SORCHA FAAL...disinfo agent

[shiva777]

Sorcha Faal: Intelligence Briefs or Disinformation? How To Tell the Difference
January 14, 2011 by Alex
Filed under U.S. News
18 Comments
Editors Note: Thanks to Philip for writing this much needed article!

With certain people within my circle of contacts being suckered by Sorcha Faal / EU Times articles, I feel it is time to deal with the whole messy subject of intelligence sources.

Philip Brennan | PhilipBrennan.net


Before I go into this subject in any great depth, I would first like to deal with Sorcha Faal, otherwise known as David Booth of the CIA. David Booth works within the Central Intelligence Agency in COINTELPRO. Other western intelligence agencies known for using COINTELPRO methods include MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and the think-tank, DEMOS. To be quite blunt, all intelligence agencies have their own COINTELPRO departments.

http://theintelhub.com/2011/01/14/sorcha-faal-intelligence-briefs-or-disinformation-how-to-tell-the-difference/

[ThePythonicCow]

http://theintelhub.com/2011/01/14/sorcha-faal-intelligence-briefs-or-disinformation-how-to-tell-the-difference/Unfortunately that link no longer works. The site "theintelhub.com" no longer seems to have any pages when you search on it for Sorcha Faal.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Here's a link that still seems to work: http://www.philipbrennan.net/2011/01/14/intelligence-briefs-or-disinformation-how-to-tell-the-difference/

[Bill Ryan]

-------

Yes, this works (and is well worth reading):

http://philipbrennan.net/2011/01/14/intelligence-briefs-or-disinformation-how-to-tell-the-difference

Despite my occasional differences with Shiva777, Sorcha Faal is one issue about which we can violently agree. :)

[slvrfx]

I believe with Sorcha Faal you also have to shed a lot of what is in the reports (I've been reading them for a few years), but I've noticed there is truth embedded. Just have to read between the lines.

I've also noted that what is in the reports, usually comes out in the media in the following few days, and I don't mean a repeat of what Sorcha says, but genuine news/events.

(Haha...just had an image pop into my head...yuck gross...sorry...but imagine combing out someone's hair with one of those 'headlice combs', and watching the few lice fall to the ground.)

That's the image I get when I think about Sorcha. (Get past the imagery and understand how there are bits and pieces of important info in those reports.)

[majapahit]

.. I've noticed there is truth embedded. Just have to read between the lines.
Indeed.
I read Faal diligently for this reason.
Of course I do not trust this source. I do not fully trust any source.
The ballpark is, that even the best intelligence source, will only report 85% truth.

Even good & trusted sources will 'lie' when they need to 'compromise themselves', I've noticed.

They do this, I deduced after several incident, to 'keep alive'. :help:
Sorcha Faal of course is a very strange creature, I use his info only, to get weird information from - his/her - even weirder angles.

Then I will search (or wait) until corroboration pops up somewhere.
This may take a while (months) but something (weird) will (often) show in the news.
And I've found, the 'subjects' Faal comes up with are pretty worthwhile.

The most recent incident: the shooting in Arizona

1. it's MKUltra all over the place (I found out later), somewhat of a ritual slaughter, sort of
2. it's Sorcha Faal who draws attention to the killed Judge John Roll, perhaps more important than the Senator
3. that's a worthwhile announcement

[Barron]

Also Agreed. A long long time ago i very quickly realised that the material put forth was utter intentional disinfo, just as is the disinfo from Benjamin Fulford and also the late Christopher Story (Edward Harle.)

[chelmostef]

Also Agreed. A long long time ago i very quickly realised that the material put forth was utter intentional disinfo, just as is the disinfo from Benjamin Fulford and also the late Christopher Story (Edward Harle.)

Perhaps with the latter two the premise is to invoke a sit back its gonna be ok we are sorting it out mentality.

Rather than we need to act now ourselves and stop waiting for someone else mentality, which if you have the wrong information will not help either.

Just a theory.

[Psychonautilus]

I have always felt similarly about Sorcha Faal - the 'Tabloid' of the alternative media. It's always the most sensationalistic claims, rarely ever corroborated by anyone else, always referring to 'reports circulating the Kremlin' as the source - and always drawing the most outrageous conclusions. Sorcha Faal seems to take interesting stories from current events and paper-maché them together into the most extreme scenario possible, making statements and drawing conclusions that are based almost entirely on the significance of contrived connections between fact and fiction. It's classic disinfo - a little bit of truth dressed up in a whole lot of fiction, the story changing everyday, never trying to push or maintain any one perspective, only to divert, distract and eventually contaminate an issue with so much questionable material that it loses its significance.

People get distracted, running down one rabbit hole after another, never finding 'the smoking gun', and so eventually lose interest and decide that the entire issue is completely worthless. The topic turns to one of ridicule - equation complete. I would say there are probably other websites run covertly by the same source, running with the same basic story outline but changing some of the key details to provide dichotomy within a single trend.

I still visit there regularly though, like I do the BBC news page - but only get a snapshot of where the spin is at today and in what direction they'll be herding everyone tomorrow. There is very little actionable information on Sorcha Faal though, as it is mostly one hollywood doomsday scenario after another, each apparently contradicting the former. You'd think the CIA could come up with better web design though?

Benjamin Fulford is another interesting character. David Wilcock often refers to him as a prime source and seems to believe whatever he is told by Fulford. I get the distinct impression that Wilcock has his own personal belief systems, and goes to Fulford to be told exactly what he wants to hear. The end result is that Obama is some misunderstood hero pushing for disclosure and world peace, China is fighting the NWO with the assistance of ET's, the Rothschilds are actually misrepresented and are on 'our side' and every single world event is related to formal disclosure by a major government.

Whether Fulford is a paid agent or whether he is simply making some cash by publishing every bit of gossip that comes his way, who knows. Regardless of this, I think that all three of these sources tend to publish some of the more sensationalistic and questionable material out there, drawing some of the most uncorroborated and unsubstantiated conclusions. There is often a level of commonality between their stories and reports, and I have wondered if they're getting their information from a common source, or group of sources.

Don't get me wrong, I think Wilcock honestly believes in his material and his message, and his heart is definitely in the right place - but even his good friend Richard Hoagland has openly stated that David will believe just about anyone who claims to be an 'insider'. When someone is publishing material that conveys a set of belief systems, it is really not that difficult to make sure that person comes across information in support of what they want to believe. A few anonymous emails from 'different sources' all corroborating the same story? Piece of cake.

[str8thinker]

Benjamin Fulford is another interesting character. David Wilcock often refers to him as a prime source and seems to believe whatever he is told by Fulford. I get the distinct impression that Wilcock has his own personal belief systems, and goes to Fulford to be told exactly what he wants to hear. The end result is that Obama is some misunderstood hero pushing for disclosure and world peace, China is fighting the NWO with the assistance of ET's, the Rothschilds are actually misrepresented and are on 'our side' and every single world event is related to formal disclosure by a major government.

Whether Fulford is a paid agent or whether he is simply making some cash by publishing every bit of gossip that comes his way, who knows. Regardless of this, I think that all three of these sources tend to publish some of the more sensationalistic and questionable material out there, drawing some of the most uncorroborated and unsubstantiated conclusions. There is often a level of commonality between their stories and reports, and I have wondered if they're getting their information from a common source, or group of sources.

Don't get me wrong, I think Wilcock honestly believes in his material and his message, and his heart is definitely in the right place - but even his good friend Richard Hoagland has openly stated that David will believe just about anyone who claims to be an 'insider'. When someone is publishing material that conveys a set of belief systems, it is really not that difficult to make sure that person comes across information in support of what they want to believe. A few anonymous emails from 'different sources' all corroborating the same story? Piece of cake.

Hear, hear. An excellent summing up.

See also this thread on David Wilcock (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1948).

[majapahit]

February 3, 2011, "Top CIA Spy Takes Over Deadly Egyptian Protests"

sample of Faal report
"US President Barack Obama phoned Mubarak on February 1st ordering the Egyptian dictator to allow this CIA takeover of Egyptian military and police forces"

so this report is sent out from the Faal servers in Langley, VA, home of ..

but it's non the less rather interesting, I'd say,
and that's why I keep reading them, mt

EDIT:
I do suspect Faal to be 'set up' for a major disinformation in the future, f.i. when 'ET arrives'

in the mean time, be you own "Russia desk" and enjoy

[Gwen]

.. I've noticed there is truth embedded. Just have to read between the lines.
Indeed.
I read Faal diligently for this reason.
Of course I do not trust this source. I do not fully trust any source.
The ballpark is, that even the best intelligence source, will only report 85% truth.

Even good & trusted sources will 'lie' when they need to 'compromise themselves', I've noticed.

They do this, I deduced after several incident, to 'keep alive'. :help:
Sorcha Faal of course is a very strange creature, I use his info only, to get weird information from - his/her - even weirder angles.

Then I will search (or wait) until corroboration pops up somewhere.
This may take a while (months) but something (weird) will (often) show in the news.
And I've found, the 'subjects' Faal comes up with are pretty worthwhile.

The most recent incident: the shooting in Arizona

1. it's MKUltra all over the place (I found out later), somewhat of a ritual slaughter, sort of
2. it's Sorcha Faal who draws attention to the killed Judge John Roll, perhaps more important than the Senator
3. that's a worthwhile announcement

Absolutely - I listen to Kevin Smith and he did a programme about Sorcha Faal. He said one insider told him some information that he has never revealed to protect the source. Sorcha did an article and embedded in it was the exact piece of information he had been given. He concludes that, to use his words, we throw the baby out with the bath water and assume that because some of the info is so easily discredited, we disbelieve all of it when some of it is spot on.

It seemed logical to me, I'd just like to know who they are passing the info to if its a little game? Is it that things that have already crept out into the public eye are 'debunked' through this method?

And yes, we heard here that it was Judge Roll who was shot first.

[majapahit]

.. I'd just like to know who they are passing the info to if its a little game? Is it that things that have already crept out into the public eye are 'debunked' through this method?
Across the board, leaks to 'public access' seems to be generated with 'mass psychology' in mind,
that what used to be a subset of 'propaganda' (remember Hitler's boys) when there was a simpler and naive era, a long time ago
(and like later; the cold war, all fake, and 'arranged' by banking).

Present days are more 'sophisticated' mind tricks,
of the kind they use to manipulate elections with and 'public perception' of policy.

And is derived from decades of marketing, and analysis of consumer and public 'behaviour',
elevated to the 'high' science of persuasion, seduction & manipulation, studied and taught at numerous 'think tanks' manned with Phd's and published to subscribers only.

Keep in mind though, the standard demographic for main stream TV is the mind of a 14 year old
(at least that what I was thought couple of decades ago :) ),
and they can only pull off present day idiocy by means of almost complete control of mass media outlets and the advertising budgets.

Concerning Faal, because of it's weird character,
it seems to be targeted at a public with a more 'esoteric' weak spot. Informed, but not quite informed. The lesser crowd that wonders into conspiracy forums (you).
The dangerous open minds of a curious electorate, with a willingness to find things out, who can influence others because of their findings.

If and when Faal is used for manipulation, 'they' will want the biggest bang for their buck in that demographic.

Biggest shelf of the bookstore next to the Pentagon seems to be the 'occult' section .. so, contrary what an ignorant public would expect, i'ts targeted at an 'intelligence' crowd, curious about 'intelligence', at the very ends of the bellcurve of the superbowl masses.

These'll need a lot of persuasion.
That'll need a lot of enticement. :suspicious:

Hence, many cookies, with little white sugar, is my viewpoint,
and to stay 1 step ahead, always be ready to dismiss meanderings, mt. :cool: