View Full Version : Conspiracy is Not a Theory
Gwin Ru
18th September 2020, 15:29
Conspiracy is Not a Theory (https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/09/conspiuracy-is-not-a-theory.html)
by Andrew
(henrymakow.com)
September 17, 2020
https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/William-Casey-CIA-disinfo-campaign.jpg.optimal.jpg
The modern world reflects the Satanist (Cabalist Jewish) conspiracy against God and man. The mainspring is the Cabalist Jewish (Masonic) central banking cartel. Its goal is the enslavement of mankind in a New World Order, world government tyranny, aka "globalism." This is behind the COVID pandemic hoax.
As Andrew explains below, the CIA helps administers this conspiracy worldwide. It is the "Deep State."
Andrew is a retired attorney living in Texas.
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
by Andrew
(henrymakow.com)
The problem with trying to explain "conspiracy theories" is most people don't understand that a "conspiracy" is:
An agreement among two or more coconspirators to commit an illegal act through legal means or to commit a legal act through illegal means.
So why are CONSPIRACY THEORIES demonized by MASS MEDIA (MSM) today?
In 1967 the CIA simply changed the definition of CONSPIRACY THEORIES to mean any narrative not approved by the CIA. The CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" ... to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the "Official" Narrative. (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-23/1967-he-cia-created-phrase-conspiracy-theorists-and-ways-attack-anyone-who-challenge)
https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/mock.png
The CIA's disinformation campaigns were known as"Operation Mockingbird" where the CIA charged the MSM to repeat the same story. Washington Post publisher Hugh Graham famously said that a journalist was cheaper to buy than a whore, "a couple of hundred bucks a month."
It was so effective that Zbigniew Brzezinski said in 1972,
"Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They'll only be able to parrot the information they've been given on the previous night's news."
Outside America, however, conspiracy theories are well respected.
For example, Russian Biologist and Former U.N. Expert Igor Nikulin explained last February that COVID-19 is a Biological Weapon Used by Global Government to Reduce the World's Population.
Igor Nikulin: "I believe that it is no coincidence [that China was infected with coronavirus]. I believe that this virus was selected very carefully, in order to reach countries that are considered to be America's rivals, such as China, Iran, and some EU countries including Italy. Many people think that there are pro-Russian tendencies in those countries, and this is why we see more infected people in those countries. I don't think that this is a mere coincidence. This is a scheme by the world's elites..."
https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/igor7.png
Interviewer: "The global government..."
Igor Nikulin: "Right. The global government is the correct term. At least that is what they call themselves. No one elected them but this is how they see themselves. These 200 families have $400 trillion, and they consider themselves to be the most important people on Earth. They own most of the media outlets. They are the ones making the Hollywood movies - for example, they make movies about pandemics. These families control the minds of humanity, and claim that humanity must be reduced to one-tenth of the current population."
[...]
Interviewer: "Is it really possible to produce biological weapons that target a specific nation or ethnic group, and that may infect them but not others? There were reports that the Israelis were thinking about producing - or have actually produced - some sort of biological weapon that kills Palestinians but does not harm other Israelis. Is it true? Is it possible?"
Igor Nikulin: "People talk about this. I know that a few years ago, there was a strange epidemic in Madagascar. It was not in Africa. It was a pneumonic plague, which is a horrible thing. This epidemic killed only the locals, while it did not harm European tourists and not even the yellow race. There is also, of course, weapons such as Ebola, Avian Influenza, and the coronavirus that is currently infecting mostly Chinese and other Asian peoples. Such weapons exist. In 1999, the Americans started a project... The head of the CIA at the time, George Tenet, and President Clinton said that they would produce pathogenic agents that would affect certain races but not others. Twenty years have passed and the time for field experiments has come. It seems that planet Earth has been turned into a testing ground. I'll go even further and say that the Anglo-Saxon countries have issued a biological warning to all non-English speaking countries: 'Either you live according to the laws we impose on you, or you will not live on this planet. Either we kill you fast or we kill you slowly.' This is the main problem of modern world policy."
https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/lenin-lie.jpg
Russian Biologist and Former U.N. Expert Igor Nikulin: Coronavirus Is a Biological Weapon Used by Global Government to Reduce the World's Population by 90% (https://www.memri.org/tv/russian-biologist-igor-nikulin-coronavirus-conspiracy-global-government-decimate-population)
On September 15, 2020, a high-level Chinese virologist who has fled the PRC under duress said China's government 'intentionally' released COVID-19 'I work[ed] in the WHO reference lab, which is the top coronavirus lab in the world.'
Chinese virologist: China's government 'intentionally' released COVID-19 (https://www.foxnews.com/media/chinese-virologist-government-intentionally-coronavirus)
The Russian expert seems to be more credible because he's not playing BLAME GAMES and correctly pointing to THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT ... which is how Russians refer to UN Agenda 2030 NEW WORLD ORDER ... whose admitted goal is to reduce global population 90%."
--
Related:
"It Will Happen In The Coming Months" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=ttH4-52xZgc&feature=emb_logo) 8:26
Hermoor
18th September 2020, 19:41
Thank you for your great posts. You see further than most.
ExomatrixTV
18th September 2020, 20:33
[Pseudo skeptic quote]: John you are a "Conspiracy Nut" [unquote]
~my response:
Yeah it “must” be total nuts that we have laws to put people in prison (jail) for conspiring … totally nuts is that … what were they thinking? … When two or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm is totally “science fiction” … the lawmakers must also be “conspiracy nuts” then.
Conspiracy Researchers studies Proven Conspiracy Facts and sometimes have “Theories” about KNOWN liars mixed with hard evidence of corruption, colluding, deceptions etc. … To label some one “Conspiracy Theorists” is to FALSELY ASSUME that some one ‘only’ cooks up “theories”.
This desperate need to control the narrative by MSM is part of mass dumbing down of a nation! Look up the word “Conspiracy” in any (LAW) Dictionary … then ask yourself is that “science fiction”? … When 2 or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm is that so “far fetched” … what MSM tries to do is you to be associated with certain people that are FAR from being a true researchers or being an honest conspiracy analyst.
The reason MSM never can share an honest representation of that what they attack is because they assume most will not verify their own sold claims & judgemental assumptions to them! So they count on you being lazy!
Ask any police officer if they are allowed to have a theory when they investigating a possible crime … just ask them please … Then you will realize how stupid the framing really is.
TV Series like: “Inspector Columbo” (Peter Falk) would be pretty BORING if he was not allowed to have several theories when he is investigating a possible crime(s) and/or criminal suspect(s). You see they DEMONIZE any critical thinking exposing Government Puppet Politicians, Corrupted Mainstream Media, Hijacked “Protecting Agencies”, Big Pharma Mafia, Banksters with their Giant Fiat Money Pyramid Ponzi Scheme etc.
There is nothing wrong having theories ... but it will get wrong (really bad) when MSM get never get a "fact check" when they spew theories & (rigged) "computer models" / 'predicting the future' scare monger tactics 24/7 ... When we occasionally do it, they falsely assume it is meant as "absolute" or "only one way of thinking" like as if it is a fact.
So they first FRAME us (using straw-man argument tactics) then claim we are "spreading misleading/deceptive" information that can have consequences for their #Agenda2030 "Global Governance" plans ... But when they (msm) have theories, it will be treated as such by "fact checkers sites" leaving them alone as the theories HELPS to push their agenda when they are NOT openly challenged!
Meanwhile they are the ones using obvious misleading/deceptive framing techniques to silence any form of real opposition/resistance.
cheers,
John Kuhles aka ExomatrixTV
What is worse? ... (Summarizing 2020) (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111519-What-is-worse-...--Summarizing-2020-)
Michael Moewes
19th September 2020, 09:31
And the remaining people will be utterly flushed away with Bill and Linda Gates's vaccine.
roguemoon
20th September 2020, 08:39
all brilliant posts on this thread, thank you all.
ExomatrixTV
27th September 2020, 14:23
A Message to New "Conspiracy Theorists":
K6RP8fEfpVU
So, it’s 2020 and you’ve fallen down the rabbit hole. Disorienting, isn’t it? Well, don’t worry: you are not alone. On this special edition of The Corbett Report, James Corbett welcomes all the newcomers to the reality-based community and gives them some tips and advice that he’s learned along the way about navigating this world of lies and cover ups.
Dr. William F. Pepper @ “9/11: Revealing the Truth / Reclaiming Our Future” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXgPnaQKcyw)
Truth At Last: The Assasination of Martin Luther King (https://www.corbettreport.com/mlk/)
COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity (https://www.corbettreport.com/covid911/)
TSA turns off naked body scanners to avoid opt-out day protests (https://www.naturalnews.com/030509_TSA_opt_out_day.html)
The Library of Alexandria is on Fire (https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-384-the-library-of-alexandria-is-on-fire/)
Can You Find This Video? (https://www.corbettreport.com/can-you-find-this-video)
A Brief History of False Flag Terror (https://www.corbettreport.com/a-brief-history-of-false-flag-terror/)
BOOK III of the Final Report of the Church Committee (https://rightsanddissent.org/resource/church-committee-final-report-book-iii-1976/)
Documents for Your Info Arsenal (https://www.corbettreport.com/corbett-report-radio-211-documents-for-your-info-arsenal/)
Corbett Report Documentaries (https://www.corbettreport.com/corbett-report-documentaries/)
History Is Written By The Winners (https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-350-history-is-written-by-the-winners/)
“history” search at Corbett Report (https://www.corbettreport.com/?s=history)
The CIA and the Media by Carl Bernstein (http://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php)
“The News” is a Social Construct. It is Used to Program You. (https://www.corbettreport.com/the-news-is-a-social-construct-it-is-used-to-program-you/)
>>> Study all 183+ very insightful comments here (https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-385-a-message-to-new-conspiracy-theorists/) :thumbsup:
Ewan
27th September 2020, 17:32
For example, Russian Biologist and Former U.N. Expert Igor Nikulin explained last February that COVID-19 is a Biological Weapon Used by Global Government to Reduce the World's Population.
Igor Nikulin: "I believe that it is no coincidence [that China was infected with coronavirus]. [B]I believe that this virus was selected very carefully, in order to reach countries that are considered to be America's rivals, such as China, Iran, and some EU countries including Italy. Many people think that there are pro-Russian tendencies in those countries, and this is why we see more infected people in those countries. I don't think that this is a mere coincidence. This is a scheme by the world's elites..."
Whilst I accept the overall premise of your entire post I find the above difficult to accept given the figures on https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/? under the sub-heading Reported Cases and Deaths by Country, Territory, or Conveyance
However, I have not bothered to research the ownership of linked website or the accuracy of figures therein.
The salient point remains, conspiracies are very real and always have been. You can often overhear people snorting derisively in respect of the subject and it is akin, to me, with the people who would rally round shouting 'Witch! Burn the witch!'
greybeard
27th September 2020, 17:53
I agree that conspiracy not a theory.
However, this virus may be the normal seasonal one --which is different every year but of the same family.
Depending on the source of the mortality rate quoted but there have been worse flu's
So if it was man made or doctored I would have thought that they would have released a much more deadly version.
It suits the fearmongering agenda to claim it was released from a laboratory rather than a normal seasonal event.
There is no real proof either way but professional saying no worse than seasonal flu which less face it kills millions of old and infirm and some not so.
Chris
Ernie Nemeth
28th September 2020, 16:29
They counted on the ignorance of the public, which is gargantuan.
Who has ever been aware of the rates of flu infection each year? Almost no one.
It was an easy conspiracy to play on the massive ignorance of the public, since they care not a whit to know anything, most even proud of their ignorance. Most are happy to concede to authority the benefit of the doubt, since they themselves are in that state constantly - unsure, uneducated, easily terrified.
Now we see how the managerial level is complicit, whether knowingly or not. That they themselves are not informed even though it is supposed to be their area of expertise. And the front line doctors, who are the ones responsible to the family of the infected, are not being listened to even though they are the ones saving the lives of the sick.
It is the incompetence of the managers, the ones wielding power, the ones not doing the work, the ones making the money, the ones with the status, the ones with the connections, that are purposely turning a deaf ear to their own staff. They know better but they also know who is buttering their bread - and it ain't the ones who know best.
A truly sad state of affairs. We are in the age of not only mediocrity but of incompetence. Only in the land of complete incompetence can such a fiasco ever have happened.
We need to stop learning what our employers want us to learn in school and start learning what we need to know or we are going to end up having all our thinking done for us very soon.
DaveToo
28th September 2020, 17:10
For example, Russian Biologist and Former U.N. Expert Igor Nikulin explained last February that COVID-19 is a Biological Weapon Used by Global Government to Reduce the World's Population.
Igor Nikulin: "I believe that it is no coincidence [that China was infected with coronavirus]. [B]I believe that this virus was selected very carefully, in order to reach countries that are considered to be America's rivals, such as China, Iran, and some EU countries including Italy. Many people think that there are pro-Russian tendencies in those countries, and this is why we see more infected people in those countries. I don't think that this is a mere coincidence. This is a scheme by the world's elites..."
Whilst I accept the overall premise of your entire post I find the above difficult to accept given the figures on https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/? under the sub-heading Reported Cases and Deaths by Country, Territory, or Conveyance
However, I have not bothered to research the ownership of linked website or the accuracy of figures therein.
Well if we take the Nikulin quote to be accurate, he was proven to be totally wrong.
Because at the time he would have made his quote COVID hadn't hit the U.S. yet.
Now surely the U.S. wouldn't want to hit its rivals and ITSELF!!!
Does that make any sense to what Nikulin was saying?
Agape
29th September 2020, 09:04
Someone asked “what’s worse”. What’s worse is the “conspiracy of intent”.
I think it’s where the original meaning of conspiracy starts. Con-spire , breath together. Perhaps not everyone speaks the same tongue and some can not talk but it takes blink of an eye to conspire.
Not longer than that - to approve or disprove the intent.
People all over the ages are born with different intents they seek to fulfil, consciously or subconsciously.
If you have mentioned the Covid 19 again, think of the pure malintent of those who ever created it and released it in order to disrupt global traffic.
Hence on it isn’t as important how many lives it took and affected predictably for years or how many people were spared, safely behind its timeline.
What matters is the idea -the intent- in someone’s mind that the virus could change something significantly , cause political upheaval , even collapse of whole states and infrastructures,
and kill as many people as possible.
However implausible such conspiracy theory seems - I’m sorry to remind you that the agenda and minds aligned with it does exist -from ideological to practical terms and it is feared even by most world governments.
We don’t know who are the people willing to conspire with either side of things because most people have not defined for themselves what would they accept and approve as Universal principles,
some rely on their religious or secular systems to define them better,
others simply never thought about it.
People have ascended to various heights and descended to various manners. Thus we have “free love vs promiscuity” , “organ donations vs organ trade”, “service to humanity & slave trade” and so and so forth. The tale of extreme polarities could go endless.
Conspiracy of Intent does not need words to start, especially if it’s natural, pro-freedom conspiracy.
Evil conspiracies on the other hand often require “re-education” or “being read” to a manual ( or a novel) picked by the ideologist.
There may be far more simple evil conspiracies of intent but those don’t get very far, usually.
So my “overall conspiracy theory” comes down to a basic observation of any conspiratorial fact shared mostly by natural breath unites and converges to human fact and observable theory on our space time crossings and we either confirm the intent and alignment- or not.
It happens on the minutest level of social manners, with or without talking.
The Intent ultimately matters the most.
In case of human conspiracy theories, there’s usually either
a/the intent to help others or
b/the intent to control them
and the two groups have many subgroups of course.
But nowadays the two groups rarely exist in pure form, they are more thoroughly mixed together so are humans and their manners.
So again I’d repeat, while definitions on outside may be difficult to agree on “for most of us”,
it’s the intent that matters.
🙏
araucaria
29th September 2020, 19:17
Thesis: Conspiracy is a pejorative word for what happens when two or more people are like-minded and, to some outside group, their like-mindedness is not in the best interests of a larger group.
Antithesis: If you have two groups, then you will have conspiracies. They will only disappear when everyone is in agreement over one particular thing.
Synthesis: like-mindedness (sometimes aka conspiracy) is our friend. To reach the next level, consider what is this one thing over which we can all agree? What do we mean by humanity? To what extent might it embrace ‘artificial intelligence’? To what extent are we justifiably held back by our ‘animal instincts’? To what extent are we UNjustifiably held back by our ‘animal instincts’? Etc.
Thesis 2: Intelligence can be manipulated so as to evolve.
Antithesis 2: Humanity is NOT/other than/contrary to intelligence.
Synthesis 2: Humanity is competent humanity. What works works: the definition of intelligence.
Thesis 3: Intelligence can be manipulated so as to evolve.
Antithesis 3: Humanity is intelligence in action.
Synthesis 3: Humanity is.
Thesis 4: Humanity is. Indestructible.
Agape
30th September 2020, 15:21
Conspiracy seems to depend on group intent then.
One person can conspire whatever they wish but for it to become theory
not to say valid theory more than one entity is required.
In jest, Life itself is the greatest conspiracy theorist in the Universe inventing multitudes of alternative forms and options some of whom are invalid.
In case of thinking Beings -like us- acknowledgement and purification of intent is
required in order to get rid off invalid options and conspiracy theories.
We are here to recognise and acknowledge our true meaning and intent.
We may get engaged in groups and lose our sovereignty and divert from our original intent.
Being part of it all is important but 99% of our real life we are alone in it and have to stand for ourselves.
And when I say we are alone in it I’m positive because the Universe and it’s intelligence are fully with us at that time.
101 is easy. There are no conflicts and no repetitions.
That’s until the Universe coinvents and summons say Martha to test and tempt you. You fall for Martha and start new conspiracy theory.
Off the board
🥏
Ernie Nemeth
6th October 2020, 17:44
You could say that all life conspires to remain alive.
DaveToo
6th October 2020, 18:18
Conspiracy seems to depend on group intent then.
One person can conspire whatever they wish but for it to become theory
not to say valid theory more than one entity is required.
You simply do not understand the meaning of the words conspiracy
and conspiracy theory by making that statement.
Let's take the first part of your statement:
"One person can conspire whatever they wish".
By definition one person can NEVER conspire on their own.
TWO people or more must conspire.
Now let's take the second part of your statement:
"but for it to become theory not to say valid theory more than one entity is required."
Wrong again.
A conspiracy does not "become a conspiracy theory".
A conspiracy is a conspiracy, end of story.
People may after the fact develop theories on the conspiracy or not, but that is entirely another matter.
Ernie Nemeth
6th October 2020, 18:51
But what if there was no conspiracy, just the theory that there was one?
DaveToo
6th October 2020, 19:14
But what if there was no conspiracy, just the theory that there was one?
Sure you could have that.
But I wasn't addressing that. I was addressing what Agape said specifically:
"Conspiracy seems to depend on group intent then.
One person can conspire whatever they wish but for it to become theory
not to say valid theory more than one entity is required."
Conspiracy doesn't become theory depending on how many people
conspired.
And it is never a conspiracy with one person planning a crime.
Ernie Nemeth
6th October 2020, 19:30
Is it fair to say then that :
To conspire is to gather together and make plans in secret with the willful intent of committing a crime. Collusion is the legal charge of committing the crime of conspiracy.
DaveToo
6th October 2020, 21:53
Is it fair to say then that :
To conspire is to gather together and make plans in secret with the willful intent of committing a crime. Collusion is the legal charge of committing the crime of conspiracy.
Absolutely, provided the "together" is two human beings.
Not one human and a cat or dog or budgie etc.
DaveToo
6th October 2020, 22:21
You could say that all life conspires to remain alive.
Is it a crime to remain alive?
Satori
6th October 2020, 22:22
But what if there was no conspiracy, just the theory that there was one?
As a legal matter, a conspiracy involves two or more people agreeing to commit an illegal or unlawful act and, then, one or more of the conspirators taking at least one overt step or action towards the completion of such act. The steps or actions taken towards completion of the intended illegal or unlawful act need not themselves be illegal or unlawful.
Conspiracy to commit a crime, coupled with at least one overt act in furtherance thereof, is itself a crime, even if the planned underlying crime is not carried out for whatever reason.
Consider: if I agree with at least one other person to rob a bank and under the agreement I am to lawfully obtain the getaway car and the other is to lawfully obtain a handgun, and we both do that and get in the car and drive to the bank with the intent to rob it, but before we rob the bank, someone else, who we do not know and never spoke to, robs the bank have I and my co-conspirator committed a crime in fact? In theory? Not at all?
Who would know of the conspiracy if we keep our mouths shut? But, even if no one knows, did we commit a crime and get away with it?
Should conspiracy be a crime standing alone?
By the way, there is such a thing as civil conspiracy where the wrongful act is not illegal or criminal, but rather wrongful as, for example, it harms someone’s civil interests.
DaveToo
6th October 2020, 22:58
Consider: if I agree with at least one other person to rob a bank and under the agreement I am to lawfully obtain the getaway car and the other is to lawfully obtain a handgun, and we both do that and get in the car and drive to the bank with the intent to rob it, but before we rob the bank, someone else, who we do not know and never spoke to, robs the bank have I and my co-conspirator committed a crime in fact? In theory? Not at all?
A crime in fact? Yes, the crime in this case was conspiracy to commit a crime.
In theory? No need to get into theories. If all the details you related were facts then yes a crime was committed.
Not at all? Yes a crime was committed.
Who would know of the conspiracy if we keep our mouths shut?
No one would know, but that doesn't mean a crime wasn't committed. They are two different things.
But, even if no one knows, did we commit a crime and get away with it?
Yes you did commit a crime, and you got away with the crime of conspiracy. You didn't get away with the crime of robbing a bank.
Should conspiracy be a crime standing alone?
According to your definition at the top conspiracy is a crime standing alone.
Old Student
6th October 2020, 23:46
Is it fair to say then that :
To conspire is to gather together and make plans in secret with the willful intent of committing a crime. Collusion is the legal charge of committing the crime of conspiracy.
No, the legal charge is conspiracy to commit xxxx (whatever the crime was). Collusion is not a legal term. And in order to be charged with conspiracy to commit, the group or an individual from the group has to take at least one definitive step to put the plan into action.
BTW, a "conspiracy theory" is a theory that a conspiracy exists to do something. If I believe that the PTB are conspiring to deprive me of my favorite brand of toothpaste in order to make me get cavities so their dentist can implant a listening device in me, that's a conspiracy theory, even if I'm the only one who believes it. Because my theory is that there's this conspiracy...
DaveToo
7th October 2020, 00:04
BTW, a "conspiracy theory" is a theory that a conspiracy exists to do something. If I believe that the PTB are conspiring to deprive me of my favorite brand of toothpaste in order to make me get cavities so their dentist can implant a listening device in me, that's a conspiracy theory, even if I'm the only one who believes it. Because my theory is that there's this conspiracy...
Love it! :)
araucaria
7th October 2020, 07:50
People get convicted for conspiracy all the time. The thing is real enough. Julius Caesar was murdered by a bunch of conspirators. The modern issue is based on whether a similar thing happened to JFK, not exactly murder in plain sight, but hidden in plain sight. ‘Conspiracy theory’ was invented by the CIA to cloud that issue.
Something that is definitely not theory, but for a long time hidden in plain sight behind the language of economics that few ordinary citizens understand at all, myself included, is the failure of capitalism; see this Guardian article from today: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/07/covid-19-crisis-boosts-the-fortunes-of-worlds-billionaires
The world’s billionaires “did extremely well” during the coronavirus pandemic, growing their already-huge fortunes to a record high of $10.2tn (£7.8tn). (…)
Stadler said billionaires typically have “significant risk appetite” and were confident to gamble some of their considerable fortunes.
Luke Hilyard, executive director of the High Pay Centre, a thinktank that focuses on excessive pay, said the “extreme wealth concentration is an ugly phenomenon from a moral perspective, but it’s also economically and socially destructive”.
“Billionaire wealth equates to a fortune almost impossible to spend over multiple lifetimes of absolute luxury,” Hilyard said. “Anyone accumulating riches on this scale could easily afford to raise the pay of the employees who generate their wealth, or contribute a great deal more in taxes to support vital public services, while remaining very well rewarded for whatever successes they’ve achieved.
“The findings from the UBS report showing that the super-rich are getting even richer are a sign that capitalism isn’t working as it should.”
Stadler said the fact that billionaire wealth had increased so much at a time when hundreds of millions of people around the world are struggling could lead to public and political anger. “Is there a risk they may be singled out by society? Yes,” he said. “Are they aware of it? Yes.”
Stadler has previously warned that the yawning inequality gap between rich and poor could lead to a “strike back”.
Billionaires’ fortunes have swelled by $4.2bn (or 70%) in the three years since Stadler warned about the threat of a global uprising against the super-rich. “We’re at an inflection point,” Stadler said. “Wealth concentration is as high as in 1905, this is something billionaires are concerned about. The problem is the power of interest on interest – that makes big money bigger and, the question is to what extent is that sustainable and at what point will society intervene and strike back?”
The world’s current super-rich people hold the greatest concentration of wealth since the US Gilded Age at the turn of the 20th century, when families such as the Carnegies, Rockefellers and Vanderbilts controlled vast fortunes.1905 saw the start of the Russian revolution… All this is not theory. We are at the end of a game of monopoly when only one player is enjoying it and it is time to clear the table and play something else. The question is: can we talk of a conspiracy among individuals of such unbelievable greed and selfishness? Well yes, when ‘families’ become a mafia looking after their collective/class interests. The point is that capitalists have honed their system into one of (class) solidarity that makes their imaginary monster enemy of collectivism look hopelessly inadequate.
It is asked, ‘At what point will society intervene and strike back?’ When the rest of society becomes united enough to con-spire (literally ‘breathe together’) on an altogether vaster scale, brush this tiny minority aside and reclaim those ten trillion that would put the world to rights. The challenge here is that this revolution on an unprecedented scale has to be carried out not by professional revolutionaries, but by people with the most traditional values of family, love hope & charity. The longer it takes, the harder it gets, or so it seems; because the longer it takes, the more totally inevitable it becomes. There comes an end point for soaking the poor, when you have to resort to soaking the destitute. When the destitute have no one who will employ them, they might well think there is a conspiracy afoot aimed at themselves and others. They are not wrong, for even if you prefer to call it ‘the system’ or ‘the establishment’, ‘western governments’, then there are still two types of people whose attitude is either to seek to undermine that iniquitous system or to uphold it. The pejorative term ’conspiracy theory’ is the other side’s phrase to describe the opposition as infiltrated by them. They prefer it to the word ‘society’ – ‘there is no such thing as society’ said Thatcher. But of course there is; or at least there will be, very soon.
ExomatrixTV
7th October 2020, 09:55
I Am A Conspiracy Theorist
h-p5mQmmf9M
Show notes: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=38025
If you are afraid of being called a conspiracy theorist, then those words are having their intended effect. I will not censor myself to appeal to the Normie McNormiesons of the world. Yes, sometimes I theorize about conspiracies. And guess what? So do you! Now let's discuss some evidence, shall we?
Ernie Nemeth
11th October 2020, 17:58
For a higher life form to exist it must have a conspiracy of trillions of lesser lifeforms. As a matter of fact, it could be said that the entire universe conspired together to bring about the conditions necessary for life.
If all life is a conspiracy, who is the conspirator?
araucaria
11th October 2020, 19:11
James Corbett: Yes and no.
Denotation: “‘Conspiracy theorist’ describes someone who theorizes about some conspiracy.”
Connotation: ‘wild-eyed crazy’ means someone who all at once believes that the CIA killed JFK, that the moon landings were faked, that 911 was an inside job, that the Pope is a paedophilic Satanist, the president a reptilian shapeshifter…. the whole caboodle, including the endless provably fake stuff touted by the three-letter agencies themselves. Everyone is tarred with the same brush.
My example for some time has been Al Qaeda as a crime syndicate. Anything and everything that happens is ascribed to a single collective perpetrator, including the actions of poor psychiatric cases unable to get out of their own brainboxes.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?30405-Here-and-Now...What-s-Happening&p=1380340&viewfull=1#post1380340
This works both ways: the conspiracy theorist is treated in the same way: if you have any doubt about any subject, then you belong to the conspiracy syndicate. You automatically believe everything, from the way out stuff that the likes of the CIA themselves mass produce, to the very specific stuff that you are seeking to address. This is like the lowest common denominator, which counter-intuitively is a rather high number.
This is why I say the way forward is through the courts. This is where all the generalizations stop. CCC: Crime, Culprit, Circumstance. X is accused of Y, by means of Z. Customized justice.
All generalizations stop? No: you have class actions, whereby multiple victims form a syndicate. A class action means that X is accused of Y, by means of Z, to the detriment of A, but also, in parallel, B-W. Conspiracy theory is the next step in this process, positing multiple culprits with multiple victims. See this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?112489-Crimes-Against-Humanity&p=1382348&viewfull=1#post1382348).
Matthew
10th March 2023, 01:03
This might not belong in this thread but it's hopefully close enough :Angel:
https://twitter.com/michaelpbreton/status/1633977072258351104
Our politicians have a super power.
They can avoid answering any question.
They learned how to do this in Grade 11 debating class.
They will not save us.
___
We will save ourselves.
Non-compliance to a Digital ID and CBDC.
This is just the beginning.
theworldresponds.com
The link in the tweet goes to www.theworldresponds.com
To see the progress we are making here in Canada, and around the world, please visit
www.theworldresponds.com.
There, you will also find a digital copy of this pamphlet.
Ps. This video might help connect some dots as to what is going on behind the scenes.
It is about 1 hour long. It is called “Monopoly - Who Owns the World”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qQc2K92poC6w/
If you would like to support this movement in any way or you have any questions, drop us a line at
build@theworldresponds.com
https://www.theworldresponds.com/pamphlet
That links to this bitchute video that I thought was a nice little documentary. I doubt it will tell anyone here anything they don't already know, but I thought the pamphlet was quite good as well as the video.
qQc2K92poC6w
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.