normalcy from the fabric of society and the new rules can be implemented without challenge. That is where we are today, on the brink of the 'new normal'. Where the third world participants will sway the nations of the west to accept security of person at the price of personal freedom, which is what they were used to in their nations of origin.

The Western World was predicated upon the notion that to let the individual take their own path through life provides more incentive for wealth and prosperity than any government can by decree. It has been proven correct for centuries.

Unfortunately, the individual's freedom necessitated the free reign of very greedy and very bad men of nefarious intent. And through secret clubs and occulted information these bad guys have come to the brink of complete mastery of the globe!

That is the agenda.

Hey Ernie! I went onto the CBC website today and with only a hint of "..asking people to do the research themselves to find out the truth." I was quickly shut down.

It seems that I can't even get back into the comments section from the same laptop.

Not the Canada I remember from growing up. Trudeau is the real virus I think.

[greybeard]

VICTORY - Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci & Big Pharma lost a Massive Supreme Court Case in USA


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JG5b8Qt_CY

[Ernie Nemeth]

Not the Canada I remember from growing up.

Same here. But what I've come to realize is that this is not my country. It is the globalist's fascist safe-haven: A giant corporate hegemony where the rule of law is set by big business and global interests.

Sad but true. I am a sovereign without a nation...

[Luke Holiday]

Amazing? I am sure it is just coincidence....

https://rense.com/general96/5G-Covid.php

[Gwin Ru]

Bizarre EU Funded Comic Book Predicted Pandemic, With Globalists As Saviours (https://www.infowars.com/bizarre-eu-funded-comic-book-predicted-pandemic-with-globalists-as-saviours/)

Eerie 2012 document painted eurocrats as saving the planet from a killer virus and draconian lockdowns

Steve Watson | Infowars.com - May 15, 2020

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/comic.png (https://www.infowars.com/bizarre-eu-funded-comic-book-predicted-pandemic-with-globalists-as-saviours/)
Image Credits: Screenshot (https://www.infowars.com/bizarre-eu-funded-comic-book-predicted-pandemic-with-globalists-as-saviours/).


A strange comic book that was commissioned for publication by the European Union (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d) in 2012 eerily predicted almost exactly what has unfolded with the Covid-19 global pandemic. However, in this propaganda laced presentation of the outbreak, unelected globalist bureaucrats save the planet.

The comic book, titled ‘Infected’, was a production of the European Commission’s international cooperation and development arm. It was not intended for widespread public consumption, but instead to be distributed inside EU institutions. Only a few hundred of the comic books were made.

The EU’s description of the strange publication states that “While the story may be fictional, it is nevertheless intertwined with some factual information.”

The graphic novel depicts scientists inside a lab in China experimenting with deadly pathogens:

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/cartoon3.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)

A wannabe hero time travels from the future, alerting authorities to the coming pandemic, and presents an antidote, before quickly becoming the target of opportunists who want to steal the cure and sell it to drug companies:

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/cartoon4.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


The story features the transmission of a novel virus from animals to humans in a crowded wet market:


https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/Screenshot-2020-05-15-at-10.44.03.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


“Indeed, imagine if you were infected in this market by a new contagious agent.” says the UN’s chief advisor on contagious diseases, adding “You probably wouldn’t even realise it until the end of the incubation period.”

The publication suggests that air travel would exacerbate the spread of the disease, with the character adding that “You’d have headed back to Europe, the US, Latin America, or Australia as planned via an international airport.”

The cartoon depicts the failure of a global health organisation to act quickly enough to stop a pandemic:


https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/cartoon.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


It also predicts draconian safety measures, including social distancing, which make everyday life “totally unbearable”:

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/caartoon1.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


The piece concludes with an EU Parliament hearing, in which Brussels pushes for more integrated European cooperation on global health matters, mirroring a real life initiative known as ‘One health’. (https://onehealthejp.eu)

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/cartoon1.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


The globalists are lauded for helping develop and distribute a vaccine to the world:

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/Screenshot-2020-05-15-at-10.57.08.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)



https://assets.infowars.com/2020/05/Screenshot-2020-05-15-at-10.57.28.png
Photo: Europa.eu (Fair use) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cc2ea93-d003-417e-9294-1103a6ee877d)


Was this predictive programming or just a bizarre coincidence?

In 2020, in reality, the EU has pandered to China, and bowed to censorship (https://summit.news/2020/05/08/eu-defends-bowing-to-communist-chinese-censors/) regarding the virus outbreak.

The EU has also been heavily criticised by member states and insiders for monumental failings owing to internal bureaucracy (https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-europe-failed-the-test/). The EU’s science chief even resigned (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-eu-science-chief-resigns-mauro-ferrari-covid-19-a9454551.html) due to the inept coronavirus response (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52311263) from the institution.

In the Eurocrats’ own fiction, globalism saves the planet. In reality, it ends in mass death and global tyranny.

[Tintin]

UPDATE in red - thanks Tintin

Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine
45,510 views•May 10, 2020
Spiro Skouras
61.9K subscribers

"In this powerful interview Spiro is joined with Doctor Andrew Kaufman. Spiro and Dr. Kaufman discuss the expanding curtailment of basic civil liberties being normalized under the false pretext of a global health emergency.

Doctor Kaufman lays his reputation and his career on the line as he blows the whistle, on what he describes as a manufactured crisis to carry out a preplanned agenda to facilitate global governance and population control.

Doctor Kaufman is a well educated medical professional who convincingly illustrates, using the CDC's own technical data, how the public has been manipulated on the grandest scale.



Moderator Note from Tintin @19:09GMT May 15th 2020: not for the first time Youtube has removed the video attached to the original link, that I have now replaced with this one - below - from altcensored.com. A gentle reminder to everyone when it comes to posting links to videos on Youtube: download them wherever possible and wetransfer them to us if you can't otherwise provide links to them, or find alternative other sites to link to. There is, and has been for a while, as you must all surely know by now, a major purge going on. I'll get this into the Avalon Library just as soon as that's back up and running. In the meantime this is downloadable by clicking on the 'three dots' set to right bottom on the frame via the below link, or via the embedded film. Kia ora, Tintin.

Dr Andrew Kaufman joins Spiro Skouras

Dr Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID 19 Vaccine

https://altcensored.com/watch?v=XNGk22-91HY

https://archive.org/download/youtube-XNGk22-91HY/Dr_Andrew_Kaufman_They_Want_To_Genetically_Modify_Us_With_The_COVID_19_Vaccine-XNGk22-91HY.mkv

***********************************************************************************************

[Tintin]

The following posts were made on the 'statistics' thread and do overlap more than sufficiently with this thread.

Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355515&viewfull=1#post1355515
Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355875&viewfull=1#post1355875
Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355991&viewfull=1#post1355991
Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1356008&viewfull=1#post1356008

****



"Global vaccination market revenue worldwide is projected to reach $59.2 billion by 2020; this number may well increase with the arrival of Covid–19.

The British Government’s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must, again, raise the issue of conflicts of interest. To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population? Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations, and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future."

*****

Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?

Vanessa Beeley for Off Guardian (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/09/who-controls-the-british-government-response-to-covid-19/) May 9th, 2020

https://www.ukcolumn.org/sites/default/files/bill-and-boris_0.jpg



"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants” - Albert Camus


As Britain hurtles headlong towards neo-feudalist governance with heightened surveillance, micro-management of society and an uptick in fascistic policing of the draconian measures imposed to combat the “threat” of Covid–19, it is perhaps time to analyse the real forces behind this “new normal”.

There is now serious doubt over the correlation between lockdown and saving lives. Reality is creeping into the Covid–19 dialogue.

It is becoming apparent that people are getting sick because they are being isolated and effectively living under house arrest, condemned as “murderers” if they so much as think about breaking curfew, being snitched on by neighbours for “gathering” more than two people together in their back gardens.

The following graph was produced by UK Column and demonstrates the lack of correlation between lockdown and “saving lives”:

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/noon-lockdown-v-lockdown.jpg?x34803

The numbers game is acting in many instances as a smokescreen. It is impossible to rely upon “official” statistics, that vary wildly from one website to another: statistics that rely upon unreliable and sporadic testing procedures. and based upon death certificates that misrepresent the actual cause of death as Covid–19, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions.

Statistics, too, that were set in stone very early on in the development stages, when the perspective was limited and compressed, before a true picture could be seen. The newly emerging statistics (https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/#latest) are now increasingly undermining initial conclusions and pointing to the futility and negative consequences of lockdown.

1251264026274906112

It is now accepted that there is a high mortality rate among the elderly in care homes (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/uk-care-home-covid-19-deaths-may-be-five-times-government-estimate) in the UK and globally (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/16/italian-police-broaden-care-home-coronavirus-milan) — among the same elderly civilians who are being “asked” to sign DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate) forms.

This amounts to signing their own death warrant, should they present any of the Covid–19 symptoms. They will be neglected, isolated from their families when at their most vulnerable and left alone to die, even though it is possible that they have not contracted the virus.

1250702443723120642

Instead of offering proactive and positive suggestions that will enable our immune systems to combat the disease, the British Government is ensuring conditions that will suppress immune systems to dangerous levels and create the perfect environment for Covid–19 to flourish.

Britain has now received an estimated 1.4 million new benefit claims for welfare payments (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-benefits/uk-new-welfare-benefit-claims-soar-to-1-4-million-minister-says-idUSKCN21W0L5), “about seven times the normal level”. The government has pledged to bail out “80% of pay of workers who are temporarily laid off” but I have personally spoken to self-employed individuals who find themselves falling between the cracks that qualify them for financial support and now face an indefinite period of time without income.

These measures are being imposed in a country that, since 2012, has seen an exponential growth in child poverty to potentially sub-Victorian levels.

In March 2019 (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/child-poverty-absolute-uk-housing-crisis-costs-austerity-conservatives-a8843381.html), the number of children living in “absolute poverty” grew by a staggering 200,000 in a twelve-month period, to a total of 3.7 million. How will this number be further impacted by lockdown?

How did we arrive at this point? Who steered the UK Government towards this questionable and alarmist lockdown policy?

The unexamined assumption is that conclusions were formed on the basis of sound epidemiological analysis and research by doctors and scientists who care about our welfare.

The reality is what we will examine in this article. Neil Ferguson, a professor at Imperial College, was responsible for the modelling of a response to Covid–19. His virtual model was recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and it passed through into policy with virtually no scrutiny.

Ferguson’s dramatic prediction of 500,000 deaths in the UK became the foundation of Boris Johnson’s U-turn (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/retired-chief-eu-epidemiologist-how-long-can-you-keep-lockdown-democracy) from herd immunity to collective quarantine.

While some understood that Ferguson later reduced his mortality calculations, he actually doubled down on his projections on Twitter (https://twitter.com/neil_ferguson/status/1243294815200124928), insisting that without drastic lockdown measures being taken, the numbers would be even higher.

Who is Neil Ferguson?

Ferguson is acting director of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/neil.ferguson), which is based at Imperial College in London. According to Ferguson’s biography on the website, “much of [his] work is applied, informing disease control policy-making by public and global health institutions.”

The professor who derailed Johnson’s semblance of “herd immunity” strategy is no stranger to controversy and is described as having a “patchy” record of modelling pandemics (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8164121/Professor-predicted-500-000-Britons-die-coronavirus-accused-having-patchy-record.html) by one of his academic peers, Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University, an expert in animal diseases.

Ferguson was instrumental in the modelling of the British Government’s response to Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in 2001, which Thrusfield describes as “not fit for purpose” (2006) and “seriously flawed” (2012).

Thrusfield has highlighted the limitations of Ferguson’s mathematical modelling methods, and applied the doubts he expressed over FMD to the current Covid–19 “crisis” response.

An estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of Ferguson’s 2001 initiative. The farming community was devastated by suicides and bankruptcies that irretrievably altered the landscape of British agriculture — forcing healthy smallholdings into agri-corporate mergers and empowering the EU central governance in the agricultural sector.

Insight: Slaughtered on Suspicion, a documentary made by UK Column in 2015 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9iaDoXJF8), provides a shocking insight into the suffering precipitated by Ferguson’s model and the “new normal” imposed upon Britain’s farming community. The following is a statement made by one of the contributors to the programme:



"12,000,000 animals [Meat & Livestock Commission statistic] were slaughtered but that did not include lambs at foot, aborted lambs, calves or piglets. Further, tens of thousands of chickens were slaughtered in the early months — on welfare grounds, apparently. 88% of all animals slaughtered had not contracted FMD
[source: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs].

Great Orton airfield was used to slaughter sheep under the “voluntary” cull: that was anything but voluntary, and farmers not participating were ruthlessly threatened. There was only one mild case of FMD recorded from the thousands of blood tests done at Great Orton
[source: DEFRA].

There was a travelator that ran from the slaughter tent at Great Orton to the graves. This ran 16 hours a day, transporting “dead” young lambs. Slaughtermen working there told me that many of the lambs were buried alive.

The man that advised Blair during this fiasco was, as many will know, Prof. Ferguson of Imperial College. He was [reportedly] sacked by DEFRA late on during the epidemic, but the damage had been done! Prof Ferguson was awarded an OBE in 2002 for his work during FMD 2001.”
[Emphasis added]

In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, better known as “mad cow disease”, increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep.

The reality is:



Since 1990, 178 people in the United Kingdom have died from vCJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh (https://med.uth.edu/blog/2017/01/05/new-research-could-lead-to-blood-test-to-detect-creutzfeldt-jakob-disease/).” [2017]


In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/30/birdflu.jamessturcke) by bird-flu or H5N1.

By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus (https://www.prb.org/avian-flu-and-influenza-pandemics/), out of 147 reported cases.

In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the government (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/six-questions-that-neil-ferguson-should-be-asked) that swine flu or H1N1 would probably ]kill 65,000 people in the UK

In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK.

Now, in 2020, Ferguson and Imperial College have released a report which claims that half a million Britons and 2.2 million Americans may be killed by Covid–19.

The report has still not been peer-reviewed; despite this and Ferguson’s glaring record of mathematical sensationalism, the British Government has adopted the devastating socio-economic lockdown that Ferguson has proposed.

WHY IS THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT SO QUICK TO FOLLOW FERGUSON’S PLAN?

1. GAVI and Imperial College
The VIMC is hosted by the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College. VIMC is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and by “GAVI, the vaccine alliance” (GAVI’s own title for itself).

Bill and Melinda Gates began funding Imperial College in 2006, four years before the Gates Foundation launched the Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration (GHLLDVC) (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Global-Health-Leaders-Launch-Decade-of-Vaccines-Collaboration) and one year after Ferguson had demonstrated his penchant for overblown projections on mortality numbers from H5N1.

Up to the end of 2018, the Gates Foundation has sponsored Imperial College (https://donations.vipulnaik.com/donee.php?donee=Imperial+College+London) with a whopping $185 million.

That makes Gates the second-largest sponsor, beaten to the top spot on the podium by the Wellcome Trust, a British research charity which began funding (https://donations.vipulnaik.com/donee.php?donee=Imperial+College+London) Imperial College prior to Ferguson’s FMD débâcle and which, by the end of 2018, had already provided Imperial with over $400 million in funding. I will examine the Wellcome Trust’s connections in part two of this series.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Wellcome-trust.jpg?x34803


Wellcome trust also has a focus on global immunization programmes.

The Gates Foundation established the GHLLDVC in collaboration with the WHO, UNICEF and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The following is taken from the Gates Foundation website (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Global-Health-Leaders-Launch-Decade-of-Vaccines-Collaboration):



The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups – national governments, multilateral organizations, civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy, resource, and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines.

The Collaboration’s leadership council (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Global-Health-Leaders-Launch-Decade-of-Vaccines-Collaboration) at the time included the Director-General of the WHO, the Director of NIAID, the Director of UNICEF, the President of Gates Foundation Global Health, and the Chair of the African Malaria Alliance.

The steering committee included the Director of Immunisation, the UK Department of Health, and many other representatives from the WHO, UNICEF and associated organisations. It is a cluster of immunisation-focused individuals controlling the policy of world health governing bodies, who claim to be neutral.

The WHO was nominated as the “directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system” and was set up to be responsible for “shaping the health research agenda”, among other tasks linked to the policy of global immunisation.

UNICEF, the “world’s largest provider of vaccines for developing countries” has on-the-ground access to children in over 150 territories and countries (2010).

We are already seeing the potential for some serious conflict of interest behind the Ferguson model on Covid–19, and this will become even more apparent as the connections are now made to an entire pharmaceutical complex potentially protecting its own interests over any genuine concerns for the health and welfare of global populations.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/GAVI-partners.jpg?x73685

GAVI is funded and partnered by the same network that forms the GHLLDVC, with some noticeable additions: the World Bank and donor/implementing country governments. The Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor, but is topped by the British Government, which was instrumental in creating GAVI and is its largest donor.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/GAVI-UK-DONOR.jpg?x73685

While many sectors of British society have seen their living standards plummet, with the elderly severely neglected, a National Health Service in decline and homelessness on the increase, the British Government, via UKAID, has pledged £1.44 billion to GAVI for 2016–2020 and will be hosting the 2020 GAVI (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-host-gavi-pledging-conference-in-2020) pledging conference, which is due to take place in June 2020 to [emphasis added]:


"...mobilise at least US$ 7.4 billion (https://www.gavi.org/investing-gavi/resource-mobilisation-process/gavis-3rd-donor-pledging-conference-june-2020) in additional resources to protect the next generation with vaccines, reduce disease inequality and create a healthier, safer and more prosperous world.”

The conference promises to bring together political leaders, civil society, public and private donors, vaccine manufacturers and governments to support GAVI, the vaccine alliance — which boasts that it has “helped vaccinate almost half the world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases”.

This claim will be met with praise from the pro-vaccine lobby but concerns over the efficacy and safety of these mass vaccination programmes must be taken into account (https://www.globalresearch.ca/uncovering-the-cover-up-scientific-analysis-of-the-vaccine-autism-connection-deeply-flawed-vaccine-policies/5491987), particularly when being tested in poorer, developing countries.

Global vaccination market revenue worldwide (https://www.pharmaceuticalprocessingworld.com/global-vaccine-market-revenue-to-reach-59-2-billion-by-2020/) is projected to reach $59.2 billion by 2020; this number may well increase with the arrival of Covid–19.

The British Government’s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must, again, raise the issue of conflicts of interest. To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population? Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations, and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/GAVI-Bill-Gates.jpg?x73685

The GAVI replenishment conference is to be hosted by a British Government whose lockdown policy is effectively shattering the domestic economy and is collectively punishing the most vulnerable in British society.

When Bill Gates partnered with GAVI twenty years ago, he had been considering where next to focus his philanthropy and was “increasingly focusing on the power and potential of vaccines”.

It was Gates’ substantial sponsorship that launched GAVI, and ten years later Gates launched his own “vaccine decade” plan for the 2010s.

The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) 2012–2020, endorsed by the 194 member states participating in the World Health Assembly (2012), is led by the same members of the Gates “vaccine decade” consortium, promoted by the WHO (https://www.who.int/immunization/global_vaccine_action_plan/GVAP_doc_2011_2020/en/), and brings together governments, elected officials, health professionals, academia, manufacturers, global agencies, research and development, civil society, media and the private sector — to promote global immunisation.

This is a profit-driven corporate complex harnessing the “humanitarian” sector to lend credence to the claims of philanthropy, or more realistically, philanthrocapitalism.

[continued....]

****

Yb9iaDoXJF8

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?
Vanessa Beeley for Off Guardian May 9th, 2020

[continued from this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355515&viewfull=1#post1355515)]

******

2. GAVI and ID2020

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/GAVI.jpg?x73685

A glance at the partner page of the GAVI website reveals that not only is GAVI heavily invested in immunisation campaigns, it is also closely connected to the Gates, Microsoft and Rockefeller Foundation seed-funded ID2020 project (Digital Identity Alliance), which incorporates Accenture, Microsoft (Gates), Ideo-Org and Rockefeller Foundation into the GAVI alliance, all with ties to the ID2020 initiative.

ID2020 is promoting the concept that there is a need for universal biometric verification, because “to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right,” as asserted on the ID2020 website.

An article by journalist Kurt Nimmo for Global Research (https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-perfect-cover-for-mandatory-biometric-id/5709146) dismantles the “humanitarian” alibi for tyranny.

OffGrid Healthcare (https://eclinik.net/id2020-alliance-global-mandatory-vaccinations-biometric-id-integration/) explains:



What they really want is a fully standardized data collection and retrieval format, and cross-border sharing of identities of the entire population of the planet, in order for the stand-alone AI-powered command center to work without a hitch, and for purposes of calculating everyone’s potential contribution, and threat to the system.

Nimmo describes the potential for Covid–19 to be used as cover for mandatory biometric ID. An April article carried by Reuters confirms the suspicion that biometric ID might soon be introduced, ostensibly to “help verify those who already had the infection and ensure the vulnerable get the vaccine when it is launched”. This may sound perfectly sensible to those who are buying the government strap-lines on Covid–19 but — as Nimmo warns us — “COVID–19 is the perfect Trojan horse for a control freak state itching to not only micromanage the lives of ordinary citizens but also ferret out critics and potential adversaries and punish them as enemies of the state.”

Prashant Yadav (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-tech/biometric-ids-can-be-gamechanger-in-coronavirus-antibody-tests-vaccine-idUSL8N2BV0BI), senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development, has said [Emphasis added]:



"Biometric IDs can be a gamechanger. They can help governments target population segments e.g healthcare professionals or the elderly population, verify people who have received vaccination, and have a clear record."


Such statements can easily be interpreted as the harbingers of mandatory vaccination and the inclusion of biometric ID in the “humanitarian” package.

Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Technologies (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/conspiracy/are-the-planning-id2020-as-mandatory-implants-for-all-as-the-solution-to-the-crisis/) introduces an even more sinister projection into the mix.

Armstrong talks about a digital certificate that verifies you have been vaccinated, developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Microsoft, which will merge with ID2020. Covid–19 will be exploited to encourage us to accept digital implants and tracking devices that will enable authorities to keep an eye on us.

Armstrong argues that just as 9/11 conditioned us to accept X-ray booths at airports, now we will be chipped alongside our dogs and cats.

At this point, it is worth remembering that UKAID is heavily involved in GAVI, and one presumes they are on board with the digital ID2020 project.

Rob Laurence (https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-laurence-a5b50013/?originalSubdomain=uk), director at UK-based Innovate Identity, presented proposals for the future of digital identity back in June 2019 (http://www.innovateidentity.com/the-road-to-2020-the-future-for-digital-identity-in-the-uk/). The UK Government Verify scheme (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify/introducing-govuk-verify) was identified as a fledgling version of the future of digital ID.

Laurence describes the digital ID “ecosystem” that is emerging: Oliver Dowden, Minister for Implementation at the Cabinet Office (the British Government’s co-ordinating department), will form a new Digital ID Unit to “pave the way for the government to consume digital identities from the private sector”.

Laurence describes 2020 as the “now-or-never year for government and industry to collaborate” in the creation of an “interoperable digital identity market”.

Covid19 provides the opportunity that might just fulfil these predictions.

It is no coincidence that a British start-up — Microsoft-funded Onfido (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/04/15/british-ai-startup-onfido-secures-100m-boost-tech-immunity-passports/) — has recently raised $100 million to “boost its ID technology” to enable the creation of “immunity passports” for governments “battling coronavirus”.

In December 2019, researchers at MIT created a: “microneedle platform (https://www.genengnews.com/topics/drug-discovery/quantum-dots-deliver-vaccines-and-invisibly-encode-vaccination-history-in-skin/) using fluorescent microparticles called quantum dots (QD) which can deliver vaccines and at the same time, invisibly encode vaccination history in the skin”: the QDs can be detected by specially adapted smartphones.

The “new normal” will mean we are tracked and monitored by our own communication systems to an even greater and more intrusive extent.

THE FUTURE IS BEING MODELLED — BUT NOT FOR OUR BENEFIT
In part one of this two=part series, my intention has been to raise questions over who is driving the British Government response to Covid–19. Those who have influenced the lockdown policy have very clear conflict of interest question marks over their agenda.

The scientific clique (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8188041/Ministers-accused-treating-Doomsday-scientist-like-demigod.html) influencing government decisions is one that is incorporated into a for-profit Big Pharma industrial network which will, undeniably, benefit from the measures being taken by the British Government — a government that is financially embedded in the same complex.

Why are the views of epidemiologists, doctors, scientists, analysts and health advisors who challenge the lockdown being ignored or censored by the media and by government? Why is the government not widening the circle of advisors to take into account these opposing perspectives that might bring an end to the misery that is a consequence of enforced quarantine?

Off-Guardian has recorded these views here (https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/), here (https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/17/8-more-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/) and here (https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/). It is also worth following Swiss Propaganda Research (https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/#latest) for regular updates on emerging analysis and statistics that you will not always find in the mainstream media.

World Economic Forum report on the psychological experiment that is the Covid19 lockdown.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/this-is-the-psychological-side-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-that-were-ignoring/?fbclid=IwAR0NgSFAkHG-2_MWR33RGrplhmcbHnpOYz1pf8UTjH0sE1pmLyPuNE-j954

Instead, the British Government is effectively endorsing the breeding of distrust in society, the erosion of public assembly, the isolation and state-sanctioned euthanasia of the elderly, the emerging police state, snitch lines, loss of dignity and livelihoods, greater dependency upon the state for survival, depression, suicide and voluntary incarceration.

An article in New York Times reports on the death toll in care homes which “reflect a global phenomenon” in a world under lockdown.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/world/canada/montreal-nursing-homes-coronavirus.html

The UN has issued a warning that the economic downturn could “kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020”.

Gates, the WHO, the British Government and UNICEF are focused on global immunisation for a “pandemic” that is not living up to the alarmist virtual projections sponsored by Gates and the Big Pharma complex, while children really will start to die from malnutrition, neglect and a myriad of consequence of extreme poverty generated by the “steepest downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s” (IMF).

1251404445344292864?s=19

In part two, I will delve deeper into the interlocking interests of state and private corporate sectors that should not be interfering in policies which affect the welfare of British citizens.

I will reveal how the same players are influencing the media response and ensuring that their interests are given the most powerful platforms to promote their agenda.

The questions must be asked: Who is really in charge of the Covid–19 response? Who benefits most? Who will suffer most from the long term consequences?

And who will provide respite from those consequences when the “pandemic” has disappeared from view?

Originally published by UK Column. This is part one of a two-part article. We’ll be running the second part tomorrow, or you can read it here (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown) already.

[Tintin]

COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown
By Vanessa Beeley
Source: UK Column (https://www.ukcolumn.org/print/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown) - May 11th 2020
Also published in Off-Guardian: https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/10/covid19-the-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown/


(Continued from this Post #280 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355515&viewfull=1#post1355515) and Post #281 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355518&viewfull=1#post1355518), and Post #290 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1355875&viewfull=1#post1355875))

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/CEPI-interim-board.jpg?x67792

Just as Sir Patrick Vallance was linked to GSK, so Chris Whitty, the UK Government's Chief Medical Advisor, was on the interim board of CEPI until the permanent board (https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-announces-new-permanent-board/) [34] was announced in 2018. Should we be surprised that the UK Government has invested £50 million in CEPI while being advised by Whitty (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/04/prof-chris-whitty-the-expert-we-need-in-the-coronavirus-crisis)?

Whitty also received (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/04/prof-chris-whitty-the-expert-we-need-in-the-coronavirus-crisis) [36] Gates funding in 2008: $40m for malaria research in Africa. The fact that Whitty was involved in the kick-start of CEPI, Gates' immunisation monopoly project, should therefore not come as a huge surprise.

CEPI and Imperial College partnership

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/CEPI-and-Imperial-College.jpg?x67792

Ferguson’s model was generated under the auspices of the Vaccine Modelling Impact Consortium (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-controls-british-government-response-covid19-part-one) [2], hosted by Imperial College — both effectively funded by Bill Gates and Britain's Wellcome Trust (primarily).

In December 2018 (https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/global-coalition-invests-imperial-college-london-s-rna-vaccine-platform-to-fight-disease-x), [37] CEPI went into partnership with Imperial College, London. CEPI provided funding of US$8.4 million for Imperial College to work on a vaccine platform that can be used to “rapidly develop vaccines against pathogens — even unknown ones”. The platform was appropriately named RapidVac and was focused on producing vaccines for H1N1, rabies and Marburg virus as “proof of concept”. The next step would be to develop vaccines rapidly in responses to “new and unknown pathogens, known as ‘Disease X’”. So, one year before the Covid–19 outbreak, Imperial College was working on a vaccine for “Disease X”.

An Imperial College statement (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189447/tailor-made-disease-vaccines-created-million-project/) [38] claimed that the partnership of CEPI and IC aimed to develop vaccines “against new and unknown pathogens within 16 weeks from identification of antigen to product release for trials” (emphasis added). This is an extraordinary claim, when vaccines have a typical R&D gestation period of up to fifteen years before being safely approved for public consumption. In addition, we must also always consider that there is a very strong argument (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8HfTo5ofYY&t=62s) [39] against the use of vaccines altogether; perhaps a subject for another article.

Development of Covid–19 vaccines

The genome sequence (https://sciencebusiness.net/covid-19/news/good-progress-being-made-towards-covid-19-vaccine-says-epidemic-response-group) [40] of Covid–19 was published online in mid-January and researchers reportedly sprang into action. The global quest for a vaccine excompasses some ten to fifteen serious programmes. CEPI is reportedly funding six of these programmes: CureVac, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Moderna, and the Universities of Oxford, Imperial College and Queensland in Australia. We can also now add GSK to the list of participants partnered with the UK Government-assisted CEPI.

GAVI and CEPI partnership, December 2018

In Part One, I discussed GAVI, the self-proclaimed vaccine alliance. GAVI was established twenty years ago and incorporates the members of the Gates Foundation “Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration” consortium: those include, once again, the WHO, the World Bank, UNICEF and governments. The UK Government is GAVI’s top sponsor (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-controls-british-government-response-covid19-part-one) [2]. In turn, GAVI sponsors the VIMC, where Ferguson models his response to Covid–19 — hosted by Imperial College.

In December 2018 (https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/coalition-epidemic-preparedness-innovation-turns-iffim-accelerate-funding-new) [41], the same month that CEPI went into partnership with Imperial College, the board of GAVI approved a proposal for the Kingdom of Norway to support CEPI through a bond scheme backed by a new Norwegian “pledge to the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (https://www.gavi.org/investing-gavi/innovative-financing/iffim) [42]” (IFFIm).

Utilising the bond scheme, Norway funded CEPI to the sum of US$58.1 million. Gates-funded, Gates-established GAVI was the broker for this sponsorship deal, which funnelled money to the Gates-funded, Gates-established CEPI. Other sponsors are clearly involved, but I am just making the point of the revolving-door policy in relation to these consortiums that bring together private, public and global health sectors to further vaccine promotion globally. As Gavi’s website proudly states [43], the alliance now vaccinates almost half of the world’s children.

The UK Government blurring the lines between private and public sector when it comes to vaccines

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/UK-Column.jpg?x67792

The UK Government not only funds Gates-generated projects indirectly through CEPI and GAVI; there is also a direct collaboration that is off the radar of most reporting on the government’s response to Covid–19. If you enter the search term “Bill Gates” as an implementing partner into the UKAID development tracker (https://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/search?query=Bill+Gates&includeClosed=0) [45], a number of vaccine-related projects are revealed.

This week, the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, co-hosted the virtual Coronavirus Global Response International Pledging Conference — to “drive forward the global race for coronavirus vaccines, treatments and tests” (emphasis added).

According to information published (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-its-humanity-against-the-virus) [46], the UK has already provided £744 million of UKAID for the global response to Covid–19. That includes £388 million in support for new vaccines, tests and treatments. The UK has pledged £250 million to CEPI (the biggest contribution of any country).

£40 million has gone to support rapid development of Covid–19 treatments; £23 million to develop rapid tests for the virus; and £75 million to the WHO critical health systems response. The UK has also pledged the equivalent of £330 million per year for five years to GAVI, the self-proclaimed vaccine alliance.

The UK Government is effectively focusing on the market sector it has most heavily invested in — global immunisation — at a time when the British domestic economy is being forced to its knees by the government response to Covid–19. [my emphasis - Tintin]

Perhaps at this stage, one might still argue that the UK Government has the welfare of its citizens at the forefront of its agenda; but delving a little deeper makes it much harder to draw that conclusion.

The UK Vaccine Network

Not only was Chris Whitty previously sponsored by Bill Gates and on the interim board of CEPI; he now chairs the UK Vaccine Network (https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/uk-vaccines-network) [47] (UK VN). The UK VN brings together “industry, academia and relevant funding bodies to make targeted investments in specific vaccines and vaccine technology for infectious diseases with the potential to cause an epidemic”.

The UK Vaccine Network provides funding for vaccine development programmes. Projects supported by the DHSC through the UK Vaccine Network are listed here (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/827983/projects-currently-being-funded-by-ukvn.pdf) [48].

[Tintin]

COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown
By Vanessa Beeley
Source: UK Column (https://www.ukcolumn.org/print/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown) - May 11th 2020
Also published in Off-Guardian: https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/10/covid19-the-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown/

The UK vaccine network - cont.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Imperial-college-vacc-funding.jpg?x67792

Under Chris Whitty’s administration — Whitty is co-lead for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) — the NIHR and UK Research and Innovation are giving another £20 million [49] to CEPI for Covid–19 vaccine development. This is in addition to the £50 million already given by the UK Government to CEPI.

“It’s Humanity versus the virus” follows World Immunisation Week (April 26th–30th)
The timing of Boris Johnson’s “humanity versus virus” conference is unlikely to be coincidental, following as it does hot on the heels of World Immunisation Week (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vaccine-update-issue-307-april-2020-world-immunization-week) [50].

A document produced by Public Health England (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882827/PHE_11652_VU_307_April_2020.pdf) [51] (PHE) provides a greater insight into how hard the UK Government is promoting vaccines during the Covid–19 “crisis”. The 2020 theme is “Vaccines work for all” — coinciding with the last year of the Gates “vaccine decade” of the 2010s.

Hashtags like #CarryOnVaccinating (https://twitter.com/hashtag/carryonvaccinating) [52] are being deployed, and the “vaccines work for all” campaign will focus on “how vaccines — and the people who develop, deliver and receive them — are heroes by working to protect the health of everyone, everywhere”.

The WHO has designated 2020 the International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife. Why? Because of those professions' “crucial role as early vaccine champions for new parents and parents-to-be and life course vaccination, making sure older adults have their routine protection”. What a clever way to harness the genuinely dedicated nursing staff to promote vaccines to a huge market sector.

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Vaccine-promotion.jpg?x67792

The outsourcing of vaccine promotion continues. There are social media memes prepared earlier that can be uploaded and shared to Facebook, Instagram and Twitter by an unsuspecting public, who will thus advertise global immunity for free.

1255908325906173953

The language of the report is sinister in its behavioural nudging: [my emphasis - Tintin]

“Last year, WHO declared vaccine hesitancy among the top ten threats to global health”.

A civilian population in lockdown — desperate to stimulate the economy, to return to work and to avoid being infected with “Pandemic 1 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tX7qZ5lRPs&feature=youtu.be)” — will be easily gaslighted by such a lexicon into accepting anything that will address the concerns that have been imprinted into their subconscious.

The document details the need to “counter the infodemic”, i.e. expert opinion that does not comply with the Big Pharma/WHO diktats:

If you are looking for information about vaccines, be sure to consult trusted and credible sources, like your health worker, local health authorities, health institutions like NHS.UK, Public Health England, WHO or the members of the Vaccine Safety Net.

1254364437982699523

[Sub-editorial: Charles Shoebridge (@ShoebridgeC) is as per his Twitter profile a former army officer, Scotland Yard detective and counter terrorism intelligence officer, international politics graduate, lawyer, broadcaster, writer. - Tintin Q]


We are, of course, already seeing this infodemic warfare in action: the YouTube CEO recently announced that YouTube would remove any video deemed to be in contravention of advice being given by the WHO. A recent statement from the Secretary-General of the UN, Antonio Guterres, reinforces the WHO recommendations. Guterres condemns (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_d8sNJ4o1g&feature=youtu.be) what he claims to be “a dangerous epidemic of misinformation”. Journalist and researcher Michael Swifte described the vaccine agenda as follows:

"The loving embrace of a vaccine administered by the biggest public-private partnership in history. This is what the Secretary General of the UN is promoting."

Reading through this PHE document is a veritable exercise in Behavioural Insights methodology: again, no coincidence, when one considers British expertise in “nudging” the public towards any given pre-determined agendas or decisions that benefit the ruling classes. This excellent article at UK Column (https://www.ukcolumn.org/print/article/behavioural-insights-second-team-leading-uk-governments-covid-19-response) provides a comprehensive analysis of the role played in the Covid–19 response by Behavioural Insights.

Public Health England — who are they, and how are they linked to Porton Biopharma?

According to one report (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-drug-development-to-transfer-to-new-state-owned-company), PHE exists to “protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities”. PHE is an “operationally autonomous executive agency, sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC)".

In June 2018, PHE transferred (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-drug-development-to-transfer-to-new-state-owned-company) its drug development to a new state-owned company, Porton Biopharma Ltd (https://www.portonbiopharma.com/) (PBL), which is wholly owned by Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Health (currently Matt Hancock). Perhaps unsurprisingly, PBL has the only UK-licensed anthrax vaccine among its portfolio. We are told that “the future success and revenue growth of PBL will provide PHE with an income dividend which will be ploughed back into the delivery of its priorities”. Once again, we see the revolving door between government agencies and private, for-profit sectors with a focus on vaccines.

Matt Hancock and UK Government commercial interests in Covid–19

1088390904858202112

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, is also owner of Porton Biopharma during his tenure; but that is not the only tie that Hancock appears to have to for-profit entities that stand to benefit from Covid–19 response strategies.

A recent report in the Byline Times (https://bylinetimes.com/2020/04/22/palantir-coronavirus-contract-did-not-go-to-competitive-tender/) detailed “highly controversial contracts” which will enable British ministers and senior health officials to “mine confidential data from tens of thousands of Covid–19 hospital patients”. These contracts have allegedly been awarded to technology companies “without being put out to competitive tender, NHS has disclosed”. Microsoft is included in those companies; that is, Bill Gates is present.

Babylon Health — the NHS is not for sale (!)

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Hancock-babylon-2018.jpg?x67792

Both Hancock and Dominic Cummings, chief adviser to the Prime Minister, have questionable ties to Babylon Health (https://www.babylonhealth.com/), a prominent health tech firm implementing AI. Cummings held an undisclosed consultancy job at this healthcare venture: a firm endorsed by the government and at the top of the list to receive a National Health Service (NHS) Fund cash injection of £250 million.

According to an article in The Bureau Investigates (https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-10-11/conflict-of-interest-questions-over-dominic-cummings-job-at-health-tech-firm-babylon), during 2018, Cummings “advised Babylon Health on its communications strategy and senior recruitment just months before its GP at Hand app was publicly backed by Matt Hancock.”

Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary (British opposition spokesman on health), condemned (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/30/matt-hancock-accused-of-breaching-code-over-gp-app-endorsement) the Cummings/Hancock connection to Babylon:


"The links between Dominic Cummings in the heart of Downing Street, the health secretary and this AI health firm are increasingly murky and highly irresponsible."

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Hancock-bablyon.jpg?x67792

In case anyone is in doubt over Hancock’s enthusiasm for the Babylon GP at Hand app, it is highly advisable to read this article (https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/12/04/rachel-clarke-why-matt-hancocks-promotion-of-babylon-worries-doctors/) published at the British Medical Journal (BMJ), written by Rachel Clark, a doctor specialising in palliative medicine:


Matt Hancock loves Babylon so much he doesn’t merely use its smartphone app, GP at Hand, he gushes enthusiasm for the product at every opportunity. First, at Expo, he name-checked Babylon, among others, as one of the “world’s best HealthTech companies.” Then he gave a speech eulogising the company while literally standing beneath its logos (http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/controversy_grows_around_gp_at_hand_service_after_ministers_endorsement_1252569) inside its London HQ. Then in comments to The Telegraph he declared a breathless vision for the “revolutionary” app to be “available for all (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/12/hancock-attacks-nhs-block-progress-says-patients-should-able/)".

And, last week he featured in a double-page, Babylon-sponsored puff piece in the Evening Standard entitled “Technology can be a great fixer for the NHS.” Its centrepiece was an interview proclaiming Hancock’s ringing endorsement of Babylon: he declared GP at Hand to be “a force for good within the NHS (https://www.standard.co.uk/futurelondon/health/matt-hancock-on-ai-and-the-nhs-a3998006.html)”.

Although this detail may appear to be an excursus away from the involvement of the UK Government Covid–19 health advisory board in the promotion of global vaccine programmes, it serves as a further demonstration of the blurring of lines between commercial interests and the welfare of citizens. [my emphasis - Tintin)

1253537596342325248

This relationship is highlighted in legendary journalist John Pilger’s latest documentary The Dirty War on the NHS (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZcXrc9_wk), a film I cannot recommend highly enough for its stark portrayal of the stealth privatisation of the NHS. Babylon Health was founded by former Goldman Sachs banker Ali Parsa, who also co-founded and acted as CEO of a private healthcare company, Circle — the first private business to operate an NHS hospital. That hospital was Hinchingbrooke (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/09/circle-patients-hinchingbrooke-sick-dream-impossible), which proved to be a disastrous enterprise.

Babylon and Bill Gates
Yes, Bill Gates has a connection to Babylon, too. In March 2020, Babylon’s Rwanda-focused virtual care subsidiary, Babyl (https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/europe/babylon-inks-10-year-partnership-rwandan-government), signed a ten-year partnership with the Rwandan government (https://bereanresearch.org/the-year-rwanda-goes-purpose-driven-un-begins-biometric-registration-of-citizens/) giving every citizen over the age of 12 access to digital health consultations. The project is heavily subsidised by the Rwandan government and the Bill Gates Foundation and promises (!) to “make health care affordable” for even the poorest communities. Again, we must ask to what degree these apps are serving as surveillance instruments for government agencies.

The alleged war criminal and President of Rwanda, Paul Kagame (https://www.globalresearch.ca/rwanda-under-the-repressive-government-of-paul-kagame-washingtons-proxy-police-state/5500388), and Bill Gates proclaim: “Every vaccine (https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/22/opinions/african-health-key-economic-growth-paul-kagame-bill-gates/index.html) is a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the African economy.”

Babylon and Covid–19

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Covid-care-assistant.jpg?x67792

Cue the Babylon Covid–19 Care Assistant app. The app provides a four step care programme to subscribers: information, symptom checker and live chat with healthcare experts, a care plan, and video consultation with a healthcare professional.

We are informed: “The app is free to download (https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/1259222/Coronavirus-Symptom-Checker-iPhone-Android-App-UK). Using the service is free in Birmingham and London through the NHS. However, users located elsewhere will have to sign up for pay-as-you-go or annual subscriptions to the service. Annual plans start from £149. One-off consultations can cost as much as £49 each time.”

Cummings and Hancock — tag team that pushed for lockdown while promoting vaccines


https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/dominic-cummings.jpg?x67792

Cummings is accused of pressuring Boris Johnson’s advisers to adopt a draconian lockdown policy to combat Covid–19. If this is true, it must raise the question, yet again, of how much the UK Government's policy is influenced by genuine medical expert opinion and how much by commercial, Big Pharma, interests and agendas — interests and agendas which are demonstrably also those of the UK Government.

Certainly, members of the scientific advisory committee “were shocked, concerned and worried for the impartiality of advice (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/26/attendees-of-sage-coronavirus-meetings-worried-by-presence-of-dominic-cummings)” after Cummings effectively gatecrashed the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergency (SAGE) meetings.

Just this week, Hancock warned (https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1277698/Matt-Hancock-COVID19-vaccine-anti-vaxxers-coronavirus-Health-Secretary-latest-news-update) that there has been "no greater demonstration in modern history" of a need for a vaccine. Previously, in September 2019, Hancock had stated that the government was looking seriously at mandatory vaccines (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/sep/29/government-seriously-considering-compulsory-vaccinations-matt-hancock) for state school pupils. Falling vaccination rates for children in the UK prompted Hancock to consider prohibiting self-determination among parents who do not agree with vaccination regimes.

The fact that Cummings used his influence to politicise the SAGE meetings, and that Hancock is not averse to using his influence to promote private sector businesses with links to the NHS, should alert us to the possibility that both individuals are exploiting Covid–19 to further the aims of those whom they are connected to and potentially profit from. Bill Gates takes pride of place at the heart of the advisory network that has introduced and maintained lockdown in the UK — a lockdown not to be relaxed “until a vaccine is available”.

Covid–19 is pushing us towards global health fascism

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/vaccine.jpg?x67792


"One of the questions I get asked the most these days is when the world will be able to go back to the way things were in December before the coronavirus pandemic. My answer is always the same: when we have an almost perfect drug to treat COVID–19, or when almost every person on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus." (Bill Gates — Gates Notes (https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine?WT.mc_id=20200430165003_COVID-19-vaccine_BG-TW&WT.tsrc=BGTW&linkId=87665522))


Covid–19 threatens an imminent “new normal” of global health tyranny and unprecedented government control and surveillance. The SAGE team was very likely derailed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XON2XeGDE6A&t=19m38s) by Cummings’ political agenda and undue influence that he brought to bear upon the committee, which should have remained impartial and science-focused.

The most influential members of the UK Government advisory team have demonstrated a blatant conflict of interest through their connections to the Bill Gates empire, but the British Government itself has invested heavily in the global immunisation concept that Gates is engineering (https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/the-gates-foundations-vaccination-activism) through all manner of public and private sector initiatives.

The WHO is the global health governing body and is heavily influenced and financed by Bill Gates. In January 2020, the WHO published its R&D blueprint (https://www.who.int/publications-detail/who-r-d-blueprint-novel-coronavirus-ncov-vaccine-prioritization-for-clinical-trials) prioritising novel Coronavirus vaccine clinical trials. The WHO's Working Group for Vaccine Prioritisation aimed in that blueprint to provide guidance and recommendations to vaccine developers and to identify candidates who could be considered for further development and evaluation.

The WHO is effectively a self-regulatory entity in charge of world health but with little public accountability, particularly where vaccines are concerned. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) (https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/communication/network/_gacvs/en/) was established by the WHO in 1999 to respond to vaccine safety issues of “potential global importance”.

Bill Gates is demanding indemnity (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/heres-why-bill-gates-wants-indemnity-are-you-willing-to-take-the-risk/) against lawsuits before he agrees to distribute vaccines. We are all being fast-tracked into a future where our medical self-determination is in serious jeopardy and where those who decide for us will, potentially, not be held accountable for any health-endangering side effects.

We have already seen the devastating consequences of mass immunisation during the H1N1 epidemic, with questionable Big Pharma transparency regarding risk, as found by those who were given a vaccination that left them brain damaged for life.

Experts in the field have warned against rushing through a Covid–19 vaccine, bearing in mind it can usually take up to fifteen years (https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-vaccine-how-long-will-it-take-to-develop/) of rigorous testing prior to approval. Any attempt to compress this process must carry risks. Dr Peter Hotez, Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters (https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-vaccine-quest-18-months-fauci-experts-flag-dangers-testing-2020-4?r=US&IR=T):


"I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general […] there is a risk of immune enhancement (https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218)."

In 2009, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg initiated the Committee of Inquiry into the WHO's role in H1N1 ('swine flu') held by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. In this recent interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrBuv6kq6Rc&feature=youtu.be), Wodarg describes Bill Gates as “crazy” to be attempting to shortcut research and development. Wodarg also talks about the “secret contracts” between states and Big Pharma that perhaps determine the trajectory of vaccine development.

The H1N1 vaccine travesty must serve as a warning against precipitous vaccine development motivated by lockdown cabin fever, when the lockdown itself is looking more and more likely to be orchestrated to achieve precisely this outcome.

At the same time, as the possibility of compulsory vaccination is under discussion, the government intends to roll out a surveillance apparatus that will ensure forever-control over an already politically weakened workforce pushed ever deeper into financial insecurity, first by austerity measures and now by Covid–19.

It is very important to push back against the emotional triggering that is being generated by the state-aligned media and agencies. The behavioural insight experts are working hard to nudge us towards dependency on the state — but we must not surrender our individual and collective independence. We must determine the drivers behind this “crisis”, identify the causes, and deal with the symptoms without succumbing to fear or panic. It is not easy; but our futures depend upon our ability to see what is really going on and to respond accordingly.

*****

References used in both articles:

Source URL: https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown
Links [1] https://www.ukcolumn.org/coronavirus
[2] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-controls-british-government-response-covid19-part-one
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/29/half-of-worlds-workers-at-immediate-risk-of-losing-livelihood-due-to-coronavirus
[4] https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-uk-in-talks-with-id-startups-over-immunity-passports-2020-4
[5] https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3021415934619066
[6] https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/15/onfido-the-ai-based-id-verification-platform-raises-100m-led-by-tpg/
[7] https://www.biometricupdate.com/202004/uk-immunity-passport-proposals-leverage-biometric-facial-recognition
[8] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/onfido
[9] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/yoti
[10] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/idnow
[11] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/idenfy
[12] http://www.ox.ac.uk/research/research-in-conversation/entrepreneurial-academics/husayn-kassai-and-onfido
[13] https://onfido.com/us/
[14] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/may/03/coronavirus-health-passports-for-uk-possible-in-months
[15] https://www.biometricupdate.com/202004/immunity-certificates-should-leverage-biometrics-to-alleviate-privacy-concerns-says-id2020s-executive-director
[16] https://www.globalresearch.ca/coronavirus-causes-effects-real-danger-agenda-id2020/5706153
[17] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9iaDoXJF8
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cYjjEB3Ev8&amp;feature=youtu.be
[19] https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-damaged-uk-victims-swine-flu-vaccine-get-60-million-compensation-1438572
20] https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/glaxosmithkline-fails-to-warn-pandemic-flu-vaccine-s-alarming-safety-signal-bmj-report
[21] https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/influenza/pandemic/h1n1_safety_assessing/narcolepsy_statement_Jul2011/en/
[22] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccine-risks-research-nhs-lockdown-pandemrix-adjuvant-a9470306.html
[23] https://twitter.com/uksciencechief/status/1255828316096991232 [24] https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/british-government-enlists-astrazeneca-bia-for-new-pandemic-vaccine-taskforce
[25] https://www.genengnews.com/news/astrazeneca-joins-u-of-oxford-and-spinout-to-develop-covid-19-vaccine/
[26] https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/gsk-links-with-cepi-to-develop-a-vaccine-for-the-2019-ncov-virus
[27] https://cepi.net/news_cepi/2-billion-required-to-develop-a-vaccine-against-the-covid-19-virus/
[28] https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/new-partnership-between-gsk-and-the-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-to-accelerate-research-into-vaccines-for-global-healthneeds/
[29] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/retired-chief-eu-epidemiologist-how-long-can-you-keep-lockdown-democracy
[30] https://www.aier.org/article/stand-up-for-your-rights-says-bio-statistican-knut-m-wittkowski/
[31] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0Q4naYOYDw
[32] https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/? utm_campaign=shareaholic&amp;utm_medium=facebook&amp;utm_source=socialnetwork&amp;fbclid=IwAR3S79hdIjN4mrU3i71O0 VGsyDngksPPGx664CzctEAJa1znf3WAC25OOVc
[33] https://flat.bio/story/154247/cepi-launches-3-accelerated-vaccine-development-pr/
[34] https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-announces-new-permanent-board/ [35] https://www.globalresearch.ca/after-the-lockdown-a-global-coronavirus-vaccination-program/5706547
[36] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/04/prof-chris-whitty-the-expert-we-need-in-the-coronavirus-crisis
[37] https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/global-coalition-invests-imperial-college-london-s-rna-vaccine-platform-to-fight-disease-x
[38] https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189447/tailor-made-disease-vaccines-created-million-project/
[39] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8HfTo5ofYY&amp;t=62s
[40] https://sciencebusiness.net/news/good-progress-being-made-towards-covid-19-vaccine-says-epidemic-response-group
[41] https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/coalition-epidemic-preparedness-innovation-turns-iffim-accelerate-funding-new
[42] https://www.gavi.org/investing/innovative-financing/iffim/
[43] https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/about
[44] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ29vgOpTQQ&amp;t=1205s [45] https://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/search?query=Bill+Gates&amp;includeClosed=0
[46] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-its-humanity-against-the-virus
[47] https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/uk-vaccines-network
[48] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/827983/projects-currently-being-funded-by-ukvn.pdf
[49] https://www.ukri.org/news/20-million-rapid-response-for-novel-coronavirus-research/
[50] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vaccine-update-issue-307-april-2020-world-immunization-week
[51] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882827/PHE_11652_VU_307_April_2020.pdf
[52] https://twitter.com/hashtag/carryonvaccinating
[53] https://twitter.com/VanessaBeeley/status/1255908325906173953 [54] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tX7qZ5lRPs&amp;feature=youtu.be
[55] https://twitter.com/ShoebridgeC/status/1254364437982699523
[56] https://youtu.be/1_d8sNJ4o1g
[57] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/behavioural-insights-second-team-leading-uk-governments-covid-19-response
[58] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-drug-development-to-transfer-to-new-state-owned-company
[59] http://www.portonbiopharma.com/
[60] https://twitter.com/MattHancock/status/1088390904858202112
[61] https://bylinetimes.com/2020/04/22/palantir-coronavirus-contract-did-not-go-to-competitive-tender/
[62] https://www.babylonhealth.com/
[63] https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-10-11/conflict-of-interest-questions-over-dominic-cummings-job-at-health-tech-firm-babylon [64] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/30/matt-hancock-accused-of-breaching-code-over-gp-app-endorsement
[65] https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/12/04/rachel-clarke-why-matt-hancocks-promotion-of-babylon-worries-doctors/
[66] https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/my-vision-for-a-more-tech-driven-nhs
[67] https://www.gponline.com/health-secretary-wants-loads-companies-follow-gp-hands-example/article/1492843
[68] http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/controversy_grows_around_gp_at_hand_service_after_ministers_endorsement_1252569
[69] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/12/hancock-attacks-nhs-block-progress-says-patients-should-able/
[70] https://www.standard.co.uk/futurelondon/health/matt-hancock-on-ai-and-the-nhs-a3998006.html
[71] https://twitter.com/johnpilger/status/1253537596342325248
[72] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZcXrc9_wk
[73] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/09/circle-patients-hinchingbrooke-sick-dream-impossible
[74] https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/europe/babylon-inks-10-year-partnership-rwandan-government
[75] https://bereanresearch.org/the-year-rwanda-goes-purpose-driven-un-begins-biometric-registration-of-citizens/
[76] https://www.globalresearch.ca/rwanda-under-the-repressive-government-of-paul-kagame-washingtons-proxy-police-state/5500388
[77] https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/22/opinions/african-health-key-economic-growth-paul-kagame-bill-gates/index.html
[78] https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/1259222/Coronavirus-Symptom-Checker-iPhone-Android-App-UK [79] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/26/attendees-of-sage-coronavirus-meetings-worried-by-presence-of-dominic-cummings
[80] https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1277698/Matt-Hancock-COVID19-vaccine-anti-vaxxers-coronavirus-Health-Secretary-latest-news-update
[81] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/sep/29/government-seriously-considering-compulsory-vaccinations-matt-hancock
[82] https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine?WT.mc_id=20200430165003_COVID-19-vaccine_BGTW&amp;WT.tsrc=BGTW&amp;linkId=87665522
[83] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XON2XeGDE6A&amp;t=19m38s [84] https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/the-gates-foundations-vaccination-activism
[85] https://www.who.int/publications-detail/who-r-d-blueprint-novel-coronavirus-ncov-vaccine-prioritization-for-clinical-trials
[86] https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/communication/network/_gacvs/en/
[87] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/heres-why-bill-gates-wants-indemnity-are-you-willing-to-take-the-risk/
[88] https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-vaccine-how-long-will-it-take-to-develop/
[89] https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-vaccine-quest-18-months-fauci-experts-flag-dangers-testing-2020-4
[90] https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218
[91] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrBuv6kq6Rc&amp;feature=youtu.be
[92] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharmaplayers-behind-uk-government-lockdown&amp;via=ukcolumn
[93] https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown
[94] https://www.ukcolumn.org/print/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown

[greybeard]

Tintin
You have researched very well --this is a professional job
Thanks Chris

[shaberon]

So let me get this right: the UK, which is supposed to be the worst-off in all of Europe, and the US, which is blatantly the worst off as is the case with most everything else, are progressing to Move 739 of the Opium War, since, if we are unfamiliar with Wellcome Trust, go back through it and there you are. This is very un-new except for the Silicon Valley stuff; the medications being a horrendous mix of opium, oil, and snake oil, a la John D. Rockefeller, or the first Rockefeller to start getting big by generic medical swindles right before oil started replacing everything and gasoline was a waste product until General Motors demolished the American trolley system.

The UK is a lot like the US, except they speak English there. Both have this bizarre habit of competing about how large a chunk of public resources can be squandered on things that a sane person would discard expediently. It's done with facades and silhouettes so that one does not initially believe one's public resources are simply being handed to someone who has received them before, but, if this does not stop, that is because it is an addiction.

I do not know if, in the UK, this is happening while your snake oil peddlers are facing massive lawsuits over opium and synthetic opium, but here, New York refuses to settle out of court. Why they would be embroiled in such regretful litigation at the same time as being, perhaps, the actual world origin of what turns out to be a true pestilence, almost entirely for them, is just because New York is so much more important than the rest of us, I am so lucky to be able to use it freely as a name, instead of Old York, like they have to say in English now, so everyone on the island will known this is new, it must be improved, you should really just buy ours instead of making your own, but you won't know that until throwing away eighteen million quadrillion quid and your entire great-great-great-great grandchildren's future on your own trial runs, which may score a whopping .74 on the new "I would like to scare you into buying this, please" scale, and when that American comes in at .77, you will know that Wellcome just has lots of money and an office.

This life has been an almost entire waste of time, except for what we have managed to contribute to important players.

Sadly, I would have to inform them that I do not know anybody who gives a toss about this virus. The only way I can really do that is if time rolls by and if we can produce evidence of healthy people who have not received any drugs that have not been invented yet. In the long run, it will have to be shown that you don't need that stuff in a way that a judge will listen to. A judge would be best, since addressing anything through legislature is a lot more people and room for objections, and, well, several of these laws are already passed and money spent.

[onawah]

(Dr. Kaufman's credentials haven't been posted on the forum as yet that I am aware of, and imho should be included, as they are most impressive, though not as impressive as his willingness to speak truth in spite of the consequences to him personally.
I hope he joins up with RFK Jr. and friends, as they would no doubt be able to offer him support.
The video accompanying this article is posted here by Tintin: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1356261&viewfull=1#post1356261)

From: Censored Dr. Kaufman: “They Want To Genetically Modify Us With COVID-19 Vaccine” – Loses his Job and Willing to go to Jail to Resist
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/censored-dr-kaufman-they-want-to-genetically-modify-us-with-covid-19-vaccine-loses-his-job-and-willing-to-go-to-jail-to-resist/

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/05/Dr.-Andrew-Kaufman.jpg

"Dr. Andrew Kaufman may be the most censored doctor in the U.S. right now. His videos are removed and censored from YouTube very quickly.

Dr. Kaufman is so intelligent, and so articulate, that the “mainstream” media and medical authorities obviously fear him and his message, and they are doing everything in their power to suppress him.

This video (below) he did with Spiro Skouras, for example, was immediately removed from YouTube, although Spiro’s other videos remain for the most part (for now).

Andrew Kaufman is a medical doctor. Here is his full bio from his website:

Andy Kaufman, M.D. is a natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed his psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology.

He has conducted and published original research and lectured, supervised, and mentored medical students, residents, and fellows in all psychiatric specialties. He has been qualified as an expert witness in local, state, and federal courts. He has held leadership positions in academic medicine and professional organizations. He ran a start-up company to develop a medical device he invented and patented.

Faculty Positions
Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University
Vice President, Psychiatry Faculty Practice Corporation, SUNY Upstate Medical University
Medical Director of Faculty Practice, SUNY Upstate Medical University
Assistant Director, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship, SUNY Upstate Medical University
Consulting Expert Witness, Syracuse University Law School
Education
Medical University of South Carolina, Doctor of Medicine
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, BS in Biology
Training
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Board Certification in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry (2011)
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Fellowship in Forensic Psychiatry
Duke University School of Medicine, Resident in Psychiatry
Publications
Knoll JL and Kaufman AR. Suicide in Correctional Settings: Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Prevention. Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry edited by Richard Rosner, 3rd edition, 2017.
Way BB, Kaufman AR, Knoll JL, Chlebowski, S: Suicidal Ideation among Inmate-Patients in State Prison: Prevalence, Reluctance to Report, and Treatment Preferences. Behavioral Science and the Law, 31(2): 230-8, 2013.
Kaufman AR, Way BB, Suardi E: Forty Years after Jackson v. Indiana. States’ Compliance with “Reasonable Period of Time” Ruling. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40:261-5, 2012.
Kaufman AR, Knoll JL, Way BB, Leonard C, Widroff J: Survey of Forensic Mental Health Experts on Pro Se Competence After Indiana v. Edwards: Towards an Evidence-Based Pro Se Competency Standard. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39:565-70, 2011.
Knoll JL, Leonard C, Kaufman AR, Way BB: A Pilot Survey of Trial Court Judges’ Opinions on Pro Se Competence after Indiana v. Edwards. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38:536-9, 2010.
Kaufman AR, Way B: North Carolina Resident Psychiatrists Knowledge of the Commitment Statutes: Do They Stray from the Legal Standard in the Hypothetical Application of Involuntary Commitment Criteria? Psychiatric Quarterly, 2010; 81(4): p.363.
Kaufman, AR: More on DSM-5: Will “Cross-Cutting” Butcher Clinical Psychiatry. Correctional Mental Health Report, 2010; 12(2): p. 21.
Kaufman AR: Are Psychiatrists Lexa-Professionals? Correctional Mental Health Report, 2010; 11(5): p. 71
Kaufman AR: Should We Use Law Enforcement for Emergency Transportation of People With Mental Illness? American Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 164(3): Residents’ Journal p. 3
In this interview with Spiro Skouras, you will most likely learn things you have never heard before about the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Kaufman will explain why this is all planned, and is not really about a dangerous virus at all, but a way to control people’s lives.

He will explain things about the new type of vaccine they are rushing so fast to develop, and what he believes is the real objective for this vaccine.

Dr. Kaufman has already paid a steep price to be a whistle blower, and he only expects it to get worse. He states:

This is the only important thing for me to do now, is to get this information out, so that we can prevent ourselves from living in a horrible, horrible future.

I have two young children, and they are my main motivating factor, that I don’t want them to live in a world where they have no freedom. And that’s where we’re heading right now.

And so whatever risks there are, they’re risks that I simply have to take. That’s why I am doing what I am doing.

There have been things that have occurred. I have had consequences. I was let go from my regular psychiatry job because I refused to wear a mask.

I have had several friends who are doctors or other health care professionals who have been very upset with me. (They’re) disappointed and won’t talk to me anymore.

I knew that those risks were part of this. But that’s not what’s important.

I’ll tell you that I would be happy to risk being taken to jail as well, because I’m not going to participate in any of these measures.

I don’t wear a mask. I don’t stay at home.

I respect other people’s rights to make their own choices. So I don’t go and get in people’s faces.

But if anyone is willing to make eye contact and interact with me, I don’t observe any social distancing, (and so) any opportunity to hug someone, especially in public, I always take advantage of that, because I want to show people that actually all of these measures are really voluntary.

Even Governor Cuomo has made a public statement that there’s nothing that they can do to enforce any of these measures and that they are voluntary.

And I would like to encourage other people to make that decision, because if we rely on the authority to give us approval of how to exercise our freedom, they’re going to take more freedoms away, as they’ve been doing.

So while I respect people that to go and protest at the City Hall or State Capital, they are coming from the right point of view, they’re just asking the authority figures, the government, to give them permission, when they don’t need permission from the government.

They already have permission because they have inalienable rights.

It’s not really a decision for me. It’s just what I feel that I have to do to preserve the way of life that I want to live for me and my children.

At the time of this publication, this interview has been viewed just over 15,000 times.

It needs to be MILLIONS! Please watch and share this information that they are trying so hard to censor."

[greybeard]

im normally middle of the road-- certainly not an out and out conspiracy theorist
Like to think Im level headed
The penny dropped big time today
This is World War 3
The enemy of freedom is so clever -- attention to small detail.

For example Boris Johnston was pushing internet for everyone in his election speeches -- I did not really get the need for that till I realised my new laptop has no Ethernet plug input -- My pc has but now I am on fast fibre broad band I cant use Ethernet without switching the modem on.
Talktalk say leave it ion 24/7 other wise it will slow down oh Yeah.
Its much larger in size than the last one i tried that just now and ofc ourse it wont wok any longer now Ive got fibre broad band.
So is it a 5G one --I dont know -- have my suspicions though.

Bits in the media-- paper money dangerous --the next episode of the virus will be more deadly -- how can they say that?
Dont use public transport -- keep two meter distance and on it goes.

Not saying im right in any of my assumptions -- Id rather be wrong but dont think so.

So many dots to join,

Think David Icke made a good job of it

Chris

[Kryztian]

From Bilderberger and former Google President Eric Scmidt. He clearly stepped out of the same evil clown car that Fauci and Gates are riding in.
In a nutshell: Quickly made and "safety" approved vaccines and 5G are what we need.


A Real Digital Infrastructure at Last
American innovation can bring us tools and solutions that will outlast today’s crisis

By Eric Schmidt
March 27, 2020 8:57 am ET

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-real-digital-infrastructure-at-last-11585313825

https://i.imgur.com/u2kXdud.jpg

Like other Americans, technologists are trying to do their part to support the front-line pandemic response. They are creating virus data sets, focusing computing resources on the search for vaccines, tracking the virus’s spread, improving the distribution of critical health care supplies and facilitating online educational tools—work for which my philanthropy, Schmidt Futures, is providing support. This effort reflects the entrepreneurial, results-driven ethos of today’s tech sector.
But every American should be asking where we want the nation to be when the Covid-19 pandemic is over. How could the emerging technologies being deployed in the current crisis propel us into a better future?

Consider big data and novel manufacturing. The government lacks a strong grasp of complex supply and distribution chains for life-critical medical equipment and other goods. Specialists in big data analytics should now turn to modeling these networks to develop real-time tracking and data visualization platforms to better inform policy decisions. The predictive maintenance and additive manufacturing that are gaining traction in the military should become more prominent in health care. Some hospitals are already using 3-D printers to fabricate respirator valves, and it’s saving lives. Companies like Amazon know how to supply and distribute efficiently. They will need to provide services and advice to government officials who lack the computing systems and expertise.

We should also accelerate the trend toward remote learning, which is being tested today as never before. Online, there is no requirement of proximity, which allows students to get instruction from the best teachers, no matter what school district they reside in. There are already useful online learning tools, but they need to be more equitably distributed. Struggling school districts, community colleges and career technical training institutes could benefit if network connectivity becomes more affordable and applications become accessible to a wider range of learners. Science and engineering labs will also be prompted to think of new ways to integrate young talent; there will be experiments in remote internships and apprenticeships.

The need for fast, large-scale experimentation will also accelerate the biotech revolution. Synthetic biology and AI-enabled computer modeling will help us to discover and test more new drugs. Companies and research centers are putting algorithms to work on large data sets to find correlations that would take human researchers years of painstaking laboratory work. As researchers show more results, government agencies like the FDA will face pressure to quicken the trial and vetting process for new drugs, and funding agencies will need to give researchers more flexibility to follow the discoveries wherever they lead.

Finally, the country is long overdue for a real digital infrastructure. Government at every level should move to cloud, mobile and web-based software and start treating data as a strategic asset. It’s now painfully obvious that these tools are essential for effective action. Moreover, the American people will need that infrastructure for their daily lives. If we are to build a future economy and education system based on tele-everything, we need a fully connected population and ultrafast infrastructure. The government must make a massive investment—perhaps as part of a stimulus package—to convert the nation’s digital infrastructure to cloud-based platforms and link them with a 5G network.
The American people are problem-solvers and innovators, and we have the opportunity today for farsighted action. If we invest strategically and mobilize our society, we can build the digital infrastructure necessary to enjoy a higher and healthier standard of living and to solve complex modern problems like today’s pandemic.

[Ernie Nemeth]

There is no arguing it, we need this tech to advance. However, big tech has demonstrated that they are not responsible enough to run it, only engineer it.

It is time to have ordinary citizens over-seeing our leaders because they cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

Not only that, but speaking about government in general, if national governments want to give authority away to international bodies like WHO then we should get a cut in our tax rates, since our medical establishment is now just following orders. Not to mention that if a sovereign nation decides to follow the dictates of a foreign agency - is that nation really sovereign?

[Patient]

There is no arguing it, we need this tech to advance. However, big tech has demonstrated that they are not responsible enough to run it, only engineer it.

It is time to have ordinary citizens over-seeing our leaders because they cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

Not only that, but speaking about government in general, if national governments want to give authority away to international bodies like WHO then we should get a cut in our tax rates, since our medical establishment is now just following orders. Not to mention that if a sovereign nation decides to follow the dictates of a foreign agency - is that nation really sovereign?

Maybe we need to look at what is powering the agenda? Of course money, but maybe it is time for people to start thinking completely "out of the box" for a way to really dismantle this corrupt group(s) and re-establish a better system altogether.

The idea of a "One World Government" has always been looked at as an easier way for the corrupt to control everything. Maybe it can be used to get the world back into the hands of the people? Of course this is easier said than done, and there are many many pieces to this machine, etc. But something drastic, something big that comes directly from the people needs to occur.

Most people are just trying to wait it out and are looking to the day when things go back to normal - but I think that more and more people are realizing that there is no going back. Unfortunately, many still are thinking that a vaccine and keeping social distancing in place is the answer.

Many of the politicians of many countries seem to be quarantined themselves - and by this I mean that they are sitting and waiting to be told what to do from organizations like the WHO and whatever shadow group and contacts that push the buttons.

However, I was excited to see Madagascar's president Andry Rajoelina speak up about what they found worked to help cure covid-19 infections. (an herbal drink containing hydroxychloroquine - although only the first article I read about it contained the word "hydroxychloroquine" and the press has been careful not to mention it in continuing articles.)

The people of the world need to stand up and support a leader like Andry Rajoelina and start our own agenda.

When we see a prime minister like what we have here in Canada (Justin Trudeau) who is handing over millions of Canada's money to the WHO, the Clintons and who knows where else he has stashed away money for his future.

When we hear him say, quote ""Over the last two months, a lot of Canadians have faced very challenging situations and very difficult choices. Just take workers in the fisheries industry. You can't harvest lobster from inside your house," said Trudeau.

"So that leaves you trying to figure out how to either space people out on a fishing boat, or cancel your operations. It's not an easy call to make."


?? He is saying that fishermen have to figure out how to keep social distancing measures in place while working on a fishing boat!

He has to be one of the best examples of a representative of the shady shadow world government.

This thread title is asking us "Is there an agenda?" Again I say that it is about time that the people of the world stand together and create one to fix this mess.

[Gwin Ru]

With respect to blood clots (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110345-Did-anyone-seem-to-catch-Covid-19-in-October--December-last-year&p=1354095&viewfull=1#post1354095) and oxygen desaturation (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110451-Covid-19-Reports-from-the-Medical-Field&p=1347107&viewfull=1#post1347107), here is something that may be a precursor to this phenomenon:


"Suicided" Neurologist Andrew Moulden Exposed Vaccine Fraud (https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/05/Andrew-Moulton-MD.html)

May 17, 2020


EhmD6F5t73A

(Canadian neurologist Andrew Moulden, PhD. MD 1964-2013 explains it all here in 20 six-minute segments (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283985&viewfull=1#post1283985). He was told to play ball or have the ball taken away.)



Often a comet will streak
across the night sky
and we will miss it.
So our true champions
are murdered and flushed down
the memory hole while
charlatans and traitors get Nobel Prizes.


The healthcare industry cannot leave sickness to chance. It is a bigger business than war.
from April 2, 2019
by Henry Makow PhD

Andrew Moulden should have been awarded a Nobel Prize for showing how the "healthcare industry" is poisoning the general population with vaccines. He showed how vaccines were responsible for causing "microscopic strokes" by limiting the flow of oxygen in the bloodstream reaching capillaries.

In his 2009 interview on vactruth.com, Moulden stated:
"I have now conclusively shown that ALL vaccines, from infancy to geriatric, are causing the exact same brain damages irrespective of what disease or disorder comes out. The damages are specific to end vascular "mini-strokes"� that are beneath the resolution of our neuro-imaging, but measurable in a before/after vaccination protocol. They are also directly measurable in real time - however, this involves techniques and technology I have not disclosed to the public as yet."
AND
"The evidence is now self-evident. All you have to do now is receive the education you need to appreciate and see what is before your very eyes - layperson and Doctor."
AND
"It is no longer an opinion as I now have conclusive evidence to show that ALL vaccines are causing the exact same damages for us all in the exact same manner that wild poliovirus caused paralysis, respiratory failure, death, bleeding into the brain, and more."

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/andrew.jpeg


For revealing the truth and trying to save innocent millions from sickness and death, which enrich the health care industry and their accomplices in government and media, Moulden, left, died prematurely in 2013 supposedly of suicide. They claimed he was bipolar but the videos show a very competent and credible young neurologist. He joins the scores of holistic doctors reported murdered in recent years. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcyMrjkMxH4)

A colleague of Dr. Moulden who wishes to remain anonymous reported to Health Impact News that he/she had contact with him two weeks before he died in 2013. Dr. Moulden told our source and a small number of trusted colleagues in October of 2013 that he was about to break his silence and would be releasing new information which could have destroyed the vaccine model of disease management, destroyed a major source of funding for the pharmaceutical industry, and at the same time seriously damaged the foundation of the germ theory of disease. He was ready to come back. Even though he had been silenced, he had never stopped his research.

Then, two weeks later, Dr. Moulden suddenly died.

I know Moulden represented a real challenge because of the unforgivable smear in this rationalwiki article: (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Andrew_Moulden)
Andrew Moulden (c. 1964-2013) was a Canadian quack who pushed an extreme form of anti-vaccine woo, claiming that vaccines are the causes of most illnesses and diseases, including autism. In addition to his anti-vaccine ideology (which is frequently too extreme even for other anti-vaxers) Andrew Moulden was a germ theory denialist, a conspiracy crank, a 9/11 truther, a failed politician, and a snake oil salesman offering an Internet-based magical procedure that will uncover the true causes of everything from shaken baby syndrome and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) to dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Moulden claimed several academic degrees, including a medical degree, but he was not licensed to practice medicine anywhere. In fact, there were apparently restraining orders to keep him out of major medical conferences -- according to him, anyway.
Moulden didn't practise medicine because he was a neurologist. The article challenges his credentials but they are all authentic. He held a PhD and an MD and had studied the effect of vaccines on the brain in a clinical setting for 20 years.

He wrote: (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf)
As many know, I officially quit my medical career in 2007. I did this in order to travel around North America to do research into vaccine safety and to present my research on vaccine safety across Canada and the United States. I only spoke the truth. I was not well received. I only tried to help you save yourselves from where you are right now...Harm's way, you ARE in it. It IS in ALL of you. Like a ticking bomb, it is about to go off.

Where have I been? In 2010-11 I returned to my PhD training to complete a full year accredited Clinical Neuropsychology internship at the Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care in Toronto. During this time I also taught a University course on Health Medicine at York University in Toronto. I stopped talking about my research and vaccines...

The Public Health Department advocated that I NOT be allowed to return to clinical medicine as they were incensed by the message (truth) of my lectures and teaching prior to 'disappearing.' The only way I was allowed to return to organized medicine to work with medical patients was if I signed a contract drawn up by the public health department which states:

1) I am mentally ill and therefore my research and teachings on vaccine safety were delusional.

2) I am not allowed, whatsoever, to speak or present my research or views on vaccine safety, in public, at all, as a condition of being allowed to return to clinical medicine, receiving a medical license, and for maintaining that license.
At this junction, the contract the Public Health Department has me shackled to (it is like my mind and freedom of will and thought and speech is in prison) states that they can take my medical license away and expel me from the University of College of Medicine for which I am employed by. I am about to break my silence. In order to bring my truth forward, for you, I am once again, taking a firm stand. I will ONLY stand for Truth and speak the Truth, so help me God.
Rationalwiki claims Moulden presented no proof when in fact he released a six-hour presentation. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs)




https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/bigtree.jpeg
(Del Bigtree is producer and director of Vaxxed) (http://vaxxedthemovie.com/producers-statement-the-making-of-vaxxed/)

He writes: (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf)
"The end-result of my focused, and dogged investigations, born only of a mind that "enjoys figuring neurobiological enigmas out", has been the discovery not only of the cause of vaccine-induced autism and other medical morbidities but the means to demonstrate this to everyone on a case by case basis. Moreover, the answers that have emerged have also solved several other medical enigmas and has culminated in a re-write of Louis Pasteur's, and contemporary Western style allopathic medicines', entire medical model - "The Germ Theory" of human disease. As it turns out, the reason we have made a "mess of it" with one size fits all vaccines specifically, and antibiotics and pharmaceutical counter-attack measures, in general, is that the Germ Theory was just that - a theory, which has turned out to be wrong, in very fundamental ways. I look forward to sharing what I have discovered with the world.

"The medical establishment is very protective of "core dogma" and reluctant and slow to accept change. Recognizing this, I have elected to release what I have discovered, to the lay and the scientific communities, as well as the criminal justice system, in short succession - beginning August of 2008. THE WORLD IS NOT FLAT!

"The tide of acceptance and change may be slow. However, with the confidence of Columbus, I can now definitively say "the world of human disease is "round" not flat, and it is not so much the substance placed in the body that causes disease. Remarkably, irrespective of the triggering "substance", toxin, metal, particulate, living or dead "bug", or portions thereof, the response of the body is the same across many disease categories, and ultimately medical diagnoses, and remarkably from infancy to adulthood -the pathophysiological mechanism is the same.

"Having solved this medical mystery, has resulted in the solution not only for cause of autism, by for many other mammalian ailments, "diseases" , and the mechanism by which many infectious diseases, including tetanus, smallpox, Spanish flu, rubella, measles, and others, have been causing damage and disease to the human body. As it turns out, it is not the Germs that have been the foe, for which we "attack" with vaccines and drugs, it is something in the bodies' defence systems itself. I look forward to revealing this medical mystery, which has been shrouded in darkness, to the world. I see the truth. Come see for yourself - I have made it that simple for you (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re8UI8aCLpM)
CONCLUSION
I urge you to also watch this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGYJeI_5lEM&list=PLPz-KVremkNOwJAq_Pe4TSTiSkO1dqaqY) because it demonstrates Moulden's awareness of the New World Order. He knew that the central banking fraud begets all other frauds, (https://www.savethemales.ca/310702.html)including war and healthcare. They have to sicken and enslave us to protect this credit monopoly. Moulden was active in a number of political parties attempting banking reform.

The takeaway is that the world is divided between a relatively small number of people who profit from the central banking fraud and the sheeple who are exploited by it. The former include our traitorous political, cultural and business leaders. Whether it is migration, sugar, chemtrails, gender dysphoria or vaccines, we are being poisoned. A satanic cult such as Western society controls and exploits its members by perverting, corrupting and making them sick.

Moulden reminds me of Larry McDonald (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_McDonald), the dynamic leader of the John Birch society who died when a Korean Air flight was shot down by Russians in 1983. When they are not killing them in gratuitous wars, this is what they do to real patriots who are potential leaders.


Related:


Taking No Prisoners - The Vaccine Culture War (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/04/02/taking-no-prisoners-vaccine-culture-war.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20190402Z1&et_cid=DM278272&et_rid=582147732)



Why You Should Say No to Vaccines (https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/why-you-should-say-no-to-vaccines)



Vaccinated Children have 2-5 Times More Disease (https://endalldisease.com/study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-than-non-vaccinated-children/)



Eustace Mullins - The Rockefeller Medical Establishment (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWkqSncY3fg)



J & J Baby Shampoo Causes Cancer? (https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/johnson-and-johnson-baby-shampoo-fails-watchdog-s-quality-tests-1554051753137.html)



http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf



https://www.drandrewmoulden.com/



His 6-hr Proof- Part One (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re8UI8aCLpM)



Part 2 Continuation of the video above (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP3NnuHXPBc)



Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs)



http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-andrew-moulden/



First Comment from Dawn
THANK YOU, thank you, thank you for posting this article!!! My husband is a retired infectious disease doctor who was a medical director for infection control at a large regional hospital in Northwest Ohio for 25 years. He was required to have annual flu shots,etc. He now suffers from Parkinson's Disease and I am convinced that it is mainly due to his exposure to many neurotoxins that lodged in his brain tissue over the years.

You won't be surprised when I tell you that, while at a world Parkinson's conference in Toronto several years ago, I waited for the appropriate forum to ask about the correlation of vaccines to PD. One would think that if it were not true, that there would be plenty of factually documented articles on the topic, which would end the controversy. However, when I asked the question, I was IMMEDIATELY dismissed. As I recall, the speaker replied, "There is no correlation! Next question!" He had something to hide.

[Delight]

Apparently, China has infiltrated our institutions for years and the plan to shut down our economic system and control us is moving right along....

aUVLjrVEEzM

[Hughe]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-17-italian-member-of-parliament-demands-arrest-bill-gates-as-vaccine-criminal.html

In epic speech, Italian member of Parliament demands arrest of Bill Gates as a “vaccine criminal” for pursuing crimes against humanity

Sunday, May 17, 2020 by: Mike Adams
Tags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, bill gates, coronavirus, covid-19, crimes against humanity, medical experiments, Traitor, treason, vaccines


(Natural News) In a bombshell story out of Rome, a member of the Italian Parliament named Sara Cunial has called for Bill Gates to be arrested as a “vaccine criminal” and charged with crimes against humanity.

The story is best covered by GreatGameIndia.com, and we republish most of their story here because of its comprehensive links and coverage, which is among the best in independent media.
Italian Politician Demand Bill Gates Arrest For Crimes Against Humanity

by GreatGameIndia

Days after it was revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria, now an Italian politician has demanded the arrest of Bill Gates in the Italian parliament. Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome denounced Bill Gates as a “vaccine criminal” and urged the Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. She also exposed Bill Gates’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.

As reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, in 2015 it were the Italians who exposed secret Chinese biological experiments with Coronavirus. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.

In an extraordinary seven-minute speech met with wide applause, Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome said that Italy had been subjected to a “Holy Inquisition of false science.”

[Gwin Ru]

Italian Leader Slams ‘False Coronavirus Numbers: 25,000 Did Not Die, it’s a way to Impose a Dictatorship’ (Watch) (https://rairfoundation.com/italian-leader-slams-false-coronavirus-numbers-25000-did-not-die-its-a-way-to-impose-a-dictatorship-watch/)

Posted by Amy Mek
On May 4, 2020

On Friday, April 24, 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship.

The member of the Forza Italia party slammed the closure of 60% of Italian businesses for 25,000 Chinese-Coronavirus deaths from the floor of the legislature. “It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism.” According to the National Institute of Health, 96.3% did not die of coronavirus, but of other pathologies stated Sgarbi – which means that only 925 have died from the virus and 24,075 have died of other things claimed Sgarbi, “….the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Tell the truth!”

Sgarbi’s controversial speech was delivered during ‘Cura Italia’ decree law discussions. The proposal intends to develop measures to strengthen the national health service based on what he claims is false data. Sgarbi challenged his colleagues to investigate the real numbers themselves and be united in the reporting the truth:
Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other…Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…
Watch the exclusively translated RAIR Foundation USA video of Vittorio Sgarbi’s speech:

Sgarbi has been a member of the Italian Parliament several times and also served also in Milan’s municipal government. Sgarbi is also a famous art critic, historian, cultural commentator and television personality.


nnM8ajh09QQ
Transcript: many thanks to Fousesquawk for the translation:
We are on the eve of April 25, and it is necessary to be united against dictatorships and united in the truth. Let’s not make this the chamber of lies.


Not the 26th of February, but the 9th of March, the science, the science evoked here said that the virus was little more than an influenza. That science is what inspired this government, it is said, it was said, and documented, it was said…

Don’t lie! Tell the truth! Don’t make this the chamber of lies. At least the principle of Giambattista Vico is applied, Vico: “verum ipsum factum” [we only know what we make]. So you have heard and you have given the numbers. I want to give them too. No, D’Attis, no, Pagani.

Don’t also say here 25,000 deaths. It’s not true. Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism. The numbers from the Higher Institute of Health say that 96.3% died from other diseases. Exactly the data, the numbers… the numbers. Say this, and it is the truth! It is the truth! Read it! Read it!

Colleagues…Colleague. —[Unintelligible] I have read them all. Sixty per cent died from other diseases, according to the Higher Institute of Health. If you don’t know it, study it!

Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:
Colleague Sgarbi, turn… —Colleague Sgarbi… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president. …[Unintelligible]

Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:
While Italy was a red zone, everyone here was without masks. Today, Basini is accused because he has to wear it. You are ridiculous! You didn’t wear it until the day before yesterday! That is exactly how it is.

In Germany, the economy, health care, and schools will work perfectly on May 4. We are a state with the fewest rights in Europe. Germany has shown proof of strength and the correct response. We here are once more humiliated by Germany even in illness. We have closed 60% of businesses.

I have given data, Dear Trizzino. Go check it out. No, it is clear that I was first to call for the closure of Parliament. Today, here we are, everybody in masks, while the other time, there was only [unintelligible]. There were very few — Dall’Osso. There were few who were wearing the mask, and today you are pointed at if you don’t wear it. Well, precisely because truth is the most important thing, let’s give the actual numbers; let us not continue to lie.

This is certainly strong data. I read it here too, Trizzino 56% in Lombardy, 14% in Emilia, 8% in Piedmont, 5% in Veneto. We cannot imagine applying uniform rules with such disparate zones of the epidemic. And so, I say, at least here we speak the truth. Measure ourselves against Germany.

Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti (https://www.emedevents.com/speaker-profile/matteo-bassetti) said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other… Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…

[I]Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:
Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president.

Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:
I simply said, they all give numbers but not false numbers. Twenty-five thousand people did not die of the coronavirus in Italy. It’s not true. It’s a way to terrorize Italians and impose a dictatorship of consent. It’s ridiculous!

[Gwin Ru]

“Speaking reason to insanity – Sara Cunial speech on COVID-19 in the Italian Parliament”

Fabrice May 17, 2020 at 6:48 pm | Permalink (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=207426#comment-950676)

Italian politician Sara Cunial expressed her stance in Parliament in a speech on the corona virus. In short, it would be summarized: “We were spied on, played down, treated like criminals by our Government, which destroyed our basic, human and natural rights in two months.”


Vn3EE7EMfXc
Here is her whole speech translated to English captions published by “BitChute”
May 10, 2020
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mXcRBkUxiUcS/
Enjoy the video!

Brief notes on Sara Cunial.
Sara Cunial was born in Rome ( July 1979 ) , she is of Venetian origins, residing in Bassano del Grappa, degree in Industrial Chemistry at the University of Padua, in the political elections of March 4, 2018 she was elected to the Chamber of Deputies for the 5 Star Movement as leader in the Veneto region.

On April 17, 2019, accused of supporting positions contrary to her party, she is expelled from the parliamentary group of the 5 Star Movement and goes to the mixed group.

5 Star Movement is the main party which supports the actual Italian goverment.
Best regards.

Fabrice, greetings from Italy.

[norman]

Re: Is There an Agenda

This video is not for News Junkies


The Purpose of Disruption

SOUXM7_jq_Y

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/whitney-race-immunity-sweden-leads-pack



Whitney: In The Race For Immunity, Sweden Leads The Pack

In a pandemic, there is no substitute for immunity, because immunity provides the best protection against reinfection. That’s why Sweden set its sights on immunity from the very beginning. They crafted a policy that was designed to protect the old and vulnerable, prevent the public health system from being overwhelmed, and, most important, allow younger, low-risk people to interact freely so they’d contract the virus and develop the antibodies they’d need to fight future infections. That was the plan and it worked like a charm. Now Sweden is just weeks away from achieving herd immunity (which means that future outbreaks will not be nearly as severe) while the lockdown nations– that are just now easing restrictions– face an excruciating uphill slog that may or may not succeed. Bottom line: Sweden analyzed the problem, figured out what to do, and did it. That’s why they are closing in on the finish line while most of the lockdown states are still stuck at Square 1.


As of this writing, none of the other nations have identified immunity as their primary objective which is why their orientation has been wrong from the get-go. You cannot achieve a goal that you have not identified. The current US strategy focuses on stringent containment procedures (shelter-in-place, self-isolation) most of which have little historical or scientific basis. The truth is, the Trump administration responded precipitously when the number of Covid-positive cases began to increase exponentially in the US. That paved the way for a lockdown policy that’s more the result of groupthink and flawed computer models than data-based analysis and nimble strategic planning. And the results speak for themselves. The 8-week lockdown is probably the biggest policy disaster in US history. Millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of small and mid-sized businesses will now face bankruptcy, and the future prospects for an entire generation of young people have been obliterated. The administration could have detonated multiple nuclear bombs in the country and done less damage than they have with their lunatic lockdown policy.

At present, 24 states have begun the process of reopening their economies. There is no uniform criteria for lifting restrictions, no standardized approach to opening one sector over the other, and no plan for dealing with the inevitable surge of new cases and deaths. It all looks like another disaster in the making but we’ll reserve judgement until the results are in. What we know for certain is that no one in the Trump administration gave the slightest thought to the problems that might arise from eventually lifting the restrictions. We know that because we know that there was no “exit strategy”, just make-it-up-on-the-fly and hope for the best.

In contrast, Sweden won’t need an exit strategy because it never shut down its economy or quarantined its people to begin with. So the transition to normal life and stepped-up economic activity is not going to be as difficult. That’s the benefit of strategic planning, it anticipates the problems one might encounter on the path one’s goal. Here’s a clip from an interview with Swedish an infectious disease clinician, Johan Giesecke, , who served as state epidemiologist of Sweden as well as Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Giesecke helps explain why the Swedish approach is different. It’s a matter of perception as well as analysis:

“What we are seeing is a rather mild infection spreading around the globe. I think there is relatively little chance of stopping this whatever measures we take. Most people will become infected by this and most people won’t even notice. We have data now from Sweden that between 98 and 99% of the cases have had a very mild infection or didn’t even realize they were infected. So we have the spread of this mild disease around the globe and most of it is happening where we don’t see it because it happens among people who don’t get very sick and , spread it to someone else who doesn’t get very sick… What we looking at (with the official number of cases and deaths) is a thin layer at the top of people who do develop the disease and an even thinner layer of people who go into intensive care and an even thinner layer of people who die. But the real outbreak is happening where we don’t see it.” (“Swedish scientist Johan Giesecke asks Australia how it plans to lift its lockdown without deaths”, you tube…52 second mark to 1:48)

Giesecke’s analysis veers from the conventional view of the virus which explains why the Swedish response has been so different. For example, he says: “I think there is relatively little chance of stopping this whatever measures we take.”

This gets to the root of the Swedish approach. Sweden is not trying to suppress the infection which they see as a force of nature (like a tsunami) that cannot be contained but only mitigated. From the beginning, the Swedish approach has been to “control the spread of the virus”, not to suppress it through containment strategies. There’s a fundamental difference here, and that difference is expressed in the policy.


Second, “We have data now from Sweden that between 98 and 99% of the cases have had a very mild infection or didn’t even realize they were infected.” In other words, this is highly-contagious infection that poses little or no threat to most people. That suggests the economy can be kept open without endangering the lives of low-risk groups. The added benefit of allowing certain businesses to remain open, is that it creates a controlled environment in which the infection can spread rapidly through the healthy population who, in turn, develop the antibodies they need for future outbreaks. This all fits within Sweden’s plan for managing, rather than avoiding, the virus.

Finally, “What we looking at is a thin layer at the top of people who do develop the disease and an even thinner layer of people who go into intensive care and an even thinner layer of people who die.” The vast majority of people who die from Covid are over 65 with multiple underlying conditions. It’s a terrible tragedy that they should die, but destroying the lives and livelihoods of millions of working people in a futile attempt to stop an unstoppable force like Covid, is foolish and unforgivable. The appropriate response is to protect the old and infirm as much as possible, carefully monitor the rise in cases to prevent the public health system from cratering, and keep the economy operating at a lower level. And that’s exactly what Sweden has done.

FAUCI vs. PAUL: Operation “Obfuscate Immunity”
Not surprisingly, the issue of immunity came up during Dr Anthony Fauci’s testimony on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. There was a heated exchange between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul who challenged the infectious disease expert on the misleading information that the WHO has been spreading in the media. Here’s an excerpt from the transcript:

Senator Rand Paul: “Dr. Fauci, Studies show that the recovering COVID-19 patients from the asymptomatic to the very sick are showing significant antibody response. Studies show that SARS and MERS, also coronaviruses, induce immunity for at least 2 to 3 years, and yet the media continues to report that we have no evidence that patients who survive coronavirus have immunity. I think actually the truth is the opposite. We have no evidence that survivors of coronavirus don’t have immunity and a great deal of evidence to suggest that they do….

You’ve stated publicly that you’d bet it at all that survivors of coronavirus have some form of immunity. Can you help set the record straight that the scientific record, as it is being accumulated, is supportive that infection with coronavirus likely leads to some form of immunity, Dr. Fauci?”

Dr. Anthony Fauci: “Thank you for the question, Senator Paul. Yes, you’re correct that I have said that, given what we know about the recovery from viruses such as coronaviruses in general, or even any infectious disease with very few exceptions, that when you have antibody present it very likely indicates a degree of protection.

I think it’s in the semantics of how this is expressed. When you say has it been formally proven by long-term natural history studies, which is the only way that you can prove, one, is it protective, which I said and will repeat, it’s likely that it is, but also what is the degree or titer of antibody that gives you that critical level of protection and what is the durability. As I’ve often said and again repeat, you can make a reasonable assumption that it would be protective, but natural history studies over a period of months to years will then tell you definitively if that’s the case.” (Real Clear Politics)

This is a critical exchange that helps to underscore what an elusive and calculating political character Fauci really is. You will notice that his answer is completely scripted, completely circuitous and carefully avoids any mention of the word “immunity”.

Rand Paul’s question couldn’t be more straightforward: Do Covid survivors have immunity or not? Yes or no?

And, the answer is: “Yes, they do. Covid survivors do have immunity.”

But Fauci doesn’t deliver that answer, after a long-winded rumination, Fauci finally offers the most opaque response he can conjure up, he says, “you can make a reasonable assumption that it would be protective.” In other words, he carefully avoids a definitive answer. But, of course, that’s understandable since the WHO has been spreading false rumors about herd immunity trying to muddy the science since it doesn’t jibe with their pro-vaccine agenda. That’s what this is all about, bashing natural immunity to clear the way for a vaccine. Check out this clip from an article at Business Insider:

“…leaders at the World Health Organization Monday expressed outrage at the idea that some people might have to die in pursuit of a far-fetched virus-fighting strategy called herd immunity.

“This idea that, ‘well, maybe countries who had lax measures and haven’t done anything will all of a sudden magically reach some herd immunity, and so what if we lose a few old people along the way?’ This is a really dangerous, dangerous calculation,” the WHO’s Executive Director of Health Emergencies Mike Ryan said on a call with reporters.

Ryan didn’t mention any specific countries by name, but it was hard not to think about the high death rate in Swedish nursing homes as he mentioned that “in some countries, over half of the cases have occurred in longterm care facilities,” where people haven’t been “properly shielded.”…

“Humans are not herds,” Ryan said. “I think we need to be really careful when we use terms in this way around natural infections in humans, because it can lead to a very brutal arithmetic which does not put people, and life, and suffering at the center of that equation.”

Ryan was audibly troubled by the idea that the world would accept an infection spreading through a population, and even killing some people, to provide a kind of herd protection, especially one which scientists don’t even know exists. He said that’s not a calculus that any “responsible” country should be willing to take.” (“Humans are not Herds”, Business Insider)



Your email...
As you can see, the Gates Vaccine Gestapo has launched a propaganda campaign aimed at discrediting, obfuscating and ridiculing other methods for achieving immunity that don’t coincide with their grandiose ambitions to use vaccines as an entry-point for enhanced global tracking, surveillance and social control. Is anyone surprised by this?

But the fact remains that–as Paul says, “recovering COVID-19 patients …show significant antibody response (and will likely have) immunity for at least 2 to 3 years.” Here’s more from Sweden’s chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell who made this comment in an interview last week:

“It is quite certain that immunity does exist…. For all the cases we have had in Sweden, there has not been one single person who had this disease twice. And we have a very strict identification system. So there is no way we would miss a person who had it twice. I haven’t heard any reports from any countries where there has been a certified case who has actually had this twice. There’s been rumors about it. But in the end, they have been disclaimed.” (“Key quotes: Sweden’s top epidemiologist challenges conventional wisdom on COVID-19” ijnet)

Repeat: “there has not been one single person who had this disease twice.”

The science is clear, immunity is real and Sweden is on its way to achieving herd immunity within the month.

Sweden’s public health experts have loosened the grip of a vicious pandemic and delivered the Swedish people to a place of safety and security where they can get on with their lives without fear of contracting a lethal infection.

Hurrah for Sweden!

[Ernie Nemeth]

The virus scare is just a vessel for the agenda that was always in place. It is their modus operandi.

It was not hard to predict in the early eighties that the multi-national corporations were imminently poised to move operations over-seas to cheaper labor markets. Multi-nationals have no allegiance to any country or peoples. They follow the bottom line wherever it leads.

North America was systematically gutted during the eighties and nineties. By then the writing was on the wall. Under free trade deals foreign nationals began the buy up of the continent's hard assets. 9/11 was the symbolic act revealing the take-over of America that had begun two decades before. The day after it was a done deal. There were then only t's to cross and i's to dot.

The transfer of wealth was finalized in the 2008 debacle that handed world dominance into the hands of the ChiComs and the globalist cabal that is the UN.

Now all that's left is the final demoralization of the people by unreasonable decrees. Start by saturating the west with foreign nationals under the guise of refugee and immigrant catastrophes. Create much unrest, create discord, create inequality.

Then introduce unprecedented and draconian measures in response to what amounts to nothing more than a mild flu.

Destroy what's left of the American continent after the economy has constricted to a point where civil society implodes.

Take possession of American forces and assets in exchange for food and debt relief for the people. Relegate American forces to the UN for enforcement of world order under the new normal of the Chinese controlled UN.

[shaberon]

The virus scare is just a vessel for the agenda that was always in place. It is their modus operandi.

It was not hard to predict in the early eighties that the multi-national corporations were imminently poised to move operations over-seas to cheaper labor markets. Multi-nationals have no allegiance to any country or peoples. They follow the bottom line wherever it leads.



To pin the tail on the donkey, I would say it can be shown that there is continuity of power from Boer War 1900 to Davos Conference 2020 by a thing called Capitalism. That sounds like what you are talking about. Is it not accurate to say that Capitalism is the most concrete term for "they" who run the agenda?

[norman]

The virus scare is just a vessel for the agenda that was always in place. It is their modus operandi.

It was not hard to predict in the early eighties that the multi-national corporations were imminently poised to move operations over-seas to cheaper labor markets. Multi-nationals have no allegiance to any country or peoples. They follow the bottom line wherever it leads.



To pin the tail on the donkey, I would say it can be shown that there is continuity of power from Boer War 1900 to Davos Conference 2020 by a thing called Capitalism. That sounds like what you are talking about. Is it not accurate to say that Capitalism is the most concrete term for "they" who run the agenda?


Stick "Corrupt Crony" in front of that word and you get an absolute thumb's up from me too, and I'm not even a great fan of raw capitalism either. I'm for bringing stuff to the table to share, with love. The "left" has no idea what that is either, so please don't misunderstand me.


:focus:

[mountain_jim]

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/business/modernas-covid-19-vaccine-takes-lead-chief-medical-officers-recent-promotion-gene-editing-vaccines/



As Moderna’s Covid-19 Vaccine Takes The Lead, Its Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-Editing Vaccines” Comes to Light

….

Moderna’s chief medical officer has described the company’s products as “hacking the software of life” and permanently altering a person’s genetic code. If Moderna is poised to bring the first Covid-19 vaccine to market, a deeper look at his comments and his employer are warranted.

More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc.

Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.” Moderna’s response is odd given that the “study” in question is focused on safety and “is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine,” according to a report in TIME. Notably, none of the study’s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “generally safe.” It is also worth noting that this “safety-focused” study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine’s effects in the very short term.

Meet Dr. Zaks

With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls, it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna’s current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. Zaks, an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline, oversees “preclinical development, clinical development and regulatory affairs” for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries.
In a 2017 TED Talk, two years after joining Moderna, Zaks spoke at length about how he views mRNA vaccines and their modality, including those he produces at Moderna. In a speech entitled “The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing,” Zaks’ description of Moderna’s mRNA products as, making permanent edits to human genes, clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines “degrade” over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines.

Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies “are actually hacking the software of life and that it’s changing the way we think of and treat disease.” He describes mRNA as “critical information that determines what a cell will actually do” and then states that, if one could “introduce a line of code or change a line of code” in a person’s genome, that has “profound implications for everything.” He then falsely claims that Moderna’s products at the time were proven to “work in people” as the company, prior to Covid-19, was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness.

Zaks further described his view of well-known diseases like cancer as being caused by “screwed-up DNA” that can be “fixed” with Moderna mRNA vaccines, which he also refers to in the talk as “information therapy” given that he says Moderna’s vaccines work by altering the “operating systems” of human cells, i.e. their genetic code.

< more at link >




https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/status/1262524604263927809?s=20

1262524604263927809

[shaberon]

Are these people trying to go straight to jail??

Here is an outside opinion on agenda (https://www.globalresearch.ca/fast-tracking-covid-19-vaccine-why-should-we-worry/5713712), which, in apparently plain terms, Moderna is a Gates & Fauci driven company running away with public funds to do something, which, even if unsuccessful, will be an enriching financial success:

"One caveat is that Moderna has never brought a vaccine nor a therapeutic product to the market and is therefore largely inexperienced. There is also no public release of consent forms that the trial participants are required to sign. And no indication of how much volunteers were paid. Are they being compensated with inordinate amounts beyond the industry’s standards to accept high risk? None of this information has been provided."

It also mentions several examples of the history of coronavirus vaccines being unsuccessful.

The world should know about the type of fraud that is planned to being administered to Mother Earth’s 7 billion people. Here is the response from Robert Kennedy (https://www.globalresearch.ca/moderna-covid-vaccine-trials/5713705):

“Despite Moderna’s (pharmaceutical company created by the Bill Gates Foundation) cheery press release this morning (20 May 2020), the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse.

The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental mRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitions “warp speed” timeline.

Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waved ferret and primate studies (Moderna suspiciously reported no health data from its mouse studies).

That appears to have been a mistake. Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving Moderna’s jab.

Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data, but its press release, which was freighted with inconsistencies, acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention“.

Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study.

A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “every person on earth”.

That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown.

Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants.

These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead; challenging participants with wild COVID infection.

Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and died when exposed to the wild virus.

Moderna’s press announcement heralded “Positive Interim Phase 1 findings”.

I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys.”

Is it the least bit odd that someone must have taken it over 43 days ago?

[greybeard]

You are always on target shaberon , thanks for many enlightening posts
Chris

[pueblo]

Are these people trying to go straight to jail??

Here is an outside opinion on agenda (https://www.globalresearch.ca/fast-tracking-covid-19-vaccine-why-should-we-worry/5713712), which, in apparently plain terms, Moderna is a Gates & Fauci driven company running away with public funds to do something, which, even if unsuccessful, will be an enriching financial success:

"One caveat is that Moderna has never brought a vaccine nor a therapeutic product to the market and is therefore largely inexperienced. There is also no public release of consent forms that the trial participants are required to sign. And no indication of how much volunteers were paid. Are they being compensated with inordinate amounts beyond the industry’s standards to accept high risk? None of this information has been provided."

It also mentions several examples of the history of coronavirus vaccines being unsuccessful.

The world should know about the type of fraud that is planned to being administered to Mother Earth’s 7 billion people. Here is the response from Robert Kennedy (https://www.globalresearch.ca/moderna-covid-vaccine-trials/5713705):

“Despite Moderna’s (pharmaceutical company created by the Bill Gates Foundation) cheery press release this morning (20 May 2020), the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse.

The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental mRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitions “warp speed” timeline.

Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waved ferret and primate studies (Moderna suspiciously reported no health data from its mouse studies).

That appears to have been a mistake. Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving Moderna’s jab.

Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data, but its press release, which was freighted with inconsistencies, acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention“.

Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study.

A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “every person on earth”.

That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown.

Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants.

These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead; challenging participants with wild COVID infection.

Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and died when exposed to the wild virus.

Moderna’s press announcement heralded “Positive Interim Phase 1 findings”.

I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys.”

Is it the least bit odd that someone must have taken it over 43 days ago?

43 days ago brings us to the 10th of April, however after a quick look at a press release on Moderna's website it seems they started Phase 1 Coronavirus vaccine studies/tests on the 24th of February! That was bloody quick, considering they only received funding to develop a vaccine for the novel Coronavirus a month earlier!


February 24, 2020
Moderna Ships mRNA Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus (mRNA-1273) for Phase 1 Study


January 23, 2020
Moderna Announces Funding Award from CEPI to Accelerate Development of Messenger RNA (mRNA) Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus

https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases

[Arcturian108]

My other half calls this video "Fraudi":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4hj1Zf4ifA

[shaberon]

January 23, 2020
Moderna Announces Funding Award from CEPI to Accelerate Development of Messenger RNA (mRNA) Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus


So in other words, the money only accelerated something that was already happening in January.

They knew what to do because what--the Chinese identified a virus, meaning a genome, on Dec. 27?

And this piece of information--or, what else may be included with it? Allows someone around the world to begin working because...because...they haven't found a sick person in their population yet?

Maybe, just maybe, this is so easy to do because it is just like using a blueprint for a circuit board, and because that is right we should just go ahead and take this stuff since they were right all along. But there is something terribly fishy and incomplete about how that could possibly be.

All I see is motive because it is the pet company of vested interests. This drips with "stealing your country right in front of your face".

[gini]

Well,what i feared but hoped it was just my paranoia,is happening in real time... here in Thailand with 56 dead and nobody hospitalised, control must be the agenda. Yesterday,after the normalised temperature taking and the mandatory sterilising handgel , i was asked to scan my mobile or write down my nr. to be allowed shopping....
Apperantly this is just the start for the new normal to scan your smart phone in any public service and carry a track app where ever you go. Looks like its a global thing happening everywhere simulaniously?
This 11 minute video from a "left/progressive" reporter sums up the latest moves in the states and in the rest of the world.
"Expansion of the surveillance state is underway" Kim Iverson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXEpuDCbn_Q

[Ernie Nemeth]

Isn't it possible to not take your phone with you?

I do that now. No phone when I go out.

Almost cancelled my cell service but decided that was too much.

[greybeard]

Isn't it possible to not take your phone with you?

I do that now. No phone when I go out.

Almost cancelled my cell service but decided that was too much.

I have a cheap mobile -- no internet --just text and calls-- I mainly use text.
I switch it off when going out.
Its handy to have in case --the car breaks down -- or im going to be late.
Chris

[Ernie Nemeth]

And that is why I laugh when someone says this world and its technology is a marvel.

It should be a marvel and could be a marvel, but it is far from being a marvel. Every bit of technology ever created was leveraged to maximize profit and minimize value. We have paid heavily for all our gadgets.

And now with the tracking technology, which by the way requires, like all apps, forfeiting your privacy and control of your tech anyway, why would I conspire against myself?

You are just renting that phone - it is theirs and not yours.

[gord]

Well,what i feared but hoped it was just my paranoia,is happening in real time... here in Thailand with 56 dead and nobody hospitalised, control must be the agenda. Yesterday,after the normalised temperature taking and the mandatory sterilising handgel , i was asked to scan my mobile or write down my nr. to be allowed shopping....
Apperantly this is just the start for the new normal to scan your smart phone in any public service and carry a track app where ever you go. Looks like its a global thing happening everywhere simulaniously?
This 11 minute video from a "left/progressive" reporter sums up the latest moves in the states and in the rest of the world.
"Expansion of the surveillance state is underway" Kim Iverson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXEpuDCbn_Q

And with easily falsified data, what a handy way to create pariahs on demand.

[shaberon]

I never figured a phone to be particularly private, but mandating service where there is hardly any disease doesn't seem to fit.

Now there are of course many more than three American/British companies pursuing vaccines, and it is for I or we to grumble about how this is being done, while the rest of the world pursues its own ways. And how it works with the Russian vaccine is, the doctors that made it, tested it on themselves.

No one forces them to do that since such procedures are standard in medical field research.

They say it worked, and, as to whether it has malign effects, we will have to see. Again, this is of course a small number of healthy individuals, and it seems to me that if applied to at-risk individuals, might not go so well. Especially if it is many of these who got flu shots and seemed to do worse.

I don't know how much we can know about what are the real differences in any vaccines coming out around the world, or if you would get to pick one. I don't think we can get around the fact that many people will want one. I don't think we can defeat demand if we choose not to participate.

[AutumnW]

The Moderna vaccine is in the preliminary stage of trials. The fact that lousy results are out in the open is a good thing. Do you think if there was a govt/corporate plan to kill a bunch of people globally, through a vaccine these results would be made public?

There are plenty of conspiracies out there way more compelling than this lame one.

[East Sun]

The Gates/cabal plan is to genocide more than half the world population by
vaccine. That is something we need to pay attention to for starters,
I would say.

[greybeard]

The Moderna vaccine is in the preliminary stage of trials. The fact that lousy results are out in the open is a good thing. Do you think if there was a govt/corporate plan to kill a bunch of people globally, through a vaccine these results would be made public?

There are plenty of conspiracies out there way more compelling than this lame one.

If you look closely at the agenda you will see a lot of honesty cropping up.
They want the "sheep" to willingly walk into the vaccination room,
Then they can say "we told you so"
Forget all the conspiracy - what if its just about money for drug companies?
The creating mass fear would be a great seller of the vaccine
.People are so scared of death they will take anything to avoid it.
Look at the side effects that come on the leaflet accompanying any medicine.

So they can say and have The vaccine may be 50% effective, some may experience side effects 84% of monkeys recommend.
this
Regardless people are sleep walking into a disaster of epidemic proportion

Never in the history of man, have so few, brought so much fear, to so many.

Chris

[shaberon]

The Moderna vaccine is in the preliminary stage of trials. The fact that lousy results are out in the open is a good thing. Do you think if there was a govt/corporate plan to kill a bunch of people globally, through a vaccine these results would be made public?

There are plenty of conspiracies out there way more compelling than this lame one.


I am not concerned with killing anyone, this is more of a totalitarian issue and the misuse of public funds. Someone is going to have to come up with some good excuses why Moderna and Johnson and Johnson and a few others seem to have received an egregious degree of favoritism.

Most of the agenda and cui bonos are completely legal, so it is not a conspiracy.

The known results of the vaccine are a press statement without standard legal disclosures. Maybe this has been legally bent and waived too.

None of the articles mentioned anything about whether it was attempted murder. That's not the subject. Some believe it to be a motive, but whether it is or not, asking why we might immediately give big money to a company that has not yet gotten any vaccine onto the market, cannot even be called a radical view.

[Gwin Ru]

The agenda? Well, one is "vaccines" and their sure fire mega-profits...

France Bans Use of Hydroxychloroquine as Treatment for COVID-19 Patients - Reports (https://sputniknews.com/europe/202005271079431145-france-bans-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-as-treatment-for-covid-19-patients---reports/)


https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/img/107943/13/1079431341_0:112:2841:1648_1000x541_80_0_0_7ea4403190fe7499a29c451d4f54799a.jpg.webp
© REUTERS / DIEGO VARA

Sputnik Europe (https://sputniknews.com/europe/)
09:41 GMT 27.05.2020
(updated 10:22 GMT 27.05.2020)

On Tuesday, the French High Council for Public Health (HCSP) and the Agency for the Safety of Health Products (ANSM) had suspended the use of hydroxychloroquine as a means to combat COVID-19 for both the treatment of patients and clinical trials.

The French government has cancelled a decree permitting hospital doctors to administer hydroxychloroquine as a treatment to patients suffering severe forms of coronavirus.

Earlier, the World Health Organization (WHO) paused an extended trial of the malaria drug due to safety concerns.

At the end of March, France decided to allow the use of hydroxychloroquine in specific situations, and exclusively in hospitals.

The study, published last Friday in The Lancet medical journal, revealed that there was an increased risk of death when the drug was used for patients with COVID-19 (https://sputniknews.com/uk/202005271079426730-tory-civil-war-hikes-pressure-on-johnson-to-sack-dominic-cummings-for-breaching-covid-19-lockdown/). The publication prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to halt its clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine on Monday as a precautional measure.

The number of people who have died in France from coronavirus-related complications has reached 28,530, an increase of 315 since the latest previous reported figures last week, the French Public Health Agency (DGS) said.

The last time the DGS released a situation report on the death toll in France was last Thursday. The report stated 28,215 deaths linked to COVID-19.

According to the update, 100,841 people in total have been hospitalized since the beginning of the pandemic, and 16,264 currently remain in hospitals, down from 18,468 last week, including 1,555 patients in intensive care units.

[Tintin]

Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose? by Rosemary Frei for OffGuardian (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/26/were-conditions-for-high-death-rates-at-care-homes-created-on-purpose/) May 26th, 2020

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/nursing-home-stock-photo-1000.jpg


During the COVID-19 pandemic, people in care homes have been dying in droves.

Why is this happening? Is it simply because older adults are very vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 and therefore it’s not unexpected that many would succumb?

Or do care homes deserve the lion’s share of the blame, such as by paying so poorly that many workers have to split their time between several facilities, spreading the virus in the process?

Alternatively, could medical experts and government bureaucrats, with the full knowledge of at least the top tier of government officials, have created conditions shortly after the pandemic struck that contribute to the high death tolls while engendering virtually no public backlash against themselves?

This article shows that the third hypothesis is highly plausible. The people who created the conditions may be unaware of, or oblivious to, their implications. But it’s also possible that at least some of them know exactly what they’re doing.

After all – seeing it from an amoral government’s point of view – the growing numbers of elderly are a big burden on today’s fiscally strained governments, because in aggregate they’re paying much less into the tax base than younger people while causing the costs of healthcare and retirement programs to skyrocket.

Here are three sets of conditions that collectively create a framework for enabling significantly boosted care-home deaths – and doing so with impunity – even while most of each set of conditions in isolation may appear to be purely for the benefit of everyone in society:

One. Bureaucrats develop extremely broad definitions of novel-coronavirus infections and outbreaks. This is coupled with the continuing presence, in a number of care homes scattered across each jurisdiction, of at least one nurse or physician who follows every letter of all definitions and rules. (Such individuals are always present in every discipline, but in the medical milieu their actions can be deliberate, deadly and very hard to detect.)

Two. Influential organizations and individuals produce hospital-care-rationing guidelines that recommend younger people receive higher priority than the elderly during the pandemic, by giving significant weight to how many years of life patients would have ahead of them if treatment is successful. Also, some guidelines bar care-home residents from being transferred to hospital.

Three. The chief coroner and leaders of the funeral, cremation and burial industries craft procedures that fundamentally change the way care-home deaths are documented and bodies dealt with. Their stated goal is to prevent overburdening of medical staff and body-storage areas during a surge in COVID-19 deaths.

They also put them into effect very quickly with no notice to the public; this gives those directly affected very limited opportunity for input or push-back.

Among the many radical changes is death certificates are no longer completed by people who care for care-home residents; instead, they are filled in by the chief coroner’s office.

Also, examination of the undisturbed death scene is prevented, as are all but a very few post-mortems and other sober second looks at the cause and mode of death.

In the background are the complicit ranks of public-health organizations, politicians, media and many other influential individuals. When the pandemic first strikes they focus on how new, dangerous and poorly understood the virus is. As one side effect, this scares many care-home staff so much they flee in fear, leaving their overwhelmed colleagues to cope.

After a short time, they also start to distract the public and victims’ loved ones from uncovering the three sets of conditions by focusing on other factors in the rash of deaths among institutionalized elderly – and by insisting the solution to everything is more testing and contact tracing, along with accelerated vaccine and anti-viral development.

This article shows how the three sets of conditions were put in place in Ontario, Canada.

Variations on these conditions very likely have been crafted in other jurisdictions in North America, Europe and elsewhere. An exclusive interview with the daughter of one of the dozens of people who died during an outbreak at an Ontario care home illustrates how the three sets of conditions work in practice.

CONDITION SET ONE: BROAD DEFINITIONS OF NOVEL-CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONS AND OUTBREAKS

At the start of the novel-coronavirus epidemic in Ontario, formal definitions of infections and care-home-outbreaks weren’t issued, at least not publicly.

Rather, in late March Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario, Dr. David Williams, and the Associate Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Barbara Yaffe, described the criteria verbally during their daily press briefings.

An outbreak should be declared when two or three people show symptoms of infection with the novel coronavirus, they said.

Also, polymerase chain reaction testing for viral RNA wasn’t required for confirmation.

This is a loosened version of criteria used in the province (http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/oph_standards/docs/respiratory_outbreaks_cd.pdf) prior to the novel-coronavirus epidemic. These previous criteria defined an outbreak as either: two people in the same area of a facility developing symptoms within two days of each other (making their infections ‘epidemiologically linked’) and at least one of them testing positive for viral RNA; or three people in the same area developing symptoms within two days of each other.

On March 30 (https://web.archive.org/web/20200406203248/http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/LTCH_outbreak_guidance.pdf) the Ontario health ministry released new rules for defining and managing care-home outbreaks (with the document confusingly dated April 1). Staff at all Ontario care nursing homes were trained on the new rules via webinars two days later, on April 1.

The new rules included an even broader outbreak definition (https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/April-1-2020-MOH-LTCH_outbreak_guidance-1.pdf?x51194): the presence of only one person with just one symptom of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Outbreaks were deemed confirmed when just one resident or staff member tested positive; subsequently, every resident in the care home showing any coronavirus-infection symptoms is deemed to have COVID-19.

Notably, however, there wasn’t a symptom list in the document. Dr. Williams said on April 1 during that day’s press briefing they deliberately did not include a list of infection.

This is because:



“to look for those symptoms [in the rest of the care-home residents after the initial case is identified] is a challenge, particularly in seniors,” […] “They may not mount a fever, they may have a lot of other symptoms and they may not have obvious symptoms. [Rather,] any change in their health condition really [can be considered a symptom].”

A few minutes later Dr. Williams added:



"I don’t mind false alarms. [As a result of the looser outbreak criteria] the numbers [of outbreaks that] we see might be[come] quite [a bit] larger …. e want to ramp up the sensitivity. [That] means the number of outbreaks will go up, because we’ve widened the definition.”


One week later, April 8, a Provincial Testing Guidance Update (https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/2019_covid_testing_guidance-Apr-10-2020-expanded-testing-and-expanded-signs-and-symptoms.pdf?x51194) was issued. It included the following list of symptoms (most of which are highly non-specific): fever, any new or worsening acute respiratory illness symptom – for example cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose or sneezing, nasal congestion, hoarse voice, difficulty swallowing – and pneumonia.

The document also listed several symptoms that are “atypical” but “should be considered, particularly in people over 65” : unexplained fatigue/malaise, acutely altered mental status and inattention (i.e., delirium), falls, acute functional decline, worsening of chronic conditions, digestive symptoms (e.g., nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain), chills, headaches, croup, unexplained tachycardia, decreased blood pressure, unexplained hypoxia (even if mild) and lethargy.

Then on April 22 the province produced the first COVID-19-screening guidelines for care homes (https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/2019_patient_screening_guidance-Apr-22-2020-update.pdf?x51194). It’s broadly similar to the April 8 document, except that two or more of some of the symptoms – for example sore throat, runny nose and sneezing, stuffed-up nose, diarrhea – need to be present for a person to be deemed positive.

On May 2 a new testing guidance (http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/2019_covid_testing_guidance.pdf) and a new screening guide (https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/2019_patient_screening_guidance-Apr-22-2020-update.pdf?x51194) were released. Both documents concede that if a person has only a runny or stuffed-up nose, “consideration should be given to other underlying reasons for these symptoms such as seasonal allergies and post-nasal drip.”

They also narrow the definition of falls considered diagnostic of a novel-coronavirus infection in people over 65, to falls that are unexplained or increasing in number.

However, they add to the symptom list another three that are very non-specific: a decrease in sense of taste, abdominal pain and pink eye.

There are enormous implications to having overly broad definitions of symptoms and outbreaks, particularly in combination with other rules put in place at the beginning of the epidemic.

Broad definitions very likely are used in many other jurisdictions around the world, albeit perhaps masked by the use of somewhat different terms.

First, in Ontario, in every facility with an outbreak, every resident with even just one symptom is defined (http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/2019_case_definition.pdf) as being a ‘probable’ COVID-19 case (https://web.archive.org/web/20200401103128/http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/2019_case_definition.pdf). This applies whether these residents had an inconclusive or negative viral-RNA test result – or even weren’t tested at all.

Second, the cause of death of everyone who had been diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection is recorded as being COVID-19. This is a dictate of the World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19-20200420-EN.pdf?ua=1) and is followed throughout North America, Europe and elsewhere.

Third, COVID-19-attributed deaths are deemed ‘natural’ by new rules released (https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.227/bcb.92b.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/QA-LTC-April-13.pdf) by the chief coroner on April 9 (see ‘Condition Set Three,’ below). In all but an extremely small number of cases, natural deaths are exempt from any further investigations or post-mortems. (Over the last 30 years post-mortems have become rare, but to almost completely remove the possibility is another matter.)

Taken together, this may explain what the daughter of a woman who died along with dozens of others, during a COVID-19 outbreak at an Ontario care home experienced. The daughter granted the author an exclusive interview on May 13. (Under a pseudonym to shield her from possible repercussions.)

Diane Plaxton said in the interview that on April 1 she received a shocking and unexpected phone call from her mother’s care home.

“Your mother’s declining. She’s been having loose bowels and lots of diarrhea. There’s a DNR on her chart. And we’re not sending anyone to the hospital. [Likely because of ‘Condition Set Two,’ below] We’re going to have to put her on palliative care,” Plaxton recalls the head nurse telling her in a cold, uncaring voice.

Plaxton was stunned. She knew about her mother’s diarrhea: it was from bowel-cleansing meds she’d been on for about nine days, after being diagnosed with a clogged bowel. Plaxton told the nurse that if her mother seemed to be declining it probably was from the diarrhea and resultant dehydration.

She suggested to the head nurse that she give mother IV rehydration. The nurse refused, saying it would “just prolong the inevitable.”

The head nurse didn’t say the word COVID-19, nor tell Plaxton the home had been declared to have an outbreak that day.

She also didn’t mention that on March 30 the province had issued new rules on novel-coronavirus infections and outbreaks, then trained all of Ontario’s care-home staff on them via webinar April 1. As described above, the rules included very broad definitions of SARS-CoV-2 infections and outbreaks.

Therefore the nurse could well have been complying fully with the new rules by diagnosing Plaxton’s mother with a novel-coronavirus infection based on her having diarrhea alone (and without telling Plaxton any of this).

Furthermore, since transfer to a hospital was not an option (as per ‘Condition Set Two’) and since COVID-19 is deemed to be very frequently fatal in the elderly, this may be why the head nurse pushed Plaxton so hard to consent to palliative care for her mother.

Shaken but unbowed, Plaxton asked the head nurse to let her speak to the nurse who had been directly caring for her mother.

Fortunately, that second nurse was kind, and agreed that palliative care was not appropriate for Plaxton’s mother. She agreed instead to allow her to not take the bowel-cleaning meds, and to coax her to eat and drink to recover her fluids and strength. She also said she’d keep an eye on the slight fever Plaxton’s mother had.

Over the next few days this plan worked, and the nurse told Plaxton she needn’t worry.

That’s why it hit Plaxton like a gut punch when on April 10 she got a call from another nurse, who was panicking. She told Plaxton her mom was struggling to breathe and “going fast.”

The nurse said the care home couldn’t transfer her to the hospital. She asked Plaxton’s permission for the doctor to give her mother “a shot to ease her passing.”

(The nurse didn’t tell Plaxton what ‘the shot’ was. But it very likely was morphine, which is routinely used to relieve severe pain. A high enough dose of morphine slows people’s breathing and hastens their death.)

Plaxton was reeling. She immediately consulted with her sister; together they decided to give consent for the shot. Three hours later their mother was dead.

CONDITION SET TWO: HOSPITAL-CARE-RATIONING GUIDELINES

In mid-March, not long before Plaxton’s mother died, treatment-rationing guidelines for during the pandemic started to proliferate.

For example, on March 21 (https://web.archive.org/web/20200322214226/https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng159) the UK’s National Institute for Clinical Excellence produced its guidelines.

They’re based on a frailty score and on mortality probabilities across different age groups for pneumonia and underlying cardiovascular or respiratory diseases.

On March 23 the paper (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32202722/?from_single_result=fair+allocation+of+scarce+medical+resources+in+the+time+of+covid-19&expanded_search_query=fair+allocation+of+scarce+medical+resources+in+the+time+of+covid-19) “Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19” was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine. The paper’s first recommendation calls for:



"maximizing the number of patients that survive treatment with a reasonable life expectancy.”

(Interestingly, the paper’s lead author, Ezekiel Emmanuel, MD, PhD, is an oncologist, bioethicist and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. The centre is secretive about its funders but according to a 2011 investigation in The Nation (https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/corporate-influence-center-american-progress/) its supporters included dozens of giant corporations ranging from Boeing to Walmart. Today, retired general Wesley Clark and executive VP of global investment firm Blackstone Henry James (https://www.blackstone.com/the-firm/our-people) are among the organization’s trustee advisory board members (https://www.americanprogress.org/american-progress-trustee-advisory-board/).)

On March 27, the equally influential Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published “A framework for rationing ventilators and critical-care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic.” (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2763953)

The paper’s authors assert that:



[I]"[y]ounger individuals should receive priority, not because of any claims about social worth or utility, but because they are the worst off, in the sense that they have had the least opportunity to live through life’s stages.”

Ontario Health published guidelines for hospital-treatment rationing on March 28, albeit not publicly. (To this day the government hasn’t made the protocol public, nor disclosed whether or when they implemented it.)

At that time a crush of COVID-19 patients crowding Ontario hospitals wasn’t a realistic possibility for at least the short or medium terms (contrary to the pandemic-curve theoretical modelling), because all elective hospital procedures and surgeries had been cancelled or indefinitely postponed.

Toronto Star reporter Jennifer Yan obtained a copy of the Ontario treatment-triaging document and wrote in a March 29 article (https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2020/03/29/ontario-developing-last-resort-guidelines-on-which-patients-to-prioritize-if-hospitals-are-overwhelmed-by-critical-covid-19-cases.html) that:



"[u]nder the triage protocol, long-term-care patients who meet specific criteria will also no longer be transferred to hospitals.”


Then on April 10, the Canadian Medical Association (https://policybase.cma.ca/en/viewer?file=%2Fdocuments%2FPolicypdf%2FPD20-03.pdf) adopted all the recommendations by Dr. Ezekiel and his co-authors in their New England Journal of Medicine paper, and advised Canadian physicians to follow them.

The Canadian Medical Association statement (whose authors were not listed) asserted that “the current situation, unfortunately, does not allow for” the time for Canadian experts to create their own recommendations.

This is tendentious. Canadian healthcare providers and researchers have access to as much information about COVID-19 as do others around the world. In addition, many had direct clinical experience with a close cousin of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV, in 2003 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92462/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK92462.pdf).

Indeed four Canadians co-authored an ethical framework for guiding decision-making during a pandemic that was based on their experience with SARS and published in 2006 (https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1472-6939-7-12). They made no mention of age as a criterion for treatment triaging in that framework.

On April 17 the Canadian federal government released information (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/health-professionals/covid-19-pandemic-guidance-health-care-sector.html#a45) to guide clinicians in rationing healthcare resources during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Unlike at least some other COVID-19-related guidelines (https://www.canada.ca/en/centre-occupational-health-safety/news/2020/04/covid-19-guidance-for-high-risk-and-essential-workplaces.html) issued in the same period, it was not accompanied by a press release; therefore it has flown under the public radar.

The document includes an emphasis on age-based rationing. It also explicitly discourages transfer of care-home residents to hospitals:



"Long term care (LTC)[care-home] facilities and home care services will be encouraged to care for COVID-19 patients in place and may be asked to take on additional non-COVID-19 patients/clients to help relieve pressure on hospitals”

This is underlined in another place in the document:



"If COVID-19 does develop in LTC facility residents, they should be cared for within the facility if at all possible, to preserve hospital capacity.”


Prohibiting transfer to hospital drastically narrows the treatment options available to care-home residents.

There have been transfers of care-home residents to hospitals in Canada during the COVID-19 crisis, but until very recently (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-how-shoring-up-hospitals-for-covid-19-contributed-to-canadas-long/) they have been by far the exception.

(Instead, starting in mid-March as part of the clearing out of hospitals to make room for a putative surge in COVID-19 patients, thousands of elderly people were transferred from hospitals to care homes. This likely also contributed to the care-home death toll. More than one journalist has compared care homes (https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/analysis-how-montreals-chslds-mirrored-the-diamond-princess-outbreak/) to the Diamond Princess cruise ship: virus incubators with people trapped inside.)

All of this may well be why Plaxton was told by nurses at the care home that her mother couldn’t be transferred to hospital.

This also has played out at other care homes.

The medical director of the Pinecrest (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-covid-19-kills-nine-infects-34-staff-at-bobcaygeon-nursing-home/) nursing home in Bobcaygeon, two hours’ drive northeast of Toronto, strongly advised residents’ family members against considering hospital transfer.

The Globe and Mail reported (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-covid-19-kills-nine-infects-34-staff-at-bobcaygeon-nursing-home/) on March 29 that Dr. Michelle Snarr wrote families on March 21 (which was the day after three of the home’s residents tested positive for SARS-CoV-2) and raised the spectre of significant suffering and possible death if the elderly people were put on ventilators.

Dr. Snarr reiterated this in a March 30 television interview (https://www.cp24.com/news/nine-residents-of-bobcaygeon-long-term-care-home-die-following-covid-19-outbreak-1.4873985?cache=yes%3FclipId%3D64268%3FclipId%3D375756%3FclipId%3D89578).



[B]Once we heard it was COVID, we all knew it was going to run like wildfire through the facility […] The reason I sent the email was to give them a heads-up that this is not normal times. Under normal times, we would send people to the hospital if that was the family’s wishes, but we knew that was not going to be possible, knowing that so many people were going to all get sick at once and also knowing the only way to save a life from COVID is with a ventilator. And to put a frail, elderly person on a ventilator, that’s cruel.



[I][....continued]

_________________________

Related: WHO Guidelines on COVID-19 death definition

https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19-20200420-EN.pdf?ua=1

[Tintin]

[...continued]

Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose? by Rosemary Frei
Source: OffGuardian (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/26/were-conditions-for-high-death-rates-at-care-homes-created-on-purpose/)

___________________

The last death attributed to COVID-19 at Pinecrest occurred on April 8; by then, 29 of the home’s 65 residents had perished.

“I’ve never had four deaths in a day at any nursing home I’ve worked at,” Dr. Stephen Oldridge, one of the physicians working at the home, was quoted as saying in the March 29 Globe and Mail article. “You feel helpless. Because there’s nothing you can do other than support them, give them morphine and make them comfortable.”

Dr. Oldridge told CBC (https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1718938179542) a similar narrative on April 1:



“There is no vaccine, we have no effective treatment other than supportive care for these folks, and obviously there’s no cure. So when the infection takes hold in their lungs, in this elderly population we can just make them comfortable.”

Still other media reports (https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/covid-19-long-term-care-1.5519657) indicate that care-home residents’ families in Canada have denied the option of transfer to hospital during the pandemic even if the residents are relatively young, do not have a DNR, and both they and their families want the option of a transfer. Instead, they are pressured to put DNRs in place. This also is happening elsewhere, such as in the UK (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/12/opposing-lockdown-is-not-profits-before-people/).

Hugh Scher, a Toronto lawyer who’s been involved in some of Canada’s highest-profile end-of-life cases, strongly opposes this. He told the author in a telephone interview:



"The notion that long-term-care-home or nursing-home medical directors can tell residents and their families that they can’t or shouldn’t be transferred to hospital if they need treatment for COVID or anything else – I don’t agree with that.

[…]

[But unfortunately] there’s now an aggressive push to say, ‘Granny’s already ninety-five … and sending her to hospital for a cough or a runny nose isn’t going to improve her underlying condition. And so she should be made comfortable and left to die."

CONDITION SET THREE: NEW RULES SURROUNDING DEATH CERTIFICATES AND REMOVAL AND DISPOSITION OF BODIES

On April 9 the Chief Coroner for Ontario, Dr. Dirk Huyer, released rules for an ‘expedited death response (https://www.sott.net/article/434239-Fog-around-Covid-19-made-thicker-by-new-Ontario-rules-for-handling-deaths)’ in handling and disposition of bodies of people who die in care homes and hospitals.

The stated goal was to prevent infection spread, overburdening of medical staff, and overfilling of hospital morgues and body-storage areas in care homes in the event of a surge in deaths during the pandemic.

The new procedures were created jointly by Dr. Huyer’s office, the Ontario Ministry of Government and Consumer Services and the Bereavement Authority of Ontario (the province’s funeral-home, cremation-services and cemetery self-regulatory body).

They are a drastic sea change in the way deaths are handled in the province. Yet they were launched extremely rapidly with the only “surge” in sight one in mathematical models (https://files.ontario.ca/moh-covid-19-modelling-potential-scenarios-en-2020-04-20.pdf), and a significant body-storage-space problem based on hard data nowhere on the horizon (and still a low probability).

The new procedures went into effect immediately on April 9. Then over the next three days (the Easter long weekend), Dr. Huyer and the registrar of the Bereavement Authority of Ontario led webinars on them for staff of hospitals and care homes across the province.

“We pushed it [writing and releasing the new rules] a little more quickly than maybe was necessary because it’s a brand-new process and there’s thousands of people involved,” Dr. Huyer (https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/2020/05/16/canada-has-been-spared-the-horror-of-temporary-morgues-but-pandemic-expediency-comes-with-a-cost.html) told Toronto Star columnist Rosie DiManno in explaining the haste.

As part of the new rules, the chief coroner’s office now completes the death certificates of every person who dies in long-term-care homes. The office also completes some death certificates of people who die in hospitals. Up until April 9, and for good reason, death certificates in Ontario were filled in by the physicians or nurse practitioners who cared for the people before they died.

In addition, as also noted in ‘Condition Set One’ above, COVID-19-attributed deaths are deemed ‘natural’ by the new rules. And all “natural” deaths are virtually exempt from any further investigations and post-mortems.

(Dr. Huyer was quoted in a May 18 Globe and Mail article (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ontario-coroner-investigates-covid-deaths-in-care-homes-but-cant/) as saying “a number” of COVID-19-attributed death investigations have been started – including that of a man whose daughter believes he died because of neglect at a care home and who asked the coroner’s office to investigate – but that he doesn’t know what that number is.)

Dr. Huyer said, in a phone interview:



“All of these things were added during this period of time to allow not only a timely approach but also an efficient approach to be able to ensure that people proceed to burial or cremation in a timely way without requiring extra storage space,”

Yet it was only 10 months ago that the official report on the high-profile Wettlaufer enquiry (http://longtermcareinquiry.ca/wp-content/uploads/LTCI_Final_Report_Volume1_e.pdf) was released. It calls for many more checks and balances surrounding care – and more rather than less time and transparency in determining and documenting the causes of death.

Just 18 of the report’s 91 recommendations have been implemented. (The inquiry probed the killing in southwestern Ontario by nurse Elizabeth Wettlaufer of eight people, attempted murder of several others and aggravated assault of two more. All but two of the victims were LTCH residents.)

Moreover, the April 2020 rules also dictate that families must contact a funeral home within one hour of a hospital death and within three hours of a care-home death. The bodies are to be taken to the funeral home extremely rapidly, and from there to cremation and burial as quickly as possible.

This journalist wrote about the rules in a May 11 article (https://www.sott.net/article/434239-Fog-around-Covid-19-made-thicker-by-new-Ontario-rules-for-handling-deaths).

Diane Plaxton found and read online the May 11 article. She suddenly understood more of what took place before and after her mother’s April 10 death.

She and this journalist connected, and the May 13 interview ensued.

Plaxton related, in that interview, that three hours after she got off the phone with her dying mother on April 10, a nurse called and matter-of-factly said her mother was dead. She asked Plaxton to call a funeral home.

And about an hour later, while Plaxton was still reeling, another nurse called and again told her to contact a funeral home.

“I got off the phone. That’s when I flew off the handle,” she told the author in the May 13 interview. “It’s like they’re treating her [body] like a piece of garbage: ‘Get her out of here! Ger her out of here!’”

As if that wasn’t enough trauma, at the funeral home four days later she saw COVID-19 listed as the cause of her mother’s death. Plaxton believes what really killed her mother was the combination of dehydration and chronic diseases including asthma; her shortness of breath on April 10 may have been an asthma attack, Plaxton surmises.

Making matters even worse, the funeral director told her she couldn’t take a copy or photo of the ‘Cause of Death (https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.227/bcb.92b.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Managing-Resident-Deaths-and-IPDR-Form_LTC.pdf)’ form. He said she’d have to request a copy from the government and it could take months to arrive.

But the funeral director also commiserated with Plaxton. He was incredulous that her mother had gone from dehydrated to dead so fast. He also was bewildered by the requirements such as bodies having to be picked up in haste and arrangements for cremation and burial also having to be made extremely quickly.

“I’m just taking orders from the top down,” Plaxton recalls the funeral director telling her.

That’s the third of the three sets of conditions that can enable high death rates in care homes.

The three sets are the work of officials, experts and bureaucrats who – while being seen to serve the public interest and who could be unaware of, or oblivious to, the implications of the conditions – may in fact have hidden intentions.

Even if the latter is true, there’s little chance the perpetrators will be caught or punished.

On May 19 the Ontario premier announced that an independent commission (https://news.ontario.ca/mltc/en/2020/05/ontario-announces-independent-commission-into-long-term-care.html) will probe why so many people have died in the province’s care homes. This journalist believes it’s very unlikely the commission’s mandate will include scrutinizing the sets of conditions described in this article.

Perhaps the most elegant element of all is that just one or two people working at any given care home can suffice to translate the sets of conditions into actions – or inaction – that can be deadly for residents. And they’d probably be the only ones held responsible in the unlikely event any of this ever comes to light.

It’s all as simple as one, two, three.

[Gwin Ru]

The Simpsons’ Clip About a “Cat Flu” Was Incredibly Prophetic (https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-simpsons-clip-about-a-cat-flu-was-incredibly-prophetic/)

In a 2010 episode of The Simpsons, a “secret conclave of America’s media empires” releases a deadly virus to “put Americans back where they belong: In dark rooms, glued to their televisions, too terrified to skip the commercials”. Here’s how this clip eerily foreshadows COVID-19.


V5ATxwXSvKo
In 2020, people are begging for a cure for the “Wuhan virus” and are terrified of murder hornets.
jQAIdGMdYg0

[shaberon]

Also, some guidelines bar care-home residents from being transferred to hospital.



This is my question. Is it not standard policy if not the law that if they had infectious disease they were supposed to stay in hospital.

Coupled with the fact that they break the law when it suits them.

And in general, why were they not separated into for instance unused motels?

[Gwin Ru]

French gov't submitting to pressure from pharma labs by banning hydroxychloroquine, politician claims (https://sputniknews.com/analysis/202005291079445505-french-govt-bans-hydroxychloroquine-submitting-to-pressure-from-pharma-labs-politician-claims/)

Sputnik (https://sputniknews.com/analysis/202005291079445505-french-govt-bans-hydroxychloroquine-submitting-to-pressure-from-pharma-labs-politician-claims/)
Fri, 29 May 2020 06:13 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/570501/large/1079366306_0_270_2979_1881_100.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/570501/full/1079366306_0_270_2979_1881_100.jpg)
© REUTERS / Yves Herman


The French government's decision to ban anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine for use in COVID-19 cases goes against French people's interests and rights to get an inexpensive and effective medicine to treat coronavirus, suggests Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, the leader of Debout la France party.

The French government has revoked a decree authorising the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients two days after the World Health Organisation (WHO) halted clinical trials of the drug (https://sputniknews.com/world/202005251079414311-whos-solidarity-trial-to-pause-hydroxychloroquine-tests/) citing potentially dangerous side effects which overweigh the supposed benefits.

The country's health officials approved prescribing the anti-malarial drug, in some coronavirus cases, in late March 2020, when a study by microbiologist Didier Raoult suggested that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin would be efficient in fighting COVID-19. However, the recent research by The Lancet has found that the medicine in question could also cause cardiac toxicity especially if administered with azithromycin (https://sputniknews.com/europe/202005271079431145-france-bans-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-as-treatment-for-covid-19-patients---reports/).

Why French Gov't Bars Hydroxychloroquine
"This is a real state scandal", says Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, the leader of the conservative party Debout la France.

"The French government, because of stupidity or corruption, refuses French citizens treatment with hydroxychloroquine, which can save lives. And I think that the French will soon be outraged, because today this treatment is effective in many countries throughout the world". According to Dupont-Aignan, this particular decision was made by the French authorities under pressure from pharmaceutical labs or vaccine advocates who are looking forward to earning billions if no other therapeutic regimen proves effective.
"Professor Raoul and his treatment regimen is like a little pebble in the boot of large pharmaceutical labs", the politician opines.
Dupont-Aignan hails Donald Trump's decision to withdraw financing from the WHO, arguing that the international entity is being influenced by China far more than the United States.

Previously, the US president, who has long touted hydroxychloroquine as a potent drug against COVID-19 and even said he was taking doses of both hydroxychloroquine and zinc, temporary suspended funding of the WHO. On 19 May, Trump threatened to halt the financing permanently and reconsider the US membership in the organisation if it does not "commit to major substantive improvements in the next 30 days".
"The WHO is influenced by pharmaceutical labs; it has lost credibility", Dupont-Aignan insists.

"The Lancet published a study - fabricated, not true - whose authors want to convince [people] that prescribing chloroquine is dangerous, that it is cardiotoxic... And we can clearly see the shadow of laboratories that want to sell us more expensive drugs or a hypothetical vaccine behind this fight against chloroquine, an inexpensive (almost free) medicine that could save hundreds of thousands of lives". 'Doctor is Free to Prescribe Drugs Suitable for Patient'
However, hydroxychloroquine is not the only drug being used worldwide to support patients suffering from COVID: some health officials have instrumentalised the plasma of Covid-19 survivors and interferon therapy (https://sputniknews.com/analysis/202004191079020506-cuban-biotech-to-the-rescue-the-story-of-a-potential-anti-covid-19-drug-told-by-one-of-its-creators/) to treat patients at the initial stage.
"I don't advocate chloroquine's monopoly", the French politician explains.

"I never insisted on its widespread use. In accordance with the French law of 1921, doctors can prescribe drugs depending on the specific case".
According to him, the problem is that the French government "seeks to impose official medicine".
"I would only welcome other treatments", Dupont-Aignan emphasises.

"I don't advocate chloroquine, but a principled stance. I'm against banning a drug that has proven effective. The doctor is free to consciously prescribe or not prescribe a drug they consider necessary and suitable for the patient. Moreover, for over 70 years, chloroquine has been on the open market in our country. This is not a new drug. It has no contraindications. It just needs to be prescribed reasonably, and that is what doctors should do". Related:


Spain, US & Russia using Hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus while France, Italy and Belgium ban it due to WHO concerns (https://www.sott.net/article/435306-Spain-US-Russia-using-Hydroxychloroquine-to-treat-coronavirus-while-France-Italy-and-Belgium-ban-it-due-to-WHO-concerns)



France revokes decree authorizing use of hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid-19 (https://www.sott.net/article/435242-France-revokes-decree-authorizing-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-treat-Covid-19)



WHO suspends hydroxychloroquine clinical trial, touted by Trump as 'coronavirus cure', stating safety fears (https://www.sott.net/article/435179-WHO-suspends-hydroxychloroquine-clinical-trial-touted-by-Trump-as-coronavirus-cure-stating-safety-fears)



Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Hydroxychloroquine has about 90 percent chance of helping COVID-19 patients (https://www.sott.net/article/434712-Association-of-American-Physicians-and-Surgeons-Hydroxychloroquine-has-about-90-percent-chance-of-helping-COVID-19-patients)

[Kryztian]

In 1917 Rudolf Steiner Foresaw a Vaccine that Would ‘Drive All Inclination Toward Spirituality Out of People’s Souls’
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2020/05/27/in-1917-rudolf-steiner-foresaw-a-vaccine-that-would-drive-all-inclination-toward-spirituality-out-of-peoples-souls/
Dylan Charles, Editor
Waking Times

If you’ve felt at all like you’re in a spiritual war right now, you’re not alone.

https://i.imgur.com/fuMovbw.jpg

Many of the world’s greatest scholars, philosophers and ascetics understood the world to be multi-dimensional and co-inhabited by non-physical beings both good and evil, always at war with us and each other.

It’s not something that can be rightly explained with language or science. One must cultivate such sensitivity that the existence of spiritual beings can be directly experienced.
Rudolf Steiner was an Austrian philosopher, educator, and spiritualist, and over the course of his life he published numerous books and papers on the science of spirituality. He viewed the human body as a spiritual vessel, open to occupation by other entities.

To be conscious of these forces was to have the power to reject their negative influence. To remain unconscious of them was to be a leaf in their wind, and spiritual cultivation was the key to developing conscious awareness of them.


The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

If people express the natural human inclination toward spiritual growth, they free themselves from fear and anxiety, and effectively develop a sort of immunity to the influences of negative entities. If not, our vibration attracts hostile spirits and we fall unconsciously unto their influence.


There are beings in the spiritual realms for whom anxiety and fear emanating from human beings offer welcome food. When humans have no anxiety and fear, then these creatures starve… If fear and anxiety radiates from people and they break out in panic, then these creatures find welcome nutrition and they become more and more powerful. These beings are hostile towards humanity.

Everything that feeds on negative feelings, on anxiety, fear and superstition, despair or doubt, are in reality hostile forces in supersensible worlds, launching cruel attacks on human beings, while they are being fed. Therefore, it is above all necessary to begin with that the person who enters the spiritual world overcomes fear, feelings of helplessness, despair and anxiety. But these are exactly the feelings that belong to contemporary culture and materialism; because it estranges people from the spiritual world, it is especially suited to evoke hopelessness and fear of the unknown in people, thereby calling up the above mentioned hostile forces against them.” ~Rudolf Steiner

With such profound global fear, anxiety, and panic over the present pandemic, many are exposing their own spiritual sicknesses and acquiescing to any recommended behavior or intervention that might alleviate these emotions. Along with this is the push to vaccinate 7 billion healthy people.

Nearly 100 years ago, in a series of 14 essays published under the title, The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness, Steiner issued a warning to future generations about a possible measure of mass control, quite similar to the visions presented by Orwell and Huxley. Steiner foresaw a future when vaccines could steal our spiritual nature.

First, some background:


“In these fourteen lectures, given at the end of 1917 following four years of war in Europe, Steiner speaks on the complex spiritual forces behind the World War I, humanity’s attempts to build theoretically perfect social orders, and the many divisions and disruptions that would continue on Earth into our own time. Humanity in general was asleep to the fact that fallen spirits, cast from the spiritual worlds, had become intensely active on Earth. This manifested mainly in human thinking and perception of the surrounding world. ” [Source] (https://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA177/English/RSP1993/FalDar_index.html)

The fall into such destructive slumber would be marked by an age of materialism and centralization of power, during which the influences of ‘spirits of darkness’ would inspire humans to devise new technologies and new means of oppression. Steiner comments:


I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination toward spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life – ‘foolish’ here, or course, in the eyes of materialists. . . .

. . . a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination toward spiritual ideas to develop and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses. Out of impulses which the medical profession gained from presumption – oh, I beg your pardon, from the consumption [tuberculosis] they themselves suffered – people are now vaccinated against consumption, and in the same way they will be vaccinated against any inclination toward spirituality. This is merely to give you a particularly striking example of many things which will come in the near and more distant future in this field – the aim being to bring confusion into the impulses which want to stream down to earth after the victory of the [Michaelic] spirits of light [in 1879].” ~Rudolf Steiner

Steiner was talking only about vaccines here. His comment does not consider the compounded effects on human spirituality of the many myriad influences we have in our world today, all of which work against spiritual connection on their own right.

Again, if you’ve felt at all like you’re in a spiritual war, you’re not alone.

[Kryztian]

Pandemic is chance to reset global economy, says Prince Charles

Prince of Wales unveils a five-point plan to stimulate sustainable economic growth
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/03/pandemic-is-chance-to-reset-global-economy-says-prince-charles?CMP=share_btn_fb

https://i.imgur.com/TYRLBGT.jpg?1

The recovery from the coronavirus crisis represents an opportunity to reset the global economy and prioritise sustainable development without further damaging the planet, Prince Charles said at the opening of a World Economic Forum (WEF) virtual meeting.

Outlining a five-point plan to rebuild economies following a global recession, the 71-year-old prince said the pandemic was the result of a breakdown in the link between humanity and nature that could be corrected by recognising “the interdependence of all living things”.

The prince emphasised that the private sector would be the engine of recovery and was heartened by the pledges from business leaders to recognise the damage to the environment that would result from an unfettered dash for growth.

“We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path,” said Charles, who himself has recovered after suffering mild symptoms of Covid-19.

He said that the pandemic, which has forced governments worldwide to mothball their economies, had showed people that dramatic change was possible.

“We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis. Its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change,” he added.

The five points he outlined were:


To capture the imagination and will of humanity – change will only happen if people really want it.


The economic recovery must put the world on the path to sustainable employment, livelihoods and growth. Longstanding incentive structures that have had perverse effects on our planetary environment and nature herself must be reinvented


Systems and pathways must be redesigned to advance net zero transitions globally. Carbon pricing can provide a critical pathway to a sustainable market.


Science, technology and innovation need re-invigorating. Humanity is on the verge of catalytic breakthroughs that will alter our view of what it possible and profitable in the framework of a sustainable future.


The WEF, which stages an influential annual gathering of business and political leaders at its annual meeting in the Swiss ski resort of Davos, has come under fire from anti-poverty groups in recent years for failing to tackle climate change and executive pay.

Charles’s speech was part of a launch event for The Great Reset, a project involving the WEF and the Prince of Wales’s Sustainable Markets Initiative, aimed at rebuilding the economic and social system to be more sustainable.

Speaking at the same event, International Monetary Fund boss Kristalina Georgieva said the world economy faced a similar situation to the UK in the second world war. She urged global leaders to recognise the success of the 1942 Beveridge report, which put forward reforms to raise welfare and health standards across Britain, and was ready to be implemented when the war was over.

“That led to a better country after the war and to a National Health Service that is saving so many lives today. We have to use all the strength we have to turn a page and have history be about the Great Reset and not the Great Reversal.”

She added: “The best memorial we can build to those who have lost their lives is a greener, smarter, fairer world.”


Investment must be rebalanced. Accelerating green investments can offer job opportunities in green energy, the circular and bio-economy, eco-tourism and green public infrastructure.

[shaberon]

We found one instance of cozy-ness with Moderna, with financial affairs that are likely to be scrutinzed by the SEC. That was just one day, and before that, here is another "day in the life of"--agenda--or business as usual--in the questionable vaccine (https://www.globalresearch.ca/rushing-vaccine-market-virus/5715046) industry:

It wasn’t the first time Moderna’s stock had skyrocketed on a well-timed press release. On February 24th, the World Health Organization said to prepare for a global pandemic, collapsing stock markets around the world. Most stocks collapsed, but Moderna’s shot up by nearly 30%, after it reported on February 25th that testing on humans would begin in March. Mega-investors made tens of millions of dollars in a single day, including BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, which made $68 million just on February 25th.



On that size and scale, I am afraid there is something really, really big that does not need such easy access to public funds. If we get lost in a ruckus of police and domestic terrorists, this concern will simply vanish, and the same power will simply alter its appearance if it so chooses.

[Gwin Ru]

India stands up to the CDC (https://steemit.com/india/@corbettreport/india-puts-the-cdc-on-notice)

James Corbett
Corbett Report (https://steemit.com/india/@corbettreport/india-puts-the-cdc-on-notice)
Sat, 06 Jun 2020 18:30 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/571563/large/nif_indiacdc.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/571563/full/nif_indiacdc.jpg)
© Corbett Report


Flying completely under the radar of the various crises that have come to define 2020, an interesting story is playing out in India. This story shines a light on the increasingly globalized nature of medical research and on the dark practice of using poor people in third world nations as guinea pigs in that research.

In early May, the US Centers for Disease Creation and Propaganda (CDC) announced (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/us-cdc-commits-3-6-million-to-indias-covid-19-fight/articleshow/75698811.cms) a $3.6 million grant to "further strengthen and support the Indian government's efforts to increase laboratory capacity for SARS-COV-2 testing." But just days later, it was reported that the grant may be delayed (https://archive.is/fgejm) because the CDC was placed on a "watch list" by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs last December.

Wait, what? The Indian government placed the CDC on a "watch list" last year? Why?

Well, according to The Hindustan Times (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/halt-nipah-project-with-indian-lab-govt-tells-us-health-agency/story-kRn55L1TJJKqUkUcsmXChK.html), the Indian government specifically asked the CDC to "stop funding research in India without government approval" after they discovered that the US health agency had helped an under-qualified Indian research facility to study a potential bioweapon. The facility in question — the Manipal Centre for Virus Research — was researching the Nipah virus (https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/nipah/index.html), a so-called "Risk Group 4 (https://prod.wp.cdn.aws.wfu.edu/sites/208/2014/08/ehs-nih-risk-groups.pdf)" (RG4) pathogen that is "likely to cause serious or lethal human disease for which preventive or therapeutic interventions are not usually available."

Given their extremely dangerous nature, RG4 pathogens can only be handled in special "biological safety level 4 (https://www.sepsservices.com/biosafety-levels-1-4-whats-the-difference/)" (BSL4) laboratories. BSL4 labs are completely sealed off from the outside, with dedicated supply and exhaust air systems and rigorous procedures for decontaminating all personnel and materials leaving the building. As a result, BSL4 laboratories are very rare, with only a handful of facilities in the world able to meet the stringent security protocols. Like the Wuhan Institute of Virology (https://pharma-industry-review.com/biosafety-level-4-laboratory-wuhan-institute-of-virology-china).

. . . Oh, wait.

Well, anyway, the key point is that the Manipal Centre for Virus Research (MCVR) is a BSL2 facility, not a BSL4 laboratory, and thus was not cleared to be working with Nipah virus at all. So how did the researchers at the MCVR get their hands on the viral samples? And how did they get the funding for their research?

The illegal research was uncovered after the coronavirus panic prompted the Indian government to order a review of biological weapons grade pathogens in the country. That review discovered that the CDC was funding a training program at the MCVR to detect and diagnose Nipah virus, and that the US agency was secretly funding the program in violation of India's Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010 (https://fcraonline.nic.in/home/PDF_Doc/FC-RegulationAct-2010-C.pdf). The bold, illegal scheme was laid out in an internal government report titled "Unapproved, US-funded Indian Laboratory stored samples of Nipah Virus - a bioterrorism agent."

The Hindustan Times report (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/halt-nipah-project-with-indian-lab-govt-tells-us-health-agency/story-kRn55L1TJJKqUkUcsmXChK.html) includes a startling accusation from one unnamed Indian government official:
"Our apprehension is that the lab was being used to map the Nipah virus, which can be used to develop a vaccine, the intellectual property right of which [sic] will not be with India. Importantly, understanding how the human body reacted to the virus will also produce a more virulent form of virus for biological warfare." That's right, folks. For some reason, the US CDC was secretly funding a research program into a highly dangerous weapons-grade biological pathogen at an under-qualified research facility in India.

Even more incredibly, this isn't the first time that the CDC has been accused of nefarious biowarfare activity (https://greatgameindia.com/1994-surat-plague-bioterrorism/) in the country. In 1994, an outbreak of bubonic and pneumonic plague hit south-central and western India, causing 693 cases of the disease and 56 deaths. The loss of life may have been relatively small, but the panic surrounding the event was unprecedented. 300,000 people fled the plague-stricken city of Surat in two days, the largest post-independence migration of Indians in history, and the Indian economy suffered a $600 million hit.

Upon further inspection, however, questions began to emerge (https://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20000525/edit.htm#7) about whether the outbreak had really been the plague at all. Writing about the questions surrounding the recent coronavirus panic, a journalist in the Indian publication THE WEEK wrote (https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2020/01/31/genie-from-a-war-lab.html):
"During the 1994 plague outbreak in Surat and Beed, it was found that the germs had an extra protein ring which could only have been inserted artificially. Indian scientists had raised concerns about a US biowar experiment having gone awry. THE WEEK had carried reports giving details of germ war research being carried on in labs under the Centre for Disease Control in Atlanta and about a newly developed germ detector being tested. The US embassy had denied the allegations." Yes, perhaps the only surprising thing about this latest Nipah virus scandal is that the Indian government had the gumption to call the CDC out on their illegal activity and even to delay cashing a big juicy bribe check from the agency just to smooth things over.

You see, ever since it was effectively conquered by the British East India Company in the 18th century, India has been used as a giant open-air laboratory for the would-be social engineers of the ruling oligarchy.

The Company began its conquests in the mid-18th century and gradually expanded military, political and economic control over India. At the height of the East India Company's power, the nation of India had effectively become the plaything of a private corporation. As historian William Dalrymple writes (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/04/east-india-company-original-corporate-raiders):
"We still talk about the British conquering India, but that phrase disguises a more sinister reality. It was not the British government that seized India at the end of the 18th century, but a dangerously unregulated private company headquartered in one small office, five windows wide, in London, and managed in India by an unstable sociopath - [Robert] Clive." Fast forward a century or two and India is still the plaything of multinational corporations. The much-touted "Green Revolution" of the 1950s and 1960s, for example — a set of technology transfer initiatives designed to "modernize" agricultural practices in developing countries by selling them American-made machinery running on petrochemicals — not only exacerbated the problems faced by landless peasants in India, but actually slowed the growth (http://rupe-india.org/35/app1.html) of agricultural production in the country. The seed cartels and agricultural giants like Monsanto that colonized the country in the wake of this "Green Revolution" have left their own scar on India in the form of an epidemic of suicides (https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-seeds-of-suicide-how-monsanto-destroys-farming/5329947) committed by farmers saddled with unpayable debts.

In the current era, however, the privatization of India is done not by the corporations directly, but under the guise of "philanthropy" by nongovernmental organizations and private foundations.

Viewers of Who Is Bill Gates? (https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/) will already know some of the lowlights of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's involvement in India. From the national vaccination schedule (https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/conflict-of-interest-nhm-panel-raises-questions-on-bill-gates-foundation/) to the national biometric identification scheme (https://www.corbettreport.com/the-worlds-largest-democratic-biometric-prison/) (Aadhaar) to the country's headlong rush towards a mobile digital payment system (https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-313-demonetization-and-you/), there is no aspect of the modern Indian state that does not bear the fingerprints of Gates or one of his minions. In fact, such was the concern over the way that the Gates Foundation was influencing India's vaccination strategy on behalf of Gates' Big Pharma buddies that the Indian government was forced to cut all financial ties (https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/centre-shuts-gate-on-bill-melinda-gates-foundation/articleshow/57028697.cms) between the foundation and the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X10002094) — the primary body advising New Delhi on all vaccination-related matters.

But, contrary to the headlines that have been generated in the alt media that the Gates Foundation has been "kicked out" of the country, the relationship between the Indian government and Gates is as close as ever. In fact, so close is the relationship that the Gates Foundation actually operates an "India Office (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Where-We-Work/India-Office/About-the-India-Office)," which "operates as a branch office with permission of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and is appropriately registered under Indian law."

The reason that India continues to be a rich target for the likes of the Gates Foundation is that it provides an easily accessible testing ground for medical research and its large population provides ready markets for Big Pharma vaccines and other products. As Samiran Nundy, editor emeritus of the National Medical Journal of India, observed (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/09/indian-parliament-comes-down-hard-cervical-cancer-trial) regarding a scandal surrounding an HPV vaccine study in the country that committed "gross violations" of consent, "This is an obvious case where Indians were being used as guinea pigs."

The Indian people, and poor people across Asia and Africa, have been used as human guinea pigs by medical researchers, social engineers and agents of empire for centuries. It should come as no surprise that the US CDC has been caught with their hand in the India cookie jar, funding secret bioweapon development research in the country without the government's knowledge or consent. The only question now is whether the Indian government is willing to cash their $3.6 million "coronavirus research" bribe and look the other way, or stick to their guns and kick the CDC out of the country for good.

[shaberon]

That is a serious point about the East India Company. Untold fortune was looted, and India was yet rewarded by things like the Amritsar Massacre. Pretty clear picture of unregulated capitalism in action.

If they perhaps thought the U. S. was a better option and see their agriculture converted into frankenfoods and their medical centers exploited by a U. N. agency, they would appear to be in a pretty strong position to challenge capitalism and the United Nations.

However we have been told on this forum at least that there is a massive rank of Indians who are sellouts in a game of corruption.

It is also correct the 1994 plague outbreak caused an intra-Indian crisis similar to the global one of today.

Currently they seem to be finding this is not that deadly, except in the slums.

We have a lot in common, since, the workhorses of the "system" were #1--India, #2--U. S., obviously reasons to disfavor it in both places.

[greybeard]

Dr Rashid Buttar The Media Won’t tell us the Truth|IT'S HAPPENING RIGHT NOW! SHARE NOW!
https://www.AskDrButtar.com/livestream


Special Thanks to Forever Inspired
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFCt...

Why Did The Media Not Talk About This | Dr Rashid A Buttar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoKym...
------------------------------------------------------------------

We have UNDERCOVER FOOTAGE IT’S TIME TO MAKE THIS PUBLIC |Dr Rashid Buttar|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hch33...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr Rashid Buttar THEY WILL BAN THIS IMMEDIATELY! (URGENT) PLEASE SHARE NOW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3DCA...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr Rashid Buttar Your Life Depends on this information Please Share
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC4XG...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Rashid Buttar URGENT! Full Disclosure From INSIDE| HR 6666 IS COMING!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-7UK...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr Rashid Buttar The SHOCKING REVELATION the Media won’t talk about SHARE before they Censor this!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-b5U...
------------------------------------------------------------------

The Long Anticipated Part 6 of "Covid-19 Conspiracy?” Series: Episode 4 of 4 | Dr Rashid A Buttar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvBzM...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Covid-19 Virus Conspiracy? Truth About Corona Virus: Part 1- Dr. Rashid A. Buttar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ3rh...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashid A. Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM: Dr. Rashid A. Buttar received his undergraduate degree from Washington University in St. Louis with a double major in Biology and Theology at age 21, and then attended medical school at the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery in Des Moines, Iowa, graduating with his medical degree at age 25. He trained in General Surgery and Emergency Medicine and served as Brigade Surgeon for 2nd Infantry Division, Republic of South Korea, and later as Chief of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Moncrief Army Community Hospital at Ft. Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina while serving in the US Army.

Dr. Buttar became an Eagle Scout at the age of 14, becoming the youngest person in the US to get his Eagle that year, and made the list for promotion to Major in the US Army at the age of 28, becoming the youngest person to make the list for Major that year in the US Army just prior to finishing his service in the Armed Forces. During his military career, Dr. Buttar had the privilege of serving with and being attached to the 2nd Infantry Division, the 101st Air Assault Division and the 5th Special Forces Group. Dr. Buttar is board certified and a Diplomate in Clinical Metal Toxicology and Preventive Medicine, is board eligible in Emergency Medicine and has achieved fellowship status in three separate medical organizations (Fellow of the American College for Advancement in Medicine, Fellow of the American Academy of Preventive Medicine, and Fellow of the American Association of Integrative Medicine).

Dr. Buttar now serves as the Medical Director for the Centers for Advanced Medicine with clinics on the east and west coast. The Centers specialize in the treatment and needs of patients refractory to conventional treatments and who have failed the standard approach to their disease process. With a special emphasis on the interrelationship between environmental toxicity and the insidious disease processes and the “up-regulation” of the immune system, the Center has attracted patients from 89 different countries suffering from autism, cancer, heart disease, stroke and many other conditions too numerous to list.
#DrRashidAButtar #AdvancedMedicine #WeChangeTheWorld




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7IVTUszmMY

[avid]

None of those links work, youtube censorship - oops, something went wrong 😡

[greybeard]

None of those links work, youtube censorship - oops, something went wrong 😡

The main one still does, but as you say the rest do not.
Chris

[onawah]

Lancet & NEJM Retract Studies Finding HCQ Deadly & Ineffective
Medical Scandal of the Decade Erupts as Lancet and NEJM Both Retract Studies Finding Hydroxychloriquine Deadly and Ineffective
Politicized Science: Lancet, NEJM retract studies on HydroxychloriquineSee:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/06/politicized-science-lancet-nejm-retract/

COPIED AND PASTED HERE : http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109824-Covid-19--and-flu---Treatment-and-Prevention&p=1360087&viewfull=1#post1360087

[onawah]

Vaccination: how the West invades the world
by Jon Rappoport
June 8, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/08/vaccination-how-the-west-invades-world/

“A great wave of missionaries brings a fairy tale to the Third World. These outsiders are the priests in white coats. They offer medical treatments for problems they can’t possibly solve. The self-generated delusions of the doctors about their ‘success’ are stupendous.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Vaccination is the prow, the leading edge of the invasion.

Convincing nations that vaccines are absolutely essential opens the way for all the other practices of Western medicine. Especially mass drugging.

In recent years (think Swine Flu, SARS and other fake epidemics — including COVID-19), the World Health Organization has played a major role in insisting—with threats of sanctions and quarantines and travel advisories—that nations vaccinate their citizens to the hilt, in order to protect the world against “the deadly spread of viruses.”

The WHO wields significant power in this regard. It is a pharmaceutical enforcer.

There is a hidden aspect of the vaccination-invasion: the local political leaders of “backward” nations stand to gain from the vaccine ruse.

Instead of having to admit they are causing widespread death and devastation by maintaining poverty, hunger, starvation, unsanitary overcrowded living conditions, and contaminated water supplies—all of this on purpose, in order to keep their populations weak and under control—the leaders in those countries can say:

“Our people are suffering from specific diseases, over which we have no control. We are afflicted with viruses. We must take steps. We must upgrade our medical care programs. The first step is instituting widespread vaccination against viruses.”

This con lets them off the hook. This con is a cover story that obscures what these leaders are actually doing to their own people. This con obscures the fact that, when living conditions are execrable and miserable, disease arises independent of what particular germs are circulating. The imposed conditions of life destroy immune systems, period.

Vaccination, as a “bonus” for repressive leaders, actually makes things much worse for populations. It pushes already weakened immune systems (and healthy systems, too) over the edge.

Consider also how mega-corporations benefit.

After making deals with local dictators to set up shop, hire workers for pennies a day, steal land and resources—keeping populations weak, sick, debilitated, and therefore less able to rebel against the outright theft of their countries—these corporations also have a built-in cover story:

“It’s shame what’s happening to the people here, all this disease. Therefore, we wholly support bringing in medical aid, to stem the tide…”

As if doctors and drugs and vaccines could cure the destruction wrought by abject poverty and starvation.

The degree of brainwashing propaganda about the miracle of medicine is extraordinary.

People watch/read news stories about doctors and medical supplies going to impoverished countries, and casually assume there is some connection between that and bringing health to millions of people.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

“Yes, I see you’ve been hungry for 20 years. Here is a drug. And roll up your tattered sleeve for 10 vaccines.”

Any doctor worth his salt understands these things. He knows. He knows he is being used as a prop in a fantasy stage production of The Cure: A Great Deception.

The man in the white coat comes to dinner, but there is no dinner.

“Hello. I represent a few mega-corporations who, in conjunction with your leaders, have stolen your country from you, taken the best farm land, the richest minerals, and put you to work at starvation wages. Therefore, you’re sick. So now I’m going to help you with a shot in the arm that will do nothing to raise your level of health. But I’ll pretend it will.”

Many years ago, in my college bulletin, a young doctor wrote a piece about his experiences in Africa. He grasped a fraction of the truth. He mentioned that severe dehydration/diarrhea was a leading cause of death there, but the medical people refused to give out simple packs that would at least, for the moment, rehydrate the sufferers. Instead, they insisted on administering antibiotics—which of course made the problem worse by killing off beneficial gut bacteria.

Thirty years later, while I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I got a call from a doctor who had set up a small AIDS clinic in Uganda. He simply gave his patients clean rooms and nutritious food, and helped them start a little farm, where they grew beans and sold them. That’s all.

He said to me, “All their AIDS symptoms went away. What do I do now?”

The first thing he could do was realize that HIV was a stupendous cover story to explain “why so many people in Africa were sick.”

He was something close to a healer, and he had done his job well. But because of his indoctrination, he didn’t know it.

When experts rattle on about how vaccination has wiped out many diseases in the Third World, what they really mean is: vaccines have suppressed the visible symptoms that lead to the diagnosis of these diseases. But new symptoms will arise, and they will be called other disease-names. It’s a shell game.

I challenge anyone to show me large, correctly done studies that track people in the Third World who have received the usual batches of vaccines. Show me that the overall health level of these people has improved over time.

In other words, show me that people who are chronically affected by hunger, starvation, contaminated water, and unsanitary overcrowded living conditions are somehow enjoying improved health because they were given shots in the arm.

“Well, when you put it that way…”

I do put it that way. Because that’s the way it is.

All the laudatory verbiage about the unparalleled success of vaccines in the Third World is just more illusion, more cover story, more diversion.

The invasion is ongoing.

The invaders are the same people and the same groups who are going to try to inject every human on Earth with a COVID-19 vaccine.

So you trust them, right? And you won’t resist them, right?

RIGHT?"

[onawah]

Newborns To Be Separated From Parents for COVID-19 Testing
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 09, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/09/newborns-and-coronavirus.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20200609Z1&et_cid=DM560686&et_rid=890338523

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In an April 30, 2020, GatesNotes post, Bill Gates states he suspects “the COVID-19 vaccine will become part of the routine newborn immunization schedule”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is recommending newborns be tested for COVID-19 twice within the first 48 hours, and separated from mothers with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
Only three pediatric deaths from alleged COVID-19 illness have been reported in the U.S. as of April 2, 2020
Early separation has been proven to cause emotional and neurobiological problems well into adulthood
Phase 1 human trials have begun for a few different COVID-19 vaccines. In the Moderna trial, one of the subjects developed a fever “of more than 103 degrees” Fahrenheit, fainted, and reported feeling “more sick than he ever has before” after his second dose


The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest funder of vaccines in the entire world and, according to Gates, its COVID-19 vaccination effort “dwarfs anything we’ve ever worked on before.”1 Indeed, Gates push for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination — and investment in those vaccines — is historically unprecedented.

In an April 30, 2020, GatesNotes post,2,3 Gates even states he “suspect[s] the COVID-19 vaccine will become part of the routine newborn immunization schedule.” In other words, a novel vaccine that alters your DNA and RNA — turning your body into an antigen-producing factory — will be given to newborns, if Gates has his way.

What could possibly go wrong? If history tells us anything, we know that just about anything could or will go wrong if the CDC mandates the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine on the newborn vaccine schedule.

Considering the vast majority of COVID-19 deaths occur in the elderly, why would babies, who are the absolutely lowest at-risk age group, need mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 in the first place? There’s absolutely no evidence to suggest vaccinating babies would prevent them from spreading the virus if infected, or develop lifelong immunity.

Newborns To Be Tested and Separated From Infected Mothers
In related, beyond ludicrous news,4 the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is now recommending5 newborns be tested for COVID-19 — not just once, but twice — and separated from mothers with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. As reported by CBSN Pittsburgh May 26, 2020:6

“’The recommendation is the baby be tested sometime around 24 hours after birth. And if the test is negative, they’re recommending a second test at 48 hours,’ says Dr. Paul Weinbaum, an obstetrician at the Allegheny Health Network. And these babies must be kept apart.

‘The baby should not only be separated from other babies but perhaps separated from the mother if that’s feasible,’ he said … If the baby’s tests are negative, the separation is over. But what happens if a baby tests positive? ‘They don’t recommend keeping these babies in the hospital,’ says Dr. Weinbaum.”

Early Separation Can Have Lasting Psychological Effects
If you ask me, separating newborns from their mothers due to SARS-CoV-2 infection (especially if it’s only “suspected”) appears not only unnecessary at best but foolhardy and cruel at worst — especially in light of the fact that only three pediatric deaths from alleged COVID-19 illness have been reported7 in the U.S., and the fact that such separation has been proven to cause emotional and neurobiological problems well into adulthood. As stated in a 2018 article in Psychological Science:8

“The attachment bond between a mother and her child is first formed in the womb, where fetuses have been found to develop preferential responses to maternal scents and sounds that persist after birth …

These rapid early-learning processes continue during the newborn stage of development, in which children begin to recognize their mothers’ faces and voices.

From this point on, early maternal separation can result in a series of traumatic emotional reactions during which the child engages in an anxious period of calling and active search behavior followed by a period of declining behavioral responsiveness.

In a study of infant rats, [Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychology director Myron] Hofer found that this behavior was largely a response to the loss of warmth a child receives through bodily contact, nutrients, and other physiological interactions with its mother …

The research suggests that withdrawing maternal support early in a child’s life can have a number of physiological and behavioral consequences that may contribute to a complex, changing pattern of vulnerability over the life span …”

Such findings are not entirely new. According to a 2011 study9 published in Biological Psychiatry, evidence shows “separating infants from their mother is stressful to the baby.” As reported by Science Daily:10

“Researchers measured heart rate variability in 2-day-old sleeping babies for one hour each during skin-to-skin contact with mother and alone in a cot next to mother's bed. Neonatal autonomic activity was 176% higher and quiet sleep 86% lower during maternal separation compared to skin-to-skin contact.

Dr. John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry, commented on the study's findings: ‘This paper highlights the profound impact of maternal separation on the infant. We knew that this was stressful, but the current study suggests that this is major physiologic stressor for the infant.’"

While that 2011 study claimed to be one of the first providing evidence that separation causes undue stress, other studies have been published since then, showing the same thing.

Examples include another 2011 study,11 which found “mother-child separation of a week or longer within the first two years of life was related to higher levels of child negativity (at age 3) and aggression (at ages 3 and 5),” and that “the effects of separation on children’s aggressive behavior are early and persistent.”

Similarly, a 2012 study that looked at “physical and emotional closeness between the preterm infant and parent in the neonatal intensive care unit” found physical and emotional closeness are “crucial to the physical, emotional and social well-being of both the infant and the parent,” and that such closeness is an important part of healthy infant brain development.

Based on the historical failures to defend against coronaviruses with a vaccine, this could become one of the biggest public health disasters in the history of the world.

COVID-19 Vaccine Likely To Be Riskier Than Most
The COVID-19 vaccine is the most fast-tracked vaccine ever created in history, and some companies are skipping previously required safety testing steps, such as animal testing.12,13

Phase 1 human trials have already begun for a few different COVID-19 vaccines within weeks of the infection hitting the U.S. In the Moderna trial of an experimental coronavirus vaccine,14 one of the subjects developed a fever “of more than 103 degrees” Fahrenheit, fainted, and reported feeling “more sick than he ever has before” after his second dose.15

Moderna and several other competitor vaccine manufacturers are using messenger RNA (mRNA) technology to make their vaccines rather than live or attenuated (inactivated) viruses grown in animal cells.16 (The GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi COVID-19 vaccines, on the other hand, will be produced in insect cells with the dangerous squalene oil adjuvant.17) As explained by The New York Times:18

“… messenger RNA … carries the instructions for cells to make proteins. By injecting a specially designed messenger RNA into the body, the vaccine could potentially tell cells how to make the spike protein of the coronavirus without actually making a person sick.

Because the virus typically uses this protein as a key to unlock and take over lung cells, the vaccine could train a healthy immune system to produce antibodies to fight off an infection … But no vaccine made with this technology for other viruses has ever reached the global market.”

So, not only are we dealing with a novel virus, the mechanics of which are still under debate (some experts are now saying it appears to be a genetically engineered virus that attacks the blood19 more so than the lungs, for example), they’re also fast-tracking experimental RNA-based vaccines that have never been licensed or used in humans before.

As explained in “Fast-Tracked COVID-19 Vaccine — What Could Go Wrong?” previous attempts to create coronavirus vaccines have failed due to coronaviruses triggering production of two different types of antibodies: one that fights disease, and one that triggers paradoxical immune enhancement that often results in very serious disease and/or death when the patient is exposed to the wild virus.

Based on the historical failures to defend against coronaviruses with a vaccine, this could become one of the biggest public health disasters in the history of the world. And, not one of those involved would face any repercussions. Instead, they will all profit from it.

COVID-19 Vaccine Will Alter Your RNA and DNA
I recently interviewed Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), about these fast-tracked vaccines and the simultaneous push to make them mandatory for travel, if not for work and social life in general.

As noted by Fisher, the mRNA vaccines being developed against COVID-19 will alter your RNA and DNA, which is of tremendous concern. As mentioned, the idea behind them is to turn your body into an antigen-manufacturing plant, and if your immune system is hypersensitive, it could overreact, causing severe problems. Considering how many people have autoimmune diseases and allergies, these vaccines could have devastating effects for many.

“When you try to stimulate strong inflammatory responses in the body … what is this going to do to people who don't resolve inflammation in the body and become chronically inflamed and chronically ill and disabled?” Fisher said.

“This is what vaccines do. They stimulate inflammation in the body. They have to in order to provoke an antibody response, but this is atypical. When you're trying to do this in the body, this is not a normal way that the body mounts an inflammatory response to a microbe.

They've turned everything upside down and we are just accepting it. Why are we not thinking critically? Why do people think that they shouldn't really do the research and look at the science and look at what's being done before they take a pharmaceutical product or a vaccine? This is what I don't understand. We've totally given up our critical thinking ability …

I think … you need to get educated, you need to get the accurate facts. Mercola.com and nvic.org, we do our research. We reference all of our information because we want you to have accurate information, and you need to share that information with your family, friends, community leaders and legislators, because the only way that we're going to be able to change government is by electing people who are going to reflect our values and beliefs.”

Does the State Own Your Baby?
As reported in “Children Taken From Parents Who Refuse Vitamin K Shots,” an increasing number of parents question the routine practice of injecting their newborns with vitamin K1, and some hospitals have started harassing and even removing newborns from their parents, calling parents’ refusal of the shot “medical neglect.”20

While vitamin K1 is necessary for newborns, the painful (and potentially toxic) injection is not. You can safely and noninvasively normalize your baby’s vitamin K1 level with oral drops.

In his 1999 paper, “Babies Don’t Feel Pain: A Century of Denial in Medicine,” David B. Chamberlain, Ph.D., a psychologist and co-founder of the Association of Pre-and Perinatal Psychology and Health, wrote:21

“The earlier an infant is subjected to pain, the greater the potential for harm … We must alert the medical community to the psychological hazards of early pain and call for the removal of all man-made pain surrounding birth.”

A 2004 study22 found that very early pain or stress experiences have long-lasting adverse consequences for newborns, including changes in the central nervous system and changes in responsiveness of the neuroendocrine and immune systems at maturity. Similar findings were also published in 2008.23

In 2019, several Illinois families who experienced harassment and investigation by the Division of Children and Families Services over refusal of the vitamin K shot have filed a class action lawsuit against local hospitals (Silver Cross Hospital, Advocate Christ Medical Center and the University of Chicago Medical Center), the American Academy of Pediatrics, DCFS and several pediatricians.24

The fact that doctors, nurses, DCFS workers and state health officials are trying to circumvent parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children is disturbing in the extreme.

Chances are, the fight over who really has control over your children is likely to heat up once again if or when a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available and is added to the federally recommended childhood vaccination schedule, which is being turned into state law in most states. Before the time comes when a COVID-19 vaccine is mandated not only for all children but for all adults, too, I hope you all join us in the fight for freedom of choice.

To prepare, I urge you to sign up for the National Vaccine Information Center’s online Advocacy Portal, a tool you can use to communicate with your elected representatives. This free service monitors vaccine-related state legislation throughout the U.S. and alerts you when proposed bills are moving in your state.

NVIC also provides you with fact-based talking points you can share with your legislators to educate them about the need to protect the legal right to make voluntary decisions about vaccination for yourself and your children."

- Sources and References
1, 2 GatesNotes April 30, 2020
3 BGR May 1, 2020
4, 6 CBSN Pittsburgh May 26, 2020
5 CDC.gov Evaluation and Management Considerations for Neonates at Risk for COVID-19
7 CDC.gov MMWR April 10, 2020; 69(14);422–426
8 Psychological Science June 20, 2018
9 Biological Psychiatry 2011; 70 (9): 817
10 Science Daily November 2, 2011
11 Attach Hum Dev. 2011 Jan; 13(1): 5–26
12 STAT News March 11, 2020
13, 18 New York Times May 5, 2020 (Archived)
14 Moderna May 18, 2020
15 Stat News May 26, 2020
16 The Vaccine Reaction May 3, 2020
17 The Vaccine Reaction May 4, 2020
19 Chemrxiv.org April 27, 2020 COVID-19:Attacks the 1-Beta Chain of Hemoglobin and Captures the Porphyrin to Inhibit Human Heme Metabolism
20 Chicago Tribune September 24, 2019
21 Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, Babies Don’t Feel Pain: A Century of Denial in Medicine
22 The Journal of Perinatal Education 2004 Summer; 13(3): 10–17
23 CMAJ 2008 Jul 1; 179(1): 11–12
24 CBS September 24, 2019

I DOUBT THAT THE PEOPLE WILL STAND FOR THIS, AND IF THEY DO, SOMETHING IS AS WRONG AS WRONG CAN BE...

[greybeard]

People --some of them, will stand for just about anything if they are in fear.
Its push, pull Fear, your baby might die and so will you if you dont take the vaccine -- and you are doing the right thing for your baby and the world when you take the tests and vaccines!!!
Chris

[Gwin Ru]

Jim Stone: (http://82.221.129.208/.vk1.html)
MUST READ: Archbishop Vigano calls out the deep state in a STUNNING letter to Trump (https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/archbishop-viganos-powerful-letter-to-president-trump-eternal-struggle-between-good-and-evil-playing-out-right-now)

It's all in there. The masons, the takeover, the deep state, the "deep church", evil that is a minority slamming the majority by disproportionate influence from positions of power, the scamming media, IT IS ALL THERE. The conspiracy is not theory anymore and Trump has been warned.


------------------------------------


Archbishop Viganò’s powerful letter to President Trump: Eternal struggle between good and evil playing out right now (https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/archbishop-viganos-powerful-letter-to-president-trump-eternal-struggle-between-good-and-evil-playing-out-right-now)

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò warns the president that the current crises over the coronavirus pandemic and the George Floyd riots are a part of the eternal spiritual struggle between the forces of good and evil.
Sat Jun 6, 2020 - 10:26 am EST


https://assets.lifesitenews.com/images/made/images/remote/https_www.lifesitenews.com/images/local/Carlo-Maria-Vigano_3_810_500_75_s_c1.jpg
By Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò


Editor’s note: Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has released this powerful letter today to President Trump warning him that the current crises over the coronavirus pandemic and the George Floyd riots are a part of the eternal spiritual struggle between the forces of good and evil. You are not alone in your beliefs on life, faith, family and freedom.

June 7, 2020

Holy Trinity Sunday

Mr. President,

In recent months we have been witnessing the formation of two opposing sides that I would call Biblical: the children of light and the children of darkness. The children of light constitute the most conspicuous part of humanity, while the children of darkness represent an absolute minority. And yet the former are the object of a sort of discrimination which places them in a situation of moral inferiority with respect to their adversaries, who often hold strategic positions in government, in politics, in the economy and in the media. In an apparently inexplicable way, the good are held hostage by the wicked and by those who help them either out of self-interest or fearfulness.

These two sides, which have a Biblical nature, follow the clear separation between the offspring of the Woman and the offspring of the Serpent. On the one hand there are those who, although they have a thousand defects and weaknesses, are motivated by the desire to do good, to be honest, to raise a family, to engage in work, to give prosperity to their homeland, to help the needy, and, in obedience to the Law of God, to merit the Kingdom of Heaven. On the other hand, there are those who serve themselves, who do not hold any moral principles, who want to demolish the family and the nation, exploit workers to make themselves unduly wealthy, foment internal divisions and wars, and accumulate power and money: for them the fallacious illusion of temporal well-being will one day – if they do not repent – yield to the terrible fate that awaits them, far from God, in eternal damnation.

In society, Mr. President, these two opposing realities co-exist as eternal enemies, just as God and Satan are eternal enemies. And it appears that the children of darkness – whom we may easily identify with the deep state which you wisely oppose and which is fiercely waging war against you in these days – have decided to show their cards, so to speak, by now revealing their plans. They seem to be so certain of already having everything under control that they have laid aside that circumspection that until now had at least partially concealed their true intentions. The investigations already under way will reveal the true responsibility of those who managed the Covid emergency not only in the area of health care but also in politics, the economy, and the media. We will probably find that in this colossal operation of social engineering there are people who have decided the fate of humanity, arrogating to themselves the right to act against the will of citizens and their representatives in the governments of nations.

We will also discover that the riots in these days were provoked by those who, seeing that the virus is inevitably fading and that the social alarm of the pandemic is waning, necessarily have had to provoke civil disturbances, because they would be followed by repression which, although legitimate, could be condemned as an unjustified aggression against the population. The same thing is also happening in Europe, in perfect synchrony. It is quite clear that the use of street protests is instrumental to the purposes of those who would like to see someone elected in the upcoming presidential elections who embodies the goals of the deep state and who expresses those goals faithfully and with conviction. It will not be surprising if, in a few months, we learn once again that hidden behind these acts of vandalism and violence there are those who hope to profit from the dissolution of the social order so as to build a world without freedom: Solve et Coagula, as the Masonic adage teaches.

Although it may seem disconcerting, the opposing alignments I have described are also found in religious circles. There are faithful Shepherds who care for the flock of Christ, but there are also mercenary infidels who seek to scatter the flock and hand the sheep over to be devoured by ravenous wolves. It is not surprising that these mercenaries are allies of the children of darkness and hate the children of light: just as there is a deep state, there is also a deep church that betrays its duties and forswears its proper commitments before God. Thus the Invisible Enemy, whom good rulers fight against in public affairs, is also fought against by good shepherds in the ecclesiastical sphere. It is a spiritual battle, which I spoke about in my recent Appeal which was published on May 8.

For the first time, the United States has in you a President who courageously defends the right to life, who is not ashamed to denounce the persecution of Christians throughout the world, who speaks of Jesus Christ and the right of citizens to freedom of worship. Your participation in the March for Life, and more recently your proclamation of the month of April as National Child Abuse Prevention Month, are actions that confirm which side you wish to fight on. And I dare to believe that both of us are on the same side in this battle, albeit with different weapons.

For this reason, I believe that the attack to which you were subjected after your visit to the National Shrine of Saint John Paul II is part of the orchestrated media narrative which seeks not to fight racism and bring social order, but to aggravate dispositions; not to bring justice, but to legitimize violence and crime; not to serve the truth, but to favor one political faction. And it is disconcerting that there are Bishops – such as those whom I recently denounced – who, by their words, prove that they are aligned on the opposing side. They are subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to the New World Order which they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a universal brotherhood which has nothing Christian about it, but which evokes the Masonic ideals of those want to dominate the world by driving God out of the courts, out of schools, out of families, and perhaps even out of churches.

The American people are mature and have now understood how much the mainstream media does not want to spread the truth but seeks to silence and distort it, spreading the lie that is useful for the purposes of their masters. However, it is important that the good – who are the majority – wake up from their sluggishness and do not accept being deceived by a minority of dishonest people with unavowable purposes. It is necessary that the good, the children of light, come together and make their voices heard. What more effective way is there to do this, Mr. President, than by prayer, asking the Lord to protect you, the United States, and all of humanity from this enormous attack of the Enemy? Before the power of prayer, the deceptions of the children of darkness will collapse, their plots will be revealed, their betrayal will be shown, their frightening power will end in nothing, brought to light and exposed for what it is: an infernal deception.

Mr. President, my prayer is constantly turned to the beloved American nation, where I had the privilege and honor of being sent by Pope Benedict XVI as Apostolic Nuncio. In this dramatic and decisive hour for all of humanity, I am praying for you and also for all those who are at your side in the government of the United States. I trust that the American people are united with me and you in prayer to Almighty God.

United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity, I bless you and the First Lady, the beloved American nation, and all men and women of good will.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò

Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America

Read the letter in PDF form here (https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/Open_Letter_President_Donald_Trump.pdf).


RELATED:


Archbishop Viganò: DC archbishop who criticized Trump’s visit to Catholic shrine is ‘false shepherd’ (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archbishop-vigano-dc-archbishop-who-criticized-trumps-visit-to-catholic-shrine-is-false-shepherd)



Archbishop Viganò: Our Lady warned of ‘great apostasy’ in Church followed by risk of World War III (https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/archbishop-vigano-our-lady-warned-of-great-apostasy-in-church-followed-by-risk-of-world-war-iii)



A9bxqAb8-yk

[greybeard]

Archbishop Vicano
launched this appeal which I do not apologize for repeating here.
Look at what he is saying
https://veritasliberabitvos.info/appeal/

APPEAL FOR THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD
to Catholics and all people of good will
Sign the appeal

Veritas liberabit vos.
Jn 8:32

In this time of great crisis, we Pastors of the Catholic Church, by virtue of our mandate, consider it our sacred duty to make an Appeal to our Brothers in the Episcopate, to the Clergy, to Religious, to the holy People of God and to all men and women of good will. This Appeal has also been undersigned by intellectuals, doctors, lawyers, journalists and professionals who agree with its content, and may be undersigned by those who wish to make it their own.

The facts have shown that, under the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, the inalienable rights of citizens have in many cases been violated and their fundamental freedoms, including the exercise of freedom of worship, expression and movement, have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted. Public health must not, and cannot, become an alibi for infringing on the rights of millions of people around the world, let alone for depriving the civil authority of its duty to act wisely for the common good. This is particularly true as growing doubts emerge from several quarters about the actual contagiousness, danger and resistance of the virus. Many authoritative voices in the world of science and medicine confirm that the media’s alarmism about Covid-19 appears to be absolutely unjustified.

We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.

We also believe that in some situations the containment measures that were adopted, including the closure of shops and businesses, have precipitated a crisis that has brought down entire sectors of the economy. This encourages interference by foreign powers and has serious social and political repercussions. Those with governmental responsibility must stop these forms of social engineering, by taking measures to protect their citizens whom they represent, and in whose interests they have a serious obligation to act. Likewise, let them help the family, the cell of society, by not unreasonably penalizing the weak and elderly, forcing them into a painful separation from their loved ones. The criminalization of personal and social relationships must likewise be judged as an unacceptable part of the plan of those who advocate isolating individuals in order to better manipulate and control them.

We ask the scientific community to be vigilant, so that cures for Covid-19 are offered in honesty for the common good. Every effort must be made to ensure that shady business interests do not influence the choices made by government leaders and international bodies. It is unreasonable to penalize those remedies that have proved to be effective, and are often inexpensive, just because one wishes to give priority to treatments or vaccines that are not as good, but which guarantee pharmaceutical companies far greater profits, and exacerbate public health expenditures. Let us also remember, as Pastors, that for Catholics it is morally unacceptable to develop or use vaccines derived from material from aborted fetuses.

We also ask government leaders to ensure that forms of control over people, whether through tracking systems or any other form of location-finding, are rigorously avoided. The fight against Covid-19, however serious, must not be the pretext for supporting the hidden intentions of supranational bodies that have very strong commercial and political interests in this plan. In particular, citizens must be given the opportunity to refuse these restrictions on personal freedom, without any penalty whatsoever being imposed on those who do not wish to use vaccines, contact tracking or any other similar tool. Let us also consider the blatant contradiction of those who pursue policies of drastic population control and at the same time present themselves as the savior of humanity, without any political or social legitimacy. Finally, the political responsibility of those who represent the people can in no way be left to “experts” who can indeed claim a kind of immunity from prosecution, which is disturbing to say the least.

We strongly urge those in the media to commit themselves to providing accurate information and not penalizing dissent by resorting to forms of censorship, as is happening widely on social media, in the press and on television. Providing accurate information requires that room be given to voices that are not aligned with a single way of thinking. This allows citizens to consciously assess the facts, without being heavily influenced by partisan interventions. A democratic and honest debate is the best antidote to the risk of imposing subtle forms of dictatorship, presumably worse than those our society has seen rise and fall in the recent past.

Finally, as Pastors responsible for the flock of Christ, let us remember that the Church firmly asserts her autonomy to govern, worship, and teach. This autonomy and freedom are an innate right that Our Lord Jesus Christ has given her for the pursuit of her proper ends. For this reason, as Pastors we firmly assert the right to decide autonomously on the celebration of Mass and the Sacraments, just as we claim absolute autonomy in matters falling within our immediate jurisdiction, such as liturgical norms and ways of administering Communion and the Sacraments. The State has no right to interfere, for any reason whatsoever, in the sovereignty of the Church. Ecclesiastical authorities have never refused to collaborate with the State, but such collaboration does not authorize civil authorities to impose any sort of ban or restriction on public worship or the exercise of priestly ministry. The rights of God and of the faithful are the supreme law of the Church, which she neither intends to, nor can, abdicate. We ask that restrictions on the celebration of public ceremonies be removed.

We should like to invite all people of good will not to shirk their duty to cooperate for the common good, each according to his or her own state and possibilities and in a spirit of fraternal charity. The Church desires such cooperation, but this cannot disregard either a respect for natural law or a guarantee of individual freedoms. The civil duties to which citizens are bound imply the State’s recognition of their rights.

We are all called to assess the current situation in a way consistent with the teaching of the Gospel. This means taking a stand: either with Christ or against Christ. Let us not be intimidated or frightened by those who would have us believe that we are a minority: Good is much more widespread and powerful than the world would have us believe. We are fighting against an invisible enemy that seeks to divide citizens, to separate children from their parents, grandchildren from their grandparents, the faithful from their pastors, students from teachers, and customers from vendors. Let us not allow centuries of Christian civilization to be erased under the pretext of a virus, and an odious technological tyranny to be established, in which nameless and faceless people can decide the fate of the world by confining us to a virtual reality. If this is the plan to which the powers of this earth intend to make us yield, know that Jesus Christ, King and Lord of History, has promised that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail” (Mt 16:18).

Let us entrust government leaders and all those who rule over the fate of nations to Almighty God, that He may enlighten and guide them in this time of great crisis. May they remember that, just as the Lord will judge us Pastors for the flock which he has entrusted to us, so will He also judge government leaders for the peoples whom they have the duty to defend and govern.

With faith, let us beseech the Lord to protect the Church and the world. May the Blessed Virgin, Help of Christians, crush the head of the ancient Serpent and defeat the plans of the children of darkness.

[George]

In 1917 Rudolf Steiner Foresaw a Vaccine that Would ‘Drive All Inclination Toward Spirituality Out of People’s Souls’
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2020/05/27/in-1917-rudolf-steiner-foresaw-a-vaccine-that-would-drive-all-inclination-toward-spirituality-out-of-peoples-souls/
Dylan Charles, Editor
Waking Times

If you’ve felt at all like you’re in a spiritual war right now, you’re not alone.

https://i.imgur.com/fuMovbw.jpg

Many of the world’s greatest scholars, philosophers and ascetics understood the world to be multi-dimensional and co-inhabited by non-physical beings both good and evil, always at war with us and each other.

It’s not something that can be rightly explained with language or science. One must cultivate such sensitivity that the existence of spiritual beings can be directly experienced.
Rudolf Steiner was an Austrian philosopher, educator, and spiritualist, and over the course of his life he published numerous books and papers on the science of spirituality. He viewed the human body as a spiritual vessel, open to occupation by other entities.

To be conscious of these forces was to have the power to reject their negative influence. To remain unconscious of them was to be a leaf in their wind, and spiritual cultivation was the key to developing conscious awareness of them.


The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

If people express the natural human inclination toward spiritual growth, they free themselves from fear and anxiety, and effectively develop a sort of immunity to the influences of negative entities. If not, our vibration attracts hostile spirits and we fall unconsciously unto their influence.


There are beings in the spiritual realms for whom anxiety and fear emanating from human beings offer welcome food. When humans have no anxiety and fear, then these creatures starve… If fear and anxiety radiates from people and they break out in panic, then these creatures find welcome nutrition and they become more and more powerful. These beings are hostile towards humanity.

Everything that feeds on negative feelings, on anxiety, fear and superstition, despair or doubt, are in reality hostile forces in supersensible worlds, launching cruel attacks on human beings, while they are being fed. Therefore, it is above all necessary to begin with that the person who enters the spiritual world overcomes fear, feelings of helplessness, despair and anxiety. But these are exactly the feelings that belong to contemporary culture and materialism; because it estranges people from the spiritual world, it is especially suited to evoke hopelessness and fear of the unknown in people, thereby calling up the above mentioned hostile forces against them.” ~Rudolf Steiner

With such profound global fear, anxiety, and panic over the present pandemic, many are exposing their own spiritual sicknesses and acquiescing to any recommended behavior or intervention that might alleviate these emotions. Along with this is the push to vaccinate 7 billion healthy people.

Nearly 100 years ago, in a series of 14 essays published under the title, The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness, Steiner issued a warning to future generations about a possible measure of mass control, quite similar to the visions presented by Orwell and Huxley. Steiner foresaw a future when vaccines could steal our spiritual nature.

First, some background:


“In these fourteen lectures, given at the end of 1917 following four years of war in Europe, Steiner speaks on the complex spiritual forces behind the World War I, humanity’s attempts to build theoretically perfect social orders, and the many divisions and disruptions that would continue on Earth into our own time. Humanity in general was asleep to the fact that fallen spirits, cast from the spiritual worlds, had become intensely active on Earth. This manifested mainly in human thinking and perception of the surrounding world. ” [Source] (https://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA177/English/RSP1993/FalDar_index.html)

The fall into such destructive slumber would be marked by an age of materialism and centralization of power, during which the influences of ‘spirits of darkness’ would inspire humans to devise new technologies and new means of oppression. Steiner comments:


I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination toward spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life – ‘foolish’ here, or course, in the eyes of materialists. . . .

. . . a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination toward spiritual ideas to develop and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses. Out of impulses which the medical profession gained from presumption – oh, I beg your pardon, from the consumption [tuberculosis] they themselves suffered – people are now vaccinated against consumption, and in the same way they will be vaccinated against any inclination toward spirituality. This is merely to give you a particularly striking example of many things which will come in the near and more distant future in this field – the aim being to bring confusion into the impulses which want to stream down to earth after the victory of the [Michaelic] spirits of light [in 1879].” ~Rudolf Steiner

Steiner was talking only about vaccines here. His comment does not consider the compounded effects on human spirituality of the many myriad influences we have in our world today, all of which work against spiritual connection on their own right.

Again, if you’ve felt at all like you’re in a spiritual war, you’re not alone.

Thanks for the link Krzytian. I have now read through the 14 lectures on the Spirits of Darkness and found them incredibly fascinating. Hard to believe that this man foretold a vaccine against spiritual development over 100 years ago.

[greybeard]

Trump Tweets Viganò’s Letter to Him: Analysis by Dr Taylor Marshall
While there is a bit about the church politics --the important thing is that President Trump is obviously listening to and is aware of the concerns of the Archbishop.
Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
Chris


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qdDkllMsoo

[greybeard]

Archbishop Viganò’s letter to President Trump: There is an eternal struggle between good and evil



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9bxqAb8-yk

Disclaimer -- I am not of any religion.
Chris

[Ernie Nemeth]

It was obvious from the start, back years ago now, when the silent invasion began in almost every free nation on earth. The tactic is genius, the future bleak. The agenda is clear.

The citizens were conditioned for years to accept any authority threatening violence in the form of fines, fees, incarceration, shaming, banning, de-funding, innuendo and slander.


No one dares come forward, everyone fears the media turning against them and destroying their lives for telling their truth. From this we learn truth is what we are told and that we do not have the capacity to understand it, only to accept and comply.

David Icke makes a compelling case for the current agenda we see unfolding:


https://davidicke.com/2020/06/11/the-new-normal-is-designed-to-drive-you-crazy-acquiesce-and-it-will/

[Gwin Ru]

Undercover Nurse Exposes Neglect, Mismanagement & Corruption in Treatment of Covid-19 Patients in New York City (https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/11/watch-perspectives-on-the-pandemic-9/)

Off Guardian (https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/11/watch-perspectives-on-the-pandemic-9/)
Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572161/large/maxresdefault.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572161/full/maxresdefault.jpg)


Her story perfectly aligns with that of other doctors and nurses, confirming the over-use of ventilators causing avoidable deaths, forced use of DNRs, financial incentives for Covid diagnoses and a top-down, non-scientific approach spreading fear and making the situation incalculably worse.

Erin Marie Olszewski is a Nurse-turned-investigative journalist, who has spent the last few months on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic, on the inside in two radically different settings. Two hospitals. One private, the other public. One in Florida, the other in New York.

And not just any New York public hospital, but the "epicenter of the epicenter" itself, the infamous Elmhurst in Donald Trump's Queens. As a result of these diametrically opposed experiences, she has the ultimate "perspective on the pandemic". She has been where there have been the most deaths attributed to Covid-19 and where there have been the least.

Erin enlisted in the Army when she was 17. She deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. Part of her duties involved overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities. While in country she received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service, and was wounded in combat. Erin eventually retired as a sergeant, and became a civilian nurse in 2012. Erin is a medical freedom and informed consent advocate. She co-founded the Florida Freedom Alliance but no longer has any connection with the organization.

Her story perfectly aligns with that of other doctors and nurses who have come forward (https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/10/watch-dr-scott-jensen-reveals-ridiculous-covid19-guidance/) or posted to social media (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU_peRaNljE), and confirms some of the worst aspects of the research OffGuardian (and other alt-media outlets) have been doing. Including the over-use of ventilators (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/06/covid19-are-ventilators-killing-people/) in such a way that causes avoidable deaths, the forced use of DNRs (https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/26/were-conditions-for-high-death-rates-at-care-homes-created-on-purpose/), financial incentives for Covid diagnoses (https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/) and in general a top-down, non-scientific approach which spread fear and made the situation incalculably worse.


UIDsKdeFOmQ
The Interviewer:

John Kirby is the director of Four Died Trying, a feature documentary and series on the major assassinations of the 1960s and their calamitous impact on the country. To join the struggle for justice for Dr. King, Malcolm X, and John and Robert Kennedy.

Watch more episodes of Perspectives on the Pandemic here: Episode 1 (https://dai.ly/x7ubcws) Episode 2 (https://dai.ly/k7af1wKOAvcoA7w5DkZ) Episode 3 (https://youtu.be/VK0Wtjh3HVA) Episode 4 (https://youtu.be/cwPqmLoZA4s) Episode 5 (https://dai.ly/k3l3VyZ2YQv6Zbw5VqE) Episode 6 (https://youtu.be/3f0VRtY9oTs) Episode 7 (https://youtu.be/2JbOvjtnPpE) Episode 8 (https://youtu.be/WlLmt6_w_AM)

(As of publication of this video, the producers are still awaiting comment from Elmhurst Hospital). Produced by Libby Handros and John Kirby, The Press and the Public Project.


Related:



Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell.




https://vimeo.com/402537849




According to Dr. Kyle Sidell, COVID-19 is an “Oxygen Deprivation Disease” dissimilar from Pneumonia or ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)




Military nurse at COVID epicenter hospital: “it’s murder” (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/12/military-nurse-at-covid-epicenter-hospital-its-murder/)
Jun12 (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/12/military-nurse-at-covid-epicenter-hospital-its-murder/) by Jon Rappoport (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/author/jonrappoport/)

[Gwin Ru]

Gates Foundation Meets w/ Contact Tracing Participants & H.R. 6666 Drafter Months BEFORE Coronavirus (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/daily-wrap-up/gates-foundation-meets-contact-tracing-participants-h-r-6666-drafter-months-before-coronavirus/)

Posted by Ryan Cristián
12 Jun 2020


https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/TDWU-6-12-600x400.jpg (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/daily-wrap-up/gates-foundation-meets-contact-tracing-participants-h-r-6666-drafter-months-before-coronavirus/)
https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/themes/hades/plugins//wp-postratings/images/stars/rating_on.pnghttps://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/themes/hades/plugins//wp-postratings/images/stars/rating_on.pnghttps://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/themes/hades/plugins//wp-postratings/images/stars/rating_on.pnghttps://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/themes/hades/plugins//wp-postratings/images/stars/rating_on.pnghttps://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/themes/hades/plugins//wp-postratings/images/stars/rating_on.png

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/daily-wrap-up/), a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (6/12/20).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


(https://www.rokfin.com/TLAVagabond (https://www.rokfin.com/TLAVagabond))
(https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/ (https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/))
l-9NgwuWg_Q


Related:





Judy Mikovits PhD TRUTH About Anthony Fauci, 2nd Rd Of Coronavirus & Flu Vaccine Plan To Oust TRUMP (https://twitter.com/DrJudyAMikovits)




The Youtube video having disappeared, here it is available at the Avalon library:





0:35:46

http://avalonlibrary.net/Judy_Mikovits_PhD_w_Christina_Aguayo_Truth_about_A nthony_Fauci-2nd%20Rd%20of_coronavirus_and_%20flu_vaccine_Jun_2 020.mp4


https://twitter.com/DrJudyAMikovits/status/1268241834683203586 (https://twitter.com/DrJudyAMikovits)

At 0:02:45 time stamp:


"... early April 2017 [...] clearly the infection came through this country a year earlier than they said it did..."

[Maia Gabrial]

So, we've been mainly warned by Dr. Fauci that there WILL BE a second wave of the RonaVirus and it'll be worse than the first round. And of course, Lamestream is parroting like the good little puppets they are.

Is it just me or does this sound like they "know" it's coming because they're behind the whole thing, making it happen? Is it because they're not done wreaking more havoc on the world yet?

Tell me if you agree that if they "know" this second wave is coming before it happens and then happens, then it's PREMEDITATED. Right? (A crime)

And if people die from it, then it's PREMEDITATED MURDER. Right? (A bigger crime)

It's a known fact that Globalists like Kill Gates, the Billionaires Club, Warren Buffet, Fauci, etc (too many to name) have planned their Mass Murder Agenda (MMA) and are trying their darndest to fulfill it.

What more proof do we need? They said it in their words and now it's happening....
Are we gonna do something about it? The proof is in all the medical records of ppl who supposedly died of the virus. Each death should be a charge against them.

I'll bet Fauci'll regret paying all those hospitals and doctors to record everything as the CoVid, even when they weren't. :becky: I'll bet when all those numbers are used against him and Kill Gates, they'll cuss up a storm as they being led away in handcuffs....

Talk about outsmarting themselves....

This little post on Kerry Cassidy's blog (unconfirmed yet) about how Italy defied the WHO and autopsied the bodies and made a major discovery (the hidden secret) about the virus. They discovered what it wasn't. For real....

It's worth posting here for fyi:



From: https://projectcamelotportal.com/2020/06/06/remedies-what-to-do-if-you-think-you-have-the-virus-2-2-2-2/

THE FOLLOWING ARE SUGGESTIONS TO A FRIEND AND SHARED HERE FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY…

RECENT INFO RECEIVED TO CONSIDER. not verified!

Breaking Covid news! Italy has allegedly discovered covid is not a virus, but a bacterium. It clots the blood and reduces the oxygen saturation from dispersing throughout the body. They went against the World Health Organization’s that no bodies be autopsied. When Italian Ministry of Health ordered many autopsies, they found the blood was clotted in all of the patients veins. They immediately started using aspirin 100mg and a coagulant medication. And have had immense success. 14,000 people were released from the hospital as healthy and covid free. Italy is demanding Bill Gates and the World health Organization be held accountable for crimes against humanity for misleading, misdirecting, and withholding life saving information from the world, which cost the lives of thousands. Ventilators and ICU units were not necessary. A mandated vaccine is not necessary. Covid19 is a bacterium, easily

treated with aspirin and coagulant. Spread the word! Make this global. Hopefully our president will learn about this and do something about it! Before we lose all of our constitutional freedoms.

Another article regarding it:

Carlie J Gardipee 2020

Coronavirus / Health

Discovery: Autopsies Prove that COVID-19 is a Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (Pulmonary Thrombosis)

[Ioneo]

Whether there is really a second wave or not they will fabricate the data to make it appear that way. They have to drag this fear out longer to seize more control and give time to develop a vaccine.

[Gwin Ru]

From Jim Stone (http://82.221.129.208/.vj7.html):
About the post down the page a ways about Bolsonaro busting the COVID scam wide open -

The claim is that he sent out people to forcibly enter hospitals that were reporting huge coronavirus deaths and huge numbers of patients and ALL WERE EMPTY.

The linked video gets into corruption, and how one hospital that claimed to have 5, 000 coronavirus patients was not even built yet because the governor of the state it was in stole the construction money.

Trolls have hopped onto this saying there's nothing in the MSM and it is B.S., however, brazilians are posting to twitter saying it is in fact legit, that the bust was HUGE and happened all over the country.

I am going with this story as 100 percent legit, Bolsonaro would be just the guy to do this.

Summary: Bolsonaro knew the corona stats were phony. He sent out a large number of government officials to force their way into the hospitals against the wishes of the hospital owners, and they discovered there was no corona, only hospital officials and state officials scamming money from Brazil's government, times EVERY HOSPITAL AUDITED IN EVERY STATE and there were a LOT of them, this is apparently huge news in Brazil and the American MSM won't touch it.

BLOCKBUSTER FROM BRAZIL: BOLSONARO KICKS CORONA @SS

Bolsonaro did not believe hospitals were being honest about Corona, had people break into one that claimed to have 5, 000 CORONA patients and the place was empty.

Five members of the Brazilian parlaiment went to hospitals under the orders of Bolsonaro to conduct surprise audits and confirm the number of patients there.

One hospital claimed to have 5, 000 people with Coronavirus along with 200 dead. When the officials audited it, they discovered it was not even fully constructed yet and had no patients of any sort, let alone Corona.

The same trend happened at other hospitals that were completed. Though they had patients, there were few, if any, with coronavirus while the hospitals were claiming huge numbers.

The hospitals are guilty of embezzlement and defrauding the Brazilian government, while attempting to destroy Brazil with a fraud and forced vaccination scheme.

This same fraud is playing out in American hospitals to an even greater scale now - taken to such an extent that whistle blowing nurses are stating the hospitals are killing people on purpose to get the death stats to actionable levels. Coronavirus is likely the greatest scam perpetrated in the history of mankind.

You will NOT hear about this in America's scam MSM, but for A limited time only (https://twitter.com/AOECOIN/status/1272712575537438720) there's a twitter thread about this, complete with video of the government officials doing the busts. GET WHILE THE GETTING IS GOOD.

[Maia Gabrial]

The only way they can KNOW that a second wave is coming is if they're the ones making it happen. And supposedly it'll be more viral than the first. This should be the red flag that tells you that they're the ones behind this scamdemic.
This CoV19 should already have died down weeks ago...They're just not gonna let it go because their puppet masters want this to keep going.
What evil ppl they are....

[greybeard]

They dont have to make another wave happen and Im not saying they wont have a hand in it when it comes, but virus naturally occur with great regularity.
All they have to do is wait and then hype up through the press (lie) and there is the excuse for another lockdown.
Any claim that "This is the worst" cant be verified.
Fear fear fear will welcome the most stringent measures.
A recent survey in UK found that most do not want the two meter rule abolished--most do not want children to go back to school, most are happy to wear masks in certain situations, most believe that a Vaccine is the solution.
Big sigh!!!!

Chris

[greybeard]

THE HCQ SCANDAL
#Hydroxychloroquine studies conducted by Oxford and the WHO produced an astounding mortality rate 34 times that of other recent studies. As a result the FDA revoked emergency use of the drug in the U.S. Now, data shows potentially lethal doses of HCQ were used on trial participants. Dr. Jim Meehan details this developing scandal.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBI_pobBfck

[Gwin Ru]

Study of All-cause Mortality During Covid-19: No Plague, But Likely Mass Homicide by Government Response (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response)

Dr. Denis G. Rancourt, PhD
researchgate.net (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response)
Tue, 02 Jun 2020 20:23 UTC

Summary / Abstract
The latest data of all-cause mortality by week does not show a winter-burden mortality that is statistically larger than for past winters. There was no plague. However, a sharp "COVID peak" is present in the data, for several jurisdictions in Europe and the USA. This all-cause-mortality "COVID peak" has unique characteristics:

Its sharpness, with a full-width at half-maximum of only approximately 4 weeks;



Its lateness in the infectious-season cycle, surging after week-11 of 2020, which is unprecedented for any large sharp-peak feature;



The synchronicity of the onset of its surge, across continents, and immediately following the WHO declaration of the pandemic;



and its USA state-to-state absence or presence for the same viral ecology on the same territory, being correlated with nursing home events and government actions rather than any known viral strain discernment.

These "COVID peak" characteristics, and a review of the epidemiological history, and of relevant knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, lead me to postulate that the "COVID peak" results from an accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals, and individuals made more immune-vulnerable, by government and institutional actions, rather than being an epidemiological signature of a novel virus, irrespective of the degree to which the virus is novel from the perspective of viral speciation.

The paper is organized into the following sections:

Cause-of-death-attribution data is intrinsically unreliable



Year-to-year winter-burden mortality in mid-latitude nations is robustly regular



Why is the winter-burden pattern of mortality so regular and persistent?



A simple model of viral respiratory disease de facto virulence



All-cause mortality analysis of COVID-19



Interpreting the all-cause mortality "COVID peak"

Cause-of-death-attribution data is intrinsically unreliable
Assignment of cause of death, with infectious diseases and comorbidity, is not only technically difficult (e.g., Simonsen et al., 1997; Marti-Soler et al., 2014) but also contaminated by physician-bias, politics and news media.

This has been known since modern epidemiology was first practiced. Here is Langmuir (1976) quoting the renowned pioneer William Farr, regarding the influenza epidemic of 1847:
Farr uses this epidemic to chide physicians mildly on their narrow views pointing out that sharp increases were observed not only in influenza itself but in bronchitis, pneumonia and asthma and many other non-respiratory causes, he states:
'... there is a strong disposition among some English practitioners not only to localize disease but to see nothing but the local disease. Hence, although it is certain that the high mortality on record was the immediate result of the epidemic of influenza, the deaths referred to that cause are only 1,157.' And, such bias is generally recognized by leading epidemiologists (Lui and Kendal, 1987):
... the decision to classify deaths into "pneumonia and influenza" is subjective and potentially inconsistent. On one hand, the effect of influenza or influenza-related pneumonia may be underestimated because underlying chronic diseases, particularly in the elderly, are usually noted as the cause of death on the death certificate. On the other hand, after influenza activity has been publicly reported there may be an increased tendency to classify deaths as due to "pneumonia and influenza," thereby amplifying the rate of increase in P&I deaths or, when a decline in influenza activity is reported, a bias toward decreasing the classification of deaths related to "pneumonia and influenza" may result. Surveys to evaluate these possibilities have not been done. One can reasonably expect that in the current world of social media, with a World-Health-Organization-declared (WHO-declared) "pandemic", such bias will only be greater compared to its presence in past viral respiratory disease epidemics.

For example, it is difficult to interpret the synchronicity of the WHO declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic and the onset of the observed surge in reported COVID-19 cases and deaths as being the product of either coincidence or extraordinary forecasting ability of the global health-monitoring system:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572110/large/WHO_deaths_Covid_19.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572110/full/WHO_deaths_Covid_19.jpg)
Figure 1: Globally reported COVID-19 cases, and reported COVID-19-assigned deaths, by day. WHO data was accessed on 30 May 2020. The vertical lines in pencil indicate the date at which the WHO declared the pandemic.



https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573128/large/WHO_figures.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573128/full/WHO_figures.png)
Figure 2: Globally reported new COVID-19 cases per day, by continent. WHO data
was accessed on 30 May 2020. The vertical line in pencil indicates the date at which the WHO declared the pandemic.


Instead, in light of past epidemics, it is more likely that this remarkable synchronicity phenomenon arises from biased reporting, in the flexible context of using urgently manufactured laboratory tests that are not validated, clinical assessments of a generic array of symptoms, and tentative cause-of-death assignations of complex comorbidity circumstances.

That is why rigorous epidemiological studies rely instead on all-cause mortality data, which cannot be altered by observational or reporting bias (as discussed in Simonsen et al., 1997; and see Marti-Soler et al., 2014). A death is a death is a death.

Year-to-year winter-burden mortality in mid-latitude nations is robustly regular
Modern human mortality in mid-latitude temperate-climate regions is robustly seasonal. Graphs of number of all-cause deaths per unit of time (month, week, day), in given regions, have a yearly pattern, with a peak-to-trough amplitude of typically 10% to 30% of the trough-baseline value, largely irrespective of the specific pathogens that populate the specific seasons. High mortality occurs in winter, and is thus inverted in the Northern and Southern hemispheres (e.g., Marti-Soler et al., 2014).

For the USA, the phenomenon is well illustrated in this figure from Simonsen et al. (1997):


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573129/large/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573129/full/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png)
Figure 3: All-cause mortality, by week, for the USA, 1972 to 1993 (Simonsen et al., 1997; from their Fig. 1).


In such a graph, the area under a peak, to its trough-level baseline, is the total number of yearly winter-burden deaths above the trough baseline. The thus calculated yearly "excess" number of deaths, here (in the era 1972-1993), is always approximately 8% to 11% of the total yearly trough-baseline-level deaths, also approximately 8% to 11% of the yearly all-cause mortality.

This regular and seasonal "excess" mortality, or winter burden, has been an epidemiological challenge to understand, although, starting with Farr, many epidemiologists originally attributed it almost entirely to the seasonal influenza-like viral respiratory diseases.

Nonetheless, the agonizing difficulty of understanding the cause(s) of this remarkably regular and global (both hemispheres, but inverted) pattern persists, as illustrated by Marti-Soler et al. (2014) (references omitted):
Given that mortality from cancer showed virtually no seasonality pattern, the seasonality of overall mortality is driven mostly by seasonality of both CVD [cardiovascular diseases] and non-CVD/non-cancer mortality. For these conditions, and particularly for CVD, exposure to cold is a plausible explanation for the observed seasonality, given relationship of cold climate with latitude. Several longitudinal studies have demonstrated that a decrease in outdoor temperature was associated with a rise in all-cause mortality. However, other latitude-dependent factors, such as dietary habits, sun exposure (vitamin D levels) and human parasitic and infectious agents might also play a role.

The magnitude of the seasonal pattern for CVD mortality was higher than that for all-cause mortality. The seasonality of CVD mortality might be partly due to the joint seasonality of several known CVD risk factors, as described previously. Similarly, lifestyle factors such as diet and physical activity also tend to differ during summer and winter months. Moreover, exposure to cold increases energy expenditure, peripheral vasoconstriction and cardiac afterload, thus potentially triggering myocardial ischemia 6 and stroke. Finally, winter prone influenza infection might also be a trigger for CVD deaths by exacerbating CVD conditions or due to secondary complications. This is likely to be the case of concentration of air pollutants.

The seasonality of non-CVD/non-cancer mortality can relate to the facts that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia are frequent diseases in this category and that these disease are exacerbated by influenza, other influenza-like infections and concentrations of air pollutants, which are all more frequent in winter. A few other diseases in the non-CVD/non-cancer category also present a seasonal pattern, e.g. depression, suicide, and oesophageal variceal bleeding. Why is the winter-burden pattern of mortality so regular and persistent?
Even the seasonality of the pneumonia and influenza ("P&I") part alone (which is a large part of what Marti-Soler et al. quantify as "non-CVD/non-cancer mortality") was not understood until a decade ago. Until recently, it was debated whether the P&I yearly pattern arose primarily because of seasonal change in virulence of the pathogens, or because of seasonal change in susceptibility of the host (such as from dry air causing tissue irritation, or diminished daylight causing vitamin deficiency or hormonal stress). For example, see Dowell (2001). In a sense, the answer is "neither".

In a landmark study, Shaman et al. (2010) showed that the seasonal pattern of respiratory-disease (P&I) excess mortality can be explained quantitatively on the sole basis of absolute humidity, and its direct controlling impact on transmission of airborne pathogens.

Lowen et al. (2007) demonstrated the phenomenon of humidity-dependent airborne-virus contagiousness in actual disease transmission between guinea pigs, and discussed potential underlying mechanisms for the measured controlling effect of humidity.

The underlying mechanism is that the pathogen-laden aerosol particles or aerosol-size droplets are neutralized within a half-life that monotonically and significantly decreases with increasing ambient absolute humidity. This is based on the seminal work of Harper (1961). Harper experimentally showed that viral-pathogen-carrying droplets were inactivated within shorter and shorter times, as ambient absolute humidity was increased.

Harper argued that the viruses themselves were made inoperative by the humidity ("viable decay"), however he admitted that the effect could be from humidity-enhanced physical removal or gravitational sedimentation of the droplets ("physical loss"):
"Aerosol viabilities reported in this paper are based on the ratio of virus titre to radioactive count in suspension and cloud samples, and can be criticized on the ground that test and tracer materials were not physically identical." The latter ("physical loss") seems more plausible to me, since absolute humidity would have a universal physical effect of causing particle/droplet growth-by-condensation and gravitational sedimentation (and, conversely, loss-by-evaporation and aerosolization), and all tested viral pathogens have essentially the same humidity-driven "decay". Furthermore, it is difficult to understand how a virion (of any virus type) in a droplet would be molecularly or structurally attacked or damaged by an increase in ambient humidity. A "virion" is the complete, infective form of a virus outside a host cell, with a core of RNA or DNA and a capsid. No actual molecular or other mechanism of the humidity-driven intra-droplet "viable decay" of a virion postulated by Harper (1961) has, to date, been explained or studied, whereas gravitational sedimentation ("physical loss") is well understood.

In any case, the explanation and model of Shaman et al. (2010) is not dependent on the particular mechanism of the absolute-humidity-driven decay of virions in aerosol/droplets. Shaman's quantitatively demonstrated model of seasonal regional viral epidemiology is valid for either mechanism (or combination of mechanisms), whether "viable decay" or "physical loss".

The breakthrough achieved by Shaman et al. is not merely some academic point. Rather, it has profound health-policy implications, which have been entirely ignored or overlooked in the current coronavirus pandemic:

It means that the seasonality of P&I mortality is directly driven by absolute-humidity-controlled contagiousness of the viral respiratory diseases.

If my view of the mechanism is correct (i.e., "physical loss" rather than "viable decay"), then:

It additionally implies that the transmission vector must be small aerosol particles in fluid suspension in air, breathed deeply into the lungs, indoors; not hypothesized routes such as actual fluid or fomite contact, and not large droplets and spit (that are quickly gravitationally removed from the air, or captured in the mouth and digestive system).



And it means that social distancing, masks, and handwashing can have little effect in the actual epidemic spread during the winter season (see: Rancourt, 2020).

On the epidemiology modelling side, Shaman's work implies that, rather than being a fixed number (dependent solely on the spatial-temporal structure of social interactions in a completely and variably susceptible population, and on the viral strain), the epidemic's basic reproduction number (R0) is predominantly dependent on ambient absolute humidity. For a definition of R0, see HealthKnowlege-UK (2020): R0 is "the average number of secondary infections produced by a typical case of an infection in a population where everyone is susceptible."

Shaman et al. showed that R0 must be understood to vary seasonally between humid-summer values of just larger than "1" and dry-winter values typically as large as "4" (for example, see their Table 2). In other words, the seasonal infectious viral respiratory diseases that plague temperate-climate regions every year go from being intrinsically mildly contagious to virulently contagious, due simply to the bio-physical mode of transmission controlled by atmospheric absolute humidity, largely irrespective of any other consideration.

Furthermore, indoor airborne virus concentrations have been shown to exist (in day-care facilities, health centres, and onboard airplanes) primarily as aerosol particles of diameters smaller than 2.5 μm, such as in the work of Yang et al. (2011):
"Half of the 16 samples were positive, and their total virus concentrations ranged from 5,800 to 37,000 genome copies m−3. On average, 64 percent of the viral genome copies were associated with fine particles smaller than 2.5 µm, which can remain suspended for hours. Modelling of virus concentrations indoors suggested a source strength of 1.6 ± 1.2 × 105 genome copies m−3 air h−1 and a deposition flux onto surfaces of 13 ± 7 genome copies m−2 h−1 by Brownian motion. Over 1 hour, the inhalation dose was estimated to be 30 ± 18 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), adequate to induce infection. These results provide quantitative support for the idea that the aerosol route could be an important mode of influenza transmission." Such small particles (smaller than 2.5 μm) are part of air fluidity, are not subject to gravitational sedimentation, and can therefore be breathed deeply into the lungs.

The next question is: How many such pathogen-laden particles are needed to cause infection in a person of average immune-response capacity?

Yezli and Otter (2011), in their review of the minimal infective dose (MID), point out relevant features:

most respiratory viruses are as infective in humans as in tissue culture having optimal laboratory susceptibility



the 50%-probability MID ("TCID50") has variably been found to be in the range 100−1000 virions



there are typically 103−107 virions per aerolized influenza droplet with diameter 1 μm − 10 μm



the 50%-probability MID easily fits into a single (one) aerolized droplet

For further background:

A classic description of dose-response assessment is provided by Haas (1993).



Zwart et al. (2009) provided the first laboratory proof, in a virus-insect system, that the action of a single virion can be sufficient to cause disease.



Baccam et al. (2006) calculated from empirical data that, with influenza A in humans, "we estimate that after a delay of ~6 h, infected cells begin producing influenza virus 9 and continue to do so for ~5 h. The average lifetime of infected cells is ~11 h, and the half-life of free infectious virus is ~3 h. We calculated the basic reproductive number, R0, which indicated that a single infected cell could produce ~22 new productive infections."



Brooke et al. (2013) showed that, contrary to prior modeling assumptions, although not all influenza-A-infected cells in the human body produce infectious progeny (virions), nonetheless, 90% of infected cell are significantly impacted, rather than simply surviving unharmed.

The above review means that all the viral respiratory diseases that seasonally plague temporal-climate populations every year are extremely contagious for two reasons:
(1) they are transmitted by small aerosol particles that are part of the fluid air and fill virtually all enclosed air spaces occupied by humans, and

(2) a single such aerosol particle carries the minimal infective dose (MID) sufficient to cause infection in a person, if breathed into the lungs, where the infection is initiated.
This is why the pattern of all-cause mortality is so robustly stable and distributed globally, if we admit that the majority of the burden is induced by viral respiratory diseases, while being relatively insensitive to the particular seasonal viral ecology for this operational class of viruses. This also explains why the pattern is inverted between the Northern and Southern hemispheres, irrespective of tourist and business air travel and so one.

Virologists and geneticists see viral strains, mutations, and species (Alimpiev, 2019) like a man with a hammer sees nails. Likewise, there are professional rewards for identifying new viral pathogens and describing new diseases. For these reasons, scientists have not seen the forest for the trees.

But the data shows that there is a persistent and regular pattern of winter-burden mortality that is independent of the details, and that has a well-constrained distribution of year to year number of excess deaths (approximately 8% to 11% of the total yearly mortality, in the USA, 1972 through 1993). Despite all the talk of epidemics and pandemics and novel viruses, the pattern is robustly constant.

An anomaly worthy of panic, and of harmful global socio-economic engineering, would need to consist of a naturally caused yearly winter-burden mortality that is statistically greater than the norm. That has not occurred since the unique flu pandemic of 1918 (Hsieh et al., 2006).

The three recent epidemics assigned as pandemics, the H2N2 pandemic of 1957, the H3N2 pandemic of 1968, and the H1N1 pandemic of 2009, were not more virulent (in terms of yearly winter-burden mortality) than the regular seasonal epidemics (Viboud et al., 2010; Viboud et al., 2006; Viboud et al., 2005). In fact, the epidemic of 1951 was concluded to be more deadly, on the basis of P&I data, in England, Wales and Canada, than the pandemics of 1957 and 1968 (Viboud et al., 2006).

A simple model of viral respiratory disease de facto virulence
In the face of the persistent and regular pattern of winter-burden mortality, one is tempted to propose that the specific (structural, molecular, and binding) properties of the particular respiratory disease viral pathogen are not as determinative of mortality as virologists suggest. Instead, it is possible that mortality, in a given population exposed to these highly contagious viral pathogens that invade the lungs, is predominantly controlled by the population's distribution of immune-system capacity and preparedness.

A viral load enters the lungs. Once the viral antigen is recognized, an immune response is mounted.1 A dynamic "war" ensues between the virus reproducing and spreading by infecting cells on the lining of the lungs, and the immune system doing everything it can to identify, locate and destroy infected cells before the said infected cells successfully can be productive of the virus.

The immune response is extraordinarily demanding of the body's metabolic energy resources (which is why you "feed a cold", "rest", and "stay warm"). The demand in metabolic energy is prioritized, and can compete with the demands of essential bodily functions and immune responses to other pathogens. This is why individuals with "aging" diseases and comorbidity conditions are particularly at risk: their rate of metabolic energy supply to the immune-system is limited by their co-conditions, and the demand is not met at a sufficiently high rate to win the "war". See: Straub (2017); Bajgar et al. (2015).

In a simple view of the infection (which I propose for illustration), a given individual, having a given state of health, can only provide metabolic energy to the immune system up to some maximum rate of supply, during the crucial stage of the "war". Call this "rate of energy supply for the immune response": RS. RS is in units of energy per unit time, J/s, or calories per second. If RS is sufficient to "win the war", and is sustained long enough, then the individual recovers from the infection, and the immune system stores a molecular memory of the viral antigen, which greatly reduces energy demand for future immune responses to attacks from the same or sufficiently similar virus. If RS is insufficient then the individual succumbs to the virus and dies.

Therefore, the seasonal virus can be characterized as having a virus-specific value of RS, RSv, which is the RS threshold for survival of the infected person. If RS > RSv, then the person recovers. If RS < RSv, then the person dies. The larger the RSv, the more virulent is the virus, and vice versa.

A given human population (national or regional) will have a given distribution of RS values associated with the individual members of the population.

Mathematically, this distribution can be represented as a probability density of RS values. A probability-density value has units of number of persons per unit interval of RS. The total area under the probability density curve is the population, of the nation or region.

Figure 4 illustrates three hypothetical distributions of RS values, in three different populations of equal size. Here, "Germany" (solid-blue line) is for a current Western population, not having a particularly large elderly population; "Italy" (dashed-blue line) is for a current Western population having a large elderly population; and "Stressed" (solid-red line) is for a population of individuals subjected to high metabolic (or health) stress, such as might have been the case in 1918 England.

Such health stress can arise from nutritional deficiency, essential nutrient or vitamin efficiency, high levels of environmental stressor-agents, toxins, or pathogens, shelter deficiency ("fuel poverty"), oppressive working conditions, social-dominance oppression, substance abuse causing organ damage, and so on. There is a vast literature on these factors. As one anchor point, see: Sapolsky (2015); Sapolsky (2005).


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573135/large/Probability_densities_of_RS_va.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573135/full/Probability_densities_of_RS_va.png)
Figure 4: Probability densities of RS values, for three populations of equal size but differing in health-stress levels and health vulnerabilities, as explained in the text. The three vertical lines, drawn in pencil and labelled "1", "2" and "3", show three different virus-specific values of RSv, as explained in the text. The hatched areas are the fractions (of total area) representing the mortality fractions for the less virulent virus having RSv value labelled "1". © D. G. Rancourt


In this model, therefore, comparative mortality between populations, for a given viral pathogen, is determined by the different health states (distributions of RS values of the individuals) of the compared infected populations.

This is for the full cycle of infection and recovery. It says little about both the death rates on a daily basis and age distributions, which depend on the natural or forced spread of the infection, which in turn is not necessarily uniform in time and space but rather can target particular segments of the population, such as people confined in institutions.

Furthermore, the distribution of RS values for a given population can change significantly during the course of an epidemic, if vulnerable segments are subjected to additional health stressors, for example.

All-cause mortality analysis of COVID-19
In light of the above background and conceptual tools, we can now examine data for COVID-19, to date. For good reason (as per above), we ignore death-attributed data and model deconvolutions of P&I deaths versus other deaths deemed to be seasonal for reasons unrelated to the seasonal viral pathogens. We concentrate on all-cause mortality, by week.

All-cause mortality is not susceptible to bias, and is currently available for several jurisdictions. We use the raw data without any manipulation, and we do not modify the data to "correct" for changes in total population, or for changes in age structure of a population.

For the data, we rely on the CDC (USA), national institute data for England and Wales, and the graphical compilations of the EuroMOMO hub. We use only the latest weeks that are reported as complete (">100%", CDC) or reported to be of sufficient quality to publish. Unfortunately, some jurisdictions such as Canada can be characterized as slow and refractory to requests.

Figure 5 shows all-cause mortality by week for England and Wales, starting in 2010. The sudden single-week drops are book-keeping and death-certification-delay inconsistencies, which are counted in the following week(s). The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the pandemic.

In declaring the pandemic, the WHO Director-General, Tedros Adhanom, put it this way, among other things:2
In the days and weeks ahead, we expect to see the number of cases, the number of deaths, and the number of affected countries climb even higher. [...]

And we have called every day for countries to take urgent and aggressive action. We have rung the alarm bell loud and clear. [...]

This is not just a public health crisis, it is a crisis that will touch every sector - so every sector and every individual must be involved in the fight.

I have said from the beginning that countries must take a whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach, built around a comprehensive strategy to prevent infections, save lives and minimize impact. [...]

I remind all countries that we are calling on you to activate and scale up your emergency response mechanisms; Communicate with your people about the risks and how they can protect themselves - this is everybody's business; Find, isolate, test and treat every case and trace every contact; [I]Ready your hospitals; [...] (my emphasis) Adhanom's words either were the most remarkable public health forecast ever made for England and Wales (and many jurisdictions in the world, see below), or something else might explain the sharp peak in all-cause mortality that immediately followed his declaration.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573136/large/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573136/full/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png)
Figure 5: All-cause mortality by week for England and Wales, starting in 2010. The sudden single-week drops are book-keeping and death-certification-delay inconsistencies, which are counted in the following week(s). The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. © D. G. Rancourt


Importantly, the total number of winter-burden all-cause "excess" deaths for the season ending in 2020 (area above the summer baseline) is not statistically larger than for past years, and it remains to be seen how low the summer 2020 trough will be.

What can be called "the COVID peak" is a narrow feature (Figure 5). Relative to the summer baseline, the full-width at half-maximum of the peak is approximately 5 weeks. It has the distinction of being late in the infectious season, and of climbing far above the broader winter-burden hump.

This "COVID peak" is a unique event in the epidemiological history of England and Wales. Does this unique feature arise from an unusually novel viral pathogen, or does it arise from the unique, unprecedented and massive government response to the WHO declaration of a pandemic?

Note that such a "COVID peak" does not imply intrinsic virulence of the virus. It only means that the deaths of vulnerable persons, or persons made vulnerable, occurred in a short time span. For example, those who would have died in the next few or more weeks or months can have their deaths accelerated by human intervention, or those who are still recovering from a viral infection can be thrust into more precarious and stressful living conditions.

An analogous "COVID peak" occurred in the EuroMOMO hub data for Europe (Figure 6). Here again, the total number of winter-burden all-cause excess deaths for the season ending in 2020 (area above the summer baseline) is not statistically larger than for past years, and the date of declaration of the pandemic is shown by a vertical red line.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573137/large/All_cause_mortality_by_week_Eu.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573137/full/All_cause_mortality_by_week_Eu.png)
Figure 6: All-cause mortality by week EuroMOMO hub data for Europe, accessed on 1 June 2020. The date of declaration of the pandemic is shown by a vertical red line. © D. G. Rancourt


What looked like a concluding and "mild" 2020 season turned into a "COVID peak" immediately after the WHO declared the pandemic.

Let us next move to the USA, where both national and state-by-state current data is readily available, thanks to the CDC.

Figure 7 shows all-cause mortality by week for the USA, starting in 2014. Here the summer baseline is at approximately 46,000 to 52,000 deaths per week, increasing with the increase in total population. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573138/large/Rancourt_USA_deaths_covid_19.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573138/full/Rancourt_USA_deaths_covid_19.jpg)

Figure 7: All-cause mortality by week for the USA, starting in 2014. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The hatched or gray-fill areas represent the all-cause winter-burden deaths for each year.© D.G. Rancourt


Here, again, we see that the total number of winter-burden all-cause deaths for the season ending in 2020 (area above the summer baseline) is not statistically larger than for past recent years. There is no evidence, purely in terms of number of seasonal deaths, to suggest any catastrophic event or exceptionally virulent pathogen. There was no "plague". The winter burden, in these years, is consistently in the range of approximately 6% to 9% of total yearly all-cause mortality, and the year to year variations are typical of historic variations.

On the other hand, there is again a "COVID peak", which has the following unique features:

It is remarkably sharp or narrow, having a full-width at half-maximum of the peak, relative to the summer baseline, of approximately only 4 weeks. By comparison, the sharp peaks in the infectious seasons ending in 2015 and 2018 have such full-widths of 14 and 9 weeks, respectively.



It occurs later in the infectious season than any other large sharp peak ever seen for the USA, surging after week-11 of 2020.



It surge occurs immediately after the WHO declared the pandemic, in perfect synchronicity, as seen in both Europe, and England and Wales, which are an ocean apart from the USA.

The "COVID peak" in the USA data arises from "hot spots", such as New York City (NYC). Figure 8 shows the all-cause mortality by week for NYC, starting in 2013. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573139/large/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573139/full/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png)
Figure 8: All-cause mortality by week for NYC, starting in 2013, in black. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The grey line is simply the same data on a vertically expanded and shifted scale, for visualization.© D.G. Rancourt


The NYC data makes no epidemiological sense whatsoever. The "COVID peak" here, on its face, cannot be interpreted as a normal viral respiratory disease process in a susceptible population. Local effects, such as importing patients from other jurisdictions or high densities of institutionalized or housed vulnerable people, must be in play, at least.

What is also striking is that some of the largest-population states in the USA, having large numbers of measured and reported cases, and large numbers of individuals with the antibodies, do not show a "COVID peak". (Characteristic antibodies are produced and stored in the bodies of individuals who were infected and recovered following their immune responses. For example, see the antibody field study for California done by Bendavid et al., 2020).

This is shown for California in Figure 9, and for Texas in Figure 10.


Figure 9: (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573140/full/All_cause_mortality_by_week_fo.png) All-cause mortality by week for California, starting in 2013. The red vertical lineindicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The hatched or gray-fill areas represent the all-cause winter-burden deaths for each year.© D.G. Rancourt



https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573141/large/Texas_deaths_Covid_19_Rancourt.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573141/full/Texas_deaths_Covid_19_Rancourt.jpg)
Figure 10: All-cause mortality by week for Texas, starting in 2013. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The hatched or gray-fill areas represent the all-cause winter-burden deaths for each year. © D.G. Rancourt -


Also, none of the seven states that did not impose a lockdown (Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming, and Arkansas) have a "COVID peak".

The presence of a "COVID peak" is positively correlated with the share of COVID-19-assigned deaths occurring in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, as per this map: (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573142/full/Map_USA_Covid_19_Care_home_dea.jpg)


Interpreting the all-cause mortality "COVID peak"
Given the uniqueness of the all-cause mortality "COVID peak":

Its sharpness, with a full-width at half-maximum of only approximately 4 weeks;



Its lateness in the infectious-season cycle, surging after week-11 of 2020, which is unprecedented for any large sharp-peak feature;



The synchronicity of the onset of its surge, across continents, and immediately following the WHO declaration of the pandemic;



and its USA state-to-state absence or presence for the same viral ecology on the same territory being correlated with nursing home events and government actions rather than any known viral strain discernment.

Given the above review of knowledge about seasonal viral respiratory diseases:

The robustly persistent and regular winter-burden patterns of all-cause mortality, across the modern era of epidemiology, and across nations in two hemispheres;



The newfound (2010) understanding that transmissivity is controlled by absolute humidity, and that the transmission vector is small aerosol particles taken deeply into the lungs;



The increasing recognition of metabolic energy budgeting as the paradigm for understanding death from infectious diseases with comorbidity conditions, while recognizing that the immune system has hierarchical control over metabolic energy budgeting, second only to cognition of external imminent danger;



and the increasing understanding of the dominant role of metabolic stress (including stress cognition, perceived stress) in depressing immune system response capacity.

I postulate that the "COVID peak" represents an accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals, and individuals made more immune-vulnerable, by government and institutional actions, rather than being an epidemiological signature of a novel virus, irrespective of the degree to which the virus is novel from the perspective of viral speciation.

Finally, my interpretation of the "COVID peak" as being a signature of mass homicide by government response is supported by several institutional documents, media reports, and scientific articles, such as the following examples. Two scientific articles are on-point:

Hawryluck et al. (2004), on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) arising from medical quarantine.



Richardson et al. (2020), on statistical proof that mechanical ventilators killed critical COVID-19 patients.

*******

Media articles and institutional memos (https://www.sott.net/article/436710-Study-of-All-cause-Mortality-During-Covid-19-No-Plague-But-Likely-Mass-Homicide-by-Government-Response)

"New study finds nearly all coronavirus patients put on ventilators died", News Break (https://www.newsbreak.com/news/0Oq9qI1z/new-study-finds-nearly-all-coronavirus-patients-put-on-ventilators-died) | The Hill 04-23, 23 April 2020.
"New health care data suggests that almost half of all coronavirus patients placed on ventilators die, first reported by CNN. The data was gathered at Northwell Health, New York state's largest hospital system. It revealed that about 20 percent of COVID-19 patients passed away, and 88 percent of those placed on ventilators died." "Daughter blames 'chaos' of COVID-19 pandemic for mother's rapid decline", by Arthur White-Crummey, Regina Leader-Post (https://thestarphoenix.com/news/saskatchewan/daughter-blames-chaos-of-covid-19-pandemic-for-mothers-rapid-decline/), 29 May 2020.
"Sue Nimegeers's mother never had COVID-19, but she still counts her as a victim of the disease. "She never tested positive, but the chaos of the pandemic itself around us, we feel, took her from us just way too soon," Nimegeers told the board of the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) on Friday." "'Deeply disturbing' report into Ontario care homes released", BBC (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52814435), 27 May 2020.
"Mr Ford said a full investigation has been launched into the allegations, which included claims that facilities smelt of rotten food, infested with cockroaches and flies, and that elderly people were left for hours "crying for help with staff not responding"." "Nothing can justify this destruction of people's lives", Yoram Lass, former director of Israel's Health Ministry, on the hysteria around Covid-19, sp!ked (https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/05/22/nothing-can-justify-this-destruction-of-peoples-lives/), 22 May 2020.
"Yoram Lass: It is the first epidemic in history which is accompanied by another epidemic - the virus of the social networks. These new media have brainwashed entire populations. What you get is fear and anxiety, and an inability to look at real data. And therefore you have all the ingredients for monstrous hysteria. It is what is known in science as positive feedback or a snowball effect. The government is afraid of its constituents. Therefore, it implements draconian measures. The constituents look at the draconian measures and become even more hysterical." "Cuomo downplays calls for federal probe into nursing home coronavirus deaths: 'Ask President Trump' ", by Andrew O'Reilly | Fox News (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-probe-into-nursing-home-coronavirus-deaths-ask-president-trump), 20 May 2020.
"New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday brushed off calls for the Department of Justice to open an investigation into the massive number of deaths in the state's nursing homes during the coronavirus pandemic - claiming he was only following guidelines from the Trump administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While no formal probe has been announced, the speculation comes amid scrutiny of his March 25 directive that required nursing homes to take on new patients infected with COVID-19." DATE: March 25, 2020
TO: Nursing Home Administrators, Directors of Nursing, and Hospital Discharge Planners
FROM: New York State Department of Health Advisory: Hospital Discharges and Admissions to Nursing Homes (Removed from: coronavirus.health.ny.gov (https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2020/03/doh_covid19-_nhadmissionsreadmissions_-032520.pdf))
"During this global health emergency, all NHs must comply with the expedited receipt of residents returning from hospitals to NHs. Residents are deemed appropriate for return to a NH upon a determination by the hospital physician or designee that the resident is medically stable for return. [...] No resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the NH solely based on a confmned or suspected diagnosis ofCOVID-19. NHs are prohibited from requiring a hospitalized resident who is determined medically stable to be tested for COVID-19 prior to admission or readmission." "Nursing Homes & Assisted Living Facilities Account for 42% of COVID-19 Deaths: A startling statistic has profound implications for the way we've managed the coronavirus pandemic", by Gregg Girvan, FREOPP (https://freopp.org/the-covid-19-nursing-home-crisis-by-the-numbers-3a47433c3f70), 7 May 2020.
"Based on a new analysis of state-by-state COVID-19 fatality reports, it is clear that the most underappreciated aspect of the novel coronavirus pandemic is its effect on a specific population of Americans: those living in nursing homes and assisted living facilities." "Guilty - Of Breathing", by Tony Heller, Tony Heller YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sjNQ4YTUM4), 24 May 2020.
"Lockdowns were sold months ago on the idea of 'flattening the curve'. In most places there never was much of a curve to flatten, yet the lockdowns are still in place. Tens of millions are now having their lives destroyed - for the crime of breathing." "The 'massacre' of Italy's elderly nursing home residents: Covid-19 patients in Italy's virus epicentre of Lombardy were transferred to nursing homes by an official resolution with catastrophic consequences", by Maria Tavernini and Alessandro Di Rienzo, TRT World (https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/the-massacre-of-italy-s-elderly-nursing-home-residents-35575), 20 April 2020.
"Hosting Covid-19 patients in nursing homes was like lighting a match in a haystack." "Coronavirus Update: How shoring up hospitals for COVID-19 contributed to Canada's long-term care crisis", by Jessie Willms and Hailey Montgomery, Globe & Mail (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-coronavirus-update-how-shoring-up-hospitals-for-covid-19-contributed/), 20 May 2020.
"Most of the nursing- and retirement-home residents who have succumbed to COVID-19 in Canada died inside the virus-stricken, understaffed facilities as hospital beds sat empty." "There Is No Evidence Lockdowns Saved Lives. It Is Indisputable They Caused Great Harm", by Briggs, wmbriggs.com (https://wmbriggs.com/post/30833/), 14 May 2020.
"In the end, it does not come down to country- or even city-level statistics. It comes down to people. Each individual catches the bug or not, lives or dies. Not because of their country, but because of themselves, their health, their circumstances. Any given individual might have benefited from self-quarantine and loss of job. Just as any given individual might have come to a bad end from a lockdown." "Hospitals get paid more to list patients as COVID-19", by Tom Kertscher, POLITIFACT (https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/21/facebook-posts/Fact-check-Hospitals-COVID-19-payments/), 21 April 2020.
"It's standard for Medicare to pay a hospital roughly three times as much for a patient who goes on a ventilator, as for one who doesn't. Medicare is paying a 20% add-on to its regular hospital payments for the treatment of COVID-19 victims. That's a result of a federal stimulus law." "CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in U.S., highest death toll in 40 years", by Associated Press, STAT News (https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/), 26 September 2018.
"An estimated 80,000 Americans died of flu and its complications last winter — the disease's highest death toll in at least four decades. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Redfield, revealed the total in an interview Tuesday night with The Associated Press." Footnotes

'The immune system: Cells, tissues, function, and disease', medically reviewed by Daniel Murrell, MD on January 11, 2018 — Written by Tim Newman, at medicalnewstoday.com (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320101), accessed on 1 June, 2020.
WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 (https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020)

Scientific references (https://www.sott.net/article/436710-Study-of-All-cause-Mortality-During-Covid-19-No-Plague-But-Likely-Mass-Homicide-by-Government-Response) [see full article: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response ]

[Gwin Ru]

Coronavirus: How and why thousands of old people have been murdered (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=yl-kJ_PcwGk&feature=emb_logo)

Dr Vernon Coleman — YouTube June 1, 2020


yl-kJ_PcwGk

[Luke Holiday]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR2Ju_E1kuQ


Here is an excellent video, by Dr Timothy Shea, who is offering a $5,000 reward to anyone who can prove a Covid 19 Diagnosis. (Remember the testing has been proven to be unreliable and invalid).

Dr Shea presents his Hypothesis that Covid 19 is nothing more than a re- packaged seasonal flu and he adroitly goes about the 56 minute video scientifically proving that hypothesis (something GB and others have repeatedly done on this forum).



Vid Timeline

2:15 Historical precedence (Boutique epidemics) - here very interesting commonalities surrounding all the past fake pandemics in recent history are covered

5:30: Hx of Covid 19 begins : Key statement the recovered cases were/are never tracked or counted so you have this intentionally misleading running total.
For the first 2 months no verifiable proof of a new disease – people were being dx’ed simply on seasonal flu symptoms.

8:43 CV 19 testing:


Symptom Diagnosis Alone: using seasonal flu sx’s being to diagnosis

(9:23) AB test: 15 years medical science stated that having a positive AB test was a sign of recovery. Now the script has been flipped, and the test is being used to identify patients as being infected with a lethal contagious pathogen in need of heroic tx.

Any unidentifiable compound viral or otherwise found in the blood was/is labeled as CV 1

(14:20)PCR test:Test creator, Dr. Mullis, disavowed test upon introduction. “These tests cannot detect free, infectious pathogens at all, they only detect proteins that are believed to be associated, sometimes wrongly, to the virus. The test can detect believed particles of virus – but not the virus itself.”

(11:15)Test kits:: On CDC own website: “For experimental use only not for diagnostic purposes” and CDC statement of not backing up validity of test. After all the hospitals/Dr’s offices received these kits there a huge spike in the number of cases.

(1300) On-site test kits: allows for 5-10 minute screen for CV 19 – this is scientifically ludacris as it is unproven and untested in the ability to isolate any pathogen.

Bottom line all testing methods are scientifically proven to be invalid and unreliable, yet they continue to be used to run up the numbers that are seen on daily CV 19 scoreboards.


OK this is where I stopped typing... more to follow when I have more time…

Anyone care to take a shot at that $5000:)?

Are you as fed up with this nonsense as I am?

When do we stop the insanity and stop acquiescing in mass?

.

Blessings Luke

[Gwin Ru]

Some data-driven questions about 'excess deaths' for the lockdown apologists (https://medium.com/@JohnPospichal/questions-for-lockdown-apologists-32a9bbf2e247)

John Pospichal
Medium (https://medium.com/@JohnPospichal/questions-for-lockdown-apologists-32a9bbf2e247)
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:40 UTC

We now have mortality data for the first few months of 2020 for many countries, and, as you might expect, there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in each one.

Surprisingly, however, these increases did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after. Moreover, in almost every case, they began immediately after. Often, mortality numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after lockdowns were decreed.

This is an astonishing finding. But before I discuss its full import, and pose some questions to those who still defend the utility of lockdowns, I want to present the data that proves it.

Here's a series of charts by the Financial Times showing overall mortality and "deaths in excess of normal levels" in 2020 for a number of countries:

Source (https://www.ft.com/content/6bd88b7d-3386-4543-b2e9-0d5c6fac846c).

Note: I removed the chart in the bottom right corner which represented "13 countries/cities combined" and replaced it with the FT chart for New York City.

As you can see, in every country there were significant increases in overall mortality beginning some time in February or March.

Now let's add the lockdown dates in green for each country:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573366/large/1_aEH5EsExizOJj8JRyePmtg.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573366/full/1_aEH5EsExizOJj8JRyePmtg.jpg)
© Financial Times/John Burn-Murdoch


You will notice that only after each country (or city) was locked down did the increases begin. Moreover, they began immediately, and in nearly every case, precipitously.

Now let's examine the data for a few of these countries and cities in greater detail.

Belgium
The Economist has published its own series of charts (https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/04/16/tracking-covid-19-excess-deaths-across-countries#eid-france) showing excess deaths in several countries. Here's its chart for Belgium:

Note: The Economist’s charts are interactive in the source.

The national lockdown is shown to have occurred on March 18th. But that was only Phase 2 (https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/belgium-enters-lockdown-over-coronavirus-crisis-until-5-april/) of the national lockdown. Phase 1, which included widespread business closures, began on March 13th (https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/belgium-activates-emergency-measures-to-contain-coronavirus-outbreak/).

Their chart, therefore, should really look like this:

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573368/large/1_0o11qPCnAYEI1PHrgvWNeg.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573368/full/1_0o11qPCnAYEI1PHrgvWNeg.png)
© The Economist


Which shows no increase in mortality before the lockdown, and then an immediate and precipitous increase after it was imposed.

The Netherlands
In a strange oversight, the lockdown that was declared on March 15 (https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2020/03/the-netherlands-on-lockdown-schools-cafes-and-sports-clubs-shut/) in that country is not indicated here. Moreover, the March 23rd (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-netherlands-gathering/dutch-govt-bans-public-gatherings-until-june-1-due-to-coronavirus-idUSA5N2BB007) "ban on public gatherings" shown in the chart was simply the bolstering of an already-existing ban on public gatherings that had been issued on March 12 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-events/dutch-close-museums-ban-public-gatherings-amid-virus-outbreak-idUSKBN20Z2DB) (which was accompanied (https://www.omroepwest.nl/nieuws/4011507/Bezoek-verpleeghuizen-omlaag-eenzame-ouderen-even-buddy-loos) by the lockdown (https://www.pzc.nl/zeeuws-nieuws/bezoek-voor-bewoners-verpleeghuizen-wvo-zorg-even-niet-meer-welkom~a9a7aea3/?referrer=https://www.google.com/) of nursing homes (https://www.noordhollandsdagblad.nl/cnt/dmf20200313_50856319/spaarne-gasthuis-en-verpleeghuizen-in-haarlem-beperken-bezoek)). The Dutch lockdown, therefore, began on March 12, escalated on March 15, and peaked on March 23.

Let's add that information to the chart:

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573370/large/1_3Ei6wL_zwX_uNMZKFFRQOw.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573370/full/1_3Ei6wL_zwX_uNMZKFFRQOw.png)
© The Economist


Once again, we see no significant increase in mortality before the start of the lockdown, and then an immediate, precipitous increase once the lockdown began.

(Note: The slightest increase in mortality is still observable immediately before the "Lockdown phase 1" line, but that is probably due to the fact that the Netherlands reports its mortality data on a weekly, rather than a daily basis, and March 12th ("Lockdown phase 1") fell in the middle of the week. If we had daily data, we would probably be able to confirm that there was no increase at all prior to March 12th.)

Spain
Let's move on to some larger countries.

Here's The Economist's chart for Spain (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573376/large/1_YyVurWETWKfo22G24uyOXA.jpg):



Note that most of the excess deaths came from the Madrid region.

Here's a chart I made of overall mortality in the Madrid region using the same data The Economist used (available here (https://github.com/TheEconomist/covid-19-excess-deaths-tracker)). Notice the steep rise in deaths beginning around March 9th:

Now let's add the major lockdown orders to this chart:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573378/large/1_oFc3qNgnQzYWOmdss4Hl8Q.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573378/full/1_oFc3qNgnQzYWOmdss4Hl8Q.jpg)
© John Pospichal/The Economist


Red text denotes lockdown orders limited to the Madrid region; purple text denotes lockdown orders affecting the entire nation. I compiled this information from news reports.

You will observe here the same peculiar phenomenon we've observed thus far: significant rises in mortality do not pre-date major lockdown events, but rather coincide with them, or follow them very closely.

Next up, Britain.

Britain
The Economist draws the "National lockdown" line on Mar 23. But again, that was only Phase 2 (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/world/europe/coronavirus-uk-boris-johnson.html) of the lockdown. Phase 1 (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/20/coronavirus-uk-pm-announces-lockdown-measures-in-london.html) began on March 20.

Many of the excess deaths occurred in London (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573390/large/1_x1l5gAfTCSFRJVWdSiN_6Q.png). Let's take a closer look at that data:

As you can see from this chart (created using The Economist's own data set), there was no significant increase in deaths before March 20, and no increase at all before March 13.

Now let's add the lockdown dates:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573392/large/1_WkdXnXiHEos4N8X3c2s_CQ.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573392/full/1_WkdXnXiHEos4N8X3c2s_CQ.png)
© John Pospichal/The Economist


And we see the same phenomenon here as elsewhere — namely, no increase in overall mortality until after the lockdowns begin, and then a sudden, precipitous rise.

Italy
In Italy, the largest increase in deaths occurred in the Lombardy region. Let's look closer at that data (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573395/large/1_EgUwE0Fc_RXHogt5dl0rGA.png), and also plot the regional lockdown on February 22 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/23/coronavirus-northern-italian-towns-close-schools-and-businesses).

Once again: the sudden, precipitous increase in deaths followed the lockdown.

France
The greatest increase in deaths came from the Paris region, so let's take a closer look at that data:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573397/large/1_QZYsGTEVr61TJvTIAvTA4Q.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573397/full/1_QZYsGTEVr61TJvTIAvTA4Q.png)
© John Pospichal/The Economist


Again, the same phenomenon is evident here as elsewhere: no significant increase in deaths until after the lockdown was declared, and then an immediate, precipitous rise.

New York City
Here, the "City lockdown" is shown to have occurred on March 22.

But let's take a closer look. Here is the same data overlaid with lockdown orders:

Purple text denotes state-level orders, red text city-level orders.

Now it's very clear: there was no increase in deaths before the start of lockdowns.

(Note: I plotted the state lockdown on Mar 20, which is when it was announced (https://www.courthousenews.com/teetering-on-lockdown-cuomo-new-york-on-pause/) and went into partial effect.)


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573399/large/1_Bao_fPHQdVNm6jyMSYc20Q.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573399/full/1_Bao_fPHQdVNm6jyMSYc20Q.jpg)
© John Pospichal/The Economist


Let's take a look at one more case.

Ecuador
A severe national lockdown was decreed (https://www.infobae.com/america/america-latina/2020/03/17/el-presidente-lenin-moreno-decreto-el-estado-de-excepcion-en-ecuador-por-el-coronavirus/) in Ecuador on March 16th, and went into effect on March 17th. The Guayas province, which contains Ecuador's most populous city, suffered the highest rate of overall mortality. Here's the mortality chart (from the Financial Times) for that region:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573402/large/1_sXBmKUDJ5Sc6p9yoTlMoFg.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573402/full/1_sXBmKUDJ5Sc6p9yoTlMoFg.jpg)
© Financial Times

And here's a closer look:

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573403/large/1_KXQQ5tRcTprZ_bfPdtDkBA.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573403/full/1_KXQQ5tRcTprZ_bfPdtDkBA.png)
© Robert Rohde/Twitter

Source (https://twitter.com/RARohde/status/1254164130531074048)

As with all the other cases we've examined here — and as with all the countries and cities for which we have good mortality data — only after the lockdown began was there a significant increase in deaths.

All this leads us to the following questions, which we pose to all those who continue to defend the use of lockdowns as an effective means to prevent excess deaths.

Q: Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality, in any country we have good data for, before the start of lockdowns?

Q: Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?

Or:

Q: How is it that governments in every country imposed lockdowns at precisely the same time relative to the future precipitous rise in their populations' overall mortality rate?

And:

Q: How is it, moreover, that this moment in time happened to fall immediately before that precipitous rise?

Most attempts to answer these questions would probably involve the assertion that the authorities in every country had some notion of the true prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic. But we know now that that was not really the case. In the early weeks and months of 2020, testing was extremely limited. This was based, partly, on the assumption that the virus was not yet widespread. As testing was systematically expanded, the number of positive results increased, and this increase was generally believed to correspond to the actual spread of the virus.

Now, posthumous testing has shown (https://www.businessinsider.com/us-probably-had-coronavirus-in-december-but-only-noticed-china-2020-5) that the virus was circulating (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920301643#!) — and killing (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/22/coronavirus-killing-americans-weeks-earlier-than-thought) — weeks, or even months before it was initially detected in many countries. Other researchers are coming (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-study/italys-coronavirus-epidemic-began-in-january-study-shows-idUSKCN2262B1) to the same (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-study/italys-coronavirus-epidemic-began-in-january-study-shows-idUSKCN2262B1) conclusion (https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-might-have-had-almost-11000-covid-19-infections-before-first-case-report/2386680/); the prevalence of the virus was vastly underestimated at the beginning of the pandemic.

Which leads us to our final question:

Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?


Related:


Why Belarus hasn't faced massive spike in deaths despite lack of coronavirus lockdowns (https://www.sott.net/article/435387-Why-Belarus-hasnt-faced-massive-spike-in-deaths-despite-lack-of-coronavirus-lockdowns)

[shaberon]

Q: Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality, in any country we have good data for, before the start of lockdowns?

Q: Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?

Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?



Creepy isn't it?

It's the main issue, the way I would look at it. If you say "something is going on", compare it to how much death is recorded as normally occurring. With disease, don't tell me about case numbers, tell me how many get really sick.

In some places, you do not see mortality spikes at all, there are still decreases. Ok, that would still not give us any reason to ignore the places where, even if no one is sure what they're diagnosing, a stiff is a stiff, and it is not hard to figure out if there are a bit too many of those.

Practically every affected area shows the presence of whatever is being tested, for a month, if not two, before any cases being identified. And, this shows negative for the months before that. So, we can be pretty sure that places were clean in November, and infected in December, in probably every continent, but there is no January wildfire death trend.

Nothing noticeable, until "the announcement".

Then, are death rates dropping because treatment is effective? Or the thing is getting weaker and people more resilient?

It seems to me, the trajectory and effects would have been pretty much the same if nobody did anything. If we were all so dumb as to attribute it to "more flu" and thereby not notice anything, it probably would have been the same spike for about a month, and if you were interested in that sort of thing and checked the statistics, by the time you might say "that's kind of severe", it falls away.

No way to prove it, or explain the lockdown timing. How, exactly, does a recommendation from WHO experts convert into a series of executive orders? The timing comes from their push, right?

[greybeard]

We're targeted for termination...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zlu21LnvD-s&feature=youtu.be

[greybeard]

"It will absolutely happen again!" [Dennis Prager]



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF2rIw27Op0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFDkgxmt5_w

[greybeard]

We're targeted for termination...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zlu21LnvD-s&feature=youtu.be

If you check the projections for UK the loss of life is unbelievable.
Now with a leap of imagination and joining dots.
I really hope I am very very wrong but --- seeing the way Brexit is going --we could well see starvation and this emigration as a huge reason for a greatly reduced population.
Boris is looking for us to crash out of the market without a deal, that would create havoc with the food supply.
Much of our food comes from Europe.
So crashing out may be part of TPDB population reduction plan.
The Georgia Guide Stones mentioned.
The video seems genuine enough but that does not make the projection a forth coming reality.
Thoughts welcome.
Chris

[Gwin Ru]

In the line of premeditated murders:


To US Attorney General: hydroxychloroquine clinical trials intentionally murdering people? (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/22/bill-barr-hcq-clinical-trials-intentionally-murdering-people/)

Jun22 (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/22/bill-barr-hcq-clinical-trials-intentionally-murdering-people/) by Jon Rappoport (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/author/jonrappoport/)

It’s all about the DOSAGE

Mr Barr: You must look into this one. Yesterday. Set your hounds loose.

Summary: Several clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been administering huge doses of the drug to COVID patients—doses that can easily be lethal.

Obviously, if the inexpensive HCQ is said to fail, and is called dangerous, then it is sidelined, in favor of far more expensive (and profitable) drugs. And the promised vaccine has a clear field as the only “reasonable strategy against the pandemic.” Meaning: sky-high profits for the manufacturers.

Get it?

The 6/20/2020 article exposing the crimes is posted at the Alliance for Human Research Protection (ahrp.org): “COVID-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Lethal, Patient-Killing Experimental Endeavor,” (https://ahrp.org/covid-19-has-turned-public-health-into-a-lethal-patient-killing-experimental-endeavor/) by Vera Sharav. Two detailed sections of the article are written by Meryl Nass, MD, who did the investigation to uncover the sordid and astonishing details:
“Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.”

* “Solidarity [experiment] was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine [for the background on that fraudulent report, click here (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/10/covid-fake-study-fake-drug-fake-land-of-loons/)]. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.”

* “Recovery experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.”

“Update: After Dr. Nass’ discovery was publicly disseminated, the WHO suspended the trial on Wednesday June 17th.”

“On Friday, June 19th, Dr. Nass uncovered a third, “Even Worse” hydroxychloroquine experiment. REMAP targets patients who are on a ventilator, or in shock – i.e., near death. Such patients are hardly capable of giving consent. Rather than attempting to save their lives, they are being used given multiple high doses of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs whose combination is contraindicated.”

“Of note: All the online protocols have been stamped ‘Not for IRB (Institutional Review Board) submission’.” [emphasis in original]

“This is an ongoing medical atrocity being perpetrated by medical doctors at 200 sites in 14 countries: include: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States of America.”

“Since all medicines are potential poison at high doses, why one wonders, are influential academic physicians and international public health institutions designing and conducting experiments that expose extremely vulnerable patients to poisonous levels of the drug Hydroxychloroquine?”
The article goes on to spell out, in great detail, how these clinical trials of HCQ have been conducted.

So, Mr. Barr, you should be working with law enforcement in all countries where these horrific studies are being run. The medical perpetrators, and their knowing assistants, need to be arrested and put on trial. No time to waste here. Get busy. You can be sure records have already been hidden, changed, and shredded. Denials of crimes will be couched in technical medical language—
“you civilians couldn’t possibly understand what we’re doing.”
This unconscionable strategy is SOP in such cases.

Jon Rappoport

[greybeard]

ARE YOU VACCINE DEPENDENT?

Straight from the horse's mouth, W.H.O.’s founding director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, Heidi Larson, admits during the Global Vaccine Summit that Big Pharma has made most of the world “vaccine dependent.” Could this be fueling the immense push by health officials to stay in your homes, wear masks, and wait for the Covid-19 #VaccineUnicorn?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp-kw9s8CTU

[greybeard]

The Hidden Agenda Behind The Planned Destruction of America with Rosa Koir

What drives the civil unrest we see unfolding in the streets today? Is this an organic form of resistance against an oppressive system of control? Or is there an ulterior motive striving to restructure the current system of control under the guise of social and racial injustice?

Many are afraid to ask these questions because they may be labeled a racist, for daring to question the legitimacy of the groups who seem to defy the rule of law with complete immunity from the judicial system. At the same time they receive the endorsement of political leaders, celebrities and mega corporations.

In this report Spiro is joined by Rosa Koire, a top expert on the United Nations Agenda 21 who authored the book titled 'Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21'

Spiro and Rosa Koire discuss and break down how the United Nations' long standing global governance agendas are materializing before our eyes hidden just beneath the veil of global crisis and social injustice.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGA18p_XerE

[greybeard]

5-G and C0r0nav1ru6
This video is very powerful, by a Former Vodophone executive.
He makes the link between 5G and Corona virus.
People falling down dead in China is claimed by him to be the result of exposure to 5G.
A full explanation given on the effects on the human body of 5G
Also 5G is needed for the increased use of AI.

All Very convincing



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-721tEuUO0o

[Gwin Ru]

Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Lethal, Patient-Killing Experimental Endeavor (https://ahrp.org/covid-19-has-turned-public-health-into-a-lethal-patient-killing-experimental-endeavor/)

June 20, 2020


https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Meryl-Nass-MD-2.jpg (https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Meryl-Nass-MD-2.jpg)
Meryl Nass, MD


Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than usual of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.


Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial was suspended May 25th following the fraudulent Surgisphere report (https://ahrp.org/the-lancet-published-a-fraudulent-study-editor-calls-it-department-of-error/) in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet (https://ahrp.org/covid-19-has-turned-public-health-into-a-lethal-patient-killing-experimental-endeavor/Lancet%20Editor%20Spills%20the%20Beans%20and%20Britain’s%20PM%20Surrenders%20to%20the%20Gates%20Vacc ine%20Cartel) retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial’s hydroxychloroquine arm, on June 3rd. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.



Recovery is a similar experimental trial conducted in the UK, using very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) died.

Update: After Dr. Nass’ discovery was publicly disseminated, the WHO suspended the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial on Wednesday June 17th.

On Friday, June 19th, Dr. Nass uncovered a third, “Even Worse” hydroxychloroquine experiment. REMAP targets patients who are on a ventilator, or in shock – i.e., near death. Such patients are hardly capable of giving consent. Rather than attempting to save their lives, they are being used given multiple high doses of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs whose combination is contraindicated.

Of note: All the online protocols have been stamped

“Not for IRB (Institutional Review Board) submission,”
This is an ongoing medical atrocity being perpetrated by medical doctors at 200 sites in 14 countries (https://www.remapcap.org/participating-sites): include: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States of America.


https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Paracelsus-knapp-300x255.jpg (https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Paracelsus-knapp.jpg)
Paracelsus


Since all medicines are potential poison at high doses, why one wonders, are influential academic physicians and international public health institutions designing and conducting experiments that expose extremely vulnerable patients to poisonous levels of the drug Hydroxychloroquine?

As recognized by the Swiss physician Paracelsus, “the Hippocrates of the Renaissance”:

https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Dose-Makes-the-Poison-200x300.jpg (https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Dose-Makes-the-Poison.jpg)

“What is there that is not poison? All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Solely the dose determines that a thing is not a poison.”
His insight is as relevant today as it was in the 16th century.

Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician practicing individualized medicine in Maine, in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath. She is a longtime member of the board of the Alliance for Human Research Protection

*******************

Friday, June 19, 2020
Even worse than ‘Recovery,’ potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine study in patients near death (https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/even-worse-than-recovery-potentially.html)

What could be worse than giving potentially lethal doses of hydroxychloroquine (http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/who-trial-using-potentially-fatal.html) to Hospitalized Covid-19 patients?

The REMAP-Covid study is using the same HCQ dose as the Recovery trial (https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-2020-05-14.pdf) for 6 days. But it is even worse for the following reasons:


You have to be close to death, either on a ventilator or in shock, on pressor medications, to be included in the trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02735707), according to the trial documents. However, in a talk (https://player.rcplondon.ac.uk/video/1_9wxiht1d) by Professor Anthony Gordon, HFNO, CPAP and NIV are additionally said to be inclusion criteria.



You may receive HCQ alone, or HCQ in combination with 2 more drugs, lopinavir/ritonavir. Yet lopinavir/ritonavir predisposes to QT prolongation, as does HCQ, and the drug label states, “Avoid use in combination with QTc- or PR-interval prolonging drugs.”



Patients who are in shock or on a ventilator may be unable to give their consent to enroll in a clinical trial. But the trial investigators have deemed that consent may not be required (bodyhttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cde3c7d9a69340001d79ffe/t/5ea3fddb1de102540e627663/1587805670273/REMAP-CAP+COVID-19+Immunoglobulin+Therapy+Domain-Specific+Appendix+V1-+19+April+2020_WM.pdf): “For patients who are not competent to consent, either prospective agreement or entry via waiver of consent or some form of deferred consent can be applied, as required by an appropriate ethical review body.”



For patients too sick to swallow a pill, the drug will be administered via a feeding tube. This could entail an extra procedure for patients.

From the Covid protocol (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cde3c7d9a69340001d79ffe/t/5ea3fd83f222897b8d528195/1587805583231/REMAP-CAP+-+COVID-19+Antiviral+Domain-Specific+Appendix+V2.0+-+01+April+2020_WM.pdf) page 23:
“Dosing will be hydroxychloroquine administered by the enteral route. A loading dose is important because of the large volume of distribution. The loading dose will be 800 mg, administered 6-hourly, until 2 doses have been administered. Subsequently, starting 12 hours after the first loading dose, the dose will be 400 mg administered 12-hourly for 12 doses. The preferred method of administration is tablets swallowed whole but, if a patient is unable to swallow, crushed tablets dispersed in water can be administered via an enteral tube (a large bore gastric tube is preferred). No dose adjustment is required when hydroxychloroquine is administered via a gastric tube. No dose adjustment is necessary for renal dysfunction or concomitant use of renal replacement therapy. Clinicians should consider a dose adjustment in the presence of liver failure, however no dose adjustment is necessary for abnormal liver function tests in the absence of liver failure."
This is 2400 mg hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hrs, over 1.86 g of the “base,” then 800 mg/day for 5 more days or until discharge from the ICU, or 6.4 g total. Dosing fails to take into account weight, renal and hepatic function.

The ignorant doctors who justified toxic doses by invoking ‘volume of distribution’ (which is 40,000 liters) failed to notice that the high ‘volume of distribution’ is an artifact related to the drug accumulating in tissue (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122276/) as opposed to plasma. Drug levels in lung are 200-700 times higher than in plasma. Furthermore, “renal and hepatic insufficiency lead to higher plasma concentrations for a given daily dose and raise the risk of toxicity. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122276/)”

WHO’s consultant Weniger reported (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/65773/WHO_MAL_79.906.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y) in 1979 that a single dose of 1.5-2 g of chloroquine “base” “may be fatal.” A detailed discussion of therapeutic and toxic doses of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can be found in my article (http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/who-trial-using-potentially-fatal.html) of June 14. I acknowledge that hydroxychloroquine is a bit less toxic than chloroquine. But this trial studies the most fragile human beings, and if the trial investigators were unsure of the right dose, they should have “started low and gone slow (https://www.yalecancercenter.org/research/education/YaleCares_January2008_90469_284_12079_v1.pdf)” as clinicians are advised to do.

The REMAP study protocol acknowledges that the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia, but states that the risk is mitigated because patients this sick will be on cardiac monitors, with QTc monitoring. However, it fails to say that the most likely arrhythmia in this setting is torsade de points, which is very difficult to treat. Patients who are already critically ill are unlikely to survive if it occurs. So why use such an excessive hydroxychloroquine dose on these, or any, patients, and risk it? That is not explained.

The REMAP clinical trial is ongoing in 200 sites in 14 countries (https://www.remapcap.org/participating-sites). They include: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, USA.

All their online protocols have been stamped “Not for IRB (Institutional Review Board) submission,” which makes one wonder what was changed when the trial arms were put before IRBs for approval.

Five UK chief medical officers wrote a “Dear Colleague” letter (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cde3c7d9a69340001d79ffe/t/5e8d413e713b2d6cd799e143/1586315583723/CEM_CMO_2020_012.pdf), begging physicians to enroll their Covid patients in clinical trials, including ‘Recovery’ and REMAP, and discouraging “off-label” treatments for Covid outside of trials. Did they know they were asking treating physicians to significantly up the risk of death for their patients? Are they aware that as of today, June 19, the UK has had more deaths (https://www.newscientist.com/article/2237475-covid-19-news-uk-coronavirus-alert-level-lowered-from-four-to-three/) from Covid-19 than any country in the world outside the US and Brazil, with 5 and 3 times the UK population, respectively.

Why is public health being turned on its head? This is the third major, multicenter clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine testing toxic doses on Covid patients. The Recovery (https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-2020-05-14.pdf) and Solidarity (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments) trials (with almost identical toxic HCQ doses as REMAP) abruptly ended their hydroxychloroquine studies in the past two weeks, coincidentally as people began noticing the excessive doses, especially on Twitter. Who or what is willing to maim and kill patients in order to to kill hydroxychloroquine’s use in Covid-19?

********

WHO and UK trials using potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose–according to WHO consultant,

posted June 14, 2020

The Solidarity Trial (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments)is a WHO-led conglomeration of many national trials of treatments for Covid-19. (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments) Per the WHO (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments):
As of 3 June 2020, more than 3500 patients have been recruited in 35 countries, with over 400 hospitals actively recruiting patients. Overall, over 100 countries have joined or expressed an interest in joining the trial, and WHO is actively supporting 60 of them…
The hydroxychloroquine arm of the Solidarity trials restarted enrolling patients June 3, after being halted May 25 (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments) by WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus and the Executive Group of the Solidarity Trial. (The hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) arm of the trials was stopped after publication of the Lancet Surgisphere study, which claimed 35% higher death rates in patients who received hydroxychloroquine, but the study was retracted (https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/05/hydroxychloroquine-keeping-you-updated.html) when no one could verify that the Surgisphere database existed).

Below are the drugs being tested in Solidarity (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments):


Remdesivir



Hydroxychloroquine



Lopinavir with Ritonavir



Lopinavir with Ritonavir plus Interferon beta-1a.

However, the doses were not specified on WHO’s list of the drugs to be trialed, nor were the actual doses specified, surprisingly, in WHO’s consultation on chloroquine (CQ) dosing (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/informal-consultation-on-the-dose-of-chloroquine-and-hydroxychloroquine-for-the-solidarity-clinical-trial---8-april-2020), dated April 8. Instead, the introduction of the report of that meeting notes,
“The chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine schedule selected for the trial includes two oral loading doses (250 mg per tablet CQ or 200 mg per tablet HCQ), then oral twice-daily maintenance doses for ten days. This meeting convened to discuss the appropriateness of the selected doses for the trial.”
Last week, I was alerted to the fact that India’s ICMR, its official medical research agency, had written (https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/29/icmr-writes-to-who-disagreeing-with-hcq-assessment-officials-say-international-trial-dosage-four-ti-2149702.html) to the WHO, telling WHO that the hydroxychloroquine doses being used in the Solidarity trial were 4 times higher than the doses being used in India. Then I learned that Singapore has been hesitant to participate in the WHO trial, due to the hydroxychloroquine dose.

The UK “Recovery” trial was one part of the international Solidarity conglomeration of clinical trials. The trial ended its HCQ arm on June 4, reporting no benefit (https://www.recoverytrial.net/news/statement-from-the-chief-investigators-of-the-randomised-evaluation-of-covid-19-therapy-recovery-trial-on-hydroxychloroquine-5-june-2020-no-clinical-benefit-from-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-in-hospitalised-patients-with-covid-19). In-hospital mortality of the 1542 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was 25.7%, or 396 people.

The Recovery trial Study Protocol (https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-2020-05-14.pdf) notes it is funded in part by the Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and by UK government agencies. The Protocol (https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-2020-05-14.pdf)provides the doses of hydroxychloroquine used, on page 22. Twitter users began to notice a dosing issue, with hashtag #Recoverygate.

The quote from the WHO report on dosing, 4 paragraphs ago, seems to be deliberately vague or even misleading, as the actual dose used in the Solidarity and Recovery trials is 12 tablets during the first 24 hours (800mg initial dose, 800 mg six hours later, 400 mg 6 hrs later, 400 mg 6 hours later), then 400 mg every 12 hours for 9 more days. This is 2,400 mg during the first 24 hours, and a cumulative dose of 9.2 grams over 10 days.

While I could not find the WHO HCQ dosing on the WHO website, co-Principal Investigators of the Recovery trial, Drs. Peter Horby and Martin Landray, claimed they followed the WHO dosing. Landray also told the periodical Paris Soir he was using the same hydroxychloroquine dose used for amebiasis. However, the accepted use for HCQ in amebiasis is only for a liver abscess and only then in pregnancy (https://www.uptodate.com/contents/extraintestinal-entamoeba-histolytica-amebiasis?search=amebiasis%20hepatic&sectionRank=1&usage_type=default&anchor=H4&source=machineLearning&selectedTitle=1~150&display_rank=1#H10), when other drugs cannot be used. That dose is 600 mg per day for 2 days, then 300 mg per day, less than half the Recovery dose. Professor Horby said that Paris Soir misinterpreted Landray’s comments, but Paris Soir said Landray had confirmed (http://covexit.com/oxford-professor-horby-claims-professor-landray-was-misquoted-france-soir-newspaper-denies-it/) what he told them in an email.

We also know, from an official Belgian guideline document issued June 8 (https://covid-19.sciensano.be/sites/default/files/Covid19/COVID-19_InterimGuidelines_Treatment_ENG.pdf), that high doses were used not only by Recovery in the UK, but also by the Discovery trial in the EU and by the WHO.

We also know that in Brazil, both a high dose and a low dose were trialed, and by April 17 (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41591-020-00011-3) the high dose arm was stopped prematurely (http://covexit.com/oxford-professor-horby-claims-professor-landray-was-misquoted-france-soir-newspaper-denies-it/) due to an excess of deaths. The low dose trial continues in Brazil.

How is the drug hydroxychloroquine normally used? For chronic daily use in systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, patients usually receive between 200 and 400 mg daily. In acute Q fever, 600 mg daily may be given at the start of treatment.

We also know from WHO’s March 13 Informal consultation on the potential role of chloroquine (https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/RD-Blueprint-expert-group-on-CQ-call-Mar-13-2020.pdf) that the Gates Foundation had been studying the drug’s pharmacokinetics, and of the 25 participants at this meeting (https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/RD-Blueprint-expert-group-on-CQ-call-Mar-13-2020.pdf), 5 were from the Gates Foundation.

The only treatment dose mentioned in their report (https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/RD-Blueprint-expert-group-on-CQ-call-Mar-13-2020.pdf) was in a paragraph about preventive doses. It said,
“Higher doses would be considered for treatment, i.e., 10mg/kg base, followed by 5mg/kg twice daily for seven days.”
What is the “base”? A 200 mg dose of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine contains 155 mg “base” (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/009768s041lbl.pdf) drug.

The typical 70 kg person would, if this suggestion had been followed, receive 700 mg base, or 900 mg of hydroxychloroquine, as a loading dose. Generally, a loading dose refers only to a first dose, not to several additional doses within 24 hours, but it can potentially refer to more.

What is a toxic dose? All experts agree. “… chloroquine has a small toxic to therapeutic margin,” according to Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. It is very safe when used correctly in the right patients, but a bit more can potentially kill. Prof. Nicholas White, who attended both WHO consultations on the chloroquines, has mentioned this.

The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs. Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of hydroxychloroquine base “may be fatal. (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/65773/WHO_MAL_79.906.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)”

The Recovery trial used 1.860 grams hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients, a potentially lethal dose.

The dose used in the Recovery trial is not recommended for therapy of any medical condition, which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacology textbook, the drug’s label (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/009768s041lbl.pdf), and the online medical encyclopedia UptoDate.

This excessive dose apparently continues to be used in WHO Solidarity trials in countries around the world. It appears that the Solidarity trials are not testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather testing whether patients tolerate toxic, nontherapeutic doses.

The WHO Solidarity trials, in order to rapidly enroll patients and spare clinicians a lot of paperwork, collect only limited information on side effects. No information has yet been provided regarding causes of death in the completed hydroxychloroquine arm of the Recovery trial, in which 396 patients died.

The Solidarity trial design being employed by WHO may help obscure whether mortality is due to drug toxicity (in which case, one would expect cause of death to be arrhythmias such as torsade de points, neuropsychiatric effects, or hypoglycemia) versus Covid-19.

The WHO report of its meeting on chloroquine dosing (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/informal-consultation-on-the-dose-of-chloroquine-and-hydroxychloroquine-for-the-solidarity-clinical-trial---8-april-2020) states,
“Although the preponderance of opinion tilted towards a reasonable benefit risk profile for the intervention, there was some scepticism about what was considered a ‘minimalistic safety data collection’ currently included in the protocol.”
The high dose regimen being used in the Solidarity trials has no medical justification. The trial design, with its limited collection of safety data, may make it more difficult to identify toxic drug effects, compared to standard drug trials. This is entirely unethical.

Excessive dosing makes it impossible to assess therapeutic benefit, if any, of HCQ.
Giving the drug only to hospitalized patients means that the window of time during which HCQ would be expected to provide the most benefit, when viral titers are rising, has passed.

To sum up:


HCQ is being given in non-therapeutic, toxic dose



HCQ is being given too late in the disease course to determine its value against SAR-CoV-2.



Limited safety data in the Solidarity trials serves to protect trial investigators and sponsors from disclosure of adverse drug effects, including death



I suspect WHO has been deliberately misleading regarding the doses chosen.



The conclusions to be drawn are frightening:





a) WHO and other national health agencies, and charities, have designed huge clinical trials to assure that hydroxychloroquine will fail to show benefit, presumably to advantage its much more expensive competitor(s) and vaccines in development.







b) In so doing, these agencies and charities have conspired to increase the number of deaths in these trials.







c) In so doing, they have conspired to deprive billions of people from potentially benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug during a major pandemic. This could lead to prolongation of the pandemic and many increased cases and deaths.



My recommendation is for WHO to immediately stop using this dosing schedule, give trial subjects clinically appropriate doses, and collect more complete safety data. I would remind WHO that if the consent forms fail to inform patients that the dose of HCQ they may receive is much higher than for any other indication, that WHO may be subject to legal action for injuries incurred in its sham of a clinical trial.

**************

[Gwin Ru]

Gates’ Dream of Controlling the World is Hitting a Brick Wall (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/russia/gates-dream-of-controlling-the-world-is-hitting-a-brick-wall/)

Blog (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/blog)
by Martin Armstrong
Posted Jun 24, 2020


https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Gates-Childrend-Defense.jpg (https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Gates-Childrend-Defense.jpg)


Bill Gates and Microsoft have been banned in Russia. This is seriously preventing Bill Gates’ dream of vaccinating the entire world so he can track everyone.

Russia is going to add Bill Gates to the blacklist along with George Soros and Jacob Rothschild.

The entire scheme of Microsoft and the others is to take everything that we do, create profiles, and then sell that to companies to endlessly market stuff to us. If I am paying for a program like Windows, I do not want endless updates that are really phishing for everything I do. They are not satisfied with paying for a product. They much destroy all privacy for a buck.

It is ironic that perhaps the only free countries will be China and Russia since the West has chosen to run into the arms of Gates and his consortium.

Russia and China collapsed under Marxism in 1989. We are now faced with the second wave of Marxists determined to create a Marxist world despite the fact it has never worked.

Guess what — they are right on time. The collapse of Communism was 1989.95; add 31.4 years, and we arrive at 2021.35 perfectly as we head into the Monetary Crisis Cycle.

Putin is at least protecting the Russian people against the manufactured pandemic. There are about 9.5 million (https://ourworldindata.org/how-many-people-in-the-world-die-from-cancer) people who die every year from cancer compared to Bill Gates’ virus of fewer than 500,000 deaths worldwide.

About 645,000 (https://www.healthline.com/health/heart-disease/statistics#1) die of heart attacks annually. There are about 15.2 million (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death) deaths annually from various diseases. We do not hear about that every night on CNN delivering a daily death count. If they did, it would probably also change behavior.

In comparison, Gates’ virus is overly exaggerated for the sole purpose of terrorizing people into complying with his agenda and to defeat Trump to usher in the New Marxist Green Order.

[Harmony]

The Hidden Agenda Behind The Planned Destruction of America with Rosa Koir

What drives the civil unrest we see unfolding in the streets today? Is this an organic form of resistance against an oppressive system of control? Or is there an ulterior motive striving to restructure the current system of control under the guise of social and racial injustice?

Many are afraid to ask these questions because they may be labeled a racist, for daring to question the legitimacy of the groups who seem to defy the rule of law with complete immunity from the judicial system. At the same time they receive the endorsement of political leaders, celebrities and mega corporations.

In this report Spiro is joined by Rosa Koire, a top expert on the United Nations Agenda 21 who authored the book titled 'Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21'

Spiro and Rosa Koire discuss and break down how the United Nations' long standing global governance agendas are materializing before our eyes hidden just beneath the veil of global crisis and social injustice.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGA18p_XerE

I would like to bump this video interview with Rosa Koire. It is short, straight to the point of what is being rolled out right now. Not just in America, but you can hear and recognise all the key words used in the media in many countries currently, and certainly Australia and New Zealand too.

Unfortunately, my little computer won't let me put the cute "bump" icon up 😊






Mod note from Bill: All the Avalon smilies can be added in by using their keyboard code. So for the "bump" smiley, one can just type :bump: .

:bump:

:)

[shaberon]

Bill Gates and Microsoft have been banned in Russia. This is seriously preventing Bill Gates’ dream of vaccinating the entire world so he can track everyone.

Russia is going to add Bill Gates to the blacklist along with George Soros and Jacob Rothschild.


...It is ironic that perhaps the only free countries will be China and Russia since the West has chosen to run into the arms of Gates and his consortium.




I wonder if we can find precisely what "banned" means?

Old communism--sent from the west--I am told is not "true" communism according to theory, but a "communist-themed" form of totalitarianism like we face now.

It was degraded--by sending in the "other" western thing, consumerism.

Consumerism had a lifespan of only a few years, there, and then there was a wave of getting rid of western NGOs and the like.

I am pretty sure that Russia and China and at least some of their "sphere of influence" is pretty resistant to Gates and the like, but, it is hard to tell if this means they get arrested if they show up in the country, or all of their assets are seized, or if it is just fluffy PR to let their "methods" in, without being attached to any names.

[greybeard]

Global Goal: Unite for Our Future Summit Live

Join us Saturday, June 27 at 9 a.m. ET for a two-hour virtual broadcast of the Global Goal: Unite for Our Future summit. This campaign is combatting the disproportionate impact COVID-19 has on marginalized communities — including people of color, those living in extreme poverty, and others facing discrimination – and calls on world leaders to commit billions of dollars to make testing, treatments, and vaccines available to everyone, everywhere,




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html

Out of the goodness of their heart OH YEAH!!!
Chris

[DaveToo]

Global Goal: Unite for Our Future Summit Live

Join us Saturday, June 27 at 9 a.m. ET for a two-hour virtual broadcast of the Global Goal: Unite for Our Future summit. This campaign is combatting the disproportionate impact COVID-19 has on marginalized communities — including people of color, those living in extreme poverty, and others facing discrimination – and calls on world leaders to commit billions of dollars to make testing, treatments, and vaccines available to everyone, everywhere,




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html

Out of the goodness of their heart OH YEAH!!!
Chris

I was sucked into clicking on the link thinking they were the good guys!
Sneaky bastards.
Hijacking our language to promote their sick propaganda.

I think the only apropos thing is that they added this to the "Entertainment" section.

[greybeard]

Global Goal: Unite for Our Future Summit Live

Join us Saturday, June 27 at 9 a.m. ET for a two-hour virtual broadcast of the Global Goal: Unite for Our Future summit. This campaign is combatting the disproportionate impact COVID-19 has on marginalized communities — including people of color, those living in extreme poverty, and others facing discrimination – and calls on world leaders to commit billions of dollars to make testing, treatments, and vaccines available to everyone, everywhere,




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/global-goal-unite-future-summit-231815640.html

Out of the goodness of their heart OH YEAH!!!
Chris

I was sucked into clicking on the link thinking they were the good guys!
Sneaky bastards.
Hijacking our language to promote their sick propaganda.

I think the only apropos thing is that they added this to the "Entertainment" section.

Its Blatant propaganda -- another thing for people to go out in the streets and clap their hands to.
There was a chance to comment in Yahoo and I did as did several other like minded people.
Wonder if those comments gets taken down.
Its a bit like asking those in concentration camps to pay for the gas thats going to kill them.

It amazes me how easy it is to con people and how hard it is to show them they have been conned.
God only knows where this is going.
However I genuinely feel that there will be divine intervention in some form and all will be just fine -- eventually.
Meanwhile we have to keep sharing the truth in the hope that enough people will get it.

Chris

[DeeMetrios]

Perhaps the vaccine that they will create will only weaken our system so it makes it more easier to get this covid bug ?

[Gwin Ru]

...



https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574580/full/Outlook_vvlhxzp5_600x384.jpg

[norman]

Is This Torture?


3yk3xezML8Q

[onawah]

Horrifying Aspect of COVID-19 That Few Talk About
How COVID-19 Will Affect Medical Malpractice and You
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 22, 2020

(MANY HYPERLINKS IN THE ARTICLE NOT EMBEDDED HERE)

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/22/how-covid-19-affects-medical-malpractice.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20200722Z1&mid=DM600301&rid=922329108

"It's a largely hidden issue of the pandemic, but it's happening in far more than one hospital in this country. If you become seriously ill with COVID-19 and your life falls into the hands of medical professionals, this new reality could have unimaginable consequences.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
A largely hidden issue of the COVID-19 pandemic is the risk of medical malpractice, and the consequences for you, health care workers and hospitals alike
New Jersey has granted civil and criminal immunity to health care providers battling COVID-19. Sweeping civil and criminal immunity has also been granted in New York, including for nursing home executives
Michigan, Massachusetts, Illinois and Connecticut have also issued immunity laws for malpractice related to COVID-19, and Iowa lawmakers introduced a bill to grant broad protections to health care providers, hospitals, nursing homes and a variety of other businesses in early June
The problem with handing out broad immunity to any and all health care providers and executives is that it may lower the quality of care. If you know you cannot be sued under any circumstance, you’re less likely to take all the precautions necessary to avoid making a mistake
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many doctors have been asked to provide care outside their area of expertise, which increases the risk of errors occurring

A largely hidden issue of the COVID-19 pandemic is the risk of medical malpractice, and the consequences for patients, health care workers and hospitals alike. As noted by Epic Brokers:1

“There is … a risk of increased professional liability claims arising from COVID-19. Claims for alleged failures to properly test, treat, or diagnose are expected.

Negotiations are ongoing with state and federal governments to provide immunities to providers on the front lines of COVID-19 response. Some states have granted immunity to front line healthcare providers and healthcare organizations, as well as expanded ‘good Samaritan’ protections.”

Indeed, New Jersey2 has granted full immunity — both civil and criminal — to health care providers battling COVID-19. Sweeping civil and criminal immunity has also been granted in New York. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo who, against federal guidelines, ordered ill equipped nursing homes to accept COVID-19 patients, also granted immunity to nursing home executives.

The immunity rule was reportedly3 issued after the Greater New York Hospital Association donated more than $1 million to the New York State Democratic Committee. Two New York legislators have since introduced a bill that would repeal Cuomo’s blanket immunity.4

If you know you cannot be sued under any circumstance, you’re less likely to take all the precautions necessary to avoid making a mistake.
Michigan, Massachusetts, Illinois and Connecticut have also issued immunity laws,5 and Iowa lawmakers introduced a bill to grant broad protections to health care providers, hospitals, nursing homes and a variety of other businesses in early June.6

Medical Errors Are Third Leading Cause of Death in the US
The problem with handing out broad immunity to any and all health care providers and executives is that it may lower the quality of care. If you know you cannot be sued under any circumstance, you’re less likely to take all the precautions necessary to avoid making a mistake.

It is likely this immunity to prosecution led to the egregious ethical and medical breeches documented by the undercover nurse Erin Marie Olszewski at the epicenter of the pandemic, Elmhurst Hospital in New York, which you can see in the section below.

Even without the pandemic, medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S., according to Johns Hopkins patient safety experts.7 According to their data, 9.5% of all annual deaths stem from medical errors, including misdiagnoses and treatment mistakes. The situation may be even worse than that, however.

According to the 2017 paper,8 “Your Health Care May Kill You: Medical Errors,” more than 90% of medical errors go unreported. Even so, medical error rates in the U.S. are “significantly higher” than those in other developed countries, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany and the U.K., the paper notes.9

The 2017 Commonwealth Fund report,10 “Mirror, Mirror 2017: International Comparison Reflects Flaws and Opportunities for Better U.S. Health Care” also points out that the U.S. health care system continually ranks LAST in patient outcomes when compared to other high-income nations. This, despite the fact that the U.S. health care system outspends all other countries.
Nurse on the Frontlines of COVID-19 Shares Her Experience
UIDsKdeFOmQ
While it’s important to not hold health care workers to irrational standards in the midst of an outbreak of a novel, never-before-seen disease, giving everyone a free pass no matter how obviously egregious their negligence can also put patients at unnecessary risk.

A standout case in point is the Elmhurst Hospital Center, a public hospital in Queens, New York, which has been “the epicenter of the epicenter” of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. In a heavily censored interview, nurse Erin Olszewski addresses a number of problems at Elmhurst, including the hospital’s:

Rule to not resuscitate COVID-19 patients
Lax personal protective equipment (PPE) standards
Failure to segregate COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients, thereby ensuring maximum spread of the disease among noninfected patients coming in with other health problems
Listing COVID-19 negative tests as positive
Routine use of mechanical ventilation of all COVID-19 patients
Of these, the seemingly systematic mislabeling of negative COVID-19 tests as positive and the routine use of mechanical ventilation are perhaps the most abhorrent, as it has undoubtedly led to the unnecessary death of many.

In her undercover video, Olszewski talks about how a stroke patient ended up contracting the disease due to being placed in the same room as a COVID-positive patient. He ended up on mechanical ventilation, drastically increasing his chances of dying due to lung damage.

Part of why mechanical ventilation is so dangerous is because you are given sedatives and paralytics. You’re essentially asleep for the duration, which could be up to a month. “There’s no way you can recover from something like that,” Olszewski says. What’s worse, according to Olszewski, many patients are not even told that they will be put to sleep. They’re merely told they will receive breathing assistance.

In a chilling conversation, a physician states that not a single patient has been successfully extubated and released since the pandemic began, and many of these weren’t even COVID-19 positive to begin with. In a case like this, should hospital staff and administrators really get off scot-free?

July Is Medical Malpractice Awareness Month
A July 2, 2020, blog post11 by the law firm Ashcraft & Gerel lists “10 surprising facts about medical negligence and error in the U.S.” Among them:

More than 92% of American and Canadian physicians report having been involved in a medical error and “near misses”
1 in 25 hospital patients develops a preventable infection during their stay
1 in 4 Medicare patients is injured or killed by medical negligence in the hospital
Human failures are responsible for 80% to 90% of all medical errors
An estimated 1 in 3 seniors receiving care in skilled nursing facilities experience preventable adverse events
Despite the continuous rise in preventable medical errors, the rate of successful medical malpractice claims declined 55.7% between 1992 and 2014. Even when there’s strong evidence of negligence, physicians are acquitted half of the time, and up to 90% of medical malpractice claims are dropped without payout.

Pandemic Accelerates Risk Management Changes
UVhFRoBx7JU
According to The Health Care Blog,12 “the pandemic might ultimately … accelerate changes in the way health care organizations think about risk management and their insurance coverage for it.”

In the video above, Margaret Nekic, CEO of Inspirien — a hospital-and-physician-owned medical malpractice and worker’s comp insurance company — discusses how liability carriers are responding to the changes brought by COVID-19.

For example, during this pandemic, many doctors have been asked to provide care outside their area of expertise, which increases the risk of errors occurring. They’re also using modified equipment. Of course, SARS-CoV-2, being a novel virus, did not, and still doesn’t, have a clear-cut treatment strategy, and doctors have had to experiment and innovate.

Health care workers are also providing testing outside of medical facilities, and while doctors are typically covered by their malpractice insurance regardless of where they work, most nurses are covered by the hospital in which they work, and may therefore not be covered if they’re providing testing or care in other facilities.

The Problem With Standard of Care
Now, while Johns Hopkins researchers have identified “unwarranted variation in physician practice patterns that lack accountability” as one of the primary contributors to medical errors,13 one could just as easily argue that the requirement to adhere to “standard of care” protocols may actually be part of the problem.

Doctors are afraid to deviate from the standard of care, even when they disagree with it wholesale or believe it might not be in a specific patient’s best interest, because this is the easiest way to get sued for malpractice.

It’s “easier” to let someone die than risk losing their medical license by doing something differently. This includes prescribing dangerous medications based on generalized recommendations rather than following a more individualized system of care.

As it pertains to COVID-19, we’ve seen how Elmhurst hospital has continued using mechanical ventilation even though front-line workers and researchers have stepped forward, warning that ventilation kills more COVID-19 patients than it saves and doesn’t appear to be an appropriate treatment for this disease.

We’ve also seen how early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and zinc, despite getting high marks from critical care doctors around the world, has been suppressed in the U.S. — based on fraudulent research, I might add — and both doctors and pharmacists have been warned they risk losing their medical license if they prescribe it.14 This, despite the fact that there really is no other carefully vetted COVID-19 treatment available yet, as potential therapeutics are still under investigation.

‘Pious’ Patients Are Most Likely to Die
Back in 2012, I interviewed Dr. Andrew Saul about his book, “Hospitals and Health: Your Orthomolecular Guide to a Shorter Hospital Stay,” in which he discusses the risks hospitalized patients face.

In it, he points out that knowing how to play “the hospital game” can help save your life. Importantly, so-called pious patients — those who keep quiet and question nothing — are the most likely to get killed.

One of the best ways to safeguard your health and life during a hospital stay is to bring a personal advocate, someone who can speak up for you and ensure you’re given proper care — especially if you’re so sick you cannot do so yourself.

Unfortunately, this pandemic has prevented family members from visiting those that are hospitalized to act as their advocates. Many times, this leaves them at the mercy of hospital staff and physicians that are immune from prosecution and negatively motivated to consider any natural therapy, even something as simple as vitamin D, for fear of repercussions from violating the “standard of care.”

This makes it even more important, if you are ever hospitalized now, to question everything. It’s also important to remember you have the right to do so. As noted by Saul in that interview:

“The most important thing to remember is this: the hospital power structure. No matter what hospital you go into … the most powerful person in the most entire hospital system is the patient …

You might have set that up with a document. If you have a power of attorney, a living will, or other types of paperwork or someone is responsible, then we know who’s responsible. But let’s say that it’s just an ordinary situation — the patient has the most power — [but] the system works on the assumption that the patient will not claim that power …

A patient can say, ‘No. Do not touch me.’ And they can’t. If they do, it’s assault, and you can call the police. Now, they might say, ‘Well, on your way in, you signed this form.’ You can unsign it. You can revoke your permission.

Just because somebody has permission to do one thing, it doesn’t mean that they have the permission to do everything. There’s no such thing as a situation that you cannot reverse … the patient has the potential to put a stop to anything; absolutely anything.

If the patient doesn’t know that, if they’re not conscious, or if they just don’t have the moxie to do it, the next most powerful person is the spouse. The spouse has enormous influence and can do almost as much as the patient. If the patient is incapacitated, the spouse can probably do much more than the patient.

If there is no spouse present, the next most powerful people in the system are the children of the patient … You’ll notice that I haven’t noticed doctors or hospital administrators once. That’s because they don’t have the power. They really don’t. They just want you to think that [they] do.

It is an illusion that they run the place. The answer is — you do. They’re offering you products and services, and they’re trying to get you to accept them without question …

[W]hen you go to the hospital, bring along a black Sharpie pen, and cross out anything that you don’t like in the contract. Put big giant X’s through entire clauses and pages, and do not sign it. And when they say, ‘We’re not going to admit you,’ you say, ‘Please put it in writing that you refuse to admit me.’

What do you think your lawyers are going to do with that? They have to [admit you]. They absolutely have to … It’s a game, and you can win it. But you can’t win it if you don’t know the rules. And basically, they don’t tell you the rules. In [the book] ‘Hospitals and Health,’ we do.”

Surviving COVID-19
There are no easy answers when it comes to COVID-19, but considering you may not have the ability to sue for malpractice under any circumstance (depending on where you live), taking a keen interest in your treatment would be advisable.

I’ve written several articles over the past few months detailing some of the treatments that appear to be among the most effective, such as the MATH+ Protocol and early intervention with hydroxychloroquine and zinc.

For home use, at first sign of symptoms, you could try quercetin in lieu of hydroxychloroquine, as the primary mechanism of action in COVID-19 is their ability to shuttle zinc into your cells, and it is the zinc that provides most of the benefits. Ketone esters may also be helpful for certain symptoms.

Importantly, rather than waiting for a likely harmful vaccine, get proactive and start optimizing your vitamin D level. You can learn more about this in “The Most Important Paper Dr. Mercola Has Ever Written” and “How to Fix the COVID-19 Crisis in 30 Days.”

As the old adage goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Your safest bet to avoid becoming a medical error statistic is to stay out of the hospital, and to avoid hospitalization for COVID-19, you really need to focus on strengthening your immune function and reversing any underlying comorbidities such as insulin resistance and obesity."

+ Sources and References
1 Epic Brokers Medical Malpractice Update Q2 2020
2 Fox Rothchild April 15, 2020
3 Fox News May 27, 2020
4 NY Post June 12, 2020
5 Law 360 Six states with covid-19 medical immunity
6 AP News June 3, 2020
7, 13 Johns Hopkins May 3, 2016
8, 9 Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;234:13-17
10 Commonwealth Fund, Mirror, Mirror 2017: International Comparison Reflects Flaws and Opportunities for Better U.S. Health Care, July 2017 (PDF)
11 Ashcraft & Gerel July 2, 2020
12 The Health Care Blog April 15, 2020
14 The Conservative Tree House March 27, 2020

[onawah]

[B]Technocratic Coup Advancing Rapidly – Is this the America You Want?
7/23/20
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/the-technocratic-coup-is-advancing-rapidly-is-this-the-america-you-want/
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/Is-this-the-America-you-Want.jpg

"by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Do you know what “technocracy” means? If not, it is time you learn about it, because we are currently going through what technocracy expert Patrick Wood says is a Coup D’état as the technocrats take over the world, literally.

Mr. Wood was interviewed this week by Spiro Skouras of Activist Post, and he stated:

The whole world right now is laboring under the same issues that we are laboring in our country. That is, the Great Panic of 2020…

The technocrats who are pushing technocracy globally have finally succeeded in springing the trap on the entire planet.

And in the process, they have shut down the entire global economic system.

Around the world people in other countries are looking to America to save the world…. and it’s not going to be our government that does it, it’s the American citizens like you and me….

https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/The-Technocrat.jpg

Technocracy is not all that new, and has been around since the 1930s here in the U.S.

In their publication The Technocrat published in 1938, they defined “technocracy” as:

the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent.

Mr. Wood explains that technocracy was not developed as a political structure.

It was not a political system. They hated politicians. They wanted to do away with the entire political structure, and simply manage the economy.

They wanted to do it using what they call this “science of social engineering.”

Mr. Wood gives some examples of contemporary technocrats who are involved in the “science of social engineering”:

Dr. Anthony Fauci
Al Gore
Robert McNamara, the Secretary of Defense during the Vietnam war
Bill Gates
Elon Musk
Eric Schmidt (Google)
Jeff Bezos (Amazon.com)
Wood says:

These people are not communists. They’re not socialists, and they’re not Marxists.

They’re technocrats. (who believe in social engineering)

The goals of the technocrats today are embodied in the United Nations’s “sustainable development” goals and part of the New World Order agenda, which is primarily an economic system, and not a political system.

Both Spiro and Mr. Wood made reference to President Dwight Eisenhower’s farewell speech at the end of his 8 years in office, on January 17, 1961, where he warned about the danger of the technocrats. One quote:

Today, the solitary inventor tinkering in his shop has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists. In laboratories and testing fields in the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountain head of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge cost of research, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity.

For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present, and is greatly to be regarded.

Yet in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

Watch the full speech:
OyBNmecVtdU

Mr. Wood elaborates on the fact that the goal of the technocrats is an economic system, and not a political system. They want a “Scientific Dictatorship.”

This was the driving force behind the eugenics movement in the U.S. during the 1930s and 1940s, and led to forced sterilization laws being imposed on “genetically inferior” women the technocrats did not want to continue breeding.

This is a result of social engineering by the technocrats.

I still see this at the United Nations today, and I still see it whenever Bill Gates speaks anywhere, they look at you and I as cattle steers in a giant feed lot where all of your food is pre-mixed, and you’re force-fed, and you get shots with this thing, and that thing, and you get branded and you get pushed to this corral and pushed to that corral.

This is social engineering in their mind. This is just a continuation of what’s been going on for almost a hundred years.

They just don’t care about individual human life.

Listen to the full interview:
HKdsL57SUZo

Patrick Wood does offer some solutions. He founded a website called “Citizens for Free Speech,” as he believes the first thing that has to go to abolish the Constitution of the United States is to abolish the First Amendment, and free speech.

This is already being suppressed by the technocrats and their social media platforms, as even Google Search results now are geared towards their world view only. See:

Google Search is the Greatest Mind Control Brainwashing Tool in the History of Mankind
He believes that face mask and social distancing orders are an attack on the First Amendment, and members of his Citizens for Free Speech organization are wearing small placards that look like this to protest wearing a mask:

https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/CFFS_donate_Mask_header.jpg
“People are coming to us by the thousands every month.”

Mr. Wood’s Technocracy News and Trends website, which also hosts his books, is found here.https://www.technocracy.news/

See Also:

New World Order Continues to be Published: The “Great Reset” – Transhumanism and the 4th Industrial Revolution https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/new-world-order-continues-to-be-published-the-great-reset-transhumanism-and-the-4th-industrial-revolution-2/
Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.

[onawah]

Former FDA Director Gottlieb Now Pfizer Board Member Secures $1.95 BILLION for COVID Vaccine
7.23.20
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/former-fda-director-gottlieb-now-pfizer-board-member-secures-1-95-billion-for-covid-vaccine/
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/07/gottlieb-fda-pfizer-warp-speed-covid-vaccine.jpg

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

"It was announced today (July 22, 2020) that President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” project, which has been pouring in BILLIONS of federal funds for unproven COVID vaccines, most of which are using aborted fetal tissue to culture the viruses, has just allocated another $1.95 BILLION to Pfizer and BioNTech for 100 million doses of their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine which has not even been approved yet.

This reverses a recent trend where the Trump Administration has been hiring Big Pharma executives into government service to develop the COVID vaccines as part of his “Operation Warp Speed.”

This time, a former federal government employee, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former Commissioner of the FDA and now board member of Pfizer, is the recipient of massive government funding to produce a COVID vaccine.

Nothing like keeping it “all in the family” when it comes to Wall Street politicians robbing Americans who are out of work and small business owners who have gone bankrupt, and increasing the wealth of America’s billionaire club which is obviously running the nation now.

The COVID Plandemic has made U.S. Billionaires $584 billion richer, and created instant new pharmaceutical companies making vaccines with millions of dollars of federal funding, even if they have never previously brought a product to market.

It looks like Dr. Scott Gottlieb wanted to get in on the action too, perhaps on his way to the billionaire club as he has been a frequent speaker in the Pharma-funded corporate media stating that the country cannot get back to normal until a vaccine is developed.

All COVID Vaccines Being Fast-tracked
As we have previously reported, vaccines take years to develop, but the new COVID vaccines in the pipeline where hundreds of billions of doses will soon be available within the next couple of months, have all been fast-tracked under “Operation Warp Speed.”

Kyle Blankenship from FiercePharma reports:

The Trump administration’s Warp Speed initiative has placed its biggest bet yet on an accelerated COVID-19 vaccine—and Pfizer and BioNTech are the lucky recipients.

The vaccine partners landed an initial order from the U.S government for 100 million doses of their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine at the eye-popping price tag of $1.95 billion, they said in a joint release Wednesday.

The enormous order is the single largest pledge so far from the Trump administration’s Warp Speed initiative to rapidly develop and distribute effective vaccines for COVID-19.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS’) Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) will collect the first 100 million doses following an FDA approval or emergency authorization, Pfizer said. The government will then have the option of ordering an additional 500 million doses in the future at an undetermined cost.

BARDA and the Trump administration will distribute Pfizer’s vaccine for free to U.S. patients—although taxpayers will ultimately foot the bill.

Is this the End Goal of the Globalists? A Vaccine for Every Person on the Planet?
An mRNA-based vaccine has never before been successfully developed, even after many years of spending billions of dollars to develop one for HIV by the same group of Globalists tied to Bill Gates that is now working on the mRNA COVID vaccine.

Could it be that the entire COVID Plandemic was planned just for the sole purpose to get fast-track approval for such a vaccine?

There are already enough doses being produced, even before the vaccines are approved, to vaccinate the entire global population, and their goal is to make it like the annual flu shot, where you need regular boosters.

If the goal is to actually reduce the world’s population significantly, an untested dangerous vaccine that is injected into the entire population would certainly be the easiest way to do it, and just as Big Pharma currently operates with virtually no legal liability for vaccine injuries or deaths, the COVID vaccine will never be blamed for massive injuries or deaths. They will blame it on the virus, or a supposed mutation of it, or another “deadly virus” which will “coincidentally” appear at the same time.

The Dark History of Vaccines in the U.S.
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/07/1986-The-Act.jpg

A new film released just two weeks ago, 1986 – The Act, covers the sordid history of vaccines in the United States, revealing corruption in the pharmaceutical industry as well as the U.S. Government.

The title of the film refers to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which provided legal immunity to the pharmaceutical industry for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.

Since its inception, the U.S. Government has paid out over $5 billion in damages related to vaccines.

Man and microbe, from Polio to COVID19… a never more relevant forensic examination of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and its consequences.

What happens when an ancient wisdom – a mother’s intuition – is pitted against powerful interests in a race against time?

I am encouraging all of the readership of Health Impact News to please watch this film! It is a 2-hour documentary intertwined with dramatization, and it is only $12.99. It is worth every penny!!

Barbara Loe Fisher, who is the key figure historically in the U.S. fighting for the rights of children and parents when it comes to medical tyranny through vaccines, is one of the featured cast members of the film, with clips from her famous speech given in Washington D.C. in November of 2019, at the The Vaccine Injury Epidemic Event.

I asked her about her speech which was featured in the film and she replied:

There was something I felt deeply that day, looking out at the Washington monument in the distance, with the thousands of parents holding signs with their children, some severely vaccine injured, and the Capitol building behind us.

It was like coming full circle back to where we began in 1982 and I felt sad and outraged at the same time, two emotions that often travel together in our part of the world (the parents of vaccine-injured children).

Here is the entire speech which is less than 20 minutes long:
OAdlnuRjzzU
She is introduced by Hillary Simpson of #crazymothers fame, which is still probably one of the BEST performances ever given on childhood vaccine injuries:
34ZTWvkgiQE
Health Impact News asked Barbara Loe Fisher what she thought about the final cut of the film:

I think Andy did an excellent job making sure the facts presented in the film are backed up with concrete evidence, taking care to accurately tell the history and give it context.

I believe his decision to create a narrative that positions the intuition of mothers and the power of love that parents have for their children against the power of money and political influence of the pharmaceutical and medical trade industry was the right one.

That “follow the money” narrative resonates with a lot of people, including those who have never stopped to think about vaccine safety or why the legal right to make voluntary decisions about vaccination is civil liberties issue.
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/09/book-the-vaccine-court-by-wayne-rohde-large.jpg
Wayne Rohde, author of The Vaccine Court, also appears in the film, and I asked him also what he thought of the final version of the film:

I thought the movie was well done. Better than I expected.

The stories of how the Program came about, the interviews with Barbara Loe Fisher and Mike Hugo and others were priceless. They were there at the beginning.

For new parents who do not understand how Pharma controls Congress, our regulatory agencies, and the corruption of science used to sell the general public on how “safe” vaccines are, is very enlightening and informative.

Job well done to Andy Wakefield and the producer, Lori Gregory.

Watch it online here.

Here are the trailers:
AKUwnRruyeU
zJye0RQWdU8
w1BjvYNHC10
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2015/02/Advocacy-Portal-banner.png
Editors Note: I am not a gambler, but if I were, I would bet that the Big Tech “fact checkers” will blacklist and censor this article as “false news” by stating that Scott Gottlieb is not receiving billions of dollars from this deal, as he is “only” a board member of Pfizer.

So just for the record, I am not stating that Gottlieb personally is receiving all the money in this deal. I am simply stating the facts which are verifiable: that Gottlieb is the former director of the FDA, has publicly stated that the country cannot return to normal without a vaccine, and now sits on the board of Pfizer, who was just awarded BILLIONS to produce an untested COVID vaccine.

This is all verifiable, and not “fake news.” I have added my own commentary which is my right under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, but you are free to draw your own conclusions from these verifiable facts.

See also:

The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Mark of the Beast?
https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/the-satanic-roots-to-modern-medicine-the-mark-of-the-beast/

[onawah]

THE COVID-19 EXIT STRATEGY
(Excellent entry from Del and his guests. If you want to help someone who is still in denial begin to see the enormity of the scam, this is a good one to get them to watch.)
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
7/24/20
207K subscribers

"MN State Senator Under Fire; Covid Collapse in the U.S.?; Have you Herd? A Messy Message from Del; Biostatistician, Knut Wittkowski Has an Exit Strategy."

Q4TztuIZx18

[onawah]

:bump: I actually posted this twice by mistake, but I was thinking at the time about bumping it anyway, so I will just bump it now instead of deleting.
It's a great, succinct package of info that covers so many of the bases, worthy of listening to and sharing.
THE COVID-19 EXIT STRATEGY
7/24/20
207K subscribers

((Excellent entry from Del and his guests, one the Minnesota Physician/Senator, former "MN Doctor of the Year" who is under fire for calling out the lies. Biostatistician, Knut Wittkowski talks about the consequences and much more.
If you want to help someone who is still in denial begin to see the enormity of the scam, this is a good one to get them to watch.)

The HighWire with Del Bigtree
"MN State Senator Under Fire; Covid Collapse in the U.S.?; Have you Herd? A Messy Message from Del; Biostatistician, Knut Wittkowski Has an Exit Strategy."

Q4TztuIZx18[/QUOTE]

[onawah]

The Forces of Evil Are Gathering
32,911 views•Jul 24, 2020
Vernon Coleman
137K subscribers

"International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, explains why and how governments around the world have deliberately over-stated the threat of the coronavirus. And he explains the role of the United Nations and the way education has been changed to promote collectivism. He also shows how the myth of climate change was deliberately created to control people everywhere, and he explains one of the main aims of the coronavirus hoax.
For more unbiased information about other important issues, please visit http://www.vernoncoleman.com
The transcripts of the videos that YouTube banned are also on the website."
PhJL6RDo9XA

( I certainly agree with this wise man.
I think what is being forced upon us now is even more evil than the Nazi agenda that was responsible for WW2.
The first victims to be targeted by the current stage of the NWO agenda are not the Jews, but the elders.
This gentleman demonstrates very well why the wisdom of elders can be worth saving. )

[Ratszinger]

If you stop to think about it for a minute it's rather ingenious what they have done here. They knew the world was a powder keg because mostly they made it that way. They being the elite few orchestrating all the goings on in the world that lead to this turmoil we see, feel and experience each day. What to do when a world of 7 billion people is about to explode on itself? Scare them all into hiding, scare them all about physical contact, scare them with the government, with the air they breath, the things they touch! Make the environment the enemy and they manually shifted the focus of all of society from each other to their own safety.

The protests are almost a gauge that they stuck out allowing it just to test the waters there just to make sure they can control the masses turning this part on, this part off, telling this part no, this part yes and all the while the herd moves right along like good little cattle. Quite remarkable really, especially when you see how easily programmable the majority of folks are by that TV 'tell a vision' contraption that can change people in a matter of no time flat. They cheer when prompted and they scowl when prompted but it never appears to be self control, just the TV telling them how to think, feel and interpret what they see.

[Gwin Ru]

...
How they pulled off the 'pandemic' - an animated film explanation by David Icke (https://www.bitchute.com/video/vPHlo2P3TG22/?fbclid=IwAR3kW6r9kreLs2iGa7KrWNkG0hhemBxJSvs8ZmasXS0WTIyPrY9FUvSG_rs) 16:00

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/channel_images/weBLW8e6mgIB/Opjovi1hOc34OuWjTJfDcHWp_small.jpg (https://www.bitchute.com/channel/davidicke/) DavidIcke (https://www.bitchute.com/channel/davidicke/) DavidIcke (https://www.bitchute.com/profile/TUK19GPsxtRP/)

We release this free of copyright and so please share, download and post wherever you can. Let's make this go globally viral.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vPHlo2P3TG22/


vPHlo2P3TG22

[greybeard]

The Satanic Wars Have Started

International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, describes the world "They" have created, and analyses the laws which have been invented. He explains why and how we are being terrorised by our governments.
For more unbiased information about other important issues, please visit http://www.vernoncoleman.com The transcripts of the videos that YouTube banned are also on the website (click on the 'Health' button and see top of the page).
Thank you for all your encouragement and support.
Please feel free to share this video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6bJ5PxIdl8

[Gwin Ru]

Dr. Fauci Inadvertently Revealed that the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Planned (https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2020/07/26/dr-fauci-inadvertently-revealed-that-the-covid-19-pandemic-was-planned/)

by Edward Hendrie (https://greatmountainpublishing.com/author/edwardmh/)
July 26, 2020 (https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2020/07/26/dr-fauci-inadvertently-revealed-that-the-covid-19-pandemic-was-planned/)

On January 10, 2017, Anthony Fauci predicted in a speech: “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak. … the thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.”

Dr. Fauci gave the speech at the Georgetown Medical Center at an event titled Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration (https://ghss.georgetown.edu/pandemicprep2017/). The conference was organized by the Center for Global Health Science and Security (GHSS) (http://ghss.georgetown.edu/) in partnership with the Harvard Global Health Institute. It is notable how the event was described by Kat Zamban of Georgetown University in the title to her January 12, 2020, article: Global Health Experts Advise Advance Planning for Inevitable Pandemic. (https://gumc.georgetown.edu/gumc-stories/global-health-experts-advise-advance-planning-for-inevitable-pandemic/)Notice that the pandemic the experts would be discussing was an “inevitable pandemic.”

I want you, dear reader, to ponder that statement made by Dr. Fauci in his speech. As you do that, let us put it in context. During the speech, Dr. Fauci bragged about his 32 years of experience studying infectious diseases as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Once he framed his expertise, he pronounced, based on that deep experience, that the Trump administration would be faced with an outbreak of an infectious disease. But let us look closer at that statement. It is very telling. For in that statement, Dr. Fauci has given us a window into his mind and his involvement in the outbreak that he was predicting.

You see, Dr. Fauci did not just guess that there would be an outbreak of an infectious disease, he was emphatic that “there is no question there will be a challenge” of a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease. In addition, Dr. Fauci punctuated his emphatic prediction of a disease outbreak with a closing statement that “the thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.”

So, Fauci emphatically predicts an outbreak of an infectious disease during the upcoming Trump administration. He then gives a timetable. He states that the disease outbreak will happen in the next few years. Sure enough, at the end of 2019, we were greeted with the purported COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. Within months, it allegedly spread throughout the world and into the U.S.

But our analysis does not end there. You see, Dr. Fauci identified the infectious disease that he was predicting as a “surprise outbreak.” Think about it. If the outbreak of the disease is a surprise, by definition, it cannot be foreseen. If a disease cannot be foreseen, it cannot be predicted. How could Dr. Fauci predict something that is a surprise? He cannot.

Dr. Fauci is describing something that he knew would happen. It was only a surprise to the public. Premeditated murder is only a surprise to the murder victim. It is not a surprise to the perpetrator of the murder. The perpetrator of the murder can predict the murder. He can describe it as a surprise murder, but his meaning is that it will be a surprise to the victim. Dr. Fauci was predicting the pandemic with emphatic certainty; there was “no question” in his mind, he was “extraordinarily confident” that there would be a pandemic outbreak within a couple of years. And sure enough, the COVID-19 pandemic happened right on time, exactly when he said it would happen.

But Dr. Fauci said the outbreak would be a surprise. And we all know you cannot predict a surprise. The surprise was on us, not him. If it were a surprise to him, he could not have predicted it. Dr. Fauci is a criminal who has by his slip of the tongue revealed his complicity in a massive worldwide conspiracy.

DNXGAxGJgQI
Dr. Fauci’s Entire Speech
Dr. Fauci makes the statement: “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak” at the 3:20 mark in the video. He then makes his closing remark that “the thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years” at the 39:00 mark in the video. If you would rather not listen to Dr. Fauci’s entire speech, you can cut to the chase in the following edited videos.

bTrx6zkrBQI
puqaaeLnEww

---------------------------------------------------------

The certainty expressed is of the same level as the now famous "China will catch a cold." (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?355-The-Anglo-Saxon-Mission&p=1334416&viewfull=1#post1334416)

[greybeard]

THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING | "2025 is when the whole procedure finishes"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcQEKgxjDLk

[Tintin]

This is too good a story to pass up sharing as an example of yet another possible example of predictive programming. (There's shades of the excellent Scandinavian series Fortitude (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortitude_(TV_series)) in there?)

One wonders whether it was inspired by this scenario (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events/2018_clade_x_exercise/pdfs/Clade-X-executive-summary-document.pdf)

In any case... the coincidences (sic) seem to continue to mount up.

TV drama goes viral: the German-Danish series that foresaw Covid-19

Source: The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/27/tv-drama-goes-viral-the-german-danish-series-that-foresaw-covid-19)

Sløborn, which was was filmed last year, airs on German TV as world fights coronavirus

When a bird-flu type disease originating in pigeons is discovered in northern China, the people living on an idyllic island in the North Sea think nothing of it.

But one day a sailing boat carrying the mummified bodies of a British couple washes up on the island. It subsequently emerges that they have brought the virus with them.

It sounds like a plot inspired by Covid-19, but in fact, Sløborn, a joint German-Danish production for TV, was filmed last year and has been airing on German TV as Europe and the rest of the world reeled from the real pandemic.

The show, whose title is a play on “slow burn”, tells the story of how life on a fictitious island of the same name descends into chaos and destruction as the virus takes hold.

The islanders are advised to wear face masks and practice social distancing. Quarantine rules are introduced, and conspiracy theories abound over the origins of the outbreak.

The show’s creators have described it as “a post-apocalyptic disaster thriller merged into a modern epic” that explores “what happens to modern people when the thin varnish of our civilisation collapses”. It was nearly pulled after bosses at broadcaster ZDF expressed concern it might be too close to reality for viewers to cope with.

“The question was whether we could ask of our audiences to watch it right now,” writer and director Christian Alvart told journalists ahead of broadcast.

Alvart, who consulted virologists and emergency service personnel to find out what Germany’s preparations were in case of a deadly pandemic, said he had been inspired by the thought that disasters “mainly happen elsewhere”, and wondered how it would it be if one was to strike closer to home.

“I had been amazed how we constantly hear about catastrophes in the world through the media but usually our lives just continue as normal,” he said.

When Germany was put into lockdown, the series was in post-production. “It sent shivers down my spine, knowing what we’d filmed in the previous year,” Alvart said.

German TV critics have been gently mocking of the series, which was filmed on the German East Frisian island of Nordeney and the Polish coastal resort, Sopot, in late 2019.

“Not very subtle,” was Der Spiegel’s verdict, in a possible reference one of the symptoms of the disease: the secretion of blood from eye sockets. Süddeutsche Zeitung said the show would have been “a run of the mill horror and catastrophe film” if not for the fact that “one is constantly reminded of the real news of the last few months”. Die Zeit described it as the “reluctant coronavirus series, the fictional accompaniment to the reality of the last few months”.

[Gwin Ru]

CDC Director Robert Redfield: the letter that should have destroyed his career (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/08/05/cdc-director-redfield-letter-should-have-destroyed-his-career/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/author/jonrappoport/)

Aug 5 (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/08/05/cdc-director-redfield-letter-should-have-destroyed-his-career/), 2020

Long before Robert Redfield ascended to the CDC directorship, and also assumed a key post on the White House COVID Task Force, he was a US Army researcher working on an AIDS vaccine.

He ran into a great deal of trouble. His career was almost derailed. The Army finally saved him, through what some investigators assert was a complete whitewash.

On June 7th, 1994, two doctors from Public Citizen, Peter Lu and the relentless consumer advocate, Sidney Wolfe, wrote a long letter (https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0466.041?rgn=main;view=fulltext) to Congressman Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. If Waxman had followed up with decisive action, Redfield might have been finished for good in the field of public health. Here are excerpts from the devastating letter:
“We are writing to request that your Subcommittee hold a hearing, as soon as possible, to investigate charges of grave impropriety committed by U.S. Department of Defense’ AIDS researchers. We have obtained Internal memoranda, not previously made public, from the Department of Defense that allege a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation by Army researchers in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine…The Phase I and Phase II studies in which this alleged misconduct occurred were conducted by researchers at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), led by Lt. Col. Robert Redfield, M.D., Chief of the Department of Retroviral Research, and misleading results from these trials were reported in…the New England Journal of Medicine in June 1991, the Journal AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses in June 1992 and the annual International AIDS Conference in Amsterdam in July 1992. In addition, overstated conclusions have been presented on two occasions at hearings before your Subcommittee.

“Meeting on October 23, 1992 to discuss the allegations by two Air Force research physicians (see below) of scientific misconduct by Dr. Redfield, a subcommittee of the Institutional Review Committee at the Wilford Hall U.S. Air Force Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas reached the following conclusion:


“The committee agreed the information presented by Dr. Redfield seriously threatens his credibility as a researcher and has the potential to negatively impact AIDS research funding for military institutions as a whole. His allegedly unethical behavior creates false hope and could result in premature deployment of the vaccine…


“That meeting was called to review an October 21, 1992 memorandum…from Maj. Craig W. Hendrix, M.D., Director of the HIV Program in the Air Force, and Col. R. Neal Boswell, MD., Associate Chief of the Division of Medicine in the Air Force, to Col. Donald Burke, M.D., Director of the Division of Retrovirology at WRAIR and Dr. Redfield’s immediate supervisor. The memorandum decried ‘The problem of misleading or, possibly, deceptive presentations by Dr. Redfleld, which overstate the GP160 [vaccine] Phase I data…’ and recommended that the following action be taken:



“(1) publicly correct the record in a medium suitable for widespread dissemination to our civilian scientific colleagues;



“(2) censure Dr. Redfield for potential scientific misconduct which should at least include temporarily suspending his involvement on the current immunotherapy protocols; and



“(3) initiate an investigation by a fully independent outside Investigative body…to evaluate the facts of the case and recommend appropriate actions.


“Senior Department of Defense scientists have known of this misconduct since at least October 1992, and Dr. Redfield has acknowledged that his analyses were faulty on at least three occasions to internal Department of Defense audiences (the earliest admission was on August 28, 1992)…”
This is a VERY damning letter. Vaccine fraud.

But Redfield not only avoided professional devastation, he rose through the political hierarchy, eventually becoming CDC director. At the CDC—let’s be frank—lying about vaccines in order to promote and sell them is job number one.

Redfield now also serves on the White House COVID Task Force, an organization dedicated to gaining rapid approval for a pandemic vaccine, come hell or high water.
Charges of extreme scientific fraud on an issue of vaccines THEN; the man occupies two high posts where pushing vaccines is paramount NOW.

But don’t worry, all you pod people wearing masks and waiting for the messianic COVID vaccine. All is well. Sure it is. The vaccine won’t harm or kill you or your children. Resume your pacified slumber.
http://jonrappoport.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/matrixrevealed3.jpg (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed/)

Jon Rappoport

[Gwin Ru]

...
Destroying Western Media's "Swedish Public Health Disaster" Narrative In Two Simple Charts (https://www.zerohedge.com/political/destroying-western-medias-swedish-public-health-disaster-narrative-two-simple-charts)

[...]

In response to Sweden’s massive success rates with its no lockdown policy, the only State that dared stand up to the global banking cartel that was likely behind the global economic lockdown policy, the Western mass media deployed a pre-emptive counterstrike by literally releasing hundreds of articles about the grave “failure” of Sweden’s no lockdown policy and disseminating these articles to millions of websites online. So even though I debunked their false claims already in this article (https://maalamalama.com/wordpress/with-economic-failure-always-comes-war-/30/07/skwealthacademy), since social media has reduced everyone’s attention span to small chunks of a few seconds at a time, with the exception of a handful for every million, I’ve created a couple of charts, drawing data from the sites of the US Centers for Disease Control and Folkhälsomyndigheten, the Public Health Agency of Sweden, to address this problem whereby the false Western mass media narrative about Sweden’s virus response will be destroyed in a glance.



https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/swedenusa1_0.jpg






https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/swedenusa2_0.jpg

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I could post this in half a dozen different threads, some not having anything to do with covid, because it would apply. This story illustrates how easy it is to make a spoof social media account and then use it to support or advocate an agenda. It happens all the time, for good and bad.

But it lends credence to the theory that there's an army of keyboard agent provocateurs out there posting day and night to drive and steer public opinion on everything from policy-making to social issues. Covid is just one of them, and none of us would be surprised if all the disinformation out there about the virus wasn't by design, and spread deliberately by people like this. The real questions are, was she being paid, who was paying her, and how many more are on the payroll?

Scientist says she made up Twitter account for Arizona State Professor who "died" of COVID-19

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/08/beth-ann-mclaughlin.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1

An Arizona State University professor who posted on Twitter for years about social justice issues and recently detailed her fight with COVID-19 was said to have died last week — but she actually never existed.

BethAnn McLaughlin — who announced the made-up professor’s death on July 31 — admitted to The New York Times on Tuesday that she was behind the hoax.

“I take full responsibility for my involvement in creating the @sciencing_bi Twitter account,” she said in a statement through her lawyer. “My actions are inexcusable. I apologize without reservation to all the people I hurt.”

Since 2016, the anonymous account @Sciencing_Bi had posted frequently about sexual harassment and diversity in science, making connections with other academics online. The account claimed to be an anthropology professor who had grown up in Alabama and “fled the south because of their oppression of queer folk,” according to the Times. It also made pointed references to being Native American and began to identify as Hopi earlier this year.

And it was active in the career of McLaughlin, a neuroscientist, even promoting a petition for her to receive tenure Vanderbilt University, which was ultimately unsuccessful.

In April, @Sciencing_Bi announced its coronavirus diagnosis and then documented the symptoms including a loss of language fluency, according to Buzzfeed News. The account blamed ASU for her condition, tweeting in June that the school “forced me to teach 200 person lectures instead of closing” in April.

She also claimed the university cut her salary by 15 percent while she was in the hospital. Then, a seemingly distraught McLaughlin wrote in a lengthy, mournful Twitter thread on Friday that the anonymous professor had died. “Looking at her side of the bed and crying. Just a lot of crying. I literally can do nothing,” she wrote.

The supposed death spurred outrage from others in academia, with a professor saying: “This person was a scientist who got Covid because they’d been forced to teach.”

https://nypost.com/2020/08/04/scientist-says-she-made-up-asu-professor-who-died-of-covid-19/

[onawah]

INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST, SUSAN BRADFORD – WHO’S BEHIND THE DEEP STATE?
8/5/20
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/investigative-journalist-susan-bradford-whos-behind-the-deep-state/

"Susan Bradford joins John Michael Chambers on the new Making Sense of the Madness YouTube channel to discuss her book, which wins my vote for the best book title, ever, ‘UNMASKED: THE CORONAVIRUS STORY: The Nauseating Truth Behind the Global Quest to Bring the World to Heel, Destroy Nationalism and Undermine the Trump Presidency through Fake Scandals, Simulated Pandemics, Junk Science, Political Puppets, Brazen Extortion, and Rapacious Money Grabs.’

Bradford worked at the Atlantic Council of the UK as a senior research fellow, writing and editing publications on foreign policy, in addition to working as a writer, editor and producer for Fox News and Voice of America.

Susan begins by explaining her view that the British Monarchy has been stealthily working to reclaim the United States as a colony in order to consolidate the world’s wealth and power into their own hands. To that end, they’ve been working through the US government and public-private partnerships to create a New World Order, a dictatorship with themselves at the top.

She says that during the Obama Administration, they they made a strong effort to implement their Globalist agenda, of which Obamacare was a part but this had the effect of bankrupting the healthcare industry. In order to recoup their losses, they were hoping to eliminate some of the older people who would be drawing upon public resources and to generate profits through vaccines and they also wanted to launch their contact tracing technologies that they had developed for war.

She says the coronavirus was manufactured by the Pirbright Institute in the UK, which receives funding from the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation, the European Commission, DARPA and the Wellcome Trust. Both the Pirbright Institute and Wellcome are connected to the Rothschilds and they have a long history of developing medicines and chemicals that have been weaponized against the populace, typically to eradicate them during times of war, so that they could either seize natural resources, land, money, etc.

She says the Pirbright Institute acquired the patent for both the coronavirus and the vaccine back in 2018. She notes that last October, the Event 201 pandemic simulation sponsored by Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg and the World Economic Health Forum was held simultaneously with the Military World Games in Wuhan, China, which was sponsored by the International Military Sports Council, which brings together the world’s armed forces and the world’s healthcare providers together, to coordinate their responses to global pandemics and to forge new markets for the pharmaceutical companies.

She says, “Unsurprisingly, the coronavirus was released at the Military World Games and that set off the pandemic around the world.”

George Webb, of course has been asserting the same thing for months and this is what got him de-platformed by YouTube and embroiled in a lawsuit.

Susan Bradford shares many other interesting items from her perspective as a Globalist defector."

VXfIo3sQlPk

[greybeard]

Common Sense Needs To Prevail: How Our Leaders & Media Have Misled The Population

Mike Graham is a British journalist who was the editor of the Scottish Daily Mirror. He is now the Programme Director & mid-morning presenter of the Independent Republic Of Mike Graham on Talk 107.

Before his radio career, Graham was a Fleet Street journalist for the best part of twenty-five years. He covered the Bosnian War in 1992 as a reporter for the Daily Express.

Mike was based in New York City from 1984-1992. Whilst in New York, he ran his own news agency supplying news, features and pictures to international media.

He currently hosts the daily “Independent Republic of Mike Graham” show on talkRADIO, where he questions our leaders and holds the mainstream media to account, in a programme dubbed the “Home of Common Sense”.





https://freedomplatform.tv/mike-graham-common-sense-needs-to-prevail-how-our-leaders-media-have-misled-the-population/

[greybeard]

Coronavirus: How we have all been betrayed


International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, claims that we have all been betrayed by the medical establishments which have allowed governments to abandon patients not suffering from the coronavirus.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdyjcNRVmdU&t=34s

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

If this is true it's unreal. Can any Aussies confirm?

Madness in Melbourne

– August 4, 2020

"Melbourne has become a living hell, not because of the virus (which is still mild) but because of the unleashing of a hellish police state."

Only one person per household, per day, can leave the house (including for groceries). Can't go more than 3 miles from your home. The army is on the streets fining/arresting people.

- Police may now enter anyone's home without a warrant.

- Curfew 8:00pm.

- $1,652 fine if outside without "a valid reason" - an amount being raised by the day

- Can't visit any family or friends. $200 fine for no mask (mandatory masks at all times).

- Can only exercise once per day, for up to 1 hour.

- Only one person per household, per day, can leave the house (including for groceries).

- Can't go more than 3 miles from your home.

- Weddings are illegal. No gatherings of any size.

- Army is on the streets fining/arresting people.

- "Since March 21, a total of 193,740 spot checks have been conducted by police across Victoria."

- Protests/activism is illegal; people have already been arrested for peaceful gatherings.

- Media is EXTREMELY biased, calls protesters "right-wing conspiracy nutjobs" and won't allow discussion of whether these lockdowns are right or not.

- Several thousand people were placed under house arrest and unable to leave for ANY reason, with food rations delivered by the army, leading to appalling levels of personal trauma.

- Australia won't release how many fines they've given out, but an ABC news report says it's over $5.2 million so far.

- Streets of Melbourne are empty, even in a city of 5 million+ people. People are HATEFUL to each other, everyone is cannibalizing their neighbours (calling police to report any little infraction of the rules and turning on each other like some socialist hellhole).

- Billboards outside on the street that say in capital letters: "WHAT ARE YOU DOING? STAY HOME." They feel extremely oppressive like we're being yelled at by a very oppressive government.

- The Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews shows complete and utter disdain for us, constantly blaming us. He's blamed children (yes, really) for not taking this seriously enough. Every chance he gets, he tells us it's OUR fault the virus is spreading (even though that's what viruses do - they spread).

- It's not just the Victorian Premier - the Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, left, is just as terrible. He's encouraged all of this, and he was responsible for the first lockdown.

- 1984 dystopian language: billboards everywhere saying "Staying apart keeps us together."

- Have they gone mad? There's probably more but at this point, I honestly lost track of all the insanity that's happened. All because 147 people died in the state of Victoria (total population is 6.359 million), almost all of the deaths are over 70 with comorbidities, same as everywhere else in the world.

- This is lockdown ideology at work. It is a tyranny without limit, at the expense of all human dignity, decency, and rights. The politicians make a desert and call it health.

Article: https://www.aier.org/article/madness-in-melbourne/

[wondering]

On the edge of my seat, so to speak, waiting to find out if Star Mariner’s post is true....🤯🤯🤯 Diane

[woodshreder]

A friend of mine is a Nurse in Melbourne and she sadly just confirmed this is true.

[Gemma13]

Department of Health and Human Services website with list of Stage 4 restrictions:

https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/stage-4-restrictions-covid-19#what-is-changing-under-stage-4-restrictions

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

If it's true that only "147 people have died in the state of Victoria (total population is 6.359 million), and almost all of the deaths are over 70 with comorbidities," then these measures are ridiculously draconian.

[onawah]

If Bill Gates Was President..
9,257 views•Aug 7, 2020
1.5K
Spiro Skouras
107K subscribers

"Bill Gates was recently asked by Yahoo Business what he would do if he were president of the United States. In this interview James Corbett of CorbettReport.com joins Spiro to ask the very same question, only to arrive at a much different conclusion.

James Corbett and Spiro also analyze the events that have led up to todays current situation regarding the virus and the response to it. From the beginning of this crisis, we have all asked... Will the cure be worse than the problem. It seems evident at this point, that the answer to that question is a resounding yes!

Spiro and Corbett delve deep into the problem reaction solution perspective known as the Hegelian Dialectic we are seeing play out in this manufactured crisis. The end game is clear. The only question is... Will the people accept what the social engineers have in store for humanity? "
OX_jYEI6Z3Q

UPDATE
Reviewed by Alexandra Bruce: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/if-bill-gates-were-president/

"Wow, Spiro Skouras is joined by James Corbett to discuss what we can do about this Globalist juggernaut led by Bill Gates, to vaccinate “the entire Global population”, as he says.

***

Spiro: On the exact same day as Event 201, the pandemic simulation of the global coronavirus outbreak, which was hosted by Johns Hopkins, in partnership with Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, the World Military Games were holding their opening ceremonies, on the exact same day.

Right before the coronavirus outbreak, 10,000 military athletes – not including the support personnel – from 110 different nations around the world, all in Wuhan China, which we are all led to believe is Ground Zero of this outbreak. What are the chances of all of this? And what is your take on this, in general?

James: Well, let’s look at the generation-defining Black Ops of the past century, like for example JFK or 9/11. In operations like that, if there’s anything that we’ve learned over the years, it’s that there’s going to be 18 different cookie crumb trails embedded in these stories, so that there’s something crazy over here that’ll capture your attention – there’s something crazy over there that’ll capture your attention – that never, never will be resolved, because it’s all in the past.

Now, and there’s no way to prove anything, so people will fight and ultimately, entire warring, internecine classes of doctrines about JFK and 9/11 and whatever arise, and “You don’t agree with what I think about this particular thing.”

If we’ve learned anything, it’s that that’s actually by design, because of course, if you do want a successful Black Op to go ahead, you will have to implant a lot of crazy trails and stories and things that seem to connect in weird ways and “What the Hell is that about?” mysteries embedded in there, that of course, are fascinating and will attract the conspiracy theorists (uh, the realists) who actually want to look into what happened.

I think we’re going to have to assume that that is what is happening, with regards to this. So yes, there are all sorts of crazy things like Event 201, like the Wuhan games, like that bizarre whatever was happening around Fort Detrick last year, with the outbreak of this, and then there was the vaping thing – they were trying to blame it on…there were clusters of these these pneumonia-like illnesses that were happening. And I mean, there’s so many different things that we could look at.

And again yes, I don’t have the definitive, “Here is exactly what happened”, and I don’t think anyone will ever come to that, at this point, unless we get the signed, sealed, delivered confession from one of the insiders of the plot. Unlikely.

But what we do know and what we can absolutely prove is, all of that institutional framework and all of the preparation, all of the planning that, for decades that has gone into this very scenario; the pandemic outbreak scenario most obviously announced by the front man for this agenda right now, Bill Gates back in 2015, when he started doing the media rounds warning about the next pandemic.

So, that kind of framework. And that preparation has been laid – and I talked about this 12 years ago, in a podcast I did on Medical Martial Law, which I updated this year, when this all started rolling out, where I go through all of the the types of planning and the documentation and the model State Emergency Health Preparedness Act, that was created back around 9/11 and that was rolled out, in state after state…that has basically brought us to this point, that I can point to and I can say, “Look!”

Clearly, whether spontaneous – maybe it really did come from bat soup. It doesn’t actually matter, insofar as the way that they have responded to it is exactly what they they’ve been lusting after.

So, I think at some point, obviously the decision was made, “Okay, this is the one we’re going to use; we’re going to jump on this, let’s go for it.” But whether or not that was designed, whether it escaped, whether it was completely natural, I don’t know…

And who gets to decide that and what are their financial ties? And what does it mean that something like the Bill and Melinda ates Foundation, which is, by the way also a foundation trust, which is invested in pharmaceutical manufacturers and others that have financial ties to what happens here.

What does it mean, that they’re donating hundreds of millions of dollars to the World Health Organization, the second biggest donor to the World Health Organization, right behind the United States? Which, if they actually do withdraw their funding next year, as they’re threatening to do, would make the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation the biggest contributor to the World Health Organization.

That is something that is a very, very big conflict of interest, that to be fair, was almost sort of broached in a recent interview with Bill Gates. The interviewer actually did push a little bit saying, ‘Well, don’t aren’t you invested in certain some of the companies that will benefit from these vaccines and of course he completely danced around that question.

But could you imagine a world in which the press actually held Gates’ feet to the fire on that issue? Because, that would start to tease out some of these the implications of what you’re talking about there. For example, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation being one of the largest contributors to the World Health Organization."

[leavesoftrees]

If it's true that only "147 people have died in the state of Victoria (total population is 6.359 million), and almost all of the deaths are over 70 with comorbidities," then these measures are ridiculously draconian.

It is now about 193 deaths in Victoria with approx 400 new cases a day. Most of the deaths are in nursing homes of people who are 80+

The Premier has declared a state of disaster which gives him and his government unprecedented powers

Melbourne is now a gulag with civil liberties non existent. Police scan registration plates and question anyone who is more than 5 kms from the residence where the car is registered. If you are out without a reasonable reason $1675 fine

Most industries have been shut down. Anyone working has to carry a permit authorising them to work

Surprisingly the majority of people think that Daniel Andrews is doing a great job

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I liked this, I liked this a lot.

https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange/status/1291374080197906434

[greybeard]

Fake Tests = Fake Cases = Fake Reasons For Lockdowns – Mass Murder Of The Elderly – David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast (Please share – BANNED BY TWITTER)


https://davidicke.com/2020/08/06/fake-tests-fake-cases-fake-lockdowns-mass-murder-of-the-elderly-david-icke-dot-connector-videocast-please-share-to-beat-censorship/

This is on David Ickes web site if there are any challenges viewing..
As usual the video is full of facts -- I wish he was wrong but unfortunately it seems to be going in the direction he is pointing to.
Chris

[Gwin Ru]

EXPOSED: World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions for imposing extreme lockdown, reveals Belarus president (https://greatgameindia.com/belarus-world-bank-coronavirus-conditions/)

greatgameindia.com (https://greatgameindia.com/belarus-world-bank-coronavirus-conditions/)
Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:30 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/579055/large/2206556_389380969.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/579055/full/2206556_389380969.jpg)
Aleksandr Lukashenko


Huge foreign loans are given to sovereign nations by the World Bank, IMF and the likes. But the conditions that come attached to these loans are seldom told by governments to their citizens. A recent case in Belarus has exposed the conditions laid by these agencies for loans being provided for COVID-19. The President of Belarus has exposed that the World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions (https://greatgameindia.com/belarus-world-bank-coronavirus-conditions/) for imposing extreme lockdown measures, to model their coronavirus response on that of Italy and even changes in the economic policies which he refused as being "unacceptable".

Additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for Belarus, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko said when speaking about external lending during a meeting to discuss support measures for the real economic sector on the part of the banking system, reported (https://eng.belta.by/president/view/belarus-president-unwilling-to-accept-additional-terms-to-get-foreign-loans-131164-2020/) Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA.

Aleksandr Lukashenko asked the participants of the meeting how things were with the provision of foreign credit assistance to Belarus. "What are our partners' requirements? It was announced that they can provide Belarus with $940 million in so-called rapid financing. How are things here?" the head of state inquired.

At the same time, he stressed that additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for the country.

"We hear the demands, for example, to model our coronavirus response on that of Italy. I do not want to see the Italian situation to repeat in Belarus. We have our own country and our own situation," the president said.

According to the president, the World Bank has showed interest in Belarus' coronavirus response practices.

"It is ready to fund us ten times more than it offered initially as a token of commendation for our efficient fight against this virus. The World Bank has even asked the Healthcare Ministry to share the experience. Meanwhile, the IMF continues to demand from us quarantine measures, isolation, a curfew. This is nonsense. We will not dance to anyone's tune," said the president.

Belarus is one of the only European countries that has not implemented strict coronavirus containment measures. The no-restriction situation is such that even the non-essential services remain open. The football league of Belarus is still being played. The only restriction kind-of step that Belarus took till now is that the school holidays have been extended.

Lukashenko is of the opinion that a complete lockdown was completely unnecessary. Similar, views have been expressed by many renowned scientists as well. Recently, an Indian doctor has debunked the official narrative on Coronavirus (https://greatgameindia.com/indian-doctor-debunks-coronavirus/). He emphasizes that 'stress affects health' and said that fear isn't necessary because eventually people will develop natural immunity to this virus. He is one of the few people to advocate the opinion that life must continue uninterrupted.

The President of Belarus is not the first one to have exposed the pressure exerted by global agencies amidst the coronavirus crisis to further their agenda. Earlier, in a shocking development the President of Madagascar made a sensational claim that the WHO offered him $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure (https://greatgameindia.com/who-offered-20m-bribe-to-poison-covid-19-cure-madagascar-president/) called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia.

The Tanzanian President kicked out WHO from the country (https://greatgameindia.com/tanzania-kicks-out-who-after-goat-papaya-samples-came-covid-19-positive/) after Goat and Papaya samples came COVID-19 positive. Days after the Tanzanian move, Burundi also kicked out WHO Coronavirus Team (https://greatgameindia.com/burundi-kicks-out-who-coronavirus-team/) from the country for interference in internal matters.

It was also revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program (https://greatgameindia.com/bill-gates-offered-10-million-bribe-for-forced-vaccination-in-nigeria/) in Nigeria. After which, an Italian politician demanded the arrest of Bill Gates (https://greatgameindia.com/italian-politician-demand-bill-gates-arrest-for-crimes-against-humanity/) in the Italian parliament. She also exposed Bill Gates' agenda in India (https://greatgameindia.com/bill-gates-agenda-in-india-exposed-by-robert-kennedy-jr/) and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.

--------------------------------------------------

Big global $$ with big global organizations all pushing irrational measures to implement their agenda...

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

@12 seconds
"'sovereign citizens' - whatever that might mean". If he doesn't know what that means, he should not be wearing a uniform. Absolute disgrace.

One could even define this as 'police state'.

Melbourne Police Salivate: We will smash your windows, we will arrest you, we will detain you.

c-rCQi7jOEI

[Kryztian]

Kissinger: Failure to establish post-COVID new world order ‘could set the world on fire’
The famous presidential foreign policy adviser demanded 'a global collaborative vision and program' and adherence to the 'principles of the liberal world order.'
Tue Apr 7, 2020 - 11:57 am EST

https://i.imgur.com/dmN7Oul.jpg?1

NEW YORK, April 6, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) ― A Nobel-winning American foreign policy expert has warned that the United States will have to join a global program to overcome the damage wrought by the coronavirus pandemic.

Henry Kissinger, 96, was the national security adviser and secretary of state for Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. For the rest of his long career, he has served as an adviser to political and business leaders. The Wall Street Journal published the iconic political thinker’s response to the international health emergency on Friday, April 6.

Kissinger stated that “the world will never be the same after the coronavirus” and that the United States government will have to sustain “the public trust.

“In a divided country, efficient and farsighted government is necessary to overcome obstacles unprecedented in magnitude and global scope,” he wrote.

“Sustaining the public trust is crucial to social solidarity, to the relation of societies with each other, and to international peace and stability.”

The former official stated that the current U.S. administration has done “a solid job in avoiding immediate catastrophe” but that its “ultimate test” is stopping the virus and maintaining “public confidence in Americans’ ability to govern themselves.”

At the same time, Kissinger called for the government to launch “a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.”

Coping effectively with the political and societal damage will take international collaboration, he warned.

“Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders,” he wrote.

“While the assault on human health will — hopefully — be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations,” he continued.

“No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.”

However, Kissinger hinted at American leadership in this global endeavor by citing both the Marshall Plan, which helped to rebuild western Europe after its devastating by World War II, and the Manhattan Project, which beat Nazi Germany in the race to produce the first nuclear weapons.

“Drawing lessons from the development of the Marshall Plan and the Manhattan Project, the U.S. is obliged to undertake a major effort in three domains,” Kissinger wrote.

“First, shore up global resilience to infectious disease,” he continued.

“We need to develop new techniques and technologies for infection control and commensurate vaccines across large populations. Cities, states and regions must consistently prepare to protect their people from pandemics through stockpiling, cooperative planning and exploration at the frontiers of science.”

Kissinger next directed the USA to “strive to heal the wounds to the world economy” which he noted are “unlike anything ever known in history.”

“Programs should also seek to ameliorate the effects of impending chaos on the world’s most vulnerable populations,” he added.

Finally, the foreign policy adviser implored the USA not to abandon “the principles of the liberal world order,” saying that “prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.”

“The founding legend of modern government is a walled city protected by powerful rulers, sometimes despotic, other times benevolent, yet always strong enough to protect the people from an external enemy,” Kissinger wrote.

“Enlightenment thinkers reframed this concept, arguing that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people: security, order, economic well-being, and justice,” he continued

“The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.”

Kissinger believes that “the world’s democracies need to defend and sustain their Enlightenment values.”

“A global retreat from balancing power with legitimacy will cause the social contract to disintegrate both domestically and internationally,” he stated.

“Yet this millennial issue of legitimacy and power cannot be settled simultaneously with the effort to overcome the Covid-19 plague. Restraint is necessary on all sides — in both domestic politics and international diplomacy.”

Kissenger warned that failure either to conquer the coronavirus or to build the post-coronavirus world order might lead to global catastrophe.

“The historic challenge for leaders is to manage the crisis while building the future,” he concluded.

“Failure could set the world on fire.”

[Kryztian]

Bill Gates claims pandemic's 'misery' will 'happen regularly' if climate change is not stopped
Microsoft co-founder says climate change death toll will match that of COVID-19 in 40 years.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-gates-coronavirus-pandemic-climate-change

Billionaire Bill Gates wants the United States to treat climate change with the "same sense of urgency" with which it has responded to COVID-19, arguing that the impacts of the former will be much worse without corrective action.

"If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change will inflict, look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a much longer period of time," the Microsoft co-founder wrote on his blog Tuesday.

"The loss of life and economic misery caused by this pandemic are on par with what will happen regularly if we do not eliminate the world’s carbon emissions."

Gates estimated that the death toll from climate change would match that of the pandemic by 2060, and exceed it fivefold by 2100. The economic impact of climate change over the next two decades, he added, could be "as bad as having a COVID-sized pandemic every ten years."

BILL GATES SAYS CORONAVIRUS VACCINE COULD REQUIRE MULTIPLE DOSES

Early in the pandemic, some drew comparisons between the virus and climate change, and credited economic shutdowns with reducing carbon emissions. Gates acknowledged this effect, but said such temporary restrictions aren't nearly enough to address rising emissions.

“What’s remarkable is not how much emissions will go down because of the pandemic, but how little," he said, pointing to a July report estimating the cost of emissions reductions.

"Has closing off major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything close to $100 per ton?" Gates asked. "No. In the United States, according to data from the Rhodium Group, it comes to between $3,200 and $5,400 per ton. In the European Union, it’s roughly the same amount. In other words, the shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times the $100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price."

At the end of his blog post, Gates called for drastic change and noted that flying or driving less wasn't going to cut it.

"So just as we need new tests, treatments, and vaccines for the novel coronavirus, we need new tools for fighting climate change: zero-carbon ways to produce electricity, make things, grow food, keep our buildings cool and warm, and move people and goods around the world," he said.

BILL GATES PARTLY BLAMES FACEBOOK, TWITTER FOR CORONAVIRUS SPREAD

"And we need new seeds and other innovations to help the world’s poorest people — many of whom are smallholder farmers — adapt to a less predictable climate."

Meanwhile, a Duke University professor told lawmakers Wednesday that the U.S. could prevent 4.5 million premature deaths if it worked towards to keep temperature increases below two degrees Celsius.

[pueblo]

The agenda comes more sharply into focus daily.

I am currently in Spain returning home to Ireland soon. By law when arriving in Ireland all passengers must fill out a 'Passenger Locator Form', where you enter the details of where you will be self isolating for, for 2 weeks on your return.

This is very soon to be replaced by an "Electronic Passenger Locator Form' which is basically an app they can use to check where you are at all times as well as spam you fear based 'public health warnings'.

Under no circumstances will I put this crap on my phone. It's push back time.



New call centre to track passengers arriving at the State's ports and airports
Online passenger locator form being developed by HSE due to launch this month

A new call centre to track passengers arriving into Ireland from non-green list countries will begin operations next Monday.

The call centre has been set up by DAA, but its operations will be contracted to an outside company, specifically to tackle the very low rate of follow-up by State authorities on passengers arriving into Ireland who are required to quarantine for 14 days.

Until now it has been the Department of Justice which has been responsible for follow-up calls to locate incoming passengers.

However, only 7 per cent of passengers arriving from non-green list countries were contacted, and only half of those answered the calls.

The low rate of contacting incoming passengers was described by Social Democrats co-leader Róisín Shortall as a weakness in Government plans to tackle Covid-19 in Ireland.

He confirmed the e-form for locating passengers will include a “text-messaging facility with the capability to issue daily reminders and public health information to persons required to restrict their movement”.

The locator office will also be in a position to check that passengers are where they claimed they would be on the form they supplied upon arrival into Ireland.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/new-call-centre-to-track-passengers-arriving-at-the-state-s-ports-and-airports-1.4325977

[Gwin Ru]

There you go... plain as day; what "they" want, what "they" believe:

Professor of Bioethics: 'Induce compliance from Covid-19 defectors by subjecting them to moral enhancement via water supply' (https://www.sott.net/article/439632-Professor-of-Bioethics-Induce-compliance-from-Covid-19-defectors-by-subjecting-them-to-moral-enhancement-via-water-supply)

Parker Crutchfield
The Conversation (https://theconversation.com/morality-pills-may-be-the-uss-best-shot-at-ending-the-coronavirus-pandemic-according-to-one-ethicist-142601#comments-container)
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:37 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/579309/large/c445d4f4c2dee56f9a00cacacefc48.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/579309/full/c445d4f4c2dee56f9a00cacacefc48.jpg)
People in California protested stay-at-home orders in May – prioritizing the personal over the collective. Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images (https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/hundreds-of-people-gather-to-protest-the-stay-at-home-news-photo/1211479844)

A US bioethicist proposes that 'Covid-19 defectors be covertly morally-enhanced.'

COVID-19 is a collective risk. It threatens everyone, and we all must cooperate to lower the chance that the coronavirus harms any one individual. Among other things, that means keeping safe social distances and wearing masks (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html). But many people choose not to do these things (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/23/most-americans-say-they-regularly-wore-a-mask-in-stores-in-the-past-month-fewer-see-others-doing-it/), making spread of infection more likely.
SOTT Comment (https://www.sott.net/article/439632-Professor-of-Bioethics-Induce-compliance-from-Covid-19-defectors-by-subjecting-them-to-moral-enhancement-via-water-supply): Social distancing and wearing facemasks have no (https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses) proven impact (https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses) on the reduction of viral transmission, particularly for coronaviruses and other highly contagious viruses that cause the common cold and influenza-like illnesses.
When someone chooses not to follow public health guidelines around the coronavirus, they're defecting from the public good. It's the moral equivalent of the tragedy of the commons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons#:%7E:text=The%20tragedy%20of%20the%20commons,resource%20through%20their%20col lective%20action.): If everyone shares the same pasture for their individual flocks, some people are going to graze their animals longer, or let them eat more than their fair share, ruining the commons in the process. Selfish and self-defeating behavior undermines the pursuit of something from which everyone can benefit.
SOTT Comment: Indeed, and what could be more selfish and self-defeating than trashing people's lives to pursue an aim that is impossible to achieve?
Democratically enacted enforceable rules - mandating things like mask wearing and social distancing - might work, if defectors could be coerced into adhering to them. But not all states have opted to pass them (https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2020/states-mask-mandates-coronavirus.html) or to enforce the rules (https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2020/05/15/several-michigan-sheriffs-say-they-wont-enforce-parts-of-executive-orders/) that are in place.
SOTT Comment: Not a single 'rule', 'law' or 'recommendation' on Covid-19 was democratically enacted. All of it is constitutionally illegal.
My research in bioethics (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=oEHIR14AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao) focuses on questions like how to induce those who are noncooperative to get on board with doing what's best for the public good. To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior. Could a psychoactive pill be the solution to the pandemic?
SOTT Comment: Ironically, that's most likely what the 'gain-of-function' SARS-Cov-2 virus was meant to be; a virus that would 'improve' the population's DNA (https://www.sott.net/article/437083-Compelling-Evidence-That-SARS-CoV-2-Was-Man-Made) by making people more compliant. But it apparently backfired, causing the system managers to freak out and irrationally 'lock it all down'.
It's a far-out proposal that's bound to be controversial (https://slate.com/technology/2017/03/why-we-are-so-alarmed-by-the-idea-of-a-moral-enhancement-pill.html), but one I believe is worth at least considering, given the importance of social cooperation in the struggle to get COVID-19 under control.

Public goods games show scale of the problem
Evidence from experimental economics shows that defections are common to situations in which people face collective risks. Economists use public goods games (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_goods_game#:%7E:text=The%20public%20goods%20game%20is,put%20into%20a%20public%20pot.) to measure how people behave in various scenarios to lower collective risks such as from climate change or a pandemic and to prevent the loss of public and private goods.

The evidence from these experiments is no cause for optimism. Usually everyone loses (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504902103) because people won't cooperate. This research suggests it's not surprising people aren't wearing masks or social distancing - lots of people defect from groups when facing a collective risk. By the same token, I'd expect that, as a group, we will fail at addressing the collective risk of COVID-19, because groups usually fail. For more than 150,000 Americans so far (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html), this has meant losing everything there is to lose.

But don't abandon all hope. In some of these experiments, the groups win and successfully prevent the losses associated with the collective risk. What makes winning more likely? Things like keeping a running tally of what others are contributing, observing others' behaviors (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50964-w), communication and coordination (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102493108) before and during play, and democratic implementation of an enforceable rule requiring contributions (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13530).
SOTT Comment: A social credit system, in other words, requiring maximal, and ideally total, compliance - even in the face of later developments indicating that the system's orthodoxies are objectively false.
For those of us in the United States, these conditions are out of reach when it comes to COVID-19. You can't know what others are contributing to the fight against the coronavirus, especially if you socially distance yourself. It's impossible to keep a running tally of what the other 328 million people in the U.S. are doing. And communication and coordination are not feasible outside of your own small group.
SOTT Comment: Oh the NSA and assorted intel agencies would beg to differ. They have a very clear idea of what 'the mass mind' is up to - hence their daily fine-tuning of mass programming.
Even if these factors were achievable, they still require the very cooperative behavior that's in short supply. The scale of the pandemic is simply too great for any of this to be possible.

Promoting cooperation with moral enhancement
It seems that the U.S. is not currently equipped to cooperatively lower the risk confronting us. Many are instead pinning their hopes on the rapid development and distribution of an enhancement to the immune system - a vaccine.

But I believe society may be better off, both in the short term as well as the long, by boosting not the body's ability to fight off disease but the brain's ability to cooperate with others. What if researchers developed and delivered a moral enhancer rather than an immunity enhancer?

Moral enhancement is the use of substances to make you more moral. The psychoactive substances act on your ability to reason about what the right thing to do is, or your ability to be empathetic or altruistic or cooperative.

For example, oxytocin, the chemical that, among other things, can induce labor or increase the bond between mother and child, may cause a person to be more empathetic and altruistic (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189047), more giving and generous (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001128). The same goes for psilocybin (https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx047), the active component of "magic mushrooms." These substances have been shown to lower aggressive behavior in those with antisocial personality disorder (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0139-y) and to improve the ability of sociopaths to recognize emotion in others (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.07.483).

These substances interact directly with the psychological underpinnings of moral behavior; others that make you more rational could also help. Then, perhaps, the people who choose to go maskless or flout social distancing guidelines would better understand that everyone, including them, is better off when they contribute, and rationalize that the best thing to do is cooperate.

Moral enhancement as an alternative to vaccines
There are of course pitfalls to moral enhancement.

One is that the science isn't developed enough. For example, while oxytocin may cause some people to be more pro-social, it also appears to encourage ethnocentrism (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015316108), and so is probably a bad candidate for a widely distributed moral enhancement. But this doesn't mean that a morality pill is impossible. The solution to the underdeveloped science isn't to quit on it, but to direct resources to related research in neuroscience, psychology or one of the behavioral sciences.
SOTT Comment: 'Science can't do this, but we can make science do this for us!'
Another challenge is that the defectors who need moral enhancement are also the least likely to sign up for it. As some have argued, a solution would be to make moral enhancement compulsory (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/unfit-for-the-future-9780198707929) or administer it secretly, perhaps via the water supply (https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12496). These actions require weighing other values. Does the good of covertly dosing the public with a drug that would change people's behavior outweigh individuals' autonomy to choose whether to participate? Does the good associated with wearing a mask outweigh an individual's autonomy to not wear one?

The scenario in which the government forces an immunity booster upon everyone is plausible. And the military has been forcing enhancements like vaccines or "uppers" upon soldiers (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/more-than-human-the-ethics-of-biologically-enhancing-soldiers/253217/) for a long time. The scenario in which the government forces a morality booster upon everyone is far-fetched. But a strategy like this one could be a way out of this pandemic, a future outbreak or the suffering associated with climate change. That's why we should be thinking of it now.
About the author

Parker Crutchfield is Associate Professor of Medical Ethics, Humanities and Law, Western Michigan University


SOTT Comment: And there you have it. This 'top thinker' from among their 'side' or 'type' just articulated exactly what is going on here. His genius plan may not literally be in effect ('morality pills'), but elements of it certainly are, and, in toto, it is metaphorically or energetically in effect - and has been for some time, i.e. since pre-Covid-19. One thing that comes to mind is the fluoridation of the water supply, something that has been implemented globally, to varying degrees, since WW2.

How does someone in his position - someone who we have no reason to doubt ostensibly lives 'a normal life' and who 'means well' - come up with such a psychopathic, anti-human scheme?

Our best guess is that, like the scientists working for the secret consortium who took a coronavirus and genetically tweaked it to 'improve human DNA' then introduced it to the general population by using US soldiers as guinea pigs, his own DNA is 'antenna-aligned' to the same or similar 'sources of inspiration' in the Information Field. He's able to conceive 'solutions' like he proposes above because that's the sort of thing 'like-minded' people are actively conceiving and doing all the time.

At each stage, when things backfire, they double-down and intensify their efforts to 'make better people, for a better world', completely oblivious to their role in producing increasing numbers of brain-disordered and character-disturbed people.


Related:


BRAVE NEW WORLD: Health 'Experts' Propose Spiking Water Supply with Lithium to Stop COVID-19 Suicides (https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/77715/brave-new-world-health-experts-propose-spiking-water-supply-with-lithium-to-stop-covid19.html)

[Goba]

its actually more about Covid and Australia

eEoJibTMg6o

[Goba]

Kissinger: Failure to establish post-COVID new world order ‘could set the world on fire’

I just had a bad case of Mandela-Effect, I was certain this piece of human excrement had died already!

[Gwin Ru]

Illuminati Vowed in 1969: "Travel Will Be More Difficult" (https://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_vowed_in_1969_trave.html)

By Henry Makow
August 15, 2020


https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/960x0.jpg

Wake up, folks. The coronavirus is a pretext for the radical undemocratic reorganization of society.


1969:
" Travel ... would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID... later on, some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual."
Updated from Nov 12, 2010
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

Like sheep, humanity had better adjust to constant harassment as long as it tolerates Illuminati control of all important government and social institutions.

On March 20, 1969, Rockefeller Insider (http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/972.html) Dr. Richard Day (1905-1989) gave a speech to the Pittsburgh division of the American Medical Association in which he predicted:
(http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html)
" Travel ... would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID... later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual." (Tape two)
Although prohibited, Dr. Lawrence Dunegan made notes and related the contents of the speech to Randy Engel who made them available on tape. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfnQpHwY8QA)

Dr. Dunegan reveals not just "WHAT" is intended for America and all people in the world, but "HOW" the controllers intend to carry out their plan.


https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/r-day.jpg
Dr. Day said -- "Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now . . ."


"Some of you will think I'm talking about Communism. Well, what I'm talking about is much bigger than Communism!" "Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people; and second, is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it."
He covers topics such as:


People will have to get used to change - everything will change, constantly



The REAL and the "STATED" goals



Population Control



Permission to have babies



Redirecting the purpose of sex - sex without reproduction and reproduction without sex



Sex education as a tool of World Government



Encouraging homosexuality... Sex, anything goes



Euthanasia and the "Demise Pill"



Limiting access to affordable medical care makes eliminating the elderly easier



Planning the control over medicine



Elimination of private doctors



New Difficult to diagnose and untreatable diseases



Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control.



Inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination



Education as a tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and pushing evolution



and MUCH, MUCH MORE

The complete transcript of these tapes are available here. (http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians1.htm)

DENIAL
As long as the masses refuse to acknowledge the Illuminati conspiracy, they will continue to be complicit in their own destruction.

For the last six months (in 2010), we have been bombarded with propaganda about the Swine Flu. Millions have been vaccinated. Billions of profits have been made. These vaccines might have been harmless. Who knows about the next? What we do know is that, generally speaking, Swine Flu proved to be less dangerous than seasonal flu.

Then, recently for over a week, we were bombarded with hysteria about weather change (aka "climate change.") The Club of Rome concocted this bogeyman back in the 1980s.

We must regard official society as a brainwashing chamber where we are being subjected to trauma-based mind control. Other traumatic events from the last decade include 9-11, the Tsunami, Hurricane Katerina, the great Northeastern power black-outs, the financial meltdown, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It's been a good decade for the Illuminati. Society is far more fearful and pessimistic, far more willing to accept totalitarian control.

THE KEY TO OUR EXASPERATION
In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the author writes that their goal is:
"To wear everyone out by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, until the Gentiles sees no other way of escape except by appeal to our money and our power." (Protocol 10)

"We will so wear out and exhaust the Gentiles by all this that they will be compelled to offer us an international authority, which by its position will enable us to absorb without disturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form a super-government." (Protocol 5)
Harold Rosenthal who was a member of this cabal boasted that they even implanted a "guilt complex" over the holocaust and anti-Semitism that prevents society from addressing the threat.

Through control of banking, they acquired a total monopoly of
"the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media...we took over the publication of all school materials... Even your music! We censor the songs released for publication long before they reach the publishers...we will have complete control of your thinking."

We "have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eyes fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We, Jews, toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse."
It would be great if the problem could be confined to "Jews" but literally everyone who advances the New World Order agenda wittingly or unwittingly is implicated, and that is, millions of people, i.e. the "Establishment."

SOCIETY OF SHILLS
The Illuminati central banking cartel controls government credit, media, banking, corporations, education, professional associations, justice, military ..you name it. They use Freemasonry as their instrument. Recently, I posted an article about how they control the US Black community (https://www.henrymakow.com/the_boule_-_the_black_skull_an.html) using the Masonic "Boule." The same principle applies everywhere.

Society operates on two rails. The formal--the image of a democracy ruled by law that dupes the masses and ensures their cooperation. The informal-- the Illuminati club, which actually makes the decisions regardless of what's happening on the formal level. The informal infiltrates the formal until the latter is merely a mask for the former.

Want to succeed? Join the club of secret Satan worshipers. That's what Barack Obama did.

In a post May 29, 2009, Emily Gyde, an Illuminati defector who claims to be the real author of the Harry Potter series, says Obama told her this:
"I remember PRESIDENT OBAMA talking to me about how he had joined the ILL CULT - he didn't want to - but he described himself as just an ordinary guy who wanted to take a wage packet home...that is how it was...he didn't want to end up on the streets...at the end of the day, it was all about money...you had to have it to live...if he hadn't joined the ILL CULT...he would have been disbarred...he wouldn't have got a job...wouldn't have been able to live...that's how a lot of people get conned into joining the ILL. You are young, you want to prove yourself in life - you are told that you will 'never get a job' if you don't...the ILL prove how powerful they are."
CONCLUSION
When I was a sixties radical, we used to think people who worked for the Establishment had sold their souls to the devil. I didn't imagine it was literally true, as the Illuminati are Satan worshipers, so you're unwittingly working for his disciples.

The world has been colonized by this Satanic cult. What we are experiencing, while trying to maintain some civilized traditions over Christmas, is their relentless attempt to induct us into their cult as mind-controlled servants.

----

I reckon that "TSA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_Security_Administration)" is part and parcel of making traveling more difficult... as well as "demerit points" or the Chinese "Social Credit System (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System)"

[onawah]

DR. ROBERT YOUNG on Camelot: VACCINES, VIRUSES, HCQ, NANO & RADIATION
August 6, 2020
https://projectcamelotportal.com/2020/08/06/dr-robert-young-viruses-hcq-and-more/

"I received the following statement and articles from Dr. Robert Young regarding viruses and vaccines:

..”The virus has never been identified, isolated, purified and cultured and proven to cause infections. So what is a virus – chemical and radiation poisoning. The rest is just a fairy tale that virologists like to tell themselves to give them a purpose. Virology is a religion based upon the faith that a virus might exist. It is the smoke screen for Big Pharma to poison babies, children and adults to reduce the surplus population for money. The viral theory is pure propaganda and Luciferian.”–Dr Robert O. Young

Hi Kerry, I wanted you to be aware the the vaccine from Moderna will kill millions in the name of a fake virus. I am sure you have heard that Moderna is in stage 3 of their vaccine testing. If all goes “well”, which it will (as a killer poison) it’ll become federal law in the USA for mandatory vaccination. [SIZE="2"]Here’s something you may not know. Guess who the first CEO of Moderna was? A Cornell graduate by the name of Anthony Fauci, who was a roommate with none other than Bill Gates. Are you paying attention? It was at Cornell that Bill Gates designed the RFID (Radio-frequency identification) and patented it under US2006257852. Are you awake yet? Now let’s really go down the rabbit hole. Moderna was a pharmaceutical company that started in Germany under the name IG Farben. IG Farben is infamous for it’s mass production of Zyklon-B, the primary gas used to kill millions during the Holocaust. After Germany fell, IG Farben was dissolved and its assets sold off by a Nazi turned American by the name of, you guessed it, George Soros. Soros rebranded the company as Moderna. And who was the primary stockholder of Moderna until his death? Jeffrey Epstein. His role in Moderna is where he made his fortune and established his connections. Let that sink in. Please help wake up the people! We are all being conditioned and controlled. Please share this information with everyone you love and care about.

Link to article:
www.drrobertyoung.com/post/air-pollution-poisoning-at-ground-zero-wuhan-china

Titanium Dioxide Poisoning

Nanoparticles (NP) are increasingly being in used in a wide range of applications, including biomedical and environmental. The potential hazard they may present is the focus of current nanotoxicology research. Among the nanoparticles with a broad spectrum of applications and known cellular responses are the carbon nanotubes, nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2) and nano-cerium oxide. TiO2 is a widely used pigment found in many consumer products that include cosmetics and sunscreens, toothpaste, food products (FDA approved) and prosthetic implants. TiO2 exists in three mineral forms: anatase, rutile and brookite; anatase and rutile have a tetragonal crystalline structure, brookite is orthorhombic. Anatase has high photocatalytic activity under UV light (an application of photocatalysis is the oxidation of organic pollutants in waste waters). The major routes of TiO2. NP exposure are inhalation and the skin. Studies conducted in parallel in mice and rats show similar patterns of lung neutrophilia in the two rodents and dependent on the form of TiO2 used. Intravenous and/or intraperitoneal administration leads to accumulation of TiO2 in the liver, spleen, kidney and lung but at different levels. Under various types of toxicity conditions, pulmonary toxicity in response to TiO2 is observed. It is believed that the observed pulmonary inflammation caused by TiO2 relates to oxidative stress and the expression of inflammatory cytokines. The in vivo studies show DNA strand breaks, chromosomal damage, endocrine and reproductive systems-related issues. TiO2, in its anatase form can interact with DNA in rat and mouse liver cells, either by inserting itself in-between DNA base pairs or binding to DNA nucleotide with three DNA oxygen or nitrogen atoms and two phosphorus. In vitro studies in human cell lines point to the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of TiO2. Results show impairment of DNA repair pathways, induction of oxidative stress and intrinsic apoptosis via activation of p53 signaling. P53 tumor suppressor transcription factor is a master regulator at the hub of many signaling and regulatory networks. TiO2 activates both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways via increased expression of Bax and Casp3 and of Fas and Casp8, respectively. TiO2 has also been shown to induce inflammatory responses via Toll-like receptor signaling involving Tlr4. Toll-like receptors represent a large family of pattern recognition receptors (PRR) that respond to a diverse array of exogenous and endogenous molecules. There are 10 known Toll-like receptors in mammals of which receptors 1 to 9 are conserved. All rely on adaptor proteins to initiate downstream events of which Myd88 represent the main adaptor protein. Thus, downstream events take place in an Myd88-dependent or independent manner. Tlr4 is the only receptor that employs both routes, albeit with different kinetics. Of note, TiO2 activation of Tlr4 is independent of Lbp and Cd14 – the proteins needed to facilitate LPS (lipopolysaccharide) binding by the Tlr4-Ly96 complex. In human keratinocytes, TiO2 diminishes mitochondrial function and affects carbohydrate, amino acids and polyamine metabolism. It has to be mentioned that the literature points to contradictory and conflicting results and data regarding both the toxicity and the particle size effects of TiO2 emphasizing the need for further experimental assessment. In addition, there may be variation in the responses of different species.
https://projectcamelotportal.com/wp-content/uploads/Dr.-Young-Pathway-Diagram-Nano-640x351.png
It is all about chemical and radiation poisoning. The viral theory is the smoke screen that has been used by those in power to control humanity.
https://projectcamelotportal.com/wp-content/uploads/dryoungreCVis-not-contagious-736x720.png
Over 1000 chemicals added to cigarettes and look at the denial and legal battle for years that smoking causes cancer. Over 90 percent of all cancers are cancers of the lung and 90 percent of those cancers are ALL preventable if one would just stop smoking cigarettes. There is no virus associated with or directly causing severe acute lung disease (SARS) There are zero deaths caused by the invisible virus. Why is it invisible? Because it does not exist except to those who want to destroy our economy, our country, our way of life and our belief in God! Over 500,000 people a month die from chemical poisoning from air pollution! Please read my latest article on chemical and radiation poisoning at:
www.drrobertyoung.com/post/air-pollution-poisoning-at-ground-zero-wuhan-china

Chemical & Radiation Poisoning at Ground Zero – Wuhan, China & New York City, New York

www.drrobertyoung.com

Yale study is focus group for vaccine language Message: This is Unbelievable. PLEASE use every means of getting this on the web, people need to know that the language coming down the pike on why they should get the vaccine is not the truth, nor is it a reflection of any confidence in the vaccine, it’s just the messaging that worked best in the focus group. If that doesn’t get people to wake up and realize that the FDA and CDC have been captured and now they are even using research resources to do market research for pharma. This is insane!
How can anyone believe anything that is being said when they see and understand what is really going on?
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04460703
https://projectcamelotportal.com/wp-content/uploads/areExosomesViruses-696x521.png
Virologists continually operate under the assumption that viruses are foreign infectious agents that “hijack” the human cell. They give details of mechanisms of how the virus works, and constantly superimposes this idea on top, despite, they do not make logical sense based on the information that they are explaining. Example: they go into great detail to explain the complicated coupling procedure that does not just require an ACE2 receptor, but requires host proteins to be embedded in the phantom virus in order for the membranes to merge so that the contents of the RNA are delivered to the interior of the cell. The virologist will state\ that this process is tightly controlled! At this point, the invisible virus essentially ceases to exist as it dumps a little bit of its genetic material “messenger RNA” into the cell!

It requires a leap of faith to believe that a bit of messenger RNA information would be harmful to any cell, or anything other than a report that it reads so that it can make an intelligent decision on how to proceed with its daily activity! There are 5 other issues that are quite disturbing!

1) Virologists attempt to show electron micrographs of the exosome which are all identical to each other when suggesting that the HIV exosome is different from the Coronavirus exosome.

2) Virologists completely ignore the idea of XMRVs which are foreign coronaviruses from a monkey or mouse. Do these coronaviruses have the embedded host proteins? Are they able to merge with “host” cells?

3) Virologists call HIV an “exosomal virion” which is the admittance that they are a normal part of human physiology! This is a huge problem when an entire field of science is based on an assumptive, lie, error or belief based on faith. This makes virology a religion and not a science. The whole basis of the virologist is to differentiate “viruses” from “exosomes” but they cannot because they have NO anatomical, genetic or biochemical evidence of its existence let alone its infectivity.

4) Virologists also state that dindridic cells that transport the so-called HIV virus from one place to another do so without being “infected”. Clearly this is another fact that supports that the human body is intelligently driving and cooperating with the function of these vesicles. This makes the dindridic cells pawns in a game that they can do little about. Acknowledging this fact by virology would be the logical jump rather than calling dindridic cells the Trojan Horse.

5) Exosomes share the surface proteins, they carry RNA, and they use the same pathways for use, but if you buy-in to the virus theory you have to make the distinction that viruses have an “evil genius” behind the scenes that cause them to be infectious. My recommendation is to dismantle the viral theory and focus on the real ’cause and effect’ relationships between health and disease. May I suggest the ‘terrain theory’ and that all dis-ease is born in us and from us due to personal choices of what we eat, what we drink, what we breathe, what we think, what we feel and what we believe. The viral theory is ONLY a concept that exists on a piece of paper.

See his website and further articles:

www.drrobertyoung.com/Also see:

DR. ROBERT O. YOUNG: COVID19 REVELATIONS AND BRINGING THE VIRUS MODEL INTO QUESTION

projectcamelotportal.com/2020/06/25/dr-robert-o-young-covid19-revelations-and-bringing-the-virus-model-into-question/

DR. ROBERT O. YOUNG: COROVIRUS IS JUST A CONCEPT THAT ONLY EXISTS ON PAPER. — LATEST ARTICLE

www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-corona-virus-is-just-a-concept-that-only-exists-on-paper

JOAk0tCH2es

Dr. Robert O. Young Speaking in Bali. – Recommended

W3Nj60gaSnY

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/doctors-pen-open-letter-fauci-regarding-use-hydroxychloroquine-treating-covid-19




Doctors Pen Open Letter To Fauci Regarding The Use Of Hydroxychloroquine for Treating COVID-19

Authored by George C. Fareed, MD Brawley, California Michael M. Jacobs, MD, MPH Pensacola, Florida Donald C. Pompan, MD Salinas, California,

August 12, 2020

Anthony Fauci, MD
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Washington, D.C.

Dear Dr. Fauci:

You were placed into the most high-profile role regarding America’s response to the Coronavirus pandemic. Americans have relied on your medical expertise concerning the wearing of masks, resuming employment, returning to school, and of course medical treatment.

You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical opinions. You are the de facto “COVID-19 Czar”. This is unusual in the medical profession in which doctors’ opinions are challenged by other physicians in the form of exchanges between doctors at hospitals, medical conferences, as well as debate in medical journals. You render your opinions unchallenged, without formal public opposition from physicians who passionately disagree with you. It is incontestable that the public is best served when opinions and policy are based on the prevailing evidence and science, and able to withstand the scrutiny of medical professionals.

As experience accrued in treating COVID-19 infections, physicians worldwide discovered that high-risk patients can be treated successfully as an outpatient, within the first 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms, with a “cocktail” consisting of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin (or doxycycline). Multiple scholarly contributions to the literature detail the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine-based combination treatment.

Dr. Harvey Risch, the renowned Yale epidemiologist, published an article in May 2020 in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to Pandemic Crisis”. He further published an article in Newsweek in July 2020 for the general public expressing the same conclusions and opinions. Dr. Risch is an expert at evaluating research data and study designs, publishing over 300 articles. Dr Risch’s assessment is that there is unequivocal evidence for the early and safe use of the “HCQ cocktail.” If there are Q-T interval concerns, doxycycline can be substituted for azithromycin as it has activity against RNA viruses without any cardiac effects.

Yet, you continue to reject the use of hydroxychloroquine, except in a hospital setting in the form of clinical trials, repeatedly emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting its use. Hydroxychloroquine, despite 65 years of use for malaria, and over 40 years for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, with a well-established safety profile, has been deemed by you and the FDA as unsafe for use in the treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Your opinions have influenced the thinking of physicians and their patients, medical boards, state and federal agencies, pharmacists, hospitals, and just about everyone involved in medical decision making.

Indeed, your opinions impacted the health of Americans, and many aspects of our day-to-day lives including employment and school. Those of us who prescribe hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin/doxycycline believe fervently that early outpatient use would save tens of thousands of lives and enable our country to dramatically alter the response to COVID-19. We advocate for an approach that will reduce fear and allow Americans to get their lives back.

We hope that our questions compel you to reconsider your current approach to COVID-19 infection.

Questions regarding early outpatient treatment

1. There are generally two stages of COVID-19 symptomatic infection; initial flu like symptoms with progression to cytokine storm and respiratory failure, correct?

2. When people are admitted to a hospital, they generally are in worse condition, correct?

3. There are no specific medications currently recommended for early outpatient treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 infection, correct?

4. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are used for hospitalized patients, correct?

5. There is currently no recommended pharmacologic early outpatient treatment for individuals in the flu stage of the illness, correct?

6. It is true that COVID-19 is much more lethal than the flu for high-risk individuals such as older patients and those with significant comorbidities, correct?

7. Individuals with signs of early COVID-19 infection typically have a runny nose, fever, cough, shortness of breath, loss of smell, etc., and physicians send them home to rest, eat chicken soup etc., but offer no specific, targeted medications, correct?

8. These high-risk individuals are at high risk of death, on the order of 15% or higher, correct?

9. So just so we are clear—the current standard of care now is to send clinically stable symptomatic patients home, “with a wait and see” approach?

10. Are you aware that physicians are successfully using Hydroxychloroquine combined with Zinc and Azithromycin as a “cocktail” for early outpatient treatment of symptomatic, high-risk, individuals?

11. Have you heard of the “Zelenko Protocol,” for treating high-risk patients with COVID 19 as an outpatient?

12. Have you read Dr. Risch’s article in the American Journal of Epidemiology of the early outpatient treatment of COVID-19?

13. Are you aware that physicians using the medication combination or “cocktail” recommend use within the first 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms, before the illness impacts the lungs, or cytokine storm evolves?

14. Again, to be clear, your recommendation is no pharmacologic treatment as an outpatient for the flu—like symptoms in patients that are stable, regardless of their risk factors, correct?

15. Would you advocate for early pharmacologic outpatient treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 patients if you were confident that it was beneficial?

16. Are you aware that there are hundreds of physicians in the United States and thousands across the globe who have had dramatic success treating high-risk individuals as outpatients with this “cocktail?”

17. Are you aware that there are at least 10 studies demonstrating the efficacy of early outpatient treatment with the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail for high-risk patients — so this is beyond anecdotal, correct?

18. If one of your loved ones had diabetes or asthma, or any potentially complicating comorbidity, and tested positive for COVID-19, would you recommend “wait and see how they do” and go to the hospital if symptoms progress?

19. Even with multiple studies documenting remarkable outpatient efficacy and safety of the Hydroxychloroquine “cocktail,” you believe the risks of the medication combination outweigh the benefits?

20. Is it true that with regard to Hydroxychloroquine and treatment of COVID-19 infection, you have said repeatedly that “The Overwhelming Evidence of Properly Conducted Randomized Clinical Trials Indicate No Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)?”

21. But NONE of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer were done in the first 5 to 7 days after the onset of symptoms- correct?

22. All of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer were done on hospitalized patients, correct?

23. Hospitalized patients are typically sicker that outpatients, correct?

24. None of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer used the full cocktail consisting of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Azithromycin, correct?

25. While the University of Minnesota study is referred to as disproving the cocktail, the meds were not given within the first 5 to 7 days of illness, the test group was not high risk (death rates were 3%), and no zinc was given, correct?

26. Again, for clarity, the trials upon which you base your opinion regarding the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, assessed neither the full cocktail (to include Zinc + Azithromycin or doxycycline) nor administered treatment within the first 5 to 7 days of symptoms, nor focused on the high-risk group, correct?

27. Therefore, you have no basis to conclude that the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail when used early in the outpatient setting, within the first 5 to 7 days of symptoms, in high risk patients, is not effective, correct?

28. It is thus false and misleading to say that the effective and safe use of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Azithromycin has been “debunked,” correct? How could it be “debunked” if there is not a single study that contradicts its use?

29. Should it not be an absolute priority for the NIH and CDC to look at ways to treat Americans with symptomatic COVID-19 infections early to prevent disease progression?

30. The SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 virus is an RNA virus. It is well-established that Zinc interferes with RNA viral replication, correct?

31. Moreover, is it not true that hydroxychloroquine facilitates the entry of zinc into the cell, is a “ionophore,” correct?

32. Isn’t also it true that Azithromycin has established anti-viral properties?

33. Are you aware of the paper from Baylor by Dr. McCullough et. al. describing established mechanisms by which the components of the “HCQ cocktail” exert anti-viral effects?

34. So- the use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin (or doxycycline) and zinc, the “HCQ cocktail,” is based on science, correct?

Questions regarding safety

1. The FDA writes the following: “in light of on-going serious cardiac adverse events and their serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for authorized use.” So not only is the FDA saying that Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work, they are also saying that it is a very dangerous drug. Yet, is it not true the drug has been used as an anti-malarial drug for over 65 years?

2. Isn’t true that the drug has been used for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis for many years at similar doses?

3. Do you know of even a single study prior to COVID -19 that has provided definitive evidence against the use of the drug based on safety concerns?

4. Are you aware that chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine has many approved uses for hydroxychloroquine including steroid-dependent asthma (1988 study), Advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis (1988 study), sensitizing breast cancer cells for chemotherapy (2012 study), the attenuation of renal ischemia (2018 study), lupus nephritis (2006 study), epithelial ovarian cancer (2020 study, just to name a few)? Where are the cardiotoxicity concerns ever mentioned?

5. Risch estimates the risk of cardiac death from hydroxychloroquine to be 9/100,000 using the data provided by the FDA. That does not seem to be a high risk, considering the risk of death in an older patient with co-morbidities can be 15% or more. Do you consider 9/100,000 to be a high risk when weighed against the risk of death in older patient with co-morbidities?

6. To put this in perspective, the drug is used for 65 years, without warnings (aside for the need for periodic retinal checks), but the FDA somehow feels the need to send out an alert on June 15, 2020 that the drug is dangerous. Does that make any logical sense to you Dr. Fauci based on “science”?

7. Moreover, consider that the protocols for usage in early treatment are for 5 to 7 days at relatively low doses of hydroxychloroquine similar to what is being given in other diseases (RA, SLE) over many years- does it make any sense to you logically that a 5 to 7 day dose of hydroxychloroquine when not given in high doses could be considered dangerous?

8. You are also aware that articles published in the New England Journal of Medicine and Lancet, one out of Harvard University, regarding the dangers of hydroxychloroquine had to be retracted based on the fact that the data was fabricated. Are you aware of that?

9. If there was such good data on the risks of hydroxychloroquine, one would not have to use fake data, correct?

10. After all, 65 years is a long-time to determine whether or not a drug is safe, do you agree?

11. In the clinical trials that you have referenced (e.g., the Minnesota and the Brazil studies), there was not a single death attributed directly to hydroxychloroquine, correct?

12. According to Dr. Risch, there is no evidence based on the data to conclude that hydroxychloroquine is a dangerous drug. Are you aware of any published report that rebuts Dr. Risch’s findings?

13. Are you aware that the FDA ruling along with your statements have led to Governors in a number of states to restrict the use of hydroxychloroquine?

14. Are you aware that pharmacies are not filling prescriptions for this medication based on your and the FDA’s restrictions?

15. Are you aware that doctors are being punished by state medical boards for prescribing the medication based on your comments as well as the FDA’s?

16. Are you aware that people who want the medication sometimes need to call physicians in other states pleading for it?

17. And yet you opined in March that while people were dying at the rate of 10,000 patient a week, hydroxychloroquine could only be used in an inpatient setting as part of a clinical trial- correct?

18. So, people who want to be treated in that critical 5-to-7-day period and avoid being hospitalized are basically out of luck in your view, correct?

19. So, again, for clarity, without a shred of evidence that the Hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail is dangerous in the doses currently recommend for early outpatient treatment, you and the FDA have made it very difficult if not impossible in some cases to get this treatment, correct?

Questions regarding methodology

The Key to Defeating COVID-19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It

1. In regards to the use of hydroxychloroquine, you have repeatedly made the same statement: “The Overwhelming Evidence from Properly Conducted Randomized Clinical Trials Indicate no Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine.” Is that correct?

2. In Dr. Risch’s article regarding the early use of hydroxychloroquine, he disputes your opinion. He scientifically evaluated the data from the studies to support his opinions. Have you published any articles to support your opinions?

3. You repeatedly state that randomized clinical trials are needed to make conclusions regarding treatments, correct?

4. The FDA has approved many medications (especially in the area of cancer treatment) without randomized clinical trials, correct?

5. Are you aware that Dr. Thomas Frieden, the previous head of the CDC wrote an article in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2017 called “Evidence for Health Decision Making – Beyond Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT)”? Have you read that article?

6. In it Dr. Frieden states that “many data sources can provide valid evidence for clinical and public health action, including “analysis of aggregate clinical or epidemiological data”-do you disagree with that?

7. Frieden discusses “practiced-based evidence” as being essential in many discoveries, such SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome)-do you disagree with that?

8. Frieden writes the following: “Current evidence-grading systems are biased toward randomized clinical trials, which may lead to inadequate consideration of non-RCT data.” Dr. Fauci, have you considered all the non-RCT data in coming to your opinions?

9. Risch, who is a leading world authority in the analysis of aggregate clinical data, has done a rigorous analysis that he published regarding the early treatment of COVID 19 with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. He cites 5 or 6 studies, and in an updated article there are 5 or 6 more-a total of 10 to 12 clinical studies with formally collected data specifically regarding the early treatment of COVID. Have you analyzed the aggregate data regarding early treatment of high-risk patients with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin?

10. Is there any document that you can produce for the American people of your analysis of the aggregate data that would rebut Dr. Risch’s analysis?

11. Yet, despite what Dr. Risch believes is overwhelming evidence in support of the early use of hydroxychloroquine, you dismiss the treatment insisting on randomized controlled trials even in the midst of a pandemic?

12. Would you want a loved one with high-risk comorbidities placed in the control group of a randomized clinical trial when a number of studies demonstrate safety and dramatic efficacy of the early use of the Hydroxychloroquine “cocktail?”

13. Are you aware that the FDA approved a number of cancer chemotherapy drugs without randomized control trials based solely on epidemiological evidence. The trials came later as confirmation. Are you aware of that?

14. You are well aware that there were no randomized clinical trials in the case of penicillin that saved thousands of lives in World War II? Was not this in the best interest of our soldiers?

15. You would agree that many lives were saved with the use of cancer drugs and penicillin that were used before any randomized clinical trials–correct?

16. You have referred to evidence for hydroxychloroquine as “anecdotal”- which is defined as “evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony”- correct?

17. But there are many studies supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine in which evidence was collected formally and not on personal testimony, has there not been?

18. So it would be false to conclude that the evidence supporting the early use of hydroxychloroquine is anecdotal, correct?

Comparison between the US and other countries regarding case fatality rate

(It would be very helpful to have the graphs comparing our case fatality rates to other countries)

1. Are you aware that countries like Senegal and Nigeria that use Hydroxychloroquine have much lower case-fatality rates than the United States?

2. Have you pondered the relationship between the use of Hydroxychloroquine by a given country and their case mortality rate and why there is a strong correlation between the use of HCQ and the reduction of the case mortality rate.?

3. Have you considered consulting with a country such as India that has had great success treating COVID-19 prophylactically?

4. Why shouldn’t our first responders and front-line workers who are at high risk at least have an option of HCQ/zinc prophylaxis?

5. We should all agree that countries with far inferior healthcare delivery systems should not have lower case fatality rates. Reducing our case fatality rate from near 5% to 2.5%, in line with many countries who use HCQ early would have cut our total number of deaths in half, correct?

6. Why not consult with countries who have lower case-fatality rates, even without expensive medicines such as remdesivir and far less advanced intensive care capabilities?


Giving Americans the option to use HCQ for COVID-19

1. Harvey Risch, the pre-eminent Epidemiologist from Yale, wrote a Newsweek Article titled: “The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it.” Did you read the article?

2. Are you aware that the cost of the Hydroxychloroquine “cocktail” including the Z-pack and zinc is about $50?

3. You are aware the cost of Remdesivir is about $3,200?

4. So that’s about 60 doses of HCQ “cocktail,” correct?

5. In fact, President Trump had the foresight to amass 60 million doses of hydroxychloroquine, and yet you continue to stand in the way of doctors who want to use that medication for their infected patients, correct?

6. Those are a lot of doses of medication that potentially could be used to treat our poor, especially our minority populations and people of color that have a difficult time accessing healthcare. They die more frequently of COVID-19, do they not?

7. But because of your obstinance blocking the use of HCQ, this stockpile has remained largely unused, correct?

8. Would you acknowledge that your strategy of telling Americans to restrict their behavior, wear masks, and distance, and put their lives on hold indefinitely until there is a vaccine is not working?

9. So, 160,000 deaths later, an economy in shambles, kids out of school, suicides and drug overdoses at a record high, people neglecting and dying from other medical conditions, and America reacting to every outbreak with another lockdown- is it not time to re-think your strategy that is fully dependent on an effective vaccine?

10. Why not consider a strategy that protects the most vulnerable and allows Americans back to living their lives and not wait for a vaccine panacea that may never come?

11. Why not consider the approach that thousands of doctors around the world are using, supported by a number of studies in the literature, with early outpatient treatment of high-risk patients for typically one week with HCQ + Zinc + Azithromycin?

12. You don’t see a problem with the fact that the government, due to your position, in some cases interferes with the choice of using HCQ. Should not that be a choice between the doctor and the patient?

13. While some doctors may not want to use the drug, should not doctors who believe that it is indicated be able to offer it to their patients?

14. Are you aware that doctors who are publicly advocating for such a strategy with the early use of the HCQ cocktail are being silenced with removal of content on the internet and even censorship in the medical community?

15. You are aware of the 20 or so physicians who came to the Supreme Court steps advocating for the early use of the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail.In fact, you said these were “a bunch of people spouting out something that isn’t true.”Dr. Fauci, these are not just “people”- these are doctors who actually treat patients, unlike you, correct?

16. Do you know that the video they made went viral with 17 million views in just a few hours, and was then removed from the internet?

17. Are you aware that their website, American Frontline Doctors, was taken down the next day?

18. Did you see the way that Nigerian immigrant physician, Dr. Stella Immanuel, was mocked in the media for her religious views and called a “witch doctor”?

19. Are you aware that Dr. Simone Gold, the leader of the group, was fired from her job as an Emergency Room physician the following day?

20. Are you aware that physicians advocating for this treatment that has by now probably saved millions of lives around the globe are harassed by local health departments, state agencies and medical boards, and even at their own hospitals? Are you aware of that?

21. Don’t you think doctors should have the right to speak out on behalf of their patients without the threat of retribution?

22. Are you aware that videos and other educational information are removed off the internet and labeled, in the words of Mark Zuckerberg, as “misinformation.”?

23. Is it not misinformation to characterize Hydroxychloroquine, in the doses used for early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 infections, as a dangerous drug?

24. Is it not misleading for you to repeatedly state to the American public that randomized clinical trials are the sole source of information to confirm the efficacy of a treatment?

25. Was it not misinformation when on CNN you cited the Lancet study based on false data from Surgisphere as evidence of the lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine?

26. Is it not misinformation as is repeated in the MSM as a result of your comments that a randomized clinical trial is required by the FDA for a drug approval?

27. Don’t you realize how much damage this falsehood perpetuates?

28. How is it not misinformation for you and the FDA to keep telling the American public that hydroxychloroquine is dangerous when you know that there is nothing more than anecdotal evidence of that?

29. Fauci, if you or a loved one were infected with COVID-19, and had flu-like symptoms, and you knew as you do now that there is a safe and effective cocktail that you could take to prevent worsening and the possibility of hospitalization, can you honestly tell us that you would refuse the medication?

30. Why not give our healthcare workers and first responders, who even with the necessary PPE are contracting the virus at a 3 to 4 times greater rate than the general public, the right to choose along with their doctor if they want use the medicine prophylactically?

31. Why is the government inserting itself in a way that is unprecedented in regard to a historically safe medication and not allowing patients the right to choose along with their doctor?

32. Why not give the American people the right to decide along with their physician whether or not they want outpatient treatment in the first 5 to 7 days of the disease with a cocktail that is safe and costs around $50?

Final questions

1. Fauci, please explain how a randomized clinical trial, to which you repeatedly make reference, for testing the HCQ cocktail (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc) administered within 5-7 days of the onset of symptoms is even possible now given the declining case numbers in so many states?

2. For example, if the NIH were now to direct a study to begin September 15, where would such a study be done?

3. Please explain how a randomized study on the early treatment (within the first 5 to 7 days of symptoms) of high-risk, symptomatic COVID-19 infections could be done during the influenza season and be valid?

4. Please explain how multiple observational studies arrive at the same outcomes using the same formulation of hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin + Zinc given in the same time frame for the same study population (high risk patients) is not evidence that the cocktail works?

5. In fact, how is it not significant evidence, during a pandemic, for hundreds of non-academic private practice physicians to achieve the same outcomes with the early use of the HCQ cocktail?

6. What is your recommendation for the medical management of a 75-year-old diabetic with fever, cough, and loss of smell, but not yet hypoxic, who Emergency Room providers do not feel warrants admission? We know that hundreds of U.S. physicians (and thousands more around the world) would manage this case with the HCQ cocktail with predictable success.

7. If you were in charge in 1940, would you have advised the mass production of penicillin based primarily on lab evidence and one case series on 5 patients in England or would you have stated that a randomized clinical trial was needed?

8. Why would any physician put their medical license, professional reputation, and job on the line to recommend the HCQ cocktail (that does not make them any money) unless they knew the treatment could significantly help their patient?

9. Why would a physician take the medication themselves and prescribe it to family members (for treatment or prophylaxis) unless they felt strongly that the medication was beneficial?

10. How is it informed and ethical medical practice to allow a COVID-19 patient to deteriorate in the early stages of the infection when there is inexpensive, safe, and dramatically effective treatment with the HCQ cocktail, which the science indicates interferes with coronavirus replication?

11. How is your approach to “wait and see” in the early stages of COVID-19 infection, especially in high-risk patients, following the science?

While previous questions are related to hydroxychloroquine-based treatment, we have two questions addressing masks.

1. As you recall, you stated on March 8th, just a few weeks before the devastation in the Northeast, that masks weren’t needed. You later said that you made this statement to prevent a hoarding of masks that would disrupt availability to healthcare workers. Why did you not make a recommendation for people to wear any face covering to protect themselves, as we are doing now?

2. Rather, you issued no such warning and people were riding in subways and visiting their relatives in nursing homes without any face covering. Currently, your position is that face coverings are essential. Please explain whether or not you made a mistake in early March, and how would you go about it differently now.

Conclusion

Since the start of the pandemic, physicians have used hydroxychloroquine to treat symptomatic COVID-19 infections, as well as for prophylaxis. Initial results were mixed as indications and doses were explored to maximize outcomes and minimize risks. What emerged was that hydroxychloroquine appeared to work best when coupled with azithromycin. In fact, it was the President of the United States who recommended to you publicly at the beginning of the pandemic, in early March, that you should consider early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and a “Z-Pack.” Additional studies showed that patients did not seem to benefit when COVID-19 infections were treated with hydroxychloroquine late in the course of the illness, typically in a hospital setting, but treatment was consistently effective, even in high-risk patients, when hydroxychloroquine was given in a “cocktail” with azithromycin and, critically, zinc in the first 5 to 7 days after the onset of symptoms. The outcomes are, in fact, dramatic.

As clearly presented in the McCullough article from Baylor, and described by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, the efficacy of the HCQ cocktail is based on the pharmacology of the hydroxychloroquine ionophore acting as the “gun” and zinc as the “bullet,” while azithromycin potentiates the anti-viral effect. Undeniably, the hydroxychloroquine combination treatment is supported by science. Yet, you continue to ignore the “science” behind the disease. Viral replication occurs rapidly in the first 5 to 7 days of symptoms and can be treated at that point with the HCQ cocktail. Rather, your actions have denied patients treatment in that early stage. Without such treatment, some patients, especially those at high risk with co-morbidities, deteriorate and require hospitalization for evolving cytokine storm resulting in pneumonia, respiratory failure, and intubation with 50% mortality. Dismissal of the science results in bad medicine, and the outcome is over 160,000 dead Americans. Countries that have followed the science and treated the disease in the early stages have far better results, a fact that has been concealed from the American Public.


Despite mounting evidence and impassioned pleas from hundreds of frontline physicians, your position was and continues to be that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not shown there to be benefit. However, not a single randomized control trial has tested what is being recommended: use of the full cocktail (especially zinc), in high-risk patients, initiated within the first 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms. Using hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin late in the disease process, with or without zinc, does not produce the same, unequivocally positive results.

Dr. Thomas Frieden, in a 2017 New England Journal of Medicine article regarding randomized clinical trials, emphasized there are situations in which it is entirely appropriate to use other forms of evidence to scientifically validate a treatment. Such is the case during a pandemic that moves like a brushfire jumping to different parts of the country. Insisting on randomized clinical trials in the midst of a pandemic is simply foolish. Dr. Harvey Risch, a world-renowned Yale epidemiologist, analyzed all the data regarding the use of the hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail and concluded that the evidence of its efficacy when used early in COVID-19 infection is unequivocal.

Curiously, despite a 65+ years safety record, the FDA suddenly deemed hydroxychloroquine a dangerous drug, especially with regard to cardiotoxicity. Dr. Risch analyzed data provided by the FDA and concluded that the risk of a significant cardiac event from hydroxychloroquine is extremely low, especially when compared to the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients with high-risk co-morbidities. How do you reconcile that for forty years rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients have been treated over long periods, often for years, with hydroxychloroquine and now there are suddenly concerns about a 5 to 7-day course of hydroxychloroquine at similar or slightly increased doses? The FDA statement regarding hydroxychloroquine and cardiac risk is patently false and alarmingly misleading to physicians, pharmacists, patients, and other health professionals. The benefits of the early use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent hospitalization in high-risk patients with COVID-19 infection far outweigh the risks. Physicians are not able to obtain the medication for their patients, and in some cases are restricted by their state from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. The government’s obstruction of the early treatment of symptomatic high-risk COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine, a medication used extensively and safely for so long, is unprecedented.

It is essential that you tell the truth to the American public regarding the safety and efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail. The government must protect and facilitate the sacred and revered physician-patient relationship by permitting physicians to treat their patients. Governmental obfuscation and obstruction are as lethal as cytokine storm.

Americans must not continue to die unnecessarily. Adults must resume employment and our youth return to school. Locking down America while awaiting an imperfect vaccine has done far more damage to Americans than the coronavirus. We are confident that thousands of lives would be saved with early treatment of high-risk individuals with a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. Americans must not live in fear. As Dr. Harvey Risch’s Newsweek article declares, “The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it.”

Very Respectfully,

George C. Fareed, MD, Brawley, California

Michael M. Jacobs, MD, MPH, Pensacola, Florida

Donald C. Pompan, MD, Salinas, California

[onawah]

SHEPARD AMBELLAS SUSPECTS MAJOR DISASTER IS ON THE WAY AS DEPT OF INTERIOR INSIDER BLOWS THE WHISTLE
8/16/20 1,668 views
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/shepard-ambellas-suspects-major-disaster-is-on-the-way-as-dept-of-interior-insider-blows-the-whistle/

(Not sure what to think about this :ohwell::decision::smash::twitch:)

"If you’re not a zombie, you know that the global response to the coronavirus makes no sense. Why are our fearless leaders crashing the global economy, forcing all of us to wait for a vaccine – for a virus with a mortality rate of 0.02%?

A vaccine that many believe can’t even be made?

Shepard Ambelleas, publisher of IntellHub joins Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth to discuss what it’s really about.

“‘COVID’, I was speculating, was some kind of operation that was allowing the military to be rolled-out, worldwide and put into place, possibly due to some kind of calamity that was coming; the eruption of Yellowstone to supervolcano or asteroid impacts or the passing of Planet X, which is going to cause a disruption and perturb things.

“If that’s the case, you know, they’ve openly admitted planets are moving into our solar system so…things could be happening.”

Ambellas refers to the Deagel 2025 Forecast, which I’ve been studying since mid-2015. The Deagel predictions are based on a merge of publicly-available reports from institutions such as the CIA, IMF and the UN. They also include a small amount of data coming from a variety of “shadow sources”.

Currently, the forecast is showing a population drop in the US by 2025 of over 99 million, with most of those fleeing/migrating out of the country. Deagel claims not to have a dog in this fight. The group are quite literally mercenaries. The site is focused on analyzing which markets are going to have budgets allocated to buy military aircraft, which is purportedly all they care about.

Ambellas says there are indications that all of the COVID measures we’ve been seeing are an exercise for a massive planetary catastrophe that’s headed our way."

h1Qywjt7Mm8

[greybeard]

Foster Gamble --Thrive
Depopulation Agenda

You might have to be a member to access this
Chris



https://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/depopulation-agenda-an-insider-of-the-elite-has-already-warned-us

Ps the The Thrive2 movie coming out.
http://www.thrivemovement.com/

Money out of nothing-- how the banking system works

https://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/global-scheme-exposed-the-1-elite-rigged-the-system-to-control-the-world

[greybeard]

Groundbreaking new material 'could allow artificial intelligence to merge with the human brain'
Anthony Cuthbertson
The Independent

Scientists have discovered a ground-breaking bio-synthetic material that they claim can be used to merge artificial intelligence with the human brain.

The breakthrough, presented today at the American Chemical Society Fall 2020 virtual expo, is a major step towards integrating electronics with the body to create part human, part robotic "cyborg" beings.

Connecting electronics to human tissue has been a major challenge due to traditional materials like gold, silicon and steel causing scarring when implanted.

Scars not only cause damage but also interrupt electrical signals flowing between computers and muscle or brain tissue. The researchers from the University of Delaware were able to overcome this after various types of polymers.

"We got the idea for this project because we were trying to interface rigid organic microelectrodes with the brain, but brains are made out of organic, salty, live materials," said Dr David Martin, who led the study.

"It wasn't working well, so we thought there must be a better way. We started looking at organic electronic materials like conjugated polymers that were being used in non-biological devices. We found a chemically stable example that was sold commercially as an antistatic coating for electronic displays."

The polymer, known as a Pedot, has exactly the properties needed to interface electronic hardware with human tissue without causing scarring while also dramatically improving the performance of medical implants.

The versatile Pedot polymer was also recently discovered to be capable of transforming standard house bricks into energy storage units, due to its ability to penetrate porous materials and conduct electricity.

The latest research used a Pedot film with an antibody that stimulates blood vessel growth after injury and could be used to detect early stages of tumour growth in the body.

Pedot polymers could also be used to help sense or treat brain or nervous system disorders, while versions could theoretically attach peptides, antibodies and DNA.

"Name your favourite biomolecule, and you can in principle make a Pedot film that has whatever biofunctional group you might be interested in," Dr Martin said.

The researchers made a polymer with dopamine, which plays a role in addictive behaviours.

Several companies and research institutions are already working on technology to connect brains to computers, with Elon Musk's Neuralink perhaps the closest to achieving a commercial product.

The startup plans to reveal more details about its brain chips later this month, which could one day provide "full-bandwidth data streaming" to the brain through a USB-C cable.

Mr Musk has made several claims about Neuralink's technology, stating earlier this year that it "could extend range of hearing beyond normal frequencies" and even allow people to stream music directly to their brains.

Such technology is essential for humans to compete with advanced artificial intelligence, according to Mr Musk. Last month he warned that humans risk being overtaken by AI within the next five years.


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/groundbreaking-material-could-allow-artificial-080230134.html

[Bill Ryan]

[B]SHEPARD AMBELLAS SUSPECTS MAJOR DISASTER IS ON THE WAY AS DEPT OF INTERIOR INSIDER BLOWS THE WHISTLE
8/16/20 1,668 views
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/shepard-ambellas-suspects-major-disaster-is-on-the-way-as-dept-of-interior-insider-blows-the-whistle/
(Not sure what to think about this :ohwell::decision::smash::twitch:)
I think you can disregard it. Too much of his information is incorrect or misunderstood. (Though I do agree there seems to be good cause to be on high alert for a few months. But we still don't know why.)


He doesn't know much about asteroids. The 2 November object (see this JPL page (https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/)) is only 1.8m—3.9m in diameter, and would certainly burn up in the atmosphere even it were to hit it — which it won't. At the moment, the closest possible approach to the earth is 0.02 LD (lunar distance), which is about 4,750 miles. There's absolutely zero risk.



When he refers to the national boundary of the US, he forgets that half of that is with Canada or Mexico. (Not with the ocean! :facepalm: )



The HIV component of SARS-CoV-2 (which I agree 100% seems to have been engineered,) seems to be a tiny specialized part of the HIV virus inserted into the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein that makes it more efficient as a virus to infect the healthy cells it targets. It's absolutely nothing to do with anyone getting AIDS.

[greybeard]

NEW DNA VACCINES WILL MUTATE OUR DNA, DOCTOR WARNS

NEW DNA VACCINES FOR CV19 & TRANSHUMANISM



https://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/new-dna-vaccines-will-mutate-our-dna-doctor-warns?postId=5f3bd0234f9d480017e4f3fb

I cant post the video
Perhaps a mod could

https://www.awakeningchannel.com/

This channel worth a visit -- quite a lot on it.
Chris

[graciousb]

Kissinger: Failure to establish post-COVID new world order ‘could set the world on fire’

I just had a bad case of Mandela-Effect, I was certain this piece of human excrement had died already!

The longevity of he and his ilk is really something isn't it?!

[Gwin Ru]

Illuminati Vowed in 1969: "Travel Will Be More Difficult" (https://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_vowed_in_1969_trave.html)

By Henry Makow
August 15, 2020
[...]
On March 20, 1969, Rockefeller Insider (http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/972.html) Dr. Richard Day (1905-1989) gave a speech to the Pittsburgh division of the American Medical Association in which he predicted:
(http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html)
" Travel ... would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID... later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual." (Tape two)
Although prohibited, Dr. Lawrence Dunegan made notes and related the contents of the speech to Randy Engel who made them available on tape. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfnQpHwY8QA)

Dr. Dunegan reveals not just "WHAT" is intended for America and all people in the world, but "HOW" the controllers intend to carry out their plan.


https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/r-day.jpg
Dr. Day said -- "Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now . . ."


"Some of you will think I'm talking about Communism. Well, what I'm talking about is much bigger than Communism!" "Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people; and second, is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it."
He covers topics such as:


People will have to get used to change - everything will change, constantly



The REAL and the "STATED" goals



Population Control



Permission to have babies



Redirecting the purpose of sex - sex without reproduction and reproduction without sex



Sex education as a tool of World Government



Encouraging homosexuality... Sex, anything goes



Euthanasia and the "Demise Pill"



Limiting access to affordable medical care makes eliminating the elderly easier



Planning the control over medicine



Elimination of private doctors



New Difficult to diagnose and untreatable diseases



Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control.



Inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination



Education as a tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and pushing evolution



and MUCH, MUCH MORE


The complete transcript of these tapes are available here. (http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians1.htm)

[...]
In a prequel of the above excerpt here is another piece of that agenda:


Revealing 1929 Magazine Article By Lord Birkenhead – Nothing New Under The Sun (https://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/revealing-1929-magazine-article-by-lord-birkenhead-nothing-new-under-the-sun/)

By Alan Watt (http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/radio/Special_Talks.html)
Dec 29, 2013


https://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/maxcdn_cache/2013/12/un-british.jpg


NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN
(Alan Watt (http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/radio/Special_Talks.html)) Today, people are so overwhelmed with the amount of information and disinformation and just sheer data. They don’t know what to make of it all. They often end up in a bigger confusion than the one they started with, chasing rainbows, false leads and trying to make sense. The human mind, each individual has a logic which depends upon incoming data.

When you can understand this concept, you can also interfere with it if you have power. You can encourage each individual at the bottom level to be completely concerned with their immediate environment. –Their little area. –Their homes, their area, the people around them, their town. Everything they need immediately for day-to-day survival, you encourage that and you can cut them off from bigger realities beyond, by either giving them false data concerning the big picture of the world in general or even their country. You simply withhold data and encourage the trivia.

That’s what most television stations, your local television stations, are all about. That’s their job, to make you think everything you need to know and worry about and care about you is just around you; and that used to be true, at one time, to a great extent.

For over 100 years we’ve had, at least the public have been given forms of communication from telephone and radio and television followed up. Long before this was decided to be given to the public, it was debated at very high levels whether the public should have it in the first place

When you look at Francis Bacon’s “New Atlantis,” a fictional story written in the 1500’s, published in 1602, concerning a future society which would have its headquarters in the West. They meant America, of course. They call it Solomon’s Island, run on virtue, and a secret society running the whole show, comprised of high intellectuals and scientists. There’s no way that Bacon could have imagined a society which powered itself with an energy which could give off the light of the sun. That’s very familiar, isn’t it, if you think of nuclear energy? People think, “That’s impossible. He couldn’t have imagined that.” He couldn’t have imagined that, you’re quite right, in the days of wind sails, canvas sails, the horse and cart and a candle to write by. We could not have imagined that at all, and neither did he, but then atomic energy was speculated upon thousands of years ago, if you go into the writings of the Atomist Organizations in Ancient Greece. These supposed “intellectuals,” simply because they had nothing better to do but pass their time wearing their white robes, and chatting away, and speculating that everything’s composed of these minute particles that spun around. Worlds within worlds called ATOMS, which is just a play on Adam, by the way, the Microcosm. Everything is interrelated in this big joke.

The trick in all ages is to keep real high sciences—which are constantly being investigated by special teams, all down through the ages—secret from the public. To have ultimate control, you can never share all your high knowledge, because sharing power means you lose power, if you want to be dominant. Yet, there’s no doubt that Francis Bacon’s book was published at that time. Not the updated versions that spin in aliens and all that kind of stuff. That’s the New Age spin that the elite have promoted to confuse us even further, because it’s much easier to believe the game’s over if aliens superior to you run the whole world and always have. That’s called “psychological warfare.” The purpose being that you’d give up before anything starts. Actually, “New Atlantis” was written along with other books like Moore’s book on his utopia, along the same lines of this elitist utopic society run by the intellectuals; those who have the right to rule the rest by their vast intellectual powers.

Sometimes they use authors like H.G. Wells. Today, there’s a whole bunch of them being put out there to give us predictive programming; the idea being that if we accept it subconsciously as a possibility, then they can guide you with possibility upon possibility; and then, when it becomes reality, you think it’s a natural evolution. However, it’s nothing of the kind. It’s planned that way in advance and it’s predictive programming.

Once in while, the elite in Britain, this elite being a very, very old elite called “The Establishment,” they’re there regardless of what party yells at each other across the Parliamentary floor. The elite decide what’s to be done. They pick the top politicians. It doesn’t matter about the ones down below. They’re allowed to compete for their little share in the booty of the public purse and fame and glory and high contracts when they leave for lobbyist jobs. The ones at the top are always picked in advance and groomed before the public even hear their names, as long as the top cabinet below to The Royal Institute, then everything is hunky-dory.

I’m going to read an article written in a magazine. It was written in the 1920’s. Think about this. I’ll tell you at the end which one it is and where to find it. On the cover, you’ll see a young British Lord who couldn’t have been more than 22, with his big long braided wig on. In the House of Lords, the guys who have hereditary peer-ships wear these long wigs and they get their robes with the ermine. They dress like something from the 1700’s. No one has ever explained the purpose of these particular wigs, but if you count the curls going up and down, you see the degrees. He has this young arrogant face, as they all do, very solemn, stern, arrogant and all knowing.

This is Lord Birkenhead and this is what he says, and he says all of the following because he’s allowed in to a higher circle of science which already existed, at least the basics of it did. He was let in on “the know.” The ones at the bottom that the public hear about are doing research. They don’t know about the findings of those above them done long ago.


This is from February 1929.
“Babies will be produced by chemists in laboratories;”
He’s talking about the year 2029.
“…the entire institution of marriage will be changed; we will all live to be 150; no one will need to work more than two hours a day; agriculture will be abolished except as a hobby and all foodstuffs will be produced synthetically; man will be able to alter the geography of climate of the world.“
Think about that.
“Coal mining will be an extinct industry. A 48-hour day will come into being by retarding the rotations of the earth. Sitting in our homes we will see and hear events the world over.”
1929. I’m going to continue here. Remember, this guy isn’t sitting with a crystal ball. He’s not channeling. He doesn’t have a medium next to him from his channeling Zeta Reticuli or some far away place.

Here’s the story:
“A century hence. It appears probable that the application of scientific discoveries will have altered the conditions of human life at least as much as they’ve done in the past hundred years. A child born in 1829 arrived in a world that was just beginning to exploit the steam engine in which electricity was the useless byway of a few professors where anesthetics and antiseptics were unknown.

“A child of 2029 looking back on 1929 will consider it as primitive and quaint as 1829 seems to the children of the present day. Our means of travel, our sources of wealth, our medicine and even our ideas will change as drastically during the next century as they did in the course of the last. Applied physics, which has given us the steam engine, the internal combustion motor as well as wireless telephones and all the many other practical uses of electrical energy will certainly make prodigious advances before the year 2029.

“At the moment however, the theoretical basis of physics rests in an undetermined state. Physics is on the brink of a new synthesis, a fresh simplification and restatement of fundamental ideas. This when it comes, and it cannot long be delayed must radically change all our assumptions concerning time, space and the nature of change. Such a revolution of ideas must be accounted among the most important effects of science upon human life in the next century. But, it is of course very difficult to predict what direction this change of ideas will take. Until now, Newton who states physical theory one cannot determine how his restatement will react upon the everyday world. It is easier to prophesy concerning the material changes which will be wrought by applied physics in the next hundred years. The best scientific opinion believes that before 2029 physicists will have solved the problem of supplying the world with limitless amounts of cheap power.

“At present, we derive the energy which drives the wheels of industry from coal and oil. Both these substances are won from nature at the expenses of much money and vast stores of muscular energy, nor are their supplies inexhaustible. By means of the most efficient methods, moreover, a pound of coal can only be made to yield energy of the order of one horsepower for one hour. Yet, locked up in the atoms which constitute a pound of water, there is an amount of energy equivalent to ten million horsepower hour. There is no question that this colossal source of energy exists; but as yet physicists do not know how to release it, or having done so, how to make it perform useful work. This problem will be solved before 2029. Some investigator, at present in his cradle or unborn, will discover the match with which to light this bonfire, or the detonator needed to cause this terrific explosion.

“The consequences of tapping such stupendous sources of cheap energy are almost illimitable. For the first time in his history, man will be armed with sufficient power to undertake operations on a cosmic scale. It will be opened to him radically to alter the geography or climate of the world. By utilizing some 50,000 tons of water, the amount displayed by a larger liner, it would be possible to remove Ireland to the deeper portion of the Atlantic Ocean. The heat obtainable from the same quantity of water would suffice to maintain the Polar Regions at the temperature of the Sahara for a thousand years.”
Think about it.
“The liberation of this energy naturally will revolutionize travel and transport. Engines weighing one ounce for each horsepower they develop will become practical possibilities; and a power plant of six hundred horsepower will carry fuel for a thousand hours, working in a tank no bigger than a fountain pen.

Concerning the nature of the vehicles for which such engines will provide the motive power, is it rash to prophesy. Passengers will travel in enormously swift aeroplanes, which by 2029 will ascend and descend vertically. Goods will be carried cheaply and rapidly by land or sea, propelled by motors whose fuel bill will be almost nil.

The coming of this new energy obviously will be accompanied by acute social problems. Its adaptation to industry will entail for example the final extinction of coal mining. Since however it cannot but vastly reduce the cost of oil manufacturers it is hoped that the new wealth it creates will enable governments adequately to provide for the millions whose livelihood it destroys. Some authoritative scientists do not believe that the solution of the power problem will be reached along these lines consider either the winds or the tides will be forced to yield up their energy. Water power is to unevenly distributed over the earth’s surface and too much affected by seasonal variations ever to become the principal source of the world’s energy, but the winds are never still and the tides flow and ebb with unvarying precision. If the winds were harnessed, we could produce a super abundance of cheap power. During stormy weather the surplus energy could be stored in a variety of ways and so be available during calms.”
I’ll break for a second here to tell you that this character, this Lord had been given access to a future already decided upon. The reason being he was a hereditary peer of the realm, a Lord who gains access to the business plan; and they never change their plans.
“The exploitation of title energy presents difficulties which are yet to be solved in a satisfactory manner. These difficulties however are not those of principle but of technique and of the wealth and the serious engineering attention of the world were focused on the question for ten years, there’s no doubt that they would be overcome. The tides of the Bay of Fundy alone could supply the whole of North America with electrical energy by utilizing title energy to any large extent, which will diminish the speed of the earth’s rotation. As it is, the tides act as a break upon the rotation of the earth.”
That’s true. As we spin, it’s almost like a drag as it catches up and tries to catch up. For every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. That’s the old theory.

To continue:
“As it is, the tides act as a brake upon the rotation of the earth. Tidal friction occurs principally in the Bering Sea, which divides Alaska from Siberia. Its present effect is negligible, since it does but lengthens the day by a fraction less than a second in the course of each century.

“If sufficient energy were extracted from the tides to supply every imaginable future development of human enterprise with power, this braking effect would not be greatly increased. Many millions of years would elapse before the day grew as long as our present week. Five thousand years takes us back to the dawn of recorded human history.”
That’s his little lie, because he’s well aware it’s much older.
“So that even a tenth part of 1,000,000 years carries us forward beyond the reach of imagination. We need not therefore, grow alarmed that by harnessing the tides we shall so retard the rotation of the earth as to embarrass our remotest descendants. But the forty-eighthour day is a possibility in the far future. During the next hundred years, applied physics will certainly develop wireless telephony and television beyond our present most imaginative expectations. By 2029 it should be possible for any person sitting at home to be present at no matter what distant event stereoscopic television…”
This is before the public got TV, remember, even mono.
“…in full natural colors and perfected wireless telephony will enable him to see and hear any event which is broadcast as effectively as if he stood beside the transmitting apparatus. Such developments must influence the future of politics, but by their aid it will be feasible once more to revive that form of democracy which flourished in the city-states of ancient Greece. By 2029, the chosen spokesmen of each political party will be able to address every voter as effectively as they now can address the House of Commons and so the electorate itself rather than its representatives made decide each vital political issue.”
They’ve got to give you a bit of icing on the cake to make you believe it and want to eat the cake.
“After the spokesman of each party has had his or her say the votes for the entire country could be recorded and counted by mechanisms installed in telephone exchanges. Within 20 minutes from the end of the last speech the will of the national jury on any subject will be ascertained and announced.”
He’s talking about computer voting.
“Applied chemistry has not affected human life in a manner comparable with the changes produced by physical research. So far the ordinary man’s concern chemistry is only useful to him when it discovers new desirable substances or discovers a means of synthesizing material more cheaply than is produced in nature. In the past, chemists have enriched the resources of humanity with new metals and dyes, drugs, explosives and other substances useful in industry on private life.

“By 2029, thousands more, such new substances will be available. Aluminum will be cheaper than pig iron is today malleable and unbreakable glass will be a common place of domestic life. It’s also been suggested that chemical research will turn to the discovery of new physiologically pleasant substances. At present civilized mankind has discovered and adopted in the three such substances such as tobacco, alcohol and caffeine for tea and coffee. These certainly have added enormously to the amenities of existence and Dr. J.B.S. Haldane has proposed that chemists should seriously consider a search for many more such additions to human enjoyment.

“Most chemical substances are either disagreeable or dangerous in their physiological effects. Though a small number, not more than a few thousand are valuable to medicine. Should chemistry in the next hundred years be able to discover a dozen substances as pleasant and as harmless as tobacco each producing a different effect on the consumer it would have earned the thanks of every hard worked man and woman in the world.”
They love to dope us all, you see.
“Any developments in physics and chemistry which recently made and predicted to occur before 2029 do no more than alter the accidentals of human existence and biology, however developments may be predicted which will change the whole nature of life as we experience it today. Even those who know least about the confidently expect prodigious advances from medicine and surgery in the near future and their faith will not be in vain. The abolition of epidemic disease by 2029 is fairly certain as is the discovery of cures for such scourges as cancer and tuberculosis.”
That’s true. They do have all the cures. It’s just that the public will never see them.
“Complete and prolonged local anesthesia will become practicable so that not only will operations be painless but the patient will feel no pain afterwards as a result of them. Such an advance also entails completely painless childbirth. Biologists by 2029 will have learned the secrets of the living chemistry of the human body or at least enough of it to achieve startling results. Rejuvenation will be an ordinary and well recognized matter of a few injections at appropriate intervals.”
Certainly not for you, boys and girls, I can assure you that.
“The desire to keep old age at bay has ever been one of the dreams of humanity. At last, we can predict that it will be achieved. This mortal must put off immortality by extending the length of his days on earth. The attraction of such an idea, especially to women, who will no longer grow old quickly, is far too clear to require emphasis. But the universal practice of rejuvenation will be accompanied by grave social problems, the least of which would be the immensely increasing population. Suppose it possible to guarantee 150 years of life to every healthy child. How will the youths of twenty be able to compete in the professions or in business or against vigorous men still in their prime at 120 with a century of experience on which to draw? The benefit to humanity, which will accrue if the lives of men of genius are so prolonged, is obvious. Before 2029, biologists will have solved some of the mysteries of human heredity. Heredity is determined by certain ‘genes’ or units, concerning which science already knows much. They are minute bodies, so small that if a hen’s egg were magnified to the size of the world, one of the genes in it would lie on a fair-sized dining table. When biologists can control these they will be able to control heredity.“
This, remember, is 1929, you know before they discovered a lot of stuff.
“Most probably by 2029 a clever young man will consider his fiancée’s hereditary complexion before proposing marriage…”
He’s talking about eugenics here.
“…and the young woman of that day will refuse him because he has inherited a gene from his father which will predispose their children to quarrelsomeness.”
He’s talking about behavior you see, personal behavior. It’s interesting he doesn’t touch on the physical disability part. These guys are eugenicists. This is the elite talking here.
“By intelligent combination of suitable genes it will be possible to predict with reasonable certainly that truly brilliant children shall be born of a marriage.”
That’s called “genetic enhancement” today. They had that term back then, but we didn’t know about that. We’re kept in the dark. He’s talking in the days of the dirigible balloon and the bi-plane. He’s talking about taking out the bad genes. You know the inferior types that might make you quarrelsome or disobedient to your superiors. That’s what he’s talking about, it was all discussed even before this guy was born that’s writing this.
“It is possible, however, that by 2029 the whole question of human hereditary and eugenics will be swallowed up by the prospect of ectogenetic birth, By this is meant the development of a child from a fertilized cell outside its mother’s body in a glass vessel filled with serum on a laboratory bench. Such a proceeding is neither incredible nor indeed impossibly remote. The result of much research shows that the connection between a mother and her growing child are purely chemical; there is no valid reason why one day biologists should not be able perfectly to imitate that chemical connection in the laboratory.”
What it means really is you’ll be born and immediately you go “ga-ga-ga” and start trying to cuddle your Petri dish as your mother or the bench you’re on; because this love bonding stuff is, just you know, it’s all ‘nonsense’. It’s purely chemical. This was all decided about long, long before the public heard about the little tidbits that we’re given from the ‘60’s onwards, as though it was a brand new idea. Here’s this guy in 1929 writing about it, because he didn’t come up with this either. He was let in on “the know.” It was all decided in the previous century, the 1800’s.
‘The possibility of ectogenetic children will naturally arouse the fieriest antagonism. Religious bodies of many different creeds will rally their adherence to fight such a fundamental biological invention. In fact, the near mention of its possibility here may strike many readers as gratuitously disgusting. Nevertheless the thing is possible and since it’s possible it is certain that scientists will be deterred by no persecution from straining after it.”
All the reactions of the public are already figured out in advance and overcome when they announce these things. All the debating or the problems they foresee are debated and overcome before they tell us any of this stuff, and then retell us later on as though it was brand new again.
“Should ectogenesis ever become an established part of human society its effects will be shattering. Primarily it will separate reproduction from marriage and the latter institution will become wholly changed. Further, the character of the future inhabitants of any state could be determined by the government which happened temporarily to enjoy power.”
Remember too, this character is the same age group as Aldous Huxley that wrote “Brave New World” in the 1930’s. They all knew this stuff because they were in on “the know.” All this stuff they’re talking about had already been done secretly a long time ago.
“Further, the character of the future inhabitants of any state could be determined by the government…”
Further, I’ll say that again.
“…the character of the future inhabitants of any state could be determined by the government which happened temporarily to enjoy power by regulating the choice of the ectogenic parents of the next generation. The cabin of the future could breed a nation of industrial dullards.”
That means morons, folks.
“…or live in the population with fifty thousand charmingly irresponsible mural painters.”
This is a little high-class joke, chuckle, chuckle.
“A further immediate consequence of ectogenesis would be a plea that society should be allowed to produce the human types it most needs instead of being forced to absorb all the unsuitable types which happen to be born.”
Eugenics again and the planned society, arranged long ago, long before you were even born or your parents were born.
“If it were possible to breed a race of strong healthy creatures intelligent to perform intricate drudgery yet lacking all ambition, what ruling class would resist the temptation? Many of the arguments brought against slavery would be powerless in such a case, for the ectogenic slave of the future would not feel his bonds. Every impulse which makes slavery degrading and irksome to ordinary humanity would be removed from his mental equipment. He wouldn’t care as long as happiness would be his task. He would be the exact human counterpart of the worker bee.”
Oh, where have we heard that before, going all the way back to ancient Egypt? Oh boy, oh boy, as above, so below.
“Only the arguments of religion could be used to prevent this evolution.”
Evolution, here we go.
“His emancipation could never be considered, for in freedom he would find only crushing boredom and misery.“
I’ve got to work. I’ve got to work. I’ve got to just work a hundred hours. I just have to do it to make me happy.
“It seems improbable however that the future developments of industry will call for such a being to tend it wheels. Production will become so cheap, and barring political international upheavals, wealth will accumulate to such an extent that the ectogenetic robot will never be needed.”
The humans now are robots. These are Golem.
“It is far more likely that men will work as machine minders for one or two hours a day and be free to devote the rest of their energies to whatever form of activity they enjoy. Such a condition obviously presupposes that all drudgery, not only the drudgery of the coal mine and the machine shop will be abolished by science. It predicates the end of agriculture as the fundamental industry upon which human life rests.”
Think about that.
“Probably biology in alliance with chemistry will make an end of agriculture even sooner and the cheapening of production will render a ten hour maximum week universal in the workshops of the world. By 2029 agriculture if not abolished will be in decay at least in civilized lands.“
They knew that back then you see and long before.

“The first step towards the end of agriculture will be the production of benevolent bacteria able to fix the atmospheric nitrogen which is essential to the growth of plant life. Such bacilli never could develop naturally since many of their ancestors will be unable to live except under entirely artificial conditions in the laboratory; and when the active nitrogen fixing bacteria are at last hardened off and allowed to multiply in agricultural land, their immediate effect would be to act as a super efficient manure by their aid. Five or even ten years of wheat will grow where one grows now, while the pasture which now feeds ten beasts will feed fifty.

“Such a development will of course be watched with anxious eyes by all governments. Food prices will slump. Millions of laborers all over the world will find their livelihood vanished. Hard on the heels of this development will come the perfection of synthetic foodstuffs. At present, we nourish ourselves by a curiously wasteful and roundabout method. Solar energy is absorbed by plants and stored by them in their structures mainly in the form of cellulose. The human body is unable to digest cellulose and so to extract nourishment from it. Many animals however aided by obliging bacteria are able to perform this feat and keep herds of sheep, cattle and pigs all on the base new task of digesting cellulose and transforming it into the meat and milk upon which we live. Already it is impossible to convert indigestible cellulose into digestible sugar. But as yet, the cost of the operation prevents its being carried out except as a laboratory experiment. Such processes as this will certainly be further investigated and developed so that by 2029 starch and sugar, two of our most valuable foods will be as cheap as sand or sawdust today.

“Concerning proteins, the other most important human foods, two possibilities exist. Either they too will be produced synthetically or else the more highly prized varieties of animal foods such for example as beef steak or chickens breast will be grown in suitable media in the laboratory. From one parent’s steak of choice tenderness it will be possible to grow as large and as juicy steak as can be desired, so long as the parent is supplied with the correct chemical nourishment. It will continue to grow indefinitely and perhaps eternally. Whenever it is sufficiently large, a few pounds can be cut from it and sent to market.

“Synthetic foods and the production of animal tissues in vitro will finally set at rest those tissues of those timid minds which prophesied a day when the earth’s resources will not feed her children. But if all the inhabitable surface of the globe were inconveniently crowded, the millions of mankind could still be feed to repletion by such means. This second revolution in food production will consummate the decay of agriculture, which can only survive as a rich man’s hobby. Probably however, the synthetic foods of the next century will be so much more easily digested and appetizing that their present equivalents that agriculture will survive only in historical romances. Since the beginnings of history the city has been the parasite of the countryside.”
Boy, he’s right there.
“In 2029 science will make the city a self-supporting unit and Britain the land of laboratories capable of feeding no matter how many millions of mouths without importing a ton of foodstuffs. Many will bewail such a prospect for they insist that a flourishing agricultural peasantry is the only sound basis of any political life. It will be necessary when agriculture goes into irrevocable decay to plan the evolution of a stable industrial society. Such an undertaking should not lie beyond human wit. The agricultural basis of society, which has existed for so many centuries, was itself evolved from nomads and savages to reconcile such folk with a peaceful static life of the husbandman’s need far more violent adjustment, than will be necessary to urbanize the descents of the world’s present agriculturalists.

“It’s conceivable that not all these changes will have occurred by 2029. The progress of scientific discovery is checkered and subject to no ascertainable regularity or period. In many instances, an applied science after a few years of violent progress stagnates or at best is advanced by small refinements and simplifications. The history of the locomotive steam engine provides an illustration. During the last century railroad trains have grown steadily longer and heavier. In consequence, larger and more powerful engines have evolved to draw them to their destinations, but the huge locomotive of today differs only in size and power from its parent of the 1860’s and 1870’s. No new principle of any importance has been introduced into its design or construction.

“A similar stagnation may overtake the development of airplanes or of wireless telephony. Such halts in the progress of any applied science however are comparative and not final. A fresh mind produces a new idea or a simplification which inaugurates another period of rapid and speeding activity. I have assumed therefore that the rate of progress in applied physics, chemistry and biology during the next hundred years will be maintained approximately at its present level. It may even be greatly accelerated by the ever-increasing interest in scientific research on the part of industrialists and governments.

“Nevertheless, unless science is able to change their ideas no less rapidly than our environment, some of the developments of which I have hinted may not come to pass. Unless, for example the ideas of Asiatic peoples have drastically changed, it will impossible to stamp out epidemic disease from the world. But it is not self evident that all applications of scientific discovery deserve the support of intelligent men and women; because science has benefited humanity in the past, there’s no reason why it always should do so in the future. A biological discovery may well plunge the world into such a catastrophe as it would destroy civilization for a thousand years. As you are reading these words, some disinterested researcher may detonate an atomic explosion which will involve the world and reduce it to a flaring vortex of incandescent gas.”
There you have that one. That is from the Cosmopolitan Magazine, February 1929 when it was owned by Randolph Hearst. This little talk on our future, with much of what we’re seeing happen today and much of this information re-released in the 1960’s and onwards, as though it was brand new. It was written in 1929 by Lord Birkenhead of England, one of those “in the know.” You’ll see his photograph on the first page of his talk in the magazine, with his big wig on and all his curls of this artificial rug that he wears and the arrogant upper class official appearance that he puts on there. I think they must practice that from birth, and a little emblem of Saturn on the left, Old Kronos, who eats his children. Then you have two lighting bolts behind him, which turned out eventually to be the sign and the symbols of the Nazis. What does it all have in common? I do wonder.

Science is not new. All the things we’re told about are obsolete. All the stuff that we use is obsolete; and in fact, before we get any of it, there’s massive debates at very high levels as to whether they should give it to the public. There’s always a material purpose in doing so, as we snap up all the goodies and say, “my goodness, isn’t this fun, fun, fun. I can play longer and more,” and yet we’re all brought into a catch-22, where we can’t think for ourselves anymore because it’s all done for us. Many people in today’s world are quite happy with that arrangement. They haven’t consciously thought it through. In fact, most people (and it’s true) don’t really consciously think much through it all. Their ideas are marketed to them and downloaded into them, as efficiently as a program is downloaded into the computer; because essentially, we are just “walking computers,” in a sense.

You can also detect the double-speak of Lord Birkenhead as he talks about methods of controlling the population growth. On the other hand, he talks about millions of people being able to eat because of they can easily synthesize foods. The double-speak. He didn’t want to panic the general herd too quickly. He left that to his later offspring and relatives who’ve been drumming the drums, since about the ‘60’s onwards, about crisis, crisis; too many people. “My goodness, what shall we do?” Hence all the abortion clinics opened up all over the place and free sex was promoted; free love in order to create the problem to give the solution and need more abortion clinics and legalize it all. Before you know it, a fetus (which is a baby) is just a wart and you can get rid of that, can’t you?

There’s nothing happens in society that isn’t planned long ago and debated long ago by those who already ruled the world and ruled this system. This one financial system of commerce, working and laboring, and buying and selling that we are all taught to grow up and compete in. When he gave the speech, of course, the agriculturalists couldn’t really picture being out of work, even if it was “ha-ha, that’s silly. We’ll always be rearing these cows here.” We’ve already seen the agribusinesses being promoted. These big foundations and businesses that have buildings opposite every capital of the world and they lobby all the politicians. Most of them either having been politicians themselves, or they will be after they leave their CEOs position back into politics, back and forth like ping-pong balls. We’re under this corporate fascistic system already; and we have been really all our lives.

The purpose of life has never been discussed by the ordinary people. They’ve never had a say in anything, to be honest with you. Even when we think we’re winning a little bit and getting a little bit more of the material world, the goodies, even the things you need to survive have a temporary respite. They’re already designing the plug to be pulled a little further down the road. So the Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away—Lords like Lord Birkenhead.

If you’re allowed to clear land and create a farm with hard work and sweat and tears, it’s all right; because once you’ve done it, they’ll simply tax it from you to get you off the land or put you out with massive fines because you can’t keep up with the ever increasing standards—building standards and codes and land codes et cetera. Yes, two or three generations down the road they can take it back from you. You’ve created some real estate and the big agri-businesses move in and say, “thank you very much for your hard work and now it’s ours for peanuts.”

Remember, the releases of this Birkenhead are just the same kind of releases of Francis Bacon or Moore (the “Utopia”) and many others who have been given inside information from higher sciences. Not from the professors down, but much higher up where they’d already been investigating many different areas to do with everything we now think they’re investigating today. It’s all been done a long time ago. That’s why they all it research: RE-search. At the bottom level, they don’t know that it’s all been done before by much higher levels that are kept secret from everyone, except those at the top.

That’s how power really is. It doesn’t share itself. It gives you an illusion occasionally of having choices, but in reality all of your decisions were made a long time ago with “your betters.” You know those people who are your betters, because “we have better genes than you,” you see. They’re not Levis. They’re good genes [jeans], better ones, old genes that are mated up with other good genes. These genes last a long while before they wear out, obviously, and they’re still here today, as they mate each other up and marry their power and add to power and money; and, of course, the psychopathic trait of the gene that they have is passed on to their offspring. They’re not as silly as people would like to make out. They have a natural instinct for power and control and dominating others, sometimes with the most pleasant faces—another gift of the psychopath. Always depending on the fact that ordinary normal people with empathy, with consciences will believe them, whatever they say. They cannot believe (the ordinary people with empathy) that there are such evil cruel people who would do the most horrific things to not just us, but anyone across the planet—because the end justifies the means, and they sleep well at night. That’s why they get away with it. They start wars. They’ll continue wars. They profit from wars.

The structure of society is held together by natural laws, which are well understood and exploited by those that know the sciences. Formulas that worked thousands of years ago are RE-applied in the same sequence, always with the same results with the populations. We believe what we’re told. We do what we’re told and then we look towards these benefactors at the top, these superior people to take care of us. Many people like it that way when they’re reared in this socialistic system of expert rule, scientific rule. We have no time to go and play while these weighty decisions are all made for us by the superior ones above us. We’re well managed and dictated to, from cradle to grave, and it’s getting worse all the time as each department above us of bureaucracy shows their teeth and shows their power with more and more powers being demanded over the public.

This is a battle for the heart and soul and the mind, and the right to decide a future for ourselves. Where do you stand on this?


Full transcript (http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu/english/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Nothing_New_Under_the_Sun_July182007.html)
Download the MP3 audio of the full transcript (http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu/english/audioArchives/blurbs/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Nothing_New_Under_the_Sun_July182007.mp3)
For detailed information own the Cutting Through three volume book by Alan Watt (http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu/english/booksEnglish.html)


Alan Watt Blurb - Hereditary Peer's 1929 Article Describes The World In 2029 - July 18, 2007 1:00:37

Mar 23, 2013

D2AHNGnooxY

[pueblo]

This video is a beautiful case of ' tables turned' on TV journalists live on air.

The Spanish doctor (Dr. Luis de Benito) blows the lid off the media's fear generating hype, the presenters were not able to deal with this guy's truth saying.

Satisfying to watch.

(Spanish with Eng Sub)

SwlkumcRf6w

[Gwin Ru]

This video is a beautiful case of ' tables turned' on TV journalists live on air.

The Spanish doctor (Dr. Luis de Benito) blows the lid off the media's fear generating hype, the presenters were not able to deal with this guy's truth saying.
...
See this post as well :) : http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111616-America-s-Frontline-Doctors-Fighting-Back&p=1373304&viewfull=1#post1373304

[pueblo]

This video is a beautiful case of ' tables turned' on TV journalists live on air.

The Spanish doctor (Dr. Luis de Benito) blows the lid off the media's fear generating hype, the presenters were not able to deal with this guy's truth saying.
...
See this post as well :) : http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111616-America-s-Frontline-Doctors-Fighting-Back&p=1373304&viewfull=1#post1373304

Thanks, hadn't seen that, apologies for the double post.

[Franny]

From CA Fitts. The article she references is posted below.

https://twitter.com/TheSolariReport/status/1296172166401138688


MODERNA PARTNERS WITH AWS TO EXPLORE THE ‘SOFTWARE OF LIFE’

Published: Jan. 16, 2020

By Alex Keown

BioSpace

The software of life. (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/15/how-moderna-uses-amazon-cloud-to-produce-a-new-class-of-medicines.html) That’s how Stephane Bancel, the chief executive officer of Moderna (https://www.biospace.com/employer/397613/moderna-inc-/), described messenger RNA (mRNA), which is at the core of Moderna’s drug development process.

Moderna is pioneering mRNA drugs that are believed to be able to direct the body to produce any protein of interest, including antibodies and other proteins that can create therapeutic activity. Bancel said mRNA is an information molecule.

“It’s like software,” he said.

The company, which has secured enormous investments over the past few years, is inching closer to being a commercial company in developing personalized therapies for a wide range of diseases, including cancer. In order to create those personalized medicines, the Cambridge, Mass.-based company relies on gene sequencing and a partnership with one of the world’s largest companies – Amazon.

In an interview with CNBC’s Jim Cramer during the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference this week, Bancel said the company relies on Amazon Web Services to “compare every letter of DNA” in the sequencing process. Once that is done, the company can deduce what needs to be done to develop personalized medicine, Bancel explained.

Amazon Web Services, the fastest growing division of the company, according to CNBC, provides on-demand cloud computing platforms to companies. Moderna is currently using Amazon Web Services with more than a dozen drug candidates in its pipeline, which means the high-tech platform plays a central role in the company’s drug development program. As CNBC explains, the company is using the powerful cloud-based service to speed up the time it takes a drug candidate to move from the preclinical to the clinical phase. In addition to Moderna, Amazon Web Services is being used by several pharmaceutical companies, including San Diego-based Human Longevity Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and more.

The reliance on the high-speed program could lead to the company finally becoming a commercial entity 10 years after it was launched. Last week, just ahead of JPM, Bancel pointed to one of the company’s clinical candidates as a potential blockbuster, (https://www.biospace.com/article/moderna-sees-potential-blockbuster-in-investigational-vaccine-for-disease-that-can-cause-birth-defects/) an experimental treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV), the most common infectious cause of birth defects in the United States.

Moderna said the analysis following a Phase I trial, which was taken after the third and final vaccination, shows continued boosting of neutralizing antibody titers in patients. The mRNA-based vaccine, mRNA-1647, is designed to protect against CMV infection. Cytomegalovirus is a common pathogen and is the leading infectious cause of birth defects in the United States with approximately 25,000 newborns in the U.S. infected every year. CMV is passed from the mother to her unborn child. Birth defects occur in about 20% of infected babies. The defects can include neurodevelopmental disabilities such as hearing loss, vision impairment, varying degrees of learning disability and decreased muscle strength and coordination. There is no approved vaccine to prevent CMV infection.

In October, the company received Fast Track Designation (https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/moderna-receives-fda-fast-track-designation-for-propionic-acidemia-program-mrna-3927-/) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for mRNA-3927, its investigational mRNA therapeutic for propionic acidemia, which is caused by the inability of the body to breakdown certain proteins and fats which leads to the build-up of toxic chemicals. Moderna plans to initiate an open-label, multi-center, dose-escalation Phase I/II study of multiple ascending doses of mRNA-3927 in primarily pediatric patients.

BioSpace source:

https://www.biospace.com/article/moderna-harnesses-the-power-of-amazon-web-services-to-develop-personalized-medicines

[onawah]

More from "Making Sense of the Madness" here:
Flu d'État:Infiltration, Not Invasion
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111213-The-planned-takedown-of-America-now--June-2020--in-full-swing.&p=1373570&viewfull=1#post1373570

[onawah]

The more I see from Dr. Robert Young, the more impressed I am, and convinced that he is correct.
See this post:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1372459&viewfull=1#post1372459
And his website:
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/air-pollution-poisoning-at-ground-zero-wuhan-china
All my life as an intuitive and extremely sensitive individual, I've felt (not just thought but FELT with ALL my senses) that the human race is destroying itself and the planet on countless fronts from chemicals to electromagnetic frequencies, to pollution of every imaginable kind, to the destruction of the environment and our relationship with Nature so on an on and on...
And now that it has all become so toxic that it's a wonder we can think and breathe at all, we are being told that a virus is the most dangerous thing in the world.
What a great diversion! And as history shows, TPTB have been planning this all along, so it's testimony to how well all the assaults have been working that so many people could be so easily deceived, when it hardly takes much digging at all to find out how they've never failed to spell out what their agenda has been.
But regardless of how people have been dumbed down, there are still none so blind as those who WILL NOT SEE...

And I can forgive this, because I still have not fully recovered from the crisis of faith I went through myself when I realized without a doubt that 911 was an inside job, and began jumping down a myriad of rabbit hole into a system of bewilderingly complex, inter-connected warrens.
It led not only to a vast change in my "belief system" but a change in my whole personality to the point where I have been and still am conducting an ongoing battle with cynicism, one that I wouldn't wish on anyone.
But my faith would be restored and I wouldn't feel so alone if enough people would just take the pill and wake up.
(We need someone to make a song that's the antithesis of this one:
uiz0Y619HTo
...and just as catchy...
I don't know if there is any other solution.
Maybe it's only the pioneers who have to go through that profound disillusionment, and the process for others can continue in stages that are not so earth-shattering.
I hope so, but it seems like timing is also all-important.
Wish I could just relax more and have faith the process will unfold as it should.
But this is still 3D reality, and nothing seems to be all that easy here....

Following is a sampling from Dr. Young's website:
"Air Pollution - A Primary Causation for the Symptoms of SARS - CORONAVIRUS 2, 17 and 19
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_0b1efcf6bdf14494af1eaaca8b72763e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_570,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_0b1efcf6bdf14494af1eaaca8b72763e~mv2.webp
NYC is among the smoggiest cities in the U.S. (AP Photo/Adam Rountree)
"Coronavirus is an invisible phantom so-called virus and therefore NOT contagious/infectious making vaccination totally useless and a contributing factor for chemical and biological poisoning!" Dr. Robert O Young
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_c009b19fafaa45deac428fed6b33022d~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_549,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_c009b19fafaa45deac428fed6b33022d~mv2.webp
Radiation & Chemical Poisoning Creates Black Crystals in the Intravascular Fluids
Many studies find that air pollution is the primary co-factor associated with the coronavirus. Research scientists stay politically safe by avoiding the short-term environmental acid air pollution trigger (short-term air pollution). They use the terms: "virus", "co-factor", and "long-term air pollution".[1 - 13]
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_f811848314c74ffa8ee390745c0f87cf~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_703,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_f811848314c74ffa8ee390745c0f87cf~mv2.webp
There are thirty-four epicenters listed below, sorted by death incidence. The table reveals that COVID-19 death incidence is proportional to the presence of fracking exhaust and an acidic poisoned earth plume. The major epicenters for acidic poisoning are at the top: Wuhan, China and the Tri-State Region (NY/NJ/CT), Louisiana, etc
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_64325f39931e492d8ca21c238bd1be29~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_674,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_64325f39931e492d8ca21c238bd1be29~mv2.webp
All sides agree that long-term air pollution poisoning that leads to hypoxia and pathological blood coagulation is a constant background stressor and a major contributor to acidic poisoning of the epicenters population. I have suggested that we need to set aside and dismantle the viral paradigm and adopt the terrain or environmental causation theory which can then be studied deeper for all acidic contributing factors that lead to the symptoms associated with the underlying causes.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_691fa884189540d1ac419861c598eabd~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_672,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_691fa884189540d1ac419861c598eabd~mv2.webp
A recent Harvard study finds that those vulnerable to the symptoms of the so-called "virus" are generated by long-term chemical poisoning from air pollution. A small increase in long-term exposure to PM2.5 leads to a large increase in the symptoms and death rate claimed to be caused by the phantom virus, COVID-19 … 1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 of hydrogen cyanide air pollution poisoning is associated with an 8% increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Once again, the increase in the COVID-19 death rate is due to chemical poisoning from air pollution and NOT from an invisible phantom virus. As you can see in the chart below hydrogen cyanide poisoning and its symptoms are identical to those claimed as an infectious virus now known as COVID-19 which has never been scientifically identified, isolated and cultured under Koch's postulates, validating its existence of so-called virus. [14]

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_1bdbc415c9874a32a1898d84fb52b90a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_446,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_1bdbc415c9874a32a1898d84fb52b90a~mv2.webp
Hydrogen Cyanide Poisoning Symptoms From Fracking are Identical to the So-Called COVID - 19 Virus [82-91]
A study from Tel Aviv University, describes the long-term NO2 or nitrogen dioxide air pollution poisoning component as a "most important contributor" to the COVID-19 pandemic. Once again, showing that the invisible phantom virus is NOT the cause of the symptoms listed above but are the result of acidic air pollution and earth plumes.

[NO2 (Nitrogen dioxide)] is one of the most obvious contributors to fatality caused by the COVID-19 virus in these regions and maybe across the whole world. [15]


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YECpQhR9cAA
Are Large Populations a Contributing Factor or Risk for Viral Infection

Air pollution has already been acknowledged by many researchers as a major cofactor for COVID-19 dis-ease. It has been suggested by some scientists that incidences are high in NYC because of the higher population density, and thus, social distancing of six feet, when not maintained will lead to more cases of COVID-19 infections..

A comparison of the five NYC boroughs refutes this theory of population density and therefore social distancing is NOT a common denominator in the increased infections. The boroughs listed below are all within a small geographical area, sharing a common environment in terms of above-ground and therefore subjected to acidic air pollution and earth plume poisoning.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_f7fdf4278c4c4397a4bf785a155a54c8~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_337,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_f7fdf4278c4c4397a4bf785a155a54c8~mv2.webp
It is important to note that Manhattan has the highest population density with the lowest incidence of the so-called phantom COVID-19 viral infections. The Bronx has half the population density of Manhattan with nearly twice the incidences.


It is also very important to point out that Manhattan has more people located on higher floors, away from earth pollution poisoning and earth plumes whereas the Bronx has more people located on lower floors near earth plume pollution. Finally, the Bronx is nearer to the newly installed upwind electric power plants which emits excessive amounts of air and electromagnetic pollution.

New York City - A City of Toxic Air Pollution and Earth Plumes

Metaphorically speaking, New York City is a petri dish of people who are vulnerable for being poisoned to death by the application of a dye of toxic fracked-fuel exhaust and NOT some invisible phantom. This is revealed in terms of their morbidity and mortality when looking at incidences and not cases determined by inconclusive and vague antibody or RTPCR testing.. "

continued

[onawah]

continued from above

"The four low stacks of the 14th Street Con Edison electric power plant (Manhattan) are across the East River and directly upwind from the Williamsburg epicenter. A few parts-per-million (ppm) chronic exposure to its exhaust components, such as Nitrogen dioxide and Hydrogen cyanide, can cause a wide variety of debilitating acidic symptoms, having nothing to do with a fake virus. "Beyond My Ken" [CC BY-SA 4.0)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_20cb9e6a9ee544f1835fb1e698b58c97~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_410,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_20cb9e6a9ee544f1835fb1e698b58c97~mv2.webp
Children and the elderly are the most vulnerable to acidic poisonous air pollution and earth plumes because children are still developing their immune systems and the elderly generally have compromised immune systems due to pre-existing conditions. "I was told by DOH officials that inspectors will NOT approve commercial day care permits near this power plant because it would be considered “co-located” and therefore “a condition that may expose children to environmental hazards”-Juan Pagán, Assembly Candidate


Aerial View of Con Edison or CONVID Edison

The four stacks of toxic acidic poisonous exhaust from the CONVID Edison power plant is rated at 736 megawatts. This approximates 85,000 carbon monoxide polluting automobiles cruising at 40 mph setting the stage for toxic acidic air pollution leading to the symptoms associated with the fake virus called COVID-19.

http://https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_923de3bfb27f4752b665b390c61284c8~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_459,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_923de3bfb27f4752b665b390c61284c8~mv2.webp

The following map shows the main epicenter of air pollution to the right circled (zip codes 11249, 11211), and a lesser epicenter of air pollution to the left circled (zip code 11205), both Williamsburg zip codes, where emergency vaccines and fines are mandated and a contributing factor to decompensated acidosis of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium. Blue squares designate the location of the toxic acidic power plants.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_fb8c09d151364157b7896b02c02d1c2f~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_669,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_fb8c09d151364157b7896b02c02d1c2f~mv2.webp

Toxic Acidic Air Pollution and Earth Plumes are the Cause and NOT an Invisible Phantom Virus! No Need to Social Distance!

Canadian epicenters provide another contradiction for those who believe population density supports the infectious disease paradigm. Vancouver, with the highest population density has very low COVID-19 incidence. North Montreal, with its lower population density, has the highest incidence of COVID-19 incidences. The difference between Vancouver and North Montreal is North Montreal is an environmental air pollution disaster, with many oil refineries nearby creating toxic acidic air pollution. No so-called infectious disease causing virus can be found but increased levels of Nitrogen Dioxide and Hydrogen Cyanide is found.


The distinguished medical scientist, Sucharit Bhakdi, states that viral causation is dubious, the common denominator is "horrid air pollution"[16] and the medical response to the pandemic is “grotesque, absurd and very dangerous.”[94,95]

http://https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_8dfe4f8f442e462e8f257e2ffc6081c8~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_424,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_8dfe4f8f442e462e8f257e2ffc6081c8~mv2.webp

“Trump Calls Coronavirus Democrats’ ‘New Hoax’' Accessed May 5, 2020
Dr. Deborah Birx, while representing the Federal Administration, inadvertently stated that deaths and disease are diagnosed as COVID-19 largely by mere association with a positive test result. That is knowing that the RTPCR testing is NOT disease specific and only tests antibodies which could be elevated for multiple reasons.


Representing COVID-19 largely by mere association with a positive antibody test as a "Case" is misleading, because cases are not well defined. A mere positive for an already ill person is NOT enough for a COVID-19 diagnosis. "Death" is more accurate, because death is more likely to be associated with definitive symptoms like a high fever or lung damage.

Cases and deaths are misleading, for example: NY Times, "Morning Briefing" (4/23/2020):

...the US outbreak... by far the world's largest...


All public information outlets should be using the word “incidence”.

Incidence reveals disease intensity, disease per population. It reveals patterns that point to toxic acidic chemical and/or radiation poisoning sources. For example, fracked fuel exhaust of nitrogen oxide or hydrogen cyanide poisoning correlates with deaths and deaths from chemical poisoning are incidences.


Incidences vs Cases

The US may have "the largest" numbers of so-called coronavirus cases (outside of China), but would be further down the list in terms of incidences. If US refinery epicenters were subtracted out of the cases, US incidences would be “the smallest” in the World.

New York City's so-called coronavirus incidences is much higher than US incidence. Therefore, what is different about New York City?

MASSIVE ACIDIC EARTH & AIR POLLUTION
http://https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_7011a44fca934c3d9c62e430c82d70e3~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_413,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_7011a44fca934c3d9c62e430c82d70e3~mv2.webp
Mass Acidic Chemical Poisoning from Nitrogen Oxide and Hydrogen Cyanide Coupled with Radiation Poisoning in Manhattan, New York.
The above map is a great contribution in support of death by acidic chemical and radioactive poisoning and NOT from a phantom virus called Coronavirus COVID-19. Maps of disease incidence are the best indicators of acidic chemical and radiation pollution, and for that reason, the NYC Departments of Health is not allowed to provide detailed epidemiological maps. They, however, state that the reason is patient privacy. But such data could be omitted or anonymized for the purposes of determining the actual number of incidences caused by acidic chemical and radiation poisoning or from the phantom Coronavirus COVID-19.

http://https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_542e2f66459c4acb8c5bfda9c9f7029a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_378,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_542e2f66459c4acb8c5bfda9c9f7029a~mv2.webp

Epicenter for Mass Acidic 5G Radiation Poisoning in New York City, New York [94]
Even in the mainstream, the fake virus and infectious-believing World, a "case" is not necessarily the disease, and any COVID-19 disease is not necessarily due to the CORONAVIRUS-COVID-19!
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_2e0be4c77de14b308ebbf14f4791a456~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_488,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_2e0be4c77de14b308ebbf14f4791a456~mv2.webp
Dr. Deborah Birx, inadvertently stated that deaths and disease are diagnosed as COVID-19 largely by mere association
Conclusion

ACIDIC toxic air pollution or 'Acid Rain' contributes to 9% of all deaths globally – this varies from 2% to 15% by country compared to the so-called phantom Coronavirus, CONVID-19 of .02% to .05% which is caused by chemical and radiation poisoning.

The REAL PANDEMIC BASED ON INCIDENCES!
http://https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_280e8795ded04cb9803499e627b7502d~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_504,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_280e8795ded04cb9803499e627b7502d~mv2.webp
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fbbf2b_63b7af92aa6843e487d508a3378f9f25~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_740,h_498,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/fbbf2b_63b7af92aa6843e487d508a3378f9f25~mv2.webp
Thus, the advertised and media marketed plandemic is, to an unknown degree, a fraudemic of testing. Yet, from the standpoint of the chemical and radiation acidic poisoning thesis, there is a real acidic chemical and radiation pollution pandemic, of which the test(s) would be measuring residual biological matter (fragmented genetic matter) caused by radioactive and chemical exposure and an activated immune response (falsely interpreted as COVID-19 antibodies)!


In other words, real scientific evidence that can be quantified and then analyzed and does NOT require YOU to exercise your faith to believe in a phantom virus called COVID-19 - based upon a fake science called virology which only exists as a concept on a piece of paper! [96][97][98][99][100][101]

Hopefully, it is NOW clearer to you that the purpose for the Coronavirus CONVID-19 Plandemic is NOT about Public Health! So what is it about? What do YOU Think! Power? Money? Population Control?"

(Then a very long list of References which in itself contains a huge amount of information including images and videos, and then links to more articles, such as: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/singapore-s-corona-effect-covid-19-case-fatality-rate-is-remarkably-low-why
and
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-trojan-horse-viral-theory

Gratitude to Dr. Young! :sun: :nod: )

[greybeard]

Unlicensed does not mean untested!!!

This highlights the rush to vaccinate people with out the "product" being licensed
The UK law being changed to allow this.
Also about the tests being very unreliable.
This is American news.
The video well worth watching.
Chris


https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-31st-august-2020

[greybeard]

What is the WHO? - Questions For Corbett


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAZ9KCNDSek

This is excellent if you have the time to listen to facts
There is so much info now confirming that we have been lied to for a very long time that its a question of being selective in what you watch.
I watched about half of it and it is well presented with screen shots of documents etc.
Chris

[Delight]

This day is the only day we have to act for our well being. Those still fighting the virus face the wrong direction. I no longer feel I have to say IMO.

I request from the Universe that any people who think we must be afraid of viral infection be REASSURED. I humbly request from the Universe that those who doubt that this issue is the planned take down of our LIVES be made aware! I assert that if there IS a creative force on whom we may call, we be assisted with the strength to fight for our ability to freely move, freely breathe, freely speak, freely act, freely take in nutrition and access natural support for life.

So Be It

I am cross posting this one.


Dispatches from the War: the killing fields of New York; putting Cuomo and Trump on notice; memo to Dr. Scott Atlas
by Jon Rappoport
8/31/20
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/08/31/killing-fields-of-new-york-putting-cuomo-and-trump-on-notice/

"Note: this is a re-publication of an article I wrote several months ago. The subject has dropped off the radar. I’m bringing it back. Nothing has been done to remedy the tragedy and the crimes detailed below.

BREAKING UPDATE—GreenMedInfo and GatewayPundit are reporting the CDC has quietly revised its COVID US death numbers. Instead of 161,000 deaths, the actual number is less than 10,000, in the category of “died from the virus and no other causes.”

GreenMedInfo: “The implications of this are jaw-dropping, confirming what so many of us have been saying for months, namely, the death stats have been overinflated, likely by several orders of magnitude. The CDC surreptitiously updated their COVID death statistics on August 26th, with astounding implications, namely, less than 10k of the 161k people the CDC has said ‘died from COVID’ were classified as having been killed by COVID-19 alone. The rest had 2-3 additional causes of death, the vast majority of which were chronic diseases indicative of poor health which long pre-existed this event. Sources:”

www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/#Comorbidities

data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Conditions-contributing-to-deaths-involving-corona/hk9y-quqm

A study from the Journal of the American Medical Association Network delivers stunning numbers that should make you stop in your tracks—

JAMA Network, April 22, 2020, “Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area”:

“Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively.”

Well, of course, the people who were put on breathing ventilators were the most ill patients to begin with, right? That’s an unwarranted assumption. And only medical lunatics would continue to apply ANY treatment to a defined group with the staggering kill-rates quoted in the study.

A close and trusted researcher has told me the following: many older people live with chronically low oxygen levels. This may not be ideal, but they survive.

However, when such people arrive at hospitals, doctors can misinterpret the oxygen levels, believing these are dire emergency situations—and therefore, they sedate the patients and put them on ventilators. The patients die.

Then there is money. Insurance money. In a phone interview, physician and Minnesota state senator, Scott Jensen, told me that hospitals, who are suffering very deep financial losses, are incentivized by Medicare to label as many patients as possible “COVID-19,” and to put them on ventilators.

Jensen stated that a patient on Medicare, diagnosed with straight pneumonia, would bring a $4600 payment to the hospital. The same patient, labeled “COVID-19 pneumonia,” would bring $13,000. And if that patient is put on a ventilator: $39,000.

Result? Patients unnecessarily and murderously put on ventilators.

In New York, there are many elderly and very ill people, suffering from long-term conditions that have nothing to do with an epidemic. They have been treated for years with toxic drugs and toxic vaccines. They already have lung problems. Massive propaganda about the COVID virus terrifies them. They believe they might be “infected.” Then they ARE diagnosed with COVID, isolated from family and friends, and they they give up and die. Prematurely. Their deaths are BROUGHT ON AND FORCED by the COVID diagnosis and the isolation. And, in many instances, by ventilators.

NO VIRUS NEEDED.

These old people? Using worldometers.info for data, as of May 13, those 65 and older account for an astonishing 73.6 percent of all COVID deaths in New York.

The 75 and older group accounts, all on its own, for 48.7 percent of all COVID deaths in the city.

NO VIRUS NEEDED.

There is more to say about the issue of hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood of patients). A number of patients in New York have mystified ER doctors because they show up with this condition.

WebMD lists a number of obvious causes for hypoxia: asthma attack; trauma (injury); COPD; emphysema; bronchitis; pain medicines, “and other drugs that hold back breathing”; heart problems; anemia, “a low number of red blood cells, which carry oxygen.”

Among the drugs that can cause the oxygen deprivation known as hypoxia? From drugabuse.com: “…opiate [opioid] drugs also slow your breathing…and in case of an overdose, your breathing is slowed to a virtually non-existent and lethal level.”

Is anyone looking into THAT, in New York?

More from drugabuse.com: “In the U.S., a whopping 44 people die each and every day as a result of respiratory arrest brought on by prescription opioid overdose. The opioids depress your breathing, bring on heavy sedation and make it impossible to wake up. What’s more, the opioids found in painkillers are the same ones found in heroin, which caused over 8,000 overdose deaths in 2013.”

2018 estimate of deaths from opioid overdoses in New York: 3000. Many more people in the New York area are addicted to these drugs. In New York State, in 2017, the number of people discharged from hospitals, after treatment for opioid overdose or dependency: 25,000.

In 2020, people who have developed opioid hypoxia are misdiagnosed with “COVID-19 lung problems.” Some of these people would be sedated further, put on ventilators—ignoring the need to deal with their overdose, their addiction, their withdrawal—and they die.

New York City, opioids, heroin, severe breathing problems, hypoxia, ventilators with sedation, death.

None of this requires the existence or transmission of a purported coronavirus.

And hypoxia can be alleviated with oxygen delivered through means other than ventilators.

Of course, the governor of New York, Cuomo, has opted to order tens of thousands of ventilators for his State, in order to “save lives.”

Trump, too, has taken emergency action to produce and provide more ventilators for America. Make death great again."

SOURCES:

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765184

nypost.com/2020/04/06/nyc-doctor-says-coronavirus-ventilator-settings-are-too-high/

www.cdc.gov/sars/about/faq.html

www.webmd.com/asthma/guide/hypoxia-hypoxemia#1

drugabuse.com/take-my-breath-away-a-deadly-warning-about-opiates/

www.medscape.com/viewarticle/922932

www.health.ny.gov/statistics/opioid/data/pdf/nys_opioid_annual_report_2019.pdf

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/12/state-senator-and-doctor-exposes-medicare-payouts-for-covid-19-patients/

www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

And this one


Weird science: Covid-19 does NOT cause heart damage, as blockbuster study had basic calculation errors (https://www.rt.com/op-ed/499357-science-covid-19-heart-damage/)

By Peter Andrews
28 Aug, 2020 18:11
Get short URL (https://on.rt.com/apb1)


https://cdni.rt.com/files/2020.08/xxs/5f49346085f540654c2f2c85.jpg
FILE PHOTO: Health officials check tomography datas displaying Covid-19 symptoms on lungs and the overall damage of the virus to the body received with radiological testing method at a state hospital in Moscow, Russia on May 22, 2020 © Getty Images / Sefa Karacan / Anadolu Agency


A widely circulated scientific study reported that Covid-19 causes long-term heart problems. Its authors have been forced to issue major corrections after they wildly miscalculated the risk, but the damage has already been done.

The scientific establishment wields a lot of power these days. The emergence of the novel coronavirus has elevated many career scientists and academics to positions of great influence, acting as advisors and commissars to governments on all things Covid-related. Which, it turns out, is everything. That is why it is so important that they conduct rational, unbiased research, and analyse all findings with great scepticism, taking nothing for granted.

[B]Weird science
Alas, that was never going to happen. Unless you follow the right Twitter accounts (such as Alex Berenson (https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1298631105998917632) who has been indefatigable in his criticism of shoddy Covid-19 ‘science’), you won’t read about this anywhere else. But what should be a pretty big scandal resulting in a major inquiry into publishing practices is currently underway in the field of cardiology.

Just over a month ago, a paper (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2768916) from Germany entitled, ‘Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)’, was published in the journal JAMA Cardiology. It was based on 100 people recently recovered from Covid-19, who underwent MRI scans to find factors associated with damage to their hearts.

The article quickly became a smash hit, going viral, inasmuch as academic research can. It racked up hundreds of thousands of interactions on its Altmetric score (https://jamanetwork.altmetric.com/details/86606550), a tool that tracks how much a piece of research is being clicked, shared and talked about online. No doubt, this was owing to the paper’s bombshell conclusions. If Covid-19 was strongly linked to long-lasting heart disease in a significant proportion of those who survive it, that would be a hugely important thing to know.

A comedy of errors
The only problem with the conclusion of the paper is that almost every piece of data given to support it was wrong. As more and more media breathlessly reported that Covid-19 will eventually kill everyone with heart attacks, the mathematically minded on Twitter – including Darrel Francis, a Professor of Cardiology at the National Heart and Lung Institute – began to point out (https://twitter.com/ProfDFrancis/status/1288246926392070145) obvious miscalculations and mismatches in the results of the study.

The authors appeared to confuse medians for means, and data points present in the graphs were absent elsewhere. In essence, the paper was riddled with remedial mistakes that the first few hundreds of thousands of people who read it (or scan the last few sentences) failed to notice.

But Professor Francis is still not happy with the reissued article, launching another scathing attack on his Twitter account. He has more than the layman’s knowledge of statistics, but he lays out (https://twitter.com/ProfDFrancis/status/1298499595056668673) in no uncertain terms that the authors are still, even after their extraordinary climb down, fudging the numbers. He is adamant that the corrected figures show that while people who have recovered from Covid-19 do show markers of heart disease in their MRI scans, so do people of similar health profiles who have not had the virus. That is, Covid-19 had absolutely nothing to do with the heart damage seen in the people in the study.

The authors of the study, meanwhile, have not taken kindly to the egg on their faces. They have lashed out at Twitter’s dismantling of their less-accredited math skills, (not sure people outside UK will know what these are) griping (https://www.tctmd.com/news/signs-cardiac-damage-even-younger-nonhospitalized-covid-19-patients) that a letter to the editor “would indeed be more appropriate.” It only took them a month to correct their substandard article, but by that point the damage was done. Just the other day I actually had someone casually inform me that “Covid causes heart damage.” Clearly the study’s reach has been wide. Whether its debunking will have as wide a reach remains to be seen.

[Goba]

Funny (I think)

I whatsapped it to all my friends who are "on the fence"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0y6M-N8wOE

[rgray222]

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/117807358_10158455761753168_2995701454811125590_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=Fbm1nU33cv8AX_PM_A5&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&tp=7&oh=a01d7fe5a8edfa15cb02880c278df89a&oe=5F764534

[pueblo]

So the Moderna (Bil Gates) vaccine, which is an mRNA vaccine uses a delivery system (enzyme) which is called LUCIFERASE!!


"Human 2.0"? A Wake-Up Call To The World

Dr. Carrie Madej

ywuCRVJVDqs

[Gwin Ru]

...




1302642903215374337
(click on picture for larger size)



Largest size:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EhPqz37WsAEqld4?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

[onawah]

Close to 1000 German doctors speaking out against their governments and WHOs official narrative. Doctors around the world joining their movement. https://twitter.com/i/status/1297426585621090304

[Zanshin]

A prepackaged, gene altering, vaccine out of Moderna - first CEO Faucci - Cornell room mate of Gates.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/H4qY50IpAf0c/

post edit: I'm unsure if this clip embedded properly - my first attempt at bitchute embed

Clip source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/H4qY50IpAf0c/

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Heads up Ohio - worrying development to keep an eye on:

https://twitter.com/Mareq16/status/1302590690329800704


https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/in-the-middle-of-the-night-governor-mike-dewine-signed-an-order-creating-fema-camps-for-asymptomatic-covid-patients/

[Gwin Ru]

...

Bill and Melinda Gates ready to launch their "Prêt-à-porter" Fall collection of tailor made enhanced meat suits:


Mode-RNA


... it's all in the name your face...

[Gwin Ru]

Moderna patent revision of March 2019 revealed impending coronavirus release (http://www.richardpresser.com/wordpress/moderna-patent-revision-of-march-2019-revealed-impending-coronavirus-release/)

Richard Presser (http://www.richardpresser.com/wordpress/author/richard-presser/)
September 8, 2020 (http://www.richardpresser.com/wordpress/moderna-patent-revision-of-march-2019-revealed-impending-coronavirus-release/)

On March 28, 2019, Moderna, the poster child of the mRNA supposed vaccine, lodged an amendment (https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2019/0240317.html) to a previously multi-rejected patent. Included in that amendment were the following words:
Because of a concern for re-emergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated.
These words and other factors indicate Moderna was aware of the planned release of the weaponised SARS-COV-2.

This revelation is one of many shared by Dr. David Martin in his interview with Brian Rose (https://freedomplatform.tv/david-e-martin-exposing-moderna-the-star-of-plandemic-indoctrination-reveals-the-truth/) a few hours ago. This 2-hour interview pulls no punches. David reveals many of the connections behind the scenes, including to Fauci and Gates, and that many if not all of Moderna’s patent applications are illegal.

A condensed version of the key information about the Moderna patent application is contained in David’s similarly timed interview (https://youtu.be/msykwjpwG6Q) with Ben Swann (backup interview copy here (http://reference.covid-19-s.cam/Covid%20Vaccine%20Patent%20Warned%20of%20Deliberate%20Coronavirus%20Release.mp4)).

This story is becoming more threadbare by the day. And if the stars align, this entire psyop will soon blow up in their faces – as it is destined to do.


Richard

msykwjpwG6Q

[pueblo]

...

Bill and Melinda Gates ready to launch their "Prêt-à-porter" Fall collection of tailor made enhanced meat suits:


Mode-RNA



... it's all in the name your face...




"Embrace the 'New You' with our exciting new range of exclusive designer jeans. sorry genes."

[pueblo]

They are now laying the groundwork for another important piece of the agenda puzzle.


"Boris Johnson's 'moonshot' mass testing regime to try and get life back to normal will cost £100 billion, a leaked memo says.

The radical government plans could see up to 10 million coronavirus tests carried out every day by early next year in a drastic expansion of the existing programme.

It comes after the Prime Minister yesterday effectively put Christmas celebrations on hold, as he warned that draconian new restrictions on gatherings of more than six people could be here for months - while chief medical officer Chris Whitty pointed the finger at 'Generation Z' for sparking a surge in cases.

Digital immunity passports for those who test negative would also be rolled out to allow safe travel, a return to work and other activities"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8715817/PM-plans-spend-entire-NHS-budget-bid-test-Briton-week.html

[Arcturian108]

A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PSHrde1ooc

Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.

[pueblo]

A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PSHrde1ooc

Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.

Hi Arcturian, this has been fairly well debunked by Bill in this thread http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1376224&viewfull=1#post1376224

[Arcturian108]

A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PSHrde1ooc

Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.

Hi Arcturian, this has been fairly well debunked by Bill in this thread http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1376224&viewfull=1#post1376224

Not sure if Bill was right in his assessment, as I believe the original site was scrubbed after this screen shot taken in the video was saved.

[pueblo]

A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PSHrde1ooc

Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.

Hi Arcturian, this has been fairly well debunked by Bill in this thread http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1376224&viewfull=1#post1376224

Not sure if Bill was right in his assessment, as I believe the original site was scrubbed after this screen shot taken in the video was saved.

Yes, but how do you explain the large range of years (not just 2018) going back as far as 2002 IIRC?

[Gwin Ru]

If one looks somewhat attentively, one would notice that the "Product Code" is still the same: 902780

from Jim Stone:
BOOOM: WTA HAS A MISHAP:

Covid 19 test kits ordered in 2018 AND THEN THEY SCREWED UP THEIR COVERUP!!! I came across this a couple days ago and it had been "debunked" as a database error.

I posted this and removed it. But then I started thinking: No proof was offered stating that this was any sort of database error; what had in fact been done is that once this got discovered, the WTA suddenly generated an identical page for 2019 and 2017, when originally there was only a 2018 page that worked with THIS LINK, (https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/902780) WHICH NOW GOES TO A GENERIC MEDICAL KIT. HA HA HA THOSE DUFUSES,DID THEY REALLY THINK I'D FORGET AND QUIT WATCHING???? If there was nothing to this, why did they not leave it alone? Why did they have to remove all references to Covid-19? Here is what obviously happened: Since they were clearly and plainly busted, they faked a database error by generating duplicate pages with one number different in the page name that made it look like whatever year you typed, this came up. I figured that if they did that, I'd bust them later, and I SUCCEEDED. THEY ARE BUSTED.
---------------------------------------------------------

If this goes back to 2002, it may mean that that thing was in the works since the SARS outbreak?

[mountain_jim]

NEW: Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who fled to the United States after claiming Beijing covered up COVID-19, vows to publish evidence proving the virus is manmade.


(quote above did not come with link, but found this video which was uploaded today, watching now, and yes she states the above in this video)

WOiBLEKvKus

[Gwin Ru]

Author of Dystopian Classics Predicted Face Masks to Enforce Conformity 70 Years Ago (https://summit.news/2020/09/11/author-of-dystopian-classics-predicted-face-masks-to-enforce-conformity-70-years-ago/)


Ernst Jünger said masks would become commonplace to eradicate individuality.


Paul Joseph Watson (https://summit.news/author/pjw/)
Published
11 September, 2020


https://cdn.summit.news/2020/09/110920mask.jpg
TOLGA AKMEN/Getty Images


Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago.

With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “new normal,” the enforcement measures to make people wear them, by both agents of the state and members of the general public, are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian.

This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic.

As Thomas Crew details in his article The Dystopian Age of the Mask (https://thecritic.co.uk/the-dystopian-age-of-the-mask/), the “eradication of all individuality” is a running theme of all dystopian literature.

This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as, “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.”

Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger’s The Worker, where, “The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the sudden proliferation of the mask in contemporary society.”

“It is no coincidence,” he writes, “that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life. It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask, with which they are trying to equip entire populations; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds, seen on every racing driver; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation, explosions, or narcotic substances. We can assume”, he continues, with an eerie prescience, “that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.”

Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life, no matter how stifled, atomized and undignified it may be, is the only consideration.
“Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020, across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger had in mind. Our readiness to obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that, for Jünger, underlie the modern period. It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War. Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy, the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object. Everything “non-essential” – everything, that is, that makes us human – is blithely discarded.”
As we document in the video below, the level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing.

A cowed public, whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience, will do it for them.

AA6_GuZOyAI

[Gwin Ru]

Gilead Sent Death Threats To Kill HCQ As COVID-19 Cure, French Dr Testifies In Parliament (https://greatgameindia.com/gilead-death-threats-hcq/)

August 2, 2020

After it was revealed in a shocking investigation that WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine were based on a fake study (https://greatgameindia.com/pornstar-sci-fi-writer-influenced-who-policies/) by a pornstar and a science-fiction writer, now in an ongoing investigation, a French doctor has testified in parliament that Gilead sent him death threats (https://greatgameindia.com/gilead-death-threats-hcq/) after he started talking about HCQ as a cure for COVID-19.


https://greatgameindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Gilead-Sent-Death-Threats-To-Kill-HCQ-As-Cure-For-COVID-19-French-Dr-Testifies-In-Parliament.jpg.webp
Gilead Sent Death Threats To Kill HCQ As COVID-19 Cure, French Dr Testifies In Parliament



In late March, a study by a French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult revealed that he was able to cure his 80 patients by administering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.


“By administering hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, we were able to observe an improvement in all cases, except in one patient who arrived with an advanced form, who was over the age of 86…,” reported Fox News.

https://greatgameindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dr-Didier-Raoult-cure-patients-with-Hydroxychloroquine.jpg.webp
In late March, a study by a French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult revealed that he was able to cure his 80 patients by administering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.


They were also able to demonstrate 91% effectiveness in more than 1,000 patients with zero side-effects.


RexUJeWmzSE

In his tweets Dr. Raoult explained about his results:
New article published online by my teams: in vitro demonstration of the hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin synergy to counter SARS-COV2 replication In vitro testing of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 shows synergistic effect.

1243646733088968705
New results from the IHU Méditerranée Infection: 80 patients treated with a hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin combination.

Our two articles published this evening allow us to continue to demonstrate:
1. The effectiveness of our protocol, on 80 patients.

2. The relevance of the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, thanks to research carried out in our P3 containment laboratory.

1243651596808003587

Soon, Dr. Didier Raoult started receiving death threats. He filed a complaint (https://www.20minutes.fr/justice/2748543-20200326-nantes-enquete-ouverte-parquet-apres-menaces-mort-contre-professeur-raoult) for “death threats” and “acts of intimidation against a public service official” following which an investigation was opened by French Judiciary.

Now during a shocking testimony before the parliament, Dr. Raoult told lawmakers under oath that the person who sent him death threats was a top recipient of Gilead Pharmaceuticals.
Professor Raoult testified that, shortly after he started to talk about HCQ as a treatment, in March, he received anonymous death threats. He filed a complaint with the police, and an inquiry was opened by the French judiciary.

The medical doctor behind the threats was found and happens to be from a Nantes university hospital. It happened to be the person who received the most money from Gilead over the past 6 years.
Professor Raoult told members of the French parliament to open an investigation into Gilead Sciences. He also mentioned the stock exchange speculation that took place in connection with information becoming available regarding Remdesivir and HCQ. You can watch the entire testimony of Dr. Didier Raoul presented to the French Parliament on Wednesday June 24, here (http://videos.assemblee-nationale.fr/video.9246134_5ef34c84c2728.impact-gestion-et-consequences-de-l-epidemie-de-coronavirus-covid-19--m-didier-houssin-ancien-di-24-juin-2020).


1290556336854441985

Earlier, in an investigation it was revealed that WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine were influenced by a fake study (https://greatgameindia.com/pornstar-sci-fi-writer-influenced-who-policies/) by a pornstar and a Sci-Fi writer. An obscure US healthcare analytics company has come under sharp scrutiny for the integrity of its key studies that were published in some of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. World Health Organization and several national governments changed their COVID-19 policies and treatment based on the faulty data provided by the company with a pornstar and a sci-fi writer on their payroll.

A report by GreatGameIndia (https://greatgameindia.com/) on the history of Gilead Sciences revealed that behind the benign image of a vaccine manufacturer, Gilead Science has a dark history of allegations of bioterrorism (https://greatgameindia.com/gilead-sciences-the-coronavirus-vaccine-manufacturer-accused-of-bioterrorism/), including having Pentagon to bomb a competitors factory under the false pretext of association with Al-Qaeda.


1287440065988382720

Gilead’s flu drug, Tamiflu, originally manufactured by Gilead Sciences, was criticized for being ineffective and even harmful (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2006/jan/19/health.birdflu). Chairman of Gilead Sciences Donald Rumsfeld and Board Member of Gilead, Former U.S. Secretary of State, George Schultz profited heavily from a $1.5 billion stockpiling by the U.S. government (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/12/the-truth-about-tamiflu/307801/) on Tamiflu leading up to the 2009 H1N1 “swine flu” outbreak.

The interesting part is, Gilead was part of the vaccine lobby at whose behest the WHO faked the H1N1 pandemic (https://greatgameindia.com/who-vaccine-industry/) in 2009, and kept it a secret from people until committees were setup which exposed the entire racket.

[Franny]

Oh my, do look at the three images in the post, the agenda could not be more clear. In your face with a slap.

The time to abolish the family image does not seem to be government sponsored but the other two do look to be connected.

1305725962982772736

[Gwin Ru]

...

goYQAQv_AEg

[araucaria]

Author of Dystopian Classics Predicted Face Masks to Enforce Conformity 70 Years Ago (https://summit.news/2020/09/11/author-of-dystopian-classics-predicted-face-masks-to-enforce-conformity-70-years-ago/)


Ernst Jünger said masks would become commonplace to eradicate individuality.


Paul Joseph Watson (https://summit.news/author/pjw/)
Published
11 September, 2020


https://cdn.summit.news/2020/09/110920mask.jpg
TOLGA AKMEN/Getty Images


Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago.

With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “new normal,” the enforcement measures to make people wear them, by both agents of the state and members of the general public, are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian.

This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic.

As Thomas Crew details in his article The Dystopian Age of the Mask (https://thecritic.co.uk/the-dystopian-age-of-the-mask/), the “eradication of all individuality” is a running theme of all dystopian literature.

This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as, “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.”

Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger’s The Worker, where, “The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the sudden proliferation of the mask in contemporary society.”

“It is no coincidence,” he writes, “that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life. It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask, with which they are trying to equip entire populations; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds, seen on every racing driver; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation, explosions, or narcotic substances. We can assume”, he continues, with an eerie prescience, “that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.”

Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life, no matter how stifled, atomized and undignified it may be, is the only consideration.
“Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020, across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger had in mind. Our readiness to obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that, for Jünger, underlie the modern period. It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War. Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy, the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object. Everything “non-essential” – everything, that is, that makes us human – is blithely discarded.”
As we document in the video below, the level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing.

A cowed public, whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience, will do it for them.
(…)
[/CENTER]

Only yesterday, I was quoting GK Chesterton saying very much the same thing at around the same time. See this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111979-Scientific-Materialism-versus-Truth&p=1378204&viewfull=1#post1378204). Let me add the following quote from the same source:

In Manalive, the enemy of sanity is not a conspiracy without substance. It is the ‘real world’, the habitual, mundane matter-of-fact life of Dr Warner and Moses Gould. There is a very real possibility that a truly sane man runs a risk of being certified as a lunatic in a world becoming increasingly crazy. Chesterton’s political disillusionment (1906-14) has a bearing on the pursuit of sanity. In ‘The Mad Official’ published in the Daily News in 1912, he raised the connection between routine and madness in societies and individuals. There are peoples who have lost their power of astonishment at their own actions and ‘one of the countries is modern England’.

There is something slightly reassuring in noting to what extent these issues are not new. The human disease is a chronic one, not the acute and probably terminal case many are saying. A cure may yet be found, but only if the patient is not overly attached to his condition.

[Gwin Ru]

State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case (https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/state-by-state-breakdown-of-federal-aid-per-covid-19-case.html)

By Ayla Ellison (Twitter (https://twitter.com/@AylaEllison)) -

Tuesday, April 14th, 2020

HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Some of the states hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic will receive less funding than states touched relatively lightly, according to an analysis by Kaiser Health News (https://khn.org/news/furor-erupts-billions-going-to-hospitals-based-on-medicare-billings-not-covid-19/).

The first round of grants will be distributed based on historical share Medicare revenue, not based on COVID-19 burden. Therefore, hard-hit states like New York will receive far less per COVID-19 case than most other states.

HHS said it doled out the first slice of funding based on Medicare revenue to get support to hospitals as quickly as possible. The agency said (https://www.hhs.gov/provider-relief/index.html) the next round of grants "will focus on providers in areas particularly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak," rural hospitals and other healthcare providers that receive much of their revenues from Medicaid.

Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.

Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case
Alaska
$306,000
Arizona
$23,000
Arkansas
$285,000
California
$145,000
Colorado
$58,000
Connecticut
$38,000
Delaware
$127,000
District of Columbia
$56,000
Florida
$132,000
Georgia
$73,000
Hawaii
$301,000
Idaho
$100,000
Illinois
$73,000
Indiana
$105,000
Iowa
$235,000
Kansas
$291,000
Kentucky
$297,000
Louisiana
$26,000
Maine
$260,000
Maryland
$120,000
Massachusetts
$44,000
Michigan
$44,000
Minnesota
$380,000
Mississippi
$166,000
Missouri
$175,000
Montana
$315,000
Nebraska
$379,000
Nevada
$98,000
New Hampshire
$201,000
New Jersey
$18,000
New Mexico
$171,000
New York
$12,000
North Carolina
$252,000
North Dakota
$339,000
Ohio
$180,000
Oklahoma
$291,000
Oregon
$220,000
Pennsylvania
$68,000
Rhode Island
$52,000
South Carolina
$186,000
South Dakota
$241,000
Tennessee
$166,000
Texas
$184,000
Utah
$94,000
Vermont
$87,000
Virginia
$201,000
Washington
$58,000
West Virginia
$471,000
Wisconsin
$163,000
Wyoming
$278,000


More articles on healthcare finance:


Kansas hospital closes under pressure from COVID-19 (https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/kansas-hospital-closes-under-pressure-from-covid-19.html)



CMS pitches 3 payment rules for 2021: 5 things to know (https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/cms-pitches-3-payment-rules-for-2021-5-things-to-know.html)



Rural America braces for COVID-19 as more hospitals close (https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/rural-america-braces-for-covid-19-as-more-hospitals-close.html)

[Gwin Ru]

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dr-Carrie-Madej-300x169.jpg (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=213564)


What the END GAME of this Entire “EVENT” Actually is. (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=213564) 1:05:44

By wmw_admin (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?author=1) on September 15, 2020

Richie From Boston talks to Dr Carrie Madej about the ultimate, and very sinister objective behind the Covid-19 vaccine.


WEUDyKiR6pIF

[Gwin Ru]

This is getting weirder and weirder...

Taking into account the Cs' intel, the original Covid/SARs-Cov2 started with a research on a vaccine designed to turn the vaccinated into zombies/ PLFs (Programmable Life Forms) /OPs (Organic Portals). But something went wrong and THAT vaccine had unwanted (to their expected final results) side effects and escaped into the general population:


So, it seems that the idea of manufacturing psychopaths via "medicine" was in the ether from at least the early part of the 20th century.

If so, then, this communication from Laura Knight-Jadczyk's "Cs" makes a lot more sense:

Session 21 March 2020 (https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/session-21-march-2020.48488/)

A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".

Q: (L) So they need to stop that which they have created because in some cases, it does the opposite of what they wanted it to do?

A: Yes and this is the interesting factor: The virus can change DNA making individuals more susceptible to cosmic information of the STO variety. It can also enhance and activate long suppressed codons of a beneficial nature. So you can see why they are so desperate to halt the spread.
... and now for that very weird part, from Jim Stone:
"They have killed God. I can't feel God anymore" - Second whistleblower to Coronavirus vax (http://82.221.129.208/.vd5.html)

This is from Hal Turner. And I believe it, after all these types of vaxxes have been in development for 20 years

From Hal Turner: (https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/they-ve-killed-god-i-can-t-feel-god-my-soul-is-dead-astrazeneca-halts-covid-19-vaccine-trials-after-second-volunteer-develops-neurological-problems)
"AstraZeneca revealed details of its large coronavirus vaccine trials on Saturday, the third in a wave of rare disclosures by drug companies under pressure to be more transparent about how they are testing products that are the world's best hope for ending the pandemic.
The release comes after a second vaccine test volunteer "Developed neurological problems."

According to sources who claim to be familiar with the vaccine trials, the second volunteer suddenly started saying:

"They've killed God; I can't feel God anymore - my Soul is dead"
after the vaccine.

Polls are finding Americans increasingly wary of accepting a coronavirus vaccine. And scientists inside and outside the government are worried that regulators, pressured by the president for results before Election Day on Nov. 3, might release an unproven or unsafe vaccine.

Jim's comment: IF YOU SUBMIT TO THAT VAX, YOUR BRAIN IS DEAD. Obviously it is not as advertised, this does not surprise me AT ALL.
... artistic intuition:

https://www.sott.net/image/s29/583731/medium/Bill_Gates_Murals_Lushux.jpg (https://www.sott.net/pic-of-day/583731)



So, indeed, it is a spiritual battle that the deep state/shadow government hope to win by disconnecting the spirituo-biological radio/TV antennas embedded in humans' DNA.

[happyuk]

When it comes to Covid, common sense in the UK has gone down the toilet as ministers keep changing policy on a whim.

Thousands of Brits were forced to leg it home from France for no apparent reason. Large swathes of France have lower infection rates than Lancashire, so why not distinguish between regions?

Why are travellers from low-risk Bretagne threatened with quarantine when those from high-risk Catalonia are not?

Worse of all, these panic-driven knee-jerk reactions keep hampering the economic recovery the UK desperately needs

[greybeard]

Student anger and frustration as thousands forced into university lockdown - BBC News


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSvI6f0_rVQ

The agenda is promote fear

look at the video below --not noticed by the media of course.
Chris


Paul Weston - This One Covid Lie Will Bring Down The British Government


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06yja21V7xg&feature=youtu.be

[onawah]

Inside Scoop on COVID Pandemic
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
September 30, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/09/30/inside-scoop-on-covid-pandemic.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art2ReadMore&cid=20200930Z1&mid=DM667052&rid=976501988

kB0MEjHgkfM


THE JAB: Featuring GlaxoSmithKline
48,417 views•Aug 27, 2020Children's Health Defense
24K subscribers
It’s deja-vu all over again with the W.H.O. declaring “pandemics” that result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies who swoop in with vaccines to save the day. But are they actually saving anyone? Or do serious adverse events such as the very real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu “pandemic” of 2009—which many researchers tie to GSK’s Pandemrix—counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines? The Jab breaks down what happened in 2009 and why it’s critical that we understand this today.

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., created “The Jab” video, which highlights the gold rush that occurred for pharmaceutical companies when the World Health Organization declared swine flu a pandemic in 2009
It was June 11, 2009, when WHO declared H1N1 swine flu to be a Phase 6 global influenza pandemic, even though it had caused only 144 deaths worldwide
The pandemic declaration put previously arranged “sleeping contracts” into an active state, to the tune of $18 billion directed to the production of H1N1 vaccines, including GSK’s Pandemrix
Pandemrix was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy but GSK didn’t face any repercussions
Prior to the pandemic’s declaration, WHO changed their definition of “pandemic,” removing the previous requirement that it cause “enormous numbers” of deaths
Now, in the midst of another controversial pandemic, we’re facing an eerily similar playbook — with pharmaceutical companies eager to cash in on the first COVID-19 vaccine, begging the question, “Are we are being played — again?”
Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., created “The Jab” video above, which highlights the gold rush that occurred for pharmaceutical companies when the World Health Organization declared swine flu a pandemic in 2009. While Big Pharma got richer, an experimental vaccine was hastily rushed to market, and thousands suffered adverse effects as a result.

Now, in the midst of another controversial pandemic, we’re facing an eerily similar playbook — with pharmaceutical companies eager to cash in on the first COVID-19 vaccine, begging the question, “Are we are being played — again?”1

Pandemic Playbook: First, ‘The Trap’
Pandemics have been coming and going around the globe for centuries, but in recent history they’ve been used as points of manipulation that have profited corporations, particularly pharmaceutical companies. In 2005, you may remember, the bird flu epidemic was predicted to kill from 2 million to 150 million people,2 but turned out to be a whole lot of hot air, and prompted me to write the book “The Great Bird Flu Hoax.”

At the time, Nature Immunology published an editorial stating that the fear of bird flu had prompted government officials to prioritize developing plans to deal with pandemic influenza, and the WHO had named bird flu as the No. 1 health concern.

“This heightened concern exists despite any evidence suggesting sustained human-to-human transmission of the potentially pandemic H5N1 strain of avian influenza virus,” according to the article.3 In the years that followed, WHO executed agreements — so called “sleeping contracts” — with European and African nations in the name of protecting people from a future global pandemic.

The contracts stated that countries would buy vaccines in the event of a pandemic, but this would only be necessary if WHO declared a Phase 6 influenza pandemic.4 Both GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Baxter were named in contracts with the U.K. parliament, for instance, which stated the pharmaceutical companies would supply a pandemic influenza vaccine to the U.K. and were valued at £155.4 million (more than $206 million) over four years.5

“Unfortunately,” CHD noted, “the government officials who signed the contracts never suspected that GSK makes multimillion-dollar donations to the WHO in return for control over decisions that result in GSK windfalls.”6

WHO Changes Definition of Pandemic
It was June 11, 2009, when WHO declared H1N1 swine flu to be a Phase 6 global influenza pandemic, even though it had only caused 144 deaths worldwide. That declaration put the sleeping contracts into an active state, to the tune of $18 billion directed to the production of H1N1 vaccines, including GSK’s Pandemrix.

Prior to the pandemic’s declaration, WHO had defined a pandemic at the top of their Pandemic Preparedness website as follows:7

“An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”

The 144-person death toll certainly didn’t seem to fit the description of an “enormous” number of deaths, but, conveniently, it didn’t matter because WHO changed their definition of a pandemic. According to CHD in “The Jab”:8

“Suspiciously, just 39 days before declaring the pandemic, the W.H.O. deleted the pandemic definition from their website. When confronted, they told the media that their definition ‘painted a rather bleak picture and could be very scary.’

In the new definition, the W.H.O. no longer required that anyone die before they declare a pandemic. GSK’s Pandemrix jab was an experimental vaccine that was never tested for safety or efficacy. It was given straight to hundreds of millions of Africans and Europeans. This wasn’t the time for red tape and formalities. By any definition — rather, by the new definition, we were in a global pandemic.”

Pandemic Expert Panel Fraught With Conflicts of Interest
Lest anyone suggest that WHO, which received funding from GSK, wasn’t entirely unbiased in their decision to declare swine flu a pandemic, it should be noted that the opinion of an Emergency Committee from WHO’s International Health Regulations Review Committee was sought.

The guidance of many of these leading experts benefited the pharmaceutical industry, but their identities were kept secret in order to “protect them from outside influences.”9 In 2010, however, a joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed troubling conflicts of interest between key panel members and the pharmaceutical industry. According to the BMJ:10

“The investigation by the BMJ/The Bureau reveals a system struggling to manage the inherent conflict between the pharmaceutical industry, WHO, and the global public health system, which all draw on the same pool of scientific experts.

Our investigation has identified key scientists involved in WHO pandemic planning who had declarable interests, some of whom are or have been funded by pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were drafting.

Yet these interests have never been publicly disclosed by WHO and, despite repeated requests from the BMJ/The Bureau, WHO has failed to provide any details about whether such conflicts were declared by the relevant experts and what, if anything, was done about them.”

H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Caused Narcolepsy
As is the case with all vaccines, unexpected injuries can occur, but in the case of the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix, GSK continued to promote the vaccine even as cases of adverse events rose. Pandemrix was released in Europe during the swine flu pandemic of 2009 to 2010. Its approval process was accelerated, with most safety and efficacy tests bypassed.

At the time, the WHO tried to assure the public that this was safe, but at the same time they admitted, “Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.”11

Years later, Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy,12 a chronic neurologic condition in which your brain loses its ability to regulate sleep-wake cycles normally.

As a result, this causes you to suddenly fall into a deep sleep at any point during the day, which is debilitating and seriously affects quality of life. Many cases of narcolepsy also involve cataplexy, which is the sudden loss of voluntary muscle control triggered by strong emotions or laughter. According to “The Jab”:13

“GSK’s adjuvanted Pandemrix vaccine caused both [narcolepsy and cataplexy], devastating at least 1,300 children across Europe — for life. In the media, GSK’s AS03 adjuvant, added to stimulate a powerful immune response, shouldered the blame for amplifying these heinous reactions.

Documents obtained by plaintiffs in a series of European lawsuits revealed that GSK knew about the mounting adverse events associated with Pandemrix in the winter of 2009 — including a 5.4-fold increase in death. By December 2009, an injured person filed a report with GSK for every 12,500 doses of Pandemrix administered. Yet, they continued promoting their vaccine in order to move inventory.”

Later, in 2019, researchers described a “novel association between Pandemrix-associated narcolepsy and the non-coding RNA gene GDNF-AS1”14 — a gene thought to regulate the production of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor or GDNF, a protein that plays an important role in neuronal survival.

According to the researchers, “Changes in regulation of GDNF have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases. This finding may increase the understanding of disease mechanisms underlying narcolepsy.”15

Antiviral Drugs Also Fraudulently Stockpiled for Pandemics
Pandemrix is only one example of a pandemic medication gone wrong. Antiviral drugs like Tamiflu are another, yet are still recommended by government agencies like the U.S. CDC,16 despite long-standing studies questioning their effectiveness and safety.

At one point, WHO even classified Tamiflu as an "essential" medicine and recommended that it be used “as soon as possible” after a flu diagnosis.17 WHO’s definition of “essential” is reserved for drugs "selected with due regard to public health relevance, evidence on efficacy and safety, and comparative cost-effectiveness."18

That status was downgraded in 2017, when the WHO moved Tamiflu from a “core” essential medicine to a “complementary” drug, which is used for those that are less cost effective.19

In a BMJ editorial, Mark Ebell, professor of epidemiology at the University of Georgia, called the move “far too late” and described a multisystem failure that allowed Tamiflu to become a blockbuster medication,20 once again in the name of potential pandemics:21

“Concerned about a possible outbreak of avian influenza, as well as the H1N1 pandemic in 2009, the UK government stockpiled oseltamivir at a cost of over £600m (€680m; $770m) from 2006 to 2014. Similarly, the US government has spent over $1.5bn stockpiling the drug, based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”

In 2019, a whistleblower lawsuit was filed against Tamiflu’s maker, Roche, alleging Roche duped the U.S. government into stockpiling Tamiflu while mispresenting its effectiveness. According to the suit, Roche knew Tamiflu was ineffective at fighting influenza pandemics but went ahead and “masterfully marketed this drug to fill Roche’s coffers at taxpayer expense.”22

COVID-19 Deja-Vu
The unsettling question now, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, is whether another experimental vaccine will make it to market, padding the drug companies’ pockets further while putting lives at risk. Asking, “Will they get away with it this time?” “The Jab” notes:23

“Relying on the same attenuated definition of ‘pandemic,’ on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic when its partner, the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator, received 125 million-dollar commitments from the Gates Foundation and Mastercard just one day prior.

On July 31, 2020, GSK and Sanofi scored 2.1 billion US taxpayer dollars to partner on an experimental Covid-19 vaccine. Sanofi will provide the vaccine and GSK will provide — you guessed it — hundreds of millions of doses of their AS03 adjuvant from the 2009 narcolepsy epidemic.”

The earliest results from COVID-19 vaccine studies are starting to roll in, and they’re far from reassuring. Initially, public health officials had stated that a vaccine could be ready in an unprecedented 12 to 18 months. Now, there’s talk of accelerating vaccine delivery even further, with a target date of fall 2020.24

However, as noted by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), based on the historical failures of past coronavirus vaccines, a fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine could become one of the biggest public health disasters in history.

And, no one involved is accountable or will face any repercussions, just as GSK was not held accountable for the narcolepsy cases caused by Pandemrix. Instead, they will all continue to profit."

- Sources and References
1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 23 Children’s Health Defense August 27, 2020
2 ABC News September 30, 2005
3 Nature Immunology volume 7, page115(2006)
5 UK Parliament October 9, 2007
10 BMJ June 12, 2010
11 WHO August 6, 2009
12 Eurosurveillance June 30, 2011; 16(26)
14, 15 EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb; 40: 595–604
16 U.S. CDC, Flu, Treatment: What You Need to Know
17 WHO Guidelines February 2010. Page 10
18 WHO Essential Medicines
19 BMJ 2017;357:j2841
20 BMJ, Who decision to downgrade Tamiflu “comes far too late” argues expert
21 BMJ 2017;358:j3266
22 Halunen Law January 13, 2020
24 The Vaccine Reaction May 3, 2020

[Gwin Ru]

[Exclusive] Final Evidence Covid-19 Is A ‘SimEx’ – Planned Simulation Exercise by WHO and World Bank (https://silview.media/2020/09/09/exclusive-final-evidence-covid-19-is-a-a-simex-planned-simulation-exercise-by-who-and-world-bank/)

by Silviu "Silview" Costinescu (https://silview.media/author/onemanmall/)
Sep 09 2020 (https://silview.media/2020/09/09/exclusive-final-evidence-covid-19-is-a-a-simex-planned-simulation-exercise-by-who-and-world-bank/)


https://silviewhome.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/20dc-virus-warnings-jp3-superjumbo-v2.jpg?w=1120&h=630&crop=1


It all comes round now…

World leaders dealt above our heads, played their games and kept the plebs in the dark using smoke-screens of technocratic lingo. The elites are resetting our lives. All about The Great Reset.

TIMELINE


2005 WHO member countries sign the new International Health Regulations (IHR) which is basically the implementation of the Health Management chapter in The Great Reset, the tactical manual for the New World Order aka New Normal. The document envisions using drills to perfect the new system.
Download IHR in PDF (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43883/9789241580410_eng.pdf)



2014 – The creation of The Global Health Security Agenda (https://ghsagenda.org/) (GHSA), “a group of 69 countries, international organizations and non-government organizations, and private sector companies that have come together to achieve the vision of a world safe and secure from global health threats posed by infectious diseases”.
It was launched by a group of 44 countries and organizations including WHO, as a five-year multilateral effort with the purpose to accelerate the implementation of IHR, particularly in developing countries. In 2017, GHSA was expanded to include non-state actors. It was also extended through 2024 with the release of the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) 2024 Framework (called “GHSA 2024”). The latter has the purpose to reach a standardized level of capacity to combat infectious diseases.
All financed through the World Bank, of course. Which is controlled by the Rothschild cartel.



Rothschilds patent the first Covid-19 test (https://nl.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=nl_NL&FT=D&date=20200903&CC=US&NR=2020279585A1&KC=A1#)k (https://silview.media/2020/10/04/atomic-bombshell-rothschilds-patented-covid-19-biometric-tests-in-2015-and-2017/)it (https://nl.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=nl_NL&FT=D&date=20200903&CC=US&NR=2020279585A1&KC=A1#) in the Netherlands.
According to Dutch Government’s website for patent registrations: “A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.”


https://silviewhome.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/roth-covid.jpg?w=1024


2017-2018 – World Bank’s website reports massive shipments of COVID-19 medical devices (tests, mainly). See our previous reports (https://silview.media/2020/09/07/world-bank-says-covid-19-test-kits-are-being-sold-since-2017/).



2019 In its first annual report (https://apps.who.int/gpmb/), WHO and WB’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (https://apps.who.int/gpmb/) identifies the most urgent actions required to accelerate preparedness for health emergencies. This first report focuses on epidemics and pandemics.
The document is “co-convened by the World Health Organization and the World Bank Group”.
Under “Progress indicator(s) by September 2020“, the report states:


The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).

Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_Annual_Report_Exec_Summary_Foreword_and_About_English.pdf)
https://silviewhome.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/wb-covid-4.png?w=1024


Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst.

[...]

Full (long) article: https://silview.media/2020/09/09/exclusive-final-evidence-covid-19-is-a-a-simex-planned-simulation-exercise-by-who-and-world-bank/


Related:


Remember that Pompeo said the COVID-19 Pandemic was a “Live Exercise” (Video) (https://stateofthenation.co/?p=30542)

[T Smith]

I'm not sure if this video has been posted elsewhere; this thread may be the best place. The video below contains highly recommended material regarding the who/what/ and why behind the COVID-19 crimes against humanity conspiracy, as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.

The video is likely at risk of being taken down and lays out the facts of the conspiracy by an intentional group of lawyers who have waged a class-action civil suit against specific conspirators.

kr04gHbP5MQ

[onawah]

Operation Coronavirus is Working Hand-in-Hand with the Nanotech Agenda
Published 2 days ago on October 7, 2020
By Makia Freeman
https://thefreedomarticles.com/operation-coronavirus-hand-in-hand-with-nanotech-agenda/

AT A GLANCE...
"THE STORY:It's an openly admitted fact the current COVID vaccines in development will be nanotech vaccines, using a variety of nanotech platforms and delivery systems.
THE IMPLICATIONS:COVID is a pretext to push forward the sinister nanotech agenda – the infiltration of the human body with nanosensors capable of transmitting and receiving data.
nanotech agenda
The nanotech agenda (human microchipping) is being forwarded by Operation Coronavirus, especially with the coming COVID vaccine.

https://397145-1250082-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/nanotech-agenda.jpg
The nanotech agenda –
involving the placement of tiny sensors, devices and machines measured in nanometers inside the human body – is receiving a boost from the current fake pandemic which I have labeled Operation Coronavirus. My earlier article Hydrogel Biosensor: Implantable Nanotech to be Used in COVID Vaccines? discussed the possibility that the coming COVID vaccines may incorporate nanotechnology funded by DARPA called hydrogel, a biosensor which would monitor your body as well as send and receive information to the 5G Smart Grid. However there is much, much more to the story. The NWO conspirators have not only been planning this scamdemic for decades, but also have been planning the nanotech agenda for a long time too; now, with the advent of COVID, the two agendas are merging, with sinister implications for humanity. This article will take a closer look at the nanotech agenda and the current state of nanotechnology inside existing products such as vaccines. The agenda is already far more advanced than many people realize.

2008 Paper Outlines Plan to Construct a Nanorobot Hardware Architecture
A 2008 research paper entitled Nanorobot Hardware Architecture for Medical Defense analyzes in fine detail how nanotech devices such as nanorobots could be used to for various purposes such as “medical defense” and “epidemic control.” It states that it provides details on an “integrated platform and hardware architecture for nanorobots application in epidemic control, which should enable real time in vivo prognosis of biohazard infection.” The idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies which communicates in real time with the Smart Grid (powered by 5G) to provide intimate information to the authorities about us. Wayne from Alchemical Tech Revolution does a great commentary here. Following are some quotes from the paper:

“Normally, for areas in public calamity or conflict zones, the absence of drinking water, any sort of fuel, electricity, and the lack of towers for network communication, including cable and wireless telephony, is a constant. In such a situation, the available infrastructure is far from ideal to enable a large scale medical laboratory with precise and fast analysis. For such aspect, nanorobots integrated with nanobiosensors can help to transmit real time information, using international mobile phones for wireless data transmission through satellite communication. In fact, nanorobots should mean an efficient and powerful clinical device to provide precious biomedical monitoring, both for soldiers as for civilian population.”

Notice how they admit that there is dual use (for military and civilians) which usually connotes a weapons system with another use. In this case, they are disguising the deeper purpose (embedded surveillance) with the superficial purpose (a medical application):

“Taking from the moment of infection, some contagious diseases may show the first symptoms after hours, a week, or longer time, like years or even decades. It means, for example, that when the public authorities noticed the infection from a contaminated person, showing external symptoms, a virus had enough time to spread itself through a circle of friends and workmates of the infected victim. Meantime, those mates were adversely driving the virus forward, and had started a catastrophic chain circle. The use of nanorobots with embedded nanodevices for real time epidemic control, as lab on a chip, can be useful to avoid serious contamination with large proportions.”

The above quote hypes the danger of contagion, and specifically a virus, as a reason for you to willingly submit to the nanotech agenda and get embedded with nanotechnology. It appeals to the concepts of contagion and germ theory, however especially since the COVID scamdemic began, a number of brave independent researchers and doctors are questioning these ideas, which reinforce the current Medical Industry’s business model of petrochemical pills and vaccines.
..
“We implemented a system simulation and architecture of nanorobots for sensing the bloodstream, targeting biochemical changes against pathological signals. Actual advances in wireless technologies, nanoelectronics devices, and their use in the implementation of nanorobots applied to epidemic control, illustrate what upcoming technologies can enable in terms of real time health monitoring. The approach for in vivo monitoring chemical concentrations should also apply to other.”

As Wayne says, this stuff is next level contact tracing. Forget an app on your phone; the plan is for in vivo (taking place in a living organism) surveillance. There are many significant quotes from the paper, but here is one last one:

“Frequencies ranging from 1 to 20MHz can be successfully used for biomedical applications without any damage.”

Is the implication that there could be damage if frequencies are higher than 20MHz, such as in the 30-100 GHz range of 5G?

2017 Study Shows Nanotech Contaminants Already Widely Present in Vaccines
The nanotech invasion is already here. It’s not a question of “will they place nanotech in vaccines” since they already have. This 2017 Italian study entitled New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination details an astonishing array of nanocontaminants in vaccines, including particles made of lead, cadmium, cerium, iron, titanium, nickel, zirconium, hafnium, strontium, tungsten, gold, silver, platinum, antimony, bismuth and aluminum. The study (which analyzes 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines) states that these contaminants are “non biodegradable and non biocompatible”, that their inclusion is “not declared” and that their presence is “inexplicable.” It gives the benefit of the doubt to Big Pharma and its controllers when it concludes that “our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.” Knowing the background of the human microchipping and nanotech agenda, I would suggest there is another way to see things.

The study reveals how these nanoparticles can interact with the body in negative ways and cause harmful effects:

“… investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction occurs and a “protein corona” is formed. The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body. Figure 5a-5f show examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec, of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix.”

“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas … But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination … As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect … due to a nano-bio-interaction … can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way … It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA … “

“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues … “

So here is the question to ponder: are these so-called accidental and dangerous nanocontaminants just particles that deleteriously affect human health in numerous ways, or are they also nanosensors that can receive and transmit data to the Smart Grid?

Nanotechnology is at the Forefront of Cutting-Edge Vaccine Research
The nanotech agenda is closely connected to vaccines. For example, this 2019 study Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses touts the advantages of nanotech vaccines:

“Conventional vaccines based on live-attenuated pathogens present a risk of reversion to pathogenic virulence while inactivated pathogen vaccines often lead to a weak immune response. Subunit vaccines were developed to overcome these issues. However, these vaccines may suffer from a limited immunogenicity and, in most cases, the protection induced is only partial. A new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit vaccines. This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise control over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties, leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity.”

This July 2020 study COVID-19 vaccine development and a potential nanomaterial path forward explains how there are many nanotech platforms that will be included in future vaccines:

“Nanotechnology-based approaches offer enabling solutions to the delivery challenge by trafficking the vaccine to appropriate cellular populations and subcellular locations … Moderna’s mRNA vaccine is based on a lipid nanoparticle platform, but there are many other emerging nanotechnologies for delivery of nucleic acid vaccines … Nanotechnology platforms including cationic nanoemulsions, liposomes, dendrimers or polysaccharide particles have been employed for improving the stability and delivery of mRNA based vaccines.”

The coming Moderna COVID vaccine funded by NWO frontman and eugenicist Bill Gates is a new type of technology: an mRNA vaccine that uses nanotechnology. This goes for other COVID vaccines that are being developed. The COVID plandemic is being used as a pretext to rush forward even faster with nanotech vaccines, which ultimately accelerates the central NWO (New World Order) scheme: the human microchipping agenda. The nanotech agenda via COVID is on full display:

“Nanomaterials play an important role in all aspects of vaccine design, delivery and administration. Nanoparticles enable multivalent antigen presentation and stabilization of antigens upon administration, they can serve as adjuvants to boost the immune response, and they can act as carriers for the targeted delivery of antigens. Indeed, an mRNA vaccine delivered by a liposomal nanoparticle is amongst the candidates currently in clinical trials against SARS-CoV-2. While it remains a fact that no mRNA or DNA vaccine is currently approved for any disease, the delivery of nucleic acids requires some form of modification or a nanodevice to prevent degradation in the body, and liposomal devices have indeed already been approved for RNA delivery, albeit not yet for vaccines.”

Final Thoughts on the Accelerating Nanotech Agenda
This is it! It’s game on! All the things that many alternative researchers have been writing, talking and warning about for years are arriving. Operation Coronavirus is the gateway to bring in the New World Order. COVID has been the excuse offered by tyrants for just about every draconian restriction under the sun. Now, with the coming COVID vaccine, we know it will include some kind of nanotechnology, since as I have outlined above, there are a plethora of nanotechnology platforms being developed in addition to things like hydrogel. Various studies and the pharmaceutical companies themselves are openly stating that there will be nanotech COVID vaccines. With plans to make this vaccine widepsread, administed by the military (as admitted in both the US and the UK) and “as mandatory as possible” (according to Aussie PM Scott Morrison), time is running out for people to wake up to the nanotech agenda – before it’s too late."

*****

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.

Sources:

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/hydrogel-biosensor-darpa-gates-implantable-nanotech-covid-vaccine/

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/9-simulations-drills-laws-prepared-for-the-coronavirus/

*https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/8/5/2932/htm

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvzUtK3di0c

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/western-medicine-rockefeller-medicine/

*https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro–and-nanocontamination.html

*https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00022/full

*https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-0737-y

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/bill-gates-vaccines-reduce-population-growth/

*https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-0757-7

*https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/19/vaccine-should-be-as-mandatory-as-possible-australian-pm-says.html

*https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/07/what-could-they-put-in-the-covid-vaccine/

[Delight]

Humaphobia... fear of other human beings

2gkUJk4dvaM

[Gwin Ru]

Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74)

Lockdowns have been used to control the coronavirus around the world, plunging millions of lives into chaos. Now the WHO has changed its mind.
https://www.news.com.au/wp-content/themes/vip/newscorpau-nca/assets/dist/img/common/headshots/alex-turner-cohen.png?v=4 (https://www.news.com.au/the-team/alex-turner-cohen) Alex Turner-Cohen (https://www.news.com.au/the-team/alex-turner-cohen)

October 11, 20204:19pm


Video (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74#)

The World Health Organisation has controversially claimed that the world is misusing lockdowns as a way to control the virus.

The World Health Organisation has backflipped on its original COVID-19 stance after calling for world leaders to stop locking down their countries and economies.

Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus).

He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.

“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.


https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/cb45631d7d1195e753b8db14d1271182?width=650
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.Source:Twitter

“We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr Nabarro told (https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434) The Spectator (https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434).

“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Dr Nabarro’s main criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected.
“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said.

“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
Melbourne’s lockdown has been hailed as one of the strictest and longest in the world. In Spain’s lockdown in March, people weren’t allowed to leave the house unless it was to walk their pet (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-spanish-police-have-fined-people-for-walking-bizarre-pets-including-hens-fish-and-toy-dogs/news-story/48818577043b9b3e4957e1663b6c11e6). In China, authorities welded doors shut to stop people from leaving their homes (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10925668/coronavirus-patients-welded-homes-china/). The WHO thinks these steps were largely unnecessary.

Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/271f07eccc53820d61d52f429f226986?width=650
The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFPSource:AFP


His message is timely. In a world first, a number of health experts from all over the world came together calling for an end to coronavirus lockdowns earlier this week.
They created a petition, called the Great Barrington Declaration, which said that lockdowns were doing “irreparable damage.”
“As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” read the petition.

“Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”
The petition has had 12,000 signatures so far.

It was authored by Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University.

When asked about the petition, Dr Nabarro had only good things to say. “Really important point by Professor Gupta,” he said.

[onawah]

Interesting!! :bump: The question now is when will they advise AGAINST masking and admit how much damage that has been causing.
So many people still think "better safe than sorry" but the mounting evidence shows it's NOT safe!


Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74)

[norman]

Interesting!! :bump: The question now is when will they advise AGAINST masking and admit how much damage that has been causing.
So many people still think "better safe than sorry" but the mounting evidence shows it's NOT safe!


Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns (https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74)



I guess they've been crunching the numbers.

The hot (lockdown) zones in the UK (for example) map out to look remarkably like the BREXIT support hot zones. If any one country tips over the edge into full revolt, the WHO won't be able to stop the dominos falling.

[greybeard]

They are back peddling on lockdown because of the weight of professional opinion and millions coming out to demonstrate.
They are trying to mitigate the consequences, to them, of their actions.
Our advice was misunderstood etc.
Chris

[Tintin]

"All of these numbers fit with what I see in my clinical practice. I have personally admitted dozens of elderly people to hospital with illness resulting from social isolation and neglect. Some were literally starving to death. One patient, in her eighties, lived in a retirement community but relied on family members to feed her meals. When they were socially distanced (banned) from the premises, she couldn’t feed herself and her health quickly deteriorated. Another patient, a 92-year-old woman, simply gave up on life and started refusing her meals once her family stopped coming to visit. Both these scenes were catastrophically inhumane and will stick with me for a long time. Neither is captured in the government’s Covid-19 statistics." - Dr Matt Strauss

______________________________

Where better than to hear from a doctor's perspective hands-on what they have experienced to date, over the course of the last seven or so months. Dr Matt Strauss writing in The Spectator makes a compelling case against the use, or continued use, of 'lockdown' (prison industrial complex terminology of course) as a mitigation citing personal experience of the negative health outcomes from pursuing such a reckless and unnecessary policy.

______________________________

A medic’s case against another lockdown
14 October 2020, 7:00am

Source: The Spectator (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/a-medic-s-case-against-another-lockdown)

'Do no harm' are three words all doctors must follow in the course of their work. These words make me convinced that Covid-19 lockdowns are the wrong approach, and a growing number of doctors are on my side.

Medical students throughout the West are taught the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence as pillars of medical ethics. In simple terms, they dictate that the likely benefits of our treatments ought to substantially outweigh their potential risks.

In my practice, I prescribe medications like atorvastatin to lower cholesterol, or warfarin to thin the blood, because international, randomised, double-blind control trials have proven that their benefits far outweigh their risks.

If I were to prescribe thalidomide (which causes birth defects) for morning sickness, or phen-phen (which causes heart problems) for weight loss, that would be unethical malpractice; their risks outweigh their benefits. Generally, prescriptions for such medications are not allowed because regulatory bodies like the Food and Drug Administration in the US or the MHRA in the UK take them off the market once their disproportionate risks become clear.

If lockdowns were a prescription drug for Covid-19 treatment, the FDA would never have approved it. The seminal Imperial College London paper and other mathematical models like it were used to justify their use, but clinicians would never prescribe a drug or propose a surgery based on such modelling. The now well-publicised (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/can-we-trust-covid-modelling-more-evidence-from-sweden) failure (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/) of these models to accurately predict Covid-19 outcomes proves the rule.

Luckily, we no longer have to talk about mathematical models. We now have seven months of real-world data to look at. Some pundits compare Sweden to Norway to argue for lockdown. Others compare Sweden to the UK, or Florida to New York to argue against. Either sort is vulnerable to accusations of cherry-picking the data. In medical science, we rely on epidemiologists to take all the available data from all the countries and perform statistical analyses to correct for as many different variables as possible.

This has now been done for lockdowns. In August, the Lancet (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext) published an analysis of data from 50 countries. The researchers found that full lockdowns were 'not associated' with decreased mortality from Covid-19. These are hard outcome data; reality cannot be waved away with theories or projections.

So much for the purported benefits. What about the risks? We cannot answer this question fully because a worldwide lockdown experiment has never been run before. However, evidence for the harms of lockdown is now piling up. In the US, homicides are up 50 per cent (https://ca.news.yahoo.com/a-worrisome-trend-rising-murder-rate-is-a-national-problem-data-shows-163859069.html) compared to last summer. In France, domestic violence calls are up 30 per cent (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/world/coronavirus-domestic-violence.html). In Canada, almost three times more people are contemplating suicide (https://cmha.ca/news/warning-signs-more-canadians-thinking-about-suicide-during-pandemic) compared to last year; and in British Columbia, overdose deaths have tripled (http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Statistics%20and%20Research/Statistics%20and%20Reports/Overdose/Overdose%20Response%20Indicator%20Report.pdf) from pre-pandemic levels. When you deprive children of their education, adults of their livelihood, and elderly people of their social connections, desperation and despair quickly set in. While a thoughtful person might have predicted this, the mathematical models did not.

All of these numbers fit with what I see in my clinical practice. I have personally admitted dozens of elderly people to hospital with illness resulting from social isolation and neglect. Some were literally starving to death. One patient, in her eighties, lived in a retirement community but relied on family members to feed her meals. When they were socially distanced (banned) from the premises, she couldn’t feed herself and her health quickly deteriorated. Another patient, a 92-year-old woman, simply gave up on life and started refusing her meals once her family stopped coming to visit. Both these scenes were catastrophically inhumane and will stick with me for a long time. Neither is captured in the government’s Covid-19 statistics.

So if a physician were to prescribe a lockdown to a savvy patient who asked about the risks, the physician would have to disclose that depression, suicide, homicide, overdose, wife-beating, and starvation are potential side effects. Rare is the patient who would agree to take such a pill, which brings me to the other pillar of medical ethics: autonomy. Physicians do not force treatment on competent, non-consenting patients. When we discuss treatments with patients, we strive to ground those discussions in the patient’s values and not our own.

I am a life-support specialist. At this point in my career, hundreds of elderly patients have instructed me not to put them on life support. Many have told me they are comfortable with their mortality and that if not much time is left to them, they would rather spend it eating ice cream or listening to music with their family, not hooked up to my machines. It is not for me or the SAGE group to tell such a person what they ought to decide. These are questions of values, not medical science, and values are personal.

It would be deeply unethical for me to put such a patient on a ventilator against their wishes. It would likewise be deeply unethical for the SAGE group to commit such a person to social isolation. I know that reasonable, educated people can decline to consent to further lockdowns because I, for myself, do not consent to further lockdowns.

As a medic, my verdict is clear: mandatory government lockdowns amount to a medical recommendation of no proven benefit, of extraordinary potential harm, that do not take personal values and individual consent into account. Physicians who call for their use should hearken back to these core planks of their ethical training.

_____________________________

Cited article resources:

Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/pdf/main.pdf

Lancet study on Covid-19 adoptive measures: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2589-5370%2820%2930208-X

British Columbia report on overdose rates: http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Statistics%20and%20Research/Statistics%20and%20Reports/Overdose/Overdose%20Response%20Indicator%20Report.pdf

[greybeard]

MY PLANS TO BECOME YOUR NEXT MAYOR OF LONDON - Learn More at BrianForMayor.London

" Well you never know --Brian is getting quite a following.
I dont know if he is eligible being American, I think?
Anyway it would be a refreshing change if it happens
Chris"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfhcSiUT4MA

[T Smith]

They are back peddling on lockdown because of the weight of professional opinion and millions coming out to demonstrate.
They are trying to mitigate the consequences, to them, of their actions.
Our advice was misunderstood etc.
Chris

After about a month of data (honest data, not NWO-weaponized data)--and after it was abundantly clear COVID-19 was in league with a nasty seasonal flu, anyone with slightly more than a few neurons firing knew the lockdown was agenda-ridden and would be a global disaster. It's just common sense. The cure cannot be worse than the disease, unless that is the intended outcome.

So why the flip now? It could be because of the weight of professional opinion, but that was also prevelant months ago, mostly contained and in blackout, so why now?

My guess is the WHO is strategically setting the stage for a global economic recovery/reset in advance of an imminent Biden/Harris victory (https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-has-91-percent-chance-winning-electoral-college-latest-economist-forecast-predicts-1538496), so by the time the new administration is sworn in we will already be well into the beginning stages of dismantling the American Republic (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111213-The-planned-takedown-of-America-now--June-2020--in-full-swing.) and the old Bretton Woods system and installing the NWO.

Of course they could wait until after Biden is elected to announce this flip, but my guess is that would be far too obvious in regard to the agenda afoot and might risk some form of strong resistance/resurgence.

My take is the NWO, via the WHO, has strategically announced the timing of otherwise obvious information and is rolling full steam ahead with the plan for mass vaccination and global reset.

[Gwin Ru]

...

From Jim Stone:


http://www.jimstone.is/pages/littletoxic.jpg

[Gwin Ru]

...
Conversation

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1790281240/henry-makow_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow) Henry Makow (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow) @HenryMakow (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow)

Correction - Michael O'Bernicia sues UK Parliament. Mark Devlin interviews him.


1317486006967336963

[onawah]

Oneness Versus the 1%
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 18, 2020

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/18/vandana-shiva-oneness-versus-the-1.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20201018Z1&mid=DM686125&rid=990393068

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In “Oneness Vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom,” Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., argues that the ultra-wealthy elite are responsible for a majority of the environmental, financial and health crises currently facing us
Bill Gates’ wealth and “philanthropic” efforts, for example, have allowed him to gain unprecedented influence over agriculture and global health policies that threaten food security and human health
The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed a massive transfer of wealth to the rich
While global lockdowns have decimated small businesses and left many to struggle financially, wealthy globalists have amassed immense profits, and lockdowns have prevented public mobilization against tech and retail giants
To facilitate the transfer of wealth, the elite lobby for the elimination of labor and environmental laws, as well as human and farmer’s rights

bkEusvHUOzw

"In this interview, social justice and anti-GMO advocate Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., discusses her book, "Oneness Vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom," which she co-wrote with her son, in which she argues that the ultra-wealthy elite are responsible for a majority of the environmental, financial and health crises currently facing us.

In reality, it's really about the 0.001% — the small number of billionaires and centibillionaires who have become ultra-rich over the past 30 years or so. Most of them didn't exist before globalization. The 1% is just a useful metaphor for the ruling elite that the publisher thought would be easier to communicate.

One of the key players is, no surprise, Bill Gates, whose wealth and "philanthropic" efforts have garnered him unprecedented influence over agriculture and global health policies that threaten food security and human health.

"I was in Paris for the climate summit, and I've been doing this UN Summit since the Earth summit in '92. I've been doing the Biodiversity Convention, drafting of clauses, including Article 19.1, which basically required biosafety and assessment of GMOs. So, I was very surprised that, for the first time, the billionaires were on the stage with the heads of state," she says.

The Ongoing Transfer of Wealth
One of the "solutions" to climate change offered by this billionaire club was geoengineering, which in reality is no solution at all. As noted by Shiva, if the climate is already changing for the worse, engineering temperatures, deflecting sunlight, dumping iron fillings on the ocean and chemicals in the sky, and creating artificial volcanoes, you're simply creating additional problems without solving the original one.

At the end of the August 2020 update of the book, she also discusses COVID-19, and how this engineered pandemic has catalyzed the transfer of wealth to the rich. While global lockdowns have decimated small businesses and left many to struggle financially, the rich have amassed fantastic profits.

"The 2008 crisis was very clearly about deregulation of the financial economy," she says. "It was about collateral, it was about taking securities, bundling up risk, and then the system totally collapsed because it was really trading in fictions. But I've been working on the economy, because I started to work on the seed in 1987.

Companies wanted to own and patent life. That's how my journey on GMO started. But they also wanted to change the trade laws. They wanted to own seed as their creation. They wanted an intellectual property treaty in the GATT. I first heard this in a 1987 [United Nations] meeting.

That's when I decided: a) I would save seeds, b) I would keep track of the GATT and the World Trade Organization (WTO). The antiglobalization movement grew out of that, and the International Forum on Globalization. We shut down WTO in Seattle, which shows the power of the people. We will not allow this lie of seed being Monsanto's invention.

I worked with our [Indian] parliament, I worked with our government to write laws. Article 3G [says] seeds are not inventions. This is what has prevented Monsanto from ripping off Indian farmers even more than they did. They've been taken to court now for the illegal collection of technology fees …

Basically, what we have today is this transfer of wealth. Monsanto's behavior is also the big tech's behavior. Do they produce anything? No. They only collect rents on digital platforms. They're rent collectors …

I saw the seed issue with Monsanto. I said, 'Here they are collecting rents from seed, which they didn't make. Then we won't let them own it.' In effect, whether it's Amazon or Gates, they're basically rent collectors. What they've done with this pandemic is literally create a closed economy, which depends on them and their rent collection."

The eight-minute video below provides a sobering summary of the massive wealth transfer that has occurred in 2020 thanks to pandemic lockdowns, during which small businesses were forced to close while giant multinational companies were allowed to stay open and thereby monopolize the market. The end result is the largest transfer of wealth in modern history.

G_SQ72u60c8

The End of Democracy
Shiva goes on to review how India mobilized against Walmart's encroachment, which threatened to destroy local businesses. The COVID-19 lockdowns, however, have prevented the same kind of mobilization against the tech and retail giants.

As local businesses around the world have had to close their doors for months on end, Amazon.com's power has exploded. Amazon is even encroaching on grocery suppliers.

"I was just reading a paper, that the super wealthy in the U.S. have transferred $50 trillion to themselves [over the past 30 years; the globalization period] … While they rob you of your job, they're still extracting [money from] you for that forced software program on digital payments, for software programs on … digital education.

Poor Indian children, who could afford a universal education, now cannot afford education because their parents have no smartphones. So, we are seeing an engineered imposition of an economy. A healthy economy grows as an evolution with choices, with justice, with equity …

True economies would say, 'Here is what I bring. If my digital [currency is] better than your cash, choose it. Is my forced vaccination better than your immunity? Make your choice.' The minute choice is removed from people's life, democracies stop. When the choice is removed from our conditions of being, our conditions of living, then life is threatened …

What is globalization but deregulation of commerce? It is knocking down every law that was put in place by democratic societies for the protection of the environment, the protection of health, the right to education, the rights of workers. Now that's what's being targeted."

In India, they recently eliminated all labor laws, and they're trying to remove the Farmers' Rights Act, as well as environmental laws. This is what allows for the transfer of wealth to happen, Shiva says.

The End Game
As explained by Shiva, all of these companies are essentially rent collectors. Facebook turns our minds into a raw material that is then capitalized upon. "Gates is particularly vicious because through the Gates Foundation, he pretends to be doing philanthropy," she says.

But with every philanthropic endeavor, he carves out new colonies from which he can collect new rents and make new investments. "That's why no matter how much he gives, he gets richer and richer," Shiva says. "A genuine giver would get poorer."

In her book, she explains how, without Gates, there would be no commercial gene editing, for example, which is the new GMO. He created a company called Editas Medicine Inc. to facilitate the patenting of these new climate-resilient plants, with which they aim to create new medicines. "He will do biofortification to solve the nutrition problem. He is particularly vicious," she says. As for what the ultimate goal might be, Shiva says:

"The first thing is, of course, they want to use their money-making tools to make more money. So, it is a dictatorship of the technology balance. That's why people should be paying a lot more attention to the violent imposition of digitalization.

A lot of my friends, who never studied the roots of these violence systems, who never understood that agrichemicals came from Hitler's concentration camps and that the agrichemical industry is the poison cartel responsible for the genocide, they're continuing that genocide.

Technologies as tools of domination and exploitation are not neutral. A lot of progressive think, 'More digitalization, more democracy.' How can a surveillance economy be an enlargement of your freedom? You have to have the systems in place, the regulations in place, the choices in place to be able to make these technologies a servant and not your master."

The Global Merger
They also want to merge all of these various industries together — agriculture, technology and finance. Shiva recounts how, in 2016, India banned all cash and made digital transactions compulsory. In short order, "90% of poor people lost their savings, their incomes," she says, as small, local economies evaporated. Meanwhile, the wealthy elites also control the world's economy via their asset funds.

"Corporations don't own themselves anymore. Even the corporations are owned by the billionaires, the same BlackRocks, the same Vanguards control every big company, Coca-Cola to McDonald's to Boeing. Look at anything in the world, it's the billionaire money and their asset management funds.

Last year, BlackRock increased its wealth from $1 trillion to $7 trillion, which means the billionaires increased their wealth. During the lockdown, they invaded even more deeply into the Amazon and became richer.

So, these investment asset management funds are the billionaires' wealth, and it is increasing. That is merging with IT and information technology and the tech barons, and it's merging with biotechnology and the chemical industry.

That's why they're talking about digitalization of agriculture — farming without farmers and, worse, food without food. One of the big pushes of Gates and Silicon Valley is into fake food."

As noted by Shiva, while Big Biotech claims GMOs will save your health and protect the planet, these pesticide-laden plants are in fact doing the complete opposite.

We Are the Throwaways
There's also the issue of social justice. She cites Gandhi, who said that if you're in doubt about what the right thing to do is, "bring the face of the most vulnerable person to your mind's eye and do what is good for them." If you think it will harm them more, don't do it.

"They deliberately want to get rid of large parts of humanity," Shiva says. "First through hunger, then through sickness. They want a digital economy, they want a sick economy. Otherwise, you wouldn't be spending all your time on Big Pharma; you'd spend your time making sure that the smaller farmer doesn't get destroyed …

On a planetary scale, we are seeing these irresponsible, greedy, indifferent, callous men bring the world, and humanity, to a brink. That's why we have to act and find creative ways …

All of these tech barons who have taken over the economy, hiding behind the virus, are all jumping into life sciences. Google has a new life sciences division. This will be the final defeat of Mother Nature, At a time [when] the world is waking up to the rules of nature and healthy bodies, healthy ecosystems, an eco-healthy planet, they're still carrying on the Colonial franchise of defeating Mother Nature."

The Great Economic Reset
None of these things is coming out of left field. They've been carefully planned for many decades. We now see clear evidence that a "great economic reset" is in the works, which will transition everything over to digital currencies.

If there's one project we should have, it's strategies to get rid of the robber barons, whatever it takes. ~ Vandana Shiva, Ph.D.
As noted by Shiva, the industrial revolution shifted our mindset to one where we thought of nature as dead. The result was ecological destruction and the fragmentation of society. The coming economic reset is basically part of an effort to further manipulate and shift our mental framework toward something wholly unnatural. Shiva says:

"In India, they attacked and are still attacking organic and created something called the Zero-Budget Natural Farming … What they're basically doing is giving big loans to the state, which then gives fat loans to the farmer. In the meantime, Gates is mining farm data.

He's getting people placed in the homes of farmers to mine data. Then they'll create algorithms to sell that data back. But all of this is now being reduced to carbon in the soil. You'll get zero % for what you grow. You can get no needs of yours met through food and fodder, but we will allow you to trade in the global market on the carbon in your soil, and that's what would keep you alive. This whole financialization of nature is one aspect.

The second aspect in the great reset is to redo the economy to make it look like those who are now disposable throwaway people deserved it. They created the language of competition.

[When I was writing] my epilogue, I had just received Microsoft's patent, [which] basically reduces human beings to users. Our brain activity is tapped into in various ways. Everyone wants to have smart wear these days. I should call it spyware. That data goes through algorithms. Those algorithms will decide what [we are worthy of and] Bitcoins will be allocated to us.

But every child born is born worthy. Every member of society has equal human rights. So, they're undoing everything we've put in place on humanity, on human rights, on democracy. This is where we need to be alert.

I think the whole issue of the pandemic and the lockdown was useful for them for two reasons. One, they could get everyone afraid. Second, they could get everyone distracted while they took over the economy, they took over our minds. They basically transferred all the remaining wealth to themselves."

More Information
To learn more, please listen to the interview in its entirety, and be sure to pick up a copy of "Oneness Vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom." You can also find more details about Shiva's work on Navdanya.org.

"I personally feel that this assault is coming at a time when, in India and the world, there's a new rising of consciousness of the planet and its living systems, of our health and our living systems, and the connection between our health and the health of the planet. At this point … it needs a lot of brutal violence to impose. So, to the extent they can keep the virus as their shield to hide behind, they will."

I agree with Shiva when she says that rather than allowing COVID-19 fear-mongering take over our lives, we need to look at the infrastructures of life, humanity, democracy, economy and taxation, "and start thinking about who's taking them away from us."

"You have to protect that which you treasure," she says. "Freedom and life are what are being taken right now … We have to resist fear and we have to resist hate. We are thinking beings; let us use the minds we've been given and let us rebuild community.

Again, I don't think the 6-foot distancing is by accident. Why do they use the words 'social distancing' rather than 'physical distancing'? Six feet is a physical measure. They … want us to forget that being a human being means being in community. They want us to be users of gadgets.

We must be community. We must remember that we are interrelated to the rest of life on Earth and to society. That's why we have to be talking [about how to] rebuild regenerative economies … I think we lost a lot of time thinking the only issue was energy, how energy is produced. We lost two decades of how food is produced.

I really believe that if people start becoming aware that eating good food is the single most important [strategy for health], and growing food in the right way is the single most important part to regeneration of the planet, this will rebuild community …

I think we need to start doing homework to say, 'Where's the wealth going? How should the tax flow look? How is our money going to make the billionaires richer? How can they keep extracting more money out of us?

How is our public money the new subsidy to create the infrastructure for greed, rather than be the public resources to create the infrastructure of life, of care and of solidarity? … What in our current legal framework can stop this hemorrhaging of public money to move upwards to the billionaires?

These are foundational issues. Who are we as human beings? How will we live in the future? What is the future we will create long after the robber barons are gone, because they were there in the 1930s and we learned how to get rid of them. If there's one project we should have, it's strategies to get rid of the robber barons, whatever it takes …

I don't think we have the luxury to be hopeless. Hope is something you must cultivate on a daily basis. Cultivating hope is cultivating resistance. Cultivating hope is cultivating the strategy." "

[onawah]

Dr. Robert Young in Project Camelot news again

See: https://projectcamelotportal.com/2021/04/30/phd-virologist-proves-covid19-does-not-exist/



California PhD Virologist proves Covid19 does not exist.

https://i2.wp.com/projectcamelotportal.com/wp-content/uploads/COVID19DOESNOTEXISTTITLE.jpg?fit=1933%2C925&ssl=1

Another doctor, Dr. Robert Young and many other doctors and scientists have said Covid19 could never be “isolated” and the CDC has had no proof all along…. But the studies mentioned here should prove it conclusively..the whole thing was a hoax to force people to take vaccines as part of a TRANSHUMANIST AGENDA …as I have said all along.
See the video at:

https://videos.files.wordpress.com/aUCXu7hB/virallabvideocovi-doesntexist_mov_dvd.mp4
https://videos.files.wordpress.com/aUCXu7hB/virallabvideocovi-doesntexist_mov_dvd.mp4

What this scientist has done by doing tests and getting Stanford and Cornell to do the tests as well …is prove the so-called Covid19 was a hoax and that very likely Trump and his AI/Looking Glass, NSA and the generals all knew this FROM THE BEGINNING… No doubt the tests the above scientists and others have done were probably inevitably done at the beginning of the so-called outbreak and found the same thing. So this leads one to suspect that not only did the dark side deep state Illuminati create this scam but the supposed ‘good guys’ allowed it to happen and in fact went along with it.

This points to a WORLD PLOT to take down the economic system of countries, force people into isolation, further suffering and wear masks limiting oxygen to their brains…(loosing brain cells) and causing other harm to their bodies… and countless other human suffering worldwide including the loss of small businesses everywhere.

The only difference between this scientist and others behind the scenes is that he is brave enough to come forward to announce his findings… better late than never. One wonders what took so long …not sure of the date of this video….

So not only CDC but the President current and former are accountable for prolonging the hoax… and countless others..So not only CDC but the President current and former are accountable for prolonging the hoax… and countless others… What this scientist did doubtless behind the scenes numerous scientists must have also done… It is NOT rocket science but simply due diligence when faced with a potential worldwide outbreak of …”something”…and certainly before calling “pandemic”.

They put the Nano/AI in chemtrails, our food, our water but according to a secret source they needed to break through the blood/brain barrier and get it into our bloodstream in order for the Nano/AI transhumanist agenda to work. So they created a “problem”=the flu packaged with Nano/AI and tracking…. Covid19 Tests (also containing Nano/AI and got a “reaction” – flu symptoms resulting in the body’s reaction to this poison bio-weapon concoction and then came up with their SOLUTION = VACCINE… to deal the final blow and get enough humans to take the vaccine so humanity is fully infected with the transhuman cocktail to then infect all others in their radius and the rest is history….

This is where the vaccines became their tried and true delivery system because ‘everyone loves vaccines” and trusts their doctors!

It is worth noting that Trump, his team, their AI/Looking Glass/NSA group knew all of this of course. The issue is for them they would be threatened with extinction by the dark side deep state if they didn’t play along.

From a previous post but worth repeating:

ACCORDING TO A SECRET SOURCE the prions found in the VACCINES are engineered to attach to NANO (also in the vax) and JUMP FROM PERSON TO PERSON…AS OF 5 YEARS AGO….(this is from a top scientist unnamed) AND the VAX contains covid19 (flu) which contains Nano AI… THIS IS A TRANSHUMAN AGENDA—Kerry Cassidy, Project Camelot

Also see my interviews with Cyrus Parsa for more on how Nano AI is contained in the bioweapon

AND the so-called vaccines are NOT Vaccines they are gene therapy intended to mutate your DNA. They are not really “trying” to kill masses but they are happy to have masses die as COLLATERAL DAMAGE…in order to jump to humanity 3.0 — a race of CYBORGS AND ANDROIDS….they know certain bloodlines and certain Genetics can handle this type of transition better than others… THIS IS THE REAL AGENDA AND FOCUS….the nano in chemtrails for the last 20 years has been preparing your bodies for this next step!

ADDENDUM: When people realize this is what is happening they can learn to MASTER their own bodies…through meditation and using the ORGONE/kunalini energy to shut down any “tech” installed…

We generate SCALER WAVES…I talk about this related to the VRIL….and Duncan O Finioan and the children killing a village of soldiers in Vietnam by linking hands. Of course many of us know this….for centuries…. Those who activate their kundalini like yogis and witches and warlocks, magicians of the dark and the light….

We are all magicians…CREATORS. AND OUR POWERS HAVE ONLY BEGUN TO BE TAPPED!!
I remember being very impressed back in August of 2020 by the info coming from Dr. Young, and the controversy as to whether the COVID19 virus actually existed. Looking at it all now from 5/14/21, it seems that Dr. Young was on the right track all along.
I posted a lot of that info back in August 2020 here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1373706&viewfull=1#post1373706

And the post following that which was a continuation:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1373707&viewfull=1#post1373707

It might be worth taking a second look ( or a first one, as the case may be) at those two posts, and at the following from Dr. Young which explains how the theory surrounding viruses and vaccines came about and how it was all wrong from the beginning:

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/who-had-their-finger-on-the-magic-of-life-antoine-bechamp-or-louis-pasteur?utm_campaign=2c148afa-2c43-4e97-9cee-87b09f05c3da&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&cid=8486780f-da1f-4521-b90f-6e16cd07da5c

Also see: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110506-Covid19-Cui-Bono-Is-there-an-agenda&p=1372459&viewfull=1#post1372459

and a new video from Dr. Young here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FQB8wtzhCKeN (https://www.bitchute.com/video/FQB8wtzhCKeN/?fbclid=IwAR0S3yH8iv4Q6UiVCEwhVJWmHZKeSuIDG3mTnKP0xrbIUW3SPbf0rMg_2b8)

FQB8wtzhCKeN

[onawah]

The so-called COVID virus is a chimera, it's 5 viruses that were combined in a lab as a bioweapon. (Which is why Dr. Robert Young, --see post above_-- was right).
Alex Jones talks about it here:
Damning video exposes the top project manager who organized gain of function studies in Wuhan, China
https://www.infowars.com/posts/real-life-bond-villain-klaus-schwab-wrote-the-script-for-covid-19-lockdown-takeover (https://www.infowars.com/posts/real-life-bond-villain-klaus-schwab-wrote-the-script-for-covid-19-lockdown-takeover/)

https://api.banned.video/embed/609ed55ac02c472ba91fd311

https://api.banned.video/embed/609af3cbb493572075b0c04a





Mod note from Bill:
Tried, but failed, to embed both banned.videos. It appears that only one can be embedded in any one post.
(Also note: it seems no text will show up in a post below where a banned.video has been embedded. So the embedded video has to be the final feature in any post.)

609af3cbb493572075b0c04a

[wondering]

I remember this specifically being talked about at the beginning of the whole COVID disaster...I think it was Judy Mikovits, and specifically the gain of function which we continued to fund in China...if we knew it then, why has it taken over year to get to this point? Of course I know the answer to that. But regardless, I am very happy to see it coming up again and in the MSM...dare we hope little sprouts of hopium are growing?

[onawah]

Real Life Bond Villain Klaus Schwab Wrote the Script for Covid-19 Lockdown Takeover
(Here's another one of those banned videos from Alex Jones)
68,752 views
May 14, 2021
The Alex Jones Show

"Alex Jones breaks down Klaus Schwab's playbook for the globalist takeover of society using Covid-19 as the reason to expand their authoritarian hold on humanity.
https://banned.video/watch?id=609ed55ac02c472ba91fd311
609ed55ac02c472ba91fd311

[Gwin Ru]

CDC Publishes 'Green Zone' Concentration Camp Protocol, Preparing Masses Imprisonment (https://rumble.com/vkt58j-cdc-publishes-green-zone-concentration-camp-protocol-preparing-masses-impri.html) 09:04

Stew Peters Show (https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters)
Published August 6, 2021


vi6z39



Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — They're telling you right in the WIDE OPEN!

The CDC is getting ready to transport "high risk" people to 'internment' camps, where they will be segregated for long periods of time.

Find the document here:


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
www.StewPeters.tv (http://www.StewPeters.tv)
www.DeAnnaLorraine.com (http://www.DeAnnaLorraine.com)

[Gwin Ru]

...

... Watch The Five Docs Monthly Round Up on a Special Critically Thinking with Dr T & Dr P (https://odysee.com/@CriticallyThinking:3/Critically_Thinking_with_Dr_T_and_Dr_P_Episode_59_5_Doc_Special:7) 1:22:48

August 21st, 202138 views

https://spee.ch/0/5920d43fe695a136.png?quality=85&height=100&width=0 (https://odysee.com/@CriticallyThinking:3) Critically Thinking with Dr T & Dr P
(https://odysee.com/@CriticallyThinking:3)@CriticallyThinking (https://odysee.com/@CriticallyThinking:3)

Join the Five Docs for their monthly podcast discussing an array of topics around the current global insanity.

https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/content/claims/Critically_Thinking_with_Dr_T_and_Dr_P_Episode_59_5_Doc_Special/7f02f20826369c3265be75fe5b01bd9991cfbe34/stream

https://odysee.com/@CriticallyThinking:3/Critically_Thinking_with_Dr_T_and_Dr_P_Episode_59_5_Doc_Special:7

[graciousb]

CDC Publishes 'Green Zone' Concentration Camp Protocol, Preparing Masses Imprisonment (https://rumble.com/vkt58j-cdc-publishes-green-zone-concentration-camp-protocol-preparing-masses-impri.html) 09:04

Stew Peters Show (https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters)
Published August 6, 2021


vi6z39



Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — They're telling you right in the WIDE OPEN!

The CDC is getting ready to transport "high risk" people to 'internment' camps, where they will be segregated for long periods of time.

Find the document here:


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
www.StewPeters.tv (http://www.StewPeters.tv)
www.DeAnnaLorraine.com (http://www.DeAnnaLorraine.com)

Someone I'm very close to works in ''simulation'' field, portraying patients etc for trainings. Because they are excellent at what they do and very fit, about 8 years ago they were chosen for a special assignment outside the medical field - to portray a regular citizen being ''extracted'' by both military and local police. It turned out to be a rather traumatic event, the subject was mildly injured by the process, and deeply shaken. In retrospect I believe this ''practice'' was for what is coming, and what has been long planned, (but which I'm convinced we have high level help to prevent also).

[Gwin Ru]

Most Important Video You’ll See / Watch / Listen / Share With Loved Ones (https://www.bitchute.com/video/Pz0SBTvKrDrV/) 14:18


Watch (https://www.bitchute.com/video/Pz0SBTvKrDrV/#video-watch)

First published at 00:27 UTC on September 5th, 2021.

SwampNugget (https://www.bitchute.com/channel/swampnugget/)
SwampNugget (https://www.bitchute.com/profile/PDDyupVoCcJ8/)


Pz0SBTvKrDrV



Dr. Bryan Ardis on Remdesivir

[pyrangello]

Local Detroit TV Asks for Stories of Unvaxxed Dying from COVID – Gets over 180K Responses of Vaccine Injured and Dead Instead

https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/local-detroit-tv-asks-for-stories-of-unvaxxed-dying-from-covid-gets-over-180k-responses-of-vaccine-injured-and-dead-instead/

Plus my uncles and cousins wife who passed away after the shot!

[Kryztian]

Why Italy was hit so hard by COVID a year ago, and another reason why you should not get the flu vaccine.

ZUqOCCkPlZZL

[Gwin Ru]

...

... this short video is probably already in a few threads on Avalon as it presents a swift summary of the lower rung criminals:
Accidental ownership of Wuhan, W.H.O. Gates, Glaxo, Pfizer, Fauci, Vaccines, Black Rock, Soros, Axa, Wintethur, Vanguard, Central Banks! (https://www.brighteon.com/698bda64-e06b-4a2a-9b4a-89d916a50e9c) 1:22

Signposts (https://www.brighteon.com/channels/littlesignpostpointingtheway)
Published 2 months ago |

Not only that it's all in house corruption when you understand how Fauci, Gates and Big Pharma own all patents on the virus and the vaccines!

698bda64-e06b-4a2a-9b4a-89d916a50e9c

[Gwin Ru]

...

... an example of mastery of data:

Below the Surface: An Interview with Whitney Webb (https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/WhitneyWebb:d) 1:41:44

October 11th, 202110,413 views

https://thumbnails.odysee.com/optimize/s:0:100/quality:85/plain/https://thumbnails.lbry.com/UCD2-QVBQi48RRQTD4Jhxu8w (https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2) Peak Prosperity
(https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2)@Chris_Martenson (https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2)

At Peak Prosperity we will interview anybody at any time about anything as long as we believe we have something we can learn from them. Today we are talking with investigative journalist Whitney Webb about media corruption and the webs of power underpinning current events and the impending Great Reset.

Whitney is one of the few remaining investigative journalists and is widely respected for her incisive analysis and fearlessness in digging below the surface. Her reporting is featured at her site, Unlimited Hangout, and she regularly writes for the Last American Vagabond.


https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/content/claims//WhitneyWebb/d510b804c8014400dbe4aed4e77e07298514630e/stream (https://odysee.com/$/signup?redirect=/@Chris_Martenson:2/WhitneyWebb:d)


(https://odysee.com/$/signup?redirect=/@Chris_Martenson:2/WhitneyWebb:d)

[Gwin Ru]

REVOLVING DOOR: All three FDA-authorized Operation Warp Speed vaccine corporations employ former FDA commissioners (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=244485)

by tts-admin (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?author=39262)
October 24, 2021 | Feature Posts (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?cat=77)

Donald Trump played a key role in either appointing former big pharma executives to the FDA or awarding the pharmaceutical companies top-tier spots in “Operation Warp Speed,”

Read More (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=244485)