View Full Version : A deep investigation into the Floyd/Chauvin connection, and much more
Maia Gabrial
21st June 2020, 21:24
I'm all about finding out the Truth no matter where it takes me. And this one just keeps getting hairier than ever.
In Pursuit of the Truth is one of my favorite places for information. Looks like there's more to the Floyd/Chauvin story than anyone could imagine. Wait until you see where this goes....
IdRcL6u2fZs
Bill Ryan
22nd June 2020, 00:44
As soon as I started watching this, I found it riveting. This seems to be one heck of a impressively good job of investigative reporting. It's pretty much a whole documentary film.
The video presents many jigsaw puzzle pieces, which may fit together in various ways. But it sure looks like there may be a bigger picture that's not yet fully known — or maybe not known at all.
Highly recommended. I learned more about the background of this story from this one video than from all other media sources put together. And I also immediately downloaded the video, which might well prove too sensitive for YouTube.
Bill Ryan
22nd June 2020, 14:25
:bump:
Bumping this already. In these confusing times, where so many good people here have different information from different sources, I don't really want this to slip out of sight. This video could be offering a punch of new puzzle pieces to help us all assemble whatever the big picture is.
wegge
22nd June 2020, 15:05
The video is chok full of gems!
Who knew there would be a Hamas connection?
It´s almost too full of information, I´m sure I didn´t get everything the first time.
DeDukshyn
22nd June 2020, 16:42
I don't know .... It was 100% obvious to me that Floyd slipped off the edge of the sidewalk that is raised about 4 inches from the road (looks like he twisted an ankle) and that is why he went down ... 13:00 minutes -- look carefully at where his feet are. You can see his foot fold off the edge of the curb, then he falls.
I only got about that far into it though ... but so far the implication that Floyd "laid down" so the officers could kneel on him, - well by looking at the video, I'd say that wasn't what happened at all. When I watch the video carefully, I do not see that, I see a guy roll his ankle over the edge of the curb.
There's another view of it at 5:12.
I'll try to get this finished up later and will follow up.
Tintin
22nd June 2020, 16:43
Yes, this is really very good. :highfive:
It's a rabbit warren and does start to echo where the various twists went in the Madeleine McCann story. If any of you followed or researched that then you'll know what I mean.
Gwin Ru
22nd June 2020, 16:56
The OP video shows portions of the video I had seen and was disappeared later in which Floyd is walked across the street to the police car #320, falls down on the left side of the car, then put into the car's backseat and then removed from the back seat from the other side of the car # 320 and tackled to the ground on the right side of the car.
As mentioned in the OP video, with most other videos having been disappeared, why was this one not disappeared as well unless it was the intention to keep it circulating and seen so as to lit the fuse to ignite a well oiled orchestration of events.
Related:
... Or did George Floyd Die of a Drug Overdose? (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111084-The-murder-of-George-Floyd-in-police-hands-Minneapolis-25-May-2020&p=1361550&viewfull=1#post1361550)
Re: The murder of George Floyd in police hands, Minneapolis, 25 May 2020 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111084-The-murder-of-George-Floyd-in-police-hands-Minneapolis-25-May-2020&p=1360307&viewfull=1#post1360307)
AutumnW
22nd June 2020, 17:15
There is no way George Floyd participated in some kind of weird crisis actor thing, if that is what this video is stating.
Get out of your heads and into your hearts. There is a terrible problem with racism in the U.S, and murder by cop...etc...Don't blend it into some twisty turny complex conspiracy.
That serves nobody and is inadvertantly extremely cruel.
DeDukshyn
22nd June 2020, 17:23
Well if you are going to take the time to respond, might as well take the time to add your supporting thoughts and give the post a bit more value.
Edit: Thanks for the addition. :) This post is no longer needed, if mods want to delete it.
Bill Ryan
22nd June 2020, 18:14
There is no way George Floyd participated in some kind of weird crisis actor thing, if that is what this video is stating. No, that's not actually what the video is saying. That's never suggested.
It presents a great deal of detailed research information... jigsaw puzzle pieces that all seem to be worth seeing how they may fit into some larger picture. Some of the pieces I'd never had imagined exist, or certainly seem to.
The video itself doesn't draw any conclusions. It's just a ton and a half of condensed data, in a 90-minute flood of documented information.
Chauvin is shown to be quite an unpleasant person, btw, so it's not trying to get him off any hook. But George Floyd is shown to be quite an unpleasant person as well. There may have been no good guys anywhere around, but there definitely seems to be more to the story.
kfm27917
22nd June 2020, 18:25
Hi TinTin
Can you expand on the perceived connection ?
Thanks
RunningDeer
22nd June 2020, 19:56
It presents a great deal of detailed research information... jigsaw puzzle pieces that all seem to be worth seeing how they may fit into some larger picture. Some of the pieces I'd never had imagined exist, or certainly seem to.
The video itself doesn't draw any conclusions. It's just a ton and a half of condensed data, in a 90-minute flood of documented information.
The OP’s video by Sir Patrick Mack, of The Pursuit of Truth (IPOT) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAyrKoW31y5UcsRjh2ItvxQ/videos) was also posted in the Members Only (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-associated-US-political-analysis&p=1361977&viewfull=1#post1361977) section.
Patrick Mack has produced other documentaries (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAyrKoW31y5UcsRjh2ItvxQ/videos) as well. As you pointed out, they are comprehensive, he states the info and allows all the draw their own conclusions.
Mack has over 215,000 subscribers. Over the last 30 days he has averaged 1.237M views (https://socialblade.com/youtube/channel/UCAyrKoW31y5UcsRjh2ItvxQ) and has 109.7K Twitter (https://twitter.com/IPOT1776) followers.
http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/Empower/Sir-Partick-6-22.jpg
♡
Tintin
22nd June 2020, 23:24
Hi TinTin
Can you expand on the perceived connection ?
Thanks
Sure :highfive:
Just to be clear I wasn't stating there was a connection necessarily with this event and Madeleine's, just that there are similarities in the journey where you end up quite surprised with the destination - unexpected. With Madeleine her story was sold to the world as a kidnap, and then a little further digging then leads all the way up to the UK Government, parents even speaking with the Prime Minister, Royal Family getting involved, celebrity status, and even an audience with His Holiness. Something made me extraordinarily wary when that story first broke all those years ago, and, with good reason as it turns out.
Same with this George Floyd story: it stank from the word 'go'. This has nothing whatsoever to solely do with police brutality and racism, that's for sure. There's more to it.
The video in the OP begins a journey that will I have little doubt uncover all sorts of other hitherto unknown links. In fact I may even have a look in Epstein's black book (there's a copy in the library) to see if any of the names dropped in the video occur there, and in what context.
This incident, like the Madeleine case, just isn't the real story, just what's been spun by the narrative controllers. What is uncovered later on down the line is anyone's guess.
I'd also said in the moderator chatroom a few weeks ago that there's also something of the Sandy Hook about all this too, if you get my drift. Something's really afoot here. The narrative is being used as a cover for something, not just a 'trigger' for the obvious social destruction being wrought and long sought after.
kfm27917
23rd June 2020, 00:21
all good points.
Thanks
Gemma13
23rd June 2020, 01:08
The alleged connection between the (targeted) buildings burning to the ground within 24hrs is a biggie imo. Urgent scrub of evidence (terrorist and/or trafficking cells) after a leaked hit coming their way??
onawah
27th June 2020, 23:36
[B]Project Camelot--THE GEORGE FLOYD SET UP
6/26/20
https://projectcamelotportal.com/2020/06/09/the-george-floyd-set-up/
https://projectcamelotportal.com/wp-content/uploads/101100486_10157431989700838_9059337323036016640_o-1-696x474.jpg
"I think the real question that has to be asked is how fueling protests serves the Illuminati/Deep State agenda going forward. Because that is how they work. None of this takes away from the cause of protests over police brutality… Black lives do Matter, All Lives Matter. But what is happening is setting the stage for something else.
CONSPIRACY: When two or more people plot or conspire to do harm or mislead… = DEEP STATE
THIS ARTICLE FROM NATURAL NEWS HAS BEEN BANNED BY FACEBOOK
FALSE FLAG ALERT: Obama Foundation tweeted about George Floyd on May 17th, a week before his supposed murder – UPDATE
www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-08-false-flag-obama-foundation-tweeted-george-floyd.html
LOTS of puzzling Questions about the George Floyd Incident:
1.Why does one photo from behind show the man on the road is not handcuffed and the video from the front that he is handcuffed?
2. Why is the cop car in the restaurant surveillance video different than the one Floyd was lying behind (different car numbers)?
3. Why were the cops in the surveillance footage that arrested him different than the police in the actual incident?
4. Why does the video show the diesel fuel price as 99 cents instead of the regular price in the area of $2.49?
5. Why does the Police Car have a non-Municipal license plate with “Police” on it?
6. Why does Derek have a completely different police badge on top of a second police badge matching his partner’s if they work for the same precinct?
7. Why is it not odd that both Officers Tou Thao and Derek Chauvin have both previously been investigated for excessive use of force and not charged by State AG Amy Klobuchar?
Additionally, Officer Derek Chauvin is married to his partner’s sister Kelli.
8. Is there any cop dumb enough to continue kneeling on someone’s neck for 8 minutes when surrounded by people and being video recorded?
9. Is it possible for the deceased’s cousins and fiancé to be completely tearless during interviews?
10. Why does the main cop have one hand in his pocket most of the time he’s kneeling?
11. Why did the kneeling officer appear completely cool and calm, as if he was posing for the camera?
12. Doesn’t it seem strange that Floyd and the officer that kneeled on his neck worked security together on the same shift at the El Nuevo Rodeo Club, the officer for 17 years (both were laid off because of the Covid Virus)?
13. Why do the neighbors of this officer say they didn’t know he was a cop and never saw him in uniform?
14. Why has the same attorney been hired as with all the other big supposed police killings of blacks? Attorney Benjamin Crump. The same attorney that worked on previous cases that resulted in busses bringing in rioters from outside the city?
15. Why does store surveillance video show Floyd calmly and submissively walking with the officer and not resisting arrest while the officer gently allowed him to sit down on the side walk, and multiple officers calmly chatting with him? Is this the kind of suspect that a police officer would feel the need to put on the ground and place his knee on his neck
16. Why did the EMT workers (wearing Police Uniforms including bullet proof vests) roughly handle and dump the unconscious George on the stretcher? This is not how trained emergency workers lift a person with a possible neck injury. Why did they not attempt triage or try CPR?
17. Can someone really not breath when someone kneels on his neck and is the victim really able to speak for considerable periods of time if he can’t breathe?
18. Post killing: Why is a white man that looks like an undercover (St Paul) cop in black and a riot gear mask carrying a black umbrella walking around breaking windows (and others dressed similarly starting fires) and instigating a riot? Is this reminiscent of “umbrella man” during the JFK shooting?
19. Why were almost all the rioters leading the destruction of the neighborhood at the beginning of the riots “white” and not from Minneapolis… in a black neighborhood after a police killed a black man?
20. Why did the Chief of Police make it a point that those Inciting the Riots and Arsonists were not from Minnesota?
21. Why was a CNN News Crew not only detained but also Arrested?
Edward E. Hueske
Consulting Forensic Scientist
350 ACR 3582
Palestine, TX 75803
Here are a few more:
1. The first autopsy concluded he did not die of asphyxiation. Then the family hired another coroner (the same one who lied to the public about Epstein dying) to do a second autopsy who then came to the conclusion they wanted that he died of asphyxia)?
2. Why is George Floyd whose shoulders are massively larger than the cop poised for the camera not struggle when supposedly gasping for breath… He should have been thrashing around struggling for breath it’s an involuntary response….
3. In order to breath, why didn’t the massive Floyd just flick the cop off his back by turning to the side? He has the strength.
4. Why did they have to hold him down at all if he was handcuffed? Why didn’t they just let him stand…where was he gonna go?
5. Why were cops with knees on necks shown in copycat incidents in Paris and Madrid and protests resulted."
These are the videos from the Natural News article:
blob:https://www.brighteon.com/3f7548bb-4611-446a-8ef4-2b4b9b48274f
blob:https://www.brighteon.com/5f8d01b4-c44d-4698-9563-8edbaaeed25c
TravelerJim
28th June 2020, 15:11
Wow, lot of stuff here, well worth the listen, especially at 1.5 speed. :)
A few observations.
1. Chauvin was called to the scene, he was not there originally. Why was he called? Was it just coincidence that he is the one who showed up given his possible relationship with Floyd.
2. The Islamic community seems to be much more involved in the whole situation that I knew before.
3. I think I read that the fundme campaign for Floyd family now stands at 12MM? I dont think this was covered in the video but a lot of money is changing hands here.
4. Generally speaking, it seems the US is facing a much more systemic challenge to its very survival than even I thought....
Thanks for sharing.
Bill Ryan
28th June 2020, 15:31
it seems the US is facing a much more systemic challenge to its very survival than even I thought....
Yes, that may be a perfect way of summarizing the danger.
kfm27917
28th June 2020, 16:26
videos removed by Brightheon - 494 message
June 28 9:25 PST
Bill Ryan
28th June 2020, 16:40
videos removed by Brighteon - 404 message
June 28 9:25 PSTYes, Mike Adams very probably took them down himself. (Brighteon is his own platform.) His article (https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-08-false-flag-obama-foundation-tweeted-george-floyd.html) is still up, though. My guess is that Mike will retract that soon.
It's a non-story — the whole "Obama knew" thing is just a Twitter datestamp peculiarity, explained in this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111084-The-murder-of-George-Floyd-in-police-hands-Minneapolis-25-May-2020&p=1360138&viewfull=1#post1360138).
:focus:
onawah
28th June 2020, 17:08
IF similar incidents actually did occur in Madrid and Paris, all within a few days of each other, that would seem to be more indication that not only the US, but other countries are being subjected to the same kind of psyop, and that the controllers behind this are arrogantly tipping their hand ever more obviously.
(Showing us again that at this is a psychological war as much as any other kind of war. )
BUT I haven't seen any corroboration re incidents in Paris and Madrid, and that surely would have been all over the news.
This "fact check" from Reuters says they didn't happen: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-floyd-claims-idUSKBN23J2JK
(Not that Reuters is all that credible, OR Natural News, for that matter.)
Has anyone else seen anything corroborating the claim that similar incidents happened in other countries around the same time as the Floyd incident?
If not, the false claim reflects negatively back on Project Camelot, which is sad, as it just adds fuel to the fire.
Justjane
28th June 2020, 22:19
There is no way George Floyd participated in some kind of weird crisis actor thing, if that is what this video is stating.
Get out of your heads and into your hearts. There is a terrible problem with racism in the U.S, and murder by cop...etc...Don't blend it into some twisty turny complex conspiracy.
That serves nobody and is inadvertantly extremely cruel.
The video is far far worse. That it is being discussed here with any serious is beyond disturbing. The video shows extremely tentative links between the nightclub owner Maya Santamaria and Barrack Obama, claiming her mother went to university with his mother. I researched this and there is no evidence that the woman presented is even Maya's mother.
It also tentatively links Maya to Hamas as she sold the nightclub 4 years to a company who may have owners who may be connected to Hamas.
It also tries to connect it to Pizzagate because a mural supporting George Floyd was decorated with hearts. I stopped watching at that point because I just couldn’t.
The lengths people go to create a conspiracy out of an issue they don’t support or believe in is gobsmacking and devastating. Cue the cries of ‘I’m not racist’ here.
Videos like this make me cry. I lose all hope for the future of humankind. When the people who are most energised to create change on this planet are supporting dross like this, I just can’t.
shaberon
29th June 2020, 05:00
[
It also tentatively links Maya to Hamas as she sold the nightclub 4 years to a company who may have owners who may be connected to Hamas.
I tend to smash "investigative journalism" that revels in fuzzy phrases like "is connected to".
On a personal level in the early 2000s I knew of a Lebanese restaurateur I had admired for years get raked by investigation on "being connected to the Taliban". I also knew an Arabic court interpreter who was used for lots of cases related to this.
Most of it was a waste of time, since they were going after the wrong thing or nothing, viz., refusing to implicate Saudi Arabia and expose U. S. assets and so forth. It was a bit like a racist time-wasting campaign.
I have also extensively used the...Specially Designated Nationals list, I think that's what it is called, a list of "terrorists" that if you see them you are supposed to get the F. B. I. or something. And I had the damn thing go off several times about hispanics, since they could use two last names, plus nicknames and other aliases. A guy could have six names, and so if the system thinks it is pretty close to the person in front of you, there will be an interruption.
It's talking about some gunman in Colombia, as if he is arriving by boat or plane, and, here I am not doing any of that kind of stuff, and it starts telling me someone I already know is the commander of a death squad.
I turned it off every time.
I have voluntarily reported what I firmly believe to be coyotes or human traffickers, although I doubt a single thing was ever done about it. The system thinks it is better than you.
Everything is really suspicious and edgy and prone to press charges on a lot of innocents, in court or in public opinion.
DaveToo
30th June 2020, 02:38
Well there's 1 hr. and 28 minutes of my life I'll never get back. :(
At 24:00:
"They were both bouncers at that restaurant for 17 years."
Not according to what I learned. Floyd only arrived in Minneapolis in 2014. So he could only have worked there for 6 years.
At 35:40:
"Were the fires rioting and looting simply just random acts
of violence, or is there a chance that these were targeted efforts
to remove evidence of a much larger story?"
So you mean to tell me that instead of the owners of the properties
simply removing the evidence themselves, at their convenience, they
preferred to have an elaborate murder plotted, so that the ensuing riots (which they were sure would take place) would result in the burning down of their properties and the destruction of the evidence??? !!!
I'm sure if the 'documentary' writer had 30 more minutes to work with, he would have made a connection
between Floyd and JFK.
AutumnW
30th June 2020, 02:41
Just Jane,
Thank you for this!
"The lengths people go to create a conspiracy out of an issue they don’t support or believe in is gobsmacking and devastating. Cue the cries of ‘I’m not racist’ here."
wegge
30th June 2020, 05:26
Well there's 1 hr. and 28 minutes of my life I'll never get back. :(
At 24:00:
"They were both bouncers at that restaurant for 17 years."
Not according to what I learned. Floyd only arrived in Minneapolis in 2014. So he could only have worked there for 6 years.
At 35:40:
"Were the fires rioting and looting simply just random acts
of violence, or is there a chance that these were targeted efforts
to remove evidence of a much larger story?"
So you mean to tell me that instead of the owners of the properties
simply removing the evidence themselves, at their convenience, they
preferred to have an elaborate murder plotted, so that the ensuing riots (which they were sure would take place) would result in the burning down of their properties and the destruction of the evidence??? !!!
I'm sure if the 'documentary' writer had 30 more minutes to work with, he would have made a connection
between Floyd and JFK.
I just relistened to the scene at minute 24, it’s a woman stating on the phone that they both worked there for 17 years, after that the narrator takes up again, stating that Chauvin worked there for 17 years outside, and Floyd for a year inside?
Would urge you to listen again and not draw faulty conclusions.
I’m sure no one means to tell you something (and offend your intelligence?) that’s the story you construe in your mind. But couldn’t it, on some level of reality, be possible that someone destroys evidence on their own and is very happy that he gets an official cover up that gives him an alibi etc?
The lie is different on every level so this can have many angles to it and reductionism and pulling out two facts out of a few hundred and adding your twist to them won‘t help to arrive at a deeper truth (if the allusion that there might be a deeper truth is not already outrageous by itself)
DaveToo
30th June 2020, 05:47
Well there's 1 hr. and 28 minutes of my life I'll never get back. :(
At 24:00:
"They were both bouncers at that restaurant for 17 years."
Not according to what I learned. Floyd only arrived in Minneapolis in 2014. So he could only have worked there for 6 years.
At 35:40:
"Were the fires rioting and looting simply just random acts
of violence, or is there a chance that these were targeted efforts
to remove evidence of a much larger story?"
So you mean to tell me that instead of the owners of the properties
simply removing the evidence themselves, at their convenience, they
preferred to have an elaborate murder plotted, so that the ensuing riots (which they were sure would take place) would result in the burning down of their properties and the destruction of the evidence??? !!!
I'm sure if the 'documentary' writer had 30 more minutes to work with, he would have made a connection
between Floyd and JFK.
I just relistened to the scene at minute 24, it’s a woman stating on the phone that they both worked there for 17 years, after that the narrator takes up again, stating that Chauvin worked there for 17 years outside, and Floyd for a year inside?
Would urge you to listen again and not draw faulty conclusions.
I’m sure no one means to tell you something (and offend your intelligence?) that’s the story you construe in your mind. But couldn’t it, on some level of reality, be possible that someone destroys evidence on their own and is very happy that he gets an official cover up that gives him an alibi etc?
The lie is different on every level so this can have many angles to it and reductionism and pulling out two facts out of a few hundred and adding your twist to them won‘t help to arrive at a deeper truth (if the allusion that there might be a deeper truth is not already outrageous by itself)
Wow don't be so defensive, or you'll come off sounding like you were in on the production!
I am very much aware that a woman stated that they both worked there for 17 years.
What was the reason that the producer chose to air this false information above other information?
Maybe he had the hots for her?
I know that if I was producing a film I would double and triple check information and make darn certain no false information
was released (to tarnish my reputation).
I’m sure no one means to tell you something (and offend your intelligence?) that’s the story you construe in your mind. But couldn’t it, on some level of reality, be possible that someone destroys evidence on their own and is very happy that he gets an official cover up that gives him an alibi etc?Oh sure everything is possible. But it certainly doesn't make reasonable sense.
If you have evidence you need to destroy, just do it at your leisure. No one will know who did it or when.
But don't have a murder committed, then hope riots will ensue, and that someone will target your property to burn it to the ground!
It just seems like a stupid way to destroy evidence.
wegge
30th June 2020, 06:18
Well there's 1 hr. and 28 minutes of my life I'll never get back. :(
At 24:00:
"They were both bouncers at that restaurant for 17 years."
Not according to what I learned. Floyd only arrived in Minneapolis in 2014. So he could only have worked there for 6 years.
At 35:40:
"Were the fires rioting and looting simply just random acts
of violence, or is there a chance that these were targeted efforts
to remove evidence of a much larger story?"
So you mean to tell me that instead of the owners of the properties
simply removing the evidence themselves, at their convenience, they
preferred to have an elaborate murder plotted, so that the ensuing riots (which they were sure would take place) would result in the burning down of their properties and the destruction of the evidence??? !!!
I'm sure if the 'documentary' writer had 30 more minutes to work with, he would have made a connection
between Floyd and JFK.
I just relistened to the scene at minute 24, it’s a woman stating on the phone that they both worked there for 17 years, after that the narrator takes up again, stating that Chauvin worked there for 17 years outside, and Floyd for a year inside?
Would urge you to listen again and not draw faulty conclusions.
I’m sure no one means to tell you something (and offend your intelligence?) that’s the story you construe in your mind. But couldn’t it, on some level of reality, be possible that someone destroys evidence on their own and is very happy that he gets an official cover up that gives him an alibi etc?
The lie is different on every level so this can have many angles to it and reductionism and pulling out two facts out of a few hundred and adding your twist to them won‘t help to arrive at a deeper truth (if the allusion that there might be a deeper truth is not already outrageous by itself)
Wow don't be so defensive, or you'll come off sounding like you were in on the production!
I am very much aware that a woman stated that they both worked there for 17 years.
What was the reason that the producer chose to air this false information above other information?
Maybe he had the hots for her?
I know that if I was producing a film I would double and triple check information and make darn certain no false information
was released (to tarnish my reputation).
I’m sure no one means to tell you something (and offend your intelligence?) that’s the story you construe in your mind. But couldn’t it, on some level of reality, be possible that someone destroys evidence on their own and is very happy that he gets an official cover up that gives him an alibi etc?Oh sure everything is possible. But it certainly doesn't make reasonable sense.
If you have evidence you need to destroy, just do it at your leisure. No one will know who did it or when.
But don't have a murder committed, then hope riots will ensue, and that someone will target your property to burn it to the ground!
It just seems like a stupid way to destroy evidence.
I tried to ask the producer for her number!
Good point about why take in her false claims, but he corrects them with his own words.
No one can tell how, when and by whom the evidence was destroyed (if there was any to begin with).
BUT it’s a dope official story that you can sell easily to anyone, „yeah look our records all went down in the riot flames.“
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.