Blastolabs
21st February 2021, 16:43
Antibody Dependent Enhancement of infection occurs when antibodies that normally defend against a virus backfire and instead aid a virus in entering our cells and replicating, often leading to death not unlike AIDS.
Here was what initially woke me up to the fact that ADE is likely an issue
It is a paper that states "ADE is NOT a problem"
Well if a peer reviewed paper says ADE is not an issue that means we are safe right?
Well who wrote the paper, and did they follow the normal procedures that scientists use to prevent their own bias from either intentionally or unintentionally skewing the results?
46185
So the authors of the paper that say ADE is not an issue also all own patents on Sars-Cov-2 Vaccines??!?!
Hmmm that is sure as hell a conflict of interest, they stand to lose BILLIONS if they found that ADE is an issue....
Lets see if they followed standard scientific procedures in their experiments...
46186
Ahhhhhh....
So now we see that the same people who have billions of dollars to gain or lose depending on the outcome of their experiments decided to throw science out the window and ran a non-random non-blinded experiment.
www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2622-0
Here was what initially woke me up to the fact that ADE is likely an issue
It is a paper that states "ADE is NOT a problem"
Well if a peer reviewed paper says ADE is not an issue that means we are safe right?
Well who wrote the paper, and did they follow the normal procedures that scientists use to prevent their own bias from either intentionally or unintentionally skewing the results?
46185
So the authors of the paper that say ADE is not an issue also all own patents on Sars-Cov-2 Vaccines??!?!
Hmmm that is sure as hell a conflict of interest, they stand to lose BILLIONS if they found that ADE is an issue....
Lets see if they followed standard scientific procedures in their experiments...
46186
Ahhhhhh....
So now we see that the same people who have billions of dollars to gain or lose depending on the outcome of their experiments decided to throw science out the window and ran a non-random non-blinded experiment.
www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2622-0