Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

[TravelerJim]

“Good evening, Congressman. Just thought I'd pass word that >15% of the officers at my command will either retire early or resign their commissions if the mandate is given.”


1417096540074565636
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1417096540074565636

Which is part of the plan, right??? More room for Biden folks, weakens the military for China, etc.....

[Arcturian108]

This video was just sent to me, and raises the possibility that in the first round of shots very few, maybe 20% actually got the vaccines, while 80% might have gotten only a saline solution. Very cagey reasoning on the part of the elite.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-the-vaxxed-are-acting-strange-and-why-it-will-get-even-worse_SJodfm8VOFUrl8m.html

[RunningDeer]

This video was just sent to me, and raises the possibility that in the first round of shots very few, maybe 20% actually got the vaccines, while 80% might have gotten only a saline solution. Very cagey reasoning on the part of the elite.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-the-vaxxed-are-acting-strange-and-why-it-will-get-even-worse_SJodfm8VOFUrl8m.html


WHY THE VAXXED ARE ACTING STRANGE - AND WHY IT WILL GET EVEN WORSE (19 min)

https://bnt-cdn.b-cdn.net/upload/videos/2021/07/trXR7ZLu8g3APKhQwJU4_21_a5d0e9e9ee35179f95c4ee4193f37676_video_480p_converted.mp4

[Constance]

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

[mojo]

Listening to this CNN host Mika give her alter call. This is so disturbing and listen closely how she vocalizes each word it's like a mocking. In one breath she talks about God and the other calling the former President bloated. CNN does not bring God into any other current serious issues like the crime wave or the border crisis. Its very odd, think about what audience is Mika trying to reach? She really can't hide her disgust of we the deplorables. This was just the opening but the title says it all "Antibodies And T-Cells Are More Beneficial Than The Vaccine," so why don't the MSM push other alternatives? Are they stupid? There is more to the Covid vax than they are telling us and their actions prove it.
Just a side note and connection...This morning looking at the Avalon titles to threads I'm still concerned about censorship, the deep state would not like what we are saying thats obvious by the titles.

https://rumble.com/vk8rxe-antibodies-and-t-cells-are-more-beneficial-than-the-vaccine.html

vhmls4

[Gracy]

Listening to this CNN host Mika give her alter call. This is so disturbing and listen closely how she vocalizes each word it's like a mocking.
vhmls4

Of note: Mika Brzezinski is a talking head over at MSNBC (not CNN), but of course that network's main reason for existence is to carry water for democrats, at all cost.

The sneering and mocking is simply part of their job description, same as for the talking heads over at FOX on the flip side of the coin.

Unfortunately it's to be expected in cable "news"...

[mojo]

Gracy May, It's sad we have come to expect this. I'm sure your old enough to remember when the news was a little more fair? What happened, were we asleep at the wheel?

[Gracy]

Gracy May, It's sad we have come to expect this. I'm sure your old enough to remember when the news was a little more fair? What happened, were we asleep at the wheel?

Sure mojo, a little more fair, but it's easy to let "Operation Mockingbird's" CIA Infiltration of the media to sort of, get lost in the big ship's disappearing wake so to speak. I think they probably had to at least put on more of a veneer of impartiality and objectivity way back when, although in part because there were just so many news outlets at the time, and they had to please a very diversified audience.

These days there are so many outlets that look to please only a certain demographic for the almighty bread and butter ratings, that they know they pretty much have a captive audience tuning in to hear the good word every day. So long as they keep on pleasing that certain demographic, the dollars keep on a rollin in.

And surely, our friends at the CIA didn't just pack up their bags, and move on to other things after the Church Committee hearings back in the 70's.

To me, it's looking pretty darn blatant these days, but so long as the message pleases the audience, gives them what they want to hear, it's highly unlikely they will care to notice.

[Delight]

I see that this is a GLOBAL effort and IMO it is intended genocide... not just our bodies but the whole civilization. Genocide is over everything the plan to completely obliterate a whole people.


Are The Elite Trying To Kill Us Off? (Truth Warrior) (https://rokfin.com/stream/7216)
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.” - Stanford Professor , Paul Ehrlich, 'The Population Bomb' written in 1968 My site: https://www.dwtruthwarrior.com

[TravelerJim]

Is this what we are up against?

https://gizadeathstar.com/2021/07/injectable-brain-reading-nanosensors/

From Joseph Farrell in this column:

"One would have to be willfully irrational not to see a connection between claims that mRNA injections are an "operating system" and the creation of "nano swarms" capable of (1) passing the blood-brain barrier and (2) reading individual neuronal activity and (3) transmitting the results. And one would have to be similarly willfully irrational not to see another possibility: if it's possible for these nano-swarms to broadcast from inside the skull, it is also by parity of reasoning possible to broadcast to them."

So folks, looks like one way or another the current version of humanity is done gone. If THEY have a plan to replace it, what is our plan to replace it and what do we replace it with? It doesn't seem like the status quo can stand up to this sort of technology.

And where is our horsepower derived from to take these guys on and have our plan the "winning" plan????

[Arcturian108]

Just got this from a friend:
This is part of an article written in 2015 about all of our vaccines....I've highlighted this part as it fits into today's problems/questions about vaccines...link to the full article at the end...WOW.
"Some time ago I was out-of-body and was witnessing a routine alien abduction taking place at night in a neighborhood somewhere. I saw a man being lifted into a ship where he was given a medical exam and I was aware that these ETs were making the rounds and contacting a number of people they had done this with before.
They apparently were working on developing a vaccine that could prevent a certain type of disease, and their reasons for doing this were nefarious. They are working on developing a series of advanced vaccines so they can use these as bargaining chips to gain more of a foothold here because if we appear to be allowing their intervention through a sharing of resources, this opens the gateway for more of their plans to unfold legally within the galactic community.
They can’t be here unless invited but because they are currently establishing this kind of engagement through back channels and in a clandestine manner, we could end up with more of our freedoms being given away in exchange for such technology without even knowing it.
Suppose a secret deal is made for a vaccine that will be passed off as a human invention, and yet, even as effective as it might be for preventing or curing a disease, the vaccine itself is like a form of ET resonance that, once injected acts as a badge of acceptance that we are agreeing to their presence in our reality. Such a vaccine could further attune us to the reality of those who seek to control us by changing our resonance to become more alike to theirs, making us more susceptible to the influence of their minds. It is like a trojan horse being injected right into our bodies.
I know this sounds far out, but there are many ways in which certain ETs are seeking to entice humanity through back channels with the promise of advanced technology, and the elements of our governments or secret governments that are involved have very little discernment about what they are actually dealing with.
The push for vaccines is, in part, a reaction to the anti-vaccine movement, but I have to wonder if there is more going on with both sides of this debate. The vaccine push might be trying to gear us up for the introduction of alien vaccines, and the anti-vaccine movement might represent something that is intuitive in nature — not just a reaction to the fraud in the system, but a sense that there is something ominous about where the vaccine moment is going.
Again, I believe that we must use a combination of research and intuition to assess the cost/benefit analysis of any medical technology. We are not yet collectively at a stage of human evolution where everyone can just never take vaccines again. At least some of them may still serve a purpose at this stage, and there may yet be new vaccines in the future that have an important role to play, but we must be very cautious, knowledgeable, and vigilant against manipulation through fear."

http://www.theschoolofmanifestation.com/the-end-of-vaccines/

[Delight]

Great info all together

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7LYeSGVcAAna3q?format=jpg&name=large

[RunningDeer]

Great info all together



Delight, do you recall the address for the image? Thanks in advance. :wave:

[Delight]

Great info all together



Delight, do you recall the address for the image? Thanks in advance. :wave:

I think I found it on the "Covid Vaccine Victims Chat" on telegram but there was no address posted with it... one thing frustrating at times with telegram posts.

I did find this online with some of the authors and that's all I found?

ACUTE COVID-19: THERAPEUTIC PLAN IN THE INITIAL OR NASAL AND PHARYNGEAL STAGE. PART I. NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL MEASURES. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344885784_ACUTE_COVID-19_THERAPEUTIC_PLAN_IN_THE_INITIAL_OR_NASAL_AND_PHARYNGEAL_STAGE_PART_I_NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL_MEASURES)

[RunningDeer]

Great info all together



Delight, do you recall the address for the image? Thanks in advance. :wave:

I think I found it on the "Covid Vaccine Victims Chat" on telegram but there was no address posted with it... one thing frustrating at times with telegram posts.

I did find this online with some of the authors and that's all I found?

ACUTE COVID-19: THERAPEUTIC PLAN IN THE INITIAL OR NASAL AND PHARYNGEAL STAGE. PART I. NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL MEASURES. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344885784_ACUTE_COVID-19_THERAPEUTIC_PLAN_IN_THE_INITIAL_OR_NASAL_AND_PHARYNGEAL_STAGE_PART_I_NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL_MEASURES)

Thanks, Delight. I was hoping to find the original image and see if I could enlarge it. The other one is too distorted.

http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/smilies/write.gif No wait...on second look, I'm using my other computer this morning. I'm able to enlarge the screen/your image on this one. Either that or maybe it was my tired eyes @ 1:30 am. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[Tintin]

Just got this from a friend:
This is part of an article written in 2015 about all of our vaccines....I've highlighted this part as it fits into today's problems/questions about vaccines...link to the full article at the end...WOW.

"Suppose a secret deal is made for a vaccine that will be passed off as a human invention, and yet, even as effective as it might be for preventing or curing a disease, the vaccine itself is like a form of ET resonance that, once injected acts as a badge of acceptance that we are agreeing to their presence in our reality. Such a vaccine could further attune us to the reality of those who seek to control us by changing our resonance to become more alike to theirs..."

"The vaccine push might be trying to gear us up for the introduction of alien vaccines, and the anti-vaccine movement might represent something that is intuitive in nature — not just a reaction to the fraud in the system, but a sense that there is something ominous about where the vaccine moment is going.

We are not yet collectively at a stage of human evolution where everyone can just never take vaccines again."

http://www.theschoolofmanifestation.com/the-end-of-vaccines/

How very interesting - a little synchronicity here.

On my way walking to work this morning I was struck by the thought that if all disease were eradicated (through vaccines) then that would be the end of 'humanity', as it'd render the immune system likely no more (or at best redundant), leading to a completely new 'being' likely of. or by, ET design.

There's some really fascinating insights in this article for me to follow up more closely on.

[RunningDeer]

Just got this from a friend:
This is part of an article written in 2015 about all of our vaccines....I've highlighted this part as it fits into today's problems/questions about vaccines...link to the full article at the end...WOW.

"Suppose a secret deal is made for a vaccine that will be passed off as a human invention, and yet, even as effective as it might be for preventing or curing a disease, the vaccine itself is like a form of ET resonance that, once injected acts as a badge of acceptance that we are agreeing to their presence in our reality. Such a vaccine could further attune us to the reality of those who seek to control us by changing our resonance to become more alike to theirs..."

"The vaccine push might be trying to gear us up for the introduction of alien vaccines, and the anti-vaccine movement might represent something that is intuitive in nature — not just a reaction to the fraud in the system, but a sense that there is something ominous about where the vaccine moment is going.

We are not yet collectively at a stage of human evolution where everyone can just never take vaccines again."

http://www.theschoolofmanifestation.com/the-end-of-vaccines/

How very interesting - a little synchronicity here.

On my way walking to work this morning I was struck by the thought that if all disease were eradicated (through vaccines) then that would be the end of 'humanity', as it'd render the immune system likely no more (or at best redundant), leading to a completely new 'being' likely of. or by, ET design.

There's some really fascinating insights in this article for me to follow up more closely on.

For the last seven+ years I’ve had a sense that my body is going through metamorphic changes. I don’t mean it in a bad way from alteration of our food, water, air and mind, or the natural aging process. Feedback from family confirms the outward youthful changes.

From the larger perspective, it’s more an inconvenience. Fortunately, I don’t have a schedule to keep. I’m slowly moving with the changes through research, intuition, and tweaking what my body seems to require or no longer requires.

I could be wrong in what I'm doing. I figure life is about experiences and experimentation.

[Delight]

Just got this from a friend:
This is part of an article written in 2015 about all of our vaccines....I've highlighted this part as it fits into today's problems/questions about vaccines...link to the full article at the end...WOW.

"Suppose a secret deal is made for a vaccine that will be passed off as a human invention, and yet, even as effective as it might be for preventing or curing a disease, the vaccine itself is like a form of ET resonance that, once injected acts as a badge of acceptance that we are agreeing to their presence in our reality. Such a vaccine could further attune us to the reality of those who seek to control us by changing our resonance to become more alike to theirs..."

"The vaccine push might be trying to gear us up for the introduction of alien vaccines, and the anti-vaccine movement might represent something that is intuitive in nature — not just a reaction to the fraud in the system, but a sense that there is something ominous about where the vaccine moment is going.

We are not yet collectively at a stage of human evolution where everyone can just never take vaccines again."

http://www.theschoolofmanifestation.com/the-end-of-vaccines/

How very interesting - a little synchronicity here.

On my way walking to work this morning I was struck by the thought that if all disease were eradicated (through vaccines) then that would be the end of 'humanity', as it'd render the immune system likely no more (or at best redundant), leading to a completely new 'being' likely of. or by, ET design.

There's some really fascinating insights in this article for me to follow up more closely on.

For the last seven+ years I’ve had a sense that my body is going through metamorphic changes. I don’t mean it in a bad way from alteration of our food, water, air and mind, or the natural aging process. Feedback from family confirms some of the outward appearance.

From the larger perspective, it’s more an inconvenience. Fortunately, I don’t have a schedule to keep. I’m slowly moving with the changes through research, intuition, and tweaking what my body seems to require or no longer requires.

I could be wrong in what I'm doing. I figure life is about experiences and experimentation.

I have been in a place of a very different POV about the body since 1992. IMO my body healed itself after a major abdominal surgery where the surgeon thought I would have absorption isses... difficulty gaining weight. HAHA... NOT. BUT I still have physical issues like migraines that feel like a buzzy energy starting outside the body. I am sure that we are at a juncture concerning our choice of being!!! Lots of people do not seem to feel that the body is a major instrument of consciousness FOR us to learn HOW it may be experienced WAY WAY more beautifully and magically (since advanced technology looks like magic).

What I just do NOT understandd is HOW with all the evidence from people who have shown the way, we as a whole still act like "Maybe" we do have powers we do not use. Is this an alien program to block our inner knowing?

And maybe the simulation is that we must forge ahead alone?

When I hear about the grey aliens who lost their feeling body, I am more and more sure that this IS our personal trajectory as a group of humanity divorced from one self. Use it or lose it?

I am interested in the idea that each of us is fractal so I do not have to wait for the collective. Wim Hof and Joe Dispenza and others are in my life and FOR FREE online (so far not censored) I CAN find out all the pointers of tech I need to begin reimagining being a "super feeler", a superior empath, a supra-mental genius of being a human.

WHY do (many more than we think) people "enjoy" being ill? That is something TRUE. It gives people an excuse to back off of the "rat race". People do not believe we have the right to state in whole health and with sound mind and body... "NO THANKS, NO, NOT interested, I am perfectly happy already. I do not need to fix anything"......

Those of us who give ourselves permission to DELIBERATELY IN JOY GIVE UP The whole story of


a schedule to keep. I’m slowly moving with the changes through research, intuition, and tweaking what my body seems to require or no longer requires.

I could be wrong in what I'm doing. I figure life is about experiences and experimentation.

You and I and all of us are RIGHT ON. the medicine is more humor, more leisure, more allowing and that our choices ARE what matters (LITERALLY PEOPLE ON THE FENCE falling one way or t'other)

[RunningDeer]

NEUROLOGICAL ISSUES AFTER PFIZER KILL SHOT -
HOSPITALIZED FOR 2 WEEKS AND STILL THIS BAD (1 min)

9dLtukKjPzA3

[meat suit]

Anti-vaxxers go plant-based as law firm says it could be illegal to force Covid jab on vegans

https://www.rt.com/uk/530667-britain-covid19-vegan-vaccine/

[Matthew]

Should a Covid-19 vaccine be a condition for Aliyah?
What is the right thing to do when there are so many conflicting expert opinions/studies regarding taking the vaccine against the virus?
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/310889

Dr. Sam Minskoff, a licensed clinical psychologist and Aliyah consultant at Arutz Sheva, talks about the need to discern truth from research regarding the corona virus and taking the vaccine.

This can be a difficult and challenging task with so many experts giving conflicting opinions and studies on the subject.
...

[Bassplayer1]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'

[Bill Ryan]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'Wow. :flower: There are definitely personality changes sometimes — or maybe often. A reminder about this thread:


Personality changes in vaxxed people (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115247-Personality-changes-in-vaxxed-people)

In his new video published yesterday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68B1gtPnGlA), Chris Martenson drew attention to this piece of pure undiluted nastiness. Go figure. :facepalm: (He wryly pointed out that re "logging off before he said something ugly", it was maybe a little too late.)

https://projectavalon.net/James_Newburrie_tweet.gif

[Gracy]

I watched that latest Chris Martenson video last night, very informative as usual! Regarding the tweet above, I believe he used that just as one example of harshness, but overall he was talking about both sides squaring off against each other, and how it doesn't need to be that way.

In this recent excellent video, Chris goes into great detail about how we are ALL being manipulated into being against each other; divide and and conquer: (25 minutes)
sqjIfwCYS1g

[happyuk]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'

I understand how you're feeling BassPlayer. I don't think I've ever felt so alone.
I do security-cleared contracting for large defence organizations, where save for a few individuals, taking the vaccine has become pretty much de rigueur.
It's not the taking of the vaccine I have an issue with, because it's personal medical decision, as it should be.

It's the smugness and self-satisfaction (and worse!) that usually goes with it.
Taking an untested medicine just so I can enter a venue or for the privilege of being able to sup beer in a warm country is something I will never get used to. I don't so much as raise the subject and feign indifference whenever the subject does arise.

Career-wise, many of these people are at the absolute top of their game being bright, articulate, highly-skilled systems engineers, software developers, solutions architects, mathematicians and so on. These are not fools.

But I guess if there are qualities I have (or at least I like to think I have), that they have yet to cultivate, is that I know my limitations and have an intuition that will tell me when something is not right. I don't know what this will do in the longer term, but then neither do they.

[Constance]

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

[RunningDeer]

Thanks, Constance.http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/smilies/hug-hi-five.gif Good 14 minute video and resource link.

FreedomTaker.com (https://www.freedomtaker.com) - online resources for downloadable documents:

Vaccination Notice and Acceptance of Liability by the vaccination Providers
notice to Healthcare Provider
Parental Authority over Medical Treatment
Vaccine Conditional Acceptance
Refusal of Vaccines
Refusal of Medial Testing
For Employers Who Try and Coerce Vaccination
Vaccine Injury Table
Notice of Liability for Unsafe Utility Meter
Notice to Police and Sheriff



Plus a whole lot more




ZIELtYIsbD4
How to say no to vaccines and smart meters



The "Opt-Out" contract IS A SCAM! This video presents detailed info how to more effectively refuse and challenge harmful and illegal programs which attempt to force you to accept dangerous policies such as vaccinations and spying/transmitting utility meters. This video goes into detail to present your legal options and explain the powerful free documents at FreedomTaker.com which are designed to put the authority back in your hands.

[Matthew]

...

...

Sorry to hear this. Similar, but not quite as bad as that. In my situation I was very upset, more than I expected.

The sense of alienation is alarming :handshake:

[Bassplayer1]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'

I understand how you're feeling BassPlayer. I don't think I've ever felt so alone.
I do security-cleared contracting for large defence organizations, where save for a few individuals, taking the vaccine has become pretty much de rigueur.
It's not the taking of the vaccine I have an issue with, because it's personal medical decision, as it should be.

It's the smugness and self-satisfaction (and worse!) that usually goes with it.
Taking an untested medicine just so I can enter a venue or for the privilege of being able to sup beer in a warm country is something I will never get used to. I don't so much as raise the subject and feign indifference whenever the subject does arise.

Career-wise, many of these people are at the absolute top of their game being bright, articulate, highly-skilled systems engineers, software developers, solutions architects, mathematicians and so on. These are not fools.

But I guess if there are qualities I have (or at least I like to think I have), that they have yet to cultivate, is that I know my limitations and have an intuition that will tell me when something is not right. I don't know what this will do in the longer term, but then neither do they.

HappyUK, I agree with you completely!

I too have no issue in the freedom of choice with others taking the jab - though I worry about their health. I'm not upset because my friends made a different choice to me and got the vaccine - it was the attitude from them towards me!

And what is sad (as well as topsy turvy) is that this afternoon, the woman I mention above text me to say how pleased she was to see me and how she enjoyed my company and "let's meet up again soon!" I mean .... I'm speechless and feel sad and I also feel mean for talking about her in this thread ... but this example highlights the weird, upside down complexity of brainwashing and relationships and disconnection around facts and people we are close to etc.

I feel alone too HappyUK. I guess I'm lucky that I have 2 friends in this town who line up totally with me and a very special friend (who I keep encouraging to join Avalon) who has now moved to another part of Canada. But my husband and my family in the UK are fully vaxxed as well as the rest of my friends. I dread situations where my husband and I want to do things but he's jabbed and I'm not. I'm already turning down certain get-togethers that involve his pals because they are all fierce narrative believers who are double-vaxxed and I don't want the anxiety of being a lamb to the slaughter! But I take a deep breath and hope the house of cards will fall down soon. Interestingly, the biggest community of unvaxxed I know (apart from Avalon) is in the apartment building we live in - in fact there are already 7 people on our floor alone that will not get the jab and I know of many others throughout the building. So there's some reassurance there.

[Bassplayer1]

...

...

Sorry to hear this. Similar, but not quite as bad as that. In my situation I was very upset, more than I expected.

The sense of alienation is alarming :handshake:
Yes it is Matthew. I cried all the way home.
Thankfully, I've recovered today. But it is worrying.

[jaybee]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'


How horribly upsetting for you - I think as this brainwashing agenda really digs in and the pressure increases for many it becomes a case of ....if you can't beat them join them....

But this is a hard thing to admit especially if you began with criticism - it's humiliating and degrading to be bullied and abused by Government and Health Organizations so then to feel better they (your friends) must have gone into the Stockholm Syndrome thing - where to save face you join with and identify with the oppressor - becoming an oppressor yourself -

I'm no trained psychologist but that's what I see happening here... there may have been some chance of honest communication if your friends had said .... I caved in under the pressure....

There is a nightmare feeling about what's going on at the moment and it's hard to accept it's real and could get worse - will probably (almost certainly) get worse (before it hopefully gets better) - because so many people are now invested in the Official Narrative - they have literally put their lives on the line, taking the injection, to appease the oppressors...

I saw in your other post you said about there being people in your block where you live who haven't succumbed to the bullying and taken the jab.... that's good to have people near who understand...

x :heart:

[jaybee]

Just a little story and how maybe the odd comment here and there might make people think...

I took Mom to the dentist the other day (I can still take her out of the Care Home without any hassle at the moment)..... and the usual palaver was in operation and when we stood at the door a dental nurse took our temperatures with the gun thermometer thing and asked if we had any covid symptoms so I airily said...

"no - I've had the virus and so I've got immunity for life..."

she looked a bit surprised and asked... "did you get tested..."

so I said no I didn't need to because it was obvious - so now I've got immunity...

we went in and I kind of laughed to myself because even reminding people that you have a working immune system that you trust can be a bit of a shock to them... :)

I've said the same kind of thing on occasions before also adding - I'm confident that I'm immune to any variants as well because they are only very slightly different...

:focus:

[happyuk]

We need a new thread called 'How to Avoid Questions and Divisiveness from Opinionated Vaxxed People!'

I know so many of you reading this have had similar experiences ...

Last night I had a drink with three friends I'd not seen in over a year. I was relaxed really looking forward to it because they were like-minded folk about the whole Covid thing - well, they WERE, being the key word here! It felt like I'd walked into a trap!

I ​was shocked to discover that they had all done a complete 360 degree u-turn! All of them are double-vaxxed!!! One woman has gone from being anti-mask (even making her own 'fake mask' as a protest against the lies and disinfo), to now being vaccinated and a member of our City Council!!

She told me that the council are looking at re-introducing live music again .... but for the vaccinated only!! She told me that 'sadly' our town will be a 'two-tier society' and if I don't get vaccinated I'll 'find it difficult to participate in things'.

She's gone from one of us, to now believing in mandatory vaccines. She also feels it's not right to go to venues and allow unvaccinated folk to attend.

My other friend I've felt close to is also now in favour of mandatory vaccines! The other friend in our group said they agreed with me but got jabbed to go on holiday and to go to gigs etc.

I'm completely shocked! There was also talk about a 'fourth wave.'

I made my excuses, paid my bill and left. I cried all the way home!

Very few people believe in diet, nutrition, or the immune system these days. It's all 'follow the science' and 'civic duty' because 'we can't afford another 'lockdown.'Wow. :flower: There are definitely personality changes sometimes — or maybe often. A reminder about this thread:


Personality changes in vaxxed people (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115247-Personality-changes-in-vaxxed-people)

In his new video published yesterday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68B1gtPnGlA), Chris Martenson drew attention to this piece of pure undiluted nastiness. Go figure. :facepalm: (He wryly pointed out that re "logging off before he said something ugly", it was maybe a little too late.)

https://projectavalon.net/James_Newburrie_tweet.gif

When the lack of discernment meets a personal moral deficit we get hostile virtue signalling.

[Delight]

Is ADE beginning to be revealed?

righfqyyjUKq/

[Tintin]

Source: OCLA (https://ocla.ca/a-letter-to-the-unvaccinated/)

A Letter to the Unvaccinated
Posted on August 2, 2021
OCLA researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian academics penned an open letter to support those who have decided not to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.

The group emphasizes the voluntary nature of this medical treatment as well as the need for informed consent and individual risk-benefit assessment. They reject the pressure exerted by public health officials, the news and social media, and fellow citizens.

Control over our bodily integrity may well be the ultimate frontier of the fight to protect civil liberties.

---------------------------------

Read the letter here:


Open Letter to the Unvaccinated

You are not alone! As of 28 July 2021, 29% of Canadians have not received a COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 14% have received one shot. In the US and in the European Union, less than half the population is fully vaccinated, and even in Israel, the “world’s lab” according to Pfizer, one third of people remain completely unvaccinated. Politicians and the media have taken a uniform view, scapegoating the unvaccinated for the troubles that have ensued after eighteen months of fearmongering and lockdowns. It’s time to set the record straight.

It is entirely reasonable and legitimate to say ‘no’ to insufficiently tested vaccines for which there is no reliable science. You have a right to assert guardianship of your body and to refuse medical treatments if you see fit. You are right to say ‘no’ to a violation of your dignity, your integrity and your bodily autonomy. It is your body, and you have the right to choose. You are right to fight for your children against their mass vaccination in school.

You are right to question whether free and informed consent is at all possible under present circumstances. Long-term effects are unknown. Transgenerational effects are unknown. Vaccine-induced deregulation of natural immunity is unknown. Potential harm is unknown as the adverse event reporting is delayed, incomplete and inconsistent between jurisdictions.

You are being targeted by mainstream media, government social engineering campaigns, unjust rules and policies, collaborating employers, and the social-media mob. You are being told that you are now the problem and that the world cannot get back to normal unless you get vaccinated. You are being viciously scapegoated by propaganda and pressured by others around you. Remember; there is nothing wrong with you.

You are inaccurately accused of being a factory for new SARS-CoV-2 variants, when in fact, according to leading scientists, your natural immune system generates immunity to multiple components of the virus. This will promote your protection against a vast range of viral variants and abrogates further spread to anyone else.

You are justified in demanding independent peer-reviewed studies, not funded by multinational pharmaceutical companies. All the peer-reviewed studies of short-term safety and short-term efficacy have been funded, organized, coordinated, and supported by these for-profit corporations; and none of the study data have been made public or available to researchers who don’t work for these companies.

You are right to question the preliminary vaccine trial results. The claimed high values of relative efficacy rely on small numbers of tenuously determined “infections.” The studies were also not blind, where people giving the injections admittedly knew or could deduce whether they were injecting the experimental vaccine or the placebo. This is not acceptable scientific methodology for vaccine trials.

You are correct in your calls for a diversity of scientific opinions. Like in nature, we need a polyculture of information and its interpretations. And we don’t have that right now. Choosing not to take the vaccine is holding space for reason, transparency and accountability to emerge. You are right to ask, ‘What comes next when we give away authority over our own bodies?’

Do not be intimidated. You are showing resilience, integrity and grit. You are coming together in your communities, making plans to help one another and standing for scientific accountability and free speech, which are required for society to thrive. We are among many who stand with you.

Angela Durante, PhD
Denis Rancourt, PhD
Claus Rinner, PhD
Laurent Leduc, PhD
Donald Welsh, PhD
John Zwaagstra, PhD
Jan Vrbik, PhD
Valentina Capurri, PhD

[Gwin Ru]

If Spike Protein Facilitates Entry Of A Gain-Of-Function Coronavirus Into Cells, Then Why Are We Coerced To Submit To Spike Protein-Generating Vaccines? (https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/no_author/if-spike-protein-facilitates-entry-of-a-gain-of-function-coronavirus-into-cells-then-why-are-we-coerced-to-submit-to-spike-protein-generating-vaccines/)

By Bill Sardi
July 31, 2021

Sometimes the obvious skips right past us.

[...]

Full article: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/no_author/if-spike-protein-facilitates-entry-of-a-gain-of-function-coronavirus-into-cells-then-why-are-we-coerced-to-submit-to-spike-protein-generating-vaccines/

https://www.volcast.com/pics/button_speaker_174x40_1x1.png?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F2021%2F07%2Fno_author%2Fif-spike-protein-facilitates-entry-of-a-gain-of-function-coronavirus-into-cells-then-why-are-we-coerced-to-submit-to-spike-protein-generating-vaccines%2F (https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/no_author/if-spike-protein-facilitates-entry-of-a-gain-of-function-coronavirus-into-cells-then-why-are-we-coerced-to-submit-to-spike-protein-generating-vaccines/#)

[mojo]

Can someone explain this one? We all found out that the PCR test could not distinguish between Covid & the Flu and that a new test will be out this winter. How was it possible if that is true to distinguish between the different strains of Covid? They are freaking out over the Delta variant, just how did they know it was a variant?

Biden is supposed to speak later today about masking & the vax. Democrats are telling corporations and business people to not allow access for unvaccinated people. It is happening currently in places like the Philippines. People that will not vax will be treated differently ie discrimination of the un-vaxed. Some people could suffer harm if they are not allowed in places like grocery stores. Does anyone think it could get to that kind of situation here in the US? Can we sit blindly by and watch the un-vaxed in other Countries suffer?

[Satori]

Can someone explain this one? We all found out that the PCR test could not distinguish between Covid & the Flu and that a new test will be out this winter. How was it possible if that is true to distinguish between the different strains of Covid? The are freaking out over the Delta variant, just how did they know it was a variant?

Biden is supposed to speak later today about masking & the vax. Democrats are telling corporations and business people to not allow access for unvaccinated people. It is happening currently in places like the Philippines. People that will not vax will be treated differently ie discrimination of the un-vaxed. Some people could suffer harm if they are not allowed in places like grocery stores. Does anyone think it could get to that kind of situation here in the US? Can we sit blindly by and watch the un-vaxed in other Countries suffer?

They, those at the top of the **** pile and who set policy, know there is no variant. They also know there was and is no pandemic. They lie.

It is critical to understand: Lying is the first pillar and official policy of government and global corporations. Lie. Lie about lying and then lie about lying about lying. Control all thought to control all behavior is a principal goal at all times.

They do not care about the peoples' good health. Not one whit. They seek to destroy that which they view as an impediment in any way to the success of their evil, self-serving agendas.

[Hym]

I'll preface this post by noting my remembrances of being the son of a 30+yr. Teamster, Local 399 from L.A., heavy duty doubles. I recall the time I went to my first union picket line with my Dad, at age 7, and saw the LAPD metro squad, the "goon squad", drive up in a large, dark van and pick out one guy that they kidnapped, beat up, and left far away from the strike site, only to struggle to get back home, on foot. Sometimes avoidance is not possible, unless people find their strength in their own numbers.

Here is a petition against mandatory vaccines from the Teamsters Union, Local 399 in SoCal, a petition that includes film union workers, film technicians as we are called, in various trades:


https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/teamsters-film-technicians-against-vaccine

The petition covers all areas of concern about rights, the science behind the refusal/concerns about harm from vaccines. Very Good and succinct overview.


If you're in the biz, sign if you agree. It may be the only platform available within the industry that will get some traction.

Those commenting in the far left, industry site, deadline.com, have also expressed a firm stance on maintaining civil and constitutional liberties, while exercising their right to comment on these matters that affect the entirety of their lives.

In addition to Constance's listing of the site here to protect our rights,

https://www.freedomtaker.com,

there are also downloads available there that help those who are facing mandatory vaccinations give notice to productions and studios that they will be held liable for any harm done due to forcing them upon workers.

https://www.freedomtaker.com/downloaddocuments/RefusalOfVaccination3.doc

https://www.freedomtaker.com/downloaddocuments/EmployerCoercion.doc

https://www.freedomtaker.com/downloaddocuments/NoConsentForMedicalTesting.doc

It is a sad, sad state of affairs when union workers have to organize to protect their health and their constitutional Rights, without their representatives help, which just happens to be the charter, the job, the oaths of office of those same elected union officials, who have been employed to serve the membership.

In contrast it is a great, great time to clear the decks of all of the union corruption that makes hard days, tiring yet inspiring work schedules, even harder to endure.

______________________

I haven't seen another union petition here on Avalon, so I'm adding the entire text, which covers a lot of ground. It's a good template for other groups to unite together and stand firm in asserting their human rights:



"Teamsters / Film Technicians Against Vaccine Mandates

To; I.A.T.S.E. Local 399 and Steve Dayan,

After digesting the July 11th zoom meeting and spending time researching the issues before us, I wanted to circle back around and unpack what I’ve learned so far.

While I have no doubt that the Unions actions are well intended, it seems clear that the current guidelines are not a reflection of the majorities will and go a long way to not address the majorities concerns.

Vaccination is a medical intervention. All medical interventions come with risks. Where there is a risk, there must be a choice. That is the bedrock of medicine to this very day. The oath to “DO NO HARM”, that each physician takes is the solemn pledge to their practice and patients. Informed consent is the backbone of all medicine, established after the tribunals of WW2, where Nazi doctors injected drugs and vaccines in patients without their consent in an effort to experiment on their biology.

Mandating medical interventions and drugs on people for any reason whatsoever is strictly forbidden in both The United States constitution and International law. It is considered a human rights violation in all corners of the world.

International Law;

The Nuremberg Code, in which the number one tenant of ten reads; The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Constitutional Law;

Exparte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) which stands to this day; which reads, ”Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the constitution in case of emergency..., “ and then “Section 98 therefore, Anyone who declares the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed rights... to freely travel, peacefully assemble, EARN A LIVING, freely worship, etc.) and or attempts to enforce such suspension within the 50 independent sovereign, continental United States of America is making war against our constitutions and, therefore we the people.

HIPAA Violation;

We have the right to medical privacy. It is not moral to suggest that, for someone to earn a living wage, they should be subjected to a medical intervention they would not normally consent to.

-----------------------------

Liability? It shocks most people to learn that there is no liability for a vaccine injury in the USA. H.R. 5546 in 1986 gave blanket immunity to the pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and doctors alike, for any vaccine adverse event.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

The PREP act, reiterates the previously sited legislation that allows for experimental drugs to be used on the population with no liability whatsoever. You are on your own, should anything happen to you. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LS...

Limiting the liability begs the question, “What is an adverse reaction”. You can simply turn on your TV at this point and hear things regarding blood clots, heart attacks, anaphylaxis, even death. However, the USA does have a system to track adverse reactions. A system that the vast majority of doctors have no idea exists. It’s called VAERS. Let’s take a look at the safety, as per the;

VAERS Covid Vaccine Data

518,769 Reports through July 23, 2021

11,940 Deaths
40,991 Hospitalizations
65,067 Urgent Care
88,920 Office Visits
4,110 Anaphylaxis
3,714 Bells Palsy
These numbers seem high, however, we know that they’re extremely low. Health and Human Services paid Harvard Medical School to study how accurate the VAERS system actualy is. The result of the Harvard study was that VAERS captures less than 1% of all vaccine injury. Yes, that’s less than 1%. If the Harvard study is correct, a study our government paid to have done, it suggests that we can add 2 zeros to each of these numbers and we’re in the ball game of what is more accurate. When Harvard disclosed its findings to CDC, they cut off all communication and funding.

https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/...

quotes of importance from the study…

Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.

-----------------------------

The Meeting;

I recall a moment when an animal trainer had asked her question, about already losing work because she was not vaccinated. Your response was striking… that it was her choice and should you choose not to vaccinate, be prepared to lose some work. It is our Union leaderships job to not allow that to happen.

That is the purest definition of coercion. Producers are trying to coerce and intimidate people and it’s the job of leadership to push back with strength and unity, stating with a loud voice, “No”. A union should stand for all of its members. It should stand for choice, for freedom, for community. I grant you these are turbulent times. Times that seed much confusion. Propaganda is everywhere. Knowledge is power. Strength is in our numbers.

-----------------------------

Recently in response to the federal government mandating a COVID-19 vaccine to all federal employees there was tremendous pushback by the postal workers union.



APWU Statement on Mandatory Vaccination for Federal Employees

July 28, 2021

Various media outlets have reported that the White House is considering mandatory COVID 19 vaccinations as a condition of employment for federal employees.

Maintaining the health and safety of our members is of paramount importance. While the APWU leadership continues to encourage postal workers to voluntarily get vaccinated, it is not the role of the federal government to mandate vaccinations for the employees we represent.

Issues related to the vaccinations and testing for COVID-19 in the workplace must be negotiated with the APWU. At this time the APWU opposes the mandating of COVID-19 vaccinations in relation to U.S. Postal Workers.

“Maintaining the health and safety of our members is of paramount importance,”

The APWU has said NO and so can we!

-----------------------------

There are risks here. We, as a collective, should know the risks. Dr. Simone Gold MD, JD, FABEM, has offered to brief union members on the science and the risk ratios of both Sars-COV2 infection, COVID-19 disease and all three COVID-19 vaccines. She has been briefing unions, most recently the airline pilots union. I’m confident that would be a popular zoom call to attend.

In conclusion, I would like to remind our leadership to lead. The teamsters have a proud history of standing up for working men and woman. In years past, the Teamsters have led the fight against discrimination, coercion and exclusion. Our very history demands we stand up now for the rights of our members medical autotomy. “My body, my choice” was a mantra echoed throughout our society at a time when people sought to instill their values and fear onto others. The Teamsters stood for freedom then. They should stand for Freedom now.

The COVID-19 vaccines are readily available. They are not being withheld from anyone for any reason. If we are to believe the narrative that they are effective, the vaccinated should have nothing to fear from those that either philosophically, religiously or medically choose to opt out of this or any other medical intervention.

I invite all Teamsters to stand for freedom of choice and stand against mandating this or any drug on its membership as a condition to work. It is fear based, un-American, but most of all...it is wrong.

In consideration of the above information, we, the undersigned, declare that we are against mandates of a COVID-19 vaccine, as a requirement for working in the craft we have chosen. We demand that the leadership of Local 399 represent the interests of all our working brothers and sisters, regardless of their individual choice in the matter. "

[Ankle Biter]

Pfizer CEO's expected visit to Israel has been canceled after it was found that he hasn't yet received the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine
https://www.ibtimes.sg/pfizer-ceos-israel-visit-postponed-due-covid-19-vaccination-related-concerns-56019


Doesn't want to 'cut in line'.
Yeah sure pal.

The Boss of the company making the stuff doesn't even want it.

[Hym]

When a worker has to assert their right to control their own personal, bodily integrity, and in this case the right to be free from a mandated medical procedure, in order to stay healthy and avoid an experimental, genetic attack upon their entire circulatory system, an obvious clear and present danger to their lives.....
there usually are several supervisors getting paid to impose the mandates.

Even more sinister, and likely criminal, is the fact that union members who speak up and present even one question about the entire agenda that threatens their health, seem to be targeted by members of the covid crews, the PPE gang. One such friend who expressed his commitment to his health, by telling others he'd never take a shot, had members of that covid crew single him out, and when he was given his first test, directed to a specific tester who gave him his 'test', he had a violent reaction that lasted for 45 minutes. Weeks later he is still recovering from whatever they did to him.

Whether its about not being able to get enough oxygen while wearing a mask all day, questioning the science behind getting a shot, or complaining about the ingredients in the nasal swabs, the carcinogenic preservatives or the nano-fibers.......

Any such hint at dissent seems to be noted by the covid creeps. Use your imagination and you'll likely discern what those 'safety' crew members have been directed to do to single out and maybe harm those who stand up to preserve their health. The covid crews are their fellow crew members, their own union partners, their own 'brothers and sisters in solidarity'. What a crock. The good thing is, we all know that crocks are there waiting to be cracked.

It isn't the legality or lack thereof that concerns me here. It is the abject lack of morality and honesty of those who choose to betray the trust of their fellow workers. When we speak of avoiding dangerous and unproven medical procedures, we must also consider the poison of dishonesty that other fellow workers inject into the work place. Until that is weeded out and exposed, federal and union chartered laws upheld, this attack on the health of all workers will not be stopped.



Last year, when this was all rolling out, I predicted that there would be 'financial incentives' for anyone who would fill in the newly created positions that would be dealing with the very unhealthy mandates we already saw coming from the film unions collusion with the producer's guild. I was right, as were others who knew of the working nature of those in film, especially in this state.

In the case of film, the groundwork for creating new positions that were SUPPOSED to protect the human rights of those crew and acting members within a production, began with training 'intimacy' specialists who were there to prevent the personal abuses experienced by actors and actresses in the past, this all a direct result of the local union removing an abusive business agent/rep and the nationwide movement to protect women everywhere, especially in the film industry. The fact that the union did not extrapolate from that basic training, adapt to the conditions presented last year and truly coordinate protection for it's crew members from unhealthy mandates was a stark contrast to its most recent actions.

I really wouldn't give a spit if I hadn't met some great friends in the union during my short 7 years as a member, of yet another union that promised much and yet had a consistent penchant for breeding the worst in others. That special, morally bankrupt breed of members are all that stands in the way of members from asserting their rights to refuse unhealthy mandates.

In order for a union to ward off such a deeply corrupt and insidious attack from its own backstabbing elected officials it has to do what it should do best....communicate, coordinate and act...on its own behalf, often without the interference of those same elected officials. The proof of the betrayal of its elected officials is the fact that not one elected officer is raising their voice in dissent of unhealthy demands, nor are they organizing members to present their demands to productions for healthy and ethical working conditions.

In this case the film union, and likely other unions, have 'covid coordinators'. I cannot see how those and their underlings in this position would not be rewarded with highly questionable and unethical incentives for pushing 'vaccines'. I have heard many working crew members already detail the coercive and decidedly dishonest talking points that those on the vax crews, the covid crews, especially their coordinators, have been repeating on ALL of the productions now active.

Our talk here is about avoiding the injection, but there have already been many instances,..... on every production where mask use has caused harm, where the possibility of avoiding harm due to a continual lack of oxygen, along with constantly inhaling toxin-laden exhaled air, seemed to be impossible. How many productions took the obvious into account and limited the use of masks by citing the decades long guidelines given by OSHA, guidelines solidly backed up by endless citations, studies and user guided experiences?

Which construction coordinator, scenic, lead, general foreman, foreman or even gang boss avoided getting their crews sick, by having a pair, whether it was testes or ovaries? Tho I have friends in those positions of being supervisors, I still don't give them any slack for not organizing together and sticking up for their crews.

In contrast, I have applauded my friends who have overridden the 'cv guidelines' and given their crews breaks to take off the masks and breathe, while still keeping large physical distances between each other, or foremen/ gang bosses who demanded that a studio open up their large doors during times of oppressive heat to improve air circulation, and even a studio manager turning on the air conditioning to give a crew a well deserved, long dose of comfortably breathable air. That's their f'n jobs!

Throughout the history of organized labor there have been a few times where crews stood together and have halted productions in order to maintain their right to working in a safe environment. The most important times to do so were since the beginning of this imposed challenge. At this crucial moment, in this decisive time of maintaining or losing basic human and constitutional rights, each crew must remember its right to organize and stand up. It is a long history that has many successes, standing together as a group of skilled crafts folks. All of those hard fought and won gains are battles that are alive right now, and all are meant to give strength to avoid the loss of all that workers have fought to attain.

Those battles live when any one crew stands up. In this case, at this time, when each production is in dire need of competent and willing crews to complete their tasks, their movies, their series, there is no better time than the present for demanding that productions follow common sense, well established health and safety guidelines......guidelines that do not remove the rights to protecting their bodily integrity, ones that do not include any weaknesses from OSHA officials who have recently bent over to keep their jobs, having just rescinded the decades of the very same rules and regulations that have protected millions of workers, nationwide.

The ironic thing is that in one of the recent, day long OSHA 10 industry safety classes I took, all three of the instructors talked about the necessity of standing up for the safety of their crews. All three said that if you are doing your job as a safety coordinator you'll be fired, and surely more than once, for refusing to go along with one of the many unsafe production demands crews are likely to encounter from an uncaring and callous production management team.

One of the standout examples in the recent past was a director's very unsafe demand, over the objections of union members, that caused the death of a worker, Sara. I have a sticker on one of my work boxes that says "Remember Sara". You can be assured that some film members quit after that tragedy. You can also count on the fact that those on that crew have been, for the most part, permanently affected enough to speak up more often when their health has been threatened. I wonder what's up with them now that everyones life is being affected by the unhealthy demands of productions on everyones right to even breathing full breaths of air, and now attempting to impose dangerous pre-conditions for just showing up to work.....

In fact, it is in the film union's charter and in the Standard Agreements clauses with all productions that any unsafe work condition can be stopped by any member at any time, with the union protection of no retribution for calling attention to the danger. Where and when has that right been asserted during this entire dangerous attack on the health of every mask wearing, nasal swab preservative ingesting, vaccine-mandate confronted union member?

For being a union, it hasn't been very united during this challenge. However, there are countless numbers of living, breathing, brothers and sisters more than empowered enough to change the working conditions they are now unnecessarily enduring.

Some things, like standing together, even with some few who we don't get along with, cannot be avoided.....And that's the good thing about this challenge.

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/study-finds-most-highly-educated-americans-are-also-most-vaccine-hesitant



Study Finds The Most Highly-Educated Americans Are Also The Most Vaccine-Hesitant
Tyler Durden's Photo
BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, AUG 11, 2021 - 02:31 PM
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A new report by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh has found that the most highly educated Americans are also the most vaccine hesitant.

The researchers canvassed no fewer than 5 million Americans who responded to surveys on whether they were “probably” or “definitely not planning on getting a COVID vaccine.

The results will shock many.

“More surprising is the breakdown in vaccine hesitancy by level of education,” reports UnHerd.

“It finds that the association between hesitancy and education level follows a U-shaped curve with the highest hesitancy among those least and most educated. People with a master’s degree had the least hesitancy, and the highest hesitancy was among those holding a PhD.”

In addition, while the lowest educated saw the largest drop in vaccine hesitancy for the first five months of 2021, those with PhD’s were the most likely to not change their minds.

The study also reveals that the most common concern for those who are hesitant to take the vaccine is potential side-effects, with a lack of trust in government close behind in second.

The results of the investigation completely debunk the notion, amplified by media narratives, that only “dumb” people are vaccine hesitant.

It also demolishes NYT White House correspondent Annie Karni’s characterization of elitists who attended Obama’s 60th birthday party by as “sophisticated, vaccinated.”

How many of them haven’t taken the vaccine?

< charts at link >

[ExomatrixTV]

1412795172564439042


source (https://twitter.com/PatriarchPrimus/status/1412795172564439042)




Form for Employees (https://pandemic.solari.com/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections/) Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections

IMPORTANT: DOWNLOAD COVID VACCINE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION DOCUMENTS HERE:

https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Screen-Shot-2021-07-29-at-10.06.49-PM.png
I have been receiving dozens of direct messages on Gab over the past week with people from around the country sharing the horrors from inside the United States Military and their places of employment regarding “mandatory” non-FDA approved experimental Covid vaccinations.



Many people are being forced to choose between feeding their families and getting injected with a potentially deadly experimental substance.



This is a fundamental violation of not only human rights, but the religious rights that we are guaranteed in the United States of America.



At the bottom of this post are Word docs and PDF files constructing what the creator of the documents calls an “air tight religious exemption request” for the COVID vaccine if it is mandatory for you at work, school, or in the military. You can download these and customize them to your individual scenario.


The Full Document is everything necessary for a US Army Soldier to submit a religious exemption request to his immediate commander, with only certain portions needing to be edited to include your name, unit, and details.


The “Religious + Practical Side Supporting Documents” contains all of the details giving both the religious reasons for why Christians cannot receive the Vaccine, and the practical reasons for why it isn’t actually necessary to receive the Vaccine.



The Religious and Practical Side Supporting Documents are also separated in case you specifically need either one without the other.
We are human beings made in the image of God. We have God-given human rights and should not be forced to choose between feeding our families and putting something that is potentially deadly into our bodies. As a reminder Gab.com is the only social network on the internet that allows criticism and discussion about the experimental non-FDA approved Covid vaccine. (https://news.gab.com/2021/04/22/gab-welcomes-pushback-against-experimental-vaccines/)
DOWNLOAD THE WORD DOCUMENTS HERE

Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military- (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military-.doc)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military-.doc)
Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document.doc)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document.doc)
Vaccine-Exemption-Orthodox Christian Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents.doc)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents.doc)
Vaccine-Exemption-Orthodox Christian Religious-Side-Supporting-Document (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Side-Supporting-Document.doc)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Side-Supporting-Document.doc)
Catholic-Vaccine-exemption_Template (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Catholic-exemption_Template.docx)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Catholic-exemption_Template.docx)
DOWNLOAD THE PDF VERSION HERE

Form-for-Employees-Whose-Employers-Are-Requiring-Covid-19-Injections-under-Emergency-Use-Authorization (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Form-for-Employees-Whose-Employers-Are-Requiring-Covid-19-Injections-under-Emergency-Use-Authorization.pdf)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Form-for-Employees-Whose-Employers-Are-Requiring-Covid-19-Injections-under-Emergency-Use-Authorization.pdf)
Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military-PDF (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military-PDF.pdf)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Full-Military-PDF.pdf)
Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF.pdf)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Practical-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF.pdf)
Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents-PDF (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents-PDF.pdf)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Practical-Supporting-Documents-PDF.pdf)
Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF.pdf)Download (https://news.gab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccine-Exemption-Religious-Side-Supporting-Document-PDF.pdf)
For US Air Force service members

While the Air Force tailors religious requests to each individual, the following can be used to start the process should the Air Force make this Covid shot mandatory. Folks can drop this text into their unit letterhead, fill in their name, and submit to their commanders.
MEMORANDUM FOR Immediate Commander

SUBJECT: Request for Religious Accommodation – Rank Name

01. I request a religious accommodation to not be required to receive a vaccination for COVID-19 in accordance with policies and procedures contained in DoDI 1300.17 (Accommodation of Religious Practices Within the Military Services), 22 Feb 2014; AFI 48-110 (Immunizations And Chemoprophylaxis For The Prevention of Infectious Diseases), 6 Oct 2013; and AFPD 52-2 (Accommodation of Religious Practices in the Air Force), 27 Jul 2020.

02. It is well-documented that all COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the United States utilized fetal cell lines in their development (PER.C6 by Johnson & Johnson) or testing (HEK 293 by Pfzier and Moderna) that are descended from fetal tissue taken from elective abortions. The University of Nebraska Medical Center has documented these facts here: https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/you-asked-we-answered-do-the-covid-19-vaccines-contain-aborted-fetal-cells.

03. I am not opposed to vaccines in principle; however, it is my sincerely-held religious belief that abortion is immoral and that these vaccines are not morally justifiable, especially considering the extremely low mortality rate and rare instances of permanent complications from COVID-19 infections among those of military age.

04. While this request is being considered by the Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, personnel, and Services, I understand that I have a temporary exemption from compliance IAW AFPD 52-2, paragraph 1.4. I also understand that permanent exemptions for religious reasons are not granted and that the MAJCOM commander is the designated approval and revocation authority for temporary immunization exemptions IAW AFI 48-110, paragraph 2-6.

05. I look forward to working with you, our chaplains, our medical providers, and our judge advocates to consider this request. If you have any questions, please reach me at (XXX) XXX-XXXX or by email at xxxxxxxxxxx.

By Andrew Torba (https://news.gab.com/author/andrew/)


source (https://news.gab.com/2021/07/29/important-download-covid-vaccine-religious-exemption-documents-here/)

[Matthew]

Alberta chief medical officer announces COVID vaccine clinics for schools
By Rebel News | August 13, 2021

https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_chief_medical_officer_announces_covid_vaccine_clinics_for_schools

Alberta's Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw announced today at a press conference that, with the new school year looming, Alberta Health Services would be making COVID-19 vaccines available to both students and teachers in schools this coming year.

With the new school year a little more than three weeks away, and around 50 per cent of children aged 12–17 fully vaccinated, Hinshaw said that offering vaccines through schools would increase accessibility to those who were eligible.

...

[andyangel1205]

It's getting nutty out here - especially in California. Any good tips on getting a "vaccine passport?" wink wink
Also - what's the word in Canada? It is true that you can't even fly across the country without proof of the shot?

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/indias-ivermectin-blackout/article_e3db8f46-f942-11eb-9eea-77d5e2519364.html



India's Ivermectin Blackout

Ivermectin Wins in India

News of India's defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one's face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.

Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/wikipedia-and-a-pint-of-gin/article_22ffa0d8-dde9-11eb-be75-d7b0b1f2ff67.html

Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill. Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AIvermectin

One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the "talk" pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the "senior" editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.

The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.

There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, "But why is there no mention of that in the news?"

Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/07/20/1018438334/indias-pandemic-death-toll-estimated-at-about-4-million-10-times-the-official-co

Perhaps NPR is trying so hard because NPR is essentially a government mouthpiece. The US government is “all-in” with vaccines with the enthusiasm of a 17th century Catholic Church “all-in” with a Geocentric Model of the Universe disputing Galileo. Claiming that India’s numbers are inaccurate might distract from the overwhelming success of Ivermectin.

But in the end, the truth matters. It mattered in 1616, and it matters in 2021.

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/thedesertreview.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/3/19/319aa24e-f95c-11eb-9c83-27c7330f1f77/6111a3f98b7fb.image.jpg?resize=400%2C613

The graphs and data from the Johns Hopkins University CSSE database do not lie. On the contrary, they provide a compelling trail of truth that no one can dispute, not even the NIH, CDC, FDA, and WHO.

Just as Galileo proved with his telescope that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe in 1616; today, the data from India shows that Ivermectin is effective, much more so than the vaccines. It not only prevents death, but it also prevents COVID infections, and it also is effective against the Delta Variant.

In 1616, you could not make up the telescopic images of Jupiter and its orbiting moons, nor could you falsify the crescent-shaped images of Venus and Mercury. These proved that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe – a truth the Catholic Church could not allow.

Likewise, the massive drop in cases and deaths in India to almost nothing after the addition of Ivermectin proved the drug's effectiveness. This is a truth that the NIH, CDC, and FDA cannot allow because it would endanger the vaccine policy.

Never mind that Ivermectin would save more lives with much less risk, much less cost, and it would end the pandemic quickly.

Let us look at the burgundy-colored graph of Uttar Pradesh. First, allow me to thank Juan Chamie, a highly-respected Cambridge-based data analyst, who created this graph from the JHU CSSE data. Uttar Pradesh is a state in India that contains 241 million people. The United States’ population is 331 million people. Therefore, Uttar Pradesh can be compared to the United States, with 2/3 of our population size.

This data shows how Ivermectin knocked their COVID-19 cases and deaths - which we know were Delta Variant - down to almost zero within weeks. A population comparable to the US went from about 35,000 cases and 350 deaths per day to nearly ZERO within weeks of adding Ivermectin to their protocol.

By comparison, the United States is the lower graph. On August 5, here in the good ol’ USA, blessed with the glorious vaccines, we have 127,108 new cases per day and 574 new deaths.

Let us look at the August 5 numbers from Uttar Pradesh with 2/3 of our population. Uttar Pradesh, using Ivermectin, had a total of 26 new cases and exactly THREE deaths. The US without Ivermectin has precisely 4889 times as many daily cases and 191 times as many deaths as Uttar Pradesh with Ivermectin.

It is not even close. Countries do orders of magnitude better WITH Ivermectin. It might be comparable to the difference in travel between using an automobile versus a horse and buggy.

Uttar Pradesh on Ivermectin: Population 240 Million [4.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 26

COVID Daily Deaths: 3

The United States off Ivermectin: Population 331 Million [50.5% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 127,108

COVID Daily Deaths: 574

Let us look at other Ivermectin using areas of India with numbers from August 5, 2021, compiled by the JHU CSSE:

Delhi on Ivermectin: Population 31 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 61

COVID Daily Deaths: 2

Uttarakhand on Ivermectin: Population 11.4 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 24

COVID Daily Deaths: 0

Now let us look at an area of India that rejected Ivermectin.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/tn-drops-ivermectin-as-covid-19-drug/article34561235.ece

Tamil Nadu announced they would reject Ivermectin and instead follow the dubious USA-style guidance of using Remdesivir. Knowing this, you might expect their numbers to be closer to the US, with more cases and more deaths. You would be correct. Tamil Nadu went on to lead India in COVID-19 cases.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/tamil-nadu-leads-india-in-new-infections-denies-citizens-ivermectin/article_32634012-ba66-11eb-9211-ab378d521f9a.html

Tamil Nadu continues to suffer for its choice to reject Ivermectin. As a result, the Delta variant continues to ravage their citizens while it was virtually wiped out in the Ivermectin-using states. Likewise, in the United States, without Ivermectin, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated continue to spread the Delta variant like wildfire.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/05/health/us-coronavirus-thursday/index.html

Tamil Nadu off Ivermectin: Population 78.8 Million [6.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 1,997

COVID Daily Deaths: 33

Like the JHU CSSE data, Galileo's telescope did not lie either, and the truth can usually be found in plain sight. Ivermectin works, and it works exceedingly well. Harvard-trained virologist Dr. George Fareed and his associate, Dr. Brian Tyson of California's Imperial Valley, have saved 99.9% of their patients with a COVID Cocktail that includes Ivermectin. They have released versions of their new book published in the Desert Review that everyone should read.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/doctors-story-of-light-and-life-the-covid-19-darkness-overcome-part-i/article_5ae16f0c-f614-11eb-8351-cf0d67e94c25.html

I could talk about how every one of my patients who used Ivermectin recovered rapidly, about my most recent case who felt 90% better within 48 hours of adding the drug, but I won't. I could write about how Wikipedia censors more than Pravda, about how you should always read the "talk" section of EVERY Wikipedia article to go behind the scenes and understand what the editors DO NOT want you to read, but I will refrain.

I could write about VAERS and how it is so much easier to navigate by following Open VAERS or how Wikipedia has unfairly portrayed Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world's sharpest and most credible doctors. But I will hold back.

https://www.openvaers.com/

I could also discuss our current cancer treatment system's dangers and how chemotherapy and radiation stimulate cancer stem cells and cancer recurrence. About how this information has been suppressed and how the addition of repurposed drug cocktails can help prevent this, but I digress.

https://www.amazon.com/Surviving-Cancer-COVID-19-Disease-Repurposed/dp/0998055425

I could recite the history of early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 with repurposed drugs, including Ivermectin, with all the specifics, and EXACTLY WHY this lifesaving information has been censored, but instead, I will leave researching these topics to each of you readers as individuals.

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909

Because you already know what will happen if you simply sit back and swallow what the media are feeding you. You MUST question what the government tells you, and always DO YOUR OWN research.

Following the 1616 Inquisition of Galileo, the Pope banned all books and letters that argued the sun was the center of the Universe instead of the Earth. Similarly, today, the FDA and WHO have banned any use of Ivermectin for COVID outside of a clinical trial.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-advises-that-ivermectin-only-be-used-to-treat-covid-19-within-clinical-trials

YouTube and Wikipedia both consider Ivermectin for COVID as heresy.

“YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19… Treatment misinformation: claims that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19.”

Wikipedia defines heresy as: “any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs or customs, in particular the accepted beliefs of a church or religious organization. The term is usually used in reference to violations of important religious teachings, but is also used of views strongly opposed to any generally accepted ideas. A heretic is a proponent of heresy.”

Heresy is disagreeing with the government, or their health authority, even if they are all wrong and even if their policies harm people. Today we no longer call it heresy; it is labeled as misinformation.

Galileo was found guilty of heresy and sentenced on June 22, 1633, to formal imprisonment, although this was commuted to house arrest, under which he remained for the rest of his life.

On August 7, 2021 Medpage Today published a new quiz, “Can COVID Misinformation Cost You Your Medical License?”

[Matthew]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E86GZYvWQAMVJIi?format=jpg&name=900x900

[mountain_jim]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/082/366/702/original/0ca96b09f302291e.png

[Matthew]

Apparently schools will begin VACCINATING ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN AGED 12 - 15 years old

https://twitter.com/jetixfreddy/status/1430872645449535492

[Delight]

Whole post from reddit for the record


Acceptable Reasons for Vaccine Hesitance w/ 50 Published Medical Journal Sources [all credit to covinfo1999]
[repost without crosspost to avoid NNN quarantine for non-reddit users. absolutely fantastic information worth scouring through to better understand our current crisis. all credit to /u/covinfo1999 and please post here additionally from now on as I'm sure this sub will appreciate your hard work!]

Covinfo Data Dump:-

The current Covid19 vaccines have several problems. I would say that there are 9 main areas of interest:

the spike protein appears to be cytotoxic.

the emergence of immune escape variants.

the potential for antibody dependent enhancement.

the potential for autoimmune disorders.

the narrow design focus of the vaccines.

the fact that alternative treatments are available to both prevent and treat covid.

they are trying to jab everyone, even people who have recovered from covid and do not need the jab.

there are a growing number of severe reactions to the vaccines but this fact gets very little coverage in the press and sometimes it even gets outright censorship.

the potential for long term unknown side effects and the potential impact of this on national security.

I will present a brief overview of each issue and then provide scientific data below for support (except for 9. which is more a discussion based on a logical assessment of future risk).

1. The spike protein of the virus, that is also being utilized in the vaccines, is damaging to our cells through 3 mechanisms. The first is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the ACE2 to send signals to the mitochondria within the cell which destroys the mitochondria, eventually killing the cell. The second is that when the spike protein binds to our ACE2 receptors it causes the ACE2 to send signals to other cells which increases the amount of pro-inflammatory agents in the blood. This inflammation damages the tissues. The third way is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 of the platelets in our blood, it causes them to clot. Now, the vaccine manufacturers did take steps to make the spike protein more safe. The spike protein has two parts an S1 subunit and an S2 subunit. The S1 is the part that connects to the ACE2, and the S2 is the part that opens up like a knife stabbing the membrane and facilitates fusion between the membrane of the cell and the envelope of the virus. With the vaccines, they modified the S2 subnit so that it could not open up and jab into the cell membranes if it connects with any ACE2 receptors. They thought this would make the spike protein safe, but this assumption is false and if they had taken the time to do more research before rushing to production they would have found that out. It may seem like the jabby bit is what damages the cells, but actually the major damage is caused by the S1 connecting to the ACE2 receptor. Just the S1, by itself without the S2, causes the ACE2 receptor to start the cell signaling processes that cause the mitochondrial damage, the pro-inflammatory response, and the blood clots.

Studies on the spike protein:-

How the virus uses the spike protein to enter human cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub

Japanese article on how the Pfizer vax is associated with brain hemorrhaging (lending credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood brain barrier in some people): https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7

Article on how AstraZeneca is associated with blood clots in the brain (lending more credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood brain barrier in some people): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of our platelets to cause bloodclots: https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7

Article explaining that blood clots from the spike protein interacting with our platelets are associated with both COVID-19 infection and vaccination: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648

Article explains that just the S1 subunit of the spike protein can cause platelets to clot: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1

Article with evidence that spike proteins do end up circulating in the blood, when they're not supposed to, they're supposed to be anchored on the cell membranes: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075

More evidence that spike proteins do not stay on the cell membranes but end up circulating in the blood. This study aims to explain the blood clots caused by the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovector vaccines, they claim that the DNA isn't properly spliced and the spike proteins end up in the blood causing thrombosis when the spikes attach to the ACE2 receptors of the endothelial cells: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1

Article on how the spike protein can cause neurodegeneration: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub

Journal article with evidence that the spike protein by itself can damage cells by binding to ACE2, causing the cells mitochondria to lose their shape and break apart: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902

Article on how the spike protein in vaccines can cause cell damage via cell signaling: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/

Article that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the release of soluble IL-6R which acts as a extracellular signal which causes inflammation (see the first paper for evidence that the spike causes the release of IL-6R and see the second paper for an explanation of how soluble IL-6R causes pro-inflamatory extracellular signaling: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/ And https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/

Another article that Spike protein from covid or the vaccine causes inflammation through cell signaling, this time there is evidence that the spike protein causes senescence (premature aging) signals in the cell which attracts leukocytes that cause inflammation of the cell: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21

Spike protein by itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory response: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z

Biodistribution data:-

Pfizer animal testing document that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through a FOI request to the Japanese government which shows the biodistribution of the lipid-nano particles throughout the bodies and organs of the test subjects. This is evidence that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in the injecton site, but instead travel all throughout the body (go to pg 16/23 for the charts showing biodistribution over the course of 48hrs): https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf

Addendum to the above link. This blog post provides easy to understand information (with pictures) on the make-up of the lipid nanoparticles used in the Covid19 vaccines. It shows that the pharmaceutical companies could have designed them to have targeting ligands on the outside, so that the nanoparticles would only transfect the muscle cells. But instead the vax was designed with PEG polymers on the outside, so that the immune system will not be able to pick them up and put them in the trash. The PEG is what Byram Bridle says is the reason the vaccine travels throughout the body and since it does not have targeting ligands, it can transfect any type of cell: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines

2. Vaccine enhanced immune escape occurs when a poorly designed or weak vaccine helps create new variants. This happens in the exact same way as antibiotic resistance and regular old evolution. In the case of evolution, if you want to make an organism stronger, you put it under evolutionarily unfavorable conditions. This way you kill all the weak examples of the organism and just leave the strong ones. If you want to create heat resistant bacteria, put a petri dish full of the bacteria under moderately high heat that kills 99% of the bacteria. Save the 1% that were able to survive the heat, allow them to grow, and repeat the process over and over again while turning up the heat just a little each time. Do this until you have a population of bacteria that are all extremely heat resistant. The same process occurs with antibiotic resistance. When you only take half your meds, you kill 99% of the bacteria and you leave only the 1% that were slightly more resistant to the drugs and now they flourish. Before they were a small part of the population but you changed the conditions of their environment so that they have the advantage. You've killed all the normal bacteria that the mutant variants had to compete with so that now the antibiotic resistant bacteria are the alpha strain that have unlimited resources and so surge in population to take over your body. Well, the same thing happens with viruses and vaccines.

If you produce a vaccine that elicits a weak immune response, you are creating an unfavorable environment for the virus. This will kill the weak 99%, and leave those 1% of mutant virus particles that are not as hindered by the antibodies produced by the vaccine. Whereas before these mutants were only a tiny part of the population and would have been unlikely to transmit on to the next person. Now these mutant virus particles surge in number because they no longer have to compete with the other virus particles and your bodies defenses do not work. They are now highly likely to transmit on to the next person, whereas before they would not have been able to leave the host in which the mutation occured. In terms of creating variants, the current covid vaccines are very bad for three reasons. First, some vaccine manufacturers require two shots and now also boosters because the first shot produces a very weak immune response. Second, the vaccines are very leaky. Even after you have gotten a full immune response from both shots, you can still get and transmit the virus onto others. Well, which virus particles are likely to get passed on by a fully vaccinated person? Clearly they will be those virus particles that have the ability to multiply quickly while avoiding the antibodies produced by the vaccines. This will create very virulent and antibody resistant variants. Watch for these variants in the news as time goes on, we're already seeing things like Delta, Lambda, Eplsion, etc.

As we implement boosters, they will start to come at faster and faster rates, and over time data scientists will start to see timed correlations between the implementation of mass boosters and the emergence of new strains. Third, the vaccines do seem to help reduce the severity of the disease when people are infected (although this may change as new variants emerge). Why would this be a concern? Well, because of the leakiness of the vaccines we just spoke about. If you have very low symptoms but you can still get and transmit the virus, then you won't even realize that you're sick and you'll be spreading the virus to even more people as an asymptomatic carrier. So, these vaccines will only increase transmission by creating more and more asymptomatic carriers (although this may not be a bad thing, if everyone in the world gets the virus and everyone is asymptomatic, then there's really no need to care about covid anymore. But this is an unrealistic idealization that is unlikely to occur, some people will still get sick and die or suffer long haul covid). One additional point to address here is the claim that the unvaccinated are causing the emergence of new vaccine resistant variants. Let me be clear, the unvaccinated absolutely have the ability to facilitate the creation of new variants. However, it would require a statistically enormous number of people to get the virus before they could produce a new variant by chance. This is because a mutant virus particle will only make up a small portion of the virus population inside a person's body.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this particular particle will be able to spread to a new person. Whereas, in the vaccinated, their weak immune response specifically selects for the mutant variants. It is highly likely that if a vaccinated person passes on the virus to another person, the particles they pass on will be those that have the ability to escape from the immune response elicited by the vaccines. An analogy would be if you did an experiment with 500 room temperature petri dishes filled with bacteria and 500 heated petri dishes with bacteria, then found a heat resistant variant but didn't know which dish it came from. It would be absurd to think that the heat resistant strain of bacteria came from the room temperature petri dishes. It would possible, sure, but completely improbable that the heat resistant strain had suddenly appeared in a room temp petri dish. There would be no reason for it to become a dominant strain in that environment. Logically, statistically, and evolutionarily, it must have come from the heated petri dishes. This is a very basic and obvious conclusion, but the media and government bureaucrats in lab coats are trying to tell you that the absurd thing is true. They're trying to say that the unvaccinated (the room temperature petri dishes) are where the vaccine resistant strains are coming from.

Vaccine Enhanced Immune Escape:-

Evidence of cov2 immune escape: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abi7994

Article from 2015 that explains how imperfect vaccination (like the Pfizer and moderna that require at least two shots to be effective) can create immune escape variants: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

Article from 2021 explains that unless vaccination is done quickly, there will be a high probability of escape mutants: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3

3. There is a potential for ADE, antibody dependent enhancement. This is when the virus mutates so that the antibodies no longer neutralize the virus but the antibodies still try to attach to it. This can actually help the virus get into your immune cells because when the virus is covered with antibodies it will draw macrophages to the virus that will try to eat it. However, when your macrophages come to eat the virus particle that they think has been neutralized, the virus gets inside them and starts replicating because the antibodies actually didn't neutralize the virus. Your own antibodies act like a kind of Trojan Horse. Another way that ADE can happen is your own antibodies connect to the receptors of your cells and actually help the virus get in directly. This was a huge problem with the Dengue vaccine and we need to do a lot of testing to make sure this isn't a possibility. Clearly with these rushed vaccines we haven't eliminated this possibility and with the virus mutating, ADE may pop up with a later variant. We must stay vigilant and keep an eye out for this signal. It will manifest as people with high antibody levels being more likely to get sick and die.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement:-

Journal article from 2005 shows evidence that sars-cov1 vaccine, that also focused on the spike protein, caused ADE when subjects were challenged with different strain: https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1

Article explaining how ADE works in Sar-cov1: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Article explaining the potential for ADE in Covid19: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Another article that speculates on the potential for ADE in Covid19: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/

Article from 2021 explains that there is evidence that covid19 is able to kill macrophages by using antibody dependent mechanisms: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.22.432407v1

4. There is a potential for an autoimmune response from the vaccines. The vaccines that were developed for Sars-Cov-1 used the spike protein, just like the vaccines for Sars-Cov-2. Unfortunately, those vaccines caused the animals to develop serious autoimmune disorders and they ended up causing severe organ damage. There is a question about whether these new vaccines, which also focus on the spike protein, will also cause autoimmune disorders. The problem is that autoimmune disorders take time to develop and to show up. It may also take a long time before doctors and scientists can link the sudden rise in autoimmune disorders with these vaccines. Usually, in a vaccine trial you closely monitor your trial group for years and years. This allows you to identify the signals. With the current program of injecting millions of people, there will be no clear way to link causation to the vaccines and an increase in autoimmune disorders may just fly under the radar. We may not know for a very long time or never. Another concern is that because of the way the mRNA vaccines work, they cause your own cells to present as foreign entities. Your immune system comes over and starts killing your own cells. This has never been done before in human history. We have no idea if there will be long term consequences for this and whether this will lead to autoimmune disorders.

Research results of past vaccines for sars-cov1 that used the spike protein:-

Journal article from 2004 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study

Journal article from 2005 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15755610/

Journal article from 2012 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421

Journal article from 2020 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov vaccine (can't figure out if they're talking about cov1 or 2): https://jvi.asm.org/content/78/22/12672.abstract

Journal article from 2020 explains why immune disorders happen with covid vax, because human and Covid19 proteins are similar: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186

5. The mRNA vaccines are narrowly focused on just the spike protein when they could have been designed to target more proteins. The Covid19 coronavirus has 4 main proteins. There are 3 on its outside and 1 on the inside. The S-protein, the M-protein, and the E-protein, are on the outside, while the N-protein is on the inside. When you get a natural infection your body will likely produce antibodies for all or most of these proteins (depending on the function of your own unique immune system). We knew from studying Sars-Cov-1 that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein are both neutralizing. In fact, they used exactly that knowledge when they designed the current vaccines. So, they could have tried to make vaccines that utilize the M-protein to avoid the potential for autoimmune disorders discussed above. But they didn't, they instead focused only on the S-protein. They could have designed the vaccines so that they present both the S-protein and the M-protein. This would have made the vaccines much more effective and less leaky since any mutated virus particles would have to have mutated both the S-protein and the M-protein to avoid the antibodies. Whereas, the current vaccines are narrowly focused on just the S-protein, meaning that the virus only has to mutate the one protein. It is exponentially harder for an organism to mutate two beneficial traits vs just mutating one beneficial trait. So, these vaccines are worse than they could have been.

Vaccine efficacy:-

Article explains how vaccine manufacturers have used relative risk reduction to determine that vaccine efficacy is ~90+%, however they should have used absolute risk reduction which would tell us that the vaccines will only reduce total covid cases by ~1%: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

Addendum to the above information. This video from 2013 explains the difference between relative and absolute risk reduction in a very simple way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt

Article from 2005 explains that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein are effective in neutralizing the sars-cov1 virus. However, the sars-cov2 vaccines only target the S-protein. This is evidence that the vaccine manufacturers could have chosen to make a superior mrna vax that produced two types of antibodies, but chose to focus narrowly on just the S-protein: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/

Antibodies from vaccines start to drop within 6 months, get ready for endless boosters: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9

6. There are alternative treatments that are effective against Covid19 but they are being suppressed. Why? Because the vaccines are not approved by the FDA but instead they are emergency use authorized only. The emergency use authorization can only be granted if "there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives". Well, a growing body of scientific research is showing that both Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine (among other drugs) are adequate alternatives for early treatment of Covid19, and both of these drugs have been FDA approved for years. Unfortunately, that means they are now off patent and no one can make any money off of them. So, for the vaccines to continue to receive their EUA, the existence of these treatments must be suppressed. We have seen a huge amount of censorship of doctors who have been speaking out about these drugs.

Ivermectin:-

Emergency use authorization for the vaccines cannot be granted if there are effective alternative approved treatments for Covid19. So, if the pharmaceutical industry is going to make any money off covid, they must suppress the existence of any existing off patent drugs that may be effective in treating or preventing covid: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating Covid19: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial shows that Ivermectin is able to cure covid within 6 days for most people: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

More evidence that Ivermectin treatment leads to much faster recovery from Covid19: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880

An NIH study reveals that a five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/

Ivermectin stops replication of covid: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties against covid: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-

Ivermectin binds to Covid19 proteins to block the virus: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/

Evidence that Ivermectin can be effective as a prophylaxis, Argentinian frontline healthcare workers were given Ivermectin as a preventative and zero got sick with covid, whereas 58.2% of the control group who did not take Ivermectin got covid: https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Nota-Journal-of-Biomedical-Research-Safety-and-Efficacy-Iota-Carrageenan-and-Ivermectin.pdf

Ivermectin safe to give 12mg per day for 5 days: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712%2820%2932506-6/fulltext

Ivermectin safely administered 60mg per day for 6 months: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559

Fluvoxamine:-

Fluvoxamine helps in covid treatment: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33180097/

Covid leads to long term inflammation, useful for long haul Covid19 treatment: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33391730/

Fluvoxamine has anti-inflammatory properties that can help treat covid: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.652688/full

Fluvoxamine targets sigma-1 to stop covid replication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33403480/

7. We've known for decades that once you are infected with a virus or disease, your body creates a robust immune response, including memory T cells and B cells. These cells stick around so that you can quickly respond to a new infection. However, this fact is being completely ignored by vaccine pushers, they want a needle in every arm, even in the arms of those who do not need it, like the covid recovered. We might say, well covid is new and different, and perhaps immunity wanes after a time. This assumption was prudent in the beginning of the pandemic but now we have lots of evidence that the covid recovered have a near zero chance of getting sick again. Your body takes a few weeks and months to build up its antibodies after an infection. Most of the time the second infection takes place during this time frame. There is no reason to force every covid recovered patient to take an experimental drug, especially after that initial 3 month period after they have build up a sufficient immune response. If you still think that the miniscule chance that their immune system has failed makes them a danger, then why are these people not asked for proof of antibodies. It's because they don't actually care if you have antibodies. The vaccinated, without knowing whether they have antibodies or not, can walk around free, but a covid recovered patient, with proof of antibodies is still considered a danger. It's ass backwards and it is evidence that vax pushers don't actually care about immunity. It is just about getting a needle into every arm. The reason why they are doing this, I do not know I leave it up to you, but it doesn't make sense and I make a point of not going along with things that don't make sense.

Studies on covid recovered:-

No benefit from vaccination of previously infected individuals: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2

Covid19 infection produces long lasting immunity: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4

Second article that covid19 infection produces life long immunity: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9

More evidence that covid19 infection produces long term immunity: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.19.21255739v1

Study of 600,000 covid recovered patients finds less than 1% reinfection rate over 10 months and an almost 0% risk in the first 7 months: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209951/pdf/RMV-9999-e2260.pdf

8. There is a growing amount of data that people are having severe reactions to the vaccines. It gets little to no coverage in the press, in some cases people who talk about their reactions on social media are being censored and called anti-vaxxers (I mean, how asinine to call someone who took the jab an anti-vaxxer) or fakers (I am sure some are faking for money/attention, but I highly doubt it's many of them given the social consequences for lying). Some senators have done press conferences with these people so they can tell their stories. There are publicly accessible government databases which contain reports of people who have had adverse reactions to the vaccines. These systems were put in place in the 90's to act as a sort of early warning system and to give transparency to the public after previous botched vaccine rollouts like the 1976 swine flu vaccine debacle. You can go and read these reports for yourself. There are websites that download the reports and present them to the public in a very readable manner (the government website from the 90's is not very good). There are concerns that these reports are being made in error or by bad actors. However, research has been done into these systems and it was found that more than 80% of the adverse reactions had seemingly no other cause or explaination aside from the vaccine. In the past, if a vaccine hit 50 deaths or a few hundred adverse reactions on these reporting systems, they would shutdown the vaccination program. As of writing this, for the covid vaccines the deaths are into the thousands and the serious adverse reactions are into the hundreds of thousands. Yet they just keep rolling with the shots and now are even forcibly manadating the shot.

VAERS:-

Analysis on the VAERS death data shows that in 86% of reports the vaccine cannot be ruled out as a causal factor in the death of the patient: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Res ults_and_Analysis

Addendum to the above link. OpenVAERS is a site that allows you to easily read VAERS reports and breaks down the numbers. The reports seem to be a lot of people who have comorbidities or are old, but there are also some really eye opening cases where young people experience horrible side effects. Read for yourself and make up your own mind about what the vax is doing to your fellow Americans: https://www.openvaers.com/openvaers

9. Criminals are innocent until proven guilty, but medical drugs are not like criminals, medical drugs are guilty until proven innocent. Pharmaceutical companies must prove the innocence of their medications through long term testing. Doctors, bureaucrats, and the public seem to have forgotten this fact when they mandate a new technology to be injected into us without long term testing to prove the innocence of the drug. The vaccine may have completely unknown and serious side effects that manifest in a majority of the people only in the long term. So, the vax may appear to be safe in the short term, but in the long run it causes severe harm or even death. It is extremely risky to innoculate the entire population if we don't know what the long term effects may be. It is especially risky to vax our critical workers with an experimental drug about which we know nothing in the long term. If it turns out that within 2 years of taking it, the vaccine causes the debilitation of a large portion of the people who took it and we had forced all our healthcare professionals to take it, then our countries will lose a large portion of their healthcare professionals. This would devastate our society's ability to treat the sick and cause massive death and suffering. Same goes for the military. If we vax all our fighters, and the vax turns out to greatly physically or mentally weaken most of the people who took it, there goes our ability to defend ourselves. We won't be able to fight off any aggressors and will lose years of military experience as we will have to re-train a whole new set of recruits without the previous military leaders. If most of the laborers are vaxxed and the vax causes bodily weakness, then they won't be able to go to work and our production falls to zero. Without domestic production, we would have to rely on foreign imports but the economy would also grind to a halt so the nation would have no money to pay for these imports. This would probably be a death stroke for whatever nation was victim to it. So, force vaccinating critical workers, or even a large portion of the menial labor force, is a massive national security risk. We also have no way of calculating how large the percentage of risk is since we know nothing at all about the long term effects of innoculation with this type of technology. This could utterly destroy any highly vaxxed nations. This outcome would be so bad (total collapse of a society's infrastructure) that only a massive amount of safety data could justify innoculating the entire population with any treatment. But we just don't have that safety data for these experimental drugs right now, and will probably not have it for decades to come. By then, it will be too late to do anything about it. You can fry an egg, but you can't unfry it. Just the same, you won't be able to unvax the population, there's no way to get the vax out of the body once it's in. The solution is to only vax the old and vulnerable at risk populations and not vax everyone. This issue worries me deeply since there must be risk responsive people at high levels of government who must understand and be sensitive to this type of national security risk. Yet, these people are either being completely ignored or they are allowing the government to proceed with the risky mass vaccination programs anyway.

Separately, these 9 issues would be a concern. But put together, they are incredibly alarming. To me, something feels very wrong here. You too may have already felt it in your gut or in the back of your mind or when reading this. That feeling that something is wrong is instinct, it is the product of millions of years of evolution. A gift from our ancestors who also saw something that was wrong in their environment and had this weird bad feeling. They acted on it and it saved them. So they were able to pass on that instinct to their off-spring from generation to generation. Now, after millions of years, it finds its way to you. If you feel what I feel, that something is very wrong here, I implore you:

Do not ignore it.

[mountain_jim]

I would like to send this reddit link containing this post text, if possible - link?

[Bill Ryan]

I would like to send this reddit link containing this post text, if possible - link?I believe this is it:


https://reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/p8ov38/acceptable_reasons_for_vaccine_hesitance_w_50

[mountain_jim]

Yes I just found it while you were posting, realizing it would not be hard :)

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/p8ov38/acceptable_reasons_for_vaccine_hesitance_w_50/

[Tintin]

Another great paper from J. Bart Classen which is reconfirming what many of us here in the community are already aware concerning the dangers. I felt it best belonged here.

____________________________

[Extracted]:

Government officials are promoting COVID-19 vaccines as a way
to stop the epidemic. There is however no scientific data that the
COVID-19 vaccines can improve the health of the population. In
fact, the data from the clinical trials seems to point in the opposite
direction. Given that the population is the sum of the individuals,
and the vaccines cause a decline in health in the individuals, then
mass immunization is likely to erode the health of the general
population, not improve it. Immunization may even cause a
selection bias for new variants. Finally, if the COVID-19 outbreak
is the result of a bioweapons attack and vaccine resistant variants
represent the release of different prototypes then immunization is
almost certain to fail [10 (https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/review-of-covid19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events-including-neurological-degeneration-1616.pdf)].

__________________________

US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

Source: SciVision (https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

[meat suit]

https://www.thebernician.net/pubs-three-notice-process-to-stop-schools-vaxxing-children/

PUB’s Three Notice Process To Stop Schools Vaxxing Children

By popular and urgent demand, here lies PUB’s three notice process to deal with the clear and present threat that UK schools will be offering the experimental COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ to 12-17 year olds next month, following the JCVI’s recent u-turn on its 15/07/2021 assessment that the risk outweighed the benefits of vaxxing anybody under 18.

[mojo]

Get your Covid questions answered by Dr. Jane Ruby

Hi,
Stew Peters has a new show segment called, "Ask Dr. Jane."

Submit your questions! DrJaneRuby@protonmail.com - If you have a question, ANY QUESTION about the "planned-demic", shots, treatments or anything related to your health, get an honest and RESEARCHED, based answer from Dr. Jane Ruby!


https://rumble.com/vlytgx-monoclonal-antibodies-job-mandates-expert-answers-questions-in-new-segment-.html

vjcnbx

[Matthew]

The UK government is hell bent on vaccinating children aged 12 and up

@JamesMelville
(source tweet (https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1434042243409661952))

The UK’s vaccine advisory authority, the JCVI has decided not to recommend Covid vaccinations for 12 to 15 year-olds.

Despite that, the UK government is planning to ignore expert opinion and roll out vaccines for 12 to 15 year-olds.

The UK government is unfollowing the science.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E-a90JmWUAARdrw?format=jpg&name=medium

[Arcturian108]

In the following video, an esteemed Jewish medical doctor, who has treated many national leaders including Trump, urges a Jewish group to stop killing their own people. I would like to know the name of this doctor, but that info is not provided:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n2MLZsDyndRl/

[Gwin Ru]

In the following video, an esteemed Jewish medical doctor, who has treated many national leaders including Trump, urges a Jewish group to stop killing their own people. I would like to know the name of this doctor, but that info is not provided:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n2MLZsDyndRl/Dr. Zev Zelenko:
Dr. Zev Zelenko COVID Genocide "Very Nefarious, Sinister Purpose" (https://rumble.com/vm0fqp-dr.-zev-zelenko-covid-genocide-very-nefarious-sinister-purpose.html) 16:28

Stew Peters Show (https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters)
Published September 2, 2021

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — EXCLUSIVE! Dr. Zev Zelenko further exposes the globalist agenda to kill as many people as possible by preventing early treatment from being obtained by patients in need.

Get Dr. Zelenko's protocol here: https://zstacklife.com/?ref=BestProtocol


vje9lp

---------------------------------------------------------

Offers some advice to individuals already vaxxed.

[Tracie (Bodhicee)]

Another great paper from J. Bart Classen which is reconfirming what many of us here in the community are already aware concerning the dangers. I felt it best belonged here.

____________________________

[Extracted]:

Government officials are promoting COVID-19 vaccines as a way to stop the epidemic. There is however no scientific data that the COVID-19 vaccines can improve the health of the population. In fact, the data from the clinical trials seems to point in the opposite direction. Given that the population is the sum of the individuals, and the vaccines cause a decline in health in the individuals, then mass immunization is likely to erode the health of the general population, not improve it. Immunization may even cause a selection bias for new variants. Finally, if the COVID-19 outbreak is the result of a bioweapons attack and vaccine resistant variants represent the release of different prototypes then immunization is almost certain to fail [10 (https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/review-of-covid19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events-including-neurological-degeneration-1616.pdf)]. __________________________

US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

Source: SciVision (https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

Here in Oz, the link fails/won't load.




Mod note from Bill:
I checked, and nothing here needs fixing... it seems that https://www.scivisionpub.com (and the PDF at https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf) have security certificate issues.
HOWEVER,
http://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
(https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)(without the 's' after the http) DOES load, and you just have to click that slightly different link to get there).
:thumbsup:

[Delight]

In the following video, an esteemed Jewish medical doctor, who has treated many national leaders including Trump, urges a Jewish group to stop killing their own people. I would like to know the name of this doctor, but that info is not provided:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n2MLZsDyndRl/Dr. Zev Zelenko:
Dr. Zev Zelenko COVID Genocide "Very Nefarious, Sinister Purpose" (https://rumble.com/vm0fqp-dr.-zev-zelenko-covid-genocide-very-nefarious-sinister-purpose.html) 16:28

Stew Peters Show (https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters)
Published September 2, 2021

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — EXCLUSIVE! Dr. Zev Zelenko further exposes the globalist agenda to kill as many people as possible by preventing early treatment from being obtained by patients in need.

Get Dr. Zelenko's protocol here: https://zstacklife.com/?ref=BestProtocol


vje9lp

---------------------------------------------------------

Offers some advice to individuals already vaxxed.



Another interview here but go to 2:03:03 for the message apropos of avoiding this jab. BTW support the highwire please. IMO this program is one of the sharp point of swords/spears on our collective behalf.

EPISODE 231: FEAST OF CONSEQUENCES (https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-231-feast-of-consequences/)

[ronny]

Another great paper from J. Bart Classen which is reconfirming what many of us here in the community are already aware concerning the dangers. I felt it best belonged here.

____________________________

[Extracted]:

Government officials are promoting COVID-19 vaccines as a way to stop the epidemic. There is however no scientific data that the COVID-19 vaccines can improve the health of the population. In fact, the data from the clinical trials seems to point in the opposite direction. Given that the population is the sum of the individuals, and the vaccines cause a decline in health in the individuals, then mass immunization is likely to erode the health of the general population, not improve it. Immunization may even cause a selection bias for new variants. Finally, if the COVID-19 outbreak is the result of a bioweapons attack and vaccine resistant variants represent the release of different prototypes then immunization is almost certain to fail [10 (https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/review-of-covid19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events-including-neurological-degeneration-1616.pdf)]. __________________________

US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

Source: SciVision (https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

Here in Oz, the link fails/won't load.




Mod note from Bill:
I checked, and nothing here needs fixing... it seems that https://www.scivisionpub.com (and the PDF at https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf) have security certificate issues.
HOWEVER,
http://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
(https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)(without the 's' after the http) DOES load, and you just have to click that slightly different link to get there).
:thumbsup:


all links don't work in South Africa either incl. the "http:" one

[thepainterdoug]

does anyone have a clue how vaccines such as this covid mRNA jab are made in such millions of multiples?

is it like jello shots? college kids pour cheep vodka into vats of jello, stir it up and pour into plastic cups? being flippant of course, but how do they get the exact amount of materials into each dose?

anyone know this process?

[Delight]

Below is a very good short piece that is about the mandates of the jab for the SAME people who for 18 months cared for the "covid victims" without jabs, adequate PPE and THEY HARDLY EVER GOT SICK or passed the illness on. There are points made that supercede the single focus on healthcare workers.

You cannot think that this is about health when you contemplate the matter. This IS about breaking the Spirit and destroying our civilization on every level. It is about making assault and battery the order of the day. It is about creating savages who will murder one another in body and mind out of desperation.

The take away I have come to think is happening:

1. The Plan to take down western civilization is BRILLIANT. It is deploying every kind of manipulation ever imaginable to DEVOLVE US NOW and there is literally no where to go PHYSICALLY and geographically.
2. The take down of the health care system is part of the plan along with every system that manages the physical plane. It is antithetical to LIFE.
3. It IS now every "man" for himself in the sense that the plan's intent is the death and destruction of every HUMANE avenue of support for LIFE.
4. Most Minions who have "bought big" into the system will go down too along with those who object.

IMO there is a way OUT but it is seemingly woowoo. This WAY is by turning within, turning away from the systems, turning TO our own REAL but esoteric relationship to a HIGHER POWER. THEN we can walk out a DOOR that WILL appear in each and every life one by one. This is unimaginable in the paradigm of materialism and "fact based evidence" but if you ask people who have been there and done that, they will tell you how they found the door.

IMO in my life time, the stage has been set to make a choice. The choice must now be declared. The situation looks so dire when one has no FAITH and I feel very compassionate for those who have not yet opened their heart center where this connection comes in.

This is not necessarily about avoiding death. It is about LIVING life while we live it. However, there are enough NDE stories etc. to show that there is WAY MORE MAGIC than we ever embraced and it is not the magic of the EVIL INVERSIONS. There is a HIGHER POWER we can find which is a real daily sustanence.

In the past, people have been disappointed INTENTIONALLY by the coopting of this HIGHER POWER by religion. The place I found the truth best expressed was in Alcoholics Anon and all the Anon programs. BUT the message even there was distorted, because it is NOT JUST for alcoholics or addicts and the idea that the behavioral issue IS alcohol OR ANY ADDICTIVE ISSUE is a distortion. The issue is physicalism (that everything is ultimately ONLY physical in nature) and Ignorance that ALL begins on a spiritual level of reality and the helpless isolation without GOD (as one will know God).

MY 12 steps

Step 1: admit powerless over physicalism
Step 2: accept that a higher power, in whatever form, will restore your sanity
Step 3: make a decision to turn your will and life over to a higher power
Step 4: take a moral inventory of yourself
Step 5: admit to a higher power, another human, and yourself the nature of your wrongdoings
Step 6: accept that a higher power will remove your character defects
Step 7: humbly request the higher power remove your shortcomings
Step 8: list people you hurt during your addiction to physicalism and be willing to make amends
Step 9: make amends to those people unless it would harm them
Step 10: continue to take a personal inventory, and when you’re wrong, admit it
Step 11: use prayer and meditation to connect with the higher power
Step 12: carry the message of being a spiritual being FIRST and continue to practice the principles of the 12 steps in your daily life.


vjh72o

[Tracie (Bodhicee)]

Another great paper from J. Bart Classen which is reconfirming what many of us here in the community are already aware concerning the dangers. I felt it best belonged here.

____________________________

[Extracted]:

Government officials are promoting COVID-19 vaccines as a way to stop the epidemic. There is however no scientific data that the COVID-19 vaccines can improve the health of the population. In fact, the data from the clinical trials seems to point in the opposite direction. Given that the population is the sum of the individuals, and the vaccines cause a decline in health in the individuals, then mass immunization is likely to erode the health of the general population, not improve it. Immunization may even cause a selection bias for new variants. Finally, if the COVID-19 outbreak is the result of a bioweapons attack and vaccine resistant variants represent the release of different prototypes then immunization is almost certain to fail [10 (https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/review-of-covid19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events-including-neurological-degeneration-1616.pdf)]. __________________________

US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

Source: SciVision (https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

Here in Oz, the link fails/won't load.




Mod note from Bill:
I checked, and nothing here needs fixing... it seems that https://www.scivisionpub.com (and the PDF at https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf) have security certificate issues.
HOWEVER,
http://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
(https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf)(without the 's' after the http) DOES load, and you just have to click that slightly different link to get there).
:thumbsup:


Thanks Bill.

*update*: lol sorry, I'm still not able to get it to load, despite your careful work. No matter! Thanks again.





It'll load if you


copy the http (with no 's') link to a browser bar on a separate page, and then
IF the browser automatically adds the 's', manually delete the 's' and reload the link. It takes a bit of fiddling, but it IS accessible. Not optimum, though!

[Billy]

Neil Oliver, Author, archeologist, historian and Father speaks out against vaccination for children.

kIqOh2XDwXk

[Matthew]

I had to check this but it's reported along MSM.

Morrisons cuts sick pay for non-jabbed workers after ‘biblical’ pandemic costs
Pay changes part of plans to mitigate supply chain crisis as company prepares to be auctioned off amid profit slump

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/sep/09/morrisons-profit-drops-as-firm-warns-over-supply-chain-crisis


But the headline doesn't characterise it.

They're stopping the sick-pay which is paid when people have to self-isolate because of a covid infection. I suppose that might include when they are infected and sick with something that tests posative for covid, be it covid or a PCR misdiagnosis. Its a nasty attack on these people because even if they are healthy, they are forced out of pocket possibly for no fault of their own

Quote:

...
Potts said Morrisons was tackling the “biblical costs of managing Covid” after being on the “front foot” in helping workers stay safe during the pandemic. “We are normalising some of those policies,” he said, citing cutting sick pay for unvaccinated workers who needed to self-isolate as a good example.

He said the move was also intended to encourage workers to get themselves vaccinated.
...

[janette]

Bloody awful 😣

[onawah]

More about vaccines causing polio
Did Vaccines Really Eliminate Polio? COVID-19 Shots Linked to Guillain-Barré Syndrome – Common Side Effect of Vaccines that Resembles Polio
September 10, 2021
https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/did-vaccines-really-eliminate-polio-covid-19-shots-linked-to-guillain-barre-syndrome-common-side-effect-of-vaccines-that-resembles-polio/
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/09/did-vaccines-eliminate-polio-2.jpg

"FiercePharma, the pharmaceutical’s trade publication, reported yesterday that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was adding Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) as a side effect to the AstraZeneca COVID-19 shot.

This comes two months after the FDA issued a similar warning for GBS on the Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 shots.

Two months after the FDA flagged Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine for the rare nerve disorder Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) Europe’s drug regulator has done the same for AstraZeneca’s COVID shot.

The European Medicines Agency will now list GBS as a possible and “very rare” side effect of Vaxzevria, which is administered as a two-dose regimen.

GBS is a condition in which the immune system attacks nerves and can cause temporary paralysis and breathing problems. Along with the warning, the EMA recommends that AZ vaccine recipients should seek medical attention if they feel weakness and paralysis in the extremities. (Source.)

The paralysis is not always “temporary,” however, and based on years of statistics on vaccine injuries, especially for the flu shot, the evidence suggests that it is not that “rare” at all.

If you have not yet watched the 60 Minutes show on the 1976 Swine Flu scandal that Mike Wallace covered in 1979, it is worth your time to watch it.

1976 Swine Flu Scandal: The CDC’s History of Lying About Vaccine Dangers and Effectiveness
In this segment of 60 Minutes from 1979, Wallace interviews a woman who took the Swine Flu vaccine and suffered permanent damage with paralysis from GBS after getting the flu shot. She represented thousands of victims who suffered from this paralysis who were trying to sue the government for damages.

Once the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program was put into law by Ronald Reagan in 1986, the Department of Justice was required to issue a quarterly report on vaccine injuries and deaths that were settled in the Vaccine Court.

We started publishing these reports every quarter starting in 2013, and you can find a list of them here.

In all of these quarterly reports, the seasonal flu shot was the most compensated vaccine for injuries and death, and in most quarters GBS was the number 1 side effect.

Here is an example of one report we covered in 2014 that showed how many people were injured or killed by the flu shot with GBS being the main side effect (please note this article is 7 years old so some of the links are broken now):

Victims Crippled and Killed by the Flu Shot Compensated by U.S. Government
That same year, a nurse’s aide who was crippled with GBS due to the flu shot that she was mandated to receive as a condition of employment, sued the government and settled the case for $11.6 million. (Again, this article is 7 years old and the link to the original article no longer works. You can find it on Archive.org though.)

Nurse’s Aide Awarded $11.6 Million for Being Paralyzed by Mandatory Flu Vaccine
We actually had a reader contact us years ago who went into an emergency room with symptoms of GBS, and that reader told us that the first question the ER doctor asked her was: “Did you recently get a flu shot?”

This is further evidence that GBS is not so rare as the pharmaceutical companies and the CDC would like us to believe.

GBS is almost always diagnosed based on the symptoms, and it shares the same symptoms of several other illnesses, including Transverse Myelitis (another common vaccine side effect including COVID-19 shots), Acute Flaccid Myelitis, and Polio.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, for example, was originally thought to be afflicted with Polio which gave him permanent paralysis and forced him into a wheel chair, but in recent times many people believe he actually had GBS. (One source here.)

So what about COVID-19 shots?

GBS is now acknowledged as a side effect for at least 2 of them, but since it shares symptoms that are almost identical to other labeled illnesses, how many injuries are we seeing with “Polio-like” symptoms?

If you search the VAERS database for adverse reactions to all the current COVID-19 shots, you won’t find much for “polio.” After all, we eliminated Polio through vaccination, right?

How about if we search for GBS, Transverse Myelitis, Acute Flaccid Myelitis? I ran those searches, and here are the results:

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/09/GBS-like-symptoms.jpg

The search returned 1,158 cases, including 20 deaths, 304 permanent disabilities, 155 life threatening events, and 831 hospitalizations.
However, if we do a search just on all symptoms of “paralysis,” to catch all the possible disease names that might be associated with something that might be similar to GBS or Polio, we cast a much wider net with many more results:

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/09/paraylisis-COVID-19-vaccines.jpg

This search, which does not include GBS, Transverse Myelitis, or Acute Flaccid Myelitis, returns another 5,145 cases, with another 52 deaths, 546 permanent disabilities, 1,472 ER visits, 1,142 hospitalizations, and 219 life threatening events. (Note: I did not include all different kind of paralysis in the graphic, but you can see them here.)
So after reviewing the data regarding GBS, and other disease names that exhibit similar symptoms to GBS, the question that begs to be answered is: Was Polio really eliminated by vaccines? Or did they just simply rename the symptoms to make it look like Polio was eradicated?

Because Polio is always referred to as the “Gold Standard” example of how vaccines eliminated one of the worst viruses of the 20th Century.

The person who has spent much of her career studying Polio and Polio vaccines and has presented some of the most comprehensive information based on facts and the medical literature, is Dr. Suzanne Humphries.

She presented her research, titled: “Smoke, Mirrors, and the ‘Disappearance’ of Polio,” in 2012 at the Association of Natural Health Conference. It is still on YouTube (we have it in this 2013 article), but the lighting is bad and it is over an hour long.

Brad Kaye edited it down to just 30 minutes and replaced most of the graphics on his YouTube channel, but because YouTube is now purging anything critical of vaccines from its platform, we have a copy on our Rumble and Bitchute channels as well.

There is one section in the longer version that I wish had been kept, and that is a major section on the wonders of breastfeeding, and how children who were breastfed as opposed to infant formula fed, did not get Polio. But you can watch that section here in the longer version, and if it is removed from YouTube just let us know, as we have a back-up copy we can publish if need be.

Oh, and when people who believe Polio was eliminated through vaccines tell you: “You don’t see any iron lungs around anymore, do you?” – you can tell them: “Yes, that’s true, because that was old technology. What has replaced iron lungs today are ventilators.”

Yes, the same ventilators that Congress and President Trump spent $BILLIONS on in 2020, many of which are still sitting in warehouses today unused. Yes, the same ventilators that hospitals today get huge financial kickbacks from the government every time they put a patient on it following “COVID-19 protocol”, and which few patients survive.

Those ventilators are what have replaced “iron lungs.”

This is a video you are absolutely going to love and learn much from if you have never seen it before.

It has all the ingredients to cook up a “virus” and full-blown “pandemic”: labeling a “virus,” huge controversies over being able to actually test for that virus and identify it, a huge outbreak near a laboratory that was apparently trying to weaponize the virus, silencing and discrediting doctors with opposing views, massive government spending on advertising to convince the public that this virus was going to wipe out humanity if people did not go out and get the vaccine they created for it, using celebrities to endorse it, and catastrophic injuries and deaths resulting from a rushed to market new experimental vaccine.

Sound familiar? The playbook doesn’t change much over the years."

https://rumble.com/vmaxiq-did-the-polio-vaccine-really-eradicate-polio.html
OvRmACaoo0m1

[Tintin]

From Doctors For Covid Ethics, published today:


"The good news is that we are more comprehensively protected against COVID-19 by our own pre-existing immunity than was previously understood"


1.Vaccination against COVID-19 is unnecessary. Populations are protected by their immune systems against COVID-19. This applies to SARS-CoV-2 in all its variants.
2. Booster shots are uniquely dangerous, in a way that is unprecedented in the history of vaccines. This is because repeatedly boosting the immune response will repeatedly boost the intensity of self-to-self attack.

---------------------------

Source: https://doctors4covidethics.org/boosting-blood-clots-and-leaky-vessels-the-dangers-of-covid-19-vaccines-and-booster-shots/

The Dangers of Booster Shots and COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’: Boosting Blood Clots and Leaky Vessels

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Booster-shot-conveyor-belt.png

New discoveries in the immunology of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 vaccines

What happens inside your body after injection with gene-based COVID-19 vaccines? How does this new ‘vaccination’ technology differ from usual vaccination methods, and why is that dangerous?

What causes blood clots after vaccination? How common is that likely to be, and is it really true that COVID-19 vaccination can cause blood vessels to leak? If so, what does that mean for the safety of booster shots?


In this document, we answer all those questions, based on the latest and best available science. We explain how several papers in 2021 significantly advanced our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, and therefore the science and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Unfortunately, as the COVID-19 vaccination programme has followed a policy of ‘vaccinate first – research later’, our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity has only recently caught up with the rushed vaccination schedule.

Given that no clinical trials involved more than two injections of any vaccine, it is important that doctors and patients understand where the latest science leaves us in terms of how the vaccines interact with the immune system, and the implications for booster shots.

We explain here that booster shots are uniquely dangerous, in a way that is unprecedented in the history of vaccines. That is because repeatedly boosting the immune response will repeatedly boost the intensity of self-to-self attack.


Please take the time to read this important information, and share.

The findings are presented in summary form for those who would like an overview, followed by an explanation of the underlying immunology for those who wish to understand in more detail.

Link to the full document (https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Vaccine-immune-interactions-and-booster-shots_Sep-2021.pdf).

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Vaccine-immune-interactions-and-booster-shots_Sep-2021.pdf

[Arcturian108]

Something unbelievable has just happened--the FDA rejected approval of the booster shots in a panel decision by 16-3:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-panel-votes-16-3-against-approving-pfizer-covid-19-booster-shots_4002895.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp

[Matthew]

Something unbelievable has just happened--the FDA rejected approval of the booster shots in a panel decision by 16-3:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-panel-votes-16-3-against-approving-pfizer-covid-19-booster-shots_4002895.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp

That non-bizarre move sure is unexpected :confused:. And I just had a flash image from my imagination: a world where the die-hard covid believers are a minor annoyance, not an existential threat


...
Those researchers also expressed concern that the boosters may cause more side-effects for individuals, which would increase the hesitancy of unvaccinated individuals in getting the vaccine—not just the booster.

As of Friday midday trading, shares of Moderna Inc. and BioNTech plunged by around 4.93 percent and 4.91 percent, respectively.

[mountain_jim]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/264/002/original/df308fd168bfb9c3.png



https://twitter.com/AdamBaldwin/status/1438985701329047553?s=20

1438985701329047553

[Matthew]

https://twitter.com/AlexGiorgio6/status/1438921789552398336
Alex Giorgio, @AlexGiorgio6 (twitter)
BOOM 🔥 🔥
General Dynamics Corporation just cancelled their vaxx mandate.40% of their employees remained unvxxd & were prepared to walk.


edit oops all I did was re-post your post mountain_jim. Derp for me :bigsmile:

[Matthew]

More sane events reported


Steve Kirsch
@stkirsch (twitter)
NEJM published a correction... they now admit that there is no evidence that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women. Whoops. Took them months to respond to our group. Look for the "1" at the VERY top of the page.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejme2107070

Source: twitter (https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1438696296882139142)

[mountain_jim]

Update and note: I first got post from Ciff High twitter - now reminded that I can't assume info there (or anywhere) has been verified when no source provided)

https://gab.com/MajorPatriot

https://gab.com/MajorPatriot/posts/106952098434745164




Major Patriot
@MajorPatriot

2h
·
Be wary of the General Dynamics story canceling vaccine mandates for their employees. It doesn't make sense and there is no sourcing for the story.
253 likes



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/317/317/original/22f6e4063b707c91.jpg

[Did You See Them]

Simple question which may have been answered but if you have any of the vaccines do you become patented ?

[Pam]

Simple question which may have been answered but if you have any of the vaccines do you become patented ?

Good question...I'm kind of thinking that they pull that rabbit out of the hat down the road at one level or another.

[Tintin]

I was reminded of this earlier and it is well to consider that this is PHE (Public Health England) consent guidance.
Consent

It is a legal and ethical principle that valid consent must be obtained before starting personal care, treatment or investigations. This reflects the rights of individuals to decide what happens to their own bodies and consent is a fundamental principle of good healthcare and professional practice.

Healthcare professionals (or other non-registered healthcare workers) who do not respect these principles may be liable to legal action and/or action by their professional body.Anybody who is experiencing any undue pressure may wish to print a copy of this out and have it to hand.

Source: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/994850/PHE_Greenbook_of_immunisation_chapter_2_consent_18_June21.pdf

https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Covid-19_Vaccines/PHE_Greenbook_guidance_on_immunisation_%28Consent%29/PHE_Greenbook_of_immunisation_chapter_2_consent_18_June21.pdf

[mojo]

This Nurses story is sad...

https://rumble.com/vn2ulr-nurse-whistleblower-breaks-down-cries-in-live-tell-all-interview.html

vkgoh1

[Tintin]

A little too large to embed here so the abstract may have to suffice.

Source: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/68/80/73/6a17a66e9ec8c5/US11107588.pdf

Google Patent link: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11107588B2/en?oq=11107588

Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals



ABSTRACT
System and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for
treatment against an infectious disease caused by a patho
gen . The system comprises a plurality of electronic devices
comprising instructions to generate an ID and , when in
proximity of another such electronic device , one or both
electronic devices transmit / receive the ID to / from the other
electronic device . Then , a score is generated based on a
plurality of such received IDs . Additionally , based on infor
mation received from a server , relevant treatment instruc
tions are displayed to the subjects based on the received
information and the score . The server comprises instructions
for sending to the plurality of electronic devices the infor
mation to be displayed with the relevant treatment instruc
tions , additionally the server and / or the electronic devices
comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood
of a subject transmitting the pathogen , based on the score of
the subject

An associated tweet:

1446026668037054466

[mountain_jim]

^
Based on the links in the post, and while I only skimmed the patent text, I see no indication in that patent that the vaccinated body is the device on the IOT, written more like it's a smart phone and app.

The What is this? text implies much that is not in that patent, and to me that is a little disingenuous to state that as the clear purpose of the patent until the body contents as a communications device are more proven, and also patented perhaps.

Not saying it's not possible or planned, but that patent does not cover the body as device component explicitly in my view

(welcome to change my mind).

[Tintin]

^
Based on the links in the post, and while I only skimmed the patent text, I see no indication in that patent that the vaccinated body is the device on the IOT, written more like it's a smart phone and app.

The What is this? text implies much that is not in that patent, and to me that is a little disingenuous to state that as the clear purpose of the patent until the body contents as a communications device are more proven, and also patented perhaps.

Not saying it's not possible or planned, but that patent does not cover the body as device component explicitly in my view

(welcome to change my mind).

Yes, I actually do concur here - it was an initial thought for me too.

The speculative conclusion atop the patent clip is I think just that - here's a classic 'watch this space' situation here as it may not be unfounded, in time. Still, that this patent was approved for its stated aims gives one real pause, for concern.

[Tintin]

From The Lancet correspondence page, July 6th, 2021.




A woman aged 78 years with a history
of IgA vasculitis with leukocytoclastic
vasculitis, and renal and gastrointestinal
involvement, had been in remission for
2 years with no immunosuppressant
medication, before receiving the
mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19
vaccine. At day seven post-vaccination,
the patient had diarrhoea (6 times per
day) and diffuse abdominal pain with
acute onset (appendix p 1). Her vaccines
were up to date, including yearly
influenza, and previous vaccinations
had never caused an IgA vasculitis
reactivation. She had not taken any
new medication and showed no signs
of any infection including SARS-CoV-2
before vaccination with mRNA-1273,
at admission to hospital, or during
hospitalisation

Source: Avalon Library (https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Covid-19_Vaccines/Articles/Reactivation_of_IgA_vasculitis_after_COVID-19_vaccination_%28Lancet_correspondence%29_2021-07-06.pdf)

https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronavirus_%28Wuhan_2019-nCov%29/Covid-19_Vaccines/Articles/Reactivation_of_IgA_vasculitis_after_COVID-19_vaccination_%28Lancet_correspondence%29_2021-07-06.pdf

[Matthew]

Peppa Pig gets a vaccination. Peppa Pig is a VERY popular British children's character.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBHb0-pWYAUqKu-?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBHb1IeXIAAhfQt?format=jpg&name=small

Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke

I HOPE THIS IS FAKE
https://twitter.com/ninnyd101/status/1446002338209087488
Ninnyd Flag of United Kingdom Red heart Flag of United States Waiting~4~the Revolution, @ninnyd101
Just in time for Christmas a updated covid doll.
With all the crap that comes with it.
Indoctrinating the Kids with the toys
<There's a video of an advert showing a classic child's plastic doll with a range of covid paraphernalia including a heat testing gun, a covid test, a vaccination syringe and a vaccination card/pass ...all for the child to apply to the doll>

[Kryztian]

Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke

I HOPE THIS IS FAKE
https://twitter.com/ninnyd101/status/1446002338209087488
Ninnyd Flag of United Kingdom Red heart Flag of United States Waiting~4~the Revolution, @ninnyd101
Just in time for Christmas a updated covid doll.
With all the crap that comes with it.
Indoctrinating the Kids with the toys
<There's a video of an advert showing a classic child's plastic doll with a range of covid paraphernalia including a heat testing gun, a covid test, a vaccination syringe and a vaccination card/pass ...all for the child to apply to the doll>

Alas, it is a real product.

https://www.nenucofamosa.es/juguetes/nenuco-estas-malito/

Showing kids how you can be vaccinated over and over again should prepare them for life of continuous booster shots. :facepalm:

https://www.nenucofamosa.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Nenuco-estas-malito1-600x500.jpg


Nenuco, ¿Estás Malito?

¿Nenuco está malito? Necesitamos comprobarlo con los accesorios incluidos: termómetro con luz real, test, pañuelo de papel, jarabe, cuchara, chupete, vacuna, tiritas de colores, y cartilla de vacunación en papel con un porta cartillas de tela.
El termómetro tiene luz de verdad. Y cuando le haces el test a Nenuco, aparecerá una cara roja o verde al azar. Nenuco es un muñeco de 35cm de cuerpo duro. Puedes vestir y desvestir al muñeco y la ropa se puede lavar. El muñeco puede beber agua.

From Google translate: Is Nenuco sick? We need to check it with the included accessories: thermometer with real light, test, tissue, syrup, spoon, pacifier, vaccine, colored strips, and paper vaccination card with a cloth card holder.
The thermometer has real light. And when you test Nenuco, a random red or green face will appear. Nenuco is a 35cm doll with a hard body. You can dress and undress the doll and the clothes can be washed. The doll can drink water.

[Matthew]

:facepalm:

https://i.postimg.cc/wTNm2fmT/nenuco.png

[Michel Leclerc]

Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke
(...)

Alas, it is a real product.

¿Nenuco está malito? Necesitamos comprobarlo con los accesorios incluidos: termómetro con luz real, test, pañuelo de papel, jarabe, cuchara, chupete, vacuna, tiritas de colores, y cartilla de vacunación en papel con un porta cartillas de tela.
El termómetro tiene luz de verdad. Y cuando le haces el test a Nenuco, aparecerá una cara roja o verde al azar. Nenuco es un muñeco de 35cm de cuerpo duro. Puedes vestir y desvestir al muñeco y la ropa se puede lavar. El muñeco puede beber agua.

From Google translate: Is Nenuco sick? We need to check it with the included accessories: thermometer with real light, test, tissue, syrup, spoon, pacifier, vaccine, colored strips, and paper vaccination card with a cloth card holder.
The thermometer has real light. And when you test Nenuco, a random red or green face will appear. Nenuco is a 35cm doll with a hard body. You can dress and undress the doll and the clothes can be washed. The doll can drink water.

For more than half a century children have been taught that they are plastic dolls and have been treated as such, so that when on a whim of one of the parents they get a doll that bites or scratches when they hit their doll bodies, cat and dog pets end up near roadkill hotspots.

Now, exactly like when teen fashion and ICT geekiness are used to inflect their parents’ buying behaviour, it is the plastic dolls who those kids are will not only want to be injected with all kinds of stuff, but their parents will take their clue and do as they’re told (their kids do).

Adults are after all only just kids, or even babies, and ultimately dolls.

They can be infantilised, raped, organ-harvested, and disappeared in the waste incinerators.

[Arcturian108]

This is the attitude that beats the agenda:

6tLTy0vEKJkP

[Arcturian108]

Mainstream news right now is that Southwest Airlines caved under pressure from their employees, and will not put them on unpaid leave if they are not vaccinated. There is power in collective pushback:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/southwest-vaccine-mandate-unpaid-leave-exemptions.html

[Matthew]

Oof. 5-11 year olds are one of the safest groups from covid, so 17-0 is ridiculous.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1453101825402576899
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv
JUST IN - FDA panel votes 17-0 to endorse #COVID19 vaccines for kids 5-11 years old in the US.

[Tintin]

Published 2 days ago in Cellular & Molecular Immunology; (link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00779-5)

Source PDF (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-021-00779-5.pdf)

The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variant A.30 is heavily mutated and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency

[Extracted]:


Compared to the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1, which
circulated in the early phase of the pandemic, the S protein of
the A.30 variant contains 10 amino acid substitutions and five
deletions (Fig. 1a and Supplementary information, Fig. S1a). All
deletions along with four substitutions are found in the
N-terminal domain of the surface unit S1, which harbors an
antigenic supersite that is targeted by most neutralizing
antibodies not directed against the receptor-binding domain
(RBD) [5]. In addition, three mutations are located inside the
RBD, which binds to the cellular receptor ACE2 and constitutes
the main target of neutralizing antibodies




............In summary, A.30 exhibits a cell line preference not observed
for other viral variants and efficiently evades neutralization by
antibodies elicited by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-021-00779-5.pdf

[RunningDeer]

BOOSTER DANGER: 10 Times More Potent Than First Shots (14 min)




Note: the article is from the video below.


EXCLUSIVE – VAERS data shows 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced and the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA




On October 31st we exclusively revealed how an investigation of the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) found extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

That investigation also led to the discovery that 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people than the 4,289 different lt number of Pfizer vaccine distributed to 12 states or less.

However, the most shocking finding of the investigation was that 100% of Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS with identified lot numbers had been caused by just 5% of the batches produced. But the deeply troubling findings don’t end there, because we decided to conduct further analysis of the VAERS data on the Covid-19 vaccines, and we’ve discovered that the majority of the deadliest batches were clearly sent to Republican controlled red states across the USA.

article continues (https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/03/majority-deadliest-batches-of-covid-19-vaccine-were-sent-to-red-republican-states/)



https://i0.wp.com/theexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/image-63.png?resize=768%2C465&ssl=1


http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/smilies/red-line.gif



BOOSTER DANGER: 10 Times More Potent Than First Shots (14 min)




source (https://rumble.com/vool6v-booster-danger-10-times-more-potent-than-first-shots.html)
10 Times More Potent begins @ 8 min.

Dr. Jane Ruby joined "The Stew Peters Show" for the weekly "Ask Dr. Jane" segment, at which time Ruby announced that new findings suggest the booster shots are "10 times more potent" than the first series of shots that are responsible for the death of nearly 20,000 documented on just the VAERS site, which it has been said only represents as little as 1% of the actual adverse events.

The Exposé: VAERS data shows 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced and the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA

Get Dr. Zelenko's Anti-Shedding Treatment, NOW AVAILABLE FOR KIDS: www.zStackProtocol.com


vm2f2f

[Matthew]

Darren stood as an independent candidate in the previous council elections for Peverell in Plymouth, UK. He tweeted this, below. I didn't notice these figures before but it speaks volumes.

The volumes speak volumes



@DarrenPlymouth
UK population 70 million, give or take.

UK vaccine stock, 517 million doses.

Overkill don't you think?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1xn4IWWYAQFS1O?format=png&name=small


Source tweet (https://twitter.com/DarrenPlymouth/status/1395104423815389190)


>=---={}===-----=<



The 𝓷th jab will set you free. They said it was 2 jabs for holidays but actually it turns out to be a jab every six months. Holidays have nothing to do with it other than being the blatant anecdotal carrot. We don't seem to be getting closer to the carrot.
.
.
.
.
.
.

~-+--<>==##--,'{@}



EXCLUSIVE: No booster... no hassle-free foreign travel: Ministers are drawing up plans to bring back tests and quarantine for those who refuse third Covid jab
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10173159/Covid-plans-ban-hassle-free-foreign-travel-fail-jab.html
Plans to reimpose quarantine and testing for those who have refused third vaccine are currently being drawn up by Ministers to protect UK against spread of new coronavirus variants

Likely to prove controversial if introduced before most of those eligible for booster have received it. So far, only 60% have done so
The move would change the definition of 'fully vaccinated' from having had two jabs to three
Officials are divided over how soon to implement the measure and are discussing a grace period
This would let people travel without quarantine if they had sought a booster six months after their second jab but had not yet been offered an appointment

By GLEN OWEN and ANNA MIKHAILOVA FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 22:06, 6 November 2021 | UPDATED: 22:21, 6 November 2021

British travellers who fail to take their booster jabs face renewed restrictions, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Plans to reimpose quarantine and testing for those who have refused their third vaccine are currently being drawn up by Ministers to protect the UK against the spread of new coronavirus variants.

But they are likely to prove controversial if introduced before most of those eligible for their booster have received it. So far, only 60 per cent have done so.

The move would change the definition of 'fully vaccinated' from having had two jabs to three.

Officials are divided over how soon to implement the measure and are discussing a grace period that would allow people to travel without quarantine if they had sought a booster six months after their second jab but had not yet been offered an appointment.
...

[onawah]

Why No One Can Force You to Get the COVID Jab
What You Need to Know About Comirnaty
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
November 07, 2021
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/11/07/comirnaty-vaccine.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&sd=20110604&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20211107Z1&mid=DM1031581&rid=1315259576

jtMKzuKfAlR3

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label.
No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same
A licensed vaccine is not shielded from liability until or unless it’s added to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule by the CDC.
So, if you were injured by Comirnaty, you could sue Pfizer. You cannot sue if injured by the EUA Pfizer shot (or any of the other EUA COVID injections)
Even though several hundred claims have been filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for injuries resulting from the COVID shots — which is the only possible avenue to obtain damages — not a single claim has been paid out
Natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wanes within a few months.
The shots may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with COVID
Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the government has done it anyway.
Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but the CHD has not given up and is still pursuing the case

"In this interview, Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist specializing in toxicology, vaccine-induced illnesses and Gulf War illness, shares her insights into the dangers of the COVID jab, which received an emergency use authorization October 26, 2021, for children as young as 5.

We also discuss the conflicts of interest within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that seem to be behind this reckless decision, and how the agency pulled the wool over our eyes with its approval of Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID injection.

Is the COVID Jab Approved or Not?
As explained by Nass:

“All of the COVID ‘vaccines,’ and most of the COVID treatment products, have not been [FDA] approved. Approved means licensed. All except one, which is the Pfizer vaccine for adults, age 16 and up, which got approved, i.e., licensed on August 23 [2021].

But every other vaccine, and for every other age group, including the boosters, have only been authorized under emergency use authorizations (EUAs). There's a critical difference . Once a drug is fully licensed, it is subject to liability.

If the company injures you with that product, you can sue them, unless it later gets put on the CDC’s childhood schedule or is recommended by the CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] [during] pregnancy, in which case it obtains a different liability shield.

It then becomes part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP, established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act), and 75 cents from every dose of vaccine that is sold in the United States goes into a fund to pay for injuries that way.”

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act removed liability for all vaccines recommended by the CDC for children. Since 2016, they’ve also removed liability for vaccines given to pregnant women, a category that has become the latest “gold rush” for vaccines. Naturally, once a company is no longer liable for injuries, the profitability of the product in question increases dramatically.

[B]Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program Is Nearly Useless
Products under emergency use have their own special government program for liability called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). “It is a terrible program,” Nass says. CICP is an offshoot of the 2005 PREP Act.

“The PREP act enabled the CICP to be created by Congress,” Nass explains. “Congress has to allocate money for it. If you are injured by an emergency use product, you don't get any legal process. The companies have had all their liability waived. There is a single process that is administered through HHS [Health and Human Services].

Some employees there decide whether you deserve to be compensated or not. The maximum in damages you can obtain is about $370,000 if you're totally disabled or die, and the money is only to compensate you for lost wages or unpaid medical bills.”

So far, even though several hundred CICP claims have been filed for injuries resulting from the COVID shots, not a single claim has been paid out. This is important, because the statute of limitations is one year. “It's getting close to running out for people who were vaccinated early,” Nass says.

If you fail to apply in time, you lose the opportunity to get any compensation entirely. “Of course, in fact, it's really ‘an opportunity’ to apply and get nothing because almost nobody gets paid,” she says. At that point, you have no further recourse. There’s no appeals process to the judicial system.

“You can ask the HHS twice to compensate you, and if they say no, that's it,” Nass explains. “You can attempt to sue the company that made the product, if you're convinced it was improperly made, but the secretary of HHS has to give you the permission to sue.

You have to prove that there was willful misconduct and no one has ever reached that bar. So, there has never been a lawsuit under this. Anyway, that's what you're looking at. If you get the vaccine under EUA and are injured, you're on your own. People have no idea about this when they vaccinate themselves or their children.”

Why Were the Shots Mandated?
As you know by now, president Biden decided to mandate the COVID jab for most federal employees (but not all) and private companies with 100 employees or more. “We don't know why that is,” Nass says. It doesn't make sense, as large numbers of Americans have already recovered from COVID-19 and have durable, long-lasting immunity already.

As correctly noted by Nass, natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wears off within a few months. The shots “may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to be infected with COVID later,” Nass says.

For these reasons, there’s absolutely no good reason to vaccinate people who have recovered from the infection and several bad reasons. There’s evidence showing the shot can be more harmful for those with existing immunity.

“But for reasons best known to itself, the Biden administration feels so certain it needs to vaccinate everybody that it has used illegal means to tell employers they will lose federal contracts if they don't force their employees to be vaccinated immediately, and must fire them — if they're health care workers, for example, or government employees, or military — if they have not been vaccinated.

Obviously that is creating a great deal of chaos, particularly within the health care industry, particularly in my state, Maine, where these draconian rules have gone into effect and many fire department, police, EMTs, nurses and doctors can no longer work.

The one thing that was necessary to push mandates forward was for the government to be able to say it had a licensed product. Before the emergency use authorization was created in 2005, you had licensed drugs and you had experimental drugs and nothing else.

There was no gray area between them. Any use of a medication or vaccine that is not fully licensed is still experimental, despite the fact that a new category of drugs has been created with emergency use authorizations.

These are still experimental drugs, so under emergency use, you can't force people [to take them]. You have to offer them options and they have the right to refuse. Since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it.

Therefore, attorneys in the Biden administration knew they could not legally impose mandates under an EUA, and so they demanded that FDA provide a COVID vaccine full approval, aka, an unrestricted license. This was believed to enable them to impose mandates.

They must have put pressure on the FDA, and FDA gave them what they wanted, which was a license for the Pfizer vaccine called Comirnaty on August 23 [2021].”

Comirnaty Approval Includes Important Caveats
In the documents released August 23, 2021, by the FDA, there were some interesting caveats. They said the Comirnaty vaccine is essentially equivalent to the EUA vaccine and the two vaccines may be used interchangeably. However, they pointed out that the two are legally distinct. Curiously, FDA didn't specify what these legal distinctions are.

“I concluded that the legal distinctions were the fact that under EUA, there was essentially no manufacturer liability, but once the vaccine got licensed, the manufacturer would be subject to liability claims unless and until the vaccine was placed on the childhood schedule or recommended in pregnancy, in which case it would then fall ... under the NVICP,” Nass says.

“Right now, Comirnaty is still not in that injury compensation program, and it's licensed, so it no longer falls under the CICP. So, it is in fact subject to liability if you get injured with a bottle that says Comirnaty on it. Of course, if you’re Pfizer, what do you want to do?

You don't want to make that licensed product available until several months have gone by and Comirnaty has been put into the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. So, Pfizer and FDA have not made the licensed product available yet.

What has happened instead, in the military, is the FDA has made a secret deal with the military and said, certain emergency use lots can be considered equivalent to the licensed vaccine, and [told military medical staff] which QR codes — which lots can be used. [These specific lots] can then be given to soldiers as if they're licensed.

Subsequently, we're told that military clinics are actually putting Comirnaty labels onto bottles that are under EUA. Now, that probably can happen in the military, but only in the military, because there are likely to be memoranda of understanding within the military that we haven't seen yet that say soldiers cannot sue Pfizer for injuries ...

In the military, the government and Pfizer feel like they have set up a situation where nobody can sue, but in the civilian world, that has not happened, and so there is no Comirnaty available.

Yet, on the basis that FDA licensed this product, the federal government is still telling employers that they can mandate it and that they must fire employees that have not taken the vaccine, or they will lose government contracts. We're in a very interesting situation that is ripe for litigation, and Children's Health Defense, which is an organization I represent, is litigating some of this.

However, the litigation situation has been very difficult since the pandemic began. Cases that normally would've been easy wins are being thrown out by the courts, both in the U.S. and in Europe. Something strange has happened and the judges are looking for any way out, so they don't have to rule on the merits of these cases.”

The organization Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the federal government did it anyway. Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but Children’s Health Defense hasn’t given up and is still pursuing that case.

COVID Jab Is Authorized for 5- to 11-Year-Olds in the US
As mentioned, the FDA recently authorized the EUA COVID jab for children between the ages of 5 and 11, which is simply appalling, considering they are at virtually no risk from COVID-19. I’ve not seen a single recorded case in the entire world of anyone in that age group dying of COVID that didn't have a serious preexisting comorbidity, such as cancer.

If you have a healthy child, they are at no risk from the infection, so there’s only danger associated with this shot, which in this age group would be one-third the adult dose. Typically, when you’re giving a drug to a child, the dose is calculated based on the child’s weight. Here, they’re giving the same dose to a 5-year-old as an 11-year-old, despite there being a significant difference in weight. So, it’s pure guesswork.

Worse yet, the mRNA vaccines produce an unpredictable amount of spike protein, and even if they produce much too much, there is no way to turn off the process once you have been injected.

Despite clear safety signals, the FDA’s advisory committee authorized the Pfizer jab for 5- to 11-year-olds unanimously, 17-to-0 (with one abstaining vote). However, when you look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members1 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for children as young as 5, the unanimous “yes” vote becomes less of a mystery.

Abhorrent Conflicts of Interest
As reported by National File2 and The Defender,3 the membership of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) has had staggering conflicts of interest. Members have included:

A former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines

A paid Pfizer consultant

A recent Pfizer research grant recipient

A mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer

James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer vaccines

A chair of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program

An individual proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine

Several people who are already on the record supporting coronavirus vaccines for children, including Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton

In addition to that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is currently on Pfizer’s board of directors. As noted by Nass, two of the members, one permanent and one temporary, are also CDC career employees whose job it is to push vaccines at the CDC.

“If they voted against authorizing a vaccine, they would be out of a job,” Nass says. “They have no business on that committee ... It's a very unethical stew of advisory committee members ...

What happened is Pfizer delivered a large package of information to the FDA on October 6, 2021. FDA staff had to go through this large packet of information on the 5- to 11-year-olds and produce their own report, which was about 40 pages long, and create talks to give to the advisory committee, and they did all of this in 17 days.

There was apparently very little critical thought that went into their presentations. Before the meeting, Children’s Health Defense, and I was one of the authors, wrote to the committee and to FDA officials saying, ‘Look, there's all these reasons that don't make logical or medical sense for vaccinating kids in this age group, because they almost never get very ill or die, and the side effects of the vaccine are essentially unknown.

We know there are a lot of side effects, but the federal government has concealed from us the rate at which these side effects occur. But we know that the rate from myocarditis is very high, probably at least 1 in 5,000 young males ... which is a very serious side effect. It can lead, probably always leads, to some scarring. It can lead to sudden death, to heart failure.”

Trials in Young Children Were Insufficient
As explained by Nass, in the clinical trial, there were two groups of children. The first group was enrolled for two to three months, while the second group was enrolled for just 17 days after receiving the second dose. (Pfizer added the second group because FDA claimed there weren’t enough volunteers in the first group.)

These two groups comprised over 3,000 children who got the jab and 1,500 or 2,000 who got a placebo. None suffered serious side effects. This was then translated into the claim that the injection was safe. However, as noted by Nass:

“They didn't look at safety in all these kids. Even though FDA had said, ‘Add kids to your clinical trial,’ Pfizer created a ‘safety subset’ of one-tenth of the vaccinated subjects.

It was this small number of kids from whom they drew blood to show they had adequate levels of neutralizing antibodies, which was a surrogate for efficacy, because they didn't have enough cases of COVID in this abbreviated trial to show that the vaccine actually works in this age group.”

Even though the advisory committee acknowledged that the blood test done for efficacy had not been validated, and wasn't reliable evidence of effectiveness, they still decided that all children, regardless of health status, would benefit from the injection.

They also ignored the fact that at least half the children are already immune, and giving them the injection will provide no additional benefit in terms of immunity, while putting them at increased risk for serious side effects.

“Nobody said, ‘Look, the parents of healthy kids may be dying for a vaccine, but that's because we haven't told them the truth about the vaccine. We haven't told them their kids don't need it. We haven't told them it's going to potentially damage future immunity.

We haven't told them they're at higher risk of side effects than if they never had COVID. We're not allowing them to go get antibody tests to establish that they're already immune and therefore should be waved from being vaccinated.’

The committee members were aware of all this stuff, but in the end [they voted yes] ... apart from one very smart member of the committee who works for the National Institutes of Health. He abstained. He didn't have the guts to vote no, but he knew this was a bad idea.”

Children Are Being Injected Without Parental Consent
While all of that is bad enough, parents of young children now face the possibility of their children being injected against their will and without their knowledge. Nass comments:

“As I said, we don't know why the government wants everybody vaccinated, but there's probably a reason that goes beyond protecting us from COVID.

The government got the FDA to authorize the vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds on May 10 [2021], and subsequently that group, which is about 6 million kids, has been getting vaccinated across the country. That's under emergency use so, again, you can't sue.

But something kind of evil happened, which was many cities began vaccinating 12- to 15-year-olds in the absence of parental permission. So, a child could show up with their friends or a friend's mother at a vaccine center and get vaccinated with no one asking about their medical history, nobody calling the parents. No notation got entered into the child’s medical record that they were vaccinated.

Vaccinators were told to make their own assessment. If they thought this child could give consent, go ahead and vaccinate. Now, that is a gross violation of our laws, and yet it was happening in Boston, in Philadelphia, in Seattle, in San Francisco, and we have good documentation of it.

The government currently is planning for mobile vaccination clinics for kids and vaccinations in schools, and they may take this program of vaccinating without parental consent down to the 5- to 11-year-olds ...

In fact, we may see clinics popping up that don't require informed consent in the 5- to 11-year-old group. Let me just mention that the chief medical officer in Canada's British Columbia said they have brought laws that allow children of any age to consent for themselves. Think about that. A baby can consent for vaccinations for itself. It would be funny if it wasn’t so diabolical.”

All of this goes against the most basic concept of medical ethics, which is informed consent. No one has the right to perform a medical procedure on you without your consent, or the consent of a legal guardian. The government, again, without establishing any new laws, is simply bypassing the legal system.

Will Young Children Be at Risk for Myocarditis?
Based on her review of the scientific literature, Nass suspects younger children in the now COVID jab-approved, 5- to 11-year-old age group will be at exponentially higher risk of myocarditis and other side effects compared to the 12- to 15-year group, where we’ve already seen a documented increase.

“In the letter that Children’s Health Defense wrote to the advisory committee for the FDA, we created a graph based on the reporting rate of myocarditis versus age, and we showed there was an exponential curve.

Men aged 65 and up had a rate that was 1/100th the rate of boys aged 12 to 17. If that exponential curve keeps going up, the rate in the 5- to 11-year-olds could be even dramatically higher. In those young men, a 1 in 5,000 rate was reported to VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System]. That's not a real rate.

That just tells us how many people got diagnosed with myocarditis, and then went to the trouble of reporting it to the FDA. The FDA and CDC have a large number of other databases from which they can gather rates of illness.

VAERS is considered passive reporting. It is not considered fit for purpose to establish illness rates because we don't know how many people report. Do 1 in 10 report, 1 in 100, 1 in 50? Nobody knows.

However, again, because everything is crazy since the pandemic came in, the CDC has tried to pull the wool over our eyes and has claimed that the rate of anaphylaxis in the population from COVID vaccines is identical to their reporting rate to VAERS. We know that's not true.

On the CDC’s website, that's what they have. Elsewhere on the website, they say you can't take a VAERS rate and call it an actual rate of reactions, but they've done that [for anaphylaxis]. And they're trying to obfuscate the fact that they're not giving you real rates, and sort of pretending that the myocarditis rate is probably the VAERS reporting rate of myocarditis, although they're not saying so directly.”

Nass goes on to recount an example from the smallpox vaccine, which also caused myocarditis. A military study that just looked at cases sent to specialists found roughly 1 in 15,000 developed myocarditis. A military immunologist then dug deeper, and drew blood on soldiers before and after vaccination, and found a myocarditis rate of 1 in 220 after receiving the smallpox vaccine.

However, 1 soldier in 30 developed subclinical myocarditis where troponin rose from normal to more than two times the upper limits of normal. While asymptomatic, 1 in 30 had measurable inflammation of the heart. “Right now, in terms of what the rate is for COVID, nobody is looking, no federal agency wants to find out the real rate,” Nass says.

You Can’t Find Problems You Refuse to Look For
A simple study that measures troponin levels — a marker for heart inflammation and damage — before and after each dose, could easily determine what the real rate of myocarditis is, yet that is not being done.

“This is what we're dealing with,” Nass says. “All these databases, which is about a dozen different databases, that CDC and FDA said they could access to determine the rates of side effects after vaccination with COVID vaccines, they're either not being used or being used improperly,” Nass says.

“It was discovered that a new algorithm was being used to study the VAERS database that only came into use in January 2021, immediately after the vaccines were authorized, and the algorithm was developed such that you compare two vaccines to each other.

If the pattern of side effects was similar between the two vaccines — which is often the case because there's a limited number of general vaccine adverse reactions — even if one vaccine has a thousand times more side effects as the one it is being compared to, by using this flawed algorithm, if the pattern of reactions was the same, even though the rates were 1,000 times higher for one, the algorithm would fail to detect a problem.

That is the algorithm they're using to analyze VAERS [data]. They're also using bad methods ... to analyze the vaccine safety database, which encompasses 12 million Americans who enrolled in HMOs around the country. The CDC pays for access to their electronic medical records and their data.

Somehow when these databases have been looked at carefully, they're finding very low rates of myocarditis in boys, approximately equal to the VAERS reporting. It was said months ago, ‘We can't find a safety signal for myocarditis. We're not finding an anaphylaxis signal. we're not finding a Bell's palsy signal.’

The FDA’s and CDC’s algorithms couldn't pick up for most known side effects. So, there's something wrong with the analytic methods that are being used, but the agencies haven't told us precisely what they are. What we do know is that the rates of side effects that are being reported to VAERS are phenomenal.

They're orders of magnitude higher than for any previous vaccines used in the United States. An order of magnitude is 10-fold, so rates of reported adverse reactions are 10 to 100 times higher than what has been reported for any other vaccine. Reported deaths after COVID in the United States are 17,000+. It’s off the charts.

Other side effects reported after COVID vaccinations total over 800,000. Again, more deaths and more side effects than have ever been reported for every vaccine combined in use in the U.S. cumulatively over 30 years.”

Despite all this shocking data, our federal agencies look the other way, pretending as if nothing is happening, and no matter how many people approach them — with lawsuits, with public comments, reaching out to politicians — they refuse to address blatantly obvious concerns. This is clear evidence that they’re acting with intentional malice.

FDA has become Clown World, and what they do now is to perform a charade of all the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to perform ... You're the guinea pigs, but they're not collecting the data. Nobody should get these shots. ~ Dr. Meryl Nass
The FDA and CDC are supposed to protect the public. They're supposed to identify safety concerns. They're not supposed to act as marketing firms for drug companies, but that’s precisely what they've been converted to.

New Formulations Have Never Been Tested
Another truly egregious fact is that Pfizer has altered its formulation, allegedly to make it more stable, but this new formulation has never been included in any of the trials. Nass explains:

“During the October 26, 2021, VRBPAC [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee] meeting, Pfizer said, ‘Look, we want to give the vaccines in doctor's offices and we've found a way to stabilize the vaccine so we don't need those ultra-cold fridges anymore. We can put these vials in a doctor's office and, once defrosted, they can sit in a regular fridge 10 weeks and they'll be fine.’

Some committee members asked, ‘OK, what'd you do? How did you make this marvelous discovery?’ And they said, ‘We went from the phosphate buffered saline buffer to a Tris buffer, and we slightly changed some electrolytes.’ A committee member asked, ‘OK, how did that make it so much more stable?’ And everybody in the meeting from FDA and Pfizer looked at each other and said, ‘We don't know.’

An hour later, Pfizer had one of their chemists get on the line, but he couldn't explain how the change in buffer led to a huge increase in stability, either. Then, later in the meeting, one of the members of the committee asked, ‘Did you use this new formulation in the clinical trial?’

And Dr. Bill Gruber, the lead Pfizer representative, said, ‘No, we didn't.’ In other words, Pfizer plans, with FDA connivance, to use an entirely new vaccine formulation in children, after their clinical trials used the old formulation. This is grossly illegal. They've got a new formulation of vaccine. It wasn't tested in humans. And they're about to use it on 28 million American kids.”

It's nothing short of a dystopian nightmare. Completely surreal. You can't make this stuff up. Yet as shocking as all this is, earlier this year, Dr. Anthony Fauci projected that these COVID jabs would be available for everyone, from infants to the elderly. Now they’ve got the 5-year-olds, and there’s every reason to suspect they’ll go after newborns and infants next.

Whose Babies Will Be Offered Up as Sacrificial Lambs?
According to Nass, Pfizer and the FDA have struck a deal that will allow Pfizer to test on babies even younger than 6 months old, even if there’s no intention to inject infants that young. Those trials may begin as early as the end of January 2022.

“This arrangement between FDA and Pfizer will give Pfizer its extra six months of patent protection, whether or not these vaccines are intended to be used in those age groups. So, you can look at these trials as a way of almost sacrificing little children, because when you start a trial, you don't know what the dangers are going to be.

I could be wrong, but I doubt we're going to give these to newborn babies the way we give the hepatitis B vaccine on the date of birth, yet they will be tested in very young babies. The question is, whose babies get tested? In the past, sometimes the babies that got tested were foster children, wards of the state. Sometimes parents offer up their children. But there will be clinical trials.”

When will we get the data from those trials? It turns out that in the agreements reached between Pfizer and the FDA, some of those trials won't conclude until 2024, 2025 and 2027. The goal here is to vaccinate all Americans, children and adults, within the coming few months or a year, yet it’ll be five years before we actually know from clinical trials what the side effects may be.

We’re Living in Clown World
As noted by Nass, this is yet another crime. It may fulfill the letter of the law, but it doesn’t fulfill the meaning of the law. It makes no sense to run clinical trials that won’t be completed until five years after your mass vaccination program has been completed and the entire population is injected.

“It's just a joke to do that,” Nass says. “But FDA has become Clown World, and what they do now is to perform a charade of all the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to do, but they're only doing them in an abbreviated or peculiar manner so that they don't really collect the important data.

For example, the control group has been vaccinated two months into the Pfizer trials, which effectively obscures side effects that develop after two months. Blood is not tested for evidence of myocarditis or blood clots using simple tests (troponin and D-dimer levels).

For all the Americans out there who haven't spent 20 years examining the FDA procedures like I have, these FDA advisory committee meetings are it's designed to make you think a real regulatory process is going on, when it’s not. Instead we are all guinea pigs, but no one is collecting the data that would normally be required to authorize or approve a vaccine. Therefore, in my opinion, nobody should get these shots.“

To make matters even worse, it's actually illegal to grant EUAs for these vaccines, because there are drugs that can prevent the condition (COVID), as well as treat it. EUAs can only be granted if there are no existing approved, available alternatives to prevent or treat the infection.

The effective drugs most have already heard of are ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, but there are a number of other drugs that also have profound effects on COVID, Nass says, including TriCor and cyproheptadine (Periactin).

TriCor, or fenofibrate, emulsifies lipid nanoparticles and fatty conglomerations that contain viruses and inflammatory substances. The drug essentially allows your body to break down the viral and inflammatory debris better. As such, it might also help combat complications caused by the nanoliposomes in the COVID shot.

According to Nass, Pepcid at high doses of up to 80 milligrams three times a day is also useful for treatment. Dr. Robert Malone is starting a clinical trial using a combination of Pepcid and celecoxib (brand name Celebrex). Many are also recommending aspirin to prevent platelet activation and clotting.

I believe a far better alternative to aspirin is lumbrokinase, and/or serapeptase. Both are fibrinolytic enzymes that address blood clotting. You can develop sensitivity to them, so I recommend alternating the two on alternate days for about three months if you’ve had COVID.

You could rule out blood clotting by doing a D-dimer test. If your D-dimer is normal, you don’t need an anticlotting agent. If clotting is a concern, you could also use NAC in addition to these fibrinolytic enzymes. It too helps break up clots and prevent clot formation.

More Information
To learn more, be sure to peruse MerylNassMD.com and anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com. She typically posts something every day to her blogspot blog. In closing, Nass concludes:

“Remember, all the COVID jabs are authorized [under EUA], not licensed. They're all legally, technically, experimental. I know you can lose your job and all these terrible things can happen if you refuse the vaccine, but if you are injured by the shot, you won’t be able to sue later. You will be on your own.

Legally, they can't force you to accept the vaccine while it is in EUA status because of the Nuremberg code, because of existing U.S. law about informed consent, and because of the actual statute on emergency use authorization, which says you have the right to refuse. They can't force you to take these [shots].

I know they are forcing you, but legally they can't, and please keep that in mind. Hopefully these wrongs will be redressed. Mandates are being walked back in many jurisdictions.

As I've told people, demand to see the bottle that says Comirnaty, because legally, they can force the licensed product on you, but there isn't any right now. So, you have an out for the next few months, hopefully.

They're really dangerous vaccines. What you don't know will hurt you. Please protect your children. If there's any way, don't get vaccinated. The more people who say no, the more the government is already backing down. In many cities, the imposed dates by which you have to be vaccinated have been pushed back.

Now Biden's administration is saying, ‘Well, it's not going to be carved in stone. We're going to negotiate with people because they don't want to lose 30% or 40% of their staff.’ So, be strong, protect yourself and your children. Know you're doing the right thing.

We've got a criminal organization running things now. This is a worldwide program of some kind designed to control us. Once we all figure it out, we can win. There's many, many more of us than there are of them.”

Sources and References
1 FDA Members Office of Vaccine Research and Review Meeting Roster
2 National File October 26, 2021
3 The Defender November 1, 2021

[Matthew]

This might just be a UK thing, but possibly not. I had heard about this way to travel without being vaccinated. It's called 'in transit' I think. STOPCOMMONPASS have made a web page set of steps to help people travel abroad without vaccination. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1456996763676692482.html

Context:
https://twitter.com/org_scp/status/1478792479478587397
Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo
If you are “fully” vaccinated, you can travel and return to the UK without testing or isolation.

But if you’re unvaccinated, you need 2 private PCR tests £££ and 10 days isolation.

Bear in mind.. even if you HAVE covid a LFT suffices and you only have to isolate for 7 days Upside-down face

STOPCOMMONPASS @org_scp
Replying to @silkiecarlo
We recommend people use a landside transit exemption when re-entering #England. It's a Sched. 4 exemption under UK travel regs. No #vaccinepassports, Day 2/8 testing or isolation:

[gord]

My brother in law just had a heart attack and is in ICU. I don't think he's ever had heart issues, and I don't know how recently he got the vaccine, or which one. Family is now pushing again for me to get it (to potentially attend a funeral). I won't be coerced by anyone.

And now gone...:(

[Tintin]

An excellent summary published January 28th from an anonymous former cell biologist who studied at Cambridge.

There are a lot of tables and links here so I've refrained from embedding them all - the article link is here: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/28/vaids-negative-vaccine-effectiveness-equals-damaged-immune-system/

With that in mind, I'm providing an abridged sub-edited version here with the critical text.

________

VAIDS – Every 1% fall in Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness is the result of a 0.5-1% fall in your Immune System capability

Official data from around the world does not only show that the Covid-19 vaccines are ineffective, it shows that they have a negative effectiveness that gets worse by the week.

This doesn’t mean the vaccines are failing, it means they are damaging the immune system, and every 1% fall in Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness is the result of a 0.5%-1% fall in your immune system capability.

__________

By a concerned reader for the Daily Expose (https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/28/vaids-negative-vaccine-effectiveness-equals-damaged-immune-system/)

Vaccines program your cells to produce the 1273 Amino Acid Wuhan Alpha (HU1) spike protein and simulate a systemic infection. This trains your immune system to recognise and kill spike proteins as systemic infection causing pathogens.

The entire process takes around 14 days, the typical length of a viral infection. That is why the government recommends that vulnerable people remain isolated for 14 days post injection and that is why the government produces stats which only recognise injected people as being the singly or doubly vaccinated 14 days after the 1st or the 2nd jab.

So we know that the work of the vaccine is completed by day 14.

So they cannot possibly wane in effectiveness themselves after that.

They conduct a 14 day training course and then they are supposed to clear off. Therefore they do not and they cannot wane in efficiency in months 2/3/4/5/6 because they do not do anything in those months. Their work is finished in 14 days.

But the work of your immune system in never finished. So it is your immune system which is waning in months 2/3/4/5/6 not the vaccines. Your immune system is being redirected to fight spike proteins and therefore has less and less resources available to fight Covid. So a loss in apparent vaccine effectiveness is in fact a loss in immune system effectiveness.

There is a 1% drop in immune system capability per 1% drop in vaccine effectiveness (as measured by the case rate ratio between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed) if the vaccine had zero effectiveness upon injection (as is the case for 2 jabs and Omicron according to the University of Toronto study – https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565v1).

In this case the possible range for vaccine effectiveness is 0 to -100% i.e. 100% total. So a 100% drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a 100% drop in immune system capability. So each percentage drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a one percent drop in Immune effectiveness.

There is a 0.5% drop in immune system capability per 1% drop in vaccine effectiveness (as measured by the case rate ratio between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed) if the vaccine had 100% effectiveness upon injection (Pfizer claimed 95% effectiveness against Wuhan allpha).

In this case the possible range for vaccine effectiveness is +100% to -100% i.e. 200% total. So a 200% drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a 100% drop in immune system capability. So each percentage drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a half percent drop in Immune effectiveness.

All Covid vaccines drop in effectiveness persistently and inexorably until -99% (where case rates in the fully vaccinated are 100x greater than case rates in the unvaxxed – NSW in Australia has already reached 10x). Then they continue to approach 100% presumably, where case rates are hundreds and then thousands of times greater in the vaxxed than in the unvaxxed.

Therefore all Covid vaccines progressively damage, degrade and destroy your immune system resulting in more infections, longer recovery times from infection and finally in sepsis (no recovery from infection without massive medical intervention).

https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/image-336.png?w=739&ssl=1

Once the Covid vaccines start to show a negative efficiency (which they are all now showing against Omicron), they become Antivaccines rather than vaccines. So the vaccinated have become the antivaccinated. And those who continue to promote vaccines knowing that they have now become antivaccines, are themselves antivaxxers.

Vaccines cannot wane in efficiency. They are binary. They show your immune system the spike protein antigen and they simulate a systemic attack to convince your immune system to take that spike protein seriously. Then there is NOTHING more for a true vaccine to do.

They operate for 2-3 weeks, the normal length of a viral infection. Then they are supposed to leave your body. So they do not, they cannot, wane. They do not and cannot themselves drop in efficiency in the 2nd or 3rd or 4th or 5th month because they have nothing to do in those months.

A worker who has finished his employment contract with a company cannot then work less efficiently for that company. He is no longer employed by that company.

But genetic vaccines continue to produce spike proteins incessantly. These damage your immune system incessantly. It is your immune system therefore that wanes. In the UK they have damaged our immune systems so much that vaccines now have enormous negative efficiencies up to -60% in the latest UKHSA data for the end of 2021 in certain age groups (Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 1).

The trouble with the genetic vaccines that NOBODY talks about is that they do not stop producing spike proteins. They continue producing more and more of them.

I asked AstraZeneca for how long after vaccination would my cells produce spikes? They said we do not know we are still researching that. I do know because I did cell biology at Cambridge. Every vaccinated cell will continue producing spike proteins until it dies or is killed by your killer T cells.

So the results of the Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest are…
Les résultats du concours worldovision anti-vaccin sont donc…
Die Ergebnisse des Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest sind also…
Så resultaterne af Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest er…

https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/image-337.png?resize=768%2C176&ssl=1

Let us be perfectly clear here. The table above is more a measure of the corruption of the respective government stats agencies than it is a measure of antivaccine efficiency and immune system degradation in the respective countries.

The original German and Australian figures will be correct. The Canadian figures are very corrupt. The CDC and UK figures are corrupt. The Danish and Scottish figures are less corrupt.

https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/image-344.png?resize=768%2C618&ssl=1

Your immune system kills every vaccinated cell in your body

Vaccination informs your immune system that spike proteins are very dangerous antigens (by simulating a systemic infection coincident with the presentation of the spike protein antigen).

So it kills the spike proteins and kills every cell in your body that has been vaccinated because all of those cells are genetically reprogrammed by the vaccine to make spike proteins and your immune system identifies and recognises vaccinated cells as spike protein factories..

So your body goes into a perpetual civil war in which more and more of your immune resources are spent killing vaccinated cells. Pfizer contains 14.4 trillion 1273 Amino Acid spike protein mRNA copies and Moderna contains 48 trillion – see here. You only have between 6 and 36 trillion cells in your body (depending upon how you count them).

Some of these cells such as heart muscle cells and brain cells do not get replaced. If they become vaccinated, you will lose them indefinitely. Myocarditis is caused by Killer T cells removing vaccinated heart cells. This gets worse at the 2nd jab and worse still at the 3rd.

You may think that vaccines are safe but your immune system would beg to differ

Your trusty immune system kills every single vaccinated cell it can find. In deed it is the vaccine which trains it to kill them. It is this civil war which causes the vaccine efficiency to look like it is decreasing.

But it is not decreasing at all. Your immune system response is decreasing. You are developing VAIDS, Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

The law of inverse political results

Having studied the efficiency of politicians at fulfilling their election promises for 50 years, a family member of mine formulated with law of inverse political results. This law states that politicians always achieve in office the precise opposite of what they promise at elections.

His theory is that if one wants a true capitalist government, one should vote for Jeremy Corbyn. And if one wants a true communist dictatorship, one should vote for Boris Johnson. To be fair to both politicians, the law does not suggest that said result reversal is entirely the fault of the respective politician.

A lot of the reversal of their promises comes about due to the reactionary, indignant, incompetent and contrarian nature of the blob of the civil service. But it is a good ‘Yes Minister’ type rule of thumb.

So when a government recommends and even mandates a medical intervention, the result according to this law will be the precise opposite of what the politicians promise. And indeed that has turned out to be the case.

The politicians promised that vaccinations would end the pandemic. But vaccinations have not ended the pandemic. They have prolonged the pandemic, by degrading the immune systems of the vaccinated, who are now condemned to be reinfected by previously trivial viruses, indefinitely.

They promised us vaccines. They gave us antivaccines. That is the law of inverse political results.

[onawah]

First State to Reject CDC Vaccine Recommendations
Roundtable Discussion on COVID Treatments and Mandates
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
March 18, 2022
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/18/covid-roundtable-discussion.aspx?ui=8d3c7e22a03f5300d2e3338a0f080d2da3add85bca35e09236649153e4675f72&sd=20110604&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20220318&mid=DM1136010&rid=1436827960

"And not only that, they want to hold the decision makers responsible for their harmful public health decisions regarding COVID-19.
From the very beginning of the pandemic, government officials made poor choices, adopting policies that appeared to be tailor-made to harm certain groups.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns and more
March 8, 2022, the Florida Department of Health updated its guidance, formally recommending against COVID vaccination for healthy children, 5 to 17. Florida is the first state to go against CDC vaccine recommendations
Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo stressed that, as we move forward, we must insist on holding decision makers accountable for their harmful public health decisions.
“Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo said
According to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups.
Children are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID, yet children have been forced to bear the burden of disease prevention.
“Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children,” he said
According to Dr. Sunetra Gupta, what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.”
Doubt was cast on things that were certain, while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about.
Decision makers chose to do the very things we knew, for certain, would cause harm. They inverted the precautionary principle to minimize harm, and chose to maximize harm instead

March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion1 about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns, and how to end the COVID theatre once and for all. Panelists included physicians, scientists and academics from around the U.S., including:

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, a former National Institutes of Health-funded researcher

Dr. Robert Malone, a molecular virologist, bioethicist, vaccine researcher and co-developer of the mRNA vaccine platform

Dr. Tracy Hoeg, Ph.D., an epidemiologist

Dr. Jill Ackerman, a family physician

Dr. Christopher D’Adamo, Ph.D., an epidemiologist and integrative medicine specialist

Dr. Shveta Raju, an internist

Dr. Harvey Risch, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology trained in mathematical modeling of infectious diseases

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Ph.D., professor of health policy at Stanford, research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for focused protection of the most vulnerable2

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., former professor of medicine at Harvard University, now senior scientific director of the Brownstone Institute, a biostatistician and epidemiologist with expertise in vaccine safety evaluation, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, a rural emergency physician and clinical scientist, specializing in harm-benefit analysis

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Ph.D., Oxford University professor, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development and mathematical modeling of infectious disease, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration

We Must Hold Decision Makers to Account
As noted by Ladapo, one of the things we must remember and remain intent upon as we move forward is to hold people accountable for their public health decisions. Two years after the “two weeks to slow the spread,” we have ample evidence proving the decision makers “didn’t know what they were talking about,” Ladapo says.

Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit. ~ Joseph Ladapo, Florida Surgeon General
They abused their power, they manipulated data, they lied, and they now want us all to forget what they said and did. We cannot let them get away with it. Many errors were made, and those responsible must be held to account.

“Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo says. “We cannot let them forget. We have to hold them accountable. We have to let the country, the world, know what the truth is — because it’s the right thing to do, and because it can happen again if we don’t.”

Thousand-Fold Difference in Risk Was Ignored
Bhattacharya was one of the first to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 in 2020, and he found that by April, the infection was already too prevalent for lockdowns to have any possibility of stopping the spread.

He points out that one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups. Children and teens are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID. Overall, the risk of COVID is primarily relegated to the very old and those with multiple comorbidities.

Bhattacharya has called the COVID-19 lockdowns the “biggest public health mistake ever made,”3 stressing that the harms caused have been “absolutely catastrophically devastating,” especially for children and the working class, worldwide.4

In some areas of the world, children have not been in school for two years, and the ramifications of that will likely reverberate for decades. Public health has also been negatively impacted by lockdowns and other measures — measures which Bhattacharya states were based in fear, not fact.

Stunning Denials of Science
Kulldorff, in his opening remarks, points out what he believes is one of the most stunning parts of this pandemic, and that is the denial of the basic science of natural immunity. Even doctors and hospitals that “should know better have demanded vaccine mandates for people who have already had COVID,” he says.

Perhaps even worse, hospitals have fired staff who have had COVID and have natural immunity, simply because they did not want to get the experimental jab. Those with natural immunity are not just less likely to get COVID again, they’re also far less likely to spread it to others. This makes them among the most valuable staff members a hospital can have, yet they were routinely discarded.

“That goes against basic principles of public health,” Kulldorff says. “And to have a director of the CDC who questions natural immunity, which we have now, is sort of like having a director of NASA who questions whether the earth is flat or round. It’s just mindboggling that we’ve come into a situation like that.”

Fraiman, whose clinical research expertise includes risk-benefit analysis, also expresses disbelief and frustration over the scientific censorship we’ve seen in the last two years. He points out that many of his colleagues are simply too afraid of getting fired to speak the truth.

DeSantis, similarly, highlights how incredibly difficult it has been to publish and find research that contradicted the official narrative, and even when available, the mainstream media would refuse to acknowledge it, whereas they would endlessly publicize speculation and statements of opinion that had no basis in fact or science, but supported — however flimsily — the official narrative.

I would add that so-called fact checkers have even gone so far as to “fact check” scientific peer-reviewed publications,5,6,7 labeling them as “misinformation” or outright “false,” resulting in their being censored on social media!

That’s an astounding development. It does not bode well for science when noncredentialed individuals with zero experience in the topic at hand are given the authority to decide the “truthfulness” or accuracy of scientists’ work.

The Inversion of the Precautionary Principle
Gupta, who has some 30 years of expertise in mathematical modeling of infectious disease, points out that what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.” In short, doubt was cast on things that were rather certain — so-called “unknowns were not unknown,” Gupta says — while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about.

“The powers that be told us the measures and restrictions would work, but we didn’t know they would work,” she says. Moreover, we didn’t know what their purpose actually was. “It was a rather incoherent set of goals,” she says. One thing we knew for certain was that lockdowns and other restrictions “would have enormous cost,” she says.

“That was the one thing we were certain about, yet that’s what we went ahead and did. We inverted the precautionary principle of trying to minimize harm, by doing the one thing we knew would cause harm.”

I would add that the scale of that harm was never calculated or addressed at any point along the way. It’s as though it didn’t matter how great the harm was, as long as there was the appearance that we were doing everything in our power to prevent COVID.

Plausibility Versus Science
Risch brings up a similar point, saying we’ve seen a lot of misdirection. What’s been conveyed to the public have been things that are plausible, but not scientific. “There’s a big difference between things that seem plausible and things that are scientific,” he says.

For example, lockdowns are a plausible countermeasure, but they’re not based in science. In fact, all the science we have, show them to be harmful, with little or no benefit whatsoever. “The same has been true for medications,” Rish says.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration put out warnings saying that hydroxychloroquine should not be used in outpatients, even though they had no data on outpatient use of the drug. They only had data on in-hospital use, and the two situations are not comparable.

Early COVID symptoms are completely different from symptoms of later-stage, severe infection and the two stages require completely different treatments. Hydroxychloroquine only works well when used very early. It’s not useful in the later stages, and frontline doctors were well aware of this.

No Justification for Mandating Vaccines for Children
Malone — speaking on behalf of the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists,8 which currently has some 17,000 members — stressed that, in terms of COVID policies, the Alliance has “made a series of very clear, unambiguous statements.”

“There is no justification for mandating vaccines for children. Full stop,” he says. “We’re of the strong opinion that if there is risk there must be choice. This is fundamental bioethics 101.”

As noted in the second Physicians Declaration9 by dated October 29, 2021, children’s clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is negligible and long term safety of the shots cannot be determined prior to the enactment of mandatory vaccination policies. Not only are children at high risk for severe adverse events, but having healthy, unvaccinated children in the population is crucial to achieving herd immunity. Malone continues:

“No. 2, as far as we’re concerned, there is no medical emergency now, and there is therefore no justification for the declaration of medical emergency and the suspension of rights ...”

The Alliance also condemns “the hunting of physicians and the restriction of physicians’ ability to prescribe and treat with early treatment.” With regard to vaccines, Malone also highlights the fact that while a Pfizer/BioNTech COVID injection has been approved by the FDA, that product is not available.

So, there is NO FDA approved COVID “vaccine” on the market in the U.S. The only products available in the U.S., for children and adults alike, are emergency use authorization (EUA) products, for which liability is waived.

Now, in order for the COVID injections to qualify for EUA, there could not be any other treatments available, which appears to have been the driving factor behind the suppression of early treatment with repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

Mask Mandates Have Not Had Any Benefit
Speaking to the issue of mask mandates, Hoeg has published several studies, looking at the effects of universal mask wearing. One of them assessed compliance and outcomes in the Wisconsin school system. On average, 92% of children complied with the mask wearing, and only seven students out of 7,000 caught COVID during the 2021 school year.

This was used by media to proclaim that masks work. The problem is, there was no control group, and the low infection rate could have been due to anything. Hoeg points out we have studies from Scandinavia, where masks were not worn, and they too had extremely low infection rates among children.

Again and again, we’ve seen that children just aren’t susceptible to COVID, especially not severe infection. So, low incidence really says nothing about the effectiveness of masks.

DeSantis also notes that neighboring schools — one that had a mask mandate and another that did not — had no discernible difference in infection rates, which he believes is rather compelling evidence that mask mandates have no benefit. What’s more, of the two largest randomized controlled trials, both showed that masks do not prevent the spread of infection.

According to Hoeg, we’ve inverted the precautionary principle with respect to mask wearing as well. Without any high-quality evidence of benefit, we’ve chosen to mask children even though we know there are harms. They interfere with communication, impede learning, hinder breathing, promote bacterial infections and more.

The Collateral Damage Has Been Immense
As noted by Fraiman, any time you consider a public health measure, you have to conduct a thorough risk-benefit analysis. Who may benefit and to what degree? What are the harms, who will be harmed the most, what’s the extent of the collateral damage? Do the benefits outweigh all of the risks?

In the case of school closures, “the collateral damage has been immense,” Fraiman says. Physical and mental health has been impacted. According to Fraiman, there’s been a doubling of obesity and diabetes, for example, during the pandemic. There’s been a dramatic increase in anxiety, depression and stress.

Recent statistics show a shocking spike in fentanyl overdose deaths among high school-aged adolescents in the U.S. during 2020 and 2021. The following graph, from a December 24, 2021, preprint article10 posted on medRxiv and tweeted11 out by Dr. John B., a scientist, illustrates the situation better than words.

media.mercola.com/ImageServer/public/2022/March/drug-overdose-deaths.jpg

According to the authors:12

“Adolescent overdose mortality saw a sharp increase between 2019 and 2020, from 2.35 per 100,000 to 4.58 per 100,000, representing a 94.3% increase, the largest percent increase of any 5-year age group ...

Trends were driven by fatalities involving IMFs [illicitly-manufactured-fentanyls], which nearly tripled from 2019 to 2020, and represented 76.6% of adolescent overdose deaths in 2021 ... Our results should also be understood in the context of rising rates of adolescent mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

“I think it’s quite clear that the collateral damage outweighed any benefit that was there,” Fraiman says. “So, I think we need to take a more systems-level approach before embarking on this kind of policy the next time.”

Was Harming Children Intentional?
Bhattacharya adds, “Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children.” Lower-income children were disproportionally harmed by lockdowns and school closures. “The effect on these kids has been catastrophic,” he says.

He cites a study that calculated that, as a result of the school closures during the spring of 2020, children in the U.S. will lose 5.5 million life years. Lost learning literally ripples through the child’s entire lifetime. They lead less healthy and shorter lives and are more likely to be steeped in poverty.

In some areas of the world, schools have been closed for nearly two years. As noted by Bhattacharya, we’ve “robbed an entire generation of their birthright.” Mask mandates have made the impact on children even worse.

He points out that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the only public health agency in the world that still recommends masking toddlers, “with literally not a single study showing it has any consequence on the spread of the disease.”

“The only reason they continue to mask [toddlers] is because [the toddlers] are powerless,” he says. “We’ve adopted this idea that children are the central problem; children are the ones who should bear all the burden of infection control.

In fact, that’s not true. It has revealed the values we have as a society, and it’s not a pretty picture. None of this has actually worked to protect the vulnerable. Still, 80% of the deaths are in people over 65. What have these restrictions on children bought? Not very much, if at all. And it’s caused tremendous harm that we’re going to have to address for years to come.”

Florida Recommends Against COVID Shots for Healthy Children
In late February 2022, Ladapo and DeSantis also updated the state’s policy on masks, formally discouraging mask wearing.13 Toward the end of the roundtable, Ladapo announced the Florida Department of Health would also formally recommend against COVID shots for healthy children, aged 5 to 17,14 as they “may not benefit from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccines.”

During the roundtable, risks such as myocarditis were also discussed. Florida is the first state to go against the CDC’s vaccine recommendations. In a statement published with the new guideline, March 8, 2022,15 Ladapo said:

“Based on currently available data, the risks of administering COVID-19 vaccination among healthy children may outweigh the benefits. These decisions should be made on an individual basis, and never mandated.” "

- Sources and References
1 Epoch Times March 3, 2022 (Archived)
2 Great Barrington Declaration
3 Newsweek March 8, 2021
4 Rumble, Ron DeSantis March 7, 2022, 32:00
5 Reclaim the Net December 17, 2021
6 Medscape December 20, 2021
7 ZeroHedge December 20, 2021
8 Physicians Declaration by the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists
9 Physicians Declaration October 29, 2021
10, 12 medRxiv December 24, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.23.21268284
11 Twitter Dr. John B December 25, 2021
13 AP News February 24, 2022
14 NBC News March 7, 2022, Updated March 8, 2022
15 Florida Health March 8, 2022

vu3iqj/?pub=4

[onawah]

CHD Wins Federal District Court Injunction On DC’s Minor Consent for Vaccinations Act
3/21/22
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/childrens-health-defense-wins-federal-district-court-injunction-on-district-of-columbias-minor-consent-for-vaccinations-act/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=49e2f69e-907d-4eb8-9766-218cbdf28fa9

"Press Release

For Immediate Release

Washington, DC – On March 18, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting a preliminary injunction to prohibit the mayor of the District of Columbia, the D.C. Department of Health and D.C. public schools from enforcing the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Act of 2020 until further order of the court.

“This is a major legal victory for children, parental rights, and informed consent,” said Rolf Hazlehurst, senior staff attorney for Children’s Health Defense (CHD) who argued the case. “Government overreach such as this has dire implications for children’s health and the constitutional rights of citizens.”

The D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Act of 2020, allows children eleven years of age and older to consent to vaccinations without their parents’ knowledge or consent. The law specifically targets children whose parents have religious exemptions for their children. The D.C. Act contains several provisions designed to deceive parents and hide the fact that their children have been vaccinated against their parental judgment, authority or religious convictions.

The court order states that the parents “have shown they are likely to succeed on the merits because the District’s law requires providers to hide children’s vaccination status from parents who invoke their religious exemption rights…”

The D.C. Minor Consent Act requires health care providers to falsify records by leaving the child’s school vaccination records “blank.” The doctors may bill the parents’ insurance companies for the vaccines administered to the children against the parents’ written directive. However, to deceive the parents, insurance companies may not send the parents an Explanation of Benefits (EOB).

CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020 unconstitutional. Plaintiffs, (Booth, et al.) are four parents of minor children who attend public school in Washington, D.C. Oral arguments were heard on March 3, 2022.

In the opinion issued on Friday, March 18, the court found the parents likely to succeed on the merits in their arguments that the D.C. Act is unconstitutional for two reasons. First, the D.C. Act is preempted by federal law because it directly contradicts the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The D.C. Act also violates the right to free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hazlehurst argued that the District has created a “pressure-cooker environment, enticing and psychologically manipulating [minor children] to defy their parents and take vaccinations against their parents’ will.”

The Plaintiffs overcame a high legal hurdle that “threatened injury must be certainly impending” as established by the U.S. Supreme Court precedent Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l., in part by the use of a drawing entitled “Peer Pressure,” drawn by one of the plaintiff’s children. The drawing depicts the dilemma children face at school when they do not want to get the COVID vaccine or have been advised by their parents not to take the shot.

“This preliminary injunction is part of ongoing litigation in an extremely important national precedent-setting case,” said Hazlehurst. “The rights of parents to decide what is best for their children’s health is at stake. Government can’t be allowed to make such decisions for minor children.”

Two similar but separate lawsuits, Booth (argued by CHD/Parental Rights Foundation) and Mazer (supported by Informed Consent Action Network), were filed against the D.C. Minor Consent Act. In both Booth and Mazer, the court ruled the plaintiffs have “standing” based on preemption because the D.C. Minor Consent Act conflicts with Congress’ National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. In CHD’s Booth case, the court made the additional finding that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits that the D.C. Minor Consent Act violates the free exercise of religion clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden stated, “Removing the law would revert the District to the standard age of consent of 18.” Although the case is not yet final, the preliminary injunction reverts D.C. to the standard age of consent of 18.

CHD Links:

a) 1 of 38-page document- PI Memo Opinion DC Minor Case:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/PI-memo-opinion-DC-minor-case.pdf

b) 1 of 2-page document- Booth Preliminary Injunction Order:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Booth-Preliminary-Injunction-Order.pdf

c) 1 of 88-page document- #31 Amended Complaint:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/31-AMENDED-COMPLAINT-against-All-Defendants-filed-by-SHANITA-WILLIAMS-SHAMEKA-WILLIAMS-VICTOR-M.-BOOTH-JANE-HELLEWELL.-AttachmentsHazlehurst-Rolf.pdf

d) 1 of 131-page document- #31 Appendix:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/31-1-Appendix.pdf

e) DC Plaintiff Drawing (Exhibit 11 & timestamp included):
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Exhibit-11-DC-plaintiff-drawing-.png "

[onawah]

ACT NOW: Tell the FDA to say NO to Pfizer jabs for babies and toddlers
Stand for Health Freedom
6/10/22
Action Alert!! Take action here:
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/no-jabs/

"Our Stand: At-A-Glance
FDA’s VRBPAC will meet June 15, 2022, to discuss expanding the EUA for Pfizer’s COVID jab to children from 6 months up to 5 years old.
This meeting was first scheduled for February, but after a huge public outcry the meeting was postponed to collect more data. As of June 3, 2022, this meeting has not yet been announced in the Federal Register (as the other June 2022 meetings have been) but comments are open.
This authorization would make approximately 18 million more children eligible for an experimental jab.
In December 2021, Pfizer announced the two-dose series wasn’t successful and did not provide immunity in 2–5-year-olds. Our youngest children will have to get more.
This age group is at minimal risk for catching or passing on COVID. If a child gets infected, they are far less likely to have serious outcomes.
According to data published by the CDC, 99.99815% of children who contract COVID-19 survive.
Most COVID cases are spread from adult to children and our children are not a threat to the older population.
This is not an FDA-approved shot; this would be an expansion of the experimental Emergency Use Authorization.
There are no long-term safety studies for this age group, or any age group, for the mRNA COVID shots because the placebo group was “unblinded” and allowed to get the jab.
If the FDA expands the Pfizer EUA to children as young as 5, systems are already in place to distribute the jab to our most vulnerable and schools will increase COVID jab mandates for our children. The ultimate goal for the White House is to expand the vaccine authorization to all children and get the jab on the ACIP Vaccine Schedule.
You can help stop this. You must tell our government what you want for your children. You can make a public comment that will go on record for the FDA to consider as it decides on Emergency Use Authorization for COVID vaccines for children ages 6 months – 4 years.
Comments received on or before June 7, 2022, will be provided to the committee. However, if you miss that window, you can still comment! The docket will remain open until the meeting, become part of our nation’s public record, and be taken into consideration by the FDA.
Sample Topics for Comments:

Ask the FDA to do their job and require adequate data.
Tell the FDA they must pay attention to the safety signal from VAERS and make decisions based on extreme caution.
The FDA must make decisions independent of what parents want for their children.
Ask questions that the FDA should be asking
Have they examined new evidence that the spike protein circulates through the body?
Do they know the rates of transmission from children to adults?
What is the effect of the COVID shot on puberty and fertility?
Have you been reading the documents Pfizer is releasing under court order?
Where is your evaluation of natural immunity in this decision?"

[mizo]

Will we get a choice?

49080