Biowarfare Labs: Fort Detrick, Etc....

[Gwin Ru]

In light of the article below, Sue Arrigo's recounts of her meetings with Busch jr., Cheney, etc. (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110345-Did-anyone-seem-to-catch-Covid-19-in-October--December-last-year&p=1353445&viewfull=1#post1353445), are beginning to hold water very tightly, along with the Cs' revelations on the current situation (https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/session-21-march-2020.48488/), such as:
A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".
So is it any wonder if China is starting to look a bit deeper into biolabs such as Fort Detrick:


MK ULTRA and the Mind-Blowing History of Deep-State Controlled Fort Detrick (https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/mk-ultra-and-the-mind-blowing-history-of-deep-state-controlled-fort-detrick/)

By Ceng Jing

https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/FRN-1-150x150.jpgBy Guest Author (https://www.fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)
Last updated May 13, 2020


https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/fort-detrick-750x430.jpg

FREDERICK, MD - AUGUST 01: A sign at the Veterans Gate at Fort Detrick Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases is shown August 1, 2008 in Frederick, Maryland. Earlier this week Fort Detrick employee Bruce Ivins, a former researcher at the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, committed suicide after learning investigators were going to charge him with the 2001 anthrax attack. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Chinese state-controlled media starts to examine Fort Detrick claims by way of this compelling Op-Ed
– J. Flores, editor

By Ceng Jing for CGTN (https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-05-12/The-mind-blowing-history-at-Fort-Detrick-Qr1cLbK0dW/index.html) –

Declassified documents reviewed by CGTN showed the premises being investigated under the program ranged from the bizarre to the extremes of science fiction: Drugs that would “cause mental confusion;” “provide a maximum of amnesia;” “produce pure euphoria with no subsequent let-down;” “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men;” and many others.
Since the Trump administration declared national emergency in mid-march over the rapid spread of COVID-19, the task of developing a vaccine has fallen on the U.S. Army’s top virus research lab in Fort Detrick, located in suburban Maryland some 50 miles outside of Washington, D.C..

Over the past decades, leading researches on a wide range of viruses and bacteria were conducted inside the sprawling complex. Its state-of-the-art facilities also store some of the most dangerous toxins known to mankind, including Ebola, anthrax and the SARS coronavirus.

The obscure army base came under the spotlight in 2008 after one of its scientists was suspected to have perpetrated the 2001 anthrax attack, where several letters containing the deadly germ was mailed to American media and government offices.

Last year, one of the most prominent high-security labs inside the campus was shut down by health authorities due to safety violations. Besides a few incidents here and there, Fort Detrick seems like an ordinary place for modern medical science. Dialing back to history a little further, however, a period of purely freakish history begins to emerge.

After World War II, Fort Detrick became a site of horrifying scientific experiments conducted under a top-secret CIA quest to control the human mind, known as Project MK Ultra. After more than 20 years, the project ended in abysmal failure and led to an unknown number of deaths, including a scientist who participated in the project, and at least hundreds of American and Canadian victims subjected to mental and physical torture. The experiments not only violated international law, but also the agency’s own charter which forbids domestic activity.

Project MK Ultra was brought to life by the godfather of America’s intelligence empire – CIA Director Allen Dulles, whose ever-fiery rhetoric about Soviet threat helped him prop up an omnipotent national security apparatus that would come to define American politics. In 1953, after capturing American pilots who admitted to deploying anthrax during the Korean War, Dulles began touting theories that they had been brainwashed by then communists of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. To ensure national security, he argued, the U.S. must devise its own brainwashing program.

Dulles’ claim turned out to be based on nothing more than pure Cold War fantasy as a report he later commissioned rejected the communist brainwashing claims. Yet, the cunning spymaster Dulles who was known to have actively rescued several top Nazi officials against the will of his own government, continued the program for a far more nefarious reason.

As explained by David Talbot in his book The Devil’s Chessboard, many spies recruited in the early days of the Cold War were sketchy, undependable characters motivated by inner vulnerabilities such as greed, lust or revenge. Meanwhile, the agency was looking for ways to rule out these psychological variables by creating human machines that would act on command, even against his own conscience.


https://news.cgtn.com/news/3251444e3251444d3063444f35597a4e796b444f31457a6333566d54/img/c2d54b5c0b4c42a29d60d4d6d4daa3ab/c2d54b5c0b4c42a29d60d4d6d4daa3ab.jpeg
March 19, 2020, laboratory scientist Andrea Luquette cultures coronavirus to prepare for testing at U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command at Fort Detrick. /AP

https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/mk-ultra-and-the-mind-blowing-history-of-deep-state-controlled-fort-detrick/

In official terms, the main goal of the program was “research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior,” according to a declassified memo produced by the CIA Inspector General. It quickly ballooned in scale, branching into 149 sub-projects involving at least 80 institutions including universities, hospitals, prisons and drug companies across the United States and Canada.

To master mind control, a cadre of rogue scientists freely tested extreme methods on humans that would land anyone in prison had it not been inside the parameters of Fort Dertrick. These include forced administration of psychoactive drugs, forced electroshocks, physical and sexual abuses, as well as a myriad of other torments all silently carried out behind the high walls of “national security.”

Dulles was especially keen on finding out if hallucinogens like LSD could induce selected individuals to carry out “acts of substantial sabotage or acts of violence, including murder,” recalled the agency’s top poisons expert Sidney Gottlieb who spearheaded the program.

Declassified documents reviewed by CGTN showed the premises being investigated under the program ranged from the bizarre to the extremes of science fiction: Drugs that would “cause mental confusion;” “provide a maximum of amnesia;” “produce pure euphoria with no subsequent let-down;” “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men;” and many others.

Throughout its two-decade lifespan, MK Ultra was executed in extreme secrecy as the agency had expected significant political backlash had it become public knowledge. It was so secretive, in fact, that only a few top agency officials were aware of its existence.

Unbeknownst to neither the White House nor Congress, people of the forgotten corner of America – the prisoners, prostitutes and the homeless – were picked off the streets as unwitting participants in the mad science at Fort Derrick: “People who could not fight back,” in the words of Gottlieb. However, the program also relied on people who could, including American soldiers and unsuspecting patients who inadvertently stumbled into MK Ultra-associated hospitals and clinics across North America.

In July 1954, airman Jimmy Shaver at the Lackland Air Force Base was accused of raping and killing a three-year-old girl in San Antonio. Throughout the incident, he was often reported to be in a “dazed” and “trance-like” state. While under arrest, Shaver also seemed to have lost a tremendous amount of his memory, including those involving his wife. Four years later, he was executed on his 33rd birthday. It wasn’t until later the public learned that Shaver, who had no previous criminal record, was one of the guinea pigs used by MK Ultra. The mind-control project had played a significant role in sending Shaver to the electric chair, according to The Intercept.

Others who survived the brutal experiments revealed the horrendous aftereffects of the CIA-sanctioned brainwashing. Linda McDonald, a 25-year-old mother of five young children, reported that she had essentially turned into an infant after going through the notorious Sleep Room experiments, which she was told would treat her non-existent acute schizophrenia. For 86 days, McDonald was in a coma induced by rounds of powerful narcotics and electroshocks that fried her brains 102 times.


https://news.cgtn.com/news/3251444e3251444d3063444f35597a4e796b444f31457a6333566d54/img/d9a05b41acc04333ac1946f21da9dbe1/d9a05b41acc04333ac1946f21da9dbe1.jpg
Former U.S. President Gerald Ford apologizing in 1975 to the family of Frank Olson, who died in 1953 after the CIA gave him a dose of LSD. /AP

“I had to be toilet trained,” McDonald said.

“I was a vegetable. I had no identity, no memory. I had never existed in the world before. Like a baby.”
Yet, of all the 180 doctors and researchers who took part in these illegal experiments, few had expressed any suspicion or remorse. The one who did turned up dead.

Frank Olson was a biochemist and father of three children who worked in the Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick. He was one of the MK Ultra scientists who regularly traveled between “black sites” in Europe to observe different human experiments. After a 1952 visit to the Camp King, a notorious CIA safe house in Germany, he was particularly shaken by the cruelty to which Soviet prisoners were subjected to, according to Talbot.

“He had a tough time after Germany … drugs, torture, brainwashing,” Olson’s former colleague at Detrick, researcher Norman Cournoyer was quoted as saying. By the time he returned from Germany, Olson had suffered a “moral crisis” and was ready to give up his science career to become a dentist, according to Olson’s family. Yet, before he could change his life, the scientist himself had unknowingly become one of many unwitting victims of MK Ultra.

A week before Thanksgiving, Olson was invited to a weekend retreat in a secluded CIA facility at Deep Creek Lake in Maryland. One night after dinner, Olson and other unsuspecting scientists were given LSD-laced drinks, after which he began to hallucinate wildly. The ordeal ended a week later, when he crashed through the 10th floor window at the Statler Hotel in Manhattan. The scientist’s death was hastily concluded by CIA officials as suicide. However, Olson’s children could hardly accept the “narrative” and began their own investigation into the tragic end of their father.

After decades back and forth with the U.S. government and investigation by Frank’s son Eric and Nils, including an exhumation autopsy, substantial evidence have weighted toward the possibility of the scientist’s murder. After examining Olson’s remains, Forensic pathologist James Starrs pointed out several key inconsistencies that contradicted with the official narrative suicide. Despite having landed on his back, the skull above Olson’s eye had cracked, suggesting a blunt force to the head prior to crashing through the window.
“The death of Frank Olson on 28 November 1953 was a murder, not a suicide,” Eric Olson declared. “This is not an LSD drug-experiment story, as it was represented in 1975. This is a biological warfare story. Frank Olson did not die because he was an experimental guinea pig who experienced a ‘bad trip.’ He died because of concern that he would divulge information concerning a highly classified CIA interrogation program in the early 1950s, and concerning the use of biological weapons by the United States in the Korean War.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Also, lest we forget, here is a reminder of the CIA marching orders:

A reminder:

CIA mind control morphed into psychiatry? (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/cia-mind-control-morphed-into-psychiatry/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Jul 11 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/cia-mind-control-morphed-into-psychiatry/), 2017

Here is a new introduction to a piece I wrote several years ago. Then I’ll reprint the piece.

The famous CIA mind-control program, MKULTRA, always used psychiatrists; often these professionals headed up projects; they carried out the bulk of the research. But what I’m talking about here is the “evolution” of MKULTRA into mainstream psychiatry that affects the lives of millions of people every day.

I’ve demonstrated, on a number of occasions, that not one of the 300 so-called official mental disorders has a lab test to back up the diagnosis. No defining lab test. No blood test, no saliva test, no brain scan, no genetic assay. All 300 “disorders” are described and defined by committees of psychiatrists—and their non-scientific decisions are published in the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.

Unfortunately, the treatments for every one of these arbitrary diagnoses are toxic drugs; drugs that addle the brain; drugs that reduce people to a state of abject dependence; drugs that make people think they’re insane; drugs that cause violent behavior; drugs that create life-threatening problems when patients try to withdraw from them quickly; drugs whose effects mimic the very descriptions of mental illness.

In other words, modern psychiatry, backed by drug makers, has an ideal formula for disabling populations.

So it’s more than interesting that the CIA has pursued a mind control program (MKULTRA) to achieve, in certain respects, the same objectives.

—end of introduction—now here is my piece on a forgotten CIA document:


Drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society.

Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.

The intention is there, in the record:

A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program.

The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955.

It states:
“A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:”
What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.

First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agency’s Office of Research and Development.

John Marks is the author of the groundbreaking 1979 book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, which helped expose MKULTRA. Marks told me a CIA representative informed him that the continuation of MKULTRA, after 1962, was carried out with a greater degree of secrecy, and he, Marks, would never see a scrap of paper about it.

I’m printing, below, the list of the 1955 intentions of the CIA regarding their own drug research. The range of those intentions is stunning.

Some of my comments gleaned from studying the list:
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications would eventually satisfy that requirement.

The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.

The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine is such a drug.)

The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.

The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?

The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
As you read the list yourself, you’ll see more implications/possibilities.

Here, from 1955, are the types of drugs the MKULTRA men at the CIA were looking for. The following statements are direct CIA quotes:
A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:
1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.

2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.

3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol.

4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.

5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.

6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.

7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called “brain-washing”.

8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.

9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.

10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.

11. Substances which will produce “pure” euphoria with no subsequent let-down.

12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.

13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.

14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.

15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.

16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.

17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a man to perform any physical activity whatsoever.
—end of quoted section from the 1955 CIA document—

At the end of this 1955 CIA document, the author [unnamed] makes these remarks:
“In practice, it has been possible to use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this [research] work. However, that part which involves human testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be handled by the ordinary contactors.”

“The proposed [human testing] facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity for the secure handling of such clinical testing in addition to the many advantages outlined in the project proposal. The security problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest completely upon the physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow [CIA] TSS/CD personnel to supervise the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and embody adequate safeguards.”
In other words, this was to be ultra-secret. No outside contractors at universities for the core of the experiments, which by the way could be carried forward for decades.

A secret in-house facility.

Over the years, more facilities could be created.

If you examine the full range of psychiatric drugs developed since 1955, you’ll see that a number of them fit the CIA’s agenda:
Speed-type chemicals to addle the brain over the long term, to treat so-called ADHD.

Anti-psychotic drugs [Haldol, Risperdal, etc.], AKA “major tranquilizers,” to render patients more and more dependent on others (and government) as they sink into profound disability and incur motor brain damage.

And of course, the SSRI antidepressants, like Prozac and Paxil and Zoloft, which produce extreme and debilitating highs and lows—and also push people over the edge into committing violence.
These drugs drag the whole society down into lower and lower levels of consciousness and action.

If that’s the goal of a very powerful and clandestine government agency… it’s succeeding.

In mainstream psychiatry.

Jon RappoportNow, there is nothing hindering them to transfer their research into doing the same thing via adjuvants in vaccines or gene editing human DNA via said vaccines... right?

Related:
(En Subs) - Nobel Prof. Montagnier : COVID-19 caused by a vaccine experiment gone bad - 2020.04.17 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=-a7nld57f2M&feature=emb_logo)

[Gwin Ru]

In Italy, opponent of lockdown thrown into psychiatric hospital

Voltaire Network | 9 May 2020
Deutsch (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209888.html) Español (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209870.html) français (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209863.html) italiano (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209873.html) Português (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209891.html) Türkçe (https://www.voltairenet.org/article209875.html)


https://www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH250/arton209869-5b270.jpg

In the Sicilian city of Ravanusa, 33-year-old Dario Musso drove down the street with a megaphone, wanting to wake up his fellow citizens to the cry of "The pandemic is not deadly! Come out, take off your masks! Open up the stores!"

All witnesses claim that he was perfectly sane, simply outraged.

He was arrested by the Carabinieri (one of Italy’s main law enforcement agencies) and sent to a psychiatric hospital, where he was bound to a bed for 4 days, drip fed and sedated.

The hospital refuses to give out any information.

According to Article 21 of the Italian Constitution:
"Everyone has the right to freely express his/her thoughts in speech, writing, and by other communication" and to Article 22:

"Nobody may be forcefully submitted to medical treatment except as regulated by law. That law may in no case violate the limits imposed by the respect for the human being".

[Gwin Ru]

I strongly recommend this vlog by Ole Dammegard which combines both an army of MKultraed people and an army of "vaccinated" soldiers to trigger the MSM orchestra into playing the measures currently implemented via the scamdemic alone:


gNLjZ6L8tU0

Thanks to Cardillac: Globalist-TV: Ole Dammegard's most important video ever (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110972-Globalist-TV-Ole-Dammegard-s-most-important-video-ever)

[spade]

Gwin, please be aware of spreading CCP propaganda from that news site - This whole CCP virus was concocted by the CCP and Billy Goates connection.

Yes Billy Goates, Fauxi and the CCP teamed up together to produce this bio-weapon all in Wuhan. CCP Team under Victor Dzau and a few others stole / sold / smuggled the Ft Detrick virus samples to China because it was shut down due to some outbreak and due to a ban on bio-weapon research.

They needed to continue their wickedness somewhere else in secret, thus the Wuhan plan was hatched. Yes, Billy Goates is completely behind this.

The proof is right here :

[Gwin Ru]

[...]
Victor Dzau and a few others stole / sold / smuggled the Ft Detrick virus samples to China because it was shut down due to some outbreak
[...]... your own words demonstrating said virus was researched at Fort Detrick where there was an outbreak... implying said virus and outbreak did not start in China but in the USA!

China ended up being the patsy in that scenario and, as Bill Ryan mentioned in his "Anglo-Saxon Mission (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?355-The-Anglo-Saxon-Mission)" video, China was slated for catching a cold, long ago....


See this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110345-Did-anyone-seem-to-catch-Covid-19-in-October--December-last-year&p=1355558&viewfull=1#post1355558)

[spade]

the virus had its basic non-weaponized origins in Ft Detrick yes - but the gain of function, weaponization, to Ace2 receptors in combination with bats and pangolins all happened in China. Without China and the CCP's complicit mandates, none of this would have happened. So Wuhan it is. The outbreak did not start in Ft Detrick because it was not weaponized there, it couldn't be spread like how it has from Wuhan.

The question should be to all who believe in propagandized finger pointing : Where was this virus WEAPONIZED and then RELEASED (intentionally / unintentionally) to the world? Answer : Wuhan, under Billy Goates' direction.

[shaberon]

The proof is right here :

There has never been any question whether there has been joint Chinese and American research going on.

The highlighted statement just says there are "international cooperation projects". In what way does that prove any specific details about the research or smuggling?

[spade]

Whether it was smuggled, bought, stolen, sanctioned, donated or given - this is all irrelevant. It ended up in China and was turned into BIO-WEAPON by gain of function. That's all we should be concerned about. The CCP and Billy the Goates should be trialed and held to account to the rest of the world for this satanic plague they've enacted upon the world.

[Gwin Ru]

Related:


Bats, Gene Editing and Bioweapons: Recent Darpa Experiments Raise Concerns Amid Coronavirus Outbreak (https://www.greanvillepost.com/2020/03/02/bats-gene-editing-and-bioweapons-recent-darpa-experiments-raise-concerns-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/)



Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110345-Did-anyone-seem-to-catch-Covid-19-in-October--December-last-year&p=1355558&viewfull=1#post1355558)

[spade]

The limited outbreak in the US (Darpa Vaping) is due to the lack of gain of function. Whatever the case, please look at who is at the very top of this. There are only only 5 names here right at the very top. Please refrain from using countries as a handle for all the cover-ups. This is a very simplistic thing that propaganda arms use, blame countries.

Countries do not fund bio-weapons research, yes they may use taxpayer's money to, but reality - Individuals allow / sanction the funding. Individuals such as (for search prevention purposes, names have been altered) :

- Billy the Goates
- Winnie the Flu
- Faucet
- Sorows
- Whackerfella

Bring these people to justice with hanging - you will solve 75% of the world's problems right now. The problem is we currently cannot prove anything. This Obummergate issue right now is just only the very tip of the iceberg. Remove Obummer and the shadow funders will still be around. It will need to be a deep deep purge, but if you take out the top eye of the pyramid, the entire depth of the swamp will scatter or splinter into small groups that have no or limited power. Whatever the case, Billy Boy Goates is right at the very top, possibly possessed by the darkscum. He needs to disappear permanently.

[Agape]

Kerry Cassidy has a Project Update on the matter that I find relevant and resonant,
confirming what we have suspected earlier.
It’s an advanced type of information so unless you’re seeing the big picture of things it may sound controversial and herself she’s afraid it may be taken down at some point.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6F-rU9N91s&feature=emb_title

🌟🌟🌟

[Gwin Ru]

[...]
Countries do not fund bio-weapons research, yes they may use taxpayer's money to, but reality - Individuals allow / sanction the funding. Individuals such as (for search prevention purposes, names have been altered) :

- Billy the Goates
- Winnie the Flu
- Faucet
- Sorows
- Whackerfella
[...]
You maybe right, in part, spade; see this post/thread: Who Owns the US Congress, Really? (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106374-Who-Owns-the-US-Congress-Really)

... which I suspect is also true of most "Western" countries and wonderfully summarized in this quote (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110507-Covid19-Don-t-trust-the-statistics--or-the-science-re-the-tests-the-cause-of-the-sickness-&p=1356030&viewfull=1#post1356030):

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
- Upton Sinclair

[Agape]

Here is an excellent interview with Cyrus A Parsa that explains about all the rest.

I think he is more than correct. Joined couple good dots and links for me mostly by naming things that have not been named previously.
We are working through several AI systems here, human and non human.

Again, it’s an advanced information and number of people who can be explained this is limited. On the other hand: even simple people connect to the “live neural net” of humanity through their bodies and minds where information no matter how advanced can be shared in an instant.

No matter how tough certain type of oppression, regime or systematic abuse of human freedom seems it too can fall on instant by detaching from “the system”.
Most people living in any such known system do not realise who runs them.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUl-8QhDW0I


The horizon is rising ..


🙏
🌟
🕊

So rise.

[wegge]

Kerry Cassidy has a Project Update on the matter that I find relevant and resonant,
confirming what we have suspected earlier.
It’s an advanced type of information so unless you’re seeing the big picture of things it may sound controversial and herself she’s afraid it may be taken down at some point.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6F-rU9N91s&feature=emb_title

🌟🌟🌟

How would the nano quantum tunneling work? And once you go the cov you can never throw it out again?

I definitely think it’s possible that it’s linked up in some way with an AI, but if you try to come from that angle talking to a face mask wearer, good luck!

I thought we’re already under AI control since years, one that sits on the moon, what happened to that?

Are we backed by someone or are just our opponents backed by several malicious (and hyperadvanced) alien races and AI(s)?

Wouldn’t the AI borg hive mind anyways be just the manifestation of the groupthink that’s pandemic since ages?

Let’s assume someone of us gets accidentally hooked up, couldn’t we send messages back through the net or are we damned to be at the receiving end?

And what if „god“ is just waiting for a huge Deus ex machina moment?

[Elainie]

Kerry Cassidy has a Project Update on the matter that I find relevant and resonant,
confirming what we have suspected earlier.
It’s an advanced type of information so unless you’re seeing the big picture of things it may sound controversial and herself she’s afraid it may be taken down at some point.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6F-rU9N91s&feature=emb_title

🌟🌟🌟

How would the nano quantum tunneling work? And once you go the cov you can never throw it out again?

I definitely think it’s possible that it’s linked up in some way with an AI, but if you try to come from that angle talking to a face mask wearer, good luck!

I thought we’re already under AI control since years, one that sits on the moon, what happened to that?

Are we backed by someone or are just our opponents backed by several malicious (and hyperadvanced) alien races and AI(s)?

Wouldn’t the AI borg hive mind anyways be just the manifestation of the groupthink that’s pandemic since ages?

Let’s assume someone of us gets accidentally hooked up, couldn’t we send messages back through the net or are we damned to be at the receiving end?

And what if „god“ is just waiting for a huge Deus ex machina moment?


Has anyone else noticed people you have known for years being "assimilated"? My oldest daughter noticed this a few weeks ago, friends who were previosuly open minded now being completely assimilated in the "group think" and when challenged have AI automated responses. I went to my dentist on Thursday (long story but after wearing an N95 mask for an extended period of time out shopping, I developed a tooth abscess that might need surgery Monday if my oregano oil can't turn it around) anyhow right before my DDS injected me with ozone (he's a bio DDS and a prepper) he and I had a long discussion on this pandemic. He has also noticed the "assimilation" and thinks it's being done via tech AI. He also doesn't believe the "virus" is being spread via droplets or airborne.

[Gwin Ru]

In my perspective, many "parasites" have a strong tendency to blame everyone else than themselves so as to not attract attention to themselves... (Russia, Putin's missile, China, Iran, etc...)... so, the "ghosts," around each and everyone of us, pointing their astral fingers at AI or nano tech or Greys, Blues, etc... is of the same order and working hard at the parting of the human sea.

If readers do not know what I am referring to, please check this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99433-Jerry-Marzinsky-Mental-Health-Counselor-Voices-are-Entities-1-2&p=1322501&viewfull=1#post1322501) and the thread's OP (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99433-Jerry-Marzinsky-Mental-Health-Counselor-Voices-are-Entities-1-2) to get a better idea of these hidden influences. The ultimate goal of these "occult" influences is to destroy human individuals from where patsies of the like of Hitler, Bill Gates, Tony Fauci, etc. to implement their Agenda 21/30 in the name of their eugenics philosophy.

Until we have a way of indicting these 4D "ghosts," we remain limited to go after their 3D avatars/portals/PLFs (Programmed Life Forms) the difficulty being that when one of these avatars goes down, its "occupant(s)" just jump into another one. And, as Elainie pointed it out, these 4D entities are recruiting heavily to bring run-of-the-mill humans onto their side. Which, according to the Cs (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110970-Biowarfare-Labs-Fort-Detrick-Etc....&p=1355850&viewfull=1#post1355850), was the original purpose of that alleged vaccine...

[spade]

Yes Gwin totally agree, but if you kill their front man, it'll be years before they can bring in another new one, basically setting back their timelines by orders of magnitude.

It takes a massive amount of time to brainwash a generation of people patiently waiting for the previous awake ones to pass away, re-educating the younger ones to unquestioningly accept weaponized / laced vax and call it herd immunity only if 100% takes it. That's why getting rid of front men will really mess things up, like David slicing off the head of Goliath - setting back the Philistine timelines by large amounts. Giving our movements time to subdue their systems.

Thank God for movements such as Project Avalon to rediscover the agenda the nefarious agendas of the Molech / Baal controlled individuals who have set-up tentacled corrupt systems of mass control, that still need their front men to head. Of course their main goal is to head these systems with AI, of which they can then return to their masters to receive their due reward (of eternal karmic destruction).

7kQRa-YyO5o

[Agape]

How would the nano quantum tunneling work? And once you go the cov you can never throw it out again?

I definitely think it’s possible that it’s linked up in some way with an AI, but if you try to come from that angle talking to a face mask wearer, good luck!

I thought we’re already under AI control since years, one that sits on the moon, what happened to that?

Are we backed by someone or are just our opponents backed by several malicious (and hyperadvanced) alien races and AI(s)?

Wouldn’t the AI borg hive mind anyways be just the manifestation of the groupthink that’s pandemic since ages?

Let’s assume someone of us gets accidentally hooked up, couldn’t we send messages back through the net or are we damned to be at the receiving end?

And what if „god“ is just waiting for a huge Deus ex machina moment?



More information can be found in the 2 hour interview with Cyrus Parsa who is AI specialist so anyone asking for more extensive answers I’d recommend it.

I don’t “believe” things because someone claims them, ok. I also know the information is level above of what most of us can entertain in our daily lives.
Mind is “spacey” so no harm in keeping this information in the back of your mind ( since there is lots of free space there).

It would not give great sense to me either unless I’ve had specific and advanced ET Contact in this life and can agree with Cyrus there on many of his assessments.
He can just explain couple things better concerning the AIs.

There is no “one AI” operating here no matter where you looking from, each group, fleet, mothership use specific systems to communicate and gather information, some are more advanced than others.

Talking of very advanced technologies that aren’t quite fortunately available to humans quite yet but humans are now on the best trial of copying them. Somehow, anyhow.
As every other copied technical invention on this particular planet, the effort will fail : even after creating lots of damage.

Cyrus Parsa is worth listening to because he does not miss the point.

Ourselves we are advanced , ethical beings with origin in faraway space.

He does not have the precise information that I have on human origins but goes around the topic wisely.
My information was largely suppressed, belittled right in the first run, in the second run I was almost killed for it and technically speaking, I need to keep it as long as I can last till some better future.

Some of it can be found in the Witness section of this forum or google the “Bodhgaya Extraterrestrial Event Report”.


Unfortunately I was only permitted to say very little in open and even the best friends of mine proved so “jealous” of my information that no one helped the good thing forwards, but all efforts were made to portray me as a “victim”.
People in their utter egotism can be quite vile.

Back to the point and where it involves various AIs of non human origin, we are advanced ethical and spiritual beings in origin and certainly not meant to “go with everyone” in Space no matter what they have to offer.
We are capable and creative. We can be envied that much ability and creativity in thought and deed, in fact. We don’t need “them” a lot. We can do our own research and if we do we gain their little respect too.

The greys have been operating around this planet -but various groups of them and not to be confused with one another- for long time it seems.
If they’re responsible for running communist regimes such as the one of former Soviet Union, shared with China far to the corner of Korean Peninsula that’s a large affluence and territory they have taken.
It completely makes sense to me because I’ve seen how much can be people dumbed by the system. The system (AI) has operation levels, not dissimilar from many cult and religious organisations around the globe. It does not have “heart”.
Unlike in human dictatorships, empires and so forth the allegiance there is sworn to the system, not a physical person.
It “frees” large emotional space for many individuals allowing them to think they are “free” otherwise. There is no “human boss” in the equation. “God” is disallowed. The option of surpassing the system likewise. It’s a classical Big Brother scenario in action.

It’s surprisingly easy to get people under control of systems once and when most of their human idols and authorities show they’re corrupt.
It offers an illusion of personal freedoms. I think it’s what has and is happening in China at the moment and since the “fall of an empire” hundred years ago.

It’s happened elsewhere too. The ends are unfortunately very dark - changing human society to prison camps.

It does not seem to end there...

It may be the same intelligence responsible for making new sophisticated tools to control us including mass inoculations, controlled internet and world of tight laws in future.

If societies like that of China, Russia, the UK or North Korea don’t understand it now and don’t take their chance for human freedom they will stay behind because no one will be bothered with upgrading them and they will miss the principle even the moment of connecting themselves back to the Universe and where we started.


I would only repeat: it’s not “one type of AI” , it’s many of them.


The important thing there is, the dependence on those is psychological even if it can bear countless physical side effects and any individual with awareness can detach and help others to detach from it.


How does quantum nano tunnelling work ? Hard to say but similarly in principle like a woodworm I can imagine. The nucleic acid that is alien to our cell building mechanisms bores and burns tiny holes in the walls of our cells, membranes and tissues, occasionally bigger holes in places that allow other leaking of fluids and other metabolites and passage of next generations of invaders.

It’s not specific quality of Covid 19, it’s how many viruses and bacteria work that’s why recovery takes much longer than any system pays for and damages people sometimes for years.

Of course it does not “stay forever” and full recovery is possible but takes long time, with enhanced vitamin intake and continuous purification.


Sorry for not answering this in proper,
hope later times


🙏🌟🙏

[shaberon]

Whether it was smuggled, bought, stolen, sanctioned, donated or given - this is all irrelevant. It ended up in China and was turned into BIO-WEAPON by gain of function. That's all we should be concerned about. The CCP and Billy the Goates should be trialed and held to account to the rest of the world for this satanic plague they've enacted upon the world.


Why would I be concerned about that?

What shows that this is exactly what happened?

There are five years worth of records that would show virology work shared between Wuhan, Harvard, and UNC. But it does not lead to that conclusion. It is definitely related, so, it is impossible to deny that there is human tinkering with precursor coronaviruses. It just doesn't go that far. I hesitate to grip onto a single explanation without something more substantial.

I am certainly not in favor of the capitalist medical cartels to the extent that if someone were to skip the trial and lynch them, I would look the other way.

I believe it would be best if through this, it can be validated in a global-calamity-preventing-way that organics and herbal treatments are what it takes to make one forget about the Covid disease or even anything Ft. Detrick might be able to make on purpose. I would like it if we could show that was the main, basic treatment against the medical establishment as a whole. Blow it out like a candle.

Everything would still be about the same if I said no, this happened as a natural adaption of a regular coronavirus inside a human in New York. They failed to discover it. How could I be sure of knowing how some kind of plot worked, especially if part of how it worked is irrelevant? How would I get a Grand Jury to indict them? There is definitely major interest in suing the Chinese, and they would love it if you could prove it was weaponized in China without talking about how it may have been imported.

[Bo Atkinson]

My take on proactive resistance, with health and strength, even through old age, is the harmonious balance of etheric, (the cosmic-electrical aspects as yet little clarified and researched with a common terminology, but a subject matter which is gradually coming to the fore, in diverse research terminologies), and added to that, the emotional energies, (which are our primary driving energies whether these are used creatively in harmony with all life of if these are used parasitically or predatorily through destructiveness). This is a growing and effective approach for me.

To the extent that we can inherently live right, we build this combined balance between etheric, emotional, physical, and mental forces, and are not affected by deranged energies emitted by the perpetrators of electronic attacks, as I think this hits closer to the core, than to simply say AI. (For one thing it is arguably beyond artificial and intelligence both). I have been studying my own TI (targeted individual) experiences for 7 years now and gladly found a system with practices to catch up on etheric matters, having been previously absorbed only in other aspects of being targeted with their death squads, as was my fate. So let me add a little encouragement here, to others, so as not to fear and rather to keep up the active resistance.

[Agape]

Wuhan doctor says coronavirus is US weapons and explains why (https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-06-04/A-Wuhan-doctor-says-coronavirus-is-a-U-S-weapon-and-explains-why-R2SZ1ZwgkU/index.html)

China releases white paper on Covid 19, absolves itself from all global allegations (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.livemint.com/news/world/china-absolves-itself-of-all-covid-blames-in-whitepaper-says-virus-1st-noticed-on-dec-27/amp-11591516944185.html)


The newly released paper asserts among else that Covid 19 emerged through human-to-human transmission before it was detected and that animal- bats and pangolins to human transmission played insignificant role and can’t be confirmed as original source of the virus, among else.

I can’t locate the paper in itself but guess it’s all over the news.


Clearly it looks like they’re not going to hold a conference this year and cancelled the barbecue as well 😷

[fractal being]

U
Wuhan doctor says coronavirus is US weapons and explains why (https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-06-04/A-Wuhan-doctor-says-coronavirus-is-a-U-S-weapon-and-explains-why-R2SZ1ZwgkU/index.html)

China releases white paper on Covid 19, absolves itself from all global allegations (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.livemint.com/news/world/china-absolves-itself-of-all-covid-blames-in-whitepaper-says-virus-1st-noticed-on-dec-27/amp-11591516944185.html)


The newly released paper asserts among else that Covid 19 emerged through human-to-human transmission before it was detected and that animal- bats and pangolins to human transmission played insignificant role and can’t be confirmed as original source of the virus, among else.

I can’t locate the paper in itself but guess it’s all over the news.


Clearly it looks like they’re not going to hold a conference this year and cancelled the barbecue as well 😷

Agape you might not realise it but this is the singlemost important post that might shift the Covid1984 origns conversation on where it should actually be. I'll post the report on the covid19 thread ASAP. However the posts linked don't give it enough credit.

[Gwin Ru]

Check this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110916-PLANDEMIC-Part-1-Virologist-Dr-Judy-Mikovits-Speaks-Out&p=1359347&viewfull=1#post1359347) (the video is now banned from GooTube) [but now available at the Avalon library]

[Agape]

Here there is another research paper alluding to the same theory of the Covid 19 aka SARS-CoV-2 origin ,
published at the beginning of April

by joint effort of two independent expert teams

Rosanna Segreto, Department of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Austria

and Yuri Deigin, Youthereum Genetics Inc., Toronto ON

titled Is considering genetic manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 a conspiracy theory that must be censored (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340924249_Is_considering_a_genetic-manipulation_origin_for_SARS-CoV-2_a_conspiracy_theory_that_must_be_censored)


For abbreviated version of its content and context follow article in Wion of June 4:

Evidence suggests genetic manipulation of Covid 19 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/evidence-suggests-genetic-manipulation-in-covid-19-303189/amp)



Makes me think and what are they going to tell us this time . Starts reminding me of The Andromeda Strain (https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x27szz5) movie. .Or has it been hiding around since Roswell?

The Roswell UFO mystery re-examined ,Werner Herzog, The Wild Blue Yonder(2006)

check minute 09:50 seconds


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOPFRMnvgfE

The Wild Blue Yonder did not turn very famous as not easy to watch. Yet it too is a child of the Tree of Mahabodhi. Werner Herzog’s team was filming the “cancelled” Kalachakra ceremony in Bodhgaya in 2002,
the same time my Bodhgaya ET Event Report on human origins comes from.

The jolly atmosphere in Bodhgaya surrounding the ceremony and encircling holy Mt Kailash can be seen in his movie the The Wheel of Time (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UJZAb830qEc)



😷

[onawah]

From Organic Consumers Assoc email update today:
6/20/20
Why? https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/HjCGWqVai5jss5stSCRAXprtgNpMQgSY-2AZ2Zz6L2BG3rcz6kWg2WAVcVSxq5X4OwxO7y6Yiw4fag9hyKywZ35Aiue3M5BnEbUsaTyHPP9RsPuqW48iY32EfS-tNbxYkW0wkjBn2eu8h4YeZ4hfkaL9im-idY0rpvlyUC5g_W-wT9AV4dH4hUPYr8953ZwcLss=s0-d-e1-ft#https://www.organicconsumers.org/sites/default/files/styles/250x250/public/corona_virus_question_mark_250x250.png?itok=zVMUhOvT

"So far, most (not all) mainstream and progressive media outlets have toed the line on the origins of COVID-19 story. No genetic engineering. No lab escape.

Anyone who suggests otherwise is merely peddling conspiracy theories. But could the tide be slowly turning?

This week the Wall Street Journal, published an article that begins with this:

“New research has deepened, rather than dispelled, the mystery surrounding the origin of the coronavirus responsible for Covid-19. Bats, wildlife markets, possibly pangolins and perhaps laboratories may all have played some role, but the simple story of an animal in a market infected by a bat that then infected several human beings no longer looks credible.”

The Journal article refers to numerous studies, including one by Nikolai Petrovksy and colleagues at Flinders University in Australia who, the Journal reports, have found that SARS-CoV-2 has a higher affinity for human receptors than for any other animal species they tested, including pangolins and horseshoe bats.

“[Petrovsky] suggests that this could have happened if the virus was being cultured in human cells, adding that ‘We can’t exclude the possibility that this came from a laboratory experiment.’”

Why does it matter where the virus came from? Because as the news reports, including this one in 2016, reveal, safety measures at labs similar to the one in Wuhan are frighteningly lax. And the number of labs is growing.

According to a recent article in the New Yorker:

“Before 1990, there had been only two BSL-4 labs in the United States: one at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta, and another at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (U.S.A.M.R.I.I.D.), in Fort Detrick, Maryland. In the nineteen-nineties, three were added. In the first seven years after 9/11, the United States opened ten more. In a 2007 report, Keith Rhodes, then the chief technologist in the Government Accountability Office (G.A.O.)—the independent watchdog that conducts research for Congress—observed that there was ‘a major proliferation of high-containment BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs is taking place in the United States.’ Rhodes counted fifteen known American BSL-4 labs (including N.B.A.F. [National Bio and Agro-defense Facility]) but suggested that there could be others; the number of BSL-3 labs appeared to have increased even more. ‘No single federal agency knows how many such labs there are in the United States,’ Rhodes wrote, and ‘no one is responsible for determining the aggregate risks associated with the expansion of these high-containment labs.’ In theory, the Federal Select Agent Program keeps tabs, since any lab in possession of a substance on its list has to register; a 2017 report from the G.A.O. counted two hundred and seventy-six high-containment select-agent labs in the United States. But the actual number is almost certainly higher, because not every dangerous pathogen is on the federal list.”

The real question we should be asking ourselves now is this: What possible justification is there for allowing (and funding with taxpayer dollars) researchers to engineer viruses to make them lethal to humans?

Read ‘So Where Did the Virus Come From?'
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/so-where-did-virus-come?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday

Read 'The Risks of Building Too Many Bio Labs'
https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/the-risks-of-building-too-many-bio-labs

Read ‘SARS-CoV-2 Origin — Deadliest Cover-Up in Human History’
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/sars-cov-2-origin-deadliest-coverup-human-history
utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday

Read ‘Why COVID-19 Disproportionately Affects the Elderly’
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/why-covid-19-disproportionately-affects-elderly?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday

Read ‘Emails Reveal Chaos as Meatpacking Companies Fought Health Agencies Over COVID-19 Outbreaks in Their Plants’
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/emails-reveal-chaos-meatpacking-companies-fought-health-agencies-over-covid-19-outbreaks-their?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday

SIGN THE PETITION: Stop the Genetic Engineering of Viruses! Shut Down All Biowarfare Labs Now: https://advocacy.organicconsumers.org/page/18957/petition/1?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday "


******************************

Why do we allow the genetic engineering of viruses?
Organic Consumers Association
6/20/20
campaigns@organicconsumers.org
http://www.organicconsumers.org/news/so-where-did-virus-come?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=OB+665&utm_content=OB+665+Saturday

"Research into the origins of the new coronavirus raises questions about how it became so infectious in human beings

New research has deepened, rather than dispelled, the mystery surrounding the origin of the coronavirus responsible for Covid-19. Bats, wildlife markets, possibly pangolins and perhaps laboratories may all have played some role, but the simple story of an animal in a market infected by a bat that then infected several human beings no longer looks credible.

A study published in early May by scientists at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass., and at the University of British Columbia has uncovered an unusual feature of the virus’s recent development: It has evolved too slowly. The genomes of viruses sampled from cases during the SARS epidemic of 2002-2003 showed rapid evolutionary change during the early months of the epidemic, as the virus adapted to its new host, followed by much slower change later. By contrast, samples taken from recent cases of the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, have comparatively few genetic substitutions compared with an early case from December. "

See the May 29, 2020 article in The Wall Street Journal by Matt Ridley: https://www.wsj.com/articles/so-where-did-the-virus-come-from-11590756909

[onawah]

Cover-Up of SARS-CoV-2 Exposed
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 21, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/21/coronavirus-lab-origin.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20200621Z1&et_cid=DM573715&et_rid=899052829

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The mainstream media are still protecting the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotically transmitted virus originating in bats. Much of the evidence for this comes from Shi Zhengli, the chief Chinese researcher studying bat coronaviruses
While SARS-CoV-2 likely came from a bat, overwhelming evidence suggests it did not become infectious to humans through natural evolution
A recent article by Independent Science News editor Jonathan Latham presents several different lab origin hypotheses
Latham also exposes the fact that the Wuhan Institute of Virology failed to identify that a seven-year-old virus sample they have is the closest known precursor to SARS-CoV-2
Many who defend the all-natural zoonotic origin story justify their stance by saying there are no signs of genetic manipulation. However, there are several ways to manipulate a virus without leaving telltale markers
This closest-known relative was already in the genetic database under the name BtCoV/4991. However, when it was resequenced following the COVID-19 outbreak, they simply renamed that old virus, which has been on ice for seven years. Whether additional genetic manipulation was done to 4991 to create SARS-CoV-2 is unclear
Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist and a virologist, which is a great skillset to help us understand the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Latham reviews some really intriguing evidence in this interview. He’s also the editor of Independent Science News.

By and large, the mainstream media are still protecting the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotically transmitted virus originating in bats. Much of the evidence for this comes from Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the biosafety 4 laboratory in Wuhan, China.

As the leading Chinese bat coronavirus researcher, her career has been focused on studying bat coronaviruses for over a decade. In a recent article,1 Latham and Allison Wilson, Ph.D., dissect research showing this theory simply doesn’t hold water.

“Our article doesn't dispute that it came from a bat at some point, I think that is the strongest data, but what we do dispute is the mechanism by which it came from the bat,” Latham says.

Lab Origin Theory No. 1
Latham’s article lays out several different lab origin hypotheses. The simplest one is that researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology or another virology BSL-2 lab that's even closer to the wet market speculated to be the origin of SARS-CoV-2. In that process, one of them got infected and then passed it on to coworkers or family, either because they didn’t properly quarantine or didn’t realize they were infected.

This is not the most likely of hypotheses for the simple reason that few naturally occurring bat coronaviruses identified have the ability to bind to human ACE2 receptors, which is what allows them to infect human cells in the first place. In order for this theory to work, the virus would have to circulate among many people, evolving slightly with each pass.

Lab Origin Theory No. 2
Another theory is that the researchers were cloning a bat virus similar to SARS-CoV-2 in the lab in an effort to make a more infectious clone. Perhaps they placed the virus in monkey cells, humanized mice cells or human cells with an ACE-2 receptor expressed in them. A researcher may then have been accidentally infected.

“There have been lab escapes of viruses in which people fail to decontaminate samples and then they give the samples to someone else, or they throw them out with the trash, or some mishap arises,” Latham says.

“So, the virus is either identical to the one that was collected from the wild or very little altered by the lab, but then it escapes because there's some failure in the lab. That would be a second possibility.”

Lab Origin Theory No. 3
A third possibility is that they were collecting samples and looking at genetic sequences in order to find a virus they could then alter, giving it more interesting properties. Perhaps they found some with the spike protein that had a greater affinity for the ACE2 receptor. By combining it with another virus, they may have been able to create — through genetic engineering — a more infectious virus.

The reason for mixing and matching viruses in the lab in this way is to identify potential pandemic pathogens (PPP). Meaning, two wild viruses, if they come in contact with another, might mutate into something deadly to humans.

“For example, we will swap spike proteins and see if the viruses that we have circulating in bats, really all they need to do is evolve better spike protein and all of a sudden, they can become pandemic pathogens,” Latham says.Genetic Engineering Doesn’t Necessarily Leave Marks
Many who defend the all-natural zoonotic origin story justify their stance by saying there are no signs of genetic manipulation. Like several other scientists, Latham points out there are ways you can manipulate a virus without leaving telltale markers. He explains the basics of the genetic engineering process:

“The standard thing, historically, was you find a restriction site in two different viruses, or you may manufacture a restriction site. That gives you a cutting place in the genome … Let's say you start with virus A and you cut a bit out and you put that into virus B. Of course, you've got to remove the bit from virus B that it already has.

So, you're basically swapping things and you're using restriction enzymes, which are basically enzymes that cut DNA in specific places. That's kind of the old-fashioned way.

There are newer methods with PCR and so forth that are slightly more complicated. It means you're not restricted to restriction sites to do that. There are very simple cutting and pasting [methods], but it doesn't necessarily leave a scar or a mark. This is the really important point here.

There are also passaging experiments. Passaging experiments are when you take a virus — say, for example, you take a virus that originally came from a bat and you put that into monkey cells, or human cells … What you normally observe with that virus is that it doesn't work too well in those cells because it's not adapted to them. It's a bat virus, so it doesn't work too well.

But what virologists have learned to do is to, essentially as the viral infection is failing, take a little sample of what is inside the cell and put that into another cell. Then, when that infection builds up … you take another sample.

This is called passaging. It allows the virus to evolve into a more pathogenic form against the cells that you are now putting into. So, you're always putting into the same species of cell. You can also do this with whole organisms.”

The Most Likely Scenario
As noted by Latham, until the passaged virus has been genetically sequenced, there’s no telling exactly what it looks like, or how it might act. It’s fairly random in that sense. Latham explains:

“It may have recombined, it may have mutated; there's been a genetic change, but you don't know what it is until you research it, clone it and make a new infectious clone. And so, you have the possibility that what escaped from the lab is actually not known to the people in the lab. They don't actually know what it was that they evolved.

And, if they were doing those kinds of experiments, putting the live bat viruses into cells of different species — and historically we know that they were doing those kinds of experiments — then they could also develop a new virus.

You can also have a combination of those experiments. So, you can have researchers who passage recombined molecules, they did the cutting and pasting part, and then they put back the cut and pasted virus into novel cells like human cells, and then they passage back, and then you evolve an infectious clone in that way.”

In this way, you can create a virus with high affinity for human cells, even though it wasn’t infectious to humans in the beginning. One of the key features of SARS-CoV-2 is its spike protein has high affinity for the human ACE2 receptor. The question is, how did this affinity arise?

“One of the obvious answers to that question is that it was being passaged inside these human cells or that somebody cut and pasted a spike protein bound to these human receptors that they already knew worked particularly well.

So, my hypothesis is that either they were cutting and pasting, or they were passaging, or they were doing some combination of both, and then that basically led to somebody in the lab becoming infected through some kind of careless event,” Latham says.

Leaks Have Caused Other Global Pandemics
The wild H1N1 virus that caused the 1918 flu pandemic was extinct for decades. However, in 1977, there appears to have been a biosafety lab leak in China or Russia in which that virus escaped, causing a global pandemic.

“Essentially what happened is the virus went extinct and then a new version of the virus appeared in 1977 in China, and it was basically identical to one that had existed 20 years before … No one can explain how a virus could appear — it was basically identical — but had been somehow hidden.

There was a theory that it had been in the permafrost and somebody had dug up a person from the permafrost who had died with H1N1 flu, but that was the best theory people had until they realized that it probably came from a lab that was making a vaccine.”

The H1N1 virus was temperature sensitive, and one of the things you use when you're making vaccine is a temperature-sensitive virus — a partially disabled virus.

“Basically, there is no other explanation than that this came from a lab and that there were labs who had stored stocks of it, but no lab has really come forward and said, ‘It was us.’ So, this has been kind of deduced from sequence information from the location in which it appears and so forth, but it's widely accepted by virologists,” Latham says.

Naturally, the notion that a biosafety lab leak would be responsible for a lethal pandemic is an uncomfortable one, especially for virologists doing that kind of work. An outbreak of equine encephalitis in Venezuela has also been traced back to a laboratory leak. Then there’s the H1N1 swine flu pandemic of 2009. Latham says:

“There's a scientific paper by a friend of mine, Adrian Gibbs ... written with two other virologists. He's a famous virologist and he says, ‘This came from a vaccine. The swine flu is actually not readily accountable by the specific circulating viruses that happened to be in North American and European and South American pigs at that time.’

Basically you can't explain it by that method, but you can explain it perfectly well by the idea that there was a manufacturer who was making bits of H1N1, one from European sequences and North American sequences, and South American sequences, and stuck them all together to make a universal vaccine, and somehow they failed to inactivate it.

So, they gave it to pigs in Mexico and that became the swine flu, the second H1N1 pandemic, and that second pandemic killed probably close to 300,000 people. We have a whole series of examples of lab escapes of viruses, so when people treat the lab escape thesis as being somehow ridiculous or outrageous or improbable, to me it just demonstrates their ignorance of the history of virology.”

Latham also addresses suspicions that HIV AIDS came from a polio vaccine, so for more details, listen to the interview. This was described in the book “The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS,” by Edward Hooper, and reviewed in a British Medical Journal article that you can read for free.2

SIV from infected monkey kidney cells that were used to create polio vaccines and used on hundreds of thousands of Africans are also suspected of being the cause of certain cancers.

Safety Breaches at Wuhan Lab
Many safety breaches have been documented at biosafety labs around the world, including the Wuhan lab. Several were documented by U.S. Embassy officials who visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2018.

“I mean I think they're important data points but … we think it's more important that people from within China have raised questions about the bio security of this lab. Firstly, it's newly opened, so that's automatically a bit of a red flag. Secondly, there were violations cited by the internal overseeing agency in China of the kind of standards they would expect from a BSL facility.

They've been trying to set up the certification systems and so forth for their labs because they're trying to set up a whole network — a whole system of animal experiments and collection stations and so forth … So, they're setting up the certification schemes and they've already been cited, according to these reports, as having violations …

In the end, let me add something: One of the basics should be that you don't site these labs in the middle of a big city. So, we already have what I would say a violation to the basics. They should be in a desert or something like that, they should be in Antarctica, in remote areas.”

BSLs Promote High-Tech Solutions Rather Than Hygiene Basics
There can be no doubt that biosafety level 4 labs pose a tremendous threat to public health, seeing how they house the most dangerous pathogens in the world, and leaks are inevitable. The question is, are these risks worth it?

As noted by Latham, the existence of these laboratories drive the vaccine agenda while old-fashioned commonsense hygiene strategies such as hand-washing and protective gear fall by the wayside. The risks posed by these labs also fit right into the surveillance capitalism now getting a hard push through the roll-out of disease tracking and tracing mechanisms.

“An interesting thing happened the other day. Seventy-seven Nobel laureates, most of them molecular biologists, wrote a letter to the president protesting the cutting of the grants to the Wuhan lab that were emanating from the NIH. Well the man leading this effort [is] Richard Roberts. What is his scientific position?

He is on the board of directors of New England Biolabs, one of the biggest suppliers of molecular biology equipment. So, they're corralling together all these Nobel Prize winners to support all this molecular biology research that costs big bucks — hundreds of millions of dollars a year to do this kind of research, money that could be going to PPE and so forth.”

That money could also go to more basic strategies such as vitamin D supplements to build up the population’s immune system.

Cover-Up at Wuhan Institute of Virology Exposed
Latham and Wilson are also planning to write about what they believe is a cover-up at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The nearest living ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 is a viral sequence currently stored in the Wuhan lab. It’s said to have been kept frozen for the past seven years and nothing has been done with it.

This sequence came from bats living in a mine, and people who have worked in the mine have died of viral infections. In other words, they’ve had a strong reason to look into that virus sequence, and that one also happens to be the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2. Shi published one of the first viral sequences of SARS-CoV-2.

“Three papers came out in three days, all saying this is ‘The sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,’” Latham notes. Yet “her paper makes no reference to this longstanding sequence that they'd had in her lab. Zero reference. Instead, they say they've taken a sample from that freezer and they've sequenced it, and this is the nearest living relative.

But this obscures the fact that for seven years they'd had another virus, which basically came from the same tube … But it looks like when you go searching the DNA databases, it makes it look like this virus has just been with us since December.

It really hasn't, it's been sitting in that lab, supposedly unresearched. So, the question is, what were they doing with this viral sequence for seven years that may have killed three miners back in 2013?”

In a nutshell, SARS-CoV-2 is quite possibly not a new virus. A highly conserved close ancestor was already in the database under the name BtCoV/4991. It was already in the published literature. However, when the Wuhan Lab resequenced the mineshaft sample following the COVID-19 outbreak, they simply renamed that old virus that’s been on ice for seven years.

“Giving it a new name basically obscures the old history. They don't even acknowledge that it came from the same tube, which they now have been forced to acknowledge … It’s the same virus. The sequence identity between the two samples is 100%.

So, if there were one base pair different, you could maybe make a scientific argument that we should give them a different name, but there's no difference between them whatsoever. It's the same virus from the same tube, collected from the same place — the mine where the miners died … from a viral infection of pneumonia.”

Shi’s genetic sequencing paper basically pretends the 4991 sequence never existed. “They've forgotten all about it; that would be the interpretation of reading their paper,” Latham says. A second paper released within that three-day span identifies 4991 as the nearest living relative, and states that it comes from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The third sequence paper does a complicated phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, yet it too fails to mention that the nearest living relative is 4991 and held in the Wuhan lab.

“What's really interesting is that everyone who sequence [SARS-CoV-2] — there was a bunch of labs that sequenced the virus around the same time — they all would have searched the database and come up with this 4991 sequence … They all would have done that.

What you have to imagine is that they just get on the phone with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and say, ‘Oh, the virus broke out in your town just down the road from you, walking distance, and you are the keepers of the nearest known viral sequence. Have you had a lab accident?’ You can imagine dozens of labs phoning them up and say, ‘How do you handle a lab accident?’ …

What I'm offering is evidence of a cover-up, but we don't know exactly what they were covering up. They could have been covering up something a little different, but the very obvious thing to be covering up is simply that you are researching a virus that looks uncomfortably like SARS-CoV-2 …

We only have a partial sequence [of 4991]. We don't have the whole genome of this original sample. They only provided a sequence of 370 base pairs, but it is 98.7% identical to SARS-CoV-2 on nucleotides and the 370 base pairs.

This is considered the most conserved part of the genome, so it doesn't necessarily extrapolate to the whole thing. What is quite possible is that, that sample comes from something that is way closer than anything we've been told about.”

Public Health Rethink Is in Order
Even if 4991 isn’t a 100% match to SARS-CoV-2 (which sequencing of the whole genome would reveal), it could be close enough that you wouldn’t even need a whole lot of gain-of-function experiments to end up with a highly transmissible virus. According to Latham, “That's exactly the kind of thing that could have happened.”

In closing, as noted by Latham, the big picture question is, do we really want to be spending taxpayer money on all of these public health models that rely on biosafety/bioweapons research?

The justification for doing this kind of research on viruses is to prepare us for potentially devastating outbreaks, should the viruses evolve and mutate in the wild. Yet, that same research ends up being the source of our most dangerous outbreaks. As noted by Latham:

“These people have not managed to predict anything so far. What they've done is these incredibly dangerous experiments and then find out that the next virus comes from somewhere they didn't anticipate, or certainly didn't warn us about …

This research is not really predictive, but if enough virologists get together and say that this is how we predict the next pandemic, what is the government to do? If they all say, ‘That's how we should do it,’ then who's going to contradict them? …

I mean, you want to continue gainful employment, so why not push an agenda that's going to keep you employed, even though it doesn't serve the public good necessarily …

What [should] we spend our public health money on? Do we target these individual diseases and make New England Biolabs and the Gates Foundations investors rich, or do we invest in public health in a sense that benefits everybody — prevention and nutrition?

Also, the big issue too that we haven't really touched on is, why are we blaming the wildlife trade here? This is a really important question to ask because Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance, has been in all the media; he's been on Democracy Now!, the New York Times, Scientific American, Science Magazine, all these different outlets, basically ubiquitously blaming the wildlife trade, saying categorically it's not a lab escape.

Well, he is an interested party, right? His nonprofit is funding this research. The media cannot go and ask the person who's funding it whether it came from their lab or not. It's ridiculous. But that's what they're doing and they're treating us like idiots.”

As Latham points out, the reason some wild viruses emerge is because we’re destroying rainforest and building roads into remote areas. People end up catching the viruses because animals are fleeing the destruction of the forest.

So, why are we blaming the wildlife trade? If anything, we need to address the destruction of the animals’ native habitats. That, however, would be very bad for Daszak’s business because the EcoHealth Alliance is in partnership with the palm oil industry.

“We find that science — if you understand the science well enough — really helps you understand who's lying,” Latham says. “When you understand that part, you got a really strong anchor to base in analysis of what's really going on in the bigger picture.

If you can see that a very obvious thing — the possibility here is a lab escape —and then you've got one or a few people wandering around the media saying, ‘A lab escape is an impossibility, it never happened, there's no chance of it at all’ — you know that they're not speaking science, that they have some kind of ax to grind. And then you see who else repeats the message, who supports them and who doesn't and so forth.” "

+ Sources and References
1 Independent Science News June 2, 2020
2 BMJ. 2000 May 27; 320(7247): 1481.

oWpO9Dg768k

[Gwin Ru]

Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made (https://www.sott.net/previews/tipe/317396-Title?new_art=true#current_icon)

Pierre Lescaudron
Sott.net (https://www.sott.net/previews/tipe/317396-Title?new_art=true#current_icon)
Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:33 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574036/large/Covid_19_man_made.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574036/full/Covid_19_man_made.jpg)

The unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic left many unanswered, or unsatisfactorily answered, questions. Why were effective drugs banned while a hypothetical vaccine was promoted? Why the sudden concern of the authorities for "saving lives"? Why the same measures across dozen of countries? Why the imposition of lock-downs when detection and treatment worked better? Why was a virus whose fatality rate is comparable to a seasonal flu, hyped to such an extent? Is SARS-CoV-2 a natural virus, or was it created in a laboratory?

The present article aims to answer those questions and, more importantly, to decipher the true motives behind the global coronavirus show.

Authorities and Life


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574272/large/stay_home.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574272/full/stay_home.jpg)

"Stay home save lives"


All the measures taken by the authorities relative to the COVID-19 pandemic centered around one motive: "saving lives". This motive is in line with the very purpose of the authorities, whose mandate is to protect us, or so we've been led to believe.

That's the hallmark of progressive thinking; year after year - thanks to human rights, democracy, humanitarianism, humanism and technological progress - barbarity and death are becoming a thing of the past. We are now "kinder and gentler," as Steven Pinker puts it:
"Cruelty as entertainment, human sacrifice to indulge superstition, slavery as a labor-saving device, conquest as the mission statement of government, genocide as a means of acquiring real estate, torture and mutilation as routine punishment, the death penalty for misdemeanors and differences of opinion, assassination as the mechanism of political succession, rape as the spoils of war, pogroms as outlets for frustration, homicide as the major form of conflict resolution — all were unexceptionable features of life for most of human history. But, today, they are rare to nonexistent in the West, far less common elsewhere than they used to be, concealed when they do occur, and widely condemned when they are brought to light."

~ Steven Pinker, A History of Violence (https://newrepublic.com/article/77728/history-violence). The problem is; this idyllic interpretation doesn't stand up to hard, tangible facts. The table below lists conflicts of the 20th Century and their number of victims, and is extracted from David Berlinski's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Delusion) book, The Devil's Delusion. The original table is 3-pages long, so I reduced it to mention only those conflicts with 1 million+ casualties.

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/570660/large/total_death_XX_century.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/570660/full/total_death_XX_century.jpg)

20th Century conflicts with 1 million+ victims © Berlinski


Even with this limitation, the total number of deaths amounts to more than 177 million. In addition, Devil's Delusion was published in 2008, so it doesn't list the recent conflicts in countries like Iraq, Libya, Ukraine or Syria.

How do we reconcile the alleged progress with these millions of avoidable deaths? To maintain the illusion of "gentler and kinder" behavior, the authorities attempt to put a positive spin on wars, labeling them, "war for peace", "war for democracy", "war against communism", "war against terrorism", etc.

But these wars have nothing to do with the misleading slogans. They killed millions of innocent people, they were unjust, and often led to regimes worse than the ones they replaced. Do you remember Iraq's WMD (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/leadup-iraq-war-timeline/)s, 9/11 and Bin Laden conspiring from his remote Afghani cave, the attacks against Qaddafi and Assad while the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Qatar (two of the most regressive regimes in the world) are protected for decades, the snipers (https://consortiumnews.com/2019/04/22/the-buried-maidan-massacre-and-its-misrepresentation-by-the-west/) in Maidan, the bogus incident in the Gulf of Tonkin, the anthrax that was used to justify the first Iraq war, anthrax that actually came from Fort Detrick?

The 20th Century tells the story of millions of innocent people sacrificed by the authorities on the altar of greed, lies, propaganda and deception. The facts are here, they are stubborn, and they scream: "No, the authorities couldn't care less about saving lives."

The same applies to the humanitarian sphere. Hunger kills 9 million (https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/people-and-poverty/hunger-and-obesity/how-many-people-die-from-hunger-each-year) people every year. That's 30 times more (https://news.google.com/covid19/map?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en) than SARS-CoV-2 and its alleged 365,000 (https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=covid+death+world) deaths (the number of coronavirus deaths is being grossly exaggerated - we'll deal with this point further down). It would cost between $7 and $249 billion to eradicate hunger. Meanwhile, the U.S. has already thrown more than $6 trillion (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/15/coronavirus-economy-6-trillion/) at the coronavirus crisis. That is 24 times the highest estimate for the cost of eradicating hunger in the whole world.

The epidemiology sphere tells the same story. For decades, malaria has been killing about 500,000 (https://ourworldindata.org/malaria) people every year (mostly children) while cheap and effective drugs are available. Solving the malaria problem would cost about US$ 4 billion (https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/85/8/06-039529/en/) a year. In just 3 months, the US government has spent 1,500 times more on coronavirus than the cost of dealing with malaria.

In the same vein, every year the seasonal flu kills between 300,000 and 500,000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815659/) individuals without alarming the authorities whatsoever.

Obviously, the authorities don't give a damn about the millions dying every year because of malaria, hunger or the flu. So why this sudden concern about allegedly "saving lives"? What is the true motive?

Authorities and Control
While the concern of the authorities for "saving lives" is dubious at best, their thirst for control is obvious. The past years revealed a staggering increase in CCTVs (https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/08/30/1563159/0/en/Global-CCTV-Market-Forecast-2018-2022-Increase-in-the-IP-Surveillance-Market.html), speed-cameras, mass spying on citizens, tracking applications, access to personal phones and email data, increased use of subcutaneous microchips (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human)), biometric IDs, face-recognition technologies, endless airport "security" procedures, a ban on cash in the interest of financial tracking, etc. All these measures came with a proportional shrinking of personal liberties.

Surveillance is only part of the control agenda. Legal pressure is another aspect, through the proliferation of norms, regulations, treaties, laws, decrees, certifications and amendments enacted at local, state, federal and supranational levels, leading to the control of every details of our lives. The EU is infamous for having enacted some of the most absurd regulations (https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/669356/EU-ridiculous-rules-Britain-must-adhere-balloons-toasters-bananas-lightbulbs-pet-horses):
- a ban on 'energy-inefficient' hair dryers, toasters and kettles
- illegal for people to eat pet horses but they are still allowed to eat other types of horses
- children under 8 cannot blow up balloons
- ban on the sale of incandescent light bulbs because they were seen as not energy efficient enough
- Illegal to make Stilton cheese in the village of Stilton
- banned drink manufactures from claiming that water can prevent dehydration Such regulations defy common sense and clearly are not in the interest of the "greater good," which suggests that ultimately it's about control for the sake of control.

Hand in hand with the legal pressure comes an overbearing bureaucracy manifesting in a multiplication of agencies requiring mountains of paper to simply own a house, a car, a gun, or a business.

Increase in surveillance, regulation and bureaucracy are the symptoms of the same growing control exerted by the authorities, which leads to a sense of oppression among the masses, and, sooner or later, this oppression triggers rebellion.

The authorities are very aware of - and afraid of - insurgencies. Any popular movement that threatens their power will be stopped by infiltration, subversion, propaganda, attrition and, if necessary, by sheer violence and assassinations. This last point demonstrates that, despite their claimed concern for "saving lives", in order to keep their control the authorities are actually willing to do the contrary and sacrifice the lives of countless citizens.

Genuine popular uprisings have always been responded to with violence by authorities. From Ireland's Bloody Sunday (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Sunday_(1972)) - when British soldiers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_soldiers) shot 26 unarmed civilians during a protest march against internment without trial (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Demetrius) - to the USA where Martin Luther King's civil rights movement faced the long hot summer of 67 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights_movement) when police officers shot at black civilians and suspects indiscriminately, killing 43 people.

But that was decades ago, and since then authorities have greatly improved their methods of repression. That's why we have witnessed over the past decade the militarization of police forces, with helicopters, tanks, machine guns and snipers. The mission of police forces is to "serve and protect", not the citizens, but the interest of the authorities. And make no mistake, the interests of authorities are usually in direct conflict with the interests of the people.

But we don't have to go back decades to find examples of state violence. In France, the Yellow Vest movement has been going on for 18 months. It started with popular opposition to an extra tax (https://www.la-croix.com/Economie/France/taxes-carburants-coeur-conflit-gilets-jaunes-2018-11-26-1200985523) on fuel (fuel is already taxed at more than 60% (https://www.connaissancedesenergies.org/fiche-pedagogique/structuration-des-prix-de-l-essence-et-du-gazole-france) in France). Millions joined the marches and a majority of citizens support the movement. The authorities responded the usual way, with rubber bullets, tear gas, flash-bang grenades, batons, and water cannons. So far 24,000 (https://www.gj-magazine.com/gj/clementine-autain-evoque-24-000-blesses-parmi-les-gilets-jaunes/) Yellow Vest protesters have been injured, 24 lost one eye, 5 lost a hand, and 11 have died. 4,000 (https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/2019/11/08/un-millier-de-gilets-jaunes-condamnes-a-de-la-prison-ferme-depuis-le-debut-du-mouvement_1762173) were arrested, 3,000 of whom were prosecuted, and 1,000 of them received jail sentences.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573719/large/blesses_LBD2_01b82_ab350.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573719/full/blesses_LBD2_01b82_ab350.jpg)

Injuries amongst the Yellow Vests


This kind of hard-nosed state counterinsurgency tactic is, however, a risky approach because it can create heroes and martyrs and galvanize the people. A few genuine popular uprisings were successful, for example the counter-coup that brought Hugo Chavez back to power in 2002 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Revolution_Will_Not_Be_Televised_(film)). Physical violence only goes so far. Instead of controlling bodies, it's much more effective to control minds, because then you control the bodies indirectly. In this way, citizens can't even think of the idea of rebellion.

Controlling minds is the ultimate dream of the authorities. A mankind comprised of slaves, complacent, hanging on the every word of government, agreeing to everything, accepting even the unacceptable. Robots that have shed any remnant of true personality and independent thought or deed.

Dumbing Down the Population
The authorities have attempted and often succeeded to shape the human mind through various techniques. One way to control minds is through information (lies and narratives): overexposure to mainstream media - on paper and on screens - deep corruption of academia and research and, last but not least, the falling education standards combined with growing propaganda increasingly tailored towards the young.


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574133/large/these_6_corporations_control_9.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574133/full/these_6_corporations_control_9.jpg)

90% of US media is controlled by six companies


Chemicals are another way to dumb down the population. For example, through the fluoridation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation) of drinking water, which is known to lower (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2748634) IQ scores in children. In the same vein, there is an epidemic of autism (by 2040, it is estimated that 10% (https://books.google.fr/books?id=UF2lvVIV3CsC&pg=PT469&lpg=PT469&dq=autism+epidemics+2040&source=bl&ots=6MLt5-9WIx&sig=ACfU3U3x0X4QvhYqz4yCBf-Bys0ARNVoNA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQxK7olZPqAhWOHhQKHdF2CfEQ6AEwAnoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=autism%20epidemics%202040&f=false) of children will be born with autism) associated with vaccination (https://www.amazon.com/Inoculated-Science-Lost-Soul-Autism/dp/1945390964) campaigns. Lead is another culprit, causing 10% (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_poisoning) of intellectual disabilities, and its brain toxicity has been known for centuries. Despite that, lead is still found in tooth fillings, indoor plumbing, food, gasoline and water - like in Flint (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis), Michigan.

And let's not forget the boom in legal and illegal drugs, which can only have happened with the consent of the authorities. The so-called "wars on drugs" is a mere public relations campaign to maintain the illusion of good "authorities" and to eliminate traffickers who don't toe the authorities' line:
To an average American who witnesses the dismal spectacle of the narcotics traffic at the street level, it must seem inconceivable that the government could be implicated in the international drug trade. Unfortunately, American diplomats and CIA agents have been involved in the narcotics traffic at three levels:

(1) coincidental complicity by allying with groups actively engaged in the drug traffic;
(2) support of the traffic by covering up for known heroin traffickers and condoning their involvement;
(3) active engagement in the transport of opium and heroin.

~ Alfred McCoy, The politics of Heroin: CIA complicity in the Global Drug Trade Nevertheless, the population control methods listed above have limitations. Propaganda eventually collapses under the weight of its own contradictions, and chemical substances can usually be avoided or mitigated to a large extent.

So, for the authorities, the fundamental question remains: how to implement a deep and irreversible mind control of the population? While propaganda or chemicals can have significant influence on the human organism, there is something much more fundamental that is, today, within reach of the long arm of authorities: our own genetic code. Our mind and our body are to a very large extent the product of our DNA. If you can properly modify someone's genetic code, you can change the way they think 'at the source' so to speak. And one of the best ways to profoundly and durably modify human DNA is viruses.

The True Nature of Viruses

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574275/large/3e5e9ebe_d497_4d4f_b569_244e07.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574275/full/3e5e9ebe_d497_4d4f_b569_244e07.png)

The rubeola virus


Viruses are one of the oldest organisms, their presence attested to, at least, 550 MYA. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187962571730041X?via%3Dihub) They are also by far the most numerous organisms on our planet, with an estimated 10 (https://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=3775)31 viruses in the oceans alone. That's 10 trillion more than the estimated number of stars in the Universe (10 (https://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=3775)21).

Viruses are also, and by far, the most diverse organisms, with an estimated 100 million (https://www.virology.ws/2013/09/06/how-many-viruses-on-earth/) different types of viruses on Earth. For comparison, there are about 5,500 (https://www.virology.ws/2013/09/06/how-many-viruses-on-earth/) known mammalian species on our planet. Out of this estimated 100 million different types of viruses, only 200 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427559/) types (a mere 0.0002%) sometimes cause diseases in humans.

Despite this astounding seniority, diversity, sheer number and overall harmlessness, viruses have until recently been understood to have an exclusively pathogenic role: spreading disease, suffering and death - in part due to scientist Louis Pasteur, who fathered germ theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease) in the late 19th century, which limited germs (including viruses) to that role.

This misleading theory prevailed until the advent of genetic research, which today suggests that the truth about viruses might very well be almost the opposite of what Pasteur claimed:
"One of the most earth-shaking papers of this century was the publication of the human genome sequence. About half, possibly even two-thirds of the sequence are composed of more or less complete endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and related retroelements (REs) [...]. The origin of REs is being discussed as remnants of ancient retroviral germline infections that became evolutionarily fixed in the genome.

About 450,000 human ERV (HERV) elements constitute about 8% of the human genome consisting of hallmark retroviral elements like the gag, pol, env genes and flanking long terminal repeats (LTR) that act as promoters. Howard Temin, one of the discoverers of the reverse transcriptase, in 1985 already described endogenous retrovirus-like elements, which he estimated to about 10% of the human and mouse genome sequence.

The actual number is about 45% as estimated today. In some genes such as the Protein Kinase Inhibitor B (PKIB) gene we determined about 70% retrovirus-related sequences. Is there a limit? Could it have been 100%?"

~ Moelling K, 'Viruses and Evolution - Viruses First? A Personal Perspective (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433886/) ' Our DNA code is literally made of viral sequences. This prevalence of viral sequences in human DNA is staggering even when only known virus sequences are taken into account. This omnipresence is confirmed by the numerous copies of the same viral sequence found all over the human genome:
"[...] humans, given the vast proliferation of insertion sites involving those 30 to 50 families of viruses, and the 200 or so subgroups. If, for example, we look at just the HERV clone 4-1 variant of the HERV-E family that was studied by Sekigawa in relation to SLE, the human genome contained 85 copies of the virus at various integration sites within different chromosomes. "

~ Frank Ryan, Virolution (https://books.google.fr/books/about/Virolution.html?id=NSVVAQAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y) In addition, most viral sequences are integrated (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228468/) in our non-coding genes. Coding genes are like musicians who, instead of producing sound, produce proteins, which are the fundamental building-blocks of all life forms. Non-coding genes play an even more fundamental role; they are like a director controlling the musicians, modulating (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468922/) the expression of coding genes.

The numerous viral sequences found in our DNA are not a genetically neutral archaism; it is now proven that endogenous viruses have beneficial effects on the host:
"In 1996, Roy J Britten, of the California Institute of Technology, was able to list ten examples in which endogenous retroviral sequences helped regulate the expression of a useful gene. Seven of the ten examples were human."

~ Frank Ryan, Virolution (https://books.google.fr/books/about/Virolution.html?id=NSVVAQAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y) About the term "endogenous" used above: our ancestors were exposed to a new virus (exogenous = transmissible virus) and integrated the code of this virus into their very own DNA (endogenous = hereditary virus). In fact, not only do endogenous viruses have beneficial effects as shown by the quote above, but it seems that their presence is even necessary for life forms to exist:
"[...] when Corrado Spadafora, the Italian researcher who has produced such pioneering work in cancer research, applied an anti-reverse transcriptase drug in this very early stage of embryogenesis in the mouse, all development ceased at the four-cell stage. It would appear that endogenous retroviruses are playing a very profound, if completely unknown, role at this early stage in mammalian embryogenesis. "

~ Frank Ryan, Virolution (https://books.google.fr/books/about/Virolution.html?id=NSVVAQAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y) The role of viruses is so prominent in human DNA that some researchers (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00523/full) are asking: "Are viruses our oldest ancestors?"

To use an analogy, viruses infusing new information into our genetic code is akin to a software update. From this perspective, diseases caused by exogenous viruses are the physical manifestation of the carrier's struggles to adapt to this "update". In rare cases death ensues - the computer is too old, is not ready for the change, or is unable to absorb the update. But as the Chinese saying goes, "a falling tree makes more noise than a growing forest." In most cases, the update is successful (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28328962/) and totally asymptomatic:
"We explored non-human sequence data from whole-genome sequencing of blood from 8,240 individuals, none of whom were ascertained for any infectious disease. [...] we mapped sequences to 94 different viruses, including sequences from 19 human DNA viruses, proviruses and RNA viruses (herpesviruses, anelloviruses, papillomaviruses, three polyomaviruses, adenovirus, HIV, HTLV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, parvovirus B19, and influenza virus) in 42% of the study participants. " Usually, the exovirus is deactivated and integrated in our DNA painlessly; it has become an endogenous virus. The new viral information is stored in our 'hard drive' (our genome). This new information - sequences of endogenous virus integrated in our DNA - provides us with augmented complexity and functionality.

The above shows the prevalence of viruses in our genetic code and the vital role they play. This perspective provides a different spin to the on-going debate about whether viruses are life forms or not. Actually, viruses seem more fundamental than even life itself; they are the information carriers (genetic codes) from which biological life stems. Viruses are more than life: they are the very source of life; they are the informational precursors, the initiators of life forms.

The Mind-Altering Virus
The above shows the fundamental role viruses play in the development and evolution of life, including human life. They shaped our bodies, our organs, and our very minds. From this perspective, it's no surprise that endogenous viruses, and even exogenous viruses, have an influence on the host's behavior.

There are a number of viruses known to alter the behavior of animal hosts. Rabies "hijacks (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/319735)" the brain and causes the host to be aggressive. Viruses from the family Baculoviridae (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751707/) induce in their hosts changes to both feeding behavior and environment selection. In horses, the Bornavirus (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/borna-disease) is known to cause stupor, hyper-excitability, fearfulness, and aggressiveness.

Viruses also alter behavior in humans (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9155866/):
'Profound changes in behaviour are observed following infection of the central nervous system by some viruses. Irritability, insomnia, hyperactivity and learning disability are some of the behavioural disturbances that have been described in both humans and animals with central nervous system infection." For example, viral encephalitis (https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Meningitis-and-Encephalitis-Fact-Sheet) is commonly caused in humans by arboviruses, including West Nile, herpes viruses and enteroviruses. Symptoms include irritability, lethargy and seizures. In humans, rabies (https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/symptoms/index.html) causes delirium, abnormal behavior, hallucinations. Traces of the Bornavirus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC164222/) have been found in significant numbers of depressed and schizophrenic patients. Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (http://www.health.am/encyclopedia/more/subacute_sclerosing_panencephalitis/) is caused by mutant measles viruses invading the brain. Symptoms include bizarre behavior, muscle jerks, and seizures.

But there is no need to search for rare exotic viruses to find behavior-altering effects, or even positive behavior-altering effects. In 2010, Chris Reiber (http://www.binghamton.edu/anthropology/people/faculty/chris-reiber.html) found evidence that a virus as mundane as the influenza virus alters people behavior by making them more sociable.

Since viruses are the active component of vaccines, it is no surprise that changes in human social behavior have been observed in response to a common vaccine (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1047279710001651?via%3Dihub).

Man-Made Viruses
The first engineered DNA molecule was made in 1972 by Paul Berg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Berg). Berg combined DNA from the monkey virus SV40 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40) with the lambda virus. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_phage) That was almost 50 years ago.

For decades, engineering viruses has been common practice. The active ingredient in most modern vaccines is a genetic sequence extracted from a virus (the sequence that is considered immunogenic but not pathogenic). A paper (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11482348/) published 19 years ago describes how genetically-modified viruses can be used to develop vaccines.

Along a similar line, gene therapy uses genetically-modified viruses to deliver genes that can cure genetic diseases. The first case of successful gene therapy on humans was performed by Martin Cline (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Cline) in 1980. More recently, in 2004 (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12839-gm-virus-shrinks-cancer-tumours-in-humans/?ignored=irrelevant), a genetically-modified virus was designed to exploit the selfish behavior of cancerous cells and treat cancer.

Man-made viruses are also used in mammals (myxomatosis protection (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC111445/) for rabbits), plants (disease resistance (https://www.wired.com/2017/04/save-floridas-famous-oranges-scientists-race-weaponize-virus/) in orange trees), and insects by designing insect-borne viruses (https://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6410/35) that have the ability to modify the genes of crops in already-planted fields. This virus basically transforms non-GMO crops into GMO crops after they have been planted.

The above shows that engineering viruses is now commonplace and that natural viruses can alter behavior. But viruses can be man-made AND alter behavior. This is the subject of a paper (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394098/) published in 2011 by a Rostock laboratory:
"Gene therapy approaches have an effect in animal models of several psychiatric disorders including drug addiction, affective disorders, psychoses and dementia, modifying behavioural parameters via interventions on the molecular and cellular level. [...] stereotactic intracerebral injection of genetically modified viruses are used." Man-Made SARS-CoV-2
The hypothesis according to which SARS-CoV-2 "escaped" from a lab seemed outlandish at first but gained traction over time because of some puzzling evidence. To the point that a number of mainstream media [1 (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-covid-19-origins-investigation-wuhan-lab-accident/)], [2 (https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html)], [3 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-intelligence-sifts-evidence-for-origins-of-coronavirus-11587077170)] reports confirmed that US intelligence was investigating the possibility that the virus came from a

laboratory.

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573724/medium/montagnier_awards_photo_1409_l.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573724/full/montagnier_awards_photo_1409_l.jpg)
Luc Montagnier receiving the 2008 Nobel Prize in medecine


Luc Montagnier is a retired French scientist. He received the 2008 Nobel Prize in medicine for his discovery of the HIV virus. Being a retired Nobel prize winner makes him less sensitive to various pressures (grant cancellation, bad press, and peer pressure). Unlike most of his colleagues, he can, and does, say what he thinks.

Montagnier described SARS-CoV-2 as a man-made "Frankenstein virus (https://www.pourquoidocteur.fr/Articles/Question-d-actu/32184-EXCLUSIF-Pour-Pr-Montagnier-SARS-CoV-2-serait-virus-manipule-Chinois-l-ADN-de-VIH-podcast)" combining various types of viruses. According to Montagnier, the Franken-virus was made from a natural coronavirus, coming from a bat, but to this model was added sequences very similar to HIV-1 and the parasite Plasmodium falciparum, which is responsible for malaria. This point might explain why hydroxychloroquin - an anti-malaria drug - is effective against SARS-CoV-2.

To the question: "Wasn't the coronavirus natural?" Montagnier replied: "No, it was not natural, it was the work of professionals, of molecular biologists, it's a very precise work, we could call it a watchmaker's work".

Montagnier's claims about engineered insertions of HIV sequences in SARS-CoV-2 were confirmed by a paper titled "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag, (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2)" which had to be retracted because of "too much pressure (https://duboutduborddulac.blog.tdg.ch/archive/2020/04/17/selon-le-nobel-montagner-le-covid-19-est-un-virus-manipule-s-305909.html)".

Two (https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/breaking-latestcoronavirus-research-reveals-that-the-virus-has-mutated-gene-similar-to-hiv-and-is-1,000-times-more-potent-) other prominent virologists, namely Ruan Jishou of Nankai University and Li Huan from Huazhong University, came independently to the very same conclusion. In a paper (https://zenodo.org/record/3724003#.XwL0RedS9Eb) published in the International Journal of Research sequences of HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV were identified in the genome of SARS-CoV-2, leading the author to state that the virus had "synthetic origins".

Judy Mikovits was a lab director at the U.S. National Cancer Institute, and was part of the team that was first to isolate the murine retrovirus XMRV. She also worked for several years at Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army's most infamous bioweapons research lab. Mikovits is one of the few who has dared to denounce (https://www.amazon.com/Plague-Corruption-Restoring-Promise-Science/dp/1510752242) the vaccine scandal, for which she subsequently lost her career, her savings and her reputation. She publicly stated (https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-16-dr-judy-mikovits-interviewed-coronavirus-pandemic-fauci-nih-corruption.html) that, given the astounding number (1,200) (https://www.academie-sciences.fr/pdf/rapport/2020_06_11_origine_evolutio_SARSCOV2.pdf) of mutations between the new SARS-CoV-2 and the source bat virus, the former had to be engineered:
Interviewer: Do you believe that this virus [SARS-CoV-2] was created in the laboratory?

Mikovits: [...] That cannot be naturally occurring. Somebody didn't go to a market, get a bat, the virus didn't jump directly to humans. That's not how it works. That's accelerated viral evolution. If it was a natural occurrence, it would take up to 800 years to occur. Bruno Coutard is a researcher for IHU Méditerranée Infection, one the largest virus research facilities in the world. On April 2020, Coutard et al. published (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528#!) in Antiviral Research a detailed analysis of SARS-CoV-2:
"In 2019, a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infecting humans has emerged in Wuhan, China. Its genome has been sequenced and the genomic information promptly released. Despite a high similarity with the genome sequence of SARS-CoV and SARS-like CoVs, we identified a peculiar furin-like cleavage site in the spike protein of 2019-nCoV, lacking in the other SARS-like CoVs [...] This furin-like cleavage site... may provide a gain-of-function to the 2019-nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population." In plain English, "gain-of-function (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285579/)" means "man-made". According to Coutard, it is this man-made intervention that enabled a zoonotic (bat) virus to 'jump' to humans.

Professor of etiology at the National Taiwan University, Fang Chi-tai, (https://asiatimes.com/2020/02/covid-19-may-be-man-made-claims-taiwan-scholar/) has stated that SARS-CoV-2 was probably man-made. There are four more amino acids in the gene sequence of SARS-CoV-2 than in other coronaviruses. According to Fang, natural mutations of viruses will only result in small, singular changes, so it is suspicious to see a naturally mutated virus suddenly take on four amino acids. Those amino acids could have been artificially added to make viral transmission easier.

Czech molecular biologist Dr. Soňa Peková (https://www.dimsumdaily.hk/czech-molecular-biologist-dr-sona-pekova-explains-in-layman-terms-that-covid-19-virus-originates-from-a-lab/) explained that SARS-CoV-2 was man-made because of its deeply modified "control room":
"[...] massive gene changes and transcripts, insertions, deletions, and other complex changes in the magnitude of the RNA SARS-CoV-2 control room, if nature had created it chaotically and randomly, the virus would simply perish because it could not have functioned in an orderly manner." Norwegian scientist Birger Sorensen (https://techstartups.com/2020/06/07/norwegian-scientist-birger-sorensen-claims-coronavirus-lab-made-not-natural-origin/) and Australian scientists (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1287460/coronavirus-news-covid19-latest-china-humans-animals-science-research) in Adelaide and Melbourne came independently to the same conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 is man-made because a virus never before seen in humans before couldn't be so perfectly adapted to humans:
"This is a new virus that has never been in humans before, but it has an extraordinarily high binding to human receptors, which is very surprising. It is almost perfectly human adapted, it couldn't do any better." Artificial additions of HIV and malaria sequences, an engineered furin-like cleavage, amino acids added by design, a modified control room, extraordinary adaptation to humans. All these pieces of evidence point to a man-made virus. And, keep in mind that these are only the proofs brought forth by the few scientists who dared to speak up.

Engineered for What Purpose?
If SARS-CoV-2 was man-made the next question is: "what features were given to the engineered SARS-CoV-2 compared to its natural ancestors?"

To answer this question, let's compare SARS-CoV-2 to its natural relatives, SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome), which are two of only a handful of other coronaviruses (https://www.webmd.com/lung/coronavirus-strains#1) that can infect humans. We will also include in this comparison the seasonal flu (influenza virus).

Transmissibility:
Transmission rate (R0) measures the average number of persons contaminated by a single carrier. R0 for SARS-CoV-2, is between 3 and 5 (https://sph.umich.edu/pursuit/2020posts/how-scientists-quantify-outbreaks.html). That's several times higher than SARS with a R0 equal to 1.8 (https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(20)30171-3/fulltext) and MERS whose R0 is lower than 1 (https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(20)30171-3/fulltext). Similarly, the seasonal flu is moderately contagious; its R0 is about 1.3 (https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480)

Pathogenicity:
Mass testing in Iceland revealed that 50% (https://english.alarabiya.net/en/features/2020/03/25/Coronavirus-Iceland-s-mass-testing-finds-half-of-carriers-show-no-symptoms.html) of the SARS-CoV-2 carriers are asymptomatic. This figure is consistent with the Diamond Princess case where 75% (https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2020/almost-75-people-board-diamond-princess-covid-19-may-have-been-asymptomatic) of the carriers were asymptomatic. SARS and MERS are markedly more pathogenic with only 7-13% (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/7/04-1165_article) and 25.4% (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30550839/) of healthy carriers respectively. The seasonal flu exhibits a similarly high pathogenicity with an asymptomatic fraction of between 4 and 28% (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586318/).

Mortality:
Countries that didn't conduct mass testing provide an artificially inflated death rate because the number of infected people tends to be under-evaluated given the high proportion of asymptomatic carriers described above.

Iceland was one the few countries to conduct mass testing and it exhibits a 0.5% (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/iceland/) fatality rate, which is exactly the same number observed (https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-outbreak-diamond-princess-cruise-ship-death-rate) onboard the Diamond Princess. Still, this percentage tends to be overestimated because it amalgamates (https://www.sott.net/article/436327-Everything-You-Think-You-Know-About-Coronavirus) "dead with SARS-CoV-2" with "dead because of SARS-CoV-2," despite obvious co-morbidity factors.

In addition, the financial incentives (https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/) given for COVID-19 deaths, the almost non-existent seasonal flu deaths this winter (counted instead as COVID-19 deaths), the Do Not Resuscitate orders (https://www.sott.net/article/437009-Covid-19-Has-Turned-Public-Health-Into-a-Patient-Killing-Experiment) and the bogus death certificates (https://greatgameindia.com/covid-19-deaths-certificates-scam/), all contributed to overinflate the COVID-19 fatality rate even more.

Despite these overinflated numbers, SARS exhibits a much higher fatality rate (9.5% (https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(20)30171-3/fulltext)) and MERS is 68 times deadlier with a 34% (https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/) fatality rate. Typically, the seasonal flu has a 0.1% (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516362/) fatality rate, which is comparable with SARS-CoV-2 rate once overinflated numbers are put aside.

Neurological effects:
SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a surprisingly high percentage of neurological effects. Depending on the sources, between 36% (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/coronavirus-patients-neurological-symptoms-covid19/) and 84% (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2008597) of CoVID-19 patients display neurological effects.

In addition, SARS-CoV-2 induces a wide range of neurological symptoms (https://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/info-2020/covid-19-brain-symptoms.html): slower-than-normal cognitive speeds, memory loss, impaired concentration, confusion, severe agitation, encephalitis, seizures, numbness, strokes, dizziness, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, cerebral hemorrhage, headaches, loss of taste and loss of smell.

SARS also exhibits neurological effects, but their occurrence is rare (about 2.5% (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15503102/)) and their range narrow. Between 8% and 24% (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25303830/) of MERS carriers exhibit neurological symptoms, mostly (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198407/) confusion and seizures. Influenza also causes a few neurological symptoms (encephalopathy and seizure) in 5% (https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/2/suppl_1/987/2635228) of patients.

Published research (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2008597) has revealed that in enhanced brain MRIs performed on COVID-19 patients, frontotemporal hypoperfusion was noted in every single patient. It suggests that SARS-CoV-2 might particularly affect this specific region, for which the most frequent condition is called frontotemporal dementia (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16540253/), one of its main symptom (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092493381531110X) being automatic obedience (https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article/37/2/235/1929251). Similarly, in healthy individuals subjected to Milgram-like (https://www.verywellmind.com/the-milgram-obedience-experiment-2795243) experiments, the obedience (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324626386_Role_des_mecanismes_d%27autoregulation_dans_la_soumission_a_l%27autorite) to authorities is associated with lower activity in the frontotemporal region. Along the same line, when subjects are asked to make a decision with moral content, it is the temporal (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17404215/) lobe that becomes active.

The table below recapitulates our main findings:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573350/large/covid_mers_sars.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573350/full/covid_mers_sars.jpg)
SARS-CoV-2 compared with MERS, SARS and influenza © Sott.net


At this point, we know some of the specificities of a likely man-made SARS-CoV-2 compared with its relatives MERS, SARS, and to a lesser extent, influenza. We can perhaps then deduce what were the objectives of the virus designers.

SARS-CoV-2 was definitely not engineered to kill; quite the contrary, carriers had to stay alive (low fatality rate). More than that, carriers were supposed to be invisible (low pathogenicity) and the virus was to spread widely (high transmissibility).

SARS-CoV-2 was engineered to spread widely and silently and to reach the brain, affecting the region relating to moral-based decisions and obedience. What were the designers aiming to modify in carriers' brains? Was the objective of the virus to increase obedience?

Let's leave these questions hanging for a moment and look more closely at the Mecca of man-made viruses and mind control: Fort Detrick.

Cont'd below...

[Gwin Ru]

Fort Detrick And Viruses


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573799/large/5b19b714cbb73_image.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573799/full/5b19b714cbb73_image.jpg)
Part of Fort Detrick infrastructures


At the dawn of WW2, the USA was already the leader in biological and chemical weapons production, with Edgewood (https://books.google.fr/books?id=eUHAO-CM6U0C&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=Edgewood+Arsenal+had+grown+to+become+the+largest+chemical+and+biological+weapons+facility+ever+as sembled+worldwide.&source=bl&ots=9ubV3BK7BN&sig=ACfU3U0Kb0y0n3Vvbc2NY-yIbPWNpkmvkA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj1jZ2e4JjqAhVE5eAKHfVYAgsQ6AEwAHoECA0QAQ#v=onepage&q=Edgewood%20Arsenal%20had%20grown%20to%20become%20the%20largest%20chemical%20and%20biological%20wea pons%20facility%20ever%20assembled%20worldwide.&f=false) Arsenal being the largest chemical and biological weapons facility in the world with a staff of 1,200 researchers.

In 1943, biological and chemical weapons development was transferred to Fort Detrick. In order to gain even more knowledge about biological weapons, the US gave immunity to leading Nazi scientists like Erich Traub (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Traub), a virologist who specialized in foot-and-mouth disease, Rinderpest and Newcastle disease. He was lab chief of the Nazis' leading bio-weapons facility on Riems Island.
"Months into his Operation Paperclip contract, Traub was asked to meet with US scientists from Fort Detrick[...]. Traub discussed work done at the Reich Research Institute for Virus Diseases of Animals on Riems Island during World War II for the Nazis, and work done after the war there for the Russians. Traub gave a detailed explanation of the secret operation at the Institute, and his activities there. This information provided the ground work for Fort Detrick's offshore germ warfare animal disease lab on Plum Island. "

~ Carroll, Michael (2004). Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Germ Laboratory (https://archive.org/details/lab257disturbing00carr/page/7). New York: HarperCollins Publishers. pp. 7-8 (https://archive.org/details/lab257disturbing00carr/page/7) In exchange for the transfer of bioweapons knowledge to Fort Detrick, the US also provided immunity to leaders of the infamous Unit 731 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731#cite_note-2), a covert Japanese bioweapon research group, which practiced live vivisection and killed more than 300,000 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/28/artsandhumanities.japan) Chinese citizens through germ warfare.

By the 1950s, Fort Detrick was already experimenting with a large number of viruses and other germs:
"Operation Harness, a less than successful experimental program involving teams of American, British, and Canadian microbiologists who sprayed virulent agents like anthrax, brucellosis and tularemia over the Bahamas, Antigua and New Hebrides. [...] Other lesser known SOD projects undertaken prior to the formalization of a relationship with the CIA involved testing the effects of salmonella poisoning, botulinum toxin sprays, kala-azar (a parasitic disease), lymphogranuloma inguinal (a herpes-like virus), yaws and, perhaps most ominous of all, developing 'the ability to induce cancer through covert means'."

~ Hank Albarelli, A Terrible Mistake (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=kala-azar%20&f=false) Germ warfare experiments were conducted on unwitting subjects and caused a number of deaths in "enemy" countries, 3rd world countries, "allied" countries like France (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=esprit&f=false) and the US population - not just prostitutes, inmates, or mental patients, but "normal citizens" - like during the exposure of 800,000 San Francisco residents to Serratia marcescens (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=nevin&f=false).

In 1969, amidst huge protests against the Vietnam War and growing revelations about the use of Agent Orange (created (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=agent%20orange&f=false) by Frederick Hoffman and Fort Detrick's biochemists) and napalm against civilian populations, president Nixon announced an alleged ban on the use of chemical and biological weapons. It was, however, a fake ban, as shown by the convention (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_biological_weapons_program) signed in 1972:
"The United States will confine its biological research to defensive measures such as immunization and safety measures." Basically, the only change was that now the US had to point the finger at an alleged bioterrorist to pursue - or to later 'justify' - its research on a given bioweapon. And that's exactly what they did with the Iraq anthrax story. Iraq was allegedly developing anthrax bioweapons, one of the excuses (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/15/anthrax.afghanistan) for waging war on Iraq. It was the same anthrax that was sent in the mail by "bio-terrorists" a few weeks after 9/11 (convenient timing to hype the 'evil Muslim terrorist' frenzy).


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573805/large/powell_un_anthrax.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573805/full/powell_un_anthrax.jpg)
Colin Powell presenting a vial of anthrax at the UN


In the end, investigations revealed that the anthrax didn't come from Iraq but from Fort Detrick. Quite an unconvenient fact. But a convenient patsy was soon found. According to the FBI, the anthrax letters had been sent by a crazy employee: Bruce Edwards Ivins (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Edwards_Ivins), an award-winning microbiologist who had worked in Fort Detrick for 18 years.

10 years later a scientific analysis of anthrax strains conducted by the National Academy of Science concluded that the FBI overstated (https://www.propublica.org/article/new-evidence-disputes-case-against-bruce-e-ivins) the strength of genetic analysis linking the mailed anthrax to a supply kept by Bruce E. Ivins. The anthrax was from Fort Detrick, but Ivins was probably not the culprit. Ivin died in 2008, allegedly from a tylenol overdose. No autopsy was performed, and the body was soon cremated. Dead men tell no tales.

Today, scientists at Fort Detrick are still conducting intensive research on man-made biological weapons in general, and engineered viruses in particular. For example, in 2016, Fort Detrick was involved in research concerning the use of bats (https://phys.org/news/2018-04-egyptian-fruit-genome-yields-clues.html) and the viruses they carry as bioweapons. In 2018, Fort Detrick conducted research (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29566060/) on the MERS coronavirus, a close relative of SARS-CoV-2.

Fort Detrick also uses an advanced technology called CRISPR-Cas9 to extract specific genetic sequences from viruses. According to a paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-15416-3#Sec30) published in 2017, Fort Detrick teams used this technology for extracting viral sequences coding for a "cleavage furin site". Coincidentally, or not, according to some researchers (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528?via%3Dihub), it is the unexpected cleavage furin site found in SARS-CoV-2 that provides its unusually high virulence and proves that it is man-made.

Above is about the extent of the publicly available research emanating from Fort Detrick. Being a military site closely tied with the CIA, where secrecy is paramount, Fort Detrick and associated labs around the world operate within closed networks of communication and publishing.

Fort Detrick and Mind Control
In parallel to researching and designing biological weapons, Fort Detrick is heavily involved in mind control (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=electro-shock&f=false). Beginning after WW2, the methods included the use of various drugs (heroin, mescaline, LSD, MDMA, synthetic THC and morphine), polygraph, electro-shock therapy, the use of "mechanical aids" , lobotomies, hypnotism, fatigue, isolation, sensory deprivation, and torture.

MKULTRA is the best known mind control program because of the revelations about the horrific experiments conducted by Sydney Gottlieb (https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/15/cia-fort-detrick-stephen-kinzer-228109), CIA chemist and head of some mind control experiments in Fort Detrick, and Dr. Ewen Cameron (https://www.wbur.org/endlessthread/2020/05/08/madness-part-three-subproject) from the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. But this was only the tip of the iceberg; the exposed experiments were only part of sub-project 68, one of 144 sub-projects contained in MKULTRA.

MKULTRA branched into many additional "avenues (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=avenues&f=false) of control of human behavior, including radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and materials."


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574199/large/7ec52b1b847e0f9deb4324356f7b66.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574199/full/7ec52b1b847e0f9deb4324356f7b66.jpg)
A young girl subjected to MKULTRA experiments


Following the exposure of sub-project 68, MKULTRA was officially discontinued in 1964. The truth is that it didn't end in 1964; it was merely re-labelled Project MKSEARCH (https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/dec/14/cia-mkultra-lies/).

In addition, MKULTRA was only one of numerous programs dedicated to mind control; other known programs are ARTICHOKE, Bluebird, QKHILLTOP, Chemical Corps, MKNAOMI, MKSHADE. All were dedicated to 'understanding' the human mind and finding all possible ways to control it.

The ultimate goal of mind control experiments conducted at Fort Detrick and its myriad satellite organizations (laboratories, hospitals, biotech companies, pharmaceutical companies, and prisons) was best captured in 1952, when Paul Gaynor, head of the CIA Security Research Service, described the purpose (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=self-preservation&f=false) of ARTICHOKE:
[Gaynor] posed the project's ultimate question to the CIA's Medical Office chief: "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against such fundamental laws of nature [like] self-preservation? The two main research topics in Fort Detrick, namely biological weapons and mind control were not compartmentalized. By the very admission (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjIiPXIiKLqAhXFzYUKHbakBbAQ6AEwAHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=employment%20in%20clandestine%20operations&f=false) of the CIA to the U.S. Justice Department during the 1975 investigation, MKULTRA, centered around Fort Detrick, associated biological materials and mind control:
[MKULTRA] activities that were concerned with the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior. This association is confirmed by documentation of experiments associating infectious disease and human behavior, conducted as early as 1959:
Milwaukee (AP) - The CIA recruited University of Wisconsin scientists for two experiments between 1959 and 1962, the Milwaukee Journal reported in today's edition. Documents obtained by the newspaper indicate university administrators may not have been informed of CIA involvement in the research projects. However, the documents show researchers knew about CIA sponsorship and the objects of the research. The experiments involved Infectious disease and human behavior.

~ Glenn E. Tagatz, ENIGMA: A Veteran's Quest for Truth (https://books.google.fr/books/about/Enigma.html?id=YBhGngEACAAJ&redir_esc=y) Sydney Gottlieb was a PhD student under the supervision of Ira Baldwin at the University of Wisconsin. Dr Ira Baldwin (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=wisconsin&f=false) would eventually chair the Department of Bacteriology at the university before becoming Fort Detrick's director of scientific research.

The above shows that the convergence between infectious diseases and human behavior research began more than 60 years ago. Since then both fields of research have made tremendous 'progress'.

A paper mentioned above describes viruses genetically modified to alter behavior, published in 2011 by a Rostock team. If a modest lab in Rostock could publicly publish a paper on a mind-altering engineered virus in 2011, you can imagine what Fort Detrick is able to secretly create nowadays.

Today, Fort Detrick thrives as the US army's principal base for biological research and mind control, employing nearly 8,000 people (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Detrick) in 600 buildings on 13,000 acres. Over the last 70 years it has invested billions of dollars in mind control and engineered viruses.

Made in China or Made in the USA?
Wuhan level 4 laboratory is a civil facility researching treatments against existing viruses, while Fort Detrick is the largest military bioweapon facility in the world, and one of its core activities is the creation of new man-made viruses. SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus and, as shown above, it is likely man-made.

The creation of the Wuhan laboratory in 2015 (https://www.nature.com/news/inside-the-chinese-lab-poised-to-study-world-s-most-dangerous-pathogens-1.21487) pales in comparison to Fort Detrick and its decades of activity in biological weapons and mind control. The only argument in favor of a Wuhan-engineered SARS-CoV-2 is the location of "patient zero", allegedly found in a Wuhan market in December 2019. This allegation was soon debunked by a paper (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally) suggesting that the Wuhan market was not the place of origin of the epidemics.

While there is no patient zero to be found in Wuhan, a series of mysterious epidemics near Fort Detrick predate, by months, the Wuhan outbreak.

On July 2nd, 2019, a mysterious respiratory epidemic struck Greenspring Senior Living community, located in Springfield, Virginia, which is only 50 miles from Fort Detrick. Retrospectively, the described symptoms (https://abcnews.go.com/US/respiratory-outbreak-investigated-retirement-community-54-residents-fall/story?id=64275865) are very close to those associated with SARS-CoV-2. The epidemiological statistics (for old people) are also similar to SARS-CoV-2; with 263 residents, 63 became sick and 3 died.

Laboratory tests (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/health/outbreak-investigation-assisted-living-facility-springfield) conducted by the CDC did not identify a specific cause for the mysterious respiratory illness. Remember that, at the time, SARS-CoV-2 was unknown (therefore undetectable) since its official discovery (https://www.pasteur.fr/en/medical-center/disease-sheets/covid-19-disease-novel-coronavirus) was announced on January 9th, 2020 by the WHO.

Springfield was not an isolated case. Virginia reported an unusual increase in respiratory illnesses located in 16 (https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Jump-in-respiratory-illnesses-reported-across-Virginia-513159371.html) geographic clusters that lasted, at least, until December 2019 (https://eu.newsleader.com/story/news/2019/07/22/virginia-seeing-increase-respiratory-illness-health-dept-warns/1795086001/) and struck typical COVID-19 patients: "Most of the reports have occurred among older adults and those with chronic medical conditions in assisted living and long-term care facilities."

On July 26th, 24 days after the Springfield outbreak, another mysterious respiratory syndrome, quickly attributed to vaping, emerged in Illinois and Wisconsin, with 8 persons hospitalized (https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/26/health/wisconsin-8-teens-lung-damage/index.html) due to symptoms that are, again, reminiscent of COVID-19: "Scans and X-rays showed inflammation or swelling throughout both lungs [...] The severity of health condition has varied, with some patients needing assistance in order to breathe."


The patients' lung scans showed the 'ground glass shadow' typical of COVID-19.

In the subsequent months, the 'vaping syndrome' spread rapidly to other US states (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1912818). It reached 908 cases and 3 deaths as of September 20th. The exponential increase in cases is clearly evocative of a contagious disease:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/571638/large/vaping_syndrom.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/571638/full/vaping_syndrom.jpg)

Cases of Vaping-Associated Pulmonary Disease in the United States.


If this mysterious respiratory disease is due to vaping, how do we explain that it started in the US Northeast and only occurred within the US, while there are tens of millions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_cigarette) of e-cigarette users all over the world? About the 'vaping syndrome', John Britton, a British professor of respiratory medicine, stated (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-vaping-britain/vaping-illness-deaths-likely-very-rare-beyond-u-s-experts-say-idUSKBN1WT1XP):
What's happening in the U.S. is not happening here (in Britain), nor is it happening in any other countries where vaping is common. Britton adds that vaping is far less dangerous than smoking, that the claims are completely false, and that the syndrome is not caused by vaping. Around the time of the official beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the mysterious vaping syndrome that had by then required 2,800 hospitalizations and caused 70 deaths, magically vanished - although large numbers of people in the US are still vaping.

Around the end of 2019, the US was also experiencing the earliest flu epidemic (https://time.com/5746409/early-flu-season-2019-2020/) since 2002-2003. The "flu" was 15 days earlier (https://time.com/5746409/early-flu-season-2019-2020/) than usual. According to the Asahi News Report (http://en.people.cn/n3/2020/0223/c90000-9661026.html), some of the 14,000 Americans who died 'from' (or with) this 'early influenza' may have unknowingly contracted the SARS-CoV-2.

It was in this context of mysterious respiratory epidemics striking the US in general, and the vicinities of Fort Detrick in particular, that 300 US soldiers arrived in Wuhan, China, for the World Military Games that lasted from October 18th to October 27th, 2019. Just before the trip, some of the US soldiers had trained (https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage) in Fort Belvoir, 50 miles from Fort Detrick and 6 miles from Springfield, Virginia (the first cluster of the mysterious respiratory disease).

The US team stayed at the Wuhan Oriental Hotel, which is just 300 meters (https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage) from Wuhan's Huanan Seafood market:


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572402/large/Map_showing_where_the_military.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/572402/full/Map_showing_where_the_military.jpg)
Locations of the Wuhan vaccine lab, the hotel of the American soldiers and the Wuhan fish market. © Mettalicman


Unexpectedly, the US team did not perform very well at the games (https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/03/13/china-us-brought-covid19-to-china-during-army-games-hid-disease-in-us-as-influenza/): "The U.S. team, known for their competitive skills, did terribly; only 172 participated, almost half didn't even compete in their events."
Despite having the largest military in the world, ten fold, the US came in 35th behind nations like Iran, Finland and Slovenia. It seems that the mysterious infectious outbreak that occurred around Fort Detrick a few weeks previously may have infected participants of the World Military Games. Five "foreign" athletes (https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1180549.shtml) were hospitalized for an undetermined infection. Many foreign athletes from France (https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/auvergne-rhone-alpes/loire/saint-etienne/coronavirus-athlete-stephanoise-affirme-avoir-ete-contaminee-octobre-wuhan-lors-jeux-mondiaux-militaires-1825160.html), Belgium (https://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail_coronavirus-des-sportifs-belges-ont-ils-ete-contamines-lors-des-jeux-mondiaux-militaires-le-chu-de-liege-met-a-l-epreuve-cette-hypothese?id=10500036), Germany (https://www.news18.com/news/sports/new-revelations-from-world-military-games-participants-hint-at-covid-19-spread-in-china-in-october-2625391.html) Italy (https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3932712), Sweden (https://www.soundhealthandlastingwealth.com/covid-19/more-competitors-reveal-they-were-ill-at-the-world-military-games/), Luxembourg (https://in.news.yahoo.com/revelations-world-military-games-participants-083500325.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS91cmw_c2E9dCZyY3Q9aiZxPSZlc3JjPXMmc291cmNlPXdlYiZjZD0mdm VkPTJhaFVLRXdqWmpxWDAzZjdwQWhXUUFHTUJIWG1SQ0tRUUZqQUNlZ1FJQWhBQiZ1cmw9aHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZpbi5uZXdzLn lhaG9vLmNvbSUyRnJldmVsYXRpb25zLXdvcmxkLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWdhbWVzLXBhcnRpY2lwYW50cy0wODM1MDAzMjUuaHRtbCZ1c2 c9QU92VmF3MVh0SEVsdDR6WHoxYnp4WUdsWXpHcw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABE6Mqu95-qzAtWlm4JxOUHXQq9GHORduCsOKUhQ6dRiuzGTiVq0_ThMXp9KfZvGk-MmnL9A5ZNO7Yf89CnAxeZeuF6m_L3_QOV-wbYk4d0Q6vJWeuiMQgY9vW3qGPnB147WqAHR5Ga1Fa8pp8evYPkfo3WmEdeUkTMKgxhYQM-M) have revealed that they fell ill at the World Military Games, and thought, retrospectively, that what they had was COVID-19.

The first real COVID-19 case (http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2020/03/fort-detrick-biowarfare-lab-leak-in-2019/) among Wuhan locals appeared on November 2, only six days after the end of the military games. Coincidentally or not, 42 employees (https://ahtribune.com/world/covid-19/3994-us-did-bring-covid-19-to-wuhan.html) of the Oriental Hotel (where the US delegation stayed) were diagnosed in November with COVID-19, becoming the first cluster in Wuhan.

Conveniently, Fort Detrick received a cease-and-desist order (http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2020/03/fort-detrick-biowarfare-lab-leak-in-2019/) from the CDC and was shut down on July 15th 2019, just 13 days after the beginning of the nearby mysterious respiratory outbreak in Springfield, VA. A senior scientist described the atmosphere (https://www.city-journal.org/biosecurity-failure-usamriid) in Fort Detrick at the time as one of 'fear and mistrust' . Fort Detrick re-opened (https://trone.house.gov/media/in-the-news/maryland-lawmakers-applaud-cdc-s-decision-reopen-fort-detrick-facility) in April 2020, at the tail end of the pandemic.

From an Obedience Vaccine to a Mutated Disobedience Virus?

So far the data suggests that Fort Detrick engineered SARS-CoV-2. Contained in a vaccine, it may have targeted brain function, particularly regions associated with obedience/moral decision-making. But if SARS-CoV-2 was designed to increase the obedience of its subjects, how do we explain the worldwide unprecedented measures to minimize its spread?

Well, sometimes things don't go according to plan, especially with viruses.

Allegedly, vaccines contain "dead" virus but this viral deactivation doesn't always work and "live" viruses can escape their vaccine. This is exactly what happened with the Salk polio (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/) vaccine which caused the worst polio outbreak in history, infecting 200,000 people with live polio, of whom 70,000 became sick.

In addition to escaping vaccines, viruses have the tremendous ability to mutate (https://jvi.asm.org/content/84/19/9733). Interestingly, mutations can totally reverse (https://www.hhmi.org/news/the-flu-viruss-ability-to-mutate-may-sometimes-be-its-downfall) the 'original' or 'intended' effects of a virus:
"[...] an un-mutated virus was more likely to produce lots of viral RNA and less likely to trigger the cellular alarm. Mutated viruses generally had the opposite effect." Did SARS-CoV-2 follow the sequence of events described above?

Engineered virus
Incorporation into a vaccine
Virus escapes from the vaccine
Virus mutates and reverses effects

The evidence seems to confirm this hypothesis:

1/ Engineered virus
Despite the secrecy surrounding this type of activity, several pieces of evidence suggest that Fort Detrick was involved in research closely related to the engineering of SARS-CoV-2.

In 2016, Fort Detrick was involved in bioweapons research concerning the use of bats (https://phys.org/news/2018-04-egyptian-fruit-genome-yields-clues.html) and the viruses they carry.



In 2017, the US government lifted a ban (https://www.businessinsider.com/nih-lifts-ban-on-flu-mers-sars-virus-gain-of-function-research-2017-12?IR=T) on engineering deadly viruses to make them transmissible among humans. This article (https://www.businessinsider.com/nih-lifts-ban-on-flu-mers-sars-virus-gain-of-function-research-2017-12?IR=T) specifically mentions engineering SARS and MERS (close relatives of SARS-CoV-2) so that they spread more easily or become more fatal.



Fort Detrick also uses an advanced technology called CRISPR-Cas9 to extract specific genetic sequences from viruses. According to a paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-15416-3#Sec30) published in 2017, Fort Detrick teams used this technology for the extraction of viral sequences coding for a "cleavage furin site".



In 2018, research (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29566060/) was conducted in Fort Detrick, focused on the MERS coronavirus, a close relative of SARS-CoV-2.

2/ Incorporation into a vaccine

https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574249/large/pbshot1000.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574249/full/pbshot1000.jpg)


For more than two centuries (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01397/full), US soldiers have been used as guinea pigs for vaccines. Every year new vaccines are tested on troops. Any of the many inoculations administered around 2018 might have contained SARS-CoV-2, including the mandatory (https://www.army.mil/article/214757/vaccination_is_the_best_defense_against_the_flu) yearly influenza vaccine, or one of these novel coronavirus-based vaccines:

In 2018, CEPI funded $56 million towards Inovio's DNA vaccine program (https://cepi.net/news_cepi/inovio-awarded-up-to-56-million-from-cepi-to-advance-dna-vaccines-against-lassa-fever-and-mers/) against the coronavirus that causes MERS. USAMRIID (Fort Detrick) was a partner in this program.

Also in 2018, a patent (https://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/just-a-coincidence-a-u-s-patent-for-an-attenuated-coronavirus-was-filed-in-2015-and-granted-in-2018) was granted (filed in 2015) for a vaccine containing man-made coronavirus. The vaccine was funded by the WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation:
The present invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene encoding polyproteins comprising a mutation in one or more of non-structural protein(s) [...] The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject." 3/ Virus escapes from the vaccine
The escape probably happened around the beginning of summer 2019, as suggested by the outbreak of strange respiratory diseases that began near Fort Detrick and spread to the rest of the US within months. Until then, the virus was contained in the vaccine.

4/ Virus mutates and reverses neurological effects
Between the first vaccine inoculation, probably in 2018, and the end of 2019, SARS-COV-2 mutated. The mass testing conducted in Iceland revealed 40 mutations (https://english.alarabiya.net/en/features/2020/03/25/Coronavirus-Iceland-s-mass-testing-finds-half-of-carriers-show-no-symptoms.html) in SARS-CoV-2. A paper (https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/7/6/1012/5775463) published in March 2020 went further by identifying 149 mutations sites and two distinct strains: the L lineage and the S lineage.

The L lineage exhibits a significantly higher number of mutations, while the S lineage is more related to coronaviruses in animals. This suggests that the S lineage is the strain originally contained in the vaccine (obedience) while the L lineage is the strain that appeared after the mutation (disobedience).

In September 2019, before the Wuhan epidemic, but after the mysterious respiratory illnesses in the US, president Trump signed an 'emergency' Executive Order (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-united-states-promote-national-security-public-health/) that gave 120 days for the development of a novel flu vaccine, "just in case."

Lock-down to Minimize Spread Not Fatality
We witnessed two very distinct 'lockdowns'. The first one in Wuhan was decided in the face of a virus that was as yet unknown, at least to Chinese scientists. The second was a worldwide (though primarily Western) lockdown imposed by whoever controls the WHO, after SARS-COV-2 was ascertained to be not deadlier than a common flu.

Wuhan authorities made a logical decision. At the time, the virus was unknown and no treatment was yet developed. Chinese officials identified an infectious cluster whose timing and location fit the period in which US soldiers were in Wuhan. They rightly suspected a potentially deadly viral weapon engineered in the US (as they stated (https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/21/coronavirus-escaped-us-lab-chinas-state-tv-anchor-claims-12586026/) as early as March).

As in the Middle Ages during the Black Death, confinement was the only solution. In the absence of a cure, it is an attempt to minimize the spread of the virus by avoiding any social contact.

But Chinese virologists quickly determined that SARS-COV-2 , although engineered in the US, was not worse than a seasonal flu and effective treatments were available. Soon the lockdown was lifted. Notice that Wuhan is only a tiny geographic region in China. The rest of China experience limited or no lockdowns. Quickly, China and neighboring countries adopted a test-and-treat approach that was successful: the fatality rate in China is estimated to be 0.6%. (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30243-7/fulltext)

The lockdown imposed in the West was a very different story. By this time, it was clear that SARS-COV-2 was not the new plague; furthermore, testing kits and effective treatments (hydroxychloroquine, azytromycine, zinc) were available. So there was a better solution than lockdown in terms of "saving lives".


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573810/large/Screenshot_2020_06_23_A_Compre.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/573810/full/Screenshot_2020_06_23_A_Compre.png)
Lock-down vs no lock-down


The total lockdown imposed on billions of individuals epitomizes the line of force developed in this article. At any given time, the authorities will choose control over 'saving lives'. If necessary, they will sacrifice life to preserve or increase their control. That is exactly what happened with the Western lockdown, which increased the COVID-19 fatality rate (https://www.sott.net/article/436327-Everything-You-Think-You-Know-About-Coronavirus) (no herd immunity, no testing, no early treatment), and the overall fatality rate because of the increases in suicides, depression, poverty, and delayed or canceled medical care.

Western authorities deliberately chose the worst solution (from the perspective of "saving lives") because it was the best one in terms of control. They chose the lockdown to minimize the spread of what I suspect is a 'beneficial' disobedience mutation, even though they knew that it would cause a number of unnecessary deaths.

The premise of the lockdown was "COVID-19 is deadly", so in order to save lives we had to stay at home. In truth, the virus was not deadly at all, but the lockdown was. A self-fulfilling prophecy; where the remedy (lockdown) caused more deaths than the disease (COVID-19) (https://www.sott.net/article/436327-Everything-You-Think-You-Know-About-Coronavirus). A number of deaths caused by the lockdown were counted as COVID-19 deaths, making the initial bogus claim (that COVID-19 is deadly) seem apparently true.

Notice that three (https://www.portugalresident.com/covid-19-portugal-becomes-4th-country-to-suspend-use-of-hydroxychloroquine/) of the countries that imposed total lockdown (France, Italy, Belgium) also banned an effective, cheap and safe drug: hydroxychloroquine. Unsurprisingly, those three countries exhibit some of the highest fatality rates in the world as indicated in the diagram above.

Conclusion

In this article we examined evidence suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered at Fort Detrick and incorporated into a vaccine for the express purpose of spreading widely and affecting neurological functions related to obedience.

But, it seems, this project backfired, first with the 'obedience virus' mutating into a 'disobedience virus', forcing the authorities to take rushed measures to restrict the spread of the beneficial mutant - at any price.

The total lockdown was a desperate attempt to minimize the spread of potentially beneficial effects of the mutated SARS-CoV-2. But it backfired a second time because the lockdown seems to have actually increased (https://twitter.com/raoult_didier/status/1260876450992926720) the transmission rate:
"Government study about COVID-19 seroprevalence in Spain: among workers, those who had an "essential profession" and continued working were less infected than those staying at home. This should lead to a reflection on the role of general confinement." Having failed to contain the spread of the beneficial mutant, one of the only options left was to cancel the beneficial effects. The authorities are busy preparing the public for what is to come; for months we keep hearing about the "second wave" and "the vaccine against COVID-19."

What follows is only a prediction made in a very chaotic context. It's probable that by the end of 2020, like every year, a flu epidemic will emerge. This virus will, conveniently, be deemed a close relative to SARS-CoV-2, maybe with 'extra terrifying features'.

But there will be no need to despair because, by this time, the authorities will have prepared a vaccine. That's one of the reasons why hydroxycholoroquine was lambasted and banned. If a safe and effective treatment already exists, who is going to accept a rushed and unknown vaccine? A vaccine that will allegedly protect people against COVID-20, but will in reality be designed to 'cancel' the beneficial changes induced by the mutated strain of SARS-CoV-2.

Fort Detrick, despite allegedly being closed between July 2019 and April 2020, is already testing (https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2204940/army-targets-covid-19-vaccine-by-end-of-year-human-testing-in-summer/) a vaccine. Isn't that rather quick? Perhaps not, given that people at Fort Detrick likely already know a lot about SARS-CoV-2 and its neurological effects.

It's probable that the vaccination won't be mandatory. Remember that the authorities are now "kinder and gentler". Instead of brute force, the authorities are more likely to use moral blackmail - "Get vaccinated to protect others!" - combined with social blackmail - "No vaccine = no job, no shopping, no travel, no socializing!" Basically, you're free to choose between the vaccine passport (https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/06/28/2022-vaccination-passport-eu-keeps-quiet-over-suspicious-documents/) or a life sentence in an isolated cell.

In the end, the take-home message from this article is not so much about SARS-COV-2, which is finally just one more chapter in the big book of lies told by authorities, and the human tragedy of believing those lies. The principal message is that authorities are not here to protect us. The only thing that can protect us is knowledge, including the visceral knowledge that authorities do not protect us - quite the contrary, actually.



https://www.sott.net/avatar/friend/192 (https://www.sott.net/article/437083-Compelling-Evidence-That-SARS-CoV-2-Was-Man-Made#searching) Pierre Lescaudron (https://www.sott.net/article/437083-Compelling-Evidence-That-SARS-CoV-2-Was-Man-Made#searching) https://www.sott.net/images/20_user.png (https://www.sott.net/user/192-axel-dunor)
Pierre Lescaudron (M.Sc., MBA) pursued a career in executive management, consulting and post-graduate teaching in high tech fields.

He then became an editor and writer for SOTT.net, fulfilling his dream of researching science, technology and history.

[Gwin Ru]

Neurologists warn of potential for serious brain disorders in people with mild coronavirus symptoms (https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/health-family/warning-of-serious-brain-disorders-in-people-with-mild-coronavirus-symptoms-1.4299112)

Ian Sample
The Irish Times (https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/health-family/warning-of-serious-brain-disorders-in-people-with-mild-coronavirus-symptoms-1.4299112)
Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:29 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/575429/large/Fulminating_ADEM_showing_many_.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/575429/full/Fulminating_ADEM_showing_many_.jpg)
Fulminating Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) showing many lesions. © Rodríguez-Porcel F, Hornik A, Rosenblum J, Borys E, Biller J


Doctors may be missing signs of serious and potentially fatal brain disorders triggered by coronavirus, as they emerge in mildly affected or recovering patients, scientists have warned.

Neurologists are today publishing details of more than 40 UK Covid-19 patients whose complications ranged from brain inflammation and delirium to nerve damage and stroke. In some cases the neurological problem was the patient's first and main symptom.

The cases, published (https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/doi/10.1093/brain/awaa240/5868408) in the journal Brain, reveal a rise in a life-threatening condition called acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (Adem), as the first wave of infections swept across Europe. At University College London's Institute of Neurology, Adem cases rose from one a month before the pandemic to two or three a week in April and May. One woman, who was 59, died of the complication.

A dozen patients had inflammation of the central nervous system, 10 had brain disease with delirium or psychosis, eight had strokes and a further eight had peripheral nerve problems, mostly diagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome, an immune reaction that attacks the nerves and causes paralysis. It is fatal in 5 per cent of cases.
"We're seeing things in the way Covid-19 affects the brain that we haven't seen before with other viruses," says Michael Zandi, a senior author on the study and a consultant at the institute and University College London Hospitals NHS foundation trust.

"What we've seen with some of these Adem patients, and in other patients, is you can have severe neurology, you can be quite sick, but actually have trivial lung disease.

"Biologically, Adem has some similarities with multiple sclerosis, but it is more severe and usually happens as a one-off. Some patients are left with long-term disability; others can make a good recovery."
The cases add to concerns about the long-term health effects of Covid-19, which have left some patients (https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/health-family/covid-19-post-coronavirus-syndrome-is-absolutely-a-real-thing-1.4286521) breathless and fatigued long after they have cleared the virus, and others with numbness, weakness and memory problems.

One coronavirus patient described in the paper, a 55-year-old woman with no history of psychiatric illness, began to behave oddly the day after she was discharged from hospital. She repeatedly put her coat on and took it off again and began to hallucinate, reporting that she saw monkeys and lions in her house. She was readmitted to hospital and gradually improved on antipsychotic medication.

Another woman, aged 47, was admitted to hospital with a headache and numbness in her right hand a week after a cough and fever came on. She later became drowsy and unresponsive and required an emergency operation to remove part of her skull to relieve pressure on her swollen brain.
"We want clinicians around the world to be alert to these complications of coronavirus," Zandi says. He is urging physicians, GPs and healthcare workers with patients with cognitive symptoms, memory problems, fatigue, numbness or weakness to discuss the case with neurologists.

"The message is not to put that all down to the recovery, and the psychological aspects of recovery," he says.

"The brain does appear to be involved in this illness."
The full range of brain disorders caused by Covid-19 may not have been picked up yet, because many patients in hospitals are too sick to examine in brain scanners or with other procedures. "What we really need now is better research to look at what's really going on in the brain," Zandi says.

One concern is that the virus could leave a minority of people with subtle brain damage that becomes apparent only in years to come. This may have happened in the wake of the 1918 flu pandemic, when up to a million people appeared to develop brain disease.
"It's a concern if some hidden epidemic could occur after Covid where you're going to see delayed effects on the brain," Zandi says. "But it's far too early for us to judge now. We hope, obviously, that that's not going to happen, but when you've got such a big pandemic affecting such a vast proportion of the population it's something we need to be alert to."
David Strain, a senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter medical school, says that only a small number of patients appear to experience serious neurological complications and that more work is needed to understand their prevalence.
"This is very important as we start to prepare post-Covid-19 rehabilitation programs," he says.

"We've already seen that some people with Covid-19 may need a long rehabilitation period, both physical rehabilitation, such as exercise, and brain rehabilitation. We need to understand more about the impact of this infection on the brain."
- The Guardian

Related:

Nearly half of severe COVID-19 cases showed neurological symptoms (https://www.sott.net/article/432367-Nearly-half-of-severe-COVID-19-cases-showed-neurological-symptoms)



Brain-virus? Young Covid-19 victims suffer psychosis, fatigue and anxiety side-effects - or is it just all in the mind? (https://www.sott.net/article/436536-Brain-virus-Young-Covid-19-victims-suffer-psychosis-fatigue-and-anxiety-side-effects-or-is-it-just-all-in-the-mind)



How does coronavirus kill? Tracing the ferocious rampage through the body, brain to toes (https://www.sott.net/article/433746-How-does-coronavirus-kill-Tracing-the-ferocious-rampage-through-the-body-brain-to-toes)



Coronavirus has signs of being man-made - Czech Geneticist (https://www.sott.net/article/431880-Coronavirus-has-signs-of-being-man-made-Czech-Geneticist)



Man-made: COVID-19 virus has properties that have never been found in nature before (https://www.sott.net/article/436038-Man-made-COVID-19-virus-has-properties-that-have-never-been-found-in-nature-before)



"Like it was designed to infect humans": COVID-19 'cell culture' theory gains steam (https://www.sott.net/article/435150-Like-it-was-designed-to-infect-humans-COVID-19-cell-culture-theory-gains-steam)



What seems unnatural about COVID-19 (SARS CoV-2)? (https://www.sott.net/article/431774-What-seems-unnatural-about-COVID-19-SARS-CoV-2)Did COVID-19 escape Fort Detrick vaccine trial? Evidence that virus originated in US bioweapons lab (https://www.sott.net/article/431324-Did-COVID-19-escape-Fort-Detrick-vaccine-trial-Evidence-that-virus-originated-in-US-bioweapons-lab)



Nearly 30% of Americans think COVID-19 was created in lab - Pew poll (https://www.sott.net/article/432456-Nearly-30-of-Americans-think-COVID-19-was-created-in-lab-Pew-poll)

--------------------------------------------------------

One wonders if these ADEMs' causes are a redirection towards Covid-19 to cover up the damages done by vaccines... see Dr. Andrew Moulden's evidence (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283854&viewfull=1#post1283854). In either case, the real culprits are blood clots.

[Gwin Ru]

[...]

Fort Detrick and Mind Control
In parallel to researching and designing biological weapons, Fort Detrick is heavily involved in mind control (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=electro-shock&f=false). Beginning after WW2, the methods included the use of various drugs (heroin, mescaline, LSD, MDMA, synthetic THC and morphine), polygraph, electro-shock therapy, the use of "mechanical aids" , lobotomies, hypnotism, fatigue, isolation, sensory deprivation, and torture.

MKULTRA is the best known mind control program because of the revelations about the horrific experiments conducted by Sydney Gottlieb (https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/15/cia-fort-detrick-stephen-kinzer-228109), CIA chemist and head of some mind control experiments in Fort Detrick, and Dr. Ewen Cameron (https://www.wbur.org/endlessthread/2020/05/08/madness-part-three-subproject) from the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. But this was only the tip of the iceberg; the exposed experiments were only part of sub-project 68, one of 144 sub-projects contained in MKULTRA.

MKULTRA branched into many additional "avenues (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=avenues&f=false) of control of human behavior, including radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and materials."


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574199/large/7ec52b1b847e0f9deb4324356f7b66.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/574199/full/7ec52b1b847e0f9deb4324356f7b66.jpg)
A young girl subjected to MKULTRA experiments


Following the exposure of sub-project 68, MKULTRA was officially discontinued in 1964. The truth is that it didn't end in 1964; it was merely re-labelled Project MKSEARCH (https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/dec/14/cia-mkultra-lies/).

In addition, MKULTRA was only one of numerous programs dedicated to mind control; other known programs are ARTICHOKE, Bluebird, QKHILLTOP, Chemical Corps, MKNAOMI, MKSHADE. All were dedicated to 'understanding' the human mind and finding all possible ways to control it.

The ultimate goal of mind control experiments conducted at Fort Detrick and its myriad satellite organizations (laboratories, hospitals, biotech companies, pharmaceutical companies, and prisons) was best captured in 1952, when Paul Gaynor, head of the CIA Security Research Service, described the purpose (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=self-preservation&f=false) of ARTICHOKE:
[Gaynor] posed the project's ultimate question to the CIA's Medical Office chief: "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against such fundamental laws of nature [like] self-preservation? The two main research topics in Fort Detrick, namely biological weapons and mind control were not compartmentalized. By the very admission (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjIiPXIiKLqAhXFzYUKHbakBbAQ6AEwAHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=employment%20in%20clandestine%20operations&f=false) of the CIA to the U.S. Justice Department during the 1975 investigation, MKULTRA, centered around Fort Detrick, associated biological materials and mind control:
[MKULTRA] activities that were concerned with the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior. This association is confirmed by documentation of experiments associating infectious disease and human behavior, conducted as early as 1959:
Milwaukee (AP) - The CIA recruited University of Wisconsin scientists for two experiments between 1959 and 1962, the Milwaukee Journal reported in today's edition. Documents obtained by the newspaper indicate university administrators may not have been informed of CIA involvement in the research projects. However, the documents show researchers knew about CIA sponsorship and the objects of the research. The experiments involved Infectious disease and human behavior.

~ Glenn E. Tagatz, ENIGMA: A Veteran's Quest for Truth (https://books.google.fr/books/about/Enigma.html?id=YBhGngEACAAJ&redir_esc=y) Sydney Gottlieb was a PhD student under the supervision of Ira Baldwin at the University of Wisconsin. Dr Ira Baldwin (https://books.google.fr/books?id=Ov-0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hank+albarelli+a+terrible+mistake&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9uIT3kJjqAhXB6eAKHa9vBA8Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=snippet&q=wisconsin&f=false) would eventually chair the Department of Bacteriology at the university before becoming Fort Detrick's director of scientific research.

The above shows that the convergence between infectious diseases and human behavior research began more than 60 years ago. Since then both fields of research have made tremendous 'progress'.

A paper mentioned above describes viruses genetically modified to alter behavior, published in 2011 by a Rostock team. If a modest lab in Rostock could publicly publish a paper on a mind-altering engineered virus in 2011, you can imagine what Fort Detrick is able to secretly create nowadays.

Today, Fort Detrick thrives as the US army's principal base for biological research and mind control, employing nearly 8,000 people (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Detrick) in 600 buildings on 13,000 acres. Over the last 70 years it has invested billions of dollars in mind control and engineered viruses.
[...]When the above is combined with the following from Richard Dolan's research:

By the early 1970s, there were already means available to alter the moods of unsuspecting persons. A pocket-sized transmitter generating electromagnetic energy at less than 100 milliwatts could do the job.

This is no pie-in-the-sky theory: In 1972, Dr. Gordon J.F. McDonald testified before the House Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment on the issue of electromagnetic weapons used for mind control and mental disruption. He stated:
[T]he basic notion was to create, between the electrically charged ionosphere in the higher part of the atmosphere and conducting layers of the surface of the Earth, this neutral cavity, to create waves, electrical waves that would be tuned to the brain waves. …About ten cycles per second. …You can produce changes in behavioral patterns or in responses.
The following year, Dr. Joseph C. Sharp, at Walter Reed Hospital, while in a soundproof room, was able to hear spoken words broadcast by ‘pulsed microwave audiogram.’ These words were broadcast to him without any implanted electronic translation device. Rather, they reached him by direct transmission to the brain. [Dolan]
... one wonders if "they" managed to tune some viruses to microwaves broadcasted from satellites... that would explain the increased beachings of whales and dolphins or entire herds of elephants dying of heart attacks... as well as why isolated individuals "catch" the corona virus when the rest of their family don't (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111468-What-s-wrong-with-me&p=1365959&viewfull=1#post1365959) because not "attuned" to the beaming?

[Gwin Ru]

[...]
... one wonders if "they" managed to tune some viruses to microwaves broadcasted from satellites... that would explain the increased beachings of whales and dolphins or entire herds of elephants dying of heart attacks... as well as why isolated individuals "catch" the corona virus when the rest of their family don't (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111468-What-s-wrong-with-me&p=1365959&viewfull=1#post1365959) because not "attuned" to the beaming?
Thanks to Norman (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111045-Gregory-Joseph-Hallett-the-real-king-of-England.-Explosive-Stuff-&p=1366581&viewfull=1#post1366581) who linked to an article and mp3 which indicate that the research into remote controlling bacteria, etc. via wireless started in 1926... here is an excerpt of that article (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2020-06-10T12:19:00-07:00&max-results=7):
In 1962, RCA/NBC president David Sarnoff awarded his RCA engineer spy Robert I. Lieber (https://aim4truth.org/2020/03/28/charles-m-lieber-and-the-queens-qinetiq/) the 1962 David Sarnoff Outstanding Achievement Award in Engineering (https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1962-04-01-Robert-I-Lieber-(R-Lieber)-Apr-May-1963-1962-David-Sarnoff-Outstdng-Achievmnt-Awrd-in-Engng-Sys-Eng-Moorestown-Missle-and-Surface-Radar-Div-Def-Elect-Prods-Moorestown.pdf) for his work in the Systems Engineering, Moorestown Missile and Surface Radar Division, Defense Electronic Products, Moorestown, NJ. Lieber's work laid down the bases for the current AEGIS global satellite warfare system. AEGIS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis_Ballistic_Missile_Defense_System) is an integral component of the 5G weaponization plans for the "aggressive remote control of all things (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/01/meet-geek-who-can-remotely-crash-planes.html)."


https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/lieber-charles-m.jpg (https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/lieber-charles-m.jpg)
Fig. 45—Charles M. Lieber. (Accessed Mar. 19, 2020) (https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2020-03-19-Charles-M-Lieber-Biography-Principal-Investigator-Chemistry-and-Chemical-Biology-Department-School-of-Engineering-and-Applied-Sciences-Harvard-University-accessed-Mar-19-2020.pdf). Biography, Lieber Research Group, Principal Investigator. Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Harvard University. (Includes a long list of conspirator companies and individuals.)


In Part Three of this report we focus on Charles M. Lieber who is currently out on $1 million cash bail after his arrest on Jan. 28, 2020 in Boston. Charles is very evidently the RCA et al research cardboard cutout to control all of the patents for carbon nanotube, nanowire and nanopore inventions. Charles Lieber represents the Pilgrims Society's shift of focus to consolidating patents under a single person who then assigns all their rights to Pilgrims Society corporations and institutions like Harvard and Oxford.

In, 1994, Robert Lieber's son, Harvard professor Charles M. Lieber (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2020/03/weaponized-coronavirus-is-anglo.html#lieber-harvard-traitor) began filing the first of 65 patents in carbon nanotube, nanowire and nanopore technologies used in the DoD Office of Net Assessment's weaponization of Lieber's nanotubes as a bioweapon vehicle for the mass distribution of viral weapons like Coronavirus.

Charles M. Lieber completely concealed his father Robert's work as a C.I.A. operative for David Sarnoff, RCA and NBC as he was being awarded $100's of millions in government contracts to corner the intellectual property space regarding carbon nano technology for which he was exclusively funded by DARPA, NIH, C.I.A. MITRE, Army, Navy, Air Force, Harvard and NSF. These agency are the very same agencies that funded RCA Research historically.

Tellingly, "The IBM Internet of Things" patents are all filed under a lone inventor Richard C. Walker, whose real identity appears to be Professor James P. Chandler. See Meet The Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes And Can Your Mind (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/01/meet-geek-who-can-remotely-crash-planes.html).

Here's a teaser for what's coming on "Nano Man" Harvard Professor Charles M. Lieber:
The subject matter of Lieber’s 65 patents telegraphs a truly frightening biowarfare agenda and his obvious status as a "cardboard cutout" for the Pilgrims Society:

Charles M. Lieber Funder: -------Science Funded includes:
C.I.A. ---------------------------Synthesis of carbon graphene nanostructures

NSF ----------------------------Computer program and apparatus to collect and store data in nanowires

DARPA -------------------------High resolution nanosensors and related technology

NIH ----------------------------Nanopore sensing

U.S. Army Research -------------Nanowire ballistic properties

MITRE Corporation --------------Bent nanowires and related probing of species, incl. cell membranes

DoD Naval Research ------------Nanoscale wires for data storage

U.S. Air Force ------------------Liquid films containing nanoscale wire sensors

DoD ---------------------------Nanowire strength

Harvard -----------------------Nanoscale transistors for biomolecular sensors
Lieber’s biographies are plastered on thousands of websites all over the world. Most notably Lieber, but also an obscure IBM researcher named Donald S. Bethune, are the most prominent figures in the fields of carbon nanotubes, nanowires and nanopores.

And yet, despite this deluge of information about Charles Lieber, he never mentions his family.

Indicted Harvard nano-scientist Charles M. Lieber investigations have taken an unexpected turn into Pilgrims Society pathogen biotechnology bankrolled by the Rothschilds.

David Sarnoff hired Charles’ father, Robert I. Lieber, to engineer radar, satellite and missile systems that could deliver microbe payloads according to Sarnoff's well-publicized 1926 dystopian vision of the "devastating consequences of new miracles in science"
Tellingly, the Wellcome Fund is today the largest donor to pharmaceutical research in the world (with Gates Foundation #2). Wellcome Fund is a primary funder of The Pirbright Institute (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2020/01/coronavirus-traced-to-british-crown.html) (his sponsor, Henry de Worms, 1st Baron Pirbright's [a Rothschild heir] donated the land).

The Pirbright Institute holds the patent on Coronavirus. The Institute is notorious for allowing the 2007 foot and mouth disease outbreak at Pirbright, after which they built a Merial Animal Health Institute in Nanchang, China (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2020/02/coronavirus-uncovers-rothschild-lord.html), just a four-hour drive from Wuhan, China.

Evidently, the Wellcome family legacy of testing and releasing deadly vaccines on humans started during the 2nd Boer War and carries on to this day.

Also on the Pirbright site today is Cobbet Hill Earthstation with satellite warfare-level capabilities. Henry de Worms (Rothschild), starting in the 1880's, helped establish the Marconi Wireless monopoly in Britain and worked as patent, commerce, trade and colonies minister to fuse Marconi wireless technology (stolen from Nikola Tesla) and Wellcome biological research into using radio transmissions to trigger viral outbreaks.

Today, 140 years later, de Worms (Rothschild)'s vision is finally coming true in 5G and nanotubes carrying deadly virus payloads (https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2020/03/weaponized-coronavirus-is-anglo.html#will-5g-exterminate-humanity). See Jun. 05, 1909 above.

[Gwin Ru]

Mystery: Argentine sailors infected with virus after 35 days at sea (https://www.france24.com/en/20200714-mystery-as-argentine-sailors-infected-with-virus-after-35-days-at-sea)

France 24 (https://www.france24.com/en/20200714-mystery-as-argentine-sailors-infected-with-virus-after-35-days-at-sea)
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 05:58 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s28/576649/large/1The_Echizen_Maru_fishing_traw.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s28/576649/full/1The_Echizen_Maru_fishing_traw.jpg)
© Eitan Abramovich AFP/File


The Echizen Maru fishing trawler returned to port in Ushuaia after some of its crew began exhibiting symptoms typical of COVID-19.

Argentina is trying to solve a medical mystery after 57 sailors were infected with the coronavirus after 35 days at sea, despite the entire crew testing negative before leaving port. The Echizen Maru fishing trawler returned to port after some of its crew began exhibiting symptoms typical of COVID-19, the health ministry for the southern Tierra del Fuego province said Monday.

According to the ministry, 57 sailors, out of 61 crew members, were diagnosed with the virus after undergoing a new test.

However, all of the crew members had undergone 14 days of mandatory quarantine at a hotel in the city of Ushuaia. Prior to that, they had negative results, the ministry said in a statement.

Two of the other sailors have tested negative, and two others are awaiting test results, the province's emergency operations committee said. Two sailors were hospitalized.

"It's hard to establish how this crew was infected, considering that for 35 days, they had no contact with dry land and that supplies were only brought in from the port of Ushuaia," said Alejandra Alfaro, the director of primary health care in Tierra del Fuego.

A team was examining "the chronology of symptoms in the crew to establish the chronology of contagion," she said.

The head of the infectious diseases department at Ushuaia Regional Hospital, Leandro Ballatore, said he believed this is a "case that escapes all description in publications, because an incubation period this long has not been described anywhere."

"We cannot yet explain how the symptoms appeared," said Ballatore.

The crew was placed in isolation on board the ship and returned to the port of Ushuaia.

Argentina exceeded 100,000 total cases on Sunday, and the death toll rose to 1,859. The majority of infections are in the Buenos Aires area.

----------------------------------------------------------

So... what's up with that? Could it possibly be a targeted beam activation such as the kind researched since 1926?

[Tam]

Targeted beam activation sounds like a bit of a stretch, imo. Not saying that it's impossible, but I'm applying Occam's razor here.

To me or sounds like either the tests were flawed in some way, meaning that as few as one or as many as 50 of the crew members were actually positive, or, that similar to HPV and other viruses, covid doesn't just leave your system after a few weeks, but instead goes dormant, then relapses for any number of reasons/factors. This explains why people are sick for months, or why some recover, only to get "reinfected" after a few weeks.

[Sarah Rainsong]

Targeted beam activation sounds like a bit of a stretch, imo. Not saying that it's impossible, but I'm applying Occam's razor here.

To me or sounds like either the tests were flawed in some way, meaning that as few as one or as many as 50 of the crew members were actually positive, or, that similar to HPV and other viruses, covid doesn't just leave your system after a few weeks, but instead goes dormant, then relapses for any number of reasons/factors. This explains why people are sick for months, or why some recover, only to get "reinfected" after a few weeks.

Also, if this virus has been in the population much more widespread and for much longer than the "official" story (originated in China in November/December 2019) then that makes something like this much more possible.

[Gwin Ru]

@ Tam: There you go: All stretched out :)


DARPA’s Cocktail Menu of Brave New World Human Control (https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/07/darpas-cocktail-menu-of-brave-new-world-human-control/)

Russ Winter (https://www.winterwatch.net/author/russ-winter/) Winter Watch Articles (https://www.winterwatch.net/category/winterwatcharticles/)
July 20, 2020 (https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/07/)


https://www.winterwatch.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/HAARP-facility-Alaska.jpg
Alaska's controversial HAARP facility closed down. Will it come back online?
PHOTO: Anchorage Daily News



The “natural person” — as opposed to some contrived invention called a “trans-human” — has a right to be left unmolested by Crime Syndicate psychopaths who are determined to drive them like herds to market and cram an agenda of political domination disguised as scientific “advancements” down their throat.


What stops them now from warring, stealing, exploiting, murdering, harassing, enslaving and dominating most of the human race? From having peace? NOTHING. And now we have this horrific marriage of the kakistocracy and technocracy.

One has to believe this process is well underway, particularly in environments that are more institutionalized and where individuals are already more corralled. Winter Watch suggests the best candidates for this new hybrid social structure are younger and have grown up with brainwashing. An older person is more hard wired on their outlook and language. Hardwired folks can be monitored, culled as necessary and allowed to die off, except for more problematic types. Die offs of the older can be facilitated by plandemics.

It should be safe to assume that these methods are both secret and more advanced than is generally recognized.

One of the current technologies works by directing radio signals on targeted individuals to stimulate specific areas of their brain. These low-density subtle energies have the affect of causing disruption to the body’s physiological integrity, resulting in mood changes such as high anxiety. The directed radio signals may also be used to alter decision making in order to manipulate a desired behavioral outcome.

And it’s not just specific individuals. The technology has been known to psycho-actively overwhelm and covertly control and manipulate entire civilian populations.

There is also the development of “anti-sleep” drugs to dampen emotional reactions to violence. At an unknown level of advancement are “neuro-weapons,” which are virus-transported molecules to addle the brain.

Research is being conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication at ASU and is entitled “Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects.” (http://csc.asu.edu/projects/) A detailed overview of the project can be found in the document.

Highlights include:


In phase 3 of the research, the research group will “selectively alter aspects of narrative structure and brain functions via Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (TMS) to induce or disrupt selected features of narrative processing.”



Once it is determined that disruption of certain portions of the brain can enhance persuasive messaging, individuals can be persuaded to do things they normally would not do and believe things they normally would not believe. This could include something as simple as telling a closely guarded secret, to believing in government propaganda, or even committing a violent act. The group writes on page 26,



“Once we have produced a narrative comprehension model [i.e. how individuals comprehend stories and persuasive messages], end users [aka the government] will understand how to activate known neural networks (e.g. working memory or attention) and positive behavioral outcome (e.g. nonviolent actions) nodes with strategic communication messages."DARPA last year received $65 million from American taxpayers to develop a way to plug a human brain directly into a computer. According to an announcement by DARPA, the project will create a way to “enable rich two-way communication with the brain at a scale that will help deepen our understanding of that organ’s underlying biology, complexity and function.”

In other words, the Crime Syndicate (CS) is taking money from taxpayers and using it to build a way to manipulate their brains, altering their senses —
“vision, hearing and speech” — in whatever way the CS deem beneficial. One of the first steps, DARPA reports, will be to create “an implantable package.” That is to say, a device that can be put directly into the brains of those selected for the sensory rewiring. One of the proposed interfaces will result in the development of “up to 100,000 untethered, submillimeter-sized ‘neurograin’ sensors implanted onto or into the cerebral cortex.”
Next up are micro-chipped pills. Not happy enough with monitoring our phone calls, computers and having a camera on us everywhere we go outside, the recently FDA-approved microchip in a pill will be the perfect excuse to place surveillance inside our bodies.

Could a remote-controlled digital-dosing and monitoring system have the affect of making its pill-taking citizens temperate and docile, if ever needed? Or could it be used to deliberately change our moods?

Former DARPA head Regina Dugan now leads special projects for the Google-owned Motorola Vitamin authentication. Dugan shows a pill that can be ingested and then battery powered with stomach acid to produce an 18-bit internal signal. After that, the swallower’s whole body becomes a password.

DARPA said in a press release that the new technology — called Restoring Active Memory, or RAM — will help design and “develop wireless, fully implantable neural-interface medical devices that can serve as ‘neuro-prosthetics.'” Such “memory restoration technologies” could be used to implant phony memories.

DARPA has begun a heavily funded project to “enhance human ability in war zones by altering the genetic code (recipe) of their soldiers.” The aim is to achieve battlefield supremacy by creating soldiers who lack empathy and are smarter, more focused and much stronger than their enemy counterparts. Variations can be used within the broader population, and probably already are.

Then we have the 5G rollout and EMF pollution.

The Schuman resonance frequency (7.83Hz) has been described as the Earth’s universal magnetic pulse. Experiments by Professor R. Wever (http://new-paradigm.ws/experiment-proves-staying-tune-earths-pulse-key-wellbeing/) showed that when subjects were kept underground and isolated from the Schuman resonance frequency, after a while, they developed a whole range of nervous system, hormonal and behavioral problems.

EMF’s and the related wireless technology interfere with the Schuman resonance and the body’s natural circadian rhythm. In humans, brain alpha waves are virtually identical to the Schuman resonance, needed for healthy function.

9k_ptxWsadI

Related:


Targeted Individuals: How to Stop Electronic Harassment via Nano Fungal Infection (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99857-Targeted-Individuals-experiences-problems-and-solutions&p=1198306&viewfull=1#post1198306)



Cal physicists make a radio 10,000 times thinner than a human hair (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?56010-MICRO-DRONES-surveillance-from-mechanical-insects-and-birds.-They-re-already-here.&p=638097&viewfull=1#post638097)

[Gwin Ru]

Working hard at it... but that's only the public domain...

Scientists pave way for new era of medicine by observing nanoparticles for 1st time (https://www.rt.com/news/495285-scientists-observe-single-nanoparticles-breakthrough/)

RT
20 Jul, 2020 14:30 / Updated 22 hours ago
Get short URL (https://on.rt.com/am5x)




https://cdni.rt.com/files/2020.07/article/5f159cfb203027616d542386.jpg
Illustration: © Getty Images / Coneyl Jay


Physicists have achieved a world first which could revolutionize the field of medicine by measuring and studying a single, twisted nanoparticle in isolation, paving the way for microscopic ‘labs’ to replace traditional drugs.

Researchers at the University of Bath employed a cutting-edge technique known as hyper-Rayleigh scattering optical activity (HRS OA) to examine gold particles at the nanoscale level, or somewhere in the region of 10,000 times smaller than a pinhead.

Using this technique, they were able to measure the gold particles’ chirality. This is the particular twist in a given material which cannot be superimposed on any other, making it unique. A person’s left hand cannot be superimposed on their right and therefore is chiral from the right hand. For example, depending on the material, this chirality might afford a citrus fruit molecule’s smell, clockwise for lemon, counterclockwise for orange.

https://cdni.rt.com/files/2020.07/original/5f15aa2e85f54037693a9a4c.png
Like left and right hands, chiral molecules have the same things attached in the same order, but are mirror images and not the same. Wikimedia Commons


“Chirality is one of the most fundamental properties of nature. It exists in sub-atomic particles, in molecules (DNA, proteins), in organs (the heart, the brain), in bio-materials (such as seashells), in storm clouds (tornadoes) and in the shape of galaxies (spirals hurtling through space),” elaborated lead researcher Professor Ventsislav Valev.
The ability to measure and study molecules at isolation and in the nanoscale has massive implications for everything from medicines, to our food and even pesticides.
“This is both a record and a milestone in nanotechnology,” Professor Valev added.
The technology, which employs laser pulses, can detect a single nanoparticle floating in a liquid. It’s hoped it could be used to help produce pharmaceuticals in an incredibly detailed and customizable way.

Nanoscale medicines developed using precise, minute amounts of ingredients would afford doctors the ability to more accurately treat specific illnesses and diseases in previously unfathomable ways.
“You’ll be able to go to the chemist with a prescription and instead of receiving a medicine that has to be mixed from bottles of chemicals and then stored in the fridge for several days, you’ll walk away with pills that are mini-labs. Upon cracking the pill, a precise number of micro-droplets will flow through microchannels to mix and produce the needed medicine,” Professor Valev explained.
Related:


‘Trojan Horse’: New nanoparticle can prevent heart attacks by 'eating' artery blockages FROM THE INSIDE (https://www.rt.com/usa/479400-scientists-trojan-horse-nanoparticle-cholesterol/)

[Gwin Ru]

Hitachi Develops World’s Smallest RFID Chip (https://thefutureofthings.com/3221-hitachi-develops-worlds-smallest-rfid-chip/)

The Japanese giant Hitachi has developed the world’s smallest and thinnest Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip. Measuring only 0.15 x 0.15 millimeters in size and 7.5 micrometers thick, the wireless chip is a smaller version of the previous record holder – Hitachi’s 0.4 x 0.4 mm “Micro-Chip”. The company used semiconductor miniaturization and electron beam technology to write data on the chip substrates to achieve this decrease in size. The new chips have a wide range of potential applications from military to transportation, logistics and even consumer electronics. Hitachi’s new line of rfid chips are also built with VPN enabled technology (https://toptip.co.kr/best-vpn/).


https://thefutureofthings.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/hitachi-smallest-rfid2.jpg


Nicknamed “Powder” or “Dust”, these chips consist of 128-bit ROM (Read Only Memory) that can store a 38-digit number. Hitachi says the distance between each circuit element was reduced using the Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_on_insulator) process, where an insulation layer and a monocrystalline silicon layer are formed upon the silicon base substrate, and the transistor is then formed on this SOI substrate. When compared to the conventional process where a transistor is formed directly upon the silicon substrate, this technology significantly reduces parasitic capacitance and current leakage, improving the transistor’s performance. The SOI process also prevents the interference between neighboring devices, which often causes product malfunctions.

Thanks to an insulator surrounding each device, Hitachi (http://www.hitachi.com/) experts say that even when the devices are in close proximity, higher integration is achieved on an even smaller area. The surface area of the new chips was reduced to a quarter of the original 0.3 x 0.3 mm, 60µm-thick chip developed by Hitachi in 2003. The company says that developments in thin chip fabrication technology enabled the significant decrease in width – to one-eighth of that of the previous model. With more chips that can be fabricated on a single wafer, productivity was increased by over four times, and Hitachi expects this will open the way to new applications for wireless RFID chips. The µ-Chip uses an external antenna to receive radio waves, which can be transformed and wirelessly transmitted as a unique ID number.

The data is written during the fabrication process, using ROM, and is therefore non-rewritable, providing a high level of authenticity. “By taking advantage of the merits of compactness, high authenticity and wireless communication, and combining it with Internet technology, the µ-Chip may be utilized in a broad range of applications such as security, transportation, amusement, traceability and logistics” – said Hitachi engineers who worked on the project. Hitachi is continuing to develop technologies that increase communication’s distance range and decrease antenna size, whilst preserving high reliability and aiming for improved productivity. The company said that the enhanced compactness and thinness of the new chip has further broadened the range of possible applications, including gift certificates that can be authenticated. The new RFID “powder” (http://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/060206.html) can also be incorporated into thin paper, such as currency, creating so-called “bugged” money.


https://thefutureofthings.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/hitachi_rfid.jpg


Miniature RFID chips may also have advanced military applications such as smartdust. Smartdust is the concept of wireless MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) sensors that can detect anything from light and temperature to vibrations. Using a large amount of sensors is not a new concept – the U.S. military experimented with this idea already during the Vietnam War (Operation Igloo White (http://www.afa.org/magazine/Nov2004/1104igloo.asp)). While the older sensors were relatively large and only somewhat effective, Professor Christopher Pister from UC Berkeley suggested in 2001 to create a new type of micro sensor that could theoretically be as small as a grain of sand. Research into this idea is ongoing and is being funded by DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency).

What was only a theoretical concept in 2001 has now become a reality with the latest development by Hitachi, and could find its way to intelligence agencies across the world. RFID chips are also a source for increasing controversy surrounding issues of privacy. An RFID chip can be used to track the location of unsuspecting individuals who have bought products that include RFID tags in their package. Having miniature cheap RFID chips, such as those developed by Hitachi, implanted inside anything we buy might make many people feel very uncomfortable. However, big businesses believe that consumers’ fears are dwarfed by the benefits of RFID chips, which include reduced theft, digital real time inventory, and better information on consumer shopping habits. This tech is now actively used in automatic dog feeders with RFID tags to feed multiple dogs (https://fuzzyrescue.org/best-automatic-dog-feeders/) at a schedule. The feeder identifies the dog with the unique RFID chip and dispenses the food. Multiple dogs in a house are fed even in the absence of dog owner.

TFOT looked at several RFID related technologies including HP’s Memory Spot (https://thefutureofthings.com/articles/27/hp-s-memory-spot-chip-is-spot-on.html) Chip, which is some what similar to RFID technology (although there are also some important differences), The RFID Loc8tor (https://thefutureofthings.com/5332-rfid-loc8tor/) that can identify special RFID tags from a distance of up to 183 meters (600 feet), and a new Nanobattery (https://thefutureofthings.com/3059-nanobatteries-stop-exploding-batteries/) technology developed at the Tel Aviv University, which could power semi-active RFID chips in the future. Hitachi is constantly developing new and advanced chips. After publishing the information regarding the 0.15 x 0.15 millimeter RFID chip back in 2006 (http://hitachi.com/New/cnews/060206.html), the company apparently completed working on the improved RFID chip in early 2007. According to the Nikkei website (http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20070220/127959/), Hitachi is now planning on developing an even smaller RFID chip using 65-nanometer lithographic technology.

[Gwin Ru]

From Fort Detrick to Wuhan: Dr. Judy Mikovits


yaZefpbKj2cE

[Gwin Ru]

New data leak from the Pentagon biolaboratory in Georgia (http://armswatch.com/new-data-leak-from-the-pentagon-biolaboratory-in-georgia/)

Dilyana Gaytandzhieva Arms Watch (http://armswatch.com/new-data-leak-from-the-pentagon-biolaboratory-in-georgia/)
Sun, 06 Sep 2020 20:56 UTC


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582263/large/Lugar_Center_696x392.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582263/full/Lugar_Center_696x392.jpg)
The Lugar Center is a $161 million Pentagon-funded biolaboratory in Georgia’s capital Tbilisi © Dilyana Gaytandzhieva


Leaked e-mails between the Lugar Center, the Pentagon biolaboratory in Tbilisi, the US Embassy to Georgia and the Georgian Ministry of Health reveal new information about the $161 million (https://govtribe.com/award/federal-contract-award/delivery-order-hdtra108d0008-0002) secretive US Government biological research program in this former Soviet country.

The data allegedly originating from the Ministry of Health of Georgia has been published anonymously on Twitter and on a forum for database leaks - Raidforums. Among the documents there are internal memos, official letters and detailed information about US government projects at the Lugar Center, funding and foreign business trips.

Arms Watch volunteers have analyzed the leaked data and discovered very interesting facts about the Center's recent activities.

The Pentagon has planned to turn Georgia into its largest biological research center overseas, combining its military resources with the resources of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Georgia.

Furthermore, the number of US projects and grants have increased as well as the number of US scientists deployed to the Lugar Center. The Pentagon-funded facility is planned to temporarily accommodate 16 CDC specialists from Atlanta, for whom Georgia will build a separate BSL-2 laboratory, administrative building and a campus near the Lugar Center. In addition, Georgia will become a regional CDC hub for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, internal documents reveal.

The Lugar Center already sparked controversy about possible dual-use research in 2018 when leaked documents (http://dilyana.bg/us-diplomats-involved-in-trafficking-of-human-blood-and-pathogens-for-secret-military-program/) revealed that US diplomats in Georgia were involved in the trafficking of frozen human blood and pathogens for a secret military program.

The Lugar Center is just one of the many Pentagon biolaboratories in 25 countries (http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/) across the world. They are funded by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under a $ 2.1 billion military program - Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP) (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R43143.pdf), and are located in former Soviet Union countries such as Georgia (the motherland of former Soviet leader Joseph Stalin) and Ukraine, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa.

Pentagon research on bioterrorism agents at the Lugar Center

US military scientists have been deployed to Georgia for research on bioterrorism agents at the Lugar Center, according to the new data leak. These bio-agents (https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist-category.asp) have the potential to be aerosolized and used as bioweapons. Among them anthrax, tularemia, Brucella, Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, Hantavirus, Y. pestis (causing the disease plague).

The US military biological research projects in Georgia have been funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). According to internal data, American and Georgian scientists are currently working on the following DTRA projects in the Lugar Center:

Project 1059: Zoonotic Infections with Fever and Skin Injuries in Georgia

The project includes isolation of new orthopoxviruses in humans, rodents, domestic and wild animals in Georgia, and collection of rodents (as a natural reservoir for this virus) for their further study.

Duration: 01/11/2015-31/10/2018 (extended to 2020)

Funding: $702,343

Project 1060: Characterization of the Georgian National Center for Disease Control (NCDC) Strain Repository by New Generation Sequencing

Description: characterization and genome research on 100 strains from four endemic species: Y. pestis (causing the disease plague), B. anthracis (anthrax), Brucella, and F. tularensis (causing the disease tularemia).

Duration: 01/11/2015-31/10/2018

Funding: $ 518,409

Project 1439: Molecular Virological Research in Georgia

Description and objectives:

Identify and characterize Hantavirus and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) strains by molecular methods;Characterize and study genetic diversity of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and hantavirus strains isolated from rodents and ectoparasites;



Serological examination of febrile patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome;



Collection of rodents and ectoparasites (ticks, fleas);

Duration: 16/08/2017-15/08/2021

Funding: $612,614

Project 1497: Molecular Epidemiology and Ecology of Yersinia Species in Georgia and Azerbaijan

Description:
1) Ecological research on rodents in Kerb on the Georgian-Azerbaijani border

2) Isolation of different strains of Yersinia;

3) Molecular screening of collected rodent and flea samples.

4) A comparative analysis of the genomes of Yersinia strains obtained during the fieldwork;

5) Spatial analysis of the distribution of Yersinia strains.
Duration: 01/09/2017-31/08/2018 (extended to 2022)

Funding: $134,090.00

Project 1742: Risks of bat-borne zoonotic diseases in Western Asia

Duration: 24/10/2018-23 /10/2019

Funding: $71,500


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582264/large/EcoHealth_Alliance_Project_102.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582264/full/EcoHealth_Alliance_Project_102.jpg)


In 2017 the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) launched a $6.5 million project on bats and coronaviruses (https://www.usaspending.gov/#/award/ASST_NON_HDTRA11710064_9761) in Western Asia (Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Jordan) with the Lugar Center being the local laboratory for this genetic research. The duration of the program is 5 years and has been implemented by the non-profit US organisation Eco Health Alliance. (https://www.wabnet.org/research/coronavirus-project/)

The project's objectives are:
1. Capture and non-lethally sample 5,000 bats in 5-year period (2017-2022)

2. Collect 20,000 samples (i.e. oral, rectal swabs and/or feces, and blood) and screen for coronaviruses using consensus PCR at regional labs in Georgia and Jordan.
According to the project presentation (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328676300_Bats_and_Viruses_in_Western_Asia_A_Model_for_One_Health_Surveillance_using_Research_Networ ks), Eco Health Alliance already sampled 270 bats of 9 species in three Western Asian countries: 90 individual bats in Turkey (Aug 2018), Georgia (Sept 2018), and Jordan (Oct 2018).


https://www.facebook.com/ksidamonidze/videos/10158498942329691/


EcoHealth Alliance and Georgian scientists sampling a bat (https://www.facebook.com/847064690/videos/pcb.10158498937989691/10158498942329691) for coronavirus research in 2018 (Facebook, Keti Sidamonidze)


Coincidentally, the same Pentagon contractor tasked with the US DoD bat-research program - Eco Health Alliance, USA, also collected bats and isolated coronaviruses along with Chinese scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. EcoHealth Alliance received a $3.7 million grant (https://taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/AwardDetail?arg_AwardNum=R01AI110964&arg_ProgOfficeCode=104) from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to collect and study coronaviruses in bats in China from 2014 to 2019.

Project 1911: Ricketsia and Coxelia infection surveillance in Georgia and Azerbaijan (US federal grant HDTRA1-19-1-0042 (https://govtribe.com/award/federal-grant-award/project-grant-hdtra11910042) awarded to NCDC-Georgia)

Duration: 23/09/2019 - 22/09/2022

Funding: $945,000

Despite the official claims of Georgia and USA that the Lugar Center is under the full control of the government of this Caucasus country, internal documents show otherwise. Not only has the Pentagon funded biological research projects but it has also paid all the expenses for security and maintenance including utility bills - water, gas, electricity, and cleaning. Tasked with the operational and scientific support to the Lugar Center is USAMRU-Georgia, a special unit deployed to Georgia by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR). WRAIR has paid: $524,625 (2016-2018), $650,000 (2017-2019) and $1,062,400 (2017-2021) for utility bills, and a further $158,050 (2016-2017) and $322,000 (2018-2021) for security guards.

The Pentagon has also awarded a private US contractor, Technology Management Company (TMC) an $8 million contract (https://govtribe.com/award/federal-idv-award/indefinite-delivery-contract-w81xwh16d0022) for science services to support USAMRU-Georgia in the Lugar Center (2016-2021).

Tularemia research on soldiers

The Pentagon unit USAMRU-Georgia has conducted extensive research on tularemia involving Georgian soldiers, scientific papers (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453017/) reveal.

Tularemia is a rare infectious disease that typically attacks the skin, eyes, lymph nodes and lungs. Tularemia, also called rabbit fever or deer fly fever, is caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis. It is categorized as a category A bioterrorism agent (https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist-category.asp). Tularemia was weaponized for mass aerosol dissemination by the US Army in the past, according to a recently declassified military report.


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582266/large/tularemia.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582266/full/tularemia.jpg)

900 volunteers (soldiers and civilians) were recruited for the DTRA project GG-19 (https://ncdc.ge/Handlers/GetFile.ashx?ID=af53c8f1-7461-41b2-b5ff-89140c6e2188) "Epidemiology and Ecology of Tularemia in Georgia" from 2014 to 2017. Blood samples were collected from those volunteers and tested for tularemia.

According to the study, 10 soldiers (2%) of the 500 solders tested had antibodies for F. tularensis. The seropositive soldiers were men, the majority of whom were between 30 and 39 years of age. Seven cases had current residences in known endemic areas (i.e. Kakheti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Kvemo Kartli, Shida Kartli, and Tbilisi). Three were from areas without previously known F. tularensis transmission (i.e. Imereti).

Of the 783 residents approached to participate in this study, 35 (5.0%) volunteers had antibodies to F. tularensis.

While the civilian volunteers were all residents of two areas with naturally occurring foci of tularemia in Georgia, the military personnel were soldiers visiting Georgia's military hospital. The study does not provide any explanation as to why soldiers were enrolled in this project nor how exactly they contracted the disease in the army.

Furthermore, Georgia has asked the US Embassy for assistance for the construction of a second military hospital in the country, according to leaked correspondence between local health officials and the US Embassy to Tbilisi.

Below is Google translation in English of this correspondence:


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582267/large/Translation.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582267/full/Translation.jpg)


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582268/large/Translation_page1.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582268/full/Translation_page1.jpg)

CDC regional hub
The US Government has launched a parallel civil program in Georgia implemented by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Leaked e-mails between the US Embassy to Tbilisi and Georgian health officials reveal that CDC has planned to set up a regional office for Eastern Europe and Central Asia in Georgia. The US Embassy and CDC have requested additional office space for 16 employees. Currently the CDC staff are working inside the Lugar Center.

Interestingly, the Georgian health officials do not ask about any further information or clarification as to what this new foreign hub is going to do in their own country. Instead, Georgia's Ministry of Health has planned the construction of a new BSL-2 laboratory, conference hall and campus near the Lugar Center with a loan from the European Investment Bank, according to a letter to the finance minister of Georgia leaked on Raidforums.


https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582269/large/Capture2.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/582269/full/Capture2.jpg)

Arms Watch could not independently verify the authenticity of this letter as we did not find it in the leaked files. We have further analyzed the ministry's internal data and discovered the following CDC projects in Georgia:

Project 1320: Antimicrobial Resistance Project

Duration: 01/09/2016 -29/09/2020

Funding: $153,492.40

Project 1440: Introducing or Expanding the Use of Influenza Vaccine Outside the United States

Duration: 30/09/2016 - 29/09/2019

Funding: $750,000

Project 1441: Influenza Surveillance Outside the United States

Duration: 30/09 / 16-29 / 09/21

Funding: $250,000

Project 1446: Strengthening New Generation Sequencing Capacities for Hepatitis C Surveillance in Georgia

Duration: 01/07/2017-30 /06/2018

Funding: $22,000

Project 1447: Samples collection under the Hepatitis C Elimination Program in Georgia - Bio-Bank

Objective: The aim of the project is to store samples collected under the Hepatitis C program for future scientific work

20,000 plasma/serum samples



6,000 serum samples from the 2015 National Seroprevalence Survey of Hepatitis C and B



1,000 blood samples from blood banks



500 blood samples from patients with terminal liver disease

Duration: 01/07/2017-30/06/2018

Project 1456: Strengthening the micronutrient deficit monitoring system in Georgia

Duration: 01/09/2017 - 31/08/2018

Funding: $92,875

Project 1457: Genetic peculiarities of hepatitis C virus in Georgia and its role in the Georgian Hepatitis C elimination program

Objective: Evaluate morbidity and mortality associated with Hepatitis C virus

Duration: 01/09/2017-31/08/2018

Funding: $127,125

Project 1532: Strengthening, detection, response and prevention of diarrhea outbreaks in Georgia

Duration: 30/09/2017 -29/09/2020

Funding: $40,000

Project 1533: Strengthening Immunization and Vaccination Control System

Duration: 30/09/2017 - 29/09/2020

Funding: $67,220.00

Project 1534: Respiratory Disease Surveillance

Duration: 30/09/2017 - 29/09/2020

Funding: $80,000.00

Project 1535: Enterovirus surveillance Georgia

Duration: 30/09/2017 -29/ 09/2020

Funding: $45,000

Project 1536: National Laboratory Quality Control Program in Georgia

Duration: 30/09/2017 -29 /09/2020

Funding: $56,140

Project 1537: South Caucasus Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program

Duration: 30/09/2017 -29 /09/2020

Funding: $150,000

Project 1538: Fever of unknown etiology caused by arboviruses in the Black Sea region - clinical specimens will be shipped to the CDC Laboratory for analyses

Duration: 30/09/2017 - 29/09/2020

Funding: $100,360

In conclusion, the United States has been consistently developing its laboratory facilities in the Caucasus. Why has the US Government spent billions of dollars on such biolaboratories and projects abroad instead on the health of its own citizens?

Furthermore, why have US scientists working at the Lugar Center been given diplomatic status and immunity (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8hQi2Zv1L0&t=12s) to research deadly pathogens and insects in Georgia? Diplomatic immunity is a principle of international law by which foreign government officials are not subject to the jurisdiction of local courts and other authorities for their activities. Hence, US scientists could even perform illegal experiments in Georgia without being prosecuted as they have diplomatic immunity.

P.S. Arms Watch is currently analyzing all leaked data. Due to the large volume of information, we will publish more documents in another article soon. If you want to support Arms Watch, please go to the Donation (http://armswatch.com/donate/) page or Become Volunteer (http://armswatch.com/become-volunteer/). Thank you!

Related:


Flu Epidemic Emerged From U.S Bacteriologic Laboratory in Kramatorsk (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88508-Zika-virus-Microcephaly--shrunken-infant-brains--Aedes-mosquito-Brazil...-another-pandemic-hoax&p=1043161&viewfull=1#post1043161)



Lugar Bio Laboratory in Tbilisi Latest: It’s Getting Worse by the Day (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88508-Zika-virus-Microcephaly--shrunken-infant-brains--Aedes-mosquito-Brazil...-another-pandemic-hoax&p=1043289&viewfull=1#post1043289)



Ethnic-Specific Weapons: Leaked Documents Reveal US Diplomats in Georgia Trafficking Human Blood And Pathogens For Pentagon Biowarfare Laboratory (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?104333-Ethnic-Specific-Weapons-Leaked-Documents-Reveal-US-Diplomats-in-Georgia-Trafficking-Human-Blood-And-Pathogens-For-Pentagon-Biowarfare-Laboratory&p=1249144&viewfull=1#post1249144)

[Gwin Ru]

The USA Pays For Death of The Citizens of Georgia (https://fort-russ.com/2020/09/the-usa-pays-for-death-of-the-citizens-of-georgia/)


https://fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bioweapons-Georgia-750x430.jpg


FRN
By Cesare Lombroso
By Guest Author (https://fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)
Last updated Sep 7, 2020

By Cesare Lombroso – In September the unspecified hackers posted in Twitter social networking system a lot of documents proving that the USA performed the prohibited biological researches in Georgia

The Government of Georgia and US pharmaceutical company Gilead ignored the research of 249 cases of death of the patients participating in the project of testing the anti-Hepatitis C vaccine. Herewith several examined persons stopped to administer the “drugs” because of side effects at their own discretion.

According to the Ministry of Health of Georgia, 187.1 mln. US dollars worth of anti-Hepatitis C antiviral drugs have expired due to “cancellation of treatment, death of patients or other reasons”. Internal correspondence between the Government of Georgia and the US embassy in Tbilisi indicated that the “volunteers” participating in the vaccine trial died and that treatment for others was canceled without any reason.

It is worth reminding that the multi-year program for the elimination of Hepatitis C in Georgia was launched in 2015 by US pharmaceutical company Gilead in collaboration with the US Center for Disease Control and the Ministry of Health of Georgia. Under this agreement, Gilead will not be liable for any indirect, incidental or other damage, regardless of whether it is foreseeable or unforeseen, caused by a tort or conflict.
https://fort-russ.com/2020/09/the-usa-pays-for-death-of-the-citizens-of-georgia/

The detailed documents on hazardous biological research on humans may be found here (http://armswatch.com/new-data-leak-from-the-pentagon-biolaboratory-in-georgia/):
http://armswatch.com/new-data-leak-from-the-pentagon-biolaboratory-in-georgia/

[onawah]

Bioweapon Labs Get More NIH Funding for Deadly 'Research'
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
September 29, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/09/29/bioweapon-labs-nih-funding-for-deadly-research.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art2ReadMore&cid=20200929Z1&mid=DM667075&rid=975743626

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
EcoHealth Alliance collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for years, collecting coronavirus samples from bats and manipulating it to jump to humans
The dangerous gain-of-function research was carried out via a grant awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
The grant was cut off in April 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic gained steam, and U.S. intelligence agencies started to look into whether the coronavirus that started it all escaped from a biological laboratory in Wuhan, China
In August 2020, however, the NIH pivoted, granting a new $7.5-million grant to EcoHealth Alliance — part of an $82-million award being split among 11 research teams looking into the origins of viruses and how they infect people
The controversial move means that EcoHealth Alliance’s work will continue, this time targeting Southeast Asia instead of China


EcoHealth Alliance, a corporate-funded nonprofit organization that seeks to uncover novel viruses in the environment, has been working in China for decades, trapping bats and looking for previously unknown coronaviruses that could lead to a global pandemic.1

This may come as a surprise to many, but even more surprising is the fact that the research was carried out via a grant awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).2

While the grant was initially supposed to continue through 2024, it was cut off in April 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic gained steam, and U.S. intelligence agencies started to look into whether the coronavirus that started it all escaped from a biological laboratory in Wuhan, China.3

EcoHealth Alliance collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for years, collecting coronavirus samples from bats and investigating whether they could jump to humans,4 and the NIH told the nonprofit that the project “no longer fit with NIH goals and priorities.”5

In August 2020, however, the NIH pivoted, granting a new $7.5 million grant to EcoHealth Alliance — part of an $82 million award being split among 11 research teams looking into the origins of viruses and how they infect people. The controversial move means that EcoHealth Alliance’s work will continue, this time targeting Southeast Asia instead of China.6

EcoHealth Alliance’s Controversial Gain-of-Function Research
Gain-of-function (GOF) research refers to studies that have the potential to enhance the ability of pathogens to cause disease, including enhancing either their pathogenicity or transmissibility.7 Such research is by its very nature controversial, since there are clear risks should the information be misused or the pathogens escape (or are maliciously released).

Further, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and virologist and Allison Wilson, Ph.D., a geneticist, believe gain-of-function research performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology played "an essential causative role in the pandemic."8 Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance president, however, said that the funding cut to their China bat research project would pose a threat to the U.S. public health.

"Once this pandemic is over, we know of hundreds of other coronaviruses that we've found evidence of in China that are waiting to emerge," Daszak said in an interview with NPR. "We are now going to be unable to know about the risk of that, which puts us completely at risk of the next pandemic."9

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is part of the NIH, has also long backed dangerous GOF coronavirus research, including that conducted by EcoHealth Alliance. According to Newsweek:10

"Just last year [2019], the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID], the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.

In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.

Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release."

Click here to read more
Daszak to Lead COVID-19 Task Force
Outrageously, Daszak has also been appointed to lead a task force examining whether COVID-19 may have leaked from a lab, as part of the Lancet Covid-19 Commission, which is looking into a variety of issues surrounding the pandemic and offering practical solutions.11 Part of the commission’s goal is to investigate the origins of COVID-19 and avert future zoonotic pandemics.

While Daszak said he would head the investigation with an open mind, critics such as Filippa Lentzos, an expert on biological threats at King’s College London, wrote on Twitter, “Goodness. I can't imagine a lead investigator with more vested interests!”12,13

Not only has Daszak been widely criticized for spreading misinformation surrounding the origins of COVID-19 previously, but his longtime collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been identified as the most probable source of a laboratory leak, is a glaring conflict of interest. If it’s found that COVID-19 did, in fact, leak from a lab, the work of Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance could come under fire, and future funding could be put in jeopardy.

As reported in GM Watch, “… if more scientists fail to speak out against his appointment as the Lancet Commission’s lead investigator, it will reflect the success of a censorship strategy that has not just allowed Daszak to evade serious scrutiny but to be put in charge of investigating himself and his associates.”14

Hundreds of Scientists Called for End of GOF Research in 2014
In 2014, a series of accidents at laboratories led to more than 300 scientists to launch a petition calling for an end to gain-of-function research.15 The U.S. issued a temporary pause as a result16 but, according to Ronnie Cummins, co-founder of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) and Alexis Baden-Mayer, OCA’s political director:

“Exemptions to this ‘pause,’ eventually reviewed by a secret government panel, were nonetheless allowed to go forward. The ban was lifted in 2017. Yet between 2014 and 2016, the NIH and Fauci-led NIAID continued funding gain-of-function research overseas at the Wuhan lab, via Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance.

Not surprisingly both Fauci and Daszak have been staunch defenders of the official Chinese government story that the virus that causes COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) ‘naturally’ evolved from bats and/or other host species to infect humans.”

In the NPR interview, Daszak said he really doesn’t understand the rationale behind the funding cut from NIH,17 as they were only researching how coronaviruses may spread from bats to people. But as Cummins and Baden-Mayer explained in my interview with them (linked above):

“Daszak and his collaborators at the Wuhan Institute of Virology18 weren’t just studying how coronavirus spread from bats to humans, they were actually making coronavirus capable of spreading from bats to humans. They were the first to create19 a bat coronavirus capable of directly infecting humans (rather than first needing to evolve in an intermediate animal host).

EcoHealth Alliance has since funded additional gain-of-function research that Daszak has championed — without acknowledging his connection.”

Bat Virus Made Capable of Infecting Human Airway Cells
In 2015, the University of North Carolina collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, performing gain-of-function research in which bat viruses were manipulated to create a chimeric virus capable of binding to human upper airway cells. That particular virus was called SHC014-MA15.20

EcoHealth Alliance had funded the research with a U.S. grant,21 but this wasn’t mentioned by Nature, which quoted Daszak as saying the findings “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger.”22 Cummins and Baden-Mayer pointed out the irony of this statement:

“Daszak’s statement is odd, as it seems obvious that it was the research itself that made the virus a clear and present danger, and that couldn’t be what he meant.

… Even the creators of the coronavirus-SARS chimaera questioned the wisdom of tinkering with viruses to make them more dangerous to humans. As Nature reported, in their paper the study authors conceded that funders may think twice about allowing such experiments in the future.”23

In my previously linked article, they added:

“‘Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue,’ they write, adding that discussion is needed as to ‘whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved.’”

NIH Conditions for Restoring Prior Grant Go Unmet
EcoHealth Alliance’s new grant is distinct from the previous grant that funded the Chinese bat research. The new grant is intended to fund the creation of the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases, or CREID, a network of centers focusing on different geographical regions.

EcoHealth Alliance will be conducting research on coronaviruses and other pathogens that may emerge from bats, rodents and primates in Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia.24 As for their earlier grant, the NIH notified EcoHealth Alliance that they may restore its funding for the Chinese research if they meet certain conditions, including the following:25

Obtain a sample of the SARS-COV-2 virus that the Wuhan lab used to determine its genetic sequence
Have independent scientists examine the Wuhan lab to determine if it had possession of SARS-COV-2 prior to December 2019
Determine the whereabouts of a Wuhan lab scientist whose photo was mysteriously removed from its website
According to NPR, “The scientist has been the focus of internet conspiracy theories suggesting she was in fact ‘patient zero’ for the coronavirus. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has previously said that the scientist in question was a graduate student who had finished her master's degree and moved on to other work.”26

EcoHealth Alliance has not met the conditions for the funding to be restored, with Daszak calling them “preposterous” and telling NPR, "I'm not trained as a private detective. It's not really my job to do that."27 The conditions do seem unusual, particularly for a U.S. government agency to be requesting of a nonprofit organization — unless, perhaps, they believe the organization knows something they don’t.

NIH Investigation Reveals Rampant Undisclosed Ties to China
The U.S. NIH is investigating 189 scientists from 87 institutions for undisclosed ties to foreign institutions, with 54 being fired or forced to resign as a result.28

Among them, 93% received undisclosed support from China, and many had active NIH grants while accepting foreign grants that were not disclosed. About 75% of those being investigated had received active NIH grants, and close to half had at least two of them. In all, 285 active grants totaling $164 million were counted among those being investigated.

Such ties are rampant, and 133, or 70%, of the researchers being investigated did not disclose to the NIH that they had received foreign grants. More than half (54%) also did not disclose their participation in a foreign talent program, while 9% hid ties to a foreign company and 4% did not disclose a foreign patent.29,30

The investigation is part of larger efforts to limit threats to the U.S. economy and national security, as cutting-edge technologies and other information at the forefront of new industries that is being supported by federally funded research could be flowing into the wrong hands.

A broader investigation is also ongoing, with NIH highlighting 399 scientists “of possible concern,” 121 of which the Federal Bureau of Investigation is also investigating.

According to Dr. Michael Lauer, NIH’s deputy director for extramural research, after the NIH looked into the scientists “of possible concern,” 63% of the investigations came back positive, revealing the true scope of the underhanded dealings.31

Meanwhile, Fauci, who also supported GOF research on bird flu viruses 10 years ago,32 continues to support EcoHealth Alliance and their research into novel diseases, noting in a statement about the latest grants, “The CREID network will enable early warnings of emerging diseases wherever they occur, which will be critical to rapid responses.”33

In reality, should further GOF research be allowed to continue, it’s possible that it could “seed” another pandemic.34 Admittedly, it’s quite a coincidence that the very viruses undergoing gain-of-function research turned out to be the ones causing pandemics.

Sources and References
1, 9, 17 NPR April 29, 2020
2, 5, 33 STAT News August 27, 2020
3 The Wall Street Journal April 16, 2020
4, 6, 24, 25, 26, 27 NPR August 29, 2020
7 National Institutes of Health, Gain of Function Research
8 Independent Science News July 15, 2020
10, 32 Newsweek April 28, 2020
11 Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement September 14, 2020
12 Twitter September 17, 2020
13, 14 GM Watch September 23, 2020
15 The Cambridge Working Group July 14, 2014
16 U.S. National Institutes of Health October 16, 2014
18 Nature October 20, 2013
19, 22, 23 Nature November 12, 2015
20 Nature April 6, 2016
21 Nature April 6, 2016, A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
28, 30, 31 Science June 12, 2020
29 NIH June 12, 2020
34 The New York Times December 19, 2017

[Delight]

Alien genes?


NOVEMBER 14, 2021 BY DR. ARIYANA LOVE
EPIGENETICS: Vaccines Are Deleting Human Genes & Transfecting Cells With Ebola/Marburg
By Dr. Ariyana Love

(Updated Nov. 23, 2021) (https://ambassadorlove.wordpress.com/2021/11/14/epigenetics-vaccines-are-deleting-human-genes-transfecting-cells-with-ebola-marburg/)The U.S. National Library of Medicine revealed something rather interesting. The USSR’s ‘invisible anthrax’ is a Gain-of-Function bioweapon created by introducing an “alien gene“ into Bacillus anthracis (bacteria). That’s how they made Anthrax. They used an alien gene and genetically altered bacterial immunological properties to produce a deadly pathogen to Humans. Where did they get an alien gene from? A UFO crash perhaps? Negotiations with other beings? Your guess is as good as mine.


EMBO Rep. 2003 Jun; 4(Suppl 1): S57–S60.
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor860
PMCID: PMC1326447
PMID: 12789409
Genetic engineering and biological weapons
Jan van Aken1 and Edward Hammond1
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC1326447/)

Rapid developments in biotechnology, genetics and genomics are undoubtedly creating a variety of environmental, ethical, political and social challenges for advanced societies. But they also have severe implications for international peace and security because they open up tremendous avenues for the creation of new biological weapons. The genetically engineered 'superbug'—highly lethal and resistant to environmental influence or any medical treatment—is only a small part of this story. Much more alarming, from an arms-control perspective, are the possibilities of developing completely novel weapons on the basis of knowledge provided by biomedical research—developments that are already taking place. Such weapons, designed for new types of conflicts and warfare scenarios, secret operations or sabotage activities, are not mere science fiction, but are increasingly becoming a reality that we have to face. Here, we provide a systematic overview of the possible impact of biotechnology on the development of biological weapons.

The history of biological warfare is nearly as old as the history of warfare itself. In ancient times, warring parties poisoned wells or used arrowheads with natural toxins. Mongol invaders catapulted plague victims into besieged cities, probably causing the first great plague epidemic in Europe, and British settlers distributed smallpox-infected blankets to native Americans. Indeed, the insights into the nature of infectious diseases gained by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch in the nineteenth century did not actually represent a great breakthrough in the use of infectious organisms as biological weapons. Similarly, the development of a bioweapon does not necessarily require genetic engineering—smallpox, plague and anthrax are deadly enough in their natural states. But the revolution in biotechnology, namely the new tools for analysing and specifically changing an organism's genetic material, has led to an increased risk of biowarfare due to several factors. First, the expansion of modern biotechnology in medical and pharmaceutical research and production has led to a worldwide availability of knowledge and facilities. Many countries and regions, where 30 years ago biotechnology merely meant brewing beer and baking bread, have established high-tech facilities for vaccine or single-cell-protein production that could be subverted for the production of biological weapons. Today, nearly all countries have the technological potential to produce large amounts of pathogenic microorganisms safely (Fig. 1). Second, classical biowarfare agents can be made much more efficiently than their natural counterparts, with even the simplest genetic techniques. Third, with modern biotechnology it becomes possible to create completely new biological weapons. And for technical and/or moral reasons, they might be more likely to be used than classical biowarfare agents. These possibilities have generated new military desires around the world, including within those countries that have publicly renounced biological weapons in the past. This paper deals predominantly with the last two factors, and with the use of real-life examples, we shall discuss the possibilities for such military abuse of biotechnology.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 4-embor860-f1.jpg
Figure 1
The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases in Fort Detrick, Maryland, is the centre of the USA's defensive research on biological weapons. (© (2001) Jan van Aken/Sunshine Project.)

By using genetic engineering, biological researchers have already developed new weapons that are much more effective than their natural counterparts. Countless examples from the daily work of molecular biologists could be presented here, not least the introduction of antibiotic resistance into bacterial pathogens, which today is routine work in almost any microbiology laboratory. Indeed, many research projects in basic science show—sometimes unwillingly and unwittingly—how to overcome current scientific and technological limits in the military use of pathogenic agents. Furthermore, genetic engineering is not merely a theoretical possibility for future biowarfare: it has already been applied in past weapons programmes, particularly in the former Soviet Union. One example is the USSR's 'invisible anthrax', resulting from the introduction of an alien gene into Bacillus anthracis that altered its immunological properties (Pomerantsev et al., 1997). Existing vaccines proved to be ineffective against this new genetically engineered strain.

...genetic engineering will not necessarily have a major role in the early stages of a biowarfare programme

In debates about genetic engineering and biological weapons it is often stated that natural pathogens are sufficiently dangerous and deadly, and that genetic engineering is not necessary to turn them into more effective biological weapons. This is indeed true in that biological weapons can be used without genetic engineering—or, for that matter, without any scientific knowledge—as has been shown by their effective use in past centuries. In fact, genetic engineering does not necessarily have a central role in the early stages of a biowarfare programme. The development of reliable, effective biological weapons requires an intense and resource-demanding research programme that must, step by step, solve increasingly complex problems: the procurement of virulent strains of suitable agents, the mass production of the agents without loss of pathogenicity, and the development of an effective means of delivery. In particular, the third step is very demanding, and has rarely been accomplished, with the exception of the huge former biowarfare programmes in the USA (Fig. 2) and the USSR. Even Iraq, after several years of an active biowarfare programme, had developed only rudimentary methods of delivery. From this perspective, genetic engineering is a step taken relatively late in the development of biowarfare potential, which most probably will not be taken before the first, essential steps are solved. Indeed, we know only from the massive biowarfare programme in the former Soviet Union that pathogens have been genetically modified to increase their effectiveness as bioweapons, but there may have been other, so far undetected, attempts elsewhere.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 4-embor860-f2.jpg
Figure 2
The so-called '8-ball', a 1 million litre steel ball built in 1949 in which the US Army tested the effectiveness of biological weapons. The ball is in Fort Detrick, Maryland, and is a 'historical monument' today. (© (2001) Jan van Aken/Sunshine Project.)

By contrast, it must not be underestimated that hardly any natural pathogens are really well suited to being biowarfare agents from a military point of view. Such a bioweapon must fulfil a variety of demands: it needs to be produced in large amounts, it must act fast, it must be environmentally robust, and the disease must be treatable, or a vaccine must be available, to allow the protection of one's own soldiers. This explains why only a minority of natural pathogens are suitable for military purposes. Anthrax is of course the first choice because the causative agent, B. anthracis, fulfils nearly all of these specifications (Fig. 3). However, potential victims of an anthrax attack can be treated with antibiotics even several days after an infection. Therefore, only a minority of the infected persons will die from an anthrax attack in most instances, as has been shown by the anthrax attacks in 2001 in the USA. However, a very simple genetic intervention could produce much more drastic and deadly results.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 4-embor860-f3.jpg
Figure 3
Until 1969, the US Army produced anthrax spores for offensive warfare in this building at Fort Detrick, Maryland. (© (2001) Jan van Aken/Sunshine Project.)

In addition, another important restriction of bioweapons might be overcome by genetic engineering techniques in the future. Today, access to highly virulent agents and strains is increasingly regulated and restricted. In particular, smallpox, which was eradicated more than 20 years ago, is officially only stored at two high-security laboratories in the USA and Russia, and it is at present virtually impossible to gain access to these virus stocks. But considering the rapid development of molecular biology, it is only a question of time before the artificial synthesis of agents or new combinations of agents becomes possible. This danger was highlighted last year by a worrying article in Science: a research team at the State University of New York in Stony Brook chemically synthesized an artificial polio virus from scratch (Cello et al., 2002). They started with the genetic sequence of the agent, which is available online, ordered small, tailor-made DNA sequences and combined them to reconstruct the complete viral genome. In a final step, the synthesized DNA was brought to life by adding a chemical cocktail that initiated the production of a living, pathogenic virus.

In principle, this method could be used to synthesize other viruses with similarly short DNA sequences. This includes at least five viruses that are considered to be potential biowarfare agents, among them Ebola virus, Marburg virus and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. The first two in particular are very rare viruses that might be difficult to acquire by potential bioweaponeers—according to rumours, members of the Japanese cult Aum Shinrikyo, famous for the nerve gas attack on the Tokyo subway, tried unsuccessfully to get their hands on Ebola virus during an outbreak in former Zaire in the 1990s. Using the method that has been published for polio, such a group or an interested state could theoretically construct Ebola virus in the laboratory. However, it should be noted that this method is complex, and probably only a few highly trained experts would be able to master this technique, at least for the time being.

The polio virus itself is not an effective biological weapon, but the experiment shows the tremendous potential of genetic engineering and also highlights its problems, particularly when applied to smallpox. The current risk assessments with regard to this virus rate the likelihood of an attack as being rather low, because it is highly unlikely—although not completely impossible—that countries other than Russia and the USA have access to it. If it should become possible to rebuild variola major, the smallpox virus, in the laboratory from scratch—and the virus's genome sequence is available from biological databases—this risk could change greatly. Smallpox is an ideal biological weapon, particularly for terrorist groups, because it is highly infectious and lethal and there is no effective treatment available. The relative safety that can be assumed today will then be gone.

However, the method for creating polio virus artificially cannot be directly transferred to the smallpox virus. The variola genome, with more than 200,000 base pairs, is far bigger than that of polio, and even if it were possible to recreate the full smallpox sequence in vitro, it could not easily be transformed into a live infectious virus particle. But there might be other ways. It would, for example, be possible to start with a closely related virus, such as monkeypox or mousepox, and to alter specifically those bases and sequences that differ from human smallpox. Some months ago, researchers documented for the first time that the sequence of a pathogenicity-related gene from the vaccinia virus could be transformed through the targeted mutation of 13 base pairs into the sequence of the corresponding smallpox gene (Rosengard et al., 2002). It is probably only a matter of time before this technique is applicable to full genomes, and then we shall have to reconsider our current assessment of the smallpox threat. Considering the extreme danger that smallpox poses to a now largely unvaccinated human population, it seems at least questionable to make the smallpox sequence available on the World Wide Web.

However, the genetic enhancement of classical pathogens is only a small part of the broad array of possibilities that new biomedical techniques have created. From the point of view of disarmament, another trend is much more alarming: new types of biological weapons are becoming possible that were entirely fictitious until a few years ago. This is especially true of so-called 'non-lethal' weapons that are designed for use outside classical warfare. The danger is that these new possibilities generate desires even in countries that previously renounced the use and development of classical biological weapons.

The global norm against biological weapons, laid down in the 1925 Geneva Convention and the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, clearly contributed to the fact that few countries have been engaged in research into offensive biowarfare during recent decades. This moral barrier seems to be lower for 'non-lethal' weapons that are targeted against materials or drug-producing plants. Indeed, today's technical possibilities are creating a new interest in this area that might be leading to a new biological arms race. In the following paragraphs, we document three real examples of biological and chemical weapons development that are now being pursued by democracies in the Western world. All three examples have been researched and extensively published by the Sunshine Project (further reading is available at www.sunshine-project.org).

The US military has repeatedly discussed possible uses of biotechnology for warfare scenarios, including the development of material-degrading microorganisms to destroy fuel, constructional material or stealth paints (Strategic Assessment Center of Science Applications International Corporation, 1995; US Army War College, 1996). This idea is based on the fact that natural microorganisms are able to degrade nearly every material and are already being used to detoxify environmental pollution. The natural organisms are rather slow-acting and unreliable, but, with the help of genetic engineering, the development of much more effective organisms might become possible—probably effective enough to be used as biological weapons (Sayler, 2000). The specific interest of military researchers in material-degrading microbes is due to the synergistic effects of two concurrent developments: first, the military, particularly in the USA, has a renewed interest in these non-lethal weapons for use in mediasensitive mili-tary operations so that visible civilian victims can be avoided; second, rapid developments in biotechnology provide the

Considering the extreme danger that smallpox poses to a now largely unvaccinated human population, it seems at least questionable to make the smallpox sequence available on the World Wide Web

technological basis to change natural microorganisms into anti-material microbes. New technological possibilities met new military concepts in the USA and led to a renewed interest in weapons that, until recently, had been banned and rejected.

In 1998, it became public that the US Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC was developing genetically engineered fungi with offensive biowarfare potential. They isolated natural microorganisms that degrade a variety of materials, such as plastics, rubber and metals, and used genetic engineering to make them more powerful and focused—one of these genetically engineered microbes can destroy military paints in 72 hours. The principal investigator at the Naval Research Laboratory, James Campbell, described possible applications of this technology in his presentation at the 3rd Non-Lethal Defense Symposium in 1998. Among them were “microbial derived or based esterases [that] might be used to strip signature-control coatings from aircraft, thus facilitating detection and destruction of the aircraft” (www.dtic.mil/ndia/NLD3/camp.pdf). This work is purportedly defensive in nature, although no threat has been articulated, and continuing research by the US Navy and Army continues to strive towards taking these weapons from the laboratory to the field. Just a few years later, in 2002, several research proposals by the US military that were clearly offensive in nature became public.

New technological possibilities met new military concepts in the USA and led to a renewed interest in weapons that, until recently, had been banned and rejected

About a decade ago, the USA also increased their efforts to identify microorganisms that kill drug-producing crops; by the late 1990s, this research focused largely on two fungi. The testing of one, Pleospora papaveracea, against opium poppy, was conducted in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, with financial and scientific support from the USA, and was completed in 2001. Pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum strains developed in the USA to kill coca plants were scheduled for field tests in Colombia in 2000, but international protests halted this project. These fungi provide a quintessential example of the hostile use of biological agents. In Colombia, the biggest areas of coca and opium poppy cultivation are in combat zones, and the 'War on Drugs' is part of the country's continuing armed conflict. These biological agents are lowering the political threshold for the use of biological weapons and are likely to have tremendous environmental and health impacts. The pursuit of crop-killing fungi as weapons would be a further slide down a slippery slope that, by following the same logic, could easily lead to the use of other plant pathogens, animal pathogens or even non-lethal biological weapons against humans (van Aken & Hammond, 2002).

The third example is not about biological weapons but new types of chemical, or rather biochemical, weapons. As in the other examples, the revolution in biomedicine created new desires in the East and the West, and there are already new weapons under development that violate international treaties. This area came under the spotlight of the international media after the use of psychoactive substances in the Moscow hostage crisis last year, causing the death of more than 170 people. These supposedly 'non-lethal' chemical weapons had been developed as early as the 1950s, particularly a substance called 'BZ', known in the US army as 'sleeping gas'. But BZ caused very different effects in different individuals and was considered to be unreliable, leading to its banishment from the US chemical arsenal in the late 1960s. Today, however, modern neurobiology provides comprehensive knowledge about a broad range of neuroreceptors and manifold psychoactive substances that make 'non-lethal' chemical weapons attractive for the military once more. For instance, the US Marine Corps recently investigated the potential military usefulness of calmatives such as benzodiazepines and α2-adrenoreceptor agonists. However, the identification of suitable substances is only one part of the renewed chemical weapons research in the USA. Recently published documents show that the US military forces are also developing new delivery devices for chemicals with a range of more than 2.5 km—a distance that makes sense only for warfare scenarios as opposed to police operations, in which ranges from 10 to 50 m for tear gas grenades are common. The Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits any use of chemicals, including 'non-lethal' chemicals, in warfare situations. Even the use of tear gas is prohibited because of the enormous danger of escalation. In a specific combat situation, the attacked side will be unable to identify the nature of the chemical used and might feel tempted to retaliate in kind with potentially lethal chemicals.

Molecular biology and genetic engineering are still in their infancy, and more technical possibilities will arise in the years to come—for military abuse too (Fraser & Dando, 2001). More efficient classical biowarfare agents will probably have only a marginal role, even if the genetically engineered 'superbug' is still routinely featured in newspaper reports. More likely and more alarming are weapons for new types of conflicts and warfare scenarios, namely low-intensity warfare or secret operations, for economic warfare or for sabotage activities. To prevent the hostile exploitation of biology now and forever, a bundle of measures must be taken, from strengthening the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention to building an awareness in the scientific community about the possibilities and dangers of abuse. Any kind of biotechnological or biomedical research, development or production must be performed in an internationally transparent and controlled manner. In cases in which military abuse seems to be imminent and likely, alternative ways to pursue the same research goal have to be developed. Furthermore, as we mentioned above with regard to the smallpox genome sequence, it might also be necessary to apply restrictions to certain research and/or publications.

​
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 4-embor860-i1.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 4-embor860-i2.jpg
Go to:
References
Cello J., Paul A.V. & Wimmer E. (2002) Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science, 297, 1016–1018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fraser C.M. & Dando M.R. (2001) Genomics and future biological weapons: the need for preventive action by the biomedical community. Nature Genet., 29, 253–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pomerantsev A.P., Staritsin N.A., Mockov Y.V. & Marinin L.I. (1997) Expression of cereolysine ab genes in Bacillus anthracis vaccine strain ensures protection against experimental hemolytic anthrax infection. Vaccine, 15, 1846–1850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rosengard A.M., Liu Y., Nie Z. & Jimenez R. (2002) Variola virus immune evasion design: expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 8808–8813. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sayler G. (2000) Field applications of genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation processes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 11, 286–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strategic Assessment Center of Science Applications International Corporation (1995) Biotechnology — Military Applications. SAIC. Available under FOIA from the authors. [Google Scholar]
US Army War College (1996) Summary Report on 'Biotechnology Workshop 2020', 29 and 30 May 1996. SAIC, document number 96-6963. Available under FOIA from the authors.
van Aken J.P. & Hammond E. (2002) Closing loopholes in the Biological Weapons Convention. Med. Confl. Surviv., 18, 194–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[Gwin Ru]

...

... bio-weapon lab ancestry:
The Crowhouse (https://t.me/thecrowhouseoffical)
This week we time travel to 1530 and Geneva.

"When the bubonic plague struck Geneva in 1530, everything was ready. They even opened a whole hospital for the plague victims. With doctors, paramedics and nurses. The traders contributed, the magistrate gave grants every month. The patients always gave money, and if one of them died alone, all the goods went to the hospital.

But then a disaster happened: the plague was dying out, while the subsidies depended on the number of patients. There was no question of right and wrong for the Geneva hospital staff in 1530. If the plague produces money, then the plague is good. And then the doctors got organized.

At first, they just poisoned patients to raise the mortality statistics, but they quickly realized that the statistics didn't have to be just about mortality, but about mortality from plague. So they began to cut the boils from the bodies of the dead, dry them, grind them in a mortar and give them to other patients as medicine. Then they started dusting clothes, handkerchiefs and garters. But somehow the plague continued to abate. Apparently, the dried buboes didn't work well. Doctors went into town and spread bubonic powder on door handles at night, selecting those homes where they could then profit. As an eyewitness wrote of these events, "this remained hidden for some time, but the devil is more concerned with increasing the number of sins than with hiding them."

In short, one of the doctors became so impudent and lazy that he decided not to wander the city at night, but simply threw a bundle of dust into the crowd during the day. The stench rose to the sky and one of the girls, who by a lucky chance had recently come out of that hospital, discovered what that smell was.

The doctor was tied up and placed in the good hands of competent “craftsmen.” They tried to get as much information from him as possible. However, the execution lasted several days. The ingenious hippocrats were tied to poles on wagons and carried around the city. At each intersection the executioners used red-hot tongs to tear off pieces of meat. They were then taken to the public square, beheaded and quartered, and the pieces were taken to all the districts of Geneva.

The only exception was the hospital director's son, who did not take part in the trial but blurted out that he knew how to make potions and how to prepare the powder without fear of contamination. He was simply beheaded "to prevent the spread of evil".

- François Bonivard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Bonivard), Chronicles of Geneva, second volume, pages 395 - 402
t.me/thecrowhouseoffical/870 (https://t.me/thecrowhouseoffical/870)

edited Dec 22 at 05:07 (https://t.me/thecrowhouseoffical/870)

[Blastolabs]

Disclaimer: I got very sick just prior to the "pandemic" with what I assume was covid-19.

I am not 100% sure about much of anything and do not pretend to know the "truth"

How many times have we as a community been able to so easily and quickly connect all the dots so quickly and easily to explain a serious global operation committed by those currently in control?

Hypothesis: Both the "Wuhan Lab Leak" and the "Fort Deterick Lab Leak" narratives are elaborate PSYOPS whose function is to make our community specifically believe that a NEW deadly bioweapon had been released.

I have been researching virology and the science behind disease ever since the pandemic began and something very odd became apparent after a short time.

Virologist have long abandoned the scientific method because they were unable to use it to support their beliefs about infectious disease.

I have a problem with this.

The average person and a chemists definition of isolation is VERY different than that of a virologist.

It is a fact that no one has ever truly isolated a virus and shown that this isolate alone causes any disease.

We have the ability to isolate viruses, this requires the use of filtration and then a centrifuge which allows you to siphon ONLY viral particles.

But no one has done this, then using that isolate shown that it can be used via normal means to infect another living thing.

No one has replicated this experiment either of course for obvious reasons.

In the 1940's many scientists including Pasteur attempted to do this and failed, so they gave up but the belief that w virus causes a disease remained.

I find it hard to believe that if the concept of a virus that we are familiar exists, then these experiments would have taken place by now.

Andrew Kaufman along with a few other scientists have been given great interviews about this.

From his website:

"since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud."


https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/