Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness) [Archive] - Page 3

View Full Version : Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

Pages : 1 2 [3]

onawah

19th February 2021, 19:49

Bombshell interview: the link between EMFs and the current health crisis
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com
lloyd@electricsense.com
Feb 18, 2021

(The audio is still working here: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02/
...for about another 22 hours from the time of this posting. I will ask the Mods if it can be embedded and added to the library.)

From Bill: here's the audio:

https://hosting.instantteleseminar.com/audio/130820784165889-001.mp3

"Today, Thursday 18 February at 12 Noon ET (9 AM PT or 5 PM GMT) I’m interviewing Dr. Beverly Rubik.

She is the co-author of a new research paper entitled 'Evidence for a Connection Between C*****19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves'.

Warning: this interview is more sciencey than my usual interviews but hang on tight it's worth it.

To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02 (there's also a FREE 48-hour replay).

Listen to my interview with Dr. Beverly Rubik and discover:

How research shows that carrying your cell phone for just 45 minutes in a backpack (no calling or texting) can cause blood deterioration and stickiness

How this cell phone-induced blood deterioration can increase your risk of heart attacks and strokes (it’s worse if you use your phone)

How one of the main symptoms in the current health crisis is also blood deterioration, stickiness (keep reading, the plot thickens)

How Spanish researchers have found a correlation between 5 g and C19 (note: correlation, not causation)

How the focus with C19 is on the ‘vy-rus’ and ‘the person’ – little attention is being given to environmental stressors

How Dr. Beverly’s new research paper (as yet to be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal) reveals an ALARMING link between 5 g and C19

How too much calcium inside your cells (which wireless exposures are known to create) helps the ‘vy-rus’ to enter your cells

How Dr. Beverly’s research has identified 5 different ways that wireless exposures and C19 intersect – and the lack of oxygen being observed with C19 patients may be a result of poor blood flow

How wireless exposures+chemicals (pesticides, herbicides like glyphosate) are a ‘one-two punch’ assault on our bodies, then add in the ‘vy-rus’ can lead to the ‘knock-out’

How certain frequencies given over the Internet, can counteract the stress response (-ve effects) of wireless

The EMF meter that Dr. Beverly recommends, which can measure EMFs from wiring but also the lower part of the 5 G spectrum

How many of us are electron deficient (as demonstrated by blood analysis) – and a simple and quick daily practice which can remedy this

A wearable device that can offer some protection by boosting the energy field of the body – above all Dr. Beverly recommends a multi-faceted approach

The safer alternative to 5 G, which is faster and is not a biological hazard
A powerful supplement that helps the body fight the stress of wireless and also the disease of C19 (backed up by trials)

To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02 (if the page doesn't open just copy/paste this link in your browser).

You can also listen to the broadcast by telephone so you don't have to spend too much time in front of your computer - details will be on the interview page.

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!"
(You can still listen to the broadcast for 22 more hours from the time of this posting here:
https://electricsenseinterviews101.com/electricsense-interview-2021-18-02/ )

To read Dr. Beverly Rubik’s study in full click here: https://osf.io/9p8qu/

To make a DONATION to Dr Beverly’s non-profit lab click here: https://frontiersciences.org/contact-us.html (Dr Beverly really does need funding to carry on this important work. If everyone that came to this page made a donation of just a few dollars even, this would make a tremendous difference.)

For more information on Dr. Beverly click here: https://www.brubik.com/ "

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100537-Stop-5G-before-it-s-irreversible-&p=1412129&viewfull=1#post1412129

onawah

27th February 2021, 02:29

Vaccines Revealed Covid Edition Bonus re Homeopathy free online for 2 days
from support@vrevealed.com
2/26/21

"Cilla Whatcot is stepping up to the plate to share some brilliant solutions for maximizing immunity and what you can do to protect yourself and your family during the current health scare.

Her experience in homeopathic remedies and preventive solutions is broad and long-standing.

If you don’t know what homeopathy is, or if you don’t think it works. This is a must watch!

She reveals startling data and strategies that some countries have implemented with STUNNING success.

What are they and how can they benefit you? Cilla will share it all.

IT’S FREE TO WATCH HERE: https://vrevealed.com/covid/viewing/

With Purpose,
Dr. Patrick Gentempo"

Vaccines Revealed COVID Edition--Del Bigtree bonus today
There are still 2 &1/2 hours left today in which you can watch the bonus interview with Del Bigtree
Or the regular programming for today, with Dr. Brian Hooker or Tom O'Bryan D.C.
https://vrevealed.com/covid/viewing/

Tintin

27th February 2021, 19:29

Bombshell interview: the link between EMFs and the current health crisis
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com

...for about another 22 hours from the time of this posting. I will ask the Mods if it can be embedded and added to the library.)

From Bill: here's the audio:

https://hosting.instantteleseminar.com/audio/130820784165889-001.mp3

For those of you interested the study blueprint (Rubik and Brown) is available to download from here: https://osf.io/9p8qu/

Here's the interview video:

sV9Gs8WUbaOm/

Also downloadable from here: https://seed167.bitchute.com/SqrmDeyVnIHh/sV9Gs8WUbaOm.mp4

Tintin

3rd March 2021, 13:25

"Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding."

Source: The Critic (https://thecritic.co.uk/mutant-variations-and-the-danger-of-lockdowns/)

Given that we must never assume that a variant is conflated to more lethal as with respiratory viruses quite the opposite tends to be the case: viral lethality is often weakened as the virus struggles to remain effective as the environment (and/or host) starts to destabilise it. In the gene sequence it is NOT a given that each change is of necessary grave concern.

That said the article here does at least flirt with what would make good sense: by not exposing people to the omnipresent virus and bacteria laden environment in which we have been designed to cope and adapted so well to should inevitably make us more vulnerable to new 'strains' of anything; lockdowns are the very antithesis of good health practice may be but one takeaway here.

________________

Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns
Have non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdowns and social distancing, enabled more dangerous virus variants to thrive?

https://standfirst-thecriticmag-production.imgix.net/uploads/2021/03/GettyImages-1292617439.jpg

By Jemma Moran
2 March, 2021

t the beginning of 2020 we embarked upon a nationwide epidemiological experiment in an attempt to reduce the mortality burden of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. The premise of the experiment, though never formally defined, was to trial the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions with respect to the infection rate and subsequent death toll of an airborne respiratory virus.

The hypothesis was treated as a foregone conclusion and presented with little doubt. A significant reduction in person-to-person interactions within a population will lead to a decreased infection rate and reduce the number of deaths associated with the virus. The scientific community were so confident in this hypothesis that they did not present it as a hypothesis at all. The experiment was not defined as an experiment. The resulting data was subsequently ignored.

It’s easy to see why. Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding.

One year into the great experiment, we have a wealth of global data to inform our conclusions. This data largely contradicts the confident hypothesis with which we embarked upon this journey and has therefore been ignored. Scientists and politicians have clutched at straws, manipulated data or simply ignored the evidence in an attempt to safeguard the integrity of the original idea.

But the evidence is clear. The United Kingdom has implemented strict lockdown measures throughout the crisis, intermittently closing down the hospitality industry, mandating face coverings, enforcing social distancing and banning households from mixing. Our friends in Sweden had a much softer lockdown, only closing schools and colleges for older children, never mandating face coverings and keeping pubs and restaurants open throughout. Both the UK and Sweden have lived with SARS-CoV-2 for almost a year with very different results. The logic of our hypothesis dictates that Sweden should have seen a much higher number of coronavirus-related deaths (relative to their population) than the UK. The reality is that Sweden’s death rate is considerably lower.

This information alone is not enough to refute our hypothesis. We are only comparing two countries after all, and there are many other variables at play such as population density, climate and demography. Simply comparing data from two countries with two very different approaches to the situation is not enough to provide an answer. But it should be enough to warrant more questions.

Is there a correlation between the stringency of non-pharmaceutical interventions and the mortality burden of SARS-CoV-2? Perhaps the best source of data for this is the USA, where different states implemented different measures.

https://standfirst-thecriticmag-production.imgix.net/uploads/2021/03/Screenshot-2021-03-01-at-17.43.44.png?auto=compress,enhance,format&crop=faces,entropy,edges&fit=crop&w=1034&h=645

There are some caveats to this data. First, New Jersey, with the most “Covid deaths per million”, has the highest population density of all the states. Alaska has the lowest. The simple fact that the red lines on this graph do not cluster on the right extremity does not disprove the efficacy of lockdowns. Furthermore, there is no statistical difference between the lockdown average and non-lockdown average in this data, so no-one could claim that lockdowns lead to more Covid deaths based on this evidence alone.

South Dakota, with a very low population density, appears to buck the expected trend. Is this because of the lack of lockdown? Possibly. But Florida, with a very high population density (eighth in the country) appears much lower than it should, despite the lack of lockdown. Nebraska and Wyoming are both higher on this list than they should be, while Utah is a bit lower. Georgia and South Carolina are a little lower than we would expect, while Iowa and North Dakota are significantly higher. If we introduce climate as a factor, taking average temperatures into account, then we would expect to see North Dakota somewhere near the top, while New Jersey should be much lower down. There are many variables at play but the data should be sufficient to call the efficacy of lockdowns into question – especially given the high cost of such measures.

The reason we are so reluctant to accept that lockdowns and indeed other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have little to no impact on the mortality burden of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is that it’s difficult to find an explanation for it. However, rather than denying the evidence in the absence of an explanation, the evidence should drive us to reconsider what we know and apply our knowledge in a different way.

One possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions lies in our understanding of evolution. We all understand that humans evolved to become more intelligent over millions of years, but this did not happen by design. Humans that were born with larger brains owing to a random, spontaneous, genetic mutation had an advantage over those with smaller brains and were therefore more likely to survive and reproduce. The more intelligent “strain” of humans dominated and displaced the competition. But a species only evolves in this way when it is put under pressure. Without environmental challenges to overcome there would have been no fight for survival and the more intelligent “strains” of human beings would have had no advantage. In other words, if living on earth was easy we would still be apes.

In the microscopic world, genetic mutations are more common and therefore evolution happens at an accelerated rate. This is why doctors are reluctant to prescribe antibiotics since overuse of this intervention could lead to the evolution of superbugs.

Some people find this idea hard to grasp. Why and how are bacteria able to mutate in order to overcome threats to their existence? After all, they are not sentient. They do not understand their environment or “decide” to fight back. But in reality it is not the introduction of antibiotics that stimulates the mutation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These mutations are happening anyway, spontaneously, randomly. New bacterial variants are emerging all the time and some of them happen to be resistant to antibiotics. This would still be the case if antibiotics didn’t exist.

In a world without antibiotics, the antibiotic-resistant mutations do not have any advantage over other bacterial variants. They are a flash in the pan. Brief and rare. But when you introduce antibiotics into the mix, you confer an advantage on the antibiotic-resistant bacteria, allowing them to thrive, multiply, dominate and displace. This is why we have to be very careful with antibiotics and consider when it is appropriate and necessary to use them. Antibiotics save many lives, but if used irresponsibly over a long period of time they could wipe out a species.

Imagine if we were to administer antibiotics to every single member of society once a month to pre-empt any possible infections. It’s likely we would see a sharp reduction in bacteria-related mortality, such as bacterial pneumonia, but only in the short term. Infectious bacteria would quickly evolve into antibiotic-resistant superbugs, rendering our preventative interventions redundant and threatening the safety of everyone on earth.

Viruses and bacteria are not so very different. Just like bacteria, viruses mutate spontaneously and randomly, giving rise to thousands of different variants or mutations of the same virus. Most of these mutations make no difference to how the virus interacts with our immune system and confers no real advantage on the variant in question. However, some mutations may change the nature of the virus itself in the following key areas:

- Virulence: how likely the virus is to make us seriously ill, leading to an increased risk of hospitalisation and death;
- Transmissibility: how easily the virus is passed from one infected individual to another;
- Detectability: how easily the virus can be detected by certain methods of testing.

At present, there are over 4000 known variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some of these viruses will be less virulent than the original; others will be more virulent. Some will be more transmissible than the original; others will be less transmissible. Some will be more easily detected with PCR testing; others will be less easily detected.

All of these factors confer advantages and disadvantages on the variants in question, but the extent of these advantages is dependent on the pressures of the environment in which they exist. Non-pharmaceutical interventions have, for the first time, dramatically altered the context of that environment.

In any species, a mutation that leads to increased strength or intelligence is likely to be advantageous and will therefore dominate the competition and become more prevalent. In a hostile environment, the advantage of these mutations is exaggerated and the prevalence of advantageous genetic variants increases even more. This is how organisms evolve to deal with threats.

A more transmissible variant of a virus has a clear advantage over a less transmissible variant; but if we put pressure on the virus, we confer an even greater advantage on those more contagious variants.

Imagine two countries at war with one another. One has missiles with a range of 4000 miles, while the other has missiles with a range of 3500 miles. If the countries are only 3000 miles apart neither country has an advantage in the fight. Even though one set of missiles has a longer range, they are no more likely to find their target. Now apply this logic to two variations of a virus, one of which is more transmissible than the other. In an environment with regular close-contact between people as they gather in crowds, the more transmissible variant does not have such a distinct advantage over the others and is less likely to dominate and displace the less-transmissible variant. The less transmissible variant is still finding its target, infecting that person, making them sick and leaving them (in the vast majority of cases) with natural immunity, leaving the more transmissible variant with fewer targets to choose from.

In a world of social distancing, stay-at-home orders, face coverings and a ban on mass gatherings, we are no-doubt suppressing the virus. But we are conferring a greater advantage on the more transmissible variants of that virus. Effectively we are moving our two warring countries further apart so that only the longer-range missiles are able to find their targets. Suddenly it is clearer which of these countries will win the war. The more-transmissible viral variants will dominate and displace the less transmissible variants at an accelerated rate. In this way, it is possible that our efforts to suppress the virus are hastening the evolution of NPI-resistant variants, much like the use of antibiotics hastens the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

In the same way, some random, spontaneous mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus will be harder to detect with PCR testing due to differences in their spike protein, for example. If we rely on testing and tracing as a way of controlling the virus, then the less detectable variants will have an advantage over those we can identify, and they will become more prevalent.

Now to the most important aspect – virulence. In the context of normal human behaviour, variations that have mutated to become more virulent are at a distinct disadvantage. This is because, prior to 2020, we only stayed at home if we were too sick to go out. If we had a bit of a sore throat and a runny nose, we would still go to work. We would still go to school. We would still attend sports events, theatre, cinema, clubs, rock concerts, parties, festivals, protests and religious services. This meant that the more virulent strains, which were more likely to make people very ill, had a naturally occurring disadvantage compared with less virulent strains. This is why viruses usually evolve to become less deadly over time. The less virulent variants tend to dominate because we spread them more, infecting more people and conferring natural immunity before those people come into contact with a rarer, more virulent variant.

Non-pharmaceutical interventions have essentially levelled the playing field. If everyone is staying at home, regardless of how unwell they might feel, then the less virulent variants lose their advantage. Moreover, it could be argued that we are not levelling the playing field at all, but rather tipping the scales in favour of the more virulent variants. After all, while those with mild symptoms are confined to their homes, those with severe symptoms are forced to leave their homes and transition to a crowded environment full of vulnerable people. Hospital.

There is already some evidence emerging to support this theory. The Kent variant is reported to be more transmissible and more deadly, while the South Africa variant is more likely to make people severely ill. Is it a coincidence that the prevalence of these variants emerged in countries with very strict measures in place throughout the pandemic? Is it a coincidence that the Kent variant dominated following a period of regional and national UK lockdowns? If lockdowns are the key to stopping these dangerous mutations, then where is the Swedish variant? Where is the India variant?

The recent USA variant has been branded “the devil”, since it is thought to be more contagious and more likely to make people severely ill. But did this variant become prevalent in Florida or South Dakota where measures are more relaxed? No. It emerged in California following a sustained period of stay-at-home orders and business closures.

Could these subtle evolutionary mechanisms be the answer to the mystery of lockdowns? While we are reducing the spread of the virus, we are simultaneously encouraging the virus to become more virulent and more transmissible, thus negating any positive effect on the overall mortality burden and diminishing the returns of our interventions? Meanwhile, these interventions are destroying livelihoods, demolishing our culture, threatening our democracy and, by the government’s own admission, putting thousands of lives in danger.

There are still a great many unsolved mysteries in virology. This global experiment is shedding light on some of those mysteries and we have a collective responsibility to take heed of the evidence.

We cannot allow NPIs to become the “new normal”. This may be the equivalent of the widespread pre-emptive administration of antibiotics to healthy individuals. Evidence suggests that our old way of life was keeping us safe, protecting the NHS and saving lives, while our new way of life is in danger of ushering in a new era of deadly viral mutations that we cannot hope to control or treat. As in many areas of science, we are attempting to cheat death by manipulating nature (in this case, our own nature) and nature will eventually fight back. If we continue to play God, while ignoring the evidence and data, we may live to regret it.

Jemma Moran is Head of Communications for the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART (https://www.hartgroup.org/)), an independent group of doctors and academic experts who are working to widen the debate on Covid-19 policy.

kfm27917

3rd March 2021, 14:25

DaveToo

4th March 2021, 01:06

Our vaccine programme is world-beating and Covid-19 cases are plummeting, so why does the Deputy Chief Medical Officer keep sparking fear?

(from the UK)

Another week, another Covid variant on the loose. Watch out! I refer, of course, to the deeply worrying Whitehall variant.

The Whitehall variant is rapidly transmitted by scientific advisers whenever there is encouraging news. The better the news, the more aggressive the variant.

more at
https://www.sott.net/article/449543-New-variant-scare-tactics-are-an-own-goal

As I've mentioned in several posts already, we know their game plan.

If you study the charts from hundreds of countries, you see that most are showing a steady decline in CV cases and deaths.
But this was the case last summer before the (cough) second wave.

This is a remarkably robust 'virus'.

Expect to see third, fourth, fifth and six waves in the coming months.
Between tweaking the PCR test knobs and ever-changing variant viruses the pandemic
could continue indefinitely.

The pandemic will end when they want it to end, not before.

Gwin Ru

9th March 2021, 18:41

Vaccines - The Second Oldest Profession (https://henrymakow.com/2021/03/vaccines-the-oldest-scam.html)

henrymakow.com
March 9, 2021

https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/mullins-cover.jpg

In 1988, Eustace Mullins blew the whistle on the vaccine scam. Order the book here. (https://www.omnia-veritas.com/)

Not only do drugmakers make huge profits from vaccines, but they continue to profit from the illnesses vaccines cause.

If vaccines weren't harmful to health, why would pharmaceutical companies be
exempt from liability?

This goose has been laying a golden egg for more than a century, at an indescribable toll in human suffering. Now they want to make vaccinations - not one but regular shots - a condition for participation in society and freedom. And the new vaccines may trigger a fatal over-response on exposure to a virus. (https://rumble.com/vdww5v-dr-lee-merit-the-vaxx-is-preparing-the-world-for-a-mass-death-event.html)
"The practice of medicine may not be the world's oldest profession, but it is often seen to be operating on much the same principles."
Eustace Mullins
Updated from Nov 12, 2020
Excerpts from Murder by Injection (https://archive.org/stream/MurderByInjection.EustaceMullins/Murder%20by%20Injection.%20Eustace%20Mullins_djvu.txt) (1988)
by Eustace Mullins
(henrymakow.com)

Despite the great power of the hidden rulers, I found that only one group has the power to issue life or death sentences to any American -- our nation's physicians.

I discovered that these physicians, despite their great power, were themselves subjected to very strict controls over every aspect of their professional lives. These controls, surprisingly enough, were not wielded by any state or federal agency, although almost every other aspect of American life is now under the absolute control of the bureaucracy. The physicians have their own autocracy, a private trade association, the American Medical Association. This group, which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, had gradually built up its power until it assumed total control over medical schools and the accreditation of physicians.

----------------

From its earliest inception , the American Medical Association has had one principal objective, attaining and defending a total monopoly of the practice of medicine in the United States. From its outset, the AMA made allopathy the basis of its practice. Allopathy was a type of medicine whose practitioners had received training in a recognized academic school of medicine, and who relied heavily on surgical procedures and the use of medications.

--

https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/1679-eustace-mullins.jpg
(Eustace Mullins 1923-2010)

The practice of immunization goes directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, "immunization."

The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters, but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, "My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future." (p.79) --

Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana finds that "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person." (p.81)

--

Another well-known medical practitioner, Dr. J. M. Peebles of San Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says,
"The vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by the state, has not only become the chief menace and the greatest danger to the health of the rising generation, but likewise the crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest blots that disfigured the last century."
Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that the cowpox vaccine was one of the more peculiar "inventions or discoveries of the Age of Enlightenment." However, as I have pointed out in "The Curse of Canaan," the Age of Enlightenment was merely the latest program of the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years. Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as "The Society for Crippling Children." (p.81-82)

-----

https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/md-dance.jpg
(COVID scam perpetrated by the medical profession)

However, the peril of even one state legislature foiling their criminal conspiracy caused the Rockefeller Syndicate to concentrate on perfecting an instrument for controlling each and every state legislature in these United States. This was achieved by setting up the Council of State Governments in Chicago. Its ukases are routinely issued to every state legislator, and such is its totalitarian control that not one legislature has ever failed to follow its dictates.

Edward Jenner (1796-1839) "discovered" that cowpox vaccine would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth-century scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the century, due to a number of contributing factors.

After the use of the cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In 1872, 44,480 people were killed by it.

England finally banned the vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely heralded "contributions" which that country had made to modern medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its dangers were hurried off to jail. (p. 83) ----Polio has increased 700% in states which have compulsory vaccination. The much-quoted writer on medical problems, Morris Beale, who for years edited his informative publication, Capsule News Digest, from Capitol Hill, offered a standing reward during the years from 1954 to 1960 of $30,000, which he would pay to anyone who could prove that the polio vaccine was not a killer and a fraud. There were no takers.

https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/spanish-flu.jpg

Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. [I]The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called "the Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.

The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that "during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high."

In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other market, humans.

The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta, Georgia. Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter offered no serious threat in the election.

https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/nurse-scam.png
(In your face)

Suddenly, out of Atlanta, came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national immunization campaign against "swine flu." The fact that there was not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs, which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one bright young man remarked, "Well if the swine breeders won't inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into people."

The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at the Food and Ding Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public with his statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective." He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done. (84-85)

Tintin

14th March 2021, 16:11

"In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home. Regional differences in treatment methods and the natural course of the virus may also be major factors in this pandemic, and further studies are necessary to better understand it."

______________________

Stay‑at‑home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet‑based ecological study
R. F. Savaris,, G. Pumi, J. Dalzochio3 & R. Kunst

Nature Magazine Open Scientific Reports (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1.pdf)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1.pdf

Tintin

30th March 2021, 13:07

"Positive PCR is not evidence of infectiousness. Finding people who test positive but show no symptoms during an outbreak is often evidence of immunity, not evidence of transmission. Unfortunately, this has been largely overlooked in the current set of assumptions driving policy."
____________________

Many of us at the outset of this whole episode found much to be wary of regarding claims of "asymptomatic spread" and rightly so. It's oxymoronic in its presentation.

It, I would argue, also makes a total fallacy of the idea that facemasks serve any really useful purpose outside of a controlled healthcare setting which is just about the only environment in which they should ever be worn, and their use limited even there. Anybody advising otherwise is not to be wholly trusted, even if it "sort of makes sense".

And after 18 months of in-depth study (also the typical active life-cycle span of a respiratory virus' virility) and greater understanding of SARS-CoV-2 it now seems finally to have been acknowledged publicly that the notion of 'asymptomatic spread' was wrong. Whither 'R' numbers too?

Dr. John Lee, retired Professor of Pathology, here lays out a very good and easy to understand rescuing of medical health science from the jaws of the mendacious actors who have - and continue to - perpetuate pseudoscience to their gullible audiences, with very different aims in mind.

This article, particularly, helps to clarify the issue well.

___________________

Asymptomatic spread: who can really spread COVID-19?
By Dr John Lee
retired Professor of Pathology
March 27th, 2021

Source: https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ASYMPTOMATIC-SPREAD.pdf

A respiratory virus needs associated symptoms in order to be clinically relevant.

One year ago, this belief would have been universally accepted by the wider medical community.

The Health Secretary, addressing the nation on television on 20 December 2020 stated that ‘If you act like you have the virus, then that will stop it from spreading to others.’ This messaging is clear in the many adverts and public health announcements currently circulating.

The response to COVID-19 has been predicated on the assumption that asymptomatic PCR positive individuals can spread disease. This assumption was simply accepted as fact and, thus far, has never been adequately demonstrated in the available scientific evidence.

This single assumption is driving most of the restrictions. It is being repeated on radio and other advertisements and is causing the populace great fear and distress. It cannot be left unscrutinised any longer. If there are flaws in PCR testing regimes that have perpetuated this idea, we must now bring them to light.

The proportion of people who test positive but have no symptoms ranges from 4%1 to 76%.2 This is, in large part, a function of how testing has been carried out. If ‘asymptomatic COVID-19’ was a type of presentation of a disease, like a cough, then you would expect it to occur in the same percentage of the patients no matter where or when you measured it. The large range here demonstrates that it is not measuring a phenomenon related to the disease itself.

These are the three situations where someone can be ‘PCR positive’ but asymptomatic:

Pre-symptomatic – people who are in the incubation period of real disease and who go on shortly to develop symptomatic illness. For one to two days these people can transmit the virus to others and account for a maximum of 7% of spread.3

False Positive test results – people who test positive but are not really infected, the rate of which is unknown, but is estimated to be between 0.8% and 4% of all tests carried out.4 The number increases as Ct cycles are increased. Anything above 25 Ct is now considered ‘uninfectious’. When carrying out hundreds of thousands of tests, and including results up to Ct 30 as is the case in the Government surveys, we are going to inevitably have an enormous amount of false positives. A respiratory virus needs associated symptoms in order to be clinically relevant. One year ago, this belief would have been universally accepted by the wider medical community.

Immunity – people who have the virus ‘on board’ (detectable) but never develop symptoms. This category used to be referred to as “immunity” or “healthy people”. This occurs where, even if a virus is inhaled and present in the respiratory tract, the person is oblivious and remains completely well, as their immune system deals with the infection and they never develop symptoms. The evidence these individuals are a transmission risk is minimal.

Positive PCR is not evidence of infectiousness. Finding people who test positive but show no symptoms during an outbreak is often evidence of immunity, not evidence of transmission. Unfortunately, this has been largely overlooked in the current set of assumptions driving policy.

Evidence of transmission requires that an individual can be shown to be the source of infection for another person who then developed symptoms of a disease/illness.

Infectiousness or transmission of a virus requires active infection resulting in high levels of viral replication and shedding. Symptoms, such as coughing, are the real drivers of spread.

When the viral replication process is blocked by a healthy immune system, the virus is neutralised, preventing significant viral replication and shedding. This happens in approximately half the people exposed to the virus. Their immune system’s defences effectively ward off COVID-19 before it can take hold and cause symptomatic disease. It stops it dead in its tracks.

A review of all the published meta-analyses on asymptomatic transmission reveals that the same few studies have been recycled repeatedly by respectable institutions.5 On deeper inspection of the published studies we find that the evidence is of very poor quality. Robust evidence of asymptomatic spread is lacking and runs counter to all previous understanding of how respiratory viruses transmit.

The case studies cited as evidence of asymptomatic transmission amount to just 6 individuals who were alleged to have spread COVID-19 to 7 other people. The studies outlined below are the totality of the worldwide evidence for asymptomatic spread.

● Two of these case studies, originating from China, may well have been one patient,6 with the story repeated in separate publications.7 This was a situation where neither person involved in transmission had any symptoms. It therefore fails as evidence of disease spread, which requires the presence of symptoms.

● Two further cases of possible asymptomatic transmission were from Vo in Italy,8 where the whole town was tested. 1% of the tests were positive in the absence of symptoms. The Government’s own estimates for the percentage of tests that give a false positive result is between 0.8-4.0%9 and as this was a new test, a rate of 1% would have been very respectable. The alleged result of transmission was again claimed to cause ‘cases’ with no symptoms. These were likely false positive PCR test results, and assuming chains of transmission based on the degree of positivity of a test result is bad science.

● The final two examples were both from studies in Brunei.10 The evidence is weakened by a poor case definition (any symptom of any severity was considered real symptomatic COVID-19) and a high probability of false positive results. The first case was a father who remained asymptomatic but whose wife briefly had a runny nose and whose baby had a mild cough for one day. In the second case, a 13 yr old girl with no symptoms was alleged to have spread COVID-19 to a middle aged woman who had “a mild cough on one day”.11

It is therefore arguable that the asymptomatic diagnoses last spring were all due to false positive test results. No testing system is perfect.

Failure to acknowledge this and misinterpretation of positive results in patients with no symptoms has been hugely damaging.

It would not be unreasonable to state that the current extreme interventions are entirely based on the assumption of asymptomatic spread of disease, because otherwise simply requiring the symptomatic and their contacts to isolate would be sufficient.

Given that asymptomatic spread assumptions drive all of the other non-clinical interventions (mass-testing of healthy people, mandatory wearing of masks, social distancing and lockdowns), the evidence here must urgently be re-evaluated by policymakers.

Endnotes
1. Follow-up of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(20)30169-5/fulltext)
2. Three Quarters of People with SARS-CoV-2 Infection are Asymptomatic: Analysis of English Household
Survey Data (https://www.dovepress.com/three-quarters-of-people-with-sars-cov-2-infection-are-asymptomatic-an-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP)
3. Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 — Singapore, January 23–March 16, 2020 (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/87236)
4. Impact of false-positives and false-negative s in the UK’s COVID-19 RT-PCR testing programme (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895843/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf)
5. Covid: The woeful case for asymptomatic transmission (https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-the-woeful-case-for-asymptomatic-transmission/)
6. Secondary Transmission of Coronavirus Disease from Presymptomatic Persons, China (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-1142_article)
7. Modes of contact and risk of transmission in COVID-19 among close contacts (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042606v1)
8. Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2488-1)
9. Impact of false-positives and false-negative s in the UK’s COVID-19 RT-PCR testing programme (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895843/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf)
10. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Different Settings, Brunei (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/11/20-2263_article)
11. Asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and implications for mass gatherings (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300701/)

--------------------------

https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ASYMPTOMATIC-SPREAD.pdf

Matthew

31st March 2021, 17:47

Yet another great article

...to add to the pile.

----------===========---------

Cui Bono? The COVID-19 ‘Conspiracy’
Posted on FEBRUARY 19, 2021

Source: https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/02/19/cui-bono-the-covid-19-conspiracy/

What We Know
The Conspiracy Paradox
The Power of Nightmares
Capitalising on the Crisis
Disruption and Redeployment
The Emerging Ideology
Biosecurity as Cultic Practice
The Authoritarian State
Brave New World
The Time Given to Us

...

We know now that Government strategies for responding to a viral epidemic that had been in place for years were abandoned in favour of the historically unprecedented policy of national lockdown.
We know that Government contracts for the campaign of propaganda worth £119 million were signed with PR firms 3 weeks before the first lockdown.
We know that, in April 2020, the Cabinet Office approved over £216 million for advertising on what it called the ‘COVID-19 Campaign 20/21’.
We know that the criteria for attributing deaths to COVID-19 were changed back in March to exaggerate the official number of fatalities.
We know that 95 per cent of the deaths attributed to the disease are of people with pre-existing health conditions like cancer, dementia, heart disease or diabetes.
We know that 84 per cent are over 70 years of age, and that the average age of those whose deaths are attributed to COVID-19 is the average age of death in the UK.
We know that, a year into this so-called ‘pandemic’, just over 600 patients under the age of 60 without a pre-existing health condition have had their deaths in English hospitals attributed to COVID-19.
...

It presents a long and detailed list with links to cross-reference msm sources

gnostic9

3rd April 2021, 01:27

James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

Love peace and joy to all

Delight

3rd April 2021, 02:27

upjmPDmYJqay/

2gvflyjYZRi9

Tintin

3rd April 2021, 12:35

James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

Love peace and joy to all

:bump: bumpity :bump:

This is an excellent MUST LISTEN presentation of solid scientific facts from Mike Yeadon here; it could serve as a primer for anybody unfamiliar with the concepts, which would amount - sadly - to far too many people.

Anybody umming and ahhing about whether to get a vaccine will be much better informed by taking the time (just over an hour) to listen to this and better still share it widely.

:flower:

-----------------

Original source: The Delingpod (https://delingpole.podbean.com/e/dr-mike-yeadon-1617215402/)

Matthew

4th April 2021, 09:22

Tintin

7th April 2021, 13:30

I'll make some effort to try and pull together all the posts on this Twitter thread (https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1376932368498499587) into one sensible summary page or two, but in the meantime can suggest that all be reminded, if they haven't already figured this out, that viewed through the lens of eugenics and some knowledge of the background of the individuals and architects behind this aptly named Plandemic is the cipher: all roads ultimately lead there, with its shocking denouement.

Understand this, and then educate anybody who still isn't clear about it. It can of course be halted by globally collectivising against it, but knowledge is crucial here.

As I wrote on our PA Twitter feed earlier, in response:

"This is the BEST summary of the zeitgeist I've yet seen, anywhere. A pocket guide that should be on the state curriculum. Some of us have known early on that it has all (CV19) been openly about eugenics - this thread nails it. Kudos."

1379742816029540352

EarthGirl

12th April 2021, 20:30

Bumping this again for the reason that Dr Mike Yeadon explains variants using the analogy of a "Baseball Cap"... starting at 36mins...

Dr Mike checked the molecular biology and it's one of the largest viruses ever sequenced, 10,000 amino acids (the building blocks of protein)

"The most different variant, that I can find, is 27 amino acids away... so its 99.7% identical. The human immune system is much cleverer than that. It's impossible for a variant that differs by .3% to evade immunity"

Dr mike calls Bu****it...

"Get your baseball cap and put it on, your family knows you and loves you, so a .3% change in your appearance to mimic a variant means putting it on backwards"

"I'm just pointing out that a .3% change in a complex organism that is James Dellingpole or Mike Yeadon is now a different person is what the government are trying to get you to believe with these variants..."

It's not the exact wording but you get the gist x

James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

Love peace and joy to all

:bump: bumpity :bump:

This is an excellent MUST LISTEN presentation of solid scientific facts from Mike Yeadon here; it could serve as a primer for anybody unfamiliar with the concepts, which would amount - sadly - to far too many people.

Anybody umming and ahhing about whether to get a vaccine will be much better informed by taking the time (just over an hour) to listen to this and better still share it widely.

:flower:

-----------------

Original source: The Delingpod (https://delingpole.podbean.com/e/dr-mike-yeadon-1617215402/)

Double bump with rainbows and a choral choir going ahhhhhhhhhh

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4

Tintin

22nd April 2021, 15:54

1385239830729306114

pueblo

22nd April 2021, 18:30

This video is huge! It breaks down exactly how the excess death mortality figures for Ireland have been manipulated by the state broadcaster, RTE, which is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the government.

It's all just smoke and mirrors. Lying s***s.

Video is about 15mins long.

Direct link to video... https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/Mainstream-News-Dissected-in-a-Scientific-and-Data-Centric-Manner:e

Video is at bottom of tweet..'.Mainstream News Dissected'
https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1385142479628943360?s=20

Tintin

26th April 2021, 17:32

Ah, so the multi-million pound bulging boutique PR companies being used by the UK government simply went on a stealing spree.....

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/40/ff/04/40ff047f3cedcaa123cf96430f17167d.jpg

(Some have avered whether these people at GenesisPR (https://genesispr.co.uk/) are the main protagonists behind these awful government adverts and slogans.)

Tintin

3rd May 2021, 14:00

A tremendous 40 or so minutes of grounded critique of the adoption of the global narratives, corruption of science, and some simple to understand epidemiological data that would leave the skeptical in absolutely no doubt at all that they were correct to question the official 'story', the official statistics and many other substrates.

Dr. John Lee has over 30 years experience in the NHS and for anybody not awake yet, I'd suggest this would be as good an introduction as well as overview as you might find.

________

Description:
Unlocked Exclusive — in a hard-hitting interview, retired NHS pathologist Dr John Lee discusses the government’s response to the pandemic, analyses why proven scientific procedures were abandoned, makes the case for ending Lockdown now, and asks the question most doctors are unable to discuss in public.

Covid-19: is the cure worse than the disease?

spmPax0rq5A

Tintin

3rd June 2021, 15:20

"“Flu year” versus calendar year: Many calculate mortality statistics according to the Gregorian calendar, but December 31st is not a meaningful end date for winter mortality in the northern hemisphere. The flu wave and the associated wave of mortality reach the peak at various dates, and sometimes secondary waves appear. Furthermore, the use of the Gregorian calendar combines the mortality in the first part of one winter (sometimes mild) with mortality in the second part of the previous winter (sometimes severe). There is no scientific justification for this grouping when analyzing historical trends.

The statistical alternative, which may be called “flu year”, contains a full winter season. Annual mortality is calculated from the beginning of the flu season, which is usually counted from week 40 (early October), till week 39 in the following year (end of September). Thus, the coronavirus waves in the spring and summer of 2020 belong to the 2019–2020 flu year, whereas the last winter wave belongs to the current flu year which will end in September."

- Eyal Shahar, May 29 2021

-----------------

Not a shred of doubt: Sweden was right

Source: Eyal Shahar on Medium (https://shahar-26393.medium.com/not-a-shred-of-doubt-sweden-was-right-32e6dab1f47a)

Counting the dead used to be the work of epidemiologists, statisticians and demographers. So was analyzing the numbers and drawing conclusions. In the past year many are counting deaths, but the numbers have no meaning without the context of a relevant time period, population and history. That is, epidemiology.
The most counted country is probably Sweden, a stubborn dissenter that refused lockdowns, mask mandates and contact tracing. By the time of this writing, 14,349 Swedes have reportedly died from the coronavirus. Has the Swedish model failed? Were the lockdowns justified? Were the economic and social upheavals in most of the world an unavoidable necessity?

The answer to all is a resounding no. The first (and not the only) witness: Sweden. To understand the testimony, we need to learn only two concepts: “flu year” and “excess mortality”.

“Flu year” versus calendar year
Many calculate mortality statistics according to the Gregorian calendar, but December 31st is not a meaningful end date for winter mortality in the northern hemisphere. The flu wave and the associated wave of mortality reach the peak at various dates, and sometimes secondary waves appear. Furthermore, the use of the Gregorian calendar combines the mortality in the first part of one winter (sometimes mild) with mortality in the second part of the previous winter (sometimes severe).

There is no scientific justification for this grouping when analyzing historical trends.
The statistical alternative, which may be called “flu year”, contains a full winter season. Annual mortality is calculated from the beginning of the flu season, which is usually counted from week 40 (early October), till week 39 in the following year (end of September). Thus, the coronavirus waves in the spring and summer of 2020 belong to the 2019–2020 flu year, whereas the last winter wave belongs to the current flu year which will end in September.

Excess mortality
The concept of “excess mortality” is a little abstract. We need to compare actual mortality with “expected mortality”, but the latter is a theoretical idea that cannot be verified: what would the mortality in the 2019–2020 flu year have been, had there not been a pandemic? How do we calculate “expected mortality”?
One method uses a statistical model called linear regression. We fit a line to the mortality data from previous years, check its past performance, and use the continuation of the line to compute expected mortality. The distance between a data point of actual mortality and expected mortality on the line is excess mortality (or “mortality deficit”).

Mortality in Sweden by flu year
The graph shows the annual mortality in Sweden per million people in the last 22 flu years, where each flu year is labeled according to the calendar year in which it ends. For example, the last data point on the graph is mortality between October 2019 and September 2020: 9,234 per million people (95,365 deaths). To magnify, the vertical axis starts at 7,000.

https://miro.medium.com/max/1916/1*C9en4bULrelzv0lpLIJbOQ.jpeg

It is easy to see that the points are located close to a straight line, until the flu year that ended in September 2018. The general downward trend reflects a consistent increase in life expectancy in Sweden for many years.

Experienced data analysts will attest that the fluctuations around the line are generally small and expected until 2018 (explained variation: 0.96). In contrast, both the flu year that preceded the pandemic (2018–2019) and the pandemic year (2019–2020) substantially deviate from the line: the former — in lower than expected mortality, and the latter — in higher than expected mortality.

Excess mortality in Sweden in flu year 2019–2020
Continuation of the line, which was fit by the statistical model, yields the following estimates: In 2018–2019 there was “mortality deficit” in Sweden of 300 per million people (-3.3%) whereas in 2019–2020, the pandemic year, there was excess mortality of 364 per million people (+4.1%). Excess mortality following mortality deficit, and vice versa, are well known and expected, as the main source of mortality is an elderly population with limited life expectancy. (The sequence “excess after deficit” is, of course, better than the reverse order.)

Assuming the excess mortality in 2019–2020 “fully balanced” the mortality deficit in the previous flu year, the true excess mortality in Sweden was less than 1% (about 700 deaths). And if we assume, absurdly, that the mortality in 2019–2020 was not affected at all by the mortality deficit in the previous flu year, then the excess mortality in Sweden did not exceed 4.1% (about 3,800 deaths). Excess mortality of a few percentage points, or more, has been calculated in many countries where life has been severely disrupted. Part of that excess has been attributed to lockdown and panic.

To remind us, the hysterical response to the pandemic was not due to fear of an excess annual mortality of 4% or even 10%. The apocalyptic forecasts, which caused the world to shut down, predicted about 90,000 deaths from the coronavirus in Sweden by the summer of 2020: 100% excess mortality! No wonder policy makers around the world prefer to forget those predictions.

https://miro.medium.com/max/868/1*IPgJOW1cQ-GoOsrnqwQ4yg.jpeg

Mortality in Sweden in the current flu year
The final summary of the current flu year (October 2020 — September 2021) will be known in the fall, but the data accumulated more than halfway through allow for interim conclusions. As many know, the coronavirus replaced the flu viruses this year, and there was no flu in Sweden, either. Nor were there apocalyptic predictions; only warnings about the number of accumulated deaths.

I chose to compare the mortality in Sweden in the current flu year (week 40, 2020 till week 15, 2021) to the corresponding mortality in 2017–2018. Two reasons for this choice: First, Europe experienced a severe flu season in that winter, which makes it an appropriate comparison. Second, although the flu season was severe in Sweden compared to previous years, it was still substantially milder than in Europe as a whole.

The graph shows a low mortality wave at the end of 2017 and a noticeable wave in February-March 2018 (another example of why a December 31st cutoff might distort historical trends). This winter, the mortality wave coincided with the coronavirus wave and its peak in late December. (In 2020 there were 53 weeks, so the dates do not exactly match.) A secondary coronavirus wave, which appeared in mid-February, half way through the decline of the former, did not result in a secondary mortality wave.

https://miro.medium.com/max/868/1*yVzc0DkTufslYR89rTpU7A.jpeg

The all-cause death toll in Sweden in the first 29 weeks of the current flu year is 56,452 (5,441 per million people) compared to 55,967 (5,544 per million people) in the same period in 2017–2018. In that winter, the excess mortality rate in Europe attributed to the flu was at least twice as high as in Sweden.
Sweden proved right in the retest.

A colossal mistake
The pandemic has taken its death toll, ranging from large to small in different countries and within countries, and mostly affected the frail elderly. But the lockdowns and panic were unsubstantiated, prevented nothing, and caused indescribable damage to society. Sweden’s statistics tell us, unequivocally, that in much of the world lives have been lost and livelihoods have been destroyed — in vain.

Will anyone, in any country, be held accountable?

Rawhide68

3rd June 2021, 21:02

Thanks for posting Tintin, I'm Swedish and will read your article in detail at a later moment, need to warm up my school English brain synapsis to be able to try comprehend words such as " unequivocally "and such.

Pub's & Restaurants can server alcohol until 10 pm from June 1st in Sweden, (It was 8 pm before) I just tried it out tonight, met a friend, played some bowling, and finished dinner at 9 pm in a local chineese restaurant before I went home.

onawah

6th June 2021, 21:22

COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease
Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 06, 2021
Download PDF:https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2021/May/PDF/stephanie-seneff-covid-vaccine-pdf.pdf

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/06/stephanie-seneff-covid-vaccine.aspx?

(Video at the foot of the post)

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through all Phase 2 and 3 clinical phases of testing
The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible to assess safety and efficacy, as the vaccine has not been adequately tested
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Research shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated
Another study shows that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate
In the next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure

Dr. Mercola Interviews the Experts
This article is part of a weekly series in which Dr. Mercola interviews various experts on a variety of health issues. To see more expert interviews, click here:https://interviews.mercola.com/

In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19 vaccines. Since 2008, her primary focus has been glyphosate and sulfur, but in the last year, she took a deep-dive into the science of these novel injections and recently published an excellent paper1 on this topic.

“To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it's an insanely reckless thing that they've done,” she says. “My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].

So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who've developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don't see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you weigh the good against the bad, I can't see how they could possibly be winning, from what I've seen.”

Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Seneff cites research2 showing deaths are 14.6 times more frequent during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated. That is extraordinary. You can read the full paper here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/expert-evaluation-on-adverse-effects-of-the-pfizer-covid-19-vaccination/

xSrc_s2Gqfw

Other data,3,4 reviewed in the video above, show that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. Interestingly, Seneff believes she may have discovered why. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate.

“I immediately suspected glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,” Seneff says. “I've written a book on glyphosate called ‘Toxic Legacy,’ and I have an entire chapter in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a train wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is weak, your body has to overreact to the virus. It can't kill the virus.

So, it ends up [causing] collateral damage and wrecking your tissues. You get into this cytokine storm kind of situation where you destroy your lungs and you can't cope. It's not really the virus. It's the immune reaction to the virus that's killing you, and that's because your immune system is too weak. If you have a strong innate immune system, I believe you wouldn't even get symptoms from COVID-19.

When you look at the statistics on which countries are hit hard and just can't get ahead of this virus, they're clearly the countries that use a lot of glyphosate and developing biofuels based on glyphosate-exposed plants. So, I think that's a critical piece of the puzzle as well. Glyphosate is in the atmosphere … [and] people are breathing it. So now you're getting a direct attack on the lungs immune system, which makes you very susceptible to COVID.”

Ultimately, Seneff believes, as I do, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will end up killing far more people than the disease itself, and will in fact make the disease worse. Seneff cites a disturbing case history of a cancer patient in the U.K. who was treated for severe COVID-19 for 101 days.

The antibody cocktails they gave him didn’t work, and after his death, they concluded that the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in his body had a dozen different mutations in the spike protein. Somehow, his body figured out how to evade the antibodies, which is a critical piece of the puzzle.

“I think the vaccines are doing the same thing,” Seneff says, adding that, among the immune compromised, only 17% of vaccinated individuals actually produce antibodies.5 Surprisingly, these people may actually have drawn the short end of the stick. The antibodies may not work because their immune function is low, thereby allowing the virus to build resistance and mutate.

“I think you have a lot of immune compromised people in a country where glyphosate is destroying people’s immune system, and that gives tremendous opportunity for the virus to mutate. The vaccine is going to accelerate that process because we're vaccinating immune compromised people left and right.”

COVID-19 Vaccines Are a Public Health Disaster
The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through phases 2 and 3 of clinical testing.

The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible for this vaccine to be adequately tested for safety and efficacy.

Hundreds of millions of people are now being vaccinated around the world, based on nothing more than preliminary efficacy data. Disturbingly, while sudden death is one apparent side effect, the vast majority of side effects won’t be known until a decade or more from now.

Seneff predicts that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a sudden spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.

“It’s a nightmare,” she says. “And I can see how it can happen. Basically, the vaccine is so unbelievably unnatural, and it has a single-minded goal, which is to get your body to produce antibodies to the spike protein. The RNA has been manipulated. It's not natural RNA because it has methyl-pseudouridine on it … And the goal is to keep it alive.

Normally, if you get injected with RNA, you have enzymes in your system, in your tissues, that will immediately break it down. Your body knows it must get rid of the RNA. What you do with the vaccine is you make sure [your body] can't get at it …

Then there's the lipid [that the RNA is encased in]. The lipids are very abnormal, very weird … They're not natural but they have some cholesterol in there, probably to help it look like a natural LDL particle so that your cells will take it up. It's not being taken up by the ACE2 receptor.

It's not being taken up the same way that the virus is being taken up. It's a totally different mechanism that brings it into all the cells. You've gone past all the mucosal membranes. Usually, a virus is going to come into the lungs or any kind of cavity where there's a mucosal system that's going to hit the virus first.

The virus [will trigger] your natural mucosal system to respond to it and clear it if you're a healthy person, and that's the end of it. [With the vaccine], we never get a chance to do that. You're just getting it shot right into your muscle, past all the barriers and the muscle goes crazy … sending out all kinds of alarms.”

Understanding Your Immune System
As your cells start producing the viral spike proteins, your immune cells rally to mop up the proteins and dump them into your lymphatic system. This is why many report swollen lymph nodes under the arms. This is also a sign of breast cancer. The antibody response is part of your humoral immunity. You also have cellular immunity, which is part of your innate immune system.

Your innate immune system is very powerful. And, if you're healthy, it can clear viruses without ever producing a single antibody. Antibodies are actually a second-tier effect when your innate immune system fails. The problem is your innate immune system is definitely going to fail if you get a COVID-19 shot, because it’s bypassing all of the areas where your innate immune system would be brought to bear.

Your body will essentially believe that the innate immune system has failed, which means it must bring in the backup cavalry. In essence, your body is now over-reacting to something that isn’t true. You’re not actually infected with a virus and your innate immune system has not failed, but your body is forced to respond as if both are true.

How COVID-19 Vaccine Circumvents Healthy Immune Responses
But there’s more. As explained by Seneff, the synthetic RNA in the mRNA vaccines contains a nucleotide called methyl-pseudouridine, which your body cannot break down, and the RNA is programmed to trigger maximum protein production. So, we’re looking at completely untested manipulation of RNA.

It is very important to recognize that this is a genetically engineered mRNA for the spike protein. It is in no way shape or form the same that SARS-CoV-2 produces. It’s been significantly altered to avoid being metabolized by your body. Additionally, the spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA locks into your ACE2 receptor.

This is because the genetically engineered NEW spike protein has additional prolines inserted that prevent the receptors from properly closing, which then cause you to downregulate ACE2. That’s partially how you end up with problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.6,7

As noted in a 2020 paper,8 there’s a “pivotal link” between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. People with ACE2 deficiency tend to be more prone to severe COVID-19. The spike protein suppresses ACE2,9 making the deficiency even worse. As it turns out, the vaccines essentially do the same thing.

How Long Might Effects Last?
As mentioned, RNA is highly perishable, so to get it past the enzymes that would normally break down free mRNA, it’s encased in a lipid nanoparticle combined with polyethylene glycol or PEG. The PEG helps protect the RNA from breaking down. The RNA can easily enter the cell via natural endocytosis pathways, taking advantage of the nanoparticle design made to look like an LDL particle.

They strategically chose a cationic lipid, meaning it’s positively charged. “Usually you have phospholipids in your membranes that are negatively charged,” Seneff explains. The problem with cationic lipids is they disturb the plasma membrane and cause an immune response.

However, that may also be a key reason for why they were used. Typically, conventional vaccines contain an aluminum adjuvant to initiate an immune response. Aluminum was not appropriate for the COVID-19 vaccines, but the cationic lipids serve a similar function spectacularly well.

Being extremely toxic to the cell membranes, the positively charged lipids trigger immune cells to rush in to aid the cells and mop up the spike protein now being produced, while also being the vehicle that allows the RNA to slip into the cells. Once inside the cell, the mRNA delivers the instructions to produce enormous amounts of spike proteins.

The really worrisome thing is there's potential for it to become part of the DNA and then it will last forever. ~ Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.
Importantly, there’s no telling how long these instructions will persist. Manufacturers are guessing the synthetic RNA may survive in the human body for about six months, but we really don’t know if that’s true or not.

Again, the alterations they’ve done to the synthetic RNA are meant to prevent it from breaking down. It could be years or even decades that these spike proteins are being produced, and you will find out shortly why this is a really bad scenario.

“The really worrisome thing, which I talk about in the paper, is there's potential for it to become integrated into your DNA,” Seneff says. “If that happens, it will last your entire lifetime, and you may pass this new genetic code on to your offspring.”

Tracing Spike Protein From Cells to Lymph to Spleen
As explained by Seneff, your immune cells mop up mRNA and spike protein and dump them into your lymphatic system. From there, they make their way into your spleen, where they can remain for quite a long time.

“There are all these different immune cells that have different roles, but it's the dendritic cells and the macrophages that are initially going into the muscle, picking up the mRNA, taking it over to the lymph system, traveling through the lymph system to the spleen and piling it up there. The spleen was the highest concentration of all the organs they looked at in animal studies. The liver was second.

It wasn’t the COVID-19 vaccine, but it was a messenger RNA vaccine. So, it was the same concept. The other vaccines, the ones that are based on a DNA vector, they also go to the spleen. I think they like it when they see that it's going to the spleen because you have these germinal centers in the spleen that are focus groups for making antibodies.

So these dendritic cells are in these germinal centers in the spleen, and then they bring in the B-cells and T-cells, and those are the ones that make and perfect the antibodies, because you need to go through a whole training mode to get the antibiotics to be exactly matched to that particular spike protein. That happens predominantly in the spleen.”

Potential Vaccine Shedding Mechanism Revealed
Seneff also sheds light on the mysterious reports of unvaccinated individuals experiencing unusual bleeding symptoms after spending time in proximity to a newly vaccinated person. She believes this may be due to exosomes being released from the lungs.

“If you are a person who's producing these exosomes from your spleen and shipping them out, there's no reason why you can't ship them out to the lungs. In fact, they've shown experimentally that those exosomes do get released from the lungs,” Seneff says.

So, to be clear, what's being “shed” or spread by vaccinated individuals is the spike protein — which is itself toxic — not the SARS-CoV-2. So, it’s not an infection but rather the shedding of a toxic protein.

“If you're breathing it in, you could be getting an increased risk, it seems to me. I mean, it sounds really farfetched, but it looks like it could happen, just from the logic of what goes on in biology. It could happen that you would breathe in these exosomes containing these misfolded prion proteins, which are not good for you, and exactly what happens when they go into the lungs, I don't know. I have no idea.”

Can mRNA Vaccines Change Your DNA? That Is the Question
Getting back to the potential issue of gene editing, I’ve been accused of being scientifically ignorant for stating that COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines but rather a form of gene therapy. But when you delve into the genetics and molecular biology of this vaccine you discover that they are in fact a form of a stealth gene editing tool that can change your DNA and integrate instructions to make even more spike proteins.

It’s counterintuitive because, typically, mRNA cannot be integrated directly into your genes because you need reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase converts RNA back into DNA (reverse transcription). Seneff, however, discovered there’s a wide variety of reverse transcriptase systems already embedded in our DNA, which makes this possible. She explains:

“There was this long period of time in which we had the mantra that transcription is DNA to RNA to protein. That's basic biology — DNA, RNA, protein. But then, in 1970, David Baltimore at MIT… discovered reverse transcriptase in retroviruses (RNA tumor viruses), which he won the Nobel Prize for.

It turns out, and I didn't know this until I started digging into these vaccines, that we actually have plenty of reverse transcriptase in our own cells. We have plenty of it. And it's these long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) that are able to take our RNA back to DNA and to put that DNA back into the genome.”

LINEs and SINEs are sequences of nucleotides, pieces of DNA, and they make up a huge percentage of the genome. For example, LINE1 is 10% of your genome. Most of the time they're inactive and scientists were puzzled about what they actually do. They’re rather strange, as they fold DNA backward and stick it back in different areas. For example, in people with Alzheimer's, the amyloid beta protein gets duplicated all over the place in their genome.

“They get like a big fat genome with extra copies with different variations in those copies. And they do that through RNA,” Seneff says. “So, you have a mechanism for evolution. The primary mechanism, I would guess, is through taking the DNA, turning it into RNA, mutating the RNA because RNA mutates much more easily than DNA does, and then turning it back into DNA and sticking it back into the genome.”

In a nutshell, LINEs and SINEs appear to be activated when an alternative solution for a problem is needed. One such problem could be glyphosate exposure. When the body is too sick to function normally, it finds a way around the problem by mutating proteins. “It's a process that we use to deal with environmental toxic chemicals that we're confronted with generally,” Seneff says.

So, in summary, mRNA can be reverse transcribed and converted back to DNA by LINEs and SINEs in your body. This cloned DNA can then be integrated into your genome. In this way, it truly is genetic editing.

Are We Creating a Generation of Super-Spreaders?
What comes next is truly chilling. Seneff cites research10 showing that sperm has this ability to take exogenous mRNA, either from a virus or an mRNA vaccine, and reverse transcribe it into DNA and then produce plasmids that contain this cloned DNA. The sperm then releases these plasmids around the egg, which takes them up.

The egg hangs on to those plasmids and puts the new code into the cells of the growing fetus. Hypothetically, a man having been vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine could produce a child born with the genetic code to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

This is not a good thing, because this means the child will not have antibodies against the spike protein. Since it’s part of their genetic code, it registers as one of their own proteins and their body won’t produce antibodies against it. If that child is exposed to SARS-CoV-2, their immune system won’t react at all. What happens next is anyone’s guess, but it’s bound to be severely problematic in one way or another.

“Exactly how sick they'll get or whether they'll get sick at all, I don't know,” Seneff says, “but their immune system won't react and they'll be able to carry that virus for their entire life and then pass [that genomic trait] on down to their children …

Now, if I don't react to [the virus] and I let it grow, what happens? Do I get sick? To what extent is the illness [COVID-19] the consequence of the immune response, rather than the virus itself? We don't know that, really, but many say the real problem is the overactive immune response.

People are dying of the immune response to COVID, they're not dying from the virus. The virus is not killing them. It's the immune response to the virus that's killing them. So, if you don't have an immune response, what happens? Nobody knows.”

Even if such a child were to be unaffected by the virus, we could be looking at a serious problem, as they could turn into lifelong super-spreaders and a chronic hazard to everyone around them. At least that’s what happened in cows.

Seneff recounts a story of herds plagued by a viral diarrhea. They finally realized that “killer calves” were the problem. Calves were being born that had viral protein integrated into their genome. When exposed to the virus, these calves, unable to clear the virus naturally, then spread it to the adult cows, which got sick.

“I don't see why the same thing couldn't happen with COVID — that a baby could be born who has this humanized version of that protein, catches the [wild] virus and then it spreads it to the adult population,” Seneff says.

Such children would be true super-spreaders, and the indoctrination we’re currently seeing, where children are told their mere presence could pose a mortal risk to the people they love, would then turn into grim reality. The calves in question were euthanized to safeguard the rest of the herds. How would we address human equivalents?

Hopefully, this nightmare scenario will not occur, but it appears biologically possible, and that is the problem. The fact that the available science allows for this kind of speculation is reason enough to put the brakes on this vaccination campaign. We have no clue what the long-term consequences are. We don't even know what the short-term consequences are, other than more vaccinated people are dying, collectively, compared to unvaccinated ones.

Spike Protein Appears Highly Problematic
A particularly fascinating part of Seneff’s paper addresses the toxicity of the spike protein. A key problem with all of these gene-based COVID-19 vaccines is that the spike protein itself appears toxic, and your body is now a spike protein-producing factory.

“Right. They have done studies where they only expose the [animal] to the spike protein, showing it was toxic in the brain and the blood vessels. So, it's causing immune reactions all by itself that is damaging to the tissues.

It's basically a toxic molecule, and I think it's toxic possibly because of it being a prion protein …

I'm going to do more research on it. I don't know enough yet, but it looks horrendous to me. I think it may be the most worrisome thing. There are two big things that are going to happen in the future.

They're going to take time [to develop], so we're not going to see it immediately. And, of course, we're not going to blame the vaccine because rates will start going up for these horrible diseases and no one will link them to it.”

Why Spike Protein May Cause Serious Neurodegenerative Disease
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CKD), the human version of mad cow disease, is a prion disease. Other human forms of prion disease include Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS). “You have all these horrible neurodegenerative diseases and each one is tied to specific prion proteins,” Seneff says. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein also appears to be a prion protein, although this has yet to be thoroughly verified.

Disturbingly, the spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccines, due to the modifications made, may make it more of a prion than the spike protein in the actual virus, and a more effective one.

“Papers are showing that those germinal centers in the spleen … are a primary source of the prion proteins that eventually get taken up the vagus nerve and delivered to the brainstem nuclei. That's how you can get Parkinson's disease, for example …

There's so much we need to learn, but it looks to me like it's a setup here. They're really inviting this kind of thing to happen with these vaccines, where they're focusing on those germinal centers those are the very same place where these prion proteins often get started.”

[B]Why Long-Term Neurological Damage Is To Be Expected
In her paper, Seneff describes key characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests it’s a prion:11

“Neurological symptoms associated with COVID-19, such as headache, nausea and dizziness, encephalitis and fatal brain blood clots are all indicators of damaging viral effects on the brain. Buzhdygan et al. (2020) proposed that primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells could cause these symptoms ...

In an in vitro study of the blood-brain barrier, the S1 component of the spike protein promoted loss of barrier integrity, suggesting that the spike protein acting alone triggers a pro-inflammatory response in brain endothelial cells, which could explain the neurological consequences of the disease.

The implications of this observation are disturbing because the mRNA vaccines induce synthesis of the spike protein, which could theoretically act in a similar way to harm the brain. The spike protein generated endogenously by the vaccine could also negatively impact the male testes, as the ACE2 receptor is highly expressed in Leydig cells in the testes ...

Prion diseases are a collection of neurodegenerative diseases that are induced through the misfolding of important bodily proteins, which form toxic oligomers that eventually precipitate out as fibrils causing widespread damage to neurons …

Furthermore, researchers have identified a signature motif linked to susceptibility to misfolding into toxic oligomers, called the glycine zipper motif … Prion proteins become toxic when the α-helices misfold as β-sheets, and the protein is then impaired in its ability to enter the membrane.

Glycines within the glycine zipper transmembrane motifs in the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) play a central role in the misfolding of amyloid-β linked to Alzheimer’s disease. APP contains a total of four GxxxG motifs. When considering that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is a transmembrane protein, and that it contains five GxxxG motifs in its sequence,12 it becomes extremely plausible that it could behave as a prion.

One of the GxxxG sequences is present within its membrane fusion domain. Recall that the mRNA vaccines are designed with an altered sequence that replaces two adjacent amino acids in the fusion domain with a pair of prolines.

This is done intentionally in order to force the protein to remain in its open state and make it harder for it to fuse with the membrane. This seems to us like a dangerous step towards misfolding potentially leading to prion disease …

A paper published by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to many known proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions.

Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike protein’s S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic aggregates … and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”

So, in summary, the take-home here is that COVID-19 vaccines, offered to hundreds of millions of people, are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, leading to neurodegenerative diseases.

Vaccine Remedy May Be Worse Than the Disease
In her paper, Seneff goes into far more detail in her description of the spike protein as a metabolic poison. While I recommend reading Seneff’s paper in its entirety, I’ve extracted key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to lung damage and heart and brain diseases:13

“The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature … In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.

The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.

Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.

An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.

They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.

This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern."

Commercial Vaccines Are Not as ‘Clean’ as Trial Vaccines
Seneff’s paper also highlights the unknown hazard of injecting fragmented RNA, found in greater quantity in the commercially manufactured Pfizer vaccine compared to the vaccine used in the initial trials:14

“The EMA Public Assessment Report … describes in detail a review of the [Pfizer] manufacturing process … One concerning revelation is the presence of ‘fragmented species’ of RNA in the injection solution. These are RNA fragments resulting from early termination of the process of transcription from the DNA template.

These fragments, if translated by the cell following injection, would generate incomplete spike proteins, again resulting in altered and unpredictable three-dimensional structure and a physiological impact that is at best neutral and at worst detrimental to cellular functioning.

There were considerably more of these fragmented forms of RNA found in the commercially manufactured products than in the products used in clinical trials. The latter were produced via a much more tightly controlled manufacturing process ...

While we are not asserting that non-spike proteins generated from fragmented RNA would be misfolded or otherwise pathological, we believe they would at least contribute to the cellular stress that promotes prion-associated conformational changes in the spike protein that is present.”

More Information
Seneff and I cover a great deal more than I’ve covered in this article, including how the vaccines may trigger autoimmune problems by way of molecular mimicry. This includes things like celiac disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis and lupus. So, if you have ANY interest in learning more about this vaccine I strongly suggest you watch the entire video.

We also discuss how the shots are causing idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a rare blood disorder in which you end up with blood clots, a drop in platelet count and hemorrhages, all at the same time.

Also, be sure to read through Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.15

How Can You Protect Yourself From the Vaccine or Exposure to Those That Were Vaccinated?
Indeed, that is the question of the day. We talked about shedding from the vaccine. Obviously, the vaccine does not classically shed virus particles but it can easily cause people to shed spike proteins, and it is these spike proteins that may cause just as much damage as the virus.

While Seneff’s paper didn’t delve deeply into solutions, it provides a major clue, which is that your body has the capacity to address many of these problems through a process called autophagy. This is the process of removal of damaged proteins in your body.

One effective strategy that will upregulate autophagy is periodic fasting or time-restricted eating. Most people eat more than 12 hours a day. Gradually lowering that to a six- to eight-hour window will radically improve your metabolic flexibility and decrease insulin resistance.

Another beneficial practice is sauna therapy, which upregulates heat shock proteins. I have discussed this extensively in previous articles. Heat shock proteins work by refolding proteins that are misfolded. They also tag damaged proteins and target them for removal.

Another vital strategy is to eliminate all processed vegetable oils (seed oils), which means eliminating virtually all processed foods as they are loaded with them. Seed oils will radically impair mitochondrial energy production, increase oxidative stress and damage your immune system.

Seed oils also are likely to contain glyphosate, as it is heavily used on the crops that produce them. Obviously, it is important to avoid glyphosate contamination in all your food, which you can minimize by buying only certified organic foods.

Finally, you want to optimize your innate immune system and one of the best ways to do that is to get enough sun exposure, wearing in your bathing suit, to have your vitamin level reach 60 to 80 ng/ml (100 to 150 nmol/l).

+ Sources and References
1, 11, 13, 14, 15 International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444
2 America's Frontline Doctors May 9, 2021
3 Covid19.healthdata.org
4 The UNZ Review May 15, 2021
5 JAMA. March 15, 2021 doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4385
6 European Heart Journal July 20, 2020: ehaa534
7, 9 Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326
8 European Journal of Internal Medicine June 2020; 76:14-20
10 Molecular Reproduction and Development 2006; 73(10):1239-1246
12 UniProtKB P0DTC2 (Spike SARS2)

vevftt

Eva2

7th June 2021, 18:53

I didn't see this posted earlier so hope its not a repeat - from May 18
'The swab used to test for Covid is not only Made in China, but its saturated with Ethylene Oxide (EO), which is a carcinogen, damages DNA and fertility.'
An RN from The Purple Lion Project

'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dswaElkiRO8

Tintin

10th June 2021, 15:58

More evidence for immune system effectiveness in combating the virus.

SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of
disease severity
Stine SF Nielsen et al

Source: The Lancet (https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2352-3964%2821%2900203-6)

Findings: We report broad serological profiles within the cohort, detecting antibody binding to other human coronaviruses. 202(>99%) participants had SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, with SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and spike-ACE2 receptor interaction blocking observed in 193(95%) individuals. A significant positive correlation (r=0.7804) between spike-ACE2 blocking antibody titers and neutralization potency was observed. Further, SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8+ T-cell responses were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106(90%) HLA-A2+ individuals.

Delight

10th June 2021, 18:10

The Trueman Show #29 Dr Reiner Fuellmich
Jun 10, 2021

German/American lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. Reiner has done very big business against corrupt big corporations like Deutsche Bank, Volkswagen and Kuehne Nagel. Since March of last year, he and his international colleagues have also been doing many international lawsuits against governments for taking unnecessary and harmful 'measures'. I talked to him about what he's working on right now, about the theory that the 'virus' comes from a lab, who's behind this plan, what the plan really entails, how they put the 'virus' in the so-called 'vaccines', what the future holds, what we can do ourselves, are upcoming lawsuits and much more.

sJXCG3tXwj4

Gwin Ru

11th June 2021, 13:11

...

... getting closer to the truth of a matter in order to forward a lie: "The vaxx did it!"

NHS Told to Identify Patients Actually Sick From Covid-19 Rather Than Those Testing Positive (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-hospitals-nhs-england-data-b1862804.html)

UK Independent (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-hospitals-nhs-england-data-b1862804.html)
Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:52 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s30/611349/large/hospital.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s30/611349/full/hospital.jpg)

SOTT Comment: (https://www.sott.net/article/454002-NHS-Told-to-Identify-Patients-Actually-Sick-From-Covid-19-Rather-Than-Those-Testing-Positive) In an outrageous development that has not produced the appropriate condemnation and questioning, changes to the way UK hospitals collect data will correct the way covid cases and deaths have been reported. Unlike the last 14 months where anyone who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, or died with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, were deemed to be "positive cases" or have died "from covid", regardless of whether or not that was the actual cause of death, the new method will clinically define covid cases and deaths. This will create the necessary appearance that the vaccines are working and make the impact of the virus on the NHS "look better".
Hospitals have been told to change the way they collect data on patients infected with coronavirus to differentiate between those actually sick with symptoms and those who test positive while seeking treatment for something else.

[...]

Full article: https://www.sott.net/article/454002-NHS-Told-to-Identify-Patients-Actually-Sick-From-Covid-19-Rather-Than-Those-Testing-Positive

Tintin

24th June 2021, 11:45

Source: UK Column (https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/pcr-testing-and-the-genome-beast)

https://seed126.bitchute.com/n1rmW03lI0Eg/cNonvOQ6rwuX.mp4

Most people believe that the PCR test is a simple test to take samples to establish whether COVID-19 is present in an individual. Some people, perhaps better informed, may know that the PCR test does not have a good reputation for accuracy in results and may give false readings. Despite this significant weakness in efficacy and accuracy, the PCR test has been promoted with almost religious zeal to the wider population by the UK Government. "Everyone should be regularly PCR tested" is the constant government line.

But is the drive for COVID-19 testing just a smokescreen with regard to the PCR test? The answer to this simple question is a straightforward yes, it is. In reality, the PCR tests have another much more important role, and that is sampling DNA data to facilitate genome sequencing, the name for reading the genetic code for the makeup of the human body.

Before COVID, the DNA sampling industry was limited to working on the medical samples to which it could gain access, together with voluntary DNA samples which an individual might offer if they passed a sample to a genealogy site to determine their family history, for example.

COVID-19 PCR tests, undertaken by millions of people, have changed this dearth of DNA data to a flood of data. And that data is worth money — a lot of money, as we shall see.

In this latest edition of No Smoke Without Fire, entitled PCR Testing and the Genome Beast, Brian Gerrish discusses with Debi Evans her research into the whole subject of genome sequencing and where it leads.

Hidden in plain sight, the genome sequencing industry is a beast of huge scale. Globally, the industry is already worth trillions of pounds, and it is expected to grow rapidly from this already immense financial base. The top ten genome sequencing companies alone had a value of over £635,000,000,000 in 2020.

Debi's interest in the PCR test began when she discovered that Illumina was the company responsible for COVID-19 PCR testing. Yet it was quickly clear that Illumina was a lot more than it might appear. As Illumina says of itself:

"At Illumina, our goal is to apply innovative technologies to the analysis of genetic variation and function, making studies possible that were not even imaginable just a few years ago. It is mission critical for us to deliver innovative, flexible, and scalable solutions to meet the needs of our customers. As a global company that places high value on collaborative interactions, rapid delivery of solutions, and providing the highest level of quality, we strive to meet this challenge. Illumina innovative sequencing and array technologies are fueling groundbreaking advancements in life science research, translational and consumer genomics, and molecular diagnostics."

- illumina.com

But Illumina turned out to be just one company of many. The trail led to a very large and murky pond of genome sequencing and related companies, such as Grail, the Wellcome Sanger Institute, UK Biobank, TwinsUK, Amgen, the Mayo Clinic and Genomics England — all of which overlaps with gene editing technology such as CRISPR. Governments and military also come into the picture, with ARIA and ARPA in the UK and DARPA in the USA. British academia is also well entrenched in the system, with Oxford University and Imperial College London being just two of the many institutions at the forefront.

In the mix, the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) appeared strangely silent on the subject of vaccine data. After all, it collected Yellow Card vaccine adverse reaction (ADR) data, but published no details of any safety analysis of the very data it had collected. So where does that vaccine ADR data go?

Similarly with the National Health Service (NHS): a prime collector of DNA data, but producing little public explanation as to where that data has been going and why.

Our discussion also moves on to the people involved in the Genome Sequencing trail. Professor Sally Davies stated in her Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016 that:

"Genomics is not tomorrow. It is here today. I believe genomic services should be available to more patients, whilst being a cost-effective service in the NHS. This is an exciting science with the potential for fantastic improvements in prevention, health protection and patient outcomes. Now we need to welcome the genomic era and deliver the genomic dream!"

- Sally C. Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England, 2016

But if Dame Sally's professional enthusiasm is understandable, just why is former Prime Ministerial chief adviser Dominic Cummings almost high on the subject of genomes? In his personal blog, his language, thoughts, and, we may say, fantasies are both breathtaking and very dark. He clearly speaks of the idea that people can and will be changed, re-engineered and 'improved'. By implication, we can discern that there is no room in Cummings' world for the weak and vulnerable. And if people can be integrated with computers and AI, then so much the better.

If Cummings is at least constricted in his efforts within the scope of the British government, we get a better feel for the worldwide power of the Genome Sequencing medico-military industry by reading the World Economic Forum's white paper of June 2020 entitled Genomic Data Policy Framework and Ethical Tensions, and the World Health Organisation's Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research 2002.

Ultimately, our research touches on even wider plans for the 'benefits' of genome sequencing and editing: Behavioural Insights, where people can be re-engineered to have the right thoughts, emotions and behaviours, including their being suitably politically aligned in these areas.

It is against this background that we should consider the words of Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister, who has stated that the UK can become a "scientific superpower" leading the world in these areas.

Would you like to know more? Then please do join us for our initial overview of PCR Testing and the Genome Beast.

Gwin Ru

28th June 2021, 21:43

...

... Delta Variant COVID Scam Exposed (https://rumble.com/vj68t3-delta-variant-covid-scam-exposed.html) 2:19

HealthImpactNews (https://rumble.com/user/HealthImpactNews) Published June 28, 2021 108 Views

vgk2nt

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — Originally posted on Twitter by Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor
https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1408054265784930311

Dr. Michael Yeadon on Why Variants of COVID-19 are Harmless (https://rumble.com/vj6apn-dr.-michael-yeadon-on-why-variants-of-covid-19-are-harmless.html) 3:48

HealthImpactNews (https://rumble.com/user/HealthImpactNews) Published June 28, 2021 52 Views

vgk4kd

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — Former Vice President of Pfizer Dr. Michael Yeadon shines the light of the truth on the COVID-19 variant scam.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/the-delta-variant-of-covid-19-is-harmless-a-scam-for-governments-to-implement-more-lockdowns/

Matthew

29th June 2021, 00:40

Month old news, probably posted elsewhere. But it is good :inlove:

https://greatgameindia.com/lisbon-court-death-covid-cases/

Lisbon Court Rules Only 0.9% Of ‘Verified Cases’ Died Of COVID, Numbering 152, Not 17,000 As Claimed June 28, 2021

As per a ruling by the Lisbon court, only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, and not 17,000 as claimed by the government. The ruling has proved that the government faked COVID-19 death statistics.

Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data.

According to the ruling (read full judgment below), the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.

All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.

The data are from the Sistema de Informação dos Certificados de Óbito (Death Certificate Information System – SICO), the only such system in Portugal.

...

Tintin

2nd July 2021, 14:11

Nicely timed post Matthew.

Here's a very revealing FOI request response from a UK NHS Foundation Trust, which, bearing in mind that health trust has over or around 200 hospitals and clinics under its remit throws the 'official' figures into a stark light. It's also reminded me that I am going to do similarly with a sample of local trusts in my area, and see what they get back with, using the same date range here for comparison:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/744125/response/1774876/attach/4/FOI%20060421%20Response.pdf

onawah

6th July 2021, 01:08

DR DAVID MARTIN – THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE
July 3, 2021
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-david-martin-the-illusion-of-knowledge/

"Dr David E Martin begins by saying, “I think every conversation about COVID and every conversation about SARS-Coronavirus is the wrong conversation for humanity to be having. And I think that we have been seduced into a distraction of epic proportions while a greater evil is being done.

“So I am not gonna fall for it! If you thought this was gonna be the ‘Find the Fauci’ moment, I’ve got a little teaser in there, you’ll get a little Fauci but that’s not what this is about. This is about the illusion of knowledge.

“And I have at the bottom of this slide, one of my favorite quotes from Hosea 4:6, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”

***

In our quest to figure out how this genocidal global CoronaHoax was pulled off, we’ve looked at the Globalists, the central bankers, the corporatists, the pedophiles, the Communists, the British Crown, the Tavistock Institute, the CCP, the Illuminati, the Jesuits, Bill Gates, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Sabbateans, the Bilderbergers, Klaus Schwab, the Satanists, the Freemasons – and even the Mantids from Hyperspace – but today, we can add another culprit, who the brilliant Dr Dave E Martin informs us, “For the last 145 years, they have done a wonderful job of making sure you never knew they’re behind it all. And by ‘all’, I mean ALL. And I don’t mean ‘some of all.’ I mean ‘All of All.'”

And who might that be?

The life insurance industry.

Yes. We haven’t heard a peep from anyone about the insurance companies throughout our dystopian COVID interlude – let alone, ever – but Dr Martin assures us that it was the insurance companies who actually set up the central bankers to be the “Fall Guy” (!)

Dr Martin says, “It turns out, the thing that makes life insurance work is a thing called ‘Term Life Policies’…and what you do is you pay your life insurance premiums and you do that for a long time and after a while, you kind of go, ‘I’m paying a lot in and I’m not sure what I’m getting for the return and it turns out that, for most of us, after 17 and a half to 18 and a half years, we stop paying.

“That’s a great business, isn’t it? To tax people for 18 years, to offer them nothing and in return for the favor, keep all their money, plus all the money you made on their money and offer them no benefit. Pretty goo racket! Best part about it is they actually figured out that it was important to support the Eugenics Movement.

“You heard what I said, People! Turns out that the thing that throws a curve ball into life insurance policies is people that die when you don’t want them to die. That’s a curve ball. That means you have to pay out.

“So, surprisingly, in 1904 to 1910, Andrew Carnegie, who was very much affiliated with several of the boards of the life insurance companies decided that we needed to institutionalize medicine…institutionalize health research and pay for it for life insurance companies. Because controlling your death was big business. And people who didn’t match the actuarial models were bad for business.

“Lo and behold! What did we start doing? I love it when people tell me that eugenics was a ‘Hitler thing’! Hahaha! Nice try! And thank you, once again to the life insurance companies for marketing that piece of bullsh*t – but this particular pursuit of this particular situation was born in 1910.

“Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory…Isn’t it funny how we’ve been sucker-punched into believing that the Bad Guy is a Rothschild or the Bad Guy is a part of this nefarious, Deep Underlord, Dark Underworld, Pentagram-laden, candle ceremony, séance bullsh*t story? Isn’t it great to have a cover story, when nobody then asks the right question, which is, ‘Hold on a minute, if somebody’s marketing a story to me, I wonder if that marketing of a story is so I don’t ask any more questions?

“And by the way, anybody who thinks that the world is run by the Rothschilds has their head up their ass. And I’m dead serious. The world is actually run by life insurance executives.

“Bad news! And it turns out we’re going to get to why that’s so damned important…

“What happened in 1914 is an unforgivable mortal sin…It turns out that World War I was good business for life insurers. You know what happened when we sent…young men to their deaths in Europe? Life insurers pocketed a sh*tload of money. Because it turns out that few people knew how to file claims. The Department of Defense didn’t have a mechanism to actually process those things and it turns out that, in fact, the First World War, if you look at it from an economic perspective, the biggest winner of the First World War were life insurance companies.”

***

Dr David E Martin is so incredible and I got so much positive feedback from yesterday’s Q&A session at a screening of Plandemic and so many reader requests to see the main event that I found it (or at least part of it) and it is even more incredible than the Q&A. Watching this video is like having paid $60,000 tuition to attend the highest-level university – a hypothetical university that is actually worth that.

He shares, “One of the experiences I had in my life was to be invited into the very heart of the organization that is running this very destruction. And in 1998, you can read about it in my novel, Coup d’Twelve…I was actually invited to take a very senior role in destroying this planet. And like everything else, the deal was a good deal…but at what price your soul?…

He says that Cabal agents tried bribing him with women, money – you name it – and that if he hadn’t been raised as a Mennonite, these might have worked.

“This particular campaign began in 1804. Edward Jenner who is the person who gave us the opportunity to call a thing a ‘vaccine’…decided there was actually an opportunity and a risk to play around with the weaponization of nature. And in 1803, he decided to coin a conversation that lasted for 80 years, which was ‘How can we use the plague constructively?’…

“And in 1883, Francis Galton came up with the answer to the question – and the answer to the question was these beautiful things called bacterium, viruses, plague could be very interestingly described into a term he decided to publish in 1883 as ‘Eugenics’ and ‘Wouldn’t it be interesting if we could actually harness nature to actually be weaponized against humanity?’

“If we were to examine the business plan that gave rise to what we’re experiencing now – and by the way, that business plan included an industry that mysteriously, for the last 15 months, none of us have heard anybody talking about – except a bald-headed, bowtie-wearing idiot from Virginia, you didn’t hear about life insurance!

“Oooh. Now we’re gonna get real. Because, it turns out that between 1883 and 1893, the largest growth contributor to the GDP of this country was the trade in the fear of death. The life insurance industry represented more than the combined contribution to the economy of the coal, steel and manufacturing – COMBINED. In the ten years from 1883 and 1893.

“And the reason why none of your are talking about this is because, if you want to know who runs the world, you’ve got it all wrong, ever since you were fooled into believing that the Federal Reserve was a central bank money-grab by bankers and by the Cabal in 1913, because it turns out, conveniently, insurance companies – not banks – put up banks to be the Fall Guy.

“In 1904, all you have to do is look at who was on the dais when the President was sworn into to office, the following year, 1905. And you see, quite mysteriously, standing next to the President of the United States were the executives of New York Life, of Aetna and of the major life insurance companies of America.”

I can’t transcribe it all – and I don’t think you want to read the entire transcript, either but he gets into so many vital riffs, he is a thing of wonder. Here’s one last point I can’t resist sharing:

“Isn’t interesting, that we’re marching for Civil Rights when we’re murdering people? Isn’t that a really cool paradox, where our official cover story is all about ‘equal access’ and ‘let’s let everybody to the drinking fountain’, to ‘let’s have less people to the drinking fountain,’ to the point where we could maybe get nobody to the drinking fountain…

“Now here’s, in my view, the long arc of the insurance companies’ story, the Original Sin. And I am going to offend almost everybody in the room with what I’m going to say about science…It turns out, you don’t have DNA. You have chromosomes. Nature made chromosomes…DNA is not a product of nature. It is a model of human manipulation. Listen carefully to what I’m saying: DNA is not a product of nature, it is a characteristic, it is a model of human manipulation…

“Why do you think the Nobel Prize was awarded to the people who didn’t even discover the thing (DNA)? They didn’t! Watson and Crick had nothing to do – seriously – nothing to do with discovering anything. They happened to be eugenicists who would support a cover story that would tell science, ‘Don’t look anywhere else, only look to the double helix.

“Going to go out on a limb here, for ya. Chromosomes, being paramagnetic, wound, helical coils of conductive material are quite possibly antennae. They’re quite possibly not chemistry, at all. And it turns out, I’ve proven that in the lab.

“If you wonder why the magnet experiment, that you’re going to hear about from Dr Carrie [?] is so damned interesting. It’s not because of DNA. It’s not because of RNA. It’s because they are putting an antenna into your body to screw up the transmissions of all of the wisdom of the Cosmos, so that you are detached from being human.” "

vflco3

Constance

6th July 2021, 08:13

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Tintin

8th July 2021, 13:03

"The manner in which society has accepted this kind of gobbledegook from politicians, SAGE, SPI-B, public health directors and epidemiologists is frightening." - John A. Fairclough

----------

Covid and the Death of the Scientific Method
4 July 2021 / Updated 7 July 2021
by John A Fairclough B.M. B.S. B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM

Source: Lockdown Sceptics (https://lockdownsceptics.org/covid-and-the-death-of-the-scientific-method/)

https://lockdownsceptics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/f1.jpg

While Matt Hancock was running around in nursery, I managed a polio epidemic, had malaria, treated leprosy and Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease in cannibals (Mad Cow) – also abandoned my pregnant wife for safety in a convent in Papua New Guinea to rescue a voluntary worker, had a career in medicine of over five decades, published widely, including on infection ritual, the wearing of masks, and once appeared in the Times Top 10 surgeons.

I was married to a Welsh geography teacher who survived eclampsia, cerebral oedema in ITU and fractured jaw, breast cancer and ectopic pregnancy.

I lectured Internationally on the Myth of Surgical Ritual (including the nonsense of cloth masks). The above photo is a slide from the lecture.

We are now the grannies and grandads whom Matt Hancock patronised by asking the younger generation to save. We can’t apparently assess our own risk.

The absence of scientists in the political masters and some media correspondents has rendered them incapable of interrogating the validity of data suggested by some scientists. It may be a surprise to many that epidemiologists are mainly mathematicians not medics and that most scientists on SAGE are not practising clinicians who wear masks as surgeons do as part of their practice.

We now have a new Health Secretary but still the lamentable voices of SAGE, the BMA and a host of individuals who appear incapable of distinguishing scientific data from opinion.

The latest entreaty from the BMA made by Chaand Nagpaul, a GP who is registered at the aptly named “Honeypot Medical Centre Surgery” apparently supported by Chris Whitty, is that “face masks may be needed after July 19th amid fears over ‘alarming’ rise in Covid cases”.

I have fought over the five decades of my career to ensure that treatment is based not only on the science but on the relevance to the individual. Hence as a clinician I discuss management and we discuss risks including doing nothing. It is mandated that we indicate the scientific basis on which our decisions are made. When we now observe masks being given a magical property and the vaccination of children as part of the programme, we are hurtling headlong into a completely new moral and ethical paradigm. We do not know what happens to an individual who has had a COVID-19 vaccine in the long term. We do, however, know the generalised risk of mortality and the essential safety of COVID-19 in the younger generation but yet are demanding vaccination in the young. Any demand to vaccinate the under 16s is fraught with a legal challenge as the ‘best interest’ test will not be passed; sadly there is an absence of practising clinicians being listened to.

Covid has now been inculcated into the very essence of life such that society now believes that to question non-adherence to manufactured ‘rules’ or question their relevance is akin to blasphemy.

Today we attended an open-air restaurant. If we sat and had a coffee, we did not need masks, but as we walk between the tables we would all suddenly have to put masks on. (I sat next to a man on chemotherapy for terminal prostate cancer at lunch.)

The manner in which society has accepted this kind of gobbledegook from politicians, SAGE, SPI-B, public health directors and epidemiologists is frightening. It is perhaps because journalists do not understand science. Science is not pure or constant and medicine is littered with failed good ideas from aspirin in children, to gynaecological mesh, thalidomide, etc. Furthermore, academics and departments are developed from funding related to publications they produce.

When Neil Ferguson et al. in 2002 generated their fear of mad cow disease (I had already seen it in the cannibals in Papua New Guinea), they essentially panicked society in the U.K. and required a mass slaughter of cattle to treat an unknown risk which they overestimated (parallels with Covid?). What is not generally known is the immense knock-on costs this caused, e.g. in orthopaedic surgery where we were told to use disposable instruments with new protocols adding time and expense. The newspapers, TV and radio were filled with gloomy prediction of Armageddon in years to come and panic raged. When a vegetarian developed CJD there was not a sensible scientific view that this occurrence should question the assumption that CJD was related to eating meat. Scientific gymnastics were employed, not to explain that perhaps the cause (a prion) was elsewhere in the environment but that his mother had worked in an abattoir, which was ludicrous. Why? Because vast sums were given to departments to support jobs and projects and if it had been shown that the disease was not an existential threat, then research would be less important. Recognise the similarity now with the supporters of continuation of the Covid regulations? Once it is over, all the media hungry scientists, public health doctors, etc. will return to their previous anonymity and struggle to get funds unless they can continue with the fear, i.e., they are motivated to continue.

The ability to dissent from the consensus view of society is equated with either a charge of ignorance or selfishness and with becoming a social pariah.

The dystopian nature of how society has become was demonstrated in a poll by IPSOS.

The questions do not ask about knowledge of dangers, etc.

If you provide the public with essentially one-sided data, you will get the response you choose. It is horrific that the Government would feel emboldened by a public poll to start vaccinating children.

The question the poll did not ask is: If there is any possibility however remote that your child will die or be seriously ill after vaccination, would you support its use?

When Tim Spector tweeted that children may need to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity, we have little hope, because there is no discussion of potential harm vs. benefit for them and it is another voice in the gobbledegook science that is so prevalent today.

Perhaps the biggest casualty of the pandemic has been the death of the scientific method. The acquisition of knowledge that has characterised the development of science requires applying rigorous scepticism about what is observed, as preformed opinion or assumptions can distort how one interprets the data. The process involves making hypotheses and testing these by conducting experiments or studies. In human disease experiments, unless you have a controlled experimental population exposed to a measurable intervention which can be compared with a matched experimental group who have no intervention, then data is always subject to marked error.

The papers published on the virus have encompassed the very best of science with the development of understanding of the genomic sequence of SARS COV-2 and vaccine development, but have also been redolent with observational studies most of which in normal time would never be published.

The silly ‘rules’ of mask wearing and social distancing have now been brought to a new sense of ridicule with the inability to sing in church or at a wedding, while we are ‘permitted’ to go to large alcohol-fuelled football matches.

The present Government has made society believe that it is more important not to die than to have the ability to live. Sadly, we will all die, but they have shown that they can stop us living.

I, along with my wife, will no longer wear a mask. Not because we are intending to be criminals but because the masking policy is based on the distorted paranoid views of a few media voices.

John A. Fairclough is Hon. Consultant Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon University Hospital of Wales and Professor Emeritus at Cardiff Metropolitan University

Pam

8th July 2021, 14:47

I am not sure how to intro this information but I feel it may be very important. This forum is actually about capitol markets and analysis for investing. There is a person that follows employment stats in the US and has inadvertently come across some very interesting information involving considerable reduction in numbers. It looks sort of dry at first glance but it is well worth the consideration. What do you statisticians think of this?

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242844

I don't know if this can be imbedded.

Matthew

8th July 2021, 20:30

Death Certificate Clerk confirms deaths were wrongly labelled as Covid-19 to boost numbers
BY THE DAILY EXPOSE ON JULY 7, 2021
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/07/death-certificate-clerk-confirms-deaths-were-wrongly-labelled-as-covid-19-to-boost-numbers/

Although revered as the guiding star for science, clinical practice and legislation aimed to save lives, cause-of-death reporting does not meet any basic criteria of objective fact. Across continents, from 40 years ago to present day, death certificates, which provide the basis for our beliefs as to why we die, have been found to be erroneous in their causal conclusions 20-60% of the time according to the peer-reviewed literature.

The daily process of obtaining cause-of-death information, which I was an eyewitness to, is not a process of careful investigation, but rather a rushed and apathetic bureaucratic tumbling machine that incentivizes compliance over recording the complexity of truth.

By Joy Fritz – a former Death Certificate Clerk who worked at two separate mortuary firms for over 6 years

In this piece I offer a personal account, a logical argument and the scientific evidence for the claim that mortality statistics derived from cause-of-death reporting on death certificates are an unstable material upon which to build actionable scientific or societal beliefs about risk. Then I provide an in-depth examination of the very particular situation of COVID death reporting manipulation that happened beginning in March of 2020, infused politicized bias into an already defunct system.

Lastly, you will find a call to action, with steps that we, the individuals affected by the inaccurate data capture, can take to hold the regulatory bodies responsible for this to account, as well as volunteer and support opportunities to help those who need to get erroneous death certificates officially amended.

Being a former death certificate clerk, and having spent nearly 7 years in the funeral home industry ushering thousands of death certificates from digital creation to final registration, I am appalled that death certificate data is codified for use as our national mortality statistics.

...

Gwin Ru

19th July 2021, 20:12

...

... if this is true: 45,000 death within 3 days after inoculation... pitchfork manufactures should see their profits skyrocket!

1417174146337943553

Bill Ryan

19th July 2021, 20:21

Bill Ryan

19th July 2021, 21:45

... if this is true: 45,000 death within 3 days after inoculation... pitchfork manufactures should see their profits skyrocket!
I'd suspect it's more likely that whatever stats were the source (do we know what they are??), they've just suddenly jumped because they were all compiled or updated at once.

It's a horrific number, whether over a 3 day period or a 3 month period, but I really do think it's more likely to be the latter.Ah.... now I understand. Bear of very little brain here, so please forgive me. :bearhug:

It's not that 45,000 people all died in a 3 day period. 45,000 people each, at different times, died within 3 days of getting their shot. It was this article that clarified that for me.

https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/attorney-files-lawsuit-against-cdc-based-on-sworn-declaration-from-whistleblower-claiming-45000-deaths-are-reported-to-vaers-all-within-3-days-of-covid-19-shots

Attorney Files Lawsuit Against CDC Based on “Sworn Declaration” from Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths are Reported to VAERS – All Within 3 Days of COVID-19 Shots

pyrangello

19th July 2021, 22:19

Go to the 40 minute mark of this video, watch for 11 miniutes, stats are given , this was before this suit, Remember this VAERS data reporting is 3 months behind.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WXEeUj6PJ9tN/

Satori

19th July 2021, 22:26

In the US of A the illegitimate Secretary of the Department Health (sic) of Human and Services (sic) just renewed the so-called public health emergency in connection with SARS Covid-2. No surprise there.

https://www.phe.gov/emergency/news/healthactions/phe/Pages/COVID-19July2021.aspx

Now the criminal governors of the totalitarian states that want to extend the anti-constitutional and criminal restrictions on our liberties have a green light to do so. New Mexico is one of those states.

heretogrow

20th July 2021, 00:43

I shared too much and deleted because it made me feel uncomfortable. Sorry!

Tintin

20th July 2021, 13:19

Gwin Ru

21st July 2021, 13:02

America’s Frontline Doctors File Federal Lawsuit to Curtail Emergency Use of Covid Vaccines (https://www.unz.com/proberts/americas-frontline-doctors-file-federal-lawsuit-to-curtail-emergency-use-of-covid-vaccines/)

Paul Craig Roberts (https://www.unz.com/author/paul-craig-roberts/)
July 20, 2021

Update:
Lisbon Court Rules Only 0.9% of ‘Verified Cases’ Died of COVID, Numbering 152, Not 17,000 Claimed
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/21/facts-that-the-presstitutes-hide-from-you/
Related Development:
A federal district court has ordered NIH to release the Moderna safety data from Moderna’s Covid vaccine trials that Tony Fauci has been hiding.

We will see if the corrupt American establishment will have a higher court overturn the ruling.
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/federal-court-rules-in-icans-favor-and-orders-covid-19-safety-data-to-be-disclosed/

________________________

It appears that my reading of the Covid information is correct. The official reported cases and deaths are a scam, and the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus.

America’s Frontline Doctors have filed a federal lawsuit to stop the emergency use of untested and unapproved vaccines on three groups of people.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/americas-frontline-doctors-federal-lawsuit-halt-covid-vaccines-cdc-vaccine-deaths/

We will see if Big Pharma owns the courts too.

[...]

Why the secrecy around V-Safe data? The complaint called attention to the secrecy of the CDC’s V-Safe system — a parallel system used to track reported adverse events via a smartphone app controlled exclusively by the CDC.

Plaintiffs raised concerns that information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it potentially includes fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government is failing to provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS and the military.

Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they can’t help but wonder why HHS would fail to disclose to the public critical information related to risk from it’s reporting systems, “particularly in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to study and extend the authorizations on the vaccines, build an enormous vaccine marketing machine and roll out vaccine clinics all over the nation.”

The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Law. The complaint and whistleblower declaration can be read here:https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org (https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/20/americas-frontline-doctors-file-federal-lawsuit-to-curtail-emergency-use-of-covid-vaccines/) by permission of author or representative)

Gwin Ru

21st July 2021, 14:08

U.S. Federal Lawsuit Filed Based on CDC Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths After COVID Shots (https://rumble.com/vk28y9-u.s.-federal-lawsuit-filed-based-on-cdc-whistleblower-claiming-45000-deaths.html)

HealthImpactNews (https://rumble.com/user/HealthImpactNews)
Published July 19, 2021

vhg2sz

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — Ohio-based Attorney Thomas Renz was one of several speakers this past weekend at a conference in Anaheim, California, where he announced that with the help of America's Frontline Doctors, he was filing a federal lawsuit in Alabama based on a "sworn declaration, under threat of perjury," from an alleged whistleblower who claims to have inside knowledge of a cover-up of reported deaths filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is operated by the CDC.

This whistleblower has allegedly claimed, under oath, that there are at least 45,000 reported deaths that have occurred within 3 days of receiving a COVID-19 "vaccine." Renz states that this report of 45,000 deaths is just from "one system" that reports to VAERS.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/attorney-files-lawsuit-against-cdc-based-on-sworn-declaration-from-whistleblower-claiming-45000-deaths-are-reported-to-vaers-all-within-3-days-of-covid-19-shots/

Bill Ryan

21st July 2021, 16:36

Satori has asked me to post these here on his behalf. NM attorney Ana Garner (whom Satori knows personally and has referenced on other threads) sent these documents to him.

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Ex_11_Affid_Hallmark.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Ex_4_Declar_Jane_Doe.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Petition_for_PI.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Urso_Declaration.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Skelton_Declaration.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Response_to_citizens_petition.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Merritt_Declaration.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/McCullough_Declaration.pdf
https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/M_for_PI_file_stamped.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Ex_11_Affid_Hallmark.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Ex_4_Declar_Jane_Doe.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Petition_for_PI.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Urso_Declaration.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Skelton_Declaration.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Response_to_citizens_petition.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/Merritt_Declaration.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/McCullough_Declaration.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/Ana_Garner/M_for_PI_file_stamped.pdf

Satori

21st July 2021, 18:35

Thanks Bill.

By the way, CDC, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (sic), is reporting that VAERS received 12,313 reports of death from the jab through July 19, 2021.

In Jane Doe's declaration filed in the Alabama federal lawsuit, there were 9,048 deaths reported to VAERS as of July 9, 2021. Thus, in a period of 10 days an additional 3,265 people were reported to have died from the jab. That is 326.5 people per day, or 653 people every two days on average.

Going with the under reporting by a factor of 5, that is 16,325 deaths from the jab in 10 days between July 9, and July 19, 2021.

Even if the factor is less than 5, say 2, or even no under reporting is occurring at all (which is a ridiculous conclusion), there is, no matter how you slice it, a grossly outrageous number of people who have died trusting in the government and big pharma.

This is sickening.

Tintin

27th July 2021, 15:42

Bill Ryan

27th July 2021, 17:07

Satori

27th July 2021, 17:53

Thanks a million Bill!

pyrangello

27th July 2021, 18:24

141 people in this hospital and ICU , all but 1 person were vaccinated. ALL-------------------go to the 34 minute mark of the video https://www.bitchute.com/video/w2b4iBwIQncu/ AND WE KNOW..........................

Matthew

27th July 2021, 23:17

pyrangello

27th July 2021, 23:26

So were starting to see the pattern, country after country, village after village, looks like the house of cards will be showing its hand much earlier than expected , Israel, Iceland, Azores, and don't forget ALL the animals died during the testing of covid, some not initially , but the ones that made it thru the first hurdle eventually died too. Thats why the U.S. Govt just funded 27 million more in breeding monkey's for more jabs, CAUSE THERE ISNT ANY LEFT!

DaveToo

28th July 2021, 01:46

Does anyone happen to know anything about Iceland? I'm not talking about the shop, I'm talking about the real one, the one that's not made out of ice.

There are some startling statistics, but I've got some work to do before I can check them... and crudely at that, but right now I'm hoping someone has a better intuition for Icelandic medical politics. Might be scaremongering?

You inspired me to check out Iceland and my other charts to see what can be made of them currently.

Once again the caveat is, garbage in garbage out; namely we are working with the numbers given to us by the devil.
So everything should be taken with a grain of salt, especially the case numbers (based on PCR tests).

Looking for the time being just at the double-vaxxed numbers we see
the highest % vaxxed for the most part, with relatively small countries.
This is to be expected. It's easier to get 100% vaxxed in a country the size of
Gibraltar than it is for say the U.S.
Iceland belongs to the 'relatively small country' group and this could certainly explain at least partially why it's so heavily vaxxed.

First graph is Iceland cases, second is Iceland % double-vaxxed:
4704347044

Countries that currently stand out in the 60%+ list are U.A.E., Chile, Uruguay, Israel and Bahrain.
Can anyone chime in here who has done some research on this, to posit why these countries have gone gung-ho with the jabs?

47045

For the 50-60% double-vaxxed we can quickly dismiss the smaller countries again. Any ideas for why the rest are so enthusiastic about the jab?

Canada has gone on a tear the past few weeks from 5% to 56% in less than 2 months! I can attest to the absolute flooding of the media zone in trying to convince everyone to take the jab. That certainly has played a large role in the 'successful' campaign.

47046

For the 40-50% double-vaxxed we can see once again that for the most part, the E.U countries are marching lockstep with the jab, creeping up slowly towards 50%+.

47047

Continued...

DaveToo

28th July 2021, 01:52

Continued...

For the current 'hotspot' countries, case-wise, we see they are literally all over the map.
Some in their first wave, many in their fourth.

(double-click image to enlarge)
47049

What is clear as day to me after studying these maps for almost 1.5 years is that this plandemic' can be milked indefinitely.
Despite being heavily vaxxed Iceland, Israel, the U.S., France, Italy and Spain are part of the infamous 'hotspot' list.

'Variants of concern' will always be blamed for the never-ending plandemic along with those dreaded anti-vaxxers who are the super-spreaders.
And of course we mustn't forget the trustworthy tests that drives the whole thing.

And though Australia has only .13% cases per population (vs. 10.4% for the U.S) that hasn't stopped it from imposing some of the most draconian measures in the world to totally eradicate the virus from their country.

Tintin

29th July 2021, 12:25

PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT.

Ehden on Twitter found this recently published Pfizer contract that was released to an Albanian news agency.

The related thread on Twitter can be found here where he has broken this down in a series of neat summaries:

https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1419653002818990085

The pdf of the 56 page contract itself can be found here:
https://gogo.al/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/LEXO-KONTRATEN-E-PLOTE.pdf

Editing to include Gwin Ru's post from here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115576-Graphene-in-the-vaccines&p=1442992&viewfull=1#post1442992)

...

... the reasons why defiant heads of states died and why no amount of logic or rationality can even put a dent in the resolve of subservient governments to mandate "vaccines":

Pfizer has hit the goldmine during Covid Crisis, alleged leaked contract shows appalling terms and conditions (https://tfiglobalnews.com/2021/07/28/pfizer-has-hit-the-goldmine-during-covid-crisis-leaked-contract-shows-appalling-terms-and-conditions/)

Leaked confidential agreement allegedly between Pfizer and Albania reveals how Pfizer is ripping off countries

https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d50d5069ab3e61cfc82a8abbe5ba19a8?s=80&d=mm&r=g by Abhyoday Sisodia (https://tfiglobalnews.com/author/abhyodaysisodia/)
July 28, 2021 (https://tfiglobalnews.com/2021/07/28/pfizer-has-hit-the-goldmine-during-covid-crisis-leaked-contract-shows-appalling-terms-and-conditions/)
in Americas (https://tfiglobalnews.com/category/americas/)
Reading Time: 3 mins read

https://tfiglobalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/1-16-750x375.jpg (https://tfiglobalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/1-16.jpg)

If someone wants to look at how low these pharma companies can stoop to maximise their profits even when the whole of humanity is facing a global pandemic, look no further than Pfizer. While the company tried to hide its manufacturing and supply agreements behind confidentiality, the alleged agreement with the Albanian government has seemingly spilled the beans. It elaborates on the (https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1419683893469487109) crony capitalist, profit maximisation and neo-colonial approach of the pharma company. After this allegation, Pfizer has a lot to answer for.

Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of its international COVID19 vaccine agreements. However, the latest leak claimed by Twitter user Ehden, who is an information security and privacy professional based in the United Kingdom, has revealed startling details allegedly about the Pfizer vaccine agreement with the Albanian government. It is in some sort similar to the agreements Western powers would have made with their colonies, these are the modern formulation of unequal treaties.

1419653002818990085
1419682762974547970
The alleged leaked confidential agreement is with the government of Albania and it not only covers the manufacturing of vaccines for COVID19 and its mutations, but also for “any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine”. So here vaccine is used as an umbrella term for everything related to vaccines under the sun. The alleged agreement does not allow signatory countries to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided. This is the reason why many governments were not enthusiastic about employing Ivermectin, given it would have only added to the cost.

So this is one of the many examples in the (https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1419683893469487109) alleged agreement which raises suspicion about Pfizer being more concerned about maximising profit rather than using its resources for the betterment of the people. The alleged agreement goes on to say, while Pfizer shall not be liable to the failure to deliver doses in accordance with est delivery dates, it will have the power to decide on necessary adjustments to the number of contracted doses and delivery schedule due to the purchaser based on principles to be determined by Pfizer and the purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision, decided by Pfizer.

The alleged document stated that the purchaser acknowledges the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known. So even if the vaccine leads to some problems, the purchaser cannot sue the company, what a noble act!

It further states that the purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech (and) their affiliates from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses. So the purchaser state has been made responsible to save this big pharma company, against the complaints of its own citizens. Through the allegedly leaked confidential agreement, the Twitter user claims that Pfizer (https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1419683893469487109) shall also have the right to assume control of such defence and the purchaser shall pay all losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred.

To further raise questions about profit maximisation and hollow ethics of the company, the alleged agreement revealed that the vaccines were sold for $12 to Albania, while it was sold at the rate of $19 per shot in the US and Israel.

Related:

China “donated” vaccines to Vietnam but under one caveat: The vaccines are not for Vietnam (https://tfiglobalnews.com/2021/06/27/china-donated-vaccines-to-vietnam-but-under-one-caveat-the-vaccines-are-not-for-vietnam/)

Nations that accepted Chinese vaccines are bracing for a huge Covid disaster but Japan has come to their rescue (https://tfiglobalnews.com/2021/06/26/nations-that-accepted-chinese-vaccines-are-bracing-for-a-huge-covid-disaster-but-japan-has-come-to-their-rescue/)

gord

29th July 2021, 13:01

https://img.ifunny.co/images/3229304e26f6e335783ff4525773f8ef91555638c04f0c40b7223e325d34d6e2_1.jpg

mojo

29th July 2021, 18:04

The CDC push for new MASK MANDATES for vaccinated especially for school children is based on faulty research. Bongino's opening story

https://rumble.com/vkhpfb-ep.-1573-the-cdc-gets-caught-red-handed.html

vhvja1

Tintin

3rd August 2021, 12:29

My goodness.

The dark hand of the Establishment appears to have struck? Details are scarce on this story at the time of writing but the State has had 'previous' - it can't be ruled out:

Wayne Smith, the man exposing the Midazolam mass murder care home scandal called the ‘Covid first wave’, who was about to take part in an Ickonic documentary and has been questioning Tory MP Luke Evans over his ‘Commons’ Midazolam interchange with Hancock, has been found dead.
10:26 PM · Aug 2, 2021

Source: Twitter (https://twitter.com/MSHopkins4/status/1422307930800631813)

1422307930800631813

Gwin Ru

6th August 2021, 21:46

COVID Not Isolated, Cannot Be Located, Does Not EXIST! FOIA Response Reveals Worldwide HOAX! (https://rumble.com/vkt3mh-covid-not-isolated-cannot-be-located-does-not-exist-foia-response-reveals-w.html) 22:17

Stew Peters Show (https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters)
Published August 6, 2021

vi6xh7

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — BREAKING! International FOIA Requests are producing responses that confirm what we have ALL suspected for many months!

COVID-19 may be the biggest HOAX ever perpetuated on global citizens, cannot be located, has not been isolated, and may not EXIST!

www.StewPeters.tv (http://www.StewPeters.tv)
www.DrJaneRuby.com (http://www.DrJaneRuby.com)

https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/freedom-of-information-responses-on-cov-2

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Health-Canada-FinalResponse-A-2020-00208-2020-06-13.pdf

Frankie Pancakes

7th August 2021, 11:57

Man Tears Into FDA During Phone Call About Injection Damage & Death: What Kind of Death Toll Will Be Required To STOP This Nonsense?

https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Fda-call:f

Bill Ryan

14th August 2021, 00:12

Arcturian108

14th August 2021, 01:06

Man Tears Into FDA During Phone Call About Injection Damage & Death: What Kind of Death Toll Will Be Required To STOP This Nonsense?

https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Fda-call:f

Someone in the comments section posted the governmental telephone numbers to call to complain about these "kill shots".
FDA (Food & Drug Administration) +1 888.463.6332
CDC (Center for Disease Control) +1 800.232.4636

Gwin Ru

17th August 2021, 16:49

France's long-time vaccine policy chief: Covid policy is "completely stupid" and "unethical" (https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical) 1:26:40

vihyly

UK Column was recently able to interview top French vaccine expert Professor Christian Perronne (https://theconversation.com/profiles/christian-perronne-775874) on the subject of Covid-19 vaccines.

Professor Perronne is Head of the Medical Department at Raymond Poincaré Hospital in Garches, the teaching hospital for the University of Versailles-St Quentin near Paris. He was the University's Head of Department for Infectious and Tropical Diseases from 1994 onwards, but was fired from that position a few months ago. He is a Fellow of France's biomedical research centre of world standing, the Institut Pasteur, from which he graduated in bacteriology and virology and where he served as Deputy Director of the National Reference Centre for Tuberculosis and Mycobacteria until 1998.

He has chaired many top-level health committees, including the French Specialist Committee for Communicable Diseases, and the High Council on Public Health (https://www.hcsp.fr/explore.cgi/personne?clef=2222) (French acronym: HCSP), which advises the government on public health policy and vaccination policy. He is not anti-vaccine and indeed wrote France's vaccination policy for many years, as well as presiding over the National Consultation Group on Vaccination, also known as the Technical Committee on Vaccination (CTV).

Professor Perronne was also the Vice-President of the European Advisory Group to the World Health Organisation. At national level in France, he has chaired the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Teaching College (CMIT), the Infectious Diseases Federation (FFI, which he co-founded), the High Council for Public Hygiene (CSHP), and the National Medical and Healthcare products Safety Agency (ANSM, previously AFSSAPS), which evaluates the health risks of medicines and is France's sole regulator of biomedical research. Until 2013, he sat on the Scientific Council of the French Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Institute (IMMI/INSERM).

Despite Professor Perronne's extensive knowledge and experience of communicable diseases, vaccines and vaccine policy at national and governmental level in France, he was quickly censored for speaking out on the subject of Covid-19 vaccines, their claimed efficacy and their identifiable risks. In short, he was professionally sidelined, his reputation was attacked (https://www.lemonde.fr/m-le-mag/article/2020/11/18/qui-est-vraiment-christian-perronne-medecin-referent-des-complotistes_6060208_4500055.html) and his professional opinions were censored.

We are therefore delighted to be able to offer this very brave and highly knowledgeable man the opportunity to express his professional opinions and concerns to our audience both in the UK and worldwide, by means of this crucial video interview.

Professor Perronne was joined by Dr Anne-Marie Yim, who kindly facilitated this interview. Anne-Marie is herself highly qualified to speak on vaccines and their effects in the body, having worked as a protein and immune response research expert within the wider pharmaceutical and vaccine industry.

Both our guests speak excellent English, but to assist viewers and listeners who may miss some points due to the inevitable variability of overseas video and audio connections, Alex Thomson from UK Column has kindly provided a transcript of the interview below.

We encourage our audience to share the video interview, this covering article and the transcript as widely as possible, so that as many people as possible can understand the critical concerns around Covid-19 vaccines. By facilitating understanding of these concerns, we hope to help more people make a fully informed choice in their decision to accept or reject a Covid-19 vaccine.

It would be very much appreciated if native speakers of French with sufficiently good English could help by producing a French translation of our discussion, which they would be very welcome to upload to their own websites and/or send to us in either textual, subtitled-video or dubbed-video format. We would like to see the benefits of this interview available to a wide Francophone audience.

It may be helpful to those watching and listening to the video interview to do so with a printed copy of the transcript below, as this will help clarify the audio, conversation and some content.

If our viewers and listeners find the video informative and helpful, we encourage them to freely share this material with a link back to the UK Column home page. Thank you.

===========================================

Transcript of UK Column interview with Professor Christian Perronne and Dr Anne-Marie Yim, July 2021

Brian Gerrish: Welcome to all our UK Column viewers and listeners. We’re very pleased to have two distinguished experts with us, who are going to be talking with us about the subject of Covid-19 and also the vaccination policy which we’re seeing unfolding in the United Kingdom, France and worldwide.

First of all, I’d like to welcome Anne-Marie Yim. Anne-Marie and I have spoken previously, so it’s a pleasure to have her back again. She’s going to be joined tonight by Professor Christian Perronne, and I think we’re going to have an extremely good discussion.

So, Anne-Marie, thank you for joining us. Please will you tell the audience a little bit about your professional background and your qualifications?

Anne-Marie Yim: Hello, and thank you for UK Column for having us tonight with Professor Perronne. It’s a great privilege for us as French citizens to be able to address your British audience.

My name is Anne-Marie Yim, I’m a French citizen, and I was born in Cambodia. I have a Ph.D. in organic chemistry, in peptide proteins, from the University of Montpellier, which is now the Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron. I have been doing a post-doctorate in proteomics, which is identifying membrane proteins, at the University of Michigan, under Professor Samir Hanash, who is a well-known expert in this field. I also worked with Professor Borschitz [name as heard] on the inflammation process in rheumatoid arthritis.

I also have a Master’s in intellectual property, and since 2018, I have been studying the law related to patent engineering [the preparation of patent applications], at CEIPI in Strasbourg. I have also worked as a patent engineer here in Luxembourg, but very briefly, because I didn’t very much like the environment, and then I started my own structure in 2018 and I’m basically a sciences and languages tutor for children from primary school to high school and above, up to university.

Brian Gerrish: Thank you very much for that, Anne-Marie. And Professor Perronne, welcome to UK Column. It’s wonderful to have you with us. I’d just ask that you also tell us a little about yourself, your professional background, and I also understand that since you have spoken out contrary to some of the official government policy around Covid-19 and vaccinations, you’ve been censored, you’ve been prevented from speaking out.

Christian Perronne: Thank you very much for the invitation. I’m Professor Christian Perronne. I work at a university hospital near Paris, with the University of Versailles. I was the head of department for infectious diseases since late 1994, but I was fired from that position a few months ago because of my public statements. I embarrass our government because I was working for various governments, of both the right wing and the left wing of politics, and for fifteen years I was chairman of many committees, the High Council on Public Health, which advises the government on public health policy and vaccination policy. I was also the vice-president of a group of experts for the European region of the WHO.

So I was involved in the management of several epidemics and pandemics, with different governments, and when I saw how the epidemic was managed since February-March 2020, I was amazed. I saw that it was completely crazy. That’s why I spoke out in the media, but now I’m censored in the media.

Brian Gerrish: This brings us to the crux of the matter. I think it’s important that we say to the audience: in the first place, neither yourself nor Anne-Marie Yim are anti-vaccine. Would you like to tell us a little bit more about your position on that?

Christian Perronne: I am not anti-vaccine, because I wrote the vaccination policy for France for a great many years. But the problem is that the products they call “vaccines” for Covid-19 are not really vaccines. That’s my problem.

Brian Gerrish: Can we just press a little bit further? If they’re not vaccines, what would you call them?

Christian Perronne: Maybe genetic modifiers; I don’t exactly know the proper term from a scientific point of view. But when you inject messenger RNA to produce a huge amount of a spike protein, a fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, you can’t control the process. And the problem is that in human cells, we know that RNA might go back to DNA.

Normally, it goes from DNA to RNA—this may be a little bit difficult for a general audience to understand—but it may go in the reverse direction, because we have in our chromosomes, in our genome, genes in our DNA originating from retroviruses, of animal origin centuries or millennia ago, and these can code for enzymes which can code in the reverse direction. So we now know (it’s officially published), and now we find, in the human genome, sequences of DNA corresponding to the RNA of the virus. That’s proof that what I said in an open letter (https://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/sante/article/crise-sanitaire-lettre-ouverte-du-229193) in December [2020], saying that it was dangerous to inject these products, has now been confirmed. And all the governments continue! To me, it’s a great mistake.

Brian Gerrish: And, Anne-Marie, can we ask you the same question? If, in principle, you’re not against vaccination, what are we facing?

Anne-Marie Yim: Experts in virology and working in the field of vaccines are saying that it’s not a vaccine, because usually when you have a virus—for example, the flu, et cetera—you take the virus and you kill it with formaldehyde or with ultraviolet light (which is called attenuation of the virus), so that it’s harmless. You then inject it, along with a physiological serum and usually an adjuvant, to boost your immune system. And that is the definition of a vaccine.

And then, for the core delivery part of the vaccine, if you like: you can’t use different vectors if you wish to inject it. But here, clearly, with Pfizer and Moderna and BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson [Janssen], : Pfizer, Moderna and BioNTech are mRNA vaccines, and AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson are DNA viral. Usually, you [start with] the DNA, and the DNA is transformed into RNA, and the RNA is read, and that brings the ribosome to the S-protein [spike protein].

But here, you have a sequence of a gene—and that’s the first time this has ever been done. So clearly, it’s genetic material that is being injected into your body. And it should not be labelled “vaccine”, because that’s deceiving.

So a lot of scientists are saying it’s a genetic injection. That’s why they [prefer to] call it “a jab”.

Brian Gerrish: Professor Perronne, what I’d like to ask you—and this is for the wider audience, for people who are really trying to get on with their lives and suddenly we’ve had these amazing events unfold—what do you think is actually happening? What is being done around us with respect to Covid-19, the claims of a pandemic, and then the “vaccination” programme?

Why have all of the special effects come into place when—over many, many years, of course—every winter we have flu and people die, but there’s certainly not been these tremendous counter-measures coming into place? What do you think is happening around Covid-19 and the “vaccine” programme, and why is it happening?

Christian Perronne: I think you should put this question to the politicians, because in the history of infectious disease medicine, it has never happened that a state or politicians recommend systematic vaccinations for billions of people on the planet for a disease whose rate of mortality now is 0.05%. That’s a very low rate of mortality! And they’re making everybody afraid that there’s a new so-called “Delta variant” coming from India, but in fact all these variants are less and less virulent, and we now know that [with] this so-called “vaccine”, in the population that is inoculated at large, it is in these people that the variants emerge.

So I don’t understand why the politicians and the various authorities in different countries are asking for mass inoculations while the disease is so mild. And we know that over 90% of cases are in very old people. And we can treat them: we have treatments. There are hundreds of publications showing that early treatments work: there’s hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, zinc, Vitamin D, and so on—it works! There are publications!

So all these products, so-called “vaccines”, are useless, because we can perfectly well control an epidemic. And the best example is in India: there, you have a billion and a half people, with many different states. In the states where they treated people with ivermectin, zinc, Doxycycline and Vitamin D, the epidemic [remained] at a very low rate: it was quite [soon] finished. But in the states where they banned these antibiotic and antiviral treatments which work on the virus, and [where] they promoted the “vaccine” and also promoted Remdesivir (coming from France and Belgium, because Remdesivir was so toxic and not efficacious (https://brandnewtube.com/watch/are-people-dying-misdiagnosed-r-bryan-ardis-dr-reiner-fuellmich-and-dr-wolfgang-wodarg_BSqeH7nhg8I41rM.html): the French and Belgians sent planeloads of Remdesivir to the Indian people!), in these areas of India where they used “vaccines” and Remdesivir, the epidemic came back, with new cases of mortality. That’s proof that if you treat early, you can succeed and the epidemic will be over very rapidly.

In all the countries with massive inoculation of these products (I don’t like the term “vaccination”), we see that you have a recurrence of the epidemic, with new cases of death.

Mike Robinson: Professor Perronne, I’d like to delve into hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in a little more detail in a minute, but before we get there, you said something in your last comment there that just raises a question. Is there currently a pandemic? What you said suggests there isn’t. Was there ever a pandemic?

But, as well as that, with respect to the “variants”: the mainstream media and the politicians are pushing—on the normal Sunday morning politics programmes—once again very strongly that the “Delta variant” and the “subsequent variants” which are coming along are going to have an extremely negative impact on anyone who’s unvaccinated at the moment. They’re saying that this coming winter, the “vaccinated” are going to be fine generally, but the unvaccinated are going to have a very hard time.

So is there a pandemic, was there ever a pandemic, but as well as that, should the unvaccinated be afraid of the current “variants” that are out there, and the coming “variants”?

Christian Perronne: Exactly the reverse! [I]Vaccinated people are at risk of the new variants. In transmission, it’s been proven now in several countries that vaccinated people should be put in quarantine and isolated from society. Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous to others. That’s been proven in Israel now, where I’m in contact with many physicians. They’re having big problems in Israel now: severe cases in hospitals are among vaccinated people. And in the UK also, you had a larger vaccination programme and there are problems [there] also.

But also, the “variants” are not very dangerous. All the “variants” since last year are less and less virulent. That’s always the story in infectious diseases. In my hospital, in March-April 2020, the whole building was full of people with Covid-19: fifty patients. And the so-called "second”, “third”, “fourth waves” were just very small waves, because the hospitals are not full any more. But in the media, they said that all the hospitals were full of patients. That’s not true. Of course, the epidemic was going on, but the “variants” were less and less virulent.
You know, in August 2020, they said, “The ‘Spanish variant’ will kill all of Europe!”—but in the end, there was no real problem.

After that, they said, “The British variant!”, and after that, “The New Zealand variant!”, and “The American variant!”, and “The South African variant!”, and so on. All that is only media stuff. It’s not scientifically-. The “Delta variant” is of very low virulence. If you look at the official rates of the disease and of death in Brazil and India, which were the two last countries in the world with an active transmission of the disease, all the curves are going down. And now, the epidemic is quite over in many countries worldwide.

Yet now, you have governments obliging their citizens to be inoculated with these so-called “vaccines”—and in the countries where they did that, once the epidemic was [already] finished, the epidemic came back, and deaths started again.

In Vietnam, for example, it was an amazing success, they had only a few dozen deaths over more than a year, [the epidemic] was finished, and then one of the ministers said, “We have to vaccinate the whole population!” It’s now nearly mandatory, and after the start of this vaccination campaign, the epidemic came back and fatal cases occurred again. That’s proof that these inoculations are not a vaccine, but may facilitate the reappearance of the disease and also of deaths.

Mike Robinson: And indeed, that’s exactly what we saw in the UK, because in October-November [2020], we saw a new wave coming along, which seemed to plateau out and even to be falling again. As soon as the “vaccination” programme began around 8 December, it peaked—in mid-January, we had quite a peak—and then in February and March, that peak fell very steeply. The graph was very similar to what happened in 2020. And what happened in 2021 has been, according to the politicians, “because of vaccination”. There doesn’t seem to be any consideration in this of what normally happens in a respiratory flu year.

So could you say something about that, and also whether the policy of lockdown and “vaccinations” was the right one, or whether herd immunity, as was originally discussed, would have been a better way to move forward with this?

Christian Perronne: Regarding lockdown, we now have the proof, by comparison between many countries in the world, that lockdown was completely useless, because the countries with the strictest policies of restricting civil liberties and so on, like France—France is a champion of the suppression of liberties today—have the worst results in the world.

In late June 2020, we were [already] able to look at lethality. Lethality is the rate of death from the cases diagnosed. We could maybe speak thirdly [as a third factor in the equation] about PCR tests—PCR tests are not very reliable (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid-19--everything-and-nothing)—but at that time, PCR tests were not available and the diagnosis relied on the physician, on a CT scan of the chest and so on, and it was a good and reliable diagnosis.

France was the worst country in the world. Yemen was a little bit worse than France, but Yemen is a country in war, with destruction of the health system, where hospitals have been destroyed. And imagine that France, which was rated ten years ago by the WHO as the best system in the world, had the worst results of mortality, lethality, in the world!

We cannot really rely on the statistics in many countries, because with PCR tests, which amplify the RNA of the virus when you have small fragments from this swab that you put in the nose, PCR tests are much more amplified, and so we have many, many false positive results.

Now, from August 2020 [until] now, most of the so-called “positive cases” are false positive cases. So they invented the so-called “second wave”, “third wave”. Of course, the epidemic was not over; there were also new cases, and unfortunately people who died. I agree about that. But now, the numbers are not reliable.

Anne-Marie Yim: I agree, because the PCR test was put in place by a scientist whose name was [Christian] Drosten, and it has been shown that with a cut-off of amplification above 25 [cycles]—if you go above 45 or 50 [cycles], as some laboratories are doing—you will get 97% false positives and only 3% true positives. So these tests are very unreliable.

That’s why a physician, Dr Hérault [name as heard], proposed, instead of doing a PCR test, doing serological tests (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30322-4/fulltext#%20), meaning you go into the plasma and you [measure] the dosage of lethal antibodies that are directed against the Covid virus. This is much more reliable. If the [required] dosage is high, it means you are protected and you do not need vaccinations. That’s what we need to tell people: that they are protected.

And, as I said, the wife of [Professor] Adrian [V.S.] Hill, who is the scientist who invented the AstraZeneca vaccine, said that we cannot reach herd immunity through vaccination.

As I think the WHO said, herd immunity should be achieved when you’ve vaccinated at 80% of the population—but that is only a legal definition, and it is not scientifically-based. Therefore, it should be considered null and void. It should not apply. You cannot apply that, because herd immunity is the field of [Professor] Dolores Cahill (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO9yCq7Hmro), an immunologist, so she’s an expert in it, and she said that once you’ve been infected with it and you don’t die, [that is to say] you’ve recovered, your innate immune system [starts] building antibodies for life (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9). Your B lymphocytes, located in the bone marrow, build up antibodies.

There’s a recent study that has been presented by a Thai doctor in Germany, Dr Sucharit . He has been presenting some results (https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/aiovg_videos/an-urgent-message-from-professor-sucharit-bhakdi-covid-vaccine-a-lethal-danger/) saying that they have been dosing the level of antibodies in people who have had the first and the second injection. What they found out is that it’s not the immunoglobulin M that is detected, but immunoglobulin G and A, which means it’s the long-term antibodies that are presented.

If it’s the first time your body’s seen a virus, your body will produce immunoglobulin M, which is the first response. But if the antibody knows the virus and your body has memorised it and recognises it, then you secrete immunoglobulin G and A. And that’s what happens after the first injection and after the second injection. So this proves that we have already achieved herd immunity.

Christian Perronne: Just a comment to complete what Anne-Marie said: we should by now have reliable serological tests. Serology (https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/we-need-reliable-serological-tests-to-track-corona) is where you draw a blood sample and you look for the antibodies that your body has produced against a virus, if you had the disease weeks or months previously. The problem is that no lab in the world has developed a reliable serological test. That’s terrible.

The French physician David Mendels (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrjmY_ffgAg) has published about this, comparing several serological tests (around twelve; I don’t remember the exact number) from China, Germany, France and other countries. They were all assessed by the Pasteur Institute in Paris, France. Most of these tests were bulls**t. They could not correctly identify the number of antibodies.

I think that’s terrible, because I think that the scientific community, [owing to] some conflicts of interest, didn’t [I]want to develop reliable serological tests, because if we had done that, we would be able to see today that most of the British, French, German, Spanish population are now immunised.

But if they showed that, it would be a big problem for the marketing by the pharmacological companies, because they would not be able to impose the vaccination policy, because I think that most people in Europe and other countries worldwide are already immunised. There is herd immunity.

So they did all they could do not to have reliable serological tests, and to me, that’s a great scandal.

Anne-Marie Yim: This is sabotage.

Christian Perronne: Sabotage, yes.

Brian Gerrish: Anne-Marie, I’d like to ask you effectively the same question that I asked Professor Perronne just now, which is the question of what is happening. His response to me was that I would do better to ask the politicians, and I understand his answer, because we’re in very strange times. We have what I’m going to call a scientific-medical policy which is being forced into action in the UK and France and other countries. This is being driven by the politicians. There is very little scientific debate about what’s happening, and people who do challenge the political policies, like Professor Perronne, are finding themselves censored or silenced, or they lose their jobs.

So my question to you is, what do you think is happening? What is Covid-19, and why are we facing the restrictions and the vaccine policies that we are?

Anne-Marie Yim: Everybody has been reporting that during the last year, and the first lockdown in March 2020, every physician, such as general practitioners [family doctors], had received a protocol, like Dr Hawk(e)s [name as heard], or even Dr Perronne, or Dr Francis Christian (https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/saskatoon-surgery-professor-suspended-terminated-from-key-roles) in [Saskatoon,] Canada.

Basically, they’ve been reporting the same thing: that they had been bypassed by the political protocol that has been put to detect and treat the disease at the early stage, meaning that people who were sick with flu from Day 1 to Day 5, with symptoms like coughing or loss of smell, inability to swallow, and so on, were sent to a centre, especially in Luxembourg.

The general practitioners had an order to close their practice. Like Dr Ochs (https://www.luxtimes.lu/en/luxembourg/pandemic-board-suspends-medical-doctor-for-airing-covid-doubts-60ef116cde135b923601a5b5) [in Luxembourg], they closed their practice. They had to work in military centres from 48 to 72 hours, where they didn’t have the right to treat patients but only to prescribe an order for the [patients] to be tested to find out if they were positive. And then, if they were [positive], they were sent back home with a box of paracetamol or Doliprane [French marketing name for paracetamol] or whatever.

And they were waiting for complications to happen, until Day 12, such as that the patient couldn’t breathe any more, they had shortness of breath. And when he had shortness of breath, he would dial the 112 [emergency] number, and then they would send an ambulance and take him to ICU, the emergency [treatment ward], to have an induced coma and to be intubated and have oxygenation. And they were forbidden to take heparin, which is an anti-inflammatory medication, and aspirin, which is an anticoagulant.

And therefore, when they were forbidden to take [one word unclear; possibly 'hydroxychloroquine'] too, there were complications and people would have a stroke. Their lungs were failing, so [they had] cytokine storm, inflammation process, and they would have water in their [lung] alveolae, and then they would lose 40% to 60% of their lung [capacity], and they couldn’t breathe. And the oxygen-CO2 exchange wouldn’t work, so basically they didn’t have oxygen [reaching] the brain or other organs, so they would have complications like necrosis of the tissue.

And [then] they would get a bacterial infection, and then sepsis, and they would die. So they would have only around a 50% chance of recovery.

So now, everybody has agreed that that was a huge political mistake, and that this protocol is a total malpractice. Physicians need to treat patients at an early stage, and not let the disease evolve so that people will die. [Refusal to treat] is called non-assistance à personnes en danger [“failure to assist those in peril” in the French criminal code], so it’s a call of duty for a physician not to let people die. The Hippocratic Oath says primum non nocere, which means “First, do no harm”. So you must not harm patients, and here, clearly, we are harming the patients.

Physicians in France are by people as “four-D doctors”. The four D’s stand for [I]Doliprane [paracetamol], domicile [“send home”], dodo, which means “sleep”, and lastly décès, “death”. That’s totally wrong. And now, all the scientists have been doing scientific research and they found out that paracetamol does indeed trigger cytokine storm, which results in organ failure.

They found out that paracetamol is able to induce oxidative stress, which is when you have a superoxide forming (when you are deoxygenated, a molecule called oxygenase forms, which has great oxidative power). The paracetamol is able to block an enzyme called glutathione reductase.

Consequently, the body is not able to break down these reactive oxidative species (ROS) into water and oxygen. What this means, to be clear, is that paracetamol blocks the body’s mechanism for reducing ROS, resulting in apoptosis, the death of cells. That’s what it means.

So we now know that paracetamol is wrong [as a treatment here].

[B]Mike Robinson: It’s vey interesting that you say that, Anne-Marie, because if I think back to March, April and May 2020, in the British media, it was Ibuprofen that was being demonised as being “dangerous”, which was pushing people towards paracetamol. So is Ibuprofen dangerous in the same way?

Anne-Marie Yim: That’s what people have been reporting, but actually, the disease involves different stages, and it triggers some molecular pathways, such that you cannot administer [the same] drug at a different time and a different dosage.

A very simple example: if you give 200 mg hydroxychloroquine for five days, [within the patient's post-infection range] Day 5 to Day 12, you can clear up or kill the virus. When the viral load is almost nil, you’ve got rid of the virus. But if you administer, for example, 2 mg hydroxychloroquine at the ICU in an induced coma, you can have heart attack problems and it can result in death. That’s what they have been trying to show with the RECOVERY Trial (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPjcxsGNYD4). They are trying to say, “See, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work! It kills patients if you administer it at a late stage.” Of course, [you should] treat it at an early stage!

The same applies to Ibuprofen. Apparently, they said that Ibuprofen should not be administered, but Dr Ochs has found interesting results: that people who have been vaccinated have a very high level of D-dimers [proteins in blood tests indicating a clotting process], and a lot of physicians have been reporting blood clots forming with AstraZeneca.

But those blood clots are very unusual. They are not the result of the normal thrombosis process, with all the cascades where you have fibrinogen being transformed, being triggered by the thrombin, into fibrin, and you have that in combination with platelets, and then you have the clots. [Rather,] here, with Covid-19, you have thrombocytopoenia, which means a very low level of platelets.

So basically, it is coagulations, but that is not induced by the formation of platelets with fibrin as expected. Rather, it is induced by another process, of leukocytes (https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/128/6/753/35780/The-role-of-leukocytes-in-thrombosis) acting with a protein which is on the surface of the endothelial cells of the arteries which is called E-selectin. So it’s the interactions of E-selectin with leukocytes (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120342567) that’s forming these clots.

For example, Professor Dr Ochs prescribes Vitamin C and Ibuprofen to vaccinees who have a high level of D-dimers, a normal leukocyte level with a high level of C-reactive protein (CRP)—which is an indicator of inflammation processes—and a low level of platelets (thrombocytopoenia).

This is very important, because some physicians have found that if you let the disease progress, some people will have clots forming in the occipital lobe, which is the back part of the brain, and if you give too much heparin or too much aspirin [to them], you will dissolve the clots. But then, if you drop below a certain level, if [the clots] are too freed, you start to have haemorrhaging, because you don’t have enough platelets.

So it’s a very, very difficult symptom, and a complex disease, that evolves. And you should administer a given medicine at a certain time and at a certain dosage. The same medicine can either save lives or kill. So Ibuprofen, for example, is administered when there is a high level of D-dimers, a normal level of leukocytes, a high level of CRP, and a low level of platelets. In those conditions, you can administer Vitamin C and Ibuprofen, and the patients recover: the D-dimers come back to normal, and the clots disappear.

So Ibuprofen is a treatment to dissolve the clots, but it should be administered with all the parameters , if you like.

That was a very complex answer, because it’s a very complex disease, actually.

[I][B]Mike Robinson: Thank you. You mentioned the RECOVERY Trial (https://www.recoverytrial.net/). I’d like to ask Professor Perronne about that trial in the UK. [Microbiologist] Professor Didier Raoult (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-hydroxychloroquine-scandal) was quoted as saying that it was “the Marx Brothers doing science”.

The RECOVERY Trial in the UK did seem deliberately to overdose, if that’s not too strong a word, the people taking part in the trial. I think they were using an initial dose of 2400 mg [hydroxychloroquine] and that was followed up over the next ten days with a maximum dose of 800 mg per day. So I was wondering whether you agree with Professor Raoult (https://twitter.com/raoult_didier/status/1272878389305774080/) about that, and whether you have concerns about the announcement that the UK is perhaps about to run a similar trial on Ivermectin.

Christian Perronne: I was amazed by the design of the RECOVERY Trial, because on the first day, I think they used more than four or five times the European Medicines Agency’s maximum authorised dose (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/covid-19-reminder-risks-chloroquine-hydroxychloroquine) of hydroxychloroquine. We know that hydroxychloroquine may be an adjunct of suicide if you take a very high dosage. And we see that in the RECOVERY Trial, the mortality rate was high, much higher than in other trials.

So they modified the evaluation criteria, and we are not able to gain access to the original database at which point in time along the therapeutic course the participants died. They maybe made that information disappear.

I think that we had a problem of excess mortality in this trial due to completely stupid very high dosages of hydroxychloroquine. And when a French journalist asked the professor at, I think, Oxford University, whose name I don’t remember [Martin Landray (https://www.ndph.ox.ac.uk/team/martin-landray)], who was in charge of the trial (https://www.recoverytrial.net/news/statement-from-the-chief-investigators-of-the-randomised-evaluation-of-covid-19-therapy-recovery-trial-on-hydroxychloroquine-5-june-2020-no-clinical-benefit-from-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-in-hospitalised-patients-with-covid-19), “Why did you use this very high and toxic dosage of hydroxychloroquine?”, he replied, “Oh, yes, it’s the usual dosage (https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1274039753109880833) to treat amoebic dysentery (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13738658/).” I was so amazed, because hydroxychloroquine is not the [usual] treatment (https://patient.info/travel-and-vaccinations/travellers-diarrhoea-leaflet/amoebiasis) for amoebic dysentery.

So this guy was probably an epidemiologist—I don’t exactly know his CV [N.B.: Landray is indeed an epidemiologist]—but I saw that he didn’t understand anything about infectious diseases, about anti-infection drugs, and [yet] he was the leader of an international trial. International, because French scientists also participated in that trial.

So, for me, it was something so terrible. I couldn’t imagine that experts could do this kind of trial, and I couldn’t imagine that ethics committees could give authorisation for this kind of trial, with dosages which were very dangerous.

[B]Mike Robinson: Yes, that was Professor Landray. Just to finish that off, are you concerned that the ivermectin trial that the UKGovernment has announced may go in the same direction?

Christian Perronne: Ivermectin is a very good product but it’s not been proven [to the satisfaction of the WHO] that ivermectin works. [For hydroxychloroquine,] we have had many published studies, including randomised studies—because very often last year, when experts said hydroxychloroquine worked very well, there were randomised studies in China showing that it worked well, but after that, the studies by Didier Raoult in Marseilles were not randomised; they were open evaluations. So yes, works very well, but it’s not been proven: there was no placebo, and it was not randomised.

But I agree that when you have over 80%, sometimes 90% success, you don’t need a placebo. That’s a completely stupid idea. Even the WHO published recommendations several years ago that it’s not necessary to have a placebo [test] in a crisis situation when you have non-toxic drugs that work. It’s a completely stupid idea [that placebo tests are essential], coming from scientists who are not scientists any more. They are charlatans, I don’t know what.

So for hydroxychloroquine, I agree, but unfortunately there are not many randomised studies. But for ivermectin, there [I]were randomised studies, and now it’s been proven. And in India now, it’s spectacular. In the Indian states where they widely used ivermectin, the success was huge, and in the states of India where they didn’t use ivermectin but they were inoculating with this so-called “vaccine”, it was a catastrophe.

If you look at the world news, there’s a woman [Dr Soumya Swaminathan, as reported (https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-30th-june-2021) by UK Column News from 1hr17' on 30 June 2021] who was at a high level in the WHO [Chief Scientist] who’s Indian, and now she’s on trial [UK Column note: has been indicted (https://indianbarassociation.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/LEGAL-NOTICE-FOR-CONTEMPT_JUNE-13-2021.pdf)] in India because she said that ivermectin was not useful (https://theprint.in/india/bar-association-serves-legal-notice-to-who-chief-scientist-over-ivermectin-guidelines/676672/) and was toxic and so on.

To think that ivermectin is toxic is completely stupid: hundreds of millions, maybe billions of people in the world have taken ivermectin for [parasitic] diseases, for [lymphatic] filariasis and so on. So it’s a very well-known product. No, it works; it’s completely proven.

But the problem with all the drug [regulatory] agencies in the world—the FDA in the United States, the European Medical Agency, the French drug agency—they all say “No, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work; azithromycin doesn’t work; ivermectin doesn’t work,” despite many, many published proofs that they work. Because if they acknowledge that they do work, it’s impossible for them to market their so-called “vaccines”. That’s the only reason; it’s a marketing reason.

For me, it’s terrible, and I think all these people one day should have to give account for why they took these decisions, which are completely against any ethical basis.

Anne-Marie Yim: I totally agree. Professor Perronne was talking about Professor Didier Raoult from the Marseilles hospital. He’s the first infectious diseases specialist to have healed people [of Covid-19] in France with a protocol of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and—later on—zinc. But at first, there was a big controversy because he had been healing people without randomised, blind tests [as a basis]. That’s [the requirement for] a protocol that has been made by pharmaceutical laboratories when they have a candidate drug in their pipeline: they test it on animals first, and then, if it works, it goes to Phase I, and then they can progress it to Phases II, III and IV, before they get ANM, authorisation to market the drug.

The thing is, when it’s being tested, they give it to physicians, and the physician first chooses a population of about fifty people, and then a hundred, and then 3,000, and so on. Half of them get a placebo (so only a physiological serum) and the other half get the active agent, the drug. And then they compare [to see] whether there is a result or not. And that’s what randomised, blind trials means: “blind” because the physician doesn’t know which patients get the placebo and which group of patients get the real drug.

So the reason why it was so controversial was because Professor Raoult had done his study with, I think, only twenty people or fewer, and he didn’t do the placebo test, meaning that he treated all his patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin—and he got 100% recovery. They said, “Your trial is not valid because you didn’t have a control group” (meaning the placebo group). “You should have given twenty other people the physiological serum.” And he said, “When I have people who are sick and dying, I don’t play with their lives. I had a duty to treat them. That’s why I didn’t do a placebo test.”

And all the physicians backed him up, especially the Chinese community and the African community training for Ph.D. (he was born in Senegal, so he has a strong connection with physicians and researchers in Africa). They were all behind him. They said, “Who cares about a placebo test? It is valid!”

And then he redid a trial with 3,000 people, because they had said, “Your results are not valid because you didn’t have a placebo control group and the cohort—meaning the [number of] people tested—was too small to be significant; you should do it on 3,000 people at least; that’s when you [can] move on to Phase II.” All those protocols have been established by the pharmaceutical laboratories [for] when they are seeking authorisation by the health agencies to market the drug.

[I]Mike Robinson: It’s a bit ironic, then, that the vaccine manufacturers have all gotten rid of their placebo groups, by giving their groups the vaccine!

Anne-Marie Yim: Yes, they were always testing their drugs with placebos. They choose men, women, a spread of ages, so that they have a [representative] group, and they look at whether [participants] have only Covid, or whether they have Covid with co-morbidities—meaning, for example, a weak heart or Type II diabetes. So they very much do look at people [for participation in trials]: their sex, age, whether they have any diseases, whether they [just] have Covid or whether they have Covid plus anything else. And then they will split the group in two, to have the same [spread of] people in each group.

For instance, if they have a woman in her thirties [in the active-drug group], they should have a woman in her thirties [in the placebo group], and so on: with Covid, or with Covid and diabetes, or with Covid and heart failure, or without Covid, [all matched]. And they keep these two populations the same between the group that receives the placebo and the group that receives the drug—in this case, ivermectin.

Christian Perronne: For me, the great scandal [is that] all these experts said it’s not normal that some studies had no randomised control group and so on, but [actually,] in France, the government sponsored two big trials: a DisCoVeRy trial (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507250/) which was called “international” (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04315948), “European”, but [in which] in fact there were only a few people included outside France; and [secondly] the iCovid [as heard] study.

And there was a study comparing different strategies: Remdesivir, Retrovir (which is an anti-inflammatory HIV drug), and I can’t remember all the branches of the study, all the groups. There was also a hydroxychloroquine group, and the iCovid study included [a group treated with] hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin.

When the fraudulent study (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(21)00030-8/fulltext) was published (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(20)30378-7/fulltext) in The Lancet, they said that hydroxychloroquine was “dangerous” or “not effective”. Two days later, the Minister of Health forbade continuation of the hydroxychloroquine groups in the randomised official trials . It was stopped immediately.

But in fact, some slides from the intermediate analysis of these two studies leaked out on the Internet, and we could see clearly that when the Minister said “Stop hydroxychloroquine!”, the only group that had an efficiency of less death was the group using either hydroxychloroquine in the DisCoVeRy study, or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin in the iCovid study.

It was not yet statistically significant, because from DisCoVeRy, it was planned to have 1,500patients [treated with that protocol] but in fact they had only three thousand[I][presumably Professor Perronne meant to say 'three hundred'], and for iCovid it was the same.

So it was not completely significant, but when you look at the curves, it was [I]spectactular: [deaths] with hydroxychloroquine were much lower.

And then, the experts responsible for these studies didn’t show these slides—of course, I got the slides another way. They said, “Oh, no, hydroxychloroquine is finished!” But in fact, that was not [seen] at all in our studies, but it was a great public lie coming from scientific experts.

And unfortunately, two weeks later it the Lancet study was fraudulent, but the minister never changed his policy; he continued to ban hydroxychloroquine. And now, we have people saying that I’m not a scientific guy. They are unscientific. They are the charlatans. They don’t rely on good science.

And I’m deeply shocked at all these so-called “experts” who are advisers to our authorities, who are on the TV every day, and most of them have huge conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies that make Remdesivir, that also make the “vaccine” and so on. It’s a great scandal.

I think that all these guys in the media should be fired, if we are to follow French law, and also [those] in other European countries should be fired from the official committees. They should not be advisors any more.

They should not be chairmen of groups. I was Chairman of the High Council on Public Health for Infectious Diseases for fifteen years, so I know all about that; I know the whole system. For me, it’s a great scandal.

Anne-Marie Yim: Yes, it’s corruption, it’s corruption. Basically, they are lying, and they are discarding good scientific people like Professor Perronne or Professor Raoult, and trying to discredit them publicly. And we know that Remdesivir enhances the inflammatory process (https://brandnewtube.com/watch/are-people-dying-misdiagnosed-r-bryan-ardis-dr-reiner-fuellmich-and-dr-wolfgang-wodarg_BSqeH7nhg8I41rM.html) and does not work at all compared to hydroxychloroquine.

So they are trying to block studies, as Professor Perronne says; trying to lie to the general public, saying that hydroxychloroquine does not work and Remdesivir does work. It’s the same with ivermectin: they’re trying to conduct these studies, but then they are cheating in the results.

It is shameful. It’s a scandal. Scientifically, it’s a fraud, and politically, it’s a crime. The Indian Bar Association are right now suing (https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/06/india-could-sentence-who-chief-scientist-to-death-for-misleading-over-ivermectin-and-killing-indians.html) the Chief Scientist of the [WHO in India] for all the policy going on, which has resulted worldwide in more than three million deaths.

Brian Gerrish: I think we would absolutely agree: we’re looking at charlatans. We’re looking at politicians, and also members of health organisations, who say they are there to protect the public, but the reality is they’re not protecting the public; they’re allowing the public to be harmed as a result of these so-called “vaccinations”.

Could I come back to Professor Perronne again, and ask for his opinion on the vaccine adverse reactions? We’ve now collected considerable data about the adverse reactions, and here in the UK (https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports), the figures that are collected by the regulatory authority, the MHRA, are now at over one million adverse effects recorded, and deaths are at about 1,400, so this is significant damage.

Professor Perronne, what is your view of the adverse effects that are being recorded at the moment?

Christian Perronne: In the past, with other, real vaccines, there were some crises, problems with some side effects; but neither for myself nor among friends and family have I ever seen such severe side effects. I even know of two deaths around me: the mother of a friend, and a guy who was the cousin of another friend, who died from the “vaccine”.

Speaking personally as a French citizen, I see around me cases of death, cases of paralysis. One woman, a neighbour who was vaccinated, several days afterwards developed malignant arterial hypertension; she had never had hypertension [high blood pressure] her whole life. Several thromboses, partial paralysis, arthralgic [joint pain] problems—around me, I have seen many cases.

I think that the databases [of adverse effects] in some countries are not accurate, because in these cases that I could see, I know that the general practitioners [family doctors] did not want to report the death or the side effect to the authorities, saying, “No, it’s just a coincidence!”

So, many, many side effects are not being reported. If there is a stroke, they say, “Oh no, it’s not the vaccine; it’s [just] a stroke; this person was old, so it’s normal to have a stroke.”

Because I speak with my patients (I have some patients who are high-level directors of companies), I know—they tell me—that the physicians in the big companies where many employees were “vaccinated” (I don’t like using this term “vaccinated”) [saw that they] had problems, but the occupational health doctors didn’t want to report the cases to the French authority. So it’s not being connected with the “vaccine”; it’s “coincidence”.

If we compare the French database with the Dutch database, with the same proportion of patients vaccinated , [B]the rate of reporting is much lower in France[as reported (https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-30th-june-2021) by UK Column News from 22:50 on 30 June 2021]. That’s not normal! But if we then look at the European level, we see that there are huge numbers of deaths and serious side effects.

We know—it’s officially acknowledged by the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control in the United States—that many young people who are “vaccinated” (let’s say “inoculated”) have had heart problems: myocarditis, inflammation of the cardiac muscle, or pericarditis, inflammation of the envelope around the heart. So that’s official; it’s reported worldwide.

And if we look at the comparison of the rate of mortality in others, we find that in vaccinated children, it could be close. As we know, children don’t develop the disease [Covid-19] at a high rate, and very few children have had severe cases, and the rate of [Covid] death in children is near zero. We now know that the risk of death and of severe problems is much higher if you are vaccinated than not vaccinated [as a child].

And now, we see in some countries that most of the problems, of the cases, are coming from vaccinated people, who are transmitting the disease. And of course, this is not official language, but in France, the government lies: they say, “Although we have seen some cases, it is the fault of the unvaccinated for contaminating the vaccinated.”

I’m a Fellow of the Louis Pasteur Institute; I’ve worked in the field of vaccination for years and years. This is the first time in my life that I’ve heard from companies, from the manufacturers, from the ministers, from the WHO [such talk]: “It’s a very good vaccine—but we have to tell you that if you are vaccinated, you can get the disease anyway! And we’re not sure, but it may slow the transmission.”

This is not normal. If you are vaccinated with an efficient vaccine, you are [I]protected. You should not have to wear a mask any more; you should have a normal life. But in fact, in many countries, they say, “Oh, you’ve been vaccinated, but you’re not really protected.” And now they say to the vaccinated—who are supposed to be protected, who should have confidence!—“Oh, the unvaccinated will contaminate you!”

Now, as regards the “health passport”: you know that they published [this proposal] five weeks ago in Israel, and they were close to civil war in Israel. They were fighting inside families. The “vaccine” was mandatory for physicians, for students. And now, they’ve stopped that [requirement].

In France now, President Macron will speak tomorrow evening [12July], and is expected to say [as he duly did (https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2021/07/why-emmanuel-macron-gambling-vaccine-passports-france)] that vaccination will be mandatory for health care workers, health providers and to participate in some [aspects of] public life. I think this is a great scandal, and I think there will be a civil war if we go this way.

Brian Gerrish: Anne-Marie, could I ask you the same question about vaccine adverse reactions? We are seeing the figures collected here in the UK; we know that the MHRA says (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/greater-manchester-vaccination-centre-and-mhras-yellow-card-adr-scam-part-1) [that] perhaps only 10% of the most serious reactions are [ever] recorded, and the MHRA also says that perhaps only 2% to 4% of the more minor adverse reactions are recorded.

So there is gross under-recording of the serious reactions, and yet the public is constantly told that they’re safe. What do you think is the main reason for such a huge increase in adverse reactions from the “vaccine”?

Anne-Marie Yim: As you say, the official numbers of deaths from “vaccinations” are around 15,000 [across Europe]. It was 14,000 but it’s been increasing, and we now officially have 15,000 deaths [registered in] the Pharmacovigilance Network (https://www.adrreports.eu/en/eudravigilance.html)[Eudravigilance]. And indeed, it is under-reported. People are saying 10%; in France, sometimes even 5%. So you should multiply this number by [up to] a hundred, yes.

First, why under-reported? Because it should be done by a medical doctor: for example, when you have a vaccination and you experience adverse reactions, you should go and see a physician, your MD, and you should tell him, and then he is supposed to file a form online, and it takes fifteen minutes, and it goes to a network.

For example, in Luxembourg, we need to send it to the group in Nancy [eastern France], because we work with the [French] Région du Grand Est. That’s the reason why the numbers are lower [than reality], are being under-reported: whether the CDC or VAERS, all those official sites are reporting blood clots with AstraZeneca, and with Pfizer you have Bell's palsy.

As Professor Perronne says, you can have myocarditis, especially among the young. That’s what Dr Hervé Seligmann said [Part 1 (https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/no-smoke-without-fire-part-1-international-scientific-experts-discuss-covid-19-and-vaccines) | Part 2 (https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/no-smoke-without-fire-part-2-international-scientific-experts-discuss-covid-19-vaccine) of UK Column interview]: in Israel, they have seen young people getting myocarditis, especially men under 45. As Professor Perronne says, there is a correlation : a lot of old people are dying and not young people.

Why? Because [the young] have a high level of glutathione, and so they are not dying; they’re protected, compared with the oxidative stress induced by the vaccination .

I want to emphasise that although I know we’re not talking about treatments, it’s very important [to point out] that [B]people who have intravenous glutathione injections recover very well, because this liberates [them from] the oxidative stress-induced effects.

The secondary adverse [reactions] are basically cytokine storm, which leads to organ failure. And it can be the heart, the brain, the lung or the kidney. You can have the process . The pulmonary disease evolves very rapidly, and when it develops to a certain stage, you have this inflammation process and these clots that then go everywhere, into your organs.

If they go into your brain, you have [a thrombosis]; if it goes into your heart, of course, and you have all this inflammation process, this leaking of the water into the organ, then the organ stops functioning.

Basically, you’re being shut down; your vital functions are being shut down. And it can be very abrupt and very brutal, and it can all happen in 24 hours.

And now, people have been discovering that there’s this graphene oxide: a Spanish team has been reporting (https://www.laquintacolumna.net/) this graphene oxide [entering] the brain, that is also causing Guillain-Barré syndrome, and that is eating up the myelin, [the coating] on the nerves.

People have also been reporting allergic reactions, like anaphylactic shock, and also sometimes bleeding from the skin.

These are very severe adverse reactions, and yet the media keep telling us, “The vaccine is safe, is efficient, and the benefits greatly outweigh the risks, so we should keep on vaccinating people”!

I think this is all propaganda. [B]The reality is, the vaccine doesn’t work. It kills in 42% of these cases, but if you bring that into a randomised population, that means it kills all the time, it kills 100% of the time. So basically, it triggers the ageing process and cancer, and this is only the beginning. I think this is [just] the beginning of what we are going to see.

They are lying to us. They say it’s safe; no, it’s not safe, it kills people. It does kill people. It does not protect against the variants; it does not protect against the transmissibility; it does not protect against the disease.

So [I]why are we having it? People who are taking the “vaccine” say, “Oh, it’s because I want to travel. I want to go on vacation. I want to go to school. I want to be able to take my exam. I want to be able to go to the restaurant. I want to be able to have a normal life.” That’s basically what people are saying.

One of the main [phenomena] being reported is the magnetic test at the site of vaccination: it sticks. People have been measuring these, and there’s an electromagnetic field that is [I]engineered.

People have been digging into this and have found that there’s a lipid nanoparticle (https://acuitastx.com/technology/lipid-nanoparticles/) that is being manufactured by this company called Acuitas Therapeutics [of Canada], who are providing Pfizer/BioNTech [and] Moderna.

They [the lipid nanoparticles used to deliver Covid-19 vaccines] have three components: basically, first, phospholipids (a fat), binase [as heard], but it also contains ferrous oxide (https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8), and polyethylene glycol (https://research.thea.ie/bitstream/handle/20.500.12065/3045/Cytotoxicity%20review%20priyanka2018.pdf). [The ferrous oxide] is inserted [as heard] with polyethylene glycol into the phospholipid layer. And that [including the ferrous oxide]goes into your brain. It can cross the blood-brain barrier. Normally, it shouldn’t, but it can go and pass into your brain.

And there is also this graphene oxide. Basically, [I]everything about this injection is poisonous: not just this messenger RNA and these spike proteins, which cause inflammations and which can be integrated into [your] DNA, but also the graphene oxide. So clearly, from every point of view, this is a poison.

Brian Gerrish: Thank you very much for taking us through what is a very difficult subject for a lot of people to hear about, but we have to be realistic about the concerns over what’s happening.

I’d like to come back to Professor Perronne. Just one last question, as you’ve covered a lot of ground. Professor, I’d like to ask you: if you were in control at the moment, if you held power in France, what would you do to solve the situation that you see?

Christian Perronne: First of all, I would stop the so-called “vaccination” campaign. I would promote, among general practitioners, early treatment with ivermectin, zinc, Vitamin C and Doxycycline or azithromycin.

Also, I would encourage the strict isolation of symptomatic patients, because that’s the way to control the transmission: just two weeks of isolation is enough, during the contagious period of symptomatic people, but strictly isolated, with a mask if needed and so on. Treat them very early. And if you do that, it rapidly ends [transmission].

I’m in favour of strict isolation of symptomatic patients, but the lockdowns which were embedded in many, many countries in the world are completely stupid. You don’t stop an epidemic with a lockdown, with masks in the street! That was shown in Denmark (https://carterheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/effectiveness-of-adding-a-mask-recommendation-to-other-public-health-measures-to-prevent-sars-cov-2-infection-in-danish-mask-wearers-nov-2020.pdf), with randomised studies with people wearing and not wearing masks. The mask is not efficient.

So I would immediately re-establish all civil liberties, because now, France is no longer a democracy; it’s like a dictatorship, with only five or six people around the table now able to bypass Parliament and say “vaccination is mandatory” and so on.

So re-establish liberty; re-establish democracy; stop these useless so-called “vaccination” campaigns for a disease with a very, very low mortality rate; and immediately treat patients without confirmation [as heard].

And also, stop PCR testing of the asymptomatic general population. It’s completely anti-scientific. The people who developed the PCR test never, never did PCR tests of asymptomatic patients at large scale, because you get a huge rate of false positives.

So it’s very simple: you isolate the cases, you treat them, and it’s over.

Brian Gerrish: Thank you very much indeed, Professor.

And, Anne-Marie, what would you say to your scientific colleagues who at the moment don’t seem to see the dangers that you see?

Anne-Marie Yim: I think they do all see it, but they are scared.

There are two types of scientists: those who [engage in] bribery and who are corrupted, with Dr Fauci and all the others, with Bill Gates and all of those people. They are in the cockpit right now.

Good professors, like Professor Perronne and Professor Raoult, or Dr Ochs, are being sued and taken to tribunals by the [profession] of medicine itself. The Medical Council is suing French doctors, and it’s the same in France, in Canada, in Luxembourg; we see the same pattern everywhere. It’s a pattern that we are seeing here.

You know, we have to have the courage to go to these people and say, “You are corrupted. All the policies that you are imposing are nonsense. It’s not scientifically-based; it’s not legally-based. You are trying to take away our liberties. You are putting social pressure on us: if you don’t get vaccinated, you will lose your job. And if you want to travel, you need the vaccine. This is blackmail.”

All the scientists should have the courage to say, “Enough is enough.” Not only scientists; lawyers too. They all know the truth. Everybody knows the truth; it’s just a matter of whether we fight or not fight. Do we conform to society, to the system, or don’t we? And I think that our thirst for liberty and freedom should overcome our fear, and we should just say, “Stop. Stop this vaccination campaign. Stop it, and stop it now.”

Brian Gerrish: Thank you very much for joining us. It’s been really fantastic to hear the information that you’ve put across on this very important subject.

We hope that by broadcasting this material, other people will start to wake up to the dangers of the “vaccine” programme.

So, Professor Perronne and Anne-Marie Yim, we hope very much that your information will help many people in our audience and further afield to understand what is happening, and to become part of putting a stop to it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

For an earful on Fauci's home-made poison Remdesivir:

Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg - Depopulation By Any Means! (https://www.bitchute.com/video/jTiU5Bv5Idge/)

Gwin Ru

19th August 2021, 20:36

Dr. Roger Hodkinson: "It's all been a pack of lies" (https://www.brighteon.com/2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd) 04:15

https://s.gravatar.com/avatar/d6e8e491641f6d498392b4fd02704405?s=480&r=pg&d=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.auth0.com%2Favatars%2Fhr.png (https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport) Health Ranger Report (https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport)

Published 4 hours ago |

2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd

Bill Ryan

19th August 2021, 22:24

Dr. Roger Hodkinson: "It's all been a pack of lies" (https://www.brighteon.com/2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd) 04:15

Health Ranger Report
(https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport)https://brighteon.com/2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd

Published 4 hours ago

2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd~~~

Excellent. :muscle: That's about the strongest 4 minutes one could possibly forward to anyone they know who doesn't yet understand what's going on.

Tintin

20th August 2021, 10:02

Joel Smalley continues to produce excellent research.

Although SARS-CoV-2 is of course not a "flu" his data crunching is rock solid.

1428324108299821059

onawah

20th August 2021, 19:16

CDC’s Own Stats Show a “Pandemic of the Vaccinated” with Vaccine Injuries – 2,604,121 Injuries from 571,831 People Reported
8/20/21
https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/cdcs-own-stats-show-a-pandemic-of-the-vaccinated-with-vaccine-injuries-2604121-injuries-from-571831-people-reported/
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/08/VAERS-Symptoms.jpg

"The VAERS database was updated today, and there are now 595,622 cases with 2,714,620 reported symptoms.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Last month we reported on how the CDC’s proclamation that the U.S. is now facing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was a lie, with no stats to back up this assertion.

They claimed that “99%” of those being hospitalized with COVID were “unvaccinated,” even though reports and other stats proved just the opposite.

Even Republican Governors are perpetuating this lie to the American people. See:
Republican Governors Join Biden and CDC in Blaming “Unvaccinated” for Alleged New COVID Hospitalizations See:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/republican-governors-join-biden-and-cdc-in-blaming-unvaccinated-for-alleged-new-covid-hospitalizations/

As regular readers of Health Impact News know, the U.S. Government has a tracking system to track reported injuries following vaccines, called “VAERS,” the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html

Here is what they say about the Government vaccine reporting system, which is on the hhs.gov website:
https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/08/About-VAERS.jpg

The CDC and FDA typically add new cases of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines every week, and you can read about the latest data dump into VAERS from this past weekend here:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-records-show-12791-dead-and-682873-injuries-following-covid-19-experimental-shots/

As the U.S. Government admits above in the “About Us” section of VAERS, it is a “passive reporting system,” and “relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA.”

So the big question has always been, just what percentage of actual vaccine injuries and deaths are represented in VAERS?

According to a report in 2011 that was prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, less than 1%.

Less Than 1% of Vaccine Injuries Reported in the Government National Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

https://rumble.com/vfn8p7-problems-with-the-cdc-vaers-passive-system.html

The last VAERS report from this past weekend listed:

12,791 deaths
16,044 permanent disabilities
70,667 emergency room visits
51,242 hospitalizations
13,139 life threatening events
following COVID-19 shots.

But what about total injuries reported following these shots? They are listed as “symptoms” in the VAERS database, and I had never done a search on total symptoms reported following COVID-19 shots.

So I did one today, and the search result returned 2,604,121 reported symptoms from 571,831 cases. You can see the results of the search here:
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&VAX=COVID19

There are over 10,500 kinds of symptoms reported, and I copied that table into an Excel spreadsheet and sorted them from most reported symptoms to least, and the results are below.

To be fair, not all of the symptoms are injuries. They list some benign things such as lab tests, for example. But they are mostly injuries, because this is the purpose of the VAERS system, as the government admits. The purpose is to track injuries and deaths to see if there are any concerns.

The CDC says there are no concerns. The few concerns they do admit, they brush aside as “rare.” They claim blood clots, for example, are rare. (Source.)

They come up with very low numbers for a serious adverse event by narrowly defining the symptom, and ignore all others.

For example, if you search the table below for “thrombosis,” the most common “symptom” for blood clots, you will find 80 different kinds of thrombosis, with around 10,000 reports, in a passive system that may only represent 1% of the population of COVID-19 vaccinated.

Does that sound “rare”?

When all these COVID-19 vaccinated people start suffering from blood clots, where do you think they go?

To the hospitals.

And yet the CDC, FDA, and politicians want us to believe that there is a “pandemic of unvaccinated” and that “99% of hospitalizations” right now are unvaccinated?

Their own stats prove they are all LIARS!

I don’t know if this article, or another one that reports something similar to this will go viral enough to attract the attention of the corporate media or Big Tech “fact checkers” who will come in and try to cherry pick something in the stats that they will claim “proves” this is false, but there is one thing that nobody can refute:

From these 571,831 cases and 2,604,121 reported symptoms, NOT A SINGLE ONE IS FROM SOMEONE WHO IS UNVACCINATED WITH COVID-19."
Source: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&VAX=COVID19

See also:
Over 32,000 People DEAD in Brazil Following COVID-19 Vaccines According to Official Media Report
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/over-32000-people-dead-in-brazil-following-covid-19-vaccines-according-to-official-media-report/

21,766 DEAD Over 2 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/21766-dead-over-2-million-injured-50-serious-reported-in-european-unions-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-shots/

https://rumble.com/vfn8p7-problems-with-the-cdc-vaers-passive-system.html
vd12j3

ExomatrixTV

24th August 2021, 23:58

Trust The Science? CDC Counts People Dying Within 14 Days Of Jab As “Unvaccinated (https://www.infowars.com/posts/trust-the-science-cdc-counts-people-dying-within-14-days-of-jab-as-unvaccinated/)”

A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7034e5-H.pdf) is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.

Yahoo Finance (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/unvaccinated-hospitalized-coronavirus-doctor-cdc-202334703.html?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_recirculation) published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”

Gwin Ru

28th August 2021, 15:26

...

https://s.gravatar.com/avatar/d6e8e491641f6d498392b4fd02704405?s=480&r=pg&d=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.auth0.com%2Favatars%2Fhr.png (https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport)
Health Ranger Report (https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport)

Drs. Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman interviewed by Mike Adams: Why the "virus" pandemic is a FARCE (https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea) 1:01:25

Published 20 hours ago |

Drs. Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman interviewed by Mike Adams.

08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea

Tintin

8th September 2021, 09:28

Bill Ryan

13th September 2021, 18:11

The opening couple of minutes in Mike Adams' situation update for today shows a leaked Zoom video conference in which hospital marketers discuss how to falsify covid numbers.

(If anyone has the shorter original, do please post it as then that's much easier to share with others. :thumbsup: )

https://brighteon.com/0341ddc2-5128-473e-a83b-ebadd22d2090

0341ddc2-5128-473e-a83b-ebadd22d2090

Gwin Ru

13th September 2021, 18:38

[...]
(If anyone has the shorter original, do please post it as then that's much easier to share with others. :thumbsup: )
[...]
...

1437105028494503936

CAUGHT ON VIDEO — ‘We need to be more scary to the public, we need to inflate the real Covid numbers’… (https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/caught-on-video-we-need-to-be-more-scary-to-the-public-we-need-to-inflate-the-real-covid-numbers/)

Posted by Kane on September 13, 2021 4:50 am

Zoom meeting from a hospital in North Carolina with Dr. Mary Rudyk and Carolyn Fisher discussing inflating Covid numbers by counting recovered patients as active Covid patients.

“I think we have to be more blunt, we have to be more forceful, we have to say something coming out, you know you don’t get vaccinated, you know you’re going to die. I mean, let’s just be really blunt to these people.”
WILMINGTON – Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center has issued a statement after a video of an internal discussion on how the hospital reports its COVID patient count was leaked on social media.

The just over two-minute video sparked a heated discussion online, with many pointing to the conversation as proof hospitals were falsifying or artificially inflating case counts.

Dr. Mary Rudyk, who previously served as Chief of Medical Staff for NHRMC, responds bluntly, saying she feels the hospital’s messaging needs to be “a little bit more scary for the public.” She then proposes including patients she characterizes as “post-COVID” in the hospital’s case count – the primary source of the outrage on social media.

SOURCE (https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/wilmington-hospital-system-debunks-viral-video-used-to-justify-conspiracy-theories-about-covid-19-patients/19872754/)

gord

15th September 2021, 04:18

A good and very long article (50 pages). This is just the introduction and table of contents.

================

September 2, 2021

The Snake-Oil Salesmen and the COVID-Zero Con: A Classic Bait-And-Switch for a Lifetime of Booster Shots (Immunity as a Service) (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html)

If a plumber with a lifetime of experience were to tell you that water runs uphill, you would know he is lying and that the lie is not accidental. It is a lie with a purpose. If you can also demonstrate that the plumber knows in advance that the product he is promoting with that lie is snake oil, you have evidence for a deliberate con. And once you understand what's really inside that bottle of snake oil, you will begin to understand the purpose of the con.

One of the most common reasons given for mass COVID vaccinations is the idea that if we reach herd immunity through vaccination, we can starve the virus out of existence and get our lives back. It's the COVID-Zero strategy or some variant of it.

By now it is abundantly clear from the epidemiological data that the vaccinated are able to both catch and spread the disease. Clearly vaccination isn't going to make this virus disappear. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how ridiculous all this has become.

But a tour through pre-COVID science demonstrates that, from day one, long before you and I had even heard of this virus, it was 100% inevitable and 100% predictable that these vaccines would never be capable of eradicating this coronavirus and would never lead to any kind of lasting herd immunity. Even worse, lockdowns and mass vaccination have created a dangerous set of circumstances that interferes with our immune system's ability to protect us against other respiratory viruses. They also risk driving the evolution of this virus towards mutations that are more dangerous to both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated alike. Lockdowns, mass vaccinations, and mass booster shots were never capable of delivering on any of the promises that were made to the public.

And yet, vaccination has been successfully used to control measles and even to eradicate smallpox. So, why not COVID? Immunity is immunity, and a virus is a virus is a virus, right? Wrong! Reality is far more complicated... and more interesting.

This Deep Dive exposes why, from day one, the promise of COVID-Zero can only ever have been a deliberately dishonest shell game designed to prey on a lack of public understanding of how our immune systems work and on how most respiratory viruses differ from other viruses that we routinely vaccinate against. We have been sold a fantasy designed to rope us into a pharmaceutical dependency as a deceitful trade-off for access to our lives. Variant by variant. For as long as the public is willing to go along for the ride.

Exposing this story does not require incriminating emails or whistleblower testimony. The story tells itself by diving into the long-established science that every single virologist, immunologist, evolutionary biologist, vaccine developer, and public health official had access to long before COVID began. As is so often the case, the devil is hidden in the details. As this story unfolds it will become clear that the one-two punch of lockdowns and the promise of vaccines as an exit strategy began as a cynical marketing ploy to coerce us into a never-ending regimen of annual booster shots intentionally designed to replace the natural "antivirus security updates" against respiratory viruses that come from hugs and handshakes and from children laughing together at school. We are being played for fools.

This is not to say that there aren't plenty of other opportunists taking advantage of this crisis to pursue other agendas and to tip society into a full-blown police state. One thing quickly morphs into another. But this essay demonstrates that never-ending boosters were the initial motive for this global social-engineering shell game ― the subscription-based business model, adapted for the pharmaceutical industry. "Immunity as a service".

So, let's dive into the fascinating world of immune systems, viruses, and vaccines, layer by layer, to dispel the myths and false expectations that have been created by deceitful public health officials, pharmaceutical lobbyists, and media manipulators. What emerges as the lies are peeled apart is both surprising and more than a little alarming.

“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” - Sherlock Homes” ― Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-wQ9vZ5CX6As/YRQmSTkLo3I/AAAAAAAABmA/anjKNKhR26clgKdBfTVjJA9mtOe6lMBNwCLcBGAsYHQ/w400-h240/Virus.jpg (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-wQ9vZ5CX6As/YRQmSTkLo3I/AAAAAAAABmA/anjKNKhR26clgKdBfTVjJA9mtOe6lMBNwCLcBGAsYHQ/s960/Virus.jpg)

Table of Contents:

Viral Reservoirs: The Fantasy of Eradication (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Reservoirs)

SARS: The Exception to the Rule? (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#SARS)

Fast Mutations: The Fantasy of Control through Herd Immunity (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Mutations)

Blind Faith in Central Planning: The Fantasy of Timely Doses (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Doses)

Spiked: The Fantasy of Preventing Infection (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Spiked)

Antibodies, B-Cells, and T-Cells: Why Immunity to Respiratory Viruses Fades So Quickly (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Immunity)

Manufacturing Dangerous Variants: Virus Mutations Under Lockdown Conditions — Lessons from the 1918 Spanish Flu (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Variants)

Leaky Vaccines, Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, and the Marek Effect (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Leaks)

Anti-Virus Security Updates: Cross-Reactive Immunity Through Repeated Exposure (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Updates)

The Not-So-Novel Novel Virus: The Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Outbreak Proved We Have Cross-Reactive Immunity (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Novel)

Mother Knows Best: Vitamin D, Playing in Puddles, and Sweaters (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Mother)

The Paradox: Why COVID-Zero Makes People More Vulnerable to Other Viruses (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Paradox)

Introducing Immunity as a Service - A Subscription-Based Business Model for the Pharmaceutical Industry (It was always about the money!) (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Echoes)

The Path Forward: Neutralizing the Threat and Bullet-Proofing Society to Prevent This Ever Happening Again. (https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Forward)

mountain_jim

15th September 2021, 12:45

Great article!

I will just quote the final Path Forward here:

https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html#Forward

Now we know we've been played, how we've been played, and why we've been played. Again. Just like during the 2009 Swine Flu con. Only bigger, bolder, and better. They learned from their mistakes. We didn't.

But now that you see the con, you can't unsee it. And now that you understand the threat and how the game is being played, there is a weight that comes off your shoulders.

When you know there's a threat, but you don't know exactly what it is, every movement in the grass might be a tiger or a snake or a scorpion. It's paralysing and exhausting to defend yourself against an invisible unknown and they have used that fear masterfully against us to keep us frozen. But once you spot the tiger in the grass, you know where to direct your focus, your feet become unglued, your voice becomes bold, and you regain the clarity of thought to defend yourself.

The con is clear. So, we can let go of all the worries about depopulation and bioweapons and all the gaslighting about variants and focus all our might on stopping this runaway train before it takes us over the cliff into a police state of no return. Rent-seeking snake-oil salesmen don't set out to kill their customers in a subscription-based economy. It's just that they are not that bothered if you're maimed or killed as collateral damage to their wild reckless con. They are the threat. They are the danger that deserves our undivided attention. Stand up. Speak out. Refuse to play along. Stopping this requires millions of voices with the courage to say NO — at work, at home, at school, at church, and out on the street.

"Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis & foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored." — Martin Luther King Jr.

Compliance is the glue that holds tyranny together. Non-compliance breaks it apart. One person alone cannot stop this. But if millions find the courage to raise their voices and the courage to refuse to participate in the system on these tyrannical medical terms, it will throw the system into such a crisis and create such a tension that the community will be forced to confront the issue. Without enough truckers, no-one eats. Without enough medical staff, hospitals close. Without enough workers, supply chains break. Without enough policemen, laws cannot be enforced. Without enough garbage collectors, cities grind to a halt. Without enough cashiers, box stores cannot stay open. Without enough administrators, institutions cease to function. Without enough staff, corporations lose profits. Without enough servers, restaurants cannot serve their customers. And without enough customers, businesses are brought to their knees.

Tyranny is not sustainable if the system grinds to a halt. Make it grind by being a thorn in everyone's side until they give us back our freedoms and end this ridiculous charade. They are trying to impose vaccine passports and mandatory vaccinations. But we hold the cards... but only if we are bold enough to stand up even at the risk of finding ourselves standing alone. Courage begets courage. It was Martin Luther King's secret power. It must be ours.

Now that you see the con, you also know the simple recipe to make this virus go away before their reckless policies turn it a monster virus for real. Remember 1918. End the war on the virus. Let the young folks come out of the trenches. Let people go back to their lives. Provide focused protection for the vulnerable. That is how this virus fades into the history books.

It's time to be bold. It's time to call out the fraudsters. And it's time to reclaim the habits, values, and principles that are required to fix our democratic and scientific institutions to prevent this from ever happening again.

Feudalism was one giant stinking cesspool of self-serving corruption. Individual rights, free markets, the democratic process, and limited government were the antidotes that freed humanity from that hierarchical servitude. It seems we have come full circle. The COVID con is a symptom, not the cause, of a broken system.

Modern liberal democracy all around the world was inspired by the system of checks and balances that America's Founding Fathers built to prevent government from being co-opted by the special interests of its leaders, institutions, corporations, and most influential citizens. The ink was barely dry when those principles began to be ignored by those with ever greater enthusiasm for an all-powerful referee to manage even the most intimate details of how everyone lives their lives. After two and a half centuries of effort the admirers of big government have achieved their heart's desire. And what a glorious and rotten cesspool of self-serving corruption it is.

But the principles laid out by America's Founding Fathers remain as true today as the day they were written and are waiting to be rediscovered. If there is one culprit who deserves to shoulder more blame than any other for the fiasco of the last 18 months, it is society itself for allowing itself to fall prey to the siren song of big government, the illusion that there can ever be a benevolent, virtuous, and incorruptible referee. He who creates the red tape, he who has the keys to the treasury, he who wields the power of the tax collector, and he who commands those sent to enforce the laws will always have an entourage of self-serving charlatans, rent seekers, and parasites following him wherever he goes. So, keep his powers on a very short leash to keep other people's hands off your money, your property, your freedom, and your body. You don't need better leaders. You need less powerful institutions. That's how you prevent this from ever happening again.

Freedom of speech, individual rights, private property, individual ownership, competition, good faith debate, small government, minimal taxes, limited regulation, and free markets (the opposite of the crony capitalism we now suffer under), these are the checks and balances that bullet-proof a society against the soulless charlatans that fail upwards into positions of power in bloated government institutions and against the parasitic fraudsters that seek to attach themselves to the government's teat.

Yes, we need a Great Reset. Just not the subscription-based version that the World Economic Forum imagined.

Richard S.

17th October 2021, 09:36

This is for our future, our lives, our livelihood.

Take heed , WE are the lions, WE are the ones that CAN affect the outcome.

My heart cries for the outcome, my heart is stricken in pain for us all.

d-NmvDzUsdM

THIS MADNESS MUST STOP!

Eric J (Viking)

17th October 2021, 09:45

Excellent info here about the death jab:

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/244043852_354504029797385_6846210683563791556_n.pdf/vaccinereport.pdf?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=0cab14&_nc_ohc=9TUmi0RAHJAAX9kE6rx&_nc_ht=cdn.fbsbx.com&oh=dc2e58a71cab7a10da39b8ece1db4f6c&oe=616D7EC8&dl=1

https://projectavalon.net/vaccinereport.pdf

Bill Ryan

8th November 2021, 09:08

Published two days ago:

https://americanthinker.com/blog/2021/11/when_will_the_cdc_correct_its_covid_death_counts_as_italy_just_did.html

When will the CDC correct its COVID death counts, as Italy just did?

Summit News [Paul Joseph Watson] caught a fascinating story out of Italy: the Italian Higher Institute of Health decided it had miscounted COVID deaths. Instead of looking at people who died with COVID, as it once did, it looked only at people who died from COVID — leading to a 97% decrease in Italy's COVID death count. So far, the CDC shows no signs of following suit.

According to Summit News (https://summit.news/2021/11/04/italian-institute-of-health-drastically-reduces-its-official-covid-death-toll-number/):
The Italian Higher Institute of Health has drastically reduced the country's official COVID death toll number by over 97 per cent after changing the definition of a fatality to someone who died from COVID rather than with COVID.

Italian newspaper Il Tempo (https://www.iltempo.it/attualita/2021/10/21/news/rapporto-iss-morti-covid-malattie-patologie-come-influenza-pandemia-disastro-mortalita-bechis-29134543/) reports that the Institute has revised downward the number of people who have died from COVID rather than with COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000.
"Yes, you read that right. Turns out 97.1% of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid," writes (https://dailysceptic.org/2021/11/03/italian-higher-institute-of-health-adjusts-number-of-deaths-due-to-covid-alone-since-february-2020-downwards-from-over-130000-to-under-4000/) Toby Young.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/ssl-intgr-net/tags/7_124_9.gifOf the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.
"All the other Italians who lost their lives had from between one and five pre-existing diseases. Of those aged over 67 who died, 7% had more than three co-morbidities, and 18% at least two," writes Young.
"According to the Institute, 65.8% of Italians who died after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension (high blood pressure), 23.5% had dementia, 29.3% had diabetes, and 24.8% atrial fibrillation. Add to that, 17.4% had lung problems, 16.3% had had cancer in the last five years and 15.7% suffered from previous heart failures."
There's more interesting material here (https://summit.news/2021/11/04/italian-institute-of-health-drastically-reduces-its-official-covid-death-toll-number/), for the article discusses the ethics of overcounting to induce panic.

Reading between the lines, the problem in Italy was that the socialized medicine system was unable to cope with an influx of patients during a bad flu season. (And it was a bad flu season.)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/ssl-intgr-net/tags/7_74_19.gifThe actual data match closely what those who are not panicking have observed in America. As with every flu season, there are unlucky young (and youngish) people who die from the flu. Overall, though, the ones who die are either very elderly or have comorbidities of the type described in the quoted material above.

In America, however, counting COVID deaths is more of an art than it is a science (and that's not even getting into the way the government incentivized hospitals to count COVID deaths). You can see here (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf) the CDC's instructions.

A February 2021 article (https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/how-are-covid-19-deaths-counted-it-s-complicated) at the American Association of Medical College's website assures readers that no one is really overcounting in America: "There's no evidence of orchestrated inflation, but parsing the role that the disease plays in some deaths is not always easy for doctors — nor is the process clear to the public."

The article then discusses the fact that deaths from COVID are confusing because COVID creates a lot of "clinical complications." However — and this is where the article starts tying in with what we know to be true:
The disease's brutal impact on people with other medical conditions — such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart ailments — can make COVID-19 one of several contributors to a death, says Sally Aiken, MD, chief medical examiner of Spokane County, Washington. Aiken has seen cases where elderly people who were in advanced decline due to Alzheimer's disease and atrial fibrillation contracted COVID-19 and soon died.
In other words, COVID hastens death but doesn't necessarily cause it. Moreover (and, again, this matters), when it comes to death certificates:
Part I and II of a death certificate ask what caused a death and what other factors contributed to it. If COVID-19 appears among the causes and contributors, CDC guidance counts that (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/08/05/) as a COVID-19-related death.
Part I asks for the "immediate cause" of death, followed by any "conditions that led to the immediate cause," the CDC explains in guidelines for certifying COVID-19 fatalities (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf). For example: In some COVID-19 cases, the immediate cause is an affliction that arose from the disease, such as pneumonia, while COVID-19 gets listed under that as an underlying condition that led to death. In other words, COVID-19 caused the pneumonia.
Alaska's policy is a good yardstick for what's going on:
The Alaska Department of Health and Social Services explains on its website (http://dhss.alaska.gov/dph/Epi/id/Pages/COVID-19/deathcounts.aspx) why the disease is cited if it played any role at all:
"Whether COVID-19 shortened a life by 15 years or 15 minutes; whether COVID-19 is an underlying or contributing condition, the virus was in circulation, infected an Alaskan, and hastened their death."
Parse your way through all of this, and it becomes clear that COVID, because it is a new and highly adaptable coronavirus, hastened the deaths of those with one foot in the grave and one foot on a banana peel by increasing their vulnerability to the things that were already killing them. This is sad, for every minute, day, or week spent with a loved one matters. Additionally, the extreme lockdowns consigned so many to heartbreakingly lonely deaths.

However, if you do as the Italian government did and strip away age and comorbidities from the death count, COVID is just another flu for most people. The economy does not need to stop; people do not need to be locked up; the disease is treatable; and mass vaccination mandates are unnecessary, ineffective, and totalitarian.

waves

8th November 2021, 15:11

And I'm starting to have serious suspicions about what we have been trained to dismiss and accept casually as 'the flu' all these years.

It's easy to recognize now that every year of 'the flu shot' has been a Year One experiment of a new, untested, not enough time to target to any new season specific 'variant' ' concoction.... unless they created and injected it the year before.

I suspect we would find that these 'flu shots' have been a long running human experimentation in silent genocide too - either immediate or the implantation of technologies for future triggering.

https://i.postimg.cc/C55GNhDk/avalon-signature.jpg

DaveToo

8th November 2021, 17:23

Richard S.

15th November 2021, 11:12

Found this interesting tidbit:

rmsgEdR3PYE

:(

gord

15th November 2021, 14:33

Found this interesting tidbit:

rmsgEdR3PYE

:(

This was shown to be a hoax in June:
https://hoaxeye.com/2021/06/30/an-early-warning-cartoon-1930/

DaveToo

15th November 2021, 17:41

Found this interesting tidbit:

rmsgEdR3PYE

:(

This was shown to be a hoax in June:
https://hoaxeye.com/2021/06/30/an-early-warning-cartoon-1930/

Yes it's certainly not authentic but well done nevertheless. :)
For me the interesting part is who posted the video.

It's good ol' Dimitri Khalezov from 9/11 fame.

Sue (Ayt)

17th November 2021, 18:43

Not sure if this sad story was posted before or not.

MY DAD’S STORY – C*VID DIDN’T KILL HIM
*disclaimer — I am not a medical professional and don’t claim to be. I am simply sharing our story and the events we saw play out before our eyes.

First of all, I want everyone who reads this story to know that in all things we as a family believe God is sovereign. While we do believe my dad should have walked out of that hospital if he had received proper treatment, we also believe that the Lord could have healed him if he so desired, outside of any medicine. We find comfort in knowing that, and truly believe the Lord allowed us to see the plan of the enemy to help others, save lives, which in turn can save souls for eternal glory. This blog post is going to get long, so I’m sorry for that, but the Lord unveiled everything to us in His perfect timing, and each part is so critical to understand. So please read it all even if you watch the information at a later date. *below is a picture of us four girls with my mom and dad.

http://lirp.cdn-website.com/c9d2c0d2/dms3rep/multi/opt/Pic+1-1920w.jpeg

Second of all, and just as important, I am writing this blog post for EVERYONE, as we do not want to add to the narrative of us vs. them. This is not about vaxxinations, but yet it will be made about that. My dad was not vaxxinated, and we wouldn't have done it any other way even now, and if you want to put your hope and trust in a vaxxine and think this could have been avoided if we had done so, then that is your opinion. But, I have had hundreds of messages saying they or someone they knew was fully vaxxinated and yet still got covid, was hospitalized, or died. We are hoping to help EVERYONE. We don't care what personal decision you have made. We love you and want everyone to hear our story of what we went through in case you are in our shoes one day. Even if you disagree now, my prayer is that this information will be in the back of your mind if you need it.

Read the rest at the link (https://www.prvbsgirl2.com/my-dads-story-c-vid-didnt-kill-him)

Tintin

19th November 2021, 08:52

This is a really excellent summary and statistical analysis featuring the usual suspect conflations which we are all now very familiar with.

Duration: approx 25mins

1461324793597341697

6umArFc-fdc

Summary:

In this lecture I talk about our ongoing analysis of the latest data published by the Office for Nat Statistics on mortality by vaccine status. The reason this data is incredibly important is because it potentially provides us with the simplest and most objective way to determine the overall risk-benefit of the Covid vaccines, namely the comparison of all-cause mortality between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

What I will show you is that there are so many inconsistencies and missing information in the data – as is the case for most studies into covid vaccine effectiveness - that few conclusions can be drawn other than that it provides no real evidence that the benefits outweigh the risks.

But before I present these results I provide some background and context for thw work we have been doing on Covid stats

Agape

19th November 2021, 12:36

Brigantia

19th November 2021, 15:07

Austria going under full lockdown from Monday and compulsory CoV 19 vaccinations from February:

Austria to go into full lockdown as Covid cases surge (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59343650)

I suspect this is a desperate move in reaction to the rebellion that the Austrian government is facing from their police and military that I posted about here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110697-A-World-Pushing-Back-Against-CV19-Lockdown-The-Protests-The-Revolts-The-Non-Compliance&p=1463958&viewfull=1#post1463958) yesterday; copied below.

They can't enforce a lockdown on the unjabbed, so they're imposing it on everyone.

Edit to add - good luck to them on imposing forced medical procedures on the populace - Austria, of all places.

***********

This is hopeful news about Austria's draconian lockdown. This is a French news source that I've not come across before so I can't vouch for it, Infodujour (https://infodujour.fr/politique/54068-lautriche-se-souleve-contre-la-dictature-sanitaire).

"Austria rises against health dictatorship

Police and military refuse to control health passes in the name of "freedom and human dignity." They will join a large demonstration against compulsory confinement on November 20, 2021 in Vienna.

Just days after Austrian Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg decided to confine unvaccinated people, politicians and unions call for a vast uprising against this unique freedom-killing measure.

The leader of the Freedom Party (FPÖ) Herbert Kickl, called for a "mega-demonstration" on November 20 in Vienna.

Shortly thereafter, Austrian Armed Forces Union (FGÖ) president Manfred Haidinger followed suit and joined in in a letter published on 14 November. He intends to "defend fundamental rights and freedoms". The FGÖ specifies that "everyone" is authorized to demonstrate, even in the event of confinement!

The monitoring obligation imposed by Home Secretary Karl Nehammer has already been rejected by the police union. In addition, the Union of Austrian Armed Forces announces that they will participate in this large gathering in Vienna.

The panicking government

This is a resounding slap in the face for the government which, according to Austrian media, is showing more and more panic.

The chairman of the Social Democratic Trade Unions (FSG) and the Police Union, Hermann Greylinger, left no doubt in an interview that the police feel unable to carry out such checks, according to the weekly Wochenblick.

Manfred Haidinger (FGÖ) adds in his letter: “We hereby clarify that participation in assemblies is a particularly protected legal right and that it is also taken into account in the draft ordinance currently available. Participation and travel throughout Austria is permitted." However, unvaccinated people are advised to travel by private transport.

The letter finally recalls that "the ban on a meeting planned by citizens as well as the ban on a gathering of political parties have been declared illegal" by the Vienna Administrative Court."

Agape

19th November 2021, 15:44

I am just getting bad feel out of these “news”, well news it is and know I’m not the only one. Heard from some friends in the Czech Republic back in August saying the atmosphere is weird but no one can exactly put finger on it.
It seemed to be pacifying back in August though, now it’s coming back with vengeance.

Not in contact but my intuition after what’s happened with Austria is that it’s all little “cold n dark”. Like the fear is back ..
fear that took grip on couple generations before us.
Fear of Nazi takeover in 1939, then communists in 1948.
The “loyal citizen” under oath to do as obliged to do, perhaps reporting on each other already ?
Obliged not to help those without mask, vaccination and boosters.

If it’s the government who imposes this as “law” many people turn stupid after some time or if it lasts too long. They take natural immunity and resistance to zero levels,
people like babies, turn numb and helpless against it.

It seems rather unlikely that Austria would have “one of the lowest vaccination rates” in the EU. 2/3rds of citizens is not that “low”. Austria has always been clean and orderly. The distances in EU are rather small compared to India or the US.

Everything there is tightly interconnected and coordinated.

If this all happened say around 2000, people would panic more in my opinion and they’d be more active about it.

After 20 years subduction with computers, cell phones and internet media, pampered with choicy delicacies from all around the globe, the best fashion shops and comfort of material abundance getting them under oath wasn’t that difficult it seems.
Of course “they had to work for it”, work overtime in last ten years and what I know of friends. Just work with no foreseeable way out, pay the insurances, pay the taxes, pay back to the system holding them prisoners.

I bet they censor social media too nowadays or watching very close, each other’s backs.

When a sign of opposition is automatically interpreted as sign of revolt, any kind of democracy is on the verge of extinction.

And they are not alone, the world is watching, following these developments,
eventually the tide recedes and what comes next:

either another monster wave of controls
or broken waves of consciousness creating bigger resentment and chaos.

If the “snippets of Covid RNA” are essentially everywhere,
why injecting with more of it.

Afraid I’m cross posting from another thread even, luckily did not post this to “extreme measures in Australia”.

🍵

Journeyman

19th November 2021, 16:16

Rainbowheart

19th November 2021, 18:09

https://t.me/c/1293747145/124474

video from Germany,
on the streets against Covid-Dictatorship
and blown away by water

Brigantia

19th November 2021, 20:23

DaveToo

19th November 2021, 23:36

Austria going under full lockdown from Monday and compulsory CoV 19 vaccinations from February:

... Full national lockdown to be imposed in Austria from Monday, for maximum 20 days ( they say).
There will be legal requirement to get vaccinated from February 1, 2022.

Czechia, Germany, Netherlands and Slovakia likewise announced partial lockdowns and restriction access for the unvaccinated.

Hungary has counted record 11 289 new daily cases

and Russia announced record of 1254 death , 3rd day in row.

😒

Sounds serious, no doubts the rest of EU will follow the same drill adding more of compulsory booster shots.

But is this going to prevent “the 5th wave”?

Is there any proof Covid 19 does not spread among the already vaccinated equally ?

OK let's put on our thinking caps and analyze the following graphs really carefully.

I am presenting two sets of graphs; the first set in this post and the second set in my next post.

The data that is being plotted is from official world health sources (for what it's worth).

In each of the first set of graphs I have deliberately frozen the time to a particular date
for each country when the last wave of cases was basically over with the vaxxes starting up.

So let's examine carefully what we see.
For each country we may see 1-3 waves of cases in addition to the start of the 'vaccine' rollout.
Remember these initial waves occurred when there was maximum fear mongering about the deadly virus.
They also occurred when almost EVERYONE belonged to the dreaded, dirty, terrorist group of NON-VACCINATED people.
During this time when few could boast as being vaccinated, we see something incredible.

First we see waves of Covid-19 cases spontaneously begin, reach a peak and then spontaneously begin to decline until there are virtually no cases!
Were miracles occurring in each of these countries?
How could it have possibly happened?

Rub your eyes and look again closely.

VACCINES weren’t saving the day, yet in each country wave after wave, incredibly,
case numbers dropped like a stone!!!
And case numbers dropped irrespective of lock downs.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words. These pictures are worth a million words!

DaveToo

19th November 2021, 23:39

Now let's look at the second set of graphs.

Here we see the vax campaign in full swing.
Percent double-vaxxed range from 22-77% with most at 50% or higher.

One would think that with such high vax rates they would deliver a crushing blow to any
possible new wave.

After all, previous to the vaxxes, case numbers could take care of themselves, with no medical intervention.

Strangely, we see the exact opposite effect!
In almost every one of these countries we see Covid-19 case numbers exploding to their highest numbers!

Vaccines and the booster shots will have no impact on these waves. Period.

So we must ask ourselves:
1. What is the point of getting vaccinated?
The vaxxes haven't stopped infection, instead they have actually made matters worse!

2. What is the point of implementing vaxx passports (from a health perspective) when the vaxxed are just as infectious as the unvaxxed?

Agape

20th November 2021, 07:38

DaveToo: thanks for posting those graphs. Since this is so timely and on topic,
I need to pick on this question straight away.

I found this video of French microbiologist who is Nobel price laureate some time ago and as I was once aspiring student of biology, microbiology and medicine in my youth and a student for life as it comes,
I have to say that his opinion completely resonates with mine.

The point is not that “vaccination is wrong”, the point is we should not have started vaccinating before the epidemics is dealt with and over.
Inserting more viral material to the already existing sea of viral material only satiates the particular RNA strand soup and fuels mutability.

It’s adding fuel to the fire while we do not have developed well working anti-viral treatment so far , the best of them work for some people while others do equally well with oregano oil and vitamins once they get infected and symptomatic.
In short we do not have target treatment available

but [on earth] , vaccines are NOT A TREATMENT.

If someone has had TBC recently, you don’t give them TBC vaccine as precaution or treatment, they require prolonged treatment to get rid of TBC which is particularly difficult to get rid of but we don’t say the patient are out of TBC till they are and do not decline treatment to them !

Professor Luc Montagnier, French virologist and Nobel price winner on vaccinations creating new variants:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5e3Xa_PlPU

I think this video summarized the message very well and it’s all about the logic.

Now decisions taken by politicians, technocrats or leaders of pharma industries who jumped straight to the idea of vaccination as a cure to the problem ,
people who understand technical or political logic far better than I do but know very little about bio-logic or their cells works from starters miss that logic to the point.

Even by going back to what has happened in Wuhan at the beginning points out there are unknowns in the game where it concerns the origin of the virus and how it behaves , for what reason did it kill so many people in short time - it was winter when the epidemics started - how did it get out to all continents and countries in such a fast time and high transmission rate , almost unheard of speed in my opinion etc.

I don’t like to sound like a disaster but I don’t think that vaccination is the right answer to the problem, at this time.

If dissemination of virus is unavoidable and while millions of people proved to have natural immunity, cases should have been treated as required.

Wanting to spare ourselves the trouble” and get over the disaster fast or easy we are instead co-producing ourselves more suffering.

And it being global problem at this point there is no “individual salvation” available until someone develops target treatment.

But perhaps it is all about politics (?)🙏🌟🙏

Big bad psy-ops ?

Yes why Austria and the rest of well fed civilized world are getting the most cases.

I dare to say I know why.

But should I say no one will appreciate that kind of response.

Goes back to the fatty pork and other animal sources fats, believe me or not.

Check high cholesterol rates in populations worldwide for last decades but those are only very small markers.
I was in Europe for almost ten years between 2005 and 2016 and very close to the IKEM ( Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4) because of my mum who was both medical professional and in and out patient.
So I know the state of health in the society and how it evolved and not everyone disclose it or are in medical records but they are sufferers,
estimated 60% are overweight, 60-80% suffer from metabolic diseases of many kinds,
number of respiratory diseases among children and young people in cities increased from 30% to 45% in last 15 years and so forth.
Talking of real people /patients in circulation , not artificial numbers of “passed tests”. Talking of people who require daily medication , sometimes expensive medication to live their everyday, usually discretely and for years.
Hospital care turned costly , people are being sent home 3 days after complicated surgeries unless in acute state to save those costs, lack of beds etc.

Medical personnel running to other countries for being underplayed.

Doctors spending hours everyday filling papers for insurance companies.

People paying more and more for their medicines.

It’s not regional or limited to one country, it is a wide spread problem dealt with “under table”.

Coronavirus spreads through chain of predators and prey in animal kingdom binding to specific proteins and lipids,
if people’s bodies are fully satiates with those,
aren’t we a “yummy host”?

🙏

Afraid to say I can’t find the original video message of Prof Luc Montagnier immediately, the search is flooded with disputes and controversial statements already but will try to find it later. Thx for patience 🙏

Agape

20th November 2021, 10:19

Austria going under full lockdown from Monday and compulsory CoV 19 vaccinations from February:

Austria to go into full lockdown as Covid cases surge (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59343650)

Full national lockdown to be imposed in Austria from Monday, for maximum 20 days ( they say).
There will be legal requirement to get vaccinated from February 1, 2022.

Czechia, Germany, Netherlands and Slovakia likewise announced partial lockdowns and restriction access for the unvaccinated.

Hungary has counted record 11 289 new daily cases

and Russia announced record of 1254 death , 3rd day in row.

😒

Sounds serious, no doubts the rest of EU will follow the same drill adding more of compulsory booster shots.

But is this going to prevent “the 5th wave”?

Is there any proof Covid 19 does not spread among the already vaccinated equally ?

Are the governments acting “on faith”?

Namaste 🙏

Does booster buzz rhyme
with Bastet under bus
the best Booz

or is at all about “loving kindness and compassion”.

👁

I wonder if there's significance in Austria leading the way in the implementation of an authoritarian approach? For many, it will bring about obvious comparisons with the 30's and the period up to and after the Anschluss.

If this entire exercise is a massive false flag, in that existing national governments and power structures are going to play the villain, create the chaos and then our 'saviours' step in with the Ordo they planned all the time, Austria could be the perfect country to pick.

There may be something to it but I’m not a politologist and those who know do not say.
One thing I’ve recalled from the memory on the Velvet Revolution that started in Prague, followed by the great fall of the infamous Berlin war and spunk the biggest avalanche of freedom and transition to democracy in Europe in 1989 ( I was 16 back then) and from what my parents knew on deeper inside,
the “revolution” as it seemed to outside world and transition of power were planned years and years ahead, with utmost cautions and help of western intelligence agencies. It would have never ever happened without their help or solely “by people’s power” as shown in media outlets.

From intel perspective though the whole operation was considered “frail” still many years after and there was awareness of the risk that the operation could “flip” and people - especially the middle and older generation- would reject the idea of freedom because capitalism would be too costly and complicated to them and for being quite fixed on their comfort zones and food habits. Comfort zones that included free education and healthcare, state payed pensions for every worker including mothers who never worked etc. Of course the currency rates could never compare back then so those people learned to be satisfied with “middle way approach to consumption”. :)

From my perspective, the operation was worth every risk ..
we were the first to get out of the shadow.
Right in the year 1989/90 our school team attended young conference in The Hague UN quarters and I’ve breathed my first air of freedom.
Truly, I never wanted to return under the shadowy cover we seemed to live in.

4 years later I flew to India, on my own, to study with almost no means and experienced still greater freedom, spiritual and secular and it takes us all a lifetime to understand the value of freedom to our lives.
I’ve happened to study in Tibetan monastery and lived here within the exile community for many years and there is so little I can say or do about the situation of Tibetans in modern China without compromising the truth and “their truth”.

But this hit me right to the nose, 2 days old news:

Austrian city swears in first communist mayor (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/austrian-city-swears-in-first-ever-communist-mayor/a-59849044)

I don’t know much about it but from simple Wiki source, the comm party of Austria seems to be one of worlds oldest communist parties , established as German-Austrian comm party in 1918.
Everyone else “followed”. The Nazi party was considered the elite , far above the commies and had far bigger outreach and powers in their hands well before the end of WWII.

I am sure you all know about it from your side of matters. Now, common underlying factor to the recent Covid 19 pandemics and all the above is militarization of power.
Of course no communists can win or flip the situation in EU or the US nowadays though they have influential hands in Northern Europe,
countries like Finland, Sweden and Norway keep them in bay but they always look for help and inspiration to the East , to Russia and China , not surprisingly.

On the other hand, “nationalistic parties” with military power have better chance to stand global pressures of today because everyone is militarizing heavily.

Deescalation of the global power conflict/s would lead to optimal solutions for all,
in my best and only opinion but so far,
we can’t see it happen.

In sum, “it’s a new world (ahead) if you can take it”. If we can take it. Without killing each other and the rest.

🙏🌟🙏

Sorry if I said something stupid but the lunar eclipse last night was powerful though partial.

Purely speculative and hypothetical question since this is about Covid 19 begs, are people who have been infected with Covid 19 and/or vaccinated against it going to be more “combat ready”?
More aggressive or less aggressive , after some time , in matter of years ?

Does anyone know now ?

Are they going to be more obedient, better fighters ?

I doubt that today’s governments would do anything to destroy their people’s gene pool and human power.

It’s definitely readying us for something or trying to.

//

DaveToo

20th November 2021, 20:13

Agape

21st November 2021, 04:04

Well I wish that at least 50% of people started to think with reason at this point and before it’s too late , whether they’ve been vaccinated or not instead flying like blind bats straight to the honey pot trap.

At this point, they’ve been essentially offered creation of prison state by their noble governments , all with green passes and never ending chain of vaccinations ahead to guide them to better future.

I’ve noticed there’s been protests this weekend in all major cities in Europe and “riots” but that’s absolutely insufficient and not right. Breaking cars and bikes and burning shops won’t help.
There needs to be organized, outspoken, well reasoned movement against the current Covid policies , let the smart leaders come out and talk to people without fear and without facemasks.

Anyone so dumbed to step out without “the mask” and breathe little bit of chilly air that you breathed all your life , for a little bit a flue risk are hypocrites.

If they don’t want to breathe and just keep dying in their safe mansions instead they are not any sort of inspiration and leadership for people.

Why locking self in as an example of hypocrisy?

For the knack-knacks of global web stricken by delusional paranoia I’m nowhere close to Europe, I’m in northern India since April 2019 now and can’t move from the spot because I was human trafficked from Uruguay /South America to Finland in 2018 and offered re-education and arranged marriage.

I am pure and spiritual being with long history of education in my life and no one has ever suffered by me.

I will never consent to any dirty treatment or a step towards one, with more disrespect to my body , speech and mind.

I was born pure soul and will leave as such.

If I could make it this far , alone and against power of the sickos I hope you can stand up for yourself people, at this time and free your souls from the slavery to ignorance and discrimination .

Bill posted all about these protests in another thread in the same section. See what happens today but fearing its insufficient

🙏🕊🕊🕊

Tintin

7th December 2021, 14:06

[my title - TQ]: Statistical anomalies and miscategorisation/misclassification of vaccine efficacy based on all-cause mortality analysis

Hugely important 8 minute segment from this interview where Norman Fenton goes into the data analysis and discovers some alarming inconsistencies.

Norman Fenton explains the results of a new report that analyses the latest ONS data on mortality of vaccinated v unvaccinated.

Jxkb2yhdLiA

Also in the Avalon Library as both mp4 (https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Covid-19_Vaccines/Norman_Fenton_interviewed_by_Maajid_Nawaz_LBC_Radio_4_Dec_2021_Anomalies_in_vaccination_statistics_% 2B_mis-classification.mp4) and mp3 (https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Covid-19_Vaccines/Norman_Fenton_interviewed_by_Maajid_Nawaz_LBC_Radio_4_Dec_2021_Anomalies_in_vaccination_statistics_% 2B_mis-classification.mp3) files.

norman

10th December 2021, 18:11

norman

10th December 2021, 19:03

The advocate approach.

https://t.me/right_on_radio/5069

But I think it's even more clever and complicated than that, too.

I think even the saline solutions are varied, with some having other strange ingredients, all tracked back thorough the NHS database as an information feedback loop.

They probably are so evil that they figured, "hey if we're killing them anyway, let's do some useful science while we're at it".

jaybee

10th December 2021, 20:37

Operation Mind Control - The OMICRON Trigger

https://www.brighteon.com/51edb184-98b5-4214-b58a-22545b495a29

you can skip the first 15 mins if you are on the fly.

Omicron is not the name of a virus, it's a command, probably embedded in some people as far back as the 80s or 90s.

And anyway, you DO have to wonder why they suddenly decided to use such a big fancy word for a variant.

O....M....G

thanks for posting this video - it's Next Level - I don't automatically accept it as 100% true but I have a horrible feeling it could be... logically and intuitively - because of what's going on right now...

just watched it and I'm kind of reeling as I'm trying to absorb the implications - if I thought we were in serious trouble before this goes deeper - and frankly could explain why so many world leaders and people in key positions are helping the forces of evil to destroy us - - - the man being interviewed by Mike Adams, James Martinez lifts the lid of what could be the most hideous plot ever - I'm reeling at the implications - I don't know if I can put it in a nutshell and I will have to go through it again - but it's about the people not being who we think they are and that they have probably been cruelly traumatized as children and corrupted then the 'host' is taken over by an 'alter'... we speak about puppets but this puts a deeper slant on that - - - - literal possession -

he uses Barak Obama as an example in the part around 36 minutes - and that section (35:25) begins with Mike asking if he, Martinez thinks that members of Congress have been 'programmed' and he says yes for sure...

funnily enough something I said about technology in another thread earlier is addressed in the final third of the interview - about Cold Fusion and how the technology exists to do just about anything that would be good for mankind - but it is being held back - in favour of technology that enslaves -

at some point they talk about the mind being the battlefield of the 21st century - and the invisible war is happening - after many decades of preparation - maybe generations of preparation we are now in the middle of the major Shock and Awe strategic attack as the war against us intensifies - (that last bit about shock and awe were my words)

norman

21st December 2021, 12:32

This is a 13 minute video about the data/statistics fiddling.

It's from the Covid Revealed series producers website so it will probably be time limited. It's claimed to be available at eatwellmovewellthinkwell dot com but I looked for it and couldn't find it there (yet).

https://vrevealed.com/c19/numbers-all-lies

Gwin Ru

27th January 2022, 13:11

German Health Minister Admits 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated' Narrative Was A Load Of Crap, Blames 'Software' Error (http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62841)

By: ChrisMenahan
Jan. 26, 2022

The German government has admitted that the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative they used to oppress purebloods was based off a "software" error which incorrectly told them 90% of new covid cases were among the unvaccinated.

In fact, in most cases "they didn't even know who was vaccinated and who was not," the National Pulse reports.

Federal Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach, the top health official in Germany whose position is equivalent to the CDC director in America, claimed last week that "it was a mistake" and "was not done on purpose in order to largely blame the unvaccinated for the pandemic."

From The National Pulse, "Oppressive COVID Measures for the Unvaccinated Were Based on 'Software' Error, Claims German Minister" (https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/01/24/oppressive-covid-measures-for-the-unvaccinated-were-based-on-software-error-claims-german-minister/):

The "pandemic of the unvaccinated" was caused by a computer glitch. That was the conclusion (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUlPhK3ZG4Q) of the Health Minister of Germany Karl Lauterbach, after months of vilifying the unvaccinated in the nation's second largest city, Hamburg.

In November 2021, news outlets reported on the increasing "incident numbers" in the city -- where the figure grew from 111.6 infected people (https://www.shz.de/regionales/hamburg/Corona-Inzidenz-in-Hamburg-steigt-immer-weiter-aktueller-Wert-bei-141-6-id34245442.html) per 100,000 to 160 (https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/coronavirus/634-neue-Corona-Faelle-in-Hamburg-Inzidenz-springt-ueber-160,coronazahlen1450.html) per 100,000 in a span of few of days. By the end of November, that number shot up from 209.2 (https://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/article235190174/Corona-Inzidenz-steigt-in-Hamburg-mit-209-2-auf-Hoechststand.html) to a record of 223.3 (https://www.sueddeutsche.de/gesundheit/gesundheit-hamburg-459-corona-neuinfektionen-in-hamburg-inzidenz-bei-223-2-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-211123-99-110112).

The ostensibly drastic increases have been used to legitimize new COVID policy measures (https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/coronavirus/Corona-Hamburg-weitet-2G-auf-Einzelhandel-aus,corona9380.html) in the city. First, 2G (vaccinated or recovered) status limitation was announced in order to enter shops, restaurants, and clubs. Social contact limitation was mandated for the unvaccinated. After the order, Mayor Peter Tschentscher, claimed (https://fink.hamburg/2021/11/2g-regel-in-hamburg-ausgeweitet/) to observe an increase in vaccination numbers, and implied it was the only way out of the pandemic.

Now, an investigation from the Sueddeutscher Zeitung and Welt newspapers has found (https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/coronavirus/Inzidenz-in-Hamburg-Impfstatus-der-Infizierten-oft-unklar,coronazahlen1530.html) that the numbers in Hamburg's Social Services departments were drastically skewed and, in most cases, they didn't even know who was vaccinated and who was not. This, however, did not stop them classifying everyone with an unknown status as unvaccinated. Indeed, by the end of November, a whopping 70 percent of the positive cases had unknown status.

In the second week of November, the Mayor of Hamburg held a press conference and incorrectly claimed that 90 percent of all new infections were amongst the unvaccinated. In addition, he alleged the 7-day infection average for the unvaccinated was at 605 per 100,000 and just 22 in 100,000 for the vaccinated.

Furthermore, the Welt newspaper received the following answer regarding the classifications from Hamburg's Senate:

"...The categorization (used in Hamburg) matches [...] the one used nationwide…"
Until this weekend, the data on how the classifications are made and how the final numbers are "calculated" have not been made public. The mayor claimed (https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/news/falsche-impfstatistik-in-hamburg-tschentscher-bedauert-verunsicherungen-li.201604) by the end of December that the reason for the misclassifications were caused by deploying "different IT Systems", where each system used different classifier.

On January 17th, Health Minister Karl Lauterbach had the following to say: (https://twitter.com/argonerd/status/1484853098506039297)

"...with the situation in Hamburg... I can claim without a doubt, that the problem was in the automatic classifier of the software. The problem is solved now... and it was a mistake and was not done on purpose in order to largely blame the unvaccinated for the pandemic..." Full article: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62841

---------------------------------------------------------------

... an interesting little psychological gem embedded in there:

"pureblood"

... what's the likelihood of not associating that label with the "pure blue bloodlines" of the so-called "elite"...

Try a more accurate "untainted blood" and check if it doesn't entice one to associate it with the Red Cross tainted blood scandal... ?

Related:

Dr. Viviane Brunet on black-eyed babies (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113668-Vaccination-Injuries-On-Record-for-Covid19&p=1478718&viewfull=1#post1478718) 03:15

DaveToo

27th January 2022, 23:59

Richard S.

28th January 2022, 11:42

DaveToo

28th January 2022, 20:44

German Health Minister Admits 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated' Narrative Was A Load Of Crap, Blames 'Software' Error (http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62841)

The German government has admitted that the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative they used to oppress purebloods was based off a "software" error which incorrectly told them 90% of new covid cases were among the unvaccinated.

In fact, in most cases "they didn't even know who was vaccinated and who was not," the National Pulse reports.

Yeah right.

And I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you...

Sorry Dave, I want to make a small point.

The forum is most elegant when it presents information and ideas, it goes the other way when comments like this are made.

I think that if someone has something to say, you can't just bluntly dump on a post.
If one doesn't think that what is presented is accurate, then one should back it up with useful information and present another side to present another viewpoint.
Then a useful discussion can be had in order to sort out what is correct and what is not.

Not directed at Davetoo, mentioned in order to have this forum go in the right direction.

I don't want to offend anyone, just illustrate a point.

Thanks Richard.
I agree in general with what you are saying.

I only make these types of posts when I see something so pathetic, so unbelievable
that it begs reproach.

It would be like Pfizer coming out in a year or two saying that due to a technical glitch in
their systems they had some quality control issues in a few batches of their vaccines
and they apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused.

Added:

In fact I would go the opposite route.

The hardships that the government 'error' caused
to the German non-jabbed were so egregious
that the onus should be on the government to prove they
made a software error rather than simply make a statement
about it.

Furthermore, financial compensation to all non-jabbed should be forthcoming as a result of their admitted 'error'.

waves

28th January 2022, 22:20

Thanks Richard.
I agree in general with what you are saying.

I only make these types of posts when I see something so pathetic, so unbelievable
that it begs reproach.

It would be like Pfizer coming out in a year or two saying that due to a technical glitch in
their systems they had some quality control issues in a few batches of their vaccines
and they apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused.

I read what ChrisMenahan clearly quoted the Health Minister as saying as this exact backpedaling and his article title his sarcasm about the lame 'admission' blame as a 'load of crap'.

On January 17th, Health Minister Karl Lauterbach had the following to say:

"...with the situation in Hamburg... I can claim without a doubt, that the problem was in the automatic classifier of the software. The problem is solved now... and it was a mistake and was not done on purpose in order to largely blame the unvaccinated for the pandemic..."

Blastolabs

10th February 2022, 03:01

Sorry Dave, I want to make a small point.

I could be wrong but I am fairly certain that Dave directed his "Yea right" at the German government not at the user who shared the story?

Back on topic

The covid-19 numbers provided by the Colorado government continue to show the rate of cases, hospitalization, and death from covid-19 to be higher in the unvaccinated.

This is the opposite of what many other countries seem to be showing so I decided to investigate closer.

Turns out that the state changed their definition of vaccinated to mean "anyone who has received all recommended vaccine dose over 2 weeks ago.

Which is a misleading way to say we count people who are vaccinated as unvaccinated unless they have had 3 of the shots.

----- Timeline Shift Detected -------

While I was writing the above text I went to the states covid website to check on their wording and to my surprise their definition of the word vaccinated change AGAIN, yet this time they made it a bit more straightforward.

Where it used to say "Vaccinated" the site now reads "vaccinated with a third dose (booster)

That is a LOT more accurate.

It is great to see even a subtle shift towards honesty, and seeing so many school districts suddenly dropping mask mandates is also encouraging.

onawah

23rd February 2022, 06:13

CDC Caught Hiding Troves of Data: Not Publishing Critical Hospitalization, Booster, and Virus Data
68,258 views 2/22/22
18K
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
749K subscribers
------------------
Resources:

🔵 Sekur (promo code: Roman)

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

🔵 CDC article:

https://ept.ms/3JKuMaq

🔵 Scotland

https://ept.ms/3HckZYU

🔵 CDC Mask Guidance:

https://ept.ms/34TXvuN

https://ept.ms/36ApUGH

🔵 Speech Standards:

https://ept.ms/3sbqJ0Z

https://ept.ms/3LQCuSd

🔵 AAP study:

https://ept.ms/3IdxrsV

wcgppoM5X5s