View Full Version : Barack Obama 2011
Pages :
[
1]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
jackovesk
7th January 2011, 12:28
UFC Fighter Jacob Volkmann Calls Out President Barack Obama, Gets A Visit From the Secret Service
UFC lightweight Jacob Volkmann, following his UFC 125 win over Antonio McKee, declared that he wanted to fight President Barack Obama for his next fight.
His words got him a visit from the Secret Service on Tuesday.
Volkmann, who is based out of Minnesota, told MMAFighting.com after his win over McKee that he wanted to face Obama because he disagreed with many of his policies.
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/mmaweekly/cf/fullj.e7312c3af4f8402737619cab1e42b345/0.jpeg?&
After defeating McKee, Volkmann was asked who he would like to fight next. Volkmann first requested Clay Guida, then said “Actually, Obama. He’s not too bright … Someone needs to knock some sense into that idiot. I just don’t like what Barack is doing.”
That comment got the government’s attention, as just days later, the Secret Service came to chat with the fighter.
“It happened on Tuesday, I was coaching youth practice, and then two guys came up and one of the other coaches that was helping me out, they said there was a cop and another guy out there waiting for me,” Volkmann told MMAWeekly.com. “I went out there and the guy introduced himself and said he was from the Secret Service and he wanted to ask me some questions about UFC 125 and my quote. He said there were people calling in to D.C. telling them that somebody, me, was threatening the President.”
The Secret Service showed up both at his residence and during a youth wrestling camp he coaches.
The interview is a formality, as the Secret Service investigates all potential threats made against the President, but Wednesday should be the close of the matter for Volkmann.
“This guy had the whole interview on a piece of paper and it had my picture and everything,” said Volkmann. “He was like ‘is this what you said?’ and I said, ‘yes it is.’ He’s like ‘I want to let you know I’m a little embarrassed for coming here and doing this because obviously nothing happened.’ He actually apologized for coming, but he had to come. He wanted to make sure I wasn’t going to D.C to hurt the President.
“The thing is, I got home and I checked my e-mail and I had about 20 e-mails and one of them, one of ladies had actually contacted the FBI and the Secret Service, and she was telling me that she was going to do it.”
The person who contacted Volkmann, according to the fighter, was a member of the election committee that worked for President Obama’s campaign.
Volkmann, who is also a chiropractor, wanted to clarify the statements he made in the original interview as well, because he says that was the reason most people seemed upset with him in the first place.
Volkmann, a chiropractor, says that he was trying to make a point about the health-care law, with which he disagrees. “People were misunderstanding the point of view I was going for with the health care plan. That’s why they were getting so upset. I’m thinking about the provider, I’m a chiropractor, so I’m thinking about my point of view, not everyone getting insurance. They don’t have to worry about getting denied, which is good I guess, just not good for health care providers,” said Volkmann.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news;_ylt=AkPS94eW5I.6m1uc2HBwXPFzfNdF?slug=mmaweekly-b0eb628c4e352ae5a67151dca2a17281
Humble Janitor
7th January 2011, 12:31
Hey, you make statements like that and you draw attention to yourself.
Why would anyone be surprised?
Left or right, they're all one and the same. Voting back in the same morons that helped guide us into this economic recession is just effing retarded and it shows the ignorance of the unenlightened masses.
kinsuemei2
7th January 2011, 13:33
Well my good friend Andrei Arlovski is going to be on the UTE show with myself and Jerry in March, he is going to talk about disclosure and life in Belarus and the levels of disclosure they have, yet also the intense level of oppression!
irishspirit
10th January 2011, 17:12
STANFORD, Calif. - President Obama is planning to hand the U.S. Commerce Department authority over a forthcoming cybersecurity effort to create an Internet ID for Americans, a White House official said here today.
It's "the absolute perfect spot in the U.S. government" to centralize efforts toward creating an "identity ecosystem" for the Internet, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt said.
That news, first reported by CNET, effectively pushes the department to the forefront of the issue, beating out other potential candidates including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. The move also is likely to please privacy and civil liberties groups that have raised concerns in the past over the dual roles of police and intelligence agencies.
The announcement came at an event today at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, where U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke and Schmidt spoke.
The Obama administration is currently drafting what it's calling the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, which Locke said will be released by the president in the next few months. (An early version was publicly released last summer.)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20027837-501465.html
irishspirit
13th January 2011, 12:55
From the moment Barrack Hussein Obama announced he was a candidate for the office of the President, his credentials have been under constant and considerable scrutiny by the finest Constitutional legal minds in our Country.
As President, in each of the legal challenges presented to the Supreme Court, the legal question presented is not what the Honorable Court preferred to hear or the case of the Plaintiff was not proper and deemed not to have “standing” or “merit”. As always, the Court was positioning to hear the correct positions and arguments, so the Court could opine and rest the matter forever. The longer the proper legal challenges took to develop, the more difficult it would be to unwrap all of the damage that Obama, and his special interest groups, would bestow on the American people and the international community (i.e. Obama's totally ignorant comment from the White House podium declaring the French are America's closest ally. This ignorant statement insults Great Britain and the rest of our most important allies and relationships).
The continual thread of the legal arguments is relative to Obama's required constitutional credentials. Specifically, if he meets the eligibility requirements to be the President of the United States of America as defined in the Constitution. Apparently, Obama's political tricksters, the special interests groups, the Chicago and the D.C. Beltway groups, which tilt their heads to the Obama faction, thought they could hijack America and out fox all of the Americans that hold the Constitution close to their heart. The Supreme Court heard each case brought before it, rendered an opinion and moved on to the next case. All of the previous cases have been denied for lack of 'Standing' or being 'Frivolous'.
As we stated in our last report, about 18 months ago at a college public speaking engagement, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was confronted by Dr. Orly Taitz with a suitcase of 350,000 confirmed signatures from World Net Daily and other sources. Dr. Taitz asked the Supreme Court to hear the complaints about Obama's required credentials including his status as a natural born citizen of the United States of America since he was not properly vetted for the Presidency due to the wrangling of Obama's special interest friends. Chief Justice Roberts promised Dr. Taitz publicly he would review the information. It appears that Roberts kept his promise as the matter was heard before the Supreme Court Justices on Friday, January 7th, 2011.
The outcome of this single case has been in the specter of legal scholars for many months as the target issue lies within the confines of the Article Two, Section One of the Constitution of the United States of America, as quoted below:
“Qualifications. The President must be a 'natural born citizen' of the United States,
at least 35 years old … “
If we break this down to its simplest common denominator and confine the argument to the true meaning of the Founding Fathers, Obama's mother, upon the conception Barrack Hussein Obama, was married to a verified Kenyan citizen, meaning he does not have the blood of two (2) verifiable citizens of the United States of America. Not only do we have the records but so do all of the National Security agencies charged with protecting American interests by the letter of the law. As of this date, the issue of Obama's citizenship status has become a National Security matter due to the wrangling of a group of people attempting to keep their candidate in office at all costs. For the record, and to this date, the American public and the Supreme Court have yet to receive the answers required to this question and Obama has yet to provide his long-form birth certificate and answer other Interrogatories.
In the Supreme Court, the test for Obama, his cronies and this Administration, is for Obama to prove that he is a Natural born Citizen. Obama can't do that as he has a Certified Birth Certificate in Kenya and 'Certificate of Live Birth' from the State of Hawaii. Herein lays the quandary for Obama, his cronies and the Court. Obama does not have the ability to prove and cannot provide a certified document providing for a true birth certificate for any of the American states. The only record of his birth is in Kenya.
From extremely high and very credible sources within the Judicial system, it has been reported that Obama and his legal team lost their arguments to have this case dismissed. The Court heard the applicable arguments from each side and held, in short form; the Obama did not meet the residency requirements as set forth in the Constitutional of the United States of America. A preliminary vote in favor of the Plaintiff was taken, with Associate Justice Elena Kagan not voting due to her previous political relationship and involvement with Obama's birth certification issues.
The Supreme Court is holding on to the decision and will not publish its decision for the sake of the American political process. What does this mean and why would they choose this path?
Notwithstanding the difficulty before the Judicial system as to what to do with an unlawfully sitting President, the real problem comes after the fact. This President has been sitting in the office illegally for two (2) years while propagating conjecture about American life and liberty, pushing his agenda, signing bills into law, issuing Executive Orders and trying to act as a real President. It is for this reason that all of the American Security agencies consider this single item a National Security matter with the single question: How do you control an out of control person acting as President?
Although the Court has not recorded or published their finding, there is already disinformation being propagated that the Court ruled in favor of Obama. This is not true.
http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/
pyrangello
13th January 2011, 13:29
Yep, who would have thunk it! I heard that the Obama administration has spent 1.5 million keeping his birth certificate info under wraps along with all of his college records as well. Transparency???
witchy1
17th January 2011, 13:14
A bit sensationalist but perhaps worthy of consideration for this year:
A grim report prepared by France’s General Directorate for External Security (DGSE (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale_de_la_s%C3%A9curit%C3%A9_ext%C3%A9rieure)) obtained by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Service_%28Russia%29)) states that president (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/president/)’s Obama and Sarkozy have “agreed in principal” to create a joint US-European military force to deal exclusively with a Global uprising expected this spring as our World runs out of food.
According to this report, Sarkozy, as head of the G-20 group of developed Nations, called for and received an emergency meeting with Obama this past Monday (http://www.france24.com/en/20110109-france-usa-sarkozy-washington-food-prices-currency-barack-obama) at the White House (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/white-house/) wherein he warned his American counterpart that the shock rise in food prices occurring due to an unprecedented series of disasters (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/disasters/) was threatening the stability of the entire World and could lead to the outbreak of Total Global War (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/global-war/).
Just last week French Prime Minister Francois Fillon underlined (http://www.france24.com/en/20110109-france-usa-sarkozy-washington-food-prices-currency-barack-obama) that one of France’s top G-20 priorities was to find a collective response to “excessive volatility” (http://www.france24.com/en/20110109-france-usa-sarkozy-washington-food-prices-currency-barack-obama) in food prices now occurring, a statement joined by Philippe Chalmin, a top economic adviser to the French government, who warned (http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-01-07/world-risks-food-riots-as-grains-climb-economist-chalmin-says.html) the World may face social unrest including food riots (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/food-riots/) in April as grain prices increase to unprecedented highs.
The fears of the French government over growing Global instability was realized this past week after food riots (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/food-riots/) erupted in Algeria (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70825R20110109) and Tunisia (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/159370.html) and left over 50 dead. So dire has the situation become in Tunisia that their government this morning rushed in massive amounts of troops and tanks (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/159931.html) to their capital city Tunis and instituted a Nationwide curfew in an order to quell the growing violence (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/violence/).
The United Nations (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/united-nations/), also, warned this past Friday (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i405JBuL3uapmYHvtR97O_GnY2Nw?docId=CNG.dfd1843a9cc600850b4d12dd7048131d.581) that millions of people are now at risk after food prices hit their highest level ever as Global wheat stocks fell to 175.2 million tons from 196.7 million tons a year ago; Global corn stocks are said may be 127.3 million tons at the end of this season, compared with last month’s USDA outlook for 130 million tons; and Global soybean inventories will drop to 58.78 million tons at the end of this season, from 60.4 million tons a year earlier. (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-10/corn-advances-on-concern-dry-argentine-weather-to-curb-harvest.html)
Robert Zoellick, president (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/president/) of the World Bank (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/world-bank/), further warned this past week that rising food prices are “a threat to global growth and social stability” (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/geoffrey-lean/8247029/One-poor-harvest-away-from-chaos.html) as our World, for the first time in living memory, has been warned is just “one poor harvest away from chaos” (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/geoffrey-lean/8247029/One-poor-harvest-away-from-chaos.html).
Important to note about how dire the Global food situation has become is to understand the disasters (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/disasters/) that have befallen our World’s top wheat growing Nations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat) this past year, and who in descending order are: China, India, United States, Russia, France, Canada, Germany, Ukraine, Australia (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/australia/) and Pakistan.
From China’s disaster: 2010 China drought and dust storms were a series of severe droughts during the spring of 2010 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_China_drought_and_dust_storms) that affected Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Sichuan, Shanxi, Henan, Shaanxi, Chongqing, Hebei and Gansu in the People’s Republic of China as well as parts of Southeast Asia including Vietnam and Thailand, and dust storms in March and April that affected much of East Asia. The drought has been referred to as the worst in a century in southwestern China.
From India’s disaster: A record heat wave (http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/drought-in-india-forces-talk-of-user-fees-rainwater-harvesting/) and growing water crisis in India are forcing politicians to consider implementing user fees and other measures to conserve water. Sri Lanka (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/sri-lanka/)’s President Mahinda Rajapaksa yesterday instructed ministers (http://print.dailymirror.lk/news/front-page-news/32790-brace-for-a-crisis.html) and officials to prepare a strategic plan to face an impending food crisis as there were signs that the World is to confront a food shortage by next April.
From Russia’s disaster: (10% of total World’s output, 20% for export (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20569)) they were hit by the highest recorded temperatures Russia has seen in 130 years of recordkeeping; the most widespread drought in more than three decades; and massive wildfires that have stretched across seven regions, including Moscow.
From France’s disaster: The French government lowered their wheat crop forecast by 2.7% (http://www.fwi.co.uk/Articles/2010/09/15/123487/Lower-wheat-crop-estimates-push-price-higher.htm) over last year due to drought and cold weather.
From Canada’s disaster: Record setting drought (http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/03/31/f-drought-outlook.html) has affected their main grain producing provinces in the Western part of their Nation.
From Ukraine’s disaster: (the World’s top producer of barley and sixth biggest of wheat (http://www.manchesterwired.co.uk/news.php/96835-Ukraine-sets-grain-export-quotas-following-drought)) hit as hard as Russia by fire and drought to the point they have halted all their exports of grains in 2011.
From Australia (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/australia/)’s disaster: Fears of a Global wheat shortage have risen after the Queensland area of Australia was hit by calamitous flooding. Andrew Fraser, Queensland’s State Treasurer, described the floods as a “disaster of biblical proportions” (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8237560/Australian-floods-raise-fears-of-wheat-shortage.html). Water is covering land the size of France and Germany. It is expected to reach over 30 feet deep in some areas in coming days.
From Pakistan’s disaster: Floods have submerged 17 million acres of Pakistan’s most fertile crop land (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Pakistan_floods#Food), have killed 200,000 herd of livestock and have washed away massive amounts of grain and left farmers unable to meet the fall deadline for planting new seeds, which implies a massive loss of food production in 2011, and potential long term food shortages (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/food-shortages/).
Not only have the vast majority of our World’s top wheat producers been affected, but also one of the main grain producing regions on the Planet, South America (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/south-america/), has been hit by disasters too where an historic drought has crippled Argentina (http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/enviornment/drought-affects-90-percent-of-argentina_100268731.html) and Bolivia (http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2010/11/12/Study-Warming-could-tip-Bolivia-drought/UPI-83501289609137/), and Brazil, that regions largest Nation, has been hit with catastrophic floods that have killed nearly 400 people (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41052937/ns/weather/) in the past few days alone.
Even the United States (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/united-states/) has been hit as a catastrophic winter has seen 49 of their 50 States (http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/11/snow-present-in-49-of-the-50-u-s-states/) covered by snow causing unprecedented damage to their crops in Florida (http://www.bradenton.com/2011/01/08/2860439/freeze-hits-grocery-shelves-fresh.html) due to freezing weather, and record setting rains (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/21/california-rain-storms-co_n_799694.html#s214976&title=undefined) destroying massive numbers of crops in their most important growing region of California (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/california/).
And if you think that things couldn’t get any worse you couldn’t be more mistaken as South Korea (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/south-korea/) (one of the most important meat exporters in Asia) has just this past week had to destroy millions of farm animals (http://www.dailypost.co.uk/farming-north-wales/farming-news/2011/01/11/south-korea-struggles-to-contain-foot-and-mouth-epidemic-55578-27963139/) after an outbreak of the dreaded foot-and-mouth disease was discovered.
To how horrific the Global food situation will become this year was made even more grim this past month when the United States (http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/united-states/) reported (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=12530614) that nearly all of their honey bee and bumblebee populations have died out, and when coupled with the “mysterious” die-off (http://quazen.com/recreation/outdoors/american-bats-dying-mysteriously/) of the entire bat population in America means that the two main pollinators of fruit and vegetable plants will no longer be able to do their jobs leading to crop losses this report warns will be “biblical and catastrophic”.
Chillingly to note is that after meeting with Sarkozy, Obama began implementing his Nation’s strategy for keeping the truth of this dire events from reaching the American people by ordering all US citizens to have an Internet ID (http://www.techeye.net/internet/obama-touts-internet-id-for-all-us-citizens) so that they can be tracked and jailed should they begin telling the truth.
And so today, as agricultural traders and analysts warn (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a2aa510a-1e89-11e0-87d2-00144feab49a.html#axzz1Av3L2QKF) that the latest revision to US and Global stocks means there is no further room for weather problems, a new cyclone (http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-01-12/queensland-faces-high-likelihood-of-cyclone-off-north-coast.html) is preparing to hit Australia, brutal winter weather in India has killed nearly 130 (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5jKr8JoeqkAjGK8TjJ-8Ly47vgf4A?docId=N0104901294820798452A), and more snow (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2011/01/more_than_70_percent_of_us_cov.html) is warned to hit America, and we’re not even two full weeks into 2011…
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/01/14/obama-orders-military-to-prepare-for-spring-food-riots/
plumr2007
17th January 2011, 14:35
I believe this is part of what Charles was talking about in population control. It is the perfect paradigm: it will show any police or military called in to the riots that we are a bunch of " animals" who need to be controlled. In this way any police who may have had a shred of compassion will react with violence and deadly force and then feel justified in their actions. In many futuristic novels like Brave New World and Soylent Green the only population that is allowed any semblance of a decent life are policemen who carry out the NWO agenda. This is why the bee population was attacked , Einstein said that if the bees were gone the earth will run out of food in 4 years. GMO plants are changing the ecosystems where they are used to prevent any attempt at stopping the coming attacks. The US has passed a food bill which possibly could be used to prevent one from having a garden. It's a perfect storm that is brewing.
bluestflame
17th January 2011, 14:43
wether the weather is haarp related , or they saw it coming through remote viewing and adusted thier plans accordingly ...people need to start planting foodstuffs where they can , and save seeds for continual supply ...before the food starts disappearing off the shelves and not getting replentished
non perishibles , rice , oats powdered milk
¤=[Post Update]=¤
and i wouldn't be surprised if the threat of global food crisis and food riots were to be used as a means of inticing people into the "safety" of underground bunkers ( selected persons of certain aptitude and genetic stock )
bluestflame
17th January 2011, 14:46
um ...listed on that websiite as the source is "whatdoesitmean.com" ...sorcha faal
witchy1
17th January 2011, 20:25
How did I not see that Bluestflame. I just checked some of the links in the article however and they do seem valid. Here are some
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/geoffrey-lean/8247029/One-poor-harvest-away-from-chaos.html
http://www.france24.com/en/20110109-france-usa-sarkozy-washington-food-prices-currency-barack-obama
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/159931.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-10/corn-advances-on-concern-dry-argentine-weather-to-curb-harvest.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20569
http://www.techeye.net/internet/obama-touts-internet-id-for-all-us-citizens
bluestflame
17th January 2011, 23:03
I suspect the information is valid on the food issues , it's the spin that sorcha has been known to put on things that is the issue with his "creations"
most of my pay this week will be going on foodstuffs
irishspirit
18th January 2011, 15:52
I keep an eye on this Ulsterman as and when new material of his comes up. Please read this with an open mind.
"I cannot reconcile with that kind of behavior in a leader. There really is something missing in him. Some basic element of humanity."
our D.C. Insider, who then responded. Unfortunately, no follow-up was allowed. We hope to be able to do a follow-up soon. Some information was later edited per request prior to final publication. ______
Question: How would you rate the performance of President Obama’s Tucson Tragedy speech?
Insider: The speech itself was a remarkable display. Very powerful speech. Perhaps the president’s finest moment since taking office. The things happening outside the speech though left many of us wondering who was in charge of planning the event because that environment was almost a disaster. You were right to call into question the t-shirts. That was in very poor taste. The excuse that the Obama administration had nothing to do with those t-shirts is completely false. Every detail is run by the administration on this kind of event. Every last detail. Also, many who had attended were actually coached to be “very supportive” of President Obama. I don’t agree that this should have been “Obama’s Oklahoma”. The media is trying to make it just that, with the full support of the Obama White House/Jarrett. Tucson was a terrible tragedy. Oklahoma was something much-much bigger than that. I find it more than a bit troubling to hear all this comparison between the two events. And regarding Obama’s attitude on this tragedy. Here is something that you will never hear from the media but that some witnessed shortly after the memorial service had finished. Behind the staging area, Obama gave Michelle a “high five” and shared a laugh with her. So within minutes of seeing what is Obama’s finest moment as president it is followed by one of his worst. It is this easy and always there contradiction in the president that concerns me very very much. He was just thrilled at his performance. That was priority #1 for him. It always is. The motivation for his speech was not to heal following the tragedy, but to further appeal to the public and get their approval of him. It’s similar to that story I told you about Obama coming into the military meeting at the WH. He came in laughing and left early laughing. Maybe a photo of the high five will be released? I was told one was taken at any rate. I cannot reconcile with that kind of behavior in a leader. There really is something missing in him. Some basic element of humanity. Or humility??? Even by DC political standards the human element in Obama seems to be utterly absent. I don’t get it. I don’t understand it. And that scares the hell out of me. So that’s my assessment of the Tucson speech.
Question: Do you have anything to do with the anonymous-author Obama book coming out?
Insider: What book? http://newsflavor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif Look for more and more books to come out. Odd to see it happen before a second term has even begun but with so many having left the WH, more books will follow.
Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-obama-celebrates-shortly-after-delivering-tucson-memorial-speech/#ixzz1BP1l697O
Lost Soul
18th January 2011, 23:53
In California we would say that Obama and Michelle are plastic people. In this case, narcisstic plastic people. It's all for image and lacks any substance. Whoever on 5th Ave. is doing their marketing, sometimes they get it right (as in the election).
irishspirit
19th January 2011, 18:29
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/images/100810neilabercrombie.jpg
Neil Abercrombie
Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.
Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser (http://www.staradvertiser.com/editorials/20110118_This_is_a_collaborative_endeavor.html) he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president's chances of re-election in 2012.
Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie's spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again today another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.
Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: "You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?"
Read more: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate (http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BVVppvRG) http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BVVppvRG
jackovesk
20th January 2011, 02:48
Suggests controversy could hurt president's 2012 re-election chances
By Jerome R. Corsi - 2011 WorldNetDaily - January 18, 2011
Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.
Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president's chances of re-election in 2012.
Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie's spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again today another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.
http://www.wnd.com/images/100810neilabercrombie.jpg
Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: "You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?"
In his response, Abercrombie acknowledged the birth certificate issue will have "political implications" for the next presidential election "that we simply cannot have."
Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency
Suggesting he was still intent on producing more birth records on Obama from the Hawaii Department of Health vital records vault, Abercrombie told the newspaper there was a recording of the Obama birth in the state archives that he wants to make public.
Abercrombie did not report to the newspaper that he or the Hawaii Department of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigations to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives.
"It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down," Abercrombie said.
For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledged that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president's birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZmS_itcQo4&feature=player_embedded
Read rest of article here...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=252833
TimelessDimensions
20th January 2011, 08:31
The people always vote for someone who makes endless promises then when voted in - he doesn't keep any of his pre-election promises, and the people are once again shocked that they fell for it.
Obama Lies 7 Times In Under 2 Minutes!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfu1_Scgyow
Icecold
20th January 2011, 10:55
Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate
Suggests controversy could hurt president's re-election chances
Read more: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=252833
jcushen
20th January 2011, 11:30
His legitimacy for the role of Presidency is debatable...
But does it really matter? What's in a President?
Whoever would replace him would still be a hand puppet for the PTB, and Presidents are always pre-determined, so it begs the question, what is the point in election charades when you know it does'nt mean anything?
Any thoughts?
Ancient
20th January 2011, 12:53
His legitimacy for the role of Presidency is debatable...
But does it really matter? What's in a President?
Whoever would replace him would still be a hand puppet for the PTB, and Presidents are always pre-determined, so it begs the question, what is the point in election charades when you know it does'nt mean anything?
Any thoughts?
I completely agree. It really doesn't matter who gets elected, whether it's a Democrat or a Republican. They are still a puppet and will be controlled like they have been for generations.
The "charade" happens for the benefit of the sheep. You must keep the general populations thinking that everything is fine and the democratic system is working like it should be. A revolution is not what TPTB want right now.
irishspirit
20th January 2011, 16:57
Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, Wyoming and Maine won permission to join a Florida (http://topics.bloomberg.com/florida/) lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s health-care reform legislation.
U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson in Pensacola (http://topics.bloomberg.com/pensacola/), Florida, yesterday granted the states’ motion for permission to be added to the lawsuit filed last year by then-Florida Attorney General Bill McCollom, bringing the total of plaintiff states to 26.
“The addition of six new states to our bipartisan legal challenge reflects broad, nationwide concern about the constitutionality of this sweeping and unprecedented federal legislation,” Texas (http://topics.bloomberg.com/texas/) Attorney General Greg Abbott said in a press statement.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by Obama on March 23, bars insurers from denying coverage to people who are sick and from imposing lifetime limits on costs.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-20/ohio-wisconsin-four-more-states-join-challenge-to-obama-health-care.html
Fredkc
20th January 2011, 17:15
bringing the total of plaintiff states to 26.
While we do not (thank god) live in a democracy but a republic, may I point out to the fans of such tyrrany that 26 outa 50 is a majority? :)
Fred
irishspirit
20th January 2011, 17:24
Fred, for you!
House Votes to Repeal Health Care Law, Can Senate Follow?
WASHINGTON -- Sen Jim DeMint, R-S.C., intends to introduce a bill next week that his spokesman says is "identical" to House-passed legislation that repeals the new health care law.
Majority Republicans in the House stood unified for the 245-189 vote Wednesday to turn back the $1 trillion, 10-year package that supporters say is vital to extending insurance coverage to 30 million uninsured Americans. Opponents call the law a stinker that will break the bank while limiting access to doctors and treatment.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has vowed to prevent a repeal vote in the Senate. And if it ever did make it out of that chamber, the White House has signaled it would veto any attempt to overturn President Obama's signature legislative accomplishment.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/20/gop-health-law-repeal-hard/#ixzz1Bb5vdEXT
ceetee9
20th January 2011, 18:15
While it's encouraging that more states are joining the fight to repeal this insane piece of legislation (that virtually no Congressman read--much less understands), I'm not optimistic that they will be successful. Hey, but the good news is my TX BCBS health insurance premium only increased by 42% this year (my UHC only increased by 27% and 23% the previous two years)--at least it wasn't 59% like CA. My health insurance cost is now well above my monthly house payment. Yep, our "leaders" are really looking out for us. They should have this country completely destroyed within a couple more years. Oh, wait, maybe I'm thinking of 2012--never mind. %^)
Humble Janitor
21st January 2011, 09:02
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by Obama on March 23, bars insurers from denying coverage to people who are sick and from imposing lifetime limits on costs.
Ok, so, what's the problem with this law again?
I think these states are full of total nutters.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
While it's encouraging that more states are joining the fight to repeal this insane piece of legislation (that virtually no Congressman read--much less understands), I'm not optimistic that they will be successful. Hey, but the good news is my TX BCBS health insurance premium only increased by 42% this year (my UHC only increased by 27% and 23% the previous two years)--at least it wasn't 59% like CA. My health insurance cost is now well above my monthly house payment. Yep, our "leaders" are really looking out for us. They should have this country completely destroyed within a couple more years. Oh, wait, maybe I'm thinking of 2012--never mind. %^)
I don't think that those increases had anything to do with the health care law.
irishspirit
22nd January 2011, 08:04
Chinese National Television Xinhua (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMP_qcVo4zw&feature=player_embedded#%21) news is now reporting an impending extraterrestrial disclosure by the Obama administration.
The unprecedented national China TV news bulletin that U.S. President Barack Obama may be preparing to disclose U.S. relations with specific extraterrestrial races was broadcast on the official channel Xinhua on January 4, 2011 on the eve of China President Hu Jintao's state visit to the United States.
President Hu (http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9KSK61O0.htm) is presently visiting a Chinese language facility in Chicago, IL as of this writing on January 21, 2011.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Chinese National TV reporting impending UFO/ET disclosure by Obama government - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com (http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/chinese-national-tv-reporting-impending-ufo-et-disclosure-by-obama-government#ixzz1BkVCoHul) http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/chinese-national-tv-reporting-impending-ufo-et-disclosure-by-obama-government#ixzz1BkVCoHul
¤=[Post Update]=¤
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMP_qcVo4zw&feature=player_embedded#!
Can anyone translate this?
Gajanana
22nd January 2011, 08:22
Irish, you find some pretty interesting stuff. This guy might be able to help... http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?11513-Anyone-interested-in-what-s-happening-in-China
irishspirit
22nd January 2011, 10:15
The Obama administration is expected to release its National Security Space Strategy sometime in the next few weeks. The document will spell out how the Department of Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence will carry out the president's National Space Policy, which the administration issued last June.
Space is vital to U.S. national interests. For example, Americans depend on satellites for a broad range of critical civil and military services. The U.S. government, therefore, has a keen interest in maintaining satellite safety and security, protecting the space environment, and ensuring that insecurity in space does not threaten security on the ground.
Experts at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) expect the space strategy document to consider security primarily from a military perspective. It is unlikely that it will address broader ways to approach space security and sustainability issues.
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Obama_Administration_To_Release_New_Space_Security_Strategy_999.html
cayman
22nd January 2011, 19:06
Actually, I noticed this "News" 2 weeks ago, It's the same kind of shocking as my post on the People Daily report about "Aliens".
the original source is here: http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2011-01/04/c_12944686.htm
The main content of what the TV news anchor say in Chinese is :" UFO八卦网站AllNewsWeb宣称,美国国防部“先进研究计划总署”(DARPA)已经承认,总统欧巴马将在一项演说中脱稿间接承认,外星人可能试图联络地球人,而且各国政府在3年内会直接承认,地球人和外 星人已有接触。"
Translation: "An UFO gossip website name AllNewsWeb claim: US Defense Advanced Research Program Apartment(DARPA) had admitted: there will be a speech, in which,without script, President Obama will confess that: ETs might try to contact human, within 3 years, governments of earth will admit that human had contact with ETs."
you see, how many "probable" words they used? and the TV channel is a local TV channel, Xinhua news just quoted that as an entertainment style report. the appearance of the content itself is worthless and boring.
but background of the context is important: XinHua news is the most important official Info&Intelligence Agency under direct controlled by the Top of CCP. It doesn't own a newspaper or TV channel per say,the website is its only public channel, but everything reported in/out China is under and through its control, so, you see, it never say something meaningless or far out.
And one more thing to add: its reports about Aliens or dooms day debate stuff are increasing rapidly in the last 6 months. So you can bet on more things will come from it.
My thought is: Xinhua news Agency informations leak tactic: borrow others' mouth and others' words to say what they really want to prepare you, that create a plausible confirm and deny abilities, when things finally come out, either way, they win----two birds with one stone. that's the way they usually do.
-----*update*-----
Aldous brought my attention on Mr. Alfred Webre's comment on that, I think he is right on!
Chinese National TV Reports President Obama to Disclose Extraterrestrial Contact!
Alfred Lambremont Webre's picture
Submitted by Alfred Lambremo... on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 19:15
by Alfred Lambremont Webre
............
...........
“In fact, neither side particularly wants to admit to the public that they are in contact with aliens, however at the same time, they do not want the other side to do so first. In other words, if there is UFO admission both nations want it to be their moment of glory.
“The recent news broadcasts are probably a way for progressive elements within the Communist party to nudge the notoriously cautious President Hu Jintao by bringing to his attention the possibility that America might steal his moment and come clean.
“In an era where both superpowers possess enormous nuclear arsenals it is essential that the race to UFO disclosure does not heat up into fully blown conflict, or else alien observers themselves might be forced to intervene.”
......
str8thinker
22nd January 2011, 20:55
"An UFO gossip website name AllNewsWeb claim
AllNewsWeb? Michael Cohen? Known disinfo agent. 'Nuff said.
Etherios
22nd January 2011, 23:56
AllNewsWeb? Michael Cohen? Known disinfo agent. 'Nuff said.
yes he might be disinfo the news here is that mainstreammedia is reporting UFO. And it doesnt make fun of it. Report something enough times and it becomes a reality for the "slaves" erm people....
jackovesk
23rd January 2011, 14:25
http://gosrc.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/screen-shot-2011-01-21-at-7-39-49-pm.png?w=611&h=285
1/16/2011
The Honorable Barack Obama
The President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Re: The environmental impact of dispersing Corexit during and after the oil spill
Dear Mr. President;
The BP incident in the Gulf of Mexico has now been acknowledged as the greatest manmade disaster in history but there is yet another manmade disaster that must not be overlooked and has not been adequately addressed in the recently released report of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster.
That second major disaster has been caused by the unnecessary use of the toxin Corexit dispersant. In early May of 2010 just after the crisis began, I requested that our Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell use whatever legal means were necessary to stop the use of this toxin. Shortly thereafter, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal requested that the use of this toxic dispersant be discontinued because of the long-term environmental damage. And still later, it was reported in the media that you also ordered BP to stop using Corexit. Surprisingly, I also read in the media that they even refused your request.
Mr. President, my concern is that this toxic and damaging chemical is still being used and it will compound the long-term damage to our state, our citizens, our eco-system, our economy, our seafood industry, our wildlife and our culture.
I am well aware that our emphasis, resources and energy is currently engaged working through the administrative and legal proceedings of the oil disaster but we must also recognize and begin the same process to address the damage Corexit has done and will continue to do as we go forward.
As the State Senator for District 1 in the southeastern corner of the State of Louisiana representing the parishes of St. Tammany, St. Bernard, Orleans and Plaquemines, I respectfully request that you have your administrative officials provide the information requested in this letter. I need to make that information available to my constituents who are seeing their lives and lands threatened and their way of life hanging in the balance. Due to the threats to public safety and ecological realities, I am compelled to write this letter requesting answers to my questions regarding the role of the United States Government in administering the response to the crises in the Gulf. It is apparent that the response directed by our government was inadequate because it allowed the use of Corexit dispersants which increased the toxicity level of the spilled oil and delivered no substantial benefit.
Corexit dispersants increased the toxicity of the oil itself when the two were mixed together. Its use caused the cross contamination of the Gulf water column by forcing the transfer of the surface oil downward through the water column, causing the oil to sink to the Gulf floor. The result was an unnecessary elevated negative impact as this same oil moved ashore later to the tidal zones delivering toxic weathered oil to coastal residents, tourists and businesses and workers in the Gulf region.
Government officials stated over and over that the use of the dispersants was designed to break up the oil into smaller digestible parts to be consumed by the sub-sea living micro-organisms. This strategy is unsubstantiated. In fact, the Corexit dispersant created the opposite results since Corexit contains toxic ingredients which act as biocides to prevent microbial digestion of the oil. Physical evidence supports that the entire response administered by government agencies have been inadequate.
Independent scientists have reported the waters and our shores of the Gulf are toxic. It has been reported that the toxins in the Gulf waters are directly linked to the distribution of dispersants (Corexit 9500 and 9527A) introduced this summer (and since then) during the BP disaster. It has not all evaporated (gassed off) or digested by the microbes and the remaining contamination needs to be cleaned up and not hidden so that the toxins can be removed quickly from our Gulf for the safety of our citizens and to allow what remaining species of sea and wild life to recover; if at all possible.
Immediately following the accident, I spent a great deal of time researching this issue and met with numerous eminently qualified scientists and professionals with the hope of being able to save our coastal zone with the use of “bio-friendly” oil dispersants which I learned was available, safer, non-toxic and proven to be effective.
Today, 9 months after the accident, there is still no plan by the United States Government to clean up the toxin Corexit. Many are concerned that the oil laced with this toxic dispersant is still in the Gulf being moved constantly by currents throughout the ecosystem spreading contamination.
It is well known by many reputable scientists and environmental watchdog groups that non-toxic bio-remediation products, such as “OSE-II” was and is available. It has been used all over the world by many countries, contractors, private industry and the United States military and has been proven to be a safe solution in the past. Moreover, these types of products possess unique properties such as hydraulic lift (causes oil to float) so that the sunken oil can be raised from the sediments and detoxified.
I believe that the officials at the BP science labs have been disingenuous about their supposed desire to protect the aquiculture of the Gulf and the livelihood of the families who harvest the fisheries of the Gulf, in that they have intentionally excluded safe, non-toxic and proven bio-remediation technology to clean up the oil and toxins. BP’s refusal to use bio-remediation products to restore Gulf waters to pre-spill conditions is very disturbing to me since the EPA and USCG has approved bio-remediation for the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska years ago. BP has also used non-toxic bio-remediation technology in the Caribbean and in Africa. RPT 6 of the EPA has used OSE-II in U.S. waters as well.
Was the toxin Corexit used because it dropped the oil from the surface so it would appear that the problem was solved? Was it ever discussed that the dropping of the oil would render the huge undertaking of placing booms useless? The earthen berms called for by Plaquemines Parish President Nungesser and Governor Jindal was our only defense after the use of Corexit was employed as we witnessed in disbelief oil coming to our shores under the booms.
Please have your administration provide answers to the following questions.
1. Have acutely toxic chemical compounds been formed by the mixing of Gulf crude with toxic dispersants (Corexit 9500 and 9527A) applied individually or in a mixed ratio? If such chemicals have been mixed, please provide the ratios and provide the names of the other chemicals with which Corexit was mixed.
2. Other acutely toxic compounds have been found in the air, water, and sediments in the Gulf. Have they evaporated off with the aid of dispersants? Have your scientist reported that these compounds have come ashore, contaminating our coastal communities?
3. Is the oil spilled truly cleaned up, or has it been transformed through the evaporation and loss of lighter-chain hydrocarbons, leaving the heavier, longer-chain hydrocarbons in the water and sediments to continue delivering toxins to those exposed to them through time, which includes all the aquatic life within the Gulf waters?
4. What levels of toxins can humans safely tolerate if these toxins are taken in either by ingestion or by direct exposure from the air or water?
5. Are the Gulf waters safe? If so, define “safe.” Please define the test methods used to determine water quality and safety to assist independent scientists to verify these results.
6. Is Gulf seafood safe? If so, define “safe.” Please define the test methods used to determine safety to assist independent scientists to verify these results. The independent smell test by the USDA has on occasion proven to be inaccurate. What test equipment is being employed? USDA Director Steve Wilson will not declare verbally.
7. Were our Gulf waters safe prior to the recent 4,200 square mile ban by NOAA? If so, when? Please describe the testing methods and proof that it was safe. Where are the test data and a description of test methods that proved it was safe? What tests or methods were used to prove it was unsafe?
8. Have our Gulf onshore breezes been safe, specifically from May/June and from 2010 to present? Environmental monitoring by the federal government has surely occurred since the accident and test results as well as a description of test methods and findings should be available by now. Much is still missing in this area of data on numerous agency web sites. Please provide them. Independent scientists have reported the presence of PAH’s, 2-butoxy-ethanol and other toxic compounds in the air and in onshore rainfall. Please provide any data available on this issue, including their effects on humans, and confirm if the public should be concerned about bio-accumulation in commercial seafood or not. If indeed there is any risk of bio-accumulation, then know that it is possible to detoxify the soil and ground water, if necessary. Both NOAA and the EPA data together with some of BP’s data are contradictory within their own summations. We just need transparency regarding these issues.
9. What is the impact of prolonged exposure to these chemicals on humans in terms of toxicity and illness? What are the symptoms associated with various exposures? I ask this because in the Exxon-Valdez accident, it has been reported that all who participated in the clean up activity died within 20+ years of the accident. Understanding the chemical characteristics of the toxins used and mixed with the oil is important.
10. With respect to water samples taken by EPA and NOAA, please provide the test data and a description of test methods regarding poly-propanol, 2-butoxy ethanol, ethylene glycol, total hydrocarbons and PAH’s in the water column, not just the surface waters. Reports of chemicals in the water melting the plastics or rubber products such as diving suits and gasket seals have been reported and documented. Also, fishermen have discovered the bottoms of their crab traps dissolved or were heavily coated with rubbery tar-type oil.
11. Does the toxic effects of the dispersant Corexit 9500/9527A mixed with light sweet crude confirm that the toxicity level is increased for living organisms?
Understanding that bacteria are living organisms, I have yet to discover any definitive proof that natural bio-remediation of the weathered oil is possible by using Corexit. The claims by EPA officials and Coast Guard personnel have been confirmed to be false since 1992 (EPA/NETAC Test 1992). This is critical because it is apparent that the toxin Corexit administered did nothing but drop and hide the oil allowing for vast amounts of oil and toxins to be released well below the surface in to the water columns and the food chain. Further, it has been suggested that the toxicity level may increase with time after a spill. There is definitive proof that natural bio-remediation was a viable alternative for use at the time of the disaster and that it can still be used after the natural crude has been dispersed. It is still possible to clean up the water, the coastal lands, the marsh grass areas, the sandy beaches, the water column and the oil on the Gulf floor. EPA has approved bio-remediation products on the NCP list such as OSE-II that can raise the sunken oil to the surface for a safe natural conversion to CO2 and water which will detoxify the water column and restore the Gulf waters to pre-spill conditions. It was recommended for use in the clean up effort by the USCG Testing lab on July 10, 2010 to the FOSC (Federal on Scene Coordinator), however no action was taken. For unknown reasons, the EPA has blocked its use and continues to deny requests for use by both BP and the Louisiana DEQ.
Today in Louisiana and the other affected Gulf states, the health and welfare of our citizens, public safety, economic pain and environmental unknowns exist and the time to address this critical issue is now.
We will not be fooled in to believing that the oil and the toxins are gone. Because the toxic dispersants have been, and are still being used today, the oil is being forced downward in to the water columns and then carried endlessly around and about by the Gulf currents adversely affecting our environment.
On behalf of the citizens of all of the states on the Gulf coast, I strongly urge you to employ all of the resources you have available to guarantee a safe and healthy future for those of us in the Gulf coast states by joining with us to make sure safe non-toxic bio-remediation technology is put in to use immediately.
It is my sincere hope that this request is answered in a timely fashion so that I can advise my constituents.
I appreciate your understanding and cooperation in this matter.
Respectfully,
A.G. Crowe
State SenatorDistrict 1
State of Louisiana
cc: Vice President Biden: Vice President of the United States of America
Dept of Environmental Protection Agency: (Secretary Lisa. P. Jackson, Dana Tullis, Sam Coleman, Craig Carroll, Gregory J Wilson
Dept. of Defense: (Robert Gates)
Members of the Joint Chiefs: Secretary of the Navy / Secretary of the Army
(US Coast Guard) Incident Commander Ret. Admiral Thad Allen,
Adm. James A Watson, Adm. Mary E Landry, Adm. Paul Zunkunft)
Dept of Justice: (Attorney General-Eric H. Holder, Jr.)
Dept of Interior: (Kenneth Salazar)
Dept. of Agriculture: (Thomas J. Villach)
Dept. of Commerce: (Gary F. Locke)
Dept of Health and Human Services: (Kathleen Sebelius)
Dept of Energy: (Steven Chu)
Dept of Homeland Security: (Janet Napolitano, Thad Allen)
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu
Alabama Governor Robert Bentley
Florida Governor Rick Scott
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour
Texas Governor Rick Perry
Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell
Alabama Attorney General Troy King
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi
Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott
Louisiana Secretary of Wildlife & Fisheries Robert Barham
Louisiana Secretary of Dept. of Environmental Quality Peggy Hatch
Garret Graves, Louisiana Governor’s Office of Coastal Protection
Louisiana Secretary of Department of Health & Hospitals Bruce Greenstien
Senator Mary L. Landrieu
Senator David Vitter
Congressman Steve Scalise
Congressman Cedric L. Richmond
Congressman Jeff Landry
Congressman John Fleming
Congressman Rodney Alexander
Congressman Bill Cassidy
Congressman Charles Boustany
Louisiana Senate President Joel T. Chaisson, III
Louisiana Speaker of the House Tucker
Alabama Speaker of the House Mike Hubbard
Florida Speaker of the House Dean Cannon
Mississippi Speaker of the House William J. McCoy
Texas Speaker of the House Joe Straus
Alabama Senate President, Lt. Governor, Jim Folsom, Jr.
Florida Senate President Mike Haridopolos
Mississippi Senate President, Lt. Governor, Phil Bryant
Texas Senate President, Lt. Governor, David Dewhurst
Mr. Sean Hannity
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser
St. Bernard Parish President Craig P. Taffaro, Jr.
Acadia Parish President A. J. Credeur
Ascension Parish President Tommy Martinez
Assumption Parish President Martin S. Triche
Calcasieu Parish President Guy Brame
Cameron Parish President Charles Precht, III
Iberia Parish President Ernest Freyou
Iberville Parish President J. Mitchell Ourso, Jr.
Jefferson Parish President John F. Young, Jr.
Jefferson Davis Parish President Donald Woods
Lafayette Parish President Joey Durel
Lafourche Parish President Charlotte Randolph
St. Charles Parish President V. J. St. Pierre, Jr.
St. James Parish President Dale Hymel, Jr.
St. John the Baptist Parish President Natalie Robottom
St. Martin Parish President Guy Cormier
St. Mary Parish President Paul P. Naquin, Jr.
St. Tammany Parish President Kevin Davis
Terrebonne Parish President Michel Claudet
Vermilion Parish President Wayne Touchet
http://gosrc.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/obama-called-out-by-louisiana-senator-about-tox
SkepticSoul
24th January 2011, 18:31
still disinfo...
pyrangello
25th January 2011, 13:13
There are some good rules in the health care bill , the real problem are all the rules that shouldn't be in it like did you know that there is a provision in the health care bill to hire 14,000 new IRS agents, can't wait. - Did you know that in the new health care bill there is a new sales tax to be implemented when you sell your house you'll be paying 2.8% of the grand total to the federal government on top of your realtor fees. And since this bill is so good there are now over 200 companys that have asked for exemptions from the feds not to be in the program, why??? Because 1)either they can't afford it 2) there existing insurance is better than the new health care bill. There was also another provision added in by our state senator here that once the bills goes into effect , if you work for a certain union in the state of michigan here and the changes don't cover you there is now a provision for I think another 5 billion in supplimental pay for management personal only. Ands thats just what I know to date. I'm sorry but I have to say our new president was sure right when he said hope and change as he is approving hope for one segment of americans and entitlements and creating a division between the people of if your in bed with the government and you elect me will treat you better than the private sector. Bringing us together couldn't be farther from the truth!
irishspirit
25th January 2011, 14:30
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
http://www.wnd.com/images/110123affidavit.jpg
Notary seal on Timothy Adams' affidavit
Adams was employed at the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division (http://www.honoluluelections.us/about_us) from May 2008 through September 2008.
His position was senior elections clerk, overseeing a group of 50 to 60 employees responsible for verifying the identity of voters at the Absentee Ballot Office. It was in this capacity that Adams became aware of the search for Obama's birth-certificate records.
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery! (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104814)
"During the course of my employment," Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 (http://www.wnd.com/files/110123adams1.pdf) and part 2 (http://www.wnd.com/files/110123adams2.pdf)), "I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate."
As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.
Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate (http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C3cj7FfV) http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C3cj7FfV
grannyfranny100
25th January 2011, 19:12
Sadly, Congress never considered coverage for any alternative treatments. Many work and are much less expensive than Big Pharma drugs.
Granny Franny
irishspirit
25th January 2011, 19:22
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o276WIlU21E
gardunk
25th January 2011, 19:24
tis a wicked web they weave
those that practice to deceive
3optic
25th January 2011, 19:40
Interested to know how some of you might break down MSNBCs role in this. Is this a sincerely altruistic take by Maddow, rather expertly discerning the intent behind Obama's coded words?
Or is this some sort of manufactured dissent designed to portray MSNBC as truly objective?
irishspirit
25th January 2011, 19:42
3optic,
good call on that and my very thought also. I think that it is a little bot of both, with a little bit of, huh FU, what are you going to do about it?
3optic
25th January 2011, 19:45
3optic,
good call on that and my very thought also. I think that it is a little bot of both, with a little bit of, huh FU, what are you going to do about it?
That's what I thought! A bit of predictive programming so when dissidents are held indefinitely, it won't seem so outrageous. Maddow is actually translating the double speak so that it's very clear.
Fredkc
25th January 2011, 20:46
"cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, because evidence might be tainted, but nevertheless pose a threat... blah blah blah"
Translation:
We tortured the living hell out of them or a known associate, who would have said anything to make it stop.
In some cases we sent them to "friendly countries" where torture is legal, along with a list of questions, of course. Places that have no qualms about torturing people, or even torturing their children, in front of them, while asking questions.
Sadly, going after someone, or their children, with pliers, or hammers tends to splatter all over your nice clean suit. So we "have it done" then call the evidence (or is it the suit?) "Tainted". (but we know they're guilty, right?)
Yes it is still going on in the American People's name. Swapping Obama for Bush "change"ed absolutely nothing.
And as I predicted several years ago, "Whatever you allow government to do to "them" will eventually be done to you!"
Note: I began warning people about this clear back in 2003. For the next 4 years, I was mostly called a liberal, and a traitor. when I warned people that nothing would change with Obama, I was mostly called a NeoCon. I wonder what they'll call me now? :)
Fred
Scott
25th January 2011, 20:56
Note: I began warning people about this clear back in 2003. For the next 4 years, I was mostly called a liberal, and a traitor. when I warned people that nothing would change with Obama, I was mostly called a NeoCon. I wonder what they'll call me now? :)
Fred
They will say they always agreed with you and it was their idea to begin with ;p
Fredkc
25th January 2011, 23:43
http://fredsitelive.com/images/post/bump2.jpg
Because this was inadvertently closed earlier... now re-opened.
Fred
astrid
26th January 2011, 03:18
http://www.youtube.com/worldview?utm_source=Ticker&utm_medium=EL&utm_campaign=1_25
Sorry peoples, but i cant embed this one, u will have to click on the link
I just got off chatting to one of my less awake friends.
She has just seen this interview was singing Barry's praises, about how fantastic he is making the US...You have to wonder about the timing of this.
Why are they trying to keep the Sheeple all calm and happy, what is really going on elsewhere....
WHY NOW??
Deborah (ahamkara)
26th January 2011, 04:16
Yes, there is a strong attempt at creating a "new" reality.
I watched at bit of the State of the Union address and it was about the "Great Recession" being over and how we must now "compete" our way to prosperity. While admiting that the "old" way of life is over, we are told we must prepare to enter the brave new technology driven tommorrow. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will(soon) be over, even though the "terrorists" contine to "plot against us". The speech seemed hollow and devoid of any real truth. These are interesting times, no doubt!
AlkaMyst
26th January 2011, 04:18
Here you go astrid......thanks for this!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c362Co_ZFQU&feature=player_profilepage#t=0s
slipknotted
26th January 2011, 04:27
the reality of speech was lets just think things are better it's a bunch af smoke and mirrors i cant even get a part time job here in vegas the economy is junk and wants to paint a picture that things are getting better what a joke that speech was as im gonna be living on the streets with my son in a week, thanks to the greed are leaders support !
astrid
26th January 2011, 05:02
Yes... sorry about that peoples but it seems this was a live only link and the whole "ballons and pony " show has been removed.
If i find a copy i will post it.
It was obviously an instant gratification thing , and they didn't want anyone dissecting it after wards....
The energy of it was bad enough for me, sent me running for the garden and some time in nature.
Spin does seem to have that effect on me.
Blessings to all,
Astrid
interesting that "world view" you tube channel, is sign of more internet censorship.
http://www.youtube.com/user/worldview#g/u
"world view"...yeah right...speak for yourself.
jackovesk
27th January 2011, 04:14
http://www.youtube.com/worldview?utm_source=Ticker&utm_medium=EL&utm_campaign=1_25
Sorry peoples, but i cant embed this one, u will have to click on the link
I just got off chatting to one of my less awake friends.
She has just seen this interview was singing Barry's praises, about how fantastic he is making the US...You have to wonder about the timing of this.
Why are they trying to keep the Sheeple all calm and happy, what is really going on elsewhere....
WHY NOW??
Obama and his Administration know they are on a Sinking Ship! Why? Because they caused it!
As to your Question Why the Push now to sing Barry Satero's praises now? This is their Final Push to Drive the Markets Up before they 'Pull the Plug on Their House of Cards'!
http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=400457279667&id=a7ac5b5dd1ad42021ab3f8b0d4c0a8eb&url=http%3a%2f%2flh5.ggpht.com%2f_-NRAeQLpukY%2fSUTKI3VxBMI%2fAAAAAAAAA4A%2fYqwrxSCiSg4%2fbxp66034h.jpg
What you need to know Astrid is the $USD will CRASH this year! No doubt about it, all the Warning Signals are in place and the PTB are close to pulling the plug!
My Advice to anyone is to buy "Silver" and lots of it.
AlkaMyst
27th January 2011, 04:27
My Advice to anyone is to buy "Silver" and lots of it.
I FULLY AGREE.......I started 3 years ago, and have a substantial amount now but it's still not too late!!!
Blessings,
AlkaMyst
Etherios
27th January 2011, 10:48
I FULLY AGREE.......I started 3 years ago, and have a substantial amount now but it's still not too late!!!
Blessings,
AlkaMyst
the main issue is were to hide/keep it... cause if you just have paper that say you have on a bank silver or gold then its pointless... you need to store it somewhere else ... your home? how safe is it?
AlkaMyst
27th January 2011, 17:03
the main issue is were to hide/keep it... cause if you just have paper that say you have on a bank silver or gold then its pointless... you need to store it somewhere else ... your home? how safe is it?
I keep it at home in a safe and I guard it with this....... :)
3optic
27th January 2011, 17:29
Here you go astrid......thanks for this!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c362Co_ZFQU&feature=player_profilepage#t=0s
??? Is this 1964? What's up with the retro issues? Weird POV on this bit of propaganda. Obama admin = 60s upheaval, the nostalgia campaign.
yhvh
28th January 2011, 01:57
The Xinhua China TV broadcast on the official news channel stating that President Barack Obama may be preparing an official U.S. disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence by one perspective may be fueled by an “Extraterrestrial disclosure race” now developing between China, the U.S., and other major space powers as to which nation will be the first nation will use the authority of its Head of State and secret ET files to authoritatively declare there is an extraterrestrial presence on Earth.
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/chinese-national-tv-reporting-impending-ufo-et-disclosure-by-obama-government
mrkumamon
28th January 2011, 04:03
The Xinhua China TVbroadcast says NASA chose 7 moives like 2012 and also anounced these moives were made ridiculous.Now that NASA thinks these movies are ridiculous ,why did they still choose these 7 movies against ET existence?
syrwong
28th January 2011, 05:20
The TV Channel was ShenZhen Channel. It was disinformation. I have posted in another thread about this, here is the post:
Yes. That’s why they have a video of a Chinese TV ‘announcement’ saying that Obama is about to make UFO disclosure. That piece of video was just something from a regional TV tabloid show and was nothing of that nature. (The announcer reported an American tabloid website’s claim of Obama’s impending UFO disclosure, grinning a few times to remind the audience it was just for a laugh).
We all, particular the about-to-awaken/awakened ones, are facing a huge apparatus of misinformation/disinformation, so that the extra percentage of knowledge we fight so hard to acquire is reduced to nothingness. They have the resources to influence and control people of all walks of life. TV/news is enough for most, but the alternative media requires special treatment. Don’t overestimate our immunity to such attacks. Wouldn’t you agree?
slipknotted
28th January 2011, 06:35
funny nobody seems to have the balls needed, it would be better if an ET race would just get it over with. wishfull thinking but needed badly.
stomy
29th January 2011, 14:58
Chinese National TV reporting impending UFO/ET disclosure by Obama government
Chinese National Television Xinhua news is now reporting an impending extraterrestrial disclosure by the Obama administration.
The unprecedented national China TV news bulletin that U.S. President Barack Obama may be preparing to disclose U.S. relations with specific extraterrestrial races was broadcast on the official channel Xinhua on January 4, 2011 on the eve of China President Hu Jintao's state visit to the United States.
President Hu is presently visiting a Chinese language facility in Chicago, IL as of this writing on January 21, 2011.
View China National TV reporting impending ET disclosure by Obama administration
Examiner.com readers can view the China TV news broadcast above in this article on by clicking in the URL below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMP_qcVo4zw&feature=player_embedded#!
The original Xinhua news article and news broadcast can be accessed at this URL:
http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/video/2011-01/04/c_12944686.htm
ET Disclosure Race?
The Xinhua China TV broadcast on the official news channel stating that President Barack Obama may be preparing an official U.S. disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence by one perspective may be fueled by an “Extraterrestrial disclosure race” now developing between China, the U.S., and other major space powers as to which nation will be the first nation will use the authority of its Head of State and secret ET files to authoritatively declare there is an extraterrestrial presence on Earth.
The first nation to authoritatively announce the Extraterrestrial presence stands to gain world prestige and trust in the eyes of the increasingly extraterrestrially-sophisticated more than 6.89 billion persons populating the Earth at this time.
One journalist, Michael Cohen, notes that “Prime time TV news broadcasts announcing the upcoming US UFO admission…. have been beamed to the living rooms of hundreds of millions of intrigued Chinese citizens.
“Commentators and analysts now believe a new cold war over alien and UFO secrets is underway between the two superpowers.
“The historic decision [by Xinhua by Chinese national Television agency] to broadcast this news is seen as stemming from fears that the US might steal China's glory and admit an alien presence on Earth before Beijing does.
“In fact, neither side particularly wants to admit to the public that they are in contact with aliens, however at the same time, they do not want the other side to do so first. In other words, if there is UFO admission both nations want it to be their moment of glory.
“The recent news broadcasts are probably a way for progressive elements within the Communist party to nudge the notoriously cautious President Hu Jintao by bringing to his attention the possibility that America might steal his moment and come clean.
“In an era where both superpowers possess enormous nuclear arsenals it is essential that the race to UFO disclosure does not heat up into fully blown conflict, or else alien observers themselves might be forced to intervene.”
An opposite view by a China ET observer
One veteran China observer of expolitical affairs takes an opposite view.
He writes, "The political processes associated with Chinese National Security including elements forming political mass [interpret UFOs as] a danger to the stability of Chinese Society.
"Chinese say 'eat rice'! remember that for as long as you are watching Chinese politics. They eat rice but do not spit any out whilst talking. These people are strategists and the finest poker players on the planet. They will not disclose anything.
"The Youtube video in Mandarin is of President HU talking about websites in the USA that put up sensationalist articles on UFOs, ET and disclosure. He spoke about the USA making some good films like CONTACT but some rather exaggerated and over the top films like 2012.
"Everyone in China knows that the China /Obama disclosure story is a rumor; but at the same time everyone knows that China is being buzzed by UFOs which have closed 2 airports and created amazing aerial displays from time to time, particularly noted by Chinese academics in astronomy.
"My view is to forget about this China/Obama disclosure issue at this point in time because most people here see disclosure as an organic process, under ET timing and methodologies; a process which is intensifying alongside changes in the earths basic resonances. A necessary cosmic conditioning process for masses by the ETs, without the need for a disclosure date by a terra politician. China see's the US people as helpless, trapped by financial disaster and under extreme control of a shadow government. They love the US people but despise the US shadow government."
Chinese science and the extraterrestrial presence
In 2010 there were major overflights of UFOs over Chinese airports, shutting the airports down. Whether all of these are of extraterrestrial origin remains to be seen.
The extraterrestrial presence appears to be a more open one in mainstream Chinese science than in mainstream western science.
A leading Chinese extraterrestrial expert, “the oft-quoted Zhang Yifang, professor of physics at Yunnan University and Director of the Kunming UFO Research Association, recently claimed aliens are alive and well and living in Yunnan, Heilongjiang and Xinjiang. ‘The complicated terrain of these places makes them perfect for observation of us earthlings,’ he says. ‘But I believe they are nice and they have no intention of attacking us. Perhaps they are shape-shifters camouflaged as human beings or they have manufactured human-like robots to watch us.’”
“’UFOs are not just rumors, or fake science like some people think,’ he told That’s Shanghai. ‘It is a fact that the entire human race has to face. It needs our attention and study. Although the majority of mainstream scientists have a negative attitude towards UFOs at the moment, there are still some who recognize their existence. Since the late 1970s, UFO witness cases have started to appear frequently, and more and more scientists are starting to study it too, for example, Pan Junye, an academic at the China Engineering Academy, Zhu Jin from Beijing Observatory, and Wang Sichao from the Nanjing Observatory.’
“As if that wasn’t spooky enough, scientists at Nanjing’s Purple Mountain Observatory say that during last summer’s eclipse, they filmed an unidentified flying object near the sun for a full 40 minutes. As observatory director Ji Haisheng says, it will take months of footage analysis before the team can reach a conclusion, but still!
“Lou Jinhong, Director of the Shanghai UFO Research Center, is Shanghai’s No. 1 UFO expert. He served in the PLA’s No. 9 Aviation School in the 1970s, studied aircraft and later went on to work at the Shanghai Aircraft Research Institute. In short, he knows his flying objects, identified or otherwise.
“Lou acknowledges that 95 percent of reported UFO sightings are just hoaxes or misunderstandings, as witnesses often mistake Venus or Jupiter for more mysterious heavenly bodies.
“All the same, Lou is convinced that his own sighting was no mistake. ‘On September 26, 1971, I was serving in the PLA’s No.9 Aviation School, and my troop was located in a small valley in the suburb of Laohekou, Hubei. After dinner, we walked to the park to watch an open-air film. I can still remember, it was a colored film from North Korea called Flower Girl. The sky was very beautiful and clear, dotted with many stars. I looked up in the sky by chance and suddenly saw a spiral-shaped object slowly flying across the sky. It was twice as big as a full moon and the speed was similar to an airplane. We were all from the aviation school, so we had learned aircraft principles, discussed aircraft stories and seen many real aircraft. But no one had ever seen anything like this. Back then, no one had any idea what a UFO was, but we all definitely eliminated the possibility of it being any kind of manmade object. Since then, a giant question mark has been stamped in my head.’
“Lou argues that it’s only rational to assume Earth is not the only special planet. The conditions necessary for developing life aren’t so extreme, so we shouldn’t be the only sons of the universe, he says.
“’If I really had the chance to meet aliens, especially humanoids with intelligence, I would treat them like my own friends and family, welcome them with enthusiasm and attention, and chat with them so we would learn from each other. I believe if they can travel to our planet, it means their politics, economy, technology and culture must be more advanced than ours. So through communication, it will have an immeasurable impact on the development of us human beings.’”
January 1, 2011 report by Alfred Lambremont Webre
On January 1, 2011, this reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre wrote,
Speculation that Barack Obama has a mandate (or an inherited legacy) to be the ET Disclosure President is already fueling new rumors of an extraterrestrial disclosure by the U.S. Commander in Chief in 2011.
One news source states:
"All News Web has received information from government insiders close to the US President that Barack Obama has been given the go ahead to make an important "off the cuff" announcement regarding UFO visits and US contact with aliens.
"Allegedly DARPA has given this move the green light. The comments by the President will be made within the next month.
"Our sources claim this will not be outright admittance of UFO visits and contact with aliens, however the comments will come as close to admittance as any President has to date and will be made in the context of a speech on an entirely different matter.
"From what we understand The President will concede that there is 'some evidence' to suggest aliens might have attempted to contact Earthlings.
"All of this is said to be part of a warm up program leading to eventual outright admittance of knowledge of UFO and alien visitation by major world governments within three years."
There are multiple reasons why 2011 (or 2012 or beyond) might be the year the U.S. government finally confesses to a more than 60-year-old working relationship with many species of intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.
Reason #1 – The U.S. will disclose because the ETs are forcing it to do so
As a reporter, I am investigating the existence and information about the reported council of alien civilizations as a 'working hypothesis' based on evidence presented initially by the now deceased Stanley A Fulham, and now also by other apparent communication channels of this same regional galactic governance council.
Here is a recent article and video interview I completed about reported communications between the regional galactic governance council and a former NATO-Spanish intelligence agent, who is also a contactee of the council in addition to Mr. Fulham.
In the interview, the former NATO-Spanish intelligence agent states that he was contacted interdimensionally on Nov. 9, 2010 by a source claiming to represent the council that that summarized much of the reported extraterrestrial council plan that Stanley Fulham reported in his book Challenges of Change.
The source then stated that there would be UFO sightings over New York City (Manhattan) on Nov. 24, 2010 to as a confirmation of the validity of this information. The NATO-Spanish intelligence agent recorded this prediction publicly before Nov. 24, 2010.
As can be seen in the above article, there were in fact large-scale UFO sightings video-taped over New York on Nov. 24, 2010.
Since Stanley A. Fulham had accelerating pancreatic cancer in Nov. 2010, what seems to have occurred is that this interdimensional source stating it is representing the galactic governance council is now coming through other individuals with new information and predicted, confirmed UFO sightings.
The essence of the council's message is that in an extraordinary meeting around Jan 2010 (Earth time), members of the council met and determined to set aside the law of non-intervention, as it made a factual determination that the ecology of the Earth was on the verge of collapse and beyond the capability of human technology to forestall collapse and species extinction.
Accordingly, the council indicated it had made a decision to intervene with advanced technology (probably Pleiadean) by 2015 (if not before) and clean the atmosphere of the Earth. The council is also seeking to make a world speech explaining their ecological plan in 2014 (if not before). Both Mr. Fulham and the NATO-Spanish intelligence officer mentioned that their interdimensional sources indicated large-scale social, financial, governmental, etc changes would take place on the planet 2011-14.
From the available evidence, it would seem that the galactic governance council has the ability to identify and create credible sources for further information and updates (should all of this scenario be in fact true and authentic).
I would note the Mr. Fulham's book is the product of 10 years of research and interaction with a council-connected source, and contains a blueprint of the council plan 2010-2015.
In his last communiqué on Dec. 6, 2010 before his untimely death, Stanley A. Fulham emphasized that breaking the conspiracy of silence by the U.S. and Russia on the extraterrestrial presence was a major goal of the galactic governance council.
Mr. Fulham wrote, “The UFO ‘intervention process’ will have a major impact on the U.S. and Russian governments. This will be the catalyst that will break the ‘conspiracy of silence.’
The NATO-Spanish intelligence agent also stated that he was told the galactic governance council would be sending communications to the U.S. government in December 2010 urging them to join in the extraterrestrial intervention and ecology-cleaning process.
It seems most reasonable to conclude that ‘The U.S. will disclose because the ETs are forcing it to do so’
Reason #2 – Human consciousness will have advanced enough in 2011-12 to ‘handle the Truth’
Scientists such as Dr. Carl Johan Calleman states that starting in March 2011, the singularity - or inter-dimensional portal - at the core of our universe will commence emanating consciousness energy waves of enlightened unity consciousness.
These consciousness energy waves of enlightened unity consciousness are mediated throughout the universe, through the inter-dimensional portal at the core of our galaxy (the galactic black hole).
Our minds in 2011 are now radiated and surrounded by consciousness energy waves of enlightened unity consciousness, and we humans can access these by simple acts of will and attitudinal, emotional and perceptual openness.
Recent public opinion polls show that 48% percent of adults North Americans already believe that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth.
Dr. Calleman writes, “To begin with, for all that we know it is designed to bring a shift to unity consciousness where the human mind no longer will be dominated by any dark filter. We will in other words become “transparent” and I believe this is the particular consciousness – seeing reality the way it is with no separation - that so many are waiting for. Not just any consciousness, but one that transcends the dualities of the past and aids the human beings to see the unity of all things.
“The reason that this kind of unity consciousness can be beneficial to the planet, and to mankind, is that it is one that leads to the transcendence of all separation (between man and woman, man and nature, ruler and ruled, east and west, etc). I feel that without the manifestation of such a shift in consciousness the world will sooner or later come to an end.
“People with a dualist and separating consciousness are somewhat like cancer cells in the body of the Earth with little regard to its larger whole and would eventually generate a collapse of its ecosystem. Only a shift to unity consciousness will forever stop the unchecked exploitation of the Earth and on a deeper level make us understand that we are part of creation and need to live in harmony with it. But will such a shift just happen automatically?”
Reason # 3 – The forces for ET disclosure within the U.S. government will have gained the ascendancy
The U.S. government may chose to allow its Commander in Chief to make a statement about disclosure in 2011 because the forces for ET disclosure within the U.S. government will have gained the ascendancy within the inner workings of the ‘black budget’ and the constitutional government.
To date, Barack Obama has been a public disappointment on the issue of extraterrestrial disclosure.
Obama failed to disclose the extraterrestrial presence in 2009, despite many opportunities to do so, and firm and vocal public support:
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/barack-obama-not-disclosing-extraterrestrial-presence-is-top-et-ufo-story-of-2009
The White House website and Press Secretary continues to block any questions or information relating to UFOs or the ET embargo
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/white-house-press-association-press-secretary-robert-gibbs-block-et-ufo-press-questions-to-obama
Reason # 3 would require a great deal of internal transformation within the black budget and constitutional U.S. governments.
Reason #4 – Please go Comments section below - Add your own reasons why (or why not) the government of China and the Obama administration may be in a disclosure race as to who will publicly make an extraterrestrial and UFO disclosure announcement in 2011 (or subsequent years).
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Chinese National TV reporting impending UFO/ET disclosure by Obama government - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/chinese-national-tv-reporting-impending-ufo-et-disclosure-by-obama-government?CID=examiner_alerts_article&cid=parsely#parsely#ixzz1CR7fjl1x
Source: Examiner.com (http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/chinese-national-tv-reporting-impending-ufo-et-disclosure-by-obama-government?CID=examiner_alerts_article&cid=parsely#parsely)
MiguelQ
29th January 2011, 15:18
is there subtitles for the chinese video?
stomy
29th January 2011, 15:53
is there subtitles for the chinese video?
i will ask or if a person speak chinese...
davyj0nes
29th January 2011, 17:31
it will be interesting to see what happens. if president obama does disclose ET's could it be a distraction from something else?
what2put
30th January 2011, 20:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDoNgdlEqK8&feature=player_embedded
jackovesk
1st February 2011, 13:24
Obama decries Internet shut-down in Egypt while his own administration prepares to enact same draconian powers to crush dissent during times of political upheaval in America
The Obama administration is busy attempting to pass legislation that would give the President a kill switch for the Internet in the United States while at the same time decrying Egyptian authorities for shutting down the Internet in a bid to deflate the unfolding revolution against Hosni Mubarak. The reason is simple – the government fears an Egypt-style revolt occurring in the U.S. and wants to block access to the world wide web if and when it happens.
Chicago radio host and occasional Alex Jones Show guest Mancow Muller called it right during an appearance on Mike Huckabee’s show this weekend.
“It’s in all the newspapers, ‘Ohblahblah’, we’ve got to free up Twitter, we’ve got to free up the Internet and Facebook for these poor Egyptians – this is the President that let Wikileaks and all of this stuff happen,” said Mancow.
“They create the problems and we react to fear — the the four letter f-word that controls the masses and they offer the solution, “they” being the government. This is the President that wants the kill switch for the Internet….he wants a kill switch.”
“They fear….social networking, Twitter, Facebook, all of this stuff, but oh, no, we must have it in Egypt, but we don’t want to have it in America.”
Mancow also pointed out how Egyptians were rioting over an economic fallout that has led to crippling tax hikes, wage reductions and spiraling food prices, a similar situation to what is unfolding in America, making reference to how Illinois state authorities recently agreed to hike taxes by a whopping 66 percent.
As we have illustrated, despite invoking supposedly genuine security concerns, the only time governments have resorted to shutting down the world wide web is when they feel the need to crush legitimate dissent against the state.
Indeed, at the height of the Stuxnet worm attack, the crisis was cited as another reason why cybersecurity legislation giving government control of the Internet was necessary. It later emerged that the Stuxnet virus itself was created by the US and Israel to target Iran’s nuclear program.
The Communist Chinese government is now blocking searches for the word “Egypt” on social networking websites in China, reflecting “the government’s fears that the protests in Egypt could whip up unrest in China.”
Sina.com public relations officer Ma Taotao confirms that Chinese searches for Egypt are blocked on its instant messaging site, Sina Weibo.
Ma says the company itself did not make the decision, but is only following the “relevant Chinese laws and regulations.” He gives no details and does not say which government department is responsible. He says he does not know how long the restriction will be in force.
The authoritarian Chinese government routinely blocks Internet access when it wishes to derail organized protests and marches, a telling lesson for Americans given the fact that cybersecurity guru Senator Joseph Lieberman openly admitted that the goal of the new kill switch in the U.S. was to mimic the Chinese system of Internet censorship.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1caZvxMUWk&feature=player_embedded#
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley last year.
However, China’s “war” is not against foreign terrorists or hackers, it’s against people who dare to use the Internet to express dissent against government atrocities or corruption. China’s system of Internet policing is about crushing freedom of speech during times of political upheaval and has nothing to do with legitimate security concerns.
It’s a system concentrated around state oppression of any individual or group that seeks to use the Internet to draw attention to political causes frowned upon by the authorities.
China has exercised its power to shut down the Internet, something that Lieberman wants to introduce in the U.S., at politically sensitive times in order to stem the flow of information about government abuse of its citizens. During the anti-government riots which occurred in July 2009, the Chinese government completely shut down the Internet across the entire northwestern region of Xinjiang for days. In several regions, the authorities completely cut off the Internet for nearly a year. Major news and discussion portals used by the Muslim Uighurs in the area remain blocked. Similarly, Internet access in parts of Tibet is routinely restricted as part of government efforts to pre-empt and neutralize unrest.
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube are all banned in China and even sanitized government approved versions of these websites are now being shut down for long periods of time so that they can “remove all politically sensitive content under orders from Chinese internet authorities”.
Web censorship in China intensified after a micro-blogger began to expose the fact that many government officials, executives and judges had lied about obtaining degrees from prestigious universities. The government responded to the embarrassment by ordering websites to temporarily go into “maintenance” mode while they removed the pertinent material. What this has to do with fighting a “war,” as Lieberman claims, is anyone’s guess.
The Chinese system that Lieberman wants to bring to the United States is not only about censoring material critical of the state, it’s about identifying those who post it and thereby creating a chilling atmosphere that discourages others from exercising free speech in fear that they might be the next victims of the thought police. News websites in China now require users to register their true identities in order to leave comments.
This move towards abolishing Internet anonymity and creating a virtual ID card is a key centerpiece of Lieberman’s cybersecurity agenda.
This strategy revolves around, “The creation of a system for identity management that would allow citizens to use additional authentication techniques, such as physical tokens or modules on mobile phones, to verify who they are before buying things online or accessing such sensitive information as health or banking records.”
Only with this government-issued “token” will Internet users be allowed to “able to move from website to website,” a system not too far removed from what China proposed and rejected for being too authoritarian.
The examples of Egypt and China in shutting down Internet access to quell dissent against the state tell us everything we need to know about the motivations behind this odious policy and why it has no place in America, a supposedly free country.
While Obama criticizes Egyptian authorities for shutting down web access to disrupt protesters, his own administration prepares to launch a fresh attempt at instituting the exact same powers in America, which as recent history clearly demonstrates, represent tools for tyrannical regimes who wish to silence legitimate political opposition.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/kill-switch-obama-administration-fears-egypt-style-revolt-in-u-s.html
irishspirit
1st February 2011, 17:54
Conservative senators vowed Monday to strip President Barack Obama of his power to regulate greenhouse gases, in a move that would cripple US efforts on climate change if successful.
Eleven Republican senators introduced a bill that would stop the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases, which scientists blame for global warming, without explicit approval by Congress.
Under Obama, the federal agency has steadily increased standards on gas emissions. The Republicans accused Obama of circumventing Congress, where a so-called "cap-and-trade" bill to mandate emission curbs died last year.
"My bill will shrink Washington's job-crushing agenda and grow America's economy," said Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming and skeptic of climate change who is leading the effort.
"I will do whatever it takes to ensure that Washington doesn't impose cap-and-trade policies in any form."
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ddc0305146893ec9e9e6796d743e6af7.d91&show_article=1
Ernie Nemeth
6th February 2011, 20:40
I suspect the information is valid on the food issues , it's the spin that sorcha has been known to put on things that is the issue with his "creations"
most of my pay this week will be going on foodstuffs
If I had "pay" I'd pay my rent for February...
WyoSeeker
9th February 2011, 19:53
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23155
On Monday, while Barack Obama was hob-nobbing with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Hugo Chavez was busy handing out laptop computers to second graders at a school in Caracas. After that, the Venezuelan president rushed off to a meeting at a food distribution plant which is providing $110 million in prepared meals for Venezuela's poor. Finally, he ended his afternoon by making an appearance at one of the many construction sites where new homes are being built for the victims of January's massive floods.
It's all in day's work for Hugo Chavez.
While Obama has turned out to be the most disappointing president in the last century, Chavez continues to impress with his resolve to improve the lives of ordinary working people. For example, in just 12 years, Chavez has created a thriving national public health care system with 533 diagnostic centers and medical facilities spread throughout the capital. Health care is free and there have been over over 55 million medical consultations since Chavez launched the Misión Barrio Adentro program. Compare that to Obama's wretched cash-giveaway to the giant US HMO's which he has tried to promote as universal health care. What a joke.
Chavez has also led the way to greater political engagement and activism by establishing over 30,000 communal councils and 236 communes, all focused on entering more people into the political process and empowering them to bring about change. In the US, grassroots organizations are shrugged off by party leaders who take their marching orders from the deep-pocket elites who control both parties. And, as far as Obama is concerned, he could care less what his supporters think, which is why he went groveling to the Chamber of Commerce.
And what has Chavez done to loosen the stranglehold that corporations have on media? Here's what Gregory Wilpert says in his article titled "An Assessment of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution at Twelve Years":
"With regard to the media, ordinary Venezuelans now participate in the creation of hundreds of new and independent community radio and television stations across the country. Previous governments persecuted community media, but state institutions now actively support them - not with ongoing financing, but with training and start-up equipment.
The combination of greater inclusion and greater participation has led to a greater acceptance of Venezuela’s democratic political system, according to the annual Latinobarometro opinion polls, which allow for comparisons with other democracies in Latin America. That is, more Venezuelans believe in democracy than citizens of any other country in Latin America. Eighty-four percent of Venezuelans say, “democracy is preferable to any other system of government.” ("An Assessment of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution at Twelve Years", Gregory Wilpert, Venezuelanalysis.com)
Last week, Chavez joined the battle against Coca-Cola by attending a rally of striking workers in the city of Valencia, home to the main Coca-Cola bottling plant in Venezuela. Chavez blasted Coke saying that if they didn't want to follow "the constitution and the laws" then Venezuela could "live without Coca-Cola".
Right on, Hugo! Tell Coke to pack sand!
The 1,3000 striking workers are only asking for a meager raise to meet their growing expenses, but of course that cuts into corporate profits, so Coke is fighting their demands tooth-and-nail.
Try to imagine a scenario in which "business-friendly" Obama would take-on a major corporation?
Last week, Chavez announced that his government would spend another $700 million to fight homelessness and build another 40,000 houses. The president has stepped up his efforts since floods ravaged the country earlier in the year leaving tens of thousands without shelter. Chavez is determined not to make the same mistakes George Bush following Katrina, when disaster victims were left to fend for themselves forcing a third of the New Orleans population to flee to other parts of the country.
And what effect has Chavez had on the Venezuelan economy? Here's Wilpert again:
"Just as the Chavez government has democratized Venezuela’s political system over the past 12 years; it has done the same with its economic system, both on a macro-economic level and on a micro-economic level.
On a macro-economic level this has been achieved by increasing state control over the economy and by dismantling neo-liberalism in Venezuela. The Chavez government has regained state control over the previously quasi-independent national oil industry. The government nationalized private sub-contractors of the oil industry and incorporated them into the state oil company, giving workers full benefits and better pay. It also partially nationalized transnational oil company operations so that they control no more than 40% of any given oil production site. Then, the government eliminated the practice of “service agreements,” whereby transnational oil companies enjoyed lucrative concessions for oil production. Perhaps most importantly, the government increased royalties from oil production from as low as 1% to a minimum of 33%.
In the non-oil sector the government nationalized key (previously privatized) industries, such as: steel production (Sidor), telecommunications (Cantv), electricity distribution (production was already in state hands), cement production (Cemex), banking (Banco de Venezuela), and food distribution (Éxito)." ("An Assessment of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution at Twelve Years", Gregory Wilpert, Venezuelanalysis.com)
So, dear reader, are people better off with the telecommunications and electric companies privately owned by cutthroats like Enron (and the other Wall Street pirates) or should they be turned into public utilities?
How about oil? Are BP and Exxon better suited for the task than the public sector?
And what about banking: Would you feel safer with Uncle Sam or Goldman Sachs?
Chavez has slashed the poverty rate in half, lowered unemployment from 15% in 1999 to 7% today, and shrunk inequality to the lowest level in Latin America. In Venezuela people are getting healthier and living longer. They're better paid and more politically engaged. "84% of Venezuelans say that they are satisfied with life, which is the second highest level in Latin America." And, guess what, Chavez is strengthening social security and retirement programs, not trying to destroy them by handing them over to Wall Street in the form of private accounts.
And, Chavez's generosity has not been limited to Venezuela either. In fact, he was the first world leader to offer medical and food aid to Katrina victims. (Although you won't read that in an American newspaper!) And, he still provides free heating fuel to poor people in the northeast United States. Venezuela-owned Citgo joined with Citizens Energy "to provide hundreds of thousands of gallons of free and low-cost heating oil to needy American families and homeless shelters across the US." According to Citizens Energy President Joseph P. Kennedy, "Every year, we ask major oil companies and oil-producing nations to help our senior citizens and the poor make it through winter, and only one company, CITGO, and one country, Venezuela, has responded to our appeals."
That's right; no other oil company has given even one stinking dime to the charity. Chavez has provided over over 170 million gallons of heating oil since 2005.
In contrast, Barack Obama has done nothing for the poor, the homeless, ordinary workers, or the middle class. Zilch. He's been a dead-loss for everyone except the richest of the rich. Maybe we should swap him for Chavez?
It's worth a try.
Global Research Articles by Mike Whitney
Gwen
9th February 2011, 20:34
We should swap all the world leaders out for a Chavez - wonder if they could clone him? I'd donate.
After the earthquake he even gave the presidential palace over as a homeless shelter for people to get a bed and a hot meal.
And what do the elite want to do? Destroy him. When the US went into Costa Rica I thought it was the beginning of the end for him, that they would go into Columbia and then over into Venezuela but the new Columbian president talked to Chavez and they are settling their differences - a truly unique leader.
Then again, he could do with our prayers, I remember what happened to the Polish govt who were so loved that the streets were full of flowers when they died. Loved by your people = hated by the elite.
Lost Soul
9th February 2011, 23:48
Never mind Chavez. I want Ghandi.
dbeck
10th February 2011, 03:30
I bet the bunkers already have a list of who is going in them. But thanks for the information witchy1, there has been a lot of natural disasters over the world within the past few years, but this year seems do have done a lot of damage on our commodities. What do you think the riots in the middle east are about? I think it's more about food, not politics....
Milan
13th February 2011, 23:25
Attacking people by threatening them with planned/controlled food shortages.. Leading their primal instincts to be turned on so they act in the most primitive of ways.. Evil bastards..
stomy
14th February 2011, 16:31
WASHINGTON -- Reports that President Barack Obama's upcoming budget will propose steep cuts in the government's energy assistance fund for low-income Americans ricocheted quickly on Capitol Hill Wednesday, spurring some intraparty squabbling.
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) wrote a letter to Obama asking him not to drop funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) by about $3 billion.
"I understand that difficult cuts have to be made," the Massachusetts Democrat wrote. "But in the middle of a brutal, even historic, New England winter, home heating assistance is more critical than ever to the health and welfare of millions of Americans, especially senior citizens. I request that the administration preserve LIHEAP funding at least to the Fiscal Year 2010 funding at $5.1 billion when it submits its FY12 budget proposal to Congress."
The cuts, which were first reported by National Journal, appear to cut against the grain of previous administration policy. In 2010, Obama's omnibus budget resolution assigned roughly $5 billion in LIHEAP grants for 2011. The rationale was that at a time of acute economic crisis and rising commodity prices, a little federal assistance to those in need was politically defensible.
With that in mind, the proposed cuts offered the appearance of a president abandoning principle in hopes of winning fiscal conservative plaudits. A source familiar with the budget process, however, offered several clarifications to Wednesday's report. The cut, the source said, would be $2.5 billion in LIHEAP funding, not $3 billion. The proposed appropriation level will be $2.57 billion, which mirrors the Fiscal Year 2008 appropriation, not $2.8 billion.
And while it had been reported that the Recovery Act helped move LIHEAP funding from that FY08 level to more than $8 billion, the source said that was not the case. There was no LIHEAP funding in the stimulus, rather, there were funds for weatherization programs
Finally, the source said that "energy prices are now well below their levels in Spring 2008 when Congress decided to increase LIHEAP funding to $5.1 billion."
Story continues below
Advertisement
The latter point, designed to assuage critics who chastised LIHEAP cuts as draconian, is technically true. But the spring of 2008 is far from an ideal measuring point for energy prices, as it was the peak of a huge oil bubble that approached $150 per barrel. Currently, oil is hovering around $90 per barrel and expected to rise.
"We simply cannot afford to cut LIHEAP funding during one of the most brutal winters in history," Kerry wrote in his letter, which is reproduced below in full.
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/obama-poor-energy-cuts-kerry-letter_n_821061.html
Possibility of download evidence!
Shairia
14th February 2011, 16:36
We never seem to have a problem funding tax cuts for the rich, yet we can not afford energy assistance for the elderly and poor. Did Obama learn nothing from the protests in Tunisia and Egypt?
conk
14th February 2011, 19:09
Things like this make me believe the USA will have it's Egypt moment soon.
Think about this. The US is the way it is because that is the way Congress wants it!!! They alone have the power to make change for good. We vote them into office based upon their stated intentions. They seldom do what they say, so we give up the power by continuing to vote for them. Think again, some 535 people control 300,000,000 million of us by their actions. Why do we allow poisons in our environment? A corrupted food supply? Insane financial practices? Insurmountable debt? Organized myth as a power structure? Starving families and children? Homelessness? Putrid this and vile that? If Congress wanted these things changed, they would make the change! Real change, not Obama style 'change'.
modwiz
14th February 2011, 19:47
Freezing to death is another culling technique. Much less effective when people live in groups instead of their own mini-castles requiring fuel.
20 or more can stay warm for the price of 1 and the extra bodies provide heat of their own thereby bringing down the amount of heat that needs to be produced.
It takes a village.
Lord Sidious
14th February 2011, 20:06
Things like this make me believe the USA will have it's Egypt moment soon.
Think about this. The US is the way it is because that is the way Congress wants it!!! They alone have the power to make change for good. We vote them into office based upon their stated intentions. They seldom do what they say, so we give up the power by continuing to vote for them. Think again, some 535 people control 300,000,000 million of us by their actions. Why do we allow poisons in our environment? A corrupted food supply? Insane financial practices? Insurmountable debt? Organized myth as a power structure? Starving families and children? Homelessness? Putrid this and vile that? If Congress wanted these things changed, they would make the change! Real change, not Obama style 'change'.
Congress are only the useful idiots, they don't run anything and thank the gods for that!
The real powers want things the way they are and so they are.
Obama does what he is told to do, as do the rest.
jorr lundstrom
14th February 2011, 20:20
We have a saying: A dog that obeys is a happy dog.
Well if it works with dogs........................LOL
Shairia
14th February 2011, 20:51
We also have a saying from where I am. It goes like this "don't piss in my ear and tell me it's raining".
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2011/02/obama-to-the-obama-generation-youre-on-your-own.html
modwiz
14th February 2011, 23:11
Things like this make me believe the USA will have it's Egypt moment soon.
Think about this. The US is the way it is because that is the way Congress wants it!!! They alone have the power to make change for good. We vote them into office based upon their stated intentions. They seldom do what they say, so we give up the power by continuing to vote for them. Think again, some 535 people control 300,000,000 million of us by their actions. Why do we allow poisons in our environment? A corrupted food supply? Insane financial practices? Insurmountable debt? Organized myth as a power structure? Starving families and children? Homelessness? Putrid this and vile that? If Congress wanted these things changed, they would make the change! Real change, not Obama style 'change'.
Congress are only the useful idiots, they don't run anything and thank the gods for that!
The real powers want things the way they are and so they are.
Obama does what he is told to do, as do the rest.
Come now Lord Sidious, you are too kind. I know you wanted to say criminals instead of idiots.
noprophet
14th February 2011, 23:25
It's sad that terms like 'energy crisis' are spouted constantly while there are free energy devices being withheld form the public all over the world.
Lord Sidious
15th February 2011, 03:15
Things like this make me believe the USA will have it's Egypt moment soon.
Think about this. The US is the way it is because that is the way Congress wants it!!! They alone have the power to make change for good. We vote them into office based upon their stated intentions. They seldom do what they say, so we give up the power by continuing to vote for them. Think again, some 535 people control 300,000,000 million of us by their actions. Why do we allow poisons in our environment? A corrupted food supply? Insane financial practices? Insurmountable debt? Organized myth as a power structure? Starving families and children? Homelessness? Putrid this and vile that? If Congress wanted these things changed, they would make the change! Real change, not Obama style 'change'.
Congress are only the useful idiots, they don't run anything and thank the gods for that!
The real powers want things the way they are and so they are.
Obama does what he is told to do, as do the rest.
Come now Lord Sidious, you are too kind. I know you wanted to say criminals instead of idiots.
They are indeed criminals and remember, following orders is no excuse anymore.
I would say that the ''elected'' houses in all the democracies are the biggest organised crime gang in history.
stomy
15th February 2011, 19:19
A grim report prepared by France’s General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) obtained by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) states that president’s Obama and Sarkozy have “agreed in principal” to create a joint US-European military force to deal exclusively with a Global uprising expected this spring as our World runs out of food.
According to this report, Sarkozy, as head of the G-20 group of developed Nations, called for and received an emergency meeting with Obama this past Monday at the White House wherein he warned his American counterpart that the shock rise in food prices occurring due to an unprecedented series of disasters was threatening the stability of the entire World and could lead to the outbreak of Total Global War.
Just last week French Prime Minister Francois Fillon underlined that one of France’s top G-20 priorities was to find a collective response to “excessive volatility” in food prices now occurring, a statement joined by Philippe Chalmin, a top economic adviser to the French government, who warned the World may face social unrest including food riots in April as grain prices increase to unprecedented highs.
The fears of the French government over growing Global instability was realized this past week after food riots erupted in Algeria and Tunisia and left over 50 dead. So dire has the situation become in Tunisia that their government this morning rushed in massive amounts of troops and tanks to their capital city Tunis and instituted a Nationwide curfew in an order to quell the growing violence.
The United Nations, also, warned this past Friday that millions of people are now at risk after food prices hit their highest level ever as Global wheat stocks fell to 175.2 million tons from 196.7 million tons a year ago; Global corn stocks are said may be 127.3 million tons at the end of this season, compared with last month’s USDA outlook for 130 million tons; and Global soybean inventories will drop to 58.78 million tons at the end of this season, from 60.4 million tons a year earlier.
Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, further warned this past week that rising food prices are “a threat to global growth and social stability” as our World, for the first time in living memory, has been warned is just “one poor harvest away from chaos”.
Important to note about how dire the Global food situation has become is to understand the disasters that have befallen our World’s top wheat growing Nations this past year, and who in descending order are: China, India, United States, Russia, France, Canada, Germany, Ukraine, Australia and Pakistan.
From China’s disaster: 2010 China drought and dust storms were a series of severe droughts during the spring of 2010 that affected Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Sichuan, Shanxi, Henan, Shaanxi, Chongqing, Hebei and Gansu in the People’s Republic of China as well as parts of Southeast Asia including Vietnam and Thailand, and dust storms in March and April that affected much of East Asia. The drought has been referred to as the worst in a century in southwestern China.
From India’s disaster: A record heat wave and growing water crisis in India are forcing politicians to consider implementing user fees and other measures to conserve water. Sri Lanka’s President Mahinda Rajapaksa yesterday instructed ministers and officials to prepare a strategic plan to face an impending food crisis as there were signs that the World is to confront a food shortage by next April.
From Russia’s disaster: (10% of total World’s output, 20% for export) they were hit by the highest recorded temperatures Russia has seen in 130 years of recordkeeping; the most widespread drought in more than three decades; and massive wildfires that have stretched across seven regions, including Moscow.
From France’s disaster: The French government lowered their wheat crop forecast by 2.7% over last year due to drought and cold weather.
From Canada’s disaster: Record setting drought has affected their main grain producing provinces in the Western part of their Nation.
From Ukraine’s disaster: (the World’s top producer of barley and sixth biggest of wheat) hit as hard as Russia by fire and drought to the point they have halted all their exports of grains in 2011.
From Australia’s disaster: Fears of a Global wheat shortage have risen after the Queensland area of Australia was hit by calamitous flooding. Andrew Fraser, Queensland’s State Treasurer, described the floods as a “disaster of biblical proportions”. Water is covering land the size of France and Germany. It is expected to reach over 30 feet deep in some areas in coming days.
From Pakistan’s disaster: Floods have submerged 17 million acres of Pakistan’s most fertile crop land, have killed 200,000 herd of livestock and have washed away massive amounts of grain and left farmers unable to meet the fall deadline for planting new seeds, which implies a massive loss of food production in 2011, and potential long term food shortages.
Not only have the vast majority of our World’s top wheat producers been affected, but also one of the main grain producing regions on the Planet, South America, has been hit by disasters too where an historic drought has crippled Argentina and Bolivia, and Brazil, that regions largest Nation, has been hit with catastrophic floods that have killed nearly 400 people in the past few days alone.
Even the United States has been hit as a catastrophic winter has seen 49 of their 50 States covered by snow causing unprecedented damage to their crops in Florida due to freezing weather, and record setting rains destroying massive numbers of crops in their most important growing region of California.
And if you think that things couldn’t get any worse you couldn’t be more mistaken as South Korea (one of the most important meat exporters in Asia) has just this past week had to destroy millions of farm animals after an outbreak of the dreaded foot-and-mouth disease was discovered.
To how horrific the Global food situation will become this year was made even more grim this past month when the United States reported that nearly all of their honey bee and bumblebee populations have died out, and when coupled with the “mysterious” die-off of the entire bat population in America means that the two main pollinators of fruit and vegetable plants will no longer be able to do their jobs leading to crop losses this report warns will be “biblical and catastrophic”.
Chillingly to note is that after meeting with Sarkozy, Obama began implementing his Nation’s strategy for keeping the truth of this dire events from reaching the American people by ordering all US citizens to have an Internet ID so that they can be tracked and jailed should they begin telling the truth.
And so today, as agricultural traders and analysts warn that the latest revision to US and Global stocks means there is no further room for weather problems, a new cyclone is preparing to hit Australia, brutal winter weather in India has killed nearly 130, and more snow is warned to hit America, and we’re not even two full weeks into 2011… may God have mercy on us all.
Source: http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/obama-orders-military-to-prepare-for-spring-food-riots/
Arrowwind
15th February 2011, 19:43
Better start spending more time on the Living Off the Grid Forum learning and sharing expertise and I highly recommend this form
www.selfsufficient.com (http://www.selfsufficient.com)
Northern Boy
15th February 2011, 20:11
Once again condition the mass`s. Its no coincidence that this downturn happened at a point in history . The last major downturn that occurred was the 30`s most all who lived thru that have passed on . The survival aspects used to get thru that are gone with those who passed on. This makes it all the harder to get thru this one .
We as a people have watched the growth of processed and fast foods . Most have never opened a book to find out what in nature is edible other then what they hunt. Nature is loaded with food plants trees flowers and weeds are all edible . Insects (six legged) worms yup want to eat just rewire your mind
the_flyingboy
16th February 2011, 08:16
witchy1 that is a great find i'm shocked and i was plannig to go for a holiday to greece this year.
Humble Janitor
16th February 2011, 09:30
WE ARE NOT GOING TO RUN OUT OF FOOD.
It is a trap. They are all traps. They want us to think this so that they can direct and control our actions.
Just my thoughts. I'm sure some will disagree. That is fine.
Snowbird
17th February 2011, 04:03
Freezing to death is another culling technique. Much less effective when people live in groups instead of their own mini-castles requiring fuel.
20 or more can stay warm for the price of 1 and the extra bodies provide heat of their own thereby bringing down the amount of heat that needs to be produced.
It takes a village.
LOL!! To warm a body? LOL!!
Northern Boy
24th February 2011, 17:56
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWt8hTayupE&feature=player_embedded
crosby
24th February 2011, 18:16
that puts things into a better perspective for me. thanks
corson
jackovesk
25th February 2011, 05:49
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/02/23/obama.libya/t1larg.obama.libya.gi.jpg
Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama said Wednesday that the United States strongly condemns the use of violence on protesters in Libya and said a unified international response was forming.
"The suffering and bloodshed is outrageous and it is unacceptable," Obama said in his strongest and most direct statements to date on the unrest in Libya. "So are threats and orders to shoot peaceful protesters and further punish the people of Libya. These actions violate international norms and every standard of common decency. This violence must stop."
Flanked by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Obama said Libya's government "must be held accountable" for its failure to meet its responsibilities, and he emphasized a growing international chorus of condemnation against the situation.
"The entire world is watching," Obama said.
........................
Truer words have not been spoken Obama a.k.a Barry Soetoro! The Entire World is Watching YOU and your Criminal Globalist Gang very closely!
"In the name of Humanity" Obama? Gimme a Break! We all know what you and your Criminal Cabal are up to!
Reading between the lines Obama and his NWO mates will go into Libya and do 1 of 2 things.
1. Go in there and stop the people's uprising &
2. Take control of Libya and put in another puppet!
You & Your mates 'MO' is so predictable Barry!
http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/02/23/exp.obama.libya.reax.cnn
chelmostef
25th February 2011, 07:06
Is it me or does hillary seem to be looking at Obama with a "Just do as your bloody told look on her face"
Ahkenaten
25th February 2011, 07:13
No Hilary is looking at him saying to herself "WHAT! I should be on that podium making these statements, NOT YOU! ((%$###*^#@*?!"
chelmostef
25th February 2011, 07:21
A case of the green eyed monster poping out!!
gardunk
25th February 2011, 17:28
the puppets talk
jackovesk
28th February 2011, 17:36
A spokesman for a Libyan rebel group says his organization does not want foreign governments to intervene in their struggle against Moammar Gaddafi’s regime, Al Arabia reports. see link at bottom of post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myc0xk-rn10&feature=player_embedded#at=11
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Sunday that the U.S. is prepared to offer “any kind of assistance” to Libyans looking to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi’s regime. “We are reaching out to many different Libyans in the east as the revolution moves westward there as well,” Clinton said before leaving to discuss the ongoing crisis with diplomats in Geneva.
Also on Sunday, Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain and independent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman both stopped short of calling for military intervention on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Lieberman said the U.S. “should recognize the opposition government as the legitimate government of Libya and that we ought to give that government, certainly, humanitarian assistance and military arms.” Although McCain did not call for a military response, he refused to rule out the possibility.
Hafiz Ghoga, the spokesman for the newly formed National Libyan Council in the rebel controlled eastern city of Benghazi , said “foreign intervention” would not be welcome.
“The rest of Libya will be liberated by the people … and Gaddafi’s security forces will be eliminated by the people of Libya,” Ghoga said at a news conference. His remarks were not a direct response to Clinton’s comments, according to Reuters.
According to Ghoga, the National Libyan Council was formed as a “political face…for the revolution” and is not an interim government.
“We will help liberate other Libyan cities, in particular Tripoli through our national army, our armed forces, of which part have announced their support for the people,” Ghoga continued. He also told reporters that it was “premature to talk about elections” while fighting continues.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/02/27/libyan-rebels-say-they-dont-want-foreign-intervention/
More info from Al Arabia below...
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/02/27/139495.html
irishspirit
28th February 2011, 17:45
Barack Obama (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/barack-obama) may be forced to order a two-year delay in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action on climate change (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/climate-change) to try to avoid a complete government shutdown, an environmental conference has been warned.
President Obama faces the prospect of a government shutdown by 4 March, with a funding gap leading to federal employees being sent home and government services temporarily closing down, unless he can reach a deal with Congress Republicans who are demanding a crippling $61bn (£38bn) in budget cuts. The house will begin debate on the spending bill on Tuesday following efforts at the weekend to avoid a government shutdown, with news reports suggesting Republicans might compromise on some of the cuts.
The Republican plan would destroy Obama's capacity to pursue his green agenda, cutting the budget of the EPA by 30%, and stripping funds for projects he has championed such as clean energy research and high-speed rail (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/26/obama-clean-energy-state-union).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/feb/28/barack-obama-delay-climate-action
firstlook
28th February 2011, 17:51
Cutting the budget of the EPA.
Where else would the corporations like to make budget cuts. ;) :hungry:
firstlook
28th February 2011, 18:06
So all this March Event taking place is sure adding up. Is this a cover?
Calz
28th February 2011, 18:09
call me crazy ... but I expect within a couple years time "the events" will be calling the shots and not the "government'
Odah
28th February 2011, 22:48
well you know after having BP write the energy policy they where going to use .. and having many of the green energy factories close up shop and move to china .. they are kinda scrambling over there.
Climate action is more like how to triple American energy costs.. they are kinda starting to worry we will revolt in some way . The government itself in the US is the biggest poluter .. they don't have to follow the rules they put out their ... and big corperations have moved their most polluting functions over seas.
Climate action would be used against the american people not the big corps. i want climate action the will anger the hippy librals.. ban the sale of water in under 1 gallon jugs.
K626
28th February 2011, 22:53
The elites plan to use 'climate change' as a blank cheque.
cheers
K
Lord Sidious
1st March 2011, 03:21
If the zionists do invade Libya, they will dilute their forces even more.
That risks the other nwo factions gaining more control.
So this is a risky proposition for them.
Teakai
10th March 2011, 08:43
I was just watching Julia Gillard addressing congress in the US today.
Here's the links for anyone who feels like partaking in some masochism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqWO1bURJM4
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA8NgYbQI
But, I wondered where Obama was. I'd recently read that Bill Gates, and Rockefeller and all his family were over in India.
And so I'm wondering - is Obama there too? Or is it normal for the President not to be at such meetings?
Smells fishy.
crosby
10th March 2011, 08:51
Teakai, i wouldn't be surprised if all of the inner circle were in hiding at this moment. the u.s. is in economic freefall. they know their a$$e$ are on the line now. they won't come out for a while, if at all. and i think you're correct about the Gates' and Rockefeller families. with the dropping of all u.s. treasuries, our economic future is in great demise. i can't believe that they are letting this happen.
warmest regards, corson
Icecold
10th March 2011, 09:04
What a crock of ****. I'm embarrassed to be an Australian. Maybe I should move overseas.
The puppet speaks. "Friends, Romans and countrymen lend me your carrots."
Dressed as a carrot, a disguised Julia Gillard.
PM announces plan to foster US business ties
Right good call Julius, they won't have an economy shortly.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/10/3160922.htm?section=justin
jorr lundstrom
10th March 2011, 09:09
What a crock of ****. I'm embarrassed to be an Australian. May I should move overseas.
The puppet speaks. "Friends, Romans and countrymen lend me your carrots."
Youre welcome, would you like a cup of coffee? Snow is falling, barbequed boar for supper.
And of course a lot of love and carrots
Icecold
10th March 2011, 09:13
Youre welcome, would you like a cup of coffee? Snow is falling, barbequed boar for supper.
And of course a lot of love and carrots
LOL. Don't laugh you are on my visitor list. Warm up the sauna old son. I'll bring the carrots.
modwiz
10th March 2011, 09:20
I can thank Obama for waking me up to the rot at the top. Never, in my lifetime, has one person said so much that touched my heart and lifted my spirit in the darkest days of my life and then thrown them into a soiled chamber pot like a cigarette butt and have the water tossed on me. To then try and tell me I'm not wet.
People who should have been put in jail got record bonuses instead. Insurance companies got guaranteed customers for services they won't render.
My guess is he is ducking for cover.
No carrots for him either!
Icecold
10th March 2011, 09:24
He was put in place by the Bilderberg Group. He's their puppet. I see him as body armour for the invisible government.
He takes the hits, while they get on with the business of raping the world.
Teakai
10th March 2011, 09:28
Thanks Corson - I did some sleuthing and I think maybe they used old footage in the news to make it look as if they met today, bu-u-u-u-ut, when she meets Obama (apparently today) she is wearing black pants and largish pearl drop earings a red jacket with an approx. 75 degree angle between the collar and the lapel - and when addressing congress she is wearing a black skirt, stockings and a different pair of smaller ball earings and a red jacket with an approximate 45 degree angle between collar and lapel.
Also the points of the lapel of the Obama meeting jacket are way above the black top she wears underneath, which looks as though it has a slight V neck to it - and in the congress address the lapel points are lower than the black top she's wearing beneath. And the collar is different as well.
Exhibit A - of the apparent meeting today:
http://media.theage.com.au/world/world-news/gillard-obama-and-i-are-great-mates-2220649.html
Exhibit B. Meeting with congress:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqWO1bURJM4
Still picture of jacket with Obama meeting:
http://www.allword-news.co.uk/images/Australias%20Julia%20Gillard%20and%20Barack%20Obam a%20affirm%20ties.jpg
Teakai
10th March 2011, 09:32
I can thank Obama for waking me up to the rot at the top. Never, in my lifetime, has one person said so much that touched my heart and lifted my spirit in the darkest days of my life and then thrown them into a soiled chamber pot like a cigarette butt and thrown the water on me. And then try and tell me I'm not wet.
Yeah, well, you know what they say, Modwiz:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A
Wise words indeed - sorta.
:)
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 18:35
Wise words indeed - sorta.:)
What few people realize is that there is another reason for Bush's difficulty with this simple saying -- Bush is a sociopath. Sociopaths have no clue what shame is. So Bush is trying to talk about something (shame) that he does not understand at all! No wonder he can't find any meaning to help him in his confusion! One thing he does know a great deal about is fooling people, and emphasizing that part of the old saying is how he eventually makes his recovery.
This is also a great example of how normal people project their "normalcy" onto sociopaths, which helps sociopaths remain invisible. Non-sociopaths imagine that Bush is just having trouble remembering how the saying goes, because they have experienced that difficulty themselves. So to them, this is just an amusing, even charming, little slip-up. That there could be a psychological factor at play here never enters their minds.
ghostrider
10th March 2011, 19:04
yeah currently the world reserve currency is the dollar, they are changing that and the dollar will collapse and the price of everything will double overnight, yet your money will be worth half. chaos
Fred259
10th March 2011, 19:06
He was put in place by the Bilderberg Group. He's their puppet. I see him as body armour for the invisible government.
He takes the hits, while they get on with the business of raping the world.
Yup, but he is a lot worse than that Ice..
Obama is a Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (‘CUKC’). QinetiQ implanted an Alien RFID device in his back passage to steer him past investigators and into the White House
K626
10th March 2011, 19:09
I was just watching Julia Gillard addressing congress in the US today.
Here's the links for anyone who feels like partaking in some masochism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqWO1bURJM4
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA8NgYbQI
But, I wondered where Obama was. I'd recently read that Bill Gates, and Rockefeller and all his family were over in India.
And so I'm wondering - is Obama there too? Or is it normal for the President not to be at such meetings?
Smells fishy.
Pretty sure Obama is part of the Zionist Rockefellar/Goldman Sachs clan. If not then he is certainly one of its main puppets.
K626
10th March 2011, 19:13
I can thank Obama for waking me up to the rot at the top. Never, in my lifetime, has one person said so much that touched my heart and lifted my spirit in the darkest days of my life and then thrown them into a soiled chamber pot like a cigarette butt and thrown the water on me. And then try and tell me I'm not wet.
People who should have been put in jail got record bonuses instead. Insurance companies got guaranteed customers for services they won't render.
My guess is he is ducking for cover.
No carrots for him either!
Echo those sentiments obviously.
"Real change we can believe in"...
Repeat to fade.
cheers
k
jorr lundstrom
10th March 2011, 19:26
He was put in place by the Bilderberg Group. He's their puppet. I see him as body armour for the invisible government.
He takes the hits, while they get on with the business of raping the world.
http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt81/sakasvattaja/zaphodbeeblebrox.jpg
Zaphod Beeblebrox only mission as president of the universe was to keep the attention away
from the power. LOL
Charlie Pecos
10th March 2011, 19:40
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
Meesh
10th March 2011, 19:54
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
Obama's actions have driven home that lesson for me. While they keep us focused on left vs. right/ democrat vs. republican, and while elected officials make their empty promises, TPB do their dirty work. As I said, lesson learned.
shybastid
10th March 2011, 20:09
At least I was ALWAYS afraid of the Bush families world dominence. And yes, If you think Hilary wasn't a choice for world trade negotiations by design by Bildenburg,think again.
Obama is also under the same rules created by TPTB and Bushes.
Clintons have been a part of cross and bones since day one.
http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/bonesmembers.html
OH, they have a secret handshake too.
http://whitehouse.georgewbush.org/administration/skullandbones/pledge.html
It's not new news,still disappointing.
Hope being replaced by fear in 2 short years. Under Bush,we knew it was probably hopeless.
Oh well..
Charlie Pecos
10th March 2011, 20:34
My business partner, who is a Vietnam Vet, a really good guy, is convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama is running this country into the ground, it's all HIS fault. I keep trying to tell him it has nothing to do with Obama. My partner listens to Limbaugh (big surprise) and believes every word the man says. I can't take it, drives me crazy.
My fellow countrymen by and large just don't see it. Our civilization is coming to an end and they have no clue.
Front row seats to the worst train wreck in history anyone?
K626
10th March 2011, 20:55
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 21:09
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 21:40
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
The very definition of organised crime.
K626
10th March 2011, 21:42
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
It's cause they don't class the 'vast majority' as humanity.
cheers
K
Möbius
10th March 2011, 21:51
This is how I view the Western World & Democracy:
(1) Obama is CEO of The United States of America Corporation.
(2) Cameron is the CEO of The United Kingdom Corporation.
(3) Canada, New Zealand and Australia are all part of the same Corporation with their own CEOs.
(4) The Board of Directors of this Global Corporation are the Elite.
(5) Democracy is basically when we, the electorate, get to choose who is going to be the CEO from a small group of candidates carefully selected by the Board of Directors (The Elite).
(6) The CEOs are steered by the Board of Directors (the Elite).
(7) The role of the CEOs' is to maximise the profits for the shareholders / Board of Directors (the Elite).
(8) The CEOs have their Armed Forces at their disposal to help maximise profits for the shareholders / Board of Directors (Elite).
(9) The Board of Directors use their global Armed forces (Nato/UN) where necessary to aid hostile takeovers of other Corporations (Countries)
(10) All the earnings from the electorate end up as either direct tax, indirect tax, buying products / services, savings in banks etc all of which are controlled and owned by the Corporation.
(11) All debt owed by the electorate is owed to the Corporation.
(12) The music, media, tv and film industries are controlled by the Corporation to amuse / distract / control the electorate.
This is probably why this planet is so screwed up....
Fred259
10th March 2011, 23:02
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
I would agree with you entirely Chico, all I would add is that it’s all controlled by the Corporation of London.
The scale of the crime and embezzlement is of humongous proportion. Blackmail sextortion, murder, snuff it’s at the stage now that I really don't think it can be resolved other than the Marines storming the capital (and the SAS in London) and taking these ***tards at gunpoint.
We need a military government in both capitals for as long as it takes to get all the criminals, including the whole of your Senior Executive Service and the Civil Service in London, rounded up and incarcerated. We need a Nuremburg II.
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 23:07
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
I would agree with you entirely Chico, all I would add is that it’s all controlled by the Corporation of London.
The scale of the crime and embezzlement is of humongous proportion. Blackmail sextortion, murder, snuff it’s at the stage now that I really don't think it can be resolved other than the Marines storming the capital (and the SAS in London) and taking these ***tards at gunpoint.
We need a military government in both capitals for as long as it takes to get all the criminals, including the whole of your Senior Executive Service and the Civil Service in London, rounded up and incarcerated. We need a Nuremburg II.
I will do something I was told never to do, volunteer.
Can I be the axeman?
I will supply my own too.
Charlie Pecos
10th March 2011, 23:11
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
IMHO, when the country was founded. We were ultimately started by the banks in England, the moneyed interests in Europe. If you go back and look at the politics surrounding the advent of the U.S. of A, you will find a lot of the same B.S. we endure today, politcally speaking. Left vs right paradigm. Moneyed interests deciding American policy. Elected officials having to vote for someone elses BS just so that their own bill gets passed. Politics has always been dirty. It has gotten progressively worse over several hundred years with the worst damage done in the
20th century. Up until that time, we actually had some decent leaders who vehemently resisted the banks taking over our government, the printing presses and our lives. They warned us again and again of the evils of allowing corporate interests into the political arena. Our leaders privatized the currency system and did away with the gold backed dollar. Where did that gold go? They did away with silver, same thing. Like Peter Joseph says, "the Federal Reserve is about as federal as Federal Express". Its a PRIVATE corporation.
How did we let this happen? Through trickery, the same trickery that has been used to bleed off almost all of our supposed constitutional rights. And the worst part of whole sham is we let it happen . "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Well, we did plenty of nothing, but it was easy for them. They distracted us with division at every turn. They gave us sports then television. I can't even begin to express how stupid sporting events are. (I know I'm not making any friends with this statement, but c'mon, take a look and you will find that it is true.) They distract and divide us. Celebrities serve the same purpose. We are so focused on what the rich and famous are doing, we can't possibly be bothered to monitor what our "elected" officials are doing. So long as we have our SUV's, our Big Mac's, and our flat screen hi def tv's, we don't care what happens. We took the bait. Now comes the pain.
Teakai
10th March 2011, 23:13
This is also a great example of how normal people project their "normalcy" onto sociopaths, which helps sociopaths remain invisible. Non-sociopaths imagine that Bush is just having trouble remembering how the saying goes, because they have experienced that difficulty themselves. So to them, this is just an amusing, even charming, little slip-up. That there could be a psychological factor at play here never enters their minds.
That's not what I thought, Chicodoodoo. I've seen too many Bush blooper takes. I was thinking more along the line of chemical consumption and brain rot.
Charlie Pecos
10th March 2011, 23:26
This is how I view the Western World & Democracy:
(1) Obama is CEO of The United States of America Corporation.
(2) Cameron is the CEO of The United Kingdom Corporation.
(3) Canada, New Zealand and Australia are all part of the same Corporation with their own CEOs.
(4) The Board of Directors of this Global Corporation are the Elite.
(5) Democracy is basically when we, the electorate, get to choose who is going to be the CEO from a small group of candidates carefully selected by the Board of Directors (The Elite).
(6) The CEOs are steered by the Board of Directors (the Elite).
(7) The role of the CEOs' is to maximise the profits for the shareholders / Board of Directors (the Elite).
(8) The CEOs have their Armed Forces at their disposal to help maximise profits for the shareholders / Board of Directors (Elite).
(9) The Board of Directors use their global Armed forces (Nato/UN) where necessary to aid hostile takeovers of other Corporations (Countries)
(10) All the earnings from the electorate end up as either direct tax, indirect tax, buying products / services, savings in banks etc all of which are controlled and owned by the Corporation.
(11) All debt owed by the electorate is owed to the Corporation.
(12) The music, media, tv and film industries are controlled by the Corporation to amuse / distract / control the electorate.
This is probably why this planet is so screwed up....
Agree except for one thing:
Obama is no CEO, he is a salesman. He gives a very good pitch or at least he did, until we saw him for what he is. It really is that simple. He was hired to sell us on the course his controllers want to go in. He has absolutely no control over anything. Anybody here ever hear of the "dog whisperer", Caesar Milan? Well, in his most recent book, Caesar points out that the last American president to have a power breed in the white house was JFK. JFK was also the LAST president to stand up the "them", he was the "peace president"....they killed him for it. Do you honestly think that every new president is not clued into this little fact? They tell him jump, and he had better damn well do it or else. These supposed world leaders are not leaders at all, they are corruptible puppets.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
I would agree with you entirely Chico, all I would add is that it’s all controlled by the Corporation of London.
The scale of the crime and embezzlement is of humongous proportion. Blackmail sextortion, murder, snuff it’s at the stage now that I really don't think it can be resolved other than the Marines storming the capital (and the SAS in London) and taking these ***tards at gunpoint.
We need a military government in both capitals for as long as it takes to get all the criminals, including the whole of your Senior Executive Service and the Civil Service in London, rounded up and incarcerated. We need a Nuremburg II.
No more leaders, no more militaries, no more governments. Haven't we had enough? The best punishment for these people is obscurity and triviality.
Teakai
10th March 2011, 23:28
Pretty sure Obama is part of the Zionist Rockefellar/Goldman Sachs clan. If not then he is certainly one of its main puppets.
I think he's one of the bloodline rather than a puppet. Didn't some school kid trace his ancestory back recently? - hold on, will go find it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gllL1_4iXA
Fred259
10th March 2011, 23:32
Interesting Charlie Pecos,
So do we take it then that Obama will just be a one term president, or how do you see this panning out?
What do African Americans really think?
F
Charlie Pecos
10th March 2011, 23:40
Interesting Charlie Pecos,
So do we take it then that Obama will just be a one term president, or how do you see this panning out?
What do African Americans really think?
F
Unless he finds a way to stay in power, then yes, he is a one term president. Bare in mind he does nothing without his masters' approval.
I have heard it both ways in terms of African Americans. Some are quite displeased with him, others still like him. But for the most part, he did not live up to his promises, the whole hope and change thing. It's the continuation of the Bush policies that has everyone P***** off. I can't help but wonder that since the game is so obvious, he is actually the last American president, by design.
Fred259
10th March 2011, 23:47
Interesting Charlie Pecos,
So do we take it then that Obama will just be a one term president, or how do you see this panning out?
What do African Americans really think?
F
Unless he finds a way to stay in power, then yes, he is a one term president.
I have heard it both ways in terms of African Americans. Some are quite displeased with him, others still like him. But for the most part, he did not live up to his promises, the whole hope and change thing. It's the continuation of the Bush policies that has everyone P***** off. I can't help but wonder that since the game is so obvious, he is actually the last American president, by design.
Yup, I had that feeling as well.
So what happens next you are 350 million people?
GlassSteagallfan
10th March 2011, 23:52
My business partner, who is a Vietnam Vet, a really good guy, is convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama is running this country into the ground, it's all HIS fault. I keep trying to tell him it has nothing to do with Obama. My partner listens to Limbaugh (big surprise) and believes every word the man says. I can't take it, drives me crazy.
My fellow countrymen by and large just don't see it. Our civilization is coming to an end and they have no clue.
Front row seats to the worst train wreck in history anyone?
I'll bring the popcorn.
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 00:21
Interesting Charlie Pecos,
So do we take it then that Obama will just be a one term president, or how do you see this panning out?
What do African Americans really think?
F
Unless he finds a way to stay in power, then yes, he is a one term president.
I have heard it both ways in terms of African Americans. Some are quite displeased with him, others still like him. But for the most part, he did not live up to his promises, the whole hope and change thing. It's the continuation of the Bush policies that has everyone P***** off. I can't help but wonder that since the game is so obvious, he is actually the last American president, by design.
Yup, I had that feeling as well.
So what happens next you are 350 million people?
Well that is the 350 million person question then isn't it?
As I posted elsewhere:
I spend an inordinate amount of time contemplating how our world will change. The only thing that seems to even come close to logical, is for the human population to be greatly reduced through natural cyclical means in order to facilitate a new understanding and implementation of a highly evolved society, one in which all of the old ways are discarded as unnecessary and destructive, in favor of ideals very much in tune with the planet, the Creator, and the universe.
My personal feeling is that there is much pain to come as far as the US is concerned (and the world for that matter). Spiritually speaking this is not exactly a love and light outlook, but I have to go with what I feel. In the long run it will be the best thing that ever happened to this planet and it's people. We will all be free, and we will see ourselves as one race. The first true civilization.
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 00:28
My business partner, who is a Vietnam Vet, a really good guy, is convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama is running this country into the ground, it's all HIS fault. I keep trying to tell him it has nothing to do with Obama. My partner listens to Limbaugh (big surprise) and believes every word the man says. I can't take it, drives me crazy.
My fellow countrymen by and large just don't see it. Our civilization is coming to an end and they have no clue.
Front row seats to the worst train wreck in history anyone?
I'll bring the popcorn.
I've got the beer!
Teakai
11th March 2011, 00:33
I've got the beer!
I'll bring the water and lentils.
;)
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 00:39
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact.
This is the naked truth. Behind those banks and corporate interests are organized sociopaths working in concert, Service-To-Self to the core, damaging humanity with utter indifference, no sense of responsibility, no shame, no compassion, and certainly no empathy. And the victims of all this, the vast majority of humanity, are completely unaware of the true source of their misery, having been deliberately deceived by the con-men running the game.
The perfect storm.
It's cause they don't class the 'vast majority' as humanity.
cheers
K
This is quite correct, they view us as little more than "stupid chickens".
To murder 4.5 billion people is inconsequential to them, in fact a necessity.
As game keepers go, they have orchestrated much harm to the game and the reserve.
But the animals went along with it too, we share the responsibility for the condition of our habitat.
shybastid
11th March 2011, 01:18
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
Unfortunetly, It started going wrong when I started realizing just how wrong we've been as a Country for such a long time. No other countries are without guilt either. Just a disapointent that Countries are really for the PTB for themselves first. Then US commoners. I don't mean commoner in a rude way. Just not one of THEM.
So we don't count as much, with or without a vote. First money and power...then the rest of us.
witchy1
11th March 2011, 01:20
I'll bring the water and lentils..... Lentils, couldn't you scrounge up anything better - at least "chateau cardboard" for the ladies and some sausage rolls - LOL
Teakai
11th March 2011, 01:23
Lentils, couldn't you scrounge up anything better - at least "chateau cardboard" for the ladies and some sausage rolls - LOL
*tsk* Witchy. It's all about raising frequency - don'tcha know???
Teakai
11th March 2011, 01:31
I came across this about Julia G's address to congress:
"Americans love gushing rhetoric. Australians don't.
But then a domestic audience was not in mind when writing this speech.
The so-called "crawling" was described by foreign media as about laying groundwork for sensitive trade negotiations, such as reducing US farming subsidies, and a not-so-subtle call to US leaders that despite the Middle East problems, they needed to focus attention on our region in the face of a rising China.
Ms Gillard may have silenced critics and finally proven she can cut it on the international stage, if bringing nostalgic members of the US political scene to the verge of tears is any measure of success.
But as important as it was for the reaffirmation of Australian/US ties in an uncertain world, it again raises questions about Ms Gillard herself and who she really is."
From: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/americans-adore-julia-gillard-but-aussies-not-big-on-gushing/story-e6freuzr-1226019374811
I just read through all the comments and there's only one in support of her speech (I suspect she may have ordered her secretary to type it)
I'm still trying to find Obama.
witchy1
11th March 2011, 01:55
I'm still trying to find Obama. - Hes probably just suffering withdrawl after giving up nicotine - so not fit for audience.
*tsk* Witchy. It's all about raising frequency - don'tcha know??? the wine assists I heard, (plus the pastry to soak it all up) hahaha
Chicodoodoo
11th March 2011, 02:02
Obama is no CEO, he is a salesman. He gives a very good pitch or at least he did, until we saw him for what he is. It really is that simple. He was hired to sell us on the course his controllers want to go in. He has absolutely no control over anything.
At last! I've found somebody with the same political views as me. I'm no longer alone in the world. Thanks, Charlie!
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 15:41
Obama is no CEO, he is a salesman. He gives a very good pitch or at least he did, until we saw him for what he is. It really is that simple. He was hired to sell us on the course his controllers want to go in. He has absolutely no control over anything.
At last! I've found somebody with the same political views as me. I'm no longer alone in the world. Thanks, Charlie!
Then, in my estimation, we both view our world correctly my friend. You are not alone, never have been. It was just an illusion.:)
BTW-Love your signature line!
slipknotted
11th March 2011, 16:59
are goverment is a complete joke, everybody and i mean everybody is disgusted with the way things are done in america and there will be a revolution here you watch.
Kal
11th March 2011, 17:31
Disturbing thing my wife came across last night. She is an ASL translator for deaf students at a local college. In a class the professor mentioned Obama for whatever reason while it was her teamer's turn. Instead of spelling it as is common for names when using ASL she used a sign of making an O then the sign for God. My wife said it actually made her nauseous when she saw it.
It amazes me the treatment this clown gets from the sheeple. The guys had a million red flags out there for anyone to find before he got elected but everyone ignored them and bought the MSM spin. The great irony is he basically ran against Bush and is now Bush 2.0, still shocks me how many don't see it and are in the tank for him. At least many have woken up however and are realizing the BS they were sold.
Kal
11th March 2011, 17:35
Just to clarify my position it doesn't matter who you vote for, they all have the same master. Just made me sick the worship and following this guy had prior to the election. I felt like I was in bizarro world.
Chicodoodoo
11th March 2011, 17:52
BTW-Love your signature line!
Would you believe it's an original? I was always bothered by that famous line in the movie "A Few Good Men". And then one day not so long ago, I understood why. It was like an epiphany, and suddenly the entire "civilized" world was condensed into a single sentence.
Lord Sidious
11th March 2011, 19:28
Disturbing thing my wife came across last night. She is an ASL translator for deaf students at a local college. In a class the professor mentioned Obama for whatever reason while it was her teamer's turn. Instead of spelling it as is common for names when using ASL she used a sign of making an O then the sign for God. My wife said it actually made her nauseous when she saw it.
It amazes me the treatment this clown gets from the sheeple. The guys had a million red flags out there for anyone to find before he got elected but everyone ignored them and bought the MSM spin. The great irony is he basically ran against Bush and is now Bush 2.0, still shocks me how many don't see it and are in the tank for him. At least many have woken up however and are realizing the BS they were sold.
How dare you call obama a clown!
I like clowns.
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 20:02
BTW-Love your signature line!
Would you believe it's an original? I was always bothered by that famous line in the movie "A Few Good Men". And then one day not so long ago, I understood why. It was like an epiphany, and suddenly the entire "civilized" world was condensed into a single sentence.
Well, you hit the nail on the head as it were. If we had the same knowledge they do, there isn't one of us that would play their game. The funny part is, as hard as they have tried to dumb us down, we are still awakening, still arising and there is NOTHING they can do about it now. In the end, their kind will fade away.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Disturbing thing my wife came across last night. She is an ASL translator for deaf students at a local college. In a class the professor mentioned Obama for whatever reason while it was her teamer's turn. Instead of spelling it as is common for names when using ASL she used a sign of making an O then the sign for God. My wife said it actually made her nauseous when she saw it.
It amazes me the treatment this clown gets from the sheeple. The guys had a million red flags out there for anyone to find before he got elected but everyone ignored them and bought the MSM spin. The great irony is he basically ran against Bush and is now Bush 2.0, still shocks me how many don't see it and are in the tank for him. At least many have woken up however and are realizing the BS they were sold.
How dare you call obama a clown!
I like clowns.
Because you are one. I are one too!
¤=[Post Update]=¤
are goverment is a complete joke, everybody and i mean everybody is disgusted with the way things are done in america and there will be a revolution here you watch.
Yeah but it won't come until after the collapse. No one believes this is happening.
They won't be convinced until they are out of work, home, and food. It is rapidly approaching.
Charlie Pecos
11th March 2011, 20:10
Disturbing thing my wife came across last night. She is an ASL translator for deaf students at a local college. In a class the professor mentioned Obama for whatever reason while it was her teamer's turn. Instead of spelling it as is common for names when using ASL she used a sign of making an O then the sign for God. My wife said it actually made her nauseous when she saw it.
It amazes me the treatment this clown gets from the sheeple. The guys had a million red flags out there for anyone to find before he got elected but everyone ignored them and bought the MSM spin. The great irony is he basically ran against Bush and is now Bush 2.0, still shocks me how many don't see it and are in the tank for him. At least many have woken up however and are realizing the BS they were sold.
Who were we supposed to vote for? McCain? The guy didn't want the job! The only real choice we had was Obama, and it was a horrible choice. Let's say that we did elect McCain, we would still have the same Bush policies we have under Obama. Nothing would be different. How long have we been voting for the lesser of two evils? There is no choice when this is the standard. Both candidates are vetted members of the illuminati or whatever you want to call them. There is an agenda and it has nothing to do with democrat or republican. When Americans realize this en mass, their game will truly be over and they had better find a good hiding place. No politician will be safe.
shybastid
12th March 2011, 04:03
I'll stick with Avalon friends for a while. Don't mind me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YZpbYqOw4o
You people have a good heart.
Wookie
12th March 2011, 06:32
Could be that Obama is molting or shedding his skin and needs some alone time away from prying eyes.
Peaceful Journeys Wookie
Lord Sidious
12th March 2011, 06:38
I'll stick with Avalon friends for a while. Don't mind me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YZpbYqOw4o
You people have a good heart.
Here it is.
Lost Soul
13th March 2011, 00:59
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
IMHO, when the country was founded. We were ultimately started by the banks in England, the moneyed interests in Europe. If you go back and look at the politics surrounding the advent of the U.S. of A, you will find a lot of the same B.S. we endure today, politcally speaking. Left vs right paradigm. Moneyed interests deciding American policy. Elected officials having to vote for someone elses BS just so that their own bill gets passed. Politics has always been dirty. It has gotten progressively worse over several hundred years with the worst damage done in the
20th century. Up until that time, we actually had some decent leaders who vehemently resisted the banks taking over our government, the printing presses and our lives. They warned us again and again of the evils of allowing corporate interests into the political arena. Our leaders privatized the currency system and did away with the gold backed dollar. Where did that gold go? They did away with silver, same thing. Like Peter Joseph says, "the Federal Reserve is about as federal as Federal Express". Its a PRIVATE corporation.
How did we let this happen? Through trickery, the same trickery that has been used to bleed off almost all of our supposed constitutional rights. And the worst part of whole sham is we let it happen . "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Well, we did plenty of nothing, but it was easy for them. They distracted us with division at every turn. They gave us sports then television. I can't even begin to express how stupid sporting events are. (I know I'm not making any friends with this statement, but c'mon, take a look and you will find that it is true.) They distract and divide us. Celebrities serve the same purpose. We are so focused on what the rich and famous are doing, we can't possibly be bothered to monitor what our "elected" officials are doing. So long as we have our SUV's, our Big Mac's, and our flat screen hi def tv's, we don't care what happens. We took the bait. Now comes the pain.
I respectfully submit to the contrary. While this nation did start off on the right foot and its citizens enjoyed the greatest liberties and freedom of any society known in existence, the downward decline began in 1913 or shortly before that. First, J. D. Rockefeller convinced Maryland to change its laws with respects to corporations. Up to that change, corporations were granted charters that limited their existence which had to be in the interest of the public good. Once that public good expired, the charter would not be renewed and the corporation would be forced to dissolve and distribute its assets. Rockefeller realized that if he wanted to protect himself and his family from liability, he had to have a permanent, sustaining corporation. Thus he convinced (bribed perhaps?) Maryland to change its laws to allow corporations to exist into perpetuity. Corporation entities could now exist like a real person, hold title to property and provided immunity to its shareholders from corporate actions. The second and third step was when Rockefeller helped with the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Sixteenth Amendment which allowed for income tax. The change would be slow and people wouldn't notice. The IRS allowed for the expansion of the federal government. Prior to that, the federal government's income was limited to customs tax for the majority of its income.
Lord Sidious
13th March 2011, 01:42
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
IMHO, when the country was founded. We were ultimately started by the banks in England, the moneyed interests in Europe. If you go back and look at the politics surrounding the advent of the U.S. of A, you will find a lot of the same B.S. we endure today, politcally speaking. Left vs right paradigm. Moneyed interests deciding American policy. Elected officials having to vote for someone elses BS just so that their own bill gets passed. Politics has always been dirty. It has gotten progressively worse over several hundred years with the worst damage done in the
20th century. Up until that time, we actually had some decent leaders who vehemently resisted the banks taking over our government, the printing presses and our lives. They warned us again and again of the evils of allowing corporate interests into the political arena. Our leaders privatized the currency system and did away with the gold backed dollar. Where did that gold go? They did away with silver, same thing. Like Peter Joseph says, "the Federal Reserve is about as federal as Federal Express". Its a PRIVATE corporation.
How did we let this happen? Through trickery, the same trickery that has been used to bleed off almost all of our supposed constitutional rights. And the worst part of whole sham is we let it happen . "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Well, we did plenty of nothing, but it was easy for them. They distracted us with division at every turn. They gave us sports then television. I can't even begin to express how stupid sporting events are. (I know I'm not making any friends with this statement, but c'mon, take a look and you will find that it is true.) They distract and divide us. Celebrities serve the same purpose. We are so focused on what the rich and famous are doing, we can't possibly be bothered to monitor what our "elected" officials are doing. So long as we have our SUV's, our Big Mac's, and our flat screen hi def tv's, we don't care what happens. We took the bait. Now comes the pain.
I respectfully submit to the contrary. While this nation did start off on the right foot and its citizens enjoyed the greatest liberties and freedom of any society known in existence, the downward decline began in 1913 or shortly before that. First, J. D. Rockefeller convinced Maryland to change its laws with respects to corporations. Up to that change, corporations were granted charters that limited their existence which had to be in the interest of the public good. Once that public good expired, the charter would not be renewed and the corporation would be forced to dissolve and distribute its assets. Rockefeller realized that if he wanted to protect himself and his family from liability, he had to have a permanent, sustaining corporation. Thus he convinced (bribed perhaps?) Maryland to change its laws to allow corporations to exist into perpetuity. Corporation entities could now exist like a real person, hold title to property and provided immunity to its shareholders from corporate actions. The second and third step was when Rockefeller helped with the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Sixteenth Amendment which allowed for income tax. The change would be slow and people wouldn't notice. The IRS allowed for the expansion of the federal government. Prior to that, the federal government's income was limited to customs tax for the majority of its income.
The decline began somewhere around the early 1800's, that is IF the constitution was not a document setting up the payment of debts by the new nation and her citizens.
If it was, then it began before the shot heard around the world.
There are many things about American history that are absolutely Fascinating. Capital f because it is.
There are so many things about it that still, to this day remain unknown.
Some through disinterest, some through cover up, some through smear, but all the same, the history of this legendary place is not complete in the minds of men.
Charlie Pecos
13th March 2011, 02:10
As an American citizen, it matters not for whom you cast your vote, political "leaders" are bought and paid for by banks and corporate interests. Theirs' is the job of a puppet, a figure head- nothing more. Most Americans cannot understand this one simple fact. They have been brainwashed into the false left/right paradigm, where "divide and conquer" is easily applied. Obama does what his owners tell him to do, and in return he retires a very wealthy man. The same will be true for the next president- if we get that far. Makes one wonder, as blatant as the game is these days, if there will even be another American president.
When in your opinion did it start to go wrong for America?
cheers
K
IMHO, when the country was founded. We were ultimately started by the banks in England, the moneyed interests in Europe. If you go back and look at the politics surrounding the advent of the U.S. of A, you will find a lot of the same B.S. we endure today, politcally speaking. Left vs right paradigm. Moneyed interests deciding American policy. Elected officials having to vote for someone elses BS just so that their own bill gets passed. Politics has always been dirty. It has gotten progressively worse over several hundred years with the worst damage done in the
20th century. Up until that time, we actually had some decent leaders who vehemently resisted the banks taking over our government, the printing presses and our lives. They warned us again and again of the evils of allowing corporate interests into the political arena. Our leaders privatized the currency system and did away with the gold backed dollar. Where did that gold go? They did away with silver, same thing. Like Peter Joseph says, "the Federal Reserve is about as federal as Federal Express". Its a PRIVATE corporation.
How did we let this happen? Through trickery, the same trickery that has been used to bleed off almost all of our supposed constitutional rights. And the worst part of whole sham is we let it happen . "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Well, we did plenty of nothing, but it was easy for them. They distracted us with division at every turn. They gave us sports then television. I can't even begin to express how stupid sporting events are. (I know I'm not making any friends with this statement, but c'mon, take a look and you will find that it is true.) They distract and divide us. Celebrities serve the same purpose. We are so focused on what the rich and famous are doing, we can't possibly be bothered to monitor what our "elected" officials are doing. So long as we have our SUV's, our Big Mac's, and our flat screen hi def tv's, we don't care what happens. We took the bait. Now comes the pain.
I respectfully submit to the contrary. While this nation did start off on the right foot and its citizens enjoyed the greatest liberties and freedom of any society known in existence, the downward decline began in 1913 or shortly before that. First, J. D. Rockefeller convinced Maryland to change its laws with respects to corporations. Up to that change, corporations were granted charters that limited their existence which had to be in the interest of the public good. Once that public good expired, the charter would not be renewed and the corporation would be forced to dissolve and distribute its assets. Rockefeller realized that if he wanted to protect himself and his family from liability, he had to have a permanent, sustaining corporation. Thus he convinced (bribed perhaps?) Maryland to change its laws to allow corporations to exist into perpetuity. Corporation entities could now exist like a real person, hold title to property and provided immunity to its shareholders from corporate actions. The second and third step was when Rockefeller helped with the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Sixteenth Amendment which allowed for income tax. The change would be slow and people wouldn't notice. The IRS allowed for the expansion of the federal government. Prior to that, the federal government's income was limited to customs tax for the majority of its income.
The robber barons (banks) were exploiting the American people for profits long before JD Rockefeller did what he did. He was the best at it though.
Fred259
13th March 2011, 02:51
Folks, your Gold stolen by English, German and Swiss bankers is hidden in vaults under the runway of Zurich Airport. Go and get it!
Take the gold back to Fort Knox, but before you leave gather up the criminals, and lock the bas***** in the vaults under the runway, then throw away the keys.
If you do this not only do you get your gold back but you will be doing a great service for mankind.
Swanette
13th March 2011, 03:22
Folks, your Gold stolen by English, German and Swiss bankers is hidden in vaults under the runway of Zurich Airport. Go and get it!
Take the gold back to Fort Knox, but before you leave gather up the criminals, and lock the bas***** in the vaults under the runway, then throw away the keys.
If you do this not only do you get your gold back but you will be doing a great service for mankind.
I don't think it is in Zurich anymore either.....it's most likely off planet by now.
gripreaper
13th March 2011, 07:41
Folks, your Gold stolen by English, German and Swiss bankers is hidden in vaults under the runway of Zurich Airport. Go and get it!
Take the gold back to Fort Knox, but before you leave gather up the criminals, and lock the bas***** in the vaults under the runway, then throw away the keys.
If you do this not only do you get your gold back but you will be doing a great service for mankind.
I don't think it is in Zurich anymore either.....it's most likely off planet by now.
That's a good point. Consider that gold mining has been occurring on planet earth for hundreds of thousands of years. Some historians and archeologists who have found and dated the gold mines in Africa have confirmed this fact.
So, that's one boatload of gold. Where on earth is it all?
I sure wish we understood the alchemical nature of gold and why it is so popular, and not just Ormus or white powder gold.
jackovesk
23rd March 2011, 01:59
Congressman goes on media blitz to denounce illegal war of aggression against Libya
Steve Watson - March 22, 2011
Congressman Ron Paul made a sweep of television appearances yesterday to voice his strong opposition to the attack on Libya, and making it clear that the president is subverting US national sovereignty by bypassing Congress to engage in illegal acts of aggression.
Appearing on Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the Congressman pulled no punches when explaining why he believes Obama went to the UN for authority to drop bombs on Libya, rather than congress.
“I think he philosophically believes in one world government,” Paul stated.
“He wants to keep nudging us in that direction. I don’t believe he has a conviction that national sovereignty has any value. So therefore if they can diminish the Congress.” he continued.
“If he diminishes the Congress and he can get his authority from the United Nations then this enhances what he believes in. But he is not alone, the leadership in both parties has been nudging in that direction for a long time.” the Congressman added.
“To think of all the effort that the founders went to to make the Congress the most important body, that they are now the most willing to give up their prerogatives and give it to the executive branch and the judicial branch, and onward and onward. Our leaderships in the House as long as I’ve been there have always deferred to the executive branch.” he said.
Paul once again urged the American people to recognize the military incursion into Libya as a war of opportunity.
“It is unnecessary, it is wrong, it has nothing to do with national security, it has nothing to do with the defence of this country.” he said.
“I think there is more to do with it than just that. That may be their cover. It may be that oil is an important issue here. We didn’t go to Rwanda for humanitarian reasons, so I’m not to sure that oil might not be the real clincher here.”
Ron Paul on Freedom Watch: Obama Believes In One World Government , Not National Sovereignty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_J5icnh5js&feature=player_embedded
The Congressman also appeared on Cavuto on Fox and both Anderson Cooper and In The Arena on CNN, during which he made several salient points.
“I don’t think they are up front with this.” Paul told Elliot Spitzer.
“It is said we are going there for humanitarian reasons, but have you ever noticed around the world there are a lot of humanitarian problems. There is abuse of protesters all through the middle east right now but it’s being done by governments that we endorse – they are our “friendly” dictators.”
Watch the interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gddPZkI6HIo&feature=player_embedded
Paul posed the following question to Anderson Cooper concerning Colonel Gaddafi:
“Why was it that four or five years ago we decided that he was a reformed person and we would start trading with him again, after we knew he was a thug and he’s been a thug for forty something years?”
Watch the interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbpk2ggI-VY&feature=player_embedded
On Cavuto Paul again struck out at the continuous revolving door of dictators that the US military industrial complex is involved with, as well as highlighting the financial fallout of endless war.
“The American people are sick and tired of this. We are in trouble here. We’re spending money overseas, we blow up countries and then we have to rebuild them at the same time we can’t even build our own infrastructure.”
Watch the interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54DrcJDOqEA&feature=player_embedded
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-obama-moving-us-toward-one-world-government.html
PS - Ron Paul is the Real Deal - Ron Paul for President 2012 - Go Ron Paul, I too Love the TRUTH!
sygh
23rd March 2011, 15:12
Well done. Yes, President Obama by-passed Congress and went directly to the United Nations for an OK. This was absoluely intentional. There is no other way to look at it. He did write a letter to Congress, for what that's worth.
For those of us here, in the US, write your congressman. This is wrong. I understnad lives are at stake there in Libya; whoever, going to the UN instead of the Congress is impeachable.
king anthony
23rd March 2011, 15:21
...President Obama by-passed Congress and went directly to the United Nations for an OK.
While being President, he also has place in the United Nations; he currently holds two offices - not that this matters to the 'puppet masters'.
conk
23rd March 2011, 20:13
Ron Paul is one of the few true statesmen left in Congress. Sad indeed. I worry about him though. I'm afraid he may be "Paul Wellstoned" for speaking out.
Rocky_Shorz
23rd March 2011, 20:28
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
Pilgrim
23rd March 2011, 21:16
I am not an American, guys, I do not mean critisize you or your country, however, it seems to me, for some time, that "democracy" in the USA became just empty word. They drag you over and over in chain of neverending wars, where real people die again and again. They call that defending, implamenting, securing democracy, defending your country or pretending they do care about people of nations which suffer under dictators when they attack another country calling themselves liberators. Where are Obama´s promises? Where is that hope and change which he promised during his presidantial campaign? Sad, very sad, I do not take this man seriously at all any more. He continues where Bush Senior started. It stinks again in Lybia. It is so obvious, so emberrasing, meaningless. If they wanted to get rid of Gadaffi they could have done that 1000times whenever before. They do not go to Liberia, Ivory Coast, Rwanda, Kongo, they left Somalia. Oil, oil oil...the same story and who know what else they have on their agendas. I lived in socialistic country. Communists fulled my nation over 40 years till poeple had enough lies and went to the streets to make change which they dreamt for long time. Now, we are part of EU. Sorry, guys, this is not democracy either, it became technocracy in the hands of elite. We need change also in your country, guys, oversees, indeed, soon. We need the change in Europe, EU is dead too. We need the real change in this World and we need it NOw. We need many more brave men like him to reach that..
I am realy sick of this current world politics. I can not watch CNN (CNN World is tabloits) or BBC World ( tabloit style journalism too, it is sad what turned from fine journalism) news anymore. What they present is so rudiculus that it would become grotesque if matters discussed would not be serious.
I do not wnat to be negative, just expressing my current thought, believing in that change which we expect here in AF. Cheers,P.
PHARAOH
23rd March 2011, 21:26
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
I beg to differ, Rocky_Shorz. Democracy is mob rule. Democracy is a bastard word used for Evil purposes. How can we call america a democracy when we have no say or rights. We must carry our papers on us at all times in the form of drivers license. We are forced by our government to buy insurance or you cannot drive your car. You are forced by the government to buy home insurance. You are forced by the government to subject yourself and family to vaccinations. We no longer have the freedom of speech or expression. Remember saying the pledge "and to the "Republic" for which it stands".... Now I ask you, what would Obama do if 1 million Americans show up at the white house lawn demanding he step down?
Revere
23rd March 2011, 21:42
We can never get our Government under control until we get the Corporations out of it. We are run to make money for the PTB behind the government. We are shot top to bottom. Presidency, Congress and the Supreme Court....done.
Not until we forget parties rise up in mass and say no more to all of it will we have real change. Ron Paul, forget about it...dust in the wind. All are guilty by association and are just game players. The Reset button some day... somehow is the only chance! Sorry.
Peace,
-R-
Rocky_Shorz
23rd March 2011, 21:57
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control. Sure we're a mess, but would you rather be living anywhere else?
If you don't think we have the right of freedom or speech or expression, then you haven't been reading anything I have written lately.
sure you can just sweep all the less fortunate onto an island and turn your back, no medical treatments or food
a society is judged on how they take care of the needy, not how rich it is, morally America is very broke that way, almost a failure.
you complain about large corporations because they programmed you to fight what is right...
You my friend, are doing the work for them
I am not a Democrat or a Republican
I am an American, from the bloodline of Washington
so you really do have a choice, you can keep fighting for TPB, or can wake up and stand beside us against them...
Rocky_Shorz
23rd March 2011, 22:08
and for those of you who don't see the manipulation going on inside of Ron Paul, he needs protection, PTB are pulling out all the stops to keep the Fed Reserve in place...
risveglio
23rd March 2011, 22:11
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control...
I have a really hard time agreeing with this. I don't see much difference between Obama and his cousin George.
Fred Steeves
23rd March 2011, 22:34
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control. Sure we're a mess, but would you rather be living anywhere else?
Hi Rocky, I must admit I'm rather stunned at that statement, to say the least. Maybe I'm missing something here, so help me understand.
After the W. debacle, are we occupying, bombing, or infiltrating more, or less nations?
Are we more or less in debt to the Federal Reserve?
Is Guantanomo still open?
Does the Patriot Act still stand?
How bout unemployment, better?
Inflation?
Dangerous and sleezy airport security, for our safety?
Have chem trails stopped?
Are the police now more polite? Less abuse and speed traps?
Are we now less hamstrung by the web of rules and regulations?
Have vaccines subsided?
Do we have more say so over our health care?
Is the stock market shooting up because the economy is all better, or because of continuous shots of monotized adrenaline from you know who?
Are we no longer monitered?
Can we no longer be held in detention for an indefinate period of time, without a lawyer, just with the label of domestic terrorist? Whatever they deem that to mean when convenient?
O.K. that's enough for now, I could go on. Please explain now how TPTB feel they have suddenly lost control because of this man Barry Soetero?
Thanks and Cheers,
Fred S.
I_Am
23rd March 2011, 22:55
Think about another USA, that decided not to go to war after 911, but instead said: "enough of this!" and put their money into changing their dependency in oil - developing new car technologies and energy production...
Now, ten years later, the world most certainly would have become a completely different place, wouldn't it?
Just imagine...
Rocky_Shorz
23rd March 2011, 23:24
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control...
I have a really hard time agreeing with this. I don't see much difference between Obama and his cousin George.
you won't see a difference as long as Bankers are running our country
risveglio
23rd March 2011, 23:42
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control...
I have a really hard time agreeing with this. I don't see much difference between Obama and his cousin George.
you won't see a difference as long as Bankers are running our country
Well Ron Paul was the only man talking about the bankters but he sees the ideal direction for the country to be completely opposite from Obama's change. I am having a very hard time seeing how his victory showed the PTB that they were no longer in control. I think his victory showed they were very much in control cause they got everyone to believe he was not just another puppet, that somehow he was different.
king anthony
23rd March 2011, 23:47
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
Dictatorship: the appearance of one - 'same as' - Communism: the government (the appearance of the few) control corporations - 'same as' - Democracy: the corporations (the non-appearance of the few) control the government = (in theory) 51% of the population can take away the rights of 49% = corporate policy rules the people as they have been made into 'law' (voluntary compliance by the many) = Dictatorship (the CEO or president) controls through policy and currency.
Republic: the rule of all = 99% of the population cannot take away the rights of 1%.
By the said standard(s) in the quote and below, then the people truly have (and will have) what they deserve!?
Is democracy not a bad word? What does this say of those who support it?
Rocky_Shorz
23rd March 2011, 23:50
I said Democracy wasn't a dirty word, one day I hope we live under one...
Lord Sidious
24th March 2011, 00:30
We can never get our Government under control until we get the Corporations out of it. We are run to make money for the PTB behind the government. We are shot top to bottom. Presidency, Congress and the Supreme Court....done.
Not until we forget parties rise up in mass and say no more to all of it will we have real change. Ron Paul, forget about it...dust in the wind. All are guilty by association and are just game players. The Reset button some day... somehow is the only chance! Sorry.
Peace,
-R-
I would say that any talk of changing or fixing the system is not smart.
Think of it like a house, this house is in such bad condition, that no matter what you do, it will eventually be condemned.
The only thing to do is demolish and build a new one.
Same with the system.
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control. Sure we're a mess, but would you rather be living anywhere else?
If you don't think we have the right of freedom or speech or expression, then you haven't been reading anything I have written lately.
sure you can just sweep all the less fortunate onto an island and turn your back, no medical treatments or food
a society is judged on how they take care of the needy, not how rich it is, morally America is very broke that way, almost a failure.
you complain about large corporations because they programmed you to fight what is right...
You my friend, are doing the work for them
I am not a Democrat or a Republican
I am an American, from the bloodline of Washington
so you really do have a choice, you can keep fighting for TPB, or can wake up and stand beside us against them...
Obama is one of them, bloodline one of them too.
Oh and you wanna know about freedom of expression in the west now? There are certain things you can't say in public. In some countries, you get arrested, in others, like America, they just use the media to execute you.
I said Democracy wasn't a dirty word, one day I hope we live under one...
You do live under a democracy, although you are meant to have a republic.
Democracy is mob rule, you can make any law you like, without restriction, with 50% +1 vote.
Wanna kill speeders? No worries, we can do that.
I saw an interview with Jesse Ventura once. He made the point that America is great, you get one choice more at election time than the communists did.
On another interview, Andrew Napolitano said to him that the democrats (scamocrats) and republicans (scamicans) are left and right wing of the big government party.
If anyone REALLY believes they are different, they need their heads read.
It is the same in all western nations, there is no diversity in politics, as those who control don't want it.
jackovesk
24th March 2011, 00:30
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
Unfortunately Rocky,
Democracy is like 2 wolves saying who's for dinner!
http://ts3.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=719068662198&id=64a0feb30088ed2b419d77369a6f4534&url=http%3a%2f%2f2.bp.blogspot.com%2f_zyJ-1owDUt0%2fSwYWLUR0_iI%2fAAAAAAAAAUc%2fkmxHEe9J3XE%2fs400%2fwolves_fighting2.jpg
You get to elect a Republican or Democratic 'Tapped Puppet' that's all...
Democracy is a 'Scam' it's really all about the Party for the Party and Guess What? They Don't give a 'SHYTE' about what the voting public thinks!
We are all just the cannon fodder for their 'Agenda'!
What part of 'Un-Constitutional Govt', don't the American people understand? It's the same all over the world! Democracy has been 'Hijacked' by the PTB!
The sooner the people 'Wake Up' to this 'Fact' the better..!
Rocky_Shorz
24th March 2011, 00:34
funny you mention Jesse, I know him from before he was Governor...
did you know it is possible to drink a pitcher of beer in under 20 seconds? ;)
king anthony
24th March 2011, 00:41
I said Democracy wasn't a dirty word, one day I hope we live under one...
The United States already does, and this is what has been imposed worldwide; you already have that which you hope for.
Rocky_Shorz
24th March 2011, 01:09
naaa all of our candidates are chosen by the powers, not the people
a grass roots organization started and was immediately changed to corporate controlled using the media to bring out their spins...
Tea partiers were punked by TPTB
Did any of you notice what is going on in Canada?
Canada's three opposition parties say they plan to topple the Conservative government this week, in a vote on the budget or a no-confidence motion.
The no-confidence vote, due on Friday, stems from a ruling that the government has acted in contempt of Parliament by failing to disclose spending costs.
A vote on the government's budget plan is expected on Thursday or Friday.
A defeat for PM Stephen Harper on either vote would trigger Canada's fourth federal election in seven years.
An election would probably take place on 2 or 9 May.
The Bloc Quebecois and New Democratic Party (NDP) said on Wednesday they would back a motion of no-confidence in the minority Conservative government from the Liberals.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said: "This government has lost the confidence of Canadians."...
story link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12842902)
why do you think this is big news in Britain?
Setras
24th March 2011, 01:15
in truth though we do need globalisation. to work together, to move forward as one, to evolve toogether, but it is a question who is running or trying to control it!
Lord Sidious
24th March 2011, 01:23
funny you mention Jesse, I know him from before he was Governor...
did you know it is possible to drink a pitcher of beer in under 20 seconds? ;)
I loved it when he was with the WWF, both as a wrestler and general troublemaker.
Win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat.
How do you beat that?
I would love to meet him and thank him for all the entertainment I got from him and now, all the activism he does.
He has a backbone, not a wishbone and that isn't so common with ''celebrities'' these days, unless the topic is politically correct.
modwiz
24th March 2011, 01:43
funny you mention Jesse, I know him from before he was Governor...
did you know it is possible to drink a pitcher of beer in under 20 seconds? ;)
I loved it when he was with the WWF, both as a wrestler and general troublemaker.
Win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat.
How do you beat that?
I would love to meet him and thank him for all the entertainment I got from him and now, all the activism he does.
He has a backbone, not a wishbone and that isn't so common with ''celebrities'' these days, unless the topic is politically correct.
:offtopic: In one of Jesse's conspiracy shows he meets Duncan O'Finoan in a parking lot. He made Duncan look small, which he is not.
Jesse must be on big man.
T Smith
24th March 2011, 01:50
I am not an American, guys, I do not mean critisize you or your country, however, it seems to me, for some time, that "democracy" in the USA became just empty word. They drag you over and over in chain of neverending wars, where real people die again and again. They call that defending, implamenting, securing democracy, defending your country or pretending they do care about people of nations which suffer under dictators when they attack another country calling themselves liberators. Where are Obama´s promises? Where is that hope and change which he promised during his presidantial campaign? Sad, very sad, I do not take this man seriously at all any more. He continues where Bush Senior started. It stinks again in Lybia. It is so obvious, so emberrasing, meaningless. If they wanted to get rid of Gadaffi they could have done that 1000times whenever before. They do not go to Liberia, Ivory Coast, Rwanda, Kongo, they left Somalia. Oil, oil oil...the same story and who know what else they have on their agendas. I lived in socialistic country. Communists fulled my nation over 40 years till poeple had enough lies and went to the streets to make change which they dreamt for long time. Now, we are part of EU. Sorry, guys, this is not democracy either, it became technocracy in the hands of elite. We need change also in your country, guys, oversees, indeed, soon. We need the change in Europe, EU is dead too. We need the real change in this World and we need it NOw. We need many more brave men like him to reach that..
I am realy sick of this current world politics. I can not watch CNN (CNN World is tabloits) or BBC World ( tabloit style journalism too, it is sad what turned from fine journalism) news anymore. What they present is so rudiculus that it would become grotesque if matters discussed would not be serious.
I do not wnat to be negative, just expressing my current thought, believing in that change which we expect here in AF. Cheers,P.
You need not apologize for criticizing America. America was sacked a long time ago. Congress is only ceremonial. None of the wars you cite are legal, per our constitution. The controlling power employs the propaganda you describe and fights in the name of America, but it is only employing American assets... it is not America.
T Smith
24th March 2011, 01:56
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control.
I don't follow what you mean here at all... Did you really mean to say this?
T Smith
24th March 2011, 02:04
I said Democracy wasn't a dirty word, one day I hope we live under one...
Democracy = two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. Sucks if you're the sheep.
Republic = individual rights protected by law, fashioned by representation.
I think you may be confusing democracy with a republican form of government?
jackovesk
24th March 2011, 03:33
You Tube Admits To Freezing View Count On Biden Impeachment Video...
By both Biden’s and Obama’s own admissions, they should be removed from office. Period!
The video (below) dates from 2007 and shows Biden, then preparing for a presidential run, appearing on the Chris Matthews show on MSNBC.
In the video Biden is asked if he sticks by comments that bombing Iranian interests without Congressional approval would be an impeachable offense, to which he replies he absolutely does.
The video was posted at the top of The Drudge Report earlier today, a website that conservatively receives 36 million visits per day, making it the most highly ranked news website on the web.
Under the headline Could Obama be Impeached over Libya? Let’s ask Biden, the video has been drawing thousands of hits as viewers have drawn the comparison to the subversion of Congressional authority by Biden and Obama via US involvement in UN sanctioned attacks on pro-Gaddafi forces and buildings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adpa5kYUhCA&feature=player_embedded
Obama recieving his Nobel Peace Prize! WTF! Give it back you Hypocrite!
http://images.politico.com/global/politico44/110322_obama_nobel1_522_regular.jpg
http://www.prisonplanet.com/you-tube-admits-to-freezing-viewcount-on-biden-impeachment-video.html
ulli
24th March 2011, 12:56
What's needed is a world parliament,
elected by delegates from every country on earth.
And those delegates have to be picked by the people,
not the media, nor corporations.
It will take a while.
First comes the idea, the vision...the debate
The rest follows...
risveglio
24th March 2011, 13:02
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
ulli
24th March 2011, 13:45
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
Not if it really reflects the will of the people of the earth.
The UN was always too removed...
a large part of the world population hardly know of its existence.
maybe it is only a matter of reforming the UN,
with a decent set of checks and balances...
While events like tsunamis happen which affect more than one country
there ought to be a body that can oversee and coordinate the response.
risveglio
24th March 2011, 14:47
No Government will ever reflect the will of the people. It is something the founders of the USA tried to tell us over and over again. It is why our intend was to have a limited government with checks and balances. Any form or World Government will just be selective oppression on a larger scale.
Limor Wolf
24th March 2011, 18:08
in truth though we do need globalisation. to work together, to move forward as one, to evolve toogether, but it is a question who is running or trying to control it!
Maybe it is UNITY that we want and not globalisation.it is all the above you mentioned Setras,but allowing the differences of nationality and cultures,those of earth and beyond,to maintain their individuality,their characters,and free spirit by respecting and cooperating with everyone else on the basis of Holographic society.
This will lead to a creation of a variegated carpet wich have not one head and no controlling mechanism.
Bill Ryan was clearly explaining it once in a chat :
"A holographic organization ( as far as I understand it!) is when there's no pyramid top-down control structure. It's a flat network that still keeps going even if half of it is suddenly removed.
That's the analogy with a hologram, which still works fine even if it's cut in half. Everyone is valuable and no-one is indispensable. So it can't be stopped by (e.g.) taking over a management level near the top
John: A holographic structure mirrors the structure of reality, even as physicists are understanding it: "The whole is contained in each of the parts.
Bill Ryan: A holographic community (in my view) is like a beehive in which there are all kinds of autonomous projects that spontaneously start up and no-one person is masterminding it all.
It needs co-ordination (the function) but not a status-role (a co-ordinator with a fixed position in the organization).
Bill Ryan: If the networking structure is in place and there's enough energy, commitment and expertise there, then management isn't needed apart from light co-ordination now and then.
Holographic organizations I think are related to morphic resonance (Sheldrake) - people learn quickly and start to think really together in synergistic ways…without losing individuality."
* Thanks to 'dancing particle' for the emphasis and the quotation the chat
Flash
25th March 2011, 02:39
naaa all of our candidates are chosen by the powers, not the people
a grass roots organization started and was immediately changed to corporate controlled using the media to bring out their spins...
Tea partiers were punked by TPTB
Did any of you notice what is going on in Canada?
Canada's three opposition parties say they plan to topple the Conservative government this week, in a vote on the budget or a no-confidence motion.
The no-confidence vote, due on Friday, stems from a ruling that the government has acted in contempt of Parliament by failing to disclose spending costs.
A vote on the government's budget plan is expected on Thursday or Friday.
A defeat for PM Stephen Harper on either vote would trigger Canada's fourth federal election in seven years.
An election would probably take place on 2 or 9 May.
The Bloc Quebecois and New Democratic Party (NDP) said on Wednesday they would back a motion of no-confidence in the minority Conservative government from the Liberals.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said: "This government has lost the confidence of Canadians."...
story link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12842902)
why do you think this is big news in Britain?
Please Rocky, if you know why, tell me.
Humble Janitor
25th March 2011, 05:32
Ron Paul is one of the few true statesmen left in Congress. Sad indeed. I worry about him though. I'm afraid he may be "Paul Wellstoned" for speaking out.
Only if people like you send that energy his way. Send THE love and THE light instead!
Hate to admit it but he's right here.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
naaa all of our candidates are chosen by the powers, not the people
a grass roots organization started and was immediately changed to corporate controlled using the media to bring out their spins...
Tea partiers were punked by TPTB
Did any of you notice what is going on in Canada?
Canada's three opposition parties say they plan to topple the Conservative government this week, in a vote on the budget or a no-confidence motion.
The no-confidence vote, due on Friday, stems from a ruling that the government has acted in contempt of Parliament by failing to disclose spending costs.
A vote on the government's budget plan is expected on Thursday or Friday.
A defeat for PM Stephen Harper on either vote would trigger Canada's fourth federal election in seven years.
An election would probably take place on 2 or 9 May.
The Bloc Quebecois and New Democratic Party (NDP) said on Wednesday they would back a motion of no-confidence in the minority Conservative government from the Liberals.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said: "This government has lost the confidence of Canadians."...
story link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12842902)
why do you think this is big news in Britain?
Because Harper is about to get royally ****-canned like Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were?
And for good reason. Harper is one of the few brown-nosers left from the G.W Bush era (Blair being the other one).
jackovesk
25th March 2011, 08:46
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
Not if it really reflects the will of the people of the earth.
The UN was always too removed...
a large part of the world population hardly know of its existence.
maybe it is only a matter of reforming the UN,
with a decent set of checks and balances...
While events like tsunamis happen which affect more than one country
there ought to be a body that can oversee and coordinate the response.
Agreed risveglio,
Why do so many of you get so confused between a positive spiritual 'Collective Consciousnes' and our amazing cultural diferences and identities and a One World Govt?
I don't and never will understand the New Age propaganda which I believe has been severely infiltrated by the PTB!
It's not Rocket Science folks...
Collective Consciousness - Oneness with Onself & the Universe - Individual Identities all across the world with a Spritual Connection of Oneness...
At the moment with all the Major Disasters going on around the planet it is only strengthening our Spiritual Connection with each other on a daily basis. And is having an uncanny effect of exposing coverups and corruptions aswell...Coincedence? Yes I think so..!
We don't need a World Govt. we just need Honest Govts!
Fire Dragon
25th March 2011, 09:29
Ron Paul: Obama Moving Us Toward "One World Government"!
This is the statement that tears me up at this moment in life,,, one hand of me wants one world government, we are all one, of this life here, all equal, i want to beleive we can do it, save earth, save civalisation, all live together.
the other hand keeps telling, we are just not ready for it yet, if it is going to happen, it has to happen of everyones free will. Forcing it as seems to be the case now, with TPTB, or whoever is meddling in earths affairs, will just devide us. One world, one governing body we can all agree on is not yet here, we are not ready, we can only get there by seeing an example of structures that do work, which we havent arrived at yet, as a consensus. We still need more time to evolve to get there, no one can force this, forcing this is what situation we are in right now, they are forcing this, we are not ready, this is the friction between us....
This and our dislike of their evil ways of forcing us to accept it.
Let us evolve there naturally please, this is my prayer.
ulli
25th March 2011, 09:45
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
Not if it really reflects the will of the people of the earth.
The UN was always too removed...
a large part of the world population hardly know of its existence.
maybe it is only a matter of reforming the UN,
with a decent set of checks and balances...
While events like tsunamis happen which affect more than one country
there ought to be a body that can oversee and coordinate the response.
Agreed risveglio,
Why do so many of you get so confused between a positive spiritual 'Collective Consciousnes' and our amazing cultural diferences and identities and a One World Govt?
I don't and never will understand the New Age propaganda which I believe has been severely infiltrated by the PTB!
It's not Rocket Science folks...
Collective Consciousness - Oneness with Onself & the Universe - Individual Identities all across the world with a Spritual Connection of Oneness...
At the moment with all the Major Disasters going on around the planet it is only strengthening our Spiritual Connection with each other on a daily basis. And is having an uncanny effect of exposing coverups and corruptions aswell...Coincedence? Yes I think so..!
We don't need a World Govt. we just need Honest Govts!
Not every one world government idea is the result of NWO propaganda...
there are some common sense options as well.
Honest government is a given.
If such a thing can exist at a national level then why not at an international level also?
So, without a world govenment in place which nation would be the one to represent our planet
as a whole?
Because there will be official contact one day, and friendly relations with star nations.
Then someone has to deal with the ET issues.
But I guess it will have to be Australia then, sigh....
W.C.
25th March 2011, 10:15
Americans don't need other nations criticising them -- The Americans criticize themselves more than enough. Besides, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, well, at least after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
ulli
25th March 2011, 10:20
Americans don't need other nations criticising them -- The Americans criticize themselves more than enough. Besides, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, well, at least after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
Are you suggesting the US to become the representative nation on earth? And NOT Australia??
Black Panther
25th March 2011, 11:05
I said Democracy wasn't a dirty word, one day I hope we live under one...
Democracy = two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. Sucks if you're the sheep.
Republic = individual rights protected by law, fashioned by representation.
I think you may be confusing democracy with a republican form of government?
The term democracy comes from the Greek dēmokratía: "rule of the people".
It's just most of the people don't know real democracy doesn't exist,
although they call it democracy.
Rocky_Shorz
25th March 2011, 18:37
funny you mention Jesse, I know him from before he was Governor...
did you know it is possible to drink a pitcher of beer in under 20 seconds? ;)
I loved it when he was with the WWF, both as a wrestler and general troublemaker.
Win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat.
How do you beat that?
I would love to meet him and thank him for all the entertainment I got from him and now, all the activism he does.
He has a backbone, not a wishbone and that isn't so common with ''celebrities'' these days, unless the topic is politically correct.
being a Navy Seal has much to do with that...
Rocky_Shorz
25th March 2011, 18:44
naaa all of our candidates are chosen by the powers, not the people
a grass roots organization started and was immediately changed to corporate controlled using the media to bring out their spins...
Tea partiers were punked by TPTB
Did any of you notice what is going on in Canada?
Canada's three opposition parties say they plan to topple the Conservative government this week, in a vote on the budget or a no-confidence motion.
The no-confidence vote, due on Friday, stems from a ruling that the government has acted in contempt of Parliament by failing to disclose spending costs.
A vote on the government's budget plan is expected on Thursday or Friday.
A defeat for PM Stephen Harper on either vote would trigger Canada's fourth federal election in seven years.
An election would probably take place on 2 or 9 May.
The Bloc Quebecois and New Democratic Party (NDP) said on Wednesday they would back a motion of no-confidence in the minority Conservative government from the Liberals.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said: "This government has lost the confidence of Canadians."...
story link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12842902)
why do you think this is big news in Britain?
Please Rocky, if you know why, tell me.
20% of Canada's Gross goes to British bankers, not the Queen... ;)
I think it is time she changes that since her picture is on all the money, she has the right...
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Pharaoh,
the day Obama became president was the day PTB realized they were no longer in control.
I don't follow what you mean here at all... Did you really mean to say this?
yep...
Hillary was not meant to be 2nd, 3rd 4th 5th... ;)
Rocky_Shorz
25th March 2011, 18:47
a Government of the people needs both Conservatives and Liberals equally divided, they stand apart on opinions but are meant to work on going forward after the votes are counted, these egotistic politicians need to stop crying and decide if they want to be part of a real government, "We the People" have had enough.
Revere
25th March 2011, 19:42
W.C.-
Americans don't need other nations criticising them -- The Americans criticize themselves more than enough. Besides, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, well, at least after they have exhausted all other possibilities
OH THAT IS A GOOD ONE!
After reading it I looked over to see who wrote it. The remark was so funny that when I saw W.C I expected to read W.C Fields. Not that Churchill wasn’t a quippy one.
Hey, at least we Americans don't stop trying. Who knows maybe we will get it right....hmm?
-R-
T Smith
25th March 2011, 22:03
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
Not if it really reflects the will of the people of the earth.
The UN was always too removed...
a large part of the world population hardly know of its existence.
maybe it is only a matter of reforming the UN,
with a decent set of checks and balances...
While events like tsunamis happen which affect more than one country
there ought to be a body that can oversee and coordinate the response.
Agreed risveglio,
Why do so many of you get so confused between a positive spiritual 'Collective Consciousnes' and our amazing cultural diferences and identities and a One World Govt?
I don't and never will understand the New Age propaganda which I believe has been severely infiltrated by the PTB!
It's not Rocket Science folks...
Collective Consciousness - Oneness with Onself & the Universe - Individual Identities all across the world with a Spritual Connection of Oneness...
At the moment with all the Major Disasters going on around the planet it is only strengthening our Spiritual Connection with each other on a daily basis. And is having an uncanny effect of exposing coverups and corruptions aswell...Coincedence? Yes I think so..!
We don't need a World Govt. we just need Honest Govts!
Not every one world government idea is the result of NWO propaganda...
there are some common sense options as well.
Honest government is a given.
If such a thing can exist at a national level then why not at an international level also?
So, without a world govenment in place which nation would be the one to represent our planet
as a whole?
Because there will be official contact one day, and friendly relations with star nations.
Then someone has to deal with the ET issues.
But I guess it will have to be Australia then, sigh....
Does honest government even exist on a national level?
ulli
25th March 2011, 22:24
Sorry but I think a World Parliament is a horrible idea. The UN has done little to no good since its inception and a world parliament would just be more of the same.
Not if it really reflects the will of the people of the earth.
The UN was always too removed...
a large part of the world population hardly know of its existence.
maybe it is only a matter of reforming the UN,
with a decent set of checks and balances...
While events like tsunamis happen which affect more than one country
there ought to be a body that can oversee and coordinate the response.
Agreed risveglio,
Why do so many of you get so confused between a positive spiritual 'Collective Consciousnes' and our amazing cultural diferences and identities and a One World Govt?
I don't and never will understand the New Age propaganda which I believe has been severely infiltrated by the PTB!
It's not Rocket Science folks...
Collective Consciousness - Oneness with Onself & the Universe - Individual Identities all across the world with a Spritual Connection of Oneness...
At the moment with all the Major Disasters going on around the planet it is only strengthening our Spiritual Connection with each other on a daily basis. And is having an uncanny effect of exposing coverups and corruptions aswell...Coincedence? Yes I think so..!
We don't need a World Govt. we just need Honest Govts!
Not every one world government idea is the result of NWO propaganda...
there are some common sense options as well.
Honest government is a given.
If such a thing can exist at a national level then why not at an international level also?
So, without a world govenment in place which nation would be the one to represent our planet
as a whole?
Because there will be official contact one day, and friendly relations with star nations.
Then someone has to deal with the ET issues.
But I guess it will have to be Australia then, sigh....
Does honest government even exist on a national level?
With just under 200 nations there is quite a variety...
I'm not sure which country has the most honest government, but that might be worth investigating.
I know in Venezuela no corrupt official has ever been put on trial,
which led to the election of Hugo Chavez.
On the other hand, in Costa Rica two former presidents were imprisoned for accepting bribes.
Also they have cameras in the Congress....one can watch all sessions on TV.
On the whole it must depend on how boyant and educated the electorate is.
There is a saying that people get the government they deserve,
provided they have fair election processes.
It's a learning process for all involved.
W.C.
26th March 2011, 01:47
Americans don't need other nations criticising them -- The Americans criticize themselves more than enough. Besides, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, well, at least after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
Are you suggesting the US to become the representative nation on earth? And NOT Australia??
I was paraphrasing Churchill's satirical comments, which I still find amusing in a sense today.
Representative nation on Earth? I don't believe so. Each nation should be respected enough to represent themselves -- but so long as societies have been numbed and the focus of the puppeteers is the removal of rights, the legislating against individual freedoms, and an unending strive for dominance and power through their many actions, no nation will be safe or respected enough to pave their own way.
The paraphrased quote says America, as this is where America has been positioned in the world -- the top, pretty much -- where America acts, the rest of the world either follows suit or stays out of the way but for the odd 'strongly worded statement'.
If a revolution, and I mean a true revolution were to take place in America, the face of the world would change -- but it must be done precisely and with the right people ready to take charge, as America has many opportunistic ally's/enemies the puppeteers can utilise in just such a scenario... where America's own fail-safes like the fema camps aren't enough.
Still, on the more light-hearted and brighter side, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted. People will only take so much.
W.C.-
Americans don't need other nations criticising them -- The Americans criticize themselves more than enough. Besides, America can always be counted on to do the right thing, well, at least after they have exhausted all other possibilities
OH THAT IS A GOOD ONE!
After reading it I looked over to see who wrote it. The remark was so funny that when I saw W.C I expected to read W.C Fields. Not that Churchill wasn’t a quippy one.
Hey, at least we Americans don't stop trying. Who knows maybe we will get it right....hmm?
-R-
The day may dawn... it is not America's war alone, but every country whose path to betterment has been subverted by the ideals of the certain groups of a few. I think that when the occasion permits, the Americans will find they have many friends yet.
Ron Paul is an exceptional story of individualism where it counts. He appears to be a revolutionary in that he holds ideas the founding fathers of America once held. That one sentiment alone speaks volumes on the current state of affairs.
It would be something to see him reach the level of President. However, it would be safe to say the groups of puppeteers, via the media, the vote counters and co. would remove as much chance as possible of such an occurrence taking place. And if, if he was to take the office, I would honestly fear for the mans life. I imagine a very similar sentiment is one running through Mr Paul's mind as he considers the Presidency.
Lost Soul
26th March 2011, 02:33
Estados Unidos was never a democracy. It has always be a republic with elected representatives (even though we're not allowed to choose who can run because everyone who runs shouldn't be voted into office).
Snowbird
26th March 2011, 13:56
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
Rocky, we are not a Democracy (whatever that means). We are a Republic. Our country was formed as a Republic.
A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, retain supreme control over the government. The term is generally also understood to describe a government where most decisions are made with reference to established laws, rather than the discretion of a head of state, and therefore monarchy is today generally considered to be incompatible with being a republic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
Snowbird
26th March 2011, 14:39
There are still thinking and caring representatives in Congress and in the mainstream. Its just that there are so few in Washington D.C. who are willing to stand up and speak out.
I hope that impeachment proceedings are started. Obama has shown our country that he does not represent the United States of America, but the Corporation of the United States.
Kucinich says Obama "crossed the line," calls attacks on Libya an "indisputable" impeachable offense
Kucinich said that Mr. Obama's actions were unconstitutional, according to the president's own constitutional interpretation. He cited a 2007 interview in which Mr. Obama said, "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20045508-503544.html
Michael Moore To Obama: Return Your Nobel Peace Prize
Michael Moore About Obama: May I suggest a 50-mile evacuation zone around Obama's Nobel Peace Prize?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/20/michael_moore_to_obama_return_your_nobel_peace_prize.html
http://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/49232690192465920
Rocky_Shorz
26th March 2011, 20:19
as long as we are under the "REPUBLICAN's AGENDA" which means we are at War, the President has the authority to step into whatever conflict deemed necessary for the spread of Democracy throughout the world...
DEMOCRACY is not a bad word...
It is what America stands for, along with all that want it...
Rocky, we are not a Democracy (whatever that means). We are a Republic. Our country was formed as a Republic.
A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, retain supreme control over the government. The term is generally also understood to describe a government where most decisions are made with reference to established laws, rather than the discretion of a head of state, and therefore monarchy is today generally considered to be incompatible with being a republic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
If you want to see the party I am voting for America it will understand these truths... Power to the people... (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10845-Avalon-The-gathering-of-33-Bloodlines...&p=184447&viewfull=1#post184447)
You see, I am looking back to the Beginning of the RED WHITE BLUE Party
Red to remind us of the Coats we used to wear, and Blue to where we are heading towards truth and Peace for everyone in this world. White is for the strong hearts and faith holding this country together.
The head doesn't have any experience, knowledge of Politics or money, but plenty of Spirit to get the job done... ;)
Lord Sidious
27th March 2011, 06:46
funny you mention Jesse, I know him from before he was Governor...
did you know it is possible to drink a pitcher of beer in under 20 seconds? ;)
I loved it when he was with the WWF, both as a wrestler and general troublemaker.
Win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat.
How do you beat that?
I would love to meet him and thank him for all the entertainment I got from him and now, all the activism he does.
He has a backbone, not a wishbone and that isn't so common with ''celebrities'' these days, unless the topic is politically correct.
being a Navy Seal has much to do with that...
Probably true man, probably true.
Rozzy
27th March 2011, 20:08
Liar right from the start
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_RWHiC7K3k
Pilgrim
27th March 2011, 20:17
I do not even bother to watch this man any more.....:( wasting time. We know he is fraud and liar.
Lord Sidious
27th March 2011, 20:41
Liar right from the start
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_RWHiC7K3k
That should work.
noprophet
27th March 2011, 20:42
The entire political system is a facade. Are we really so surprised anymore?
loveandgratitude
27th March 2011, 21:12
How long does it take for people to wake up.....................Reverse speech........YES WE CAN. What does it say....
THANK YOU SATAN
Chicodoodoo
27th March 2011, 21:50
For all practical purposes, Obama was hired by the real rulers of this world to assist in selling us their illusion. He is just a puppet, and he tells us the lies he is tasked to tell us. McCain would have been no different, just as Bush, Clinton, Carter, Bush Sr., Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, etc. were no different. The political process, the government, and the ideals behind it are all part of the illusion that they sell us in order to maintain their effective control over us. We are nothing but economic slaves to them, working to serve their best interests.
It's the big lie that no one questions, and the vision of the world that we have been taught to believe in is THE BIG LIE.
GlassSteagallfan
27th March 2011, 22:07
Worse than the lies is being desensitized by them.
Charlie Pecos
28th March 2011, 01:19
For all practical purposes, Obama was hired by the real rulers of this world to assist in selling us their illusion. He is just a puppet, and he tells us the lies he is tasked to tell us. McCain would have been no different, just as Bush, Clinton, Carter, Bush Sr., Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, etc. were no different. The political process, the government, and the ideals behind it are all part of the illusion that they sell us in order to maintain their effective control over us. We are nothing but economic slaves to them, working to serve their best interests.
It's the big lie that no one questions, and the vision of the world that we have been taught to believe in is THE BIG LIE.
Yup, Obama is just a salesman. His corporate masters hired him to sell us a lie so obvious as to be blatant and yet most Americans still think the buck stops with him, that he is running the show. Sadly, he is not. I am amazed at how many of my fellow Americans don't understand this one simple fact.
Lord Sidious
28th March 2011, 01:59
I am not sure if you guys have seen this before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyLsO6LpLSI
In a Punch and Judy show, the characters are all operated by the same individual.
bearcow
28th March 2011, 02:20
while obama is clearly a lair, i believe the idea of truth is too grandiose a concept for george bush jr to understand. so technically he cannot be called one.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8Mo9wgzZpRk/RnkULpJwtUI/AAAAAAAAAHg/Z70YPXxMr04/s400/aaaaaGeorgeBushEatingA_kitten.jpg
indiana
28th March 2011, 02:22
wrong thread..
str8thinker
28th March 2011, 06:10
I wouldn't have stumbled upon this one had I not read Shezbeth's delightful post
Every Local MSM News Segment to Date (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?17230)
Even though this video is over a year old, I find it still very funny.
Uploaded by TheOnion on Release: Mar 1, 2010
After Obama slips up during an address on health care, White House officials are forced to admit the president occasionally uses a backing track for important speeches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCyPAaubENE
cCyPAaubENE
witchy1
28th March 2011, 07:19
Hahahaha, what a fraud!
Teakai
28th March 2011, 08:41
The onion sign means it's a take off, right?
Either way - funny!
ulli
28th March 2011, 08:50
Hilarious.
Gotta love the Onion. They are getting better and better.
I hadn't seen this before... Thank you.
jackovesk
5th April 2011, 01:04
Obama is an illegal alien using deceased Thomas Woods social security number. SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ihc_1ZdlQzw/TZPf2Pqm6hI/AAAAAAAAC-Y/v_Fqdb0HwF4/s320/Obama2.jpg
Colorado Springs man's claim to have Obama records starts buzz
Excerpt: “According to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued,” said Hollister, who challenged whether the president is an American citizen in a lawsuit the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Jan. 18 without requiring a response from the White House.
However, that’s the Social Security number that appears on the Selective Service documents Hollister obtained.
Click link below for the rest of this article
http://www.gazette.com/articles/springs-115381-colorado-obama.html
Obama can't show what he doesn't have. Everything he has signed is null and void, as he is not constitutionally the president.
Another look at Obama's Social Security number
Excerpt: This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world's best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.
"All I can say," says Daniels of 042-68-4425, "is that it's phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980." Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama's, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.
Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all "042s" applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.
Click link below for the rest of this article
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=275861
(AP) declared Obama Kenyan
Excerpt: This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FoCF9qEdOpA/TZPqAFNzHhI/AAAAAAAAC-c/O8OmgIRK324/s400/kenyan.jpg
Click link below for the rest of this article
http://www.infowars.com/ap-declared-obama-kenyan-born/
PS - Obama is "Null & Void". Period..!
crosby
5th April 2011, 01:09
kudos to you for finding this information. very informative indeed. good job. things just keep getting more and more interesting with this man.
warmest regards, corson
ktlight
5th April 2011, 10:24
"US President Barack Obama has announced his intention to stand for a second term in office in 2012.
Mr Obama's team released a video on his official website and sent an e-mail to supporters announcing his plans.
The president has an online network of millions of Americans and his web campaign was widely seen as a key plank of his election success in 2008.
The announcement was widely expected, and his campaign team are set to file election papers this week.
Mr Obama does not actually appear in the video, posted on YouTube as well as the official campaign website. Instead supporters look back to the 2008 campaign and talk of their hopes for the 2012 bid.
"I don't agree with Obama on everything but I respect him and I trust him," Ed, from North Carolina, says in the video, a line seen as voicing a perspective aimed at attracting liberals and independents who have criticised some of Mr Obama's policies.
In his e-mail to supporters, Mr Obama said the campaign would start small and grow over time, "with people organising block-by-block, talking to neighbours, co-workers, and friends".
"So even though I'm focused on the job you elected me to do, and the race may not reach full speed for a year or more, the work of laying the foundation for our campaign must start today."
Unveiling a new look for Mr Obama's campaign website, his team told supporters: "The idea is to improve upon what's worked for the past four years, scrap what hasn't, and build a campaign that reflects the thoughts and experiences of the supporters who've powered this movement."
Analysts say the president will now work to convince US citizens he has delivered the type of change he promised America in 2008.
And during the next 20 months before the presidential election, he will have to defend the policies his administration has worked to impose, like his healthcare overhaul and his efforts to revitalise the economy.
Mr Obama's re-election campaign is reportedly seeking to raise as much as $1bn (£620m), an increase on the $750m raised for the 2008 campaign.
As the incumbent, Mr Obama's team will be able to call on the support of different donors than they did in 2008, when cash was raised through huge numbers of small individual donations and Mr Obama began the campaign as an outsider.
After the 'shellacking'
A number of Republican presidential hopefuls are expected to seek the nomination to run against Mr Obama.
Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee are thought likely to run again, with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Haley Barbour, currently governor of Mississippi, also tipped to stand.
John McCain's 2008 running mate Sarah Palin remains hugely popular with some Republicans but divides opinion nationally.
However, as it stands, Tim Pawlenty, the former governor of Minnesota, is the only leading candidate to have formally declared his candidacy.
Mr Obama took office in January 2009 with near-record approval ratings, but has seen his support fall during his first two years in office.
In November 2010, Mr Obama's Democratic Party lost control of the House of Representatives and shed several Senate seats in mid-term elections to Congress.
The president called the result a "shellacking" and vowed to listen to the concerns of US voters.
Despite shedding some support, polling by the Pew Research Center suggests Mr Obama is in a similar position at this stage to George W Bush and a stronger position than Bill Clinton, both of whom went on to win re-election convincingly.
In polling carried out in March, some 47% of registered voters said they would like to re-elect Mr Obama, with just 37% saying they would vote for an as-yet-unknown Republican candidate.
Some commentators have pointed to a possible play with numbers in the announcement: Mr Obama's announcement was made on the fourth day of the fourth month of the year, by the 44th US president."
Pilgrim
5th April 2011, 20:18
Ahaa, I see, isn´t that guy who promised there would be a change which you´d want to see in the world? All right, all right, he probably didn´t mention when...............:(
crosby
5th April 2011, 20:40
i think i'm gonna be sick.......
corson
Lord Sidious
5th April 2011, 20:41
So if the slogan last time was yes we can, what is it this time?
We are thinking about it?
crosby
5th April 2011, 20:42
So if the slogan last time was yes we can, what is it this time?
We are thinking about it?
"yes we won't"
corson
DawgBone
5th April 2011, 20:47
Did Obama come with a warranty???
Arpheus
5th April 2011, 21:07
I heard the new slogan is going to be called More unbroken promises .LOL :eek:
Charlie Pecos
6th April 2011, 02:59
Somewhere there is a group Illuminati types betting each other that we Americans will vote for him a second time, and having a good laugh because they know they are right. And it all matters for naught except the gullibility of the American people.
crosby
6th April 2011, 03:07
Somewhere there is a group Illuminati types betting each other that we Americans will vote for him a second time, and having a good laugh because they know they are right. And it all matters for naught except the gullibility of the American people.
how right you are Charlie Pecos. i say we start an international smear campaign on the double......lol..... (although i know it won't help)......
warmest, corson
arctourist
6th April 2011, 03:27
I just don't get what people see in the guy....no brains,no heart-and no muscle tone whatsoever!
fifi
6th April 2011, 05:18
If Ron Paul runs for President, with Jesse Ventura as Vice-President, how much chance do you Avalon members think they can win?
DevilPigeon
6th April 2011, 05:27
-----
"Hope" - what a wonderful sentiment. Gives a nice warm & fuzzy feeling like something good is gonna happen, but also allows the blaming of forces external to oneself when it doesn't.
Lord Sidious
6th April 2011, 05:27
If Ron Paul runs for President, with Jesse Ventura as Vice-President, how much chance do you Avalon members think they can win?
They will win.
I will make sure of it, voter fraud worked for President Shrub.
oceanz
6th April 2011, 09:51
Yes we can no doubt stands for:
Y ielding powers to
E litists
S uppress the populous
W orld domination
E xterminate all
C itizens
A rise
N ew world order
modwiz
6th April 2011, 10:10
There is no way around how political information reaches the masses, squeezed as some sort of predigested goo from the cloaca that is TV, Huffpost, Daily Kos, MSNBC, any major newspaper and whatever I left out. It leaves one pondering what the next move has to be when what is happening in not only unacceptable it is unworkable. I really wonder what kind of shape this country and world will be in as we limp broken, invalid and crippled into the future.
I really don't know what is next but even talking about any of this seriously makes me feel like I am playing a child's game of make believe except this is not fun.
There may be more than one answer but none of them are pretty or nice in the short run.
nomadguy
6th April 2011, 16:25
if he wins perhaps the inauguration speech will be in Astana with the rest of congress... - http://www.google.com/search?q=inaugeration+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=64q&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&q=astana%2C+congress+2012&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=d8193e5b46b6707
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.