PDA

View Full Version : Extraterrestrial Contact at Sea, off Terra Nova, 1942-1943



Mecklenburger
17th March 2021, 15:19
INTRODUCTION

A few years ago my London publisher asked me to re-translate Heinz Schaeffer's autobiography known in English under the title"U-977" and first published in German in Buenos Aires in 1950.

Heinz Schaeffer died in the 1970's, but his grand-daughter was curious to know whether a fresh look at his book might reveal some overlooked details about the voyage. U-977 was one of two Third Reich submarines which surrendered to Argentina at the end of the Second World War. Where the boat might have been for about a month in the August period of 1945 before surrendering continues to haunt researchers. The boat's whereabouts after 4 July 1945 are difficult to determine but at least I did come up with something, not in Antarctica as was probably expected, but east of Terra Nova at Christmas 1942. By chance I stumbled across what is, in my opinion, the greatest mystery in the history of maritime navigation. Is there an alien deep sea base in the waters east of Canada? Never had there been provable extraterrestrial contacts of this nature before in the history of warfare.

PART ONE (OF TWO)

U-445 was a Type VIIc German attack submarine commanded by Oberleutnant Heinz Konrad Fenn. On this voyage his first watchkeeping officer was Leutnant Heinz Schaeffer.

U-445 sailed from the base at Marviken, Norway on 8 November 1942 and put into St Nazaire, France on 3 January 1943. No ships were claimed sunk or damaged by U-445 during the voyage. No Allied warship was lost in action during the Christmas period 1942. Since at Chapter 8 in his book "U-977" Heinz Schaeffer stated that on Christmas Eve 1942 he had fired the torpedoes which sank an American destroyer, and the claim was not substantiated, he was accused of lying and self-aggrandizement.

In the book, Schaeffer stated that that night he was on bridge watch. It was dark, very heavy seas were running and breaking over the conning tower. He and the bosun's mate saw a shadow ahead in the darkness. A destroyer of typical American build, flush deck and four smoke stacks. Fenn the commander came to his side. The destroyer had slewed to present its full beam. They saw somebody smoking on its bridge. Schaeffer fired one torpedo which missed. The second torpedo was fired when the range had closed to 400 metres. A hit. Great flames rose up, red, blue, yellow and green, then a gigantic column of water before the destroyer sank like a stone. They never saw a lifeboat or raft. 'There was no point in searching for survivors in those seas'.

I applied to see the relevant pages of the U-445 War Diary. It contained an over-large blank space left by Fenn no doubt to be completed later at St Nazaire after discussions about the incident. This would not be normal procedure.

It is clear that Fenn was uneasy about the Christmas Eve enemy warship which he calls a "corvette". At 2030 hrs it had appeared suddenly 2.5 kilometres astern. Weather was misty with hail and very poor visibility. He could not make out the warship through the periscope and the hydrophone operator reported that the corvette was running totally silent.

At 2200 hrs the War Diary entry reads: "Alarm. Corvette in sight at 1000 metres bearing down on us. No radar trace detected by Fu-M-B. No Asdic. No propellor noise. Corvette passed overhead and then zig-zagged. Quadrant AJ 8863." On the German Navy grid chart this position is where lines drawn south from the southern tip of Greenland and due east of the Strait of Belle Isle, Terra Nova, meet.

Upon the return of U-445 to St Nazaire, Admiral Doenitz was bound to have asked Fenn why he had not attacked the enemy warship. In his reply he and Schaeffer would have supplied their account of the sinking of the American destroyer. Doenitz believed in the The Flying Dutchman and since Fenn was not credited with the sinking in the War Diary, somebody obviously concluded it must have been a ghost ship.

The incident might have been forgotten had it not been for the strange saga of U-188 and a large Allied convoy in much the same position a couple of months later, and to which Schaeffer's American destroyer was the prelude.

PART TWO follows.

Mecklenburger
17th March 2021, 20:18
PART TWO

Some time after completing work on Schaeffer's book, I was given another U-boat book to translate. This was Klaus Willmann's biography of Ordinary Seaman Anton Staller entitled "Das Boot U-188" published in 2008 by Rosenheimer. Staller had been conscripted into the Kriegsmarine at the age of seventeen and after various training courses he now joined the crew of U-188, a new Type VII boat commanded by Kapitänleutnant Lüdden. Because of his exceptional eyesight, Staller was made a permanent lookout on the boat.

U-188 had put to sea on her maiden patrol on 4 March 1943. In the operational area south of Greenland on the night of 11 April, a a convoy was in sight about 15 nautical miles distant. U-188 had to maintain contact without betraying her presence and wait until other boats of the pack had arrived. The convoy was proceeding westwards at eight knots in four columns abreast. The U-boat was on its starboard side. The grid square where the attack would commence was AJ 9661, where a line drawn east from Terra Nova, Strait of Belle Isle north side, meets longitude 40 degrees West. Somewhere in the distance, depth charge attacks against one or two U-boats were heard. The rest of the pack would not be coming. U-188 would have to attack alone.

Convoy ON 176 consisting of 49 merchant vessels with escorting warships had sailed from Liverpool for New York. One of the escorts was a Lend-Lease flush deck destroyer with four smoke stacks. She had formerly been USS Branch, and after transfer to the Royal Navy in 1940 had been renamed HMS Beverley. On 9 April 1943 she collided with the steamer Cairnvalona in bad weather. This put the destroyer's anti-submarine and degaussing gear out of action. Though ordered by the convoy commodore to make for Nova Scotia to repair, out of pride Lt-Cdr Rodney Athelstan Price made the fateful decision to keep the virtually useless HMS Beverley on station at the rear of the convoy. Without degaussing gear she was a sitting duck for torpedoes and her crew was soon to pay the price.

A large section of the U-188 War Diary is missing over a 7-minute period from 0552 to 0559 hrs. This typed page must have contained a great deal of invaluable information. Therefore the observations of lookout Staller are useful in piecing together what happened next when in conditions of near calm with good visibility, Lüdden decided to attack.

The priority target was "an extremely elongated tanker" estimated at 8,000 register tons. A fan of four torpedoes was fired. One torpedo hit the tanker astern, the explosive column rose up, the tanker collapsed inwards astern and sank stern first within 45 seconds. This would be impossible in normal circumstances. The War Diary states this as fact and Staller confirms it. And where have we seen this before: "Nobody was seen on deck, no boat was got away, and there were no survivors in the sea," which was almost a flat calm that morning.

The second torpedo missed, the other two kept running and detonated after 118 and 131 seconds. Both hit and sank HMS Beverley although this was not known by the U-boat crew at the time. She had a crew of 151 and only three survived.

U-188 turned away looking for fresh victims for the two rear tubes. The next target was a straggler, "a gigantic looking freighter" torpedoed at 0559 hrs. "It looked odd with superstructure running along its whole length," Lüdden wrote in the War Diary. Both torpedoes hit, one fore, one aft, the boilers exploded, the ship was enveloped in white smoke, the burning stern reared up and, naturally, the freighter sank within seconds, and nobody, crew or survivor was ever seen.

Of the 49 ships of convoy ON 176 which had left Liverpool, Lancastrian Prince was sunk by U-404 on 12 April. The other 48 merchantmen all arrived safely at New York and sailed again in later convoys. Neither the elongated tanker nor the gigantic freighter with its massive superstructure were missed by the convoy; neither sent a message on the distress frequency; the convoy rescue ships were not detailed to search for survivors and the German wireless monitoring service never intercepted any signals from ON 176 regarding losses from the convoy. U-188 was given credit for sinking HMS Beverley since no other U-boat had attacked the convoy that day.

What was so special about this AJ area east of Belle Isle, Canada? Where is the base of the entities operating these weird designs? What is the point of it all? Was it all a huge practical joke? The three ships seen to go down after being torpedoed, namely Schaeffer's American destroyer, the elongated tanker and the great freighter, all went down like a stone within one minute, leaving no survivors struggling on deck or in the water, and none of the three ships was missed. Apparently only German U-boat men ever saw the bogus ships. Why would forces beyond our ken design and create oddities instead of copies of real ships, oddities of laughably over-long or top-heavy structure which nevertheless deluded experienced U-boat men into thinking that they were the real thing? And why was that long tanker so placed that the helpless HMS Beverley would receive the torpedoes that missed?